840008_PERMIT FILE_20171231

ar
w
1i�
Waste Structure Closure Plan
10-14-2004
This plan -has been -prepared for:--__.____._ This playa lips been developed by
Keith Hill Gerald McSwain
Keith A Hill Stwzly Soil, & Water Conservation District
8156 hill Ford Road 26032-C NeW Rd
Oakboro, NC 28129 Albemarle, NC 28001
704-485-3782 704-982-6811 Ext 3
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Waste Structure Closure Phan
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this closure plan.
Sigaature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
/Q-/.1- d i/
Date
This pian meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission..
Plan Approved By:/ ZdO�
Technical Specialist Signature
Date NC DEPT OF f-INVIR.CNMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RECEIVED
NOV 1 S 2004
- ---- ------
183859 - Database Version 3.1--�----------
-----Date Punted• -10-14-2004 Cover Pa 1
MOORESVILLE.REGIONAL OFFICE.
DWO-GROL!NoVJ,kTER SECTION

c
Waste Storage Closure Source Description
SOURCE:- La o6n Sludge
Date Measured: 06-02-2004
Lagoon Dimensions- TOP - 550 X 120; BOTTOM - 496 X 66; SIDE SLOPES - 3:1
Sludge Depth: 8.00ft.; Sludge Volume: 1,500,000 gallons. Waste Sample #: 8818 W
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen
Broadcast
9621
Incorporated
12400
Injected
13683
Irrigated
8980
Maximum PAN
Available (lbs.) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
9,621
18,865
-9,244
2,940,924
-1,440,924
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Maximum PAN Available is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the pian for this
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-14-2004 Desc. 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI)
and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided fnr each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of
P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
EMINEENOWNWO
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rhin g
LI
Sail Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal Applied
(lb>Jacre) (Ibslacre)
10346
1
14.2
14.20
Medium
10.0
Badin
rat, Gram
*55 bu.
28
NIA
172 1
1
13.101
13.10
Medium
10.0
Baden
Wheat, Gram
*55 bu.
28
N/A
172
10
12.7
12.70
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Gram
*55 bu.
28
NIA
172
11
4.90
4.90
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
N/A
172
2
3.7
3.70
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Gram
*55 bu.
28
NIA
172
4
7.8
7.80
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wbod, Grain
*55 bu.
28
NIA
172
6
2.1
2.10
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Graaf
*55 bu.
28
N/A
172
7
3.8
3.80
Medium
10.0
Baden
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
NIA
172
8
8.0
8.00
Medium
10.0
Baden
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
NIA
I72
9
6.2
6.20
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
NIA
177
1
22.8
22.80
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Cram
*55 bu.
28
NIA
177
2
7.6
7.60
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
NIA
177
3
18.4
18.4p_Medium
10.01
Badin
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
NIA
177
4
13.0
13.00
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
NIA
177
6
4.8
4.110
Medium
10.0
Baden
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu,
28
N/A
177
7
6.33
6.33
Medium
10.0
Baden
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
NIA
177
9
3.643.66
Medium
10.0
Baden
Wheal, Gram
*55 bu.
28
NIA
181
2
3.4
3.40
Medium
10.0
Baden
Wheat, Gram
*55 bu.
28
NIA
181
3
1.8
1.87,
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu,
28
NIA
181
5
18.0
18.00
Medium
I0.0
Badin
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
N/A
181
6
12-io
12.50
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu-
28
NIA
184
1
11.97
11.97
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
NIA
184
10
22.27
22.27
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Corin
*55 bu.
28
N/A
184
2
6.761
6.76
Medium
10.0
Baden
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
26
NIA
184
3
103
10.30
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
N/A
184
5
7.00
7.00
Medium
10.0
Baden
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
26
NIA
184
8
7.11
7.11
Medium
10.0
Balm
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
N/A
184
9
5.01
5.01
Medium
10.0
Baden
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28
N/A
183859 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/14/2004
PCs Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data

Planned Crops Summary
T
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Ratio B
LI
Soil Series
Crap Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal Applied
(msraero)(mslaore)
191
1
5.6
$.60
Medium
10.0
Badin
wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
28 NIA
1923
1 1-2
15.
15.0
Medium
10.0
Badir
Wheat, Oram
*55 bu.
28 NIA
1964
1-2-8
24.6
24.00
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Oram
*55 bu.
28 NIA
1964
10-11
6.6
6.00
Medium
10.0
Badin
Whrat, Gram
*55 bu,
28 NIA
1964
5
5.2
5.00
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Oram
*55 bu.
28 N!A
2013
1
6.2
6.20
Medium
10.0
Goldstar
Wheal, Grain
*40 bu.
20 NIA
2013
2
6,3
6.50
Medium
10.0
Goldston
Wheat, Grain
*40 bu,
20 N/A
2209
1
12.0
12.00
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Grain
*55 hu.
28 N/A
434
1
6.7
6.00
Medium
10.0
Badin
wheat, Gram
51 bu.
26 NIA
434
2,3,5
7.
7.70
Medium
10.0
Badin
Wheat, Gram
52 bu.
26 N/A
434
6
4.8
4.80
Medium
10.0
Chewada-P
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
33 NIA
8722
2,4,5
20.8
20.00
Medium
10.0
Bodin
Wheat, Gram
*55 bu.
28 N/A
8964
3
6.6
6.60
Medium
10,0
Badin
Wheat, Grain
*S5 bu,
28 N/A
9256
1
11.9
11.90
Medium
10,0
Baden
Wheat, Gram
*55 bu.
28 N!A
PLAN TOTALS: 399.50 396.38
.. iJt
._ .� }}..��[[
�;i,.
•{q :..rrF�=;Y"N'`�i�f: ��f:.f .'�. ..f
}��..9�^ [f4' /�/;,. /.•A .yy-..N>ry� J,�p
��i' k�(�sYiGitMi��
-� 'j4`A Sly.: .l'"yN P.'1�..,...1?, YSi t:1+1`- �.H.d2h C '�'LAJ..I .WI. { S�F T. �lfiSlf �r"- i •1,,.:i3
p.Ty,; � L h-5'�i syr,
�,� 7'echrr�crrl �'YI
prii3�
A./y;�
Ji}] 3LGi�(„(i{l! :!-lu�w;.h ort:
`l,. L I.; 1 ,Cr'3Fiiaxice� s< +:'� :a ph••l. 3is: ✓;•r:W+'A. �,�gp t�M1
�„', k,:a�if'r� •:1, f�k ,Y�Y
Low
w potential to contrkute to soluble
None
< 2nutrient
leaching below the root zone.
No adjustment needed; N based a hcation
> 2.0 to 4.0
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
x 2
soluble nutrient leaching below the
> 100
r- 10
root zone,
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) sbould be planned. Other conservation practices that
soluble nutrient leaching below the
improve the sods available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency
> 10
root zone,
should be considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients,
Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -71U (778), and edge -of -field practices such
as Filter Strips (3 93) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
P-,iiai�i• uiG
f {' 1 1,
'T�ik^ty i
M�i4�1�1f
l/'.
+, .�' 6..-. .?.
i Y �"r"
�.�w.:.. u lJierY4-•C
.t,.
t„ _�,j t irfYOZ.P.L"Y Vr't!71'F
K+ x �{�w�vp�y fD I� �.11f+„A'�;Y}_ �<
LMI _ I/�G�ii:Qi4li% //MVIa �-wi �13rY. hey
-, A.. 1 -T-W r 7'.tih'vi4+ X
s *la -4'3'"J .H:i✓w.vw: di'. Se �E,. �..
0.0 to 1.0
0-25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
> 1.0 to 2,0
25-50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based a hcation
> 2.0 to 4.0
51-100
High
Application limited to P removal
> 4.0.
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
183859 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/14/2004
PCS Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data

i
Land Application Table: Lagoon Sludge
Source Type: Closure
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
PLAT
Rating
Crop
RYE
Crop
Appliic.
Period
PAN
Req'd
bs/A
Manure
PAN
Applied
( Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
1000
gaUAcre
Applic.
Amount
�}
Appbc,
Method
N
N
10346
1
U1
Badin
14.20
14.20
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*51 bu.
911-4130
Broad.
*98
78
12.16
0.45
172
1
U1
Badin
13.10
13.10
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
911-4130
Broad.
132
63
9.82
0.36
172
10
U1
Badin
12.70
12.70
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
911A/30
Broad
106
35
5.46
0.20
172
11
U1
Badin
4.90
4.90
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
911-4130
Broad.
106
83
12.94
0.48
172
2
Ul
Badin
3,70
3.70
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9/1-4130
Broad
132
63
9.82
0.36
172
4
Ul
Badin
7.80
7.80
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
911-0130
Broad..
132
59
9.20
0.34
172
6
U1
Badin
2.10
2.10
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
911-4/30
Broad.
132
59
9.20
0.34
172
7
Ul
Badin
3.80
3.80
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
911-4130
Broad.
*98
56
8.73
0.32
172
8
U1
Badin
8.00
8.00
Mediumi
Wheat, Grain
055 bu.
911A/30
Broad.
106
25
3.90
0.14
172
9
U1
Badin
6.20
6.20
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9/1-4130
Broad.
106
40
6.24
0.23
177
1
U1
Badin
22.80
22.80
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9114130
Broad.
132
56
8.73
0.32
177
2
U1
Badin
7.60
7.60
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9/1-4/30
Broad.
132
56
8.73
0.32
177
3
U1
Badin
18.40
18.40
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9/14/30
Broad,
132
65
10.13
0.37
177
4
Ul
Badin
13.00
13.00
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9114130
Broad
132
68
10.60
0.39
177
6
U1
Badin
4.80
4.80
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9/1-4/30
Broad.
132
50
7.80
0.29
177
7
U1
Badin
6.33
6.33
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9114/30
Broad
132
44
6.86
0.25
177
9
U1
Badin
3.66
3.66
Medium
Wheat, Grain
055 bu.
9/14130
Broad
132
38
5.93
0.22
181
3
Ul
Badin
1.87
1.87
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9/14/30
Broad.
106
48
7.48
0.28
181
5
U1
Badin
18.02
18.00
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9/14130
Broad.
106
48
7.48
0.28
181
6
U1
Badin
12.50
12.50
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9114130
Broad
106
50
7.80
0.29
184
1
U1
Badin
11.97
11.97
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9114/30
Broad
132
52
8.11
0.30
184
10
U1
Badin 1
22.27 1
22.27 IMediumjWheat
Grain
*55 bu.
9114/30
Broad
*98
0
0.00
0.00
183859 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed. 10/14/2004
LAT Page 1 of 3

Land ADDlication Table: Lagoon Sludge
Source Type: Closure
Tract
Field
Source
ID :
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
PLAT
Rating
Crop
RYE
Crop
Applic•
Period
PAN
Req'd
bs/A
Manure
PAN
Applied
Obs/A)
Liquid
Manure
APpbed
gal/Acre
ga
Applin.
Amount
(Inches)
Applic.
Method
N
N
184
2
Ul'
Badin
6.76
6.76
Medium
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
9/IA/30
Broad.
98
58
9.04
0.33
184
3
U1
Badin
10.30
10.30
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9/14130
Broad.
,132
52
8.111
0.30
184
5
Ul .
Badin
7.00
7.00
Medium
Wheat. Grain
*55 bu.
911-4/30
Broad
106
53
8.26
0.30
184
8
U1
Badin
7.11
7.11
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9114/30
Broad.
106
0
0.00
0.00
184
9
U1
Badin
5.01
5.01
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9/1-4/30
Broad.
*98
0
0.00
0.00
191
1
Ul
Badin
5.60
5.60
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
911-4/30
Broad.
132
66
10.29
0.38
1923
1-2
U1
Badin
15.00
15.00
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9/14/30
Broad.
106
55
8.58
0.32
1964
1-2-8
U1
Badin
24.60
24.00
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9/14/30
Broad
106
56
8.73
0.32
'1964
10-11
Ul
Radii►
6.60
6.00
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9114/30
Broad,
106
40
6.24
0.23
1964
5
U1
Badin
5.20
5.00
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9114/30
Broad
106
53
8.26
0.30
2013
1
Ul
Goldston
6.20
6.20
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*40 bu.
9114/30
Broad.
96
0
0.00
0,00-
2013
2
Ul
Goldston
6.50
6.50
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*40 bu.
9114130
Broad.
96
0
0.00
0.00
2209
1
UI
Badin
12.00
12.00
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9114/30
Broad.
106
56
8.73
0.32
434
1
U1
Badin
6.70
6.00
Medium
Wheat, Grain
51 bu.
9114130
Broad
98
50
7.80
0.29
434
2.3,5
UI
Badin
7.70
7.70
Medium
Wheat, Grain
52 bu.
9114/30
Broad,
100
27
4.21
0.16
434
6
U1
Chewacla-P 1
4.80
4.80
Medium
Wheat, Grain
65 bu.
9/14/30
Broad.
121
28
4.37
0.16
8722
2,4,5
Ul
Badin
20.80
20.00
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9/14/30
Broad
106
58
9.04
0.33
8964
3
Ul
Badin
6.60
6.60
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9114/30
Broad
132
56
8.73
0.32
9256
1
U1
Badin
11.90
11.90
Medium
Wheat, Grain
*55 bu.
9114/30
Broad
106
65
10.13
0.37
i�
I
I
183859 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 10/14/2004
LAT Page 2 of 3

Land Application Table: Lagoon Sludge
Source Type: Closure
• NOTE: * indicates user defined value
183859 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 10/14/2004
Lagoon Sludge Summary:
Source Volume !'available: 1,500,000 gals.
Source Volume Applied: 2,940,924 gals.
Excess Application Capacity: 96.1 %
LAT Page 3 of 3
Manure
PAN
PANLiquid
Req'd
pli)
Applied
Manure
Crop
Obs(A)
Applied
Applic,
Source
Total
Use.
PIAT
Applic.
1000
Amount
(Inches)
Appbc,
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Rating
Crop
RYE
Period
Met)md
N
N
gal/Acre
• NOTE: * indicates user defined value
183859 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 10/14/2004
Lagoon Sludge Summary:
Source Volume !'available: 1,500,000 gals.
Source Volume Applied: 2,940,924 gals.
Excess Application Capacity: 96.1 %
LAT Page 3 of 3

Lagoon sludge often contains high concentrations of zinc and copper. High levels of these metals in soils can adversely affect plant growth The
following table provides a conservative (maximum potential) estimate for increase in soil index values.* Due to inherit variability of waste and soil
sampling, it is recommended that conservative soil target levels be set for copper (e.g. Cu -I < 700-1000) and zinc (e. g. Zn -1 < 300 for land where
peanuts may be grown; for other cropland Zn -I < 700-1000). Alternative application sites should be selected if the fallowing table indicates that
concentrations of these metals may approach excessive levels. For maximum copper and zinc soil index limits, see the NRCS Nutrient Management
Standard (Code 590).
Fetimnt,-A Cnil M,-fal rnnePntratinnc
Tract
Field
Soil Sam le
Crop
Source
ID
Applic.
Inches
Waste
Cu PPm
Waste
Za ppm
Soil Test
Cu -I
Soil Test
Zn4
Cu -I
Adj.
Zn-'
Adj.
Estimated New
Number
Date
Sail CU -11
Soil Zn -1
10346
1
23866-17 1
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.45
40
234
163
217
113
336
276
553
172
1.
BLP 01
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1-
0.36
40
234
427
298
90
.269
517
567
172
10
BLP05
10-13-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.20
40
234
456
321
50
149
506
470
172
11
BLP05
10-13-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.48
40
234
456
321
121
359
577
680
172
2
BLP02
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.36
40
234
452
380
90
269
542
649
172
4
BLP03
10-12-04
Wh.t, Grain
U1
0.34
40
234
537
390
85
254
622
644
172
6
BLP03
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.34
40
234
1 537
390
85
254
622
644
172
7
BLP4
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.32
40
234
1 531
508
80
239
611
747
172
8
BLP04
10-13-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.14
40
234
1 531
508
35
105
566
613
172
9
BLP06
10-13-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0,23
40
234.
395
251
58
172
453
423
177
1
RKP09
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.32
40
234
937
1,108
80
239
1,017
1,347
177
2
RKP 2
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.32 1
40
234
544
374
80
239
624
613
177
3
BLP3
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.37
40
234
384
220
93
276
477
496
177
4
RKPO4
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.39
40
234
j 431
187
98
291
529
478
177
6
BKPOS
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.29
40
234
628
544
73
217
701
761
177
7
BKP06
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.25
40
234
658
677
63
187
721
864
177
9
RKPO8
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0,22
40
234
867
1,041
55
164
922
1,205
* NOTE: The equilibrated post application soil index may be less than the projected maximum value. Practical methodology for more precise estimation is not available.
183859 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-14-2004 Metals Page I of 3

FetitnatPrl Cnil Metal renin,-ntrntinne
Tract
Field
Soil Sara le
Crop
Source
ID
Apphc.
Inches
Waste
Chi ppra
Waste
Zn ppm
Soil Test
Cu -I
Soil Test
Zn -I
CU -1
Adj.
Zn -I
Adj.
Estimated New
Number
Date
Soil Cu -I
Soil Zn -I
181
3
JJP5
10-13-04
eat, Grain
U1
0.28
40
234
334
117
70
209
404
326
181
5
JJP03
10-13-04
Wheat Grain
Ul
0.28
40
234
244
157
70
209
314
366
181
6
JJP04
10-13-04
Wheat, Fain
Ul
0.29
40
234
232
182
73
217
305
399
184
1
DFW01
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.30
40
234
707
626
75
224
782
850
184
10
DFW 08
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.00
40
234
398
278
0
0
398
278
184
2
DFW02
10-12-04
Wheat Grain
Ul
0.33
40
234
480
5631
83
247
563
810
184
3
DWF-03
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.30
40
234
501
820
75
224
576
1,044
184
5
DWI; 04
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.30
40
234
486
662
75
224
561
886
184
8
DWF 05
10-12-04
Wheat. Grain
U1
0.00
40
234
613
1,324
0
0
613
1,324
184
9
DWF 06
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0,00
40
234
506
511
0
0
506
511
191
1
FLOP 01
10-12-04
lWheat, Graiir
U1
0.38
40
234
342
352
95
284
437
636
1923
1-2
LLH01
10-14-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.32
40
234
.151
83
80
239
231
322
1964
1-2-8
HLB03
10-14-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.32
40
234
104
94
80
239
184
333
1964
10-11
HLB06
10-14-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.23
40
234
125
182
58
172
183
354
1964
5
HLB04
10-14-04
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.30
40
234
91
100
75
224
166
324
2013
1
23866
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.00
40
234
134
313
0
0
134
313
2013
2
23866
10-12-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.00
40
234
178
219
0
0
178
219
2209
1
TDH08
10-14-04
Wheat Grain
Ul
0.32
40
234
134
65
80
239
214
304
434
1
RSL04
10-13-04
Wheat, Grain
U1
0.29
40
234
256
228
73
217
329
445
434
2,3,5
RLSO4
10-13-04
eat, Grain
Ul
0.16
40
234
256
228
40
120
296
348
434
6
RLS06
10-13-04
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.16
40
234
238
190
40
120
278
310
8722
2,4,5
SAW01
10-14-04
Wheat, Grain
Ul
0.33
40
234
137
7
83
247
220
323
183859 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 10-14-2004
Metals Page 2 of 3
j

1Rctimatprl Qnil Metal rnnrpntratinns
Tract
Field
Soil Sam le
Number Date Crop
Source
ID
Applic.
Incites
Waste
Cu ppm
Waste
7n ppm
Soil Test
Cu -I
Soil Test
Zn -i
Cu -I
Adj.
Zu-IEstimated
Adj.
New
Soil cu-ij
Soil Zn -I
8964
3
KAH 05
10-12-04eat. Grain
Ul
0.32
40
234
230
366
80
239
310
605
9256
1
JJB01
10-14-04 Wheat. gain
Ul
0.37
40
234
77
53
93
276
170
329
183859 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-14-2004 Metals Page 3 of 3

GENERAL LAGOON CLOSURE INFORMATION:
Closure Start Date: 10-20-2004 Closure End Date: 12-01-2004
The landowner will remove the majority of the liquid prior to' contractor moving the sludge
portion of the lagoon.
CLOSEOUT CONDITION:
All waste will be removed and the bottom scraped Irior to certification of closure.
REMOVAL OF INFLOW DEVICES:
All inflow pipes to lagoon shall be removed prior to certification of closure
INSTALLATION OF SPILLWAY:
Install spillway accordding to USDA/NRCS recommendations Surface water will continue to be
diverted around lagoon. Lagoon is to have no drainage area at time of closure.
DESCRIPTION OF BUFFERS AND SETBACKS:
As per nutrient management plan
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------:---------------------
153859 Date Printed: 10-14-2004 info Page 1

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
iNSECT CONTROL
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
ODOR MANAGEMENT PLAN
FORM SLUR -1
FORM SLUR -2
FORM IRR -1
FORM IRR -2
------ i --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
183859 Date Printed: 10-14-2004 Info Page 2

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONF. M 1MRF,R 4
DWQ -7d '
EMERGENCY MANAGEM SYS K?-
SWCD A _ !o
MRCS D 7 -
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at
the facility. The following are some action items you shold take.
Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, tli s may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A Lagoon overflow -possible. solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Irnmediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates forthe fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to. eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
December .18, 1996

a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop urigatioa pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposedto
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the -embankment to catch all seepage, put
in a submersible pump, and pump back to the lagoon.
b. If holes am caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom
as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note anv obvious damages
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off ofthe property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number. 919-733-3942. Your phone call should
-include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details ofthe incident from item 2 above,
the exact location ofthe facility, the location or direction of movement ofthe spill, weather
and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been undertaken, and the
seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number -
c_ Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for adviceAechnical assistance phone number - -
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem
to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
2. December 18, 1996
F __

S. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site
damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who ceit£ed the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.
a. Name:
b. Phone:
7. implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repairthe system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems
with release of wastes from happening again. ,
3 December 18, 1996

Ventilation exhaust fai • Volatile eases; ❑ Fan maintenance;
• Dust C] Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces • Dust ❑ Vacuum or washdown between flocks;
Manure conveyors • Partial microbial decomposith ❑ Keep mechanical equipment in good repai
O Remove manure accumulations promptly
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decompositic ' ❑ Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface ❑ Tank covers;
❑ Basin surface mats of solids;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Manure slurry or s Agitation when spreading; ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
sludge spreader • Volatile gas emissions ❑ Wash residual manure from spreader after
outlets ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure • Volatile gas emissions while © Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
slurry or sludge on drying ❑ Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.
field surfaces
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 6
Poultry Layer Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist .
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Suecific Practices
Farmstead
• Poultry Productior
❑
Vegetative or wooded buffers;
❑
Recommended best management practices.
Good judgement and common sense
Floor surfaces (walk
• Wet dirtv Surfaces
' ❑
Scrape manure, dust, feathers into `
aisles)
❑
SpieggoaaWalong upper ends of
C3
ollection a . q,
'roper vent tion
Cage manure
• Manure -covered surface
❑
Scrape manure into collection alleys
dropping boards
Manure collection alley
• Partial microbial decompositic
❑
Frequent manure removal by flush or scrape,
❑
Frequent checks and maintenance om
waterers and water pipes
Ventilation exhaust fai • Volatile eases; ❑ Fan maintenance;
• Dust C] Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces • Dust ❑ Vacuum or washdown between flocks;
Manure conveyors • Partial microbial decomposith ❑ Keep mechanical equipment in good repai
O Remove manure accumulations promptly
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decompositic ' ❑ Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface ❑ Tank covers;
❑ Basin surface mats of solids;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Manure slurry or s Agitation when spreading; ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
sludge spreader • Volatile gas emissions ❑ Wash residual manure from spreader after
outlets ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure • Volatile gas emissions while © Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
slurry or sludge on drying ❑ Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.
field surfaces
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 6

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Swific Practices
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown _
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater 1 Extend discharge point of pipes `
lagoon conveyance underneath lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volitile gas emission; ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; 0 Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
❑ Minimum agitation while pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven bioloeical additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation; Irrigate on dry days with little or no wing
nozzles • Wind drift t Minimum recommended operating prod
© Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon -
Dead birds • Carcass decomposition n Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead bird disposal pits • Carcass decomposition n Complete covering of carcasses in burial p
rl Proper location/construction of disposal F
rl Disposal pit covers tight fitting
Standing water • Improper drainage Grade and landscape such that water
around facilities • Microbial decomposition of drains away from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access roa. Farm access mad maintenancF
public roads from
farm access
Additional Informatior Available from:
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 7

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Poultry Manure Management; .0200 Ride/ BMP Packet
Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Management: High Rise, Deep Pit; EBAE 131-88
Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Management: Undercage Flush -. Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 130-88
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Proper. Disposal of Dead.Poultry; PS&T Guide No. 19
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107,1995 Conference Proceedings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 8
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU -BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - Poultry Science
Florida Cooperative Extension

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Snecific Practices
Farmstead
•
Swine Production
❑
Vegetative or wooded buffers;
Cl
Recommended best management practices.
❑
Good judgement and common sense
—Animal body surfaces
•
Dirty manure -covered animal
Cl
Dry floors
Floor surfaces
•
Wet manure -covered floors
❑
Slotted floors;
❑
Waterers located over slotted floors;
D
Feeders at high end of solid floors;
❑
Scrape manure buildup from floors;
O
Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits
•
Urine;
❑
.Frequent manure removal by flush, pit
•
Partial microbial decompositic
rechargge, or serape;
C3Underfloor
ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fat
•
Volatile eases;
❑
Fan maintenance;
•
Dust
❑
Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces • Dust ❑ Washdown between groups of animals,
❑ Feed additives;
❑ Feed covers;
❑ Feed delivery downspout extenders to
feeder covers
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling 17 Extend fill to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilat
conveyance
Pit recharge points • Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Extend recharge lines to near bottom of
liquid while pits are filling pits with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank O Sump tank covers
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 3

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
filling and drawdown
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
End of drainpipes at
•
Agitation during wastewater
❑
Extend discharge point of pipes
lagoon
conveyance
underneath lagoon liquid level `
Lagoon surfaces
•
Volatile gas emission;
❑
Prover laeoon liquid cavacity;
•
Biological mixing;
❑
Correct lagoon startup procedures;
•
Agitation
❑
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
❑
Minimum agitation when pumving;.
❑
Mechanical aeration;
❑
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler
•
High pressure agitation;
❑
lrrieate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles
•
Wind drift
❑
Minimum recommended oueratine pressure;
❑
Pumn intake near iavoon liquid surface:
❑
Pump from UCcand stagg Jagoon
Storage tank or basin
•
Partial microbial decompositio
❑
Bottom or midlevel loadinv:
surface
•
Mixing while filling;
❑
Tank covers:
•
Agitation when emptying
❑
Basin surface mats of solids;
Settling basin surface
•
Partial microbial decompositio
❑
Extend drainpipe outlets underneath
•
Mixing while filling;
liquid level;
•
Agitation when em t in
n
Remove settled solids reeularly
Manure, slurry or
•
Agitation when spreading;
n
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
sludge spreader
•
Volatile gas emissions
rl
Wash residual manure from spreader after usg
outlets
rl
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure,
•
Volatile gas emissions while
rl
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
slurry or sludge on
drying
n
Soil incorporation within 48 hrs.;
field surfaces
rl
Snread in thin uniform lavers for ranid drvinc
rl
Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 4

Source Cause' BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals - • Carcass decomposition r7 Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal • Carcass decomposition rl Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
pits rl Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators • Incomplete combustion rl Secondary stack burners
Standing water • Improper drainage; ❑ Grade and'landscape such that water
around facilities • Microbial decomposition of drains away from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access roa. ❑ Farm arress road maintpnanrF
public roads from
farm access
Additional Informatior Available From:
Swine Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP-Packet
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE Fact Sheet
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-88
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH -33
Environmental Assurance Program: NPPC Manual
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107,1995 Conference Proceedings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 5
NCSU, County. Extension Center
NCSU-BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - BAE
NCSU - Swine Extension
NC Pork Producers Assoc.
NCSU - Agri Communications
Florida Cooperative Extension

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Inserts Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters • Accumulation of Solids © Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids
O Weem n'tVsas g o ac cdmulated solids at dischar
Lagoons and Pits • Crusted Solids O Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits
where pest breeding is apparent to
minimize the crusting of solids to a depth
of no more than 6 - 8 inches over more
than 30% of surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation O Maintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to
prevent accumulation of decaying
vegetative matter along'water's edge on
impoundment's perimeter.
Feeders • Feed Spillage O Design, operate and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
cumup Pg deca�inxwastba�e (g.
O lean u s a on r Pm es fs e. 7
-10 day interval during summer;15-30 day
interval during winter).
Feed Storage • Accumulation of feed residuF O Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed
storage areas by insuring drainage away
from site and/or providing adequate
Os�`ogorc na
' ent coin veredbbin r
r �iQve i h,�m�istur
so'rage as�needed. 5 5 around
AMIC - November 11, 1996,

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Insects Site Specific Practices
Animal Holding Areas • Accumulations of animal 0 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture
wastes and feed wastage alongfences and other locations where
waste accumulates and disturbance by
O NfkWkhi @R*V"s and filter strips
around animal holding meas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (Le. inspect for
and remove or break up accumulated
solids as needed.
Dry Manure Handling • Accumulations of animal wa: 0 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g,
Systems 7-10 day interval during summer; 15-30
day interval during winter) where manure
mnurefstockpfles.
Dpect or an remove or break up
accumulated wastes in filter strips around
stockpiles and manure handling areas as
needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State
University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613
AMIC - November 11, 1996,
Gil

Form UM -1
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Field Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner Facility Number -
Spreader Operator
FieldSize
IrrigationTime,
Number of

Form MR -2
Tract #
Field size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Field .#
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN
Loading (lb/acre) = (B)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
(9) (10) (11)
Date
(mm/dd/yy)
Irrigation
Waste Analysis
PAN 1
(lb(1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(lb/acre)
(8) x (9)
1000
Nitrogen Balanc
(lb/acre)
(B) - (10).
Start Time
(hr:n in)
End Time
(hr:min)
Total Minutes
(3)-(2)
# of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow rate
(gal/min)
Total Volume Volume per Acre
(gallons) (gal/acre)
(4) x (5) x (6) (7)
(A)
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator Certification #
• . 1 NCDA Waste Analysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (I1) following each application event.

Farm SLUR -1
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
For Recording Slurry and Lagoon Sludge Application Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner Facility Number
Spreader Operator
Date Field Size Application # of Loads , Volume of Loads(2)
Trari a Meld (MMhIj&r) CMD L= (ac=1- Per Field (gallons) -
(t)
(1) SI = soil inootporated (disked); BR = broadcast (surface applied)
(2) Can be found in operators manual for spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.

Form SLUR -2
Tract #
Field size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Field #
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Facility Number
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN
Loading (lb/acre) = (B)
n r� rz rdi rai rr) rn rsri
Date
mrrt/d
# of Loads Per Field
Volume of Loads(')
Total Volume
(gallons)
2 x 3
Volume per Acre
(gals/acre)
Waste Analysis (2) PAN
lbs/1044 is
PAN Applied
(lbs/acre)
6 )1+1,000
Nitrogen Balance(3)
(lbs/acre)
- 7
Crop Cycle Totals I f
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator Certification #
(1) Can be found in operators manual forthe spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owners manual.
(2) See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required withip 60 days of land application events.
(3) Eaterthe value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application evert.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Keith Hill
8156 Hill Ford Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Dear Mr. Hill:
e��
EDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 25, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Penny HIII Farm, Facility #: 84-8
Stanly County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on June 20, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. The
facility was in good shape. However, you need to contact the Natural Resource Conservation Service to verify your
certification status and to receive all the pertinent forms and records concerning waste application. As a certified
farm your files, at a minimum, should contain the following:
Certification forms
Site diagram (fencing, streams, property lines, etc...)
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste management/utilization plan
Soil/waste analysis records
Emergency Plan
Odor, insect, & mortality control
It is suggested that all pertinent information be maintained in a single notebook.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. Also, please
be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation as well
as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. If you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely, ;.
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Stanly County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street,��� FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Aifitmattve Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 _ 50M recycled/ 10% post -c onsumer paper

li
DSWC :Animal Feedlot Operation Review
WWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Q-ftoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number � •mm hh
. hr
Time of Inspection . 24 ( )
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex: t.25 for 1 hr l5 min)) Spent on Review
Wertified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel and processing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated : ...... ....... ................... ......... ........... ....... .......................... ........ ........ ........................ ...................
FarmName: ........(a..t f .../ f....��... r:.rl.� ti .......................... .......... ...... County: . .....................................................
Land Owner Name:... , .......................................... Phone Na: .......f .es............. �........
.....I................. ...
Facility Conetact:...............................................................`.................. Title:.......................................` ..
........ Phone No:........................................................
MailingAddress:.... -2 ?. �.�......al'l.�...... �` � r............�i41........I.................. .......4.6klcr................................................ ......
Onsite Representative: ....... LS,........... 8X..&.................................................................. Integrator......... ...................................
Certified Operator: ..... K...A.L�...................p
..tl ................................................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
...............: :...... ......................<</....... .... . r �r.�. c........... Q
........1...[...? �.......E..Y ... ........... s...n.... F. �... r r ......................... .....................�.........................• a
Latitude • 4 °` Longitude • '•
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30197 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes OkNo
❑ Yes ;&,No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
$ No
❑ Yes
[KNo
❑ Yes
MNo
Continued
on back

10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 10 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ®.No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
VI'astcplicas tion
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify D//WQ)
15. Crop type.....cyr..s.S.;'............................ 1... Gc :e. .........................
r...... ......................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes RNo
7, Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 19�No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes Aq No
9Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes t!�No
Continents (refer to question #):. Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other. comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Facility Number: ...... . ....... Z ............. .
4
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
, No
7.
{
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
f �No
Structuas
wwouf r Holding Pods)
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 10 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ®.No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
VI'astcplicas tion
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify D//WQ)
15. Crop type.....cyr..s.S.;'............................ 1... Gc :e. .........................
r...... ......................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes RNo
7, Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 19�No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes Aq No
9Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes t!�No
Continents (refer to question #):. Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other. comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
c 1, i 1i
� L; n �t 5 cy C ''� 3 G1 r CiS a C L� �7 6 ti c� i 5 O �C1 G v�
4
�iatu��t5c ask cr ���ec. �tnt 64- koS tip'' -
re c- 'A 4k� C'`�Pe�^w`"Ae. �� fl-c"erk5 ka mitt -s,,
a
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: Z C%
l G
cc: Division of Water Qualih; Water Qualit), Sekh
:Pd, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

el
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT CE
AGRICULTURE
Keith Hill
Penny Hill Farm
8156 Hill Ford Rd.
Oakboro, N.C. 231229
NATURAL PESOURCES
CONSERVATION
SERVICE
XC, DEFT. OF
RwRONMETn HEALTH,
A NATURAL RESOURCES
AUG 1 3 1991
DIVia GF F.MNEw? `AL din, '"
IMATRa MAL
26032-r NEWT ROA
ALSEMARLE, NC 22001
704/ TO=--bB1
DATE : 7- 3 .tea- 7
Dear Keith
As per the site investigation by Alan 3ohnson of DEHNR on 6-20-97 it
appears that you failed to have a copy of the waste management plan Ne
provided to you on 9-20-96. Enclosed you will find a replacement copy along
with the certification, forms provided to DEHNR and you on 4-28-97. i have
included the odor, insect: and mortality control sheets requested. I have
also enclosed an emergency action plan that should be kept and implemented
in case of a iaa000 overflow or breach. Also I have sent you additional
blank record keeping forms. Use these blanks to make copies as needed for.
record keeping. These items were not required at the time your original
waste management plan was written.
Irk respect to the certification: status it is my understanding that
status is maintained and should be verified by DEHNR as livestock coeration
certification is a state program and not, administered by NRGS. We have a
copy of the certification forms submitted to DEHNR in our files, huwe�er
official status should be determined by DEHNR.
All the pertinent forms and information should be -contained its this
one folder provided as suggested by Mr-. Gleason.
Si '' v.
000
Richard E. Pio❑
Conserv. Tech.
cc: Darryl Harrington
Alan Johnson-DEHNR
SWCD case file

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Water Pollution Control System Operator Certification Commission
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Coleen H. Sullins, Chairman
February 19, 2001
Keith A. Hill
8156 Hillford Road
Oakboro NC 28129
Re: Animal Waste Management Certification Renewal
Certificate Holder: Keith A. Hill
County: Stanly
Dear Mr. Hill:
A LTIFAA
NCDENR
Senate Bill 1217, enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly in 1996, states "a certificate holder who fails to
renew their certificate and pay the renewal fee within 30 days of its expiration shall be required to take and pass the
examination for certification in order to renew the certificate".
You were mailed an invoice in October 2000 notifying you that your certificate would expire December 31, 2000, and
that a $10.00 annual renewal payment was due by that date. The 30 -day grace period ended January 30, 2001. Since
your payment was not received, your certificate expired effective December 31, 2000. Therefore, you do not possess a
valid animal waste management certificate. Please note that without a valid certificate, law prohibits you from
performing the duties of an Operator in Charge of an animal waste management system.
The next available opportunity to retake the Animal Waste Management System Operators certification examination
will be June 14, 2001. An examination application is enclosed for your use. Please note that a completed examination
application must be postmarked 30 days prior to the examination that you wish to take. If you did not intend to renew
your animal waste management certificate or do not wish to get recertified, you may disregard this letter and your
animal waste management system operators certification will remain invalid.
Please call Beth Buffington at 919-733-0026, extension 313, if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Dwight Lancaster, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
enclosures
cc: TAC Files
Mooresville Regional Office
1618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1618
Phone: 919 -- 733-0026 1 FAX: 919 - 733-1338
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNrrY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/ 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Keith Hill
Penny Hill Farm
8156 Hill Ford Rd.
Oakboro NC 28129
Dear Keith Hill:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
N.C. (1 r -t'. rar'
March 3, 1998 IUWIR�O NH!t ` T. tit
MAR 5 1998
o116L91t .3f 14VW=M1U r114 1 MUR
HftMmAtE UWAL to
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 84-8
Stanly County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of I SA NCAC 2H.0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan and contact the Division of Water
Quality prior to stocking animals. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans
are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poulqy with a liquid waste system 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Mooresville-Water-QUali ff Re`gional--OfSce7
Stanly Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Sox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

V�\ft
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DNISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 13, 1998
Keith Hill
8156 Hill Ford Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Subject: Request for Removal
Penny Hill Farm, Facility #:84-8
Stanly County, NC
Dear Mr, Hill:
The form sent in requesting to be removed from the register was considered a
verification by a second party. I have enclosed a Request For Removal form for you to fill
out and sign. Please forward the form to the address located at the bottom of the sheet.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact
me at [phone].
AJ
Sincerely,
Alan D. John n
Environmental Specialist II
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MaoRE5V I LLE, NORTH CAROLINA 261 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -S0% RECYCLED/10% POSY -CONSUMER PAPER

Keith Hill
8156 Hill Ford Rd,
Oakboro, NC 28129
Dear Mr. Hill:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 13, 1998
Subject: Request for Removal
Penny Hill Farm, Facility #:84-8
Stanly County, NC
The form sent in requesting to be removed from the register was considered a
verification by a second party. I have enclosed a Request For Removal form for you to fill
out and sign. Please forward the form to the address located at the bottom of the sheet.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johnr n
Environmental Specialist II
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOOR ESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIvE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
.James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Keith Hill
8156 Hill Ford Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Dear Mr. Hill:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 5, 1998
Subject: Operator -in -Charge Certification
NCGS 90A-47.2
Penny Hill Farm, Facility #:84-8
Stanly County, NC
As of January 1, 1998 all facilities must have a certified Operator -In -Charge. A review of
the database does not show this to be the case for your facility. Failure to have a Certified Operator -
in -Charge is a violation of NCGS 90A-47.2.
If you or the designated operator for the facility have not taken and passed the required exam,
an interim certified operator should be obtained. If you have already taken the exam, you may want
to contact Ms. Cindy Dudley of the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification
Commision (WPCSOCC) at 919-733-0026.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. AIan
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Stanly SWCD
Regional Coordinator
F.%
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 North Main Street, N4*
14C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 5001. recycled/100% pas --consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Keith Hill
8156 Hill Ford Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Dear Mr. Hill:
QHHNFR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 25, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Penny HIll Farm, Facility #: 84-8
Stanly County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on June 20, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. The
facility was in good shape. However, you need to contact the Natural Resource Conservation Service to verify your
certification status and to receive all the pertinent forms and records concerning waste application. As a certified
farm your files, at a minimum, should contain the following:
Certification forms
Site diagram (fencing, streams, property lines, etc.
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste management/utilization plan
Soil/waste analysis records
Emergency Plan
Odor, insect, & mortality control
It is suggested that all pertinent information be maintained in a single notebook.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. Also, please
be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation as well
as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. If you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Stanly County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, 4 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affitmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

"outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered [I Applied for Permit (ex:.1.25 for 1 hr .15 min)) Spent on Review
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processine)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated* ...................... ...........
yf.Farm Name: ............ ..�.t{....... ('!....z�F./h..............................................
Land Owner Name:... .t.Tz ......., ..... A-1 ................................................
County:
PhoneNo: ........ 1'.T..��........ ».......................
FacilityConctact: .................................................................................. %Title:...........................................`...... Phone No: ......................................... ........q........
Mailing Address: ....{.�fP........ /111//....Fa!.......... k�?..! kd ............................. ....... 1�. f�.............................................,�.. .� ...i......
Onsite Representative: ..... ..6�............ 1.7..(..Z,1 .......... Integrator: ELI( MA.: ek.e.................
Certified Operator:.....Kla..l:..T`^................... �4.A.U................................................ Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• ��«
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Design Current° Desig!Q urr,,,.. Design Current
Swilled 4 . _ *mss POUIt i4 s': s ,: Cattle , ,„ o- F
V�.� f Ca4Yaci 1'a lilatian l?' Ca acl < Po 'ulatyon Ca act Po ulatlon
❑Wean to Feederr ❑ Da'
❑ e El NonaeFeederto ❑ Non Da
ISt
X.
0 Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder T�gtalDt sigma Capacity
Farrow t Finish y
Total'SSLW er,
��Nuinber ofLgoans/Holding Ppnds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area Field ❑ Spray Fi Area
eneral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes PkNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes JkNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes S No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes (XNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes MNo
4130/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

Facility Number: ............... . ..............
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Stastures (lagoons and/or Holding Ponds/
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
.............1........_. ............. ...... 2:..".. ...........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type Cac. ...... s.iRtifr..............................................:/�..a.rn.�...... ................................. .
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
For_Certifltd Facilities Only.
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes ,� No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ;RNo
Structure 6
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes J&No
❑ Yes RNo
14 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 19�No
❑ Yes )4 No
❑ Yes fiU No
❑ Yes Jallo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes JZ No
❑ Yes ARTNo
&rYes ❑ No
❑ Yes UIo
[:]Yes A!INo
rpt `lnat� t 4S�o.n, 3YA I�Soat�1P�VA 5 '0 c� ov
ivy � w%' b kcx5 "A5
ck<< <%L.e� �4Perw�v�e t�� r1 -eels ka ��..� a a� wkcsol
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: ('0'0 — 7_0"F]
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Se ti , Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Keith Hill
8156 Hill Ford Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Dear Mr. Hill:
0
OZZ
EDEF.HNF:Z
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Penny Hill Farm, Facility #:84-8
Stanly County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the foilowing
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street,N�y�C
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity(Affirmative Action Employer
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Voice 704-663-1699
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. ,OeWn,;�
Water Quality gional Supervisor
cc: StanIy SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
Keith Hill
Penny Hill Farm
8156 Hill Ford Rd.
Oakboro NC 28129
Dear Mr. Hill:
EDEHNR
N.C. DEPT. OF
ENv1P0NMFNT, HEALTx:
& NATURAL1�ir�C)Ui.(:i?S
DEC 17 1996
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Penny Hill Farm
Facility ID #: 84-8 DIYISl61! 4F [RYIII0IiIEll1Al I,AIIAnEi,3ENT
Stanly County tlCE;11LSY11LE RLB,ifl1AL 6FFlCE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Bang Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
2� Ste�e�
FOR
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control Systeme Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certiticatlon Commission An Equal Opportunity/Afnrmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Ralelgh, NC 27626-0535 _ 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site requires immedlate aden6m
Fad lily number ��
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: 1995
Owner: )(CIA f1,1._ _ Farm Name: _d"J1
County: — -
Agent Visiting Site: Fhone:
Operator, K—e.,A Phone: 7py1�37$z._
On -Site Representative: Phcne:
Physical Address:
cs ale _a'(�
, "ll -_gtj J�,�
.baa " o A klaro
Mailing Address:
__$!sG -W;17-44
Rd
4%k4aroe, IJC. _
e/39
Type of Operation;
Swine
V"' -poultry
Cattle
Design Capacity;
�b/> _
Number of Animals on Site:? Dao rs
Latttude. 315 °
t/ 55 "
Longitude:
860
Type of Inspec,,ion:
Ground
Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does 'the Arimal `Naste L agcon have su',icient freeiroardpf ,soot 25 year 24 hour stcr,n event
,'approximately 1 Fcct + 7 inches) [�� or No
Actual Freeboard:
,..A Foot & Inches
.-Cr facilities with nitre than one lagoon, please address to other lagoons' freeboard under the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed trona the lagoon(s)? Yes orv0
Was there erosion of the dam? Y s or uo
Is adecuate land available for lard application? or No
Is the carer crop adequate?t e or Vo
Sri —
Signature of .Agent
Fax to [phone]