010025_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Division of Water Resoure
Facility Number - j Division of Soil and Water servation 1 /�
0 O Other Agency 1 I" M
Type of Visit: Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation C)Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up Q Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:® Departure Timef7rT_,37J51 County: etegion:
Farm Name: MM NeW I i nt5nro iI- OXIM Owner Email:
Owner Name: 66. V VI u.! %lyPhone:
Li m'% nej--s hi �L
P l �e, . 1� [� a -7 .56 Z Mailing Address: S _� 3 g 7�o�p a _ �
Physical Address: _5 a 4 9 Th o ,� P.�, . Q� �ner� NC— R 7 3 o 2
Facility Contact: I " ran -- Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: I aier. 5 • B S/_ �Z,1 1
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:Location of Farm: Latitude: 3�e ,'�g ' 231 f Longitude: 790
O i& I S~ 7 r'
z- b a S o n2
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer 1 Dairy Cow d
Wean to Feeder I INon-LaXer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation`? ❑ Yes [ iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
ON
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters ofthe State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management systern?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes VN
❑ NA ❑ N E
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit y Number: - • Date of Inspection: ,,3 a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure__ 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Nlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DNN'R
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) �T
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E*o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? ��T"`
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks.or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 5jr<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 0 Yes �iio ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ENro ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 0 No [*#A ❑ NE
acres determination?
IT Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �X<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes N—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need i ovement? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
V
to Ap�Zing
Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis Soil Analysis ❑Weather Code
fal] ❑Crop field ❑ l20 Minute Inspections Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections i�$lodga•9
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ®'1`10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment'? ❑ Yes ❑ No );rA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste apph'cation equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check 0 Yes ❑ No XloNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below. O
WV
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ,&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No VrNA ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes J�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes jN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA [] NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes IN''10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recom endations or anv other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pagrs as necessary) Ka da"4 e'(&d_ l to+ 6L)a'V
e- re,flo-c 7 See .261 ra,n ronti wsp.
Pun o-F e->-P LA�s+e_ -;a fv, 10 +L5�
A C,4A I b rot,4i o n � u e, Vr, 2 1`TX„onw.P Re--heA ? L je a-4- a4—
T - l 1 S Z.y a /
F- & � ll n eAA-5 -gyp be- r,�m ved •�rolnn �n,5��
(st016) t46A� h'o_
a s -+e_ + co "I e4ie-A ? �J
T re-ne,5 ors XOLM- 0- V-- ? p� ,/fit.+ -f �"•
rN1u►�A.-�e-r' S�I��M���tw�"�+✓ s-����Vld�� ��'M-e I
o
Rp
Reviewer/Inspector Name: !L4da 6$e., Phont3—:-
lvql
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date:
Page 3 of . rlI l ' 7 /II 5 . Y '�f oo� l] 2/4/2015
1 . _ .7l17 �- - fn , -7 1ke w / fnnn

Division of Water Resource
Facility Number. - E* O Division of Soil and Water aservation
O Other Agency r
Type of Visit: WCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ?X Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: kIAM0466 Region: Cy�
Farm Name: ty WIL-BUR_ 1V6WLW Owner Email:
Owner Name: Awww mvwo Me-kjL,-N Phone: 376 r 6 1
Mailing Address: �J �j�J�j TH(JJV� M, /v\&aAw NG a?3 0
Physical Address: "? 0 "T{OA M , /�1�Ff M� . fl�L _ _ 730
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: W ILAV R NE W CAW Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: �31 (�
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer I I Dairy Cow p
Wean to Feeder I INon-Laver I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers LLBeef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Co—
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: G- Lo }
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR) Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'?(If yes, notify DWR) Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 16 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 01 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'? 0Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'? ❑ Yes l3! No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
�►
Observed Freeboard(in): �.
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed`? ❑ Yes �0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? X Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Ef No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ICI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement.'
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes TZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
—12. Crop Type(s): UM
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes R] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [] No NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes P�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement'? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes k No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ree oarc� fers `-E�trer Code
am all E]- laekirrgd urve
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? E547 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

[Facility Number: Q - D s ection: 6�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No � NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [% No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fait to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the Kyes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �zf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? 9 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
—Cxttck �� t��P. w t1Dl. Fit P . Cx( s5 LodkS Gz"00 ) -5T Pk col
ChC 5'iczti Fc Sepv�s�rr r, �o� paw � €43ar s- .Aj4Q Q� UOT
nvC- a.oO 4�e�lEfl_�-O Ur;Gf`� mow an CW w5ct'Jc ctC
-- Sou_ SST 0vE 2-a�"? t?�e(—r 5 6(--�k M"e W Ot3ST�U �
rs V p0 imp '� SC QV' � F�I" S^TD�1+r1w 4`T t'TC M
° Sty N e �P ADS WTLOt r> 5 MA�ul IAA
CR.C-6C tS sTI u, "M
f3irh `�, Kls`n epic a„ �� 6 r Fob 1�Jp , wU �tScors/ i
or S�OW`� SlG.1JS a IC
® p �TTe� hOJ�s To S t A.rt� 4�ru�cud WV�t� tNjft-51M
Qua 7L� —,of Or Qv� Q dM\NV_kLL Eve v iU�
5,35 %(torso r L
R&eux- Ats 01PINC41 LSD '7 f µ((6 = 4.roq lbl t 000 C N(
0 pis W t:0 o ONs Folz Pfl ��v
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Rp Phone: 33 6'404,4qa
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ' A Date: �- G
Page 3 of 3 21412015

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010025 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC010025 [] Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Follow up County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 08107/2015 Entry Time: 01:00 pm Exit Time: 1:15 pm Incident#
Farm Name: M.M.Newlin and Sons Dairy Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Marvin Morrow Newlin Family Limited Partnership Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 5338 Thom Rd Mebane NC 273029263
Physical Address: 5249 Thom Rd Mebane NC 273029263
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'58'23" Longitude: 79' 16'57"
1-40 east towards Burlington then take NC 54 exit east towards Chapel Hill.Turn right onto Thom Rd.Dairy is on the right.
Question Areas:
Waste Cal,Stor,&Treat
eCertified Operator: Wilbur A Newlin Operator Certification Number: 21325
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Wilbur A Newlin Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Wilbur A Newlin Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: M lissa Rosebrppock6 L, / Phone:
Inspector Signature: �.� lQ AI Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
7.Today's inspection was to check on Mr. Newlin's progress towards controlling the vegetation on the WSP dam.Most of the
embankment has now been mowed and looks much better.Just need to spray or weedeat the remaining vegetation that
equipment could not reach.Thanks for your efforts.
The marker was re-installed within 24 hrs of last inspection and looks good.Thank you.
page: 1

Permit: AWC010025 Owner- Facility : Marvin Morrow Newlin Facility Number: 010025
Inspection Date: 08/07/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 26.40 96.00
Waste Collection,Storage&Treatment Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le]large ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ No ❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
page: 2

f�
Division of Water Resource
Facility Number - a7 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation '� �� /+
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: L Departure Time: County:A C,LI'Y anfli Region: )5/Z
Farm Name: M M M&ujI i n+ 5no 5 ba; r U FA r yy) Owner Email:
Owner Name: r M rr 01 t Phone: r 376
Ltd a�ntn
- 1�Lailing Address: 3 3 �' R w a , f yl �(�t Yl e t /y G a -7 3 0,?-
Phvsical Address: d2 9 I V e- ern
Facility Contact: vV l I b\L iT n,[--P_llD{ i Ir1 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: W i I bur- lti,P-w i I n Integrator:
Certified Operator: V\J1 I I bu r N6 Ly f N 1- b y
Certification Number: l oZr 31 � �d jS P
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Cj j c) �g Longitude: -7 cj 16 -7
L 4 b C , Hu szI c Tl�,
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow { Z O
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts RINon-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars ullets Beef Brood Cow
urke s
Other urke Poults
Other ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [—] Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: -7 + p
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
( Identifier: 6 P5 n[�
Spillway?: V
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.) T
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 4"Y
es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes C!fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [N�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into dare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes C?l4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes C�,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have alt components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Pq"�Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other;
21. oes record keeping neWw'eekly
provement? ❑ Yes No ❑ A ❑ NE
aste Applica on FreebV12CO
Waste Analysis Soil Analysis []Weather Code
WRairfall Stocking rop Yield Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections y
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No _:E 'NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

L
Facili Number: Q - Jam-' Date of Inspection: -7 d
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes OU�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No M NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [�ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odof or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Dj�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes CRfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
arre-e 6 ' ? 1461 e5 b u r rota Into A 2 5 7_Tt_ee 5 Cu&
5-hro ' t 5 u es-f- ' e-), -1 Lid 1,to Lc , u 0 0
g � � �� � f � 1 #��U rv� cro 55 r n� P
5 rn io>✓� u s e + n off' �- 5 i� c b
' a
a n Fa!I 0
owe J CA a o K-7 a
3 l M vS� POO s F P-PN �a b a
!1$ a F- � �.�- � u G. 1 c 1.l -tom re- e.}ftec"
a , q0 N 000
Reviewer/inspector Name: I JQ Q ro U� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _AjDate: "
Page 3 of 3 21412014

ivision-of Water,:Quallty' ; r y.
FactLty;Ntimbei' - 0 Division of SoiTand Wafclwnservation
Other Agency E,
U
e of Visit: Com ante Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
son far Visit: Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: x'tI Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 1 4/' � � /j/ f Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t; t IV Q4'j (oq/ Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current.
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. '
Wean to Finish La er DairyCaw
Wean to Feeder Non-La er Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry PoultryCapacity Pop. Non-Dai
ry
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ 1VE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes VN
❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters s 1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility 'umber: Date of Inspection:
16 -
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes "NoNA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? es.,❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ ental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? .5& it A,;f Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ YesPI/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C�)r rt S i d' F 0"CA I r ,-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No - ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No - ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Vo [] NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes t
NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili `Number: 01
IDate of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? [:] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
4r [�S on r}�IL ►a2 a � �: � �{�vC �'r�n C:
`T QlL �rC4Crrcll S �1�7"� r1 r pkSf#
W4 vC rCPss d-e S �c�s�m �'0 �►'! �' rat o tF r " j
f� °•�r� �� � r�c�n f- .5'r� aw r���s' �G1"l�y i` S-�����h.-�r�
40O�-t��y r''�.9 l=:of�S �D►clt cj,9 j9, �
F5� ! n ��wl ► ;gyp r�� ��-�.- .S�r�p„-, i o?' hAe1G
`� Qr s�-�•1-r�Fr/�- L� c� sr��e af-r tl Level /(a w s
�14
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: 7 iL�2-c7 C7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �L,,��C/ Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

G - 3 - 000
9Division of Water Quality,
Facility Number ® - r� Division of Sail and Water Conservation 1 /t {�
r 0 Other Agency I A A4
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 9P Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: L 6 Arrival Time: ;53A Departure Time: County: A10 W Region: L
Farm Name: ,r F4-rWOwner Email:
i`V wl Morrou-) p h 1
.1
Owner Name: ' n3�.ls h F uj ( Ud• {Phone: _3 7 In t'•D j `t $
Mailing Address: S- 3 -.3 'j? nk)d J . M p [1��� , �✓ a 7 3� _
Physical Address: �y
Facility Contact: W I bur !v�L�.� Title: Phones- tJ 3-7 b — 3 q 6-3
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: e " rDy
I P-131 �7_b f 5-
Back-up Operator: ^� Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35 . 7 F �3 Longitude: -7 Q [O 5_ 7
1 4 b E 1 H uj y 5-q C: � .� Tho M_ P—d .
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer DairyCow Q '
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer p
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish iLayers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Diseharp_es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: TT
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1K NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: YV ' �PQrd
Spillway?: is{
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are th an immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e. large tree severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ONE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 9 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 1�Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ] NE
maintenance or improvement?
_Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? T
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes (� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): AAJ
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those design ted in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o [DNA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No �NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ,2§'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. oes record keeping need 'mprovement? e-aPpxiate-liox-t+elow- ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[ aste Applic ion [Weekly Freeboard aste Analysis Soil Analysis ans ❑Weather Code
E ���
Rainfall [Stocking ❑Crop Yield mu a Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectionsSludge-Survey-
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? . ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:] Yes [:] No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2 4/2011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: b
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes rX No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes,check ❑ Yes No 17�NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 1KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
97 .
cam, � ad I
0 l C&'P_&� uyi'
h)4"We' QG+ j rc - kv e a utI s c v re'wvy 16 P611 M 010.1
1 Y ,"f V}u(t cm; 4'JC W I)
�1411��� - i'i{� W�)� �� [�r�e►` � �l'Mw d��r7� �� ���,Q.�
Gr ,,) t C-155I �I �r�
<RiaMmGw� �i�3-rfn �i� �` }r�G✓ GoirG� .. IY1fiyll c1 � 'q+k+ +n �[' Gi.7
(�- �� �� `- 0 J('
kft'-1f So�T r vil W i Y'� A- Lw 'l Crl '1
E NU Sbf Ace.- aq
.6 0 = 3 q3 bs . V\� )COO
Reviewer/Inspector Name: R Phone: s a O
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
V
Page 3 of 3 21412011

NOV - aotoj-- P ce ® d vi--q q
E::;W Division of Water Quality =�•Ah
Facility Number ® - Division of Soil and Water CMervation /0 w
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Q NC Region:
Farm Name: r ( U Iv { t Owner Email:
Owner Name: Iq Phone:
Mailing Address: S 3 3% alto M i e.,kan e- r N a 7.3 A �
Physical Address: S~
Facility Contact: W u r 1 y`Q Lt) t itle: Phone: n 1 b -3
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: �� �r Longitude: e[ I � 5- 7
T_ 4b 6 is E I �'- IUNI
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow S
Wean to Feeder Non-La er Dai Calf
EE� I
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Pry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets jBeef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turke Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - ® Date of inspection: *0-7-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No 9NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes lNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 4
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes tXNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
pplication Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. ere any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
U rawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
L I r G +LA /ll N V S he e aao8 j
1 dA �4 P OI ;Ia No
� A
D �
S7 ' 5s N I000
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �✓l e CAL,' Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Facility Number: - O Date of Inspection: Q
Waste Collection& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
OL Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
� Identifier: �\j QS+-e F'O 11
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ` `Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area.
0
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No [<NA ❑ NE
acres determination? �[
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes I)(I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes N'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?I Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes IKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

,�Dt�tston�(ofyWater�Qualit3 , .�� � ,
.a F
�Faclllty Number D/ �� z�fD«ision of�Soil andWater Conse�vahon 's
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit *Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: QM Departure Time: 2.� County: AaMA.4Ce- Region: WsR O
Farm Name: M Al'y)'#1 4- Q1') Ct►r i"eW l+A ei;r J4 glen Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1-J.Ukr �PL"j I I V' Phone: CF) 3-7
]Mailing Address: S33 S 740✓" Ae Im el e
Physical Address: �27 /4 M 911, 11 t r
Facility Contact: _Title: Phone No. �) '3
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certitied Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: ! Latitude: �° 23 I[ Longitude:
414 0�/ s �J � 6 n7� 77 c n pt
Design Current Design Current Design CjUiFehVa
�.
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population' Cattle "Capaci[,P.opulat�on�;
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer XDairy Cow Z C7
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Non-La er -Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry,Poultry
El Dry Cow �?
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers -z
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts ❑Non-Layers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars ❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
,.. ;❑ Turke s � '
;Otheer. ' ❑ Turkey Pouets
❑Other I-. ❑ Other Number of Structures
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes gNo ❑NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued
/1

Facility Number: b r — 2 Date of Inspection Z M
• Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes JVNo ❑ NA ❑NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
. Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1JQ,54to,n
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): !/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? kYes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement? ✓✓✓��\
Waste Application �J
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need El Yes O(J No El NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement? I
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes %--/No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu, Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 1bs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 11sreA f Cd(/t .S sjl�(
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ANo ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ Nox NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes )KNo ❑NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
7, Wdaj� TrkJi Aeej 4 &e- LwT�OA
!� 7; rrD u 1�l r f d✓� C r"i�aWAkin&►.'I
Reviewer/Inspector Name Pq k-rz_k Phone: 036
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Pare 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Z DJ*f Inspection d Z
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ElNA ❑NE
the appropriate box. ElWUP ElChecklists ❑ Design [I Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, Yes ❑No ❑NA El NE
D-/Waste Application Weekly Freeboard
Er
Waste Anal s Soil Ana] sis // ��
Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield Monthly and I" Rain Inspections E7weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes*No ❑❑/NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑No (; NA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes WNo ❑NA ❑NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑Yes ,y❑l No �NA El NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El Yes y1 No El NA El NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? El Yes Yes / No ❑NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑Yes X,No ElNA ElNE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑Yes ) No El NA El NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? ��\\\
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31" Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes *No ElNA ElNE
General Permit? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑Yes XN
o ElNA ElNE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El �Yes No ❑NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
��. Igo Soy _-5u )e- amtl[ b 4f 2ZM D, 'B,e `in "41 5�,1 Sa es
Ly NO D -2ol I - Pc -6)S7
3aeD �4f J n. = S`z6 3.1 �CxVaac.
ZA
rs ,o L4 3 W411600 .1.
Page 3 of 3 12128104

p co._
))�Division of Water Quality 0n
Facility Number 0 aZ S O Division of Soil and Water Conservation ! b �AJ
O Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of visit: a ]Q Arrival Time: �p Departure Time: Ll � Q County: A,J C 9— Region: 1,6'SL6�
Farm Name: SQ,rIVI yYlf,, W 1�#1N1��� iry P4rrn Owner Email:
Owner Name: VV ti l Y V r ly e to 11 rl } I_ _ 40
Phone: 3 7
Mailing Address: 53 3 $ (�c de barn e- , K)G a 73 o a
Physical Address: 5-a 49 ]Yo - J - e onLi l e
Facility Contact: uJ Q r eQ Title: Phone No: 4 -76 3 d
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Mr ®1 ®11 Longitude: [57c)]o []Ed aj
T, 46 GQs-t- D os ley q-q FAjf I j hf bnfd 7th69 k ,
'Far mn o r\ T-i h+ .
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish Layer Z2airy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder JLJ Non-La yet U Daia Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifet
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder y ❑Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Gilts ❑Non-Layers
El Pullets ❑ Beef Feeder
El Boars ❑ Beef Brood Cow,
❑Turkeys - - -
Other 1:1 urkey Poults
❑ Other I I I LO-0—thqr Number of Structures: 4
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes )�No ❑NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
xNo ElNA ElNE3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ElYes [INA [INE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: e7— a e Date of Inspection a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ t,E
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
bIdentifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in)-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes hdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/large trees,severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes El NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drili ❑Application Outside of Area
a.
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
1
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑Yes No XNA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ] No ❑NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: K — as 0 of Inspection I� � '1 Q •
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes L���J No ❑NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes ,No ❑NA ❑NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ��
❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑Other
21. Doe 7ecord keeping nee7;;te
ovement? Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Waste Apglicat n Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis !!!!ll����.. n , ,, A:r. .:/ sfa�C-
ERRainfall Stocking p Yield onthly and I" Rain Inspections 19 eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ]No ❑NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑No [(NA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑No 9NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [ No ❑NA ❑NE
Other Issues
f
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? l(�(
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes No ElNA ElNE
General Permit? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes jNo ❑NA ❑NE
Add' ' Comments and/or Drawings: 6
a a001 56 +e-!5 o2b10 ? C_tM eA 7 NoV `
GWC)6a\A �kG-b*t? 6nAo-m 7 N,&A,-e
i j 0q L 6 D = . c5 145 . N /1006
Page 3of3 q1 !)-I 1b L, s, � S. 3 f 6C• v j00-b 12128104

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number Q J Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit. [11 Arrival Time: o eparture Time: ounty: Region: � 2�
Farm Name: n_��111 � U lu Ur� tq ,�X,ll y V► �QY 4Y� Owner Email: LF)
-�Owner Name:�Q1'yIo NeL ) 10 Phone: 17 G
Mailing Address: -' Olflll 14. i
Physical Address: a 9 O 1r1�1 1 1 TP � e 7
Facility Contact: w i L� _ Title: Phone N( : d
Onsite Representative: r Integrator:
Certified Operator: Lft,)l U e- Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: � ® Longitude: o
S
� E4
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Finish ❑ Layer %Dairy Cow
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Non-La ei LJ Dairy Calf
❑Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifei
❑Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder El Non-Dairy
El Farrow to Finish ❑Layers
El Beef Stocker
El Gilts Non-Layers
❑Pullets ❑Beef Feeder
❑Boars ❑ Beef Brood Co
❑Turkeys
Other ❑Turkey Puuets
❑Other J. ❑Other Number of Structures:
Discharges& Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes jNo [] NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
c, What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: C) —oZ 0 Date of Inspection •
Waste Collection & Treatment VNo
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ElNA ❑NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ElYes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): l-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes KNo ❑NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes E10 El NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement? /�
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑yesNo ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Pondin /g ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground El Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or l0 lbs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) § r
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑Yes 18 No ❑NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes [--] No XNA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes �fNo ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes M No ❑NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: d — X1 • 0Date of Inspection
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes, check El Yes No El NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ElWUP El Checklists /
❑ Design El El
21. Does record keeping need improvement? e1e+�. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
❑`Waste Application L9`Wee y Freeboard El Waste Analysis Ltif Soil Analysis on
[SRainfall �tocking Crop Yield ❑ IS Monthly and V Rain Inspections Bi4cather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ElNE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ElYes ❑No X NA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes F No ❑ NA ❑NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑Yes ❑ No (YNA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes VjrNo ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes WIo ❑NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ><o ❑ NA ❑NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [)(No ❑NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
SC) ts
al� 9109
(moo - 3V P4rt,�
c4 b f&,u 0 IN,0 X,0
Page 3 of 3 12128104

M
Division of Wateracility NumberUL
p1 S `Division of Soil and' arnservation _
0—Other—Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral mergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: °' parture Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: t Owner Email:
Owner Name:—Un 00 Phone: AN 376 - 61YS�
Mailing Address: 3!K 4'1"m 2A MP_
—'T f,3G• a ?, d2-
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: U I( i1���' l� Title: Phone No: — b
Onsite Representative: 3 l eLoti n Integrator:
Certified Operator: I 1 ��1)iT N1C!�z�_t Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ��L Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer Dai Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Non-Laves Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy_Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑Farrow to Feeder ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish El Layers
El BeefStocket
❑ Gilts ❑ Non-La Non-Layers
❑ Pullets ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars El Turkeys ❑ Beef Brood Cow
-
Other ❑Turkey Poults
❑Other ID Other Number of Structures:
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation`? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑Other
•a. Was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(Ifyes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
?. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ N E
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 40 1 — aS , Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes dNo ❑NA ❑NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Struct re 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes *o ❑NA ❑NE
(ic/large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes [*No ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan? tt
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes C4No ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks) ,rr�__(
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement? f'
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ YesNo ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I No ❑NA ElNE
ElExcessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑PAN> 10%or 10 lbs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) ,�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP'? El Yes 1111 No El NA El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination:❑ Yes ❑No KNA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
Comments{refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of;facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages.as necessary):
,T
ReviewerAnspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /.t< Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Ote of Inspection
Required Records& Documents I
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �10 ❑NA El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available`? If yes,check Yes LJ No NA EINE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑Other
21. Doe record keeping neeaecki
vement? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
Waste Application Freeboard aste Analysis 19 SVM
alysis
Rainfall Ucking rop Yield nthly and I" Rain Inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'? ❑ Yes 4No ❑NA El NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment'? ❑ Yes ��r��rVN
``"`` [;(NAElNE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the pen-nit'? ❑ Yes ❑No gN A ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes *o ❑NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑Yes o ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [)(No ❑ NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately �No
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ElYes ❑NA ElNE
General Permit? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [(No ❑NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
a bo so 14 -��s� Co Nple+-ed ,A-5 We I czs 0-06? d 00-j
e.ah b rati o n ?
not ao►o
0
� e g
an°$
C1J
PP-N
12128104

A Ilk
Division of Water Qualit3
Facility Number 9 Division or Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access pp �
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: I n e Region: w
Farm Name: MArvlV14 b_)t Ur NPJ1.J��Y1 rV �Qf LVI Owner Email:
Owner Name: hnnr►r4�j�l���b Ia�n Phone:
�F13 -7 - 0IgF
Mailing Address: ��3 3,l� 10I'Vl l�-[�• I � '�-Kline N� _ 1 1,50 a
Physical Address: I� 7 — )om M • 1 ! to-ban e. Nc 02- ^
Facility Contact: W• F bV Ir Title: Pho a 3 -7ro — 33 3
W 6 � b r-�1 7S ptm
Onsite Representative: V r r vQ�7 �i � Integrator:
Certified Operator: r' A') Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ©o ®I I !� gi, Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ La er Dairy Cow IaZ Q
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Non-Layet 0 Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder El Non-Dairy
El Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
El Beef Stocker
El Gilts ❑Non-La Non-Layers
El Pullets ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars ❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑Turkeys
Other ❑Turkey Poults
❑Other I 1 10Other Number of Structures:
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes VNo ❑NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field ❑Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Ll No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �J_No ❑NA ❑NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge'?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 7
1,910:74
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes �No ElNA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes )WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑PAN> 10%or I0 Ibs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Driti El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) O n r o �Q�'[V 1� _� —Small
11 Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes Wo ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[]Yes ❑ No O NA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes XNO ❑ NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
4.7 16s.. l�l)000
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lr- L Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date: �]
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: t — 5 'mate of Inspection Q
�
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes LK N El NA El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El No ❑NA ❑NE
the appropirate box. El WUP []Checklists [I Design [I Maps ❑Other
21. Doe i cord keeping need im vement? ❑ Yes 12 No ❑NA ❑NE
Doe
Application ;7cropYield
Freeboard Waste Analysis Soi] Analysis rs
�/Rainfall Stocking IJ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections BWeatherCode
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑No VNA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes tN
o ❑ NA ElNE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ElYeso RNA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes [No ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑Yes ❑ No [RNA ❑NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ! No ❑NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? I_
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately I _
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑Yes 0 No ❑NA ❑NE
General Permit'? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) I
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ;dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ YesANo ❑NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
ONO 50,1 re-5 u
O I
�- �A - _ Tr
r , ,�J Ci r��
12128104

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010025 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC010025 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 01/3112006 Entry Time:10:10 AM Exit Time:11:00 AM Incident#:
Farm Name: Marvin/Wilbur Newlin Dairy Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Marvin Newlin Phone: 000-37M148
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°5 ' ' Longitude: 79°16'57"
1-40 east towards Burlington then take NC 54 exit east towards Chapel Hill.Turn right onto Thom Rd. Dairy is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges&Stream Impacts Waste Collection&Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:Wilbur A Newlin Operator Certification Number: 21325
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Wilbur Newlin Phone:
24 hour contact name Wilbur Newlin Phone:
Primary Inspector: Melissa,Rosebrock Phone: [phone]
Ext.383
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectorjs):
Inspection Summary:
9. Need to plug opening in side of push-off ramp to contain waste. Not a water quality problem at this time, however.
21.Operator sent soil samples for analysis in Dec.'05 and is awaiting results.Check next visit.
21. Records look good.
12/09/05 Waste sample=7.2 lbs. N/1000 gal.
Page: 1

Permit:AWC010025 Owner-Facility: Marvin Newlin Facility Number:010025
Inspection Date: 01/31/2006 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle-Milk Caw 120 84
Total Design Capacity: 120
Total SSLW: 168,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond WSP 26.40 36.00
Page: 2

Permit:AWC010025 owner-Facility: Marvin Newlin Facility Number:010025
Inspection Date: 01/31/2006 inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges &Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3.Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed(Le./large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage,etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the pen-nit?(Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ Cl ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu,Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit:AWC010025 Owner-Facility: Marvin Newlin Facility Number:010025
Inspection Date: 01/31/2006 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Rcutine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN> 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Q
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? Q
Crop Type 1 Fescue(Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Corn(Silage)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ Q Q
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? Q ■ ❑ Q
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? Q ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
WU P? ❑
Page: 4

Permit:AWC010025 Owner-Facility: Marvin Newlin Facility Number:010025
Inspection Date: 01/31/2006 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ 01111
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? Cl
Rainfall? ❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall&monthly? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form(NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment(NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT)certification? Cl ❑ ■ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

o •
Permit:AWC010025 Owner-Facility: Marvin Newlin Facility Number:010025
Inspection Date: 01/31/2006 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ E)
32. Did ReviewertInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ ■ 11 fl
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ 0
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number �! Division of Soil and Water Conservation J v A
-- Q Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: C^ f7 Departure Time: ()D County: C Region: Wsko
Farm Name: WarVi Int- \l bur AILLs. l Vl �t_CW_Fanypwner Email:
Owner Name: In ia-i-Ni y Phone: 3:7 (.0
Mailing Address: 53 3 'T Mo owL (s'A• r IV 1t 61-ff 1Q_ , t,-)L- a-_-1 0. 2,
Physical Address: SoZ'T 9- A0 AA R l I Vif' - C-- e2
Facility Contact: r V l V(r N9=tD(l jn Title: Phone No T -7(0 jo
Onsite Representative:
1,JN i EC1 U 1 y�-� k V1 Integrator-
Certified
Certified Operator: I-UOU��`L* 1 h Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ale ®f [�K:p Longitude: ®0 ®, $©
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Non-Layer Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish k El Layers ❑ Beef Stocker
ElNon-Layers❑Gilts I' El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars El Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cot-
Turkeys - - -- - -- --
Other ❑Turkey Puults
❑Other ❑Other Number of Structures:
Discharges& Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ]No ❑NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 I 12128104 Continued

FacilityNumber: — ete of Inspection F7, � •
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑Yes o No ❑NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑Yes kNo ❑NA ❑NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ElYes No ❑NA ❑NE
El Mee/Application ElWeekly Freeboa ❑ Waste Anafy/s ❑ Soil An sis
❑ RainV❑Stockltxg/❑Crop 1 ❑ Month and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ We�r Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes eNo ❑NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑No r$�NA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? � �.� ❑ Yes rV'No ❑NA ❑NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑Yes ❑ No t�&A ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑Yes ❑No VNA ❑NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑Yes I%No ❑NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [' No ❑NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes *o ❑NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
1 -1j4 /05- = T a l bLs.AJI doo re),
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility Number: Q — 0 Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment �(No
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ElYes ❑NA ❑NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑l No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
identifier: PW
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes *o ❑NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes KJ No ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes ((lNo ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes El No El NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes )(No []NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
[:] PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
11 Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes )<No ❑NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes ANo ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NA V NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes O(No ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes YNo El NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
AL
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name I'pc��- Phone: ID
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu . Date: Q(p
Page 2 of 3 12/28M4 Continued

{
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010025 Facility Status: Active Permit: 6WCOIQ025 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ _ County: Alarnance Region: Winston-Salem ^`
Date of Visit. 08/30/2005 Entry Time:09:35 AM Exit Time: 11:45 AM Incident#:
Farm Name: MarvinI il_bur Newlin Dairy Farm _ Owner Email:
Owner: Marvin Newlin Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 5338 Thom-Rd Mebane NC 2730,?,0263
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:35°58'23" Longitude: 79*16'57"
1-40 east towards Burlington then take NC 54 exit east towards Chapel Hill. Turn right onto Thom Rd. Dairy is on the right.
Question Areas:
0 Discharges&Stream Impacts 0 Waste Collection&Treatment Q Waste Application
Q Records and Documents 0 Other Issues
Certified Operator:Wilbur A Newlin Operator Certification Number: 21325
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Wilbur Newlin Phone:
24 hour contact name Wilbur Newlin Phone:
Primary Inspector. li sa Rose Ext.383broc Phone: [phone]
Inspector Signature: Date: 00 I b I os
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
3. Buffer along creek looks great! Fencing looks good.
21. Don't forget to record DAILY rainfall and to obtain 2005 soil test results.Other records look real good.
5/16105 waste analysis=6.9 lbs. N11000 gal.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC010025 Owner-Facility: Marvin Newlin Facility Number: 010025
Inspection Date: 08/30/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
0 Cattle-Milk Cow 120 79
Total Design Capacity: 120
Total SSLW: 168,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 26.40 60.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC010025 Owner-Facility: Marvin Newlin Facility Number: 010025
Inspection Date: 08/30/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
isc„arges&Stream Impact& Yes No NA NF
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 00011
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b.Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c.Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d.Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3.Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Waste Collartinn.Storage&Treatment Yes No NA NF
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes,is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed(I.eJ large trees,severe erosion, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
seepage,etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
closure plan?
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks ❑ ■ ❑
and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste I��icaljon Yac No NA NE
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
11.Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? 0
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu,Zn,etc)? ❑
PAN? ❑
Is PAN>10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn(Silage)
Crop Type 2 Sorghum,Sudex(Silage)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain(Wheat,
Barley,Oats)
Crop Type 4 Fescue(Hay,Pasture)
Crop Type 5
Page: 3

Permit: AWC010025 Owner-Facility: Marvin Newlin Facility Number: 010025
Inspection Data: 08/30/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
}(pasta Application Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Docurnents Yes No NA_NF
19.Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other ❑
21.Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
inspections after> 1 inch rainfall&monthly? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form(NPDES only)? ❑
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23.if selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment(NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25.Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26.Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW0010025 Owner-Facility: Marvin Newlin Facility Number: 010025
Inspection Date: 08/30/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues vPs No NA Nl=
28.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those mortality ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
rates that exceed normal rates?
30.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional Air Quality ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
representative immediately.
31.Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32.Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reAewlinspeciion with on-site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33.Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Division aftWater,$Qualtt} � :. _ x�
IFactlrtf !Num4e Q s ;:Division of Soil Wa and ter consiznggion 3.bt�9 ti
k� 6Q;.Qther.Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ( Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1113010 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: ],(
Farm Name: t�r Vl nc;,- W i�)Qmr N awl t Y1 ri -�&W-'r 11 al: f +,
Owner Name: ar vw Kkou-)1 1 n Phone:
Mailing Address: �JJ 3g iom Cad 1'Yle �Oot v��- IV L a 13 oZ.
Physical Address: PJ_ An
Facility Contact: _ w 1 IOU V_ Y)Title: Phone No:
a r
Onsite Representative: 1N�1,_1 IV}}r IQ 100 0 _ Integrator:
t r�11
Certified Operator: ` I bur �8'j-D U Yl Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: �° ® Longitude: ° ED
-yo s-4 Eas#. k3wV an rn
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ La er Dairy Cow I aQ
❑Wean to Feeder IEJ Non-Layer .1 DDairyCalf
❑Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ D Cow
El Farrow to Feeder y ❑Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Gilts ❑Non-Layers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars ❑ Pullets
- — -- --- - — - El Turkeys El Beef Brood Cow - — --
Other ❑ Turkey Poults
❑Other ❑ Other Number of Structures:
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No ❑NA -❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field ❑Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes XNo [I NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

facility Number: — a • Date of Inspection l
1 04
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes 0No ❑NA ❑NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 1 n tructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Q 5
l r0
�o Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes SIo ❑NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc_) _
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ElOJ Yes o ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental)threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes OR o ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes 2/No ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes o ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application �,
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ElL1d
Yes 'No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes UINo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑PAN> 10%or 10 1bs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C�71rn p r vv` q_aeM& it 12 r ; hq-
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑Yes too--
NA ElNE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination []Yes ❑No *A ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes JW No ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes jNo ❑NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
wQs� �.i� sus � s�� �dos = �. 9 � �s• � f jaao
Reviewer/Inspector Nameare
Q �� Phone: � 7Reviewer/Inspector Signa Date:
I2128104 Continued

Facility Number: EE[— Dief Inspection
Required Records& Documents
M Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Pen-nit readily available? ❑ Yes VNo ❑NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropirate box. ❑WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. D�ojeecord keeping need improvement? If yes. ;�Waste
he appropriate box b w. ❑ Yes L�No ❑NA ❑NE
ste Applicati n Cif Wee y Freeboard Analysis Sz
sis -
q?,
Stocking Crop Yield ly and 1° Rain Inspections Bather Code
22. Did the facciIitylail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes M No ❑NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ��N
�NA El NE
1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes ❑NA ❑NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VN
N(NA El NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El Yes ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑Yes ❑No NA ❑NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes � ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [ rNo ❑NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑Yes No ElNA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by El Yes �(No ❑NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes YNo ❑NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
a a0a 5�{ fe res u

Fi
ivision of Water Quality
ivision of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other [IDenied Access
Facility Number 01 25 Date of Visit: 31312U04 Time: U95U
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered [)ate Last Operated or above Threshold: ..... _._
Farm Name: MgjryiutW1kbi1 r.NCW.U10.Dai>Ly..E;kc Il..................... county:
Owner Name: lYlsr��in �JErilin Phone No:
Mailingaddress: 533.831xQui.Rd...................................................................................... Mgbame...H.C........................................................... 1739Z..............
FacilitvContact: .W..ilburAcw.lin............. .......•Title ............ Phone,No:
Onsite Representative: �Yi141U�1YC]�LIA-------------------------------..----- Integratnr:-------------------------------------------•
Certified Operator:Will uic A............................... Ngt Au............................................... Operator Certification Number:Z1325...
..........................
Location of Farm:
140 east towards Burlington then take NC 54 exit east towards Chapel Hilt. Turn right onto Thom Rd. Dairy is on the right. +
T
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 ' S8 23 Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer IN Dairy 120 196
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ID Other
❑ Farrow to Finish I L Total Design Capacity 120
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars E Total SSLW 168,000
E: Number of Lagoons 0
lding Pondr,/Solid Trains E.
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State?(If ves, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _-._1Yasta.paud.---- --------------------------- --•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•-
Freeboard (inches): 54
12112103 J!f 3 f Continued

Facility Number: 01-25 Date of Inspection 3/31Z0(14
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ic/trees,severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes 9140
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
[]Excessive Ponding [:] PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn(Silage&Grain) Timothy,Orchard,& Rye Fescue(Hay) Sorghum
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ Yes to No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments(refer R question #)i' Explain any YES answers andlor-any recommendations or'an. "other comments:> --'.
lJse drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
3.and 28. At least 900' of stream is impacted with sediment and waste run-off. Operator has put up a single strand of barb wire but _+
cattle are atill getting into the surface water. Must put up additional fencing within 30 days. SWCD/NRCS to visit site in two weeks at
Mr. Newlin's request. Possible EERP site.
23. No 2003 soil results on site. Per operator,samples were taken Dec. 2003 and not mailed until Feb. 2004. Otherwise,records look
good.
29. Operator needs PAN rate for T-1779 F-14 (strip cropped) for hay. Could not locate in the WUP_ Mr. Newlin is using a rate of 255
lbs./A in his records.
2/1 1/04 waste analysis: 5.2 lbs. N/1000 gal.
Reviewerllnspector Name Mel' sa Rosebrock f
Reviewerllnspector Signature: Date:
I Z/I2/03 Continued

Facility Number: 01-25 1)t of luspeclion 1 3/3/2004 •
Required Records& Documents •
21, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ® Yes ❑ No
❑Waste Application ❑Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ®Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑ Yes ® No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes ® No
31. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑Stocking Form ❑Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑Inspection After 1° Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Annual Certification Form
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
',rd'dit"io'Mal men ts and/_o�Drawings: •'
12112103

M ion of Water Qnality
ivision of Soil and'V'Vater-Conservation -
Other Agency.
Type of Visit C mpliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑Denied Access
Elate of Visit: Time-
Facility Number D—=1 -] E3=
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
.rFarm Name: ... .... � Q � ....
Owner Name: ...f..l.Ie1 rv..I. ...... Phone No .. 33 ...:...........�. .. ................
...... ............................... .............. .......
............. ...........
Mailing Address: ........... -------
Facility Contact: LIo 1. �..0 1.V ..1 v e: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative:W-'L.[,bQ)rN..eA.O..[.L.n...................................... Integrator:..................................................... ._...........................
Certified Operator:...............L.�,... �}�....�-' . ................. Operator Certification Number .....�!..L.3 p�
Location of Farm:
❑Swine ❑ Poultry Cattle ❑Horse Latitude Longitude �• �� ©«
Design. W, Current Design Current :Design Current
Swine. Ca aci ' Po
..Po elation ultry Ca aci ,:.Po ulation. Cattle _Ca aci .' Population,.
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy 1 12
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
,•
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design,Capacity
❑Gilts
❑Boars '" ;; :Total SSLW ODD
`Number of Lagoons _674 IF
Dischar es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑Yes "ANo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) []yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes XNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? kes ❑No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? Spillway ElYes No
Structure, Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure
Identifier: ............!.`...... ......... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freehoard(inches):
I2/I2/03 Continued

Facility Number:0 — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to theIlegrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑Yes �No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes �No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑Yes VNO
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes No
❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type r r r _50
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designate in the Certified Anim to Management Plan(CA )? ❑Yes o
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ElYes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below es Nis
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes 1
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional ❑Yes No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments(refer t'�4 estion#).=Explain:any YES answers and/orsany recormriiendatiods or y other comments`'
Use drawings of facility,to..6tter ex
plain.situat>oiis (use addrtional}iages as necessary): Field Copy ❑Final Notes �
o0
-t&A�� lam. W o3 q- n°+
VV-
Reviewer/inspector Name ' '` ,.,:; �..� ( � �,'�' i�-�" _ �-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: jL= Date: d
121.12103 Continued

Facility Number: — of Inspection
Required Records &Document,~
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ANo
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes No
23. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes No
❑Waste Application ❑Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes txo
o
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ElYes
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑Yes No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes XNo
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? Yes ❑No
NPDES Permitted Facilities X'NO
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit?(If no,skip questions 31-35) ElYes
31. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ❑No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑Yes ❑No
34, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑No
❑Stocking Form ❑Crop Yield Form ❑Rainfall ❑Inspection After 1"Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditianal Cotiiments and/oi'Draduings:
AL
e _
qao �.
5 le� 5`Fra nd o-F ,bafJO w t re. ca4 te_ c- --e__
USf a-Ad
t VA 3c) J 5 W C_--1)/A3 Le-25 Me
A_e"
�. �U not ld C_(;_t n w euDk )
I S US It1 r of ASS 14
.1A t 5 re-c-o rA5
12112103

0 Son
on of Water Quality
Q of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number O1 25 "'ate of Visit: 03/13/2003 Time: 0955
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ®Certified ©Conditionally'Certilied [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................
FarniName: 1Y1a�.Y.i�al.�}'xlktur.N� litn.l)airy.kaxtrot.................................................. County: AlgWaac.e......................................... WSRQ......
..
Owner Name: lYlaxYila................................... ),!lwwku......................................................... Phone Na: f-3.7.f..61.4. ...........................................................
MailingAddress: S3. $.Th.Q.M.Rd...................................................................................... Mg.b.Ajjg..NC.......................................................... V.3.0.2..............
Facility Contact: Wilb.m r..Ne.w.1 a..............................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: f, .?C. 9.0 ........................
Ottsite Etepresentative: V}?ilbux.N.e3rlita........................................................................... Integrator.......................................................................................
Certified Opera tor:V}'jjpUt.. ............................. New)jjx.............................................. Operator Certification Number:2.13.25.............................
Location of Farm:
-40 east towards Burlington then take NC 54 exit east towards Chapel Hill. Turn right onto Thom Rd. Dairy is on t�right.
❑Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 •F 58 J F-23 Longitude 79 ' 16 57
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 120 9l
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 120
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 168,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JEI Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps 1 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance matt-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ®Yes ❑No
waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure a Structure 6
Identifier: ......W."e.pond..... ............ ... ........
Freeboard(inches): 36
05103101 #��a ��� Continued

Facility Number: 01-25 Date of Inspection 4 311 312 4 4 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees, severe erosion, J
❑Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? N Yes ❑No
8. Does any Part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes N No
12. Crop type Timothy,Orchard,&Rye Corn(Silage&Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes N No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes N No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists, design,maps, etc.) ❑Yes N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis&soiI sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑ Yes N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes N No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy N Final Notes
3. Streambanks are denuded due to cattle access for several hundred feet. Evidence of waste and sediment in the creek. Need to fence AL
cattle from the creek but may leave crossing and an access for drinking water. Check next visit.
7. Continue efforts to control groundhogs and repair holes in the dam.
19. 11/9/02 waste sample was printed 1/6/03 =2.4 lbs.N/1000 gal. 2002 soil analysis results look good. Need to obtain 2003 soil
samples. Waste analysis dated 1/2/03 =4.0 lbs.N11000 gal.
25. T-1779 F-6 has been added to CAWMP.
26., 29., 30. Not applicable to this facility at this time.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signatulee � , Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01-25 Da Inspection 03/13/2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) []Yes '❑No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fait to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
:Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
AL
05103101

Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
-Q Other Agency . T
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 9 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification
O Other ❑ Denied Access
Elate of Visit: ime: IQ q
Facility Number
�,[ O erational Below Threshol
Permitted JL�Certified Conditionalh CTer1tified, Registered{~Date Last Operated or Above Threshold•
Farm Name: 14.
ayil}�l I bur K>_WIl1') l I�C�f r l`Qrmount, C-e--
Owner Name: � � Phone No:
[flailing Address: � a v &,bar)p— z
Facility Contact: �Ljn `I Title: Phone No: -7(P• 3p 3
Onsite Representative: �l���� 1 v 1� integrator:
Certified Operator: NAt ("Q&J I n Operator Certification Number: d%015-
Location of Farm:
ur 1,r� fan . f 0 .1 n S t. .� S � bl Qn �fgom `
Fo re -
❑Swine ❑Poultry ACattle ❑' orse Latitude Longitude Eal' ® �"
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population 'Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Po ulation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Laver JaDairy
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-I aver JNon-Dairy 9T4 10
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts p
❑Boars Total.SSLW
Number of Lagoons ®: ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Laizo.n Area JE3 Spray Field Area
Holding.Ponds!Solid Traps JE3 No Liquid Waste Management System f1
Discharges R Stream Impacts
1- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑yes No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon ❑Spray Field El Other '
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes ❑No
Waste Collection R Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? )61)illwav ❑Yes ANo
5trucyc 1ot,rd Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches):
05103101 Continued

Facility Dumber: 25 — „'� Date of Inspection Q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion. ❑Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ) �,,,,(
7. Do anv of the structures need maintenance/improvement? �I Yes ❑No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? /❑Yes /KNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level // __
elevation markings? ❑Yes �No
«'ante Aonlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Exce 'v Pondt g ❑PAN MHydraulic Overload El Yes No
12. Crop type XAj A AA A A�A _ V)A Ai-,j-A 1"
13. Do the receiving crops differ with th se designated in a Ce ie Animal Waste 4agenent Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? El yes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? El Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes o
iK
Re wired Records& Documents }
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? El Yes %No
IS. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Was Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP.checklists,design,maps,etc.) ✓ J s / ❑YesjNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/ freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes XNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes IVNo
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or anv other comments,_
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): 0 Field Copv �[]Final Notes
U�-(YYIc/ a
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

0 0
Facility Number: — 5 Date of Inspectimi
Odor- Issues ��
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 00
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes \°o
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i_e.residue on neighboring vegetation.asphalt. ElYes o
roads.building structure,and/or public property) V
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon.'
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts.missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters.etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged
'ti fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Ad onal Comments and/or Drawings-
9 d T - 1-061 F1 u77 5:7Z
-j- 36. NOT aq&'4�
® �a a'y
b
IR If�o 9 Cow j&1D3�
OVJAJ--� � //-PL/0.3 r 4. o. I des . �� r
05103101

QAftsion of Water Quality
4 ision of Soil and Water Conservation
()-Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection OO Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Date Of Visit: 7/18/2402 Time: 14:00
Facility Number 25
t') Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date bast Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: IYJaK.xi�nlWzlbux.�l��Ya#n.[2aAry.1~arm....................... County: t azaat�c�......................................... 1Y..SR.........
..........................
OwnerName: Mar.y.01................................... Ne,.w in............................... Phone No: 3,76.-6.14.8.................................................................
]ailing Address: 53,3,8.Tjhona.Rd.......................................... .......... 1► -041ts�..Aic............................... .. U..30;..............
.................................. ..........................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No:
: ...................................................
Onsite Represent atiye: N.'itlbux..N.tw1ija...................... Integrator:...........
Certified Operator:`3'11buX.A.............................. NQmUit.............................................. Operator Certification Number:z.13.Z5.............................
Location of Farm:
1/4 mile S. of intersection of NC 54 and Thom Rd on Thom Rd.Dairy is on the right.SR 2145 5249 Thom Road.
�y
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ®Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 58 23 •� Longitude 79 ' 16 57
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca acity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I I ®Dairy 120 10
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer L Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 120
❑Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW 168,000
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps 1 JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed• did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DW Q) ❑Yes ❑No
c. [f discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ................................... ................................... .................................. ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 72
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01-25 Date of Inspection 7/18/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the 41nk9fity of any of the structures observed?(ie/tr*vere erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes N No
12. Crop type Small Grain(Wheat, Barley, Corn(Silage&.Grain) summer annuals Orchard grass(hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes N No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes N No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑Yes N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑Yes N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
# 7. Continue efforts to get rid of groundhogs and small trees on the lagoon embankment. _+
Still needs to add T1779 field## 6 to the WUP.
Overall facility and records look good,just need some rain for the crops.
Concrete curbing on the lot corner looks good.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: DI—25 I)0f 1 nspcction 7/18/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
2T Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:
Waste analysis: 5-9-02 LSD 6.8 Ibs.N/1000 gals. B +
05103101

ision of Water Quality
ision of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason far Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
[late of Visit: 2/6/2002 Time: 1030
Facility Number Ol 25
Q Not Operational Below Threshold
®Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................
FarmName: .................................................. County: AM==......................................... W5RQ........
Owner Name: lY[aryin................................... Nmlip......................................................... Phone No: 33.6-3.76-:6.1.48...........................................................
Mailing Address: 5�.3&jhgM.Xid...............................................................I...................... M.,�bAu...I.C.......................................................... 2.7.3.02.............
Facility Contact: WJ1bmr.Nm.Uh..............................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: 33.6,376"3903.......................
Onsite Representative: ..W.ilbt r-Newliut........................................................................... Integrator:......................................................: ...........................
Certified Operator:W.jjb.tkr.A.,............................. N.1mlin.............................................. Operator Certification Number:;Z13,25.............................
Location of Farm:
114 mile S.of intersection of NC 54 and Thom Rd on Thom Rd. Dairy is on the right.SR 2145 5249 Thom Road. +
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude Longitude 79 • 1G 57 «
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Cavacitv Po ulation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 120 98
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 120
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 168,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag_n Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ID No Liquid Waste Management System
DischaMo 8 Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State?(If yes.notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection R Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Wasle.Pomd..... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 42
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: O1-25 Date of Inspection 2/6/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees, severe erosion, Yes IN No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? [I Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes . ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12, Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes IN No
Re aired Records R Dgguments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ® No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ief discharge,freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ®No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ®Yes ❑No
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will-receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question#) EXplaiii"v YES answers and/or any-reco`mmendathms.or any other commentg.
Use'di4iAngs of facility to better-explain.situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
7. Continue efforts to control groundhogs and vegetation. Looks better today. _
& Stock trails need to be scraped to Keep waste from washing off during rain events.
15. Small grain is up, has just been slow to grow.
19. Per operator, soil sample for tract 1779 was taken in December and is not back,yet. All other fields ok.
25. Field 6 of tract 1779(?)needs to be added to plan if possible. Animal waste was applied on this field in September 2001.
Repairs to concrete lot and berm look good!
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melis URosebrock
Reviewer/inspector SignatureU A III A7 Ik J Date: l �-
05/03/01 Continued

Facility Number: 01-25 p: f Inspection 2/6/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
05103101

HAM
'Dt-rsion of WateraQualtty. . . � A
�G Divrsron of Soil and Water Conser.'vation
Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑Denied Access
Faciliri Number Date of Visit: ime:
Not O erational Below Threshold
Permitted y��C,er�tiified [3 C
ondi
ti
onally�Cerrtifi-edL r 0 Registered0 Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 1f� C�I.L VSnI W UU r 1 1 n &rrqunty: la ftqnc<L
Owner Name: lulCJ1�'V11r1 ,k�i n Phone No: �• 37 A ' `"I
Mailing Address: S Uh o, Rd- 1 Q } �_f�J a !-7=3o Z
Facility Contact: [Lit 1 bur 1 VP.Ijoh h Title: Phone No: �] � G 3 7 3 /03
Onsite Representative: n Integrator:
Certified Operator: IL'I 1_ 1 I I— �Qll��IVl Operator Certification Number: f
Location of Farm:
f` FE3Lm 15 on rl
❑Swine ❑ Poultry Cattle ❑horse Latitude Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Ca acity Po ulation C le Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder I JE3 Layer I I IN Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer Non-Dai
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW coo j
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps JEJ No Liquid Waste Management System
I
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. if discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes X No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? Spillway t ElYes No
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches):
05103101 Continued

. Facility —
Number: � Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes No
seepage,etc.) IV
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes KNO
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? KYes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes No
Waste Anulication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes .j No
11. Is there evidence of over application? Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ANo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with(hose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes jll�No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes A>0
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(iel4rrigntivrr, freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? /
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes No
4
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? A] es No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): I Field Copy ❑Final Notes
T
o'76
6. S�/
�-
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: O2
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 0 1— Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes KNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes A No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes xNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? rMO
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Ske tow Z4A AP- J 6..0 J-'q 40
05103101

ivision of Water Quality
F ivision of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency _
Type of Visit O. Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑=Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 7/24/2001 'Tillie: 1050 Printed me 7/25/2001
01 25
o Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ................
Farm Name: .................................................. County: Alamaim......................................... WSRO........
Owner Name: Malryixt................................... ).!test'.tin......................................................... Phone No: 33.6,37.6,.61.48...........................................................
MailingAddress: 53A.3h.Q.m.lid...................................................................................... M.ehmw... G.......................................................... 2.7.3.02..............
Facility Contact: ...I mot;. .om tt[1....................................................................................Title: Phone No
Onsite Representative: yyilbt .Ne�lim........................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:WjIbtK................................... Newlin.............................................. Operator Certification Number:2,X32S..............................
Location of Farm:
1/4 mile S.of intersection of NC 54 and Thom Rd on Thom Rd. Dairy is on the right.SR 2145 5249 Thom Road. +
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 ` 5$ 23 Longitude 79 • 16 S7
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Cavacitv Po ulation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ® Dairy 120 90
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer I ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 120
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 168,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present 110 I.agoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge-is observed. did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ®Yes ❑No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ®Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...... asle.P.flnd..... ................................... .......................
............. ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 54
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01-25 Date of Inspection 7/24/2001 Printed on: 7/25/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12, Crop type Corn (Silage&Grain) Sudex (Silage) Sorghum Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16_ Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ®Yes ❑No
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
CommenAllketer to question#.): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
3. and 8. Parlor waste and solid manure waste from concrete lot is getting into freshwater ditch at corner of barn lot. Suggest contacting
SWCD/NRCS for suggestions regarding curbing,guttering,etc. -NOD, 30-day response. Was also noted on last year's inspection report
25. T-1779 F-14 is strip cropped with orchardgrass, hay,corn,and sorghum. CAWMP does list this field as strip cropped. Owner has
also cleared some additional land on fields F-12 and F-4. Need to contact Alamance Co. SWCD/NRCS for assistance regarding an
ammendment to the CAWMP.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date: d
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01-25 of Inspection 7/24/2001 • Printed on: 7/25/2001
r
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads, building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
05103101

Division of Water Qualiity
^ ` & Division of.Soil and-Water Conservation
4 Otl!
er y>
i
Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for V1911 X Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Q Time:
Q Not Operational Below Threshold
Permitted)6 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: i Vil'1� ll�. c.�ll��Y�..a, !.Ir. ....Farm— county: .A ran.L':e..r............ .... ...............
n� / 2
Owner Name: .... arV.. n....Wo in............................................................. Phone No: ....��IR!...`...7.�.....�..... .�............ ..
Facility Contact: ..11.�l..1..l. U ..I.." ..n..........Title: ................................................................ Phone No:
TMailing Address: u....... .� ................ f .. n�..�... � ............._...... ..........................
..�. .......... ......................................
Onsite Representative; � Integrator:......................................................................................
m
',, 44, ) J�
Certified Operator:.....t(1. ..j..I...ivV:r...� • ��"' � �, ..... Operator Certification Number:.........a213.o';:Z �•
Location of Farm:
A.
T
❑Swine ❑Poultry xCattle ❑Horse Latitude Longitude ®• ®� ®��
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity PopulationPoultry capacity Population Cate Capacity Po utatian:'
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy Z�
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity Z 0
Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW ooa
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Ares ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps. ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes *o
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes A No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes ❑-No
Waste Collection &Treatment
4 4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? Spillway. ❑Yes I�Io
`,1 §tructure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .lf.)..lam��...�id�� ........................ . .......................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on hack

Facility Number: 01— Q,S I Date of Inspection oZ p
5. Are there any immediate threats to the,Pegrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes )No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? '�]Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes XNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes �rNo
o
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes
12. Croptype p
I3. Do the receiving crops differ wit ose designated in the Certified Animal Wast Management Plan( WMP)? ❑Yes kNo
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes O No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes 0 No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes VNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ANO
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? _ ❑Yes A No
Required Records & Documents �}
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage& General Permit re adily available ❑Yes
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes fNo
o
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard,waste analysis& soil sample reports) El Yeso
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yeso
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ANo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes N0
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ANo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? x'$es ❑No
�'�Jo yiolatignjs:o�d�ticienc a wire notec1 during this:v�sit: Yoix wiil ><eeeiye no;Cu ,
icorres• o Bence:ahi;'f this:visit.
Comments(refer to question#): Explain,any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any-other comaments: g
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
A.
. Y--
Reviewer/Inspector Name f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date: 5/0ol

J(,
Facility Number: Q -- a of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes NNo
roads,building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 4=—] *ee--
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional omments an or ravnngs:
Notre s : aoo I oz. a000 Trees oh darn? `
AppI i Ca 'on wdo � rtka+- � �rQ o n
4 T- F-- I '�
�-- C to L)
�
L,) L) P.
5100

I�
r>�r Division of Water Quality
ivision of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O. Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑=Access
Facility Number
Date ur Visit: 3l7/2001 Time: 13:04 Printed ion: 7/23/2001
01 25
0 Not-Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................
Farm Name: atrYiutll3'iabur.�[�kYtint.�?silty..kaxlnot.................................................. County: Alan ame......................................... !'.5RQ........
OwnerName: lY.iatlyjg................................... Newlia........................................................ Phone No: 3.76: 1..4.8....................................................................
MailingAddress: 53.3.& h9.m.Kd...................................................................................... Ue.b.m..N.C.......................................................... 273.9.Z.............
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative: WAlb.ux..Xcwjjin........................................................................... Integrator:....
..................................................................................
Certified Operator:..Wilb.UX................................... N.ew1ja.............................................. Operator Certification Number.-ZI,3z
.............................
Location of Farm:
114 mile S.of intersection of NC 54 and Thom Rd on Thom Rd. Dairy is on the right.SR 2145 5249 Thom Road. A�
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 ' 58 1 23 64 Longitude 79 • 1G 57
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 120 105
❑Feeder to Finish 10 Non-Layer JE1 Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder 10 Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 120
❑Gilts
[I Boars Total SSLW 168,000
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees 4s�Strearn Impac 5t
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ........
Freeboard(inches): 28
05103101 Continued
i,

Facility Number: 01-25 Date of Inspection 3/7/2001 on: 7/23/2001 f ..
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,0"rinted
re erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
1 L Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Cool season grass(hay,graze Small Grain(Wheat, Barley, Corn (Silage& Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis& soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑ Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): ®Field Copy ®Final Notes
7. Saw a couple of groundhog holes. Continue efforts to get rid of and backfill holes.
9.Just has a max. liquid marker now. After the WSP is pumped down,Mr.Newlin plans on having a graduated marker installed.
r. Newlin was applying waste today to cool season grass.
r. Newlin called DWQ at the WSRO yesterday to inform them that he was within 3 inches of his max. liquid elevation.
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued f

IFaclli y Number: 41-25 to of Inspection I 3/7/2001 Printed on: 7/23/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
O5103101

vision of Water Quality
vision of Soil and Water Conservation
_O Other Agency
Type of Visit O° Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit S Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 8/22J2000 Time: 101S Printed on: 8/22/2000
01 25
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
®Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: M.arxiud.W.ilbuu:.N?twlijn.t?aixx.F.arm.................................................. County: Alaau arm......................................... WSJKQ........
OwnerName: MAr.Y.im................................... Newlin......................................................... Phone No: 33.6::3.7.6::A1.48...........................................................
FacilityContact: �'.E'.tlltur. .�.vylxtt...............................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: U.M. ham.Rd..................................................................................... lY.tfhkwe...N.C.......................................................... 2.7.3.0.2.............
Onsite Representative:Wilbux.N.mliAl....................................7..................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.Wilbur A.,............................. NvAim.............................................. Operator Certification Number:2,1325.............................
Location of Farm:
1/4 mile S.of intersection-of NC 54 and Thom Rd on Thom Rd.Dairy is on the right.SR 2145 5249 Thom Road. +
❑Swine ❑ Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 •r 58 11 23 « Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 120 95
❑Feeder to Finish ' Q Non-Layer n-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 120
❑Gilts V
❑Boars Total SSLW 168,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees& Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`?(If yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ®Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
.Identifier: ......Waste Roo d...... ...................:................ :........................:......... .................................... .................................... .
Freeboard(inches): 38
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: 01-25 Date of Inspection 8/22/2000 Printed on: 8/22/2000 ,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the 919rity of any of the structures observed?(ie/tre0evere erosion, ❑ Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type ' Corn (Silage&Grain) Sorghum Timothy,Orchard,&Rye
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes IN No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems, over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
0:N0 i01006ns;o�deficiencies Wf e'nijted:dui-iitg•this:visi:t::Yutt:will Tecei:v0,-hd•r6r.thee.
: correso orideitce:about this:visit: : : . . .
Comments(refer Ytoquestton �Ezplatn'any YES answers and/or any,recommendations or any other comments.
Usee,drawings of•facility.to,better.ezplain'situattons..(nse additional.pages;as necessary).
7. Need to mow dam within 30 days as some 1-1 1/2 inch diam.trees are becoming established.
8. Recommend adding concrete to barn lot to send parlor water to waste pond.
9. Recommend horizontal markings every foot.
19. Soil samples to be taken this Fall for 2001 season. August applications to pasture were outside of the window. Per Mr.Newlin,he
was told by SWCD to apply anyway to get level down in waste pond after>6 inch rain event.
r. Newlin had excellent records and even had weekly freeboard readings.
Reviewer/Inspector Name +Melissa Rosebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu Z AvjDate: 66 5100

Facility Number: 01-25 1)� ^of Inspection 8/22/2000 Printed on: 8/22/2000
Odor: Issues 0
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes [] No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes Cl No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
r
w
5100

16
• ivision of Water Quality
ivision of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency .
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: cz= Q Time: � Printed Ern: 7/21/2000
Facility Number
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted X
Certified ©Conditionally Certified 0 Registered ' Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
Farm Name: ..... Irv+ .. .+.�. .H-..` ".s !J�� n Ql.r. ...("unt��: .19l-�mane-e. .................:......................
r 1
A&IJIOwner l\ame: .....L�[.1�..�.. . .1r....n ' .r?1.................................................. Phone No: . . .. ..7LLl..'.... .�. . .......................
Facility Contact: ..lN........�..� .r......Ne. L.l' ........Title: ...................... ............ Phone No: ...................................................
.....-....
N)CMailing Address: ...� ���...-...... �.1p!1......r`�"o .:..�.-.....1!�(.e—bane. }.. ..-....a. .......�........................ .......I.................
Onsito Representative: .. . .- 11-- ------ - jj .................................... Integrator:......
Certified Operator:_W.1.1...ba .A.: -Nee. 'P............................. Operator Certification Number:.....2..1...5....R.'s.....
Location of Farm:
µ, 4mi So o n Sea S 41- om . a n `tom fry
5 0 �4-#ne ri o 51e �1 S Sa om 2
❑Swine ❑Poultry Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ��®� Longitude �" ®' �«
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity o-�
❑Gilts
El Boars Total SSLW ZA z d
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps ❑No Liquid Waste 'Management System
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes �No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance ratan-made? ❑Yes ❑No
h. If discharge is observed.did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No
c. II-dischargo is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway ❑Yes No
SVucture/4 Structure 2 Structure; Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 `
Identifier:r' .� r�,,, ................................ ................................... .................................... .............................—.... ...............--...................
ILL✓-Q�1�-.....�-'
Freeboard(inches): )q ��
5100 Continued on hack

Facility Number: Q — Date of Inspection I Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the trity of any of the structures observed'? (ic/tree,,severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes �No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes [ No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload 4YesNo
12. Crop type r-- b fi CUI�13. Do the receiving crops differ with ose designated in e Certified Animal Waste anagement Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes XNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes 0 No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes [XNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage& General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes XN0
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps.etc.) ❑ Yes No
19_ Does record keeping need improvement'?(ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes No
20_ Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes XNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes IkNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ic/discharge, freeboard problems, over application) El Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative'? ❑ Yes XNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes KNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP'? El Yes IXNo
E3;M.06lat>toiis:or deficieI. ncies Were noted-duretig•iiis,visit:-Yoik Will•teeeive nio further:
corTes• oridence:abatit:thisvisit.: : : : :•:•: .:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:-:•:•: :•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:.:-:•:
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
eeA Nks rno\,) a&m u3f 1A 3b dad Ot 5 V t1 d
bee>m in .es,,bl 5 _ M ire ,
_C,0 m 01_6v� -10 5en4
�pO1,t'4o r- lit car � �- n
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date: 5100

• FaHlIty Number: — Q if Inspection] Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues 9
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage,Pond or lagoon fail to discharge Wor below web--9 NO
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 011', j Jwo
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes [XNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes No
roads,building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes XNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or VNo
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? YOM'T` eg"• B e-9 B+I0
Additional Comments an orDrawings: 17
Pre- Tv)-5PeC+ion Noes : A.
Fie/d. III e han,,f j FaSS -z 6rOP5 ?
Perm i� wJ records now
WO-6+ a n oil �{ s i S /► n lid S 7 Cor G��i n i nda05
w e.et- (�
Cb rn -- 1M arch S�l,�
L'ool SeGt'-jo
PGLS+un
rC
b-�'he-&4 — g ---r Aarc.h
dry n Sor hi urn — y r-t � 'To I
� � y
SuMM� Annuo—k budex) --Tune
Pu rr�} eJ�� a •9 rv�on� C �� d s +o �.
IR . Soil Wfe s 'h, be -},V,-,) �,}
ro r aoo 1 Seas ,
lulu5�}- CLfP}% c04°nS 4t pos4-1re, ou+S1de_ cr(- w) ,
h�
M r • ti ,>1 was - td }�,,� u
b
a ''� app
l�vej d o 1
g +� h \.,V s+e._ pond.
Y1 lv)A e,\k U,I 1,e-r4 ne-0045 �-+— W42A
5100

1
w 'vision of Water Quality
islon of Soil and Water Conservation
Q ther Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason far Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑Denied Access
Date of Visit: 4/6l2000 Time.: E== I'rinicd on: 8/17/2000
Facility Number O1 25
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
FarmName: .................................................. County: Maim=......................................... WSRQ........
OwnerName: lYa,aryin................................... Newlia........................................................ Phone No: 376:A1.4.8....................................................................
FacilityContact: .............. ..............................'1'itle: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: U.M.Mho. )1.Rd..................................................................................... !!lebarxC..SIC.......................................................... 2.7.3.02.............
Onsite Representative: )'. jjb.MI:.NeW. jj l........................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Opera tor:l3'Albttr..A............................... NyC.Iwlitx.............................................. Operator Certification Number:,ZI3.25.............................
Location of Farm:
1/4 mile S.of intersection of NC 54 and Thom Rd on Thom Rd.Dairy is on the right.SR 2145 5249 Thom Road. •
❑Swine ❑ Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 • 58 00 G{ Longitude F 0071,
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer IN Dairy 120 111
❑Feeder to Finish JE3 Non-Layer 10 Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity r 120
❑Gilts 1
❑Boars Total SSLW 168,000
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field A77r7e7a771
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & tream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Witter of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes IN No
Waste Collection K Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...... ................. .................................... ................................... ........................I........... .................................... ....................................
.............
Freeboard (inches): 60
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: 01-2S Date of lnspec.ti m 4/6/2000 Printed on: 8/17/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the 41R.'rity of any of the structures observed?(ie/troevere erosion. ❑Yes ® No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do an stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
Y q g g q q
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn(Silage&Grain) Timothy,Orchard,&Rye Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑Yes ® No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ® No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ® No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ®Yes ❑No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems, over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
D;l�o violations;or deficiencies-were noted:during this:visit.-:You-will recei"ve•no•ftirther-
•Corres oridence.abouf this.visit.'.•.•.•.•.•.-. . . . . . . . . . .
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
7 Need to mow around waste storage pond. _A_
13 Need to have field# 12 changed from grass to crops in WUP.
18 Need to get a copy of the certification with WUP and other records.
19 Waste analysis were not within 60 days of application.Application for corn was not within windows of application. Need to start
keeping lagoon levels per General Permit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name .Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00

F,�cility Number: O —25 D nt'Inspection 4/6/2000 Printed can: 8/17/2000
Odor Issues
25. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
r
5100

P $
A .
�: Division of and Water Conservation -Operatian RevW
4,
Division ofand Water Conservation- Compliance In EA
anDivision of Waer Quality-Compliance Inspection} . 3 F .
a ' •`� k
Other Agency -Operation Review I
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number O1 25 Date of Inspection 7-2-99
Time of Inspection 1300 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10clot Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .................................................. County: Alamatm......................................... !'ISRO....._..
OwnerName: Rumba................................... Newlin......................................................... Phone No: 376:6J..4.8....................................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: SgIO g........................_...............
MailingAddress: 5249jhp x.Rd...................................................................................... M-6,41XV..N.C.......................................................... 273.0.2..............
Onsite Representative:1hlbN1.N��t'llAl........................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.W.j b.W_A............................... Xv.m.. la.............................................. Operator Certification Number:7.)L3.25.............................
Location of Farm:
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
11.4.a►rile.S,.nafa>at.�r��tio�..a1..�1C..�4.aaad.:ishapn.�sl.��.�:hauti..tisl�.a?al� ..i�.ar�.IShe..�' t��n.S.ti.21.45..524y.�l�nrrA.l;.aid.............................
a
Latitude 35 • 58 00 Longitude 79 • 17 (!0 '�
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder 10 Layer I 1 19 Dairy 120 100
❑Feeder to Finish JE1 Non-Layer I JE1 Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 120
❑Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW 168,000
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes ❑No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Holding pond
Freeboard(inches) ...............4$................ ................................I... .............................. .................................... .................................... ....................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?(ie/trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
3/23199 Continued on back

Facility Number: 01-25 V)f Inspection 7-2-99
6. Are there structures on-site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a was a management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
1 immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage& Grain) Small Grain(Wheat, Barley, Orchard grass
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ❑No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Ycs ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ®No
Required Records &Documents
IT Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems. over application) ❑ Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ®No
®:.io-yiolations:ordefciencieg•were:noted"during•this:visif--:You:willr iei:ve•no•furth'er-:•:
: coireso orideike:about this.visit. :.:•:•:•:•:.:•:•:•:.
Comments{refer to question#): Explain any YES answers andJor any recommendations or any other comment "
IMF s of facilrt to"better ex lain situations use.additional a es as necessar
t; y, P f _ P g Y)
13 Crop types and rotation need to be clarified in WUP.
Total design capacity needs to be determined, 120 or 100 heads of cow.
Pond marker was installed since the last inspection review on 2-17-99.
Reviewer/Inspector Name lHamid Rafiee Ron Linville
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

l '
i 13 Division it and Water Conservation -Operation R w
i 13 Division lWil and Water Conservation- Compliance ction
E Division of Water Quality-Compliance Inspection
13 Other Agency-Operation Review
149 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number O1 2g Date of Inspection 7-2-99
Time of Inspection 1300 24 hr.(hh:mm)
Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered [3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ........................................... ..... County: Alamarxe-f......................................... MR.Q........
OwnerName: natryin................................... Nem'.1in......................................................... Phone No: 376:4.14.8....................................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: s.,IMF.........................................
MailingAddress: 5Z49..'l:Itom lid...................................................................................... MOA11C.Ac.......................................................... 2.7.30.2..............
Onsite Representative: Wilhar.N.Pw il................ . Integrator:
.......................................................... ......................................................................
Certified Operator:.Wjjbut.&.............................. NerJ111.............................................. Operator Certification Number:.W.25
Location of Farm:
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. ...- ......................
i
>11.4.mike..S.,.nF.inner. eslio�.a>..NG.. .artd.�hann.Kst.��.�ham.ttd,.�?aiz ..is.ont.ch . kxtn.S.1Z.��.45..� 4Q.>kt�rrt.dad............................
......................I.:::::::::............ ............ ....................................::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Latitude 35 ' S8 QO Longitude 79 ' 17 00
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer 10 Dairy 120 100
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 120
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 168,000
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lat aon.1rea ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischaMg� i- Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate'? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Holding pond
Freeboard(inches): ..............0............... ................................... .................................... ....I.............................. ................................... .................. .........
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on buck

Facility Number: 01--25 ate of Inspection 7-2-99
6. Are there structures on-site which arc'�E properly addressed and/or managed throughtte management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage&Grain) Small Grain(Wheat, Barley, Orchard grass
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Required-Records & Document
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage& General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis& soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑ Yes ®No
23. Did ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ®No
®: No•vi)I'AH6tis:or deficiencies•were noted diiditg•th:i9 v,iMt.•:You:rvi11 receive•n6•ftfrther,
: correso oridence'abouf this:visit.
Comments(refer to question#.): Explain any YES answers and- any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
13 Crop types and rotation need to be clarified in WUP.
Total design capacity needs to be determined, 120 or 100 heads of cow.
Pond marker was installed since the last inspection review on 2-17-99.
LMI
ReviewerlInspector Name YHamid Rafiee Ron Linville
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

�Drvrs>oin "�t�l and Water ConservatEonti :.Operatd n,R `�t
1 Division Wil and Water Conservation-Cornpliance� ction
�:Divisiowof Water % -Compliance Inspection
O Other,Agency aO ration Re view
Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number O1 25 Date of Inspection F 7-2-979
Time of Inspection 1300 24 hr.(hh:mm)
0 Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [] Registered 113 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .................................................. County: Manta=......................................... !' -SRO.........
OwnerName: Harvita................................... Nett:list►..._........_............................................ Phone No: 37.4-6 14 ..............................._....................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: Sal,11±e.........................................
MailingAddress: 4�jIx9m.>3d...................................................................................... IYaebauto..N.C................................. ..................... 27.3.0.2..............
Onsite Representative: W.jjbw,.Nc jjx1................ , Integrator:.,,,,,,.,
Certified Operator:.Wjjb.ux..A................................ Lyeyy,bx................. ....... Operator Certification Number:,ZI3.z5...........
...................... ..................
Location of Farm:
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude F-0-0-111 Longitude 79 • 17 00 «
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle CaiDacitv Po ulation
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer I ® Dairy 120 100
❑Feeder to Finish JEI Non-Layer I I 1E]Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 120
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 1(68,000
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagiwn Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [] Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Holding pond
Freeboard(inches): 4.L............. . . ....................... .................................... ............................_...... ................................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 01-25 ite of inspection 7-2-99
6. Are there structures on-site which are`!!6t properly addressed and/or managed througho"ste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Appligalign
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
H. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage&Grain) Small Grain(Wheat, Barley, Orchard grass
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ®No
®;' eeser : ti :N.b- 6lat6ris;oi &'fln ne Y noftirthet•
: u :coF;ri&s ondence:about this:visit.
Commensfer oquestion#). ExainnYyE ners an /o anyecommendations or any other com;m;
ens
drawinsoffacilit obtterIse explainsituation .
(use additional pages as necessary):
13 Crop types and rotation need to be clarified in WUP. i
otal design capacity needs to be determined, 120 or 100 heads of cow.
Pond marker was installed since the last inspection review on 2-17-99.
E
er/Inspector Name Hamid Rafiee Ron Linville
er/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

D Division it and Water Conservation Operation-It
0 Division it and Water Conservation`-Compliance action
Division of Water.Quality -Compliance Inspection .
Other Agency-Operation Review
19 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 2s
Date of Inspection -4`2
Time of inspection FT 3oa 24 hr.(hh:mm)
[] Permitted d Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated.
Farm Name: ......L.!..1.1�Y V1f1... .t.L.�.Ur....��: .I.r1....L.l-- ! f-Gr} l County. .....1 �GI.1�l > .C< ,................. .......................
Owner Name: ..........A..l.ac..Vin.........lV. t, f tn....... ]' Phone No: .......3. ..�Q..-...> .} ...".6 J..7..(2..................
Facilitv Contact: ..............................................................................Title: ............. ...... Phone No:
NlailingAddress: . . ....... .................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
rr II , r Operator Certification Number: Z( Z�
Certified Operator:.............f,. 1.�..1..�! .... 111..�'W t n ................... ......................................
......... ..........................
Location of Farm:
....................................___..............................................................................__..........................................__________...._..............._.............................
____________________________ T
Latitude 3®a®� pU Longitude OD t►5a -
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder 10 Layer I 1 (0 Dairy too Q 6
❑Feeder to Finish JE1 Non-Layer I Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder - ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 10 C)
❑Gilts
❑Boars - Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
E
olding Ponds/Solid Traps ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &Stream IrnuaCtS
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
g y Q ❑Yes ❑No
d. Docs di,char c bypass�p,ass a lagoon system'?(If}cs, nirtil'}� DW )
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: pond
Freeboard(inches): ..........�.5................ ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes X No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

I
Facility Number: 1 — Z S . to of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenarice/improvement? ❑ Yes p j No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Applirktion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. 'Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type e6 f cs"h 4 11
, r I0,-C k4,d g rCc.I S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑No
14.- a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 14 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Re aired Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes W No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists, design, maps,etc.) ❑ Yes PQ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard, waste analysis &soil sample reports) ❑Yes M No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑ Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes IR No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes No
®:Nd-06 attoris:or&rJaendes were itofed-dirt i ii fhis'visit:-YO will tebO*4e Rio furither
corres oncience.abilut this visit. .
Comments(refer to.question#): :Explain a6 YES_ansvwers an or-.any,recontmendat�ons or`:any other comments: k.,`- a
UseArawings of facility to`better explain situations: use,additional pages as necessary) _
o
I3 Cr P --�ypeg ne- s '�� (�� CAL.a,/=rr & `
r
' I
p AGE y� �5
f J / �` d, ) 26
6 ndl /h.���tr L,Jc�S [n57`�-L�•CU 5In GAG �e // ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name 7iZ7— T
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r Date: 4--2-
3/23/99

'L
Facility Number: — 'Z �le of Inspection � •
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
29. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, []Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 4gNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:'
1
T
3/23/99

Division of SEri ?Water oiiScrvatiort Opeititivii$evtew
k DtvisidLtof Sa�I and WaterCoriserattonGamplLance lspeWn Y s loll
� 410
y d3 ✓ a• a A s �t., ag ,---",, n.e ,fig .�` ��t� -s`' ,.
�:DI4 LS10Il� �Slier pL1ILty Y.<`�Qmp4llatLCe Inspec tLn N eration KevLewv w..� ' :::
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of W 1 ins €Ttion O Follow-up of DSWC: revie", O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 ltr.(hh:mm)
©Registered 0 Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted ❑ Not O erational Date LasLOperated:
Farm Name: County: l '. •.......... ../U. ': _` E.' IVE 0
Owner Name: !`a`_ Qept c# �MNR
.................................................. ........................................................................ Phone No: .......................................................................................
NOV - 3 00
FacilityContact ...... Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ......--'--........................................
MailingAddress: ........................................... \............................................. ...................................................x-.---......:... ..... �.
t1v i.!t t.�t t t.i LJ t I t 4 v
Onsite Representative:.....4:1L� �- ......................... Integrator•......................................................................................
` I Z �
Certified Operatorz.................................................. ............................................................. Operator Certification Number...�_..E.......... ..
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
Design Current - Design _ Curren# - :Design .y Current
.. Swine Capacity Population Poultry' Capacity Population -Cathe= Capacity-Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy
p ❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer I I ❑ Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
ElFarrow to Finish Total Destgn.Capacity".
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total AW-,
Nunibir of,Lagoons/Holding Ponds' ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray H ld Area
n. R ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
}.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes �No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes �No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑Yes P(No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes Clio
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes No
i
7/25/97 Continued on back

aw
Facility Number: —2
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes No
Structures (Lagoons,floldina fonds,Flush Pits,etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Yes 11
/0
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ......f....... ......<........ ...................I................
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes ONo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes ZNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes ---'No
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
..u.�..� ........1 c.��. .............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes [PTO
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes �No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ONo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes WNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ErNo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ZNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement? / Yes ❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Oniv
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes XNo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ONo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes ❑�No
0 No.violationsor deficiencies.were noted.during this,visit.-Yon.wili receive-no'-ftiriher'.-
correspondence A oiit-this:visit..:.
2v.iY'SA" F- �.l•"" A '� �t5£`Yd�c'� 'G<--- y "C,c.�fi:k. 5"3�;'^ 3Uk �^ ,gt'�,..^-.' YY�..as��+^�au '� -f� -:
�mments�(refer„�to questinn#)Explain auty�YES answers.andlorxagy3re�mrnendatrorts=for anp�o#her crsmrnents a
'�3iID-�
Useih�trvthgs of fac�hty tc,bstterexplatn srtttatiansuse addihonal pages as�tecessary}• k - �;
.,.--��x3` i.�e.�";�.,}.,..�.
VO
7/25/97
P
5^
: e
Reviewer/Inspector Name ..
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: t

t ,❑Division of and Water Conservation ❑Otheency '
❑ iv
tsion of Water Quality ffil
outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection / C3 24 hr.(hh:mm)
©Registered EWertified /©Applied for Permit ©Permitted E3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: .. . ...
Farm Name: f !,Rf/�i✓..1.�''J.f�I1.'S7..�K�fr% .:,t�1ka �... �lQ.!ax County: .......... l..r-G .6�......... .......................
r r
Owner Name......... t .l�' % ......./.Ue.w.1w. ...................... Phone No: 332'4......
3... �az��........................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: .................
Mailing Address: ....... ............................................. .. .�, llr^'e.....yL.....................................qz..2. 0.
Onsite Representative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:...........................
Certified Operator;........ !..Z4,C1. ............ . w.,li... ...............I......... Operator Certification Numher.dl..`.. Z ._.....
Location of Farm:
r�z,'.5..... ... r-.22:v......4�.r f ..,�::4 ."....................5:�.�.9.... ....Q�,,....it ....
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude
Design CurrenE rDesign Current Design Curreuf
Swine , __ Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Pnpulatton? Cattle Capacity 1>l'plrulatron
❑Wean to Feeder =❑Layer ❑Dairy G p
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer []Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑m Other
❑Farrow to Finish " Total Design Capacity no
❑Gilts
Boars
Tota1.SS..
Number of',Lagoons 1 Holdrng Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area❑No Liquid Waste Management System
General �,,�
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes E? o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes (I-RU'
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) El Yes �❑Now
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes Lrf Now�
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ElYes Epf
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑Yes U-Ko
maintenance/improvement?
b. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes L' l o�
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes Me
7/25/97

I VAIlity Number:0 i —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes M-110
Structures(Lagoons,Ilolding Ponds,Flush Pits,etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Yes U.. z-t
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
n
Identifier: ..I.r7N..s ............................ .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard (ft): .........fa...................... ................ ..
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes O_N�
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes EL&Lr
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes 0-Pxe---
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes QPd�
Waste Application
14, Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop r 45 --- ae....CIF.Rye..c�1,1.......................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes eoo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes U.Pis'"
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes [�
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®-A a--
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes gkue-­�
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes QND-�
22, Does record keeping need improvement? kl.L*6 ❑No
For Certifsed or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes o�
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®'No
25. Wer y additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes ISO
_ o violkions-or. deficiencies.were-no'ted-during this;visit.-You;wi11 reeei've-rzo-ftirtlier
cofrOOhdebc0 Ab:oiit this:visit.l.
Co nests(refer to questron#) <Explatn any YES answers and/oQ4ny recflmmendat ons or any other eom gents ��
)se drtwtngs of facrlrty tter to be explatn situahotts (use addEtsonal pages as necessary.)
..:ter s r "s •r ,s ^�,R; :'"_ ;. e. .. EW ',.--°s
7/25/97
E
wer/Inspector Name wer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z

..
;, ❑Division of S nd Water Conservation ❑Other A +y
w� kF ;
µ [division of Water Quality
JOIZ(Altine. Q Complaint '-0 Follow-up of DW(2 ins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 1 Tirne of Inspection 24 hr.(hh:mm)
Registered -©Certified [3 Applied for Permit Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farni Nan3e: ......- County ............. ...... ...........
Ors'rter Name:.......II)MIF.Pi f1......el ?u Clt........................................I......... Phone No:......��t`a...........�a..�..`t��..................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:...............................................I................ Phone No: ...................................................
f
141aiGiig Address: ......-$..rr�.. ....... ....... .................... ..........................?40 Z
.& "- !..�
OnsiteRepresentative:................................................................:...........I.............................. Integrator...............................................................-...----................
Certified Operator:.................................................. .................:........................................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................................
Location of Farm: =
...............................................................................................................................................................................•...........................................................................................
.-......
Latitude Longitude • I�.l t'
.' a �.F t wDest ii. CEIr")rent � "' Deli n Current a s
_ x;� t�E :Design Current��
Swine
Capacity xPopulatronPaultry Capacity Populaton��Cattle ,CapacrtyPopulatrori
. ,
❑Wean to Feeder x,❑Layer ❑Dairy Zy
Lzy,::
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non Layer N.'❑Non Dairy
[I Farrow to Weans
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other ,s t
u
Farrow to Finish Kjk
pTtit IFDesign Capac ty
z
❑GiltsF,l� r
in
A ❑Boars fi ,u Total SSIW
u -
Number of Lagoons!Holding oP nds��3 ❑Subsurface Drains Present J10 Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
❑No Liyu-
�d Waste iVlatiagenient System
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑Yes . o
2- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes D40
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface:Water?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated fort'in pumin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes i,o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? El Yes 0fro
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds)regoire ❑Yes i\To
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? Dlf4o
7/25/97
Canrinued on back

-- Facility Number: C a
'8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑Yes [moo
Structures (Lagoonsfflolding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? Cl Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Tdcntifecr: IDIe��iyq.�
............. . .. ............................_...._
Freeboard(ftj: ......3.. .... ......................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes ❑-N'T
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes Q•N-5-
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑N15
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? es ❑No
Waste At)plication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes L-KO
(If in excess of�WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....... ...............................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes [}'do
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ED'1 �
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ©-Mu
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes 2,i1 o�
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El Yes EJ,5'
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes es-ITO
22, Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes ,I✓1"No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes ❑No
No.Ao'1 ' iortsoir de i'de_ncie's.wiere nated;d iririg this:visit.;.Y.ou.'W l rece' i:ve.no:further_.'
•:•correspondence: ab:oufthis'visit:-:•;-; ; ;-:-:-: :•:• . : ', ;' . ;•.•.•: :•: ; : :-'`.•;-;•',-;-; :-; ;•.•
GornmentsF iefeir`'to uestion# °Ez lain an{AYES ansrves and/or are omniendalronsor an F tither connsnesfs ' .; z
Use drawings of�facrhtY to betier,�explatn srtuahons 3�use additional-pages as.necessary) � �- �� � > _ _� '
:�':se' -':: .?{` -': ,z..,,, °' �., <•,�.'�"�` x>.m.l <.;Y''b.,.,:. .,�+, „ ,','' rn "�:`# a :s�i,+g. 'a..<r'�z� r"s'�.�'°� � .�: ,.z
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Nance ^, -, �` 4 '
�. ,fne' a�s< ,,,: r t �r. b,s..- a..C. 'r ••z%,..
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ` Date: d

h
' se �
�. �
❑ Division of Sat and Water Conservation ❑Other rncy
M
U9,Division of Water Quality s
tontine 70 Cunt faint O Follow-up of MVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection Iv
Facility Number C9 j Time of Inspection L_/�Z 24 hr.(hh:mm)
Jp Registered O Certified ❑Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 0\ol O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: .................. ...... .......... County: ....1.41 ............. .......................
Owner Name: �/�'WC' Phone\b: ...................
Facility Contact. ............................................ ....Tale Phone No
Mailing Address: .........rs��..1....L........ .,Ctr~•�........?
S /!?.e..,da .. ............... a Z
OnsiteRepresentative:.......................................................................................................... Integrator:................... ...........I............................. ..........................
Certified Operator................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number..........................................
Location of Farm:
.................................................................................•-_--_-......................................................................................................
..................-........................... w
Latitude GC Longitude �° FTT'11 ©L4
Design Current-� Design` orient -Design F`` urrent'
�.
Swine ' Capacity Population. Poultry Capacity ,Population Cattle, Capacity,°,Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer I I ❑ Dairy 1 2—
Feeder to Finish ILI Non-Layer ❑ Non-Dairy
F
❑ Farrow to Wean F
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other3.
❑Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity,
❑Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW..
Number of Lagoons/Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
r :
" ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
_ General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes B•tvo
2. Is any discharge observed frorn any part of the operation? ❑Yes 040
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,dial it reach Surface Water`.'(If yes.notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/nun?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑,�No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ElYes L�Yt�'o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes B No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ElIQ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design`? �❑Yes To
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? L <Y , Iwo
7/25/97 Continued on back

Fact 'ty Number: O (— a,
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes G-K-6
Structures (LaQoons.tlolding Ponds, Flush Pits,eta
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Yes
QVw—
StrUCtUre 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .............. -y7.., Q. . ..................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...
Freeboard(ft): ......3...... ............... -. ...............I....................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes S- NS
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes �o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes UNIT-
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? es ❑No
Waste Application � �
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes 9<0
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
r
15. Crop type ......
�. � .......................................................................................................................... .............
....... .. .... ...... ,16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes O-KO,
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes QN;e-
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ❑ado
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes �-No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes Q-1 o
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes O-N-o-_
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ,E
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes ❑No
No'violations-or deficiencies were noted dufln'g this:visit. :You.will receive no-fdrttier`
correspondepce ab"out this:visit:-' : : . : - . . . . . . . . : . . -.• •.•. : � .
Comments(i efer to1,question#j Expl4in4 YES answers and/or�ai y cecommendattons cfi�any other cainments', � � F
.U!Wd. awtt gs of factltt��tc►better explatri sttuattons {use addtttonsl pages as necessary) t r
------------------
Avezl;;� �
7I25I97
Reviewer/Inspector Nanic
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Q

ZS�z�'`4z
M
Date of Inspection Time of Inspection
M 7 1 —fr-T.79--7'Use 24 hr. time: 15/8/96 U
Farm Status: Registered in Routine a Complaint a Follow-up
Farm Name: Mar.v.in[,W.ilLiur..LILP-wlin.D.airy.,Farin................................................ County: Alawaacc............................................ WSRO.........
Owner Name: Mar.yin....................................Newlin...................................................... Phone No: 376::614S....................................................................
Mailing Address: 5249 Thom Rd Mebane NC 27302
Onsiterepresentative: .......................................................................................................... Integrator: .......................................................................................
Certified Operator Name: W. .ilbur.A............................................ NP-WHEL.................................................
Location of Farm:
......................... ............
.............................
............................. ............................
........................................................".......I........................................................................................................................ ..........
...................................................................................... ....................
..............................
.............................. .............................................................. ............................................. ....................................................................................
Latitude 7=1 0 Longitude
inNot Operational Date Last Operated: .........................................................................................................................................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
I W. Kllffi=�. WWI E!,I.................. N,tc. ...
.UU
M"MUM: ..........
M_.�k Ma V. 0
M
iti
4 ...............
MOZE 0* K�M' M� .'19
0
M . ............. ......
....................................... .............................
V
............ W
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? [3 Yes CI No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [3 Yes H No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [j No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [] No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) Ij Yes [3 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes [3 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds)require Yes [j No
maintenance/improvement?

6. Is facility not in compliance with any Ocable setback criteria? • ❑ Yes ®No
41 t 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge(if inspection after 1/l/97)? ❑ Yes ❑No
f! 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ❑No
Structures goons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑Yes ®No
Freeboard(tt): Lagoon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes N No
e
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ®No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type esczt
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? ❑ Yes p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes H No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement? ❑ Yes H No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
For Certified Facilities Only
20, Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23-Does-facility-require-a-follow=up-visit-bysame-agency? ❑-Yes—❑No
24. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? [] Yes. []No
- ---- ------- - --- ----- - --------------- - ------
-- -- -_----- -- -- � }--------- 'go- =-- _.................................
_ ______ ___
-- -
--_ ---------- ---- _ ..................................
........................................................................................................................................
No records kept to date. Lagoon should,be pumped to almost empty by fall planting.
Reviewerlinspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State-of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources A
Division of Water Quality i;j
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary E H N
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
RECF1v!17D
November 6, 1997 N.C. D e P:. �_� .H N R
Wilbur A. Newlin NOV 1 0 1997
5338 Thom Road
Mebane NC 27302 Winston-Salem
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation Regional Office
Dear Mr. Newlin :
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission
on Agricultural Waste, was ratified by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996.
This bill required that a properly certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste
management system.
The deadline for designating an Operator in Charge for animal waste management systems
involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry was January 1, 1997. Because a training and
certification program was not yet available for these systems, you were allowed to apply for and
were issued a temporary animal waste management certificate from the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). Because you applied for and were
issued a temporary certificate, you were allowed to be designated as the Operator in Charge of an
animal waste management system.
Your temporary certificate expires December 31, 1997, and is not renewable. Our records indicate
that you have not obtained a permanent animal waste management system operator certification. If
you-intend-to-remain-the-Operator-in-Charge-of the-facility-for which-you Were designated,you must
obtain a permanent animal waste management system operator certification of the appropriate type
before your temporary certification expires on December 31, 1997. To obtain a permanent
certification, you must be 18 years of age, complete ten hours of approved training, and pass an
examination. If you do not intend to remain the Operator in Charge, a properly certified animal
waste management system operator must be designated as Operator in Charge of the facility prior to
the expiration of your temporary certification.
This year's final training program for both Type A and Type B animal waste management systems
is scheduled for December 10 and 11, 1997, at the Hunt Horse Complex in Raleigh. If you would
like information about this training program, please contact your local cooperative extension agent
or call Dee Ann Cooper at 919/515-6968. For those enrolled in this training and registering with
Ms. Cooper prior to December 1, an exam will be offered at the Hunt Horse Complex on December
11, beginning at 1:00 pm.
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone[phone] FAX[phone]a
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

In addition to the training and testing at the Hunt Horse Complex, examinations for permanent
certification will be offered on December 11, 1997, in Williamston, Kenansville, Raleigh
(Wake Tech), Wentworth, Salisbury and Morganton. This examination date will be the last
opportunity to obtain permanent certification before your temporary certification expires. If you
need additional information or have questions concerning the examinations for certification, please
call Beth Buffington at 919/733-0026. For additional information about other training
opportunities, please contact your local cooperative extension agent or call David Crouse at
919/515-7302.
Sincerely,
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cc: Regional Office
Water Quality Files
sharedfolder/bedVanimalwaste/tempcertfollowup

Facility Number:0 . 0
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date:l_ 9" G
Time:
General Information:
Farm Name: County: G
Owner Name: Phone No:
On Site Representative:_ 7x�=3& - _Integrator:
Mailing Address:_ Sr Z 77 c,,, 7e - -
Physical Address/Location:
Latitude: 2T�I S3'� 10 o "'Longitude:
Operation. Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Typyvf Carrie No, qf Animals
❑Sow ❑Layer au-y G
❑ Nursery ❑Non-Layer U Beer-
El Feeder
OrherType of Livesrocl- Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: (include in the Drawings and Observations the fineboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot+25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes ❑ No Cal/
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ No ❑/
Is erosion observed?: Yes U No CY
Is any discharge observed? Yes ❑ No U---'
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes E7 No W/
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes U No
(MT the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Acreage: C) G
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application? Yes ❑ No g_—
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application? -Yes ❑ No C]
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No Uk-�
Is z i.rnal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Strewn? Yes El No
A_fir- January 17,1996

Maintenance
• 0
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes C7—No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No &—
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes ❑ No ❑
Explain any Yes answers: C a�
.-2
r Signature: ram-- Date: .21
Z2,L
cc. Facility Asses�nt Unit Use Arrachme=if Needed
prawings or Observations:
AOI-- January 17,1996

'
JUL-14-1995 15:34 FROM DES TER QUALITY SECTION TO WSRO P.02/b?-
Site Requires Imate Attention:
Facility No. Ci- Z
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: - ;2 , 1995
Time: 2 c
Farm Namc10wner•. _,L1� �
Mailing Address: , S 5'S , �,.. ,�� / i r ,a 7. i-a —
County: 14 Za,,- -.e-
Intevatw. Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical AddresslLocation:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle i7t �
Design Capacity: rc U Number of Animals on Site: „f
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:_, ,�' sue' " Longitude: 9 / 7 C. '�J_ " Elevation:_-_-.Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot+25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot+7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: ___-_FL __L_Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adcqua . Y s)ar No
Crop(s) being utilized: _ 'Z_w
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USES Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name tare
cc:Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

JUL-14-1995 15'34 FROM DEM wATER QUALITY SECTION TD
kt5Ra
Site Requires Iftmatc Attention:
Facility Now r _z
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
S M ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS STTE VISITATION RECORD
N y DATE: , 1995
Farm Name/Owner. AZ44uJ�
Mailing Address:_ __5__.2 `t � �G� �' �_ - „ :2 23 z
County: lc ..-c-&
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: e"�Ey%� �_l ;� [�p�-/%�— Phon�-,P/
Physical Addmssa ocation:
Type of Oparation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: ,/_0 e75)� _ Number of Animals on Site: 9
DEM Cerdfication Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: �-5 _,G Longitude: ',-'Z _ 47 °° Elevation:--_---Feet
Circle Yes No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot+25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot+7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: _„aYt. Inches
Was any seepage obscxved from the lagoon(s)? Yes No as any erosion observed? Yes or 1T0J
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch,flushing system,or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No if Yes,Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,land applied,
spray irrigated on speciflo acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
'onal Comments:
/fir_
CAA
I
Spector 1 i1]n'C
cc:Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

OPERRT IONS BRR ICH - bJQ Fax:[phone] Ju 1 >!1 1i):19 P. 1 A,/18
1
S.ila lnlmcdiatc A[tcrltiorr
r
-
Facll$y Numbers
SITE VISITA LION i aRn
SATE: 1995
OWnCr; 1 Fam Nal:=
County:
Agant Visiting Sites •1! C� �/. r.�?i y � PhonL• � 2-12 ia� 77
on S1tt lZeprcs;en[acivn: phono:3 76.: 6
Illyslcal Adclxeas: •_-� Z �l fJo�r�_Ra
_r v
TYPc of Opc;mdva: Swinc _ PauItry Cattic ✓ +
EvS� 1.FiI)�17d8". o ,��' •off i�angiludC�.�_.!_� - ��i �...� n
Type,of Im;pa;tici: (lmund of_ Atrial L
Circlo Ycs 4r No
DOGS tie Aidnml Wal-.:n l.zgocr, I:ave sufficient fmcboart3 of I Foot+LS ye=24 hoar stone avant
(appr_umcaciy l Foct ;-7 1 ,-&;) Yes a � Actual Inch&%
For facilities with rnoro cbm ond 3agc m,plcwc address CbG the
r�
Was pny secp'$c observed ;;,m I _laycon(s,? Yea ar'l ors U;c casiQr)Lf Olz ic:n? Yon OKI Q
{{ __/I �
1s eclr unrc ;a for land araplic; n?,'Y 10 1, the cnYCr crop adtouatt?;, ci'No
Addit�ott f cQ,I;crenLs:
.'���r.f✓ .. %�,^�'����rc-�� Z-.S`Y/` Stir iy / � .�
~r /�i r_s _....���c.....-r-z�r`.�.-._._......_.,!� Gr. �Zx..���S Ya..g� �o�vc•/,
Fa-,,to [phone] of Ag4dtt