410012_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 19, 2003 R. rti of EtNR
DR RAY MCKINNIE
NOV 2 4 7003
ADMINISTRATOR AND ASSOC DEAN FOR EXT "� Pa;erI
NC A&T STATE UNIVERSITY DEPT OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
������ Office
€C�
P0BOX 21928
GREENSBORO NC 27420-1928
- SUBJECT: Acknowledgment Receipt Letter
NC A&T State University
File # DV 03-023
Guilford County
Dear Dr. McKinnie:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check # 362479 in the amount of $7,530.33,
received on November 12, 2003.
This payment satisfies in full the civil assessment in the amount of $7,530.33 levied
against NC A&T State University and this enforcement case has been closed. Payment of these
penalties in no way precludes further action by this Division for future violations.
If you have any questions please call Keith Larick at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Keith Larick
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
KL: sw
cc: ,Winston -Salem -Regional Office
Enforcement/Compliance Files # DV 03-023
Central Files
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Affimmative Action Employer
50 % recycled / 1041. post -consumer paper
http✓/h2o. enr. state. nc. us
NCDENR
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

F WA7--c
RQG Michael F- Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r Department of Environment and Natural Resources
to -c
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
October 2, 2003
Dr. Ray McKinnie
Administrator and Assoc. Dean for Extension
NC A&T State University
Department of Animal Science
P.O. Box 21928
Greensboro, NC 27420-1928
RE: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
NC A&T State University
Farm or Permit #
Guilford County
File No. DV 03-023
Dear Mr. McKinnie:
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
N.C.
0 C T 15 2003
Winston-S .ler .
Regional Officis
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), I considered the
information you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to
modify the civil penalty assessment of S7,530.33.
There are two options available to you. You may choose to pay the penalty or you may Iet
the Environmental yianagement Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions make the
final decision on your remission request.
If you choose to pay the penalty, please make your check payable to the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). Send the payment within thirty (30) days of your
receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Keith Larick
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1.877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier ;#52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
500,5 recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
http://h2o. enr. state" nc. us
NCDENR
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Mr. McKittnie
Page 2
October 2.2003
If payment is not received within 30 days from your receipt of this letter, your request for
remission with supporting documents and the recommendation to deny the request will be
delivered to the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions for final agency decision.
If you or your representative would like to speak before the Committee, you must complete
and return the attached form within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter. Send the completed
form to:
Mr. Keith Larick
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
The EMC Chairman will review the supporting documents and your request for an oral
presentation (if you make the request). If the Chairman determines that there is a compelling
reason to require a presentation, you will be notified of when and where you should appear. If a
presentation is not required, the final decision will be based upon the written record.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact
Keith Larick at [phone] ext. 571 or Steve Lewis at [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
F-111.�I:1Q1.51
cc: Steve Mauney, Winston-Salem Regional Supervisor
Melissa Rosebrock, Winston-Salem Regional Office
File No. DV 03-023
Central Files

14
RECEIVED
of WArF� N.C. Deft. of EKNR
AUG 1 9 nnnn Michael F. Easley
2UU3 Governor
G777William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
1 Department of Environment and Natural Resources
o Winston-Sa.em
i�na� atfiGe aan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Reg Division of Water Quality
August 15, 2003
Dr. Ray McKinnie
Administrator and Assoc. Dean for Extension
NC A&T State University
Department of Animal Science
P.O. Box 21928
Greensboro, NC 27420-1928
RE. Remission Request
NC A&T State University
Permit No. AWS410012
Guilford County
File No. DV 03-023
Dear Dr. McKinnie:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference on
October 1, 2003, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 571.
Sincerely,
egy,%r
Keith Larick
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: CSteve-iVlaune.y., Winston-Salem egional-Sti
Melissa Rosebrock, Winston-Salem Regional Office w/attachment
Central Files
File DV 03-023 w/ 3 attachments
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity /Af6rmativeAction Employer
50% recycled / 107b post -consumer paper
httpJ/h2o. enr. state-nc. us
f�
1�l_CD Eh1
Locatiorf:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL AND TECHNICAL
STATE UNIVERSITY
P. O. Box 21928
Greensboro, NC 27420-1928
COOPERATIVE [phone], Fax [phone]
sxrLNSION PROGRAM
August 13, 2003
Mr. Keith Larick
Division of Water Quality 03G
1617 Mail Service Center sGytO`t
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 VI iJE �'�tG tiiac,ceErit
Dear Mr. Larick:
I am writing in response to DWQ's letter of July 14, 2003, citing several violations and
concerns observed during a March 28`h site visit to our porcine research facility. Your letter was
very succinct in its findings and recommendations for changes to insure our compliance with
State rules and regulations governing the management and handling of animal waste. Please
know that it was never the intent or the desire of North Carolina A&T State University to violate
or subvert any such rules and(or) regulations of the State of North Carolina. Per my letter and
signed waiver of right to an administrative hearing and stipulation of facts, I am asking for a
remission or mitigation of the civil penalty assessed the University in the amount of S7, 530.33.
A site visit to our swine operation was initiated by the complaints of Mr. Jay F. Hackett.
Such complaints are not uncommon. Records will show that he has contacted your office on
several occasions as to perceived violations of various rules and regulations by the University.
Although an occasional nuisance to us, his calls and subsequent DWQ visits have assisted us in
evaluating our compliance with the State codes/regulations and in evaluating the management of
our swine unit. Per the guidelines for a written request for remission or mitigation, i have
prepared a response to each of the six violations/concerns noted in DWQ — Winston Salem
office's letter of April 25`h (see attached letter) and reiterated in the State office's letter of July
14th.
Concern #I. The observed discharge was caused by the mechanical failure of our irrigation
system (reel and gun). The chain of the reel had slipped, causing the gun to not be retracted,
resulting in the over application of wastewater to one area of the field. Upon saturation of the
area, wastewater began to runoff the field, which was observed during the site visit. The reel had
been repaired prior to the observation but the damage had already occurred.
Additionally, on April 2, 2003, the swine unit was subject to a routine operation's review site
visit by the Division of Soil and Water Conservation of Guilford County. Their report noted no
evidence of present or past discharge of animal waste to surface waters or wetlands. They could
not confim-/identify the "unnamed tributary or route of discharge to South Buffalo Creek" that
Employment and program opportunities are offered to all people regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability.
North Carolina State University North Carolina A&T State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments cooperating.

Keith Larick
Page 2
August 13, 2003
was noted in your letter. However, there were other observations and comments made that were
similar to those in the April 25`h letter.
Concern #2. As stated above, the irrigation reel was repaired and its use continued under close
observation. Because of the age of our system, it was recommended, by the manufacturer's
service representative, that the system be overhauled. Given the cost of repair and age of our
current reel system versus the purchase of a new system, we chose to replace the entire system
(new reel and gun) effective mid -July. Our new system has been operational for one month and
is an upgrade from our previous system relative to hose size and variable speeds of retraction.
Concern #3. Again, it was never the intent or desire of North Carolina A&T State University to
purposely violate or subvert any such rules and(or) regulations of the State of North Carolina.
Hopefully, our correction of the factors contributing to the observed dissolved oxygen and
conductivity levels will help to dissipate observed levels and return stream levels to normal.
Concern #4. Animal numbers have been reduced on field #3 and crops established on the
denuded land areas. Field #3 is divided into six lots, with minimal animal numbers in two of the
lots. Various combinations of clover, oats, rye, barley and rape have been planted in the field.
The field now has a vegetative cover, on to which wastewater is being applied. Irrigation pulls
(1-4) have been reinstated and can be carried out with minimal interference from the small
number of animals grazing in the lots.
Concern 95. Throughout late fall and winter, we experienced unusually high rainfall, which
impeded our ability to irrigate. When weather permitted aerial application, the unit's staff
worked diligently to apply waste to the various fields outlined in our waste management plan.
Prior to the start of heavy rainfalls in the fall and winter, lagoons #2 and #3 were very much
below their maximum liquid marks. In fact, the wastewater levels were so low that we were very
concerned as to whether or not we would be able to continue the operation of our ongoing
constructed wetlands' research project with USDA-ARS. Currently, lagoon wastewater levels
are below the maximum liquid marker levels and irri_Qation is conducted as weather permits,
given our continued heavy rains throughout much of the spring and summer.
Concern #6. A purchase order, to repair the dam of lagoon #2, had been issued prior to it being
cited in the April 25`h letter. Again, given the heavy spring rainfall and the location of the
lagoon, it was very difficult to find a period of time that was dry enough to allow heavy trucks to
haul in the dirt necessary for repairing the dam. We were aware of the situation and have already
corrected it. Work has been completed and the dam embankment level has been raised and a
vegetative cover established.

.l
Keith Larick
Page 3
August 13, 2003
Hopefully, the explanations listed above adequately addresses the violations and concerns cited
in the DWQ letters_ . Circumstances beyond our control lead to our being in violation of the
identified rules and regulations. It was never our intent to deliberately violate any rules and
regulations set forth by the State of North Carolina. We have taken corrective action to insure
our future compliance and request a remission of civil penalty, totaling $7,5530.33.
If I can be of further assistance or clarification to Mr. Jeffrey Poupart or yourself, please
contact me at the [phone] or e-mail me at mckinnie(cDncat.edu.
Pc: Dr. Alton Thompson
Dr. David Libby
Mr. Richard Phillips
Sincerely;
M. Ray McK nnie, Ph.D.
Administrator & Assoc. Dean

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF Guilford
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
NC A&T State University ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 03-023
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $7,530.33 for violation(s) as set
forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality dated July 14,
2003 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right
to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged
in the assessment document.
The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within thirty
(30) days of receipt of the civil penalty assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will -be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the civil penalty assessment.
This the 3 �h day of ^ ��gLl1� , 20M.
ADDRESS
ATURE
lip
4 ".-' 6 P. 'a/G Z 7-yz0 -'J9Z�
TELEPHONE
�336 33Li 76<71
7
3' 1 a 77 ��Ax)

rflf A Michael F. Easley, Governor
�D�O 9QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
U] r Alan W_ Klimek, P.E. Director
q Division of Water Quality
O 'C
April 25, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL 7001 2510 0001 4778 5697
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Dr. Ray Mc Kinnie
Administrator and Assoc. Dean for Extension
NC A&T State University
Department of Animal Science
PO Box 21928
Greensboro, NC 27420-1928
APR- 2 9 20M
OFF M OF AOMMISTRATOR
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Enforce
Complaint Investigation
NC A&T State University — Porcine Research Laboratory
Facility #86-23
Guilford County
Dear Dr. McKinnie:
This letter is to summarize the violations observed during a complaint investigation performed at NC.
A&T State University's porcine facility on March 28, 2003' ,Melissa Rosebrock and Sue White, with the State's
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Winston-Salem Regional Office (WSRO) conducted the investigation. Mr.
Donald Ford (operator), Dr. Charles Kadzere (animal - science department chair), and Mr. Richard Phillips
(technical specialist) were also present.
The March 28, 2003 visit was a result of a complaint received by our office from Mr. Jay F. Hackett,
alleging that his cattle had become ill and died as a result of "hog waste.from the lagoon that had run-off." He
also stated that waste was currently being applied and that "waste runs off into the creek every time they spray."
On the date of the investigation, Staff observed and recorded the following violations and concerns:
1. At the time of the complaint investigation DWQ.staff observed that animal waste was being applied
to Field #1 (irrigation pull #2)_,Although the wheat field was well vegetated, a discharge of animal
waste was observed running -off the spray field and into a wooded area. DWQ staff followed the
discharge downhill and into an unnamed tributary (UT) to South Fork Buffalo Creek (Class C NSW
waters of the State in the Cape Fear River Basin). The unpermitted discharge of animal waste
from the spray -field and into waters of the State is a violation of your Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP), deemed permit, NCGS 143.215.10C, and NCGS 143.215.10E.
2. The waste irrigation equipment did not appear to be working properly on the date of our
investigation. Per Mr. Ford, the chain on the reel had slipped, causing the hose and gun to not be
retracted properly. The waste application equipment needs to be repaired or replaced immediately in
order to prevent an unpermitted discharge in the future. Failure to ensure that the irrigation
equipment is operated properly is a violation of the deemed permit and CAWMP.
Agy'A
NCDENR
N. C_ Division of Water Quality/WaterQuality Section 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem. NO 27107 [phone] Customer Service
1 80o 623-7748

NC A&T State University
April 25, 2003
Page 2
3. Dissolved oxygen (DO) readings were also taken of the discharge stream as well as
upstream and downstream of the discharge. The discharge DO was measured to be 3.32
mg/L (32.3% saturation) while the upstream and downstream DOs were measured to be
8.45 mg/L (87.8 % saturation) and 4.74 mg/L (49.5% saturation), respectively. Water
Quality Standards for Freshwater Classifications state that the DO for this surface water
should be no less than 5.0 mg/L. You are, therefore, in violation of the NC Water
Quality Standard for dissolved oxygen.
Conductivity (a numerical expression of the ability of an aqueous solution to carry an
electrical current) was also measured and recorded on site_ The conductivity at the
discharge area was 990 p S/cm, while the upstream and downstream conductivity was
100 µS/cm and 830 pS/cm, respectively.
4. DWQ staff also noted that Field #3 (pulls 1-4) was not available for waste application
due to the pasturing of swine in this field for research purposes. This field was also
denuded due to heavy animal traffic. The CAWMP states that there is to be adequate
land on which to properly apply animal waste. Considering the recent pattern of chronic
rainfall, it is strongly recommended that the swine be removed from Field #3 and a crop
established so that this field is available to receive animal waste as soon as possible.
5. The waste level in the second stage lagoon (#2) was observed to be 6 inches above the
maximum liquid mark and 12 inches from overflowing_ The waste level in lagoon #3
(waste storage pond) was even- with the maximum liquid mark. Failure to maintain the
waste level below the maximum liquid mark is a violation of the CAWivIP, deemed
permit, and NCGS 143.215.10E.
6. The dam for lagoon #2 was observed to be damaged and in need of repair due to vehicle
and/or machinery traffic during wet conditions. Failure to establish a protective cover
on the lagoon embankment is a violation of the CAWNIEP and deemed permit.
The Winston-Salem Regional Office is considering recommending an enforcement action
against you for the above referenced violations. If you have justification that these violations are
caused by circumstances beyond your control, or you have an explanation that you wish to present,
please respond in writing within ten (10) days following receipt of this notice. The Winston-Salem
Regional Office will review your response and forward it to the Water Quality Section Chief with
the enforcement package. In the absence of any justification, the Regional Office will recommend
that an enforcement action be taken against your facility. Be advised that North Carolina General
Statutes now provide for penalties of up to $25,000 per day per violation as well as criminal
penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.

NC A&T State University
April 25, 2003
Page 3
PIease address your response to my attention at the address shown on the letterhead. If you
have any questions concerning these matters, please contact Melissa Rosebrock or me at (336) 771-
4600_
Sincerely,
Steve M uney
Acting Water Quality Supervisor
cc: DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Guilford County Natural Resources Conservation Service/Soil and Water Conservation District
Rocky Durham — DSWC MRO
Jerry Dorsett — DSWC WSRO
WSRO Facility Files
Central Files

oF WA rERQ�
July 14, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Dr. Ray McKinnie
Administrator and Assoc. Dean for Extension
NC A&T State University
Department of Animal Science
P.O. Box 21928
Greensboro, NC 27420-1928
Michael F. Easley
Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
REC'tI13
N000- ()i EHNR
J U L 1. 6 2003
Winston-Salem
Flegional Office
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for VioIation(s) of
N.C. General Statute(s) 143-215.1
NC A&T State University
Guilford County
File No. DV 03-023
Dear Dr. McKinnie:
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed NC A&T State University in the amount
of $7,530.33, including S530.33 in enforcement costs.
Attached is a copy of the assessment document explaining this penalty. This action was taken
under the authority vested in me by delegation pursuant to N-C.G.S. 143-215.6A(h). Any continuing
violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (do not include x•aiverform). Payment of the penalty will not
foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment -to the attention of.
Keith Larick
Water Quality Section
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27699-1617
NQ
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier ;#52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Alfrrmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 101. post -consumer paper
httpJ/h2o. enr-state. nc.us
i9 ;M
sir
CDEh`c-
Location:
512 N. Sal isbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed justification for such
request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness of the amount
of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of any of the statements
contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an
administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver (form attached) of your
tight to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute.
You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a detailed
statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.I (b) were wrongfully
applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Keith Larick
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request an administrative
hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to the Office of Administrative
Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must
File your original petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
and
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan Oakley
Registered Agent
Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Ivlail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date stamp (not a
postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being referred to the
Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the penalty. Please be advised
that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which occur after the review period of this
assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Keith Larick at [phone], extension 571.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Poupart
Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
ATTACHMENTS
cc. $egional.Supervisor_w/_attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Office w/ attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF Guilford
ENVIRONMENTAL MANI AGEMENT
COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADVIINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
NC A&T State University ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 03-023
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling _ $7,530.33 for violation(s) as set
forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality dated July 14,
2003 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right
to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged
in the assessment document.
The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within thirty
(30) days of receipt of the civil penalty assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the civil penalty assessment.
This the
day of
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
SIGNATURE
,20

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF GUILFORD
FILE NO. DV 03-023
IN THE MATTER OF
)
NC A&T STATE UNIVERSITY
)
} FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO THE
} AND ASSESSMENT OF
WATERS OF THE STATE OF
) CIVIL PENALTIES
NORTH CAROLINA
)
WITHOUT A PERMIT
)
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Jeffrey
O. Poupart, Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit of the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. NC A&T State University owns and operates NC A&T Porcine Research
Laboratory, located on J.F.H. Dairy Road in Guilford County.
B. The NC A&T Porcine Research Laboratory was deemed permitted as a
nondischarge facility on February 1, 1993 in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0217. An approved animal waste management plan is required by 15A NCAC
2H .0217 as a condition of being deemed permitted.
C. A waste utilization plan (WUP) is a required component of an animal waste
management plan in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC(e).
D. The approved animal waste management plan certification including a WUP for
NC A&T Porcine Research Laboratory was signed by NC A&T State University
on December 19, 1997.
E. The certified animal waste management plan (CAWMP) states that animal waste
shall not be discharged into waters of the State due to run-off or the application of
animal waste. The CAWMP further states that animal waste shall not be applied
when the soil is saturated.
F. The CAWMP states that the waste level in Iagoon #2 must be maintained between
the maximum and minimum liquid marks. At least eighteen (18) inches of storage
above the maximum liquid mark is required for lagoon #2 at this facility. 4

G. The CAWMP states that a protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, etc.).
H. The water quality standard for dissolved oxygen within Class C Nutrient Sensitive
Waters is not less than 5.0 mg/1 for average daily values and not less than a
minimum instantaneous value of 4.0 mg/1 per 15A NCAC 2B.021 I (3)(b).
I. On March 28, 2003, in response to a complaint, DWQ staff inspected the NC
A&T Porcine Research Laboratory. Staff observed animal waste being pumped
from lagoon #1 and irrigated onto a small -grain crop located in field #1 (pull#2) at
the NC A&T Porcine Research Laboratory. Staff further observed a discharge of
wastewater from this sprayfield, downhill into a wooded area, finally discharging
into an unnamed tributary to South Buffalo Creek, a Class C NSW water of the
State within the Cape Fear River Basin.
J. NC A&T State University had no valid permit for the above described activity.
K. On March 28, 2003 DWQ staff documented twelve (12) inches of available
storage in lagoon #2.
L. On March 28, 2003 DWQ staff observed that the dam on lagoon #2 was damaged
and lacked a vegetative cover.
M. On March 28, 2003 DWQ staff measured dissolved oxygen levels in the unnamed
tributary to South Buffalo Creek using a calibrated instrument. Dissolved oxygen
in the stream was found to be 3.32 mg/L.
N. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $530.33.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. NC A&T State University is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A
pursuant to G.S. 1431212(4).
B. The unnamed tributary to South Buffalo Creek constitutes waters of the State
within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
C. The above -cited discharge constituted making an outlet to waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1), for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
D. The above -cited failure to maintain the freeboard level in the lagoon at the level
specified in the WUP is a violation of the 15A NCAC 2H .0217 non -discharge
deemed permit and G.S. 143-215.1.

E. The above -cited failure to establish a protective cover of appropriate vegetation on
the lagoon embankment is a violation of the non -discharge deemed permit and
G.S. 143-215.1.
F. NC A&T State University violated G.S. 143-215.1 and 15A NCAC 2B.0211(3)(b)
on March 28, 2003 when the water quality standard for dissolved oxygen
applicable to South Buffalo Creek was exceeded.
G. NC A&T State University may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than
twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a
person who is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S.
143-215.1.
H. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against NC A&T
State University pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
1. The Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, NC A&T State University is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
Sj20 for making an outlet to waters of the State without a permit
as required by G.S. 143-215.1.
S- OQO for violation of 15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S. 143-215.1
by failing to maintain a vegetative cover on the dam of
Iagoon #2 as specified in the CAWMP.
S D ' for violation of 15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S. 143-215.1
by failing to maintain the liquid level in lagoon #2 as
specified in the CAWMP.
$ (i0O for violation of the 15A NCAC 2B.0211(3)(b) by
exceeding the standard for dissolved oxygen.
S 530.33 Enforcement costs
S 7.530.33 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.14313-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
1 J 1 03
(Date) y O. Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality

NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL AND TECHNICAL
STATE UNIVERSITY
P. O. Box 21928
COOPERATIVE Greensboro, NC 27420-1928
EXTENSION PROGRAM [phone], Fax [phone]
May 9, 2003
Mr. Steve Maunev
Acting Water Quality Supervisor
N. C. Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Dear Mr, Mauney:
RECE!UE[)
N.C. Dept. Ot Et �:
MAY 10 2003
Winster- diem
Regional off ice_
I am writing in response to your letter of April 25, 2003, outlining several violations and
concerns observed during a March 28`h site visit to our porcine research facility. Your letter was
very succinct in its findings and recommendations for changes to insure our compliance with
State rules and regulations governing the management and handling of animal waste. Please
know that it was never the intent nor the desire of North Carolina A&T State University to
violate or subvert any such rules and(or) regulations of the State of North Carolina.
Complaints by Mr. ,lay F. Hackett, as to the operation of our swine unit, are not uncommon.
Records will show that he has contacted your office on several occasions as to perceived
violations of various rules and regulations by the University. Although an occasional nuisance to
us, his calls and subsequent DWQ visits have assisted us in evaluating our compliance with the
State codes/regulations and in evaluating the management of our swine unit. Per your request, I
have prepared a response to each of the six violations/concerns noted in your letter.
Concern #I. The observed discharge was caused by the mechanical failure of our irrigation
system (reel and gun). The chain of the reel had slipped, causing the gun to not be retracted;
resulting in the over application of wastewater to one area of the field. Upon saturation of the
area, wastewater began to runoff the field, which was observed during the site visit. The reel had
been repaired prior to the observation but the damage had already occurred.
Additionally, on April 2, 2003, the swine unit was subject to a routine operation's review site
visit by the Division of Soil and Water Conservation of Guilford County. Their report noted no
evidence of present or past discharge of animal waste to surface waters or wetlands. They could
not confirm/identify the "unnamed tributary or route of discharge to South Buffalo Creek" that
was noted in your letter. However, there were other observations and comments made that were
similar to those in your letter.
Employment and program opportunities are offered to all people regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability.
North Carolina State University, North Carolina A&T State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments cooperating.

Steve Mauney
Page 2
May 9, 2003
Concern #2. As stated above, the irrigation reel has been repaired and is now closely monitored
during times of operation. Because of the age of our system, it has been recommended, by the
manufacturer's service representative, that the system be overhauled. We are moving forward
with scheduling a time for its repair, prior to the busiest part of our pumping season.
Furthermore, we are investigating the cost of completely replacing the entire system (new reel
and gun).
Concern #3. Again, it was never the intent or desire of North Carolina A&T State University to
purposely violate or subvert any such rules and(or) regulations of the State of North Carolina.
Hopefully, our correction of the factors contributing to the observed dissolved oxygen and
conductivity levels will help to dissipate observed levels and return stream levels to normal.
Concern #4. Animal numbers have been reduced on field #3 and crops established on the
denuded land areas. Field #3 is divided into six lots, with minimal animal numbers in two of the
lots. Various combinations of clover, oats, rye, barley and rape have been planted in the field.
The field now has a vegetative cover, on to which wastewater is being applied. Irrigation pulls
(1-4) have been reinstated and can be carried out with minimal interference from the small
number of animals grazing in the lots.
Concern #5. Throughout late fall and winter, we have experienced unusually high rainfall,
which has impeded our ability to irrigate. When weather has permitted aerial application, the
unit's work crew has worked diligently to apply waste to the various fields outlined in our waste
management plan. Prior to the start of heavy rainfalls in the fall and winter, lagoons #2 and #3
were very much below their maximum liquid marks. In fact, the wastewater levels were so low
that we were very concerned as to whether or not we would be able to continue the operation of
our ongoing constructed wetlands' research project with USDA-ARS. Currently, lagoon
wastewater levels are below the maximum liquid marker levels and irrigation is conducted as
weather permits.
Concern #6. A purchase order, to repair the dam of lagoon #2, had been issued prior to it being
cited in your letter. Again, given the heavy spring rainfall and the location of the lagoon, it has
been, and continues to be, difficult to find a period of time that is dry enough to allow heavy
trucks to haul in the dirt necessary for repairing the dam. We are aware of the situation and will
correct it as soon as weather permits.
Hopefully, the explanations listed above adequately addresses the violations and concerns
cited in your letter. Circumstances beyond our control have lead to our being in violation of the
identified rules and regulations. It was not our intent to deliberately violate them and we have
taken corrective action to insure our future compliance.

Steve Mauney
Page 3
May 9, 2003
If 1 can be of further assistance or clarification to Ms. Rosebrock or yourself, please contact me
at the [phone] or e-mail me at mckinnieRncat.edu.
Sincerely,
M. Ray McKinme, Ph.D.
Administrator & Assoc. Dean
Pc: Dr. Alton Thompson
Dr. Charles Kadzere
Mr. Richard Phillips

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Mav 8, 2003
MEMORANDUM:
To: Steve Lewis
From: Steve Mauney
Melissa Rosebrock
Subject: Recommendation for Civil Penalty
NC A&T Porcine Research Laboratory, #41-12
Guilford County
Please find attached, documents supporting the Winston-Salem Regional Office's request for a
civil penalty assessment against NC A&T State University. This request is based on the facility's
continued lack of compliance and the most recent site visit conducted March 28, 2003 in response'to a
complaint alleging the run-off of animal waste into waters of the State. The complaint also alleges that
three cattle died as a result of drinking surface water contaminated with the discharged waste.
On the date of the complaint investigation, staff observed animal waste being irrigated from
lagoon #1 onto a small -grain field. Animal waste was also observed running off the spray field,
ultimately discharging into an unnamed tributary to South Buffalo Creek (Class C NSW). The waste
level in lagoon #2 was documented to be six inches above the maximum liquid mark and 12 inches from
overflowing. Several field parameters were recorded and waste samples obtained for analysis. Dissolved
oxygen in the discharge stream was found to be 3.32 mg/L while the downstream dissolved oxygen was
4.74 mg/L. Both are a violation of the NC Water Quality Standard for Freshwater Classifications.
We request that you initiate appropriate -action from your office and forward the package to the
Water Quality Director for assessment. The following items are also being transmitted for your review:
A) A completed "Findings and Decisions and Assessment of Civil Penalties."
B) Two copies of a completed "Water Quality Enforcement Case Assessment Factors."
C) Most recent correspondence between violator and DWQ, including two copies of
"NOWNOI 10-day letter." Violator did not submit a response.
D) Two signed copies of the most recent DWQ Compliance Inspection (March 28, 2003
complaint).
E) Site diagram.
F) Photographs of the discharge violations observed on March 28, 2003.
G) Field parameters, sample results, and COCs. Also, a summary page outlining the
laboratory results.
Please contact Melissa Rosebrock in our office at [phone] x265 for any additional
information you may need.
Attachments
cc: W'.inston-SalemRegional-6ffice.Facility less
Central Files
...y7

r
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF GUILFORD
FILE NO. DV####
IN THE MATTER OF
}
NC A&T STATE UNIVERSITY
}
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO THE
) AND ASSESSMENT OF
WATERS OF THE STATE OF
) CIVIL PENALTIES
NORTH CAROLINA
}
WITHOUT A PERMIT
)
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, J. Kent
Wiggins, Acting Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit of the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. On the date of the freeboard and discharge violations, NC A&T State University
owned and operated NC A&T Porcine Research Laboratory, located on J.F.H.
Dairy Road in Guilford County.
B. The NC A&T ' Porcine Research Laboratory was , deemed permitted as a
nondischarge facility on February 1, 1993 in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0217. An approved animal waste management plan is required by 15A NCAC
2H .0217 as a condition of being deemed permitted.
C. A waste utilization plan (WUP) is a required component of an animal waste
management plan in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC(e).
D. The approved animal waste management plan certification for NC A&T Porcine
Research Laboratory was signed by NC A&T State University on December 19,
1997. The certified animal waste management plan (CAWMP) states that animal
waste shall not be discharged into waters of the State due to run-off or the
application of animal waste. The CAWMP further states that animal waste shall
not be applied when the soil is saturated. The CAWMP additionally states that the
waste level in lagoon #2 must be maintained between the maximum and minimum
liquid marks. At least 18 inches of storage above the maximum liquid mark is
required for lagoon. #2 at this facility.
E. The CAWMP states that a protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, etc.).

n
F. On March 28, 2003 DWQ staff inspected the NC A&T Porcine Research
Laboratory in response to a complaint. Staff observed animal waste being pumped
from lagoon #1 and irrigated onto a small -grain crop located in field #1 (pull#2) at
the NC A&T Porcine Research Laboratory. Staff further observed a discharge of
wastewater from this sprayfield, downhill into a wooded area, finally discharging
into an unnamed tributary to South Buffalo Creek, a Class C NSW water of the
State within the Cape Fear River Basin..
G. NC A&T State University had no valid permit for the above -described discharge
activity.
H. On March 28, 2003 staff documented only twelve inches of available storage in
lagoon #2.
I. On March 28, 2003 staff observed that the dam on lagoon #2 was damaged and
lacked a vegetative cover.
J. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $530.33.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. NC A&T State University is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A
pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. Unnamed tributary to South -Buffalo Creek- constitutes -waters- of the -State within
the meaning of G.S. 143--215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
C. The above -cited discharge constituted making an outlet to waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1), for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
D. NC A&T State University may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than
twenty-five'thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a
person who is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S.
143-215.1.
E. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against NC A&T
State University pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
F. The Acting Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.

i
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, NC A&T State University is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ for making an outlet to waters of the State without a permit
as required by G.S. 143-215.1.
$ for violation of the CAWMP (Certified -Animal Waste
Management Plan) by overapplying animal waste either in
excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or where runoff
enters surface waters.
$ for violation of the CAWMP by failing to maintain a
vegetative cover on the dam of lagoon #2.
for violation of 15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S. 143-215.1
by failing to maintain the liquid level in lagoon #2 as
specified in the,CAWMP.
$ for -two violations of the NC Water Quality standard for
dissolved oxygen.
$ 530.33 Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215:5A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(5) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) J. Kent Wiggins, Acting Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Type: D'
'Violator: NC A&T State University (owner)
Address: NC A&T State University
Department of Animal Science
PO Box 21928
Geensboro, NC 27420
Guilford County
Responsible Party: Dr. Ray McK nnie, Administrator and Assoc. Dean for Extension
Regional Office: Winston-Salem
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violations:
NC A&T State University violated the CAWMP (Certified Animal Waste Management Plan) and
NCGS by applying waste onto saturated soil that resulted in a discharge to waters of the State.
The discharge of swine waste added an unknown amount of additional nutrients to a water body
already classified as nutrient sensitive.
The individual reporting the complaint alleges that three of his cattle became sick and died as a
result of drinking water from the creek that had been contaminated with animal waste. The
WSRO has not received any documentation substantiating this allegation.
2. The duration and gravity of the violarions:
Unknown. Based on information supplied from the complaint caller, animal waste maj, only
have been discharging from the spray field a few hours prior to investigation by the WSRO on
March 28, 2003. Lagoon #2 was 12 inches from overflowing.
Field #3 (pulls 1-4) was not available for waste application due to the pasturing of swine in this
area which had caused the field to become denuded. Considering the recent pattern of chronic
rainfall in this area, it was recommended that the swine be removed from field #3 (pulls 1-4) so
that this field would be available for waste application. Waste was also washing from the swine
pens located in the wooded area uphill from the unnamed tributary to South Buffalo Creek. The
facility- has been cautioned of this previously_
3. The effect on ground or surface water quality or quantity or on air quality:
Unknown. To date, there have been no substantiated reports of downstream impacts outside of
the area of investigation.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage:

Unknown. Costs would, however, involve repairing the reel and pump; irrigating lagoon waste
levels down to meet compliance; cost of the soil/waste analyses; and repair/seeding of the
damaged area of dam on lagoon #2.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance:
Unknown.
6. Whether the Violations were committed willfully or intentionally:
We believe these violations to be comn-utted willfully and intentionally. NC A&T State
University has been cited several times since 1993 for violations of the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan, resulting in a discharge to waters of the State.
Our office has also' documented numerous complaints alleging misapplication of animal waste
by NC A&T State University. This facility has been instructed .several times by the WSRO
regarding the proper techniques for animal waste application.
7. The prior record of the violator in failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority:
1993 (April) - DWQ issues NOV for overflowing lagoon due to inoperable irrigation pump
resulting in a discharge of waste to waters of the State.
1995 (November) - DWQ issues Notice of Concern to the University Dairy and Swine Farms
due to "Parlor wash, calf feeding, or other activities that could contribute negative impacts to
water duality."
1997 (April) - DWQ issues NOV for failure to designate an Operator in Charge.
1998 (February) - DWQ issues NOV/NOI to dairy facility and NOD to swine facility about
their pumping of waste onto saturated fields.
1998 (April) - Show Cause Hearing is held with University officials and DWQ staff regarding
the improper management of animal waste on their farms.
- 2000 Qune) ='DSWC cites facility, for_ Inadequate-storage_in-swine_lagoons-observed_duung:an "
.operational- review. - - - - - - --
* The WSRO fadhtyr file also documents several complaint calls alleging application of waste
onto fields resulting in a discharge to the nearby creek.
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
Central Office Review and Processing = 100.00
16 hours by investigator for investigating and
drafting report(s) @ $22.27/hr. = $ 356.32
Mileage @ 0.31 per mile for 71 Miles. = S 22.01
1.0 hour by Water Quality Regional Supervisor
for review @ $ 37.00/hr. = 5 37.00
1.0 hour for clerical support @ $15.00/ht. - S 15-00
Total = S 530.33
9. Type of violator and general nature of business (i.e. individual vs. large corporation):
Violator is a public educational institution. Facility where violations occurred is used for
research.

's-`
10. Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore) or recalcitrance:
Operator reported on April 24, 2003 that all swine had been removed from field #3 and sold
and that the field had been planted in oats and clover. He stated that the swine had also been
removed and sold from the pens in the wooded area along the creek.
Operator stated on April 24, 2003 that the irrigation chain and reel had already been repaired.
Operator spoke with WSRO staff on April 30, 2003 and reported that the waste level was now
below the maximum liquid mark in all structures.
11. Mitigating circumstances:
The operator stated that the irrigation reel did not retract properly due to a chain slipping on the
pump/motor. This facility also had a previous discharge in 1993 due to inoperable equipment.
12. Owner of property where the discharge occurred:
NC A&T State University
13. Pictures of discharge (optional):
Digital photos depicting the discharge violation.ate attached.
14. Assessment Factors:
a) IWC: unknown.
b) Receiving stream: Unnamed tributary to South Buffalo Creek, Class C NSW Waters of the
State.
c) Damage: None observed.
. „y

CERTIFICATION PAGE
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT IS TRUE TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
1 �
M. Melissa Rosebrock
Environmental Specialist II - WSRO

t
- DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Type: DV
Violator: NC A&T State University (owner)
Address: NC A&T State University
Department of Animal Science
PO Box 21928
Geensboro, NC 27420
Guilford County
Responsible Part.: Dr. Ray McKinnie, Administrator and Assoc Dean for Extension
Regional Office: Winston-Salem
The degree and extent.of harm to -the natural resources of the -State, to the public'healih, or to
private property resulting from the violations:
NC A&T State University violated the-CAWMP (Certified Animal Waste 'Management Plan) :and
NCGS by applying waste onto saturated soil that resulted.in.a.discharge to waters-ofthe-State.
The -discharge of swine waste added an unknown -amount of additional nutrients -to a water body
already classified as nutrient sensitive.
The individual reporting the complaint.alleges-that three of his cattle became sick -and died as.a
result of drinking water from the creek that had been .con[at if ated with ani.mal.wastd. The
WSRO has not received any -documentation substantiating this allegation.
2. The duration.and.gravity of the violations:
Unknown. Based on information supplied from the complaint caller, animal waste may only
have been discharging from the spray- field a few hours prior to investigation by the WSRO on
March 28, 2003. Lagoon #2 was 12 inches from overflowing.
Field #3 (pulls 1-4) was not available for waste application due to the pasturing of swine in this
area which had caused the field -to become denuded. Considering the recent pattern of chronic
rainfall in this area, it was recommended that the swine.be removed from field #3 (pulls 1-4) so
that this field would be available for waste application. Waste was.also washing from the swine
pens located in the wooded area uphill from the unnamed tributary to South Buffalo Creek. The
facility has been cautioned of this previously.
3_ The effect on ground or surface warer quality or quantity- or on air quality:
Unknown. To date, there have been no substantiated reports of downstream impacts outside of
the area of investigation.
4. Tee cost of rectifying the damage:

Unknown. Costs -would, however, involve repairing the reel and pump; irrigating lagoon waste
levels down to meet compliance; cost of the soil/->aste analvses; and repair/seeding of the
damaged area of dam on lagoon #2.
3. The amount of money- saved by noncompliance:
Unknown.
G. Whether the iiolations were committed willfully or intentionally:
We believe these violations to be committed willfully and intentionally. NC A&T State
University has been cited several times since 1993 for violations of the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan, resulting in a discharge to waters of the State.
Our office has also documented numerous complaints alleging misapplication of animal waste
by NC A&T State University. This facility has been instructed seueral tunes by the WSRO
regarding the proper techniques for %nirn?l waste application.
7. The prior record of the violator in failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management -Commission has regulatory authority.
1993 (April) - DWQ issues NOV for overflowing lagoon due to inoperable irrigation pump
resulting in a discharge of waste to waters of the State.
1995 (November) —DWQ issues Notice of -Concern to -the University- Dairy, -and Swine°Fauns
_ due to `Tailor wash, calf -feeding, or other activities_ that -could -contribute negative impacts to - - -
water quality." -
1997 (April) — DWQ issues NOV for failure to designate an C►perator in Charge.
1998 (February) — DWQ issues NOV/NOI to dairy- facility and NOD to swine facility about
their pumping of waste onto saturated fields.
1998 (_April) — Show Cause Hearing.is held with University officials -and DWQ staff regarding
the improper management of.animal waste on their farms.-
- 2000-Qune) DSWC cites -facility foz _inadequate-storag5-in_s�vine_lagoons-observed=during
-- - -
- - --aperattonal reviM. -- - - - - - - - - —
* The WSRO facility file also:documents-several complaint calls alleging application of waste
onto fields resulting.in a discharge to the nearby creek.
8- The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
Central Office. Review. and Processing
—S 100.00
16 hours by investigator for investigating and
drafting report(s) @ S22-27/hr-
= S 356.32
Mileage @ 0.31 per mile for 71 NLiles.
= S 22.01
1.0 hour by Water Qualin- Regional Supervisor
for review @ S 37.00/hr.
= S 37.00
1.0 hour for clerical support @ S15.00/hr.
= S 17.00
Total
= S 330.33
9. Type of violator and general nature of business (i.e. individual vs, large corporation):
-\,-ioiator is a public educational institution. Facilin� where violations occurred is used for
research.

10. Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent. or restore) or recalcitrance:
Operator reported on April 24, 2003 that all su-ine had been rerrioved from field #_3 and sold
and that the field had been planted in oats and clover. He stated that the swine had also been
removed and sold from the pens in the wooded area along the creek.
Operator stated on April 24, 2003 that the irrigation chain and reel had already been repaired.
Operator spore with WSRO staff on April 30, 2003 and reported that the waste level was now
below the maximum liquid marl; in all structures.
11. Mitigating circumstances:
The operator stated that the irrigation reel did not retract properly due to a chain slipping on the
pump/motor. This facility alro had a previous discharge in 1993 due to inoperable equipment.
12. Owner of property where the discharge occurred:
NC A&T State University
13. Pictures of discharge (optional):
Digital photos depicting the discharge violation are attached.
14. Assessment Factors:
a) IWC: unknown.
b) Receiving stream: Unnamed tributary -to South Buffalo Creek, Class C I\TSW Waters of the
State.
c) Damage: None observed.

CERTIFICATION PAGE
I CERTIFY THAT THE INTFORMATION IN THIS REPORT IS TRUE TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
M. Melissa Rosebroci;
Environmental Specialist II - WSRO

+t �r W AT
F�V�
7
7�
�k
CERTIFIED MAIL 7001 2510 111101 4778 5697
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Dr- Ray Mc Kinnie
Administrator and .Assoc. Dean for Extension
NC A&T State University
Department of Animal Science
PO Box 21928
Greensboro_ NC 27420-1928
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Naturaf Resources
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Enforce
Complaint Investigation
NC A&T State University° - Porcine Research Laboratory
Faciiitv #0401-
Guilford Countv
Dear Dr. McKinnie:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 25. 200;
This letter is to summarize the violations observed during a complaint investigation performed at NC
ALT State University's porcine facility on March 28. 2003. Melissa Rosebrock and Sue White, with the States
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) ',A'inston-Salem Regional Office (Vi'SRO) conducted the investigation. Mr.
Donald Ford (operator), Dr. Charles Radzere (animal science department chair), and Mr. Richard Phillips
(technical specialist) were also present.
-The March 28, 2003 visit was -a result of a complaint received by our office from Mr. lay F- Hackett,
alleging that his cattle had become ill and died as a result of "hog waste from the lagoon that had run-off-" He
also stated that waste was currently being applied and that `waste runs off into the creek every time they spray."
Or. the date of the investigation. Staff observed and recorded the following violations and concerns:
I. At the iime.of the complaint investigation DWQ stair observed that animal waste was being applied
to Field #1 (irrigation pull rr2). Although the wheat field was well vegetated, a discharge of animal
waste was observed running off the spray field and into a wooded area. DWQ staff followed the
discharge downhill and into an unnamed tributary (UT) to South Fork Buffalo Creek (Class C NISW
waters of the State in the Cape Fear River Basin). The -unperrnitted discharge of animal waste
from the sprayfield and into waters of the State is a violation of your Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP), deemed permit, NCGS 143.21-5.10C, and NCGS 143.215.10E.
The xvaste irriQanon equipment did not appear to be worhing properly on the date of our
investigation. Per Mr. Ford. the chair, or, the reel had slipped. causing the hose and gun to not be
retracted properly. Th- waste application equipmen: needs to be repaired or replaced immediately in
order to preveni an unperrnitted discharge in tht• future. Failure to ensure• that th,. irrigation
equipment is over ated properii- is a violation of tlae deemec permit and CAV'W- ,
f Dwision of Water GuaS,vrb'Jater QUH!TtV Sectio^ �;85 \Naucntown Scree.
NC 271,07 :3J6)'7..460j ,.us -; Service
Sr_-D o_. -774i
� 96 �Q ram/

ir-
NC A&T State University
April 25, 2003
Page 2
3. Dissolved oxygen (DO) readings were also taken of the discharge stream as well as
upstream and downstream of the discharge. The discharge DO was measured to be 3.32
mg[L (32.3% saturation) while the upstream and downstream DOs were measured to be
8-45 mglL (87.8 % saturation) and 4.74 mg/L (49.5% saturation), respectively. Water
Quality Standards for Freshwater Classifications state that the DO for this surface water
should be no less than 5.0 ma/L. You are, therefore, in violation of the NC Water
Quality Standard for dissolved oxygen.
Conductivity (a numerical expression of the ability of an aqueous solution to carry an
electrical- -current) was also .measured and recorded on site. The conductivity at the
discharge area was 990 pS/cm, while the upstream and downstream conductivity was
100 p S/cm and 830 p S/cm, respectively.
4. DWQ staff also noted that Field #3 (pulls 1-4) was not available for waste application
due to the pasturing of swine in .this field for research purposes. This field was also
denuded dueto heavy animal traffic. The CAWW states that there -:is to be adequate
land on which to .properly apply animal waste. Considering the recent pattern of chronic
rainfall, it is.strongly recommended that the swine be removed from Field 03 and a crop
established so that this field is available to receive animal waste as soon as possible.
5. The waste level in the second stage lagoon (#2) was observed to be 6 inches above the
maximum liquid mark and 12 inches from overflowing. The waste level in lagoon #3
-- - (waste=storage pond)-was=-even--with_the--maximumliquid_mark;_Failure_to maintain the
:: —_ waste ie_v_el_ below hrnaximum-liquid-mark is -�a violation--of-xhe_CAWMP deemed -
perm�t�.aitd NCGS 143.215.10E. - - - -
6. The dam for lagoon n2 was observed to be damaged and in need of repair due to vehicle
and/or machinery traffic during wet conditions. Failure to establish a _protective cover
on lagoon embankment is.a violation of the CAWW and deemed permit.
The Winston-Salem Regional Office is considering recommending an enforcement action
against you for the above referenced violations. If you have justification that these violations are
caused by circumstances beyond your control, or you have an explanation that you wish to present,
please respond in writing within ten (10) days following receipt of this notice. The Winston-Salem
Regional Office will review your response and forward it to the Water Quality Section Chief with
the enforcement package. In the absence of any justification., the Regional Office will recommend
that an enforcement action be taken against your facility. Be advised that North Carolina General
Statutes now provide for penalties of up to $25,000 per day per violation as well as criminal
penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.

NC A&T State Universitv
April 26, 2003
Page 3
Please address your response to my attention at the address shown on the letterhead. If you
have any questions concerning these matters, please contact Melissa Rosebrock or me at Q36) 771-
4600.
Sincerely,
'/—A
Steve M uney
Acting Water Quality Supervisor
cc: DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement unit
Guilford County Natural Resources Conservation Service/Soil and Water Conservation District
Rocky Durham — DSWC MRO
Jerry Dorsett — DSWC V4'SRO
WSRO Facility Fifes
Central Files
w Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Sig ature
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ., ❑ Agent
■ Print your name and address on the reverse X irk ❑ Addressee
so that we can return the card to you. g, eived jy (Prrnie me) C- Date of Delivery
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits. -g "J
1. Articie'Addressed to: D. is delivery address different from 1? ❑ Yes
IF YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
Dr Ray McKinnie 't
Admin & Assoc Dean for Extension
NC A&T State U - Dpt Animal Sciencf
P O Box 21928
Greensboro NC 27420-1928
3. Service Type
—;e!�Certlfied Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.Q.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ yes
7001 2SIO 0001 4778 5697 11�1 6V
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-re-0835

c N{ A j E Michael F. Easley, Govemor
�O R William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
`v OG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Cn q Alan W. Klimek. P.E. Director
' Division of Water Quality
April 25. 200;
CERTIFIED MAIL 700I 75I0 0001 4778 5697
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Dr. Ray Mc Kinnie
Administrator and Assoc. Dean for Extension
NC A&T State University
Department of Animal Science
PO Box 21928
Greensboro, NC 27420-1928
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Enforce
Complaint Investigation
NC AST State University - Porcine_ Research Laboratory _
Facility° #064%_ L�
Guilford Counn,
Dear Dr. McKinnie:
This letter is to summarize the violations observed during a complaint investigation performed at NC
A&T State University's porcine facility on March 28, 2003. Melissa Rosebrock and Sue White, with the State's
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Winston-Salem Regional Office ()AISRO) conducted the investigation. Mr.
Donald Ford (operator), Dr. Charles Kadzere (animal science department chair). and Mr. Richard Phillips
(technical specialist) were also present.
The March 28, 2003 visit was a result of a complaint received -by our office from Mr- Jay F. Hackett,
alleging that his cattle had become ill and died as a result of "hog waste from the lagoon that had run-off." He
also stated that waste was currently being applied and that "waste runs off into the creek every time they spray."
On the date of the investigation. Staff observed and recorded the folio%vina violations and concerns:
1. At the time of the complaint investigation DWQ staff observed that animal waste was being applied
to Field nl (irrigation pull Jt--.2). Although the wheat field was well vegetated, a discharge of animal
waste was observed running off the spray field and into .a wooded area. DWQ staff followed the
discharge downhill and into an unnamed tributary (UT) to South Fork Buffalo Creek (Class C NSW
waters of the State in the CaDe Fear River Basin). The unpermitted -discharge of animal waste
from the sDra-vfield and into waters of the State is a violation of your Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAVG'MP), deemed permit. NCGS 143?15.10C, and NCGS 143?1-5.10E.
L The waste irrigation equipment did not appear to be working pronerlon the date of our
investigation. Per Mr. Ford. the chain on the reel had siipped. causing the hose and nun to not be
retracted properly. The waste application equipment reeds to be repaired or replaced immediately in
order to prevent an unpermitted discharge in the future. Failure to ensure that the irrigation
equipment is over ated properly- is a violaiion o ' the deemed permit and CAWMI.'_
X.: _ Division of Water GuallivNJaier Quality Semion 5a,,- Vvauonumn Stree: v:'insmn-Sate~.. NZ 271,G i.»oj 77 •4bC:: —' Ljs:cme. Service
ac-0 62-..-7748

NC A&T State University
April 25, 2003
Page 2
3. Dissolved oxygen (DO) readings were also taken of the discharge stream as well as
upstream and downstream of the discharge. The discharge DO was measured to be 3.32
mg/L (32.3% saturation) while the upstream and downstream DOs were measured to be
8.45 mg/L (87.8 % saturation) and 4.74 malL (49.5% saturation), respectively. Water
Quality Standards for Freshwater Classifications state that the DO for this surface water
should be no less than 5.0 mg/L. You are, therefore, in violation of the NC Water
Quality Standard for dissolved oxygen.
Conductivity (a numerical expression of the ability of an aqueous solution to carry an
electrical current) was also .measured and recorded on site. The conductivity at the
- discharge area was 990 µS/cm; while the upstream and downstream conductivity was
100 pS/cm and 830 pS/cm, respectively.
4. DWQ staff also noted that Field #3 (pulls 1-4) was not available for waste application
due to the pasturing of swine in this field for research purposes. This field was also
denuded - due -to-heavy animal traffic. The CAW1vMP.states that -there -is to be adequate
land on which to properly apply animal waste. Considering the recent pattern of chronic
rainfall, it is strongly recommended that the swine be removed from Field 1#3 and a crop
established so that this field is available to receive animal waste as soon as possible.
5. The waste level in the second stage lagoon (#2) was observed to be 6 inches .above the
maximum liquid mark and 12 inches from overflowing. The waste level in lagoon #3
(waste storage pond) was even with the maximum.hquid mark. Failure to.maintain.the
waste level-lael_ovn_#he=�aidntium_liquiid-=mark_is`a=violatior►_of-the-GAW 0,--deemed.
,permut,:an�TICGS 143 215.10E. - - -
6. The dam for lagoon #2 was observed to be damaged and in need of repair due to vehicle
and/or machinery traffic during wet conditions. Failure to establish a protective cover
on the lagoon embankment is a violation of the CAWMP and deemed permit.
The Winston-Salem Regional Office is considering recomrnending an enforcement action
against you for the above referenced violations. If you have justification that these violations are
caused by circumstances beyond your control, or you have an explanation that you wish to present.
please respond in writing within ten (10) days following receipt of this notice. The Winston-Salem
Regional Office will review your response and forward it to the Water Quality Section Chief with
the4enforcemen€ package. In the absence of any justification, the Regional Office will recommend
that an enforcement action be taken against your facility. Be advised that North Carolina General
Statutes now provide for penalties of up to $25,000 per day per violation as well as criminal
penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.

NC A&T State University
Apnl 25 2003
Pane 3
Please address your response to my attention at the address shown on the letterhead. if you
have any questions concerning these matters, please contact Melissa Rosebrock or me at (336) 771-
4600.
Sincerely,
Steve M uney
Acting Water Quality Supervisor
cc: DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Guilford County Natural Resources Conservation Service/Soil and Water Conservation District
Rocky Durham — DSWC MRO
.Jerry Dorsett —DSWC WSR0
WSRO Facility Files
Central Files
• Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item a if Restricted Delivery is desired.
• Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Dr Ray McKinnie
Admin & Assoc Dean for Extension
NC A&T State U - Dpt Animal Science
P O Box 21928
Greensboro NC 27420-1929
A. Signature
❑ Agent
X I ❑ Addressee
SUeived (P'nt me) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from it m! 1 ? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7001 2S10 0001 4778 5697 V
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02•M-0835

4D Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil. and Water Conservation
O,Other Agency =
Type of Visit S Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine © Complaint,s�:O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 41 12 Date of Visit: 03/28l2003 lime: ta3i]
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
❑ Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farn, Name: .......................................... Count.: GuillfQzd...................................... K'SRQ.........
Owner Name: ................................................... NC.A&-1.S1A1tJU.WY9j.�i1X......... I...... Phone No: 334-1.Ct421...
.................................................................
Mailing Address: UPI].itslitt�>x[--Q>f.At�i17 aA.Ski. ���.......................................
Facility Contact:x.l?�rir�rui�..or..3Qnalors ............Title:....... _
Onsite Representative:..1�,at3��x,.l? Pkli�liRS�1?,..�Qxd.............
Certified Operator:Danald.A ........................... Fo1Cd.......................................
Location of Farm:
Gr. .................................................. U..411...
...........I ........................ Phone No:..............................
Integrator.
Operator Certification Number:..44R.............................
From WSRO: 140 east to E. Lee St. exit. Left at top of ramp. Right onto Cedar Park Rd. Left onto Bridgepoint Rd. Left
into McConnell Rd. Right onto Old McConnell Loop Rd. Right onto J'FH Dairy Rd. Farm on right. T
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3G 04 00 Longitude 79 43 36
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
250
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity PopulationCattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 250
Total SSLW 130,500
Number of Lagoons 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges do Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ®yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ® Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated floe- in nal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No
«'ante Collection S Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stnicture 6
Identifier: ................ LawerstaQ .last-. and............................ '�
Freeboard (inches): 12 24
05103101 —� Fl Continued

Facility Number: 41-12 Date of inspection 03/28/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged maskers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ® Hydraulic Overload ® Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, oats, clover
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need "a wettable acre deternnation?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a .lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily. available?
18. Does the facilityfail to have.all components of the•Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis &. soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21:-Did the facility fail to=have-a actively c& fdd-.-operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
—❑-Yes—®
No ---
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question'#): Explain; any`YESranswers and/or, any- recommendations or anyyother, comments.
Use drawings of-facility,.to:better•explain.situations.•.{ use :additional pages.as necessary): ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
1. & 11. WSRO staff (M. Rosebrock and S. White) observed run-off of animal waste flowing off field # 1 and flowing into a UT to S.
+
Fork Buffalo Creek due to hydraulic overload on the field. The following parameters were determined on site: DO, conductivity, temp.,
H. Samples were also obtained for analysis for fecal cohform, total supended solids and nutrients. Parameters and samples were taken
at the discharge and upstream and downstream of the discharge. Onsite discharge DO=3.32 mg/L and the downstream DO=4.74 mg/L.
3. & 8. Getting wash of sediment and waste from pens in the woods during rain events. Suggest moving swine out to establish vegetation
in this area. Operator notified WSRO on 4124103 that swine had been removed from this area and sold.
r' . Waste level in the #2 lagoon was 6" above the max. liquid mark and 12" from overflowing.. The waste level in 0was even with the
max. liquid mark.
+
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melis a Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: II ,I Date:—21 , Z()
n cin Tin 7

..1lity lumber: 41—I2 Date of Inspection 03/28/2003
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes N No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i_e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes N No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes N No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
omments
7. Dam on lagoon R2 needs to be repaired and re -seeded. Is.damaged due to heavy traffic on dam during wet conditions.
15. Field #3 is denuded and is not available for waste application due to the current pasturing of swine on this field for research
purposes, Swine need to be moved and a crop established as soon as possible. Due to chronic rainfall in this region, this field is
especially needed for waste application since it is higher and further from the creek than other fields. Operator called 4124103 to
av that f eld #3 had now been planted with oats and clover. Swine have been removed from thisfield and sold.
16. Waste irrigation equipment is available but is not working properly. Chain had slipped off the reel causing the gun to not be
retracted properly. Operator notified WSRO on 4124103 that the chain and reel had been repaired.
17. and 22. Facility has not been permitted yet.
24. Facility is to receive their annual operational review by the DSWC soon. Operation will be re -checked at that time. Rocki,
Durham with the DSWC-MRO conducted an operational review in April 2003.
his investigation was the result of a complaint call to DWO alleging that run off of animal waste from the Operation made a
eighbor's cattle so sick that thev died. Caller stated that the facility was currently spraying and that the waste was getting into
:e creek.
ions left blank are not applicable to this facility at this time.
J
05103101

Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine ? OO Complaint a� O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 03/28/2003 Time: 1430
j Facility Number 41 12 I
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
E3 Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:...........
Farm Name: NG. A �► �.�.R7CC�>at.�St �1�.X �thR7CXSlJC3 ......................................... County: G.41�I�R1Cd............................................ Y'.S1tQ........
OwnerName: ................................................... NC.A&T..51att..U.njyer .....----........ Phone No: .4-7Ca?,.............................. ......................................
Mailing Address: AgRar.Itna�nit..Q.AriinaaA.S�ietac�.................................................... GXuja5b.QrQ....N.0 .................................................. 2.7.41.1..............
FacilityContact: ............ Title:............................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: C,.KAdzcrg.,.D.,.F1xillips,D,..Ford................. Integrator:
Certified Operator: Douald..4,,............................. Ford ................................................... -Operator Certification Number:2.4403.............................
Location of Farm:
From WSRO: I-40 east to E. Lee St. exit. Left at top of ramp. Right onto Cedar Park Rd. Left onto Bridgepoint Rd. Left
onto McConnell Rd. Right onto Old McConnell Loop Rd. Right onto JFH Dairy Rd. Farm on right. Y
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ horse Latitude 36 • 04 OD Longitude 79 • 43 36i.
Design Current
Swine C'anaeim, Poni latinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
250
❑-Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity PopulationCattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I - I F❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
— Total'Design`Capacity- . .250=_
Total SSLW 130,500
Number of Lagoons 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischarL,es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
Dischanze originated at: ❑ Lagoon ® Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
c. If dischame is observed, what is the estimated flow in eal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential -adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No
'Waste Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ... .....LQ�rez.sta6 .Wasm.prtrtd............... ,
Freeboard (inches): 12 24
05/03/0I �r� o Continued

Facility Number: 41-12 Date of inspection 03/28/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-sitewhich are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ® Hydraulic Overload ® Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, oats, clover
13- Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAVRMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14-- a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 0 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste. application equipment?
r
i
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
I & Does -the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists,,design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis ci soil sample reports)
i
_20,— 'Is-facilitynot in compliance with -any -applicable. -setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
i-- - - - -
21. Did the facility fail to have a.actively certified operator in charge?-
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes [:]No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
,❑ Yes ® No
- —.❑ Yes-- O-No —
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. f
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES -answers and/or. -any recommendations.or any, other. comments.
Use drawings of facility to better:explain.situations.,(use;additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ®Finale Notes
1. & 11. 'AISRO staff (M. Rosebrock and S. White) observed run-off of animal waste flowing off field #1 and flowing into a UT to S.
Fork Buffalo Creek due to hydraulic overload on the field. The following parameters were determined on site: DO, conductivity, temp..
pH. Samples were also obtained for analysis for fecal coliform, total supended solids and nutrients. Parameters and samples were taken t
at the dischar-e and upstream and downstream of the discharge. Onsite discharge DO=3-32 mg/L and the downstream DO=4.74 mg/L.
3. & S. Gettincy wash of sediment and waste from pens in the woods during rain events. Suggest moving swine out to establish vegetatio '
in this area. Operator notified {f"SRO on 4124103 that swine had been removed from this area and sold.
4. Waste level in the'V_') lagoon was 6" above the max. liquid mark and 12" from overflowing. The waste level in #3 was even with the
max. liquid mark.
Reviewer/Inspector Name M
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
05103101
Date:
Continued

_.:;i►y Number: 74 —12 Date of Inspection 03/28/2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent1temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
7. Dam on lagoon n2 needs to be repaired and re -seeded. Is damaged due to heavy traffic on dam during wet conditions.
15. Field m3 is denuded and is not available for waste application due to the current pasturing of swine on this field for research
purposes. Swine need to be moved and a crop established as soon as possible. Due to chronic rainfall in this region, this field is
especially needed for waste application since it is higher and further from the creek than other fields. Operator called 4124103 to
av that field #3 had now been planted with oats and clover. Swine have been removed from this f eld and sold.
16. Waste irrigation equipment is available but is not working properly. Chain had slipped off the reel causing the gun to not be
retracted properly. Operator notified WSRO on 4124103 that the chain and reel had been repaired.
17. and 22. Facility has not been permitted yet.
24. Facility is to receive their annual operational review by the DSWC soon. Operation will be re -checked at that time. Rocky
Durham with the DSWC-MRO conducted an operational review in April 2003.
This investigation was the result of a complaint call to DWO alleging that run off of animal waste from the operation made a
neighbor's cattle so sick that thev died. Caller stated that the facility, was currently spraying and that the waste was getting into
the creek.
Questions left blank are not applicable to this facility -at this time.
0.5103101

"
ml
WIM
14 v - 0 07 ti
It
od

�1� i0y`^' (' rrl r• 'r"k r, 'i r+i a✓ 5 s„•+., `rif'`a,. Jst `^•la.. ;)✓ t"..:'-:�i',.J+�.n -,7 �,:
S, •' �A �.}''ter 1��J� i��ii ,�r`+ �x.,l�� i%� ��, �� M, 1,i\.4 _ �.• �.o '!-� 4d - J'Lsf� \ Y'- ji .'i.:_ •�• s;' :1'`1 CYfI si'•4 iyl� i�h/�. RyiS"[ r
1 " t �� �� � ��•� �I , J i � ..LL � e.Yl �. "EK ��� .� p l i/ �' tt�.\ 7 q +. � � � . [cam. � ><!}'s /,4• 1
4 J r€�' •� 5w , ;i1}s�� rF.. s ,�,>. 1 ,.tsy '�j•. � ;,+.R.:,,,,ray , �a;\11 y csk ��r f :;i , P i�lt�.
. J . r}� S r�' � h.; 7 •r�r � Jf iLwt'1 y� b �}sk i aL 'r i � �, r; }J+ {�t.
'{+t.A ` j-ft,Lt= �� < ></k'�,�t °i ,s 3!`a�-.'�i�l'Jt.T � a �A�.,�•:�s��. ��1r s�� 4 �t''y;."Y '�'`� ��r i_ � ,J •' � y' � ° r,�r. ra R?' 1 r!
1. � `` •'I �1 J ■ �j �. q k'! r �y..,tf.y.�{Wrt F� T` ��i4 r- ['r Y r ! �-L - +A,r,J: -P� {rr'�� 1., r ,�4d� ri k.fAysw r y+� 7 x�1� ��., tJ +
i•;s 1 t sl �-5Y i 2�'5� _tr�'r .v. I;r:f. lj„i,y �Yx r�r!ii 7iA�'4er+ r''y,s`1 •, r, , y f� � "�s 'Y�r! .� �� � ,ar';l ,"P y"i' �.✓'J". y:l�.: { l,m :lai.
+° i',.? h'- rr ., �, „r5. .. e�' •,r !� ji k� fy� "M�.:,{tYy, . s �., : } .'•1 . r ;iTt.,r + rr I. r•;s.s'.•O j:.:.•y Rnl, ^•s 4 f >,Y ;?''�y '',
n .r1Z i ]7 s,,,t 4., _-,� ,, d� y. s", nl s f� ,�.� � 4 ? +r r 11 '.a` ".S^r�F st ri:; i �� S ��F"• � • i a...r ti.0 d. t•`•ti\ r' '<,4:fh t�e'�y `-r�3.n yt �t:
rp �, i,t e}'t,t'r S � �,t ��y'•i.,. � � s, a�i- r f� ��- x 5 F*p Y'� ,*. "� 5Y�- _' tj ,ir�Y' n �s i
Ili •:Fkksr. f-;vJi�"; �`•�'.pr.s� r'R J15,.h'S:�" + r Stl }�! ea,,1, '{�.lrp 1 '�.1,, 'e•
, �, .r-�•:,.� r:, �ia c�"a� , `"
J
Jt�i "N T .r h;i•ill .� °! .Si-i F,'--� �'�, r-!R' i "�J , t:,�y{, i% •'�,,, x �i! i ' �'rti j'.'. �J• t f ! y_. } T e , e R .sa � A,�k,.,h'u- ,.r f.'4. . r � ..'!•
',i ",ti-�.';. +.,�'fy�i J,�:•'�bX{��!fis.,' � 'ii 4r �+rl.;i!?�• ✓', 1's,t�Y:�, ?^r.. .�,• {':,4. ,1'arF1 y.•4 � 'i Y', 'rli',r'1 iN4i - 4 �� rM'Fr .{.f., ;tF.�„ 1! r� t-? ��'.. J s+>;r
r ..Yx a - �1�d r r,I !r: : i s _{ , y.,`J.-r y 1 1�) ;7. � '+•ra• 1' r .til+�l} �F a ��#
'; �'rl�i S�: i I'fiY'1 r �'�: `.,SfiAV1'�+ti��I •";� ,.tt' 1 ,� r r�'f,��� t �`�� '! �. e w"r��:r:7>}ri,��y, :r��.3''�` � i � ,,tj�;:.,•-,t,•
' kE/{ t #y .�i•TM� �16W � �k :. (S T!;• "t� f rl t i { r�' ,,yt • 1 .tfr5 r.,' •; R"Ty � s r�.. t,'?( 4 � .'t: :, N,�, •1. ,e. a4�t" _''a• ....
f �i '�'t'i� �! vR„�r � + � -11�r c+ .,� r� �y.l s t'�, t �,. p • s �� , ,' • �F%' ' rL ;'t f '� '1 7 .i+,•• 5a r +•�i•'- 't'
�!r�' y t� i J ii a5 i r a :� S3 }` F t, 4 } �,� a.- �, .� E.'-0 i`f,r •'r.:l, r''3i� j`*':
!r'� 'a`F_ -1 P 'n 4•�i"� +iar•. � ��74 �' r i i i'. ii ,1i;: li a r�
� / ti �r- .i .{ 4' ,� � a � }.s {iv -1 r�•s 4Ak j 1 1 � ` 4 1/ a• � `'S sk Z��J 6i 's� .. 55.0 �� fi !
(r r f ::1 f r� }! q t" � :' i. S � � . 'z�i : i, f• r „• SsJ.'S
a tk. kr , fi. -1w 1 i r, ,. . s A r 1, .l 5ti<r �� 'fi'yif.., +.. sri; •.i
-,�i-,-i��l�rJa 5 1.� � G • �� le '' M M' ,i.� f, f s„.:tr y'�tlY r+F!, •. .fir . S.FI t '' � . : �e ! a ,:✓ r u ,�'.�a,:.. � ice' '. ,:: 1.� * ,rali'! rnr
, J ��.r R LLrr�Ct �t i rr".. �, �L,,r ,•4�i I r .s„sa,.• t 'i'ti'f{sr1113'rrl 2;.,` f4.!' #.-c
f�S� }'F' '� .'1'' s, p¢ 1 4��J•r,�•JI �'� �!W J,<%. 'r R, _?i 'ry '1� + S�, 1;,•', •1'aw rat , r'S'':•,: IN .1 a �7 .r �j- :.'
f Y oE-' 1 .•i.'r�fi.{yP; n t I' f � x� ;, A tads''3 4Y.'7 ��- � P 'wtiSr; �k >!. .r ♦ r y1,-. � . 3• .a ,� ..-r 4'�}.. � `�r,r 1 - ,�+Y � -Kr• ��.o-: �' .,7t;".
SY ,�. r. L� v r[• ,'�' k ":�'. �t� 5i i �"J Y ti 15;-? �'-ti--S;L� , �` ^s - a -a. i {. _ �'i - 7 'r✓• � ,. tic.vj. °T..rt:�-' w �'+,. �l�'it�''":r5'r;-' . c '%
;i"•rjg is � { ' I. r `i d � 4„ sr,• 4 `°ri' 4�, .ar ,n,,, 1 F:r• { .rv..,t _ Y r s "
J LY U° t .1Tiry y •ili ..;iF 4;Y ,f+.'rr: 1 iro s:F� I k.✓- q�}"' 4t+�, S f ,,s,,, i, 't. -d ♦- ,y .., r',.� r "°�rpc Re n..:. ,r L� x't' 1 3''r,
•?�. a`:,J : , vK�. i r . Y4 yqs', 11a y r. x x' e t tirh' t rid L eLY.. �y 9E 1 i7
�,,,,, j�am' 'r • - r 1 J i i Y �q '�.r �5+"7 'lr '�� at rt:r L tiyli r +mod 1.�f ,, a_4...1',•1��[[ L'} 4Y�rl.• . Y 1 1:•
y i.;�� sar:L!r.Y.r \.�[j �y�s,��f'c •i j'` •�',� s' '' + t•'; ttSr; y�S�dr='"�. vw A�•:�, � '•• •�
s^ ?��S [`=•�-b E, f.-,� ! V�r r y-lyi� 'J, ir• :'ll .rr. rr, 't-• 'J•�.{ �fLa•`i 4r �, 'J.. ': •3.i rA rw .?r Li:f:
'•xr r.�'s.yf!'JJ,l,.: s y fry!f !1'S'd 1' 1:,t1� r :y +. t rr T- 4 s. + r t� q• �' �"1' d l}, ty ,c,'h �a' +f, �,.'.f
�,jpgpg•,, .il ''�!4 {� i �I,y t ` r y "L_ 1,.,• r 4 a:,,+:..... `Jy r,>a.'�;t: ., 5r .r +
9r" .Lr�+r•4r t.•�-r.� CF,S��',}'y.r, F,r )(sa •.iS / '{ r,.�, ',.2' fi. n 4• •Y�„'.,' t i:.1',',:}, a "�.. P /� r
4 ,,'•11,..t1? -f'1.} r J�lx ST',a f it 4's 5,�Si••-�,rl..: .�,�4' Mui"�}.�,�,i �;p'�3,pr�sF� Sri4:y..`� �� iJ 1�:�. .• � �.,+�„ r ,• ,� t yr ': i T r «dr Y,.. #�- r M�, •i 1 e. .n rs t .I.� Y S?e f �.
n :� < t �.�,y -.�' I..,. ) f 5 •/n•i ,.J'^ �_ ti r �
r iw i•.r. t4 47r R ss:,5 L [ `'✓, ;� �. �y '\ � � , /.'i .!rsSl. r t �7 .3t ii .r'� :_ , r x ➢,{. .5.�'a •A� .
-'M +...� ••c.v�i Jia. .r`. t.. .l r�,.r..R ,:+d•
s?4�•,>ri �rrfuf �41 {S, _: i 7 + ttts '�{r li'•r, S 4 � t,. y� / �r `•fr ��.' i,��'�- . �' `'�.l �'•' �''�iL�'r�� "��'�st�,� .-^,J ,�r.rr- .t�r�' .;,,,`'''�
:ir ti .{,i='-{s t"�rf �i� r'' ��'! ,&'i. {,•:, a.. =• r.,ra�'if
4 `a4v 3 to:lr L r S It! t Fr !I lyds J_ a a K .{.y •S,
r; i:L}.14 ��;5 `:.� ::.{ [' >x,vs r 3 r �,, �. 1 R , p, s tf rN: e � ._±1 y � rlul.. "• `i, w'1�,. J �1 }t',' va. rtY�f IFj'a:a �;':r, a .: 4'�.4 .. • �t.
y ji .� � •i. �' S ' i 4 " r ��, l:U; l 1 � '�.• F i i • C1. yy�x,x �'[' : � -� �,e,.�
it L +.e. �� l!i� f 'ii.. r• „'rsy�.� �: f �b 5y ,1•t. t(t �l, + t ;:.f`,,,� r.r ,lt ,i;a.. - ��; I. i 1R!,' : �X.. .�p•�•;� •„h"4 �tr, i.l tv�;'„�f.M1� ,4 .`41 tr.�� .ii'1`fi4 s., ��75-I 1'. i�Ef .f• ' p.s '1 "r}i1�H 4tl+;,r 714 Sri r !',"'.ie•`�,•e'v, .�'Fa�,,�p/��sf }r.�4:r; !1 =,... M''fT'' .lri , j
��rY. ��. r.a r .r t I •,•1r �r ;ais �'• i \ k s+ a4,{ � ,sr' sf;' ♦ .•`.,'' i" ��i"�" pi4pr ,�. �f +� 4 r � r �t•dr.��*.fir.
�r lt', �k:• ~'ba`'.�:`[:;�i"•,i t� F s• i5 a;'/�'. i9 ; 3'�«� tY `�;`.y f.+'J rr{i ]t.'.r ,`+�1 a '6t �,�.�Va trEr. �r S.'i �l�sti3"l �.P.rpw. �.-i.�y��`Fw, rs;'i:k.��;i+k ��
i'fi: �., ,yr � , �y; r �.J..1\� �1, ,1E. �� .•�4',: yy �• Y, r,..„ ri- 5,�+ V• ,+r A(, ,6 4:I�..ti,�r.• .1 ,i�±"� �T3 r.-.
1_,,. r_r, rJ� y, e.4 1 ;r3- t S, 11 a. 11 n rir� ;,1 .w x ;- e• ! -*s.�; �'�•' yr' S' c .. �t 7t•'L;ss.•.,•f �aLtr."e.k A't
d'�.:. �. e`'1,i 4 �,..f .. r, r, .�: et s, `.�,� .s �' 4-�[.< �•'; y�P 2 'i LiS, •,i .-.+ nsJ f.w �.� >.: rT .a•r.Ir 6.' =•�• .i,'
�• ^� 4.r,S :+.� t ry. i .. r i k„ ��r a �, s s.,;y,.'1M r q. .^T,`�r, �. x 'r G �'' •r '.� ,rew �' � e: 1: �,� r r'f r j,rt,r }'._,. !•�' J . iv •r :'"..
Sr. i e.'� + r7 A- 'i �s..�•is r.iS, F4� �,w -i t"r •IV yF j � 1 �',Al"
1r tl + R+�� c}1`, R d,-. r3 .a 1 _,•'< -�! � r'.r, '. ,�- i.fL„ �4' i •,F;
"l�F �: �F-". r••+�,;;,�:}'i't;"rrt .v; 4t � hi'. 31•l �'L,i.ti� r,r-. i�� r�." .y.''�4•r'�r �„i+A.-•'j.•e. N .Y I, ��,r...�.r�rsi ,r� r• .fdr��' �lr .Y s I.,��S:T�'�=
.{`= _t ;ti '[ ,4-, S;. lsSt ��' •"Js J1 t ,.T�,,,,� .�.. 1.�w S,^ '1 Y.,'..r !`•'• �T �tr. •';. .a ,�I:'?r +.4r :1; ' :�,:�'� �-1�'a, ^,','
x, •i', .�?`;,, l;` ,. � .1, r� f�l 4 r S+ �, L,;Y;:t ,g'fs s j, �� s,'1.,1 - f f' ,iL "` d _ , t, t . t
. i�rt, it 4 e /1'.ti -�s ,,s f r,�:\ r f ;a +..-k ..i v 1 +,'�.6 r .'`'! 1�"•`�Pi •'. J'a "r*A,r,.i `.;-%� •�.'I..�t• 37 ' s,,_Jr -i�r�.
i..i,- .L r fr+f.s d.. s,us. r •� }, l r'!!'''��Y•t"i r it r,4� ,3 t5 n�.4"t, , 1�•',i R5'}• � +., .� ��;�.e. 11: ''.t.� ,.C�'., ,. 4�� v� %r.�ifs,li ti
�.?n r r, a Ea ♦f Y �;�'w k �. e{ 4 tY"�J. ,(�.'i*.�,� .f, - s .•� 1 n�4-w .l y,.•1i:.•r:, rti 7 ��.r r 'f:?i, �' ,•, r Y ync,._,ii
�9 �� �.fl•r#+'rY ��, ,, ��f M,j YAr , � • •..j;� ;L, rJ :l t ! i =1u;( ?s�ryy al,l.rR �. i'� " i' s � ' is', r i.� , ! v , . 1'r , I r . � y y.;,;,'. ��'N ! r, e� r. Wd = �r� y� a ,r { rr e� J,-,
,r.«.� •',. ��:.5 5 .5 1.5.fi i �},a�,,r �•yJt i s tgp 4 y�, _t .,.1,, -q �i � � z , s.. ."�3,.' .'' '°� ''- r �:1. •r: r:i;'
,t• �.��i � }.�'a ;e. , s�ry�j L �":ry .�' t..�. �i7�• r�x k -a�` ,/•• �•�r'•,rir T '.t <i.• r r::,, ='r.�;i+ h � S�. L�'a,:'l. .
i �N IiL:li_fiYl:' � r� , i ,r ,r 'ate ,:i.� s �� �,•�s� sr -. ° y'f ter. s ,, ,•F:�. s '.:ti.iw f1}y',ri!Y "T e' a !!.�'" 14-'{tr. 1y_ »(-:
»� :"5:�<� I, r'r.:`a ,.1„ � ,]. fi r .ri.r•••.-•.. * .•SG +�•,"�h r'r-.d'rl.-.,•. •" "f
�' -�:; ��• ' F.:t '>•1'''l t4 � z ��C � •;STi-'.� 5 ' t• 4�:.,, ' �'f . Via! s'"" r!• ��-1^• ' :I' 4;>. • x f ;7,i,,6 I`•I,M"� ' t,- s . >~ �t: K � f ":: �' �, , p r 'k:' �s
�;•>"i• ,1: r?•rl.r•,<[�',� '41. �x.y,.i fir• :, .f i�;;j.. tt, �r:' �x 1'3� C �t r ,aza. .ti,�t�lr„'�,'a�'MS �y�1' rJ 1.[,e"r:a
1.1..'ti*'.
f; LKJ' r xilr t ,jr •+�J} x�r r rrr . f,'i r, , ,s. °' 1 ' pd
;;, r w �.. ✓, u r iy 4J � 1 ,e. F � Y},: - IL Jry, itl r'. �1 ••+i � .,� � 1-r
` , 3 ..�+' Sr , i�iq+�asa;• # _i �'1 �"ti•,. '`�r, '" -'' �. `',{,`�•,�, +�� r�.!,{• �y�k� rr
:! �J �•. w 1.:1 a' ,`, +} yi�+,1, , njl r -r A �'�e .Ip.e
W�.{tS + � 1 « , •5a � a5r i,.S( � 4vra�
,ass, { �• J r.,� �; 'W F+ X �, , r6y. y, � +. { X � L "'t u[c�,1,t{ r:•.15 � �,,�,`�'■t '
f e� , '+ a , V ,.,�'��1 i L 'i 4 � e{l'S`,�fi+r�r• �s t r�•7 r rs�r k '�r�r�t A7,` �A
a,,}
rywU y =•+F c'y 1•+ . s`r, [ u .• , J.a`!ts`0�'!Y bit
r k i S r a t ,✓ f yrx �1 t r M s; �,.,rt V •.i`
l ,r C 5 , wFfr 5,19
t' + w K x Y+�'" g � 9 � fJty.' 1 s - !� ' '•�Y1 �,n
tY
�f � Y }. a , M � r l . N� L'� 'Lr}-hh "� AM •a` t :i. rFtr-.�eY!'L
+ i t , s •' f } u l je�' a r(„ • + �i : .t la,�„'�,�Su 1 Y a,-s4�t� i } 1 ! +{ H i�+'
�f �.,,•'LJ •r, d..' f '.'al �'n rt s s.. _ Y''•tt•r,Tr�ryet csl,\ } yy- rai,•
5.rr � '•�t ^+.it l�`� JY?,'] Ld lf� t r 'ram•• .it"!''
47.
1J�+ s is 4 ;r �, ci' S�•17 I t �' i ,:err Y S y., C
err. car. J!'r itCR �! t✓- Si ASM
2 1 i�t� E r.,st, , i ( r i �" . �' - r yY �� ✓''4' � +:'L � y1 r� r�'f" +tr ' {r j i yfi Set s �•
`p tr 3w'll i(
rri. wrY # sy •."1'
l � r3��}�j' S1 •A� rrt l rr I��i'�,s,, "i! •,l� r . r ,,'re1�•.•LlLB ��f. r) r�f,4. !4 �'aia .t,ra` " r �sK.',,r' s yl'Vt4r0q�.4': �
't n i a � a" r , . ��u " ► � � si �'r� 4 # ,i 1�9; idl}}' [.sue �/f'�Sr^?''([' r. .Z} a •7 L '?-" 4r'iti �, u� �� e!
`L is y r'4F r 4 �` ,q`'I+,i+(+kt �"f�r,•?d asS NW tit4,,.E,tyrtr 11 irr La i'.'�
;.y"fM. { '3 C r y -'r+, c y ,r V w� 1 }i q�i+J• s+ri,S,r'r. Y.rf Lt•>.tr ',b °b4' s.•I`'%`t�`
1✓ � � r.5 ` ` r r, f` S i a rs'V M L +�L 1, '` • f
J p« I- }�, .tF' r, t 4 - • ,s y �r
I ,.l L +.j♦ Al r i �f V FJ �+ � 1i 1�,{r` �'j- � WJM. a'i� rio- �,b +.:
11: } �y I�l t ty i •w�
1 -t ff Y ` y.� 4
:'�; •1 1 /��Ty fry fn �✓}� r 1 y.,\ it lr as ~ r e•`'►�t `^ . v �A f F '� ��f -, a
! � lts. Yy r?h�jr t' f f � � 1 ♦ fy...4 t14 f.E.
^� 'r jw x t ( ebt b' C ry f�. .s•'L. r r..3•,5;!•
�'4`wi �, r 's. - 2ta A + ^i -M '4
rrr Q jai a , kk ra
i ia,a. 'J.,+ 1 w rk s-n ♦ y5, ';t. - S �S Y S
d0 •. r'n - ,r.a 1-� 5 iJ `t. fr k"' , ttr 'p+��{I:�YR:'�4T�rl
i< Z' 9 r• .! i5' r /'. ' rrr4 L' > sl'• � ,{:'' s r +� j i�'t ��k �, {�i�a � ���.� r IJ i � r 1 jr� i+�r 'i J��.� � ro 1 •���jr,;rli,« !�� �'�"�,L";��' ��4 . L'4s�"1y�i q
yrw flr �,. e r it l sf l a t �! sr+ Ay73fi�(Yi1 r .i 11
7 i �Tr � t � � � .�k•'1�
yd � N r, '.Sxar� Y+ "tr+•�,� fps.
r I a �,fti��-!'� yi_ '�t•!a r4�1'fY9"' rat r
tr , r i l w S , . F <. j•'G i �f 'r� f ,'� ca: `+ ! ,LrC'
f: 1 tr n 13-N.
}�'r,, 114.'r,� E y�.l• i 1 rF ii \ r i ;4 1 1 uf.• r�-� 1i.r �� lJ 7Py'i% �[.t"
r dt !ri ( '}{, �w .p u to • 7Je rt [,.{taJ rrJ �if14Rf'1.
fS •rr>' if e l ti \,ai �t 9 J� •rn :E � rrr �Fi:( 4f
�!r srl +iI1'!'i•5 `' i ,{ • 11 ! Y, � ,r1' s Y, .-, �91 i � "u� d' r k
s�a+
a ir1 r i _' Y y r" 1• '?•+1?'i a i))5 ,, �•"�7'� d �'^ �1
"W.rKf S Ya ^'� f X? . r� a ' r 4 � 1 R - D. � 14;`a;"r ti 1'i q ly , .•at , Z'( Lt 1�,
!:AS
,q.i: +•'� .
,�' j�' �:l,R � i7 y'�'P S�LC,•lrr If r11r;Y� i1 �si'1r �� � �lr•. 'tea t s AvI•,F�� r.��{,' •r '
.Yee i s •. a-, E �7' t�, r- J{ 1'r i a
w ,�, lff.f t�,. ti, �Jrl� !%�, � �iri,`i"•C 1' I x" �� rf ,� :y�lri '� �r�j n�' 1 J�, 1 ���� ��y� k$`
� . 'P {+ G � k� �F ., f. i!„4 n rs�yr 1. �ifJ �•�,.� 33r L Lr' , y a �. 1 i. ` S�f r'
"�„ Q,11 r ! s,, S *�1[} 4�," i -i�ir5 •x'r],ri - ;11ar r f+Y['f. d, i.74•fr ,,a .r.
,jtk V , •'�,E•j , C :, itr Jf 4 � ( tji _.,//etiLr:.
r s;, rti >. 1 1 Rlj �,,,i,a ��,3', .r,h ,1 ,i Aa j � r.✓'• r it94 !' `rfj.,7'
rrr `I Y �-• `'r r�� �'�'� • F lY itS t b-'t ♦ ?.fw •(��,�4'��rt �,.

04
wolods

DWQ Writer Quality Sampling Results Summary
NC AM' State University Porcine Research Laboratory, #41-12
Guill'ord County
March 28, 2003
Umtream of Discharge
Biological Oxygen Demand = <6 nig/L
NI-13 as N = 0.02mg/L.
TKN as N = 0.50 mg/L,
NO2 plus NO3 as N = 0.29 mg/1-
P: Total as P = 0.04 Ong/L
Fecal coliform = >60, 000 col/100 mL
Dissolved oxygen = 8.45 mg/L
Percent saturation = 87.8
PH = 6.7
Conductivity = 100
Water temperature (°C) = 17.2
Total suspender] solids = 8 mg/L
Discharge:
Biological Oxygen Demand = 84.3 mg/L
NI-13 as N = 64 ing/L
TKN as N = 74 mg/L
NO2 plies NO3 as N = 0.55 mg/L
P: Total as P = 40 mg/L
Fecal coliform = >60,000 col/100 mL
Dissolved oxygen = 3.32 mg/L*
Percent saturation = 32.3
pH = 7.42
Conductivity = 990
Water temperature (°C) = 18.5
Total suspended solids = 86 mg/L
Downstream of Discharge:
Biological Oxygen Demand = 61.2 mg/L
NI-13 as N = 44 mg/L
TKN as N = 52 Ong/L.
NO2 plus NO3 as N = 1.8 mg/L
P: Total as P = 26 mg/1-
Fecal coliform = >60,000 col/100 nil -
Dissolved oxygen = 4.74 mg/L*
Percent saturation = 49.5
PH = 7.38
Conductivity = 830
Water temperature (°C) = 17.3
Total suspended solids = 13 mg/L
* Denotes a North Carolina in stream water quality standard violation. Discharge DO reading was obtained in discharge stream uphill from the
unnamed tributary.
Ae ►valer quality standard for dissolved oxygen is 5.05 ntgll (average minimum).
The human health standard for fecal colifbi-in is 200 colonies1100 girl (maximum).

CI)FF19011��L US
4� Postage $
♦ti
S
Cartltlad Fee
Postmark
Return Receipt Fee Here
CO (Endorsement Required)
0 Restricted Delivery Fee
O (Endorsement Required)
C:3 Total Postal Dr Kay MCKInme
`n Sent To Admin & Assoc Dean for Extension
ru NC A&T State U - Dpt Animal Sci
Apt: 4 p O Box 21928
or PO Box Nc
r�-
criy'siere, zr Greensboro NC 27420-1928

Certified Mail Provides: t
® A mailing receipt
Ie A unique identifier for your mailpiece
® A signature upon delivery
m"A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
Important Reminders:
® Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail or Priority Mail.
m Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
a NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
* For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece 'Return Receipt Requested", To receive a fee waiver for
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is
required.
A For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the
endorsement "Restricted Delivery".
n If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti-
cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
PS Form 3800, January 2001 (Rover5e) 102595-01-M-1049

UNITED STATES POSTAL S
JrJR14,9 .Pogtage.&-Fees'Paid,
• Sender: Please prot`yQEr hame, address, an'a ZIP-+4-1
NC DEN
Water Quality Section -
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem NC 27107-2241
� %tlVLD
Of ENNA
APR z g 2g93
i WinstonSale,
1111 till$1111111111$111111111E1111111111111E11111111111111711 ' '

■ Complete items 1, 2, and '3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
Dr Ray McKinnie
Admin & Assoc Dean for Extension
NC A&T State U - Dpt Animal Scienct
P O Box 21928
Greensboro NC 27420-1928
A. Sig ature
Xa_�A ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. er ved y ( Print e me) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from i 1 ? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
` Certified Mail ❑ Express Mailr
❑ Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
7001 :2510 0001 , 4778 5697, 4 oV
PS Form 381August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-10•OK

Rr:c,r'IVED
DIVISION 01'WA'I•l';llQUALITY N.C. De Pt. of
('.hnnl,Iri 1.al,nr alnn Hrpnrfl VYrrrr VnnIH+
4V SAKIPI,Fi7Yf'F; APR 17 2(
r'r711N I Y GUILIFORU PRIORI I_Y_ �'''�
RIVERHASIN: � ANIHIFNI � QA 1x F SIREAM 0 ]iF111-Urm
�� Orton-&
illa'gltl7u : 4VSRO Regiona1Oflirc COMPLIANCE 1•x I CIIAINOfCUSFOIIY LAKE I
real C
(10"r : C) 17N0:VClzNCY V1511,q) El GSWARY
ff11,LC('Ifrt11.C1 54Ylllll: �T � 1
W'Num1vt : :11V1901
Dale Receivc,f : 3/31/7(03
'I bne Rrcrived : 9:45 AN1
Received By I11M
Iam
K 4-�IIS
I)ala R cased Aft
F)alr 411417ix73
F. rr6nRlyd ROD It—r': Srrt Jinn Lnrrtlnrc: VNI REAKI-W A & r
Srrd: S'hlrnlurtlyd: Itrru�rp,;
SfrtflnnN Ftar llrpin i)!hundddJ l7lrrr l;nd f„lnunlddj 'F imr Beeln j'ilmr End Ilrplh-IlA1.IfR,fillp! rrtlnr lJl,r - a. n, I. t:nlllhnlltr-r, s,n Sernplr'IJpr
2fk1.g1328 IfilU [! _
_
IS[117�It1 n1S�
_
C r,lllnrnl: A13'• I'ry nl 31Aih �tktnll
Colifnrnl: h1F IMA 31.14" /Ilk1nd
_--
�.
Cnlifnlm:lutrreca111615 _ /Mml
('nlih,rm I2,,CMSlrrp1t67.1 /107nll
Residue: I nla[ 5(f0 m / I.
Volatile 505 _ nit /L
Mxed 510 rnr/1,
_
Y
_
Residue Suspended 5,'W a n1 /1.
Vula lile 535 m ,/ L
FrxCd Slfl rng/l,
_
Ip I •141.1 Units
Acidlh• In 114.54.16 m /L
_
Aridil5' In pi S.1 435 Mg/ 1.
_
Alkalinilytopf18.3415 w µnlg/I.
Alkali id y to pl14.541U�
1 OC 680 m L
FurbitIM 76 NIV
Colilmm1 otal Iuly /10011115
*4
runtntr.N I � ;
Chluridr'11❑ nll,/ 1.
_...` _
Chla: Irl,12217 ug/F.
_
_
Chla:Cm0221"
Cnlur: I rurHfl c.u.
Cnlnr: ,! I fit I I^ C.R.
C'nlnr. pl 17.6 H2 -r.u, _
- -
_
Cr.j:Qu 720 m •/L
_
_
1A t1uriJc_95_1 rnL�
rnnvaldch tfe 7111H11 m • I_
Greasy and Oils 556 rrl ,/L
f Iardflc55 'I ilta[ 900 n1 L
Seed lic Crwd, 95 unibos/on2
WAS 38260 ml`1,
Plicnn1s.2710 ug/L
_
5ullalc9i5 u11;/L
_
Su[fide745 rug/I.
T
Ourun
lanninhUi nin up,/L
_
NexavalentChrnrllium ug/L
Uirarlxlnalc. mg/L
_
Cark,nalc ju +/ 1.
14113 as N 610
0.07V
en
IKNanN625
0.50
n17;/1.
X
NO2 [+Iva N0:1 ne N 00
0.29
lou.1.
.0
1•:'l,,talns1'6h5
0.04
Ing 1.
r': Vls.;dyed a%1, 466
Illy/I.
K•I'nlasslwu
tu' I.
Cd.Cndndum1027
ul;/L
Cr-Chtn_nfiunr'lolal ]OM
_
ug/L
_
Cu. CopperIM2
uf;/1.
_
NI-Nlckrl IU67
u[,/L
_
M, I cad [051
T
tig/L
_
Zn• Zinc 1092
ug/L
_
V-Va_naJiunl
/L
Ay,-511ecrIU77
_
ug/L
_
Al- Aluminu in 1105
u61L
_
Be. Beryllium 1012
u /L
Ca. Calciunl916
mg/L
Crr-CobaIt 1037
uE/L
Fe- Iron IG15
vb/L
_
I,1-IMRium 11.12 ufv
Mg- Klagmsiunl 927
Aln•A1an •anrsc IU55 a+/I.
_
029
I;, --Selenium 1147 urlL.
I I,;• hIvrcurX7l9lkl
Ba Harlmn ug/L
_
(v)f�arinCllln71r1C 1'eslicitIcs
_
U1 'anu +hus llnlrus Pesticides
Acid ! icrbicides
Rase Neutral& Acid lixtractableOrganics
1 [111 Diesel Ran e
l'ur cable Organics VOA bult[c rc 'd
I VI I Gasoline Range
_
Iill I HIEXGasulineRan c
_
Ph yla lanklun
3

DIVISION O, FiNV� O`N AIENTA[. I�1/1NAGRAtLNT WATER ALIT U B rORAi (I)M111) `
COUNTY V U+.� O PRIORITY AMPLE TYPE yj
RIVER BASIN iLne P Ci r ['�
RCPonriO: AnO f110 1110 RRO WnrtO Wlrir Srt TS 1_IAMRIll ❑ QA' C�iSTFIEnr1 ❑ ErFi.UrMT
AT BM jy[ r
Other COMPLIANCE I,pj CIIAIN tl ❑ LAILE ❑ INFLUENT
/ OI° CUSTODY
for Lab Use ONLY r
Lab Number;
Unlc Receive�0—
Ilcr.'J by_ l—&-(/�Frnrn_ �us uric Land Del
UA7A ENTRY AY;- CK:
Shipped by: Roe Puri , Stnll, OlheT 1-1EMERGI_NCY ❑ESTUARY 1
COI.LEC'fORIS): s���- SC�h i [�• � y�� p.,I Il
} M STATION LOCATION: L T L► 1* T
Eltlmated BUD Range: 0-5/ •25/2 G5/40-130 or 100 plus —
Seed: Yee ❑ No - ChMrinateJ: Yr.e❑ No REM1lnFtRS:��r�u`� tJT� i{r1i1rJ
///III �-- �•-
S1nUwt Dntr Begin (yy/tnm/dd) 71me. 11eglnl Dntr End Time Cnd(Deplh bh1 DF! b1lM Valve �'ypeA It
1
BOO5 310 Ing/I
�
COD Itigh 340 mg/I-
,2
3
CO1) Ln,v 335 mg/I
Colllorm: MF F'ecal 31616 /100m1
Cnlllorm: M1tf Tntnl 31504 —� /100ru1
G
Colilorm: T,tbe recal 31615 T/1001111
i
Colllorm: Pecnl 5trep 31673 /100ml
- - —
a
Ilesidue:lotal 500� mg/1
Voiallle 5D5mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
ei' 1due.- Srrspe.nded 530 -- mg/)
1
12
.--
Volatile. 535� rng/I
1.1
--
fixed 510 - — mg/I-
pit 403--- trolls
..��
AcIJHy to p!1 4.5 436 mg/1
- 15
lei
Acidity to 1) 8.3 435 rng/I
17
--
Alkollnlly In pit 8.3 415
Alknllully In pit 4.5 410 mg/1
1
—
TOC 680 mg/t
20
—
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chl a: TO 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 u�/I
—
Pl,eophylln a 32213 ug/I
Color: Trur, 80 PI -Co
Colnr:lPll--- 83 ADMI
Color: pit 7.6 82 AMI1
Cyanide 720 —�— ntg/l
Fluotide 951 Itrg/I
formaldehyde 71880 rng/I
Greane and 011a 556 mg/I
Ilnldnp.sn rolnt 900 mg/r ~
Speclllc Cnrtel. 95-. 011hna/cm2
MOAS 38260- --- mg/I/I
F'henolc 3273C1 � ug/I
51111a1e 945— Inrl/I �-
SrrlHdr. 74fr rnq/I
UAIE REPORTED:- ---
NIM as N 610
TRN ne N 625
NO2 Plus NO3 ns N 6 00 x _ mg/1
1': Tntat at 1' 665—nrg/1
1104 no P 70 507-
V: Dissolved ns P 666
—
01-Codmhun 1021 up/I
Cr{,l,tmnlurn(Foia11031 uu/I
Cu,Copper 1012 ug/I
NI•N1dna ]067 ug/I
7_n-7.lnc IU92-------ut1/1
—
1ln Silver III77
AVAluminurn II05_ ug/I/I
Re-Il¢tyllinin 11112 �� ug/I
Cn•Cnlclu,n 910
Cv-Cobnit 1037 ��-- _-- trg/I
Fe•lrorr 1045 �+- ug/1
epn>,ilr Snmplc I'
r s It c;Nxx
�___-- _ _
LI-LHhhtm 1l32 ugil
Mg-Pingneslurn 927 mg/i
Mr•Manganesc ID55 u9/1
Na•Sndlum 929� ~— mpr I
Arornic-Joln! 1002
Se -Selenium 1147 on'I
Ng-M1iercury 71900 — a4%F
nrpartochlorine Pestleldes
orgn,rnphtxpa,nrns T'rsttcldea
Add IletbEcldc.q -
T1nse/ Neuttal Fxlrar.tahle o18nnics
Acid F:xtroclnhte t)rgantce
I'ur,leal,le Orpsonlc., (VOA holde leg'+RI
- -
F'hytnpinnklnn ----�
Sampling Point S
Cnnduelance at 25 C
Water Temperature r
D.O. mg/I
PI
All,allnliy
Acldlly
Air Temperature (C)
C ! oi�s
1 �' Z-
q c' q.�
� D�
rr118.3 P!1 4.5
pfl 4,5 PFI 8.3
.� p .
2
94
10
3DO It
400 _.. 1
82244 431
02243___ IB2242 __—
20
Sallnity %
PrectPhion (In/day)
Cloud Cover 6
Wb,d Direction 4)eg)
Stream flow Severlty
TurbldFly Severlly
Wind Veloclly MAI
lean Stream Depth it.
Stream Width it.
410
loo
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
UM1/Revi„ l 10/86

v►'
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Ch rmisny [.alra m-y Rep 0111 Water(pialiq
W SAMPLE TYIWF
(:OUt4'1.V Gt111.FORft
PRIORI-IY
lltVERtl,%SlM1:
� A1,111Il:N1- � QA
El STREAM
� EFFLUENT
ItYPORI-T(1 %VSR0 Regional Office
COMPLIANCE CHA[N01:CUSIODY
El LAKE
INFLUENT
011'el :
EMERGENCY
M. UARY
(:U LhI:(:I (ilr(5) Gl4'lill li
j�VISITID �
l�
LbNumber
3W1900
Dale Received;
3/31/2001
Time Received :
9:45 AM
Received By :
I1M1V
Ll 116(o
Data R/_Icaur7 :
AR
Dale Repotted:
411412003
Eminwvd Rt1111tangr: 51a1ion I.ncatlun: DISCHARGE. NCA & T
Serf: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station R Patr Rrein ()ylmmldd) [1s1e End (?1lmnJdd) 1'Ime lleRin Ttme F.nd Depth - DAI, DR, PRNI Value Type - A. 11, L CampmEto-T, 5, R Sample T1 pt
20U1[t128 1555
1K11)310 m •/ L
COD I Ii h:140 vn/L
COO IA-335 m /L
Coliform: MF rmal 31616 100ml
Coliform: MF'Tota131501 100ml
Colilonn: tube Fecal 31615 Woml
Colifornt: Fecal Stree 31673 100mt
Rccidue:Total 500 m L
Volatile 505 in " L
Fixed 510 m /L
N
Residue: Sus vniled 530 86 m L
Volatile535 m /L
_
Fixed 540 m /L
l 1401 units
Acidity to pf14.5436 ns /L
Acidity to pf183435 m,/L
Alkalinity to pi18.3415 m /L
Alkalinity to H 4.5 410 m L
'f 0C 6tS0 m L
Turhi< -t • 76 Nl'U
ColiforvIi Tutal'Tube ]00 mis
Chloride 940 nnpjL
Chla:'I'ri32217 u /L
Chl a: Carr 32209 u L
Pbrn hvtina32213 u /L
Color. True 80 c.u.
Color: II &1 P1i• C.U.
Color: C117.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 m /L
Fluoride951 m L
Formaldehvdc 71880 m L
Greasc and Oils 556 m /L
Ilarclness Total900 m L
SpedficCond.95 umisos/ctn2
MBAS38260 m /L
Phenols 327,10 u L
Sulfate 945 m L
Sulfide745 m L
Boron
ronnin & Li nin u L
Hexavalent Chromium u /L
0icarlxrnate m /L
Carbonate m L
X
N113 as N 610
64
-mStl,
A
TKN an N 625
74
on /L
?C
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
0.55
m L
X
P: Total as P 665
40
m /L
M'04 as P 70507
m L
P: Dissolved as P 666
m I.
K-Potassium
m /L
Cd- Cadmium 1027
u L
Cr-Chromium:Total1011
u L
Cu- CopM 1042
u L
Ni-Nickel1067
u /L
Pb Lead 1051
u ry L
Zn- Zinc 1092
ugjL
V•Vanadium
uv4L
A -Silver 1077
u t.
Al- Aluminum 1105
u L
lle- Beryllium 1012
u L
Ca -Calcium 916
mg4L
Co- Cobalt 1037
u L
re- iron ]045
u 1.
Li-Lithium1137 u L
Mg. Magnesium 927 m L
Mn-Manganese 1055 u L
No- Srniium 929 m L
ArscniCTatalI002 u L
Sc-Selcnlum 1147 u L
II - Mercury 71900 uFIL
Ba Barium v L
Or anochlorine Pesticides
Or ano hos horns Pesticides
Acid I lerbicldcs
Base Neutral&Acid Extractable Organics
TPI I Diesel Range
Pur eable0r anics VOA battler 'd
TPH Gasoline Ran c
TPH BTEXGasolineRan e
Ph 10 lankton

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATE
UALI
fmw
B FORM I
,
oV
0
CWNTY l' U T `^
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPI
+° �eQ r
RIVER BASIN
n{''�
{ !AMBIENT
❑ QA
❑ STREAM
REPORT TO; ARO PRO
RO RRO WaRO WIRO
5R0 S
AT BM
COMPLIANCE
CHAIN
�qOF
❑LAKE
Other
Shipped by: Bus vourle, Staff, Other
EMERGENCY
CUSTODY
❑ESTUARY
`I
�^
11
EFFLUENT
❑ INFLUENT
COLLE4TOR{S): r'a `A n�
Estimated DOD Range: 0-5/5-25125-65/40.13 r 10 plus STATION LOCATION:, �� L Y ` � j I `-'�� �'1"
,,t
Seed: Yes ❑ No Chlorinated: Yes❑ NoREMARKS: l 11i e 1
5latlanT Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) I Time Begin Dale End Tlme End Depth
03 b � 28 15S
N113usN610
TKN as N 625
NO2 plus NO3 us N 630
P: Total as P 665
1104 as 1' 70507
P: Dissolved as P 666
1
BOD5 310 mg/1
Chloride 940 mg/l
2
COD High 340 mg/I
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/l
3
COD Low 335 mg/l
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/i
4
Collform: Mr. Fecal 31616 /loom]
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/l
5
Collfornr: Air Total 31504 /loom)
Color: True 80 Pt Co
G
7
Coliform: Tube Fecal 316I5 /loom!
Color:(pfl 1 83 ADMI
Colltorm: Fecal Strep 31673 /looms
Color: pit 7.6 82 ADTII
8
Residue.Tola1500 mg/I
Cyanlde 720 nrg/]
9
Volatile 505 mg/I
Flu orkte951 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
Formaidehydc 71880 mg/I^
11
12
esldue: Suspended 530 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/l
Volatile 535 mg/I
Fluidness Total900 mg/l
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 U61hos/em2
14
pll 403 units
MBAS 38260 mg/i
15
16
Acidity to pll 4.5 436 rngA
Phenois 32730 ug/l
Acidity to pli 8.3 435 mg/l
Sulfate 945 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pll 8.3 415 mg/I
Sulfide 745 mg/l
18
Alkalinity to pll 4.5 410 mg/I
1 9
TOC 680 mg/I
201
Turbidity 76 NTU
For Lab lisp ONLY
Lab Number.
(/
Date Received;O.Y�3/ Tlrner �(/
Ree_ d__by: From: Bus f24urie !sod Dei
DATA ENTRY BY:
CK:
DATE REPORTED:
_ _
DM DB D13M Value Type
A 11 L
Cd•Cadmlmn 1027
ugA
Cr-Chrenilurn-'rotai 1034
Ug/t
Cu-Copper 1042 — -
ug/I
Ni-Nickel 1067
ug/I
Pb•Leud 1051
ugA
Zn-Zinc I092
Ulr/]
Ag-Silver I077
Al -Aluminum 1105
Rc-Reryllltlm 1012
Ca•Calcintn 916
Co -Cobalt 1037
Fe -Iron 1045
ug/1
up/1
ug/I
mg/I
ugA
ugA
omposlie Sample {'
T�S 11 C O GNXX�
LI•1-100um 1132 ug/1
Mg-Magneafum 927 mg/l
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Nei -Sodium 929 mg/l
Arsen]c:Total 1002 ug/I
Se-Selenlum 1147 u9/1
fig -Mercury 71900 ug/1
Organochlorine Pesileldes
Organophospllorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neuira] (ixtraclable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplanklon
Sampling Point X
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mgA
pil
Alkailni(y
Acidity
Air Temperature IC)
11
pti 5
2
94 G mS
f0 ( U , `-�
3 .�
400 1
822443 4314
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipition On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity MAI
can Stream Depth It,
Stream Width ft.
�3Jf(��
Igo
Q~
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
14

DIVISION OFWATER ER QIIAIATY
APR 172003
f'Lrnd,h� I,rhm rho+ 0rprn}llrafrn 12un1114
lY SAh11'I,li
IYI'li
f(ttif:IV GUML)1E1)
PRIORIl_l'
!`r
�1Zt�I1{�SalCirn
R11'}',IEf1;4Sifd•
Ah111117141 QA
SIIEI:A1.l
ffrce
Itr imi to WSRO Regim"Wfii—
o r-ohWl,IAN(;I: �J CIIA}Nt+l (_U;�ff)I)1'
LAVE.
R.l111,[,i11
„ IJ INFLUIiNI
I l:hn
l l F,nn�rr,r•N('Y VISH lU
1!,ItIARY
t'f 11.1.C1:1 f1111.5) NI IIR(K'K
fill Nundrr
I 1902
I )Mr ltvreicrd :
3/31 / nn
1 ime Refell•cJ :
9:115 Akt
Recei,ed P,•
I IPf%v
ti
I��,ti It,lra�rd
Alt
rime i6-po,o
&I-If2(rl)
IMI,-1,4 RM) !lane,: S1,1hm Inrr: IKAVN51 RFAM NC A &'I'
Seed: !"film Innird: ltcnietk,:
Snallnn a Il,nr chain 1!!1non Idd) f once r.nJ t,ylmn,khq I Inir nrcln I In,r I:ua llrl�rl, -nit, un, unsl 1 V.Inr I}pe - A. n.l. Cnnipn,ue=r. 5, n Se�nl,lo'r, pr
21k73O32fl I t621f
But) ;1to mg/I.
COD f lirh.110 n,g/L
COD Low 115 m ' J L
Cnlilnrm: Mf Fecal 316I6 / Ilklunl
Coli lorm: 1,11; 1o1al3150t Ilkhnl
_
_
Cnlilnrm: tukx Fecal 31615 ItUllit
Colffmal: I'ecal Strep 11673 1 IWnrt
Residue: I otal 5W nog/L
Volatile505 nlr/L
_
Fi.ed 510 mg/L
x
Vc iduc: Suspended 510 13 mg/ L
VolalHe535 mg/l.
_—
N-Lvi SIR ml;/l.
_
I t 403 units
Aciditytop114-5436 _ mg/I.
Acidity to pl I A 14.15 n)g/L
Ali.-,linity In pl 18.3 4I5 mg/L
Alk.,Gnity topl14-5410 ms/L
TOC 690 !n.Fn/l.
Iurbidit-76 N1U
_
Culifrrtu, Iutel-tu1K• '/100rills
4
f Yln1\1F.N IS;
Ch]nride910
_
Chl a: Cun 322(19
_
Pheoplwtin a 12213 uh/L
Color: i rue SO r,u,
Color: ,11 83 +II- C.U.
Color: pl1 7.6 82 C.U.
_
720 ny;/l.
_
_Cvanide ^T mr/L
Fluoride 951
_
_
Formaldehyde 71M) n, /L
_
Grease and ON 550 nil / t.
Ilardncss Tulal9(k) 111F.61,
S+yxificcmid.95 un,Luc/r1112
_
T
KiIIAS182UP oq;/l.
_
Phcnrits 3273U ul;/ t.
Sullalc915 nip/I.
_
Sullide745 mg/l.
_
Boron
Iannln 4 Li nin u /L
11eMaralcnl Chromium u);/I,
nicarlN,natc t❑ /1.
C'arl.u,afc to , L
X
NI 13 as N 610
44
Jug/l.
X
'1 KN an N 625
52
mg/L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 6.10
1.8
nigtL
X
P:IotalasP665
26
mg/L
I" as 1170507 - -- - --- -
- ---------
-- uns/ I,-
P: Dissolved as 1' 666
m /L
_
K-Polassium
m /L
Cadmium 1027
ug/L
_
_Cd• _
Cr-Chrornlunvlolal1034
u /L
_
Cu-Cn, r MI
u /L
T
Ni-Nickel 1067
u /L
I'b- Lead 1051
u / L
7,n- Zinc 1092
a 1.
V•Vanadiun
ug/L
A -Silver 1077
u /L
Al. Aluminum 1105
ur/L
_
nc• Beryllium IU12
uF/L
_
Cnlcium 916
T
mr/L
_
_Ca.
Co-ColiAl11117
u /L
_
Pc- Iton t6IS
try/L
_
LI-Lithium 1132 ag/L
htg- Magnesium 927 mg/ L
Afn-Man anese 1U55 u /L
Na- Sa,lium929 m /L
Arsenic: Iota11002 u /L
Sc-Selenium 1147 uR/L
_
Ii- Mcicuty 719M u /L
Ba_8arlum u /L
Or anochlorinc Fslicides
_
Or ano hos horus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
0acc Neul mI& Acid Extraclablc Or anics
_
I Pt I Diesel Range
Pur cable Organics VOA boille r 'd
I-I'I I Gasoline Range
IP1I 81EX Gasoline Range
Ph (p lalrkton

DIVISION
F ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER
QUAi!�r);PLE
COIinTY
U I
PRIORITY
TYPE
fi1VE.R BASIN Pfl(� Ck
MBIENT
REPORT TO: ARO FROM O RRO WORD WIRO SRO Sk:OMPLIANCE
AT BM
(❑
QA
STREAM El EFFLUENT
IKEI ❑
I
CIIAIN
LAXE INFLUENT
Other
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus ur1eT Stall, Otherl/ EMERGENCY ❑ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S): brow— t�
Estimated BOD Range: 0.5/5-25/25-65/40�-13 r 10 [us STATION LOCATION:_ OU_�%',' } 5
Seed: Yes El No Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No g REMARKS: `}( Law��`�
Fnr Lah llxe ON[_V
Lab Number:
''^^��
Dale Received:V303-3 1 Time:Q
Rec'd by;
Frorn: Bus ours -I land Del
DATA ENTRY BY:
CIL:
DATE REPORTED:
r\3C ) ++ 1'-)1f1e- I
Station' Date Begin (yy^/�mm//7dd
Tl1me Begin
I Dale End
Time End
Depth DM DB DBM
Vnlue Type
Composite
Sample Ty
A 11 L
T S B
C G ({NXX
11
BOD5 31D mg/1
2
COD Illgh 340 mg/I
3
COD Low 335 mg/I
4
Colilotm: MF Fecal 31616 /100m1
5
Collforrn: MF Total 31504 /1DOrn1
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Collforrn; Fecal Steep 31673 /IOOmI
8
Residue: Tntat 500 m8/I
9
Vola llie 505 mg/F
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
esldue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/1
13
Fixed 540 nrg/I
14
pFl 403 units
- -
^15
Acidity to pit 4.5 436 utg/1
16
Acidity to pit 8.3 435 mg/1�
17
Alkalinity to pit B.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkallnlly to pll 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mg/1
,zU
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: TTt 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytln a 32213 u9/1
Color; True 80 Pt -Co
Color(pli ) 83 ADMI
Color: pit 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 m9/1
Fluoride grit mg/1
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
llardne.ss Toia190t) mg/I
Spedrle CCoed. 95 uhlhoe/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mgA
Suffl4e 745 mg/1
NIf3 as N 610 mg/1
tKN as N 625 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/I
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 rng/1
P: Dissolved as P 666 m9/1
Cd-Cadmlurn 1027 ug/I
CrChrom1um:Tola11034 ugA
Cuiupper 1042 ug/I
NI -Nickel 1067 USA
Pb-I.ead 1051 u6/I
Zn-ZInc 1092 ug/t
Ag 11ver 1077 ug/I
A]-Aluminurn 1105 ug/I
Be-Rerylllum 1012 ug/l
Ca•Cnlcium 916 rng/I
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe-]ron 1045 ug/I
Li-Lithlum 1132 ug/l
Mg•Magneslum 927 mg/i
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
Na-Sodlum 929 urg/I
Arsenic -.Total 1002 ug/I
Se -Selenium 1I47 ug/1
IIg-Mercury 71900 ug/l
Organochiorine Pesticides
Organol tux{Arnnrs Prwlk:ides`
Acid Iferbicliles
Rase/ Neutral Exlraclable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA ballie reg'd)
Phytopiankton
Sampling Point X
Conductance at 25 C
seer Temperature
^
D.O. m
/ q
pllAlkalinity
p118.3 pf14.5
Acidity
pit 4.5 pi 8.3
Air Iemlwnlure (C)
VO
O- 3rqS
n 5
i tll•
7 3�
2- Z 2 r
2
94
.
10
300
400 1• _
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity X
Preclplllon On/day)
Cloud Cover X
Wind Direction (leg)
Stream Flow SevedlY
Turbldity Severity
Wind Velocity bi/II
loan Stream Depth It.
Stream WFdth rt.
}�1 d
� C� O
D 5
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
',� /9�.�•I _A / / Cam/ . I 1' , . ..t1�/
DMI/Revised 1

Report to:
W 5 jz C)
WATER QUALITY SECTION
CHAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECORD
NC DEN WUWQ LABORATORY (check one): CT'RAL j ] ARO [ ] WaRO
Page —Lof
For lnvcstigation of:
Sample collector (print name)
and DM-i forms completed b}': 61 55Ca I�1CJ rd� �L Sample collector's signature. r
la) fj
Field storage co itions no location (wh n applicable)
Lab Use Only
LAB NO.Ir
STATION NO.
STATION LOCATION
DATE
SAMPLED
TIME
SAMPLED
NUMBER
OF
CONTAINERS
2--
D I S C-V -r
0 3 03 Z8
/ 5-6 S
2-
D
U q
6 36 3 X
f �'[ �
Z-
t
PP -
2003
R uished by nature):
pjaA�v
Date
303
Time
!�
Rece ved by ( );
i
Date 3
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Method of Shipment circle one): State Couri Hand=de-hvered Federal Express LIPS
Other:
Securit Type and Conditions:
OTT `' t4tJ-; t,§- s0
INTRALABORATOR HAIN OF CUSTODY - Lab Use Only
LAB NUMBERS
FROM ••
:•1
�N
• r
r
r
r
UARM
�r
Sri
QAIFormslSample ReceivingNCOC form WQ 4110101dbs

)J/ ,,AAII
Report to: WATER QUALITY SECTION Page -1 of
CHAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECORD
NC DENRIDWQ LABORATORY (check one): I I CENTRAL I I ARO r.!' `VaRO
For Investigation of: f G
`name)
Sample collector (print
and DM -I forms completed by: Wib�a
collector's signature:
Field storage conditions and location (when applicable):
"Lab Use Only .`
.:LAB NO. . V,
STATION NO.
STATION LOCATION
DATE
SAMPLED
TIME
SAMPLED
NUMBER
OF
CONTAINERS
D.:
D
:k
fi
-
r
APR
BP
-shed
R by si a
ODato33
3
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Method of Shi ment circle one): State Courier Hand -delivered Federal Express UPS Other:
Security Type and Conditions:'
a d by: r J
yBrolcen by,= z
s
P
r
INTRALABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY - Lab Use Only
+� t'LA$Nt1M$ERS`3
?NiJMBER:
x?y +ANALYSES
RELINQCTISHED
RECEIVED
,"DATE
TIME
+FRO1vI
BOTTLES
REQUESTED
BYE
*BY
�r��THROUGH a
_�
'�,
:?\: ....t ..
�.._�.,. °°J�.:'•crt.w �;;
"tr.lrt"_..!^.r ��
-.i3.:-°..t.. �
\.:u (
`r�
,"E, a'9, � $.:
s�,. �:�,'.L.`i..
fi • �
.�'�YrfY. _rr. .:�.nx=x:,r
,�"''•.,e�.s.. �+ _
'
='tK0i...�..'.
.,>f. '�- �
�'-.
�r"•M_sr"�.��-}'r�Y'
`w t� T�e,�
-ii•. L '�.�. �
r^ �' =, -' W'; �y�`
'-`�
-
'
� ��
^PY t'-.: tt'T�v �.
d. r� �.. .�
.:
�.^kr"�'-` e. v a. _ {•�' r
�� �+�`:. .� =. �''�s s
.-Ln .. •'-
_
S � J"r
.Lis G.
Rx. - `si4 .7
s`s.'..?"`'s•-:�!'a�
r ,�
t��, �_
:'y'`a ''i -�'
'Sp,s'`J3 �"`'•a'rs,,£.,z,
i
Fc
afF_� � - .:-
,"fir
.-�1:-t�:...ifs`��i�.-.ter...
IY. �: s. '�- {�.
.,,�.,`�};;"�.`5�7
:la`S+ti �-�9._.3ri:Y-�'i'..eFi�
Yl...�. y';4 B ..y •ir
'wJ
QA\FormslSample Rrceiving=C form WQ 4/10/01dbs

RESEARCh & ANA[yTICAI
LABORATORIES, INC.
' Analytical/Process Consultations
NC DIVISIOIr OF WATER QUALITY
585 WAUGHTOWN STREET
WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27107
Attn: MELISSA ROSEBROCK
Date Sample Collected : 03/28/03
Date Sample Received 03/28/03
Date Sample Analyzed 03/28/03
Date of Report 04/04/03
Analyses Performed by CS
Lab Sample Number Lab Sample Number- Lab Sample Number
473339 473338 473340
Parameter Storet R Results Results Results
Fec CoH -MF (31616) >60,000 col/100 ml >60,000 col/100 ml >60,000 col/100 ml
EC
N.C. ©e.�:. P
APR - s 2093
inston-
fegionai _ ...;.
Clients Sample
Source
--------------------
DISCHARGE
--------------------
UPSTREAM
--------------------
DOWNSTREAM
Number
A&T
A&T
A&T
Time Collected
(Hrs)
1555
1610
162G
r. Cox 473 - 105 Snort o ree_ Ker nersville, North Carolina 272B4 - 333-996-3841 • Fax [phone]

M RESEARCh & ANAkyTiCA[
LABORATORIES, INC.
r
►. ��- �� - Analytical/Process Consultations
NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
585 WAUGHTOWN STREET
WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27107
Attn: MELISSA ROSEBROCK
Date Sample Collected 03/28/03
Date Sample Received 03/28/03
Date Sample Analyzed 03/28/03
Date of Report 04/04/03
Analyses Performed by Su
Lab Sample Number Lab Sample Number Lab Sample Number
473342 473341 473343
Parameter Street # Results Results Results
BOD-5 (00310)
Clients Sample Source
Number
Time Collected (Hrs)
84.3 mg/t <6 mg/l 61.2 mg/l
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept, of EHNR
APR - 9 2003
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
DISCHARGE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM
A&T A&T A&T
1555 1610 1620
'r
90. eox 473 • 106 Snort Street • Kernersville, Norm Carolina 27264 • 336-996-2841 • Fax [phone]

FI
RESEARCh& ANA[yfiCAf
LZORATO&SINC.
Analytical / Process Consultations
Phone [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
WATER 1 WASTEWATER I MISG.
COOMPAN'Y+ (�
JOB NO.
�Qm�Ov jO' J yV��Q� mAr� 2 mac~
4-1
v v v v v
ry ^ ry REQUESTED ANALYSIS
S'f REET ADDRESS
PROJECT
CITY, STATE, ZIP
CONTACT' PH NE 07
SAMPIER NAME (PLE PRINT)
SA ER SIGNATURE
SAMPLE NUMBE
�LAB USE ONLY)
BATE
TIME
CGYPGRA6
TEMP
.0
RES
CI
BEM°ov�o
(Yu NI
uaTwxrye
I3a4YI
SAMPLE LOCATIONI9D.
n
at.
x
u Cre w m -
r
t s
-
✓
,s
T-
3
Lr 2-
a .
15-
1 V1191
v:
1
173
AKLour
R6 I QUISHED BY ,
EIT
RECEIVED BY
Ste-_4ww
REMARKS:
_
TEMPERATURE AT RECEIPT °C
RELMOSHED 8Y
DATEMME
17 `4
RECEIVED BY
"�6 ZLI,��AMPLE
v'

\IA7E Michael F. Easley, Governor
O 9oG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, R.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
C �
April 25. 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL 7001 2510 0001 4778 5697
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Dr. Ray Mc Kinnie
Administrator and Assoc. Dean for Extension
NC A&T State University
Department of Animal Science
PO Box 21928
Greensboro_ NC 27420-1928
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Enforce
Complaint Investigation
NC A&T State University — Porcine Research Laboratory
Facilitv qo*k,
Guilford Countv
Dear Dr. McKinnie:
This letter is to summarize the violations observed during a complaint investigation performed at NC
A&T State University's porcine facility on March 28. 2003. Melissa Rosebrock and Sue White, with the State's
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Winston-Salem Regional Office (VVSRO) conducted the investigation. Mr.
Donald Ford (operator). Dr. Charles Kadzere (animal science department chair). and Mr. Richard Phillips
(technical specialist) were also present.
The March 28, 2003 visit was a result of a complaint received by our office from Mr. Jay F. Hackett,
alleging that his cattle had become ill and died as a result of "hog waste from the lagoon that had run-off." He
also stated that waste was currently being applied and that "waste runs off into the creek every time they spray."
On the date of the investigation. Staff observed and recorded the following violations and concerns:
1. At the time of the complaint investigation DWQ staff observed that animal waste was being applied
to Field #1 (irrigation pull #2). Although the wheat field was well vegetated, a discharge of animal
waste was observed running off the spray field and into a wooded area. DWQ staff followed the
discharge downhill and into an unnamed tributary (UT) to South Fork Buffalo Creek (Class C NSW
waters of the State in the Cape Fear River Basin)_ The unpermitted discharge of animal waste
from the sprayfield and into waters of the State is a violation of your Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP), deemed permit, NCGS 143.215.10C, and NCGS 143.215.10E.
The waste irrigation equipment did not appear to be working properly on the date of our
investigation. Per Mr. Ford. the chain on the reel had slipped. causing the hose and gun to not be
retracted properly. The waste application equipment needs to be repaired or replaced immediately in
order to prevent an unpermitted discharge in tht future. Failure to ensure that the irrigation
equipment is operated properly is a violation of the deemed permit and CAWMP.
N. C. Division of Water Quality/Water Quality Section 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 f336) 771-4600
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

I
NC A&T State University
April 25, 2003
Page 2
3. Dissolved oxygen (DO) readings were also taken of the discharge stream as well as
upstream and downstream of the discharge. The discharge DO was measured to be 3.32
mg/L (32.3% saturation) while the upstream and downstream DOs were measured to be
8.45 mg/L (87.8 % saturation) and 4.74 mgfL (49.5% saturation), respectively. Water
Quality Standards for Freshwater Classifications state that the DO for this surface water
should be no less than 5.0 mg/L. You are, therefore, in violation of the NC Water
Quality Standard for dissolved oxygen.
Conductivity (a numerical expression of the ability of an aqueous solution to carry an
electrical current) was also .measured and recorded on site. The conductivity at the.
discharge -area was 990 pS/cm, while the upstream and downstream conductivity was
100 VS/cm and 830 p S/cm, respectively.
4. DWQ staff also noted that Field #3 (pulls 1-4) was not available for waste application
due to the pasturing of swine in this field for research purposes. This field was also
denuded- due -to -heavy -animal. traffic-. -The CAWMP- states -that-there--is .to be adequate
land on which to properly apply animal waste. Considering the recent pattern of chronic
rainfall, it is strongly recommended that the swine be removed from Field #3 and a crop
established so that this field is available to receive animal waste as soon as possible.
5. The waste level in the second stage lagoon (#2) was observed to be 6 inches above the
maximum liquid mark and 12 inches from overflowing. The waste level in lagoon #3
(waste storage pond) was.even with the maximum liquid mark. Failure to maintain the
_.._ _—wasWlev_el_below-the-maximum-liquid_mark-is=a=violation:of-the=CAWNW., deemed--.--
- - - permit, antic-NCGS-143.215.10E. -
6. The dam for lagoon #2 was observed to be damaged and in need of repair due to vehicle
and/or machinery traffic during wet conditions. Failure to establish a protective cover
on the lagoon embankment is a violation of the CAWMP and deemed permit.
The Winston-Salem Regional Office is considering recommending an enforcement action
against you for the above referenced violations. If you have justification that these violations are
caused by circumstances beyond your control, or you have an explanation that you wish to present,
please respond in writing within ten (10) days following receipt of this notice. The Winston-Salem
Regional Office will review your response and forward it to the Water Quality Section Chief with
the enforcement package. In the absence of any justification, the Regional Office will recommend
that an enforcement action be taken against your facility. Be advised that North Carolina General
Statutes now provide for penalties of up to $25,000 per day per violation as well as criminal
penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.

NC A&T State University
April 25, 2003
Page 3
Please address your response to my attention at the address shown on the letterhead. If you
have any questions concerning these matters, please contact Melissa Rosebrock or me at (336) 771-
4600.
Sincerely,
Steve J_�111 u:;�z�
ey
Acting Water Quality Supervisor
cc: DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Guilford County Natural Resources Conservation Service/Soil and Water Conservation District
Rocky Durham — DSWC MRO
Jerry Dorsett — DSWC WSRO
WSRO-Faciiiiy Fi1e`s7_-,
Central Files

DWQ- - CIVIL ASSESSMENT RENIISSION FACTORS CONSIDERATION
Case Number: DV 03-023 Region: WSRO County: Guilford
Assessed Entity: NC A&T State Universitv,, Porcine Research Laboratory
() Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner;
Notes: N/A
O Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
Notes: No damage was documented as a result of the discharge and resulting DO violation. The
facility requested remission of the penalty because the facility stated that they didn't intentionally
violate water quality regulations and that they have corrected all of our concerns.
A compliance inspection conducted in September 2003 documents that the dams of the lagoons
have still not been repaired satisfactorily. There are fields that continue to be unavailable for use
due to incorrect or nonexistent crops, or that continue to house hogs on outdoor lots. The new
irrigation reel still needs to be calibrated. The facility was inspected the day before Isabel hit and
the lagoon levels were only 3-4 inches below the max.
O Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
Notes: The violation was caused by the failure of the certified operator and others in charge at the
swine unit to abide by the CAWIVIP and permit. The facility has not been "pro -active" in their
approach to animal waste management in the last 10 years. They address problems only after
brought to their attention by DWQ.
{) Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
Notes: No, the facility has not previously been assessed civil penalties by the Division. However,
the facility has a ten-year history of documented water quality violations. NC A&T State
University was issued an NOV in 1993 for a discharge to waters of the State as a result of
inoperable equipment. In 1995 the University was issued a "Notice of Concern" due to parlor
wash, calf feeding, and misc. activities from the dairy and swine facilities that could impact water
quality. DWQ issued an NOV;NOI to the dairy facility and an NOD to the swine facility in 1998
for applying waste to saturated fields. A Show Cause hearing was held in 1998 regarding the
improper management of animal %waste.
O Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Notes: The facility has already purchased a new irrigation reel (July 2003) as they state.
However, the equipment has yet to be calibrated. Most all of the animal waste application
problems and recordkeeping violations are the result of mismanabement --- or lack thereof. The
payment of the civil penalty will not prevent the remedial action from being performed.
Decision (Check one)
Request Denied
Date
Full Remission Partial remission Amount remitted
/16-1- 94,4t_�
Alan Klimek:, P.E.

COMPLAINT REPORT
.Division of Water Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Did caller ask to remain anonymous? Yes No J
(If YES, skip to directions section) J� f
NAME OF CALLER:V I` �icC�CT
a
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE: _C33Co - C9 4
4 n
DIRECTIONS: P/�.� A T L =
SOURCYOF POLLUTION: 0CUU-4"0j`r
NATURE el
COMPLAINT:
camA VAnl n 4'k -e t < n. r 2 S i c_ LC
F]
IA
336
p�
DATE:
TIME: _ / 1 0U � Prn
COUNTY: 6u. t' I
a hrs /7dl.6L1_O n�a 40-1-4d
our .:
in 4-/'D
iOCCG t<
EN
REFERREDUTO: �0j:e- 1-D�C
ACTION TAKEN: l,�. -fY 11f,&U n►'Yl L(9 A -fit-A -fit, t,-
RECEIVED BY: INVESTIGATOR:

Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Complian fe°Inspection —(),Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint., O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 41 �12 Date of Visit: 03/28/2003 'rime: 1430
0 Not O erational O Below Threshold
13 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: N.C.A,9I I.uKclac.Rcsra.rclx.L boxACory.......................................... County: G.ui1forl............................................ MR. 0........
Owner Name: ................................................... NC'..A&1.S1.ate..U.0jVexai1y................. Phone No: 33.4-7.f42......... ............................ I ..............................
Mailing Address: 1?eR�rtlxtcmt.o�.�#t111i[tat.Scleq.Cc.................................................... GxccaaSpoxo...NC.................................................. Z.7.41.1 ..............
FacilityContact: ............ Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: ,.1Cad��xe�.X?...blilllAS�T),.QAd....................................... Integrator:.................................................................---..................
Certified Operator:Doxald.A Doxtald.A .............................. F.0jr.d ................................................... Operator Certification Number:�.4.4.Q .............................
Location of Farm:
From WSRO: I40 east to E. Lee St. exit. Left at top of ramp. Right onto Cedar Park Rd. Left onto Bridgepoint Rd. Left i
onto McConnell Rd. Right onto Old McConnell Loop Rd. Right onto JFH Dairy Rd. Farm on rights
® Swine []Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 1 36 04 00 Longitude 79 43 36
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
JEI Layer
iry
EEIN
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
n-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
250
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
250
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
130,500
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field ,area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon N Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? N Yes []No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway N Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ..... Lwwsez. saagf............Wastr-ptand...............................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): _ 12 24
05103101 _;�,f,a 5L Continued

Facility Number: 41-12
Date of Inspection 03/2$/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement'?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
N aste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ® Hydraulic Overload
12_ Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, oats, clover
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
.9. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
IN No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
F
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
1. & 11. WSRO staff (M. Rosebrock and S. White) observed run-off of animal waste flowing off field # 1 and flowing into a UT to S.
Fork Buffalo Creek due to hydraulic overload on the field. The following parameters were determined on site: DO, conductivity, temp.,
_+
H. Samples were also obtained for analysis for fecal coliform, total supended solids and nutrients. Parameters and samples were taken
at the discharge and upstream and downstream of the discharge. Onsite discharge DO=3.32 mg/L and the downstream DO=4.74 mg/L.
3. & 8. Getting wash of sediment and waste from pens in the woods during rain events. Suggest moving swine out to establish vegetation
in this area. Operator notified WSRO on 4124103 that swine had beet? removedfrom this area and sold.
4. Waste level in the #2 lagoon was 6" above the max. liquid mark and 12" from overflowing. The waste level in #3 was even with the
max. liquid mark.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melis a Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 302/03
05103101
Continued

yi Facility Number: 41-12 Date of Inspection 03/28/2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Rs
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [-]No
7. Dam on lagoon #2 needs to be repaired and re -seeded. Is damaged due to heavy traffic on dam during wet conditions_
15. Field #3 is denuded and is not available for waste application due to the current pasturing of swine on this field for research
purposes. Swine need to be moved and a crop established as soon as possible. Due to chronic rainfall in this region, this field is
especially needed for waste application since it is higher and further from the creek than other fields. Operator called 4124103 to
gay that field #3 had now been planted with oats and clover. Swine have been removed from this field and sold.
16. Waste irrigation equipment is available but is not working properly. Chain had slipped off the reel causing the gun to not be
retracted properly. Operator notified WSRO on 4124103 that the chain and reel had been repaired.
17. and 22. Facility has not been permitted yet.
24. Facility is to receive their annual operational review by the DSWC soon. Operation will be re -checked at that time. Rocky
Durham with the DSWC-MR O conducted an operational review in April 2003.
This investigation was the result of a complaint call to DWQ alleging that run off of animal waste from the operation made a
neighbor's cattle so sick that they died. Caller stated that the facility was currently spraying and that the waste was getting into
the creek.
ns left blank are not applicable to this facility at this time.
05103101