760060_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NC Department of
Environmental Quality
., Received ROY COOPER
Governor
T 0EC 0 f 2017 l , MICHAEL S. REGAN
~a¢ Secretary
Winston-Salem LINDA CULPEPPER
Water mental Quality
Regional Office Interim Director
Environmental Quality - ..
November 29, 2017
Ard Koopman
Koopman Dairies, Inc
204 Loyd Road
Statesville, NC 28625
RE: Acknowledgment of Receipt of Payment
Case No.: DV-2017-0035
Farm No.: 76-0060
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Koopman:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 35281 in the amount of $6407.52
on November 29, 2017. This payment satisfies in full the civil assessment in the amount of
$6407.52 levied against Koopman Dairies, Inc. and the case has been closed. If you have any
questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Program
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: WQROS- Winston-Salem Regional Office
File # DV-2017-0035
WQROS Central Files (AWS760060)
< .-'Nolhing Compares'=-,,.
Stale of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919.707.9129

NC Department of
Environmental Quality
Received
ROY COOPER
Governor
NOV 1 d 2017
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
Water Resources
Winston-Salem ..
LINDA CULPEPPER
Environmental Quality
Regional Office :;,
Interim Director
November 14, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL - #7016 2140 0000 0564 3760
RETURNRECEIPT REQUESTED
Ard Koopman
Koopman Dairies, Inc
204 Loyd Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Case No. DV-2017-0035
Farm # 76-0060
Permit Number AWC760060
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Koopman:
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), the Director of the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources considered the information you submitted in support of your
request for remission and did not find grounds to modify the civil penalty assessment of$6,407.52.
A copy of the Director's decision is attached.
Two options are available to you at this stage of the remission process:
1) You may pay the penalty.
t.
If you decide to pay the penalty please make your check payable to the Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ). Send the payment within thirty (30) calendar days of your
receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Miressa D. Garoma
NC DEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
OR
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

r,
Remission
Ard Koopman
Enforcement # DV-2017-0035
Page 2 of 2
i J,
2) You may decide to have the. Environmental Management Commission's (EMC)
" . . 4
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions, make the final decision on your remission
request.
If payment is not received within 30 calendar days from your receipt of this letter, your request
for remission with supporting documents and the recommendation of the Director of the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources will be delivered to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions for final agency decision.
If ;you or your representative would like to speak before the Committee, you must complete
and return the attached Request for Oral Presentation Form within thirty (30) calendar days of
receipt of this letter. Send the completed form to:
Miressa D. Garoma
NC DEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
The EMC Chairman will review the supporting documents and your request for an oral
presentation (if you make the request). If the Chairman determines that there is a compelling
reason to require a presentation, you will be notified of when and where you should appear. If
a presentation is not required, the final decision will be based upon the written record.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Debra J. Watts, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operations and
Ground Water Protection Branch
Attachments
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office WQROS
File # DV-2017-0035
WQROS Central Files (AWC760060)

0 . Z
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
CIVIL PENALTY RENIISSION FACTORS
Case Number: DV-2017-0035 Region: Winston-Salem County: Randolph
Assessed Entity: Koopman Dairies, Inc. Permit: AWC760060
® (a) Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner:
Of the eight assessment factors described in the Civil Penalty Assessment, the petitioner does not specifically state
in their August 16 2017 remission request which factor they believe was wrongly applied. However, their
remission request states that the manure was incorporated into the soil on the first day in which the field was dry
enough and that the field was added to the waste.plan in a timely manner. These responses will be addressed in
"b" below. Their letter also states that the alleged discharge was an accident so this will be addressed in "c" below.
® (b) Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation:
Submitted records indicate that animal waste was applied March 25, 29, 30 and April 3, 2017. The region believes
that potential environmental damage could have been avoided if the permittee had tilled -in the waste prior to the
April 3, 2017 0.50-inch rain event. Since most of the waste run-off occurred prior to tilling -in on April 8, 2017,
there was little environmental damage that could have been abated. The region agrees with the petitioner in that
after the rain event, field conditions were not suitable for tilling until April 8, 2017
The region also notes that the violator promptly contacted their technical specialist to request that the unpermitted
receiving fields be added to their waste plan.
® (c) Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident:
Previously submitted records indicate that the application area had a 65% chance of receiving 0.29 inches of rain
on the day that waste was applied to the unpermitted fields. The permittee's records indicate that the area
ultimately received 0.50 inches of rain. While the WSRO does not believe that the permittee intended for waste
to run-off into surface waters, we also conclude that the forecast predictions were too great to have even considered
applying waste that day and that the run-off of waste into surface waters could have been avoided. Additionally,
the pennittee is responsible for knowing which fields are in the waste plan. Thus, we do not believe the violations
to be inadverdant or an accident.
❑ (d) Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations:
® (e) Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions:
The petitioner did not state in their August 16, 2017 remission request that the civil penalty will prevent them
from paying for remedial actions. However, the region notes that remedial actions, include tilling, have already
been completed. Other actions, include the addition of the unpermitted receiving fields to the waste plan, have
already been initiated through the local technical specialist for which there is no fee.
DECISION (Check On )
Request Denied
Full Remission ❑ Retain Enforcement Costs? Yes ❑No ❑
Partial Remission [] $ _ (Enter Amount Remitted)
L' da tulpepper Date ---
k, I
rev 1.0 — 6..31.04

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST:
KOOPMAN DAIRIES, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DWR Case Number: DV-2017-0035
REQUEST FOR ORAL PRESENTATION
I hereby request to make an oral presentation before the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions in the matter of the case noted above. In making this request, I assert that I understand all of the following statements:
• This request will be reviewed by the Chairman of the Environmental Management Commission and may be either granted or denied.
• Making a presentation will require the presence of myself and/or my representative during a Committee mceting held in Raleigh,
North Carolina.
• My presentation will be limited to discussion of issues and information submitted in my original remission request, and because no
factual issues are in dispute, my presentation will be limited to five (5) minutes in length.
The North Carolina State Bar's Authorized Practice of Law Committee has ruled that the appearance in a representative capacity at
quasi-judicial hearings or proceedings is limited to lawyers who are active members of the bar. Proceedings before the Committee on
Remissions are quasi-judicial. You should consider how you intend to present your case to the Committee in light of the State Bar's
opinion and whether anyone will be speaking in a representative capacity for you or a business or governmental entity. If you or your
representative would like to speak before the Committee, you must complete and return this form within thirty (30) days of receipt of
this letter.
Depending on your status as an individual, corporation, partnership.or municipality, the State Bar's Opinion affects how you may
proceed with your oral presentation. See www.ncbar.com/ethics, Authorized Practice Advisory Opinion 2006-1 and 2007 Formal
Ethics Opinion 3.
• If you are an individual or business owner and are granted an opportunity to make an oral presentation before the Committee,
then you do not need legal representation before the Committee; however, if you intend on having another individual speak
on your behalf regarding the factual situations, such as an expert, engineer or consultant, then you must also be present at the
meeting in order to avoid violating the State Bar's Opinion on the unauthorized practice of law.
If you are a corporation, partnership or municipality and are granted an opportunity to make an oral presentation before the
Committee, then your representative must consider the recent State Bar's Opinion and could be considered practicing law without a
license if he or she is not a licensed attorney. Presentation of facts by non -lawyers is permissible.
If you choose to request an oral presentation, please make sure that signatures on the previously submitted Remission Request form
and this Oral Presentation Request form are: 1) for individuals and business owners, your own signature and 2) for corporations,
partnerships and municipalities, signed by individuals who would not violate the State Bar's Opinion on the unauthorized practice of
law.
Also, be advised that the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may choose not to proceed with hearing your case if the
Committee is informed that a violation of the State Bar occurs.
This the day of , 20
SIGNATURE
TITLE (President, Owner, etc.)
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE (

Water Resources w
Environmental Quality
Ard Koopman
Koopman Dairies, Inc
204 Loyd Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear Mr. Koopman:
NC Department of = 7
Environmental Quality � Received ROY COOPER
Governor
AUG 2 3 2017 `' : � MICHAEL S. REGAN
11 Secretary
Winston-Salem ` S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
±` Regional Office Director
August 22, 2017
SUBJECT: Remission Request
Farm # 76-0060
Randolph County
File No. DV-2017-0035
Permit No. AWC760060
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request, on August 21, 2017, for remission of the
civil penalty levied against the subject facility. The Director of the Division of Water Resources
will review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your remission request.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone]:
Sincerely,
ire sa D. Gafoma
Animal Feeding Operations Program
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: Winston-Salem WQROS Regional Supervisor
File # DV-2017-0035
WQROS Central Files (AWC760060)
--7:7�'"'Nothing Compares' --,-
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional operations Section
1636 Mail Service center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

i, . �i
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
NC Department of
Environmental Quality
Received
JUL 3 1 2017
Winston-Salem
Regional office
July 27, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL - 47016 2140 0000 0564 3 64 7
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ard Koopman
Koopman Dairies, Inc
204 Loyd Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear Mr. Koopman:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of
15A NCAC 2T .0105(e)(2)
Farm # 76-0060
Randolph County
Enforcement File No. DV-2017-0035
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Koopman Dairies, Inc. in the amount of
$5,000.00, and $1,407.52 in investigative costs, for a total of $6,407.52. Attached is a copy of the
assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement
action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environmental Quality (do not
include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for any
continuing or new violation(s). Please submit payment to the attention of,
Miressa Garoma
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
OR
-!- A Nothing Compares!:-�
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center J Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

Assessment of civil penalty
Koopman Dairies, Inc
Enforcement # DV-2017-0035
Page 2 of 3
2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five factors listed below, as
they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission is
not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the
factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your
right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation and agreement that no factual or legal issues are in
dispute. Please prepare a detailed statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be
remitted, and submit it to the Division of Water Resources at the address listed below. In determining
whetheT a remission request will be approved, the following factors shall be considered:
(1) whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in _NCGS 143B-282. l (b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the violator; '
(2) whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(3) whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(4) whether the violator has been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; or
(5) whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions.
Please note that all evidence presented in support of your request for remission must be submitted in
writing. The Director of the Division of Water Resources will review your evidence and inform you
of their decision in the matter of your remission request. The response will provide details regarding
the case status, directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions (Committee).
Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original
remission request considered by the Director. 'Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a
complete and thorough statement in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed "Request for Remission of Civil
Penalties, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation of Facts" form within thirty (30)
days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Resources also requests that you complete and submit
the enclosed "Justification for Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following
address:
Miressa Garoma
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
OR
3. File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you must file a petition for an
administrative hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the Office of Administrative Hearings.

Assessment of civil penalty
Koopman Dairies, Inc
Enforcement # DV-2017-0035
Page 3 of 3
You must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of
this notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in .the Office of Administrative Hearings
during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The petition may be filed
by facsimile (fax) or electronic mail by an attached file (with restrictions) - provided the signed original,
one (1) copy and a filing fee (if a filing fee is required by NCGS § 15013-23.2) is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings within seven (7) business days following the faxed or electronic transmission.
You should contact the Office of Administrative Hearings with all questions regarding the filing fee and/or
the details of the filing process. The mailing address and telephone and fax numbers for the Office of
Administrative Hearings are as follows:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
William F. Lane, General Counsel
DEQ
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice, as evidenced
by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter being referred to the
Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil action.
Included in this enforcement package is the requirement to apply for coverage under an NPDES
permit. According to the North Carolina General Statutes §143-215.1, 40 Code of Federal
Regulations §122.23, and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency once a facility has a discharge to waters of the State, the permittee
must apply for an NPDES permit (see the attached letter for instructions).
Please be advised that additional penalties.may be assessed for violations that occur after the review period
of this assessment. If you have any questions, please contact Miressa D. Garoma at [phone].
Sincerely,
on ' aard, Chief
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Winston-Salem WQROS Regional Supervisor wl attachments
Nile # DV-2017-0035 wl attachments
WQROS Central Files wl attachments
Randolph County Health Department

J�
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
IN THE MATTER OF
KOOPMAN DAIRIES, INC.
FOR VIOLATIONS OF CATTLE )
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM }
GENERAL PERMIT AWG200000 }
AND NORTH CAROLINA }
GENERAL STATUE 143-215.1OC )
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT QUALITY
DV-2017-0035
FINDING AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality and
the Director of the Division of Water Resources (DWR), I, Jon Risgaard, Chief of the Water Quality
Regional Operations Section of the DWR, make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Koopman Dairies, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State
of North Carolina.
B. Koopman Dairies, Inc. owns and operates a permitted dairy cattle operation located on
Meredell Farm Road in Randolph County.
C. Koopman Dairies, Inc. was issued Certificate of Coverage AWC760060 under Cattle
Waste Management System General Permit AWG200000 for Koopman Dairies, Inc. on
May 27, 2016, effective upon issuance, with an expiration date of September 30, 2019.
D. G.S. 143-215.1(a) states that "No person shall do the following things or carry out any of
the following activities unless that person has received a permit from the Commission
and has complied with all conditions set forth in the permit: make any outlets into the
waters of the State."
E. Condition 1.1. of General Permit AWG200000 states in part that "Any discharge of waste
that reaches surface waters or wetlands is prohibited except as otherwise provided in this
General Permit and associated statutory and regulatory provisions. Waste shall not reach
surface waters or wetlands by runoff, drift, manmade conveyance, direct application,
direct discharge or through ditches, terraces, or grassed waterways not otherwise
classified as State waters."
F. On April 6, 2017 staff from the Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regional
Office (WSRO) investigated a complaint alleging that Koopman Dairies, Inc. applied
animal waste in such a manner as to cause the runoff of waste into Sandy Creek, a WS-III
water within the Cape Fear River Basin. On April 6, 2017 DWR-WSRO staff observed
an illegal discharge of animal waste from a 55-acre tract of land, owned by Koopman
Dairies, Inc., located off Old Red Cross Road in Randolph County (parcel identification
number 8707191668). The discharge was not discovered or reported to the WSRO by
Koopman Dairies, Inc.

w
G. Condition No. 1I.2. General Permit AWG200000 states in part that "No waste shall be
applied upon areas not included in the CAWMP or upon areas `where the crop is
insufficient for nutrient utilization. However, if the CAWMP allows, then waste may be
applied up to thirty (30) days prior to planting or breaking dormancy."
H. Records submitted by the permittee document that animal waste was applied onto bare
ground owned by Koopman Dairies, Inc. on March 25, 29, 30 and April 3, 2017. At the
time of our investigation, the receiving tract was not listed in the CAWMP and a crop had
not yet been planted to utilize the nutrients. The permittee's 10-day response letter
indicates that the field was planted sometime between April 8 and May 9, 2017,
I. Condition II.7. of the General Permit AWG200000 states that "If manure or sludges are
applied on conventionally tilled bare soil, the waste shall be incorporated into the soil
within two (2) days after application on the land, or prior to the next rainfall event,
whichever occurs first. This requirement does not apply to no -till fields, pastures, or
fields where crops are actively growing."
On the date of the complaint investigation, DWR staff noted that waste had been
applied to the receiving tract on March 25, 29, 30 and April 3, 2017 and that the waste
had not been incorporated within two days or prior to the April 3, 2017 rain event. The
permittee's response letter notes that a disk was used to incorporate the manure on April
8, 2017.
K. Condition No. II.22. General Permit AWG200000 states in part that "Land application of
waste is prohibited during precipitation events. The Permittee shall consider pending
weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste and shall document the
weather conditions at the time of land application on forms supplied by or approved by
the Division.
Land application of waste shall cease within four (4) hours of the time that the National
Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning, or a Flood Watch
associated with a tropical system including a hurricane, tropical storm, or tropical
depression for the county in which the permitted facility is located."
L. Application records document that on April 3, 2017 Koopman Dairies, Inc. applied
59,200 gallons of animal waste (4.77 lbs. plant available nitrogen per acre) onto 55 acres
of a denuded and unpennitted tract of land. The National Weather Service (NWS)
forecast for April 3, 2017 was for rain and thunderstorms in and around the application
area. Records submitted by Koopman Dairies, Inc. indicate that there was a 65% chance
for 0.29 inches of precipitation near the application field on April 3, 2017. The
permittee's records also document that "a little less than 0.50 inches" of rain fell on or
near the application field on April 3, 2017 and that a total of "less than 0.75 inches of
rain occurred on the three days following the April 3, 2017 application event.
M. Koopman Dairies, Inc. had no valid permit for the above described activities.
N. On April 21, 2017, DWR issued a Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Enforce
(NOV/NOI) to Ard Koopman of Koopman Dairies, Inc. for: 1) applying animal waste to
fields not in the CAWMP; 2) failing to incorporate manure into bare soil within two days
or prior to the next rainfall event; and 3) the unpermitted discharge of animal waste into
waters of the State.

4t.
O. - The NOV/NOI was sent Certified mail and received by Monique Koopman on May 2,
2017, The DWR-WSRO received a response from the violator on May 12, 2017.
P. The cost to the State for the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled S 1,407.52.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Koopman Dairies, Inc. is a "person' within the meaning of N.C.G.S.§ 143-215.6A
pursuant to N.C.G.S.§ 143-212(4).
B. The unnamed tributary to Sandy Creek constitutes waters of the State within the meaning
of N.C.G.S. § 143-215.1 pursuant to N.C.G.S.§ 143-212(6)...
C. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by N.C.G.S.§ 143-215.1.
D. The above -cited discharge constitutes making an outlet to the waters of the State for
purposes of N.C.G.S.§143-215.1(a)(1), for which a permit is required by N.C.G.S.§143-
215.1. The discharge also violated Condition I.1. of General Permit AWG200000.
E. Koopman Dairies, Inc. violated Condition 1I.2. of General Permit AWG200000 by
applying waste onto areas not included in the CAWMP or upon areas where the crop was
insufficient for nutrient utilization.
F. The above -cited failure to incorporate manure into bare soil within two days after land
application, or prior to the next rainfall event, is a violation of permit condition No. II.7
of General Permit AWG200000.
G. The above -cited failure to consider pending weather conditions in making the decision to
apply waste is a violation of permit condition No. 11.22. of General Permit AWG200000.
H. Koopman Dairies, Inc may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G. S.
143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more that twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who is
required but fails to act in accordance with terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit
required by G. S. 143-215.1.
I. N.C.G.S.§143-215.6A(b) provides that if any failure to act as required by the rules is
continuous, a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per violation may be assessed for
each day the violation continues.
J. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Koopman Dairies,
Inc. pursuant to G. S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G. S. 14313-282.1(b)(8).
K. The Chief of the Water Quality Regional Operations Section, Division of Water
Resources, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environmental Quality and the Director of the Division of Water Resources, has the
authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Koopman Dairies, Inc. is hereby assessed a civil penalty of.
000
For making an outlet to the waters of the State without a permit as
required by G.S. 143-215. L, and in violation of Condition I.1 of General
Permit AWG200000.
$ t 0o O L`
For violating Condition I1.2. of General Permit AWG200000 by applying
animal waste onto areas not included in the CAWMP.
For violating Condition II.7 of General Permit AWG200000 by failing to
incorporate manure into bare soil within two days after land application
or prior to the next rainfall event.
G4
For violation of permit condition II.22. of General Permit AWG200000
by failing to consider pending weather conditions in making the decision
to apply waste.
0
$ SOyc)
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY which is percent of the maximum
penalty authorized by N.C.G.S. § 143-215.6A.
$ 1407.52
Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to N.C.G.S.§ 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken into account
the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at N.C.G.S.§ 143B-282. I (b), which
are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
IV. NOTICE:
I reserve the right to assess civil penalties and investigative costs for any continuing violations
occurring after the assessment period indicated above. Each day of a continuing violation may be
considered a separate violation subject to a maximum $25,000.00 per day penalty. Civil penalties
and investigative cost may be assessed for any other rules and statutes for which penalties have
not yet been assessed.

V. TRANSMITTAL:
These Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision shall be transmitted to Koopman
Dairies, Inc. in accordance with N.C.G.S.§ 143-215.6(A)(d).
r
07-���
(Date) Risg ,Chief
Water Wiality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
KOOPMAN DAIRIES, INC. )
PERMIT NO. AWC760060 ) FILE NO. DV-2017-0035
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling 56,407.52 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Resources dated, July 27, 2017, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment
document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission
of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Resources within
thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the day of , 2017
Signature
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REOUEST
APS Case Number: DV-2017-0035 County: Randolph
Assessed Party: K000man Dairies, Inc.
Permit No.: AWC760060 Amount assessed: $6,407.52
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
"Request For Remission, Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts "
form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe
support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in determining your request for
remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty
assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s)
occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment
document. By law [NCGS 133-215.6A(f)] remission of a civil penalty may be granted when one
or more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to
your case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why
the factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in NCGS 143B-282.1(bl were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are
included in the attached penalty matrix and/or listed in the civil penalty assessment
document);
(b) the violator_ promptly_ abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent
future occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil_ penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you
from performing the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:
\Rem. req.

DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Violator: Koopman Dairies, Inc.
County., Randolph
Case Number: DV-2017-0035
Permit Number: AWC760060
ASSESSMENT FACTORS
1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation;
While no fish kills were reported, there was the potential for impact to the Town ofRamseur's water
supply, located 17 miles downstream, since the impacted portion of the stream is classified as a WS-IIL A
total of 59,200 gallons of animal waste was applied to the receiving field on April 3, 2017.
High levels offecal coliform (see #3, below) is a public concern and could have put anyone in contact
with the water at riskfor contamination. The unpermitted discharge of waste into Sandy Creek certainly
impacted private land since the receiving stream flows directly onto a neighboring property not owned by
Mr. Koopman or Koopman Dairies Inc.
2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
Documents show that Koopman Dairies Inc applied waste onto land not listed in the CAWMP on April 3,
2017 and that the application area received a little less than 0.5 inches of rain that day. The area also
received some additional rain after the date of application. Since a discharge of waste from the receiving
field was still actively occurring on April 6, 2017, it is possible that the unpermitted discharge of waste
could have been occurring for three days.
3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
Samples taken by WSRO staff of the waste leaving the application field indicate that very high levels of
fecal coliform (560,000 co11100mL), nutrients, and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD=1,300) were
illegally discharged into Sandy Creek Samples of the waste source obtained by the permittee also
indicate high levels of BOD (12, 000) and fecal coliform (2, 4000, 000 MPN1100 mL).
In the opinion of the WSRO, the animal waste odor emanating from the 55-acne application field was
much stronger than is typical, possibly due to such a large application area with no receiving crop as
well as no/few trees to help buffer the smell. Since the receiving stream level was unusually high due to
recent rains, there was no expected impact on the quantity of water due to the unpermitted discharge.
4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
At this point, there is no way to rectify the stream damage caused by the discharge of animal waste. The
manure was incorporated into the soil approximately five days after application. There would, therefore,
be an unknown labor and fuel cost associated with soil incorporation. There is no cost associated with
the unpermitted fields being added to the CAWMP since a Randolph County NRCS technical specialist is
now working on this.
5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
There does not appear to be any actual money saved by applying waste to a nonpermitted field, not
incorporating the waste, and by applying the waste when some rain was forecast. However, there could
be a substantial amount of time saved by not waiting for the f elds to be added to the waste plan, and the
timing of the applications due to weather and workload limitations. This could equate to money -saved by
Koopman Dairies Inc.
6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
Records submitted by Koopman Dairies Inc indicate that there was a 65% chance for 0.29 inches of
precipitation near the application field on April 3, 2017. The permittee's records also document that "a
rev 1.0 - 8.31.09

little less than 0.50 inches" of rain fell on or near the application field on April 3, 2017. The regional
office does not believe the discharge violation to have been committed wildly or intentionally, but
rather; the result of negligence and poor judgement.
The YYSRO believes that Koopman Dairies Inc. willfully and intentionally chose to violate their permit by
applying waste not listed in the waste plan and by not incorporating the waste immediately. Mr.
Koopman owns and manages other dairies in both the WSRO and Moorsesville Regional Office and thus,
should be aware of these permit conditions.
fer--Ac. %-c.as.n1JurWe-•.��cJtb�.. AW �`.��c}1 4ac i� W/kl'. lcr-j&e ,) rellk-l"Ue �or
ll
7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
There is no record of previbus' violalions by Koopman Dairies Inc. under A WC760060 after
receiving permit as a new owner on February 10, 2012.
8} The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
$1,407.52
Date Jon gaard
rev 1.0 - 8.31.09

w
Environmental
Quality
June 27, 2017
Ard Koopman
Koopman Dairies, Inc.
204 Loyd Road
Statesville, NC 28625
ROY COOPER
Governor
MIC14AEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Permit Requirement
Facility Number: AWC760060
Dear Mr. Koopman:
According to our.records, your facility was assessed for a discharge of wastewater to the waters
of the state that occurred on April 6, 2017. As a result, according to the North Carolina General
Statutes § 143-215.1, 40 Code of Federal Regulations § 122.23, and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, you are
required to apply for coverage under an NPDES permit. .
Within 90 days of receipt of this letter, complete and return the attached form, "NPDES
General Permit Application— Existing Animal Waste Operations." Please carefully follow
the instructions on the form. If you wish to apply for an Individual NPDES Permit instead of a
General Permit, please contact us and we will forward you that application. Two copies of your
complete Certified Animal Waste Management Plan are required with the permit
application. Please refer to the checklist on page two of the application to be sure that all
necessary documents are submitted with the application.
A copy of the NPDES General Permit may be downloaded at our website:
htW: //deg.nc. gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality_regional-operations/afo
If it is your opinion that your facility should not be required coverage under an NPDES permit,
please provide written justification (such as change in ownership and management) so that the
Division can make appropriate determination to your, situation.
Continued...
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

Failure to submit the documentation as required may subject your facility to a civil penalty and
other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date.
If you have any questions about the NPDES permit or the enclosed application, please feel free
to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
r
/onRikd, Chief
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
CC: Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Randolph County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File (AWC760060)

DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
CIVIL PENALTY REMISSION FACTORS
Case Number: DV-2017-0035 Region: Winston-Salem County: Randolph
Assessed Entity: Koopman Dairies, Inc. Permit: AWC760060
® (a) Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner:
Of the eight assessment factors described in the Civil Penalty Assessment, the petitioner does not specifically state
in their August 16, 2017 remission request which factor they believe was wrongly applied. However, their
remission request states that the manure was incorporated into the soil on the first day in which the field was dry
enough and that the field was added to the waste plan in a timely manner. These responses will be addressed in
"b" below. Their letter also states that the alleged discharge was an accident so this will be addressed in "c" below.
® (b) Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation:
Submitted records indicate that animal waste was applied March 25, 29, 30 and April 3, 2017. The region believes
that potential environmental damage could have been avoided if the permittee had tilled -in the waste prior to the
April 3, 2017 0.50-inch rain event. Since most of the waste run-off occurred prior to tilling -in on April 8, 2017,
there was little environmental damage that could have been abated. The region agrees with the petitioner in that
after the rain event, field conditions were not suitable for tilling until April 8, 2017
The region also notes that the violator promptly contacted their technical specialist to request that the unpermitted
receiving fields be added to their waste plan.
® (c) Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident:
Previously submitted records indicate that the application area had a 65% chance of receiving 0.29 inches of rain
on the day that waste was applied to the unpermitted fields. The permittee's records indicate that the area
ultimately received 0.50 inches of rain. While the WSRO does not believe that the permittee intended for waste
to run-off into surface waters, we also conclude that the forecast predictions were too great to have even considered
applying waste that day and that the run-off of waste into surface waters could have been avoided. Additionally,
the permittee is responsible for knowing which fields are in the waste plan. Thus, we do not believe the violations
to be inadverdant or an accident.
❑ (d) Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations:
® (e) Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions:
The petitioner did not state in their August 16, 2017 remission request that the civil penalty will prevent them
from paying for remedial actions. However, the region notes that remedial actions, include tilling, have already
been completed. Other actions, include the addition of the unpermitted receiving fields to the waste plan, have
already been initiated through the local technical specialist for which there is no fee.
DECISION (Check One)
Request Denied ❑
Full Remission ❑ Retain Enforcement Costs? Yes ❑No ❑
Partial Remission ❑ $ (Enter Amount Remitted)
S. Jay Zimmerman Date
rev 1.0 — 9. 31.09

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
APS Case Number: DV-2017-0035 County: Randolph
Assessed Party: K000man Dairies, Inc.
Permit No.: AWC760060 Amount assessed. $6,407.52
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
' Re uest For Remission Waiver ofgijzht to an Administrative -H-saring, and Sh ulation o Facts "
farm to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that you believe
support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in determining your request for
remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the civil penalty
assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting whether the violation(s)
occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements contained in the civil penalty assessment
document. By law [NCGS 133-215.6A(f)] remission of a civil penalty may be granted when one
or more of the following five factors applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to
your case and provide a detailed explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why
the factor applies (attach additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty asse§ment factors _ice NCGS 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongLully igglied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are
included in the attached penalty matrix and/or listed in the civil penalty assessment
document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental datnage_resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent
future occurrences);
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare for);
(d) the violator had not been arse sed civilyenalties for any previous violations:
V (e) payment of the civil sty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you
from performing the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION:
\Rem. req.

DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
CIVIL PENALTY REMISSION FACTORS
Case Number: DV-2017-0035 Region: Winston-Salem County: Randolph
Assessed Entity: Koopman Dairies, Inc. Permit: AWC760060
® (a) Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner:
® (b) Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation:
® (c) Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident:
❑ (d) Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations:
® (e) Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions:
DECISION (Check One)
Request Denied ❑
Full Remission ❑ Retain Enforcement Costs? Yes ❑No ❑
Partial Remission ❑ $ (Enter Amount Remitted)
S. Jay Zimmerman Date
rev 1.0 - 8. 31.09

Statesville, August 16, 2017
Dear Mr. Risgaard,
tEGr„ .. a. � .� _ _ ."' %
I..ir i.� s`�'
A[ i `' 1 Zi i i
Water Quality
0oerauons 5l: lion
We request remission of the penalties assessed to us in APS case number: DV-2017-0035
for the following reasons:
A penalty of $3000 was assessed for making an outlet to the waters of the State. As you
can read in our response letter dated May 91' (copy attached) we applied manure on one
of our newly acquired and recently cleared fields which accidents created a minor,
alleged run off after we received more rain than forecasted. It was not our intention to
make any outlet to the waters of the State.
A penalty of $1000 was assessed for violating Condition 11.7. As we explained in our letters
to Mrs Rosenbrock and Mrs Knight we incorporated the manure on this field on 4/8. This
was the first day the field was dried up enough to enter.
A penalty of $1000 was assessed for vbla-ting-Condition II.g. We agree that we did not
Include this field in the CAWMP yet and apologize for that oversight. However this was
rectified in a timely manner so we don't really understand how paying a $1000 penalty
helps this situation.
As we stated before we sincerely apologize for what happened. We do our best to avoid
situations like this as our prior records show. However we are always looking for ways to
do even better. Right now we are experimenting with different methods to incorporate
manure in a more efficient way so we are less dependent on weather conditions. We are
also focused on extra training to our crew to make them even more aware of the
importance to protect our surface waters.
We respectfully ask you to not
Sincerely,
Monique Koopman
Ize us for the above mentioned,

Statesville May 9, 2017
Subject: NOI-2017-DV-0077
Dear Mrs Knight,
In response to your letter the following:
On April 3`d we applied manure to one of our newly acquired and recently cleared fields
which created an alleged run off. The weather forecast for that day was a 55% chance of
0.29 inches of rain for later in the afternoon. We included a screenshot of the forecast for
Liberty. We received more rain than forecasted, according to our records a little less than
0.5 inch. In your letter you refer to NWS records. Those records are either based on
weather in Asheboro or Siler City. This might be the difference in actual rainfall on our
location and NWS records as those cities are about 20 miles from our location. On the 3
days after the 31 we received less than 0.75 Inch according to our records for our
location. In a normal scenario this should not be enough rain to cause any run off. If there
was any minor runoff it was accidental and not our intention.
On 4/8, the first day the field was dried up enough, we used a disk to incorporate the
manure. As we could not enter the field prior to that date we do not believe we violated
permit condition 11.7.
We have submitted all information regarding the fields that were not in our plan yet to
Randy Blackwood, who will add them to our plan.
All fields have been planted in the last few weeks and a permanent vegetated buffer has
been created on the new and recently cleared field.
We have included a completed SLUR-1 form for tract 10730 and manure samples as
requested.
We were doing and will continue doing our best to be In compliance at all times,
Sincerely, Ard and Monique Koopman

0
Statesville April 11, 2017
Dear Mrs. Rosebrock,
in response to your visit on April 611 the following:
On or about April 3'd we received notice from an alleged run off from one of our fields. if
there was any run off we believe it was extremely minor in quantity. According to our
records we had less than 0.5 inch of rain on 4/3 and less 0.75 on the 3 days after. In a
normal scenario this should not be enough rain to cause any run off. If there was any
minor runoff it was accidental and not our intention.
To be on the safe side we used a disk in the field on 3/8, this was the first day that we
could enter the field after the rain ended.
All waste samples are being processed by the lab in Raleigh and as soon as results are in
we will forward them to you.
We apologize If we did have minor run off. We do our best to avoid situations like this as
our prior records show. We hope you take this into consideration,
Sincerely,
Koopman Dairies, Inc
By Monique Koopman

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
KOOPMAN DAIItIES, INC. )
}
PERMIT NO. AWC760060 } FILE NO. DV-2017-0035
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $6,407.52 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Resources dated, July 27, 2017, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment
document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission
of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Resources within
thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the notice of assessment,
This the day of pl� , 2017
Signature
RECEIVEDINCDEOJOR )dle vac AcnZ11,
AUG 2 1 2017
Water Quality Regional
Operations Section
TELEPHONE

I� i
Incident Report
Report Number : 201800070
nk of Water Resource
Incident Type :
Complaint
On -Site Contact
Category
APS - Animal
First/Mid/Last Name
Incident Started :
04/03/2017
Company Name
Country:
Randolph
Phone
City:
Liberty
Pager/Mobile Phone : 1
Farm # :
760060
Responsible Party :
Owner:
Koopman Dairies Inc
Reported By
Permit:
AWC760060
First/Mid/Last Name
Facility :
Koopman Dairies Inc
Company Name:
First Name:
Monique
Address
Middle Name:
Last Name:
Koopman
City/State/Zip
Address :
204 Lloyd Rd
Phone
Page/Mobile Phone: 1
City/State/Zip:
Statesville NC 28625
Phone:
Material Category:
Estimated Qty: UOM:
Chemical Name Reportable Qty.lbs. Reportable Qty.kgs.
DD:MM:SS Decimal
Position Method : Unknown
Latitude :
35° 53' 26" 35.890500
Position Accuracy: Nearest Second
Longtitude :
-790 40' 09"-79.669100
Position Datum : Unknown
Location of Incident
: Old Red Cross Road
Address :
CitylStatelZip :
Liberty
Report Created 1112118 3:53 pm Page: 1

Cause/Observation :
Observed animal waste flowing from application fields into Sandy
Creek (Water Supply III, Cape Fear River Basin). WSRO-DWR
sampled run-off waste, prior to its entry into creek. OwnerlOIC said
he was "trying to apply waste to stay ahead of the game" with regards
to the weather and the limited opportunities available to apply waste
and plant oom in the spring.
Action Taken :
Caller did not tell DWR about discharge until 4I512017.
Thunderstorms on 4/5/2017 so investigation took place 4/6/2017
Incident Questions :
Did the Material reach the surface Water? Yes
Surface Water Name ? Sandy Creek
Did the Spill result in a Fish Kill? Unknown
If the Spill was from a storage tank indicate type
Containment? Unknown
Cleanup Complete? Unknown
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft : Unknown
Event Type
Requested Additional Information
Report Entered
Incident closed
Report Received
Referred to Regional Office - Primary Contact
Incident Start
Directions :
Comments:
Very strong waste odor nearest Old Red Cross Road. Dead worms
observed in puddles of waste in field. Puddles very dark in color.
Tracks from equipment were noted in fields. Waste applied to small
grain on fields across road. Stream 10-15 feet wide. Stream water
much darker in color, with more discolored foam, downstream of the
denuded application fields. No discoloration noted in stream and
tributary upstream of recently cleared land that had received animal
waste, Observed sediment run-off from newly cleared land. Gullies
have also formed and are conveyance for sediment and waste.
Conveyance: Other
Estimated Number of fish?
(Above Ground or Under Ground)
Groundwater Impacted : Unknown
Event Date Due Date
2018/01/12 3:39A1
2017/ 11129 12:00:00
2017/04/05 8:00:00
2017/04/05 8:00:00
2017/04/03 7:00:00
Comment
Report Created 1112118 3:53 pm Page: 2

rs
i
Standard Agencies Notified
Agency Name Phone First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
Other Agencies Notified :
Agency Name Phone First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
DWQ Information
Report Taken By:
Melissa Rosebrock
Phone:
Date[Time: 2017/04/05 08:00:OOAM
Referred Via: Phone
Did DWQ request an additional written report?
If yes, What additional information is needed?
Report Entered By: Regional Contact:
Melissa Rosebrock Melissa Rosebrock
2018/01/12 03:39:41PM 2017/04/05 08:00:OOAM
Phone
Report Created 1/12118 3:53 pm Page: 3

FoRm SLUR-2
Tract
a FWd size(Wetted Acres) --(A)
4;
ratan Owner
Ownefs Address
Slurry and Sludge AppSicagon Field Records
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
10730 Flerd 4
55 Fatil.ty Number
Ard Kooprnen Spreader Q(y"w
204 L1ayd Rd., SfatesvllIs. NO 28825 and Address
Ownses Phone # L_- (704) 8784909
Operator's Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crp type Corn Moe Recommended PAR _ too
- --- _^ Lea (Ibleze) a (B) ._
M% fn 131 US tin riSS M IM
'"*'ht 6ent
Source
Da:a
(mrnl"W
PV%R t w
al toads
per Flald
Vokena d
each Load"
(9.090 s)
TofaI Vcleme
(ge£orra)
(2) x (3)
VGWm perAcre
(gariomlaerey
(4)1(A)
W ette k-Qh8ia
PAM`
(IofTD00 gaQ
PAR Apoed
(twocre)
(6) x(6)11U
Moow Ha:e.Iae—
(wexe)
- (7
188
sp2
3J2WO17
20
5,300
106,000
1,927
4.43
8,64
187.46
312 M I T
14
6,300
74,200
1,349
4.43
5.98
181.49
4WO17
8
7,400
59,200
1.076
4.43
4,77
176.72
313012017
16
5,300
84,600
1,542
4.43
6.83
169.$9
Crop Cyrda Totals: 324,200
Owrw% Signature Spreader Operatoes Sgr.@Wm
Ctartrfied Operator (print) i , Operator CartifcW'cn No.
26.11
Can be fbvod m operatoes manual for the spreader_ Cordsc! a (brat dealer 9 you donut have yourawnees manual.
`• See your +tracts rnaragfsr ent "for samplir9 frequency. At a minimum, waste anslyars 4 requlrad wVh in 80 trays of land appAoatlon events.
*"Eror the value r"iued by subtrectlnp column (7) turn (8). Contha sMad-ng ca'umn (7) ftom column (8) foloWng each appkwtian ever?.
*"Maernutriantsoarce (W. Lagm-Mo ge Pored 18, comrnerfcarferllzar, drvftter, ate.) 12/2f1120176

Fr
w
Le
NCDAW4AAroinoWcDivision Phn :.fA1$}733 6d - WaDtit$: �arrei.rwBitrmerlaftronorntl_
i "S `,• t
Predictive
CHoW, Koopman Dairy
4105 Meredell Farm
Rd
AdWsac 1
ji
Waste I P' �
Ub", NC 27298
;?
Randolph County
samrsm 1211&2016 14ecahlid: 1fiJ2MOM
cpw.a:01/04i2017
Farm: 764D
LinkstoHslptalkftrrnadon
Sam Intorntalton
Nubientand 00w 6Aeasurawwwts
Mra12an (N) (Avrrr) P faw)
K wm) Ca &=I A+n
S apvr.} Fe ftlnw Mn ` on*
I.n Ihem)
Cu twn) B Wnj Na Opmj C. (Dwi
sanwgelD: 1
Total 213
1010 467 254
lio 31,2 4.87
8.30
2.64 0.09 410
Wears Code: LSD
0"Orkwon:
ToW Kj&!daN N 1330
Dairy L4 8-1m-
PH
DM (R) sS (to•sslcmj
EC rMSICM)
CCE (%)
Al E0000 981.) CN
Incruanrc N
'N 7.12
Coapmeats:
NO3-,1t
orvertic 14 Ali f w)
Cd rh") Ph rpom) Al room?
S8 formi Li UAmi As
farm Criocmi Co (ham) C1 fom) hM tow)
Uffla
18.6
Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop Ob 11000 gal.}
Other Moments {lb 11000 gsl.)
AAaffeaUbnM4Mad
N Pips K20 Ca W
5 Fe r1h 2n
Cu 8 AC
CI Ne
N1 Cd Pb At Se U
Broadcast
4.43 4.08 10.1 3.89 2.12
0.92 0.26 0.04 0.07
0.02 0.01
3.60
0..15
AgrerwraWs Conwnembw
Hunter G. Landis 11=171:18 FM
Nat[h�Collna
a
I. al ci inrk ri>~.f C �'Yc+4hslf
Reprogramn"dng of the teborakwy-information-management system that makes this repot posalbis In be:nq funded
through a grant hm the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Cor- fdoolnn.
Ykank yrxu for using agranamia jervires to manage Muldentr and safeguard eAvfrwrm Mal gwdiry.
- SMers Irar m Camm&sioncr of
w1

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
June 28, 2017
MEMORANDUM:
To: Christine Lawson
From: Sherri V. Knight VP
Subject: Recommendation for Civil Penalty
Case #: DV-2017-0035
Koopman Dairies Inc (Ard Koopman)
AWC760060 - Randolph County
Please find attached, documents supporting the Winston-Salem Regional Off ce's request for a civil
penalty assessment against Koopman Dairies Inc for the: 1) unpermitted discharge of animal waste into
Sandy Creek (WS-III, Cape Fear River Basin) from a receiving field; 2) application of animal waste onto
fields not listed in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); 3) failure to incorporate
manure into bare soil within two days after land application; and 4) failure to consider pending weather
conditions in making the decision to apply waste.
Staff from the Winston-Salem Regional Office Division of Water Resources (WSRO-DWR) performed
an investigation on April 6, 2017 in response to an anonymous complaint alleging the run-off of animal
waste from land off Old Red Cross Road in Randolph County. Our investigation confirmed three
different active discharges from a 55-acre tract which was not listed in the CAWMP. Staff also
documented that waste was applied onto bare soil on April 3, 2017 and had not been tilled -in within 48
hours and that rain had been.forecast for the date of application.
We request -that you initiate appropriate action from your office and forward the attached package to the
Director of the Division of Water Resources. The following items are being transmitted for your review:
A) A completed "Findings and Decisions and Assessment of Civil Penalties."
B) A completed "Water Quality Enforcement Case Assessment Factors."
C) Recent correspondence between the violator and DWR, including a copy of the NOV/NOl letter.
D) Photographs depicting the violations.
E) Maps illustrating discharge locations and land ownership.
F) Supporting documents, including laboratory results
Please contact Melissa Rosebrock in our office at [phone] for any additional information you
may need.
Attachments
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office Facility Files

Findings and Decisions
and
Assessment of Civil Penalties
Attachment A

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
IN THE MATTER OF
KOOPMAN DAIRIES INC
FOR VIOLATION OF
NCGS 143-215.1(a)
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO
THE WATERS OF THE STATE
OF NORTH CAROLINA
WITHOUT A PERMIT
AND
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTALQUALITY
FILE No. DV-2017-0035
FINDINGS AND DECISION
} AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
FOR VIOLATIONS OF CATTLE WASTE )
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM )
GENERAL PERMIT AWG200000 )
PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA )
GENERAL STATUE 143-215.10C )
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental
Quality, I, S. Jay Zimmerman, Director of the Division of Water Resources (DWR), make the
following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Ard Koopman owns and operates Koopman Dairies Inc., a permitted dairy cattle
operation located on Meredell Farm Road in Randolph County. Per Randolph County tax
records, the dairy property is owned by Koopman Dairies Inc.
B. Koopman Dairies Inc. was issued Certificate of Coverage AWC760060 (hereby referred
to as COC) under Cattle Waste Management System General Permit AWG200000
(hereby referred to as permit) for Koopman Dairies Inc on February 10, 2012 effective
upon issuance, with an expiration date of September 30, 2014. This permit has been
renewed every five years and was most recently renewed on May 27, 2016, with an
expiration date of September 30, 2019.
Prior to ownership by Koopman Dairies Inc., regional office records indicate that the
permit had been issued to David Falk under Kings Mill DCF, LLC (October 1, 2006),

Arlin Buttke under Buttke Dairy Enterprises (March 12, 2004), and David Meredith
under Meredell Farm, Inc. (February 18, 2002).
C. Permit condition No. II.2. states that "No waste shall be applied onto areas not included
in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) or upon areas where the
crop is insufficient for nutrient utilization." The permit maintains that waste may be
applied up to thirty (30) days prior to planting or breaking dormancy only if the CAWMP
allows.
30 kr aS
Records submitted by the permittee document that al waste was applied onto bare
ground owned by Koopman Dairies Inc on March 25, 29, 30 and April 3, 2017. At the
time of our investigation, the receiving tract was not listed in the CAWMP and a crop had
not yet been planted to utilize the nutrients. The permittee's 10-day response letter
indicates that the field was planted sometime between April 8 and May 9, 2017.
D. Permit condition No. II.22. states that "the Permittee shall consider pending weather
conditions in making the decision to apply waste..." Application records document that
on April 3, 2017 Koopman Dairies Inc applied 59,200 gallons of animal waste (4.77 lbs.
plant available nitrogen per. acre) onto 55 acres of a denuded and unpermitted tract of
land.
The National Weather Service (NWS) forecast for April 3, 2017 was for rain and
thunderstorms in and around the application area. Records submitted by Koopman
Dairies Inc indicate that there was a 65% chance for 0.29 inches of precipitation near the
application field on April 3, 2017. The permittee's records also document that "a little
less than 0.50 inches' of rain fell on or near the application field on April 3, 2017 and
that a total of "less than 0.75 inches" of rain occurred on the three days following the
April 3, 2017 application event.
E. Failure to incorporate manure into bare soil within two days after land application, or
prior to the next rainfall event, is a violation of permit condition No. II.7. On the date of
the complaint investigation, Winston-Salem Regional Office (hereby referred to as
WSRO) staff noted that waste had been applied to the receiving tract on March 25, 29, 30
and April 3, 2017 and that the waste had not been incorporated within two days or prior
to the April 3, 2017 rain event. The permittee's response letter notes that a disk was used
to incorporate the manure on April 8, 2017.
E. Permit condition No. I.1. states that "any discharge of waste that reaches surface waters
or wetlands is prohibited except as otherwise provided in this General Permit and
associated statutory and regulatory provisions. Waste shall not reach surface waters or
wetlands by runoff, drift, manmade conveyance, direct application, direct discharge or
through ditches, terraces, or grassed waterways not otherwise classified as state waters."
On April 6, 2017 staff from the Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regional
Office WSRO) investigated a complaint alleging that Koopman Dairies Inc applied
animal waste in such a manner as to cause the runoff of waste into Sandy Creek, a WS-III
water within the Cape Fear River Basin. On April 6, 2017 WSRO staff observed an

illegal discharge of animal waste from a 55-acre tract of land, owned by Koopman
Dairies Inc, located off Old Red Cross Road in Randolph County (parcel identification
number 8707191668). The discharge was not discovered or reported to the WSRO by
Koopman Dairies Inc.
F. On April 21, 2017, the DWR-WSRO responded by issuing a Notice of Violation/Notice
of Intent to Enforce (NOVINOI) to Ard Koopman of Koopman Dairies Inc for: 1)
applying animal waste to fields not in the CAWMP; 2) failing to incorporate manure into
bare soil within two days or prior to the next rainfall event; and 3) the unpermitted
discharge of animal waste into waters of the State. The NOVINOI was sent Certified mail
and received by Mr. Koopman's wife on May 2, 2017. The DWR-WSRO received a
response from the violator on May 12, 2017.
N. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in these matters totaled $1,407.52.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Koopman Dairies Inc is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to
G.S. 143-212(4).
B. Koopman Dairies Inc violated permit condition No.1I.2. by applying waste onto areas not
included in the CAWMP or upon areas where the crop was insufficient for nutrient
utilization.
C. Koopman Dairies Inc violated permit condition No. I1.22. by failing to consider pending
weather conditions in making the decision to apply waste.
D. Koopman Dairies Inc violated permit condition No. I1.7. by failing to incorporate manure
into bare soil within two days after land application, or prior to the next rainfall event.
E. Koopman Dairies Inc violated permit condition No. 1.1. by causing the discharge of waste
to reach surface waters due to runoff.
F. Koopman Dairies Inc may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A (a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand
dollars ($25,000) per violation per day may be assessed against a person who is required
but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1, or who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of such permit or
any other permit or certification issued pursuant to authority conferred by this Part.
G. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Koopman Dairies
Inc pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).

H. The Director of Division of Water Resources,, pursuant to delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality, has the authority to assess civil
penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Koopman Dairies Inc., owned by Ard Koopman at the time of non-compliance,
is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ O0 (�)
Ir
$ 1,407.52
R
for violation of permit condition II.2. by applying animal waste onto
areas not included in the CAWMP.
for violation of permit condition No. 11.22. by failing to consider
pending weather conditions in making the decision to apply waste.
for violation of permit condition II.7. by failing to incorporate manure
into bare soil within two days after land application or prior to the next
rainfall event.
for violation of permit condition I.I. by causing the unpermitted
discharge of animal waste into waters of the State.
Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at N.C.G.S.
143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.

IV. NOTICE:
I reserve the right to assess civil penalties and investigative costs for any continuing violations
occurring after the assessment period indicated above. Each day of a continuing violation may be
considered a separate violation subject to a maximum $25,000.00 per day penalty. Civil penalties
and investigative cost may be assessed for any other rules and statutes for which penalties have
not yet been assessed.
V. TRANSMITTAL:
These Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision shall be transmitted to Koopman
Dairies Inc, in accordance with N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(A)(d).
(Date) S. Jay Zimmerman P.G., Director
Division of Water Resources

Assessment Factors
June 28, 2017
Violator: Ard Koopman -- Koopman Dairies Inc
Owner: Koopman Dairies Inc
Region: Winston-Salem
Case Number: DV-2017-0035
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to public health or to
private property:
While no fish kills were reported, there was the potential for impact to the Town of Ramseur's
water supply, located 17 miles downstream, since the impacted portion of the stream is
classified as a WS-III. A total of 59,200 gallons of animal waste was applied to the receiving
field on April 3, 2017.
High levels of fecal coliform (see #3, below) is a public concern and could have put anyone in
contact with the water at risk for contamination. The unpermitted discharge of waste into Sandy
Creek certainly impacted private land since the receiving stream flows directly onto a
neighboring property not owned by Mr. Koopman or Koopman Dairies Inc.
2. The duration and gravity of the violations:
Documents show that Koopman Dairies Inc applied waste onto land not listed in the CAWMP
on April 3, 2017 and that the application area received a little less than 0.5 inches of rain that
day. The area also received some additional rain after the date of application. Since a discharge
of waste from the receiving field was still actively occurring on April 6, 2017, it is possible that
the unpermitted discharge of waste could have been occurring for three days.
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality:
Samples taken by WSRO staff of the waste leaving the application field indicate that very high
levels of fecal coliform (>60,000 coll100mL), nutrients, and biochemical oxygen demand
(BOD=1,300) were illegally discharged into Sandy Creek. Samples of the waste source obtained
by the permittee also indicate high levels of BOD (12,000) and fecal coliform (2,4000,000
MPN/100 mL).
In the opinion of the WSRO, the animal waste odor emanating from the 55-acre application
field was much stronger than is typical, possibly due to such a large application area with no
receiving crop as well as no/few trees to help buffer the smell. Since the receiving stream level
was unusually high due to recent rains, there was no expected impact on the quantity of water
due to the unpermitted discharge.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage:
At this point, there is no way to rectify the stream damage caused by the discharge of animal
waste. The manure was incorporated into the soil approximately five days after application.

Assessment Factors — DV-2017-0035
Koopman Dairies Inc
June 28, 2017
Page 2
There would, therefore, be an unknown labor and fuel cost associated with soil incorporation.
There is no cost associated with the unpermitted fields being added to the CAWMP since a
Randolph County NRCS technical specialist is now working on this.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance:
There does not appear to be any actual money saved by applying waste to a nonpermitted field,
not incorporating the waste, and by applying the waste when some rain was forecast. However,
there could be a substantial amount of time saved by not waiting for the fields to be added to the
waste plan, and the timing of the applications due to weather and workload limitations. This
could equate to money -saved by Koopman Dairies Inc.
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally:
Records submitted by Koopman Dairies Inc indicate that there was a 65% chance for 0.29
inches of precipitation near the application field on April 3, 2017. The permittee's records also
document that "a little less than 0.50 inches" of rain fell on or near the application field on April
3, 2017. The regional office does not believe the discharge violation to have been committed
willfully or intentionally, but rather, the result of negligence and poor judgement.
The WSRO believes that Koopman Dairies Inc. willfully and intentionally chose to violate their
permit by applying waste not listed in the waste plan and by not incorporating the waste
immediately. Mr. Koopman owns and manages other dairies in both the WSRO and
Moorsesville Regional Office and thus, should be aware of these permit conditions.
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority:
There is no record of previous violations by Koopman Dairies Inc. under AWC760060 after
receiving permit as a new owner on February 10, 2012.
2015 -- Mooresville Regional Office Civil penalty of $8,124.78 (including costs) for
unpermitted discharge, unpermitted major modification to CAWMP, and failure to notify of
non -compliant event related to AWC490040. Of the penalty amount, $1,000 was remitted. PC-
2015-0001.
April 2012 — Civil penalty assessed against AWC760012 for $10,123.88 (including costs) for
discharge, applying on saturated ground, failure to inspect site, and failure to maintain buffer. At
the time of the violations, Mr. Koopman was a manager/tenant, not an owner, permittee, or
OIC. Of the penalty amount, $1,000 was remitted. DV-2012-0009.
May 2012 —NOV issued to AWC760012 for failure to maintain well and dwelling buffers, no
crop on receiving field, and lack of soil tests. At the time of the violation Mr. Koopman was the
manager/tenant and OIC, but not the owner or permittee. NOV 2012-PC-0175.

Assessment Factors — DV-2017-0035
Koopman Dairies Inc
June 28, 2017
Page 3
8. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Investigator - 7 hours field time and 24 hours enforcement time $1,092.13
Sherri V. Knight - 1 hour for enforcement review $ 45.22
Laboratory tests 114.31
Mileage - 114 miles @ 0.49 55.86
Administrative Costs 100.00
Total Cost $1,407.52
9. Type of Violator:
Koopman Dairies Inc. is owned and operated by Ard Koopman.
10. Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to restore) or recalcitrance:
Mr. Koopman has been cooperative throughout the investigation. After the violations were
noted, the waste was incorporated as soon as field conditions allowed. Mr. Koopman promptly
contacted his technical specialist regarding the potential to add the unpermitted 'receiving fields
to the waste plan.
11. Mitigating factors:
During a June 27, 2017 inspection at one of Mr. Koopman's other farms (AWC990008), Mr.
Koopman stated that because application records from 2010-2011 indicate that the unpermitted
tract/fields received waste, he believed those fields to already be in the CAWMP. This
information was not submitted with the earlier written responses (April 11 and May 9, 2017).
12. Assessment factors:
A. IWC ---- NA
B. Receiving Stream ----- NA
C. SOC/JOC--------- NA
D. Copy of MP Screen ----- NA
E. Copy of Limits Page ---- NA
F. Damage ------ NA
Certification:
I certify that the information in this report is true to the best of my knowledge.
aZe I oz017 Aa-�� &IUA-�
(Date) Principal Investigator

NC"
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
April 21, 2017
=IFIEED MAIL No. 7015 0640 0005 8164 0926
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ard Koopman
Koopman Dairies, Inc.
204 Loyd Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Notice of Violation and Notice of Intent to Enforce
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZD AAERMAN
Director
N01-2017-DV-0077
Permit Number: AWC760060
Parcel ID# 8707191668, 8708114338, 8708106667, 7798919504 and 878111770
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Koopman:
On April 6, 2017, Meilssa Rosebrock and Patrick Mitchell of the Division of Water Resources (Division)
Winston-Salem Regional Office conducted a site inspection of the above referenced properties in
response to complaints alleging excess odor and the runoff of sediment and animal waste. A copy of
the inspection repodis attached for your review.
Accordingly, the following observations and violations wore noted:
1. A discharge of cattle waste into Sandy Creek was observed from two different locations of the
application field on the south side of Old Red Cross Road. Sandy Creek Is -also classified as a WS-Ill
(water supply) water within the Cape Fear River Basin. WSRO did not receive notice of the
discharge from anyone with Koopman Dairies, Inc. prior.to the Division's discovery of the
discharges on March 6, 2017.
On March 6, 2017 Division staff sampled the run-off waste just prior to its entry into Sandy Creek
for fecal coliform, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and nutrients. The results are as follows:
Fecal Coliform = >60,000 col/100mL
BOD =1,300 mg/L
NHs as N = 47 mg/L as N
NO2+NO3 = 1.2 mg/L as N
Total phosphorus = 23.0 mg/L as.P
Total Kjeldahl N =110 mg/L as N
We of Nodh Caroina I En*onmental Quilty
460 W, lianas Mil Road, Suite 300, WlnstonSelam, Nodh Carolina 27105
Phone: 336.T7M01 FAX: [phone]

„oopman -- NOV/NOI
April 21, 2017
Page 2
No discoloration was noted in the surface waters upstream of the recently cleared application
area while the surface water was much darker in color, with more discolored foam, downstream
of the denuded application fields, which suggests the discharge was occurring prior to the April 6,
2017 investigation. The unpermitted discharge of animal waste Into surface waters is a violation
of condition 1.1. of the Cattle Waste Management System General Permit (Permit).
Condition 11.22. also states that "the Permittee shall consider pending weather conditions in
making the decision to apply waste...” You may recall that the National Weather Service (NWS)
forecast for April 3, 2017 was for rain and thunderstorms in and around the application area.
During phone conversations with the Division, Koopman Dairies, Inc. indicated that they "quit .
applying waste when it started to rain." Koopman Dairy records indicate that less than 0.50 inches
of rain fell on April 3, 2017 and less than 0.75 Inches on the three days following application. NWS
records confirm that the following weather conditions were recorded in and around the area for
April 3, 2017: "Thunderstorms, heavy rain, rain, light rain, fog" and at least 0.70 inches of rain
between April 3-4, 2017. SLUR-2 records Indicate that 59,200 gallons of waste was applied to 55
acres of tract 10730 on April 3, 2017 (1,076 gallons per acre).
Division staff also documented sediment run-off from the newly cleared land. This is most likely
caused by the lack of vegetation on the steep slopes and recent rain events. Some ruts have also
formed in the fields and are a conveyance for sediment and waste.
2. The site inspection and records review also confirms that animal waste was applied to fields not
In the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMIP). Per submitted application records,
waste was applied to tract 10730. This tract is NOT listed.in any of the followingversions of the
CAWMP: 3/9/2016; 5/7/2010; 4/17/2008; 8/7/2006.
The inspection also documents that animal waste had been applied.to the small grain crop in the
fields across the road (north side of Old Red Cross Road) as evidenced by the waste on the stems
and leaves of the plants and slurry equipment tracks in the fields. Records indicate that Randy Joe
Garner owns these fields and that they are NOT listed in the CAWMP. The application of waste
upon areas not included in the CAWMP is a violation of permit condition 11.2.
An unusually strong waste odor was detected in and around the application areas. Our
investigation concluded that animal waste was applied March 25-April 3, 2017 to recently cleared
and denuded land in tract 10730 and not tilled -in until 3/8/2017. Failure to Incorporate manure
Into bare soil within two days after land application, or prior to the next rainfall event, is a
violation of permit condition 11.7.
Required Response:
Accordingly, you are directed to respond in writing within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of this
Notice. Your response should be sent to my attention at -the letterhead address and must include
specific plans and timeline for permanently addressing the following:

l
..japman — NOWN01
April 21, 2017
Page 3
1. Immediately establish a vegetative cover for ALL fields in tract 10730 that received animal
waste. You should also repair the ruts that have formed on the denuded land so that future run-
off might be minimized. A permanent vegetated buffer in the area along the stream should be
created to help prevent furtherYun-off of sediment. and manure during rain events.
2. Receiving fields located In the parcels listed above must be approved and added to the CAWMP
prior to ANY future waste application events. if these fields are not deemed suitable for waste
application, then no animal additional waste may be applied.
3. Application records submitted to the WSRO for tract 10730 did not include the required "weather
code." A completed SLUR-1 form, which includes the weather code, should therefore be
submitted to the Winston-Salem Regional Office. We request that you submit application records
for those fields that received waste on the north side of Red Cross Road as well. Please note that
the 12/18/2016 waste analysis used to complete the submitted SLUR-2 form -was not conducted
within sixty days of application. Thus, a new waste analysls.should be obtained as soon as
possible.
This Office is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement to the Director of the Division
of Water Resources regarding these issues and any future/continued violations that may be'
encountered. This office requires that the violations, as detailed above, be abated immediately and
properly resolved. Pursuant to G.S.143-215.6A, these violations and any future violations are
subject to a civil penalty assessment 'of up to a maximum of $25,000.00 per day for each violation.
Your above -mentioned response to this correspondence, the degree. and extent of harm to the
environment and the duration and gravity of the violations) will be considered in any civil penalty
assessment process that may occur.
Please contact Melissa Rosebrock (336-776-9699) or -me (336-776-96. 96) if you have questions
concerning this Notice.
Sincerely,-
_?,�wpU-007
Sherri V. Knight, P. E. ■ Carnptete trams 1, 2, and & atom. 0
c
retum
Regional Supervisor ; ■ t � name and address Regional reverse
so that we oeit the card to You. e.. ed by (pK W
!'
Water Quality Regional Opera ■ Attach this ca[d to the back of the meitptem
or on the front tf epece Perm". D. � d�Y address dt�areatf m Rem 7 -
Division of Water Resources,'N saw---------=---��. �y��delhreryaddreeabelw .13 No
i Mr. Ard Koopman a
Attachment i', Koopman Dairies, Inc.
i
�i
cc: wsao File copy 11 204 Loyd Road
Statesville, NC 28625 `
NCDEQDWR-Animal Waste Feed) ,
Randolph County NRC5 and Soil d a.
�, Il��ll11I11111�111i41111�1fll�ll�llllllill�li13
9590 9403 0921 5=3 9827 0
7Ci35 0640 04d5 8164 0926
�
O Prbdly and bprddle
O � sbnd Mal ft u MdVVNW �
Ro tww Doklway
IntedC�llwrY
QFirbimR�Qe�llbt 1
n-pahory C tired OeAvHy C1& fro ftan ,
Aes1 o.+w�yF41001111,10
GOW" i
u
DoMMM Realm R9GelPt �

Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 760060 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC760060 [] Denied Access
In action Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Complaint
Date of Visit.. 04/06/2017 Entry Time: 10:15 am Exit Time
Farm Name: Koopman Dairies Inc
County: Randolph Region:
12:00 pm Incident 0
Owner email:
Owner: Koopman Daises Inc Phone:
Mailing Address: 204 Lloyd Rd Statesville NC 28625
Physical Address: 4105 Meredall Farm Rd
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant Integrator:
Liberty NC 27298
Winston-Salem
1201S000_10
704-876-4909
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35" 51' 22" Longitude: 79° 38' 27"
Farm address: 4718 Ramseur- Julian Road, Liberty, NCUS Hwy 421 south from GSO. Right onto Old Liberty Rd. Right onto
Ramseur -Julian Rd. Farm is on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ard Koopman Operator Certification Number: 997080
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ard Koopman Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Ard Koopman Phone : [phone]
Primary inspector. �MelAis�s6-- 776— 9(og9
�a Rosebrock ��� J�� `r Phone: � a o'
Inspector Signature: `-'I VLL� VI Date: `t
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
1. Observed animal waste flowing from application fields into Sandy Creek (Water Supply III, Cape Fear River Basin). WSRO-DWR
sampled the run-off waste, just prior to its entry into Sandy Creek, for fecal coliform, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and
nutrients. The fecal coliform result= >60,000 col/100mL.
2. Site conditions: Temperature=56 degrees F; very windy; partly sunny turner cloudier and colder, very strong waste odor on
areas nearest Old Red Cross Road. Dead worms were observed in puddles of waste in the field. Puddles were very dark in color.
Application tracks from slung equipment were noted in the fields. Waste had been applied to small grain on fields across the
road. Stream is 10-15 feet wide. Stream water was much darker in color, with more discolored foam, downstream of the denuded
application fields, which suggests discharge had been occurring prior to our arrival today. No discoloration noted in the stream
and tributary upstream of the recently cleared land that had received animal waste.
3. Observed sediment run-off from newly cleared land caused by the lack of vegetation on the steep slopes and the heavy rains on
4/2/2017 and 415/2017. Some gullies have also formed and are a conveyance for sediment and waste,
11. Waste was applied to land not in the CAWMP. Regardless, the permit requires that waste be tilled -in within 2 days of
application which began 3/25/2017 and ended 41312017. Waste was not tilled -in until 41812017,
14. Some of the acreage within the unpermitted tractlfields had an established small grain crop. Waste was observed on the
stems and leaves of the small grain plants.
15. Need to immediately establish a vegetative cover for ALL fields that received animal waste. Many acres are completely
denuded of vegetation,
21. The application records received by the WSRO for tract 10730 did not include documentation of 120 minute inspections. This
will need to be submitted to the regional office.
29. The waste odor eminating from application tract #10730 was stronger than is typical, possibly due to the large amount of
acreage receiving waste in a short period of time.
30. The alleged discharge was reported by a complainant and investigated while the OIClowner was out of town. WSRO did not
receive notice of the discharge from anyone with Koopman Dairies, Inc. prior to our visit on 41612017.
32. Per OiClOwner's records, waste was applied to tract 10730. This tract is NOT listed in any of the following versions of the
waste plan: 31912016; 5/7/2010; 4117/2008; 81712006. Tech specialist confirmed that the recently cleared application tract
(#10730), which received the waste, is not in the waste plan. However, Koopman Dairies, Inc. does own this land. Fields receiving
animal waste, located across the road, are owned by Randy Joe Gamer.
33. Spoke to Mr. Koopman about odor complaint on 4/3/2017 while he was traveling out of town. He stated that only a half -inch of
rain had been predicted for 0410312017, Waste was applied by Mr. Koopman and his certified operators, however, Mr. Koopman
slated that they quit applying when it started to rain. Left message on 4/5/2017 for Mr. Eric Isley, farm manager, stating that we had
now received another call regarding the run-off of manure from the unvegetated application fields. The WSRO did not receive a
return call from Mr. Isley. WSRO spoke to Mr. Koopman again on 0410712017, OwnerlOIC said he was "trying to apply waste to stay
ahead of the game" with regards to the weather and the limited opportunities available to apply waste and plant corn in the spring.
34. WSRO may need to follow-up as necessary to ensure compliance.
page: 2

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Dumber. 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection -Reason for Visit: Complaint
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
rl Cattle -Milk Cow 5,000
Total Design Capacity: 5,000
Total SSLW: 7,000,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond
04
18.00
96.00
Waste Pond
LARGE WSP #3
28.00
Waste Pond
LOWER STAGE #2
24.00
Waste Pond
UPPER STAGE #1
12.00
page: 3

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number. 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17- . •. Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: - Complaint
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
0
110
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
Other
❑
a, Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
M.
❑ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
16-20 gal
min, during 1A5
hr inspection, more prior to
that
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
N
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storane & Treatment
YAe
No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑0
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
E ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ Cl
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aopllcation
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility ! Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: - 04/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste Application
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Small Grain
(Meat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 2
No cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
■
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yas No Na Na
% Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑ M
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility: Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 . . Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Records and Documents
yes No Na No
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ N
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
-Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
Otherlssues
e No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
if Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or E ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? E ❑ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
page: 6

Rosebrock, Melissa
From: Monique Koopman <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 5:01 PM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa
Subject: RE: Fwd: Koopman Complaint
Ok thanks, waste reports should be in your fax.
Enjoy your night,
Monique
Sent from my Yerizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid
On Apr 10, 2017 4:58 PM, "Rosebrock, Melissa" <[e-mail]> wrote:
Monique, here's the number: 336.776.9797
Thank you!
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
[e-mail]
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
-5�^Nothlnq Compares,,"
S.
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Monique Koopman [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 3:35 PM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa <melissa.rose [e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Koopman Complaint
Hi Melissa,
Do you have a fax number?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid
On Apr 4, 2017 2:17 PM, "Rosebrock, Melissa" <melissa.rosebrock ncdenr. ov> wrote:
It appears that you may have applied animal waste onto fields not in the waste plan.

&ent from my Verizon Wireless 40 LTE smartphone
------ Original message --------
From: "Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC"
Date:04/04/2017 9:08 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Rosebrock, Melissa"
Subject: RE: Koopman Complaint
They're not part of the latest (3/16/16) plan that I have.
From: Rosebrock, Melissa[mailto:melissa.rosebrock&cdenr.govl
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 5:23 PM
To: Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC <[e-mail]>
Cc: Randy Freeman <Rand .Freeman andol hcoun nc. ov>
Subject: Koopman Complaint
Randy,
Got a complaint today, mostly about odor, regarding land application activities off Old Red Cross Road. Caller
was also concerned about runoff.
Question: Are these parcels in his waste plan? Ard says the fields at the front of the property (near road?) are in the
plan, but he's not sure about the rest. There are about 110 total acres and he says he has cleared about 2/3 of it.
Complainant says he has applied waste on all the cleared land.
Per GIS, the following parcels are owed by Koopman Dairies, Inc., just need to know if they are in his waste plan.
Thank you! 1
PIN 8707191668
PIN 8708114338
PIN 8708106667
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
2

NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
melissa.rosebrockAmcdenr.gov
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Nothing Compares.,,.
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any
unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the
law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.
3

Rosebrock, Melissa
From: Monique Koopman <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 8:35 AM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa
Subject: Re: Requirements as a result of the discharge
Hi Melissa,
I faxed a copy of the letter to the fax number you gave me the other day. A hard copy is in the mail. Thanks for
reminding us!
Monique Koopman
From: Rosebrock, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:18:51 AM
To: Ard Koopman
Subject: Requirements as a result of the discharge
Ard (and Monique),
As you know, I observed the discharge of waste from the fields off Old Red Cross Road. When there is a discharge,
there are certain requirements that must then be met. If you have not already done so, let me remind you to
about the following permit conditions:
III. 9. and 111.13 — If/when you have knowledge of a discharge you must notify our office within 24 hours. I
observed the discharge before anyone from the dairy but you should still send a written report to our office with
answers to 111.9. a-f.
111.13. page 10 — A written report must be sent to our office addressing the requirements in the permit (page 10,
middle of the page). This was due within 5 days but you should still send that to us. It is very similar to the above
report. Note that "f." requires that a sample be taken of the waste and -analyzed for the parameters listed. This is
different to your normal waste analysis. The closest lab is probably Research and Analytical Labs in Kernersville.
The fecal coliform bacteria sample has a short hold time and a special bottle you get from the lab. The nutrients
require a special acid preservative. Ask the lab about that. Tell them you have had an animal waste discharge and
read paragraph 'T for them and ask them what to do from there. This was to have been completed within 72
hours but should still be completed and submitted.to us within 30 days.
Let me know if you have questions.
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
melissa.rosebrock ncdenr. ov
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300

a Koopman Dairies, Inc 7048782484 P.
Statesville April 11, 2017
Dear Mrs. Rosebrock,
In response to your Visit on April 61" the following:
On or about April 3"' we received notice from an alleged run of( From one of our fields. If
there was any run off we believe it was extremely minor in quantity. According to our
records we had less than 0.5 inch of rain on 4/3 and less 0.75 on the 3 days after. In a
normal scenario this should not be enough rain to cause any run off. If there was any
minor runoff it was accidental and not our intention.
7o be on the safe side we used a disk in the field on 3/8, this was the first day that we
could enter the field after the rain ended.
All waste samples are being processed by the lab in. Raleigh and as soon as results are in
we will forward them to you.
We apologize if we did have minor run off. We do our best to avoid situations like this as
our prior records show, We hope you take this into considcration,
Sincerely,
�p r ,..
oo man Dairies Inc
By Monique Koopman

Koopman Dairies, Inc 7048762064 p.1
Statesville April 11, 2017
Dear Mrs. Rosebrock,
In response to your visit on April 61h the following:
On or about April 31" we received notice from an alleged run off From one of our fields. If
there was any run off we believe it was extremely minor in quantity. According to our
records we had less than 0.5 inch of rain on 4/3 and less 0.75 on the 3 days after. in a
normal scenario this should not be enough rain to cause any run off, if there was any
minor runoff` it was accidental and not our intention.
To be on the safe side we used a disk in the Field on 3/8, this was the first day that we
could enter the Field after the rain ended.
All waste samples are being processed by the lab in Raleigh and as soon as results are in
we will forward them to you.
We apologize if we did have minor run off. We do our best to avoid situations like this as
our prior records show. we hope you take this into consideration,
Sincerely,
olio man Dairies Inc
P ,
By Monique Koopman

NC Department of
Environmental Quality
Received
MAY 12 2017
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
1mo
0*
000
Statesville May 9, 2017
Subject: NOI-2017-DV-0077
Dear Mrs Knight,
In response to your letter the following:
On April Y4 we applied manure to one of our newly acquired and recently cleared fields
which created an alleged run off. The weather forecast for that day was a 65% chance of
0.29 inches of rain for later in the afternoon. We included a screenshot of the forecast for
Liberty. We received more rain than forecasted, according to our records a little less than
0.5 inch. In your letter you refer to NWS records. Those records are either based on
weather in Asheboro or Siler City. This might be the difference in actual rainfall on our
location and NWS records as those cities are about 20 miles from our location. On the 3
days after the 3`d we received less than 0.75 inch according to our records for our
location. In a normal scenario this should not be enough rain to cause any run off. If there
was any minor runoff It was accidental and not our intention.
3 IS 7
On Q/8the first day the, held was dried up enough, we used a disk to incorporate the
mdmfe. As we could not enter the field prior to that date we do not believe we violated
permit condition 11.7.
We have submitted all information regarding the fields that were not in our plan yet to
Randy Blackwood, who will add them to our plan.
All fields have been planted in th last few weeks a d a permanent vegetated buffer has
been created on the new and rece leared fi lye d.
We have included a completed SLUR-1 form for tract 10730 and manure samples as
requested.
We were doing and will continue doing our best to be in compliance at all times,
Sincerely, Ard and Monique Koopman

Mao 09 2017 13:24 HP LHSERJET FHK
P.5
`,:�;ay,�.�!A;�L:;��.��f? y�'•i�:.'F"�7.3Aid17ra.—rt r�s$'d:-`�aYe�r.••-��3°'3'%��`i'i•��.~"'.�p�'`'�',`. �'I`"'" .. ...
Sampie'.P ervation Yefi#idatlon -
ENCd Cary
work Order: CA05670 Pr4jed VM1 svaterAfflec.
Client: Rgsidentlal/we" (RED15) PMIK4 : manur sample
Logged In. 42-kpr•i710:47 Logged By. Jahn C King
'ter ': •����t� 'll`r.��
Rea nt Name ID e hiLne ID
1 .. 3 5
2 4 9

May 09 2017 13117 HP LMSERJE7 FRX
EnvlronmerHal Conservstlon Laborstorfae. Inc.
10" WoodMada MdusWal Covrt
Cory NC, flail
Rime: 91IL"T.70" FAX: 910.4U.UlS
�1
aae /nos
wAnaaneauaa.aam
K-F— CUM Reskkadd Wa14ia1RFAt11
ma Loyd Rd p mal: ti'utennkr Mire, araa roe
Suta,;heNC,nus 1`40JdetNua1a: Marano Sample 11#jell II,(e
S fj� YTICAL_8ESU1:l'g
Santplc ll), Mrsure Bampte Labotmory Number: CA0117041
DoioSeapted-04VI211709:00 Sampled By: Viral
Date Received 04AV17 1041
AIIewFN.
Aadyn
ae,.a Nu,..
limit Uwn 0udine,
laaslcal Cbtmfslry Parameters
AaWgda rr V
aaw D
nuA
alnrheakd oartaa ormaotl
110aa D
man.
aU1 aw sd.d Amid$
amr
..at
Pa 4 1 of S
u The aaayW was analyzed for but not dKWvd ID the I.vel ovodm, adjusted far adual sample preparation
data and molcimm eanteFit. wheta applloble.
E The rnneentratlao Indicated for Ws ark§W Is in estmated value alzuva the ntbrauan range of the
Insitutrwlt Thla value Is mraldered 90 esWilte.
MILL MEOW Repoq+ng GFNL The ME is rwghb efILMlent to the prxtitat QuantIWOn (lmit (PQL) and Is
Slated M the low palM of the cNlbraboo curve, wlimaW kabte,,ample pnwaration (Ktar, dduOm
factor, and, in the me of soil sampl96 MOisDae carda+d.
hf thg analysts Wcirt ss ft proaeaca of an snW M for ~ f m is presumpldre evidence (SS% ar Oreater
confldem) to make a "tentet3w Idonllf lion".

Mai 09 2017 13:20 HP LASERJET FAX
Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc.
102-A Woodwinds Indualrial Court
Cary NC, 27811
Phone: 919,467.3020 FAX: 91PAS7.3515
P. 1
www.encolobs.com
Koopmen Client: ResidentiaL%Ikin (RE015)
204 Loyd Rd Project, Wastewater -Mist. ReporrW.,
Sutesviile NC, 2462S Projecl Number: Manure Sample 21-Apr-I T 11!(*
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample 10: Menu re Sample Laboratory Nwnber: CA05570-01
Date Samplcd: 04/1211709:00 Sampled By: Client
Datr Rercived: 04/12/17 10;41
Allowsbk
Nina Rewlt nwes Limit umu `=tncis
Classical Chemistry Parameters
Ammenle as uloo 0 twVt•
Blnehemleal Osygen Dewsnd 12ttaa A rt%t.
Tarsl fists endW Solids 23M am&
Page 1 Of 5

Mat$ 03 2017 13:20 HP LASERJET FAX
P.2
Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc. .
102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court e1Ms '
Cary NC, 27511
Phone: 919.4a7.3090 FAKt 919.487,3516 wwmencolabs.aam
Koopman Client: Residenl'W Welkin (RE015)
204 Loyd Rd Project Wauewater-Mist,
swesvilleNC, :66Z5 Project Number: Manure Sample 21-Apr-17 11 A6
Y rOMETTIOW
Sample 1D: Mananr Sample
Date Sampled: 04/L21I7 09:00
Date Received: 04/12/17 10:41
Allmrnble
LaboratoryNumbcr. CA05570.01REI
Sampled By: Client
.vM,lw Rssm[ Kwn Unit Units V=31)C 4
Microbloloevical Parameters
Colifavm Fecal 'x� Absent W141100mi
Analvtes that show an allowable limit of 0 have no wlabli3hed limit. Please refer to EPA.zov for questions about your waters Quality.
B The analyte was detected In the associated method blank.
D The sample was analyzed at dilution.
The reported value Is between the laboratory method detection Ilmit (MOL) and the laboratory method
reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable.
U The anOte was analyzed for but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisture content, where applicable.
E The concentretlon Indicated for this analyte Is an estimated value above the caltbraUcin range of the
Instrument. This value is mnsldered an e0mate.
MRL Method Reporting Umit. The MRL is rough* equivalent to the practical QUantltaUon limit (PQL) and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparston factor, dputton
factor, and, in the else of sop samples, moisture content.
N The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte for which there is presumptive evidence (85% or greater
confidence) to make a "tentative Identification".
Page 2 of 5

MM_09 2017 13:20 HP LHSERJET FAX
Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc.
102.A woodwlodo Industrial Court
Cary MC.27511
Phone: 912AB7 3D90 FAX: [phone]
p.3
... C
� aa>. aaa
www.eneolabs.cam
Koopma.i Client: ResidcntieuVft1Mn (REA15)
204 Loyd Rd Ptaject: Waatnvater-Mise. Reported;
Statesville NC.2S625 ProjectNtmfber. ManoceSample 21•Apr-1711:06
LAB.QBaOB-Y CERTIFIfATION SUMMAU
Anolysh Milydr Cerl ID Cert Namber
Ammonia 350.1
Water
NC
591
BOD SM5210B
Water
NC
591
Coliform, Fecal 9221E
%ter
NC
591
TS5 SWUM
water
NC
591
G
Bill .Scott, Project Mmagot
Page 3 o5

FORM SLUR-1 Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
For Recording Slurry Applicaton Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner Facility Number -
Spreader Operator
Tract &
Field #
Date
(mm/dd/yr)
""Weather
Code
Crop Type
Field Size
(acres)
Application
Method*
Number
of Loads
per Field
Volume of
each Load"
(gallons)
10730
3/25/2017
Gear
comsilage
55
br
20
5300
10730
3/29/2017
clear
comsilage
br
14
5300
10730
3/30/2017
clear
comsilage
br
16
5300
10730
4/3/2017
pc
consilage
br
8
7400
" Sl = soil incorporated (disked); BR = broadcast -(surface applied),
'* Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.
""' Weather Codes: C-Clear, PC-Partty Cloudy, CI -Cloudy, R-Rain, S-Snow/Sleet, W-Windy 3/14/2003

FORM SL.uR 2
Tract
Field Size"etted Acres)=(A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Records
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
10730 Fief #
55 Facility Number
Ard Koopman Spreader Operator
204 Lloyd Rd., Statesville, NC 28625 and Address
Owners Phone # [phone]
Operators Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type comsilage I Recommended PAN 1% I
Loading (Ib/acre) _ M)
(1) (21 (3) (4) fm (6) fn (8)
—Nutrient
Source
Date
(mm/dd/yr)
Number
of Loads
per Field
Volume of
each load'
(gallons)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume per Acre
(gallons/acre)
(4) ► (A)
Waste Analysis
PM—
(Ib/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(lblacre)
(6) x (5) 11000
Nitrogen Balance"'
(Nacre)
(8)-(7)
196
sp
3/25/2017
20
5,300
106,000
1,927
2.8
5.40
190.60
3/2912017
14
5,300
74,200
1,349
2.8
3.78
186.83
4132017
8
7,400
59,200
1,076
2.8
3.01
183.81
313=017
16
5,300
84.800
1,542
2.8
4.32
179.50
Crop Cycle Totals: 1 324,200
Owners Signature
Spreader Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (print) Operator Certification No.
16.50
' Can be found in operators manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owners manual.
See your waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each appllc ation event
"'Enter nutrient source (le. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry titter, etc.)
/2202006

'ncOA$cs Agronomic bMsIon RMM: MO) 733.2M Webs". www.Rcw4joweprorwmv t:Vi7
PredIcUn
Claret E(OOp w Oft Adw(sor-
4105 MtamM Farm Rd
Waste Report
.NC
asmp*w 04A)9l2017
Links to Helpful Information
Nledwl6 04(1012017 oanprwa: 04/14/2017 Fwm: 7"
Rmldalph County
PALS 0: 424M PALS A:
Sample lnfommum
NutrW and Other Mleaaurerunts
iwboaen (ul (A—) : Prom) K opo Ca ftW Mfg Il "
s (April) Fe Moo Mn 01Am) Zn Mw) Cu M m) 0 WM M o MW C (omo
%inaateAO 1
iiidsio Codb: t.So
TOWN Ise 543 310 231
8a.7 51L2 4.09 7.02 146 0.74
Dascrfrt".
t>etry Llq. Slurry
TohdPgwhNN 640............ ...................... ................•
SS
------- .-................... .. ...............................................
EC CCE BD
rn M&ft N PM DM (%) (f0ftft)
(mSkm) (%) ALE(1000 yeti C.111 (91cm
Carrnnento:
NHFN 726
NO3-N:.........---------------- ..------ ......... ...............
.......................................................................
Omanfe N Nl Mpm) Cd (wN Pb fbp V Al (Awn)
3e (AMM As (axW Cr ft n) No (April) C( (AVO
Urea 40.2
356
Estimate of Mutt" Aranahle for Pint Crop Ob r 1000 ear.)
Other EMmw to 011110006d.)
ADpikMWwAf dwd
N P2M .' K20 CO Mp a Fe Mn zn
Cu 0 No No C1 N! Cd Pb A So
Broadcast
2.80 3.24 0.43 3.00 1.93 0.74 0.46 0.03 0.08
0.02 0.01 L97 0.34
North Carolina
l.d¢kti, h rot 1 nrd (•nmo��er
Reprogramming of the I emeM ayotem that makes Oft report poesW Is Deft knded
through a grant from the North CaMna Tobaam Trent Fwmd Comffft m-
ThwAyou for -Ing agr/xlomlcservlc" to manage narrlems urudsq/aguard emdroamerua! quality.
- &vw TMder, CommtaslorrarofAgHadrure.

Koopman Dairies Inc
DV 2017-0035
COC #AWC760060
April 6, 2017
Winston-Salem Regional Office

J � a- ;tie.. "-9s:: �� __ �+ _ �•�au=.r.K - - -� ;c_;.-_ - a_c -; Win^
AIR
�� •� {,�.�� ray"•-�- ---''-'_. � +. __ _

ow
•�_s .�'�'if sJ, •`7 9.�i.�S..W�i, ... 3--Ir:P t. � �'X'=•�°¢hM.:r'�',�
i'=��'d'F�J�s3 /4..w a--Y _.•�-_ r __. � �.-n . -. _mow.. t.. _ . _ _ _

iN
s011EE
,4 11i7lti
r 'nS ir,��,�,�. r "F is •''..
u�
•d 1 '
ZF .N

•v:2�-r.
� 4��� �
-�-lei
.mac.. :e t nrt E3.7
-v.
k7t

S ={
Southern portion of recently cleared tract.
Note application of waste on April 3, 2017, and one,of
the gullies that has formed. Waste was not tilled -in
within 48 hours and a receiving crop had not been
established or planted.
First of two active unpermitted
discharges -occurring from the southern
portion of the unpermitted receiving
tract on April 6, 2017. Waste flowed
into WS-III waters of the State.

77-TT 17
NP
v SWAP
��--
'~.
-

--
-- —o
a�
__ — - f - "_' .r 3. _r _.�r..�,�f;^rr. C _1 � `Ts.. � Vic. «�,.
_. „... tit _ � � �' 1 ���� _�k"'EV.
_ � _ � - "����'-� � __tip'
f
N� �_� u � �_ ... .
r ' oi+
,� � Y

i c:i ;'rlr�a_ }'•. f� pr ( � � o�.y�s�� w�` ��YF�t��� "' � ►y � �`I�'T. r •,f � . } -r
i r ti '• L-LJ y...,' 1 S fi hf` T,", .<y1 rl'11 1 ��
. Fi j 1 I: 1r.!""t2,SY t �Ia;' v?C'1" Yr4.•'II 4 IiaL,
+6 rrI inl5 a A 1
�r� ,. •.i}h� r -{, a-? 1. ryp �w
��� fi r.'� R �,.•, 7 r � r"*-. _t �` I�����i rt '. .�.xi i,Y7
+ •'cq'31 ���; �T� -Z 4Y !{f Ptirrf.,
•n 4
��V +-1—+ +� 1��1•� 5tF {�F.�"' Y }.f .' it ��1s 1 1t,17 ✓'�i1�S"%�I £ 1 - r
.�{ Cam, r.. iii 1. kr o �• y/ 1 ': r L r a y ! C rt r r a.
.� 1 � C � rrlr7 S y �-'"• t,S ��`.� � C 4. f S 7 � , � � �ri #
fl `v t� " •1 � jj � 'i . �� F'bx1 1 + 7 I �1 ! r I[. �_,��}i4 ,.!1 S'A.i� nrY
�1+ I�lA if G �lY �. 1 I �1r I t'- 'A.y 1 117+43��+`7 �# � � rff rl. 1t �•',•I '' " 5 r � �
ihell4Y
$ fr � 1�+1 { 1 I l 7 �-_� I + •r�� Fi�'��'�.r(:; � �`; � Ir �� r� �' j r'+L4✓Tn +•jj
�} 3 1� � {1 i1 1 � - -_ c�,� 41 � 1{•'' ,K M, I: �, ¢ '' �'p 'r'iv� - i�` 4 � {3' � '� i ,ra�Y 't
t.; r' i "r!1'r rs"tis, is t Y S�^ ''L•ri 1 ti 1E +'• !y 71 a :�-. Sl Ni'^y e7.r4
I1 Y_ ..rely � � ! tf',. 1 _ 1 "t 1.�. il';4.r.'G� : 1 1 � :� . ,{• � ']f 1� 4 k}' '{��
��Tj� S„} 1 Y,> Y s ,.7 fi� `;4� , +I�,r {,� �. .�!{ '15: ,Pi1'. , u7�r Y :�'•�...'.�t��.�,�hy�L �s`?�r�~P,:
;''I "• '�,1 •.�Y� ,'r." `l��rX i-AsSt'a� ,,.,�,r'R .y. „ `siS.{�'Y��f;;y� �i�,° '%� '�}t; i�:�- �;
>. i�4� i h fir°- t9 _ � a o �� ��^ '* � r �%as•+yya v'�` :. � t 5t� w S
Y'+f = rll'? • r• 1[ a ;4x { 4'3 ..� 'I? r I ry f "T' t'� s l• M y i�1>ywl-
,'�'xg1 s'.; J `,• ; 'J T(� 1 "' g "r L �.
//fi�t ll r jWry
O �tf :# { .+�✓ 1 1 I —Ji i 11 - ��r" ,Yl{yYl 4f it to i � i" i 2� �r 7�•�i.,M,,'(1 �• i'S 1, ,�•
i,� r•`I • R S 5 -S` .G' �• f 'I . ��`1L # R•�r Yw 7S..d��c�pry: LkS�!`•`'�'
!�i i 7. ""..•. j i}I^ca••,r\r12rr' •1�� },�+�', y',�1 S -...'� ��y ..a .tiZk_.�?�As. l�.^•�:3.•
� ��` a-,4�� r.'t�;', r �s.+- 'i, , 9". f��-+��,• •x� I�,+,�`'{y����t ,yr�7fl fF36ir� '•'
'�Y }' i o - •. i-.^? { lk s.1; •' S i+ry• I a'SrL, 4 $ ?r.4Y:
•, i r 5 ?j1 f. � �'j r� ��; � ' s # S5 �k�. .a s. � i p+X' 1 I f�r �,, 1 �•k y,; rQ�7 � Y•t`
1sI�s.^:"? '' ii�i»+q 1, a a t 1 r. '�� 'i �s�'-t "+i g } .C�• `.L. t. ; r ' a
i r`' � c % ��a,7+y ' +9rs �°*Yg?.'.!' ' 1 c y y. c , i a - � _ i � , 5 r,i•
,, � ' �'"z�# � *�'. ;x �a,�t���r fat �, S' �'� . r �� c` I ' t ,, ,11 1 �,'l z <,� ,� rs' �.:[ � f f))�'4'�r �` r d { 3•}}�.
{ r >� r':"` � � 3 d. , +F. � � f �p [ it 's 7 c s , , .�2� c,} ,r, y h �• 1 � J,sr+ j #$�
,�..,,, � �.t,. + f Y r � , �.% 1 f ! �i+� 1 a • i`;�l+�'i °rA r 4�
t{�,+r L•� " s` '". �'''.5' F'�-�rs !-j a'��S r`�� i IS L L �{� s n ,pr +- ?� 1 1 ..1r`..
t r r[I 1 a � n Ark � f•.z��.k 4 1r�T f � +� r`3M aS S-1 { L � f r $ 5 I t`•�i Pt .F•.�ty�,~ y, .�
�,µt[L "eau �x..�•� [ F 7�� r� .� � 't'� �� [j,�l� �Ik44 S��ry?,,`r�,y ��"�42s� ��f � �{
}`trr`,I.d3u1i
1 � ti - iHS 1 ' I .ft'h C �s :!•'- Zito 6{v
y 7' Rv a �{ . •ca,`:,-a.^
!i
�a i•l E'T ,ry�ll ''}•,.�•t ,Q `f2 so .� e, .� •f �Frd -
,— �S� �`s.},,�r •����. �'•:'.}�'G�
ffr.: fix' •.1 [ {,,S i�t' FJ'ty }' [5'y"+_. rT�, _ �'�r �''n''�''•?,1 15 i�'�� " t`.1'''.p ft`:_.:s .
5Y f k, y3 7d Y
IJ1'R - L r.
r rr' S +•Nv' ri. ti "�„� sl J 1 }'j y 1' t t -0 sr':.,} �i,,,•, 1 - J,+�,.,r .` • - •j
r - w i..-.�.��..�� vim.., �• s, ,� y ! S � �" rW •... '� s: 1 1.s y`'.r�� "�,1`{al�, S j� �' k
�''#r-0-1%-xa,tr tikzt� 5 4, �Sti +,pp: T jTtil px� '•1,�ja. i
1"a ' F �� ': �� F ° a L° !� r''i3• ' kfl ,�,i $,L_.i `�H'�"
° rr� �� • lJ ri"1 `'� � rrfL }}a'A'I.. :a �i`�i'' s N - R„t 4, �, ., ' • � it _ .r�
:1 ! Z :i4s r 1, r ti i:rt of r -i f G1 yrI ;
rr`` tr ti �,LYaI .F ay.d
4 `�•a �i4 sY•w,i. � �-'L Y�? �'k: ,Z V �5�.'f,�_s� -'�' n -t �f x �'. ': "{l•:.
s F r. � 5 :3• rx �. !i, .[.S'i IgA tip; St. l.c-t i ti ,.ka r ,F '9 ! 1 ~,
+` 'I u - r�5 x�:>I'i��9� t�o:,� � ��- � I '� 2rT •v . I J I , ,-,.j i " �� y:.7 v, �' } � r
14'�s' � � 1 �t4 t M� h;:`s�'��!'[}' lFtli°.rl� �"°7i 5 � �e�1Y�' �� i a s� i`s �'�:•,.
�' ry�' �p•`� f'ik:i'. �: ai' aif�4� '�►�ty4 }7 F+i�' i �a'r t.... ;� �1' � ti 'xy��..���e�� k r ��r 5 " �'• •
lea: � `i��N i `• S4�,F�', �t ���A t If '�' yS � {�,y't r ..S til��'�.'i� , } -� � -
�i�` �,. - - ... -.�ar� ..i:;�.�", y y'.� 1?;?�A.'t -,l E Lt7 a 4.'-�-i'��, . �''-77 ..`ir `�1, ..r,.-.-.-;.�•Lr �.. .s

'I" "p IMP,
-A 1- k"m 21
.d
W
wm
NN
r., gl-
ri MT
V k
4�1
L:, L
�Z7 W., 6
kaq
44
U
PRO
'o "ir
— Ap
­7 0,

1�� • s F !U� ifi rA f � y ` @fir' flr'.G1 f �r i i�F �—F 1711 0
tow
Yr � - {{i }���,�4K#�' J s ��� sti rGq}}�f��• �' r" In � I ,�� ' ri�H' Y�J ha?
1141�
I !r 1 L a 3
+� r� y45t1�iQ
I{'�u �� 3� { jh rtr"rF1j3j r d�j r, j \ J •I••. r4ii r 4$ryax n uk xYt+s:5fary'�}_
l ,.a ar p � ul , �I �,� � �r i � �. !.- � � ♦ a � �r Srs } ij �1' �' �
tr � 3-ry 03,. � .,I, `f' A!!d. r�� ! ��F'�. � r f � I a _[T� ,.L, ,,,• r' Lr�i Y f i. ,�%� y}�' �.t.�� ..
r 3 "i�l,�•tr�tc r�r1J, �'_r Ir��"5j'�r r�♦i�•4'r �,�-9 '"°� .i�i pi lti�r�. Al� ,ti'' Jr -if rl��- ijYfis �d j ri._ +''��'.
�' ff'+Z �s y r�• y� ����AAA �A fai'�s 7r r.r} f f:r j 'rr � ' v�it*�yS ': � t., i• � 7 � `r )o,+ u'rt,r � �.r �''t `� �� Ph Il- �r �v 'L,. � .r�frar[.Ph 1 'M� I : I I ` •,f'S
��� f iris �iP I I�}"� f ti '� -r �'♦ irs4 }}�+ ti� i y��t ,�` sb�6y;r s r„i� it%I+t{,1 f " _^i' R,j'}�•rry; �YJ,i 7
' y,lY ''� � � i iS � '` ' tiffs `0 •F�'dY. e � .�• , '�w`^`�j '.i- s'il�-�i .. �� � �y47 ry�Jt•.�a��
1 1 1 Y f I f:l� ��i S ,1 Y` -, 'rr r I I r, I ,[ � ■ �I�+r ��f
x 7 qi �,. e ".L• _ f,'fd tLr ,y" �..,]� ,�` ��� X x aY�'ra.d k�}.U�'�
'_'�iS}t '`�e~ L.r¢ a lt+} ` '° 'U''�r•d ; 1 -x �.Y', �}+ k�• - - `' 25•
.�i:'4 `••�•}�
�_r + $r � �S;' � 41 1S ��r• i $�t i .{ ��:�*'..+ ya �!�'!� {��`t�a'] < b'^7d .fir �., ,I•Ir���='A�,�..,, ,y,
�r�'� � -*ryr y } '`'%.R"�y,�t u v. r �ry'7x.�1ik � {' I * r F� b r sl ♦ �„ i rX� ��,.+�p � r y ',� ��,F.f x �y _�'�!
,���i�, •r, °4I� ,-,:p�,� dr. �,; rx. d.�.w ,h.'�; `,., ': r , fir' r `'� ��.��1y, � I� �.?Y � +,:. �• �.' wl I
4,r�;�a>�-'! �ict %'. :'�cr F. �dv6 y�;•..;�'
SS rr=, !d r v 5 i' r {7 [ e.-:'`. 1 �i ? �j� y M. h 1+,• sc
' } 'SE"• r '- �,Tr 4 �f ~�
'� -� "i rit gut � c c •�Y � y 5 _;'.1,•�•�<a } n .� N
-•�L �`` 1 - .a`'.�gt•;+I � }�. '+ ,;.��� y�r'�y �`„�"�l �.
V-I�`t ,y + r .srJ� P I - f.; rt .: x"i"> �-{ ',C }:tif. ■�.,; e?�•,��F f:� r f.
� 'fl •��, j '�rfl w�rw � rs. .r' rt�♦k�� - �. IS I '7a� - � iJ �, ,., 1��1r r �i� ta� i 5 �'``-��t t' r.'YJ
y t4s'�4 rrr� �' i%� 1 �.�n �' �` r�.!s�� �t r �.� � } �i !i f t ,i5� �'• � \�,�t., v $ w,j' s ' •��y�.i i.'�,a. ' ri.� �;{
:A• } 11 y„ fv, r ,y rx 'y i � 'i yt, + f i, s ,�;� M rr 1E , {+I r? � �R' � ;�� I .
� r f � �: u i... ; ri � � ' - ar s. \ 1 .�',r� 1 �'�•+ 4 x I M x �K
_ r r � � 1, . , r P ,.y j' - I_ [[!) ' �;� ♦ +�- , ,? "!jj , ' . 1 t ".Y.r�'I _ r } lDt! � �-}
1 C\ I .r. '! ;• ,� 1� ;yu' �,� � i _ v Lp ♦'� � � •!� � � y y`. t-'_'_ __' •�Y�'�' f �•S 5-���:� ' ,4�K{�� >,{� xr�j. Y+c
hG^,�j iff=• r'ti. �^'�,,`rr..t�`�„�^x,`�s� V � �^.. r�� tl' }'lk5"� .U.;v'y'� w': r+i3',s',}�� i': I •� `rY�,�}�? � 3 �Ai. ��'``+'y+N�'r ..i"s��%;��'•'r.
u;S rris i:i' � ,� ys �d+y:° �����r! 4f f1�o, 1•i �� Gt�} � 1,'tt�hY" f y �� x.�.,�f '��r�' :.n'•`1�xi+'
,p .l "; �l rir�l7,'sl�`'Yr xkj� 'qs � r .+�, + � +�'•.•11 � -� � ,� x7 i� i;q A� � �„ ly "hj
.,�sr]q'� _ �' t� r � fir.. 9 r.a .f� r+ r ^ '[i� •, w{�kG?� • :.5: a'3a'{ � r t 'Sb a.� .f [ � �,, �fyj ��� .� tr _ r i
�I �� at��x�ti�-Y � r ��,yft �� .� �ty '..ti..r?:� a 7Y ,1�'� `[Zi YvIY -}�' S � •t; .''- A�.r fii �{,a ,Y, -_:.
.i r,y�•��, e� r,I' r • ' A" P �l" `S .It ' r c r - ! ,, , y 1 tom'"- � ,yt,. �] I sir^.
I r i li'S��e.�5'r ` ,`g3 7`. x� a'r YS,��t1" -k 'fur ,� Y �! ti i• ri s,� �`w>�� "� .� 7iOf, ,•.r.'+-
T :*"�, wc-1 rt� � x�t f •[�I { y,��r� Y.,,g:5 � . r �''',^ ; `� ::�'r �it° •"��r;'T 6 s�!�� ryt }a` Y; S { ' 1�;,; L��`,.t�•r`.:.,
�`,�ay,� ,a c 7,t.. _ •r'r R t4 alr� ,a s 'sN�a �f � ti � j• + �. �r � { i S7� �k,s}r+,,� t ,y � �,y,,. k !� �c ,-}�,3�r -
;��° y' ra Ir} ';,,1'.«'� �"w.l�..'�_v jw .��'t�-i� y rv��'�° � ! � ��;. �+af �-,�*V"'y^��: ..�zr I�yJ��.� JIB r_�i�� i�� •1Kv��� {, yrskr .
r. �'�'
e � 1�L- s°� P i s r ;,� � � 't �".ti, 'L � 'a �+I,i L c°•� r s' •y_ p. �'�� yN ^}Fi.,;�.
{♦ i 1•.%t^^, .... .yq4 ill f"` ssi'1''.Y.f�f : " �7J I a' 1_'kf •F�! tl ',1Sy;r -) �•7,. W:1
�4. [ .. ♦w �4� � R 4 �, dryW-T,
f�l 5 '�f' ♦Y S 4 %� 3 I���w.�rt^''i �`,..f•._,7
` :r _.

Supporting Documents
Attachment F

RESEARCh .& ANAlyTiCAI
LAbORATORiES, INc.
For: NC DENR DWQ
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd. Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Attn: Melissa Rosebrock
Report of Analysis
4/10/2017
T.a;
NC434 x!
S NC #37701
Client Sample ID:. Koopman Dairy Lab Sample ID: 33067.01,
Site: NC DEQ Collection [late: 4/6/2017 .10:45
Parameter Method Resu iJnits Rea Limit Analyst Analysis DateMme
Fec Coli-MF SM 9222 D-1997 >60000 c01/100 ml 1 LP 4/6/2017 1654
NA = not anolyzed
P.O. Box 473 106 Short Street Kemersvi]Ie. North Carolina 27284 Tef: 336.998-2841 Fax, 336-996-0326 wwwjandalabs.com Page 1
ra co8 basic vId

Division of water Quality
450 W. Hanes Pill Rd, Ste. 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Attention: Melissa Rosebrock/AP
KmTmrwAa. Naih Candkv 27284
11 April 2017
TERMS: NET 30
"PAST DUE INVOICES ACCRUE
INTEREST AT I %% INTEREST PER
MONTH UNTIL PAID
SHOULD COLLECTION BE REQUIRED,
CUSTOMER AGREES TO PAY
ALL EXPENSES INCURRED INCLUDING
ATTORNEY'S FEES"
RE -
Past Ofte 00 473 11 - evB MM 183 Phone 33819W.2841
Rr
Si
T1
3:
T(

REsEARch & AmlyriCA[
LAboMTORIES, INC.
Analytical / Process Consultations
Phone [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
WATER 1 WASTEWATER I mw.
•i7 -. i
r �
•
•
REQUESTED ANALYStS
a
Ir' ffmd
■�■�������ME
■■■����
IMEMENMEMEM
MEN■■
MENOMONEE
ME
■EM
--
IMMOMMENOMMEMEEM
'SAMPLE TEMPERATURE AT RECEIPT -=:t�

AC37440 North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section Laboratory Results
Loc. Descr.:
County: RANDOLPM
Collector. M ROSEBROCK
VlsRID
Region: WSRO
Report To WSRO'
Location ID: KOOEMAMPAIR,F
River Basin CPF01
Collect Date: 04106/2017
Priority COMPLIANCE
Emergency
Collect Time: 1 4�
Sample Matrix: WASTEWATER
COC Yes/No
Sample Depth
Loc. Type: Effluen
Final Report
Sample ID'.
AC37440
PO Number #
Date Received:
0410712017 "
Time Received:
am
Labworks LoginlD
TASCENZ01
Delivery Method
NC Courier
Final Report Date:
4117/17
Report Print Date:
008120117
!f this report is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
Result/ nits Method Analysis
CAS # Analyte Name g—L Qualifier Reference Date validates by
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab 1.9 "C 4r7/17 MSWIFT
MIC
BOD, 5-Day in liquid
2.0
1300
mg1L
SM 5210 B-2001
4A117
ESTAFFORDI
NUT
NH3 as N in liquid
0.02
47
mglL as N
EPA 350.1 REV 2
4111/17
CGREEN
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid
0.02
1.2
mg1L as N
EPA 353.2 REV 2
4/11117
CGREEN
Phosphorus —total as P in liquid
0.02
23
mgtLas P
EPA365.1 REV 2
4110117
CGREEN
Total Neldahl N as N in liquid
0.2
110
mglLas N
EPA351.2 REV 2
4113117
CGREEN
WSS Chemistry Laboratory» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 (919) 7333908
"Not Detected" or "Ll" does not indicate the sample is anafyte free but that the analyte is not detected at or above the PQL.
Page 1 of 1

Y�'b f kl � x � ��t� � � �.', ', 1�1i �f A.- f !1��,v (rFr�f /i t' w "s{ • ! 1 S ` _ . M
h[
^� Ir _ 1. !"Sr :d �� lv0 �s� r}frI •.Ir�ly r• �
�.j /'+'�i�' 7�j � r y' Y.��'y`7{`7,.1 }�� y � / .T�tl .� r.._ �"'• {'C'� a k �,r� � fV�d * }jt �.r:�� �•�
`iF+�,.+• Ill J'cl rp � .. , T l �� � , � r r .. _ T � � , •L jx ". `�
1G�V y f 4}. 4 O,
yl+'+ }�
F +-. .5 } � " w l,y �. '�i, 11 1 • AI �tpp�lr�5�� t�4 .,` �.� r !',�"TM`t x ,
�'G4, i•,, fi;.,ll P� '?=•'" } ��-,:jl,� y�"}'�r� i;�jjJ��I1tt'��f. ` yjp,7 '���1� iY��1 �rr �' i"' ��. ii��Y�`�' �fi1�� l 7 ` �t��{}• •��t'J,• •�i,L , 'I ,r 's, t. it�.�`�frY"s4 �t i'•I
i� �' �r ••i }l�+'�r, %_•f �•i� .ij1 �;57 t11'1' "r'1rFa 9:d�h•r,F{' ,•j'\ �. •r-�,'s;,b��,
A". '} T : �- r w t 1.,, s:� t I-.+Y j + '` - r�gti •� �S R •7 6'- V >r�., ({]�g� 1 i. � 1
'r� yi.?` .�.y,Ja •�'��tfi4�' .f'�rV.l U �t��ll �af� �}V,'[�i«ri ����Sr.�s�. ji
��• r �d,�,�* klF'�'* °, ,� P , � `� 'Y, �" �`'�3 ti. V t � r�-.�'� �,{t i,�il i, i`l, cP 1� .[ J rF} [ titl r ,� f`• ',i
t-s ; '47kM k ti�x� .�' l�,yv � s yy �,!�Y<, ���. } 4, �yy415 s.� , "f i� r�����r�rtl �}�iJ i�� �p 'i k,,♦ wr`�
i 1a i w,r a�'�•.i-r a p�, S"�*i S/ �' I' -� �C��,� �•�;.�kr �`I` : �,�' `� r �'` �+'F a..�_id`. �.
/.i:r.l� �,S,Tr� y :,• }, . � "� r .�•y�',,y %V;-."��,k _ t ti�'tY`' �i;'1� i' ! .
1 •t •r r x� 11 5 � ,:, t �.���'� f t•; .: ti.' � � •�'• yd �t'i' � r
�` `•1'� „��'j�'-``j�,�t1: t;''�Y� +js`+�'.> �:'+i�; ;"�"�' , � '�• ��l�L''�L`s'{ � Y �.
it
i �✓ i [
l '�i� �. � �I � .y�,�� s i t;�•��'}�' Z ,$�yh. , , � .Y�;g gC � l„ ,�s�� k„ LC, is : �•�'s` `�} j�j7 � �� �x}�.c �` .i , .
O yl., rL1 • w , r1 „, Y►. 1 k�,C+I A C "" t , ..Iu •• T }�fI•t _
-41
\I2AHU dM WfJODS�RU ^'�.,,.. _ ''�` �yT•," ►Tii
• ,-�VU�'*5 't.r ;�? RN.wg�r �1,.r+4.•;'ti'� ' .,Y .,
'a �""'iS� J ti,� 4 } h}�';- J x'�S fk� - r r r •• �z :.1:,, a� ., �' r �•: •
v{y.;f �'[ 4� s�, r �y?N*i"'s, „ •w �. �r.I, "��{
Jr yy 'ti $ 1' •�f'i �+ \\.�,,��}, '"t•W\ir A�'?+ter : 7a ? ,,;y. { �r�At r�M ry•!S* ��5,, %x'�--.''� � ,� � ti; r'tivcR•`�s `i. :�,(.
:, �•�yi � L sti vJ�y1S� .�Y?�, e.l� �} S ,;:�{i;�f,` �k�,� •'��� �'���Y,�- � `�`��}y��4t �%�!�!: 1 �•� ; i i� 'hy1�`,�S'C � ," i, { 4 t 2:
M�����, � ti l�yy5 �,p5� r{� � ='�f ft�r+ L -� s 3!�� �4�,��'s :: �. •ihs.'r' p�.�t. . � � �7. �`��'q�. j�' fy9� r;'/ •.�y � •s�,• 1'�
t �s !, r ;;LL J�', 'S• � � r rw i�'C ?4 A y. �y'�n'"•i:sp � '�
7 5F r a !+ +.�1Vf.Ni1 r k. *' �1P a T "• 3���i��� 1,a1p ,r \�k a« Li y1 ..
.�. •�µa.\ ��} •<T: • 1� JS •rKl 1.� �'� Y r'w� 1$h} /iL.�"r "'l ti� a' •R�L::1..z, y i I .�1�
-e ! +t��t'"lit+,'. �� ya t 4^,• ld'Fs�rt s -`4z�.� �. �` .i'�i1t
h�, `�. p /•'a'•rS r ,� •�4 R� �Ste '�..,aij"{"ary � :� ��'�:� •�S�w', ��•'+- •Y �SiS 4,. ���" �- _
�L .:, : vv .I k•v. .�1!y, i• 1�% 1 ♦ V,� r y� d�q{yv�h ,u ik 'r. t- r..� .t .� 1 w'.* '.F•,. ';a
,��;i+{i� , r b t .jeA�j.}y�s], � f' '• Ll. ►y A" .`1�• \ 1'�Ts.r'•.3 �'• - aY �'i'w' t k :. � �r �•. •- .�.iS��
iS .�' Sti{e fara�a#�d":�'t"13v T•e�,'tf.�•r�rk•.MJ
It i `4 ��94r•� ,'r I.S. r •. ice; •�''' ��r' tF! i'° v"7t
+�,tC ti,?•^{" t .r i�y�•,.,,;t n J } 1 ��"y4�i S�''�,�.J� : I �' � i' .?�� �h�'��' •j, fJ� ,� `;i a ': � ,.` '� �`i'�' 3.'.
4 �
�L. I Itf �. �. f•Lr hsYt'i„ si S �^.'?y�. pi�;�l, ,'b'"+ 1 a ?� ti r r fir~ ':'m ,•+•, �,•
"''�}?�y�r � �,C.�1'�7+� �����'a;�!��s�'.»!f .'��,, yYl``.%h �i�'�a�tr "; .ls�l{x'��, ll. }..4 Ik,��... •.� f.y �y ��11' C" 'vi
v�►Y�;,,��j'a.,$:4 � ��,�'ki ' E`"*�� t„,�'1„�R;Ty',";s���N�,Cb„�P,ti _ t k'sI•s �, � w r. � 1 '^$ � a •' •^ �,'„_,'—"`�:..:r��:f,'
'�].k i ,•'fN, sY," . i` * � { I, , ,, If h , v I r,` t +,1,�. t a ♦ �" "'IS t] S -'Ni •I_ t ,'�
.� •a� 'ti ,°,. 3,` � ' � �ro FrPS,$' �,;•..� .3F � 1' �.Y � ,5� 7� ,t�f
.t" 4'[ � �, 1 +•7 �"'` _L/�'�' 'i�'wSs'% h .�+ - .a.. ` �.t i' _ 'r S; i'"7
�i1t1 Y;Ar ��
f
h ?i r• .i w+s- +I �`}� ;e. i f a;. c' , •i-, L • 1,:' L xy �� -ySv +i +'v` {. t t a
., `' F �3 �• -'.. .i5 c ,,,. d ,+•, t,r J" #+' ~j ofSr..s. !� 1 -Y` V
✓ � k r 'F .i` +. `1�1 . (C �•��`; - 1'�"ii�' 1.5 ,'� �d "v !;�; 'r r i`�
WA
}•�4 y�. • `
ti. �_'Z '� !'..%. ;� `3. �' 4� ?i r s ,�`Aq: • ;r� '� r ��,yk5 � '\ f4„ltii,iML ti-w-71i ' Y . ^•�$" �.7.'- ,..�, O � � � t •� ��
,.,.e. �'•,7f-�:`',^�,�"�` •X� ;, � tiP ` "I '.sy�{ �]�r 'M� �',}.}'�Tt a�Y'�, "�� .� } �'�� >. ��'�'A?',4. )1 c _ . .�,�,�,,, ,��!,'���f-'ar'`�'� k!'
k ,L'p•iG 1.. ,.• ;Y�!• `�y,�it,_�� 1�'4'[+�s, .''r,5''r• 1 t "a`t f,.s Z'; .I�*fir•+"_''.%.f•Li.. w
•ys i'L.•f i ti :�• ti i t s41..?.`rr•�..�• ,.n
S.-s., 1, r .,� 7 ,` \ �t �h7'� �•}�. •w ,� 1r ,�,� ,�;� L `} S l ram} `k,��•• �r, ii� rr "s � r
� y�� R `s J,� f4 - i�;� I r• ij: "PL j �' r�y•'�` ,�'f:
4 ti� ,a�J � h v 1 '�'► ku �`Fjt x � �� ��'.,. �s ►y�{`fie ! �t1�}�(X� '.��•l'�,,s 1'� 5.,�`�
w� ,{L�7 , a*I� �"��_ I! � t•4`� '.y �k � rf iljyy`f F-,- '..� . �' a �(],!w"� . .4. • �':,,,,a � J �`�{;'_ � i : ���
r}!_..\ 1�,i'�ti y Si -Sr,+' r t!'ik'M[ y� r 1�`k�R �^ 1 Lk�' \�',� 1 y. '�.7:r &,S�ti+,Vr+r!," t �• ''�1, ,�
fyr n ♦ h , r 71 / } \�•,y1 v h+ 'Jtv ''r,v �^ S `�+ ' rx y ;<' s""�`f•y'tifj,, y •r)
:9•�� °V rl�l � r�'�„S51 W s *. 4. °h. Sk }\•ak r h,l }, LtY' �CrC V ti;.•'ti � �� w.':�.�� k "'gls y
' �� ``+�'}s�s':f�+t. `',,f +", }L� •.� k
`"I� " �I 1_ • r�+,�s` Y�{ °A,, �y�`' j �,
,�.
i t1"t S sd.;, a•�,wS ,4,+'• 1ii�d.�"ed �i',4�r.,�k��1'�r"�i :�,� t. 1�`i.•{ i. �oi�\`,`AIf_ Is. ,y�+:
i{ke >*r' •.,�,�4°"�`;e, •. °o ti.r `\i4. i4 R'^
WS.s QF?tiCA�i•35r'.,� M `;��y i3 i;.4 r + . �� '1 + AN
- � r, � x � . ��., ��;' �,4. �� bib ; �+ "'�y��.hYi•'«. {w.t�a
r,7•'-• k, k t
:� �-, ��a�. r`�j��,kn'�a.•os'S� � < •. k a 'I' � 1"" by 1 .._ ti SI;�y),,�� � >v>• .. �S " .
'� �' �'' t►..: u ?a� �y�`,'* �"r y�7��w- ' e , � �byyy�{� ��•`�1, � y!'.a� �.' _ � Cr �'^' .4
cL' 'a'r1 Fv+`,s•rhh4^f-Y�` '•� ''�.� •r�t�``�'� k"y�',{r'�"'•'SDI n S.` ,y�le'?F���}ySr�l�a'S`� -- '.
N� r�� /.h'L+T't�?�?:Fi2fr'+�'.� � ' *,• .Lai SYC•Y'�Y� �tw�. 't?':i�1.�i,:��.��•. 1y. � '.�V�^'it�':ir'7 1eY��J1 }

Jj
I F44
, Ak
7N. 0
T7
N J
N4�
W-a
Y 0
MIN t
K
t4l
dlF LEI
401
;,k xk
Man
K4
JK

i"M rL71
,O!o
4 x
i'j
S,
7L!Xj;'
_U
V`iok 41' "Y
b
bs
;4j
X.1
l t9
s ry r��T,�P,7 .��;�+� t'•14s'��LL. �°Cr �� �n;���'^'s•'�'i%,�'� ,�i
ul
2 WA
. . . . . . . . . .
"Vk: INK Y.,,yrF il I I
C a
v?. 4
AP
to
3�!v - . ?i
I'.
ly
W,
�t
7T-
4
1
fT
I
ON.
M.4 NIV
Yn
V, 1"N
tlllylv I

Page 1 of I
Randolph Countv. NC
i
p
11.0
1
`\ RANDOM-WOODS-RD_ _
E
e
0
s
REID
73903
OWNER ADDRESS2
PIN
8708114338
OWNER CITY
STATESVILLE
TAXED ACREAGE
3.90
OWNER STATE
NC
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
R2403;S
OWNER ZIP
28625
DEED BOOK & PAGE
002512/00793
LOCATION ADDRESS
3974 OLD RED CROSS RD
PLAT BOOK & PAGE
Not available
LOCATION ZIP
CLIMAX,27233
OWNER
KOOPMAN DAIRIES INC
DATA REFRESHED
6/25/2017
OWNER ADDRESS
204 LOYD RD
t/' \ Disclaimer: This map was compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and other public records Map Scale
+l� and data. Users of this data are hereby notified that the aforementioned public information 1 inch = 667 feet
sources should be consultedfor verification of the information. Randolph County, its 6/28/2017
i� agents and employees make no warranty as to the accuracy of the information on this map.
http://gis.randolphcountync.gov/randolphjs/ 6/28/2017

NC Department of
Environmental Quality
Received
MAY 12 2017
Winston-Salem
al Office
Statesville May 9, 2017
Subject: NOI-2017-DV-0077
Dear Mrs Knight,
In response to your letter the following:
On April V we applied manure to one of our newly acquired and recently cleared fields
which created an alleged run off. The weather forecast for that day was a 65% chance of
0.29 inches of rain for later in the afternoon. We included a screenshot of the forecast for
Liberty. We received more rain than forecasted, according to our records a little less than
0.5 inch. In your letter you refer to NWS records. Those records are either based on
weather in Asheboro or Siler City. This might be the difference in actual rainfall on our
location and NWS records as those cities are about 20 miles from our location. On the 3
days after the 3rd we received less than 0.75 inch according to our records for our
location. In a normal scenario this should not be enough rain to cause any run off. If there
was any minor runoff it was accidental and not our intention.
On 4/8, the first day the field was dried up enough, we used a disk to incorporate the
manure. As we could not enter the field prior to that date we do not believe we violated
permit condition 11.7.
We have submitted all information regarding the fields that were not in our plan yet to
Randy Blackwood, who will add them to our plan.
All fields have been planted in the last few weeks and a permanent vegetated buffer has
been created on the new and recently cleared field.
We have included a completed SLUR-1 form for tract 10730 and manure samples as
requested.
We were doing and will continue doing our best to be in compliance at all times,
Sincerely, Ard and Monique Koopman

MMAMAwottotaicDtMelon. Phone:=.019173IMM Webelta: etwerjcam potRig rena N,. FYIFAM MM,
rrr4 4
�
COwt Adbftw-
'410.5 �farnde4Farm FLtI
}
Waste Report
-aM 1111Y5'G' +
ermpl.a:0410912017
L.InM Ea Flelplul Imormedon
Amcdved 04110i2017 CwWkm:0411412017 Far7n: 76-30
PALS Ik 424688 PALS 0:
Sample bdbnnatlon
hlLMW& and OMw Meal mments
Allfti en (M (cmm) : P (can) K fcmrrr) Ca (aom) W & mi S (amm) Fe (mm) Mn (can) ?n (cant Cu ours) s O&W Ma (cpnt) C (MM) .
Saalpte lD 1
-ToIW N leg 843 .370 -231
88.7 .65.2 4.09 7.02 -2.46 0.74
turn Coat LSD
Aasafadlo+r
TOW KleldWN a40 i..........................................................................
.........---------- --
- DalryUq: Slurry
PH DM (%) SS (f O'6Srtm)
EC (mShm) CCE (%) ALE(1000 901:) QN BD (g►an )
hwrmudc N
ContmartCr:
NHFN 7.288
NO3-N
Qr(rarlfc N ; M form) Cd Nom) Pb (Aom) Al (PPP
So (Pam) As (owN Cr *PW Na (wn) CI aaw
urea 40.2
355
EWMatt or NuOrle>c1s Axagabia for Fling Crap Qb 11000 gal.)
OdMW Ek marpa Qb l 1000 gal.)
Appt)ceE)pn &N~
N P20s K20 Ce MOS Fe Mn Zn
Cu 8 Ab Na Cl Alf Cd Pb Al Se
moadcam
2.80 3.24 8.49 3.09 1.93 0.74 0.46 0.03 0.06
0.02 0.01 2.97 0.34
f orih Carolina
hitxtu I�en; 4 ur,ACrxtrRaf>•+n
RepVQramming of the laboratory4nWmaWnitranaganwW sptem Met makes M report ppaai is beltlq funded
througha' grant ftom the North CamBna Tobeom Trust Fund Commisalon.
Thank you for using agr ommidservices to mmuNe'nuinews and sufeg&k,#d em1> taf 4-dity
New Trader,, Commi simw ojrAgrw dtwv.

Water Resources r
Environmental Quality
April 21, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL No. 7015 0640 0005 8164 0926
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ard Koopman
Koopman Dairies, Inc.
204 Loyd Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Notice of Violation and Notice of Intent to Enforce
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIIVIMERMAN
Director
N0I-2017-DV-0077
Permit Number: AWC760060
Parcel ID# 8707191668, 8708114338, 8708106667, 7798919504 and 878111770
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Koopman:
On April 6, 2017, Melissa Rosebrock and Patrick Mitchell of the Division of Water Resources (Division)
Winston-Salem Regional Office conducted a site inspection of the above referenced properties in
response to complaints alleging excess odor and the runoff of sediment and animal waste. A copy of
the inspection report is attached for your review.
Accordingly, the following observations and violations were noted:
A discharge of cattle waste into Sandy Creek was observed from two different locations of the
application field on the south side of Old Red Cross Road. Sandy Creek is also classified as a WS-ill
(water supply) water within the Cape Fear River Basin. WSRO did not receive notice of the
discharge from anyone with Koopman Dairies, Inc. prior to the Division's discovery of the
discharges on March 6, 2017.
On March 6, 20.17 Division staff sampled the run-off waste just prior to its entry into Sandy Creek
for fecal coliform, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and nutrients. The results are as follows:
Fecal Coliform = >60,000 col/100mL
BOD = 1,300 mg/L
NHs as N = 47 mg/L as N
NO2+NO3 = 1.2 mg/L as N
Total phosphorus = 23.0 mg/L as P
Total Kjeldahl N =110 mg/L as N
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, WinstmSalem, North Carolina 27105
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]

Koopman — NOV/N01
April 21, 2017
Page 2
No discoloration was noted in the surface waters upstream of the recently cleared application
area while the surface water was much darker in color, with more discolored foam, downstream
of the denuded application fields, which suggests the discharge was occurring prior to the April 6,
2017 investigation. The unpermitted discharge of animal waste into surface waters is a violation
of condition I.I. of the Cattle Waste Management System General Permit (Permit).
Condition 11.22. also states that "the Permittee shall consider pending weather conditions in
making the decision to apply waste..." You may recall that the National Weather Service (NWS)
forecast for April 3, 2017 was for rain and thunderstorms in and around the application area.
During phone conversations with the Division, Koopman Dairies, Inc. indicated that they "quit
applying waste when it started to rain." Koopman Dairy records indicate that less than 0.50 inches
of rain fell on April 3, 2017 and less than 0.75 inches on the three days following application. NWS
records confirm that the following weather conditions were recorded in and around the area for
April 3, 2017: "Thunderstorms, heavy rain, rain, light rain, fog" and at least 0.70 inches of rain
between April 3-4, 2017. SLUR-2 records indicate that 59,200 gallons of waste was applied to 55
acres of tract 10730 on April 3, 2017 (1,076 gallons per acre).
Division staff also documented sediment run-off from the newly cleared land. This is most likely
caused by the lack of vegetation on the steep slopes and recent rain events. Some ruts have also
formed in the fields and are a conveyance for sediment and waste.
2. The site inspection and records review also confirms that animal waste was applied to fields not
In the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). Per submitted application records,
waste was applied to tract 10730. This tract is NOT listed in any of the following versions of the
CAWMP: 3/9/2016; 5/7/2010; 4/17/2008; 8/7/2006.
The inspection also documents that animal waste had been applied to the small grain crop in the
fields across the road (north side of Old Red Cross Road) as evidenced by the waste on the stems
and leaves of the plants and slurry equipment tracks in the fields. Records indicate that Randy Joe
Garner owns these fields and that they are NOT listed in the CAWMP. The application of waste
upon areas not included in the CAWMP is a violation of permit condition 11.2.
3. An unusually strong waste odor was detected in and around the application areas. Our
investigation concluded that animal waste was applied March 25-April 3, 2017 to recently cleared
and denuded land in tract 10730 and not tilled -in until 3/8/2017. Failure to incorporate manure
into bare soil within two days after land application, or prior to the next rainfall event, is a
violation of permit condition 11.7.
Required Response:
Accordingly, you are directed to respond in writing within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of this
Notice. Your response should be sent to my attention at the letterhead address and must include
specific plans and timeline for permanently addressing the following:

Koopman — NOV/N01
April 21, 2017
Page 3
1. Immediately establish a vegetative cover for ALL fields in tract 10730 that received animal
waste. You should also repair the ruts that have formed on the denuded land so that future run-
off might be minimized. A permanent vegetated buffer in the area along the stream should be
created to help prevent further run-off of sediment and manure during rain events.
2. Receiving fields located in the parcels listed above must be approved and added to the CAWMP
prior to ANY future waste application events. If these fields are not deemed suitable for waste
application, then no animal additional waste may be applied.
3. Application records submitted to the WSRO for tract 10730 did not include the required "weather
code." A completed SLUR-1 form, which includes the weather code, should therefore be
submitted to the Winston-Salem Regional Office. We request that you submit application records
for those fields that received waste on the north side of Red Cross Road as well. Please note that
the 12/18/2016 waste analysis used to complete the submitted SLUR-2 form was not conducted
within sixty days of application. Thus, a new waste analysis should be obtained as soon as
possible.
This Office is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement to the Director of the Division
of Water Resources regarding these issues and any future/continued violations that may be
encountered. This office requires that the violations, as detailed above, be abated immediately and
properly resolved. Pursuant to G.S.143-215.6A, these violations and any future violations are
subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to a maximum of $25,000.00 per day for each violation.
Your above -mentioned response to this correspondence, the degree and extent of harm to the
environment and the duration and gravity of the violation(s) will be considered in any civil penalty
assessment process that may occur.
Please contact Melissa Rosebrock (336-776-9699) or me (336-776-9696) if you have questions
concerning this Notice.
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources,'NCDEQ— WSRO
Attachment
cc: WSRO File Copy
NCDEQ DWR-Animal Waste Feeding Operations
Randolph County NRCS and Soil and Water Conservation District (via emails)

N01: aolr7-IOv-0077
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. A Signature
■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑ Agent
so that we can return the card to you. U Addressee
■ Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece, B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Datof Delivery
or on the front if space permits. M. �[1 �7rY Yn -1 . f
1..Ar sole Addressed to:
Mr. Ard Koopman
Koopman Dairies, Inc.
1204 Loyd Road j
Statesville, NC 28625 i
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1 T-�Fa YeE
If YES, enter delivery address below: . ❑ No
I! 11illl! Iill III! I I I! li I II IIII II lli! III! II I III 3. Service Type ❑ Prlatity Mall Express®
© Adult signature ❑ Registered Mall*-
❑ Adult Signature Restdcted Dellvary ❑ Registered Mall Rastrlotet
9590 9403 0921 523 9827 90 rc rntinad MMee, 2Restricted DeUmy ❑ IDoIhre R lfor
❑ Collect on Delivery
--- -- - --.- n rAWA an Delivery Restricted Dellvery ° Signature Connnnatlon*M
7 015 0640 0005 8164 0926 ° Restrl�cteed�Dal Y� lion
u Restricted Delivery
I —tnver auul
Ps; Form 3811, July 2016 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 �� JF% .. Domestic Return Receipt

U First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
i
Permit No. G-10
9590 9403 01 223 9627 90
United States • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4® in this box*
Postal Service
NC Departm— n,f - -
Environmental ` @'WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS SECTION
ReceiV, ,' N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
MAY 0 b 20 :r 450 WEST HANES MILL ROAD, SUITE 300
WINSTOW SALEM, NC 27105-7407
Winston-5aic fn
Regional Office
11111,1111I h,111111)1111111l1fjfl1ltff)oi►rl11Jf111111f1111111

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 760060 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC760060 ❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Complaint
Date of Visit: 04/06/2017 EntryTime: 10:15 am Exit Time
Farm Name: Koopman Dairies Inc
Owner: Koopman Dairies Inc
Mailing Address:
Physical Address
Facility Status:
County: Randolph Region: Winston-Salem
12:00 pm Incident 9
Owner Email:
Phone:
204 Lloyd Rd Statesville NC 28625
4105 Meredall Farm Rd Liberty NC 27298
❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
704-876-4909
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 51' 22" Longitude: 79° 38' 27"
Farm address: 4718 Ramseur- Julian Road, Liberty, NCUS Hwy 421 south from GSO. Right onto Old Liberty Rd. Right onto
Ramseur -Julian Rd. Farm is on daht.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Ard Koopman Operator Certification Number. 997080
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ard Koopman Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Ard Koopman Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa sebrodc Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secon71napector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
1. Observed animal waste flowing from application fields into Sandy Creek (Water Supply III, Cape Fear River Basin). WSRO-DWR
sampled the run-off waste, just prior to its entry Into Sandy Creek, for fecal coliform, biochemical oxygen demand (SOD), and
nutrients. The fecal colifonn result= >60,000 col/100mL.
2. Site conditions: Temperature=56 degrees F; very windy; partly sunny tumer cloudier and colder, very strong waste odor on
areas nearest Old Red Cross Road. Dead worms were observed in puddles of waste in the field. Puddles were very dark in color.
Application tracks from slurry equipment were noted in the fields. Waste had been applied to small grain on fields across the
road. Stream is 10-15 feet wide. Stream water was much darker in color, with more discolored foam, downstream of the denuded
application fields, which suggests discharge had been occurring prior to our arrival today. No discoloration noted in the stream
and tributary upstream of the recently cleared land that had received animal waste.
3. Observed sediment run-off from newly cleared land caused by the lack of vegetation on the steep slopes and the heavy rains on
4/2/2017 and 41512017. Some gullies have also formed and are a conveyance for sediment and waste.
11. Waste was applied to land not in the CAWMP. Regardless, the permit requires that waste be tilled -in within 2 days of
application which began 3/2512017 and ended 41312017. Waste was not tilled -in until 41812017.
14. Some of the acreage within the unpermitted tract/fields had an established small grain crop. Waste was observed on the
stems and leaves of the small grain plants.
15. Need to immediately establish a vegetative cover for ALL fields that received animal waste. Many acres are completely
denuded of vegetation.
21. The application records received by the WSRO for tract 10730 did not include documentation of 120 minute inspections. This
will need to be submitted to the regional office.
29. The waste odor eminating from application tract #10730 was stronger than is typical, possibly due to the large amount of
acreage receiving waste in a short period of time.
30. The alleged discharge was reported by a complainant and investigated while the OIClowner was out of town. WSRO did not
receive notice of the discharge from anyone with Koopman Dairies, Inc. prior to our visit on 41612017.
32. Per OICIOwner's records, waste was applied to tract 10730. This tract is NOT listed in any of the following versions of the
waste plan: 31912016; 5/712010; 411712008; U712006. Tech specialist confirmed that the recently cleared application tract
(#10730), which received the waste, is not in the waste plan. However, Koopman Dairies, Inc. does own this land. Fields receiving
animal waste, located across the road, are owned by Randy Joe Garner.
33. Spoke to Mr. Koopman about odor complaint on 4/3/2017 while he was traveling out of town. He stated that only a half -inch of
rain had been predicted for 0410312017. Waste was applied by Mr. Koopman and his certified operators, however, Mr. Koopman
stated that they quit applying when it started to rain. Left message on 4/5/2017 for Mr. Eric Isley, farm manager, stating that we had
now received another call regarding the run-off of manure from the unvegetated application fields. The WSRO did not receive a
return call from Mr. Isley. WSRO spoke to Mr. Koopman again on 04107/2017. OwnerlOIC said he was "trying to apply waste to stay
ahead of the game" with regards to the weather and the limited opportunities available to apply waste and plant corn in the spring.
34. WSRO may need to follow-up as necessary to ensure compliance
page: 2

Permit: AVVC760060 Owner- Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number. 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotlons
Cattle
FqCattle -Milk Cow 5,000
Total Design Capacity: 5,000
Total SSLW: 7,000,000
Waste Structures Observed
Disignated
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond
04
18.00
96.00
Waste Pond
LARGE WSP #3
28.00
Waste Pond
LOWER STAGE #2
24.00
Waste Pond
UPPER STAGE #1
12.00
page: 3

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
MCIEDD
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
Other
[�
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
[]
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
M
❑ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
16-20 gal
min. during t45
hr inspection, more prior to
that.
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
M❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
Cl
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑
❑ .
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑M
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yee No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10°/a/10 lbs,?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
E]
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number. 760060
inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste ADMIcatlon
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Small Grain (Wheal,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 2
No Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑0
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes , Nq Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
110 ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Records and Documents Yee No Na No
Stocking? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ N ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yea No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
110
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
0111111
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
0
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tie drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
n
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑ ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
M.
❑ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
E
❑ ❑
❑
page: 6

Rosebrock, Melissa
From: Monique Koopman <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 8:35 AM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa
Subject: Re: Requirements as a result of the discharge
Hi Melissa,
I faxed a copy of the letter to the fax number you gave me the other day. A hard copy is in the mail. Thanks for
reminding us!
Monique Koopman
From: Rosebrock, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:18:51 AM
To: Ard Koopman
Subject: Requirements as a result of the discharge
Ard (and Monique),
As you know, I observed the discharge of waste from the fields off Old Red Cross Road. When there is a discharge,
there are certain requirements that must then be met. If you have not already done so, let me remind you to
about the following permit conditions:
III. 9. and 111.13 — If/when you have knowledge of a discharge you must notify our office within 24 hours. I
observed the discharge before anyone from the dairy but you should still send a written report to our office with
answers to 111.9. a-f.
111.13. page 10 — A written report must be sent to our office addressing the requirements in the permit (page 10,
middle of the page). This was due within 5 days but you should still send that to us. It is very similar to the above
report. Note that'T" requires that a sample be taken of the waste and analyzed for the parameters listed. This is
different to your normal waste analysis. The closest lab is probably Research and Analytical Labs in Kernersville.
The fecal coliform bacteria sample has a short hold time and a special bottle you get from the lab. The nutrients
require a special acid preservative. Ask the lab about that. Tell them you have had an animal waste discharge and
read paragraph "f" for them and ask them what to do from there. This was to have been completed within 72
hours but should still be completed and submitted -to us within 30 days.
Let me know if you have questions.
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
melissa. rosebrock&,ncdenr.gov
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300

`� `� 1�nopman Qairies, Inc 7048702064 p•
Statesville April 11, 2017
Dear Mrs. Rosebrock,
In response to your visit on April 61h the following:
On or about April 3" 1 we received notice from an alleged run off From one of our fields. If
there was any run off we believe it was extremely minor in quantity. According to our
records we had less than 0.5 inch of rain on 4/3 and less 0.75 on the 3 days after, in a
normal scenario this should not be enough rain to Cause any run off. if there was any
minor runoff it was accidental and not our intention.
To be on the safe side we used a disk in the field on 3/8, this was the first day that we
could enter the Field after the rain ended.
All waste samples are being processed by the lab in Raleigh and as soon as results are In
we will forward them to you.
We apologize If we did have minor run off. We do our best to avoid situations like this as
our prior records show. VVe hope you take this into consideration,
Sincerely,
po mann ines Inc
q
By Monique Koopman

NC Department of
Environmental Quality
Received
APR 1.7 2017
Statesville April 11, 2017
Winston-Salem
Dear Mrs. Rosebrock, Regional Office
In response to your visit on April 6th the following:
On or about April 3`d we received notice from an alleged run off from one of our fields. If
there was any run off we believe it was extremely minor in quantity. According to our
records we had less than 0.5 inch of rain on 4/3 and less 0.75 on the 3 days after. In a
normal scenario this should not be enough rain to cause any run off. If there was any
minor runoff it was accidental and not our intention. +
To be on the safe side we used a disk in the field on 3/8, this was the first day that we
could enter the field after the rain ended.
All waste samples are being processed by the lab in Raleigh and as soon as results are in
we will forward them to you
We apologize if we did have minor run off. We do our best to avoid situations like this as
our prior records show. We hope you take this into consideration,
Sincerely,
Koopman Dairies, Inc
By Monique Koopman

Rosebrock, Melissa
From: Monique Koopman <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 5:01 PM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa
Subject: RE: Fwd: Koopman Complaint
Ok thanks, waste reports should be in your fax.
Enjoy your night,
Monique
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid
On Apr 10, 2017 4:58 PM, "Rosebrock, Melissa" <[e-mail]> wrote:
Monique, here's the number: 336.776.9797
Thank youl
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
melissa. rosebrock{g-ncdenr.aov
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
INCNothing Compares
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Monique Koopman [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 3:35 PM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Koopman Complaint
Hi Melissa,
Do you have a fax number?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid
On Apr 4, 2017 2:17 PM, "Rosebrock, Melissa" <melissa.rosebrock ncdenr. av> wrote:
It appears that you may have applied animal waste onto fields not in the waste plan.
i

�entram my Verizon Wireless AG LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: "Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC"
Date:04/04/2017 9:08 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Rosebrock, Melissa"
Subject: RE: Koopman Complaint
They're not part of the latest (3/16/16) plan that I have.
From: Rosebrock, MelissafmaiIto: melissa.rosebrockancdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 5:23 PM
To: Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC <Randy.Blackwood(aanc.usda.gov>
Cc: Randy Freeman <Randy. Freemannrandolphcountync.gov>
Subject: Koopman Complaint
Randy,
Got a complaint today, mostly about odor, regarding land application activities off Old Red Cross Road, Caller
was also concerned about runoff.
Question: Are these parcels in his waste plan? Ard says the fields at the front of the property (near road?) are in the
plan, but he's not sure about the rest, There are about 110 total acres and he says he has cleared about 2/3 of it.
Complainant says he has applied waste on all the cleared land.
Per GIS, the following parcels are owed by Koopman Dairies, Inc., just need to know if they are in his waste plan.
Thank youth
PIN 8707191668
PIN 8708114338
PIN 8708106667
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist

NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
[e-mail]
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
INI 'C'11-
Nothing Compares --%-.-
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any
unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the
law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. if you believe you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.

Property Summary - RANDOLPH County Real Property Data
Page 1 of 2
Tax Department'User Guide
Property Summary
Data last updated on: 8/28/2016 Ownership current as of: 8/25/2016
_ Search Results New Search
REID 0083106 PIN # 8716176239 000
Location Address Property Description
4106 MEREDELL FARM RD Lot * BARRY KENT & PENNY WAUGH JOHNSON•TR2 5 +TR
Parcel I aLLLUjagE
10utbuildin s Land
I Deeds I otes
Owner's Mailing Address
ales
I hotos Tax Bill k1 a
Property Location Address
Property Owner:
KOOPMAN DAIRIES INC
204 LOYD OR
4106 MEREDELL FARM RD
STATESVILLE NC 28625
Administrative Data
Transfer Information
Property Value
Old Map#
8716.00
Deed Date
12/20/2013
Total Appraised Land
$1,300,010
VCS
3440
Deed Book
002368
Value
Township
LIBERTY
Deed Page
01364
Total Appraised
$169,936
Planning
Revenue Stamps
0.00
Building Value
Jurisdiction
RANDOLPH
Package Sale Date
ra
Total Appraised
407 010
'
City
Package Sale Price
Outbuilding Value
Fire District
JULIAN
Land Sale Date
Spec District 1
Land Sale Price
Total Appraised Value
$1,876,956
Spec District 2
Land Class
SINGLE FAMILY
Improvement Summary
Elderly Exclusion
History Parcel
RESIDENCE
Total Buildings
5
Other Exemptions
Number 1
Total Units
0
History Parcel
Total Heated Area
6,172
Use Value Deferred
Number 2
Historic Value Deferred
Acreage
439
Total Deferred Value
Permit Date
Permit #
Total Assessed Value
$1,876,956
http://txpwa.co_randolph.nc.uslpubliewebaccesseamalPropertySummary.aspx?PIN=87l 6176239 5/22/2017

_-
ru12. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Total Miles
Plate f 7PP_%o9 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Rate Per Mite $0.49
Vehicle# 12SW2 MOTOR FLEET TRAVEL LOG Mileage Chae
Vehk2e Model 110urarvo Minimum Amount
Next Oil Chmige Due I For Porrnenently Assigned Vehicles Total Amount
Agarwy
DivisiordSectlon
Fund
RCC r—Proo
DePM Oft. No.
DEQ -itOWR-water
Quality Regional
-Company
1602 1690
69D1
4300
individual Responsible for Vehicle
roval of or SupendW
Vehicle No.
or Month of
Sherri Knight
2SM72
Wrij
TRIP DATES
OFFICIAL TRAVEL
Pu Trt "
Division
Center
Print Name Above line
1p Trip
�8
Fuel Type—
Full City
(Pa )
tilII rE
Leave
ReturnFrom
To
Div Coda It
dtilererd
SI n your nams"
Out
I In
Miles
AU.J[c
�W
2-03
U1S 0GtM
XX
VA�cle4-ho
dw
► o
1/S �
� �
f i
I f I
5V
=�Ix
s0L
L
v
10
I`
4
WOO
r
C
�.�
n'3
S4
ficl
_q
�[ 1
W stia
Wq
�8'�
15,E
2S
m0
Z
No. orrrlps
No. of TrI
No. or Kcal rrl
Odometer Read s:l
oeprmg Of
�h
�/
O S
Efil (I
MoieQr
SS
• By signing out a vehicle, the user.
1. Shall ensure that your HR Office has on file a current, valid, appropriate NCDL, and
2. Attests the above license does not have In excess of S points for moving violation In last 3 yrs or drugfalcohol convicttan in test 5 yrs.
Failure to provide the above information may result In disciplinary action up to and Including dismissal.
Purpose of Trip., C - Complaint E - EnforeementlLegal
F- Field trips 1- Inspection/Sits Visits
M - Meating/Training P - Permitting
S - Sampling T - Technical
O - Other (Please specify in box)
Fuel Types. 135 - Biopiesel, 5% B20 - BloDlesel, 20%
t_ D — Dlasel, regular E10 - Ethanol, 10%
E85 - Ethanol, 85% G87 - Gasoline, unleaded
G89 - Gasoline, unleaded 093 - Gasoline, unleaded
O -Other (Please specify in box)
DENR 0Cs2 rev. 12-28-09

1I-0
FlF121 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Total Mlles
Plate # PP-%W DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Raft Per Mile
Vehicle 250572 MOTOR FLEET TRAVEL LOG Mileage c
Vehicle Model Durango Minimum Amount
Next Oil Change Due For Pennanently Assigned Vehicles Total Amount
$0.49
=
Agency
DMieionfSection
Com n Fund I RCC
Prcg
DepU Off. No.
DEQ
DWR-Water Quality Regional Operations
1602 1690 1 6901
4300
Individual Rea Able for Vehicle
RAAPP.oy.11l of Ag@ncy H or Supervisor
Vehicle No.
For Month of
Sheri "I
2WS72
TRIP DATES
OFFICIAL TRAVEL
Pu otTrl
Division
Div Code it
d'dferard
Center
Print Name Above line
Pre-Tdv
Inspedion
Complete
Fuel Type"}
fuel QtY
MILEAGE
Leave
Return
j From
To
Sign your name"
Out
in
Mites
`�a
s
(aqL->
ft.V-0f
Zip
��
�L
C
No. of Trips
No. of Trip Da
No. of Local TM
Odometer Readi s:;
t1apning
MonlhOf
? n� CQ O
End 9
North:
By signing out a vehicle, the user.
t. Shall ensure that your HR Offire has on file a current, valid, appropriate NCDL, and
2. Attests the above license does not have In excess of 6 points for moving violation In last 3 yrs or druglalcohol conviction in last 5 yns.
Failure to provide the above Irrformatlnn may result In disciplinary action up to and Including dismissal.
Non- CDL Pro -kip Inspection Checklist
Safety! Emergency Equipment available Brakes —good pedal pressure
Hom operational Tires — inflated and with adequate tread
Tail Lights operational Head Lights — High and Low Beam operational
Turn Signals operational Emergency Flashers operational parking lights operational
Brake lights operational Windshield Wipers operational and washer fluid In reservoir
No visibia fluid leak Mirrors — adjusted pmEqtt
DENR 0052
Purpose of Trip: C - Complaint
F- Field trips
M - MeatinglTreining
S - Sampling
O - Other (Please specify in box)
Fuel Types: 135 - Bloplesel, 5%
D — Diesel, regular
E65 - Ethanol, 95%
G88 - Gasoline, unleaded
O - Other (Please specify In box)
E - EntoreementfLegal
I - InspecdonlSito Visits
P - Permitting
T - Technical
820 - BlaDleasl, 20%
E10 - Ethanol, 10%
G87 - Gasoline, unleaded
093 - Gasoline, unleaded
rev. 12-28-09

Water Quality Monitoring Field Meter Calibration Sheet
Sampling Loca
Meter Model:
Meter / Sondi
Date
Time
Initials
yy/mm/dd
24hr hh:mm
Pre -Sampling Calibration
i O'f 0 41
S�
Post -Sampling Check
Miscellaneous (Does not app to Y51 or Accumet Meters)
ery level (V)
Stirrer Working?
Pre -Sampling Calibration
Y/N
Post -Sampling Check
Y / N
Battery Ranges = Surveyor: Internal - 7.2 - 7.SV, Ext al - 11- 13V; Quanta N - R.SV
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1)
Barometer Calibration (mmHg)
'Y51 Pro Plus Meters Only
Initial
Calibrated
Reading
Value
j
,/]al
Initial %
Barometric
D.O. Table
Initial Meter
Calibrated Meter
Calibrated %
Temp. °C
Saturation
Pressure
Altitude (ft.)
value
Reading (mg/1)
Reading (mg/I)
Saturation
(mmHg)
Pre -Sampling Calibration
; 1
,
7�
Post -Sampling Check
P g
y it l I4 I,
��li� ' N�a
i
G �II
41� 1 4
4 k
III
I
i' I I
I�i�1�1
jIy
l'l �h
1, 11,
l ljjjl
I
1_,;Ill llllll 111{€,-all iI
yI �l fll
I,, ill'! 111 IIII II{�l.1I44
I
M d 41 Il ,II Mid
[_II.I::
ii -II€;l 'l 1 l
Il lull lull
141i l' i
I I N3 l I4 lilt ill i t
within ± 0.S ? Y/N
11`�jI Il
ll
IIII
I;II'I
Specific Conductance
Pre -Sampling Calibration
Post -Sampling Check
6/cm at 25°C)
Dry Airy2
Zero (0)
initial Meter Calibrated"
Reading I Meter Readir
Within ± 2?
tt #: a TTq
Conductivity Standard
Value:
Initial Meter Calibrated°
Reading Metter Readiin
Within ± 10%?
Y/N
#:
bration Check
Initial Meter
Reading
Within ±10%?
Y/N
NOTES: Quanta reads in m5/cm; move decimal 3 places to the right for pS/em.
`Dry Air CALIBRATIONS are conducted for 4a and M55 Hydrolabs only.
'Dry Air CHECKS (confirmation of zero in dry air) are conducted for YSI 85, Y51 6920, YSI Pro Plus & Quanta meters.
3Conductivity standards are used to CHECK the YSI 85 meter and to CALIBRATE all Hydrolab meters and the YSI 6920 8l
YSI Pro Plus
4Does not apply to Dry Air CHECKS or Conductivity Standard CHECKS (leave blank).
off [SUl I Lot #-. 2fobS1) W 4 lLot#: -2LO o g1
Buffer #1
Buffeg,
Confirmation
7.0
4.0 / 0.0
Buffer
_
Buffer Temp: a,a .
Buffer Temp: �a `
Slope Efficiency'
7.0
Initial Meter
Calibrated Meter
Initial Meter
Calibrated Meter
Meter Reading
!leading
Reading
Reading
Reading
Pre -Sampling Calibration
7, Q 6
7, p�
V. 2
�"
T O/
Check
`iT.
Within+0.1?
lil1�il3l'l
l ' �`i''`i
�IIlllIlIk
l llllyylh
Nil!
lllllillllllf'rliii�``l��j
llllllll llll!
11lll�liill
Y/NPost-Sampling
�li
Within±0.2?l
Illi 4Ij
Within + 02?
�Illl
Y/N
lilililj4`,�,i'.�j:414��1.l.l;klil�ik
.
Y/N
Ni
llI;III:.:,;.lililil.fllll.!IIr,:
-Slope efficiency applies to Accumet meters only tones not apply to Hyorolatl or -fw meters 1.
Comments:
Kann nriuinal fnr S vpare 7/15/2016, 1:38 PM DWR Pld Mtf Cal Sht V20160708.xlsx

Temp.
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)
(deg Q
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
1 748
749
750
751
752
753
18.8
9.01
9.03
9.04
9.05
9.06
9.08
9.09
9.10
9.11
9.13
9.14
9.15
9.16
9.18
9.19
9.20
9.21
9.23
18.9
9.00
9.01
9.02
9.03
9.05
9.06
9.07
9.08
9.10
9.1-1
9.12
9.13
9.15
9.16
9.17
9.18
9.20
9.21
19.0
8.98
8.99
9.00
9.01
9.03
9.04
9.05
9.06
9.08
9.09
9.10
9.11
9.13
9.14
9.15
9.16
9.18
9.19
19.1
8.96
8.97
8.98
9.00
9.01
9.02
9.03
9.05
9.06
9.07
9.08
' 9.10
9.11
9.12
9.13
9.15
9.16
9.17
19.2
8.94
8.95
8.97
8.98
8.99
9.00
9.02
9.03
9.04
9.05
9.07
9.08
9.09
9.10
9.11
9.13
9.14
9.15
19.3
8.92
8.94
8.95
8.96
8.97
8.98
9.00
9.01
9.02
9.03
9.05
9.06
9.07
9.08
9.10
9.11
9.12
9.13
19.4
8.90
8.92
8.93
8.94
8.95
8.97
8.98
8.99
9.00
9.02
9.03
9.04
9.05
9.07
9.08
9.09
9.10
9.12
19.5
8.89
8.90
8.91
8.92
8.94
8.95
8.96
8.97
8.99
9.00
9.01
9.02
9.04
9.05
9.06
9.07
9.08
9.10
19.6
8.87
8.88
8.89
8.91
8.92
8.93
8.94
8.96
8.97
8.98
8.99
9.00
9.02
9.03
9.04
9.05
9.07
9.08
19.7
8.85
8.86
8.88
8.89
8.90
8.91
8.93
8.94
8.95
8.96
8.97
8.99
9.00
9.01
9.02
9.04
9.05
9.06
19.8
8.83
8.85
8.86
8.87
8.88
8.90
8.91
8.92
8.93
8.94
8.96
8.97
8.98
8.99
9.01
9.02
9.03
9.04
19.9
8.82
8.83
8.84
8.85
8.87
8.88
8.89
1 8.90
8.91
1 8.93
8.94
8.95
8.96
8.98
8.99
9.00
9.01
9.02
20.0
8.80
8.81
8.82
8.84
8.85
8.86
8.87
8.88
8.90
8.91
8.92
8.93
8.95
8.96
8.97
8.98
8.99
9.01
20.1
8.78
8.79
8.81
8.82
8.83
8.84
8.85
8.87
8.88
8.89
8.90
8.92
8.93
8.94
8.95
8.96
8.98
8.99
20.2
8.76
8.78
8.79
8.80
8.81
8.82
8.84
8.85
8.86
8.87
8.89
8.90
8.91
8.92
8.93
8.95
8.96
8.97
20.3
8.75
8.76
8.77
8.78
8.80
8.81
8.82
8.83
8.84
8.86
8.87
8.88
8.89
8.90
8.92
8.93
8.94
8.95
20.4 11
8.73
8.74
8.75
8.77
8.78
8.79
8.80
8.81
8.83
8.84
8.85
8.86
8.87
8.89
8.90
8.91
8.92
8.94
20.5
8.71
8.72
8.74
8.75
8.76
8.77
8.78
8.80
8.81
8.82
8.83
8.85
8.86
8.87
8.88
8.89
8.91
8.92
20.6
8.69
8.71
8.72
8.73
8.74
8.76
8.77
8.78
8.79
8.80
8.82
8.83
8.84
8.85
8.86
8.88
8.89
8.90
20.7
8.68
8.69
8.70
8.71
8.73
8.74
8.75
8.76
8.77
8.79
8.80
8.81
8.82
8.83
8.85
8.86
8.87
8.88
20.8
8.66
8.67
8.68
8.70
8.71
8.72
8.73
8.74
8.76
8.77
8.78
8.79
8.81
8.82
8.83
8.84
8.85
8.87
20.9
8.64
8.66
8.67
8.68
8.69
8.70
8.72
8.73
8.74
8.75
8.76
8.78
8.79
8.80
8.81
8.82
8.84
8.85
21.0
8.63
8.64
8.65
8.66
8.67
8.69
8.70
8.71
8.72
8.73
8.75
8.76
8.77
8.78
8.79
8.81
8.82
8.83
21.1
8.61
8.62
8.63
8.65
8.66
8.67
8.68
8.69
8.71
'8.72
8.73
8.74
8.75
8.77
8.78
8.79
8.80
8.81
21.2
8.59
8.60
8.62
8.63
8.64
8.65
8.66
8.6.8,
8.69
8.70
8.71
8.72
8.74
8.75
8.76
8.77
8.78
8.80
21.3
8.58
8.59
8.60
8.61
8.62
8.64
8.65
8.66
8.67
8.68
8.70
8.71
8.72
8.73
8.74
8.76
8.77
8.78
21.4 "
8.56
8.57
8.58
8.60
8.61
8.62
8.63
8.64
8.65
8.67
8.68
8.69
8.70
8.71
8.73
8.74
8.75
8.76
21.5
8.54
8.55
8.57
8.58
8.59
8.60
8.61
8.63
8.64
8.65
8.66
8.67
8.69
8.70
8.71
8.72
8.73
8.75
21.6
8.53
8.54
'8.55
8.56
8.57
8.59
8.60
8.61
8.62
8.63
8.65
8.66
8.67
8.68
8.69
8.70
8.72
8.73
21.7
8.51
8.52
8.53
8.55
8.56
8.57
8.58
8.59
8.60
8.62
8.63
8.64
8.65
8.66
8.68
8.69
8.70
8.71
21.8
8.49
8.51
8.52
8.53
8.54
8.55
8.56
8.58
8.59
8.60
8.61
8.62
8.64
8.65
8.66
8.67
8.68
8.69-
21.9
8.48
8.49
8.50
8.51
8.52
8.54
8.55
8.56
8.57
8.58
8.60
8.61
8.62
8.63
8.64
8.65
8.67
8.68.
22.0
8.46
8.47
8.48
8.50
8.51
8.52
8.53
8.54
8.55
8.57
8.58
8.59
8.60
8.61
8.63
8.64
8.65
8.66
22.1
8.44
8.46
8.47
8.48
8.49
8.50
8.51
8.53
8.54
8.55
8.56
8.57
8.59
8.60
8.61
8.62
8.63
8.64
22.2
8.43
8.44
8.45
8.46
8.47
8.49
8.50
8.51
8.52
8.53
8.55
8.56
8.57
8.58
8.59
8.60
8.62
1 8.63
22.3
8.41
8.42
8.44
8.45
8.46
8.47
8.48
8.49
8.51
8.52
8.53
8.54
8.55
8.56
8.58
8.59
8.60
8.61
22.4
8.40
8.41
8.42
8.43
8.44
8.45
8.47 1
8.48
8.49
8.50
8.51
8.52
8.54
8.55
8.56
8.57
8.58
8.59
22.5
8.38
8.39
8.40
8.41
8.43
8.44
8.45 1
8.46
8.47
8.48
8.50
8.51
8.52
8.53
8.54
8.55
8.57
8.58

North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sample Collection &Submittal Form
Central Laboratory (Water Sciences Section]
u
D
co MGtI+\ID alit' (� 5 l
�iILC .
ocatz_
%o (UL0.1n l l Q C�[
�
�
e ,-�W �
❑Ambient
❑Routine
compliance
❑ COC
Emer en
❑ g cy
❑QA
❑ Surface
❑Ground
�UasteEffluent
❑ Blank
Solution
❑River/Stream
❑Estuary
❑Stormwater
❑MonitoringWell
Field Blank
❑Filter Blank
❑other:
❑Lake
❑Cana{
❑Water Supply
❑ Influent
❑Trip Blank -
i C p
5 P__ 0
-
CJ
L{ `
State Courier
❑Hand Delivery
❑ Other:
Notes:
c
4s,
� J
Chlorinated De -chlorinated in Field
❑ ❑
Grab Composite
_ Other:
Tatorr '�l
i.
Dissolved analysis: Enter"DIS'
❑ Filtered in Field
in check-twxes for parameters
e� pear �}QSt�
t�'i�l®�
o_k�gyipara
MBAS (surfactants)
mg/L
N_ leta _ ...� . !s:
Tin (Sn)
µg/L
rjAcidity, as CaCO3, to pH 4-5/8.3 mg/L
pi] and Grease, HEM, Total Recoverable
mg/L
Aluminum (Ai)
pg/L
Titanium {Ti)
pg/L
ty, as CaCo3, to pH 4.5/8.3 mg/L
Phenols, Total Recoverable
pg/L
Antimony (Sb)
pg/L
Vanadium (V)
µgJL
ochemical Oxygen demand, 5-day mg/L
Residue: Total (rotalSolids)
mg/L
Arsenic (As)
pg/L
Zinc (Zn)
µg/L
cBOD: Carbonaceous BOD, 5-day mg/L
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Total
mg/L
Barium (Ba)
pg/L
Coliform: Fecal MF /100ml
Residue: Suspended (Suspended Solids)
mg/L
Beryllium (Be)
pg/L
Baron (8), Total
µg/L
Coliform: Total MF /100ml
Residue: Volatile/Fixed, Suspended
mg/L
Cadmium (Cd)
pg/L
Mercury 1631, low-level
ng/L
Coliform: Tube Fecal /loom]
TDS - Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
Calcium (Ca)
mg/L
Coliform: Tube Total /100ml
Silica
mg/L
Chromium (Cr), Total
pg/L
QiROMm _'_
Specific Conductance, at 25 °C umhos/cm
Sulfide
mg/L
Cobalt (Co)
pg/L
Acid Herbicides
TOC - Total Organic Carbon mg/L
Tannin & Lignin
mg/L
Copper (Cu)
pg/L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Turbidity NTU
Iron (Fe)
pg/L
Organonitrogen Pesticides
�arafrs:
Lead (Pb)
pg/L
Organophosphorus Pesticides
tiYilT6t;yi .. _
pH
S.U.
Lithium (Li)
pg/L
PCBs {polychlorinated biphenyls}
Bromide mg/L
Hardness, Total as CaCO3 - by titration
mg/L
Magnesium (Mg)
mg/L
Chloride mg/L
Manganese (Mn)
pg/L
Semi -Volatile Organics (BNAs)
Fluoride mg/L
Mercury (Hg)
pg/L 1
TPH Diesel Range
Sulfate mg/L
lIdiff- sl
Molybdenum (Mo)
pg/L
Chlorophyll a pg/L
Ammonia as N (NH3-N)
mg/L
Nickel (N])
pg/L
Volatile Organics (VOA)
Color_ ADM c.u.
Nitrate -Nitrite as N (NO3+NO2-N)
mg/L
Potassium (K)
mg/L
Color: Platinum Cobalt c.u.
otal Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N (TKN)
mg/L
Selenium (Se)
pg/L
TPH Gasoline Range
COD: chemical oxygen Demand mg/L
Total Phosphorus as P (TP)
mg/L
Silver (Ag)
pg/L
Cyanide, Total mg/L
Nitrite as N (NOZ-N)
mg/L
Sodium (Na)
mg/L
-
Formaldehyde mg/L
Nitrate as N (NO3-N calculated)
mg/L
Strontium (Sr)
pg/L
Phytoplankton / Algae
Hexavalent Chromium (Cr6+) mg/L
Orthophosphate as P (PO4)
mg/L
Thallium (TI)
pg/L
LAB COMMENTS
Revision:

AC3744o North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section Laboratory Results
Loc. Deem:
County: RANDOLPH Collector. M ROSEBROCK VISRID
Region: WSRO Report To WSRO Location ID: KOOPMANDAIRES
River Basin CPF01 Collect Date: 04/0812017 Priority COMPLIANCE
Emergency Collect Time: 10:,t{ Sample Matrix: WASTEWATER
COG Yes/No Sample Depth Loc. Type: EfNuent
Final Report
Sample ID:
AC 7440 -
PO Number #
Date Received:
WM712017
Time Received:
21LIM
Labworks LoginlD
TASCENZOI
Delivery Method
Cam, Cour er
Final Report Date:
4117117
Report Print Date:
0411812017
If this report is labeled preliminary report, the results have not been validated. Do not use for Regulatory purposes.
Result/ jLnih Method Analysis
CAS At Analyte Name P�,1 Qualifier Reference Date validated by
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab 1.9 °C 07117 MSWIFT
MIC
BOD, 5-Day in liquid 2.0 1300 mg1L SM 5210 B-2001 417117 ESTAFFORDI
NUT
NH3 as N in liquid
0.02
47
mg/L as N
EPA 350.1 REV 2 4/11/17
CGREEN
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid
0.02
1.2
mg/Las N
EPA 353.2 REV 2 4/11/17
CGREEN
Phosphorus total as P in liquid
0.02
23
mg1L as P
EPA 365.1 REV 2 4/10/17
CGREEN
Total Neldahl N as N in liquid
0.2
110
mg1L as N
EPA 351.2 REV 2 4113/17
CGREEN
WSS Chemistry Laboratory>> 1623 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 (919) 7334908
"Not Detected" or"U" does not indicate the sample is anWe free but that the anatyte is not detected at or above the POL.
Page 1 of 1

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 760060 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC760060 [ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Vlait: Complaint County: Randolph Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 04/0612017 EntryTime: 10:15 am Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Koopman Dairies Inc Owner Email:
Owner: Koopman Dairies Inc Phone:
Mailing Address: 204 Lloyd Rd Statesville NC 28625
Physical Address: 4105 Meredall Farm Rd Liberty NC 27298
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 51' 22" Longitude: 79° 38' 27"
Farm address: 4718 Ramseur- Julian Road, Liberty, NCUS Hwy 421 south from GSO. Right onto Old Liberty Rd. Right onto
Ramseur -Julian Rd. Farm is on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
704-876-4949
Certified Operator: Ard Koopman Operator Certification Number: 997080
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Slte Representative(s): Name Title J Phone
24 hour contact name Ard Koopman Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Ard Koopman Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector{s).
r `-
Inspectlon Summary:
Melissa Rosebrock
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

r � ,
Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
1. Observed animal waste flowing from application fields and into Sandy Creek (Water Supply III, Cape Fear River Basin).
WSRO-DWR sampled the run-off waste for fecal coliform, BOD, and nutrients.
2. Site conditions: Temperature=56 degrees F; very windy; partly sunny; very strong waste odor on areas nearest Old Red Cross
Road. Dead worms were observed in puddles of waste in the field. Puddles were very dark in color. Application tracks from slurry
equipment were noted in the fields. Waste had been applied to small grain on fields across the road. Stream is 10-15 feel wide.
Stream water was much darker in color, with more discolored foam, downstream of the denuded application fields, which
suggests discharge had been occurring prior to our arrival today. No discoloration noted in the stream and tributary upstream of
the recently cleared land that had received animal waste.
3. Observed sediment run-off from newly Geared land caused by the lack of vegetation on the steep slopes and the heavy rains on
4/2/2017 and 415,12017. Some gullies have also formed and are a conveyance for the sediment and waste.
11. Waste was applied to land not in the CAWMP. Regardless, the wa a been tilled in within 2 days of application
which began 3/25/2017 and ended 4/312017. Waste was not tilled -in
��14. While th wing fields on th nUy Geared land are not in the CAWMP, the actual crop exislmg on o e e a
application fields ' UP small rain .Waste was observed on the stems and leaves of the small grain in all fields
r where a small gn' p had been lished. However, waste had not been tilled -under on the newly Gearedlbare fields that I PS` i7HT r� l
V
received e. 1 }0 i �f
15. Need to immediately establish a vegetative cover for ALL fields that received animal waste. Many acres are completely
denuded of permanent vegetation.
21. The application records received by the WSRO for tract 10730 did not include documentation of 120 minute inspections. This
will need to be sub ' d to the regional office.. �•/j� 1,
29. The waste od emi ting from ap liedkron t 0.#10730 was s strong r than is usual, possibly due to the large amount of
acreage receiving s in a short period of time.
30. The alleged discharge was reported by a complainant and investigated while the OlClowner was out of town. WSRO did not
receive notice of discharge from anyone with Koopman Dairies, Inc. prior to our visit on 402017.
32. Per OIC/Owner's records, waste was applied to tract 10730. This tract is NOT listed in any of the following versions of the
waste plan: 3/912016; 517/2010; 411712008; 8/712006, Tech specialist confirmed that the recently cleared application tract (10730),
which received the waste, is not in the waste plan. However, Koopman Dairies, Inc. does own this land. Fields receiving animal
waste, located across the road, are owned by Randy Joe Gamer.
33. Spoke to Mr. Koopman about odor complaint on 4/3/2017 while he was traveling out of town. He stated that only a half4rich of
rain had been predicted for 0410312017. Waste was applied by Mr. Koopman and his certified operators, however, Mr. Koopman
stated that they quit applying when it started to rain. Left message on 4/5/2017 for Mr, Eric Isley stating that we had now received
another call regarding the run-off of manure from the unvegetated application fields. Spoke to Mr. Koopman again on 04/0712017,
Owner/OIC said he was "trying to apply waste to stay ahead of the game" with regards to the weather and the limited opportunities
available to apply waste and plant com in the spring.
34.WSRO may need to follow-up as necessary t
page: 2

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopmen Dairies Inc Facility Number. 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Fff Cattle - Milk Cow 5,000
Total Design Capacity: 5,000
Total SS LW: 7,000,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond
04
18.00
96,00
Waste Pond
LARGE WSP #3
28.00
Waste Pond
LOWER STAGE #2
24.00
Waste Pond
UPPER STAGE #1
12.00
page: 3

",
Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : . Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
16-20 gal
min. during 1:45
hr inspection, more prior to
that
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑M
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits., dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Me
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
Cl Cl Cl ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Small Grain
(Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 2
No Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑ M
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yee_ Na Na Me
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
Cl
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
page: 5

r-
Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Records and Documents
Yes
No No He
Stocking'?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ E
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
N.
Otherlssues
Yes
No Na No
l
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
E
❑ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
0
❑ ❑
Cl
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
E.
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑ ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0
❑ ❑
❑
page: 6

r
FORM SLUR -I Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
For Recording Slurry Applicaton Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner Facility Number -
Spreader Operator
Tract &
Field #
Date
(mm/ddtyr)
"`Weather
Code
Crop Type
Field Size
(acres)
Application
Method'
Humber
of Loads
per Field
Volume of
each Load"'
(gallons)
10730
3/25/2017
clear
comsilage
55
br
20
5300
10730
3/29/2017
clear
comsilage
br
14
5300
10730
3/30/2017
clear
comsilage
br
16
5300
10730
4/3/2017
pc
consilage
br
8
7400
I
* SI = soil incorporated (disked); BR = broadcast (surface applied).
*� Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.
' Weather Codes: C-Clear, PC -Partly Cloudy, CI -Cloudy, R-Rain, S-Snow/Sleet, W-Windy 3/14/2003

i
FORM SLUR-2
Tract #
Field Size(Wetted Acres)=(A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owners Phone #
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Records
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
10730 Field #
55 Facility Number
Ard Koopman Spreader Operator
204 Lloyd Rd., Statesville, NC 28625 and Address
[phone] 1
Operators Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type comsilage Recommended PAN 196
i I
Loading (lb/acre) = (B)
111 (2) 131 (4) (51 (81 (71 (8)
****Nutrient
Source
Date
(mmldd/yr)
Number
of Loads
per Field
Volume of
each Load'
(gallons)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume per Acre
(gallons/acre)
(4) / (A)
Waste Analysis
PAN"
(lb/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(Iblacre)
(6) x (5)1 1000
Nitrogen Balance*'*
(lb/acre)
(B) - (7)
B= 196
Sp
3/26/2017
20
5,300
106,000
1,927
2.8
5.40
190.60
3/29/2017
14
5,300
74,200
1,349
2.8
3.78
186,83
4/3/2017
8
7,400
59,200
1,076
2.8
3.01
183.81
3/30/2017
16
5,300
84,800
1,542
2.8
4.32
179.50
Crop Cycle Totals: 324,200 j 16.50
Owners Signature Spreader Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (print) Operator Certification No.
' Can be found in operators manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owners manual.
'* See your waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
'Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.
'""'Enter nutrient source (ie. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.) 12/20/2006

440iii- Verixnn LTE' , 4:42' PM I BMW
y LIBERTY
1 R. NORTH CAROLINA,
SUN MON TUC WED THU FRI SAT
4
Moa 4/$-,
r
Day
RealFeel@,' 730
*I '
Cloud
yWkth,periods,of rain and.
arthunderstorm.this afternoon
f
p tation. 65i _ SSE..
• 1 o.- W Pnd. . .
Ra�n.'0.29�ni. Speed: 8MPN.
t.
Snow.: o.01 Gusts 23MPH
.Ice:. � t '
0,01N , Cloud Cover:
Sunr' -' � 97-,
use: 7 02 AM` 'O�V [lade
'Ac
o►hr

Matl 09 2017 13:20 HP LASERJET FAX p.1
Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc.
102-A Woodwlnds Industrial Court
Cary NC, Y7511
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
www.encolsbs,com
Koopman Client: ResidentiaLNValkin (RE0151
204 Loyd Rd Project: Wastewater-Misc. Reported:
Statesville NC,29625 Project Number: Manure Sample 21-Apr-1711:06
Sample ID: ManureSample
Date Sampled; 04/i2/17 09:00
Date Received: 04/17J17 10:41
Aimlyte Result Not[a
ANA=CAL RESULTS
Allowable
Limit Units
Classical Chemistry Parameters
Ammonia as N IWO D M991
Biocbemical OxY2en demand 920106 D mg't.
Total Sas ended Solids 23M Mot
L.aboratu>y Ntunber: CAU5370-01
Sampled By; Client
Qwlificia
-;;gel Of

May 09 2017 13:17 HP LRSERJET FRR
Errvironmelntal Conservation Laboratories, Inc.
roe -A WwAvdnd. Inw.srhd court
Cary INC, 77511
Phone: [phone]M FAA: DIDA67.3516
p.l
swiw.mee4be,com
KuW.w Client. R[LldrndalAVrlkin(REQt'_)
2" Loyd Rd Proja:r. Wastewalcr-Misc. Reaamd:
SuUeavilleNC, 20625 Pm i-I Number: Manure Srnple 21-Apr•17 11:00
ANALMC& RMUTS
Sample ID: M&aura Sample
Laboratory Number CA03570-01
Date Sampled: 04112r1708:00
Sampled By: client
Date Received 0411VI7 1041
A16-14e
Aadsrc R—h Nino
liedi U,m
Wdisas
Claaakal Chemistry Parameters
Amnesia as V ine D
nyL
81nehem1ed Osygm bemaad ataao D
mart.
T-A'%.—d.d -tw. asaea
..an.
Page 1of5
U The analyte was analir2ed for but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actua4 sample preperatior
data and moisture content, where applicable.
E Th a mncerdrallon indirated for tfas onalyte Is an estimated value above the calibration range of the
instrument This value Is considered on estimate.
MR1 Method Reporting Urnift. The MRL is roughy egldtatent to the pramml quantitabon timlt (PQL) and is
based on the low point or t11e tallbraaon curve, when eppllcable, sample preparation factor, dilution
factor, and, in the case tN sal samples, molsttre content.
fJ The analysis Indicates the presence of an analyte for V^4:h there is presumptive evidence (05% or greater
ranfldenoe) to make a "tentative identification".

Mai 09 2017 13:20 HP LRSERJET FAX
P•2
Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc.
102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary NC, 27511
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
0
fg .la`
vtww.encolabo xam
Koopmzn Client: Rcsidential/Walkcin (RE015)
204 Loyd Rd Projext: Wastewater -Mix. Reported:
SulesvilleNC,28625 Project Number. ManurcSample 21-Apr-1711:06
Sample ID: Manare Sample
Dale Sampled: 04112JI 7 09:00
Dale Received: 04/12/17 10Al
Analyte Result Notes
ANALMCAL RESULTS
Allownbk
Unit Urdu
Microbiological Parameters
Coliform Fecal .2*10DOO nnsenr NrPNJroomL
Laboralmy Nam bet-.
Sampled By: Client
Qualifies
CA 05570-01 RE I
Analytes that show an allowable limit oi0 have no established limit. Please refer to t PA.gov for questions nboatyour water's quality.
NOTES ANDjQEEjNjTIQNS
B The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
D The sample was analyzed at dilutlon.
J The reported value Is between the laboratory method detection limit (MOL) and the laboratory method
reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable.
U The analyte was analyzed For but nut detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisture content, where applicable.
E The concentration Indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the
instrument. This value is considered an estimate.
MRL Method Reporting Umlt. The MRL Is roughly equivalent to the practical tluantitation limit (PQL) and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation Factor, dilution
Factor, and, in the Case of soil samples, moisture content
N The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte For whlch there is presumptive evidence (85% or greater
confidence) to make a "tentative identification".
Page 2 of 5

EZ
LL
LU
fY
LLJ
U)
a.
m
76 4"
7,49 Fr�
At
tm
Ok
F11-Z
av
A
VT�
. . . . . . .
......
I w.
. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
lilt,
i1iIII
Mr, 19 OMM 11
Ly
'3t,
�f
lily_
� '� .i
I#Ifs'
{
yst.,lj
41'll
_`'
� ��,;,.;
. ��:�. �
^,.
��'' �i
iut' 4i�1
�! . F
Elli��!�E ' !g'k`«'�iii
IIIiti
3�
�. �` �
�'�5;. fY� rv�w�y'
f' 'ti R'
.:'
.
r .,
In m
I
lib"Im
TRW. '
]
i i. l x
:pJ
IT!
"'T
INTMAit
.4akadv'igt�y!I�A"!Y
.'
�; '�'
p, r , ,.. r J:.::
..
�7
' .
_ , .!r
'
,F,
-
Wj4j
A qio
N n,MrfT

Mats 09 2017 13:20 HP LRSERJET FAX
p.3
Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc.
102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary NC, 27511
Phone: 919AS7.3090 FAX: [phone]
.rri�=O
www.eneolabs.com
Koopma, Client: ResidertbabWatkin (RE015)
204 Loyd Rd Project: Wulewater-Mist. Reported:
5uetavifle NC, 28625 Project Number: Manure Sample 21-Apr-17 1 1;(16
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION SUMMARY
Analysis
Matrix
Cerl ID
Cert Number
Ammonia350.1
Water
NC
591
BOD SM521 US
Water
NC
591
Coliform, Fecal 022311
Water
NC
591
'f5S SM254 1)
Water
NC
591
G
Bill Scott, Project Manages
Page 3 of

Mao 09 2017 13:24 HP LRSERJET FAX P. S
Sample' Preser+vad�in Vbfiflwn AIF
ENC4 Cary
Work Order: CA05570 project: des terms
Chent: ResMerrti0ft1cin (RE015) Project: Manure Sample
Logue tn., 12-Apr,17 1047 Logged By: loan King
CA055704 "t
C 12WMLP+H2So4 1 -,2" r.lr'I N I NA 1 Y r(I#I NA
Reamt Name ID Reawnt Name117
i ' 31 --d J5
2 d $
Page 5 of 5
aueIof

Page 1 of 1
Observed Precipitation
$ rn
�
rd� * * * ,$ "GS.995L
mf
http://water.weather.gov/precip/print.php?product--observed
4/11/2017

Page 1 of 1
Observed Precipitation
e� • �g s '�r�n
http://water.weather.gov/precip/print.php?product=observed 4/11/2017

Randolph County, NC Weather History
Page 1 of 2
...................... -.
%� • Shorten & Share
r Your Links for Free
-�WeatherDB US Severe Weather More - k Join Sign in
byGRAPHIQ — —
Home > Weather History > Randolph County, NC -4 Share
Explore Randolph County, NC Weather History -a Results N Guide
You are currently viewing 4 results filtered by: 0410312017 to 04I06I2017 x Neer "Liberty, NC, United $fates" x - Clear filter
only Randolph County, NC
Weather History. Sorted by Date - Earliest First i Viewing 19 List -
Show all Daily Weather -'
History) Daily
Average Daily High Daily Low Daily Daily
Search by Name Temperature Temperature Temperature Precipitation Snowfall
Ck New York City Randolph County,
North Carolina
Select a State
- - - - - O 16.5 miles 0
Search by Location
April 3, 2017 a - o -
❑ Add to Compare in, in.
Liberty, NC, United States
20 miles - Randolph County,
- North Carolina
Geography Type 9 16.5 miles 0:73
❑ City April 4, 2017
❑ County ❑ Add to Compare in.
❑ State
Randolph County,
Select Date or Date Range North Carolina
Between 04/03/2017 Q 16.5 miles 0 0
April 5, 2017 - 0 -
And 0410612017 ❑ Add to Compare in. in.
Select Month Randolph County,
Select Day
North Carolina
^
O 16.5 miles 1.1
Select Year ^ April 6, 2017
Population (2013) ❑Add to Compare
in.
❑ Under 10,000
❑ 10,000—100,OOD Compare
❑ i00,000-1M
❑ 1M+
38.4M' Source:
Displaying 1 through 4 of 4 listings
NOAA. As of April 20, 2017; refreshed daily. Show details -
https:Hdaily-weather.weatherdb.com/d/a/Randolph-County%2C-NC 4/20/2017

National Weathbr Service - Climate Data Pagel of 3
-
These data are preliminary and have not undergone final quality control by the National
Climatic Data Center (NCDC). Therefore, these. data are subject to revision. Final and certified
climate data can be accessed at the NCDC - http://www.ncdc.noaa.gQ .
Climatological Report (Daily)
482
CDUS42 KRAH 040815
CLIGSO
CLIMATE REPORT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE RALEIGH NC
412 AM EDT TUE APR 4 2017
...THE PIEDMONT TRIAD INTL AIRPORT NC CLIMATE SUMMARY FOR APRIL 3 2017...
CLIMATE NORMAL PERIOD 1981 TO 2010
CLIMATE RECORD PERIOD 1903 TO 2017
WEATHER ITEM
OBSERVED
TIME
RECORD
YEAR
NORMAL
DEPARTURE
LAST
VALUE
(LST)
VALUE
VALUE
FROM
YEAR
NORMAL
..................................................................
TEMPERATURE
(F)
YESTERDAY
MAXIMUM
73
145 PM
90
1967
67
6
63
MINIMUM
50
432 AM
25
1992
44
6
40
1972
AVERAGE 62
PRECIPITATION (IN)
YESTERDAY
MONTH TO DATE
SINCE MAR 1
SINCE JAN 1
SNOWFALL (IN)
YESTERDAY
MONTH TO DATE
SINCE MAR 1
SINCE JUL 1
SNOW DEPTH
DEGREE DAYS
HEATING
55 7 52
0.70
1.35 1960 0.13
0.57
0.00
0.70
0.38
0.32
0.07
3.26
4.11
-0.85
2.03
8.87
10.13
-1.26
8.17
0.0
8.0 1915 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
T
0.8
-0.8
0.0
8.0
7.5
0.5
4.5
0
http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah 4/11/2017

National Weather Service - Climate Data
Page 2 of 3
-10' . •1
YESTERDAY
3
10
—7
13
MONTH TO DATE
15
32
—17
15
SINCE MAR 1
451
502
—51
283
SINCE JUL 1
2621
3357
—736
2669
COOLING
YESTERDAY
0
1
-1
0
MONTH TO DATE
0
2
-2
4
SINCE MAR 1
8
7
1
30
SINCE JAN 1
12
7
5
30
WIND (MPH)
HIGHEST WIND SPEED
HIGHEST GUST SPEED
AVERAGE WIND SPEED
SKY COVER
POSSIBLE SUNSHINE MM
AVERAGE SKY COVER 0.8
25 HIGHEST WIND DIRECTION
35 HIGHEST GUST DIRECTION
10.6
WEATHER CONDITIONS
THE FOLLOWING WEATHER WAS RECORDED YESTERDAY.
THUNDERSTORM
HEAVY RAIN
RAIN
LIGHT RAIN
FOG
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (PERCENT)
HIGHEST 100 800 PM
LOWEST 61 200 PM
AVERAGE 81
S (160)
S (160)
THE PIEDMONT TRIAD INTL AIRPORT NC CLIMATE NORMALS FOR TODAY
NORMAL RECORD YEAR
MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE (F) 67 86 1934
MINIMUM TEMPERATURE (F) 44 21 1943
SUNRISE AND SUNSET
APRIL 4 201i.......... SUNRISE 701 AM EDT
APRIL 5 201i.......... SUNRISE 700 AM EDT
SUNSET
SUNSET
744 PM EDT
745 PM EDT
http://w2.weath.er.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo�ah
4/11/2017

National Weather Service - Climate Data Page 3 of 3
- INDICATES NEGATIVE NUMBERS.
R INDICATES RECORD WAS SET OR TIED.
MM INDICATES DATA IS MISSING.
T INDICATES TRACE AMOUNT.
The U.S. Naval Observatory (USNO) computes astronomical data. Therefore, the NWS does not
record, certify, or authenticate astronomical data. Computed times of sunrise, sunset, moonrise,
moonset; and twilight, moon phases and other astronomical data are available from USNO's
Astronomical Applications Department (http://www.usno.navy.mil). See
.htt ://www.usn.o.nav .mi.I/USNO/astronomical.-a l.i.cations/astronomical.-information-center/liti atio.n
for information on using these data for legal purposes.
http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah 4/11/2017

National Weather Service - Climate Data
Pagel of 3
These data are preliminary and have not undergone final quality control by the National
Climatic Data Center (NCDC). Therefore, these data are subject to revision. Final and certified
climate data can be accessed at the NCDC - httl2://www.ncdc.noaa.gov.
Climatological Report (Daily)
000
CDUS42 KRAH 030824
CLIGSO
CLIMATE REPORT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE RALEIGH NC
423 AM EDT MON APR 3 2017
...THE PIEDMONT TRIAD INTL AIRPORT NC CLIMATE SUMMARY FOR APRIL 2 2017...
CLIMATE NORMAL PERIOD 1981 TO 2010
CLIMATE RECORD PERIOD 1903 TO 2017
WEATHER ITEM OBSERVED TIME RECORD YEAR NORMAL DEPARTURE LAST
VALUE (LST) VALUE VALUE FROM YEAR
NORMAL
..................................................................
TEMPERATURE (F)
YESTERDAY
MAXIMUM 68 414 PM 87 2010 66 2 71
1967
MINIMUM
AVERAGE
PRECIPITATION (IN)
YESTERDAY
MONTH TO DATE
SINCE MAR 1
SINCE JAN 1
SNOWFALL (IN)
YESTERDAY
MONTH TO DATE
SINCE MAR 1
SINCE JUL 1
SNOW DEPTH
DEGREE DAYS
HEATING
45 640 AM
24 1923 44
1
54
57
55
2
63
0.00
2.15 1936 0.12
-0.12
0.01
0.00
0.25
-0.25
0.07
2.56
3.98
-1.42
2.03
8.17
10.00
-1.83
8.17
0.0
0.0 MM 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
T
0.8
-0.8
0.0
8.0
7.5
0.5
4.5
0
http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah 4/11/2017.

National Weather Service - Climate Data
Page 2 of 3
YESTERDAY
8
11
-3
2
MONTH TO DATE
12
22
-10
2
SINCE MAR 1
448
492
-44
270
SINCE JUL 1
2618
3347
-729
2656
COOLING
YESTERDAY
0
1
-1
0
MONTH TO DATE
0
1
-1
4
SINCE MAR 1
8
6
2
30
SINCE JAN 1.
..................................................................
12
6
6
30
WIND (MPH)
HIGHEST WIND SPEED
HIGHEST GUST SPEED
AVERAGE WIND SPEED
SKY COVER
POSSIBLE SUNSHINE MM
i AVERAGE SKY COVER 0.4
14 HIGHEST WIND DIRECTION
17 HIGHEST GUST DIRECTION
6.1
WEATHER CONDITIONS
THE FOLLOWING WEATHER WAS RECORDED YESTERDAY.
NO SIGNIFICANT WEATHER WAS OBSERVED.
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (PERCENT)
HIGHEST 83 600 AM
LOWEST 42 400 PM
AVERAGE 63
NE (60)
NE (60)
THE PIEDMONT TRIAD INTL AIRPORT NC CLIMATE NORMALS FOR TODAY
NORMAL RECORD YEAR
MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE (F) 67 90 1967
MINIMUM TEMPERATURE (F) 44 25 1992
1972
SUNRISE AND SUNSET
APRIL 3 2017......... SUNRISE 703 AM EDT SUNSET 744 PM EDT
APRIL 4 2017......... SUNRISE 701 AM EDT SUNSET 744 PM EDT
- INDICATES NEGATIVE NUMBERS.
R INDICATES RECORD WAS SET OR TIED.
MM INDICATES DATA IS MISSING.
http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah
4/11/2O17

Y+
National V,1eath41 Service - Climate Data.
Page 1 of 3
These data are preliminary and have not undergone final quality control by the National
Climatic Data Center (NCDC). Therefore, these data are subject to revision. Final and certified
climate data can be accessed at the NCDC - http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov,
Climatological Report (Daily)
845
CDUS42 KRAH 060547
CLIGSO
CLIMATE REPORT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE RALEIGH NC
145 AM EDT THU APR 6 2017
...THE PIEDMONT TRIAD INTL AIRPORT NC CLIMATE SUMMARY FOR"APRIL 5 2017...
CLIMATE NORMAL PERIOD 1981 TO 2010
CLIMATE RECORD PERIOD 1903 TO 2017
WEATHER ITEM OBSERVED TIME RECORD YEAR NORMAL DEPARTURE LAST
VALUE (LST) VALUE VALUE FROM YEAR
NORMAL
..................................................................
TEMPERATURE (F)
YESTERDAY
MAXIMUM 72 1104 AM 87 1942 67 5 62
1929
MINIMUM
53 621 AM
26 1944
44
9
39
AVERAGE
63
56
7
51
PRECIPITATION (IN)
YESTERDAY
0.08
2.03 1957
0.12
-0.04
0.00
MONTH TO DATE
0.78
0.61
0.17
0.07
SINCE -MAR 1
3.34
4.34
-1.00
2.03
SINCE JAN 1
8.95
10.36
-1.41
8.17
SNOWFALL (IN)
YESTERDAY
0.0
T 1987
0.1
-0.1
0.0
1960
1936
MONTH TO DATE
0.0
0.1
-0.1
0.0
SINCE MAR 1
T
0.9
-0.9
0.0
SINCE JUL 1
8.0
7.6
0.4
4.5
SNOW DEPTH
0
http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah 4/11/2017

National Weather Service - Climate Data
1~age 2 of 3
DEGREE DAYS
HEATING
YESTERDAY
2
10 -8
14
MONTH TO DATE
17
52 -35
33
SINCE MAR 1
453
522 -69
301
SINCE JUL 1.
2623
3377 -754
2687
COOLING
YESTERDAY
0
1 -1
0
MONTH TO DATE
4
4 0
4
SINCE MAR 1
12
9 3
30
SINCE JAN 1.
16
9 7
30
WIND (MPH)
HIGHEST WIND
SPEED
28 HIGHEST WIND DIRECTION
S (170)
HIGHEST GUST
SPEED
32 HIGHEST GUST DIRECTION
S (170)
AVERAGE WIND
SPEED
7.2
SKY COVER
POSSIBLE SUNSHINE MM
AVERAGE SKY COVER 0.6
WEATHER CONDITIONS
THE FOLLOWING WEATHER WAS RECORDED YESTERDAY.
THUNDERSTORM
LIGHT RAIN
FOG
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (PERCENT)
HIGHEST 93 900 PM
LOWEST 47 1000 AM
AVERAGE 70
THE PIEDMONT TRIAD INTL AIRPORT NC CLIMATE NORMALS FOR TODAY
NORMAL RECORD YEAR
MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE (F) 68 89 2010
1967
1929
MINIMUM TEMPERATURE (F) 45 26 1944
SUNRISE AND SUNSET
APRIL 6 2017......... SUNRISE '659 AM EDT SUNSET 746 PM EDT
APRIL 7 2017......... SUNRISE 657 AM EDT SUNSET 747 PM EDT
http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah
4/11/2017

National WeatAr Service - Climate Data
Page 3 of 3
- INDICATES
R INDICATES
MM INDICATES
T INDICATES
NEGATIVE NUMBERS.
RECORD WAS SET OR TIED.
DATA IS MISSING.
TRACE AMOUNT.
The U.S. Naval Observatory (USNO) computes astronomical data. Therefore, the NWS does not
record, certify, or authenticate astronomical data. Computed times of sunrise, sunset, moonrise,
moonset; and twilight, moon phases and other astronomical data are available from USNO's
Astronomical Applications Department (http://www.usno.navy.mil). See
http:l/www.usno.nav_y.miI/USNO/astronomical-applications/astronomical„-infon-nation-center/Iiti ag_tion
for information on using these data for legal purposes.
http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah 4/ 11 /2017

National Weather Service - Climate Data Page 1 of 3
These data are preliminary and have not undergone final quality control by the National
Climatic Data Center (NCDC). Therefore, these data are subject to revision. Final and certified
climate data can be accessed at the NCDC - http://www.nede.noaa.go .
Climatological Report (Daily)
000
CDUS42 KRAH 050832
CLIGSO
CLIMATE REPORT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE RALEIGH NC
430 AM EDT WED APR 5 2017
...THE PIEDMONT TRIAD INTL AIRPORT NC CLIMATE SUMMARY FOR APRIL 4 2017...
CLIMATE NORMAL PERIOD 1981 TO 2010
CLIMATE RECORD PERIOD 1903 TO 2017
WEATHER ITEM OBSERVED TIME RECORD YEAR NORMAL DEPARTURE LAST
VALUE (LST) VALUE VALUE FROM YEAR
NORMAL
..................................................................
TEMPERATURE (F)
YESTERDAY
MAXIMUM 79 501 PM 86 1934 67 12 76
MINIMUM 58 1159 PM 21 1943 44 14 46
AVERAGE 69 56 13 61
PRECIPITATION (IN)
YESTERDAY
0.00
0.93 2013
0.11
-0.11
T
MONTH TO DATE
0.70
0.49
0.21
0.07
SINCE MAR 1
3.26
4.22
-0.96
2.03
SINCE JAN 1
8.87
10.24
-1.37
8.17
SNOWFALL (IN)
YESTERDAY
0.0
T 2013
0.0
0.0
0.0
1992
1987
MONTH TO DATE
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SINCE MAR 1
T
0.8
-0.8
0.0
SINCE JUL 1
8.0
7.5
0.5
4.5
SNOW DEPTH
0
1
DEGREE DAYS
http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah 4/11/2017

National Weather Service - Climate Data
HEATING
Page 2 of 3
YESTERDAY
0
10
-10
4
MONTH TO DATE
15
42
-27
19
SINCE MAR 1
451
512
-61
287
SINCE JUL 1
2621
3367
-746
2673
COOLING
YESTERDAY
4
1
3
0
MONTH TO DATE
4
3
1
4
SINCE MAR 1
12
8
4
30
SINCE JAN 1
..................................................................
16
8
8
30
WIND (MPH)
HIGHEST WIND SPEED 24 HIGHEST WIND DIRECTION
HIGHEST GUST SPEED 30 HIGHEST GUST DIRECTION
AVERAGE WIND SPEED 12.0
SKY COVER
POSSIBLE SUNSHINE MM
AVERAGE SKY COVER 0.6
WEATHER CONDITIONS
THE FOLLOWING WEATHER WAS RECORDED YESTERDAY.
NO SIGNIFICANT WEATHER WAS OBSERVED.
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (PERCENT)
HIGHEST 100 1200 AM
LOWEST 37 500 PM
AVERAGE 69
W (260)
W (260)
THE PIEDMONT TRIAD INTL AIRPORT NC CLIMATE NORMALS FOR TODAY
NORMAL RECORD YEAR
MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE (F) 67 87 1942
1929
MINIMUM TEMPERATURE (F) 44 26 1944
SUNRISE AND SUNSET
APRIL 5 2017......... SUNRISE 700 AM EDT SUNSET 745 PM EDT
APRIL 6 2017......... SUNRISE 659 AM EDT SUNSET 746 PM EDT
INDICATES NEGATIVE NUMBERS.
R INDICATES RECORD WAS SET OR TIED.
http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah
4/11/2017

National Weather Service - Climate Data
MM INDICATES DATA IS MISSING.
T INDICATES TRACE AMOUNT.
Page 3 of 3
The U.S. Naval Observatory (USNO) computes astronomical data. Therefore, the NWS does not
record, certify, or authenticate astronomical data. Computed times of sunrise, sunset, moonrise,
moonset; and twilight, moon phases and other astronomical data are available from USNO's
Astronomical Applications Department (http://www.usno.navy.mil). See
htt://www.usno.nav .mit/IJSNO/astronomical-a Iications/astronomical-in.fom- ation-center/liti ation
for information on using these data for legal purposes.
http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah
4/11/2017

National Weather Service - Climate Data Pagel of 3
These data are preliminary and have not undergone final quality control by the National
Climatic Data Center (NCDC). Therefore, these data are subject to revision. Final and certified
climate data can be accessed at the NCDC - http://www.nedc.noaa.gov.
Climatological Report (Daily)
236
CDUS42 KRAH 070614
CLIGSO
CLIMATE REPORT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE RALEIGH NC
210 AM EDT FRI APR 7 2017
...THE PIEDMONT TRIAD INTL AIRPORT NC CLIMATE SUMMARY FOR APRIL 6 2017...
CLIMATE NORMAL PERIOD 1981 TO 2010
CLIMATE RECORD PERIOD 1903 TO 2017
WEATHER ITEM OBSERVED TIME RECORD YEAR NORMAL DEPARTURE LAST
VALUE (LST) VALUE VALUE FROM YEAR
NORMAL
..................................................................
TEMPERATURE (F)
YESTERDAY
MAXIMUM 62 809 AM 89 2010 68 -6 60
1967
1929
MINIMUM
46 1153 PM
26 1944
45
1
32
AVERAGE
54
56
-2
46
PRECIPITATION (IN)
YESTERDAY
0.10
2.03 1936
0.12
-0.02
0.00
MONTH TO DATE
0.88
0.73
0.15
0.07
SINCE MAR 1
3.44
4.46
-1.02
2.03
SINCE JAN 1
9.05
10.48
-1.43
8.17
SNOWFALL (IN)
YESTERDAY
0.0
T 2007
0.0
0.0
0.0
1931
MONTH TO DATE
0.0
0.1
-0.1
0.0
SINCE MAR 1
T
0.9
-0.9
0.0
SINCE JUL 1
8.0
7.6
0.4
4.5
SNOW DEPTH
0
http://w2.weather,gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah 4/11/2017

National Weather Service - Climate Data
Page 2 of 3
DEGREE DAYS
HEATING
YESTERDAY
11
9
2
19
MONTH TO
DATE
28
61
-33
52
SINCE MAR
1
464
531
-67
320
SINCE JUL
1
2634
3386
-752
2706
COOLING
YESTERDAY
0
1
-1
0
MONTH TO
DATE
4
5
-1
4
SINCE MAR
1
12
10
2
30
SINCE JAN
1
16
10
6
30
WIND (MPH)
HIGHEST WIND SPEED
HIGHEST GUST SPEED
AVERAGE WIND SPEED
SKY COVER
POSSIBLE SUNSHINE MM
AVERAGE SKY COVER 0.7
36 HIGHEST WIND DIRECTION
45 HIGHEST GUST DIRECTION
17.2
WEATHER CONDITIONS
THE FOLLOWING WEATHER WAS RECORDED YESTERDAY.
RAIN
LIGHT RAIN
FOG
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (PERCENT)
HIGHEST 1.00 400 AM
LOWEST 42 300 PM
AVERAGE 71
SW (240)
S (200)
3
THE PIEDMONT TRIAD INTL
AIRPORT
NC CLIMATE
NORMALS FOR TODAY
NORMAL
RECORD
YEAR
MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE (F)
68
91
1967
MINIMUM TEMPERATURE (F)
45
24
1982
SUNRISE AND SUNSET
APRIL 7 2017......... SUNRISE
APRIL 8 2017......... SUNRISE
657 AM EDT SUNSET 747 PM EDT
656 AM EDT SUNSET 748 PM EDT
http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah
4/11/2017

National Weather Service - Climate Data
- INDICATES NEGATIVE NUMBERS.
Page 3 of 3
R INDICATES RECORD WAS SET OR TIED.
MM INDICATES DATA IS MISSING.
T INDICATES TRACE AMOUNT.
The U.S. Naval Observatory (USNO) computes astronomical data. Therefore, the NWS does not
record, certify, or authenticate astronomical data. Computed times of sunrise, sunset, moonrise,
moonset; and twilight, moon phases and other astronomical data are available from USNO's
Astronomical Applications Department (http://www.usno.navy.mil). See
htt ://www.usno.nav .iniI/USNO/astronomical-a lications/astronomical-information-center/liti ation
for information on using these data for legal purposes.
http://w2.weather.gov/climate/getclimate.php?wfo=rah 4/11/2017

Randolph County GIS
Page 1 of 1
Q Identify = Ma
A Randolph
County GIS
0p
8
Quick Search
Identify
y
8716176239
0
KOOPMAN DAIRIES INC 0
Community Info
Map Themes
Print
4107 MEREDELL FARM RD Zoom to
- Additional Addresses
Community Info Tax Assessment
Buildina Photo/Sketch Tax Bill
All Owners All Addresses Map Links
REID 83106
PIN 8716176239
TAXED .439.00 ti=
ACREAGE ;
}------
PROPERTY BARRY KENT & . .
DESCRIPTION PENNY WAUGH `
JOHNSON;TR2,6 +TR
DEED BOOK & 002368101364
PAGE
s �
k
PLAT BOOK & 13"9 s�o a -
PAGE
OWNER KOOPMAN DAIRIES
INC
OWNER 204 LOYD DR - -
ADDRESS
OWNER
ADDRESS2
OWNER CITY STATESVILLE..
OWNER STATE NC
OWNER ZIP 28626
LOCATION 4107 MEREDELL
ADDRESS_ FARM RD - '
Additional Addresses
LOCATION ZIP, LIBERTY,27298
DATA 6/21/2017
REFRESHED -_____
1
4nOftp i x
870
O
Street View
http://gis.randolphcountync.gov/randolphjs/
5/22/2017

Page 1 of 1
'si ,ty: /3l ...} {M* i �i r!♦�•,S,p'?� Sr� �^�t)i ��5'i4 ''li'/ N 7 p.:
`i; tr��,7��i' 4j(��T
r'r�, s' r} 1 , fef '-i .9�5� -; ;{' .�f! t y�
f�S
1•' .�;� .�,�.�: ',i• '� r�ye'f;�7�:'.� .�*� p4:'R+' yt��T �-� 7.'_,rt
= ri'S,�'t-�nr7' ,�if?p�'j:jr� - it ,�., ��,��] �:�t�•. i+�... .+:
r! .. l.y,a �' r '.. r , / .. `� e j } i } ,-;P! ^ fi•' {d,._�'t's,x+rl'^ } ,'?t
h _ ! 1 ..J ] C: � ,' �' � T � ��f 3� ✓� d� t6.r.r a.r�p+l2..
'f `� tJ t ���,"ef."�s V l.t+1!a•F':,/w � ':{�nn�) `�t �f,o �r'V�+XA}ke�� �i�a� �'1`�fi ��; ��
R. ,,� ��.. l� .. fir. r _ , kl 4� i-..s d. Ir� 7 a�,'• Y _ ,
7068T8234
i ! �J — R .'`• L^ fix• i �' 4�
,V'
) 8708982903 � �E � . r
KI
i E 9
8718176239 .,i fro•
r
8706663751
5 b
S
8706782113 8706955237
870675668
Disclaimer' This map was compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and other public records Map Scale
r3 and data. Users of this data are hereby notified that the aforementioned public information 1 inch = 333 feet
sources should be consulted for verification of the information. Randolph County, its 5/22/2017
agents and employees make no warranty as to the accuracy of the information on this map,
about:blank 5/22/2017

Rosebrock, Melissa
From:
Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Thursday, April 20, 2017 10:42 AM
To:
Rosebrock, Melissa
Cc:
Freeman, Randy S.
Subject:
RE: Koopman application fields
Melissa:
I've reviewed the PIN noted below and it is also associated with a farnn/tract not in Mr. Koopman's plan. I looked
at an older 2015 plan as well as Buttke's plan to see if the tract(s) had been either mistakenly deleted and/or placed
in the wrong plan — neither the case. So, like with the other tracts it appears he has applied waste to land not in his
plan.
From: Rosebrock, Melissa[mailto:melissa.rose [e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 11:50 AM
To: Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC < Randy. [e-mail]>; Randy Freeman
<[e-mail]>
Subject: Koopman application fields
Hey there,
Do either of you know if the fields across the road (off Old Red Cross Road) from the cleared land are in Mr. Koopman's
waste plan? I could not tell for sure from the maps in the waste plan. These fields had also received waste on small grain
(which looked great). Per GIS, the fields across the road are owned by Randy Joe Garner, located at 3757 Old Red Cross
Road. Parcel ID# for one of the fields is: 7798919504. If these fields ARE in the waste plan, I'm assuming he has a lease
agreement?
Just FYI -We investigated the complaint last Thursday and observed an active discharge of waste from the application fields
on the south side of the road so we will be pursuing enforcement on that in addition to not tilling the waste under within
two days (on bare ground). We will also enforce for applying to land NOT in the waste plan so I wanted to check on the
north side land fields as well.
Will keep you posted. Thanks for your assistance.
Melissa
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
[e-mail]
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.

This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any
unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law
and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender and delete the email immediately.

Rosebrock. Melissa
From: Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC < Randy. [e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2017 12:57 PM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa
Subject: Re: Koopman Complaint
None of these are in the current plan
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2017, at 12:26 PM, Rosebrock, Melissa <melissa.rose [e-mail]> wrote:
None of these parcels are in the plan? Or only parts are in plan? I am probably heading out there tomorrow.
Thanks Randy.
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
INC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
melissa. [e-mail]
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, INC 27105
<image001.png>
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records taw and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC [mailto:Randy.Blackwood2nc.usda.pov]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 9:08 AM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Koopman Complaint
They're not part of the latest (3/16/16) plan that I have.
From: Rosebrock, Melissa [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 5:23 PM
To: Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC < Randy. [e-mail]>
Cc: Randy Freeman <[e-mail]>
Subject: Koopman Complaint
Randy,
Got a complaint today, mostly about odor, regarding land application activities off Old Red Cross
Road. Caller was also concerned about runoff.

Question: Are these parcels in his waste plan? Ard says the fields at the front of the property (near road?)
are in the plan, but he's not sure about the rest. There are about 110 total acres and he says he has cleared
about 2/3 of it. Complainant says he has applied waste on all the cleared land.
Per GIS, the following parcels are owed by Koopman Dairies, Inc., just need to know if they are in his waste
plan. Thank you!!
PIN 8707191668
PIN 8708114338
PIN 8708106667
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
rnelissa. rosebrock(cr�.ncdenr.gov
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
<image001.png>
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended
recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information
it contains may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe
you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.