820337_Inspection_19990617

�-30-
To: FRO DWQ - Jeffrey Brown
From: FRO DSWC - Trent Allen
Please review the comments section of the attached farm. This
farm needs a follow-up visit by DWQ.

Facility Number 82 337 Date of Inspection 6-17-99
Time of [nspection 15:00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Not O crational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: D.elw.ay..Farm.&..GPRrge..Eakjus.FAtrm............................................. County: $.AWP&Qj3 ........................................... FRO .............
OwnerName: G.ewngg...................................Kakii3s......................................................... Phone No: 53.2-4262 ....................................................................
FacilityContact: owner..................................................................Title:.................................................I.............. Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: 65R.\ urd.Rud................................................................................... Harr.01s.NC ........................................................... 2A444 ..............
Onsite Representative: Ilank.GAy..................
.............................. Integrator:J&YjArw5 ..............................................................
Certified Operator:,]a7C31ea.% ............................... LE9juse.111 ......................................... Operator Certification Number:7,084A .............................
Location of Farm:
.. ............... ...... .................................................................................... ......................................................................................
1,Q.�a.tiaax:...>Frona.i)i;lwa ..sua9l..tur�n.�a&>~.ort.lY1 �o1ia.1,i&ham.amda. a.1.�7..oaile&,.1l�rta<.r' blk.o�n.�lix1.. a3ha. a.to..frat..................
Latitude 34 ' 48 34 i' Longitude 78 • 11 • 09 1,
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer I ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish 46$0 ❑ Non -Layer JEI Non -Dairy
El Farrow to Wean
Lj Farrow to Fee er ❑ Other
Lj Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 4,680
LJ t is
Boars Total SSLW 631,800
Number of Lagoons 12 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Arca
Holding Ponds] Solid 'I 'raps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ®No
b, if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste C,ollection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........................................................................ ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): 13 ....... 2Q ...................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3123199 Continued on back

Facility Number: 82-337 Date of Inspection 6-17-99
6. An -there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type bermuda Small Grain Overseed Fescue (Graze) Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ® Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
Nti yiolatioris'or'deficiencie5-were;n;oted d;ukiing. (his visit: ;You; Will;receive no f irther ; ;
correso otidence about this.visit" ... .. ... ... :.. :. .. .. . .
}. br an 'recommendations or,an othc
Comments.{refer to question #) Explain'any YES Answers an y y r comments �,•
ai
„
Use drawings of.facilit ,to'better:ex lain situations., use additional; a`'e`s asinecessar;' �ti4Gillli�;!,Ei,l,i4 ii.'�I31��� �h'¢§I�;�;+i1''i` "i�'(�p'`�''E'
g Y„ P R ( P g is�i, l
��
„+ .. ,. .. ,. ..�Y) 1 I i ,tl,l{�+l r
����,� ,., �,t_1k�
9- The pumping marker needs to show the stop pump mark as required by the general permit. The stop pump mark for site #1 is
A
46". Site #2 is 49".
4- Freeboard should be at least 19" at all times. Lower the liquid level as soon as possible.
24- A follow-up visit is required to recheck the lagoon level.
�
- �. , ,iF ti !S.°a� ,i u� �,z it, t:.lY ', 51 }�� a f_. Ort d r'N�,+{r:n p •;r � +u i , er... ,�U i
f3
Reviewer/Ins ector Name
P Trent Allen
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

Facility Number: 82-337 Date of Inspection 6-17-49
Odor`[ssues '
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ® Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon'?
❑ Yes
®No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
®No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
®No
i lona ommen s,an or rawings:: , , �._ i 1�, ri Y U il!��� � "� F"�' I t
�JJ i a IlL tilll f•l iYI k .moi E .Fr.
25- Field #12 calls for 12 acres of corn in the waste plan. The corn was not planted this year. This farm only has a 326 lb. deficit.
�
Without the corn planted causes a surplus of nitrogen. The waste plan needs to be revised for a summer annual so the farm will have
a deficit. This farm will be referred to DWQ because of the crop situation and the farm is permitted.
Make sure to put the air quality rules in place. Rules were effective as of 6-1-99.
3123199