290039_PERMITTING_20171231

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUITURE DATE
REFERNNCE SLIP
io
-------------------------------------
----------------- ACTION
NOTE AND RETURN
APPROVAL
PER PHONE CALL
AS REQUESTED
RECOMMENDATION
FOR COMMENT
Cl REPLY FOR SIGNATURE OF
--------------------------
�R INFORMATION El RETURNED
INITIALS
SEE ME
NOTE AND FILE
YOUR SIGNATURE
EEIUQS ---f-'"•'c=i -r(rv___ ls----'r-^---------------
y`- - • --- -- ----
-------------------�-----_-__.. -r_____-______-_.__-_----------
/ �C�rS
FM
---------------------------------------
-, U S.o ea: +sessxs-zie FORM AD_514 (e-U)

Animal Waste Stolracre Pond and La-aoon Closure
(Please type or print all information that dots not require a signature) JUL 2 2 2005
General Information. �l�lj� l;;;=_.Siaier;•
Name of Faun: !7 rl l f 161-r,n Facility No::E' 11 Qn r if l GE:
Owner(s) Name:_
ivlailin Address: Phone No:-12M,�����75'G"�_�3
,1, V:/1f, , i� �,3d _ Coun[v:
Operation Desc_rintion (remaining animals only):
lease check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there Will. still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure. please provide the following information on the animals that wiill remain.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine Na. of Animals Type of Poultry
0 Wean to Feeder Z] Laver
Feeder to Finish --J Pullets
:D Farrow to Wean
No. of Animals
Type of Cattle No. of.Animals
Dairy
:I Beef
M Farrow to Feeder
.t Farrow to Finish Other Type of Liugsrock: ,1 umner oj.tnirnals:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold? Yes D No
er-
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after jthis one closes? Yes 0 No Fg�-'
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?:
of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division
of Water Quality's — T Regional Office (see map on back)
was contacted on 77F s (Mate) for notification of the pending closure of this nd r la-oon.
This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the start of closure which began on � (date).
i verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan which meets
all MRCS specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21
of the•North Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land D"er (Please
Signatur
Date:
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets ail requirements set forth in the MRCS Technical
Guide Standard 998. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste
liquids and sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been
removed, all slopes have been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliatior
Address (:
Signature:
eturn within days tot otivtn; completion r}r animal �v�ter str}ra�e pond or agoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality- Water Quality Section
Cumpliunce Group
P.U. Box 29-3-
Raleigh. `IC 27626-0vS
PLC - l INTav 1. 19%

I
WASTE STORAGE POND CLOSURE PLAN
NAME: Ms Susan Harris
211 Whitehart School Road
Thomasville, NC 27360
LOCATION: Jacob Street Ext.
PHONE: [phone]
Winston-Salem Reg, Division of Water Quality
Phone [phone]
H.U:* 03040103030030
Facility # 29-39
Plan prepared by: Lloyd Phillips Jr.
District Resource Specialist
Davidson S WCD
336-242-2076
TRACT # 6349
COUNTY Davidson
LAT./LONG. 35 53' 36"
80 07' 06"
RECEIVED
MAY 2 3 2005
Winoton-Salem
Regional Office
NOTE: NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE OR DAVIDSON SOIL
& WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT PERSONNEL MUST BE ON SITE WHILE
THE STORAGE POND/LAGOON IS BEING CLOSED OUT IN ORDER TO
CERTIFY THE CLOSURE.
GENERAL INFORMATION
The waste storage lagoon was constructed in 1990 with design assistance from the
Natural Resource Conservation Service and the Davidson Soil & Water Conservation
District to contain and store animal waste from a 60 sow farrow to feeder operation.
This facility was in operation until the mid 1990's, at which time the owner ceased
production. The landowner has no plans to restock this operation.
2

•
The facility has not received a Notice of Violation from the Division of Water Quality.
Ms. Harris intends to have the dam breached upon completion of liquid and sludge being
removed.
The anticipated time of closure is summer of 2005. The waste applicator will be
responsible for keeping records for volumes of liquid removed and for field application
records on forms provided by the Davidson SWCD. The landowner is to notify Davidson
SWCD or NRCS personnel at least 48 hours prior to commencement of closure.
CLOSEOUT SPECIFICATIONS
The closure of the waste storage lagoon will be completed in accordance with the
standards and specifications outlined in the Closure of Waste Impoundments, (360)
Section IV of the NRCS Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG). The waste storage pond
will be agitated with a PTO driven chopper pump for sufficient time to create slurry from
the sludge. At least two agitation locations will be required. The structure has a bottom
that is located above the water table. The bottom should be capable of supporting earth -
moving equipment such as a track loader. Liquid is to be agitated well, before any
pumping is to begin. Once material is agitated properly, pumping into liquid transfer
tanks (honey wagons) will begin. Waste is to be land applied to designated fields in such
a manner not to exceed the hydraulic loading capacity of the soil and the crop nitrogen
requirements. After all liquids have been pumped out and side slopes washed down, pool
bottoms are to be scraped to remove any existing sludge. This material is to be hauled to
application fields in dump trucks and land applied with track loader or tractor and blade.
Waste application must be made uniformly and the application rates and amounts
described in the closure plan must not be exceeded.
After sludge is removed embankment is to be breached a minimum of 10 feet wide at the
bottom and side slopes graded to a 3.1 slope or flatter. No additional soil from off site
areas is to be placed into pool areas. Grading will be done in such a manner that no
surface waters are impounded. After grading is completed, all disturbed areas are to be
seeded with tall fescue, fertilized, limed and mulched with the following materials and
amounts:
Tall fescue seed 60 lbs./acre
2 tons lime/acre
1,000 lbs. 10- 10- 1 0/acre
60 — 80 hales of straw/acre
After grading is complete, certifying technical specialist will determine the acreage to be
seeded and total amount of materials required.
.0

0 . s
REMOVAL OF INFLOW DEVICES
No inflow devices exist. In the event that the landowner elects to convert waste storage
pond to fresh water farm pond, NRCS standards and specifications for practice code 378
(pond) are to be adhered to.
DESCRIPTION OF BUFFERS AND SETBACKS
The custom waste applicator will be informed of all applicable setback distances and
buffers to insure that water quality and closure procedures are properly followed.
Technical specialist on site will review the closure plan with applicator and discuss
locations of fields to receive animal waste. Waste applicator will be given a complete
copy of the closure plan with field maps. Application maps will have perennial streams
and fresh water impoundment's noted on the maps. Approximate property boundaries
will also be shown on map to prevent waste from being applied too close to property
lines. Setbacks and buffers distances are as follows: no closer than 25 feet from perennial
waters or streams, 100 feet from wells, 200 feet from dwellings not associated with the
farm: Waste is to be applied in such a manner not to reach property and public right-of-
ways.
VOLUMES TO BE REMOVED
Refer to attached calculations on volumes on the respective waste storage pond. The
volumes are based on site conditions at the time of closure plan development. The liquid
level of the structures is subject to change based on climatic conditions.
LAND APPLICATION OF ANIMAL WASTE
The effluent will be land applied to nearby pasture and hayland fields. Waste must be
applied in such a manner that no runoff of effluent occurs.
Waste is not to be applied while it is raining or when soil conditions are saturated.
Applying waste prior to predicted rainfall events is also to be avoided.
Refer to waste analysis data sheets attached for nutrient concentrations and analysis.
Land application data, fields, soil types, RYE and acres are contained in the attached data
sheets. The Phosphorus Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) has been applied to all fields to
insure that phosphorus is not being over applied. Since application fields are maintained
as established tall fescue, soil erosion is not expected to be a concern.
4

I AGREE TO CLOSE THE WASTE STORAGE POND ACCORDING TO THE
ABOVE CLOSURE PLAN, WHICH MEETS THE USDA/NRCS STANDARDS &
SPECIFICATIONS. I FURTHER UNDERSTAND THAT TECHNICAL STAFF OF
THE DAVIDSON SWCD AND NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY MUST BE
NOTIFIED 48 HOURS BEFORE CLOSURE ACTIVITIES ARE TO BEGIN.
LANDOWNER: l �,�—
DATE: 5 -.L
PLAN PREPARED BY:
TITLE: �L _
DATE: S cS dS

0
is
VOLUME TO BE REMOVED
Length (Top)
Width (Top)
Total Depth .
Side Slopes
Liquid Depth (ft)
Sludge Depth (ft)
Freeboard (ft)
Lagoon Dims. @ Liquid Level
Lagoon Dims.@ Sludge Level
Lagoon Dims. @ Bottom
Length
103.80
65.40
65.40
Width
92.80
54.40
54.40
Cubic Feet Gallons
Liquid Depth 50795.52 379950.49
Sludge Depth 0.00 0.00
Total 50795.52 379950.49

WASTE ANALYSIS DATA
Date of Analysis �%1G�2004.
Nitrogen Concentration (Broadcast & Irrigation)
Volume (Gallons) lbs. of PAN
Liquid 0 06' 379950.49 22.80
Sludge 0.00 0.00
Total 379950.49 22.80
0.06 lbs. PAN Mixed Volume Concentratlon/1,00
1,63 lbs. per acre -inch
Copper Concentration
Zinc Concentration
0.01 ppm Copper Mixed Volume Concentration
0.03 ppm Zinc Mixed Volume Concentration
Liquid
Nitrogen m) Conversion
P911[l
Factor
0.2266
lbs. NIAc-ln.
3.33
Sludge
0.2266
0.00
Avallability
Coeff, PANIAc-In
0.50 1.67
0.46 0.00

L�
Liquid
Sludge
14.7 0.2266
0.2266
3.33 0.78 2.60
0.00 0.60 0.00

LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE (NITROGEN BROADCAST & IRRIGATION)
Tract#
Field
-QSoil
RYE
NlAc {max.) N/Ac (21anned)
Acres
PAN Appl
ns Applied
ADo. Amount {In.l
6349"' F!!�� �nstttr-- -zPnB T 771,
2-9
1.63
1.78
0.61
-P349 'J�Fescue .P"r NO -7 g;.j.q '4
4
163
2.46
0.61
C_qB-_tt 2 2 --: Il "tq
1.9
1-63
1.17
0.61
2.9
1-63
1.78
0.61
tura. jA45 te p M ­,Z 9
�049'- -^5-:f,-- F6scueWay
3.2
1.63
1-96
0.61
- �Fdscue�.Pastdn�g PnD, 357FJ
4-8
1.63
2.95
0.61
6349 ;�Fescpjelpasiuk .--AaA- —,�E_4;� 3?"
3.1
1.63
1.90
0.61
S2
U9
2.2
1-63
1.35
0.61
­7�
t
liffa.
77=
d—,
j7
6a­
1g,
In
7 Xv
%
AM
z ME
u 'R
_K
W
-ir
0
0

y - �Y ,2� ^+x ^ ' � •yi ..$�� y+'�, .. Nth::` .F.
'9 tw"
- E,4�w,
- ri�
rnk-
17.
_may. � 's.•_' r ..,E _� _ �� W � � � �i

LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE
(COPPER)
Date of Last
Tract #
Field #
Waste Cu
Application
Conversion
Cu Index
Soil
Test Cu
New Soil Cu
Soil Test
Applied (ppm}
Amount {in.}
factor
Adjustment
Index
Index
1
0.01
0.61
6.297
0.04
-65
65.04
2
0.01
0.61
6.297
0.04
284
284.04
3
0.01
0.61
6.297
0.04
428
428.04
4
0.01
0.61
6.297
0.04
548
548.04
11:61349
5
0.01
0.61
6.297
0.04
17
174.04
9
0.01
0.61
6.297
0.04
i 45
145.04
11
0.01
0.61
6.297
0.04
1 &
161.04
12
0.01
0.61
6.297
0.04
k1
381.04
•
•

LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE .(ZINC)
Date of Last Soil Tract #
Field #
Waste Zn Applied
Application
Conversion
Zn Index
Soil Test Zn
New Soil
Test
(ppm)
Amount (in.)
Factor
Adjustment
Index
Zn Index
09/16/2004 6349
1
0.03
0.61
3.193
0.06
0
30.06
6349
2
0.03
0.61
3.193
0.06
268
268.06
6349
3
0.03
0.61
3.193
0.06
385
385.06
6349
4
0.03
0.61
3.193
0.06
- -589
589.06 .
6349
5
0.03
0.61
3.193
0.06
'119
119.06
6349
9
0.03
0.61
3.193
0.06
73
73.06
6349
11
0.03
0.61
3.193
0.06
96
96.06
6349
12
0.03
0.61
3.193
0.06
3.46
346.06
•

NGDARiCSAgronomlcDvxsion� Phone(919)¢733 ZG55WAebASite�ww:ncagrcom/agronami/,�,'ReportNo 4Y;4081_
Grower.
'
® rTestReportThomasville,
iGo
Harris, Susan
"' Whitehart School Rd.
NC 27360
Copies To: Phillips, Lloyd
Phillips, Lloyd
Farm: 5853
-
C/0 USDA-NRSCDavidson
11/8/2004 SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Davidson County
301 East Center St.
Lexington, NC 27292
Agronomist Comments
�Fie�laInformati9n - '�
Appledl�ime
�Recommentl�a"'tions
�, � h-�
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo� Yr T/A
Crop or Year time
N P205 K20
Mg Cu
Zn B Mn See Note
OOBOI
.'
1st Crop: Fes/OG/fim,M 0
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M 0
120-200 0 60-80
120-200 0 60-80
0 0
0 0
0 .0 0 12
.0 .0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class IIM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I CA Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N N714-N Na
MIN 0.36 122
4.5 80.0 0.9 6.2 119 34 59.0 18.0
276 180 180 119
119
174 30 0.1
-Yr
_
�Zn
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo r/A
Crop or Year Lime
N P205 K20
Mg Cu
B Mn See Note
OOB�2
1st Crop: Fes/OG/fi0
m,M
120-200 90-110 110-130
0 0
0 .0 0 12
(�
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/fim,M 0
120-200 90-110 110-130
0 0
0 .0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K I Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Ma-AI(1)Mn-Al(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Ca-1 S-I SS -I NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.41 1.06
7.3 85.0 1.1 6.1 17 11 68.0 16.0
288 188 188 209
209
148 66 0-4
Field Informa#r _
'AppledLini�e
Rec�'�omin" eiidations
�'
..-.Lz
Sample No. Last Crop.
0OB03
%
Mo Yr T/A
-Crop or Year Lime
1st Crop: Corn Grain 0
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/rim,E 0
N P205 K20
120-160 0 20-40
50-70 0-20 0
Mg Cu
0 0
0 0
Zn B Mn See Note
0 .0 PH$ 3
0 .0 0$ 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-I KI Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.18 1.23
5.4 93.0 0.4 6.6 83 61 63.0 24.0
357 222 222 248
248
152 68 0.2
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N P205 K20
Mg Cu
Zn B Mn See Note
0OB04 L/
Ist Crop: Clover/Grass, M .7T
0.0 0 50-70
0 0
0 0 12
7?
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-I S-I SS -I NO3-N N714-N Na
MIN 0.27 1.19
5.9 85.0 0.9 6.1 162 72 58.0 - 20.0
288 •182 401
401
222 50 0.2

Al
3976
-01
3975
3974
rw
� TIE,
IV
3972
lie
780000
�o Mapped. ed4ed.and published hythe Geological Survey

INCDA"? _ ouoQu�Divrsion�!f300�eed �Creek�RoadwRalei NC27,G07�64G5 d919Tr7�33R - 5.5
Re d, NO. Wi �V�
_ _ � _ • 1- 7.
Grower: Harris, Susan
Copies To: Phillips, Lloyd
211 Whitehart School Rd.
Thomasville, NC 27360
aste Analysis R'"'Ort Fat,:
Phillips, Lloyd
C/O USDA-NRSC-Davidson
ll
301 East Center St.
6/16/04
Davidson County
Lexington, NC 27292
Sam Ica b 5
�Laborafo iResults" 1 r miI on'�unIU:si erwise noted
Sample ID:
N
P % Ca MR S Fe Mn Zn
Cu P Mo CI C
SH0604
Total 14.7
37.6 27.0 127 35.2 22.6 33.4 1.00 3.35
1.06 038
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li PH
SS C.•N DM% CCE% ALE
ALS
-NO3
17.0 6.11
Description:
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Li .
Urea
Recommendations:
.. •Nutrients>Awailable for�F R Cro = �� 1bs/I000 ulrons
Other Blemeits ' � rlis/100Oyarro f: ' i=
Applrcution-Mddbod
Soil'tncorp
N - PM 'X20 Ca 'Mg' r<�` S •� - Fe Mn' Zn Cu B Mo El ,_x
'. 010 0 57 ° 0 24 0 85 23, fs O:15W `0 22 Q'.01 a:03 0.01 Q 01
Na�r"' Ni 'Cd rzPb' Al ;iSe L,`-_} '
0.14 `' a
- _:
..
B adcast _
; _ 6 . �0F ,-,u 0.22 4 ` O 1 4 20 U 1 0 2 O:Oi 1
0.0 � `� 50� �:�x�Q:7 :0:21 . � 0 .(i
4.1.4
e H'af`thet o�n I� uid is`below tlxideal6iane fog bacteria!'aCtiq`ti"and waste<teak�nent. Gradual) yusti'H�b" �` y adj. : ;p y addul1$lb. of agncuttural limey er 1QQ0 "Cu.cu. h. oFliqui[I,remaining in the lagoon, Samplethe lagoon
onto c�o�ntin� 9
ad ust; H untd �tjis tkie deeslredrran
and
with
•

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedi Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone]
Report No: 04812
Grower:
Harris, Susan
Copies to:
County Extension Director
211 Whitehart School Rd.
Phillips,
Lloyd
t
�
Thomasville, NC 27360
Farm: 5853
FsR. .'sF? - : :tip--: _ ,. f : - r .. & % > .'-=F'=,s+'=3,s4" -a.'•w"-r9'-"`ia
9/16/04
SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS
Davidson County
Agronomist Comments:
C 12, $
Field information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T A
Crop or Year Lime N
P105 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
S01 l No Crop
1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,E .3T 50-70
70-90 40-60
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Crop: FeS/OGITim,M 0 120-200
50-70 80-100
0 0
0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-Al (1) Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N NH►-N Na
MIN 0.27 1.34
6.5 94.0 0.4 6.3 31 24 70.0 23.0 214
138 138 30
30
65
44
0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N
P205 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
F01 -2_ No Crop
1 st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M .4T 180-220
0 10-30
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Crop: No Cro
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-Al (1) Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N N11r-N Na
MIN 0.41 1,21
7.4 92.0 0.6 6.3 236 103 59.0 26.0 101
70 268
268
284
36
0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N
P205 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
F02 3 No Crop
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M 0 180-220
0 0
0 0
0
pH$
12
2nd Crop: No_Crop
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-A! (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NCB-N Affh-N Na
MIN 0.36 1,22
9.0 94.0 0.5 6.6 279 156 59.0 27.0 131
86 385
385
428
42
0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N
W5 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
F03 41- No Crop
1 st Crap: Berm Hay/Pas, M .6T 180-220
0 0
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Crop: No Crop
Test Results
.Soil Class HM% WN
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
N&N N11r-N Na
MIN 0.46 1.29
9.1 91.0 0.8 62 404 180 60.0 22.0 244
156 589
589.
548
77
0.3

AgronoFruc Division Phone g19)7. We�i., A g1':Cbi a l'0IIomi/ Grower l orris Susan Report No 10©81�` � Pg 2
!
_NCDA&CS
,54-0_S
K
-
`sma
'Field lfnfo"rtioia -
AppLed Lame
tln'r_`.
FRecommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg Cu
Zn B
Mn
See Note
OOB05
1st Crap: Berm Hay/Pas,M
.5T
180-220 0 10-30
0 0
0
0
12
C,
1
2nd Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
0
180-220 0 10-30
0 0
0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-I
Ca% ft%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-I
SS -I NO3-N NH¢-N Na
MIN 0.22 1.15
5.0 84.0
0.8 6.3 157 106
52.0 21.0
134 90 90 73
73
145
27
0.1
Vf el`dinfarmation'
Applied Lime
�Rec" ommenda'�tions
:s, v
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 &0
Mg Cu
Zn B
Mn
See Note
OOB06 / p
1st Crop: Fes/OG/Pim,M
0
120-200 0 20-40
0 0
0 .0
0
12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Fim,M
0
120-200 0 20-40
0 0
0 .0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I KI
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
-Cu-1
S-I
SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Jva
MIN 0.27 1.11
6.8 88.0
0.8 6.2 130 61
63.0 21.0
123 88 88 176
176
230
35
0.2
Field lnformafion _}
`IiedfLim°`e
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg Cu
Zn B
Mn
See Note
OOB07 'r
1st Crop: Fes/OG/1'irn,M
0
120-200 0 40-60
0 0
0 .0
0
12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/fim,M
0
120-200 0 40-60
0 0
0 .0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N AWN Na
MIN 0.32 1.17
5.6 84.0
0.9 6.4 87 47
61.0 18.0
263 169 169 96
96
161
42
0.1
'1f f '� tlA►'
Fieldrinformation
'iP?T+
'Applied�Lime;
Recomm_eridationsx
-lam .'7„ r d
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg Cu
Zn B
Mn
See Note
OOB08 lye
1st Crop: Kenaf, Fiber
0
120-160 0 0
0 0
0
pH$
3
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/fim,E
0
50-70 0 0
0 0
0 .0
pH$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-1
SS -I NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.36 1.23
5.7 88.0
0.7 6.5 344 230
49.0 18.0
479 297 297 346
346
381
100
0.2

U.S. OF_PARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS • CPA • 16
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
2 -81
//// CONSERVATION PLAN MAP
,O,wner SG,,5,4d _1�19rrl-.s _ _ Operator �15 A'; is
County _SAY/DS,d,,J _ State NG Date
ACPoProxtmate acres Ap roxtmate scale
1
operating with
Conservation District
Plan identification Ac5 Photo number
Assisted by' LAa- ry l r�1 ,T� _ _USDA Soil Conservation Service
4
f .. �`d7. i�:' * ry •+ 1'; ry'�,
i ,� t�.. it �• ��:' � J .r�� ,1 f � r` ♦ "? 4 y'�' .,�,���� �r,"�� . -
�1
% (yyryl�! � •n7 0 ' "!- y�l, _ T � *�r Z F F` ♦i' h �, �,�. �� ,M
?� ,,, � , r'RiB�.`" Hsu ``•J sf•" � r � � J.e�.k w 'r .� a ..
�i t X C •Jy r h i
11 J M ; k
� •tom r 3 ' I' �Y7,
\4- u r"yV
e
0.
Tit
'ti ,y 1��• „
k.'70y�'-,iE.•
7 ' f,'.„ Lfif pj"� �r' 'i✓�'
�� i.. ' �i'� ", �1 ..,.--- 7. .!' _,art , ,a'. � � +T 4 � i• '�, 3 y � -
L, N � 1 �✓'`'r �r a, �?� l t � • �F, S �r" 3 fe � : � ` � . �''?+' K i F
�� �,Y' -. j�°,�` y. �y t ac-' t I -� 1�T�'r: HIV s Jti t�. • 7�y�,�_ �-$J' r�"° t' �1.t1 _

i
e'*U. DEPARTMENT OF AGRIWURE NC--ENG- 40
� 2dil Conservation Service 5/83
LOCATION CODE �R r ►�? .. r [7 n1
A5 43U/Lr GAll" dq,-JbC6' / r Le-4wC c n1
PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE ST 'i�'d�
4t r+� }1. ! rJ G
NAME (I H A(2 L_L S_ (J q)22 1,5 ACP # DATE Z -15-90 DISTRICT
t�
LENGTH /
81 DE SLOPEZ_Y TO I
AVE. TOP ELEV.
g' �o � ♦�0 ti
y 1
-min SECTION ----�♦/jam•
♦
�nr � ♦
11 / Jlp i S LOP
Yl� p%AVE. BOTTOMS ELEV.
LENGTH _
6 5 '
Volume depth
.97/5
Ea of top) +
/o
(are 3of bottom)
+ (4 x area raids ction)
q?-Cu.Ft.
6
Use of facility _W4 5 T F
Capacity
Gallons
Volume Cost -sharing Cu. Ft.
Soil type 624N4EX E9 Z 7' aiv
B. M. description mop arc Ai [C
li r= z P /' 6,0 N FlI rl 4F i !1 r= L D 'N
t
Elev. /DU . 00
SUMMARY
-Bottom
Elev.
Normal liquid level Elev.
9 Y 1 D
awaA
Storage for normmRa�uprecir (Ft + , b r
Maximum liquid
level Elev,
_9 ,r
Storage for:
25 yr. freq.
precip. (Ft.)
+ . s
Crest ESW
Elev.
r-
Stage (Ft.)
+ -------
Freeboard (Ft.)
+
Top of Dam
Elev.
„ 20,1,�^

State of North Caro
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 17, 2000
Susan Harris
211 White -hart School Rd
Thomasville NC 27360
AAWNM% 4iR
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF'
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Creekside Farm
Facility Number 29-39
Davidson County
Dear Susan Harris;
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Ranking
1 0.33 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk • •
Inactive Waste La,,00hs and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Winston-Salem Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry Coble
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Davidson County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

�y sion of Water�Quality
ivir £-
yy "M3•4 'Fi"j- y ix ' ty 4 ivrLsion�-of Soil and WTF
ater Conservation
i. i 'x- rt' „t Y✓. bS.d" 'L a t a ';• k w ��r i "�+• s 3 +:
r�� `�t"in� Other Agencyr ,; �•#Y },,'„� �' o W4 .�P t`. �_ n'� a, 3E
�,_i '•'iiw_ s ^w ;; w{ . S.•.r.'`, 'i'- �, :ai .ka.M
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 29 39
[] Permitted [] Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date of Visit 2/11/ZUDU
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 8(1(Q4.............
Farm Name: Crg.CkSid.'X.0 m........................................................................................ County: t)a.Y.idsazn........................................... ...SROS's.......
OwnerName: Ha .............................. 336475A24 ............................ all&atq.................................. ........................... Pone o:
. . . ...............................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:........................................................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 211..WJh!tRhaft.S.Chu9J.Rsk............................................................... 1119I MsAlk..SIC................................ .. 2.730.0 ..............
OnsiteRepresentative: .......................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
1 ��.s�lAtkt.. t;�tic�.xi�Intk.amta.Mkd ax.Sshta�l [ask...l:kt.QinkR.l'4't>ilt�ext;�tf k Sslta ua.ask...asx.ktaltslr..arx.sigblk. ......................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
;®`Saline ❑'Poultry ❑ Cattle U❑:Horse
,Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine tCanackv 'Ponulation Poultry Ca acity Population Cattle �Canacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
300
0
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
1[3 Layer ❑ Dairy
[3 Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total'Design Capacity 300
Total`SSLW 129,900
`Number of Lagoons l 0olding ,Ponds / Solid Traps
M
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes []No
b. It' discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes.. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If dischar-.,c is observed, what is the estimated flow in uallmin?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? El Yes ®No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name Meiissa'Rosebrock Sue White
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

Facility Number 29 -- 39 agoon Number 1............ Lagoon ratifier E�.y..hq�$�
O Active 0 Inactive Latitude 35
Waste Last Added0/94 ........................................... Longitude F807 07 13
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map7
GPS file number: IS021115A
Surface Area (acres): R.,.5.3........................
Embankment Height (feet): 1.1T.......................
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet O 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes # No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): O < 5 O 5 - 10 0 > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes *No O Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): 24
inspection date .2/11 /2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 86
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
*Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
ication equipment
and/or Sprayfield O Yes
unavailable
comments
fail to make contact O Yes • No
0 NO O Unknown with representative
71

vision of Water Quality
vision of Soil and Water Conservation •
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 29 39
Permitted 0 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ■ Registered Date of Visit 1 2/11/20OO
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: $111.9.4.............
Farm Name: Uekxdg..k:arm ........................................................................................... County: V.a.yjdst?Xt........................ .W. ...................Sti.O........
Owner Name: Sma t...................................... HarjrjS ......................................................... Phone No: 53..6 475-C243......
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:...........
Mailing Address: 2� t. lei'ilit�i>cX.S�I�Q�1.psi.................................................
Phone No:
1htQxtuas xitl 1.P...),!1C.................................................. 27360 .............
OnsiteRepresentative; ........................................................................................................... Integrator:................................................................................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Swine C:anacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
300
0
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 300
Total SSLW 129,900
Number of Lagoons 11 Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0
Discharges & Strea Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signal
White
Date:
Printtd on:
Gov

Facility Number 29 — 39 it goon Number .1............ Lagoon IItifier By -hoses ............................................
O Active 0 Inactive Latitude K-1 FYI 38
Waste Last Added 8/1/.94............................................ Longitude P-1 M 13
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated By GPS or Map? IN GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IS021115A
Surface Area (acres): p, ........................
Embankment Height (feet): 1.17........................
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet 0250 feet- 1000 feet OQ >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement []Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? O Yes (*No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): O < 5 O 5 - 10 OO > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes *No O Unknown
Inspection date 2111 /2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear p
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): O �'
embankment condition O poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
*Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
ration equipment fail to make contact Yes 0 NO
and/or Sprayfield O Yes 0 No O Unknown with representative
unavailable
comments

•
i r M tr 1 p � laFtaL. LL♦ iJ aila YLLl6LFV itllLalaf B­,
�r,4 t� tT^ �,t^ .i ��!!
X�.. �1�+mf,
Initial Evaluation Q Follow-up Evaluation 0 Denied Access 13 Does Facility Require a Follow-up
Facility Number FpimWaof Evaluation tr!
c of Evaluation El= 24 hr. (irh;mm)
0 Permitted [3 Certified ® Registered ❑ Non -Registered N61nactive Facili Date Last Operated: (�
�J
Farm Namsi w, �t° , �,�.., � �w�„„». �,u.„„ . County:....._. 1. t'-L .(�.. ... .....................
Owner Name:.......... n._......._.t. r% j.. J....._.._........................ Phone No:.....>�.. �.f .:_q
Facility Contact: ... ..... __._._...»..».__.W_........... .......^..»Title:...._......_.._ ----------
Phone No:......»„».......... „...._.....
htailingAddress:. ,!._!,..... .�..�. ia�f... ...._. � L�. i1..».. ..................... r✓••atat•�i!..�.r..'e.�.._!_"..� Or
• Onsite Representative: .».... ............ »................ _............... _.................. _................ _.... Integrator: _..».._ ...... _...... _......................................... ..................
Location of Farm;
Swine
Design Current
CU'VACRY Po ulation
Design Current Design Current
E3 Poultry C2PUCity Po uladon E3 Cattle- Ca acih. Po ulation
Layer ❑Dairy
10 Non -Layer ❑ Nvn•Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
arrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑Bogs
+ ::Nurubei• of Lagodns'.:
:.Number of Holding Ponds !Solid Traps
Discharxeq &[ Stream Im nets
1. Is any discharge observed from any lagoon?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (if ycs, notify DWQ)
c. Vdischarge is observed, what is the cstirnated flow in galhnin?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any lagoon?
Waste Collection & Treatment
3. Estimate Freeboard Level:
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identi!ier: .I1. ...L�lj.{%� � .................._....._......
Freehoard (inches) _ .� ILt ........._..................................
❑ Spillway
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes XN-
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes X0
El Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
ReviewerlImpector Name 7
Reviewerfins eclor Signature: Date: Q Q Q

0
Inactive Lagoon Field Data Sheet
Facility Number: ®-® Inactive Lagoon Number:
Latitude M. ®' M" Longitude $Q 6- ' 13 JYGPS ❑ Map
4. Waste Last Added (mm/yy) *wncr ❑ Estimated �g
5, Estimate of lagoon surface area (acres)
6. Effective height of embankment (feet) 3
7. Distance to Blue Line or Intermittent Stream (feet) ❑ < 250 ❑ 250 - 1000 > 1000
Determined From Field Measurement ❑ Map
8. Down Gradient Well
a Is there a down gradient well located within 250 feet?
❑ Yes o
b. Is an intervening stream not located between any part of the lagoon and the nearest well? 10 Yes o
9. Distance to WS waters or HQW (mi.) ❑ < 5 ❑ 5 - 1 > 10
10, Does the representative know of overtopping from outside waters? 10 Yes No ❑ Unknown
11. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
a. Sludge Near Surface
b, Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
c. Lagoon Liquid Clear
12. £mbankmenl Condition
a. Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, etc.
b. Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
c. Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
13. Outside Drainage Area
a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
b. Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
c. No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
14. Liner Status
a. High Potential for Leaking. No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, etc.
b. No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
c. Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
15. Application Equipment and/or Sprayfield Not Available
16. Contact could not be made with on -site representative
I
rm
r�
■
0
El
❑ Yes No ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes No

Comments (Refer to Question #): Explain any Yes answer and/or any other comment.
2ov 1± SO?-1 45A
L&Gj Lac�ZM &o,4 �SAcv3 IZD

•
Site Sketch Showing All Active and Inactive Lagoons
ILEF

WtTI4.ww
O^OT'13ww
BMT13.ww
! rl2WW
MT712arW
W-0711 BWW
*VU.x ar
3s•s3.z.ar
35'3.r.1.W
33WQ.W
+
+
+
+
+
+
35'63'.0
36.6339.l0"
+
I
+
+
+
+
Davidson County Inactive Lagoon
Surface Area 0.33 acres
Lat/Long
Scale 1:500
021115a.cor
WGS 1984
N
2111 /2000
4
84.00
T
Pathfinder Office
0 Trimble
US Survey Peet

State of North Carolina!
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Charles Harris
Creekside Farm
211 Whitehart School Rd
Thomasville NC 27360
Dear Mr./Mrs. Harris:
C>F_=HNF1
RECEIVED
December 10, 1996 N.C. Dept. of EHNR
DEC t 3 1996
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 29-39
Davidson County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 214 .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your operation's
animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not require registration
for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not reach the
surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be required to obtain a
waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the surface waters of the state
will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed below,
you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level. Threshold
numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry_30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff at
[phone] ext 502.
Sincerely,, ^
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Winston-.SalemtWateriQuaiitysRegionahOf ice
Davidson Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper