760060_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

0 1/10/12 18:19 FAX Z002
Pk irllp CJr =� 1 fe r f V. -4 / 333
JVO Lo m oe r W,"5 A -f f) be., (9 7 6- )9-r
8, #-ke, ,parr y swt-groti, fey. -4 76 6 o
�— G� � �� 6 � ,4.a.,p cv►G � �r

01/10/2N�12 15:19 FAI
• f� 001
�rovw P Jll p Wrlf�tj-"

N
Rosebrock, Melissa
From: Rosebrock, Melissa
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:55 PM
To: 'Charlie Loyd'
Cc: Hudyncia, Joseph
Subject: RE: Phillip Wright (reports)
Thanks Phillip. Not sure what's up with the fax machine as I received others ok. ??
Anyways, in looking at the calibration for the Nelson Big Gun 200, it appears that the observed flow rate (416 gpm) was
NOT within 10% of the Designed flow rate (355 gpm). 355 x .10 = 35.5 Therefore, 355 + 35.5 =390.5 gpm should be the
upper, allowable, flow. You should check "No" for the question about flow rate.
Please contact me if you need to discuss. Higher flow rate could be due to the fact that the observed gun pressure was
75 psi instead of the designed psi of only 70.
Thanks for completing the irrigation calibration so quickly. I'll put this in my file and have copied Joe so that he will know
it's completed as well.
Melissa
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Specialist
DENR- Division of Water Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27107
(,3,36) 771-5289; fax [phone]:3o
Please note: my e-mail address has changed to melissa.rosebrock a ncdenr.gov
E-mail correspondence to and from this udclress may he subject to the
North C M-olina Public Retards Law anti mcry he disclosed to third parties,
From: Charlie Loyd [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:26 PM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa
Subject: Phillip Wright (reports)
Melissa, Please see attachments, could not get fax to go through.
Thanks
Phillip Wright
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.

Farm Name k, N A 4m, )/ A&f-
Farm #�
Equipment identification:
Flow Meter Serial Number (if applicable): frrf 'A,�T �T_
Type of System (circle one), Stationary Traveling, Center Pivot
Desianed/Expectedi ObservedlMeasured
d
GunlSprinklerModei: 1I/i,ISo� �,'4 6VA9
Nozzle Type: qpr f. 14�_� , _ Taut— o r
Ring/Nozzle Diameter (in.):
Nozzle Pressure (psi):
is observed pressure operating within tha range ro mmendod by the marnulacturer orspeclfred in the
irrigation design documentation ? YES NO
Wetted Diameter (it.): 3 q
"` Is the observed wetted diameter within 16% of the wetted diameter reported in manufacturer's chart ror the
observed nozzle pressure? YES . t/ NO
Flow Rate (3pm)
`•' Is the observed flow rate within 10% or the value specified in the im'yatron design or as was determined
during the wettebleletfective irrigated acre determination?YES ✓ NO
Observed Flow Rate Determined by: Chart -Calibrated Flow Meter, Z a
VOTE --- The observed flow rate must be determined using EITHER:
) the manufacturer's chart for the moasurod (observed) pressure at the gun/sprinktar AND the measured
un/sprinkier orifice diameter, OR
measured with an a ved calibrated flow meter.
Person Performing Calibration - k-//'d V � Date /e
(Si nature)
DWO-Cal-Form 1212009

•Farm Name,
Farm # a -- (L-) -
low
Equipment Identification:
Flow Meter Serial Number (if applicabie):
Type of System (circle one): Stationary, raveling Center Pivot,
DeshrneggUected. Observed/Messured
Gun/Sprinkler Model 1s 2 00 Ili i a.vr 1$ 0
Nozzle Type: JAPo. r o k Q- I r _ Ta
Ring/Nozzle diameter (In.): _ T �; ,�,- L2-
,
Nozzle Pressure (psi): 70
is observed pressure operating within the range. recommended by the manufacturer or specified in the
irrigation design documentation ? YES ✓ NO
Wetted Diameter (tt.): 3 7 "'
" is the observed wetted diameter within 15% of the wetted diameter reported In menufacturat's chart for the
observed nozzle prOssure? YES ✓ NO
Flow Rate (gpm): i j •'*
••' is the observed flow rate within 10% of the value specified in thdesign or as was determined
during the wettableleffeclive irrigated acre determination? YESe imga an . NO i .
Observed Flow Rate Determined by: Chart Calibrated Flow:Meter 11600
NOIT -- The observed flow rate must be determined using EITHER:
1) the manufacturer's chart for the measured (observed),pressure of the gunisprinkler AND the measured
Fun/sprinkler orifice diameter, OR
measured with an approved, calibrated flow meter.
Person Performing Calibration WA Date 3
(Slpn tore)
DW O-Cal-Forms 212009

Re: Kings Mill manure transfer to NCSU.
0
Subject: Re: Kings Mill manure transfer to NCSU.
From: Melissa Rosebrock <Meli ssa.Rosebro ck@ncmail. net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:55:13 -0500
To: Joseph. [e-mail], Randy Blackwood <[e-mail]>
Sounds ok to me Joe. Just a statement regarding how the waste is being handled is
all I'm looking for. And this is only if they continue using the separator after
the 30-day period.
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Specialist
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston --Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
On 1/27/2009 2:18 PM, Joseph Hudyncia wrote:
Melissa,
From a• Nutrient Management perspective, the movement of liquid waste is pretty
much unchanged. The separator drains liquid back into the original liquid waste
"stream". The solids are stored in a brand new covered structure, so there is
no potential nutrient movement from there. Solids removal will only improve the
performance of the liquid irrigation system, and there will be less nutrients
overall for the farm to apply to fields. All in all the environmental impacts
appear positive.
In the narrative amendment we need to address operation and maintenance of the
new components in relation to the whole waste management system. Also, a
contingency plan for new component (separator) failure needs to be incorporated,
i.e. how will the waste system operate in a compliant manner if the solid
separator becomes inoperable.
Joe
on 1/27/2009 1:35 PM, Melissa Rosebrock wrote:
Wanted to update you all:
Just spoke with the QIC for Kings Mill, Phillip Wright. The proposed
transfer did not take place last week as planned. Hopefully this week.
Phillip says that they are pumping dairy waste from the concrete pit (that
was constructed for the Super Soils System) and running the waste into a NEW
solids separator (which is NOT currently part of their waste plan or the
Super Soils System). The solids separator is located on the concrete lane so
that the separated solids fall into a pile on the concrete, and are then
moved into a covered "white building" originally to be used for the Super
Soils project. The liquid portion flows on concrete back into the liquid
waste drainage way and into the waste pond. I've seen this concrete
area ---it's not an environmental concern in my opinion.
However, I told Phillip that the correct procedure would have been for Mr.
Faulk to submit a proposal for the temporary use of a solids separator and
let us ok it. Phillip says they will know within a month if the NCSU project
l of 2 1/28/2009 2:55 PM

Re: Kings Mill manure transfer to NCSU. 41
•
is going to work. I told him if the solids separator is to be a permanent
Part of their waste handling system that it MUST be added to their waste
plan. A narrative is fine with me. Any thought from you guys?
Phillip will be keeping records on when`, where, how much, and nutrients
analysis for his records. FYI --nitrogen has been running about 5 lbs. N/ton.
They will be hauling 3-4 tons each time (one load) to NCSU for the
gasification experiment.
2 of 2 1/28/2009 2:55 PM

& 0 0
Eco Current
To.
Melissa RosebroclC
DWQ-Winston Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown St.
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Cc:
Keith Larick
Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Date: January 22, 2009
Buster Towel]
DWQ-Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Everett Phillip'Wright
Kings Mill DCF
4105 Meredell Farm Road
Liberty, NC 27298
Re: Transportation of Separated Cattle Manure from Kingsmill Farm (Liberty,
NC) to NCSU Animal & Poultry Waste Management Center (Raleigh, NC)
Dear Ms.Rosebrook and Mr. Towel],
I ant providing this letter and the attached documents at Keith Larick's request,,
whom l have also ec'd on this correspondence.
My company, EcoCurrent, Inc., is the recipient of a "North Carolina Green
Business Fund" grant, administered by the N.C. Department of Commerce, to test several
animal waste treatment technologies. One of these technologies is a thermal processing
unit located at NCSU's Animal & Poultry Waste Management Center (APWMC) in
Raleigh. We are in the process of conducting a number of test runs of this unit with
different types of animal waste. With the exception of cattle manure, all waste to be
tested will be generated at the APWMC.
As no cattle are located at the APWMC, we intend to collect separated cattle
manure from the Kings Mill dairy farni in Liberty, NC, and to transport that waste by
covered truck to the APWMC. Our plan would be to transport to NCSU enough waste to
accommodate approximately 2.5 days of tests. While we do not yet know this regluir d3S1 Hargett street
Suite 300
tonnage with certainty, we expect that approximately one to two tons wouldrffeed46,boh Cardr„o 27601
ecocurrent, cx,)m
919, 743.25201
919, 7 43, 2501 1

I +
' i 0
Ecoturrent
transported in several loads. Our hope would be to transport the waste beginning in the
next week.
On December 22" d we met with Mr, Larick to discuss this project and whether
any special pcnnits or amendments would be required. Following subsequent
correspondence, Mr. Larick emailed me on January 9`I' that a.letter from NCS'U stating
that they were grilling to receive the cattle manure from the Kings Mill farm would be
sufficient to permit this waste transport request. In the same email Mr. Larick instructed
me to send a copy of that letter to each of you, as the appropriate DWQ representatives in
the Regional Offices that oversee both the "sending" and "receiving" facilities.
For your information, I have included with this cover letter the following
attachments:
• A letter from Dr. C. Mike Williams, manager of the APWMC, stating NCSU's
willingness to accept up to two tons of separted cattle manure from Kings Mill
farm,
• A copy of the cover page for Kings Mill Farm's Waste Management Plan;
+ A copy of recent sampling results of separated cattle manure collected from Kings
Mill Farm.
Please contact me iminediately by phone (919,802.5160) if you require any additional
information. Thank you very much for your time and assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Jason Tundermann
Secretary
EcoCurrent, Inc.
111 East Har ett. Street
&Ae 300
Raleigh. North Carolina 27601
ecacurrent-corn
919.743.2520 t
919.74:3,2501 f

01/21/2009 13:39 9195154 NCSU POULTRY SCIft PAGE 01/01
NOO Carolina State University is a land- Animal 8 Poultry Worte
grant unive.rsily and a constituent Institution Managamont Contor
of The University of Norlh Carolina
Campus Box 7508
Aal@l N NC 27895 MO
7Januairy 20, 2009 919.515.5388
919.513.176211`0
Jason Tundennann
ECOCURRENT, INC.
I I I East Hargett Street
Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Re: North. Carolina State University (NCSU) Animal and Poultry Waste
Management Center (APWMC) utilization of cattle/dairy manure from Kings Nil
DCF farm located in Liberty, NC
Dear Mr. Tundcrmann:
This letter documents that pursuant to objectives within a "nsorod project between
NCSU APWMC and ECOCURRENT, INC. we require a small to moderate gnantity.o£
cattle/dairy manure from the referenced farm located in Liberty NC. We anticipate the
quantity to not exceed a wet weight total of 2 tons. The manure will be transported in
sealed containers to the NCSU APWMC Waste Processing Facility located at the NCSU
Lake Wheeler Field Laboratory in ,Raleigh, NC. NCSU APWMC will process the
manure through a gasification unit located at the referenced laboratory site. (Note: this
technology has been determined to meet `Environmentally Superior Technology' criteria
for the processing of nutrients and metals, and emissions of odor, ammonia, and
pathogenic microorganisms contained within animal manure.) Any residuals from the
processing of the Kings Mill DCF sourced manure will be managed per the NC DETt-lNR
(nutrient management permits held by NCSU APWMC.
We look forward to continued progress with our project with ECOCURRENT, .INC. to
develop improved options for processing animal manure for renewable energy.
Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions re subject of this letter.
Sincerely,
C.M. (Mike) Williams
Professor and director NCSU APWMC

r
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
N 04-17-2008
This plan has been prepared for:
l
Kings Hill DCF
Everett Phillip Wright
4105 meredell Farm Rd
Liberty, NC 27298
[phone]
This plan has been developed by:
Randy Blackwood
USDA-JVRCS
Asheboro Field Office
241 Sunset Avenue
Suite 105, Fed. Bldg.
Asheboro, h'C 27203
(336) N9-4449 --' /]
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Own erlManager/Producer Agreement
1 (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. 1 have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) l Date
P1t�Ova
� 7-
-Signature (manager or proL
ucer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: -q04
Technical Specialist Signature ate
.................................•--.............---.-----•...............................................................................
............................--........--.--.................................
563606 Database Version 3.1pate Printed: 04-17-2008 Cover Page i

CL
Ln
t-
0
r.
0
m
x
Cr
w
w
of
w
s
tz
m
a
0
0
cu
t`
0
m
n
KDAM *uumic Division !'bane: (919)733-5 Web Site: ►vv. .c©mJgromO>1VRepoft
W9134
Grouw.
}
Waste A miysis Repw
FgH4 David
5914 " Rd
Durham, NC 27703
Copies To_ Tilietl, Eric
1Zl23IfAN
ntrf"M couaty
ubem� &SE&S *m Pffmoon t
arxpkM
N
P K ca S
Fe Afin Zn
CH
B Alb Gl C
Tidal 12699
15M 631G 6715 2017 1637
531 68-6 124
93.2
114 436966
!N-�Y
Taste Codes
,tlla
Na Ni Cd Pb Al
Se Li PR
SS
C.N Dm% LUP% ALE(tuns)
WSOVOM
URN
2081
&54
123
34A I 17.49
OMPOSIed R#a waste
Crea
Nulriem A=U* for rwa Croy
ft"st CRY bah
OthCr meff"Its lbslton wet basis
pplicarkm MC*d
N P205 K20 Ca mg . S Fe hfn Zn Cu
B ' alto ff
Na
M Cd Pb .41 Se &
$r0adC251.
I's 0.72 2-1 1.4 0.42 0-34 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.02
T
0.73
361 Incorp
22 0.90 2.4 [A 0.53 0.43 0.14 0.02 0.03 0.02
T
0.73
;completed 1ZJ?YM

Eco�Current
To: Keith Larick
Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Date: January 9, 2009
i141eflSfq Kase In,-�
wig o
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept of ENR
JAN 15. 20
Winston-Salem
Reglonal mice
Re: Request for amendment to Kingsmill Farm Waste Management Plan to
accommodate animal waste treatment test at NCSU
Dear Mr. Larick,
Thank you again for taking the time to meet with us on December 22nd to discuss
EcoCurrent's goals and relevant North Carolina water quality regulations. We look
forward to working closely with you and your department as we continue to develop and
commercialize animal waste and wastewater treatment systems in North Carolina.
As we discussed, EcoCurrent has received a grant from the N.C. Department of
Commerce to evaluate several promising waste treatment technologies, including a
gasification unit located at North Carolina State University's "Animal and Poultry Waste
Management Center" on Lake Wheeler Road. We plan to run several batches of
candidate feedstock through this machine, including swine, cattle and poultry manure.
As we discussed, we intend to collect the separated cattle manure for this test project
from the Kingsmill Farm located in Liberty, NC (Randolph County). Our plan would be
to transport to NCSU enough waste to accommodate approximately 2.5 days of
gasification tests. While we do not yet know this required tonnage with certainty, we
expect that approximately one to two tons would need to be transported in several loads.
Our hope would be to transport the waste beginning the week of January 19, 2008.
When we discussed waste transport permitting requirements, you suggested that we first
check Kingsmill's approved Waste Management Plan (WMP), and to then request, #nEast Hargett Street
amendment from you if the WMP appeared not to adequately cover this typ of off ite Suite 300
tal"eigfi` t�odn Carolina 27601
ecocurrent.com
919.743.2520 t
919.743.2501 f

Eco Current
transportation. I have attached three pages from Kingsmill's WMP provided to me by the
farm operator. By my reading, the final sentence of the 2" a -to -last paragraph (page 3)
suggests that the activities described above would not be covered by the existing WMP:
"Currently no waste is designated for offsite use or treatment."
If my reading is correct, we would like to request your assistance in amending the
existing Kingsmill WMP, as appropriate, to accommodate the test project described
above. Please contact me at any time if you have any questions or require additional
information. Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Jason Tundermann
jtundermann6lecocurrent.com
919.802.51 b0
Cc: E. Phillip Wright, Kingsmill Farm
Eric Tillett, EcoCurrent
T. Barker Dameron, EcoCurrent
111 East Hargett Street
Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
ecocurrent.com
919.743.2520 t
919.743.2501 f

1�1
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
04-17-2008
This plan has been prepared for:
Kings Mill DCF
.Everett Phillip Wright
4105 meredell Furm Rd
liberty, AIC 272.98
[phone]
This plan has been developed by:
Randy Blackwood
USDA-IRCS
Asheboro Field Office
241 Sunset Avenue
Suite 105, Fed. Bldg.
Asheboro, NC 2720.3
(336)�09-4449 — 4 '
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or pr =!r) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: y--f"lil Da
Technical Specialist Signature ate
........................................................... .... ..... ... --•1............ ............ ----- ---...............
563606 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-17.2008 Cover Page 1
11

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
U2
Solids - calculated waste generated 29,600.00 tons/near by a 2.000 animal Dairy (Milk
Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
78999
Incorporated
104 720
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Max. AvaiL
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
78,999
192409
-1 13,410
72,093.07
-42,493.07
U3
Liquids - calculated waste generated 8,786,600 gals/year by a 2,000 animal Dairy (Milk
Co,vv) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste storage
Capacities of approximately 104 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
14679
Incorporated
20017
Infected
22686
Irrigated
13345
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplusl
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gal ions)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
13,345
45734
-32,389
30,112,296
-21,325,696
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of MRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for ModiNina a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
........................................................................................................................................................
Note: In source 1D, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
` Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
724500 Database Version 3A Date Printed: 04-18.2008 Source rage fare 1 of l

L..J
Narrative
2616 cf x 62 Ibs/cf = 162;19'' lbs / 2000 lbs/ton = 81.1 tons/day'x 365 = 29.600 tonsiyear
Liquids generated:
(.37cf x 1600hd) � (.25 cf x 400 lid x .5) + 1872 + 364.3 i 340 = 3.218.3 cf/day
3,218.3 cf/day x 7.49 gal/cf = 24,073 gal/day x 365,days = 8,786,603 gal/year
Cummulative daily additions: cuff
3,258 (dairy/dry R. heifer) + 1,8 71 (washwater) - 364 (rain) � 340 (24hr storm) = 5.833 cf/day
Volume generated for 104 days: 5,833 cf'x 104 day= 606.632 cult
Storage volume - 61 1.968 tuft
Calculated volume (104 days) - 606,632 tuft
Available storage balance - 5.336 tuft
5,336 tuft x 7.48 gal/cuff = 39,913 gals/day
39.913 gal/day x 365 days = 14,568,347 gals/year
Acre Calculations:
Wettable acres for tract 4471 derived from waste plan created by Environmental Engineering Services
dated 6/5/2001, Though farm is under new management existing pull locations and acres treated remain
the same.
All acres on all tracts re -calculated using 2004 ortho-imagery for delineating field boundaries.
PLAT completed on all fields in plan - 8/21'2006.
Acres required for land application = 589 acres. This number is derived by adding the PAID for each
field/crop until the PAN produced by the farm is reached. It is worth noting that the �VUP has almost
300 acres surplus for waste application. This 589 acres represents the land needed for waste application
assuming, ALL waste produced by the dairy is land applied. Currently no waste is designated for offsite
use or treatment.
Amendment for: 4/17/2008. The following, tracts have been added to the CNMP for the application of
solid waste via a honey -wagon. These tracts are being added prior to application but no soil samples
have yet been attained. The plan is using default PAN values and application rates until soil samples,
RUSLE and PLAT can be completed. Due to substantial increases in commercial fertilize in recent
months many landowners are approaching the dairy and requesting manure in lieu of fertilize, Because
no manure has been applied to these fields in past years using the default PAN and RYE values for each
724500 Database Version 3.1 matt Primed: G4-18-2008 Narrative Page Page 2 of 3

T f;
Re: c pges, o 76/60
subject: Re: changes to 76/60
From: kevin clemmer <kcclemmc®yahoo.cotn>
Date: sun, 27 Ad 2008 11:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: [e-mail]
CC: kcclemtneQayahoo.com
Hope you are doing well. I will send corrected files via a separate email as they will not attach. I will
address your questions below in underlining/red behind each question.....
On the "small grains/hay irrigated land" records:
1. Please specify from which waste pond the waste was taken. Just listing "lagoon" under nutrient
source is not sufficient.
Have corrected
2. The IRR-2 forms for Field 4 Hydrant 7 and Field 6 Hydrant 17 were blank. Was this intentional?
YES; hay piles in this area
3. Over -application of PAN occurred on Field 2 Hydrants 913, IOB, and 11 (79.58 lbs. over!!)
Pull 2 occurred to human error; Should this N requirement be deducted from next crop??????
and Field 4 Hydrants 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A, and 8.
Since the over -applications occurred as a result of the second application for the season, please explain
how too much PAN was applied.
Over app.- occured because change in PAN # used(from first meeting)
On the "Slurry Corn 2008" records:
1. Tract 3515 Fields 2 and 3 received manure but are not in the waste plan (4/17/08 version). You need
to contact your tech specialist to have these fields added to the waste plan immediately!
Has been addressed w/phone calls; no paper work in hand
2. Again, from which waste pond was the manure taken?
Have corrected
On the "Slurry Corn 2007" records:
1. The applications onto Tract 3515 Fields 1, 2, & 3 are dated for January 14, 2008. Is this supposed to
be 2007 or 2008?
Have corrected; 2008 pasture application
2. Again, fields 2 & 3, above are not in the waste plan.
Has been addressed w/phone calls; no paper work in hand
3. I was under the impression that you were keeping the PAN for hay by the calendar year ... V If so,
you need separate SLUR-2 fom rs for Tract 7813 Fields 1-7. The form submitted to me has both June
2007 and January 2008 applications. Please revise as necessary.
Correct; have done...
4. Tract 4380 Field 1 is listed on the SLUR-2 form but listed under Tract 9347 Field 1 tab on the
attachment. Which one is correct? Please revise. Also, the crop is hay and the year is 2008. This doesn't
seem like it should go under "Slurry corn 2007 records."
9347• corrected
5. In the "slurry corn 2007" records you've got January 2008 applications onto small grain (Tract 4380
Fields 3 & 5). Is this correct?
YES; crop was small grain and planted in'07
Same issue for tract 4463 Fields 1 & 3. Please explain.
YES; crop was small grain and planted in'07
t of 2 7/29/2008 8:48 AM

Re: changes to 76/60
i •
6. In the "slurry com 2007" records you've got January 2008 applications onto pasture (Tract 4456
Field 2). Is this correct.
NO; have corrected
There will be blanks for other fields as no manure has been applied BUT left this way for applications
in the future..... Easier for doing the computer way.
THANKS
These are most of the concerns If you would revise and straighten -out these records as soon as possible
it will help both you and Phillip in the future. if you have questions regarding record keeping I'm sure
Cindy, Randy, Joe or I can help you.
Melissa
Melissa Rosebrock Environmental Specialist NC DENR Winston-Salem F
On 7/7/2008 9:27 PM, kevin clernmer wrote:
ontent-Type: — —application/octet•stream
Slurry Corn 2007.sls CContent-Encoding: base64
Small grains, bay Irrigated Land.:is Conteat-Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
Content -Encoding: base64
Slurry Corn 200BAb I Content -Type: applicationtoctet-stream
Content-Encoding:base64
2 of 2 7/29/2008 8:48 AM

/ F 4 9,
n r F'; be.r �lu� JGo
itJ/iQ _k'Q._O r -14±& / � l y/17'�%r i�GR�!� QIUC._ 1!1. J�►_Q_
7 g- t—
9" Ch ,•s copy e f Co��o.51—e
& ke�l7_G_0 6 D
LA bye#'
ck � I_333
Q
or ryo

Waste Code.,
-NH4
SSD
-AI03
Na Ni Cd Pb At Se U PH
SS ON DAM
CCE% ALE(tons)
Dziry Surface kmed
Urea
Se Li -
Waste Code:
-NH4
r !:d
7C. was
Urea
ir
coff di
is hi fhe'o�,4 PhniS

age00 Michael F. Easley, Governor
WarFRQG
❑-'C
Mr. Everett P. Wright
Kings Mill DCF, LLC
4105 Meredell Farm Road
Liberty, NC 27298
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Collen Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
November 20, 2007
SUBJECT: Kinlg's Mill DCF, LLC —Response to Show Cause Letter
Facility Number: 76-60, Randolph County
Dear Mr. Wright,
Our office has reviewed the responses from both you and Brian Souther (commercial applicator
for King's Mill DCF, LLC.) following the Show Cause Meeting held at the Division of Water Quality's
Winston-Salem Regional Office. As stated in your letters, both you and Mr. Souther intend to review the
application requirements contained in the permit and waste management plan prior to any waste
application events. Our office also concurs with your intentions to evaluate the site and determine
appropriate set -back (especially any new fields) with the hauler prior to the application of animal waste
and to "inspect the site at least twice during the day to make certain that proper procedures are followed."
It is our belief that the ,above measures, if followed routinely, will ensure that animal waste is
applied per the animal waste permit. The Division considers this matter "closed" with no plans to pursue
further action.
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight
Aquifer Protection Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
cc: APS -Central Files andiW,SRO Files
Mr. Jerry Rimmer (Supervisor, Technical Assistance and Certification Unit)
DWQ - APS-Animal Feeding Operations Unit
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street; Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Phone [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Internet: www.nowaterquality.org Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Avtfr
AgrMaste Technology, Inc.
5400 Etta Burke Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.agriwaste.com.
Email: [e-mail]
Mr. Todd Bennett
Environmental Engineer III
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
Aquifer Protection Unit
2728 Capital Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Engineer's Certification for Solids Removal Module
Permit No. AWI760060
Kings Mill DCF, LLC
Innovative Animal Waste Management System
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Bennett,
/e t:ss,
q/-Z.0 F
- R@CEIV, ED .
N.C. Dept, of ENR
SEP 2 6 2007
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
August 30, 2007
Enclosed, please find the Engineer's Certification for the Solids Removal Module of the Second Generation
Super Soil Innovative Technology system constructed at the David C. Falk Dairy located in Randolph
County. This certification is being submitted based on a visual inspection of the installed components. The
following components are installed and were inspected:
- Flush lane
- Sewer Chewer installed in vault
- Pump tank with dual pumps
- Homogenization tank with dual mixers
- Solids removal press
- Separated water vault (to be used in future)
- Separated solids conveyors
- Compost turning unit
- Concrete pad for solids curing
"Concepts in Agricultural Byproduct Utilization"

Based on my observation, the construction has been in accordance with the original design and
specifications and the granted permit. As the installed construction meets the original construction
drawings, as -built drawings have not been devel6ped.
Thank you for your assistance with this certification and if there are any questions, please feel free to
contact me at 919-859-0669 or via email at [e-mail].
Sincerely;
Kevin D. Davidson, P.E.
Sr. Project Engineer.
2

i•.:
_Kevin D. Davidson , as a duly registered-Pfo£essional'Engineevin:the, State of
North Carolina, having been authorized to.observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the
rOJeCt Solids Removal Module• - Secbnd'Generation Super Soil_ Innovative Technology
construction OtthC
Project Name
Kings -Mill DCF, LLC Randolph County,�orth Carolina
Location
for the Permittee hereby state that,! -to; the best: of>my:Abilities,Aue care;andAffigence,was used in
the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of this Permit, the approved plans and, specifications; and other
supporting materials.
Signature Registration No. O z Li 5 8 Z
Date 8/30/07
Construction Inspection completed after installation of solids removal components.
See attached cover letter. Construction in accordance with design drawings and specifications.
`% 0111111110#111
OM
[Z Z
���ral� � ncAA`•
9/3 C/a;�

dw
N
Grassy Knob Farms
C/o 125 Fort Valley Court Statesville, North Carolina 28625
704 450-8363 704 883-0511 Fax
September 21, 2007
Ms. Sherri V. Knight
Aquifer Protection Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem NC 27107-2241
SUBJECT: Written response to "close" the matter of June 8, 2007.
Dear Ms. Knight,
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept of ENR
SEP 2 7 2007
Wiastch-4a wn r
RegkmW ORke I
Thank you for your letter acknowledging our honesty and candidness in
answering the Divisions questions about the events of June 8, 2007 and for realizing
that nothing was willfully or intentionally done to bring about the initial inspection.
While we maintain our insistence that no waters of North Carolina were
contaminated or trespassed upon and therefore there was never a violation at all.
We have taken it upon ourselves to voluntarily address the five points in your letter.
1. We will request to view a copy of a facilities waste plan to ensure proper
application of waste.
2. Any new application sites will be previewed before application.;-
3. We will continue to provide as we always have, adequate training of
persons applying waste.
4. We will request the facilities OiC inspect the application sites.
5. We will continue to supervise our operation.
We apologize for the inspector being called out for fraudulently being told that
waste had been allowed to be in the creek. We were glad that our operators applied
waste so professionally that even though some buffers were inadequate, absolutely
no waste was in danger of reaching the creek.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to bring this matter to a close.
Sincerely,
I
Grassy Knob Farms
Brian Souther

ti
00
••
Sherri V. Knight
Division of Water Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
September 4, 2007
Re: Written Response from Facility Number 76-60, Randolph County
Dear Ms. Knight,
~ RECEIVED
Dept of ENR
sEP 0 5'2007
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
This letter contains my corrective action responses to the factors that you listed in your letter as having led
to the improper application of animal waste.
1, Inadequate knowledge and understanding of the waste plan and permit requirements by the Operator in
Charge (OIC) and contract applicator.
Response — Brian Southern (contract applicator) and I (Operator in Charge) will review King's Mill
waste management plan and the permit before applying waste.
2. An unfamiliar land application site
Response — Brian Southern and I will ride over the application site together prior to applying waste.
We will locate all creeks, waterways, and ponds and agree upon the proper set back.
3. Inadequate training of the persons performing the actual application of waste
Response -- I will routinely meet with the contract applicator prior to application of waste to review the
waste management plan and to review the proper set back on all fields.
4. Inadequate supervision and follow-up by the facility's OIC
Response — When the contractor is applying waste, I will meet with the contractor before he begins
applying waste and I will check on the contractor at least two times during the day to make certain
proper procedures are followed.
5. Inadequate supervision and follow-up by the contract applicator
Response — When applying waste, 1 will routinely visit the fields to check on the contract applicator
and to make certain the contract applicator is present and supervising his employees.
1 sincerely hope that you will find these responses adequate.
Thank you, /
Eve�Prigt

�OF WAr�94
�O G
0) r-
7
a �
Mr. Brian K. Souther
125 Fort Valley Court
Statesville, NC 28625
0 Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
August 30, 2007
SUBJECT: Show Cause Meeting: Kings Mill DCF, LLC
Facility Number: 76-60, Randolph County
Dear Mr. Souther,
Collen Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Thank you for taking the time to meet with us to discuss the status of your animal waste operator
certification. Your candidness and honesty in answering the Division's questions regarding the
application events of June 8, 2007 was greatly appreciated. As communicated during our meeting, we
believe that there were several factors that led to the improper application of animal waste:
1. Inadequate knowledge and understanding of the waste plan and permit requirements by the
Operator in Charge (OIC) and contract applicator.
2. An unfamiliar land application site(s).
3. Inadequate training of those persons performing the actual application of waste.
4. Inadequate supervision and follow-up by the facility's OIC.
5. Inadequate supervision and follow-up by the contract applicator.
While we do not believe the above actions to have been committed willfully or intentionally, our
investigation concludes that the violations were a result of Negligence, insufficient management, and lack
of experience by persons involved in applying animal waste. Your willingness during the Show Cause
Meeting to make the necessary changes to resolve these concerns was noted by Division staff.
As such, this office requests that you review your operational procedures and provide a written
response within 30 days as to how you propose to address each of the five factors listed above. You may
wish to consider developing a series of checklists or a written field -training guide, implementing
competency requirements, modifying application techniques, or increasing the training requirements for
your employees. Your response should be sent to my attention at the address contained in this letterhead.
Upon receipt of a satisfactory written response, the Division will consider this matter "closed" with no
plans to pursue further action at this time.
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight
Aquifer Protection Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
cc: APS - Central Files and WSRO Files
Mr. Jerry Rimmer (Supervisor, Technical Assistance and Certification Unit)
DWQ - APS-Animal Feeding Operations Unit
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street; Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Phone [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Internet: WWW.ncwaterquality.org Fax [phone]
An Equal opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer -- 50% Recycled/l 0% Post Consumer Paper

Name of Permittee:
Owner:
Facility Number:
Type of Operation:
County:
OIC:
Contracted OIC:
Kings Mill Show Cause Meeting
W SRO
July 26, 2007 —10:00 AM
Kings Mill DCF, LLC
Mr. David Faulk
76-60
State Cattle Permit for 400 dairy heifers and 1600 milk cows and
Innovative Permit for Super Soils System
Randolph
Mr. Everette P. Wright (Phillip)
Mr. Brian K. Souther of Grassy Knob Farms
Incident History: Complaint investigation by DWQ on June 8, 2007 resulted in NOV
for failure to abide by the CAWMP and the Cattle Waste Management
Permit. Animal waste was applied to within 5-20 feet of Sandy Creek
(class WS-III) in tract 4539 off Sandy Creek Church Road. Animal
waste was also applied to within 150 feet of two dwellings (not owned
by the permittee) in the same tract.
Immediate action: Mr. Wright was contacted immediately after DWQ received
complaint. At Ms. Rosebrock's request, both Mr. Wright and Mr.
Souther met with Ms. Rosebrock on site and were present during the
investigation. Mr. Wright instructed someone to disk -in a 25-foot
swath of the application field adjoining Sandy within five hours of
DWQ's visit. This was completed prior to any rain events. No waste
was observed in the stream at the time of the investigation.

• 0
00
Part'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
E-1-t
G�, r nJ G CI 0 vJ
WSRO Show Cause Meeting
Kings Mill DCF, LLC
7/26/07 10:00 AM
DWQ - WSOed
-p W g -- Lis fz c?
kcv►e
a
nw

so
so
Construction Review
Facility No. 76-060
Christine Blanton, FRO
7124/07
A meeting was held at the Kingsmill Farm in Randolph County on Friday, July 20, 2007. In attendance
were: Ray Campbell, Christine Blanton,
Jason Bochert, and Melissa Rosebrock. We first reviewed the
original construction plans and the permit, AWI760060. As a result of this discussion and visual
inspection, it was determined the following items are either under construction or complete.
Component
Status
Initial Storage Trough
Existing
Sewer Chewer
Installed
12,000 Gal. Lift Station
Installed
Homogenization Tank
Installed
Separator Unit
In place, build enclosure under construction
Separator Effluent Tank
Installed (this is a small lift/pump tank, not the 218,581 gal. tank)
Solids Composter
In place (1 of 3)
50'x100' concrete curing pad
Ground has been graded, pad has not been poured
I feel that the concrete curing pad should be in place prior to operation. Dr. Campbell indicated
the curing pad was only for compost that will be sent off site, but for now all compost will be used as
bedding materials onsite. We again discussed the need for a Residuals Permit prior to sending any
material offsite; Melissa offered to provide a copy of the application. Note: Additional grading work or a
storm drain inlet is needed to prevent storm water from flowing into compost curing area.
No equipment for further treatment of liquids has been installed. It is my understanding that the
Owner wishes to delay installation of the liquid treatment system until a later time and only operate the
solids removal/compost system. The Separator Effluent Tank that is in place will be utilized to slowly
decant this liquid to the existing lagoon and to pump any films remaining from the separation process
back to the homogenization tank. As the permit was written for the entire system, I am unclear how the
partial installation will relate to operational approval.
We reminded Dr. Campbell of permit requirements including As -Built Plans submission, and
notification of the Winston-Salem Regional Office prior to operation. While on -site we observed that
SuperSoils was preparing to test various components of the system. Finally, we discussed monitoring
and reporting requirements. Dr. Campbell indicated SuperSoils does not have operational responsibilities
but intends to train the owner to do all monitoring and sampling.
In summary, the innovative system is not quite operational, but should be in the very near future,
One additional item to note: Melissa observed that leachate from the silo outfalls into a ditch that
goes directly into the onsite freshwater pond. While one silo is less than % capacity, the potential
currently exists to significantly affect the BOD, DO, pH, nutrient content, etc of this water body and the
receiving surface waters. It was stated that SuperSoils plans to use this pond as a freshwater source in
the composting process. Both Melissa and I feel that this would bring variability and perhaps instability to
the process, particularly if/when both silos are refilled. Photographs were taken and are available.

�0F W A TF9p
�o �
o �
CERTIFIED MAIL NO.7006 2150 0002 2066 9828
fRD fli:fT3Lej011W1a:IRolil*19041
Mr. Everett P. Wright
Kings Mill DCF, LLC
4105 Meredell Farm Road
Liberty, NC 27298
C�7-�1�7u%�R►`C��71II.Ti�FjlIlillfyl►�ILTZ�:�t�
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
Mr. Brian K. Souther
Grassy Knob Farms
125 Fort Valley Court
Statesville, NC 28625
SUBJECT: Show Cause Meeting
• • Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 5, 2007
Certification #: AWB 21333 (Wright) and AWB21637 (Souther) .
Permittee: Kings Mill DCF, LLC
Facility #: 767-60
Randolph County, f
_ 7•s .` is . � �r f..,l! . 'f, ;-��. F'. �! r 1- ;3.:" .._ i�• .I �.T.. .t-• .'1 ,. !.
Dear Messrs. Wright and Souther,
As a result of an application site inspection that was conducted June 8, 2007 you are hereby
requested to attend a meeting to be held at the Winston-Salem Regional Office on July 26, 2007 at 10:00
AM. This meeting is to allow you an opportunity .to explain the conditions observed in the receiving
fields on the above date. As you recall, animal waste was improperly applied to land (to be planted in
soybeans) in Tract-4539 along Sandy Creek Church Road. On -site observations and photographs
document that animal waste was land applied to within 5-20 feet of Sandy Creek. The section of Sandy
Creek in question is classified by the State as a Water Supply (WS) III. Additionally, animal waste was
incorrectly applied within 150 feet of two dwellings not owned by the permittee. .
The responsibilities given the possessor. of a certificate to operate an animal waste facility are not
inconsequential; your contribution in the protection of the permittee's investment .in the facility and in
the adherence to water quality regulations should be, and is expected to be, considerable. To that end,
the State has adopted.,various rules and regulations specifying the responsibility of animal waste
operators.
15A NC Administrative Code 8F .0203 states that the Operator in Charge (OIC) or a designated
back-up OIC of a Type B Animal Waste Management System shall inspect, or a person under the
supervision of an OIC„or,designated back-up OIC shall inspect the land application site as often as,
necessary to insure that the animal waste is land applied in accordance with the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP). "Person under the supervision of an Operator in Charge" means a person
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street; Winston-Salem, NC 27107' Phone [phone]M P
Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Internet: www.newaterquality.org Fax [phone]

Wayne Buttke/Michael Souther
July 5, 2007
Page 2
who takes directions from the OIC and who may only land, apply animal waste when the OIC is
available for consultation and advice at any time during the application of animal waste.
NC General Statute 90A-41 provides for suspension or revocation of an operator's certificate, or
the issuance of a written reprimand to an animal waste operator. Additionally, the Water Pollution
Control System Operators Certification Commission, in accordance with the procedure set forth in
Chapter 150B of the NC General Statutes, may take such action when it finds that the operator has
practiced fraud or deception; that reasonable care, judgment, or the application of knowledge or ability
was not used in the performance of duties; or that the operator is incompetent or unable to perform his or
her duties. In addition to revocation of a certificate, the Commission may levy a civil penalty of up to
$1,000 per violation, for a willful violation of part 90A-47. l' of the General Statutes.
Upon receipt of this letter, please contact our office to confirm your willingness to comply with
our request for a Show -Cause Meeting at the scheduled date and time. Directions to the Department's
Winston-Salem Regional Office are attached for your convenience. Should you have questions
regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Melissa Rosebrock or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Aw:k.
k,�V-
Sherri V. Knight
Aquifer Protection Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Attachment
cc: Mr. Jerry Rimmer - Supervisor, Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Mr. Arlin Buttke — President, Buttke Dairy Enterprises
Randolph County SWCD/NRCS
s APS - Central Files
WSRO Files

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mail
Postag
LISPSe &Fees Paid
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NCDENR-Water Quality Section
YX - ecu bed
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27I07
Aquifer Protection

■ Complete hems 7, 2, and S. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach thi"card to the back of the mailpiece, P
or on the front If space permits.
1. Article Addre sed to:
Mr. BrianrK. Souther
Grassy Knob Farms
125 Fort Valley Court
Statesville, NC 28625
i
A. Signature
X ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by ( Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. �Type ed Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered] Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Insured Mall ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
- 700�2510 0002 2066 9835
1,'February 21744 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1541

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete .
Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
' .7 — —
i Mr. Everette P. Wright" -
Kings Mill DCF, LLC
4105 Meredeil Farm Road
Liberty, NC 27298
A. Signature
p�-Q •�.eLl� l'�/1L O Aden
X
❑ Addressee
B. Received by ( Printed Name) C. Date of D " ery
D. Is delivery address differen from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Se ce Type
Certified Malt ❑ Fpress Mall
- Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mall C.O.D.
H W 6 a 1 L 3 l oj& 1 4. Restricted Delivery? (Fxfra Fee) ❑ Yes
7004 ' 2510` Q08 2066 9828 • "PS 50Y)
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 10259e-02-14_15aa

UNITED ST�1OStVI ,.
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NCDENR-Water Quality Section
I" . Labtw-L
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
a

02
i
� r
O '[
June 13, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7004 2510 0002 2066 9781
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Phillip Wright
Kings Mill DCF, LLC
4105 Meredell Farm Road
Liberty, NC 27298
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North C*epartment of Environment and Natural Resources
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION - Permit Condition Violation
Certificate of Coverage 4NCA376060, Facility 976-60
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Wright:
Alan W. Klimek, A.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
This letter is to summarize the water quality violations observed during 'a complaint investigation
conducted by Division of Water Quality (DWQ) staff on June 8, 2007. This investigation was conducted as a
result of a complaint ' received by our office alleging "the application of animal waste too close to surface
waters."
Staff observed that animal waste had, in fact, been applied to within 5-20' of Sandy Creek in Tract 4539
off Sandy Creek Church Road in Randolph County. This particular section of Sandy Creek is classified by the
State as a Water Supply 111. Staff also documented that animal waste was applied to within 150' of two
dwellings as well. As discussed, your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) states that animal
waste is NOT to be applied closer than 25' to perennial waters and within 200' of a dwelling not owned by the
permittee. Failure to abide by the CAWMP is a violation of condition 1.3. of the Cattle Waste
Management System General NPDES Permit.
Our office wishes to thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Our records indicate that a 25'
swath of land adjoining Sandy Creek was disked -in within five hours of our visit to reduce the potential for run-
off during a rain event. It is our understanding that soybeans are to be planted in this tract immediately.
Your continued attention to the waste application activities at Kings Mill DCF, LLC is greatly
appreciated. If you have questions concerning. this Notice, please contact Melissa_ Rosebrock or me at (336)
771-5000.
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
cc: Todd Bennett -- APS Animal Feeding Operations Unit
Randolph County SWCD/NRCS
�WSRO_TaciIH37-Files
Central Files
N.C. Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Phone: [phone] pax: [phone]
N& Carolina
Nturally
Customer Service 1(800) 623-7748
11• .-T0

IT
Mwlw
UNITED .4
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NCDENR-Water Quality Section
AMuifer�P7rot7ectonm.
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
I

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired.
■ F t your name and address on the reverse
s4 ..hat we can return the card to you.
■ A' ich this card to the hack of the mailpiece,
c :)n the fmht if space permits.
1. ' icle Addressed to:
N
Mr. Phillip Wright
Kings Mill DCF, LLC
4105 IVMeredell Farm Road
Liberty, NC 27298
17 Agent
© Addre
C. Datek of Del
D. is delivery address dMerertl from item 1? u Y&
if YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
� 3. $Qrvice Type
ertitied Mail
(❑��RC egistered
❑ Insured Mall
NaExpress Mall
Return Recelpt for Merchandise
C.Q.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Feel ❑ Yes
2. Article Nurnher rt - .:,t, -T ; t + 't f ` [ 13 Nov
V Y
(Tr _ 7004 2510 r0402 2a66' 9781 o/'
f?S F e mart' 004 i , .Domestic Retum Receipt I ,� D 7 -^02M5-D2-W1MO

1 •
•ision of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 750060 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA376060 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Comolaint County: &ndoloh I Region:Whston-SaleM
Date of Visit: 06/08/2007 Entry Time: 12:30 PE4 Exit Time: 02:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Kings Mill DCF. LLC Owner Email:
Owner: David Falk Phone: -
Mailing Address: 4105 Meredall Farm Rd LihedyNQ Zj298
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°51'22Longitude: 79°38'27"
Farm address: 4718 Ramseur- Julian Road, Liberty, NCUS Hwy 421 south from GSO. Right onto Old Liberty Rd. Right onto
Ramseur -Julian Rd. Farm is on right,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Application
Certified Operator: Everett P Wright Operator Certification Number: 21333
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(e): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Phillip Wright Phone:
24 hour contact name Phillip Wright Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
BIRO
Page: 1

Permit: NCA376060 Owner - Facility: David Falk Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 06/08/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Inspection Summary:
Today's inspection was the result of a complaint first received by the Randolph Co. SWCDINRCS office on 617/07. Complaintant
alleged that waste was applied too close to surface waters on Tract-4539 on Sandy Creek Church Road.
Application field is owned by James Kivett of 5090 Sandy Creek Church Road. Complaintant is Earl York, Jr. who lives at 3119
Ramseur -Julian Road. His phone number is 336.824,8454.
Phillip Wright (Kings Mill OIC)and Brian Souther (contract animal waste applicator) met me at entrance to field near Mr. Kivett's
residence and vie inspected all the field borders and ditches and streams on this tract.
Permit (and CAWMP) states that waste is not to be applied within 200' of a dwelling not owned by the landowner, nor within 100' to a
well, and no closer than 25' to perennial waters.
Waste was documented to have been applied within 150' of Mr. Kivett's home and within 150' of another dwelling (on an adjacent field
in the same tract) owned by someone else. Waste was also observed to have been applied within 5'-20' of surface waters in several
Instances. No animal waste was observed in the stream or drainageways.
Mr. Wright was instructed to disk -in the waste along the drainageways and streams prior to a rain event and no later than 24 hours. I
spoke with Phillip Wright on 6/11/07 and he stated that the 25' swath closest to the streams and drainageways was disk in by 7pm on
618/07 and no rain events have occurred since the waste was applied.
Page: 2

Permit: NCA376060 Owner - Facility: David Falk Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 06/08/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste Structures
TYDe Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Waste Pond
LARGE WSP #3
Waste Pond
LOWER STAGE #2
aste Pond
UPPER STAGE #1
Page: 3

Permit: NCA376060 Owner - FaclIIty: David Falk
Facility Number;
760060
Inspection Date: 06/08/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Complaint
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge; reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
D
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ■
❑
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
■
❑
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
■
.❑
❑
Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/'10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area? ■
Crop Type 1 Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Page: 4

. •
Permit: NCA376060 Owner - Facility: David Falk Facility Number: 760060
Inspection bate: 06/08/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

'ivy •t .'A v, � . (�' I �.� � _ .� i7 r%U 'i.' w
aoo
�? _d._. a � � .. .ir('�t7�:1, C1. .. r^ '1'�� 'hY� � rllil�*.1 :?�,rY �i'{•.t k l�"^l: �i .�' stt'�i ss�:i�=11 l} �,_ _.

Name of Stream
Description 0
Curr. Class Date Prop. Class'— Basin - Stream Index #
DEEP RIVER
From dam at Randleman
C
04/01/99
Cape
Fear
17-(10.5)
Lake to Grassy Creek
Polecat Creek
From source to a point
WS-III
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
17-11-(1)
0.4 mile downstream of
Randolph County SR 2116
Little Polecat
From source to Polecat
WS-III;HQW
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
17-11-3
Creek
Creek
Polecat Creek
From a point 0.4 mile
WS-III;CA
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
17-11-(3.5)
downstream of Randolph
County SR 2216 to dam
at Randleman water
supply reservoir
Bull Run
From source to a point
WS-III,B
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
17-11-4-(1)
0.3 mile downstream of
Randolph County SR 2111
Bull Run
From a point 0.3 mile
WS-III,B;CA08/03/92
Cape
Fear
17-11-4-(2)
downstream of Randolph
County SR 2111 to
Polecat Creek
Polecat Creek
From dam at Randleman's
C
04/01/59
Cape
Fear
17-11-(5)
water supply to Deep
River
Haskett Creek
From source to Deep
C
03/01/77
Cape
Fear
17-12
River
Penwood Branch
From source to Haskett
C
04/01/82 w
Cape
Fear
17-12-1
Creek
Gabriels Creek
From source to Deep
C
09/01/74
Cape
Fear
17-14
River
Bush Creek
From source to Deep
C
04/01/59
Cape
Fear
17-15
River
Sandy Creek
From source to a point
WS-II
08/03/9.2�
Cape
Fear
17-16-(1)
0 , 6 mile upstream of
`Y•' _
N.C. Hwy. 22
Dodsons Lake
Entire lake and
WS-III
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
17-16-2
connecting stream to
Sandy Creek
Boodom Creek
From source to Sandy
WS-III
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
17-16-2.5
Creek
Mount Pleasant
From source to Sandy
WS-III
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
17-16-3
Creek
Creek
Landy_Creek
From a point 0.6 mile
WS-III;CA
08/03/92
Cape
Fear
17-16-(3.5)
—� -
upstream of N.C. Hwy.
22 to Ramseur water
supply
Sandy Creek
From dam at Ramseur's
C
07/01/73
Cape
Fear
17-16-(4)
water supply to Deep
River
Reed Creek
From source to Deep
C
09/01/74
Cape
Fear
17-17
River
Page 2 of 7

Re- k ijnill - AWI760060
i of2
Subject: Re: Kingsmill - AW1760060
From: Todd Bennett <todd.bennett@ncmaiLnet>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:09:49 -0400
To: [e-mail]
CC: Christine Blanton <[e-mail]>
Sounds great. Thanks, ladies!
Todd
Melissa Rosebrock wrote:
Todd,
Sounds fine with me, too. I have been working with Christine regarding what I
wanted to see in the materials submitted and those concerns have been addressed.
Christine and I decided that she -would be the contact for the review and
submittal to reduce confusion. (I enjoyed working with you, Christine!). Her
summary reflects the concerns and recommendations for both of us.
Melissa
Melissa Rosebrock
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
on 5/2/2007 4:24 PM, Christine Blanton wrote:
Todd,
In reviewing the Innovative Animal Waste Management System Permit
Application, I have taken the following steps:
* reviewed application materials including innovative system
narratives, maps, schematics, Waste Utilization Plan, etc.
* conducted site visit along with Melissa Rosebrock to evaluate
the feasibility of an innovative system on this site
* requested additional information/clarification from the applicant
* reviewed'supplemental documentation.
Based on the information available, I feel that the application is
complete and meets all our requirements for permit issuance. I make this
statement with a few caveats:
1. The applicant should be reminded in permit documentation that
no waste materials, composted/treated or not may be utilized
off -site with out a Residuals Permit. I have made Ray
Campbell is aware of this requirement via phone conversations
and through e-mail communications with him. He has assured me
that it will be some time before there is enough excess
material to consider off -site uses.
2. All email communications or responses from Mr. Campbell should
be included in the supplemental documentation to the permit
application - not just the revised documents.
3. The revised permit application that I received via email does
not have original signatures (obviously). If you need hard
copies with original signatures, you will have to get that from
Mr. Campbell directly.
4. I think that we should be notified prior to construction so
that I may make myself available to perform site visits as needed.
If you have any questions or need any additional information from me,
1I
5/2/2007 5:53 PM /I

Re- Kinghill - AWI760060
please do not hesitate to contact me.
*/Christine Blanton/*
•
Todd A. Bennett
Environmental Engineer
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
Aquifer Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-715-6627 (office)
919-715-6048 (fax)
LOCld. bennet:t@ncma:i.:l.. net:
2 of2
5/2/2007 5:53 PM /I

IMM\►.T/(INIT111
Subject: Re: AWI670060 ,
f I
From: Melissa Rosebrock <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:23:42 -0400
To: Todd Bennett <todd. bennett@ncmail. net>
CC: Christine Blanton <Christine. B lanton@ncmail. net>, Sherri Knight <[e-mail]>
Hey Todd,
We are waiting on Kings Mill to re -submit a corrected application to address items 1.9, 2.2, and 2.3.
Additionally, they were to revise the narrative section to include:
1) a description/statement of the class of polymer to be used for solids removal (in conversation with
the OIC today, it is to be a food grade polymer).
2) a more thorough explanation of how the solids sterilization is to be accomplished.
The OIC told me that Dr. Cambell was supposed to be submitting all of the above to you. ???
I've also been waiting on "Raleigh" to tell us whether Kings Mill needs a residuals permit for
distribution off site of the composted material. The owner wants to ship the material off -site to be
used in corregated pipe manufacturing and burnt as a fuel. Please find out the answer and let us know.
Thanks.
Hope this addresses your questions. Let me know if you need additional info.
Melissa
Melissa Rosebrock
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Voice: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
On 4/25/2007 12:36 PM, Todd Bennett wrote:
Melissa and Christine,
How are things coming with the King's Mill permit application review? I think I asked for a
response by early to mid April, and here we are at the end (my, how time flies while we're having
fun). Did you send something my way already. If so, I cannot find it now. I knew you had made
a site visit. I know you both have your hands full with things, but if you could let me know where
things stand with it, I would appreciate it. Dr. Campbell called me to check on things this
morning.
Thanks,
Todd
1 of 2
4/25/2007 1:24 PM

David C. Falk, Sr.
Cell: 919-270-1921
February 2, 2007
North Carolina Department of
Environment & Natural Resources
Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
To Whom It May Concern:
i
8-
Mutt ; at trt TI t
GPJXQ.CL .i 'ate.
Mitch Hockett, Ph.D
Cell: 919-247-8727
By signing this letter, I, David C. Falk, Sr., Managing Member of Kingsmill DCF, LLC
and Kingsmill Farm 11, LLC, make, constitute and appoint Phillip Wright my true and
Iawful Attorney -in -Fact, with full right, power, and authority for me and in my name,
place, and stead:
To conduct any and all negotiations and sign any and all documentation associated with
participation in any conservation program that is administered by the United States
Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) on real
estate owned or operated by the undersigned.
Sincerely,
David C. Falk, Sr.
Managing Member
Subscribed to and Sworn before me this 2nd day of February, 2007.
o
CDu
i
Donna D. Key
Commission Expiration: 6/30/2008
5914 Kemp Road, Durham, NC 27703, Email: [e-mail] Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]

I Wayne L. Buttke, Certification Number 22101, am to be relieved of my duties and
responsibilities as Operator -in -Charge of the Ridge Farm, Farm Identification
Number 76-25, by E. Phillip Wright of Kingsmill DCF LLC, Certification Number
21333, by the authority of the undersigned Phillip Ridge on the date of May 25,
2006.
'J/71-4,R. 4A2b�
jo
Sign re of
Relieved Operator
Signature of
Relieving Operator
Signatu e of
Farm Owner
I Wayne L. Buttke, Certification Number 22 10 1, am to be relieved of my duties and
responsibilities as Operator -in -Charge of the Calf Facilities at Buttke Dairy
Enterprises, Farm Identification Number 76-12, by E. Phillip Wright of Kingsmill
DCF LLC, Certification Number 2J333, by the authority of the undersigned Arlin E.
Buttke on the date of May 25, 2006.
4
Sig ure of Signature of
Relieved Operator Relieving Operator
,L- &A
Signature of
Farm Owner

ANIMASACILITY ANNUAL CERTIOATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number jZ,-, I1 3 d b Y:O v County j'g to L 1 a 11 Year 200 L
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) K; S ? ' F L I-C-- _
Operator in Charge for this Facility �7 u of LA, �. /rr �; Certification # 2 133
Land plication of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste
was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I : Facifi Information:
1. Total number of application Fields Q`or Pulls Z(please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): 3j Poi ` - Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
1 -G
2. Total number of Fields EJor Pu1ls.L'1(please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year:.'31 R,i( � Sp ,-1.1, Total Acres on which waste was applied
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit:
5. Estimated arnotint of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year o 31 tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
7.. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest /Z cl 4 _
Smallest �1
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers)
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable:
Part II: Facili Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during ❑ Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03

2. The facility was operated in such Jay that there was no direct runoff of 4 from 2/Yes, ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past D Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during /Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the Lam' Yes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. Yes ❑ No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon VYes ❑ No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification. ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the R/Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
2/Yes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
2/yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
P Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all
��
[?"Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
C Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"i certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the infonnation submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
A
W�
(if different from Permittee)
AFACF 3-14-03 2
Date
1-6 i gg
17
Date

•
DEVICES T09TOMATICALLY STOP IRRIGATION EVENTS
The State of North Carolina has issued NPDES General Permits for animal facilities to operate in North
Carolina. These Permits meet both State and EPA requirements and provide coverage for the following types
of facilities.
NCA200000 (Swine Facilities)
NCA300000 (Cattle Facilities)
NCA400000 (Poultry Facilities with a wet waste management system)
You have recently been issued a Certificate of Coverage (COC) to operate your animal facility under one of
these General Permits.
Condition II. 16. of each of these Permits reads as follows:
Within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the effective date of a COC issued under this permit, the
perminee shall install; operate and maintain devices on all irrigation pumps/equipment designed to
automatically stop irrigation activities during precipitation. This condition does not apply to manure
spreaders or other equipment pulled by manned vehicles.
The permittee will not be required to install, operate and maintain the devices if the permittee commits
to provide for the presence of the OIC or the designated backup OIC at all times during the land
application of waste. This commitment must be submitted in writing to the Division prior to the 120`"
day following the effective date of the COC on a form supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
Please check the box below that indicates your commitment to do one of the following.
❑ Within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the effective date of a COC issued under this permit, I
shall install, operate and maintain devices on all irrigation pumps/equipment designed to automatically
stop irrigation activities during precipitation. This condition does not apply to manure spreaders or other
equipment pulled by manned vehicles.
I will commit to provide for the presence of the Operator in Charge (OIC) or the designated backup OIC
at all times during the land application of waste.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those
persons directly -responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Facility Name i n Y1-i. t I L F14 t1.r► C F Z L-4L— Facility Number �O - 60
Permit Number ke 3 12 Q d b r'?
ame and Title (
Signature of Oper&for in Ch
(if different from Permittee)
lI (":, b
Date
Date -.
DTASIE 3-14-03

•
0.
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan, .,Klimek-jP.E. Director
N _Division,vf Water Quality
December I, 2006 Li;v 111 b t uuu
CERTIFIED MAIL win sto=
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
David Falk
Kings Mill DCF, LLC
4105 Meredall Farm Rd
Liberty, NC 27298
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring NPDES. General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation NPDES General Permits, which expire on
July 1, 2007. Due to changes in federal rules, facilities that do not discharge nor propose to discharge may choose whether or not to
retain coverage under an NPDES General Permit. Copies of the draft animal waste operation NPDES general permits and the State
Non -Discharge General Permits are available at http://h2o.erlr.state,nc.us/aps/afou/down]oads.htm or by writing or calling:
NCDENR—DWQ Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under one of these two types of general permits, you must submit an application for permit
coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a `Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently -Covered by an Expiring
NPDES General Permit.' The application form must be completed and returned by January 2, 2007. Please note, you must include
two 2) copies of your most recent Waste Utilization Plan with the application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the draft general permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel free to contact the
Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-3221.
Sincerely,
Ted L, Bush, Jr., Chief
Aquifer Protection Section
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Randolph County Soil and Water Conservation District
�Vi�n'ston=Salem Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files - 760060
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
lntem& www.newaterqu-,tlity.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Empioyer— 50% Recycledl10°% Post Consumer Paper
Telephone:
Fax I:
Fax 2:
Customer Service:
Nene hCaroI ina
(919) Naturally
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]

ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number V C 3 b County an Year 200-17
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) M 0 f e,
Operator in Charge for this Facility o " py,; I,v �,, jr ; ,� Certification #
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year DOS
YES_ NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste was
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I : Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields ❑ or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): _ 3P P, I 1 �_ Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
2. Total number of Fields V or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) on which land application occurred
during the year: :2— Total Acres on which waste was applied ,
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit: 6 0
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year 0 tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any' one time during the previous year;
Largest7,�
Smallest
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals at
the facility is the annual average numbers)
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable:
Part II: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during 1 Yes []No
the past calendar year.
i

2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from
LDS Yes ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
/
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
El Yes 2 No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
❑ Yes L►d'No
the past calendar year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
❑ Yes D<o
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
����
"
El Yes VNo
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
❑ Yes
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification.
❑ Yes KNo
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
_/
13 YYes ❑ No
11. All required :monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
2Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
_
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
iR' Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
ZYes
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all
❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
D Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate
the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those
persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate,.and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting
false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Title (type or print)
Si nature of Permittee
Signature d OperatR in Charge
(if different from Permittee)
/Date
D

•
•
ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM R E C E 1 V F
N C. Dept. o., i",. -
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number N C &2 b nn D County, � r -2� o�
itil e,r [ j Fg r rr•
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) J f C
Operator in Charge for this Facility JZ-V cr jjg Lj(,4t- Certifi ation # • i Office
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar yearD
YES_ NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste was
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I: Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields ❑ or Pulls 0 (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP):
Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
`r.
2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) on which land application occurred
during the year:
Total Acres on which waste was applied
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit:
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year
tons ❑ or gallons ❑ .(please check the appropriate box)'•
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals at
the facility is the annual average numbers)
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable:
Part II:_Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRiPTION_AS TO WHY -THE FACILITY WAS NOT, COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND�EXPI:AIN CORRECTIVE ACTiON,1TAKENbR PRQPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.' C�}
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during ❑ Yes ❑ No
ru!
the past calendar year.

2. The facility was operated in s91 a way that there was no direct runowaste from ❑ Yes ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past ❑ Yes 0 No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during ❑ Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the ❑ Yes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. ❑ Yes ❑„No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon ❑ Yes ❑ No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification. ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the ❑ Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
[]Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
❑ Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all
❑ Yes El No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
❑ Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or '
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate
the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those
persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting
false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
or
Signature of Permittee
Signatuke of Operator in Charge
(if different from Permittee)
oT
Date
3�/lam-off_
Date

c
o �
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
May 5, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL No. 7004 2510 0002 2066 9538
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Arlin Buttke
Buttke Dairy Enterprises
5796 Walker Mill Road
Randleman, NC 27317
Re: Request for Information
Animal Facility Annual Certification Form
Meredell Farm, 476-60
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Buttke:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
There is a condition in your Animal Waste Management General NPDES Permit addressing the
completion of an annual certification form for your animal feeding operation.
Your NPDES Permit Number NCA376060 Condition 111.12 states:
"An annual certification report shall be filed with the Division's Central Office and appropriate
Regional Office by March 1 of each year for the previous year's activities on forms provided by
the Division. If the facility was not in compliance, the annual certification must be used to
summarize all noncompliance during the previous year, actions taken or actions proposed to be
taken to resolve noncompliance and explain the current compliance status of the facility."
The Division has not received the Animal Facility Annual Certification Form for the year 2004
from your facility. The form was due March 1, 2005. To avoid possible enforcement action for
a violation of your permit, please fill out the attached form, and return it within thirty (30) days
to the following address:
Keith Larick
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Noy Carolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.ennstate.mus 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]

Arlin Bu[tke
Page 2
5/5/2005
PIease be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statue or permitting
requirement.
If you have ,any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Melissa
Rosebrock or me at 336.771.4600.
Sincerely,
�
�r47a
Sherri V. Knight
WSRO Regional Office
cc: WSRO Facility File
�S==� entral-Files

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
LISPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box 11
NC DENR
AQUIFER PROTECTION DIVISION nml
585 WAUGHTOWN,STREET
WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27107
eLNC0Dept.
µAS 1 1 Z0�5
Winston-Salem
Regional Office

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Mr, Arlin Buttice
Buttka, Dairy Enterprises
5796 Walker Mill Read
Randletnan, NC 273 i 7
A. Signature
© Agent
© Addressee
B. R ived by ( Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D.D. Is�ddress different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. S rvice Type
JZCertified Mai! ❑, xpress Mail
❑ Registered � Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number 7004 2510 0002 2066 9538
j (Transfer from se
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Rereipt 102595-01-M-038

0 •
ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number f )C6 - 3_o 00o O County Year 200 U
S✓tt .P ,r4 y -T 3 �e
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) V I I aM
Operator in Charge for this Facility ���'`Ph; /I d �,J,� ,� jt— ' Certification #
.2-1333
Land Aplication of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part H and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste
was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I : Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields ❑ or Pulls Kplease check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): � O'Pv j jr, Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: ) 4 Total Acres on which waste was applied 1.1 J f7 G
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
q 57
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit:
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year 0 tons Z or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
NO 14n l i9M1 0 S
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest W m P e
Smallest N a vu.
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers)
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable:
Part II: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
RECEIVEO
N.C. Dent. of ENR
AFACF 3-14-03 AUG 2 5.M
wnston•salo'
Regiona� 0— ce
l�

0 • �/
2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from U Yes ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past ❑ Yes VNo
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during ❑ Yes FI"No
the past calendar year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the ❑ Yes Q'No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year. _/
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. ❑ Yes L( No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon ❑ Yes [?/No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification. ❑Yes
�o
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
eyes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
2-Yes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
211Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the pen -nit were complied with during
VYes ❑ .No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all
CQ/Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
D/Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
" I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
1 Luc ► i1cj±ke, - - 0 trc� ✓t. �
P?�nitcc Name and Tle (type or print)
Signature of
Signature of Operator in Charge
(if different from Perinittee)
AFACF 3-14-03 2
=U
Date
1 Iy-v3
Date

DEVICES TO SOMATICALLY STOP IRRATION EVENTS
The State of North Carolina has issued NPDES General Permits for animal facilities to operate in North
Carolina. These Permits meet both State and EPA requirements and provide coverage for the following types of
facilities. •, i
NCA200000 (Swine Facilities)
NCA300000 (Cattle Facilities)
NCA400000 (Poultry Facilities with a wet waste management system)
You have recently been issued a Certificate of Coverage (COC) to operate your animal facility under one of
these General Permits.
Condition II. 16. of each of these Permits reads as follows:
Within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the effective date of a COC issued under this permit, the
permittee shall install, operate and maintain devices on all irrigation pumps/equipment designed to
automatically stop irrigation activities during precipitation. This condition does not apply to manure
spreaders or other equipment pulled by manned vehicles.
The permittee will not be required to install, operate and maintain the devices if the permittee commits
to provide for the presence of the OIC or the designated backup OIC at all times during the land
application of waste. This commitment must be submitted in' writing to the Division prior to the 120`"
day following the effective date of the COC on a form supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
Please check the box below that indicates your commitment to do one of the following.
❑ Within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the effective date of a COC issued under this permit, I shall
install, operate and maintain devices on all irrigation pumpslequipmeni designed to automatically stop
irrigation activities during precipitation. This condition does not apply to manure spreaders or other
equipment pulled by manned vehicles.
I will commit to provide for the presence of the Operator in Charge (01C) or the designated backup OIC at
all times during the land application of waste.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Facility Name Yh4c-:e!LdL Earm T nW - Facility Number 76 - 6 o
Permit Number jjLC.A - 3.0 6 0 d V
Permittee Name and Title (type or paint n
2)4z,
Signaturciof Permittee V
Signature of Operator in Chl
(if different from Permittee)
Date
q -;. 2-0
Date

'SR�Ng§
EA1' ONMENTAL ENGINING
Water • Wastewater • Sludge - Agricultural -Nit 0t.0ivEHNA
3AN Z 9 2002
Wkiston-Seale
Mr. David Meredith Janu
4718 Ramseur Julian Road
Liberty, N.C. 27298
Re: , Revisions to the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) for Meredell Farm, Inc.
Revisions concern the Melissa Rosebrock (DWQ) inspection of 11-30-01. DWQ Permit Number
AW1760060.
Dear David,
On November 30, 2001, Ms. Melissa Rosebrock with the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
performed an inspection at Meredell Farm. This was a routine inspection of your animal waste
management procedures, records, etc. Per her inspection, Ms. Rosebrock identified several waste
related issues she thinks should be addressed at your farm. I have enclosed a copy of her report with
this letter so there would be no question as to the issues. Subsequently Mr. Phillip Wright, on behalf of
Meredell Farm, contacted me .about responding to the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) revisions referenced.6y :Ms. Rosebrock: The main CAWMP revision I plan to address per
this inspection is the change of crop -type being grown in,Fieid # 6,
While working on this 'revision I discussed the inspection' report. with Ms.: Rosebrock.. 1t is Ms.
Rosebrock's opinion that any revisions to your. CAWMP be postponed until the new federal regulations
for confined animal operations get sorted out and become law. Since these new regulations are
supposed to be finalized by summer and since Meredell Farm will come under the new regulations (i.e.
the 700 dairy cow threshold), I would concur with Ms. Rosebrock's opinion. If the new . federal
regulations change the requirements for your CAWMP, we could make all of the plan revisions at one
time. This might be a little less confusing than doing a modification now and another one in a few
months.
Several issues Ms. Rosebrock listed in her report are procedural and do not relate to revisions in your
CAWMP; for example -- record; keeping, correcting any discharge from your manure storage pads, etc.
These type matters should be addressed ASAP by you and/or Mr. Wright.
If you have already planted fescue grass on Field # 6, you may want to apply animal waste to this crop
before we get your CAWMP revised. Given that Field # 6 is predominately a Mecklenburg soil series,
you can apply up to 200 pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (P.A.N.) per year to the fescue if it is well
established. Only apply about half this amount if the grass is young or the stand is thin. If you graze
the fescue do not apply more than 150 pounds of P.A.N. per acre per year, or 75% of the full 200
pounds. You will need to apply the PAN. in doses. The amount of wastewater (or solids) you put on
the grass at any one time will depend on the most, recent waste analysis. The typical range of P.A.N. to
land applyon fescue grass in any one application event is between'20 and 50 pounds per acre.. You can
see how to calculate, the. amount of waste to land apply in the CAWMP details prepared by EES.- Do
not forget to use your most recent waste test results when calculating P.A.N. applications.
P.O. SOX 426, ABERDEEN, N.C. 28315 9 PHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]

Also, in a few weeks I will be sending you some handy charts I am developing that make it easy to
estimate applications of waste from your most recent NCDA waste reports. In the meanwhile, the
information on how to estimate waste application amounts is already in your CAAW.
Your CAWMP specifies that you not irrigate more than 0.75 inches of effluent at any one time and do
not exceed application rates greater than 0.4 inches per hour. Do not allow the animal waste to run off
fields even if you have to reduce application rates or volumes. Typically, you will want to start animal
waste applications to fescue in February. Sometimes it is OK to apply manure in January if the weather
is mild and the grass is showing signs of growth. The decision is yours. You can also follow these
P.A,N. amount guidelines when applying slurry or solids, but make sure you get a representative waste
sample tested prior to application (i.e. within 60 days of application). DO NOT OVER APPLY P.A.N,
in any given year since this can get you a Notice Of Violation from DWQ. I would recommend you
stop or at least minimize waste applications to fescue from about June through August to avoid damage
to the crop. This again depends on the weather and the growth status of the fescue. Typically you can
start back with your P.A.N. applications on tall fescue sometime in September just as the grass begins
its fall growth. Avoid December and January waste applications unless the weather is mild and the
fescue growth is obvious.
When the revisions to your CAWMP are developed, I will provide you more details on the management
of tall fescue grass. But for now you can follow the above general guidelines.
I will send copies of this letter to Phillip Wright, Sue Homewood (DWQ), Melissa Rosebrock (DWQ),
Rocky Durham (S&WC), Margaret O'Keefe (S&WC), and Barton Roberson (NRCS) so each party will
know that Meredell Farm is on hold with the CAWMP revisions. I believe the other matters discussed
in Ms. Rosebrock's inspection report are being handled by Phillip Wright.
Let me know if I can answer any questions.
Best
enclosures
cc: Phillip Wright
Sue Homewood
Melissa Rosebrock
Rocky Durham
Margaret O'Keefe
Barton Roberson
F. Gra , P.E. /
fnme Engineering Services

01/23/2002 14:03 -36; 1140jv u1V rV, I
TVVV 4f YIgIf V CQmgli:lnct, Inspectign V Qperolign Fhlvigw p Wg44n �vWwali4n
Ressron for Visit ® Ficutine O Complaint O Fallow W O Emergency NoUticalion O Other L7 Denied Access
Facility Number C7G �,. {ip i)atr or vimu 'r
ime:[ rime: 103e
Not Operational 2 Below Threshold
Pern%itted ■ Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or AF,ovt: Thrtshold; ...-...-..............
Farm Name: M=sdcll,F.alCtrJM................................................................................... County; HWd,ahtbL__............. _................ ..
Owner Names l�sx�d__. _.._._. _..,. ,'!3 [ed�i h....W __ �._._....-----... Fhonc Not(33.Q.02Z-,Z4Z$ ...................................................
MailingAddreAs: M.M. l}:i4................. —............ .............. ,.,....... ,............ ...._........... f.rwlF7Cfy.=........,.,. _.._. __...........---.. �?���............
FacilityContact: ................ ..,Title:............ ........ ..... _.............. ...... .......... Phone No:...., ,.,....................................... .
Onsite Reprewntative: M.111R.Wilght ............................................. Integrator: ....._ .................. .......................... .... .......
Certified Cfiat'stor:XTt : #.a! .... ............... .._....... i lri <~.... _....... _......... _ .. „.. Operator Certification Number:,Zl.Md......... _.._..............
Locallm of Form:
.1112 Tze,* . i.%ot,ty. wr
C3 Swine [3 Poultry M Caltle D Worse Latitude 34 5I t Id Longitude 79 '
f'"'
i�er� '�''�'�{'lf� ri M�:.
;�i41�riFFiOY�F}.�L'S- 5 i�Stti 75fY'.P�4�'��1rY��s`�rEs��,r`C.,1 t{.t �l� �i t:�%.� Z'-}, "yip tk''
�f,;+'ii'�:
h•.Y4
1
t?
Wtsa11 4u ruvdc3
t= i aJu Daily .7000 700
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Non -La er I Non -Dairy
}.
Farrow to Feeder
a ,
otherILAn
* x r
,���i wti.�-i.�77, j 2 t0 V V �4f►'V
�'� t .u� - i` 'S t.Y k
t u...
T719maraeg is Scream l mRiyii
! T. .1; «.1 ., .�,. .d.�.. .rrl r,..,., n..�. i•.n.v ..i d•.. .•.y...�w.:1a.,4 t= Yw 0I-TV
A• If:6@kY/Rie IP 060& OQL' J.0 © 1 " p 149
v. .1 J[_..._G_ t--1---'-1. t................... M V .t.. ti..... i./. i'� �� .�.. r:� © ♦VQ Qt.v
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in-alfrnin?
.1. DV., d:va6P.6.a bypea.t to istc.•en 0yelo'"7 (If Font hetif�. DxvR) Q Voc M IrT.
2. la Uir.v oyl louvu yr FaA diz.lteuge f c-1 am Peat of thv, vPC'eATiu 1 C)'irea 13 i1u
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharec? ❑ 'Yes No
waatg Coll=tio& Tre. at
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway 0 Yes ® No
Structure I structure 2 s:.0clure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structum 6
Identifier: aw. asu P,and..... ...... m. Upper.......... ,__....Lowj=m_._..,............,..,.,..,..W......W......_ ..........................................._.....
Freeboard (inches): 2L' 54 96
ON03101 Car�itlut:d

01.123/2002 I4: 03 3367734630
DIV �:=
WATER. QUALITY
hCility Number: 76—A1:1
+f Impaction
1113gJ2001
PAGE 02
Udor tU a
M flnrs the diarlh-araP riry fintn the ronfinament buildine to tho ntnrgio pond or kpan fail to dinakarpe Aver 6ai-5vr
liquid lcVoi of lagoon or staregc pond with no aciraticil7
27. .Ara thara any Hand nnirr,nln vent Aigrwt.-A of r%mi- •i-1y
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land npPlirnrirvi') (i a.., residua on neighboring vegatsrinri, Arplimlr,
dLmJb, buiWit% auuvauan, -sndlur pvt ltu property)
r'>, 1.1 the land uppliaation spray AYMCIm i,arekV. „1++ 11,,..,,r,l iitluiti &wfau:r Urkl+r Iu8(J4'%r+7
30. Were any major mainrenancc problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
u; 1NIALrSll rYr] IIIx-IIAir+rr.IHlrvriiutrrr, i•rr )
3l . rk-- the .mkrsls feed ctorn5e.binF Fail to hava appropriate oov6r7
32. Do the flash tanks Jack a taihrlmereed till pig nr a pprnnnnPflillriJ%f%rs%ry rn,rnr7
05103101
❑'I'r, 0 tiiz
l3 Yoa ® r4 a
mYa!; EN
U Yea H No
p Ygn- p Nv
p Y" ❑ 140

61/2J(2002 14:433 J:ibl!14b3kj 1.714 LA- 14AIt-K UJAL.1lY W. AUL N�
Fu1.5Ry Namb-er: 76-•60 Date of inspectio» 1il30l2001 v
5. Are there any immediate throats toWE grity of any of the structurc,-s observed? (ie/ tre vere erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which arc not properly address ed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? C] Yes ® No
'(T!' any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate pubils health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
1. Do any of the structures ncci mainwriancchmprQvcment? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste nanagement systcrn other than waste struoture3 require maintenance/irnproven:ent7
Z YCS
0 No
9. Do any stucti res lack adequate, gauged mau'kers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation maddrigs?
Q Yes
®NO
WiMe A pslation
10. Are there any buffers that nocx l rrtaintenancelitriprovemetit?
❑ 'Yes
IN No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding Q PAN Q Hydraulic Overload
❑Yes
9 No
12. Crop type Small Grain Overseed Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops dif..ier with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP')?
® Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
U Yes
®Na
c) This facility is pended For a wettable acre'determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop n.-ed improvement'?
0 Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
1tegi ir�gb & Driclim•tt#�
17. Fail to have Cerdfkate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste -Management Plan readily avastable?
(ieJ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste anaiysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
[] No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
2l. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DNVQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'(
(ic/ discharge, freeboard ,problems, over application)
C) Yes
No
23. Did Reviewcr/lnspectot fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
© Yes
10 No
25. Were any additional protlems noted which cause noncompiiance of the Certified X-VMP
❑ Yes
® No
XFNo vio sttions or iii&cit!09'es were noted during this visit. You will Weeive no further correspondence about this vlslt.
❑ Field Coy ® Final Notes
3. Some dralnage is corning tiff of bedding pile, waste has not left property. Operator plans to concrete and berm this area as soon as
13. Operator is applying was!e to oats (huy) and fescue thay) that is harvested from field number six. This crop needs to be added to
AWMP.
14. Irrigation design was by *Ronnie Wall of Gra-Mak and signed 9125100; Was done on wetted acres.
19. Need to keep irrigated waste application by "pulls" Hnd wetted acres (page 46 in CAWNIP). Solid waste applications trey use the
s for the entire field.
19. Need to use the PAN frost the CAWMP in calculations (aat3e 46 for irrigation and Qam 50 for solid). r
ReviewerAlopertor Norma Rosebrock
ReviewerAnspector Signsiture: ZAP Date: Q
V.7/ VJ/ V 1 I-V""a"Va

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEEAG SERVICES
Water • Wastewater • Sludge • Agricultural • Industrial • Civil
NCDENR
Division Of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617
Attn: Sue Homewood
August 21, 2001
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of ENR
AUG 2 3 2001
Re: Reply letter related the recently revised Certified Animal Waste Management
Farm, Inc., Randolph County, North Carolina. DWQ Permit Number AWI760060.
1 Ice
Dear Ms. Homewood,
This is a reply to your August 6, 2001 letter about the above referenced farm and its associated waste
utilization plan. For brevity I will attempt to answer your four questions in the order asked, In addition
there may be a few extra points of interest I will need to include after your four questions are answered.
Question 1- Answer; The latest Meredell Farm Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAVR P)
revisions developed by Environmental Engineering Services (EES) attempted to identify all of the
liquid waste storage structures at Meredell Farm. This was done in an effort to explain to the reader just
how the animal waste flows and where it is stored;,; These structures will not need ,alteration,in order to
satisfy the plan revisions submitted. The primary waste storage pond has been in existence,for -years (as
mentioned -in,the EES document) and was designed by the NRCS, not'EES. ' This structure is not
changing in shape or volume, and, was thus noV recertified during'. this CAWMP revision effort. in
addition Meredell Farm is lowering their permitted number*of animals from 2,000 head to 1,500. Given
these two factors alone I do not see the need to do anything to the old waste storage pond except place
a water level marker at theappropriate level(s). A rather lengthy discussion about the storage pond and
volume considerations appears in the latest revised CAWMP.
For clarity please note there are several freeboards that are of particular interest in a dairy waste holding
pond. I will list these here for illustration. They are being listed from the top of the dam down.
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
Emergency
This is the distance from the top of the dike to the overflow invert of the emergency spillway. This
Freeboard
distance protects the dike from a random overflow of water should the pond experience overflow
conditions. This freeboard never contains water. Its depth can vary with the designer's opinion. I
'
assume the NRCS desi ed an emergency freeboard into the pond when it was constructed.
Heavy
On older temporary waste storage ponds, this volume does not apply. When it does apply (i.e. for
Rainfall
new ponds) it is measured from the Normal Freeboard level in the pond to the point of overflow
Factor .
out of the emergency spillway. This space typically holds the volume from one 25 year -•24 hour
'
storin over'and above the 25 ear'- 24 hour storm considered for the Normal Freeboard.
Normal t;
..On older ponds; this is the distance from•the top of six month storage'level to the point of overflow.
Freeboard.
out of the.emergency spillway, This volume istypically one 25 year. 24 hour storm, On older .
:. waste storage ponds not -being altered and without SSLW increases, this is the only required
reserve volume.
P.O. BOX 426, ABERDEEN, N.C. 28315 • PHONE [phone] - FAX [phone]

From reading the SB 1217 Interagency Group's Seventh Guidance memo, I do not think Meredell Farm
is required to reserve both a Normal Freeboard and a Heavy Rainfall Freeboard in their main waste
holding pond. However, if they choose to have both for safety reasons, 1 do not see a big problem.
This will however shorten the number of storage days they would have to contain animal waste between
irrigation events.
Question 2 Answer: I discussed this question with Mr. Ronnie Wall with Gra-Mac Distributing
Company. Mr. Wall is the certified technical specialist who designed, installed, and certified the
Meredell Farm irrigation system. According to Mr. Wall the latest revised irrigation documentation for
the new CAWMP does not show ditches within the irrigation fields. There are however grass water
ways within the fields that convey stormwater. The aerial photograph included in the latest CAWMP
(Exhibit 4) shows dark lines in some of the fields. These are grass water ways and not groundwater
lowering ditches. There are some broken blue line and solid blue line streams around the farm, but no
irrigation is being made over these streams. Mr. Wall said he took great care to not designate irrigation
in wet areas or onto deep ditches around the borders of the fields.
Question 3 Answer: Starting on page 31 of the latest CAWMP under the title CROP PLANTING
AND FERTILIZING CONSIDERATIONS, you will find a discussion on the use of rye as a cover crop
and corn as the main crop at Meredell Farm. Therefore I will not repeat all of the particulars herein.
You are correct when you mention that Meredell will irrigate animal waste on the rye but not harvest
this crop. Instead they will plow under this crop just prior to corn planting.
As you will note in Tables 26, 27, 29, 30, and 32, Meredell Farm gets no (zero) nitrogen removal
credits for growing rye. This is because they do not plan to harvest the rye, However, Tables 28, 31,
and 33 show that waste can be applied to the rye when it is growing. In several places of the plan I
mention that 100 percent of the nitrogen removal credits are being given to the Meredell corn crop and
no credits to the rye. Instead of land applying all of the nitrogen just before and just after corn planting,
the new plan allows for spreading out some of the nitrogen applications through out the year.
You will note that the amount of nitrogen being applied to the rye crop is relatively small, on a pounds
per acre basis. This fertilization is to enhance the rye crop and make it a better cover crop, a better
erosion control crop, and a better soil amendment crop once plowed under. This relatively small
amount of nitrogen applied over the "non -corn seasons" should be good to help produce biomass,
which should in turn help the tilth of the soil. Still, the majority of the animal waste nitrogen is applied
just before or soon after corn planting. Meredell Farm has the option of harvesting the rye if they so
choose. If harvested they could take credit for the nitrogen removal of the rye crop in addition to the
corn crop.
For your information, the revised CAWMP specifically discusses the use of the rye 1 corn combination
in several places, starting on page 31. As far as liquid waste storage is concerned, Tables 9 and 33
show information about Meredell's storage capabilities. I believe these tables and associated support
documentation demonstrate that adequate storage exists in the Meredell Farm waste storage pond to
match their cropping plans. I personally think all CAWMPs need to have detailed comparisons and
water balances presented for each farm since crop irrigation, seasonal rainfall, and liquid storage are all
tied together. Yet I find the question of adequate storage at this farm a little odd since none of the
NRCS or Cooperative Extension CAWMPs I have reviewed show detailed rainfall data and water
balances. I hope this type of analysis will eventually become part of all plans, especially at dairies.
OA

Question 4 Answer: Page 31 of the latest CAWMP does mention that the farmer can change his
cropping patterns if he so chooses. This was intended to mean the acres of corn or rye grown, the
amount of animal waste applied to each crop (within reason), waste application timing, harvesting or
not harvesting the rye, etc. It does not mean the farmer can change the species of crop being grown
without the certification of a technical specialist. The owners of Meredell Farm understand that they
must grow the type of crops shown in this plan. if for no other reason, this letter shall serve notice that
all changes in crop type will require a revision of the CAWMP by a certified technical specialist.
While we are on this subject I would like to express some disagreement with DWQ's need to revise a
CAWMP for small changes to that plan. As I have said before, we should not loose sight of the big
picture of farming and the farmer's struggle to make a living. The farmer should not be caught up in
much formal paperwork to make a minor change in his or her operation. For example, if Meredell
Farm were to choose to grow winter wheat (i.e. still a small grain) instead of rye, I see no reason to
alter the entire plan for this minor change. This is simply overkill for such a small alteration. Now if
they were to replace their corn crop with soybeans for instance, this would be a major change and
should require a plan revision. Large or small changes to a farming operation should be made as easy as
possible while still providing prudent stewardship of animal waste. I hope DWQ will think about their
requirements and make them a little more farmer friendly.
Additional Comments: On July 23, 2001 you were sent the Technical Specialist Certifications for
Meredell Farm along with an acknowledgment form, signed by Mr. David Meredith and myself. I trust
this satisfies DWQ's requirements for plan signatures.
If you have additional questions about Meredell Farm's CAWMP please let me know. I am sending you
an extra copy of this letter as per your request. Thank -you for your continued interest in this matter.
cc: David Meredith
Phillip Wright
Barton Roberson (MRCS)
Melissa Rosebrock (DWQ)
Environmental
3
t'C pIR4/

I
® ENAONMENTAL ENGINE NG SERVICES
Water Wastewater Sludge • Agricultural Industrial Civil
Jui}� i MI VIIED
NCDENR 'w �
Division of Water Quality M
c/o Sue Homewood L1 JUL 16 1� HOI
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Technical Specialist Certifiications For 11zedellFarmir�c:, Randolph County. Facility I.D. Number
76-60.
Dear Ms. Homewood,
Please find enclosed one or more signed certification forms (version 12-5-00) for the above referenced
farm. The attached Technical Specialist Certification forms are being sent in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H. 0200 rules and regulations for animal waste storage, treatment, and utilization on new or
expanding facilities. Please read the entire letter to see what is being certified. The signed forms attached
to this letter are indicated below:
Section H. Certification Of Design.
A) Collection, storage, treatment system ............ ....... ................. ......... yes
B) Land application site...................................................................... yes
C) Run-off controls from exterior lots ... .............................................. yes
D) Application and handling equipment ...... ......................................... yes
E) Odor control, insect control, mortality management, and
emergency action plan.................................................................. yes
F) Written notice of new or expanding swine farm .............. . ...... ....... not applicable
Section UL Certification Of Installation.
A) Collection, storage, treatment installation ....................................... yes
B) Land application site...................................................................... yes
C) Run-off controls from exterior lots :.............................. . ................ yes
D) Application and handling equipment installation ............................ . yes
E) Odor control, insect control, mortality management, and
emergency action plan................................................................... yes
The reader will please note the following comments about the above certification(s):
General Comments
Any and all attached certification forms are being signed by the Technical Specialist in an effort to comply
with the requirements stated in the 15A NCAC 2H 0.200 rules for animal waste management. The
Technical Specialist is stating that the plans being certified are complete to the best of his ability to
comply with the intent of the rules. However the enclosed certification(s) reflect the plans being
complete at the time of development and within the scope of work ordered. If plans were done at an
earlier date, the plans being certified herein may not comply with recent rule changes or the most recent
specification revisions published by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), DWQ,
P.O. BOX 426, ABERDEEN, N.C. 28315 • PHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]

legislative actions, etc. Some of the rules and standards developed for animal waste systems are not well
defined as of this certification date. In addition some of the rules and guidelines needed for such
certifications are still under interpretation. The Technical Specialist has made every effort to comply with
the intent of the 0.200 rules.
The Technical Specialist is certifying that the above referenced farm has a certifiable plan for the system
or systems being discussed in this letter. The details of certified plans can differ between farms and can
vary depending on whether the farm is existing or if the farm is new. The certification form(s) indicate
that the plans being discussed should work for that farm given the on -site level of management required is
provided. No certification can be all inconclusive and be certified to contain each and every aspect of all
possible outcomes associated with high intensity animal operations. The reader must review the plans to
see what is being certified.
Specific Comments
Meredell Farm is an existing dairy that has been operation under an Animal Waste Operation Permit,
for many years (Permit # AWI76006). This old permit classified Meredell Farm as a user of
innovative animal waste treatment technology. Problems associated with certain innovative
technologies at Meredell Farm required them to make alterations to their operations after February of
1998 (time of permit issuance). The farm was certifted:for.2;000-cows-under'the-old-permit. Meredell
Farm now wlShes_to_change its waste treatment-procedures-and_redu the-�number_of_anEa_ls-t"off
Q1.;500=head,_or-1;000-milk cows -plus -dry -cows -and -heifers. Additional details about the history of the
e cu e t a changes and thrm needs are discussed within the C._urlViP_r visions developed by
Environmental Engineering Services (EES) and dated�June 5, 200.1_.=
2. For years, Meredell Farm has been operating under (i.e. following) a Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP) developed by a certified technical specialist with the NC Cooperative
Extension Service. This CAWMP included many tracts of land at and near the dairy. Some land
parcels mentioned in the older plan are owned by Meredell Farm and some were rented. With the
recent addition_of'an-irrigation- sygtem`at the Meredell Farm, owned land (identified as ,tract- # 4471)—
there arose a need to revise the CAWMP to include the new irrigation system, The existing
CAWMP for other sites or tracts of land are still in place, Therefore the engineer is not recertifiy1rtg11
all of the land areas identified in the old CAWMP; my tract # 4471.
3. There is an existing temporary waste storage pond (used for primary storage) at Meredell Farm. This
primary storage pond was designed and certified by the Randolph County NRCS. There are two
smaller solids settling cells (earthen basins) on -site whose construction was overseen by EES.
However the sizing of these cells was done by others. The engineer is only certifying in Section 1I,
part A, that the reported primary storage pond volume is sufficient in size to provide adequate storage
for the intended purpose of the EES plan. The engineer is not certifying the adequacy of dike
construction of the primary storage pond since that was done by the NRCS. The engineer used the
volumes reported by the NRCS to estimate available days of storage. The two small solids settling
cells offer little additional liquid storage. Construction of the two smaller solids settling cells were
observed by EES and their dikes are believed to be constructed in accordance with typical NRCS
standards. Section III, part A of the attached form is being supplied to reflect the supervised
construction of the settling cells only.
4. The certifications under Section II, part B, and Section 111, part B relate only to Tract # 4471. The
other tracts included in the old CAWMP can continue to be used as stated in the old plan.
2

5. The certifications under Section 11, part C, and Section III, part C relate only to the modifications or
improvements to the existing Best Management Practices (BMP's) associated with Run -Off Controls
From Exterior Lots. The primary new improvement was the &d'ditioil�afa-fresh-water-catch-b"asin'
down st`ream:frorr A e'dxterior_lotl. Please keep in mind that the old BMP's associated with Run -Off
Controls from Exterior Lots, and developed by others, are not being changed or recertified by EES.
b. A new irrigation system was designed and installed at Meredell Farm by Gra-Mac Distributing
Company. Mr. Ronnie Wall is a certified technical specialist with Gra-Mac Distributing Company
and signed Section Ii, part D, and Section III, part D.
7. The certifications under Section 11, part E, and Section 111, part E relate only to the modifications or
improvements to the existing BMP's associated with Odor Control, Insect Control, Mortality
Management, and Emergency Action Plans at Meredell harm. The EES certification is intended to
complement the existing plans and re-emphasize the importance of such plans. The old BMP's
developed by others are not being changed or recertified by EES.
8. In addition to the enclosed technical specialist certifications, you will find a copy of the CAWMP
Receipt Acknowledgment form signed by Mr. David Meredith. This form verifies that the farmer
received a copy of the EES plan revisions and understands their content.
Meredell Farm, Inc. has spent much effort and money to develop and implement innovative waste
treatment technology at their farm. This has required they make waste management changes as needed to
fit their farming operation. They have done an good job at overall waste management while trouble
shooting the innovative equipment, The latest plans developed by EES are to be incorporated into the
overall Meredell Farm operation to make the existing plans and BMP's work better. Also, the latest set
of EES developed plan helps integrate the new irrigation system with cropping plans and waste storage
capacities at the farm. The certified technical specialist forms do not allow much room for explanation
or for modifications like were done at Meredell Farm. Thus I hope the associated EES certifications will
be taken as intended and not seen as a complete replacement for all other technical specialist
certifications.
A copy of this letter and the certification forms will be sent to those listed below. Should you have
questions please call my office.
enclosures
cc; David Meredith (farm owner)
Phillip Wright (farm owner)
Barton Roberson (Randolph Co. NRCS)
Melissa Rosebrock (Regional office of DWQ)
Shelia Jordan (Cooperative Extension Service)
3

Te nical Specialist Certificen R ram, r.O , *� -16 -60
LAs a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Water Quality as specified in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements are
included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each certification (SD,
SI, WUP, RC,1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they arc technically competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) Collection Stora a Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements.
❑ New, expanded or retrofitted facilit -,(SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
C+rArn�J,e been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
�}ame (Aical Specialist (Please Print): 199111all
Afl'tion r ' ,rtc �c ��� ` Date Work Completed:___
Phone No.:2&-WO-kY-k
��'•,9�'JP�:••�'8 •� Date: _ 7 d3
44
'LWO A Iic n Site ( ) -5 % 6r4s11-":3 A/c,,
The plan pr ides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
�`,tiuttt;srrsprtablc for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
AR
�Ctnical Specialist (Please Print): /111elIT
w
_; �1 t ihtiorib5"eela. Date Work Completed: i�~S
- 16
t�Mess ('Age�py): � Phone No.:
Date: _ - 00
JrJ M f � �i � � � � -
JJ'r'off Co ols from Briar Lots
Check the approviate box
Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
W Facility with exterior lots (RC) J'W
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
"' .,,�����,•_ accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
��••�i�rS�t nical Specialist (Please Print): Ll�2k►� / �r12ANr9•�►� , f!,
Date Work Completed:-��
A NES (Ek ): �` ! Phone No.: - - d
'irk!'%• •• � `r`" V
Date:
+���iJF��i48 berg,? 2
J"llIAillt�ti*�'

+ 11tE?A--,Ae,4i f-LZrv�/ t r14
111b). Application and HandLima Equipment
Check the appropriate box • ++ yy 7� �f �� 60
❑ Existing or expanding facility with existing waste 2212lication equipment (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has'been either field calibrated or evaluated in accordance
with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste
management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed
either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established;
required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan).
f� New, exnanded, or existine facility without existing waste ap�ation_e_niiiPmcnt for spray irritation.
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications
has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
❑ New, exnanded, or existing* facility without existing waste application equipment for land spreading not using sera
irritation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications
has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Tow rs t E __ W A l
Affiliation MAAC. b s &*Rt L mA lam— CM p&Aj_Date Work Completed: 1 ] - q -Leo o
Address (Agency):?-310 N C W 4 01 0" __rV%— let I'd le._/, P one No.: 33 (6
Signature: r,-r•.++ti•���� Date: zoo I
E)
CA.R0�
44L
nsect Control. M
and Emer encv
SI WUP. RC or I Awa-el Ae, 2b fi� 9 aM 10s
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control
Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan.. Sources of both odors and insects have
,P,cen evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best Management
fPtiices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the Mortality
ement Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are co-mplete and can be implemented by this facility.
Q �ie�o' Te�hnical Specialist (Please Print):�f/r�r�'1
i f iatiart Y h r/i' — Date Work Completed: _ 4 -S •-01
:r s
d�gt'P1,ncy): G Phone Na.:iCJ��i��f•-/G
Y
f,.. ,` Date:
'f�V!if f /a7 gi11tt1s
F) Written Noticed ems• or Ex6andin , Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners who
own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in
compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- December 5, 2000

III. Certification o�ristallation i2""` �` ��
A) Collection, Storage. Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.,
-?/ Ilea. ryCN1/
�Q%\k CARO
T,
� rie
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
nical Specialist (Please Print):
Date Work Completed: 6 5-G/
2-,J?3/S-_Phone No.: 7/0
Date:
i5icvi$ 7Z) .
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
lease Print):
Date Work Completed: ' C�-5 _0
;?2 /� Phone No.: /"
ate: 7-12-3 --a /
Facility with exterior lots `� �, .rNs % �'r' ".1-5 V�Ps
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified in
the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certificatioti is necessary.
icai Specialist (Please Print):
Work Completed:_
Phone No.:
E' rAnimal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner has
proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): :R ,Qp IV l E LJ A l f
Affiliation G-R - ^)-c ��s`1�aR� b u�aa o Comp Date Work Completed: la - q - 'Zoo 0
Address (Agency):;310 1JC 11w. gd NUJIle.oC Phone Na.: 336-`tg8- Si --nature:— �• Date:
AWC -- December 5, 2000

IfYlQ'vetde tf
i�G'Jca fpLL
14%O .V,ontrol. Insect CoTitrol and Mortality Management (SD. SI. WUP. RC or 1)
Met ds to Control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
S {i talit! maAaaement system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Il4?ne�KsT finical Specialist (Please Print):.__ "00— ZL 2*W4;10 , P
''.,�'�p�,••FkG.,. 'az'ro�rol _(;9Vy'CP�I Date Work Campieted:
►''°rr,rr,��r� Phone No.:
Sisnature: Date: a?
Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- December S. 2000

•
CERTIFIED ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN RECEIPT
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
L The undersigned .person(s) hereby acknowledges that he/she has received a copy of the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) revisions developed by Larry F.
Graham, P.E. (certified technical specialist) with Environmental Engineering; Services for
Meredell Farm (dairy), which is located on State Road 4 2442 (Ramseur- Julian Road),
Randolph County. Facility I.D. # 76-60. This CAWMP was dated June 5, 2001. He or she
also acknowledges that he/she has read the CAWMP, understands the information provided,
and knows lie/she must adhere to the intent of the CAWMP.
2. The uiidersigried person hereby acknowledges that he/she was involved with the
development of the CAWMP and gave input to the engineer about historical farming practices,
historical yields of crops, desired crop planting; schedules, existing and new irrigation
equipment, property lines, future farming plans, etc.
Farm owner(s) or their representative(s)-
Signature:
Title: e
Date:�--
Signature:
Title:
Date:
Signature:
Title:
Date:
1. The undersigned engineer hereby certifies that he has provided Meredell Farm with at least
two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) revisions referenced
above. /7
Engin,
Comp
Date:
2

wL. r t
ENV 4NMENTAL ENGINEER G SERVICES
Water - Wastewater - Sludge • Agricultural - Industrial - Civil
Meredell Farm ��`\`✓ Jung 5, 0
c/o David Meredith C 0�
4718 Ramseur Julian Road !UN
Liberty, NC 27298
Phone: [phone]
wi l`iston-sa1•eo
Re: Revised Animal Waste Management Plans and Documentation for the ,MerRF0W t �(Da1f' ;
Randolph County. DWQ Facility LD. # 76-60.
Dear Mr, Meredith,
The Certified Animal Waste Management Plan for the above referenced farm is now complete according
to the task given Environmental Engineering Services. This plan revises the fields in Tract 4471. The
following persons will get the.following documentation:
• 'You are receiving one'complete'animal `waste utilization package enclosed with this letter. I will send
Phillip Wright a` copy�for his fifes..• I :would ask you to' review this plan to make sure' it fits;your needs
and'reasonablyrep'resents your"farmin' '' lans:
+ Bd toh Roberson -with -the Randolph' County NRCS' WilI `get7one copy.of ttie corriplae package. i "i
• Ms.•Sue Homewood vMh•)DWQ will^`get a'cornplete copy:oft us package also. It istriiy•undefstandirig
that tivs;revi§ed package shouldIsdrve•as a permit modification form for DWQ.' 'I�have-asked her'to
let me know if there is some` oilier form 1 need to send in' on your behalf.
IS. I am sending Ms. Melissa Rosebrock a copy of this letter only.
The following items are of particular importance. However do not fail to read the entire document to
know its content.
1. The old plan that Sheila Jordan developed for Meredell Farm is still in place. We only replaced the
specifications related to the fields on your farm, i.e. tract 4471 • The off -site fields you have been
using are stilt valid under the -old plan.
2. Many assumptions were made inside this new plan to predict nitrogen generation and the potential
nitrogen uptake of the crops you will grow. I have assumed 1',000 milk cows, 250 dry cows, and 250
heifers. Based on these assumptions there is not enough land in Tract 4471 to apply all of your liquid,
slurry, and solid waste. In other words, I think you will have to haul some of your solids to
neighboring crop land. I have assumed you will only grow corn silage on your farm Iand for harvest.
The rye you plant will be -for a'Cover crop only. You must keep track of what you grow, how much
you grow; where"you :apply ttie waste, how much waste is applied,'etc:' in order to keep track of how
much, nitrogen you' are using" -This, plan"is realistic but' it is •riof ' foot proof.' 1,'liave', enclosed: some
examples of how' to calculafe tite application of waste: '.'Be'su''e'to collect�waste-samples'regularly and
s6ilsar"0p!'I at'least yearly." 'Pay particular attention to metal loadings in future soil samples.
3. Whife you are at'tlie 650 head size, I think you can apply most'all of your waste to Tract 447I - You
may wish to closely monitor the nitrogen applications to make sure myassumption`is correct.
P.O. BOX 426, ABERDEEN,'N.C. 28315 - PHONE [phone] - FAX [phone]

4, This new waste management plan for Tract 4471 is as comprehensive as any plan I have seen to date.
However it is a best estimate on what will happen. Future waste application amounts will depend on
the quantity of crops harvested, waste analyses, and probably crop tissue sampling. If crop yields
drop off you will have to cut back on waste applications. Keep your crops in tip top shape!
5. Your waste storage pond and settling cells can not overflow, so keep them under control. Your main
waste storage pond and settling cell # 2 pond must be marked with water level indicators and these
read (and recorded) weekly.
b. There is a large amount of information in this package so please read it and notice all of the
precautions. Be especially careful to avoid all off -site waste run-off.
7. 1 have included the information supplied by Gra-Mac Distributing Company, Inc. as part of this plan.
I did not review their calculations on each pull, wetted acres, etc. but will assume it is correct. I have
used Sheila Jordan's acreage figures for the fields in Tract 4471.
After reviewing the enclosed information let me know if you have questions. I can come to the farm and
spend some time with you and Phillip if you ever need some hands-on guidance, help with irrigation
calibrations, calculations on nutrient loadings, waste analyses, or any other part of the overall effort.
However, to keep your expenses down I will wait until you request such service.
Thank -you for your time in this matter and allowing Environmental Engineering Services to -be of
assistance.
enclosures
cc; Phillip Wright
Barton Roberson (MRCS)
Sue Homewood (DWQ - Raleigh)
Melissa Rosebrock (DWQ - Winston Salem)

(:N
ENV&NMENTAL ENGINEEFAG SERVICES
Water • Wastewater • Sludge • Agricultural • Industrial • Civil
NCDENR .Tune 5, 2001
Division Of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617
Attn: Sue Homewood
Re: Revised Certified Animal Waste Management Plans (CAWMP) and Documentation for the
Meredell Farm (Dairy), Randolph County. DWQ Facility I.D. # 76-60,
Dear Ms. Homewood,
Please find enclosed. a revised or modified Certified Animal Waste Management Plan for the
above referenced farm. It is my understanding from a letter Mr. David Meredith received from
Mr, Larry Coble (copy attached) that I was to send you a. copy of the plans once the revisions
were complete. I also understand from Mr. Coble's letter that the enclosed CAWMP package
serves as the application form and that there is no fee for this modification request. Please note
that the number of cows at Meredell Farm has been revised to 1,500 head instead of the 2,000
head mentioned in the last DWQ issued permit.
Please. let me know if there are any forms or certifications I need to send DWQ on behalf of
Meredell Farm: Do not hesitate to call my office if I can answer any questions.
Best
Grahat/P. E.
EnNffironmental Engineering Services
enclosures
cc: David Meredith
Phillip Wright
Melissa Rosebrock (DWQ - Winston Salem)
P.O. BOX 426, ABERDEEN, N.C. 28315 • PHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]

Y"JAME9 B. HUNT JR.
.`<BILCHOLMAN
SECRETARY
ERR T-�STEVENS
DIRECTOR
NORTHOROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
r- 1
April 20, 2000
Mr. David Meredith
4718 Ramseur -Julian Road
Liberty, NC 27298
SUBJECT: Permit Modification
Meredell Farm, Inc. - Facility # 76-60
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Meredith:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of written correspondence from Mr. Larry
Graham, P.E. in our office on April 4, 2000. Mr. Graham wrote on behalf of Meredell
Farm, Inc. to update our office of "the existing system performance" and "plans for
modifications" regarding animal waste treatment activities.
This office appreciates your voluntary efforts to keep the Division of Water
Quality informed of the animal waste management situation at Meredell Farm, Inc.
Note, however, that any change to the wastewater treatment system at the farm requires
permit modification. Please submit a letter requesting modification to the attention of
Sue Homewood, NCDENR Division of Water Quality, 1617 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1617. She may be reached by phone at 919.733.5083 ext. 502
should you have specific application questions. The application may be in the form of a
letter with detailed descriptions, engineering calculations, drawings, equipment
specifications, etc. There is no fee to modify your Animal Waste Permit.
The Winston-Salem Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter.
As always, if we may be of assistance please contact Melissa Rosebrock or me at (336)
771-4608.
Sincerely,
f
"°:
Larry D. Coble
Water Quality Supervisor
=
cc: Sue Homewood - DWQ Non -Discharge Perlxtitting Unit
Larry Graham — Environmental Engineering Services
Phillip Wright —Meredell Farm, Inc. Manager
Randolph County Natural Resources Conservation Service
WSRO Facility Files
Central Files
5
r=:
'
565 WAUGHTOWN STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27107
,. ,..,.
PHONE 336-771 •46o0 FA% 336.771 -4630
_
.,.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolif
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
� )VA
IKW
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 6, 2000
Mr. Larry F. Graham, P.E.
Environmental Engineering Services
PO Box 426 • RECEIVE.®
Aberdeen, NC 28315 N.C. [)ept. Of EHNR
D E E 12 2000
RE: Meredell Farm, Facility Number 76-60
Dear Mr. Graham, Winston-SalemRegional Office
I am writing in response to your letter to me dated November 21, 2000 with regards to the
Animal Waste Operations Permit currently held by Meredell Farms in Randolph County. Mr.
Meredell currently has an individual permit for an innovative wastewater treatment system in use
at Meredell farms. According to your letter, Mr. Meredell would like to make significant
changes to this system and requests an opinion on the permit processing requirements.
The proposed wastewater treatment system as described in your letter may be issued a Certificate
of Coverage under the Cattle Operations General Permit. In order to begin the process of
modifying the permit issued to Meredell Farms, Mr. Meredell mustsubmit a6.written�requesrfor'a-=*
pe=, Com— odif'cation. Enclosed is an ap-1ication#qr---, -general permit -for an existing wastewater
treatment facility at an animal operation. Mr. Meredell should complete this application, and
submit the application in duplicate, along with all requirements noted on page 2 of the
application and a narrative of the system to my attention at the address below. The Certificate of
Coverage should be issued prior to making major changes at the facility.
Meredell Farms was recently inspected by regional staff at the Division of Water Quality. Mr.
Meredell will be required to address all concerns raised during this inspection, prior to receiving
a Certificate of Coverage. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me
at 919-733-5083 x502.
Si cerely,
Sue Homewood
Cc: �Melissa:-Rosebrock, Winston-Salem-Regional_Office; Water -Quality Section
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Permit File AWI760060
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh. North Carolina 27699.-1,617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper

l
ENVI NMENTAL ENGINEERIG SERVICES
Water • Wastewater • Sludge • Agricultural • Industrial -9 Civil
copesNCDENR o Novgt�er 21, 2004 - -
Division Of Water Quality
�s`� �EIVED
e
1617 Mail Service Center Rt► Of EHNR
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-.1617 NOV 2 2 7009
Attn; Sue Homewood Winsto
Regrc�"Sa lerr�
Re: Update on animal waste treatment activities at Meredell Farm, Inc., Mdonsh9sh*-;
North Carolina. DWQ Permit Number AWI760060.
Dear Ms. Homewood,
I have recently talked to,Ms. Melissa Rosebrock from the Winston Salem Office of DWQ. She
and I discussed the above referenced farm and the need for some permit clarification at this
farm. It is my understanding she also discussed the matter with you. As you know Meredell
Farm currently has an "Animal Waste Operation Permit" for the treatment and disposal of their
animal waste. I am not sure if the existing permit is a non -discharge permit or a hybrid permit
of some sort. Since we are now in the process of applying for a modification to the details
within this permit, we need to make sure just what we are applying for and the criteria on
which to base the system details.
On behalf of Meredell Farm I would like to outline the farm's current situation (which you
probably know) and their near -term waste treatment plans. Hopefully after reviewing these
details you can offer some official advice.
E_x_isting. Situation
1. Hoffland Environmental, Inc. helped Meredell Farm obtain the current Animal Waste
Operation -Permit back in October of 1997. I am including the cover letter and the first page
of this permit for reference. This permit was for 2000 dairy cattle. Hoffland
Environmental installed much of the waste treatment equipment mentioned within the
permit. Hoffland's waste treatment equipment is still in place, but has required frequent
repairs. Hoffland Environmental has made several improvements to their solids separation
equipment since it was first installed, but subsequent equipment breakdowns and poor
solids removal efficiency has forced Meredell to discontinue use of the equipment.
2. The basic treatment and disposal process mentioned within the original Meredell Farm
permit is as follows:
• Moving flush water and manure over an inclined screen to remove solids
• Taking the partially cleaned flush water from the solids separator and storing it in .a large
waste holding pond. Here the wastewater would be aerated using floating aerators. This
P.O. BOX 426, ABERDEEN, N.C. 28315 9 PHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]

•
aerobic treatment process was proposed to remove nutrients from the waste prior to land
application.
• Floating curtains were installed within the pond to assist in wastewater clarification and
solids segregation.
• To irrigate 20 acres of fescue grass using the stored and treated wastewater from the
holding pond. This irrigation was to take place via a solid set spray irrigation system.
• Install pumps, piping, wiring, etc. necessary to achieve the intended flows and system
dynamics
3. Any modifications made to the Meredell Farm dairy waste treatment system since the
original permit was issued has been done to improve or enhance the Hoffland equipment,
not to change the permitted treatment approach. As you know, two solids settling cells
were installed last year to improve the solids removal efficiency of the Hoffland solids
separator. This was done per the request of Hoffland Environmental. These two settling
cells have done a good job at keeping solids out of the large waste holding pond, but I do
not think the mechanical separator efficiency was improved by this addition. Meredell has
also installed a concrete gravity solids settling basin that can be cleaned with their front-end
loader. This was done per their own initiative.
The Proposed New Waste Management Plan
1. Environmental Engineering Services has been consulting with Meredell Farm to explore
new and innovative alternatives to the. Hoffland Environmental system for about 9 months.
We now think we have the best and most cost effective solution for Meredell at this time.
While we are still exploring new and innovative solutions to the dairy waste treatment
issue, we want to finalize a workable plan for Meredell's dairy waste and proceed with its
implementation.
2. In outline form, the basic aspects we plan to use for waste treatment are as follows:
• Flushed wastewater will flow into a concrete gravity settling basin where the larger- solids
will settle out. These solids will be removed by a front-end loader, allowed to partially
drain, and be stored on a concrete pad waiting removal.
• The partially cleaned water will flow by gravity from the concrete gravity settling basin into
the first of two large earthen settling cells. Many of the finer solids will settle out of the
wastewater in these two settling cells. Water will gravity flow from the first cell to the
second cell.
• Supernatant out of the second earthen settling cell will be pumped over into the large waste
holding pond to be stored until spray irrigated.
• Wastewater will be pumped out of the storage pond and irrigated with a new hard hose
traveler onto Meredell crop land adjacent to the dairy. The amount of land required for this
activity has not been determined, but it will be considerably more than 20 acres.
2

• Separated solids will be either hauled off -site by a composting company or land applied on
crop land. A certified animal waste management plan will be developed which reflects both
solids and liquid management for all of the Meredell waste.
• The Hoffland Environmental equipment will be removed from the system. No waste
aeration will take place at this time.
• There may be a small reduction in the number of animals used in the new certified animal
waste management plan, but it is a little early to pinpoint this number.
1 am ready to put together the plan for the outline referenced above. At this time I need
guidance from DWQ as to what our official request should be. Do we submit a request for a
modification of the existing permit or do we apply for a new and "typical" animal waste
permit? Will the new plan need to be reviewed prior to us making it official or can we proceed
with its implementation as soon as the plan is developed? Who will need to get copies of this
plan and how many copies will they need?
In summary, Meredell Farm has been a pioneer in applying one form of innovative waste
treatment technology on their dairy. So far this innovative technology has not proven
satisfactory and has resulted in a serious financial drain. Meredell has decided to move more
cautiously in the future and be a little more conservative in their approach to waste
management while still maintaining the most technologically feasible and most cost effective
solution possible.
On behalf of Meredell Farm, Thank -You for your continued interest and input. Should you
have any questions about this matter, please feel free to contact my office. We look forward to
your reply.
Best
enclosures
cc: David Meredith
Phillip Wright
Melissa Rosebrock (DWQ)
3
P.E.
AL ENGINEERING SERVICES

§tate of Noah Carolina
Department of 'Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr.. Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 10, 1998
David ML-i�
Meredoll Farm, Inc.
4718 Ramsewr- Julian Road
Liberty, NC 27298
Dear Mr. Meredith:
•
&14�
� E N R
Subject: Permit No. AW1760040
Mereedell Fann, Inc.
Wastewater Spray irrigation
Randolph County
In accordance with your application received October 1, 1997, we are forwarding herewith Permit
No. AW1760060, dated February 10, 1998, to David Meredith authorizing the operation of an animal
waste collection, treattrnent, storage and land application system.
This permit shall be effective from the dale of issuance until February 28, 2003, and shall be
subject to the conditions and Umitations as specified therein. Please pay particular attention to the
Monitoring nequi em -nts in this permit. Failure to establish an adequate systern for collecting and
maintaining the required operational information will result in future compliance problems. Any increase
in flow or increase in stocked animals above.the listed values in this permit will require a modification to
this permit and shall be completed prior to uctual increase in either flow or number of animals.
If any Farts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the
right to request an ad}udicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer
27447. Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands ate made this permit shall be final and binding,
One set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you deed additional
information concerning this matt, please contact Michael T. Lewandowski [phone] extension
362.
Sincerely
�(—A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
W. Randolph County Health Department
Robert O. Hoftlanfd, P.E.: Hoflland Environmental, Inc.
Washing= Regional Office, Water chalky Section
Training and Certification Unit
loon -Discharge Compliance Unit
Donna Moffitt, Division of Soll and Water Conservation
P.O. ft 2MM. Ralfth, Nwth Carolina 27626.0535 Talanhone (41Q4 n'':k..rAk1 PAY 191017!A%A71a

NORTH CA ROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
ANIMAL WASTE OPERATION PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
David Meredith
Randolph County
FOR THE
construction and operation of a 17,892 GPD spray irrigation treatment and disposal facility consisting of
one gravity separation screen, one 4,690,000 gallon biological oxidation pond with an internal clairifier,
20 acres of available sprayfield, and all other pumps, pipes, and appurtenances to serve 2000 dairy cattle
with no discharge of wastes to the surface waters, pursuant to the application received Ok-.tober 1, 1997,
and in conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until January 31, 2003, and ~hall be subject
to the following specified conditions and limitations:
1. The animal waste collection, treatment, storage and transmission system permitted under
this permit shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to
prevent. ft discharge of pollutants to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. If David
Meredith is in compliance with this permit and unintentionally discharges as a result of a
storm event greater than the 25-year, 24-hour storm, the facility will not be considered in
violation of this permit.
2. This facility may not be expanded above the capacity shown in this permit until a revised
permit reflecting the expansion has been issued.
3. A copy of this permit, monitoring forms, and lessee and Iandowner agreements, shall be
maintained at the farm where animal waste management activities are being conducted for
the life of this permit. These documents shall be kept in good condition and records shall
be maintained in an orderly fashion.
4. For all new and expanding operations, no collection or storage facilities may be constructed
in a l tat) -year floodplain.

-r
�► ENVWNMENTAL ENGINEEAG SERVICES
Water • Wastewater • Sludge • Agricultural • Industrial • Civil
RECEIVED
NCDENR o May 10, 20WC. Dept. of EHNR
Division Of Water Quality 0 MAY 12 20
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617 Winston-Salem
Ann: Sue Homewood Regional Office
Re: Update on animal waste treatment activities at Meredell Farm, Inc., Randolph County, North
Carolina. DWQ Permit Number AW1760060.
Dear Ms. Homewood,'
I have recently talked to Ms. Melissa Rosebrock from the Winston Salem Office of DWQ. She and I
discussed the above referenced farm and the April 3, 2000 letter Isent to Mr. Larry Coble. Apparently
there was some confusion generated via that letter, Please find below a clarification of the waste
treatment situation at Meredell Farm.
1. Since Meredell Farm has asked me to help them evaluate their waste treatment: alternatives and
options (i.e. since the first of this year)•they have NOT made any permanent changes to their�basic
permitted waste 'treatment 'system. - The Hoffland Environmental" waste'treatment` equipment': is. still
in`piace", but requires• frequent -repatirs: Hoffland'Envieoiuriental;has-'made'-several'iinprovements to
their'solids' separation' equipment since ° it' was first iiistalleii; 1bizt:'I"can riot' See how this `is ,an
alteration to the original permit.
2. Any modifications made to the Meredell Farm dairy waste treatment system have been done to
improve or enhance the Hoffland equipment, not to change the permitted treatment approach. As
you know, two solids settling cells were installed last year to improve the solids removal efficiency
of the Hoffland solids separator. These cells have done a good job at keeping solids out of the large
waste holding pond, but I do not think the mechanical separator efficiency was improved by this
addition. Again, this was done to enhance the Hoffland System, not to change the waste treatment
approach. N
3. As mentioned in my April 3 letter, the Meredell Farm owners now wish to explore some alternatives
to the Hoffland treatment process. Explore does not mean installed? They have hired
Environmental Engineering Services (EES) to assist them in alternative waste treatment technology
evaluations for this dairy operation. Let me make it clear that this innovative technology
exploration is mostly from university research reviews, vendor conversations, and economic
forecasts. On occasion we will conduct a small on -farm test to "check out a processor a piece of
equipment.." We have. not installed any permanent equipment or process changes at this time.
4. I mentioned'in my'Apri3'-3''ietter:ttiat we`planried'to do,some on=farm testing 'of. various alternate
treatment'technologies:=''Such'testing is, usually. 11-46"5,-days in-fduration�with'a-pilot device or
process; not a month long alteration t6_the'6dsting treatmefivproces§. 16.'Addition t6e�on=farm tests
usually involve only' a` small .fraction of the daily flows.- These are 'tiny experiments to see ; of the
alternate treatment has merit. None of these tests would warrant a permit modification.' For, instance;
P.O. BOX 426, ABERDEEN, N.C. 28315 • PHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]

on April 12 and 13 I assisted Green Mountain Technologies in the on -farm testing of a device called
The Detainer. This is a solids screening device that can be used with or without polymers. We ran
a few thousand gallons of Meredell's cow manure through The Detainer in order to evaluate its
effectiveness at solids removal. We tried it with and without polymers. This two day test helped us
to see if this device is suitable for Meredell Farm. 98% + of the two day manure flow went though
the normal treatment process. When we finished the tests The Detainer was removed from the farm.
Think of these mini tests like a chef taste testing a spoonful of many different soups at a soup cook -
off contest. He is not eating the entire pot of soup from each contestant, only making an evaluation
as to which soup is the best.
5. When we finish our evaluation of the most promising new alternatives I will make a
recommendation to Meredell on which approach best fits into their farming situation. Until that
time we do not plan to change the permitted mode of operation. We will inform DWQ of any
permanent changes or long term trials before these changes are made. In addition, we will adhere to
the standard protocol for permit modifications prior to making such changes. Until such an official
permit change request is made, Meredell Farm will continue to follow their certified animal waste
management plan for nutrient applications developed by the NC Cooperative Extension Service.
I feel as though the desire of Meredell Farm to voluntarily keep DWQ informed about their plans for
waste treatment improvement has somehow raised suspicion about their operation. When Mr. Tommy
Stevens verbally requested that I send a brief update letter to Mr. Larry Coble about this matter, I do
not think he believed it would raise so many questions. I hope that today's letter helps reduce your
concerns.
We will continue to keep DWQ informed on our progress toward treatment improvements when
decisions are made. We will not implement equipment changes to the primary treatment process
without a permit revision request to DWQ. If we plan a significant on -farm test in the future I will call
Melissa Rosebrock to tell her of this test.
Should you have any questions about this matter, please feel free to contact my office. On behalf of
Meredell Farm, Thank -You for your continued interest and input.
Best
a
cc: David Meredith
Phillip Wright
Melissa Rosebrock (DWQ)
p
ENGINEERING SERVICES

NORTH IOLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WINSTON-SALEm REGIONAL OFFICE
April 20, 2000
Mr. David Meredith
4718 Ramseur -Julian Road
Liberty, NC 27298
SUBJECT: Permit Modification
Meredell Farm, Inc. - Facility # 76-60
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Meredith:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of written correspondence from Mr. Larry
Graham, P.E. in our office on April 4, 2000. Mr. Graham wrote on behalf of Meredell
Farm, Inc. to update our office of "the existing system performance" and "plans for
modifications" regarding animal waste treatment activities,
This office appreciates your voluntary efforts to keep the Division of Water
Quality informed of the animal waste management situation at Meredell Farm, Inc.
Note, however, that any change to the wastewater treatment system at the farm requires
permit modification. Please submit a letter requesting modification to the attention of
Sue Homewood, NCDENR Division of Water Quality, 1617 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1617. She may be reached by phone at 919.733.5083 ext. 502
should you have specific application questions. The application may be in the form of a
letter with detailed descriptions, engineering calculations, drawings, equipment
specifications, etc. There is no fee to modify your Animal Waste Permit.
The Winston-Salem Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter.
As always, if we may be of assistance please contact Melissa Rosebrock or me at (336)
771-4608.
Sincerely,
Larry D. Coble
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Sue Homewood - DWQ Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Larry Graham — EnvironmentaI Engineering Services
Phillip Wright —Meredell Farm, Inc. Manager
Randolph County Natural Resources Conservation Service
MROO F�aacili yiMIMI
Central Files
RUSH
rE�
6S5 WAUOMTOWN STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27107
PNONE 336.771-4600 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
�Jj�

Re: letter about rneredell farm
Subject: Re: letter about meredell farm
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 1 1:57:12 -0400
From: Sue Homewood <sue.homewood@ncmail. net>
Organization: DWQ
To: Melissa Rosebrock <[e-mail]>
I'd much rather go with you on vacation, take me ... take me...
enjoy, and don't worry, nothing important ever happens at those meetings (don't tell sonya i spilled the
beans to you though)
Melissa Rosebrock wrote:
unfortunately no ....... of all the people that need to go, huh? i changed my schedule around three times to
accomodate the proposed meeting already.....grrr....... i have a much needed vacation planned during
easter week that was paid for almost a year ago. i truly hate to miss the meeting as i could have gone
ANY other day ....... i just couldn't do anything with three weeks notice and not lose $$. Please pick up
any printed materials they hand out ......i would like to read over them.
ok..... i'm through venting .... ha ha ...... thanks for working with the "rookie ........ hope to meet you soon
though!
Sue Homewood wrote:
probably write him would be better for our records. please copy me on
the letter. it doesn't have to be very formal just an fyi type letter.
thanks melissa!! will i meet you next wed in wilmington?
Melissa Rosebrock wrote:
> be glad to ...... should i call or write to him??
> Sue Homewood wrote:
>
>> Melissa,
»
>> Hi, thanks for sending me a copy of the letter from Larry Graham
>> about
>> Meredell farms. Do you think you could contact him and inform him
>> that
>> any changes to the wastewater treatment system at the farm requires
>> permit modification. he can submit an application for modification
>> to
>> my attention (there is no fee) and it can be in just letter form
>> with
>> descriptions and any engineering calcsldrawings or equip
>> specifications. thanks.
>> Sue
»
of 3 4/ 19/2000 4:29 PM

AECEIVED
ENVI NMENTAL EN INEE -VI .of EHNR
G G SEA ��t
Water - Wastewater - Sludge - Agricultural - Industrial AN10 4 M
Winston-P'aferrm
He.0.4nai Office
NCDENR April 3, 2000
Division of Water Quality - Winston Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem, NC. 27107
Attn: Larry Coble
Re: Update on animal waste treatment activities at Meredell Farm, Inc., Randolph County,
North Carolina. DWQ Permit Number AW1760060.
Dear Mr. Coble,
I have recently been hired to consult with Meredell Farm with regards to their animal waste
treatment system. As you know this farm has been trying to incorporate a new and innovative
approach to their animal waste treatment. Mr. David Meredith, one of the owners of the farm,
requested I call Mr. Tommy Stevens (Director of DWQ) and verbally update him about the
existing system performance and our plans for modifications. Mr. Stevens requested I write the
regional office with this update. Below you will find this information.
Meredell Farm has been making at attempt to remove solids from their animal waste flush
system and then aerate the filtered effluent in an existing waste holding pond. Using this
general process, their plans were to reduce nitrogen to the point where the treated effluent
could be land applied on about 20 acres of grassy spray field. DWQ issued Meredell Farm a
permit for this new and innovative system on February 10, 1998. Please review their file if
you need additional information about the DWQ permitted treatment process.
2. Hoffland Environmental, Inc. worked with Meredell Farm to obtain the above referenced
permit. Hoffland also installed the innovative treatment system and for the last 2 years has
been working with Meredell to achieve the treatment levels originally predicted. Several
modifications have been made to the system since it was first installed in an effort to
improve performance.
3. Some success has been achieved at Meredell Farm using the Hoffland Environmental
methodology and equipment. However, the level of effluent treatment has been less than
predicted, being hampered by equipment breakdowns, etc.
4. The Meredell Farm owners now wish to explore some alternatives to the existing process.
They have hired Environmental Engineering Services (EES) to assist them in alternative
waste treatment technology evaluations for this dairy operation. At this time it is not clear
if we will continue to use all of the Hoffland Environmental Equipment, part of it, or
completely switch to a new methodology.
P.O. BOX 426, ABERDEEN, N.C. 28315 - PHONE [phone] - FAX [phone]

r
r �
S. As DWQ knows, there is no animal waste treatment and disposal alternative that is as cost
effective as traditional methods. At least I have not been able to find such an alternative.
This does not mean that many of the much publicized alternatives do not work at reducing
nutrients in animal waste, but it means that we must consider not only the treatment process
but the economics of the process and the manpower requirements of the process on a day-
to-day basis. Farmers face real market forces, seasonal cash flow problems, and resource
management problems that many municipalities do not face. Thus traditional industrial or
municipal waste treatment alternatives do not easily translate to farm use. This mandates
we consider affordability and functionality when considering alternative treatment systems.
b. At this time I have identified three possible treatment technologies that might work at
Meredell Farm. We have some on -farm testing to perform before we know the operational
and/or economic characteristics of these systems. Our plans are to perform these on -site
tests within the next 2 or 3 months and then submit a new animal waste management plan
to DWQ for review.
7. Until we can more fully evaluate the new alternatives, Meredell Farm will continue to
follow their certified animal waste management plan for nutrient applications developed by
the NC Cooperative Extension Service. They are still using as much of the existing
innovative system as is practical and are managing their dairy waste in a prudent and
responsible manner.
This letter is a voluntary effort to keep DWQ informed about Meredell Farm's animal waste
management situation. We will continue to keep DWQ informed on our progress toward
treatment improvements when decisions are made. Meredell Farm has not expanded their herd
size to the permitted level and will not do so until they have a system that will accommodate
such a level of waste production.
Should you have any questions about this matter, please feel free to contact my office. On
behalf of Meredell Farm, Thank -You for your continued interest and input.
cc: David Meredith
Phillip Wright
Melissa Rosebrook (DWQ)
.E.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES

r
NORTH CAROLINA 40
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
:NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
1�
won&
DEN R'
FAX TRANSMITTAL.
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27107
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
FAX NUA4BEF: 6,; %• 0 /b,$l
FROM:.
DATE:
1aZ/o6
Number of pages (including cover page}:
COMMENTS:

State of North Carol
Department of Envir ment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
David Meredith
Meredell Farm, Inc.
4718 Ramseur- Julian Road
Liberty NC 27298
Dear David Meredith:
1
6VFWJ W1 � •
0V
NCDENR
.NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 P F C 71 V E
N.C. :'r:7i. of EHNR
JA N 0 5' 2000
Winston-Salem-,
Regional OHIGM
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 76-60
Randolph County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Randolph County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycledt10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolin:b
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NCDENR
NORTH GROLINA bEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 11, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED N . f
Iris Meredith __ S E P 8 1998.
4718 Ramseur Julian Road
Liberty NC, 27298 W i !� S'to ►l--'tead i e A
Regional Officei I
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Meredell Farm Inc.
Facility Number: 76-14
Randolph County
Dear Iris Meredith:
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for
Special Agreement which was received on March 2, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with Iris Meredith in order
to allow additional time for Iris Meredith to obtain and implement a certified animal waste
management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the .
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunde`r.'.All dates
and conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to'61vil penalties, criminal
penalties, injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality:
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 581 or Mr. Steve Lewis at (919).733-5083 ext. 539.
Sincerely,
A Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
WSRO Regional Office
Dewey Botts -- Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIR&ENTAL MANAGEMENT COSION
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 76-14
IRIS MEREDITH
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this -
Special Agreement is entered into by Iris Meredith, hereinafter referred to as "OWNER",
and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency of the State
of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21. " "
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph I(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by October 31, 1998.

Farm Number: 76-14
Special Agreement
Page 2
•
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER' will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties; or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 76-14 S
Special Agreement
Page 3
•
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Meredell Farm Inc.
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

_,
,j M
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 10, 1998
David Meredith
Meredell Farm, Inc.
4718 Ramseur- Julian Road
Liberty, NC 27298
Dear Mr. Meredith:
1:3 FE N F=1
RECEIVED
R.C. DePt. of EHNR
FEB 16 1993
Regional Offica-
Subject: Permit No. AW1760060
Meredell Farm, Inc.
Wastewater Spray Irrigation
Randolph County
In accordance with your application received October 1, 1997, we are forwarding, herewith Permit
No. AWI760060, dated February 10, 1998, to David Meredith authorizing the operation of an animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until February 28, 2003, and shall be
sub.lect to the conditions and limitations as specified therein. Please pay particular attention to the
monitoring requirements in this permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required operational information will result in future compliance problems. Any increase
in flow or increase in stocked animals above the listed values in this permit will require a modification to
this permit and shall be completed prior to actual increase in either flow or number of animals.
If anv parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have' the
right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.Q. Drawer
27447. Raleizli. NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
One set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you need .additional
information concerning this matter, please contact Michael T. Lewandowski at [phone] extension
362.
Sincerely, %
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Randolph County Health Department
1v Robert O. Hoffland, P.E.: Hoffland Environmental, Inc.
Li IeF4 1 ting" Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Training and Certification Unit
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Donna Moffitt, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

9 0
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
ANIMAL WASTE OPERATION PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
David Meredith
Randolph County
FOR THE
construction and operation of a 17,892 GPD spray irrigation treatment and disposal facility consisting of
one gravity separation screen, one 4,690,000 gallon biological oxidation pond with an internal clairifier,
20 acres of available sprayfield, and all other pumps, pipes, and appurtenances to serve 2000 dairy cattle
with no discharge of wastes to the surface waters, pursuant to the application received October 1, 1997,
and in conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until January 31, 2003, and shall be subject
to the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The animal waste collection, treatment. storage and transmission system permitted under
this permit shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to
prevent the discharge of pollutants to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. if David
IMeredith is in compliance with this permit and unintentionally discharges as a result of a
storm event greater than the 25-year. 24-hour storm, the facility will not be considered in
violation of this permit. -
This facility may not be expanded above the capacity shown in this permit until a revised
permit reflecting the expansion has been issued.
A copy of this permit, monitoring forms, and lessee and landowner agreements, shall be
maintained at the farm where animal waste management activities are being conducted for
the life of this permit. These documents shall be kept in good condition and records shall
be maintained in an orderly fashion.
4. For all new and expanding operations, no collection or storage facilities may be constructed
in a 100-year lloodplain. 4

0
5. Upon completion of construction and prior to o eraaof this permitted facility, a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted
facility has been installed in accordance with this permit, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials. Mail the Certification to the Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, NC 27626-0535.
6. The Winston-Salem Regional Office, telephone number [phone], shall be notified
at least forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an in -
place inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made
during the normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday,
excluding State Holidays.
7. The spray irrigation facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times so that
there is no discharge to the surface waters, nor any contamination of ground waters which
will render' them unsatisfactory for normal use. In the event that the facilities fail to
perform satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance conditions or failure of the
irrigation area to adequately assimilate the wastewater, the Permittee shall take immediate
corrective actions including those actions that may be required by the Division of Water
Quality, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater treatment and
disposal facilities. Failure of the wastewater treatment facilities to adequately reduce
nitrogen to the level utilized in the permit application will require the addition of land or
reduction in animal population such that the amount of nitrogen produced does not exceed
the amount utilized. .
8. The following buffers shall be maintained:
a) 400 feet between wetted area and any residence or places of public assembly under
separate ownership,
b) 150 feet between wetted area and property lines,
c) 100 feet between wetted area and wells,
d) 100 feet between wetted area and drainageways or surface water bodies,
e) 50 feet between wetted area and public right of ways,
f) 100 feet between wastewater treatment units and wells, and
g) 50 feet between wastewater treatment units and property lines.
It. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
I . The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and land application equipment and sites
shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
2. A suitable vegetative cover shall be maintained on all land application sites and buffers in
accordance with the permit. No waste may be applied upon fields not approved by or
prepared in accordance with the pert -nit.
3. An acceptable pH of the soil shall be maintained on' all land application sites to insure
optimum yield for the crop(s) being grown.
4. The Plant Available Nitrogen application rates and hydraulic loading rates, identified in the
permit application, shall not be exceeded.
5. Application of animal waste onto land:
a. which is used to grow food or fiber crops for direct human consumption that does
undergo further processing shall not occur within 30 days of the harvesting.
b. which is used to grow food or Fiber crops for direct human consumption (e.g.,
strawberries, melons, lettuce, cabbage. apples, etc.) that does not undergo further
processing shall occur preplant , but not during the growing season, or in the case of
fruit bearing trees, shall only be applied prior to breaking dormancy.
2

0 0 M
6. Application of animal waste onto land which is conventionally tilled and with no actively
growing cover crop (bare soil) shall be incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after
application. This does not include fields that utilize conservation tillage practices.
7. Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be
discharged into the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and transmission system.
Washdown of stock trailers, owned by and used to transport animals from this farm only,
will be permissible as long as system design accommodates the additional flow and as long
as only those detergents and disinfectants are utilized which are labeled by the manufacturer
as readily biodegradable.
8. Disposal of dead animals shall be done in accordance with the North Carolina Department
of Agriculture (NCDA) Veterinary Division's regulations.
9. Grazing animals on an application site shall be controlled in accordance with Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Standards.
10. All uncontaminated stormwater runoff from the surrounding property and buildings shall
be diverted away from the animal waste lagoons and storage ponds to prevent any
unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the structures.
11. A protective vegetative cover shall be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon
embankments, berms, pipe runs, erosion control areas, etc.) Emerging vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon dikes or
sideslopes. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
12. The residuals generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed in accordance with
11
General Statute 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the Division of Water Quality.
13. Solid materials including, but not limited to, bottles. light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any
other solid waste from the animal waste operation shall be prevented from entering_ the
treatment/stora,,e lagoon and shall be disposed of properly.
14. The facility must have -at all times (a) adequate animal waste application and handling
equipment on site, (b) a lease for the use of the necessary equipment, (c) a contract with a
third party applicator capable of providing adequate waste application, or (d) a contract for
the purchase of the equipment. In all cases, the equipment and any contractor must be
capable of land applying the waste on the sites specified in this permit in compliance with
both the agronomic and hydraulic loading rates for the sites.
15. No traffic or equipment shall be allowed on the disposal area except while installation
occurs or while normal maintenance is beinc, performed.
16. The following are approved sites for animal waste application (see attached map(s)):
Application Area [acres]
Field No. Owner/Lessee (excluding buffers)
6 David Meredith 20
Total 20

e.,0 0
I II. MONITORING AID REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Adequate records shall be maintained by the Permittee tracking the amount of wastewater
disposed. These records shall include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following
information:
a. date of irrigation, .
b. volume of wastewater irrigated,
c. field irrigated,
d. length of time field is irrigated.
2. Waste collection, treatment, storage and transmission structures (i.e. piping, pumps, reels,
etc.), under the control of the owner/operator shall be inspected weekly. Lagoon berms,
storage ponds, and structures should be inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, animal .
damage or discharge. A written chronological record of maintenance and repairs shall be
maintained on the farm and be made readily available during a scheduled inspection of the
farm.' These records'shall also be made available at the request of the Division. All repairs
shall be approved by a technical specialist prior to initiation and completed promptly. If a
piece of equipment is being replaced with a piece of equipment -of the identical
specifications, no technical specialist approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves,
pumps (if the GPM capacity is not being increased or decreased), etc.]. Any major
structural repairs (to lagoons or waste storage ponds) shall have the approval of a technical
specialist. y
If not already installed at this facility, a level gauge shall be installed within 60 days of
issuance of this permit to monitor waste levels. This gauge shah have readily visible
permanent markings indicating the maximum lagoon levels at which pump -out must begin,
end of pump -out, and freeboard elevations. Where storage ponds are utilized, only a gauge
with visible permanent markings indicating the pump -out begin and freeboard elevations
need be installed. Caution must be taken not to damage the integrity of the liner when
installing the gauge. Waste lagoon and storage pond levels shall be recorded weekly.
4. A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis shall be conducted annually on each
application site receiving animal waste. The results of these tests shall be maintained on file
by the Peri-nittee for a minimum of five years and shall be made available to the DWQ upon
request.
An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the influent, after screening, and lagoon
effluent shall be conducted initially after issuance of the permit and thereafter as close to the
time of each waste application as practical. This test shall be conducted as close to the time
of application as practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of
application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitroc,en Zinc y
Phosphorous Copper
6. Proper records, including maintenance, repair and inigation records, shall be maintained on
site and in chronological and legible form for a minimum of five years by the Permittee.
These records shall be maintained on forms provided by the DWQ and shall be readily
available for inspection.
4

Regional Notification:
The Pen-nittee shall report by telephone to the Winston-Salem Regional Office, telephone
number [phone], as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following
first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events:
a. Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters.
h. Any failure of the animal waste treatment and disposal program that renders the facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the animal waste and/or sludge.
C. Spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting animal waste or
sludge to the application sites which results in, or may result in, a discharge to surface
waters.
d. Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon system or storage pond that poses an immediate
threat to the environment.
C. Failure to maintain adequate storage capacity in a lagoon or storage pond that poses an
immediate threat to public health or the environment.
f. Overspraying animal waste either in excess of the limits set out in the permit application
or where runoff enters waters of the State.
9. Any discharge that bypasses a lagoon system or storage pond.
For any emergency which requires immediate reporting after normal
business hours, please contact the Division of Emergency Management at
1-800-858-0368.
The permittee shall also file a written report of the occurrence in letter form within 5 days
following first knowledge of the occurrence, unless waived by the Regional Office. This
report shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to
ensure that the problem does not recur.
IV. GROUNDWATER REQUIREMENTS
1. The Groundwater Compliance Boundary for the disposal system constructed after
December 31, 1983, is established at either (1) 250 feet from the waste structures and from
the waste disposal area, or (2) 50 feet within the property boundary, whichever is closest to
the waste structures and the waste disposal area. If this facility was constructed prior to
December 31, 1983, the Compliance Boundary is established at either (1) 500 feet from
the waste disposal area, or (2) at the property boundary, whichever is closest to the waste
disposal area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to immediate remediation action in addition to the penalty
provisions applicable under the North Carolina General Statutes.
Any groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall be
provided.
V . INSPECTIONS
The Permittee or his designee shall inspect the wastewater treatment and disposal facilities
to prevent malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and discharges which may cause
or lead to the release of wastes to the environment, a threat to human health, or a nuisance.
The Permittee shall keep an inspection- log or summary including at least the date and time
of inspection, observations made, and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken
by the Permittee. This log of inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee for a period
of three years from the date of the inspection and shall be made available upon request to
the Division of Water Quality or other permitting authority.

2. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Water Quality
may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or place on
or related to the disposal site or facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit, may inspect or copy any records that must be
maintained under the terms and conditions of this permit, and may obtain samples of
groundwater, surface water, or leachate.
V 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for damages
to surface waters or ground waters resulting from the operation of this program.
2. The Permittee shall designate and employ a certified animal waste management system
operator to be in charge (OIC) of the animal waste management system. No animal waste
management system shall be operated unless supervised by the 01C.
The operating level of lagoons and other uncovered waste. containment structures must not
exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain at a minimum a 25-year, 24-hour
storm event, chronic rainfall, plus an additional I foot of freeboard.
4. Upon reasonable cause to believe that any activities conducted pursuant to this permit may
cause or contribute any waste, directly or indirectly, to be intermixed with the waters of the
State, the DWQ may require any monitoring (including but not limited to groundwater,
surface water, sludge, soil and plant tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity,
quality, and effect of such waste upon the waters of the State. Such monitoring, including
its scope, frequency, duration and any sampling, testing, and reporting systems, shall meet
all applicable Commission requirements.. "Reasonable Cause" may be based on the
findings of a related -Federal. State, Commission or DENR authorized study or report, or
on showing that violations of State water quality or other applicable environmental
standards have occurred or may occur.
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the
Permittee to an enforcement action by the DWQ in accordance with North Carolina General
Statutes and may include the addition of treatment or storage units, the removal of animals
from the site, or the addition of land application sites.
6. The issuance of this permit does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply
with all applicable statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances (local, state, and federal).
7. 1f animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for developing, implementing and completing a "closure plan" which will
eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, erosion, and the potential for
injury and shall be in accordance with NRCSylagoon closure standards in effect when the
closure plan is developed and implemented. Closure shall also include notifying the DWQ.
S. The annual permit fee shall be paid by the Permittee within thirty (30) days after being
billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly constitutes grounds for revocation
of this permit.
9. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
agreements shall constitute grounds for revocation of this permit.
10. This permit shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with
the conditions of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting
data.
11. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes described in
this permit for David Meredith's Meredell farm.

12. This permit is not automatically transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities
to change ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request
must be submitted to the Division of Water Quality accompanied by an application fee,
documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting materials as may be
appropriate. The approval of this request will be considered on its merits and may or may
not be approved.
13. A set of approved plans and specifications for the subject project must be retained by the
Permittee for the life of the project.
14. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall request its
extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review the adequacy of the
facilities described therein, and if warranted, will extend the permit for such period of time
and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate.
Permit issued this the loth day of February, 1998
NORTH CA INA ENV ONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
iL/—A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AW1760060

Permit No. AW1760060
February 10, 1998
ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the
project,
Project Name
Location
for the
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation
of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and
intent of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature Registration No.
Date
8

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
5 February 1998
Mr. Phillip Wright
Meredell'Farm, Inc.
4718 Ramseur Julian Road
Liberty, NC 27298
SUBJECT: Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Meredell Farm, Inc. 476-14
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Wright:
In the next few days, you will be receiving a certified
letter from our Raleigh Office informing you that your
facility was not certified by the December 31, 1997
deadline., In the letter, you will be asked to respond in
writing back to the Raleigh Office informing them of the
reasons why your facility was not certified by the deadline.
Attached to the letter will be an application for a
"Special Agreement". This agreement will allow you to set a
schedule for you to follow to complete the necessary
improvements or construction activities required in your
waste management plan prepared by NRCS or Soil and Water
Conservation. The Environmental Management Commission in
Raleigh will review and approve the schedule you propose.
Please complete the application when you receive it and
return it to the address found on the last page of the
Raleigh .letter.
If you do not understand what you need to do, or need
any assistance completing the application form, please call
me at [phone] and we will work together to,make sure
all the necessary paperwork is completed.
Thanks,
W. Corey Basinger
Environmental Engineer
CC: Randolph Co. NRCS/SWCD
Central Files
1: WSRO )
585 WAUQHTOWN STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27107
PHONE[phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLEOl10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER /

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor -11 IL
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary C
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director C E NR3E!VRA)
December 18, 1997
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
David Meredith
Meredell Farm, Inc.
4718 Ramseur- Julian Road
Liberty, NC 27298
Dear Mr. Meredith:
DEC 2 3 1997
win Eton-salem
Regional CfficO.
Subject: Application No. 76-060
Additional Information Request
Meredell Farm, Inc.
Animal Waste Operation
Randolph County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review, of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the
following by January 17, 1998:
1 } Item IVA of the permit application states that "water from cleaning and sanitizing of milking
parlor" will be added to the animal waste stream. Please submit the names of the cleaning
and sanitizin, compounds that will enter the waste treatment system. Please explain the
impact that these compounds will have on the treatment efficiency of the waste treatment
system.
2) Item V.5 of the permit application was left blank. Please describe which measures are being
implemented to prevent an adverse impact to water quality in the event of a power failure at
the facility.
3) In section F of the permit application, a 45 day temporary storage capacity was selected.
Please submit the rationale as to why this value was selected.
4) The soil evaluation report that was included in the permit application package was not signed
by a licensed soil scientist. Please submit a soil evaluation report signed by a licensed soil
scientist.
5) Please submit the actual (not average) instantaneous application rate that is.proposed for the
facility.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information.
All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address
below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before January 17, 1998, or the
Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your
facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 'telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

•
•
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid
permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 362.
Sincerely,
Michael T. Lewandows J
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
Robert Hoffland, Hoffland Environmental, Inc.

CC: Permits and Engineering
Technical Support Branch
Randolph County Health Dept.
Central Files
;, SRO^)
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No XX
If Yes, SOC No.
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Mike Lewandowski
Date: 13 October 1997
NON DISCHARGE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County Randolph
Permit No. WQ n/a
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: Meredell Farms
4656 Ramseur Julian Road
Liberty, NC 27298
2. Date of Investigation: 09 October 1997
3. Report Prepared by: W. Corey Basinger
Environmental Engineer
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number:
* Mr. David Meredith, Owner [phone]
* Mr. Phillip Wright, Certified Operator [phone]
5. Directions to Site: 3/4 mile north of NCSR 2261 on NCSR 2442
(Ramseur -Julian Road) north of Melanchton.
G. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading):
The site consists of over 600 acres.
7. Topography (relationship to 100 year flood plain included):
Most of the site is above the 100 year flood plain.
Attach a U.S.G.S.,map extract and indicate.facil.ity site.
U.S.G.S. Quad No. D-20 SW U.S.G.S. Quad Name Grays Chapel
Latitude: 35' 51' 20" Longitude: 79' 38' 36"

-8. Any buffer conflicts with location of nearest dwelling and
water supply well? Yes _ No X If Yes, explain:
r.9. Watershed Stream Basin Information: Sandy Creek
a. Watershed Classification: Class C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03--06-09
C. Distance to surface water from disposal system
Several hundred feet
Part II -- DESCRIPTION OF WASTES AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume: 0.130 MGD .(Design Capacity)
Residuals: 2.555 tons per year
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: N/A
100% animal waste (dairy)
C. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
in development approved
should be required not needed
2. Treatment Facilities
a.. What is the current permitted capacity of the facility?
Not currently permitted
b. What is the actual treatment capacity of the current
facility (design volume)?
C. Please provide a description of existing or
substantially constructed wastewater treatment
facilities; Lagoon/waste storage pond
d. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities. The existing lagoon will be
converted into a controlled active biological treatment
system. The lagoon level will fluctuate between 5.4
and 7.4 feet permitting the treated water to accumulate
in the lagoon. The excess water will be irrigated on
designated fields. System is designed to.reduce BOD5
and Nitrogen levels to below 20 mg/l.
3. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Any
residuals will be removed and utilized by a third party
to be named at a later date. The solids from the animal
waste will be sold as "packaged cattle manure".
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DWQ
Permit No.
6

Residuals Contractor
Telephone No.
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP
Other
C. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet). Class I
4. SIC Code(s): 0241
Primary _ -LB Secondary
Main Treatment Unit Code: 3 1 0 x 3
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds (municipals only)? No
2. Special monitoring requests: None at this time
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate) Must be certified by December 31, 1997.
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. - Other Special Items: None
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
I conducted a routine inspection at this site.(76-14) and
found the facility in excellent condition. The facility is very
well maintained and operated. During this inspection, the
certified operator, Mr. Phillip Wright, explained the details of
the proposed system. It appears that this is a viable
alternative to a conventional lagoon system for handling dairy
wastes.

WSRO recommends issuance of this permit in accordance with
current Division guidelines and policies,.in conjunction with
approval from Permits and Engineering's Non --Discharge Group,
Environmenta Engine
Water Quality Su rvisor
/3 1 s
Date
Date

RATING SCALE FOR CLASSIFICATION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS
Name of Facility_��+-" FdRM f+'.ti•
Owner or Contact Person: ^DA-4td me-zefltmA
Mailing Address: "5fP Q�gWk -�o6tpwl Qua, tjaeR-M , Nc. .Z-'?A�
County: _ R,&,4o*L^A Telephone: %to - to zz - z4�t3
Present Ciassifidatlon: New Facility Existing Faclllty
NPDES Per. No. NC 00 Nondisc. -Per. No.WQ Health Dept.Per No.
Rated by: W .CAe_ s� ��� Telephone:jig-4-k - &ad Date: r3 �4gn-
Reviewed by:: Health Dept. .Telephone:
Regional Office Telephone: -77 — o
Central Office Telephone:
ORC:. WRiGmT _ _ Grade: Telephone:
Check Classification(s): Subs a Spray Irrigation Land Application
Wastewater Classification: (Circle On I' It III IV Total Points:-
jN-PI_ANT PROCESSES AND REI ATED C0NTRCX EQUIPMEMN11CN ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCT1oNtMBE
i Y OF SEEM TANK
AND GF39Vr1Y NrrRlFF TION uNE�ARE EXEmEl ERO►v1 cLASsimATION-
SUBSURFACE CLA,SSIFiCATION
(check all units that apply)
i. septic tanks
2. pump tanks
3. siphon or pump -dosing systems
4. sand filters
5, .;-ease irapAnterceptor
6 oil/water separators
7. gravily subsurface treatment and disposal:
a. pressure subsurface treatment and disposal
SPRAY IRRIGATION CLASSIF>CATION
(check all units that apply)
I. -preliminary
treatment (definition no. 32 )
2.
lagoons
3.
septic tanks
4.
pump tanks
5,
pumps
6.
send filters
7.
grease trapAnierceptor
e.
oil/water separators
9.
disinfection
10.
chemical addition for nutrient/algae control
11.
spray Irrigation of wastewater
In addition to the above classifications, pretreatment of wastewater In excess of these components shall
be rated using the point rating system and will require an operator with an appropriate dual certification.
LAND APPLICATION/RESIDUALS CLASSIFICATION (Applies only to permit holder)
1. Land application of biosolids, residuals or contaminated soils on a designated site.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY CLASSIFICATION
The following systems shall be assigned a Class I classification, unless the flow is of a significant quantity or the technology is unusually
complex, to require consideration by the Commission on a case -by -case basis; (Check If Appropriate)
1. OiUwaler Separator Systems consisting only of physical separation, pumps and disposal;
2. Septic TanklSand Filter Systems consisting only of septic tanks, dosing apparatus; pumps,sand filters, disinfection
and direct discharge;
3. Lagoon Systerus consisting only of preliminary treatment, lagoons, pumps, disinfection, necessary chemical ,treatment for.
algae or nutrient control, and direct discharge;
4. Closed -loop Recycle Systems;
5. Groundwater Remediation Systems consisting only of oil1water separators, pumps, air -stripping, carbon adsorption, disinfection
and disposal;
6. Aquaculture operations with discharge to surface waters;
7. Water Plant sludge handling and back -wash water treatment:
8. Seafood processing consisting of screening and disposal.
9. Single-family discharging systems, with the exception' of Aerobic Treatment Units, will be classified if permitted after July 1,
1993 or H upon inspection by the Division, It is found that the system Is not being adequately operated or maintained. Such
systems will be notified of the classification or reclassification by the commission, In writing.

The following scale is used rating wastewater treatment facilito (circle appropriate points)
ITEM POINTS
( 1) Industria€ Pretreatment Units or Industrial Pretreatment Program (see definition No.]3)...................................................4
(2) DESIGN
FLOW OF PLANT IN gpd (not applicable to non-conlarninaied cooing waters, sludge handling facilities for
water purification plants, totally closed cycle systems(ses definition No. 11), and facilities consisting only of hem
(4)(d)
or Items (4)(d) and (11)(d))
0 - 20.000....................................................................................................................... ...... 1
. ...... .....
20,001 - 50,000....................................................................................................................... ...2
50.001 - 1 D0 000 ................................................................................................................. ......
100.OD 1 25 D,000............................................................................................................................... 4
250.001 •'500.000............................................................................................................................
' 500.001 1.000,000.................................................................................................
1.000,001 2,000, 000. ... ..... ..... ....... ...... ..............1 0
2.000.001 (end UP) rats 1 point additional for each 000.000 00d aapaalty UP to a fftsimurn of .................20
flow (gp
IMtNARDesign
(3) PAEL Y LANrrSlPRDCESSES (SO915efinklon No.32)
(a)
BwScroera...............................................................................................................................................I
(b)
or
Mechanical Screens, Static Screens or Comminuting Devices .................. ........................................... :........ 2
(c)
Grit Removal .................................. ............ ................ .................................................................................
or
(d)
Mechanical or Aerated Grit Removal.............................................................................................................2
(0)
Flow Measuring Davica................................................................................................................................1
or
(1)
instrumented Flow Measurement................................................................................................................2
(9)
Preaeratlon...............................................................................................................................................2
(h)
InflueN Flow Equalization..........................................................................................................................2
(i)
Grease ar Oil Separators - Gravity.................................................................................................................2
Mechanical................................................................................................................................I...............3
DissolvedAir Flotation ............................. ........................ ............... ............. .................. ..... I—— ...... .............a
(1)
Prechlonnailon.........................................................................................................................................5
(4) PAIMARYTREATMerr LNITSrPROCESSES
(a)
Septic Tank (sea daflnilion No. 43)............................................................................................................2
(b)
Imhoff Tank...............................................................................................................................................5
(c)
Primary Clarhlers.................................................................................... 5
......................................................
(d)
Sealing Ponds or Settling Tanks for Inorganic Nontoxic Maserials (sludge handling facilities for water
purification plants, sand, gravel, clone, and other mining operations except recreational activities such as gem
orgold mining)......................................................................................................................I.................2
-(5) SECONDARY TREATMENT LNITSRRDCESSES
(a)
Carbonaceous Stage
(1) Aeratlon-High Purity Oxygen System..............................................................................20
DiffusedAir System .............................. ............................................... ........ I.............. .1 0
Mechanical Air Systorn (fixed, floating or rolor)................................................................. B
Separate Sludge Reaeratlon..... :.......................................................................................
(II) TrickIN Finer
HighRate ............. :......................................... ............ ....................................................7
StandardRate...............................................................................................................5
PackedTower................................................................................................................5
(lit) Biological Aerated Fiher or Aerated Biological Filter..........................................................
(Iv) Aerated Lagoons ....................................................................................................... Q1 D
(v) Rotating Biological Contadors...................................................................................... FZ
(vi) Sand Fillers -Intermittent biological...................................................... ........................... 2
Recirculatingbiolaglcal......................................................................................................3
(oil) Stabllizallon Lagoons .................................... :........................................ .......................
(vlli) Clarifier.........................................................................................................................5
(ix) Sin to stage systom for combined carbonacoovs removal of DOD and nlrrogonaus romavel b
nitrtflcatlon (see definition No. 12)(Points for this Item have to be in addition to hems
(5)(a)(1) through (5)(a)(01),
utilizing the extended aeration process (see deflnhlon N0.3a)..........................................2
utilizing other than the extended aeration process ....... ....................................................8
(x) Nutrient additions to enhance BOD removal......................................................................5
(x1) Biological Culture (*Super Bugs')addhion................. .......... :........................ I ................... 5
(b)
Nitrogenous Stage
(1) Aeration - High Purity Oxygen System.....................::.....................................................20
DHfusedAir System..................................:....................................................................10
Mechanical Air System (fixed. floating or rotor).........................................................I........8
SeparateSludge Reaeration............................................................................................3
(11) Trickling Filter -High Rare...................................................................................................7
Standard Rafe...............................................................................................................S
PackedTower................................................................................................................5
(fit) Biological Aerated Filter or Aerated Biological FIller.............................................................10
(Iv) Rotating Blological Contactors ......................................................................................10
(v) Sand Filler - Intarmhont b€dagiwl..................................................................................2
Recirculating biological....................................................................................................3
(VI) Clarifier..........................................................................................................................5
(B) TERTIARY OR ADVANCED TREATMENT LNiTS+PROCESSES
(a)
Activated Carbon Beds -
without carbon regeneration....................................................... ....................... ....................... 5
withcarbon regeneration.......................................................................................................15
(b)
Powdered or Granular AclWled Carbon Feod-
withoutcarbon regeneration................................................................................................ S
withcarbon regeneration................................................... :.................. ................................ 15
(c)
Air stropping..............................................................................................................................................5
(d)
Denhrtfkalion Process..............................................................................................................................10
(a)
Efectrodfafysis............................................................................................................................................5
(1)
Foam Separaliom.......................................................................................................................................5
(g)
Ion Exchange... .... .. ... .. ...... ...... ......................5
(h)
Lard Application of Treated Effluent (sae definition No. 22b) (not applicable for sand, gravel. done
and other similar mining operations) by high rate Infiltration ...................................................... ....•••4
(1)
Microscreens...................................................................................
())
Phosphorous Removal by Biological Processes (See definition No. 26)........................................................20
(k)
Polishing Ponds - without aerallon............................................................................................................2
whhaeration .... .................. ....... ............................... ........ ._........................................5

,.
(1)
Post Aeration • cascade..............................................................................................................................0
(m)
Akdiffused or mechanical..........................................................................................Z
Reverse is .... .............................................................. fi
(n}
Sand or -Media Fihars low rate ................ ............................................................................2
(o)
highrate..................................................................5
Treatment processes for removal of metal or cyanide........................................................I..........................1 5
(p)
treatment processes for removal of toxic materials other than metal or cyanide ..................
(7)
SUMETREATit EW
(a)
"Sludge Digestion Tank - Heated (anaerobic).................................................... ............................................. 10
. .......... ....................................I.........
Aerobic ' ....................................................................................5
........
Unheated(anaerobic).............................................................................................................. ..........3
(b)
SludgeStabilization chemical orlhsrmal
}....
(a)
SludgDryingp Beds •(Gravity ................. ,...,,........,................,....,......................................... ..............2
VacuumAssisted,....................................................................................................I.............................5
(d)
...........
Sludge Elutrfatlon........................................................................................................................:..5
(a)
Sludge Conditioner (chemical or thermal) ........ ......................... ...................... .............................................5
(1)
Sludge Thickener (gravity).........................................................................................................................5
(g) -
Dissolved Air Flotation Unit ;not applicable to a unit rated as(3)(1))................................................ I ............. 0
(h)
Sludge Gas U1111zaflon (Including gas storage)..............................................................................................2
(I)
Sludge Holding Tank Aerated....................................................................................................................5
Non-aerated............................................................................................................................................. 2
(j)
Sludge Incinerator (not Including activeled carbon rage neratian)................................................................t o
(k)
Vacuum Filter, Centrifuge, or Fher Press or other similar dewatering devices...................................................10
(B)
RESIDUALS UfILIZATIONIDISPOSAL (including incineatod ash) '
(a)
LagoOns............................... :................................... ............................... .. 2 ...... ............................... ..........
(b) .
Land Application (surface and subsurface) (see definition 22a)
by contracting to a land application operator or landfill operator who holds the land application permit
orlandfill permit........................................................................................................................................2
(c)
Dedicated Landefll(burfal) by the permittee of the wastewater treatment facility...............................................5
(9)
DEC
CIN
(a)
Chlorinalion..................................................................................................................................I..........5
(b)
Dechlorinalion..........................................................................................................................................S
(c)
Ozone.............................................................................................................................................I........5
(d)
Radiation.................................................................................................................................................5
(1 0)
CHEMICAL ADDITION SYSTEM(S) ( see definition No. 9) (not applicable to chemicat addhlom rated as ham (3)Q},
(5)(a)(xi),
(6)(2), (6)(b). (7)(b), (7)(e), (9a). (9)(b) or (9)(c) 5 points each:
List.....................................................................................................................................5
....................................................................................................................................5
.................................................................................................................... I ...............
....................................................................................................... •..............................
(1 1)
M15 sj.ANEOus UNrr&R]CESSES
(a)
Holding Ponds, Holding Tanks or Settling Ponds for Organic or Toxic Materials including wastes from mining
operations containing nitrogen or phosphorus compounds in amounts significantly greater than is common
fordomesllc wastewater............................................................................................................................4
(b)
Effluent Flow Equalization (not applicable to storage basins which are inherent In land appllcatlon systems) ...... 2
(c)
Stage Discharge (not applicable to storage basins inherent In land application systems)..................................5
( d )
Pumps..................................................................................................................................................f�
(a)
Stand -By Power Supply.........................................................................................................................
(f)
Thermal Pollution Conlrol Device .................. :....................................................................................... . .3
TOTALPOINTS .........................................................................._
ClassI .................. ....... .................................................................................. 5-25 Points
Class11.........................................................................................................26.50 points
Class111........................................................................................................51.65 Points
ClassIV.......................................................................................................66-Up Points
-------------------------------------------------------------
Faciihies having a rating of one through four points, Inclusive, do not require a certified operator.
Facilities having an aclivalyd sludge process will be assigned a minimum ctassllfcatlan of Class II.
Facfihles having treatment processes for the removal of metal or cyanide will be assigned a minimum classification of Class Ii.
Facilities having treatment processes for the biological removal of phosphorus will be assigned a minimum cfassNicatlon of Class Ili.
-------------------------------------------------------------
.0004 DEFINRIONS
The following dofinitlons shall apply throughout this Subchapler.
(1) Activaled Carbon Beds. A physlcailchemical method for reducing soluble organic material from wastewater effluent; The column -type beds used in this
method will have a flow rate varying from two to eight gallons per minute per square foot and may be either upfiow or downitow carbon beds. Cartoon may or
may not be regenerated on the wastewater treatmanl plant she,
(2) Aerated lagoons. A basin in which all solids are maintained In suspension and by which biological oxidation or organic matter is reduced through arlificially
accelerated transfer of oxygen on a Ifow-through basis;
(3) Aeratlon. A process of bringtng about Intimate contact between air or high purhy oxygen In a liquid by spraying, agitation or diffuslon;(3a) Extended
Aeration. An activated sludge process utilizing a_ minimum hydraulic detention time of 16 hours.
(4) Agriculturally managed she. Any she on which it crop is produced, managed, and harvested (Crop Includes grasses, grafra. trees, ate.):
(5) Air Stripping, A process by which the ammonium ion is first converted to dlssaived ammonia (pH adjustment) with the ammonia than released to the
almosphere by physical means; or other similar processes which remove petroleum products such as benzene. toluene, and xylene;
(6) Carbon Regeneration. The regeneration of exhausted carbon by the use of a furnace to provide extremely high temparmures which volatilize and oxidize the
absorbed Impurities;
(7) Carbonaceous Stage. A stage of wastewater treatment designed to achieve 'secondary' effluent limits;
(6) Confrifuge. A mechanical device in which centrifugal force Is used to separate solids from flqulds or to separate liquids of different donsl;:as;
(9) Chemical Addition Systems- The addition of chemical(s) to wastewater at an application point for purposes of Improving solids removal, pH adjustment.
alkalinity control, etc.; the capability to experiment with different chemlcals and different application points to achieve a specific resuh will be considered one
system; the capability to add chemicals) to dual units will be rated as one system; capability to add a chemical at a different application points for different
purposes will result In the systems being rated as separate "ems;
(10) Chemical Sludge Conditioning. The addh Ion of a chemical compound such as time. ferric chloride, or a polymer to wet sludge to coalesce the mass prior to
he application to a dewatering device;
(11) Closed Cyde Systems. Use of holding ponds or holding taroks for containment of wastewater containing Inorganic, non -toxic materials from sand, gravel,
unshed &lane or other similar operations. Such systems shall carry a maximum of two polnis regardless of pumping facilhles or any other appurtenances:
(12) Combined Removal of Carbonaceous BOD and Nitrogenous Removal by Nhriticaslon- A single stage system required 10 achieve permit effluent limits on BOD
and ammonia nitrogen within the same biological reactor,
(13) Dechlodnatlon. The partial or complete reduction of residual chlorine In a liquid by any chemical or physical process;
(14) Denhriticaflan Process. Tire conversion of nhrata-ntrogen to nitrogen gas:

i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
..s
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 1, 1997
MEMORANDUM
To: Steve Mauney
Winston-Salem Regional Office
From: Mike Lewandowski TL
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Subject: Animal Operation
Meredell Farm, Inc.
David Meredith
Randolph County
IN ".
[DEHNR
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
OCT 0 Z 1997
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Attached is a copy of the Animal Waste Operations application package for the subject facility.
Because of this facility's innovative technology, they have submitted an application for an
individual permit. Please provide your comments as soon as possible.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 733-5083 ext. 362,
cc: Permit File
ASSIFGNED TO
E' DA'TF,
0

Rosebrock, Melissa •
From: loshi, J.R.
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 12:43 PM
To: Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC
Cc: Rosebrock, Melissa; Garoma, Miressa; Lawson, Christine; Watts, Debra; Chandler, Rebecca D
Subject: RE: [External] Progress for Koopman Dairies NPDES
Randy,
Thank you for the update. Please keep us updated on the progress of the application package.
I am copying this email to everyone involved for their information as well.
Thanks.
Soil Scientist
DWR Animal Feeding Operations Branch
Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6341 office
6aya.joshincdenr.gov
1636 Mail Service Center
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 12:39 PM
To: Josh!, J.R. <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Progress for Koopman Dairies NPDES
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
report. spam0nc.aov.
Mr. Joshi;
I am currently working with Ard Koopman of Koopman Dairies (AWC760060) in Randolph county to update their
CNMP in preparation of applying for a federal NPDES permit. As this is a massive plan with hundreds of fields
spanning almost 2000 acres these updates, along with our other collateral assignments, will take some time. I cannot at
this moment offer an exact timeline to completion only to say it is being worked on as diligently as possible. As Mr.
Koopman has met with me on several occasions to provide data and inquire about progress I hope there will be no
penalties forthcoming as he has made a good faith effort to get the permit completed. Please let me know if you have
any questions or concerns about th4s project.
1

Rosebrock, Melissa • •
From: Rosebrock, Melissa
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 3:14 PM
To: Joshi, J.R.
Subject: RE: Koopman #76-60 Request for permit expansion
Go for it.....
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
INC Division of Water Resources
INC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
[e-mail]
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.
From: Joshi, J.R.
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 3:13 PM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Cc: Lawson, Christine <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Koopman #76-60 Request for permit expansion
Yes, hey were sent a letter with their enforcement to apply for the NPDES .
The package you got is a copy of what I got. That one is NOT for expansion ( increasing animal numbers) but the expansion of
their storage capacity. Christine has reviewed it from the engineering point, and it is good to go. I was watiign for you to review
it if you have any issues that you would like them to address.
There is no permitting action required at this time.
JI.,
Soil Scientist
DWR Animal Feeding Operations Branch
Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6341 office
lava,
1636 Mail Service Center
512 N. Salisbury Street
I

Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 0 •
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Rosebrock, Melissa
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 3:08 PM
To: Joshi, J.R. <[e-mail]>
Subject: Koopman #76-60 Request for permit expansion
J R,
I have the package sent by Sam Bingham for a STATE permit but it's my understanding that they will get an NPDES
permit..... correct?
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
melissa.rosebrock ncdenr. ov
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.
2

Rosebrock, Melissa 0 • * 0
From: Joshi, J.R.
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2017 2:08 PM
To: Sam Bingham
Cc: Rosebrock, Melissa; Lawson, Christine
Subject: AWC790060 expansion package
Sam,
DWR has reviewed the documents dated October S, 2017 related to the expansion of storage capacity at the
Koopman Dairies, Inc (liberty Dairy, Permit No. AWC79oo60). We found the new storage structure design
in compliance with the current NRCS standards including liner design, embankment, and setbacks.
The facility did not apply for any expansion in the animal numbers at this time. And, hence, no COC is being
issued at this time.
Should you plan to apply for any expansion in the future, please be sure to include a copy of this document
along with a copy of completed certification form and a new waste utilization plan with the proposed number
of animals.
Please let me know I you have any questions.
Soil Scientist
DWR Animal Feeding Operations Branch
Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6341 office
iava.ioshi(docdenr oov
1636 Mail Service Center
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

845 Saber Road T
Rutherfordton, NC 28139
RECEIVEDINCDEQ/DWR
IOCT 16 2017
October 5, 2017 water Quasi
Qperations secttiion a!
Mr. Jaya Joshi
NCDENR-DWR-Animal Feeding Operations
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Dear Sir.
RECEIVF��NC�FQI�WF�
Section
w0�� ations
An Animal Waste Management Plan Certification is attached far Koopman Dairies, Inc. (Liberty Dairy).
The dairy is increasing their storage capacity. The facility is NOT increasing their permitted numbers.
Since permitted numbers are not increasing, the Animal Feeding Operations Permit Application Form is
not included. The Surface Water Classification section of this form is included since a new pond wild be
constructed.
Waste management System design computations are attached. Supporting documents, construction
specifications and drawings included in this submittal
Sincerely,
Samuel C. Bingham, PE
Engineer
Cc: Koopman Dairies, Inc. (Ard Koopman)
Randy Blackwood, NRCS
NC Department of
Environmental Quality
Received
AML OCT 18 2017
Kinston -Salem
Regional Office

• (-'1. r
INCIDENT SYNOPSIS -- CASE NO: DV-2017-0035
ENFORCEMENT ACTION / CIVIL PENALTIES .
FARM NAME: Koopman Dairies, Inc. PERMIT NO: AWC760060
VIOLATOR NAME: Ard Koopman FACILITY NO: 76-0060
COUNTY: Randolph OFFICE: WSRO
Penalty is assessed against a farm owner for wastewater discharge, applying animal waste onto fields
not listed in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), failure to incorporate manure
into bare soil within two days after land application; and failure to consider pending weather
conditions in making the decision to apply waste. .
CASE BACKGROUND
April 6, 2017 — Inspection
Staff from the Winston-Salem Regional Office Division of Water Resources (WSRO-DWR)
performed an investigation on April 6, 2017 in response to an anonymous complaint alleging the run-
off of animal waste from land off Old Red Cross Road in Randolph County. Our investigation
confirmed three different active discharges from a 55-acre tract which was not listed in the CAWMP.
Staff also documented that waste was applied onto bare soil on April 3, 2017 and had not been tilled -in
within 48 hours and that rain had been forecast for the date of application.'
April 21, 2017 - NOV
On April 21, 2017, the DWR-WSRO issued a Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Enforce
(NOV/NOI) to Ard Koopman of Koopman Dairies Inc for:
1) applying animal waste to fields not in the CAWMP;
2) failing to incorporate manure into bare soil within two days or prior to the next rainfall event; and
3) the unpermitted discharge of animal waste into waters of the State.
The NOV/NOI was sent Certified mail and received by Mr. Koopman's wife on May 2, 2017. The
DWR-WSRO received a response from the violator on May 12, 2017.
PREVIOUS VIOLATIONS AND PFNALUES
There is no record of previous violations by Koopman Dairies Inc. under AWC760060 after receiving
permit as a new owner on February 10, 2012.
3000.00 for malting an outlet to the waters of the State without a permit as required
by G.S. 143-215.1., and in violation of Condition 1.1 of General Permit
AWG200000.
1000.00 For violating Condition II.2. of General Permit AWG200000 by applying
animal waste onto areas not included in the CAWMP.
1000.00 For violating Condition 11.7 of General Permit AWG200000 by failing to
incorporate manure into bare soil within two days after land application or
prior to the next rainfall event.

0.0 For violation of permit condition 1I.22. of General Permit AWG200000
by failing to consider pending weather conditions in making the decision
to apply waste.
$5000.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY which is percent of the maximum
penalty authorized by N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A.
$1407.52 _ Enforcement costs
$6407.52 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

Rosebrock, Melissa
From: Joshi, J.R.
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 2:52 PM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa
Subject: RE: Phone call
Yes, l will
Basically, when he called me, he said he is working with the Koopman Dairy. They were sent an NPDES application following
their assessment due to discharge. Obviously, they want to get out of NPDES and hence the phone call from the lawyer. I
explained to him why they were asked to apply. Also, told him that getting an NPDES permit may also cover them form the
federal oversight. He said he will respond by the end of the month. Looks like he has been fishing for the `appropriate' response
from any of us...
Have not heard form him but asked him to contact me if any further questions.
Soil Scientist
DWR Animal Feeding Operations Branch
Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6341 office
iava.ioshiO-ncdenr.aov
1636 Mail Service Center
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Rosebrock, Melissa
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 2:45 PM
To: Joshi, J.R. <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Phone call
Give me a call if you need anything.
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile

melissa.rose_brockCcancdenr.Qov
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.
From: Risgaard, Jon
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:52 AM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa<[e-mail]>
Cc: Joshi, J.R. <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Phone call
He has already spoken with JR. They are trying to figure out future permitting options, as they would prefer not to get an NPDES
permit. You can call JR if you have any questions, or if you have additional insight on the farm.
Jon Risgaard - Section Chief
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Department of Environmental Quality
919-807-6458
http://d` *ric. ov/about/divisions/water-resources
16.36 Mai.,l. Service Center.
Raleigh, NC 27699--1636
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Rosebrock, Melissa
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:19 AM
To: Risgaard, Jon <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Phone call
importance: High
I don't know a Billy Clark, Attorney?
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
melissa. rosebrock@ncdenr_gov
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.

From: Risgaard, Jon
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:12 AM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa <melissa.rose brock ncdenr.eoy>
Subject: FW: Phone call
FYI,
I called Billy back, but had to leave a message. I'll be in touch if he has detailed questions on the case.
Jon
Jon Risgaard -- Section Chief
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Department of Environmental Quality
9.19-80')-6458
http://deg.nc.gov/about/divisi.ons/water-r.esotirces
16.36 Mail Service Center
Rale.i.gh, NC 27699-1636
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Garoma, Miressa
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:05 AM
To: Risgaard, Jon <ion.ris aard ncdenr. ov>; Davidson, Landon <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Phone call
Attached is the summary of enforcement action against AWC760060
From: Risgaard, Jon
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 4:35 PM
To: Garoma, Miressa <[e-mail]>; Davidson, Landon <[e-mail]>
Subject: Phone call
I got a message to call a Mr. Billy Clarke concerning permit AWC760060. Apparently I sent there a letter. Can you provide me
any details on the letter so I can be prepared when I call hill back.
Thanks
,Jon Risgaard , Section Chief
Water Quality Regional. Operations Section
Department of Environmental Quality
919-807-6458
htt.p: //deg.nc. gov/aboLzt/riLv:isi_orts/water-res,:;urces
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 21699-1636
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION:
This form must be completed by the appropriate DWQ regional office and included as a part of the
project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward) in
which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWQ regional office.
Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, with items 1 through 6
completed, to the appropriate Division of Water Quality Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor (see page 6 of 10). At a
minimum, you muse include an 8.5" by I I" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map Into the complete application form and submit the
application package.
6.1 Farm Name: Koopa= Dairies. Inc.
6.2 Name & complete address of engineering fm: Samuel C. Bingham. PE. 845 Baber Road. Rutherfordton. NC 28139
Telephone number: ( 828 ) M - 6798
6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: Sandy Creek
6.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located Randolph County
6.5 Map name and date: Grays Chapel, 1997
6.6 ..NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
,,;.
te
y, ;ffia oa
• �ter• d Tti'-,REGIONAL AQUIFER PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters: 50.ndv L' r-e e- y- - CaLoe- F�e0.x A; vee- $gas in
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission): W
Proposed classification, if applicable: N
Signature of regional office personnel: WSQt1 Date: 1 ,ZO
(All attachments must be signed)
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5

GRAYS CHAPEL QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA—RANDOLPH CO.
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
AO' ,�21 wI7 1810000 FF,F',7; cn-rc;1r311nrra rv, nay
�r� !• �r _ r ; 35'52'30"
% M91 ra'i _ Y'� m �y
•�� ~"� �� ^; ",} 't, - -� �e? 'x r•> .' r;�1 w' 04
J/rf N
l_l ��,,rj�ZrF�,C' : f i {l ,r.� x,'u'-%S..G.'!'"+{ �./ -4 4 r '°'- •.e` ' ^�
,•' � V
.,,,�:""'•,�✓�.'`'•� 'Il'i S,E•"; rf ,.fix $.'.. . A", M._1' _', k- .t' ' 7'R�',•.
oopman Waste Pond 05
421 r
AM
NIV
10
� `�� •,' ....,�� ,(� t � ,;''i F s �. � �- f7a❑off
�� ....r� 1�i s '�� 4•,... hrR•3 �_r. )_�"..y� ,�'�' ^ '.� � l �sF; "'sf"",_ - '� � T t r`, �
J` jj , i • t a rl . Ub A Nandei V _ t 1. ti " + _ _ c
V j r -" � /'r .err - � „M ,V � • _ i t ,�� //..%` � `�y d w.. _ ..'.a. � N� d • ,. a �' �. ��° � Yi
f .4 3
;• t Oil t . t k C ` w.r l
�• `�� '� ' ��` f l . � fJ/�� � � t, �oopman-E?01ry. Freesttiafi�Barn a PaI�S'
�� 1' .�%' �f • � ti t ..� 'Pi. � j ^ � t$
+i` \�:`i � ��'/�Y*:I '�-'...-mi � f � - f�j � �, T�•` � 7 .y #'�1.x� ' '
• tl _ '.,7F r 3 t. lS\.�tli`�
vA -, ��.���� �" �� .iJ "'; ��� y �. � W�•� p�� :r'^ *\�•.\.•:�,.•i ��i;'^� �1 �� ,t, i",��f r ;q� { I�\�`
Wa
1 t �ii � f 4t,,,, 1 ' �� E � f i�' i L,� 1 f .lR i'-''� 1 • ."�'F. t�j _ x� � ' ..% ,.i { - � J(J \
4 W� !>. . �a: -..�i ���+� ��.rS I � +yea\ 1. n T:"'�„y/.,.-.�� .C�r'r, �(�,�+ - !•-
�:( 'i '� _ _� °�R¢_\-"".'fi_ moo\ y^ •�It..r.-��`�� r Y ..
? �� ,� � ¢ _ ``` '.� .,ter �/�,.• �teisnchton �...-�,� ,� �... � (,.ztst
I,S+ \'` +... it 'ns �•�� '���` •:�[ �{I a �.- )j•�•F r4�.r� h-s _ .�j y. O'""�,.., � _
'' 6
� � � i �� ��� sa•.�5�g�f %� --r ty �� ��, .j
100
IN
�+ �v Jff${,tt..� Iz •fir l r'y., ,•'� +'� 7 1`1'��+.J �_ ;••.1•.3 •tV
1 •�`,'e S C a a
24
z [G' mow\ F �� �+�g' S�-a. @ �R'f F �� ! . 1 ; C'__: ',.•... ` _ g�
grrnrinrrr �f.J `Cr i• t .
l ��I ( G � �y l _i� � 1. r. � •'rr 1 ....+y.�-. �--.,
- �� `� I� ' •�� f ` Y� ".� T 1. ' `j�I s ._.^, '----T,`•+,�.,:.:...
r ? '+....i,� .?` �- :� ��� �� �', �- �" 1 j � i �. n Ff1 t 5G6�',� � ••�1..�+ �t��, � � i. i , 1
1
Name: GRAYS CHAPEL Location: 035" 51' 13.7 N 079"38' 2 0' W ,
Date: 7/12/117 Caption: Koopman Dairies
Scale: 1 Inch equals 2000 feet Liberty Dairy
Location Map / / l•� /

NC Surface Water Classifications
Page 1 of 1
Search Stream Name or Lo Q
FA
ea ,"•
° ,.. . � i",... - �� � ! a �` �. -, p��pp ,�: �a ice. g i _ i'x� •�u'"�i � ,. � ¢ � s. -- r � j � ii7`�
.��4'k
��, ,'y s.� _.g & :,.¢♦. �' .^y��"-:i l� ��. ^�'i" aS./' i'�k:.�+1- �A��` r� Ifs+. � � '� ��`�' r F{c SS
�1����j - § j_ ��. E.c++T "°p } .R'�4-...r". ��(� .J�_ t � ,- � � i'w �° � �i _3 �.. �Y� .�: 'r. 3�,,,,,•+'-�p -`♦ , { �,�
tF.• ..v�r� .j •- a � j - ! �+.5�� �/+ c- � � ,�+�i
4F"&' F� �' ,•i 1. i,�,....-r�2. `gy+sgt.
.� • 5..,� a * ', y�..�.+ '.� 1C,.y�!• .t�' ., ; ' i - .ay " 9 .tT I:$,� '�•s
* r ra
4 �+ 'fi n �*-.aa� 4 _ Is �'g' r
IL
tom.!sa-
/'r .'�.`-. � °`�` r � r#� �„�,,..�: �+mn- � f�` �a �/�"�°yk•,F+�`�..e ga;�„.«v.��, a � i, i:.• - `�yr_., *6.�= !,1' �-
601.
t 3i 4r,( '� d '•fp �"" i 3Se t.u. � i. "! 4 '+� Ewa ` i{ �'t '^ L+ ".��
fir'"`•, -ems . ! j "`*•� �,/� ��� y f�-..rf•��
may+ P-, }.p• � �..M� .° _ � �° a �p� '�ji. g+ �.,, ,�,,� y � �, `Y�-\i•s-' !
r
t '!/ Surface Water Classifications:
*r_ i Stream Index: 17-16-(1)
? Stream Name: Sandy Creek
Description: From source to a pointCho
,
0.6 mile upstream of N.C.
s F r • r`
x ti 4 Classification: WS-III a4 R
Date of fiClass.. August 2, 1992
�� to River Basin: Cape Fear
What does this More info
Class. mean?
• �•J6 k-
Zoom
https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6e125 ad7628f494694e259c80dd64265 7/13/2017

NC Surface Water Classifications
Page 1 of 1
Search Stream Name or Lo
1k,
4
41
A
N. _ 3;
Surface Water Classifications:
ItStream
A
Stream Index:
17-16-(l)
Name:
Sandy_ _
Description:
From source to a point
iY '
-���f'l�e
0.6 mile upstream of N.C.
•+4 v a-
i
Hwy. 22
�y 1
Classification:
•i
•'
Date of
August
River Basin:
Cape Fear
g Class. mean?
r ,,p -7 317-01-7 ws R '
Zoom to
i . r
y} i
} • • 4 - - f
1,
https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6e 125ad7628f494694e259c80dd64265
7/ 13/2017

Rosebrock, Melissa
• 0
From: Joshi, J.R.
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 2:52 PM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa
Subject: RE: Phone call
Yes, I will.
Basically, when he called me, he said he is working with the Koopman Dairy. They were sent an NPDES application following
their assessment due to discharge. Obviously, they want to get out of NPDES and hence the phone call from the lawyer. I
explained to him why they were asked to apply. Also, told him that getting an NPDES permit may also cover them form the
federal oversight. He said he will respond by the end of the month. Looks like he has been fishing for the `appropriate' response
from any of us...
Have not heard form him but asked him to contact me if any further questions.
Soil Scientist
DWR Animal Feeding Operations Branch
Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6341 office
iaya.ioshiCcDncdenr.gov
1636 Mail Service Center
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Rosebrock, Melissa
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 2:45 PM
To: Joshi, J.R. <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Phone call
Give me a call if you need anything.
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile

[e-mail]
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.
From: Risgaard, Jon
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:52 AM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Cc: Joshi, J.R. <laya.loshi@ncdenr,gov>
Subject: RE: Phone call
He has already spoken with JR. They are trying to figure out future permitting options, as they would prefer not to get an NPDES
permit. You can call JR if you have any questions, or if you have additional insight on the farm.
Jon Risgaard - Section Chief
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Department of Environmental Quality
919-807-64.58
htj�p //d L_ _.gov/.about/divisions/water-resources
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Rosebrock, Melissa
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:19 AM
To: Risgaard, Jon <ion.ri2gaardl2ncdgnr.gov>
Subject: RE: Phone call
Importance: High
I don't know a Billy Clark. Attorney?
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7064 mobile
melissa._rosebrock@ncdenr,4oV
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.

1
INCIDENT SYNOPSIS — CASE NO: DV-2017-0035
ENFORCEMENT ACTION I CIVIL PENALTIES.
FARM NAME: Koopman Dairies, Inc. PERMIT NO: AWC760060
VIOLATOR NAME: Ard Koopman FACILITY NO: 76-0060
COUNTY: Randolph OFFICE: WSRO
Penalty is assessed against a farm owner for wastewater discharge, applying animal waste onto fields
not listed in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), failure to incorporate manure
into bare soil within two days after land application; and failure to consider pending weather
conditions in making the decision to apply waste.
CASE BACKGROUND
April 6, 2_0.17 — Inspection
Staff from the Winston-Salem Regional Office Division of Water Resources (WSRO-DWR)
performed an investigation on April 6, 2017 in response to an anonymous complaint alleging the run-
off of animal waste from land off Old Red Cross Road in Randolph County. Our investigation
confirmed three different active discharges from a 55-acre tract which was not listed in the CAWMP.
Staff also documented that waste was applied onto bare soil on April 3, 2017 and had not been tilled -in
within 48 hours and that rain had been forecast for the date of application.
April 21, 2017 — NOV
On April 21, 2017, the DWR-WSRO issued a Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Enforce
(NOV/NOI) to Ard Koopman of Koopman Dairies Inc for:
1) applying animal waste to fields not in the CAWMP;
2) failing to incorporate manure into bare soil within two days or prior to the next rainfall event; and
3) the unpermitted discharge of animal waste into waters of the State.
The NOV/NOI was sent Certified mail and received by Mr. Koopman's wife on May 2, 2017. The
DWR-WSRO received a response from the violator on May 12, 2017.
PREVIOUS VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES
There is no record of previous violations by Koopman Dairies Inc. under AWC760060 after receiving
permit as a new owner on February 10, 2012.
3000.00 for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a permit as required
by G.S. 143-215.1., and in violation of Condition I.1 of General Permit
AWG200000.
1000.00 For violating Condition I1.2. of General Permit AWG200000 by applying
animal waste onto areas not included in the CAWMP.
1000.00 For violating Condition 11.7 of General Permit AWG200000 by failing to
incorporate manure into bare soil within two days after land application or
prior to the next rainfall event.

0.0 For violation of permit condition 11.22. of General Permit AWG200000
by failing to consider pending weather conditions in making the decision
to apply waste.
$5000.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY which is percent of the maximum
penalty authorized by N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A.
$1407.52 Enforcement costs
6407.52 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

From: Risgaard, Jon _�.__.__,...__..__.._�u_,....._...._._.___._._.__.____........._._._-_._.•.•..---�.__��.____.�_.._.._....__.�..____._
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:12 AM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa <melissa.rose brock ncdenr. ov>
Subject: FW: Phone call
FYI,
I called Billy back, but had to leave a message. I'll be in touch if he has detailed questions on the case.
Jon
Jon Risgaard -- Section Chief
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Department of Environmental Quality
919-807-645e
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1.636
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Garoma, Miressa
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:05 AM
To: Risgaard, Jon <jon.ris aard(,ncdenr.gov>; Davidson, Landon <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Phone call
Attached is the summary of enforcement action against AWC760060.
From: Risgaard, Jon
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 4:35 PM
To: Garoma, Miressa <[e-mail]>; Davidson, Landon <landon.davidson@ncdenr.€:ov>
Subject: Phone call
I got a message to call a Mr. Billy Clarke concerning permit AWC760060. Apparently I sent them a letter. Can you provide me
any details on the letter so I can be prepared when I call hill back.
Thanks
Jon Risgaard -- Section Chief
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Department of Environmental Quality
919-807-6458
http //_dery nc.clnv/ab()Ut/d.LVisions/water-:resources
1636 Mail Service Center
Ra:t.f::i.C;Y1, NC 2'7699-1.636
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

ROY COOPER
Governor
} MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
April 21, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL No. 7015 0640 0005 8164 0926
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ard Koopman
Koopman Dairies, Inc.
204 Loyd Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Notice of Violation and Notice of Intent to Enforce
N0I-2017-DV-0077
Permit Number: AWC760060
Parcel ID# 8707191668, 8708114338, 8708106667, 7798919504 and 878111770
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Koopman:
On April 6, 2017, Melissa Rosebrock and Patrick Mitchell of the Division of Water Resources (Division)
Winston-Salem Regional Office conducted a site inspection of the above referenced properties in
response to complaints alleging excess odor and the runoff of sediment and animal waste. A copy of
the inspection report is attached for your review.
Accordingly, the following observations and violations were noted:
1. A discharge of cattle waste into Sandy Creek was observed from two different locations of the
application field on the south side of Old Red Cross Road. Sandy Creels is also classified as a WS-III
(water supply) water within the Cape Fear River Basin. WSRO did not receive notice of the
discharge from anyone with Koopman Dairies, Inc. prior to the Division's discovery of the
discharges on March 6, 2017.
On March 6, 2017 Division staff sampled the run-off waste just prior to its entry into Sandy Creek
for fecal coliform, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and nutrients. The results are as follows:
Fecal Coliform = >60,000 col/100mL
BOD = 1,300 mg/L
NHs as N = 47 mg/L as N
NO2+NO3 = 1.2 mg/L as N
Total phosphorus = 23.0 mg/L as P
Total Kjeldahl N =110 mg/L as N
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
450 W, Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
Phone, 336-776-96001 FAX: [phone]

Koopman -- NOV/NOI r `�
April 21, 2017
Page 2
No discoloration was noted in the surface waters upstream of the recently cleared application
area while the surface water was much darker in color, with more discolored foam, downstream
of the denuded application fields, which suggests the discharge was occurring prior to the April 6,
2017 investigation. The unpermitted discharge of animal waste into surface waters is a violation
of condition I.I. of the Cattle Waste Management System General Permit (Permit).
Condition 11.22. also states that "the Permittee shall consider pending weather conditions in
making the decision to apply waste..." You may recall that the National Weather Service (NWS)
forecast for April 3, 2017 was for rain and thunderstorms in and around the application area.
During phone conversations with the Division, Koopman Dairies, Inc. indicated that they "quit
applying waste when it started to rain." Koopman Dairy records indicate that less than 0.50 inches
of rain fell on April 3, 2017 and less than 0.75 inches on the three days following application. NWS
records confirm that the following weather conditions were recorded in and around the area for
April 3, 2017: "Thunderstorms, heavy rain, rain, light rain, fog" and at least 0.70 inches of rain
between April 3-4, 2017. SLUR-2 records indicate that 59,200 gallons of waste was applied to 55
acres of tract 10730 on April 3, 2017 (1,076 gallons per acre).
Division staff also documented sediment run-off from the newly cleared land. This is most likely
caused by the lack of vegetation on the steep slopes and recent rain events. Some ruts have also
formed in the fields and are a conveyance for sediment and waste.
2. The site inspection and records review also confirms that animal waste was applied to fields not
in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). Per submitted application records,
waste was applied to tract 10730. This tract is NOT listed in any of the following versions of the
CAWMP: 3/9/2016; 5/7/2010; 4/17/2008; 8/7/2006.
The inspection also documents that animal waste had been applied to the small grain crop in the
fields across the road (north side of Old Red Cross Road) as evidenced by the waste on the stems
and leaves of the plants and slurry equipment tracks in the fields. Records indicate that Randy Joe
Garner owns these fields and that they are NOT listed in the CAWMP. The application of waste
upon areas not included in the CAWMP is a violation of permit condition 11.2.
3. An unusually strong waste odor was detected in and around the application areas. Our
investigation concluded that animal waste was applied March 25-April 3, 2017 to recently cleared
and denuded land in tract 10730 and not tilled -in until 3/8/2017. Failure to incorporate manure
into bare soil within two days after land application, or prior to the next rainfall event, is a
violation of permit condition 11.7.
Required Response:
Accordingly, you are directed to respond in writing within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of this
Notice. Your response should be sent to my attention at the letterhead address and must include
specific plans and timeline for permanently addressing the following:

'_`Koopman — NOV/NOI • •
April 21, 2017
Page 3
1. Immediately establish a vegetative cover for ALL fields in tract 10730 that received animal
waste. You should also repair the ruts that have formed on the denuded land so that future run-
off might be minimized. A permanent vegetated buffer in the area along the stream should be
created to help prevent further run-off of sediment and manure during rain events.
2. Receiving fields located in the parcels listed above must be approved and added to the CAWMP
prior to ANY future waste application events. If these fields are not deemed suitable for waste
application, then no animal additional waste may be applied.
3. Application records submitted to the WSRO for tract 10730 did not include the required "weather
code." A completed SLUR-1 form, which includes the weather code, should therefore be
submitted to the Winston-Salem Regional Office. We request that you submit application records
for those fields that received waste on the north side of Red Cross Road as well. Please note that
the 12/18/2016 waste analysis used to complete the submitted SLUR-2 form was not conducted
within sixty days of application. Thus, a new waste analysis should be obtained as soon as
possible.
This Office is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement to the Director of the Division
of Water Resources regarding these issues and any future/continued violations that may be
encountered. This office requires that the violations, as detailed above, be abated immediately and
properly resolved. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, these violations and any future violations are
subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to a maximum of $25,000.00 per day for each violation.
Your above -mentioned response to this correspondence, the degree and extent of harm to the
environment and the duration and gravity of the violation(s) will be considered in any civil penalty
assessment process that may occur.
Please contact Melissa Rosebrock (336-776-9699) or me (336-776-9696) if you have questions
concerning this Notice.
Sincerely,
�Al� �_ . lt_/_t'�A
Sherri V. Knight, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ— WSRO
Attachment
cc: WSRO File Copy 5
NCDEQ DWR-Animal Waste Feeding Operations
Randolph County NRCS and Soil and Water Conservation District (via emails)

•
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
760060 Facility Status:
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Complaint
Date of Visit:
04/06/2017 Entry Time: 10:15 am
Farm Name:
Koopman Dairies Inc
Owner:
Koopman Dairies Inc
Mailing Address:
204 Lloyd Rd
Active Permit: AWC760060 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Randolph Region: Winston-Salem
Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident 0
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Statesville NC 28625
Physical Address: 4105 Meredall Farm Rd Liberty NC 27298
Faculty Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 51' 22" Longitude: 79° 38' 27"
Farm address: 4718 Ramseur- Julian Road, Liberty, NCUS Hwy 421 south from GSO. Right onto Old Liberty Rd. Right onto
Ramseur -Julian Rd. Farm is on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ard Koopman Operator Certification Number: 997080
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(a): Name Titie Phone
24 hour contact name Ard Koopman Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Ard Koopman Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa sebracl4 Phone: 2 017
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondlnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
1.Observed animal waste flowing from application fields into Sandy Creek (Water Supply III, Cape Fear River Basin). WSRO-DWR
sampled the run-off waste, just prior to its entry into Sandy Creek, for fecal coliform, biochemical oxygen demand (800), and
nutrients. The fecal coliform result-- >60,000 coU100mL.
2. Site conditions: Temperature=56 degrees F; very windy; partly sunny turner cloudier and colder; very strong waste odor on
areas nearest Old Red Cross Road, Dead worms were observed in puddles of waste In the field. Puddles were very dark in color.
Application tracks from slurry equipment were noted in the fields. Waste had been applied to small grain on fields across the
road. Stream is 10-15 feet wide. Stream water was much darker in color, with more discolored foam, downstream of the denuded
application fields, which suggests discharge had been occurring prior to our arrival today. No discoloration noted in the stream
and tributary upstream of the recently cleared land that had received animal waste.
3.Observed sediment run-off from newly cleared land caused by the lack of vegetation on the steep slopes and the heavy rains on
402017 and 415/2017. Some gullies have also formed and are a conveyance for sediment and waste.
11. Waste was applied to land not in the CAWMP. Regardless, the permit requires that waste be tilled -in within 2 days of
application which began 3/2512017 and ended 413/2017. Waste was not tilled -in until 4/812017.
14. Some of the acreage within the unpermitted tract/fields had an established small grain crop. Waste was observed on the
stems and leaves of the small grain plants.
15. Need to immediately establish a vegetative cover for ALL fields that received animal waste. Many acres are completely
denuded of vegetation.
21. The application records received by the WSRO for tract 10730 did not include documentation of 120 minute inspections. This
will need to be submitted to the regional office.
29. The waste odor eminating from application tract #10730 was stronger than is typical, possibly due to the large amount of
acreage receiving waste in a short period of time.
30. The alleged discharge was reported by a complainant and investigated while the OlClowner was out of town. WSRO did not
receive notice of the discharge from anyone with Koopman Dairies, Inc. prior to our visit on 41612017.
32. Per OIC/Owner'S records, waste was applied to tract 10730. This tract is NOT listed in any of the following versions of the
waste plan: 31912016; 5/7/2010; 4117/2008; 81712006. Tech specialist confirmed that the recently cleared application tract
(#10730), which received the waste, is not in the waste plan. However, Koopman Dairies, Inc. does own this land. Fields receiving
animal waste, located across the road, are owned by Randy Joe Gamer.
33. Spoke to Mr. Koopman about odor complaint on 4/3/2017 while he was traveling out of town. He stated that only a halfAnch of
rain had been predicted for 0410312017. Waste was applied by Mr. Koopman and his certified operators, however, Mr. Koopman
stated that they quit applying when it started to rain. Left message on 4/5/2017 for Mr. Eric Isley, farm manager, stating that we had
now received another call regarding the run-off of manure from the unvegetated application fields. The WSRO did not receive a
return call from Mr. Isley. WSRO spoke to Mr. Koopman again on 0410712017. OwnedOIC said he was "trying to apply waste to stay
ahead of the game" with regards to the weather and the limited opportunities available to apply waste and plant oom in the spring.
34, WSRO may need to follow-up as necessary to ensure compliance.
page: 2

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility: Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
[� Cattle -Milk Cow 5,000
Total Design Capacity: 5,000
Total SSLW: 7,000,000
Waste Structures
Dislgnatsd Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date start Data Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond
04
18.00
96,00
Waste Pond
LARGE WSP #3
P8.00
Waste Pond
LOWER STAGE #2
24.00
Waste Pond
UPPER STAGE #1
12.00
page: 3

Permit: AWC760060
Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc
Facility Number: 760060
inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Discharnes & stream I�cts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
M
❑ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0
❑ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
18-20 gal
min. during
1:46
hr inspection, more prior to
that.
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
M
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
M
❑ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
0
❑ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yoe
No Ns He
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
11 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
11 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na -No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility : Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number:
760060
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Complaint
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 2
No cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑ ■
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Rgcords and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
page: 5

• •
Permit: AWC760060 Owner - Facility: Koopman Dairies Inc Facility Number: 760061)
Inspection Date: 04/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Records and Documents
Yes
LQNNo
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
■
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑4 ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑l ❑
■
Other Issues
Yes No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑l ❑
N
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
0
❑ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
N
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
[� ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
0
1:1 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
■
[� ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0
❑ ❑
❑
page: 6

Rosebrock, Melissa
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Randy,
Josh!, J.R.
Friday, May 20, 2016 9:49 AM
Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC
Rosebrock, Melissa
RE: AWC760060
I saw you revised the Zinc values for Tract 5458 Fields 4 & 5. Are the values also similar for Fields 1 to 3 in that
tract?
Maybe you can also attach form STV Page 10 of 12 to reflect those numbers.
In any case, I will place a reminder on the COC to watch for fields with elevated n levels.
Thanks.
J. R. Joshi
Soil Scientist
DWR Animal Feeding Operations Branch
Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6341 office
Jaya.joshi(a ncdenr.aov
1636 Mail Service Center
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
►: Nothing Compares --,,-
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Blackwood, Randy - NRC5, Asheboro, NC(mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 10:59 AM
To: Joshi, J.R. <[e-mail]>; Sam Bingham ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: AWC760060
Attached are the corrected pages for item 1 second part and item 4. Please let me know if you need anything else.

From: Sam Bingham [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 3:02 PM
To: Joshi, J.R. <[e-mail]_>; Blackwood, Randy - NRCS, Asheboro, NC <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: AWC760060
Mr. Joshi,
Item 1 - 1,452,557 cu ft is storage in Liquid ponds.
Item 3 - Mr. Koopman does not have a manure hauler or marketing agreement at this time. Solid waste will be spread according to waste
utilization plan. I let Mr. Koopman know that a manure hauler agreement or a distribution and marketing permit will be needed if solids are
not spread on cropland.
Item 4 - See corrected pages attached.
Item 1, second part - Mr. Blackwood will provide correction
Item 2 - Mr. Blackwood will provide update.
If you have further questions or need additional information, let me know. Thanks.
Sam Bingham
845 Baber Road
Ruthefordton, NC 28139
828-429-6798
On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 1:58 PM, "Joshi, J.R." <iava.ioshiCcr�,ncdenr.gov> wrote:
Randy and Sam,
am finishing reviewing the request for expansion of the Koopman Dairies permit. A few
comments/suggestions have been noted in various parts of the package. I will appreciate if you could
help correct your portion, as needed:
1. Animal waste Management Plan Certification (Certification): On Page 1, the total storage capacity is
listed as 1, 452, 557 cu ft. Does that include all the liquid and solids storage capacity or just the liquid
portion. Also, on Page 4 of the Certification (Part III.D), the second option has been selected. Does that
mean, the owner does not have his own waste application equipment?
2. High Zn Values: Some fields (ex: Tract 5458) have elevated Zn levels. It is easy for the operator to
lose tract of the Zn levels. Is it possible to exclude those fields form the Plan and still balance the
nutrients?
3. Does Mr. Koopman plan to obtain the services of a manure hauler or a distribution and marketing
permit to handle the solids? It is imperative that he understands the need for such arrangement in
writing. If he does have one, we will appreciate including such information in the Plan.
4. Emergency Action Plan: On Page 13, Winston-Salem Regional Office (WSRO) contact information
needs updating. We are the Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources
now. WSRO phone number has changed to 336-776-9800 now. The next page shows regional office
name as Mooresville. That needs to be changed to Winston-Salem.
Because this is a large expansion, we want to be sure that everything is in place to avoid any confusion.
You may send me further info by email for expediency.
Thanks

J. R. Joshi
Soil Scientist
DWR Animal Feeding Operations Branch
Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6341 office
iaya.ioshi ZDncdenr.nov
1636 Mail Service Center
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any
unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law
and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender and delete the email immediately.

Rosebrock, Melissa
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Cow# Liberty
d ate
12/15/15 1550
1/15/16 1560
2/15/16 1565
3/15/16 1570
4/15/16 1585
5/15/16 1605
Monique Koopman <[e-mail]>
Friday, May 20, 2016 9:54 AM
Rosebrock, Melissa
RE: Tomorrow's Inspection
Rand el man va g pproduction 2016 smallgrairf8_tns%acre --]
Enjoy the weekend,
Monique
From: [e-mail]
To: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Tomorrow's Inspection
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 19:38:38 +0000
See you then!
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
melissa.rosebrock )ncdenr.eov
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
�:'_ 15— Nothing Compares

•
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Monique Koopman [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 3:39 PM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Tomorrow's Inspection
Let's meet in Liberty first
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid
On May 18, 2016 3:12 PM, "Rosebrock, Melissa" <[e-mail]> wrote:
Ard and Monique,
Can't remember if we decided were to initially meet tomorrow. Do you prefer to meet at
Randleman or Liberty farm?
Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Senior Specialist
NC Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
336-776-9699 office
336-813-7084 mobile
melissa.rosebrock(aD-ncdenr.. ov
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
►:;. Nothing Compares-,,,
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Rosebrock, Melissa
From:
Joshi, J.R.
Sent:
Thursday, March 17, 2016 9:59 AM
To:
Sam Bingham
Cc:
Blackwood, Randy - Asheboro, NC; Rosebrock, Melissa
Subject:
AWC760060 WUP
Sam,
I received one copy of the Koopman Dairies waste utilization plan. As you had mentioned over the
phone, this is part of the expansion package you have been working on and the remaining documents
will follow shortly. We will also need a completed State General Permit Certificate of Coverage for
New/Expanding Operations to initiate the review. A blank copy of the application form can be found
at:
hu ps: Z Z de .ne.gov/A L)outdivisions Z water -resources water -resources- erinits wastewater-
branch/animal-feeding-6peration-perm its Zap plications
I did not receive any additional copies to be send to the Regional Office. I am assuming a complete
copy will also be sent to Ms. Melissa Rosebrock at our Winston-Salem Regional Office for her review
and files.
I will let you know when I receive the additional documents.
Thanks.
J. R. Josh!
Soil Scientist
DWR Animal Feeding Operations Branch
Department of Environmental Quality
919 807 6341 office
lava. ioshi(a,)ncdenr.gov
1636 Mail Service Center
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
-/ Nothing Compares ---,-
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

0
Rosebrock, Melissa
From: Monique Koopman <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 9:34 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Rosebrock, Melissa
i
Hey Randy
These are the ads that has to be made for the Liberty dairy (awc 76060)
T4457 field 4 - 5 ad smallgrain crop
T 4592 field 1 - 2 ad corn crop
T 10013 field 1 - 2 ad corn crop and sorgum silage crop
Can you put covercrop in the narrative
Can you adjust fieldsize 4471 field 6 do to new storage pond
For Randleman dairy (awc 760012)
Can you email Melissa Rosebrock that tract 1254 field 4 and 5 are in the plan for corn silage and smallgrain
Thank you
Ard
1

K-cam P W o- N-DA r P-t CS - L l BEA T� -- -476 - 6 0
a
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
m
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbslA)
Canm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Res.
(1bslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsIA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
ga11A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
10013
1
U2
Coronaca
9.40
9.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3131
98
0
0
Broad.
39
0.00
14.69
0.00
138.06
10013
1
U2
Coronaca
9.40
9.40
Corn, Silage
18.4
2115-6130
201
0
0
Broad.
201
0.00
75.31
0.00
707.93
10013
2
U2
Coronaca
5.90
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
911-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
39
0.00
14.69
0.00
73.44
10013
2
U2
Coronaca
5.90
5.00
Corn, Silage
18.4
2115-6130
201
0
0
Broad.
201
0.00
75.31
0.00
376.56
1001541
1
U3
Appling
7.60
7.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.9
911-3/31
121
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
I00I541
I
U3
Appling
7.60
7.60
Corn, Silage
23.8
2/15-6130
259
0
0
Irrig.
259
170.53
0.00
1,296.03
0.00
1001541
2
U3
Vance
10.00
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1001541
2
U3
Vance
10.00
10.00
Corn, Silage
17.1
2115-6130
186
0
0
Irrig.
186
122.47
0.60
1,224.66
0.00
001542
1
U3
Appling
9.60
8.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.9
9/1-3131
121
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1001542
1
U3
Appling
8.60
8.60
Corn, Silage
23.8
2115-6130
259
0
0
Irrig.
259
170.53
0.00
1,466.56
0.00
1001542
2
U3
Appling
9.10
9.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.9
9/1-3131
121
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1001542
2
U3
Appling
9,10
9.10
Corn, Silage
23.8
2115-6130
259
1 0
0
Irrig.
259
170.53
0.00
1,551.83
0.00
10557
1
U2
Badin
4.80
4.80
Fescue Pasture
3.2 Tons
8/1-7131
104
1 0
0
Broad.
104
0.00
38.97
0.00
187.04
10557
2
U2
Badin
5.70
5.70
Fescue Pasture
3.2 Tons
811-7131
104
0
0
Broad_
104
0.00
38.97
0.00
222.11
11136
1
U3
Vance
20.40
20.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.4 Tons
9/1-3131
82
0
0
Irrig_
0
0.00
0.00
0.0o
0.00
11136
I
I U3
Vance
20.40
20.00
Corn, Silage
16.6
2115-6/30
181
0
0
tbrig.
181
119.17
0.00
2,383.48
0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 1 of 32

a
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYF.
Appliic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Obs/A)
Cgmm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Metbod
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManuFeA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
11323
1
U2
Vance
9.80
9.80
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
191
0
Broad.
1 191
0.00
71.57
0.00
701-34
11323
2
U2
Vance
1.30
1.30
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
191
191
0
Broad.
191
0.00
71.57
0.00
93.03
11323
3
U2
on
2.30
2.30
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
811-7/31
155
155
0
Broad.
155
0.00
58.08
0.00
133.58
H323
4
U2
Vance
2.30
2.30
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
160
0
Broad.
160
0.00
59.95
0.00
137.88
11323
5
U2
Helena
11.90
11.90
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
165
165
0
Broad.
1 165
0.00
61.82
0.00
735.70
11323
6
U2
Vance
14.50
14.50
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
191
191
0
Broad.
191
0.00
71.57
0.00
1,037,70
11323
7
U2
Helena
3.30
3.30
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
165
165
0
Broad.
165
0.00
61.82
0.00
204.02
11399
1
U2
Georgeville
15.20
15.20
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
196
0
0
Broad.
186
0.00
69.69
0.00
1,059,32
11401
1
U2
Callison
21.10
21.10
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
156
0
0
1 Broad.
156
0.00
58.45
0.00
1,233.32
11401
la
U2
Georgeville
3.50
3.50
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
8/1-7131
173
0
0
Broad.
173
0.00
64.82
0.00
226.87
11402
1
U2
Georgeville
13.30
13.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
1 109
0
0
Broad.
44
0.00
16.34
0.00
217.27
11402
1
U2
Georgeville
13.30
13.30
Com, Silage
21.2
2/15-6130
227
0
1 0
Broad.1
227
0.00
85.05
0.00
1,131.22
11487
1
U2
Helena
24.50
24.50
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
165
165
0
Broad.
1651
0.00
61.82
0.00
1,514,67
11542
1
U3
Wynott
10.60
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
6.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
74
0
0
Irrig.
D
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11542
1
U3
Wynott
10.60
10.00
Corn, Silage
IIA
2/15-6/30
124
0
0
Irrig,
124
81.64
0.00
816.44
0.00
11813
3
U2
Cecil
30.20
30.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0 1
0
Broad.
45
10.001
16.78
0.00
506.94
11813
3
U2
Cecil
30.20
30.20
Corn, Silage
21.2
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
Broad.1
231
0.00
86.55
0.00
2,613.89
11813
4
U2
Cecil
1.10
1.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
1 112
0
0
Broad.
45
0.00
16.78
0.00
18.46
11813
4
U2
Cecil
1.10
1.10
Corn, Silage
21.2
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
Broad.
231
0.00
86.55
0.00
95.21
11813
5
U2
Cecil
5.50
5.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0 1
0
Broad.
39
0.00
14.69
0.00
80.78
1tl
5
U2
Cecil
5.50
5.50
Corn, Silage
18.4
2115-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
0.00
75.31
0.00
414.22
1 6
1 U2
Wynott
9.80
9.80
Small Grain, Silage
5.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
1 62
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
9.29
0.00
91.06
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 2 of 32

41
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
tD
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Obs/A)
Corm
Fert,
Nutrient
Applied
Ohs/A)
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
an
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manua:
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
11813
6
U2
Wynott
9.80
9.80
Corn, Silage
9.6 Tons
2115-6/30
105
0
0
Broad,
105
0.00
39.34
0.00
385.55
11814
1
U2
Vance
32.30
31.30
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
48.71
0.00
1,524.60
11814
2
U2
Wynott
20.00
19.00
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1.7/31
117
0
0
Broad.
117
0.00
43.84
0.00
832.93
1
U2
Vance
2.70
2.70
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Broad.
34
0.00
12.59
0.00
33.99
r
1
U2
Vance
2.70
2.70
Com, Silage
17.1
V15-6/30
186
0
0
Broad.
186
0.00
69.69
0.00
188.17
2
U2
Vance
5.50
5,50
Small Grain Silage
7.6 Tons
9lI-3131
84
0
0
Broad.
34
0.00
12.59
0.00
69.2
12031
2
U2
Vance
5.50
5,50
Com, Silage
17.1
2115-6/30
186
0
0
Broad.
186
0.00
69.69
0.00
383.30
12033
1
U2
Chewacla-P
2.50
2.50
Small Grain, Silage
NIA
9/1-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12033
1
U2
Chewacla-P
2.50
2.50
Com, Silage
28.0
2/15-6/30
291
0
0
Broad.
291
0.00
109.03
0.00
272.58
12033
2
U2
Chewacla-P
0.50
0.50
Small Grain, Silage
NIA
9/1-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12033
1 2
U2
Chewacla-P
0.50
0.50
Com, Silage
28.0
1 2115-6/30
291-
1 0
0
Broad.
291
0.00
109.03
0.00
54.52
12033
3
U2
Chewacla-P
0.60
0.60
Small Grain, Silage
N/A
9/1-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12033
3
U2
Chewacla-P
0.60
0.60
Com, Silage
2&0
2/15-6/30
291
0
0'
Broad.
1 291
0.00
109.03
0.00
65 42
12033
4
U2
Vance
8.70
9.70
Small Grain, Silage
7.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
78
0
0
Broad.
31
0.00
11.69
0.00
101.70
12033
1 4
U2
Vance
8.70
8.70
Corn, Silage
15.7
2/15-6/30
171
1 0
0
Broad.
171
0.00
64.07
0.00
55T42
12033
5
U2
Vance
1.80
1.80
Small Grain, Silage
7.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
82
0
0
Broad.
33
0.00
12.29
0.00
22.12
12033
5
U2
Vance
1.90
1.80
Com, Silage
16.6
2/15-6130
181
0
0
Broad.
1 181
0.00
67.82
0.00
122.07
12033
6
U2
Cecil
12.30
12.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
1 43
0.00
16.04
0.00
197.25
12033
6
U2
Cecil
12.30
12.30
Corn, Silage
20.0
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
0.00
81.68
(k00
1,004-69
12058
1
U2
Wynott
1.70
1.70
Small Grain, Silage
6-4 Tans
9l1-3/31
71
0
0
Broad.
28
0.00
10.64
0.00
18.09
1
U2
Wynott
1.70
1.70
Com, Silage
11.0
2/15-6/30
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
44.96
D.00
76.44
r2200
2
U2
ppling
19.00
19.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.9
911 3/31
121
1 0
0
Broad.
48
0.00
18.14
0.00
344.56
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 3 of 32

Waste 1 itili7Atinn TAhlP
Ve f
Tract
Field
Source
IFS
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYF
Apnlic
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(1bs/A)
Cantu
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
App.c.
Metlnd
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
I Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
i000
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
12058
2
U2
ppling
19.00
19.00
Corn, Silage
23.8
2/15-6130
259
0
0
Broad.
259
0.00
97.04
0.00
1,843.83
12058
3
U2
Wynott
5.90
5.90
Small Grain, Silage
6.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
74
0
0
Broad.
30
0.00
11.09
0.00
65.44
12058
3
U2
Wynott
5.90
5.90
Corn, Silage
11.4
2/15-6/30
124
0
0
Broad.
124
0.00
46.46
0.00
274.12
12573
1
U3
Cecil
20.10
19.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
9/1-3/31
115
0
1 0
Irrig.
0
0.00
. 0.00
0.00
0.00
12573
1
U3
Cecil
20,10
19.70
Corn, Silage
21.9
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Irrig.
1 239
157,36
0.00
3,100.04
0.00
12573
2
U3
Vance
0,90
0.90
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
911-3/31
84
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
OAO
0.00
0.00
12573
2
U3
Vance
0.90
0.90
Corn, Silage
17.1
2/15-6130
186
0
0
Irrig.
186
122.47
0,00
110.22
0.00
12573
3
U3
Mecklenburg
10.70
10.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig,
0
0.00
0,00
000
0.00
12573
3
U3
Mecklenburg
10.70
10.70
Corn, Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
1 196
129.05
0,00
1,380.84
0.00
2938
1
U3
Helena
L50
1.20
Small Grain, Silage
8.1 Tons
911-3/31
87
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
2938
1
U3
Helena
1.50
1.20
Com, Silage
15.2
2/15-6130
163
0
0
Irrig.
163
107.32
0.00
128.79
0.00
2938
2
U3
Helena
2.00
1.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.1 Tons
9/1-3131
87
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2938
2
U3
Helena
2.00
1.70
Corn, Silage
15.2
2/15-6130
163
0
0
Irrig.
163
107.32
0,00
182 45
0.00
2938
3
U3
Helena
6.80
6.20
Small Grain, Silage
8.1 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
OA0
0.00
0.00
2938
3
U3
Helena
6.80
6.20
Corn, Silage
15.2
2/15-6/30
163
0
0
Irrig.
163
107.32
0.00
665.40
0.00
2938
4
U3
Helena
32.60
32.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2938
4
1 U3
Helena
32.60
32.00
Corn, Silage
13.9
2115-6/30
149
0
0
Irrig.
149
98.10
0.00
3,139.34
0.00
2938
5
U3
Wynott
2.40
2.20
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
911-3/31
71
0
0
irrig,
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2938
5
U3
Wynott
2.40
2,20
Corn, Silage
11.0
2115-6/30
120
0
0
Irrig.
120
79.01
0.00
173.82
0.00
3182
1
U2
Helena
11.30
10.50
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7131
124
1
0
Broad.
123
0.00
46.09
0.00
483.91
3182
2
U2
Cecil
16.30
16,00
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
811-7/31
160
0
0
Broad,
160
0.00
59.95
0.00
959.20
3182
3
U2
Vance
12.50
10,00
Fescue Pasture
14.1 Tons
811-7/31
1 137
0
1 0
Broad.
137
0.00
51.331
0.00
5i3.32
Preview Database Version 3. t Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 4 of 32

1
Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
1D
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use_
Acres
Crop
RYE
Apples
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rcq'd
OWA)
Ccrnm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
Qbs/A)
Rem,
(IbslA)
Appliic.
Metlnd
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Appled
(IWA)
Liquid
ManureA
pp8ed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal1A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
3182
4
U2
Cecil
13.00
10.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7131
153
0
0
Broad.
153
0.00
57.33
0.00
57327
3182
5
U2
Appling
10.10
5.00
Fescue Pasture
S.I Tans
8/1-7131
170
0
0
Broad.
170
0.00
63.70
0.00
319.48
3182
6
U2
Cecil
17.30
17.30
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7131
153
0
0
Broad.
153
0.00
57.33
0.00
991.76
3112
7
U2
Appling
4.40
4.20
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
811-7131
170
0
0
Broad_
170
0.00
63.70
0.00
26T53
3I82
8
U2
Appling
1320
13.20
Fescue Pasture
5.2 Tons
8/1-7131
173
0
0
Broad.
173
0.00
64.82
0.00
855.64
3505
1
U2
Georgeville
8.60
8.60
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
8/1-7131
156
156
0
Broad.
156
0.00
58,45
0.00
502.68
3505
1 2
U2
Georgeville
L50
1.50
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
8/1-7131
156
156
0
Broad.
156
0.00
58A5
0.00
8T68
3505
3
U2
Georgeville
9.60
9.60
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
156
1 156
0
Broad.
156
0.00
58.45
0.00
561.13
3515
1
U2
Georgeville
10.70
10.70
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
150
150
0
Broad.
150
0.00
56.20
0.00
601.37
3580
1
U2
Wynott
5.80
5.80
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
8/1-7131
169
169
0
Broad.
169
0.00
63.32
0.00
36T27
3580
2
U2
Wynott
1.30
1.30
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
164
164
0
Broad.
164
0.00
61.45
0.00
79.88
3580
3
U2
Worsham
4A01
4.10
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7131
148
148
0
Broad.
148
0.00
55.45
0.001
227.36
3580
4
U2
Wynott
4,80
4.90
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
169
169
0
Broad.
169
0.00
63.32
0.00
303.95
3580
.5
U2
Worsham
7 40
7.40
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7131
148
148
1 0
Broad.
148
0.00
55.45
0.00
410.36
3583
1
U3
Cecil
12,60
12.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
9/1-3131
115
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
O.001
0.00
0.00
3583
1
U3
Cecil
12.60
12.60
Corn, Silage
21.9
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Irrig.
239
157.36
0.00
1,982.761
0.00
3583
2
U3
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
9/1-3131
115
0
0
Irrig_
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3583
2
U3
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Corn, Silage
21.9
2/15-6/30
239
0
1 0
brig.
239
157.36
0.00
676.66
0.00
3583
3
U2
Pacolet
5.60
5.10
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7131
130
0
0
Broad.
1 130
0.00
48.711
0.00
248.42
3602
3
U3
Appling
2.40
2A0
Small Grain, Silage
11.3
9/1-3131
125
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3602
3
U3
Appling
2.40
2.40
Com, Silage
24.5
2115-6/30
267
0
0
Irrig.
267
175.80
0.00
421.92
0.00
3602
4 1
U3
Appling
0.50
0.50
Small Grain, Silage
11.3
911-3131
t 125
1 0
1 0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 5 of 32

Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
11)
Cp;3 Cer;ea
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APpbc.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Read
(lbs/A)
Cantu
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Appbc.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManurrA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
IOOD
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
3602
4
U3
Appling
0.50
0.50
Corn, Silage
24.5
2/15-613D
267
0
0
Irrig.
267
175.80
0,00
87.90
0.00
3602
5
U3
Appling
L70
1.70
Small Grain, Silage
11.3
911-3/31
125
0
0
Irrig,
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3602
5
U3
Appling
1.70
1.70
Corn, Silage
24.5
2/15-6130
267
0
0
Irrig.
267
175.80
0.00
298.86
0.00
3602
6
U3
Vance
1.00
1.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
1 0
Irrig.
1 0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3602
6
U3
Vance
1.00
1.00
Corn, Silage
17.6
2/15-6/30
192
0
0
Irrig.
192
126.42
0.00
126.42
0.00
3602
1 7
U3
Vance
4.10
4.10
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3131
87
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.001
0.00
0.00
0.00
3602
7
U3
Vance
4.10
4.10
Corn, Silage
17.6
2115-6/30
192
0
0
Irrig.
192
126.42
0.00
518.31
0.00
3607
1
U2
Cecil
13.10
13.10
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
49.83
UO
652.82
3607
2
U2
Cecil
7.10
5.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
133
0
0
Broad,
133
0.00
49.83
0.00
249.17
3607
3
U2
Vance
290
2.90
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
D
0
Broad.
137
0,00
51.33
0.00
148.86
3607
4
U2
Vance
2.80
2.80
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
0
0
Broad.
191
0.00
71.57
O.DO
200.38
3607
5
U2
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
204
D
0
Broad.
204
0,00
76.44
0.00
290.46
3607
6
U2
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
191
D
0
Broad.
191
0.00
71.57
0.00
25T63
3622
1
U3
Georgeville
6.40
6.40
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irrig,
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3622
1
U3
Georgeville
6.40
6.40
Corry, Silage
21.2
2115-6/30
1 227
D 1
0
Irrig.
227
149.46
0.001
956.55
0.00
3622
2
U3
Georgeville
3.70
3.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0-00
3622
2
U3
Georgeville
3.70
3.70
Com, Silage
21.2
2115-6/30
227
0
0
]Trig.
227
149.46
0.00
553.01
0.00
3622
3
U3
Georgeville
6.601
6.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3622
3
U3
Georgeville
6.60
6.60
Com, Silage
21.2
2115-6/30
227
O
1 0
Irrig.
227
149.46
0.00
986.44
0.00
3622
4
U3
Georgeville
7.00
7.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
911-3/31
109
0
0
brig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3622
4
U3
Georgeville
7.00
7.00
Com, Silage
21.2
2/15-6/30
227
0
0
Irrig.
227
149.46
0.00
1,046.23
0.00
3624
I
U3
Georgeville
8.90
8.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
brig.
0
O.QO
0.00
0.40
0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 6 of 32

1
I
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic_
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutnent
Req'd
(1bs/A)
Comm
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
(1bs1A)
Res.
(lbsIA)
Applic
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsIA)
Liquid
Manure -A
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal1A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
3624
1
U3
Georgeville
8.90
8.50
Corn, Silage
21.9
2/15-6130
234
0
0
Irrig.
234
154.07
0-00
1,309.60
0.00
3624
2
U3
Georgeville
16.80
16.40
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
911-3131
112
0
0
Irrig.
D
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3624
2
U3
Georgeville
16.80
16.40
Corn, Silage
21.9
2115-6/30
234
0
0
Irrig.
234
154.07
0.00
2,526.75
0.00
3637
-1
U2
Vance
13.60
13.60
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
811-7l31
143
1 143
0
Broad.
1 143
0.00
53.58
0.00
728.69
3637
2
U2
Vance
31.40
31.40
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
811-7/31
137
137
0
Broad.
137
0.00
51.33
0.00
1,61 1.83
3637
3
U2
Vance
11.70
11.70
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
811-7/31
137
137
0
Broad.
137
0.00
51.33
0.00
600.59
3637
4
U2
Vance
1.60
1.60
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
811-7/31
1 130
130
0
Broad.
130
0.00
48,711
0.00
77.93
3637
5
U2
Vance
14.10
14.10
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
811-7131
130
130
0
Broad.
130
0.00
48.71
0.00
686.80
4365
l
U2
Wynott
10.50
10-50
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
127
127
0
Broad,
127
0.00
47.59
0.00
499.65
4367
1
U2
Helena
12.80
12.80
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
911-3/31
84
0
0
Broad.
34
0.00
12.59
0.00
161.14
4367
1
U2
Helena
12.80
12.90
Com, Silage
14.7
2115-6/30
1 157
0
0
Broad.
157
0.00
58.83
0.00
752.97
4367
2
U2
Helena
1-80
1.80
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3l31
84
0
D
Broad.
34
0.00
12.59
0.00
22.66
4367
2
U2
Helena
1-80
1.80
Cam, Silage
14.7
2/15-6130
157
0
D
1 Broad.
157
0.00
5&.83
0.00
105.89
4367
3
U2
Wynott
11.60
11-60
Small Grain, Silage
6.7 Tons
9/1-3131
74
0
0
Broad.
30
0-00
11.09
0.00
128.65
4367
3
U2
Wynott
11-60
11.60
Com, Silage
I L4
2115-6/30
124
0
0
Broad.
124
0.00
46.46
0.00
538.95
4367
4
U2
Helena
0.60
0,60
Small Grain, Silage
8.1 Tons
911-3131
87
0
D
Broad.
35
0.00
13.04
0.00
T82
4367
4
U2
Helena
0.60
0.60
Cam, Silage
15.2
2115-6130
163
0
0
Broad.
163
0.00
61-07
0.00
36.64
4371
3
U2
Wynott
4.30
4.30
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
127
127
0
Broad.
127
0.00
47.59
0.00
204.62
4371
4
U2
Wynott
5.10
5.10
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
811-7/31
117
117
0
Broad.
1t7
0.00
43.84
0.00
223.58
4376
1
U2
Wynott
10.40
10.40
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
127
127
0
Broad.
127
0.00
47.59
0.00
494.89
4376a
1
U2
Wynott
4.50
4.50
Fescue Pasture
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
123
123
0
1 Broad.
123
0.00
46.09
0.00
207.39
4376a
2
1 U2
Wynott
13.60
13.60
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
1 127
127
0
1 Broad,
127
0.00
4T59
0.00
647.16
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 7 of 32

a
L-
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crap
RYE
Appl€c.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs1A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbsIA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
Man=A
pp8ed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid.
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4380
1
U2
Wynott
2.20
2.20
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
911-3131
71
0
0
Broad.
28
0.00
10.64
0.00
23.41
4380
1
U2
Wynott
2.20
2.20
Corn, Silage
11.0
2/15-6/30
120
0
0
Broad_
120
0.00
44.96
0.00
99.92
4380
2
U2
Wynott
13,40
13.40
Small Grain, Silage
6.1 Tons
911-3131
68
0
0
Broad.
27
0.00
10.19
0.00
136.56
4380
2
U2
lWynott
13.40
13.40
Corn, Silage
I0.4
2/15-6130
113
1 0
0
Broad.
113
0.00
42.34
0.00
567.35
4380
3
U2
Wynott
3.20
3.20
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
911-3/31
71
0
0
Broad.
28
0.00
10.64
U00
34.05
4380
3
U2
Wynott
3.20
3.20
Corr, Silage
11.0
2/15-6130
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
44.96
0.00
143.88
4380
1 4
U2
Wynott
9.70
9.70
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
911-3/31
71
0
0
Broad_
28
0.00
10.64
0.001
103.22
4380
4
U2
Wynott
9.70
9.70
Corn, Silage
11.0
2/15-6130
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
44.96
0.00
436.14
4404
1
U2
Vance
9.60
9.60
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
143
0
Broad.
143
HO
53.58
0.00
514.37
4404
2
U2
Vance
8.80
8.80
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7131
130
130
0
Broad_
130
0.00
48.71
0.00
428.64
4404
3
U2
Vance
8.20
8.20
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
137
0
Broad.
137
0.00151.33
0.00
420.92
4404
4
U2
Vance
4.80
4.80
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
143
0
Broad.
143
0.00
53.58
0.00
257.19
4404
5
U2
Vance
25.60
25.60
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
9/1-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
51.33
0.00
1,314,10
4419
1
U2
Wynott
2.20
2.20
Small Grain, Silage
6.7 Tons
9/1-3131
74
0
0
Broad-
30
0.00
11.09
0.00
2440
4419
1
U2
Wynott
2.20
220
Corn, Silage
I IA
2/15-6/30
124
0
0
Broad.
124
0.00
46.46
0.00
10221
4419
2
U2
Wilkes
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage
5.6 Tons
911-3131
70
0
0
Broad 1
28
0.00
10.49
0.00
16.78
4419
2
U2
Wilkes
1.60
1.60
Corn, Silage
9.6 Tons
2/15-6130
115
0
0
Broad.
115
0.00
43.09
0.00
68,94
4419
3
U2
Wilkes
3.30
3.30
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
911-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
32
0.00
11.99
0.00
39.57
4419
3
U2
Wilkes
3.30
3.30
Corn, Silage
11.0
2/15-6/30
132
0
0
Broad_
132
0.00
49.46
0.00
163.21
4419
4
U2
Wynott
22.90
22.90
Small Grain, Silage
6A Tons
911-3131
71
0
0
Broad. 1
28
0.00
10.64
0.00
243.68
4419
4
U2
Wynott
22.90
22.90
Corn, Silage
11.0
2115-6/30
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
44.96
0.00
1,029.64
4419
5
U2
Wynott
2.90
2.30
Small Grain, Silage
6.9 Tons
9/1-3/31
77
0
0
Broad.
31
0.00
11.541
0.00
26.54
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 8 of 32

4
Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
11a
Soil series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Apphe.
Period
itrcgen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Obs/A)
Con m
Fert_
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Res_
(tbs1A)
Applie.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gailA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4419
5
U2
Wynott
2.90
2.30
Corn, Silage
11.8
2115-6130
129
0
0
Broad.
129
0.00
48.33
0.00
111.17
4419
6
U2
Wynott
2.90
2.90
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
71
0
0
Broad.
28
0.00
10.64
0.00
30.86
4419
6
U2
Wynott
2.90
2.90
Cote, Silage
11.0
2115-6130
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
44.96
0.00
130.39
4427
1
U2
Appling
5.60
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
911-3131
102
0
0
Broad.
41
0.00
15.29
0.00
76.44
4427
1
U2
Appling
5.60
5.00
Corn, Silage
20.0
2/15-6130
2l8
0
0
Broad.
218
0.00
8L68
0.00
408.41
4427
2
U2
Appling
55.80
55.80
Small Gragt, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
41
0.00
15.29
0.00
853.03
4427
1 2
U2
Appling
55.80
55.80
Com, Silage
20.0
2/15-6130
218
1 0
1 0
Broad.
218
0.00
81.68
0.00
4,557.84
4427
3
U2
Cecil
1.70
1.10
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
39
0.00
14.69
0.00
16.16
4427
3
U2
Cecil
1.70
1.10
Corn, Silage
18.4
2115-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
0.00
75.31
0.00
82.84
4457
1
U2
Helena
35.00
35.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Broad.
34
0.00
12.59
0.00
44063
4457
1
U2
Helena
35.00
35.00
Corn, Silage
14.7
2115-6130
157
0
1 0
Broad.
157
0.00
58.83
0.00
2,059.91
4457
2
U2
Cecil
10.90
10.90
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
39
0.00
14.69
0.00
160.10
4457
2
U2
Cecil
10.90
H190
Corn, Silage
18.4
1 2115-6130
201
0
0
Broad.
201
0.00
75.31
0.00
820-90
4457
3
U2
Wynott
17.00
17.00
Small Grain, Silage
16.1 Tons
9/1-3/31
68
0
0
Broad.
27
0.00
10.19
0.00
173.26
4457
3
U2
Wynott
17.00
17.00
Corn, Silage
10.4
2/15-6130
113
1 0
0
Broad.
113
0.00
42.34
0.00
719.77
4457
4
U2
Chewacla-P
7.60
7.60
Small Grain, Silage
NIA
911-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
Ol
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4457
4
U2
Chewacla-P
7.60
7.60
Corn, Silage
26.6
2115-6130
277
0
0
Broad.
277
0.00
103.79
0.00
788-79
4457
5
U2
Chewacla-P
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage
N/A
911-3/31
1 0
0
1 0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4457
5
U2
Chewacla-P
3.60
3.60
Cam, Silage
28.0
2115-6130
291
0
0
Broad.
291
0.00
109.03
0.00
392.52
4461
1
U2
Helena
11.30
11.30
Fescue Pasture
3.7 Tans
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
44.96
0.00
508.08
4461
2
U2
Cecil
16.30
16.30
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
53.58
0.00
873.36
4461
3
U2
Vance
12.50
12.50
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
[:JtO
51.33
0.00
641.65
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 9 of 32

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
117
Cnil Oeriec
Total
Aram
Use.
Acre',
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
abs/A)
Res.
(Ibs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
manumA
pp8ed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gaUA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4461
4
U2
Cecil
13.00
13.00
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
811-7/31
117
0
0
Broad.
117
0.00
43.84
0.00
569.90
4461
5
U2
Appling
10.10
10.10
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
811-7/31
170
0
0
Broad_
170
0.00
63.70
0.00
643.34
4461
6
U2
Cecil
17.30
17.30
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
143
0
0
Broad_
143
0.00
53.58
0.00
926.94
4461
7
U2
Appling
4.40
4.40
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
160
0.00
59.95
0.00
263.78
4461
8
U2
Appling
13.20
13.20
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
8/1-7131
170
0
0
Broad.
170
0.00
63.70
0.00
840.80
4462
1
U2
Wynott
5.80
5.80
Small Grain, Silage
6.1 Tons
9/1-3/31
68
0
0
Broad.
27
0.00
10.19
0.00
59.11
4462
1
U2
Wynott
5.80
5.80
Com, Silage
IOA
2115-6130
113
0
0
Broad.
113
0.00
42.34
0.00
245.57
4462
2
U2
Wynott
9-80
9.80
Small Grain, Silage
5.6 Tons
911-3131
62
1 D
0
Broad.
1 25
0.00
9.29
0.00
91.06
4462
2
U2
Wynott
9.80
9.80
Com, Silage
9.6 Tons
2/15-6130
105
0
0
Broad.
105
0.00
39.34
0.00
385.55
4462
3
U2
Wynott
3.50
3.00
Small Grain, Silage
5.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
62
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
9.29
0.00
27.88
4462
3
U2
Wynott
3.50
3.00
Com, Silage
9.6 Tons
2115-6/30
105
0
0
Broad.
105
0.00
39.34
0.00
118.03
4462
4
U2
Cecil
12.50
12.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
1 Broad.
43
0.00
16.041
HO
200.46
4462
4
U2
Cecil
12.50
12.50
Com, Silage
20.0
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
0.00
81.68
0.00
1,021.02
4463
1
U2
Cecil
7.10
7.10
Small Grain, Silage
9-6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
43
HO
16.04
0.00
113.86
4463
1
U2
Cecil
7.10
7.10
Corn, Silage
20.0
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
HO
81.68
0.00
579.94
4463
2
U2
Cecil
2.10
2.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
45
0.00
16.78
0.00
35.25
4463
2
U2
Cecil
2.10
2. 10
Com, Silage
21.2
2115-6130
231
0
0
Broad.
231
0.00
86.55
0.00
181.76
4463
3
U2
Cecil
15.90
15.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
43
0.00
16.04
0.00
254.98
4463
3
U2
Cecil
15.90
15.90
Cam, Silage
20.0
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
1 Broad.
218
0.00
81.68
0.00
1,298.74
4466
1
U3
Cecil
52.20
52.20
Small Grain, Silage
IOA
9/1-3/31
112
0 1
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
OAO
OAO
D.00
66
1
U3
Cecil
52.20
52.20
Corn, Silage
21.2
2115-6/30
231
0
0
Irrig.
231
152.10
0.00
7,939.35
0.00
r4'469
1
U2
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
39
0.00
14.69
0.00
118.97
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 10 of 32

1
1
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
[D
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Penod
Nitrcgen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(ibs1A)
Comm
Fert-
Nutrient
Applied
Qbs/A)
Res-
(lbs/A)
Appfic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid -
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4469
1
U2
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Corn, Silage
18A
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
0.00
75.31
0.00
610.03
4469
2
U2
Cecil
16.40
15.20
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
39
0.00
14.69
0.00
223.25
4469
2
U2
Cecil
16.40
1520
Corn, Silage
18.4
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
0.00
75.31
0.00
1,144.74
3
U2
Cecil
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
45
0.00
16.78
0.00
33.57
F4469
4469
3
U2
Cecil
2.00
2.00
Corn, Silage
21.2
2115-6/30
231
0
0
Broad.
231
0.00
86.55
0.00
173.11
4471
1 - 12A
U3
Mecklenburg
7.61
7.61
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4471
1 - 12A
U3
Mecklenburg
7.61
7.61
Corn, Silage
16.5
2115-6130
180
0
0
Irrig.
180
118.52
0.00
901.90
0-00
4471
1 - 12B
U3
Mecklenburg
5.85
5.85
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
brig.
1 0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4471
1 - 12B
U3
Mecklenburg
5.85
5.85
Corn, Silage
16.5
2/15-6/30
180
0
0
[Trig.
180
118.52
0.00
693.32
0.00
4471
1 - 13A
U3
Mecklenburg
2.62
2.62
Small Grain, Silage
83 Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
0
Irrig.
92
60.58
0.00
158,711
0.00
4471
1 - 13A
U3
Mecklenburg
2.62
2.62
Cora Silage
17.5
2115-6/30
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
125.761
0.00
329.49
0.00
4471
1 - 13B
U3
Mecklenburg
5.96
5.96
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
0
Irrig.
92
60.58
0.00
361.02
0.00
4471
l - 13B
U3
Mecklenburg
5.96
5.96
Corn, Silage
17.5
2115-6130
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
125.76
0.00
74952
0.00
4471
1 - 14A
U3
Mecklenburg
3.68
3.68
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
[frig.
95
62.55
0.00
230.18
0.00
4471
1 - 14A
U3
Mecklenburg
3.68
3.68
Corn, Silage
18.0
2115-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
474.91
0.00
4471
1 - 14B
U3
Mecklenburg
5.64
5.64
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tans
9/1-3/31
95
0
0 J
[rrig.
95
62.55
0.00
352.78
0.00
4471
l - 14B
U3
Mecklenburg
5.64
5.64
Corn, Silage
18.0
21]5-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig,
196
129'05
0.00
727.84
0.00
4471
1- 15
U3
Mecklenburg
5.42
5.42
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
339.02
0.00
4471
1 - 15
U3
Mecklenburg
5.42
5.42
Corn, Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
brig.
196
129.05
0.00
699.45
0-00
4471
1 - 16
U3
Mecklenburg
7.27
727
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
454.74
0.00
4471
1 - 16
U3
Mecklenburg
7.27
7.27
Corn, Silage
1 18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
938.20
0.00
4471
1- dry
1 U2
Mecklenburg
24.65
24.65
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
911-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
80
0.00
29.97
0.00
738.88
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page I 1 of 32

Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
Ir1
Soil Series
Total
Acree
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rcq'd
Obs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pp►ied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Reid)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4471
1- dry
U2
Mecklenburg
24.65
24.65
Corn, Silage
15.2
2/15-6130
166
O
0
Broad.
166
0.00
62.20
0.00
1,533.18
4471
2- l0A
U3
Mecklenburg
6.46
646
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
O
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
404.07
0.00
4471
2- l0A
U3
Mecklenburg
6.46
6 46
Corn, Silage
18.0
2/15-6130
196
O
0
brig.
196
129.05
0.00
833.66
0.00
4471
2 - IOB
U3
Mecklenburg
5.96
5.96
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
0
Irrig.
92
60.58
0.00
361.02
0.00
4471
2 - IOB
U3
Mecklenburg
5.96
5.96
Co., Silage
17.5
2115-6/30
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
125.76
0.00
749.52
0.00
4471
2- 11
U3
Mecklenburg
6.49
6.49
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Irrig.
1 87
57.28
O.GOI
371.76
0.00
4471
2- 11
U3
Mecklenburg
6.49
6.49
Corn, Silage
16.5
2115-6130
180
0
0
Irrig.
180
118.52
0.00
769.17
0.00
4471
2 - 9A
U3
Wynott
7.61
T61
Small Grain, Silage
6.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
74
0
0
Irrig_
74
48.72
0.00
370.78
0.00
4471
2 - 9A
U3
Wynott
7.61
T61
Com, Silage
11.4
2115-6130
124
0
0
Irrig.
124
81.64
0.00
621.31
0.00
4471
2 - 913
U3
Wynott
6.33
6.33
Small Grain, Silage
6.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
74
0
0
1 Irrig.
74
48.72
0.00
308.42
0.00
4471
2 - 9B
U3
Wynott
6.33
6-33
Com, Silage
11.4
2/15-6130
124
0
0
Irrig.
124
81.64
0.00
516.81
0.00
4471
2 - dry
U2
Mecklenburg
12.25
12.25
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
87
0.00
32.60
0.00
399.32
4471
2 - dry
U2
Mecklenburg
12.25
12.25
Com, Silage
16.5
2115-6/30
180
0
0
Broad.
1 180
0.00
67.44
0-00
826.18
4471
4- IA
U3
Mecklenburg
6.66
6.66
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62,55
0,00
416,58
0.00
4471
4- 1A
U3
Mecklenburg
6.66
6.66
Corn Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
859A7
0.00
4471
4- IB
U3
Mecklenburg
7.61
7.61
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
brig.
95
62.55
0,00
476.00
0.00
4471
4- lB
U3
Mecklenburg
7-611
T61
Corn, Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
1 196
129.05
0.00
982.07
0.00
4471
4 - 2A
U3
Mecklenburg
6.73
6.73
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
brig.
95
62.551
0.00
420.96
0.00
4471
4 - 2A
U3
Mecklenburg
6.73
6.73
Cam, Silage
18.0
2/15-6130
1 196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
868.51
0.00
4471
4 - 2B
U3
Mecklenburg
7.25
7.25
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
brig.
95
62.55
0.00
453.49
0.00
4471
4 - 2B
U3
Mecklenburg
7.25
7.25
Corn, Silage
18.0
2115-6/30
196
0
0
[Trig.
196
129.05
0.00
935.61
0.00
4471
4 - 3A
U3
Mecklenburg
6.80
6.80
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
425.34
0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 12 of 32

4
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
ObsIA)
Ccmm
Ferl.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsIA)
Res.
(lbslA)
Applic.
Method
Mann;
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Mann:
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gallA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4471
4 - 3A
U3
Mecklenburg
6.80
6.80
Corn, Silage
18.0
2145-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
877.54
0.00
4471
4 - 3B
U3
Mecklenburg
7.12
7.12
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
445.36
0-00
4471
4 - 3B
U3
Mecklenburg
7.12
7.12
Com, Silage
18.0
2115-6130
196
0
0
brig.
196
129.05
0.00
918.84
0.00
4471
4 - 4A
U3
Mecklenburg
5.74
5.74
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
359.04
0.00
4471
4 - 4A
U3
Mecklenburg
5.74
5.74
Corn, Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
1 Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
740.75
0.00
4471
4 - 4B
U3
Mecklenburg
4.90
4.90
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig_
95
62.55
0.00
306.49
0.00
4471
4 - 4B
U3
Mecklenburg
4.90
4.90
Corn, Silage
180
2/15-6/30
1 196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
632.35
0.00
4471
4 - 5A
U3
Mecklenburg
5.38
5.38
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
336.52
0.00
4471
4 - 5A
U3
Mecklenburg
5,38
5.38
Corn, Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
1 Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
694.29
0.00
4471
4 - 5B
U3
Mecklenburg
1.86
1.86
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
1 Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
116.34
0.00
4471
4 - 5B
U3
Mecklenburg
1.86
1.86
Corn, Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
1 196
0
0
Irrig,
196
129.05
0.00
240.03
0.00
4471
4-6
U3
Wynott
5.29
5.29
Small Grain, Silage
6.1 Tons
911-3/31
68
0
1 0
brig.
68
44.77
0.00
236.85
0.00
4471
4-6
U3
Wynott
5.29
5.29
Corn, Silage
10.4
2115-6/30
113
0
0
Irrig,
113
74.40
0.00
393.58
0.00
4471
4-7
U3
Wynott
4.43
4.43
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
911-3131
71
0
0
Irrig.
71
46.75
0.00
207.09
0.00
4471
4-7
U3
Wynott
4.43
4.43
Corn, Silage
11.0
2/15-6130
120
0
0
Irrig.
120
79.01
0.00
350.02
0.00
4471
4-8
U3
Mecklenburg
7.43
7.43
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
911-3/31
87
0
1 0
Irrig.
87
57.28
0.00
425.61
0.00
4471
4-8
U3
Mecklenburg
7.43
7.43
Corn, Silage
16.5
2/15-6/30
'180
0
0
Irrig.
180
118.52
0.00
880.57
0.00
4471
4 - dry
U2
Mecklenburg
14.00
14.00
Small Grain, Silage
T2 Tons
911-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
80
0.00
29.97
0.00
419.65
4471
4 - dry
U2
Mecklenburg
14.00
14.00
Corn, Silage
15.2
2/15-6/30
166
0
0
Broad.
166
0.00
62.20
0.00
870-77
4471
5
U2
Mecklenburg
13.80
13.80
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
911-3/31
92
0
1 0
Broad.
92
0.00
34.47
0.00
475.70
4471
5
U2
Mecklenburg
13.80
13,80
Corn, Silage
17.5
2/15-6/30
191
0
0
Broad.
191
0.00
71.57
0.00
987.60
4471
6 - 17
U3
Mecklenburg
5.92
5.92
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
370.30
0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 13 of 32

4
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
I Soil .$Pries
Total
Ames
Use.
Aces
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
¢bs/A)
Ccnm
Fert.
Nutricat
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res-
(1bs1A)
Applic.
Metbod
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
I000
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4471
6- 17
U3
Mecklenburg
5.92
5.92
Corn, Silage
1&0
2/15-6130
196
0
0
]trig.
196
129.05
0.00
763.98
0.00
4471
6- i 8A
U3
Mecklenburg
4.52
4.52
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0,00
282,73
0.00
4471
6 - 18A
U3
Mecklenburg
4.52
4.52
Corn, Silage
1&0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0,00
583.31
0.00
4471
6 - 18B
U3
Mecklenburg
3.55
3.55
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3131
87
0
1 0
Irrig.
87
57.28
0.00
203.35
0.00
4471
6 - 18B
U3
Mecklenburg
3.55
3.55
Corn, Silage
16.5
2/15-6/30
180
0
0
Irrig.
180
118.52
0.00
420.73
0.00
4471
6 - dry
U2
Mecklenburg
13.70
13.20
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
87
0.00
32.60
0.001
430,29
4471
6 - dry
U2
Mecklenburg
13.70
13.20
Corn, Silage
16.5
2/15-6/30
180
0
0
Broad.
180
0.00
67.44
0.00
890 26
4497
l
U2
Appling
12.70
12.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.6
9/1-3131
119
0
0
Broad.
118
0.00
44.21
0.00
561.51
4497
1
U2
Appling
12.70
12.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
42 bu.
4/1-9115
163
0
1 0
Broad.
163
0.00
61.07
0.00
775.64
4536
1
U2
Vance
6.50
6.50
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
191
1 0
Broad.
191
0.00
71.57
0.00
465A7
4536
2
U2
Varina
3.50
3.50
Fescue Hay
3.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
133
133
0
Broad.
133
0.00
49.83
U00
174.42
4536
3
U2
Wynott
2,00
2,00
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
9/1-7131
155
155
0
Broad.
155
0.00
58.08
0.00
116AS
4536
4
U2
Wynott
3.30
3.30
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
155
155
0
Broad.
155
0.00
58.08
0.00
191.65
4536
5
U2
Vance
3.30
3.30
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
811-7/31
173
1 173
0
Broad_
173
0.00
64.82
0.00
213.91
4536
6
U2
Wynott
1.80
1.80
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
155
155
0
Broad.
155
0.00
58.08
0.00
104.54
4539
1
U2
Vance
11.50
11.50
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
173
0
0
Broad,
173
0.00
64.82
0.00
745.44
4539
2
U2
Vance
23.90
21.50
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
811-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.1
160
0.00
59.95
0.00
1,2W92
4539
3
U2
Chewacla-P
3.50
3.50
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
1 0 1
0
Broad.
152
0.00
56.95
0.00
199.33
4539
4
U2
Cecil
5.80
5.80
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
204
0
0
Broad.
204
0.00
75 44
0.00
443.33
4543
l
U3
Cecil
7.00
7.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4543
l
U3
Cecil
7.00
7.00
Corn, Silage
21.9
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Irrig.
1 239
157.36
0.00
1,101.54
0.00
4592
1
U2
Georgeville
8.20
7.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
1 9/1-3131
109
1 0
1 0
Broad.
44
0.00
16.34
0.00
114.36
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 14 of 32

4
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
IV
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
AppBc.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(ibs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(IWA)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
WOW
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
anurcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4592
1
U2
Georgeville
8.20
7.00
Corn, Silage
21.2
2115-6/30
227
0
0
Broad.
227
0.00
85.05
0.00
595.38
4592
2
U2
Georgeville
11.30
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
42
0.00
15.59
0.00
155.87
4592
2
U2
Georgeville
11.30
10.00
Corn, Silage
20.0
2115-6/30
214
0
0
Broad.
214
0.00
80.18
0.00
801.83
4894
1
U2
Appling
23.80
23.80
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
8/1-7131
170
0
0
Broad.
170
0.00
63.70
0.00
1,515.98
4894
2
U2
Helena
20.00
20.00
Fescue Pasture
3.7 Tons
8/1-7131
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
44.96
0.00
899.25
4894
3
U2
Cecil
8.30
8.30
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
49.83
0.00
413.62
4894
1 4
U2
lAppling
20.80
20.80
Fescue Pasture
3-6 Tons
8/1-7131
1 120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
44.961
0.00
935.23
4894
5
U2
Vance
9.30
9.30
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
117
0
0
Broad,
117
OAO
43.84
0.00
407.70
4894
6
U2
Rion
48.60
45.00
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
44.96
0.00
2,023.31
5805
1
U2
Wynott
30.20
30.20
Fescue Pasture
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
123
0
0
Broad.
123
0-00
46.09
0.00
1,391.81
5805
2
U2
Wynott
5.10
5.10
Fescue Pasture-
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/3 k
1 123
0
0
Broad.
123
0.00
46.09
0.00
235.04
5805
3
U2
Wynott
21.60
21.60
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
117
0
0
Broad.
117
OAO
43.84
0.00
946.91
5805
4
U2
Wynott
41.00
41.00
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
811-7131
117
0
0
Broad.
117
0.00
43.84
0.00
1,797.37
5820
1
U2
Wynott
30.20
30.20
Fescue Pasture
3.2 Tons
8/1-7131
107
0
0
Broad.
107
0.00
40.09
0.00
1,210.76
5820
2
U2
Wynott
5.10
5.10
Fescue Pasture
3.2 Tours
8/1-7131
107
0
0
Broad.
107
0.00
40.09
0.00
204.47
5820
3
U2
Wynott
21.60
21.60
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7131
117
1 0
0
Broad,
117
0.00
43.84
0.00
946.91
5820
4
U2
Wynott
41.00
41.00
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7131
117
0
0
Broad.
117
0.00
43.84
0.00
1,797.37
6147
1
U2
Appling
8.90
8.90
Fescue Hay
5.2 Tons
8/1-7131
231
231
0
Broad.
231
0.00
86.55
0.00
770.32
9062
1
U3
Vance
5.30
5.30
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/I-3131
1 84
0
1 0
Inig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9062
1
U3
Vance
5.30
5.30
Corn, Silage
17.1
2/15-6130
186
0
0
Irrig.
186
122.47
0.00
649.07
0.00
9062
1 2
U3
Vance
5.70
5.70
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9062
2
LW
Vance
5.70
5.70
Corn, Silage
171
2/15-6/30
186
0 .
0
Irrig.
186
122.47
0.00
698.06
0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: t 1/25/2015 WUT Page 15 of 32

r-
L J
48
Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
source
M
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Apphc.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
ObslA)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsIA)
Res.
(IbsIA)
Apphc.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(IWA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
loco
gaIIA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
9062
3
U3
Vance
6.60
6.60
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
911-3/31
84
0
0
brig.
0
0-00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9062
3
U3
Vance
6.60
6.60
Corn, Silage
17.1
2/15-6/30
186
0
0
Irrig.
186
122.47
0.00
808.28
0.00
9062
4
U3
Vance
3.00
3.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
911-3/31
84
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9062
4
U3
Vance
3.00
3.00
Corn, Silage
17.1
2/15-6130
186
0
Irrig.
186
122.47
0.00
367.40
0.00
9062
5
U3
Vance
4.60
4.60
Small Grain, Silage
7.4 Tons
911-3/31
820
JO
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9062
5
U3
Vance
4.60
4.60
Corn, Silage
16.6
2/15-6130
1810
brig.
181
119.17
0.00
548.20
0.00
9062
1 6
U3
Vance
7.20
7.20
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
911-3/31
84
0
0
Irrig.
0
0.00
0.00
0.001
0.00
9062
6
U3
Vance
7.20
7.20
Corn, Silage
17.1
2I15-6130
186
0
0
Irrig,
1 186
122.47
0.00
881.76
0.00
9062
7
U3
Vance
8.40
8.40
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
911-3l31
84
0
0
brig.
0
0.00
0-00
0.00
0.00
9062
7
U3
Vance
8.40
8.40
Corn, Silage
17.1
2l15-6/30
186
0
0
Irrig,
186
122.47
0.00
1,028.71
0.00
9347
1
U2
Wynott
3.60
3.60
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
811-7131
164
1 0
0
Broad.
164
0.00
61.45
0.00
221.22
9532
I
U3
Badin
23.60
23.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3/31
103
0
0
Irrig.
0
0-00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9532
1
U3
Badin
23.60
23.00
Co., Silage
20.9
2/15-6130
224
0
0
Irrig.
1 224
147.49
0.00
3,392,18
0.00
9810
1
U2
Pacolet
14.90
13.00
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
811-7/31
160
0
0
Broad,
160
0.00
59.95
0,00
779,35
999
1
U2
Nanford
1.20
1.20
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
49.83
0.00
59,80
999
2
U2
Nanford
3.90
3.90
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
811-7131
133fO
0
Broad.
133
a.aD
49.83
0.00
194.35
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
75,86T09
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
21,966.50
-
Balance, 1000 gallons
-53,900.59
Total Applied, tons
-
101,750.58
Total Produced, tons
-
741000.00
Balance, tons
-
-27,750.5$
Notes: 1. In the tract column, --- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 t/25/2015 WUT Page 16 of 32

i
r
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rod
¢bs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(1bs/A)
Liquid
Manm-eA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Mann:
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
10013
1
U2
Coronaca
9.40
9.40
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
59
0.00
22.03
0.00
207A0
10013
1
U2
Coronaca
9.40
9.40
Grain Sorghum, Silage
15.7
4/1-9/15
119
0
0
Broad_
119
0.00
44.59
0.00
419.12
100i3
2
U2
Coronaca
5.90
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
911-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
59
0.00
22.03
0.00
110.16
10013
2
U2
Coronaca
590
5.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
15.7
4/1-9/15
119
0
0
Broad.
119
0.00
44.59
0.00
222.94
1601541
1
U3
Appling
7.60
T60
Small Grain, Silage
10.9
911-3131
121
0
0
Irrig.
121
79.67
0.00
605A8
0.00
1001541
1
U3
Appling
7.60
7.60
Grain Sorghum, Silage
20.2
4/1-9115
154
0
0
Irrig.
154
101.40
0.00
770.61
0.00
1001541
2
U3
Vance
10.00
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
911-3/31
84
0
1 0
Irrig.
84
55.31
0.00
553.07
0.00
1001541
2
U3
Vance
10.00
10.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.5
4/I-9115
110
0
0
Irrig.
110
72A3
0.00
724.26
0.00
1001542
1
U3
Appling
8.60
8.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.9
911-3/31
121
0
0
Irrig.
121
79.67
0.00
685AS
0-00
1001542
1
U3
Appling
8.60
8.60
Grain Sorghum, Silage
20.2
4/1-9/15
154
0
0
Irrig_
154
101.40
0.00
872,011
0.00
1001542
2
U3
Appling
9.10
9.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.9
9/1-3131
121
0
0
Irrig.
121
79.67
0.00
724.98
0.00
1001542
2
U3
Appling
9.10
9.10
Grain Sorghum, Silage
20.2
4/1-9115
154
0
0
brig.
154
101.40
0.00
922.71
0.00
10557
1
U2
Badin
4.80
4.80
Fescue Pasture
3.2 Tons
811-7131
104
0
0
Broad.
104
0.00
38.97
0.00
187.04
10557
2
U2
Badin
5.70
5.70
Fescue Pasture
3.2 Tons
811-7131
104
0
0
Broad.
104
0.00
38.97
0.00
222.11
11136
1
U3
Vance
20.40
20.00
Small Grain, Silage
7A Tons
911-3131
82
0
0
Irrig.
82
53.99
0.00
1,079.91
0.00
11136
1
U3
Vance
20.40
20.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.1
4/1-9115
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
70AS
0.00
1,409.02
0.00
11323
1
U2
Vance
9,801
9.80
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
19l
0
Broad.
191
0.00
71.57
0.00
701.34
11323
2
U2
Vance
1.30
1.30
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
811-7131
191
191
0
Broad.
1911
0.00
71.57
(MO
93.03
11323
3
U2
Rion
2.30
2.30
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
155
155
0
Broad.
1 155
0.00
58.08
0.00
133.58
11323
4
U2
Vance
2.30
2,30
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tans
8/1-7/31
160
160
0
Broad.
160
0.00
59.95
OMI
137.88
11323
5
U2
Helena
11.90
11.90
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
811-7/31
165
165
0
Broad.
165
0.00
61.82
0.00
735.70
11323
6
U2
Vance
14.50
14.50
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
191
191
0
Broad.
191
0.001
71.57
0.00
1,037,70
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 17 of 32

a
i
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
AppGc.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Obs/A)
Ccmm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Appic
Method
Manure
PA
Nut -it
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)'
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
11323
7
U2
Helena
3.30
3.30
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
8/1-7131
165
165
0
Broad.
165
0.00
61.82
0.00
204.02
11399
1
U2
Georgeville
15.20
15.20
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
186
0
0
Broad.
186
0.00
69.69
0.00
1,059.32
11401
1
U2
Callison
21.10
21.10
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
156
0
0
Broad.
156
0.00
58.45
UO
1,233.32
11401
1a
U2
Georgeville
3.50
3.50
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
811-7131
173
0
0
Broad.
1 173
0.00
64.821
0.00
226.87
11402
1
U2
Georgeville
13.30
13.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3131
109
0
0
Broad.
65
0.00
24.50
0.00
325.91
11402
1
U2
Georgeville
13.30
13.30
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.0
411-9/15
135
0
0
Broad.
135
0 00
50.58
0.00
672.75
11487
1
1 U2
Helena
24.50
24.50
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
811-7/31
1 165
165
1 0
Broad.
165
0.00
61.92
0.00
1,514,67
11542
1
U3
Wynott
10.60
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
6.7 Tons
911.3/31
74
0
1 0
1 Irrig.
1 74
48.72
0.00
497.23
0.00
11542
1
U3
Wynott
10.60
10.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
9.7 Tons
4/1-9/15
74
0
0
Irrig.
74
48.72
0.00
497.23
0.00
11813
3
U2
Cecil
30.20
30.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
67
0.00
25.18
0.00
760.40
11813
3
U2
Cecil
30.20
30.20
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.0
4/1.9/15
1 137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
51.33
0.00
1,550.23
11813
4
U2
Cecil
LIO
1.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
67
0.00
25.18
0.00
27.70
11813
4
U2
Cecil
I.10
1.10
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.0
4/1-9/15
137
1 0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
51.33
0.00
56.47
11813
5
U2
Cecil
5.50
5.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
59
0.00
22.03
0.00
121.18
11813
5
U2
Cecil
5.50
5.50
Grain Sorghum, Silage
15.7
4/1-9/15
119
0
0
Broad,
119
UO
44.59
0-00
245.23
11813
6
U2
Wynott
9.80
9.80
Small Grain, Silage
5.6 Tons
911-3/31
62
0
0
Broad.
37
0.00
13.94
0.00
136.60
11813
6
U2
Wynott
9.80
9.90
Grain Sorghum, Silage
8.2 Tons
4/1-9/15
62
0
0
Broad.
62
O000
23.23
0.00
22T66
11814
1
U2
Vance
32.30
31.30
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
811-7/31
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
48.71
0.00
1,524,60
11814
2
U2
Wynott
20.00
19.00
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7131
1 117
0
1 0
Broad.
1 117
0.00
43.841
0.00
932.93
12031
1
U2
Vance
2.70
2.70
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Broad.
50
0.00
18.88
0.00
50.99
12031
1
U2
Vance
2.70
2.70
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.5
4/1.9/15
110
0
0
Broad.
110
0.00
41.22
0.00
111.28
12031
2
U2
Vance
5.50
5.50
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
4/l•3l31
84
0
D
Broad.
50
p.00
18.88
0.00
103.87
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: l 1/25/2015 WUT Page 18 of 32

i
Waste Utilization Table
Vear 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Obs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
. PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
Manurr-A
pphed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
]Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal1A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
12031
2
U2
Vance
5.50
5.50
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.5
4/1-9/15
110
0
0
Broad.
110
0.00
41.22
0.00
226.69
12033
1
U2
Chewacla-P
2.50
2.50
Small Grain, Silage
NIA
9/1-3131
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12033
1
U2
Chewacla-P
2.50
2.50
Grain Sorghum, Silage
23.8
411-9115
174
0
0
Broad.
174
0.00
65,20
0.00
162.99
12033
2
U2
Chewacla-P
0.50
0.50
Small Grain, Silage
N/A
911-3131
0
1 0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12033
2
U2
Chewacla-P
0.50
0.50
Grain Sorghum, Silage
23.8
4/1-9/15
174
0
0
Broad.
174
0.00
65.20
0.00
32.60
12033
3
U2
Chewacla-P
0.60
0.60
Small Grain, Silage
NIA
911-3131
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
12033
1 3
U2
Chewacla-P
0.60
0.60
Grain Sorghum, Silage
23.8
411-9/15
174
0
0
Broad.
174
0.00
65.201
0,00
39.12
12033
4
U2
Vance
8.70
8.70
Small Grain, Silage
7.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
78
1 0
0
Broad.
47
0,00
17,54
0.00
152.56
12033
4
U2
Vance
8.70
8.70
Grain Sorghum, Silage
13.3
4/1-9/15
101
0
0
Broad.
101
0.00
37.84
0,00
329.24
12033
5
U2
Vance
1.80
1.80
Small Grain, Silage
7.4 Tans
9/1-3/31
82
0
0
Broad.
491
0.00
18,43
0.00
33.18
12033
5
U2
Vance
1.80
1.80
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.1
4/1-9/15
1 107
0
0
Broad.
107
0,00
40,09
0.00
72.16
12033
6
U2
Cecil
12.30
12-30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
1 0
0
Broad.
64
0.00
24.05
0.00
295.88
12033
6
U2
Cecil
12.30
12.30
Grain Sorghum, Silage
17.1
4/1-9/15
130
0
1 0
Broad.
130
0.00
48.71
0.00
599.12
12058
1
U2
Wynott
1.70
1.70
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
71
0
0
Broad.
43
0.00
15.96
0.00
27,13
12058
1
U2
Wynott
1.70
1.70
Grain Sorghum, Silage
9.4 Tons
4/1-9/15
71
0
0
Broad.
71
0.00
26.60
0.00
45,22
12058
2
U2
Appling.
19.00
19.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.9
9/1-3/31
121
0
0
Broad.
73
0.00
27.20
0.00
516.85
12058
2
U2
Appling
19.00
19.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
20.2
411-9/15
154
0
0
Broad.
154
0.00
57.70
0.00
1,096.33
12058
3
U2
Wynott
5.90
5.90
Small Grain, Silage
6.7 Tans
9/1-3/31
74
D
1 0
Broad.
44
0.00
16.641
0.00
98.15
12058
3
U2
Wynott
5.90
5.90
Grain Sorghum, Silage
9.7 Tons
4/1-9/15
1 74
0
D
Broad,
74
0,00
27.73
0.00
163.59
12573
1
U3
Cecil
20.10
19.70
Small Grain, Silage
104
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Irrig.
115
75.72
0.00
1,491.65
0.00
12573
1
U3
Cecil
20.10
19.70
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.6
4/1-9/15
141
0
0
brig.
141
92.84
0.00
1,828.89
0.00
12573
2
U3
Vance
0.90
0.90
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
1 0
0
1 [rrig.
84
55.31
0.00
49.78
0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 19 of 32

r
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(lbs1A)
Cw=
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
¢bs/A)
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
12573
2
U3
Vance
0.90
0.90
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.5
411-9/15
Ito
0
0
Irrig.
110
72,43
0.00
65.18
0.00
12573
3
U3
Mecklenburg
10.70
10.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tans
911-3131
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62,55
0.00
669.28
0.00
12573
3
U3
Mecklenburg
10.70
10.70
Grain Sorghum, Silage
15.4
411-9/15
117
0
0
brig.
117
77,04
0.00
824.28
0.00
2938
1
U3
Helena
1.50
1.20
Small Grain, Silage
8.1 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
brig.
87
57.28
0.00
68.74
0.00
2938
1
U3
Helena
1-50
1.20
Grain Sorghum, Silage
12.9
4/1-9/15
97
0
0
Irrig.
9
63.87
0.00
7E64
0.00
2938
2
U3
Helena
2.00
1.70
Small Grain, Silage
8.1 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Irrig.
87
57.28
0.00
97.38
0.00
2938
2
U3
Helena
2.00
1.70
Grain Sorghum, Silage
12.9
1 411-9/15
97
0
0
brig.
97
63,87
0.001
108.57
0.00
2938
3
U3
Helena
6.80
6.20
Small Grain, Silage
8.1 Tons
911-3/31
87
0
0
Irrig.
87
57.28
0,00
355,15
0.00
2938
3
U3
Helena
6.80
6.20
Grain Sorghum, Silage
12.9
411-9/15
97
0
0
Irrig.
97
63,87
0.00
395.97
0.00
2938
4
U3
Helena
32.60
32.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Irrig.
80
52,67
0.00
1,685,55
0.00
2938
4
U3
Helena
32.60
32.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
11.8
411-9/15
88
0
0
Irrig.
88
58,60
0.00
1,875,19
0.00
2938
5
U3
Wynott
2.40
2.20
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
9/1.3/31
71
0
0
Irrig.
71
46,75
0.00
102.85
0.00
2938
5
U3
Wynott
2.40
2.20
Grain Sorghum, Silage
9.4 Tons
4/1-9/15
71
0
0
Irrig.
71
46,75
0.00
102,85
0.00
3182
1
U2
Helena
11.30
10.50
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tans
9/1-7/31
124
1
0
Broad.
123
0.00
46.09
0,00
483.91
3182
2
U2
Cecil
16.30
16.00
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Broad,
160
0.00
59.95
0,00
959.20
3182
3
U2
Vance
12.50
10.00
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
51.33
0.00
513.32
3192
4
U2
Cecil
13.00
10.00
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tans
811-7/31
153
0
0
Broad.
153
0,00
57.33
0,00
573.27
3182
5
U2
Appling
10.10
5.00
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
170
0
0
Broad.
170
0,00
63.70
0.00
318,48
3182
6
U2
Cecil
17.30
17.30
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
153
0
0
Broad.
153
0,00
57.33
0.00
991.76
3182
7
U2
Appling
4.40
4.20
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
170
0
0
1 Broad.
170
0,00
63.70
0.00
267.53
3182
1 8
U2
Appling
13.20
13.20
Fescue Pasture
5.2 Tons
8/1.7/31
173
0
0
Broad.
173
0.001,64.82
0,00
855,64
3505
1
U2
Georgeville
8.60
8.60
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
811-7/31
156
1 156
0
Broad.
156
0,00
58,45
0.00
502.68
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 20 of 32

1
4
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
I Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Rcgd
(1bs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(1bs/A)
Res.
(lbsIA)
Applic,
Method
Manua:
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsIA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
3505
2
U2
Georgeville
1.50
1.50
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
156
156
0
Broad.
156
0-00
59.45
0.00
87.68
3505
3
U2
Georgeville
9.60
9,60
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
156
156
0
Broad.
156
0.00
58.45
0.00
561.13
3515
1
U2
Georgeville
10.70
10.70
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7131
150
150
0
Broad.
150
0.00
56.20
0.001
601.37
3580
1
U2
Wynott
5.80
5.80
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
8I1-7131
169
169
0
Broad.
169
0.00
63.32
0.00
367.27
3580
2
U2
Wynott
1.30
L30
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
164
164
0
Broad.
104
0.00
61.45
0.00
79.88
3580
3
U2
Worsham
4.10
4.10
Fescue Hay
IS Tons
8/1-7131
148
148
0
Broad.
148
0.00
55.45
0.00
227.36
3580
4
U2
Wynott
4.80
4.80
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
811-7131
169
169
0
Broad.
169
0.00
63-32
0.00
303.95
3580
5
U2
Worsham
7.40
7.40
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
911-7/31
148
149
0
Broad-
1 148
0.00
55.45
0.00
410.36
3583
1
U3
Cecil
12.60
12.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Irrig.
115
75.72
0.00
954.05
0.00
3583
1
U3
lCecil
12.60
12.60
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.6
4/1-9/15
141
0
0
Irrig.
141
92.94
0.00
1,169.75
0.00
3583
2
U3
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Irrig.
115
75-72
O.00
325.59
0.00
3583
2
U3
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.6
4/1-9115
141
0
0
Irrig.
1 141
92.84
0.00
399.20
0.00
3583
3
U2
Pacolet
5.60
5.10
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
0
0
Broad,
130
0.00
48.71
0.00
248.42
3602
3
U3
Appling
2.40
2.40
Small Grain, Silage
11.3
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
Irrig.
125
82,30
0.00
197.53
0.00
3602
3
U3
Appling
2.40
2.40
Grain Sorghum, Silage
20.9
411-9115
159
0
0
Irrig.
159
104.69
O.00
251.25
0.00
3602
4
U3
Appling
0.50
050
Small Grain, Silage
11.3
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
1 Irrig.
125
82,30
0.00
41.15
0.00
3602
4
U3
Appling
0.50
0.50
Grain Sorghum, Silage
20.9
4/1-9/15
159
0
0
Irrig.
159
104-69
0.00
52.34
0.00
3602
5
U3
Appling
1.70
1.70
Small Grain, Silage
11.3
9/1-3/31
125
0
0
Irrig.
125
82.30
0.00
139.91
0.00
3602
5
U3
Appling
1.70
1.70
Grain Sorghum, Silage
X9
4/1-9/15
159
0
0
Irrig.
1 159
104.69
0.00
177.97
0.00
3602
6
U3
Vance
1.00
1.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
1 0
0
Irrig.
8
57,28
0-00
57.28
0.00
3602
6
U3
Vance
1.00
1,00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
15.0
4/1-9/15
114
0
0
Irrig.
114
75,06
0.00
75.06
0.00
3602
7
U3
Vance
4.10
4.10
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
D
0
Irrig.
8
57,28
0-00
234.86
0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 t/25/2015 WUT Page 21 of 32

a
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acre;
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Re#
Obs/A)
Canm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
ppiied
(acre)
Solid
Mann;
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
3602
7
U3
Vance
4.10
4,10
Grain Sorghum, Silage
15.0
4/1-9/15
114
0
0
Irrig.
114
75.06
0.00
307.75
0.00
3607
1
U2
Cecil
13.10
1310
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
49.83
0.00
652.82
3607
2
U2
Cecil
T 10
5.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
133 ,
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
49.83
0.00
249,17
3607
3
U2
Vance
2.90
2.90
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
51.33
0.00
148.86
3607
4
U2
Vance
2.80
2.80
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
0
0
Broad.
191
0.00
71.57
0.00
200.38
3607
5
U2
Cecil
3.80
3.80
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
204
0
0
Broad.
204
0.00
76.44
0.00
290,46
3607
6
U2
Cecil
3.60
3.60
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
191
0
0
Broad.
191
0.00
71.57
0.00
257.63
3622
1
U3
Georgeville
6.40
6.40
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irrig.
109
71.77
0.00
459.31
0,00
3622
1
U3
Georgeville
6.40
6.40
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.0
4/1-9/15
135
0
0
Irrig.
135
88,89
0.00
568.97
0.00
3622
2
U3
Georgeville
3.70
3.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irrig.
109
71.77
0.00
265.54
0,00
3622
2
U3
Georgeville
3.70
3.70
Grain Sorghum, Silage
1&0
411-9115
135
0
0
Irrig.
135
88.89
0.00
328.88
0.00
3622
3
U3
Georgeville
6.60
6.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3131
109
0
0
Irrig.
109
71.77
0.00
473.67
0.00
3622
3
U3
Georgeville
6.60
6.60
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.0
4/1-9115
135
0
0
brig.
135
88.89
0.00
586.65
0,00
3622
4
U3
Georgeville
7.00
7.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
911-3/31
109
0
0
Irrig.
109
71.77
0.00
502.37
0.00
3622
4
U3
Georgeville
7.00
7.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.0
4/1-9/15
135
0
0
brig.
135
88,89
0.00
622-211
0,00
3624
1
U3
lGeorgeville
8.90
8.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
112
73.74
0.00
626.82
0.00
3624
1
U3
Georgeville
8.90
8.50
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.6
411-9/15
140
0
0
Irrig.
140
92.18
0.00
783.52
0.00
3624
2
U3
Georgeville
16.80
16.40
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
1 112
73.74
0.00
1,209.38
0.00
3624
2
U3
Georgeville
16.80
16.40
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.6
4/1-9/15
140
0
0
Irrig.
140
92,18
0.00
1,511.73
0.00
3637
1
U2
Vance
13.60
13.60
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
143
0
Broad.
143
0.00
53.58
0,00
728.69
3637
2
U2
Vance
31 40
31.40
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
137
1 0
Broad.
137
0.00
51.33
0.00
1,611,83
3637
3
U2
Vance
11.70
11.70
Fescue Pasture
14.1 Tons
1 811-7/31
1 137
137
1 0
1 Broad.
137
0.00
51.33
0.00
600.59
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed- 11/25/2015 WUT Page 22 of 32

r
Waste Utilization Table
Vnar 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Read
(IbsIA)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
ppiied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
low
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
3637
4
U2
Vance
1.60
1.60
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
811-7/31
130
130
0
Broad.
130
0.00
48.71
0.00
77.93
3637
5
U2
Vance
14.10
14.10
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
130
0
Broad.
130
0.00
48.71
0.00
686.80
4365
1
U2
Wynott
10.50
10.50
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
811-7/31
127
127
0
Broad.
127
0.00
47.59
0.00
499.65
4367
l
U2
Helena
12.80
12.80
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3131
84
0
0
Broad.
50
0.00
18.88
OAO
241.72
4367
1
U2
Helena
12.80
12.80
Grain Sorghum, Silage
12.5
4/1-9/15
94
0
0
Broad.
1 94
0.00
35.22
&00
450.82
4367
2
U2
Helena
1.80
1.80
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3131
84
0
0
Broad,
50
0.00
18.88
&GO
33.99
4367
2
U2
Helena
1.80
1.80
Grain Sorghum, Silage
12.5
4/1-9/15
94
0
0
Broad_
94
0.00
35.22
0.00
63.40
4367
3
U2
Wynott
11.60
11.60
Small Grain, Silage
6.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
74
0
0
Broad.
44
0.00
16.64
0.00
192.98
4367
3
U2
Wynutt
11.60
11.60
Grain Sorghum, Silage
9.7 Tons
4/1-9/15
74
0
0
Broad,
1 74
0.00
27.73
0.00
321.63
4367
1 4
U2
Helena
0.60
0.60
Small Grain, Silage
8.1 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
1 0
0
Broad.
52
0.00
19.56
0.00
11.74
4367
4
U2
Helena
0.60
0.60
Grain Sorghum, Silage
12.9
4/1-9/15
97
0
0
Broad.
97
0.00
36.34
0.00
21.81
4371
3
U2
Wynott
4.30
4.30
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
127
127
0
Broad.
127
0.00
47.59
0.00
204.62
4371
4
U2
Wynott
5.10
5.10
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
117
117
0
Broad.
117
0.00
43.84
0.00
223.58
4376
1
U2
Wynott
10,40
IOAO
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31 1
127
127
0
Broad-
1 127
0.00
47.59
0.00
494.89
4376a
I
U2
Wynott
C50
4.50
Fescue Pasture
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
123
123
0
Broad.
123
0.00
46.09
0.00
207.39
4376a
2
U2
Wynott
13.60
13.60
Fescue Pasture
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
127
127
0
Broad.
127
0A0
4T59
0.00
647.16
4380
1
U2
Wynott
2,20
2.20
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
71
0
0
Broad.
43
0.00
15.96
0.00
35.12
4380
1
U2
Wynott
2.20
2.20
Grain Sorghum, Silage
9A Tons
4/1-9/15
71
0
0
Broad.
71
0.00
26.60
0.00
58.53
4380
2
U2
Wynott
13.40
13.40
Small Grain, Silage
6.1 Tons
911-3/31
68
0
0
Broad.
41
0,00
15.29
0.00
204.85
4380
2
U2
Wynott
13.40
13.40
Grain Sorghum, Silage
8.9 Tons
4/1-9/15
68
D
0
Broad.
68
UO
25.48
0.00
341.41
4380
3
U2
Wynott
3.20
3.20
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
71
0
0
Broad.
43
0.00
15.96
0.00
51.08
4380
3
U2
Wynott
3.20
3.20
Grain Sorghum, Silage
9.4 Tons
411-9/15
71
0
0
Broad.
71
0.00
26.60
0.00
85.13
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 23 of 32

a
a
Waste Utilization Table
Veer 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
pbs1A)
Comm
Fen,
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4380
4
U2
Wynott
9.70
9.70
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
71
0
0
Broad.
43
0.00
15.96
0.00
154.83
4380
4
U2
Wynott
9.70
9.70
Grain Sorghum, Silage
9.4 Tons
4/1-9115
71
0
0
Broad.
71
0.00
26.60
0.00
258.05
4404
1
U2
Vance
9.60
9.60
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7131
143
143
0
Broad.
143
0.00
53.58
0.00
514.37
4404
2
U2
Vance
8.80
8.80
Fescue Pasture
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
130
130
0
Broad.
130
0.00
48.71
0.00
428.64
4404
3
U2
Vance
8.20
8.20
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
137
0
Broad.
137
UO
51.33
0.00
420.92
4404
4
U2
Vance
4.80
4.80
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
811-7131
143
143
0
Broad.
143
UO
53.58
0.00
257.19
4404
5
U2
Vance
25.60
25.60
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
811-7/31
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
51.33
0.00
1,314.10
4419
1
U2
Wynott
2.20
2.20
Small Grain, Silage
6.7 Tons
911-3131
74
0
0
Broad.
44
0.00
16.64
0.00
36.60
4419
1
U2
Wynott
2.20
2.20
Grain Sorghum, Silage
9.7 Tons
4/1-9/15
74
0
0
Broad.
74
0.00
27.73
0.00
61.00
4419
2
U2
Wilkes
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage
5.6 Tons
911-3/31
70
0
0
1 Broad.
42
0.00
15.74
0.00
25.18
4419
2
U2
Wilkes
1.60
1.60
Grain Sorghum, Silage
8.2 Tons
4/1-9/15
69
0
0
Broad.
69
0.00
25.85
0.00
41.37
4419
3
U2
Wilkes
3.30
3.30
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
48
0.00
17.98
0.00
59.35
4419
3
U2
Wilkes
3.30
3.30
Grain Sorghum, Silage
9.4 Tons
411-9/15
79
0
0
Broad.
79
0.00
29.60
0.00
97.68
4419
4
U2
Wynott
22.90
22.90
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
71
0
0
Broad.
43
0.00
15.96
0.00
365.52
4419
4
U2
Wynott
22.90
22.90
Grain Sorghum, Silage
9.4 Tons
4/1-9/15
71
0
0
Broad.
71
0.00
26.60
0.00
609.20
4419
5
U2
Wynott
2.90
2.30
Small Grain, Silage
6.9 Tons
9/1-3/31
77
0
0
Broad.
46
0.00
17.31
0.00
39.82
4419
5
U2
Wynott
2.90
2.30
Grain Sorghum, Silage
10.0
4/1-9/15
76
0
0
Broad.
76
0.00
28.48
0.00
65.50
4419
6
U2
Wynott
2.90
290
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
71
0
0
Broad.
1 43
0.00
15.96
0.00
46.29
4419
6
U2
Wynott
2.90
2.90
Grain Sorghum, Silage
9.4 Tons
4/1-9115
71
0
0
Broad.
71
0.00
26.60
0.00
77.15
4427
!
U2
Appling
5.60
5,00
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
61
0.00
22.93
0.00
114.65
4427
!
U2
Appling
5.60
5.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
17.0
4/1-9/15
129
0
0
Broad.
129
0.00
48.33
0.00
241.67
4427
1 2
1 U2
Appling
55.80
55.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/173131
1 102
0
0
1 Broad.
6!
0.00
22.93
0.00
1,279.54
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 24 of 32

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
pbs1A)
Comm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
Obs/A)
Res.
(Ihs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
IOGO
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4427
2
U2
Appling
55.80
55.80
Grain Sorghum, Silage
17.0
4/1-9/15
129
0
0
Broad.
129
0.00
48.33
0.00
2,69T07
4427
3
U2
Cecil
1.70
1.10
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
59
0.00
22.03
0.00
24.23
4427
3
U2
Cecil
1.70
1.10
Grain Sorghum, Silage
15.7
4/1-9/15
119
0
0
Broad.
119
0.00
44.59
0.00
49.05
4457
1
U2
Helena
35.00
35.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Broad.
50
0.00
18.88
0.00
660.95
4457
1
U2
Helena
35.00
35.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
12.5
4/1-9/15
94
0
1 0
Broad.
94
0.00
35.22
0.00
1,232,72
4457
2
U2
Cecil
10.90
10,90
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
59
0,00
22.03
UO
240.14
4457
2
U2
Cecil
10.90
10.90
Grain Sorghum, Silage
15.7
4/1-9/15
119
0
0
Broad.
119
0.00
44.59
0.00
486.01
4457
3
U2
Wynott
17.00
17.00
Small Grain, Silage
6.1 Tons
9/1-3/31
68
0
0
Broad.
41
0.00
15.29
0.00
259.88
4457
3
U2
Wynott
17.00
17.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
8.9 Tons
4/1-9/15
68
0
0
Broad.
68
OAO
25.48
0.00
433.14
4457
4
U2
Chewacla-P
7.60
7.60
Small Grain, Silage
NIA
911-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
0
OAO
0.00
0.00
0.00
4457
4-
U2
Chewacla-P
7.60
7.60
Grain Sorghum, Silage
22.6
4/1-9/15
165
1 0
0
Broad.
165
OAO
61.82
0.00
469.86
4457
5
U2
Chewacla-P
3.60
3.60
Small Grain, Silage
NIA
911-3/3)
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4457
5
U2
Chewacla-P
3.60
3.60
Grain Sorghum, Silage
23.8
4/1-9/15
174
0
0
Broad.
174
0.00
65.20
0.00
234,70
4461
1
U2
Helena
11.30
11.30
Fescue Pasture
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
1 120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
44.96
0.00
508.08
4461
2
U2
Cecil
16.30
16.30
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
1 0
0
Broad.
143
0.00
53.58
0.00
873.36
4461
3
U2
Vance
12.SO
12.50
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
137
0
0
Broad,
137
0.00
51.33
0.00
641.65
4461
4
U2
Cecil
13.00
13.00
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
117
0
0
Broad.
117
0.00
43.84
0.00
569.90
4461
5
U2
Appling
10.10
10.10
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
170
0
0
Broad.
170
0.00
63.70
0.00
643.34
4461
6
U2
Cecil
17.30
17.30
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
1 0
0
Broad.
143
0.00
53.58
0.00
926,94
4461
7
U2
Appling
4.40
4.40
Fescue Pasture
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
160
0.00
59.95
0.00
263.78
4461
8
U2
ppling
13.20
13.20
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
170
0
0
Broad.
170
0.00
63.70
0.00
840.80
4462
I
U2
Wynott
5.80
5.80
Small Grain, Silage
6.1 Tons
9/1-3/31
68
0
0
Broad.
41
0.00
15.29
0.00
88.67
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 25 of 32

Waste utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
0a
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(lbs/A)
Comm
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
Obs/A)
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManumA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Feld)
N
N
N
N
low
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4462
1
U2
Wynott
5.80
5.80
Grain Sorghum, Silage
8.9 Tons
411-9/15
68
0
0
Broad.
68
0.00
25.48
0.00
147.78
4462
2
U2
Wynott
9.80
9.80
Small Grain, Silage
5.6 Tons
9/1-3t31
62
0
0
Broad.
37
0.00
13.94
0.00
136.60
4462
2
U2
Wynott
9.80
9.80
Grain Sorghum, Silage
8.2 Tons
4/1-9115
62
0
0
Broad.
62
&00
23.23
0.00
227.66
4462
3
U2
Wynott
3.50
3.00
Small Grain, Silage
5.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
62
0
1 0
Broad. 1
37
0.00
13.94
0.00
41.81
4462
3
U2
lWynott
3.50
3.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
8.2 Tons
4/1-9/15
62
0
0
Broad.
62
0.00
23.23
0.00
69,69
4462
4
U2
Cecil
12.50
12.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
64
0.00
24.05
0.00
300.68
4462
4
U2
Cecil
12.50
12.50
Grain Sorghum, Silage
17.1
4/1-9/15
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
48,7I
0.00
608.87
4463
1
U2
Cecil
7.10
7.10
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
1 0
Broad.
1 64
0.00
24,05
0.00
170.79
4463
1
U2
Cecil
7.10
7.10
Grain Sorghum, Silage
17.1
4/1-9/15
130
0
0
Broad.
130
0.00
48.71
0,00
345.84
4463
2
U2
Cecil
2.10
2.10
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3131
112
0
0
Broad.
67
0.00
25,18
0.00
52.88
4463
2
U2
Cecil
2,10
2.10
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.0
4/1-9115
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
51,33
0,00
107.80
4463
3
U2
Cecil
15.90
15.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
1 0
0
1Broad.
64
0.00
24,05
0.00
382.47
4463
3
U2
Cecil
15.90
15.90
Grain Sorghum, Silage
17.1
4/1-9115
130
0
0
1 Broad.
130
0.00
48,71
0,00
774.48
4466
1
U3
Cecil
52.20
52.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1.3/31
112
0
0
Irrig.
112
73,74
0.00
3,849,38
0.00
4466
1
U3
Cecil
52.20
52.20
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.0
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
1 137
90.20
0.00
4,708.62
0.00
4469
1
U2
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31.
98
1 0
0
Broad.
59
0.00
22.03
0.00
178.46
4469
1
U2
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Grain Sorghum, Silage
15.7
4/1-9/15
119
0
0
Broad,
119
0,00
44.59
0.00
361.16
4469
2
U2
Cecil
16.40
15.20
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
59
0.00
22,03
0.00
334.88
4469
2
U2
Cecil
16.40
15.20
Grain Sorghum, Silage
15.7
4/1-9/15
119
0
0
Broad.
119
0.00
44.59
O.OQ
67T73
4469
3
U2
Cecil
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
1 Broad.
67
0.00
25.18
0.00
50.36
4469
3
U2
lCecil
2.00
2.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.0
411-9/15
137
0
0
Broad.
137
0.00
51.33
0.00
102.66
4471
1- 12A
U3
Mecklenburg
7.61
7.61
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Irrig,
87
57.28
0.00
435.92
0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 26 of 32

4
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(1bs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic-
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4471
1 - 12A
U3
Mecklenburg
7.6E
7.61
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.1
4/1-9/15
107
0
0
Irrig.
j 107
70A5
0.00
536.13
0.00
4471
1- 12B
U3
Mecklenburg
5-85
5.95
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
[Trig.
87
57.28
0.00
335.10
0.00
4471
1- 12B
U3
Mecklenburg
5.85
5.85
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.1
4/1-9/15
107
0
0
Irrig.
107
70.45
0.00
412.14
0.00
4471
1 - 13A
U3
Mecklenburg
2-62
2.62
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
92
1 0
0
Irrig.
92
60.58
0.00
158.71
0-00
4471
I - 13A
U3
Mecklenburg
2.62
2.62
Corn, Silage
17.5
2115-6130
191
0
0
Irrig.
191
125.76
0.00
329.49
0-00
4471
l - 13B
U3
Mecklenburg
5.96
5.96
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
911-3/31
92
0
0
Irrig.
92
60.59
0.00
361.02
0.00
4471
1 13B
U3
IMecklenburg
5.96
596
Corn, Silage
17.5
2/15-6/30
191
0
0
Irrig.
1911
125-76
0-00
749.52
0.00
4471
1 - 14A
U3
Mecklenburg
3.68
3.68
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
1 0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
230.18
0-00
4471
1 - 14A
U3
Mecklenburg
3.68
3.68
Corn, Silage
18.0
2115-6130
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
474.91
0.00
4471
1 - 14B
U3
Mecklenburg
5.64
5.64
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
1 Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
352.78
0.00
4471
1 - 14B
U3
Mecklenburg
5.64
5.64
Corn, Silage
18-0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
727.84
0.00
4471
1- 15
U3
Mecklenburg
5.42
5.42
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
339.02
0.00
4471
1 - 15
U3
Mecklenburg
5.42
5.42
Com, Silage
18.0
2115-6130
196
0
1 0
Irrig.
196
129.05
000
699.45
0.00
4471
1 - 16
U3
Mecklenburg
7.27
7.27
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
454.74
0.00
4471
1 - 16
U3
Mecklenburg
7.27
7.27
Com, Silage
18.0
2115-6130
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
938.20
0.00
4471
1- dry
U2
Mecklenburg
24.65
24.65
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
1 80
0.00
29.97
0.00
738.88
4471
1- dry
U2
Mecklenburg
24.65
24.65
Com, Silage
152
2/15-6/30
166
1 0
0
Broad.
166
0.00
62.20
0.00
1,533.18
4471
2- l0A
U3
Mecklenburg
6.46
6.46
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.-
95
62.55
0.00
404.07
0.00
4471
2- IOA
U3
Mecklenburg
6.46
6.46
Com, Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
1961
129.05
0.00
833.66
0.00
4471
2 - IOB
U3
Mecklenburg
5.96
5.96
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
9/1-3/31
92
0
1 0
Irrig.
92
60.58
0.00
361.02
0.00
4471
2 - IOB
U3
Mecklenburg
5.96
5.96
Com, Silage
IT5
2/15-6l30
191
0
0
brig.
191
125.76
0.00
749.52
0.00
4471
2 - 11
1 U3
Mecklenburg
6.49
6.49
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Irrig.
87
5T26
0.00
371.76
0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 . Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 27 of 32

i
E
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
CropRYE
Applic.
Period
itrcgen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Qbs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
IOOD
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4471
2 - 1 I
U3
Mecklenburg
6.49
6.49
Corn, Silage
16.5
2/15-6/30
190
0
0
Irrig.
180
118.52
0_00
769-17
0.00
4471
2 - 9A
U3
Wynott
7.61
7.61
Small Grain, Silage
6.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
74
0
0
Irrig.
74
48-72
D.00
370.78
0.00
4471
2 - 9A
U3
Wynott
7.61
7.61
Corn, Silage
11.4
2115-6/30
124
0
0
Irrig.
124
81.64
0.00
621.31
0.00
4471
2 - 9B
U3
Wynott
6.33
6.33
Small Grain, Silage
6.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
74
0
0
Irrig.
74
46.72
0.00
308.42
0.00
4471
2 - 9B
U3
Wynott
6.33
6.33
Corn, Silage
11A
2/15-6/30
124
0
0
Irrig.
124
8L64
HO
516.81
0.00
4471
2 - dry
U2
Mecklenburg
12.25
12.25
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
87
0.00
32.60
HO
399.32
4471
2 - dry
U2
Mecklenburg
12,25
12.25
Corn, Silage
16.5
2/15-6/30
180
0
0
Broad.
180
0.00
67.44
0.00
826.18
4471
4- 1A
U3
Mecklenburg
6.66
6.66
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
416.58
0.00
4471
4- ]A
U3
Mecklenburg
6.66
6.66
Corn, Silage
18-0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
S59.47
0.00
4471
4 - 113
U3
Mecklenburg
7.61
7.61
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
476.00
0.00
4471
4 - 1 B
U3
Mecklenburg
7.61
7.61
Corn, Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
982.07
0.00
4471
4 - 2A
U3
Mecklenburg
6.73
6.73
Small Grain, Silage
8-6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
1 0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
420.96
0.00
4471
4 - 2A
U3
Mecklenburg
6-73
6.73
Corn, Silage
18.0
2115-6I30
196
0
0
brig.
196
129.05
0.00
868.51
0.00
4471
4 - 2B
U3
Mecklenburg
T25
7.25
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
brig.
95
62.55
0.00
453.49
0.00
4471
4 - 2B
U3
Mecklenburg
T25
7.25
Corn, Silage
1&0
2/15-6/30
1 196
0
0
Irrig_
196
129.05
HO
935.61
0.00
4471
4 - 3A
U3
Mecklenburg
60
6.80
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
425.34
0.00
4471
4 - 3A
U3
Mecklenburg
6.80
6.80
Corn, Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
brig.
196
129.05
0.00
87T54
0.00
4471
4 - 3B
U3
Mecklenburg
T 12
7.12
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.551
0.00
445.36
0.00
4471
4 - 3B
U3
Mecklenburg
7.12
7.12
Corn, Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
918.84
0.00
4471
4 - 4A
U3
Mecklenburg
5.74
5.74
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
911-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
359.04
0.00
4471
4 - 4A
U3
Mecklenburg
5.74
5.74
Cora Silage
1&0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
brig.
196
129.05
0.00
740.75
0.00
4471
4 - 4B
U3
Mecklenburg
4.90
4.90
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
O.DO
306.49
0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed- 11/25/2015
WUT Page 28 of 32

i
r
L_
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
@
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
itrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Obs/A)
Cmrm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
Man
pphed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tans
4471
4 - 4B
U3
Mecklenburg
4.90
4.90
Corn, Silage
18.0
2115-6130
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
632.35
0.00
4471
4 - 5A
U3
Mecklenburg
5.38
5.38
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.00
336.52
0.00
4471
4 - 5A
U3
Mecklenburg
5.38
5.38
Corn, Silage
18.0
2115-6130
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
694.29
0.00
4471
4 - 5B
U3
Mecklenburg
1.86
1.96
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
95
62.55
0.001
116.34
0.00
4471
4 - 5B
U3
Mecklenburg
1.86
1.86
Corn, Silage
1&0
2115-6130
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
240,03
0.00
4471
4-6
U3
Wynott
5.29
5.29
Small Grain, Silage
6.1 Tons
9/1-3/31
68
0
0
Irrig.
68
44.77
0.00
236.85
0.00
4471
4-6
U3
Wynott
5.29
5.29
Com, Silage
10.4
2/15-6130
113
0
0
Irrig.
113
74.40
0.00
393.58
0.00
4471
4-7
U3
Wynott
4.43
4.43
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
9/1-3131
71
1 0
0
Irrig.
1 71
46.75
0.00
20T09
0.00
4471
4-7
U3
Wynott
4.43
4.43
Com, Silage
11.0
2115-6130
120
0
0
Irrig.
120
79.01
0.00
350.02
0.00
4471
4- 8
U3
IMecklenburg
7.43
7.43
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3131
87
0
0
Irrig.
87
57.28
0.00
425.61
0.00
4471
4- 8
U3
Mecklenburg
7.43
7.43
Com, Silage
16.5
2115-6130
180
0
0
Irrig.
180
118.52
0.00
880.57
0.00
4471
4 - dry
U2
Mecklenburg
14.00
14.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
80
0.00
29.97
0.00
419.65
4471
4 - dry
U2
Mecklenburg
14.00
14.00
Corn, Silage
15.2
2/15-6130
166
0
0
Broad.
166
0.00
62.20
0.00
870.77
4471
5
U2
Mecklenburg
13.80
13.80
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
9/1-3131
1 92
0
0
Broad.
92
0.00
34.47
0.00
475.70
4471
5
U2
Mecklenburg
13.90
13.80
Com, Silage
17.5
2115-6130
191
0
0
Broad.
191
0.00
71.57
0.00
987.60
4471
6 - 17
U3
Mecklenburg
5.92
5.92
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Irrig.
1 95
62.55
0.00
370.30
0.00
4471
6 - 17
U3
Mecklenburg
5.92
5.92
Corn, Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
763.98
0.00
4471
6 - ISA
U3
Mecklenburg
4.52
4.52
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3131
95
1 0
0
Irrig.
1 95
62.55
0.00
282.73
0.00
4471
6 - 18A
U3
Mecklenburg
4.52
4.52
Corn, Silage
18.0
2/15-6/30
196
0
0
Irrig.
196
129.05
0.00
583.311
0.00
4471
6 - 18B
U3
Mecklenburg
3.55
3.55
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3131
87
0
0
Irrig.
87
57.28
0.00
203.35
0.00
4471
6 - 18B
U3
Mecklenburg
3.55
3.55
Corn, Silage
16.5
2/15-6/30
1 180
1 0
1 Irrig.
180
118.52
0,00
420.73
0.00
4471
6 - dry
U2
Mecklenburg
13.70
13.20
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3131
1 87
0
1 0
1 Broad.
1 8
D.OD
32,601
0.00
430.29
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015
WUT Page 29 of 32

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrcgen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
OWA)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(IWA)
Res.
¢bs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManurA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Mann:
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gallA
I Tons
1000 gals
tons
4471
6 - dry
U2
Mecklenburg
1170
13.20
Com, Silage
16.5
2/15-6/30
180
0
0
Broad.
180
0.00
67.44
0.00
890.26
4497
1
U2
Appling
12,70
12.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.6
9/1-3131
118
0
0
Broad.
118
0,00
44.21
0.00
561.51
4497
1
U2
Appling
12,70
12.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
42 bu.
4/1-9115
163
0
0
Broad.
163
0.00
61.07
0.00
775.64
4536
1
U2
Vance
6.50
6.50
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
191
0
Broad
1 191
0.00
71.57
0.00
465A7
4536
2
U2
Varina
3.50
3.50
Fescue Hay
3.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
133
133
0
Broad.
133
0.00
49.83
0.00
174,42
4536
3
U2
Wynott
2.00
2.00
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
155
155
0
Broad.
155
0.00
58.09
0.00
116.15
4536
4
U2
Wynott
3,30
3.30
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
155
155
0
Broad.
155
0.00
58.08
0.00
191.65
4536
5
U2
Vance
3.30
3.30
Fescue Hay
3.9 Tons
8/1.7/31
173
173
0
Broad.
173
0.00
64.82
0.00
213.91
4536
6
U2
Wynott
1.80
1.80
Fescue Hay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
155
155
0
Broad.
155
0.00
58.0E
0.00
104.54
4539
1
U2
Vance
11.50
11.50
Fescue Hay
3.9 Toni
8/I-7/31
173
0
0
Broad.1
173
0.00
64.82
0,00
745.44
4539
2
U2
Vance
23.90
21.50
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
8/1.7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
160
0.00
59.95
0.00
1,288.92
4539
3
U2
Chewacla-P
3.50
3.50
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
152
0
0
Broad.
152
0.00
5695
0.00
199.33
4539
4
U2
Cecil
5,80
5.90
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
204
0
0
Broad.
204
0.00
76.44
0.00
443.33
4543
l
U3
Cecil
7.00
7.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
911-3/31
115
0
0
Irrig.
115
75.72
0.00
530.03
0.00
4543
l
U3
Cecil
7.00
7.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.6
4/1-9115
141
0
0
Irrig.
141
92.84
0.00
649.86
0.00
4592
l
U2
Georgeville
8.20
7.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
911-3131
1 109
0
0
Broad.
65
0.00
24.50
0.00
171.53
4592
1
U2
Georgeville
8.20
7.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
18.0
411-9/15
135
0
0
1 Broad.
135
0.00
50.58
0.00
354.08
4592
2
U2
Georgeville
11.30
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Torts
911-3/31
104
0
0
1 Broad.
62
0.00
23.38
0.00
- 23180
4592
2
U2
Georgeville
11.30
10.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
17.1
4/1-9/15
128
0
0
Broad.
128
0.00
47.96
0.00
479.60
4894
1
U2
Appling
23.80
23.80
Fescue Pasture
5.1 Tons
811.7/31
170
0
0
Broad.
170
0.00
63,70
0.00
1,515,98
4894
2
U2
Helena
20.00
20.00
Fescue Pasture
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
120
1 0
0
Broad.
1120
0.00
44.96
0.00
899,2S
4894
3
U2
Cecil
8,30
8.30
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0,00
49,83
0.00
413,62
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed- 11/25/2015 WUT Page 30 of 32

i
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Obs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Mangy
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
I000
ga11A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4894
4
U2
Appling
20.80
20.80
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0,00
44,96
0.00
935.23
4894
5
U2
Vance
9.30
9.30
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7131
117
0
0
Broad.
117
0.00
43.84
0.00
407.70
4894
6
U2
Rion
48.60
45.00
Fescue Pasture
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
Broad.
120
0.00
44.96
0.00
2,023.31
5805
l
U2
Wynott
30,20
30.20
Fescue Pasture
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
123
0
0
Broad.
123
0.00
46.09
0.00
1,391.81
5805
2
U2
Wynott
5.10
5.10
Fescue Pasture
3.7 Tons
8/1-7/31
123
0
0
Broad.
123
0.00
46.09
0.00
235.04
5805
3
U2
Wynott
21.60
21.60
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
117
0
0
Broad.
117
0.00
43.84
0.00
946.91
5805
1 4
U2
lWynott
41.00
41.00
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7131
1 117
0
1 0
Broad.
117
0.00
43.84
0.00
1,797.37
5820
l
U2
Wynott
30.20
30.20
Fescue Pasture
3.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
107
0
0
Broad.
107
0.00
40.09
0.00
1,210.76
5820
2
U2
Wynott
5A0
5.10
Fescue Pasture
3.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
107
0
0
Broad.
107
0.00
40.09
0.00
204.47
5820
3
U2
Wynott
21.60
21.60
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
117
0
0
Broad,
117
0.00
43.84
0.00
946.91
5820
4
U2
Wynott
41.00
41.00
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
E 17
0
0
Broad.
1171
0.00
43.84
0.00
1,797.37
6147
1
U2
Appling
8.90
8.90
Fescue Hay
5.2 Tons
8/1-7131
231
231
0
Broad,
231
0.00
86.55
0.00
770.32
9062
l
U3
Vance
5.30
5.30
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3131
84
0
0
Irrig.
84
55.31
0.00
293.13
0.00
9062
1
U3
Vance
5.30
5.30
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.5
4/1-9115
110
0
0
Irrig.
110
72.43
0.00
383.86
0.00
9062
2
U3
Vance
5.70
5.70
Small Grain, Silage
T6 Tons
9/1-3131
84
0
0
Irrig.
84
55.31
0.00
315.25
0.00
9062
2
U3
Vance
5.70
5.70
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.5
4/1-9115
110
0
0
Irrig.
110
72.43
0.00
412.83
0.00
9062
3
U3
Vance
6.60
6.60
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3131
84
0 i
0
Irrig.
84
55.311
0.00
365.03
0.00
9062
3
U3
Vance
6.60
6-60
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.5
4/1-9/15
110
0 1
0
brig.
110
72.43
0.00
478.01
0.00
9062
4
U3
Vance
3.00
3.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
911-3/3l
84
0
0
brig.
84
55.31
0.00
165.92
0.00
9062
4
U3
Vance
3.00
3.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.5
4/1-9115
110
0
0
brig.
110
72.43
0.00
217.28
0.00
9062
5
U3
Vance
4.60
4.60
Small Grain, Silage
7.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
82
0
0
brig.
82
53.99
0.00
248.36
0.00
9062
5
U3
Vance
4.60
4.60
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.1
411-9/15
107
0
0
brig.
107
70.45
0.00
324.07
0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 31 of 32

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Cmun
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Iles.
(Ibs1A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Mann:
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
9062
6
U3
Vance
7.20
7.20
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
911-3/31
84
0
0
Irrig.
84
55.31
0.00
398.21
0.00
9062
6
U3
Vance
7.20
7.20
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.5
4/1-9/15
110
0
0
Irrig.
110
72,43
0.00
521.47
0.00
9062
7
U3
Vance
8.40
8.40
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Irrig.
84
55.31
0.00
464.58
0.00
9062
7
U3
Vance
8 40
8.40
Grain Sorghum, Silage
14.5
4/1-9115
110
0
0
Irrig.
110
72.43
0.00
608.3$
0.00
9347
I
U2
lWynott
3.60
3.60
Fescue Hay
3.7 Tons
8/1-7131
164
0
Q
1 Broad.
164
0,00
61.45
O.Qo
22112
9532
I
U3
Badin
23.60
23.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3131
103
0
0
Irrig.
103
67.82
0.00
1,559.80
0.00
9532
1
U3
Badin
23.60
23.00
Grain Sorghum, Silage
17.8
4/1-9115
134
1
0
Irrig,
133
87.57
0.00
2,014A0
0.00
9810
1
U2
Pacolet
14.90
13.00
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
8/1-7/3 1
160
0
0
Broad.
160
0.00
59.95
0.00
779.35
999
1
U2
Nanford
1.20
1 20
Fescue Pasture
4.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
49.83
0.00
59.80
999
2
U2
Nanford
3.90
3.90
Fescue Pasture
4A Tans
8/1-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
l33
0.00
49.83
0.00
194.35
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
79,415.66
_
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
21,966.50
Balance, 1000 gallons
-57,449.16
Total Applied, tons
-
91,901.46
Total Produced, tons
-
74,000.00
Balance, tons
-
17,901.46
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2, Symbol * means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/25/2015 WUT Page 32 of 32

RECEIVED
`;.' N.C.Dept. of ENR
NCDENRWinston-Salem
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural ResbiZes2eglonalofflce
Pat McCrory
Governor
July 2, 2014
Koopman Dairies Inc
Koopman Dairies Inc
204 Lloyd Rd
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Additional Information Request
Application No. AWC760060
Koopman Dairies Inc
Randolph County
Dear Koopman Dairies Inc:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
The Animal Feeding Operation Branch of the Division of Water Resources (Division) has completed a
preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is required
before we may continue our review. Please address and submit the following item(s) within 30 (thirty)
days of receipt of this letter:
Missinla Copies of Field Maps only:
Our records'show that we have received a copy of your waste utilization plan (WUP) or
nutrient management plan (NMP). However, copies of the field maps are missing in your WUP
or NMP.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised
and/or additional documentation shall be signed, dated and sent to my attention at the address below.
Information can also be submitted electronically at [e-mail].
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have anyquestions regarding this letter,
Sincerely,
J. R. Joshi
Animal Feeding Operations Branch
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
WQROS Unit Central Files - AWC760060
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone: [phone](A \ Internet: htt�://www.ncdenr.gov///www.ncdenr.gov/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

Rosebrock, Melissa •
From: Sam Bingham <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 9:28 AM
To: Rosebrock, Melissa
Subject: Re: Proposed WSP at Koopman Dairy #76-60
Thank you for the information.
Sam Bingham
845 Baber Road
Rutherfordton, NC 28139
828-429-6798
From: "Rosebrock, Melissa" <melissa.rosebrock cbncdenr.gov>
To: "sam.bin ham att.net" <sam.bingharnCaDatt.net>
Cc: "Joshi, J.R." <'a a.'oshi ncdenr. ov>
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 7:55 AM
Subject: Proposed WSP at Koopman Dairy #76-60
Sam,
Good to talk with you yesterday. Attached is the most recent version of the Certification Form needed for
the new WSP at Koopman Dairies.
Please complete page 1 and section II.A. of the form and submit, along with the design information, to Mr.
Jaya Joshi at NCDENR-DWR-Animal Feeding Operations, 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636.
JR's number is 919.807.6341.
Also Include a short letter stating that: 1) the facility is increasing their storage capacity; 2) the facility is
NOT increasing their permitted number; 3) and that the acreage for land application will not be reduced
below the required acreage (or something to that effect). It will be supported by what is completed on the
certification form as well.
After installation of the WSP is complete, please send as -built design and certification form, with section
III.A. completed, to JR again. Assuming everything is complete, JR will send written approval and you are
good to go. I understood from our conversation that the design is not yet complete so I will complete the
stream classification page and return to you so that you might send a complete -package to JR (this is
different than what I had said during our call ... I got to thinking).
Please let me know if you
Best regards,
Melissa
have any questions or concerns.
Melissa Rosebrock
E-mail Address: melissa.rosebrock@nr. enr.gov
NCDENR Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]; fax [phone]

Oct 0713 11:25a Koopman Dairies, Inc. •7048764909
.t
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section
Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM
Director
Notice of Exemption
September 23, 2013
Koopman Dairies
Attn: Mr. Ard Koopman
204 Lloyd Road
Statesville, North Carolina 28139
RE: Koopman Waste Pond #4 Dam
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Koopman:
p.2
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E Skvarla, III, Secretary
The information received in our office on September 11, 2D13, via e-mail transmittal regarding
the proposed dam has been reviewed. Also, Land Quality Section personnel from the Winston-
Salem Regional Office conducted an inspection of the dam site and downstream areas on
September 19, 2013, to confirm the proposed low hazard classification. Based on the above -
referenced information and site inspection, our office concurs that a lowhazardpclassification is
warranted based on the current development downstream from the proposed dam. As a result of
this hazard classification and the proposed dam's height of 24� 9 feet and impoundment capacity
of 21.9 acre-feet, an exemption to the North Carolina Darn Safety Law of 1967 is hereby granted
per § 143 -215.25A(a)(6) of the North Carolina General Statutes.
However, the follov.A g comments are offered:
Our office encourages the owner of any proposed dam to construct his dam to the same
standards as if it were under the jurisdiction of the Dam Safety Law of 1967.
2. If the darn is constructed such that it is 25 feet in height or greater as measured from the
highest point on the crest of the dam to the lowest point on the downstream toe and will
impound 50 acre _-fee`- more at the highest point on the crest of the dam, this dam -will
not be exempt, and engineering certification, and record drawings and specifications will
be required along with application processing fees.
3. If future downstream development occurs which would be impacted by a failure of the
dam, then the hazard classification may be reassessed and may change from low to either
intermediate or high hazard classification. Please note that in accordance with General
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 - Telephone [phone] FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 - Internet: hftp:/,';)ortal.ncdenr.org/web/]rPand:gualitv
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 1 10% Post Consumer Paper

Oct 0713 11:25a Koopman Dairies, Inc.
,, • •
Mr. Ard Koopman
Notice of Exemption
September 23, 2013
Page 2 of 2
•7048764909 p.3
•
Koopman Waste Pond #4 Dam
Randolph County
Statute 143-215.25A(a)(6), dams which are determined to be high hazard are subject to
the provisions of the Dam Safety Law of 1967 regardless of height or impoundment
capacity.
The Army Corps of Engineers and the Water Quality Section of this Department should be ,, r
`
contacted to determine if additional permits are required. Also, the erosion -and sediment control ivor,
program having jurisdiction should be contacted to determine permit requirements. In any case, i�01
sediment must be prevented from entering the waters of the state or flowing onto neighboring
property.
Please contact Mr. Matthew Gantt, PE: Regional Engineer, Land Quality Section, 585
Waughtown Street, Winton -Salem, North Carolina 27107, telephone number [phone], or
me at telephone number [phone] should you have questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
Q41'4-
Steven -M. McEv E
State Dam Safety ineer
Land Quality Section
SMMiw•hd
cc: Mr. Samuel Bingham, PE, Design Engineer
Mr. Matthew Gantt, PE, Land Quality Regional Engineer
Filename: 12.4NDO- 20130923_NOE_Koopman Waste Pond #4 Dam

• •
6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION:
00
N.C.Dept. of ENR
SEP 13 2013
Winston.Salem
This form must be completed by the appropriate DWQ regional office and included as a part of the
project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward) in
which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWQ regional office.
Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, with items 1 through 6
completed, to the appropriate Division of Water Quality Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor (see page 6 of 10). At a
minimum, you must include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete,application form and submit the
application package.
6.1 Farm Name: Kogpman Dairies, Inc.
6.2 Name & complete address of engineering firm: Samuel C. Bing -ham, PE, 845 Baber Road, Rutherfordton, NC 28139
Telephone number: ( 828 ) 429 - 6798
6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: Sandy Creek
6.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located Randolph County
6.5 Map name and date: Grays Chapel, 1997
6.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
r
TO: R GIONAL AQUIFER PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be. or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s): _ ^ , _
Name of surface waters: AOAAYJA UA-"— FC—
Classification (as established by the En ronmental Management Commission): 7 46 `(o
Proposed classification, if applicable: NA
Signature of regional office personnel:
(All attachments must be signed)
Date:I QISIAL�o—
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5

G&SWAPEL QUADRANOLE
NORTH OLINA—RANDOLPH CO. tpl.�ip
0
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
4 1620 40' 1621 622� 1810000 FEET 1 '30"
"M . C
4�5- "I I .. . . )A t 35*52130'
�tv' ��2
"U.
44"
V �14 7-v
z q V, 5r. 3970
;KKI 1K
S\ 770000
---r -fEET
y
L
Randal
Ld
r-A
--V
Ld
V-
<
Vol
'IV j
I 1z
FIZ, A:
PIN
V1 t
q
-.V
BM 681 t
Wori,
r 'Y
Oa
3%7
WL
�0: �N,
t
E 19
500
GV P
X"41 '14
12.
Name: GRAYS CHAPEL Location: 035* 51' 12.2" N 079* 38'53.3" W
Date: 9/101113 Caption: Koopman Dairies, Inc.
Scale: I inch equals 2000 feet Liberty Farm
Randolph County, North Carolina
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.

For J N. 1 Sl a O! 01-.0 _.....::_ i
Notification of Change of Ownership
Animal Waste Management Facility
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. of ENR
JAN 2 0 2012
Winston-Salem
In accordance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2T .1304(c) and 15A NCAC 2T .1305(d) this form is offs N notification
to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) of the transfer of ownership of an Animal Waste Management Facility. This form
must be submitted to DWQ no later than 60 days following the transfer of ownership.
General Information: (A": Me-c-edeA ; � M; 1L f M 5 ki LO
Name of Farm: 0 1 .,, '0a; w y E girl se-5 FacilityNo: �-
previous Owner(s) N
New Owner(s) Name
Mailing Address: —
Farm Location:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road names, directions,
milepost, etc.): -_ . Q ON c, 4?--
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
7} pe of Cattle No. - i nimi.
)Iiltairy
❑ Beef ..�a,�° /dad
Number of Animals:
creage Available for Application: a 1 r� € Required Acreage: r !•
3 G 1 9 Cubic Feet(0)
Number of Lagoons /Storage Ponds : Total Capacity: M ,�_
*wrtwrt*rtwwww*rtwwwwww**wwwwwwww**w*+�**r***w***rt*****w*w****w**rt****rt*rtwt********rtwwrt**
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
❑ Layer
❑ Pullets
Other Type of Livestock:
Owner 1 Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) for the farm named above
and will implement these procedures. I (we) know that any modification or expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a permit modification before the new animals
are stocked. 1 (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage or application system to
surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year,
24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal•waste. I (we) understand that this facility may be
covered by a State Non -Discharge Permit or a NPDES Permit and completion of this form authorizes the Division of Water
Quality to issue the required permit to the new land owner.
p,C1.1 Name of Pre ' us L Own
4 ' Signature, Date:
Name of New Land Owner:
P(� ,Signature.- Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Please sign and return this form to: "N C. Division of Water Quality
Rx� Aquifer Protection Section
An)inal Feeding Operations Ifnli'
CJ'�S U u h+0U3 163GMail Service Center,
.Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
May 2, 2007
;-1107

7_j
0
Animal Woste Management System Operator Designation Form
Facility/Farm Name:
WPCSOCC
NCAC 15A 8F .0201
70rrcn 0:wI0 lrx
Permit #: 19 cc 71%,C ...„_ Facility ID#: County: PC� �C bIpb _
Operator In Charge (OIC)
Name: L I_ S l+ / E , L4w5S
First IMiddle Last Jr. Sr, etc.
Cert Type 1 Number:A WE f as_o Work Phone: �isO - 76 5 �
Signature. Date: f r ! 3 a-
" C certify drat I agree to my designation as the Operator in Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the rules
and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities set forth in 15A NCAC 08F .0203 and failing to do so can result in Disciplinary
Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Back-up Operator In Charge (Back-up OIC) • (Optional)
First Middle Last Jr, Sr, etc.
Cert Type / Number: Work Phone:
Signature: Date:
I certify that i agree to my designation as Back-up Operator in Charge for the facility noted. fanderstand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibiiities set forth in 15A NCAC 08F .0203 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Owner/Peruuttee Name: LQQQrnCtn _ Oawn _ fnc_
r
Phone #: Fax#: (?Oc.�) _G
Signature: Date: 1/8u11a .
(owner or authorized agent)
Mail or fax to: WPCSOCC
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1618
Fag: 919-733-1338
(Retain a copy of this forth for your records)
Revised V20M