710056_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA �
Department of Environmental Qua!

Type of Visit (Y,C,00mpliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit t'7 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Time: $ 3 Departure Time: County:Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Oasite Representative: Ca-pa-r-! Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = g = Longitude: = ° = 1
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean i a L-.l 9 LoL)
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifej
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes `;/o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: `� _ (� Date of Inspection `! a
Waste Collection & Treatment
No
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
[I Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier': T�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): I S Lo
Observed Freeboard (in): y C1 L g
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
El Yes
,/
E o
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
U<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes
[No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
Eli 10
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
E2No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C,WS C..-r-0 0
13. Soil type(s) _ Go A N op. L _
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? El Yes
�,/'
EZ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
[i//NNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[] Yes
[ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
51"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
tAQN� &OD ?_Eco(t_LZ3 l_.'ooIL Cc�:.j>,
11
Reviewer/inspector Name (_ :_ 0 Phone: (ql0) '1G6 _ -7IL S
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
I2128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspectionit
S 9 oS
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
❑ Yes 0� o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes o El NA El NE
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
ElYes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
IQNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
E NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Q NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
<o
El NA
ElNE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
ElE No
A
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
El Yes
,�,�
L7No ❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
!J iNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
/
B o ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
Eio ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N6 ElNA
ElNE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ElYes
��OElE NA
❑ NE
4
AdditsonaE Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104
12128104

Type of Visit 0 Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit:
(A Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conndiitiionnally Cerrt%tified 13Registered
Farm Name: ..... ZI)% C .."! ...
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
R] Tune: q
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County: Al��;
Phone No:
Facility Contact: Title:.__ . _ .. _ _._ ..__ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: _11,6-Mao t/ kvro� _ Integrator... b
Certified Operator: _ .. _W ..... . __„ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Home Latitude • 4 <' Longitude ' 44
ea CYi . 4YL��.
Swine: Po flog. :Yotiltiy':e
Po on.` , C�ittle 'Po ton
Wean to Feeder Layer
"R
Feeder to Finish x Non -Layer L
Non -Dairy
Farrow to WeanOther
Farrow to Feeder
=�
Farrow to Finish frt
Total Design 2 aMGilts n
r
Boars
- Total SSi.W^
jtiiYiLLigWlil f:
32
..Z.' Sx
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b_ If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway _
5 cture I ;pcture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
12112103
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes J0 No
❑ Yes RINo
❑ Yes 11No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: q7, - 5(p
Date of Inspection // D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancefunprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancerimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste_ Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelrmprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Po rding ❑ PXN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
❑ Yes P`No
❑ Yes 0 No
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Po
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 0 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes JZ No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes ;n No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
[:]Yes ;a No
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
r"T V�PUZ:-prneo-r �390Kam Dac:o Ap�aca � �� � ��
Apo-ro-ea— S�p�" M��t'Ntf M. to&oF-A LJ� cCO� f�-T -G T�
of"R'PW'F NOU1 `�-- 11l'l� t tOer- S 0EePS i Del Elm 1T �eQ�1DF7�
P�rJ P l'U' W25L4- -06"r f-4-0' J ZJ-ro Lf�C-Ot]►Js
R./) (Jfi] c P�lfl-� a ��(}} 'V- r? ,w� ll �f
-,bF 4 fL t-{ E{� TU MpZ �'- ©V F� 1vF 01-y atltVf-
j5YPrCt _O 7E
V)A4e,
Reviewer/inspector Name
ReviewerAkwpector Signature:
Date: //
12112103 Gomruea

Facility Number: / L6k7j Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes JgNo
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?.
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes P No
23_ Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VrNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes [a No
27. Did Reviewer/Impector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes U(No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes R No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes VNo
N`PDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, slip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes ONo
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
/V49F . /Quv►�C- L� i
-- AA �Wb�O t-,-S-r 01-C-4T.
12112103

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 5 Date of Visit: Time:rO i
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: W0-`�C7� �ML1rr __ i �D __ __ _ _ _ _ _ County:
Owner Name:-"�f"� q Phone No C! i d s ��� .a
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Swine []Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
" .• lle ign
Swine Ca aci
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Cure n D gR Current Design Current
P,o uI 'on Poultry Ca acity P,o ulation. Cattle Ca acity P,o ulation
10 Dai
❑Non -La er ❑ Non-Dai
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑Other
Total Desigq Capacity
Total SSLW
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem
❑ S ray Field Area
DischarEes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste C2llection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: h
Freeboard (inches): � ft -3
�.
05/03101 _ b ;1,1I
n CIA_,C .��p y
❑ Yes L-_T<
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
Now
❑ Yes
,❑ L
�,'No
El Yes
2hgo,
es ❑ No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10_ Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility tack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Ree uired R2cords &.Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ieI WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ieI irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ieI discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
es ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
or� en (refer to,4uesti on #� Exolarn;any YES,answers and/or.any, recommendattons or any other=comments i -
-t �.> _
Use drawmgsaof faciht} to better$ezplaen situations`' use additional pages as necessary) ❑ Field Copy Final Notes
k
.
a�oa,z c
a n c r� � -I- :Y.. I Y) �� �
-!� 1
b*, L u -+ o* vvr o W
►.�pal
Reviewer/Inspector Name !
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 �� Continued

Type of Visit @) Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ORoutine OComplaint OFollow up 0 Emergency Notification @)Other 0 Denied Access
F1500
—
Date of Visit: Time: —Facility Number I -- [UNot -Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name; WWh#,JFArmK-6 ................................................................ ... County: I!jmdtr ................................... MUQ ......
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address: Ufi..Gikr1=d.King.RaaA .................................................................. Tead=.NC ............................. I ............................. 28.464 ..............
Facility Contact: ........................................................... Title: Phone No: ......................................
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Vlw.mt .. C .......................... Ijbig ................................................... Operator Certification Number: 1637,6.. ........
Location of Farm:
Southeast of Willard. Take exit 390 from 140, turn left. Go 0.3 mile turn left on SR 1314. Go 1.3 miles, turn left on SR 1313. A.
Farm is 0.5 mile on left
J@Swine E]Poultry F Horse Latitude ------
] Cattle 0 34 •F 40 Longitude 1 77
.......... ........................ r"r....' .... .. .................. ........... ......... ......... .......... ........Iles....
�Pboi
Capacity: Po iilati6i r :i:
Capacity--- ............
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
1248
E] Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
D Gilts
Boars
.............................. ....................
`4
Subsurface Drains Present
No Liquid Waste
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon [I Spray Field E] Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
Lagoon Area JLJ Spray Field Area
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoonsystem? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
0 Yes 0 No
El Yes El No
F1 Yes [:]No
[-]Yes []No
[)Yes (:]No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes El No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [I Spillway ❑ Yes E:) No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........................... .......................... .......................... ........................... ........................... ...........................
Freeboard (inches): .............. . . .............................." -

V� Vw Vl
a..v.swswca.
l
Facility Number: 71-56 Date of Inspection 0416-2003
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
I I - Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
© No
Repuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.

f 11
(Type of Visit (A Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit d Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of visit:
Permitted C1 C��erttified0 C�nnditionally /Ceertifiied [3 Registered
Farm Name: — l��ff# 7
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Date Last Operated Above Threshold: _
County:. %�,
Phone No:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
1
Onsite Representative: J�O� G/t%(i _ Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
U(Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0a 0L 0" Longitude 0a 06
Wean to Feeder
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Gilts
Boars
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;� No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes X No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
S�ucture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 'g°A�T
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued

r b
Facility Number: — (( Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
G(No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
XNo
11. Is there evidence o over applicati n? ElExcessi Ponding [I PAN ❑ Hydraulic�erfload
�
El Yes
XNO
12. Crop type E 5 S D�79
B. Do the receiving crops d' er with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
PNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ONo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
fig No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
RrNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
VNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
�No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
El Yes
XNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
X/11JO
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
ElYes
No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
�dNo
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
I No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments refer to quisfibn E lain as YES answers arfd/otdny recommendstions`or any.other cc�mmeuts. " 3
Use drawings of facility to Netter explain situations. (use addihonal pages as necessary)
-: , Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
T ��C�C �io �ZTi`F uJr✓!�2
Qaa�..
���J
I WffIP [/VRZ—r��'PAP
,� ,�
��A'd
L r� �}RO FJ�
'cvp�5 F�,�� 7v Lo c�-r�
tiJr s Ir r#r Crow oiz hl,�
t2C Qazrzcu �v��J�SI
i'r2Att1J. y
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: Q
A v rr
O5103101 �/' Continued

i
Facility Number: Date of inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge aVor below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
ANo
28,
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
XNO
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
)No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (Le, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
ElYeso
%No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Y�
05103101

i
Quality
vision of Water
Iitvrsion of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
.4�c.-.'*.s.
Type of Visit Xclompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit XRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: Time: 1S Printed on: 7/21/2000
,tD
0 Not
�/ Operational 0 Below Threshold
[Permitted ❑ Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
Farm Name: ............. � S—c l"!........ County:... " . '.............................
............ ........... _
OwnerName: ............................................................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:........................................................ Phone No
Mailing Address: .... ..........................................
Onsite Representative:,.�....................................................... . Integrator:......
Certified Operator : ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
A,
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• �� ���
Design Current
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
a
,
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
-'0 Boars
Design Current-. Desig", Cnrirat
.Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca.ci.- . Po` eilatio
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total Sg
(❑ Subsurface Drains PresentI.ag•Mn Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System f:
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
St�ruu`� urre I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .................................... .N.g/2 .............
Freeboard (inches): �� qb
5100
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �Mo
❑ Yes �TNo
❑ Yes �(No
Structure 6
Continued on back

r
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes tR No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes kfNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes KNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9No
it- Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes PfNo
12. Crop type Lil SG )4
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ONo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes *0
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No.
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes KNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes JjNo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes k No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes �tNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes VNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes MNo
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes. XNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 19f No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes gNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes P&No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes DRo
Rio viOfatiOijs:ee def c1e0eie5 4ere noted ditriiig fhisAsit; -You J t�ecgiye 06 furt�trtr
....
roues ' deuce: about this visit
'•- . -,m.�:. air --a--".• rs
�mmets (refer to qon #) Eupiaun any�swaarVr any t�ecommefac► arany flier,
Use•d�rawags of fatty to better `eicplain srtuations. (ttseWaddi�onal pages asecessar')o
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Impector Signature: Date: _Q 5190

y
1
i Facility Number: i)ate of inspection qq ( Printed on,• 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below I<Yes KNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? / \`
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes XNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ,�j No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes XNo
d t,on - Comments and/orDrawings: { -
[ll
5100
J

Facility Number Date. of Visit: rime: i? 3' p Printed on: 10/26/2000
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified O Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
Farm Name: L F t' V" J: y:...0 e e f
..... Count ......................................................................
OwnerName: .......... ..{ ti '' .............................................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: .........
Mailing Address:.........
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:...._.
Location of Farm:
................................................................... Title:.........................
c(..
B ef..k................................................................
Phone No:
Integrator: nr....... ..Rr�.x..........
Operator Certification Number: .........................
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude ' 4 i4 Longitude 0 • 6 64
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JE1 Non -Layer JE1 Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons Z ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste :Management System
Dischames & Stream I, maacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made`? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes -ig:No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes JR'No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ErNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes JRNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1
Structure 2 Structure 3
Idend Fier: .......... N Gl^!....................101..01....................I.....................
Freeboard (inches): 733
37
5100
❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ;9No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Npmber: —SLI Date of Inspection /Z Printed on: 10/26/2000
5. 'Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes %No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,� No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancetimprovement?
❑ Yes
%No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
H. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
$No
12. Crop type arm ��er�� Sd b�ahS 2
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
JdNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
:VNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
P No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
79No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
X No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Oyes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
�dNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
�K No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
discharge,
❑ Yes
No
(ie/ freeboard problems, over application)
;f�
23. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0 No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
;KNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
`dNo
a Violatidiis'ot- &flclenCics •Wer£ noted diWkid this,vls.it. - Y:oii witl-teceiye do further
orr� s o deice: about this visit.
Comments.(refer. to 4uestion #): Explain any YES answers and/or any -recommendations or any other comments =~ _ -•
_
Use drawings of facility to better explain.situations. (use additional pages asmkessary)
19. tJeeo( ZQoD Bpi 1 4eS4 in reLot,d1, Nee,4 4n �41Ve
Av%ejj .i jI owc,, b �. Ne_ed pNj4 and vtAgge,4
wc%00 IN,, his delteA In1;4a;, 64 4riys o�
dr► ��� zQQ- 2 Fo�1 VW% r: vlee4 4,9 sec svY,,•titE✓ I��al trr� �1 ioh
reeb Ord recarAS I LI VkA svv+�r•,2r 1 �g i,�����t-�Yowi recarcGs -1zb wte
! zl t a ,7a. �►
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: d Q 5lDO

Facility Number: Date of Inspection Z /J Printer! on: 10/26/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below KrYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes )9 No
29. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, [:]Yes ONo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ONo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) []Yes CKNO
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes RNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged till pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 99 Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments 'and/or Drawtn ...
_ -
Tkms+i y�4 +-efetir ee.k 6i.-FIGxin-j�►skc A,
5100

of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine OO Complaint O Eollow up O Emergency !Notification 'O Other ❑ Deniers Access
Date of Visit: 2-16-2000 .Time: 1400
Facility Number 71 56
O Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified C] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold_
Farm Name: W...athan.Faxm.Kfi......................................................................................I... County: Pender.................... :............... 3N 0......
OwnerName: .Cxaiz----------------------------- Ki�---------•-----------------•----------------- Phone No: 9.J_Q-,Z8.5_:1fi22 --------------------------------------------
Facility Contact- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Title:..- -- -- - -- - -- - - - - - - Phone No - -- - - - - -
Mailing Address:.1.Z.fi.Gar==d.Kiug.R9ad.................................................................. ::Jl:eachgy.Nc........................................................... 28.46.4 ..............
Onsite Representative: JUM4 Crig.-----•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•-----•--•--•--....--•--•--•-- Integrator: KiagxAum ..............................................
Certified Operator: TracitL__ Parker__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Operator Certification Number: .11253
Location of Farm:
southeast of Willard. Take exit 390 from I40, turn left. Go 0.3 mile turn left on SR,•1314. Go 1.3 miles, turn left on SR 1313.
Farm is 0.5 mile on left. r
® Swine [I Poultry [I Cattle ❑Horse Latitude I 34 • Longitude i 77 S7 40
Design Current .Design Current Des�gt! Current
v
lit. eon:.:....ouItry Ca acit . Po ulatidn` ... Gatfle Ca ace .:Pa ulat�on::..
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
1248
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Firush
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer❑Dairy
Al
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
:...:: ::.. ...... :::.. ...... ..:: :.... - .:.: _ ::..: .... t
�] Other
Tafal D
�i �t3' 1,248
.W 540,384
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance,inan-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State -(If yes; notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes © No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes ❑ No
.1 ,.
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State otherthanfrom a discharge? ❑ Yes []No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........ _.71eu .......... _.. -•. -.. _ olii-..... _............. . . . . . . .... ... _.. _.. _....::.. _.: _ ... _.. _.. - - . _.. _..... _.. . _.. _..... _..... _..... _.. _
Freeboard (inches): _..- -- --fl-- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -25

YOU uonnnuea on DacK
. Facility Number. 71-56 Date of Inspection 2-16-2000°-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees; severe erosion, ❑Yes ❑ No
seepage,<etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) .
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑Yes ©No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ' «' ® Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?,-.❑ Yes R No
24. Does facility -require a follow-up visit by same agency? ..V L ❑ Yes ❑ No
251. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AV MW? ❑ Yes ❑ No
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit. "
iss Colby responded to complaint about waste in stream by their house. Mr. Colby traced waste back to area adjacent to the farm. He
ntacted me (Dean Hunkele) and I net him. We proceeded to farm and discovered waste ponded between houses and lagoon, field to west
lagoon, and evidence in nearby ditches. Samples were taken at several locations including area within a few feet of stream (name
known at this time). Most likely an un-named trib of Williams Creek?
King states that flush tank overflowed due to faulty float. He was notified by an employee (Billy Wood) approx. 730-800 on
g. Mr. King states he did not investigate potential amount lost or path.
ReviewerllnspectorNsme HugkeklC�►lby .....

ErLCVECwenIuNPCcurra11guxiure: _ Lase: 5/UU
Facility Number: 71-56 Date of Inspection 2-16-2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes C]No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 0 Yes © No
29, is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i_e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, []Yes © No
roads, building structure, and/or public property}
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes d No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ©No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? Q Yes © No
* Investigation will continue. Grower is instructed to fax DWQ IRR-1, I-RR-2 records, weekly freeboard records, waste plan (field list) +
and map to DWQ by noon on Thursday, Feb. 17th, 2000. He is also instructed to take a new set of waste samples for these lagoons. He
has been combining from both into one. Keep track of lagoon that irrigation is taking place from and use appropriate PAN.
No known call by this inspecter from Mr. King about this problem -will verify at office.

of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation ;
for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 71 56 Date of Visit. 2-16-2000 1'IIne: 1400
m �o,10 Not Operational Below Threshold
Permitted Certified 13 Conditionally Certified E3Registered Date iastOperated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: .W.Atbs.Fairpx.K.6......................................................................................... . County: Pe adcr.........._.._....._.._.._....._.._. 3�4JR ......
.
Owner Name: Cxyip ............................. King-.--•--------------------•--------•----------- Phone No: 97A -2a- 02----------------
Facility Contact- - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Title:. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - Phone No:
MailingAddress: 1.?.ff.Gran'.lamd.KinX.R4ad.................................................................. :Fea,Glue.NC............................................................ 28.46.4 ..............
Onsite Representative: d aft.Ding.__•--•-_.__.__...._............................•........... Integrator: kraig-Farmas.............................................
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Southeast of Willard. Take exit 390 from 140, turn left- Go 03 mile turn left on SR 1314. Go 1.3 miles, turn left on SR 1313. 16
Farm is OS mile on left. w
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
::: Dea n Cur3r
Ponula
Latitude 1 34 " 40 21 :u Longitude 77 • 57� _40� u
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
1248
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts ; ..
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?, ; ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes,.notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? .
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ©No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any Part of the operation?
_a.,i. N Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment - -
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillways. _ ❑ Yes []No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ' .. _.. _.. _. ncx� _.. _.. _... _.. _.. _.. _A3si......... _. .... _..... _.. _.. _. .... _.. _:. ;.. _ • ....-• --- .................. .... _.. _.. _..... _.. _..... _
Freeboard (inches): - - - 3fl-- - - - -- -2�- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -= - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - --

... . Designurtent Design :current
....
Poult Cattle
::Po ulat�on
ry.'.'"°:`::Capac�#y..:Popula#inti
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection OO Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation -
Reason for VisitO Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification ,Q O- ther El Denied Access
,
Date of Visit: 5-24-2000
NumberTune:[::�cility
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted 12 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified U Registered Date Last Operated.or Above Threshold_
Farm Name: W.Atha.Pauan.K-G......................... ...... County: .......................... W-M ......
Owner Name: Crai ----•- Kwg•--.......-----•---- 91Q'.�85=2 1.--•--.._..............
g•--•--•--•--•--•--•--._ ......_._..........._-•-- Phone No: - ...-•--•--•........
•
Facility Contact- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ------ -- - - - - - Title: -- - -- -- - - - - -- -- - -- - - - Phone No: - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Mailing Address: Ufi,Gar]and. .lu&&..................:............................................... Tea.cba.riC........................................................... 28.46.4 ..............
Onsite Representative: CxgLjpjjjuX............................................................. Integrator: King.Fa=....... .......................................
Certified Operator: Tracin L__ __ __ __ __ __ __ Paler.. _.._ _. . __ _. Operator Certification Number: 32253
Location of Farm: ri
Southeast of Willard. Take exit 390 from I40, turn left. Go 0.3 mile turn left on SK.1314. Go 1.3 miles, turn left on SR 1313.
Farm is 0.5 mile on left. -
®Swine ❑ Poultry [:]Cattle ❑Horse Latitude I 34 • 4Q ?� 21�� K Longitude 77 • 57 _' -40
- Design Current
':Swine ................ :: C z acit :' :Po uiation.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
1248
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Dischar¢es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? f�:.. _ ❑ Yes (] No
..p
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Ifyes'.notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in, gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQT : ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ONO
Waste Collection & Treatment
•elf.,•, _.
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑Yes No
�:•
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .. ...... ... ... ... ...... _... _........... _.. _.. _.......... _.. _.. _.. _........ _.. _.. . _........... _.. _.. _.. _......:: _.. =.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. . _.. _.. _..... _.. _.. _.. _.. _
Freeboard (inches): -- -- -- --40-- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -3 2,- -- - - - - - -- -- -- - - - -- - -- -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation.'
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 71 56 Date of Visit: 12I6120oo Time:,
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified J3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: . .... .. .. .. ..
Farm Name: W.Atha,Farm.K-6 ......................... County: Pt:adcr.................................... WJ1R0......
Owner Name: C1CRi1*............................. ------------------------------------------- - -- one o: - ...-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -
Facility Contact- - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- - - - -- - -- -. Title: -- -- - -- - -- -- -- - - -- -- - Phone No: - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Mailing Address:.1.21i..Garland.Ki=.RuaA.................................................................. TeacIiiY'NC........................... . ............... I............... 28.46.4 ..............
d
Onsite Representative: Buft.Kjng ............................................................ Integratoi:'K►M9xA=............ •.................................
Certified Operator- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ----- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Operator'Certification Number: - -- -.._ ._ -- -- -- -- --
Location of Farm:
Southeast of Willard. Take exit 390 from I40, turn lent. Go 0.3 mile turn left oh SR 1314. Go 1.3 miles, turn left on SR 1313. +
Farm is 0.5 mile on left-
0 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3 34 - 40 €� - 21 i� . ' Longitude i 77 57 40 K
:.
Dsstgr� Current Design Current Design Current
5wiune,. ..:. :Ca" aei €€Po uiateon :....Poultry. Capacity...PopulatioiE _ Cattle :Capacrty:;Populahon
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
1248
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts - �- r.,r•::. '
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? •r• }= ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/*?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ^
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes M No
n/a
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway , - ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4. Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .. - .I�TeKc _.. . .... ....... .mod - - - - .. _.... - ... _..... _.. _. :... _.. _.. _..... _.. _.
Freeboard (inches): -- -- -- --�3 -- - - - - -- -. T- -- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- - -- - ---- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- - -- - --

ini►f Satl and,Waterm:Conserve'.
w of;Sod anil Wate' Conseeva
0--Routine Complaint
Facility Number
of DWO i
0(permitted 13 Cer
tified [] Conditionally Certified
Farm Name: .....CTi�
Owner Name:
!ction 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date or Inspection L.a=j�-6'�'O
Time of Inspection ��24 hr. (hh:nun)
C] Registered [] Not Operational Date Last Operated:
....... County:................t-.. ..
Facility Contact: ........ Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: ................ . ................................................................ I................... ........................... ................. ........................... .... ..... .... [
Onsite Representative:.. ....... ........... ... Integrator: ,` ..........
............................ ................... s...
Certified Operator:....
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude • & « Longitude ' ' 64
Design"'Cui•'rent- Design
gn Current Design CuiTenf
Swine = Ca aci Population Poultry Ca achy Po ulation '° Cattle Ga act Po`ulation .
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer = . ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 1E] Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
- ` ❑Other
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capactty<.,
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Tot2k1;-SSLW
Number of Lagoons �- ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ©Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area -
Holding Ponds / Solid Trapis
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon [I Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: V%Q-V 1 Ou
Freeboard (inches): ..........�0 ...................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Faculty Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid Ievel
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type uj
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
[]No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
XYes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
XNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
�: Nb •yiolations:or di l iciencib� •W(eria note(• dutFng #leis:visit: - Yoii :will•reeeiye trio fui-th' ;
corres orideince: a�aut this Visit. • • ....... ...... ..... • . • • •
Comments (referato-ques4r�n #) :Explain anyv- S answers and/©many recommendations oir any other, ebtiiinents:`
Usedrawings of faciitty Eabetter-explain situaiions (use acTditional_pages as necessary} r
�. -
_ M
-
Ross CA Yes 4z� � � - �� - kC-1
t-j l +-�' � t Z.a, GkvP a, t tt„ r., �ie�l-v �•-�-es2.T
Reviewer/Inspector Name Fa.I'Al
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
.�-.
Date: �Z_
3/23/99

{
FactGty Number: —
Odor Issues
Date of Inspection G Q
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
_._ _. itiona ,. omments an or-' .raw!ings: q .
_.
wie
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
3/23/99

[3 Division of Soil avid Water, Conservation bperation;Review
`� vision of Soil and Water Conservation Compliance Inspection r°
_ sion of Water ali Coin Nance Ins ection
- . � _ Q!i ty P . P _ r _
13Other Agency .Operation -Review }
.
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ©Q 124 hr. (hh:mm)
11S(PermittedXCertified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered E3 Not O erational Date Last Operated: -7
Vva+� a,- F—_ r-Y, K- 6 Count �t�hIdw W;..f20...
FarmName.' .............................................................................................................................. y:......... ............................................. ....
Owner Name : ................................................... .............
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:
MailingAddress: .........................................................................................
Onsite Representative:.......... . u` "� ........... . hzz+ .............
Certified Operator :...................................................
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
....................................................................................................
Phone No:
......... ...........
................................................... ................. ......... I ...... ... ..........................
Integrator:.....- hf. e..¢�• vl.
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Latitude Longitude �• �`°L
Design Current. Design. Current , . _' Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry: Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean Q
Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
El to Finish Total Design.Capacity
❑ .
Gilts ,
❑ Boars _ ,Total' SSM
!Number of Lagoons, Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
-
-Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: rSq,x Z frr`— �
Freeboard (inches): ...............Z........ ...................4 .... .................
5- Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
RCNo
❑ Yes
Iro
❑ Yes
No
Structure
6
❑ Yes KNO
Continued onback
3/23/99

Facility Number: 7 1 - ,S' hate of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
I0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type ! _" i-•L i.t/L[_'Z�' Soy�Lg,- —
E-
❑ Yes �CNo
❑ Yes do
❑ Yes X-NO
❑ Yes "'15eo
❑ Yes )610
❑ Yes PO
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: a yiglateQris:or aefcienues.�re h...d' ilik*rifng #his:visit; - Yoi� will-teeeiye rio fuftW -.
corresnondeiree. aha�uf~ thL'S visit_ ........... . . ........... ... ... . ... .
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes X
No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 91,40
❑ Yes KNO
❑ Yes Ir0
Cl Yes �rNo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes �Pqo
❑ Yes qfi�o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
3/23/99

Facility Number: — s
Date of Inspection lZ-
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
[� No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
El Yes
No
30_
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
o
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
o
Additional Uomments and/or Drawin
ic
3/23/99

Routine
Of
Facility Number 71 55
Permitted 11 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified ® Registered
ow -up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 6/9/1999
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[] Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: W. AhAFar K-6....................... ... County: P�odt [----------------------. Ia' Q ---
OwnerName: Craig i..._.._.._.._.•-•.-..-..-•................... Phone No} 910-ZSSZ692_.._.._.._.._..-.._.....-..-.....-.....-.._
Facility Contact:........................................................... Title: =' . • Phone No:
Mailing Address: 1216..Gar1audJ a g.Rd...................................................... T=W N.0 ............................................. 2$46.4..........
Onsite Representative: Rutldy.>(Ciag_.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _..... _.. _.. Integrator:
Certified Operator: Tracie.4....................... P.arkaer................................... Operator Certification Number. 17263 ......................
Location of Farm:
Southeast uf_Willaard. _Take�xit3QQ�'tam.�-4Q}fora 1et'L.�_0.3�nule.tWrn�le#.on SR 13�4, .Cv� �:�, mile�,xura lefk oASR.l�L3.. �`
I+a�a�is.Q.S mile.ap.lrl9t......... _.. _.............. _.. _.. _.. _........... _........... _.. _...., ........._................::::.......::......_................................... _.. _.......... �
Latitude 34- ' F 40 Longitude77 • 57 1 40 €u
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at_ ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field j] Other y
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DW,Q-*
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State.otl er' than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4' -Structure 5
Identifier:
❑ Yes © No
❑ Yes © No
❑ Yes © No
❑ Yes N No
El Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches): -- -- -- --39-- -- -- -- - - -- 33 -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - -- -- - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- --
5. Are there any inunediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, Severe erosion, ❑ Yes 0 No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

14PRoutine O Complaint O Follow- p of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review.;- O Other
lity N71 .56 Date of Inspection.
Facilumber :r 12/9/1999
it Time of Inspection 1406 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted IM Certified E3 Conditionally Cert fled ® Registered 10 Not Operation Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: W..WhaFamJK- A................................................................... County: P usiex------._.-------------- ----
Owner Name: Czaig - - - - - - -Kind _,. _................. _........ _........... _.. Phone No: 910. 2,8,5 Z692
Facility Contact: ........................................................... Title: Phone No:
Mailing Address: 12.6.Gar1=d.I0znR9ad.................................................. Tgacbi yN.C............................................. 2$.4.6.4..........
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: Budd
P X........................�..�i��...........................•...... Operator..CertiticationNumber:li72,63......................
Location of Farm:
'�.outlreastnf_Willard. Tape.e�it3QQ�'i�.oat��Q,.turalefX._�n_43anWe_turaleft_on��1314._�1.�milea,�uruLefitaaSRl�L3._ �
IFarwis {1.5 mile.nn3eft... _........ _.._................................... _........ _........ _.. _.............. _.. _.. _.. _............. _........... _,............. .................. _..... _. .
=�Latitude F • O1 5T
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :F"Jr
- - : -/-•� ---•. - ...
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
1248
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
1,248
84
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 7'
'r�• : ,.�, .- " ,. ❑Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?' "�' ' '"` ❑ Yes © No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes © No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?:
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) � _• _ = ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway . , :. ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4„ Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......J..(A�ack) -... _.. 2 (Frond............. _.. _........... _..... . _.. _..... _.. _.. _.. _.. _.: _
Freeboard (inches): -- -- -- --24-- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -24 -- - -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ..
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees; severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
• - �r�Qnnn�

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ' 0 Other Agency
Wivision of Water Quality
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other l
Facility Number s Date of Inspection I lili if-4
Time of Inspection .c d 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 0(certified © Applied for Permit 4(Perinitted © Not O erational 7 Date Last Operated:Farts Name:...................-.�.........------......................--.--..............-...................................... County:.....!...�.`.� .... .................�:.... ...
Owner Name: ............. C'.r !"; .....i "< N Phone No: ! {,7 - ?_ S.r....2� q Z..................
..................................................................... ........
Facility Contact:......................................................... .. Title:.................. .. Phone No:
Mailing Address: ..........�.2...':. `��` i.....�L`
...... .............................................2....46. f ...........
Onsite Representative:.............t'!.:........ L.:1'1................................................... Integrator:.........`. .....................................
Certified Operator; .................................... << ...... Operator Certification Number ;.........................................
of Farm:
Y,
-1- U. 3 n.: --I o f, n
1�[ (ro i.3 w; �o Sire. 5r5h...-urn....le��..�n...s.P-..1..�3.-..Fa.,, %1 ', d'.... ........................ S. ....�..3.........:.....- 5
Latitude Longitude
000 �
• ' " • '
l.V�illl �'
❑ Layer
"li4tJal.l i]`:__i
VtI V1l�LlVll"
❑ Non -Layer
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
VNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
� No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
WNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Y>%.
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
(Mo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
KNO
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
ElYes
No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
`
mai ntenancelimpfovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
7/25/97

Facility Number•
.' 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes `1/1 No
Structures La oons oldie Ponds Flush Pits etc.)((�\
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes W No
Structure L Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
identifier: .......................
Freeboard (ft): ..........3..4.E __
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes 'O'No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes VNo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes (<o
Waste Application
�
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes L}9 No
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type .....................[1.yg:..........--- .................................------...............----..........................---------.........---..................------........--.------....................•--.---
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑-Yes NNNo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes b6o
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes VTo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes WNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes plo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes XNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
WYes ❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes WNo
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes �'!No
25.
Were any additional -problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes �No
- No:violations_ or deFtdencies: were, noted,ditring this: Visit:, You rill receive, ito:furtlier : ;
:. correspQ4de O about this:viAL, : : .
1 Z.. Cv.j4:A-e --a ;,..Proe.L Y��gG '}:�.� G✓Ow•t/ 1a'�Ov+S 4.5 j�!
e oche- COft+"_Ol
�I rrta loo;�� rLG„���.s D � .5; P�
itGcp re-car-J S � � '�� ` y
hG d0,,t k .0
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:— %A_w 'il,A Date: t ! , / 7 — r y

14BRoutine OComplaint OFoHow-upof DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC- review 00ther I
Facility Number 7i 56 Date of Inspection 10-8-1998
Time of Inspection F 10.00 124 br. (hb:mm)
E3 Registered E Certified 13 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: WMA&FAM& .6 ................................................................... County:
Owner Name: ... ... Phone No: 21l1..285r2b22......
Facility Contact: Title: .......... Phone No: Z85-.2.692 ........................
Mailing Address: 126.GarhnAYjuZRd .................................................... 1mchey-N.C. ...................................... n.464 ..........
A-
Onsite Representative: Inte rator
Certified Operator: TrAmig.1, ........................ Parkex .................................. Operai'or Certification Number: JL7263 ......................
Location of Farm:
SR A
............................................................. I ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Longitude -57 11 =4 0 _j Latitude E '71 1- 77
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon 0 Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? Yes IR No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWO) E] Yes g No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin? n/a
at-
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/bolding ponds) require E] Yes HNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 0 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
Yes No
7/25/97
Cr t
Continued on back

Facility Number. 71-56 1 Date of Ilnspection 10-S-I998
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which geed to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
19 No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
ONO
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(lf): ..3.12..--------...........................
--------•--•--•-----------• -------------------•-------
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
No
. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type _.. �0]IDLGSiI�g�.c�t .iitssitt)_..-.--........_.. _.. _.iNbt;at-•- -•---. _................. _.. _.. Sl2Xbea- ----.. _.. _.. _. _.. _..............
_.. --• -••
-•- --. -.• -•. -.. _.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
IT Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Cl Yes
® No
2l. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
19 Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Yes
❑ No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Need to take waste samples of lagoon every 120 days. Need to take soil test once a year on all spray fields. Need to fill out insect
rol and odor control checklists for farm.
-- --
N1^eed to change operat6 in charge for farm. -
Need to use correct nitrogen rates on hT-2 forms to correspond with pumping lagoon.
Need to start keeping weekly freeboard levels of lagoon. Farm is permitted.
Need to mail Guidelines for 100 lbs N/acre for small grain.
J
V
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Fa3rdaih F -
RavinwPr/�naranrtn� Cianatnro� . '� : � ' ',: llwtae

_. Routine Q Complaint Q Foila -up of D�VQinspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review_ Q Other
Date of Inspection Fr- z-y
Facility Number 5 Time of Inspection : 3 o Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: ..... ....:. --L,!2 Total Time (in hours) Spent onReidew
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: ---- ----- -71>�r
Owner Name:....i!� �Cr .._ — _ .. _ I N
Phone 1\'0: Z S
Mailing address: i Z 6eA C L Alu D
Onsite Representative:, Integrator. 7JE T
..� _ ..._ ._.....�_....� ....'�'.._._.'!!.... _ .......�....�
Certified Operator: !1' �%�`Q _ __ ._�. Operator Certification Number: _......... ...... ....
Location of Farm:
Latitude' 1/v K Longitude
Not O erational Date Last Operated:
of Operation and Design Capacity
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Io�'A
Laver
I
El Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
X.
'_'v;'
❑Beef
❑ Other Type of Livestock
-.. _
„� �1\Tnmber o£Lagooas / Holdtngcl?onds -Z - x ❑ Subsurface Drains Present `"
.V,
s
ID Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area -w..£ � V `� ,.
4
Z 38J�
General,
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
2_ Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONO
a_ If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes .❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
j. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes V] No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes *,No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in coi inpliance with any applicable setback criteria? M
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/I/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft):
Lagoon 1
.y
Lagoon') Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage_ observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity -of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any o'fthe structures need maintenance/i nprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13'. Do ariy of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type._ ]�
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management PIan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate_acreage far land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improverrient?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only • - -
2.0. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal. Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improverrient?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes [A No
❑ Yes JQ No
❑ Yes fiD No
❑ Yes (allo
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes 6 No
❑ Yes E No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes
fi3No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
® INTO
❑ Yes
JZ No
❑ Yes
R No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes El No
®Yes 41No
❑ Yes ,Z] No
❑ Yes 91 No
Corrunents (refereto:quest�on #) �Explarrf any�YF,S answers�,and/or�any recomrnendattans or any other comments � � . � ��
Use drawings .of facility to heifer a giain srtuafrons e addatronal> ages as necessary) �
w MAW
Vi A/U 4 5 f- 4 C,,n 5-1 r-1 4 r_0 rV i iJ 0104140r4e", ' A-f 7H<.5 7;; .. _
7
Q
Iwo,
Reviewer/Inspector Name "
ra;: _, -'
Reviwer/InspectorSignature: j
-
_ Date:
2- Z`i-17
,1Q
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

r--- - - - - - - - - - - --- --
Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Qther Agency
® Division of Water Quality
Routine O Complaint O Follow-ue of DW inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
# Facility Number 71 5b Date of inspection 2/24/1997
Time of Inspection i4:30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered 13 Certified 13 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: KiagF Kfi.................................................................... County: Pcnuder.----------------------- �!'1RQ----
Owner Name: lGrai_. _.. _.. _.. _.......... Klux.. _.. _..... __. _.... PhoneNo:-2692.
285
Facility Contact: ...........................................................Title: Phone No:
Mailing Address: 1Zf. arluioud lKi�u Rd.........._...........................................Teubex.NC............................................ 28464..........
Onsite Representative; Craig King ... ... .................. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... -... Integrator: _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _..... _.. _.. _.............. _.. _
Certified Operator: TrWa.L ........................ P.a,rker................................... Operator Certification Number:. 17263 ......................
Location of Farm:
�autl�a�tRf.W.illar�da.T.esi�t�20.f�w.m�-9�..#a�rn.le�t,.G�v.Q.�.toile.�tueat.>Rft.Qrt.���.1�.14...�a.1..�.miles..t�uxa.Ie�t.on�R.l�l.3.... �
Earmis_ll..5m&_Qn1eft............................................................. .............................................................. •--•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•---- �
Latitude 34 € • 4d ; 21 " Longitude 77
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenanc /improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
t%
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Othe"
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 19 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, not DWQ} - ❑ Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min7
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
` � []Yes % No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? _ ❑ Yes 0 No
S; >:_.J '
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? �''.' ❑ Yes a No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 0 No
maintenance/improvement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes H No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ® No
7125/97 Continued on back

. :., ...:...,
® Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other ;Agency
❑ Division of Water Quality =
Routine O Com taint oFoHow-upofDWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection .10/30/1997
F__�acili�tyNum ber 71 56,> Time of Inspection 0900 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered 0 Certified 0 Applied for Permit Q Permitted 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Ki,up,FaTA1.tK4..................... .. County: Peader.----------------------- I�IRQ----
Owner Name: Kjp g Falrnl5 . _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. .
- -.. _.. _..... _........ ...... ... ... ... ... ... .�.... _.. _ PhoneNo: 4.1.0: �,85=.2�2z _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _........... _.. _....
Facility Contact: lluddy.K,,jAg.......................................Title: Manage................................ Phone No: (1Q ............
Mailing Address: 126.Garlab.i King Rd ...................... y
............................... Temche �Y.C..:-•--•--.................................. 2B464 ..........
Onsite Representative: uddxl�jag.__.._.._....._....._..........._..--•-••-•--.._.._.._.:_... Integrator:..............._.._.._.------•-••-•---•-.._....._.._......_...._
p ... Operator Certification Number: 17Z63.............. Certified Operator: Trade.L�........................ Paxkex................................ ........
7 nrmfinn of 17a rM.
inutlt�astuf.W.iltardR.Ta�kue.cart320.fi�am��Q..t�uxu.t�t#,..�[l,�.mile.�kurn�l�#t.Qn.��.13.1'4,..i;�a.L3.mils.�..tu�a.te�t.vmS�3.1�x�,... y
?arenas_O.S�naiJ�e.an�e�it.-•--•-----•--•-- --•--•--•--.....----•--•--•--•--_-_._............-•--•--•--•--•--------. -- -------•--•---•--•--•----------------------- --
Latitude 34 `• 40 21
ga Ca
Swine ...... -. .
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
648
648
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Longitude 1' 77� • 57 �� 40:.
nt ..:Design. ...Current
Son Poultrt' .:...:..:.. Ca Pq citation : C
pai... o . rr
Layer k�
tittle ...
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancerimprovement7 ❑Yes CK No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes X No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
�Y
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)„ _ - , . ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? w ❑ Yes M No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? w- ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? - _ ❑ Yes 19 No
7/25/97 Continued on back
v 2y. uw
r F

7.
® Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
0 Division of Water Quality "
10 Routine O Com laint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection i0130/1997
# Facility Number 71 56
e Time of Inspection 0900 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E3 Registered 0 Certified 13 Applied for Permit E3 Permitted JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: K- EXpansi9a..................... ... County= X!cnder.--------- •----------1!'I8[Z----
Owner Name: Kiu Faarms.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.... _.. _. ...... _.. _.. _.. _. _.. _.. _ Phone No:
Facility Contact: liUS1dX I�iIRg...................•-....-............:Title: .A.Wngr...................................... Phone No: 9.10- $S-.557.>i.......... .......
Mailing Address:.1.26.GarlsuA King Rd ................................. :................... Trmbey..NC ........................................... 7.,84b4..........
Onsite Representative: Buddx Kaug .............. _..... _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.................. Integrator: _.. -• .... ... ... ... ... _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _..... _..... _.. _.. _
Certified Operator: Cxaig............................. King............. ... ... Operator Certification Number: d'12411..................
Location of Farm:
iauxb�ast nf.'4�ailard...Tabae.csiRt�Q.fxsim l;Q..t�ara.lelik...G� �,.mile.�tury [eft.>ta.Sl.1�.4,..a! 1..miles,.tuKn.left.om ll.... A
arm11_0,S.=i .QU1dL-•--•--•-- --•--•--•-----•-...
Latitude 34 ? OF 40 21 " Longitude F 77 '- 57
Des= n'Cprrei# Devi .n=• ..::Current Swie
.pety:Curr..n...t.....
iilition :POUR Po elation ...:._°n: t..........
:
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
600
600
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
21]❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ No Liquid Waste Manager
General
l . Are there any buffers that need maintenance/tmprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? - -
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other r =~ a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? -
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, n6tif '-lJWQ) --
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?_-
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? -
❑ Yes
§0 No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
9 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/impr6vement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?.
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes 0 No
Continued on back

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. _ �.-_ 57,o
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGE?YIENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE. - I , 1996
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: i e) E c , 1-0 P. !�A
Mailing Address: ! Z-(Q (a ' I Azv D V_„ij c1• 2arrQ _:µ A c 4-I y A)L_ Zb'-fG 4 _
County: F' r OL
Inte--ator: -T p ►'- ?F_N Qg_AJ` _ _ -- Phone:
On Site Representative: _ _ _ Phone: ? S 5 2 z9
Physical Address/Location: Z g 1313 Z , f Im', &J "-r k n _tg j A-rN�Al-r=.
Type of Operation: S wine X Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DELI Certification Number: ACE DEI Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 `- 40 ' ZS Longitude: 7 -' S 7 ' Iq Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does.the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient L-zeboard of l Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) 6!Por No Actual Freeboard: Z. Ft. $ Inches
Was any seepage observed froze the lagoon(s)? Yes or( o Was any erosion observed? Yes r No
Is adequate land available for spravv_�__(�S_or No Is the cover crop adequate? es r No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setbact criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? YCr No '
100 Feet from Wells? De or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line S iream? Yes orcgD
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or�o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing sysiem, or other -
similar maze -made devices? Yes 062 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cove_ crop)? le or No
Additional Comments: GIL Ri91N
}inI LA(rnOn _,-xcAvgTE,�. 5_ePs.o ,Z O ►ZTG,e/iJ� I�'�E w!9il5
_� �X.�k„c.1Cr L,ACnsa�tl•,4ND ArP.OuN�� �xrS7An1LT t��5�'�_ A1I`E�'��To
��,c► 2 �y1e� t✓F�2� C u �! , LO Z f}(��,roQl1.4TE= rn� T rftLJ1[%WW_r-
-,�:2eC AA7/0AC1 DV L e- All 6-p-e-, CL CC ,-y X> r iz�/ d /[�7.
..poi Sr�L�L2
Inspector Name
S' mature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use .attachments if Needed.