050001_INSPECTIONS_20171231

liv�r�nn of Water fluali4t�
JM tM66tof S6i1!RandMAter°C6iis.6fvati
Other^Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number OS O1 ❑ate of Visit: 01/07/2003 Trine: 1040
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above 'Threshold:...........
Farm Natne: Glizi�...CllxAs.Gr.�ieAie..�ax�tx................................ ........... County: Mbig ................................................... W...SAiA........
Owner Name- Cliiuc..&CbxA�..................... uetae....,.................................................... Phone No: 33.6-8.77:4.83.5............... ....,.,.....,..:.........,................
..
Mailing Address: U2.. IJx�. EtatntA.lt�............................ ....... Fleet.wo.Qd..NC...................................................... ..............
FacilityContact: Qxh.Grgg]Utr.................................................. .fitle:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: Gfir.iS..Gr.cc 1g...............................................................
Certified Operator:%ylgbj.0........................ t&lAfr................................
Location of Farm:
Integrator: ................................
Operator Certification Number: 19793.....................
Location: Take Hwy. 421 north to Hwy. 221. Travel north on Hwy. 221 to Idlewild Road. Turn right onto Idlewild Road. +
So. 2.5 miles to Pine Swamp Road, Turn right onto Pine Swamp Road. Farm is located at the first house on Pine Swamp
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude 1 81 F 28
Design Current
Swine Capacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
300
62
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 300
Total SSLW 40,500
Number of Lagoons ID Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is obsen ed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon'systeiii? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes N No
Waste (:ollection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .Pi1.twder.rnofed.................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 24
05/03/01 ontiritied

Facility Number: 05-01 * Date of Inspection 01/07/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, ere erosion,
❑ Yes
®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
❑Yes
®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
It. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Timothy, Orchard, & Rye Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
IN No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
2 L
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any,recommendations 4or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): , . Field Copy ® Final Notes
#.9, IT, 22., 26., & 32. Not applicable to this facility at this time.
+
15. Most all fields are need lime per 2002 soil analysis report. Looks like all fields had a good stand anyway.
19. Most recent waste analysis was sent last week. Check next visit.
25. Landfill has not been added to mortality checklist even though operator has been taking some there in the past. Has only been buring
mortality in the last year. May want to add "landfill" to checklist.
8/27/02 waste analysis = 11.8 lbs. NI1000 gal.
er/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock
E
er/Inspector Signature: Date:
0510.3101 f I Continued

Facility Number: 05-01 of Inspection 01/07/2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation'?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
,Additional Comments and/orDrawings;
AL
O5103101

i 1oRn�
E "Pik I RE -: � �� , E iyi` ;', E s�' i Ll�'l,j{{1L Vi TT a{Gf 1,Gi1�7f11�' -€ i'.s F€i s �•,���'= �-. -'�lif
Soil�and Water Conservation t
14 it Outer L G}r
t:�.tag ;,.,�? ,: , iF"Y�:rruo
Type of Visit 90 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
facility Number Hate of Visit: 1111= Time:
N t O erati nal 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: il,� 1 n e q- CIS reen�, Fa ny) County: A:5 h Owner Name: 1 e- `� Ch r 5 , ,,. u reen -e— �1 , Phone No: 33 4 . g 7 7 ,I • ` -q 3T
Mailing Address: 30 Pine- 5 LO01MQ t ` A ' 1 F lei r U y- 0 2 $6
Facility Contact: _{ --h r [__s (S ra ae_ _ Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative, 116p (oree_ae _ Integrator:
° +9713
Certified Operator: � � Ir'e��l e— -- Operator Certification Number.
Location of Farm:
wY ZI no . wY
on rW5
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ®' ®« Longitude ®'
S n ;Design Current '' Ca acitv3:pCurrenf Design Current
wme'3',E Ca acity Po ulahon Poutt a ulation. Cattle , a" achy :`Pa u ation ,
[] Wean to Feeder ❑ La er ' ❑ Dai ?
eerier to Finish '�F❑ Non -La er ❑ Non -Daily
, y3 ❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Other
Farrow to Feeder I
Farrow to Finish ; _
Total Design Capactty
0Ciilt5
[] Boars € ;.' „ E,. ; , 'Tofitfs 5L'Vh; e 6
f
' ( Number of Lagoons ,' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area S rav Feld Area E`
g p ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
i
Elo[din fonds I�Solid'Tra s s� r
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 9No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I�-No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ZtNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ,_RLNo
Structure 1 5trvcture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Pif f
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Contdnued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
A'igo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
El Yes
hRo
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
`'C ` o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
`C Y
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
9No
11. Is there evidence of over ap lication9 ❑ Excessive ding ❑ PAN ❑ ydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
0No
0
12. Crop type --
13. Do the receiving crops differ with th a designated in the Certifie ni I Wast snag m t Plan (CAWMP
❑ Yes
No J
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
9 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0
Required Records & Documents
/
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
—9Yes --©-No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Manage m nt Plan readily available?
�(
t2
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, frcebewd, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
El Yes
No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
,4 No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
�No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
— E14:0+
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
O No
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments'(refer to question #) Explain'an GYrES a 'swers,and/or any recommendations or ny d her'comiients ` EL
I7se'drawings of facility to better explain situatinns a(use additlonaf.pages as necessary) �j il❑Finalte
ti Wit" ..,.3
Reviewerlinspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date:
05103101 L Continued

Facility number: — a Date of inspeclinn
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt..
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentitemporary cover?
N�o
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes 1KNO
❑ Yes )] No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes RNo
n .,__ xO
1 Zz ., a(0.+
�l
�P
aA.a(�'t�aC�t'
U
llss. N/ f000c�o.Q.
AIOWt-
'Ant P41V-1 jL14 4h,
t�ca (P.'�, t�ea-L,. acoa smi-0
05103101

Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: (>/20/2002 Time: 1230
Facility Number 05 Ol
NNot O erational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................
Farm Name: GAixacA..Cktlrits.G.rf: tr.Earm.....:....:..:......................... County: Aft .................................................... WSR.0........
Owner Name: Chute.A..Chirk..................... .Gumnti........................................................ Phone No: 336.477.4835 ..........................................................
MailingAddress: 307.Tjixe.Swamp.Rd.............. :............................................................. ..................................................... 2N.626 .............
FacilityContact: Chrk.G.run.................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:.--................................................
Onsite Representative: OAIt.C.R1 d Ch1' N Grtit~tl::...........:............................................. Integrator: l dokAlf)ent...........................................................
Certified Operator:I?wight.0.............................. Gregue ............................................. Operator Certification Number: I,9.7.93.............................
Location of Farm:
.ocation: Take Hwy. 221 to Idlewild Road. Turn onto Idlewild Road. Go. 2.5 miles to Pine Swamp Road. Turn right onto +
?ine Swamp Road. Farm is located at the first house on Pine Swamp Road (SR 1169)
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 17 14 Longitude $1 • 27 i 2$61
7�1.
P �?� Destgn
' '
- 7 va' ' - vmX �< - 4cii.� ttAdP, 'r ' s 0 A " J, k+J
Current ',. Destgn Current Designs 'Current'-
Swtne, Ca acit
Population Poultry`. Ca acit Po ulation Cattle }"'i a a
t,�Ca actt<<Po ulationl:`
Feeder
❑ Wean t�to
❑Layer ❑ Dairy
® Feeder Finish 300
293 ❑Non -Layer ❑ Non Dairy
❑ Farrow to Weany_r=tt'
❑Other'
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish:
T�otalDesign Capacity" 300
❑Gilts
# ❑Boars
y
4 ' Total SSLW{: 40 S00
�i':
ur Number of Lagoons
0 ❑ Subsurface Drams Present ❑ Lagoon Area 5 ra
--q ----` --- --.....__._._. ❑ P YField Arc.la
Holding Ptds /'3oltd Tra s
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System >,
Discharees & StreamImpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flaw in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection R& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ... Piumder.,bara... ..................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 24
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 05—01 Date of Inspection 6/20/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tree• ere erosion, Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Orchard Grass Hay Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[-]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
<1
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit -
Comments �reter to uesti n # : Explain any ES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
U drawings of facility o etter expiain situations. us additional pages as necessary : ❑Field Copy ® Final Notes
9. Not applicable to this facility.
_
15. 2002 soil analysis results were calling for time on several fields. Operator put lime on fields this year at one ton per acre.
25. Have technical specialist add "landfill" to mortality checklist.
Records look great!
ft Beth Buffington's name and number so that Chris could call to check on his certification renewal date and hours.
919.733.0026 ext.313
+
Meliss Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Name-40
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: A 5
O5103101 1
Continued

L
•Facility Number: 05-01 D ►f Inspection 6/20/2002 •
dor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
ALI
J
05103101

Type of Visit OkCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 9Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: a2G 6 e:
Not O nBlow Threshold
Permitted Certified 0 Conditiona11 Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: �G
0/` f a Q
Farm Name:Lii a vf� j rl ire County:
Owner Name: CI % "e- �- t✓1 1 r� Ire e n o-' Phone No:
Mailing Address: 0
Facility Contact: l nz `6' iq Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator: =Mee en
�1 rP Operator Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Swine - Capacity Population AujitrCa aci Po ulatian Cattle
Wean to Feeder La er ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish 0 ❑ Non -La er ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean „yam - —- --
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Design Current
Ca acl Po ulation:.
I .
[� I
j S0�
Number of Lagoons 10Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area j .;
--- - - --
/:So11d Traps �" ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Sys tem
�5+, $IialdingPonds
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes o
Waste Collection 8r Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ElSpillway
❑ Yes !lO No
tructure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier. r
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
Continued

i
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection I 1A ku 16
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an ❑ Yes XNo
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes kNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ElYeso
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes KNO
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with t se designated the Certified Animal Ate Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes oil�o
M. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? [IYes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? El Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes X No
Reauired Records &Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? --El *e"4944o
18. DoeePf,checX1i'tis,
acilitI to hall �ponents of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel design, maps, etc.) / �,� ❑ Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & so51 sample reports) ❑ Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes XNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 'XNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes X"No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ANo
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments :( efer toquestion .#} Explainrany YES'aiiswers andlor any recommendatinnsm Raw"
nr.,an ti her com etints r
al
Use drawings of facility, to better eap(aln�situations (use additional.pages as necessary) Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
s �
`-
73
Reviewer/Inspector Name � � r. °s; ,p� � U �e T Q . ;�z'
ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date: Q e —
05103101 t, } ✓ Continued

Facility Number: — Q Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i,e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan bladc(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes KNo
�10
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
733e ���d 30
oa a6
05103101

of Visit O Compliance Inspection @ Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O.Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
6acility Number OS j Dalc of Visit: 10/31l2D01 'Cirri.: 10:D0
I+lnt 0 �1b+►Tbtte�nld-
Permitted' 0 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: CH�ttGA.ChrkLG.rCxW.F8ttM......................_........................................ County: Ashe............................................ ..... MRO.... ...
OwnerName: Que.K.U&..................... Grmc .................................................... Phone No: 3 77AUS..........................................:................
Mailing Address: 39..7.Xju.Stt:amv.Rd..................................... ............. I-- ................... ....................................... .............
Facility Cealmo : Chth Ne,
01rr W I11hp atmfl�tlrirac . n& :.
Certified 0Ferator:Dvjghlt.G,...........:...............................::....................:........... Operator Certification Number: J9a93 ................................ .. .
Location of Farm:
Location: Take Hwy. 221 to Idlewild Road. Turn onto Idlewild Road. Go. 15.miles to Pine Swamp Road —Turn right onto +
Pine Swamp Road. Farm is located at the first house on Pine Swamp Road (SR 110) T
K Swins [J Paultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3ti ' 17 14 K Longitude 81 ' 27 28
Discharwv
1. Is any discharge observed from any pan of the operation? Q Yes Cff No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) QYes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated tlow'in gaUmin?-
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes QNa
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any -part of the operation? _ O Yes 11 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a dischatrpe CjYes KNo
Waste Collection A Treattreeeeet ,
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway _ Q Yes N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5• Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 15
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 0S-1 Date of Inspection 10/31/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trefavere erosion, [] Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes B No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (Q Yes 0 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Q Yes C&No
9. Do any stuctures lack'adequatel'gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? I ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0§ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Fescue,Timothy, Orchard
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [QYes ' ZNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? QYes �Pio
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 0 No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [:INo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 12 Yes' ENO-
16. Is tlteca a.lwk of adequate waste applicadon equipment? 13Yes NLNo
Acquired Recoahb & Decumen4s
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage 8t General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ' 0 No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(id W UP, chwllists, design, maps, e1r-) ❑ Yes NWo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) Q Yes KNo .
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? - ETYes' ff No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
222 Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) [Q Yes 9 No
23. Did lieviewer/Inspemtor fail todimmmiawlinspection with on -site represcntadve? QYes ILN6
Z4- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?. (3Yes UNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? a Yes a No
Q No riolatiarrs or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You wr7F mere nn &I ffiereorrespontleneettbbat this risit.
Mg-M.- men Irefe to u x annswerslan virecomniM[orrsor an ache cornmente.
t1 dra 'ngs o facitit tier ex sltuatia use ltionat pages as ac y Field Copy ClFinal Notes
aciiity and records are in good shape.
aste analysis: 10-16-01 LSS 8.5 lbs-NI1000 gals. B ,
7-26-01 LSS 6.9
2-14-01 LSS 3.5 „ "
I analysis dated 9- -01 had taro fields callingfor one tone of lime peracre.
ility has a slurry pitunderthe house. Realistic to have a marker. Mr.Grr ene can-measunfhim the slats dowryfrirefmcbeard
Le
asurement.
wer/Inspector Name Rocky Durhamwer/Inspector
E
Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

1+acility Number: OS-1 Di of Inspection 10/31/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? ,(i.e. residue on neighboring vegetatim,asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
N. is the system.intaimuc* bcaledmae tbe.liquid surface of Ihe.lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks Iack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
0 Yes {I No
ElYes. EFNo
❑ Yes 0 No
Q Yes CffNo
❑ Yes [QNo
05103101

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 5/9/200t Time; 1000
Facility Number OS 01
t0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted a Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.?/.1/.209......
Farm Name: C1ijte..&Chrk.Cxe9Ar..E.arM.................................................................. County: ANhe ................................................... W.SRQ.........
Owner Name: 0110R.&..ChriA..................... Gr.ewle .................
Mailing Address: N.7..?1nc.Sw..a P.Rd.........
Facility Contact: Cli>nte.atxd..Chrk.Q.r.wm.
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:JDWyAghj...
Location of Farm:
.. Title:............
.. frxewlr ...............................
Phone No: 336:.7.27.4835 ...................................:......................
l!eetw>?ash..�lG...................................................... 20626 .............
Phone No:
Integrator: ......................................................................................
Operator Certification Number: J9793....
.........................
vocation: Take Hwy. 221 to Idlewild Road. Turn onto Idlewild Road. Go. 2.5 miles to Pine Swamp Road. Turn right onto A
'ine Swamp Road, Farm is located at the first house on Pine Swamp Road (SR 1169)
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 •F 17 { 14 64 Longitude 81 ' 27 28
Discharees K Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection -& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ... P.it.under..harn................................................................................................................................................ .......
Freeboard (inches): 22
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
05103101 Continued

Facility Number:. 05-01 'Date of Inspection 5/9/2001
tl 5. Are there any immediate threats to the tissgrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑Yes
®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
® Yes
❑ No
Wastm AuRlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Timothy, Orchard, & Rye
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16,
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
. Not realistically possible to install a marker in the pit. Pit is covered with roof which is in good shape. Waste must be pumped out to
e applied. No flush system.
9. Records looked great as usual.
maintains approx. 60-75 beef cattle on various pastures at other locations. No water quality problems were observed.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
05103101
Date:
Continued

I
Facility Number: 05-01 Diff Inspection 1 5/9/2001 Printed on: 5/10/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
J
05103101

IVA
Ir'�i
I,
e z r r i , t� fl. j i ^^�r, 3hi
Type of Visit % Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:-'
Q Not Operational Below Threshold
0 Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..�.©.,.. a b
Farm Name: ... ...(%r "5....dreene......F nn.............. County:... Ee...... Q
Owner Name:...a�.�f I.��i�.. .4� 1 I�......�I!1..e.................................. Phone No: ......3 .!6.......F.73.....Y.o �...........
FacilityContact: ............. `. 5.....Grane .............. Title:........................................................... ..... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ............ M,3 ...... Pint ...... ...................... Fk.T .t...NC ..................... . .......A............
Onsite Representative:..... I .rvL.. .1 !! 'e- .. Integrator:.......... ....................
Certified Operator: .N•l, h........� ...(S.r44_, 1e..................... Operator Certification Number: ..... ��.���...............
Location of Farm:
0 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ®0 6 " Longitude ®' ©� ®49
aware
❑ Wean to Feeder
eeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
r7l rrpn
Poultry capacity Population Cattle C.
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 1[] Non -Dairy
❑ Other '
- 'Total Design'Capacity�
�r
Total SSLW
�Paci6 Pop a -don l;
t 31k
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area '`
i `Nermber of Lagoons -' ` ❑ t; ❑Spray Field Area �`.
Holding: Ponds 1 Solid'Traps` ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System i
Discharges & Stream Impactti
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originates! at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. II'discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
StrUClUrc I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: fatl..C.{nda- Ban.)..................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
S/00
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes�No
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: 0 T— d Date of inspection .r o printed on: 1/9/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats_ to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tree3rsevere erosion, E[Y,es XNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes XNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) .
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crokk differ with those designated in the Certi
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21: Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
00fjcaencies.•vvvre 0004• 0(whig 011SASIt; • X00 Xill -teceito 46 further
cariesuo>ndence: a�auti this visit. . .:::..............:.........:.... .
Comments,(Wer to question #): Explain any YES answers;and/oi
Use dravviings of fa. dli.ty;to better explain situations.,(use additiont
any; Tcommendiiitions orjany
i,pages as necessary):', ,3 ;,
❑ Yes'YNo
❑ Yes A No
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes El Yes CoN
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes [(No
❑ Yes )(,No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes [ No
❑ Yes X No
• 0 W1
9, Naf p os5 i b V-e p h P rf �o PPI 5, /2 o Ve
19 • Peeord,5 lDo jL r-P-0.4 a s uS ua j. W,4 roof 0W C h t5 t VLJ
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date: SM0

' 1 1
•I Facility Number: -- 0 [AW Inspection Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues V
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes YNO
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes VNO
s
ona omrnentsan or ra ngs: { �3,`` s 4 ,, , 1�
3 9> 9
5100
5100

Facility Number pS 1 Date of Visit: 11/15/20e0 'Time: 15:30
O Not O erational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted E Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................
FarmName: .................................................................. County: Ashg ................................................... WSRQ........
Owner Name: Ctiiat;A.Chrk..................... firumn ........................................................ Phone No: 33.6:4.77.4835 ..........................................................
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address: 397.. h1C.S.WAMV.Rtt...
Onsite Representative: DyVjgbi.G.rFxAC ...........................
..... Title:
..... Phone No:.......
F.1 t.w.9.Q t..NC..................................................... 20626....-----....
Integrator:. .............
Certified Operator:D.vight................................... cinvue ............................................. Operator Certification Number:19.723 .............................
Location of Farm:
Location: Take Hwy. 221 to Idlewild Road. Turn onto Idlewild Road. Go. 2.5 miles to Pine Swamp Road. Turn right onto +
Pine Swamp Road. Farm is located at the first house on Pine Swamp Road (SR 1169)
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude F 27 1 28 66
Design Current Poult , p
�.�� UDCurrent:; �' DesigCne Ca Licit P,o ulation r y� Ca P.o ulation Cattle Cy a selo ulatton n
Fr
❑ ❑Wean to Feeder ❑Dairy
®Feeer toinis300 132 ❑Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 300
❑ Gilts Total ❑ Boars ;' F ' SS W9' 40,500
I.
Number of Lagoons❑ Subsurface Drains Present © Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps 0 + ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
'
kk:
❑Layer
s'-
dFh
❑Non -Layer
Dis arees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made`? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Coll .fiction _& Irealment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure A
Identifier:
....................................
Freeboard (inches): 19
5100
❑ Yes ®No
Structure 5 Structure 6
...............................................................................
Continued on back

Facility Number: 05-1 Date of Inspection 11/15/200 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the rity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trJ*evere erosion, ❑ yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Timothy, Orchard Grass Fescue (Graze) Fescue ([-fay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
ReQuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
No•yiolations;or der ciencies.were:noted diitii ig-this• visit::Y6u'Will k4 c64*e.iro-fttirther- ;
correspondence' A' ' f this :visit: - : • : • : • : ::::::.:. :
and records are well kept.
y has a waste pit under the floor of the hog house and checks freeboard periodically.
analysis:10/25/00 LSS 7.8 Ibs.N/ 1000 gals. B
7/17/00 LSS 9.7 Ibs.N/1000 gals. B
Ill 1/00 LSS 7.2 Ibs.N/1000 gals. B
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Cl No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name �R koc y Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00

Facility Number: 05-1 Dof Inspection 11/15/2000
Odor Issues 0
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
6difijiOR,111am en en or rnw ngs:
5100
5100

i
Mile or Visit: 6/2on000 Time: c000 Printed on: 6/21/2000
Facility Number OS Ol
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
D Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered bate Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: .................................................................. County: Ashe ................................................... WSRQ........
Owner Name: Gila!~..#i.. ktltise.............. I ..... I Gr.rvjje......................................................... Phone No: 33.6A.77.483.5 ...........................................................
Facility Contact: GhriA.Grevin G.................................................. Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: 307..Fatm$.w.=P.JT d................................ ... ... FIetrt.W.Q.Qd..SIC...................................................... ZHU .............
Onsite Representative: GIxm,.ail Clint:,.(,trettkt.................... Integrator:
Certified Operator: Dmight.G,............................. Greene ............................................. Operator Certification Number: 19.7.93.............................
Location of Form:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 ' 17 { 14 i, Longitude 81 • 27 [ 28 64
Rischarees Stream Imp
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
_Waste Collection _. Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: Fat.undrr.barn.......................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 15
❑ Yes ® No
Structure G
Continued on back

Facility Number: 05-01 Date of Inspection 6/211/20O0 Printed on: 6/21/200D ►.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the Ority of any of the structures observed? (ie/ treloevere erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Aanlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Timothy, Orchard, & Rye Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Req ui red_Records-&D9cume nth
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Rio yiolatitids:or deFciencies•rvere'noted'during•this:vigit.•:You:will recewe-ip6-further-;
corresooridence abouf this:visit::::
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
closed out lagoon below old sow barn. Closed out according to NRCS guidelines. Seeded with orchardgrass. Was closed March I -
Pit beneath hog house has no outlets from hog house or pit. Waste level is checked visually each day and with a ruler/yardstick
xlically.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Meli sa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. / t 14 Auh Date:

Facility Number: 05- O1 Uif Inspection 6/20/2000 Printed on: 6/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No
J

A Ali
Division ofMiiW Water
E] Dtv�sion and Water of
sion of Water, Quiihty€ E
Other Agency - OperatiorJ
IQ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other �
Facility Number I)ate of Inspection D Oo
Time of Inspection DDD 24 hr. (hh:in
0 Permitted'�Kertified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
TQ r County: 8'5-. e.......................................1U..S..'a
Farm Name. ..:......f.........1!�P.............1................................................................
Owner Name:.1�h.r:a5.. ......G..). ..........[:l r..................I............... Phone No:...:. ................
Facility Contact: ...... 1..,.hr.'jrJ........... E_7.%'ee.n.b...............Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:.........30.7............ ......i...n..e.....S..t*.a-r4............. .... ........................FA'..e' oa, t'a .........
Onsite Representative: r....Qn e4). 1.....................Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:,,,,,„ .K....... �.�.,.,.,�.r�.�.%�.!?......................... Operator Certification Number:.... J-13 „�.,,,,,,,,,,
Location of Farm: v
�.V.t','.�....o..l......!.�5 .✓Cl'ilt .,:3....:3`1�.....�,..C3.1.....!.l�Jl......I.C.Li.........Ikr'l':1........a.�.... ..l..L ':ES... �l..f..� 7`. pl'J ........
rr.....r......�........:.....�..� ..........o...,....m..r.1Z-5......................:...................................................... .
Latitude E:W*E—Q]' Em" Longitude �❑• �� ��
Design Current Cae ag Current Desrgn, Current
- _. _
Swine€'f' ` €- Ga acit Population kou�try�,` �� y', Po'ulation"' Cattie :Ca acit 'po ufaton
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑ Dairy
, eerier to Finish JE1Non-Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean ,
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
;t F ,, � ��;
❑Farrow to Finish °€ t'f' '� Total Design Capacity.
E`
❑ Gilts,
3:
❑ Boars Total SSLW
€, Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ILI Spray Field Area
Holdln 3Ponds'/. Solid Traps €' � ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
s..i ®, , I
Discharees & Stream Impacts ,
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: Pl T
Freeboard(inches): ........... 1.9 ......... ........................................ ............... I ........ I ...... ....,`......................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/ 9
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
A No
❑ Yes
**No
❑ Yes A No
Structure 6
...............................
❑ Yes XNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: — a E.)f Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are nowproperly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the recei)
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
t5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reouired Records & Documents
I Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes XNo
AYes ❑ No
❑ Yes �K<o
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes oK No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes XNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes )'No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes $No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? []Yes 'VNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?.
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes P('No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes o
Rio yiola> ip s:o� cl�fic.encies were t to d�triitg :v... Yost ... �eeeiye �itk ]Fus er.
CO'irres�oridence: abaitt: this visit:
- .�.- i,.. k.. i'.' - -. .. ..
Comments (refer to question #} }Ekpiain any YES answers and/or`any re rnM"'endations or. any other comineitts "
Use,drawtngs of faciilEtyto better, explain srtuations (usaeEysdcltfronal pages as -necessary):,
P • [ - -5P F '=x VI1?3 tl.r P 3..." �. [! ';�.,:%rfn
Closed 00 l43oon' ���OLD, So&"3 ID.M C'-IOSej
O kA' (i_ _C.ord r 46
1s�� �d�.l+n�5.
! s l5 be,nea* 0SG (v/ Y1 b C)o of i>�-,5 �i-bY1� �1 bU S0-
vie
�c
ry 1 �a•�-d sire �- �.r,,^d, Q�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/inspector Signal
Ila
Date:
3/23199

IL g 41ty Number: ioof1iispection .
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below �f10
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? Dm I T dOCG
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes )�No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
)(No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
�No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
XNo
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a perm anont/temporary cover? OM17—
i tone , omments an or rawings:.
�, .. .,. .. J,.,,,
J
�Qnd St u�2�1 a,� Form5 ror P u ntip,� haUJ jp
3/23/99
0

NORTH CAROLINA i
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
TO:
FAX NUMBER
FROM:.
DATE:
D E N R'
FAX TRANSMITTAL.
Division of Water Quality
5$5 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27107
Phone: [phone]
Number of pages (including cover page): � �77
Fax: [phone]

c
d
Facility Number 05 1 Date of Inspection 12/16/99
Time of Inspection 10:00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered © Not Operationa-11 Date Last Operated:
FarmName: .............................................................. County: Ask .................................................... WSRO........
Owner Name: Clixtc....Cbrh......................Givake......................................................... Phone No: 910.477.483.5 ...........................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: 3.0.7.Tjnt9.S,rapt►P.Rd.......................................................................... E1g.Pt.w.o.Qd..NC ..................................................... UU6 .............
Onsite Representative: Cilltl�.thC1S.1CiAe............................................................ Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:I2W1gh1..0.............................. Gregap............................. ................ Operator Certification Number: 19.7.93.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 36 • 17 4 06 66 Longitude 81 ' 27 6 30 16
Di c� j& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection -& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Pit
Freeboard (inches): .......R...................................................
........................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed on 6/19/2000

r`
r.,
Facility Number: 05-1 1)at nspcetion
12f16199
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste anagement or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
IN No
12. Crop type Timothy,Orchard,BlueGrass(
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21,
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
46•violatioris.' deficiencies•rvere:noted'dWft19.!hi9 visit.• :You:.01 rec. ive•tnti ftirth;e'
:: ::::: :corres ofdenea ' thisvt. . :: : :i
17 Has just received the General Permit Application,
19 Last waste sample/analysis was from 1997. Need to get a waste analysis within 60 days of application. Also, need a annual soil
mple on all application fields.
verall operation looks good.
9eration has a pit under the hog house which is pumped into a spreader truck and applied to grass.
M
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on 6/19=00

Facility Number: OS-1 DatOispeclion 12/16/99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(�' onn [ �ommen Tari on '_raw nes:
w
Printed on 6/19/2000

13
Facility Nuinher Dur.e,11 Inspectioli
t-ilm. of loitillceiioll 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted of 0peratiou;i Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Cline.&.Cliris.Greciie.F.arm................................................................... County: Ashe WSRO
Owner Name: Cline.&.Chris..................... Greene ....................................................... Phone No: 33ft-A71-4835 ..........................................................
-acilify Contact: Clinx.Creme ..................................................`Title: Gymner ................................................ Phone No: -M,6-.,87.7-.41U5 .......................
Mailing Address: A0.7..Pint,e.&wamp:.tid........................................................................... Fleetwood ... NC...................................................... 2862fi ..............
OnsileRepresentative: Ciine,Gieel e.............................................................................. Inlegratol'.......,...............................................................................
Certified Operator:DWlight..C.............................. Grgeae .............................................. Operator Certification Number. 1979,3.............................
Location of Farm:
Latit ncic LongiIII dc ®�©
Swine . Capacity Population
[3 Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to can
p Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
w
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Layer d..pDairy
p Non -Layer p Non -Dairy
p Other
Total Design Capacity 300
Total SSLW ,
;Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds, [3 Subsurface Drains Presen--p agoon rep 13 pray ie rea
CI No Liquia Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated al: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. I I discharge Is observed, was the conveyance elan -made?
b. li'discharac is observed, did it reach Surface Water" ('11'yes, nioliiy DWQ)
C. 11,discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/:nin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoan system? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
13 Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
NIA
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No
//!-a,

act i y Number: 05_01 Dille of c lion
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures La poons.l-ioldiu p Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Slr'LICILI e 1 Structure 2 S11-ucture 3 Structure d
Identifier: Road House
Freeboard(li):...............1..5.......I......................15...............................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Aptfiication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
Structure 5
15. Crop type ....................... Fes= ...................... ... 1i1Uo1hy...Oxj;hard.,.&.Ryv...............................................................
Gra s
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the ,�nimal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities 00V
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
.. o,vio tons -or iciencies•were.nn a duriI'llng is visit., . Von. will .receive no' ur er. .
p Yes
® No
p Yes
N No
Strttctttru
6
p Yes
® No
p Yes
M No
p Yes
M No
p Yes
M No
p Yes
......................................
M No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Comments (refer: to question #) +Ezplatn�tiny, answers an or anyirecommen ations oria.ny of er commedntsf ;ti
dlj lr:. ., .I'Ev E �i ! •Il.lil, (,�.. in'i tRt E t :..dl < Ill ii it I '• 3 I }�.f. ! I:,E.� i! $F. �.l f i t.i' i ', ik'
Use§drawl1tnQb's' ofE facth{4 ,pto; titter eNx lain';sIitu�ations',,(use!adf[ditton(ai pagels,as necessary)
�.x4 s{ete} � d(ili. FYI i i i, ;4�i•rli% t e E I::.-.3siI8E§��1�;t�'�.,•L�'ii4�r§$.3�„�li��:i{,..�r
,tip-,.r,. _....-..,,r ..-, - ...... .. ..`...._«,..,....r.-_...,...p.....»..-......-..-....
Reviewer/inspector Name 'GeorgeSmiitF 2, !
;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

i.�
Division of Soil MWater Conservation [] Other
[I Division of Water Quality
10 Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 2 -P3-7
Facility NumberTime of Inspection O: � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered �tCpertified © Applied for Permit © Permitted 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:......[.!ti.C.....-.....�....... County:........N-t.....................................4'1/.5.!�.?...
OwnerName:........4......................... ....... (�t e'^ 4r..................................... Phone No:....116...........................
Facility Contact: ........ -r-G......�.................. Title:........ C................................ Phone No:...�a.......7T..rti.
/
MailingAddress:.........7...............rf7........,f.:........................................ ....��.. .: ..........
Onsite, Representative:........ ................ .....-...�............................................ Integrator:..................... ....
Certified Operator:............ Operator Certification Number;...... . U.7.13.
Location of Farm:
2. .... �?4.�.. X. ..1....... �r .�.... �..... ..�!:... .r! ... ........ ... .
......1..................-"-m1.....................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 0 6 41
-:Design
Swine Capacity
...
❑ Wean to Feeder
..... ..
Feeder to Finish
300
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Longitude
1f/ • G 3b
Design
Current
Design -Current
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle : '
Capacttj7.1 u' lation
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
s
Total Design Capacity
3 0 0
Ey
Total SSLW
ys Oo0
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes EKO
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I3l0
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man -.made? ❑ Yes (Trvo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes U10
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? Al
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 8'1�o
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®,,TKO
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes EKO
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes U"1*lo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 0<0
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes
7/25/97

Facility Number:—
j 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes MNo
Structures (LagoonsMolding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 93'<o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: f1Q.f�1Li............. .... dpvSC-
... .............................................................................................. ...............................
Freeboard(ft):...........L.S.............. ....... E: I'Ty.......... ... ......... ....................... ............................... ..... ..... ...............................
....................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
[9Io
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
BNo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[2-go
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
!
,�Vo
Waste Application
14,
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
Ull�o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type .......f�.tG.......................... .................................................................. ............. I.................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
Md<o
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ff),No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
[llo
19,
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0'<o
20,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�o
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
M"(40
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
9311 o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
01-1qo
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
(f10
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
U�K0
[OrNo'vio'lfitio'ni•'or'deficie'ncie's'w*e'r'e-noted-during this:Nisit.- Y_ou:will irecei've• no-fdrther" : "
. correspondence dliout-(his'vis.it:-
Reviewer/Inspector Name`' is q e 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��c,� _� Date:

DSWC Ani eedlot Operation Review
WQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
E
0 Routine O Cont aint O Follow -tie of DW2 inspection O Follow-u of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection�7-
Facility Number O f Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered !Id Certified 0 Applied for Permit U Permitted Q Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:..... ...........� 4.. -�� fir ....................... County �rltQ....
... ...... ....... ........ .h ................ ...... ..... .....
1
Owner Name: .......................................................... .. ............. PhoneNo: .......3.2&.*-..?.7.7.'..�.�3�-................
Facility Contact: ... .................. .............. Title ......... !as+�.............................. Phone No:...ti
Mailing Address:.........3.0..7........:.. ..... ............. / &(e............. .�.��G'.�...
Onsite Representative:.......................................................................... Integrator:................
Certified Operator* .....Cd� ............................... Operator Certification Number:...... �. ............
Location of Farm:
Latitude L d6 Ci Longitude ©• 27 1 30 i(
Design ..Current Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity ,Population . Poultry Capacity Population Cattle .,-,Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer ❑ Dairy
` Feeder to Finish 300 2 JE1 Non -Layer 1 ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity ,
300
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
qs 000
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds `� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Al
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes 14 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes l No
Dischar-e ori-inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, dill it rich Surface Water'? (II� yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes tQ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in eal/min?
N /0}
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes E9No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes [4 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes M No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes M No
mai ntenance/improve men t?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes Co No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes 14 No
7/25/97
Continued nor back

Facility Number: OS -- Ol* i •
'8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons,11oldine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes QQ No
restructure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...h�'..... p 0........yA,.cT.....8O'g .............................
Freeboard{ft): ..........!.! .. .EMPTY .............. ................,...................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes EO No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes R1 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? 9 Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes W No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crap type............................................................................................................................................... ....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWNIP)? ❑ Yes '] No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19, Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer./Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement'?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Oniv
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AW,MP'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
"No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ Yes
" No
No.violations or dericiencies4ere noted during this: visit.- .You.Wvill receive no further
coerespondence about this'.visit:. ."
erto question ) ,Explain any'YES aniwers and/or any recommendations or an
1 fuc lity,to better explain situations (ust additionalpages as necessary):",F }
2 u'
❑ Yes LN No
❑ Yes W No
❑ Yes ,"y No
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name E ,F
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
T u Y.
Date:

Animal Operations 7121198 `
Waste Plan
Facility
Certification #
Certified
Number Owner 1 Farm Name Address & Phone
Design Capacity
and Permit #
Operator in Charge Integrator
05 _ 1 Cline & Chris Greene 307 Pine Swamp Rd
Swine
Certified
Dwight C. Greene
................................................................................. Fleetwood NC 28626
300
E005040
Removal Comments
Cline & Chris Greene Farm 910-8774835
Feeder to Finish
ASSIGNED 7a `
DUE DATE.- 30_
•
1

e
❑DSWC Aal Feedlot
Operatlon Revlew
F
�� �
� DWQ�An><mal Feedlot
Operatlon�SltezInspechon
�R�
10 Routine ® Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number d Time of Inspection ; 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ® Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr .l5 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
f❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated : ............. ............................. ............... ...........................................................................................
FarmName:..ir.�(I�F..!4., RlS....../1.7:.R��1.�1.a................................................... County:.......CIs..........................................................
Land Owner Name:.. , I 4�.... .....A.I.;....... CAUNF ......................... Phone No:....���.......�. �.� � �..�.s�a�.........................
Facility Conctact:...C.i•,1llt.E...... aE5.cN...F.............................. Title:..... �.W. -VER....................... Phone No:....1..� .".' 7 ...........
Mailing Address:.,..a.C...7�..... ..I'VE..... �?kK..4X!l.P....... 1pst....._................................... ... ELfi ..T wP..4..Q................... !. ...... ..................
OnsiteRepresentative: ............................. ........ ........... ........ Integrator: ........................................ ................................... .........
j►.
Certified Operator: ....i.P.Als............................ .GALT.R..GALT.RE ...................................... Operator Certification Number: .... l9.,7..t.1............ .....
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®• 17 46 « Longitude ' l 2 LJ` �
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
FZK, k �� Design sk Current"� l f N: «Desig i �' 'Current£ Desigq " Cu rent
Swine �. ,• _ . Cattle m
w. ..,. 6i acl `WPo uiatian, paultr3'.: Ca aci = Po Mahon =g ' , .*Ca ati Pa' ulatioq
Z ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dai
Feeder to Finish 0 :V ❑ Non -La er � ; ❑Non-Dai
Farrow to Wean V
El Farrow to Feeder Total DesignCapaeity� M
10 Farrow to Finish
�., T�ta1=SSi;W 000
„❑
r Other � �� < •� � �'
,:...............s:
s
q
fr ` / aldingtPands ❑Subsurface Drams Present
Number of Lagoons H
k oon rea ray Fie[ , .� �. ❑Lag ❑ Sp d Area A
energl
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes Z No
[:]Yes 9 No
❑ Yes
53 No
❑ Yes
® No
k /p
❑ Yes
ONO
❑ Yes
Ca No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
Continued on back

acilF ity Number:.. r...—...5.�..
6. Is facility not in compliance with any ap ble setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
1@ Yes ❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structutgs (Lagoons andlor Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
1)�_
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Waste Appligaligil
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of�WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWDQ))
15. Crop type ...LT...`.!!` f ... ! .}...�i ...r..,L�: -G rv..�....d"�'..�'t��'...........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
EQr Cgrtified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Ulan readily available?
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes W No
❑ Yes 5Q No
C9 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes t@ No
® Yes ❑ o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes I"No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question'#) � 1~acplain any YES.:answers`and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use diawmgs of facility to better expiam situations (use additional pages as necessary) f
Al
6)
All,
�, �t�) a,r•�- c•--�- 1YP3 �i�- c..�•� e • i ti'z3' `�-«�.-r.A.,�. , 4
17,
J
Reviewer/Inspector Name '' p" ._
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: L 2
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

SWG'Aiumal��F,0d16t Ope
r. L1 ".rr %L-cluilUAlLrA
routine O Complaint O Follow-u2 of DWQ inspection' O Follow-up of DSWC•review O Other
Date of Inspection /Y 9
Facility Number Time of inspection / o A� Use �h>°tim 05
Farm Status:�•-� YeC., Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview E —�
V '� or Inspection ('includes travel and processing) -= `J
NL e_ NL _r5 6Y'eelyCounty:
y
Farm Name: C �-�1.�...._.,.••,r. ...�.......,
Owner Name: C _C,�! S �L��t° �,� Phone No.:. S7 7 _�4?-3 5__._
Mailing Address:* 3 77--- C1-e= s_el'1�C:V . ,.=.L�.... woo C! � ! `� C .. ��a 2"�
Onsite Representative: IN e- VL -� Y1 S r /�� Integrator: -
Certified Operator: -C �_►r_t �•, „ Ne — _ _ .. Operator Certification Number: _. I! I 3
Location of Farm:
Latitude 3(, • /©` ®" Longitude ®• �� �"
In Not Operational Date Last Operated:........... q -7
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
kcp'>y,yw�"�'.. x-?ir'�'xit-o^.+. ✓'r> .:?::"^%ii�?.t:� "':5,-".`sF">..+U�W,s.a n' sA�;•tY'r i;
; Swine tr M Number £ F 's Poultry Nuniber� a Cattle , Nuinlier
..
❑ Wean to Feeder ; ❑Laver ❑ DairyKt.
❑ Feeder to Finish 300 ❑Non Laver El
t "
4" Farrow to Wean.�.��`�+"��� " �„� ,�� "��^ �,��.��,: �� .� �. , •a,
g Farrow to Feeder x....,
Farrow to Finish ❑Other Tyne of Lrvestocic r.`' < V
A izmberoCLagaons_jaldingrPands� []Subsurface Drains Present p "
❑Lagoon Area gpo Spray Fieid�Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes M' O
2. Is any' discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes lld NO
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the. operation? ❑ Yes [-110
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? _ ❑ Yes ago-
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes P io
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any aable setback criteria? .. 1..:
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified 31,11„or in responsible charge (if inspection after7)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? -
Structures (Laeoons and/or Holdinff Pondsl"
9. Is structttral freeboard less thatr adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon.l . Lagoon 2 Lagoon•3•--
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(Irony of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste A lication.'
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
IS. Crop type t'Gi 5 7v Ce
16. Do the active crops differ with those des
ri
in the Animal Waste Management Plan? : _;-
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
..t
4
❑ Yes
aj
❑ Yes
440 .
.
..� :...
_ .-❑ Yes
"❑ No ....
Lagoon 4
.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
�o
❑ Yes M,-10
❑ Yes M,% o
❑ Yes, M-Ko�,
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes UINO
For Certified Facilities Oniv
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?. ❑ Yes: ❑ No
21. Does the.facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way? - ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? _.� ❑ Yes ❑ No
�3. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
_4. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss-review/Ins*ction with owner or operator in charge. ❑ Yes ❑ No
Conimcats (refer,to';guest�on #)- £zplam any YES answers and/ oCanyrecommendationioL SnyCtllet^CQrt1IIICntS'�� o-
:. �..
;LTsc. drawings ofRf'acility;to bete r exglaizrsituations wise addauonal pages as sscccssary�� ;
�... . _
4
RevieweriInspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
- Date: 0 4///i;/ /,/,
cc: Division of Water Quality, Watgi Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/ 14/96

10 Routine p Complaint. p Follow-up of DWU inspection p o ow -up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total'171melln fractiono ours
Farm Status: Registered (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
Farm Name: Cline:.&.Chxis..Greenxe.F.arw..................................................... I ....... I.,.... County: Ashe WSRO
Owner Name: Cline.,&..Cltrk..................... Grxcae ........................................................ Phone No: 910:47..?-482A5....
Mailing Address: 3A7.Pane.Swaxup.Ad.......................................................................... Elatwoxid..NC ..................................................... 28626 .............
Onsite Representative: ClInt.aad.Clixis.Greene........................................................Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator; D.wight.C.............................. Gicracat .............................................. Operator Certification Number. 1929.3.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®+©° ®K Longitude ®• ©° ®64
in Not OperationalDate Last Operated: ...............................................................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
p Yes N No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No

6.
Is facility in compliance with any apple setback criteria?
Yes
No
not
p
N
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)?
p Yes
N No
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (Lggoons and/or Holding_Ponds) '
9.
Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
© Yes
p No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
Lagoon 4
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
p No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
p No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
p No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
p Yes
p No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
17 Yes
N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ........................ Sudex..cudw................... ...............................................................................
16.
Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
p Yes
N No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
N No
18.
Does the cover crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19.
Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
p Yes
®No
For Certified Facilities Only_
20.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
21.
Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
p Yes
p No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes p No
24, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? p'Yes p No
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Animal Operations CSA,&-o 515198
Waste Plan
Facility Certification # Certified
Number Owner I Farm Name Address & Phone Design Capacity and Permit # Operator in Charge Integrator
05 _ 1 Cline & Chris Greene 307 Pine Swamp Rd Swine Certified Dwight C. Greene
Fleetwood NC 28626
300 F005Q40 Removal Comments
Cline & Chris Greene Farm Feeder to Finish
910-877-4835 '
E -1
•
I

05 1 Ashe
Facility Number County
0 5-1 Ashe
0 5-2 Ashe
Oneratio
Greene Cline Deep Gap NC Location: Take Hwy. 221 to
Idlawild Road. Turn onto Idlewild
Road. Go. 2.5 miles to Pine
Swamp Road. Turn right onto Pine
Swamp Road. Farm is located at
the first house on Pine Swamp
Road
Greene Cline Deep Gap NC Faun lam: Take Hwy. 221 to
Idlewiid Road. Turn onto idlewild
Rd. Go 2.5 miles to Pure Swamp
Road. Turn right onto Pine Swamp
Road. Farm Is located at the first
house on Pine Swamp Road.
Phone Desion Operation
capacity Tvpe
877-4835 500 Swine
877-4835 500 Swine
•
•

OPERATIONS BRANCH - W0 Fax:[phone]«
PROM
Jul 0 9:45 P•07/15
94v?"2ee2 i9'96+07•47 05,S t9 M7 10.02iw2
County: �...�
Agos,t; visiting Sao:
Opmtor
On site Reflrex,u►ta[3vo:
Physical Address:
Meiling Addmis:
SITE VIStTA' 'ION RECORD
DATS. / ,1995
�ftrm Name:
nacllity Namber: d
iFflim: 17 C?- z4 G -- -
Phorm. Z--7 —
_ Phone
Type of Cfixmdan: SwIne Poultry Cattle
Design CgA01f)r. Number of Animals cm Site:
I -Ad le: JL, 60 -1 '7 —0-L' Lomgitudo: iLkl _,.' 0 "
Typo of Ynspocfion: around � Aerial
Circle Yc* or lqn
Does the MittSal WAm l lgcen have is t ter rard of 1 Faot + 25 yw 24 hour storm evens f
(Ap�ximaiely 1 Foot + 71ncher Yes r �Io Aclua1 Froebostl: —L Pee; --iL w,.4e;
Tor faailiti's wish MOM than ore R s on, plume address the uthor legoom' fmcbwd under the
cnlzuklents melon.
Was Any Ncopogo observed frtmt, the Ingoon(s)? Y do as tlicrc erosion oftho daml;=Yas 06
is adapaw land avallable rot le,id applic: on Ycs : 0 Is the cover crap sdagnate Yt:3 ! No
Ad itiunal C.ommentn: '
U .-.�
FEZ to (9 i 9) 715-3539
,.�_ _ - . -� , — j.ti- + , .,� r 4.4-06�
/ Si6nitum 114
Agent
by
10'd l'T'06L6, '0;` 4`rii 111Sr� 2� [ a]m q6-7i-Inr