940001_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua!

IN
)fJEC 10ANt8no

9
M Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
lt
940001 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS940001
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Washington Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
1211512016 Entry Time: 10:30 am
Exit Time: 11:45 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Somerset Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Jct LLC
Phone:
910-293-3434
Mailing Address:
PO Box 856
Warsaw NC 283980856
Physical Address:
Sr 1139 1855-A N Line Rd
Roper NC 27970
Facility Status:
M C El N C 1'
I Murphy -Brown LLC
omp3anof omp canntegrator.
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 5320" Longitude: 76° 32' 09"
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC
Question Areas:
Dischrge 8 Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, 8 Treat
Other Issues
Waste Application
Certified Operator: William Van Staalduinen Operator Certification Number: 1001304
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Curtis Barwick Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Curtis Barwick Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: 1
2 3
10-18-16 = .80 .97
1.04
6-15-16 1.44
2.16 2.68
2-12-16 1.24
1.66 1.43
IRR records are complete 8 balanced out.
soil tested - due in 2017
Reviewed: rainfall/freeboard; transfer record; sludge survey in 2016, calibration of Aerway.
Note: Please check #5A for seepage in one end of building.
page: 1

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/15/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 59,000 51,000
Total Design Capacity: 59,000
Total SSLW: 7,965,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1
39M
Lagoon
2
38,00
Lagoon
3
37.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS940001
Owner - Facility : Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/15/16 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑M
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[]
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility : JCS LLC Facility Number:
940001
Inspection Date: 12/15/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn, wheat. Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type i
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na He
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
�]
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

a
Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility : Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/15/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑ ❑
(NPDE=S only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number:
940001 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit.
1210812015 EntryTime: 10:30 am
Farm Name:
Somerset Farm
Owner:
Jct LLC
Mailing Address:
PO Box 856
Active Permit: AWS940001
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Washington Region:
Exit Time: 12:OOpm Incident#
Owner Email:
Phone:
Warsaw NC 283980856
Physical Address: Sr 1139 1855-A N Line Rd Roper NC 27970
Facility Status: ❑ I Murphy -Brown LLC
❑ Denied Access
Washington
910-293-3434
Compliant Not Compliant ntegrator.
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 5320" Longitude: 76° 32' 09"
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other issues
Certified Operator: Eddie M Matthews Operator Certification Number: 998162
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Curtis Barwick Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Curtis Barwick Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary [nspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysi&l 2 3 soil tested: 2014
10-16-15 .75 .80 .90
6-10-15 1,72 2.46 2.49
2-10-15 1.30 2,35 2,33
IRR records on corn & wheat were balanced out.
Reviewed: freeboardlrainfail, sludge survey & calibration due in 2016
NOTE: A visual inspection of outside of each house was made and no concerns were noted.
page: 1

,►
Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility : Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 59,000 50.000
Total Design Capacity: 59,000
Total S5LW: 7,955.000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1
39,00
Lagoon
2
36.00
Lagoon
3
25.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility : Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
El
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M El
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na Me
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large
❑
■ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
$. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑M
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%n110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
[]
Evidence of wind drift?
[]
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

e
rr
Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility : Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yea
No No No
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

s'
Permit: AWS940001
Owner - Facility : Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
25. Did the facility fall to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
tither Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
[]
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
N ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

IF
■ Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soii and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 940001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS940001 ❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit. Routine County: Washington Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/04/2014 Entry Time: 10:30 am Exit Time: 11:50 am Incident #
Farm Name: Somerset Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Jet LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 856 Warsaw NC 283980856
Physical Address: Sr 1139 1855-A N Line Rd Roper NC 27970
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Latitude: 35° 53' 20"
Longitude: 76" 32' 09"
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other issues
Certified Operator: Eddie M Matthews Operator Certification Number: 998162
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Curtis Barwick Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Curtis Barwick Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
1 2
3
10,31.14 = 1.21
1.4819.76
5.28.14 2.03
2.23/8.58
3.26.14 1.76
3.11/3.33
12.17,13 1.64
1.75
soil tested: 2013
1.51 2,72
2.37
2.4413.20
.81
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: rainfall, freeboard, & stocking records. Sludge surveys due in 2014.
House # 7 has a pipe missing, please replace this.
page: 1

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility : Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/04/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1
39,00
Lagoon
2
50A0
Lagoon
3
29.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility : Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/04/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage S Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? .
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. 1s there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑.
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility : Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/04/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste ARPlication
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Small Grain cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑0
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
Cl
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

J
Permit: AWS940001
Owner - Facility : Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/04/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Me
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M Cl
❑
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 940001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS940001 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Somoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Washington Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12103/2013 Entry Time: 01:QQ PM Exit Time: 02:05 PM
Farm Name: Somerset Farm
Owner: J t LLC
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 85Q ____ Warsaw NC 283980856
Physical Address: r 1139Line Rd Roper NC 27970
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC
Integrator: Meshy -Brown LLC
Latitude:35°53'20" Longitude: 76°32'09"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Eddie M Matthews
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Curtis Barwick
Operator Certification Number: 998162
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Curtis Barwick Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
soil tested: Nov. 2013
7-31-13 = 1.52
2.14
1.84
6-17-13 = 2.92
2.25
6.41
3-12-13 = 2.17
2.81
2.64
1-23-13 = 1.31
3.43
2.31
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard, stocking & crop yield are recorded.
LOOKS Good! Remeber to change the OIC.
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number; 940001
Inspection Date: 12/03/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 59,000 32,285
Total Design Capacity: 59,000
Total SSLW: 7,965,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
1
35.00
agoon
2
29.00
agoon
3
24.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/03/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ ❑ n
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field n
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ Q
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n ■
o
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or n ■ ❑ CJ
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or n ■ n n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

f�
I
Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/03/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
{
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Yes No NA NE
Corn (Grain)
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12103/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ 0 ❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ 0 ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 12/03/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, 0 ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
I
Page: 6

3
1.
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 940001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS940001 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Washinaton Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11L1412012 _ Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 10:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: So-merset Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Jct LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 858 Warsaw NC 283980856
Physical Address: 5r 1129 1 §55-A N Line Rd Roper NC 27970
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°53'20" Longitude: 76°32'09"
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael Ray Griffin Operator Certification Number: 26541
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AW5940001 Owner - Facility: Jcl LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 11/14/2012 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: 1 2 3
10-10-12 = 1.66 1.03 1.57
8-3-12 = 1.28 1.38 1.15
6-19-12 = .87 .96 2.3
3-2-12 = .15 .24
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & stocking records are complete & were reviewed
10/2012 & sludge survey taken in May 2012.
Remember to take another soil test before the end of 2012.
Looks Good!
Calibration done
Page: 2

0
Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jet LLC
Inspection Date: 1111412012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 940001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 59,000 42,442
Total Design Capacity: 59,000
Total SSLW: 7,965,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
1
42.00
agoon
2
31.00
agoon
3
31.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS940001 Owner -Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 1111412012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) Q ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the Slate other than ❑ ■ 11 Q
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Inspection Date: 11/14/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 940001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
Cl
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
Q
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type i
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
Q
❑
Plan(GAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q ■
Q
Q
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes. check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Q
Page: 5

Permit: AWS940001 Owner -Facility; Jct LLC Facility Number. 940001
Inspection Date: 11/14/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute.inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ 01111
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS940001 Owner -Facility: dct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 1111412012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report 110130
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 940001 Facility Status: Agtive _ Permit: AWM40001 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: i n Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Washington — Region: Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11I0212011 Entry Time: 02700 PM Exit Time: 03:QQ EM Incident #:
Farm Name: Somerset Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Jct LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 856 Wgr aw NC 283980856
Physical Address: Sr 1159 1$55-A_1 Line Rd _ Roper NC 27970
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°53'20" Longitude: 76 32'09"
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues r
Certified Operator: Michael Ray Griffin Operator Certification Number: 26541
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives}: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
. On -site representative Michael Griffin Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jet LLC Facility Number. 940001
Inspection Date: 11/02/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 3-8-11
10-25-11 = .66 1.0 1.3
9-19-11 = .77 .89 1.4
8-15-11 = .91 1.9 1.7
2-25-11 = 3.1 3.3 4.0 4-25-11 = 8.5 Sludge
AR's are complete & balanced out.
Sludge survey & caliberation done in 2011
Note: old houses at site 8 & 9 have been demoloished & sludge is still stockpilled on site.
Looks Good!
Page: 2

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jc1 LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 1110212011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 59,000 500
Total Design Capacity: 59,000
Total SSLW: 7,965,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1
29.00
agoon
2
26.00
agoon
3
47.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jet LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 11/02/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ MOD
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
U ■ U
U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Inspection Date: 11/02/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 940001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
000 ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AW5940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 1110212011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
Q
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Q
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
Q
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? G ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate ❑ ■
1111
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AW5940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Inspection Date: 11/02/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Facility Number: 940001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ Cl ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral ® Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ��Region:
Farm Name: ®® y Owner Email:
Owner Name: / Li�rh/„ _ ,��,,�„ i �t� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
d-0100c-7c?� �a v-coil- Pc - 031►
Design Current
Swine106-2—pa—ENAIRoop.
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Cattle
Design C►urrent
C+apacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
D . P,oul_ , Ca achy P,o .
I Layers
Non-Dai
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure [ Apptication Field ❑ Other:
EZ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
PeYes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? .'�
S jJ ?)
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
E2 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[:]Yes
E3'5-o
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

fteility Number: y 4 - [Date of Inspection: � �[
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permii conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA VNE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NNE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[:]Yes
[—]No
❑ NA
[ONE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
UINo
❑ NA
0&
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[Z/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers: and/or any. additional . recommendations or, any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary):,
3
0_�
pj,uj
h$
49
Reviewer/Inspector Name: / ' fA ✓
P49 (t
Phone: ql9T_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: y ` a �p — /l
Page 3 of 3 (/ 21412011

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 940001 _ Facility Status: Active _ Permit: PW$940001 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspectign Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routing _ County: Washington Region: Washington _
Date of Visit: Q61 Q12010 Entry Time:09 QQ_AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Somerset Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Jct I L , _ _ _ Phone: [phone]_ _
Mailing Address: PO Box 856 Warsaw NC 283980856
Physical Address: Sr 1139 ig5L6 N Line Rd R oer NC 27970
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mumhv-Brown. LLC
Location of Faun: Latitude: 35"53'20" Longitude: 7E'32'Q9"
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment © Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael Ray Griffin Operator Certification Number: 26541
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Norris Phone:
On -site representative Michael Michael & Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jet LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 06/10/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
3-11-10 = 7.5/#79
3-5-10 = 1.7/70 2.2175 3.8l79
3.1 S 1.5 L
soil tested 2009 Calib. 2009 SS 2010
Freeboard ranges #1 -12.5" on 2-10-10 to 44" on June 2009
#2 - 16" ...«... 40 ...«.....
#3 - 13" 32
IRR records on computer are complete and looks great!
Page: 2

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jet LLC
Facility Number : 940001
Inspection Date: 06/10/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish - 59,000 45,000
Total Design Capacity: 59,000
Total SSLW: 7,965,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start hate Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Flo'n
1
42.00
goon
2
36.00
agoon
3
46.00
Page: 3

Perrnit: AWS940001 owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 06/10/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0130
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑
■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? -
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management.
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

0
Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jet LLC
Inspection Date: 06110/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 940001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 101/16/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com,
Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number. 940001
Inspection Date: 06/1012010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AVVS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Inspection Date: 06/10/2010 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 940001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 940001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS940OQ1 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Washington Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02j24/22Q09 Entry Time:11 10 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Somerset Fawn _
Owner: Jct LLC
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: PO Box 856 _Warsaw NC 28398085§
Physical Address: Sr 1139 1855-A N Line Rd Roper NC 2727Q
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown, LLO
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°53'20" Longitude: 76°32'09"
Newland Road - 6.5 mites east of Roper NC
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael Ray Griffin Operator Certification Number: 26541
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Norris Phone:
On -site representative Michael Norris Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:70 75 79
12-19-08 2.8 2.4 2.8
10-15-08 1.3 2.2 2.2
B-27-08 1.2 2.2 3.6
soil test is current
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Inspection Date: 0212412009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Facility Number: 940001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 59,000 59,000
Total Design Capacity: 59,000
Total SSLW: 7,965,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
30.00
agoon
2
25.00
agoon
3
20.50
Page: 2

M
Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 02/24/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
Cl
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 02/24/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? . ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type t
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
Cl
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
1B. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jet LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 0212412009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 02/24/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? 11000
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency n
Facility Number: 940001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AM940001 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comolignce Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Washington Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06126/200a__ Entry Time:10:00 A IM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Somerset Farm
Owner: Jet LLC
Mailing Address: P
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: Sr 1139 1855-A N Line Rd Roper NC 27970 , T
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator: tN urohy-Brown LLC
Latitude: 35°53'20" Longitude: 76°32'09"
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael Ray Griffin Operator Certification Number: 26541
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Norris Phone:
On -site representative Michael Norris Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 06/26/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:#1 #2 #3
5-16-08 2.2 3.3 Z5
4-7-08 2.5 4.5 3.4
3-25-08 2.6 4.0
1-23-08 4.2 2.3 2.3
/soil test - did not have the current one in the records. Please get this copy added to records,
feed bins need attention; spilled feed rotting at several of the houses.
#25 Sludge surveys have been done on all 3 lagoons; however they have haigh amounts of sludge in them.
#1 = 1.53' #2 = 4.88' #3 4.44'
there is no plan of action so please address this situtation before Permit renewable time in 2009.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Inspection Date: 06/26/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 940001
Reason For Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 59,000 59,000
Total Design Capacity: 59,000
Total SSLW: 7,965,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon
1
51.00
agoon
2
39.00
agoon
3
33.00
Page: 3

j
Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 06/26/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Im acts
Yes No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Is ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le.l large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ 110
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
110 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

0
Permit: AWS940001 Owner - Facility: Jet LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 0612612008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com (Grain)
Crop Type 2 Soybean, wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
%, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑
❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
I]
Page: 5

Permit: AVVS940001 owner - Facility: Jet LLC
Facility Number : 940001
Inspection Date: 06/26/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design? _
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
000
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

4
Permit: AW5940001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Facility Number : 940001
Inspection Date: 06126/2008 inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 940001 Facility Status: Permit: NQ6294001 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type. Compliance In tin Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routioe - County: Washinaton Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0610 /2007 Entry Time.09:50 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Somerset Far, Owner Email:
Owner: Jct LLC _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1970 Am-brosp, Rd Creswell NC 27928
Physical Address: Sr 1139Roper NC 27970 _
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC
Latitude: 35°52'03" Longitude: 79°33'16" _
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
t
Certified Operator: Michael Ray Griffin Operator Certification Number: 26541
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Griffin Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
1 2 3
2-27-07 2.5
1-23-07 2.4 2.8 3.5
3-7-07 2.4 3.3 3.2
soil test 2007
Irr's balanced out & everything looks good.
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 06/05/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 59,000 59,000
Total Design Capacity: 59,000
Total SSLW: 7,965,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
49.00
agoon
2
34.06
agoon
3
35.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA294001 Owner -Facility: Jet LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 06/05/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
1101111
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
110011
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: M001
Inspection Date: 06/05/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Q
Total P205? Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Q
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? Q
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management 0000
Plan(CAWMP)?
15_ Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? Q ■ ❑ 11
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■0 ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

11
Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Facility Number : 940001
Inspection Date: 06/05/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
nal-_
V..
Nn
NA
MF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. Al the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Inspection Date: 06/05/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewrnspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 940001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

I
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 940001 Facility Status: Active Permit: tICA294001 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: m fiance Insgection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wa hington Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11 1 2 6 Entry Time.10:20 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Somerset Farm
Owner: Jct LLC
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 1970 Ambrose Rd Creswell NC 27928
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Phone: [phone]
Latitude:35"52'03" _ Longitude:76°33'16"
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Richard Ellis Murphy Operator Certification Number: 28958
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Richard Murphy Phone. [phone]
24 hour contact name Richard Murphy Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil test Sept. 2005 and 2006 samples are pulled.
Date:
#30 Site 4 #2 incenterator was too full and smoking heavily, partly because afoot was caught and the lid wasn't properly closed.
This was addressed while I was on site, the foot was moved and lid was closed. I also called DAQ at WaRO and spoke with Michelle
at 12:20 PM to report this incident.
Waste analyses: 1 2 3
8-22-06 1.1
8-30-06 .75 .70
3-9-06 2.8 4.1 3.1
Page: 1

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 11/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 59,000 48,000
Total Design Capacity: 59,000
Total SSLW: 7,965,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
42.00
Lagoon
2
35.00
agoon
3
34.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 1110112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10- Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0110
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Inspection Date: 11/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 940001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Other
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
110011
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17_ Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 1110112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
Q
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Q
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
Q
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Q
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those Q ■ Q ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 11/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherissues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q M 0
32, Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? 0000
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Numb Facility Status: Active Permit. NCA294001 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Technical As§jsta!gce _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Other _ County: Washington Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02123l2006 Entry Time:01:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: SomgM?,t Farm _ Owner Email:
Owner: Jct LLG Phone: 2�2-793-9449
Mailing Address: 1970 Ambrose Rd Creswell NC 27928
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°52'03" Longitude: 76'33'16"
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC
Question Areas:
W Other issues
Certified Operator: Richard Ellis Murphy Operator Certification Number: 28958
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Richard Murphy Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Since the Division of Air Quality has has several concerns regarding the incenterators on this site, Richard Murphy asked me to visit
the site.
They had all incenterators in operation when I arrived. Even though there was some smoke visible, I did not see and significant
amounts to cause need for concerns.
Richard discussed with me ideas that might help to alleviate some of the concentrated smoke. He will making some changes in the
near future.
I will further investigate this while doing a complete compliance inspection later this summer.
Page: 1

r
Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jet LLC Facility Number: 940001
Inspection Date: 02/23/2006 Inspection Type: Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Other
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
agoon
2
agoon
3
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed nonral rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 011110
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0000
Page: 2

i
0 Division of Water Quality
j] Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency ___________
Facility Number: 940001 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA2944001 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Washington Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/27/2005 Entry Time:10:45 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Somerset Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Jct LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1970 Ambrose Rd Creswell NC 2792
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°52'03" Longitude: 76°33'16"
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Richard Ellis Murphy
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 28958
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Richard Murphy Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Richard Murphy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Page: 1

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility. Jct LLC
Facility Number: 940001
Inspection date: 10127/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis:
1 2
3
Date
1.4
2.5
3.3
12104
3.1
3.2
4.7
3114/05
2.8
5.1
13??
4/14105
1.9
3.2
3.4
6/24/05
1.8
1.9
1.4
8/25105
1.9
1.6
1.9
10/20/05
Soil Test:
11104 and 09105 lime applied
Looking much better - keep up the good work!
Page: 2

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Inspection Date: 10/2712005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 940001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 59,000 52,600
Total Design Capacity: 59,000
Total SSLW: 7,965,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
23.00
agoon
2
22,00
agoon
3
24.00
J
Page: 3

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Inspection Date: 10/2712005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 940001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
n
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
fl
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n ■
00
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n ■
n
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
- d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
110
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
n
■
n
n
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe erosion,
n
■
n
n
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
n
■
n
n
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry
n
■
0
n
stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
1f yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
rl
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
PAN?
fl
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P2O5?
11
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn,
Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Page: 4

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Inspection Date: 1012712005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 940001
Reason for Visit: }Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? n ■
n
n
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■
n
n
16. Did the Facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n ■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
n ■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the Facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Checklists?
F1
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
Fl
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
F1
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
Fl
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? '
❑
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n•
n
Page: 5

Permit: NCA294001 Owner - Facility: Jct LLC
Inspection Date: 10/27/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 940001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
n
■
n
n
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
n
■
n
n
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
n
■
n
n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
n
n
A
Page: 6

Type of visit U Compliance Inspection U Operation Review O Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: LJ Arrival Time: Departure Time: o County: Region:
Farm Name: 4/ Owner Email:
Owner Name: (/( _ Phone:
Mailing Address: Z3?>0 _ _ �vr �
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative,
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm::
e
Phone No:
Integrator: '
Operator Certification Number: M613r
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o ❑ I = Longitude: = ° = d ❑
di
Design Current Design Current
Design
Current
Swine
C•apacty population Vl,et Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
F
❑ La er
,.
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
I
1 1[-] Non -Layer I
I
❑ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
El Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Co
❑ Turke s
OtherNA-
Turke PoultsOther
POther
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure ❑ Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
VYY
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ N
El NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
El Yes
I(J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection �O
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drill ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name 14 ,Lv Phone: —
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: — �Q
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additibbal Commentsi Drawings:
/ AL
W_ P. z� I W0
j
12128104

(Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number c Date of visit: Tune: . 9J
Q Not rational Q Below Threshold
J�Perniitted [j Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above old• _.
Farm Name: .._.._... _� �"" 11' S County: j { _ . __... _...
Owner Name: ..—�� } LLC Phone No:
Mail.mg Address: ��--aw 5 ._
Facility Contact: . _ . _ _ rj.--P
: Phone No: -
Onsite Representative:w
Certified Operator: ��_ AOperator Certification Number: 4
Location of Farm:
ABwine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 u Longitude • 4 Du
Dischames & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �$No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [I Other
'1
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance mart -made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galimin?
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes kNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 0 A
M12/03 0 3d% 3 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (W trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancerimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenarim/i nprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Ov oad ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type ff
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those design9d4�__
- the Certified Anit;Vaste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
W4,+L
/&al a � # 1177 3
04, 1�
❑ Yes P-No
❑ Yes lj� No
❑ Yes d No
❑ Yes 41 No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes .TNo
❑ Yes *No
❑ Yes IZMo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ,P No
❑ Yes jiNo
M '-
r � iiTi
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ff No
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
lMl� y -A ou7f 11/6,/03 A+- ° ST63
Z3
7/,z �0'7
3 Ib
d . w
� 110" L� � l0 � 31 �.� 1 �4�. t^ see aM � . s 9, 1
! i � ` 1' k s e- c- 4 ct +1 rt�+'. � S
Reviewerlinspector Name 21
Reviewer/Impector Signature:
Date:
V
12112 03 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Document.-
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes IFNo
r
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes qNo
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes q No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes [4 No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
26. Fail to notify 7ponallawqe ergency situations as required by General Permit? �
(ie/ disch� board prow , over application) CM Yes ❑ No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes Jallo
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes O No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP7 El Yes , No
NMES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 3 i-35) "Yes ❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No
32_ Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?'� rr ❑ Yes ® No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? �o ye �.e^-� ❑ Yes EP No
35. Does record ping for NPDES t�yuired forms n�'fmprovemen�If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes , No
Stoc ge Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no farther correspondence about this visit.
r .. ._� ..
+,�;{.}.,�_.:a��.a.s..
)4,J
nor `5
N e4 I-L
ca t 1 � s"A1 �'
--
-Ik4c: 5 w ✓
Oct= ;Grp
,�1Q an Gj u.P -b bn,)Jx-- 0Q,
16 "VL aj ,,�� mil` 5 tj t+ 4-o 4e k9v►^ ,wAW J Le-
S Cge,v k ` on I'—/
12112103

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report -p O
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 94 - 0 Date: 123103 Time: 1 12:10 Time On Farm: 45 WaRO
Farm Name Somerset Farm County Washington Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address PO Box 759 Rose Hill, NC 2W8
Onsite
Representative John Bizic Integrator Mu h Brown
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated: 1 ❑ Operating below threshold I
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
59000
O Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaintllocal referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency .
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
i. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ❑ no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ❑ no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large ❑ yes ❑ no
trees, seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence.of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ❑ yes ❑ no
ponding requiring DWQ notification?
b• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ❑ no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ® yes ❑ no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier #1 #2 #3
Level (Inches) 26 8 21
CROP TYPES
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
i. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ❑ no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ❑ no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large ❑ yes ❑ no
trees, seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence.of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ❑ yes ❑ no
ponding requiring DWQ notification?
b• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ❑ no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ® yes ❑ no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier #1 #2 #3
Level (Inches) 26 8 21
CROP TYPES
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

94 - 1 Date:
9/23103
ER
Q No assistance provided/requested
ste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
ste spill contained on site
raNber
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
vel in structural freeboardvel
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment27.
in storm storage
Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproduceraste
structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need (list In comment section)aste
structure needs maintenance
❑
❑
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 2H.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33.Organ lzelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Latelmissing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39.Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date;
43. irrigation design/installation
❑
❑
❑ Other...
system
Date:
44, Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
Wettable Acre Determination
❑
El46.
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationtrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluatlon
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 94 - 1 _� Date: 1 9/23/03
COMMENTS:
Emergency site visit conducted as part of hurricane damage assessment efforts. DWQ was notified of high lagoon levels
prior to site visit.
Operation lost -200 pigs either directly or indirectly from hurricane. Operation is incinerating dead and Ag Protein has
rovided a trailer for dead animal disposal.
Received 8.0 inches of rainfall. Considerable wind damage to buildings.
10 & 11. At time of site visit, operation was transferring waste from lagoon 2 to lagoon 3.
Pre -storm levels were lagoon 1 31 ", lagoon 2 = 22; and lagoon 3 = 31-35 inches. Lagoon 2 was at 12 inches
immediately after the hurricane.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST jPat Hooper
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 9/25103 7 Entered By: jPat Hooper
3 03/10/03

® Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ®Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
tr Date of Visit: 7 Time: d 1
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
A Permitted D Certified D Conditionally Certified D Registered pate Last Operated or Above T reshold: 11
Farm Name: County:
Owner Name: C—F L LC Phone No: 32 6 A
J1 AA�rr�70 —
Mailing Address: 1[9[7 LG �ft r i.►A- _ cl �� W_
o se— 911) C dZ YM5- Y
Facility Contact: ��tn lSi2� c /D �f S�f Title: Tr' Phone No:C91 �l s�gr7
Onsite Representative:.,,, �: 2 +`C J o � �`t� Integrator: � 1^4� `a, 1� - A. s f �*+ S
Certified Operator: ) l►n __ __ __ ____ 2� L Operator Certification Number: �Sy�
Location of Farm:
T —
Of Swine ❑ Poultry []Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 04 0 u Longitude 04 06 0 K
Design Current
swine
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Design Current
Poultry Capacitv Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Discharnes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
pEl
Dai
Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Subsurface Drains Present
No Liquid Waste
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
rea ILj Spray Nlela area I
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Jx ,,No
El Yes 8No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 10No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier: 2 3
Freeboard (inches): o
05103101 2 7 !t �,'k ;2A " Continued

A
z
Facility Number: ?,-I— Date of Inspection (�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?-
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type L_�n , Why* �)ix.j
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes [;�No
[,-Ir Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes 0� No
❑ Yes LKNo
❑ Yes ANo
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ANo
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
;K No
16.
Is there a tack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
MNo
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
B No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ✓ / ✓
ElYes
ErNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
ER/No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
dNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
(13<o
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
Q'No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
RNo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
% Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
J4 No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comm nts�( eier o questeon #i)�"�Eaplain nvgaYES`answers and/kkor,=any.recommettdattons�or anv-other' co merits `'^ � t� �
[)se drav��ngs of facility to.bet#er egplarn situattons. (use,addihanal�pages as3necessarv) _ ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
Rc VAtk 1, 7L,s ► i. r¢t ; s`55 . I
Co, s aC J d - ,,W s-�.�.�,� ,� 6y . a ,� ��.: ke-4
4 41(-,L- DWa Pe-- -1'-b u� .
Ole...a ,.- 15e^j V-11 /11-iv, L 3
4o 4-p— l".
be- W k � - Gp;�kn•ae, k c - d.sL- er,.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 44 Date: 4 .r( —"J
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 1 4-— I I Date of Inspection (a 8
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
❑ No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
s.
., s,
Soil A*J1A lnh-41p1 W],ti�al � �� +�l4/.M- , %ISt4
iS -�►^� � R��P� ice, , .����.—"' I,— �
1 t C4
�
WO tAJ*
v YIN,
,� ��'+ , d, 1.�5 GC r k •�—
0 �!1 C ®ram -fib...
t g��4
eV 7
�— � �'�, ►u 1 � . Sao 3 ��� � t,.� c lx,�.�c ��..�►--1� �rr � l�
O5103101
6rl �1�3

Facility Number: 14 — Date of Inspection P�
-91)
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
EWNo
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
XNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan biade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes]
No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Additional Comments.andldr Drawin
te-en M-J�-Pb 11�hd
v� Ofr. Ste. ��4 6L.3 C'
�N01-P P
+
wxT 'J�.0 a�
to
'dam Y2.�
w j/ - �� -I-,,
`lei
4 `
) owex-f CJ4,ft1 &,4
m cp
` t, i no- AQ' { "-�
1} K v► s'tw1 Wl C'- ► t 9ve— —
Soo-% . z
05103101

(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 11-34-2000 Time:
94 1
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted (3 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .......................
Farm Name: N.UtbliA.C.E.Brin.......................................... .......................................... County: W.ashuagfierk.................................... W. .ARC?........
OwnerName: ................................................... ................................... Phone No: 252-7,914123 ..........................................................
FacilityContact: ................. :................................... I ........................ Title: ................................................................ Phone No
Mailing Address: 47. �pAr�.?xxY............................................................................I...... CirJaW INC.......................................................... 2.7928 .............
Onsite Representative: �!Ie.!?mD]flat.&�x1OtA............................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:, amgA..................................... k l�Xtlip............................................ Operator Certification Number:]$ 11.............................
Location of Farm:
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC •
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle 0 Horse Latitude �• �� ��� Longitude
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................... .....
Freeboard (inches):

5100
Facility Number: 94-1 Date of Inspection 11-30-2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
Continued on back
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes []No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
0" o violatimis:or &Tciencies-were :noted -during this visit:: You: Will -reeeive no further : •
correspondence abnilt this.visit. � .............. ....... .. ........ ....
Facility is under an individual permit and not subject to an operation review at this time
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
IReviewer/Inspector Name Pat Hooper 252-946-6481 I

I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: _ 51001
y Facility Number: 94-1 Date of Inspection 11-30-2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
,&I
ciao

Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 11/21211(10 Time: E=
Facility Number 94 1
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold ..........................
Farm Name: Nal bllAllC. t11C1<I1..... ......................County:.asjAl�IgtAtp..................................... Vl1��R�?........
.....................................
Owner Name: P9jrk.Gx.jjmpt(....................... �x;ioil.�Q�ds..ins................................... Phone No: 252.-7.97.-A1z3 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: d7Ul>LM !.F19MjM............................................ Title: ERV..i]rlR=RIatAjMAugcr........... Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: 3.4Z.S11Ar.C.l2rayC.......................................................................... ......... OrnmelL.N.0 .......................................................... 2.7.928 .............
Onsite Representative: ..... ..................................................................................................... Integrator:..._.
Certified Operator:, amLe.5.. ............................... F.jgj1.1Pz.............. .............................. Operator Certification Number:182,11............... ..............
Location of Farm: _
Newland Road - 6.5 miles east of Roper NC •
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 Longitude • 6
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes 0 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ............... A1................ ............... #2............... ............... #1............... .............................
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Freeboard (inches): 26 27 28
r inn

5/P*
acility Number: 94—I Date of Inspection 11/2/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste ADolication
Continued on bank
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ® Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
13. Rio violati6us:or defieieacies•vvere*noted :during• this ,visit.; N6u: will:receive no further
: : � correspondence about this:visit.:::: ::.:::::: :::::::::: ::::::: :::::
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Records at The Pork Group Office.
7. Bare spots noted on the dike walls. Continue to work toward establishing a grass cover.
Waste samples for 11/30/99, 2/25/00 and 7/13/00.
Soil analyses are collected and lime has been added.
During the months of July (last), August and September, the area received 18" of rain and this farm relie
on third party farmers and irrigation occurs in the spring and fall, mostly.
Two of three lagoons had freeboard problems; DWQ was notified; Plans of Action were developed,
Followed and completed. The lagoon levels gained compliance. SEE PAGE 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name {Lyn Hardison Entered by Ann Tyndall
n ............ � J�.... � «-a «.. C:,...., a....«. ram., a-. - .....

I Reviewer/luspector Signature: Date: 51001
wFacility Number: 9E77771 ©ate of Inspection 11/212000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out. After the 1999 hurricanes, there was some over
application on about one field of 9 lbs., equivalent to < 20% of total PAN.
Overall, the farm is well managed.
If you have any questions, contact me at 252-946-6481, extension 318.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 2, 1999
Mr. Jimmy Fleming
Northline Farm
347 Shore Drive
Creswell, NC 27928
•
AM44V;2
kqcDENR
NQF2TH CAROLINA E)EPARTMENT OF
ENN/IR(=)NMENT AN0 NATURAL RE50URCE5
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Northline Farm
Facility No. 94 -1
Washington County
Dear Mr. Fleming:
On June 1, 1999, 1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the referenced
facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is
attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21-1.0217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the
attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted
concerns, as soon as possible.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist 11
cc: _Ydshington County SWCD Office
,,^aRO
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

i ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
f
®Div[sion of Water.Quality - Compliance:Itispectiori-
- -,-- - -: ©Other Agency -'Operation Review
Ig pouting Q Complaint Q Fnll4)%N--ut) elf DWQ inst':<ection Q Foilo%i--tilt of DSWC revieiN- Q Other
zti `Faciiit%Nuntilcr Dare of Inspection 6-1-99
Time of Inspection 10:15 2.1 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 0 Certified L-3 Conditionaliv Certified [3 Registered Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Nance: MQtllxeJEArm............................................................................................. County: WashjxtZon .................................... WaRO........
Owner Name:...................................................Tyson.F.WAS.Lac................... ............. Pl3Emc Diu: 7�� 1 .......................
F:ic9fit)-
Contavt• ,tpOlt70.1-FleAplUtz............................................. Fir.1e: ERAMBWt;[lt2t Ampct:........... Phone itio:.....................................
\lailin!r ,k(kirt+ss: d.4?..S111D.te.Dsll:e................................................................................... C Cs.R'rM.NC........................................................... Z7.928 .............
C3nsite Rvpresentati+e: i 77A1J. lenlriA .................. InieuratE�r. ..............................
�,
Lcrtii"mti Operator: 3a>[ .1',.(Jimmy)........... Flen ing. ........................................... Operator Curtiticatlim Number.18.211.............................
Lr+cation EJi arm;
�Pk l=d..oa.d.::.b.S.MHC5..east.oi.Ropter.NC...........................................................................................................................................................I..................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. I.................
LionLitude I I' '
Swine
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver ID Dairy '
59000-48.000 ❑ Non -Lay JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Other -
i
Total Design Capacity 59,000
3
Total SSLW 7,965,000
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps L ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Di,chair.:L• &- Stremn lmnact�
1. Is anv discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
i)i;c:l;ir_L on- i�7 Lagoon Spray Field � '' Other
a. tfdl9�lla1'�?t l: Ol)sen-cal. Ivan flit C0111'c�-aShe 131��ll-nLldt:' Yes ? No
b. ff disclian•-�i; nbscii:e i- did 11 reach (It'),es. tlotiA. M',Q) i Yes i_•,_ No
c. Ifdi�chanae is obJs reed- L+hat is the eslitnatk.;d ticn•' in L,a1/inill?
d. Doos discharge bypass a la�oi;uit' i i Yes 7-1 No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Di Yes No
3. Were there an} adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes No
Waste Collection +i Treatment
4- Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway ❑1 Yes +� No
`tril',:Itiri i t]'l1etLlrL Sllul Ciirc: LCI'lICi1.I'� -? �iF11.:R1r� �trE:4tli1'e �J
li?clll it ICr:.................................... .......................
i r��ix;al;i t irlclles,. -
5. Are there auy immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees- severe erosion. ❑ Yes ❑ No
2/� i144 seepage. etc.)
(:nnti►rued an hack

Facility Number: 94-1 Mute (of Inspection 6-1-99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there anv dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt_
roads, building structure.. and/or public propem-)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts. missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters. etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Yes
Z No
Yes
— No
Yes
No
'' { Yes
�E No
7 Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
'X No
�=31

Facility Number: 94-1 Dary +It Inspection 6-1-99
b• Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? C} Yes ,9 No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? LJ Yes U No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? fD Yes 0 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate_ gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markines? F—; Yes '21 No
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
i i Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN
Yes
= No
12. Crop type Corn. Soybeans. Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
Yes
`i No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
j! Yes
E No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
._ Yes
_, No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
Yes
` No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Requires! Records .K Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WUP, checklists.. design. maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergence situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
u No violations or deficiencies were noted duping this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Yes No
w Yes -' No
Yes I No
Yes `o No
Yes e No
Yes `i! No
Yes ck No
Yes _ No
Yes No
Yes -4i No
kw Yes I No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
4. Lagoon levels lowered significantly this spring. Good Job! 1
11. Slight overapplication on last pull of several land application events ranging from I lb. to 8 lbs.
17. & 22. Facility has individual permit - AW 1940001.
Planning to remove more solids from lagoon #1.
19. All land application events maintained for all tracts of land on IRR-2 forms. IRR-2 forms complete with nitrogen balance. Current
waste analysis. Records well maintained.
you have any questions about this inspection_ please contact me at [phone] _ ext. 321.
J
Reviewer/inspector Name Daphne B. Cullom
Reviewer/Inspector Sianature: C S-
�} 0 -_A�_ Date: 6- 7-- q 9

Facility Number 94 1
Registered Q Certified 0 Applied for Permit M Permitted
ow -up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 12/6/9g
Time of Inspection E� 24 hr. (Ith:mm)
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: Karurine.ERrm............................................................................................. County: W..ashingtan..................................... WaRO........
Owner Name: ................................................... Tyaout Fttads.Luc.................................... Phone No: 79.7.-..4123 ...................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 3.47.5hocc.M ivx................................................................................... CJMIWCYJ.NC .......................................................... 27.925..............
Onsite Representative: SEE.CAlY1ME1!PI.SEG71A1Y.............................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: Ernest ..................................... F.onward........................................ ... Operator Certification Number: .18212 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =• =' =- Longitude =• =' ="
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify D WQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify D WQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 44-1 Date of Inspection 1216198
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holdina Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):............................................................................................................................................. ...........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes © No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes © No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
IS. Crop type.................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/hispector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25_ Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
.......................................................
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
:1 No_.,yokiln is•visit.' You wf-rpteive tb farther - • -
q
- av>erespondence abiout this. visati• - - . _ . - . _ ... • . • . • . • . • ..... ............... . .. .
Operation under an Individual Permit and not subject to a Soil & Water Operation Review at this time
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes © No
❑ Yes © No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
M.
ReviewerlIns ectorName - et At 13t ......... :..... '
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Date sent: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 08:04:14 -0600
From: "Fleming, Jimmy" <FLEMINGJ [e-mail]>
Subject: Lagoon Gauge Poles?
To: "'Cullom, Daphne"' <daphne [e-mail]>
Copies to: "Queen, Earl" <QueenE [e-mail]>
Hello Daphne,
Sony I didn't get to speak with you in Edenton the other day: I have a
question about lagoon gauge poles. When I installed the poles at Newlands I
thought I understood the freeboard + 25 year/24 hour range should be 24
inches even though the literature stated 12" + 7" for a total of 19". At
the meeting Tuesday, I heard several times that the range was still 19" for
our area. I want to put new gauge poles at our Northline lagoons but I need
confirmation as to what the freeboard/storm event range should be. Could
you shed some light on this for me ... the 5" inch difference between 19"
and 24" means quite a lot to our storage capacity.
Thanks for your help,
Jimmy Fleming
Production Manager
N.C. PORK GROUP
1-252-797-4123
Daphne Cullom -- 1 -- Fri, 19 Feb 1999 09.49:38

State of North Carolina j
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr_, P.E., Director
January 21, 1999
Mr. Jimmy Fisher
Northline Farm/The Pork Group
347 Shore Drive
Creswell, NC 27928
SUBJECT: Animal FeedlottOperation Site Inspection
Northline Farm/The Pork Group
Facility No. #94-1
Washington County
Dear Mr. Fisher:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection (as it is
viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility by the Division of Water
Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the
State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being
kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any
questions, please contact me at 919/946-6481, ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely,
41. 4X 44'�
Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: LBH files
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Facility Number Date of Inspection r
Time of Inspection 1 ] 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 0 Not Opera#Iona Date Last Operated:'
Farm Name: 'Northline.Farm..._....................................... .... .................. ... County: Washington WaRO
Owner Name: .................................... .. . ........ lyson.Fiaods.Ine .................................... Phone No: 252-.7.9.7..412J.............. ............................................
Facility Contact: JimnLy Faster..................................................Title: P.raftctintx Manager ................. Phone No: &Of ,3SG:4599.(bxeper)....
Mailing Address: 34.7..Sbuire ITrixe............................................................................... ICres.WellC.
................ ............ ............................ 27918 ..............
Onsite Representaiive: JimmyXaster............................................................................. Integrator :.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: Ernest .................................... FArwzrd ........................................... Operator Certification Number: Ili,212............................
Location of Farm:
4.
Latitude =• 6 44 Longitude Q• & �64
o a_ esign
r urren' = es�gnl urren m< esagnt urren
-� -23.
-fir
&.-.i 4j :. -_ ��w r,, .. -Y ..�-i'
Z rr� Ca act Po ulatton Poultry �Ca act .�1'o ulatiop :Cattle Ca aci Po ulatton
P t3'p� p
�Swtne r F
-
�r �gp�
#
54,000
;
r
:Capacity s
,
tital SSLW 9,450,0
� p u sur ace rams resent [3 agoon rea 13 pray ie rea------------
Eil
p o tqut aste anagement ystel
1 '§.,.
m Wes- .- i�es3eT.+- �
�....x. � � �
�ee
-
-
_ can to er
�
p Layer
® ee er to arts
�
w
p Non -Layer
arrow to Weo an=�-
arrow to Feeder
-
�
p�� Other
Farrow to
p
`
e '
--
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes N No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes R No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes g No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance7improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97 Continued on back

8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (La2oons,Holding_Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity( eeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure a Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):.............2-U..........................1..92......................-...2.0..................................;..
I0. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
N No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed9 j
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the,structures need maintenance/improvement? '
p Yes
R No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
1
15. Crop type ...... Cam.(5ilage.& Grain)........ Steal1.Grai'n�.4.W��2=t Barky.................... Szybeau.........................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Antm)al Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
® No
17, Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
Cl Yes
® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
Ig No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
® No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
® No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
® No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
® Yes
p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities OnFv
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
® No
• 'o:v 6 t ohS-O•i' .e 4cieittiOs'Were•tk4dte dr rjgt this sit. btt , fecti*6it ttt er -
:: ro�cespandeace a[rout s visit:... .. : '
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y Date:

ME
.I
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
January 2, 1998
Mr. Joe Locke
Northline Farm/The Pork Group
347 Shore Drive
Creswell, North Carolina 27928
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Northline Farm/The Pork Group
Facility No. #94- l
Washington County
Dear Mr. Locke:
On August 26, 1997, Daphne Cullom and I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the
reference facility and the inspection report is enclosed for your reference. This report reflects the
information that was entered into the Division database and is shared with the Division of Soil and Water
and the County's NRCS office.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules IS NCAC 2H.0217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
Please review this report and correct all deficiencies that were described, if any, in the commend section of
this report. It should also be noted that the responsible parry should consider any recommendations that
were made and make appropriate adjustments. For operational and technical assistance, it is suggested to
please contact your Technical Specialist.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions pertaining to
the inspection, please contact me at 919/946-6481, ext. 318.
Sincerely,
Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: W hington Co. NRCS Office
,]J�aRO

11
16 r[outine p t-ompianu p rouow-up of uwtl inspection p roiiow-up of uawL review p vtner I
Facility Number
2 Registered p Certified 0 Applied for Permit p Permitted
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Nortbli e.F.arin.................... ............................. County: Washington WaRO
OwnerName: .... . ............... ............................. 1he.Fnrk.Graup ................................... Phone No: 79.7.4123 ....................................................................
Facility Contact:Jorlacke.........................................................Title: Regiaual.lf4anager........................ Phone No:...................................... ..............
Mailing Address: 34.7..ShoreDrixe................................................................................... cresweU.NC ........................................................... 279211..............
Onsite Representative: dne.1.ackit.................................................................................... Integrator:ThtP.orkGrottpt...................................................
Certified Operator:Erittesi.................................... F.nrymrd........................................... Operator Certification Number: l$212.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®° ® Longitude ©•
Swine Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finis
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finis
Gilts
Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
Layer Dairy
Non -Layer on- atry
1p er
Total Design Capacity 70,000
.Total SSLW ,
Number of Lagoons LHolding Ponds Subsurface Drains resenIFEagoonATea 13pray ie rea
o iqut Waste Management System
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon 13 Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) 17 Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) l7 Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there.any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require © Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7M/97
1W

[Facility Number: 94_1
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 2.5 2.5 3.0
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
IL Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes p No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes ® No
Waste Application
14. is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes ® No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....... Corn.(Silage.&. Grain)--......Stnall.GraiTLk.V .Beat Bar1gy.................... s aybeaus..............................-----..----.--------.--------------.--------..---
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated m the' Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
o,vta!tions.or erencies:were.note -during , t• rs visit... Yon;VRII receive ntr further. .
: �eT`1C.....e....... t.. •visit:: :.. • ..---------------
:.. • . • ... : - - . - - ' • .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
e is IRyhas changed their name to "llhe Pork Group. Presently, this taciltty is waiting tor.an-indtvidual permit.
is &61#yis geared to produced 90,000 finishing animals in 118 houses (pithouse Lind flush houses) in Washington County.
1TE: "Ilic farrow to feeder operation is -in Tyrrell County. The unique thing about this operation is that_lbe`Pork Group only
ns the animals'and the lagoons; the houses and land is owned by separate individuals (Mr. Al Aleyashil Mr.-Billy'Simpson, Mr.
bent Lewis and Mr. Willie hones). The facility has the capability to pump from the pithouses instead
,of from the lagoons.
►WMP onsite at the main office.
Ee of the three lagoons has an abundance amount of solids and micros have been injected into the lagoon to reduce the solids.
is office would like to revisit this operation to better understand the comradary of the waste management system.
7/25/97
Reviewer/inspector NamevA
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �: "�-

aci t um er: 94.-1 Date of Inspection
s12-.5everai.t�are spots noted on Without a -
cover on`the dike wall (inside,'an and"down past the toed �tlze integrity of the striictuie can be compromised" due to erosion,
rfie lagoon area should be -kept mowed or otherwise controlledand accessible inside; onand "down past the -toe of the dike wall
y 8ularl.. _
e following'items are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan�and are some conditions oftlie`permit therefor
these items »be implemented: - _ �• _ _• • s
Keep lagoons/storage ponds free of foreWi ' deiiris including, but not limited to tires, bottles, plastic products,. light bulbs, gloves,
syringes or any other solids waste. _
Pipes discharging wastes into the lagoon should be.extended beneath the surface of the lagoon to avoid releasing gases from
agitated wastes.
The lagoon area should be kept mowed or otherwise controlled and accessible. liigh-grass does not allow you to conduct a
orough inspection of the lagoon area for seepage, rodent damage, etc.
- An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at
east within 60 days (before or after) of the date of applica_tion.' 'This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
osphorus, Zinc and Copper. _N
-Soil analysis is required annually _
All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet can b
other vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabili ation structure, or other suitable outlets.
It is suggested to keep crop yield information'for future use to update your waste management plan. You will need three years of
61 up yield data before your plan can be updated. _
Upon receiving your permit, read through it completely and if you have any questions; contact me at 919/946-6481, en 319.
�•
max..
.. � _
• .. - - _� . _.
.. �..Y -

L if
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. Joe E. Locke
Tyson Foods, Inc- Northline Farm
347 Shore Drive
Creswell, NC 27928
Dear Mr. Locke:
MAI
HIM
ID E N R
January 13, 1998 wasNrVGTD"V oFFtce
JAN 1 6 1998
A E M.
Subject: Application No. AW1940001
Additional Information Request
Northline Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Washington County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the
following by February 12, 1998:
1) The nitrogen balance was based on samples taken from the existing lagoons. The analytical
data were included with the permit application, however no correlation between the sample
numbers shown on the test report and the location at which the samples were withdrawn
were provided. Please submit a legend correlating the sample numbers and the locations at
which the samples were taken.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information.
Please submit four (4) copies of all information to my attention at the address below. Also, please note
that failure to provide this additional information on or before February 12. 1998 will subject your
application to being returned as incomplete, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0208.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 362.
Sincerely,
rV1
Michael T. Lewandowski
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Washington Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
William Raybon. Rabon Engineering
P.O. Sox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

J Site Requires Immediate Attention: -/J_
Facility No. _ IR 4
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: Z O - 1995
Time: jAc)cz
Farm Name/Owner: Ceuaoa nJ,a _rV.(oAJ�-
Mailing Address:
County: W AS N , A! C Tn .J
Integrator, iy s,4 "i _ _ _ _ Phone:
On Site Representative: E aAjii_r Phone: _ 797-412-3
Physical Address/Location: Al Cs A _ 1 / 111 _ ^
Type of Operation: Swine ze Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: _ 7(out o Number of Animals on Site: 76 0 0-%:)
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. _S:� Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No .
Is adequate land available for spray? (�r No Is the cover crop adequate? (iZ_alor No
Crop(s) being utilized: Ro,..1 CA0.0-c Z 7owo c_&�
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 4jDbr No
100 Feet from Wells? �e or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or iP
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or � If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, Iand applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? (_G6r No
Additional Comments:
-_CWJ..1 f W10 vz c s W%Lkkf 7of[ /fcGd ro.� rr
/►LorL� K�-J��./�
7� - �ti✓K�,a-ram
Inspector Name
4kyl- �
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. G`4�Qi
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS ITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: 1995
Time; �]
Farm Name/owner: �ijo
Mailing Address: `
County:
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: S ill -(a
Type cf operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
De=_,cZ Canacity: No. of Animals on Site:
DEM certification No.: ACE BEM C �i ication No.: ACNEW
Latitude:_- Longitude:flrb Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (apnroximately.l Ft + 7 in) Yes or No
Actual Freeboard: Ft Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No
Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crops) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? Yes or No 100 Ft from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stre.m?
Yes or No
Is anirnal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft cf a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing
s_iste:-, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or Ho
If Yes, please exnlain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste manacement records (volumes of manure,
land a,_lied, spray irrigated on specific e witcover crop)? Yes or No z�'
1'171 C
inezec_sr Name Sianature
cc: Facili_y Assessment Unit
Comments S Sketch on Back of Sheet

n roMd
o w
N ['7
m
N �
rr O to
:Do
H
H
0
z
r
n
0

State of forth Carolina
Department of Environment, Health,- and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street w Raleigh, North Carolina 27504_-
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Division of Environmental Management
January 21, 1993
Mr. Mike Noles
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Rt. 1, Box 200
Creswell, North Carolina 27928
Subject: Compliance Inspection.
Tyson Carolina, Inc. Swine Operation
Tyrrell & Washington Counties
Dear Mr. Noles:
Please find enclosed is a copy of the inspection report that is on
file in our office. If you should have further questions concerning
the above, please do not hesitate to call either Scott Jones or
myself.
Sincerely.
"a44
Robert Tankard
Environmental Engineer
f PC).PC).Box 77687. {2 dgh, North Carolina 2761(7667 Telephone [phone] Fax = 919-733-0513
An Equal Opportunity Affinnarive Action Employer

Division of Environmental Management
December 9, 1992
TO: CAFO File
Washington Region 1 Office
FROM: Scott Jones
Environmental Technician, WARO
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Tyson Carolina, Inc. Swine Operation
Tyrrell & Washington Counties
On October 16 and November 4, 1992, Scott Jones and Robert Tankard,
DEM Staff of the Washington Regional Office, visited the Tyson
Carolina Inc. Swine Operations in Washington and Tyrrell Counties
respectively. The purpose of this visit was to determine whether
or not the aforementioned facility was in compliance with its CAFO
Designation effective February 8, 1989.
As a result of this inspection it has been found that the Tyson
Carolina Inc. Swine Operation was in compliance at the time of
inspection.
At the time of inspections there was no sign of discharges from
either facility. The combined total farm site for Tyson includes
over 14,000 acres. Both operations utilize centralized collection
points for the waste which is then pumped under pressure to
hydrants located at strategic points on the farms. From this point
tractors on -load waste and land apply. Mr. Mike Noles is the
regional manager for Tyson and was contacted prior to the visits.
According to Mr. Noles, Cargill is in the process purchasing this
farm from Tyson.
msj/REVISIT/TYSON
921209

Mr. Jim Hicks
Page 2
the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 11666,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. A copy of the Petition
should be filed with this office.
If you do not request an administrative hearing, this
Designation will become final in thirty (30) days.
Sincerely, '
i9pIGljiAL SIGNED use
R, PAUL MKS'
R. Paul Wilms
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Jim Muliiga

tJa�1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
June 16, 1988
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chuck Wakild, Chief
Water Quality Section
THROUGH: #'-im MulligaA, Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
THROUGH: Roger K. Thorpe, Watet Quality Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
FROM: Dick Denton, Environmental Techn3'^*an
Water Quality Section, WaRO 4o s 6��-z
SUBJECT: Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation
Tyson Carolina Inc; Swine Farm
Washington & Tyrrell Counties
INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this memo is to request that Tyson
Carolina Inc, swine facility located in Washington and
Tyrrell Counties be designated as a Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operation. A summary of the investigation conducted
on 5/19/88 by Dick Denton, DEM, is enclosed as follows:

t
Animal Operations Inspection Form
Date of Inspection:
May 19, 1988
Name of Owner of Property:
Office)
Tyson Carolina Inc.
Name of Operator:
(Check Register of Deeds or Tax
Tyson Carolina Inc.; Mr. Jim Hicks is the Registered
Agent
Address:
Rt. 1, Box 200
Creswell, North Carolina
Phone Number:
919/797-4123
Description of Facility Location (State Road No.'s, etc.):
The facility's main office is located on SR 1183 near
the terminus of SR 1126 and SR 1183. The company has
animal operations at two different sites; one in
Tyrrell County; one in Washington County.
The Tyrrell County site is located near the terminus of
SR 1105 and Phelps Road.
The Washington County site.is located near the main
office and off SR 1126. Enclosed is a map to further
identify the location of each site.
Type of Operation (Examples: farrow to finish, topping,
dairy, swine, cattle, chickens -layers or broilers, turkey
production, etc.):
Tyson Carolina is a farrow to finish operation.
Number and Type of Animals or Animal Units:
Total number of animals for both sites is as follows:
I. sows 17,500
2. boars 3,000
3. feeder pigs (less than 55 Lbs) 52,500
4. topping hogs 72,800

x
1
Length of Time Animals Have been, Are, or Will Be Stabled,
or Confined and Fed or Maintained in -Any 12 Month Period.
Greater than 45 days during any 12-month period
Are Crops, Vegetation Forage Growth, or Post -Harvest
Residues Sustained in the Normal Growing Season over Any
Portion of the Lot or Facility?
The swine are contained in animal house.
Description of Other Animal Operations in Immediate Vicinity
or Proximity to Same or Other Surface Waters:
There are several small swine operations located within
a 10-mile radius of Tyson Carolina facilities.
Proximity of Facility to Neighboring Houses, Wells, etc.:
Tyson Carolina facilities are located in a fairly
remote area of Washington and Tyrrell Counties. The
majority of the few residents in the immediate area of
the swine facilities are Tyson Carolina employees. The
nearest homes and wells are located within 500 yards of
a site.
Approximate Depth of Groundwater Table in- the Area of the
Facility or Discharge:
The groundwater table in this area has been altered by
extensive ditching and pumping stations for agricultural
operations. The seasonal high water table may vary
from ± 2 feet and + 4 feet below ground surface.
Proximity of Facility to Surface Waters (provide name and
class -of surface waters):
Both Washington and Tyrrell counties' sites are located
in agricultural areas that have been extensively
ditched to facilitate drainage. The drainage ditches
eventually flow into the Scuppernong River- and its
tributaries.
Are Pollutants Discharged into the Waters of the State? If
so, How? (directly or by man-made ditch, flushing system, or
other similar man-made device):
At the time of the inspection, there was no evidence to
suggest that the operations were directly discharging
animal waste to the surface waters of the state.

Do or Have Discharges Occurred in Response to a Storm Event
of Less Than a 25--year, 24-hour Intensity? (If yes, include
a brief listing of incidents and suspected causes.):
No evidence was found to indicate that discharges occur
due to storm events. However it was noted that the
lagoon walls on the larger lagoon in Washington County
are losing their structural integrity. The walls have
been eroded by wind -driven wave action, and have become
""spongy"" in some areas.
Type of 'Waste Management (Examples: type of confinement -
free stall barns, sheltered or limited shelter dirt lots,
paved or dirt open lots, swine houses, pasture; type of
waste handling --direct spreading in solid form, slotted floor
with lagoon or pit, single or multi -cell lagoon, aerated
lagoon, land application of liquid manure, spray irrigation,
contractor disposal, etc.)
All animal houses are slatted floors over pits. The
pits are -pumped to a lagoon, spray truck, or directly
onto a field through an elaborate system of underground
piping and quick --connect hydrants. Tyson Carolina
recycles the animal waste as fertilizer onto farm land
owned by them and leased by local farmers.
Condition of Waste Management Facility (rate as poor -good,
no discharge, sufficient freeboard in lagoon, etc. Include
weather conditions during inspection.)
In general the total waste management program at Tyson
Carolina is rated as good with only a few minor
exceptions. Those exceptions are as follows:
(1) Spongy lagoon walls on the largest lagoon.
(2) It appears that the company does not cut the grass
around the Lagoon and its walls. When grass and
weeds are allowed to grow out of control, one
cannot visually inspect the lagoon walls for
damage that may be occurring, i.e., erosion and
burrowing animals.
Animal Waste Discharge (including photos and witness' names,
addressed, telephone numbers and statements of fact).
A small discharge from the largest lagoon was noted;
however, there was no evidence that it had actually
reached the surface waters of the State..

Water Quality Assessment: (include description of sampling,
field measurements, visual. observations and slope and vege-
tative cover of land adjacent to water, extent of rainfall
and other factors relative to the likelihood or frequency of
discharge of animal wastes and process wastewaters)
The inspector did not see any evidence of a discharge
from the operations, and therefore did not take samples
or field measurements.
Recommendations Made to Owner/Operator:
The writer recommended that the company take action to
correct the deficiencies noted with respect the "spongy
lagoon walls."
Recommendations for Further DEN Action: (Re -inspect,
designate, etc.)
The.writer recommends that Tyson Carolina be designated
as a Concentrated Animal. Feeding Operating based solely
on the size and number of animals -confined by this
facility.
Other Comments:

xj� o
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor R. Paul Wilms
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
Mr. Jim Hicks, General Manager
Tyson Carolina Inc.
Rt. 1, Box 200
Creswell, North Carolina 27928
SUBJECT: Designation of Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operation
Tyson Carolina Inc. Swine Farm
Washington & Tyrrell Counties
Dear Mr. Hicks:
This letter is to notify you that the Tyson Carolina Inc.
Swine Farm, is hereby designated a concentrated animal
feeding operation in accordance with Title 15, North
Carolina Administrative Code 2H .0123, and adopted Federal
Regulations 40 CFR 122.23. The designation of your swine
facility was based on an inspection conducted on May 19,
1988, by members of the staff of the Washington Regional
Office. This inspection showed that you had established a
concentrated animal feeding operation requiring such
designation based on the following facts:
The facility has more than 2,500 swine, each weighing
over 25 kilograms (approximately 55 lbs.)
if you need advice or technical assistance with regard
to managing animal waste, you should contact your county
extension chairman or North Carolina State University's
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at
[phone].
If you wish to contest this Designation, you must
request an administrative hearing within thirty (30) days of
your receipt of this Notice. This request must be in the
form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of
P.O Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 2761E-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Fmp1 yer

{
Mr. Jim Hicks.
Page 2
the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 11666,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. A copy of the Petition
should be filed with this office.
If you do not request an administrative hearing, this
Designation will become final in thirty (30) days.
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Jim Mulligan
Sincerely,
R. Paul Wilms

\',` el s 44, .7
Animal Operations Inspection Form
Date of Inspection: /� V
Name of Owner of Property:(Check Register of Deeds or Tax
Office) -�
Name of Operator:
Address:
Phone Number:
Description of Facility Location (State Road No.•s, etc.):
Type of Operation (Examples: farrow to finish, topping,
dairy, swine, cattle, chickens -layers or broilers, turkey
production, etc.):
Number and Type of Animals or Animal Units:
Length of Time Animals Have Been, Are, or Will Be Stabled, or
Confined and Fed or Maintained in Any 12 Month Period.
Are Crops, Vegetation Forage Growth, or Post -Harvest
Sustained in the Normal Growing Season Over Any Potion _of.
the Lot or Facility?
t

off' n` z u ood
91 � 77/ o:: a/
V. 4--,�� (---7(2 - oos
.S �
07 �
sir a�S✓s �'� � ^- a.�3 � � 4� tcl �YI� � �� � � J�'?i l
V
-c

Description of Other Animal Operations in Immediate Vicinity
and Proximity to Same or Other Surface Waters:
Proximity of Facility to Neighboring Houses, Wells, etc.:
Approximate Depth of Groundwater Table in the Area of the
Facility or Discharge:
Proximity of Facility�to Surface Waters (provide name and
class of surface waters):
Are Pollutants Discharged into the Waters of the State? If
so, How? (directly or by man-made ditch, flushing system, or
other similar man-made device) -
Do or Have Discharges Occurred in Response to a Storm Event
of Less Than'a 25-year, 24-hour Intensity? (If yesp include
a brief listing of incidents and suspected causes.):
Type of Waste Management (Examplest.type of confinement=free`i�
stall barns, sheltered or limitedshelter dirt' _lots,.;;.payed= or.:
dirt open lots, swine houses, pasture; type of -waste
handling -direct spreading in solid form, slotted floor with
lagoon.,or pit, single or multi -cell 'lagoon, aerated lagoon,-...-.
land,application-of liquid manure, spray irrigation,
contractor disposal, etc.)
r

Condition of Waste Management Facility (rate as poor -good, no
discharge, sufficient -freeboard in lagoon, etc. Include
weather conditions during inspection.)
Animal Waste Discharge (including photos and witness' names,
addresses, telephones numbers and statements of fact).
Water Quality Assessment: (Include description of sampling,
-field measurements, visual observations and slope and
vegetative cover of land adjacent to water, extent of
rainfall and other factors relative to the likelihood or.
frequency of discharge of animal wastes and process: -
wastewaters)

Recommendations Made to Owner/Operator: '
Recommendations for Further DEM Action: (Re -inspect,
designate, etc.)
Other Comments:
e

rAl
SAM
A