820465_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

CORRESPONDENCE
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

•f'
II
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
c/o David Nordin
PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral
Farm 2539
Facility No. 82-465
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Nordin,
FAYE`ITEVILLE REGIONAL OF'F'ICE
February 24, 1999
On February 17, an Operation Review was conducted on Farm 2539, facility no.
82-465. This Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is ane of two
visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations during the 1999 calendar year. The
Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was noted that the liner is not properly installed on the new
lagoon on the side closest to the big lagoon. The clay liner underneath the plastic was
severely eroded. You need to contact your technical specialist in regards to the liner not
F
installed. It was also noted that the permit for the new system being tested on
the big lagoon is not addressed under the permit issued for the farm site. Your technical
specialist needs to contact Division of Water Quality in regards to the permit for the new
system.
You are strongly encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist for help.
You may also want to contact your local Soil and' Water Conservation District Office since
they may be able to provide you with additional technical and/or financial assistance to
implement corrective best management practices.
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with
environmental regulations, animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the
State, and the animal waste collection, treat, storage and disposal systems must be
properly sized, maintained and operated under the responsible charge of certified
operator.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciatesyour cooperation with
this Operation Review. Please do not hesitate to call me at 910/486-1541 extension 292
if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information,
icre ,
f�
Scott Faircloth
Environmental Specialist II
cc: DWQ-Fayetteville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files
Sampson County SWCD
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEWLLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301 •5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% P08T-C0NSUMER PAPER
&N

f; andWate` Cor ne,. s<e:rrv: a, :tio, n «; IOpere'tion Reyie! vvj� �• I,@ kit I k i ! 1
,i I .k.. ,kli`<iNkt<',:riffr II�Y.'.[!I ��.I I�I,;� „f II: �I II
P ,I " �(] Dvis�an!`sol
vt Soil and .Water Conservation i 'Com liancel'Ins ectiort I. �r':„ ;i'^'k9
I,. p :��
Divisiairof�Watcr Quality Compliance Inspection�;,� f,�i :k ��i,. ,;IR I�j, !� k�..k;,
- i t �1� 11 r "i ,. t
.Other Agency Operation Review�' , , a k tk t ,ofd' l{ ' r �; .� i�G !a' ' jl r,� ii h �� ±""� ! ` � 1ii��,
�o k k. ,,. l! fH•k:1i
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number 82 465 Date of Inspection 2-17-99
Time of Inspection 14:15 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered JQ Not Opera Date Last Operated: ....
FarmName: 25.359 .................................................................................................................... County: 5.9wP50-U ........................................... ERO .............
OwnerName: ................................................... ............................... Phone No: 910.-2.93:73.43.4 ...........................................................
Facility Contact: 11 ichae.1.Graixain......................................... Title: Employer.................................... ... Phone No: 291-3,43.4-1 ...... I ......
MailingAddress: !t?...l3ct f........................................................................................... 1'.l'.alrsAff..N.0....................... ................................... 2A390..............
Onsite Representative: 1.Yl dwet.Gxalt= .......................................... . Integrator:Cjarr.911'sF9u&T=...............................................
Certified Opera tor:.Cjaylou,S.. ............................ Murphy............................................ Operator Certification Number:18725
Location of Farm:
5�..19.R1..1l�.anaie..fxuxrian�t�rx�tietx.Wlttt.,S.1.7..4.Q�.1..11.xnllsrs.a�xann.a�t.�kit�t.Q.tr S1t.1901�................................................................................
Laiitude • 6 46 Longitude • 6 66
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
LJ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 1000
LJ i is
Ej Boars
f, I "
Design Current Design urrent
Poultry . Capacity Population ' Cattle Capacity;, Populatioq,
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other I I
Total Design Capacity. 1,000 —�
Total SSLW 1,417,000
Number of Lagoons, ❑ Subsurface Drains Present I I[] Lagoon Area I0'Spray Field Area 1 1.
,
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Trap's ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System t.
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
nla
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
® No
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 13ig..fag.Qoja .........Litklc.,l Ags)QIP............................
Freeboard (inches): " ..
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
116199
Continued on back

Facii ty Number: 82-465 Date of Inspection 2-17-99 �1
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ® Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? N Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Anulication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop typeC.oastal.B�rmuda�.(�rxaze.}........... ....................... .............. .i d1. Yj-,gclab1ga..............
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ® Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16, is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Required .Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
No:violations-4r. deficiencies.weire•noted,dtiring'this',visit: •You•iwillfeceive no furthe'r.':
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
® Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
NOTE: Need to contact DWQ in regards to permit for new system being tested on big lagoon. Need to stay off drinking well 100
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
No:violations-4r. deficiencies.weire•noted,dtiring'this',visit: •You•iwillfeceive no furthe'r.':
... ...... correspondence about this visit:. ............ .... .
Comments (refer to question#) Explain a'ny YES answers andlor any recomniendatiorm or any other` colmments'
Use drawings' of facility to;better eiplam situations: (use additional page§ as necessary) , , H' !! `.I
�' ! ! riM1 I}. A , I 1. !j. '.1 ..11!'+all i.�, ti��JR_I♦fl I I ..�.I.fl. ,� Ivleli I !.� r iw.l
According to the database, Start Date 0 1/0 1/89 Certification hate 11/9/98
.►
6- On new lagoon (liner) is not properly installed on side closest to big lagoon. Clay liner underneath plastic severely eroded.
Need to contact technical specialist in reguards to liner not properly installed. No waste going into lagoon. Need to repair
depending on time frame stated by technical specialist.
7- Need to extend discharge pipes into big lagoon that are cut off and broke off as lagoon level is lowered.
9- No marker is present in new lagoon at time of review.
NOTE: Need to contact DWQ in regards to permit for new system being tested on big lagoon. Need to stay off drinking well 100
feet when applying waste in spray field.
Reviewer/Inspector Name tScott ' it
,�:11� 1I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
1/6/99

1\1
116199