20190133 Ver 2_401 Application_20190604

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?
r Yes r No
ID#*
20190133
Version* 2
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:*
Select Reviewing Office:*
Submittal Type:*
401 Application
Zan Price:eads\gaprice
Asheville Regional Office - [phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: r New Project
r Pre -Application Submittal
r More Information Response
r Other Agency Comments
r For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Project Contact Information
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Name: Josh Houde
Who is subrritting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
........................................................................................................................................
Project Name: 605 US 70 HWY E
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Buncombe
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
11810 -PCN Submittal-2019-05-28.pdf 2.18MB
Only pdf or lQm files are accepted.
Describe the attachments:
Revised PCN form and updated engineered drawings
V By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes

(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.

C oc
civil
[]e:5,ian
_
�6
Transmittal
Date: May 281h, 2019
Project Name: 605 Old US 70 Hwy E
CDC Project: 11810
To: NC DWQ, WBSCP Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Via: Mail X Overnight _ Hand Delivered , Pick up @ CDC Office
...... Copies Date Description
------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------
1 05/28/2019 PCN — Signed
•--------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 05/28/2019 Supporting Documents Package
-------------------- -------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 05/28/2019 Stormwater Plan (11x17)
1 05/28/2019 Stormwater Plan (2406)
--- - - ----------------------------------
By: Josh Houde
S:`•.ACADII 1810Idocs\USACEQ019-05-171DWQ105-28-201912019-05-28-Transmittal- DWQ.docx
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5432, Asheville, NC 28813
168 Patton Avenue Asheville, NC 28801 52 Walnut Street — Suite 9, Waynesville, NC 28786
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

605 OLD US 70 HWY E
PCN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE
PREPARED FOR:
STELLER PROPERTIES, LLC
PO BOX 5474
AHSEVILLE, NC 28813
JOB NO. 11810
,LIPAMMAyLOXl6
ML: X-301
Civil
ocsign
WWALWFT07,� ,.WA,E0
Concepts, PiC7
+
1MLYNEBYILLF MC X07X6
F,aM� pmq�.u,o
MesasUrJ3Mk CM84
FAX100X)LXsi/B6
JOB NO. 11810

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
© Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
© 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e, Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes Q No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
605 Old US 70 Highway E
2b. County:
Buncombe
2c. Nearest municipality 1 town:
Buncombe County
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Steller Properties, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
5699/1361
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Steller Properties, LLC
3d. Street address:
PO Box 5474
3e. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28813
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Foran — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Greg Hoffman, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Civil Design Concepts, PA
5c. Street address:
168 Patton Avenue
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
5e. Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0629-27-3007
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.371 Longitude: -82.174
1c. Property size:
8.35 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Unnamed tributaries 1 & 2 to Swannanoa River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
French Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing Conditions include a small, abandoned building along grassland, wooded area, and a small intermittent stream. The land is currently unused.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,697
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to pipe the existing intermittent stream across the proposed private roads to serve a new residential subdivision.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project will use backhoes for trenching and filling. Dewatering and dikes will be utilized for construction of the stream pipes. Erosion
control measures will include silt fence, construction entrance, diversion ditches, and inlet control.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property 1
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Survey determined streams were present.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
OYes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Approved: Buncombe County Board of Adjustments, Buncombe County Planning Board, Black Mountain Water, Metropolitan
Sewerage District Allocation, NCDEQ Authorization to Construct. Awaiting approval for: Buncombe County Stormwater and Erosion
Control, MSDBC Non -discharge permit
6. Future Project Plans
6a. is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands © Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Culvert
No
404
0.005
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.005
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Unnamed Tributary
INT
DWQ
4
99
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
99
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
02
03
04
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled
Excavated
P1
P2
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
51. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6C.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
fie.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
6h. Total Buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
-Planting and permanent seeding measures as described on plan details.
-Class 3 concrete pipe as required per soil properties
-Minimum impact possible for proposed site conditions
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
-Stream dewatering prior to construction
-Construction of dikes prior to construction
-Construction entrance, silt fences, and diversion ditches
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type:
Type:
Type:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
1 13 Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes Q No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
66.4%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑x Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater will be conveyed using ditches, inlets, and pipes to bioretention cells on-site. Bioretention Cell A is undersized for the design storm (1 -year
24-hour per Buncombe County Stormwater Ordinance), so Bioretention Cell B is sized to account for the overflow from the design storm from
Bioretention Cell A.The effluent will drain to an unnamed tributary of the Swannanoa River.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Buncombe County
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government'sjurisdiction is thisproject?
Buncombe County
N Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes © No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
[]Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
HSessionLaw 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes X❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes © No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No future development is expected for the site.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The seeks a non -discharge through the Metropolita Sewerage District Buncombe County.
project permit n of
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes
El❑ N°
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
US Fish and Wildlife Service
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes Q No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Fishery Management Council
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes Q No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Preservation Society of Asheville and Buncombe County
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
A lica t/ gent's Printed Name
ntlAgent's Signature
Date
(Agee is valid only if an authorization
At2fll
the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
NRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Buncombe County,
North Carolina
December 21, 2018

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.govtwps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(hftps./loffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http:/A ww.nres.usda.govtwps/portal/nres/detaii/soils/contactusn
cid=nres 142p2_053951),
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
�A

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface................................................................................................................... 2
HowSoil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Buncombe County, North Carolina.................................................................
14
EdD—Edneyville-Chestnut complex, basin, 15 to 30 percent slopes,
stony.....................................................................................................
14
EdE—Edneyville-Chestnut complex, basin, 30 to 50 percent slopes,
stony.....................................................................................................16
EdF—Edneyville-Chestnut complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, stony ..........
18
EwC—Evard-Cowee complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony.....................21
EwD—Evard-Cowee complex, basin, 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony........
23
TaC—Tate loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes .....................................................
25
TaD—Tate loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes ...................................................
26
TpE—Toecane-Tusquitee complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very
bouldery................................................................................................
27
UhE—Udorthents-Urban land complex, 2 to 50 percent slopes..................28
References............................................................................................................
30
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
EI

35° 3779"N
35° 37 T N
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
a
Ix �
367B7D .� ':rili� 383780 9fli390 9�0 3934D}
3 �
Map Sc*: 1:3,290 fpr`, A on A pmtralt (W x 11") Sheet
�3 N 0 45 80 9B0 270
0 950 300 ®0 800
.p prq'Gdm: Web Wroator CamerooardkUtes: VOM M4 Edge tics: UfM Zone 17N W MM
9
35° 372rN
I
I
35° 37 T N

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Solis
Soil Map Unit Polygons
r Soil Map Unit Lines
0 Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Mier
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Custom Soil Resource Report
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
.� Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
10
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:12,000.
Waming: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Buncombe County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 23, 2011—Nov
28, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
11
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres In AOI
Percent of AOI
EdD
Edneyville-Chestnut complex,
0.3
1.3%
basin, 15 to 30 percent
slopes, stony
BE
Edneyville-Chestnut complex,
6.2
27.1%
basin, 30 to 50 percent
slopes, slony
EdF
Edneyville-Chestnut complex,
0.2
0.9%
50 to 95 percent slopes,
stony
EwC
Evard-Cowee complex, 8 to 15
0.5
2.3%
percent slopes, stony
EwD
Evard-Cowee complex, basin,
6.7
29.2%
15 to 30 percent slopes,
stony
Tac
Tate loam, 8 to 15 percent
4.7
20.5%
slopes
TaD
Tate loam, 15 to 30 percent
1.6
7,2%
slopes
TpE
Toecane-Tusquitee complex, 30
0.4
1.9%
to 50 percent slopes, very
bouldery
UhE
Udorthents-Urban land
2.2
9.6%
complex, 2 to 50 percent
slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
22.9
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Buncombe County, North Carolina
EdD—Edneyville-Chestnut complex, basin, 15 to 30 percent slopes,
stony
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vOy5
Elevation: 1,740 to 5,450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 65 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 124 to 200 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance
Map Unit Composition
Edneyville, basin, stony, and similar soils. 50 percent
Chestnut basin, stony, and similar soils: 35 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Edneyville, Basin, Stony
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, mountaintop, side slope,
crest
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material.• Residuum weathered from biotite gneiss that is affected by soil
creep in the upper solum
Typical profile
A - 0 to 5 inches: gravelly fine sandy loam
Bw - 5 to 31 inches: loam
C - 31 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0.1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
inlhr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available waterstorage in profile: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Chestnut, Basin, Stony
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, mountaintop, side slope,
crest
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from biotite gneiss that is affected by soil
creep in the upper solum
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: gravelly fine sandy loam
B - 7 to 35 inches: loam
Cr - 35 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments. 0.1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0,00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water fable: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Cowee, stony
Percent of map unit 8 percent
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Tate, stony
Percent of map unit 6 percent
Landform: Toes on coves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, base slope
Down,slope shape: Linear, concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: No
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Ashe, stony
Percent of map unit. 1 percent
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional).
crest
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Rock outcrop
Percent of map unit. 0 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Backslope, summit
Mountainflank, mountaintop, side slope,
EdE--Edneyville-Chestnut complex, basin, 30 to 50 percent slopes,
stony
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vOxr
Elevation: 1,350 to 5,780 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 77 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 142 to 219 days
Farmland classfflcation: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Edneyville, basin, stony, and similar soils: 58 percent
Chestnut, basin, stony, and similar soils: 28 percent
Minor components: 14 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Edneyville, Basin, Stony
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, mountaintop, side slope,
crest
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from muscovite -biotite gneiss and/or biotite
gneiss that is affected by soil creep in the upper solum
Typical profile
A - 0 to 5 inches: gravelly fine sandy loam
Bw - 5 to 31 inches: loam
C - 31 to 80 inches: sandy loam
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 50 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0.1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in prorrle: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating. No
Description of Chestnut, Basin, Stony
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, mountaintop, side slope,
crest
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from muscovite -biotite gneiss and/or biotite
gneiss that is affected by soil creep in the upper solum
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: gravelly fine sandy loam
Bw - 7 to 35 inches: loam
Cr- 35 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 50 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0.1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): fie
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Porters, stony
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Tusquitee, very stony
Percent of map unit.- 4 percent
Landform: Toes on drainageways
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, base slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: No
%ecane, very stony
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: ❑rainageways
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, base slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydfic soil rating: No
Ashe, stony
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, mountaintop, side slope,
crest
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Rock outcrop
Percent of map unit: 0 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
EdF—Edneyville-Chestnut complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, stony
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vOxh
Elevation: 1,060 to 5,420 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 80 inches
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 100 to 205 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Edneyville, stony, and similar soils. 48 percent
Chestnut, stony, and similar soils: 37 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Edneyville, Stony
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from muscovite -biotite gneiss and/or biotite
gneiss that is affected by soil creep in the upper solum
Typical profile
A - 0 to 5 inches: gravelly fine sandy loam
Bw - 5 to 25 inches: loam
C - 25 to 80 inches: gravelly sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 50 to 95 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0.1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class. Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability class cation (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating. No
Description of Chestnut, Stony
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from muscovite -biotite gneiss and/or biotite
gneiss that is affected by soil creep in the upper solum
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
A - 0 to 3 inches: gravelly fine sandy loam
Bw - 3 to 28 inches: sandy loam
Cr- 28 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 50 to 95 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0.1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class. Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Cullasaja, very stony
Percent of map unit. 4 percent
Landform: Drainageways, rockfalls
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional)
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave, linear
Hydric soil rating. No
Tuckasegee, very stony
Percent of map unit• 4 percent
Landform: Toes on drainageways
Landform position (two-dimensional):
Landform position (three-dimensional).
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: No
Backslope
: Mountainflank, side slope
Footslope, backslope
Mountainflank, base slope
Porters, stony
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Ashe, stony
Percent of map unit. 2 percent
Landform: Mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainflank, side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Cleveland, very stony
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountainfiank, side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Rock outcrop
Percent of map unit. 0 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
EwC—Evard-Cowee complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1t3vx
Elevation: 2,400 to 3,200 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 80 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 124 to 176 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance
Map Unit Composition
Evans, stony, and similar soils: 55 percent
Cowee, stony, and similar soils: 25 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Evard, Stony
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountaintop, crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material., Residuum weathered from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 5 inches: loam
Bt - 5 to 32 inches: clay loam
BC - 32 to 45 inches: loam
C - 45 to 80 inches: sandy loam
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0.1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Cowee, Stony
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Mountaintop, crest
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 10 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 10 to 38 inches: clay loam
Cr- 38 to 80 inches: weathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksaf): Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classircation (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating. No
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
EwD—Evard-Cowee complex, basin, 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vx2d
Elevation: 1,480 to 4,070 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 54 inches
Mean annual air temperature. 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period. 159 to 176 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance
Map Unit Composition
Evard basin, stony, and similar soils: 60 percent
Cowee, basin, stony, and similar soils: 30 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Evard, Basin, Stony
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landfonn position (two-dimensional): Backslope, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Upper third of mountainflank, mountaintop,
side slope, crest
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Linear, convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from amphibolite and/or homblende gneiss
Typical profile
A - 0 to 5 inches. loam
Bt - 5 to 32 inches: clay loam
BC - 32 to 45 inches: loam
C - 45 to 80 inches. loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0.1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available waterstorage in profile: High (about 9.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydric soil rating. No
Description of Cowee, Basin, Stony
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Upper third of mountainflank, mountaintop,
side slope, crest
Down,slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Linear, convex
Parent material. Residuum weathered from amphibolite and/or hornblende gneiss
Typical profile
A - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam
Bt- 5 to 38 inches: gravelly clay loam
Cr - 38 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0.1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class. Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of Hooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating. No
Minor Components
Clifton
Percent of map unit. 7 percent
Landform: Ridges, hillslopes
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating. No
Tate
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Toes on coves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landforrm position (three-dimensional): Mountainbase, base slope
Down-slope shape: Concave, linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: No
24

Custom Soil Resource Report
TAC—Tate loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 1t3y7
Elevation: 2,050 to 3,200 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 50 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period- 124 to 170 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Tate and similar soils: 95 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunif.
Description of Tate
Setting
Landform: Coves, drainageways, fans
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Paraentmaterial: Colluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
AP - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bt - 7 to 46 inches: clay loam
C - 46 to 80 inches: cobbly loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class. Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
TaD—Tate loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1t3y9
Elevation: 2,050 to 3,200 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 50 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period: 124 to 170 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance
Map Unit Composition
Tate and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Tate
Setting
Landform: Coves, drainageways, fans
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Colluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
AP - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bt - 7 to 46 inches: clay loam
C - 46 to 80 inches: cobbly loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class. High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available waterstorage in profile: High (about 10.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
26

Custom Soil Resource Report
TpE—Toecane-Tusquitee complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very
bouldery
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1t3yl
Elevation: 2,400 to 4,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 54 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period. 100 to 150 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Toecane, very bouldery, and similar soils: 55 percent
Tusquitee, very bouldery, and similar soils: 35 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Toecane, Very Bouldery
Setting
Landform: Fans, coves, drainageways
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Cobbly and stony colluvium derived from igneous and
metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 8 inches: cobbly loam
Btl - 8 to 24 inches: very cobbly loam
Bt2 - 24 to 30 inches: very cobbly sandy loam
C - 30 to 80 inches: extremely cobbly loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 50 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 1.5 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
27

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Tusquitee, Very Bouldery
Setting
Landform: Coves, drainageways, fans
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material. Colluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 4 to 6 inches: gravelly loam
Bw - 8 to 48 inches: loam
C - 48 to 80 inches: gravelly fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 50 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 1.5 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class. Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
ME—Udorthents-Urban land complex, 2 to 50 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 1 t3z0
Elevation: 1,090 to 3,830 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 64 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free period. 124 to 176 days
Farmland classfcation: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Udorthents and similar soils: 55 percent
Urban land. 35 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
28

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Udorthents
Setting
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, footslope, toeslope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Loamy to skeletal cut and fill
Typical profile
C - 0 to 80 inches: cobbly sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 50 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 0.1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class. Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to very high
(0.00 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating. No
Description of Urban Land
Setting
Parent material. Streets, parking lots, buildings, and other structures
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8s
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Rubble land
Percent of map unit. 10 percent
Hydric soil rating. No
Rock outcrop
Percent of map unit: 0 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
29

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79131.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hunt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. hfp://www.nres.usda.govlwps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda. govlwps/portal/nres/detail/nationallsoilsl?cid=nres l42p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:l/
www. n ros. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/nationa I/soils/?cid=n res l 42p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http:/twww.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detaivsoils/
home/?cid=nres 142 p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http:l/www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
Kill

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http:/Avww.nres.usda.gov/wpstportal/
n resldetaillsoi lslscientists/?cid=nresl42p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http:l/www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portaVnres/detaiVnational/soils/?
cid=nresl 42p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:t/
www.nrcs,usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl42p2_052290.pdf
31

ELM U.S. OEFAIIII OF THE INTEMOR
U.5.0 OINCAL SURVEY
.n.wr.wrnnw
n-arz
anao• �E I m +ra
RAC( MOUNTAIN QUAOIIANRE
7USTopa"ra6
,rar em
� �rl:ri
/
': _
it l r f --� '` .,:.n i r"_a. {•u �/!'- ! ,I,,,r,r`..-'r^�—e�eToni
x'.;= r Y ,' .,rte
_ .w -,.Am,.. m
+'E s
I m - •r �
�� .,. �
� ..� >�E mr sm
i.r,ww q��wse rwo.orotld E,mw/
xuE::� am
m+w
�
��r�ram e-.�...w.:,
"P� ...w.
--- - �
.�..:�..
�'„Mw:.... o^ter•• � w a»
RACY MOIINTAIN, NC
301E

ALL DOWNSPOUT COLLECTOR PIPES SHALL BE HDPE WTH
SOLVENT WELD JOINTS, WYES, FITTINGS AND COUPUNGS AS
REQUIRED TO TIE-IN ALL DOWNSPOUT LEADERS AND ROOF
DRAINS FROM THE BUILDINGS. COLLECTOR PIPES SHALL HAVE 16"
COVER MINIMUM AND BE AT 1.0% MIN. SLOPE (TYP).
CONTRACTOR i0 COORDINATE CONNECTION LOCATION WTH
ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. (SEE DETAIL)
IIIIII ^'\I
/
�iI/II III II/// III I I
IIII II III III//// '\1 \ ` /7
//
f -
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
flln�l llhll11�1111 / vm / �) / v �� ss_
vv
I/II/II/// /////
IIII IIII � IIII
MI
III IIII IIIIII V I I \ ✓ / / � 1 - - - �--J 1 ���/ ,(1137 \\ \
EXISTING STREAM (TYP)
IIII I I I( \\ \ I,0
\\
EXISTING 30' STREAM BUFFER (TIP)
i
I)i
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE (TYP)
>52 1 ---III II III
B3 ------
ME
__=_1 III
A7- /( T
/II 1V IIIIII
I
-�
_ _ = 1 IIII/II'lllllll
- __ A6 \
\\ B2 -_ - /. PPPI 1 IIIIII
iA:. \
B1
250
/ �/ \\\\\\\\\'\\� % ` /2So �i , ^
AS
S& \
/ / / I
/�"/ // ///�/ -- -- A4 _ / �/� / / IIII PROPOSED WATER CROSSING
/Mb Z / / , / - / I (TW) (SEE PROFILES)
(.(/\
PROPOSED SEWER CROSSING
\\\�\IRR __', i iF( / /////�� / /Ifl (TYP)(SEE PROFILES)
C,0. /
///� PROPOSED STREAM CROSSING
K2 / / / // (TYP)
�go/ ° \- // I PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE (TV)
A2 T 1111
/ / i/ t ry I PROPOSED RIP RAP APRON 'A'
LENGTH: 0,
WIDTH AT FES: 30
i \
WIDTH AT END: 6'
_.
THICKNESS: e"
PROPOSED RIP RAP APRON 'B' ��- / / � / ___�__ _ �� � � _' _ \ / \ � STONE CLASS: B
LENGTH: 15' 1 / / / / / \ Al I (SEE DETAIL)
WIDTH AT FES: 39 \ \ / \ \,qy___ _ - \ \
WIDTH AT END: 10' I / \ / \ \ \
THICKNESS: 18" I /� \ �- -_ // I i \
STONE CLASS: B I \ / V - \ \ / PROPOSED BIO-RETEN A
TON CELL ""
I v / / J (SEE SHEET C943 FOR DETAILS
(SEE DETAIL) -_IT/
//II \y\ / 1�$♦3 �\ /%.' /\ / � III r '�� 1 � �� �_
S � ` 0
D2
L31
STRUCTURE TABLE
(INVERTS BASED ON 2D LENGTH TO INSIDE EDGES)
STRUCTURE
STATION
STRUCTURE DETAILS
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION
K1 I0+00 INV. IN 2469.4 (K1 -K2)
HEADWALL
RIM 2480.7
HEADWALL
[phone]
Al
10+29
INV. IN 2474.0 (A1 -A2)
7.2't
ROUND CURB INLET
ASHEVILLE, NC 28613
CONTACT:
INV. OUT 2473.5 (AO -A1)
[phone]
CML ENGINEER:
CML DESIGN CONCEPTS, P.A.
RIM 2485.5
168 PATTON AVENUE
A2
10+83
INV. IN 2481.7 (A2 -A3)
3.9'i
CURB INLET
SURVEYOR:
MCABEE & ASSOCIATES
INV. OUT 2481.6 (A1 -A2)
3 MCABEE TRAIL
FAIRVIEW, NO 28730
CONTACT:
RIM 2493.3
[phone]
A3
11+62
INV. IN 2489.6 (A3 -A4)
3.7't
CURB INLET
605 OLD US 70 HWY E
INV. OUT 2489.6 (A2 -A3)
DEED BOOK/PAGE:
5456/1361
SITE ACREAGE:
8.35 ACRES
RIM 2502.0
TOWNSHIP:
A4
12+43
NV. IN 2495.5 (A4 -A5)
INV. IN 2495.8 (A4 -B1)
6.6'Y
ROUND CURB INLET
FRONT:
10'
INV. OUT 2495.4 (A3 -A4)
7'
REAR:
15'
DISTURBED AREA:
RIM 2504.8
PROPOSED LOTS:
60 RESIDENTIAL UNIT PUD
A5
12+99
INV. IN 2496.2 (A5 -A6)
8.T±
JUNCTION BOX
7.0 UNITS/ACRE
EXISTING USE:
INV. OUT 2496.1 (A4 -A5)
PROPOSED USE:
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (PUO)
TOTAL PROPOSED ROADS:
2,006 LF
RIM 2500.7
Afi
13+93
INV. IN 2497.2 (AB -A7)
3.6't
CURB INLET
INV. OUT 2497.1 (AS -A6)
RIM 2501.1
A7
14+39
INV. IN 2497.7 (A7 -A8)
3.5'i
CURB INLET
INV. OUT 2497.6 (A6 -A7)
RIM 2515.2
A8
16+13
INV. IN 2511.7 (A8 -A9)
3.6'i
CURB INLET
INV. OUT 2511.6 (A7 -A8)
A9
16+66
RIM 2518.0
INV. OUT 2514.7 (A8 -A9)
3.3'i
CURB INLET
RIM 2512.0
81
11+05
INV. IN 2508.5 (81-82)
3.6'i
CURB INLET
INV. OUT 2508.4 (A4 -BI)
RIM 2514.3
82
11+38
INV. IN 2510.8 (132-133)
3.6'}
CURB INLET
INV. OUT 2510.7 (131-132)
RIM 2519.8
83
12+03
INV. IN 2516.5 (83-84)
3.4't
CURB INLET
INV. OUT 2516.4 (B2 -B3)
B4
13+38
RIM 2530.9
INV. GUT 2527.5 (B3 -B4)
3.4t
CURB INLET
D2
11+90
RIM 248fi.6
INV. OUT 2462.4 (Cl -12)
4.2'i
OPEN THROAT
EXISTING NERAND (TVP)
�i
- I ---
PROPOSED RIP RAP APRON 'A'
LENGTH: 10'
WDTH AT FES: 39
WIDTH AT END: V
THICKNESS: 18"
STONE CLASS: B
(SEE DETAIL)
PIPE TABLE
(SLOPES BASED ON 2D LENGTH TO INSIDE EDGES)
INLET/OUTLET TABLE
(INVERTS BASED ON 2D LENGTH i0 INSIDE EDGES)
STRUCTURESTATION STRUCTURE DETAILS
DESCRIPTION
AO 10+03 INV. IN 2473.3 (AO -AI)
FLARED END SECTION
D1 11+13 INV. IN 2462.0 (C1-C2)
FLARED END SECTION
K1 I0+00 INV. IN 2469.4 (K1 -K2)
HEADWALL
K2 10+99 INV. OUT 2478.2 (KI -K2)
HEADWALL
[phone]
DEVELOPER:
STELLER PROPERTIES, LLC
PROPOSED HEADWALL
P.O. BOX 5474
PROPOSED RIP -RAP APRON
ASHEVILLE, NC 28613
CONTACT:
CHRIS ELLER
[phone]
CML ENGINEER:
CML DESIGN CONCEPTS, P.A.
168 PATTON AVENUE
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROUNA 28801
CONTACT:
GREGORY HOFFMAN, P.E.
[phone]
SURVEYOR:
MCABEE & ASSOCIATES
3 MCABEE TRAIL
FAIRVIEW, NO 28730
CONTACT:
ERIC S. MCABEE, PLS
[phone]
PROJECT DATA
PIN:
0fi29-27-3007
ADDRESS:
605 OLD US 70 HWY E
BLACK MOUNTAIN, NC
DEED BOOK/PAGE:
5456/1361
SITE ACREAGE:
8.35 ACRES
ZONING:R-2
TOWNSHIP:
BLACK MOUNTAIN
LAT/LONG:
35.619, -82.290
SETBACKS:
FRONT:
10'
SIDES:
7'
REAR:
15'
DISTURBED AREA:
5.8 AC
PROPOSED LOTS:
60 RESIDENTIAL UNIT PUD
DENSITY SUMMARY:
ALLOWED:
7.2 UNITS/ACRE = 60.1 UNITS
PROPOSED:
7.0 UNITS/ACRE
EXISTING USE:
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED USE:
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (PUO)
TOTAL PROPOSED ROADS:
2,006 LF
INLET/OUTLET TABLE
(INVERTS BASED ON 2D LENGTH i0 INSIDE EDGES)
STRUCTURESTATION STRUCTURE DETAILS
DESCRIPTION
AO 10+03 INV. IN 2473.3 (AO -AI)
FLARED END SECTION
D1 11+13 INV. IN 2462.0 (C1-C2)
FLARED END SECTION
K1 I0+00 INV. IN 2469.4 (K1 -K2)
HEADWALL
K2 10+99 INV. OUT 2478.2 (KI -K2)
HEADWALL
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
DEVELOPMENT DATA
OWNER:
STELLER PROPERTIES, _LC
PROPOSED STORM PIPE •
P.O. BOX 5474
PROPOSED CURB INLET STRUCTURE
ASHEVILLE, NC 28613
CONTACT:
CHRIS ELLER
PROPOSED DETENTION STRUCTURE
[phone]
DEVELOPER:
STELLER PROPERTIES, LLC
PROPOSED HEADWALL
P.O. BOX 5474
PROPOSED RIP -RAP APRON
ASHEVILLE, NC 28613
CONTACT:
CHRIS ELLER
[phone]
CML ENGINEER:
CML DESIGN CONCEPTS, P.A.
168 PATTON AVENUE
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROUNA 28801
CONTACT:
GREGORY HOFFMAN, P.E.
[phone]
SURVEYOR:
MCABEE & ASSOCIATES
3 MCABEE TRAIL
FAIRVIEW, NO 28730
CONTACT:
ERIC S. MCABEE, PLS
[phone]
PROJECT DATA
PIN:
0fi29-27-3007
ADDRESS:
605 OLD US 70 HWY E
BLACK MOUNTAIN, NC
DEED BOOK/PAGE:
5456/1361
SITE ACREAGE:
8.35 ACRES
ZONING:R-2
TOWNSHIP:
BLACK MOUNTAIN
LAT/LONG:
35.619, -82.290
SETBACKS:
FRONT:
10'
SIDES:
7'
REAR:
15'
DISTURBED AREA:
5.8 AC
PROPOSED LOTS:
60 RESIDENTIAL UNIT PUD
DENSITY SUMMARY:
ALLOWED:
7.2 UNITS/ACRE = 60.1 UNITS
PROPOSED:
7.0 UNITS/ACRE
EXISTING USE:
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED USE:
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (PUO)
TOTAL PROPOSED ROADS:
2,006 LF
STORM LEGEND
EXISTING STORM PIPE
_ _ - _ _
PROPOSED STORM PIPE •
- - - - - - -
PROPOSED CURB INLET STRUCTURE
o
PROPOSED JUNCTION BOX
C
PROPOSED DETENTION STRUCTURE
r.
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION
1
PROPOSED HEADWALL
r
PROPOSED RIP -RAP APRON
W
2
O
- O
Know what's below. 0
Call before you dig. NORTH
STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
GRAPHIC SCALE
25
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 ft.
DRAWN GV'. CLR
CDC PROJECT No.: 11810
MSD PROJECT NO.: 201809]
SHEET
C401