010012_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010012 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC010012 ❑ Denied Access
lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 11/21/2017 Entry Time: 10:15 am Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident#
Farm Name: Lindley Dairy Inc.Farm Owner Email:
Owner: W Joe Lindley Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3159 E Greensboro Chapel Hill Rd Snow Camp NC 273499175
Physical Address: 3159 E Greensboro Chapel Hill Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator.
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'53'59" Longitude: 79°19'50"
NC87 south of Graham 13 miles to E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road and turn right. 1 112 miles on left. 1st house past Spring
Church.
Question Areas:
Dischrge&Stream Impacts Waste Col,Stor,&Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: David A Lindley Operator Certification Number: 21322
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name David Lindley Phone:
On-site representative David Lindley Phone
Primary Inspector: Mel' Rose rock Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
7. Please try to control growth of briars on dam of waste pond.
Records look great!
Mr. Lindley met with staff from Alamance County SWCDlNRCS and devised and constructed a retention hole(6'x 3'?)to exclude
silage Ieachate from stream.Leachate is pumped from hole 3-4 times per year and put into the waste pond using a small
portable pump.Seems to be working well.Stream is dear with no odor,foam,or sludge worms observed.Thanks for your efforts!!
page: 1

Permit: AWC010012 Owner-Facility: W Joe Lindley Facility Number: 010012
Inspection Date: 11/21/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 31.20 72.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC010012 Owner-Facility: W Joe Lindley Facility Number: 010012
Inspection Date: 11/21/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine,
Discharges&Stream Impacts Yea No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ N ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
c.What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ ® ❑ ❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection,Storage&Treatment Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed(Led large ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a El El ❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? M ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable ❑ ❑ ❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu,Zn,etc)? ❑
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC010012 Owner-Facility : W Jae Lindley Facility Number: 010012
Inspection Date: 11/21/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Aoolication Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1 Com(Grain)
Crop Type 2 Com(Silage)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain(Wheat,Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑
II& Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ E ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Soil analysis? ❑
Waste Transfers? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Stocking? ❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC010012 Owner-Facility: W Joe Lindley Facility Number. 010012
Inspection Date: 11/21/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No Na No
Crop yields? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ E ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
appropriate box(es)below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ N ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Other Issues Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
(i.e., discharge,freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ E ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ E ❑ ❑
page: 5

w = Division of Water Resouree
Facility Number �� - 0 Division of Soil and Water Siervation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: K Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O.Routine '0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: q Arrival Time: p Departure Time: County: A-(pga Region: W19Z
Farm;came: L1l�3Q`tV ()h*\4 TM(,. Owner Email:
Owner Name: (_i1JoLEj Phone:
Mailing Address: 31' )Ok &k6w58d4D — Gl-IA. k— Hfu— PQ , SNow cep N G P-73 4 9
Physical Address: r
Facility Contact: �C n}/o w1b Lu3 Q LT'y Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: i Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: H?s eq lal 3l 119.,
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers 1r3eef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other I L10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: kybL-10 90-1 fdt_ 60W:j
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes QCj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) 1K Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? �rQ
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes,notify DWR) Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 1�4 Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NF
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 01 - E � Date of Inspection: �
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? 0 Yes M'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [] NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: L"i
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): _
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes C< No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N6No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 15?(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes jZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ft;KYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
'Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �]C k��1j CON 601� 11j V_�w Nt& 014Uf L
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [] Yes gNo JN NA ❑ NE
acres determination'?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
I S. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes NfNo NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes K7rNo ❑ NA 0 NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement`? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Kyes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
r, rd ❑Soil Analysis
n a EjXZ4Q Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No X NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

IFacility Number: ok jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste applt ation equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No � NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes DKfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes NfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
WWI' t� CA-Ukiap�'-�ou 7 �G � ��� TV SEE tF SCE Srru.
gdwj � r�t(o �� 1�wAtrySlS'� 13s�5 � K� �`Sa�fswey-- p_Eccxlz PS
LQS�
FR&S�k W kTr,R P kK Air t_0 uw K WT C L GA k*o bU-1
tuvkku 7 `r (mow &VOw%s
)AC)LpgjW . P 60 �;j� GA- T Lf, N 6GV- `IA&LD w S 4 0% I DO-C­ o ui,
TV- P-L<.0 )j C,60 5 �p��� Ct� q CG �l` k S 15 C0011 Zi 8 U'_1 '�
-N(T
F' cR_&6 i\ , Akae- ' 6MVE / `- C'7 i/j d ULD A`(S G
Ho'p
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: j�
Reviewer/]nspector Signature: A�=� Date: 16
Page 3 of 3 21412015

Division of Water Resource n 3,�/ j 0 F
cc
Facility Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation �/
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: '( 'Moutine ()Complaint 0 Follow-up ()Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: .26/5' Arrival Time: Departure Time:® County: Al Lt,l f1Ce Region: L� (ZQ
Farm Name: L I Y1 Q P i I r 11 T w C. Owner Email:
Owner Name: W, �p { yN A Phone:
Mailing Address: orn — V [ Ca1
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: , d U n d ��2.i{ Title: Ph n� 3 — 5 a IS-
Onsite Representative: Integrator: 3.76- g36
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
14 w2a• 4- , �c�.r rn � Ya MI 1e.5 a n L
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er I Dairy Cow S
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(if yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters WYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes D'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: W �2 p �
7 Spillway?:
iDes�gned Freeboard(in): �r
Observed Freeboard(in): lQ i
3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E)I'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? WYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures tack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Dk< ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Nlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
o
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes *o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [-] Yes [ ) No % NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? [:] Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑W UP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. oes record keeping neediprovement? �}es,�ltiesl — Oyes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ste Applicaf n Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis L1 ..a `�v- sfcf'S ❑Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections [Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes >No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on imgation equipment? ❑ Yes [:] No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 7
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No �]A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below. '�i
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes O�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes fj'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes DNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes P(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. [] Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? 2fYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other copwents.
Us rawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). V'-� UA' 0%—`
ao13 o be-a le
at) q C It Ora ► c,vx Ce nn.ple
NT
-- -L- /VO
e � U
3Aku 5 T �
a px't� v tb hAA.�'O_"
�
M u 5rR- t.& - c ws P a
kA-)-WC —AU�p O_M_�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: re Phone: 1�CJ ! L
D Iafe 7�7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: r
Page 3 of 3_K_j/ - ,n 3 t l n A 21412014

► Division of Water Qualit
Facility Number - _ O Division of Soil and Wate nservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compl' ce Inspection Operation Review p Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine0 Complaint O Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: r Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: &V • <Tcp E �n d/Q Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1J V-e �t h�- k k/ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ! L( ,1 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer DairyCow ZL
Wean to Feeder Non-La er Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Po . Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other I LlOther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes eNo A ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance than-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes rNo
NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Ntfinber: jDateof Inspection:
Waste Collection& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes VO
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes WNo NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental neat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;>No
i NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No -NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): E$Uvc q Sa r t}! J
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes, check ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No / NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfer ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
�J ti'� 1, ✓1 C o nrt�L 1 g n C - w T ��_ �VZCh cyl-p-d r-� �l�tJ Oft,S
-- �l-c� ►✓Q-Z✓ GAG �� � -l. s
')'a OIL
Q,GJ
l4-Ale
C Cat w�.� G✓ S"�Q !4.''q ( S s
5
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
ReviewerAnspector Signature: � u���� (p Gt/�f Date: � f
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number ® - Division of Soil and Wate C fervation n ��
0 Other Agency lT
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 12& fib) Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: / Region: W5 RIJ
Farm Name: L I Y� C elf tr is �n L" Owner Email:
Owner Name: \} 1-0e. LI yva l Phone:
Mailing Address: f�� rye hsbo ro -(,ho�pe l M 11 , �1�nj e� C�gyp/ a 3 y 9
Physical Address: cell 2 3— 5-7 -15—
Facility Contact: �c �(,1 L14'Y � Title: Phone: 3 — gL3,C7
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 14A
ti
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35 S3 S q Longitude: -7q 9 Q
S• +0 E45 t- 6,5 4 - C Ed, -j- C,� 1 •S fh l IRS
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow s130
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other I 10ther
'J
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:] Yes ONo ❑ NA-' ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: J
Xr;
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facilit Number: 61 - Z Date of inspection:
Waste Collection& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes (�TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 11Vc�S�e Qp _
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): .F
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 0 Yes 'gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion, seepage, etc.) �/
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes f�(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? 7�
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes CR"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) �(No
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s):
0. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes DRfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No % NA ❑ NE
acres determination? .
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes %No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes J)d' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [—]Design [:] Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
2 . Does record keeping need i provement? pprop ate-be el ❑ Yes No ❑ A ❑ NE
aste ApWStocking
ion [ eekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis sfzrs [Weather Code
YRainfall Crop Yield [ 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections I—I"' '- &"'
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:] Yes �<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23, If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No [�fNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - .0
Date of Inspection: .3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [:] Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes C�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes >a"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes C9fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes . Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require afollow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
a a a i 3 S a l S 0MAP t e 5 llle f
aot � Cad braon ebty le
0
Reviewer/Inspector Name: j' Phone: �]� 1_J a a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1 Date: a/a61a0 1_ _
Page 3 of 3 2/4/20II

I%
Division of Water Quality. 71
Facility Number - Division of SoWand Watery"C rvation
0-'Other A;geticy
M
isit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
r Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:L-e2q 7� Departure Time:® County:A t0_ VtaAPo Region: WIS AQ
Farm Name: J acL l��al r y4 I::n G Owner Email:
Owner Name: _�� -foe— btid jtO,V Phone: 374 — _3 Z?V
Mailing Address: 3 I S I (p rezn..5 bo ro /4// Rol + Snarw dMW 73
Physical Address:
p
Facility Contact: D" Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
7 Fasf Cd _ C Fo,, t 1',5 1- 5- At le-
o h !` i
Design Current Design Current Design Current.
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer DairyCow 0
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design .Current. Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity 'Pop. Non-Dairy_
Farrow to Finish I JLayers I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-La ye Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts De
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I �d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: 777"`���
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes O�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - • Date of Inspection: O
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �R`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: WOL:5 4'e- QOfl _
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): ��l!
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes U�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environments threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? �2(/No
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): v
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes XNo
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No [�(NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes %,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. oes record keeping need ' rovement? pie ❑ Yes No gA ❑ NE
W ste Applica ' n eekly Freeboar Waste Analysis Soil Analysis Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail" To install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No [(NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? El Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No �rNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes { No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes /�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. �7_�/
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 1 5d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application) 777"`""""'
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes t</No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes51N/o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use,#r5'vVipgs of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ��i� Phone:
kji Reviewer/Inspector Signature: PA e: 7 I S !
Page 3 of 3 21412011

ice' �` -� - ,: v��sonofl�,;aterQual�t�v ra;
� Usid'Wof Soil and V!'aterlC,00nserrvatior :rt
,Fa�tl�ty Number f Z �,
Q�p therAgeocy
Type of Visit Xcompliance Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit .Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: f!Z s Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: f l a lwAA6E Region:LJS
Farm Name: _ L_,,,1j1pj4_ DR14rti Owner Email:
Owner Name: ��e Phone: 33� -3 - -3 77
Mailing Address: 3 f S ! �rz2�l.S�drd - 1 'r . �/ic�w Ca•�� . 1 z7 3�
Physical Address: AKC
Facility Contact: °�+t r ��r��` t h Title: Phone No: 776
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: o © Longitude: ° ® E
}4w� 8'I S. was Goo- Cl, {I��/ fZd, ��-► �} 1,5
oA
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle _ Capacity Poulatian,.
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer aDairy Cow 2Z5' ZD
❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Non-Layer I Lj Dairy Calf
a..
El Feeder to Finish ❑ Dai Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean k Dry.Poultry `❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Gilts ❑Non-Layers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars ;❑ pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Turkey Poults
E. U.
❑ Other ❑Other Number of Structures
Discharges& Stream Impacts
. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation`? ❑Yes/XNo ❑NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

. S-
Facility Number: (�f — � • Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
. rr Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Wti's-k- oni
Spillway?: e
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): H
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No [:3NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan? X
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes . No ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes XNo ❑NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,'setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need El Yes XNo El NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑Heavy Metals (Cu,Zn, etc.)
[:] PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ElApplication Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) Gal 51in__4 , S,VkA {'a UYl��
V
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes XNc ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes VNc ❑ NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? [:] Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes VNo
El NA El NE
1$. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
f kt�P 1Jor11L10i) d/l broad l ►�ls 61) ! •
4 c a
�21peAr 1-c nrar Po= 13 !1 %Sq�Z /Z �' = i!,5_�`AIt
SK�tM,
Reviewer/Inspector Name � � ,1`tz� �� Phone: .) '77/ —5�._
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: � 5:Z-2_0LL
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

I .Facility Number: — D f Inspection Q' �
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑Yes kNo ❑NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑Yes )<No ❑NA ❑NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑Design El Maps ❑Other 1�.�
21. Does recordkeeping need improvement? �!Yes El No ❑NA El NE
E Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analys' oil Analysi El Waste'Transfers
ff-Rainfall St���ng L'9 C rop Yield onthly and 1" Rain Inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes )No ❑NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑No NA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑\\No ANA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑Yes ONo ❑NA ❑NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑Yes )<XNo
No El NA El NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑Yes ElNA ❑NE
. and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑Yes 1�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑Yes /XNo ElNA El NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ,�C`
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑Yes *No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes V No ❑NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
� r ✓✓21. �ff oI � 2,011�
0A Ca k.&n � 2xa/ 1 t �. ✓�e.�.`tf, �c J�r,L
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality
I ��2�Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation �O
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit lCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: J� Arrival Time: Departure Time: LI I : l� County: Q-V16LAC49— Region: L05e-0
Farm Name: D a-I r C Owner Email: -
Owner Name' i t l I"`7 _ - -•- - -- Phone: 336 ,3 16 •3 77
1 �Mailing Address: 3 r S r r -'� ` a
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 7DexV1'4 L i ndTitle: Phone No: -2 l� q j A, _
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: �° � Longitude: °
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Finish ❑ La er Dai Cow o-2 J� ,
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Non-La ei El Dairy Calf
❑Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifer
❑Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder El Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Gilts ❑Non-Layers
El Pullets ❑Beef Feeder
❑ Boars ❑ Beef Brood Co
❑Turkeys
Other 11:1 urkey Poults
❑Other JE1 Other Number of Structures: 4
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes �No ❑ NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field ❑Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [-]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 14No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ' Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: tJ — 0 Date of Inspection � •
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
$tructuTe l �} jructu re 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 5 �. 'Ybn
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? )(Yes [INo ❑NA ElNE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes �4 o ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?
IL Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Pondmg ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside
�o'fy Area
�
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) u
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[]Yes ❑No JN'NA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes J'&No ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
Fd
Sot "zm Spa �Lq't
o �6P r b road de s a
p
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name W Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Q
12128104 Continued

Facility Dumber: a --{ *of Inspection 8
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑Yes )No ❑ NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes j No ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Do s record keeping need improvement? w. 13 Yes /' o ❑ NA ❑NE
[Waste Application ;tl(y Freeboard Waste Analysis oil Analysis Waste Transfers '` rotation
ainfall Shock' rp Yield 120 Minute Inspections �/IVIonthly and 1" Rain Inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to installand maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑No ONA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes t No ❑ NA ❑NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑No XNA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑Yes o ❑ NA ElNE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �(No ❑ NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
.-
/ a
3.3 bi550[U>?4
ti\J0,5fe_ r_Jn@ V5 s
PIL P
Page 3 of 3 12/28/04

C� y'a�rF ,Qc Incident Report N W- zol l)- Fc - 6s76
Report Number: 201001664
Incident Type: Non-Compliance Reporting On Site Contact:
Category: APS-Animal First/MidlLast Name:
Incident Started: 02/08/2010 Company Name:
County: Alamance Phone:
City: Snow Camp Pager/Mobile Phone: /
Farm#: 001-0012
Responsible Party: Reported By:
Owner: First/Mid/Last Name:
Permit: AWC010012 Company Name:
Facility: Lindley Dairy Inc. Farm Address:
First Name: W
Middle Name: Joe City/State/Zip:
Last Name: Lindley Phone:
Address 3159 E Greensboro Chapel Hi Pager/Mobile Phone: /
City/State/Zip: Snow Camp NC 2734991
Phone:
Material Category: Estimated Qty: UOM Chemical Name Reportable Qty. lbs. Reportable Qty. kgs.
DD:MM:SS Decimal Position Method:
Latitude: Position Accuracy:
Longitude: Position Datum:
Location of Incident: Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road
Address:
City/State/Zip
Report Created 05/14/10 12:15 PM Page l

CauseJObservation: Directions:
Action Taken: Comments:
Incident Questions:
Did the Material reach the Surface Water? Unknown Conveyance
Surface Water Name?
Did the Spill result in a Fish Kill? Unknown Estimated Number of fish?
If the Spill was from a storage tank indicate type. (Above Ground or Under Ground)
Containment? Unknown
Cleanup Complete? Unknown
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft: Unknown Groundwater Impacted : Unknown
Access to Farm Animal Population Spray Availability
Structure Questions
Report Created 05/14/10 12:15 PM Page 2

•
Access to Farm
Farm accessible from the main road? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
Animal Population
Confined?
❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
Depop? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
Feed Available?
❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑NE
Mortality?
❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
Spray Availability
Pumping equipment?
❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
Available Fields?
❑ Yes ❑Na ❑ NA ❑NE
Structure Questions
Breached?
❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
Inundated?
❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
Overtopped? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
Water on outside wall?
❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
Poor dike conditions?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑NE
Waste Structure Type Waste Structure Identi inches Plan Due Date Plan Recieved Date Level OK Date
Waste Pond WASTE POND 18.00 10-02-19 12:00:00
Event Type Event Date Due Date Comment
Incident closed
Requested Additional Information
Report Received
Referred to Regional Office-Primary Contact
Report Entered 2010-05-11 01:56:31
Incident Start 2010-02-08 08:00:00
Report Created 05/14/10 12:15 PM Page 3

J
• i
Standard Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
Other Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
DWQ Information:
Report taken By: Report Entered By: Regional Contact:
Melissa Rosebrock
Phone:
Date/Time: 2010-05-11 01:56:31 PM
Referred Via:
Did DWQ request an additional written report?
If yes,What additional information is needed?
Report Created 05/14/10 12:15 PM Page 4

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number ,Z Division of Soil and Water Conservation 1
Q Other Agency 1
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit XRoutine 0 Complaint
yp00Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:11� Departure Time: � �S� County: [ UCO Region:
Farm Name: Li n ,eu T)a-1,r W / A C C Owner Email:
Owner Name: U) • SO�- L� ►1/I ! Phone:
Mailing Address: S� G ' re- bb ro - 7.3 yy
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: li Title: Phone No: _33L12�
6 Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: ;_ Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number::
Location of Farm: Latitude: �o ©IU�d 1
1 Longitude: ®° u t ®
G 001 S. fro �St 0,50 CY IeA, � t vrh f-
N � �jh-t , Farm 15
m�
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ La er Dairy Cow
• a
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Non-La ei I El Dairy Calf
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Dai tieifei
El Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑Dry Cow
El Farrow to Feeder ElNon-Dai
❑Farrow to Finish ❑ Layers
El Beef Stocker
El Gilts ❑ Non-Layers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars ❑ Pullets
❑Turkeys
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
Other E] urkey Poults
❑Other I JE1 Other Number of Structures:
Discharp,es& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )�No ❑NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance maci-made? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0No ❑NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility[Number: — j�-- 0 Date of Inspection '=-t-";� "'F' •
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
aa a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes �,❑No ❑NA ❑NE
L U Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
a Identifier: V,.b STP_ y)j
O Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑Yes 1 J No ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks) �[
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require p(] Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement? ]�G
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement? /
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑Total Phosphorus ❑Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acceptabl Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 06No ❑NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes *�No El NA El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[--]Yes ❑No XNA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lad:adequate acreage for land application'? ❑Yes VNo ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? XYes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
Sol i�5 Go n�,� h ecfi m f� S'�c5c��-►rQ c � ? 1�1� 7�
I
viewerllnspector Name (� r- L Phone: 7 71viewerllnspector Signature. Date:
12128104 Continuer!

Facility Number: l of Inspection •
Required Records& Documents �,/
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes _[ (No ❑NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes J No ❑NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Doe record keeping neeJVW2kly
provement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
aste ApYstocking'
tion Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil alysisLYI RainfallCro Yield s pQ Monthl and 1" Rain Ins ections Weather Code
)' -- Y r
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ) ]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑No XNA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No XNA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ]No El NA El NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? / ,
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes X No ❑NA ❑NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 9yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and[/or Drawings: r��,�-�
a l OZ�g so 1 l T �� P O�'��
• �O 5
3 -
1X�
ALIU
-
. /h p
Page 3 of 3 12128104

9
Division of-WaterQtiali
Fac>Ihty N mt er _ Division of Soil and WateiZOnservation
�!
­0 Other.Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 'V Departure Time: "It� County: Region: men
Farm Name: �1)C_ - Owner Email:
Owner Name: LL.> -e- . 1Q6 1@ t.t Phone: -J
`- 1 1 A 7 3
Mailing Address: �1 �q���p�'ISt�dro ,��{/l�,p 1 �/ a• , �nOC��
Physical Address: 1
Facility Contact: w �QJ111a U �IAk V_A-4 Title: Phone No: _� 7�0!44 .3,E
Onsite Representative: tA_U Integrator:
Certified Operator: td LindOperator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: w o I Y
NC— $7 Roa� L+ & urn I-i � rarM ;S l Y.;?-
Mkles on rl ht
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer Daia,Cow 1507
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Non-Layer FT Daia Calf
❑Feeder to Finish, - ❑ Dairy Heifer
❑Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑Farrow to Feeder El Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Finish ❑ Lavers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Gilts ❑Non-Layers
❑ Pullets El Beef Feeder
El Boars ❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑Turkeys
Other ❑Turkey Poults
❑Other ❑Other Number of Structures:
Discharges& Stream Impacts jNo
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑NA ElNE
Discharge originated at; ElStructure ❑Application Field ❑Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Pj�No ❑ NA ❑NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

i
Facility Number: • Date of Inspection I It A I hS
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes �(No ❑NA ❑NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: \K
Spillway?: t?
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes YNo ❑NA ElNE
(ie/large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑Yes [I-�No ElNA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 Ibs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Sail
❑Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? Yes o ❑NA ❑ItS
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ElNA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination:❑ Yes ElNo P(NA ElNE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El yes �(No
XN0 ElNA ElNE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ElYes ❑NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Trees c L - t� S
40
Reviewer/Inspector Name i Phone: a�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ( t0
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Ote of Inspection it 1.11,2
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No El NA El NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ElDesign El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need im ovement?. ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
as Application ee Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ it �/,thlly
ss III
❑ Rainfall ❑ S kin -ro Yield ❑ and 1" Rain Inspections &VeatherCode
g P P
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
21 It-selected..did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment'? ❑ Yes ❑No XNA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑No XNA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 39fNo ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [yNo ❑NA ❑NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes DNo ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑Yes [YNo ❑NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal'?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern'? ❑ Yes XNo ❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes P(No ❑NA ❑NE
General Permit`? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes � o ❑NA El NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes VNo ❑NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
a aoo Sol �-esf resu if s 2 sbziu�mj
.�- r11 u1S1
&try crop &Adid ? o p
boo IV W i b�a -iar� ea l efe� - 4-P�
12128104

qpDivision of Water Quality
[Facility Number 9Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
E
f Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
n for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral Q Emergency Q IOther ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: (0 Arrival Time:` Departure Time: M= County: -Region: 1A_)5LP_-O
Farm Name: Ta 1Q,1{ A _tiyT�ln� Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1.4 r)IJ eau Phone: _3 _
Mailing Address: cae-zLS 6 o rQ `Ci g�,j �- )n o u-) a 73q�
Physical Address: 26114A_
Facility Contact: I� L 1�.�.I Title: Phone No: 3 �- IN,
Onsite Representative: NJ idL` +�� Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: a` 1
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ®e ®, Longitude: e
NC l Z-7 5, G60/C `d- to r-rl r^ i h4 . Par wi i51 JA
I /a rn i 1 es o n le ;+
,
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population `—'Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer Dairy Cow02
❑Wean to Feeder ILI Non-Layer 9 Dairy Calf
❑Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Non-Dairy
El Farrow to Finish ❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Gilts ❑Non-Layers
❑ Pullets El Beef Feeder
El Boars ❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑Turkeys
Other Ej urkey Puults
❑ Other I I 1 10 Other Number of Structures: ILI
Discharges& Stream Impacts
t. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes �ZNo ❑NA ❑NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field ❑Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes WNo ❑NA ❑NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State „ ❑Yes XINo ❑NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Q i — Z Date of Inspection Z (' d
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 9 No ❑NA ❑NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: P
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): L
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes 4/No ❑ NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? WYes ❑No ElNA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes 4o ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes >No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need El Yes ❑ NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes )?'No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
[] PAN ❑PAN ]O%or 10 lbs El Total Phosphorus ❑Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑Outside of Acc table Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) _4A ,
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? >rYes El No ElNA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ElYes pd No ❑NA ❑NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑Yes ❑No VNA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes VrNo ❑NA ❑NE
I& Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes )�No ❑NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
. an K
ipMJ
Reviewer/lnspector Name ro Phone: 1 _5 `bj
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Oate of Inspection
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑Yes ❑NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
the appropirate box. ❑ VVLJp ❑Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑ Other
21. D es record keeping need ' pr vement? ❑ Yes �No ❑NA ❑NE
Waste Appl' anon W ekly FreeboardWw"
aste Analysis Soil nalysis ��-.a�►s€ets '
Rainfall Stocking Crop Yield nspe �ib1i5�-{Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes J o ❑NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑ No VNA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNo El NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑No b NA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes qNo ❑NA ❑NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes IwNo ❑NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? 6z
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge,freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑Yes [VNo ❑NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes 15�No ❑NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
C�' - = 4. 3 /ioo
S w ✓ as �J
4
aW n� t6 �
CV I (PA-PJ ?)
l 4s. P A W Su4-,-- PW o OPMA�Q
ALO ct'*
f Q QT�
t I2/ 04 .—.2—o 0
U,

C
V
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010012 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWQ010012 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Alamance Region. Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: D1/12120 Entry Time:09:50 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM Incident#:
Farm Name: Lindley DaiInc. Farm Owner Email:
Owner: W Joe Lindley Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3159 E Greensboro Chapel Hill Rd _ know Camp NC 273429175
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°53'59" Longitude: 79>9'50"
NC87 south of Graham 13 miles to E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road and turn right. 1 112 miles on left. 1st house past Spring Church.
Question Areas:
0 Discharges&Stream Impacts 0 Waste Collection&Treatment 0 Waste Application
0 Records and Documents 0 Other Issues
Certified Operator:David A Lindley Operator Certification Number. 21322
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name David Lindley Phone:
On-site representative David Lindley Phone:
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone: [phone]
Ext.383
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
3. Suggest digging retention lole in fenced area of the pasture to help keep silage leachate out of the creek. Should allow longer
retention and greater dilution.
7. Need to spray broadleaf weeds and cut small trees on waste pond embankment.
9. Need to build up law spots on the stocktrail to help contain waste solids.
21. Suggest re-sampling one field that was very high(approx.2000).
21. Records look good.
5124105=4.1 lbs. N11000 gal.
Page: 1

u
Permit: AWC010012 Owner-Facility: W Joe Lindley Facility Number: 010012
Inspection Date: 01/1212005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
0 Cattle-Milk Cow 225 125
Total Design Capacity: 225
Total SSLW: 315,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 31.20 3t3.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC010012 Owner-Facility: W Joe Lindley Facility Number. 010012
Inspection Date: 01/1212005 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Disrh rgeG&Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ moo
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
b.Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c.Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d.Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3.Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Waste Collection.Storage&Treatment Yes No NA NE
4.is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes,is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed(I.ed large trees,severe erosion, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
seepage,etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
closure plan?
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑
8.Do any of the structures tack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
11.is there evidence of incorrect application? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? Cl
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu,Zn,etc)? ❑
PAN? ❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P2O5? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Fescue(Hay,Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Corn(Silage)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Page: 3

Permit: AWC010012 Owner-Facility: W Joe Lindley Facility Number: 010012
Inspection Date: 01/12/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Wastes Application Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
17,Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NF
19.Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20,Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21.Does record keeping need improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? Cl
Weather code? ■
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? Cl
Rainfall? ■
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall&monthly? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form(NPDES only)? ❑
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23,If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment(NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ❑
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25.Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26.Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

• •
Permit: AWC010012 Owner-Facility: W Joe Lindley Facility Number: 010012
inspection Date: 01/12/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes_No NA NE
28.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ M ❑ ❑
29.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality ❑ ❑
rates that exceed normal rates?
30.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional Air Quality ❑ ❑ ❑
representative immediately.
31.Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ❑ ❑
32.Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑
33.Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

tt -:
ivision of Water Quality_
Fac�hty Number 2 Dwision.ofSoil and Water Co e�tion a ,
Q Other°Agency '
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Y h
Date of Visit: $ O5 Arrival Time: r Departure Time: [= County: C e Region: y�7w
Farm Name: 1,e IY6 r q _r T'n G Owner Email:
Owner Name: O e-- 1 Phone: }
Mailing Address: _ Ci 62 bo ro — S
Phvsical Address: - - -
Facility Contact: Tit]e: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: bodi d L1 jn Integrator:
Certified Operator: D 0-VI Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ®o ®i Longitude: JW
o
N(� -7 50 6) L . Co O • `d- +L)t-n , FLLr—M iS
1 'Ia rn 1425 a,J ►eV+ . U
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish t Layer Dairy Cowes
[] Wean to Feeder ❑ Nan-Laver 0 Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Non-Dairy
❑ Lavers
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts ❑Non-Layers ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars ❑ Pullets
❑Beef Brood Cow
- - ❑Turkeys - - - -
Other ❑Turkey Poults
❑Other _1 ❑Other Number of Structures: UJ
Discharges& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes �No ❑NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(0allons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ElYes �No ElNA ElNE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State IYes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 01 — I Z 40 Date of Inspection �~0
Waste Collection & Treatment VNo
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes ElNA ClNE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure ID Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: y��CJI.� Pon
Spillway?: 2.
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ;XNo ❑NA ❑NE
(ie/large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes KNo ❑NA ❑NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 19Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require yes El ElNA ElNE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or l0 lbs ❑Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) A(4, 44 . ZZA& ,
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ElYes *o ❑NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 10
No El NA El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑Yes {❑No VNA ❑NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes VNo ❑NA ❑NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
_4 e3e�t[-C4� 0
fewer/Inspector Name ram. Phone: — �� ��3 8
Reviewer/Inspector Signat a Date: �O
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Q j — 1 — D:e'Inspectionto/or
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WDP ❑Checklists ❑ Design
g [I Map ❑Other
21. Does record keeping neeJW
nprovement? If yes, check the appropriate b below. Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑NE
L1_Sl1__�_ T
❑ aste Apple ation kly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Anal sis - n
Rain all Stocking Crop Yield Monthly and I" Rain Ins a„ions eather de
22. Did the facile tail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes ❑No XNA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 06 ❑Yes No ❑,/NA El NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? El Yes El No L5.NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes *o ElNA ElNE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ElYes El No VNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes VNo ❑NA ❑NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes )ifNo ❑NA ❑NE
General Permit? (ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application)
32. Did Reviewer/[nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑Yes VNo ❑NA ❑NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes �No ❑ NA ❑NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
F9boos ?
66,
.5^/.2 os_ q. 1 /4,5. N//wo
ldx�
12128104

^�.���y.:• �� -..t.� r -
} v �1VlSlon�Of(Watek "allty
Ul
uvtstori otrEtSoil andyVl!ater Conservation
QOther�A`g ncYt`�
Type of Visit O+ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3/3/2004 Time: 1240
Facilih•Number 12
5,Not O erational O Below Threshold
Permitted M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered pate Last Operated or Above I'hreshold:
Farm Name: Undley.l?aixx.lnc,.F.al:m....................................................... County: AIAo jugr............................... WISM)-.....
Owner Name: ��,><RQ - - - --- - - - - 1�insllfy.- --- - - - - - - - --- - Phone,No:
flailing Address: ><5.9..1a. reensltA.t rG.haia�l..HAIL.fop.ci...................................... Sam-COMP—MC.................................................. Z7349..............
Facility Contact: DaYid.l inftx.....................................l'itle: ............................................... Phone No: 33C, .7.C.94 G.......
Onsite Representative: D11Yld-L,lAd1¢Y- --- - --- -.- - ----------- ----- -- Integrattrr: - - - - - --------- --- - ----------- - -
Certified Operator:Dayld.A................................ Julldley............................................. Operator Certification Number:21.32,2.............................
Location of Farm:
NC87 south of Graham 13 miles to E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road and turn right. 1 112 miles on left. 1 st house past Spring
Church.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 ' S3 59 Longitude 79 ' 19 50 '•
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Ca parity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 225 135
❑Feeder to Finish JE1 Non-Layer I Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 225
❑ Gilts
[I Boars Total SSLW 315,OO
Number of Lagoons 0 F IF
Dischartes& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: --._W staP.oA---- ----•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•- --•----- •--•--•----- ••--•--•--•--•--•--.._._-.. ---------------------------
-•-••--•-----•----•--•----
Freeboard(inches): 24
12112103 9�9 � Continued

Facility Number: 01-12 Date of Inspection 3/3/2004 ,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
[]Excessive Ponding [:] PAN [] Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn(Silage&Grain) Sorghum Small Grain(Wheat, Barley, Fescue(Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional ❑ Yes ®No
Air Quality representative immediately,
Comments('refer to:questfon#) Explain any YES answers and/or any'recommendations or`an other`comments:
L1sedr�a�w�ngs of facilltyntob'utter a plain situntions {,useaddit�onaages as necessary,) , ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes t
e _
3. Operator plans to sow grass seed in fenced area to absorb additional silage leachate. Mr. Lindley also plans to try a gravel trench w/in
60 days near the exisiting catch basin at base of other silo. Check next visit to evaluate effectiveness.
23. Records look good. Soil samples have been sent for 2004.
October 2003 waste analysis=3.7 lbs. N/1000 gal.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Meliss4 Rosebrock n
Reviewer/Inspector Sign ature:.._�ilf P i /1 L Date:
12112103 ! Cogrrinued

Facility Number: 01-12 �of Inspection 31312U04
Required Records& Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑Waste Application ❑Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑ Yes ® No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no,skip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes ® No
31. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑Crop Yield Form ❑Rainfall ❑Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Addiiio altC•_omments an r Drawings: x
12112103

vision of Water Quality
vision of ,6il and"Water Conservation
Q Other Agency a
Type of Visit C mpliance Inspection O Operation Review O lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
�[ Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
®Permitted ©Certified ©Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above'Threshold
/Farm Name: .. �1 � .. �r - m County: ... ..[.C�.M ce......... .......................
Owner Name, ..Y.1t.�....... Qt— L1 { �... . .... Phone No: Sl`'. �-:..r - ' .?.,(............... ........ ................................ ............ ..
cc re
Mailing Address:
.5 .-.........1 .:..... .... ... .. �.!SM06� .. ........... ..1��-a7.3
��
FacilitvContact: ��......... A ................Title: 33 ..... .....----- .........
.Je"'v �t� Phone No • 1-L33
Onsite Representative: �J�VI �. . . Integrator:.................................................................................
.....
........................... .... ..........................................
Certified Operator: bamtj-...A........r!� rid. ..................................... Operator Certification Number:.. u,..............
Location of Farm:
tiC Owl S 7 500h i& E. (`greens b6 ra— M r t
❑Swine ❑ Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude Longitude • ®"
Design Ceirri nt Design Current Design Current
1.
Swine. -Ca ace 'Po eilation: Poultry Ca aci P,o elation:, .Cattle Ca acE jPo nlatton
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer Dairy �zs
ElFeeder to Finish JEI Non-Layer Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other r
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design'.GapSciLY o� a
❑Gilts
❑Boars il Totaz:ssW. 316 000
Ntieiher'of Lagoons
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes [ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? KYes // ��No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? Spillway [:]Yes XNO
Strut ure 1 tructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: :.....1..� [ .
--------- ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 0 — Date of Inspection •
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes No
seepage, etc.) , /
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑yes 6d No
closure plan? 7C
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑Yes No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes N0
❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Lrn r L r-Q) 5furt!-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those esignated in the Certified An(Jal Waste Management Pl (CAWMP)? ❑Yes No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes X
No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yeso
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes )�<o
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes A No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ElYes �No
roads,building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional ❑Yes Ao
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments(refer to question#) Expla-' any YFS`aw-. ers and/or any,recommendations or.any.other comtu nts,.-
"Use:drawtngs'of facility to better explaW" situations.(use additional pages as necessary}: I Q Field Copy Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name T dC
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date:
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: — �of Inspection
Reguired Records &DocumenN
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes �No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps, etc.) ❑Yes No
23. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes o
❑Waste Application ❑Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes *o
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems, over application)
Yes No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit?(If no,skip questions 31-35) ❑Yes No
31. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ❑No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑Yes ❑No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes ❑No
❑Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form ❑Rainfall ❑Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditianal Comments and/or Drawings`.
1v
-=L�O
a
12112103

&chnical Assistance Site Visit Rep "
DI ion of Soil and Water Conservation--
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service
Q Soil and Water Conservation District
Q Other...
Facility Number Date: 121103 Time: 9:30 Time On Farm: 60 WSRO
Farm Name Lindley Dairy Inc. Farm County Alamance Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 3159 E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road Snow Camp NC 27349
Onsite
Representative David Lindley Integrator
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
®Operation Review Q Routine
❑Compliance Inspection (pilot only) Q Response to DWQ/DENR referral
❑Technical Assistance Q Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
[]Confirmation for Removal Q Response to complaint/local referral
❑ No Animals-Date Last Operated: O Requested by producer/integrator
❑Operating below threshold O Follow-up
O Emergency
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑ Horse 0 Other...
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non-Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ® Dairy 225 140
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Non-Dairy
❑Gilts
❑ Boars ❑Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑yes ®no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑yes ®no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑yes ®no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. 1s there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑yes ®no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑yes ®no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier WSP
Level (Inches) 36
CROP TYPES hmall grain silage I Fescue-graze I lCom, Silage =hoybeans
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES GaI32 HdC2 Ta132
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
1 03/10103

0 0
Facility Number 01 - 12 Date: 8/21/03
PARAMETER Q No assistance provided/requested
❑8. Waste spill leaving site TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed Provided
❑9. Waste spill contained on site
25.Waste Plan Revision or Amendment ❑ ❑
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
❑ 11. Level in storm storage 26.Waste Plan Conditional Amendment ❑ ❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan w/producer ❑ ❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
[113. Waste structure needs maintenance 28. Forms Need (list in comment section) ® ❑
29. Missing Components(list in comments) ❑ ❑
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or< 10 lbs. 30. 21-I.0200 re-certification ❑ ❑
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading 31. Five&Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA) ❑ ❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records 32. Irrigation record keeping assistance ❑ ❑
[118. Late/missing waste analysis 33. Organize/computerization of records ❑ ❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
[120. Late/missing soils analysis 34. Sludge Evaluation ❑ ❑
❑21. Crop needs improvement 35. Sludge or Closure Plan ❑ ❑
❑22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan 36. Sludge removallclosure procedures ❑ ❑
❑23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency 37.Waste Structure Evaluation ❑ ❑
❑24. Deficient sprayfield conditions 38. Structure Needs Improvement ❑ ❑
39.Operation &Maintenance Improvements ❑ ❑
40. Marker check/calibration ❑ ❑
RequlatoEy Referrals 41. Site evaluation ❑ ❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date: 42. Irrigation Calibration ❑ ❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
❑Other... 43. Irrigation system design/installation El El
Date: 44. Secure irrigation information(maps,etc.) ❑ ❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS 45. Operating improvements
p g p rovements(pull signs, etc.) ❑ ❑
MADE BY OPERATION 46.Wettable Acre Determination ❑ ❑
The waste plan was revised in March for new 47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks ❑ ❑
crop rotations and fields.
48.Crop evaluation/recommendations ❑ ❑
2. Mr. Lindley has extended the silage leachate 49. Drainage workievaluation ❑ ❑
ditch suggested by the DWQ inspector. 50. Land shaping,subsoiling,aeration,etc. ❑ ❑
3 51. Runoff control,stormwater diversion, etc. ❑ ❑
52. Buffer improvements ❑ ❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying,etc.) ❑ ❑
4. 54. Mortality BMPs ❑ ❑
55.Waste operator education (NPDES) El El
5' 56. Operation &maintenance education ❑ ❑
57. Record keeping education ❑ ❑
6. 58. Crop/forage management education ❑ ❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education ❑ ❑
2 03/10/03

Facility Number 01 - 12 Date: I 8/21/03
COMMENTS:
Waste analysis: 5-27-03 LSD 7.7 Ibs.N/1000 gals. B, 10.7 Ibs.N11000 SI AL
Soil test dated 8-15-03
Facility and records are in good shape.
Mr. Lindley has done a good job managing his waste pond levels with the amount of rainfall this year.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST JRocky Durham
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 8/22/03 Entered By: lRocky Durham
3 03/10/03

Ap' ision of Water Quality
rvision of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number O1 12 Date of visit: 03/19/2003 Thirke: 1215
0 Not O perational 0 Below Threshold
®Permitted M Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................
Farm Name: lai dlex.1?axr. '.. >xe,.Farxrl............................. ................................. County: Alamaime......................................... WISR.0........
............ .
OwnerName: 1!'..�IQe.................................... LjUdIey........................................................ Phone No: 33.6.47.6:�.714...........................................................
Mailing Address: 31.5 .. xee�asbQxo-. laal�eA.dill. saali..................................... Snow..CAmp...N.C.................................................. 2.7.349..............
Facility Contact: A:aYM.1,iudey.................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: 33.6.3.7.6,99,3.6.......................
Onsite Representative:D3.Y.1d.UAldjgy.......................................................................... Integrator ................
Certified Operator:l?a.Y.1.dA................................. Undivy............................................. Operator Certification Number:Z13.22............................
Location of Farm:
C87 south of Graham 13 miles to E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road and turn right. 1 1/2 miles on left. 1st house past Spring
I,-
Church.
❑Swine ❑ Poultry M Cattle ❑Horse Latitude F 59 Longitude 79 OF 19 50
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder JEI Layer ®Dairy 225 126
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 225
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 315,000
Number of Lagoons Q ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Fieid A rea
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Di_scharp_es& Stream imaacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes M No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes M No
Waste Collection &"Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway ❑Yes M No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Wasl c.Paud..... ................................... ................. ..
Freeboard(inches): 26
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01--12 Date of Inspection 03/19/2043 •
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/trees, severe erosion, +
❑ Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Small Grain Overseed Fescue(Graze) Corn(Silage &Grain) Soybeans
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records &Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists, design, maps,etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
8. Stock trail repairs look great. Suggest extending silage ditch.
19. Operator to send in soil samples soon.
19. Records look real good'.
11/18/02 waste analysis=2.1 tbs. N/1000 gal.
26., 29.-32. Not applicable to this facility.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Meli Rose rock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. a& VIVI Ilk AL& Date: ILI
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01-12 Ir f
Inspection 03/1 412 0 03 .
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑Yes No
roads, building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:
J&
05103101

• 1.2 PM
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint (:)Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of 'ime:
FaciIih•Number
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted �Erd
Certified ©Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: �,�l._I_L� Tr)C1. County: n a Y1C�L1�II (�
Owner Name: J� -Toe, Lf Phone No: 3 36 - 3 6, .� -7 3 I
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: 61
Onsite Representative: S)a Ali U n Integrator:
Certified Operator: bowid A` i ndLj Operator Certification Number: c�2 1 3 a �
Location of Farm:
V? so � 50- L M r4o'hf 1 1 a nil 5 eb ton on
[:]Swine ❑Poultry Cattle ❑Horse Latitude ' ®u Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca acitv.. Population Poultry Ca acitti Population C the Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Laver Dairy _ vZ
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Laver ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW OOd
Number of L goons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑La oon Area ❑S rav Field Area
Holding Ponds/Salid Traps ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes.notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2- Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑YesNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? Spillway ❑Yes No
tru re Structure 2 Structure� ((( ����• Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: � in� l
Freeboard(inches): d�
05103101 j f. Continued
1 j2

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats tD the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, El Yes No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do anv of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? XYes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes )eNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes 910
11. Is there evidence of over application? El Excessive Ponding El PAN ❑H aulic Overload ❑Yes No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ wi those designated in the tertifid Animal Waste Ma agement Plan(C P)? ❑Yes Wo
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes WNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes X,
Required Records&Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certtf d Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WliP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) / / El Yes �No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irttgntien,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes XNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes XNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to:question,#): :Explain anyXES,ans*ers andlorran rei:crmmeudattons or any other cbmmenm
s o Use drawings p fficility-'to better.ez lains:tniations..(ctsera
d Field Conv
❑Fina9 Notes
l
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 23
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
dar Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ---Q
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes \o
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation.asphalt. ❑Yes vo
roads.building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. NVere any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s).inoperable shutters.etc.) es >To
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? , o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
a� • �- . - 3p?. Not r ►ca-lo le ` n i 5 Q ci j iJ A,
11
L
I� I [ 000 -
� l�
05103101

ision of Water Quality
ision of Soil and Water Conservation
O-Other Agency
E
Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
or Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7/10/2002 Time: 9:15
Facilit��Number pl 12
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted M Certified Q Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...............
Farm Name: LiA.d1 .DaAryJacJFarM...................... .. County: Alaana ur......................................... .w..SRQ........
OwnerName: W. ,, log.................................... ]1.adivy....................................................... Phone No: 33.6.-.376:3.774...........................................................
Iti'taituig Address: 31 9.. .. .r.���a b�rA-QlaaRel.Hill.LtQ.alb..................................... SOO.W..C.Amp...Nc.................................................. 2.7.3.4.9..............
FacilitvContact: ..............................................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative:jQa.Y.id.,Utxdltry.................. .... Integrator: .............................................................................
Certified Opera tor:Da.Y.ld.A................................. LixidIvy............................................. Operator Certification Number:2.13.22.............................
Location of Farm:
C87 south of Graham 13 miles to E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road and turn right. 1 1/2 miles on left. 1st house past Spring
Church.
❑Swine ❑ Poultry M Cattle ❑ Horse latitude 35 OF 53 59 Longitude 79 • 19 50
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ro
Dairy 225 150
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 225
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 315,000
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps 1 JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes M No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes M No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes M No
Waste Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑Yes M No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 84
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01—t 2 Bate of Inspection 7/10/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the in rity of any of the structures observed?(ie/treeT�evere erosion, ❑ Yes ®No '
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes N No
12. Crop type Small Grain(Wheat, Barley, Corn(Silage&Grain) Fescue(Graze) Summer Annuals
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes N No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes N No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes N No
I& Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists, design,maps, etc.) ❑Yes N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis &soil sample reports) ❑Yes N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑Yes N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes N No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question ff): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy N Final Notes
Facility and records look good. _+
Mr. Lindley is in the process of doing repairs to the stock-trail to reduce any runoff. Repairs were reported needed here by,DWQ.
The WUP is also being revised to include summer annuals on additional fields.
U_m;
Reviewer/Inspector Name Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
O5103101 Continued

I?acility Number: 01--12 Da f Inspection 7/10/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads,building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pertnanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Additional omments an orDrawings:
Waste analysis: 3-11-02 LSD 6.3 lbs.N/1000 gals. B, 8.9 S.I. A.
Soil analysis dated 3-22-02
05103101

Qsion"of Water Qualify
ion of Soil and Water Conservation
QOther Agency
Type of Visit ©Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 01 l2 Date or visit: 2l12/2002 'Time: 0930
0 Nat O erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted M Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......•••......
Farm Name: Unid1cyJD.WryJne.Ja► m......................................................... County: Alamwice......................................... wsm........
OwnerName: W. .....luv.................................... 1.tutdlliY....................................................... Phone No: fi- 7.f- 7..7.4..........................................................
Mailing Address: 1 9.1~.. a �ashalro- btaRel.hill.RQ.asl..................................... snow-CAMP..Nc................................................. Z-7.3.49.............
Facility Contact: Dayld..Lintdky................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: 3.3.6.37.6,9936.......................
OnsiteRepresentative:Da.Y.isl.I. ndley.................................... ....................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:Daylid.A................................. Uudle3'............................................. Operator Certification Number:2l322.............................
Location of Farm:
r
C87 south of Graham 13 miles to E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road and turn right. 1 112 miles on left. Ist house past Spring
hurch.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 • 53 59 Longitude F 50
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ® Dairy 225 165
❑Feeder to Finish ID Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 25 2
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 315,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagw)n Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges lC: Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed.did it reach Water of the State'?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection R Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Waste.Pand...... .............................
Freeboard(inches): 32
05103101 Continued
G Q �l

Facility Number: 01-12 Date of Inspection 2/12/2002 • F
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ® No
{If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage& Grain) Small Grain(Wheat, Barley, Fescue(Graze) Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
t5. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(iel irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes IN No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑ Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ®No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YE a S answers and/or n m y recomendations or any other comments.`
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.{use additiona! pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
8. Stocktrail between waste storage pond and farm pond needs extensive repair since waste from stocktrail is getting into freshwater ditc
that goes to the creek. Suggest contacting SWCDINRCS for assistance. Will check progress during next inspection.
8. Leachate situation is better. Operator plans to extend the diversion ditch out further and then fence cattle out of this area.
Records look real good?
w
E
wer/Inspector Name Melissa Rosebrock
wer/Inspector Signature. Date: ( �
O5103101 Continued

• Facility Number: 01-12 Dab Inspection 2/12/2002
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes [] No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑No
ittai-a >omments an or rawmgs•;-- , ;yam_ ._ -: � : 71
05103101

!Vision of Water Qual1q,
Di vision of Soil and Water Conservation
`0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Kcompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
A(Permitted Wertified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Oper ted or Above Threshold:
e 1 I � -y_
Farm Name: ��/1�h111 �L1 ti �11L' 1 County: Q�r�1r
Owner Name: v" ' -S�"� �� Phone No: 3�3l• 3-7t✓• 3 -1 7 --7
RlaiIing Address: M' '
Facility Contact: L�DiA,Li+f Title: Phone No: 8 31
Onsite Representative: �,.
Ut 1 &\P-u _ _ _ _ Integrator:
�a
Certified Operator: VA U1Qi�1� Operator Certification Number: a 13 .2
Location of Farm: +
i 5 rig ' • 117Y iZ Fes m _
7
❑Swine ❑Poultry Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' ' " Longitude ' ®"
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacior PopulationC te Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder I JE1 Layer I I Dairy .a� �
ElFeeder to Finish ❑Non-La er Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts El Boars Total SSLW � �
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE3 S rav Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 7VNo
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b" If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes XNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes xNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? Spillway ❑Yes D(No
'■ ,Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Y�I� 4e- 0"M
Freeboard(inches):
05103101 Continued
ma'lc• +ifs!

• •
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below El MS E9 mr'
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ANo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes gNo
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? o
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s),inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes t!�No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes XNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
05103101

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes KNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? X Yes PC No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes NO
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ANo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes RIO
12. Crop type 54u re /
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those d signated in the Cc
fied Animal Wast Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes X&O
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes .XNo
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes�—Ik No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes )<No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes �(No
Required Records&Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes WNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of th Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) vJ/ El yes ZN
o
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) El Yeso
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yeso
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes �No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes 7RIo
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes XNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes gNo
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any o#her comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary): f_ Field Copy ❑Final Notes
06
Reviewer/lnspectorName V�5r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

v►sio of'Water Quality
Umvision
n of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date nr Visit: t3l20120U1 Time: 123Q Printed con: 8/20/2001
O1 12
0 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
®Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Liu divy..Dair'..ltxr.Yarm........................ .............................................. .... County: Alamatice......................................... W,SRQ........
OwnerName: W....lag.................................... UlIdIcy....................................................... Phone No: 33.6:-3.7.6.-3.7.7.4...........................................................
Mailing Address: 1 9. ..Gx.��tasbaxo- btaR�l.11ilLRnatl..................................... S".QmX tm p..NG.................................................. 2.7.3.4.9.............
FacilityContact: AaYad,.Undky................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative:D.aY.i!d.aaGtdjey............................................................................ Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:David...................................... Lindley....................... .. Operator Certification Number:213,2�.............................
Location of Farm:
NC87 south of Graham 13 miles to SR 1005(E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road)turn right. 1 1/2 miles on left. 1st house past
Spring Church.
❑Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 • 53 54 s. Longitude 79 ' 19 50
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer I IN Dairy 225 160
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer I 1 10Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 225
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 315,0Q0
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
E
olding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges R Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made`? ❑ Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed.did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection R Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ®Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Wasle.P.and..... ................................... ................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(inches): 36
05103101 Continued
7 C j a 0 &7' �

Facility Number: 01-12 Date of Inspection 8/20/2001 Printed on: 8/20/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
& Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
8, Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
IL Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Fescue(Hay) Soybeans Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ®No
t6. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required-Records &_Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
`Comment�(Tr±e'ofe—�rvfl—iof­ion quest #.): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other commenUse dra.vf facility to 6etter explain situaEions (useaddittonal pages as necessaryE) ®Field Copy ®Final Notes `
3: Operator has dug diversion ditch to send silage leachate to pasture to disperse.
Add approx. 12 inches to top of marker for freeboard recording.
E
wer/Inspector Name iMelissa Rosebrocwer/Inspector Signatu : Date: 1)
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 01_12 D& Inspection 8/20/2001 . Printed on: 8/20/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads, building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
05103101

�, '-� ,�" �� � �� ;r�.' •�.on of W atY. {�a6ty�'s' "`r� »n �w ���: �•�- �``°��"F �,�' �"�..s�'��� �"�d!^
� � � x � rt Utvrsroxt of�oi1 and Water Ca�tservatign
_ OtIICP.AgE1lC][ ': s
�.n
m�s
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit WRoutine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ©Denied Aocess
Facility Number Dale of Visit: b Time: U�
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted A Cert'i.}6]ed 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: �j,)d ....j. �i Z rN -, Q m.. County: A IQ MIJ ............ .......................
.� .... F....r. ........................
Owner Name: .....ieR�.:... 3®�-_....1-I Irld � ...... Phone No: . . ..�: ' ,3.�. 1..5r.........�..:.
Facility Contact: ... �v.I r .....L�. . . .. ... ................Title: ............................................................ Phone No: ............ ......................
MailingAddress: ... ........1..r......lP.�e �.f�.lQr .........`- r. ..... 'f.!. .........f' .......�..� .. �? .... r[ ........
OnsiteRepresentative: .r � ......4rtn . . ....................................................... Integrator:........ `� ......
....................�..
....................................•.-.•.., . ... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
�- 4o ash -Frbm . To-VP- tijc y 27 !�5I, I^Q6- I
l 4 Turn ri . --T s 1 Ug M• 6 ow L) rl
❑Swine ❑Poultry Cattle ❑Horse Latitude ®•®° �� Longitude •
Design, Current Design. . Curient Desegn Cvrireaat
Swute Ca aci ` Population Poultry , Ca acit . o ulation' " Cattle Ca iaci Po ">itlation
❑Wean to Feeder 10 Layer Dairy a
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity a��
❑Gilts'
El Total SSLW s
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area . ❑Spray Field
Holding Ponds]Solid Traps- ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑Yes )q No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ,�No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes N0
Waste Collection &Treatment !!��
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? x Spillway ❑Yes x No
,, l �Sy.4s~trrulf: .
ctture Stru ure Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: U� 5. .. ,"L....( G ...... ..........I........................ ... ..... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): 3 t
5/00 Continued on back

FaeiGty'Number: OF 1121 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes kNo
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ,�'No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes Nfgo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑Yes kNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes WNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes )WNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes 'kNo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receivIng crops differ w h thos designated irUhe Certified#1imal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑Yes X No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes P No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes
No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes X No
Re aired Records &Documents )�No
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard,waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes XNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ONo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ro
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yeso
Rio yioiatioiis:or•&flci6ndc $ ry r6 hated d(Wing{his'vtsit!•Yoo 1 ifl -i-&Ki6 do fufta. .
•corres ondenCe:t3batit this visit:•• •
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations'oi•,any other comments,
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary)'
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu Date: 5100

Facility Number: O — / of Inspection .
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes X No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes XNo
roads,building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) []Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? -9Yes B No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ltb
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
a .
1
5/00

w ision
of W5ter Quality
ision.ofSor4 and Water Conservation
401ther Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
eason tar Visit %routine O Complaint O Follow up O F-nergency Notification O Other Q Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 3l7/21101 Time: 9:00 Printed on: 8/17/2001
O1 12
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered pate Last Operated or Above Thresh ld: .........................
Farm Name: Undkey..Aairy..ktxc,.k'arm.......................................................................... County: Alamme......................................... WSRQ........
Ov►ser Nye: J),a ndIty Pli llx r- 4�r
Mailing Address: �5.9...lr..G.re�ta baxo-CiaaRel.hill.i3nad..................................... S.4aW..CAMP..N.0...................._......--.................... Z.7.3.42...------....
�aei�tr iri■ewt To __ room lac
Onsite Representative:DAYitl.Uixdley............................................................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:t?arid...................................... Li,Haley......................................... Operator Certification Number:21,3Z2............................,
Location of Farm:
CST south of Graham 13 miles to SR I005(E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road)turn right. I 1/2 miles on Ieft_ Ist house past A.
Spring Church.
aSwine aPoultry XCattle aHorse Latitude 35 • 53 59 Lougitatia 79 • 19 50
DesigEi Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder r Layer Dairy 22S t fi8
Feeder to Finish Non-Layer Non-Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 225
Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 315,000
Number of Lagoons Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps. 1 No Liquid Waste Management System
DiiscbarM&Stream Impacts
L Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? aYes ENO
Discharge originated at: CTLagoon CTSpray Field QOther
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed.did it reach Water of the State?(If yes,notify DWQ) aye allo
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does dikharge bypass a lagoon system'!(If yes.notify DWQ) ayes LINO
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes CffNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection R Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(frt:eboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway 0Yes 12No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Saucture 6
Identifier: ................................... ..................................
Freeboard(inches): 42
05103101 Continued

Flcility Number: 01-12 . Date of Inspection 3/7/2001 • Printed on: 8/17/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, Q Yes allo
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
mediate public health or environmental threat,Hoag DW4>)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Q Yes Off No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes C9 No
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Q Yes RNo
It. Is there evidence of over application? Q Excessive Ponding- Q PAN Q Hydraulic Overload []Yes JVNo
12. Crop type Corn,Soybeans,Wheat Fescue(Graze) Fescue(Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAW1tRP')? (3Yes &No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes S No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? Q Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? Q Yes CKNo
Ib. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? [3Yes Ito
17. Fai7 to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit or other Permit readily available? QYes WNo
18- Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) QYes ff No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ief irrigation,e freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) r7Yes &No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? QYes MNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge,freeboard problems,over application) Q Yes C§No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewCnspection with on-site representative? Oyes 99No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes Z No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to question r�#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendatiions or any other
Use draw�ngof facility�to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary)
®Field Copy ®Final Notes
a .♦ L� "r::
pr 8.Stocktrail just below the barn could use scraping and possibly add more stone.
13. WUP needs amending to add soybeans to Field#6,'tract 2853.
acility and records look good overall.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Focky Durham -�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05/03101 Continued

Irasility Number: 0712 1) f Inspection 3/7/2001 Printed on: 8/17/2001
Odes
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes Q No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, Q Yes No
roads, building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate corer? ❑Yes Rio
32. W the flush tanks lack a submerged fig pipe or a permanentltemporary corer? Q Yes 0 No
•
05103101

Y of Water Quality
INvision
vision of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit ©Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denie=Access
Facility Number 01 12 Date of Visit: SlZS/2000 Time: 10l5 Printed on- 8/25/2000
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold
®Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....••............
Farm Name: Undkx.l?airyArke...Farm....................... .. County: .. W.SRQ........
OwnerName: W.,..IQe.................................... Ljfxdjcy....................................................... Phone No: 3.3.lis3.7.fi- 7..7.4...........................................................
Facility Contact: VaY lds.URdu................................................Title: ................................................................ Phone No: Um Ad..336-376-993.6........
Mailing Address: 31 9. ..Gr��msbaxo-Ckxa�el.A i11.�tQad..................................... Set—QWX0.a P_NC.................................................. ;73.49.............
Onsite Representative:I27.Y.id.Lifidlogy.................... ..... .. .. ....... lntegrator:......................................................................................
.......... .... ............. ...........
Certified Operator:JDAY..ISM.A................................. UndkY............................................. Operator Certification Number;2.X322.............................
Location of Farm:
rC87 south of Graham 13 miles to SR 1005(E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road)turn right. 1 1/2 miles on left. 1st house past I
pring Church.
❑Swine ❑ Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude Longitude 79 • 19 50 . "
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 225 �_170
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 225
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 315,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray field Ares
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the.State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ®Spillway ❑Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Waste..ond...... ................................:.... ...........:....................... ..................................... .................................... ....:..........................
......
Freeboard(inches): 54
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: 01-12 Date of Inspection S/25/2000 Printed on: 8/25/2000 '•
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/tre , severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ®Yes ❑No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage&Grain) Soybeans Small Grain(Wheat,Barley, Tropical corn
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑Yes ®No
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes IN No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19, Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes IN No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
No-violati6ris:or:defieWncies•were;noted ii0009-this;vigit.•:You;wili r&OV4e i1611 role).
corres0 oridehC'e:abouf this:visit.': : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : . : : : : : : : : : : : : :
corn ments(refer to"questiow#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
8. Small amount of silage runoff from farthest trench. Is not getting to the creek. David will put out,hay/straw to prevent further runoff.
Check next visit.
B. Field#6 of tract 2853 is in soybeans but not in WUP.
j
Reviewer/Inspector Name Melis osebrock
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: g 5100

Facility Number: 01-12 I0of Inspection 8/25/2000 e Printed on: 8/25/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? []Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure,and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes ❑No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
w
5100

.6ivision of Water Quality
irrision of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date or visit: I mc: Printed un: 7/21/2000
Facility Number
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted y
Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
Farm Name: ........L.t..Y. j.. ...%b.a1..r.. T n L �� County: .....i ...�. .,r nc� o,,....... ..
1 .........I..................... .. .......... �]
ZT-
-3 7
Owner Name: ....... O'er,..... .. `f.�..� Phone No: .. .....................................t7 7..�.. .................
1 Phone N
Facility Contact: .A.......��{�1�.}, ............."Ittle: ................................................................ �:. �:.-3....�n.`-1..........
Mailing Address: . s ..l....... .......5.17.1� �j�... '!. ......f- ..1........AIL-1Fq.......I..............I.- -.........................
OnsiteRepresentative:iftha........... 1.. .. ... ................................ integrator:......................................................... ........................
........ �1 3 a
Certified Operator:., ,l ,,.,,.,, ,,.,,.,,,, ,1� �, Operator Certification Number
Location of Farm:
❑Swine ❑Poultry jCattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ' Longitude • EM4 E5:0«
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder JE3 Layer I JUDairy
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer I I JE1 Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity r
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW `j
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ -ag"on Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impact~
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes N0
Discharte originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. if disc harge is observed, vas the conveyance;man-rnadc'? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge it observed,did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. if dischar�ze is observed, what is the estilllatcd flaw in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system'?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? spillway ❑Yes Zto
SIRIGLure I Su-ucturc 2 Structure ( Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 L
Identifier: ..- ....
Freehoard (inches):
5100 Continued on hack
f

•Facility Number: — Date of Inspection a2� • Printer{ on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the lSTgrity of any of the structures observed'?(ie/trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ,1
closure plan? ❑ Yes `f� No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes )<No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? XYes [:] No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes �No
Waste Appliuition
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
11, Is there evidence of over application'? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
C,OE
12. Crop type A,�--�. r'Q S_S 0- f�_ nrlh rYrl l , t 1 I I Lila' 11
13. Do the receiving crops differ wi those designated i th'_e Certified An ial Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)'? ❑ Yes ANo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes jNo
o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yeso
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'? ❑ Yeso
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'? ❑ Yeso
Retmired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &General Permit readily available'? ❑ Yes *o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists, design, maps,etc.) V V/ ❑ Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative'? ❑Yes ��o.
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes VN
o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP'? ElYeso
�:�'Va yiolati6iis or.deficiencies were hated dtWi ig t'his:visit:•Y.Oi.}will-receive i further:-.•.-
icorres ondeitce:abi7tit:this:visit : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary):
� • Shrl a.�,1
�S � exee ' ' co l ' au`� s�-ray-1�hay
I�" • ���ld d� � aS53 -�s lVA bud- k)Od,l
Reviewer/Inspector Name ` iq
f—
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date: 5100

P cility Number: — of fuspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues_
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or la�go-oonn fail to discharge aVor h�elow
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? I T-
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes No
roads,building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑Yes [ N0
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
D1�I 1 Taaoo
32. Do the Bush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Adgitional Comments and/orDrawings:
NJO
Sol 50 L(ple 5
5100

Q&viston-of Water Qtea[tty �. . . ,
r�sion''of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit. 4l7I2000 Time: � Printed on: 8/24/2000
O1 12
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
Farm Name: Ljndley.JMryit ..Farm................. County: AhumAtirm......................................... WSA ........
......................................Owner Name: W.j.Re..................................... Ljix dlcy....................................................... Phone No: 33.6::3.76.73.77.4.....................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title: .....................................................--.. ..--- Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: 31 . .. 'r�tR�ta�b��ra- kt�Re�.i�i11.�iQas�..................................... SetoW.Katnp..XC................................................. 2.7.3.49.............
Onsite Representative:MAIJUndiltty, ,. Integrator: ................................................................................
Certified Operator:JDAY.MA................................. Uadley.............................................. Operator Certification Number:Z13.22.............................
Location of Farm:
87 south of Graham 13 miles to SR 1005 turn right. 1 1/2 miles on left. 1st past Spring Church. A.
❑Swine ❑ Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 • 54 00 " Longitude 79 • 19 ' 45 '�
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ® Dairy 1 225 1 182
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer El Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder I0 Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 225
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 315,000
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present I❑Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps I ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
Identifier: .................:.................. ..................................... .................................... ..................................... ...................................:. ..................................
:..
Freeboard(inches): 72
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: 01-12 Date of inspection Printed on: 8�24/2000
4/7/2000 ;•,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the i grity of any of the structures observed?(iel trievere erosion, ❑ Yes % No
seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Fescue(Graze) Timothy,Orchard, &Rye Corn (Silage&.Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ®No
Required Records& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design,maps,etc.) ❑Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(iel irrigation,freeboard, waste analysis&soil sample reports) ❑Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes IN No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes .®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge,freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
No viol'atior. . deficiencies were noted during this:visit. :You:rvill receive no further.:
correso ondence.abouf this:visit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : . : : . . . : : .
Com;'m n(refer t�'o�`qu'�est�iron,#): Explain a�ny�YES•answers and/or any r�e�co�m men#d�a+tF'tons or any`other,�contss�4��
Use drawings,of,fac�hty4to bettin stuat�o, �(u eaddt al3pages as eecessary). V
19 Need to start keeping weekly levels on lagoon per general permit.
Has not gotten back soil sample.
Records look good.
Reviewer/Inspector Name lRocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

--r
I.Fdciffty Number: 01-12 D—of Inspection 4/7/2000 Printed on: 8/24/2000
Odd ,r Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [:] Yes ❑No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.residue on neighboring vegetation,asphalt, ❑Yes ®No
roads, building structure,and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e.broken fan belts,missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑Yes ❑No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
-J I
5100

Division of+ 1 and Mater Conser -vation Operatio n IRe
y~0 Division o and Water Conservation-Compliance I tion
J'..
Division of at er Quality-Compliance Inspection ?: g
EelOther A gene -O eration Review
_x
". .
g Y P
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 01 12 Date of Inspection 5/27/99
Time of Inspection 1000 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered JE3 Not O erationa! Date Last Operated:
FarmName: .......................................................................... County: Alaw;Ance......................................... WS.RQ........
OwnerName: W-JQe..................................... l..i Afty................---..................................... Phone No: 33.6_37.647.74...........................................................
Facility Contact: ftwd l.Un dba................................................Title: QrC......................................................... Phone No: 33.6 37f.Q93f........................
Mailing Address: 3tSQ. .. x �asba�ro-. bta�rel.11iAl.ltsA.......................................... S:nog•..CAMP.-K.................................................. 273.49.............
OnsiteRepresentative:D Y.W.Undley..................... .. .............................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:Da.Y.id.t1 Pa.-f.i.d.A................................. Und u............................................. Operator Certification Number:Z1322.............................
Location of Farm:
...........................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
.7.sQ.ultlx.Qt�rx�haRn..lJ.nails.tti.,S .1QU ..taxta.K.....t,.d.XIZ: il�s:n xAiAuxclx,................................................................
Latitude 35 • 54 00 &6 Longitude =0
19 , DE111
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ®Dairy 160 180
❑Feeder to Finish JE1 Non-Layer ❑Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder 10 Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity F 160
❑Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW 224,000
E
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Areaolding Ponds/Solid Traps 1 ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d- Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches) ...............4$............... .................................... ................................... .................................... .......................
..-......... ....................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?(ie/trees,severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage,etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

1
r, Facility Number: 01-12 of Inspection 5127/99
6. Are there structures on-site which are 01operly addressed and/or managed through a ste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Excessive Ponding ❑PAN ❑Yes ®No
12. Crop type Sudex (Silage) Fescue(Hay) Fescue(Graze) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ❑ Yes ®No
b)Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes ®No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ®No
I& Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP,checklists,design, maps,etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation,freeboard, waste analysis& soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ®No
®:NO violations:or:deficiencies Wi 1,fe'nbted d i ihig-this:visit.-:You:Will r&OV0, n6•fti.rther
. . . . . . . .
or:resPatideilce:about this.visit. : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : . . .
jUL
� � -:- -
to qMtobeti
) �Ezplama�na
dlor anyrecommendateonsor any other commentsocilier explain sitional pages•as�:_.
13 Rye and soybean have been added to WUP as requested in last operational review.
17 In process of applying for G.P. The additional of high water mark is suggested. Record keeping was neat and orderly
Remove 1 or 2 trees from dam area.
Please review lower points of the sheltered area for additional guttering and managment practices for exclusion of stormwater.
DESIGN CAPACITY HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO 225 PER THE CAWMP ON SITE.
E
er/Inspector Name Ron Linville Hamid Rafiee
er/Inspector Signature: Date:

- D:Division o andtWater'Conservation''Operation dke
D.D>t boo of oil and Water Conservation-Compliance Inspection
i;rision oa f Wter Quality-Gomp[iance Inspection . . �.•� x `�
Othei Agency-:Operation Review :
outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Z� Date of Inspection S17
Time of Inspeclion 24 hr.(hh:mm)
Permitted C94_ertilied E3 Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .....L �.. .. �..y�. � ..e................................. County: ...... tC+- ....... .......................
Owner Name: ...1/ll.�...... C?..�fL.t........... ..... .L...ta, ................................ Phone No: 3.r��..f... .. .f�.....-'.... . ... - .....
Facility Contact: ..s�Q�L1.a.. ........ � ........Title: ......... ................ Phone No: 3�a 7 ..'". .. .+�
Tailing Address: ...�.a.�.s '........., F... �J Q .... ........ .........5/t.t.�eJ.... .......-. .... a..7.. .rr�..... ......... ... .
Onsite Representative: ..... .Q: �./ ...... Integrator:...................../...�1,.. ...... .....................
Certified Operator:............�.Qe.- .cP.......• „•. ..... Operator Certification Number:...al
Location of Farm:
i
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... T j
Latitude °�� C Longitude =•
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Poultry Cattlep Capacity .Population
❑Wean to Feeder 10 Layer atry S'
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer LEI Non-Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
El Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts
❑Boars 'Total SSLW
16
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ][].Spray Field Area
HoldingPoiids/Solid Traps ❑No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes �(o
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑Yes ❑No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Water of the State?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
C. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 531<0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes B-N101,
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Spillway ❑Yes ❑No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ................ ................................. .........................I.........I ................................... ................................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes [5*1�0
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: O-1 — ( L Oc
of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or �
closure plan'? El ^
Yes l�o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 2.<o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9^0
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes HK
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑Yes To
1 1. Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑Yes F&4-f,4o
12. Crop type A. e, zz '. '...
13. Do the receiving crops iffer with those designated in the&rtified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ Yes r o0
14. a)Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Eh o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 93'1Go
c)This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes Flo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 2090
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes [RNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage&General Permit readily available? ❑Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/WUP, checklists,design, maps, etc.) ❑Yes
19, Does record keeping need improvement?(ie/irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑Yes R'No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes 2 No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes [TIIo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems,over application) ❑ Yes E No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes !moo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes goo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes -No
Nb-viglati6 is'ot-deficiencies mere h6fed•during Ois;visit:•Y:OO WiII•receive iio;further'•;-'
corres� orideizce'about:this visit =' '
Comments(refer to question#) : EXplahf any YES answers-and/or,any recommendations or.any other,eornmerits:
-Use-drawing's of facility to.better explain situations (use addrtional'pages as necessaiy)
ion
J 3 i2 y . f j G .t✓ fjcz.«c C c eQ .,�/l_ .{� 4V Lj 0 c:.j
Cy f G-�( ,
o-,d��rl � 4,,.,o e—. � °" Z�7'e e S �Yc.n e�c1w•
P I V Jr
!'?1 1� it ►c- eu C,
p �- f
Reviewer/Tns ector Name `
n
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

Facility dumber: Q - r of Inspection ..2�
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [:] Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 931No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s)noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters,etc.) ❑Yes E)No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 9-Ko'
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
a.
7
3/23/99

Akk
� zc:3 DryrSrgirtof Si C OmpltvzartRceLv>spwec
- � -Division ofSteoil and Water ConserYattou Co
u
r .`r
,��'DtvtSrpn cpf'Water�Qualtty_Compliance Impechonkr�rL; F� � ��r' „fl �,�
pl,Other-Agency Operation Review 2�, a � aA
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-tip of D% )inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection Ile
Time of Inspection 24 hr.(hh:mm)
13 Registered [3 Certified ©Applied for Permit [3 Permitted []Not Operational I Date Last Operated: .-
Farm Name: County
G
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No: ................................... :�% Dept:of EH N A
FacilityContact Title .... Phone No: NOV — 3 1998
.....................................
Winston-S l. lit
Mailing Address: ................................... `..........r.............................................. ................................................... ............................: ............
..............
Regional Office'
Onsite Rc re4entative:... �_.�.. ................. f..G..+�J,.�;. ........_.............. Integrator:.---........... ..�p ....................................... .............................
Certified Operator:.................................................. ............................................................. Operator Certification Number..........................................
Location of Farm:
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude �' ��� Longitude �• �� �"
t Design Current ', Design ;Current Design '£ Currrent
Swine f Ca pacity;Population uPoultry „ Capacity,-P.opulatiori Cattle Capacity Populattan
IT ❑Wean to Feeder ::[] Laver Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish '' ❑Non-Layer Nan Dairy
s
❑ Farrow to Wean g
❑ ❑
Farrow to Feeder Other ; v
❑ Farrow to Finish `
A rTotal Design Capacity,
Gilts
❑ Boars . Total`SSCW
kw
E
❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area D
� 3
r - ❑No Liquid Waste Management System {
rAM .
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes A!YNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes W(No
Discharge ori,inated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes 4 No
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes PNo
c. If discharge is obsenved, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? ,,(
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes YJ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes &N0
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes �No
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑Yes VrNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 0 Yes No

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoon=,or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes ONO
Structures (Lapoons.Holdini! Ponds.Flush Pits,etc.)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Yes IN-0
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(fr)= ...... 1..................... ................................... .................................. .................................... .................................... .......................... ........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes LQ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of anv of the structures observed., ❑ Yes /O No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do an-of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? [ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes�No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
� r .
15. Crop type ... �t � }L-.`?,....-..... i.! . ...��'(j-�i�4h1..../.....� J......................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑Yes 0'1�o
17, Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ONo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes J�No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes ;No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes No
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes [3'No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes gNo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes VfNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ENo
[3 No.violatio s-or. defidencie's4e're itoted,during this:visit.,You4ill receive:no-further_:
: ebrrespondenee about this.visit.•;-:.:,: : : : : . . : :
Ctmmeats'(refer to questton#) Ixplain-any�v YES4artsw�ers an�lor a�iy� mmf�rtda#toris'or�anp„oEher'coaunents ��:� ` Z�`
;U�diraw�rtgs of fec><hty w Better explaul;sttuado (use addthonal pages asiecessarv} � � � �
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name r, g ��WW
,° i�3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date: I

_. ..
v. , . ❑ DSWC Ant al Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of MN"Q inspection 0 Follow-tip of DSkVC: review 0 Other
Facility Number ©ate of Inspection
Time of Inspection [2� 24 hr.(hh:mm)
19 Registered 1p Certified ©Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ..... . . 41.j . .1.�vc- .....64.k�....... CountF':....11l M �! cQ...................... .......................
Owner Name: 73.21y,
cJp.2............. ..N.. .� ................................................. Phone N`o: g/Q 7.�o...r ....................
Facility Contact: ...................................... ..Title: ... Phone No:
/- nnII q
Mailing Address: ..... ..ft��J.... ......Ul�{Pnr.S aA .. ..I.fiGyGej. '.1 ..........:.J1�'1.W....�/ t/°..../V ........... .. ��I...
Onsite Representative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:...............................
Certified Operator;........Qga sl,..Gt Operator Certification Nnmher: *..�.. .. Z
Location of Farm:
ak�...... ..w .... ... ... (..6. "�." " � .. . :......�........._.... .�.:..� ....,r�..o ..... .. . .........:................
.............................. --- -- --... -----............._..._................ ................................._.............._........._..........................
Latitude 3 •F324 Longitude �• ®� ��
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑ Dairy A Op
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non-Layer ❑,Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons/Holding Ponds l! J ❑Subsurface Drains Present 1101,agoonArea 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes z o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes EK
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 5346
b. li'dischar-c is observed,dill it reach Surface Water? (11 yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑No
c. If dischar-e is observed, what is the estimated flow in al/ntin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes Q,AiK'
3. is there evidence of past dischar.-,e froth any part of the operation? ❑Yes L1K
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes
5. Does any part of the waste managetttent system (other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑Yes 9<o
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance%with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes (Q�.LN<
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes Q>l
7/25/97 Continued on back 'U t"

Facility~'umber:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ,'o
Structures(1,agoons,11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes , o
Structure fI Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier- m/....�4,e4............................... .................................... .................................. .................................. ........
Freeboardft / ............... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes ia<o
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑Yes 'o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes , o
Waste:lnnlieatinn
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes 0, b
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering, waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop type /¢ct j..... :4 e1............................... ...........................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑Yes [moo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes 01XV
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes O o
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes t1J-t'�o
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative'? ❑Yes EWN
.22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes , o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste ,Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes o
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes i o
� �i
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑Yes Irk. o
0 No.violations or. deltcieneie's were-noted during this.visit. You.will receive no further
correspondence a4out this.visit: .
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any.YES answers,and/or any recommendations or.any,_other�comments
Useydra�ings.of facility to better explain situations.(use additional pages as necessary)
7/25/97
Mo
Reviewer/Inspector,1`ame '
w _
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r Date: O
r J

p DSWC AnidWFeedlot Operation Review
N w ®DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
out me p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection 6/27/97
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
ota ime-(in fraction ot hours
Farm Status: ®Registered la Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min))Spent on Review 2.0
p Certified p Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
p Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Lindley Dairy Inc. Farm County: Alamance..........................................WSRO........
OwnerName: W...Jae.................................... Liudky....................................................... Phone No: 3.76-3774...................................................................
Facility Contact: Daviid..Undley.................................................Title: Jaimt.oryaer...................................... Phone No: 9.1.07,37.6r,3174.......................
MailingAddress: ........................................... Sno.w..Camp...NC.................................................. Z73.4.9..............
Onsite Representative: Daiid.LiniJ[ty,.Aon.uf..owner..J.ne..Liudhey..................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Opera tor:.Carr1(on.B_............................ Bare[oat.......................................... Operator Certification Number:17.795.............................
Location of Farm:
so.ult .o .- ra ant.. .mx es.to.. .. . ...a:.uz�n,xa li.::..::......:m..cs:nn:. .t:::..st:past:...frlm :......urc...::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :................................................
:ii....
'I
Latitude 0 a®' ®" Longitude ®• ®L 4�
Type of Operation Design Current Design Current. Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder p ayer JIM Dairy 223
p Feeder to Finish 1[3 Non-Layer lo on- airy
p arrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder Total Design Capacity 22
p Farrow to Finish Total SSLW 3 1!,
13 Other
Number of Lagoons/Holding Ponds 010 Subsurface rains resent ❑ agoon rea ❑ pray ie c rea
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? [] Yes ®No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water?(If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? [] Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds)require p Yes 10 No
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97

Facility Number: 01_12
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? [] Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ®No
Structures(Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? p Yes ®No
Freeboard(ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5.0
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes M No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes N No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? [] Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......................F.esc�ue......---.....................C(1rn.kSilage..&.0rain.)............................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? [] Yes ®No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes ®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? p Yes ® No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes ® No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? Cj Yes ®No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? p Yes M No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes p No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? p Yes ®No
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.:
;Use dra►vings of:facility:ao better explain°s tuatiti]ns.(use additional gages as necessary)
5. Lagoon top needs mowing.
** David Lindley,Certified Operator no. 21322 contacted prior to visit on 6-24-97
J
Reviewer/Inspector Name Jitn J611 ton.
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:

ace Ry Number: 01-12 D.Of Inspection ® S
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
4/30/97

( i
':� 9 # y- � C. 'h8� 5� A
❑DSWC� malFeedlot�Operatlon£Rev><e �'
�''��• ���y"- �DW�Q�An><mal Fee lot Operatlon�Slte Inspectlon � � � ,�� �Y ��
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DW2 ins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number p / Date of Inspection N
Time of Inspection Ei � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: "w e d ❑Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑Certified ❑Permitted or Inspection includes travel and processing)
❑Not Operational Date Last Operated: .............. ..._....._..............._...... .._...... ..._.............................
Farm Name: —4 e_ ��✓l�f.... 12.�-4 County
�r��.. _... ..... . ... _ ........ . .........11t1
Land Owner Name: ... _.�11.7 ... M... yFt��.�.................. .. Phone No: 9/D ��
Facility Canctact: .......................................................... . Title: .... Phone No:
Iailing Address:. ..... _ . .... & r . � . �7 � /��
---............... •--
Onsite Representative: .......,......._......_.................. ..... Integrator:
Certified Operator: Vl..ri�....... ....... N�/e `� p 1 3�...�._.... _...._..... O erator Cert�ficahao Number: .............._z..?--
Location of Farm:
5...4ff.?;0'
................................ar.r.►1_......7A............................................................................................ ........................................................................................
�y
Latitude Longitude �• /� E, If�ivc�{ j,t
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
,. -.,; ces. x � ��- o- ^mom.. e'. r iJr�l G" i'
� ' Design rLrrent � _ Design [Z << r gn Current
$w�ne�� � " .. ''Poultry ! p� x :
s, T Ca aci Po ulattoi y,., :. �Ca ac�tv: F ��� :citi� P0 u[ahon�
❑We to Feeder d❑ Layer -----4 I NAJU�`'`
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non Layer Wit`'
Farrow to Wean � r� :>.
Farrow to Feeder r #Total Design Capacity= . ;
MH Farrow to Finish � ' � � t
_ � w tal SSLY�
«ff 6
%�
ner
` fumb r of Lagoons!"Ho[dingPonds ❑Subsurface Drains Present
WPM
wR ❑L �❑Spray:Field Area,. Lagoon Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ErlNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes LSO
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes U-No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water`?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes EJ-xo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes EPro
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes RI
s oo
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require El Yes ►I-No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

Facility Number:
6. Is facility not in compliance with anlicable setback criteria in effect at the time*Sign? Oyes do
:- -
7 Did the facility fall to have a certified operator in responsible charge? [] Yes �10
8.7Are there'lagoons orstorage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ELN6'
5teictures�l,s�a9narsd/or Holding Porid
9.:Is storage capacity(feeboazd plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [moo
Freeboard(ft): .,- ;Structture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
• '•5 ... ....-.-.-. .-........—............... ....._�-......_ ....�......._............. .........._...._...... ........
-.................-
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes ~
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes ❑
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes M-0
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes GKO
Wastr,Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑yes
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......................................................------...------...... .............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑ Yes l_To
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes 0-1
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 2No
I9. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes ,�o-
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes L ilo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑Yes 9N
F r_Certified Facilities Onlv_
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes V,No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No
^tea ,s x
Comments(refer toquestn# Explain any YEans veers and/orany re commendations or anyothecamments .,;
;Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary)
:f;,. # ':.,`�
. a
Reviewer/InspectorName � f* �R , g a:. .: �:. ^r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc; Division of Water Quality, Water Quality ection, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Facitity Number 'd .-. Z. tion:
to of Inspec r
----- -
. a�✓t",� xe'za`t 9£, '� -�:t .� a ,_ 4",2' - - � -,� -.F.3 =� off{-a�::..>:.�.
�YAd�itional
. �.y ..nr /7-.? 4
4/30/97

�
r ❑ DSWCnal Feedlot Operation Revue
4 �
..s x �
,'j3DWQ-Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection Y �
Routine O Complaint O Follow-ue of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: `-'"mastered ❑Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑Certified ❑Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑Not Operational Date Last Operated: ......W. -....................................................._......................_....
_ .... . .....
Farm Name: .... %� 1 . ....._..... �r f.... County:........... .... .. .
Land Owner .... .... ........ . .............................. Phone No:...2_1 .........3.PlP.~ ._.. .5 .. .....__..
Facility Conctact: .................................................................................. Title: .. Phone No:
flailing Address:.............. . ....... IL
.!!x .... ........ ... .... . ..73.��.1...
Onsite Representative: ..... ............................................._.............................. Integrator:
Certified Operator: ................P.Z.V),k,........ ........ .................. Operator Certification Number:�;I;3••••,,,,••Z•.„••
Location of Farm:
. . x...dw.( ..• ....FePem.. -..: . ...• .Q- a..n
..............
. ..... cx...►C....At....................................._........................................................................................................ ........ ....................................K
Latitude Longitude
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
;m = ,Destgn Current - DesignCurrent :� r Destgn Current
Swine � w n r
ace 1'o ulatibn Poultry Ca acity Po alafton CatEle:, Ca"aci Po ulation
a ❑Wean to Feeder F ❑ La er ❑Da'
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑Nan-La er ❑Non Dat
El Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder Total Destgn Capac�#y [� E�
Farrow to FinishEl � ��.
e -..�.�...,,...�.�..�.�...
Other r
Number of Lagoons</ HoldtngPonds ❑Subsurface Drains Present
�. a s :r ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes L�No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes M1Vb-
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes KINii
b_ If discharge is observed,did it reach Surfacc:Water?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ado
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/inin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑Yes EJ-Mo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ,moo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes Imo
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ❑Yes o
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

FaciUty Number: -- ...L.........Y.-...... �
6. Is facility not in compliance with am icable setback criteria in effect at the time Asign? ❑ Yes 9KO/'
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes E��O
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes
Structures (Lagoons and/o"Jolding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Yes ©-No—
Freeboard(ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
_�rl
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes E*rN _
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes EJ-rva
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes 8 Ala
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the%situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes 9-1I
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....... Q! .............................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops /differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes ErNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes Plloo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes LrJ"No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes IM'Iqo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes S-No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes
For Certified_Facilities,_, my /V/rlr
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑Yes allo
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes 29 No
Comments(refer to question#) Explain any YES answers and/of any recommendations'or:ariy other comments:x
U —
se drawings,of facility to better expia�n sittiations. (use additional pages as necessary) ; H , ,
o
Reviewer/Inspector Name !%t . . ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature- Date: (� --
cc: Division of Water Quality, ester Quality ection, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

' Facilihv Number: c(if Inspection:
Additional Comments and/or Drawings':.'
4/30197

"TER aJRLITY SECTION TO WSRO P.02/02
JiJL-14-1995 15�34 FROM DEM .
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No./�f
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANU AL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS STTE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:_ ,_ G' , 1995
Time: r
Farm Nam00wner: %Y
Marking Address: 3.S-/9
cbmatr
Integrator. _ Phone:
On Site Representative: . _il�� ,c�-� �/�c Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle ^L�
Design Capacity: 2 i Number of Animals on Site: LZ
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Crrrification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ,Sr �° 'o 0 Longitude: 22 Z2 ` `-" Elevation: __ .Fett
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot+25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot+7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: f fit. .Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o�y)Kas any erosion observed? Yes o�a
Is adequate land available for spray? y'or No Is the coves crop adequate Y No
CroP(s) being utilized• ti. _1✓ G -- Uz-- �_ 3 S�cz•c.��.�
Does the facility meet SCS minimum iethack criteria? 2&Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch,flushing system. or other
similar man-made devices? Yes c r No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
Wray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Y s or No
Additional Comments:
tnr N tore
cc:Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

41(
NIE d YAM
QF-
E JORD
cr TARY
NET
- _
%14
1233-51
-am u
Carolmo
371 1 WHITNEY-.
Ell RECREA: IQ(N4
"Li 10
vA asr ELI WH El;,STATIO
ti
1.
ACE J
1,
.wo CPO
12 fr
f23"p 71 HWL L
r"�AD No
OVF,"f
'VON
LL
7 1 As.
'
mp.
SyCOUNT p

OPERATION BFANCH - WO Fax:?19-715-60=,- Jul 24 'qc', 10:28 P. 03/18
Site fuuncdiaxc Attrntioto
Irac i7 Number:
SITE YISITA'17bN RECORD
DATF9: ? ` �`7 1995
Owner. /0- kxarm Narrtc:
County: f 1Allf
Agcnt Visiting Sitm `1'1 Phone:? ,7,•!
01acrator � _ ir` T Plana: 7 7 /
On Site Rrlsrmenuuiva'.__. Pbono:
NiysicaJ
Muiling hddtrss:_
Typc of Cfior Uva, SWISIC You!try— Cattle _ ✓ t;r�cr 1
n esl n Caperclty: --- s"� _ Numlaer of AnimuIt on Sitt:
J -1 � n _Type of of Inspccti=: amend -_ � ,serial
Circle Ycs or,'No
Does Lhe,a idnial Wnate.I.agar-n havt,ouf wiwnt fmcLa rd o: i Fvot f 25 24 stow event
(;.ppro cimntcly I Fool ;-t inc%C.I�` �,v or Nto Actual rr=brjasd:-:�—T',(d
For facilitfem WI(h mom tarn one lKuomi,p,c%sc address the alter lagmm' f'rceboasd under the
culruir.11l: S�CLlo4.
Wns any smpaV otlpscrveL-d f om tle-lvgoon(s)? Ym- or Co was ILcIZ croivn of az Ye3 004�7
7s xdcc;uato ldriri nv0abla for.mid appiiuuuiun7&c pr Na is the a2vtr crop
AdtSit:Utt�tf CointncaL-,;
Fax to(919)7I5-3559 s' cure of Agomt }
ATC rI t