780042_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

CORRESPONDENCE
NORTH t�MULI
DWI -to of E wmmwoi ��

DENR-FRO
-�--r�_ OCT 2 l 2011
CCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources �WQ
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
October 24, 2011
Nick Evans
Nick Evans Farm
1158 Page Circle
Fairmont, NC 28340
Subject: Receipt of Lagoon Closure Report Form
Nick Evans Farm
Facility No: 78-42 (deemed permitted)
Dear Nick Evans:
On October 21, 2011, the Aquifer Protection Section received a completed Animal Waste
Storage Pond and ,Lagoon Closure Report Form from your facility. This form indicates that all
lagoons have been closed in accordance with NRCS standards and that no animals will remain
on this farm. There is no permit to rescind since this operation was deemed permitted according
to 15A NCAC 2T .1303.
Please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-3221 if you have any
questions regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
J. R'. Joshi
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
AWS Permit File — AWD780042
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Ralegh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX; 919-715-05881 Customer Service;1-877-623.6748 North Carolina
Internet: tvvrw,ncwaterquality,org �► �}��r,�� l//�
An Equal Opporrunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer N �/ iL

f,
Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
General Information:
Name of Farm: _ iLCL— F '�n'Lx _„ __ Facility No: -
Owner(s) Name: JJt c-k_ tvaA,�r
Mailing Address: 1151 ��-e- _ Phone No: 910-
f-� , A-C-40.,_.k- "Jt_ as B3 H o County: 0Cobnaln­
QUEration. Description(remaining animals only):
Lyplease check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Description:
7j pe of Swine No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
a Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
a Gilts
o Boars
7ype of Poultry No. of Animals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. ofAnimals
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
Other Type of Llvestock:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold?
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes?
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?: O
Type of Dairy No, afAnimals
o Milking
oDry
o Heifers
o Calves
Number of Animals:
Yes
Yes
(Name) (A VJ OLfh v" R of the Water Quality Seotion's st ff i the Division of
Water Quality's ������� Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on � �I (date) for
notification of the pending closur of his pond or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the start
of closure, which began on ! (dale).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North
Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land O er lease Print): N C1L l5vo ss
Signature: Date: ly�%
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Wr cc, I
Affiliation: N014 0vC
Address (Agency): -1`t; V'tst"'•)'I•� Sf, MAll Vq,ti14r, N(- Phone No.: r19'/Ir Ill °
Signature: 11-4kt &A e��= _ Date:
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section
Compliance Group
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
FT (_ 1 AAnrrh 19 )nm

Steve Troxier North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Commissioner and Consumer Services
Division of Sort and Water Conservation
Date: October 10, 2011
Subject: Nick Evans Farm
Robeson County
To: Mitch Miller
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
440A Caton Road
Lumberton, NC 28360-0450
Patricia K. Harris
Director
I have reviewed the final closure condition of the lagoon located at the Nick Evans Farm. All of
the agitated material from the lagoon has been removed using agitators and honey wagons. All efforts
were made to get all of the agitated waste material out of the lagoon in accordance with NRCS standards.
The project -has been completed as detailed in the lagoon closure plan. I am satisfied that the closure
completed on this farm meets NRCS standard 360 and recommend payment for this project.
I hope this letter brings this matter to closure. Thank you very much for your assistance and if you
need further assistance please let me know.
Sincerely,
William Carl Dunn, PE
DSWC Environment Engineer
MAILING ADDRESS
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Telephone: [phone]
Fax Number: 252-975.3716
An Equal Opportunity Employer
LOCATION
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 17, 2000
Juanita Johnson
RR 3 Box 277 or 878 Centerville Church Road
Fairmont NC 28340
Dear Juanita Johnson;
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCE5
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Johnson Farms
Facility Number 78-42
Robeson County
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area Acres Rankina
1 0.92 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds acc:ZIrding to current or alternative standards.
225 Green Street, suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Aitirmative Action Employer 50% recycle&10% post -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
aui Rawls
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

Fdcility "lumber 78 — 42 Lagoon Number Q.......... Lagoon Identifierinao.tiup..lagwa.w.......... I .............
O Active 9 Inactive Latitude F347 F227 27_
Waste Last Added .6.-..-...........................................
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated
Surface Area (acres): 119�........................
Embankment Height (feet): 4................................
Longitude F797 F077 44
By GPS or Map? 1 GP5 [l Map
GPS file number: jf031517a
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet O0 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ® Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet?, *Yes O No
Intervening Stream? O Yes Oi No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): Q < 5 O 5 - 10 O > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? *Yes O No O Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Inspection date 3-15-2000
appearance of OS ludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid a Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty
Freeboard (inches): 12
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
*Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
Q No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
p No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
plication equipment
and/or Sprayfield O Yes
unavailable
comments
fail to make contact O Yes O No
O No O Unknown with representative

O 17ivisian of Water Iuality� x � a' , r , , "
�" a, j'Y:6r :s�i'� �—`Yi� " • ` '
,. r !a Iliyislon of 5a11 and Water Conservation N �� ,�
OOther
r��
s « Hwr
wz
- -, ._ . _ti'a. _�.-
,
-. k_'.+u ,. ,_. r5• ._ ., s-n.a'.,1-...a. i
�. . ., ;r..�.F.:. ,L...,fL.• r`
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint a Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other 0 Denied Access
Facility` Number 78 42
Cj Permitted ® Certified G} Conditionally Certified 17 Registered Date of Visit 3-15-2000
0 Not O erational O Below Threshold Date Lust Operated or Above Threshold: 6.4: 8...........
Farm Name: JohimRJi1,fiarms.............................................................................................. County: RQbrsPa... .,.............. ......................... FRO.
OwnerName. J.tiaxtlxa................................... .lQhmpta..................................................... Phone No: Q110n7.30-MO..... ...,.-_...........................................
FacilityContact: JQWAex..................................................................Title:.,................,............................................ Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Andress: .. �x .T.7.. x. 7..CetxtcryitUe.0 �txG . a tt1.............._ Fai mQW...NC..
20.3.4.Q..............
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator: ............................ --................................... ......
Location of Farm:
41.�Qutfi .altAut.#.nniles.JtxQaa.kit:ixta.�xMta.>toiX.�ast..�?4!ktit�kt�use..k ix..t�pt.. a�tta.�1�,.Z71...�a.�6�. unillrs�. ax�af .a�a.x1�R►t...............
® Swine.❑ Potaltry' ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse j:
,t
Design Current Design Current t� Design_ Current
Swine - „' . Cui aclty PotAilation I'oultry Ca acit Po uli tion =Cattle Ca act Po illation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
1000
0
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
�Npnber ai I.agonns t kC
r
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other'... - .. ;c.;�. .... ' .
Tonal -Design Capaeity. 1,00o
Total SSLW: ; 135,OOi)
Holding fonds /'Solid Trupsr �" M s , s
- ; • •s. ,r ,`� ,Ian _ � ��
W�111
Discharges & Stremn Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes M No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? H/a
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
y ''^'.^'fir; f' y, S Y.— Y "'^, r "`4'i"-T3R,. ,..�yi, •0.�,'n ,� .��y ..�;d- L ^ww. 2!' ,i . __
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,T ent'Allen 1 'r "�", � Scott`Fdircloth h i „ , , ". � 9k.
r.. i ti . #fir a,i �J, h rs u '
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
N
Printed on: 5/12/2000

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 6, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Juanita Johnson
Johnson Farms
RR 3 Box 277 or 878 Centerville Church Road
Fairmont NC 28340
Farm Number: 78 - 42
Dear Juanita Johnson:
A
••
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RECEIVED
Sf.P I2000
FPt'fEITi EVILLE
REG. OFFICE
You are hereby notified that Johnson Farms, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must apply for coverage under
an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty,(60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy. of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter., please call Stephanie Milani at [phone] extension 544 or
Jeffery Brown with the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
r5?:a 4
. tevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Fayetteville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone]OB3 FAX [phone]
An l qual Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
1 !WA
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Or
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December30, 1999 RECENEU
Juanita Johnson ,i y\i 5 2000
Johnson Farms
RR 3 Box 277 or 878 Centerville Church Road FAYETTEVILLE
Fairmont NC 28340 REG. QFFiCE
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 78-42
Robeson County
Dear Juanita Johnson:
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Since
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

0 Division of Soil and Water t6nseirvatlon - Operation Review ' r
Division at Soil and WaterConservatton = Compliance 'Lispectiota }
Division of Water Quality -'Compliance Iiupection
Other Agency -Operation RiVIEW'y...":ice
Routine 0 Complaint © Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DS%VC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of'.Inspection VT G
Time of lnspection 1 124 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Permitted © Certified' ❑ Conditionally Certified i] Registered Not O er, ional a e Last Operated:
Farm Name: uO` ►'�..5... �,�D f!1,+~ Cuunty:'�rd''-.......... ..................
............................... ...,..................................... ......
OwnerName : ................................................... .................................. .......... ............................ Phone No:......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ...... ......................... ................. .............................. Title: ................................ --......................... .,. Phone No . ........... - ......................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..............................,....,................,................................ ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: .. . ................................. I ........... ............................... ................ ......... Integrator:...............,.........................,............................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Locution of Farm-
.................... I .......... • ..............................,.................................... ... .........
..................................................
.........................
..................................... ,................
..
I ......
...........
Latitude a Longitude '
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry i Capacity Po iulation Cattle Capacity Population
[] Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars .';` ; Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present JFM Lagoon Area JCJSprayField Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Disci}arkes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?-_. — - - - - -- -- - ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at, ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance: than -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (II' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure; 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23199
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure, plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do,any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
E::�
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes (3 No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. 'Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. 1s facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? - -
'0•04a,t�itjt's'or- do#iciertcies vt= re l�S�!e'd'0'O* ' ig0*is:vis�t; Yoh iviti 1;eegiye ti fjutrt�t�tr
;cor'respi�ndence.ahotit.this visit. ' .
Comments (refer to question #): -Explain any YES answers and/or any 'reeommeridations or a
Use.dra'wings of facility to better explain situations. (use. additional pagesAes,neccssary) rem /0 mol. We
A i5 Fet
Reviewer/Inspector Name
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No - -
i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
3/23/99

'11- wel". x-. r- - � -- - --a -fk 1'ki y' ...r _
a, r0 Divi - —of Sail and Water Caaservatian U ration ReviewA y, r°�
r I r.•. L R - ,, , --,? 'i5�', 19..E+iH,$ + ,efWt,, I.
S a V' �,r+; vv4+? Division of Soiliand Water'Cdtaservataan JCaamplaanre�l[nspection � t�7 Cp ,4
.!tp!d-1', l!r ,.E�rl I�;
�r o... �, rl f
Q44$�f'n.`'.,.l__ _.h �i�IdhfUlt�Cfa�fif�rt�l.�1dE;�g�°s�,�dIM�'y'�r.�
a of Water it „ Cataa iance.Ins eaktylon rF. y' ,
10 Routine 0 Complaint ]a Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of tnspection 0
Time of Inspection ! cl 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[3 Permitted JWCertified [3 Conditionally Certified ARegistered 1KNot O erational Date Last Operated: .../yf
FarmNasme: ..,... ..4?',"! i,� . ^.---- ................................ County:........,-...................................
Owner Name: ...,,.....�.t.4: >~ti ........,..✓....A.... a !...... �""........... Phone No:.......... ��.. �T....Z.�................................
Facility Contact: .........J.... Ut fr� � - •.............. Title:..............%..........Q...............................-.PPhone-No: _. �`--� ......
/n/ .
Mailing Address:......! a..... *�...a %r ......ce.v4�:V4.Ili.C1,�:,lej......... aiil...7tn ll?,t4 ./U .Z .?`.
OnsiteRepresentative: ......................................................................................................... Integrator:...................,,...,,..,,........................,...............................
Certified Operator:................................•--------"...................------............................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
A
................. I ....... ... w
Latitude =S �� �•� . Longitude �• ��"
r
y; Desi n
�
Current y , Dist ri Current ?
1 �,
. Design CurrelttEE
J5wine �
y y„ ; y r ° r tl
r Sri r f }
Poult t ;, t ' ulattonta Cattle Ca o"n Egg
1Eai +;y„ I,,,. ,,.,F Ca acit
Pn ulation , Y . ; . ,'Ca aci I'o
acat ..Po ulat
?A;.!Wean to Feeder ❑
-' ❑ Layer
q ;r Y
s �k
Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer E'I ❑ Non -Dairy
E
�V-
, � ., • , ,� . c ,1
• s`
'
Fa1.
rrow to Wean
J.,❑other
t
tlr
❑ Farrow to Feeder
.-.,
!I
tl t
�� .F�{�.{1t 1� jS� t 5:�,Erl��i,l ��I +r'ya�QLa1�LfL�e'iSl^�I�hl \.+$i:ut $�`j 1. j I'...
Iltl�
❑ Farrow to Finish
G
y
❑ Gilts.
t�TOtal IS L-W
Boars
k 7tj
�,y�'�', 3
ce Drains nt a giZ Area
��'; ii}'�' �
❑ Spray Field Area
HoldlitilTPotids Soglid Trae'si'
NohLe Liquid Waste Management System
S tem
9 g Y
4
+, E .0
t
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made! ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If dischaarge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, nolil'y DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il` yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3, Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
5tructurc I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ��
Freeboard(inches); ............... I.......... ....,....,..,...................... ............ ................... ,.......................... ..........,.......... ,.............. ,........... ....I.......:......................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: W — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste At}pliV.0tiQ
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive P6nding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
�'A
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) `Mis facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19., Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, Freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?-
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
yi 1p 10j s'or dorlde.ncie i��re ted i t`irjtg th S.VjSjt; • yOt1 ivi1j•tee iye
corresporidei & ab6f this visit
'P;b. E ; ti t � y'
Corn tie66 (refer to questions#) Lxplafn,ariyl
UWdeawings of facility to b'etter explaErcsituat
s -patrrv.,- ,l o lamer- G
��� cz Es �l'e r
�C.lG4dW 1ev,✓.
J
rf o tom. a s
1
Reviewer/Inspector Name
of 5 �e , S 'was
,`ice L
j cL S�ec�' tn� -� T a,�.�- e� 4-o cl eak
Jb� Sam- 5 04CIK n. ct +r
�e • J
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
.,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
3/23/99

r 4
i}r rv�s�an Dof Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review r F +t'
-
�'„ w,< Q'' 1V151on Of.�Ull t3'�I�11�, " h�,a..It,sx il r 'h ' '1hY•�� .. h 4�I�:�', i �t iti� -.- "Othb,r�,I =A_n, pgbc.f. naWc.... ydi",�
ton -m, IndWaterConserva�n�is;,r pF ec�{
ot{ Iio€i¢h ns@x,4§'
y�eC QumfllIn3pelt1UIhDlvlelb
r�0pRv
I�I
MIN
10 Routine Q Complaint Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other �
Facility Number Dale of Inspection
Time or 111spectio11 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted A Certified [3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered [3 Not O er:►tional Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: 5?.1�.,!!'�L?'.`'......rl r ",�........... County:....../�ah.........................................s��.....•.•...............
..................................................
J.Owner Name:.....;"o!iv!'i.......•........• l'bouc Nu.`����...'3�'—✓rGc�....................................
Facility Contact: ....1,-`.4z !rE�.....s1...`"" d?�r.'I'itic:..........'?r�l'T��.�..:................... Phone No:.•.................................................
�% 2 -....
Mailing Address: .......I.......�1 6�....Z..Z..7• •.•..........•....
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:.........
Location of Farm:
.......................................... .............•... .......... ...................... . Integrator: ......................... ............................ .................................
................ .......... •............................................................. Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
...................... ................................:................................................................................................................ ........... ............
Latitude a464 Longitude '° 61
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1E] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons f 10 Subsurface Drains Present IJ❑ Lagoon Area JU Spray Field Area I `
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System ,
Discharges & Stream Impactti
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made??
h. 11'discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. 11' discharge is observed, what is the estimated [low in galhnin?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
SLI•lleture I Structure 2 Structure 3 . Structure 4
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes allo
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: •
freeboard (inches): .•......... .. io ."......... ............................• .....•.•.•....................................
I/6/99 Continued on back

ac lily Number: 7e — qZ, I Date of Inspection
5. Arc there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 wits answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement`?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
ID. Are there any buffers that need nmintenance/iInpro veil] ent?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ I'onding ❑ Nitrogen
❑ Ycs MNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type.....................................................................,.......................................................................................................................,.........,....................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. Does the facility lack wcttable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Ycs ❑ No
Renuired .Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility laic to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil.sample reports)
❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable sethack criteria in eflcet at the time of design?
❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operatur in responsible charge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Rcviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/ittspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same tigcncy?
❑ Yes ❑ No
N.o.vialations vir. de�icieritaes .were no.li;d du.rink.tliis•visit:. Y.oti wiil.rekeilve ncr further. '
e rr spots.... t bout... visiE. ....... • .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recomn iendaiioins or any other, comnienls
Use drawl igstof.facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ;l
t
i ,S 4.a)
Pre GUerG /roe rttoc�5 4 s" of� -�i'.,,c
Y.w 111 __...-IIYYWi
Reviewer/]nspector Name t� aS "'` • ; 1`
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:- Z6 -�� 1116/99

} Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q [] []Other Agency
u j Division of Water Quality
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review � Q Oar
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection
a ; 05 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 13 Certified [3 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted
0 Not O erationat
DaleLast Operated:........,
Farm Name:.................... 7taiGhQt..T.Gi..........�,Okoso 1................................
County:..................../
C?,'?...................................
Owner Name: ..................... 3.�C)!�Llym................Ufa.."tlY!0...............................
Phone No:................
�©~" . + .- .� s ...............
Facility Contact:.............!"h�fot....�.+�ho'1. Title:...........................,....................................
Phone No:......�f�........—.,�r�
Mailing Address:.......... i......... 3...... ✓-ox........ °R../..,1°Ro ................
.......... ........... .............
OnsiteRepresentative: ...........................................................................................................
Integrator:.........................
.�--
Certified Operators- - o •.... ...... �............ p
,,.��....... Operator Certification
Number:....... _.......
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
'Iies�gn Current �` Design Current ;`� Dcslgu Current
Swine' ems.;
. Caipaclty iPopulatian Poultry Capacity Paptylation Cattle Cap' Npulation ,.
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer " ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean` G
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other �a u
❑ Farrow to Finish H, � - Total Design Capacity,
j ❑ Gilts x
BoarsTbtalSL
dung Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
.. .... ... ... T
Number of La eons /Hal
� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System '
�.Rd
u,.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[J�No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
-
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
ill/
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes'
No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design`?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
O No
7/25/97

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures-fL.-kgggtts,k[olding_I'onds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. N storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure i
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ............ .�,55.. ��........
Structure 2
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 3 Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes �(No
❑ Yes ANo
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes kNa
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes j�( No
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? XYes ❑ No
waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes P(No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ}
15. Crop type ... ........ ........... OKM. .;,......v..4.............................. .............. ................................................ ......................................... .......................
..,...
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
4
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Qertifed or Perrnitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0-No.violatiohi-b = deficiencies.we're-ntited•durilig this:visit.- Y. u4ill receive•no.fdrthier•.
. cbrresOddehO about this, visit.•
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ArNo
Yes ❑ No
[XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: `� _ Date: 6� �$°

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producert
Location:
Telephone:
Type operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
JUANITA JOHNSON
RR 3 BOX 277
FAIRMONT NC 28340
Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
1000.00 hogs
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
199B
FAY : i i D;'CIE
_
i `=
REG. 0Fr
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used -
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at less
than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DEM regulations.
Page: 1

AtvtMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN '�C,��V`
;1 0 7 1998
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid d ASP a
downwind odor problems. Rfir:M OFFICE
�cU. C3���CE
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, eto.)
1000 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 1900 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
1000 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 2300 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Paget 2

ABIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
8414
1
NoA
C
110
137.5
9
1237.5
I
MAR-,7UN
8414 11
END
1 16a 112a 1 19 IIFIE18BO-MAR
I
TOTAL12317.5
- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
see required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-_-__-
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
-- indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* Ibs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables.1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
C
W
CORN
WHEAT
BUSHELS
BUSHELS
1.25
2
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1 18 1 2317.5
Page: 4

AjLXAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2 0
TOTAL 1s
*** BALANCE
2317.5
-17.5
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Paget 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 370 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge,
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 1850
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 6.16666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 14.8 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
I I I (Application RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
I Field I
I I
Soil Type
I Crop I (in/hr) 1
I I
8414
1 1 I
I C I 1
NOA
8414 1 1 1 NOA
I W 1
I
*
(inches)
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. in many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the'volume of the waste be stored
in your stracture be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event.of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly inton water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when thes
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina requlations.
Paget 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:JUANITA JOHNSON
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at
the farm office and at the office of the local soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDEM
upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: JUANITA JOHNSON
(Please print)
signature: Q J Date: /Oz]
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
signature:/ �` Date: 6 L
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print) David Hedgpefh-
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. [phone]
Address (Agency): 440 Caton Rd.
Lumberton, NC 23858
signature: Date: d
Page: 11

Page 1
JUANITA JOHNSON
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
DIVISION WATER QUALITY 910 486-1541
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES 910 671-3150
ROBESON SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 910 739-5478
USDA -NATURAL RESOUCRES CONSERVATION SERVICE 910 739-5478
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your
operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You
should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your
property to consider that you have a problem. You should make
every effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan
should be posted in an accessible location for all employees
at the facility. The following are some action items you
should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation,
this may or may not be possible. Suggested responses to
some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow - Possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
C. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field - Actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused
the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields
where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers - Actions
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid, separators
- Actions include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid
separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

JUANITA JOHNSON Page #2
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is
seepage as opposed to flowing leaks - Possible actions:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seeage, put
in a submersible pump and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or
remove animals and fill holes and compact with a
clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the
side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
A. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
B. Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills,
or property damage?
D. Did the spill leave the property?
E. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface
waters?
F. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach
surface waters?
G. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of
the property)?
H. How much reached the surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies,
A. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division
of Water Quality) regional office, 910 486-1541; after
hours, emergency number is [phone]. Your phone
call should include: Your name, facility, phone number,
the details of incident from item #2 above, the exact
location of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions,
the corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
B. If leaves property or enters surface waters, call local
EMS, (Emergency Management Services) 910 671-3150.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.,
D. Contact CES (County Extension Service) 910 671-3276,
Robeson SWCD (Soil & Water Conservation District) 910
739-5478, and USDA-NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation
Service) 910 739-5478 for advice and technical
assistance.
4. If none of the above can be reach call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department 910 671-3100 and explain your problem to them
and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of
problem to minimize off -site damage.
A. Contractor Dame; Goodyear Constructo_n Co., Jimmy Good
B. Contractor Address: RR 1 Sox 372A. Fairmont NC_ 2834,
C. Contract Phone; 910 628-6764

Page #3
JUANITA JOHNSON
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon
(USDA-NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
A. Name: David Hedg2eth, Soil Conservation Technician
B. Addres-s;USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service
C. Phone:[phone]
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ, and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the Waste Management Plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
Other notes:

.-tWw ,.}-K.a •��-�,--�.t.^i� �,;,+�- - - k.Z;;Y'4i:a"+I'u ,� „ '. i�rw"•Ly.:+"��,+,;,; ....,.+.. • .
r
r t ❑ DSWC Anftfiv Feedlot Qpc
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of OW2 inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection a 24 hr. (hh:mm)
tertifled
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status:�stered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:.1,25 for I hr I5 min)) Spent on Review ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel and processing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:.................................. »...................,........,......................................................................................
Farm Name: ..Tenn.hS.an,...Eq.t+.tAl.................... .......................... —.,................... . county:....l�o `o[ 5Q.+`}................................ ..................... .,
Land Owner Name: _ �y:?,? �i_.,................... _........................ Phone No:.. 2"Q......................................
J
Facility Conctact:............... ».... ».... ..»»...... ......._...»».... .._ Title: _............ .._..... ........ ............ Phone No:.. ��Q+�........... ....................
.....
Mailing Address: .... !....-.r.,..,a>�..2�..._,...._...,»,...__... _ ............ ........... ...... ... zfr3.....
r
OnsiteRepresentative:#............................................................€....................• Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ....L�l .:.. ......................» p.`.!^...a..,!Y...................... Operator Certification Num,ber:......,.,................................
Location of Farm:
...£?!x .. ..................... S..... _ :...............� i...........L!:..................:..Q.....,t...........t K... ! ,r.... w.i i........... 4
....,V�'t�, .......................................................................................... I......... �y
Latitude Longitude �• �� �u
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
,;� Design Current 4Desl n Current �z
n. ��� g N: iaes�gn . Current
r Swine apse Po ulatinn poultry #'Ca aci Po'n�at on Cnttle "aci Po iila`ti n.
x0 Wean to Feeder La r Dairy
Feeder to Finish Jn ❑ Non -Layer Fs ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean x . w-
Farrow to Feeder T©talDesignCap�et
Farrow to Finish.,
..I❑ Other
fi H ber of Lagoons /� olding Ponds um
❑Subsurface Drains Present
' ` `�� Lamn Area ❑ S ra Field
Area
,
OR
,' y
�,eneral -
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 4No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field [I Other
\'
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'! (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonstholding ponds) require ElYes No
maintenance/improvement?
vement?
4/30/97
Continued on back

ti '.. .. . , J /.' r
,
Facility Number:.. ..... —...., ..,Zr.
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? -
7, Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures, (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
S..�......... ............................ ..........................
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Aunlication
❑ Yes /4No
[] yes j No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes X No
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes ONO
P Yes ❑ No
0 Yes ❑ No
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes W No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type^.. C:Y, :/....Ga,%.��. F'A.................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?--
20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency:?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspeetor fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For SertitirdTacilities Only
22, Does thc`facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
[] Yes
No
❑ Yes
© No
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ Yes
d,No
Comm°eats (refer to question'#) Explain any. YES a'6kers''and/or any recommendations or any other commet
4 Use. drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary) r a
L iZ Ne Pd ' l 0 (i a f 0 L. r, Cl )Ck
C'
F / 3 IU�S�arT �� � �t+ r�� A,orK(~r
{Mr. N k.)6rkin] 1)r+V;h �tx�� Qt?ll.-bt' err'��-[�,�:'4,.-
r
i'
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l '.
cc: Division of Water Qualit,, jf'ater Quality Section, acilily Assessment Unit
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Date: 9 - Z4 'R
4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Juanita Johnson
Johnson Farms
Rt 3 Box 277
Fairmont NC 28340
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Johnson Farms
Facility ID#: 78-42
Robeson County
Dear Ms. Johnson:
0 17 �T
r
'9� it
vi�7
NOV 1996
ENV. MANAGEMEW
EAyETITTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely, F
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P,O, Box 27687, W 4 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 NvfC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Actlon Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Ms. Juanita Johnson
Route 3, Box,277
Fairmont, NC 28340
Dear Ms. Johnson:
RIP"i F
E)aHNF:Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 25, 1996
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Johnson Farms
Robeson County
On July 19, 1996, an inspection of your animal operation was performed by the Fayetteville
Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance Inspection Report
for your information. It is the opinion of this office that this facility is in compliance with 15A
NCAC 2H, Part.0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact me at (910) 486-
1541 ext. 325.
Sincerely,
Ricky Revels
Environmental Technician IV
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Kay Spear, Robeson County Health Department
Ed Holland, NRCS
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-50Q3 NiC4F C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 91 G-486-1541 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

„,
Facility Number: % S - 4 Z
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date:
Time: I S µ5
GenjeratInformation:
Farm Name: '7o k N s c, s,t F a r- K-& 5 County: Robes 0,./
Owner Name: Phone No: o173 S - S_IV 2 S
On Site Representative: Ken-J, 5"o kmsnra C sonl) . integrator: IVIA
Mailing Address:. _ Lid '--3--'$o;c_Z?7 .
Fa;r-Mdtt!+ AlG 7-534 0
Physical Address/Location:
w / al
t"j-^/
A►-w. O h+ Y' 1 T
Latitude: 1 1 - Longitude: 1 1
Qperation, Descripf=; (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Sow O Layer 0 Dairy
❑ Nursery 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
❑ Feeder
OtherType of Livestock- S Ltli nt Number of Animals: O
Number of Lagoons: i (include in the Drawings and Observations the iroeboard of each lagoon)
Facility I pection:
Lagoon - /
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: /, /�F,E-) Yes L� No ❑
Is seepage observed from the, lagoon?: Yes ❑ No a/
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑ No C�
Is any discharge observed? Yes 0 No Cal”,
Q Man-made Q Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑ No M/
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑ No L�
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Ro-j Crop 5 Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application? Yes ❑ No M1*1
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application? Yes C] No a,",
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No 3'
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No M/
AOI - January 17,1"6

Maintenance
x Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes L No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No [5'
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑ No C9'
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes 3-No ID
Explain any Yes answers: 7L,, s ; ,ssRP-C-4 a" r9-vL-OAC-44 �l{ ar4lw..�.ts _ %.j *-,-t, rdo i--
rL <w�. V\Av: o a d a -+!LA `t,+ ANilitiwlS (no-d Nd`� ba[+�1
rc-54C.`.Yra _i ru atlld,4 :6 f ; \;}d4�� v.tio., r +*-tv6,wc-r---_ A�riw�.ls// arc eas-LIc-d
D �eyo�-�4a-� i � v-�.�; �d �.� ob�� �.► �.�ao�sr. v�d �x� �.c�v.�rc�r.<�v-f- T 6,v �._�.
cc. Facility Assessment Unit
Drawing.- -Observations;
Use Attachments if Needed
t f! 71 Zi. - - n e..ra �d11 nisi.. T.. •.... �tn•'+T•r,X�,-. .+�r. ��
AOI -- January 17,1996

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Ms. Juanita Johnson
Route 3, Box 277
Fairmont, NC 28340
Dear Ms. Johnson:
ED EE H N FZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 25, 1996
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Johnson Farms
Robeson County
On July 19, 1996, an inspection of your animal operation was performed by the Fayetteville
Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance Inspection Report
for your information. It is the opinion of this office that this facility is in compliance with 15A
NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact me at (910) 486-
1541 ext. 325..
Sincerely,
Ricky Revels
Environmental Technician IV
` ` r
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Kay Spear, Robeson County Health Department
Ed Holland, NRCS
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville N%PC
FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Actlon Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number: %y - SLZ
r Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations SitepVisitation Record
'�'�w�[r;• :Wr �..b,'i .l. :f�:5. Dift:•�/1�'7�0..
-.mr Ain F-� h,.. /�T� •'a.sw�r. y 1'.a
Time:
seral•`Informatioe• �
r
a
Faun Name: '
7 okN so r.t F-a�-yAs County: Ro'6e.so,%l
—0wner.Nai'ne:= 'I; tau U4'
On.Site=Representative i
.�,a 3�MailinvrAririrPcc•r�.Ay!�Q.,.:�.'`..�
'C.`"wr•so,�..r---'-�•�-`�-�.�_�`�•'��.:...._....._'w� `Phone No• 0 738 - 5�2 8
„gyp{�'"`..�. t+��w+iyih�:.�s., ._...s�Gi.�hWteiJ �-�`r�•.Grx�Z:.�3'�C''�•" --• ""......,. ." .'..
_...Physical'Addr6s/i;ocado"0 - '�W4 "�So.r'Kt;� Q�a`Oiit g�/w/GS Rlcrnk; farYN�an�CA
_... . - - -_•._ 1,t f DaSf....k/k:ft'hoks �-- F`rt_" Ayo �': OriJ�b . 5�..�z.i'1 `�M a o_..O-• At-
-Operation c ' • (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Sow ❑ Layer O Dairy
* Nursery ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Feeder
OtherType of Livestock S Wi Al Number of Animals. O
Number of Lagoons: f (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Faciljy Inspection:
Lagoon
Is Iagoon(s) freeboard less than 1•foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Is seepage observed from the, lagoon?:
Is erosion observed?. -
Is any discharge observed?
❑ Man-made 0 Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
(List the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Row C=g 5 Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 240 feet of waste application?
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
AOI -- January 17,1996
Yes S No ❑
Yes ❑ No 3/
Yes ❑ No a/
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No M9
Yes ❑ No 3/
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ [No C�
Yes ❑ No [9�
Yes ❑ No 3/

1
- Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? '
Yes CY No 0
:,= Is there evidence of past discharge from any. part• of -the operation?
Yes ❑ No C r
Does record keeping need improvement? .��;_ A�... ; 'a
Yes O No
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site?,, • - .--Yes
•°,,No ❑
tA!] e:
plain any,Yet answers 'T�� s i Nspe_G� ar., ar�.r�alc d - ••6i..a.{ a►.►`ti�_;...+[y
.,.� �-'r.�ot-
._.�� �s�+. � �nn�.K�s,c.Nsow-.;�,a;c.��-t4..�.f .o.�►�,r...a.ts c,,.¢d...,�04.,.�b;�.�,~,
t I 1 't��+�
` Le ��i^..4.'LLYC.rC?0�11
J.AS d t „r `iW T0.�--ti o.� tr •.1rv�0.Z fy+4LfJ �hiL-C�. 'l1 Ni W►w
4f �d
y�
4-d w I i aXFsI.'
JifoJv- e%audL" j
_
Oaw �ir��
`D
RCM! --4 : S - 9-r a �..i '�v �7.11� ! d ell �r AggoCyc.Jw►�s,� w l.wtj� uwwe.u�-s
/ay - 6.. _
.. ..D _ _
�31 ..`I
i�.e..:�..b cam% 1 .... • �
i1..1'• , j • � �i 'I i .,)..1. .�� M.....�t � �Z :•.•...,.,...,... _. �....�L..».."•........� --�-- . ............ .... . .-.-.- .....ate .- �.. w .. -.
...._/zq/
_".Signature:_ _-- . Date:
q (e
cc. Facility Assessment Unit Y �i� f" ' ... Use i4ltaciunenrs if Needed .
_ _
or Qbseaations:
0
' 411 Y, 1'i r•^ �. +1-,' !T !n tiRl ���' /�I ref .•r �.r�.'h/�r'ei-r!k••�r —. '
AOI -- January 17,1996

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 25, 1996
v,- ,4—) NC, zs6 3 4-c�
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
nZ+MSu` �0.Vw..�S
Dear GIs . �ai.Ns.�•-L
1°l A9 w
On�;''','an inspection of your animal operation was performed b the
Fayetteville' Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy o¥ our
Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this
office that this facility is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and
that Animal Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should ou have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
`f 5
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
A4: 14 , SQ�ar
�d H14a S

i
` State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources T40 • e4A
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor ^ c
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary L.! C
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
December 7, 1995
Ms. Juanita Johnson
Rt. 2, Box 63C
Fairmont, NC
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Robeson County
Dear Ms. Johnson:
On October 25, 1995, an inspection of your animal operation was performed by the
Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance
Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this office that this facility is
in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being
properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact me at (910)
486-1541.
Sincerely,
Ricky Revels
Environmental Technician IV
RR/bs
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Wachovia Building, Sulte 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
F KU

Site Requires Immediate Attention: Nk
Facility No. 79- 4 Z
DNISION OF F 4MONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
AND&AL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE ViSITA71ON RECORD
DATE: r0 - ZS , 1995
Time: /6 So
Farm Name/Owner: S-oh M so w i= OW Kn, % J v.m N 'A o,-, _ 3e \k M s o N
Mailing Address: Rout e- Z $a X' & 3 C NC --
County b _sent
Integrator: S* 5 C C 4acl bourN J N C.) Phone:
On Site Representative: Ke; ik ;�e +\ u So_a „ , Phone: t 9j Q) 7 3 S - s4AZ 8
Physical Address/lA=tion: sou4_ -Fie= Fart-wom i , �ur.v /e�'7 aosf
iVii �touSe rc �0 5R-Z_ 7-7 .(v iy•'Ic� t-`ar►r e.v ri /� ,
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 2-000 sue; h,cr Number of Animals on Site: 1050
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
latitude: • ' " Longitude• ° '
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) ©or No Actual Freeboard: 2 Ft, o Inches
Was any seepage observed from the la oon(s)? Yes orb Was any erosion observed? Yes or(
Is adequate land available for spray? Qg!g or No Is the cover crop adequate? (yjo or No
Crop(s) being utilized: tViA,4e-, R4 e a&,d iPaw Crog s
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Felt from Dwellin s? es r No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes orb
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or®
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or® If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes ore&
Additional Comments: 7W. h-f'�<<I*,4, ,,, ..5-� oeA;,. aN o0o�arave-d wrsiv- u-f;
J
R,c.I� e.'_!s
Inspector N
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
February 28, 1991
Mr. Kenneth Johnson, Owner
Route 3, Box 277
Fairmont, NC 28340
SUBJECT: Complaint Investigation of Designated
concentrated Animal Feeding Operation
Johnson Swine Operation (SR-2277)
Marietta, North Carolina
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Johnson:
on Monday, February 11, 1991, Mr. Ken Averitte, and Mr. Ricky Revels,
Environmental Technicians, Fayetteville Regional Office, conducted an
investigation in response to a complaint that was reported to this office by
Mr. Hugh Cole, Robeson County Health Department. our investigation revealed
that the Johnson Swine Operation had been land applying wastewater from the
wastewater holding lagoon. It was determined as a result of this
investigation that wastewater had ponded on a small area of the field adjacent
to the wastewater lagoon. The ponded wastewater does pose the potential for
water quality violations if the wastewater were to drain into an adjacent
surface water drainage ditch.
It should be pointed out that your facility was designated as a
concentrated animal feeding operation on September 5, 1987 and any discharge
of wastewater from your waste handling system into surface waters will be
considered a violation of N.C. General Statutes 143-215. Provisions are made
in this statute for assessment of civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day per
discharge.into the State's surface waters.
Since it appeared that your operation had on hand the necessary spray
irrigation equipment, there is no question that you have the capability to
properly dispose of the wastewater by land application. It is recommended
that a freeboard level of at least 2 feet be maintained in the waste
stabilization lagoons at all times. In addition 'care should be taken with
regard to land applying wastewater in areas where wastewater runoff may reach
surface waters.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714 • Fayetteville, N.C, Z8301-5043 • Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Kenneth Johnson
Page 2
Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated and please feel free to
contact Mr. Ricky Revels of this office at [phone], should you have
questions regarding this matter.
fc
14,
P.E!'_
egional S pef'v sot
MJN/RR/gc
cc: Robeson County Agriculture Extension Service
Hugh Cole - Robeson County Health Department

10
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 17, 1987
[WVN.A4941I;Nt�0PRIM; I
TO: Page Benton, Deputy Director
Division of Environmental Management
THRU: George Everett
Water Quality Section Chief
FROM: M. J. Noland, Regional Supervis }N J. N<)LAND
Fayetteville Regional Office
SUBJECT: Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation
Kenneth Johnson Swine Farm
Marietta, North Carolina
Robeson County
On Wednesday, August 5, 1987, Mr. Ricky Revels, Environmental
Technician, Fayetteville Regional Office, conducted an investigation in
response to a complaint that was reported to Mr. Hugh Cole, Robeson
County Health Department, from a road crew of the Department of
Transportation. Our investigation revealed that the Johnson Swine
operation had a discharge through a manmade conveyance from a waste
handling lagoon located adjacent to the hog farm. The farm is a farrow
to finish swine operation. There are approximately 700 swine over 55
pounds (less than 300 animal units) and approximately 200-300 swine less
than 55.pounds. All three housing units discharge into a wastewater
lagoon less than approximately 0.25 (surface) acre, which is connected
via pipe through a ditch to an unnamed tributary crossing State Road
2278 that flows into Alligator Swamp, Class "C" swamp. During this
inspection the lagoon level was such that the waste was not leaving the
lagoon;.however, there was evidence that swine waste had recently been
discharged. Samples were collected from a small ponded area on the down
stream side of -State Road 2278 right-of-way, which revealed Fecal
Coliform of 14,000/100 mi. It should be noted that the unnamed
tributary had a no -flow condition at.the time of this sampling
inspection investigation.
During the course of the inspection, determinations were made in
accordance with N.C. Administrative Code 2H.0123(a)(3) for a
Concentrated Animal Feeding operation not falling within'the definition
provided in the 40 CFR 122.12(b)(3). The investigation did reveal the
following:
1. It was determined that a pollutant discharge(s) does occur to
the surface waters of the State through a manmade conveyance.

Memo to Page Benton
Page 2
August 17, 1987
2. The -discharge does occur to the State's surface waters
(Alligator Swamp "C Swamp", LRB) from the subject hog farm. The
discharge does occur as the result of improper waste management
practices and is not the result of a 25 year, 24 hour rainfall
event.
In accordance with field evaluation and the "Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operation Regulation," the owner should be given notice in
accordance with Subchapter 2H, Section .0123(b).
It is recommended that the attached letter to Kenneth Johnson Swine
Farm be sent notifying this swine operation that a permit application
needs to be submitted or the discharge eliminated within 60 days in
accordance with the North Carolina Administrative Code and Code of
Federal Regulations.
RR/fc
Attachments

.
"f1y,Ni
K,te•1� frk `?'Ala.. x
l'I'�1,
ri ,±- • �.r.y �ff �
r"L•:�"� .�. ",at 3.; '�„'+fY +� -4 �z �'9 '��tt�,,��-ttt ���•� !f.��r';��^'.$
r. QF` 1{%'ry ��9.r nYf � �riz�r,•,t ''t �.•6�'��.'!� ~'y�Ri�'r'7 �! vi'.b.:v y�», ye
'— 9•. _i r.': ...
t ;Aye �'j 73 ,rawer•.}�•� �` � _ }j
r tNs�yi!dS�i"_+.rii:y�+e4� yytvy C �':krG ui=�A�►4k'�z1it
+y„, y • + r ,• 1*' I � ��•1I L.. • i- r 14 � M ,.� z.,�.�s�L•r' J "'•. , •V j
Yi sill
..�.- ,n"'� r� } � � ° � yy d(z . �i•... 7 �4• 4'�.:;,t'i'%�... �7' fy� 1{"�� �' �! �
'i,'J" �� L Yr'�!' r �,a �"t �f!`.� � -t r 1' .'z ••,+, .:�• .4��u�I`r -M-. � it rid .1 j �•�
��pp .r v �,* ; t �� z• � ': y�' r,.y ''.p+'^ .13,.tiy.� rt 1 :. ,..n: . iYa ` t
•rbd `� � Y,,L.d, Z.sL �A� C••y, _ai� M . , ••r4�� 1++T"rr"�• rl� - ;,,i..",.�r�.,�clyF .�'r,^•-•;��y.�•�i
,.��.. •.>, }r�.ea +�.,,� �++ y+^ r .ry , � ,! •. 1_, � ,�, �y �a.,r• h y�'r�' �� Y Y '�f��•.r �'`� ..: � �.1,rjtSf
_� r. '�: ,A: !-1,:+%' '�'.,' rr �.- �� fylygaS- `a .r�� '•ice•. 3 r� }pr Y .k�, i�}
• r I y11yg ,` �'1 Y^�IA. � r 1^ra�. +'may ���ti�iaFg.,t, r2 ���� �;�',,.'� �z��'J,.'t!rw^h���ti�
J f `� -+ � T� ff � z ,'� �f �r� :�`a� .iA Lr�ky'�,b--�5 -.q, � 1y +y,h ,���+• 1�. ,,c4, .v+P'�Sw"ytR `�
�I y lug` . .• � � ,
--- +SDI'. �:rf f �,` 11"� x �.r�•_ , „r� ;^�+,.,�r:��•
I .rY• ,, 4
� � f .. .--�, •u: � 41 ,j7s++: f �4��p��r ..,', i xl f, �r��a�,
• p•�r 111��'� r � �I i '� ' � I � tf •� �.
zit' ; � I E• : , z 11 � ` � � ��_t�i " , '!
zYr, .. -,rtri.• s . MmI
04' • I �'

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Kenneth Johnson, Owner
Route 3, Box 277
Fairmont, North Carolina 28340
SUBJECT: Designation of Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operation
Johnson Swine Operation (SR 2277)
Marietta, North Carolina
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Johnson:
This letter is to notify you that the Johnson Swine Farm located on
State Road 2277, which is a farrow to finish operation, is hereby
designated a concentrated animal feeding operation in accordance with
Title 15, North Carolina Administrative Code 2H.0123(a)(3), and adopted
Federal Regulations 40 CFR 122.23. The designation of your swine farm
was based on a site inspection conducted on Wednesday, August 5, 1987 by
members of the staff of the Fayetteville Regional Office. This
inspection showed that you had established a concentrated animal feeding
operation requiring such designation based upon the following facts:
1. It was determined that a pollutant discharge does occur from
subject operation through a man-made device, which eventually flows
into Alligator Swamp, Class "C" Swamp, surface waters of the State.
2. The subject operation houses less than 300 animal units (700
swine greater than 55 lbs. and 200-300 swine less than 55 lbs. at
all times).
3. .The,discharge does occur.as a result of improper waste
management practices and is not the 'result of a 25 year, 24 hour
rainfall event.
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is
required for discharges of waste to the surface waters of the State.
:However, if you can permanently eliminate the discharge by implementing
l

Mr. Johnson
Page 2
changes within sixty (60) days of your receipt of this Notice,
including, but not limited to, modifications to lagoons and the
implementation of a final waste disposal plan, a permit appplication
will not be required. If compliance has been achieved, you must notify
us in writing within sixty (60) days describing, in detail, the changes
or modifications you made.
If the discharge of waste to the surface waters of the State is not
permanently eliminated within sixty (60) days of receipt of this Notice,
a NPDES permit application must be submitted within that time.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate, to the
Director, Division of Environmental Management, P. 0. Box 27687,
Raleigh, NC 27611. Assistance, if desired, can be obtained by
contacting Mr. Tommy Stevens Regional Water QualitL Su ervisor, Suite
714, Wachovia Building, Fayetteville,'_NC 28301,_ phone 919 _486-1541.
The applications should be accompanied by construction plans for the
nondischarging animal waste management system.
For your information, the following items are enclosed:
1. One copy of the Federal Register - Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations, 40 CFR 122.23.
2. Three copies of NPDES Discharge Permit Application - Short
Form B.
If you need advice or technical assistance with regard to managing
animal waste, you should contact your county extension chairman or North
Carolina State University's Department of Biological and Agricultural
Engineering at [phone].
If you wish to contest this Designation, you must request an
administrative hearing within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this
Notice. This -request must be in the form of a written -petition,
conforming to Chapter.150B of the North -Carolina General Statutes, and
filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post .Office Drawer
11666, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. A copy of the Petition should be
filed with this office.
If you do.not request an administrative hearing, this Designation
will become final in thirty (30) days.

Mr. Johnson
Page 3
A copy of this letter is being sent to agricultural agency
representatives for information and to aid them in providing cooperative
assistance. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please
do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
R. Paul Wilms
RR/fc
Enclosures
cc: Mr. M. J. Noland, Fayetteville Regional Supervisor
Mr. Edward L. Holland, District Conservationist, SCS
Mr. John Richardson, Extension Agent

h�
I ci�
Division of Environmental HansSment
CHAIZI Ol CUSTODY RECORD
For Investigation of tlam
Samples collected mad DHl forms completed by:
b 061 Station.
Lab'No• Mo. Station Location Date Tice
No. of
Battles
a7 �Y0.iN4 c t—\; 1, Sf, 2Z72 /i�urit�/Io. IV, C, 05--137 /2-00

• r ,
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT V R QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM 1
COUNTY NAtSorj
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
K
j
,`
RIVER BASIN L ' F_ IN E.E
[:]AMBIENT
STREAM
EFFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO O RO RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS
QA
AT SM
❑COMPLIANCE ® CHAIN
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
Other
OF CUSTODY
EMERGENCY
❑ ESTUARY
Shipped by Bu Courier. tali, Other
Fnr I IT.. nNf V
Lab Number. /0
! -/// �[
r /
Date Received: /
�
7Tim -fete
Rec'd _ by: From: Bus -Courier -Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY :
C_K:
DATE REPORTED: i Sc
1 -
.
COLLECTOR(S): o -le f S n t /� �y
Estimated ROD Range: 0-5l5-25 5�►5 0 130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: E J Ira NQ c 4C f o A 5k 22 7 fS ipr i C � Jy C .
Seed: Yes ❑ No© Chlorinated: Yes No IX REMARKS: f / i n/ifQS i�.Ai�a,r n T KrA,AI PA •� (loyS..I Aic AcApp r,l ow/ 4>< 5R- ZZ77
Station
Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) I Time Begin I Date End ITIme End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type
o$ 1 /155 1167 b$I65'/2-) • A H L
1 Y/ BOD5 310 - `a >_ a mg/IA
2 Jl COD High 340 k mg/iT'
V
3 COD Low 335 mg/l
Y Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /11 _ - /100
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /IDomI
Coliform: Fecal Strop 31673 /loom]
Residue: Total 500 mg/l
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/]
12
Volatile 535 mg/]
13
Fixed 540 mg/]
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/l
16
Acidity to pH 8-3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to PH 9.3 415 mall
16
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
191
TOC 68D mall
20
1 1
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 USA
Phevpbytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Coior:IPH ) 83 ADMI
Color. PH 7A 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 `d mg/1
Fluoride 951 mS/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mall
Grease and Gila 556 mall
Hardness Total900 mall
Specific Con�d,..+95 V�uMhos/cm2
MBAS 3r8260^�� malt
PhenolsLs2:$0�� +��'' ugA
Sulfate 9 ;4
V%� mall
�
Sulfide 74SA % t5i
TIrA
NH3 as N 610 mgA
TKN as N 625 mall
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mall
PO4 as P 70507 mall
R Dissolved as P 666 mgA
.Cd-Cadmium 1027 ag/l
CrChromium:TotalI034 u9/1
€ wCopper 1042 son
N,-Nickel 1067 USA
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/1
Zu-Zinc 1092 ugA
Ag-Silver 1077 ugA
Af-Aluminum 110S USA
Be-"Illum 1012 ag/)
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/1
Co -Cobalt 1037 no/1
Fe -Iron 104S ug/l
Composite
T S B
Sample Type
C G GNXX
Li -Lithium 1132 ., uSA
Mg -Magnesium 927 mSA
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
Na-Sodium 929 mg/1
Arsenl=Total 1002 ugA
Se -Selenium 1147 ugA
Hg-Mercury 71900 USA
Organochlorine Pesticides
OrgmophoqhXuS Pesticides
Add Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeabte Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytopianktan
Sampling Point
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperamm C
D.O. mgA
pHt�
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature a
PH 83 PH 4.5
PH 4-5 PH 8-3
2
94
10
300 s
400 a
82244 1431
82243 192242
20
Salinity B
Precipition Wday)
Cloud Cover X
Wind Direction magi
Stream Flom Severlty
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft
480 ­
145
32 . r-
36
11351 _
1350
35
64
4
f>U/11 - On Il
lo/86

Date Received s gag Z $ � � $ 7 (7 u-- scf e y
Compla<inant I a Mama:
Address & Phone No.s
Type of Complaints
Location of Complaint CAtmty s Z ?
__ -Z
Narratives 1 r Ey. -_l p ..�..��1.�,d Y..�..X` i 1 a
D,%rioy• c_�.atirc�_
y ON sR-2Z-77 I `
ml 2 7 7 }-j r`rna°n✓
Date Investigators 1 7
Investigators
Swiples Taken Yes v No
Narrative of Investigators Actions 6 Recomendations: S
_ �I.�
`F o n+. r3 S-a Z Z -I Lu C r C-rr W 0 SAC Wr Y
kSa ,SAS-S M- L -Z-)U6w'seiN?`..i:4 s MPC�-t- o-W4--f—
b-C _ o QS1S t S ) Yeay 5 /r .
r�h
Other Sections XuI mlved s

r
AGRICULTURAL
EXTENSION North Carolina State University
SERVICE School of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Address reply to:
County Eztewdon Office R ti
P.O. Box 2280
Lumberton, N.C. 28359-2280 NOV 2 f98T
October 30, 1987 ENV MANAGEMENT
Mr. Tommy Stevens, FAYETTEVILLE REG. oFF C.,
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Suite 714, Wachovia Building
Fayetteville, N. C. 28301
Subject: Elimination of Waste Discharge
Kenneth Johnson Swine Operation
Marietta, North Carolina
Robeson County (SR 2277)
Dear Mr. Stevens;
This letter is to inform you that Mr. Kenneth Johnson, owner
of a farrow to finish swine operation located on State Road 2277,
did receive a Letter of Designation dated September 2, 1987. In
response to that Notice, Mr. Johnson seeks to achieve compliance
within the specified time period. Application for a NPDES permit
will not be necessary, pending approval of his actions.
Mr. Johnson requested and received cooperative assistance
from both the Robeson County Soil Conservation Service and the
Robeson County Agricultural Extension Service in evaluating waste
management alternatives, modifying waste management structures,
and formulating a final waste disposal plan. These actions,
documented by the enclosed supporting materials, are described in
detail herein.
SITE INSPECTION:
An initial site inspection conducted August 24, 1987 by Mr.
Johnson and representatives of the afforementioned agencies
indicated that:
1. The original lagoon was improperly designed, presenting
a structural threat to adjacent buildings and collecting
an unnecessary volume of rainfall.
2. Modification to that lagoon was necessary to eliminate
such problems and insure continued compliance.
3. Acreage adjacent to the operation will facilitate final
disposal of all waste generated, making prudent use of
its nutritive value.
Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture and Home Economics A&T and N.C. State Universities,100 Counties and U.S. Department of Agriculture

Mr. Stevens
Page 2
MODIFICATION TO LAGOON:
Figure 1 serves to illustrate modification to the original
lagoon, which was discharging pollutant at its southeast corner.
Such modification was supervised by the Robeson County Soil
Conservation Service:
1. Sequential increases in lagoon volume generated spoil
that was transferred to the westernmost portion of the
original basin, creating a 50-foot buffer alongside
Buildings "B" and "C". This buffer reinstates structural
integrity to these buildings and diverts rainfall shed
from them away from the lagoon,
2'. Further'excavation repositioned the lagoon northeastward,
increased its dimensions and volume, and created a.
surface water diversion terrace around its perimeter.
3. Buildings were fitted with_10-inch'PVC drain pipes that
permit gravity flow of waste into the lagoon for
treatment.
4. A storm sewer was cut to divert surface water around the
north and east ends of the lagoon while excluding animal
waste.
Sizing criteria (refer to Design Data) emphasize maJor
operational needs to control odor and prevent sludge buildup
during waste treatment:
Outside Length: 305 ft.
Average Outside Width: 100 ft.
Depth: 10 ft.
Sideslope: 1:1
Total Water Volume: 265,833 cu. ft.
The volume of this lagoon exceeds that required for holding
and treating waste generated by 820 animal units, plus additional
minimum for excess rainfall and 25 year, 24 hour storm by 75 per
cent. More importantly, the clay subsoil comprising the lagoon's
bottom and sides should effectively seal, completelyeliminatinA
discharge of waste into Alligator Swamv. Class "C" Swami). surface
waters of the State.

Mr. Stevens
Page 3
FINAL WASTE DISPOSAL:
Based on swine anaerobic lagoon characteristics determined
by the North Carolina State University Department of Biological.
and Agricultural Engineering, lagoon liquid will accumulate at a
maximum rate of 4312 gallons per day. Total liquid volume
provided by the modified lagoon of 1,993,747 gallons will permit
accumulation at this rate for 462 days (15 months). At that
point, lagoon liquid will have reached the maximum wastewater
storage level, and must be pumped down to prevent overflow,
Recent purchase of a 1100 gallon spreader tank may
facilitate a portion of final disposal. However, disposal via
this method alone will require hauling between 248 and 1430 loads
per year, depending upon rate of waste accumulation, Therefore,
land application via irrigation is implicated.
Lagoon liquid characteristics and recommended land.•,
application rates. based on nitrogen fertilization indicate the
following options for final waste disposal:
Crop Alternative
Acreage
Required
1. Corn
12
- 34
Acres
2. Fescue
6
- 17
Acres
3. Hybrid Bermudagrass
4
- 11
Acres
The diversity of Mr. Johnson's farming and livestock operations
and the acreage bordering the unit justify any one of these
options or combinations thereof.
The Agricultural Extension Service' has outlined the
following series of actions to be taken in planning for final
waste disposal and maintaining permanent compliance:
1. The Agricultural Extension Service will accompany Owner
to swine operations following recommended procedures
for land application of waste via solid -set and
travelling gun irrigation systems.
2. Owner will determine irrigation system desired, crop Cs?
involved, and acreage committed to land application of
waste based on information supplied to him by the
Agricultural Extension Service, the Soil Conservation
Service, and the Department of Biological and
Agricultural Engineering.

Mr. Stevens
Page 4
3. A representative of the Agricultural Extension Service'
will monitor wastewater level of the modified lagoon on a
continuing basis and advise Owner on time restraints
involved in installing the selected system prior to
required pumping,
4. When design treatment volume has been achieved, a sample
of the lagoon liquid will be submitted to the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture Plant Analysis Lab in
Raleigh for analysis. Test results will be used to.
determine appropiate application rate (s) for crop (s)
under irrigation..
5. Wastewater will be submitted for analysis once yearly
with application rates adjusted accordingly.
Should you have any questions regarding the corrective
actions taken thusfar, or the proposed plan of action for final
waste disposal, please d❑ not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Gre ory B. Traywick,
Asst. Agr. Extension Agent
N.C. Agricultural Extension Service
/&44
._
K. L . Graham,
Soil Conservation Technician
U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service
Enclosures.

(� TO.US 41) STATE ROAD 2277 (TO MARIETTA )
FIGURE 1#
LEGEND:
BLDG. A - Curtain sided finishing
floor, 30' x 225'
BLDG. B - Farrowing house, 16-stall,
25' x 120'
BLDG. C - Modified open front finishing
building, 30' x 75'
------ - Original lagoon, Approximately
50' x 100' x 10,
- Modified lagoon, waterline
dimensions 100' x 305' x 10'
- 10-inch PVC Drain Pipes
— - — - Drainage Canal
Site of Previous Discharge
N
W
E
S
NI
i
r
•1 r
C i
1 �
BLDG. B
i *
BLDG. A
�
-1
r
•s -

DESIGN CRITERIA
ANAEROBIC SWINE LAGOON
Name Date Z"
Addrers / Phone.�
Location
DESIGN DATA:
sows x
� x
____ Pigs x
lbs. -
1 be, -
�D
lbs.
Total Weight =
Total Weight __. .zoQ lbs.
W
100
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS:
(1) VOLUME FOR WASTE TREATMENT:
lbs.
lbs..
1 be.
lbs.
a. U •
Total Weight _!dE'�� lbs.--��._D�2� __- ft. 3
(2) VOLUME FOR WASTE GENERATED:
a. U. x 8. 4 x 365 = 9D�� ft. 3
62.4
(3) VOLUME FOR EXCESS RAINFALL:
(w) _ _�a2dft.
12
(4) VOLUME FOR 25 YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM:
6.7" x -.1 T (L) x _ /©O (W1 = _-_- - 9 ft. 3
12
TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED.
(1) +
(2) + /%�� (3)
+ /�(4)
_
-S%�—D�____
cubic feet
PLUS 1 FT. FREEBOARD ?

September 2, 1987
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Kenneth Johnson, Owner
Route 3, Box 277
Fairmont, North Carolina 28340
Dear Mr. Johnson:
SEP s 19,57
ENV i±AMA-Li�'1 EN
FAME TEVI E RAG. OFFICE
SUBJECT: Designation of Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operation
Johnson Swine Operation (SR 2277)
Marietta, North Carolina
Robeson County
This letter is to notify you that the Johnson Swine Farm located on
State Road 2277, which is a farrow to finish operation, is hereby
designated a concentrated animal feeding operation in accordance with
Title 15, North Carolina Administrative Code 2H.0123(a)(3), and adopted
Federal Regulations 40 CFR 122.23. The designation of your swine farm
was based on a site inspection conducted on Wednesday, August 5, 1987 by
members of the staff of the Fayetteville Regional Office. This
inspection showed that you had established a concentrated animal feeding
operation requiring such designation based upon the following facts:
1. It was determined that a pollutant discharge does occur from
subject operation through a man-made device, which eventually flows
into Alligator Swamp, Class "C" Swamp, surface waters of the State.
2. The subject operation houses less than 300 animal units (700
swine greater than 55 lbs, and 200-300 swine less than 55 lbs. at.
all times).
3. The discharge does occur. as a result of improper waste
management practices and is not the result of a 25 year, 24 hour
rainfall event.
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is
required for discharges of waste to the surface waters of the State.
However, if you can permanently eliminate the discharge by implementing

Mr. Johnson
Page 2
changes within sixty (60) days of your receipt of this Notice,
including, but not limited to, modifications to lagoons and the
implementation of a final waste disposal plan, a permit appplication
will not be required: If compliance has been achieved, you must notify
us in writing within sixty (60) days describing, in detail, the changes
or modifications you made.
If the discharge of waste to the"surface waters of the State is not
permanently eliminated within sixty (60) days of receipt of this Notice,
a NPDES permit application must be submitted within that time.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate, to the
Director, Division of Environmental Management, P. 0. Box 27687,
Raleigh, NC 27611. Assistance, if desired, can be obtained by
contacting Mr. Tommy Stevens Regional Water Quality Su ervisor Suite
714, Wachovia Building, Fayetteville, NC 28301, phone [phone].
The applications should be accompanied by construction plans for the
nondischarging animal waste management system.
For your information, the following items are enclosed:
1. One copy of the Federal Register - Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations, 40 CFR 122.23.
2. Three copies of NPDES Discharge Permit Application - Short
Form B.
If you need advice or technical assistance with regard to managing
animal waste, you should contact your county extension chairman or North
Carolina State University's Department of Biological and Agricultural
Engineering at [phone].
If you wish to contest this Designation, you must request an
administrative hearing within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this
Notice. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and
filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer
11666, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. A copy of the Petition should be
filed with this office.
If you do not request an administrative hearing, this Designation
will become final in thirty (30) days.

S
Mr. Johnson
Page 3
A copy of this letter is being sent to agricultural agency
representatives for information and to aid them in providing cooperative
assistance. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please
do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
IPREGItOU ISIGNED E?Y
R, EAU, ]DUDS
R. Paul Wilms
RR/fc
Enclosure
cc: M. J. Noland, Fayetteville Regional Supervisor
Mr. Edward L. Holland, District Conservationist, SCS
Mr. John Richardson, Extension Agent

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Juanita Johnson
Johnson Farms
Rt 3 Box 277
Fairmont NC 28340
Dear Juanita Johnson:
f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DLPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11,1998 RECEIVED
Ha 2 5 1998
FAYETTEVI LLE
AEG. OFFICE
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Johnson Farms
Facility Number: 78-42
Robeson County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997,
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is dill in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the'Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September' 1,1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along, with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%G recycled/10%a past -consumer paper

• '1
«SENDERI Campiete Items t and 2 vwhen"edditIMM serv}Cea ere ct r°�ed, endE com plate stoma" an a�
put yau�eddrtler Irt the "F(E f URN TO" spmca an the reverso aide. I:allure to da this will ptovent this a '
eerd #re—'1'rn #Wng roturned to yau. eturn el t as will rovltle you tha na W the.
d�1lVered tT o an t a at�"e o°'f�c}`ellvery. ar additlOnS F .,
portmastg or Bes�an �c ec c ox es} faredifI onal service(i) raque aid.
t.. � Shewga whom delivared,,dete,�nd addtasaees.addrfles. 2. ®Restricted Delivery. _ ,� � �r 4.
3. A IcIe Adtlraaed'to: �ArtIcI�IVia bey I • JEJ
Kenneth �lohnsan, Owner ` =��.x
Route 3, Box 2�77 '"rTV
p@ofr5eavl2834 isteredsuradk E
i_fi_edC]Dy
Q.� Always obtain signature of addressee or. t
e ant nd DA,TE DE I% Eb a L. !�
8!Slg�tetura,� AdiZ— � 8. Aifiiressee,�Aifdre=s ((ONL+Yrf ��- �
h, requcstedinnd jee patdJ-
X ` .rJ7 T' .ryl MI.
6. SMg dturo . Aganti x q
WNW of Delivery �a,r
,
�• out,
�r
PS'Porns 31Ri?ebi986"`k 7DQMESTICYRETt1AN✓:Cf»17 '

L
Also attached is a form (Form RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
belo,.v the tleshold established in l 5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to brine your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
Al-�_ 4., .4,
01
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DV1'Q Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycledll017c post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO. Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley
4 0 AfflWaA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RECEIVED
MAR 13 1998
FAYET'I`EVILLE
REG. OFFICE
�o
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number 7F �a
4
If you have any questions, please call me at 733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fox 919-715-6048
An Equal Opportunity Atrkmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Ststte of North C nrollran
Departnient of Divironment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): r ' z_ o
2. Facility No.
3. Facility Name: To 6 A&C o q N
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
Tu a-Al/'74a - c/ fah Als oAl
1 �� y} �
5. Mailing Address R�`,_ 80K__ 77._a�g .acrlter vI vI�_�?,J�Gt'�
Cit} _FA6, 11 O Ad State: C Zip: ,Z 8.3 4 P _
Telephone No.: (4L o
6. County where facility is located; /Qobeso /✓
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle): �G�I�ilJ
8. Application Date: & 9 / S>3 _
H. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and V►'ater Conservation District office and who makes .
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain art
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their. local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not.
document that they made a goad faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan b%, December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
l ., Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
Q- 029- 96
FORM SPAG V98
Page 1 of 4

2. Efforts made since. February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
�\aste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must.
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G, Other actions taken
1'!`_/9�ayC�liiaG IOpO/'SKi^(/ 7ay`P7Ooiti
a 6 cd f e r 4±n.
,� � ►�,,,, � 1H �f%I�.f11d�7!ar���a''"` �.c,►-i1/� ,,,�1 v,�. f%?�e m � F- C� jF►"c � i+r-
.Caodas��.61 me c-s
0
104�w -
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 2 of 4

-, J7• ..•...�W.K.Yi.�M��1�l lF.wu.�v�M..M� �..-�iMrN...a�.�......
4
H. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a ".
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were'rpost recently restocked_ at
this facility, The ENIC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
♦ '� p-M r3
Applicant's Certification:
1. _ , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with t1 EINIC has bee eviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knoMedge. 1 understand if all required pans of -this application are not completed and it all
General Statutes and Regulations. I understand that h tg rntqany. dates that arc! garopej
upon by m\-self and -the EMC will result in _appropriate enforcement actions -being taken bith
E\9 C. •
A,1 i a. a%4 AIS d Al _
Print Dame of Owner
Q4a J. , rt'�f�r�� __, Date Y 3�
Signa a of Owner ,
FORS[ SPAG 1/98
Page 3 of 4
M

I'
ie uired lifins;
Orrc(I)priginal and two�(2) coprrs of co n le uuerated
q.j)phcation.&rm--qlQLig with any atrach,liieisls.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND AIATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITN' SECTION
NO;N-DISCHARGE CONIPLIANCEIENFORCEAIENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535 '
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 4 of 4