010010_INSPECTIONS_20171231

v -2_ l - C, — o 7 z
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - } Division of Soil and Water Con-ation ,Q
O Other Agency
M
isit: Com Hance Inspection Operation Review p Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
r Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
A t000Am
Date of Visit: [JL/Jyf►/71 Arrival Time:® Departure Time: County: A I L ajnce egion: WS( _Q
Farm Name: r I n Ito, �_ �f��i1/l-5 Owner Email: h V`oor) Z 7 3 e bed 150�`� -111 4_
T�
Owner Name: Phone: P 3 303 1 -- b 3 S I
Mailing Address: 3 SAs C_ - !!�;,>, 01i] ,2 73 T q
Physical Address: i
Facility Contact: U&road Title: Phone: 3wn
Onsite Representative: nn Integrator:
Certified Opera r: Certification Number: q 7 q 7s--
Back-up Opera or: Certification Dumber:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 7j.S �t �S Longitude: 7 o t o l ind !1
Pram 17--40 F, NC C01 ' Sots -1 on Czo54 -C{n e.l HwY
r ox Irv► O VI
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow 1400
Wean to Feeder Non-Laver Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer 2CO
F I hc�
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts I Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys 35 f— e2 O+L/a t 7 Q
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:] Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the water l 'O Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued
_ r.

[Facility Number: - I C) Date of Inspection: Zh
Waste Collection & Treatment is W
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes J% No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
(r, L Identifier:
Spillway?: p 1-� ��•�
Designed Freeboard (in): S
Observed Freeboard(in): �
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes .1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a �� Nr Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 9Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [] Yes .gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NfNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy M u,Zn, etc
�.} C 01Ad noA- k'E-1,
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Inco to anurelSludge in o Bare So l n0
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application utside of Approved Area ��``����
12. Crop Type(s):
_AAL46=&� 1, dn
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes PgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes tSj'�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 2SfNo [] NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'? [N'Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? &J Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes,check Yet-,_rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. �"���
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does re cee ing need im rove '� ND Yes .[] No N NE
Waste Applicat' kly Freeboar Waste Analysis [t3 Soil Analysis e�rtmsfzrs Weather Code
Rainfall Stockin Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspection Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspection, 4
22. Did the facility fail to in am a rain gauge? es No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did ility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ``__❑ Yes ❑ No,�/"NA ❑ NE
Page 2of3 N� a� w a5 � a.v\aLj S 1 5 MI 551 nA�S+r F2.�7ll rl� 4����CO^tLne C
L00165 l 65+P_A Cnr r301 -7 h t r c, -PAN bQko_y\cc—.-. "`�'

Facilit Number: - jDate of Inspection- I Z J 17
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste applica i n equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No J54"'NA ONE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes JKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? �� Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document 4 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes CgNo 0 NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes J�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Ja Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspect' th an on-site representative? ❑ Yes J) ❑ NA ❑ NE
ae soi I e 5 ue I�
rNo
34. Does the facility require afollow-up visit by the same ag l 7-13 f a O(g Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recom ations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). $ i Aaj ?a 4 5 e
iv y I? fit Ka4 t 0-0 P y 0j Pe.-r OU o
a,c- 3 S_ T r cic 3sb 11 541 4
t r) w v P 2 co c
Fi e lA 5 * 0.5+ a-F 5+re a% �W� 1 SvV-z, .T W -tom w
'3J OL ddzd OLs+e_ Q
� P li C&Ai ors 7 `IRA
r ?&4-to r n a-- Cyr kl t eA r t rti �R w ? t p-er � " l cs
?It,-)fa_t- ,r t& In�vD t�&,5 te_ o n� p e e. w+u-P p N b
3 P051) n-K r0,T4 w& 5 -e_ ts.:i-"n i h l bo e,11?
atr�-e. Ona % rl 6V)L U C�robr�d w
C'e.r` CEOVA .'
0
P � w �5� a
�pe-VQerm PLR - wasbe, rum vn -Tr-6 c.t- 3O6 37 �"►ela5 �- b Fr
a6 v
o Cb . =CO>
�al �- �y Z 31 ;X0 e lur Solt
3 L
01 o / V. 9
Review nspector Name: r bL�✓ Phone:f3b1 7 tD 6
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. PDate: 1 2 b
Page 3 of 3 �/y� � ,Qg 64 JkAAJ_A� 1 S

a Division of'"later Resource
Faeility`Number` p�, - EIC` O Division of Soil and Water,aservation
p Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review p Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Z6 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: I 11 l6 i Arrival Time: Departure Time: .G PM County: UAnywCC Region: (A)�
Farm Name: 'nt1PLE �i•� MS Owner Email: .N61T
a
Owner,Name: 640R" �k_L3oo0\( Phone:
Mailing Address: 354S rc GR NsasRo Ro, SNo&, CAMD , NG a73�}dl__
.i
PhysicalLAddress:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone: 33 G•• 2L 13 . 8 644
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
V
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I 11-ayer Dairy Cow t-
Wean to Feeder I INon-Laver 11Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other �.
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ' Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: � Date of Inspection: 6
Waste Collection &Treatment
up
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [N�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 6-*T UfAabiT pt+ WAS*-PoN4
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): 7F,
Observed Freeboard(in): 7 34 44
111
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 4;1�Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) /YN
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Q5 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? KY
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes DjrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes NZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? `
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes QjrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA XNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops diner from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? JK Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes JFJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No NA NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No [j�NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: C)k jDate of Inspection. kki
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste app ation equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No 13U NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes EZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [4No [] NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
3 I. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the.facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
5,TMus aF CAWMP? �1E64i� ` i° laG ge�jtSCA�' L' "%'& cofl&'a 1� 't RGLO Uv►JS
09Ms-o-MR �Rs L W3 �I +��3+ +� mMPI.4TE Cg1�l rii Q ZN
06M TouP-
emu- v�ar�� � a4jz�
3.a
- R�+w Ght�66 V�StiAt_1.60 �� &UTMCS AkVs_ �I �i M, 1Off, G4�'&5
— PN+rnr't' hPP��c�-rtos Sa►s ?YeS, t�vcRso vuOa.R ���1. P�l�i
-� QC iota► VS-61m.'TLoN ES ASI'k5k46o o+� GMOnNI�h '� { r)%ST M13W G*1D%.)1a0 ? �C-S UCaO'KS
OT tS &_oc D,
L+.spE (ZbrAov60 inn puS -off ? 1(ES6RAof 0kR[ LOT
q0eebATt VLCA'T10fj '�R L�.S.'P �V(6" '^"''1 GRAM RNn fj j.T t%
-- P Lp FW15KQ0 ? (1&0 CIS ftot'\ 3� l
r Che-c.K iIZe43c" >us1 MOM c3FUV
CAup
1201S ON
35 8�
R-A)
In} W..� • k5 " (ZkELO �-
u�s, ocToo3&� RSAs Cain-O kj4 f3E aNtAfc&MO
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: 33G6 11�1g3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ail l�p
Page 3 of 3 21412015

Division of Water Resourc
Facility Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 O eration Review 0 Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I q li3jArrival Time: Departure Time:® County: Ajaj&4jnCe Region:
Farm Name: Tri Fo-rM5 Owner Email:
/i 1 }}
Owner Name: C�p_csr�� • ��[-TQ 1 D�� l�0od� Phone:
Mailing Address: _ �s �, (�re_A- 15 E7Dre)_[ , ,S n�« C'_ �] r N L 7 -3 _
Physical Address: SoLiA e,
Facility Contact: liq- ro W QQ� Title:�, �n per--1 p j Phone: 3 3 10 a-!' 3 jb
Onsite Representative: Hoor-old wnjd u Integrator:
Certified Operator: � nnA J Certification Number: 19 77 7-S—
Back-up Operator: ", Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ,�j5 �Y S �J Longitude: a ba
wv $-7 Fro,M �— o W 0(140 6�2�5boro "e-1 �f wY
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Laver Dairy Cow
Wean to feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder I Dry Poultry Ca aci Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I ILayers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
(}then LlOther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONO [DNA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes ❑ No 0 NA 0 NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes DRfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ONO ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Gor cr ke p� - yje p
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): lQ�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes CS�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a -14Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 14 Yes ❑ No [DNA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA CR'NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes,check the appropriate box below. [—] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ONE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NI3
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
acres determination? 1$
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [A'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ZYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriaZUP
x. toy bUl Lr
lffCheeklists [QR Design Omaps Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 'tQ�
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA PKrNE
23. if selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ONA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: 0 - 1 t7 Date of inspection: Raw
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No [NINA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No [5�IQA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA -00,
Other Issues NA1_
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes O�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Nam w 5 P ski tI > ds �a b� ce -r � added -& a Cft + A n'rutr�l
W&95 9. f Vvk- P laslCC w � n _
3� ��d �o Ike ,ri5><kit��c f i �s?eCh R u N� kk j l kk� is 'ir1 Co"kIaX\C_e_
4 h 6QP.t1 SSUPA p2rKt-6 Toja.�jI vl5+ {oC�_Ine_CV_ p ro Vers5 dIsrvu5
N to J\,uJ w0.s�e- QdnG� o �4-of� 5e_*�l YAP_n�
e. G wm t.va5�-e_Pte_n '` 1 / v�� de_ve-loP,2do
u7 w aS � o n ",o_
NQ- P n e S +o C� � a Y►P__n v�5 e✓ on P—s- oM I s
a
PeX r W oc>6 y l 0- 11 d_1 sfu r (o erg 5o i 1 15 to be
j` Soo- -hvr5 "ptke_5 !� lurv-7 wo-s{--e— -t- Mr' • 000d7 ho-5 Wse- solicy spr
9 Fac l l i f^� r�o_���4 �5 ? I a o CArn�'i sec{ �2 �-15 s�-i f{ n o f �e v-rvl,tit
a !, LNo record s rej u t r, cJ LIe,-f- 51 nce- P\rm�`� "Pik C,0_+,oK1 has n�jof-
U re_ Ce/ e_h 4- 'H �.55 1 V e- pPX ry I i t t of5 o o+ b e.-- l 1 $J o,:Cam! e
& 1 O'!5_ >✓ w P05 h Of-� T-" 0-+ ''01d F-re-e.544- 11 b o(.r-n " (be_+wP_,e_n ramp
an 6t I a-na rie,Cer V 1tn wee S
Reviewer/Inspector Name: S Pone: 116f cl b q q
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ff Date:
q ab L5
Page 3 of 3 33 � k U�P.r Se R[e_M-e 4 �r?_etVY_)(A - -r P P__r K - 2 4/20I4 `D�►Q V
d. QGlv2 iti c• Woodv llnAie � b� d-o rp�,hp,i

ODivision of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 010010 Facility Status: Inactive Permit: AWD010010 [] Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 08/13/2015 Entry Time: 01:15 pm Exit Time: 1:50 pm Incident#
Farm Name: Triple W Farms Owner Email: hwoody273@bellsouth.r
Owner: Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3545 E Greensboro Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Physical Address: 3545 E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Hwy Snow Camp NC 27349
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'54'15" Longitude: 79' 18-00"
Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauls Exxon-turn right-go 1/2 miles to farm on right.
Question Areas:
■ Waste Col, Stor,&Treat
Certified Operator: George H Woody Operator Certification Number: 997975
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Harold Woody Phone: [phone] Q
Primary Inspector: Me ssa Ro ebrock Phone' 336 ��
U - `6g +Q
A
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Today's visit was to check on the construction progress on the new uncertified waste structure.
6.Newest WSP still needs to be certified so that permit application can be submitted.Facility is still in violation of state
regulations and court order. No grading has occurred since last inspection of August 7,2015 due to some rain events and fact
that contractor has left to do anotherjob.
7.Still need to establish permanent grass/vegetation on embankment of uncertified waste structure.Weather conditions not
favorable now,however.
No rain forecast for next five days.Mr.Woody is to move cattle tomorrow in preparation for contractor's arrival on 8117/2015.Mr.
Woody is also trying to acquire/find a truck to use to haul soil away from construction site when contractor returns.Contractor to
move equipment to farm tomorrow to get ready for 811712015.
page: 1

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 08/13/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Structures Observed
Disignated
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Dry Stack WET STACK
Waste Pit PIT BEHIND MILK BARN
Waste Pond NEW WASTE POND
Waste Collection,Storage&Treatment Yes No Na Me
4_ Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed(Le./large ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable ❑ ❑ E ❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
page: 2

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 010010 Facility Status: Inactive Permit: AWD010010 [] Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Fallow-up County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 06/19/2015 Entry Time: 10:45 am Exit Time: 11:15 am Incident#
Farm Name: Triple W Farms Owner Email: hwoody273@belI South.r
Owner: Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3545 E Greensboro Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Physical Address: 3545 E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Hwy Snow Camp NC 27349
Facility Status: ❑Compliant M Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°54' 15" Longitude: 79°18'00"
Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauls Exxon-turn right-go 112 miles to farm on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge&Stream Impacts Waste Col,Stor,&Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents M Other Issues
Certified Operator: George H Woody Operator Certification Number: 997975
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa Ro$ebrock Phone:
Inspector Signature: 1 f Date: a Q s
vy
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Today's visit was unannounced since I could not reach Mr.Woody by telephone and he had not responded to an email I sent three
days ago.
4.,6.,7., 19.&20_Waste storage structure still needs to be emptied so that construction can be completed and the waste
structure certified and a CAWMP(Certified Animal Waste Management Plan)finalized.After completion of the CAWMP,a permit
application may be submitted to the Division of Water Resources.
9.Solid waste from various cattle lots is still washing into uncertified waste pond during precipitation events.While waste is not
going into the stream, it still needs to be collected and land applied.
14.Sorghum silagelhay may receive animal waste until August 31 per 4/21110 waste utilization plan(WUP).Receiving crop looks
good.To be cut soon per Mr.Woody.
18.Two 6300 gallon slurry tanks were on site,but not in use,today.Since June 2,2015 the commercial hauler has reportedly
hauled and applied approximately 100 loads over two full days to lower the waste level two feet in the new,uncertified,waste
structure.Mr.Woody stated that the commercial hauler's father died last week which stalled application events for the last week.
The area around the farm received about an inch of rain last night,with evidence of standing water observed on some farm roads
and on the land adjacent to the new waste structure.According to Mr.Woody,the commercial hauler did not want to drive from
Statesville to haul for just a half-day tomorrow(Saturday)and would not be applying waste on Sunday.Weather permitting,the
hauler plans to commence land application again on Monday June 22. Per Mr.Woody,the commercial hauler must finish this job
by the end of the month since he will be leaving for another contract beginning July 1,2015.MR.Woody continues to use his old,
degraded,honey wagon. It was not observed to be leaking to day though.
34.WSRO will need to inspect this facility regularly until a permit has been issued and the facility is compliant.
page: 2

r
Permit: AWD010010 Owner- Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle-Milk Cow 250
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Dry Stack WET STACK
Waste Pit PIT BEHIND MILK BARN 48.00
Waste Pond NEW WASTE POND 30.00
page: 3

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Discharges&5tream Impacts Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑
c.What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection,Storage&Treatment Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed(Le]large ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable ❑ ❑ M ❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into Mare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
page: 4

r
Permit: AWD010010 Owner- Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1 Sorghum,Sudex(Silage)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ N ❑ ❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ ❑ E ❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ IN ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Records and documents Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? M ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Soil analysis? ❑
Waste Transfers? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Stocking? ❑
page: 5

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Records and Documents Yes No Na No
Crop yields? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ 00 ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ N ❑
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ Cl ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No Na Ne
2& Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ M ❑ ❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? N ❑ ❑ ❑
page- 6

--` .0 M
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 010010 Facility Status: Inactive permit: AWD010010 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 06/02/2015 Entry Time: 10:39 am Exit Time: 12715 pm Incident#
Farm Name: Triple W Farms Owner Email: hwoody273@bellsouth.r
Owner: Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3545 E Greensboro Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Physical Address: 3545 E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Hwy Snow Camp NC 27349
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Faun: Latitude: 35°54' 15" Longitude: 79° 18'00"
Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauls Exxon-turn right-go 112 miles to farm on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge&Stream Impacts Waste Col,Stor,&Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: George H Woody Operator Certification Number: 997975
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: lvi�i�sa Rosebrock � �� Phone: to � Q
Inspector Signature: r Date:
Seconds nspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

o •
Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/02/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
2.and 3.Evidence of past run-off of sediment and waste observed in stream. Mr.Woody has now excluded the cattle from surface
waters.Well constructed permanent fencing now establishes a 50-foot setback on each side of the stream.Many sections of the
stream show signs of beginning to repair itself.Some 6-8 inch wide sections of stream are now clear.Stream has several
meanders and bends.Mr"Woody was ask to establish vegetation in the buffer.
4.Animal waste is within 6 inches of flowing through the spillway of the new waste storage structure.
6. Per the engineer,construction of the new waste storage structure is about 85%complete.The structure is designed to catch
and store waste run-off from dairy lots(i.e.serve as a storm water waste structure)as well as parlor water waste. The structure
has been in use since 2014 even though the installation has not yet been certified by engineer,Larry Graham,of Environmental
Engineering Services.
7.New waste structure needs to be certified.To be able to do this,additional soil needs to be removed from southeast corner of
waste structure and the embankment shaped.An inlet pipe also needs to be installed to collect waste from feeding area south of
structure and convey the waste into the new structure. Permanent vegetation needs to be established on the embankments and
the dam.The dam needs to be mowed as soon as possible,too"
8. Marker is not required yet since the facility is not permitted.
9.A large amount of waste,2-4 feet deep,has accumulated to the east of the'old"freestall barns and west of the unused
Harvestorelwaste tank.Waste is currently pushed from the ramp at the old freestall barns onto the ground(uncontained)or is
being allowed to flow from the concrete lot and onto the ground(uncontained),downhill,to where the waste ultimately flows into
the new waste structure.All of this waste needs to be removed and properly land applied.
14.4/21/2010 waste plan written by Hal Langenbach of Agri-Waste Technology,Inc(for Clean East)lists Fall/Winter crop as small
grain overseed or cover.Mr.Woody maintained small grain(not overseed)this past winter.
15.Winter small grain wheat silage is being removed.Grass and sorghum silage to be planted within 30 days.
17.Cannot determine if there is enough land onto which to apply waste until a completed waste plan is developed that
incorporates all the available application fields.The waste plan also needs to be revised to include the correct number of cattle
that are now confined.
18.Mr.Woody's liquid waste tank is so degraded that it no longer holds waste without leaking,however,he still continues to use it
to land-apply animal waste.The solid spreader appears to function properly.Mr.Woody relies on a commercial hauler to remove
the waste from the new 3,380,000 gallon(when full)waste structure.
19.and 20. Facility is maintaining at least 305 confined cattle and at least 123 additional cattle on pasture that is denuded in
some places,especially around the feeding area to the south of the new waste storage structure.
28.One dead cow was observed downslope of the old freestall barns.Could not confirm if it had been dead more or less than 24
hours.
30.,22.,and 24. Since this facility does not yet have a permit,there is no requirement to report high waste levels,install a rain
gauge,or calibrate the waste application equipment.
32. Mr,Woody has not yet applied for a permit.The new waste structure first needs to be completed and certified and the waste
plan revised and updated prior to applying for a permit.These are are in violation of the Alamance County Superior Court Order
#12-CVS-001864)"
34. DWR will continue to monitor the farm's progress towards achieving compliance with both announced and unannounced
visits.
page: 2

0
Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/02/15 inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle-Milk Cow 250 304
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Dry Stack WET STACK 12.00
Waste Pit PIT BEHIND MILK BARN 52.00
Waste Pond NEW WASTE POND T
6.00
page: 3

Permit: AWD010010 Owner- Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/02/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Discharges&Stream Impacts Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
c.What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the M ❑ ❑ ❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection,Storage&Treatment Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? M ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? M ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable ❑ ❑ S ❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ ❑ ❑ E
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu,Zn, etc)? ❑
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
page: 4

i •
Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/02/15 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1 Fescue(Hay,Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Sorghum,Sudex(Silage)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain(Wheat,Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ ❑ ❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ E ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ ❑ N ❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ N
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Soil analysis? ❑
Waste Transfers? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Stocking? ❑
page: 5

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/02/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Records and Documents Yes No Na No
Crop yields? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ M ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
appropriate box(es)below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26 Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ E ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ ❑ ❑ E
Other Issues Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ N ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ E ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? N ❑ ❑ ❑
page: 6

iDivision of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 010010 Facility Status: Inactive Permit: AWD010010 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 02/03/2015 ` Entry Time: 11:10 am Exit Time: 1:35 pm Incident#
Farm Name: Triple W Farms Owner Email: hwoody273@bellsouth.r
Owner: Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3545 E Greensboro Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Physical Address: 3545 E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Hwy Snow Camp NC 27349
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°54'15" Longitude: 79" 18'00"
Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauls Exxon-turn right-go 112 miles to farm on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge&Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star,&Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: George H Woody Operator Certification Number: 997975
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Harold Woody Phone: [phone]"
On-site representative Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Primary inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
michael shepherd
Inspection Summary:
page 1

I�
Permit: AWD010010 Itner-Facility : Y Harold Wood tacilityNumber: 010010
Inspection Date: 02/03/15 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
2. Evidence of the discharge of waste from parlor lot and pit remains on the ground. Discharge from parlor pit has ceased. Mr.
Woody repaired crack in concrete wall.
3.Area/buffer along stream and ditches needs permanent vegetation to help filter sediment and waste run-off from denuded lots
caused by excessive cattle activity. Mr.Woody stated that a 50 ft. buffer could be established to exclude cattle by sometime in
March 2015.
6.New waste structure has not been completed,certified,or incorporated into a CAWMP.
7.New waste structure needs to be graded and have vegetation established on embankment to control erosion.Deep ruts are
present.
8.New waste structure will need marker prior to receiving permit.
9.Waste is running off denuded lots and into ditches and streams. MUST keep cattle out of the low part of the farm, i.e.woods.
Need to repair fence to exclude cattle.
9. Berm to be installed around uncovered manure stack near pregnant cow bam to contain waste. Mr.Woody stated that he plans
to clean up this area.
9. Per Mr.Woody milk parlor waste to be put into the new waste storage structure when conveyance pipe is installed in March
2015.
14.Current WUP lists"small grain overseed"while field is actually in small grain for harvest.
17. No fields are reportedly available for application of new waste pond waste until small grain is removed in March or April.
18.Current slurry tank is not adequate since it leaks waste.
19. Farm has a minimum of 329 confined animals. This number did NOT include all the animals on denuded lots.
20.Current WUP lacks checklists,correct crops,and correct animal numbers.
34. DWR will need to follow-up often until permit is issued.
page: 2

Permit: AWD010010 fwner-Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 02/03/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle-Dairy Calf 138
Cattle-Dairy Heifer 25
Cattle-Milk Cow 250 166.
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350.000
Waste Structures Observed
Disignated
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Dry Slack WET STACK
EPITWaste Pit
BEHIND MILK BARN
page: 3

t
` Permit: AWD010010 4pwner- Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 02/03/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Discharges&Stream Impacts Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ S ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ M ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the M ❑ ❑ ❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection,Storaqe&Treatment Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6.Are there Structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ ❑ ❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application Yes No Na No
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu,Zn, etc)? ❑
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
page: 4

Permit: AWD010010 fwner- Facility : Harold-Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 02/03/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1 Fescue(Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain(Wheat,Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste M ❑ ❑ ❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ E ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? N ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify '
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Soil analysis? ❑
Waste Transfers? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Stocking? ❑
page: 5

T • •
Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 02/03/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne
Crop yields? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ 1:10 ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT) certification? [] ❑ ❑
Otherlssues Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 1:10 ❑
(i.e., discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ E
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
page: 6

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010010 Facility Status: Inactive Permit: AWD010010 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit:\ 01/27/2015 Entry Time: 01:15 pm Exit Time: 3:30 pm Incident#
Farm Name: Triple W Farms Owner Email: hwoody273@bellsouth.r
Owner: Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3545 E Greensboro Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Physical Address: 3545 E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Hwy Snow Camp NC 27349
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°54' 15" Longitude: 79° 18'00"
Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauis Exxon-turn right-go 1/2 miles to farm on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge&Stream Impacts Waste Col,Stor,&Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues.
Certified Operator: George H Woody Operator Certification Number: 997975
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Harold Woody Phone: [phone]"
On-site representative Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 01/27/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Today's announced inspection was to follow-up with the owner,tech specialist,engineer,and grading contractors regarding
progress on construction of the new waste pond and to evaluate the current state of the waste management system.All parties
were present.
1.A discharge of animal waste from the concrete lot behind the milking parlor was actively occurring during today's inspection. It
appears that the concrete in the berm in the lower corner of the lot has degraded such that waste cannot be contained.Manure
was flowing over the unvegetated ground and into a wet weather branch which flows into waters of the State.This type of
discharge was also observed and noted in a April 24,2012 inspection.
1.The discharge of waste from a 3800 gal slurry tank was actively occurring during the inspection.The slurry tank was degraded
such that it can no longer hold liquid.Mr.Woody stated that the battery on the tractor used to pull the tank was"dead"and that he
would try and get the tractor started so that the tank could be moved and the contents land applied. DWR NOVINOI.
2.A visual examination of the build-up of waste below the concrete lot suggests the discharge of waste from the concrete lot
behind the milk parlor has been occurring for several months(minimum).
3.Several acres of land around the animal barns is denuded.Large ruts,caused by rain,channel the run-off of sediment and
waste downhill and into the wet weather ditch.
3.The areas along and near the wet weather ditches and streams are severely eroded and denuded due to excessive cattle
activity.Need to exclude cattle and establish permanent vegetation along stream to help filter sediment and animal waste.
4.Per Mr.Woody,the uncovered pit located behind the milk parlor holds about two-days worth of milk parlor waste.This is clearly
not adequate.Once the new waste storage pond is completed,an underground pipe is to convey waste from the parlor waste pit
into the storage pond.Approximatly 30 feet of pipe has been installed and is located beneath the surface of the new pack barn,
with several hundred additional feet of pipe needed.
6.The new waste storage structure is not addressed in the waste plan since the most recent waste plan(4121/2010)pre-dates
the construction of the new structure.Will need to be incorporated into the new CAWMP prior to submittal of permit application.
7.Construction of the new waste pond,started in 2013,shows evidence of severe erosion on the interior of the dam.The exterior
portion of the dam still needs to be graded and vegetation established.The spillway has not yet been constructed either.
8.The new waste structure lacks a marker.To be installed before certification of new waste storage structure.
9.See#3.
14.Current crops available for receiving animal waste do not match those listed in the current WUP.Waste plan needs to be
revised to include the current cropping system.
16.Irrigation design has not been completed.Mr.Woody stated that he does not wish to apply waste through irrigation.He plans
to use the services of a commercial hauler to land apply animal waste.
17.Animal waste from new waste storage structure needs to be removed and land applied so that construction and certification of
waste structure can be completed.Currently,Mr.Woody lacks enough land(with an available receiving crop)onto which to apply
the waste. Land is in wheat and is too far along for a slurry tank to broadcast waste without damaging crop.
18.The slurry tank and tractor used for the collection and application of waste from the parlor and holding lot is not adequate.The
concrete pit located near the milk parlor can, per Mr.Woody,store waste for about two days.The tank used for hauling the waste
from the pit is so badly rusted-through,that waste was observed flowing from the tank and onto the ground.The tractor was not
working on the date of our inspection due to a dead battery.DWR NOVINOI.
Mr.Woody relies upon a commercial hauler for application of waste from the new(unfinished)waste storage structure. He utilizes
a solid spreader to apply solid waste from the dry stack.
19,Operation still maintains more than 100 confined cattle--with no permit.DWR NOWN01.
20,and 32.Alamance County Superior Court Order(#1 2-CVS-001 864)stipulated in March 2013 that waste pond and waste plan
page: 2

Permit: AWD010010 Owner- Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 01/27/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
were to be completed within 60 days.Construction and certification of waste pond has not been completed and a
completelaccurate waste plan has not been developed.VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER,
21.Per Mr.Woody,a waste analysis was not performed for the animal waste applied by Southers.Application of waste per
agronomic rates cannot,therefore,be confirmed.
22.Suggest that rain gauge be installed.Not required,however,until permit has been issued.
24.Calibration of equipment not required until permit has been issued.
34.DWR to perform follow-up inspections to evaluate waste management compliance,including construction progress.
page: 3

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 01/27/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle-Milk Cow 250
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Dry Stack WET STACK
Waste Pit PIT BEHIND MILK BARN
page: 4

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 01/27/15 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Discharcies&Stream Impacts Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ❑ ❑ []
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field ❑
Other
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(if yes, notify DWQ) 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
c.What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the Slate(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes, notify DWQ) 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ ❑ ❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection,Storage$Treatment Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes,is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./large ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a M ❑ ❑ ❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ ❑ ❑
to roofed pits,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application Yes No Na No
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ ❑ ❑ M
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ M
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu,Zn, etc)? ❑
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
page: 5

s
Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 01/27/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1 Small Grain(Wheat,Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste i ❑ ❑ ❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ 1:10 ❑
determination?
W. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis? ❑
Waste Transfers? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Stocking? ❑
page: 6

0
Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility : Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 01/27/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne
Crop yields? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check the ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
appropriate box(es)below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ E ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Otherlssues Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ E ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 1:10 ❑
(i.e., discharge,freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
page: 7

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010010 Facility Status: Inactive Permit: AWD010010 _ n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Alamance_ _- Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit:\, 01/15/2014 � Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time: 02:40 PM Incident#:
Farm Name: Triple W Farms Owner Email: hwoodv273(a7bellsouth
Owner: Harold Woody Phone: [phone]Q44
Mailing Address: 3545 E Greensboro Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Physical Address: 5545 E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Hw,y, Snow Camp NC 27349
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: . Latitude: 35'54'15" Longitude: 79°17'60"
Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauls Exxon-turn right-go 112 miles to farm on right.
Question Areas:
0 Waste Col, Stor, &Treat
Certified Operator:George H Woody Operator Certification Number: 997975
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Harold Woody Phone. [phone]
On-site representative Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

3
0
Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 01/15/2014 Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Today's visit was to check on the progress of the WSP. Mr. Woody was able to meet with me, however, his engineer(Larry Graham)
and contractors (Donnie, Loy, and Jeremy Thomas)were present. Contractor's number: 919.548.1247,�-- Let T�00\0,5
The new waste storage structure was constructed a little wider and not as deeply as planned, due to rock formations discovered
during excavation. Not a DWR concern. The Division will receive As-Builts after completion. The construction area is to be seeded
once all the land disturbing activity is finished.
Requested that Mr. Woody consider installing vegetated waterways and/or diversion ditches to help exclude some of the fresh water.
Mr. Graham slated that diversions are to be installed and will discuss the potential for a waterway(across the road)with Mr.Woody.
Also discussed proposed irrigation fields and pulls with Mr. Graham.
A sediment basin is planned to capture solids prior to them entering the waste structure. Mr. Woody will have to maintain the basin
and remove the solids and land apply them periodically.
There were no unpermitted discharges of waste observed today. All of the lot run-off and silage ieachate is being excluded from
surface waters.
The soil was extremely wet today.The contractor staled that if soil conditions were good, they might be able to complete the
contruction in about three weeks.
Page: 2

rti
Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 01/15/2014 Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard freeboard
ID ry Stack WET STACK
k1ste Pit PIT BEHIND MILK BARN
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? D ■ 0 D
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./large trees, severe fl ■ ❑ rl
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable to roofed pits, ■ D 0 D
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or 0 ■ 0 1)
improvement?
Page: 3

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010010 Facility Status: Inactive Permit: AWD010010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up _ County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit:\ 06/20/2013 _ Entry Time: 12_14_PM Exit Time: 01:00 PM Incident#:
Farm Name: Triple W Farms Owner Email: hwoodv2730)bellsouth
Owner: Harold Woody Phone: 336-213-§644
Mailing Address: 3545 E Greensboro Rd __ Snow Camp NC 27349
Physical Address: 3545 E Greensboro-Chapel Hill Hwy Snow Camp NC 27349
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35*54'15" Longitude: 79°17'60"
Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauls Exxon-turn right-go 112 miles to farm on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge&Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, &Treat Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AW0010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
1., 2., 3.,4., & 7.At least 231 cattle were observed on severely denuded lots or in various barns.
Previous discharge from the concrete lot area was still occurring. New discharge from push oft ramp of old freestall barn was
documented. Both waste streams converged, and continued flowing downhill into the denuded ditch which leads to a UT to Mary's
Creek(NSW; Class-C).Animal waste was observed in the ditch. This ditch has been cleared of all vegetation, presumably in
preparation for construction of the new waste storage pond. Construction has not yet begun.
Cattle waste is not being contained to the barns, lots, and wet stack as some waste had run-off these areas. At least 52 cattle have
access to a spring-fed ditch which is severely eroded and completely denuded.
33. 1 called Mr. Woody at approximately 11:30am and told him I was in the area and would like to come by the farm and check on the
progress of the new waste storage pond construction. He said that it had been very wet this Spring and that they had not started but
would try to get equipment on site the next day or the day after.He slated that he was in the field getting hay up and could not meet
with me. I ask Mr.Woody if it was ok to look around for a few minutes without him being present. He said okay and to come on. I said
I would be there about 12:00pm.
34. This facility is under a Consent Order to construct a permanent structure to contain the parlor and lot wastes by August 1, 2013.
Prior to August 1, 2013 DWQ will need to evaluate Mr.Woody's progress again.
Page: 2

Permit: AW0010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Fallow-up
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle- Milk Cow 250 T 231
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
ry Stack WET STACK
aste Pit PIT BEHIND MILK BARN
Page: 3

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Follow-up
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ■ n n n
Discharge originated at:
Stru ctu re ❑
Application Field n
Other ■
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ O ❑ Q
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
c.What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ■ n n n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ■ ❑ D n
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? 01100
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? n
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./large trees, severe ❑ n ■ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ n ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ■ n ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ❑ ■ n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ■ n n n
improvement?
Other Issues - Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report n ■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional n ■ n n
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, n n ■ n
freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? n n n ■
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field n
Page: 4

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 06/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
Lagoon I Storage Pond n
Other
If Other, please specify
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n n n ■
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ■ n n
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ■ n ❑ n
Page: 5

`, Division of Water Facility Number - F/Al O Division of Soil and WaterResouirces Con
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other Q Denied Acce 13
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: P County: Ala a Region: L&),5 k6
Farm Name:_I r� %j 60LCmf Owner Email: hL�7p�,i u 2-73
Owner Name: Phone: 336 r]ro• 3S7
�� 11 0
Mailing Address: WA2 O �• o I v G ��
Physical Address: A/
Facility Contact: as rr n ld Woo d Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
r3
Certified Operator: Certification Number: S
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:_g o -5-AI I IS11 Longitude: 17 ` 42011
Z oZ fo us #�1 5/:17- $SN- �2 hf an to ! 4-mOnce_ Gh rah
C Ex� 1 7-S Tv rns i n4o w e,6n Ch e-1' 11 F"au�-n�r o LrN
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I 11-ayer y Dairy Cow IOU
Wean to Feeder )Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer 5
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca aci Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish ILayers I Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layer Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
s there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Wyes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than roj a discharge?
041 1 -F ` 'O IIYItG fPage I of 3 2L4/2Y"131jl-
4 Continued
a nt �1 f r_M a I i� S. �lS��a rc�� turn JCL p ; t �►as cen 5 �

Facility Number: Q - . Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? 0 Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes J0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 L Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: We_"[ &O L e uD
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
0Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [ ] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
go
yofque he stions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
any of t structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No XNA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
oes any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ( NE
maintenance or improvement? T�
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?if yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop
Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �QQT
1 . Soil Type(s):
4 Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No PrNA ❑ NE
acres determination? �/
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? pCl Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18 Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? XYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
e uired Records& Documents
id the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1 Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—] Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

I
Facili Number: Of - Date of Inspection: �.
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste applic' Ion equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No JV"NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes I] No [)rA I] NE
the appropriate box(es)below,
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 2fNE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ,0EIINA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [] No [D NA D2 NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? I] Yes P�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes pCr�N(►o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? WYes J Now ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
FA+�/ bud'-�- a.l o n9 s,frer�.m vP- oCi fc�he5 r�e�s Pam-ma�.n�n-f ve����-ia
-to � �'-'r �-�✓ se-�.�m�-{"QI-ccxt.5f� run of� 4:'r-orn d&vlvd 'p-a 10+5 C:ctQLSeA
b� e,xc4e"sst Ve, C-0L*1e_ dLo_ - v i ro be. dow le}p—d bj �A ao �5
(o N�uJ was+e, sf&r e, 5+t-L _+V r� has nod �-�
Ce-r 4k Ge d or I n e o r &+end V1t0 o►- �-►� w P .
7. N 0 t x +I e, 5 J,r%)c*u,ram na8,A � be, re AeL� �-h aj� V e:4
5-te� b C►s hel on ,bo 1�-�n � fio Can cos 10>7 , �p rof5 �5
luP 5 i-r uct�'v ri tw 1 L� hieA ma-r K-e✓r r for o re.Ce-4 v i,+n P,2xr m
q h�a i s 1r'u n nun of d �1 I n#- +Ay1+0 c� i-k�-h6, s¢-l- S�I`!� U s i
lo w tr#- o c m , i.e, up sp�e , o r'1 qi r �
Curr SUP 115� Sr)Mt r n ove r-s U_'3 l It t✓ rop 15 ��
SMa.1,l cc��r�n �r harve.5t, �] .
1� No Fiefs , re.�or+64 L W&i[a-bI��r �P(IGaon of ne.c.� wuP to
u n-1 I Groff 5 r�tm ova ' Y1 K&_4rG h o rA�r i I ,
$ -nV-- t s f\oi- aide--?) s ince— i
(',urrerti� 5'[vrrt� 'Fa 1eA1�-5 WA-S1'
D CA.)rre y-vt-w u P a�l� z+.h e c k 1:4 5 t51 CAD r rem bro p 5 4- an"i fty&j n u
D v.) � L 3 I need - o lbt� u p oCteX_, �,n,I-i 1 P�-r- m l-1- i s issued•
n car' a_ v W a P i h
ewer/Inspector arpe: t�jV�D!5e-b ro[.e—_ Phone: 710
eavi 115 � �(A t .t,� uhC u n C6\/p_r ti�ct v r� kec,�- o
Reviewer/Inspector Sigi re. . Date: 3
Page 3 of 3 ` \ 21412014

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010010 Facility Status: Inactive Permit, AWD010010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 04/24/2012 Entry Time: 11:30 AM Exit Time: 12:50 PM Incident#:
Farm Name: Triple W Farms Owner Email: hwoody273 a0beflsouth
Owner: Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3545 E Greensboro Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Physical Address: 3545 E Grpgnsboro-Chapel Hill Hwy inow Camp NC-27349
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'54'15" Longitude: 79°17'60"
Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauls Exxon-turn right-go 1/2 miles to farm on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge&Stream Impacts Waste Col,Stor, &Treat Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: `Melissa Rosebrock ' Phone:
Inspector Signature: `F; Date: Q I+� �G I ~
r
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 04/24/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit. Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
1.,2.and 4.Storage capacity for parlor waste is not adequate. Overflow and run-off from the small concrete pit at the back of the barn
and run-off from the slurry spreader loading area,were flowing onto the concrete cattle lot. Since the manure is not contained to the
lot, I observed and tracked the flaw of manure from the lot and its discharge into waters of the State. I anticipate that the discharge is
chronic since the discharge Pow has caused the ground to channel.There were no berms,or vegetated buffers to hinder the
discharge.
Mr.Woody was instructed to constructed a temporary earthen damlberm to stop the flow of waste into the creek. He subsequently
sent photos shoing that this had been completed.
3.and 9.The area along the surface water is severely eroded,allowing continued soil erosion to occur. Need to establish permanent,
vegetated, buffers to help control soil and waste run-off. Buffers look better but could still use some work to vegetate the denuded
areas.
6.,7., 19.and 20. Per Mr.Woody's March 2012 computer records,there were 300 total cows at the facility. Of the 300, 215 were milk
cows. During today's visit, I counted at least 225 cattle in various pens, on dry packs, and in barns(i.e.confined). Per January and
February 2012 milking records,there have been between 225-237 cows confined at this farm. Mr.Woody has not yet obtained a
completed Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and has not obtained the required cattle waste permit.
Since our last inspection, Mr.Woody has constructed a new 30,000 ft.barn that reportedly cost about$120,000.A roofed,concrete,
wet stack has also been constructed to contain the solid lot scrapings. Liquid waste(parlor and lot)has still not been adequately
contained.
The pit behind the parlor has about 60 inches of"freeboard"and the new wet stack about 72 inches.
Page: 2

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 04/24/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle-Milk Cow 250 237
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Dry Stack NEW CONCRETE 72.00
aste Pit PIT BEHIND MILK BARN 60.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 0412412012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Discharges &Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ■ ❑ ❑ Cl
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ■
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(if yes, notify DWQ) ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
c.What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes, notify DWQ) ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
3_Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage&Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees,severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19.Did the facility fall to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ■
Checklists? ■
Design? ■
Maps? ■
Page: 4

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility. Harold Woody Facility Number: 010010
Inspection Date: 04124f2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Lease Agreements? ■
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Soil analysis? ❑
Waste Transfers? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment(NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check the appropriate ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
box(es)below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Other issues Yes No NA NE
Page: 5

Permit: AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number. 010010
Inspection Date: 04/24/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?(i.e., discharge, ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
If yes,check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
33,Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34.floes the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

.y
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 010010 Facility Status: Inactive Permit: AYVD010010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Alamance Region: Winston&alem
Date of Visit: 05/01/2009 _. Entry Time:09.40 AM Exit Time: 11 40 AM Incident#:
Farm Name: Triple W F-arms Owner Email:
Owner: Harold Woody Phone: OQO-376&359
Mailing Address: 3545-E Greensboro Rd Snow—Camp NC 2_7_349
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°54'_5 Longitude: 79°17'Q0"
Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauls Exxon-turn right-go 112 miles to farm on right.
Question Areas:
tj Discharges&Stream Impacts Waste Collection&Treatment Waste Application
tj Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1
1

Permit:AVVD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number:010010
Inspection Date:05/01/2009 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
1. The discharge of animal waste was observed from a leak in the pipe carrying waste from the parlor to the concrete pit. The pipe
needs to be repaired immediately.Waste from the discharge had not yet reached surface waters.
3. Red sludge worms,foam,waste odor,and waste/sediment solids were observed in various streams around the farm. Sediment and
waste was 2-8 inches deep in most places due to stream bank erosion caused by excessive cattle traffic in and around the streams
and denuded pastures.
6. Concrete parlor waste pit and blue"Harvestore"tank need to be addressed in a CAWMP if they are to be used. Concrete pit has
about 2.5 days of storage per Mr.Woody. He uses a 3000 or 3500 gallon (he wasn't certain which) honey wagon with which to apply
the waste from the concrete pit. He is applying waste to Johnson grass/drilled sorghum fields that will be chopped for silage in August.
He applies waste to annual rye in the winter which is then harvested for silage in the late spring. Mr. Woody gives animal waste to
Stephen Israel(sp.?)for a hay crop and then buys hay and shell corn from Mr. Israel and others.
7. &9.The blue tank will need to be retrofitted with a new pipe to carry lot waste from the existing junction box into the tank. Junction
box will need to be cleaned out as well. Several feet of guttering will be needed to divert rainwater from lot. Several linear feet of berm
will be needed to contain waste to the lot.
10. Fields to be utilized for application will need to have buffers established.
28. Facility is maintaining more than 100 cattle(threshold limit)and has failed to apply for or obtain the required permit.Approximately
160 dairy cattle were onsite today.
33. DWQ will need to inspect this facility for compliance again after CAWMP is implemented and cattle are excluded from streams.
DWQ will send Mr.Woody a copy of this inspection as well as a copy of the 2/26109 inspection by email to: [e-mail]
Page: 2
1

Permit:AWD010010 Owner-Facility; Harold Woody Facility Number:010010
Inspection Dale: 05/01/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle-Milk Cow 250 160
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kasle Pit PIT BEHIND MILK BARN 36.00
Page: 3
a

Permit:AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number:010010
Inspection Date:05/01/2009 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ■ ❑ Q ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ■
a.Was conveyance man-made? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes, notify DWQ) ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 ■ ❑ 0
3.Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ■ Q ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed(I.e./large trees, severe ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
erosion, seepage,etc.)?
6.Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ■ ❑ ❑ n
or closure plan?
t 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ Cl ■ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ON
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? In
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu,Zn,etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit:AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number:010010
Inspection Date: 05/01/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Sorghum,Sudex
(Silage)
Crop Type 2 Summer Annual
Crop Type 3 Small Grain(Wheat,
Barley,Oats)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Sol Type 1
Soit Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
16 Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
17 Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additionai problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5
i

Permit:AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number:010010
Inspection Date: 05/01/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ Q ■ 0
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 00110
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ■ Cl ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency II---II
Facility Number: W0010 Facility Status: Inactive Permit: AWD010010 D Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Complaint - County: AI n Region: Winston-Salem T
Date of Visit: 02/26/2009 Entry Time:12700 PM Exit Time: 12:30 PM Incident#:
Farm Name: Triple W Farms Owner Email:
owner: Harold Woodv Phone: Q40-376-6359
Mailing Address: 3545-E Greensboro Rd Snow Camp-NC 27349
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 4'1 " Longitude: 79°17'60"
Take 87 south 13 miles to Dauls Exxon-turn right-go 112 miles to farm on right.
Question Areas:
Discharges& Stream Impacts Waste Collection&Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s). Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Harold Woody Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Melissa Rosebrock Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
18. On the date of my visit the waste application equipment was broken and was being repaired.
19. Today's visit was to follow-up on an annonymous complaint alleging that this facility maintains more than 100 cattle.According to
milk production records,this facility has maintained more than 100 dairy cows since 2005.
32. Mr.Woody was not on site,but I spoke with him the next day. l informed him of the 100-cow threshold level and the NOVINOI
letter to be sent.
33. DWQ to perform another inspection to evacuate potential environmental concerns.
Page: 1

• • 1 . . .
Permit:AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number;010010
Inspection Date: 02/26/2009 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle-Milk Cow 250 160
Total Design Capacity: 250
Total SSLW: 350,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
rite Pit PIT BEHIND MILK BARN 8.00
Page: 2

Permit:AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number:010010
Inspection Date: 02/2612009 Inspection Typo:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a.Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State?(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes,notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
3.Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage &Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./large trees, severe Cl ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage,etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?(Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
improvement?
11 Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals(Cu,Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit:AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number:010010
Inspection Date: 02/26/2009 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Q
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Q
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type i
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ Q Q ■
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ■ Q Q Q
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? Q ❑ ❑ ■
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? Q
Page: 4

Permit:AVVD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number:010010
Inspection Date: 02/26/2009 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Complaint
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall&monthly? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form(NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment(NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT)certification? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
mortality rates.that exceed normal rates?
30.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit:AWD010010 Owner-Facility: Harold Woody Facility Number:010010
Inspection Date: 0212612009 Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q ❑ ❑ ■
32. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ ■ Q ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ■ Q 0 ❑
Page: 6

tv:�
`Ak k
❑DS C �maI Feedlbt Operation Revlevi t f
WQ Animal Feedlot Operatlon Slte Inspect[on
a : i 3;., -„ :,� M
Pz
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number �0 Time of Inspection 'S 24 hr.(hh:mm)
,,,_,` Total Time (in fraction of hours
l�f
Farm Status: xegistered ❑Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review , 0
❑Certified ❑Permitted or Inspect-ion includes travel andprocessing)
❑Not Operational Date Last Operated: .......................................................................................
Farm Name: ............. t/g1f� ._.......w ......Fez�rzr-ram........ County':................Q �''.....�..............
Land Owner Name: .YT.epld... !41?_Q�Gt .. ...............
.-. Phone No: q/::.:........... 43s�Y' ._...
FacilityConctact: .................................................................................. Title: ............. .............. Phone No:..................... A - ..........................................................
S` �PFI -,SivDW i rH� /g ✓
hiailinh Address:.... ..... :. .....�P/� �!� c4 d..'..4 .N�� ........ ..... r' _r�.. .. . .... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ................................................................................. Integrator:
Certified Operator: ................................................. .............................................. ..... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
. .4.5:. �:... ..."��.... ....... . . .�f�:..... �.......�z...;d_e•r..?.....1'_.:�:�......�`.�.%/....:�.....r.... .11R/.1/....�d!`R...1�:.. ...!�.�.t'h....... 4
4t� IQ.OTC..............................s4. ...'1!�......................................................................................................................................................................................
...
Latitude Longitude
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
' Desgn Current _ Destgn# Current Y ©estgn Curr nt
� Ca aci P.o ul'ation Poultry': .•:Ca'aci '•Po ulat.., Cattle Ca acftVPo elation
❑Wean to Feeder ;10 La er JE1 Dahy 1 1107-
16 U
El Feeder to Finish ❑Non-Layer ❑Non Day
Farrow to Wean §� x � :. �,•'," �r
Farrow to Feeder Tota! DestgnEa R
paClty Q
JEJ Farrow to Finish { SSL 'V� a
.. ..._.... _._..
T"' � X �
❑Other ,
'<L K. X ---.`,qS'.E _«>o-,r
a
e
"'+ -'�' M _-mR` ,.._.._ _ -.,...:. ,. _._.
.Number of L agoons Y Holdang Piin ❑Subsurface Drams Present x
f
❑
aLagoon Ar ea ' pray Field Are p�
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes B-N-0
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes �o
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Watee?(If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? es ❑No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds) require es ❑No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

Facility Number- .21......—...1 ...
6. Is facility not in compliance with any 101cable setback criteria in effect at the time of fign? es No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? es ❑No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? NIL- ❑ Yes ❑No
Structure. I ug on. and/or Holdi a Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No
Freeboard(ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes ❑No
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes ❑No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes ❑No
Waste Application
I4. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes 0-1 o
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........ C v. ..}....1� !L'�✓ ..r�f1£� r. .....................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑ Yes 310
r
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ��Q dt.[t+e� ❑Yes a-9
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes EI-110
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes 9-No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑No
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes
For Certified Facilities Only /l//'?
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? w6s No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑NO
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes ❑lVo--
Coriiments;(refer to question#) Explain'any YES answers'and/or any redommendatiohi-'or Any.,other coTi me' ts' A,
Use drawings of facziity to better,explain situations ,(use addittor al pages as necessary)
Y
a
Reviewer/Inspector Nam TE
ReAewer/Inspector Signature: Date: — 6
cc: Division of Water Quality, ater Quath),Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

• Facility Number: .9.1......— of Inspection: 2 7 — •
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Yl AAI
v �
a
4/30/97

_W
C]DSWC Ani Feedlot Operation Review
®DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection r
Routine 0 Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p o ow-up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 9:50 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ® Registered p Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min))Spent on Review 0
p Certified p Permitted or Inspection-(includes travel and processing)
p Not OperationalDate Last Operated:
Farm Name: Triple W Farms County: Alamaimp...........................................W.SRO...-....
OwnerName: Harold................................... Wondy......................................................... Phone No: 3.76 0.59...................................................................
Facility Contact: Ha.rold..W..oady...............................................Title: Owner................................................ Phone No: 9.1ft-,M.6--63,59.......................
Mailing Address: 1a45-E.Gx.ccusbotua.Rd.................................................................... Snorx.Camp...NC.................................................. 27a49..............
OnsiteRepresentative: Narold.H.'nod. .......................................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
sflut mi es..W. .aia .. xxazt.-..turns k.-.. .tui es.to..atrm.mraszg t.............................................................................................. a�
...................................:.......:...... ......... ...:...:........................................... ..................................................................................................
::::::::::...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................€
::I
Latitude ©•®� ©°� Longitude ®• ®� ®�°
Type of Operation , Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ ayer I I JIM Dairy
p Feeder to P mts ❑ Non-Layer I I JE3 on- airy
❑ Farrow to can
❑ Farrow to Feeder Total Design Capacity 250
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total SSLW 350,
,❑Other
FNumber of Lagoons/Holding Ponds © u sur ace Drains Present p agoonArea ® pray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes p No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water?(If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds)require ® Yes 0 No
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97

Facility Number: 01_10
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? © Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? M Yes ❑No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes M No
Structures(Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is storage capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [3 No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [:INo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes,and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? [] Yes ❑No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? [] Yes ®No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......................Fesme..............................CaM..(Silap_&..Gxain).......Small.CrJaitz.(Wheal,.Barley..............................................................
Milo ats)
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management an (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes M No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? [] Yes M No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ® Yes ❑No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
For Certified Facilities OnIY
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? [3 Yes [3 No
Comments(refer to question#): Explain..any YES anmwrs and/or any recommendations°or,any other comments..
Use drowings of facility twbetter explain situatioria (use`additional'pageg:as necessary)
3. Visited on complaint previously. .I
5. Maintenance has improved since previous inspection. Some areas where work had been done need to have grass sown.
7. Taking certification class/test in August 1997.
20. Work requested to make sure any runoff contained. Once completed a follow-up will be made.
23. A certified AWMP has not been received. Mr. Woody will he below the threshold by Jan. 1, 1998.
24. No records kept at present time.
** Facility has a tank for parlor water.
** Contacted Harold Woody prior to visit on 6-24-97.
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1r,I57I5hnst0n- �. - ._ . m— _-
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:

Kp
. "szS'.A2y�v`�"tw�fi=�.' ' A-, k �7�c.�
M 1� ODS An><mal Feedlot O eratioa'4Revlew ;{ k �
x � ? ss P r e ear r 5--
z �n �tf '." '� --rn•a`� g fir'£ .
■ ,, -�' ,h
4{ WQ A a1 Feedlot OpelrationSiteanspectloa
Routine -O Corn laint -O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up ofDSWC review O Other
' Date of Inspection
Facility Number' !
Time of Inspection 's 24 hr. (hh:mm)
..,.,` Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: tl 4;0stered ❑Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min))Spent on Review 77
❑Certified ❑Permitted or Inspection includes travel and processing)
❑Not Operational Date Last Operated: ........._ .... __...._ .... _..:...................__,.. ......_................
Farm Name: ....t/.�r �.........�...._...FO-Q..i!.tj .... County:........../�an?�..`'�.L�............._WS'e.la
Land Owner Name:.._._...f�Lkep/lld... _...... t¢ ....... _ Phone No: q�o 7G J .3.5y
Facility Conctact:._._. .. -........ .... ....................:............._ .. /. Title: ........ Phone No:
Mailine Address: _ r�- :. ... 1¢��N,�. ,eQa?..� 1Q�fy« _ . �" '! ..__ . .T .. ......._......._......
Onsite Representative: .....`_....._......_..... -,..... --•-----. ....-_-- ... Integrator:
Certified Operator:....._........................................... .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
.!W..kd.)e..............-............. ?. .._ '. ..................................................................-............................................................................................
.......... ......... �y
Latitude Longitude7•
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
RIES
„�Des�gn�Ctir ert D es gnu Cu ent Design Curren[
'" Swine po ulation 'o!�� rY�= Ca actri ;Po cation Cattle Ca ttv•'Po uiii A
Ca aci
ElWean to Feeder ❑La erg ❑Dadryrp U
❑Feeder to Finish ❑Non-La er ❑Non DatEZ
El Farrow to Wean r `
Farrow to Feederij
Tbti De�stgn�ap c fY
r
FR Farrow to Finish fi
µ_ w __.....W._ _._.. . ota[ SSLW
❑Other
Number ofLagoons l Harng,Ponds mow,❑Subsurface Drains Present
W.
m=om ❑Lagoon Area pray Field Area.,.A ..
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes B-Tqo—
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑Spray field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed,was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes [r}-i?o
b. If discharge is observed,did it reach Surface Water? (If yes,notify DWQ) ❑ Yes
c. If discharge is observed,what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?(If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes E1
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? es ❑No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes
5. Does any part of the waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds)require es ❑No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

Facility Number: 01L._—..2_
---:6.-ts facility not in compliance with any icable setback criteria in effect at the time osign? No
T'Did the facility_fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? Ries ❑No
8.'.Are there lako66s"or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? el - ❑ Yes ❑No
Structu, es^ Jag on and/ r ioidin Pond. �/�,�
9. Is storage'capacity(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Yes ❑No
Freeboard(ft): - Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑Yes ❑No
11. Is erosion,or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes ❑No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ❑No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat; notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑Yes ❑No
Waste Application
I4. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑Yes 0-55
(If in excess of WMP,or runoff entering waters of the State,notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
... ....l�d.. .r.. 1..... ................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan(AWMP)? ❑Yes B'No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �o
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes 9-Ko�
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes e-�No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ElYes B_Igo
r Certified Facilities Only A1114�-
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? �sff No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑Yes ❑Iio
;Comments(refer to queston# Exp�ain anyYES�answe�and/or any recommendations_or any ocher comments : itw
%
Use drawings of fahcthty to better-explain situations (use additional,pages as necessary}
M
M-1 PH
a
Reviewer/Inspector Name Z_ MEMO
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: — !
ec: Division of Water Quality, ater Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Facility lYumber., ate of Inspection: Cam- 7 r 4
..Y> , `sea..:. 4,
t14Ulhonal Gomment5 and/or Drawings as ' E ;„:a's" r.
�k wk G -ay Q
4/30/97

r - 415R0 Q.�2ie2 j
JLlL-14-1995 15:34 FROMDE1I.TER EaLIFiL I TY SECT I Ohl TO .
Site Requires Itntuediate Attention:
Facility
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT No.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: C , 1995
Farm NamV0wner. Li.',
Mailing Address: S~ ' /cl Sr Z 7;y f
IatMg W=.. Phone:
On Site Representative: Z3,laLCJ Phone: -3 7
Physical AddresW-,,cation•
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattlt
Design Capacity: -30 C� Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Cc-tif cation Number: ACNEW-
L Ld ude:jj.S--"- ,-�-q ' ! S' " Longitude: 5 'lL --_t_" Elevation:_.r.�__west
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient fizeboard of I Foot+25 year 24 hour stony event
(approximately I Foot+7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: _fit. Inches-�,
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Qv*(s) being utilized: r " 3 S ls
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 260 Fen from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Trine? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters'of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,or other
timil,ar man-made devices? Yes cir No If Yes,Please.Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management reowds (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specificciacnage with cover crop)? Yes or No _
Additional Comments:
lam'
l
N tore
Cc:Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

' OPERATIONS BRANCH UJQ Ear: 919- 15-6i)4� Ju 1 24 '95 10 P. 11i 10
fSiLc.R��cx lsnmtdiarc Attsntian
2=4a4y Number.' w..,..
SITE VM1TA'110N RFCOM
DATE: 7„� 1995 r
Owner. _17--if r / mod' —., Name Name:
Agent visiting Sits: _ 12if Phone: Z z-!-v
MOM
On She Repragentaclva: 7 i�/{ !„ Photo.--_
NLy31cal Address:
e,/ �7_73 el5F
Mailing Add1,=:_
Typo of op=4va. Stirinc Poultry Ca Qc
DcSigR Cf,Apneiiy, _ 1 .�_ Number of AniaialR ari Site: yG
Lsititude. D "` I,' 5_.� 1 QIIg1:pdC; _ p
Tpe of IziEpccdon: C3ruund X Acrial
Circla Yes of No
DOGS thr.A]►iwal W"t4 Lagoon ha"au T_icicnt frae`3aerd of I Foot+25 ye n'24 hoar storm evrut
(approxi.nratEcly 1 Foot-.7 inc..`uo�9 Qr No Actual I"rocba:rd' T'ec1 J.1na'&;
r'or facilities wkh taoro tin or&1:42ntri, pipe address the c.dicrlarooas' Cr=buArd under the
c��ruuc,�[S sccCipn.
Wits any seep $r Ol)Seri'c 1 Yev or(v�Va.'3 ��iCt3 cI09lUn oPtl-e �f?ft1?: zC�i Qf G�
Is sdxqua[c 14n&4vanab.e for:sr:d q4�: Icuin}n 5oi N Is the a)vcr crop adcgnat: r No
I '+-ate%/ r��-..-•.� �-, r.--- �� `�� -- ���.�.cL7 `�
Faa to [phone] Si 'ure of Agart