The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About710074_Inspection_20181107 Psi"..��.� ,�'�1• _t _ x� u.,c - "r: _ .� `�,`�. .^ Fa �,., _ - ¢��.e, Wa_ter R,.ources,C-��` �,., - - : a t � Tuiriber_.� 7/ 7t;4 " °y" Q Division of Soil9and'Water_Conseirvation'-. - '<r"r' �,, �,�".q.. �°��'• .. = yT _J 6� "��,':t:��-�,. .„'� A.O Ot6er�Agencyao:,>�:. :�' `-�_ ':�'� •,�.:,�, zs_ �: - �t Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection Operation Review tructure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0*follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: /- % Arrival Time: r Departure Time: L7 County: Region: Farm Name: "t5i" Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: n Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: (J �n ui`rh�,,,, I jwx o rii Integrator• Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: besi iN r Current', aa Cnr ent-^_ 'k-='�ySs- §. 'a'_^,' _ - - `=r° '`'- a Yr,;s:'-' i_ _ � e'Z;t.,,. b -- ao' _ 1�VetPoult' Ca aci Po' �.". ..� , � � _ a , SwlneY ,. Caliacity9; attle.,.L- �'=e P t3 .P_•. Ca aci}��7 t'o " -° .'-- _ ✓, ___„�,$�`', __ - %e'_1°�- --- _ _ate�__ - - ,3�,'., #_f r .sfr".- _ 'rr.,"'�'"-p; _:.'_e��' -z �". _ F�ean Finish La er = DairyCow "� Feeder ' Non-La er _' Da' Calfo Finish8 Da' Heifer _a Farrow to Wean a '"`; =aF°`Deli n'¢eCurrerif. D Cow ° ga Farrow to Feeder I) ;`Foul_ dsCa'aei' a po '` _- Non-Dai =' Farrow to Finish ILayers Beef Stocker Gilts Non-La ers Beef Feeder Boars jPullets Beef Brood Cow Turkeys -- `_ 4 �Ofher Turkey Pouets Other Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �j No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes 777❑�� No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: T Z Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): ` 3 3 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [�] No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes `7W No ❑ NA 0 NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): 13.Soil Type(s): 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [V)NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA W NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [)o NE the appropriate box. ❑WLTP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA P,NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [�j NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA P NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facifi Number: / - 744 Date of—inspection: / —7- 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE 0. 25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 5fl NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 14 NE 27.Did'the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [)o NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [—] No ❑ NA NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [ .NE ❑Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes EA No ❑ NA ❑ NE Commep4g(refer to question#f):Explli*any YES answers and/or any additional_reeommendations,or any othertomments. Use drarvin'gs of facility;eo better explain situations(use additional°'pages as necessar),). 6F OF /V,,w 3q Id �6 �- 39 - q 3� Reviewer/Inspector Name: ,' _�c� Phone: ,tll-7� Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Page 3 of 3 21412015