010010_PERMITTING_20171231

' I TOP Of Dom Beva#on
Fmer�pert[y Reeboad Here(Dam Protection).Ttls Distance
Is About 16 Feet.
cj u1Y 1^2 j 01 Invert or Water
O,rerflv.Hera
-�- Ir pans warner WO Begin 5amp rt�e
;Sy_U. Z?i_ ! 6mtergency Overflow About Here.
NOTES - 12Irn&
1)This clawing shows the etdsting pond marker Inside the Trple W.F-ams. N:,V , r ►l''
stonnwoter pond. This pond stores atom-water and or" waste.
2)There we be times when a storm fils the pond above the start pulp
mark. The operator sfmotld take Irrnedote action to reduce the water level II Inches
below the start pump mark. Ths pole Is marked in 12 Inch ktarements above rs
the start purnp level so the farmer can tell how much water mist be removed f y��—'-- One 25 Year-24 Harr Storm Stored Here.
In order to return to a compksnoe level. h ��• The Operator Snug Try To Keep TFri Space Empty
- 1� .• To Store The Water From A Severe Storm TNrc tot,
3)The operator Can refer to time As-Wit written spertifK�aticrn package to see Depth Is L75 Feet. Given That TIO is A Stormwater
a graph Of The vo r e h h ttils { � St Pond tnrements Or Memuement were Ploced
deg pond The graph will help detemine y Above Start Pump level lutead Of Below The Start
opproArrtate volumes of various fill levels. 12 ketches Pur p Level
4)This pole was sat after the pond was conshucted and contained a coruiderdale
amo nt of water die to a storm It was Installed an the Vdde of the darn
12 her es
presume Treated 4's4'Pole 9e5
NOV-1 Rok l4ZLa Larval
Start UgAd Removal At/Or Before Here
Galvatzed Steel
Lap Screws
C,rada Inside Pond
At Post Placement
•Y;,.;� Allowable Wori to Storage Vohame. LkMd
.�.•.•'+: Deem Will Way In Me Zcne.Al Uq►ds Can Be
Removed Ram This Shaohre. This Total Distance
k T245 Feat*/
A-d-a.d P.I.Wtl,
Geode Inside Pand(Syrbdlcl I 24 In OF
Bottom Is Not level l
SHEET AS TWF 3.0 ..m
OMFU EMAL o STCF~TM STCRKE POD we T.
� m.s.
SUNCES HATM LEVM N XATu-�PaE .�•..
�rt•_It TFWkE M Fu.6 �..�•c
inet�,cw or+MO went'FMrr.woer scum
naara•r

r,r
6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION:
This form must be completed by the appropriate DWR regional office and included as a part of the
project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters(the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward) in
which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWR regional office.
Therefore,you are required, prior to submittal of the application package,to submit this form, with items 1 through 6
completed, to the appropriate Division of Water Resources Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor(see page 6 of 10). At a
minimum,you must include an 8.5" by 1 I" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the
application package.
6.1 Farm Name: Triple W Farms
6.2 Name&complete address of engineering firm: NIA
Telephone number:( ) -
6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: Marys Creek
6.4 County(ies)where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located: Alamance County
6.5 Map name and date: NC DWR ARCGIS Surface Water Classification Website
6.6 NC Professional's Seal(If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
TO: REGIONAL AQUIFER PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters: Marys Creek within the Cape Fear River Basin
Classification(as established by the Environmental Management Commission): WS-V NSW(August 10 2009
Proposed classification, if applicable: NIA
Signature of regional office personnel: Date: December 22, 2015
(All attachments must be signed)
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5

I �
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Animal Feeding Operations Permit Application Form
(THIS FORMMAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
State General Permit — New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name: Triple W Farm `
1.2 Print Land Owners name: Harold G. Woody �,FGE1�IFD[KDEUDWR
1.3 Mailing address: 3545 E Greensboro Chapel Hill Rd. lJ a � 2016
�i=e
City, State: Snow Camp NC Zip: 27349
Telephone number(include area code): ( 336)213 - 8644 Water Qualry Re Sect►on
i,011
1.4 Physical address: SAME operations
City, State: Zip:
Telephone number(include area code): ( ) -
1.5 County where facility is located: Alamance
1.6 Facility location (directions from nearest major highway,using SR numbers for state roads): Hwy 87 S of Graham NC turn
right onto Greensboro Chapel Hill Rd. go %z mile to farm on right
1.7 Farm Manager's name(if different from Land Owner): f !C
A* 1.8 Lessee's/Integrator's name(if applicable;circle which type is listed): Ma laZ-Virgima
l 9 Facility's original start-up date: 1968 Date(s)of facility expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility number: 010010
2.2 Operation Description:
Please enter the Design Capacity of the system. The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste
management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Tyne of Poultry No.of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑Feeder to Finish ❑ Non-Layer ❑ Beef Feeder
❑Farrow to Wean(#sow) ❑Turkey ❑ Beef Stocker Calf
❑Farrow to Feeder(#sow) ❑Turkey Poults ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Farrow to Finish(#sow) IR Dairy Heifer 200
❑ Wean to Finish(#sow) ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Gilts ®Milk Cow 400
NC Department of
❑ Boar/Stud Environmental Quality
Received A.
!� FEB 0 9 2016 -
...; Winston-Salem
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 4.: Regional Office --0, Page 1 of 5

. 2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application(excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system)- #Required Acreage(as listed in the CAWMP): 25
2.4 Number of lagoons: Total Capacity(cubic feet): Required Capacity(cubic feet):
Number of Storage Ponds: "O"'
g Total Capacity(cubic feet Required Capacity(cubic feet): AIA
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100'of any of the application fields? YES or NO (circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the waste management system? YES or NO (circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? YE or NO (circle one)
S-ra{v--U'c"Itk wI.L "%n I o,txaa '3 (t �o�.�►'J
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST:
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for State General Permit-
Animal Waste Operations;
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied and a county road map with the location of the ,f
facility indicated; �Lt�
3.3 Three copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a permit application for
animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not have been required at the time
the facility was certified but should be added to the CAI i3'MP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC-CPA-17 or equivalent
3.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons,if required
3.3.3 Documentation that proposed swine facilities meet the Swine Farm Siting Act,including a site map prepared by
a Registered Land Surveyor. The scale of this map shall not exceed I inch=400 feet. At a minimum,the site
map shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to occupied residences within 1500 feet,
schools,hospitals,churches,outdoor recreational facilities,national parks,state parks,historic properties, or
child care centers within 2500 feet,property boundaries within 500 feet,water supply wells within 500 feet.
The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries and perennial streams or rivers located within
75 feet of waste application areas.
3.3.4 Documentation showing that all adjoining property owners,all property owners who own property located
across a public road,street,or highway from the facility,the local health department,and the county manager
or chair of the county board of commissioners if there is no county manager,have been notified by certified
mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location.
3.3.5 A wetlands determination
3.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design
3.3.7 Proposed runoff control measures, if required
3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design
3.3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan(WUP)must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen(PAN)produced and
utilized by the facility
3.3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal field
3.3.11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field
3.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field
3.3.14 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
3.3.15 The required NRCS Standard specifications
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 3 of 5

3.3.16 Emergency Action Plan
3.3.17 Insect Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.18 Odor Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.20 Docuiuentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moritoria on Construction or
Expansion of Swine Farms, if the application is for a swine facility
3.3.21 A map showing the topography of the proposed facility location showing features
that affect facility design,the dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities,
the fields used for waste application,and areas where surface runoff is to be
controlled
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list,please include the additional components with your
submittal. (Composting,waste transfers,etc.)
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, / (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2),attest that
this application for f a,t T(Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete. ^ j
Signature ! 14 '6�L�� Date 1 "Z 7 —I b
�. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for {Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE,INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS UNIT
1636 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
S FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5

6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION:
eThis form must be completed by the appropriate DWR regional office and included as a part of the
project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters(the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward) in
which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWR regional office.
Therefore,you are required, prior to submittal of the application package,to submit this form, with items 1 through 6
completed,to the appropriate Division of Water Resources Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor(see page 6 of 10). At a
minimum,you must include an 8.5" by i 1"copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the
application package.
6.1 Farm Name: Triple W Farms
6.2 Name&complete address of engineering firm: N/A
Telephone number: ( )
6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: Maras Creek
6.4 County(ies)where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located: Alamance County
6.5 Map name and date: NC DWR ARCGIS Surface Water Classification Website
e6.6 NC Professional's Seal(If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
TO: REGIONAL AQUIFER PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters: Marys Creek within the Cape Fear River Basin
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission): WS-V,NSW(August 10,2009)
Proposed classification, if applicable: N/A
Signature of regional office personnel. Date: December 22, 2015
(All attachments must be signed)
•
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-N/E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5

Animal Waste Management ]Plan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
lExisting or New or Expanded (please circle one
General Information: Permit No:
i Name of Farm: Triple W Farm _ Facility No: _010010—PL--_1 D
Owner(s) Name: Harold G. Woody Phone No:336-213-8644
Mailing Address:3545 E Greensboro Chapel Hill Rd. Snow Camp,NC 27349
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: Alamance
Latitude and Longitude:_351v 54" 15' / _79'�_17"_60' Integrator: Ma 1 it mia
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): Hwy 87 South of Graham NC turn right onto Greensboro Chapel Hill
Rd. go %mile to farm on right.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. ofAnimals Type of Poultry No. ofAnimals Type of Dairy No. ofAnimals
o Wean to Feeder o Layer •Milking 400
o Farrow to Wean Type of Beef No. ofAnimals a Heifers 200
o Farrow to Feeder o Brood o Calves
o Farrow to Finish o Feeders
o Gilts o Stockers
o Boars Other Type ofLivestock: Number ofAnunals: 600
Expanding Operutitm Only
Previous Design Capacity: Additional Design Capacity: Total Design Ca ai: :
Acreage Available for Application: Required Acreage:250
Number of waste structures: _ Total Capacity:�, ��(;,�,g},acKC�nbic Feet(0)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or N (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the waste structures(please circle one or both as applicable)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I(we)understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I(we)know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage
system or construction of new facilities will require a permit application and a new certification to be submitted to the Division
of Water Resources (DWR) and permit approval received before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage system to surface waters of the state unless specifically allowed under a
permit from DWR and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of
pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by the USDA-Natural
Resources Conservation Service(MRCS). The approved plan will be fled at the farm and at the DWR Regional Office and the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD). I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a
technical specialist and submitted to the DWR Regional Office and local SWCD and required approvals received from DWR
prior to implementation. A change in farm ownership requires a permit application to be sent to DWR along with a new
certification(if the approved plan is changed).
Name of Land Owner: Harold G. Woody
Signature: LJ Date:
Name of Manager(if different from o vner):
Signature: Date:
AWC-September 18,2006 . 1

Technical Specialist Certification
LAs a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6H .0104, I certify that the animal waste management system for the faun named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Water Resources as specified in 15A
NCAC 2T .1300 (formerly 2H .0217) and the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil
and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2T.1300 (formerly 2H.0217)and 15A NCAC 6F.0101-.0105.
The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storase, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
''111111if11�ry,,
o Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP) ��.� S� eA'RO/f•.y
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity;storage capability consistent with wi i / ts.
oaAs
d New, expanded or retrofitted facili (SD) S E A L Z
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collectiotSyst4ns, laDQee2pnd #ondj,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry F. Graham P.E. PAI� 1SG.•`� Ili
ft.lii1.10
Affiliation ,tvlObnM&-oaf r_V,� ✓►cum _Date Work Completed�-
Address (Agency) 4,4, W6 _ AC-2kgtS - ' ,.,Phone No.9/4--4q -
Signature: Date:
• B) Land Applic on Site P)
The plan provides for minimum separations(buffers);adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is suitable
for waste management; and the hydraulic and nutrient Ioading rates are appropriate for the site and receiving crop.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): Wally Walker
Affiliation Alamance SWCD Date Work Completed:;�?/"/,6�
Address (Agency): 09 N Graham Hopedale Rd. Burlington, NC 27217—Phone No.:336-228-1753 x3-
Signature: Date:
Q Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
o Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC) �a� �� 'SRO '�.
1
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
r r. ..
O Facility with exterior lots (RC) ! 5 E R
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use artH ve bLI609sig4d irC
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS. M p •, .r
',. 0;P S0 �1G�Q'r��•'
Name of Technical Specialist(PIease Print): Larry F. Graham P.E. 'h;,, NC1S :.•'�
Affiliation t,,Aaw Date Work Completed:
• Address (Agency : G aAlca. Phone No.: 410-S Sf f- #
Signature: Date: /.X 7- /6
AWC-September 18,2006 2

D). Application and Handling Equipment �►
Check the appropriate box
J + Existing or expanding facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
• accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste
management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed
either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established;
required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan).
o New,expanded,or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for spray irrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications
has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
o New,expanded, or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for land spreading not usings pray
irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications
has been established;required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Wally Walker
Affiliation Alamance SWCD Date Work completed /r S- -- l i
Address (Agency): 209 N Graham Hopedale Rd. Burlington NC 27217_Phone No.: 336-228-1753 x3_
Signature: Dater_",
• E) Odor Control, Insect Control, MortalityManagement and Emergency Actiop"TYAWI[P
-- SI, WUP, RC or I� ��oO -•C•. °�o��
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checigt1SA
'•,�
Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of botl'dorl aid�A 0-
been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and est LFer4ment 4
Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management ply. oth t11d aliti
Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by thiz'� M ��
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): Larry F. Graham P.E. '•��' '•• Q �•`
Affiliation Date Work Completed: s•�� �; .s+`'���,
Address (Age X Phone No.:Q12
Signature: Date: — 6
F) Written Notice /fNeWOZpanding Swine Farm
The foIlo►ving signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996,when was it constructed or last expanded
I(we)certify that I(we)have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners who
own property located across a public road,street,or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in
compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified are
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
• Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC-September 18,2006 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation `•����er�rrrr
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI) ��.•`'��N� � Rp ''•ar
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and pond', ���
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specific JfionV'k
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is neces$rrya
5 EAE
11602
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry F. Graham P.E.
Affiliation ✓ Date Work Completed: ��/�r .•`'`�
Address (Agency): VC- �Sr Phone No.: qV
Signature: Date: `/--,Z 7-/6
B) Land Application Site UP)
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): Wally Walker
Affiliation Alamance SWCD Date Work Completed:/-2/-/6r
Address (Age cy;./229 N rah - Hopedale Rd. Burlington NC 27217_Phone No.: 336-228-1753 x3_
Signature: . EGG Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC) •00,1122st" It
Facility with exterior lots �.+`'CL CAi�plZ'
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have beee
the plan. t Q i _
• S EAL
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessat _
M r. 11642 f�
Name of Technical Speciahs (Please Print): Larry F. Graham P.E.
Affiliation Date Work Completed.'.
Address Phone No.:
Signatur . Date: ' Z—.-I 7--M
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
o Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner has
proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): Wally Walker
Affiliation Alamance SWCD Date Work Completed
. Address (Agency):209 N Graham- Hopedale Rd. Burlington NC 27217 Phone No.: 336-228-1753 0 _
Signature:,A - Date:
AWC-September 18JO 6 4

E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD, SI, WUP, RC or 1)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print):� / F 44&4a i _P.E-,
Affiliatio sd,rv,twl, ,1, vt Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): j�o GALZ4,leeii -1 Phone No.: Q/Q��y
Signature: Date:
`,�y{ttiH!/Il
Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Resources at the foil . .op
Department of Environment and Natural Resources A
Division of Water Resources ? 1602
Animal Feeding Operations Unit .9y& r�Q�,•`
1636 Mail Service Center �'•��' �P•`~
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636 �''•.,,� NC8121 �S�011
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the DWR Regional Office and the local Soil and Water Conservation
District Office and to keep a copy in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
•
AWC-September IS,2006 6

USDA United States Natural NC-CPA-17
��— department of Resources Rev. Dec. 2000
Agriculture Conservation Page 1 of 2
Service..
\VASTE NIAiNACEi14ENT FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL INFORiMATION y.f
1
Naine �Y��Iv (11. dvsl.5.��/1{� Location L��,=T_%�r. `�- I �J
Address 45�f=:( i l�1►.'[�7a'�l�ll/� �c7 ff Fc1�� `�tiJ` �/ ,. J' ,
✓�c�c�IG.�vrJ3, N�- w 73 v y
_ yoir►a co ws'
Telephone, - 3�E7 Size of Operation(animal units) v p l3
LOCATION DATA '
DISTANCE FROM N EARESTRESIDENCE NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER _FT f/_
DISTANCE FROM NEAREST PUBLIC FACILITY(school,church,etc...) 4�ty�i�.�l s'�(.�'?(� 1'f 77—
I5 SITE WITHIN 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN? YES_NO-Z
If yes,NRCS cnumot provide assistance. /
IS SITE AT LEAST 100 FT.FROM A"BLUE LINE"PERENNIAL STREAM? YES y NO
If uo,site imist be relocated. : /
DOES SITE MEET MINIMUM STATE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FROM A YES {/ NO_
WELL SUPPLYING WATER FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION?
If no,NRCS cannot proAde assistwice. /
IS S1TEWITHIN I•MILE ZONING JURISDICTION OF A MUNICIPALITY? YES NO
If'•es,landotYner should conSillt.►illi►n local zoning board about required
liermlts. Permits moist be obtaiuedprior to desigii approval.
ARE UTILITY LINES LOCATED IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA? YES NO t�
If yes,see Part 503 of the National Engineering NInntial for policy.
(Copies of maps or outer reference niittei-ial ittay Ile attached to site evaluation.)
1VETLANDS
WILL PROJECT INVOLVE CLEAR1Tv'G VEGETATION,IMPROVING DRAiNAGG,OR FILLING LOW GROUND?
iEyes,prodiicer should have a"CeRitied'Wetlnnd-Dcic;mination"on file-for the:n•ork site. YES NO I�
-Prodticeis-shall corttplete forms CPA-038.atid AD-1026 to obtain Certified Wctland Detenninntions.
WILL THE PROJECT INVOLVE DIRECTOR INDIRECT MANIPULATION OF WETLAND SOILS,
1.,.' PLANTS,ORHYDAOLOGY? YES NOL/
IF WETLANDS WILL BE:MANIPULATEDJiAS THE PRODUCER.BEEN ADVISED THAT THEY MUST NOT WORK IN
WETLANDS UNTIL THEY HAVE RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM THE U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE
NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY CONCERNING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS? YES NO
MRCS WILL PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR PROJECTS IMPACTING WETLANDS ONLY UNDER THE
FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES:
a.)NRCS has detenninLA that a suitable non-wetland site is not available YES_NO
b.)The niosl practical site for the project involves wetlands. MRCS has detenn'ined this site to be mosi'practical considering the
change of wetland functions,the suitability of the resource for this project,the costs,and best available technology. The producer,
accordiug to a mitigation plan.provided or approved by NRCS,shall mitigate unavoidable inipacls to wetlands.
YES NO
OD'011 CONTROL
HAS ODOR CONTROL BEEN DISCUSSED WITH PRODUCER:
- PREDOMINAi4t WIND.DIRECT[ON? YES-NO
- PRE:CHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH WATER TO AI'LEAST'fr OF THE CAPACITY? YES__L NO
■ USING GOOD SOUND JUDGEMENT IN LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE? YFCS__i/ NO

NC-CPA-17
Rev. Dec. 2000
• Page 2 of 2
OTHER ENWRONMENTAL FACTORS
If tite aitstti'er to any of the folloti• ng is YES,MRCS may provide technical assistance according to its
General'll7anual.policies. Contact the resource specialist for assistance,if needed.
USING THE FOTG LIST OF ENDANGERED&THREATENED SPECIES AS A GUIDE,IS IT OBVIOUS THAT THE SITE
PROVIDES HABITAT FOR A LISTED SPECIES? YES NO
IS A DESIGNATED NATURAL SCENIC AREA INCLUDED IN THE PLANNING AREA,OR YES NO t�
WILL PLANNED.ACTIONS IMPACT ON AN ADJACENT NATURAL SCENIC AREA?
HAS A,CULTURAL RE SOURCES REVIEW BEEN PERFORMED FOR THE AREA,PRIOR TO STARTING ANY OUND
DISTIIRBINGACTIVITIES? �',yt�d;rl�a YESVNO
ARETHERE PRIME,UNIQUE,STATE OR LOCALLY IMPORTANT YES NO—Z'
FARMLANDS IN THE OPERATING UNIT?
WILL THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING? YES NO_
WASTE tMANAGEi/IEANT
DOES PRODUCER OWN.ENOUGH LAND TOTROPERL••Y APPLY ALL WASTE INCLUDING YES NOj
SLUDGE,EVEN THOUGH SLUDGE MAY BE ONLY APPLIED INFREQUENTLY?
IF NO,DOESPRODUCER HAVE ACCESS TO MORE LAND? YES_NO
IF LAND.IS NOT OIVNED BY PRODUCER,CAN PRODUCER GET AN AGREEMENT FOR YES—ZNO
LAND ON WHICH WASTE.WILL BE APPLIED?
(Attach Waste UtilizatiomPlau to,site evaluation.)
• SOIL INVESTIGATION(.VALID ONLY IF SOIL INVESTIGATION SHEET ATTACHED)
IS SOIL SUITABLE FOR LAGOON? YES,NO
IS A LINER REQUTRED? YES NO_Z'
TYPE OF'LTNER TO BE USED: CLAY BENTONITE SYNTHETIC
1F CLAY LINER IS TO BE, USEQ„]S�SUITABLE CLAY AVAILABLE ON SITE? YES /NO
IF CLAY.IS NOT AVAILABLE ON Sfft,DOES;LANDOlYNERtiAVE ACCESS TO CLAY? YES—NO
IS A CORE TRENCH-REQUIRED?(Attach soil investigation sheet to.site.eva III at.ion.) YES NO
IS SUBSURFACE DRAIN-TILE PRESENT'?'(If yes,tile must be removed or plugge(l.) YES NO 4/
SITE APPROVED '�S�ti+9e�vtsa�
YES NO CONDITIONAL r, fr
COMMENTS 1.,l, 0
r fy.
,j r =• S L L
-i I y
r r.r• t 7 � .a
This site investigation is.valid for twelve niontlis from the(late shown below. If construction has not bt ed
within ttive[ve ntontlts,a new site investigation\ re ircd./1
1*0�48211 BOIL
V
Signa tr Date � _� �, C�/,
• �E Changes in the local or state LlOr changes in the standard could require a new site investigation.

IV, *
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
01-21-2016
This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been developed by:
Triple W Farm Wally Walker
Harold Woody Alamance SWCD
3545 East Greensboro 209 N Graham-Hopedale Rd.
Chapel Hill Rd.
Snow Camp, NC 27349 Burlington, NC 27217
336-228-1753 iex%,
Y.
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
27- /f�
Signature(owner) Date
Signature(manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved B �`/ ��1! --
PP :Y
Technica Specialist Signature Date
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-21-2016 Cover Pa e 1

L�
i
r
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S 1 Dairy(Milk Cow) Solid waste generated 5,440,00 tons/year by a 320 animal Dairy
(Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 23392
Incorporated 31008
Injected NIA
Irrigated NIA
Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Quantity Surplus/Deficit
PAN Qbs) * Applied(lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied (Tons) (Tons)
Year 1 23,772 36839 -13,067 8,283.81 -2,843.81
S3 Dairy(Milk Cow) Lagoon Liquid waste generated 746,160 gals/year by a 80 animal
Dairy(Milk Cow) Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 150 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
. Broadcast 1771
Incorporated 2750
Injected 2976
Irrigated 1884
Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/
PAN Qbs) * Applied(lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Gallons) Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1 1,771 9730 -7,959 4,100,468 -3,354,308
------------- --- - ------- --------- --- - --- -- -- --------------------- --- - - --------------------------------------------------------------
Note: 1n source ID, S means standard source,U means user defined source.
*Max.Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-21-2016 Source Page 1 of 2

t,
S45 Dairy(Heifer) Solid waste generated 2,400.00 tons/year by a 200 animal Dairy(Heifer)
Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 10320
Incorporated 13680
Injected N/A
Irrigated N/A
Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Quantity Surplus/Deficit
PAN (lbs) * Applied(lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied (Tons) (Tons)
Year 1 10,320 16005 -5,685 3,698.78 -1,298.78
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
*Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-21-2016 Source Page 2 of 2

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield
estimates are also provided for each crop,as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index(LI)and the
Ohosphorous Loss Assessment Tool(PLAT)Rating are also provided for each field,where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High,any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested
plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive
no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating,starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance
with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in
the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
r 0.�'rk I
rTract
dCrops Summary `�i//Total Useable Plat P205
Field Acres Acres Rating Removal Applied
Ll Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (ibs/acte) (Ibslacre)
34�V 1 HW 1 ✓ 15.60 15.60 Low N/A Herndon Grain Sorghum,Silage 19.2 Tons 58 NIA
Small Grain,Silage 10,8 Tons 58 N/A
l HWZ V 29.50 29.50 Low NIA Georgeville Grain Sorghum,Silage 19.2 Tons 58 NIA
Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 NIA
i HW3 V 16,60 16.60 Low NIA Georgeville Grain Sorghum,Silage 18.0 Tons 54 NIA
Small Grain,Silage 10.1 Tons 55 NIA
1 HW4✓ 23.40 23.40 Low N/A Georgeville Grain Sorghum,Silage 18.0 Tons 54 NIA
Small Grain,Silage 10.1 Tons 55 NIA
2 HRI 11.60 11.60 Low NIA Georgeville Grain Sorghum,Silage 19.2 Tons 58 NIA
Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 NIA
2 HR2 7.54 7.54 Low NIA Georgeville Fescue Pasture 4.6 Tons 7 NIA
3 2410 F1 14.50 14.50 Medium NIA Alamance Fescue Hay 4.4 Tons 69 NIA
Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA
2410 F2 6.73 6.40 Medium NIA Alamance Fescue Hay 4.4 Ton 69 NIA
Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA
3 ELI 15.00 15.00 Low N/A Nanford Fescue Hay 4.4 Tons 69 NIA
Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA
3 EL2 4.13 4.13 Medium NIA Cid Fescue Hay 4.4 Tons 69 NIA
Small Grain Overseed 1,0 Tons is NIA
3 EL3 12.70 12.701 Low NIA Nanford Fescue Hay 4.1 Tons 64 NIA
Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA
3 EL4 9A2 9.42 Low NIA Nanford Fescue Hay 4.1 Tons 64 NIA
Small Grain Oversew 1.0 Tons 15 NIA
30637 1 41.00 38.00 Unknown NIA Nanford Fescue Hay 4.3 Tons 68 NIA
30637 2 32.0 30.00 Unknown NIA Nanford Fescue Hay 4.3 Tons 68 NIA
30637 3 18.0 16.00 Unknown NIA Nanford Fescue Hay 4.3 Tons 68 NIA
30637 4 66.0 64.00 Unknown NIA Georgeville Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 75 NIA
30637 5 '12.00 10.00 Unknown NIA Nanford Fescue Hay 4.3 Tons 68 NIA
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 1/21/2016
PCS Page 1 of 2 \
NOTE: Symbol *means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P205
Tract Field Acres Acres RatingRemoval Applied
LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (]bs/acre) (]bslacre)
30637 6 56.00 54.00 Unknown NIA Georgeville Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 75 NIA
4 JWl 1 8,47 7.45 Low NIA Nanfoni Fescue Pasture 4.1 Ton 7 NIA
4 JW2 4.63 4.63 Low NIA Georgeville Fescue Pasture 4.9 Ton 8 NIA
4 J W3 4.501 4.501 Low NIA Cid Fescue Pasture 4A Tonsl 7NIA
PLAN TOTALS: 409.32 394.97
LI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance
<2 Low potential to contribute to soluble None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>=2& Moderate potential to contribute to Nutrient Management(590)should be planned.
c— IO soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management(590)should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone. the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10 considered. Examples are Cover Crops(340)to scavenge nutrients,Sod-Based Rotations
(328),Long-Term No-Till(779),and edge-of-field practices such as Filter Strips(393)and
Riparian Forest Buffers(391).
PLATIndex Rating P Management Recommendation
0-25 Low No adjustment needed;N based application
25 - 50 Medium No adjustment needed;N based application
51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal
> 100 Very High Starter P application only
Preview Database Version 3A Date Printed 1/21/2016
PCs Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol *means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed
to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient requirements,and proper tiz7ing of applications
to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or c the-
by-products,commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the
indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the
plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (1bs/A) PA M==A Manure Manure Manuro
Nuaient Nutrient NutncNA pplied Appied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
UWA) aWA) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applie, Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
f
3�8 1 HWi S45 Hemdon 15,60 15.60 Grain Sorghum,Silage 19.2 4/1-9/15 144 0 0 Broad 144 0.00 33.49 0.00 522.41
G 1 HW I S l Herndon 15.60 15.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 "9/1-3/15 117 0 0 Broad 117 0.00 27 21 0.00 424.4
1 HW2 S3 Gcorgeville 29.50 29.50 Grain Sorghum,Silage 19.2 4/1-9/15 144 74 0 Broad. 701 29.50 0.00 870.24 0.0
I HW2 S3 Georgeville 29.50 29.50 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 *9/1-3/15 117 47 0 Broad. 70 29.50 0.00 870,24 0.00
l HW3 S3 Georgeville 16.60 16.60 Grain Sorghum Silage 19.0 4/1-9115 135 65 0 Broad. 70 29.50 0.00 489,70 0.00
1 HW3 S3 Georgeville 16.60 16.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.1 *9/1-3/15 109 39 0 Broad 1 70 29.50 0.001 489,70 0,0
1 HW4 S3 Georgcville 23AO 23.40 Grain Sorghum,Silage 18.0 4/1-9/15 135 65 0 Broad. 70 29,50 0.00 690,30 0.0
1 HW4 S3 Goorgeville 23.40 23.40 Small Grain,Silage 10.1 *9/1-3/15 109 39 0 Broad 70 29.50 0.00 690.30 0.00
T- 2 HRl S45 Goorrgevillc 11,60 11.60 Grain Sorghum,Silage 19.2 4/1-9/1 S 144 0 0 Broad 144 0.00 33.49 0.00 388.46
2 HRl I S45 Goorgeville 11.60 11.60 Small Grain,Silage 10.8 *9/1-3/I 1I 0 1 0 Broad, 117 0.00 26,12 0.00 302.94
2 HR2 S45 Georgeville 7.54 7.54 Fescue Pasturc 4.6 Tons 8/1-7131 150 0 0 Broad 150 0.00 33.48 0.00 252.45
2410 Fl S 1 Alamance 14.50 14.50 Fescue Hay 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 1 191 0 0 Broad 191 0.00 4163 0.00 618.19
4
2410 Fl I N/A Alamanee 14.50 14.50 Small Grain Ovoracod 1,0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 50 0 NIA 0 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2410 F2 S1 Atamancc 6.73 6.40 Fescue Hay 4.4Tons 8/I-7I31 191 0 1 0 Broad, 191 0.00 42.63 0.00 272.85
2410 F2 N/A Alamanee 6.73 6.40 Small Grain Overseed 1,0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 50 0 N/A 0 told
0.00 0.00
3 EL1 51 anford 15.00 15.00 Fescue Hay 4,4 Tons 8/1-7/31 191 0 0 Broad. 191 0.00 639,50
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:2/25/2016 WUT Page 1 of 2
Lol. `"

Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen Comm Res, Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fen. (lbs/A) PA ManurcA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic, Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID I Soil Series Acres Acres I Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tans 1000 gals tons
3 ELI NIA Nanford 15.00 15.00 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 50 1 0 N/A 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 EL2 S1 Cid 4.13 4.13 Fescue Hay 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 191 0 0 Broad. 191 0.00 42.63 0.00 176.08
3 EL2 NIA Cid 4.13 4.13 Small Grain Overwed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 50 0 NIA 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 ED S I Nanford 12.70 12.70 Fescue Hay 4.1 Tons 811-7/31 178 0 0 Broad. 178 0,00 39.73 0,00 504.59
3 EL3 N/A Nanford 12.70 12.70 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 50 0 NIA 0 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
3 EL4 St Nanford 9.42 9.42 Fescue Hay 4,1 Tons 8/1-7131 178 0 0 Broad. 178 0,00 39.73 0,00 374.27
3 EL4 N/A Nanford 9.42 9,42 Small Grain Ownseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 50 0 N/A 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
30637 1 SI Nanford 41.00 38.00 Fescue Hay 4.3 Tons 811-7/31 186 66 0 Broad. 120 0.00 27.91 0.00 1,060.45
30637 2 Sl Nanford 32.00 30.00 Fescue Hay 4.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 186 36 0 Broad. 150 0.00 34.88 0.00 1,046.50
30637 3 Sl Nanford 18.00 16.00 Fescue Hay 4.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 186 36 0 Broad. 150 0.00 34.88 0.00 558.13
30637 4 Sl Georgeville 66.00 64.00 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 208 58 0 Broad, 150 0.00 34.88 0.00 2,232.52
30637 5 S45 Nanford 12.00 10.00 Fescue Hay 4.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 186 36 0 Broad. 150 0.00 34.88 0.00 348.83
30637 6 S45 Georgevillc 56.00 54.00 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 208 58 0 Broad. 150 0,00 34.88 0,00 1,883.69
4 JW l S l Nanford 8.47 7.45 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/I-7/31 133 0 0 1 Broad. 133 0.00 29.69 0.00 221,17
4 JW2 Sl Gcorgeville 4.63 4.63 Fescue Pasture 4.9Tons 8/1-7/31 159 0 0 Broad. 159 0.00 35.49 0.00 164.32
4 JW3 S l Cid 4.50 4.50 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 143 0 0 Broad. 143 0,00 31.92 0,00 143.64
Total Applied, 1000 gallons 4,100.47.
Total Produced, 1000 gallons 746.16
Balance, 1000 gallons -3,354,31
Total Applied,tons 1 1,982.59
)' Total Produced,tons _ 7,840.00
Balance,tons -4,142.59
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol *means user entered data,
� r
Preview 0
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2016 WUT Page 2 of

t
The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management
• plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the
plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient requirements and soil test
results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are
utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste
be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In
such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended
amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu. Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field I HW1 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App,Period 15.60 *3/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Hemdon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FAp.
10.8 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 117 122 171 38 l 1 4 0
58 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 122 171 38 1 1 0 0
1 HWI Req'd Nutrients 144 0 to 0 0 0 0 1
15.60 411-9115 Supplied By:
CROP Grain Sorghum,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Hemdon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 19.2 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 144 145 204 74 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 58 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 145 194 74 3 2 1 0
Tract Field 1 H W2 Req'd Nutrients 144 0 10 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 29.50 411-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Grain Sorghum, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 19.2 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 701 58 148 38 1 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 58 ibslac. Low BALANCE 0 58 138 38 1 2 0 0
Tract Field 1 HW2 Req'd Nutrients 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App,Period 29.50 *311-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 1 05-02-13 Manure 70 58 148 38 l 1 2 0 0
IP Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 58 148 38 l 1 2 01 0
�eview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2016 NMR Page I of 6

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR I N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cat Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (1bs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract FF51d 1 HW3 Req'd Nutrients 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 16.60 *3/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0i 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 10.1 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 70 58 148 38 1 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 55 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 58 148 38 1 2 0 0
Tract Field 1 HW3 Req'd Nutrients 135 0 10 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 16.60 4/1-9115 Supplied By:
CROP Grain Sorghum,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 18.0 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 70 58 148 38 1 2 01 0
P Removal Rating 54 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 58 138 38 1 2 0 0
Tract Field I HW4 Req'd Nutrients 135 0 10 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 23.40 411-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Grain Sorghum,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0
YE Sample Date 18.0 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 70 58 148 38 1 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 54 lbslac. Low BALANCE 0 58 138 38 1 2 0 D
Tract Field 1 HW4 Req'd Nutrients 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 23.40 *3/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Gcorgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 10.1 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 70 58 148 38 1 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 55 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 58 148 38 1 2 0 0
Tract Field 2 HRl Req'd Nutrients 144 0 10 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 11.60 4/1-9115 Supplied By:
CROP Grain Sorghum, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 19.2 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 144 145 204 74 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ae. Low BALANCE 0 145 194 74 3 2 1 0
�eview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2016 NMR Page 2 of 6

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs1A) (Ibs/A) (ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tonslA)
Tract Field 2 HRi Req'd Nutrients 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 11.60 *3/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 10.8 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 117 1831 256 57 21 2 0 0
P Removal IRating 58 Ibslac. Low BALANCE 0 183 256 57 2 2 01 0
Tract Field 2 HR2 Req'd Nutrients *150 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 7.54 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.6 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 150 234 328 74 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 7 Ibslac. Low BALANCE 0 234 328 74 3 2 1 0
Tract Field 2410 Fl Req'd Nutrients 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 14.50 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Alamance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
. YE Sample Date 4A Tons 05-02-13 Manure 191 298 418 94 4 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 69 lWac. Medium BALANCE 0 298 418 94 4 3 1 0
Tract Field 2410 F1 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 14.50 1011-3131 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Alamance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 15 Ibslac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 01 01 0
Tract Field 2410 F2 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 6.40 1011-3131 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Oversecd Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Alamance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 15 lbs/ac. IMedium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*View Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2016 NMR Page 3 of 6

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract FHeld 2410 F2 Req'd Nutrients 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 6.40 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Alamance Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 191 298 418 94 4 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 69lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 298 4181 94 4 3 1 0
Tract Field 3 ELI Req'd Nutrients 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 15.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4A Tons 05-02-13 Manure 191 298 418 94 4 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 69 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 298 418 94 4 3 1 0
Tract Field 3 ELI Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 D 0 0 0
Acres App,Period 15.00 10/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
YE Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0
P Removal Rating 15 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 3 EI2 Req'd Nutrients 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 4.13 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescuc Hay Starter 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Cid Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 191 298 418 94 4 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 69 lbslac. Medium BALANCE 0 298 418 941 4 3 1 0
Tract Field 3 EL2 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 4.13 10/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cid Residual 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 1 05-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
P Removal Rating 15 lbslac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
view Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2016 NMR Page 4 of 6

1 r
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 3 EL3 Req'd Nutrients 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 12.70 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.1 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 178 278 389 87 3 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 64 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 278 389 871 3 3 11 0
Tract Field 3 EL3 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 12.70 10/1-3131 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Nanford Residual 4 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 15 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 3 ElA Req'd Nutrients 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App,Period 9,42 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.YE Sample Date 4.1 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 178 278 389 87 3 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 64 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 278 389 87 3 31 1 0
Tract Field 3 EL4 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 9.42 1011-3131 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 15 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 4 JW1 Req'd Nutrients 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 7.45 8/1-7/31 Supplied By: I
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.1 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 133 208 291 65 31 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 1 01 208 291 65 3 2 0 0
Oview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2016 NMR Page 5 of 6

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract T Field 4 JW2 Req'd Nutrients 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 l
Acres App.Period 4.63 8/1-7131 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Cseorgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 159 24$ 348 78 3 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 248 348 78 3 3 1 0
Tract Field 4 JW3 Req'd Nutrients 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 4.50 811-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Cid Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 05-02-13 Manure 143 223 313 70 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 7 1bs/ac, Low BALANCE 0 223 313 70 3 2 1 0
NOTE: Symbol *means user entered data.
view Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2016 NMR Page 6 of 6

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following tablapmy1 a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels
of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an it analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant
growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount
of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current so]] index
for copper or zinc,we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices,this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample.
Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
ValuesReouired Soil Test
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
LI
HWl Grain Sorghum,Silage 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 None
HW1 Small Grain,Silage 5.5 0.0 414 None 431 None
HW2 Grain Sorghum,Silage 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 None
HW2 Small Grain,Silage 5.5 0.0 414 None 431 None
1 HW3 Grain Sorghum,Silage 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 None
l HW3 Small Grain,Silage 5.5 0.0 414 None 431 None
l HW4 Grain Sorghum,Silage 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 None
l HW4 Small Grain,Silage 5.5 0,0 414 None 431 None
2 HRI Grain Sorghum,Silage 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 None
2 HRI Small Grain,Silage 5.5 0.0 414 None 431 None
2 HR2 Fescue Pasture 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 None
2410 Fl Fescue Hay 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 None
2410 Fl Small Grain Overseed 5.5 0.0 414 None 431 None
2410 F2 Fescue Hay 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 None
2410 F2 Small Grain Overseed 5.5 0.0 414 None 431 None
3 ELI Fescue Hay 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 None
3 EL1 Small Grain Overseed 5.5 0.0 414 None 431 None
3 EL.2 Fescue Hay 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 None
3 EI-2 Small Grain Overseed 5.5 0.0 414 None 431 None
3 EL3 Fescue Hay 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 None
3 EW Small Grain Overs.eed 5.5 0.0 414 None, 431 None
3 ELR Fescue Hay 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 1 None
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-21-2016 STV Page 1 of 2

Recuired Soil Test V 1
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop PH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
3 EL4 Small Grain Oveseed 5.5 0.0 414 None 431 None
4 J W l Fescue Pasture 5.5 0.8 414 None 431 None
4 JW2 Fescue Pasture 1 5.5 0,81 414 1 None 431 None
4 JW3 Fescue Pasture 1 5.5 1 0.81 414 1 None 431 None
a
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-21-2016 STV Page 2 of 2

r
s
The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
Sutilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each
source,the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent At clean out,
this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. Inmost cases,the priority nutrient is
nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous,copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally
very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally,effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible,care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and
lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Maximum Maximum Sludge
Crop PA-N Rate Application Rate Minimum Acres Minimum Acres Minimum Acres
lb/ac 1000 gal/ac 5 Years Accumulation 10 Years Accumulation 15 Years Accumulation
Dairy(Milk Cow) Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu 150 23.25 33.12 66.24 99.35
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E. 300 46.50 16.56 33.12 49.68
Soybean 40 bu 160 24.80 31.05 62.10 93.14
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prcview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-30-2015 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity
available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage
capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered
by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage
volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity,this indicates
that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is
negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either
of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with
the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste St ra e Capacity
Source Name Dairy(Mills Cow) Lagoon Liquid Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date 1111 150
Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity(Days)
1 1 59
1 2 31
1 3 150
1 4 150
1 5 119
1 6 89
1 7 58
1 8 27
1 9 150
1 10 119
1 11 89
1 12 58
*Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-30-2015 Capacity Page I of 1

Crop Notes
•
The following crop note applies to field(s): JW3
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. I to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): HR2, JW1, JW2
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. I to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): EL2
Small Grain: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, oats and barley should be planted from October 1-October 25; and rye from October
15-November 10. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the'optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding
rate by at least 10% when planting no-till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2 deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 Ibs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February-March.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 1-30-2015 Crop
Note Pa--------------e I of 4
-------------------------

The following crop note applies to field(s): C4
Small Grain: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, oats and barley should be planted from October 1-October 25; and rye from October
15-November 10. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding
rate by at least 10%when planting no-till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 112
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2 deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February-March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): C5, F1, F2, W2
Small Grain: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, oats and barley should be planted from October 1-October 25; and rye from October
15-November 10. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding
rate by at least 10%when planting no-till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 112
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2 deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February-March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): Cl, C2, C3, EL1, ED, EL4, P1, WI
Small Grain: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, oats and barley should be planted from October 1-October 25; and rye from October
15-November 10. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding
rate by at least 10%when planting no-till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2 deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February-March.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-30-2015 Cr op Note Pa e 2 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): EL2
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont, tali fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 201b/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Ib/ac. N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): C4
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 201b/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Ib/ac. N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): C5, Fl, F2, W2
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lblac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 1-30-2015 Crop Note Page 3 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): C1, C2, C3, ELI, EL3, EL4,P1, W1
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lblac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. I to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): HRI, HW1, HW2, HW3, HW4
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 112" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when
planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): HR1, HW1, HW2, HW3, HW4
Sorghum and sorghum/sudan hybrids planted for silage are normally planted from May 15 to July 15 in
the Piedmont and Mountains. They can be a good substitute for late planted corn and are more drought
tolerant. Review data available to select a variety with the characteristics needed for your area. Planting
rates are usually 9 to 12 pounds per acre planted and 20 to 25 pounds drilled. See recommended planting
rate on bag for best results per variety. Apply phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test
before planting. A nitrogen rate of 100 to 120 pounds of nitrogen is sufficient for crop growth. Nitrogen
should be applied at 7-9 pounds per ton of expected yield. The total amount of nitrogen is dependent on
soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the
sorghum. Timely management of weeds is essential. You will need to get protected seed before some
herbicides can be used. Check with your local extension agent for herbicides and seed treatments
necessary before planting. Plant a cover crop after you harvest silage.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-30-2015 Crop Note Page 4 of 4

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
• 4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips
are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office
Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/30/2015 Specification Pap-e 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events,
or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth; The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
S the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 19959
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/30/2015 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
i or wetlands by a discharge or by over-spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied
at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre-plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------_--------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/30/2015 Specification Page 3

' f
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
• least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate-determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/30/2015 Specification Page 4

{. +4"r
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT and
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633
Prepared for:
By:
Farm: Tract: Date:_
To utilize agricultural wastes for
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT? livestock feed or as an energy source.
The conservation practice, Nutrient CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
Management, is managing the amount, MANAGEMENT 1 WASTE UTILIZATION
source, placement, form and timing of the PLAN
application of nutrients and soil amendments
to achieve realistic production goals, while
minimizing nutrient movement to surface or The information provided in this Job
ground waters. The practice, Waste Sheet and the attachments meet the
Utilization, is using agricultural waste such as minimum requirements far a Nutrient
manure or wastewater in an environmentally Management Plan for USDA-NRCS
sound manner. These practices are jointly purposes. This Nutrient Management
accomplished through the development of a Plan includes:
Nutrient Management/Waste Utilization Plan, r
which is normally part of a broader � A plan map and soils map for the area
Conservation Plan that addresses multiple planned (these may be part of the
overall Conservation Plan).
natural resource concerns on the land.
2. Location of designated sensitive areas
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT or resources (streams, wells,
and WASTE UTILIZATION PRACTICES sinkholes, etc.) and any associated
nutrient application setbacks, etc.
Your nutrient management/waste utilization 3. Your planned crop rotation.
plan is intended to accomplish one or more of
the following objectives: 4. Results of soil, plant, water tests.
• To budget nutrients for plant production. b, Results from Phosphorus Loss
• To properly utilize manure or organic by- Assessment Tool (PLAT) or Leaching
products as a plant nutrient source. Index (LI) as required.
• To minimize the delivery of agricultural 6. Realistic yield expectations for the
nutrients to surface and ground water crops in the rotation, and their source
resources. if other than default values approved
• To maintain or improve the physical, for N.C.
chemical, and biological condition of the 7. Recommended nutrient application
soil. rates for nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium, as well as timing, form,
a
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page t

and method of application and REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
incorporation, if applicable. MANAGEMENT")
8. This Job Sheet (or comparable You are required to acquire and comply
information) that provides the following: with all federal, state, or local permit
• General requirements of this practice, requirements related to the handling and
as well as additional requirements to application of manure or organic
meet the natural resource protection materials.
purposes listed above.
• Additional considerations specific to The nutrient management/waste
utilization plan must address all organic
this plan. waste generated at or brought to the
• Operation and maintenance facility. A Waste Utilization Third Party
information associated with this Agreement must exist to address all
practice. organic waste not handled by the nutrient
Because this Nutrient Management Plan manage mentlwaste utilization plan.
includes agricultural organic sources, Manure or organic wastes will not be
additional items are required in the plan to applied to the following areas:
ensure proper waste utilization:
Waste Utilization Agreement (if surface waters,
• applicable) • wetlands, unless constructed as a
Waste Utilization Third Parley component in a waste treatment
• system,
Agreement (if applicable) . soils subject to frequent flooding
• Additional engineering design and during the period when flooding is
operating information for waste storage expected,
structures, transport, and application . frozen, snow-covered, or saturated
system, as applicable. These designs,
and the instructions for operating these soils,
• within 200 feet of a dwelling other
structures, is an integral component of
your overall Nutrient Management) than those owned by the producer,
• within 100 feet of a well,
Waste Utilization Plan.
• Emergency Action Plan to prevent within 25 feet of surface waters, or
overtopping or other discharges from within any other setbacks as identified
storage structures or facilities, as by federal, stake, or local laws or
applicable. regulations (e.g. NC General Statute
prevents swine lagoon effluent from
This plan was developed based on the current being applied within 75 feet of a
NRCS 590 and 633 standards and Federal, residential property boundary or
state, or local regulations or policies. perennial stream or river if the facility
Changes in laws or regulations may was sited on or after October 1995.)
necessitate a revision of the plan.
Manure or organic wastes will be applied
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE in a manner not to reach surface waters,
UTILIZATION wetlands (unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment system),
General property owned by others, or public right-
of-way.
All manure and organic residues must be
applied according to a nutrient management Sludge that accumulates in waste storage
plan (see the following section, "BASIC structures must be analyzed prior to land
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August,2003) Page 2

f
application. Adequate provisions (available The realistic yield expectations (RYEs) in
land and/or third party manure agreements) this plan are based on one or more of the
must exist to ensure sludge is applied in following:
adherence to all nutrient application Default values approved by the N.C.
requirements. All federal and state guidance Interagency Nutrient Management
regarding the proper testing, handling, Committee that incorporate soil
planning, and application of sludge must be productivity information, yield data,
followed for regulated operations. and research with North Carolina
soils, and cropping systems.
Since compliance with all applicable North Additional information on the default
Carolina laws is the responsibility of the values may be found at:
producer, you should consult the most current
version of the Guidance Memo for www.soil.ncsu.edulnmp/ncnmwc/index.htm
Implementing the Environmental Management
Commission's Regulations for Animal Waste Documented actual yield data from
Management for questions. the site, determined by the average of
the highest three yields of the last five
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR consecutive specific crop harvests.
PROVIDING LIVESTOCK FEED (For forage crops, determine the
average of the highest three years of
If applicable, all agricultural wastes or other the last five years.)
organic residues used for feedstock must be . A fertilization rate recommended by
handled in a manner to minimize North Carolina State University may
contamination and preserve its feed value. be used in cases where no yield data
Chicken litter stored for this purpose must be or approved RYE values exist for a
covered. A qualified animal nutritionist shall crop.
develop rations that utilize animal wastes. An RYE inferred from a similar crop
on a soil with similar physical and
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR chemical features may be used for
PROVIDING A SOURCE OF ENERGY new crops or in the absence of other
RYE data. This inferred RYE may
If your facility is to be used for energy ONLY be specified by a certified
production, all energy producing components Nutrient Management planner.
of the system are included in the Nutrient
Management/Waste Utilization Plan and Erosion, runoff, and water management
provisions for the utilization of residues of controls have been planned, as needed,
energy production identified. Your Nutrient on fields that receive nutrients.
Management Plan includes the use of these
residues, if applicable. Soil Testing
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT This nutrient management plan has been
MANAGEMENT developed based on current soil test
results (no older than three years).
General
Soil samples must be collected and
Application of nutrients must comply with all prepared in accordance with North
applicable Federal, state, and local laws and Carolina State University or the North
regulations. Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (NCDA&CS)
Agronomic Division standards or
isrecommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August, 2003) Page 3

A
Soil test analyses can be performed by any NCDA&CS Agronomic Division, or others
laboratory or program that is certified by the certified by the NCDENR.
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Field Risk Assessment
Water Quality, Laboratory Section.
A field-specific assessment of the
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the potential for phosphorus transport from
Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing. each field (or groups of similar fields)
Growers who utilize other laboratories must have been conducted, using the North
request the use of the Mehlich-3 methodology Carolina Phosphorus Loss Assessment
to ensure the test results are compatible with Tool (PLAT)
North Carolina's nutrient management
planning and assessment tools. For statewide PLAT assesses the potential for
consistency, all laboratories used must phosphorus (P) to be transported from the
provide fertilization recommendations using site to surface water through each of the
guidelines and methodologies as referenced four primary loss pathways:
at the NCDA&CS website: • sediment-bound P transported
through erosion,
www.ncagr.com/agronomy/0book:htm . soluble P transported through
Growers are encouraged to use a laboratory surface runoff,
that is supported by field research within the • soluble P leached through the soil
state. profile, and
• non-incorporated source P
Soil testing shall include analysis for all transported through surface
nutrients for which specific information is runoff.
needed to develop the nutrient plan.
Based on the assessment of each loss
Plant Tissue Testing pathway, PLAT produces a single rating
for each field. As shown below, this
Tissue sampling and testing, when used, shall rating will identify whether nitrogen or
be done in accordance with North Carolina phosphorus shall be the rate-determining
State University or NCDA&CS standards or element in developing the planned
recommendations. application rate for manure.
Manure Testing PLAT Rating I Nutrient lication Criteria
LOW Nitrogen-based manure
Nutrient values of manure and organic by- application.
products shall be established for planning MEDIUM Nitrogen-based manure
purposes based on laboratory analysis, apelication.
acceptable default values, or historic records HIGH Manure application limited to
for the operation. phosphorus removal from site
in harvested plant biomass.
When determining actual application rates, a VERY HIGH No additional manure
laboratoryanalysis is required. State application to be specified in
Y q plan for the site.
regulations.require that waste be tested within
60 days of utilization for some operations. In On all sites, regardless of the PLAT
the case of daily spreading, the waste must be rating, starter fertilizers may be
sampled and analyzed at least once a year. recommended in accordance with NCSU
Acceptable laboratories include the guidelines or recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August, 2003) Page 4

In some cases, specific conservation practices nutrients that exceeds the soil test
that reduce the potential for phosphorus recommendation.
#ransport have been incorporated into PLAT.
Examples include buffers or filter strips, . When the plan is being implemented
ponds, water table management, and residue on a phosphorus standard (a PLAT
management and conservation tillage. rating of High or Very High), manure
Similarly, soil erosion rates, either existing or or other organic by-products shall be
planned, have been incorporated into your applied at rates consistent with the
PLAT analysis. This information is shown on phosphorus application guidance
the PLAT results enclosed. Because the below. In such situations, an
management of the site actually affects the additional nitrogen application from
PLAT rating, all practices identified on the non-organic sources may be required
PLAT analysis (including any required to to supply nitrogen at the rate
achieve the specified erosion rate) must be recommended by the RYE.
either already installed or included in a
Conservation Plan for the Nutrient . Within the limits allowed by PLAT,
Management Plan to be approved. manure or other organic by-products
may be applied on soybeans at rates
Nutrient Application Rates equal to the estimated removal of
nitrogen in harvested plant biomass.
Recommended nutrient application rates are
based on North Carolina State University or All nitrogen rates for hay production
NCDA&CS recommendations that consider are for pure grass stands. Due to the
current soil test results, RYES, and nutrient recycling by grazing animals,
management. the planned nitrogen rate per unit
yield for hay crops shall be reduced
Liming material shall be applied as needed to by 25% for the portion of the expected
adjust soil pH to the specific range required by yield that is removed through grazing.
the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum
availability and utilization of nutrients. Phosphorus Application — When
manure or other organic by-products
The application amount and rate (inlhr) for are used, the planned rates of
liquid wastes (e.g. applied through irrigation) phosphorus application shall be based
shall not result in runoff from the site. The on the PLAT rating for the site, as
application shall not exceed the field capacity follows:
of the soil.
Low or Medium Rating —The
The planned rates of nutrient application are planned manure or organic by-
shown on the attached sheets. These rates product application rate is based
have been computed as follows: on the nitrogen needs of the crop.
• Nitrogen Application - When the plan is High Rating — The planned
nitrogen-based (a PLAT rating of Low or manure or organic by-product
Medium), the application rate of manure or application rate is limited to the
organic by-products shall be based on the phosphorus removal rate of the
recommended nitrogen rate using the RYE harvested plant biomass.
for the site (or a rate recommended by
NCSU or NCDA in the case of crops Ve[y High Rating — No additional
without established RYES). This may manure or organic by-product
result in an application rate for other application is specified in the plan.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August,2003) Page 5

t
On all sites, regardless of the PLAT rating, plant nutrient uptake characteristics, while
starter fertilizers containing nitrogen, considering cropping system limitations,
phosphorus, and potassium may be weather and climatic conditions, and field
recommended in accordance with North accessibility. Nutrients shall not be
Carolina State University guidelines or applied to frozen, snow-covered, or
recommendations. saturated soil.
A single application of phosphorus applied Manure or organic by-products shall not
as manure or organic by-product may be be applied more than 30 days prior to
made at a rate equal to the recommended planting of the crop or forages breaking
phosphorus application or estimated dormancy.
phosphorus removal in harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple For nutrients applied through irrigation
years in the crop sequence. systems, application equipment should be
properly calibrated to ensure uniform
• When such single applications are distribution of material at planned rates.
made, the rate shall:
♦ not exceed the recommended Plan Review and Revision Period
nitrogen application rate during the
year of application, or A thorough review and revision (if
needed) of the nutrient management plan
♦ not exceed the estimated nitrogen shall be conducted on a regular cycle, not
removal in harvested plant bio- to exceed five years.
mass during the year of application
when there is no recommended Heavy Metals Monitoring
nitrogen application, or
♦ not be made on sites with a Very For animal waste, including sludge, zinc
High PLAT risk rating. and copper concentrations shall be
Potassium Application — Planned monitored and alternative crop sites for
potassium application rates should application shall be sought when these
match the soil test recommended rates metals approach excessive
as closely as possible. (This is concentrations. The following criteria and
particularly critical in situations where a actions are provided:
potentially harmful nutrient imbalance
in crops or forages may occur, such as
grass tetany). When using manure or ZINC
other organic sources, the addition of Mehlich-3 Index Action
potassium from non-organic sources Zn-I
be required. 300 (21 Ibslac) Peanuts are very sensitive to
may q zinc, and application on peanuts
• Other Plant Nutrients - The planned should be limited.Seek
rates of application of other nutrients if alternative sites when possible.
applicable are consistent with North. The risk of zinc toxicity is
greater with lowH and
Carolina State University or the been seen at 2n-si�il as low as has
NCDA&CS guidelines or 300. t
recommendations. 500(35 Ibslac) Critical toxic level for peanuts.
Cease application on peanuts.'
Nutrient Application Timing 2,000(142 Caution: Seek alternative sites
Ibslac) when possible for all crops.
3,000(213 Critical toxic level for all crops.
Timing of nutrient application shall lbslac) Cease application for all crops."
correspond as closely as possible with
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August,2003) Page 6

likely source. The Leaching Index (LI)
COPPER is included in this plan.
Mehlich-3Index Action
• ICu_1)2,000 (72 Ibslac) Caution:Seek alternative sites While the results of the LI does not affect
when possible for all crops. " your planned nutrient application rates,
3,000 (108 Critical toxic level for all crops. some additional conservation practices
Ibslac) Cease application on all crops." may be specified in the plan to reduce the
" Maintain pH at 6.0 on these risk of nutrient movement from the field, if
sites. applicable.
When sewage sludge is applied, the IMPORTANCE OF MANAGING
accumulation of potential pollutants (including NUTRIENTS
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium,
and zinc) in the soil shall be monitored in Nitrogen and phosphorus are water
accordance with the US Code, Reference 40 soluble elements and either or both may
CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and applicable state be components of organic and inorganic
and local laws or regulations. Additional fertilizers. In soluble forms, both can
information on heavy metal criteria for sewage move with water as leachate down
sludge may be found in Land Application of through the soil, or over the soil surface
Sewage Sludge, EPA/831-B-93-002b as runoff after rainfall. While nitrogen and
publication number at: phosphorus exist in different forms and
htf ://www.e a. ov/rr des✓ ubs/slud e. df may move through different transport
processes on the same site, they both
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR can have detrimental effects on both
MINIMIZING DELIVERY OF NUTRIENTS TO surface and shallow ground water quality.
SURFACE AND GROUND WATER As an example, excess nutrients can
result in accelerated eutrophication with
In areas that have been identified as impaired severe algal blooms and fish kills.
with agricultural nutrients being a likely
source, an assessment shall be completed of Because of the topography, hydrology,
the potential for nitrogen or phosphorus and other factors in the state, the
transport from the site. (The streams/water environmental problems from excess
bodies in this category are listed in the USDA- nutrients reaching surface water may not
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section be exhibited near the contributing source,
I.1 but rather create water quality problems
far downstream. Consequently, the
Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico Basin,
❑ NO the Chowan River, the watershed of the
This nutrient management plan IS NOT in B. Everett Jordan Reservoir, and the
an area where surface waters are watershed of the New River in Onslow
impaired, with agricultural nutrients County are listed as Nutrient Sensitive
identified as a likely source. The Leaching waters in North Carolina.
Index (LI) is not required.
Nitrogen: Nitrogen applied as fertilizer or
organic material is transformed into
❑ YES nitrate and can move with the water
moving downward into the shallow ground
This nutrient management plan IS in an water and eventually to surface waters.
area where surface waters are impaired, (Relatively small amounts of nitrogen
with agricultural nutrients identified as a reach our surface waters through rainfall
runoff. ) The Leaching Index (LI) is a
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August,2003) Page 7

w ,w
required part of the nutrient management plan are needed. (The S.B. 1217
in some areas of the state with surface water interagency group guidelines
impairments. The LI uses soils information accepted by the N.C. Division of
• and local climate data to assess the potential Water Quality for .0200 operations
hazard from leaching of nutrients. The results specify a plan revision when there are
of the LI analysis and recommended actions changes in crops or cropping patterns
are included in your nutrient management that utilize more than 25 percent of
plan, if applicable. the nitrogen generated by the
operation.) As a minimum, nutrient
Phosphorus: Research in recent decades management plans shall be
indicates that, with high soil phosphorus thoroughly reviewed every five years
levels, phosphorus has more potential to be and revised if necessary. The next
transported off-site than recognized in the review will be performed in
past. Phosphorus can be transported in
several ways: (1) attached to soil particles
leaving the field through erosion, (2) in soluble 2. Protect fertilizer and organic by-
form leaving the field in surface runoff, and (3) product storage facilities from weather
in soluble form leaching downward through and accidental leakage or spillage.
the soil profile, and eventually into surface
water. Unlike nitrogen, the most likely 3. Ensure proper calibration of
transport pathway for phosphorus varies by application equipment to ensure
site, and depends upon such factors as soil uniform distribution of material at
erosion rate, soil phosphorus levels, texture of planned rates.
soils, existence of buffers, and other factors.
In N.C., PLAT is the tool used to assess 4. Inspect and maintain the equipment
potential excessive phosphorus losses. The and facilities used to implement the
results of the PLAT analysis and Nutrient Management/Waste
recommended actions are included in your Utilization Plan regularly. Any needed
nutrient management plan, if applicable. repairs should be made in a timely
manner.
If a site receives a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium, then applying manure at rates based 5. Review the Emergency Action Plan, if
on the nitrogen needs of the crop is allowed. applicable, annually.
It is important to realize that this may result in
phosphorus being applied at rates that 6. Records should be maintained for five
significantly exceed the crop's phosphorus years, or for a period as required by
removal rate. In these cases, the planned other Federal, state, or local
nutrient application rate is not sustainable, ordinances, or program or contract
and eventually a PLAT rating of High may be requirements. To ensure adequate
reached. information exists to support sound
nutrient management, NRCS
recommends the following records be
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE included:
You are responsible for safe operation and • Soil test results and
maintenance of this practice, including all recommendations for nutrient
equipment. The following Operation &
application,
Maintenance should be conducted: • Quantities, analyses and sources
of nutrients applied (When the
1 Review the plan annually to determine if actual rates used exceed the
adjustments or modifications to the plan recommended and planned rates
on inorganic fertilizer plans,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August,2003) Page 8

records should indicate the reasons for
the differences, e.g. inability to acquire
custom blended fertilizer.)
+ Dates and method of nutrient
applications,
+ Crops planted, planting and harvest
dates, yields, and crop residues
removed,
Results of water, plant, and organic by-
product analyses, and
• Dates of review and person performing
the review, and recommendations that
resulted from the review.
NOTE: State laws or regulations may
define record-keeping requirements for
some operations.
7. Ensure that workers are protected from
and avoid unnecessary contact with
inorganic fertilizers and organic by-
products. Protection should include the
use of protective clothing when working
with plant nutrients. Extra caution must be
taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic
wastes stored in poorly ventilated
enclosures.,
8. Properly dispose of material generated by
the cleaning of nutrient application
equipment. Excess material should be
collected and stored or field applied in an
appropriate manner. Excess material
should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
9. Properly dispose of or recycle nutrient
containers according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August,2003) Page 9

i• Triple W Farm Dairy animal Waste Utilization Plan
Narrative
Overview
This plan is an updated version of the plan originally produced by Joe
Hudyncia, Environmental Senior Specialist, Division of Soil and Water
Conservation, NC Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services back
in 2014. This updated version has been completed by Alamance County
Soil and Water Conservation District in November of 2015. Mr. Woody,
the producer, has requested this plan due to his recent completion of a
stormwater/waste storage pond onsite that collects headquarters,
parlor, and lot surface rainfall runoff.
Mr. Woody is presently milking 225, but he wanted this plan written for
400 in case he gets his numbers back up to 400. Based on his request
this plan reflects the amount of waste generated for 400 milking cows,
therefore he is actually producing less waste on the farm at this time.
An additional 200 heifers are allocated in this plan to account for
grazing/confined dairy animals of different ages.
Plan Specifics
In order to assess the amount and kind of waste generated, I invited
Michael Shepherd, Environmental Senior Specialist, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation, NC Department of Agriculture & Consumer
Services to meet me at the farm to assign animal numbers to come up
with the best way to account for the amount of liquid and solid waste
that would be generated.
Onsite Mr. Shepard and I assessed the current stormwater/ waste
S, storage pond, production/headquarters layout, field layout, and herd

• sizes, and distribution of animals. On the lots that the animals were
confined we counted those and assigned those as generating solid
waste. Mr. Woody advised us that he was going to install a pipe from
the milking parlor to his storm water/waste storage pond to dispose of
the liquid waste. The stormwater/waste storage pond will receive
primarily lot runoff and a small percentage of liquid waste runoff from
the milking parlor and the adjoining feedlot.
As a result of this onsite assessment we used 400 dairy cows for the dry
pack lounging and milking parlor to come up with the best way to
determine waste volumes in this current nutrient management plan.
From those 400 head, we determined that 80% would be solid waste
and 20% would be liquid waste resulting in 320 cows for solid waste
and approximately 80 cows for stormwater/ waste storage pond liquid.
Additionally, there are variety of dairy animals from baby calves to
mature milk cows, and some of these are on dry lots around the dairy.
We determined approximately 200 animals will produce solids on dry
lot conditions. Three manure types are designated in this plan: dairy
cow lagoon liquid, dairy cow solid, and dairy heifer solid. Solids are the
largest percentage of wastes on this farm.
In this plan, we utilized the software's designated nitrogen amounts
rather than actual sample results. However, Mr. Woody has already
taken stormwater/ waste storage pond samples which indicated the
nitrogen levels (PAN) are much lower than the software's amounts. Mr.
Woody hired Larry Graham, engineer, to design the stormwater/waste
storage pond.
Via email, Mr. Graham estimates'the pond has approximately 150 days
of storage capacity. As soon, as Mr. Graham completes the final
construction checkout, he will be able to provide a specific volume
�•. capacity and storage days. The stormwater/waste storage pond was

• constructed to catch headquarters, parlor, and lot runoff based on
average yearly rainfall. Since runoff volumes can vary drastically, there
is always a possibility that the producer may have to pump more
frequently than 150 days.
Fields are planted in sorghum/sudan silage, small grain silage, or fescue
rotations. In this plan, multiple application seasons and percentages
were allocated to allow flexibility of timing of waste to crops. We made
no changes (from original plan) of useable acres, crop type, application
seasons/percentages, or designations of waste incorporation or
broadcast per field in this plan. This plan shows that Mr. Woody has
sufficient acreage to handle all the manure generated.
At the present time I have the plan set up for hauling the liquid waste,
because no irrigation system is currently in place. For planning
purposes. I have the fields near the dairy location set up to receive the
• liquid waste from the stormwater/ waste storage pond since hauling
longer distances would be more expensive. However, Mr. Woody
reserves the right to use other fields in case of a timing problem or a
need to meet the nutrient needs of another crop.
Future Considerations
The engineer has advised the producer because of the close proximity
of the fields to the storage pond he had the option to use a pump and
travelling irrigation gun to assist him in emptying the storage pond and
that this would be a good option since it would cost considerably less
money and time to pump the liquid waste onto the fields than it would
be to haul it. Irrigation would also allow him to apply moisture to his
growing crops.

If Mr. Woody purchases irrigation equipment in the future a technical
4D specialist can go back in and adjust the plan accordingly. Additionally, if
we visit at a later date and in conversations with Mr. Woody we
determine that there is more liquid waste being generated than we
have accounted for then a technical specialist can adjust the plan
accordingly.
I talked to Mr. Woody and advised him it would be a good idea to
monitor soil tests and make adjustments to his operation schedule to
avoid any possible nutrient accumulations in the fields that he
presently has in his plan.

Waste Conveyance
Solid Waste
The waste from the baby calves and the heifers lounging under the roof
cover of the northwest corner of the dairy barns will be scraped, loaded
and land applied if the land is suitable to do so. If not able to do so at
the time, solids .will be loaded and hauled to the silo beside the road �
rand/ or dry lot at the head of the storm water/waste storage pond to ;
store until it is possible to land apply. Any runoff from this silo drains to
the storage pond.
The solid waste from the dry pack barn is cleaned out twice a year and
land applied.
• The solid waste from the feed bunker side of the dry pack barn is
scraped to the solid waste dry stack at the end of the dry pack barn that
was designed by engineer Larry Graham and land applied in the spring,
unless the-buildup necessitates applying some when field or crop
conditions are acceptable.
Liquid and Solid Waste
The liquid and solid waste generated from the milk parlor will be
scraped and pushedto-the-pit on the back-and pumped_into^a. 5204- 7--J
rgallon .tanker trailer and land applied..If conditions warrant he has
approximately-5-days storage-between the pit and tanker trailer.
The waste from the feed bunk beside the milk parlor is scraped, loaded,
and field applied if conditions are favorable. if conditions are not

favorable it will be scraped and pushed to the push off ramp and stored
for disposal at a later date when field conditions are favorable.
** * NOTE
Mr Woody used to have a spreader that would go under the ramp to
directly push the manure into when he scraped this feed bunker off but
it is no longer available. He has cleaned out the waste that had
accumulated and now has a small pit that he will use to hold the waste
until field conditions warrant spreading. The 1new_sto.rm-_water/-waste
'stor-age-pond-was_constructed-- o-captur-e-lot--runoff_so_anyr-unoff_fcom--j
cthis.storage-spotwiI1-d-rain—0--th-e=drainage-ditch-on-the-outside-of the
pond-and-run-to-a-col lie ction--pit-that-w.il Lail lo.w-solids-to..settle-before=
cdraining-into-the_pond-He wwill_clean-out the-solid-waste that
• cumulates-as-needed.
*Future*
Mr Woody has planned toinstall-a_pipe-fC'or:n-the-end-ofthe-push of#
ra.mpfto--con ey.the_liquid-and-solid-waste-generated-directly-to-the
storage:p nd-He also has plans to,co.nnect-the=pipe-from-the milk —
pa` rlorpit_to_this piper ine also}so_it will=go=directty_to�the_storage pond
. and he will no longer have to pump-it'into his-tariker-trailer. He is
currently waiting on the final checkoff for his storage pond.i i-s_plan's;
f _Zoti�
mare=to=install-it-in-the spring:or_-summer_ en eve r-soil conditions-arm
- dry-enough-to-allow him to do so. As stated earlier any runoff that
would take place before he is able to install the pipe will be captured by
the storage pond.
Irrigation

16 Mr Woody has stated a desire to look into the possibility of acquiring a
travelling irrigation system to dispose of the liquid in his storm water/
waste storage pond. As stated earlier in the narrative this would be a
more efficient method of waste application from this source. Mr
Woody has been told and he understands that if he pursues this option
then he will need to acquire the services from an irrigation certified
tech specialist, or engineer to be sure what he purchases will be
suitable and meet the standards to dispose of the waste from this
source.
Stream Buffers
Mr Woody presently has buffers on the streams that are on the
property around his dairy operation that have been fenced out and
have been inspected by Mellissa Rosebrock an Environmental Senior
Specialist with the NC Division of Water Resources. At present these
fenced out buffers meet the requirements that are set forth in his
permit requirements. Mr Woody stated that he will maintain these
fenced out buffers just as they are and will meet the said requirements
if they are inspected during his annual farm visit from a representative
of the Division of Water Resources. Maps are included in this plan to
show a visual reference for anyone that may be doing his inspection
now or in the future.

usDA . �I(GCS NC -4
am- �v R March 2011
United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservadan Service
• CONTROL OF THE LAND FOR THE CONTRACT PERIOD
The purpose of this document is to provide conservation program applicants with written documentation that they
control the land to be offered for the entire length of the contract period. This form is to be used for parcels of land
that are not owned by the applicant where a verbal rent or lease arrangement may exist. NOTE Formal written lease
agreements may be substituted for this form.
2,,ANDOWNER'NAME' PleasefPlririt hv
�. � � M ��-��' �._-.:��._�����...�-i r�TE1=EFF;IONE#�HOME �:�: �x��. �-
cc��r ooa -.a
R. � F' f.Iease�Print ZI P� �� � � 'TELERH0NEA3'C,rt:ANDQWNERADD $4 q f1,JS.,. 1. �F°+...-`�k�_ r�
t--u. D f tJ, ►7 6z - I q t<
�,� •d c� 1J65�7 €'
f
LESSEE:ORI'RENTFR�e NA ME( Pea e Pr
int w
" aT:IEPHONE# fO ME.��.,..
;MESSEE(MREN IERA,'DDRESSf Please Print TEL"=EPHONEA.'CELL;
FARM NUMBERS)AND'TRACT NUMBERS) FOR �' i PORTION OF$f EAS lNX
ORREN�T:E�iRRtOPR2UNDM "
wi- O N ieldtnUn1bers PER OL � � �
aro
i
C g 6.1 t1MC+3 r�C.7. ClInA f 0.Sk 11 rr-
!3 r, i 0 3 I 2144o L 4 , Tt .t`.+1. YA it P, .'i e—
1LEASE 0R i RENTALlPERIOD1START:DATE N&A A Mg'Li=ASE t0R i RENTAl.4P MODaEND,.DAT EA-%f.,
�f2
I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE REFERENCED LESSEE OR RENTER HAS CONTROL OF THE LAND DESCRIBED ABOVE
AND BEING OFFERED FOR THE EQIP/WHIP/CSP FOR THE INCLUSIVE DATES AS INDICATED ABOVE
SIGN; TurcE=c7FsLr.S. 8iOrcrRr7v7-,l:R ---- _ uATEK - - .
n"u. i%,',�..^,�f'; `* t. :i:,5�3 :iz�. t
SIGNATURE, F r nn "DATE
�O ML4NDOWNER �,_ -. � n�-� -�?i�ik.,. ,r.�
"The U.S. Department of Agriculture(USDA)prohtbits discrimination in all of its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and
where applicable,sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, political beliefs, genetic information, reprisal,or because all or part of an
individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)Persons with disabilities who require alternative means
for communicatlon of program information(Braille, large print, audiotape,etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202)720-260D(voice and TOD)."To file a
complaint of discrimination,write,to USDA,Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil tights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.,
Stop 9410, Washington, DC 2 02 50-94 1 0,or call toll-free at(866)632-9992 (English)or(800)877-8339(TDD)or(866)377-8542(English Federal-relay)or(600)845-
6136 (Spanish Federal-relay). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Me above statements are made in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974(5 U.S.C. 522a). Furnishing this information is voluntary; however,failure to furnish correct,
plete information will result in the withholding or withdrawal of such technical or financial assistance.The information may be furnished to other USDA agencies, the
mal Revenue Service,the Department of Justice, or other State or Federal law enforcement agencies,or in response to orders of a court,magistrate,or administrative
tribunal.

USDA U NC-PGM-1
N RC March 2011
United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
• CONTROL OF THE LAND FOR THE CONTRACT PERIOD
The purpose of this document is to provide conservation program applicants with written documentation that they
control the land to be offered for the entire length of the contract period. This form is to be used for parcels of land
that are not owned by the applicant where a verbal rent or lease arrangement may exist. NOTE Formal written lease
agreements may be substituted for this form.
LANDOWNER NAME(Please Prints TELEPHONE# HOME
...............................................................�..............
LANDOWNER ADDRESS � .. Print) TELEPHONE#CELL
.................................................................._....................................................
°�..
LESSEE OR RENTER NAME(Please PriJ.nts TELEPHONE# HOME E
_....._. _..... ..... ......
LESSEE OR ii NT ADDRESS (Please Prints_ TELEPHONE# CELL
_... ..� --- ... ...._................_.............. ......... ......
__
R: P r✓,(..C '' �.. r Cf
F::. ..! r
FARM NUMBERS}AND TRACT NUMBERS) FOR PORTION OF LEASED OR RENTED PROPERTY UNDER
PROPERTY CONTROL OF LESSEME NTER: such as field numbers,
all -
_ ,z fy `
LEASE OR RENTA. .._...... ......... ......... ........- ...--.... ..�.. ... _
I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE REFERENCED LESSEE OR RENTER HAS CONTROL OF THE LAND DESCRIBED ABOVE
AND FF f BEING OFFERED FOR THE EQIP/WHIP CSP FOR THE INCLUSIVE DATES AS INDICATED ABOVE
SIGNATURE OF LESSEE OR RENTER DATE
SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER DATE
l5' a
"The U.S- Department of Agriculture(USDA)prohibits discrimination in all of its programs and activities on the basis of race. color, national origin, age, disability, and
where applicable. sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, political beliefs genetic information, reprisal, or because all or part of an
individual's income Is derived from any public assistance program. ('Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabil'ties who require alternative means
for communication of program information(Braille, large print, audiotape,etc,)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice and TDD)." To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to USDA. Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Stop 9410. Washington DC 20250-9410 or call toll-free at [phone] (English)or(600)877-8339 (TDD)or(866)377-8642 fEr,glish Federai-relay)or(800)845-
6136 (Spanish Federal-relay). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Vem above statements are made in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 522a). Furnishing this information is voluntary; however, failure to furnish correct,
plete information will result in the withholding or withdrawal of such technical or financial assistance.The information may be furnished to other USDA agencies, the
al Revenue Service. the Department of Justice or other Stale or Federal law enforcement agencies, or in response to orders of a court, magistrate, or administratiae
tribunal.

usDA /� NC-PGM-1
vJ N R March 2011
two
lJnfted States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resourc`191 esConservatin:�Servicr
CONTROL OF THE LAND FOR THECONTRACT PERIOD
i
The purpose of this document is to provide conservation program applicants with written documentation that they
control the land to be offered for the entire length of the contract period. This form is to be used for parcels of land
that are not owned by the applicant where a verbal rent or lease arrangement may exist. NOTE Formal written lease
agreements may be substituted for this form.
LANDOWNER NAME­i(Pleaserint) _ _...._ TELEPHONE# HOME
Lc }'?r?t`....................................................................._........-_.......----......-- -5 6,- 5 7�_. 3 a !
LANDOWNER ADD S'(Please Print) TELEPHONE# CELL
6
..... .......... ............. ..._........._........ ............ _.........
LESSEE OR RENTER NAME(Please Print) - _ TELEPHONE# HOME
LESSEE OR RENTER ADDRESS_(Aease Print) _ TELEPHONE# CELL
FARM NUMBER(S) AND TRACT NUMBER(S) FOR PORTION OF LEASED OR RENTED PROPERTY UNDER
,PROPERTY CONTROL OF LESSEEIRENTER such as field numbers,
-all cropland, etc.
LEASE OR RENTAL PERIOD START DATE LEASE OR RENTAL PERIOD END DATE
T t `-2-
I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE REFERENCED LESSEE OR RENTER HAS CONTROL OF THE LAND DESCRIBED ABOVE
AND_BEING_OFFERED FOR THE EQIP/WH_IPICSP FOR THE INCLUSIVE DATES AS INDICATED ABOVE.
5IGTURE OF LESSEE-OR RENTER DATE
—Ai
v
SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER _ DATE
L Zz.) Z
"The U S. Depr€rtment of Agriculture:{US[JA?prc>lribit�;;t,y;f;ri nmahon in all of its programs and activities On the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and
where applicable, sex, marital status amii€al sl,-ttus ',)X ntal status, religion. sexual orientation political beliefs, genetic information, reprisal. or because all or part of an
nd€vidual's income is derived from arty poinkc ass€sla v.e program (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabifities who require alternative means
for COmrnun€cation of program information Mraille large punt aud€otape etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice and MD)," To file a
COmplamt of[tisCr,rnination write tcs USDA Ass+staru ',LA-,c retary for Civil Rights. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W..
Slop 94 I 0 Vdashington DC 29250-9410 o coll lol[-frf;=at f866)632-9992 (English)or(800)877-8339 JDD)or(B66)377-8642 (English Federal-relay)or(800)845-
6136 (Spanisi) Federal-relay) USDA i6 an equal oppert.rr:ty provider and employer.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Alft abov stalemen m ts are ad( t€n accordance w€ )c-P v rcy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 522a) Furnishing th€s information is valuntary. however, failure to furnish correct,
pl Eete:7fn rrtat on .v Ili' strlt ,r the vi'ht r}€d:nc tt,iraw3l of such technical or financial assistance. The information may be furnished to ocher USDA agencies, the
ernal Revpn,fe Swv ne. ih{5 Depwtme{rt at Jtrst c€ or other State or Federal law enforcement agenc€es, or in response to orders of a court, magistrate, or administrative
tribunal.

u'DAo N RCS NC -,
March 2011
United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resource,(:onset vatu rci'i Vick
CONTROL OFT HE LAND FOR THE CONTRACT PERIOD
The purpose of this document is to provide conservation program applicants with written documentation that they
control the land to be offered for the entire length of the contract period. This form is to be used for parcels of land
that are not owned by the applicant where a verbal rent or lease arrangement may exist. NOTE Formal written lease
agreements may be substituted for this form.
LANDOWNER NAME(Please Print) TELEPHONE# HOME
ADDS Please Print � - �
LANDOWNER� �: �.�..:....._ TELEPHONE# CE1.i.LL-�.c. S
r
r !` 't
LESSEE OR RENTER NAME(Please Print TELEPHONE# HOME
LESSEE OR RENTER ADDRESS Print) TELEPHONE# CELL
1 � i�� � , L,,�, t �� _�• �� � l
FARM NUMBER(S) AND TRACT NUMBER(S) FOR PORTION OF LEASED OR RENTED PROPERTY UNDER
PROPERTY CONTROL OF LESSEURENTE R such as field numbers,
110 - all cropland, etc.
_
LEASE OR REI ITAL PERIOD START DATE LEASE OR RENTAL PERIOD END DATE
I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE REFERENCED LESSEE OR REINTER HAS CONTROL OF THE LAND DESCRIBED ABOVE
AND BEING OFFERED FOR THE EQIP!WHIP/CSP FOR THE INCLUSIVE DATES AS INDICATED ABOVE
SIGNATURE aF LESSEE OR RBVT E-R __ _. DATE
-SIGNAIrDREu LAN DOW DATE
"The U�S Oopiimert .;if A�ric ii°Lire(I IS)Al pfrih,hil discrimination in all of its programs and activities,nn the basis of race, color- national origin,age,disability, and
where applwobir- scv inaraa!Stafias f-nr,rrlial statiis parental status, religion, sexual orientation, political beliefs, genetic information, reprisal,or because all or part of an
individual,r,incorrrea'ran derivrsy°fro.--r array prim€r_ptss-stancr program (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)Persons with disabilities who require alternative means
for conarn;ictca=.ion of r}rofirri rt Irfermat€pn fr,,ai[le 1oigte Orin€,audiofape, etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202)72C-2600 (voice and TDD)." To file a
complain' of discninwn ilioti write to;f,; rn A�";iM3nr Secretary for civil Rights, Office of the Assistant secretary for Civil Rights, 14CO Independence Avenue, S.W
Strait 94 1 Washsn{,tloir 0C.202f 0-94`r-err cid!loll-lies at i8i C32-9992 (English)or(BC0)87748339(TDD)or(866)377-8642 (English Federal-relay)or(809)845-
6 f35 +;Spanish Fikernnl-realayF USDA �,i;nx vturwy provide:and employer,
MVACY ACT STATEMENT
ahnvf,statemer s are r,)ade rr the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U-S C 522a) furnishing this information is voluntary, however, failure to furnish correct,
iplele infprmali>r will rest f n the,vilhh(,+1i. withdrawal of such technical or financial assistance. The information may be furnished to other USDA agencies, the
ernai R venue Sei cn ;he_F),paI 1p1t nt n'Ji;s r e or clher State or Federal law enforcement agencies or in response to orders of a court, magistrate, or administrative
tribunal

"'IDA -1
� QRCS March 2011 United States Department of Agriculture
Ni 1ur53 Ro,,ou rC CS(on w,v,1!:on Sorvi,,,
• CONTROL OF THE LAND FOR THE CONTRACT PERIOD
The purpose of this document is to provide conservation program applicants with written documentation that they
control the land to be offered for the entire lenath of the contract period. This form is to be used for parcels of land
that are not owned by the applicant where a vc-ibal rent or lease arrangement may exist. NOTE Formal written lease
agreements may be substituted for this form.
LANDOWNER NAME(Please Print) TELEPHONE# HOME
- - - -
------
LANDOWNER (Please Print) - -TELEPHONE# CELL T_ .... _.._ __ __._. - — - - ----
67Z 2. r^ ...
LESSEE OR RENTER NAME(Please Print) TELEPHONE# HOME j
--
LESSEE OR RENTER WDDRESS (Please Print) TELEPHONE# CELL-------
.
` .
Al
FARM NUMBER(S) AND TRACT NUMBER(S) FOR PORTION OF LEASED OR RENTED PROPERTY UNDER
PROPERTY CONTROL OF LESSEEJRENTE , such as field numbers,
all cropland, etc.
'Z/
LEASE OR RENTAL PERIOD START DATE LEASE OR RENTAL PERIOD END DATE
-- - ._
I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE REFERENCED LESSEE OR RENTER HAS CONTROL OF THE LAND DESCRIBED ABOVE
AND BEING OFFERED FOR THE EQIPiWHIP/CSP FOR THE INCLUSIVE DATES AS INDICATED ABOVE.
SIGNATURE OF LESSEE OR RENTER - ---- DATE
SIGNATUREF LANDOWNER _-_ __. DATE
"The E 1 Ag .,,,Jt re'J r",1sx;t=r; d-s-.rima nation in all of its programs and activities on the basis of race color, national origin,age, disability, and
Whore al;;[ .i;le sc` rna it�r[ -;<<`a s, r:li 3 .I! ; f:ar ^fol status religion, sexual orientation, political beliefs, genetic information, reprisal, or because alf or part of an
rn{iivi irra3 5 inn ome ienvc;d frog i;a.ry program. (NDt all prohibited hases apply to all programs.)Persons with disabilities who require alternative means
tGr cc.nl>,,.,l' it on , nrc;,'a onn:at ;(sra IN pr,nt audvapc,, etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone](voice and TDD)" To file a
tan I:rair:l ,r ,flu 3 s, ,. .c; l),1'---)A for Civil nights, Office of the Assis`.ant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 InciependenceAvertue, S.VV.,
Stop 94"[ L?:;!it r,:.rr, a.f'_: 0 r.: , t':l,- al (B56)632-9892 (Lnglishj or(c^07j 6 7-8339 (TDD)or(866)377-8642 (English Federal-relay)or(800)845-
r 1 (4T,:r i; f .. .3 .3„y> E J MA i f3tunity Provider and employer
FRVAC,Y ACTT STAIEMI N1
AM
r t -v, -`,r 1r 'i iNi,F' a y A,,! of 1974 (5 U.S.G. 522a) Furnishing this information is vafuntary, however, failure to furnish correct,IL h=[e rif r !tlr, vii i sal ' ore rat of such technical or financial assistance The information may be furnished to other USDA agencies, the
ern i ftt.,nu,.;3+ .rz 'rrr ,r()thf r 8.,a a or Federal law enforcernent acts cieS, or in response to orders of a court. magistrate, or administrative
lrib,En«3

NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Chatham 8/14/2018 3:46:10 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: woody
Tract Number: 30637
Field Number: 1
Soil Series: GeB2 : Georgeville silty clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Crop: Fescue (Hay)
BMPs: Buffer Width Width = 20 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58' lb
Application Method: Incorporated-4 wks or less
following application
Soil Loss: 4 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 294
WV Factor (USER) .82
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 57
SS 'UBLE P = 4
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 0
TOTAL P RATING = 61 (HIGH)
•

NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Chatham 8/14/2018 3:49:23 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: woody
Tract Number: 30637
Field Number: 2
Soil Series: NaB: Nanford-Badin complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Hay) .
BMPs: Buffer Width Width = 20 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-4 wks or less
following application
Soil Loss: 4 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50--99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 318
WV_Factor (USER) . 82
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P - 27
SOLUBLE P = 5
OCHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 0
TOTAL P RATING = 32 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Chatham 8/14/2018 3:54: 37 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: woody
Tract Number: 30637
Field Number: 3
Soil. Series: NaC: Nanford-Badin complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Hay) :
BMPs: Buffer Width Width = 20 ft.
Fertilizers : Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-4 wks or less
following application
Soil Loss : 4 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 304
WV Factor (USER) . 82
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 26
SOLUBLE P = 5
CHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 0
TOTAL P RATING = 31 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Chatham 8/14/2018 3:57: 02 PM
•
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: woody
Tract Number: 30637 ,
Field Number: 4
Soil Series: GaC: Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Hay) :
BMPs: Buffer Width Width = 20 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 .lb
Application Method: Incorporated-4 irks or less
following application
Soil Loss: 4 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 296
WV Factor (USER) . 82
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 22
SOLUBLE P - 4
WCHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 0
TOTAL P RATING = 26 (MEDIUM)
I
I
I

NCANAT Version: 2 . 02
PLAT Results For: Chatham 8/14/2018 4:00:07 PM
•
INPUTS
Calendar. Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: moody
Tract Number: 30637
Field Number: 5 '
Soil Series: NaB: Nanford-Badin complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Hay) :
BMPs; Buffer Width Width = 20 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P205: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-4 mks or less
following application
Soil boss: 4 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 30-49 ft
Soil. Test 0" - 4" 239
WV—Factor (USER) .91
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P W 21
SOLUBLE P = 3
OCHATE P - 0
SOURCE P w 0
TOTAL P RATING = 24 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 2. 02
PLAT Results For: Chatham 8/14/2018 4 :03:13 PM
•
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: woody
Tract Number: 30637
Field Number: 6
Soil Series: GoC: Goldston-Kadin complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Hay) :
BMPs: Buffer Width Width = 20 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-Lagoon liquid
Yearly Applied Amount: 1 ac in
Lb P2O5: 77.58 lb
Application Method: Incorporated-4 wks or less
following application
Soil Loss: 4 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 246
SPIV Factor (USER) .91
Soil Test 28" - 32" 0
WV Factor (DATABASE) 1 . 1
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
TICULATE P = 4
SOLUBLE P = 28
LEACHATE P 0
SOURCE P = 0
TOTAL P RATING = 32 (MEDIUM)
i

Phosphorus Loss Assessment Tool Completion
-• Name of Facility:T�;��� Facility Number:
Owner(s)Name: 1�&V/y 4j lvled (A T _ Phone No:;�Fd"- � jf
Mailing Address: S'f5''�li�tx':��o ,��% �/,%/�C�'�, ICJ �a•�!J � 2 7
Check the appropriate box below, and sign at the bottom:
XNo fields received a high or very high rating.
❑ Yes, the fields listed below received a high or very high rating:
Field Number Size (Acres) Rating (High or Very High)
Please use as many additional attachment forms (PLAT-A-12-15-05) as needed for additional fields.
• By completing the above section and any additional attachments and by signing this form, the facility
owner and Technical Specialist acknowledge all application fields were evaluated using the Phosphorus
Loss Assessment Tool. All necessary calculations were completed to conduct the Assessment. A copy will
be kept on site with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. Any future modifications must be
approved by a technical specialist and filed With the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. Waste plans with fields having a high or very high rating will have to be modified to
address phosphorus loss by the next permit cycle beginning July, 2007.
Owner Name:
Owner Signature: Date: Z
Technical Specialist Name: I 1 �ilel
Technical Specialist Signature: Date: /-If
Affiliation: Gi!'IC C' Phone No:
Submit this form to:
NC Division of Water Resources
Aquifer Protection Section
• Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
PLAT-12-15-05

• NCANAT version: 2.02 HR2.txt
PLAT Results For: Alamance 3/19/2015 3:06:32 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Alamance
Producer Identifier: H woody
Tract Number: 2
Field Number: HR2
Soil series: Gac2: Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes,
eroded
Crop: Fescue (Pasture)
BMPs: Buffer width width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 33.48 ton
Lb P205: 4. 54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss: 2.9 t/ac/yr
Receiving slope Distance 20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 267
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
Hydrologic condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 9
SOLUBLE P = 2
LEACHATE P 0
SOURCE P — 8
TOTAL P RATING = 19 (LOW)
Page 1

HR1.tXt
NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Alamance 3/19/2015 3:04:54 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Alamance
Producer identifier: H woody
Tract Number: 2
Field Number: HR1
soil Series: Gac2: Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes,
eroded
Crop: sorghum Sudan (Hay)
BMPs: Buffer width width = 100 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 32.14 ton
Lb P205: 4. 54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil LOSS: 1.1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 150-199 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 123
WV-Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
Hydrologic condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 1
SOLUBLE P - 1
LEACHATE P - 0
SOURCE P = 7
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)
Page 1

Hw4.txt
NCANAT version: 2.02
iPLAT Results For: Alamance 3/19/2015 2:51:41 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Alamance
Producer Identifier: H woody
Tract Number: 1
Field Number: HW4
Soil Series: GaC2: Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes,
eroded
crop: sorghum Sudan (Hay)
BMPs: Buffer width width = 70 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 20.09 ton
Lb P2o5: 4. 54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Lass: 1.8 t/ac/yr
Receiving slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 246
WV_Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 4
SOLUBLE P = 2
LEACHATE P 0
SOURCE P = 4
TOTAL P RATING = 10 (LOW)
Page 1

MW3.txt
NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Alamance 3/19/2015 2:49:09 PM
INPUTS
calendar Year: 2015
county: Alamance
Producer Identifier: H woody
Tract Number: 1
Field Number: HW3
Soil series: GaC2: Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes,
eroded
Crop: sorghum Sudan (Hay)
BMPS: Buffer width width = 70 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 20.09 ton
Lb P205: 4. 54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss: 2.4 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 314
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
Hydrologic condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 7
SOLUBLE P = 3
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 4
TOTAL P RATING = 14 (LOW)
® Page 1

Hw2.txt
NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Alamance 2/25/2015 4:18:23 PM
INPUTS
calendar Year: 2015
county: Alamance
Producer Identifier: H. woody
Tract Number: 1
Field Number: Hw2
soil series: GaB2: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes,
eroded
Crop: Sorghum Sudan (Hay)
BMPs: Buffer width width = 100 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 21.7 ton
Lb P205: 4. 54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss: 1.4 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 224
WV_Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 2
SOLUBLE P = 2
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 5
TOTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)
Page 1

HW1.txt
NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Alamance 2/25/2015 4:16:23 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Alamance
Producer Identifier: H. woody
Tract Number: 1
Field Number: Nw1
soil series: HdB2: Herndon silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
Crop: Sorghum Sudan (Hay) :
BMPS: Buffer width width = 100 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 21.7 ton
Lb P2o5: 4.54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil LOSS: 0.87 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 236
WV_Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
Hydrologic condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 1
SOLUBLE P = 2
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 5
TOTAL P RATING - 8 (LOW)
Page 1

M.txt
• NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Chatham 3/20/2015 1: 56:08 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: H woody
Tract Number: 4
Field Number: Jw3
Soil Series: GeB2: Georgeville silty clay loam, 2 to 6 percent
slopes, moderately eroded
Crop: Fescue (Hay)
BMPS: Buffer width width = 70 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 31.92 ton
Lb P205: 4.54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss: 0.17 t/ac/yr
Receiving slope Distance 0-9 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 133
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 1
SOLUBLE P = 2
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 12 (LOW)
Page 1 r

7w2.txt
NCANAT Version: 2.02
IS PLAT Results For: Chatham 3/20/2015 1: 54:45 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: H woody
Tract Number: 4
Field Number: jw2
soil Series: GeB2: Georgeville silty clay loam, 2 to 6 percent
slopes, moderately eroded
Crop: Fescue (Hay)
BMPS: Buffer width width = 100 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy--scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 35.49 ton
Lb P2o5: 4.54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil LOSS: 0.07 t/ac/yr
Receiving slope Distance 0--9 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 143
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
Hydrologic condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
• SOLUBLE P — 2
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 10
TOTAL P RATING = 12 (LOW)
• Page 1

JW1.txt
® NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Chatham 3/20/2015 1: 51:44 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer identifier: H woody
Tract Number: 4
Field Number: 3W1
Soil series: Nac: Nanford-Badin complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Hay) :
BMPS: Buffer width width = 30 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 29.69 ton
Lb P2o5: 4.54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss: 0.099 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 30-49 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 143
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 2
LEACHATE P — 0
SOURCE P = 9
TOTAL P RATING = 11 (LOW)
Page 1

EL4.txt
4 NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Chatham 3/20/2015 11:17:30 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: H woody
Tract Number: 3
Field Number: EL4
soil series: NaC: Nanford-Badin complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Hay) :
BMPS: Buffer width width = 30 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 39.73 ton
Lb P205: 4.54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Lass: 0.11 t/ac/yr
Receiving slope Distance 0-9 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 180
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
Hydrologic condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 2
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 11
TOTAL P RATING 13 (LOW)
Page 1

EL3.txt
. NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Chatham 3/20/2015 11:16:22 AM
INPUTS
calendar Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: H woody
Tract Number: 3
Field Number: EL3
soil Series: NaC: Nanford-Kadin complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes
crop: Fescue (Hay) :
BMPs: Buffer width width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 39.73 ton
Lb P205: 4. 54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss: 0.087 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 0-9 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 180
WV_FaCtor (DATABASE) 1.1
Hydrologic condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
• SOLUBLE P — 2
LEACHATE P — 0
SOURCE P = 11
TOTAL P RATING = 13 (LOW)
• Page 1

EL2.txt
NCANAT version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Chatham 3/20/2015 11:14:42 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer identifier: H woody
Tract Number: 3
Field Number: EL2
soil series: CmB: Cid-Lignum complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Hay) :
BMPs: Buffer width width = 30 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 42.63 ton
Lb P2o5: 4.54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss: 0.13 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 30-49 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 210
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
• SOLUBLE P = 14
LEACHATE P - 0
SOURCE P = 29
TOTAL P RATING = 43 (MEDIUM)
. Page 1

ELL txt
NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Chatham 3/20/2015 11:12:42 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2015
County: Chatham
Producer identifier: H Woody
Tract Number: 3
Field Number: EL1
soil Series: NaB: Nanford--Badin complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Hay) :
BMPS: Buffer width width = 70 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 42.63 ton
Lb P205: 4.54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil LOSS: 0.066 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 20-29 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 210
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1.1
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
• SOLUBLE P — 2
LEACHATE P — 0
SOURCE P — 12
TOTAL P RATING = 14 (LOW)
• Page 1

F2.txt
NCANAT Version: 2.42
PLAT Results For: Alamance 3/19/2015 4:37:50 PM
INPUTS
calendar Year: 2015
County: Alamance
Producer Identifier: H Woody
Tract Number: 2410
Field Number: F2
Soil series: AaB: Alamance silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
(Callison)
Crop: Fescue (Hay) :
BMPS: Buffer width width = 30 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 42.63 ton
Lb P205: 4. 54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Sail Loss: 0.059 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 252
WV_Factor (DATABASE) 1.2
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P — 5
LEACHATE P — 0
SOURCE P = 23
TOTAL P RATING = 2$ (MEDIUM)
Page 1

F1.txt
NCANAT Version: 2.02
PLAT Results For: Alamance 3/19/2015 4:34:42 PM
INPUTS
calendar Year: 2015
county: Alamance
Producer Identifier: H woody
Tract Number: 2410
Field Number: F1
Soil series: AaB: Alamance silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
(Callison)
crop: Fescue (Hay)
BMPS: Buffer width width = 100 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-scraped
Yearly Applied Amount: 42.63 ton
Lb P205: 4. 54 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss: 0.058 t/ac/yr
Receiving slope Distance 50-99 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 252
WV—Factor (DATABASE) 1.2
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P - 0
SOLUBLE P 5
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 23
TOTAL P RATING = 28 (MEDIUM)
Page 1

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
STORMWATER STORAGE POND AND DAM FOR THE
TRIPLE W FARMS DAIRY IN ALAMANCE COUNTY, N.C.
Facility Number AWD10010
-Record Drawings and Final Construction Details ---
Prepared For: Mr. Harold Woody
C/o Triple W. Farms; Inc.
3545 East Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road
Snow Camp, N.C. 27349
Phone: [phone]
Report Prepared By: Larry F. Graham, P.E.
Environmental Engineering Services
P.O. Box 426
Aberdeen, N.C. 28315
• Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
Copy Of Report To: Melissa Rosebrock, Sr. Environmental Specialist
c/o NCDENR—Dept. Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston Salem, NC 27105 +�011usrrlitj,"
Phone: [phone]) OA�Ql�A,
i Or
SEAL •
c �
Construction Completion Date: November 17, 2015 i 11602
Report Completion Date: January 25 2016 +�''P�'� �� '�
C fication De lbpm nt and Review By:
Larry F. Graham, P.E.
N. Veg' i tration umber 11602
ODate of Review: S U
1

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
r
• TABLE OF CONTENTS
BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION.................................................................................5
VICINITYDETAILS................................................................................................................6
SiteLocation............................................................................
Topographyand Drainage................................................................................................................... 6
FARM STATISTICS AND INFORMATION ............................................................................7
Animal Waste Related Set-Backs or Buffers......................................................................................7
Miscellaneous Project Details.............................................................................................................7
Animal Populations and Related Information.....................................................................................7
EVALUATION OF THE AS-CONSTRUCTED WASTE STORAGE POND .............................8
WasteStorage Pond Location............................................................................................................. 8
DescriptionOf Treatment................................................................................................................... 8
Impoundment Shapes and Flows........................................................................................................ 9
SludgeHolding Capacity.................................................................................................................... 9
Design Treatment Volume.................................................................................................................. 9
Wastewater And Rainfall Storage Volumes....................................................................................... 9
NormalFreeboard - Totals................................................................................................................ 10
EmergencyFreeboard ....................................................................................................................... I I
High Water Markers For The New Pond................................................
Emergency Spillway Construction.................................................................................................... I I
New Waste Storage Pond Volumetric Summary.............................................................................. 12
POND EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION DETAILS...........................................................13
NewDike Construction .................................................................................................................... 13
Stormwater Management During Construction................................................................................ 14
Drainage Tile Inspection and Repairs............................................................................................... 14
Grass Planting And Soil Stabilization On The Dike......................................................................... 14
Canals and Grass Waterway Channels.... ...................................................................................... 15
LONG TERM MAINTENANCE OF THE DIKE.....................................................................15
CONTROL PROGRAMS .......................................................................................................15
STORAGE POND MANURE MAINTENANCE......................................................................15
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS AROUND LAGOONS AND WASTE STORAGE PONDS.......16
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN FOR WASTE STORAGE STRUCTURES ............................18
• ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND NOTICES...................................................................18
2

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructer!Details,January 2016
r
EXHIBIT LIST
Exhibit 1. County road map (vicinity map).
Exhibit 2. Volume vs. depth graph of the modified waste storage pond.
Exhibit 3. Geophysical soil test data—preconstruction soil analyses.
Exhibit 4. Geophysical soil test data—compaction tests of soils during dam construction.
Exhibit S. Emergency Action Plan for animal waste discharges.
Exhibit 6. Emergency Action Plan for a dam breach.
Exhibit 7. Odor Control Plan for Triple W. Farms.
Exhibit 8. Insect Control Plan for Triple W. Farms.
Exhibit 9. Mortality Management Plan for Triple W. Farms.
DRAWING LIST
• Drawing TWF-AB 2.0 New pond and dam construction details (EES drawing).
-b
r
3

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
t
ADVISORY
The material contained in this package was developed specifically
for the named client on the title page. This material shall not be
copied by private individuals for personal use or distribution. Only
persons authorized by the client should copy or reproduce the
material within this report. Regulatory officials may however copy
and/or distribute this document according to departmental policy and
according to the laws of the State of North Carolina.
4

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
STORMWATER STORAGE POND AND DAMTOR THE TRIPLE W FARMS DAIRY
IN ALAMANCE COUNTY, N.C.
--- Record Drawings and Final Construction Details ---
BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION
Triple W. Farms, Inc. (TWF) is a well established Alamance County dairy near the Eli Whitney
community. The farm is registered with the NCDENR, Division of Water Resources (DWR) Permit
Number AWD10010. Mr. Harold Woody is the landowner where the new stormwater storage pond has
been constructed.
1_ TWF has been working on animal waste management improvements for a number of years. TWF
scrapes most of their dairy waste from animals in confinement and land applies this waste using a
manure spreader. A dry stack was built at the farm in 2011. This dry stack serves to store most of
the scraped manure until it can be land applied via a manure spreader.
2. Due to the configuration of the milking parlor, freestall barn and cow herding corridors, some
stormwater runoff washes manure off concrete floors and migrates toward a nearby stream. TWF
also has cattle feedlots where the stormwater runoff directly impacts the nearby stream.
3. In 2013 Environmental Engineering Services (EES) designed and submitted a plan for a new
stormwater containment pond at the farm. The purpose of this pond was to collect rainwater runoff
from some of the uncovered animal confinement areas as well as out-of-door feed lots and prevent
this manure impacted water from flowing directly into nearby streams. Water captured and
impounded can then be land applied onto crop land as needed at or below agronomic rates.
4. Construction on this pond began in 2013 but due to an extremely wet few years and the nature of the
pond to capture stormwater, pond construction was not completed until 2015. This pond evaluation
is for a 300 cow dairy even though the existing herd size is less than 300.
5. The Alamance Soil and Water Conservation District has been assisting TWF to develop a
Comprehensive Animal Waste Management Plan, including the nutrient management. Plans are to
use the scraped manure and the stormwater pond liquids for land application. EES has not been
directly involved with the land application or nutrient management aspects of the farm's animal
waste management.
6. Originally EES was going to design an irrigation system for the captured stormwater, but Mr. Woody
has decided to utilize a pump and haul program for stored water management. Irrigation may be
utilized in the future, but not as of this report.
7. This document records the as-constructed volumes and as-built details associated with the new pond
and dam. The reader can see the original EES design document to obtain proposed design
information.
$. The reader should understand that the volumetric predictions, days of storage, etc. are only estimates
and not exact "to-the-inch" values. Given the possible fluctuation in out-of-doors animal waste
5

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
management systems, seasonal variations, management changes, etc. - using such approximations
should be adequate for long term pond management.
9. The fanner/manager should not exceed the minimum or maximum recommendations for volume
capacity mentioned in this report so as not to violate the intent of the existing animal waste rules.
Each intensive animal operation and facility operates differently and must be evaluated on its own
merit and the owner/operator's willingness to maintain best management practices or BMP's. It will
be completely up to the farmer and/or system(s) operator to manage the system in accordance with
these plans, to protect the surface water and groundwater of the State of North Carolina, and to
adhere to all rules and regulations related to animal waste utilization.
10. The specifications within this document are intended to verify that the new waste storage facility and
earthen dike were constructed in accordance with the EES developed plans. Details about waste
storage and construction will be given along with a drawing of the new pond contours. Said drawing
is enclosed with this package and is labeled Sheet TWF-AB 2.0.
11. The specifications within this document are acceptable to satisfy a portion of the animal waste
management rules found in the publication titled NCDENR, Division of Environmental Water
Quality, Title 15A: Subchapter 2T, Section .1300. Refer to this publication for regulatory details.
12. The evaluation methodology and component comparison contained in this document will follow
design guidelines found in the U.S. Natural Resources Conversation Service (MRCS) technical
guidelines when applicable; and are not intended to contradict standard NRCS guidelines or the
design criteria of other organizations. Much of the information in this document was obtained
courtesy of the N.C. Cooperative Extension Service.
13. For background the reader may also refer to the original EES design documentation dated April 23,
2013 for background. Much of the original information in that document will not be repeated herein
for brevity. This evaluation is for a 300 cow dairy even though the existing herd size is less than
300.
VICINITY DETAILS
Site Location
The physical location of the proposed TWF pond and dam is in the southeastern corner of Alamance
County approximately lb miles northwest of Pittsboro, N.C. Exhibit 1 shows a vicinity map of the
property.
The TWF property is bordered by mostly farm land and a few residences in a rural setting. There were
no historical sites noted within 1 mile of this pond.
Coordinates for the farm are approximately Longitude 79 degrees, 19 minutes, 5 seconds; Latitude 35
degrees, 54 minutes, 23 seconds.
Topography and Drainage
In general, the topography at and around the TWF dairy consists of rolling hills with all of the drainage
from the site eventually going to Mary's Creek and then into the Haw River. A USGS topographic map
• of the area can be seen as Exhibit 2 of the original EES design package. The USGS topographic map
containing this information is the Saxapahaw Quadrangle map (1980).
6

Triple W.farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Nlai Is,January 2016
r
FARM STATISTICS AND INFORMATION
Animal Waste Related Set-Backs or Buffers
There are numerous regulations related to set-backs and buffers from intensive livestock operations.
Most of the more stringent set-backs relate to swine production and swine waste. Unfortunately set-back
values are often subject to interpretation since they are date dependent.
See the 4/23/13 EES design document for additional details and tables of set-backs based on the 2T
regulations.
Miscellaneous Project Details
A pre-construction meeting was held between the engineer, the farm owner, the earth moving contractor
on May 2, 2013. The engineer, earth moving contractor, and the farm owner kept a close watch on the
dike construction for quality control. The contractor made every effort to follow the design
specifications as called for in the original EES plans. Numerous meetings were held between the
contractor, farmer, and engineer as the pond was being constructed.
During pond construction, the engineer made numerous visits to the site to check on construction
methodology, sizing, etc. During construction the engineer did not observe any unusual natural or
archeological features. No endangered or threatened wildlife species were noted. Nor did the contractor
• report any such findings.
There were no wetlands disturbed while modifying this pond.
The earth moving firm that performed the pond and dike modifications was D.L. Thomas & Sons
Construction, Inc. at 1915 Pete Thomas Road, Pittsboro, NC 27312. Their telephone number is 919-542-
7742. The company contact person was Mr. Donnie Thomas.
Selected sediment and erosion control measures were implemented on this site as construction began.
Sediment was contained on the property throughout construction. Once soil disturbances were completed
the site was mulched and seeded.
The reader should refer to the original EES design package to review safety tips and design details
associated with waste storage ponds and animal waste. Said details are not being repeated in this report
for brevity.
Animal Populations and Related Information
For reference, Table 1 shows the maximum number of bovine scheduled to be housed at the TWF
according to the original pond design information. Since most of the animal waste at the farm is in solid
form. Only a small amount of manure ends up in the stormwater containment pond.
Design values for dairy manure production were taken from the NRCS technical guide 633. Table I
shows the number of animals to be housed at the facility and the estimated amount of animal waste
going to the storage pond and how much will be stored as solids (not contained in the pond). Table 1
assumes animal waste contributions will be linear, but let it be known that liquid additions and
subtractions are not linear.
7

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
r
The reader should also note that EES has not made any,attempt to compute the nutrient loading from
solid or liquid manure sources stored in the new stonnwater pond. EES is only discussing the physical
design of the structure and its estimated volumetric storage potential. Nutrient loadings and land
application amounts are to be derived by others and presented as part of the nutrient management
program.
TABLE 1
ESTIMATED ANIMAL WASTE STORAGE NEEDS FOR THE CONFINED ANIMALS
Animal Type Number Of Cubic Feet Of Solid Cubic Feet Of Liquid Total Cubic Total Gallons
According To Animals In Waste Produced Per Waste Produced Per Feet Of Liquid Of Liquid
CAWMP CAWMP Year That Is Year Stored In The Waste Waste
Collectable** New Pond '** Produced Per Produced Per
Month Month
Milk Cows In 300 291,375 58,556 4,880 36,502
Confinement
Dry Cows In l0 10,360 0 0 0
Confinement
Heifers In 39 28,860 0 0 0
Confinement
Calves In 45 11,610 0 0 0
Confinement
Total ***** 342,205 58,556 4,880 36,502
* Design values were obtained from the NRCS Tech Guide 633 from the Dairy Paved Surface Scraped Manure Spreadsheet.
Values include all manure from animals,milking center wastewater, and rainfall failing directly onto the pond surface. Values
. do not include surface run-in or water for flushing.
** These values are based on the amount of time the farmer estimated animals were confined and not on pasture. Collectable
manure means manures that can be gathered for land application. At TWF the manure shown in this column is a solid waste.
*** This value is primarily milking parlor waste. 4 gallons per milk cow per day is the value used for farms milking herds of
150 cows or more. Only the liquid amount is considered for storage inside the pond.
EVALUATION OF THE AS-CONSTRUCTED WASTE STORAGE POND
Waste Storage Pond Location
The new earthen dam and the new stormwaterlwaste storage pond were installed in more or less the
same location as specified in the original EES specifications. Sheet TWF-AB 2.0 shows a drawing of
the as-constructed dam and pond.
Description Of Treatment
Animal waste storage ponds are structures or impoundments that are used to temporarily store liquid
and/or slurry type wastes. They lack the volume necessary to maintain optimum anaerobic activity;
therefore they are not considered treatment structures. A waste storage pond must contain and store
excess animal waste and storm volumes so as to provide the farmer flexibility in his/her waste utilization
plan and safety against overflow. Unlike lagoons, waste storage ponds can be pumped dry or almost dry.
The new TWF structure will be used as a rainwater storage pond with a small manure component.
8

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
r
Impoundment Shapes and Flows
The general shape of the new pond more or less follows the proposed shape of the original design
document.
Sludge Holding Capacity
While this pond is not specifically designed to accept manure solids, bedding, or sand -- a limited
amount of solids will buildup in this waste holding pond since it will be intercepting stormwater flows.
Allowing storage volume for solids accumulation was not needed for this pond. That said - if the
farmer decides to allow a small amount of solids to flow into the holding pond, the solids will take up a
little of the liquid volume. EES assumed the solids storage volume in the pond is negligible.
Design Treatment Volume
There is no Minimum Design Volume or Design Treatment Volume associated with this pond. The pond
can be pumped empty or almost empty if necessary.
Wastewater And Rainfall Storage Volumes
Dairy waste management systems accumulate water and animal waste over time due to excess water
produced by and for the animals as well as from excess rainfall. This is especially true for stormwater
containment structures. The days available for excess waste storage depend on the volume of waste
generated, added rainfall less evaporation, and the farmer's opportunities to empty the structure. The
traditional dairy waste holding pond must be large enough to store the excess water accumulation until it
can evaporate or be emptied via a land application routine.
The TWF pond was originally designed to have water removed via irrigation on a routine basis to help
manage pond water levels throughout the year. However the farm owner has decided to use a pump and
haul methodology to manage the pond water. It is anticipated that pump-outs will take place about 3 or
4 times per year. However, installing irrigation on this farm is an option later on.
The new TWF storage pond will receive rainfall run-in from the freestall barn area, barn roofs, silage
storage area, pond surface and sidewalls, and the milking parlor. The storage pond will contain a
manure component so it must be land applied according to the farmer's CAWMP. Agronomic plans
and waste application specifications are beyond the scope and purpose of this EES report.
At least a portion of the rain falling directly onto the pond surface is reported to already be added into
the NRCS waste accumulation values presented in Table 1, but since we are dealing with a stormwater
containment pond EES considered some extra rainfall onto the pond surface to err on the side of caution.
Over time rain water and milking parlor waste will add to the volume in the pond and evaporation and
pumping will remove water from the pond. This is a balance process that will always be changing.
Typically water will accumulate or rise in the winter months and decrease or fall in summer months.
During light rain events no run-off may make it to the pond at all because of soil absorption and micro
soil features. In general the formula for determining water volume inside the pond is as follows:
Liquid Storage Inside The Pond = [Rain Falling Onto Pond Surface (not already added into waste numbers)) +
[Surface Water Failing On The Pond's Immediate Watershed]-[Water Held By Localized Soil Absorption d Drainage
Area Surface Features]+ [Liquid and Solid Waste Produced By The Dairy (which includes routine rain falling onto
the pond surface)]-[Evaporation From The Pond]-[Water Removed Out Of The Pond].
9

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
r
A summary of the different volume contributions for this as-built pond appear in Table 2.
TABLE 2
ESTIMATED VOLUMETRIC SUMMARY FOR THE AS-BUILT STORMWATER
CONTAINMENT POND AT TRIPLE W FARM#
Parameter Design Value Discussion
Milking Parlor Waste 36,502 gallons 1 month Milking parlor only waste from 300 Milk Cows.
Total Drainage Area Into 8.71 Acres * This is total area based on the latest grading and stormwater
The Pond routing. Stormwater enters the pond via two different pipe
entrances. This includes the runoff from buildings,concrete
walkways,driveways,some asphalt highway,grassy surfaces, and
the feedlot. This does not include the pond surface area.
Pond Surface Area 1.7 Acres * This value includes the inner rim run-in.
25 Year—24 Hour Storm 6.0 Inches One 25 Year—24 Hour Storm for Chapel Hill Area
Rainfall
25 Year—24 Hour Storm 1,696,000 Gallons This is one 25 yr--24 hr storm falling on the drainage area and the
Storage Volume pond surface. This volume should be left in the pond for
emergency storage. This particular number ignores small amounts
of soil absorption and surface feature retention for safety reasons.
Heavy Storm Allowance NA Not applicable for a waste storage pond.
Available Liquid Storage 2,870,000 Gallons This is the working volume of the pond. Water levels should be
From The Pond Bottom kept within this range. The actual amount of storage available at
To The Start Pump Level any one time will depend on the starting volume.
Total Available Liquid 4,566,000 Gallons This is the total pond volume. The pond will contain water up to
Storage From The Pond this point, but additional water will cause a discharge out of the
Bottom To The emergency overflow channel. If water gets to this point it will
Emergency Overflow have used up the 24 Hour—25 Year storm reserve.
Invert
Days of Available 90 to 120 Days The days of available storage will depend on the time of year,
Storage Below The rainfall totals, pump out routines,etc. Shown here is a reasonable
Emergency Overflow planning range of storage days between pumping events from
Level—On Average considering pump out takes place via a pump and haul method.
Rainfall amounts beyond the average could cause fewer days of
storage to be available and drought periods may extend storage
days.
4 Precipitation and evaporation data was provided by NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2,Version 3 for Greensboro pump station 361089 N 79.769
W,plus US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau'Technical Paper number 40 titled"Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States".
Pond surface evaporation estimate is based on information from NOAA 'Technical Report NWS 34. This would be fresh water lake
evaporation. Use Greensboro values for PAN Evaporation.
* EES used aerial photographs and as-built topographic measurements around the proposed pond site in order to estimate drainage areas,
etc.
Normal Freeboard -Totals
Normal freeboard is the extra depth above the maximum "operating" high water level in a waste holding
structure. This extra depth (or extra storage volume) is a safety measure that allows for the storage of at
least one 25 year - 24 hour storm (described above). From the volume vs. depth graph in Exhibit 2, the
10

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
F
engineer has estimated that the single 25 year — 24 hour.storm mentioned above would occupy the top
4.75 feet(+1-) of liquid storage capacity of this basin. When possible the farmer should keep some extra
freeboard - above the 25 year—24 hour storm if the structure is sufficiently large to allow this reserve.
Normal Freeboard For First 25 Year- 24 Hoerr Storm = 4.75 Feet `� 7 1
Emergency Freeboard
Emergency freeboard is the extra depth added to a waste holding structure for safety against a random
embankment overflow or dam "over-topping". This extra depth is a safety measure and prevents water
from spilling over the dam, resulting in dam erosion and complete or partial failure. Emergency
freeboard is measured from the lowest portion of the pond rim to the invert of the emergency overflow.
The emergency freeboard was measured to be approximately 1.8 feet.
Emergency Freeboard = 1.8 Feet. 2l r F
High Water Markers For The New Pond
Permanent water level markers shall be installed inside all storage ponds, lagoons, or pump basins so the
operator can tell where the freeboard reserves begin. The farmer shall install these markers so the
operator can tell at a glance the current water level when water levels approach the "pump start" and
• "pump stop" levels. All waste storage pond water levels must be read and recorded weekly. This
measuring device should be well marked and be of a design which best serves the operator's purpose.
Triple W. Farms may use PVC pipe, a 4 in x 4 in. treated wooden pole (or similar non corrosive type
materials) to mount on the inside of the new basin, clearly marked at important levels. Applicable
"pump start" and "pump stop" levels are shown below in "fable 3. All poles or markers should be
graduated in 6 inch increments if possible and be made so that marks do not become unreadable due to
staining. See Exhibit 2 for a graph of the pond volume vs. depth.
TABLE 3
IMPORTANT WATER LEVELS INSIDE THE WASTE STORAGE POND AT TWF
START PUMPING BEFORE HERE STOP PUMPING AT LEAST BY HERE
POND ID FEET BELOW OVERFLOW FEET BELOW OVERFLOW)
Stormwater Storage 4.75 feet * It is acceptable to empty the basin
Pond
* Storage for one 25 Year - 24 Hour Storm is available between here and overflow. Water levels should always be kept
below this level,except in weather emergencies.
Emergency Spillway Construction
An earthen emergency spillway was installed in the northwest corner of the pond. It .is located on
undisturbed firm soil. The emergency overflow was designed to pass the flow from a 100 year - 1 hour
storm plus a 50% safety factor. Table 4 shows the design values associated with the as-built emergency
spillway. THE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SHOULD NEVER BE USED IF IT CAN BE
AVOIDED.
11

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
TABLE 4.
STORM FLOW CALCULATIONS FOR EARTHEN EMERGENCY OVERFLOW DESIGN
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA ONE 100 YEAR-1 HOUR TOTAL FLOW IN FLOW EN
CONTRIBUTING WATER TO STORM EVENT RAINFALL @ ACRE-IN PER "CUBIC "GALLONS
A SURGE FLOW HOUR* FEET PER PER
ACRES (INCHES/HOUR) SECOND" MINUTE"
10,41 3.19 49.81 50.23 22,543
@ This value was calculated using a 100 year- I hour storm(3.19 inches),taken from the US Dept. Of Commerce Technical
Paper No.40,"Rainfall Frequency Atlas Of The United States". Siler City area.
* This value adds a safety factor of 50%to the overall flow value.
Based on calculations using the as-constructed emergency overflow and the storm flow calculations in
Table 4, the engineer believes this overflow structure to be sufficient to satisfy the design requirements
as stated in the original specifications package. Table 5 shows a few details about the as-built overflow.
TABLE 5
AS-BUILT EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DETAILS
BOTTOM WIDTH OF ESTIMATED MAXIMUM FLOW APPROXIMATE STAGE DEPTH
EMERGENCY OVERFLOW DURING A 100 YEAR- I HOUR DURING EMERGENCY STORM
STORM EVENT CONDITIONS
20 Feet+/- 22,543 gpm. 50.23 cfs 1.0 Feet
* This depth is considered a worse case situation and would in most cases be less. Assumes a fair grass and weed cover inside
spillway.
• New Waste Storage Pond Volumetrie Summary
Table 6 shows a summary of the new volumes and depths associated with the new stormwater storage
pond at TWF. This table was developed using the values shown earlier in this report using topographic
measurements collected on the as-built structure. When considering so many assumptions and
unknowns the reader should consider Table 6 values as close approximations.
TABLE 61S SHOWN ON THE NEXT PAGE IN ITS ENTIRETY.
12

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
TABLE 6
A SUMMARY OF THE FINAL VOLUMES AND DEPTHS FOR THE NEW TRIPLE W FARMS
STORMWATER WASTE STORAGE POND
Added Depth Total Liquid Added Volume Total
(Feet) Depth— (Gallons) Cumulative
Measured From Volume
The Pond (Gallons)
Bottom(Feet)
SLUDGE(Due to frequent clean-outs 0 0 0 0
there should be little sludge
accumulation inside the and).
MINIMUM DESIGN VOLUME 0 0 0 0
STORAGE VOL. Includes farm 12.45 12.45 2,870,000 2,870,000
added water and stormwater run-in
accumulation.
ADDITIONAL STORAGE 0 12.45 0 2,870,000
AVAILABLE UNDER ASSUMED
CONDITIONS.
NORMAL FREEBOARD
• 25 Year-24 Hour Storm 4.75 17,15 1,696,000 4,566,000
• Heavy Storm Allowance 0.0 17.15 0 4,566,000
• EMERGENCY FREEBOARD(Above 1.7 Not App. Not App. Not App.
emeEgencX overflow inlet invert). (>C-
* All tabular values are approximations. See Exhibit 2 for a graph of this data.
POND EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
New Dike Construction
On May 2, 2013 the engineer held a preconstruction conference with Donnie Thomas (the earth moving
contractor) and Harold Woody (the farm landowner) to discuss the needs of the project, safety
precautions, sediment and erosion control requirements, and identified important bench marks around
the pond site. The contractor was given design information and criteria related to construction
scheduling and precautions. Between May 2, 2013 and November 17, 2015 the engineer, contractor and
farm owner met many times to discuss options, work schedules, and progress.
All grass and vegetation within the excavation area was removed prior to construction. Top soil was
stockpiled in a non-erosive area to be used as a top covering on the dam once construction was complete.
On October 17, 2012 EES examined the soils from 3 soil.pits (excavated with an on-site backhoe) within
the proposed new pond area. EES collected representative soil samples from 2 of the pits and sent them
to ECS Carolinas, LLP in Greensboro for analysis. EES had the samples analyzed for particle size
gradation and soil classification, Atterberg limits, standard proctor compaction, and natural moisture.
The results of these tests can be seen as Exhibit 3. EES and ECS Carolinas concluded the soils examined
. were suitable for new dam construction.
13

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
• The contractor began construction on the new dike by gxcavating across the existing pond interior to
form a new cut-off trench. This cut-off trench was excavated to be 12 feet wide and cut along the
longitudinal axes of the new dam. This trench was dug into virgin native clay. The cut-off trench depth
varied between 3 and 5 feet deep along its longitudinal length. All of the soil placed in the earthen dike
and cut-off trench was placed in 6 to 8 inch layers and each layer compacted using a tractor drawn
sheep's foot roller. Loaded pans traveling over the dike also contributed to compaction. There were
abundant amounts of suitable clay soils for dike construction. Because there were acceptable native
clays within the interior of the new modified pond there was no need to line the pond interior with clay.
During earthen dike construction Soil & Material Engineering (S&ME) out of Raleigh NC performed
on-site compaction tests on the new dike as it was being constructed. All of the compaction tests were
performed by S&ME field technicians. Test results showed that soil compactions or dry density proctors
of equal to or greater than 95% were being achieved by the contractor. The S&ME field test reports can
be seen as Exhibit 4. All soil moisture readings were reasonably close to optimum. Based on these on-
site test results and personal observation, the EES engineer believes the dike compaction and soils were
suitable to meet the original design guidelines.
During construction, the contractor did not encounter significant amounts of groundwater in the new
pond interior.
The new portion of the pond dike does not exceed 25 feet in height, measured from the top of the darn to
the outside toe. The reader can view Drawing TWF AB 2.0 (EES Drawing in this package) for as-
constructed drawings of the new pond and earthen dike. All elevations were measured against existing
bench marks placed on the farm during the initial investigations.
Stormwater Management During Construction
Prior to dam construction a sediment and erosion control structure was installed down-slope from the
disturbed area to trap sediment. The structure consisted of a sediment trap surrounded on the downslope
side with a rock and gravel horseshoe dam. The rock dam and pipe were left in place as permanent
sediment control measures.
Rainfall was unusually frequent and abundant during the first 18 months of construction and this greatly
delayed final construction. However, sediment was controlled at the site throughout the construction
effort as originally designed by EES in the engineering plans--preconstruction.
Drainage Tile Inspection and Repairs
No drainage tile or pipes were found during excavations.
Grass Planting And Soil Stabilization On The Dike
As soon after construction as possible, the farm owner grassed and mulched the disturbed soils around
the outside of the pond and on the new pond dam. The engineer has since observed the seed germinated
and established. It will be the responsibility of the farm owner to make sure he maintains a good grass
cover on the new pond and on all disturbed soils.
14

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
r
Canals and Grass Waterway Channels
The contractor installed various grass waterways and stormwater diversion ditches to channel water into
the pond in places and away from the pond in other places. However, water runoff from feed lots, roof
drains, silage storage areas, and uncovered building walkways were diverted into the new pond.
LONG TERM MAINTENANCE OF THE DIKE
After final grading and permanent vegetation is well established, maintain good covers with mowing and
fertilizing. Annually collect soil samples for analysis and follow fertilizer and lime recommendations.
Fertilize and lime native grasses around the site and keep existing ground cover intact as much as
possible. Maintain natural water ways and ditches. Plant new cover grasses as necessary.
Repair mulch and seed beds as necessary if areas of dead grass develop or erosion scars occur.
The farmer must not allow woody ve etation to grow on the new pond dam since such roots can damage
the structural integrity of the dike. The engineer recommends mowing the dike at least 3 times per year.
Viewing dike problems is very difficult through tall grass or thick vegetation, thus mowing aids in
problem prevention.
Use pesticides and herbicides only as a last resort to keep grass stands healthy. Use housekeeping
techniques to control insects along with or instead of pesticides.
Use caution not to empty the pond too quickly since this can cause failure toward the inside. As a rule of
• thumb, do not lower the water level inside the pond more than 12 inches in 24 hours.
Regularly inspect the pond dam and earthen embankments for settling or bulges, side slope stability,
rodent damage, jug holes or pock marks, erosion scars, wave action damage, weeping, etc. Problems
with dams or embankments usually give some warning so pay attention.
No shrubs or bushes are planned at this time. New shrubs and trees should not be planted closer than 30
feet to the new pond and not on the pond dam. Do not allow woody vegetation to PLrow on dams.
Do not drive vehicles across emergency spillways. Keep the spillway clear of limbs, tall plant growth,
logs, floating debris, sedimentation, etc. Watch for erosion and settling. Keep outlet channel in good
vegetative cover and free from erosion.
Grazing on dams and embankments can cause problems and is not allowed.
Inspect all dams, earthen embankments, and emergency spillways at least two times per year or after
every significant storm event. Record these inspections and findings.
USE EXTREME CAUTION WHEN INSTALLING PIPES ACROSS FILL MATERIAL SUCH AS A
DAM. CONSULT THE ENGINEER OR NRCS BEFORE DIGGING.
CONTROL PROGRAMS
Details about odor control, insect control, or mortality management are beyond the scope of these plans.
• STORAGE POND MANURE MAINTENANCE
The new stormwater storage pond is not a lagoon or specifically an animal waste storage structure.
Instead it is meant to trap and store stormwater which contains traces of animal manure. But because of
15

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2416
the nutrient content the farmer must land apply any accumulated water according to his Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) guidelines. Final manure storage volumes, depths, etc. are shown
in earlier portions of this document. The farmer must adhere to maximum and minimum water levels
inside the pond. The farmer must also adhere to his CAWMP and apply the animal waste in accordance
with the certified plan. Thus stored manure management (including solids) and liquid waste utilization
must go hand in hand in order for the overall CAWMP to be effective. Details about using the CAWMP
are beyond the scope of this document.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS AROUND LAGOONS AND WASTE STORAGE PONDS.
1. Safety around animal manure holding ponds and lagoons is an extremely important issue. Details
about safety issues can also be seen in the original 1ES specifications. Unauthorized persons
should be kept away from the lagoon or pond area.
2. Asphyxiation and drowning are two possible safety issues that can result in death or serious injury to
farm personnel. The original set of specifications outlines some of these issues and should be
studied for a refresher on safety.
3. Fencing around animal manure storage ponds is an option to the farmer if trespassing is a problem.
If the public or children will have access to the lagoon or pond area, it is a good idea to have a stock
tight fence installed around the lagoon perimeter. Clear warning signs should be installed around
ponds and lagoons and be visible from all sides of a waste containment structure. Unauthorized
persons should be kept away from waste treatment and storage areas. Make sure all signs read
in both English and Spanish.
4. The owners should install throw type safety devices within easy access from at least 2 places around
a pond or lagoon in the event of a drowning accident. Safety ropes should also be kept nearby. At
least one person at the farm should have water rescue training. Any person using a boat on the waste
storage facility must wear a life preserver and have a helper standing on shore in case of an
emergency. All farm personnel should have first aid and safety training.
5. Never walk on crusted lagoons or ponds. Even thick crusts cannot support the weight of an adult.
4. Workers should never go under floor slats unless accompanied by a helper and only if adequate
ventilation is in place. Drain and clean under slat pits at least 8 hours prior to entering in addition to
providing good ventilation. Workers entering confined spaces should follow OSHA guidelines for
such activities.
5. The owner/operator may wish to purchase a portable hand held gas meter for questionable
environmental situations.
6. Beware of spiders and snakes around livestock facilities.
7. Workers should attend to cuts and wounds immediately with the proper first aid.
6. Animal manures produce gasses as they undergo decomposition. Agitation of lagoon solids or of
under slat liquids can cause large amounts of gasses to be released quickly. The owners should be
aware that certain'gasses are colorless and odorless and can cause asphyxiation and death under
severe circumstances (usually in confined spaces and not as likely around a lagoon). It is doubtful
. gas concentrations would approach explosive levels, but the owners should be aware of such
16

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
P
possibilities in confined spaces. Employees should,be warned about such dangers and trained in
dealing with such matters. The primary types of gases produced by animal manure are listed below:
TABLE 7
Hydrogen Su1Dde- S :.
• The most dangerous of gases produced, especially during manure agitation. This gas is corrosive to
exposed metal parts.
• Colorless with distinct odor.
• Heavier than air, accumulates near the floor.
• Recommended maximum safe gas concentrations for an 8 hour exposure to humans: 10 parts per
million
* Recommended control of as: Adequate ventilation.
• Not readily ex losive.
Carbon Dioxide- CO2 :
• Not particularly toxic in normal concentrations. Large quantities can be released during manure
agitation.Not particularly corrosive.
• Colorless and odorless.
• Heavier than air,accumulates near the floor.
• Recommended maximum safe gas concentrations for an 8 hour exposure to humans: 5,000 parts per
million
. Recommended control of as: Ade uate ventilation.
• Not readily explosive.
Methane- CH4 :
• The most explosive of gases produced, especially during manure agitation. Not extremely toxic at low
levels.
• Colorless and odorless.
• Lighter than air, accumulates near the ceilin .
• Recommended maximum safe gas concentrations for an 8 hour exposure to humans: 1,000 parts per
million
• Recommended control of as: Adequate ventilation.
• Explosive at concentrations of 50,000 to 150,000 parts per million or 5 - 15
Ammonia-(NH4):
• Not extremely toxic in lower concentrations. Irritating to the eyes and respiratory system. Can be
released in large quantities especially during manure agitation. Can be corrosive to exposed metal parts.
• Colorless with ve distinct odor.
• Lighter than air, accumulates near the ceilin .
• Recommended maximum safe gas concentrations for an 8 hour exposure to humans: 25 parts per
million
• Recommended control of as: Ade uate ventilation.
• Not readily explosive.
17

Triple W,Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
r
• EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN FOR WASTE STORAGE STRUCTURES
Animal wastes cannot impact the surface waters of North Carolina. Therefore the engineer wishes
to emphasize the importance of emergency action should there be a spill or similar discharge emergency,
In the event of an emergency or accidental discharge, TWF management shall take the necessary
measures to eliminate or at least minimize the impact of the discharge and if possible keep it out of
nearby creeks. An emergency may be effluent overflow from the farm waste holding structures, a dam
failure, severe run-off of soil and nutrients due to a storm, a broken effluent pipe, etc.
Exhibit 5 is an Emergency Action Plan (EAP) tailored for their facility. All emergency action
plans should be reviewed with all appropriate persons and employees so everyone understands
what needs to be done in the event of a dam failure. Emergency contacts and phone numbers should
be posted in visible locations, like inside the manager's shack or office and near every telephone. The
irrigation operator should have a copy. This Emergency Action Plan should have considerable well
thought out detail on what to do in each type emergency. The plan should address environmental,
medical, fire, and storm related emergencies. Update this plan as necessary and have regular employee
refresher training sessions on emergency preparedness. A flood inundation map is not part of the
attached EAP in case of a dam failure.
Discharge emergencies can happen very quickly and every minute counts. Discharges will probably
flow off-site rapidly giving the farm manager only a short time to react. Therefore making plans in
advance is a good investment and is much less expensive than lawyers or fines. The farmer should take
some time to walk around the site with farm employees and think about possible discharge emergencies.
Ask yourself: which way would a discharge flow?, is there a creek nearby?, is there a natural diversion
that could be diked to stop the flow?, is there any emergency spill containment equipment on site?, can
you drive to the nearby creek to stop a flow before it gets away?, what equipment would you use to stop
a small or large discharge? And most importantly, will any lives be threatened should the dam fail'?
Go over these things in your mind and with farm managers and plan out your actions. Perhaps have a
few emergency drills to see how well your people are prepared. Do not neglect this plan. It could save
you a great deal of money and trouble in the future. Discharges to nearby creeks are serious and could
cause you to lose your operating permit and/or your business.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND NOTICES
Any person or company owning or controlling the property upon which an intensive livestock operation
exists shall be responsible for all aspects of the waste management. The system must be maintained at
all times to prevent direct seepage and/or discharge of effluent to the surface of ponds, rivers, streams, or
to any type of surface or ground waters.
TWF is hereby notified that he/she/they must operate this system in accordance with state and local laws
and regulations. Problems should be reported to the N.C. Division of Water Resources (DW ) ASAP.
The telephone number of the regional office of DWR, Winston Salem, N.C. - (336) 7) 04. The
NCDENR emergency phone number is 1-800-858-0368. ,.� .�$00
18

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
r
rChanges in animal steady state live weight, operations, ownership, and/or waste management must first
be discussed with DWQ before proceeding. This is not an option for the farmer but a requirement.
Significant changes in operations, or problems should be duly noted and documented by the farmer.
The EES engineer cannot take responsibility for the accuracy of all information or conclusions made by
others and referenced herein. Much of the information presented above is based on estimated
conditions, estimated operational capabilities, etc. that are subject to change. When dealing with so
many variables and natural elements it is impossible to predict in advance all operational conditions,
however the concepts and methodology presented above are reliable. The information above is
presented in a detailed fashion so that system operators can recalculate and adjust certain parameters
during the day-to-day operations.
The engineer takes no responsibility for changes made to the above details before, during, or after
construction without his knowledge. Nor does the engineer take any responsibility for human losses or
property damages which should occur due to poor workmanship, improper use of machinery, unknown
conditions above or below ground level, legal problems with boundary lines or easements, acts of nature,
"short-cuts" the owner may take in system construction, or improper system operation. Information
given to the engineer by the owner or others and used in these specifications shall be taken as truth if it
cannot be verified otherwise.
DWR officials and local health officials are authorized to inspect the system at any time.
The farm owner must keep a copy of this certified report on the farm at all times. He or she must adhere
to these plans as much as is possible. Alterations in waste management practices shall at no time violate
• the intent of this plan.
This document does not contain all specifications, rules, and laws associated with the land application
and management of animal waste. Copies of such guidelines and documentation can be obtained at the
local NRCS office, the regional office of DWR, or from the Cooperative Extension Service.
***END OF STORMWA TER STORAGE POND SPECIFICA TIONS
19

Triple W.Farms Storage Pond.
As-Constructed Details,January 2016
r
EXHIBITS SECTION
i
•
20

'^�c^a^'r^**�Asw"1w`n"+""n""'"`''�"'>'.a?sanawt+x.ri; N,.. --.�...w. ..-M,- ..,,-,.. r�•..>.rw�w�i;nGr��r+�r..,......r.�,,. ...,
MAP Joins Map 21
38 74•sm
792(100' 74 I5'00' 1) 19 1000' E.
P° AflTRUl MiNN1S @O - 1117
NI"I
5�AA
\\\y d41AYfgkFi o
rlSS 7 R0 7 J ��Tasr Grosa },� Oodsoas `yx� h Crossroads a RU T
1117NLE.NF O�Yrt •,ySy'TffR W _g, 9 _
F 19+` .o r SPr`-N RCK R0 lla8 •,{4�\��l�gll �q oa 0 4
F-[a`YA V�Pq R Holy axayahaw °�' i g 1/S °O P Cal ondar p
Rock
�p a ,ry 1y5 Rp Milo
b CrsaY�` �'V O s 1 ��, �Y` ��Oh, cN�� =• Crass 54 � .
A _ _ a�_—__.__.
Eli
Sourwood CNgpEt
ENS&D" Farast \ OReE%SB0B0 r� I1105 RD R4 ,gyy
GC art -t._ rS�; 19a5 S DLO J GREEN500H0 Ap j
RD Gv 1 Undlrg 117
'Snow smp Mill FOOTBALL T TI 1005 I�\71 v
`yPtra_s yHURCN F� �M ;•�_. ' /, I .•, O lJ 1 ` '9 o
48li. .tAS 7311 _ s
FRIy 2W7 ! �°_�y PEAKY RD
�� DarwaCW i6 1J 2112
1 1Sy ee Hsvac
riQ! 27Ja R RUSSFLL
v NQ GREEN 2143 Mandala J� °Alpy 1�9 RD CHAPEL A
`m
MOON
PARKTR
JYi. ti0 y�1 \� 1NB .�Gi-E5 Tasrells 1 r,.v.� 90 +57 .HERNDON SgNUk
r,J, HOPE UHE
'A I 1�r-/ pa CASTLE ROCK
k: `\ CrvtcAllald ��` FARM RD '
{ Craasrsada 4anrlinpn
1519
C HDP c�+���J RO HENOERSOR\r _�' - �; JSjS fr
F UeFR ! C 1551 RO i.!' a pGZ9N
�+. lj7( h'q° EPPS +1+1 Em
ORAOY S1 cT Silk Hops
5
r'
+s+i � F5 �� slut HOPE /'� �
A EE 6�°6 QP PO i x INa GUM SPRINGS RO rnam A+OGf I
3`.SS \ � � O C!"'bx J� qD S 1570 +7+I
BY-P
CL
07
Crt
CD
S t
no Ily
k _ w,
� �Pins6Gro ;,,
CC
\ II l0N a (� ^� �Ts C t,t
BA�p°f I F7 boa J CHAPEL RD// s, I341t9PEr
4
� / Y
i Varnaa MC+1' y13
MOUN1 p9' Sprin
GS SEtt
SPRIN y '`... P\N vlEw CHURCH R0 b�rQ
0 Bonlaa 26 q"d�0 r' HfFR° i MGO1Tf 1955 c,
tuAER RO MOORE y4Cir. / NrFS \_ I
t ENa ttp5 � � ,��/ 2!h C6 �' \ 1n s l'+ra• � � I
CHAPEL ^� r•f7
2155
5 EXHIBIT I Biacknd
TRIPLE' W. FARMS VICINITY MAPS°
Scale of-.Road Maps 1" = 3 Miles �
5 D 5 10 15 Miles
5 D 5 10 15 20.Kilomolors �fl

EXHIBIT 2
Triple W Farm - Proposed Stormwater Storage Pond
V olume vs. Depth
4,800,000
4,600,000
i
MA IMUM ULL SPI LWAY i
4,400,000 — _ 66 _QQ GAL ITV_
4,200,000 --
,aoa,000
3,800,000 6L rt7 R 24 OUR
ST RA. VOLUME 1 , 696, 0 0 GA
3,600,000 _ ._.-._ _: .
-- _..._ .... _ _t_._-.....--....
3,400,000
3,000,000 -
3 870 OOOY L.
2,800,000
,
LU
-0 2,600,000
2,400,000
(A
2,200,000
G2,000,000
1,800,000
1,600,000
_._
1,400,000 A ENT'- I
! ! j Z N$ - STOR GE — _
1,200,000 - ---
1
1,000,000 -
!
800,000 ► i ,
600,000
400,000 , 5— �: - -- -
( !
'EM RGEN Y OVE FLOW
200,000
} j IN ERT. }
0 r S
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Feet Below Overflow Level
(All Values On This Graph Are Approximate)
— --PaNi)--E-MPTY.-...MERE._J
17. 2 FT.

EXHIBIT 3
PRECONSTRUCTION SOIL
' TEST RESULTS.
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
60
Bashed line indicates the approximate
tipper 11mit boundary for natural soils
4
50 O�
•
40
n
z
U 30
F
20 O�
10
• N ' ML OI OL MH or OH
0 '
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
LIQUID LIMIT
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %<#40 %<#200 USCS _
• Dark Orange Silty Clay with Sand 72 28 44 78.2 CH
■ Brown,Orange Silty Fat Clay 55 24 31 74.4 CH
Project No. 19941 Client: Environmental Engineering Services Remarks:
Project: Triple W.Farms
*Source of Sample:Pit 1 Depth:0.00-0.00 Sample Number:S-1
■Source of Sample:Pit 2 Depth:0.00-0.00 Sample Number:S-2
ECS CUWma4,iLP
"� YiCC.IrtiKe`iu J1 `
R+YP
MY.nip Y{14ivi isp:41W
Figure
Tested By: AC Checked By: KR

COMPACTION TEST REPORT For Curve No. S-1
89
87
85
a�
a
0
83 -
ZAV for
Sp.G._
2.65
79
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Water content,%
Test specification: ASTM D 698-07 Method B Standard
Elev/ Classification Nat %> %<
Depth USCS AASHTO Moist Sp.G. LL PI 3/8 in. No.200
0,00-0.00 CH 36.9 2.65 72 44 78.2
TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Maximum dry density=86.2 pcf Dark Orange Silty Clay with Sand
Optimum moisture=30.2%
Project No. 19941 Client: Environmental Engineering Services Remarks:
Project: Triple W.Farms
Date: 10/29/12
Source of Sample:Pit 1 Sample Number:S-1
�r,-/�. EGS Cuo —"P
�,'1 L 90efi GwwwG 4vfrr
IL
f 1v� ::E�6
yr Yb'+f9 a n..L ea
--.,*.....,�. Figure
Tested By: KR _ Chocked By: KR
•

r
COMPACTION TEST REPORT For Curve No. S-2
100
98-- -A
9 r0
_ 96
m
v
0
--
92 — -
ZAV for
_ Sp.G. =
90 1 2.65
8 13 18 23 28 33 38
Water content,%
Test specification: ASTM D 698-07 Method B Standard
Elevl Classification Nat %> %<
Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp'G' LL PI 318In, No.200
0.00-0.00 CH 27.4 2.65 55 31 74.4
TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Maximum dry density=96.3 pcf Brown,Grange Silty Fat Clay with Sand
Optimum moisture=22.0%
Project No. 19941 Client: Environmental Engineering Services Remarks:
Project: Triple W.Farms
Date: 10/29/12
Source of Sample:Pit 2 Sample Number: S-2
ECS Carolinas,LLA '
r W+weeOA.Nw K.: fa, 1
Ybl ?Y�i 0-0
ro.If sr M rs.H't Yss
Figure
Tested By: AC-- Checked By: KR

EXHIBIT 4
ECS Carolinas LLP
4911 Koger Boulevard
• Greensboro,NC 27407
[phone][Phone] LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
[phone][Fail
„ NC Registered Engineering Firm 4 F-1078
October 26, 2013 RE: Triple W Farm
Harold Woody ECS Job# 09:23470
3545 E Greensboro Chapel Hill Road
Snow Camp,NC 27349 Permits:
Location: 3545 Greensboro Chapel Hill Road
ATTN: Harold Woody Snow Camp,NC
We are enclosing:
X Materials Engineering Division Reports
X For your use
X As requested
ENCL:
Field Report# 1 10/22/2013 Density/HA&DCP/SPU
a /6�
Russell A. Bend 1,P.E. Bopanna T. Kolera,EI
Engineering Department Manager Geotechnical Project Manager
6
Y
1000.1

ECS Carolinas, LLP
} 4811 Koger Boulevard
• Greensboro,NC 27407
[phone][Phone] FIELD REPORT
[phone][Fax]
u Project No. 09:23470
Report No. 1
Project Triple W Farm Day&Date Tuesday 10/22/2013
Location Snow Camp,NC Weather 64°/Cloudy
Client Harold Woody-Harold Woody On-Site Time 3.00
Lab Time 0.25
Travel Time' 1.75
Total 5.00
Remarks Density/HA&DCP/SPU
Re Obs.Time 0.00
Trip Charges* Tolls/Parking' Mileage' 88 Time of Arrival Departure
Chargeable Items 1 -Basic Equipment 12:00P 03:00P
*Travel time and mileage will be billed in accordance with the contract.
Summary of Services Performed (field test data,locations,elevations&depths are estimates)&Individuals Contacted.
The undersigned arrived on site, as requested, to observe the placement and compaction of soils
for the dam.
Utilizing the Drive Tube Test Method (ASTM D-2937)to check the compaction of soils, test
results indicated that the compacted material, at the areas and elevations tested, met or
exceeded the project requirements of 95% of the maximum dry density as obtained in our
laboratory using the Standard Proctor Method(ASTM D-698).
The technician also performed Dynamic Cone Penetrometer testing (ASTM STP-399) to check
the consistency of previously placed fill at approximately-9 ft below planned finished grade for
the dam. Based upon correlated density test performed at the surface, test results indicated firm
soils at the locations and elevations tested. Residual soils were reached at approximately 3 feet
deep. Please see the Hand Auger Record attached.
Locations and elevations of all tests are based on stakeout provided by others.
While on site, the undersigned also picked up two, 5 gallon buckets of the borrow soils for
Proctor testing. The test samples were returned to the ECS laboratory for testing.
By Terry G.Chrisco, — Field Technician 1800
653W

• i
ECS CAROLINAS,LLP Page 1
AIM E(t!;SQ Drive Tube Method
Field Density Report
Project: Triple W Farm Project No. 23470
Location: Snow Camp Day/Date: 10/22/13 Tuesday
Client: Harold Woody Weather/Temp: 64°F Cloudy w
Permits:
The undersigned arrived on site, as requested,to perform compaction testing on soils utilizing the Drive Tube Method(ASTM D-2937).
The locations and results of the tests performed on this date are as follows:
These results are preliminary until signed by an ECS Engineer,Field data,knatlons,and depths are estimates.
Sample:D4S-2 Description: Yellow Brown Fine to Medium Proctor Method: Standard Proctor Method Uncorrected Max.Density: 101.90 pcf Uncorrected Opt.MC: 20.70 %
Sandy SILT with CLAY
Weigh Weight Volume Weight Weight Number
Test
Depth Tube Tube Soil Tube Wet Wet Dry Dry Proctor Actual S Pass
No. Test Location from &Soil Unit Moisture Unit , % or
Subgrade Weight Weight Weight Fail
1 75'W from NE end of Dam -9.00 5.120 1.090 4.030 .0341 1 118.2 200.00 1 164.20 21.8 1 97.0 1 D4S-2 1 95.2 95 1 P
2 60' E from NW end of Dam. -9.00 5.180 1,090 4.090 .0341 1 119.9 200.00 165.00 21.2 1 98.9 1 D4S-2 1 97.0 95 P
*mobsmation
Additional comments:
Print Name: Terry G. Chrisco
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP WO:24633E

10/22/2013 06:15PM 3366173384 GLENN CHRISCO PAGE 01
ECS Carolinas, LLP _
4811 Koge'r Boulevard
Greensboro, NC 27407
[phone] - Phone
[phone]- Fax
[phone]-Scheduling
HAND AUGER RECORD
ECS Project Na e: F,4g ECS Project No.: 2,3Y26
Date: Technician:
,C2_C 11A1,�SCG - —
Penetrometer Blow Counts
LO ATiON AKS DEPTH (ft) 1,314" 1-34 1-314" SOIL DESCRIPTION
iv
i 6
r

ME
ECS Carolinas, LLP
4h1 Koger Boulevard
. Greensboro,NC 27407
[phone][Phone] LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
[phone][Fax]
NC Registered Engineering Firm#F-1078
October 29,2013 RE: Triple W Farm
Harold Woody ECS Job# 09.23470
3545 E Greensboro Chapel Hill Road
Snow Camp,NC 27349 Permits:
Location: 3545 Greensboro Chapel Hill Road
ATTN: Harold Woody Snow Camp,NC
We are enclosing:
X Materials Engineering Division Reports
X For your use
X As requested
ENCL:
Field Report#2 10/23/2013 Soil density
gjk.,�a Ica
Russell A.Bendel,P.E. Bopanna T. Kolera, EI
Engineering Department Manager Geotechnical Project Manager
•
1000.1

ECS Carolinas LLP
► 4811 Koger Boulevard
• E Greensboro,NC 27407
[phone][Phone) FIELD REPORT
[phone](Fax]
Project No, 09:23470
Report No, 2
Project Triple W Farm Day&Date Wednesday 10/23/2013
Location Snow Camp,NC Weather 60°I Sunny
Client Harold Woody-Harold Woody On-Site Time 1.75
Lab Time 0.00
Travel Time' 2.00
Total 3.75
Remarks Soil density
Re Obs.Time 0.00
Trip Charges' Tolls/Parking' Mileage" 90 Time of Arrival Departure
Chargeable Items 1 -Basic Equipment 08:00A 09:45A
*Travel time and mileage will be billed in accordance with the contract.
Summary of Services Performed (field test data,locations,elevations&depths are estimates)&Individuals Contacted.
The undersigned arrived on site, as requested, to observe the placement and compaction of soils
for the dam embankment.
Utilizing the Drive Tube Test Method(ASTM D-2937)to check the compaction of soils, test
results indicated that the compacted material, at the areas and elevations tested, met or
exceeded the project requirements of 95% of the maximum dry density as obtained in our
laboratory using the Standard Proctor Method(ASTM D-698).
Locations and elevations of all tests are based on stakeout provided by others.
iBy Stephen G. Mabe, — Chief Engineering Technician 1715
653747

ECS CAROLINAS, LLP Page 1
Drive Tube Method
Field Density Report
Project: Triple W Farm Project No. 23470
Location: Snow Camp Day/Date: 10/23/13
Client: Harold Woody Weather/Temp: 60°F Sunny
Permits:
The undersigned arrived on site,as requested,to perform compaction testing on soils utilizing the Drive Tube Method(ASTM D-2937).
The locations and results of the tests performed on this date are as follows:
These results are preliminary until signed by an ECS Engineer,Field data,locations,and depths ere estimates.
Sample:D4S-2 Description: Yellow Brown Fine to Medium Proctor Method: Standard Proctor Method Uncorrected Max.Density: 95.40 pef Uncorrected Opt.MC: 25.00 %
Sandy SILT with CLAY (ASTM D-698)
,ram Depth Tube Tube Soil Tube Wet Wet Dry Dry Proctor Actual Spec. Pass
No. Test Location from &Soil Weight Weight Volume Unit Weight Weight Moisture Unit Number % % or
Subgrade Weight Weight Weight Fail
1 55'W of north and on dam -5.00 4.970 1.120 3.850 .0342 112.E 200.00 163.40 1 22.3 1 91.9 1 134S-2 96.4 95 P
2 45'E of south end on dam -4.00 5.000 1.120 3.880 .0342 113.5 200.00 163.10 22.6 92.5 D4S-2 97.0 17
95 P
'reobservation
Additional comments:
Print Name: Stephen G. Mabe
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP Wo:246341

ECS Carolinas LLP
4811 Koger Boulevard
Greensboro,NC 27407
[phone][Phone) LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
[phone][Fax]
NC Registered Engineering Firm 4 F-1078
November 22,2013 RE: Triple W Farm
Harold Woody ECS Job# 09:23470
3545 E Greensboro Chapel Hill Road
Snow Camp,NC 27349 Permits:
Location: 3545 Greensboro Chapel Hill Road
ATTN: Harold Woody Snow Camp,NC
We are enclosing:
X Materials Engineering Division Reports
X For your use
X As requested
ENCL:
Field Report#3 11/21/2013 Soil density
Ronald R.Newman, CWI Bopanna T. Kolera,EI
Corporate NDT Level UJ Geotechnical Project Manager
1000.1

ECS Carolinas LLP
r 4811 Koger Boulevard
Greensboro,INC 27407
CS [phone][Phone] FIELD REPORT
(336)856-71601Fax]
Project No. 09:23470
Report No, 3
Project Triple W Farm Day&Date Thursday 11/21/2013
Location Snow Camp,NC Weather 63°I Cloudy
Client Harold Woody-Harold Woody On-Site Time 3.50
Lab Time 0.00
Travel Time` 2.50
Total 6.00
Remarks Soil density
Re Obs.Time 0.00
Trip Charges' TollslParking* Mileage" 128 Time of Arrival Departure
Chargeable Items 1 -Basic Equipment
02:OOP 05:30P
*Travel time and mileage will be billed in accordance with the contract.
Summary of Services Performed (field test data,locations,elevations&depths are estimates)&Individuals Contacted.
The undersigned arrived on site, as requested, to observe the placement and compaction of soils
for the dam embankment.
• Utilizing the Drive Tube Test Method(ASTM D-2937) to check the compaction of soils, test
results indicated that the compacted material, at the areas and elevations tested, met or
exceeded the project requirements of 95%of the maximum dry density as obtained in our
laboratory using the Standard Proctor Method(ASTM D-698).
Locations and elevations of all tests are based on stakeout provided by others.
• By John Z.Sebok 1800
657087

ECS CAROLINAS,LLP Page 1
Drive Tube Method
U 3 L.
Field Density Report
Project: Triple W Farm Project No. 23470
Location: Snow Camp Day/Date: 11/21/13 Thursday
Client: Harold Woody Weather 1 Temp: 63'F Cloudy Y
Permits:
The undersigned arrived on site, as requested, to perform compaction testing on soils utilizing the Drive Tube Method(ASTM D-2937).
The locations and results of the tests performed on this date are as follows:
These results are preliminary until signed by an ECS Engineer,Field data,locations,and depths are estimates.
Sample:D4S-1 Description: Red Brown Fine to Medium Sandy Proctor Method: ASTM D 698-07 Method A Uncorrected Max.Density: 95.40 pcf uncorrected Opt.MC: 25.00 %
SILT Standard
Depth Tube Wet Dry 5 Proctor Actual Spec. Pass
r Tube Soil Tube Wet
No, Test Location from &Soil Unit � Moisture Unit Number
Weight Weight Volume Weight Weight o� a/ or
Subgrade Weight Weight Weight ):ail
1 100'sw of the fence post marked 3. 0.00 5.130 1.070 4.060 .0341 119.1 200.00 156.60 27.7 1 93.2 D4S-1 97.7 95 P
3 210'sw of fence post marked 0.00 15.170 1.070 14.100 .0341 120.2 1200.00 157.20 27.2 1 94.4 D4S-1 99.0 95 P
number 3
Sample:D4S-2 Description: Yellow Brown Fine to Medium Proctor Method: ASTM D 698-07 Method A Uncorrected Max.Density: 101,90 pcf Uncorrected Opt.MC: 20.70 %
Sandy SILT with CLAY Standard
Test Depth Tube Tube Soil Tube Wet Wet Dry Dr Proctor Actual Spec. Pass
No Test Location from &Soil Weight Weight Volume Unit Weight Weight Moisture Unit Number % % or
Subgrade Weight Weight Weight Fail
2 1153'sw of the fence post marked 3. I 0.00 15.250 11.070 14.180 l .0341 l 122.6 ,200.00 1167.30 119.5 1102.5 I D4S-2 1100.6 195 IP
"reobservation
Additional comments:
Print Name: John Z. Sebok
ECS CAROLINAS LLP WO:247813

EXHIBIT 5
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN FOR ANIMAL WASTE
DISCHARGES AT TRIPLE W FARMS
***POST IN CONSPICUO US PLACE
CONTACT PERSONS IN AN EMERGENCY (update as needed)
1. Harold Woody - Residence - (336)-376-6359 .
2. Harold Woody - Cell Phone [phone].
3. Donny Thomas - Contractor— Cell Phone [phone].
4, Larry F. Graham, P.E. — Engineer - [phone].
5, Melissa Rosebrock, Regional Office of DWR — Winston Salem N.C. - (336)-776-9699.
6. Emergency phone for spills, leaks, discharges, dam issues: 1-800-858-0368.
7. Wally Walker, Alamance County Soil & Water District County - (336)- 228-1753 Ext. 3.
8. Emergency Management -Alamance County, John Payne 336-227-1365.
9. Sheriff's Department- Alamance County -Phone: 9-1-1.
10.EMS — Alamance County—Phone: 9-1-1.
11.Others:
• 12.Others:
13.Others:
RECOMMENDATIONS
FIRST --
1. Take the necessary measures to safeguard lives? Then ---
2. Try to keep waste out of fresh water streams and lakes.
LAGOON OR POND OVERFLOWS --
l. Stop the discharge at the point of overflow, and if possible, its inflow source.
2. Plug pipes if this can be done without endangering the earthen dike structure.
3. Add soil or sand bags to the overflow point on the dike.
4. Stop all sources of water from entering lagoon or pond including flush systems.
5. Pump stored waste onto crop land at an acceptable rate.
6. Call Donny Thomas immediately (contractor) at [phone] (cell).
7. If Dam is leaking failing — see attached Emergency Action Plan for Dams.
**'�POST IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE ***

RUN-OFF FROM FIELD APPLIED WASTE --
1. Cut off the irrigation pump (or other pumps) and stop applying solids or waste.
2. Divert and contain waste inside an empty ditch or behind an earthen berm. Use available
farm equipment to move soil or dig holes to contain the waste before contractor arrives.
3. Dam up a small slow flowing fresh water stream that has been impacted. Pump out
contained water and effluent back to the lagoon or to a holding tank.
4. Incorporate waste into soil to prevent or slow down run-off.
5. Evaluate why run-off occurred.
6. Call DWR and let them know you had a discharge.
PIPE RUPTURES, LEAKS, or MACHINERY PROBLEMS
1. Cut off irrigation pump and/or recycle pump.
2. Close valves that would cut off water up-slope from the leak so pipes do not drain back
to the break.
3. As a last resort, crush or crimp the end of aluminum pipe if water is not under pressure.
4. Pull suction intake out of lagoon or pond to prevent siphoning or disconnect suction pipe
from irrigation pump.
5. Stop all flows anywhere in the system that are contributing to the leak.
LEAKS THROUGH A DAM OR EARTHEN EMBANKMENT --
1. If Dam is leaking or failing — see attached Emergency Action Plan for Dams
SLURRY AND SOLID WASTE SPILLS --
1 . Try to keep as much waste in the hauling equipment as possible. Close all valves.
2. Clean up the spilled waste ASAP.
3. Build soil diversion embankments or ditches to keep waste out of fresh waters or to keep
rainwater off of spilled waste. Cover waste with a tarp if rain is threatening.
4. Transfer un--spilled waste and/or spilled waste to other containment equipment.
5. If spill occurs on a highway use extreme caution to stay safe in traffic. Direct traffic
around the waste. Notify authorities and emergency services personnel as needed. Keep
waste out of ditches and nearby streams.
6. Estimate how much waste was discharged and how much made it to fresh water.
7. Record (write down) the problem circumstances, your findings, injuries, dates, times,
people involved, and your actions. Get insurance and drivers license information from
involved drivers.
8. Call emergency services personnel (9-1-1) as needed. See phone numbers on the front
cover of this exhibit.
***POST IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE ***
2

r
IS ASSESS THE PROBLEM --
1. Evaluate the situation carefully. Remember, PROTECT LIVES FIRST, then address
the spill, problem, or emergency. Do not hesitate to call Emergency Services if the
problem warrants this action.
2. Get help immediately if needed.
3. If waste gets to surface waters, contact the Division of Water Quality immediately.
4. Estimate how much waste was discharged and how much made it to fresh water.
5. Record (write down) the problem circumstances, your findings, injuries, dates, times,
people involved, and your actions.
6. Could the next rain make matters worse? If so, take action to clean up the discharge
immediately.
7. Who needs to be contacted? See phone numbers on the front cover of this exhibit.
8. How can the problem be prevented in the future?
9. Be sure to contact DWQ ASAP but in no case later than 24 hours after the discharge.
3

EXHIBIT 6
Triple W Farm Dam
Triple W. Farms Dam Is A Low To Intermediate
Hazard Structure.
Emergency Actl®n Plan (EAP) For
Low or Intermediate Hazard Dams
(High Hazard Dams see NCDENR. LQS NCEAP Document)
Alamance County,North Carolina
Dam Location Address:
3545 E. Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road
Snow Camp, NC 27349
Harold Woody EAP Coordinator
NORTH CAROLINA
wf w xi
FQ
x �
nE.i
•

. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
I'llc 1?urPO�C' ICI lhi" plim i." ltI pre';Cribe procc(lures to be followed in the event of-an emergency
�u �:7(riated �(itll tllz. , D;fl1, Which is cat.rsed by Sul ulllrsually 1ar�­e flcx:ac:l (:�r
carlilquakc, a IIl.rlk.11ic(loll 01-Wraulic ol, 5trtictural) of t11e. ityV, Ilullicious human acti itV �.rr(:It
ray '�rIhott L'e. ol, t�°tl�.:r i,rrX. (A' 1;tilure ofthc darn.
Tlft,, 1:riler*'_C.l1k' k—liwl H.'In O.-All) dcf inns responsihilitic", and procedures to:
• Idt.'llt.114" UTIW,11a1 Mid MIRC:ly colldlliol15 that Imly elidaliL?cr the
• lrlrlllltt, r('mcd1rll 'lcli011s tip I)rc'�Cilt a (IM11 liliklrC.. or 11111111nIYe the downstream) Impact.", of a Clam
I'J i I rlre.
«► hlitiar:c ..:lrr'!L:entA to 4v'trll €.l("III,trealrl residents of inllaendillcf Or actual failure of t.11e
dalll.
SUMMARY OF EAP PROCESS
There are four steps that must be followed anytime an unusual or emergency event is detected at
ED
fle st 15 sire
� ..
Step 1: Event Detection and Level Determination
Step 2: Notification aracl Communication
Step 3: Expected Acti(:)ns
Step 4: Termination arid Follow-up
Unusual and emergency events are defined in Appendix B of this Emergency Action Plan (EAP).
Specific actions required fo,_ each step will depend on the severity of the situation as defined
during Step 1 A s(Irnmary c.:) Each step is provided below.
Step 1 - Event Detection and Level Determination
M.Iring the initial step, an un(Isual event or emergency event is detected at the darn and classified
by the L/ ' C';-; rI';r<<rzr. ;';c into one of the following event levels:
Urgent!! Emergency Event, Dam failure imminent or is in progress
Event Level 2, YELLOW: E-rrlergency Event, potential dam failure situation, rapidly developing
Ura(Isual Event, slowly developing
Emergency level clef=,nations lan(:i Appendix B can be used to help the CAA �o rc�,r, tar(r gar"Ca1:=;
_..............
deAermine which of the above event levels is applicable.
Step 2 - Notification and Communication
After the event level has been determine(], appropriate notifications should be made. See
Appendix C, Appendix D and Appendix E.
i
J

. Step 3 - Expected Actions
After the ir- hal nobIcations are ruade, Pon M Woody should confer with .at" .a G ra ham, P.E
;qgF_1 h to develop and exE,aAe appropriate preventative actions. During this step of the EAP,
there is a continuous p ocess of taking actions, assessing the status of the situations, and
keeping others informed through communication channels established during the initial
notifications. The EAP may go tkough multiple event levels during Steps 2 and 3 as the situation
either irnproves or worsens.
Step 4 - Termination and Follow-up
(_)nip' Ow t'1c t hon nulod Ur Wn resolved. termination and 10110W lap procedures should be
Wowed a: oratlinCd itt S021,ilsa1 1. Of this EAP, EAP operations can only be terminated alter
;orttplcrinst olacra wns Hmki IAvnt IXVCl 3 or 1. If Event Level 2 is declared, the operations must.
he dcsignatt,'d l veni lxvvl ; to, 1 Wire tc:rraakating the 1:A1' operations.
t.irgent'. Dain failure irna-ninent or is in progress
l'1ais k all cxtrctatcl�� ttrs_�.c'ni -,ita.t< bum when a dari ladurc is occtuTing or aabviouSly i5 abi7n1
ttt o"niir and c:arnys he t,rc viue.d. When it is deten ined that there is no lomzer time
,tV,ail6rh ' tc) itatpk-Incttt �k)n'Cctive inc,.tsureS to Iorevent hQu-e, an order for
notiih:atumvevact.?a km (if residents and closer of roads in potential inutularkm areas shall be
instied hY the Incklctrt t.`ommaraden if<.applicable. (i.e. potcnttal downstream impacts).
Level 2, YELLOW Emergency - Potential darn failrtre situation, rabidly
developing
This AnNiAnition indicaw." that to situation is developing that could lead ao dam failure, but
tltci-c i,; r1f,t xi inink,dian: threat of h na failure. The. daTll Owner/Operator should Andy
rnonitur ilia c'o adhinn A ahc datat and periot.lically reporl ttac status of the situation. A
rcasmaabic amount of titan° is available. 110 analysis before deciding on
notil i 'atiE.7riic°��s.ci.rati�,rr to rcdclew and closer of n ai.l5, I applicable (i.e. potL nni it downstream
inj.I.Aztll HA)Ie clEtm CNidttion worsens and failure become imminent, the. Incident
[`f,rranK nckr musr hC a"Wfik 6111 ac:thately of the change in the emergency level.
11 lime pe mils, the (At.nct`s l nginee.r and Randolph Soil and Water Cotaservat% District
slaotttd ho conrmAcd It, c laktate the. situation .and recotnntend remedial actions to prevent
twiluiv V tlae dant. 1% shim operator should initiate. renl&li�tl repairs (nt:rte 10Ca1 resources
Owl nwy bc° ,.tv,ailalG OppWi.x Q Mne available to cirnp cry rernedKI actions nmy he hours
or dot"

............................ . ....
Slowly developing
l lii, c�lE 5�1Ii=;ltic tt ii cii�;1tc�� < �itllatit�tt is developing'. bill klas clot yet lllr(2a110necl thL�
l�c'f<ltl(II1 ()i.. lijI, E1€i';ii 11IIc'L i It t)(the dal II. TfIC O licr,ti I Cd InicaI #epl-c ctltalivc or
;jrlil %VslteI- Conservatioil di"Irica office should he Coillactcd to
atc Ow ,,illi<iIlor Multi ivcolr mend actions to take. T]ic cmdItIon of-tlle dam should be
m olclorc•, [)Cci"dI storm cvellls, I o delco ally develop iticnt o[a potel it.ial
�I ti11111II elit i ani 1,EIikllv 'ituxion.
Seca Appendix 11 for guidance in determining; the proper emergency
level for various situatimis.

•
APPENDIX A
Roles and Responsibilities
Dani Owner/Operator ( < j � ®)
• 1- ,(s )n ,r,, aua unu,ual of �--lnwyeiyy event is observed (w wp oned, immediately determine the
C-iucT','CrtcY k<r Cl (,Cc E�-itwrgency I-evcl4 tah)-
L's-`rcttt!` Dane Iailurc appear,, inurtinent or is in progress
Lcvcl 2, YELLOW E ntergency: -potential dash Failure sitnatiorl, rapidly deVeloping
Slowly devclsapmg,
• lunnali.rieIN rosiifv' To app)-opriate For [lie c°ntc.rti�enc'y level and hazards-
• Mon 40 npilmow A the Qn,r mi tr) the Incident Smanumder dispatcher to assist them in
rr4AnIL) tinWk dIld atcIn IW cieciskns r-el'arding warninps and evacuations ifapplimble.
EAP ('oordirtator (Gene Frazier)
• W IWI Ina, ll�,� ,rt�° �,t�E,rt4�hilittc� cthc)rVe t.0 .us FAI' c 001- inatc�i
Dane Operator's Technical Representatives ( 1'x 1 1'� � Y1%1 1,1 1�, ) -- )
• �lcR& dic chin toy nc�i/operritor of the ernes-��ency level (ICICI'Itrinatioll, iF time pernlns-
• :- dVise thcr (IrirIt t,nn (.)l'rentcdial actions to takfr it Level 2 event occus'S, if lisle
Local Ii;mergency Management and Incident Commander below are
only necessary if dowirstream hazards exist (Appendix Q
L(wal Emergency 1iamigement (A WttlY
• \"kl in ciCICY111ination ol v�b would he the Incident Csrmntandcr For this darn.
• W[WIt a ] A°�cl _2 Sitrratioll ,�
I)CIOLrc- errW gencv IU aMr;crnertt pc'rs(itt (ut' p0Y1ihlC r'V<re11s16011S that may' l)e rteedcrl if a
Lc v -1 I 'ini'll iorr
AIL'It tilt' public a,
• When .r LA-vC1 t �IittustiOl) E�CcLPr�:
lerr tlrc puhlic•.
h nricwilia€elv clo-c InW and evacuate people Within the eVacuation area-

APPENDIX F
lAOINETRING DOCUMENTS
Records ( 11,
• Pl,�Hl V I L'i 111 IhC )all!
All huilt 1.1lavIIIL!l'
SEE AS-1 LJII...T POND SPECIFICATIONS FOR DETAILS.

APPENDIX C.
Glossary
�hutInCIII I he l?;w EMI W valle) side against which I C darn is construcled. "I-he left and
ri Ia ,Il,nlnwwh of dmns my defined w5h the observer looking cdowllstream
I rc);fl tllc €,1;1t11.
ppurfenanceS w or anncXC(I to da111s c,"'xiltial to the proper operzltlon.
mal III i 11.11Wc OF of the loll). This tnClttdl;S SLICK striIC ores ,Iti
:,IWiw4 11 . li,�% k'vel ulltict works and Water condtlits, such ,I; tlll1ne15,
ili105w, w penstocks, either throll«h :I dam or its abutments.
Breach %n olicnil1s-, Ihrow-fll the dam that allows dAning of the resc.mdr. A
0n1lt,elflk,(I hi'cach is ;111 intentionally constructcd opening. An uncontrolled
Inc,lcll K ,111 ;nlintemOd failure of the dam.
Cmitrtrl st'c° ion An %U011, W A sco nt in the profile of'.m open channel spillway abovu
11K11 11.11rr ill the res mofr discharges IIII-Orl1h the Spillway.
Dam Al I "11-titIc1111 1) III icr cnerally COI ISIrnCttd ,across a watercourse for [lie
pui,po,c 1�?I nulmmudly or diverting, water.
ItaTIerrieric, '111c ,Ip111t1icn,lnl structure that provWes the controlled conveyance of excess
tipill�ti°ay a rtic:l IhFoW, 11. OT' aroLInd the dam.
Lfm le►0 uutlel appintc mnt structure, usutllly COCI Mill y of a pipe through the
�iiwks 11t (11, pl"incipat spillway svuetuw cquipped with a v,tivc, whose
InIrp,"t' i, Ii, aINov Itmerke the lake VA.
Principal I. w �Ipp!jnk,llant -ORICture that c(;F)Y ys uln id inflow through or aroutld the
sl�illrr of ', ctnhanknlent.
__ _. . ..... .
Itesul-Noir Hic 14RIX A rater Impounded or potentially impmnxkd by talc churl.
sccpagv I ht 1utlw1l 1 o etncnt of water through tare entbankmcllt, forulrfation, or
,1hmtnlent of tale dam.
h:IZ"t St.1iL� 1: 1n��1,�rlce t:eslx�rl5e Teats . Collection of State flgcncies, Non-profit l
,Ind w1untary or.,s anizations
�4hich pro', ids, support to local government agencies in their Response.
rrc•11Vel"y_ prcparedlless S-, lltitigation of
1Y:1E1;tal .`�, t�t'l1IYt�1o��1c',Illlcl/.aCcl. �
I inusual El,ellt ATI v°.'y CH! %4 h ich Won place:, or a condition which develops. that is not
muma1in cm1tltttered in the routine opc:r,ltion of the darn and tcscrr'oit, c:1r
[w °,;t<< , a %,,i iatiwi from thc° operating procedures.

EXHIBIT 7
Farm Name: Tl'iple W f'arrrrs
Address: 3545 L'a,t Ciaeenshuro-C...'hapc�l Ifill Road, Snow Camp, N.C. 27349
Date of Platt: November 17, 2015
Prepared By: Environrtrcntal Engineering Services,
ODOR CONTROL FOR SOLID AND LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT APPLY° AS NEEDED
Note: Pnldent implementation of the farmer's waste management plan and adhering to Best Management
Practices (BMP's) with animal write will greatly assist (directly and indirectly) in achieving odor and insect
control, Diligent nraintettance, cleanliness, and Commorn sense play a very irtrportant part of any odor
control program. 'I'lre below list of items is not intended to he all inclusive.
I. Use common sense :ind coii,,t.mi uh4ervaltiotts to prevent pond upsets or ovcrflows. Stop work: on
occasion and oh,erv(! wham is happertirlg on your farm. Listen to workers and neighbor, wimi
coanplarrlt, .Ire Inadc.
2. Keel) grasses and vegetation out of the waste storage ponds and lagoons. Mow grans, and weeds around
lagoons and pond, at least 2 times per year, Animal health consurnables, rubber gloves, plastic bags, and
tr.ISh tend to iccuimt[Lite in kwoon, ,Ind ponds and should he cleaned out regularly. Keep it neat!
3. No human warstc should he allimed in the animal waste stream.
4. Keep sediment and ItranLII_C huildulr removed from catch basins. Manure tend, to pack itrto the corners
of pits and channels and can cause excessive odors and insects. Regularly inspect pits, sump areas. it
• walls, etc. f0l. caked manure. Use ar high pressure hose or;hovels to clean Out caked manure area,.
5. Always maintain frechoards in pond.~ and lagoons. Allow more freeboard if irrigat.rcm lttIMPS are not
6. Avoid unnecessary agitation of the pond when not irrigating. This will help control odors. "fake
IraeaSLlre> to allow water to floe into the pond in a gentle fashion instead of splashing or cascading. Inlet
piping hould be placed beloN� water surface as long as lire water inside the (rouses will drain out Tully.
Extrernre care should be used �vhc°n filling the lagoon so as to avoid eroding a scar into the side of the
lagoon and exposing undesirable soils. Use temporary flexible drainage pipe it" tlecessary to transfer
wVatSte to the liquid surface. F icxihlc pipe can be left in lagoon.
7. The terminal end of inlet piping should extend just under the water surface. However, if' manure is
scraped or is thick, tyre inflow pipe may be mounted above the water level. If' the p1pe outlets are under
w"atcr and Lire pipes arc air tir_1I11 lire pipes should be equipped with vapor tramps and vents to prevent
gasses from moving back toward the confinenlerrt 110USeS. Glean out ports shcauld also he provided for
each set of pipes. USE F XTRENIF: CAUTION WI-11 N INSTALLING PIPES .ACROSS hl1_L
MATERIAI. St VfI AS A RANI. CONSULT THE ENGINPIf:R OR NRCS BEFORF RIGGING.
8. Irrigation ptrrrtp Intakes should ire no store than 18 inches below tyre liquid Surfaces of lagoonS or ponds.
9, Take extreme care to select olrtirrruitr conditions for spray irrigation of wastewater and Sludge removal
evelttS. Carefiirl lalannirrg will Irel13 rtrinimize odors. Irrigate wastewater in dry warns weather if possible,
prefenthly before 12 croon. Avoid weekend and hohda manure applications unless ab.solutelv necessary.
Wastewater spray cal- nilst cannot he allowed to drift beyond the fatrn7 boundary.
10. When land applying solids or- sludge Orr tilled soils, incorporate the waste into the; sail ASAP,
1

11. Nc.. pr()ducts 'al-C bt°ittg dCVcl(;ltcd to help minimize odors from animal operations. The owner/operator
nliiV utilize ,uch prcKduct, hii€ the e ,honld only be done according to mane acttirer's reconunendatiat,
and .vith cauticm. Nlant of OWSC l)roducts do not reduce odor, and are a �.aSte of nmites. Rapid
additions of��n�y�ue� or k1lel l-,alS could cause nticrol lal upset,.
12. Rccl) trash, dear! ,ulimal,, and ,pilled teed cleaned up and properly disposed. Regularly haul Off (lead
anim,il ca rcasses or seek outer .iccq)tccI carcass disposal method,. The carcasses of dead ammals shall
be properly stored .:[ all tune, and disposed of within 24 hotm, of discovery. Disposal processes shall
comply with the Stale Vctet-inarian ".ui(ICIines Under G.S. 106-401
13, In North Carolina prevailin,, .rinds blow from the soutli%vest toward the northeast, however they can
hkiv% from ugly direction at :ut% time iscc "fable 54). Plant or inaiittain tree; on the west and ,outh.' c,[
sick of the farm to act a, a .H ind break. Plant trees between irrigation fields and neighbors or public
highways. Avoid ,pravlm! oil .N indy clays o[' when the wind is blowing toward nearby neiglibor.s.
14, In housint, ki pep ii I ' inches ()f air space hctwCert IhC hottom of Lortcrctc slats and undtY
floor waste aczun<<tlatiortti.
TABLE 1
PREVAILING NVIND DIRECTIONS IN NORTH CAROLINA BY SEASON
- SEASON MEAN RESULTANT SURFACE WIND
DIRECTION
Mid S grin", (A aril) South-west blowing to the. ❑orth-east.
Mid Stflttlner (July') � south-south-west blowing to the north-north-east
Mid Autumn (OCtol)er) north-north-east blowing, to the South-south-west
Mid Winter OanuTr ) west blowin to the east
Avcra�e for Year south-west blowitw to the north-east
Source of this table is aplly of,the United States Series 82, Decennial CCII'us of the United State,
Climate, -- Sutitntar}' of 1-lottrly ObSer.:ations, 1951-60 (Table B).
15. Tltc NC Divisions cif Air Quality (OAQ) has rules for odor control at animal operations. These rules are
under the .Air Quu16 RUIC', ?l), Scction .1500 - Control of' Odors. Most of" these rules are mentioned
]tcreiis.
16, In emergency situations where land application of manure is critical please contact the Division of Water
Resources (DWR) and tlse DIvi,,ion of Air Quality (DAQ) prior to the event.
17. Ventilation fan, ,hill be mijImained and cleaned on occasion - according to the manufacturer',
specification,. Try to avoid pOintirig ventilation fans arrd shrouds toward neighhorittg residences.
18. Animal teed storage container, ls)Cated outside of animal containment buildings shall be covered except
when necessary to remove or add feed. This does not apply to the storage of silage or hay or to
cotnsnodity hoxc, X�Itli roofs.
19. Animal wastewater that is rccvcicd to Hush tanks shall be covered with a device that k designed for
ready acceSs to prevent oVerllo%. 01- shall have installed a fill pipe that extends below the surface of the
• tank', wasteWater. ThiS is a FCC( III tenclation by the engineer and not a DAQ rule.

EXHIBIT 8
• Fann Name: -arllll�
Address: 3545 East Greensboro Chapel 1-fill Road, Snow Camp, N.0 27349
Date of'Plan: November 17, 2015
Prepwvd B : EnvironnienLal Erigincering, Services.
mmu, coyntoi. FOR TRIPLE W. FARMS (APPLY AS NEEDED)
Insect control is an impriumt aspect of the day to day opme6on or a livestock facility and assists the farmer
armer
in being, a "good neighbor... NNOIC: Prudent niijAemenw6mi of the lbriner's wage inatvigernent plan and
adhering to Best Management Practices (104P's) with animal "OSIC Will "neatly aSSi-,',[ (directly and
illdil-CCLIy) in achieving iIISCO coninfl. Diligent maintenance. cleanliness, and connnon swise play a very
iflipollant part of any odol control prograrn. 'Ile below list of items is not intended to be all inclusive.
1. Tie Griner shall at all Oncs strive to keep weeds and W gniss front growing, uncontrolled around
lagoons and waste wwagc ponds. Good weed control will help minimize insect problems since it
disturbs habitat. Mow grass md weeds around lagoons and ponds at least 2 tinies per year
L DiSpOse of all (qgank, ninci W and trash in containers or dunipsters.
3. Bleep dead aninwis licked , placed in carcass disposal cwHahers, and hauled on"site. hi %sarni
months have the dead aninw], removed froin the farin every day.
4. Keep all grass nw%m, especially around houses and lagoons.
5. Keep all spilled feed and piles of grain cleaned LIP.
6, Folio,v crop stalk and =n de.111111cliOn Pro,pnnN where applicable. Follow all 13MV,, for crop
pr()(IUCti011.
T Small pools of walci- can ck%ckqi around a farm due to equipment traffic, etc. Keep these depressions
filled mi Water does 1011 NWHd Ism long periods. A 'At/' and manicured fal-111 discOL[rage,.-, insect breeding.
8. The fal'111CF ARMICI COIl',LIIL with the local Cooperative Extension Service to discuss an integrated pest
linumgenwnt Program. Incoqum-ate the LISO of pesticides and herbicides as needed for insect control.
9. Employ good housekeeping'.
10. Manure tends to pack into the tourers of pits and channels and can cause CXCeSsiVC Odor,, and insects.
Regukaly inspect pits, sump areas, pit walls, etc. A caked manuxy We a hi,,-,Ii Pressure hose to wash
Out c-A-Cd Manure
11. Am= crusted solids famn lapums, pits, wid channels (as is practical),
12. Fly baps vvifich lure flies to diem with an attractant will help reduce fly p0l)LI1,16011S il' CFIOLIgll of then)
are used around a farm, CSPCLAaHy if the animal waste is IRA k]IOWC(l to Sit undisturbed in Corners 01' pits
or in hard to leach places I lang such traps where they will riot be damaged by the aiiiinats or by
machinery in(] where they can be nwhalned or replaced. Make sure all Manure buildup is disturbed
every 7 days to break the fly hnecduig cycle. For dairies, check with health illspectors, about fly traps,
•

EMBIT 9
Farm Name: banns
Address: 3545 East Ween,horo-(:`Jr..i A I lill Road. Snmv Cmnp. N.C. 27349
Date of Plani November 17, 2015
lJoN red I3v: Eiwironnrewzrl .I- nginocring Services.
ANINIAL 11 ORTAL,ITI NiANAGENIEPU
Ile follroung is the niortalby managernertt protocol for this farm.
I . l.,ve Animals that are sick car near death are transpmed oft site and sent to a roxiering Why The
umnpany is Leta-Way F=arms, hic. 417 Garden Valley Road, Statesville, NO 28625. Phone AM-873-
2072. This All he their method of mortality managemezil.
2. Dead Animal caranscs are disposed of at the local UuWfdl.
3 Properly dispose of all dead anin Gs "Win 24 hours t: ONS there are scaled relyi<,crator or freezer
1"acilities on thc t irin'

ENVIRONMENTAL. ENGINEERING SERVICES
Water • Wastewater • Sludge • Agricultural • Industrial • Civil
' Mr. Keith ],crick, I'.I;. April 23, 2013
c/o NCDFNR - Division of Water Ouality
Aquifer Protection Section
Animal l"ceding Operations
1636 Mail Service (.`enter
Raleigh. NC 27699-1636
' Re: Storniwater waste storage pond proposed design For"Triple W. farms, Inc., Alamance County.
DWQ facility 1.1.). AWD10010,
Dear Mr. Larick,
Please find enclosed the design details for the above refc°renccd project. You may recall that Triple W.
Farms (TWY) is in the process of'devcloping a comprehensive Certified Animal Waste Management
plan (CAWMP) far a 300 cow dairy. To accomplish this task we are pursuing the following goals in
order of mast immediate need:
' [A] To build a stormwater/manure containment structure at the farm to reduce animal waste from getting
into any Surface water sources. Since TWF scrapes the vast majority of their waste, only the waste from
their milking parlor will be directly added to the pond. Otherwise only manure in stormwater runoi,f'
from nearby Iced lots and concrete areas (around barns) will find its way into the stored water. I suspect
nutrient loadings in the stored pond water will be very low. Since; containing the stormwater/animal
waste runolT is most critical, we are attempting to get this task done first. During and shortly after the
pond is built we can quickly proceed to the other goals. The enclosed package of specifications relates
to the pond design.
' (13] To design and install it small irrigation system to enable them to manage the stormwater
accumulations inside the new pond. "['his irrigation system will be part of the CAWMP but will in truth
be prtrnarily fur liquid management. The acres under irrigation have been determined already in the
' pond water balance, but we have not actually laid out the irrigation zones. That design information
document will be forthcoming shortly.
[C] To revise the `l`WF waste: utilization plan primarily for their scraped waste. Since Mr, Phil Harrell
Pulled out of the project I am having to do much of the crop management design and will work on those
specilications immediately after we conclude the irrigation design.
I have enclosed f complete copy of the following for your review:
1. A package of technical specifications, drawings and exhibits, which describe the new storage pond
and dam design.
I am not sending any other packages out until I get the OK from your office, however I am proceeding
with the overall design of the other iroals. Once the pond construction is complete I will send in the
appropriate engineering certifications, as-constructed information, etc.
1
PC)- OX 426, ABEHDUN, N-C 28315 • PHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]

Do not hesitate to call my ollicc it 1 can Answer any questions.
Best Re
1 �
' l.arr� Grahatn; A. .
1:110r,oni7iental .l._A-Igilieering ServiceS
CIICII.bUfC'i
CC' I laruld 1Voodv (friiiic«'. I iiriwo
7 kZ.Jonhi(1)W:(,))
Mcliss<i RoscNock (I)W(,))

r€iple W, I.Lulll�
sto€nmata"'Imatic I'ou,I 1pzi1 201 s
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION .................................................................................1
' VICINITY DFA'AILS.................................................................................... ...........................2
Site Location ............. ..........................................................................
....
Topergraplav and Drainage......... .....
' Animal Waste Related Set-Backs or Buffiers...................................................................................... 3
Miscellaa..aacous Site Dctails.............
DFSIC;N DETAILS FOR T11F, NFW WASTE STORAGE POND .............................................5
Pre-construction Meeting.................................................................................................................... 5
' Waste Storage Pond hicatiOrl.....................................................................................-...................... 5
Description f)1" reatment ........ ..... .............. ..................................................................................... 5
lntpoundn1ent Shapes armed Hc Ni . .. ..................................................................................................... 6
Sludgel lolding C'apaacity .............. .....................................................................................................6
DesignTreatmcnt Volunic:...... ..... ......................................._......._.....................................................G
Wastewater And Rauai'all Storage Volumes .......................................................................................6
NorrnaalI'reeboaard 1`otaals..... ........................................................................................................... 9
Illicl-gency Freeboard ......................................................................................................................... 8
1ligh Water Markers 1,or 1'lie Nc\a Pond..................................................................... ...................... 9
' Fmcrgcnc:y Spillway (..'ora4traactacjaa......................................................................................................9
New Waste Storage. Pond Volaaalactric Surtarnary.............................................................................. 1 1
' POND AND DAM CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ............................... .................................11
(:.itncr,al............. ......................................................................................................... ...................... 1 1
StoraTawater Management During Construction............... ......... ...................... 12
' Vegoation Removal........ ...... ..............-.......................................-................... ............................. 12
Drairaaagc hie Inspection and Repairs (11'Applicable)...................................................................... I?
C cjrc l rc:ncli lnstallartioaa ( inder 1`he Daain......................................................................................... 13
' Building The Ne�v Dam.................................................................................................................... 13
Pond Liners and Interior t,as upplicaable)............................................................................. 14
Ilots Into 1'lic Pond .............---............................... ................................................. ................... 15
Misc. Construction Consideratiuns................................................................................................... 17
1. aarth Moving F.stimate...................................................................................................................... 17
' SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES ......................................................17
General-...... ...—.................. ........... ................. ..... .. 17
' lemporwN Sedinient Kraal Maaicatcna.ance........................................................................................... 19
DISTURBED SOIL STABILIZATION ...................................................................................19
' Site; Prcpaaratioaa:............... ................................................................................................................ 19
SeedbedPreparation: ...... ....--......... ........... .......................... ......... ................ ......................-.... 19
Seeding Suggestions: 2
Fertilizing And Lime Stwrcstia#ns: ...................................................................................................?1
ii

I riple W Farm
Storwwalci'.IIoiitpc I'kmd ApjiI >1.11
IMUICII SLlgg.CS(i(.MS:. ......... ............................ .............-....... ......... ................. ....... ......... 21
Mailliaining vegetat, 1)-)
011: .......... ..... ............... ........... ....................... ........................ .........
EMBANKMENT MAINTENANCIo.. ................................---....................................... ........22
STORAGE POND MANURE MAINTENANCE......................................................................22
CONTROL PROGRAMS FORTNVI�.......................................................................................22
PERSONAL SAFETY AROUND LAGOONS AND WASTE STORAGE PONDS....................22
EMERGENCY ACTION PLANS................ ...........................................................................22
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND NO'1'1(.'ES...................................................................23

lYihle W Firm,
tiursrruxlLr SG�r,�ftr I'tnici :ltiffl"i)!
EXHIBIT LIST
' L'xhibit 1. (..'ounty road map (,,icinity neap).
Exhibit 2- t SGrS topographic Wrap of the farm location.
I".xllibit 3. Acmal photograph ol"Ti-iple W. Farms.
Lx.hibit 4. VOIur7Ic ti- depth graph of the; modified waste storage pond.
LxIiihit 5- ` en1porary seedine., reconime;ndations for soil stabilization.
L`xhibit 6. Alternative sced.ing T-ccommendations.
Fxhibit 7. Silt fencing [Malls
I`xhibit 8. €icophysical Soil tCst Plata f-orl] on-site Soil testing.
DRAWING LIST
I)ra�, im, 1 . "I:WI,' 2.0 Ne-rN pond construction details (EFS drawing).
1
W
iv

l'rihlc N'. Iarm
Mon I15alo titrxaitc I'cmt] ApiI2fiI;
ADVISORY
1
The material contained in this package was developed specifically
for the named client on the title page. This material shall not be
' copied by private individuals for personal use or distribution. Only
' persons authorized by the client should copy or reproduce the
material within this report. Regulatory officials may however copy
■ and/or distribute this document according to departmental policy
■ and according to the laws of the State of North Carolina.
1
1
V

STORMWATER S"I'ORA('E POND AND DAM SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRIPLE W
' FARMS - ALAMANCF COUNTY, N.C.
BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION
'I riple W. Farms. Inc. ('1Ak ) is :I vvrell established Alarnance County dairy near the Eli Whitney
community. The farm is registered with the NCDENIl, Division of' Water Quality (DWQ) Permit
Nurnher AWD10010. Mr. Harold Woody is the landowner where the new stormwater storage pond is
slated for installation.
TWF has been working on animal waste management improvements for a number of years. Progress has
been slow and several NOV's have been received by the farm for delays in animal waste improvernc+nts
and the lack of,having a ciompreliclisive Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
I . 'I WF scrapes melst of their- waste from animals In coil knernent and land applies this waste using, a
manure spreader. Betirre F:I S became involved with the project, a large shed roof'was constructed
' over the main cow feeding and lounging area and this in itself served to reduce animal waste run-off.
According to Mr. Woody the construction of this shed has idso reduced the amount of-time the cows
are oil open feed-lots and thus significantly reduced the amount ol'manure run-off getting into the
' creek. i FS believes this to he a logical conclusion.
2. 'TWF contracted with Gnvironnocntal Engineering Services (E S) to help them solve their animal
' wtl-Stc issues and help them di vc[op a comprehensive plan col action related to his dairy's animal
waste management plan. Early in the project EES met with Mr. Woody and Mr. Phil Ross
(Alamance County N RCS) to discuss the various project objectives and to establish a division of'
' dirties. At that meeting we primarily discussed the items mentioned in the May 27, 2010 letter from
NCDl NIz to Mr. Woody. Based on that meeting the NRCS and EES agreed on a division ol-duties
to ultimately develop "Triple W. Farms a comprehensive; Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP). tJittcortunately in March ol'2013 Mr. Ross withdrew from the project.
�. Triple W. Karnes dice not have it dry stack for their scraped manure, so the need for such was
' paramount. I,I?S worked with Triple W. Farms to design a new concrete dry stack for said manure
o storage und the' main free-stall shed. The new dry stack was built during the summer of'201 I and
has all'orded 'Friple W. Frlrnis considerable flexibility in storing manure since that tirne. hoformation
' related to this dry stack design was sent to DWQ on August 2, 2011.
4. fit 201 1 f ES began work on a st<oraiwater/manure management plan for the farm. That work was put
oil hold by `l'WF until early in 2011, EIS has recently resumed this project with the goal of
developing a lone; range or comprehensive manure management plan. This work includes reducing
mantrre run-oll'volume and storing manure laden stor-mwater run-off. While F1:S has not been
involved with the design or evaluation of any temporary stonnwater/manure run-off management
' efforts (i.e. discharges associated with Mary's Creek), it is clear that Mr. Woody has taken several
temporary InCasures to at least minimize that discharge.
ti. The basic long, term goal for designing it comprehensive plan for animal waste management at TWF
is as hollows:
1

'FriPk W. Ftusrrs
Slorrnwater Storage Pond April 201 i
]A] Design a storinwater containnicot pond to catch and store naanurc laden water that slows away from
the fa.riai building and teed-lot:;. TWI` wants plains designed aronaad 300 milk cows.
[B] To design and install a spray irrigation system to manage; water inside the new waste storage pond.
[C] To develop a coliipl-claensive Certilie;d Aninial Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) for animal waste
' management. This will include developing a new waste utilization plan for the farm.
JDI l0 Submit tile anlinal Wastc permit application to DWQ to CoanpliianCe With the Current rules and
regulations governing anianal waste,
[E] To be granted a DWt issued ilcncral hermit for animal waste management associated with a 300
COW dair4.
Details within this; docunicnt slier% proposed volumes, construction details and target values for the new
storage pond, but dice to tha nature e+f exc`avatioil type work, the final as-caanstraicled volume may be a
little dills.+rent than specified hcr-cin. Alter pond construction is complete, [;LS will provide DWQ with
as-constructed drawings and rngiriGc°ring Cell Itieutions.
the reader should alncicrstand that this design will at times use° Average or published values liar
volumetric predictions. Therefore all values presented should be taken as close approximations rather
than for exact "to-tile-inch" value. (liven the possible fluctuation in out-of-doors anlinal waste
management systems, seiasonal variations, management changes, etc. using such approximations should
be adegtaate for design. the f"trt Ile rli titimagr'r However should not exceed the aninimuin or miucimaunn
recommendations for volatane capacity- inentioned in this report so as not to violate the intent of the
' existing, animal �kasw rules. I"Ach intensive animal operation and facility operates differently and must
be evaluated on its owia nierit and the owierloperator's willingness to maintain best management
practices or BMP's. It will be completely up to the farmer and/or system(s) operator to nianage the
system in accordance with these plans, to protect the surface water and groundwater ofthe State ot'North
Carolina, .and to adhere to all talcs and regulations related to animal vtiaste utilization.
The specifications within this document are acceptable to satisfy a portion of the ariiinal waste
management rules found in the publication titled NCDCNR, Division of Environmental Witter Quality.
Title I5A: Subchapter 2T, ,Section .1-100. Refer to this publications for regulatory details.
"hhe evaluation methodology contained in this document will follow design guidelines found in the U.S_
Natural Resources Conversation Service (NR(.S) technical guidelines when applicable; and is not
intended to contradict standard N IWS guidelines or the design criteria of other organizations. Much of
the; information in this document was obtained courtesy of the N.C. Cooperative Extension Service.
VICINITY DETAILS
' Site Location
The physical location of the proposed TWh pond and dam is in tale southeastern corner of Alamance
County approximately 16 miles north west of'1'ittsboro, N.C. Fxhibits 1, 2, and 3 show various views of
the property.
The TW f property is bordered by mostly farm land and a few residences in a rural setting. ']'Here were
no historical sites noted within I mild ofthis pond.
Coordinates for the farm are approximately Longitude 79 degrees, 19 minutes, 5 seconds; Latitude 35
degrees, 54 minutes, 23 seconds.
7

' I riprc W. I.airou
SIMT11W8rCr S€ora,c Pond April 20I_i
I'u zo era by{ and Drainage
f,
In general, the topography at and arotiiid the TW U dairy consists of rolling hills with all of the drainage
from the site eventually going to Mar-v'.s Creek and then into the Flaw River. A USGS topographic map I
of the area can be seen as Fxhibil 2. The. US'GS topographic map containing this information is the
Saxapahayv Quadrangle map i 1981ly
Animal Waste Itelatecl Set-Backs or Buffers
"I'licre are nttnterous regulrttions related to set-backs and buffers from intensive livestock operations.
Most of the more stringent set-backs relate. to swine production and swine waste. [Unfortunately set-hack
Values are oftCn subject to intcrprctation since they are date dependent. The engineer has made in
' attempt to list the appropriate stet-backs below according to his understanding of the 24' regulations.
Tahles 1 and 2 show various buf't; rs of set-backs that apply to swine and dairy operations. 'fable I shows
' set-backs from new or expanding!, t'�tcdlties and 'Table 2 shoxvs minimum distances from \,taste
applIC,Itrot► areas. The reader should mote that the set-backs shown are dependent on the time the farm
was sited, fWf was in business before most (if not all) of these set-back; went into effect. Wind
conditions, neighbor activities, crop growth, temperatures, etc. may require that buffers be increased.
The fariner must always protect surface waters near application sites, even it' it means increasing set-
back distances.
TABLE I
FACILITY SET-BACKS" FOR NEW OR EXPANDING OPERATIONS
FACII I I Y SET-BACK:5 FROM __ . ..._.. SWINE COWS
Residences not uwnecf by �rl odticer qurns existing before 4-15-87) 300 feet Not Established
Kesidcnces not owned by pr0dUCcr, (farms sited belbre 9-30-95) 750 test Not t:;stahlished
Residences not owned by producer (tar Ins sited after 9-30-95) 1,500 feet Not Established
Public use area, church, hospitals, schools, picnic areas, parks, etc. - 300 feet Not established
(farms existing before 4-15-87)
Public use area, church, hospitals, schools, picnic areas, parks, etc. 750 feet Not I;sttrblished
(farms ,tied bclurc 10-1-95) _
Public use area, church, hospitals, schools, picnic areas, parks, etc. 2,500 [cet Not Established
(farms sited attcr 10-1-95)
PIoperiv Imes
• Farts sited hciori 10-1-95 100 feet'? Not Established
• Farms s'ited between 10-1-9 & )0 i-i)b 100 feet Not Established
• Farms sited alter 10-1-96 500 Feet Not Established
Solid Blue Litre Streams(I1SGS Quad. Milps) 100 feet 100 feet
Water wells serving;the farm propeFtN � 100 feet 100 feet
Water wells nut serving the tarmpropc!*!',.. 500 feet 100 feet
100 vear flood plain Not Allowed Not Allowed
Facilities would include the confinement houses, feed bins, waste holding structures, lagoon or pond
dams, etc. Access roads, stormwater control devices, grass water ways, irrigation fields, piping, etc. are
not part of the facilities under the ahovc set-back limitations according; to the engineer's understanding.
However the grower should refer to legal counsel and/or regulatory agencies to confirm these opinions
since there can be much regulatory confusion about such matters.

rri�le W. F�urrrs
Slormwatcr Swratrc hind Argil 2013
TAB 2
_ WASTE APPLICATION SET-BACKS FOR ANIMAL,OPERATIONS
WASTE APPLICATION SET-BACKS FROM -- SWINE COWS
17esidenees or oCcupicd dwellings xv ithout variance 200 feet 200 Meet
aerntissirjtt
PubhC uwc area, Church, hospital., ckools, picnic 200 feet 200 feet.
areas, )arks, etc.
Any property line nett owited by the larna (except as No Specification (50 tt. No Specification (25 11.
shown below) recormnendc(f, nwrc is better) rec;)nimerm-.d, more is boner)
._.......---..........................._....._-
Any property line with an occupied dwelling on that:
adjacent property (sinless given easement by owner).
0 Dart sited before 10-I-95 ............ ....... ...... 0 feet (more is better) No Specification (25 ft.
• Marna sited between 10-1-95 &. 8-2 7-97........ 50 feet recommended, more is
• 1arrrt sited or expattdcd aster -27-97 ... .... 75 feet better)
• Sara", fields put its place: alter 8-27 9 f 75 feet
Public roaads and rigtrt of v4�a s - - 25 beet recommended? 2� Beet recornmendcd7
Shallow drtintage ditches or grass water cvays 1 f 0 ft(use extreme caution) 0 11 (use extreme caution)
lrri ration ditches or canals (flowing,or usually full) 25 ft (snore is better) 25 It (more is better)
11crcrfnial streams Ox. Solid Blue N inc. Streams from
USGS Quad. Maps) other than an irrigation ditch or
Canal
0 Farms sited before: 10-1-95 .......................... 25 feet(100 tt is better) 25 fcet bitflcr(100 toot
+ Fartns sited between 10-1-95 &. 8-„'7-97......- 50 feet(ItT(} ft is better) is better)
• Darin .sited or expanded after 8-27-97 _...... 75 feet(100 ft is better)
• Spray fields put in place. after 8-27-97 ........ 75 feet (100 ft is better)
' Water wells serving the Carnt property 100 feet 100 feet
Water we]Is I 100 feet 100 feet
100 year flood_pl�rin Allowed but use caution Allowed but use caution
'I'll is setback has not been confirtttecf but it is considered a good recommendation,
l ypical right-of-ways from secondary wads in N is 30 feet from the center line of the road. This means to stay 25 tect
away from the right or way or a total at 55 feet from the center line of the road. The engineer would suggest a butler of at
least 75 fe t frorn public road right-ot ways if using big gun irrigation to avoid unpleasant accidents, especially in windy
comfilions 50 lcect from center lute is rcconinoc sided if using a"honey wagon"to broadcast near public road right-of-ways.
n light application of effluent over grass water ways to maintain a good grass cover is acceptable. This is different from
deep groundwater lowering ditches or very steep water ways, Use good judgment and plan this type of activity away from
rain events. t)o not irrigate-in wet lands. Do not heavily apply waste in valleys which are subject to high rainfall run oil or in
wet weather drainage ways. 100 tect buflers firorn perennial water(i.e. blue line streams) are recommended by the ctagineer
for all fields where waste is to be applied t.if pr�ssibte).
Miscellaneous Site Details
' '['here are no down-slope dwellings or structures between the proposed stormwater storage pond data and
Mary's Crock except for I lighway 87. Riven the distance of Hwy 87 from the proposed pond and the
proposed vol utne of the rtew pond, IA'S does not think any roads or Bridges would be in jeopardy should
there be a sudden and catastrophic f�-tilnrC of the new dam. The only significant htuttrd associated with
this structure would be duce to the liquid animal waste. A recommendation on hazard class for the new
dam is not Beim addressed tra thiti JOCUntent_
4

' I ripk:w 1-
'lIwmualcr.�Is�€.�{:.r I'ssnsl Apid .'UI S
f'he discharge of animal waste: to the surface waters of N.C. is prohibited. Therefore no waste Should be
allowed to make its way into the nearby strearns and rivers. While no animal #arming operation is
immune to wastewater spillage accidents, adhering to the safety guidelines within this document, and
careful waste management, should greatly minimire any such accidents. A sudden dam breach causing a
significant release of waste i, alwa-, possible but not very likely when the; dam is properly constructed
with claN type soils. Animal rna.nurc releases froin this pond should be vM dilute prior to it reaching;
any public water supply intake. Aytratrc life would be in jeopardy associated with any sudden release of
Concentrated dairy waste:. The extent of such an accident would depend on the quantity and quality of
the waste spilled. AnItnul waste discharges from other point sources at this farm are not being evaluated
by FFS.
Prevailing winds in North C'atrolinat arc typically from the southwest and blow toward the northeast.
'['here arc no }ugh density residential developments, hospitals, schools, or parks immediately northeast of
the VWI� parcel but sonu individual dwellings do exist in the nearby community.
I['vpically, the pernieathilit6 of cl fy soils like have been found at I'WF is low, which makes them suitable
]or manure holding structures. The permeability of the clay soils inside a storage pond would be further
reduced due to the nature of the wa.-AQ substrate and the documented tendency of cow manure to assist in
the sealing of' soil surfaces inside ponds. '17tc TWh pond will likely be almost empty during certain
tithes of the year i f managed properly.
Prone limited oft-site viewing, the engineer did not observe any unusual natural or archeological features
at the fame. No endangered or threatened wildlife species were noted, or reported by the owner.
' IN?SIGN DETAILS FOR THE NEW WASTE s'CORmx PONII
Pre-construction Meeting;
' Befitre pored construction begins the engineer, the land owner, and the earth moving contractor must
hold a pre-construction conference to discuss construction details, soil stabilization, etc. This is after
l)WQ has had time to review the plans and give approval of the proposed design.
Waste Storage Pond Location
The new s€ormwater/waste storage pond will be installed east of the existing barns and r:nilking fiteilities.
The new pond dam will be installed across a drainage way as shown on Drawing 1.
Description Of`I'reatnient
Animal waste storage ponds are structures or impoundments that are used to temporarily store liquid
and/or sherry type Watites. They lack the volume necessary to maintain optimum anaerobic activity:
therefore they are not considered treatment structures. A waste storage pond must contain and store
erces5 annual waste and storm volumes so as to provide the fanner flexibility in his/her waste utilization
pl,in and safety aganist overflow. finlike lagoons, waste storage ponds can be pumped dry or almost dry.
The "T'WF pond is unique; in that it is being; designed primarily to contain stormwater that is potentially
contaminated with a innial manure, It will also contain the milking parlor liquid waste. The stored liquid
will be eery dilute in nutrients compared with flushed manures or scraped manures often contained in
' waste storage ponds.
5

rriple W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond, April 2013
' Impoundment Shapes and Flows
The general shape of the new pond will more or less follow the old .drainage way contours. The
proposed overall pond surface will be somewhat rectangular shaped but with a bend to follow the on-site
contours. The internal side-wall slopes on the pond will be constructed to at least 3:1 or less steep.
' Freestall animal waste will continue to be scraped from the animal confinement areas into the existing
dry stack and not transferred to the pond. Only, stormwater run-off and milking parlor waste will be
stored inside the new pond.
' Pond stored wastewater will be land applied via a new irrigation system onto nearby pastures. Details on
the irrigation system will appear in a different design document.
Sludge Holding Capacity
Since scraped animal waste mill not be stored inside the new pond there is no need to allow for bedding
solids or manure solids buildup on the floor of this new pond. Some sediment (or sludge layer) will
naturally build up over time but that is an unknown quantity at this time. Any sludge build-up should be
largely soil sediments. Therefore EES has not designed in a sludge storage component to the TWF
pond.
Design Treatment Volume
There is no Minimum Design Volume or Design Treatment Volume associated with this pond.
' Wastewater And Rainfall Storage Volumes
Typical dairy waste management systems accumulate water and animal waste over time due to excess
water produced by the animals and from excess rainfall. The days available for excess waste storage
' depend on the volume of waste generated, added rainfall less evaporation, and the farmer's opportunities
to empty the structure. The traditional dairy waste holding pond must be4large enough to store the
excess wastewater accumulation until it can evaporate or be emptied via a land application routine. The
' only animal wastewater from the farming operation that will be routinely added to the pond will be
wastewater from the milking operation All other liquid additions will come from stormwater.
' Naturally the farmer will not (and cannot) land apply animal waste every day or every week because of
convenience, crop growth windows, weather conditions, etc. These factors require there to be storage
volume built into the pond system to give the farmer safety and.flexibility in the land application routine.
The time period for this part of the design on traditional dairy waste storage .ponds can vary between
three and six months, but for land application flexibility, 6 months of storage (or more) is recommended
as the safest value to use. For the traditional dairy waste storage pond, volumetric capacities which
' allow less than 4 months of liquid (or slurry) accumulation may eventually lead to problems with the
safe storage of waste - especially in prolonged wet periods. The temporary storage volume for a typical
dairy waste storage pond includes: 1) excess wastes produced by animal production (i.e. feces, urine,
bedding, spillage or wasted water, and clean-up water); and 2) excess rainfall (less evaporation) entering
into the waste storage system. However, the TWF pond will primarily consist of stormwater, so its
design-will be based on rainfall and climatic conditions and not the usual seasonal storage requirements
' for manure and bedding.
Stormwater will accumulate in the TWF pond from barn roofs, concrete walkways, silage storage areas,
1 feedlots, and some.pasture land. The storage pond will be emptied via a small irrigation system in
6

' '[YiP lc W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond. April 2013
accordance with agronomic rates and crop growing cycles. Agronomic plans and waste application
specifications will be discussed in a different EES document.
' Design values for dairy manure production were taken from the NRCS technical guide 633. Table 3
shows the number of animals to be housed at the facility and the estimated amount of animal waste
going to the storage pond and how much will be stored as solids (not contained in the pond). 'fable 3
assumes animal waste contributions will be linear, but let it be known that liquid additions and
subtractions are not linear.
TABLE 3
' ESTIMATED ANIMAL WASTE STORAGE NEEDS FOR DAIRY COWS
Animal Type Number Of Cubic Feet Of Solid Cubic Feet Of Liquid Total Cubic Total Gallons
According To Animals In Waste Produced Per Waste Produced Per Feet Of Liquid Of liquid
CAWMP CAWMP Year That Is Year Stored In The Waste Waste
Collectable** New Pond ** Produced Per Produced Per
Month Month
Milk Cows In 300 291,375 58,556 . 4,880 36,502
t Confinement
Dry Cows In 10 10,360 0 0 0
Confinement
Heifers In 39 28,860 0 0 0
Confinement
Calves In' 45 11,610 0 0 1 0
Confinement
Total ***** 342,205 58,556 4,880 1 36,542
* Design values were obtained from the NRCS Tech Guide 633 from the Dairy Paved Surface Scraped Manure Spreadsheet.
Values include all manure from animals,milking center wastewater,and rainfall falling directly.onto the pond surface. Values
do not include surface run-in or water for flushing.
** These values are based on the amount of time the farmer estimated animals were confine&and not on pasture. Collectable
manure means manures that can be gathered for land application.
Rain falling directly onto the pond surface is reported to already be added into the NRCS waste
accumulation values presented in Table 3, but since we are dealing with a stormwater containment pond
EES will address rainfall onto the pond surface later in a different table. Over time rain water and
milking parlor waste will add to the volume in the pond and evaporation and irrigation will remove
1 water from the pond. This is a balance process. Typically water will accumulate or rise in the winter
months and decrease or fall in summer months. The general parameters associated with sizing the new
pond appear in Table 4. A 24 month cumulative volume analyses was conducted by EES. Table 4
shows the maximum volume needed to contain the maximum stormwater runoff plus leave room for one
25 year--24 hour storm.
' TABLE 4 APPEARS ON THE NEXT PAGE IN ITS ENTIRETY
_. 7

' Triple W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond. April 2013
TABLE 4
PARAMETER LISTING FOR SIZING THE STORMWATER CONTAINMENT POND AT
' . TRIPLE W FARM#
Parameter Design Value Discussion
Milking Parlor Waste 36,502 gallons I month Milking parlor only waste from 300 Milk Cows.
Total Drainage Area into 8.67 Acres * This is total area. Plans are to route the stormwater into two
The Pond different pipe entrances into the pond. This includes the runoff
from buildings,concrete walkways,driveways,some asphalt
1 highway,grassy surfaces,and the feedlot.This does not include
the pond surface area.
' Estimated Pond Surface 1.0 Acres* This value is assumed until the new pond is built,
Area
25 Year—24 Hour Storm 6.0 inches Storm for Greensboro Area
a
Rainfall
25 Year=24 Hour Storm 1,576,000 gallons This is I storm falling on the drainage area and the pond surface.
Storage Volume
Heavy Storm Allowance NA Not applicable for a waste storage pond.
Approximate Liquid 1,804,000 gallons Volume needed considering liquid accumulations and irrigation
Volume Needed For opportunities.
Storage
Estimated.Maximum 3,380,000 gallons+/- This is the assumed maximum volume of the pond. Water levels
Total Pond Storage will vary depending on time of year, irrigation opportunities, farm
Volume Needed management, and rainfall. This volume is a maximum prior to
liquid overflow.
#Precipitation and evaporation data was provided by NOAA Atlas 14,Volume 2,Version 3 for Greensboro pump station 36/089 N 79.769
W,plus US Department of Commerce,Weather Bureau Technical Paper number 40 titled"Rainfal6:Ffequency Atlas of the United States".
Pond surface evaporation estimate is based on information from NOAA Technical Report NWS 341 '.This would be fresh water lake
evaporation. Use Greensboro values for PAN evaporation.
*EES used aerial photographs and topographic measurements around the proposed pond site in order.to estimate drainage areas,etc.
' Normal Freeboard -Totals
Normal freeboard is the extra depth above the maximum "operating" high water level in a waste holding
structure. This extra depth (or extra storage volume),is a safety measure that allows for the storage of at
least one 25 year - 24 hour storm (described above). From the volume vs. depth graph in Exhibit 4, the
engineer has estimated that the single 25 year — 24 hour storm mentioned above would occupy the top
5.5 foot (+/-) of liquid storage capacity of this basin. When possible the farmer should keep some extra
freeboard -above the 25 year—24 hour storm if the structure is sufficiently large to allow this reserve.
' Normal Freeboard For First 25 Year-24 Hour Storm= 5.4 Feet
' Emergency Freeboard.
Emergency freeboard is the extra depth added to a waste holding structure for safety against a random
embankment overflow or dam "over-topping". 'This extra depth is a safety measure and prevents water
from spilling over the dam, resulting in dam erosion and complete or partial failure. Emergency
8

1
Triple W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond. April 2013
freeboard is measured from the lowest portion of the pond rim to the invert of the emergency overflow.
The emergency freeboard was chosen to be l foot at this location. The emergency freeboard should in
' no case be less than l foot.
Emergency Freeboard = 1.0 Foot.
High Water Markers For The New Pond
Permanent water level markers shall be installed inside all storage ponds, lagoons, or pump basins so the
' operator can tell where the freeboard reserves begin. The farmer shall install these markers so the
operator can tell at a glance the current water level when water,levels approach the "pump start" and
' "pump stop" levels. All waste storage pond water levels must be read and recorded weekly. This
measuring device should be well marked and be of a design which best serves the operator's purpose.
Triple W. Farms may use PVC pipe, a 6 in x 6 in. treated wooden pole (or similar non corrosive type
materials) to mount on the inside of the new basin, clearly marked at important levels. Applicable
"pump start" and "pump stop" levels are shown below in Table 5. A PVC pole sitting on a concrete
base on the bottom of the basin is an example of a marker that would be suitable. This pole shall have
tees or similar "identifiable marks" showing important water levels. All poles or markers should be
graduated in 6 inch increments if possible and be made so that marks do not become unreadable due to
staining. See Exhibit 4 to view a graph of the pond volume vs. depth.
TABLE 5
IMPORTANT WATER LEVELS INSIDE THE WASTE STORAGE POND AT TWF
START PUMPING BEFORE HERE STOP PUMPING AT LEAST BY HERE
POND ID FEET BELOW OVERFLOW FEET:BELOW OVERFLOW
' Waste Stara a Pond 5.4 feet * It is acce•.table to empty the basin
* = Storage for one 25 Year-24 Hour Storms-is available between here and overflow. ThisIs a maximum water level in the
pond. Water levels should always be kept below this level,except in weather emergencies.
.Emergency Spillway Construction
' An emergency spillway or overflow is a man-made structure attached to or made part of' a liquid
impoundment such as a lagoon, or a waste holding,structure. The emergency spillway allows any liquid
overflows out of the impoundment a path of exit that minimizes damage to the pond dam or
embankment. The idea for an emergency overflow structure is to provide a controlled release of liquid
instead of a random embankment overflow that could destroy the embankment, potentially cause human
or property losses, and allow additional liquid manure to escape.
This emergency spillway should be located on undisturbed, firm soil not easily eroded or on a very solid
surface like bedrock, away from the lagoon dam if possible, or in a position where minimal dam height
' . is found. Either overflow pipes or earthen overflows may be used, but earthen structures are preferred.
The amount of water to be safely passed by an emergency overflow will depend on several factors and
the degree of safety the designer requires. The emergency spillway should pass the overflow water
' without over-topping the embankments or dam.
In the engineer's opinion an intense short duration storm is the appropriate approach to spillway design.
Therefore the engineer decided to use a 100 year - 1 hour storm for emergency spillway design. For
9

'rriple W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond. April 2013
safety he has assumed this stormwater flow will impact the pond without consideration to runoff
coefficients. Weather data for the Greensboro area suggests rainfall during this storm event is about 3.66
inches. Average flow during this storm event calculates to be:
3.66 in./hr. x 9.67 acres x 3,630 cu.ft./ac.-in. = 128,474 cu.ft./hr.
' 128,474 cu.ft./hour 13,600 seconds/hour= 35.69 cu.ft.lsce. (cfs)
It is a wise practice to allow for sudden surges or peak flows when designing emergency overflows.
However the earthen overflows are only for emergencies. Without presenting-the calculations for peak
flows it is safe to say that the above flow could be increased by a factor of safety to account for almost
any peak flow situation. The engineer has assumed an almost instantaneous flow out of the spillway.
Estimated Peak Flow(with 40 percent safety factor): 50 cubic feet per second (cfs)
Width of the Overflow= 16 feet wide at bottom and 22 feet wide at top, I foot deep.
p
' The contractor shall use a flat overflow cut into the rim of the pond to convey the overflow. Earthen
overflows shall have sufficient vegetation maintained to prevent scouring of the soil. Recommendations
on the emergency overflow construction appear in Drawing 1.
' If the emergency overflow is earthen a good grass cover shall be maintained along its length. The
spillway should be designed so that any overflows would be conveyed well passed the pond construction
area and toe of any embankments. A combination of grass, rock rip rap, etc. may be used for the control
of erosion in the event of an emergency overflow for earthen overflows. THE EMERGENCY
OVERFLOW SHOULD NEVER BE USED IF IT CAN BE AVOIDED,
The emergency overflow on this structure shall be earthen. Its size has-been based on information
obtained in the manual titled "Erosion-And Sediment Control Planning And Design Manual", published
by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and NaturAl- Resources, Land Quality
Section. It is suggested the emergency overflow entrance for the pond ov6rflow be 1 foot below the
lowest point of the pond's inner rim. The emergency overflow shall in no case be less than 1 foot below
' the lowest portion of the pond's inner rim.
The emergency overflow elevations should be verified with a transit after construction.
1
1
' TABLE 6 APPEARS ON THE NEXT PAGE IN ITS ENTIRETY
10

Triple W.Farms
Stormwater Storage fond. April 2013
New Waste Storage Pond Volumetric Summary
TABLE 6
A SUMMARY OF THE VOLUMES AND DEPTHS FOR THE NEW TRIPLE W FARMS POND
proposed for construction
Added Liquid Total Liquid Added Volume 'Total Volume
Depth From Depth From (Gallons) (Gallons)
Bottom(Feet) Bottom(Feet)
SLUDGE 0 0 0 0
MINIMUM DESIGN VOLUME 0 0 0 0
' MAXIMUM WATER LEVEL 10.5 10.5 1,804,000 1,804,000
BELOW STORM STORAGE.
Reflects water inflow and irrigation
' outflow. Considered the maximum
water level due to normal operations.
These values are only approximate.
NORMAL FREEBOARD
25 Year-24 Hour Storm 5.5 16.0 1,576,000 3,380,000
' • Heavy Storm Allowance 0.0 1 Not App. Not App. Not App.
EMERGENCY FREEBOARD 1.0 1 17.0 0 3,380,000
* All tabular values are approximations. See Exhibit 4 for a graph of this data. These values were obtained
running a water balance simulation with rainfall and irrigation.
1 POND AND DAM CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
General
TWF will be building a new earthen stormwater containment pond and dam. Construction of both the
pond and dam will take place more or less at the same time. Earth may be borrowed out of the pond
interior for the dam and earthen structures around the!pond. Sediment must be maintained on the site
' and not allowed to escape off-site. Specifications on sediment and erosion control structures appear
elsewhere in this package.
The new dam shall nowhere exceed 25 feet in height measured from the highest top-of-dam point to the
' outside toe just below the high point. The dam height shall be made to allow for 2 to 5 percent settling.
The dam top width shall be at least 12 feet wide, but can be made wider without the engineer's consent.
The natural base on which the dam shall sit is recommended to have a slope 4:1 or less steep before
construction starts. While during construction the clay soils can dry out or be found to lack sufficient
moisture to compact. Moisture can be added to the native material if needed for a good bond. if an
upper layer of clay is allowed to dry (on weekends for instance) that layer of soil shall be wetted and
mixed before adding additional lifts when construction resumes. Wetness due to rain shall require the
wet soil to be removed before resuming construction.
The contractor shall attempt to utilize the highest clay content soils whenever possible for dam repairs
and cut-off trench construction. These soils should be as rock and gravel free as possible.
ll

' I'riP le W.Farms
Slormwatcr Storage Pond. April 2013
' Stormwater Management During Construction
The contractor shall install temporary diversion ditches and terraces to keep rainwater out of the pond,
cut-off trench, etc. during construction. Rainwater which collects inside the pond and/or cut-off trench
during construction shall be pumped out by the contractor so that soil excavation can resume under dry
' conditions. Soggy or saturated soils will not properly compact and must be removed prior to permanent
dam building. It will be completely up to the contractor to manage rainwater accumulation so as to not
compromise soil compaction, etc.
Vegetation Removal
All excavation surfaces and/or soil borrow areas shall be cleared of brush, trees, roots and vegetation.
' Fill and compaction work must occur on bare ground without vegetation, rocks, debris, etc. A small
amount of this work should be done at any one time. Existing grass covers shall remain in place if and
where possible to minimize erosion.
' When the new dam is constructed, natural grade can be used to build upon once grass and vegetation
have been removed and if the site is not severely rocky, soft, wet, or steep. The natural grade shall be
' developed to remove all trees, shrubs, grasses, boulders, etc. and scarified before fill is added. This type
activity will help assure a good bond between the first layer of fill material and native material.
Moisture can be added to the native material if needed for a good bond.
Tree stumps (should they be found) must be removed prior to dam construction.
Stumps, laps, and vegetation are to be removed from the site and either hauled off-site or burned or
' buried outside of the construction area. Permits (if required)-for vegetation disposal will be obtained by
either the farm owner or the earth moving contractor.
Drainage Tile Inspection and Repairs (If Applicable)
The soils surrounding the proposed TWF pond and embankment were not,.Bound to have subsurface
drain tile installed. In the event drain pipes would be found during excavation, the following procedures
shall be performed on each pipe inside or under the dam or through the side of the pond walls.
1 • The contractor shall at all times be looking for evidence of drain pipes in or around the pond.
• Mark the spot where the pipe is discovered so the spot can be identified in the future. This may mean
' placing a flagged wooden stake away from the-work area but in line with the pipe. If water is found
coming out of or around the pipe, notify the engineer. Serious leaks should be stopped immediately.
The contractor shall have on hand materials to plug leaks found in pipes. For leaks around the
' outside of pipes the contractor can use granular bentonite clay (such as Hole Plug) or for inside of
pipe leaks the contractor shall use a polyurethane foam sealant that will work to expand and stop
water flow (such as Great Stuff).
• Dig around the pipe to see if it appears to extend under the dam or if it is only a small segment of
drain pipe dug up from the original construction. If at any time water is found coming out of or
around the pipe attempt to stop the leak and notify the engineer
• Dig into the dam far enough so that the pipe can be cut off and the end will be out of the way of
future earth moving and construction.
• Fill the end of each exposed and cut-off pipe with a neat cement, or a cement and sand mix. The
concrete needs to be sufficiently fluid to flow into the pipe. Make sure the cement completely fills
the drainage pipe at least 18 inches from the terminal end, making sure all voids are filled. If water
' is leaking from the pipe, first stop the water flow as mentioned above. If plugging inside the pipe for
12

Triple W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond. April 2013
' temporary leak stoppage is necessary, make sure the temporary plug is at least 18 inches up inside
the pipe to allow room for the concrete fill.
Using soil or boards, make a small plug or frame around the end of the pipe and pour a 12 inch x 12
inch x 12 inch plug at this point. This concrete plug should completely cover the pipe end for 360
degrees so concrete surrounds the terminal end of the pipe. When finished the concrete should be
inside and outside the terminal end of the pipe.
• When the concrete has hardened, it can be covered with soil. Make sure to mark the location where
the pipe was found. Do not damage this concrete plug during future dam repairs.
Core Trench Installation Under The Dam
' Once clear of vegetation and any drain pipes have been removed, the contractor and/or engineer shall
establish elevations and placement of the cut-off trench in the area where the new dam will be
constructed. C
A cut-off trench or key shall be installed on the center line of the dam along its longitudinal axis. This
cut-off trench shall extend up either side of the natural side slopes of the drainage way so as to form a
barrier to water seepage under the dam and to prevent long term dam movement. The cut off trench
shall be sufficiently wide to allow earth moving machinery to pack all areas of the fill by driving over
the fill. Compaction with a sheep's-foot roller or vibratin roller is required. hour to six passes shall be
' made over each' 6 or 8 inch lift for compaction before adding another lift. Earthen lift depths can be no
greater than the length of the feet of the sheep's foot roller. It is expected the cut off trench will need to
be a minimum of 12 feet wide, but this will depend on the packing technique. In no case shall the cut off
trench bottom be less than 8 feet wide.
The cut off trench shall be taken to a depth sufficient to reach a solid, low permeability clay base, but no
e less than 3 feet deep, except where it tapers up to natural grade on the ends' The trench should not be
taken down into a fractured rock base. The trench shall not be taken to subsurface water. The cut off
trench shall be inspected for tile drains after it is cut just as a precaution.
' The cut off trench shall be backfilled with a relatively impermeable clay material of sufficient moisture
content to pack well via earth moving machinery.-;:Moisture should be between optimum and optimum +
4%. Sufficient clay material should be -'available on the TWF ,pond site to provide this material.
Additional material shall be imported to the siteif needed: Cut off trench backfill material shall be free
of boulders, roots, sod, frozen soil, brush, and other unsuitable material. The backfill material shall not
contain rocks greater than 6 inches in diameter. The dam cut-off trench shall be free of standing water
' when backfilling begins.
Compaction of the cut-off trench shall take place until a 95 percent compaction at optimum moisture is
achieved. This shall be verified at the discretion of the engineer. Moisture may vary + 4% from
optimum if compaction can be achieved. Laboratory results from earlier,sail testing can be seen as
Exhibit 8.
Building The New Dam
The contractor shall attempt to utilize the highest clay content soils whenever possible for dam and cut-
off trench construction. These soils should be as rock and gravel free as possible. The dam base shall be
made sufficiently wide to allow earth moving machinery to pack all areas of the fill by driving over the
fill. The dam base width shall be calculated by the contractor based on the finished dam height, the top
13

'1'riP le W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond. April 2013
of dam width, and the inside and outside slopes. The base of the dam shall be more or less centered over
the cut-off trench.
The back slope of the dam shall not be steeper than 3:1. A less steep slope is acceptable if dam height is
not compromised. The inside of the new dam (and internal pond sides) shall have a slope no steeper
than 3:1 unless authorized by the engineer. The front and back portions of the dam should have a
combined ratio of at least 6 horizontal to 1 vertical. Drawing; 1 shows more detail on the dam
construction. Dam construction will be checked by the project engineer .or a designated NRCS
' representative. Compaction checks shall be made as needed and per the engineer's opinion. The top of
the dam shall be at least 12 feet wide and flat and level or made to slope slightly to the outside so
rainwater will sheet away from the pond interior.
' Any dam that equals to or exceeds 25 feet in height prior to settling, measured from the top of the dam to
the outside toe; or impounds more than 50 acre feet of water at the highest point of the crest of the dam
will be considered jurisdictional or and will require a permit from the North Carolina Department of
' Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (NCDENR) under the Dam Safety Act. See earlier
discussions about dam height. Dams where failure could result in loss of life or cause significant
damage to property shall be classified as High Hazard.
A sheep's foot roller or vibrating roller is required for dam compaction. Tour to six passes shall be
made over each 6 or 8 inch lift for compaction before adding another lift. Earthen lift depths can be no
Lgreater than the length of the feet of the sheep's foot roller.
Compaction of the dam and cut-off trench shall take place until a 95 percent compaction at optimum
moisture is achieved. This shall be verified at the discretion of the construction inspector and/or the
engineer. Moisture may vary+ 4% from optimum if compaction can be achieved. Laboratory results on
earlier soil test can be seen as Exhibit 8.
An effort shall be made to use uniform materials though out the fill. Alternating layers of dissimilar
materials is strongly discouraged. When dissimilar materials are used the most impermeable materials
should be used at dam center and on the interior portions of fill (wet,side of the dam centerline). Always
eliminate voids during fill operations.
All fill layers shall be made to bond. .This type,activity will help assure a good bond between the first
' layer of fill material and native material and subsequent'layers of fill. Moisture can be added to the
native material if needed for a good bond. If an upper layer of clay is allowed to dry (on weekends for
instance) that layer of soil shall be wetted or the dry soil scraped off and mixed before adding additional
lifts when construction resumes. Wetness due to rainshall require the wet soil-to be removed before
resuming construction.
' Pond Liners and Interior Finishes (as applicable)
When the needed pond (or lagoon if applicable) volume is achieved the engineer shall inspect the
interior to view any soil aspects that could affect the soil permeability. This is considered the "Macro
Permeability" aspect of the construction soils. Should there be any stratification of the soil layers,
changes in soil types, root penetrations, cracks, or other possible avenues for liquid outflow, the interior
' of the pond shall be scarified or disked. This soil feature destruction will,help homogenize the pond's
inner face and reduce the macro permeability factor. Asa minimum this disturbed soil shall be packed
with a sheep's foot roller using a minimum of 3 passes with the roller over the entire lagoon inner area.
If hard weathered rock is encountered it would be better to go directly to the liner material mentioned
14
1

Triple W.Farms
Stormwatcr Storage Pond. April 2013 .
rbelow and not try to disk the harder materials. If a soft but stratified material is encountered it should be
scarified prior to the liner installation. Clay lift thickness shall not exceed the length of the feet or nubs
' of the sheep's-foot roller drum throughout lagoon construction.
The contractor shall attempt to utilize the highest clay content soils whenever possible for dam, liner,
and cut-off trench construction. These soils should be as rock and gravel free as possible. Should rock
outcropping, gravel beds, or sandy zones be encountered during pond construction and such areas
exposed to animal waste by their position below the normal wastewater liquid level, the contractor shall
cover these areas with a good rock free clay, placed in 6 to 8 inch lifts, and compact the clay with at least
3 passes of a sheep's foot roller per lift. As a rule of thumb, where waste water is deepest there should be
installed a clay liner at least 1/8 as deep as the typical water depth over that portion of the liner. For
' example if the high water depth at the "pump-on" level is'24 feet above the clay liner, the liner shall
have a thickness of 3 feet(24 feet/8 = 3 feet), but the engineer reserves the right to alter this formula as
needed. In no case shall the pond bottom clay liner, using native clays, be less than 2 feet thick.
' Bentonite clay may be used as a soil additive should the need arise. The use of bentonite clay shall be
discussed with the engineer first. Final liner thickness shall be left up to the engineer. The engineer or
a soil scientist should make recommendations about soil additives. Liner material should be sufficiently
moist so proper compaction can be obtained. NRCS criteria for clay liners suggest a permeability of
1.25 x 10-6 cm/sec or lower, however this is extremely difficult to accurately check in the field. Liner
permeability shall be checked if the clay liner quality is in question.
Flow Into The Pond
Stormwater is anticipated to flow into the pond at two points. One entrance point will receive flow from
the southern end (or head of the pond) and the other entrance point will receive flow from the western
side (or west side entrance). Since these entrance points will be permanent they are not specifically
' designed to trap sediment. That will take place inside the pond interior. Culvert pipes will be used to
transfer water through the earthen embankments and into the pond interior to avoid erosion. The
discussions below are estimates only and are being supplied to offer some ideas to the contractor on
construction. The final configuration of these entrance points will depend somewhat on final grading.
Culvert sizes are considered minimums. The engineer has assumed stormwater routing to the culverts
will be stabilized with vegetation. See Drawing I for construction details.
r
r --
' TABLE 7 APPEARS ON THE NEXT PAGE 1N ITS ENTIRETY
r
r .
t
15
r

Triple W.Farms
Storrnwater Storage Pond. April 2013
TABLE 7
PARAMETER LISTING FOR CULVERT INLETS INTO THE STORMWATER
CONTAINMENT POND AT TRIPLE W FARM #
Parameter Design Value I Discussion
SOUTHERN ENTRANCE(head of pond)
' Drainage Area Into Head 5.78 Acres Calculations for sizing inlet pipe.
of Pond Inlet Pipe
Composite Runoff 0.475 Using Stormwater BMP Manual Table 8.03a and other technical
Coefficient For The references.
' Head of Pond Inlet Pipe
Maximum Slope Length 1,100 feet @ 2.73% Taken from maps and aerial photos.
and Percent
Time of Concentration 6.9 minutes Calculated value based on surface features and slopes
' Storm Intensity 25 Year--6.9 minutes This assumes a 6.99 inch per hour storm or about 0.8 inches in the
time of concentration frame. The engineer considers this a
conservative estimate for sizing pipes and potential flows. Values
' were taken from Greensboro,NC rainfall data. #
Estimated Flow At Time 19 cfs Using Rational Method for calculating flows.
of Concentration
' Inlet Pipe Size for Head 24 inch Use smooth wall corrugated pipe well anchored with inlet
of Pond protection.
WEST SIDE ENTRANCE(west side of pond)
' Drainage Area Into Head 2.90 Acres Calculations for sizing inlet pipe.
of Pond Inlet Pipe
Composite Runoff 0.480 Using Stormwater BM1' Manual-Table 8.03a and other technical
Coefficient For The references.
Head of Pond Inlet Pipe
Maximum Slope Length 570 feet @ 2.63% Taken from maps and aerial photos.
' and Percent
Time of Concentration 5 minutes Calculated value was 4.2 minutes so use a default value of 5
minutes based on surface features and slopes
Storm intensity 25 Year—5 minutes This assumes'a 7.55 inch per hour storm or about 0.53 inches in
the time of concentration-frame, The engineer considers this a
conservative estimate for sizing pipes and potential flows. Values
were taken from Greensboro,NC rainfall data.It
' Estimated Flow At Time 10.5 cfs Using Rational Method for calculating flows.
of Concentration
Inlet Pipe Size for Head 24 inch Use smooth wall corrugated pipe well anchored with inlet
' of Pond protection.This pipe will also take any overflow from the southern
entrance pipe should that ever fail to take a very intense storm.
Actual calculated size is smaller than 24 inches.
I Precipitation and evaporation data was provided by NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 for Greensboro pump station
36I089 N 79.769 W, plus US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau Technical Paper number 40 titled "Rainfall
Frequency Atlas of the United States". Pond surface evaporation estimate is based on information from NOAA Technical
Report NWS 34. This would be fresh water lake evaporation. Use Greensboro values for PAN Evaporation.
1 .
16

1 Triple W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond. April 2013
Misc. Construction Considerations
' 1. TWF personnel; project engineer(s), and construction crews will supervise all dam construction. This
shall serve as a quality control measure. The engineer shall have overall construction authority.
2. The engineer recognizes the need to control erosion and sediment transport off site thus a few
suggestions are being included as part of this.package to serve as minimal guidelines for sediment
and erosion control measures. See„Drawing 1 for more details.
' 3. A pre-construction conference will be required between the engineer, the contractor, and the owners
before construction begins. At the time of this meeting the basic dam and cut-off trench position will
be established.
4. The reader of this report must recognize that pond or lagoon placement decisions are very important.
Minimizing earth moving and also putting the pond in the best soil types are important
considerations. Subsurface soil formations can change quickly. On occasion a better or more
appropriate site is discovered during early construction which dictates final pond placement and/or
shape. The engineer reserves the right to make such adjustments in construction so as to maximize
pond construction ease and safety. Changes to plans will be shown in the as-built drawings if
required.
5. The owner of TWF may wish for additional earth moving work to be done at the farm that is
unrelated to the earthen lagoon dam repairs. Such work must be authorized by the owner and
supervision of such work will be the responsibility of someone other than the engineer.
b. Sandy, loamy, or highly organic soils can only be used in the outer 12 inches of dam surface fill.
r Topsoil should be placed on the outer face of the dam for vegetation growing purposes. The highest
clay content soils should be used to make the wet (inside) side of the dam.
' 7. When construction is taking place, do only manageable segments of the:dam at a time.
Earth Moving Estimates
' It is impractical and unnecessary to try and predict earth moving volumes for this project.
SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES
General
r1. The purpose of sediment and erosion control measures is to confine sediment within the construction
area. This means the contractor should construct physical barriers, obstacles, or structures to insure
' sediment and soil is retained on the construction site. This task includes repairs of disturbed soils,
erosion scars, and damaged erosion control devices.
2. Generally, the contractor should install sediment control traps and sediment fences where appropriate
before or just after construction begins. Plant vegetation in all water conveying ditches as soon as
possible. Roughen all sloped surfaces and stabilize as soon as possible with vegetation.
3. The contractor and/or.engineers and/or surveyor should mark, flag, or designate the construction
.areas so all understand the intended work areas. This shall take place at or before the pre-
construction conference.
17

'I'riple W.Farms
Slormwater Storage Pond. April 200
r4. Rainfall run-off from the buildings and/or surrounding areas shall be diverted away from the pond
area if possible. Specific erosion control devices are shown in Drawing 1.
' 5. Sediment removed from sediment control devices shall be stored in stable areas not subject to re-
enter the sediment control devices or escape off site. This also applies to top soil stored or any
temporary soil storage areas. Silt fencing should be installed on the down slope side of stock piled or
' stored soils and along the base of disturbed earthen embankments.
6. Gullies, ditches, moved stone, tarn fence; or similar areas of erosion shall be given immediate
' attention and corrective action.taken. Control devices that do not seem to be adequately preventing
sediment transport shall be improved to stop soil transport.
' 7. Silt fencing is useful in many circumstances, but very often it is incorrectly used as the only means of
sediment and erosion control. Only use silt fencing where it is appropriate. Silt fencing should be
used on the down slopensides of disturbed areas, such as at the toe of a dam, earthen embankments,
' and at piles of stored soils if wind-rows are not present. Silt fencing should not be used as the only
sediment control for large areas of soil disturbance or in grass water ways with potential for high
velocity water streams. Hang silt fencing on wooden ormetal posts well anchored into the soil. Do
' not allow sediment to flow under'loose fitting silt fencing. Anchor the bottoms of slit fences in the
soil and clean out small sumps or pools just in front of the fences to allow for sediment build-up.
Liquid heads over 1.5 feet high will likely damage silt fencing. See Drawing 1 for details on silt
fence placement and Exhibit 7 for installation details.
8. Maintain 15 feet vegetative buffers between disturbed areas and property boundaries.
9. The contractor shall use good judgment and common sense to install sediment and erosion control
measures where needed. The contractor's judgment will be of the up-most importance.
10. Grading shall take place on the minimum amount of land necessary io do a specific task. Work
should be done in phases or sections if at all possible; sections stabilized:and work started in another
portion of the site.
11. The grading contractor shall work on the dam in such a manner that works in cooperation with
existing topography and soil conditions. Questionable soils or rocks shall be addressed with the
owners(s) and the engineer before construction continues.
' 12. Exterior earthen bank slopes that are steeper than 4:1 and will need long term maintenance are
discouraged unless absolutely necessary. Slopes 3:1 or steeper are difficult to mow and maintain.
13. On fill slopes other than dams leave the soil uncompacted if they are not subject to construction
traffic. Remove only large roots, stumps, or rocks from the fill on these slopes or any debris that
' would interfere with planting or maintenance.
14. On steep slopes (more than 3:1) clean most debris, roots, stumps, etc. from the site. Incorporate soil
test lime recommendations into the soil with a disk or tiller. Roughen surfaces on the contours.
r15. On less steep slopes (less than 3:1) clean debris, roots, stumps, etc, from the site. Incorporate soil
test lime recommendations into the soil with a disk or tiller. Roughen surfaces on the contours,
perpendicular to the surface flow of water.
' 16: Where applicable, apply stored top soil back to final grade over disturbed soils.
18
r

Triple W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond. April 2013
Temporary Sediment Trap Maintenance
1. Work on the new pond will likely take about 30 days or less to complete. Since the pond will
eventually catch sediment from the surrounding area no permanent sediment and erosion control
device is needed.
2. All attempts shall.be made to divert routine stormwater around the work site so it does not pick up
sediment from disturbed soil areas or so the pond' does not accumulate water. Said "non-
construction" stormwater can exit the site without going through a sediment and erosion control
' structure. Only the construction site stormwater need go through a sediment trap.
3. Any temporary sediment and erosion control structures shall be maintained throughout the life if
' their duty cycle. Clean out sediment as needed, repair torn or damaged silt fencing or partitions, rock
dam movement, etc. The owner and/or contractor should inspect the structure any time there is a
significant rainfall. Channeling under or around sediment control structures should be repaired
' immediately to prevent further damage or short-circuiting.
4. The land owner may remove temporary sediment and erosion control structures once the site is well
' vegetated and all disturbed soil is stabilized.
5. See Drawing 1 for details for temporary sediment control measures.
1
' DISTURBED SOIL STABILIZATION
Grass planting and maintenance are also critical parts of standard erosion control measures. Selected
suggestions and seeding recommendations below were taken in part from-the "Erosion And Sediment
Control Planning And Design Manual", published by the North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources, Land Quality Section.
' The job will not be considered complete until grass has been established on all disturbed soil, including
the interior and outer surface of the dam, any borrow areas, or similarly disturbed sites. This means that
the grass must be planted and germinated. Small erosion scars or pot-holes will need to be repaired and
' grassed before the job will be considered complete.
Site Preparation:
1. Once excavations are complete, spread topsoil back over the disturbed areas.
2. Once all heavy earth moving is complete, smooth the site as mentioned earlier in this package.
' 3. Fill possible channels and depressions in the disturbed soil, making every effort to keep surface
flows spread out across a wide area. Roughen steep surfaces with equipment treads.
Seedbed Preparation:
1. In general, prepare a seedbed that is about 3 inches deep. Lightly roughen surfaces to disrupt
channeling and to provide a good soft seedbed. Scarify the surface of the soil. Do not cut large
channels in the soil with scarifying equipment. Typically make all soil disturbances parallel to the
surface contours (i.e. perpendicular to the direction of stormwater flows).
19

' 'Triple W.Farms
Siormwater Storage Pond. April 2013
' Seeding Suggestions:
' 1. There is no more important function for stabilizing a construction site than to plant vegetation soon
as possible after soil disturbance has ended. It is best to sample and test soils for liming and fertilizer
suggestions. Send soil samples to the N.C. Department of Agriculture, Plant, Waste & Tissue Lab,
4300 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, N.C. 27607. Sample containers and forms can be obtained at the
Randolph County Cooperative Extension Service in Asheboro.
2. When final grading is complete, Permanent Seeding will be required. Soil stabilization shall occur
' within 15 working days of final construction or within 60 calendar days. The engineer recommends
seeding the site within a 7 days of final grading.
' 3. Most contractors have their own seeding mixtures they have found works well in their local areas.
The contractor may choose his own mixture of seeds for soil stabilization or use the below tables.
4. Grass seeding options aie shown in Tables 8, 9, and 10. The contractor shall not use Sericea
' Lespedeza, Crown Vetch and/or Weeping Lovegrass on the stormwater storage pond dam
since these types of vegetation encourage burrowing animal habitat, are difficult to maintain,
and inhibit visual inspections of the dam. This seeding shall be of a nature to satisfy the soil type
and in accordance with the time of year. This seeding mix can also be of a mixture the contractor
chooses and knows to work well with the soil type and season, but shall be coordinated with the
engineer in advance of seeding.
' TABLE 8
Temporary Seeding Suggestions for temporary vegetative cover):
Fall,Winter or Early S r n : Summer:
' Rye (grain), German Millet,
Applied @ 50 to 120 lbs/acre Applied @ 40 lbs/acre
*Also see Exhibit 5 for alternate temporary seeding recommendations.
' TABLE 9 **
Permanent Seeding Suggestions (Piedmont NC):
' Grass lined channels (Exhibit Tall Fescue @ 35 lb./acre (4-5 lb./ 1,000 sq. ft.)
5 -Seeding No 5P):
' Steep slopes Tall Fescue @ 100 lb./acre, plus Sericea Lespedeza@ 30 lbs./acre,
Exhibit 6 - Seeding No. 1P : plus Kobe Les edeza P. 10 lbs./acre *
Less steep slopes Blend of Tall Fescue (90 %) plus improved Kentucky Bluegrass
' Exhibit 7 - Seedin No 3P : 101/Ko l50 - 250 lbs./acre
Note: * SER.ICEA LESPEDEZA SHOULD NOT BE PLANTED ON DAMS.
** Also see Exhibit 6 for medium range seeding recommendations.
20

' -rdplc W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond. April 2013
' TABLE 10
Permanent Seeding Suggestions (Coastal Plain NC, Low maintenance):
' Grass lined channels and Common Bermuda Grass @ 40-80 lb./acre (1-2 lbs./ 1000 sq. ft.).
other areas (Exhibit 14 - Caution: Do not plant bermuda grass where it can get into .
Seeding No. 7CP): agricultural fields and become a pest. Centipede grass can be used
as an alternative but it will take a long time to become established.
Establish Centipede grass @ 10-20 lb./acre (seed) or 33 bushels/acre
' (sprigs).
On earthen dams (Exhibit 15 Mix of. Pensacola Bahia grass @ 50 lb./acre
- Seeding No. 5CP without Centipede grass @ 5 lb./acre
' the Sericea Les edeza) German Millet 10 lb./acre
Note: * SERICEA LESPEDEZA SHOULD NOT BE PLANTED ON DAMS.
' 4. Seeded areas shall be re-seeded if necessary to insure good stands of vegetation are developed and
maintained. Fertilization and mulch shall be installed as necessary.
' 5. Apply seed with a broadcast method, such as-a cyclone seeder, drop spreader, drill (in some cases),
etc. Hydra-seeding may be used but is not being specified.
' 6. Rake over all sites to assure seed has been covered and lightly packed in place. Lightly water if
water is available (only enough to moisten-soil).
Fertilizing And Lime Suggestions:
1. If soil tests are not available, apply 5,000 pounds of lime per acre at or just before planting. Use
ground agricultural limestone.
' 2. Fertilize using 10-10-10 fertilizer at 1,000 pounds per acre at planting. :Later fertilize according to
soil testing and experience.
' Mulch Suggestions:
1. On steep slopes (greater than 3:1) apply approximately 100 pounds of straw per 1,000 square feet of
' surface or use a Coir Fabric cover. Cover straw with a netting or use some other suitable adhesive
material to hold straw in place. If asphalt is used apply at roughly a rate of I 1 gallons per 1000
square feet of surface.
' 2. On less steep slopes (less than 3:1)'apply approximately 90 pounds of straw per 1,000 square feet of
surface or use a Coir Fabric cover. Cover straw with a netting or use some other suitable adhesive
material to hold straw in place. Mulch may not be needed on relatively flat surfaces.
3. If grass lined channels are necessary, they are sometimes difficult to get stabilized because of the
' velocity of flowing water. Often water velocities exceeding 2 feet per second on bare soil channels
will cause erosion scars. In many cases, the previous recommendations (shown above for mulch and
seeding) are sufficient to get a cover established, however if not, use an excelsior mat (e.g. Curlex
' Blanket or Coir Fabric cover) to line the channel and secure according to manufacturers
recommendations. Seed all exposed areas and mulch as necessary. Make slopes of grass lined
channels as gentle as possible. Use drop boxes if necessary to lessen steep slopes.
21
1

'triple W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond. April 2013
Maintaining Vegetation:
e I. After final grading,and permanent vegetation is well established, maintain good covers with mowing
and fertilizing. Annually collect soil samples for analysis and follow fertilizer and lime
recommendations. Fertilize and lime native grasses around the site and keep existing ground cover
' intact as much as possible. Maintain natural water ways and ditches. Plant new cover grasses as
necessary.
2. If soil tests are not available, apply 40 pounds of nitrogen per acre in January or February,40 pounds
' in September, and another 40 pounds in November from a 12-4-8 or 16-4-8' fertilizer. Avoid
fertilization in warm weather since this may encourage disease.
' 3. Mow grass as desired and in accordance with accepted practices. Usually mow grass to a height of
2.5 to 3.5 inches. Typically, mow vegetation at two times per year. Grass water-way vegetation
may need to be mowed more often if growth exceeds 14 to 16 inches tall. Grass may also be grazed
' once properly established.
4. Repair mulch and seed beds as necessary if areas of dead grass develop or erosion scars occur.
' 5. Use pesticides and herbicides only as a last resort to keep grass stands healthy. Use housekeeping
techniques to control insects along with or instead of pesticides.
6. Vegetation should be maintained until such time as,the waters of Randleman Lake reach full pool.
EMBANKMENT MAINTENANCE
' Details on long term embankment maintenance will be discussed in the "As-Constructed" document
after the modifications are complete.
STORAGE POND MANURE MAINTENANCE
Details on long term manure maintenance will be discussed in the "As-Constructed" document after the
' modifications are complete.
CONTROL PROGRAMS FOR TWF
' Details on insect control and odor control for waste storage ponds will be discussed in the "As-
Constructed" document after the modifications are complete.
' PERSONAL SAFETY AROUND LAGOONS AND WASTE STORAGE PONDS
' Details on safety issues associated with animal waste storage structures will be discussed in the "As-
Constructed" document after the modifications are complete.
' EMERGENCY ACTION PLANS
Details on an emergency action plan associated with the animal waste storage pond will be discussed in
the "As-Constructed" document after the modifications are complete. Be it noted that should there be an
' emergency with the new dam, the farm owner is to immediately call the NC Dam Safety engineers at
800-858-0368.
22
1

Triple W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond. April 2013
' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND NOTICES
Any person or company owning or controlling the property upon which an intensive livestock operation
exists shall be responsible for all aspects of the waste management. The system must be maintained at
all times to prevent direct seepage and/or discharge of effluent to the surface of ponds, rivers, streams, or
' to any type of surface or ground waters.
Triple W. Farms is hereby notified that he/she/they must operate this system in accordance with state and
local laws and regulations. Problems should be reported to the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
' ASAP. The telephone number of the regional office of DWQ, Winston Salem,N.C. - [phone].
The DWQ emergency phone for after hours in Raleigh is 1-800-858-0368.
Changes in animal steady state live weight, operations, ownership, and/or waste management must first
1 be discussed with DWQ before proceeding. This is not an option for the farmer but a requirement.
Significant changes in operations, or problems should be duly noted and documented by the farmer.
' The EES engineer cannot take responsibility for the accuracy of all information or conclusions made by
others and referenced herein. Much of the information presented above is based on estimated
' conditions, estimated operational capabilities, etc. that are subject to change. When dealing with so
many variables and natural elements it is impossible to predict in advance all operational conditions,
however the concepts and methodology presented above are reliable. The information above is
' presented in a detailed fashion so that system operators can recalculate and adjust certain parameters
during the day-to-day operations.
The engineer takes no responsibility for changes made to the above details before, during, or after
' construction without his knowledge. Nor does the engineer take any responsibility for human losses or
property damages which should occur due to poor workmanship, improper use of machinery, unknown
conditions above or below ground level, legal problems with boundary lines'.or easements, acts of nature,
' "short-cuts" the owner may take in system construction, or improper system,operation. Information
given to the engineer by the owner or others and used in these specifications`shall be taken as truth if it
cannot be verified otherwise.
DWQ officials and local health officials are authorized to inspect the system at any time.
The farm owner must keep a copy of this certified report on the farm at all times. He or she must adhere
1 to these plans as much as is possible. Alterations in waste management practices shall at no time violate
the intent of this plan.
This document does not contain all specifications, rules, and laws associated with the land application
and management of animal waste. Copies of such guidelines and documentation can be obtained at the
local NRCS office, the regional office of DWQ, or from the Cooperative Extension Service.
' When the pond construction is complete, as-constructed information will be supplied to DWQ that
shows how the pond was ultimately built. The specifications seen above are guidelines for construction.
***END OF STORMWA TERIWA STE STORAGE POND SPECIFICATIONS
1
23

1 'I'riple W.Farms
Stormwater Storage Pond. Apri12013
1
1
EXHIBITS SECTION

MAP Joins Map 21
38 ]9.394U• A 79'25'00' B 79.2600• C 74'15'W' D 79110104•
r.. t v -� 1r Hr }a7• \� ¢9 0 � Ufl rniNN15
`�� �Q( A J 90 ,�'25 07 4c'r$• �q �� `TLC pF L�Jp` SA (y1119 ��t� �y .' o� � y pz
' E' � r,•_•,77 M pUl• z1t6: ^` ♦ � 7y m r � Tl' ALB V .!
U(rSS 7 F v �'I`�o R4 7 s Fl. Gruvs ly Dodscns [, naa.,
. / A Pa P Tuer `Z r
0112� n4 ( �'"1 }�I-L � �O ,._ `� � ( Crossrcads O R0 T
9p {V.-.� o P°
SE e$ '�• �j f7F7'I` � w VI BFTRLERF Oaks ,,'Q'p TEEN W w
2 F 49 ' ' " a Y 9 AT'7 P H PO 77s ,�P�EO D1lI'1o111 TK1p$ ® q ~` 1l�r p
Iz Rr=L 7�~v, VyP00 HO
�{ ' 'q � .C, SaKspahaw o p40P Cal andar O(
F � i .a METE Ft
H4
Croak tfO 1` .. j r li. MpRp, \�� Crass
.c F
C"9°��r
Sr 5` S C4
� � �P 5ourwoad i APEL + eY RO � v vdo- 2
pOr�`f `NEfrySBORQ c Foresl �d�'OAEtiK5n0P4 1005 RD H14 '. �,� L•`tJ,},�! orb ,I f,
1w, OLD cg GnEEN5SOR0 q0
Lin,py 97 �-. �.. ,^T
Mill v Jt I FOUTDALL 1095 ESSy \�ti.
•� 1t •Sn"uw,Camp f. f x[ y T T v
PLk S`4 tNURLN Pa I �__v r'C` L� k �S•` O q U \ w v
47
I O lY 207
4 �
8Fq Damascus ,y x O � PERRY �nD _•"', � '� zp �s
2797 ^r lip �RM � ilavan
237p � � � � � = RUS3FLi R0 1jOY f,: y '•y �� i r�
GREEN rvo3 Mandela zr07 I p4igy }h55 no - a CIiPPEL
VINT 20�1 aq tI l7NO1FY
SPL f `/-�� �Ty �` 1525 PARKER
Terrails O I ;HERNDON 4
HOPE L 5E y0 z aP i I �Pli c p CAST K1 O 52g j np 2 S p4
dy Crutch{iold g a - FARM RD O
v� gFaorrinp
ISa9 �i 8 q'•`'_ -_ _ S�kAP a$ ¢ �'yill�
He ENDE R SO-NkOPF ./R D!!8Fg7y / 1550
c EPPS S��'���_•,• .A_J �� AR0 \�_ o`�O�Zzp2 p9 r 575
Silk Hope SILKURADYS41
53511 1746 HOPE Gl im SPRNGS Bynum
B'yPOH�
,.
R'IO.
CE
1570
DY P 3
,.. Q
T 64
i� 2Slx, z ,� x � 3 — 87
.4
!Pl[15boro A
Cc
Ir d 4 {T s f c
�. ��e° c, L eRrppf PLS}Dly i i� CHAPEL�..1-•"'"'-�''
a'
2139
o SAM �5 9Gc I �f k G6
}} I
•w•,�'1i o
—qq —•so—R� ��Y - off'--}I' _':r��.,_,_
` .,noli .3y MCV• 1N Y}15 J"-.•"
'MOUNT f�- springy'J 5� VI[VJ CRU OJT:w' la SPRSNG9 tr'" �- Banlaa 2 OC SN RCR Pq O�
0 9 f I �. 1 �M4UI�P t955
RD ELMv-" MOOAE. 6 OOCF MRON7ES 020 a T' S' I
ii� p0 O RO � Z! C` 0-- J', i �i rc•. I S
q•,sr �g4.sd }0D' (O �.I- d) 'Yp f�`�`' --� �,� >�r N r ,, 501
{r
., 1493 �- _ _ CHAPEL �'•\ 113•/'
21gg 0 ! 1 1 1 -
' = EXHIBIT I �. - ;,:•_
TRIPLE ' W. FARMS VICINITY MAPP°
11
Scale of Road Maps 9 = 3 Miles
yril 5 0 5 10 15 Milos
5 0 5 10 15 24.Kilomelors m

1 N
EXHIBIT 2 - TRIPLE W. FARMS
1 CONTOURS ARE AT 10 FT. INTERVALS -
521
SCALE IS SHOWN ON BOTTOM OF THE MAP,
MAP DATE - 1980.
J �.• , f r.
� j 1� ```�` / 'r. '�� �� f �S 1 t � r�f. I r^� L�i • /! r f i
ar rj��f ~✓ � �r � ,��/c,_ r�%L �' w� 1 -�!11 ��•tJ 1 r{
fy
+ / i,v
10
IT Whi
�• �� , :� J /r I / fi 5 . r i
r ��r17r • f �'I `1 ��r 1r� �.��_� / •r ,��`� 1`� !i� t �i �',_ �`' I (��' ,1 I _!
1 f ,i � !w-;.. /r •�� � � _ � I � r 41 \t l i��l� � �� �'� \ u.,'!�`; \,y\r t.
/ �•�\ - Imo. _f.• f '11 r� + / ,�, \ r--�`;i 1 1`.. l�I I,_'!�� f
1 '_'�� - -� i-• �� it '' `. ;� i r y ---`'� � �.=�� � � \� 1 �'� f---'�'
-N. Ij _ N,� \r+ mot} I f1 `
3-D TopoQuada Copyright A 1999 Del.orme Yarmouth,ME 04096 Source Data:USGS 50 ft Seale:1:16,000 Detail:14-0 Datum:WCS84
1

1
EXHIBIT 4
Triple W Farm - Proposed Stormwater Storage Pond
V olume vs. Depth
1
3,600,000
1 3,400,000 --d—L MAX MUM ru�L�-POINT OF 0 RFLOW
ME VOLU APPROX. 3,380,Q90 GALLONS
3,200,000
-ell
tl, TA
2,800;ao0 -
EMERGENCY STORAGE FORIONE 25 YEAR-24 HOUR STORM
1 2,600,000 --- - — -.- VOLUME_APPROX..�l,.576,.000_GALZ.ONS
2,400,000
C
2,200,000
1 W 2,000,000
L
1 #0 1,800,000 «..- .—• - __1,_80.4,_00.0_GALLo S
aoc
000,600,
1
1
1,400,000
1,200,000
1 1,000,000 �-- --F - - --- Qi
---� L'IQUI MANAGEMENT ZONE
600,000
1 400,000 -- --- — -- — _.— - .
I 5.51FEE7 BELOW
OVERFLOW INVERT
1 200,000
' a =
0 2 4 6' 8 10 12 14 16 18
Feet Below Overflow level
1 (All Values On This Graph Are Approximate) — �-�
POND EMPTY HERE
1

' Pruclice Slaaaalarrls and Specificralions
EXHIBIT 5
' Table 6.10b Seeding mixture
Temporary Seeding Species Rate(Iblacre)
Recommendations for German millet 40
Summer
In the Piedmont and Mountains, a small-stemmed Sudangrass may be
substituted at a rate of 50 lb/acre.
Seeding dates
Mountains—May 15-Aug. 15
Piedmont—May 1 -Aug. 15
Coastal Plain—Apr. 15-Aug. 15
' Soil amendments
Follow recommendations of soil tests or apply 2,000 lb/acre ground
agricultural limestone and 750 lb/acre 10-10-10 fertilizer.
' Mulch
Apply 4,000 lb/acre straw. Anchor straw by tacking with asphalt,netting,
' or a mulch anchoring tool. A disk with blades set nearly straight can be
used as a mulch anchoring tool.
Maintenance
' Refertilize if growth is not fully adequate. Reseed, refertilize and mulch
immediately following erosion or other damage.
1
G.I U.5
1

EXHYBYT 6
HERBACEOUS PLAuTS-Seeding recommendations:for immediate stabiiizationlnLlrse crops
(2 to 5 weeks for development; effectiveness goal: 6 months to 1'year stabilization). Table 6.1 1.a
NURSE CROP SPECIES
Optimal Ptanting Dates
Fer"L-fiorJ .
Hative l Se,dey flare iksrestone - Coastal Sun/Shade Plpa"n hwasi-m instaliation l Mainterrarnoe -
Common Name eotanicat Name Introduced baaaa tbs/acre ulotrrterre. Pseanont Pbir% tolerant Wetlands Buffers .Yes or No Considerations .Other infomtation,oommerria
Rye Grain Secale aereale 1 40 fin By soil test- 1111-4130 8715-4/15 8115-4115 Sur Yes Yes No Must be mown to reduce -
with
oerrtwnent or lorvq term
vecietation
wheat Tntioum aesovum I 30 tits a Xs0a tell . 1111 4430 81.15=511 8115-4115 Sun Yes Yes No Must be mown to reduce Not water tolerant be used
competitiveness with in vmdands that are not
- - - iierd or bN term continuously saturated.. .
- Son.
Gemtan Mittel Setarla ltatica 1 10 Ebs By soil test'. 5111-,913 5115-611 15-8115 Sun Yes. Yes .No C should be cut 1 disc. Not water tolerant be used
prier to ntinoprirrory or in wetlands that are not
iortd term veoetation f contiriuotrsly saturated.
Brown Millet Urochloa ramosa .1 10 Ibs, By soil test% 5111-MO 5115-.6115 4115-6115 Sun Yes Yes No C �sttoutd be ctrt 1 dsc Not water toterarit. may be used
- prioftopja6ti prime or. in wetlands that are not
term tat on continuously saturated.
Sudanorass h txids Sorghum saocharatum 1 15 Ibs 8 soil test Nil' NR 115-W15 'Sun No No Yes Crop should be'cul I oak Use onf where p6rits and seed
S.-bicolor ssp.DnAmmondi ar tn'p6nd rino!yor can tie contained and controlled.
lonci term Veoetation
Kobe Lespedeza Kumrnerowia sL-iafa v.kobe 1 10 tbs By soil test. 511-911 '.511-911 511-911' Sun No No No Consult 6ualified Use in Coastal Plain
horliczrlluiali$t or extension
agent for over-seeding
withp6mary cover
Korean Lespedeza Kumrnerowia sfr ulacea ' t 10 ft BY soil test 511-911 511 911 .511.-911 Sun No No No Consult qWdified. t}se in Piedmont and
horticUlturat'st or extonsicn Mountains.May become
agent for over-s6eding invasive
wild ornary cover .
r .
L'l t
l S
NOTES:
1. Seeding rates are for huned seed unless oSherwse noted.
2. Fertili<er 8 Limestone-rates to be applied in absense of soils tests. Rocontrnonded application race assumes significantly disturbed site soils with little or no residual value.
i
3. NR mearts Species not recohvrertdr°d for this region or applicatioh area.
4. Invasive designation as determined by the N.C.Exotic Pest Pant Council and N.C.Native Plant Society.
5. Sprigging is not rec orryne-rided for imrnedmie stabilization unless terrain is flat heavy nwich is applied and no other imrnedia:e stabilization method is practical.

1
' EXHIBIT 7 Practice Standards and Specifications
6.62
Definition A temporary sediment control measure consisting of fabric buried at the
bottom,stretched,and supported by posts.
Purpose To retain scdimcnt from small disturbed areas by reducing the velocity of
' sheet flows to allow sediment deposition.
Conditions Where Below small-disturbed areas that are less then A acre per 100 feet of fence.
' Practice Applies Where runoff can be stored behind the sediment fence without damaging the
fence or the submerged area behind the fence.
c
' Do not install sediment fences across streams, ditches, or waterways, or
other areas of concentrated flow.
Sediment fence should be placed along topographic elevation contours,where
it can intercept stormwater runoff that is in dispersed sheet flow. Sediment
fence should not be used alone below graded slopes greater than M feet in
height,
' Planning A sediment.fence is a system to retain sediment on the construction site. The
fence retains sediment primarily by retarding flow and promoting deposition.
Considerations In operation, generally the fence becomes clogged with fine particles,which
' reduce the flow rate. This causes a pond to develop behind the fence. The
designer should anticipate pending and provide sufficient storage areas and
overflow outlets to prevent flows from overtopping the fence. Since sediment
fences are not designed to withstand high water levels, locate them so that
only shallow pools can form. Tie the ends of asedi.ment fence into higher
ground to prevent flow around the end of the fenct abefore the pool reaches
design level. Curling each end of the fence uphill,in'a "!" pattern may be
appropriate to prevent end flow. Provide stabilized,outlets to protect the fence
system and release storm flows that exceed the design storm.
Deposition occurs as the storage pool forms behind the fence. The designer can
direct flows to specified deposition areas through appropriate positioning of
' the fence or by providing an excavated area behind the fence. Plan deposition
areas at accessible points to promote routine cleanout and maintenance. Show
deposition areas in the erosion and sedimentation control plan. A sediment
1 fence acts as a diversion if'placed slightly off the contour. A maximum slope
of 2 percent is recommended. This technique may be used to control shallow,
uniform flows from small disturbed areas and to deliver sediment-laden water
to deposition areas. The anchoring of the toe of the fence should be reinforced
' with 12 inches of NC DOT#5 or 457 washed stone when flow will run parallel
to the toe of the fence.
Sediment fences serve no function along ridges or near drainage divides where
' there is little movement of water. Confining or diverting runoff unnecessarily
with a sediment fence may create erosion and sedimentation problems that
would not otherwise occur.
' Rev.6/06 6,62.1
1

1
Straw barriers have only a 0-20%trapping efficiency and are inadequate.Straw
' bales may not be used in place of'sedintent fence. Prefabricated sediment fence
with the fabric already stapled to thin wooden posts does not meet minimum
standards specified later in this section.
' Anchoring of sediment fence is critical. The toe of the fabric must be anchored
in a trench backfilled with compacted earth. Mechanical compaction must be
provided in order for the fence to effectively pond runoff.
' Design Criteria Ensure that drainage area is no greater than %,acre per 100 feet of fence. This
is the maximum drainage area when the slope is less than 2 percent. Where
all runoff is to be stored behind the fence, ensure that the maximum slope
length behind a sediment fence does not exceed the specifications shown in
Table 6.62a. The shorter slope length allowed for steeper slopes will greatly
reduce the maximum drainage area. For example,a 10--20%slope may have
4 a maximum slope length of 25 feet. For a 100-foot length of sediment fence,
' the drainage area would be 25ft X I00ft=2500sq.ft.,or 0.06 acres.
Table 6.62a Maximum Slope Slope Length (ft) Maximum Area(ft')
Slope Length and Slope for <2% 100 10,000
which Sediment Fence is 2 to 5% 75 7,500
Applicable 5 to 10% 50 5,000
10 to 20% 25 2,500
' >20%v 15 1,500
Make the fence stable for the 10-year peak storm runoff.
' Ensure that the depth of impounded water does not exceed 1.5 feel at any point
along the fence.
If non-erosive outlets are provided, slope length may be increased beyond
' that shown in Table 6.62a,but runoff from the area should be determined and
bypass capacity and erosion potential along the fence"�must be checked. The
velocity of the flow at the outlet or along the fence should be in keeping with
Table 8.05d,Appendix 8.05.
Provide a riprap splash pad or other outlet protection device for any point
where flow may overtop the sediment fence, such as natural depressions or
' swales. Ensure that the maximum height of the fence at a protected,reinforced
outlet does not exceed 2 feet and that support post spacing does not exceed 4
feet.
The design life of a synthetic sediment fence should be 6 months.
'
COr1StrLICtiOn MATERIALS
1. Use a synthetic filter fabric of at least 95% by weight of polyolefins or
' Specifications polyester,which is certified by the manufacturer or supplier as conforming to
the requirements in ASTM D 6461,which is shown in part in Table 6.62b.
Synthetic filter fabric should contain ultraviolet ray inhibitors and stabilizers
' to provide a minimum of 6 months of expected usable construction life at a
temperature range of 0 to 120'F.
6.62.2 Rev.6/06
1

1
' Practice Standards and Specifications
2. Ensure that posts for sediment fences are 1.33 lb/linear ft steel with
' a minimum length of 5 feet. Make sure that steel posts have projections to
facilitate fastening the fabric.
3. For reinforcement of standard strength filter fabric,use wire fence with a
minimum 14 gauge and a maximum mesh spacing of 6 inches.
Table 6.62b Specifications For Sediment Fence Fabric
' Temporary Silt Fence Material Property Requirements
Supported' Un-Supported' Type of
Test Material Units Silt Fence Silt Fence Value
Grab Strength ASTM D 4632 N(lbs)
' Machine Direction 400 550 MARV
(90) (90)
X-Machine Direction 400 450 MARV
(90) (90)
Permittivity' ASTM D 4491 soc-1 0.05 0.05 MARV
Apparent Opening Size' ASTM D 4751 mm 0.60 0.60 Max.ARV'
' (US Sieve 4) (30) (30)
% 70%after 70%after
Ultraviolet Stability ASTM D 4355 Retained 500h of exposure 500h of exposure Typical
' Strength
'Silt Fence support shall consist of 14 gage steel wire with a mesh spacing of 150 mm(6 inches),or prefabricated poylmer mesh of
equivalent strength.
'These default values are based on empirical evidence with a variety of sediment. For environmentally sensitive areas,a review of
previous experience and/or site or regionally specific geotextile tests in accordance with Test Method D 5141 should be performed
' by the agency to confirm suitability of these requirements.
'As measured in accordance with Test Method D 4632.
CONSTRUCTION
1. Construct the sediment barrier of standard istrength or extra strength
synthetic filter fabrics.
2. Ensure that the height of the sediment fence does not exceed 24 inches
' above the ground surface. (higher fences may impound volumes of water
sufficient to cause failure of the structure.)
3. Construct the filter fabric from a continuous roll cut to the length of the
' barrier tb avoid joints. When joints arc necessary, securely fasten the filler
cloth only at a support post with 4 feet minimum overlap to the next post.
4. Support standard strength filter fabric by wire mesh fastened securely to
the upslope side of the posts. Extend the wire mesh support to the bottom of
the trench. Fasten the wire reinforcement, then fabric on the upslope side of
the fence post. Wire or plastic zip ties should have minimum 50 pound tensile
' Strength.
5. When a wire mesh support fence is used,space posts a maximum of 8 fbet
apart. Support posts should be driven securely into the ground a minimum of
' 24 inches.
6. Extra strength filter fabric with 6 feet post spacing does not require wire
mesh support fence. Securely fasten the filter fabric directly to posts. Wire or
plastic zip ties should have minimum 50 pound tensile strength.
1
Rev.6106 6.62.3

1
7. Excavate a trench approximately 4 inches wide and 8 inches deep along
' the proposed line of posts and upslope from the barrier(Figure 6.62a).
8. Place 12 inches of the fabric along[lie bottom and side of the trench.
' 9. Backfili the trench with soil placed over the filter fabric and compact.
Thorough compaction of the backfill is critical to silt fence performance.
10. Do not attach filter fabric to existing trees.
1. SEDIMENT FENCE INSTALLATION USING THE SLICING METHOD
Instead of excavating a trench, placing fabric and then backfilling trench,
sediment fence may be installed using specially designed equipment that
' inserts the fabric into a cut sliced in the ground with a disc(Figure 6.62b).
Installation 1. The base of both end posts should be at least one foot higher than the
middle of the fence. Check with a level if necessary.
Specifications
2. Install posts 4 feet apart in critical areas and 6 feet apart on standard
applications.
3. Install posts 2 feet deep on the downstream side of the silt fence, and
' as close as possible to the fabric, enabling posts to support the tabric from
upstream water pressure.
4. Install posts with the nipples facing away from the silt fabric;.
' 5. Attach the fabric to each post with three ties, all spaced within the top 8
inches of the fabric. Attach each tie diagonally 45 degrees through the fabric,
with each puncture at least l inch vertically apart. Also, each tie should be
' positioned to hang on a post nipple when tightened to prevent sagging,
6. Wrap approximately 6 inches of fabric around the end posts and secure
with 3 lies.
7. No more than 24 inches of a 36 inch fabric is allowed above ground
' level.
8. The installation should be checked and corrected for any deviations before
compaction.
' 9. Compaction is vitally important for effective results. Compact the sail
immediately next to the silt fence fabric with the front wheel of the tractor,
skid steer,or roller exerting at least 60 pounds per square inch. Compact the
upstream side first,and then each side twice for a total of 4 trips.
6.62,4 Rev.W06

Practice Standards and Specifications
8'max.standard strength fabric with wire fence
6*max,extra strength fabric-without wire fence
Steel
ost
till
T
1� Plastic or
4
wire ties
C.
Wire '24-
fence ri' 11T
Natural
Lpff. ffl
4 1 ground
T: MIT
in
%
5..'Al
..... ........
Filter
fabric
t +
Wire
fence Cross'-'se&ion
view.
Filter
Steel fabric Backfill trench Natural
post and compact ground
thoroughly
Upslope
'
min
T
81
min
in
V
Figure 6.62a Installation detail of a sediment fence.
Rev.5/08 6.62.5

1
' The Slicing Method
' Ponding height POST SPACING:
max,24' 6.'max.on open runs
.............. ... ................Top of Fabric
4'max.on pooBng areas .
Belt
Attach ratx1c to 14
' upsiruam side of post tap 8"
FLOW 14
Drive over each side or slit Ar)RT nFPTH! �•
fence 2 to 4 times with
' device exerting 60 p.s.l.or 2 Net
greater
compacted soil ari compacted soil, Diagonal attachment
„ doubles strength.
ATEACHMEMDETAIIS:
s Gather fabric of posts.If needed.
•VKhe three lies
per post,all within tap 8"of fabric.
/
•Position each fie diagonally,puncturing Wasvertica4
a minimum of t'apart.
' •Hang each tie on post nipple and tighten securely.
No more than 24"ofa 36"fabric use cable ties(50ibs)or soft wire,
is allowed above ground.
x s:
Roll of silt fence
4. Operation
j Post
' irnstWed
after
compaction
Fabric
' O gta our SIEf Fence
' Horizontal chlsol point Sllcino blade
3"width.,_.h) 0.7" -i„idth)
Completed Installotlon
Vibratory plow is not acceptable because of horizontal compaction
Figure 6.62b Schematics for using the slicing method to install a sediment fence. Adapted from Silt Fence that Works
1
6.62.6 Rev.6106

1
END EXHIBIT 7 Practice Standards and Specifications
Maintenance Inspect sediment fences at least once a week and after each rainfall. Make any
required repairs immediately.
Should the fabric of a sediment fence collapse, tear, decompose or become
ineffective,replace it promptly.
' Remove sediment deposits as necessary to provide adequate storage volume
.for the next rain and to reduce pressure on the fence. 'fake care to avoid
undermining the fence during cleanout.
Remove.all fencing materials and unstable sediment deposits and bring the
area to grade and stabilize it after the contributing drainage area has been
properly stabilized.
References ASTM M D 6461—99. "Standard Specification for Silt Fence Materials" ASTM
International. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website,
www.astrn.org,or contact ASTM Customer Service at [e-mail]
Annual Book of ASTM Standards volume information,refer to the standard's
Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
ASTM D 6462—03. "Standard Practice for Silt Fence Installation" ASTM
International. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website,
www.astm.org,or contact ASTM Customer Service at [e-mail]
Annual Book of ASTM Standards volume information,refer to the standard's
Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
C. Joel Sprague, 'PE, Silt Fence Performance Limits and Installation
Requirements. Sprague and Sprague Consulting Engineers and TRY
Environmental,Inc.
Carpenter Erosion Control.http://wwNv.tommy-sfm.roav
Kentucky Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Field Manual,2004.
Runoff Control Measures *"
6.20,Temporary Diversions
Ou11et Prolection
6.41,Outlet Stabilization Structure
Appendix
8.03,Estimating Runoff
1
1 .
Rev.6106 6.62"7
1

1
EXHIBIT 8
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT
•-J
' 60
Dashed line indicates the approximate
upper limit boundary for natural soils
' O
50 `X Q�
G
40
z
q
U 30 —
O�
' 20— o�
CL•M ML or QL MH or OH
r
D
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
LIQUID LIMIT
' MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LL PL PI %- -0 %<i USCS
• Dark Onmge Silty Clay with Send 72 28 44 78.2 Cl i
' ■ Brown,Orange Silty Pat Clay. 55 24 31 74.4 CH
1
Project No. 19941 Client: Environmental EngineL ing Services Remarks:
' Project: Triple W.Farms _.
0source of Sample:Pit 1. Depth:0.00-0.00 Sample Number:S-1
ASource at Sample: Pit 2 Depth:0.00-0.00 Sample.Number:S-2
' ECS C-.r--.LAP
�Me em
Figure
' Tested By: AC Checked By:KR
1/
1

1
COMPACTION TEST REPORT For Curve No. S-1'
89
1
87
' 85.
83
81 — —
' —— ZAV for
Sp-G.=
2.65
79
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Water content,%
Test specificatlom ASTM D 698-07 Method B Standard
' Elev/ Classification. Nat. S G. LL PI %G> Goa
Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. p 318 in. No.200
' 0.00-0.00 CH 36.9 2.65 72 44 78.2
TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
' Maximum dry density=86.2 pcf Dark Orange Silty Clay with Sand
Optimum moisture=30.2%
Project No. 19941 Client: Environmental Engineering Services Remarks:
Project: Triple W.Farms
Date: 10/29/12
Source of Sam le:Pit 1 Sample Number:S-1
' ECS C.dlna.LLP
A-4,M MIA
�mn:rylry MIN10 r..rn4 w..u. Flgure
Tested By: KR Checked By: KR
1

i
END MIBIT 8
1
COMPACTION TEST REPORT For Curve No. S-2
100
98
6.3 cc
96 — —
1 �
94
92 w: —
ZAV for
——— 2.65
90
8 13 18 23 28 33 38
Water content,.%
Test specification: ASTM D 698-07 Method B Standard
1 Elev/ Classification Nat. g .G. LL PI %> %<
Depth USCS AASHTO Moist, p 3181n. No.200
' 0.00-0.00 CH 27.4 2.65 55 31 74.4
TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Maximum dry density =96.3.pcf Brown,Orange Silty Fitt Clay with Sand
' Optimum moisture=22.0%
Project No. 19941 Client: Environmental Engineering Services Remarks:
i Project: Triple W.Farms
Date: 10/29/12
Source of Sam ie:PU 2 Sample Number:S-2
ECSC..11 e.LLP
poi 61e�ae6 ern.•
���HG I1aie G nro+i',Ifl M1 Mi0 Fev191Ylemawe Figure
' Tested By: AC Checked By: KR

y
NC Department of
Environmental Quality
Received
NORTH CAROLINA OCT 0 5 2918
ROY COOPER Environmental Quality
covollw Winston-Salem
MICHAEL S.REGAN Regional Office
smwar)•
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim D#Mor
September 13, 2018
Harold G. Woody
Triple W Farm
3545 East Greensboro Chapel Hill Rd
Snow Camp,NC 27349
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWCO10010
Triple W Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Alamance County
Dear Harold G. Woody:
In accordance with your August 30, 2018 submittal of a completed phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT)
evaluation sheets required in the previous Certificate of Coverage(COC),we are hereby forwarding to you
this revised COC issued to Triple W Farm,authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) for Triple R Dairy Farm, located in Haywood County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than the following annual averages:
Dairy Calf: Dry Cow: Beef Brood Cow:
Dairy Heifer: 200 Beef Stocker Calf: Other:
Milk Cow: 400 Beef Feeder:
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWC010010 dated March 11, 2016. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified
in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility.
Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals
authorized by this COC (as provided above)will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and
must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
D_EQ22
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources IAFOGW Section
512 North Salisbury Street 11636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
919.707.9129

Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit_carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoriniz.conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site-specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Pennittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon,
storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties,criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days,this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning,Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may
find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National Weather
Service office at(919) 515-8209, or by visiting their website at: httn://www.weather.gov/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office
staff may be reached at 336-776-9800. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at(919) 707-9129.
Sincerely,
,for Linda Culpepper
Interim Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure(General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Alamance County Health Department
Alamance County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files(Permit No. AWCO10010)
R-7a $ 5 s67
Woody ��ofi�e S rre voc_ j 4-u5+
C.ro 6 eo r�j e- 14 .
3 y5 L t4s6

NC Department of PAT MCCRORY
Environmental Quality
�•. Received
Governor
MAR 15 2016 :.r DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Winston-Salem '> Secretnrt
r.
Water Resources `�' Regional Office " r S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
ENVIRONMCNTAL QUALITY
Directcr
March 11, 2016
Harold G. Woody
Triplw W Farm
3545 East Greensboro Chapel Hill Road
Snow Camp,NC 27349
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWCO10010
Triplw W Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Alamance County
Dear Harold G. Woody:
In accordance with your permit application received on February 5, 2016, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Harold G. Woody, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including,but not limited to,the management and
land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) for Triplw W Farm, located in Alamance County, with an animal capacity of no greater than the
following annual averages:
Dairy Calf: Dry Cow: Beef Brood Cow:
Dairy Heifer: 200 Beef Stocker Calf: Other:
Milk Cow: 400 Beef Feeder:
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this
COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the ~
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site-specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate you
will need to have a new WUP developed. Within 180 days of the issuance of this COC, The Permittee J
shall submit to this Division the phosphorus loss assessment(PLAT)ratings for Tract No 30637(Fields 7
1 through 6) that is included in the facility's WUP to evaluate the facility's ability to comply with the
NRCS nutrient management standard as it relates to phosphorus.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1636 Mail service Center I Raleigh,Notth Carolina 27699-1636
919 807 6464

i
The issuance of this COC does not excuse;the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws,rules,standards,and ordinances(local,'state,and federal);no.r,does issuance of a COC to operate under
this permit convey any property rights in either.real or personal property.'
Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon,
storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC,or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A
through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts,requirements,or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable,you have the right to apply
for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on this {
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit,waste application shall cease within four(4)hours
of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning, or a
Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may find
detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National Weather Service
office at(919) 515-8209, or by visiting their website at: http://www,weather, ovg� /rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Regional Office
staff may be reached at 336-776-9800. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit,please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at(919) 807-6464.
Sincerely,
for S. Jay Zimmerman,P.G.
Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure(General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for al I ces)
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Alamance County Health Department
Alamance County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Pern-ut No. AWCO10010)
j

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
P.O. Box 426,Aberdeen,N.C.28315 Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Email: [e-mail]
FAUG
VED
.of ENR
Mr. Harold Woody 4 2011 August 2, 2011
C/o Triple W. Farms, Inc. -Salem
3545 East Greensboro-Chapel Hill Road Regional office
Snow Camp,N.C. 27349
Subject: Manure storage pit design associated with dairy waste collection and containment at the
Triple W Farms location, Alamance County,North Carolina. ,
Dear Mr. Woody,
Per your request I am enclosing a final drawing(Drawing TWF 1.0) for the concrete manure storage pit
or "dry stack" that we have discussed. I am including this letter to accompany the drawing to explain
our intent and some of the design parameters. I will be brief if my explanations.
Triple W Farms (TWF) is a dairy operation in Alamance County NC. The farm has traditionally had a
scrape and haul program to manage most of its manure. TWF has been making improvements at the
farm by adding buildings and making plans to improve manure handling and management. About 12
months ago, TWF built a new 102 ft. x 317 ft. free-stall barn that contains basically 3 different areas
under the roof. These are: 1) a concrete area with lounging stalls and a feed bunker, 2) a wood shaving
area for the cows to rest, and 3) a bare dirt floor. The cows are free to come and go into and out of the
new free-stall anytime they are not milking or confined to a different pasture.
The new lounging stalls and feed bunker are surrounded by a concrete pad. The concrete pad and stalls
take up about 40% of the free-stall under roof area, with the remainder under-roof area being wood
shavings and bare ground. The cows tend to congregate under the new free-stall bam in summer and
winter and divide their time between the stalls, the wood shavings, and the pasture area around the
free-stall. Based on our previous discussions you think each cow spends an average of about 5 hours
per day on the concrete area under the free-stall roof.
TWF currently scrapes the accumulated manure off of the concrete pad and loads it onto a manure
spreader to transport to the fields. In order to facilitate TWF with its manure collection and storage you
have requested Environmental Engineering Services (EES)to design a manure holding pit at the end of
the concrete ramp. This new pit or manure dry stack will allow TWF a place to store the manure on a
daily basis until you are ready to land apply it onto crops. This will give TWF flexibility in their
manure management program and make it easier to adhere to the new nutrient management plan under
development.
Manure scraped or collected at other parts of the farm will continue to be handled via traditional
methods until such time as new collection and storage methodology can be established. The new dry
stack will be used primarily to store the scraped manure from around the free-stalls. The new dry stack
is only a part of the long term manure collection and management program at TWF.

Below in Table 1, the reader can see the overall design guidelines for estimating manure storage
capabilities of the new dry stack. The reader will also keep in mind that TWF would like to eventually
expand their herd size from current numbers. Table I shows 3 different herd sizes and how many days
of storage would be available within the proposed dry stack. Please remember that TWF must be
permitted by DWQ for a certain number of animals before growing the herd. So please do not exceed
your permitted herd size until you have this change accounted for in your permit. Table 1 simply
shows the three herd sizes you requested.
TABLE 1
WASTE STORAGE CAPACITY IN THE NEW DRY STACK AT TRIPLE W FARMS
Animal Type Cubic Feet Of Number Of Time These Cubic Cubic Feet Estimated Estimated
According To Dairy Paved Animals Animals Feet Of Of Waste Volume Of Days Of
CAWMP Scraped Waste Contributing Contribute To Waste For New Dry Storage In
Produced Per Manure To Dry Stack For Storage Stack New Dry
Year Per The New Dry Storage ** Storage Per Stack
Animal* Stack (flours per Day) Per Year Month (Cubic Ft.)
Milk Cows In 544 200 5 22,667 1,889 8,214 132
Confinement
Milk Cows In 544 250 5 28,333 2,361 8,214 106
Confinement
Milk Cows In 544 300 5 34,000 2,833 8,214 88
Confinement
*Design values were obtained from the NRCS Tech Guide 633 from the Dairy Liquid Manure Slurry Land Application Spreadsheet.
**Farmer estimated percent confinement times.
***One month is assumed to contain 30.4 days on average.
Table I assumes the all the animals average being on the concrete pavement 5 hours per day. This is
an estimate you provided EES based on observation. If the animals are on the concrete more or less
time than assumed here, the manure accumulation will be more or less than shown in Table 1. Of
course Table 1 manure production values are assumed from university research and concur with the
NRCS Technical Guide 633. Your manure production values may also vary from those shown in
Table 1.
The new manure dry stack at TWF will be covered by a roof so no stormwater will be allowed to enter.
It is my understanding that you plan to add some additional roof area to cover the dry stack as needed.
Removal of the waste from the dry stack can easily be performed by existing farm equipment.
While the new animal waste utilization plan has not yet been developed, having a place to store your
paved scraped waste should greatly facilitate your land application and crop management options. This
pit does not have any liquid drainage options, but since it is all under roof, liquid drainage should not
be an issue. Make sure no outside stormwater drainage is allowed to enter the dry stack.
Animal waste from the milking operation or heifers and calves will not be stored in the new dry stack.
Plans are to incorporate these other forms of manure collection and storage in a different phase of
design.
I would like to meet with your contractor to discuss construction issues whenever you decide on a
company. You will need to keep the cows out of dry stack pit, but the exact fencing regiment you
use is up to you. Cows that might get into the dry stack could easily be injured. Please make sure you

provide adequate safety fencing for the equipment operators, especially when it comes to accidentally
driving off into the new concrete pit.
You and I discussed how deep to make the pit. Making the pit deeper than the dimensions shown on
the plans is fine, but you should not store manure more than 5 feet deep if you are going to use a front-
end type loader to remove the manure.
The manure dry stack discussed herein will end up being part of your overall Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan or CAWMP. It is not, by itself, sufficient to account for increasing your herd size or
changing your DWQ issued Animal Waste Management Permit.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
�1
Best Re ,a�,
L Grah E.
E ' 1RONME AL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Enclosures
cc:Melissa Rosebrock
Phil Ross.
Keith Larick
J.R.Joshifi
SEAL
• 11602
.*S r all
%:` 20�/

� ,P+qu►fey Protp�t�.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
State General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
I.1 Facility name:TripleW Farms
1.2 Print Land Owner's name:Harold Woody
1.3 Mailing address:3545 East Greensboro-Chanel Hill Hwy
City,State: Snow Camp, Zip:2734
Telephone number(include area code):: ( 3 3 4 ) 3 7 6- t 3 S
Email address: h i-i o o 9 c 7 try` �'C(_5 o v MLI
1.4 Physical address:514 Itl
City,State Zip:
Telephone number(include area code):( )
1.5 County where facility is located:Randolph
1.6 Facility location(directions from nearest major highway,using SR numbers for state roads):
1.7 Farm Manager's name(if different from Land Owner):
1.8 Lessee's/Integrator's name(if applicable;circle which type is listed):
1.9 Facility's original start-up date: Date(s)'of facility expansion(s)(if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility number:Q"J
2.2 Operation Description:
Please enter the Design Capacity of the system. The"No.of Animals"should be the maximum number for which the
waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No.of Animals Typg of Nqlqy No of Animals Type of Cattle No.of Animals
❑Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑Beef Brood Cow
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Beef Feeder
❑Farrow to Wean(#sow) ❑Turkey ❑,Beef Stocker Calf
❑Farrow to Feeder(#sow) ❑Turkey Poults [ ]airy Calf 4
❑Farrow to Finish(#sow) ry Heifer l f1
❑Wean to Finish(#sow) 0-15ry Cow _
❑Gilts ElMilk Cow 2 b
❑Boar/Stud
❑Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No.of Animals:
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-E 1/10/06 Page 1 of 5

uir _
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application(excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): Required Acreage(as listed in the CAWMP:
2.4 Number of lagoons: Total Capacity(cubic feet): Required Capacity(cubic feet):
Number of Storage Ponds: Total Capacity(cubic feet): Required Capacity(cubic feet):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100'of any of the application fields? YES or NO (circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the waste management system? YES or NO (circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? YES or NO (circle one)
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST:
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
ARdicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for State General Permit-
Animal Waste Operations;
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied and a county road map with the location of
the facility indicated;
3.3 Three copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP,it must be completed prior to submittal of a permit application for
animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not have been required at the time
the facility was certified but should be added to the CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan(WUP)must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen(PAN)produced and
utilized by the facility
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields(e.g.irrigation,injection,etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE)for every crop shown in the WUP
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications
3.3.10 A site schematic
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted
3.3.15 Ugoonlstorage pond capacity documentation(design,calculations,etc.);please be sure to include any site
evaluations,wetland determinations,or hazard classifications that may be applicable to your facility
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list,please include the additional components with your
submittal.(Composting,waste transfers,etc.)
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-E 1/10/06 Page 2-of 5

6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION:
This form must be completed by the`appi )priate DWQ regional office and included as a part of the
project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters(the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward)
in which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWQ regional office.
Therefore,you are required,prior to submittal of the application package,to submit this form,with items l through 6
completed,to the appropriate Division of Water Quality Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor(see page 6 of 10). At a
minimum,you must include an 8.5"by l 1"copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application systec-. and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters on the attached'map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the
application package.
6.1 Farm Name:
6.2 Name&complete address of engineering firm:
Telephone number.{ )
6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters:
6.4 County0es)where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located
6.5 Map name and date:
6.6 NC Professional's Seal(If appropriate),Signature,and Date:
TO: REGIONAL AQUWER PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located,as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters:
Classification(as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed classification,if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel: Date:
(All attachments must be signed)
i~
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-E 1/10/06 Page 4 of 5

4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, rG�l r'� 1 r�0 fa -� r and Owner's name listed in question 11),attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting'information and attachments are not included,this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature K Date
S. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
tj_ _ _ _ _(Manager's name listed in question 1.6),attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.0
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included,this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature 014t— -Y Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE,INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS UNIT
1636 MAII. SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
RECEIVED!DENR f DM
Aquifer Protection Section
MAY 12 2010
FORM: AWO-STATE-G-E 1/10/06 Page 3 of 5

Animal Waste Manageindalan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a si nature
�,`• -,. a ., c' �..
,A6 N ,=�aor,;, Ex . ded lease circle one
mation: Permit No: 4 p J f
TIZ f 101. E CJ 1 A A? f1'1 S C ' -Facility No: --
e: 1� t� 17 C 0 t y Phone T'�: "L�
ss:
County Farm is located in:�lq 17119 M C L
angitude: / Integrator:
copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
ins, milepost, etc.):
wrintion:
.. No. ofAnimals Type of Poultry No. ofAnimals Type of Dairy No. ofAnimals
❑Layer cr-Milking .200
1 ❑Non-Layer ❑Dry "3 0 ! q m
y Type of Beef No. ofAnimals O Heifers 1 S O G•m
er ❑Brood ❑Calves 4
h ©Feeders a p
O Stockers �► rn
Other Type of Livestock: Number ofAnimals: �) Z
7 g cr
�'•'AmiCD
Y z 4 H a 3I A
f � aa
�• i O
a rlctt OP V
^°�9dditronal'D&i hi.Ca aci '9r=. Total Desi n Ca a�c+� � �
s for Application: Required Acreage:
structures: Total Capacity: Cubic Feet(ft3)
ains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
irface drains present in the area of the waste structures(piease circle one or both as applicable)
alter Agreement
all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
;edures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
)rocedures. I(we)know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage
ction of new facilities will require a permit application and a new certification to be submitted to the Division
(DWQ) and permit approval received before the new animals are stocked. I(we) understand that there must
of animal waste from the storage system to surface waters of the state unless specifically allowed under a
Q and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of
)unging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by the USDA-Natural
rvation Service (NRCS). The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the DWQ Regional Office and
ocal Soil and Water Conservation District(SWCD). I (we) know that any modification must be approved by
.list and submitted to the DWQ Regional Office and local SWCD and required approvals received from DWQ
ntation. A change in farm ownership requires a permit application to be sent to DWQ along with a new
e approved plan is changed).
t Owner: JL L C e C� t- S r✓ b C �� ci ! 12� GC 14 �(,E T Ll S
lac / Date:
ager (if dif ent from owner . /t t? V 0
1 4Ct
'I-✓e" tko e-0 Y ' Date:
er 18, 2006 1

0
Tech0cal Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 61-1 .0104, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Water Quality as specified in 15A
NCAC 2T .1300 (formerly 2H .0217) and the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil
and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2T.1300 (formerly 2H .0217)and 15A NCAC 61' .0101-.0105.
The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
RECEIVED/DENR/DVVQ
H. Certification of Design Aquifer Protection S".ion
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System MAY 12 2010
Check the appropriate box
❑ Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization requirements.
❑ New, expanded or retrofitted facili , (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):_ Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations(buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization;chosen crop is suitable
for waste management; and the hydraulic and nutrient loading rates are appropriate for the site and receiving crop.
Name of Te/c�hnical Specialist (Please Print): CPl r l I"!S 0 S le y _
Affiliation�`Oa te- Tzr-ttnola1IKL . Date Work Completed: Z3 /o
Address (Ag ): 5 o E urke Ja ZJ� C Z tint; Phone No.: q I C1-OSCI_066 9
Signature: Date: VS D
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
❑ Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
❑ Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC-September 18, 2006 2

D). _Application and Handling Apment
Check the appropriate box
❑ Existing or expanding facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the waste
management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed
either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established;
required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the plan).
❑ New,expanded,or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for spray irrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications
has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
❑ New, expanded,or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for land spreading not using spray
irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the plan
at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications
has been established; required buffers can be maintained;calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part
of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control, Mortality Management and Emergency Action Plan (SD,
SI, WUP, RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control
Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects have
been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best Management
Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the Mortality
Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996, if the facility was built before June 21, 1996,when was it constructed or last expanded
I (we)certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners who
own property located across a public road,street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in
compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified are
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC-September 18, 2006 3

0 •
Ill. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified in
the plan.
Far facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or 1)
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner has
proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC-September 1 S,200b 4

E) Odor Control, Insect Contrad Mortality Manalzement__(SD, SI, 10_ P_, RC or 1)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print)!
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the DWQ Regional Office and the local Soil and Water Conservation
District Office and to keep a copy in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC-September 18,2006 5

RECEIVE4 dO clot sa i R aselo'
N.G.Deot of ENR
Nom
MAY 17'2010 Ws /2o
winstonSalem
Regional Office
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
04-21-2010
This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been developed bT��r,`�����r�,,,
CAP,
Triple W Farming Hal Langenbach
Harold Woody Agri-Waste Technology, Inc.
3545 E Greensboro-Chapel 5400 Etta Burke Court
- L
Hill Road Suite 200 `
Q:
Snow Camp,NC 27349 Raleigh, NC 27606
336-213-8644 919-859-0669 ""If" A.
4-ZZ- to
C- OSIq
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I(we)understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above.I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
A0 ¢d
Signature(owner) Date
Signature(manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of
Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
/'1/ 3
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
815604 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-21-2010 Cover Pap 1
1

Narrative
The Triple W Farming facility is a dairy farm located in Alamance County,NC. The facility includes
livestock that is maintained on pasture and confined. The maximum population at this facility includes
the following animals:
45 Calves-Confined in hutches 100%of time. Bedded on shavings and straw.
25 Weaned heifers/steer- Confined 100%of the time. Bedded on shavings.
40 Growing heifers/steer-Remain on pasture 100%of the time.
85 Breeding heifers- Remain on pasute 100%of the time.
200 Milk Cows-Only confined December to February. 15%of the confinement period,the cows are
released to a holding lot. Half of the animals are housed in a freestall barn and half are housed in a pack
barn. Manure and wastewater from the freestall barn is stored in the storage tank. Pack barns are
cleaned and directly land applied.
30 Dry Cows-Remain on pasture 100%of the time.
The parlor water from the milk house is collected in an open concrete pit(approximate dimensions of 4'x
30'x T). This pit is emptied into the honey wagon and land applied as needed. The storage tank that
holds the freestall barn waste can also be used to hold the parlor water. The parlor water is not included
as a nutrient source for this plan since no samples of the liquid have been collected and analyzed.
There are several buildings at the facility that are used to store various feeds for the livestock. A bunk
silo is also located on the facility's property.
The facility includes several pastures where a portion of the population is maintained. There are also
several application fields(both owned and leased)where the collected manure can be land applied. None
of the application fields are grazed at this facility. The application fields currently produce Johnson
Grass and Pearl Millet(for hay), Sudan Hay and row crops(Soybeans/Winter cover/Corn for grain).
The manure collection tank for the freestall barn is currently used only during the months of December to
February(the confinement period). Waste from the manure collection tank is land applied using a honey
wagon. The pack barns and manure from the calf hutches is scraped and land applied using a solids
spreader.
Mortality at this farm is handled through a licensed renderer and daily pickup is available as needed.
The following assumptions and qualifications are made regarding this plan:
1) Since Johnson Grass currently does not have an established realistic yield expectation, Sudan grass
was used as a relacement crop since it should have similar nutrient needs.
2) A few fields were shown to have a soil type of Tirrah sandy loam. This soil type was not included in
the standard databases included in the NC Nutrient Management Software. Related soil types in the area
of the field were used as a replacement.
3) The storage tank was shown to have 77 days of storage. This may not necessarily represent an
accurate depiction of the actual storage period. The NC Nutrient Management Software does not allow
for an accurate depiction of partial year confinement. Since this farm only confines animals for parts of
the year,the tank is only used for part of the year. The software attempts to simulate continuous
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prcvicw Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-22-2010 Narrative Page 1 of 2

• •
Narrative
collection of manure from the population on a year round basis. To account for this,the following
adjustments were made:
(a) For the nutrient production values(N, P, K),a weighted average population was used in the Nutrient
Management program. (i.e. 100 cows x(25%of the year confinement)x(85%confinement during that
period)=21 cows.)
(b) For the volumetric calculation, it is assumed that 100 cows will produce 14 gal/hd-day of slurry into
the tank(NRCS 633 Standard). The tank volume is estimated to be approximately 108,000 gallons.
Therefore,the nominal storage period is approximately 77 days. Since winter cover is used on fields 1,
2, 3, 8 and 9,the waste can be applied through this period extending the storage period to at least 180
days. (Note: 60.8 acres of small grain overseed can accept 5,051 gallons/ac of slurry. This will allow
for the application of an additional 307,100 gallons of slurry from the tank during the storage period of
December to February.) It should be noted that the Nutrient Management Software accounts for manure
being added to the tank on a year-round basis. This is not occuring at this farm due to the confinement
schedule being limited to 3 months. This calculation method is overly conservative in terms of
estimating the volumetric balance for this system
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ................... ---------------------------------------------
Prcview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-22-2010 Narrative Page 2 of 2

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
Ul Dairy Milk Cow Slurry(No parlor water)waste generated 124,404 gals/year by 21
animal Dairy(Milk Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry operation.This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 77 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 1231
Incorporated 1679
Injected 1903
Irrigated 1120
Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/
PAN(lbs) * Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Gallons) Deficit(Gallons)
Year 1 1,231 17093 -15,862 1,726,671 -1,602,267
Year 2 1,231 14337 -13,106 1,448,284 -1,323,880
Sl Dairy(Milk Cow) Solid waste generated 374.00 tons/year by(5,04imal Dairy(Milk
Cow)Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 1608
Incorporated 2132
Injected N/A
Irrigated N/A
Max Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Quantity Surplus/Deficit
PAN(lbs) * Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Tons) (Tons)
Year 1 1 1,608 13267 -11,659 3,085.31 -2,711.31
Year 2 1,608 14259 -12,651 3,315.90 -2,941.90
---------------------- ----- - -- ---- - ----- ---- --- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID,S means standard source,U means user defined source.
• Max.Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s)identified in the plan for this source.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-22-2010 Source Page'l of 2

• •
S44 Dairy(Calf) Solid waste generated 184.50 tonslyear by 45 imal Dairy(Calf) Solid
operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 793
Incorporated 1052
Injected NIA
Irrigated NIA
Max.Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Quantity Surplus/Deficit
PAN(lbs) * Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Tons) (Tons)
Year 1 793 3258 -2,465 757.61 -573.11
Year 2 793 3258 -2,465 757.61 -573.11
S45 Dairy(Heifer) Solid waste generated 300.00 tons/year by e�plm
al Dairy(Heifer)
Solid o ration.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 1290
Incorporated 1710
Injected NIA
Irrigated N/A
Max.Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Quantity Surplus(Deficit
PAN(lbs) * Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Tons) (Tons)
Year 1 1,290 3258 -1,968 757.61 457.61
Year 2 1,290 3258 -1,968 757.61 457.61
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG43942
entitled"Soil Facts: Use of On-Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan"for
guidance on using on-farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
------------ ---------------------------------------- --- -----------••--•e-------------------------------------------------------
Max. In source ID,S means standard source,U means user defined source.
• Max.Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s)identified in the plan for this source.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-22-2010 Source Page 2 of 2

The table shown below provides a summaryof the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop,as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index(LI)
and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT)Rating are also provided for each field,where available.
If field's PLAT Rating is High,any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers maybe
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of
P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P2O5
Tract Field Acres A� Rat' Removal Applied
Rating
Li Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbslacre) Qba/aae)
Leased 11 7.20 7.20 Unknown NIA Ap ling Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 45 bu. 36 N/A
Small Grain Cover NIA 0 N/A
Corn,Grain 132 bu. 58 NIA
Leased 12 10.90 10.90 Unknown NIA Georgeville Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu. 32 NIA
Small Grin Cover N/A 0 NIA
Corn,Grain 119 bu. 52. N/A
Leased 13 MIC MAC Unknown N/A Appling Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 71 N/A
Leased 14 10.7 10.70 Unknown N/A Georgeville small Grain pvcrswd 1.0 Tom 15 N/A
Pearl Millett,Hay 4.2 Tons 56 NIA
Small Grain Oversced 1.0 Tons 15 NIA
Pearl Millett,Hay 4.2 To 56 N/A
Leased 15 15.90 15.90 Unknown N/A Gwrgevdle Soybewn,Manured,Double Crop 41 bu. 33 NIA
Small Grain Coves N/A 0 N/A
Corn,Grain 122 bu. 54 N/A
Leased 4 10.2 10.2 Unknown N/A Herndon Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.6 Tons 64 NIA
Leased 5 8.3 8.3 Unknown N/A Georgeville So um-Sudan Hay 4.7 Tons 65 N/A
Owned 1 5.5 5.50, Unknown N/A , Appling Small Grain Overseed LOTonsl 15 NIA
Pearl Millett,Hay 4.6 Tons 61 N/A
Small Grain Overseed LOTons 15 N/A
Pearl Millett,Hay 4.6 Tons61 N/A
Owned 10 21A 21.901 Unknown N/A Appling Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 71 NIA
Owned 2 1 9.5 9.50 Unknown N/A Herndon Small Grin Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 N/A
Pearl Millett,Hay 4.2 Tons 56 NIA
Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 N/A
Pearl Millett,Hay 4.2 Tonsl56 NIA
Owned 3 16.30 16.30 Unknown NIA Herndon jSmall Grain Overseed 1.0 To 15 NIA
Pearl Millm Hay 4.2 To 56 NIA
Small Grain Overseed 1.0 To is N/A
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4fMO10
PCs Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol'means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat
P2O5
RemTract Field Acres A� Ratingobsht l Applied
LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE p6slacre) (lln/aore)
Pearl Millen,Hay 4.2 To 56 N/A
Owned 9 14,10 14.10 Unknown N/A I Georgeville Small Grin Overseed 1.0 Tons 15 NIA
Pearl Millen,Hay 4.2 Tons 56 NIA
Small Grain Overseed 1.0 To 15 NIA
Pearl Millen,Hay 4.2 Tom 56 NIA
Owned 9 15.40 15.40 Unknown NIA I Georgeville Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons is N/A
Pearl Millett,Hay 4.2 Tons 56 N/A
Small Grin Overseed 1.0 To 15 N/A
Pead Millen,Hay 4.2 To 56 N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 160.00 160.00
LI Potential Leaching Technical,
2 w potential to contribute to soluble None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>_2& Moderate potential to contribute to Nutrient Management(590)should be planned.
<-10 soluble nutrient leaching below the
root sane.
High potential to oontribute to soluble Nutrient Management(590)should be planned Other oonsavation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone. the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10 considered. ExmVic4 are Covcr Crops(340)to scavenge nutrients,Sod-Based Rotations
(328),Long-Tenn No-Till(778),and edge-of--field practices such as Filter Strips(393)and
Riparian Forest Buffers(391).
PLAT:Indes; Rahn P Mmra ement•R mm 7 {`�
g g eca endatro>a x r
i J. .:•x ,� a.rd e d.r 'a.n� r,"'-A144q!� • ii
0-25 LOW No adjustment needed;N based application
25-50 Medium No adjustment needed;N based application
51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal
> 100 Very High Starter P application only
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4C22/2010
PCs Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol'°means user entered data

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products,commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate ofthe'quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen Canm Res. Mangy Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. Ilbs/A) PA Manurr.A Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pphed Applied Applied Appbod
Regid Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
Obs/A) (lbs/A) pbs1A)
Source Toial Use. Appbc. Applic. 1000
Tract I Field ID I Soil Series Acres I Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Mdbod N wA Tons 1000 gals tons
Leased 11 S1 6pling 7.20 7.20 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 45 bu. 411-9/15 175 0 0 Broad. 87 0.00 20.73 0.00 145.E
Leased I 1 U1 Appling 7.20 7.20 Soybeans,Manumd,Double Crop 45 bu. 4/1-91I5 175 0 0 Broad.1 88 8.89 0.00 64.01 0.00
Leased I I NIA Appling 7.20 7.20 Small Grain Cover NIA 9/1-3/31 25 5 20 NIA 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00
Leased 12 S1 Georgeville 10.90 10.90 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu. 411-9/15 155 0 0 Broad. 77 0.00 I7.91 0.00 195.1
Leased 12 U1 Georgeville 10.90 10.90 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu. 4/1-9/15 155 0 0 Broad. 78 7.88 0.00 85.89 0.00
Leased 12 N/A Georgeville 10.90 10.90 Small Grain Cover N/A 9/1-3/31 25 5 20 NIA 0 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.04
Leased 13 S44 Appling 14.10 14.10 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15-g/31 252 1 0 Broad. 62 0. 14.42 0.00 203.3
6!!jd4 13 S45 piing 14.10 14.10 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15-8/31 252 1 0 Broad. 6 0. 14.4 0. 203.3
Leased 13 SI piing 14.10 14.10 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/154LI1 252 1 0 Broad. 6 0. 14.4 0. 203.3
Leased 13 UI Appling 14.10 14.10 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15-8/31 252 1 0 Broad. 65 6.57 0. 92.59 0.00
Leased 14 U 1 Creorgevitle, 10.70 10.70 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 20 2.02 0. 21.62 0.00
Leased 14 Si Georgeville 10.70 10.70 Pearl Millett,Hay 4.2 Tons 411-9115 203 0 0 Broad 101 0,00 23AS 0.00 2513
Leased 14 Ul Georgevillc 10.70 10.70 Pearl Millett,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 102 10.30 0.00 110.25 0.00
Leased 14 Ul Georgeville 10.70 10.70 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 30 3.03 0.00 32.43 0.00
Leased 15 S1 eville 15.90 15.90 Soybeans,Manumd,Double Crop 41 bu. 4/1-9115 159 0 0 Broad. 79 0.00 18.37 0.00 292.11
Leased I5 Ul rgeville 15.90 15.90 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 41 bu. 4/1-9/15 159 1 0 1 0 J Broad.1 g 8.0 0. 128.50 0.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/22/2010 WUT Page 1 of 6

Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen Canm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fort. (ibs/A) PA ManumA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pphed Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) pbs/A) 6WA)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 10OD
Tract Field ID I Soil Series Acres I Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A I Tons 1000 gals tons
Leased Is NIA Georgeville 15.90 15.90 Small Grain Cover NIA 9/1-3/31 25 5 20 NIA 0 0.00 O.DO 0.00 0.00
Leased 4 S44 Hemdon 10.20 10.20 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 222 0 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12,79 0.00 130.4
Leased 4 S45 Herndon 10.20 10.20 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4,6 Tons 3115-8/31 222 0 0 Broad. 55 O.Cq 12.79 0.00 130.46
d 4 SI Herndon 10.20 10.20 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.6 Tons 3115-8/31 222 0 0 Broad. 55 0. 12.79 0.00 130.4
Leased 4 Ul Herndon 10.20 10.20 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 222 0 0 Broad. 57 5.76 O.DO 58.73 0.00
Leased 5 S44 Georgeville 8.30 8.30 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.7 Tons 3/15-8/31 227 1 0 Broad. 56 0.00 13.02 0.00 108.09
Leased 5 S45 Georgeville 8.30 8.30 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.7 Tons 3/154LG 1 227 1 0 Broad. 56 0.00 13.02 0.00 108.09
1-cased 5 S1 Georgeville 8.30 8.30 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.7 Tons 3/15431 227 1 0 Broad. 56 0.00 13.02 0.00 108.09
Leased 5 U1 Georgeville 8.30 8.30 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.7 Tons 3/15-8/31 227 I 0 Broad. 58 5.86 0.00 48.63 0.00
Owned I U 1 Appling 5.50 5.50 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 20 2.02 0.00 11.11 0.00
Owned I S1 Appling 5,50 5.50 Pearl Millett,Hay 4.6 Tons 411-9/15 227 0 0 Broad. 113 0.00 26,21 0.00 144.53
Owned 1 U1 Appling 5.50 5.50 Pearl Millett,Hay 4.6 Tons 4/1-9/15 227 0 0 Broad. 114 11.5 0. 63.34 0.00
Owned 1 UI piing 5.50 5.50 Small Grain Oversud 1.0 Tans 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 3 3.03 0. 16.6 0,00
ed 10 S44 piing 21.90 21.90 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15-8/31 252 t 0 Broad. b 0. 14.4 0. 315.7
Owned 10 S45 Appling. 21.90 21.90 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3115-9131 252 l 1 0 Broad. 62 0.00 14.42 0.00 315.7
Owned 10 Sl Appling 21.90 21.90 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15431 252 1 0 Broad. 62 0,00 14.42 0.00 315.7
Owned 10 Ul Appling 21.90 21.90 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15451 252 1 0 Broad. 65 6.57 0.00 143.80 0.00
Owned 2 U l Herndon 9.50 9.50 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 20 2.02 0. 19.19 0.00
Owned 2 Sl Hemclon 9.50 9.50 Pcari Millets,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 101 0. '23.45 0.00 223.1
Owned 2 Ul Hemdon 9.50 9.50 Peat MillM Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 102 103 0. 97.99 0.00
Owned 2 Ul Herndon 9.50 9.50 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 1 Broad. 30 3.03 O. 28.79 0.
Owned 3 Ul Herndon 16.30 ad.16.30 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Bro 2 2.0 0. 32.93 0.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/22/2010 WUT Page 2 of 6

Waste Utilization Table Year I
Nitrogen Cantu Res. Manum Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. 0wA) PA ManumA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Appled Applied Applied
Rcq'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
pbs/A) ¢bs/A) Obs1A)
Sauce Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N ga1/A Tons 1000 gals tons
Owned 3 SI Herndon 16.30 16.30 Pearl Millett,Hay 4.2 Tons 1 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 101 0.00 23.49 0.00 382.85
Owned 3 UI Herndon 16.30 16.30 Pearl Millett,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/t-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 102 10.30 0.00 167.95 0.00
Owned 3 UI Hemdon 16.30 16.30 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10//1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 30 3.03 0.00 49.40 0,00
ed 8 UI Georgeville 14.10 14.10 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 20 102 OXq 28.49 0.
Owned 8 S1 Georgeville 14.10 14.10 Pearl Hulett,Hay 4.2 Tons 411-9115 203 0 0 Broad. 101 0.00 23.49 0.00 331.1
Owned 8 U1 Georgeville 14.10 14.10 Pearl Millett,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 10 10.3 0.0 145.29 0.
Owned 1 8 U1 Georgeville 14.10 14.10 Sma1I Crain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 30 3.03 0. 42.73 0.00
Owned 1 9 U1 Georgevillc 15.40 15.40 Small Grain Overseed LO Tons 1011-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 20 2.02 0. 31.11 0.00
Owned 9 SI Georgeville 15.40 15.40 Pearl Millett,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 101 0.00 23AS 0.00 361.7
Owned 9 UI Georgeville 15.40 15.40 Pearl Millen,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 10 '10.3'0 0.0c 158.68 0.
Owned 9 1Ul lGeorgeville 15.40 15.40 Small Grain Oversecd LO Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 3 3.03 0.00 46.67 0.
Total Applied,1000 gallons 1,726.E
Total Produced, 1000 gallons 124.
Balance, 1000 gallons -1,602.2
Total Applied,tons 4,600.53
Total Produced,tons 858.5
Balance,tons -3,742.03
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/22/2010 WUT Page 3 of 6

Waste Utilization Table Year 2
Nitrogeni Comm Res. Manure 1 Liquid Solid Liquid solid
PA Fert. Obs/A) PA Manurr.A Manure Manure Manum
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Apphad Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
Obs/A) abs/A) abs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field 11) Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
Leased 11 SI kpling 7.20 7.20 Com,Grain 132 bu. 2115-6/30 147 0 25 Broad. 122 0.00 28.37 0.00 204.2
Leased 12 S1 Georgeville 10.90 10.90 Com,Grain 119 bu. 2/15-6/30 129 0 25 Broad.1 104 0.00 24.19 0.00 263.6
Leased 13 S44 Appling. 14.10 14.10 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15-8/31 252 1 0 Broad. 62 0.00 14.42 0.00 2033
ed 13 S45 Appling 14.10 14.10 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15-8131 252 1 0 Broad, 62 0.00 14,42 0.00 203.3
Leased 13 S1 Appling 14.10 14.10 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15-8/31 252 1 0 Broad. 62 0.00 14.4 A 0.00 203.3
Leased 13 U1 Appling 14.10 14.10 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15-8131 252 1 0 1 Broad. 65 6.57 0.0 92.58 0.0
Leased 14 Ul Georgeville 10.70 10.70 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 30 3.03 0.0C 32.43 0.00
Leased 14 U1 Georgeville 10.70 10.70 Small Grain Overseed LO Tons 10/1-3/31 56 0 0 Broad. 20 2.02 O,OC 21.62 0.00
Leased 14 S1 Georgeville 10.70 10.70 Pearl Millets,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 101 0.00 23.4S. 0.00 251.3
Leased 14 Ul Georgeville 10.70 10.70 Pearl Millets,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad, 102 10.30 0.00 110.25 0.
Leased 15 S1 Georgeville 15.90 15.90 Com,Grain 122 bu. 2/15-WO 1 132 0 25 Broad. 107 0.00 24.8 0-00 395.65
Leased 4 S44 Herndon 10.20 10.20 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.6 Tons 3/15-8/31 222 0 0 Broad. 55 0. 12.79 0.00 130.4
Leased 4 S45 Hemdon 10.20 10.20 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.6 Tons 3/15-&31 222 0 1 0 Broad. 55 0.00 12.7i 0.00 130.4
ed 4 SI Hemdon 10.20 10.20 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.6 Tons 3/15-M1 222 0 0 Broad. 55 0,00 12.7 0,00 130.46
Leased 4 UI Herndon 10.20 10.20 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.6 Tons 3/15401 1 222 0 0 Broad. 57 5.76 0A 58.73 0.00
Leased 5 S44 Georgeville 8.30 8.30 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.7 Tons 3/15-851 227 1 0 Broad. 5 0A 13.0 0.00 108.09
Leased 5 S45 Georgeville 9.30 8.30 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.7 Tons 3/15-Ml 227 1 0 Broad. 5 0.0C 13.02 0.00 108.09
Leased 5 S I Georgevifle 9.30 8.30 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.7 Tons 3/15-M 1 227 1 0 Broad. 5f 0.0C 13.02 0.00 108.09
Leased 5 01 Georgeville 8.30 8.30 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 4.7 Tons 3/15401 227 1 0 Broad. 51 5.8 0A 48.63 0.00
Owned 1 UI piing 5,50 5.50 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 3 3.03 0. 16.6 0.00
Owned 1 U I kppling 5.50 5.50 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 2C 2.02 0. 11.11 0.00
Owned l SI pling 1 5.50 5.50 Pearl Millets,Hay 4.6 Tons 1 4/1-9/15 227 0 0 Broad. 113 0.00 26.2 0.00 144.53
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/22/2010 WUT Page 4 of 6

Waste Utilization Table Year 2
Nitrogen Camm Res, Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManturA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Read Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Feld) (Field)
(Ibs/A) Obs1A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. App6a ApplieQ 1000
Tract Field ID I Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
Owned l U1 Appling 5.50 5.50 Pearl Millets,Hay 4.6 Tons 4/1-9/15 227 0 0 Broad. 114 11.52 0.00 63.34 0.00
Owned 10 S44 Appling 21.90 21.90 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5,1 Tons 3/15-8/31 252 1 0 Broad. 62 0.00 14.42 0.00 315.7
Owned 10 S45 Appling 21.90 21.90 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15-8/31 252 1 0 Broad. 62 0.00 14.4 0.00 315,7
ed 10 S1 Appling 2I.90 21.90 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15-8/31 252 1 0 Broad. 62 0.00 14.42 0.00 315.7
Owned t0 U1 Appling 21.90 21.90 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 5.1 Tons 3/15-8/31 252 1 0 Broad. 65 6.57 0.00 143.80 0.0
Owned 2 U1 Herndon 9.50 9.50 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 30 3,03 0.00 28.79 0.00
Owned 2 U1 Herndon 9.50 9.50 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 20 2.02 0. 19.19 0.0
Owned 2 Sl Herndon 9.50 9.50 Pearl Millctt,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 101 0.00 23.4 0.00 223.1
Owned 2 Ul Herndon 9.50 9.50 Pearl Millen,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 102 10.3 0. 97.89 0.00
Owned 3 U 1 Herndon 16.30 16.30 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 30 3.03 0. 49,40 0.00
Owned 3 UI Herndon 16.30 16.30 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/I-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 20 2.02 0. 32.93 0.0
Owned 3 Sl Herndon 16.301 16.30 Pearl Millets,Hay 4.2 Tons 411-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 101 0.00 23.45 0.00 392.85
Owned 3 Ul Herndon 16.30 16.30 Pearl Millets,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/I-9/15 203 0 0 Broad.1 102 10.3 0.0c 167.95 0.00
ed 8 Ul lGeorgovi.1le 14.10 14.10 Small Grain Oversecd 1.0 Tons 1011-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 30 3.03 0. 42.73 0.00
Owned 8 Ul Georgeville 14.10 14.10 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 20 2.02 0. 28.49 0.00
Owned 8 S 1 Georgeville 14.10 14,10 Pearl MillM Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 101 0.00 2145 0.00 331.1
Owned 8 Ui Geormille, 14.10 14.10 Pearl Millen,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad_ 102 10.3 0. 145.29 0.00
Owned 9 UI Georgeville 15.40 15.40 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 30 3.03 0. 46,6 0.00
Owned 9 Ul Georgevifie 15.40 15.40 Small Grain Overseed 1.0 Tons 10/1-3/31 50 0 0 Broad. 20 2.02 0. 31.11 0.00
Owned 9 Sl Georgeville 15.40 15.40 Pearl Millets,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 101 0. 23.45 0.00 361-724
Owned . 9 1 Ul kmrgcville 15.40 15.40 Pearl Millen,Hay 4.2 Tons 4/1-9/15 203 0 0 Broad. 102 10.3 0. 158.68 0.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:412=010 WUT Page 5 of 6

Waste Utilization Table Year 2
Nitragen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManurcA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient ppfied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (ace) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) 4WA) abs/A)
Source Total Use. Appfic, AppGc, 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N g WOO Tons 1000 gals tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons 1,448.2
Total Produced, 1000 gallons 124.4
Balance, 1000 gallons -1,323.8
Total Applied,tons 4,831.1
Total Produced,tons 858.5
Balance,tons -3,972.E
Notes: 1. In the tract column,--symbol metros leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol •means user entered data.
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/22/2010 WUT Page 6 of 6

i 0
The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient
management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops
for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient
requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity
of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other
byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of
this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources
may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 0 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Obs/A) (tnns(A)
Tract Field Leased 14 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 1a 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 10.70 10/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain OverseW Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WSoils eville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0te LO Tons 03-26-10 Manure 50 49 75 24 1 1 0 0
ng 15 lbs/ac. nknown BALANCE 0 49 65 24 1 1 0 0
Owned I Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 5.50 1011-3131 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series ApPling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Dale 1.0 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 50 49 75 24 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 15 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 49 75 24 1 1 0 0
Tract Field Owned 2 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres A Period 9.50 10/I-3/31 Supplied B k
PP• PP Y :
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Hemdan Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 50 49 75 24 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 15 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 49 75 24 1 1 0 0
Tract Field Owned 3 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 16.30 10/1-3131 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Ovcrsced Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 ol 0 01 0 0
Soil Series Hern Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tau 1 03-26-10 Manure 50 49 75 24 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 15 lbs/ac. PnkDown BALANCE 1 0 491 75 24 1 1 1 0 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4f1.?1Z010 NMR Page 1 of 9

0
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 0 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Li me
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (1bs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field Owned S Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.10 t0/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 50 49 75 241 1 1 0 0
P Removal IRating 15 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 49 75 241 1 1 0 0
Tract Field Owned 9 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 15.40 10/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Gram Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series GeorSville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 1 03-26-10 Manurel 50 491 75 24 t t 0 0
P Removal Rating 15 Ibs/ac. nknown BALANCE 1 0 49 75 24 l 11 0 0
NOTE: Symbol means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/22/2010 NMR Page 2 of 9

• 0
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (WA) (tons/A)
Tract I Field leased 11 Req'd Nutrients 25 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 7.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Cover Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 5 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Appling Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 0.0 Tons 03-26,10 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 0 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field ' Leased 11 Req'd Nutrients 175 0 20 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 7.20 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: r
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Sail Series APPling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 45 bu. 03-26-10 Manure 175 175 254 871 4 31 0 0
FTra
moval Rating 36 lbs/ac. nknown BALANCE 0 175 234 67 4 3 0 0ct Field Leased 12 Req'd Nutrients 25 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 10.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Cover Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fat. 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series i creorixville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 0.0 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
P Removal I Rating 0 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field leased 12 Req'd Nutrients 155 10 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 10.90 411-9/15 Supplied By: WA
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0i 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 40 bu. 03-26-10 Manure 155 155 225 76 3 3 0 0
P Removal I Rating 32 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 145 225 76 3 3 0 0
Tract Field Leased 13 Req'd Nutrients 252 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.10 3/15-01 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fen. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 5.1 Tons 1 03-26-10 Manure 251 253 361 1271 4 4 0 0
P Removal I Rating 71 lbs/ac. Pnknown BALANCE 0 253 3611 1271 4 4 01 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4fl?11010 NMR Page 3 of 9

0
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR I N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) gbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract I Field Leased 14 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 10.70 10/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter, 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 1.0 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 50 49 75 24 l 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 15 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 49 65 24 1 1 0 0
Tract Field Leased 14 Req'd Nutrients 203 0 40 0 0 0 0 4
zmm
Acres App.Period 10.70 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Pearl Millett,Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.2 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 203 203 295 101 4 4 0 0
P Removal I Rating 56 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 01 203 255 101 4 4 0 0
Tract Field Leased 15 Req'd Nutrients 25 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 15.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Cover Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 5 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Gcormille Residual 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RY$ Sample Date 0.0 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal I Rating 0 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field Leased 15 Req'd Nutrients 159 30 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 15.90 4/1-9/15 Supplied By: ,
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 41 bu. 03-26-10 Manure 159 159 231 78 3 3 0 0
P Removal I Rating 33 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 129 231 78 3 3 0 0
Tract I Field Leased 4 Req'd Nutrients 222 0 120 0 0 0 0 0
Ac+w App.Period 10.20 3/15431 Supplied By: Om
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 ol 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Hemdon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.6 Tons 1 03-2640 Manure 222 224 319 111 4 41 0 0
P Removal I Rating 64 Ibs/ac. rnknown 1 BALANCE I Or 224 199 1111 4 41 01 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 41=010 NMR Page 4 of 9

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
YEAR I (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) pbs/A} (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field Leased 5 Req'd Nutrients 227 0 110 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 8.30 3115-8/31 Supplied By: MW am
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 1 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.7 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 2261 228 324 115 4 4 0 0
P Removal Rating 65 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 228 214 1151 4 4 0 0
Tract Field Owned 1 Req'd Nutrients 227 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0
Acres jApp.Period 5.50 4/1-9115 Supplied By:
CROP Pearl Millets,Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Feat. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sail Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.6 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 227 226 330 113 4 41 t 0
P Removal I Rating 61 lbs/ac, Unknown BALANCE 0 226 330 113 4 4 1 0
Tract I Field Owned l Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 5.50 10/1-3/31 Supplied By: ;
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fat. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series APpling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 50 49 75 24 1 l 0 0
P Removal Rating 15 Ibs/ae, Unknown BALANCE 0 49 75 24 1 l 0 4
Tract Field Owned 10 Req'd Nutrients 252 0 70 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 21.90 3/15-8131 Supplied By:
CROP Sorghum-Sudan Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fat. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series APPling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 5.1 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 251 253 361 127 4 4 0 0
P Removal I Rating 71 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 253 291 127 4 4 0 0
Tract Field Owned 2 Req'd Nutrients 203 0 30 0 0 4 0 0
Acre App,Period 9.50 4/1-9115 Supplied By:
CROP Pearl Millett,Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fat. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Herndon Residual 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.2 Tons 1 03-26-10 Manure 2031 203 2951 l01 41 4 0 0
P Removal I Rating 56 Ibs/ac. nlmown I BALANCE 01 1031 2651 l0l 41 4 0 0
i Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/22/2010 NMR Page 5 of 9

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn 7n Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract I Field Owned 2 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 9.50 10/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 ❑
Soil Series Hemdon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 50 49 75 24 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 15 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 49 75 24 1 1 0 0
R
ract Field Owned 3 Req'd Nutrients 203 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
res App.Period 16.30 4/1-9l15 Supplied By: am
CROP Pearl Millets,Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Herndon Residual 0 01 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.2 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 203 203 295 101 4 4 0 0
P Removal I Rating 56 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 203 295 101 4 4 0 0
Tract Field Owned 3 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 16.30 10/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fat. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Hemdon Residual 0 0 0 of 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 50 49 75 24 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 15 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 49 75 24 1 1 0 0
Traci Field Owned 8 Req'd Nutrients 203 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.10 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Pearl Millett,Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgoville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.2 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 203 203 295 101 4 4 01 0
P Removal I Rating 56 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 203 295 101 4 4 0 0
Tract Field Owned 8 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.10 l0/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed. Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fat. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .
Soil Series Gcorgeville Residual 01 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1 A Tons 1 03-26-10 Manure 50 49 75 24 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 15 Ibs/ae. rkno,, BALANCE 1 01 491 711 24 1_ 11 if 0 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4=010 NMR Page 6 of 9

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn CU Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/.A) (IbslA) (tons/A)
Tract I Field Owned 9 Req'd Nutrients 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 15.40 10/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tom 03-26-10 Manure 50 49 75 24 1 i 0 0
P Removal I Rating 15 lbs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 49 75 24 1 l 0 0
Tract I Field Owned 9 Req'd Nutrients 203 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App,Period 15.40 4/1-9115 Supplied By:
CROP Pearl Millett,Hay Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.2 Tone 1 03-26-10 Manure 203 2031 295 101 4 4 01
0
P Removal Rating 56 Ibs/ac, nknown BALANCE 0 203 295 101 4 4 0 0
NOTE: Symbol 'means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/=010 NMR Page 7 of 9

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (1bs1A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lons/A)
Tract I Field Leased 1 11 Req'd Nutrients 147 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 7.20 1 .2115-00 Supplied By:
CROP Com,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Appling Residual 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 132 bu. 03-26-10 Manure 1221 123 173 62 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 58 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 123 153 62 2 2 0 0
Tract Field Leased 12 Req'd Nutrients 129 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 10.90 2115-/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cmrpvillc Residual 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Dam 119 bu. 03-26.10 Manure 104 105 147 53 2 21 0 0
P Removal I Rating 52 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 95 147 53 2 2 0 0
Tract Field Leased 14 Req'd Nutrients 203 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres jApp.Period 10.70 VI-9115 Supplied By: "
CROP Pearl Millen,Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.2 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 203 203 295 101 4 4 ❑ 0
P Removal I Rating 56 lbs/ac, Unknown BALANCE 0 203 255 10I 4 4 0 0
Trail I Field [.eased 15 Req'd Nutrients 132 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 15.90 2/15-/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 122 bu. 03-26-10 Manure 107 108 152 55 2 2 D 0
P Removal I Rating 54 Ibs/ac, Unknown BALANCE 0 78 152 55 2 2 0 0
Tray I Field Owned 1 2 Req'd Nutrients 203 0 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 9.50 4/1-9115 Supplied By: wan
CROP Pearl Millets,Hay Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Hemdon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.2 Tons 1 03-26-10 1 Manure 203 203 295 1011 4 4 0 0
P Removal I Rating 56 Ibs/ac. rnknown I BALANCE 0 2031 2651 1011 41 41 Ol 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4122R010 NMR Pop 8 of 9

0
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field Owned 3 Req'd Nutrients 203 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres jApp.Period 16.30 4/1-9115 Supplied By:
CROP Pearl Millett,Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Hemidon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Dale 4.2 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 203 203 295 101 4 4 0 0
P Removal I Rating 56 Ibs/ac. Unknown BALANCE 0 203 295 101 4 4 0 0
Tract Ficld Owned 9 Req'd Nutrients 203 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.10 4/1-9115 Supplied By:
CROP Pearl Millett,Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goorgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.2 Tons 03-26-10 Manure 203 203 295 1011 4 4 0 0
P Removai Rating 56 lbs/w. Unknown BALANCE 0 203 295 1011 4 4 0 0
Traci I Field Owned 9 Req'd Nutrients 203 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 15.40 4/1-9115 Supplied By:
CROP Pearl Millett,Hay Starter 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sail Series ille Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.2 Tons 1 03-26-10 Manure 203 203 295 101 4 4 0 0
P Removal I Rating 56 lbs/ac. rnknown BALANCE 0 203 295 101 4 4 0 0
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/22/2010 NMR Page 9 of 9

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate
excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper
can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can
be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85.
By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices,this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample.
Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
oil Test Values
Lime Recorn.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Capper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation
Leased I I Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.3 0.9 85 None 121 None
Leased I I Small Grain Cover 5.3 0.0 85 None 121 None
Leased I I Corn,Grain 5.3 0.0 85 None 121 None
Leased 12 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.4 0.9 121 None 65 None
Leased 12 Small Grain Cover 5.4 0.0 121 None 65 None
Leased 12 Corn,Grain 5.4 0.0 121 None 65 None
Leased 13 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.7 0.0 204 None 640 None
Leased 14 Small Grain Overseed 63 0.0 188 None 118 None
Leased 1.4 Pearl Millett,Hay 6.3 0.0 188 None 118 None
Leased 14 Small Grain Ovarseed 6.3 0.0 188 None 118 None
Leased 14 Pearl Millett,Hay 6.3 0.0 188 None 118 None
Leased 15 Soybeans,Manured,Doable Crop 5.1 1.2 165 None 71 None
it15 Small Grain Cover 5.1 0.0 165 None 71 None
15 Corn,Grain 5.1 0.0 165 None 71 None
Leased 4 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.4 0.0 105 None 1g8 Hone
Leased 5 Sorghum-Sudan Hay 6.4 0.0 108 None 160 None
Owned I Small Grain Overseed 6.7 0.0 204 None 640 None
Owned 1 Pearl Millets,Hay 6.7 0.0 204 None 640 None
Owned 1 Small Grain Overseed 6.7 0.0 204 None 64o None
Owned 10 Sorghum-Sudan Hay -6.8 0.0 154 None 227 None
Owned 2 Small Grain Overseed 1 6.6 1 0.01 189 1 None 389 None
Owned 2 Pearl Millett,Hay 1 6.6 1 0.0 t 199 1 None 389 1 None
------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------••----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-22-2010 STV Page 1 of 2

oil Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
Owned 2 Small Grain Overs=d 6.6 0.0 189 None 389 None
Owned 2 Pearl Millett,Hay 6.6 0.0 189 None 389 None
Owned 3 Small Grain Overseed 6.8 0.0 151 None 300 None
Owned 3 Pearl Millen,Hay 6.8 0.0 151 None 300 None
Owned 3 Small Grain Overseed 6.8 0.0 151 None 300 None
ed 3 Pearl Millets,Hay 6.8 0.0 151 None 300 None
ed 8 Small Grain Overseed 7.2 0.0 305 None 539 None
Owned 8 Pearl Millett,Hay 7.2 0.0 305 None 539 None
Owned 8 Small Grain Overseed 7.2 0.0 305 None 539 None
Owned 8 Pearl Millets,Hay 7.2 0.0 305 None 539 None
Owned 9 Small Grain Overseed 6.1 0.0 464 None 412 None
Owned 9 Pear!Millett,Hay 6.1 0.0 464 None 412 None
Owned 9 Small Grain Overseed 6.1 0.0 464 None 412 None
Owned 9 Pearl Millett,Hay 6.1 0.01 464 None 412 None
i
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-22-2010 STV Page 2 of 2

0 0
The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity,this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Source Na rne Dairy Milk Cow Slurryo parlor water Design Storage Ca aci a s
Start Date 10/1 77
Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity(Days)
1 1 46
1 2 77
1 3 77
1 4 77
1 5 77
1 6 77
1 7 77
1 8 77
1 9 77
1 10 77
1 Il 77
1 12 46
2 1 15
2 2 77
2 3 77
2 4 77
2 5 77
2 6 77
2 7 77
2 8 77
2 9 77
2 10 77
2 11 47
2 12 16
'Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
---------------- .-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-22-2010 Capacity Page 1 of 1
I

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 11
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont,corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety"green book"and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2"deep.Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted Increase the seeding rate by 10%when
planting no-till.Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool,wet soil,banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants.An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter.The total amount of N is dependent on soil type.When
including a starter in the fertilizer program,the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn.Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
The following crop note applies to fields): 12, 15
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont,corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety"green book"and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.Plant 1-2"deep.Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted increase the seeding rate by 10%when
planting no-till.Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool,wet soil,banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants.An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter.The total amount of N is dependent on soil type.When
including a starter in the fertilizer program,the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
------------------ - --------------------------------------- --------------------
815NA Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 0421-2010 CropNote Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Small Grain: Piedmont
In the Piedmont,oats and barley should be planted from October 1-October 25;and rye from October
15-November 10.For barley,plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5%for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide". Also,increase the initial seeding
rate by at least 10%when planting no-till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2 deep. Adequate depth control is essential.Review the
NCSU Official Variety"green book"and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting.Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time.The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February-March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 14,2,3, 8,4
Small Grain: Piedmont
In the Piedmont,oats and barley should be planted from October 1-October 25;and rye from October
15 November 10.For barley,plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5%for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide". Also,increase the initial seeding
rate by at least 10%when planting no-till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre.Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2 deep.Adequate depth control is essential.Review the
NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time.The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February-March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 11
Double-Crop Soybeans,Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw,it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book"and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2"and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen.However,applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at plapting to
promote early growth and vigor.Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans.Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
815604 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-21-2010 Crop Note Page 2 of 3

e 0
The following crop note applies to field(s): 12, 15
Double-Crop Soybeans,Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw,it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book"and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8"drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15"rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2"and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen.However,applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor.Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans.Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 11
Small Grain Cover Crop
The following crop note applies to field(s): 12, 15
Small Grain Cover Crop
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Pearl Millett: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s): 14,2,3,8,9
Pearl Millett: No Continent
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 13
Sorghum-Sudan: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s):4,5
Sorghum-Sudan: No Comment
815604 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-21-2010 Crop Note Page 3 of 3

she Re 'r V
NCDA&CSAg=ojWc',DMdoq;, Otto 19)7314655.,' *eh ot 072551"!�.'
Grower Woody,Harold copies to.-
3545 East Greenboro Chaple Hill U
Snow Camp,NC 272,111M7
Waste A naiysis Rey'lort Farm:
Received: 04/0612010 Completed: 04/09/2010 Links to Helpful Information Alamance County
M WWS raw per�iHion .,!!!skqthcrwlse'n
&tmpk I& N P K Ca At S Fe Mn zn CU B MO Cl C
P T rota! 12041 2229 11037 10727 3628 1842 377 148 918 23.1 260
BV-N
waste COAIV NH4
SSD -NO3 Na Ni Cd A Al SO M PH S5 CJV Lw% CCB% ALE
Dewriptkx- OR-N 4608 34-57
D Surface Ursa
....... .........
Othei Elements`:;:.
Cro sltqn
Recomin Avallalile"'for'FIM'', raet basis
AAWCAMM Afetbod 5
Aia .
Iiozdact- ... I . U
4
2 1 4
Soq Inco .9
J.
.7 6.0� 001�'.
a
4 8.2 -:1
V-
.04
M Nx,%- RIM,
&Wpk LO. N P I Ca A(g S Fe Mn zn CU B MO a C
TOW 19160 3714 10673 17736 5127 2490 1073 158 194 47.7 27.6
RV-N
waste Code: -NH4
SSD -NO3 Na Ni Cd A Al so Ii PH SSCw DM% CM ALE(toris)
—
Description: OR-JV 4559 12.12
Dairy Surface Scmped Urea
P Ot Wax wet sh i
hii Elements ,Ib
.:: i
_NJ
Se Li
a
Ai Pb ]w
Brosdcsr ,9 5 2.6 0 75 0 36 0.16,
M 0.
U3 .......
8 .2 0.93 0.45� -.1.20 3' 04 .. .............
North Carolina
Reprogramming of the laboratory4nformation-management system that makes this report possible Is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quaUry.
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission Steve Traxler,Commission"of Agriculture

N®ARCS AgmI omic Uivisiod Phoic,1 l9)733-a5S5 Web site Www.ar .gov/agronumi/-„� Woody;Haro Report No'34419, pg 2
F Grower'..
Field lnfOrlllliti0ll ` ;°` Applicd`Liine Recommelidaiions • ; �- r^iti "� "a '`_" -
Sampk No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Line N P2& K20 mg S Cn Zn B Mn See Note
1131 Isl Crop: Corn Grain .97 120-160 0 10-30 0 0 0 0 .0 0 i
2nd Crop: Soybeans o 0 0 10-30 0 0 0 0 0
Test Results
Sou Cuss HM% W/V CBC BS% Ac p H P-I ICI Ca% A19% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I zn-AI CU-I S-I SS-I NO3-N NHaN Na
MIN 0.56 1.13 4.6 63.0 1.7 5.3 8o 63 42.0 15.0 343 223 216 121 121 85 35 0.0
Field Information Applied Lime Reoommeadauio>is -
Sampk No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K2O Arg S Co Za B Mn See Note
1231 1st Crap: Corn Grain ST 120-16o 0-20 0-20 0 0 0 0 .0 0 -3
2nd Crop: Soybeans 0 0 0-20 0-20 0 0 0 0 0 -3
Test Results
Sou Class HM% W/V CBC BS% Ac PH P-I ICI Ca% Alg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-I NO3-N NHaN Na
MIN 0.46 1.05 5.7 70.0 1.7 5.4 57 83 47.0 16.o 501 318 311 65 65 121 40 0.0
.. ..:...,. ;+.5 i "ti?- �! fx!
Fleld lmfo xuation sr .;Applied_I,iane Rec6mtnendati ii
Sampk No. Last Crop No Yr T/A COop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cn Zn B Mn See Note
1310 lst Crop: Corn Grain 0 120-160 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$
tad Crop: Soybeans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pH$
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CBC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mx-AI(l) Mn-AI(2) Zn I Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-I NO3-N NM4-N Na
MIN 0.51 1.11 12.0 95.0 0.6 6.7 375 153 66.0 23.0 164 105 98 640 640 204 48 0.1
-1 - •
r..
Field Information v R, €Applied Limey Reoommeadatiana �r ,. w :�
_ ... _ . . .r...... rti ^fi,..., __... _. ...-. ...... - _ -.., .�!'- ...t=�.,_.,. -.: _sue...-:-.i.t'u. �,: `F_ �� fM s'•i:..��.ti .v. �r r;r,'t �.�t.A ' "."?'- :. ;.,
Sampk No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P203 K20 NJ S Ca Zn B Ma See Note
2310 1st Crop: Corn Grain 0 120-160 0 0.20 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ .3
2nd Crop: Soybeans 0 0 0 0-20 0 0 0 0 pH$ 3
Test Results
Sou Class HM% W/V CBC BS% Ac PH RI K I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zx-I Zn AI Co-I S-1 SS-I NOj-N AWN Na
MIN 0.36 0.98 10.5 94.0 o,6 6.6 202 85 63.0 28.0 210 134 127 399 389 189 36 0.1
•v ',; -
Field(nfornultion :4 3 }- "Applied Lime Recamuieudations � r �, fir,! - u
�' _... ., .._. ,.,.n�f P•r.t..°'� ::_ ....-.._ ..
Sampk No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 KsO Mg S Cat Za B Mu - See Note
3310 1st Crop: Corn Grain 0 120-160 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$
2nd Crop: Soybeans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pH$ -3
Test Results
Solt Class HM% W/V CBC BS% Ae pH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cwl S-1 SS-I NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.41 0,99 11.2 96.o 0.5 6.8 179 113 62.o 28.0 210 131 124 300 300 151 54 0.1

N®A&C5'¢gronamlc D vision Phone-{919)733,2555 . Web site ww9v� .gov/agrooami/K Grower,:Woody,-Hs�raid a Repo t Na:;34419 ;- Pg 3:
Field°[nformatiaA Applied Lime RlCat111nEpdatiolts +�
x7 ;l
Sample No. last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Linea N P205 K20 Mg S co Zrr B Ala See Note
4310 1st Crop: Corn Grain 0 120-I60 0 50-70 0 0 0 0 .0 0 i
2nd Crop: Soybeans 0 0 0 50.70 0 0 0 0 0 t
Test Results
Solt CUSS mm W/V CBC BS% Ac pH RI K-I Ca% Mg% MU-1 Mn-AI(I) Ma-AI(2) Zn-I Yj AI Co-I S-I SS-I NO3 N NBW Na
MIN 0.46 1.07 9.9 91.0 0.9 6.4 92 40 62.0 27.0 99 70 63 188 188 105 43 0.1
Field Iaforalgion-;=.-- -y- ,,�, ApplledLime- :Recommendations
Sanrpb Na Lao Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P301 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Ma See Note
5310 1st Crop: Corn Grain 0 120-160 0 40-60 0 0 0 0 .0 0 .3
2nd crop: Soybeans 0 0 0 40-W 0 0 0 0 0 -3
Test Results
Soil Gass HM% W/V CBC BS% Ac pH RI K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-I Ma-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zu AI Ca-I S-I SS-I NO3N AW#-N Na
MIN 0.41 0.92 9.7 90.0 1.0 6.4 75 43 60.0 27.0 269 172 165 160 160 108 43 0.1
+ - - •a � .r.. K-. d,`f,. .� -»t'J t a t+y`m S- .y f. c''-} ,ry r. '�' S .K .,.: rr
FieldiofolYnatiaa
Sample Na Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zu B Ann See Note
6310 1st Crop: Corn Grain 0 120-160 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 PH$
2nd Crop: soybeans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pH$
Test Results
Solt Class Im W/V CBC BS% Ac pH P-1 K I COX Mgab Ma-I Afn-Af(I) Mn-AI(2) Za-I Zn-AI Ca-I S-1 SS-I NO3-N NHI-N Na
MIN 0.56 0.93 13.8 98.0 0.3 7.2 199 227 62.0 27.0 615 368 361 501 501 211 41 0.2
Zw. �.._-�{,,. p�::�u:�.�..•,.,�,,,, - - :�:^y-:t. - y""�. -.r -.� r x -.s�N��R°:- ':'`r P._:,$: s a'f°' k [: :Y�' s N '�c"^r '"�5•. �?'i � '�'�'7.n_ u♦
Sample Na Last Crop Mo Yr r/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Ng S Cu Za B Mn See Note
133to lst crap: Corn Grain LIT 120460 0 20-40 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1
2nd crop: soybeans 0 0 0 20-40 0 0 0 0 0 1
Test Results
Solt Class HM% W/V CBC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Alg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Za-AI Cu-I S I SS-I NO3-N Wo-N Na
MIN o.46 1.14 4.5 58.0 1.9 5.1 108 58 37.0 14.0 324 211 204 93 93 115 34 0.0
---•. _�_ - ..� �. - ::. ,- - , . ,�•- .ram - -- _ ->r.� _ e
Fuld"[nfaSm8ti0fl ��}a fi 'r '; per,,,,.,, .r1 = r fr l�' i: ,.
__.. .Lime., r,.RECQII1CndAti0n8c..' -. ..L. '�1�..:+e.:.#.:. a-7 S!if�: _r:.-a .��i-`... _�;:.s.
Sample Na Last Crop No Yr T/A Crop or Year Lim N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zu B AIa See Note
14310 Ist Crop: Corn Grain 0 120-160 0 0-20 0 0 0 0 .0 0
2nd Crop: Soybeans 0 0 0 .0-20 0 0 0 0 0 1
Test Results
Solt Gass lldl% W/V CBC BS% Ac PH P-I K-I CA% Mg% Ma-I Mx-AI(I) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I YA AI Cu-I S-I SS-I NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.36 1.07 7.5 85.0 1.1 6.3 117 78 52.0 28.0 573 356 349 118 118 188 37 0.1

N®Ad�CS Agronomic Division ,Phone�`(919)733 2b55 :WWeI site:,www� e.gai'/agronntnil _ Gso�ver Wordy,Haiold r .Repoit lea .344iq ,Jt.Fg:4
_-s +:.v}•.;i�f 7� -• --.
Field lnfatttioa •
'- 1��11e11 Lltile �Re00mtIIe�dAtlOtlb
•
-... ._. _._.. _ ...._-. _-
Sari pie No. Last Crop Mo Yr TIA Crop or Year lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Za B Mrt See Note
15310 1st Crop: Corn Grain 1.2T 120.160 20640 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 1
2nd Crop: Soybeans 0 0 20-40 0 0 0 0 0 0 i
Test Results
Sol!Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pM P-I K-I CON Mg% Mn-I Mx-AI(I) Nu-AI(2) Zn I Za-AI CO-1 S-I SS-1 NOkN NMrN Na
MIN 0.46 0.97 5.6 64.0 2.0 5.1 45 108 39.0 17.0 270 179 172 71 71 165 51 0.1
i
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory-information-inanagement system that makes this report possible Is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
A- Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
Ow -Steve Troxler,Commissioner of Ag&ulture
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission