175002_INSPECTIONS_20171231

State of North Carob
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 17, 2000
Ronald L. Daniel
215 Danielbs Dairy Road
Blanch NC 27212
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA (DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Daniel Farm
Facility Number 17-5002
Caswell County
Dear Ronald L. Daniel;
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Ranking
1 0.82 Medium
2 0.11 Medium
3 0.07 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk •
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Winston-Salem Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry Coble
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Caswell County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

�r vlslon,of WateQuallty' E,' vF 9 r xx< I r ,.
f �zw7� IVISlion ofSOil,and WatQr ConservatloII tii .t rf+ 3�T` �1' 4ri�»r
e '4:
1Yt � � ;�j.a 5. .. �,::�-�' .::.sue%,: a.�&,.�60therA enCp Asia. .. `�:�^ 5 -'S ^�...: ..'�. .,.� --Ya Y' .+'3e ��' 1•"f k�',�� �ti�x. =.'�
-7it. . 'r •�rt�.,r Ar. e.
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint Q Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other © Denied Access
Facility Number 17 5002
0 Permitted E3 Certified Q Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date of Visit 1r24/20U0
140 Not Operational Q Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 11119.2.............
Farm Name: Rnnipl.k'arm ..........................--. ........, County: Cas.w.c1.....--....................................... Y.SRO ........
OwnerName: RQnatld.L............................. Maid................................. ................ Phone No:---------------........................................................-----...........
Facilitfy Contact...................................................... ...............Title Phone No
Mailing Address: 21S.I2salxQl.'.�.1?ail► lDsifl................................................................. VIARC11,AC ............................................................. 27;12 ..............
OnsiteRepresentative:.........................................................................................----..------------ Integrator: .............. .................. ......................................................
Location of Farm:
Extd.Qf.Q:mtnPl:.Q11.k:UM.RQAda.........................................................................................................................................................................................................
•--.-•-•...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................... .............................................. ............................................................................................................................... ........................................ .... ........... _.......
: .
.® Swine 13 Poultry ❑Cattle :❑ Morse
Design Current
'nwtne Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 0
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population 'Cattle +Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity ;
Total SSLW
Number of.Lagoons 1 3 ..Holding Ponds /'Solid Traps
Discharges S Stream Inipac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. li' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-tnade'?
b. 1f discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If dischar-,e is observed. what is the estimated flog in eallmin?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
I Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
a _ t
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne Curtner v, y,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

Facility Number 17 -- 5002 agoan Number 1.. LagoonjIntifier f11 YV.t........
0 Active 0 Inactive Latitude 36 27 58
Waste Last Added 1/1/2.................................... . Longitude 79 16 55
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated By GPS or Map? IN GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: S012417a
Surface Area (acres): Q,.62........................
Embankment Height (feet):..5.............................
Distance to Stream: O ¢250 feet O 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? []Field Measurement ®Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): 0 < 5 0 5 - 10 OO > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes Da No O Unknown
Spillway *Yes ONO Adequate Marker O Yes ONO
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
inspection date 1 /24/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 60
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
*Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
OO No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
pplication equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield 0 Yes 0 NO 0 Unknown with representative O Yes 0 No
unavailable
comments ---Date of last operation per Caswell SWCD Staff

Facikit'y Number 17 — 500,Lagoon Number 2.........,.. Lagoon i ntifier QId..p....................................
0 Active 0 Inactive
Waste Last Added 11.1./.9.0 ...........
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): :.1.1..................
Latitude 3 2_ ? 04
Longitude 79 16 154
By GPS or Map?EN GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IS012417a
Embankment Height (feet): 7..................................
Distance to Stream: 0 <250 feet 0. 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ® Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes 0 No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): .0 < 5 0 5 -10 0 > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes *No O Unknown
Spillway *Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Inspection date 1 /24/2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 1
embankment condition (* poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
plication equipment fail to make contact and/or Sprayfield 0 Yes * NO 0 Unknown with representative 0 Yes O No
unavailable
comments -Notified DWO of freeboard level for their action
-Date of last operation per Caswell SWCD staff based on construction of new lagoon
E-T-1

Facility Number 17 -- 5002 Wgoon Number ............ Lagoon tifier QI-I.$QQ.Qrldaru..................................
O Active 0 Inactive Latitude 367 128 05
Waste Last Added.1/1/9.0...................................
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): Q.7 �...................
Embankment Height (feet): 7............. I ........ I ..... I...
Longitude 79 16 °55
By GPS or Map? JE GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: JS012417a
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement 0 Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes O No
intervening Stream? O Yes 0 No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): O < 5 O 5 - 10 0 > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes *No O Unknown
Spillway O Yes *No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Inspection date 1 /24/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 1
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
ication equipment fall to make contact
and/or Sprayfield O Yes 0 No O Unknown with representative O Yes 0 No
unavailable
comments -Notified DWQ of freeboard level for their action
-date last operated per Caswell SWCD staff based on construction of new lagoon.
11WI

--
JLL-14-1995 15'34 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO W-v
Site Requires Imtokate Attention: .
Facility No.
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT .
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS Sim VISTTAnoN RECORD
DATE:. /a - 17 1995
Time:
Farm Namc/Owner:_ eo .*�- ld I -
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: �� ta_4 ,�.,'�,f _ - Phone. 23z- zZ/?)
Physical Add=0,ocatiort:
Type of Ciperation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Cartification Number: ACE___ __ DEM Cwification Number: ACNEW-
Latitude: 2G ' 2 L -' S� " Longitude: .�' _ ' . k s' Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient fiwboard of i Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: ___FL inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is ani=W warm land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments. 4- 1
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL F.02

17-
C;;D
CD

OPEP.ATI01,1S 3RANCH — IJQ Fax:
Jul 25 ' 95 7.47 P. 18/29
SRQ =me f zr=diste Mtznd"
I+acility Iamb! -- -
SI , E'VMTATILO ' RBCCRTS r'1 [vo ,�(
�+�. f' ".-. '1 s
JUL 24 fq,:5
Owner, 1-tM Nam=
County;-...Q'a ��� .. - _ S01L�& VIAT E�r�
Agent Viaitl-ig Sit= kJARREXJ M-, Oc,!Cy_ , BAR f "Em' Fhon :
4, i --7 2-10
Cn she Reprnccntacivo:
Mysicai Addrus,
I fuidrngA►:dress: =' I 7a.r.j.r-r_='_ _gyp;, -
Type oa' CPC -fa aon. Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Ccsign CaP&city; _ _- _ ?Number of Animals on Sitt: _ D
11 tirade — Cp o � 22 �0--- Lcfl;iwdc, _ 72 o J (1 2— K
Tye; of ?r.s Ctian: Ground ✓ Aerial
Cire?s YQ2 or NC
laca ;,:,e Anuzz-i `,VA5'e i 3cCn _4e ��c:crce�or_ of tact �-S Ye£r_4':cctr s;orza avCut
I Fwt � r inc..es) (Ss)or No Acl4t:zl r =Cfl-.ro. :4 __Intc►ut;
i or faciirtie,, wil ;more < = Ma :�t�c rYs, VI=ft addMss Etc f.ndcr the
GVII ny-nits ";ect oa.
Wns any �nagc aGser: i zMr �: :'agoXds or io `,Vag `l.c.;, c:cEi4a �:.:�?: YG+ a s
is adt:xua;c 1 a M avaflabIt fbr 1,zr.d �{lCuLkn'' 5 r No:s :hc cu.yc- croc .�fr� as , ffl.�S)ar No
A��it:vnr.E �'on Tt]eR45;i6�^!'/!!
..
i? �
,(+.Ic'3 � �fJ,c'�.+.L"� � ^ •�F^�/ ��, �'I'J �• � n.-r� c
,�',r?n e. r � iJ
Cn1 Tf�� ��1.,..,� � :�
%% to (919? 11 `-35 `n