900027_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Union County Lagoon Closures
Subject: Union County Lagoon Closures
From: "Ferguson, Mark - Monroe, NC" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:1141 -0500
To: <j ames.bealle@ncmail. net>
James:
The closure of two lagoons in Union County will be beginning this week.
The owner is J Hilton Brooks and the facility numbers are 90-27 and
90-44. The contractor is moving his equipment in today and told me he
will start agitating later this week. I expect these closures to take a
couple of months since the contractor only has one 5000 gallon spreader.
If you have any question or need any further information please email or
call me (704-233-1621 x.3).
Mark
1 of 1 5/22/2007 4:41 PM

) -J
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 13, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J. Hilton Brooks
3313 White Store Rd.
Wingate, NC 28174
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
H. Brooks Farm, Facility #: 90-27
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Brooks:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
August 4, 1998. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is
being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) due to the following deficiencies:
• Failure to have available your waste analysis records.
• Failure to have fescue included in your waste utilization plan as a cover crop.
AIso, the fescue in the waste application field needs to be improved.
• Excessive vegetation on the lagoon embankments.
• Failure to have a pumping marker (stop/start indicated).
• Failure to have available your completed waste application record.
In light of your deemed permitted status, the noted deficiencies are a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (a) and Administrative Code Section 15A
NCAC 2H .0217(d).
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by August 30,
1998, indicating the action taken on the deficiencies noted above. In responding,
please address your comments to the attention of Mr. Johnson. For technical
assistance please contact your local Soil and Water District representative or
agricultural extension agent..
91 9 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE 7o4-663-1699 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page Two
Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this or any other violations. If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex leason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rick Pigge, Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 12, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J. Hilton Brooks
3313 White Store Rd.
Wingate, NC 28174
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
H. Brooks Farm, Facility #: 90-27
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Brooks:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
April 7, 1999. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is
being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) due to the following deficiencies:
• Failure to have available your waste analysis records and waste utilization plan.
• Failure to have fescue included in your waste utilization plan as a cover crop.
• Failure to have available your completed waste application record.
In light of your deemed permitted status, the noted deficiencies are a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (a) and NC Administrative Code Section
15A NCAC 2H .0217(d).
Be reminded that these problems were also noted during last year's inspections,
and need to be addressed immediately. It is requested that a written response be
submitted to this office by May 7, 1998, indicating the action taken regarding the
noted deficiencies. In responding, please address your comments to the attention of
Mr. Johnson. Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water
Quality from taking enforcement actions for this or any other violations. For technical
assistance please contact your local Soil and Water District representative or
agricultural extension agent.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 IS
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 509,' RECYCLLO/I 0% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page Two
During many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are often
missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review.
The items below must be available for review during the inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, buffer zones, feed areas.
• Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis info: Should have-3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists that have been completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and completed could result in a
Notice of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste
applications should be applied during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in
the waste. In general waste should be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
Because you are no longer in operation, you may request to have your facility
removed from the active list on the state register. A Request For Removal form was
left with Mr. David Brooks for you to sign should you decide to do so.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water"Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rick Pigge, Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
R

- — Draft - Rcvised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number '47- -2z Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm'Name: acre. determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: e.�S Part 11 eligibility items) Ft F2 F3 F4
InspectorlReviewer's Name:. J ,rscOperation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: - 7 — j 7 exemption E9 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: Annual farm PAN deficit: ? pounds
:irrigation System(s) - circle 1. hard -hose traveler, 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. -stationary. sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5.,stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
El Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2ID3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist'in Part IL Complete eligibility
checklist, Part lI - F1.F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part I11).
PART II. 75% RuIe.Eligibility•Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Deterrnination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below: 1
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray-
field(s) according to farm's last two. years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields -fields-less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

i]mft - Rcvised January' 20, 1999
Facility Number - -
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS3
NUMBER NUMBER`` IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
sa-.1 E4_Q'
I I
F l 1 ! r
FIELD NUMBER'- hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER=- must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS3 - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 59%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irritation system.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
J. Hilton Brooks
J. Hilton Brooks Farm #2
3313 Whife Store Rd.
Wingate NC 28174
Dear J. Hilton Brooks:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
N.C. DEPT. OF
LNVIRQNMENT, HEALT2Ut.
January 24, 2000 & NATURAL RESOURCW
FEB 4 2000
fri11510A 1!F ENVIR611 TAI MANAGEMEM1
Subject: Removal of RegistraffivEsvllkf RIGION41 OFFICE
J. Hilton Brooks Farm #2
Facility Number 90-27
Union County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a li uid wastes stem
30,000 J.
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our
staff at [phone] ext 571.
Sincerely,
U
f Kerr T. Stevens, P.E.
cc: Mooresville Water Quality Regional Office
Union Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycledl10% post -consumer paper

UNION SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
604 LANCASTER AVENUE
MONROE, N. C. 28112
[phone] (EXT 101)
DATE: June 9,1999 •
TO: Mr. Hilton Brooks --
3144 Hwy 74 East
Monroe, N C 28112�
JUN. a .1 :•1999 ;
FROM: Berry D. Greene
District Coordinator
Union Soil'& Water Conservation -District .R Mr
SUBJ: Annual Lagoon Inspections -
Sir:
I personally did an annual inspection of both lagoons located on your property during the month of
May of this year. Some minor maintenance (mowing around the buildings and lagoon area) should be
completed as soon as it is practical time wise. No other apparent problems were noted. Thenwas
what appeared to be a dampened (slightly) area near the base of the dam at one facility, however,
this was investigated prior to this year by the District Conservationist and a representative from the
Division of Water Quality. No apparent or appreciable amount of seepage has been noted. 'There
was not apparent problem or danger which would threaten the waters of the state, either surface
runoff or ground pollution in my opinion. It appears just to be some type of wet -weather damp spot.
Sincerely,
Berry D. Greene
cc: case file
. Y.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
April 12, 1999
CERTIFIED _MAIL
RETURN RFCEIPT REQUESTED
J. Hilton Brooks
3313 White Store Rd.
Wingate, NC 28174
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
H. Brooks Farm, Facility #. 90-27
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Brooks:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
April 7, 1999. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is
being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) due to the following deficiencies:
Failure to have available your waste analysis records and waste utilization plan.
Failure to have fescue included in your waste utilization plan as a cover crop.
Failure to have available your completed waste application record.
In light of your deemed permitted status, the noted deficiencies are a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (a) and NC Administrative Code Section
15A NCAC 2H .0217(d).
Be reminded that these problems were also noted during last year's inspections,
and need to be addressed immediately. It is requested that a written response be
submitted to this office by May 7, 1998, indicating the action taken regarding the
noted deficiencies. In responding, please address your comments to the attention of
Mr. Johnson. Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water
Quality from taking enforcement actions for this or any other violations. For technical
assistance please contact your local Soil and Water District representative or
agricultural extension agent.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH C.AROLINA28115
PHONE [phone] F'AX 704-663-60AO
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page Two
During many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are often
missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review.
The items below must be available for review during the inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, buffer zones, feed areas.
• Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis info: Should have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists that have been completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and completed could result in a
Notice of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste
applications should be applied during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in
the waste. 1n general waste should be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
Because you are no longer in operation, you may request to have your facility
removed from the active list on the state register. A Request For Removal form was
left with Mr. David Brooks for you to sign should you decide to do so.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
% f,-?,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water -Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rick Pigge, Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

Dsvrsion of Soil and Water ConservaLon'- OpEr�tion Review` i 3 t
f - i Co
10
%©, tvtsion of. Soil and Water,Conservation - mplfiance In§pect.?.�on
Division of Water Quality - Compliance'Inspection 41
,
❑#
Qther,'AgenCy - Operation Review
outine Q Corn laint O Folloii,-ri) of DWQ ins ection Q Follow-u of DS%VC review Q Other
Facility Number Datc of Inspection
lime of inspection r 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted rtified j© Conditionally Certified [3 Registered ©Not O erationa/l� Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: �C1 tip`..... '... itG?`?<. .t'a"�C� Z County: ..lrLYli..Vl.........................................................
v�lpCJ.................................................... I home No: .Z .3 � �'
Owner Namc:...........lT/2...... *'.....�.....................................
r. ........:"........2-
Facility Contact: ...... t .�ls. ......... YZ? i.F ..........Title:.............................................................. Phone No:
.,
Mailing Address: ....... a3./.3....... .Gd.&.... ........ A.!'!� ...................... .......�'.►x1��1r�......................... ...��.7..f..
Onsite Representative:....) .fit all..`Gi ............ ./1....s................................ Intel;rator:................................................................................
.. ..
Certified Operator: ......... _* ....................................... .............................................. Operator Certification Number:...............................
.ocation of Farm:
t............................................................................ ............
Latitude Longitude � • �' �"
Design Current
awme t:apacety copulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish jM
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry _ Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream ImactS
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge origiriatcd iW ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was [lie conveyance nrmn-madc?
b. II' discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/win?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ',&—No
❑ Yes Z No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identl ficr:
Freeboard(inches): (i...............................................................................................................
1 /6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: �� —�� Date of inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, E] Yes KNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes %No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes �dNo
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
9.
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
❑ Yes
VNo
Waste Application
10.
Arc there any buffers that need nuiintcnance/impt'io-vcmcnl'?
❑ Yes
Wo
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
❑ Yes
❑ No
12.
Crop type ....... IC.; r. ._A4.e..........................:
13,
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
Yes
❑ No
14.
Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
❑ Yes
S1No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
JgNo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
%No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
Yes r-,
"No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
jYes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
A No
21,
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
14 No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
R No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
❑ Yes
J4No
[ : No.violations or. deficiencies .were noted during.ttiis-visit.. Y.ou will -receive nar further .'. •
• ieofrespoiidence: about: this :visit..
Comments (refer to question #): Explain'any YES answers arid/or any:'recommendations:or any other comments
Use drawin s'of facility to.better ex lain'situations. use additional pages as necessa
I SS / �y Ce!` c i C C.�. t�(�t �i'3 %mil. s 1r � r •f•O �i � r� ` - '►
$, 6�d� c%r..:�'D1 w�ee►,�w, .S Yt��c� � �� itn.�%t.�4
C.rCT AC6 Ao • tr �e..T; 3 e �� �/Q h c a `�s r- CIO s- m
✓a(� Le_ apv tra t I1, '0 CS CL u f s ► ►M1e_. cxa�
19j (. CLA!, ta-rPl ► c J1O t- r-e_ 1_ 1rWt ►1tk
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Q Date: -0 y_ 7— 9 9
1 /6/99

Draft - Revised January 20,1999
JUSTIFICATION R. DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number - �z Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: A�acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: cS Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
—1
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: 7 --1 j exemption El E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: Annual farm PAN deficit: -_ pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle : 1. hard -hose traveler, 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler. system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
fi, stationary gun system wlpermanent.pipe; 7, stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I. exemption.)
El Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
K E4 7 5% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibiiity
checklist, Part 11-.Fl F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part II1).
PART II.7511/11) Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination.
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below: 1
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of -wastewater (PAN) on spray,
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or Iack of info rmation/ma p.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, -irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2.acres-for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted .in table in Part III.

Draft - R:viscd January' 20, 1999
Facility Number -
Part Ili. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Ruie for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE O TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS'
NUMBER NUMBER'S IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
5b It - .11 r 1 1— 1
rill !"1 \11 IR1TYTti1 L..___1 _..fl �_-_ __ _�:_ �..._ ��._ !.- __��J :.� �1��� �21._IJ _.__L__ �l _.�__�!:__ __ I'•. 1f 1lL lA lr'f
I f��y ,�y,.1✓vl\-14�'1l1 p11L, r411, l.VI [V, VI '.I V411L f[VII4YG•�l fflp' VL VVVV Ifl r/Ip V�.r VI Ifr.4fJ Ilyll4V>•.IJ VGCJ�ilIVII 11�. VI! Vr1YY1Y14
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
s calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
MELD NUMBER2 - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of Its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 199B) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

41�
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
ms MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
NCDENR DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 24, 1998
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
'- J. Hilton Brooks
3313 White Store Rd.
Wingate, NC 28174
Subject: Site Inspection
�;•. 4Vwna C MCDEVITT_ J p
H. Brooks Farm, Facility #: 90-27
-M; E r ;, 'w Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Brooks:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA261 1S
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 509E RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown, for hay should be harvested in a timely mariner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for hjitrogen A pplication for Common Cro s:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 Ibs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and-8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely tarn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state Iab now has. the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
1 D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

MgVIl 6jI1 , LTALTEY .
a NATURAL RESOUP-CES
SEp 8 1998
I v
1

-f-b /
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 13, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J. Hilton Brooks
3313 White Store Rd.
Wingate, NC 28174
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
H. Brooks Farm, Facility #: 90-27
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Brooks:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
August 4, 1998. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is
�? being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) due to the following deficiencies:
• Failure to have available your waste analysis records.
• Failure to have fescue included in your waste utilization plan as a cover crop.
Also, the fescue in the waste application field needs to be improved.
• Excessive vegetation on the lagoon embankments.
• Failure to have a pumping marker (stop/start indicated).
• Failure to have available your completed waste application record.
In light of your deemed permitted status, the noted deficiencies are a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (a) and Administrative Code Section 15A
NCAC 2H .0217(d).
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by August 30,
1998, indicating the action taken on the deficiencies noted above. In responding,
please address your comments to the attention of Mr. Johnson. For technical
assistance please contact your local Soil and Water District representative or
agricultural extension agent..
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOOR ESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIV@ ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% AfrCYCLEO/t Oge' POST -CONSUMER PAPER

01
Page Two
Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this or any other violations. If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex leason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rick Pigge, Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
EWivision of Water Quality
IMoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up orDSWC review O Other I
Date of inspection
Facility Number .2
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered "'Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted D Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:................►..1. County:................. ....
OwnerName: .......................... A/Z4..... ........ 4_mgk5....................................... Phone No:...... c . ...` ` Z.........................................
Facility Contact. L.l sJ..►.�r�,...� ? 5............. Title:................................................................ Phone No:..5 �!U! ' .......
MailingAddress: ......3............wk.i.1�........ ......... 3.......... ....................................................
Onsite Representative: .............,......t.i-sh..........L►2�.V... .................. Integrator:....................................................................................
Certified Operator ;.......�.o..a..�................... 'Kem_—>................... . Operator Certification Number, ..... A ..
Location or Farm:
Gl r _1K.... 6,ov....... ..k�1.c.... i'I1Chi.�a................1�►.�....XtA..............1�.......�l.Il.... �. t!!'�.....lr..
)i%L .. ,d►cs.=....... 4......................a.�z.. G................................ ... .
Latitude [�•=, E2TI, Longitude ®• ©' DET "
ram¢ "I7estgnCurrent
DesignDesigner -;GurrenE
Sw�rte M,.
Capactty'Populatton
Poultry
"Capacity PopulaEion Cattle
Capacity, Populaiion
❑ Wean to Feeder
s�
Layer
E'. Non -Layer
`FEI
airy
❑Non -Dairy''
<..
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
:
❑ GiltsNO
� TotalSLW
❑ Boars
.3dZa
77 Number of Lagoons /Holding Pond$ > ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 0 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
W. �y
SF
-
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes P`k­-No
❑ Yes Wo
r
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Irgi No
❑ Yes ,&ZNo
❑ Yes LiNo
❑ Yes Kvo
❑ Yes k(No

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes kNo
structures fLagoous.Nolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes *0
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):........ 3 ..................................
.................... ................................... ..........................
.............................................. .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 9No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes KNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Ayes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Yes ❑ No
Waste A licat.ion
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ............ z!! 1O _L— vY..............:......................... .................. ....... ............ .................................. ................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? XYes ❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes A No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
71,Xes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
5Q No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
A,No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
%LNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
XYes
❑ No
For
Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
PNo
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
&No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
(No
0°No.violations-or. deficiencies.were not;ed,duriitg' this" visit:-:You:rvill receive' rn' &further
correspondence ab"out tlis;visit.. :.
wa��e� ��1; c c,��, o+-� r��o�r�s ►w� ava:� a�a !e
s
P S Gk� A4 caA C- ex f .
7/25197
Reviewer/Inspcctor Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: lo5lX�' __ Date: ;?/W

Count
Eneon
caner
Hilton IBrooks
manager
Address
Location
Certified
Farm Name
J. Hilton Brooks' Farm ##2 J
Phone Number
289-3764
Lessee
Region
WO—ARO p ITIRO / 0 WSKU
' / / /
ppprpx.xmlres.ill;. ofMonroe...1.m�..nortt�,oi.act.:ol.�Vlrttmire( K:1�52f)-&-WtiireNtore.KU-sK'1uwyon: +
]Tlt� Store �tti: ,oiligllt.,
Certified Operator in Charge
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
address on certi cation different but Rt address not used.
Date inactivated or closed
■ Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity '

Latitude
Longitude
p Request to be removed
Comments
p Removal Confirmation Recieved
Basin
Regional DWQ Staff Date Record Exported
❑ Vegetation
❑ Acreage
❑ Other
Name:lYadkin
to Permits Database

J. Hilton Brooks
J. Hilton Brooks Farm #2
3313 Whife Store Road.
Wingate'NC 28174
Dear Mr. Brooks:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION CFWATER(QUAL.ITY
May 12, 1998 m NA'iT131.A1,
MAY 15 1998
WIN U MTU0,14AL WCLt 2wYlill{
0 t11i hwa fff1u
SUBJECT: Designation of a Certified Operator in Charge
J. Hilton Brooks Farm #2
Facility # 90-27
Union County
North Carolina General Statute 90 A-47.2 requires the owner of each animal waste
management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid
animal waste management system, to designate a properly certified operator as the
Operator in Charge (OIC). Our records indicate that the OIC you previously
designated is no longer a certified animal waste management system operator.
As the owner of a registered animal operation with an animal waste management
system, you must designate a certified animal waste management system operator as
the Operator in Charge. Enclosed is an Operator in Charge Designation Form
specifically for your facility. Please return this completed form to this office by
June 12, 1998. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as
absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for
your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge.
If you have any questions regarding the certification of an operator, or need assistance
in locating a certified operator in your area, please contact
Cindy Dudley with the Technical Assistance and Certification Unit at
[phone] ext. 309.
Sincerely,
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance & Certification Unit
cd/Desig. of certified OIC
Enclosure
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATORS CERTIFICATION COMMISSION
P.O.Sox 29535, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 0% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
y '

r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Randall Morris
R. Morris Farm
411 Sandy Ridge Road, West
Monroe, NC 28112
Dear Randall Morris:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Or
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 20, 1998
=Wi&ot4ur,.%r'r. namin".
Ig NATURAL tzESOUltsI
MAR 5 t998
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
R. Morris Farm
Facility Number: 90-44
Union County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H ,0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C. G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. if you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer So % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Randall Morris
411 Sandy Ridge Rd.
Monroe, NC 28112
Dear Mr. Morris:
E)EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 13, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Morris Farm, Facility #: 90-44
Union County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on August 12, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of
this Office. You need to obtain the proper farm plan pertaining to your facility. Also, the records of
waste application should include the amount of nitrogen and the volume of waste applied. You should
also discuss with Mr. Hilton Brooks whether the facilities you are leasing should be placed on the
state register in your name or remain in his name.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc.: Union County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, lj&C FAX [phone]
VfMooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

19 u;ouune o wmpia1ut o ruuuw-up ui vvvV41uspecuun O rvuuw-up ui ir3vrk, review o vuner 1
I Facility Number I
Farm Status: E Registered 13 Applied for Permit
LCertiiied 13 Permitted
p Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Randall Morris Farm
Owner Name: Randall .................................. Morris .....................
Date of Inspection �Z
Time of 'inspection << 24 hr. (hh:mm)
County: Union .................................................. MRO...........
......... Phone No:.76.4-3545...................................................................
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address:.411.Sanpdy_..Ridge.Road..W................................................................. Monrae-NIC ........................................................... 28112 ..............
Onsite Representative: .... lif. r.VA' Q. ...... vvxcxx.. ..Lz . Integrator:
..........................................................................................................
Certified Operator:Randall.H........................... Morris .............................................. Operator Certification Number-19248 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude a ° iL
Longitude �� �f ^«rc.W—V%-on
SR /003
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes �Vo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes )goo
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes �&o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes I
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes *No
maintenance/improvement?
4130/97 Continued on back

7. DLd the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holdirtgronds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) Iess than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
........a......................
.......................................
....
...................................
....................
..........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste AnDlicatio
u Yes $.�No
❑ Yes p No
❑ Yes >R0
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes W
[]Yes NeNo
❑ Yes KNo
X'es. ❑ No
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 5No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... .........` 4!`>� lc-.tT...r,.�v.�C.r-.................................................................................................. .....................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? XYes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?.
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Qnly
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AYR P?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes //No
❑ Yes ;P'FNo
❑ Yes V.No
❑ Yes b'No
❑ Yes )No
Yes ❑ No
[]Yes ❑ No
Xes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name I (`r�} a �� � $�� ,
_ it diB 3I �3 'e d :dN?knr?�i�01:S . �ia3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: />��� Date: Q��
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Sectigfi acility Assessment Unit 4/30/97
Facility Number: 90_4 Date of Inspection
A4Iditlonal.GOmmen € d/OI DrflwCOgS r= w �� �a t t y ®�yt�rs�€ P� f ' tS7fln C
g, i�"fir "t IEll'

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresvi[[e Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
J. Hilton Brooks
3313 White Store Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear Mr. Brooks:
A "liA R
1DEHNR
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
H. Brooks Farm, Facility #a;: 90-27
Union County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed, This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, N�y4C FAX [phone]
Mooresville. North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 - 500/6 recycled/10co post -consumer paper
C

1
Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, I997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon Ievels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Union SWCD
AJ
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
Sincerely,
Z).. ; � --L-1 ,
D. Rex GIeas 90
P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James S. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
J. Hilton Brooks
J. Hilton Brooks Farm
3313 Whife Store Rd.
Wingate NC 28174
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: J. Hilton Brooks Farm
Facility ID#: 90-27
Union County
Dear Mr. Brooks:
t � e
Yy
[DF—=HNF;Z
N.C, DEPT. o-F
ENVIRO'\'NTI',NT, ;IEAL 01,
NOV F9 1 6
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. res oward, Jr., P.E. Di for
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687,`C_ Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 'r'M W*/o recycled/10% post -consumer paper