290018_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Qua
ity
RECEIVED
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
N.C. Dept of ENR Dee Freeman
Governor Director
NOV 2 5 2009 Secretary
November 23 , 2009
Winston-Salem
Regional office I
Vance Yokeley
Eagle Hill Farm, LLC
3627 Gumtree Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Subject: Receipt of Lagoon Closure Report Form
Eagle Hill Farm, LLC
1D: AWD290018 (deemed permitted)
Dear Vance Yokeley:
On November 23, 2009, the Aquifer Protection Section received a completed Animal
Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form from your facility. This form indicates
that all lagoons have been closed in accordance with NRCS standards and that no animals will
remain on this farm. There is no permit to rescind since this operation was deemed permitted
according to 15A NCAC 2T .1303.
Please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-3221 if you have any
questions regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
J. R. Joshi
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Davidson County Soil and Water Conservation District
AWS Permit File — AWD290018
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location; 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone; 919-733-32211 FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-871-623-6748 North Carol i n a
Internet: wuuw.ncwaterquality,org Naturally Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employ6r

•
•
Rosebrock, Melissa
From:
Lloyd Phillips [[e-mail]]
Sent:
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 3:52 PM
To:
Rosebrock, Melissa
Subject:
FW: Available N in compost - calculations
Melissa,
As we discussed/
Lloyd
From: McGinnis, Michelle S [ma !Ito: Michelle. [e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:37 PM
To: Lloyd Phillips
Cc: Cleveland, Brenda R
Subject: Available N in compost - calculations
Hi Lloyd,
The equation used to determine available nutrients from a solid waste sample is below.
Available N (lbs/ton) = [nutrient concentration (mg/kg) 11,000,000] x availability coefficient x 2000 x
(DM%1100)
The nitrogen (N) concentration is quantified by laboratory procedures. The N available for the first
year (or season) is a calculation which includes an estimate of the availability coefficient. (The
availability coefficient is a percent of nutrient that will be available). The availability coefficient is
determined by the type of waste and the method of application. As we discussed, for the waste code
LDS and an application method of soil incorporation, the availability coefficient for N is 0.6. For a waste
code of FCD and an application method of soil incorporation, the availability coefficient for N is 0.5.
However, for a very stable, composted animal waste material, the NCDA availability coefficient is high
and over estimates the amount of plant available N (we take the conservative approach with respect to
environmental protection). According to the scientific literature, a stable composted material has an
available coefficient of 0.10 to 0.15. (I can forward you peer reviewed journal references if you would
like.)
So, for the results in report W1981 (FY2010) using an availability coefficient of 0.15, a calculated 3.19
lbs N per tons of compost are plant available.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Michelle McGinnis, Ph.D,
Agronomist, Plant/Waste/Solution/Media Section
Agronomic Division, NCDA&CS

[phone]
michelle.mcginnis �ncagr.gov
www.ncagr.gov/agronomi
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
If you are not the intended recipient, you must destroy this message and inform the sender
immediately. This electronic mail message and any attachments, as well as any electronic mail
message(s) sent in response to it may be considered public record and as such subject to request
and review by anyone at any time. It also may contain information which is confidential within the
meaning of applicable federal and state laws.
Davidson County Government, PCB Box 1067, Lexington, NC, USA, www.co.davidson.nc.us

State of North Carol
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 17, 2000
Vance Yokeley
3627 Gum Tree Road
Winston-Salem NC 27107
" 0 PW� 0
AIV 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVERQNMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Eagle Hill Farm
Facility Number 29-18
Davidson County
Dear Vance Yokeley;
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Rankin
1 0.93 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 'telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk* •
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Winston-Salem Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry Coble
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Davidson County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
.Facility File

lVlStOn Of WatEC Qttality + , M, a >
- -� a
v xE ivtston of Sotl :and Water Conservation ��
Y< r � � O'..Other Agency � �, � 3 '•�- .. 4 r Ya f -;4'c ` a .`.9f� � n f cs� �: �bx 4s � cs za ' .
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review +O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 29 18
0 Permitted © Certified 13 Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date of Visit 2J11/2000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold 1 Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: glt<.D II. k t<1C1liX................................. .................................................. County: Da.Y.ISiSQ7n........................................... M. R ........
OwnerName: Y..g,[tg...................................... ypkelpy ...................................................... Phone No: 336:c.7.G9.:�f?.7.3........................ ...............................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: 3f.2.7..G.utut,jrge.Road........................................................................ W..irlStctnt-Salem... NC........................................... 2.7.107..
Onsite Representative: ...................................................................................... Integrator:
Location of Farm:
X1Ye� ..1t12.&R11Xb fJI QAI]. �3'ant5tlPllv...xC�1 nAs&St.afk�lC i}aY.lirS9h �QIIkAIIJ .oaf«... x ?.II[I11111aS.'�Sk.pi?, .X Q9..Q1R.1�17[t. f Cat ,..............................
❑:Swine ;❑ Poultry ®Cattle .❑ Horse
Design 'Current
"Swme Uapacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design lCurrent
Poultry ;Capacity Population :Cattle -Capacity Population
❑ Layer ® Dairy 0 0
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy 30
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 0
TataI'SSLW 0
Number,of1agoons Holding -PondsTSolid Traps 1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If ves. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c, if dischanue is observed. what is the estimated Aow in Lml/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name M,61issaiRosebroek 'Sue`White
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

Facility Number 29 — - lagoon Number j....,,...... Lagoon ratifier1.q.W...bim........................................
O Active OQ Inactive Latitude 3- 67 00 7j 013
Waste Last Added Q/..1.1{.40............................. Longitude 80 10 44
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated By GPS or Map? ® GPS . ❑ Map
GPS file number: S021114A
Surface Area (acres): Q,g ........................
Embankment Height (feet): .1,Q,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet O 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement [--]Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? O Yes OQ No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles):# < 5 O 5 - 10 O > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes *No O Unknown
Spillway *Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): 18
�I
Inspection date 2/11/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 69
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
*Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
OO No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
OQ No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact
and/or 5prayfield OQ Yes O No O Unknown with representative O Yes Op No
unavailable
comments #15. No equipment but could hire someone to pump.

3 vision of Water Quality
vision of Sol] and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 29 1$
0 Permitted ❑ Certified Q Conditionally Certified ■ Registered Date of Visit 1 2?11/2000
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold Date bast Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Eagle.01L.Falu...................... County: Dayidson ..........................................
Owner Name: Ya> m..................................... ,X.Qkelcy...................................................... Phone No: 33.fit769:..9Q.7,3 ..........................................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 3627...Gt=.jj:ee.lto&d.........
Mukta-Saltm..NC........................................... 2.7.10 .............
OnsiteRepresentative: ...................................................................................................... Integrator:................................................................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Swine Canaetty Panulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacitv Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I Dairy 0 0
❑ Non -Layer I 1 ❑ Non -Dairy I I 3707d
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 0
Total SSLW 0
Number of Lagoons Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field Cl Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melis a Rose ck Sue White
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /jo
,5z & / �� Printed on: 4/11 /2000

Facility Number 29 — 18 Wgoon Number ............ Lagoon I tifier Ugfaw.Darns.......................................
0 Active O Inactive
Waste Last Added 3/./2.0.aQ.....................................
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated
Surface Area (acres): p,Q ..........
Embankment Height (feet): 1.Q.,7..........
Latitude 36 1 as 13
Longitude P6-1 El 44
By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IS021114A=
Distance to Stream: 0 <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet OQ >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? 0 Field Measurement []Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes* No
Intervening Stream? O Yes0 No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): OQ < 5 0 5 - 10 0 > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes* No O Unknown
Inspection date 2/11/2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
Op Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 69
embankment condition O poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
OO Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fall to make contact Yes NO
and/or Sprayfleld 0Yes 0 No 0 Unknown with representative
unavailable
comments #15. No equipment but could hire someone to pump.

Initial Evaluation Q Follow-up Evaluation 0 Denied Access 13 Does Facility Require a Follow-up
Facility Number ff,�at"-f
Evaluation
or Evaluation 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted 0 Certified Registered 0 Non -Registered ❑ Inactive Facility Date Last Operated . ............... „,„,,,,„
La
F�] � County:
M A
Faris Nam%; i..>77f.". t j�u ...xwx xwwwww4w
Owner Name:�L., e_ i�—-----...—. Phone No:
Facility Contact: „Phone No:
Mailing Address: �`^ e Wy s +
Onslte Represcnlative:._._. _...._ . .^_........_ ... _ _ ...._.. Integrator.
Location of Farm:
1Dealgn ti' Current:'=.::
Swine r•L:..Ha,., it
e
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
El Farrow to Finish
`
" TotalID Desk
�: ° • .....'.. ........ ; 7
Gilts
Boars
H ..
. CapaclitT
4 f
OLA� S Sif.W -.�
I
r
4
_ ::.... .._. N��.diHdlding�ondsfSobd!fraps- •I �* " !
Discharges & Stream lmnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any lagoon?
❑ YesIo
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (if yes. notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Row in gallmin?
2. is them evidence of past discharge from any lagoon?
❑ Yes N0
////���`
Wuste Collection & Treatment
3. Estimate Freeboard Lrvzl: Spillway
0 Yes 0 No
tructure I SlrUett[re 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure fi
Identifier, aIA�

•
Inactive Lagoon Field Data Sheet
Facility Number: ®-® Inactive Lagoon Number:
Latitude ®' Longitude
❑ Map
4. Waste Last Added (mmlyy) A Owner ❑ Estimated
IYGPS
D gg
5. Estimate of lagoon surface area (acres)
0. 3
6. Effective height of embankment (feet)
Q
7. Distance to Blue Line or Intermittent Stream (feet) ❑ < 250 ❑ 250 - 1000 a 1000
-71
Determined From Field Measurement ❑ Map
8. Down Gradient Well
a. Is there a down gradient well located within 250 feet?
Yes No
b. Is an intervening stream not located between any part of the lagoon and the nearest well?
❑ Yes No
9. Distance to WS waters or HQW (mi.) <
5 ❑ 5 - 10 ❑> 10
10. Does the representative know of overtopping from outside waters? ❑ Yes No ❑Unknown
11. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
a. Sludge Near Surface
❑
b. Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
c, Lagoon Liquid Clear
12. Embankment Condition
a. Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, etc.
b. Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
c. Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
❑
13. Outside Drainage Area
a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
❑
b. Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
❑
t. No Drainage Area or Diversions Well
Maintained
14. Liner Status
a. High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, etc.
b. No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
c. Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
15. Application Equipment and/or Sprayfield Not Available Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
16. Contact could not be made with on -site representative ❑Yes No

Comments (Refer to Question #): Explain any Yes answer and/or any other comment.
Po v File -9 qA
0
CIS. No 4-9gU,�?Iri�� ��f pan -here
SOmeooe. -& Pump.

•
Site Sketch Showing All Active and Inactive Lagoons
d
40
M
4
1•
ILEF

60'10w Ww
awsgt .O
a0•/P
w1g41 ww
4V17.OwW a0`10'�aOfN'
Oa00'21.00'
+
—1—
Iu.OVW
Oa'00XW
—1__
+
+
+
_I—
aa�1900'
+
+
1
36'Wla,ar
35-Wi 2.ar
. I
-r
+
I-_
_ I-
r
ae�mea.
Davidson County Inactive Lagoon
Surface Are r0.93 acres
Lai/Long
WGS 1984
Scale 1:1000
s021114a.cor
. N
2J11/2000
0
l25.0
T
Pathfinder Office
US Survey Peet
0 Trimble