400065_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA �
Department of Environmental Qua'

F,t _�yy;._,y- J•'--_ -_ �.�, Vic- __
�i -n sue,
�� rt � � _
�� � � - ��� sir � � �� � � •�

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service
0 Soil and Water Conservation District
0 Other...
Facility Number 40 - 65 Date: 12/4103 Time: 1 1500 Time On Farm: 30 WARO
Farm Name Ralph Noble Farm County Greene
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 5155 Highway 903 North Snow Hill NC 28580
Onsite
Representative Wayne nobles granted permission to enter farm Integrator inde endent .
TyRe Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
® No Animals -Date Last Operated: 2/20/02
❑ Operating below threshold
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder.
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
2200
o
OO Routine
O Response to DWQIDENR referral
O Response to DSWCISWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ❑ no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ❑ no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 15
CROP TYPES
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ❑ no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ❑ no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 15
CROP TYPES
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 65 Date:
12/4103
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
[19. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
® 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
El 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
28• For Need (list in comment section)
❑
El
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
[114, Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 21-1.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
N 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
[120. Latelmissing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Regulatou Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
❑ Other...
43. Irrigation system desigNinstallation
❑
El
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45.Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.) ,
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable. Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationfrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
5o. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
El❑
5'
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - $5 Date: 1214103
MENTS:
*This inspection serves as conformation that no animals are on site. Owner wants to complete Request for Removal.
Conformation of Removal will be issued when this is complete.
11. Lagoon level is recorded at 15". At time of this inspection, DWQ had not been notified. Permit requires facility to notify
DWQ when lagoon freeboard level is < 19 ".
"There have been no irrigation events since last DSWC inspection for 2002.
*Make records available for 3 years.
19. Missing weekly lagoon freeboard levels. Permit requires lagoon level to be recorded weekly.
Coastal bermuda pasture has been over seeded. Wheat to be planted as soil and weather conditions permit.
*Need to lower lagoon as soil and weather conditions permit. Follow guidance from waste plan.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin McLawhom
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 12/5/03
Entered By: IMartin McLawhorn
3 03/10/03

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph-D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullomli;�CAVI---�
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility
by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it with all other
documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the
farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented
:-
(p The maximum waste level in lagoonststorage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste
level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm
event plus an additional foot of st ucturA freeboard
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
q) Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
q) The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation records.
These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available
Nitrogen (PA rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any given application.
q) All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is suagesta not a requirement- to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-6481, ext..
321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: ✓(aRO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-Ml (Telephone) 252-946r9215 (Fax)

of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *O routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
- F : flit Number Da
te of Visit: 121ISC2002 Time: 2:16 PM
ac v
r0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
93 Permitted M Certified M Conditionally Certified 50 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold : .........................
Farm Name: RAluhAaW F.azloa........................... ............ Connty:.G rote...................................._...... WAR,.A.......
OwnerName: Ralph ..... ............ _................... Nohk........ ............................................ Phone No: 252=2,85-3.?2.3.......... ..... ............................... .... ...
Mailing Address: 515S.Highwa4y_903-North................................................................ SAMIM C................-----...........-_...............---- 285BO .............
FacilityContact: ...............»........................................»...» . Y itle:.............».._.......»..»»...................... Phone No: ........ ...................... .... ...........
Onsite Representative: WatYnENobk.................... .....---......._........ Integrator: ]l uMhy.-Fand7y.F.arm....................
Certified Operator: Ralph...W .............................. Liable ........ ........................ ....... ...... . Operator Certification Number: .16,630 ......... ....................
Location of Farm:
On road No. 1402 from 123 to 903 sign side of road. +
I�
® Swine [3 Poultry ❑ Cattle [I Horse Latitude 't 35 j ° 28 i� 32 5� Longitude77 ' — � 23 �°
Des'
ign
Current ; : De9i gn Current :.
:Design - ' Current:
Swine :. Ca aci
Po ulation� Poultry . .: Ca ac' Po ttlafon Cattle
':Capacity' Po ulatioi,
❑ Wean to Feeder
10
Laver
:'
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
2200
0
I0Nan-Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
[I Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
tither
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,200
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW .
297,000
JE] Boars
Number of Lagoons
1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Trays:,.
No Liquid Waste Management System
D!,wir3rges & Strewn In, r_cts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon D Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notii}, DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
171 Yes 0 No
r Yes 0 No
[I Yes ® No
[I Yes ❑ No
C1 Yes 9 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? G Yes 5A No
Waste Colkecthm she Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway [ Yes 9 No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure: 4 StructUle 5 Structure 6
identifier: .............. ...... .............................
26

V.NVJ/Vt
Facility Number. 40-65 Date of inspection 12/18/2042
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 0 Yes 9 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there strictures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? [I Yes C@ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the shvotnres need maintenance/impravement? ❑ Yes 0 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any strictures lack adequate, ganged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? [l Yes ® No
Waste ppiiea#it�r
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
I I - Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [21 Yes [3No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
0 Yes
[] No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
® Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
© No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
;Yes
0 No
Re'tialre l Rectortli & Ducuincnts
17. Fain to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
[I Yes
0 No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design maps, etc.)
iE] Yes
E] No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
© Yes
J No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(te/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
F1 Yes
J No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
[I Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 0 Yes [¢ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments- ref r to QE "fi6n . - ( q - , #}. Explain. any YES answers and/or any _recommendations or and other'comments
Use drawings of fac�ity to better,ezplam situations (use additional pages as necessary): ("j Meld Copv_° ❑ Final Notes
This facility is not operational. No animals have been on site since 2/2002. The buildings on site are being used for storage. Mr. Noble
,equested closure information. A Request for Inactivation form will me mailed to Mr. Noble.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B. Cullom
Reviewer/Inspector SlwatnreDate: 3 d3 .
vim.

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection © Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
P:rcilii� Number 40 65 Date of Visit: G/19/2Qo2 Time: t3a1
• Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ff] Certified 0 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Thresbold: 212Q/2Q92....
Farm Name: Ralph.Noble.1jari ......................................................................... County: G exte.............................................. WARD .......
Owner Name: Ralph - - Q tl ..............-.................................... Phone No: 2.51m28.27.23A ......... ....................... .......................
Mailing Address: 515S. hway.90.3.No rth................................................................SAttW:j=.IY.C....................................................... 2 Sili.............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Ousite Representative: Ralph.Nohk.................................................................
Phone No:
Integrator: Mushy. Fatttlly:.Far=........
Certified Operator: 13atilllh 11.. ......... ...... NQUIC............................................ Operator Certification Number-18,63Q............. ..............
Location of Farm:
On road No. 1402 from 123 to 903 sign side of road.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 0 28 ' 32 w Longitude 77 ° ®' 23
Design :-Current Design Current Deaiga ::Current:
Swilne : C : aci .Po elation Poultry Capacity Population: .Cattle -Capacity Popolation:
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2200
0
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagooe 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
H ddmgPonda 1 SohdX 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is obsenved, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes. notit , DWQ) [] Yes [] No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estiinaled flow in gal/min`'
d. L)oLs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes I& No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
. Structure I Structure 2 Stnrcture 3 Sinicture 4 Structure 3 Stnicture 6
Identifrer:...............................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ...............2.7.............................................................................................I.

05103101
Fad ty Number: 40-65
a=
Date of Inspection 6/19/2002
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancermiprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenanoe/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Nay) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WLJP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21 _ Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfmspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes © No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
7. Need to mow lagoon dike walls to allow for routine and visual inspection. AL
7. Need to remove trash from lagoon.
15. Coastal Bermuda pasture needs to be sprayed for weeds.
*Facility has been depot 2/20/02. Building are being used as storage at time of inspection.
*Soil test will he taken when soybeans harvested in fall. Be sure to follow lime requirements.
*Waste analysis dated April 20, 02 with nitrogen 1.9 lbs/1000 gallons.
*Waste plan dated 2/26/01.
*Laeoon level is recorded weekly.
IReviewer/Inspector Name Martin Mcl;awhorn
1?ovinuaMlTno..n.•4n. Cinv.oh�+.o• llofa•

05103101 Continuer!
Facility Number. 40--65 Date of inspection 6/I912002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
27. N/A
30. N/A
31. NIA
19. There is not a current waste analysis for waste applied to wheat on 2/18/02. Remember to take waste analysis 60 days before / 60
ays after irrigation events.
**Rescue to be planted in fields 6 and 8. Contact tech spec for plan amendment.

of Visit O• Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 12-1a2D01 Time: 11:110 am
Facility Number 40 65
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................
Farm Name: RalR1A.NQW-EAt7nL--- ----.-.....---...................-_----------._....... County: Gt;4reJcte..............----_..... ...... �'4'�RiA.......
------.
OwnerName: RaIRh..... ....- .................... Noble.._ . ..... .... ....... ..... ......................... Phone No: (9101.285.-1723.......................................................
Mailing Address: �fS .Hf>±i1��x�tX.�Q iulrllt............................ .................................... Sauw.H U..1N.C---------------------------------.............---...... 185so.............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No
Onsite Representative. Wate.Noktle.............................................................................. Integrator: MuMjhy Fat»ly.jF.....................................
Certified Operator: R phi?......... _.... ._.. Nitble... ..... ... ... Operator Certification Number: 18.63Q.......
Location of Farm:
,On road No.1402 from 123 to 903 sign side of road.
T
® Swine [Ipouttry 0 Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 32 K Lonbitude 77 • F 23 G
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ®Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ® Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b_ If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes_ notifir DWQ) ® Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallnrirr? Unknown
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure l Structure 2 Stnucture 3 Stnucture 4 Struenrre 5 Slnictui�e 6
Identifier:..............................-............................-....-.......-..........................._..........._...................
Freeboard (inches):...............32...............

05103101
Facility Number:. 40-65 1 Date of Inspection 12-Ifl-200I
CanfihuedNt
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance./improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any strictures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
10. Are there any butlers that need maintenance/unprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pondmg ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &, General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/mspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
Cl Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this vkiL You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Lyn Hardison was notified by a Martin McLawhorn, representative of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation, who observed
wastewater Bowing out of the dog box and flowing into the stormwater diversion areas toward Mussel Run, while conducting the Operation
Review. Ms. Lyn Hardison and Ms. Daphne Cullom of the Division of Water Quality investigated the report and observed wastewater in the
stormwater diversion areas and in the unnamed tribuary to Mussel Rim, which is tributary to Contentnea Creek in the Neuse River Basin.
Most of the wastewater was contained onsite via earthen dams, however some waste product did reach Mussel Run.
Fecal coliform and Nutrient samples were collected at the following points: Upstream of Discharge, Discharge Pt., and Downstream of
Discharge. Photos were also taken on site at various locations. The amount of discharge and duration of discharge is unknown.
Mr. Noble stopped the pumps as soon as he was aware that the discharge was occurring and had three earthen darns put in place to
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu E: ",-"-- [_ , �, � � Date: 1440 t

i 6103/01 Continued
Facility Number. 40-65 Date of Inspection 12-10.20f►1
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover?
the wastewater and then pump it back into the lagoon; preventing further wastewater from entering Mussel Run
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2-11-2001, 9:28 am - Mr. Wayne Noble called the DWQ WaRO to indicate that all areas behind the earthen dams had been pumped
ack into the lagoon on 12-10-2001 and again at 8:40 am on 12-11-2001 due to the rainfall.
12-11-2001, 4:36 pm - Mr. Wayne Noble called the DWQ-WaRO to indicate that all the areas behind the earthen dams again this
afternoon_ He indicated that this would be repeated several more times prior to the weekend.

O�OF W A7F9pG Michael F. Easley
` Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
5 ( . { Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections
In general, these inspections included verifying that- (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2I10217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
qr Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
W The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wasteJsoil analysis and land irrigation
records_ These records should be maintained by the facility ownerlmanager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years. .
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land gplication. rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN} rate for the receiving crqpor result in runoff dururg any Given application.
(p All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is MgLst not a requiremen to keep crop yield information for figure use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated -
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant DischargeVimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext. 321 or your Technical Specialist
Cc: CV AO:3
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-WI (Telephone) 252-946-9245 (Fax)

N
of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReasonforVisit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility- Number 40 65 Date of Visit: 4-17-2001 Time: 3:20 pm
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted M Certified 13 Conditionally Certified ® Registered
Farm Name: RalphNo.W.Fa m... ........................................... . ........ I......................
OK-ner Name: R,alpk..................................... Noble ....................................... ...........
Mailing Address: 53J,5.jib:y._903.N0Ah-............. ............ ...... - ...
Facility Contact: .....................
Title:
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Countv:.Gx=m ............................................... .WARO......
Phone No: 252-.7.4{-3586..
5xto.8:.RW_NC_....... _......................... - 2858Q--------......
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: W( *mc Niahle....................... . Integrator: Abrphy.Eumily.,FArms:.....................................
Certified Operator: Mph ...................................... Nohk ................................................. Operator Certification Number: 186.30....................
Location of Farm:
On road No. 1402 from 123 to 903 sign side of road.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 28 32 Longitude 77 ° 34 23 zt
. .
:: Design Current ..:. Design _ . Current .::. Desigq_,:, Ctrrrent
...........Carigcity = Ponulation.::Ponitry... , ....... Canacit�.s.Poriulatian....:.Cattle:'
.......................................
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2200
1800
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holdir> Ponds !Solid Tra s ` No liquid Waste Management System
tiff
g P„ 9 ]
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1 _ Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E9 No
'Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obscrx,4 was the conveyance man-made" ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, i)otif.v DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is obseii ed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge by as,; a lagoon system? (Lf yes. notiA, DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0 No

UI/01/01
Facility Number: 40-65
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection 4-i7-2001
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Stluchu-e 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier. ..............................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ...... - ....... 2,3............... .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need mamtenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
Condufed
i
❑ Yes
N No
Stnucture 6
-
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N Na
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
17. Are rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Is there a water siipply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ IJnkno« n
Yes
❑ No
❑ On -site Cl Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit headily available?
❑ Yes
® No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
N No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
0 No

DINOI/0I
Facility Number. 40-65 Date of Impertion 4-17-2U01
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
Continued
Printed on: 4/18/2001
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permauenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne: B CulloQ a f r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date:

Zo
ofVisit O Compliance inspection © Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
n for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
DU to of Visit: 9/14lzt1110 Time: 1205
Facility Number 40 65
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name: Raluh.Xobk.FAQ►n..................................................................... ... County: Greene......
WARO.......
OwnerName: RaWk...................................... NOW........................................................... Phone No: ..........................................................
Facility Facility Contact: ................................... . Title: .... Phone No:
MailingAddress: R7t.1.B0x.17j.......................................................................................... SWW.HM.1N.0 ....................................................... 7. sso.............
Onsite Representative: Waync.Nohle.................. ............................. Integrator: Mu0hy..Fatal): Fararxa......................
Certified Operator.Ralph.W............................... Mollie ...............
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number.U630 .............................
)n road No. 1402 from 123 to 903 sign side of road. +
®Swine []Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 28 L 32 Longitude 77 D 34 4 23 u
Dischnraes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. «'as the conveyance mauanade?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. n hat is the estimated flow in gal./min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systern? (If yes_ notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes to No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Stricture 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .griilLaq .......• .......................................................................................
Freeboard(inches):..2K..................................................................................................................................................................................................

5100
Continued on hack
Facility Number. 40-65 Date of Inspection 9l1412000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maxunum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Anplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Small Grain Overseed Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? Cl Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ®No
�,-N6 vioIatiots: or"deficietricieswere;noted:during tlii§-visit:: You will;receive no furtlie_ r; ;-
ctirrespondence about this,visit.

Reviewerllnspector Signature: Date: 51001
Facility Number: 40-65 Date of inspection 9/14/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Hurricane Floyd caused some damage to buildings - continue efforts to clean insulation from lagoon.
J

Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other � ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 ti5 Date of Visit: 5/18/2t)DO Time: D:L Printed on: 5/23/2000
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.............
Farm Name: R,alttla.KQbIs.k:dl•.tlt.......... ......... ...................................................... I............ County: Grcutc .............................................. W11►RO.......
OwnerName: RAjVb...................................... Nolali~........................................................... Phone No: ...........................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:........................................... Phone No
Mailing Address: lif.1.a.QX.l.7.3.......................................................................................... Sjk.Q.W.HjJj..NC ...................................................... 2AS.80 .............
Onsite Representative: W..AlyAtg..N9.t?je.............................................................................. Integrator: lYlll>rA4..l;.l}jlAly..lr.;Itr.M5.....................................
Certified Operator: Rdlp+h.W� Rajph..W. .............................. N.0.19 ................................................ Operator Certification Numbcr:j.&0.3.9 .............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Norse Latitude 35 ° 28 4 32 Longitude 77 • 34 ' 23
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2200
2000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer 1 ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,200
Total SSLW 297,000
Number of Lagoons 1� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 27

4
Continued on back
(Facility Number: 40-65 Date of Inspection 5/18/2000 Printed on: 5/23/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (pasture) Fescue (pasture)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes []No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑- �lo•yioratitius:or deficiencies•were:note�:d:uring•iaiis •visit::Yon=will :receive nb furtlieir
correspondence about this.visit......... ... .. .. ........... . .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes IN No
Comments (refer to question 9): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Soil analysis 5/99; waste analysis 2/1/00
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance. Freeboard records and other records of the
CAWMP are complete.
Reviewer/Inspector Name !Daphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann Tyndall

e
■ L
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: f
Facility Number: 40-65 Date of Inspection 5/18/2000 Printed on: 5/23/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
J

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
iD Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Other Agency - Operation Review
19 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DW2 inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number 40 65 I Date of Inspection 11/3199
Time of Inspection 9:30 AM 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified i❑ Conditionally Certified Q Registered [3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: llttUX. Qlxlt..katt11 :............................. County: GtetrAe......... W ARQ ......
OwnerName: RAIAbL...................................... Noble............................................................ Phone No: 251.14 i-35#f...........................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address: FUJ.&N.J.7.3........
5m.Qw HilA..l! C...................
20.580.............
Onsite Representative:.!+Ayjvi&..No.blc.............................................................................. Integrator: 1Y.141rphy..FaJatalY.Fa,.ma.....................................
Certified Operator: ,alph..W............................... Noble ................................................ Operator Certification Number:j$ftjp
Location of Farm:
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... i
�1n .ru�sl.�Ja,..X 4 .f► Q�n .12 . ta.QR�si 11 .road,............................................................................................................................................................
N.NNN
..
Latitude 35 • 28 32 - Longitude 77 • 34 ` 23
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2200
2200
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Poultry Ca aci Pa ulation
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity 1 2,200
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JEISubsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ],Z,
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/94 Continued on back
Printed an 12/20199

Printed on 12/20199
Facility Number: 40-65 1 Date of inspection 11/3/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Small Grain Fescue Beans
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 ivoMOlatioAs_or .deficienCieS'WeCe_n'oted _during then Visit. _You: Will "receive nb fiiirtheir
correspondence about this •visit.. . . . . . • • • • • . . • • • . . . • .. . .:. .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Naste analysis 1015/99 = 1.1 lbs.
Floodwater came up on dike and was within one foot of going in lagoon. Some floodwater is still on fescue field. will
plant wheat and rye after beans when weather permits.
current lagoon level at 17 inches. Was at 19 inches per DWQ. Two (2) inches of rain recorded yesterday.
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name Karl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

a © Division of Soil and Water.Conservation'- Operation -Review
r © Division ofSoilandWInectioi►
N ®Division of Water Quality,- Compliance Inspection
4-
:-
0 Other Agency Oper4ho4i Review
10 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other �
Facility Number 's Date or Inspection
Time or Inspection 2.4 hr. (hh:mm}
® Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
.n," '1.
( i'f f-c,. vti County: .... .............`.-�'.'.`'Z"..-..--..............................................
Farm Name: ................. .........in--...--......---.....--..--..........................-....-....-.-........-.....-.--••----
OwnerName: R< P..h...-..N'.h--.........................-...................................-- Phone No:..................................................--..-....-...--......................
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:......
Flailing Address:
Onsite Representative:.................i....l.":/. .....-......... ......................... w J ..................
Certified Operator:
......................
.!✓. arc ......... '-...-.................................................
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:..
Operator Certification Number:,•,•,••
....................................................................................... .................................................................................................................. ................ ........................
Latitude Longitude
Design Current Design- Current Design Current
Capacity PopulationPouSwine Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder =: ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Eg Feeder to Finish '22C 2 2470 ❑ Non Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑Farrow to Finish Total Design[ Capacity .
❑ Gilts
❑Boars _ - Total SSLW
Y: T
_ . Nutuber.of Lagoons I�J ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding -Ponds./ Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Im No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Z No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway WYes ❑ No
Struchire I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ........... [.7...................................................................................................................................................... I....... .............. I....................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 19,No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
li No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
19No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenatice/improvement?
❑ Yes
iEQ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
d
MNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
9No
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
Q No
12. Crop type '6r�'I' $(5 -f, ,__-L _ 6e. K S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
15No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�4 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
JgNo
RequiredRecords & Documents
17,
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�9 No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
M No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
IRNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
0: M- iol'atidtis;ot. derciencies *ere pofedduring this;visit; • Y;ou will receive Rio; fu �thgr
CO' res�oridence: abauf this visit:
Com- - ents (refer to question ): Explain any YES answers and/or. any recommendations or:
any other comments:
- - or-
an
of facility: to better explain situatibris. (use additional. pages as necessary)
y a
WASH Gj"A-/5y 1+�I5I iq = i 1-I 16$. ii r1 [C
F1,4 v,-Je GhV C mt C\IvL_ iL.0 ilC� ifi 7`7 U i �Ua� J 4 C iitw� JASiYJ1• Jvm-4—
W t l l P?�t.tiv � t a-g, 1, e-yS w L
�;rre + I�hon-• �urI i� Va> ��' CI J)lT .e ccA,-cL
vFy�Pr kv
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: -�— Date:
3/23/99

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
vision of Water Quality
IG'lioutine O Comnlaint O Follow-up Of DIVO inspection O Follow-un of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection Z�3�81
Facility Number
Time of Inspection i a. DO 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered ertified [3 Applied for Permit �;�_ermitted 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: County:..�!.R..r...........................
O �............
�`t-
OwnerName:....��k.... W :........................ �06............................................... Phone No:... .-. .4 ......................................................
Facility Contact:........................................................ . Title:
MailingAddress; .......................... .1G? .....1l �� s........................................................
Onsite Representative: ..............................kk.'KkUt.................................................
Certified Operator, ....... .... ...... W.:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
....6np!4.. C.3.4..t..! C ...........................
Integrator:....., �.......... v�I�!!..Y�.S
p
Operator Certification Number:.,,,.�.�i.?�? C7....I._.....
....... .....
.. ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
C� ...... . 7...... :.............................. ...
Latitude Longitude �• �©"
r . Design Current
Swine `y Capacity POnulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
EiTeeder to Finish
S
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (I€ yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes G;FKo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes G;Wo
❑ Yes
Ewo-
0 Yes [�o
❑ Yes 2
❑ Yes ONo
Continued on back

V
Facility Number: p —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? El yes Sf o
Structures (l,agoons.11olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes O- oo
Structure t Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft):..:.1.�r1:.��.:................................ ..... !.:.......................?". ........ ....... 3.tin.,....... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 9<0
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Applica€ion
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .1Q........................
.r..... ....rfC1....... ............ y.... .4.....................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No.violations-or' deficiencies.were,noted-during' this. visit. You.will receive no further
correspondence about this:visit.-:
❑ Yes E
❑ Yes 2`So
❑ Yes 21KO
❑ Yes 9.!qo
❑ Yes W-Ko
❑ Yes 92'�o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes 91'o
❑ Yes i zo
❑ Yes M 1 To
❑ Yes 6IK-O
❑ Yes 93'No-
❑ Yes k
❑ Yes Q.<O
Corr ments`(refer'ti► question #) :Explain any YES answers and/or'anv reco unendations or any,other comments � rr
mw
Use. drawings of facility to:better`explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
6(y1*g� 'on . �1�2 . Nabl a_ P 1a�n1S o �n�we �UX)P J r.rt 0
AMR.�I.� , 5 rr�L� i ti 9 �) .
- 5�,� e �-� ,�,, �
[�-� -6 4-n
q - loop a be— a f fLuL - P
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 8 Date:

I/ .'i"i -
13 Division of Soil and Water Conserva
E Division of Water Quality
O %_ompiam[ O ronow-up
Facility Number
O
13 "tucr AgeucY
p o revjew O
Date of Inspection
Time of inspection
24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted In Not Date East Operated:
Farm Name: RaI•pJLJ4nble.Farm.................... County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: ».................. Nubia. ............ ..... .. .................... ... _.._.. Phone No: 746i-358h....... ......... ........ ........ ..............................
Facility Contact: » _....... .... »_.______ ...... .Title: .... Phone No:
Mailing Address: Rt.l.SoxX73---------- ... ........ ......... _.......... ......... ............. 28580 ............
Onsite Representative: Integrator: Murpby.Family.Earnm....................................
Certified Operator: Ralph.�V ____..........._». }1lobLe .WW....»___. .__ ..... .. Operator Certification Number:18434 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®' ©" Longitude ©• ®©u
AJeS1gn ALUrrent. PeSjgn. current 7Design urren
Swine 'V" ~-Capacity'Popalation _ Poultry Capacity Population * .Cattle Capacity Population
ean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
13 Farrow to Finis
13 Gilts
p Boars
Number of Lagoons f Molding Ponds p u sur ace rams resen agoon Area p pray ie rea =
o iqui as a anagement System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7/25/97

aria um er: 40_65
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holdin2 Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:. _- .............. _...._ . ._ ....... .
Freeboard (ft): 20 in.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes ® No
p Yes M No
p Yes ® No
p Yes M No
10 Yes M No
15. Crop type ___Com.(Silage.& Grain) ... ........... _......Soybrems................. ..... CoastalBermuda.Grass....................................................
__..
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 13 Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R . eo'.>`eiaspotpo�es.or eencie•were.noted-during �v>i . You reeive no further .
.tel: abode X 4 Y+S+t::
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes M No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Date: G _ 29 _ 2 7

W
Site Requires Immediate Attention: t�;Z?_
Facility No. - s
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: 7 , 1995
Time
Farm Name/Owner: 'PRFt n-, l 2 A LP q 1\1co A L
Mailing Address:
County: (',, R,C- a n ) ^
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: AIC-5�Q lio 2
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: No. of Animals on Site:
DEM Cert. No.: ACE DEM Cert. No.: ACNEW
Lat:1 _moo Q Long: J7 J¢ 248 Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25
year 24 hour storm event? (approx. fl, Ft + 7 in) Yes or<Jj_q__D-
Actual Freeboard: Ft / Inches
Was any seepage obser ed from the lagoon(s)? Yes ort�*�Was any
erosion observed? "br No Is adequate land av 1a le for
spray? e = No Is the cave ro adequ e? -or No
Crops) eing utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS nim m setback criteria?
200 Ft from, Dwellings? k No 100 Ft from Wells? for No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line
Stream? Yes o��Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated
within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o No animal waste
discharged into waters of the state by man-made di , flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes o ld
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records
(volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific
acreage w'th covert crop)? Yes or No
Inspector Name` U Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

Rw-
DEN
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Comments:
Sketch: