The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About760050_PERMITTING_20171231Supplemental Information Included As Part Of This CNMP 1. SoilFacts: Best Management Practices for Agricultural Nutrients. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Publication AG-439-20 (03/91). 2. Soi/Facts: Dairy Manure as a Fertilizer Source. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Publication AG-439-28 ((02/94). 3. SoilFacts: Nitrogen Management and Water Quality. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Publication AG-439-2 (08/90). 4. Soi/Facts: The North Carolina Phosphorus Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT). North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Publication AGW-439-56 (01105). 5. Soil Fertility Note 16: Gearing Up For Conservation Tillage. Agronomic Division, N.C. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (02/95). 6. Soil Testing: Enhancing Land Productivity, Nutrient Use Efficiency & Environmental Quality. Agronomic Division, N.C. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (08/06). 7. Waste Analysis: Improving Agricultural Productivity & Environmental Quality. Agronomic Division, N.C. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (10/07). 8. Record Keeping Forms: • 2008 Daily Rainfall, Weekly Freeboard, Monthly Stocking & 1" Rainfall Check • IRR-1 Record Irrigation Events on Different Fields • IRR-2 One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle • SLD-1 Record Manure Solids Application Events on Different Fields • SLD-2 One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle • SLUR-1 Record Slurry/Lagoon Sludge Application Events on Different Fields • SLUR-2 One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle • FRBD-1 Waste Structure Freeboard & Daily Precipitation Record • CROP-1 Crop Yield Record Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization This plan has been prepared for: Willliams Dairy Richard Williams 3385 Williams Dairy Rd. Liberty, NC 27298-8135 336-622-4762 03-21-2008 This plan has been developed by: Joe Hudyncia USDA-NRCS 241 Sunset Avenue, Suite 105 Federal Building Asheboro, NC 27203 336 629-4449, Ext, 3 Developer Signature Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan. Signature (owner) Date Signature (manager or producer) ate This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission. V Plan Approved By: 424/Ax-� Technical Specialist Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------•--------------------•---------------------------•---•-- •------------------------ Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-21-2008 Cover Page 1 Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following source(s): Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan. U6 Williams Dairy (Liquid Only) waste generated 343,250 gals/year by a 250 animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 814 Incorporated 1265 Injected 1369 Irrigated 866 Max. Avail. PAN (lbs) * Actual PAN Applied (lbs) PAN Surplus/ Deficit (lbs) Actual Volume Applied (Gallons) Volume Surplus/ Deficit (Gallons) Year 1 866 965 -99 382,374 -39,124 U9 Williams Dairy (Solids Only) waste generated 4,200.00 tons/year by a 250 animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid operation. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 18060 Incorporated 23940 Injected N/A Irrigated NIA Max. Avail. PAN (lbs) * Actual PAN Applied (lbs) PAN Surplus/ Deficit (lbs) Actual Quantity Applied (Tons) Surplus/Deficit (Tons) Year 1 22,490 36190 -13,700 7,385.75 -3,185.75 This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42 entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source. L� ----- ------------ - -- -- ----------------- Note:....In source- ID, S means stan-dard source-,- U means user defined source. * Max, Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source. 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 Source Page Page I of I Narrative WILLIAMS DAIRY, LLC September 2007 This 250 head dairy operation is owned by Richard & Barbara Williams, and Jeanette Williams, and is operated by Richard Williams. The farm is located in northeast Randolph County (Liberty Township), approximately seven miles west of Liberty, NC on Williams Dairy Rd. The physical address of the farm is 3385 Williams Dairy Rd., Liberty, NC. Animal waste is applied from two sources: broadcast solids and irrigated liquids. Waste is scraped from the lot into an open stack with the solids seperated using pickets. The liquid waste from this operation then drains to the single waste storage pond, which is a dairy liquid manure slurry. There are 8.52 acres under solid set irrigation for the disposal of the liquid waste from the storage pond. The remaining solid waste is broadcast applied using a manure spreader. Refer to the -included maps for details about field location, size, soil types, etc. The included maps also indicate the approximate location of irrigation coverage in the two fields (Tract 4490) with solid set irrigation. There are 9 hydrants in field 18 and 5 hydrants in field 20. The predominant crop rotation on this farm is corn silage followed by small grain silage. Conventional tillage is used for corn production so that broadcast animal waste is soil -incorporated. A no -till planter is used for planting small grain into corn stubble. For this crop waste is broadcast applied without incorporation. Pasture and hay land are integral to the dairy operation and are maintained under a high level of management. Rotational grazing is used on much of the pasture land. Fescue pasture is overseeded with Marshall Ryegrass in the fall to extend the season of high -quality pasture for the cattle and also help conserve soil, water and nutrients. The DWQ Facility I.D. is AWC760050. This dairy operation lies within the Cape Fear River Basin. The five tracts that comprise this dairy farm contain and/or border several unnamed tributaries of Sandy Creek and two of the tracts border Sandy Creek directly. Nutrients are to be applied according to the attached Nutrient Management Plan in order to maximize plant production, properly utilize manure on these fields, and minimize off -site transport of the nutrients applied. This plan identifies the amount, source, placement, and timing of nutrients to be applied for these fields. Nitrogen application rates are based on realistic yield expectations for the crop, soil type and field slope. Application rates for other nutrients and amendments are based on a soil test. Waste applications must be made in accordance with land application setbacks as set by the state of North Carolina, as well as applicable federal and local laws. Current setbacks are available at the NC Division of Soil & Water Conservation 1217 guidance website: http://www.enr.state.nc.us/DSWC/pages/guidance—docs.htmi Because animal waste is being applied, all fields in this plan have been evaluated for potential phosphorous loss using the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Too] (PLAT). (*Phosphorous lost from fields can become pollution in surface water through surface runoff, erosion of soil or by leaching). The PLAT rating for each field is listed in the Planned Crops Summary section of this waste plan. A field with a PLAT rating of 'low' or'medium' requires no additional measures. A rating of high will require reduced Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 Narrative Page Page 1 of 3 Narrative manure applications, and a rating of 'very high' will require ceasing all waste applications to that field. All PLAT calculations for this plan were done using the most recent waste analysis report (W07756) dated 3/30/2007. Soils information was obtained from the most recent soil test report (32088) dated 4/ 17/2007, All maps included with this plan have been generated specifically for use with Nutrient Management planning and implementation. Aerial images from the Farm Service Agency's (2006) National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) were used for generation of plan maps with photographs. Road, stream, soils and parcel information were obtained from Randolph County's GIS database. Important considerations: *Soil tests are to be taken.annually on all fields that receive animal waste. *Waste analyses are to be taken within 60 days of applying waste from a source. *Manure should not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting new crops or to forages breaking dormancy. Otherwise applications are made to actively growing crops. *When any commercial fertilizers are used (including starter fertilizer), they need to be included in the nutrient budget and recorded on the appropriate record -keeping form. *Liming material should be applied as indicated by the soil test to adjust soil pH to the specific range required by the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum availability and utilization of nutrients. *Application equipment (irrigation, honey wagons, manure spreaders, etc.) are to be properly calibrated to ensure uniform distribution of material at planned rates. *Accurate harvest records are always beneficial for future planning and decision making. Summary of Tracts with waste application fields included in this CNMP: Tract Fields Acres Owner 4484 5 31.2 Williams, J. 4490 3 12.7 Williams, J. 4564 4 56.6 Williams, J. 4565 6 48.7 Williams, R. & B. 4583 3 28.0 Williams, J. *ORIGINAL WASTE PLAN VOLUME CALCULATIONS FOR DISPOSAL (User Defined Sources) 250 cows x 1.96 cu. ftJcow/day x 120 days of storage x 100% confinement = 58,800 cu. ft. of storage --------------- - ------------- --- --..----...--------------....-....-...-----...------------- 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 Narrative Page Page 2 of 3 I 0 .0 Narrative needed for waste generated from milk cows for the time they are on the lot. TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED: 58,800 cu. ft. for 120 days of storage of all waste generated for all animals. (Excluding storage needed for lot runoff from rain events and storms) SOLIDS: 250 caws--58,800 cu. ft (total waste produced for time on the lot for 120 days). x 1.5 cu. ft./cow/day (solids) / 1.96 cu. ft./cow/day (total) = 45,000 cu. ft. (solids for 120 days) 145,000 cu. ft. (cows) x 3 (no. of 120 day periods in a year = 135,000 cu. ft./yr 135,000 cu. ft./yr x 62.4 lbs/cu. ft. =8,424,000 lbs./yr 8,424,000 lbs./yr. / 2000 lbs./ton = 4212 tons/yr. 4212 tons/yr. / 250 head = 16.8 tons/head/yr. of solids LIQUIDS: COWS: 58,800 cu. ft. (total waste produced for time on lot for 120 days). x 0.46 cu. ft./cow/day (liquid)1 1.96 cu. ft./cow/day (total = 13,800 cu. ft. (liquids for 120 days) {13,800 cu. ft. (cows) x 3 (no. of 120 day periods in a year) = 41,400 cu. ft./yr. 41,400 cu. ft./yr. x 7.48 gals./cu.ft. = 309,672 gals./yr. 309,672 gals./yr. (from animals) 33,598 gals./yr. (lot run-off) (5889/open drystack, 9592/lot runoff, 5500/25yr lot runoff, 12,617/25 yr pond surface) ---------------- 33,598 gals./250 head = 1373 gals./head/yr. of liquids --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- 230981 Database Version 3.1 bate Printed: 01-16-2008 Narrative Page Page 3 of 3 C7 • The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. ' Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available. If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crap is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High. Planned Crops Summary 205 PlTA Total Useable Plat Removal (lbs/acre) Applied (Ibs/acre) Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE 4484 2 5.60 5.60 Low NIA Vance Orchardgrass Hay 2.9 Tons 42 NIA 4484 3 4.001 4.00 Low I NIA Vance Small Grain, Silage 6.4 Tons 35 NIA Corn, Silage 14.4 Tons 49 NIA 4484 4 6,60 6.60 Low N/A Vance Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons 38 NIA Corn, Silage 15.7 Tons 53 NIA 4484 5 8.20 8.20 Low NIA Cecil Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons 52 NIA Corn, Silage 20.0 Tons 68 NIA 4484 7 9.80 '9.80 Low NIA Vance Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons 38 NIA Corn, Silage 15.7 Tons 53 NIA 4490 17 4.20 4.20 Low N/A Vance Fescue Hay 4.3 Tons 68 NIA 4490 18(N1) 5.44 0.60 Medium NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 5 NIA 4490 18(N2) 5.44 0.60 Medium N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 5 NIA 4490 1 18(N3) 5.441 0.60 Medium NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 5 NIA 4490 18(N4) 5.44 0.60 Medium NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 5 NIA 4490 18(N5) 5.44 0.60 Low NIA Vance Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 6 NIA 4490 18(N6) 5.44 0.60 Low NIA Vance Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 6 NIA 4490 18(N7) 5.44 0.60 Low NIA Vance Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 6 NIA 4490 18(N8) 5.44 0.60 Low NIA Vance Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 6 NIA 4490 18(N9) 5.44 0.60 Low NIA Vance Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 6 NIA 4490 20(SI) 3.08 0.621 Medium NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 6 NIA 4490 20(S2) 3.08 0.62 Medium NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 6 NIA 4490 20(S3) 3.08 0.62 Medium NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 6 N/A 4490 20(S4) 3.08 0.62 Medium NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 6 NIA 4490 20(S5) 3.08 0.62 Medium NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 6 NIA 4564 1 3.60 3.60 Low NIA Apeling Small Grain, Silage 9.2 Tons 50 NIA Com, Silage 20.0 Tons 68 NIA 4564 2 4.01 4,00 Medium NIA Helena Small Grain, Silage 7.4 Tons 40 NIA Corn, Silage 13.9 Tons 47 NIA 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 1/16/2009 PCs Page Page l of 3 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. Planned Crops Summary Tract Field Total Acres Useable Acres Plat Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE P205 Removal (lbstacre) Applied (lbsracre) 4564 5 16.20 16.20 Medium NIA Helena Small Grain, Silage 7.4 Tons 40 NIA Com, Silage 13.9 Tons 47 NIA 4564 6 32.80 32.80 Low NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3,2 Tons 5 N/A 4565 1 16.10 16.10 Low NIA Appling Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8 NIA 4565 2 13.9 13-901 Low NIA Cecil Small Grain, Silage 8.8 Tons 48 N/A Cam, Silage 18.4 Tons 63 NIA 4565 3 4.6 4.60 Low NIA Cecil Small Grain, Silage 8.8 Tons 48 NIA Com, Silage 18.4 Tons 63 NIA 4565 4 4.00 4.00 Low NIA Cecil Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons 52 NIA Corn, Silage 20.0 Tons 68 NIA 4565 5 6.10 6.10 Low NIA Helena Small Grain, Silage 6.8 Tons 37 NIA Corn, Silage 12.8 Tons 44 NIA 4565 6 4.00 4.00 Medium NIA Helena Small Grain, Silage 6.8 Tons 37 N/A Corn, Silage 12.8 Tons 44 NIA 4583 3 13.10 13.10 Low NIA Vance Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tans 7 N/A 4583 4 9.70 9.70 Low NIA Appling Small Grain, Silage 9.2 Tons 50 NIA Com, Silage 20.0 Tons 68 NIA 4583 5 5,20 3.20 Medium N/A Mecklenburg Small Grain, Silage 7.8 Tons 42 NIA Com, Silage 16.5 Tons 56 NIA PLAN TOTALS: 236.06 180.22 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 1/16/2008 PCs Page Page 2 of 3 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. j Iviij. ... 1: q �t'ljlvi ei�A- nr 'e C W, q.,n iNj 11, "IiIII!I!IjI-41-II,":I'I t� Fij �1117J nce 'k TI:i :1.11"., ore . !nZ 'Ui �j 1,7�il q: 'IJ mad . .. ... .. . .... y Low potential to contribute to soluble None <2 nutrient leaching below the root zone. Moderate potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. >= 2 & nutrient leaching below the root zone. <= 10 High potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils nutrient leaching below the root zone. available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples > 10 are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long-TerinNo-Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393)and Riparian Forest Buffers (391). j. 1. 'A � . i , i PLAP ji," 11 1 !IIIIII? '.. I �T I : � . . .. .. . . . . .�rlr !i 1 qIdnagernent ji !ii j ecomrnen a tonf, dj';;:41 IIijjQj i lojii ]�.'�jli !4! f W., I I- ;r - - .. r"" '� 4— 11"v id E, �il �J 0-25 Low No adjustment needed; N based application 25-50 Medium No adjustment needed; N based application 51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal > 100 Very High Starter P application only 230981 Database Version 33 Date Printed 1/16/2008 PCIS Page Page 3 of 3 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data, The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake. This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the.pian adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation. Waste.Utilization Table Year 1 Tract Field source ID Soil Series Total Acres Use, Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd (lbs/A) Comm. Fert. Nutrient Applied (lbs/A) Res. (lbs/A) Applic. Method Manure PA NutrientA pplied (lbs/A) Liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 4484 2 U9 Vance 5.60 5.60 Orchardgrass Hay 2.9 Tons 911-7131 129 0 0 Broad. 129 0.00 30.00 0.00 168.00 4484 3 U9 Vance 4.()0 4.00 Small Grain, Silage 6.4 Tons 911-3/31 71 0 0 Broad. 71 0A0 16.51 0.00 66.05 4484 3 U9 Vance 4.00 4.00 Com, Silage 14.4 Ton 2/15-6/30 157 0 0 Incor. 157 0.00 27.54 0.00 110.17 4484 4 U9 Vance 6.60 6.60 Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 78 0 0 Broad. 78 0.00 18.14 0.00 119.72 4484 4 U9 Vance 6.60 6.60 Com, Silage 15.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 171 0 0 Incor. 171 O.DO 30.001 0.00 198.00 4484 5 U9 Cecil 8.20 8.20 Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 107 0 0 Broad. 107 0.00 24.88 0.00 204.04 4484 5 U9 Cecil 8.20 8.20 Corn, Silage 20.0 Ton 2/15-6/30 218 0 0 Incor. 218 0.00 38.25 0.00 313.61 4484 7 U9 Vance 9.80 9.80 Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 78 0 0 Broad. 78 0.00 18.14 0.00 177.76 4484 7 U9 Vance 9.80 9.80 Com, Silage 15.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 171 0 0 Incor. 171 OAO 30.00 0.00 294.b 4490 17 U9 Vance 4.20 410 Fescue Hay 4.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 191 0 0 Broad. 191 0.00 44.42 0.00 186.56 4490 IS(NI) U6 Helena 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 104 0 0 Irrig. 104 41.20 0.00 24.90 0.00 4490 18(N2) U6 Helena 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 811-7131 104 0 0 Irrig. 104 41.20 0.00 24.90 0.00 4490 1 "3) U6 Helena 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 104 0 0 Irrig. 104 41.20 0.00 24,90 0.00 4490 18(W) U6 Helena 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 104 0 0 Irrig. 104 41.20 OM 24.90 0.00 4490 18(N5) U6 Vance 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 811-7131 120 0 0 Irrig. 120 47.54 0.00 28.73 0.00 4490 18(N6) U6 Vance 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 811-7/31 ]20 0 0 Irrig. 120 47.54 0.00 28.73 0.00 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed. 1/16/2008 WUT Page Page 1 of 3 0 0 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Tract Field Source ID 4490 18(N7) U6 4490 18(N8) U6 4490 18(N9) U6 4490 20(SI) U6 4490 20(S2) U6 Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres T 5,441.0,60 Fescue Pasture :e 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture z 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture na 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture na 3.081 0.62 Fescue Pasture Crop Nitrogen Comm. Res, Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid PA FeM (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field) Obs/A) (lbs/A) (1bs/A) Applic. Applic. 1000 RyF Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.04 0 3.6 Tons 8/1-7/31 120 0 0 brig. 120 4T54 0.00 28.73 3.6 Tons 8/1-7131 120 0 0 Irrig. 120 47.54 0.00 28.73 3.6 Tons 8/1-7/31 120 0 0 Irrig. 120 47.54 0.00 28.73 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 Irrig. 114 45,16 0.00 27.83 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 Irrig. 114 45.16 0.00 27.83 4490 20(S3) U6 Helena 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 9/1-7/31 114 0 0 [Trig. 114 45,16 0.00 27.83 0.00 4490 20(S4) U6 Helena 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 Irrig. 114 45.16 0.00 27.83 0.00 4490 20(S5) U6 Helena 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 811-7131 114 0 0 Irrig. 114 45.16 0.00 27.83 0.00 4564 1 U9 jAppling 3.60 3.60 Small Grain, Silage 9.2 Tons 911-3/31 102 0 ❑ Broad. 102 0.00 23.7 0.00 85.39 4564 1 U9 Appling 3.60 3.60 Corn, Silage 20.0 Ton 2115-6130 218 1 0 0 Incor. 218 0.00 38,25 0.00 137.68 4564 2 U9 Helena 4,00 4,00 Small Grain, Silage 7.4 Tons 911-3/31 80 0 0 Broad. 80 0.00 18.60 0.00 74.42 4564 2 U9 Helena 4.00 4,00 Corn, Silage 13.9 Ton 2/15-6130 149 0 0 Incor. 149 0.00 26.14 0.00 104,56 4564 5 U9 IHelena 16.20 16.20 Snail Grain, Silage 7A Tons 9/1-3/31 80 0 0 1 Broad. 80 0.00 18,601 0.00 301.39 4564 5 U9 Helena 16.20 16.20 Com, Silage 13.9 Ton 2115-6/30 149 0 Q 1 Incor. 149 0.00 26.14 0.00 423.47 4564 6 1 U9 Helena 32.80 32.80 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 811-7/31 104 1 0 0 1 Broad. 104 0.00 24.19 0.00 793.2 4565 1 U9 Appling 16.10 16.10 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 811-7131 160 0 0 Broad. 160 0.00 37.21 0.00 599.06 4565 2 U9 Cecil 13.90 13.90 Small Grain, Silage 8.8 Tons 9/1-3131 98 0 0 Broad. 98 0.00 22.79 0.00 316.79 4565 2 U9 Cecil 13.90 13.90 Corn, Silage 18.4 Ton 2/15-6/30 201 0 0 Incor. 201 0.001 35.26 0.001 490.15 4565 3 U9 Cecil 4.60 4.60 Small Grain, Silage 8.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 98 0 0 Broad. 98 0.00 22.79 0.00 104.84 4565 3 U9 Cecil 4.60 4.60 Corn, Silage 18.4 Ton 2/15-6/30 201 0 0 Incor. 201 0.00 35.26 0,00 162.21 4565 4 U9 Cecil 4.00 4.00 Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3131 107 0 0 Broad, 107 0.00 24.89 0.00 99.53 4565 4 U9 Cecil 4.00 4.00 Com, Silage 0.0 Ton 2/15-6130 1 218 0 0 Incor. 218 0.00 38.25 0.00 152.98 230981 " Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 WUT Page Page 2 of 3 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Tract Field Source M Soil Series Total Acres Use, Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd (1bs1A) Comm. Fort Nutrient Applied (IbsJA) Res, (lbslA) Applic. Method Manure PA NutrienIA pplied (lbsJA) Liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N N N N 1000 gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 4565 5 U9 Helena 6.10 6.10 Small Grain, Silage 6.9 Tons 911-3I31 73 0 0 Broad. 73 0.00 16.98 0.00 103.56 4565 5 U9 Helena 6.10 6.10 Corn, Silage 12.8 Ton 2/15-6/30 137 0 0 Incor. 137 0,00 24.03 0.00 146.61 4565 6 U9 Helena 4.00 4.00 Small Grain, Silage 6.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 73 0 0 Broad. 73 0.00 16.98 0.00 67.91 4565 6 U9 Helena 4.00 4.00 Corn, Silage 12.8 Ton 2115-6/30 137 0 0 Incor. 137 0.00 24.03 0.00 96.14 4583 3 U9 Vance 13A0 13.10 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7131 137 0 0 Broad. 137 0.00 31.86 0.00 417.3, 4583 4 U9 Appling 9.70 9.70 Small Grain, Silage 9.2 Tons 911-3/31 102 0 0 Broad. 102 0.00 23.72 0.001 230.09 4583 4 U9 Appling 9.70 9.70 Corn, Silage 0.0 Ton 2/15-6130 218 0 0 Incor. 218 0.00 38.25 0.00 370.98 4583 5 U9 Mecklenburg 5.20 5.20 Small Grain, Silage 7.8 Tons 9/1-3131 87 0 0 Broad. 87 0.00 20.23 0.00 105.21 4583 5 U9 Mecklenburg 5.20 5.20 Corn, Silage 16.5 Ton 2/15-6/30 180 0 0 Incor. 180 0,001 31.58 0.00 164.21 Total Applied, 1000 gallons 382.37 Total Produced, 1000 gallons 343.25 n= � Sri Balance, 1000 gallons -39.12 t;- - Total Applied, tons 7,385.75 Total Produced, tons 4,200.00 Balance, tons • -3.185.75 Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data_ 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 WUT Page Page 3 of 3 C-] 0 0. 0 The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application event. Irrigation Application Factors Tract Field Soil Series Application Rate (inches our) Application Amount (inches) 4490 18(N1) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 18(N2) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 18(N3) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 18(N4) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 18(N5) Vance 0.35 1.0 4490 18(N6) Vance 0.35 1.0 4490 18(N7) Vance 0.35 1.0 4490 18(N8) Vance 0.35 1.0 4490 18(N9) Vance 0.35 1.0 4490 20(S1) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 20(S2) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 20(S3) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 20(S4) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 20(S5) Helena 0.20 1.0 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 1/]6/2008 IAF Page Page 1 of 1 The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified. The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen. Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 0 N (lbs/A) P2O5 (lbs/A) K2O (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn I (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract 1 Field 4484 3 Req'd Nutrients 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres I App. Period 4.00 4/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 6.4 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 35 1bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 -1 Tract Field 4484 4 Req'd Nutrients 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App. Period 6.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: � ' ,a r ,, i 1XIM.. . 11410911 <, CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 7.0 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 38 ]be/ac. Low BALANCE 01 0 0 0 a 01 0 -1 Tract Field 4484 5 Req'd Nutrients 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App. Period 8.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: INMIIDIOM't NW, 93010 WIN CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 9.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 52 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 Tract Field 4484 7 Req'd Nutrients 78 90 60 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App. Period 9.80 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: MWa a � - N110 lion n . . � CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYC Sample Date 7.0 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 38 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 90 -60 0 0 0 0 -1 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 NMR Page Page 1 of 10 0. 0 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 0 N (lbsIA) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract F Field 4564 1 Req'd Nutrients 102 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 Acres App. Period 3,60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: Vx'2:2 0 �q'� 'M CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sample Date 9.2 Tons 04.17-07 Manure 102 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 50 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JRYE Traci I Field 4564 2 Req'd Nutrients 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AApp. ' Period 4.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 7.4 Tons 04-17-07 Manure so 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 P Remov I I Rating 40 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Tract I Field 4564 5 Req'd Nutrients 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 16.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: $00 mwd'� %no RON NAM, M'"W IN" no" CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYEJ Sample Date 7.4 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 80 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 40 lbs/ac, Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4565 2 Req'd Nutrients 98 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Acres I App. Period 13.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: WWOM MM affm WM gnu WM WWI CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYEJ Sample Date 8.8 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 98 0 0 ol 0 0 01 0 P Removal I Rating 48 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Tract I Field 4565 3 Req'd Nutrients 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres] App. Period 4,60 911-3/31 Supplied By: MW W= am sm LIM W&W "M offi'm CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYEJ Sample Date 9.8 Tons 1 04-17-07 Manure 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 48 lbs/ac. ILow I BALANCE 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 230981 Database Version 3.1 DatePtinted: 1116/2008 NM R Page Page 2 of 10 Nutrient Management Recommendations 'Pest YEAR 0 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4565 4 Rcq'd Nutrients 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App. Period 4.00 911-3131 Su lied B pP Yndi,k E i' t ° 4 t' :t.. P �a' t�l: ",E,�.€ !i 'lu i b ..1,' e. k. .;!!t.?� eii 4t� da t€; .. rt"• CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 9.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 52 lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 Tract Field 4565 5 Req'd Nutrients 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App. Period 6,10 911-3131 Supplied By; S `� 1 �' .< s �' Min 4`� �, CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mple Date 6.8 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E l Rating 37-lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 Field 4565 6 Req'd Nutrients 73 0 00 0 0 0 1 pp. Period 4,00 9l1-3131 Supplied By: ,, s 1 R . � 'Iffi m l ( CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 .01 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 6.8Tons 04-17-07 Manure 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRemoval Rating 371bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 Tract Field 4583 4 Req'd Nutrients 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 9.70 9/1-3131 Supplied By: Lug' ' AM PAM CROP Small Grain, Silage starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 9.2 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 102 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 50 lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4583 5 Req'd Nutrients 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 5.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:` loom a am. us CROP I Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 7.8 Tons 04-17-07 1 Manure 87 0 0 0 0 01 01 0 P Removal Rating f 42 lbs/ac.(Medium BALANCE 0 OLD 1 0 0 0 of 0 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 NMR Page Page 3 of 10 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4484 2 Req'd Nutrients 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App. Period 5.60 811-7131 SuppliedBy: r3i`E�li..l,': t a. i e!Ii�:° '1 8 i .$�.9e,net• 7a[`_.,er�x !]E.if:e tYf `. .R. ?= IF l i CROP Orchardgrass Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 2.9 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 129 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 P Removal Rating 42 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 Tract Field 4484 3 Req'd Nutrients 157 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: f " >}' 11 NUM _ P 1, ' CROP Com, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 14.4 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 157 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 49 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4484 4 Req'd Nutrients 171 0 40 0 0 a 0 a Acres App. Period 6.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: a CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 15.7 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 171 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 53 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 -40 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4484 5 Req'd Nutrients 218 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 8.20 2115 6/30 Supplied By:W ; CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 1 20.0Tons 04-17-07 Manure 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 68 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 -10 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4484 7 Req'd Nutrients 171 100 110 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 9.80 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 15.7Tons 04-17-07 Manure 171 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 53 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 1 0 -100 -1 10 0 0 0 0 0 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 NMR Page Page 4 of 10 0 0 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract I Field 4490 17 Req'd Nutrients 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres TApp. Period 4.20 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.3 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 1911 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 P Removal I Rating 68 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 Tract I Field 7 4490 18(N1) Req'd Nutrients 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 0,6() 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: 11101 MWIS, WIN a" ®r, ' M, MW 2M 193M CROP Fescue Pasture . Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 3.2 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 5 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4490 1 8(N2) Req'd Nutrients 104 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 AueTApp. Period 0.60 811-7131 Supplied By: '"m Im"I AN! W.WE ~R m. two OWN Wim CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 01 11 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 3.2 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 104 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 5 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4490 18(N3) Req'd Nutrients 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 0.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: svw -4 on, Sam W"M law CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 3.2 Tons 1 04-17.07 Manure 104 0 0 0 ()1 0 0 0 P ro-v I Rating 5 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 RRemoval Tract I Field 4490 1"4) Req'dNutrients 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 App. Period 0.60 811-7/31 Supplied By: "Ii 3 NOW CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date: 3.2 Tons 1 04-17-07 Manure t04 0 0 0 0 0 0 ol P Removal Rating 5 lbslac. edium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1116/2008 NMR Page Page 5 of 10 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4490 18(N5) Req'd Nutrients 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.6D 811-7131 Supplied By:1sial?t tE iE.<u dE l; $> iqi§fl�-� itd3 a. $l: fin$ . °'f t 3` E�ti;;�lt ti 44 a 9;#1a=i?r tf::i.,s g�0 CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 RYE Sample Date 3.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 120 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 P Removal Rating' ' 6 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4490 18(N6) Req'd Nutrients 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: g ( em CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 3.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 6 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 D 0 0 01 0 Tract Field 4490 18(N7) Req'd Nutrients 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: xM Im- I s' ` JH�.Ilm A , ' CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mple Date ' 3.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j l Rating 6 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Field 4490 18(N8) Req'd Nutrients 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pp. Period 0.60 8l1-7/31 Supplied By: " • LAW i$ CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 3.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 120 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 P Removal Rating 6 Ibslac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4490 1 "9) Req'd Nutrients 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.60 9/1-7/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 3.6 Tons 04-17-07 1 Manure 120 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 6 lbslac. Law BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 NMR. Page Page 6 of 10 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4490 20(91) Req'd Nutrients 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A,,,T,App. Period 0.62 8/t-7/31 Supplied By, Mv 1% �wk il!"113 �'-j P '0 14 4'A 46W - 471,5r I CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 3.5 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 114 01 0 0 0 0 0 01 P Removal Rating 6 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4490 20(S2) Req'd Nutrients 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.62 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: 79"o—M �Wwg MOS, am k"M AN 11111' W 69"IMMI; CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 3,5 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 6 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract I Field 4490 20(S3) Req'd Nutrients 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 0.62 8/1-7131 Supplied By: w= M N a - '-M - 0= IS —; w 10OW CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYERYE Sample 'a' Date 3.5 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 6 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract I Field 4490 20(S4) Req'd Nutrients 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 App. Period 0.62 8/1-7/31 Supplied 13y: a" on, W WIM WRIM mum No, CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 3.5 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 114 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 6 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 Traci I— Field 4490 20(S5) Req'd Nutrients 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 0.62 8/1-7/3 1 Supplied By: mm MW 1.00 Um W" 0"1 Sym CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYEJ Sample Date 3.5 Tons 1 04-17-E] Manure 1141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 6 lbs/2C. Medium I BALANCE 0 01 01 01 0 01 01 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/1612008 NMR Page Page 7 of 10 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR -F 1 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (Ibs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Ca (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4564 1 Req'd Nutrients 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PeriodAcres App. 3.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Soil Series Appling Residual G 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Sample Sample Date ' D 20.0 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 P Removal Rating 68 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract EAppRYE Field F 4564 2 Req'd Nutrients 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Per'., . Period 4.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: Z CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 ol 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 13.9 Tons 1 04-17-07 Manure 149 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 P R P Removal I Rating 47 lbs/ac. IMedium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 Tract T Tract I Field 4564 5— Req'd Nutrients 149 0 0 goo 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period16.20 2/15-6130 Supplied By: CROP Cum, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 RYEI Sample Date 13.9 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 149 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Traci I Field 4564 6 Req'd Nutrients 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App, Period 32,80 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: MUM WWO mut NEW CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE RYE Sample Datc 3.2Tons 1 04-17-07 Manure 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Rating 5 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Tract I Field 4565 Req'd Nutrients 1601 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 16.10 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: WMIMM W.W. hWAM Om 0M. mum now CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 RYEI Sample Date 4.8 Tons ILaw 04-17-07 Manurel 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 1 8 lbs/ac. I BALANCE 1 01- - 0 A 01 0 0 OL- 01 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 NMR Page Page 8 of 10 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N (lbs/A) P2O5 (lbs/A) K2O (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4565 2 Req'd Nutrients 201 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 13.90 2/15-6I30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage - Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 18A Tons 04-17-07 Manure 201 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 P Removal IRating 63 ibslac. Low BALANCE 0 0 -10 0 0 0 0 0 Tract IField 4565 3 Req'd Nutrients 201 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: �'! NIXr F W.T. CROP Care, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mple Date 18.4 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l Rating 63 lbs/aa Low BALANCE 0 0 .10 0 0 0 0 0 F Field 4565 4 Req'd Nutrients 218 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 pp. Period 4.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: 2'. ; OT" � v , -, :�`�.. "affm CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 20.0 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 68 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 01 0 -10 0 0 0 0 0 Tract I Field 4565 5 Req'd Nutrients 137 0 aim 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 6.10 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: ! ' a' ?i. 's ' ate h ,E. ,vy CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 12.8 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 44 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE D 0 -10 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4565 6 Req'd Nutrients 137 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.00 2115-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 12.8 Tons - 04-17-07 Manure 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 44 Ibs/ac. edium BALANCE 0 0 -10 0 0 0 0 0 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 NM Page Page 9 of 10 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (ibs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4583 3 Req'd Nutrients 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 13.10 8/1-7131 Supplied By: ii .. 414 i "1140 �l; "�i �� "i, �8� ill � t i"",A Al,� E3�: ��, � CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ample Date 4.1 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rating 7 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ER..-.val Field 4583 4 Req'd Nutrients 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 App. Period 9.70 2115.6130 Supplied By: n ' ,a UWA m 'I N CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 20.0 Tans 04-17-07 Manure 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 68 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 Tract Field 4583 5 Req'd Nutrients 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App, Period 5.20 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: ''` ' - ME y g .< < 1I CROp Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ample Date LP9 16.5 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vall I Rating 56 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE I 0 01 0 .01 0 0 0 0 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 NMR Page Page 10 of 10 The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbslacre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal. In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production . Required Soil Test Values Tract Field Crop PH Lime Recom. (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 4484 2 Orchardgrass Hay 5.3 1.0 70 None 259 None 4484 3 Small Grain, Silage 5.3 1.0 70 None 259 None 4484 3 Corn, Silage 5.3 0.0 70 None 259 None 4484 4 Small Grain, Silage 5.3 1.0 70 None 259 None 4484 4 Cam, Silage 5.3 0.0 70 None 259 None 4484 5 Small Grain, Silage 5.5 0.8 76 None 244 None 4484 5 Corn, Silage 5.5 0.0 76 None 244 None 4484 7 Small Grain, Silage 5-6 0.6 62 None 120 None 4484 7 Com, Silage 5.6 0.0 62 None 120 None 4490 17 Fescue Hay 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 18(NI) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 1"2) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 18(N3) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 18(N4) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 18(N5) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 18(N6) Fescue Pasture 63 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 18(N7) Fescue Pasture 63 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 18(N8) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 18(N9) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 20(Si) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 20(S2) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 20(S3) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 1 20(S4) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None • • ---------------------------------------- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------._...--------------------- ---- S g- -------- 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 STV Page -Pa e 1 of 2 Required Soil Test Values Tract Field Crop pH Lime Recom. (tonslacre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 4490 20(S5) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4564 1 Small Grain, Silage 6.3 0.0 136 None 573 None 4564 1 1 Corn, Silage 6.3 0.0 136 None 573 None 4564 2 Small Grain, Silage 6.1 0.0 103 None 415 None 4564 2 Com, Silage 6.1 0.0 103 None 415 None 4564 5 Small Grain, Silage 6.1 0.0 105 None 497 None 4564 5 Corn, Silage 6.1 0.0 105 None 497 None 4564 6 Fescue Pasture 6.1 0.0 105 None 497 None 4565 1 Fescue Pasture 5.9 0.0 78 None 325 None 4565 2 Small Grain, Silage 5.9 0.0 - 78 None 325 None 4565 2 Corn, Silage 5.9 0.0 78 None 325 None 4565 3 Small Grain, Silage 5.7 0.5 62 None 297 None 4565 3 Com, Silage 5.7 0.0 62 None 297 None 4565 4 Small Grain, Silage 5.7 0.5 62 None 297 None 4565 4 Com, Silage 5.7 0.0 62 None 297 None 4565 5 Small Grain, Silage 5.7 0.5 62 None 297 None 4565 5 Com, Silage 5.7 0.0 62 None 297 None 4565 6 Small Grain, Silage 5.7 0.5 62 None 297 None 4565 6 Cam, Silage 5.7 0.0 62 None 297 None 4583 3 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 127 None 747 None 4583 4 Small Grain, Silage 6.5 0.0 127 None 747 None 4583 4 Com, Silage 6.5 0.0 127 None 747 None 4583 5 Small Grain, Silage 6.3 0.0 102 None 442 None 4583 5 Com, Silage 1 6.3 0.0 102. None 442 None -------------------- --------------•----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 STV Page Page 2 of 2 • 11 • • The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero. Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity. Available Waste Storage Capacity Source Name Williams Dairy (Liquid Onl Design Storage Capacity (Days) Start Date 9/1 180 Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity (Days) 1 1 149 1 2 141 1 3 171 1 4 180 1 5 180 1 6 180 1 7 149 1 8 118 i 9 149 1 10 179 I 11 180 1 12 149 * Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month. ------------------------�------------------------•---------------------- ------- -----....---------- 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 CapacityPage Page 1 of 1 • • Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is prohibited. 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips). 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance). 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ' 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 Specification Page i 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the soil surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. 10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters. 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. ----- --- --------- — ----------------------------- ----------- ------------------------------ 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 Specification Page 2 17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be.established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge. 18. .If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. ...... ---- -.. ------ -------------------------------- - -.---------------.... 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 Specification Page 3 • • Crop Notes The following crop note applies to field(s): 18(N1), 18(N2), 18(N3), 18(N4), 20(S1), 20(S2), 20(S3), 20(S4), 20(S5), 6 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance time, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 18(N5), 18(N6), 18(N7), 18(N8), 18(N9), 3 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. - --------- • ---- --------------------------------------• ....................... •- --------- 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 5 The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 5, 6 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 314 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 5 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 1201bs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. ••-•----.......I-------------------------------------- --- -------------------------------------------------------...- Page Page 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 CropNote Pa a Page 2 of 5 The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized .when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 17 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lblac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 2001b/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. I to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- 230961 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 5 • The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 5, 6 Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 112" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 5 Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in•the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 121bs. N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------- 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 Crop Note Page Page 4 of 5 The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristies needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 2 Orchardgrass: No Comment 230981 Database Version 3.1 bate Printed: 01-16-2008 Crop Note Page Page 5 of 5 Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices Farmstead • Dairy Production Vegetative or wooded buffers; id Recommended best management practices; Good judgement and common sense Paved lots or bam alley • Wet manure -covered surfaces Scrape or flush daily; surfaces Promote drying with proper ventilation; f( Routine checks and maintenance on waterers, hydrants, pipes, stock tanks Bedded areas • Urine; C;( Promote drying with proper ventilation; • Partial microbial decomposition �( Replace wet or manure -covered bedding Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial decomposition Provide liquid drainage for stored manure Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Bottom or mid -level loading; surface • Mixing while filling; ❑ Tank covers; • Agitation while emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids; ❑ Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions; ❑ Agitate only prior to manure removal; ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants Settling basin surfaces • Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Liquid drainage from settled solids; • Mixing while filling; ❑ Remove solids regularly • Agitation while emptying Manure, slurry, or sludge • Agitation when spreading; ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges; . spreader outlets • Volatile gas emissions d Wash residual manure from spreader after use; O Proven biological additives or oxidants Uncovered manure, slurry • Volatile gas emissions while drying ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges; or sludge on field surfaces Rf Soil incorporation within 48 hrs; laJ Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying; ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon liquid ❑ Flush tank covers; while tanks are filling ❑ Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with anti -siphon vents Outside drain collection or • Agitation during wastewater Box covers junction boxes conveyance AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page Source Cause BMPs. to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank filling ❑ Sump tank covers and drawdown End of drainpipes at lagoon • Agitation daring wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath conveyance lagoon liquid level Lagoon surfaces • Volitile gas emission; ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity; 0 Biological mixing; Cl. Correct lagoon startup procedures; • Agitation a Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio; 16 Minimum agitation when pumping; AMechanical aeration; ❑ Proven bioloeical additives Irrigation sprinkler nozzles • 'High pressure agitation; Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind; • Wind drift Minimum recommended operating pressure; Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface; D Pump from second stage lagoon; lh Flush residual manure from pipes at end of slurry/sludge pumpings Dead animals • Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses Standing water around • Improper drainage; fl Grade and landscape such that water drains away facilities • Microbial decomposition of organic from facilities matter 1 Mud tracked onto public • Poorly maintained access roads ® Farm access road maintenance roads from farm access 0 Additional Information: Available From: Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System - Lake Wheeler Road Filed Labatory ; EBAE 209-95 NCSU -BAE Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU - BAE Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83 NCSU - BAE Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU - BAE Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PROI07, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 2 Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations Source Cause - BMPs to Minimize insects Site Specific Practices Liquid Systems Flush Gutters • Accumulation of Solids rd Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from gutters as designed; L ] Remove bridging of accumulated solids at discharge Lagoons and Pits • Crusted Solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting of . solids to a depth of no more than 6 - 8 inches over more than 30% of surface. Excessive Vegetative r Decaying vegetation 1A Maintain vegetative control along banks of lagoons Growth and other impoundments to prevent accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter. Dry Systems --- •- _ -.. Feeders • Feed Spillage Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g", bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation of decaying wastage. Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10 day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during Feed Storage • Accumulation of feed residues M Reduce moisture accumulation within and around immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by insuring drainage away from site and/or providing adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain products). Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed" Animal Bolding Areas • Accumulations of animal wastes. 1J Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences and feed wastage AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page 1 and other locations where waste accumulates and disturbance by animals is minimal. Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes (i.e. inspect for and remove or break up accumulated solids as needed. • Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Insects Site Specific Practices Dry Manure Handling • Accumulations of animal wastes Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7-10 day Systems interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during winter) where manure is loaded for land application or disposal. Provide fo adequate drainage around manure stockpiles. 1Li Inspect for an remove or break up accumulated wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure handling areas as needed. For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613 AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page 2 • • Mortality Management Methods (check which method(s) are being implemented) ❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water. I( Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7. ❑ Complete incineration ❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the Department of Agriculture. ❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached) December 18, 1996 None Randolph County, North Carolina [Yields are those that can be expected under a high level of management. They are for nonirrigated areas. Absence of a yield indicates that the soil is not suited to the crop or the crop generally is not grown on the soil] Map symbol Land Corn silage Oats Tail fescue Wheat and soil name capability Tons Bu Tons Su ApB: Appling 2e 24.50 108 5.40 64 Cce: Cecil 2e 22.00 98 4,80 57 Ccc; - Cecil 3e 18.40 82 4.00 48 CeB2: Cecil, moderately eroded 2e 20.00 88 4.30 52 ChA: Chewacla 4w 28.00 110 4.50 65 Wehadkee, undrained ew --- --- -- — HeB: Helena 2e 16.00 83 3.90 49 Worsham; undrained 5w -- --- --- -- HeC: Helena 3e 14.70 78 3.70 46 Mac: Mecklenburg 3e 15.20 68 3.60 40 VaB: Vance 2e 17.00 81 4,30 48 Vac: Vance 3e 16.10 76 4.00 45 USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 1 0 1 0 Prime and Other Important Farmlands Randolph County, North Carolina Map Map unit name I Farmland classification L symbol ApB Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes All areas are prime farmland CcB Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes All areas are prime farmland CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded All areas are prime farmland HeB Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes All areas are prime farmland VaB Vance sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes All areas are prime farmland CcC Cecil sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Farmland of statewide importance HeC Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes Farmland of statewide importance MaC Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Farmland of statewide importance Vac Vance sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Farmland of statewide importance ChA Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded Prime farmland if drained and either protected from Flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 15 Conservation Service Survey Area Version pate: 05/08/2007 Page 1 Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) Randolph County, North Carolina [Minor map unit components are excluded from this report] Map unit: ApB - Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Component: Appling (83%) The Appling component makes up 83 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 6 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about l percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: CcB - Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Component: Cecil (85%) The Cecil component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72. inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: CcC - Cecil sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Component: Cecil (85%) The Cecil component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about l percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: CeB2 - Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded Component: Cecil, moderately eroded (85%) The Cecil, moderately eroded component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. it is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 9 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. USDA Natural Resources Surrey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 1 0 • Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) Randolph County, North Carolina Map unit: ChA - Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded Component: Chewacla (85%) The Chewacla component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. This component is on flood plains, valleys. The parent material consists of loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is frequently flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 15 inches during January, February, March, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: HeS - Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Component: Helena (90%) The Helena component makes up 90 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 6 percent. This component is on ridges, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 24 inches during January, February, March, April, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 9 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: HeC - Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes Component: Helena (75%) The Helena component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 6 to 90 percent. This component is on hillslopes on ridges, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of ' water saturation is at 24 inches during January, February, March, April, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: MaC - Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Component: Mecklenburg (85%) The Mecklenburg component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on hillslopes on ridges, uplands. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase and/or gneiss. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 9 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 18 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 2 • 0 Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) Randolph County, North Carolina Map unit: VaB - Vance sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Component: Vance (85%) The Vance component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: VaC - Vance sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Component: Vance (85%) The Vance component makes up 65 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on hillslopes on ridges, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss andlor schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 3 • • Map Unit Description (Brief) Randolph County, North Carolina [Only those map units that have entries for the selected description categories are included in this report] Map unit: Ap13 - Appling sandy loam, 2 to,6 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Well suited Management concerns: Erodibility and soil fertility Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity Map unit: Cc13 - Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Well suited Management concerns: Soil fertility and erodibility Management measures and considerations - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity Map unit: CcC - Cecil sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Pasture -well suited; hayland-suited Management concerns: Erodibility, equipment use, and soil fertility Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - The slope may limit the use of equipment in the steeper areas during the harvest of hay crops - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture USA Natural Resources Survey Area Version; 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01107l2008 Page 1 • • Map Unit Description (Brief) Randolph County, North Carolina Map unit: CeB2 - Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Well suited Management concerns: Erodibility and soil fertility Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity Map unit: ChA - Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Poorly suited Management concerns: Flooding and wetness Managemenfineasures and considerations - Harvesting hay crops as soon as possible helps to reduce the risk of damage from flooding - Flooding may be a hazard for livestock - Preventing overgrazing or preventing grazing when the soil is too wet helps to prevent soil compaction, decreased productivity, and a rough soil surface Map unit: HeB = Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Well suited Management concerns: Erodibility, soil fertility, and wetness Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture - Preventing overgrazing or preventing grazing when the soil is too wet helps to prevent soil compaction, decreased productivity, and a rough soil surface USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 2 i • Map Unit Description (Brief) Randolph County, North Carolina Map unit: HeC. - Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Well suited Management concerns: Erodibility, soil fertility, and wetness Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity - Preventing overgrazing or preventing grazing when the soil is too wet helps to prevent soil compaction, decreased productivity, and a rough soil surface Map unit: MaC - Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Pasture -well suited; hayland-suited Management concerns: Erodibility, equipment use, and soil fertility Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - The slope may limit the use of equipment in the steeper areas during the harvest of hay crops - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity Map unit: VaB - Vance sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Well suited Management concerns: Erodibility and soil fertility Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 3 • M Map Unit Description (Brief) Randolph County, North Carolina Map unit: VaC - Vance sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Pasture -well suited, hayland-suited Management concerns: Erodibility, equipment use, and soil fertility Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - The slope may limit the use of equipment in the steeper areas during the harvest of hay crops - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity. - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture USA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 4 Agricultural Disposal of Wastewater by Irrigation and Overland Flow Randolph County, North Carolina [The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the potential limitation. The columns that identify the rating class and limiting features show no more than five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have additional limitations. This report shows only the major soils in each map unit] Map symbol and soil name ApB: Appling CcB: Cecil CcC: Cecil CoB2: Cecil, moderately eroded ChA: Chewacla Pct. of Disposal of wastewater by irrigation Overland flow of wastewater map unit Rating class and Value Rating Gass and FValue limiting features limiting features 83 Somewhat limited Very limited Low adsorption 0.29 Seepage 1.00 Too acid 0.21 Low adsorption 0.29 Too steep for surface 0.08 Too acid 0.21 application 85 Somewhat limited Very limited Low adsorption 0.53 Seepage 1.00 Too steep for surface 0.32 Low adsorption 0.53 application Too acid 0.07 Too acid 0.07 85 Very limited Very limited Too steep for surface 1.00 Seepage 1.00 application Too steep for surface 1.00 . Too steep for 0.78 application sprinkler application Low adsorption 0.53 Low adsorption 0.53 Too acid 0.07 Too acid 0.07 85 Somewhat limited Very limited Too acid 0.77 Seepage 1.00 Low adsorption 0,65 Too acid 0.77 Too steep for surface 0.32 Low adsorption 0.65 application 85 Very limited Very limited Depth to saturated 1.00 Flooding 1.00 zone Depth to saturated 1.00 Flooding 1.00 zone Too acid 0.21 Seepage 1.00 Too acid 0.21 USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 1 Agricultural Disposal of Wastewater by Irrigation and Overland Flow Randolph County, North Carolina Map symbol and soil name Pct. of map unit Disposal of wastewater by irrigation Overland [low of wastewater Rating class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features limiting features HeB: Helena 90 Very limited Very limited Slow water movement 1.00 Seepage 1.00 Depth to saturated 0.99 Depth to saturated 0.99 zone zone Too acid 0.21 Too acid 0.21 Too sleep for surface 0.08 application HeC: Helena 75 Very limited Very limited Slow water movement 1.00 Seepage 1.00 Too steep for surface 1.00 Depth to saturated 0.99 application zone Depth to saturated 0.99 Too steep for surface 0.22 zone application Too acid 0.21 Too ac€d 0.21 Too steep for 0.10 sprinkler application Mac: Mecklenburg 85 Very limited Very limited Too steep for surface 1.00 Seepage 1.00 application Too steep for surface 1.00 Slow water movement 1.00 application Too steep for 0.78 sprinkler application VaB: Vance 85 Very limited Very limited Slow water movement 1.00 Seepage 1.00 Too acid 0.91 Too acid 0.91 Too steep for surface 0.32 application Vac: Vance 85 Very limited Very limited Too steep for surface 1.00 Seepage 1.00 application Too steep for surface 1.00 Slow water movement 1.00 application Too acid 0.91 Too acid 0.91 Too steep for 0.78 sprinkler application USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 COIISETVatIoIl Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 2 0 . 0 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN PHONE NUMBERS DWQ C33 ("-7i EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 11 SWCD ,319- NRCS q_ This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below. A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are: a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam. b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate. c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately. d. Call a pumping contractor. e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon. B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include: a. Immediately stop waste application. b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste. c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff. d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff. e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred. C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include: a. Stop recycle pump. b. Stop irrigation pump. c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge. d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps. D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include: December 18, 1996 6 a. Stop recycle pump. b. Stop irrigation pump. c. Make sure no siphon occurs. d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators. e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps. E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to the lagoon. b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and compact with a clay type soil. c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as possible. 2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages. a. Did the waste reach any surface waters? b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration? c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage? d. Did the spill leave the property? e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters? f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters? g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)? h. How much reached surface waters? 3. Contact appropriate agencies. a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone %'RGY640 After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation. b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number 3,i0/8 67 /) c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department. d. Contact CES, phone number3301UMQlocal SWCD office phone number334-34f 404 and local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number3%-0- yyr17 4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site 2 December 18, 1996 damage. a. Contractors Name: <. " No/der b. Contractors Address: c. Contractors Phone: 6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc. a. Name: 5 hlct n Ko j r ra� b. Phone: / - 6 `i90 - 3 7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with release of wastes from happening again. 3 December 18, 1996 Assisted by: Conservation Plan Map Date: 8/27/2007 NRCS %0e Customer(s): RICHARD WILLIAMS Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Agency: NRCS All Tracts wl Waste Application Fields in CNMP State and County: NC, RANDOLPH Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 189.4 ac. Map Use: Nutrient Management Planning C J Tract 4484 Tract4583 Kings Shelar Trad 4490 Tract5464 l �f �AJ Tract4565 1 inch equals 0.30 miles 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Miles i•P c Assisted by: Conservation Plan Map Date: 8/27/2007 NRCS a ■ Customer(s): RICHARD WILLIAMS Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Agency: NRCS All Tracts wl Waste Application Fields in CNMP State and County: NC, RANDOLPH Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 189.4 ac. Map Use: Nutrient Management Planning 1 inch equals 0.30 miles 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Miles Assisted by: Conservation Plan Map Date: 8/27/2007 NRCS n n Customer(s): RICHARD WILLIAMS Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Agency: NRCS Tract 4484: Fields 2 - 5, 7 State and County: NC, RANDOLPH Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 34.2 ac. Legal Description: Williams Dairy CNMP Map ��, }`� "Sdf� r• N`1" � � j .ev�.#'M�� u� �` !� � h� E" " ' h� �i � �f °yam .� �:`��a -.. 1tiE "_€fE§�!°33 ljf#,� ,fit. �.3 ... � yt�t,ia@;g'I ir' I< L , � ��? I�#�I� �t�� €��j•, i. �� N , v J i ff 4 Y r• e 1 Inch equals 400 feet 200 0 206 400 V R: = � $.:k ��f' {T, � W f )q , h r i vawi ud' 4'� 10 it.#:' i ��, �3 , .;F !F x�.� Iry 1 ('' t p �� 17 i r4`' DU ,.fir b �,I �, I< �: � ,�,, jfkk+i �j � +54 � t r' V I ld �,2•dti a c, x tl jir f � 3 1 i ji , � Its s� � I , � � � � � + j1 �� I � �� ➢� �d`�°+�°;i,'a g ��` s 9 '(�14. r �60 T" r �#>,g M" h € 811�l.idl;l. r v F I,ehl #'� �i1 , a - I ind `„!p fps P �'' ��• . Y, ] ' ' �! I' n -71,t, hl, ti � t 'kid t I p � h Ir . 1pM's pr ,M" I,, I 3 E �" +' �4I lhJ.i °,r � ��-,f.' � J i ��7 ✓g iJ &�,,s� '� +�j '�� '�;�t�'l,;d,�ula!*cr pia. � y�� kk y a,; Consplan Roads Streams Land 11SB ��t�ri: �°+s'f,� ��:P. n�rr r�.�.r.. � ' �• fk g$t �lir�7-,'t`:+i �f��s `�I'�� SCt�ri li w+�,�a Parcel lit - �I !'►�" J' i 'lr r 4 I . 4 t r P• ,� yr Croprat� Forestt Hay w'IRIr#il�e- r,•.y� ! € n '� t }' Pasture " h ;t1Fi s �h rli ,� �C� I Ea • p, �,� ` I l� 1 nn • • Assisted by: Conservation Plan Map Date:8/2712007 NRCS V06el Customer(s): RICHARD WILLIAMS Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Agency: NRCS Tract 4484: Fields 2 - 5, 7 State and County: NC, RANDOLPH Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 34.2 ac. Legal Description: Williams Dairy CNMP Map Consplan Roads Land use ^"" Streams Crop •' $OItS C3Forest 0 Panel l::�J :J Hay 1) Pasture VaB CCC VaB ova HeC N W E S t Inch equals 400 feet 200 0 200 400 I Y Feet CeB2 WtB 7 �C� .9 Assisted by: NRCS Conservation Plan Map Date: 8/27/2007 ► � Customer(s): RICHARD WILLIAMS Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Agency: NRCS Tract 4490: Fields 17. 18, & 20 State and County: NC, RANDOLPH Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 21.9 Legal Description: Williams Dairy CNMP Map r 'q'µ 1f^�11. h1 _, 1, Yi ., 1. � #'•irl 'Z v �N astit,� 7r�,��tiPv@�L9 "E aMtsill$I�j a F e'',�-� �,i' t` �'ry".�.1 A �•'~%. •i•, ,�. `J-'.�' dqr' 'aM1'� A v'z ii q9 k „dy"" � � y r 5 4 i ••{ Irk �' k� d9 � y;� �,: i _ �y"'i. tau- � � s � Ivfl> mM �'•'vv' �,��°� . 6'.«' J _ � [ 6 � �.. �� .4r` '"' as "ti.�«.'a�'1r'.,.3�"��` x�r.wN•""r. r .•� y�///////jjj a.�g, IC �,. h �'!!•• 'ri�p'tl � - ,�` Y .Y ,1 � • i{{@� �'[ e � '"-i rt 'i4~e fl �I,t. '�5 1�� E �+ et .( .• .fir � �' • � d��fl+u. / y/lr• �1� �� -vlr ��y4, YI S : � �'; b� i '� / 2 � 11fT t',�r•4 4 � rh�� - � lrf� 41 A..., a. ��f/• Ll aF f a'`�,}'�`FI 9 �nt r� �,'✓^I � S '. � I. a wtiiP� s 4 �61p r � F r .�@ 2< >' 2 1 � •177 {�f �i' ' E i I( ' 3 � j � I EI �. ` SfFi� ` I �LI��lli��"f : F . � �� • R ' k . Y i i �?- 1 �F 7 e r� i• ��, �' R-, Consplan i Lagoon I; c Land use Irrigation 0 1 Forest � Raetla 10 3- E i ' t � Hay •'ram Streams w/•j✓ Headquarter 0 Parcel C3Pasture iE_::E_, Water p t -'' Watershed Protection ' a( Ir ' ;. t� r aii°"- 6 Y HI ff� � r > x 1 inch equals 300 feet N 75 0 75 ' 150 225 300 W+E Feet s Assisted by: n NRCS Conservation Plan Map Date: 8/27/2007 i ■ Customer(s): RICHARD WILLIAMS Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Agency: NRCS Tract 4490: Fields 17. 18, & 20 State and County: NC, RANDOLPH Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 21.9 Legal Description: Williams Dairy CNMP Map ,�t'E.>j� 3 i! 1€ae3i i, I.� X "• _ 1 [rl _ __ _�--•r7'•� Y IYQ� `'�: �'•-Y J ,.pi 2 aa:,;.. �i •'•:Y _ r,14. ,''A . 'r)« � 7 T, D 7' - V MI5 Ftif Nta M. 01, - - +�'. ,-', :}(V - - .•. -_ "ir - tit/r��l. `�•IR� Q•�1 \`R•�-'.F r?'-' r4' � • � I'+' r4.'_� -_ : ' • ... - . 76 tea., _ __ - - � -� _ - • • "w'�;- •may ��'� � ~ .,1• -_ -• --..mow Wow J'�s�'S�':4/,y�h'-�� h.�a"M� vi.� % �� y.�•` � r'b �'7[} ti d'`. w� "` w- 'x •': r i.. r ,7 r. . 1. '�11 .�,1y-"' �.�t,y y...�,��-..:"1," 4 ,yaw`, �'t• � � � �+` � - • •� .11. /lr �11� �11 fw`.r . r �"'...-"�'"''7 ' ',. '..• },,rr�a ii1 � :� ,.� 7 ,? a -• :, .7 �' a ,� '-r _•.i `„'." �,- � �„�� ,€rr, .. �. ,..�tr� yr y -V "yr V Y - •� 4, Y? L V i y7 �'._ K ..,, y'« .., .. - ��, •', .t43 � a ti �" . w. '� .� .7 � "� a � -=79:•��. -- •-: � .7 .,r. 'i:.€. fit• ,.•: •� a a Y a `� ` .7 �4'� a `� w �� i I`I ' i=?P i'�j ti7 J ti} ° •� as �7 a.� �o ,� a p J �c J a a a J ': ' a J� •� �, J s :a � ,� J/�„a(j.�� c ,a 'J a ti?a •a J J a ' 5 @ac ii a• r)� - Vaq a J 7 Y, Consplan Lagoon Land use Q Irrigation `� J l ti� V J '',• o �r� Y' •• Forest —•- Roads 4 p,C:- .,7 - Hay .n_ streams .. u J •:� a 34 k' .] J J _ ».•y�`'i;".'�:.+ ,- �"'Y', .�. a •r J Headquarters Soils �a ,,� :' '7 '� �� 9 - - - - ..i: - - 1,�a •" "] C Pasture Parcel Water Watershed Protectbn 1 inch equals 300 feet N 75 0 75 150 225 300 W+E Feet 6 Pall) ChA Assisted by: ® Conservation Plan Map Date: 8/27/2007 NRCS Customer(s): RICHARD WILLIAMS District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Tract 4564: Fields 1, 2, 5, 6 Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 56.6 ac, Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER Agency: NRCS State and County: NC, RANDOLPH Legal Description: Williams Dairy CNMP Map Iliams; alrYa,,4, N�,C,'�r�¢. ' l ya;�e C �� ¢.�a W�E , if�yrjprIT # � �' I y1 � � r�{��}!,c , y�f�3$' •4 v; � frF" -'°� 'rvk (°'-- t� ,.t:rryw �� as 1 inch equals 400 fee[ rU "' � Y t1 d` r # d 200 0 200 400 V. `k3.�;t'n_ ir� 4%4 t s A art #„y� P P! r, 15�. . l a ii� rat 4 4 '.� f. �cad� � � � y� �" y r �%#ItF,„ �: }: u` r 4. ) d . y • AK fP ro 31 ' ',z '�tS' fir` , �,s t e ». ,o• � , i i11.' irl✓r.a" #' _ E r.� � i+'� �,• Ar�u� � i�,t.l� fly iw t s' r ' t•" r � r :5 a •�r_ }l+.�P�v}S� ,�f '�a £ ur. E j£h,9 r 'ra Consplan Roads� �r Streams Land LISB ?qParcel �Q S a ally ry FTyrd t t �F } �+PAir � Crop ��,�° �h�'t-�r��'`f y Forest t s F Hay ilk f Y Ti �}7 kr gtygf £,n3fvi 1145�; y�J Headquarters tillIRiO "4 � Pasture£?,•}.Tp,�i� Hr ''I �' "�jJ�9f�I xn=�lr� 1. 3, Water -t ' .1€'r d' �• � e..r�l�ti °' f ta,. �'�. tr w 1 0, 0 Assisted by: Conservation Plan Map Date: 8/27/2007 NRCS ■ Customer(s): RICHARD WILLIAMS Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Agency: NRCS Tract 4564. Fields 1, 2, 5, 6 State and County: NC, RANDOLPH Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 56.6 ac. Legal Description: Williams Dairy CNMP Map r Williams a -v ` pC 06 1 inch equals 400 feel 200 0 200 400 Feel , - -- ~•pf...- J Y yyy � \t a c 1 � 97 �..icy'(.,:?: :''•: i�. •��:`� - ?GCB �.:::�',';,,�'::'::.,.;.,�, :':;':.:','•: Y, •J a ti•':• ram: .1`,: �.. _ �. 3 +rJ -;i .a'� J - v� >� Y Y J - - o a J J - � •a � J >] a .� •� h� �: J .j J •V a _� •, j ti.' .•! ', _ -- �9rI'I:i''' - _ : ;-.... C_d�. ,�, •� aka � ,-� ��'�,;,�: a v � o o a . , , i a a' r� • _ s,E.:,E• _ '•x • ' Ja � •.� a a .5 a '�. ,:'y^{ - _ "-,'.,- --.} �� J -.`�_ - •"f�a.: _.:-ram`;`-�;'�/,-. =:•'•."�."__- .o ,? S -. w> > ,Z'� a�. ,;�-^ � - `�c' `_ f ;: ''c_ f �:�•-. ter,:°--:.j „ 1� �" Consplan Roads? Land use Streams 7 YRi•., r r' :";1•'"` ��°'�� ::-�_"� - .� � a � 11 soils P A p Forest Q Parcel hY ,� Ha _ a v 4 a J J a ND Headquarters �.•:: jl:.w:':: -." Pasture _ � " �!� Water ,a J " v -'- GeC2 • • Assisted by: Conservation Plan Map Date: 8/27/2007 NRCS > Customer(s): RICHARD WILLIAMS Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Agency: NRCS Tract 4565: Fields 1 - 6 State and County: NC, RANDOLPH Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 48.7 ac. Legal Description- Williams Dairy CNMP Map y N: S : • .,€r�•.,,< .l y ,I rid€ .�P4•si.a1 f°II r' ��^}¢. iC. �V� ri (��pin /1 �'i��! 4 '�l�i Yl�Tj'C� E :Y` 'M fi -,4 � yi`��'�yi7��✓�. t7 .lF°K}5��ea ;��jllEy3� fi^I'�� -I �• ,� f-�n}}> €P6i. '�"�.�'�.at��.� a.G° �" € �' � `€ .r��'�!%?: ••1�� I I �i�a�&4` t'f Consplan Roads 2E Land use Streams"sl a �y} as °# f�2 p 0 ParcelCro Forest Hey �uy . ��- pf 1 ", ..i�l t i .��r7iiR�eky •d � :��`�{� y1B K.° , Pasture�.»�, 1 R Water U§, 1 inch equals 500 feet 250 0 250 500 Feet Assisted by: Conservation Plan Map Date: 8127/2007 NRCS Customer(s): RICHARD WILLIAMS Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Agency: NRCS Tract 4565: Fields 1 - 6 State and County: NC, RANDOLPH Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 48.7 ac. Legal Description: Williams Dairy CNMP Map VaB RftI 2'1 Yac . . . . . . . . . . .7 'P [; ��!!:..?'..;��. - _;" +fit•.-'� •'y v r ti'i 7 J tiJ �, !]f` Ri =17 0 -;1 -P Lill, 0 tac C -P Q, V. P 1J.' ON r, C c? "ICO 2 1t CT Consplan Roads Land use Streams Crop Solis Forest Parcel Hay Pasture CQ1 S Water :> ;> ad A 0 y. H B 0 1 Inch equals 500 feet 250 0 250 500 Feet N W+E S VaC BaC VaB BtB2 I Assisted by: t) Conservation Plan Map Date: 8/27/2007 MRCS ■ � Customer(s): RICHARD WILLIAMS Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Agency: NRCS Tract 4583: Fields 3, 4, 5 State and County: NC, RANDOLPH Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 28 ac. Legal Description: Williams Dairy CNMP Map 14. at 4J. srjl e!s��pp33�e�:,. b,;,, a k _ ew h. "" _ w , 'Y{{• .�� q,• if, S �? .g � rs. �Yn fV. yy 'h ' 1�tt. 'i`i, g$^� fY ,,yy 4 .,Fs�'"'i.VY "ab uN"� it$"'� a•Sv "• r ;r)r2 zs �1d % w wn`A��••'.,c• i..+.T"'.w.'w' ar . isa'.e�..., ni d( ',��d♦�` -f.3it a ay., y y. ♦ a} A jL E F �� - '4 i'>�_ �r � { # +pr,}�4k+�,;. 'x. "w•.,r;-ak•. r°. '�' r,• i' �" a .Hp. �4�+a.+.� aff �•i.M14 �i •rY,a 1"r • w h.i y .�p f ♦ .ws j" �"tr*„�>r.w'a.. .rr, My+�; J � � :I f r Y ' iff !E�hh66Tr��'^^y 'FFYl rY I 9.. ��.".',�'`f,#��'`��a '� �wlliarn`s�aE lid��ra� ��,'�ps�fl4"n.�-"M#` ��`n�•'�,r�" Ql� � i '� -r.f�. ��a��'r++M • �I�Ri� COnspian +M"' Streams ! ; l-,.I` a t �E3s'� - 0 ,� 41 a,r s r ! Land use Q Parcel t air, 5� 1 �� , i x1 � !#EI ��.a �� Crop "Yi 9b� Forest '°.��dN�il; �it3u�" a's •�: Hey ¢ i f, f t� ��` r P r �r.. C. Headquarters Pasture��'�iu4rr" i !!lE<< €U#!`� �If.,l4i.3.i.,iaP�i.lt�lw4.'dr? N 1 inch equals 400 feet 100 0 100 200 300 400 W + E Feet 5 Assisted by: Conservation Plan Map Date: 8/27/2007 NRCS ■( �� Customer(s): RICHARD WILLIAMS Field Office: ASHEBORO SERVICE CENTER District: RANDOLPH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Agency: NRCS Tract 4583: Fields 3, 4, 5 State and County: NC, RANDOLPH Approx. Acres Waste Application Fields: 28 ac. Legal Description: Williams Dairy CNMP Map a� , 7 vac aC 9 a 3 a a a o �3 k+a J .? _ _ -- ,3a :� a n yso � .a a J Ju •� a •' •:� ,�" ��- _ - ? r� � a +� .� .a J a •J � -'�- _ - � ° J a J a .� J a _ .:' « � J ,, � �:: _ ;�. � .,.t-�':r.. -•� ' J " J �;� ;i _ ' _ '«' " .;� ;� a F•fi'eG�J a ^.J J 1`.'7 a© J ° •' '�,..."''.,� :,"""'"...' aJ o �.J4a "_ J;4_$C:�.. -^`'- ' c•.; -, a ay �, a 'J a aJ a "� :"; �„ a.., •' S.� _ `'' +.� v '� yew FR '•r, arp 4sa Q w,� � ,yj '' �} �•' _ '� a M 7 � .J r a v k M3- i� rrc "'r rrC"i�m1i„ ►' � ti i 7 `.•'i ? ., 9 •." .� '• y q ,�^.., ".tee, ,+++��. -,'�,,.,,",•�►.�: w • � Sa .,7}�� Y7 � � � .} a ^� .� a � :� A -•'-{::'�-,•_�:�~ ,.��'- w a � � .h.:. ,' w.. ,w� _.� mow.. µ.'"• .-. a � a ti' ,,,) '� 3 til ;a q -. •�- :.~ _� .;j .,1 .. J M1 y��Y"V asp hv,� ;,,e,J•.. N '7 y1 y1 P. d .,:- a a J 1�:.•;_•:i .11'=`. _ l , • r, «. slid a+^ w. y 1 -1 C'] J va e "f; � - =�"-' .J V a v ti `� a ,.,•w•`. wj,w` M„`". :++�..`+. ,w M.,, +.: ,� -a.J J a a ti-aJ J n by a '� -j _ •� r � ••••";.,�.• .. ""••• � w` �- "' dts yz J ♦ _ b 4 :y a '� 7 7 • ti"� _ � Y .+.'� - ,w"" Jy..:"'4� ww '� ""„n;o. •..��'rw' y ��.�: •�. _ e..'; •. �!�'ti �a."ti � '� ..!may ,!i ry. o v a .. "� .� ti� +^ ��•., '� 'Y '^ v 7 � Yt a •1 a` r � .r „r .. .ti. ,r r � .... a s aaJha a a�� aaJ a r, J a a1 a wti1 a o aB> y :• ApB •y - ^: 'w� J . '� �: Y a "«•''�,;,•n,.. ,,.••. ,Pry. •fit ' J aQ J J � C. J Consplan -e%.— Streams Land use 0 soils ApC Crop Q Parcel , C3 Forest RnC Hay W Headquarters WpE Pasture / WtC N 1 inch equals 400 feet 100 0 100 200 300 400 W+E Feet S S S + LTD-" NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Beverly Eaves Perdue Governor Jeanette Williams Williams Dairy 3385 Williams Dairy Rd Liberty, NC 27298 Dear Jeanette Williams: Division of Water Quality Coleen H. Sullins Director October 1, 2009 =RECOVEDa Freeman Secretary I Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC760050 Williams Dairy Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Randolph County In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jeanette Williams, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AW0200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) for the Williams Dairy, located in Randolph County, with an animal capacity of no greater than the following annual averages: Dairy Calf: Dry Cow: Beef Brood Cow: Dairy Heifer: Beef Stocker Calf- Other: Milk Cow: 250 Beef Feeder: The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void Certificate of Coverage Number AWC760050 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COG An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals, Please carefully read this COC and -the enclose&State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.- 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636 Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 011e, Phone: 9IS-733-3221 1 FAX: 919.715-05881 Customer Service: 1-877-623-674B NonhCarUlina Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org An Equal Opportunq 1 Atfirmadve Action Employer i7t11rrr l!1 '4 w If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate you will need to have a new WUP developed. The issuance of this.CQC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate 1.11 under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. Per 15A NCAC'2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143- 215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration. This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. In accordance with Condition I1.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4) hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning, or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National Weather Service office at (919) 515-8209, or by visiting their website at: www.erh.noaa.gov/er/rah/ This facility is located in a county covered by our Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at (336) 771-4600. If you need additional infonnation concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-3221. Sincerely, for Coleen H. Sullins Enclosure (General Permit AWG200000) cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs) Winston-Salem Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section Randolph County Health Department Randolph County Soil and Water Conservation District APS Central Files (Permit No. AWC760050) AFO Notebooks Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization 03-21-loos This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been developed by: Willliams Dairy Joe Hudyncia Richard Williams USDA-NRCS 3385 Williams Dairy Rd. 241 Sunset Avenue, Suite 105 Federal Building Liberty, NC 27298-8135 / Asheboro, NC 27203 336-622-4762 336 629-4449, Ext. 3 Developer Signature Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning anima] waste management that are included with this plan. Signature (owner) Date Signature (manager or producer) D This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission. Plan Approved By: S Technical Specialist Signature Date Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-21-2008 Cover Page I RECEIVED 1 DENR 1 DWQ Aquifer Protection Section MAR 2 4 2009 Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following source(s): Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan. U6 Williams Dairy (Liquid Only) waste generated 343,250 gals/year by a 250 animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 814 Incorporated 1265 Injected 1369 Irrigated 866 Max. Avail. PAN (Ibs) * Actual PAN Applied (lbs) PAN Surplus/ Deficit (lbs) Actual Volume Applied (Gallons) Volume Surplus/ Deficit (Gallons) Year 1 866 965 -99 382,374 -39,124 U9 Williams Dairy (Solids Only) waste generated 4,200.00 tons/year by a 250 animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid operation. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 18060 Incorporated 23 940 Injected N/A Irrigated N/A Max. Avail. PAN (lbs) * Actual PAN Applied (Ibs) PAN Surplus/ Deficit (Ibs) Actual Quantity Applied (Tons) Surplus/Deficit (Tons) Year 1 22,490 36190 -13,700 7,385.75 -3,185.75 This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42 entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source. Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source. * Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source. 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 Source Page Page 1 of 1 Narrative WILLIAMS DAIRY, LLC September 2007 This 250 head dairy operation is owned by Richard & Barbara Williams, and Jeanette Williams, and is operated by Richard Williams. The farm is located in northeast Randolph County (Liberty Township), approximately seven miles west of Liberty, NC on Williams Dairy Rd. The physical address of the farm is 3385 Williams Dairy Rd., Liberty, NC. Animal waste is applied from two sources: broadcast solids and irrigated liquids. Waste is scraped from the lot into an open stack with the solids seperated using pickets. The liquid waste from this operation then drains to the single waste storage pond, which is a dairy liquid manure slurry. There are 8.52 acres under solid set irrigation for the disposal of the liquid waste from the storage pond. The remaining solid waste is broadcast applied using a manure spreader. Refer to the included maps for details about field location, size, soil types, etc. The included maps also indicate the approximate location of irrigation coverage in the two fields (Tract 4490) with solid set irrigation. There are 9 hydrants in field 18 and 5 hydrants in field 20. The predominant crop rotation on this farm is corn silage followed by small grain silage. Conventional tillage is used for corn production so that broadcast animal waste is soil -incorporated. A no -till planter is used for planting small grain into corn stubble. For this crop waste is broadcast applied without incorporation. Pasture and hay land are integral to the dairy operation and are maintained under a high level of management. Rotational grazing is used on much of the pasture land. Fescue pasture is overseeded with Marshall Ryegrass in the fall to extend the season of high -quality pasture for the cattle and also help conserve soil, water and nutrients. The DWQ Facility I.D. is AWC760050. This dairy operation lies within the Cape Fear River Basin. The five tracts that comprise this dairy farm contain and/or border several unnamed tributaries of Sandy Creek and two of the tracts border Sandy Creek directly. Nutrients are to be applied according to the attached Nutrient Management Plan in order to maximize plant production, properly utilize manure on these fields, and minimize off -site transport of the nutrients applied. This plan identifies the amount, source, placement, and timing of nutrients to be applied for these fields. Nitrogen application rates are based on realistic yield expectations for the crop, soil type and field slope. Application rates for other nutrients and amendments are based on a soil test. Waste applications must be made in accordance with land application setbacks as set by the state of North Carolina, as well as applicable federal and local laws. Current setbacks are available at the NC Division of Soil & Water Conservation 1217 guidance website: http://www.enr.state.nc.us/DSWC/pages/guidance—docs.html Because animal waste is being applied, all fields in this plan have been evaluated for potential phosphorous loss using the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT). (*Phosphorous lost from fields can become pollution in surface water through surface runoff, erosion of soil or by leaching). The PLAT rating for each field is listed in the Planned Crops Summary section of this waste plan. A field with a PLAT rating of'Iow' or 'medium' requires no additional measures. A rating of high will require reduced Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 Narrative Page Page 1 of 3 0C Narrative manure applications, and a rating of'very high' will require ceasing all waste applications to that field. All PLAT calculations for this plan were done using the most recent waste analysis report (W07756) dated 3/30/2007. Soils information was obtained from the most recent soil test report (32088) dated 4/17/2007. All maps included with this plan have been generated specifically for use with Nutrient Management planning and implementation. Aerial images from the Farm Service Agency's (2006) National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) were used for generation of plan maps with photographs. Road, stream, soils and parcel information were obtained from Randolph County's GIS database. Important considerations: *Soil tests are to be taken annually on all fields that receive animal waste. *Waste analyses are to be taken within 60 days of applying waste from a source. *Manure should not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting new crops or to forages breaking dormancy. Otherwise applications are made to actively growing crops. *When any commercial fertilizers are used (including starter fertilizer), they need to be included in the nutrient budget and recorded on the appropriate record -keeping form. *Liming material should be applied as indicated by the soil test to adjust soil pH to the specific range required by the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum availability and utilization of nutrients. *Application equipment (irrigation, honey wagons, manure spreaders, etc.) are to be properly calibrated to ensure uniform distribution of material at planned rates. *Accurate harvest records are always beneficial for future planning and decision making. Summary of Tracts with waste application fields included in this CLAMP: Tract Fields Acres Owner 4484 5 31.2 Williams, J. 4490 3 12.7 Williams, J. 4564 4 56.6 Williams, J. 4565 6 48.7 Williams, R. & B. 4583 3 28.0 Williams, J. *ORIGINAL WASTE PLAN VOLUME CALCULATIONS FOR DISPOSAL (User Defined Sources) 250 cows x 1.96 cu. ft/cow/day x 120 days of storage x 100% confinement = 58,800 cu. ft. of storage ----••--------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- -• --- - ------------- 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 Narrative Page Page 2 of 3 0 Narrative needed for waste generated from milk cows for the time they are on the lot. TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED: 58,800 cu. ft. for 120 days of storage of all waste generated for all animals. (Excluding storage needed for lot runoff from rain events and storms) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOLIDS: 250 cows--58,800 cu. ft (total waste produced for time on the lot for 120 days). x 1.5 cu. ft./cow/day (solids) / 1.96 cu. ft./cow/day (total) = 45,000 cu. ft. (solids for 120 days) (45,000 cu. ft. (cows) x 3 (no. of 120 day periods in a year = 135,000 cu. ft./yr 135,000 cu. ft./yr x 62.4 lbs/cu. ft.=8,424,000 lbs./yr 8,424,000 lbs./yr. / 2000 lbs./ton = 4212 tons/yr. 4212 tons/yr. / 250 head = 16.8 tons/head/yr. of solids LIQUIDS: COWS: 58,800 cu. ft. (total waste produced for time on lot for 120 days). x 0.46 cu. ft./cow/day (liquid) / 1.96 cu. ft./cow/day (total = 13,800 cu. ft. (liquids for 120 days) (13,800 cu. ft. (cows) x 3 (no. of 120 day periods in a year) = 41,400 cu. ft./yr. 41,400 cu. ft./yr. x 7.48 gals./cu.ft. = 309,672 gals./yr. 309,672 gals./yr. (from animals) 33,598 gals./yr. (lot run-off) (5889/open drystack, 9592/lot runoff, 5500/25yr lot runoff, 12,617/25 yr pond surface) 33,598 gals./250 head = 1373 gals./head/yr. of liquids .................................... ..--------------------- ---- - ------ --- 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date printed: 01-16-2008 Narrative Page Page 3 of 3 The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available. If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High. Planned Crops Summary P205 Total Useable Plat Removal Applied Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre) (Ibs/acre) 4484 2 5.6 5.60 Low N/A Vance Orchardgrass Hay 2.9 Tons 42 NIA 4484 3 4.001 4.00 Low N/A I Vance Small Grain, Silage 6.4 Tons 35 N/A Corn, Silage 14.4 Tons 49 N/A 4484 4 6.60 6.60 Low N/A Vance Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons 38 NIA Corn, Silage 15.7 Tons 53 N/A 4484 5 8,20 8.20 Low NIA Cecil Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons 52 N/A Corn, Silage 20.0 Tons 68 N/A 4484 7 9.80 9.80 Low N/A Vance Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons 38 N/A Corn, Silage 15.7 Tons 53 NIA 4490 17 4.20 4.20 Low N/A Vance Fescue Hay 4.3 Tons 68 N/A 4490 18(N1) 5.44 0.60 Medium N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 5 N/A 4490 18(N2) 5.44 0.60 Medium N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 1 3.2 Tons 5 N/A 4490 18(N3) 5.44 0.60 Medium N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 5 N/A 4490 18(N4) 5.44 0.60 Medium N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 5 NIA 4490 18(N5) 5.44 0.60 Low NIA Vance Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 6 N/A 4490 18(N6) 5.441 0.60 Low N/A Vance Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 6 N/A 4490 1 g(N7) 5.44 0.60 Low N/A Vance Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 6 N/A 4490 18(N8) 5.44 0.60 Low N/A Vance Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 6 N/A 4490 1 "9) 5.44 0.60 Low N/A Vance Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 6 N/A 4490 20(S I) 3.08 0.62 Medium NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 6 NIA 4490 20(S2) 3.08 0.62 Medium N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 6 N/A 4490 20(S3) 3.08 0.62 Medium N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 6 N/A 4490 20(S4) 3.08 0.62 Medium N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 6 N/A 4490 20(SS) 3.02 0.62 Medium N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 6 N/A 4564 1 3.60 3.60 Low NIA Ap ling Small Grain, Silage 9.2 Tons 50 NIA Corn, Silage 20.0 Tons 68 N/A 4564 2 4.00.4.00 Medium NIA Helena Small Grain, Silage 7.4 Tons 40 NIA Corn, Silage 13.9 Tons 47 N/A 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 1/16/2008 PCS Page Page I of 3 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. • C) 0 Planned Crops Summary 1'205 Total Useable Plat Removal Applied Tract Field Acres Acres Rating Ll Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (Ibslacre) (Ibs/acre) 4564 5 16.20 16.20 Medium N/A Helena Small Grain, Silage 7.4 Tons 40 N/A Corn, Silage 13.9 Tons 47 N/A 4564 6 32.8 32.80 Low NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 5 N/A 4565 1 16.1 16,10 Low N/A Appling Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 1 8 N/A 4565 2 13.9 13.90 Low N/A Cecil Small Grain, Silage 8.8 Tons 48 N/A Com, Silage 18.4 Tons 63 N/A 4565 3 4.60 4.60 Low NIA Cecil Small Grain, Silage 8.8 Tons 48 N/A Com, Silage 18.4 Tons 63 N/A 4565 4 4.00 4.00 Low NIA Cecil Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons 52 N/A Corn, Silage 20.0 Tons 68 N/A 4565 5 6.10 6.10 Low N/A Helena Small Grain, Silage 6.8 Tons 37 N/A Corn, Silage 12.8 Tons 44 N/A 4565 6 4.0 4001 Medium N/A Helena Small Grain, Silage 6.8 Tons 37 N/A Corn, Silage 12.8 Tons 44 N/A 4583 3 13.1 13.10 Low N/A Vance Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 7 N/A 4583 4 9.7 9.70 Low NIA Appling Small Grain, Silage 9.2 Tons 50 NIA Com, Silage 20.0 Tons 68 N/A 4583 5 5.2CI 5,20 Medium N/A Mecklenburg Small Grain, Silage 7.8 Tons 42 N/A Com, Silage 16.5 Tons 56 N/A PLAN TOTALS: 236.06 180.22 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 1/16/2008 PCS Page Page 2 of 3 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. Ll Potential leaching 7echnical Guidance 2 Low potential to contribute to soluble None nutrient leaching below the root zone. >= 2 & Mod crate potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. <= 10 nutrient leaching below the root zone. High potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils nutrient leaching below the root zone. available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples a 10 are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391). PLAT Index Rating P Management Recommendation 0 - 25 Low No adjustment needed; N based application 25 - 50 Medium No adjustment needed; N based application 51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal 100 Very High Starter P application only 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 1/16/2008 PCS Page Page 3 of 3 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the craps to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake. This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantityr of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides' for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation. Waste Utilization Table Year 1 W Tract Field Source ID Soil series Total Acres Usc. Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd (lbs1A) Comm. Fen, Nutrient Applied (lbs/A) Res, (Ibs/A) Applic. Method Manure PA Nutrien pplied (lbs/A) Liquid ManureA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Appli (Field) N N N N 1000 gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 4484 2 U9 Vance 5.60 5.60 Orcbardgrass Hay 2.9 Tons 811-7131 129 0 0 Broad. 129 0.00 30.00 0.00 168.00 4484 3 U9 Vance 4.00 4.00 Small Grain, Silage 6.4 Tons 911-3/31 71 0 0 Broad. 71 0.00 16.5E 0.00 66.05 4484 3 U9 Vance 4.00 4.00 Com, Silage 14.4 Ton 2/15-6/30 157 0 0 Incor. 157 0.00 27.54 0.00 110.17 4484 4 U9 Vance 6.60 6.60 Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 78 0 0 Broad. 78 0.00 18.14 0.00 119.72 4484 4 U9 Vance 6.60 6.60 Cam, Silage 15.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 171 0 0 Incur. 171 0.00 30,00 0.00 198.0 4484 5 U9 Cecil 8.20 8.20 Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons 911-3/31 107 0 0 Broad. 107 0.00 24.88 0.00 204.04 4484 5 U9 Cecil 8.20 8.20 Corn, Silage 0.0 Ton 2/15-6/30 218 0 0 Incor. 218 0.00 38.25 0.00 313.6 4484 7 U9 Vance 9.80 9.80 Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 78 0 0 Broad. 78 0.00 18.14 0.00 177. 4484 7 U9 Vance 9.80 9.80 Com, Silage 15.7 Ton 2/15-6/30 171 0 0 Incor. 171 0.00 30.00 0.00 294. 4490 17 U9 Vance 4.20 4.20 Fescue Hay 4.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 191 0 0 Broad. 191 0.00 44.42 0.00 186.56 4490 E8(NI} U6 Helena 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 8/1-7131 104 0 0 Irrig. 104 41.20 0.0 24.90 0.00 4490 18(N2) U6 Helena 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 104 0 0 Irrig. 104 41.20 0.00 24.90 0.00 4490 18(N3) U6 Helena 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 104 0 0 Irrig. 104 41.20 0.00 24.90 0.00 4490 18(N4) U6 Helena 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 8/1-7131 104 0 0 Irrig. 104 41.20 0.00 24.90 0.00 4490 I8(N5) U6 Vance 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 8/1-7/31 120 0 0 Irrig. 120 47.54 0.00 28.73 0.00 4490 18(N6) U6 ance 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tans 8/1-7131 120 0 0 Irrig. 12 47.54 0.00 28.73 0.00 A 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 WUT Page Page i of 3 Waste Utilization Table Year 1 Nitrogen Comm, Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid PA Fert (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000 Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N teal/A Tons 1000 LmIs tons 4490 18(N7) U6 Vance 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 811-7/31 120 0 0 Irrig. 120 47.54 0.00 28.73 0.00 4490 18(N8) U6 Vance. 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 8/1-7131 120 0 0 Irrig. 120 4T54 0.00 28.73 0.00 4490 18(N9) U6 Vance 5.44 0.60 Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 8/1-7/31 120 0 0 Irrig. 120 47.54 0.00 28.73 0.0 4490 20(S1) U6 Helena 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 Irrig. 114 45.16 0.00 27.83 0. 4490 20(S2) U6 Helena 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 IrHR. 114 45.16 0.00 27.83 O .0" `. r 4490 20(S3) U6 Helena 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 Irrig. 114 45.16 0.00 2T83 0.00 4490 20(S4) U6 Helena 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 114 0 0 Irrig. 114 45.16 0.00 27,83 0.00 4490 20(S5) U6 Helena 3.08 0,62 Fescue Pasture 3.5 Tons 8/1-7131 114 0 0 Irrig. 114 45.16 0.00 27.83 0.00 4564 1 U9 ppling 3.60 3.60 Small Grain, Silage 9.2 Tons 911-3131 102 0 0 Broad. 102 0.00 23.72 0.00 85.39 4564 1 U9 ppling 3.60 3.60 Cam, Silage 20,0 Ton 2115-6/30 218 0 0 Incor. 218 0.00 38.25 0.00 13T68 4564 2 U9 Helena 4.00 4.00 Small Grain, Silage 7A Tons 911-3/31 80 0 0 Broad. 80 0.00 18.60 0.00 74.42 4564 2 U9 Helena 4.00 4.00 Com, Silage 13.9 Ton 2115-6/30 149 0 0 Incor. 149 0.00 26.14 0.00 104.56 4564 5 U9 Helena 16.20 1610 Small Grain, Silage 7.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 80 0 0 1 Broad. 80 0.00 18.60 0.00 301,39 4564 5 U9 Helena 16.20 16.20 Corn, Silage 139 Ton 2/15-6/30 149 0 1 0 1 Incor. 149 0.00 26.14 0.00 423. 4564 1 6 U9 jHelena 1 32.801 32.80 Fescue Pasture 3.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 104 0 0 1 Broad. 1 1041 0.00 24.191 0.00 793 4 4565 1 U9 Appling 16.10 16.10 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 811-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 160 0.00 37.21 0.00 599.06 4565 2 U9 Cecil 13.90 13.90 Small Grain, Silage 8.9 Tons 9/1-3/31 98 0 0 Broad. 98 0.00 22.79 0.00 316.79 4565 2 U9 Cecil 13.901 13.90 Com, Silage 18.4 Ton 2115-6/30 201 0 0 Incor. 1 201 0.001 35.26 0.001 490,15 4565 3 U9 Cecil 4.60 4.60 Small Grain, Silage 8.8 Tans 9/1-3131 98 0 0 Broad. 98 0.00 22.79 0.00 104.84 4565 3 U9 Cecil 4.60 4.60 Com, Silage 18.4 Ton 2/15-6130 201 0 0 Incor. 201 0.00 35.26 0.00 162.21 4565 4 U9 ecil 4.00 4.00 Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 107 0 0 Broad. 107 0.00 24.88 0.00 99.53 4565 4 1 U9 Cecil 1 4.00 4.00 Corn, Silage 20,0 Ton 2/15- i/30 218 0 0 1 Incor- 218 0.00 38.25 0.00 152.98 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 WUT Page Page 2 of 3 Waste Utilization Table Year I Tract Field Source ID Soil Series Total Acres Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic, Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd (lbslA) Comm. I Fen. Nutrient Applied (lbs/A) Res. (ibslA) I Applic. Method Manure PA NutrientA pplied (lbslA) Liquid ManumA pplied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N N N 1V 1000 gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons 4565 5 U9 Helena 6,10 6.10 Small Grain, Silage 6.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 73 0 0 Broad. 73 0.00 16.98 0.00 103.56 4565 5 U9 Helena 6.10 6.10 Corn, Silage 12.8 Ton 2/15-&30 137 0 0 Incor. 137 0.00 24.03 0.00 146.61 4565 6 U9 Helena 4.00 4.00 Small Grain, Silage 6.8 Tans 9/1-3/31 73 0 0 Broad. 73 0.00 16.98 0.00 67.9 4565 6 U9 Helena 4.00 4.00 Corn, Silage 12.8 Tan 2/15-6/30 137 0 0 Incor, 137 0.00 24.03 OM 96.1 4583 3 U9 Vance 13.10 13,10 Fescue Pasture 4,1 Tons 8/1-7131 137 0 0 Broad. 137 0.00 31.8 0.00 417.3 4583 4 U9 ppling 9.70 9.70 Small Grain, Silage 9.2 Tons 9/1-3/31 102 0 0 Broad, 102 0.00 23.72 0.00 230.09 4583 4 U9 ppling 9,70 9.70 Corn, Silage 0.0 Ton 2/15-6/30 218 0 0 Incor. 218 0.00 38.25 0.00 370,99 4583 5 U9 Mecklenburg 5.20 5.20 Small Grain, Silage 7.9 Tons 9/1-3/31 87 0 0 Broad. 87 0.00 20.23 0,00 105.21 4583 5 U9 Mecklenburg 5.20 5.20 Corn, Silage 16.5 Ton 2/15-6/30 180 1 0 0 Incor. 190 0.00 31.58 0.00 164.21 Total Applied, 1000 gallons 382.37 Total Produced, 1000 gallons 343.25 Balance, 1000 gallons -39.12 Total Applied, tons 7,385.75 Total Produced, tons 4.200.00 Balance, tons Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- syrnbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data. 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 WUT Page Page 3 of 3 The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application event. Irrigation Application Factors Tract Field Soil Series Application Rate (inchesthour) Application Amount (inches) 4490 18(N1) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 18(N2) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 18(N3) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 18(N4) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 18(N5) Vance 0.35 1.0 4490 18(N6) Vance 0.35 I.0 4490 18(N7) . Vance 0.35 1.0 4490 18(N8) Vance 0.35 1.0 4490 18(N9) Vance 0.35 1.0 4490 20(SI) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 20(S2) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 20(S3) Helena 0.20 1.0 4490 20(S4) Helena 1 0.20 1 1.0 4490 20(S5) jHelena 1 0.20 11.0 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 1/16/2008 1AF Page Page 1 of 1 XfOTR• Grmhnl * mPanc neNr r ntararl �afa The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The quantityof nutrient supplied by each source is also identified. The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen. Nutrient Management Recommendations, Test YEAR 0 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (Ibs/A) Cu (lbs1A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4484 3 Req'd Nutrients 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App. Period 4.00 911-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 6.4 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 71 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 PRemoval Rating 35lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 -1 Tract Field 4484 4 Req'd Nutrients 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres TApp. Period 6.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: t `° '' W ill MOM NOW CROP Small Grain, Silage Statter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 7.0 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 38 lbs/ac. Law BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 Tract Field 4484 5 Req'd Nutrients 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App. Period 8.20i 911-3131 Supplied By tr iP 1 s': CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 9.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRemoval Rating 52lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 Tract Field 4484 7 Req'd Nutrients 78 90 60 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App. Period 9.80 9/l 3/31 Supplied By: i '_i r - ei•7 5 , , •:: F�'� )� tt L �`,6, a E>g<l§?;I3�r� P� f#� PM' +, a �%$... Is°aFt 6.ri q F e{4: 6 # ,. � ; 11�a .. ii x's,s �% i� iff : _'�3,,.. �I�.. V i z ,-P .n,._ k F1 e � .R.,.,.1 CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 7.0 Tons 1 04-17-07 Manure 78 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 38 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 1 0 -94) -60 0 0 0 0 -1 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 UMR Page Page I of 10 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 0 N (Ibs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4564 1 Req'd Nutrients 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App, Period 3.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 9.2 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 102 0 0 01 0 01 0 0 P Removal I Rating 50 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4564 2 Req'd Nutrients 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App, Period 4.00 911-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 7.4 Tons 1 04-17-07 Manure 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 40 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4564 5 Req'd Nutrients 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 16.20 9/I-3/31 Supplied By: € CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.4 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l Rating 40 lbs/ae. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ERYEmpleDate Field 4565 2 Req'd Nutrients 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0pp. Period 13.90 9/I-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Dole 8.8 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 48 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4565 3 Req'd Nutrients 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres I App. Period 4.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 8.8 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 98 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 48 lbs/ac. Low IIALANCF 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 l 230981 Database Version 3.1 Dale Printed: 1/16/2008 NNIR Page Page 2 of 10 • Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 0 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract T Field 4565 4 Req'd Nutrients 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App. Period 4.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mple Date 9.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0l R Rating 52 Ibs/ae. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 Field 4565 5 Roq d Nutrients 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 pp. Period 6.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ample Date 6.8 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 val Rating 37lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 E Field 4565 6 Req'd Nutrients 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 App. Period 4.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: a ° E' l€,; '3 I ' CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 RYE Sample Date 6.8 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 37 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 Tract Field 4583 4 Req'd Nutrients 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 9.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By: �+ j t��? Iry III€t ' s :�' '1 `" CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appiing Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Date 9.2 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ting pAcresApp. 50lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 eld 4583 5 Req'd Nutrients 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 eriod 5.20 9/1-3/31 Su liedB PP Y ' �g' I�a"T . < ,. a r_ a3 k, fO°I. ` � _ ,� VI CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 RYE Sample Date 7.8 Tons 1 04-17-07 Manure 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 42 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE I 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. 230991 Databasc Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 NM Page Page •3 of 10 • 0 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (Ibs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4484 2 Req'd Nutrients 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Acres App. Period 5.60 9/1-7/31 Supplied By: CROP Orchardgrass Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 2.9 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 42 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Tract Field 4484 3 Req'd Nutrients 157 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4,00 2115-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Com, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. ol 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 14.4 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 157 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 49 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 -40 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4484 4 Rcq'd Nutrients 171 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Acres IApp. Period 6.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: WMm CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 15,7 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 171 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 53 lbs/ac. Law BALANCE 0 0 -40 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4484 5 Req'd Nutrients 218 0 10 0 0 0 0. 0 Acres I App, Period 8.20 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: r ;4;> <ANN .- .4 Ww WIN3.,w • ,,,: ;. a" Sam CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 20.0 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 68 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 -10 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4484 7 Req'd Nutrients 171 l00 110 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App, Period 9.80 2/15-/30 Supplied By: � f�° " mom CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 15.7 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 171 01 0 01 0 0 0 0 PRemoval I Rating 53lbs/ac. 1-ow BALANCE 1 0 -I00 -110 0 0 01 01 0 230981 Database Version 3.1 Datc Printed: 1/16/2009 NM It Page Page 4 of 10 • n Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tonslA) Tract Field 4490 17 Rc4d Nutrients 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.20 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 4.3 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 68 Ibslac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4490 18(NI) Req'dNutrients 104 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 le Date . 3.2 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rating 5 lbs/ac. edium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R Field 4490 18(N2) Req'd Nutrients 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Period 0.60 811-7131 Supplied By: ft" AW ISM WON CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Date 3.2 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l Rating 5 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ERYEmple Field 4490 18(N3) Req'd Nutrients 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pp. Period 0.60 811-7131 Supplied By: .K.W.4 CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 3.2 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 5 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Tract Field 4490 18(N4) Req'd Nutrients 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 0.60 811-7131 Supplied By: �7��':,> �F "M CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 3.2 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRemova] Rating 5lbslac. Medium BAi_ANCF 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 230981 Database Vcrsiun 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 NMR Page Page 5 of 10 • 0 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4490 18(N5) Req'd Nutrients 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 3.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 120 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 P Removal Rating 6 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 Tract I Field 4490 18(N6) Req'd Nutrients 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 0.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 3.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRemoval I Rating 6lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4490 18(N7) Req'd Nutrients 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: 19" Now LIM WNW A" sm. Mau mom CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 RYE Sample Date 3.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 6 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ract r Field 4490 18(N8) Req'd Nutrients 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 res App. Period 0.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 RYE Sample Date 3.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PRemoval I Rating 6lbs/ac. Low ' BALANCE 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4490 18(N9) Req'd Nutrients 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 0.60 811-7/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 3.6 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 6lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 230981 1 Database Version 3.t Date Printed: 1/16/2008 NM Page Page 6 of 10 Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N (Ibs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (Ibs/A) Mg (Ibs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (Ibs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract I Field 4490 20(S 1) Req'd Nutrients 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.62 8/1-7f31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 3.5 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 6 lbslac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract. Field 4490 20(S2) Req'd Nutrients 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0,62 8/1-7131 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 3.5 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 6 lbslac. Medium BALANCE 01 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 Tract Field 4490 20(S3) Req'd Nutrients 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.62 811-7131 Supplied By: Qmom NO" Om If= RIM MOMM" low CROP Fescue Pasture. Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 RYE Sample Date 3.5 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 6 lbslac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4490 20(S4) Req'd Nutrients 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.62 811-7/31 Supplied By: ; CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Ferl. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 3.5 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 1141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 6 lbslac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4490 20(S5) Req'd Nutrients 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 0.62 811-7/31 Supplied By: J � `' � ,_ �' m OEM NR= CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 3.5 'Pons 04-17-07 1 Manure 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 6 lbslac. Medium BALANCI: 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 NMR Page Page 7 of 10 • r 1 L_J Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N (lbs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (1bs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4564 1 Req'd Nutrients 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 3.60 2/15 6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 20.0 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 218 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 P Removal I Rating 68 lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4564 2 Req'd Nutrients 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 4.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 13.9 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 149 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 47 !bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4564 5 Req'd Nutrients 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I A Period PP� 16.20 2/15-6130 Supplied B PP Y � �aI �tT°e". F ;. � __ �� o ,, CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ample Date 13.9 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 val Rating 47 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Field E 4564 6 Req'd Nutrients 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 App. Period 32.84 8/1-7131 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 3.2 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 5 lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4565 1 Req'd Nutrients 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 16.10 8/1-7131 Supplied By: 'x ' 4� k.� .r:.:. ? I' 71� ON,;.- [ ..*&°.c°h.: 4 ''�.,a. ,'�.r"� r ra ;,. '�. -,as.�inN t. ; `'. �.«r i ;i 3 ��,.a.�3ux '.3ow CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 8 lbslac. !_ow BALANCE: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 230981 Dalabase Version 3.1 - Date Printed: 1/16/2008 NMR Page Page 8 of 10 • Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR 1 N (lbs/A) P2O5 (lbs/A) K2O (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract I Field 4565 2 Req'dNutrients 201 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 13.90 2/15-&30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 18.4 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 63 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 -10 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4565 3 Req'dNutrients 201 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.60 2/15 6130 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 18.4 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 63 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 -10 '01 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4565 4 Req'd Nutrients 218 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 Soil Series Cecil Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 20.0 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 68 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 -10 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4565 5 Req'd Nutrients 137 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 6.10 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 12.8 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal I Rating 44 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 -10 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4565 6 Req'd Nutrients 137 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App. Period 4.00 2/15-6130 Supplied By: xI 'i."�,K CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series I lelena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 12.8 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 44 Ihs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 -10 0 0 0 0 0 230981 Database Version 3.1 hate Printed: 1/16/2008 NMR Page Page 9 or 10 • • Nutrient Management Recommendations Test YEAR j N (ibs/A) P205 (lbs/A) K20 (lbs/A) Mg (lbs/A) Mn (lbs/A) Zn (lbs/A) Cu (lbs/A) Lime (tons/A) Tract Field 4583 3 Req'd Nutrients 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App, Period 13.10 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Vance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 4.1 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 137 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tract Field 4583 4 Req'd Nutrients 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres I App. Period 9.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Com, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date 20.0 Tans 04-17-07 Manure 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rating 68 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 toval Field 4583 5 Rey'd Nutrients 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 App. Period 5.20 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 RYE Sample Date 16.5 Tons 04-17-07 Manure 180 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 P Removal Rating 561bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 1 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. 230991 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 /l6/2008 NMR Page Page 10 of 10 The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in Ibslacre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal. In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production . Required Soil Test Values Tract Field Crop pH Lime Recom, (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation 4484 2 Orchardgmss Hay- 5.3 1.0 70 None 259 None 4484 3 Small Grain, Silage 53 1.0 70 None 259 None 4484 3 Corn, Silage 5-3 1 0.0 70 None 259 None 4484 4 Small Grain, Silage 5.3 1.0 70 None 259 None 4484 4 Corn, Silage 5.3 0.0 70 None 259 None 4484 5 Small Grain, Silage 5.5 0.8 76 None 2" None 4484 5 Corn, Silage 5.5 0.0 76 None 244 None 4484 7 Small Grain, Silage 5.6 0.6 .62 None 120 None 4484 7 Corn, Silage 5.6 0.0 62 None 120 None 4490 1 17 Fescue Hay 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 18(N1) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 18(N2) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 1 "3) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 1"4) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 18(N5) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 18(N6) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 9()4 None 4490 18(N7) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 1 S(N8) Fescue Pasture 6.7 1 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 1 S(N9) Fescue Pasture 6-7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 20(Sl) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4490 20(S2) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 9o4 None 4490 20(S3) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.01 141 1 None 904 None 4490 20(S4) Fescue Pasture 1 6.7 1 0.01 141 1 None 904 None - --------------------------------- ---------------------- .-....------------..--------------------------------------------------------•--- ... ---- ----- ------ -- 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 STV Page Page I of 2 s �w • Required Soil Test Values Tract Field Crop pH Lime Recom. (tonslacre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation 4490 20(S5) Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 141 None 904 None 4564 1 Small Grain, Silage 6.3 0.0 136 None 573 None 4564 1 Corn, Silage 6.3 0.0 136 None 573 None 4564 2 Small Grain, Silage 6.1 0.0 103 None 415 None 4564 2 Corn, Silage 6.1 0.0 103 None 415 None 4564 5 Small Grain, Silage 6.1 0.0 105 None 497 None 4564 5 Corn, Silage 6.1 0.0 105 None 497 None 4564 6 Fescue Pasture 6.1 0.0 105 None 497 None 4565 1 Fescue Pasture 5.9 0.0 78 None 325 None 4565 2 Small Grain, Silage 5.9 0.0 78 None 325 None 4565 2 Cam, Silage 5.9 0.0 78 None 325 None 4565 3 Small Grain, Silage 5.7 1 0.5 62 None 297 None 4565 3 Corn, Silage 5.7 0.0 62 None 297 None 4565 4 Small Grain, Silage 5.7 0:5 62 None 297 None 4565 4 Corn, Silage 5.7 0.0 62 None 297 None 4565 5 Small Grain, Silage 5.7 0.5 62 None 297 None 4565 5 Corn, Silage 5.7 0.0 62 None 297 None 4565 6 Small Grain, Silage 5.7 0.5 62 None 297 None 4565 6 Corn, Silage 5.7 0.0 62 None 297 None 4583 ' 3 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 127 None 747 None 4583 4 Small Grain, Silage 6.5 0.0 127 None 747 None 4583 4 Cam, Silage 6.5 0.0 127 None 747 None 4583 5 Small Grain, Silage 6.3 0.0 102 None 442 None 4583 5 Corn, Silage 6.3 0.0 102 None 442 None - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------• ---------------------------------------------------••----- 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 STV Page Page 2 of 2 • �J 0 a: The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero. Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity. Available Waste Storage Capacity Source Name I Williams Da' (Liquid Only) Design Storage Capacity (Days) Start Date 911 180 Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity (Days) 1 1 149 1 2 141 1 3 171 1 4 180 1 5 180 L 6 180 1 7 149 1 8 118 1 9 149 1 10 179 1 I 180 I 12 149 * Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month. --- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 Capacity Page Page I of 1 • L-1 Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is prohibited. 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons'per acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips). 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance). 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies. -.-...---..- ... ............... 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 Specification Page I 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the soil surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. 10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter -for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters. 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ..-----. 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 Specification Pa,e 2 0. 0 17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge. 18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained foroptimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application .records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (S) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/16/2008 Specification Pape 3 • • Crop Notes The following crop note applies to field(s): 18(N1), 18(N2), 18(N3), 18(N4), 20(S1), 20(S2), 20(S3), 20(S4), 20(S5), 6 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Piedmont,'tail fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 301b/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 18(NS), 18(N6), 18(N7), 18(N8), 18(N9), 3 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Ib/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for bay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. ...................................................----------- - -.................................. • ... - ...................... 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 5 The following crop note applies to field(s): 2,' 5, 6 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 5 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting -and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. 23098t Database Version 3.1 Date printed: 01-16-2008 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 5 The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a siarter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 17 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 Ib/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. --------- --•---------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ -------- 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printc& 01-16-2008 Crop Note Page Page 3 of • Cl Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 5, 6 In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications, in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 5 Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2 " deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-16-2008 Crop Note Page Page 4 of 5 The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate,by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 2 Orchardgrass: No Comment ................... .....---------- --- -----...-....-....------------......------....------------------------------------------------------ 230981 Database Version 3.1 Date Printcd: 01-16-2008 Crop Note Page Page 5 of 5 • • Prime and Other Important Farmlands Randolph County, North Carolina -7 Map Map unit name Farmland classification symbol Ap8 Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes All areas are prime farmland CcB Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes All areas are prime farmland CeB2 Cecil sandy day loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded All areas are prime farmland HeB Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes VaB Vance sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes CCC Cecil sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes HeC Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes Mac Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes VaC Vance sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes ChA Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded All areas are prime farmland All areas are prime farmland Farmland of statewide importance Farmland of statewide importance Farmland of statewide Importance Farmland of statewide importance Prime farmland if drained and either. protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 15 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 05/08/2007 Page 1 0 Map Unit Description (Brief) Randolph County, North Carolina [Only those map units that have entries for the selected description categories are included in this report] Map unit: ApB Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Well suited Management concerns: Erodibilffy and soil fertility Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity Map unit: CcB - Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Well suited Management concerns: Soil fertility and erodibility Management measures and considerations - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity Map unit: CcC - Cecil sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Pasture -well suited, hayland-suited Management concerns: Erodibility, equipment use, and soil fertility Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - The slope may limit the use of equipment in the steeper areas during the harvest of hay crops - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Survey Area Version: 16 Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 1 • • Map Unit Description (Brief) Randolph County, North Carolina Map unit: Ce82 - Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Well suited Management concerns: Erodibility and: soil fertility Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity Map unit: ChA - Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Frequently flooded Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Poorly suited Management concerns: Flooding and wetness Management measures and considerations - Harvesting hay crops as soon as possible helps to reduce the risk of damage from flooding - Flooding may be a hazard for livestock - Preventing overgrazing or preventing grazing when the soil is too wet helps to prevent soil compaction, decreased productivity, and a rough soil surface Map unit: HeS - Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Well suited Management concems: Erodibility, soil fertility, and wetness Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture -'Preventing overgrazing or preventing grazing when the soil is too wet helps to prevent soil compaction, decreased productivity, and a rough soil surface USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 2 0 Ol Map Unit Description (Brief) Randolph County, North Carolina Map unit: HeC - Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability. Well suited Management concerns. Erodibility, soil fertility, and wetness Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - Rotational grazing and a well planned dipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity - Preventing overgrazing or preventing grazing when the so# is too wet helps to prevent soil compaction, decreased productivity, and a rough soil surface Map unit: MaC - Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Pasture -well suited, hayland-suited Management concerns: Erodibility, equipment use, and soil fertility Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - The slope may limit the use of equipment in the steeper areas during the harvest of hay crops - Applying time and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase. productivity Map unit: VaB -,Vance sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Well suited Management concerns: Erodibility and soil fertility Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 3 i 0' Map Unit Description (Brief) Randolph County, North Carolina Map unit: VaC - Vance sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Description category: Pasture and hayland Pasture and hayland suitability: Pasture -well suited; hayland-suited Management concerns: Erodibility, equipment use, and soil fertility Management measures and considerations - Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to reduce the hazard of erosion and increase germination - The slope may limit the use of equipment in the steeper areas during the harvest of hay crops - Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain pastures and increase productivity. - Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests increases the availability of plant nutrients and maximizes productivity when establishing, maintaining, or renovating hayland and pasture USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 4 Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) Randolph County, North Carolina [Minor map unit components are excluded from this report] Map unit: ApB - Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Component: Appling (83%) The Appling component makes up 83 percent of the map unit_ Slopes are 2 to 6 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high., Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: CcB - Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Component: Cecil (85%) The Cecil component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. it is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: CcC - Cecil sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Component: Cecil (85%) The Cecil component, makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: CeB2 - Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded Component: Cecil, moderately eroded (85%) The Cecil, moderately eroded component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on interfluves, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/0712008 Page 1 Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) Randolph County, North Carolina Map unit: ChA Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded Component: Chewacla (85%) The Chewacla component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent This component is on flood plains, valleys. The parent material consists of loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is somewhat poorly drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is frequently flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 15 inches during January, February, March, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 4w. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: He8 - Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Component: Helena (90%) The Helena component makes up 90 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 6 percent. This component is on ridges, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 24 inches during January, February, March, April, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: HeC - Helena sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes Component: Helena (75%) The Helena component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 6 to 10 percent. This component is on hillslopes on ridges, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is moderately well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. A seasonal zone of water saturation is at 24 inches during January, February, March, April, December. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: MaC - Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Component: Mecklenburg (85%) The Mecklenburg component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on hillslopes on ridges, uplands. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase and/or gneiss. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink -swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation ,Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 2 Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) Randolph County, North Carolina Map unit: VaB - Vance sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes - Component: Vance (85%) The Vance component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 8 percent. This component is on interRuves, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydrrc criteria. Map unit: VaC - Vance sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Component: Vance (85%) The Vance component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 8 to 15 percent. This component is on hillslopes on ridges, uplands. The parent material consists of saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately low. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink -swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 3 Nonirrigated Yields by Map Unit Component Randolph County, North Carolina [Yields are those that can be expected under a high level of management. They are for nonirrigated areas. Absence of a yield indicates that the soil is not suited to the crop or the crop generally is not grown on the soil] Map symbol Land Corn silage Oats Tall fescue Wheat and soil name capability Tons Bu Tons Bu ApB: Appling 2e 24.50 108 5.40 64 CcB: Cecil 2e 22.00 98 4.80 57 CcC: Cecil 3e 18.40 82 4.00 48 CeB2: Cecil, moderately eroded 2e 20.00 88 4.30 52 ChA: Chewacla 4w 28.00 110 4.50 65 Wehadkee, undrained 6w — -- — — HeB: Helena 2e 16.00 83 3.90 49 Worsham; undrained 5w --- --- -- --- HeC: Helena 3e 14.70 78 3.70 46 MaC: Mecklenburg 3e 15,20 68 3.60 40 VaB: Vance 2e 17.00 81 4.30 48 Vac: Vance 3e 16.10 76 4.00 45 USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Dale: 01/07/2008 Page 1 Agricultural Disposal of Wastewater by Irrigation and Overland Flow Randolph County, North Carolina (The Information in this table Indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the potential limitation. The columns that identify the rating class and limiting features show no more than five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have additional limitations. This report shows only the major soils in each map unit] Disposal of Overland flow Pct. wastewater of wastewater Map symbol of by Irrigation and soil name map unit Rating class and Rating class and limiting features Value limiting features Value ApB: Appling 83 Somewhat limited Very limited Low adsorption 0.29 Seepage 1.00 Too acid 0.21 Low adsorption 0.29 Too steep for surface 0.08 Too acid 0.21 application CcB: Cecil 85 Somewhat limited Very limited Low adsorption 0.53 Seepage 1.00 Too steep for surface 0.32 Low adsorption 0.53 application Too acid 0.07 Too acid 0.07 Ccc: Cecil 85 Very limited Very limited Too steep for surface 1.00 Seepage 1.00 application Too steep for surface 1.00 Too steep for 0.78 application sprinkler application Low adsorption 0.53 Low adsorption 0.53 Too acid 0.07 Too acid 0.07 CeB2: Cecil, moderately eroded 85 Somewhat limited Very limited Too acid 0.77 Seepage 1.00 Low adsorption 0.65 Too acid 0.77 Too sleep for surface 0.32 Low adsorption 0.65 application GhA: Chewacla 85 Very limited Very limited Depth to saturated 1.00 Flooding 1.00 zone Depth to saturated 1.00 Flooding 1.00 zone Too acid 0.21 Seepage 1.00 Too acid 0.21 USDA Natural Resources Surrey Area Version: 1& Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date: 01/07/2008 Page 1 f • • Agricultural Disposal of Wastewater by Irrigation and Overland Flow Randolph County, North Carolina Map symbol and soil name Pct• of map unit Disposal of wastewater by irrigation Overland flow of wastewater Rating class and Value Rating Gass and Value limiting features limiting features HeB: Helena 90 Very limited Very limited Slow water movement 1.00 Seepage 1.00 Depth to saturated 0.99 Depth to saturated 0.99 zone zone Too acid 0.21 Too acid 0.21 Too steep for surface 0.08 application HeQ Helena 75 Very limited Very limited Slow water movement 1.00 Seepage 1.00 Too steep for surface 1.00 Depth to saturated 0.99 application zone Depth to saturated 0.99 Too steep for surface 0.22 zone application Too acid 0.21 Too acid 0.21 Too steep for 0.10 sprinkler application Mac: Mecklenburg 85 Very limited Very limited Too steep for surface 1.00 Seepage 1.00 application Too steep for surface 1.00 Slow water movement 1.00 application Too steep for 0.78 sprinkler application Va B: Vance 85 Very limited Very limited Slow water movement 1.00 Seepage 1.00 Too acid 0.91 Too acid 0.91 Too steep for surface 0.32 application Vac; Vance 85 Very limited Very limited Too steep for surface 1.00 Seepage 1.00 application Too steep for surface 1.00 Slow water movement 1.00 application Too acid 0.91 Too acid 0.91 Too steep for 0.78 sprinkler application USDA Natural Resources Survey Area Version: 16 Conservation Service Survey Area Version Date; 01/07/2008 Page 2 i Mortality Management Methods {check which method(s) are being implemented) © Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water. 1( Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7. ❑ Complete incineration ❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal.pit of a size and design approved by the Department of Agriculture. ❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached) December 18, 1996 damage. a. Contractors Name: b. Contractors Address:C. c_ Contractors Phone: 6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc. a. Name: 5 Al..,, K r r b. Phone: - 6 ` q(330, 318 7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with release of wastes from happening again. 3 December 18, 1996 o�� W A ❑ `C -- -- [,�%IFr) October 1, 2004 , +. kept, of EHNR Jeanette Williams Williams Dairy 3385 Williams Dairy Road Liberty NC 27298 Dear Jeanette Williams: Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director r-.w.. Division of Water Quality OCT 0 1 2004 Regionai C)j iCrc Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC760050 Williams Dairy Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Randolph County On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733 (Session Law 2003-28). In accordance with your application received on April 15, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jeanette Williams, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC760050 which expires October 1, 2004. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Williams Dairy, located in Randolph County, with an animal capacity of no greater than an annual average of 250 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until Septembe 30, 2009, Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity wr itions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is inaccurate you will -need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed. Aquifer Protection Section -Animal Feeding Operations Unit 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 Phone: 919-733-32211 FAX: 919-71M5881 Internet: h2o,enr,state,nc,us An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper NorrhCarolina ,Vvaturallff The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility. Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143- 215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. If you .wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration. This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. This facility is located in a county covered by our Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (336) 771-4600. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at (919) 715-6698. Sincerely, for Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000) cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) Winston-Salem Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section Randolph County Health Department Randolph County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File AWC760050 APS Central Files �oF w A rFRQ �O G D 'C Jeanette Williams Williams Dairy 3385 Williams Dairy Road Liberty NC 27298 Dear Jeanette Williams: Michael F. Easley, Governor-, r William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director Division of Water Quality May 1, 2003 Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC760050 Williams Dairy Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Randolph County On April 28, 2003, .the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit. In accordance with your application received on April 15, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jeanette Williams, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of . this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC760050 which expired on April 30, 2003. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of ariimaIwaste from the Williams Dairy, located in Randolph County, with an animal capacity of no greater than an annual average of 250 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed. The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility. �ENER Non -Discharge Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Customer Service Center An Equal Opportunity Action Employer Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu Telephone (919)733-5083 Fax (919)715-6048 Telephone 1-877-623-6748 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted areo of a spray field. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143- 215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration. This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. This facility is located in a county covered by our Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (336) 7714600. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at (919) 733-5083 ext. 363. Sincerely, v for Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000) cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)Dept, of EHNR Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section Randolph County Health Department MAy 19 2003 Randolph County Soil and Water Conservation District - Permit File AWC760050 Winston-Salem NDPU Files . Regional Office, 14 Nil,". lent Management Plan For Anima? Vi aste Utilization This plan has been prepared for: Willliams Dairy Jeanette Williams 338 Williams Dairy Road Liberty, NC 27298 (336) 622-.4762 09-1 0-200? This plan has been developed b 7 Jerry Raynor USDA-NRCS 241 Sunset Avenue, Suite !OS Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan. Signature (owner} Date Signature (manager or producer) 16ate This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resour nservati ice or the standard of practices adopted by.the Soil and W. er C n.- ' ommission. Plan Approved B • /a PP • Y echnic Speciaiist Signature Date ............ .............. 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 09-10-2002 Cover Page 0140-pc�5 6 40?y N N Ntjtrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following source(s)- Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan. U6 Williams Dairy (Liquid Only) waste gc.,erated 343,250 gals/year by a 250 animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Lagoon I:iquid operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 120 days. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 8I4 Incorporated 1265 Injected 1369 Irrigated 866 Actual PAN Applied (Pounds) Actual Volume Applied (Gallons) Volume Surplus/Deficit (Gallons) Year 1 1,056.48 420,191 -76,941 U9 Williams Dairy (Solids Only) waste generated 4,200.00 tons/year by a 250 animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid operation. Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year Broadcast 18060 Incorporated 23940 Injected NIA Irrigated NIA Actual PAN Applied (Pounds) Actual Quantity Applied (Tons) Surplus/Deficit (Tons) Year 1 51,800.90 12,371.42 -8,171.42 This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42 entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source. Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source. 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 09-10-2002 Source Page 1 of I 00. 1 N Narrative This 250 head dairy operation uses 8.52 acres under solid set irrigation for the disposal of the liquid . waste from the storage lagoon. The remaining waste is applied by broadci sE using a honeywagon. The WUP designates fields for irrigation and broadcast. Waste is scraped from the lot inot an open stack with the solids seperated using pickets. The liquid waste from this operation is stored in the waste storage pond. Some of the gun set on field 20 wil be thrown beyond the edges of the filed and into the woods. Since Williams Dairy owns this porperty, this will be ok, according to Jerry Pate, MRCS Civil Engineering Technician. Field designations for irrigated fields in this plan is based on owner input. Fields 18 and 20 are used for irrigation. The information in parenthesis refers first to the owner designation - then the number of the hydrant as specified in the irrigation plan provided by GRA-MAC Irrigation. VOLUME CALCULATIONS FOR DISPOSAL (User Defined Sources) 250 cows x 1.96 cu. ft/cow/day x 120 days of storage x 100% confinement = 58,800 cu. ft. of storage needed for waste generated from milk cows for the time they are on the lot. TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED: 58,800 cu. ft. for 120 days of storage of all waste generated for all animals. (Excluding storage needed for lot runoff from rain events and storms) SOLIDS: 250 cows--58,800 cu. ft (total waste produced for time on the lot for 120 days). x 1.5 cu. ft./cow/day (solids) / 1.96 cu. ft./cow/day (total) = 45,000 cu. ft. (solids for I20 days) (45,000 cu. ft. (cows) x 3 (no. of 120 day periods in a year = 135,000 cu. ft./yr 135,000 cu. ft./yr x 62.4 lbs/cu. ft.=8,424,000 lbs./yr 8,424,000 lbs./yr. / 2000 lbs./ton = 4212 tons/yr. 4212 tons/yr. / 250 head = 16.8 tons/bead/yr. of solids LIQUIDS: COWS: 58,800 cu. ft. (total waste produced for time on lot for 120 days). x 0.46 cu. A./cow/day (liquid) / 1.96 cu. ft./cow/day (total = 13,800 cu. ft. (liquids for 120 days) { 13,800 cu. ft. (cows) x 3 (no. of 120 day periods in a year) = 41,400 cu. ft./yr. 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 09-10-2002 Narrative Page I of 2 N N arrative 41,400 cu. ft./yr. x 7.48 gals./cu:a. = 309,672 gals./yr. 309,672 gals./yr. (from animals) 33,598 gals./yr. (lot run-off) (5889/open drystack, 9592/lot runoff, 5500/25yr lot runoff, 12,617/25 yr pond surface) 33,598 galsJ250 head = 1373 gals./head/yr. of liquids ................. .......... 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 09-10-2002 Narrative Page 2 of 2 a N Theta bleshown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop lit the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, whel-e available. Planned,' irot3s Summary Tract Field Leaching Index (LI) Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE 4484 1 N/A Vance Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons Corn, Silage 15.7 Tons 4484 2 N/A Vance Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons Corn, Silage 15.7 Tons 4484 3 N/A Vance Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons Corn, Silage 15.7 Tons 4484 4 NIA Vance Small Grain, Silage 6.8 Tons Corn, Silage 15.3 Tons 4484 5 N/A Cecil Small Grain, Silage 11.0 Tons Cum, Silage 23.0 Tons 4484 6 N/A Chewacla-P Small Grain, Silage *6.0 Tons Corn, Silage 28.0 Tons 4484 7 N/A Vance Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons Com, Silage 15.7 Tons 4490 11 N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.7 Tons 4490 16 N/A Vance Fescue Pasture 4,3 Tons 4490 17 NIA Vance Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons 4490 8 N1-6 N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3,8 Tons 4490 8(N2-7) N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 4490 8 3-8 N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 4490 (N4-10) NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 4490 (N5-11) NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 4490 (N6-12) N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 4490 8(N7-9) N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 4490 (N8-13) N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 4490 19 N/A Vance Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons 4490 20(S1-l) NIA Helena Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 4490 20(S2-2) N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 4490 20(S3-3) N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 4490 20(S4-4) N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 4490 20(S5-5) N/A Helena Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 4564 1 NIA Apeling Small Grain, Silage 11.0 Tons Corn, Silage 24.0 Tons 4564 2 N/A Cecil Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons Cqm, Silage 20.0 Tons 4 i 1 1 I s . .... ..... ................ ..... .. ,. ... .. .......... ... .. ..... .,.. ... _..... .....--.., .. _.... -..... 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 09-10-2002 PCS Page 1 of 2 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data. a N Planned Crom Surnmary Tract I Field Leaching Index (LI) Soil Series L Crop Sequence RYE 4565 1 N/A Applina Small oiain, Silage 11.0 Tons Cam, Silage 24.0 Tons 4565 ` 3 N/A Cecil Small Grain, Silage 9,6 Tons Corn, Silage 20.0 Tons 4565 4 N/A Cecil Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons Corn, Silage 20.0 Tons 4565 5 N/A Cecil Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons Com, Silage 20.0 Tons 4565 6 N/A Cecil Small Grain, Silage 11.0 Tons Corn, Silage 23.0 Tons 4583 1 N/A Helena Small Grain, Silage 7.8 Tons Com, Silage 14.7 Tons 4583 2 N/A Helena Small Grain, Silage 7.8 Tons Com, Silage 14.7 Tons 4583 3 NIA Helena Small Grain, Silage 8.2 Tons Com, Silage 15.4 Tons 4583 5 NIA Mecklenburg Small Grain, Silage 8.3 Tons Com, Silage 17.5 Tons 4583 7 N/A Apeling Small Grain, Silage 1 I onsCom, Silage f0T 24ons LI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance Low potential to contribute to None 2 soluble nutrient leaching below the root zone. = 2 & Moderate potential to contribute to Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. < = 10 soluble nutrient leaching below the root zone. High potential to contribute to Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soluble nutrient leaching below the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be > 10 root zone. considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers(391). .... ............... ..................... 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 09-10-2002 PCS Page 2 of 2 NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data, The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan forthis operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake. This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation. Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if anirOl waste is being utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. Waste Utilization Table Year 1 t Tract Field Source I.D. Soil Series Total Acre Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd Comm. Fert. Nutrient Applied Res. (1bs/A) Applic. I Method Manure PA Nutrient Applied Liquid Manure. Applied (acre) Solid. Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (Field) N N N lbs/A 1000 vaVA tons 1000 gals tcn^ - --4484 1 U9 Vance 7.20 7.20 Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 78 0 0 Broad, 78 0.00 18 0.00 13`i.60 --4484 1 U9 Vance 7.20 7.20 Corn, Silage 15.7 Tons 2115-6/30 171 0 0 Broad. 171 0.00 40 0.00 2902 -4484 2 U9 Vance 7.50 7.50 Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 78 0 0 Broad. 78 0.00 18 0.00 136.04 --4484 2 U9 Vance 7.501 7.50 Corn, Silage 15.7 Tons 2/15-6/30 171 0 0 Broad. 171 0.00 40 i1-00 298.25 --4484 3 U9 Vance 4.30 4.30 Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons 911-3/31 78 0 0 Broad. 78 0.00 18 0,01' 78.00 -4484 3 U9 Vance 4.30 4.30 Com, Silage 15.7 Tons 2115-6130 171 0 0 Broad. 17E 0.00 40 0.00 171.00 --4484 4 U9 Vance 7,30 7.30 Small Grain, Silage 6.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 75 0 0 Broad. 75 0.00 17 0.00 127.32 --4484 4 U9 Vance 7.30 7.30Com,Silage 15.3Tons 2/15-6/30 167 0 0 Broad. 167 0.00 39 0.00 i83.51 -4484 U9 Cecil 8.20 8.20 Small Grain, Silage 11.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 122 0 0 Broad. 122 0.00 28 0,00 2!:. 65 -4484 ECecil 8.20 8.20 Com, Silage 23.0 Tons 2/15-6/30 251 0 0 Broad. 251 0.00 58 0,00 478.•.' - - --- ---- - --- -------------------------------------------------.-...------------------------------- ---- ... -- .. ..- 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 9/10/02 W[TT Page 1 WaoeTTtlli7.ntion Tahle Vnar 1 Tract Field Source I.D. Soil Series Total Acre Use. Acres Crop RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd Conun. Fert. Nutrient Applied Res. (lbs/A) Applic. Method Manure PA Nutrient Applied Liquid Manure Applied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied (F:e;d) tons N N N Ibs/A 1000 1/A tons 1000 als --4484 6 U9 Chewacla-P 8.90 8.90 Small Grain, Silage *6.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 *64 0 0 Broad. 64 0.00 15 0.00 132.46 -4484 6 U9 Chewacla-P 8.90 8.90 Com, Silage 28.0 Tons 2115-6/30 291 0 0 Broad. 291 0.00 68 0.00' 602.29 --4484 7 U9 Vance 9.30 9.30 Small Grain, Silage 7.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 78 0 0 Broad, 78 0.00 18 0.00 168.70 -4494 7 N/A Vance 9.30 9.30 Corn, Silage 15.7 Tans 2/15-6/30 171 0 0 NIA 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 4-490 11 U9 Helena 5.40 5.40 Fescue Pasture 3.7 Tons 8/1-7/31 120 Oi 0 Broad. 120 0.00 28 0.00 350.70 4490 16 U9 Vance 10.60 10.60 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 143 01 0 Broad. 143 0.00 33 0.00 352.51 4490 17 U9 Vance 5.70 5.70 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 143 0 0 Broad. 143 0.00 33 0.00 189.56 4490 8(N1-6) U6 Helena 5.44 0.68 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/I-7/31 124 0 01 brig. 124 49.09 0 33.38 0.00 4490 8(N2-7) U6 Helena 5.44 0.68 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 brig. 124 49.09 0 .3.38 0.00 4490 8(N3-8) U6 Helena 5.44 0.68 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 Irrig. 124 49.09 0 33."3 0.00 4490 (N4-10) U6 Helena 5.44 0.68 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 Irrig. 124 49.09 0 33.3E 0.00 4490 (N5-11) U6 Helena 5.44 0.68 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 Irrig. 124 49.09 0 33.38 0.00 4490 (N6-12) U6 Helena 5.44 0.68 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 Irrig. .124 49.09 0 33.38 0.00 4490 8(N7-9) U6 Helena 5.44 0.68 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 trig. 124 49.09 0 33.38 0.00 4490 (N8-13) U6 Helena 5.44 0.68 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 brig- 124 49.09 0 33.38 2-00 4490 19 U9 Vance 8.70 8.70 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 143 0 0 Broad. 143 0.00 33 0.00 28 i 32 4490 0(SI-1) U6 Helena 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 Irrig. 124 49.09 0 30.24 UAAI 4490 0(S2-2) U6 Helena 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 Irrig. 124 49.09 0 30.24 0.00 4490 0(S3-3) U6 Helena 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 Irrig. 124 49.09 0 �� 24 0.00 4490 O(S44)1 U6 Helena 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 01 0 Broad. 124 52.23 0 32. L� 0.00 4490 0(S5-5) U6 I Helena 3.08 0.62 Fescue Pasture 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 124 0 0 brig. 124 49.09 0 30.24 t 0.00 4564 1 U9 Appling 6.00 6.00 Small Grain, Silage 11.0 Tans 9/1-3/31 122 0 D Broad. i22 0.00 28 0.00 170.23 - - - --- ----------------- ---- ----------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- --------- ------.............................. ............ ... 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 9/10/02 WUI' Page t� Wn.gtP T Ftili7atinn TnNIP V.--1 Tract Field Source LD. Soil Series Total Acre Use. Acres Croo RYE Appiic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd Comm. Fert Nutrient Applied Res. (Ibs/A) Applic. I Method Manure PA Nutrient Applied Liquid Manure Applied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Ligv;d Manure Applied (Field) Solid Manure Applied t . (Field) N I N N Ibs/A 1000 al/A tons 1000 gals tLns 4564 I U9 Appling 6.00 6.00 Corn, Silage 24.0 Tons 2/15-6/30 262 0 0 Broad. 262 0.00 61 0.00 365.58 4564 2 U9 Cecil 22.20 22.20 Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 107 0 0 Broad. 107 0.00 25 0.00 55-.' 1 4564 2 U9 Cecil 22.20 22.20 Corn, Silage 20.0 Tons 2/15-6/30 218 0 0 Broad- 218 0.00 51 O.00l 1,125.4: 4565 1 U9 Appling 16.40 16.40 Small Grain, Silage 11.0 Tons 9/1-3/31 122 0 0 Broad. 122 0.D0 28 0.00 465.30 4565 1 U9 Appling 16.40 16.40 Com, Silage 24.0 Tons 2/15-6/30 262 0 0 Broad. 262 0.00 61 0.00 999.24 4565 3 U9 Cecil 4.00 4.00 Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 107 0 0 Broad. 107 0,00 25 0.00 99.53 4565 3 U9 Cecil 4.00 4.00 Corn, Silage 20.0 Tons 2115-6/30 218 O 0 Broad. 218 0,00 51 0.00 202.79 4565 4 U9 Cecil 13.70 13.70 Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 107 0 0 Broad. 107 0.00 25 0.00 340.90 4565 4 U9 Cecil 13.70 13.70 Corn, Silage 20.0 Tons 2/15-6/30 218 0 0 Broad. 218 0,00 51 0.00 694.55 4565 5 U9 Cecil 3.40 3.40 Small Grain, Silage 9.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 107 0 0 Broad. 107 0.00 25 0.00 84.60 4565 5 U9 Cecil 3.40 3.40 Corn, Silage 20.0 Tons 2/15-6/30 218 0 0 Broad. 218 0.00 51 0.00 172.37 4565 6 U9 Cecil 11.50 11.50 Small Grain, Silage 11.0 Tons 9/1-3131 122 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0 ;V-00 0.00 4565 6 U9 Cecil 11.50 11.50 Com, Silage 23.0 Tons 2115-6/30 251 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0 O.t-? 0.00 4583 ! 1 U9 Helena 5.60 5.60 Small Grain. Silage 7.8 Tons 911-3/31 84 0 0 Broad. 84 0.00 20 0.00 i 109.39 4583 1 U9 Helena 5.60 5,60 Corn, Silage 14.7 Tons 2/15-6130 157 0 0 Broad. 157 0.00 37 0.00 204.46 4583 2 U9 Helena 4.20 4.24 Small Grain, Silage 7.8 Tans 9/1-3/31 84 0 0 Broad. 84 0.00 20 0.00 82.05 4583 • 2 U9 Helena 4.20 4.20 Corn, Silage 14.7 Tons 2/15-6/30 157 0 0 Broad. 157 0.00 .371 0,00 1.53.35 4583 3 U9 Helena 13.90 13.90 Small Grain, Silage 8.2 Tons 9/1-3/31 89 0 0 Broad. 89 0.00 21 0.00 237.69 4583 3 U9 Helena 13.90 13.90 Corn, Silage 15.4Tons 2/15-6/30 165 0 0 Broad. 165 0.00 38 0.00 5K, 36 4583 5 U9 Mecklenburg 5.30 5.30 Small Grain, Silage 8.3 Tons 9/1-3/31 921 0 0 Broad. 92 0.00 21 0.00 113.E :' 4583 5 U9 Mecklenburg 5.30 530 Com, Silage 1 17.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 191 0 4 Broad. 191 0.00 44 0.00 235.41 , 4583 7 U9 Appling 10.64 10.60 Small Grain. Silage I I.O Tons 9/1-3/31 122 0 D Broad, 122 0.00 28 J4 300.74 ........ . --- ---- -- -------- --- ----- --- -------- ------.•..------------------------•----------•--------...................................-_...... -- -------------- -------------- 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 9/10/02 WUT Page 3 I Wa.qte Tltili7atinn Tnhle VPar 7 Tract Field Source D. Soil Series Total Acre Use, P Acres Croz RYE Applic. Period Nitrogen PA Nutrient Req'd Comm. Fert. Nutrient Applied Res- (Ibs/A) Applic. Method Manure PA Nutrient Applied Liquid Manure Applied (acre) Solid Manure Applied (acre) Liquid Manure Applied (Meld) Sore: Manure Appliee (Field) N N N lbs/A 1000 aVA tons 1000 gMS . tans 4583 7 U9 Appling 1 10.60 10.60 Com, Silage 1 24.0 Tons 2/15-6/30 2621 0 0 Broad. 1 262 0.001 61 0-00 , . 645.85 Total Applied, 1000 gallons 420.19 Lagoon Liquids Total Produced, 1000 gallons 343.25 Balance, 1000 gallons -76.94 Total Applied, tons 12,i)4,' 53 Manure Solids Total Produced, tons 4,200.i'1 Balance, tons -7,846.53 ` Notes: I . In the tract column, symbol • means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol " means user entered data. t3 ----- ---------------------- I --------------------------- -------------- ---------- --------------------------------------------- ----- ---- ---------- .... ... .. . I . .... . .......... 933680. Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 9/10/02 WUT Page 4 The Irrigation Application Factors for :.=h field in this plan are shown in the following table. infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system:; you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that maybe applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application event. . Imigation Application Factors 'tract Field Soil Series Application Rate (inchesthour) Application Amount (inches) 4490 18(Nl-6) Helena 0.20 0.96 4490 18(N2-7) Helena 0.20 0.96 4490 18(N3-8) Helena 0.20 0.96 4490 18(N4-10) Helena 0.20 0.96 4490 18(N5-I1) Helena 0.20 0.96 4490 18(N6-12) Helena 0.20 0.96 4490 18(N7-9) Helena 0.20 0.96 4490 18(N8-13) Helena 0.20 0.96 4490 20(SI-1) Helena 0.20 0.96 4490 20(S2-2) Helena 0.20 0.96 4490 20(S3-3) Helena 0.20 0.96 4490 20(S5-5) Helena 0.201 0.96 .............................................................. ,..... I...g .. 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 09-10-2002 IAF Page I of I so M The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero. Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity. Available Waste Storatse Canacitv Source Name I Williams Dairy (Liquid Onl Design Storage Capacity a s Start Date 9/15 120 Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity (Days) 1 1 89 1 2 120 1 3 120 1 4 120 1 5 89 1 6 59 1 7 28 1 8 0 1 9 11 1 10 69 1 11 84 1 12 53 NOMMENOMENERNMr * Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month. .................... ... _...... ..................... 933680 Database Version 2.0 '' .,e Pfintcd.- 09-10-2002 Capacity Page I ,of I Required Specifications For Animal Waste. Management 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is prohibited. 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to Iand eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 14 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips). 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance). 933b80 Database Version 2.0 Date :' iiited: 9/10/02 Sry t .ration Page 1 M 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the soil surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. 10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial. waters. 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 9/10/02 Specification Page 2 N N 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over=spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land.application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. 17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge. 18. if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A markeA will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. 933680 Database Vll , rion 2:0 Date Printcd ii 10/02 Specification Page 3 N M 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen. shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. ....... ... ......... .. --- .... . 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 9/10/02 Specification Page 4 N M Crop Notes The following crop note applies to field(s): 11, 18(N1-6), 18(N2-7), 18(N3-8), 18(N4-10), 18(N5-11), 18(N6-12), 18(N7-9), 18(N8-13), 20(S1-I), 20 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 601b/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. I to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. The following crop note applies to field(s): 16, 17, 19 Fescue: Piedmont Adaptation: Well -adapted. In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance. 933680 Database Versin . 2.0 Date Printed: 09-10-20C.2 Crop Note Page 1 of 5 N M Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains The following crop note applies to field(s): 6 In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees Fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage nceds about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the com. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees Fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. 933680 Dal :base Version 2.0 Date Printcu 09-10-2002 Crop Note Page 2 of 5 N N Corn Silage: Piedmont and.Mountains The following crop note applies to field(s): 5 In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies'to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply I0 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and . expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant 1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 Ibs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. p.. g 93365[I Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 09-10-2002 Cro Note Pa e 3 of 5 �1 L_ _A11j N Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains The following crop note applies to field(s): 6 In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 Ibs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3 Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. 933680 ©atabasP ", 4:!r;ion 2.0 Date Printed: 09-10-2002 Crop Note riv:. 4 of 5 N so Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains The following crop note applies to field(s): 5 In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply I0 to 12 lbs. N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains, small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting. Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest. 933680 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 09-10-2002 Ckop Note Page 5 of 5 ILI a Statr�-Zf North Carolin.'P.4 Department of Environm6t' and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality .lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director ot Ml • r NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES September 21, 2000 RECEIVED JEANETTE WILLIAMS N.C. Dept. ©f'EHNR WILLIAMS DAIRY 0 C T _ 2 2000 3385 WILLIAMS DAIRY ROAD LIBERTY NC 27299 Winston-Salem Recijr)rlal '}ff ir� Subject; Certificate of Coverage No. AQC760 510 Williams Dairy Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Randolph County Dear Ms. Williams: In accordance with your application received on September 12, 2000, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Jeanette Williams, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. This approval consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal rite om the Williams Dairy, located in Randolph County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 170 ilk and 20 dry cows; 30 heifers; and 30 calves, and the application to land as specified in the C 'fie Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMW). The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWW , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division. 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper i r 1 Certificate of Coverage C760050 Williams Dairy '� Page 2 This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on this process.- Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. The subject farm is located in the Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (336) 771-4600. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact Theresa Nartea at (919) 733-6083 ext. 375. Sinc ely, r err T. Stevens cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) RandoIphCounty Health Department Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section Randolph County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File NDPU Files Anin*4pcility and Permit d** Permit Number: AWC760050 Owner: Jeanette Williams Farm Name: Williams Dairy Street: 3385 Williams Dairy Road City, State: Liberty NC Zip: 27298 Telephone: (336) 622-4762 Facility Contact: Jeanette Williams State Reviewer: Theresa Nartea Type of Application: Existing / General / Original Date App Rcvd: 9/12/2000 End Stat App: 12/11/2000 Date Reviewed: 9/14/2000 Date Withdrawn: Date Returned: Date Denied: Date issued: Printed: 9/14/200 Region: Winston-Salem County: Randolph Lat:35.825 Long.79.9056 Type of Operation: Cattle Reg Comm Reqs: Reg Comm Rcvd: Add Info Reqs: Add Info Rcvd: Ot Ag Com Reqs: Ot Ag Com Rcvd: Comments: Herd is 50% confined: 50% pastured Predominantly waste is broadcast, only 9 of the 155 ac. are irrigated Crop N uptake is greater than PAN produced by animals September 7, 2000 Kerr T. Stevens North Carolina Division of Water Quality Water Quality Section Non -Discharge Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Dear Kerr, Enclosed in this mailing is the information that you requested for my application of an Animal Waste Operation General Permit to be completed. This information is being provided in response to the letter I received from your office in the letter dated July 11, 2000. I am providing the requested information in duplicate for my operation identified as Jeanette Williams, Williams Dairy; Facility Number: 76-50, Randolph County. As always, if you need additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, Jeanette Williams Enclosures (2) cc: Randolph SWCD State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Non -Discharge Permit Application Form (THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Pleas( review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1.1 Facility Name: Williams Dairy.___ 1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Jeanette Williams 1.3 Mailing address: 3385 Williams Dairy Road City, State: Liberty NC� _ Zip: 27298 Telephone Number (include area code): 3{ 36) 622-4762 _ 1.4 County where facility is located: Randolph 1.5 Facility Location (Directions from,nearest.major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a cop of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): 6 miles west of Liberty on the east side of Williams Dair Rd. # 24*0 .4y-5-4 1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Richard 1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): 1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 1/1/1948 1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): 2. OPERATION INFORMATION: 2.1 Facility No.: 66 (county number); 50 (facility number). 2.2 Operation Description: Cattle operation Dairy 250- Certified Design Capacity Is the above information correct? lzyes; = no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed. Type of Swine 0 Wean to Feeder 0 Feeder to Finish 0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow) 0 Farrow to Finish (# sow) No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals 0 Layer Other Type of Livestock on the farm: 0 Non -Layer 0 Turkey Type Cattle No. of Animal 0 Dairy 0 Beef _ No. of Animals: FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 76 - 50 —'► 00 0• 2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application system): 155 : Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 80 p 2.4 Number of lagoon storage pond (circle which is applicable): 5`Tor �cs nrd / bry STA(,k 2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? ,YES or 0please circle one) 2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or 0 (please circle one) 2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only) YES or NO (please circle one) What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? 3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each item. 3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal Waste Operations, 3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and field locations where animal waste is land applied; 3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the CAWMP for permitting purposes: 3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility. 3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.) 3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application. 3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field. 3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field. 3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP. 3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field. 3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP. 3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications. 3.3.10 A site schematic. 3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan. 3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted. 3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted. 3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted. 3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to your facility. 3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan. If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal. Applicants Initials FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 76 - 50 _4 •0 Facility Number: 76 - 50 Facility Name: Williams Dairy 4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: I, t&_.4rue,T%'E (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that this application for _1AJ1 Mi 96n 4 _ 7�w"l y (Facility name listed in question i.l) has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to 6e best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be retu to me as incomplete. ' f Signature _ g A) Date 5. MXNAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner) 1, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1) has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned as incomplete. Signature Date THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WATER QUALITY SECTION NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 733-5083 FAX NUMBER: (919) 733-0719 FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 76 - 50 _;, Antolaste Management Plan Cerfif e"Jon Name of Farm: wdY Facility No: --!—; 9 2_ Owner(s) Name:_ ., ,,.�,_. P LM I Phone No: 22- 4762 I � Mailing Addres, Farm Location: Latitude and Longitude: 41) Please attach a copy of a county road names, directions, milepost, etc.): w , Otleration Descri.tltion: Type of Sivine No. of Animals Z) Wean to Feeder O Feeder to Finish © Farrow to Wean !, O Farrow to Feeder D Farrow to Finish 0 Gilts ❑ Boars County Farm is located in: Bf -35"jw Intel with location identified and describe beloyv (Be Type of Poultry No. ofAnimals ❑ Layer ❑ Pullets Type of attle #QrDairy ❑ Beef road No. of Animals -250 Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals: Exi nA go —P Only i 5 t r Previous Desr ro t:.rr Qctt-. >;� ......... . Addiubnal Desi ii'Cn achy Tora1 Des�2n' ciir y s_. Acreage Available for Application: 1_�_ _ Required Acreage: r 60 Number of Lagoons Storage Ponds • Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3) Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one) If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one) Owner / Manager Agreement I (we) verif�y that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that (here must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from' lounging and beavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. ' The approved plan wiII be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer. r 1 , / . 1 l s Name of Land Signature: Name of Mantf Signature: ,46 r: if different from ow )-. If i — . / - Date:_ ` f !f Date: ^/ ' AWC -- August 1, 1997 { qkc-cal Specialist Certi Picalion I. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001- .0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically competent. II. Certification of Design A) Collection. Storage, Treatment System Check the appropriate box Existing facilitv_without to ro% (SD or VFJP) Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements. G New, expanded -or retrpfitted facility (SD). It`} Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection system bw ds, have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications. �R••••••••• 4Zi .,� •�FES51 •• • �' Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 61 Affiliation G Date Work Compl d: 9 Address (Agency): 5 c. one eli Signature: Date: B) Land Application Site (WUP) The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilizatW,rcen crop is suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates. CARQ��'�! ES Name of Technical Special st (Please Print): Affiliation SVeAO Date Work Comp IVA Address (Agency): 2 Phon Sign ature%.� 'Uc- Date. :� P•` C) Runoff Controls from Mterior Lots - Check the appropriate box ::1 Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC) This facility does not contain any exterior lots. Facility with exterior lots (RC) Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS. Name of Tech Affiliation Address (Agency): Signature: A%VC -- AuguA4, Sppciglisl (Please Print):, 2 Work Complefl;d' _ -,Phone No" Z?ZJ:k3Date:_ _9— u D). Application and H i 2ipTnent Cheek the .approprkue box 04D q n v withw ; 'rnt n (WUP or I) Animal waste application equipment specified+ in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as' necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for tinting of applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan). L New, expanded, or existing facility without existing ,v,1gc--aQnlication. c-ciuipm nt for son, v irrit, Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained. calibration and adjustment guidance arc contained as pan of the plan). ;1 New. CSVandcd. or CSisting facility_without zxistin, w--applicationquipnienL for land spreading ma u",1, snr,Umgntion. (WUP or I) Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste management plait; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan, atr rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing, of applications has been established; required buffers can be. maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan). 4 Name of Tech ical Specialist (Please Print): TLtso(1 (9r'6 hafK Affiliation rat - �At- i4r1Ji9 l erNOan✓ _Date Work Completed:__ Address (Agency) d Phone No. YY(P-99?-,2V C:n.,nr.,re• - , All n )%. . 4 . An n.,r-- 4, 4-4a E) Odor Control. Insect Control, iVlortality Iylanaaement and Emernencv Action Plan (SD.. Si, WUP. RC or I) The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management. Odor Control Checklist. an Insect Control Checklist. a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency -fiction Plan. Sources of both odors and insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency action Plan arc complete and can be implementeg4b"0*4acility. dame of Tec 1caI S ec'atl' t (Please Print): Affiliation D• to tiVor - Comple Address (Agency): /05 Phone I W. Signature: lee Date: F) Written Notice of New or Era inn Svtiine Farm r'-4,P��..•' The follo►ving signature block Is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that ems' toff+ fi �Yune 21, 1996. if the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last expanded I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners who awn property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is attached. Name of Land Owner: Signatu Name of Manager (if different from owner): Date: Signature: Date: AWC -- august 1, 19v7 3 1II. -Certification o nstallation 910 A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI) Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications. For existing facilities without retrofils, no certification is necessary. ��.��`'`I CAR" NxSSi�O,' Name of Tech nic4S peciap st, (Please Print): Work Com Address (Agency):, Signature: N B) Land Application Site (VW' Check the appropriate box ZThe cropping, system is in place on all land as specified in the anima] waste management plan. ZJ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan. G Also check this box if appropriate if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cle� of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosi Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): A.ffiliation_A622_4 Address (Agency): Signature:__ to Work Corn 2%Ze3 This following signature block is onto be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B above has been checked. I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM. Name of Land Owner: 11-1114- Signature: Date: Name of Manager (if different from owner):_ Signature: Date: AWC -- August 1, 1997 ' . C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (1:C:} 1 ` Facility with ex ccmft � �� echodi to niinimiz ff of pallutants from lounging grid lien a ,.; have been installed as specified An the plan. , Forfacilities without exterior lots, no certification Is necess(iry. Name of I chn' I Speci ist (PP)ease Print): Affiliation Date W rk Completet Address (Agent i o5 "Phone t '• . (Agency): �� r Signature• ` ` Date: it r / h Z7 03 .* .�� ••• h� D) Application and flandling11 -EguoKent InStallntion (WUP or Z) Check the apptopriate.b.lock tgf Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration and'adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as port of the plan. Z Animal waste -application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the. owner has.propused•leasing or third pasty application and has provided a signed convacr. equipment specified in the contract agrees with die requirements of the plaw. required butters can be maintaitied; calibration' and adjustment guidance have been provided to die owners and are contained as part of the plan. Z! Conditional- approval: Animal waste application ,and handling equipment specified in the plan has been purchased. and will be on site and installed by , (moath/day/year); there is adequate storage to 'hold the waste until- the equipment is installed and until' the waste can be land applied in accordance with the cropping system contained in die plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the tan. Name of Technical Specialist {Please Print):l QSo �. /�— ?►ftiliation teA- Iflac -ly- l _Date Work Completed: Address (Agency to AIC Phone Rio. 3�rp-ffe ->7 U Signature: Dste: �rq�gq The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D above has been checked:: I (we) certify that (we), have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as specifed'in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation from a Technical -Specialist within 15 calendar days following the bate specified in the conditional certification. 1 • (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a Violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) E0 an enforcement action from DE`'t. Fame of Land Owner: Signature: Date: Name of ylanager.(if different from owner): Signature: Date: E) Odor Control. Insect Control and N'lortality blanagerrient (SD. SI. WV.P. )�pR�''�., Metliods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed aV4 .��t�0V �'•r 1e mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed -and is ope43do 4 l�iJi� 9. 00 Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Non -Discharge Branch, Compliance Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and -to keep a copy in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan. 37 1 °xr''"" 77717 t+m�77 7 _•�, r. 3 s y ¢f'e i't, Y, q e t i 1F ry�',�� 3�"di� } } a a L C s frfi -,i: r F a s« �'_;,�, a;"i l rAI "35,;;r y >, t. s.-i0. re 4°x „� ,+� 5 w 3 e r t`•` 3� Y �'. ; s a * w x �t4 „r. s' "J .S4k 5. ,i;;� E+ ..bs' i la; i 3`,. " Ye `•':. �, -x 4.y`t .,^ -- •3^'* i . ..,,.4" s �vyJ q aI 3 , I ,, W ¢ � s.,:. e,:,,rk 3r Y k` ' "Y'' T E + n -taw s , �* � z 'k-;g.� ;�•: o for RD 01 a o r'`k a a 22 S �.....°�., 1✓ �' e5 E: i N w PIEDMONT GREG �.� t Uoc1�j1 0 �•_,,.„"r-^�' r '• :t a� ,,WAY'`"` 1 r3 ¢ ftq��gp� b... " (P1,01 GREEN �, 421 Y ti, r'T (2241) / �iQ� tc RD I o Al D CHURG4. ,•!.`i Ra ♦*1 < REDLANE ` , �` t1SJda NEP?.,, m d (2418) 4' PROVIDENCE � L� r"� z �1 , �;,� '`;,.� i(:- •..� :I)ODSOM t V (21 r4 `, 90 C �Fi• l2.:v ¢ `., IAKE i ✓ FREb c i Z�h1EB �mQQ...y`PO [Oy(, ; L.Z• $ :/ l. �I 1 J; (2113)ERRY } r r .J`��ti\=�0�� H i O'51 •, i x i �s RUN 1HkN S T y1pE>RaY MAC INEBERRY i ' nr ¢ ..HAWKSVIEW r 1�, ' a fi 7 �) A USE t ¢4 FOREST b w i 1•� �\ ^' m�� I k ' y h `y�.y �e� I ¢ z f•y�+ S;,—,WILt.ARD RD 2 Oq.�(�,.: 1C" 14 RD -i kF AY RD ; t M, l --A D {2PuaH qO,I, L SANDY .q v y N 49 b r (246y 3" �. ._.... a a t , _ AOk (RcaR 421 P. (25a3) NPE4 al I RD µ�s ASTALEY x 40j ►5+ c°` �...... ( I c' 1' Ao R s ] q rL t3f ...g ..... „,.,,......... 2.......� 22 •� � is i .. RDySORG� 48 ......,.. �y� ...,...... ;::P:r r . -. .% a �r •� 6 .,,- ��' � . It,44, VI AL �� r F ANK�I :1.: E +...•... �..,, g RGBY e�3 I' ' RANODIPM ,`j 1 JoN sRAMSEU r o''i2g2� FDVBNEE R;. �' 4. I �q j o 64 150 .F = d ' � F ♦ ¢ ! IV � p 28 � QP i.............._. �� PJ a rrr q°!y 4 f �CWR' �d..,•,i I L ... S ... caTRANE I „� � m$: � 1�z SRO '� ,'� ..;.. a... _......,�.._...._..... _ �. • �`2 v DAD A,EADDw 42 y<►'o „� V p (2012f (26t31~� �:� tf�6n CpX V LING RD ? ! �F1' mr �e> o $'` ..,, ? ROYAL P o L F�to P RDO (ten 1 g f ! OYAIDG BUFFALO F �\ ) R13 ,I , 280 ORb yy ¢ 9 4:3. m e -ap .\PDpt,I SPINKS j �Z RD s cµ lrRov AV1NE ~ i� AD - LL p........ ....._.' H "^: ac................ Ir �J v w N ",MAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Producer: Location: Telephone: Type Operation: Number of Animals: (Design Capacity) STORAGE STRUCTURE: APPLICATION METHOD: Jeanette Williams 338 Williams Dairy Road Liberty NC 27298 336-622-4762 Existing Dairy Milk Cows 250.00 head Waste Storage Structure Irrigation/Broadcast The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal :waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner: 1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. 2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. 3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established. 4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when -the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DWQ regulations. Page: 1 I WASTE UTILIZATION PL� 5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. 6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the same. The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. In some cases you may want to hav lant analysis made, which could a ow a e o e a lied. rovis�ar� area receiving waste to -be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production. This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission. AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, tt3, tons, etc.) 250 head x 32.1 tons waste/head/year = 8025 tons AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR 250 head x 69 lbs PAN/head/year = 17250 lbs. PAN/year Applying -the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application. Page: 2 • ANIMAL MAL WASTE UTILIZATIONAN TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER' TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ----- or ------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME 4490 18 HeB FESG 3.5 131.2-5 5.44 714 I AU- o'kn Iasm 4490 120 IHeB NV;FB-MY END FESG 13.5 1131.251 1 3.08 1404AU- .25 I I II I I I TOTAL11118.25 - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen. Page: 3 ` WASTE UTILIZATION PL2 TABLE l: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER " TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ---- or ------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME 4490 11 HeC FESG 3.2 120 5.4 648 B AU- NV;FB-MY 4490 16 FESG �VaB IB 14.8 J180 I 110.56111900.8 AU - NV; FB-MY 4490 17 VaB FESG 180 IB 14.8 1 15.73 11031.4 AU - NV; FB--MY 4490 19 VaB FESG 180 IB 14.8 J. 18.7 11566 AU- NV; FB--MY 4565 1 FESG 180 jApll IB 14.8 1 116.4312957.4 AU- NV;FB-MY 4565 3 CS 15 180 jCeB2 IB I 1 1720 Apr -May 4565 SG 2 4 1-3 ICeB2 B 1100 1 1400 Sept - Nov 4565 4 CS 15 180 ICel32 IB I I 1 113-7312471.4 Apr -May 4565 SG 2 1-4 jCeB2 IB 1100 1 113.7311373 Sept - Nov 4565 5 CS 15 180 3.43 jCeB2 IB I I I 1617.4 I Apr -May 4565 SG 2 3.43 1-5 jCeB2 IB 1.100 1 1343 Sept - Nov Page: 34 IfINAL # WASTE UTILIZATION 4564 1 CS 15 180 6.08 1094.4 jApll IB 1 1 1 1 Apr -May 4564 SG 2. 100 6.08 1-1 jApB IB I I I IG08 Sept - Nov 4564 2 CS 15 180 31.43 5657.4 ICe1B2 IB I I I I Apr -May 4564 SG 2 1-2 jCeB2 1100 1 IB 131.4313143 Sept - Nov 4564 7 CS 15 180 4 jHe13 IB I I 1 1720 MAR-JUL 4564 SG 2 4 1-7 jHeB 1100 1 IB 1400 Sept - Nov 4583 1 FESG jHeC 13.2 1120 1 IB 15.66 1679.2 AU- NV;FB-MY 4583 2 FESG jHeC IB 13.2 1120 1 14.2 1504 AU - NV; FB-MY 4583 3 FESG 13.9 IHeB IB 13.5 ,131.251 11824.37 AU- NV;FB-MY 4583 5 CS 15 180 2.9 IMaC IB I I I I 1522 MAR-JUL 4583 SG 0 0 1-5 jMaC IB 1 1 12-9 Sept - Nov 4583 7 CS 15 180 jApB IB I I 1 110.-6311913.4 Apr -May 4583 SG 2 10.63 1063 1-7 jApB 1100 IB I I Sept - Nov END TB Page: 4 ASWASTE UTILIZATION P TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE (Agreement with adjacent Landowners must be attached.) (Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specification 2.) TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE & CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS COMM N ** * LBS DETERMINING PHASE CODE AW N PER ACRES AW N PER AC AC USED ----- or ------- APPLY RESID. APPLIC METH N TIME END TOTAL 10 Indicates -that this field is being overseeded'(i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. ** Acreage figures may exceed.total acreage in fields due to overseeding. * lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied. Page: 4 8 i . 11IMAL WASTE UTILIZATIONOR �} TOTAL132157.1 - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals. NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen. Page: 5 5 ON& WASTE UTILIZATION A 10 APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop. If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer'to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts. (Tract I Field I Soil Type 14490 1 IS I HeB Application RatelApplic. Amount Crop (in/hr) f (inches) FESG I 0.3 *0.75 4490 20 HeB FESG 0.3 *0.75 * This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions. Page: 6 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN ** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to overseeding. * lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied. The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above: CROP CODE CROP UNITS PER UNIT CS CORN SILAGE TONS 12 FESG FESCUE - GRAZED TONS 37.5 SG SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED TONS 2 TABLE 1 TABLE 2 TOTAL TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2 ACRES LBS AW N USED 155.3 33275.42 0 0 155.3 33275.42 *** BALANCE 1-16025.42 1 ------------------ *** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N produced. Page: 7 r *M'AL WASTE UTILIZATION PLO Your facility is designed for 120.00 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 4.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm. It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid. Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste. Page: 7R 4tIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION P AN NARRATIVE OF OPERATION This 250 head dairy operation uses 8.52 acres under solid set irrigation.The remaining waste is applied by broadcast using a honeywagon. The WUP designates fields for irrigation and broadcast.Waste is scraped from the lot into a open drystack with the solids separated using pickets.The liquid waste from this operation is stored in a waste storage pond. 48 acres Some of the gun set on field N. 20 will throw beyond the edges of the field and into thw woods. Since Mr. Willliams owns this property, this will be okey according to Mr. Jerry Pate, NRCS Civil EngineerTechnician. Page: 8 OkASTE UTILIZATION PLb REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 1. Animal waste shall reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application: Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. . 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who -is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of -the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil' type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but.less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass -filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip) S. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation..field. 5. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.) 7. Liquid waste shall -be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. Page: 9 *WASTE UTILIZATION PLY REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy. 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips). 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells, 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. 17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and 'structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge. Page: 10 ' 4SWASTE UTILIZATION PL ' REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 18. If animal production at the facility is to be"suspended or, terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion. 19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker -will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds. 22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate--- determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five ( 5 ) years. 23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations. Page: 11 V 0 ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT Name of Farm:Williams Dairy Owner/Manager Agreement I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request. Name of Facil4,ty Owner: Jeanette Williams Signature : Z ate : 9 ` /�, Name of Manager(If different from owner): Signature: aw Date: f - /7Tz J T" Name of Person Preparing Plan: BILL TIMPSO/#4OAI K -_ & V I Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 336-629-4449 (Ext 3) Address (Agency): 241 SUNSET SUITE 105 AVE ASHEBORO NC 27203 00�,000 .0� Signature: Date: Page: 12 4&IMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLC I, ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT (Needed only if addltlonal land has to be leased, etc.) , hereby give permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below. The fields? on which waste can be applied are shown on the attached map. I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer. Adjacent Landowner: Waste Producer: Date: Date: Technical Representative: Date: SWCD Representative: Date: Term of Agreement: ,19 to (Minimum of Tea Years on Cost Shared Items) (See Required Specification No. 2.) Page: 13 1 +a 4RNIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AN STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF I, Public of said County, do hereby certify that a Notary , personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of , 19 My commission expires Notary Public. ( SEAL ) Page: 14 OtIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION Pnl�dQ Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver -Agreement I, hereby agree to apply waste generated by in a manner that meets the Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste utilization system that has been accepted in.writing by the Division of Water Quality. Third Party Receiver: Date: Term of Agreement: to (Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items) STATE OF NORTH CAROLIA COUNTY OF I, Public of said County, do hereby certify that , a Notary personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal this 19 My commission expires (SEAL) day of Notary Public. Page: is E�, Zii ON 11. CMAWW" ��q_ .,/�`I f t' ��'� ,{� �� .5 �yfllf � / .i r�-- fl��l\\�� ,\ - �;�' + HH --" 1 -ti_. A,j �' Gf�f !� �' , it,�oqr,/ =1 _ _ LSz9 ,� /1I�S��?\�` \��i1�4}1 41I let I '46 13 It u;s we Ivu 0 p 0 f „`�l��r�\ � �"C��'�`� �� •\'1'�1�%��lrl/,'l 1., I. �f `�l ! �=�`;;� .,,\/.�'1+1-�'�:`1��;IT�J� nV~:� l�1\��-��/r./.J ARR - NMI: z,7. M Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities Facility Number Q Facility Name Wi'111'A1PL5._ �11'/'(/ Number of Animals Facility is Certified for Date of Certification _ 9 ' Z4—c Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to accommodate: Dairy Milking 170 Dry cows '.a Heifers _-_ 3�2__ Calves In Beef Brood Cows Feeders Stockers TOTAL CONFINED ANIMALS a� '* ** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what.your technical specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can accommodate. Please use the space below to describe the operation. Amended Certification (only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified): By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated far the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number). Farm owner/appiican Signature Farm manager (if applicable) Signature Date 9_ ` zl' a Date Technical Specialist Signatures Date Phone Number C3�) 31 A ~ (4-cio 11Y Mei 4 1; 0 Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations Source Cause BAIPs to Control sects Site SJim IC Practices �..... _ In- -- ---Liapuid Systems - -- - - hlush GLIUCIS Accumidation of solids ❑ Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from gutters as designed. Cl Remove bridging ol'accumulaled solids at discharge Lagoons and Pits Crusted Solids ❑ Ivlainlain lagoons, settling basins and hits where pest breeding is apparent to minimize Elie r 4 1 1r 0 crusting of solids to a depth of no more dian G - 3 inclies over more liian 344/6 of surface. Excessive Vcgetalive Decaying vegetntiun ❑ Maintain vegetative control along banks of Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along water's edge on impoundment's perinicter. Dry Syslclns Feeders Feed Spillage Design, operate and 111u1intain feed systems (e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation of decaying wastage. Cl Clean tip spillage on n routine basis (e.g., 7 - 1 q' day interval during stammer; 1 S-30 day interval ,during winter). Feed Storage Accumulations o1 Iced residues Reduce m0isture 11CCmnu1a6011 within and around immediate.perimcler of feed storage nreas by insuring drainage away from site and/or providing adequate contninmient (e.g., covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high Iniopslurc grain products). U Inspect for and reinovc or break tip nccuinuialed solids in filler strips around feed storage as needed. m AMIC -November 11, 1996, Page I Source Coarse Ijbil's to R4inimize Odur Site Specilic 1111clices Lill stations Agilaliun during sump Itmk ❑ Sump tank covers filling and dnimlutvn' I nd of drainpipes at 0 Agitntion during rvastcwalcr Cl Extend discharge point of pipes undernealh ' lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level Lagotm surfaces a Vol;ltiie gas emissions; ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity; • Biological misting., ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures; , • Agimliun ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio; O Minimum agitation while pumping; it ❑ MCC1M11iCal M1116onr; . 14{ ❑ Proven biologicid additives Irrigation sprinkler I llgh pmsstlre agitation; 114 Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind; norzlcs Wind drift O Miniinum mcomnicnded Operating procedure; Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface; ❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon Dcad birds 0 Cal -Cass decomposltonl ❑ Proper dispusiliun ofcarcasses Dead bird disposal pits 0 Carcass dccomposilitni, ❑ Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits; r ❑ Proper locatlon/mistruction of disposal pits; ❑ Dispusaf pit covers light Titling Standing water arumid a Improper drainage; Qi/ Grade and landscape such that wafer drains Facilities 0 Microbial dccornpositi011 Of a►vay fi-out facilities organic matter . Mud tricked onto public Poorly maintained access roads farm access road maintenance roads from faMn itcccss �Addiliooal Infornialion : Available from : 11oullry Maitre fviayngemenl ; 02OU Rule/13M1' Packet NCSU, Conroy Extension Centcr Poultry Layer Produclitoll facility A-ianarc Management: I ligh Rise, Deep Pit ; EDAE 131-88 NCSU - BAC r l� Poultry Layer Produclion facility Manure Management: Undercage Flush - Lagoon Trenfill ent ; EUAC 130-88 NCSU - BAE Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Mai itire 'I'renlrnent and Storage ; EBAE 103-83 NCSU - BAE Alibralion of Mamu'e and Wasicivater Applicition Equipment ; L BAl: fact Sheet NCSU - IIAU Proper Disposal of Dead Poultry ; PS&I' Guide No. 19 NCSU - Poullry Science Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and flies ; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proccedirigs Florida Cooperative Extension Ahl0C - November 1 I, 1996, Pagc'7 1 Dairy Farm Waste Manag6ment Odor Control Checklist Source Illl•II's to Minimize Odor Slle Specific Praclices F Curse Farmstead U;lily production rVegetative or wooded bailers mil'1�'mcconlnlcllded best ularlagel►ient practices ! 4��food jiidgmellt and Cot11rl1oll sense Paved lots or bam alley We( manure -covered surtiices �Sciape cir flush doily surfaces 0/Ihomotc drying mill proper ventilation tY Routine chucks and mailltenwice oil %valevers, hydrants, pipes, stock Ianks Bedded areas 0 Urine n, 1'ramolc drying with proper ventilation • Partial microbial decomposition Replace ivet or manure -covered bedding Manure dry stacks • Pnrlial microbial decuulpasilioic Provide liquid thainage for stored manure Storage lank or basin - • Partial microbial decomposilion ❑ Ilnllom or mid -level loading surf Ice • Mixing while filling , .' ❑ •mirk covers • Agitation when emptying Cl Basin surface plats of solids; Cl Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions El Agitate only prior to manure removal ❑ Provcli biological addilivcs.or oxidants Settling basin surliiccs l'arlial microbial dccompusitiuu p I_idcdd drainage lion settled solids — - • Mixing while filling ❑ Rcniove solids regularly • Agitation when emptying Manure, slurry or sludge • Agitation when spicading ❑ Soil injection of slurrylsludges spreader oullcts Volatile gas emissions I� Wash residual manure from spreader tiller use ❑ Proveu biological additives or oxidants Uncovered numure, 0 Volatile gas emissions while Cl Soil injection of starry/sludges slurry or sludge oil field drying Cl oil incorporation wilhin 18 firs surfaces Spread in thin unirorm layers for rapid drying Cl Proven biological additives or oxidants Flush links 0 Agitation of recycled IflgOO11 ❑ Flush lank covers; liclnid while links arc filling C1 Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with i I•, anti -siphon vcn[s Outside drain codlectiun Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers or junction boxes Conveyance - AMOC - November 11. 1996, Page l 16 Source Cause []A'li's to A111011117,e OlI01- Site'Specilic I'rnclices Lift stations 0 Agilation during sump tank Cl Su11111 tank covers . filling and dr-mvilo n laid of drainpipes al • Agitation (luring %vaslewaler ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes uuderncuth I7�y'OUil CO11VCj'il11CC lagoon liquid level Lagoon Surfaces 0Volatile gas emission; ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity; • Biological mixing; ❑ Cprrcct Ingoon startup procedures; • Agilation Cl Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio; Cl Minimum agitalioll when pumping; ❑ 7MCanicaE ncralion; ❑d biological additives Irrigation sprinkler •, High pressure agitation; l •rigate on dry days with little or no wind; nozzles Wind drill' imunl recommended operating procedure; i rump intake near lagoon liquid surface; '- ❑ 1' (nip from second -stage lagoon; Bush residual manure from pipes at end of slurry/sludge pumpings Dead animals Carcass decompositiull Clj/ Proper disposition of carcasses Slanding watcr around • Improper drainage; IX Grade and landscape such plat water drains facilities . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities organic nlatler Mad tracked onto public Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance roads from farm access Additional Information : Available From ,qattle Manure Management ; 0200 Rule1131011 Packet - NCSU, Counly Extension Center Dairy Gducalional Unit Manure Management System Fake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory ; LBAE 209-95 NCSU - BAC Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatmclit and Storage ; EBA13 103-83 NCSU - BA13 Management of Dairy Wastewater ; LBAE- 106-83 NCSU - BAG Calibration of Mamire and Wastewater Application Equipment ; HUAC Fact Sheet NCSU - BAG Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Managemenl: Odors and Ffics ; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension i., it. x AMOC - November 11. 1996, rage 2 ,Sulirce Chase 116'11's to CUlltrol 111sects. SIIC Spect Ic Pruclices Animal I folding Areas Accumulations of animal wastes W'_ Eliminate loiv areas that trip moisture Along will teed wastage fcltces and olher locations where waste accII111ulales and disturbance by a1 moils is . ff Maintain fence rows and filler strips around animal Bolding areas to minirlliac accumulations of wnsles (i.e., inspect for and remove or break up acciuntilated solids as 1leeded). Dry Manure l landling • ACcinillllations oI mimal wastes U Itemove spillage on a routhic basis (e.g., 7 - 10 , I ` SyslCnls Jay interval during sunnncr; 1 S-30 day interval during winter) where manure is loaded For land application or disposal. ft,/Provide lur adequatc dr: iiiage nr'omid manure' stockpiles. 0 Inspect for and remove or break lip accumulated wasics in filter strips Around stockpiles and manure handling wrens as necdcd. For more information caulact IhC Cuoperative l"XtCnsiun Service, Department of l'ritumulogy, Box 7613, NUllh Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC:, 27695-7613. AMIC - Nilvcmbcr 11, 1996, Pagc 2 Mortality Management Methods (check which method(s) are bding implemented) Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water. Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7 ❑ Complete incineration ❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the Department of Agriculture ❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached) December 18, 1996 0. 0 RANDOLPH COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN PROJECT/FARM: WILLIAMS DAIRY FARNACK WILLIAMS DATE: October 1997 • Contact the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality - Winston-Salem Regional Office at (910) 771-4600 if the problem occurs Monday through Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm. If the problem occurs outside of those hours contact the State of North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety - Division of Emergency Management - Raleigh at 1-800-662-7956 or (919) 733-3942. Provide the following information: FACILITY NAME: Williams Dairy Farm LOCATION: 3885 Williams Dai Road Libeqy 27298 REGISTRATION/PERrMT # 74— 50 • 1f there is danger to human life, downstream residences, roads, etc. call 911 of the RANDOLPH County Sheriff's Department. • Begin lowering the liquid level in the pond by applying waste water to nearby irrigation fields if possible. • Contact a contractor to begin repair of the problem to minimize off -site damage (list the names and phone numbers of three below). • Contact the RANDOLPH Soil and Water Conservation District at (910) 318-6490. • Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage pond . If this specialist is no longer working or is not available, contact another technical specialist who has design approval such as the Area Engineer. NAME PHONE NUMBER Shaban Kaji, PE, CPESC (910) 318-6490 Jerry Pate, CET Q 637-2400 Angela Jessup, CE (Area II Engineer) V (W�0) 637-2400 • • RANDOLPH COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN PROJEC DATE: • A 4" x 4" treated post, painted white or a 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation W. At no time should the effluent level rise above the maximum liquid level, which is�feet level below the settled top of dam. • A visual inspection of the waste storage pond will be performed at least twice a year. The inspector should check the condition of the dam and the emergency spillway. The inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the back slope and at the toe of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to check for signs of damage due to varmint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.) burrows. A visual inspection should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the structure is not experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be brought to the attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations. The waste storage pond will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded areas shall be repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground cover shall be reseeded to provide a vegetative cover sufficient restrain erosion. The dam and all constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 500 pounds of 10-10-10 per acre or its equivalent. • Maintain all waste handling equipment —pumping, loading, hauling, spreading, etc. -- in accordance with the manufacturers specifications. • All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization plan. The waste storage pond will be emptied at the end of each design storage period (M days or months} or as needed due to excess rainfall. See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the effluent. ,a -ri z t 4os t 454)/ � s77 67 �/o�: (165,el)(0,7,67 • ANE CONCRETE- - g" Pvc PIPE e • .1 f r 1 ` 93 97 0 I } ►�� PIPE INv. k G VEL OUTL T PROTECTION ` \ (4" (3EOWEB FILLED -- f CONCRETE) I '�`-- -- -CON OFF 1 y ,\ TOP OF BERM 1 AA 1 • y v! / [90! l DIVERSION ITCH f ea �i s5 `, BADE TO { {gni e9fi.5 ff �G SIDESLOPE, [ �sw € v—SHAPE, 3- DEEP S{de Sio a 3_1 ' MINIMUM Rea'% so,000 `+ + / �EcTOCIMON To ELD DETERMINED) [ { + . �90 449r, BORROW AREA k• � /Lb 4v- 1),A",5 �� u Stic � �� - ellO7 r Dry.�xuc oe��-Ivllz y (a�ve►, o5o w5 I+6 3t, SO 7, 48 9i � y Spa 1_ 2 �� 19 Goys _/ Ton /vQ ��4 �D a�. Qy) I � �� S�aGK •,W��_ ,no /opt. _ . y lol!ole. Size 4-55,MC- :Qnr,m-r F 14. �� x. GcI = 7�i Dec f� 1t , % l►d� x, qdv,,OAT See /�cc�ss �aQJ zd �,d� x 60' �e4 90, ff .,zbd Z4, 'Poo �SS✓ML�/01/10 romp Whole— 1-eo� (qs) oY — 6cK6 = 9,3ao—gaga 16 zQ� ��3 1,I 1'!' CC t AA- 4 2- .7- z.5 - q % 14,: --- - - - 120 J J/. j 'IZ4 fez) - COO fZ,-- 032 '/ -- 2 hWa - r �ci `sce. 6014. /20 41 � rv4 . r 5,•42 u$b z om e -- 55b-9 f'�a -57 y Ir- Q F a 14,556 SF t� $� .2-0 SF dtt10.260 5F FORMUtA At +Ab,2,16 CF 2/G Pl 90 r b K" • " 1 0/� , ty 3 �..__......_.__.__.. �. %�.-- _ jr� j;5% =� � �5 �f ��x-��d 53.. - �- J•�-�a g �� -�5 oar-P ----- 4 V . 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DAIRY WASTE STORAGE POND WORKSHEET (DAIRYWSP 1.1, 1/97 by P. Crawford) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: WILLIAMS DAIY FARM (WASTE POND DESIGN). :,_- $ . . . I •.'.) Design Worksheet for: WILLIAMS DAIRY FARM In RANDOLPH County, North Carolina Date: Thursday, 10/16/1997 1. Wa to Generated: ,4o' 250 ows x 1.95 cu.ft/cow/day x 120 Days x 50 % confinement / 100 29250 cu.ft. 0 Heifers x 1.40 cu.ft./heifer/day x 120 Days x 50 % confinement / 100 = 0 cu.ft. 2. Wash Water: (3.0 gals./day/cow) / (7.48 gals./cu.ft.) x 250 cows x 120 Days - 12032 cu.ft. 3. Lot Run-off ( Nov . - 12" x 11000 sq. ft. AA., -rib, - 12943 cu.ft. cam,*- .,WL.1 4. Undiverted Area Run-off (Nov.- 0.0" / 12" x 0 sq. ft. - 0 cu.ft. 5: Excess Rainfall on Waste Storage Pond: 238.0 ft. length x 84.0 ft. width = 19992 sq. ft. 19992 sq. ft. x( .:) in. /12 in. 12728 cu.ft. 6. 25-year 24-hour Storm on Feedlot: 12" x 11000 sq. ft. ��' 9„'r z. = 5408 cu.ft. Pg 7. 25-year 24-hour Storm on Outside Undiverted Area: 0.0" / 12" x 0 sq. ft. = 0 cu.ft. 8. 25-year 24-hour Storm on Waste Storage Pond: 5.9" / 12" x 19992 sq. ft. = 9829 cu.ft. TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME = 8�91 cu.ft. = 61 792 gal. 6 Cnnwgd Storage Volume for the 25 year - 24 hour Storm = 15238 cu.ft. Storage Volume at "Begin Pump" Elevation = 66954 cu.ft. 1 2 ' DESIGN FOR: WILLIAMS DAIRY FARM In RANDOLPH County, North Carolina Date: Thursday, 10/16/1997 WASTE AND RAINFALL DESIGN DETAILS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NOTES: WILLIAMS DAIY FARM (WASTE POND DESIGN) WASTE PRODUCTION: 250 Number of Cows 0 Number of Heifers 4 months of Waste Storage in WSP 50 % Time Confined to Lot 1.95 cu.ft./animal/day Cow Waste 1.40 cu.ft./animal/day Heifer Waste 3.0 gal/day/cow Wash Water 120 days of Waste Storage in WSP 29250 cu.ft. Volume of Cow Waste for Stor. Period 0 cu.ft. Volume of Heifer Waste for Stor. Period 12032 cu.ft. Wash Water to Store for Stor. Period 82191 cu.ft. Total Volume including Rain Water 614792 gal. Total Volume including Rain Water RAINFALL AND RUNOFF: DRAINAGE AREAS: 11000 sq. ft. Lot Drainage Area 0 sq. ft. of Other Undiverted Drainage Area 19992 sq. ft. Surface Area Of WSP STORAGE -PERIOD RAIN WATER: 14.1 in. Normal Lot Runoff (36"/year or 1811/6-mo. for imperv. 0.0 In. Normal Runoff from Undiverted Area 7.6 in. Excess Rainfall on Pond (Rainfall Less Evaporation) 12943 cu.ft. Water from Normal Lot Runoff 0 cu.ft. Water from Other Undiverted Drainage Area 12728 cu.ft. Excess Rain Water on Pond 25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM WATER: 5.9 in. Lot Runoff from 25-year 24-hour Storm 0.0 in. Undiverted Runoff from 25-year 24-hour Storm 5.9 in. Rainfall on Pond from 25-year 24-hour Storm 5408 cu.ft. Lot Water from 25-year 24-hour Storm 0 cu.ft. Undiverted Water from 25-year 24-hour Storm 9829 cu.ft. Water on Pond from 25-year 24-hour Storm 15238 cu.ft. All Water from 25-year 24-hour Storm lots) w 3 DESIGN FOR: WILLIAMS DAIRY FARM In RANDOLPH County, North Carolina Date: Thursday, 10/16/1997 WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NOTES: WILLIAMS DAIY FARM (WASTE POND DESIGN) WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN: 82191 cu.ft. Total•,Storage Vol to ESW Crest 6.9 ft. Pond Depth from Bottom to ESW Crest 1.2 ft. Depth from ESW Crest to Top of Dam 1.0 ft. Required"Freeboard 3.0 ft./ft. Inside Side Slope 238 ft. Top -of -Dam Length 84 ft. Top -of -Dam Width 190 ft. Length of Bottom 36 ft. Width of Bottom 17725.4 sq.ft. Top Area for Prismoidal Formula 11801.1 sq.ft. Mid Area for Prismoidal Formula 6729.2 sq.ft. Bottom Area for Prismoidal Formula 0.41 ac. Pond Surface Acreage EMERGENCY SPWY DESIGN: 10.0 cfs Peak Discharge through Emergency Spillway 4.0 €/s Max. Velocity in Emergency Spillway 12 ft. ESW Bottom Width (Assume 3:1 Side Slopes) 0.2 ft. Design flow Depth in ESW (Based on A w Q/V) "START PUMP" DEPTH: 6.0 ft. Deep at "Begin Pump" Elev. 66954 cu.ft. Volume•at "Begin Pump" Elev. 500813 Gal. Volume at "Begin Pump" Elev. 225 ft. Long at "Begin Pump" Elev. 71 ft. Wide at "Begin Pump" Elev. 190 ft. Long at Bottom 36 ft. Wide at Bottom 16108.0 sq.ft. Top Area for Prismoidal Formula 11095.7 sq.ft. Mid Area for Prismoidal Formula 6729.2 sq.ft. Bottom Area for Prismoidal Formula 3.0 ft./ft. Inside Side Slope ' CLAY LINER DESIGN (if Required): (See Tech. Note 716, Rev 1) 0.023 ft:/day Specific Liner Discharge (v) 0.003 ft./day Hydraulic Conductivity of Liner (k) 1.2 ft. Lining Thickness Note: Volumes computed using the Prismoidal Formula: Volume = depth/6[(area of top)+(4 x area of midsection)+(area of bottom)j I DESIGN FOR: WILLIAMS DAIRY FARM In RANDOLPH County, North Carolina Date: Thursday, 10/16/1997 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- WASTE STORAGE POND DIMENSIONS (DAIRYWSP 1.1, 1/97 by P.Crawford)- NOTES: WILLIAMS DAIY FARM (WASTE POND DESIGN) r,p<< JI Top El. 105.00 V / \ ESW Crest E1.103.80 St. Pump El. 102.91 lot \ pool / embankment \ \ / \ Bottom El. 96.92 \ / Liner Cut El. 95.72 CROSS SECTION OF STRUCTURE �89 3.0 \11 4--36 STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS Note: Volumes computed using the Prismoidal Formula: Volume = depth/6[(area of top)+(area of bottom)+(4 x area of midsection)} 4e S temb 7, 2000 Kerr T. Stevens North Carolina Division of Water Quality Water Quality Section Non -Discharge Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Dear Kerr, Enclosed in this mailing is the information that you requested for my application of an Animal Waste Operation General Permit to be completed. This information is being provided in response to the letter I received from your office in the letter dated July 11, 2000. I am providing the requested information in duplicate for my operation identified as Jeanette Williams, Williams Dairy; Facility Number; 76-50, Randolph County. As always, if you need additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, Jeanette Williams Enclosures (2) cc: Randolph SWCD �'��.: i'rh'4GSE� y t'•�t''hf?. 4r` Ata �y r J '.ri •r.xp �. ,�.R - S +t•,w r,\ �.-K•�a��.+ r �+Ms� c, kt �,. r ` .ti �. y tti �,t �. "t . r •rt ? d ` , y: �' n..r t � "�:•r,"Rr :�,i ♦' � ia°li.,F �:,�•` .t u,,a k� its � ,t•� :in: 1 ^` .�•xiS� �,s1.. �rYL,�. '�'t ti► a� jt. ,. ,.,,�c_ h�"��',•!'�.rAF i��fl�/ �a� '+1�'t a r`.••14y ,i�telRy �{`��y'�/ � (�� ) �{ ALL Y :t .s•.L ( -'� w'ti4� • : ti' ��t � � '� ' l " h= ;`t it � \� - t.•,h-.�•:Y �l G1t.1A . • .. .. :.1: ' � � � a4 r-t,�s��r. f � =.a L fwtY +� M k- \ \. . 'y;s.i+r 4 �` � .. +a. .yam i Y` it6.y �-•t-':: Ufa' 4srC '�' C�,p Ou�.. t : '' rid' ► r s �r4� +�q,4,'�'i�rat� 5f-' Ix � .,yr:^'.�r.=.,:' y�,"__;j_ ��.+.� k. �f+�x "�F- �c��:y.. ;.r'�: r•: f tl 44 i�+� f }-i �- �f �k� �•, -�.:F .S 17- � 4 3 _ ¢�(- ht �''- ti ac6 4�-' u '•�4�� l + .4 ``�-~-`'.b ?' Fes\ 4` •T x 'y �a\Ft .\. �� l � �* y `4 � � F. .- 44 r.ak' -yr� � • •6 n w� ti' . b 7. av - • i L - ��+��1�`��i �- �v'•Lt� �• '�' 4� � � ' !'_3.i.`a. t � f : a t � a. + r, �� G•��.tk.'�- __ � YGx� �S,i'�.�\ ±-�' •C� `: u-�F:tii' - Rf L� 4 ad;,}�a...,_ +"' i \ ��'':'SR- - .t ,.� ►��; r" y�:v- :��ti:t 1. a"K.{+•�, � 1 •try �' , w �1+ -. _ �F - S '.-,��: s r � `r � •. �` . . /. y, S �' .- �� y �. '4..�'t i- \a k Y a � •�1 .r.,�•�, r 4t t LLZ `� -1 �w �, •.,t1".. `C� f"ry. +. 5 • ..}y- s� :` t'' is 't t �'s. 4.'+.-!k't?r.,`'•'F�" a.'�7 wL4 " � "+ . k t ty. Se ' i �,tl. _ n. �..a � F i _Y !r- .r - i. ♦ S x 4_ A �� l �`. \": .,t� �^� � y 1 S +r=,•wc _ 1. � a a '}#.. t l 3 `'" � s'i. ikj�. �' �s:�e �:'�.��i w� "� l•`:. . -Z_. �,R: • »,r• x �'�,'r ..�4 •,► '! �'J'v:.,: La 'FiS�� '�:,.�,�� —•�a ��F si \ 1'r4y �'' =r a•'�iC`'w .. �:, a �' � ' ' wN� 1 j ♦ n v W » � env t - r �s�'R �� „'��dY ti �;.w. �_�y}''�?;.. � -; i..'C`; �lS t ��- j r S 2i-.r ~ ] r - x-�.- ..'.'• +�+r7`•sa.�� `} lt-4- }.l`-{ys ICY. ti•4• Kir •�•• �� fY'-ti:3��: •�3 rs..y.,.., _h.•� r t'_ ��:j-"�„�i_•i -,. i�xy._ „a`•3'-. a.� .. _• �~:. w:?;q .>y _ � c,a� w�dsY'1�1i'��'"'• ;a•�..1'�r'.t.'i� y".'fr •�-. ';i-?.r-.»4 i,-r 4 .,? ii `.,t. - �• �-ati ; � � k f\ Ya �-`+' ;- S; �' �-. 4`•'. r �� z f+ 4' �x; �w v� � �,r � � v .., 'ta t y; tl .,: i� t wy. WM .,►•r.. �•"• tv��:,•: � l.. a ,prt ie t '� ry`';'§w y' wM1 „`ti:"-.•t: 'u �"�- `�` � ,�.,-��?•� • � }.. , � - : +44i ;�- ..�� , �, 4:t-'^ �s;£ � a 'rc L c 'LtT- r •� °-��'^'-'�'`•,._� �� .�4� \ .t�`Y{�\ ,, .eei. � r•�t 'L1 :�"=`:� '.f `c • '�� •.Y� �2�.- *� .!,a i.i� ,�,��f -'-a c� �1' '� :,-. �� '` � 7 �k /+'t"f• _ hcr� Cam''-'r'� �- c.:r' ti - �� •a- �• i 't4. :-� � � �i 4L}� i 'w"' ` i iw. ! •,:R.:' .�.:, �'� < - t;-mac ," ;..•� � . - 1 _ �'. r k :..�:,.4µ,:'-�'.G' i v � ••'..':-•• .,t. '~�' j- �.•,•t•�' ` __ s - r t 4 '1C� ; _ 1 `,i x- _, •.a `>`-3 �;� --'t..�.€ t� i,�� \� ' l'r:3s� ` r-.i- �.'•I 4, u��' yr •r � a - ?4 � �- �i i.rs f'13 '1'. �i �:.�� y_ x -a:,. - ? Y--t � , ` G .� ,� a �•�xf Y.,t�pc -at �� r I,� J'�° �5.•'.*S' 1. it -�: �... t � t `F ; t i a,.f{ � �yjr �' t• i. t�s t' � } �4- '.N ,`•'irs ! a � jA ••_ti �`i' y� * Y r�, �w�i'- Sy./� .. °y._, r r �=may �' � ♦' �`t � > 9i� r �t�"y�; s,.• t+ ` ! r-t`y fir:5-_ a_ 4^ yat v 1 fl1 - `R' w3` - f 'r i -'' , 41 Y'' �• - C q 'a' t, i 9 r. S x''9".s " ( �♦♦r* tt?^s . i Lt yY r � .z -` t a k -. .. �"'. ` i_� e - ' •,A R.i�.'�V .G �\.Y ' 4 i L•- '" 1 a � }'L-I - MtF �+,�.r t V .{. '. irf,..-." 'i h:4 �r•7.i !" ♦ 'Yc''- �ti �'J'.�+1'�:a�\"' F.,,•,' '-7 ti' � �'•+f - , •,s "f { +��" � - ttr i1: 4-.w �ti I i� g� ;•:r±. _� °'tip �i f J � � 1 ti..� Y' L "t G 1 I ^'� 5 x F��'. - .Y• i •'. � � -�: �� 4 ;, -. }rah �Y. a yc p\L } - •�' T {1�Y.i_ F. t_LV 1 tL" E �.,r i anawn lw y ` _ - x F i i f Z p Pm- RAkE ELo t ERG arr r RD Y D/S! f P• Y _C ice,: t� 1 SSM ]!C , y0 41. E�r - P. t, 4 9 TRIEIa ' 9 r rf �.' O:1dLX ` - R F r G �,p£ 5 ckt[fN i IIOCKE11 RU['16 4wr '4 icy illarb Q�,r4 lr �[ r t IL, 4 rZ�fU'rt:� f o jy ; • y $ - P m a DE stl qp �� z , p Q rOM / 9 w 4i x� Cj: •b RP - NUryr CL PI[D i s 1!� Do a'• At, u _t •, zGOVFt sTE. � y RICHARO }QY, r ,r, " ee OEYey[Y Cyt a+roNs[ u+ F TRaN !ID p NOR ~6 ILL PEIIr Ws, IL'NRLSOk qu ui j.r„ r (j C 4RjC[pH:3 ��C RR I«aoaii',Ip 9 [ pd--I • HD y f� y� p ! PR.7 3 '� lr TNEAST q F1AE 1`� _'YC� t►'i� •';r•r C�/E=1 9 L P.� �a 'r[ , P `gil,Ou YP ° E m r gS I AP . rooR _ rr a Yu V MlI GREL SON CTY 3 Ol r►,�yd,r `' GR t`' OOhfA RlCHLANO C" E rOS3 Ark" oa►'`4 "Rp+ 1LD.ERo RO r• Y1�C' •' cRu7CrTr[LD ,+ LOOP RO. ,• n .. lLILLeus RP 4 w Err i rN ` Nr LN ; 4a y Nc INfOC[ •n �:• S'yr La FA R0. trp��" -a ISL;Dac.a tit, 1 i•,E EEP ct Q saC .7y�, ? cam., y. :.' Mf: r F+ i �� DAA M ! rpLO iXWV [" " '• R = st w W fE 1 r RO 4' PROVIOEN R N0�0 C• u RRITII CN. Au iA . LPG �• q0 i - PFIY,Rg `�O_ -PaWrEP WP°8+ n� 'Owl N r yt+#t n c aus �yv UACH pd wI�ox h' Rn rRt }o i•, ffRG+n NaN E ►so*. w s�,�H�� l.• o c � O. + Cr098 22 g raver aZv IJOy s R �i !• .rkP fp. DOAR R. hQt to Cr ¢ aDuaR n�RylD! �< mC. ra. ,Ey y S q". RD i38 �kkO�rI 2COUNT v a * m 'Pa �4` raa03t� NV v G?a •R s.X. $ R,D r^ C[7 �/ t o . � i[. '%r� h�p l�W •E RP ° z R (T "" r 4ja UNp 00 J I s R A LIBERT) D _ Sa ,:= s' roaLF s xc ERw p T M sra 1,1" r, i.. ty yrMITENE0. R4' P ?? r' a ? ? ..L, ' r`i .'�. ; 73 0 .PETER C� ii r�':��`• E Ira_ � c' « 1 Sby PROVIDE E �h gptLZM * y�.� J ylfR. L11 7 s i f rto Ola \TN x 'a¢ �P i ; a °LN RD �_•. alii ��h t. a0 raR+l I NFREO L o-~ _ TD u>, q FAR Y �g/0 a C 2 �+ - yJs Nd Yi•'• BE NNY LINE YARLEW[180 — —Id'r F NORA 1 �t TO JHF- :- Market r EWIItig � E YE 2INWL0 ;R aY[S `C3 O Ss� ya BFP EN y{ wf Dfbr MSlanc •L, v\ !`-�P . OLOA `s' * N V.sVIEW p fsor . �+'cP Lineberry 4y o` I - our '! 0 ., r' 27298 a:s_- - s+tx r •�� ? "[r Lr ANDRE Y O - i _ e'er y. Q s a RO J o� r 0[NRr '= 0•a ♦ NP` �' + + FOREST EN 2�,2j•AcaS t r P+f[ ei �3;v �k• zi 3 hAV[N .�, �{ 3 o nIw LaR 5� 4.4 Tat[Roa is p3•yP Ttt. y [ qr fir+° tO+,S ! ale sr :af a t°� ! r r 0E. _w �iFe NQCTErr g4� rDr 2 } �4Q'� WILLARD RO RROTS �!IE Q ISEa[ JLA rKET moo- ITl`E faL L- y C Aµ\ r r�` o ; rNF, y� RO ! a r y 4 vd \ 49 ° 7350 �*� + R0 _, o ffi R M r 0 I + ?,<� 4UR s o }2 m '� s IRE P °rr RD R r �wo a P► i FDUS ''-0qi C �a #, vaR 3 R 9� r I RD B 'Rp C p0'o D cAa 0 KLE OrEt S'r ofi _t d. RAON p ]r- Sp• Ta Es�'l a� e- ! 3t ,e W [7 i EN D.. FRA RI i Q �j ALEYy r �=pr TO rY H � f SRIl'S D. I r Z..a � v nF d r Tvr. R pNOY n E 2 3 a= C,r 7 s h 3 c � i r as_dY Y �o o,rE 4y sT_ 77 a ' I � pLr Q 6RUCE tl`� � a .fig+ 'At•' a H mat-"�bt$, o -ci an g r 'rb�� J PUGq Cira�s'-- tµGS 1 �t27317 o c i .Chapel r oX`�' aGJit� r On0> 18 opil a +p ti olan rat0 EJf P O rp O r J RD gNpp; r� ot �' 0 9 �e_- [ yCl �TN.rI aI L de N ROsPtfC) (�ICN O1 `R ;y r PPS, 4,wv,eQ rL r m,'!'x; ROUTH COR DR rARCLI! RO- tl` TI rLL R0 T.. TO NSHI �Rpre g� m RD. LM` o* Q EPSAN I m e o nrsr� --� - ort viile iNillb ro P �� aa' f I ,aa• °GeS pL E g �o �aY �Hey FIRE J SMa01 0 TR,Hltl �' j. ]ULI v MrR pP u J rTR P R. RO CM !�}f� A �rf r \::_ `p IS F ,ORO' Gf Ott ES _COL.UMBIA oY o s °TALfY\ r<n { 1 ! S v _ !. p ,. ha Rio Q� YI .?=�'tR E. Q b{f m owl n 0 QERNY o O q B 'm Bgyrd"1 !� i 22 u f a x2E Iw a R f F �, 'FS� Oiy W c°Whites REM$RO. caLO o+-a t_.-i.l I ° { � L � o' FiLf o B1, apel fv L27355 vOEF- F 2 l 4 f I l., a sx cr, P savg7� a poL i `t ��` ) ' f -� P Lh�os i�� Dq �+Rr RrOGEIV ° V c 1r .Al ,- -- 1E m Ac f CEOAR F0q s -1 P� RwaOlfkq 4 ' cr n .. rqp p fSr RO ORE L _ - *, re i 5 Zk RE � • � rq�'Y�r VYrNI yr REMk4'p �O narOp R0. rr . 2 �pGUS �O ,Y}� W � �O snF I 4! i dy O lO I LLE �2. R 9 O 40 q F C� p0 t LARGLET rI RC y NrI'DR Rri' A pp [CI'O �L D 4 73 '1 , _ 1. P Iqi°a3 �, CBOT a P° RpOsr�V • �'a a ShDORx 40 - r p 74 CEN RA L[Dr FOx !EL % ;V f Tom*., c• s,yEq >< u r 7 248y y `' e1,F w0' clips TI---ChdarFac FAtts R nil v ,w �+* a'°�+ • *l`o:vas° sr Dlsr Ap a 'It ry 27230 $`¢o �a klingill Q Fa�.11, TOWN IP' 4. •eAsrslOE A� ! v �rElE. �° �r. ,' .':. � t ��Epp4'' `�.yy- �'` `� .f.. r rl r o t r YN wyrP Ta t y\ it �., J r A R 1-� 64 c ti4Frc ! P o = N 401 obi r 2Z r, �! 273l6 r Og L KE ti. 1 b~ '7 t" d _ S� V'. Rp • "'l'" p R� rw P ' O- CNaIIIAI 0 LUCAS �,P PNppopuD y u L} Ram @UR ll YIAEEY Q• YIFO! Lp 0 e SP [•nD ('R" O' F 1 DlSfl 14. c �� gPNO 0 P z v �� a N� °'�° ■ $� " I FT'.L f0U5HEE RD. 9n c�°ie - I [�_ `Fk'y C r° I �� G� �i � �8 O + 'd• a �fRNFSf :� � S ST.E .5� �*.,} { [IS'ufNFTFiPY z R X�ORF/RU Bl1RD 14 _, ... ,• II A p] x SS �' wL A HEB f70 'rQE 4 RA = 49 CGUNTR 1 ! '} p $ 1S IY[aDGYA ! [. iST P' ! n. # �' x '� 7 RI IXDrAN SRO. <[ V i .ri J u h xf -� $s�' .. •r... ��I HIP P , ' U Q n : TARGLLMGOD [ L yak Y 9t '9 1_r �qd ssnraN w C y T br an TXURi �� a CC Z .-LT <raLLraoD y[r N6 �, CIA.- cE �0��.+ 1'� A �,Ry s� ,qT4 ':s PO 4%(I�a;ll ;rslLs 9 14NEWOO in ► ON OTILL IGHT9 �v RINGVI ST. S M xrmPRwG WILD-f0a„ n R ARY 000 4 Q DN LN. .all EE33 .P -'. Lr. o *WNW •N. ft • 0 ANIMAL TRAILS CONTRACT # i (ITEM #2, BARBI (BOTI- Demomm SAX CROM SM & WATM PANDOLPH SOIL and MATM MJIF arm wDtstr�et AS SHOWN uu[ 174 _._ rzs-�o 1�iE#IrEEIr ---, TO SANDY CREEK WILLIAMS DAIRY FARM DRAWING RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA NO SKECTCHS OF PROPOSED ITEMS (LOCATION OF ANNEAL TRAILS)