20051426 Ver 1_Complete File_20050727

?L?C??L1Mi? p
Q
Letter of Tranj*'Itfal
ER QUALITY
o5-i1A2U
SWE, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
704.523.4726
Fax: [phone]
To: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Firm: N.C. Division of Water Quality
Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Catherine McRae
Date: 9/2/05
Piedmont Natural Gas High Point Pipeline
Project: Relocation
Now with 16 Locations
throughout the Southeast!
p'??ayym,a Rakiph
Tri-Ciria. • '
%xwvrR: a Chwto"
vr.xaingwn
Mynl:
Atk ft • Coko"M R:ach
' . CAa -s+
savan.wl,..
Tamp:
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ? Under a Separate cover via: the Following Items:
? Maps ? Prints ? Plans ? Samples ? Report
® Permit Submittal ? Proposal
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
7 9/2/05 Revised page 4 for Pre-Construction Notification

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
? For Your Approval ? For Review and Comment
? For Your Use ? For Bids Due:
? As Requested
At the request of Mr. Daryl Lamb of your agency, we are forwarding the enclosed revised page 4
Comments: for the PCN previously submitted for this project. Please feel free to contact me with questions.
Respectfully, Catherine McRae
S&ME Project Number: 1357-05-386 Signed:

This Letter of Transmittal and the documents accompanying this Letter of Transmittal
contain information from S&ME, Inc., which is confidential and legally privileged. The
I information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named on this Letter of
I Transmittal. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on these documents
a is strictly prohibited.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
A Temp. fill 0.02 No - 200 feet forested
B Temp. fill 0.05 No adjacent forested
C Temp. fill 0.02 No adjacent emergent
D Temp. fill <0.01 No - 500 feet emergent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http:/hvww.fenia.,Rov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: approximately
0.12 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09 acre (within 40-foot construction easement)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* . Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma (linear feet Before Irn act (please seci
See attached Table 1 for Stream Impacts
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.majcLuest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Temporary impacts to
120 If of channel (40-foot maximum width per crossing). Site conditions may
necessitate permanent placement of riprap at crossing locations. If riprap is used, it
will be placed below the ordinary high water mark.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.
N/A - No impacts to open waters are anticipated
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 8
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
A Temp. fill 0.02 No - 200 feet forested
B Temp. fill 0.05 No adjacent forested
C Temp. fill 0.02 No adjacent emergent
D Temp. fill <0.01 No 500 feet emergent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hfp://www.fenia.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: approximately
0.12 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09 acre (within 40-foot construction easement)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* , Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) linear feet) Before Impact leasespecify)
See attached Table 1 for Stream Impacts
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uscs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Temporary impacts to
120 If of channel (40-foot maximum width per crossing). Site conditions may
necessitate permanent placement of riprap at crossing locations. If riprap is used, it
will be placed below the ordinary high water mark.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbod
y Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) acres bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A - No impacts to open waters are anticipated
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 8
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
A Temp. fill 0.02 No - 200 feet forested
B Temp. fill 0.05 No adjacent forested
C Temp. fill 0.02 No adjacent emergent
D Temp. fill <0.01 No - 500 feet emergent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (detemlination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: approximately
0.12 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09 acre (within 40-foot construction easement)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* . Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma) (linear feet Before Impact (please secif
See attached Table 1 for Stream Impacts
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Temporary impacts to
120 If of channel (40-foot maximum width per crossing). Site conditions may
necessitate permanent placement of riprap at crossing locations. If riprap is used, it
will be placed below the ordinary high water mark.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) acres bay, ocean, etc.
N/A - No impacts to open waters are anticipated
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 8
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
A Temp. fill 0.02 No - 200 feet forested
B Temp. fill 0.05 No adjacent forested
C Temp. fill 0.02 No adjacent emergent
D Temp. fill <0.01 No -r 500 feet emergent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fenia.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: approximately
0.12 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09 acre (within 40-foot construction easement)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* . Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) linear feet Before Impact (please secif
See attached Table 1 for Stream Impacts
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.coni, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Temporary impacts to
120 If of channel (40-foot maximum width per crossing). Site conditions may
necessitate permanent placement of riprap at crossing locations. If riprap is used, it
will be placed below the ordinary high water mark.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.
N/A - No impacts to open waters are anticipated
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 8
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
A Temp. fill 0.02 No - 200 feet forested
B Temp. fill 0.05 No adjacent forested
C Temp. fill 0.02 No adjacent emergent
D Temp. fill <0.01 No - 500 feet emergent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fenia.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: approximately
0.12 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09 acre (within 40-foot construction easement)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* . Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) linear feet) Before Im act (please seci
See attached Table 1 for Stream Impacts
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usas.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mQquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Temporary impacts to
120 If of channel (40-foot maximum width per crossing). Site conditions may
necessitate permanent placement of riprap at crossing locations. If riprap is used, it
will be placed below the ordinary high water mark.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.
N/A - No impacts to open waters are anticipated
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 8
2. hidividually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
A Temp. fill 0.02 No 200 feet forested
B Temp. fill 0.05 No adjacent forested
C Temp. fill 0.02 No adjacent emergent
D Temp. fill <0.01 No - 500 feet emergent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at litto://www.fenia.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: approximately
0.12 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09 acre (within 40-foot construction easement)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* . Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on rna) linear feet Before Im act (please seci

See attached Table 1 for Stream Impacts
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.niNquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Temporary impacts to
120 If of channel (40-foot maximum width per crossing). Site conditions may
necessitate permanent placement of riprap at crossing locations. If riprap is used, it
will be placed below the ordinary high water mark.
4. hidividually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.
N/A - No impacts to open waters are anticipated
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bbilcheads, etc.
Page 4 of 8
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
A Temp. fill 0.02 No - 200 feet forested
B Temp. fill 0.05 No adjacent forested
C Temp. fill 0.02 No adjacent emergent
D Temp. fill <0.01 No - 500 feet emergent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htto://www.fenia.go_v.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: approximately
0.12 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09 acre (within 40-foot construction easement)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* . Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on nia) linear feet Before Impact (please seci
See attached Table 1 for Stream Impacts
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Temporary impacts to
120 If of channel (40-foot maximum width per crossing). Site conditions may
necessitate permanent placement of riprap at crossing locations. If riprap is used, it
will be placed below the ordinary high water mark.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of
Name
Wate Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact )
(if
applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.
N/A - No impacts to open waters are anticipated
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 8

OF W A rF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q
?
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
-?lr Division of Water Quality

September 7, 2005
DWQ# 05-1426
Guilford County
Mr. Herb Jeans, P. E.
Manager of Construction
Piedmont Natural Gas
P. O. Box 33068
Charlotte, NC 28233
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Jeans:
Piedmont Natural Gas has our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill in
120 linear feet of perennial stream and to place temporary fill in 0.09 acre of wetlands for the purpose of
relocating an existing gas pipeline along Checker Road, in Guilford County near Archdale, as described in your
application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on July 27, 2005. After reviewing your
application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3374,
which can be viewed on our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This Certification allows you to
use Nationwide Permit Number 12 when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you
should secure any other applicable federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project,
including (but not limited to) those required by Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water
Supply Watershed regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires
unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is valid only for the purpose and design that you have described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a
new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or
in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification, as
well as the additional conditions listed below:
1. The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all other specific and general conditions of the
Certification are met. No other impacts, including incidental impacts, are approved:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Streams 120 linear feet Three unnamed tributaries to Richland
Creek, two located along Checker Road and
one located on Windcreek Court, near
Archdale in Guilford County.

No thCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Certification Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 Internet htto/l:h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Customer Service Number: 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Herb Jeans
Page 3, DWQ# 05-1426
September 7, 2005
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If
you have any questions, please telephone Daryl Lamb in the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office at 336-771-
4600 or Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-733-9721.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
r
AWK/cdl
Attachments
cc: Mr. Todd Tugwell, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
Wetlands/401 File Copy
Ms. Catherine McRae, C. E., S&ME, Inc., 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28273-5560

Triage Check List
Date:
To:
8/1/05
Project Name: High Point Gas Pipeline
DWQ#: 05-1426
Daryl Lamb, Winston-Salem Regional Office
60-day processing time: 7/27/05 - 9/25/05
County: Guilford
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks !
Re: " ea!m !able - High Point
Subject: Re: Stream Table - High Point
From: "Catherine McRae" <[e-mail]> FILIL 61"O"Y
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:59:43 -0400
To: <laurie [e-mail]> kL C_ V, r7 k P C,13
Laurie, when reading through the water quality certification for utilities, it
sounded like they are not an exempt activity, but that no mitigation is required.
Based on this interpretation, I entered impacts, but no proposed mitigation, when
filling out the form. I calculated the impacts based on the width of the temporary
construction easement. This would be the maximum amount of area disturbed; however,
the permanent impacts will be less, since only 10 feet of the easement can be
maintained at stream crossings. Please let me know if this is different from similar
submittals that you see. We don't often have projects in areas with mandated
buffers, and would appreciate any guidance you can give.
Thanks!
Catherine
I I I Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]> 7/29/2005 11:53:23 AM >>>
Catherine:
DWQ Project # is: 20051426 for High Point Gas Pipeline project
Question: on page 7 of PCN application under item # X, see the Zone 1,
Zone 2 box for Impact on Riparian/Watershed Buffers - was that meant to
be entered?
Let me know at your convenience.
Thanks,
Laurie Dennison
DENR-DWQ
Wetlands/401 Unit
[phone]
Catherine McRae wrote:
Laurie, sorry for the incomplete table. The attached table has been revised to
include columns listing temporary and permanent impacts. I also added a note at
the bottom identifying each of the streams as unnamed tributaries to Richland
Creek. Please let me know if you need additional information.
Thanks,
Catherine
Catherine McRae, C.E.
Project Manager Natural Resources Department
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard Charlotte, NC 28273
phone [phone] fax [phone]
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
This electronic message including any attachments and other documents referred to
herein, contains information from S&ME, Inc. that may be legally privileged and/or
confidential. The information is intended for the proper recipient(s) only. Any
other use, review, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of,
or reliance on, this e-mail or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying,
1 of 2 7/29/2005 1:46 PM
Re: ,7eam able - High Point
distribution, or use of the
message in error or are not
reply or by telephone at the
message and any attachments
contents is strictly prohibited. If you received this
the intended recipient, please advise the sender by
number listed above and delete this electronic
from your computer.
2 of 2 7/29/2005 1:46 PM
Re: '-?ream Table - High Point
e _ __
Subject: Re: Stream Table - High Point
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:53:23 -0400
To: Catherine McRae <[e-mail]>
Catherine:
DWQ Project # is: 20051426 for High Point Gas Pipeline project
Question: on page 7 of PCN application under item # X, see the Zone 1, Zone 2 box
for Impact on Riparian/Watershed Buffers - was that meant to be entered?
Let me know at your convenience.
Thanks,
Laurie Dennison
DENR-DWQ
Wetlands/401 Unit
[phone]
Catherine McRae wrote:
Laurie, sorry for the incomplete table. The attached table has been revised to
include columns listing temporary and permanent impacts. I also added a note at
the bottom identifying each of the streams as unnamed tributaries to Richland
Creek. Please let me know if you need additional information.
Thanks,
Catherine
Catherine McRae, C.E.
Project Manager Natural Resources Department
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard Charlotte, NC 28273
phone [phone] fax [phone]
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
This electronic message including any attachments and other documents referred to
herein, contains information from S&ME, Inc. that may be legally privileged and/or
confidential. The information is intended for the proper recipient(s) only. Any
other use, review, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of,
or reliance on, this e-mail or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the contents is strictly prohibited. If you received this
message in error or are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by
reply or by telephone at the number listed above and delete this electronic
message and any attachments from your computer.
1 of 1 7/29/2005 11:54 AM

*- S&ME
July 22, 2005
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Attention: Mr. Todd Tugwell
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260
Attention: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
FILE COH

2n n 5 1 42_ 6
Reference: Nationwide Permit No. 12
Piedmont Natural Gas - High Point Pipeline Relocation
Guilford County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
Dear Mr. Tugwell and Ms. Karoly:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) wishes to submit an application for impacts to waters of the United States
in accordance with Department of the Army Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12. Our client,
Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), is proposing to re-locate approximately one mile of gas pipeline in
Guilford County, NC to accommodate a new interchange on Interstate 85 planned by the N.C.
Department of Transportation (NCDOT). Accordingly, PNG will be considered the applicant for
this permit. Please find enclosed the following:
• A completed Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) and Letter of Authorization to Act as
Agent
S&ME, Inc. [phone]
9751 Southern Pine Blvd. [phone] fax
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273-5560 www.smeinc.com
Nationwide Permit No. 12
High Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Project Number 1357-05-386
July 22, 2005
• Appropriate Exhibits - Site Vicinity Map (Exhibit 1); USGS Topographic Map (Exhibit
2); Soil Survey Map (Exhibit 3); Approximate Stream Crossing and Wetland Locations
Map (Exhibit 4); and Lower Randleman Buffer Zones Map (Exhibit 5).
• Typical Stream and Wetland Involvement Figures
• Stream Crossings and Classifications Table
• Wetland Survey Sheets
• Photographs
• Routine Wetland Determination Form, USACOE Intermittent Channel Evaluation Forms,
NCDWQ Stream Assessment Forms
• Protected Species Assessment
• Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Processing Check - $200
Background Information
PNG plans to relocate approximately one mile of natural gas pipeline. The project originates at
an existing PNG pipeline in Guilford County southeast of Interstate 85 and approximately 500
linear feet (If) east of the end of Joplin Drive. The proposed project involves temporary impacts
to four wetland areas and three crossings of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. A pond located near
the northern terminus of the project will be directionally bored. The coordinates at the northern
terminus of the study corridor are approximately 35.9324°N, 79.9177°W and the coordinates at
the southern terminus are approximately 35.9279°N, 79.9263°W. The location of the project
corridor is depicted in Exhibit 1.
Impacts to waters of the U.S. are limited to temporary impacts associated with disturbance to
wetlands and streams during construction of the proposed pipeline. The impacts will result from
excavation of a trench, placement of the pipe, and then restoration of the affected portion of the
stream and wetland areas to original grades and contours. Stream crossings may additionally
entail placement of riprap below ordinary high water for stabilization purposes. The
approximate impacts of the proposed work are depicted on Exhibit 4 (Approximate Stream
Crossings and Wetland Locations) and the attached wetland survey sheets.
2
Nationwide Pennit No. 12 S&ME Project Number 1357-05-386
High Point Pipeline Relocation July 22, 2005
Field Observations
S&ME wetlands professionals conducted a field recomnaissance of the study corridor on June 6
and 7, 2005. The purpose of the field reconnaissance was to determine the presence or absence
of jurisdictional wetlands or waters of the U.S. within the study corridor. The delineation was
conducted utilizing currently accepted methods for wetland determination, as set forth in the
1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) Manual for Identifying and Delineating
Wetland Areas, which states that under normal circumstances, an area must demonstrate the
presence of three components to be considered jurisdictional: 1) hydrophytic vegetation, 2)
hydric soils and 3) wetland hydrology.
The scope of S&ME's work also included assessment of streams in the study corridor. These
stream assessments were conducted in accordance with the N.C. Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) and USACOE guidelines.
Conditions along the study corridor are depicted by Photos 1-6 (attached). Stream crossing
numbers, approximate geographic coordinates, and average widths are provided in the attached
table. Stream crossing locations are presented in Exhibit 4.
Protected Species
On June 6 and 7, 2005, S&ME conducted an assessment for potential habitat for protected
species along the study corridor, and determined that, based on the literature and pedestrian field
review, no potential habitat for protected species occur along the study corridor. No protected
species were observed during the field review. A copy of the Protected Species Assessment,
with details of methodology and findings, has been included with this PCN application.
3
Nationwide Permit No. 12 S&ME Project Number 1357-05-386
High Point Pipeline Relocation July 22, 2005
Delineation Results
Based upon S&ME's findings, jurisdictional wetlands will be impacted at four locations along the
proposed alignment (Exhibit 4). The temporary wetland impact areas total approximately 0.00
acre. Wetland types along the study corridor are limited to two emergent areas and two forested
areas. Typical vegetation observed in these wetland types is described in further detail below.
Typical Emergent Wetland: Wetland vegetation consisted of an herbaceous layer of lurid sedge
(Carex lurida), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), and false nettle (Boelnneria cylindrica).
Typical Forested Wetland: Wetland vegetation consisted of a canopy of sweetguin (Liquidambar
stvracijlua) with a subcanopy of box elder (Acer negundo) and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana).
Vines observed during field review included Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) and
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). The herbaceous layer was comprised of switchgrass,
Japanese bamboo grass (Microstegium vimineuni), and false nettle.
Locations of delineated wetland areas are identified on Exhibit 4, and on the attached wetland
survey sheets. Photos of the wetland areas and routine wetland determination forms are included as
an attachment to this submittal.
In addition to four wetland impact areas, the proposed High Point Pipeline Relocation project will
cross jurisdictional waters of the U.S. in three locations. Impacts to jurisdictional waters of the
U.S. include crossings of three intemnittent, aquatically important channels. These crossings will
result in temporary impacts to approximately 0.03 acre of jurisdictional channel. Approximate
locations of these stream crossings are identified in Table 1 and on Exhibit 4 (attached). Stream
data forms are also included as an attachment to this submittal.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed project has been necessitated by a new interchange for N.C. Highway 311 on
Interstate 85. To accommodate the NCDOT project, PNG must relocate an existing gas pipeline
4
Nationwide Permit No. 12
Hiuh Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Project Number 1357-05-386
July 22, 2005
that parallels Interstate-85. The alignment of the relocation has been detennined by the planned
interchange. Consequently, there are no practicable alternatives to the proposed project.
PNG has designed the proposed project to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and waters of
the U.S. Avoidance and minimization efforts undertaken by PNG include directionally boring a
pond at the northern terminus of the project, just east of Joplin Drive and limiting impacts to 40
feet in width at stream crossings and wetland locations.
Regulatory Considerations
The construction corridor will be limited to 40 feet in width across stream channels. Placement
of riprap will be restricted to the stream bottom and banks directly impacted by the placement of
the water main. Riprap will only be used below the normal high water level, and placement of
riprap will not result in de-stabilization of the stream bed or banks upstream or downstream of
the crossing. Following construction, stream crossings will be restored to original grade and
elevation. The proposed project will not result in permanent changes in pre-construction
elevation contours or stream dimension, pattern or profile. Excess material will be removed to a
high ground disposal area. Because the re-alignment has been dictated by the design of the
NCDOT interchange, two of the three stream crossings are not perpendicular to the channel.
Consequently, PNG is submitting this PCN to DWQ for approval.
Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices equaling those outlined in the most recent
version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual"
shall be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation,
operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to assure compliance
with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard. Sediment and erosion control measures
placed in waters will be removed and the original grade restored within two months after the
Division of Land Resources has released the project. Impacts have been avoided and minimized
to the maximum extent practicable, and appropriate measures will be taken during construction
to ensure that the flow and circulation patterns of waters of the U.S. remain unaffected to the
extent practicable.
-Alk Nationwide Permit No. 12 S&ME Project Number 1357-05-386
High Point Pipeline Relocation July 22, 2005
Based on our experience with similar projects involving impacts permitted through NWP 12, it is
our understanding that impacts to streams and wetlands resulting from construction of the
proposed project will be considered temporary if these areas are restored to original pre-
construction contours once construction is completed. Impacts associated with the proposed
project fall below the 0.5 acre threshold for NWT 12. Accordingly, this PCN for NWP 12 is
being submitted to the USACOE for approval. S&ME completed the PCN on behalf of PNG for
submittal to the USACOE.
Mitigation
We do not anticipate that our client will be required to provide compensatory mitigation since
the impacts are temporary in nature, and avoidance and minimization efforts have been
undertaken in the planning process.
Additionally, it is our understanding, based on previous experience with similar projects, that the
avoidance and minimization procedures implemented during the design phase of the proposed
Higll Point Pipeline Relocation, including the use of directional boring in some locations, should
be considered adequate mitigation for this project.
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written concurrence
with this NWP 12 permit application. If we can provide additional information or answer
questions you may have, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S&M
E, Inc.
64'?
Catherine McRae, C.E. Lisa J. Beck m, C.E., C.W.B.
Natural Resources Project Manager Natural Resources Department Manager
CAM/LJB/cam
Attachments
cc: Herb Jeans, Manager - Construction, Piedmont Natural Gas
6

Letter of Authorization to Act as Agent
and Pre-Construction Notification
JIUL. -0 ' 05 (WED) 15: 35
JUL-oa-aye % G t 3 2 FP014 0 33 A-140 MIP
Proleot Information
P, 005
i
LETTER F T ORIZA IOF
TO AC `s A AGENT
S&I E-Project Nerve: Pladmonrc Natural Gas High!'Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Projeot No. 1357-05-336
Type of Project: Wetland D®Ilneatlon - .?
I
Location: Linger utility corridor project In GullTord County, NC
roperty Owner/Applicant Ij
Business Nate:
Bailing Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Contact:
Pledmont Natural Gas
P.C. Box 33066
Charlotte, NO, 23233
[phone]
Mr. Herb Jeans, P.E. i
Informatl
Business Name: Swf , Inc.
Street Address: 9751 Southem Pine 6oulel
City, State, Zip Cade: Charlotte, NC 25273 1
Telephone No. [phone]
Contact: Catherine McRae
47
Authorizatlon:
I 1(wo, ? ( on behalf of
(CII®nt Conta ; gnature
Piedmont Ngt_yfai Gas, hersby authorize
(Nerrie of Applicant)
S&ME, Inc, to act as acgenj far the above-mentioned project.
I

Office Use Only: 2 0 0 5 Forn4 ers on6May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
P,1U1ll IENI
[ ,EIVED
1. Processing
II.
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Pen-nit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), the 0a J 1J (_?a
Applicant Information ( o

JUL 2 -1 2005
Owner/Applicant Information oENR-WArERQUALiTY
Name: Herb Jeans, P.E., Manager of ConstructibWLANDSANDSTO?.MWAFFf25RAt?CH
Mailing Address: Piedmont Natural Gas
P.O. Box 33068
Charlotte NC 28233
Telephone Number: 704.731.4422 Fax Number: 704.731.4098
E-mail Address: herb. ieans(oD- piedmontng.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Catherine McRae, C.E.
Company Affiliation: S&ME Inc.
Mailing Address: 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte NC 28273
Telephone Number: 704.523.4726 Fax Number: 704.525.3953
E-mail Address: cmcrae(aD_smeinc.com
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable snaps are provided.
1. Name of project: High Point Gas Pipeline Relocation Project
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A- linear pipeline project
4. Location
County: Guilford Nearest Town: High Point
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Interstate 85, exit onto
N.C. Highway 62 heading east. Turn left onto Checker Road. Turn left onto Joplin
Drive and proceed to dead end. Northern terminus of project is approximately 500
linear feet east of the end of Joplin Drive.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): See attached Table 1
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Approximately 7.3 acres (total right-of-way including temporary
work space)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Richland Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing conditions and land use along the route vary
from agricultural fields, pasture, pockets of wooded areas, and rural residential areas.
Page 2 of 8
r
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project involves the relocation of approximately one mile of natural gas
pipeline along the eastern side of Interstate 85 in Guilford County. The pipeline will
be ioined by welding and will then be lowered into a ditch and backfilled. Equipment
to be used on the iob includes trackhoes dozers, trucks, sidebooms, welding rips
and boring machines
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to relocate an
existing gas pipeline to accommodate the future construction of Highway 311 and a
new interchange with Interstate 85.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed impacts include
temporary placement of fill in four wetland areas (see below). Additionally, temporary
impacts to streams will occur during construction at three locations (see attached
Table 1). Jurisdictional areas impacted by construction of the proposed project will
be restored to original grades and contours upon completion of the project.
Page 3 of 8
Y
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland"
A Temp. fill 0.02 No -- 200 feet forested
B Temp. fill 0.05 No adjacent forested
C Temp. fill 0.02 No adjacent emergent
D Temp. fill <0.01 No - 500 feet emergent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
*y` 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fenia.gov.
°** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: approximately
0.12 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09 acre (within 40-foot construction easement)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream NTame** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) linear feet) Before Impact (please secif
See attached Table 1 for Stream Impacts
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
* Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tol2ozone.com,
www.mapruest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: temporary impacts to
120 If of channel (40-foot maximum width per crossing).
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A - No impacts to open waters are anticipated
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
Page 4 of 8
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any snaps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankrnent, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stornwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed project has been necessitated by a new interchange for N.C. Highway 311
on Interstate 85. To accommodate the NCDOT proiect, PNG must relocate an existing
gas pipeline that parallels Interstate 85. The alignment of the relocation has been
determined by the planned interchange. Consequently, there are no practicable
alternatives to the proposed proiect.
PNG has designed the proposed proiect to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and
waters of the U.S. Avoidance and minimization efforts undertaken by PNG include
directionally boring a pond at the northern terminus of the proiect, oust east of Joplin
Drive and limiting impacts to 40 feet in width at stream crossings and wetland locations.
Additionally, impacts to wetlands and streams will be temporary, and original grades and
contours will be restored upon completion of construction. A pond at the northern
terminus of the project will be directionally bored to minimize impacts to waters of the
U.S. Riprap will be used only when considered necessary , and will be restricted to the
area below ordinary high water. Major creek crossings may use temporary bridges
spanning the banks of the channel to facilitate movement of construction equipment.
Culverts or pipes will not be used.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
lit!p://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands/strmgide.htmi.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Based on conversations with the USACOE for recent similar projects, we anticipate
that appropriate mitigation for the proposed project will be limited to avoidance and
minimization procedures implemented during the design phase of the proposed
project. Minimization measures include utilizing directional bore methods for a pond
at the northeastern terminus of the project. Impacts resulting from the proposed
project are temporary. Original grades and contours will be restored in wetland areas
and at creek crossings.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following infonmation:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 6 of 8
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an envirommental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 7,200 3 N/A - exempt
2 4,800 1.5 N/A - exempt
Total 12,000 N/A - exempt
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Gone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0260.
N/A
Page 7 of 8
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
N/A.
XI1. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
/11 7
Applicant/ gent' Signature Datd '
(Agent's signature i only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
Exhibits 1- 5
T }
FAAPQV Sr: Butt Run GrundovaPkwy O?iml

?o ,
? Lc '4 1 km
9 akd
Csdrow Dr
,p t .
U
b C
i
i
s
d
htan
eu Ave c7 ro
sroa
rkr
?em
311
...,? M.Ibarns Hslghtx ?'}+?
' Qr CopP, ?
Branch rr ,` ' ;?
7 y
Leonard Ave :.
High Point 7riang??' Lage `
G1 m 0
Miiws
ssrc.a d? ?
n ? ?
o SherW uiitag•
m ;
te%l
?s trh? C fraar»an MIN "
?t
Spr?r?rioid o I
Foust A e '`? ? ? ' , 9akariawn
v
r,
'
c
29 ?Ap.nJ Y -.: 12?
_GLti4fard__.. ?,m F. ? _•'
R r vial `? : YArchdale GL illord
u Ri indCfph , ?.
., P. coltranes Witt

\
;Trinity d,

?a ..Q Ptagr?ss

MaeQue5t,com, inc., 0 2005 GOT, Inc
Approximate Study Area
Scale: As Shown Exhibit
SITE VICINITY MAP
Checked by: LJB PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Drawn by: SM Guilford County, North Carolina 1
DES ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Date: 6-2-05 Project No.: 1357-05-386
T T
1??\?'Y.o_? 4 ?`f `? _ ,1? t "•?! ? ?i? ? U ??-..F%J" 1?? a??? r ?? j ?1 ! l ice' ..'?_i- ?? ?? ?

(J
J? ?
?
If \ ? (
"4
I /? i (!
?J r ?rr?V

] i r r ? li r

.._...:?{
"" CJ\-? ??. r r• .Vi@ • ? ? I ~.?
t.1
62

A

.^r e' istt.... fS'} {. ICY ?
III
li /r 1
Approximate Study Corridor
Source: www.topozone.com, High Point East, 1993.
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mi
Scale: As Shown
Checked by: LJB &M 0
Drawn by: DES
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Date: 06-2-05
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP I Exhibit
PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Guilford County, North Carolina
Project No.: 1357-05-386

Approximate Study Corridor
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ Approximate Location of Interstate 85
EnB Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slope
EnC Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slope
EnD Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slope
Wh Wehadkee silt loam
Source: Guilford County Soil Survey, 1977
Scale: As Shown
Checked by: LJB &N 0 AM,
Q?Wm
Drawn by: DES
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Date: 06-2-05
SOIL SURVEY MAP I Exhibit
PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Guilford County, North Carolina
Project No.: 1357-05-386
s
_ s £
72 l? I °r R K T
N
. 1 er
0
C) cl
s' .
Lt Saar , c
0 4 to a" CD
?'.- t? »# -. tike '.?.? ?• v, -2 cz
-f L
IL r ??? * v hE ? p (o
x Z U
70 7 2 Cti CO
V O C
Q M' G?a .N d F O
CD Lu 0 a- 5 i i'?Y 3 ry'? Q V Z t0
m •0 p =3 C? Loo
Z a- C)
rQ ? er a J C7
c Q P
lip ?-
9 d 2 -
L O LQ? U Q) z
Nx !C
LAS CL
..
q?Y?r i.. c c
M o
wZ
°iai?f
Ift
? ??l J p ww
p AC
-Rrlx t+
C: (D CO
E
4 CL n- `n cn
a }Y y r, y ?? ' 7 N p cz
y314?'v.` t" gr ...r x?t?tt ,,q?+r..?? - ly rf?ti QC O C J r
?,?'?-3?? v„ ?° l "??e:` x '?•"' y*'to r?y,h? / ?? I Y ??? X C C V O
(Z ca
ar.-tii?k7l ski. .?4_ ?( '` a N «?

D,
G
D
O

LEGEND
- Streams and Ponds
-µ - Randleman Buffer
Zone 1 (30')
Randleman Buffer
Zone 2 (20')
D
o-o-a Proposed Pipeline
Relocation
o ®o Existing Pipeline
Alignment
0

D
0
D,
0

THE ABOVE GIS DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE GUILFORD COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT WEBSITE. THE LOCATION OF THE UTILITY EASMENTS WERE APPROXIMATED
INFORMATION FROM PNG. PLEASE NOTE THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PROPERTIES ONLY. IT IS NOT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER PURPOSES. THERE
NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S&ME, ING ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON
INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE ABOVE DATA.
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
DATE:
07/20/05
de 0 9751 SOUTHERN PINE BLVD
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28273
PH. 704.523-4726
FAX. [phone]
ENGINEERING • TESTING WWW.SMEINC.COPA
PROJECT N0: DRAWN BY. CHECKED BY:
\ 1357-05-386 DRA LJB
General Location of
® Proposed Interchange
NCDOT Project
500 250 0
Feet
NG
500
Randleman Buffer Zones Map EXHIBIT
PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation 5
Guilford County, North Carolina
Wetland Crossing
Right of Way
--
Silt Fence
I& I& I&

Wetland

Bentonite Plug Bentonite Plug

Temporary Equipment
Crossing

'k IL lu ?k
Eq
ipment Mats
A ?. a 'k
Wetland

Silt Fence
---------------
Right of Way
Stream Crossing
Wet Ditch Method (A)
Right of Way
0
Pipe Trench
Pipelin
0-0?0-0-0°?0
0°0°0°0°00
o°o°0°0°0°0
00000000000
00000000000
00000000000
Gravel Construction
Entrance
o°8°8°8°o°
0°0°0°0°0°
Trenchline Barrier
or Earthen Plug
o°o°o°o°o°o
0°0°0°0°0°0
000000°0000
00°0°000000
00000000000
0„0„0_0_0-0
Equipment Mats
ilt Fence
Rock Silt Screen
Stream
Temporary Equipment
Crossing
Right of Way

Stream Crossing
Wet Ditch Method (B)
Pipe
Right of Way
Gravel Construction
Right of Way
Trenchline Barrier
or Earthen Plug
Rock Silt Screen
Stream Crossings and Classifications Table
Nationwide Permit No. 12 - Pre-Construction Notification
PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
July 22, 2005
Stream Crossings and Classifications Table 1,2,3,4
Stream Lat/Lon. Average Width of Stream
Crossing Temporary Permanent Stream
(NAD 1927 UTM Zone 17) Before Impact
Number Impacts Impacts Classification
1 35.9268°/79.9218° 3 feet 40 linear feet 10 linear feet Intermittent,
important
2 35.9269°/79.9233° 2 feet 40 linear feet 10 linear feet Intermittent,
important
3 35.9275°/79.9248° 2 feet 40 linear feet 10 linear feet Intermittent,
important
t See Exhibit 4 for Stream Crossing Locations.
2 All impacts involve utility line crossing and placement of riprap below ordinary high water.
3 Construction width for each stream crossing will not exceed 40 feet; maintained easement wil l not exceed 10 feet.
4 All streams are unnamed tributaries to Richland Creek.
Stream Tabte - High Point
Subject: Stream Table - High Point
From: "Catherine McRae" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:48:38 -0400
To: <[e-mail]>
Laurie, sorry for the incomplete table. The attached table has been revised to
include columns listing temporary and permanent impacts. I also added a note at the
bottom identifying each of the streams as unnamed tributaries to Richland Creek.
Please let me know if you need additional information.
Thanks,
Catherine
Catherine McRae, C.E.
Project Manager Natural Resources Department
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard Charlotte, NC 28273
phone [phone] fax [phone]
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
This electronic message including any attachmentsland other documents referred to
herein, contains information from S&ME, Inc. that may be legally privileged and/or
confidential. The information is intended for the proper recipient(s) only. Any
other use, review, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of, or
reliance on, this e-mail or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or
use of the contents is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error or
are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by reply or by telephone at
the number listed above and delete this electronic message and any attachments from
your computer.
Content-Type: application/msword
STREAM CROSSING TABLErev.doc'
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 7/29/2005 7:49 AM
Nationwide Permit No. 12 - Pre-Construction Notification
PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
SAME Project No. 1357-05-386
July 22, 2005
Stream Crossings and Classifications Table 1,2,3
Stream Lat/Lon
.
Crossing (NAD 1927 UTM Zone 17)
Average Width of Stream Before Impact
Stream Classification
Number
1 35.92680/79.9218° 3 feet Intermittent, important
2 35.9269°/79.9233° 2 feet Intermittent, important
3 35.9275°/79.9248° 2 feet Intermittent, important
i See Exhibit 4 for Stream Crossing Locations.
z All impacts involve utility line crossing and placement of riprap below ordinary high water.
3 Construction width for each stream crossing will not exceed 40 feet; maintained easement will not exceed 10 feet.
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER, ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER, AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTLIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL."
NAME:
TITLE:
SH=T 4
S
DATE:
AID
SHEET 3

SHEET 2
---------------

t
INTERSTATE 85
t
unrz
r
SHEET 5
• `t,1t11t11If1(tr?7J'
,?XI CAR
SEAL yr' -
r L•3413 ca
v 9?0 `yC)
} SITE
W
J
J
W
RD 1?10?
y
°j1JU1nlm111111 ° \ACINITY MAP
0=, TO S=4
I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.
W. ANDREW EADES PLS L-3413 DATE: 7-7-05
SHEET 6
SHEET 7

INTERSTATE 85
- t
I
\ SCALE 1"= 300'
. • i , • •
C JOB NUMBER,: 03139-0007 NOTES: 0 150 300 600 900
&;e DWG. NUMBER: a 1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 7 WETLAND "404" SURVEY 2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
8020 TOWER POINT DRIVE PROJ. SURVEYOR: WAE OF 3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28227
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone] DRAWN BY. JCD PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE 4. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY SAME, INC.
COMPUTER, FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-WET GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).
Internet Site: http://www.mckimcreed.com DATE. 07/07/05
I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRA'N UNDER
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.

W. ANDREW EADES PLS L-3413
4.89
S 52'54'17" yr
13.08 102.43'
DATE: 7-7-05
X12
EXISTING-POND
TOTAL AREA
11,158 sq. ft.
0.26 ACRES
L9 (TOTAL) Q?
L20
STREAM ?? • . ?q ?? Q?
155 sq. ft.
0.00 ACRES 0? 0
r
L23 y<
TOP OF BANK 0.23
II L25
ol!
- -- - -- A— 14+00

L21 1.35
EXISTING-POND
AREA INSIDE EASEMENT
4,775 sq. ft.
0.11 ACRES
S 52'5Y 17" W
77.81'
12.45
L6 ---r
_1
W
Nom''
CO
L?
((?/rte' /
SEAL 9?.. _
L•3413 rr' -
U P.
P to IM
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTLIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL."
NAME:
TITLE:
k L15 ?
L13
DATE:
J
o r,?
N' O
M
J
POND LIMITS
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
RIGHT OF WAY
?,5 v
- EXISTING R/W
14-r 18.61
fFETLAVD TIE
JOB NUMBER: 03139-0007
DWG
NUMBER:

"
"
. WETLAND
404
SURVEY
TOWER POINT DRIVE
802 SHEET NUMBER: 2 OF 7 OF
0 PROJ. SURVEYOR: WAE
Charlotte, North Carolina 28227
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
DRAWN BY: JCD
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-WET GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Internet Site: http://www.mckimcreed.com DATE. 07/07/05
} SITE
J
J
W
TY RD
G
VICINITY lAAP
C.-,T To E"•.7=E1
LINE TA BLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 47.31' N 09'12'45" W
L2 24.38' N 15'05'31" W
L3 38.80' N 36'10'35" W
L4 23.85' N 07'15'35" W
L5 22.77' N 28'40'17" E
L6 38.79' N 63'26'18" E
L7 18.00' S 81'33'46" E
L8 42.26' S 65'20'04" E
L9 17.97' S 28'01'46" E
L10 46.83' S 20'29'35" W
Lll 37.53' S 06'45'35" W
L12 26.84' S 28'38'31" W
L13 23.42' S 54'08'14" W
L14 14.14' S 22'17'26" W
L15 11.27' S 45'38'11" W
L16 10.73' N 25'02'57" W
L17 3.25' N 0319'00" E
L18 12.01' S 43'47'07" E
L19 16.84' S 03'45'02" W
L20 6.92' S 40'27'33" W
L21 3.00' N 57'50'46" W'
L22 5.67' N 22'00'09" E
L23 13.37' N 03'45'02" E
L24 9,81' N 43'47'07" W
L25 5.00' N 46'12'53" E
15+00 SCALE 1"= 40'
0 20 40 80 120
NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIM,BLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.
4. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&ME, INC.
5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).
AID:
v
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER, AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 `gh
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. >
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTLIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION c ???/RRo
MANUAL." t18EP.TY RD
NAME:
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT U - rn7
y l s L9 ^ TI TLE:
N co-
WETLAND A JI
AREA INSIDE EASEMENT DATE:
WETLAND A
1,058 sq. ft. TOTAL AREA
0.02 ACRES 1,344 sq. ft.
0.03 ACRES AID:
WETLAND LIMITS f nI?
RIGHT OF WAY ~
rT0,?9 .?i
9\ S?
\10.24
I
I
I
I
I
wl
SIN
? N
SIN
o?
nI
?I
I
I
I
11+00
11+27.78
RETLAh'D TIE
JOB NUMBER:
DWG. NUMBER,: 03139-0007
SHEET NUMBER: 3 OF 7
8020 TOR-R POINT DRIVE PROJ. SURVEYOR: WAE
Charlotte, North Carolina 26227
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone] DRAWN BY. JCD
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-WET
I, W. ANDREW FADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER, MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.
lJ3
W. ANDREW EADES PLS L-3413 DATE: 7-7-05
VICINITY MAP
0 TO ws _h
SITE
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 35.86' S 13'40'18" W
L2 27.32' N 46'08'30" W
L3 20.37' N 41.28'30" W
L4 26.51' N 57.02'37" W
L5 23.59' N 60'41'47" E
L6 31.39' S 44'16'00" E
L7 9.00' S 76'30'04" E
L8 12.70' S 86'40'33" E
L9 30.44' S 19'01'29" W
L10 13.63' S 19'00'55" W
11 CAP,p
a SEAL
7 L-3413 0
??''f?fulmurmn?`
1,+00 SCALE 1"= 30'
0 15 30 60 90
NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
WETLAND '404' SURVEY 2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
OF 3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE 4. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&ME, INC.
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).
Internet Site: httP://www.mckimcreed.com I DATE: 07
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER, AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION "AS MADE UTLIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL."
(es p??K? ??,
SITE
W
N o
TY RD wh?l fo
10.69
NAME:
1.87 N7
- PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ?L22L16 ---
TITLE: P / f y 4>
WETLAND B
AREA INSIDE EASEMENT 10.53
2,103 sq. ft. a^' ?ry i
DATE: 0.05 ACRES
WETLAND B -,9 STREAM 1
TOTAL AID: I? L11 / 2,554 sq.Eft. AREA INSIDE sEASEMENT
rn 0.06 ACRES ?p 780 q
0.02 ACRES
I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER,
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER, MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.
W. A DREW EADES PLS L-3413 DATE: 7-7-05
3100
SCALE 1 "= 30'
0 15 30 60 90
13+81.28 14t00
IIE'TL.a!vD TIE
JOB NUMBER:
DWG. NUMBER: 03139-0007

' NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SHEET NUMBER: 4 OF 7 WETLAND
404 SURVEY 2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
8020 TOYER POINT DRIVE PP,OJ. SURVEYOR: WAE OF 3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.
Charlene, North Carolina 28227
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
DRAWN BY:
JCD
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE
4.
THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&ME, INC.
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-WET GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).
MCINITY MAP
RAT TO sr h

- RIGHT OF WAY
0I•-
- - ..
L23 1211 L21 ?? . . _ -
- ..
l
. .^-
o (? . . 1
51
.iTB_ J Jy
lip?P? LINE TA BLE
J ILA /
6
, L
? LINE LENGTH BEARING
? L1 21.22' N 80'12'03" W
L2 17.23' N 6537'38" W
?ml /°'
J
v
/ L3 13.53' N 29'52'37" W
WETLAND LIMITS
I/ ?0 L4 23.11' N 31'43'08" W

/ L5 22.64' N 39'35'38" W

iui I TOP OF BANK L6
24.99'
N 29'55'34" W
is;;;ul
nrrrrri i L7 15.67' N 42'17'49" W
... L8 17.45' N 71'26'48" W
ES514
L9
12.30'
N 7914'24" E
9r•' = L10 32.75' N 82'01'37" E
SEAL
-
: = L11 15.59' S 03'01'07" W
L•3413 r<
= :9 p; L12
18.25'
S 75'32'14" E
v40S
`1?y?
h ?I L13 48.45' S 03'26'16" E
UR
v
. L14 32.95' S 69'38'25" E
?pREV1
ti?
" 1n
N L15 29.02' S 29'33'40" E
' i1llippll !n
o I - L16 12.27' S 13'40'46" E
co L17 21.56' N 66'50'33" W
L16 14.37' N 46'13'40" W
L19 6.12' N 37'18'15" W
L20 34.93' N 52'02'32" W
_ L21 36.07' N 11'01'26" W
L22 24.71' S 12'57'13" E
----- L23 33.26' S 09'42'28" E
Internet Site: http://www.mckimcreed.com I DATE: D7
I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAM UNDER,
MY SUPERVISION FROM, AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.
0•
W. AN

EADES PLS L-3413 DATE: 7-7-05
14+00
ESS/p•??,Q''.
ti.
SEAL 9r.
L•3413
?'4jrrr+rullud•
14 T 3.5. 9,9
ll""ETL.T.bD TIE
-P-1,1IP.D-
RIGHT OF WAY
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
I
I
I
I
I
31
NIA
rnl co
In l
I
I
I
I
I
1
?L10
.I .
I
I ?
c/ I
V/
/ I
rl ??
JI I
I I
?I
TOP OF BANK --? aM
?I
STREAM 2
AREA INSIDE EASEMENT
197 sq. ft.
0.00 ACRES
SCALE 1"= 30'
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
Lt 11.73' S 35'14'15" W
L2 13.42' S 41'50'06" W
L3 13.98' S 20'04'02" W
L4 13.08' S 05'24'22" W
L5 3.47' N 55'22'19" W
L6 25.83' N 12'15'31" E
L7 10.55' N 2512'45" E
L8 6.29' N 53'51'46" E
L9 9.73' N 30'53'53" E
L10 5.50' S 55'51'40" E
VICINITY MAP
a? n =I-r)
SITE
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER, ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER, AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTLIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL."
NAME:
TITLE:
DATE:
AID:

' JOB NUMBER: 03139-0007
l Vj
1i1.lY1 DWG. NUMBER: WETLAND "404" SURVEY

DRIVE SHEET NUMBER: 5 OF 7
OF
, POINT
8020 PROJ. SURVEYOR: WAE
te N
Charlotte, , North Ccrdina 28227
Phone: [phone], Fox: [phone] DRAWN BY: JCD PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-'JET GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
0 15 30 60 90
NOTES: .
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.
4. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&ME, INC.
5. BASIS OF BEARING IS ,NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).
TY RD I Intemet Site: http://www.mckimcreed.com I DATE: 07

10+97.04
I1-ETL41 D TIE 11700
SEAL 9?: =
L•3413 ?o
• St1RN?: CD.
11 x 18,14
J17ETL4 .1'D TIE

I
-P-(.IIP D-
I
I
I
I ?
I

Iz
? Iz
m
?
? ?
9? malt' ol
wC4
lr ?lv
W
I ?I?
ll1
?ILi
VIcn

I t Iz I?

co
IIII WETLAND C )
I I TOTAL AREA I
I. I I 1,468 sq. ft.
m l l 1 0.03 ACRES
I
L9 - - _L10_
_ ??/?TLAND LIMITS

U ?/Cl
RIGHT OF WAY ?L1 ?

I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER, MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.

W. ANDREW EADES PLS L-3413
DATE: 7-7-05
}
W
J
N
UBERTY RD
VICINITY VIAP
(1107 M w1??
SITE
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING L13 16.14' S 09'17'00" E
L1 30.37' S 171538" E Lt4 28.24' S 47'12'26" W
L2 15.02' S 49'1514" W L15 14.34' S 26'33'35" W
L3 21.68' I N 85.25'49" W L16 9.40' S 51'08'21" W
L4 7.95' N 59'54'23" W L17 5.21' S 33'38'41" W
L5 6.65' N 68'11'32" W L18 3.24' S 6716'30" W
L6 8.48' S 33'04'52" W L19 1.28' N 37'13'31" W
L7 11.82' N 45'53'27" W L20 7.95' N 33'38'41" E
L8 12.58' N 14'02'44" E L21 9.21' N 51'08'21" E
L9 14.49' N 71'23'26" E L22 14.23' N 26'33'35" E
L10 35.68' N 69'12'21" E L23 27.06' N 4712'26" E
L11 5.82' N 69'53'29" E L24 12.69' N 17'21'13" W
Lt 2 9.65' S 50'51'47" E L25 10.90' N 50'51'47" W
CURVE TABLE
CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD DELTA
Cl 1066.27' 56.04' S 71'54'30" W 56.03' 3'00'40"
STREAM 3 s 1 / \S 1.19 0
AREA INSIDE EASEMENT y l ' f ??e \ D
284 sq. ft.
0.01 ACRES
PUBLIC UTILITY NT
rl
lII
kFG/?
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACTIN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTUZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL."
NAME:
TITLE:
SCALE 1 30' DATE:
0 15 30 60 90 AID:
JOB NUMBER:
DWG. NUMBER: 03139-0007

ET
AND "404" SUR NOTES:

1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SHEET NUMBER: 6 OF 7 L
VEY 2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
8020 TOWER POINT DRIVE PROJ. SURVEYOR: .
WAE OF 3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER". METHODS.
Charlotte. North Carolina 28227
Phone: [phone], Fox: ( x: [phone]
DRAWN BY:
JCD
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE
4.
THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&ME, INC.
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-WET GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).
WETLAND C
AREA INSIDE EASEMENT
934 sq. ft.
0.02 ACRES
X021 %??15 TOP OF BANK
Internet Site: http://www.mckimcreed.com I DATE- 07
I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER,
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER, MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.
W. ANDREW EADES PLS L-3413 DATE: 7-7-05
?5+33.g9 TIE
IFETLA%
?6+00 1`
c 4Q/
SEAL
L•3413 ?i E
'OS(JRl\3
gr4;mnnuralu?????
?Lf,
lw
°lU
'1rl
I
5.41 7.26
L3 (TOTAL):??? RIGHT OF WAY
L5?-
11.76??
4 ?Ll (TOTAL)
XV!2 8.98
WETLAND D
TOTAL AREA WETLAND D
150 sq. ft. AREA INSIDE EASEMENT
- 0.00 ACRES 94 sq. ft.
0.00 ACRES
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
LINE TA BLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 16.24' S 02'18'48" E
L2 12.67' S 46'08'12" W
L3 17.17' N 00'09'07" W
L4 11.58' N 47'25'17" E
L5 10.65' N 55'46'35" E
4r
c:
USERTY RD
,)5+00
I
/ I
Fo
VICINITY MAP
(Not TO MBE)
SITE
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS. DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER, AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404.
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTUZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL"
NAME:
TITLE:
DATE:
AID:
CR\l
8020 TONER POINT DRIVE
Charlotte, North Carolina 28227
Phone: [phone]. Fay [phone]
Internet Site: http://www.mckimcreed.com
SCALE 1 "= 30'
F-73 1-771 177777--??
0 15 30 60 90
JOB NUMBER: 03139-0007 NOTES:
DWG. NUMBER: WETLAND "404" SURVEY 1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SHEET NUMBER: 7 OF 7 2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
ROJ. SURVEYOR: WAE OF 3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.
DRAWN 6Y: JCD PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE 4. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&:ME, INC.
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGH POINT-WET GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).
07
Wetland and Stream Survey Sheets
Site Photographs
Sb ,_$t Q

a
V 1 ,p

Photo 1: Facing southeast across pond at northeastern
limits of corridor.
Photo 2: Typical view of vegetation along proposed
alignment.
Photo 4: View of Wetland B.
21,
w
I i f15?{Y
T "3 c f ,d "tr Y 3 ? 4
4
k.?tvY
44
Photo 5: Facing northwest at Stream Crossing 1. Photo 6: Facing atortheast at Stream Crossing 2.
Date: 6/6/05 & 6/7/05 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
*SM PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Taken by: CAM
Guilford County, North Carolina
Checked by: LJB EENGINEER NVIRONMENTNG TESTING
AL SERVICES
Project No.: 1357-05-386
Photo 3: View of Wetland A.
Wetland and Stream Data Forms
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DELINEATION
(1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL)
Project/Site: High Point Pipeline Relocation Date: 6-06-2005
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas County: Guilford
Investigator: Catherine McRae/Suzanne Knudsen State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the Site? YES NO Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? YES NO Transect ID: Plot ID: DP-1
Is the area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse) YES NO Let: 35.92880N Lon: 79.92180W

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Do minant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
_-
1. Carpinus caroliniana T FAC 8. Acer rubrum T FAC
2. Acer negundo T FACW 9.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua T FAC+ 10.
4. Parthenocissus quinquefolia V FAC 11.
5 Lonicera japonica V FAC- 12.
6. Panicum virgatum H FAC+ 13.
7 Boehmeria cylindrica H FACW+ 14.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OB L, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 7/8 known (87.5%)
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
HYDROLOGY
r] Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
FIELD OBSERVATIONS ? Drift Lines
Depth of Surface Water (in.) N/A ® Sediment Deposits
Depth to Free Water in Pit (in.) 4 inches ® Drainage Pattern in Wetlands
Depth to Saturated Soil (in.) 0 Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Remarks: ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Wetland hydrology is present. ® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Enon fine sandy loam, 6 Drainage Class: Well-drained
to 10 percent slopes
_
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Ultic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped
Type? Yes ? No ?
PROFILE DESCRIPTION Community ID: Wetland
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-1 O
24 131 10YR 3/3 10YR 4/4 few/distinct Sandy silt
B2 G1 4/10Y Silty loam

HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
? Histosol
? Histic Epipedon
? Sulfidic Odor
? Aquic Moisture Regime
? Reducing Conditions
X? Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Concretions 4-8"
? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in
Sandy Soils
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soils are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® YES ? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? EYES ? NO
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
® YES ? NO
Hydric Soils Present? ® YES ? NO
Remarks:
This data point is located within a wetland.
NCDNNIQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: High Point Pipeline Relocation River Basin: Cape Fear County: Guilford
Evaluator: Catherine McRae, Suzanne Knudsen D«VQ project No:
Nearest Nanied Stream: Richland Creek Date: 6/07/05
USGS QUAD: High Point East Lat: 35.9268°N Lon: 79.9218'INI
Location/Directions: Unnamed Tributary to Richland Creek, southwest of intersection of Checker Road and Joplin Di ive.
Stream ID: Stream Crossing 1 (SA-1)
"`PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also. if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used*
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomornhologv
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? U 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1
(D 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? U 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5) Is There An Active Or Relic) Flood lain 0 1 2 3
6 Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7 Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2 3
9 Is A Continuous Bed & Barak Present 0 1 2 3
10) Is A 2" Order Or Greater Channel (As
Indicated On Topo Map AnrUOr In Field)
Present?
No <D
Yes = 3
NO I E: It Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=Ul)
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 10
It. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge 0 1 2O 3
Present?
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present hi Streambed? 3 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present hi Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3) Is Peri hyton Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4
S ECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Cirdc One Alumber Per Lind
L Geonl01-Dh0102V Absent Weak Moderate Strom
l) Is There a Head Cut? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Is There a Grade Control Present in 0 .5 0 1.5
Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate a Natural
Drainage Way?
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3
II. HvdrologN,
Absent Weak Moderate StronE
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter Present 1.5 O .5 0
in Streambed?
2) Is Sediment (or) Debris Present on Plants? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water in Channel and >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (Note: If ditch indicated in No. 9 0 .5 0 1.5
above, ski this step and No. 5 below*)
5) Is There Water Present in Channel during 0 .5
0 1.5
Dry Conditions or in Growing Season?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in Sides of Yes = 1.5 No = 0
Charinel or in Head Cut?
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 6
iii. Riolnprv
Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fish Present? L OD 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? .5 1 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus
Present? (1
??==??'' .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
SAN' Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly
OBL FACW FAC FACU UPI,
8) Are Wetland Plants in Streambed? 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
r "NOTE: If I btal Absence UJ All Plants /n Streambed As Noted Above slap Ilas step UNLLSJ' JAV Present-).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1.25
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = 26.25
(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least hitennittent)
Signature: C ?(,?I (= (• „l f??4--
I'
b
.-WTION ID SA-1
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
APPLICANT NAM E Piedmont Natural Gas
d r
DATE (/07/05
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.c., culvert, relocation, etc.) Utility line crossing
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN Unnamed tributary to Richland
Creek/Cape Fear
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Sunny, dry, warm (87°F)
P SP NP Observation Continents or Description
Fish/Sliellfish/Crustaceans Present
Benthic Macroinvertebrates isopods, scuds
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae and/or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, other) Raccoon tracks in creel. bed
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) None identified
e Riffle/Pool Structure
a Stable Streambanks
Channel Substrate (i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand)
Riparian Canopy Present (SP=/> 50% Closure)
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
Flow in Channel Weak flow
e Wetlands Adjacent to/Contig. With Channel
(Discontinue)
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June thru
September)
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru September)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
• Wrack Material or Drift Lines
o Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Boehmeria cylindrica, Alnus serrulata
Important to Domestic Water Supply? Yes
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Yes
Perennial Channel (stop) . Important Channel: 60 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials:
Intermittent Channel proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Chattel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant chattel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd) r
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other than C.O.E. project manager
COUNTI'/CITY Guilford/High Point
P = Present SP= Strongly Present NP = Not Present 11/4/98
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: High Point Pipeline Relocation River Basin: Cape Fear County: Guilford
Evaluator: Catherine McRae, Suzanne Knudsen DWQ project No:
Nearest Named Stream: Richland Creek Date: 6/07/05
USGS QUAD: High Point East Lat: 35.9269°N Lon: 79.9233°W
LOcatioll/Directions: Unnamed Tributary to Richland Creek, southwest of intersection or Checker Road and Joplin Drive.
Stream ID: Stream Crossing 2 (SA-2)
;J PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream--
this rating system should not be used*
P121MARY FIELD INDICATORS: (CirdeOneNuolber)'erLine)
I. C.eomornhologv
Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 (D 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic Flood lain 0 1 3
6) Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present 0 1 2 3
10) Is A 2"` Order Or Greater Channel (As
Indicated On Topo Map And/Or In Field)
Present :'
No <D
Yes = 3
NU I I:: 11 lied & bank l aused liy Udc""tg And W1 I HUU I Sinuosity I ncn Score=U")
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 9
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge 0 1 2O 3
Present?
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
III. Bioloi!v Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present hi Streambed? 3 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 1 _ 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present'? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4
SECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Ch-cit,OneNnoiberPerLhw)
L Geomorpholouv Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There a Head Cut? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Is There a Grade Control Present in 0 .5 0 1.5
Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate a Natural 0 .5 1 1.5
Drainage Way?
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2.5
11. Hydrology
Absent Weak Moderate StronLj
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter Present
1.5
1
O
0
in Streambed?
2) Is Sediment (or) Debris Present on Plants? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water in Channel and >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (Note: If ditch indicated in No. 9 0 .5 O 1.5
above, ski this step and No. 5 below*
5) Is There Water Present in Channel during 0 .5 O 1.5
Dry Conditions or in Growing Season?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in Sides of Yes - 1.5 No - 0
Channel or in Head Cut?
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 5
III. Bioloev Absent
Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? .5 1 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus
Present`? O 5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
SAV Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly
OBL FACW FAC FACU UPI,
8) Are Wetland Plants in Streambed? 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
f 1, N011,: l/ loin/ Absence 0/A1/ Plants In Streambed As Noted Above Skip Ibis Step UNLESS SA I/ Pres('nt").
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = 23.5
(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
Signature:
' ?INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM ?` flaw i
ACTION ID SA-2 APPLICANT NAME Piedmont Natural Gas DATE 6/07/05
PROPOSED CHANNEL NVORIC (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) Utility line crossing
VATERBODWRIVER BASIN Unnamed tributary to Richland COUNTY/CITY Guilford
Cree]VCape Fear
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Sunny, dry, warm (871F)
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present
e Benthic Macro i n vertebrates isopods, scuds, dragonflv larvae
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae and/or Fungus (water quality function) fungus
u Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, other) Raccoon tracks
e Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) None identified
d Riffle/Pool Structure
Stable Streanrbanks
o Channel Substrate (i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand) cobble
Riparian Canopy Present (SP=/> 50% Closure) Betula nigra
Undercut Banks/hnstream Habitat Structure
o Flow in Channel weak
Wetlands Adjacent to/Contig. With Channel
(Discontinue)
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June thru
September)
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru September)
Q Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Betula nigra, Panicum virgatunn, Boehnreria cylindrica
Important to Domestic Mlater Supply? Yes
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Yes
Perennial Channel (stop) . Important Char iel: 60 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials:
rz Intermittent Channel proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Tluough Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Si natm*e: 7
(if other than C.O.E. project manager

P = Present SP= Strongly Present NP = Not Present 11 /4/98
I CDWQ Stream Classifeation Farm
Project Name: High Point Pipeline Relocation River Basin: Cape Fear County: Guilford
Evaluator: Catherine McRae, Suzanne Knudsen DWQ project No:
Nearest Named Stream: Richland Creek Date: 6/07/05
USGS QUAD: High Point East Lat: 35.9275°N Lon: 79.92481W
Location/Directions: Unnamed Tributary to Richland Creel:, north of Checker Road and south of Interstate 85.
Stream ID: Stream Crossing 3 (SA-3)
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used=
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Lin')
1. Geomoruhologv
Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture hi Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 2 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5 Is There An Active (Or Relic Flood lain 0 1 2 3
6) is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present 0 1 2 3
10) Is A 2n Order Or Greater Channel (As
Indicated On Topo Map And1Or• In Field)
Present?
No <D
Yes = 3
N(31 L-: II tied & b2nK Uaused 13y unchmg Ana W1I HUU1 Sinuosity then Score=U")
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 8
IL Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge 0 1 2 O3
Present?
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3
III. Bioloav Absent Weak Moderate Strono
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4
SECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
[ (_'amm??-nhnlrtRV /??1lCPil Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There a Head Cut? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Is There a Grade Control Present in 0 Q 1 1.5
Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate a Natural 0 .5 (i 1
1.5
Drainage Way?
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1.5
II. Hvdrologv
Absent Weak Moderate Stronly
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter Present 1.5 (D .5 0
in Streambed?
2) Is Sediment (or) Debris Present on Plants? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water in Channel and >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (Note: If ditch indicated in No. 9 0 .5 Q 1.5
above, sl:i this step and No. 5 below*)
5) Is There Water Present in Channel during 0 .5 0 1.5
Drv Conditions or in Growing Season?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in Sides of Yes - 1.5 No = 0
Channel or in Head Cut?
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINT'S: 6
i1T_ Riolnav
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present?. 0 .5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus
Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
SAV Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly
OBL FACW FAC FACU UPI,
8) Are Wetland Plants in Strearnbed? 2 1 (.75 .5 0 0
1 ` NOTE: YTotal Absewce Of All Plants 6t Streambed As Noted Above Skzp 7hts Step UNLESSSAV Presenil).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2.25
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = 24.75
(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
Signature:

ACTION ID SA-3
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
APPLICANT NAME Piedmont Natural Gas
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) Utility line crossing
Y
DATE 3/07/05
X4'ATERBODY/RI\7ER BASIN Unnamed tributary to Richland COUNTY/CITY Guilford
Creek/Cape Fear
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Sunny, dry, warm (871F)
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
e Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present
Benthic Macroinvertebrates
• Amphibians Present/Breeding
9 Algae and/or Fungus (water quality function)
e Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, other)
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) None identified
• Riffle/Pool Structure
e Stable Streambanks
o Channel Substrate (i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand) Coarse sand, gravel
e Riparian Canopy Present (SP=/> 50% Closure) Salix nigra, Liquidanibar so vac ua
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
Flow in Channel Very slow flow
Wetlands Adjacent to/Contig. With Channel
(Discontinue)
e Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June thru
Se tember) N/A - March sample
e Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru September) N/A -March sample
Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
Hydroph34ic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Boehmeria cplindrica, Salix nib a, Liquidambar
s[yraci flux
Important to Domestic Water Supply? Yes
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? No
Perennial Channel (stop) Ifl Important Channel: 60 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials:
o Intermittent Channel proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of iniportantlunimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd) „
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other than C.O.E. project manager
P = Present SP= Strongly Present NP = Not Present 11/4/98
Protected Species Assessment
? S
k
S&ME
July 22, 2005
Piedmont Natural Gas
P.O. Box 33068
Charlotte, North Carolina 28233
Attention: , Herb Jeans, P.E.
Reference: Protected Species Assessment
High Point Pipeline Relocation
Guilford County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
Dear Mr. Jeans:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to submit the results of the Protected Species Assessment
recently performed on a proposed natural gas pipeline relocation project in Guilford County,
N.C. (Exhibit 1). The proposed realignment originates at an existing pipeline approximately 500
linear feet (lf) east of the terminus of Joplin Drive, southeast of Interstate 85 in Guilford County,
N.C. and proceeds southwest along the proposed route for the realignment of N.C. Highway 311,
and ends west of the terminus of Windcreek Court (Exhibit 2). This work was performed in
- accordance with-S&ME Proposal No. 1357-15204-05, dated May 20, 2005. The opinions
included in this report are based on the information obtained during the study and our
professional experience. This letter summarizes observations made on the dates noted using the
procedures described herein, within the study corridor outlined on Exhibits 2 and 3. Summaries
of the professional experience of the botanist that conducted the scope of services summarized in
this letter report and of S&ME's reviewer have been included as an attachment to this report.
The coordinates at the northern terminus of the study corridor are approximately 35.9324°N,
79.9177oW and the coordinates at the southern terminus are approximately 35.9279°N,
79.9263°W. The study corridor is included on a portion of the High Point East, NC USGS
SWE, Inc. [phone]
9751 Southern Pine Blvd. [phone] fax
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273-5560 www.smeinc.com
Protected Species Review
Proposed High Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
July 22, 2005
topographic map (Exhibit 2). Specifically, the field review was limited to an approximately 60-
foot wide area encompassing 30 feet on either side of the proposed centerline, as staked in the
field. Included with this letter are a Site Vicinity Map (Exhibit 1), and portions of the applicable
USGS Topographic Map (Exhibit 2). Endangered and threatened species are protected under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1543). Endangered species are defined
as those plants and animals whose prospects of survival are in immediate danger. Threatened
species are those species that may become endangered if conditions related to their existence
continue to deteriorate (e.g.,. loss of suitable habitat). The purpose of this protected species
review and vegetative communities assessment is to evaluate whether current conditions along
the study corridor are suitable for those protected terrestrial species (plants and animals
occurring on land) whose presence may be currently or historically documented in Guilford
County, to.determine if those species known to occur in the vicinity of the study corridor are
present at the time of field review, and to provide a general description of vegetative
communities identified along the study corridor.
Scope of Services
S&ME's review of potential protected species habitat and vegetative communities in the study
corridor consisted of two tasks. Task.1 entailed a review of existing records obtained from
federal and state sources to identify documented records of protected terrestrial species within
the study corridor. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) webpage wa s
consulted for a listing of protected terrestrial species documented within Guilford County, N.C.
Task 2 involved a literature and field review of the study corridor to identify areas that may
provide potential habitat for the protected terrestrial species identified during Task 1. Task 2
included a review of topography, soil types, level of disturbance, and plant community types.
Study Methods
Review of the NCNHP webpage for records of protected terrestrial species within Guilford
County, N.C. identified listed terrestrial species and their respective Federal and State status.
2
Protected Species Review
Proposed High Point Pipeline Relocation

S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
. July 22, 2005
The findings of the webpage review are presented in Table 1. Explanations of Federal and State
codes are included at the end of the table. Please note that this assessment did not include a field
review for protected aquatic species.
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Bald eagle
'FABLE? I
PRO FFC"I F ` TRRESTRLIL SPECIES StAINIARY
Species Federal Status State Status
T-PD
E
T = Threatened, E = Endangered, PD = Proposed de-listed
During field reconnaissance, S&ME personnel integrated the information obtained during the
literature review with field evaluation-for the presence of protected terrestrial species or potential
protected species habitat. Portions of the study area that matched descriptions of preferred
habitat for protected terrestrial species listed in Table 1 were classified as potential habitat for
protected terrestrial species. An assessment of potential habitat for protected terrestrial species
in the study corridor was conducted by performing a field review on June 6 and 7, 2005.
Existing Study Area Conditions and Habitat Characterization
S&ME conducted an inventory of existing site conditions and dominant vegetative community
types in the study area. Photographs of the study area are included as an attachment to this
report. Vegetative communities in the study area were distinguished by plant species, location in
the landscape, past disturbances and hydrologic characteristics.
Habitat in the study corridor is limited to open fields, active pasture, areas recovering from
clearing, and narrow riparian corridors. Vegetation observed along the alignment during field
review included soybeans (Glycine max), ragweed (Ambrosia artemesiia), sericea lespedeza
(Lespedeza cuneata), fescue (Festuca sp.), blackberry (Rubus sp.), and black cherry (Prunus
3
Protected Species Review
Proposed High Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
July 22, 2005
serotina). Wetland areas along the corridor were primarily vegetated with false nettle
(Boehmeria cylindrica), lurid sedge (Carex lurida), and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum).
Forested wetlands additionally had sweetgum (Liquidambar stryaciflua), box elder (Acer
negundo), and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana).
Protected Flora and Fauna
The NCNHP database identified one federally or state-protected species with a documented
population in Guilford County, as identified in Table 1. A habitat assessment was conducted on
June 6 and 7, 2005 for this species. A description of this species, and typical habitat associated
with it is provided below.
Bald eagle - State Listed Endangered. Federally Listed Threatened
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
The bald eagle is associated with coasts, rivers, and lakes, usually nesting near large bodies of
water where it feeds. Nesting habitat in the southeast usually occurs in pine or cypress trees.
The bald eagle is listed as a current record for Guilford County. The proposed project is located
in close proximity to Interstate 85 and is not in the vicinity of large bodies of water or otherwise
appropriate habitat for the bald eagle. Consequently, the proposed project is not anticipated to
impact the bald eagle or its habitat.
Results
No bald eagles were observed during field review. Additionally, the proposed project will not
impact habitat that may be considered suitable for the bald eagle. In summary, a review of
protected terrestrial species known to occur in Guilford County, N.C. identified one bird species.
The study corridor was field-reviewed for the presence of this species. No protected terrestrial
species were observed during field review.
4
1 .s
' Protected Species Review
Proposed High Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
July 22, 2005
We hope that this letter addresses concerns you may have regarding the potential for impacts to
protected species in the study corridor. Should you have any questions or require additional
information, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
(?? m y,
Catherine McRae, C.E.
Natural Resources Project Manager
CAM/LJB/cam
Attachments:. Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map
Exhibit 2: USGS Topographic Map
Exhibit 3: Aerial Photograph
Photographs
Relevant Experience of Preparers
Lisa Beckstro , W.B., C.E.
Natural Resources Department Manager
5
t y ?
a tiAA?'aIV[S?a . ` i Kvey+ 1ht$
BuIlRun Gm daver
6 8? j>,ve?; P
akdt?le h _ PS
e
cedrowDr
?yoa
f

htcmtlfeu Ave i KhKrr2lm craasraad ,
(313, M
t
i
hb
oH y
i
??r
9
r?
ribb(n
4
4
co ob
Brwcruh
f.
d
Levnatd Ave
Rd
i
H
gh Point Cr,anz9?u take

c? ', Must ssraad?`
3i»nv Ytll#gs r
O
4
hl
cl' .
`°* Q a rswa?anoil

$p?rirr?6sld ??
\
Pous
?
? 9
?... t
\ AHon Jay

t
_.
!eta@'l tit _
E( dul ;Archdale _.
P-;
- ,. _. _..._ ....._ Guilford

'
Randulph
- n Caitraa4s MNI ;
- r,
R
7rinilp.

y 62 Pragrsss ?" `"'
?

113
RQ .0
.1apQuest,com, Inc.; 0 2005 GaT, Inc _
Approximate Study Area
Scale: As Shown SITE VICINITY MAP Exhibit

4
'
Checked by: LJB 6, &
0 SM
* PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
--
Guilford County, North Carolina 1
Drawn by:
DES ENGINEERING • TESTING
MENTAL SERVICES
ENVIRON
Date: 6-2-05 Project No.: 1357-05-386
l 1 ? ?
{
i
.14
Approximate Study Corridor 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Rii
Source: mm.tooozone.com, High Point East, 1993.
Scale: As Shown Exhibit
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Checked by: LJB PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Drawn by: DES Guilford County, North Carolina 2
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Date: 06-2-05 Project No.: 1357-05-386
?_ '` ???tIU•?e `-`, r?'+
"• f ??
L L ??.? 4? ? ;;cam. ?? ? '
i .r"? ?? ? .?
/ fr o.,-.'.r
i

? ? l fP _
ja '1j
Y/ , ? I~1 ?1
f ? 1 ?
fi
f ?r
?? A
? r
? `y
?? ? 4 `.
Y •
34? • ,?
`
1 -- `` (>?r? ? /i 333 \\\
t

??1 ?... ',r?. - y! `±y ?._ ? ! • 4_1 ? ? _ ?.}. lam. ( mow..

" ? ; ?-.
ill' ;l?'?, 1? y
? o •.,-
? -f?`r

,,_,•a1} f.l ?t ? °1'+ ` f •ra•
3
yl ?• • 2. ?. .?.
?•• i?.• ?;

• • r e ? ?
? ?a r'/ ? ?L, ?i

e i ?-? ! te
.
y 1 S ? ?
{
It ? \+
r
- Stream Channel
Scale: As Shown
Checked by: LJB
Drawn by: CAM -y Iffm
Data: ENGINEERING • TESTING
(1164711.(1F ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
1998 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Guilford County, North Carolina
Exhibit
3
t
i .. :
I.r
:,
Photo 1: Facing southeast across pond at northeastern
limits of corridor.

77

r k• ? Yew k?v,by _

ar ??; of i x%! zr? r?.

Photo 5: Facing north towards Checker Road across
soybean field.
Date: 6/6/05 & 6/7/05
Taken by: CAM
Checked by: l_JB
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Guilford County, North Carolina
Project No.: 1357-05-386
Photo 2: Typical view of vegetation along proposed
alignment.
Photo 3: Facing northeast along existing alignment
off Joplin Drive.
Photo 4: View of typical wetland along alignment.
Photo 6: Typical stream corridor along alignment.
? y r f
• 5
Relevant Experience of Personnel Involved in the Protected Species Assessment
Lisa J. Beckstrom, C.W.B., C.E., Natural Resources Department Manager
M.S. Biology - UNC Charlotte; B.S. Biology - UNC Chapel Hill
Project Role - Quality Assurance Review
Ms. Beckstrom is a Certified Wildlife Biologist and Certified Ecologist. She has 11 years of
experience in ecological studies and environmental assessments. Her experience includes
project management; NEPA/SEPA environmental assessments; linear corridor studies;
environmental constraints mapping; wetland determinations and delineations utilizing.U.S.
Army Corps of Engineer (USACE) methodology, and stream assessments utilizing USACE
and N.C. Division of Water Quality methodology; wetland and stream permitting; wetland
mitigation; agency coordination; and biological assessments.
Catherine A. McRae, Natural Resources Project Manager
M.S. Biology - UNC Charlotte; B.S. Biology - UNC Chapel Hill
Project Role - Field Review
Ms. McRae has over six years of experience in protected species surveys, ecological studies
and environmental assessment. Her experience includes plant ecology research, protected
species study and management, Natural Heritage inventory surveys, stream assessment,
habitat management, and prairie, stream, and wetland restoration and monitoring; and plant
community identification and assessment. She is additionally proficient in plant keying and
the use of technical plant identification manuals. Her field experience includes
environmental assessments, habitat management, and prairie, stream, and wetland mitigation
and monitoring, including extensive experience in the areas of protected species study and
management, with past work focusing on smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata),
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), and dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis
nanijlora).
`ti __j
#-- S&ME
July 22, 2005
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Attention: Mr. Todd Tugwell
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260
Attention: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
20051426
1(sLi JUL 2 'r 2005

DENR - VX-ER QUAUTY
yyETt.ANDS A14D STORMATER BRA14CH
Reference: Nationwide Permit No. 12
Piedmont Natural Gas - High Point Pipeline Relocation
Guilford County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
Dear Mr. Tugwell and Ms. Karoly:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) wishes to submit an application for impacts to waters of the United States
in accordance with Department of the Army Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12. Our client,
Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), is proposing to re-locate approximately one mile of gas pipeline in
Guilford County, NC to accommodate a new interchange on Interstate 85 planned by the N.C.
Department of Transportation (NCDOT). Accordingly, PNG will be considered the applicant for
this permit. Please find enclosed the following:
• A completed Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) and Letter of Authorization to Act as
Agent
S&ME, Inc. [phone]
9751 Southern Pine Blvd. [phone] fax
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273-5560 www.smeinc.com
Nationwide Pen-nit No. 12
High Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Project Number 1357-05-386
July 22, 2005
• Appropriate Exhibits - Site Vicinity Map (Exhibit 1); USGS Topographic Map (Exhibit
2); Soil Survey Map (Exhibit 3); Approximate Stream Crossing and Wetland Locations
Map (Exhibit 4); and Lower Randleman Buffer Zones Map (Exhibit 5).
• Typical Stream and Wetland Involvement Figures
• Stream Crossings and Classifications Table
• Wetland Survey Sheets
• Photographs
• Routine Wetland Determination Form, USACOE Intermittent Channel Evaluation Forms,
NCDWQ Stream Assessment Forms
• Protected Species Assessment
• Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Processing Check - $200
Background Information
PNG plans to relocate approximately one mile of natural gas pipeline. The project originates at
an existing PNG pipeline in Guilford County southeast of Interstate 85 and approximately 500
linear feet (10 east of the end of Joplin Drive. The proposed project involves temporary impacts
to four wetland areas and three crossings of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. A pond located near
the northern terminus of the project will be directionally bored. The coordinates at the northern
terminus of the study corridor are approximately 35.9324°N, 79.9177°W and the coordinates at
the southern terminus are approximately 35.9279°N, 79.9263°W. The location of the project
corridor is depicted in Exhibit 1.
Impacts to waters of the U.S. are limited to temporary impacts associated with disturbance to
wetlands and streams during construction of the proposed pipeline. The impacts will result from
excavation of a trench, placement of the pipe, and then restoration of the affected portion of the
stream and wetland areas to original grades and contours. Stream crossings may additionally
entail placement of riprap below ordinary high water for stabilization purposes. The
approximate impacts of the proposed work are depicted on Exhibit 4 (Approximate Stream
Crossings and Wetland Locations) and the attached wetland survey sheets.
2
Nationwide Permit No. 12 S&ME Project Number 1357-05-386
High Point Pipeline Relocation July 22, 2005
Field Observations
S&ME wetlands professionals conducted a field reconnaissance of the study corridor on June 6
and 7, 2005. The purpose of the field reconnaissance was to determine the presence or absence
of jurisdictional wetlands or waters of the U.S. within the study corridor. The delineation was
conducted utilizing currently accepted methods for wetland determination, as set forth in the
1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) Manual for Identifying and Delineating
Wetland Areas, which states that under normal circumstances, an area must demonstrate the
presence of three components to be considered jurisdictional: 1) hydrophytic vegetation, 2)
hydric soils and 3) wetland hydrology.
The scope of S&ME's work also included assessment of strearns in the study corridor. These
strearn assessments were conducted in accordance with the N.C. Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) and USACOE guidelines.
Conditions along the study corridor are depicted by Photos 1-6 (attached). Stream crossing
numbers, approximate geographic coordinates, and average widths are provided in the attached
table. Stream crossing locations are presented in Exhibit 4.
Protected Species
On June 6 and 7, 2005, S&ME conducted an assessment for potential habitat for protected
species along the study corridor, and determined that, based on the literature and pedestrian field
review, no potential habitat for protected species occur along the study corridor. No protected
species were observed during the field review. A copy of the Protected Species Assessment,
with details of methodology and findings, has been included with this PCN application.
Nationwide Permit No. 12 S&ME Project Number 1357-05-386
High Point Pipeline Relocation July 22, 2005
Delineation Results
Based upon S&ME's findings, jurisdictional wetlands will be impacted at four locations along the
proposed aligiunent (Exhibit 4). The temporary wetland impact areas total approximately 0.09
acre. Wetland types along the study corridor are limited to two emergent areas and two forested
areas. Typical vegetation observed in these wetland types is described in further detail below.
Typical Emergent Wetland: Wetland vegetation consisted of an herbaceous layer of lurid sedge
(Carer lurida), switchgrass (Panicum virgatunz), and false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica).
Typical Forested Wetland: Wetland vegetation consisted of a canopy of sweetgum (Liquidantbar
sl.vraciflua) with a subcanopy of box elder (Acer negundo) and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana).
Vines observed during field review included Virginia creeper (Partlienocissus quinquefolia) and
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). The herbaceous layer was comprised of switchgrass,
Japanese bamboo grass (Microstegiuni vimineum), and false nettle.
Locations of delineated wetland areas are identified on Exhibit 4, and on the attached wetland
survey sheets. Photos of the wetland areas and routine wetland determination forms are included as
an attaclurient to this submittal.
Iii addition to four wetland impact areas, the proposed High Point Pipeline Relocation project will
cross jurisdictional waters of the U.S. in three locations. Impacts to jurisdictional waters of the
U.S. include crossings of three intermittent, aquatically important channels. These crossings will
result in temporary impacts to approximately 0.03 acre of jurisdictional channel. Approximate
locations of these stream crossings are identified in Table 1 and on Exhibit 4 (attached). Stream
data forms are also included as an attachment to this submittal.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed project has been necessitated by a new interchange for N.C. Highway 311 on
Interstate 85. To accommodate the NCDOT project, PNG must relocate an existing gas pipeline
4
Nationwide Permit No. 12 S&ME Project Number 1357-05-386
High Point Pipeline Relocation July 22, 2005
that parallels Interstate-85. The alignment of the relocation has been determined by the planned
interchange. Consequently, there are no practicable alternatives to the proposed project.
PNG has designed the proposed project to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and waters of
the U.S. Avoidance and minimization efforts undertaken by PNG include directionally boring a
pond at the northern terminus of the project, just east of Joplin Drive and limiting impacts to 40
feet in width at stream crossings and wetland locations.
Regulatory Considerations
The construction corridor will be limited to 40 feet in width across stream channels. Placement
of riprap will be restricted to the stream bottom and banks directly impacted by the placement of
the water main. Riprap will only be used below the normal high water level, and placement of
nprap will not result in de-stabilization of the stream bed or banks upstream or downstream of
the crossing. Following construction, stream crossings will be restored to original grade and
elevation. The proposed project will not result in permanent changes in pre-construction
elevation contours or stream dimension, pattern or profile. Excess material will be removed to a
high ground disposal area. Because the re-alignment has been dictated by the design of the
NCDOT interchange, two of the three stream crossings are not perpendicular to the channel.
Consequently, PNG is submitting this PCN to DWQ for approval.
Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices equaling those outlined in the most recent
version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual"
shall be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation,
operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to assure compliance
with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard. Sediment and erosion control measures
placed in waters will be removed and the original grade restored within two months after the
Division of Land Resources has released the project. Impacts have been avoided and minimized
to the maximum extent practicable, and appropriate measures will be taken during construction
to ensure that the flow and circulation patterns of waters of the U.S. remain unaffected to the
extent practicable.
5
Nationwide Permit No. 12
High Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Project Number 1357-05-386
July 22, 2005
Based on our experience with similar projects involving impacts permitted through NWP 12, it is
our understanding that impacts to streams and wetlands resulting from construction of the
proposed project will be considered temporary if these areas are restored to original pre-
construction contours once construction is completed. Impacts associated with the proposed
project fall below the 0.5 acre threshold for NWP 12. Accordingly, this PCN for NWT 12 is
being submitted to the USACOE for approval. S&ME completed the PCN on behalf of PNG for
submittal to the USACOE.
Mitigation
We do not anticipate that our client will be required to provide compensatory mitigation since
the impacts are temporary in nature, and avoidance and minimization efforts have been
undertaken in the plamling process.
Additionally, it is our understanding, based on previous experience with similar projects, that the
avoidance and minimization procedures implemented during the design phase of the proposed
High Point Pipeline Relocation, including the use of directional boring in some locations, should
be considered adequate mitigation for this project.
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written concurrence
with this NWP 12 permit application. If we can provide additional infonmation or answer
questions you may have, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Catherine McRae, C.E.
Natural Resources Project Manager
11-4
Lisa J. Beckstrom, C.E., C.W.B.
Natural Resources Department Manager
CAM/LJB/cam
Attachments
cc: Herb Jeans, Manager - Construction, Piedmont Natural Gas
6
Letter of Authorization to Act as Agent
and Pre-Construction Notification
JUL. -0E., 05 (WED) 15:35 P.002
'_TUL-oa-Qis 12-11 Fr Q1"e E s AND D, 70A.52EMIS3
LETTER F AUTHORIZATION
TO ACT AS AGENT
1
i
S&ME-Project Name:
S&ME Project No.
Type of Project:
Location;
Business Name:
Bailing Address:
City; State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Contact;
Business Name:
Street Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone No.
Contact:
Authorization:
Rrojact Infcrma o f
Piedmont Natural Gas Hig'I Paint Pipeline Relocation
1357-05-386
Wetland Dplineatlon
Linear utility corridor project Irt Guliford County, NC
1 -
•op®r r Own®rlAppiicant
Piedmont Natural Gas
P.G. Box 33066
Charlotte, NO, 28233
[phone]
Mr. Herb Jeans, P.E.
A®ant Informatio?I
S&ME, Inc. -
9751 Southern Pine Boule?ard
Charlotte, NC 28273
[phone]
Catherins McRae
i
I on behalf of
Plsdmont Nj t_ rah I Gas, herby authorizza
(Nsme of Apps. ant)
S&ME, Inc. to act as ageni for the above-mentioned project.

"t
rd T
4
Office Use Only: Form Versi n May 2002
2005146
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to tits project, please enter iwt Appitcaule or 1-411-3 .)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested
12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check L-erm r A p LI??
LI V D
II. Applicant Information JUL 2 7 2005
Owner/Applicant Information DENR • WATER QUALI-1Y
Name: Herb Jeans, P.E., Manaqer of Construction}'ETLANDSANDSt' ATERB y
Mailing Address: Piedmont Natural Gas
P.O. Box 33068
Charlotte, NC 28233
Telephone Number: 704.731.4422 Fax Number: 704.731.4098
E-mail Address: herb.ieans -piedmontnmcom
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Catherine McRae, C.E.
Company Affiliation: S&ME, Inc.
Mailing Address:. 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte. NC 28273
Telephone Number: 704.523.4726 Fax Number: 704.525.3953
E-mail Address: cmcrae(a?smeinc.com
Page I of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Naive of project: High Point Gas Pipeline Relocation Project
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A- linear pipeline project
4. Location
7
County: Guilford Nearest Town: High Point
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Interstate 85, exit onto
N.C. Highway 62 heading east. Turn left onto Checker Road. Turn left onto Joplin
Drive and proceed to dead end. Northern terminus of project is approximately 500
linear feet east of the end of Joplin Drive.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): See attached Table 1
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Approximately 7.3 acres (total right-of-way including temporary
work space)
Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Richland Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at htlp:Hl12o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/,.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing conditions and land use along the route vary
from agricultural fields, pasture, pockets of wooded areas, and rural residential areas.
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed proiect involves the relocation of approximately one mile of natural gas
pipeline along the eastern side of Interstate 85 in Guilford County. The pipeline will
be ioined by welding and will then be lowered into a ditch and backfilled. Equipment
to be used on the iob includes trackhoes, dozers trucks, sidebooms, welding rigs
and boring machines
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to relocate an
existing gas pipeline to accommodate the future construction of Highway 311 and a
new interchange with Interstate 85.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
NIA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, pennanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation snap, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed impacts include
temporary placement of fill in four wetland areas (see below). Additionally, temporary
impacts to streams will occur during construction at three locations (see attached
Table 1). Jurisdictional areas impacted by construction of the proposed proiect will
be restored to original grades and contours upon completion of the proiect.
Page 3 of 8

2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
-
A Temp. fill 0.02 No - 200 feet forested
B Temp. fill 0.05 No adjacent forested
C Temp. fill 0.02 No adjacent emergent
D Temp. fill <0.01 No - 500 feet emergent
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.eov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: approximately
0.12 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09 acre (within 40-foot construction easement)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) linear feet Before Impact (please secif )
See attached Table 1 for Stream Impacts
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.cov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.coni,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: temporary impacts to
120 If of channel (40-foot maximum width per crossing).
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact ' (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A - No impacts to open waters are anticipated
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
Page 4 of 8

If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embanlnlient, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stonnwater requirement, etc.): NIA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NIA Expected pond surface area: NIA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) ,
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The Droaosed Droiect has been necessitated by a new interchange for N.C. Hiqhwav 311
on Interstate 85. To accommodate the NCDOT project, PNG must relocate an existing
gas pipeline that parallels Interstate 85. The alignment of the relocation has been
determined by the planned interchange. Consequently, there are no practicable
alternatives to the proposed project.
PNG has designed the proposed project to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and
waters of the U.S. Avoidance and minimization efforts undertaken by PNG include
directionally boring a pond at the northern terminus of the project, Oust east of Joplin
Drive and limiting impacts to 40 feet in width at stream crossings and wetland locations.
Additionally, impacts to wetlands and streams will be temporary, and original grades and
contours will be restored upon completion of construction. A pond at the northern
terminus of the project will be directionally bored to minimize impacts to waters of the
U.S. Riprap will be used only when considered necessary , and will be restricted to the
area below ordinary high water. Major creek crossings may use temporary bridqes
spanning the banks of the channel to facilitate movement of construction equipment.
Culverts or pipes will not be used.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - hi accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
.y
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic enviromnent are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.el-ir.state.nc.us/newetlands/stnnizide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Based on conversations with the USACOE for recent similar projects, we anticipate
that appropriate mitigation for the proposed project will be limited to avoidance and
minimization procedures implemented during the design phase of the proposed
project. Minimization measures include utilizing directional bore methods for a pond
at the northeastern terminus of the proiect. Impacts resulting from the proposed
proiect are temporary. Original grades and contours will be restored in wetland areas
and at creek crossings.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 6 of 8
1
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Envirommental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify, )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 7,200 3 N/A - exempt
2 4,800 1.5 N/A - exempt
Total 12,000 N/A - exempt
* Zone I extends out 3U feet perpendicular from near banK of cnannel; Lone z extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
NIA
Page 7 of 8

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
N/A.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
A
Appl (J Dat?(e
ican Agent' Signature
(Agent's signature ' id only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

Exhibits 1 - 5
. ?r
MAPaV zT
? suit Run Grandover Pkwy
rr 1mi
0
k
`
... Ave ?r
0
L akdala, 1
s{ h yettQ?

htuntlieuAve : Q
i Irktrtn Grassroad
1Mlbarrr?
t? rOe 0o Brunch ?s L
?,Leonatd Ave -
±l
? High Point Tnan?e lp3te Rd ``? .' -
q
o ? ? . r csrw?d? ?
`has
4 Sh* Villo jo

d n

Rtc
h?
r??k? 'fiftri cy mman Mill

s?rlr tisid
Foust Ave 9ak•rtawn
2? Y Albin Jay
t
62
lfor cn
_Csli
m
_
fr Randc.,lf,a,_ rArGhdale C,s tlforcl
v Randolph
?•
;. c -
_ p coUranas MillU

'Trinity
d
f C +si<
l
{utL

62 1
Pragr.ss? aa?

0 2005 GOT
I ?
,
nc
iaPQuest,com. Inc.;
Approximate Study Area
Scale: As Shown
SITE VICINITY MAP Exhibit

Checked by: LJB PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
'qu
Drawn by: Guilford County, North Carolina 1
DES ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Date: 6-2-05 Project No.: 1357-05-386
> r
r (.

?

`` I%

l• `
I re
X11 J

-
r

1T r _,`? /? r r
0, rrj)'?jir
I
-? l ? ,?'?"/,.-•_.?

? .• ? ? ;l , "'?.

! _., '
.'/
? ? .?tf ?' ?J--j??' 1 fit' ? y _1

?.
?. e 1
1:
1 ?
?-,
•
.
+
f' ! fit
I
? •'. ?? ?
?4
?. ?.? .....:
• `4 ?
1
?
j?1 j d
/ tip. ? f
f? ? ,

21

162. 1
1
r
emmmm Approximate Study Corridor 0
Source: www.topozone.com, High Point East, 1993.
Scale: As Shown
Checked by: LJB &N 0
Drawn by: DES
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
' Date: 06-2-05
6.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mi
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP I Exhibit
PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Guilford County, North Carolina
Project No.: 1357-05-386
s
Approximate Study Corridor
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ Approximate Location of Interstate 85
EnB Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slope
EnC Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slope
EnD Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slope
Wh Wehadkee silt loam
Source: Guilford
As Shown
Checked by: LJB
Drawn by: DES
Date: 06-2-05
Soil Survey, 1977
SM
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
SOIL SURVEY MAP I Exhibit
PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Guilford County, North Carolina
Project No.: 1357-05-386
R'
GIS website
ZAF? `'

Cale: As Shown APPROXIMATE STREAM CROSSINGS AND Exhibit
WETLAND LOCATIONS MAP
Checked b : LJB PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Drawn by: CAM WM - Guilford County, North Carolina 4
ENGINEERING - TESTING
rate. nn n.q nc ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Proiect No.: 1357-05-386
P-1-? Approximate Photograph Location and Direction
* Wetland Data Point
fi Stream Assessment
Jurisdictional Stream Channel

LEGEND
0
G?

r- ' Randleman Buffer
tChecker R Zone 2 (20')
? D
Proposed Pipeline
J Relocation
f Existing Pipeline
Alignment
General Location of
® Proposed Interchange
f NCDOT Project
e
500 250 0 500

THE ABOVE GIS DATA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE GUILFORD COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT WEBSITE. THE LOCATION OF THE UTILITY EASMENTS WERE APPROXIMATED
INFORMATION FROM PNG. PLEASE NOTE THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PROPERTIES ONLY. IT IS NOT FOR DESIGN, LEGAL, OR ANY OTHER PURPOSES. THERE
NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. S&ME, INC ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DECISION MADE OR ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON
INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE ABOVE DATA.
SCALE
AS SHOWN
DATE:
07/20/05
PROJECT N0: DRAWN BY. CHECKED BY:
1357-05-386 DRA LJB
- Streams and Ponds
Randleman Buffer
Zone 1 (30')
SM 9751 SOUTHERN PINE BLVD
CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28273
PH. 704-523-4726
FAX. [phone]
ENGINEERING • TESTING WWW.SMEINC.C0rd
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Feet
Randleman Buffer Zones Map EXHIBIT
PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation 5
Guilford County, North Carolina
Wetland Crossing
Right of Way
Silt Fence
Wetland
.h
Bentonite Plug Bentonite Plug
Temporary Equipment
Crossing
Eq ipment Mats
Wetland
Silt Fence
atr. ,er. ,n m at. ,v. ,4. ?r
Right of Way
r
Stream Crossing
Wet Ditch Method (A)
Right of Way

Pipe
Pipeli
0°`0°-0°-0-0°-o
0000°00
0°0°0°0°0°0
00000000000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00000000000
Gravel Construction
Entrance
o°o°o°o°o°
0°0°0°0°0°
Trenchline Barrier
or Earthen Plug
o°o°o°o°o°o
00000000000
00000°°0000
00000000000
000000°000
0?00„0?0?00
Equipment Mats
ilt Fence
Rock Silt Screen
Stream
Temporary Equipment
Crossing
Right of Way

Stream Crossing
Wet Ditch Method (B)
Right of Way
Pipe Trench
Gravel Construction
Right of Way
Trenchline Barrier
or Earthen Plug
Rock Silt Screen
Stream Crossings and Classifications Table
Ia
I?O vn
00 0
M O
N
N
to
z
U
U
O
F.
P-?
W
ad
O
c?
U
O
z
0
U
O O
U
N U
1
0
z
a,
p? 'o
, a
0 4.1
?x
O
za
b
O

it ? o o
FF++
S S
v S
b y cN 4P, 40.

O o

40. 40, 4. o

y h1 O O O
0

y N N
42 N
l. 'b G
0 cd
V M N N c?
40
Cy .
n w

~ U
y
o ? O
??
x

S
w U
O 0
0000 0
M cn 0
00
00 vi p•'
to
o N
v
N rn oNj rn 0 to

O
0
U
o O
1.+ 0 0 0 U y
O -
ON CN ? rn
U
M M M
w
Ln >
o

U y
--•
N
M
W N
N
6 O
+?UZ a?
uoQu
N M
¢
V
Streaji Tablc ,- High Point
Subject: Stream Table - High Point
From: "Catherine McRae" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:48:38 -0400
To: <[e-mail]>
Laurie, sorry for the incomplete table. The attached table has been revised to
include columns listing temporary and permanent impacts. I also added a note at the
bottom identifying each of the streams as unnamed tributaries to Richland Creek.
Please let me know if you need additional information.
Thanks,
Catherine
Catherine McRae, C.E.
Project Manager ( Natural Resources Department
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard Charlotte, NC 28273
phone [phone] fax [phone]
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE
This electronic message including any attachments and other documents referred to
herein, contains information from S&ME, Inc. that may be legally privileged and/or
confidential. The information is intended for the proper recipient(s) only. Any
other use, review, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of, or
reliance on, this e-mail or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or
use of the contents is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error or
are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by reply or by telephone at
the number listed above and delete this electronic message and any attachments from
your computer.
Content-Type: application/msword
STREAM CROSSING TABLErev.doc
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 7/29/2005 7:49 AM
10 Ln
co 0
K', O
? N
?' nl
r nl
M
J
z
o
w
s
O
U
0
z
0
f?
?o
'J
OJ U
a 0
zv
c~
Za
Q
Ld
O C?
O Cd
O

M
N

."ry Fri U
yr L
CS w O
U y G

? v

CS Q ?` ?
b D ? g .C
?

1.

cl
d a
w
o u
cn
E_

Q 00
• M
M ?
,J. _?
O C

N .= cl
to 1
01 O? G?
0
o
Q O\ 01 G1 ,,,a ? U
O O O C U y

?? N 00 CN
l0 N
[? N y
N G ti
O .
c? ci U
'r, ^
M M M
i 3 w

`°
G 3

bA L
? 'y' O
? Cy U
. W
o -- N M a?
?VZ vo
N 17
Wetland and Stream Survey Sheets
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER, ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER, AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTLIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL."
NAME:
TITLE
l
SHAT 4

S
DATE:
AID:
SHEET 3 / /

SHEET 2

INTERSTATE 85

SHEET 5
z 1
1

INTERSTATE 85
SHEET 7
j SCALE 1"= 300'
• ? - • JOB NUMBER,: 03139-0007 NOTES: 0 150 300 600 900
DWG. NUMBER: WETLAND "404" SURVEY 1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 7 2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
8020 TOWER POINT DRIVE PROJ. SURVEYOR: O OF 3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28227 WAE
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone] DRAWN BY. JCD PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE 4. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&ME, INC.
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-PrET GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).
Internet Site: http://www.mckimcreed.com DATE• 0707/05
CAR
?oFESS;o
USER lY RD
SEAL.
9^ L•3413 0 ?
ORE
} SITE
W
J
J
,by
W
o
yg'0
r/r/'rrnnuuMCINITY MAP
(WT TO :^.N-e)
I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER, MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATUP,E.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.
W. ANDREW EADES PLS L-3413 DATE: 7-7-05
S'i E 6

I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER,
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.
W. ANDREW EADES
PLS L-3413
DATE: 7-7-05

"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER, ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTLIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL."
NAME:
TITLE:
? L15
L13
?A DATE:
?/ Iv AID:
4.89
L9 (TOTAL)
L20--
STREAM '00
155 sq. ft. j /
0.00 ACRES
co' N
L23
TOP OF BANK 0.23
oil L25
EXISTING-POND
TOTAL AREA
11,158 sq. ft.
x1p 0.26 ACRES
S 52'54'17" W
X13.08 102.43'
/
L21 1.35
EXISTING-POND
AREA INSIDE EASEMENT
a 4,775 sq. ft.
0.11 ACRES
S 52'54'17" W
77.81
12.45
L6
W.
., ;rrrrq
t4 SEAL
r L•3413 a =
%,1?,92? GUR??y04vc???\
'?'htpltl;tc•""
?,5
POND LIMITS
rv ?O
J
J
7?
v
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
RIGHT OF WAY
- - -- EXISTING R/N ---
J
1

o ?o
c
VICINITY MAP
(U.-,T TB e", r l
SITE
LINE TA BLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 47.31' N 09'12'45" W
L2 24.38' N 15'05'31" W
L3 38.80' N 36'10'35" W
L4 23.85' N 07'15'35" W
L5 22.77' N 28'40'17" E
L6 38.79' N 63'26'18" E
L7 18.00' S 81'33'46" E
L8 42.26' S 65'20'04" E
L9 17.97' S 28'01'46" E
L10 46.83' S 20'29'35" W
L11 37.53' S 06'45'35" W
L12 26.84' S 28'38'31" W
L13 23.42' S 54'08'14" W
L14 14.14' S 22'17'26" W
L15 11.27' S 45'38'11" W
L16 10.73' N 25'02'57" W
L17 3.25'
- N 03'19'00" E
L18 12.P
1 -S 43'47'07" E
L19 16.84' S 03'45'02" W
L20 6.92' S 40'27'33" W
L21 3.00' N 57'50'46" W'
L22 5.67' N 22'00'09" E
L23 13.37' N 03'45'02" E
L24 9.81' N 43'47'07" W
L25 5.00' N 46'12'53" E
NIw
?Iro
n
?I
14+00
6020 TOWER POINT DRIVE
Charlotte, North Carolina 28227
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
Internet Site: http://www.mckimcreed.com
f4-r 18.61
WETLAND TIE
JOB NUMBER: 03139-0007
DWG. NUMBER:
SHEET NUMBER,: 2 OF 7
ROJ. SURVEYOR: WAE
DRAWN BY. JCD
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-WET
)ATE: 07/07/05
15+00 SCALE 1"= 40'
0 20 40 80 120
NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
WETLAND "404" SURVEY 2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
OF 3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIM BILE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE 4, THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&ME, INC.
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).

-I -1-05?
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ?o - Ll - W/
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER, AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL." UBERTY
NAME:
? 5.19 ?;
TITLE:
L9 Q
v1`? ^"
co,
WETLAND A JI /? DATE:
AREA INSIDE EASEMENT WETLAND A
1,058 sq. ft. TOTAL AREA
0.02 ACRES 1,344 sq. ft.
/ 0.03 ACRES AID:
WETLAND LIMITS
RIGHT OF WAY ry ~
L10
rT \9 J _
9
10.24
I
I
I
I
wl
?I N
co N
SIN
?I
(n I
I
I
I
1 r7-00
11+27.78
AETL4ND TIE
I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER, MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.
W. ANDREW EADES PLS L-3413 DATE: 7-7-05
Y /
w
G
VICINITY MAP
"S T@ =L-_)
SITE
4'
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 35.86' S 13'40'18" W
L2 27.32' N 46'08'30" W
L3 20.37' N 41'28'30" W
L4 26.51' N 57'02'37" W
L5 23.59' N 60'41'47" E
L6 31.39' S 44'16'00" E
L7 9.00' S 76'30'04" E
L8 12.70' S 86'40'33" E
L9 30.44' S 19'01'29" W
L10 13.63' S 19'00'55" W
CAR, p
SEAL
;% r92 L-341-3
yo '
40
S, ?'•.SUR`1
r?r111 f I!I ',,,
19+00 SCALE 1"= 30'
.,..:..
0 15 30 60 90
JOB NUMBER: 03139-0007 NOTES:
F f
?,J ?&jZp\E??Lj DWG. NUMBER:
EY
D "
0
S 1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN! ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SHEET NUMBER: 3 OF 7 WETLAN
4
4
URV 2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
8020 TOWER POINT DRIVE PROJ. SURVEYOR: WAE OF 3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28227
DRAWN BY
JCD
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE
4.
THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE 404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&ME, INC.
Phone: [phone], Fa--: [phone] .
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-WET GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).
Internet Site: http://www.mckimoreed.com I DATE: D7
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER, AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTLIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL."
NAME:
TITLE:
DATE
AID
I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER,
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.
W. ANDREW EADES PLS L-3413
'3= 00
SCALE 1 "= 30'
_ _ _
0 15 30 60 90
_ -11-0
DATE: 7-7-05
,•aIII iIIiIIIr
?t? CA
p`
P.
?iESSIO...
4L SEAL 9r it
r L•3413c E
••:rrullnnlllt'
"? fsa L sy r
USERTY
} SITE
W
\?gh
0
O??yRR
c
10.69 j ( N?,eti
1.87 \5?,
- A?
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ?112 p L16 MICINI TY Fv"IAP
0
WETLAND B p / om TO h
AREA INSIDE EASEMENT 10.53 /ry /7
2,103 sq. ft./?` 0
0.05 ACRES /?_` L13/5
WETLAND B ?3?19
i STREAM 1 TAL \ L11 / 20554 sq Eft. AREA INSIDE 780 s EAf EMENT
I? 0.06 ACRES
/ 0.02 ACRES
RIGHT OF WAY --
o L23 12?i L21 ?? . . -
o I? .. LINE TABLE
J 'ui / LINE LENGTH BEARING
r 0 1g?? L1 21.22' N 80'12'03" YJ
/ L2 17.23' N 65'37'38" W
rnI /R' L3 13.53' N 29'52'37" W
WETLAND LIMITS L4 23.11' N 31'43'08" W
L5 22.64' N 39'35'38" W
TOP OF BANK L6 24.99' N 29'55'34" W
T L7 15.67' N 4217'49" W
L8 17.45' N 71'26'48" W
L9 12.30' N 79'14'24" E
L10 32.75' N 82'01'37" E
L11 15.59' S 03'01'07" W
L12 18.25' S 75'32'14" E
L13 48.45' S 03'26'16" E
co co L14 32.95' S 69'38'25" E
N L15 29.02' S 29'33'40" E
oI° L16 12.27' S 13'40'46" E
co L17 21.56' N 66'50'33" W
to L18 14.37' N 46'13'40" W
L19 6.12' N 3718'15" W
_ L20 34.93' N 52'02'32" W
L21 36.07' N 11'01'26" W
L22 24.71' S 12'57'13" E
i L23 33.26' S 09'42'28" E
r3+81.28
IIETL9A'D TIE
14+00
14
IVIL JOB NUMBER:

DWG. NUMBER: 03139-0007

» S
WETLAND „a
R NOTES:

1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
SHEET NUMBER: 4 OF 7 04
U
VEY 2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
8020 TOWER POINT DRIVE PP,OJ. SURVEYOR: WAE OF 3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28227
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
DRAWN BY.
JCD
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE
4.
THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&ME, INC.
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-WET GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).
Intemet Site: http://www.mckimcreed.com I DATE: 07
I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER, MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.
0
W. Al'

EW EADES PLS L-3413 DATE: 7-7-05
14+00
<'' ?tl CARP
s
SEAL S
- L-3413 r<•`
SUR?y6?:?5``..
''t'nnuliuttnt?`
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
U 11.73' S 35'14'15" W
L2 13.42' S 41'50'06" W
L3 13.98' S 20'04'02" W
L4 13.08' S 05'24'22" W
L5 3.47' N 55'22'19" W
L6 25.83' N 12'15'31" E
L7 10.55' N 25'12'45" E
L8 6.29' N 53'51'46" E
L9 9.73' N 30'53'53" E
L10 5.50' S 55'51'40" E
VICINITY MAP
em TO Svtp
SITE
14x3:;.98
TI ETI 1:1 D TIE
`p-IaIPD_
RIGHT OF WAY
of
N co
Lo
;n
MIS
U)
I
I
_?L10
a.
I
rnY I -J
co
e ?
rl ? ?
JI I
I I
?I
TOP OF BANK ?M
? I J
?i
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER, ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER, AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED, UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTLIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL."
STREAM 2
AREA INSIDE EASEMENT
197 sq. ft.
0.00 ACRES
NAME:
TITLE:
DATE:
- AID:

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT +m z

SCALE 1"= 30'

L5

4 q &a? JOB NUMBER:
NUMBER:
DWG 03139-0007
"
" NO
1. TES: 0 15 30 60 90
ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
.
WETLAND
404
SURVEY .
T
SHEET NUMBER: 5 OF 7 2. HIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
POINT DRIVE
TOWER
shoo PROJ. SURVEYOR: WAE _ OF 3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.

N
Chorfottete, North Cording 28227
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]
DRAWN BY:
JCD
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE
4.
THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&ME, INC.
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-W'ET GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 5. BASIS OF BEARING IS .NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).
r
w
J
J

USERTY RD I Intemet Site: In tlp://www.mckimcreed.com I DATE. D7

10+97.0.1
11'ETL.4/1D TIE 11+00
Cl1?0 '
?c ??oFESSro•???'''.
ti.
4 SEAL 9?'• =
92 L•3413 yo
/?o?E•w'??o,,,,
I 1 r 18.14 !!lnlgnnnlmltt??
JJETL.4.1D TIE
-PT.1IP D-
I
? I
\ ? I
Iz Iz
?? ?IJ ol°'
r ?ic1
Icn
?
1II1cIcl? cl;
I 1 I? I?
ro lI
i ml I
IIII WETLAND C I
I I TOTAL AREA I
I . I 1,468 sq. ft.
m l l 1 0.03 ACRES I
L9 _ _ _L10_ _ ti,E-TLAND LIMITS
RIGHT OF WAY _ _ _ _ ?L11) ?lbC1 'j
a
STREAM 3 \1.19
?ID
AREA INSIDE EASEMENT
284 sq. ft.
0.01 ACRES 3 ?g?!
C3 WETLAND C
AREA INSIDE EASEMENT
ti? L1 934 sq. ft.
0.02 ACRES
TOP OF BANK
PUBUC UTILITY EAS?I.IENT x L16
I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER, MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.

W. ANDREW EADES PLS L-3413
DATE: 7-7-05
}
0
j o
ct:
USERTY RD
VICINITY MAP
(°7f Ta S=,E)
SITE
LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING L13 16.14' S 09'17'00" E
L1 30.37' S 17'15'38" E L14 28.24' S 47'12'26" W
L2 15.02' S 49'15'14" W L15 14.34' S 26'33'35" W
L3 21.68' N 85'25'49" W L16 9.40' S 51'08'21" W
L4 7.95' N 59'54'23" W L17 5.21' S 33'38'41" W
L5 6.65' N 68'11'32" W L18 3.24' S 67'16'30" W
L6 8.48' S 33'04'52" W L19 1.28' N 37'13'31" W
L7 11.82' N 45'53'27" W L20 7.95' N 33'38'41" E
L8 12.58' N 14'02'44" E L21 9.21' N 51'08'21" E
L9 14.49' N 71'23'26" E L22 14.23' N 26'33'35" E
35.68' N 69'12'21" E L23 27.06' N 47'12'26" E
L 5.82' N 69'53'29" E L24 12.69' N 17'21'13" W
12 9.65' S 50'51'47" E L25 10.90' N 50'51'47" W
CURVE TABLE
CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD DELTA
C1 1066.27' 56.04' S 71'54'30" V1 56.03' 3'00'40"
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTLIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL."
NAME:
L19? `11
1 I TI TLE:
SCALE 1 = 30 DATE:
F- -1 ull
GQ .
0 15 30 60 90
AID:
?? JOB NUMBER:
DWG
NUMBER 03139-0007 NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
"? •" :
. WETLAND 404 SURVEY 2 30
THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47
MENDED
T I
RECORDATION
S
SHEET NUMBER: 6 OF 7 . -
, A
.
A
. NO
NTENDED FOR
8020 TOAcR POINT DRIVE PROD. SURVEYOR: .
WAE OF 3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER". METHODS.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28227
Phone: [phone], Fa;: [phone]
DRAWN BY:
JCD
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE
4.
THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 VJtTLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&ME, INC.
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-WET GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 83).
Internet Site: http://www..mckimcreed.com I DATE- 07/07
I, W. ANDREW EADES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER,
MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION.
THIS SURVEY IS OF A NATURAL FEATURE.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL
THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2005.
S
YJ. ANDREW EADES PLS L-3413 DATE: 7-7-05
95+83'99 %TIE
1V"ETL.?r
6+ p0 ?I
l ?
?N
?W
.41
'
?1r
7.26
5.41
Q E1 CA1?0
? oFEss/o' y
SEAL
L-3413 C?
v'',OSUR?4,'5
L3 (TOTAL) RIGHT OF WAY
1 \
L1 (TOTAL)
?2 \ 8.98
WETLAND D
TOTAL AREA WETLAND D
150 sq. ft. AREA INSIDE EASEMENT
0.00 ACRES 94 sq. ft. -
0.00 ACRES
PUBLIC UTIUTY EASEMENT
LINE TA BLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 16.24' S 02'18'48" E
L2 12.67' S 46'08'12" W
L3 17,17' N 00'09'07" W
L4 11.58' N 47'25'17" E
L5 10.65' N 55'46'35" E
25+00
a
/ VICINITY MAP
040T TO S°,x.q
SITE
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE
JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT IN THE AREAS IMPACTED BY THE PRESENT
PROPOSED ACTIVITY, AS. DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER, AREAS OF
JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A
CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404.
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE.
THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTLIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION
MANUAL."
NAME:
TITLE:
DATE:
AID:
SCALE 130'
0 15 30 60 90
.?-'
jj???
LV1°l??j? ?? JOB NUMBER:
DWG. NUMBER: 03139-0007 NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ARE IN FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

SHEET NUMBER:
7 OF 7 WETLAND 404 SURVEY 2. THIS MAP DOES NOT CONFORM TO GS 47-30, AS AMENDED. NOT INTENDED FOR RECORDATION.
8020 TOIkER POINT DRIVE PROJ. SURVEYOR: WAE OF 3. WETLANDS SURVEYED BY TRIMBLE "PATHFINDER" METHODS.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28227
Ph one: [phone], Fax: [phone] DRAWN BY. JCD PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS - HIGH POINT PIPELINE 4. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO SHOW THE "404 WETLAND" AS DELINEATED BY S&ME, INC.
COMPUTER FILE: PNG-HIGHPOINT-YET GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 5. BASIS OF BEARING IS NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83).
(
Internet Site: http://www..mckimcreed.com I DATE: 07/07
Site Photographs
Photo 1: Facing southeast across pond at northeastern
limits of corridor.
ro ei^ N
i
1
K
t
Photo 2: Typical view of vegetation along proposed
alignment.
f -?1?..i•?k ems s - ;
'? ? ? . ? ? .. x ?' a?? ? ?c.=,.air • w , ? #_
s m
Photo 5: Facing northwest at Stream Crossing 1. Photo 6: f=acing northeast at Stream Crossing 2.
Date: 6/6/05 & 6/7/05 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
*SM PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Taken by: CAM
Guilford County, North Carolina
Checked by: LJB EENGINEERING TESTING
SERVICES
Project No.: 1357-05-386
Photo 3: View of Wetland A.
Photo 4: View of Wetland B.
Wetland and Stream Data Forms
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DELINEATION
(1987 COE WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL)
Project/Site: High Point Pipeline Relocation Date: 6-06-2005
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas County: Guilford
Investigator: Catherine McRae/Suzanne Knudsen State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the Site? YES NO Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? YES NO Transect ID: Plot ID: DP-1
Is the area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse) YES NO Lat: 35.9288°N Lon: 79.92180W

VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Do minant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Carpinus caroliniana T FAC 8. Acer rubrum T FAC
2. Acer negundo T FACW 9.
3. Liquidambar styraciflua T FAC+ 10.
4. Parthenocissus quinquefolia v FAC 11.
5 Lonicera japonica v FAC- 12.
6. Panicum virgatum H FAC+ 13.
7. Boehmeria cylindrica H FACW+ 14.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OB L, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 7/8 known (87.5%)
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other
® No Recorded Data Available
I FIELD OBSERVATIONS I
Depth of Surface Water (in.) N/A
Depth to Free Water in Pit (in.) 4 inches
Depth to Saturated Soil (in.) 0
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology is present.
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines .
® Sediment Deposits
® Drainage Pattern in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
SOILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Enon fine sandy loam, 6 Drainage Class: Well-drained
to 10 percent slopes
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Ultic Hapludalfs Field Observations Confirm Mapped
Type? Yes ? No ?
PROFILE DESCRIPTION Community ID: Wetland
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-1 O
2-4 B1 10YR 3/3 10YR 4/4 few/distinct Sandy silt
j 4-12+ B2 G1 4/10Y Silty loam
i

HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
? Histosol
? Histic Epipedon.
? Sulfidic Odor
? Aquic Moisture Regime
? Reducing Conditions
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Concretions 4-8"
? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in
Sandy Soils
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soils are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® YES ? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? ® YES ? NO Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
® YES ? NO
Hydric Soils Present? ® YES ? NO
Remarks:
This data point is located within a wetland.
A
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: High Point Pipeline Relocation River Basin: Cape Fear County: Guilford
Evaluator: Catherine McRae, Suzanne Knudsen DWQ project No:
Nearest Named Stream: Richland Creek Date: 6/07/05
USGS QUAD: High Point East Lat: 35.92651N Lon: 799218'W
Location/Directions: Unnamed Tributary to Richland Creek, southwest of intersection of Checker Road and Joplin Drive.
Stream ID: Stream Crossing 1 (SA-1)
"TLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also. if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used*
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle OneNzimberPertine)
1. Geo>momholoLyv
Absent Weak Moderate StronLy
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture hi Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0
1
2?
3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic) Flood lain 0 1 2 3
6) Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bal* Present 0 1 2 3
10) Is A 2n Order Or Greater Channel (As
Indicated On Topo Map AndlOr hi Field)
Present?
No <D
Yes = 3
NU I E: It tied & bank Caused By Ditching And WI I HUU I Sinuosity I hen Score=Ul)
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 10
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Stroh
1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge 0 1 (D 3
Present?
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
III. Biologv Absent
Weak Moderate Strom
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In. Streambed? 3 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4
SECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Arumber Per Line)
1. Geomomholo6v Absent Weak Moderate Strone
1) Is There a Head Cut? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Is There a Grade Control Present in 0 .5 1.5
Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate a Natural 0 .5 1 0
Drainage Way?
SECONDARY GEOMORPITOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3
IL Hvdrologv
Absent Weak Moderate Strong=
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter Present
1.5
O
5
0
in Streambed?
2) Is Sediment (or) Debris Present on Plants? 0 S 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .S 1 1.5
4) Is Water in Channel and >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (Note: If ditch indicated in No. 9
0
.5
1Q
1.5
above, ski this step and No. 5 below*)
5) Is There Water Present in Channel during 0 5 l 1.5
Dry Conditions or in Growing Season?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in Sides of
Yes = 1.5
No 0
=
Channel or in Head Cut?
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 6
III- niologv
Absent Weak Moderate Strong=
1) Are Fish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .S 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus
Present? O S 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
SAV Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly
OBL FACW FAC FACU UPI,
8) Are Wetland Plants in Streambed? 2 1 .75 .S 0 0
I- NU t C: IJ IOhV AMVICe vJ Ali /'rnn1s In Jtremiwea As IVOIW Avone ship I na,)zep uwLc,5,5 3A V rresenr-i.
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1.25
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = 26.25
(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
Signature: Clldh f??z-s"'
1 INTERAUTTENT CHANNEL
d -
EVALUATION FORM
. form ID SA-1 APPLICANT NAME Piedmont Natural Gas DATE 6/07/05
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) Utility line crossing
1irATERBODY/RIVER BASIN Unnamed tributary to Richland COUNTY/CITY Guilford/High Point
Creek/Cape Fear
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Sunny, dry, warm (871F)
I' SP NP Observation Comments or Description
a Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present
Benthic M acroin vertebrates isopods, scuds
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae and/or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, other) Raccoon tracks in creek bed
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) None identified
® Riffle/Pool Structure
c Stable Streambanks
e Channel Substrate (i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand)
Riparian Canopy Present (SP=/> 50% Closure)
Undercut Banks/lnstream Habitat Structure
Flow in Channel Weak flow
s Wetlands Adjacent to/Contig. With Channel
(Discontinue)
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June thru
September)
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru September)
e Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
s Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Boehnreria cylindrica, Alnus serr•ulata
Important to Domestic Water Supply? Yes
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Yes
Perennial Channel (stop) . Important Channel: 60 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials:
Intermittent Channel proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd) "'4
Evaluators Signature: t r
(if other than C.O.E. project manager
P = Present SP= Strongly Present NP = Not Present 11/4/98
A
NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
Project Name: High Point Pipeline Relocation River Basin: Cape Fear County: Guilford
Evaluator: Catherine McRae, Suzanne Knudsen DWQ project No:
Nearest Named Stream: Richland Creek Date: 6/07/05
USGS QUAD: High Point East Lat: 35.92691N Lon: 79.9233°W
Location/Directions: Unnamed Tributary to Richland Creek, southwest of intersection of Checker Road and Joplin Drive.
Stream ID: Stream Crossing 2 (SA-2)
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used*
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle 0., Numb,, Per Line)
L C.enmornholouv
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 1 O 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? no 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5) Is There An Active Or Relic Flood lain 0 1 2 3
6) Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8 Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present 0 1 =2) 1 3
10) Is A 2° Order Or Greater Channel (As
Indicated On Topo Map And/Or In Field)
Present?
No <D
Yes = 3
NO I L: Ii Bed & Bank Caused by uitcning Ana WI l HUU 1 Sinuosity i nen Score=u-)
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 9
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge 0 1 0 3
Present?
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
IIL Riolo¢v Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4
f 1
SECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomoruhologv Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There a Head Cut? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Is There a Grade Control Present in 0 .5 lO 1.5
Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate a Natural 0 .5 1 1.5
Drainage Way?
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2.5
II. Hvdroloev
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter Present
1.5
1
O
0
in Streambed?
2) Is Sediment (or) Debris Present on Plants? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water in Channel and >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (Note: If ditch indicated in No. 9 0 .5 (D 1.5
above, skip this step and No. 5 below*)
5) Is There Water Present in Channel during 0 5 O 1.5
Dry Conditions or in Growing Season?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in Sides of Yes = 1.5 No - 0
Channel or in Head Cut?
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 5
III. Biologv
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus
Present? O .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
SAV Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly
OBL FACW FAC FACU UPL
8) Are Wetland Plants in Streambed? 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
(* NOTE. If Total Absence Of All Plains In Streambed As Noted Above Skip 77ris Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = 23.5
(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
Signature:

ACTION ID SA-2
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
APPLICANT NAME Piedmont Natural Gas

DATE 6/07/05
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK' (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) Utility line crossing
N\'ATERBODY/RIVER BASIN
Unnamed tributary to Richland COUNTY/CITY Guilford
Creelc/Cape Fear
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Sunny, dry, warm (871F)
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present
a Benthic Macro in vertebrates isopods, scuds, dragonfly larvae
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae and/or Fungus (water quality function) fungus
® Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, other) Raccoon tracks
a Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) None identified
d Riffle/Pool Structure
Stable Streambanks
a Channel Substrate (i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand) cobble
Riparian Canopy Present (SP=/> 50% Closure) Betula nigra
• Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
Flow in Channel weak
Wetlands Adjacent to/Contig. With Channel
(Discontinue)
Persistent PooWSaturated Bottom (June thru
September)
s Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru September)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Betula nigra, Panicum virgatum, Boeluneria cylindrica
Important to Domestic Water Supply? Yes
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Yes
Perennial Channel (stop) a Important Channel: 60 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials:
Inte.rnuttent Channel proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other than C.O.E. project manager
P = Present SP= Strongly Present NP = Not Present 11/4/98
J
NCDN17Q Stream Classification For
Project Name: High Point Pipeline Relocation River Basin: Cape Fear County: Guilford
Evaluator: Catherine McRae, Suzanne Miudsen DWQ project No:
Nearest Named Stream: Richland Creek Date: 6/07/05
USGS QUAD: High Point East Lat: 35.9275°N Lon: 79.92481W
Location/Directions: Unnamed Tributary to Richland Creel:, north of Checker Road and south of Interstate 85.
Stream ID: Stream Crossing 3 (SA-3)
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-
this rating system should not be used*
PRIMARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle one Number Per Line)
1. Geomomholoav
Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture hi Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 O 2 3
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
5 Is There An Active (Or Relic Flood lain 0 1 2 3
6) Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8) Is There A Bankfiill Bench Present? 0 1 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present 0 1 2 3
10) Is A 2" Order Or Greater Channel (As
Indicated On Topo Map AndlOr In Field)
Present?
No 0
Yes = 3
NOT[: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Scores 0*)
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 8
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge 0 1 2 (D
Present?
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3
III. Biologv Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present Iii Streambed? 3 2 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4
SECONDARY FIELD INDICATORS: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I.OeornorUhologv Absent Weak Moderate Stronu,
l) Is There a Head Cut? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Is There a Grade Control Present in 0 1 1.5
Channel?
3) Does Topography Indicate a Natural 0 5
Drainage Way? . 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1.5
IT_ HvdroloprP
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter Present 1.5 (D 5 0
in Streambed?
2) Is Sediment (or) Debris Present on Plants? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
4) Is Water in Channel and >48 Hrs. Since
1Q
1
5
Last Known Rain? (Note: If ditch indicated in No. 9 0 .5 .
above, slci this step and No. 5 below*)
5) Is There Water Present in Channel during 0 .5 Q 1.5
Dry Conditions or in Growing Season?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present in Sides of Yes = 1.5 No = 0
Channel or in Head Cut?
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 6
Ili. Bioloav
Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fish Present? L OD 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Aquatic Turtles Present? .5 1 1.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus
Present?
. 5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
SAV Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly Mostly
OBL FACW FAC FACU UPL
8) Are Wetland Plants in Streambed? 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
(` NOTE: If Total Absence UJAll Plants In Swreambed As Noted Above Snap 11113 Step UNLESS SAV Present-).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2.25
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary) = 24.75
(If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
Signature:
r?
ACTION ID SA-3
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
APPLICANT NAME Piedmont Natural Gas

DATE 3/07/05
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) Utility line crossing
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN Unnamed tributary to Richland
CreeldCape Fear
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS Sunny, dry, warm (87°F)
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present
® Benthic Macroinvertebrates
Amphibians Present/Breeding
• Algae and/or Fungus (water quality function)
• Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, other)
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue) None identified
Riffle/Pool Structure
6 Stable Streambanks
o Channel Substrate (i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand) Coarse sand, gravel
Riparian Canopy Present (SP=/> 50% Closure) Salix nigra, Liquidambar sh raci flua
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
Flow in Channel Very slow flow
Wetlands Adjacent to/Contig. With Channel
(Discontinue)
c Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June thru
Se tember N/A - March sample
o Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru September) N/A - March sample
Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
o Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel Boehmeria c)ylindrica, Salix nigra, Liquidambar
styraci/lua
Important to Domestic Water Supply? Yes
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? No
7; 7
Perennial Channel (stop) s Important Channel: 60 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials:
o Intermittent Channel proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of iinportant/unimpoltant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
L Ur ?l L l t.'•'
(if other than C.O.E. project manager
?::+?P, ,...n.w:i'w: ^, ou J'u.`FeaYCY.w?r' .• _. .?N".iS _.`•. •• ?.+??;:. +s•'..?u?'.i?^-}5Sw".?::a .:FL'tS•.siiti.'YW - I?ieC
COUNTY/CITY Guilford
P = Present SP= Strongly Present NP = Not Present 11/4/98
Protected Species Assessment
A
S&ME
July 22, 2005
Piedmont Natural Gas
P.O. Box 33068
Charlotte, North Carolina 28233
Attention: Herb Jeans, P.E.
Reference: Protected Species Assessment
High Point Pipeline Relocation
Guilford County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
Dear Mr. Jeans:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to submit the results of the Protected Species Assessment
recently performed on a proposed natural gas pipeline relocation project in Guilford County,
N.C. (Exhibit 1). The proposed realignment originates at an existing pipeline approximately 500
linear feet (If) east of the terminus of Joplin Drive, southeast of Interstate 85 in Guilford County,
N.C. and proceeds southwest along the proposed route for the realignment of N.C. Highway 311,
and ends west of the terminus of Windcreek Court (Exhibit 2). This work was performed in
accordance with S&ME Proposal-No. 1357-15204-05, dated May 20, 2005. The opinions - --- -.-
included in this report are based on the information obtained during the study and our
professional experience. This letter summarizes observations made on the dates noted using the
procedures described herein, within the study corridor outlined on Exhibits 2 and 3. Summaries
of the professional experience of the botanist that conducted the scope of services summarized in
this letter report and of S&ME's reviewer have been included as an attachment to this report.
The coordinates at the northern terminus of the study corridor are approximately 35.9324°N,
79.9177°W and the coordinates at the southern terminus are approximately 35.9279°N,
79.9263oW. The study corridor is included on a portion of the High Point East, NC USGS
SWE, Inc. [phone]
9751 Southern Pine Blvd. [phone] fax
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273-5560 www.smeinc.com
Protected Species Review
Proposed High Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
July 22, 2005
topographic map (Exhibit 2). Specif ically, the field review was limited to an approximately 60-
foot wide area encompassing 30 feet on either side of the proposed centerline, as staked in the
field. Included with this letter are a Site Vicinity Map (Exhibit 1), and portions of the applicable
USGS Topographic Map (Exhibit 2). Endangered and threatened species are protected under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1543). Endangered species are defined
as those plants and animals whose prospects of survival are in immediate danger. Threatened
species are those species that may become endangered if conditions related to their existence
continue to deteriorate (e.g., loss of suitable habitat). The purpose of this protected species
review and vegetative communities assessment is to evaluate whether current conditions along
the study corridor are suitable for those protected terrestrial species (plants and animals
occurring on land) whose presence may be currently or historically documented in Guilford
County, to. determine if those species known to occur in the vicinity of the study corridor are
present at the time of field review, and to provide a general description of vegetative
communities identified along the study corridor.
Scope of Services
S&ME's review of potential protected species habitat and vegetative communities in the study
corridor consisted of two tasks. Task 1 entailed a review of existing records obtained from
federal and state sources to identify documented records of protected terrestrial species within
the study corridor. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) webpage was
consulted for a listing of protected terrestrial species documented within Guilford County, N.C.
Task 2 involved a literature and field review of the study corridor to identify areas that may
provide potential habitat for the protected terrestrial species identified during Task 1. Task 2
included a review of topography, soil types, level of disturbance, and plant community types.
Study Methods
Review of the NCNB? webpage for records of protected terrestrial species within Guilford
County, N.C. identified listed terrestrial species and their respective Federal and State status.
2
Protected Species Review
Proposed High Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
. July 22, 2005
The findings of the webpage review are presented in Table 1. Explanations of Federal and State
codes are included at the end of the table. Please note that this assessment did not include a field
review for protected aquatic species.
TABLE 1 I
PltO'l l?(;"I'l:U "I'[+ lt1Il;S1'1ZI ?L SPECIES S )MARY
Species Federal Status State Status
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Bald eagle T-PD E
C = Threatened, E = Endangered, PD = Proposed de-listed
During field reconnaissance, S&ME personnel integrated the information obtained during the
literature review with field evaluation. for the presence of protected terrestrial species or potential
protected species habitat. Portions of the study area that matched descriptions of preferred
habitat for protected terrestrial species listed in Table 1 were classified as potential habitat for
protected terrestrial species. An assessment of potential habitat for protected terrestrial species
in the study corridor was conducted by performing a field review on June 6 and 7, 2005.
Existing Study Area Conditions and Habitat Characterization
S&ME conducted an inventory of existing site conditions and dominant vegetative community
types in the study area. Photographs of the study area are included as an attachment to this
report. Vegetative communities in the study area were distinguished by plant species, location in
the landscape, past disturbances and hydrologic characteristics.
Habitat in the study corridor is limited to open fields, active pasture, areas recovering from
clearing, and narrow riparian corridors. Vegetation observed along the alignment during field
review included soybeans (Glycine max), ragweed (Ambrosia artemesiiflia), sericea lespedeza
(Leppedeza cuneata), fescue (Festuca sp.), blackberry (Rubus sp.), and black cherry (Prunus
3
Protected Species Review
Proposed High Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
July 22, 2005
serotina). Wetland areas along the corridor were primarily vegetated with false nettle
(Boehmeria cylindrica), lurid sedge (Carex lurida), and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum).
Forested wetlands additionally had sweetgum (Liquidambar stryaciflua), box elder (Acer
negundo), and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana).
Protected Flora and Fauna
The NCNHP database identified one federally or state-protected species with a documented
population in Guilford County, as identified in Table 1. A habitat assessment was conducted on
June 6 and 7, 2005 for this species. A description of this species, and typical habitat associated
with it is provided below.
Bald eagle - State Listed Endangered, Federdlly Listed Threatened
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
The bald eagle is associated with coasts, rivers, and lakes, usually nesting near large bodies of
water where it feeds. Nesting habitat in the southeast usually occurs in pine or cypress trees.
The bald eagle is listed as a current record for Guilford County. The proposed project is located
in close proximity to Interstate 85 and is not in the vicinity of large bodies of water or otherwise
appropriate habitat for the bald eagle. Consequently, the proposed project is not anticipated to
impact the bald eagle or its habitat.
Results
No bald eagles were observed during field review. Additionally, the proposed project will not
impact habitat that may be considered suitable for the bald eagle. In summary, a review of
protected terrestrial species known to occur in Guilford County, N.C. identified one bird species.
The study corridor was field-reviewed for the presence of this species. No protected terrestrial
species were observed during field review.
4
Protected Species Review
Proposed High Point Pipeline Relocation
S&ME Project No. 1357-05-386
July 22, 2005
We hope that this letter addresses concerns you may have regarding the potential for impacts to
protected species in the study corridor. Should you have any questions or require additional
information, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Catherine McRae, C.E.
Natural Resources Project Manager
CAM/LJB/cam
Attachments:. Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map
Exhibit 2: USGS Topographic Map
Exhibit 3: Aerial Photograph
Photographs
Relevant Experience of Preparers
Lisa Becks , C.W.B., C.E.
Natural Resources Department Manager
5
x.
lMAA E"?T . , -'_ a
B+ilt hurt Grsndovd Pk it y Imi
68 ' '.. o? pave r.
? ?
?
R Clakdats +,, '`
?a
?
r r ci ett C)t. _.
CedrowDr??c _
y? htontlieu Ave Q '. 29) O I kn on Gras'sraad
`. Moth-or" Htiot$6'
"
"
Copp Branch
r,Llona(d Aye
.High Point ?Lake?d yy r°?
,
M' G7
n n r , ?
IAiI•s ssrasd
n Sho Vilings Rtc
D a o ri
r htan?
y Fruuan MIN

Ava ? v! , .a. ?Baksrlown
Fo+I=t . X f

x
? 29 All«r Jay S2

. R?itttrtplt ? Amhdale , - _._CuHforcl

??_ Randolph
t
? Caltsanss Mitlln

w
Trinity
matt

3 '
31i
62
.

apouest.com, Inc.; 0 2005 GOT, Inc -
Approximate Study Area
Scale: As Shown SITE VICINITY MAP Exhibit

Checked by: LJB PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation

Guilford County, North Carolina 1
Drawn by:
DES ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Date: 6-2-05 Project No.: 1357-05-386

All/
t
Now
Lit il
? .M\ s /?. ? fllr... i
Approximate Study Corridor 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 14i
Source: www.topozone.com, High Point East, 1993.
Scale: As Shown Exhibit
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Checked by: UB PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Drawn by: DES ENGINEERING • TESTING Guilford County, North Carolina 2
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Date: 06-2-05 Project No.: 1357-05-386
k s ??

`?. ? -,t ? • _ ?; ? ?` ? 1,

?
?r
SAS
?'?1,1
?j•

rr dd ? f '?

- Stream Channel
>cale: As Shown
Checked b : LJB
Drawn by: A
Date: ENGINEERING • TESTING
r1R_rli _nq ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
1998 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Guilford County, North Carolina
Exhibit
3
r

NS f4A ? J ..1
Photo 5: Facing north towards Checker Road across
soybean field.
Date: 6/6/05 & 60/05
Taken by: CAM
Checked by: IaJB NGINEERING TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Typical view of vegetation along proposed
View of typical wetland along alignment.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
PNG High Point Pipeline Relocation
Guilford County, North Carolina
No.: 1357-05-386
Photo 1: Facing southeast across pond at northeastern
limits of corridor.
Photo 3: Facing northeast along existing alignment
off Joplin Drive.

Relevant Experience of Personnel Involved in the Protected Species Assessment
Lisa J. Beckstrom, C.W.B., C.E., Natural Resources Department Manager
M.S. Biology - UNC Charlotte; B.S. Biology - UNC Chapel Hill
Project Role - Quality Assurance Review
Ms. Beckstrom is a Certified Wildlife Biologist and Certified Ecologist. She has 11 years of
experience in ecological studies and environmental assessments. Her experience includes
project management; NEPA/SEPA environmental assessments; linear corridor studies;
environmental constraints mapping; wetland determinations and delineations utilizing U.S.
Army Corps of Engineer (USACE) methodology, and stream assessments utilizing USACE
and N.C. Division of Water Quality methodology; wetland and stream permitting; wetland
mitigation; agency coordination; and biological assessments.
Catherine A. McRae, Natural Resources Project Manager
M.S. Biology - UNC Charlotte; B.S. Biology - UNC Chapel Hill
Project Role - Field Review
Ms. McRae has over six years of experience in protected species surveys, ecological studies
and environmental assessment. Her experience includes plant ecology research, protected
species study and management, Natural Heritage inventory surveys, stream assessment,
habitat management, and prairie, stream, and wetland restoration and monitoring; and plant
community identification and assessment. She is additionally proficient in plant keying and
the use of technical plant identification manuals. Her field experience includes
environmental assessments, habitat management, and prairie, stream, and wetland mitigation
and monitoring, including extensive experience in the areas of protected species study and
management, with past work focusing on smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata),
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), and dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis
naniflora).
51 SInc.
Letter of Trans"#" 9 7SWE,
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
2005 704.523.4726
J U L 2 7 Fax: [phone]
Dcrax _,WATER ouAurf Now with 16 Locations
yVE,TLANDSANDSTOFtMWATERBRANCN throughout the Southeast!
TO; Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Firm: N.C. Division of Water Quality
c,,..,,y,A Rale7ph
_ .. Tri{Si?s
XnatriR?. cMarfeee.
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250,'/??f7 `°'';,v„„
Location: Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Catherine McRae
Date: 7122/05 2 O
Piedmont Natural Gas High Point Pipteli0e2
Project: 6
? Relocation
ENGINEERING . TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ? Under a Separate cover via: the Following Items:
? Maps ? Prints ? Plans ? Samples ? Report
® Permit Submittal ? Proposal
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
7 7/22/05 Nationwide Permit No. 12 submittal package

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
® For Your Approval ? For Review and Comment
? For Your Use ? For Bids Due:
? As Requested
Comments: Please find the enclosed a Nationwide Permit No. 12 submittal package for your review. Please
feel free to contact me with questions. 5EspSWully, Catherine McRae CAM
S&ME Project Number: 1357-05-386 Signed:
1>
This Letter of Transmittal and the documents accompanying this Letter of Transmittal
contain information from S&ME, Inc., which is confidential and legally privileged. The
} information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named on this Letter of
Transmittal. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
9M I disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on these documents
is strictly prohibited.
)
Letter of Transmittal

20051426
SWE, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
704.523.4726
Fax: [phone]
U Now with 16 Locations
TO: Ms. Cyndi Karoly JUL 2 6 2005 throughout the Southeast!
DENR . yy
0 STORM4j'7Z4 BRANCH
Firm: N.C. Division of Water Quality C.e..wwm row.
TR{IIw..4
Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250 ?.r?..r:>w '?.',.r?. ,W,M,>a,
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 ?h
ANoMa
a CA.?I..ton
From: Catherine McRae
Savm?aah sDate: 7/25/05
Project: Piedmont Natural Gas High Point Pipeline *aar
Relocation
ENGINEERING • TESTING
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ? Under a Separate cover via: the Following Items:
? Maps ? Prints ? Plans ? Samples ? Report
® Check ? Proposal
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
1 7/22/05 $200 Processing Fee

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
® For Your Approval ? For Review and Comment
? For Your Use ? For Bids Due:
? As Requested
Please find enclosed a check for $200 to cover the processing fee for the application for Water
Comments: Quality Certification for impacts resulting from the proposed relocation of a gas pipeline in High
Point, N.C.. Please feel free to contact me with questions. Respectfully, Catherine McRae
CAM
S&ME Project Number: 1357-05-386 Signed:
This Letter of Transmittal and the documents accompanying this Letter of Transmittal
contain information from S&ME, Inc., which is confidential and legally privileged. The
information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named on this Letter of
Transmittal. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on these documents
is strictly prohibited.
uoijuoTJTjiaO siTTuna 'alum Ov uOTIOaS 103 aa4 uozluozTddv
00'00Z I OVOS/LS£I
? S080038 unoA a03 NIV138 aNV HOV130 3SV31d
VVIOZO
98£-SO-LS£iI SO/ZZ/L
CLZBL oullaoJ 41JON 'a440uo4D
pionalno47 auld wa4tnoS LSL6
Sul '3ms