800025_PERMIT FILE_20171231

RECMEDMCDENRIDWR
®� MAY 13 2 015
'�� WQROS
AM= MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
'�
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Gerald Foster
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)
13210 Cool Springs Road
Cleveland, NC 27013
Dear Gerald Foster,
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
May 8, 2015
Subject: Permit No. AW1800025
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)
Animal Waste Management System
Rowan County
Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject animal waste permit with the
submission of a rescission request letter received on December 2, 2014. In accordance with your
request, Permit No. AWI800025 is rescinded, effective immediately.
Please be aware that, all of the following requirements apply upon this permit rescission:
1. The cattle facility shall be subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 02T .1303 (Permitting
By Regulation) and 15A NCAC 02T .0113 (Permitting By Regulation) until the containment
area is closed in accordance with standards adopted by the NRCS.
2. The permittee shall maintain records of land application and weekly records of containment
basin waste levels on forms provided by or approved by the Division.
3. Closure shall include pre -notification to the Division and, within 15 days of completion of
closure, submittal of a closure form supplied by the Division or .closure forms approved by
the Division that provide the same information required by the forms supplied by the
Division.
If, in the future, you wish again to operate this animal waste management system at or
above the permitting threshold of 100 confined cattle, you must first apply for and receive a
new animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone: [phone] Internet. www,ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunely 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in pari by recycled paper

Any future permitted animal waste management system shall be considered a new facility and
subject, to- current permitting and design requirements at that time (Session Law 2013-413).
Op'erafiiig an animal waste management system without a valid animal waste permit Certificate
of Coverage will subject the responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
Please contact the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Lor S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G.
Director, Division of Water Resources
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Beth Buffington, NC Public Water Supply Section, Protection and Enforcement Branch
Rowan County Soil & Water Conservation District
Teresa Revis, DWR Budget Office
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWI800025)

NCDEE R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natura
Pat McCrory
Governor
Shelbia C. Foster
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)
13210 Cool Springs Road
Cleveland, NC 27013
Dear Ms. Foster:
September 14, 2015
Resources
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)/Facility 80-25
General Permit AWI800025
Rowan County
On March 26, 2015, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the La -Foster Farm (Foster Road) and
the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting
during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jtam. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated March 26, 2015
ib
Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E=ast Center Avenue, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmafive Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

■ Division of Water Resources
❑
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El
Other Agency
Facility Number:
800025 Facility Status:
Inactive Permit: AWIBDD025 [] Denied Access
tnpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
_ County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit:
0312612015 EntryTime: 11;00 am
Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident #
Farm Blame:
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)
Owner Email:
Owner:
Shelbia C Foster
Phone: [phone]
Malling Address:
13210 Cool Springs Rd
Cleveland NC 270139438
Physical Address:
Facility Status:
0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 48' 17" Longitude: 80'39'38"
From intersection of Cool Springs Rd. (SR 1003) and Foster Rd. (SR 1972), travel approximatfey 1 114 mi. north on Foster Rd.
Farm on left. .
Question Areas:
Certified Operator: Shelbia C Foster Operator Certification Number: 20945
Secondary OIC(s):
Onsite Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Shelbia C. Foster Phone : [phone]
On-site representative Shelbia C. Foster Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: ,lames
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary.
Permit to be rescinded according to recently revised closure requirements.
jb
Phone: 704-66;-1699 Exl
Date:JA�L6
page: 1

Permit: AWI800025 Owner - Facility: Shelbia C Foster Facility Number: 800025
Inspection Date: 03/26/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 0 0
Total Design Capacity: 0
Total SSLW: 0
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond FOSTER ROAD 18.00 48.00
page: 2

Type of Visit: 15 Compliance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance j
Reason for Visit: ($`Routine -0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access I
t LIN
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: .95 Depart re Time: bounty:_ Region:
Farm Name: "_�% Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
_ Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
r
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Q] NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
0 Yes [—]No ❑ NA NE
214/2011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Analication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. [] Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift []Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
c
NE
NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No-
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps [] Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather od(
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Sury y
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
i
NE
Page 2 of 3
2/412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Insuection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[] No
[] NA
NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
[]Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
E] NA
❑ E
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
[] NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2011

„kq
FaciiitywNumbelr ®; O ls, ” �,
'C"�►
.+rr, -, �
❑ NE
Division of Soil and�WWFfCbnservation �� x a
'�S'aS''
� x • y = G fir, -
�'.'.�1 �F
'?�..: -
�•"
� '.. x �. .,- r � 1 ir'"`. t l cL . s ^" w '3' t 4F -
ec r a ,�:' ,�� "
O`.Other.'�A �'
;kV
�f
1. �7 -. t } x
❑ NE
. enc .1. a�,
Fype of Visit: S Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
ieaSOn for Visit: * Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ob/i Arrival Time: 03t - Departure Time: County: �` - �-- Region:
Farm Name: L d� T Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: �¢
Certified Operator: _ -- �l Certification Number �Q 1
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
,,a £-•'rrs-...W
„ Design .� Cuent ti;. x Y ` ;Design _ Current �i�,Y DesignCurrenf x
Swine ` KCapac�ty t'op Wet Foultry Capacity Pop CattleCapacity�+ Fo
WFeeder
YFinish,a~-
�� Layer �, Dai Cow
Feeder Non -La er Dai Calf
,.
Finish f r * Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean ` Y = k t* Desi n ,Current � D Cow
.,�r.k as dlF ` ya.,3S t o:-yg �s x�.
r. Farrow to Feeder D :Po "it Ca aei � o ti ' Non -Dairy
ar' i
=Y Farrow to Finish La ers Beef Stocker
Gilts , n Non -La ers Beef Feeder
Boars '° Pullets ,,-I1 Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys _. i w.kr•=3 }:
i�� T f i .1 W h •1'. 1
her Turkey Poults
Idth
erx Other
.N';':.k :... �, ._. ...�. .'y:'.s.. ..P.. ._ . y., .r. :., ,.. r. x�'•�. .. k.y�• _-3h"' bt� �'n'.��Ga.
�• .ti 4 izs yt 4
Discharzes and Stream Imuacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
JtLgo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes
NA
[_]NE
2. [s there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑Yes
e0N
❑ NA
❑NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[] Ye
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & ,Treatment
4. Is storage cap acity,'(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑'' No ❑ NE
St ture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: r
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in);
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? V5
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environtmelr al threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Er �50 A ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any re
maintenance or improvement?
ves
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window �videVe of Zind Drift ❑ Application Outside of �pproved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ZoNA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate, acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equi m ? Y s o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yeso NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [] Yes �]0 0 NA E] NE
the appropriate box.
. ❑ WUP C1 Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate
�box
xbbelow. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ W j;p� —eefCty Freeboard ❑ Waste Ana ysil s Waste Transfers Bather Code
❑ LJ Stacking ❑ Crap.el'c� �J I20 Minute Inspections ly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fait to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued
'*

acili Number:- Date of Inspection:
.4 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA
❑ NE.
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check E] Yes ❑ ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes�10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 0 NA
❑ Yes �0 NA
❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA
❑ Yeso NA
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to qu`estton #). Explain any YES'answers »nd/or airy additional'recommendations or'Any other„eomnnents },�; ,�"a
Use drawiin s,of,faciii to•better`ex lain 'situations use addltl6nal� a es as. necessa � d
g ty { g" ry}.:
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
2/412011

Type of Visit: 'V Compliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U 'Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 6 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency O Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: l Arrival Time: 3: De arture Time: � County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: J
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
yid M 1' ti 1 - •i..• ..? K `,. - t
Design ;Currents ' Design Current s Design Curent"`'
Swine t :Capacity Pop Y `Wet Poul#ry Capacity' Pop. Cattle Capacity
�.
Wean to Finish Laver
F.
Wean to Feeder
11
INon-Layer
Feeder to FinishAr';
°E
Farrow to WeanDesjgn.,'Cukrent
Turke Poults
k
Dry.-Youltry Ca aci Po
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Other'
Gilts
Non -Layers
Boars
Pullets
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
V t��
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No Y❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes. ; ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/412011 Continued
a
. ,I
Turkeys
ti;r ..,_
> _Other'
Turke Poults
`' f
Other
Other'
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
V t��
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No Y❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes. ; ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/412011 Continued
a
. ,I

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
4
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �o NA ] NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes . [—]No NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [] Yes �io ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of,the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? !
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
❑ Yes
[] No �5NA
❑ NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes"'t�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
jiNo
❑ NE
Waste Aoplication
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Ye No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of W' d Drift ❑ Application 0 tside of Approved Area
p`
(�%)_Jdkt612. �
Crop Type(s): FF
_7
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
f!�Wo ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
t1V 0 NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[] No �5NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
jiNo
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �-Nv- ❑ NA ❑ NE
aps Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping ne;Zeekly
vement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
[este Application Freeboard ❑waste Analysis ❑ So� a ysis ❑ W ansfers ❑ Weather de
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yesa M NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑No ]�Z❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/412011 Continued

W acility.Number: - -� Date of Inspection: _
1 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Y�6No�NA❑ NE
25. Is the facilityout of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If es chec� Yes No A NE
p p $ yes, ❑ ❑ � ❑
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes! JNQJo ID N E] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? []Yes C]No SIA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility ail to properly dispose of dead anima with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher t an normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative inunediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emeigencv si_ns as required by the ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -app kation)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ISITo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes. Ifo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yea fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments' refer.to' uesttod# :'Ex laih any YES answers'and/or any additional recdmimeridations°or any other comridents
Usedrawings of facility to :better explain situations (use additional pages as. necessal
i JS
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2011

F
11 6 Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservad
"" 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Aff Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: t2'4 -(T Departure Time: County: AMe Region:
Ld1_ o�
Farm Name: _ _ Y C1P 0sa� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: C l T Operator Certification Number.
Back-up Operator: _- Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =0 =1 0 Longitude: ❑ ° "
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non-Layel
Dry Poultry
Non -L;
Pullets
Poults
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operations?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity -,Population'
ai Caw
❑
Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ -Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: L
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ElNE
El Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes- ❑ A ❑ NE
❑ Yes,
❑ NA El NE
11 Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection_
0 este Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structur 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
�r
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ YesElNE
ElNA Yes ❑ NE
Structure 5 „ Structure 6
❑ Yes _�5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Cl Yes R<.,O ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered ves, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen 1 threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yeso [INA ElNE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑ NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 4,
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA El
maintenance or improvement? V
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? C
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes >FO
[:1NA ❑ NE
ElExcessive Ponding ElHydraulic Overload ElFrozen Ground [:1Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crap Window ❑ Evidence of Wi id Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) �C1
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from thoke designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design -or wettable acre detennination?❑ Yes ❑ No�RnA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
�o
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date:
12/28104 Continued
1�

i Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection 0
F9.gDid
uired Records &Duments
the facility fail tochavc
Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box.
❑ hecklists ❑Design El Maps _b Other
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below—
LJ Yes; o ❑ NA
❑ NE
aste Application l2'Weekly Freeboard,�ETWaste Analysis oil Analysis aste Transfers .0 -Annual Certification
Rainfall ❑ ocking rop Yield inute Inspections onthly and 1"
Rain Inspections �] Weather
Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Y6 *No ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No'jh9A
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes -A�io ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No �A
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes �;<[:INA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ No �A-
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yeso ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
t
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes io ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of s required by
❑ Yes "C1'o ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:"
V
�
�1
L_
FW1
12/28/04

Divtston of Water Quabty
Facility Number Opwtston of Sol l and Water Conservation
O.Other Agency
Type of Visit .0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 37'0V* 11 Departure Thne: c' `-$ .County: _ Region: "
Farm Name: �� 1 _ _ _ Owner Email w
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: —•
Operator Certification Number: ~
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0
❑ _ Longitude: =0=1 °❑
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population T Cattle
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
Mu:rkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cavacty Po�
Cow
E]Yairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑.Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the.State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Ye�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NE
❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes,:..��o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes-Uze❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No �0 NA ❑ NE
tructurrj II Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: y�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats qthentegrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes )��oElNA [INE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? El Yes�Qo ❑ NA [INE
8. Do any of.the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste managements other than the waste struc equtre ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence o Wind Drift ❑ Application Outi$ de of Area
ko)12. Croptype(s) e' ... ... -_.. ---��1 _._- i�
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ YesIK
ElNA ElNE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes R
NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes >❑ NA [INE
Cn meats (refer,to questions#):; Eaplaln any _YES41 savers and/or any recommeodatIans`or any"other
' a t'. - - a w- �1x '�s� i�����'. �,.gix
�i1e draw�ngs^oifacility tosbettei explain situattons {use addihonal+pages a"s necessary} . £ y g.
L7/1 8 Q
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

r.
11 Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? El Yes N ❑ NA El
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readilyavailable? if es ck ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ YesNJQ2o ❑ NA ❑ NE
aste Applicationeekly Freeboard—�aste Analysis Analysis a ransfers ❑ 6wm Certification
anfall ocking op Yield EJJ,2-6 mute Inspections onthly and 1" Rain Inspections eathcr Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ Noi ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yesz< o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No J�SW ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes q "zo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No' ❑ NE
Other Issues
t-� V/
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes,4�5o
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead a ' s within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes �59
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern`?
❑ Yes �10
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency.situations as required by
❑ Yes' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑
❑
❑
32.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
Yes�'1�
A
NE
33.
Does facility require afollow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Ye o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
t-� V/
12/28/04

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800O25. Facility Status: Active Permit. AWI8CCC25 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comcliance Irscection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RQWtine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 09/2212010 Entry Time:03:00 PM Exit Time: 04 30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: La -Foster Farm (Foster Road) Owner Email:
Owner: Gerald M Foster Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 13210 Cool 5 rings Rd Cleveland NC 270139438 _—
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°48'17" Longitude: 80°39'38"
From intersection of Cooi Springs Rd. (SR 1003) and Foster Rd. (SR 1972), travel approximatley 1 114 mi. north on Foster Rd. Farm
on left. .
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Sheibia C Foster Operator Certification Number: 20945
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Gerald M. Foster Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Gerald M. Foster Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Salle
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
05/17/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.48 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01115103 > Waste Analysis > N = 9.0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/20/08 > Soil Analysis
C.
Phone: [phone]
!2"
Date: ��10
Page. 1

Permit: AWI800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster IFacility Number : $00025
Inspection Date: 0912212010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routire '
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 0 0
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Waste Structures
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond FOSTER ROAD 18.00 42.00
Page 2

Permit: AW1800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800025
Inspection Date: 09/22/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
rl
■
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
f-1
1-1
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Cl
0011
c Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
Q
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
n
3 Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
C1
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
Cl
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
rl
5 Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
Cl
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0
■
n
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Q
■
Cl
0
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
MOO
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
0
Cl
improvement?
11, is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? fl
Hydraulic Overload? ri
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AW1800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster
Inspection Date: 09/2212010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 800025
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA N5
PAN?
D
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
D
Total P205?
D
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
Q
Crop Type 1
Corn
(Silage)
Crop Type 2
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
SoR Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
D
■
D D
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
D
■
D
16. Did the facility fad to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? D
Cl
■ D
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
D
■
D D
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
D
■
D D
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D
■
D Cl
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
D
■
Cl D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page 4

P
N
Permit: AW1800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800025
Inspection Date: 09/22/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: outine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? I_l
21. aces record keeping need improvement? n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box beiow.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
El
■
0
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0 ■ n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page:5

Permit: AWI800025 Owner • Facility: Gerale M Foster Facility Number: 800425
Inspection Date: 0912212010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Other Issues
31 Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ f] n
32. Did ReviewerInspector fail to discuss review/inspection witr on-site representative? Q ■ 0 ❑
33- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0000
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
F- Division of Soil and Water Conservation
f
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800025 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW1800025 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: CQmpl nce-ln.,ectivn _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:.
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 02120/2009 Entry Time:03:30 PM Exit Time: 04:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: La -Foster Farm (Foster Road) Owner Email:
Owner: Gerald M Foster Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 13210 Cool Sarings Rd Cleveland NC 270139438
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant n Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: 35°48'17" Longitude: 80°39'38"
From intersection of Cool Springs Rd. (SR 1003) and Foster Rd. (SR 1972), travel approximatley 1 114 mi. north on Foster Rd. Farm
on left. .
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Shelbia C Foster
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 20945
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Gerald M. Foster Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Gerald M. Foster Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: [phone]
Ext. -21 2 ^
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
05/17/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.48 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/15/03 > Waste Analysis > N = 9.0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/20/08 > Soil Analysis
C.
Page: 1

Permit: AWI800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800025
Inspection Date: 02/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle -Milk Cow 0 0
Total Design Capacity: 0
Total SSLW: 0
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond FOSTER ROAD 1800 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AW1800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster
Inspection Date: 02/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 800025
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impact s
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
D
■
D
D
Discharge originated at:
D
D
discharge?
Structure
D
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
Application Field
n
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
D
Other
D
D
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
D
D
■
D
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
D
D
■
D
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
D
D
■
D
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
D
■
D
D
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
D
■
D
D
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
D
■
D
D
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large trees, severe
D
■
D
D
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
D
D
or closure plan?
T Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
D
■
D
D
8. Do any of the structures Zack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
■
D
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
D
■
D
D
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
D
■
D
D
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
ID
■
D
D
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
D
Hydraulic Overload?
D
Frozen Ground? D
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? D
Page: 3

Permit: AW1800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800025
Inspection Date: 02/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? n
Total P205? n
Failure to incorporate manurelsiudge into bare soil? n
Outside of acceptable crop window? n
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? n
Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage)
T 2 Soybean, Wheat
Crop ype
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management .
[)
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
Cl
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
n
Page: 4

Permit: AVVI800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster
Facility Number : 800025
Inspection Date: 02/2C)/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement.
n■nn
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Appiication?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDSS only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fai# to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PIAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
.....
Vo
WJ
HA
IJP
26. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWi D ■ I] rl
29. Did the facility fai? to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0 ■ D rl
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air it ■ n 0
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AW1800025 Owner - facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800025
Inspection Date: 02/2012009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? n ■ !1 rl
32. Did Reviewer/ Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? n ■ o o
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n■nn
Page: 6
M

��-,yJ � a �D
T .� � �� gyp. .
qjbta )Q-A
boa- 4-t> -Wz f.6
a bt>,g aAXL- Ul�
"UL -k Ibr-L7
�� aid
6LAJ;Z&
I') E, C E 0 V IE
P
ILI OCT 6 2010

w A
January 23, 2009
Gerald Foster
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)
13210 Cool Springs Road
Cleveland, NC 27013
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
n
JAN 2 7 2009
Subject: Permit No. AW1800025
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)
Animal Waste Management System
Rowan County
Dear Gerald Foster:
In accordance with your January 13, 2009 permit modification request, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Permit issued to Gerald Foster authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system. You had requested to drop the animal population at this facility to zero until such time as the
waste storage lagoon at this facility is properly closed, as you no longer wished to maintain it as an active
cattle farm.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste structures on the Gerald Foster Farm, with an annual capacity of no greater than an
annual average of 0 dairy cattle.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2013 and replaces the COC
No. AWC800025 issued to this facility on October 1, 2004. You are authorized and required to operate
the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the Permit. An adequate
system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in number of animals authorized by this Permit (as provided
above) will require a CAWMP and a modification to this Permit and must be completed prior to actual
increase in number of animals.
Please carefully read this Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting.
The issuance of this Permit does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all
applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, or federal) nor convey any property rights
in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T. 0111(c), a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards, a I00 -ft separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatergualAy.ore Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
�"`
NCaroiina
'Vaturalk
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this Permit may result in
revocation of this Permit or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C, the
TCleii Wafer Act,'ifid`�40 CFR 122.41, including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Ir') 1J 0 ql -,, :] i,
If you wish to continuertl7e activity permitted under this Permit after the expiration date of this Permit, an
application, for renewal' must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
.JW) I'L. 1, 1
LThis Permit is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
Piol the' Division prio to 1 name change or change in ownership:
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. if you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (Record -Keeping Forms Package)
cc: Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS070047

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INDIVIDUAL CATTLE ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Gerald Foster
Rowan County
FOR THE
continued operation and maintenance of an animal waste management system for the Gerald Foster Farm
(Facility), located in Rowan County, consisting of 0 (zero) milking cows and the application to land as
specified in the Facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
following specified conditions and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The animal waste management system operated under this Permit shall be effectively
maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of pollutants
to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of waste to terraces and grassed
waterways is acceptable as long as it is applied in accordance with Natural Resources
Conservation Service (MRCS) Standards and does not result in a discharge of waste to
surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. If the Facility has a discharge of waste that reaches
surface waters or wetlands resulting from a storm event more severe than a 25 -year, 24-
hour storm, it will not be considered to be in violation of this Permit, as long as the
Facility is in compliance with its CAWMP and this Permit.
2. No discharge of waste shall result in a violation of the water quality standards established
for receiving waters as per Title 15A, Subchapter 2B, Section .0200 of the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the NCAC.
3. The facility's CAWMP is hereby incorporated by reference into this Permit. The
CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and standards
(federal, state and local) in effect at the time of siting, design, and certification of the
Facility.
4. Any proposed increase or modification to the annual average that exceeds the thresholds
set by North Carolina General Statues (NCGS) 143-215.1013(1),will require a
modification to the CAWMP and the Permit prior to modification of the Facility.

Animal waste shall not be applied within one hundred (100) feet of any well, with the
exception of monitoring wells. The allowable distance to monitoring wells shall be
established on a case-by-case basis by the Division.
H. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application equipment and
fields shall be properly operated properly and maintained at all times.
2. A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the facility's CAWMP on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste shall be
applied upon areas not included in the CAWMP.
3. Soil pH on all land application fields must be maintained in the optimum range for crop
production.
4. Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the receiving
crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff
during any given application event.
If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled, bare soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land. This
requirement does not apply to no -till fields, pastures, or fields where crops are actively
growing.
6. Pesticides, toxic chemicals, and petroleum products shall not be disposed of in the animal
waste management system.
7. Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be
discharged into the animal waste management system. Washdown of stock trailers
owned by and used to transport animals to and from the Facility only will be permissible
as long as the system has been evaluated and approved to accommodate the additional
volume. Only those cleaning agents and soaps that are EPA -approved according to their
labels, will not harm the cover crop, and will not. contravene the groundwater standards
listed in 15A NCAC 21, may be utilized in the Facility covered by this Permit.
Instruction labels are to be followed when using cleaning agents and soaps.
8. Disposal of dead animals resulting from normal mortality rates associated with the
Facility shall be done in accordance with the Facility's CAWMP and the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary Division's
statutes and regulations.
9. Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the waste
lagoons/storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the
structures.

10. A protective, vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen
lagoon/storage pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping
elevation), berms, pipe runs, and diversions to surface waters or wetlands. Trees, shrubs,
and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/storage pond
embankments. All trees shall be removed in accordance with good engineering practices.
Lagoon/storage pond areas shall be accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
11. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed
in accordance with the CAWMP. When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary,
provisions must be taken to prevent damage to the lagoon dikes and liner.
12. Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to,
tires, bottles, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste.
13. The Facility must have at least one of the following.items at all times: (a) adequate
animal waste application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other written agreement,
for the use of the necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a third party applicator
capable of providing adequate waste application.
14.. No waste shall be applied in wind conditions that might reasonably be expected to cause
the mist to reach surface waters or wetlands.
15, The Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as specified in the
Facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage areas, and land application areas.
16. Waste shall not be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen, or snow
covered at the time of land application.
17. Land application of waste is prohibited during precipitation events. The Permittee shall
consider pending weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste.
18. Land application activities shall cease on any application site that exceeds a Mehlich 3
Soil Test Index for Copper of greater than 3,000 (108 pounds per acre) or Zinc of greater
than 3,000 (213 pounds per acre).
19. Any major structural repairs to lagoons/storage ponds must have written documentation
from a technical specialist certifying proper design and installation. However, if a piece
of equipment is being replaced with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications,
no technical specialist approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the
gallons per minute (gpm) capacity is not being increased or decreased), etc.] unless the
replacement involves disturbing the lagoon/storage pond embankment.
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
An inspection of the animal waste collection, treatment, and storage structures, and
runoff control measures shall be conducted and documented at a frequency to insure
proper operation For example, lagoons/storage ponds, and other structures should be
inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or discharge.

2. Highly visible waste -level gauges shall be maintained to mark the level of waste in each
lagoon/storage pond that does not gravity feed through a free flowing transfer pipe into a
subsequent structure. The gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings. The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded
weekly on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, phosphorus, copper, and
zinc, shall be conducted on each application field receiving animal waste at least every
three (3) years. An analysis of the animal ,waste shall be conducted in accordance with
recommended laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application. .
This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc
Phosphorus Copper
The Permittee shall record all irrigation and land application event(s) including hydraulic
loading rates, nutrient loading rates and cropping information. The Permittee shall also
record removal of solids and document nutrient loading rates if disposed on-site or record
the off-site location(s). These records must be on forms supplied by, or approved by, the
Division.
If, for any reason, there is a discharge from the animal waste management system
(including the land application sites), to surface waters or wetlands, the Permittee is
required to make notification in accordance with Condition III. 9. The discharge
notification shall include the following information:
a. Description of the discharge: A description of the discharge including an estimate of
the volume discharged, a description of the flow path to the receiving surface waters
or wetlands and a site sketch showing the path of the waste. Also, an estimation of
the volume discharged.
b. Time of the discharge: The length,of time of the discharge, including the exact dates
and times that it started and stopped, and if not stopped, the anticipated time the
discharge is expected to continue.
c. Cause of the discharge: A detailed statement of the cause of the discharge. If caused
by a precipitation event, detailed information from the on-site rain gauge concerning
the inches and duration of the precipitation event.
d. All steps being taken to reduce, stop and cleanup the discharge. All steps to be taken
to prevent future discharges from the same cause.
e. Analysis of the waste: A copy of the last waste analysis conducted as required by
Condition III. 3.
A copy of this Permit, the Facility's COC, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, the CAWMP, and copies of all records required by this Permit and the
Facility's CAWMP shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three (3) years.

7. Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the request from the Division, the
Permittee shall provide to the Division one (1) copy of all requested information and
reports related to the operation of the animal waste management system. Once received
by the Division, all such information and reports become public information, unless they
constitute confidential information under North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS) 132-
1.2, and shall be made available to the public by the Division as specified in Chapter 132
of the NCGS.
8. The Division may require any additional monitoring and reporting (including but not
limited to groundwater, surface water or wetland, waste, sludge, soil, lagoon/storage pond
levels and plant tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of
such waste upon the surface waters, groundwaters or wetlands. Such monitoring,
including its scope, frequency, duration and any sampling, testing, and reporting systems,
shall meet all applicable Division requirements.
9. Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events:
a. Any discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands.
b. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or
equal to that required in Condition V. 2, of this Permit.
C. Over applying waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or
where runoff enters surface waters or wetlands.
d. failure of any component of the animal waste management system resulting in a
discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
Any failure of the animal waste management system that renders the Facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the waste and/or sludge.
f. Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat
to the environment or human safety or health.
For any emergency, which requires immediate reporting after normal business hours,
contact must be made with the Division of Emergency Management at 1-800-858-0368.
The Permittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate Division Regional Office
within five (5) calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report
shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to
ensure that the problem does not recur. The requirement to file a written report may not
be waived by the Division Regional Office.

IV. INSPECTIONS AND ENTRY
The Permittee shall allow any' authorized representative of Department, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law and in
accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity measures, to:
a. Enter the Permittee's premises where the regulated Facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this Permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this Permit;
Inspect, at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and
control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this Permit;
and,
d. Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit
compliance, any substances or parameters at any location.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
The issuance of this Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
compliance with all applicable surface water, wetlands, groundwater and air quality
standards or for damages to surface waters, wetlands or groundwaters resulting from the
animal.operation.
2. The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
Facility's CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds
must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain a 25 -year, 24-hour
storm event plus an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall
be no violation of this condition if. (a) there is a storm event more severe than a 25 -year,
24-hour event, (b) the Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (c) there is at
least one (1) foot of structural freeboard.
Any containment basin, such as a lagoon or a storage pond, used for waste management
shall continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of this Permit until
properly closed. When the containment basin is properly closed in accordance with the
Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) North Carolina Standard for Closure of
Waste Impoundments, February 2005 or any subsequent amendment, the containment
basin shall not be subject to the requirements of this Permit. The Permittee must submit a
letter to the Division to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of
closure of all containment basins.
Closure shall also include a minimum of 24 hours pre -notification of the Division and
submittal of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to the
address identified on the form within fifteen (15) days of completion of closure.

4. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
agreements, which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation
of its COC to operate under this Permit.
This Permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the Facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a Notification of Change of
Ownership form must be submitted to the Division, including documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials as may be appropriate.
The issuance of this Permit does not prohibit the Division from reopening and modifying
the Permit, revoking and reissuing the Permit, or terminating the Permit as allowed by the
appropriate laws, rules, and regulations.
The Groundwater Compliance Boundary is established by 15A NCAC 2L and 15A
NCAC 02T .0111{c). An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the Division
in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under the NCGS.
VI. PENALTIES
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this Permit; the Facility's
CAWMP; and/or applicable state law; may subject the Permittee to an enforcement
action by the Division including but not limited to the modification of the animal waste
management system, civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this Permit. Any Permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of state law and is grounds for enforcement action;
for Permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of
Permit coverage renewal application.
It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an enforcement action to claim that it would
have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain
compliance with the conditions of this Permit.
This Permit issued the 23`d day of January, 2009.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
for Coleen H. Sullins, Director
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AWI800025

Re: 80-25
Subject: Re: 80-25
From: James Bealle <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:12:28 -0500
To: [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail]
J.R.,
No issues. Thanks for your assistance on this...
jb
J. R. Joshi wrote:
James,
1 have received a request to get the'zero population' permit for the Gerald Foster farm. As we
discussed before, this permit is issued to the facilities that have no animals but have not closed their
lagoon or storage pond properly. This allows them to skip the annual fees. We issue them an
'individual' permit in this case. They are still responsible for maintaining the lagoon or storage pond
and other permit conditions that will be included as part of the permit.
I will go ahead with the processing of this permit unless you have any issues to resolve before
finalize the individual permit. Please send me an email to this effect. Thanks.
James Bealle <Lames.bealle(a),ncmail.net>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
I of 1 1/22/2009 11:13 PM

0 Division of Water Quality
F-1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800025 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWCB 0025 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qompliance InsQectior Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine. County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 09118/2008 Entry Time -03:30 PM Exit Time: 04.30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: La -Foster arm (Foster Road) Owner Email:
Owner: Gerald M Foster
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 13210 Cool Sorinas Rd Cleveland NC 270139438
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°48'17" Longitude: 80°3938"
From intersection of Cool Springs Rd. (SR 1003) and Foster Rd. (SR 1972), travel approximatley 1 1/4 mi. north on Foster Rd. Farm
on left. .
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Shelbia C Foster
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s)
24 hour contact name
On-site representative
Name
Gerald M. Foster
Gerald M. Foster
Operator Certification Number: 20945
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: [phone]
Ext.2
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary p ector(s) Ins :
Inspection Summary:
05/17/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.48 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/15/03 > Waste Analysis > N = 9.0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/20/08 > Soil Analysis
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shall
be mowed regularly,
21. Weather Code must be recorded on the designated form (enclosed), or approved alternative form.
ib
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800025
Inspection Date: 09/18/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 200 T 0
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
to Pond I CARSON RD I 1 1 18,001 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Faster Facility Number : 800025
Inspection Date: 09118!2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
App3ication Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. floes discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
o
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3, Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6, Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
n
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster
Inspection Date: 09/1812008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 800025
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
n
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
r
n
Total P205?
r
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
f1
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 1
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3 .
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n ■ n n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■ n n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n ❑ e n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n e n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■ n n
Yes No NA NE
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■ n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
n
WUP?
Page: 4

Permit: AVVC600025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800025
Inspection Date: 09118/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ n n rl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
171
Weather code?
■
Weekly Freeboard?
r
-transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfali & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
rn
■ n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n ■ n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■ n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
fl
n ■ o
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ n n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n ® n
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
B n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■ n n
Quality representative immediately,
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800025 Owner - Facility: Geraid M Foster
Facility Number: 800025
Inspection Date: 09/18/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
nfl a Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fait to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 ■ [I 0
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 0 n 0
33. Does facility require a follow -exp visit by same agency? Q ■ ❑ D
Page: 6

19
• Division of Water Quality
i
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 800,025 _ Facility Status: Active_ Permit: AWC800025 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance ln�pection _ _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region:
Date of Visit: 0311 I(�?007 Entry Time:03:00 PM Exit Time: 04:30 eM Incident #:
Farm Name: La -Foster Firm (Foster RoadL Owner Email:
Owner: Gerald M Fostgr ' Phone: 7Qa-278-2596
Mailing Address. 13210 Cool Springs Rd Cleveland NC 270139438
Physical Address:
Facility Status: N Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 33348'25" � — Longitude: {}0'39'45"
From intersection of Cool Springs Rd. (SR 1003) and Foster Rd. (SR 1972), travel approximatley 1 114 mi. north on Foster Rd. Farm
on left. .
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Caliection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Shelbia C Fcster Operator Certification Number: 20945
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Gerald M, Foster Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Gerald M. Foster Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: C7•`�7?3S',t61
Inspector Signature: Date: gjJ-K tjI62'7
Secondary Inspector(s).
Inspection Summary:
05/17/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.48 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/15/03 > Waste Analysis > N = 9,0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
10/03/06 > Soil Analysis
Jb
Page: 1

n
Permit: AWC800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800025
i
Inspection Date: 0311 612 00 7 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 200 0
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
rite Pond CARSON RD 18.00 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800025
3
Inspection Date: 03116/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ Cl n
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ D
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) D ❑ ■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
Excessive Ponding?
fl
Hydraulic Overload?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any pari of the operation?
n
000
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity fess than adequate?
0
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
rl
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
D
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
000
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
& Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
f_1
000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0
■
0
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
D
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
D
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
fl
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

r
Permit: AWC800025 Owner -Facility: Gerald M Foster
Facility Number: 800025
Inspection Date: 0311612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Soil Type 5
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑
■
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

' Permit: AVVC800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800025
Inspection Date: 0 311 6/2 00 7 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
In
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
In
Stocking?
In
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
in
■
o
o
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
o
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
o
n
29- Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Page: 6
Permit: AWC800025 Owner- Facility: Gerald M Foster
Facility Number:
800025
Inspection Date: 0311612007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
n ■
n
❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
❑ ■
Q
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
in ■
❑
❑
Page: 6

CALIBRATING LIQUID MANURE SPREADERS USING THE LOAD -AREA 1vt
1. Determine the capacity of the manure spreader.
a./'' O gallons
2. Spread at least one full load using the regular spreading patterns of the applicator.
Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
LOAD -AREA METHOD
SPREADER SYSTEM
n. Application rate N lbs/acre
(I x manure P205 lbs/acre
analysis number _-
1000) K 2 0 lbs/acre
6. If the application rate is not acceptable, repeat the procedure at different spreader settings, speeds (Item 2),
or both, until the desired application rate is achieved.
' 1 � � � .r` -..f wry «• � -----
Va AR 2 1 2007
Iva
b. Forward speed, gear, or
"-,I_J
throttle setting
;:.d
c. PTO speed or setung
d. Spreader gate setting
_lr4ii,
a
3. Measure the area of spread.
e. Spread area width
T . '
ft
f. Spread area length
,� �'
ft
g. Spread area (e X f}
=
ft,
In. Spread area (g - 43,560)
'"'-''
acre
4. Compute the manure application
rate.
i. Number of loads spread
i.
Capacity per load (a)
gallons
;11
k. Total manure spread (i x j)
gallons
1
1. Application rate (k _ h)
gal/acre
1`
5. Compute the nutrient application rate.
m. Manure analysis N
lbs/1000 gallons
P20,
lbs/1000 gallons
K 2 0
tbs/1000 gallons
n. Application rate N lbs/acre
(I x manure P205 lbs/acre
analysis number _-
1000) K 2 0 lbs/acre
6. If the application rate is not acceptable, repeat the procedure at different spreader settings, speeds (Item 2),
or both, until the desired application rate is achieved.
' 1 � � � .r` -..f wry «• � -----
Va AR 2 1 2007
Iva

WAr�9QG.
K
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Gerald M. Foster
La -Foster Fane (Foster Road)
13210 Cool Springs Road
Cleveland, NC 27013
Dear Mr. Foster:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W, Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
September 18, 2006
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2006-PC-0404
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)/Facility 80-25
General Permit AWC800025
Rowan County
Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes authorizes and directs the Environmental
Management Commission of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to protect and preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of
Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control regulations. This
letter is a standard notification and is- intended to advise you of the legal requirements associated'
with the operation of your Facility.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted
on August 23, 2006, by James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist/DWQ. During the
inspection, the following violation(s) were identified:
• Facility Operator failed to conduct the required Annual Soil Analysis. The most recent
available results were dated August 11, 2004, This is a violation of General Permit
Condition I1I.4, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Please submit a written response to the Division of Water Quality by September 30, 2006;
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted violation(s), and prevent recurrence in the future.
In responding, please reference the Facility and NOV Number. Address your comments to the
attention of Mr. Bealle at the address located on the bottom of this page.
o"
Division of Water Quality I Aquifer Protection Section I Mooresville Regional Office Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] NthCaroJinn
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 Internet: www.ncwateraualitv.orgllE![C!i!a!r/

La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)/Facility 80-25
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
September 18, 2006
Page 2
Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions as appropriate to regain compliance. The North Carolina General Statutes
provide for the assessment of civil penalties of up to Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000)
per day, per violation for noncompliance; and/or criminal penalties.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Bealle at [phone].
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosures
cc: North Carolina Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Files
Regional Files
.lh

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency I --I
Facility Number: 800025 Facility Status: Active__ , , Permit: AWC800025 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comgjjaoo jnsoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan -Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 08/23/2006 Entry Time:0130 PM Exit Time: 0&30 PM
Farm Name: La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)
Owner: Gerald M Foster
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 13210 Cool Springs Rd Cleveland NC 270139438
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 33'48'25" Longitude: 80"39'45"
From intersection of Cool Springs Rd. (SR 1003) and Foster Rd. (SR 1972), travel approximatley 1 114 mi. north on Foster Rd. Farm
on left..
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
© Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other issues
Certified Operator: Shelbia C Foster Operator Certification Number: 20945
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Gerald M. Foster Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Gerald M. Foster Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector. James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
�� iB
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AVVC800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800025
Inspection Date: 08123/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
05/17/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.48 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/15/03 > Waste Analysis > N = 9.0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
08/11/04 > Soil Analysis
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shallF
be mowed regularly. ,
21. Failure to conduct Annual Soil Analysis; NOV to follow. Stocking records maintained, but must use the designated form (enclosed).
24, Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in October, 2006.
Facility is currently in the process of closure.
jb
Page: 2

ti Permit: AWC800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800025
Inspection Date: 08/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle -Milk Cow 200 16
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Faste Pond
CARSON RD
18.44
:4:8:00]
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800025
Inspection Date: 08/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
0000
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3, Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE''
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural Freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑ '
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
000
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster
Facility Number: 800025
r
Inspection date: 08/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10°1x110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)"
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Soybeans
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800025 Owner. Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800025
Inspection Data: 08/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ 000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
■
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
■
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ 000
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■ 000
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
■
❑
Other {ssues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Pen -nit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29. Did.the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

9
Permit: AWC800025 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster
Inspection Date: 08/2312006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number., 800025
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑
■
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page! 7

o� 1
-J-t� e-;,� -tom UA�
fin- as
�p-y-s
c IE 9 w
SEP 2 7 M
I DWQ - Aquifar Protection._�

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 1, 2004
Gerald Foster
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)
13210 Cool Springs Road
Cleveland NC 2 3
Subject:
OCT i 2044
14C DEPT OF ER%'T
ANQ HATIjnAL
SVILLE REG'ONALL
CES �pORE O"'CE
Dear Gerald Foster:
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800025
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on January 22, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Gerald
Foster, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC800025 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the La -Foster Farm (Foster Road), located in Rowan County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified
in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate systemm for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please nay careful attention to the record kecping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section —Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o,enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Nne
orthCarolina
Naturallff

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC800025
APS Central Files

y \N q 7' Michael F. Easley, Governor
t avF FRQ William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
tiG G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
rAlan W. Klimek, P.E. Director La
Division of Water Quality
o �
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
July 22, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Gerald Foster
13210 Cool Springs Rd
Cleveland, NC 27013
Subject: Notice of Violation (NOV)
Facility#: 80-25
La -Foster Farm, Site Inspection
Rowan County, NC
Permit# AWC800025
Dear Mr. Foster:
Chapter 143, North Carolina General Statutes, authorizes and directs the Environmental
Management Commission of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources to protect and
preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of Water Quality (division) has the
delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control rules. This letter is a standard notification
and is intended to advise you of the legal requirements under North Carolina law.
Mr. William Burke of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on June 6, 2005.
During the inspection it was noted that you did not have weekly record of freeboard levels.
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.10 (C), this letter is being issued as a Notice
of Violation for the following:
• Failure to maintain a weekly freeboard record that is in compliance with your Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan. At the time of inspection the freeboard records had
not been kept for several months, these records are. required to be kept weekly. This is
a violation of Section I Condition #3 of your General Permit
To correct this violation you must begin keeping weekly freeboard records immediately.
Please submit a written response to this Office by August 7, 2005, indicating the actions taken to
correct the noted violation, and prevent the violation from occurring in the future.
Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement action for these violations. Also be advised that North Carolina General Statutes
provide for civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation per day for noncompliance with state
environmental laws and regulations, and/or criminal penalties.
1VQne Carolina
Division of Water Quality 1 Aquifer Protection Section 1 Mooresville Regional Office Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] aillra$
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 Internet: htto:llaw.ehnr.state.nc.us l

/ La-r'Wer Farm NOV
;W-25 '
Pege 2
July 22, 2005
Please address your response to the attention of Mr. Burke. it is also requested that your
response reference the date and subject of this NOV, as well as the facility number. If you have
any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Burke at (704) 663-
1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
cc: Rowan County SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
File

e
N
G� 47 aoo s
o�aJs
0 a s
AUG ' 1 1n05 10

'4
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time:
Farm Name:
County:
Owner Email:
Region: JMJI
Owner Name: L71 --4e4444 T �ut4fr— Phone:
Mailing Address: j 3 fl Cia� SAC AIIIeq"l G ��,j
V -r -
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 6-c dd �O�`� Title:
Onsite Representative: f
Certified Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: a o q ys
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =0
=i
=As Longitude: = ° = I = «
..
� r
Currenq
® No
gn Current
Capacity Populat on
Wet Poultry
Cpacrty P�opalatn
Cattlecity
MCNI
Populatiop
r1[00__=1W:an
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
antoFinish
❑ La er
❑ Yes
❑ No
® Dai Cow
❑ NE
to Feeder
❑Non -La er
❑ Dai Calf
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Feeder to Finish:`
❑ No
"`
ElDai Heifei
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
a x
ElD Cow
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® No
❑ NA
❑ Non -Dairy
other than from a discharge?
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Co
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
1E1 Other
I
ctures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12/28/04
Continued

y
` Facility Number 4 -- f°Oy Date of Inspection 6'Ah--
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
®No
Structure 6
Identifier: Z QAU­J r -*41'C
Spillway?: o V
Designed Freeboard (in): / g jei
Observed Freeboard (in): i A O'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
D9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
1 l . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) -!5w' 1, .9_1, f
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination:
❑ Yes
[59 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector NameA�'t � �: ` 'Ia RI! _ ., ,,, Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z"S
11/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: cwxf ­Z­*'Jj Date of Inspection - -d
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application $4 Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ® Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
IM NA
❑ NE
[_1 Yes
FKI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
m NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Ec] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[K NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
21 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Rdditionafc6mments and/or Drawings;
!� �'Kv °� %�r s•.+�
ro`iy .F CaC Mort
t�ccort�f
jre�o./r"L—� 7
r��t �r"� C'�e sw ►"�Co N o �Yj 11 N IxA4 y '/ �pg a A7
Y -S4 Fes[ � p�
— re" dna OLr
�v y d../ �ti,�,Oe.
O / /1!�
7�'"`' fiL y65u d► ,
12/28/04

14
jType of Visit ACompiiance Inspection O Operation Review O lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit )D Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other © Denied Access
Facility Number 'late of Visit: Time:
Q Not O erational O Below Threshold
®:Permitted IMCertifieedd — 3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ....... IP,i!r`................................... ......................... ........................... County: .... Qov!!:1':'....................................... .......................
OwnerName:.. -lam/= �f ...... .`! '�...T........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
MailingAddress:..........................................................................................................._........_...............................................................................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: ................................... ....................................................................... Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry $Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• �' �"
Discharges & Stream. I_ mpacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:tR!t!......................T
................................................................................................................................ ......,
Frechoard (inches):
12112103
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number:. -y — rw,? Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure pian?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste AnDlication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ENO
11.
Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
1..� E.,li>�."..1
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12.
Crop type S
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14,
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
R No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
E No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
IN No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes RNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 0 No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes R No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
'-•:. .i . ;I 11..,,,; 9i, '?5i1•"'"1'IP i'iY#!^4-: .i,.-:'7l:I.�ft1 " -, $�:€68°" ,.4u„ 3;-.... 11F ' .,,'4'C't'41 S'.:PfR"t;4r.; �.lF3,#Y i:t..i(ii`., >.Y.k. �.... i;C:..^i,'"„d'n:![•'•,q?."�.Etliii 9rM %y i�',L'd3i....- ', :.EFie, k-.: �ti.d::'i.1SP11. "N`34: i. ',I E 1 _. i. j' EI q
Gamments� (referijp1ta questeon:#)s E plant' atayIcYES,'"p wets€anrUor{{a.�nyj recommendations ananyv er comments P ,, � 6€�@' ,a,,:Ep t'�'EEE , ,EP I T:
.'"'°&fa E. .ia.F"3.Y .TZ,6,.r ,(�1 .1tF':.r'..l ,,b�'.ur.Sf{t!'Fahf F3ui: pe5xuf F3�..i+:E 1E'i.C1Fd:�. ✓SI.�"i,iiki'i'Lida.l��.IS.Y::::HrA%{':w,Si.e5iL.1:5L3.. rykik:.i�..^..:._.,,]1..iA.=;+1.&ik.al.,7i.1..i4(3.sFFEEi�i�i 1€h(�
Use iWWngs1of,factiity.,to;betterfexplain s�d�atroa5.',{ose addrbonal TRW as'necessary) ; ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes ,ia;f .
j� ,596':' ',E . $r
>¢,:1:._..
. Ebyy .�;.€+ f I.e' ,. 9' t t S t§=`�'%.:d , r. P§ G.i .➢ E..¢ q1}4,' €:.`�.j 1 e ., . 3.d¢:� 3.. p 7 .E 6 ,7 ,j��j'r S °,"airy 3�.,M' rr.- q .ry ,,..p. +n1 9 fCP, r�a<},�3I .x�q ,,,l Em�aar,s�(1�,'$t; , j
:t� .F..,. -� ,f �''' f.xj :.i€•{P:.<,.?r'„.:. iry i'¢P:.,..€1�� I �1:. ,#°x,- IFY1K .sti,l,,€,{E6� $. E:.. N?fIsIP:.:SF,?: w;:xEEEl��PiS.»� iSEEIt;€6tFF' Esta.aFU:tii?#6E6t`,F:il,?i1P;2@d'?3d. Ea, a{V.. EE�F I'f€!ISsu,iti�p�rl4iv i.Il'.ciY11. E.H_. P.i1�l i,eEvd Ee,EI&_ .da, s..P9AEtle:`..fayi3?Pailli=
'qDi.v N� R h
�"
ReVlewer/Ins actor Name lwP�lx k�-�I,.,...
1..� E.,li>�."..1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: -ok ^a y
12112103 Continued

Facility Numberzq._�3 _ ,�„yr Date of Inspection
Reauired Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
L
T
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27.
4
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
n No
28.
*2
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
IS No
NPDES1 Permitted Facilities
30.
Is'the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
®No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
're,%i : k
{ : -F1. '.5 t 1 , s , I _ ; ik r '� {inn rrt , Fk"1;{: s s..,, t h i Ali
ddit{onal Comments an'd/or � wings'. :' ggir i • 1 O` t l �L ,, l
aC
b[f:Ki,:.�,t=•IC��,.k.4�i'�r:�'4k�[i11t1.�iF{R.isid�i:�i'��'iti{i.'t�i��1c'�I�•E{�i'F'a1=5E{3kik:.. %I�'F�i}.9tH.t`�Yi;•�fii'.�•.;EFS:.Y.��.�i��ri1i�f.hi',.;li,"wFit'!t!�>Y.:
�a
L
T
12112103

�oF W A 7'F9
QG
Mr. Gerald Foster .
13210 Cool Springs Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Dear Mr. Foster:
Michael F. Easley, overnor
William G. Ross Jr- Secretary,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimck. P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Colcen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
September 25, 2003
Subject: La Foster Dairy, Site Inspection Facility
Certificate of Coverage: AWC800025
Rowan County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on September 24,
2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well maintained, and the records were
complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
"Wrl
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]

r
Division ,Water
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReason for Visit 4 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 110 25 Uate of Visit: r 09/24/2003
Q Not O perational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified O Conditionally Certified 1] Registered pate Last Operated or Abovc'I'hresholti: .._._._......
Farm Name: ...................:......................... County- &.1yan .................................... MQ ........
Owner Name: Gerald.----------------- hQ$ter----------------------------- Phonc No: 194:Z78:1,�45------------- ---------- ---
NfailingAddress: 13210..C.Qo1.5pri.uga.iiud................................................................ QuAAlad.Ac ...................................................... Z7.0.13 ..............
Facility Contact: ...........................................................Title Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Cs>ALDFOS-------------------------•------ Integrator:.------------------------------------------•
Certified Operator:S.helUL.C.............................. F.0atex ................................................ Operator Certification `umber:209 5.............................
Location of Farm:
From intersection of Cool Springs Rd. (SR 1003) and Foster Rd. (SR 1972), travel approximatley 1 114 mi. north on Foster
Rd. Farm on left..
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle 0 Horse Latitude • Longitude ' �•
i5
7
Design Current
Swine Canneity Penulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer®Dairy 200 140
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 200
Total SSLW 280,000
.: Number of Lagoons 1 I❑ Subsurface Drains PresentJI❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/ Solid Traps❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: C]Lagoon E]Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsen ed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaifmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure l Structure 2 Stnrcture 3 Structure 4 Strucwre ; Structure 6
Identifier........................... ........................... ......--•--•-••.......................-•--•-......_............................. ...........................
Freeboard (inches 72

I lFacility Number: xo—Z.{
Date of Inspection 0)124120113
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes OR No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® Nig
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Flay) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13, Do the receiving crops differ with diose designated ut the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan I CAVGWNW )" ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/] spector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance ofthe Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes OR No
❑ Yes ® No
Cl Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this v6it.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field CopN ❑ Final Notes
THE FACILITY APPEARED TO BE WELL MAINTAINED AND THE RECORDS APPEARED TO BE COMPLETE.
�j
Reviewer/Inspector Name Alan Johson

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
2I5.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office: The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. if you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
v
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC800025
NDPU Files
tic DEPS• I
AND NA3URAL RE9WRCE8
j=RESVUE REGIONAL OFFICE
Rr
Y 19 200
DSA
J
r�yT�ppp'

OF W A rFR Michael F. Easley, Governor
s ,
O� pGWilliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary'--,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j r Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Q -C
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Gerald Foster
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)
13210 Cool Springs Road
Cleveland NC 27013
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800025
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
Dear Gerald Foster:
On April 28, 2003, .the North .Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water.Quality (Division)-toextend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on January 22, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Gerald
Foster, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC800025 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the La -Foster Farm (Foster Road), located in Rowan County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified
in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a.modification to the CAWMP and
-this•COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance'of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility. AM
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity 'Action Employer
Internet httpJ1h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Gerald Foster- La- Foster Dairy
Location: 3765 Foster Rd., Cleveland, NC 27013
Telephone: [phone]
.Type Operation: Dairy
Number of Animals: 200
(Design Capacity)
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order. to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to
be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates,
leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons
per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters
which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab
for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

4
tr
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. V, ]tcn
the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and / or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should
be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown.
SevLral factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface «eaters. Wind
coriditiolts should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize
t11e value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the w istc
should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting, llljM612 the WZiStc
ur disking will conserve nutrients and reduCc odor problems.
The acres needed to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this t\p of
facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report [1,0111 your
write 111,111agement facility.
2

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
A 200 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ftp, tons, etc.)
200 animals x 21 (gal/day/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days time) = 1,495,200 gallons of'
waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitroaen_(PAN) Produced Per Year
200 animals x 76 lbs. N/animal/yr = 15,200 lbs. Total N
Total Nitrogen produced/yr. 15,200 lbs. Total N
(PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a bigjob. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:
FOIL APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1
3

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Four waste storage pond is designed for 90 days of temporary storage and the tertlporary
storage must be removed on the average of once every 3 MONTHS. In no instance should tilt
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of
96.5 . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NA RRA TI VE OF OPERA TION:
'[leis operation has 716 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation will be a 2 year
systeni of corn cut for silage in the first year, followed by small grain cut for silage and sudex 11,1\'
in the second year. Nitrogen will be applied using a honeywagon to crops, based on the realistic
yields at the rates listed in table I.
Timing and application rates will be as followed:
Corn silage: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Sill. Grain silage: Sept.- Oct. at flie rate of 120 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days bcfork:
planting.
Sudex hay: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac no more than 30 days before plantinu.
Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Atlg-Nov at the rate of 1 10 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac.
Oil fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 2,5%.
\Paste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon.
tanker or manure spreader. Maintain all waste handling equipment in accordance with
illanufactures specifications. The system should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage
and proper system.
NOTE; The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
4

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
I. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal
discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $30,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
?. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long terns access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste.
If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall
provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/leer the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Ilan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of al]imals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients.
4, Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). Ilan ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
4,reater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where
runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by
DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian
Forest Buffers.]
3. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
Should not be'applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Wer Ther acrd Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]
5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATION
(Continued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no
more than 20 to 25 percent of the leal' area is covered.
10. 1Vaste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be field to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative Enter
strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filier Ships]
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
Wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
, —,ronomic rates in a manner that causes no runol`f o - drift from the site.
16. Donlestic and industrial waste frons washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks. etc.,
S11,111 not be discharged into the alllnlal waste ]ll Lill agetllellt systelll.
I

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(Continued)
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event ill
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
I S. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established oil all disturbed areas
(la4,00n embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
La�,,00n berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence ol' erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
l9. It' animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner- is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closul•epIml" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be 111spected Oil a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept oil site.
11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER:
(Please print)
Signature:..,.., _ T Date: -0 �4_Z, E.
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print)
Affiliation: tYPC 5
Address (Agency):_ Z 72-7-C G (n
Signature:
0
Date: 1-Z g -cc-)

State of North Carolina IT
Department of Environment$ �: or 4 Tk?WA
and Natural Resources NaT a�. "SO" a
Division of Water Quality /
- � DEC 4 20Dd
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
a UBill Holman, Secreta�
NCDENR..
Kerr T. Stevens, Director -VA�EENVI AL RESOURCES
November 29, 2000
Gerald Foster
La -Foster Farm
13210 Cool Springs Road
Cleveland NC 27013
Attn: Gerald Foster
Subject: Application No. AWC800025
Additional Information Request
La -Foster Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Foster:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the
subject application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please
address the following by December 29, 2000:
1. Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) Table l., lists the Yield for Small Grain Silage as 9
tons per acre on a Mecklenburg soil. This is higher than the 10 tons per acre, currently"'"
recommended. Please contact your technical specialist to revise the Waste Utilization
Plan or provide 5 years of on-farm yield records, or a local NRCS/SWCD county yield
table that supports the increased yield as shown in the current WUP. If yield is corrected,
please provide an amended page with new calculations showing N uptake (PAN) and
Lbs of N Utilized. Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by
both the owner and the technical specialist.
2. On the last page of your Waste Utilization Plan's Table 1, please change the "Number of
Cows" to 200, not 500. Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated
by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested -
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below.
NCDENR-Non Discharge Permitting Unit (attn: Theresa Nartea)
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX 919-7,15-6048..,,
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer .. 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 80-0025
Gerald Foster
Page 2 +
The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before December 29, 2000 or
the Division will return your application as incomplete in acdordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H...0200 and
your facility will be considered to be operatingwithout a permit._
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid
permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subjectyouu to the
enforcement authority of the EnvironmentafManagement Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], ext. 375.
Sincerely,
eresa Nartea
Soil Scientist'
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
-cc:-M_ ooresville.Regional-Offidd;'Water Quality
Permit File

16CLA-
o�oF W A rFRPG - Michael F. Easley
` Governor
cn William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
>_l.0North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
'C Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 11, 2001
Gerald Foster
13210 Cool Springs Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Subject: Complaint Investigation
Silage Leachate Pond Discharge
La -Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-25
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Foster:
On July 2, 2001 this Office received a complaint concerning silage leachate being
discharged from the lower collection pond at your facility. That same day Mr. Alan Johnson
visited the facility. No evidence was observed of any discharge from the facility. However, the
embankment of the pond does require maintenance.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rowan County SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE (704) 663-
1699
1 800 623-7748 FAX (704) 663-
6040

Scott Foster
3900 Foster Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Dear Mr. Foster:
Michael F. Easley
• Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 11, 2001
Subject: Complaint Investigation
Silage Leachate Entering Stream
Rowan County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the report for the complaint investigation conducted on July 2,
2001 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Enc.
cc: File
AJ
NCOENA
Customer Service
1699
1 800 623-7748
6040
Sincerely,
1
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE (704) 663 -
FAX (704) 663-
t

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
919 NORTH MAIN STREET
MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
REPORT: Complaint investigation regarding discharge of silage leachate entering a stream.
DATE INVESTIGATED: July 2, 2001
CONDUCTED BY: Alan D. Johnson
TIME SPENT: 3 hours
LOCATION: La -Foster Dairy, Facility #80-25. Located on La -Foster Dairy Road (SR 1972),
approximately I mile North of Cool Springs Rd. (SR 1003), Rowan County
RIVER BASIN: Catawba River Basin
PERSON CONTACTED: Complainant
I: ' 03w,
On July 2, 2001 this Office received a complaint concerning a discharge of silage leachate from
a surface water collection pond at the Foster Dairy in Rowan County. The complainant stated
that in the evenings the odor seemed worse and that he had pictures of a discharge that had
occurred several days earlier. W. Alan Johnson visited the complainant and the facility on July
2 The complainant did have pictures of what appeared to be silage leachate and "waste"
discharging from a metal culvert pipe. During the investigation, Mr. Johnson noted that the
discharge pipe from the pond was capped and constructed of PVC. Mr. Johnson followed the
drainage "ditch" approximately 100 ft. to the small stream and saw no evidence of any leachate
entering the stream. He walked downstream approximately 50 ft. until he found a small pool of
water; no accumulation of leachate was observed (photos). Mr. Johnson also scrutinized the area
below the waste storage pond, however, no discharge or runoff was evident.
The complainant was informed that based on the investigation no further action is required by
DWQ. Also, the complainant was instructed to contact this office immediately if future
problems were observed.

µ•r ` QAµ �'1 ••� lA �' ����''� �1 ~�. �{ �L 1"33��r�`}� 'h
.-•, t '�;,.;,�„�..•' til_.,,,.. ��,.,
il�. • '%�/ ._' lt `�*",�� � . ' �t 'fir- «
LW
Mar,
Alit
AL
'r'.�•.`r?��`Y...�^ r''n� l 1•• •r •a , * ',• _� � �•f ;t• y. . _rte I}«'• ' , 1
Y • ,'� - /'
t- :�+; %'; 'r' • ,s 'l.. i fit`
r.. �'rp{.'}11 f�i e.�� j „'' t• �: ..._i.e• t� "'tet
a4 F

f S 1 , tiI•`.• � ! �, � ley.•*. ` w�,• •��`.'IO Si `,• ♦ '
t. •! i` y` �. ;c i' ..t• 4 �1 '';''` rf3t• ! 1'''S.'f A.•
y���_��•�� Illi'?,,���� '•Ic4P�.. •,{�Y.i•ar!!%�', rJ',!•1�,1,,n�.i,�,ly4�ys:
' .. � i • i w`! ^1: ate: .',I ., •....� t:�'I•�'.••
~r'• � Y�•"�:�1f �.rs �•1• .�"�� �"ti. �,4�r'Ir, t'r �.�� ff :11 _ �'!�.t Y,ti.� ..
�: �1` 1 1 {{t �j-•� '.'.l Tom•%J !�, •w� 'J ,� �.E�.e6 ` �j,,
•y. f .1 `'I � =r:• 5f" 1 '�� r.� •7 ►. � •.1"i �r5 .r'r t �r�•�� ! rf". .'
.. ,. -. � _ � '4 �.�>. ..,,•.'K•°:�:`.�''� �= �^,� ;�; •;y.;w is
�{-1 •,1,' ;F 'a`' 47 1
r�r,;'1r 1.17i�.r rs ,•�.) �t �'
'�: �;:.�. •r �. 1..-r ff } .i .L�,•1 j4i '� 1 I / .i., .•.:s •tt,�fy�.
'4�Fr ti At•..1� ::. -• ,. ,- ., aiA'1'' 'i.�p+'. �, �i ,4'•, •�-� ,�`, �, .�0,�4; •
'•* r• �}�� . ��' � . •�. aij� r.. Sim'/�`�'a I� ti4 it R �f `.�� '',;`�� � ^�y�
r
�
�i.1`•IS • vi :�'aY l±t. i'h�h r'�+MV� �'. /
• " �• (• ,�.�. 1 �~' !r: .y/ ' ,,i7 .� 1. `ti...
1.._'•I -? - <J s'..,� «rile ,�,rC.,n..�`,��•r.
`y •^ 7� `r'4'
!tom• '1,.\.• '`- -,' tf ��tr.,.i '.\'�{�: 4_,
a',1_' '•`YNR- �. 1'� f •. i
it
�! .., + 'r fir. t•.Ir'{M/` ,rf .�l}�``;i '�'� � .1. ;j•f�'�_ �{..�� A��
:lea. . '° • �r ; r,. .`� '• r
r. •.�,. IL ,S'�"��+'u '�',y,•:''�:,��,' I �� ,' *115'!' •.
�• ,�1� , pig' - •� , � ••1• '
•1Y , �~�'r, +r � �,` I yeti

5
,1
•
.. � f
• �
. _ • _+ u J
. � �
I
I}
f
��'
r
! _
! �
1
�
� �
1
`�
!
I ' 1! �
.�' r r,
.�,
�
�
�
1
�
�
1•'JI
.�
�'i� ,�. •'1
� •5�.�1 � .s
F•
+•'
•
1 � 1 i ! �i V � +
a , � 1 � • 1 � i 1 1 £ � • �. • ! ,1
e t � � � . d � '
.�
'••
,
'
�
..J• r a•J• �
- 7r ..• I� 1� 1,
1', '�tJ4�����I, f,IJ
�
� '••
,•
-
r✓� ,�• �•
" +�. � ••�� J� �Jr1�e,V 1.
a
14
nr ,.;: , �r.� rr�
� .. `,.,'a..1 Vit. �!�.1
, • i
�[e
a
'�
. �
• t.

���d,�:s,•M,a�°if lj•M�'
Fl
10
VQ
*k,
",�7'.t'S+w�VI:Y}`.!r�nY�"►i� ��h����f '! ��:e

�a c���/ �, d �/1�
�,Q 1 �S��a-f S

MRWAAMMWW"��
no

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 6, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
�era'la roster
La -Foster Farm
3765 Foster Rd
Cleveland NC 27013
Farm Number: 80 - 25
ilkq'�W'A
NCDENR'
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RONMENIT JRz'kL�
NATURAL RRSoURCp1
SEP 7 2000
Dear Gerald Foster: eI9'IS1UA pf WVIRONA44TAl NANARED
ennAI:SVIIIE REN1iA! UEFA? 1
You are hereby notified that La -Foster Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage under
an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty 60 days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation. information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1'617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Stephanie Milam at [phone] extension 544 or
Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
t
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
1

o�oF wAr�RQ�
O�^C
Gerald Foster
13210 Cool Springs Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Dear Mr. Foster:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
I
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 9, 2002
Subject: La Foster Dairy, Site Inspection Facility
Certificate of Coverage: AWC800025
Rowan County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 7, 2002. Based
on his observations, the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained; and the records were complete.
Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
Sincerely, /`
,1, --
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
TAi
�A
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

.4P
Type of Visit S Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation .
Reason for Visit S Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility NumberSO 25 MIC of Visit: $17/Z002 Time:
._. 0 =Not Operational 0 Beln%N- Threshoicl
® Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: - -- __ ._ ._ -...
Farm Name:]�a-k0�tlyt �Xm.LFa t&r..livad�........................................ ..... Count: lavyJan....... ......................... _.. MQ
Owner name: Gerald.----------------- �Qster----------------------------- Phone No: ?94-7$?.Sf>.-------------__----------
S -tailing Address: X20.Coia1.Rix.iiaad ...............................+I�Y�laad...�Y�................................. �TQxz..............
31r9Facility Contact: ...........................................................Title:............................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: CzF�3.A��D.F4_------------------------------- tntegrator:------------------------------___�----
Certified Operator:$jhgj?]a,.C.,........................ .... JFjQ5,tRx ................................................ Operator Certification Nuniher:2Q.9 ._..
Location of Farm:
From intersection of Cool Springs Rd. (SR 1003) and Foster Rd. (SR 1972), travel approximatley 1 114 mi, north on Foster
Rd. Farm on left..
❑ Swine ❑Poultry ®Cattle ❑Horse Latitude �• �� Longitude �• �• �•
Design'Current :Design ., ,.'-Current. =Design Current
.Swine 'CaDacitv Population °poultry . Ca- aci .To elation' 'Cattle 'Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ® Dairy 200 110
r ❑ Non -Layer IM Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design '.Capadity 200
Tota1.SSLW 280,000
Discharges S Stream Ini2aets
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in ualhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ )
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & "Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Stricture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Strucru're b
Identifier:-.....__._..--•-----•-----............................ --•-----•--•--•--•--•--•-- .
Freeboard (inches): 48
ncm2mi r.,.s....»a

.- VJ/S.MI'VR
I ,
l.UraaaraatCtl
FaeiligWN miier: 84-25 Date of Inspection 1 8/7/2002
e drofsfacWty tobeiter a=plainisltuat<ons.t(useaddi�analipagestasnecessary). ❑ �"
❑Final Notes
2����v.�-- �'•was.'`..��§rX'�C��^�a�...,�`i':� ''•g:�z,��- , t.-�.r."`�s`.�. ?�?.�_-�a-e.s��e ,,�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Q Z
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
El Yes
®Na
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Fescue (Hay) CORN Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Z No
22. Pail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes N No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�^r,�aa�:�¢• Yang::.>;�.��w.�,,;• r� s:. �;+�s-�a3•.,�, •. �--ec^^.r., .w--a-J.. ., .
Comm re er q ion ) platy any$ naw' ers andlor any recommendalianstar ny other�comment
e drofsfacWty tobeiter a=plainisltuat<ons.t(useaddi�analipagestasnecessary). ❑ �"
❑Final Notes
2����v.�-- �'•was.'`..��§rX'�C��^�a�...,�`i':� ''•g:�z,��- , t.-�.r."`�s`.�. ?�?.�_-�a-e.s��e ,,�
ED TO REMOVE SMALL TREES FROM STORAGE POND EMBANKMENT. GENERAL MAINTENANCE IS REQUIRED.
CORDS IN GOOD SHAPE.
.•,`pI
Reviewer/Inspector Name AI:'AN�OHNSON'�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Q Z

05103/01
Facility Number: 80-25 Date of Inspection 8/7/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
w.
Continued '
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
AddWonaltUlomment°r

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
t Health and Natural Resources •
Mooresville Regional Office
_ _
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 1DEEHNFz
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 9, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN_RECEIPT REQUESTED
Gerald Foster
3765 Foster Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
La Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-25
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Foster:
Enclosed is a copy of the Animal Operation Site Inspection report for the inspection conducted
by Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office at your dairy on April 4, 1997. The report should be self-
explanatory.
elfexplanatory.
Regarding your old facility on Foster Rd., Mr. Johnson observed a discharge due to a broken pipe
from the old milk parlor. Also, manure is leaving the paved area and bypassing the lagoon. These
discharges are a violation of the deemed permitted status pursuant to North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 (a) and Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC 2H.0217.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by April 30, 1997 indicating the
actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address your response to Mr. Johnson.
Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this or any other violations. Also, be advised that North Carolina General
Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation for noncompliance with state
environmental laws and regulations.
919 North Main Street, W 4 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 N'Mf An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Gerald Foster
Page Two
Concerning the new facility on Carson Rd., it was in good shape. However, as a certified farm
your files, at a minimum, need to contain the following:
Certification forms
Site schematic
Waste application records
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste management plan (if applicable)
The waste utilization plan is a component of the waste management plan
Soil analysis records
Your local Soil and Water Conservation District or Natural Resource Conservation Service can
assist you with this information.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either D. Rex
Gleason, Water Quality Regional Supervisor, or Mr. Johnson at [phone].
Sincerely,
B. Keith Overcash, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Rowan SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement File
AJ

SOF W A TFgP
�O G
cp r
Gerald Foster
13210 Cool Springs Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Dear Mr. Foster:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 11, 2001
Subject: Complaint Investigation
Silage Leachate Pond Discharge
La -Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-25
Rowan County, NC
On July 2, 2001 this Office received a complaint concerning silage leachate being
discharged from the lower collection pond at your facility. That same day Mr. Alan Johnson
visited the facility. No evidence was observed of any discharge from the facility. However, the
embankment of the pond does require maintenance.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Rowan County SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
AWA
N
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
�efY�l AJ Ue / 2
C�J9
Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

W A T�9Q
�O G
til �
Scott Foster
3900 Foster Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Dear Mr. Foster:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 11, 2001
Subject: Complaint Investigation
Waste Entering Stream
Rowan County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the report for the complaint investigation conducted on July 2,
2001 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Enc.
cc: File
I
N
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 26115 Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
919 NORTH MAIN STREET
MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
REPORT: Complaint investigation regarding discharge of silage leachate entering a stream.
DATE INVESTIGATED: July 2, 2001
CONDUCTED BY: Alan D. Johnson
TIME SPENT: 3 hours
LOCATION: La -Foster Dairy, Facility #80-25. Located on La -Foster Dairy Road (SR 1972),
approximately 1 mile North of Cool Springs Rd. (SR 1003), Rowan County
RIVER BASIN: Catawba River Basin
PERSON CONTACTED: Complainant
PIT:40i
On July 2, 2001 this Office received a complaint concerning a discharge of silage leachate from
a surface water collection pond at the Foster Dairy in Rowan County. The complainant stated
that in the evenings the odor seemed worse and that he had pictures of a discharge that had
occurred several days earlier. Mr. Alan Johnson visited the complainant and the facility on July
2nd The complainant did have pictures of what appeared to be silage leachate and "waste"
discharging from a metal culvert pipe. During the investigation, Mr. Johnson noted that the
discharge pipe from the pond was capped and constructed of PVC. Mr. Johnson followed the
drainage "ditch" approximately 100 ft. to the small stream and saw no evidence of any leachate
entering the stream. He walked downstream approximately 50 ft. until he found a small pool of
water; no accumulation of leachate was observed (photos). Mr. Johnson also scrutinized the area
below the waste storage pond, however, no discharge or runoff was evident.
The complainant was informed that based on the investigation no further action is required by
DWQ. Also, the complainant was instructed to contact this office immediately if future
problems were observed.

1 1
Ilk' 4•
�.
l'I ,
,
J • yr S
.l�� (�j�i .��?moi` ti�.`' •�'r.+f"r � Vii' :rY�lj.`���r,; - , „ •i`T ,�ra -!r .< .
hid; ! I , �. _• 'f .r'w`•-� �.,+ .:S NY r
r • •.1� —1" !'2•
�' �,/, 'S,', ri.rti r s 7 .e—, % �'�1i�s,,• �y��Cee,,,, I r \jti'���, 4.� 1 , ti ,ti '- i l • r i. ; �'
vni
I• I i ,
{ i'.�t', , / ,� 1��I Ill •i.

�0� W A r�R4
'O G
r
0 Y
Gerald Foster
13210 Cool Springs Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Dear Mr. Foster:
tl� --& tAi
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
WATER QUALITY SECTION
February 7, 2001
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
La Foster Dairy, Facility #: 80-25
Rowan County, NC
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on February 6, 2001. In general, the
facility appeared to be compliant with the certified plan except for the small trees that need to be removed from the
storage pond embankments. In review of your records, it was noted that the SLR I/II forms were neat and easy to follow.
However, the file needs to be better organized and maintained. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should
be self-explanatory.
Please note that the following items must be available for review by the inspector during the inspection:
• Certification forms.
• Site diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas.
• Waste application records, with accompanying waste analyses.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste utilization plan, tract/field number , usable/wettable acres (not necessarily total acreage), List of
crops, PAN required, and amount of waste produced by livestock.
• Waste and soil analysis information. Must have three years of data.
• Emergency action plan which must be posted.
• Insect, odor control, and mortality checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-
1699.
Sincerely, f /f
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
�opr
0—MR
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

�4
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O lagoon Evaluation a W L S c) 00
Reason for Visit LZ -Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number U -r Date of Visit: Time- .'7J
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
O'Permitted ❑ Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
Farm Name:
t Countv:..
Owner Name: ............�`rt .(.:��..�G ........ ..... 1"V.S.. mt Phone No: ......�.2.. .-.... .y� ,C. .................................
FacilitvContact: ...................................... ......................................... Title: ............... ........................ I....................... Phone No:............. ....
Mailing Address:........ r3..7/U...........ea;p... ear ..... .... ....l.aja.Cl. ....... .....................
.a� �.�'..1.�.
Onsite Representative, .........�.��.r s.�L .......
Interrator:
........................
Certified Operator: Jhe.. U j< Operator Certification Number ,,,, �}
.. ........................f:� 3.._.....t�
........................... n . ..I 5.�....
of Farm -
Swine ❑ PoultryG-1r Cattle ❑ Norse Latitude's , tj5 Longitude
Design Current
6%Vine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I V Dairy 200
❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present JEI Lagoon Area JCI Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes QsQo
Dischanm originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If- yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes i+I0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [] Yes NNo
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
s
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? �m Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier;
Freeboard(inches)...............LI.........................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes dZ11 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes [&No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require main tenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �M No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N1No
Waste (application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes "�o
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN (3 Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes X No
f
12. Croptype
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWNIP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes X No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
9'No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
RNO
Are rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
❑ No
'8. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
;9 No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
i,S No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
RNo
24, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®-No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
R:No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
'[;�LVo
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
rNo
'R
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attar below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
01/01/01
Continued

. Facility Number: _ Date of Inspection C�
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Printed on: 1/4/2007
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes R�No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
Cornments'(refer to question #) !Explaia any 3'ES answers and/or ariy iecommeni3attons orany outer comments
Use drarvtags of fa-10
in to better explaa sttuattons (use addi#toaaI-a Fi as necessary):FieldCopy ❑Final Notes
"e-
.�h f f�
�2 GL r "�2 S �i7 r`�i J ✓r s F l� O�'� e w C r7
1' e -s
`3
C Cil
t ^ w 1� t e_� Ce : c�v` � S �c�+��-c'e�, , �.�-ts .�L% — e.� e� y 5 � �� L � � e1I��]5'y la��� •t `-�
LA- � 41clYt[ v v` E
t
e -C e esu Q (4 VIP,
T
Reviewer/InspectorName ._r....x rl.m :1 , Y._ ., Vii• „$ —. Y,:i.. .,,r-; .
->-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ` Date:p
01/01/01

Facility Number -- Lagoon Number Lagoon Identifier
0 Active 0 Inactive Latitude 0 E] E Longitude E] E] E]
By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS ❑ Map GPS file number:
35. Surface Area (acres):
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Water supply well within 250 ft of the lagoon?
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
39. Distance to WS or HOW (miles):
40. Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards?
43. Was groundwater encountered during construction?
44. Depth to Groundwater:
45. Spillway?
46. Adequate Marker?
47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure?
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
O less than 300 ft O 300 ft - 1000 ft O greater than 1000 ft
0 Yes 0 No
0<5 05-10 0>10
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes 0 No O Unknown
0 Yes O No O Unknown
O Unknown
0 Yes O No
0 Yes O No
0 Yes O No
JJ%

of wAr f,
Michael F. Easley
Govemor
r William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
> North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Y Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 16, 2002
Gerald Foster
3765 Foster Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Subject: Operation Review/Compliance
La -Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-25 & 80-43
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Foster:
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. if
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
• r:
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johnson,/
Environmental Specialist II
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 BOD 623-7748 FAX [phone]

i
" JAMES B. HUNT.J
• GOVERNOR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 20, 2000
Gerald Foster
g 3765 Foster Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
La -Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-25
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Foster:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on July 13, 2000. The facility appeared to be in good shape, and the records
appeared to be complete. However, it was observed that the pump marker had not
yet been installed in the storage pond. This should be installed within 60 days of the
date of this letter. Also the liquid level gauge (which is required by the permit) must
also be installed at this time.
Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
Also, please complete and return to this office the enclosed form to "reactivate" your
facility.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Regional Coordinator
File
019 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POBT-CONSUMER PAPER

Facility Number { J z 5 Datc of'Inspection �
t Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
M Permitted !n Certified [j Conditionally Certified 5(Reristered Not Operational Date Last Operated:
����
........1 ...................... .
Farn, Name•: .,,..�...-... �..�,���,e�f.�a................................. ... Count}':.......................... ..............._._....
Owner. L^e I.. �`-� �..� r.... Phone. No ... � .-..........`.�.5 .1...
.................................... .
Faciliti' Contact: ..............................................................................Title:
Mailing Address:......7.rC................ %^`c..,1......-. y`.' i .............................
Onsite Representative:..., �"�.c ,_ O
Certified Operator ....... Ill �..L.!r~1.1.��.........
'116ation of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: .......................................... .
Operator Certification Number:.... _
A
r titude! ;•� Lunritude �• ' 4.
Design Current
S%rine Canarity Ponulation
D 'wean tc+ �„edcr j �
D F,.cdcr to Finish }
1� Farrow to 'Kean I i
IJ arrow to F:.ede. I I
E -D Carnoy. u, Finish E
D Gilts j
1! 3 Boars �
Design Current Design Current
Poultr _v Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
ID Laver ; Iii Dairy Z -co j IZ©
1D Non -Laver, { I 1D Non -Dairy
ED Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ED Subsurface Drains Present ED Laouon Area IE3 Spray Field Area:
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps f 1D ilio Liouid Waste Ntanarement Svsfem
I3ischar_es & Strean, imnactr
is anv discharge observe from an% part of the operation? Yes ZNo
Discharge originated at: j] Lagoon E) Sp -.ay r=ieid 17 Dtlter
n. l; discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? Yes D No
n. If discharge is obscr\-cd, did i[ rca:h atcr of [hc State'' (If yes. notify DWQi Yes ❑ No
If disciiaree is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'.
Dues disc'narLc Cfvpas� A lagoon systcm'' fi( vcs. notily DNN�QI El Yes El No
=. is there Evidence of pass. discharge from any par: of the operation."
_. 1� ere there any adverse impaCU or potcn mi adverse imnazis to the V:wcrs of the State other than from a discharge?
Wast- Coliection & Treatment
Is storage capacity (freeboard pias storm storage t less than adequate` D Spillway
Structure 1 Structure ? Structurc Structure 4 Structure 5
1dcnd ii::; :
`reeho:trU l imches l: z.....
_ . .ire thcr_ am' immediate threats to the inte_-rity o; anv of the structures observed'' (ie' trees, severe erosion,
seepage. etc.)
D Yes X No
ui Yes 1:k No
J Yes D Ivo
Structur.- ti
D `.'es K No
3�_;lcic Continued on pack

,cility Number: — UatC of ]nspcetion Printed on. 4/24/2000
Are there anv immediate threats m the inte_zrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes jP] No
seepage. etc.) ""��
Are the -e structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure pian? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Does any part of the waste ,management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
e?enation markinzs?
a.�tc Anniic-idon
). Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
Is the -e evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
?, Crco type
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAW7MP)?
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettabie acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Is the -e a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
-nuired Records & Documents
soil to have C -e tiFicate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
Does the facility fail to have all comoonents of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie.' WUP, checklists, design. mans, etc.) V
Does rezord keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports))
Is facility not in compliance with'any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie! discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Were any additional probierrts noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWI P?
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes No
JZ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes )?I No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes bio
❑ Yes XVo
❑ Yes1, Vo .
❑ Yes vqNo
❑ Yes XVo
❑ Yes F,No
❑ Yes k \o
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes jVo
❑ Yes E�kVo
❑ Yes Z -No
fir issues
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement buildingl0 the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ NO
Iiquid level of Iagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan biade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
Do the !lush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes [King
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �tVo
❑ Yes 5�YO
❑ Yes ❑ No

Facility Number: — Date of 1w.-pection
Additional Continents and/or Drawings:... w fi
QI�G,���acc t y5 tQil�� I�A��� 2��1 7�Clh fS YGiS
ZGC� C�Qv1r CCtL.:,L=rr�r cr` /` 15
���t
�r �
47
l
CI-ck C� 6,A
C- J C- ci cLc 4 1
CS -
7125197

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone] May 8 '98 15:18 P.02i02
REQUEST FOR REACTIVATION OF REGISTRATION
Please reactivate this following facility on the 2H.0200 active ananal operations list.
Facility Number. d
Facility Name: -
Owner. n
Mailing Address:
4�'. 1 r n v� 7df
County: •� c� r�
A copy of a complete Animal Waste Certification Form must be submitted with this form
in order for this facility to be reactivated,'bocumentation that this facility hes been
operated within the last four years must also be submitted. You will be notified by the
Division of Water Quality. when the facility has been reactivated and may stork im—mals
once notification is received.
If a facility is abandoned or unused for a period of four years or more, it would be
considered as a new facility if the owner wanted to reopen it and would have to meet all
requirements of a new facility before it could be restocked.
Please return completed farm to: DEHNR-DWQ
Noon -Discharge Branch, Compliance Group
P.O. Boz 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
';2 Fs I � S
AUG 1 6 2000
DIVIS4DN OF tiilAONthr 1AL M0+001T
MoMNLtE REe t ' r.2
RR -4l97

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 12, 1999
Gerald Foster
3765 Foster Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
La -Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-25
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Foster:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facilities on
March 5, 1999. This letter is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency for failure to have a
pumping marker installed in the waste storage pond at the main facility (80-43).
Because the new facility (#80-43) is certified, you should have an Emergency
Action Plan posted in a visible location. Also, the odor, insect control, and mortality
checklists need to be completed. Finally, you need to contact your technical specialist to
ensure the correct fields are receiving animal waste.
The Foster Road facility (#80-25) generally looked good. However, as discussed
during the inspection, you should seek removal from the state register by March 12,
1999. To do this may require the removal of some cows from the confined area so as to
fall below the threshold of 100 animals. Since you are operating without a special
agreement with the Division of Water Quality or a certified farm plan, this matter will be
turned over to the Attorney General's Office for appropriate action if you fail to seek
removal from the register.
Regardless, I urge you to continue working toward the completion of the work
necessary to obtain the certified status for the facility. If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-
1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
} Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rowan SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 IS
PHoNE[phone] FA%704-663-6040
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 809( RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Di inion of.Soil and Water Con§er.vation 'Operation Review ` �`
EX Divisfon,ofSoil "and Water "Co nservation - Compliance Inspect:on
Dwision of Water Quality Compliance Inspection
T
,
th'er,'Agerac' - Operation Review
Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Daty of Inspection '�$=
1'inae of Inspections 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted UCertified (© Conditionally Certified © Registered Q C3 Not er<�tional Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: iii///....��`...L�l...... Tv e�!r.............. !! {L! 1...................................... County:......[. `k�?-� 1'1...............................................
Owner Name :.......... ...............
.��`! �t...�`. Plione No:...............................................................................
` ....................................................
Facility Contact: % �`f``r.. Title Phone No: , �3
.........}......... �(....... ..........f..._ .........._........................................................ ` .,. ..?... ............... z.....
Maiiing Address: . �?..24+ 7 ... J.,,=......R.1... ... ..L'� 4 1C1.X11................................. .�. .11,?...
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator: ........................... ...................... .............................. I.......
Certified Operator ....... �'h.� .i . ................... 6.1c . ............................... Operator Certification Number:..,. fq. ............,
Location of Farm:
yf..............................................................
...........
...............................................................................................................
;........
...........................
..............
...................
/....................................................................... .... .................
I nude �]'�' ��� Longitude
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer r Dairy (�
❑ Non -Layer FO Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JCJ Subsurface Drains Present I❑ LatGvon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1, Is any dischargeobserved from any part or the operation (If ycs, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Ficld ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance rnan-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Irdischarge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharoe is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge From any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No -
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Yes �J No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 /`
Identifier:
�I
Freeboard(inches): .............f..,,,............................................................................................................................................................,.................................
-1/6/99 Continued on back

Facil[Wy" Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes *o
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes %No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes 'a,No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings`? 59,Yes ❑ No
Waste Auolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes�No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑ YeskPfNo
12. Crap type ....�C4 ` ............... .-I ................................... ...........................,.............,...................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required .Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. hail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes b Io
❑ Yes OrNo
[]Yes �No
❑ Yes I No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes J Mo
❑ Yes 5ZNo
0. No.vioJatioins'or. dehc' ieaic'j es .were noted. during - tiis:visit:. Y.ou will.receive no further :::: :
eorres'DkHidehee: bb6t: this visit.:: . : : .: ..:. . .. . . . .
Comments (refer„to question #):.Explain any YES answers and/or any:recommendations or any other comments ,,
Use drawings of facili ; to,'better ez lain situations. use additional, pages as necessa . �r ,
la ty P ( P g ry)
txDs�ec�.
�r
Ste\ CUrti;� W�c�Y`�` Ccs{rt�l��e
1 � �
ih lN>`c�P-Leer- t��e i ,��e i K � t�e in sl-�Va�� c cajS
�� �
�
vw.��r5 ��r•� � � �— G*t�r� IDt'�t-SCC � t3v+U�.�'t'.__ � tf� nor �-�c�5
l
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name �” J • a ;r ' ' ',,-:;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l Date: S
a
1/6/99

# ' Dtvrsion, of Soil arid-'Water:Cvnservaiiori - Operation Revtewo, .�,� ` ,n,t.; +� '„ E i€` ;E,'aj;a 3-E
s Drvrsron o'is oil and.Water Conservation Corrtphan`ce Inspection t3 r
n'§D1'Asion of Water
Operatton]ZeVmwlrance Inspection a t °
Other Age
outine Com laint
Q Follow-up
of DWQ inspection
Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Dace. of Inspeclion
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted © Certified
© Conditionally Certified Registered 13 Not Opera Operated: „•
Farm Name:.........l..r..lJ...........GE.rYYL
Owner Name: `j
.................................
�`d
DDa�tc Last
County:..........!til..``'.............,...............................
Phone No:.......
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title :................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ...... 2&-$ �r�� .................... .... .........................,........2 �..0..�.�..
Onsite Representative:..4!~ .t..�r.(. .... r ... Integrator: .... . ....... . ............. . ........................................................
Certified Operator:,�ke/, . X . ................. /J.„r. f1.......................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
1. . ion of Farm:
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
f
..................................................................:.................................. ........... ....................................................... ............. ...
titudc Longitude
Swine Capacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy"
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE3 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the coni°cyancc n3tm-made?
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach; ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If discharge is ohserved. what is the estimawd [low in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
A"Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes '4No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Yes1Vo
/K
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: !
Freeboard(inches):{....'.'.....................................................................................................................................................................................
116199 Continued on back

Fatuity Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management systen other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement`?
❑ Yes 52�4o ,
❑ Yes [/No
rw
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ENo
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑ Yes VNO
r ,
12. Crop type ...4711!�-.p%k ............. ..........................................................................................................................................................
13.
Do the receiving crops.differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14.
Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
`$] No
Required
Records & Documents ���
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) [:]Yes %.No
20. Is facility not in compliance. with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes $4 No
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes gNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ONo
23. Did reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes 2
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?❑YesJ No
: No.vialations'or de cie.....were .Hated daring .tlii�;vis...You .. .. ive .. F... . i.... .
ccjrrespgrideitee;abbot'this visit.; ;
'Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or.-any,,recommendations or,any oilier eomntents' 'r
Use.drawin s'of facility, to, better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary);' r + t f
,•--�--n n �i ore,c ats;sJ 4tc6 �-i�I C� -JO
Cu
��
a &r,, A-1 .1 16 e ��
\ Z `r o1c�5,
5 ' Wo'�C + ��us .�ie �+� 3 -�`-� tom' c� ea vt inw�l.l� ►� si/�1 ��}�ri
/L �Y' �43C.�q ��-L1�0`rC' ✓�OiN� Gc� ,^Yvf raja 5' l l� �ecU S !-p
4.6%,,V Ao,vA
--4(Ae'A.'La'ra:�s.' Y vrs�cf��c-EDrco•t
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,
b,e_. G c� t.►.�7 [ qtr":ci, ._�:,,;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - e-zt'G" — , 1'� Date: 4 S =�- 11/6/99

'4:NW
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
November 20, 1998
Mr. Gerald Foster
3765 Foster Rd.
Cleveland, North Carolina 27013
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral
La -Foster Farm
Facility No. 80-25
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Foster,
On November 17, an Operation Review was conducted of La -Foster Farm, facility no. 80-25.
This Review, undertaken in accordance with G. S. 143-215.1OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all
registered livestock operations during the 1998 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will
conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was noted that you had a discharge that bypasses the lagoon system,
G. S. 143-215.10E requires me to notify Division of Water Quality and the owner/operator of this
observed violation.
As discussed during the Review, it is imperative that this problem be eliminated as soon as
possible. You are strongly encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist for help. You
may also want to contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District Office since they may be
able to provide you with additional technical and/or financial assistance to implement corrective best
management practices.
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with environmental
regulations, animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems must be properly sized, maintained and operated
under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
Also remember that all registered livestock operations were required to obtain and
implement an approved animal waste management plan by the end of 1997, and to gain certification
as a animal waste system operator. The animal waste management plan must be certified by either a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For additional assistance with the plan,
please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District Office or local Cooperative Extension
Service Office.
9t9 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESV ILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28t 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]o
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -80% RECYCLE13/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Gerald Foster
November 20,1998
page #2
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this
Operation Review. Please do not hesitate to call me at 7041663-1699 ext. 276 if you have
any questions, concerns or need additional information.
Sincerely,
y
Rocky D. Durham
Environmental Engineer I
Enclosure
cc: Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Alan Johnson, DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files

Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of
Facility Number 80 25 I
® Registered [3 Certified 13 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted
[low -up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 11/17/98
Time of Inspection 14:30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farre Name: LA-.F.oSter.Farm............................ ..... County: RQVAIA............................. . IMO...........
........................................................... .................
OwnerName: Gerald .................................... Faster .......................................................... Phone No: 704-z.7.8,459G........... ......... .......................................
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title:........................ .... Phone No:...................
MailingAddress: 3.7.b.5.Foatct:.tid..................................................................................... ...................................1.111... 27OU ..............
Onsite Representative: Slielhi,a.faster.................. Integrator•
Certified Operator:Shelbia-C .............................. Foster ............................................... Operator Certification Number:109,45 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =• =, =" Longitude =• =, ="
Desi n e' ECurrent.[' E E , E t Desi n "'I i'�' Current Ki E i
g , esrgn urrent'
Swine Ca acrty Pbpulatiori , Poultry , 'i ,. ' !Capacity ��Populnt�on ��Cat e', „� ''ECapacity, EI'opulation
❑ Wean to Feeder I ❑ Layer I I0 Dairy 1 90
❑ Feeder to Finishi' ❑Non -Layer "i ® Non -Dairy 55
Farrow to Wean !,!II: ,
Farrow to Fee er ❑ Other
arrow to rnrs Total °Design Capacity 55
Lj Gilts s
LJ Boars,
4 QUO
:
p Total SS 4
i
Wl
Number of Lagoons/ Holdrng�Pondsd 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Fieid Area
.. �
` ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Syst=em
All
t, s
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? IN Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ® Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ® Yes ❑ No
maintenancetimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ®No
7/25197 Continued on back

IFac'ilit<y Number: 80-25 1 Date of Inspection 1 11/17/98 I
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Crop type ,lC[la�l..�Z> alxi.(13te�.Bi��y.,..................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No:viotations.or. deficiencies,were;noted;during 'this' -sit You; wiil.receive no. further.
' :correspondence about this;visit: ; ; ; ' ;
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
'.;1.: �'...i: ........ .s" �.,... ;€." r',!�C _.F,:.'[§ -'.•t,;l.'f;r'•1c'tf:rlE�.,St...3r-[-.A.itd[�Fa:#.7FaS1F�r;[J.fn;tmitl[-;s :t. ,h P.:g9:..EA.-,..:I... k.F.,1. .. `�i-a}F�}e�F k }: z.�'rrl '•�}`�
V I
re
Comments:{refer to question #). (Explain any# YES answers andlarany_,recommenations ar any,other; comments
Si n tIr
Structure 1. Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Stn}cture 6
# 2 Discharge is runoff from free stall and milking parlor area. Also, silage leach ate. Discharge flows into a small farm pond and
Identifier:.............................................................................................................................................
......................................................................
# 3 There is also evidence of a past discharge from and opening in the curb of the holding area, above the WSP.
Freeboard (ft): ...............f,.Sl..................................................................................................................................................................................................
Waste flows into an eroding ditch into the storage pond, when the ditch overflows it bypasses the WSP.
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
® No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
® Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ,lC[la�l..�Z> alxi.(13te�.Bi��y.,..................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No:viotations.or. deficiencies,were;noted;during 'this' -sit You; wiil.receive no. further.
' :correspondence about this;visit: ; ; ; ' ;
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
'.;1.: �'...i: ........ .s" �.,... ;€." r',!�C _.F,:.'[§ -'.•t,;l.'f;r'•1c'tf:rlE�.,St...3r-[-.A.itd[�Fa:#.7FaS1F�r;[J.fn;tmitl[-;s :t. ,h P.:g9:..EA.-,..:I... k.F.,1. .. `�i-a}F�}e�F k }: z.�'rrl '•�}`�
V I
re
Comments:{refer to question #). (Explain any# YES answers andlarany_,recommenations ar any,other; comments
Si n tIr
.c.3 -..:.;i.l..f,:..r: f� `ss4..f�..s�.. . . • 19l.11.ti iii .- � '+,..s:L.. ErcE!:,Lir!€BiER1E 0i PiP g Pffi�.F,. d 3:i Mil- E:€
Use;drawmQs ai, facrLi}y; ta` better ex lain 3sttuations:`� use`Ifaddttionaljj [�a es9 as necessarSIE?l ,€ { `,, s ?r,r
(
—J - ii'i 4. j`E'f t I f j.
-. t.. �..'�tt.i,hl. �.O,'A'ssiii,�(ise� �8Y1di[€�'fP:�}€E�Ei�l�kljif6i.iz£E.^3,��?�..,..i.,....t,..9a.��rziEt�SFi����.�Ei:iFlt,t�.�it'..�..i,.:ih£�i.A 3rzYs'-5§E}r
# 2 Discharge is runoff from free stall and milking parlor area. Also, silage leach ate. Discharge flows into a small farm pond and
then out the overflow pipe.
# 3 There is also evidence of a past discharge from and opening in the curb of the holding area, above the WSP.
Waste flows into an eroding ditch into the storage pond, when the ditch overflows it bypasses the WSP.
# 12 Groundhogs and small trees on the storage pond need to be removed.
# 13 No max. liquid level marker.
Owner was informed that he would have to be referred to DWQ.
ail
!! µ� �i, I N .1Y� �y }
Reviewer/Inspector Name Rock 'DsDurha�ti" pal,DN �'� �'i����"1 pl
4
P do yFr �K
�rk. ➢ r7r f�q_. #f > nAl
n .` H_ Rir ._f S_.;W9}..k
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Nnmherr RR -2G 71a4a of lncnnrfinn 111171of2

ate of North Carolina
epartment of Environment,
and Natural Resources
1 -1 Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
1�
lye
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
iViEMORANDUNI
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley
1AP�
rte•
N CAm D E N"K*1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL Rz*ouU5pFs
ENV I r OF
:j
MAR 11 1996
p1y;'StoN c� t►�:<<an;,�FMT�.i :<�=s i;dfllT
LELaruil%It
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility numbr-lio�i �f
_ 1 ,
Any comments that the regional office can provide on the issuance of a special agreement to this
facility by the EMC would be greatly appreciated. Please provide any comments in writing (e-
mail messages are acceptable) to me as soon as possible.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
733-5083, est. 581.
ATTACHMENT
'Y 5awe_ ��w� -cxS
A C-c<D o- W c, -e_ o-� p cro to L- S
JL 01,
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Alrkmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural ResourceRECEIVED
Division of Water Quality
MAR 0 6 199 3
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORMATION RQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPEdAl A6GiEiEISP1�N� T 0f�j
Nor-n',xhzrga Cor,,,p�ianc0 Erlf,
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the FaciIity)- Zzl�
2. Facility No.:_ �d-o?_7
3. Facility Name: -
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible fur the faci:;ty wid it; coxrpliwrlce):
5. Mailing Address:
City: State: V!;2 Zip: c2 ?D
Telephone No.:
6. County where facility is located:�/LJ
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle):
8. Application Date:
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved aifimal waste managernent plan by a date certain and shall provide that the —E!"IC" shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These .
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
FORM SPAG 1198 Pase 1 of 4

2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of pians developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
FORM SPAG 1198
Page 2 of 4

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Applicant's Certification:
I, , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knoxviedge. I understand if all required parts of this application are not completed and if all
this document_ removes my responsibility and liability for complying with all North Carolina
General Statutes and Regulations. I understand that the failure to meet any. dates_ that are agreed
upon b%- myself and the EMC will result in appropriate enforcement actions being taken by the
ENIC.
j d -4-
Print Name of Owner
Date ,.3 �::Za..
Signature of Owner
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 3 of 4

r
Required Items:
One 1 original and two (2) copies of the completed and appropriately executed
aRplication ornr along with any attachments.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
FOR:1I SPAG 1198 Page 4 of 4

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVIL.L.E REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 7, 1998
Gerald Foster
3765 Foster Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
La -Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-25
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Foster:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on April 2,
1998. During the inspection, the following deficiencies were noted and need to be addressed
in your certified farm plan:
• Runoff from the trench silos needs to be diverted away from the small pond used by
the animals for drinking.
• Curbing on the paved lot next to the waste storage pond needs to be repaired.
• Ground hog burrows observed on the waste storage pond embankments need to be
filled.
• Need to ensure that waste does not discharge through the drainage ditch running
through the middle of the paved lot.
• Application records for the waste removed from the storage pond were not available.
It is requested that you provide this office with a copy of the completed waste
application records by April 24, 1998. Please mail the copies to the attention of Mr.
Johnson.
If you have any questions regarding the issues above, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rowan SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 291 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POSTCONSUMER PAPER

F„z` Date of Inspection
acility Number
Time of Inspection 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
egistered [] Certified © Applied for Permit ❑ Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
FarmName: ....... 4�?......... �:t: .....!�............................................. County:........... '!.!:o ,r......Y..\..................................,..........
OwnerName:....... :'.! .&............... f�.... ........... ................................... Phone No: ................ I— .......
....
Facility Contact: ..................................................................... Title: Phone No: ...... ......
Mailing Address:...,..7�ra...5................ �................................... .........' �.:� 1...............................�?..�}.�.�
Onsite Representative: ..........��„rQ .,�,�r .... Integrator: ...........................................................
�:f//
Vi...................... Operator Certification Number;..,.o2.`f;
...............Certified Operator-, ,....., r. .. ....................
Location of Farm:
�
. 4>....... �b�......... �,....!....3g.7,�.......
,........... �........t l .. ... .... s:.... a.r:�.... C? ............................. .. �, ............! .
� r1 i ....,R�.... .... rte? . h.a: -` - ... ta....... 1�...1q.7.. ....... ...I -Alf............ n. .... i .....r,�.` ......�e'r�- ..f .................. .
Latitude •. 6 « Longitude " { 44
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
`ent
atinn
Design Current
Capacity Population
Subsurface Drains Present JLJ Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
`eneral
1. 'Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon' ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 9Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes -No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes )9 -No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 31-blo
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number:
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to he properly closed'? ❑ Yes No
Structures f t agoons,11olding Ponds. Flush i'it.s, ete.t
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? C3�
Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..............................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ..............<...................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
XLYes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
de� k-+-ee. i `fie- c.o reef,r a Yt� ��+lC�' 11 C_3 rr'�t;i°`.'��1�
an immediate puhlic health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Vie_ ,•�„v,jC grave.. `�t,.e_e►-,c� s;dos s�C�u1c�! die_ c��ue_�r�re� GwG`•:yy� `�'Gtie
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
. 9Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
Wa� e�^l±kvlQ� t� ct!:A� c� � � C o��-� On r _(_C"r&s rl0 0_,z ex � ;r 7125197
T
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application'?
❑ Yes
JZLNo
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type .................... ..L�.> ...y.....C.v.r1................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)'?
❑ Yes
IN0
WIN
lb
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
No
1$.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
'ffNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
V�.No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
16 No
21.
i
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
ff No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement'?
UYes
ElNo
[
For Certified or Permitted Faciliticti_i7nly n%/,* Ams ►z C 4,
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No.violations or deftciencies.were noted during this.visit..You.will receive no further
cyrrespandence about this. visit.
Corilments (refer. io. question #). Explain any YES answers and/or any recotnnnendations or any other comments .,
Use,di•aw�ngs of facility to better eieplanrtuat;ons (use additicfnalpages`as.nesary}
U r
b��-t�� Q� `� C i�V-.4e, t wc-��
12-) `rl.e< �o.,.,,,d,lr ti�V6A,
P0,14 s�o �. /� b � Od t o, a:.. � ��-� � c�c- � e,.�. L 0.,s e- o�-Ak-'k--
de� k-+-ee. i `fie- c.o reef,r a Yt� ��+lC�' 11 C_3 rr'�t;i°`.'��1�
.��.��. � �k• ..1'� a1s� .10+� ' ��: iter .
Vie_ ,•�„v,jC grave.. `�t,.e_e►-,c� s;dos s�C�u1c�! die_ c��ue_�r�re� GwG`•:yy� `�'Gtie
�a1
Az Ic-k caa.ov+\-,-I �.►���L, �.� c+�i ��e � ��,u< �y z V-e.c.•�.z•
Wa� e�^l±kvlQ� t� ct!:A� c� � � C o��-� On r _(_C"r&s rl0 0_,z ex � ;r 7125197
T
Reviewer/Inspector NameI� `j6 S.C1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Form SLUR -1
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
For Recordina Slurry Application Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner q_— Facility Number
Spreader Operator
N.C. DBP I". Ot-
qNVlKpNMWT, WEALTH,
& N kTURAL RASOURCFS
.APR 2 2 1998
Trail #
Field #
Date
(mm/dd/yr)
Crop Type
Field Size
(acres)
Application
Method
# of Loads
Per Field
Volume of Loads z
Q -1-9v
aZ51:6 6 A .+
/
E/�
a T
/j -L)
7
3a 6-D
4:-:k k� S
3
0 -=C,-gs>
13 2
1 Q
3a as
SI = soil incorporated (disked); BR = broadcast (surface applied)
2 Can be'found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.

Form SLUR -2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Field #
cin
.7 u
1 4
Facility Number RA _ 2"
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operator's
Address 7/p 4Z
Operators Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN
Loading (Ib/acre) = (B)
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
m
(a)
Date
(mmldd/yr)
# of Loads Per Field
Volume of Loads t
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume Per Acre
(gallac)
(a) * (A)
2
Waste Analysis
PAN {Ib/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(Iblac)
x +
I(5) ($)) 1,000
Nitrogen Balance 3
(Iblac)
(B) _ (7)
�;:k mc�
C-5a,LTD
Crop Cycle Totals I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) 5 W I j 'g'� !Lr' -4Y'
Operator's Signature
Operator Certification #
' Can be found in operators manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.
' See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (8). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (B) following each application event.

Form SLUR -2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone:
Field #
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Facility Number I RD I_ C, -
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operators
Address %/� S ��a,c.Dii..�% i1j C
Operators Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
�Recommended PAN
Crop Type � Loading (Ib/acre) = (B)
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Date
(mmldd/yr)
# of Loads Per Field
Volume of Loads t
Total Volume
(gallons)
x
Volume Per Acre
(gal/ac)
+
z
Waste Analysis
PAN (Ib/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(Ib/ac)
x + 1,000
Nitrogen Balance 3
13) - ( )
G,:I
1111-4
Crop Cycle Totals I i
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) 6 h le I b I C, F7�-may.,
Operator's Signature &g ,� , �`nuo—,
Operator Certification # &139 µ
' Can be found In operators manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer If you do not have your owner's manual.
2 See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.

Form SLUR -2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Field #
1.Jc1n.7 �a
I ,
N e
- 8ga 11 1`
Facility Number eo I- a
Spreader Operator 4
Spreader Operator's
Address 3^((oS , �fJ Q,,. ,J/l�I"
Operator's Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN
n Loading (Ib/acre) = (B)
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Date
(mm/ddtyr)
# of Loads Per Field
Volume of Loads t
Total Volume
(gallons)
Volume Per Acre
(gal/ac)
z
Waste Analysis
RAN (lb/1000 000 gal)
PAN Applied
(Ib/ac)
x 6 + 1,000
Nitrogen Balance 3
B)(lb- ( )
1�
Sao o
I
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature�� Ae]-
Certified Operator (Print) tSh e I �p't /)., ^FD -<-Ip—" Operator Certification # aD4 YS
Can be found In operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.
2 See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis Is required within 60 days of land application events.
3 Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.

Form SLUR -2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
4-3 u S Field #
RJ
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Facility Number I�?b - a
Spreader Operator .
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #j��
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN
Loading (Ib/acre) = (B)
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Date
{mm/ddtyr)
# of Loads Per Field
Volume of toads I
Total Volume
(gallons)
(Z) x (3)
Volume Per Acre
(gallac)
(4) + (A)
2
Waste Analysis
PAN (Ib11000 gal)
PAN Applied
(Ib/ac)
((b) x (g)) + 1,000
Nitrogen Balance 3
(Ib/ac)
Crop Cycle Totals I I
Owner's Signature�__ -aOperator's Signature Q 40,1
Certified Operator (Print) 6 h , l h ; 0,,, FDsLLe -, Operator Certification # % eA
Can be found in operators manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.
2 See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis Is required within 60 days of land application events.
3 Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (1B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.

Form SLUR -2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Field #
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Facility Number I Irea a s
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type �ai��7
Recommended PAN
a A . Loading (lb/acre) = (B)
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Date
{mmlddtyr)
# of toads Per Field
Volume of Loads I
Total Volume
(gallons)
Volume Per Acre
(gal/ac)
Waste Analysis 2
PAN (lb/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(lb/ac)
x + DDD
Nitrogen Balance 3
(lb/ac)
3,-4 0z>
2 ? & v-ta
q qb
1.1
1t� ,� nL
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) 0%w,% b, xJ
Operator Certification # aQ
' Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual -
2 See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis Is required within 60 days of land application events.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.

Form SLUR -2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
-Y.,7 4 S Field # 4
In'a,
Facility Number _ S
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #�yy_
From Animal Waste Management Man
Crop Type
Recommended PANF--
L
I Loading (lblacre) = (B)
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Cate
(mmlddtyr)
# of Loads Per Field
Volume of Loads r
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume Per Acre
(gallac)
(4) + (A)
2
Waste Analysis
PAN (lb/1 DDD gad
PAN Applied
(Ib/ac)
I(b) x (6)1 + 1.000
Nitrogen Balance 3
B) - ( }
41 l
/013S
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Sn.EOir�� `j�j Operator's Signature —5s)z
Certified Operator (Print) �� 1 , o,_, Ff) ems Operator Certification #
Can be found in operators manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer If you do not have your owner's manual.
2 See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis Is required within 60 days of land application events.
3 Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Gerald Foster
La -Foster Farm
3765 Foster Rd
Cleveland NC 27013
Dear Gerald Foster:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
N.C. DePT. ()Ir
S.t►t-Yttzotis�L�r���, tr,�:., �,-s•Irt
& NATURAL ti is Uuitt;i:9
FES 25 1998
WI31ON OF ENVIROXMIATAI &`VII, ;49T
Owan,-ILI RfilINAt OffICE
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
La -Foster Farm
Facility Number: 80-25
Rowan County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application fora special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%o post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn:, Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleich NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised. of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued, Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance..
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

'N.c.I)wr.O
"$NVIROT3MENT, URALTH ,
NATURAL RESOURCES
.► R-2-91997
D, moo „����aL�rath�r�
—y

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Gerald Foster
3765 Foster Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Dear Mr. Foster:
�i I P�/u3✓'
9 4
, 7rL));1
IDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 9, 1997
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
La Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-25
Rowan County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the Animal Operation Site Inspection report for the inspection conducted
by Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office at your dairy on April 4, 1997. The report should be self-
explanatory.
Regarding your old facility on Foster Rd., Mr. Johnson observed a discharge due to a broken pipe
from the old milk parlor. Also, manure is leaving the paved area and bypassing the lagoon. These
discharges are a violation of the deemed permitted status pursuant to North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 (a) and Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC 2H .0217.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by April 30, 1997 indicating the
actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address your response to Mr. Johnson.
Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this or any other violations. Also, be advised that North Carolina General
Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation for noncompliande with state
environmental laws and regulations.
�W
919 North Main Street, W * FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 rf An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Gerald Foster
Page Two
Concerning the new facility on Carson Rd., it was in good shape. However, as a certified farm
your files, at a minimum, need to contain the following:
Certification forms
Site schematic
Waste application records
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste management plan (if applicable)
The waste utilization plan is a component of the waste management plan
Soil analysis records
Your local Soil and Water Conservation District or Natural Resource Conservation Service can
assist you with this information,
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either D. Rex
Gleason, Water Quality Regional Supervisor, or Mr. Johnson at [phone].
Sincerely,
d
B. Keith Qvercash, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Rowan SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement File
AJ

J
t
DSWC An><maI Feedlot Operation Review,
�'�`z,"�. x:w
,.`:':.s ✓..x`�x -r :. S ,.,2. -:- Y.
-DWQ<Ani�maI Feedlot Operai�on S><fe inspec. on � g •�;s F
�-..+i�, y'' , �" .t,- .`,•�' •sr re.e"' r k v •� rk-s`c�.i: �r.."re,y�'4
outine 0 Com laint 0 Follow-up of DNV2 inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 12= Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: �i C�._.__.�.. Total Time (in hours) Spent onReitriezv
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: ZQ
a�i r�rr. _�. ..- County: �'...kL_......r........._ ._
j.......�...�.
Owner Name: Irl/---`�..,,_ Phone No:
Mailing Address:��
Onsite Representative: +, _ Integrator:...___._ r.�.
Certified Operator: ._ . _..„ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
ONE
! r
— - e� w
Lauivae J.ongltuae I_ 1- l I _ 1"
❑ Not O erational
Date Last Operated:
A ype or uperation ana vesign capacity
iSwine x^ .Number,
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
�R
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Poultry',.NU
❑ Other Type of Livestock p
3 4 srl Y yw$d�`>�'k ,� k uw• ;'a _ � �
Number of Lagoons(�ioldfngPonds~ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
rr*w•# z .rx' x.,q r b'r'a., Y i � ac'yea� -"& w"^ ��'
❑ Lagoon A�'
rea ❑ Spray Field Area 9'
,�•+a,.Y.M N .graY:! wi asst/ �5 F s...`t , '� „?� � # . , x a �i e
!rdneral
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes J'No
2 Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWt) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes gNo
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes $D No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 14 No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. r Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 111197)?
8. Are there Iagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons andlor NoldinLPondsl
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Logo 1
Lagoon 2 . Lagoon 3
❑=Yes WNo
r ,
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes tTIo
❑ Yes ❑ No
Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes R •NO
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [:]Yes X No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,I No
(IPany of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence'of over application? ❑ Yes ERNa
(If in excess of WMP,'o��rr/runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type !11�.!LhG_Cdrr .. -------
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? ❑ Yes No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes EK No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement? ❑ Yes gNo
I9. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? Yes ❑ No
For Certified Facilfties Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes MNo
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Pian in any way? ❑ Yes ®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? JM Yes ❑ No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ERNo
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes JKNo
Comments (refer to question #): �ExpIain any, YES answers andlor.any.recommendations &-any other comments'°
- �@- -first' 'ra{vi
Use drawin s of facili to better ex lain situations. use additional. a es as neves
.. .. v .... ...... .. ................. _ .Yu..i"�f
-PL, K J
�y
Q
vL til ee.c %
st,�C�c�5 5 .soIO.w,a�L'C, wUs ��5�� av,�L siS� A 0,l�
Co:l4-ez yo`>.v- toe"(
Was ;r-\ jcyb� ska` e
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Sectionj acility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

V � u �,..� 4" r, �. .•. � ,;. , '-� c^-• -t :. [7 r �� •z v..� W 3 41 t�f ?M1 �S � �"f�,�rs a ' ,3 cx�
4 xW ❑ DSWC Animal Fet=,dlpt Operation Review f ;
"
°e--" ��, ...�.m,r " w '�. �t c* - -'€'� ��''. _.:. 5c cs« �".r"�'�' s ». r.� fir, n:� Y�v k Y__•�•�. Krs ^:,'a ,o-.,�+rx0 -r ...r.,,.�" � �} � ,
,� � �-DWQ`�Animal Feedlot Opexahon Site �nspect�on `'' � _� x
a � `
.-.• ^KS .raw.. .. .. ,. ., .. .. `-.- :., -r.. ... cx ,.�..
Routine O Complaint O Follow-uof DWQ inspection O Follow-uof DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status:_.. „`:f,Ve oe Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: �.:;c �. `�!.f!`�'1 __.. r.. _. County: �.�=:1 _.._ ........-....»».- .-...._.
Owner Najne: _ _ _rte�C_ —. Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: -ZL==as,6-- _,, Integrator:.
Certified Operator: „� ._N Operator Certification Number.
Location of Farm:
.... „NOW=
Latitude Longitude
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: U` v-
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Pus~ Cool 5�+r�►�5 R .)
Swine 4 to Number Poultry-«�
ry
Number zs#Cattle " uaiber
., "
Latitude Longitude
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: U` v-
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Pus~ Cool 5�+r�►�5 R .)
Swine 4 to Number Poultry-«�
ry
Number zs#Cattle " uaiber
., "
❑ Wean to Feeder
0
r
❑EN�on-Liyer
❑ Feeder to Finish
`""'
❑
❑
El Farrow to Wean`
�
xQ 1+("x,56 tab 'e•,oFy. Y }�.-. #19f.
.-
El Farrow to Feeder
YINL` Y": iiF 'T'Nent�. F4 ,f`a tS '9 .o W M1 ' JS
F<
Farrow to Finish
❑ Other Type of Livestock
4 :
Number of Lagoons 1 Holdibg Ponds �� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present aR.
:Yx°` :; w �� ,� .Y ❑ Lagoon Area : ❑Spray Field Area
neral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes M10
2- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? („Yes ❑ No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ENO
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ENO
.c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? I
d. Does discharge bypass a Iagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) EMS ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? M Yes ❑ No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes gj�iQo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require M -Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes RN''o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? ❑ Yes, ['Flo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes W -No
Structures (Latoons_andlor Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑ Yes ZNo
Frceboard (ft): Lao I Laeoon 2 Lagoon 3 lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 9NO
I I. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes WNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ®-No
(Irany of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
05 -yes
❑ No
.Waste .4,2Llication N/ -
14.
Is there physical evidence'of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
(If in excess of WMP,'or runoff entering waters of the State', notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
1 S.
Crop type_ �e S &L,& G..t:?Y ) ...�k ! + R t/1
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the cover crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Fnr Certified Facilities Only AV#
20.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments mrttents
Use drawin(s of facli �io�lietter explain situations use addn onalana : �co�mme�daaons or any o er co k� `. .
hawIS
4
✓�0�tc�
ave -OL js1eea(5 A be,
a
Reviewer/Inspector Name Vio
S
Reviwer/inspector Signature:Date:
cc. Division of Nater Quality, Water Quality Section, F ciliry Assessment Unit 11/14/96

A -
e.
.: NCDENR -
JAMES S_ HUNTJR:--%
GOVERNOR
--WAYN6 Mcl7EVtTT
SECRETARY �i•:`y��,; -
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 23, 1998
Gerald Foster
3765 Foster Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Subject: Site Inspection
La -Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-25
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Foster:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
.lust as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone]RO FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

i
Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen (N) AMlication for_Common Crops_
• Small Grains: One-third (113) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (112) of the N in mid-February to March and one -
y` half (1/2) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some .
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis {FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4 .
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

i
Page 3
Waste samples/analvsis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
pi6&cer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later data.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
cc: Lincoln SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
�y1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. $ - 3
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:, 1995
Time: :/S
Farm Name/Owner: LL4_f-L6LL.
Mailing Address: 3W gnj �_�- ��X _UL 2'7b 15
County:Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representati
Phone:
Physical Address/Location: J_M I -W
Type of Operation: Swine_Poultry_Cattle Zesign Capacity:___Number of Animals on Site:1
Latitude:
Longitude:
Circle Yes or No
Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches or No Actual Freeboard:25�Ft. Inches
Was any seepage ooserved from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: -
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dweilin . e r No
100 Feet from W s? Ye r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Ye r o
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Y or o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes oq9 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or6;1
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name __� Ok 4 Lei
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Signature '

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Gerald Foster
3765 Foster Rd.
Cleveland, NC 27013
Dear Mr. Foster:
QE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
iNR
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
La -Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-25
Rowan County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31,.1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street,
N��C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. cr arson,-�
Water Quality gional Supervisor
cc: Rowan SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
01j

Site Requires Immediate Attention: _„_
Facility No. go-i�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:, 1995
Time: 11'/
Farm Name/Owner: 6etedl hckt. _.
Mailing Address: 37 to S fnsi / a qld�
County: Integrator: - Phone:
On Site Representative: Ter' o- AN&OL Phone:
Physical Address/Location:(nLet% XV
LL
Type of Operation: Swine_Poultry_Cattle Design Capacity:14.,Number of Animals on Site:_ss—
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have
es��
sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches3(�'e� or No Actual Freeboard:L Ft,- Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or00 Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available/for spray?Ye or No Is the cover crop adequa es No
Crop(s) being utilized: 4=
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? els r No
100 Feet from We s? e Ir No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o 0
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes 06) If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes 0-15)
Inspector Name 0 L-09 LL, Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, VVA
Health and Natural Resources •
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor E)P.HNF;Z
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
N.C. DEPT. OF
Gerald Foster ENVIPONR4ENT. F-rr kUl'iir;
La -Foster Farm & NATURAi, !t1,1S()U1,CsTS
3765 Foster Rd
Cleveland NC 27013 DEC 17 1996
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: La -Foster Farm DIVISION 4F EHVIRONi VITAL i,ANNOY1111T
Facility ID #: 80-25 U012ESYA.IE REGIONAL OFFICE
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Foster:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste; was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WI'CSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or.
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
go, X , U T
/- k�
FOR Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System:�� Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission �a An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 T 74_ 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Linda Diane Lang, Regional Manager
4k,
EDIEHNF;Z
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 5, 1995
Mr. Gerald Foster
3765 Foster Road
Cleveland, North Carolina 27013
Subject: Silage runoff to Unnamed
Tributary of Fourth Creek
CAFO Facility No. 80--25
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Foster:
inspection of your dairy facility was conducted by John
Lesley of this Office on September 21, 1995. The inspection found
that the animal waste lagoon was adequate; however, seepage from
the silage storage area was discovered to be flowing into an
Unnamed tributary to Fourth Creek. A follow-up visit was conducted
on September 24, 1995 for the purpose of collecting samples and
compiling stream data. Representatives of the Rowan County
Agriculture Extension Office, the Rowan County Soil and Water
Conservation District, and Mr. Lesley met at the dairy on September
27, 1995 and discussed various actions which may be taken to
eliminate the discharge.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this
Office by no later than October 23, 1995 describing.actions taken
to eliminate the discharge of silage runoff to the stream. In
responding, please address your response to the attention of Mr.
Lesley.
Should have any questions concerning this matter, please
contact Mr. Lesley at (7.04) 663-1699.
Sincerely,
x2::
D. Rex GI as P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: --Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Rowan County Agriculture Extension Service
Rowan County Health Department
Ralston James Jr., Regional Coordinator DSWC
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

r �
'1
,} N.C. BN -1
T-,'. O
& NATURAL 1'ai"Jw 5
NOV ? 4 1995
DIVISION OF UNIRMANTAL !ti!pSPM00'(
MOOREMLE•NEIMMAL-OFFICE A -
.-�_
a

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY
PRIORITY
3
SAMPLE TYPE
LOCATION:
I
l
RIVER BASIN
❑AMBIENT
❑
❑
❑
REPORT TO; ARO FRO
RRO WeRO W1R0 WSRO TS
QA
STREAM
EFFLUENT
AT BM
❑ COMPLIANCE
❑ CHAIN
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
Other
- V - -
OF CUSTODY
"!�r D% r i f
i I'�0 r r
Fnr I_ah Ilce ON1_Y
lab Number: [[11 [�� W 6O
Dale Received:`"1 Time!
_ t
Recd by: From: Bu ourle Hand Del c
DATA ENTRY BY:'1i Vti C_1t f
DATE REPORTED: I
Shipped by: Hu ourler tall, Other
❑ EMERGENCY
❑ ESTUARY
3
COLLECTOR::�{S): LL
LOCATION:
J/�) ro�j T/��,/�+��___
Pheophytln a 32213 09/1
Estimated BOD Range: 0 5/5-25/25-65/40-134
140 plu STATION ��5%�
]i1 __'
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
Seed: Yes ❑ No� Chlorinated: Yes
No�REMARKS: ,�[� tP 1 5
�(�I'1v+ - ��1�• Aa7A✓ m�7 L? r' (JJi7iY1
7
Station #
Datt�e Begin (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin Date End
Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type
A }i L
Com osite
S B
Sample
C;
Ty e
G N x X
- V - -
10
"!�r D% r i f
i I'�0 r r
11
Phenols 32730 u9/1
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
12
2
'
COD High 340 mg/I
3
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Pheophytln a 32213 09/1
Colltorm: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
P: Dissolved as P 666
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /IOOml
7
Cr{:hrontium:Total1034
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
8
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Residue: Total 500 mgA
9
Pb -Lend 1051
Volatile 505 mg/l
10
uqA
Fixed 510 mg/l
11
Phenols 32730 u9/1
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
12
ug/I
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Ca-Calclum 916
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
ug/I
PH 403 n/r units
15
can Stream Depth It.
Acidity to pH 4.5 436r mg/1
16
480
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
36
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
35
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 m9A
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
N}13 as N 610 .2e
Chloride 940 mg/l
TKN as N 625 /20O `
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/l
P: Total as P 665 QQ
Pheophytln a 32213 09/1
PO4 as P 70507 T _
Color: True 80 if—C.—
P: Dissolved as P 666
Color-.(pH ) 83 ADMI
Hg -Mercury 71900
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
CA -Cadmium 1027
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Cr{:hrontium:Total1034
Fluoride 951 mg/l
Cu -copper 1042
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
NI-Nlckel 1067
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Pb -Lend 1051
Hardness Total goo mg/1
Specific Cored. 95 uMhos/cm2
Zn -Zinc 1092
uqA
MBAS 38260 mg/I
300 .
Phenols 32730 u9/1
ug/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
ug/I
Sulfide 745 mg/I
ug/I
Ca-Calclum 916
mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037
ug/I
Fc iron 1045
N}13 as N 610 .2e
mg/1
TKN as N 625 /20O `
trig/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
mg/1
P: Total as P 665 QQ
tng/1
PO4 as P 70507 T _
mg/1
P: Dissolved as P 666
mg/1
Hg -Mercury 71900
uq/r
CA -Cadmium 1027
ug/1
Cr{:hrontium:Total1034
USA
Cu -copper 1042
ug/I
NI-Nlckel 1067
USA
Pb -Lend 1051
ug/I
Zn -Zinc 1092
uqA
10 "`
300 .
Ag -Sliver 1077
ug/1
AI -Aluminum 1105
ug/I
Be-Berylllum 1012
ug/I
Ca-Calclum 916
mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037
ug/I
Fc iron 1045
ugA
Li -Lithium 1132
ug/1
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/I
Mn -Manganese 1055
ug/1
Na-Sodlum 929
mg/1
Arsenic:Total 1002
ug/1
Se-Selenlum 1147
ug/l
Hg -Mercury 71900
uq/r
Organochlorine Pesticides
Orgar:ophog1mrUs Pesticides
?�0
c
Acid Iletbicides
Base/ Neutral Fxlractable Organics
Weld Extraetabie Organics
10 "`
300 .
400 •
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
82243 82242 _
20
Salinity %
Precipltion On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Phytoplankton
Stream Flow Severity
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mg/1
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
?�0
c
2
94
10 "`
300 .
400 •
82244 431
82243 82242 _
20
Salinity %
Precipltion On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbldity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth It.
Stream Width It.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DMI)
COUNTY
_ PRIORI Y
SAMPLE TYPE
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 O
RIVER BASIN
AMBIENT ❑
❑
❑
REPORT TO: ARO FR
R RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS QA
STREAM
EFFLUENT
AT SM
❑COMPLIANCE ❑
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
Other
CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
Fnr Lab Ifae aNi.V .rl
Lab Number:
Date Received: Tint
Recd b From: Bu Lourie and Del
DATA ENTRY BY: 77L ­ Cl.
Shipped by Bu auric , Stntt, Other ❑EMERGENCY LJ ESTUARY DATE REPORTED: �,_
COLLECTORS)
Estimated BOD Range: 019—/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
��/STATION LOCATION: L� !, j! tJ� G yl�, PA, • ��C�-
Seed: Yes ❑ No.Or Chlorinated: Yea ❑ Nola REMARKS:
Station # Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Hegln Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value l'y a Composite Sample TT
D A H L T S B C GNXX
1
2
1
BOD5 310 3 mg/I
COD High 340 mg/I
3
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 O
COD Low 335 mg/I
4
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
P: Dissolved as P 666
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Cr-Chrunitum:Total 1034
Coliform. Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
8
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Pb -Lead 1051
Volatile 505 mg/I
101
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Ag -Silver 1077
Residue: Suspended $30 mg/I
12
Sulfate 945 mgA
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Co -Cobalt 1037
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
ug/i
pH 403 _�— units
15
can Stream Depth It.
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
480
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
136 11351
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
135 164
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mgA
20
Turbidity 75 NTU
N113asN610 O 73
Chloride 940 mg/I
TKN as N 625 9
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 O
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
P: Total as P 665 tJ
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
PO4 as P 70507
Color: True 80 Pt Co
P: Dissolved as P 666
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Hg -Mercury 71900
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cd -Cadmium 1027
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Cr-Chrunitum:Total 1034
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Cu{:opper 1042
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
NI -Nickel 1067
Grease and 011s 556 mg/I
Pb -Lead 1051
Hardness Total 900 mg/1
Zn -Zinc 1092
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
10
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Ag -Silver 1077
Phenols 32730 ugA
Ai -Aluminum 1105
Be -Beryllium 1012 -
Sulfate 945 mgA
Ca -Calcium 916
Sulfide 745 mg/1
Co -Cobalt 1037
ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 -
ug/i
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity MAi
N113asN610 O 73
mgA
TKN as N 625 9
mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 O
mg/1
P: Total as P 665 tJ
mg/1
PO4 as P 70507
mg/1
P: Dissolved as P 666
mg/1
Hg -Mercury 71900
ug/l
Cd -Cadmium 1027
ugA
Cr-Chrunitum:Total 1034
ug/1
Cu{:opper 1042
ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067
ug/1
Pb -Lead 1051
ug/I
Zn -Zinc 1092
ugA
10
3002 +
Ag -Silver 1077
ugA
Ai -Aluminum 1105
Be -Beryllium 1012 -
ug/I
ug/1
Ca -Calcium 916
mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037
ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 -
ug/i
Li -Lithium 1132
ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/1
Mn -Manganese 1055
u9/1
Na -Sodium 929
mg/1
Arsenic:Total 1002
ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147
ug/l
Hg -Mercury 71900
ug/l
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organoph0st)1101`115 Pesticides
Acid I Imbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
10
3002 +
400 1
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
82243 J82242
20
Salinity R
Precipition Wday)
Cloud Cover %
Phytoplankton
Stream Flow Severity
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mg/I
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH 8.3 pli 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
4
2
94
10
3002 +
400 1
82244 431
82243 J82242
20
Salinity R
Precipition Wday)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity MAi
can Stream Depth It.
Stream Width ft.
480
145
132
136 11351
11350
135 164
r 4

For Lab Use ONLY
DIV151014 OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DMI)
COUNTY
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TY P`E
Depth DM DB DBM
RIVER BASIN
Composite
rJ(
9S 27
IJ •DD
jEj�A:MBIENT QA
❑
�j STREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO FR MR RRO WaRO WiRO WSRO TS
T S B
c' G GNXX�
Cr-Chromium:Total1034
AT BM
❑COMPLIANCE ❑ CHAIN
❑ LAKE
❑ INFWENT
Other
OF CUSTODY
Residue: Total 500 moll
9
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
❑ £M£ftGENCY
ESTUARY
Ag -Silver 1077
Shipped by: Bus o er, Staff, Other
11
Sulfate 945 moll
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
Lab Number.•
Date Received: Time:
Recd by- From:B -Courier- and Del
DATA ENTRY BY: 174-t,(
DATE REPORTED. j a).aAk
COLLECTORN:
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/525 /40-130 or 100 plus?,/STATION LOCATION:_ �� ' ��� m 61 Z_1,1 �
Seed: Yes ❑ Nol;,/Chlorinated: Yes ❑ N.2 REMARKS:
Station # Date Begin iyy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Date End
Time End
Depth DM DB DBM
a
Composite
Sample T c
9S 27
IJ •DD
P: Dissolved as P 666
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom]
5
IV&Iue'l'
A H
T S B
c' G GNXX�
1
Chloride 940 moll
BODS 310 407 p34 mg/1
Clmoll
2
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
COD High 340
3
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/l
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
P: Dissolved as P 666
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom]
5
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Collform: MF Total 3I504 /looml
6
Cr-Chromium:Total1034
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /Iooml
7
Formaldehyde 71880 mull
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom]
8
Pb -Lead 1051
Residue: Total 500 moll
9
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
Volatile 505 moll
10
Ag -Silver 1077
Fixed 510 moll
11
Sulfate 945 moll
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
12
Ca -Calcium 916
Volattle 535 moll
13
ug/I
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
Stream Depth It.
PH 403 415— units
1 rJ
480
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 moll
16
36
Acidity to pit 8.3 485 mgA
17
35
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 moll
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 moll
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
NH3 as N 610 2
Chloride 940 moll
TKN as N 625 /f
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/l
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
P: Total as P 665
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/l
PO4 as P 70507
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
P: Dissolved as P 666
Color:(PH ) 83 ADM1
Hg -Mercury 71900
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cd -Cadmium 1027
Cyanide 720 nig/l
Cr-Chromium:Total1034
Fluoride 951 moll
Cu -Copper 1042
Formaldehyde 71880 mull
Ni -Nickel 1067
Grease and Oils 556 moll
Pb -Lead 1051
Hardness Total 900 mg/I
Zn -Zinc 1092
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
10
MELAS 38260 mg/f
Ag -Silver 1077
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Al -Aluminum 1105
Sulfate 945 moll
Be-Beryilium 1012
Sulfide 745 mg/I
Ca -Calcium 916
moll
Co -Cobalt 1037
ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045
ugA
NH3 as N 610 2
uy/1
TKN as N 625 /f
moll
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
m9A
P: Total as P 665
mg/I
PO4 as P 70507
mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666
moll
Hg -Mercury 71900
ug/1
Cd -Cadmium 1027
ugA
Cr-Chromium:Total1034
ugA
Cu -Copper 1042
ug/1
Ni -Nickel 1067
ug/1
Pb -Lead 1051
ug/I
Zn -Zinc 1092
ug/I
10
300 1 • 1
Ag -Silver 1077
ug/1
Al -Aluminum 1105
ug/l
Be-Beryilium 1012
ug/1
Ca -Calcium 916
moll
Co -Cobalt 1037
ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045
ugA
Li-Lithlum 1132
uy/1
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/I
Mn -Manganese 1055
u9/1
Na -Sodium 929
my/!
Arsenic:Total 1002
ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147
rag/I
Hg -Mercury 71900
ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
OFganophospimtus Pesticides
r
Acid IImbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
10
300 1 • 1
400 If
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Preclpition (In/day)
Cloud Cover %
Phytoplankton
Strearn Flow Severity
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. moll
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
PH 8.3 pH 4.5
pl l 4.5 pH 8.3
r
2
94
10
300 1 • 1
400 If
$2244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Preclpition (In/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction 0)eg)
Strearn Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/Hcan
Stream Depth It.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351 J1350
35
64
4
i

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
?ie_ur.tvre or print all Information tl; at Joe, nuc rejuire n skmzwjr,
'�NSF"tii�,_or New or Expanded (pleasecircleone)
-
General Information: ,
Name of Farm: LA2�Q�Z� ��ciiit No:
Sara Owne:(s) game: ��E P_c�,.LQ Phone.`o
tyo j `tailing .-.L.,eSS: 1�.''���%VJ 7171 3
�►1 F:rr.7t Lac:.:nn: �� v LPv�, r�,.� ut!nr: Fur -.n is located in: --
r
r
?� i.3tir!de and Longitude. cg0 Inter&-,wr:
P!. -as.- a cups ot• a county marl map with loco: -Xn identified and desc:ice beiow ($z su-:: ic: road
names. dir=_:ions. m"e:!cst...►e:c.l: /� e f �/
f -a.k i. I s� / 4- A � f1Z ,-4.a � J +1 J Lit3 141'
A �/1 !� � / i! . V. A At)
Operation Descriodon:
%.,7e of Swire • Xo..0j.'A :irnais
n wean to =tcder -
� -eerie::o =:nish
_J Farrow to `�C=
s -'-'arrow to =z-cler
.1 Farrow to Finish
Gilts
:i Boars r
_ l: �t ��f r�Orrilr•: No. 0l Anhrcis
.: Layer -
„ .trier s
Other FNpe of L;vetroe&:
Tx?e of Caute No. 4f .,riepicI r
Dnir-• 2_6O
•\:Imher cf .Awtili a!s:
Fsparertfn; Operarton Only
Pre:foul Desi2r, Cseacir::: ` ' ; : ,4ddfiiorcf Desiv>< Csoctin. ~ %rsrl Deti7ir C.-6acirt:
1 ,
ACMee available for application:_ (0 • Required Acreage: lo 1
Number of La,uoris / Storage Ponds :_, Tocol Caeacity: 3 4 Cubic feet (ft')
are subs=.ace drains present on the farm: 'ITS or 0 (please circ:e one)
i
If YES. are subsurface driins present in the area cf the LAGOON or 5PRaY FIELD (please cErcle one)
111.IMFI 1i Y..M.i YIf Mao iM191eM;Y.A Y1AAr M}I TiN�.LAF�a+aanY41\M.tw MlV liw M........... .......
Owner / `Ianaaer Anreement
I (,ye) ven[v tliat ail -the ybove information is txrrect and will be updated upun chan, il1_,. I we: understand the rce^ti4n
and maintenance,�pro� educes esmbiishe'l in the approved animal waste mana^_e:nent plan fur the farm named at+ove anti vi:l
implement these procedures. I (we) ;r;ow that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste tree atnzant and
storage system -or, cons tncLion -ot .nm.:v_Jaci1ities_wi_ll, reyuire.'a new cerutication to be submitted• to 'the Divisior. of
Etivirunmental i`lanagerr.,r rt befor" tt t new" animals are stocked. I (we) understand thai there' must be no disc:large of
artimai waste' from the itoraga 'or ,application systern to surface waters of Lbe state either directly through a' marl -made
conveyance or rrom a storm event less- severe than the '_S•year, .24-hour storm Ind there must not be ruii7oft':from flit
application of ttnimal� waste.. .i hoc):,unaenzand-that-ruri-off of po!inta a Prodi lounging ani ­ hinny. use: areas 'must be
minimized using technical standards'devewpod 5wtbe Natural Resources Conservation Service. The appruved plan will be
riled' at the fast and at the nfrlce of tbe.lzxal .Brill and, Water Cunservadon District. I (we) know that arty mctiification
must be approved by. a tecbnical specialist and submitted to the Soil and eater Conservation District prior to
implementation. a cSanee in land ownership requires written notification to DELI or a new certification (it' the approved
plats is changed) Gvitbin 60 tfays�oi.a:title trinsfen,
Name of Land O.vner :
Signature: Date:_ -&4 a
Name of Manayer(if differt—nt.,from bwnQ-: )-
Si;nature: Date:
.kWC -- august 1. 111`1

Technical Specialist Certification
L M a :LC;tnkai )peCialiSL t!tsignated by the 4oreh Carolina Soil and Water Commission pursuant to JCA
`C. -',C or .AGO=. 1 c:.^.:ey that dee animal was;e manage ncnt s,stzrn for ute farm n:%reed abuve :i;:s an animal waste
management plan that mems Or VCe.ttd SLUdards and ice-Jwcations of L`:e Divis;un of l:nvironntemal Managtrne:tt
(DEW) as speciiied in 15A NCAC 314.4217 and the 1:SDA-:�4awral Resourc.s Conse::'atiun Srr-.ic: (-NRCS) and!A�.r the
Nonh Carolina Soil and water Canservadon Commission pursuant to 13A `CAC 2H.0217 and 14A NCAC 5F .00O1 -
.004J. i he following t!e:nents are included in tete plant as applicable. While each cate_or;: dtsign_tes :t technical specWist
who may sign each ce:[Iflca(iUn (SD. Si. WL?. , RC. 1). the te-:., tical specialist should only certif': ;aru for which thev -_
tC: 1niCallY competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection. Lome. Treatment Svstern
Check rh= approprfard box
Existing tacility without re: Afit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation c_ractty: :corn-ge capability ^t •.%ita waste unlizatic-n
rp4uircment5.
New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such ss but not limited to collc::tiun systems. lagoons and ponds.
bave beet designed to aie.t or e[ce.&d the minimum stan,lazds aitd ;peci;tuatiuns.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
A117 _ Coneie:ed: iZ� C z U t 9 R
Address (Aaencv.): Z 7 Z
Sisnature:.
hone N0.:_ -7Q--4 -to�(ob41
'at':- Z --I - zc�rSZ
B) Land_Apulication Site (WUP)
"ire plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of lard for wazte utilization; chosen c.op is
suitable for waste managernent: hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): --F�
Affiliation - Date Wurlt Completed:
Address (Mency): Phone Nig.:
Si, -**nature: Date:
C) Runoff ConLrols from Exterior Lot
Cheep the appropriart box
-OMO" l=;zlity without exteritar lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility dors not contain any exterior lots.
D Facility wi(h exigriorl (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by `-RCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ." iZy� is t DI e2
.�ttthatitin A - M PICAS Date \Vor Comple.,!d:
.a.dcir!ss (Aa ncv Z? 7- Q, O O ?—I> Phone No.: 70!-{�;17- l(oOH
SiJrtature:A4.1 ale %t ' 7- ! Dace: Z" 7- ZooO
� «' C •- .-%u:-use 1. 1997 1.

M. Application and H_andlin� Equipment,
C,:ec.: the appropr,rre ho.t —
C.' _�t111�, �r C Pln ine 11i�;1lty u'i(h ±:15t1nQ'.tlSi�_1Pi'EI� 1I_Ln_�_Lr11Pf 1�, f,WU? or il
Animal -,vase aopiicauun equtomcnt specit"Led in the plan has been e: ':c: :W!d :aliuraWd or e': aluat.d
accordant. Lvith existing design charts and tables and is able to apply Waste as nccessar;" to accomrcdate t
::ase manage-ment plan: (existing aeciieation equipment can cover the area required by tbt plan at Mures not to
exceed either the scez"ned hvdrauiic cr nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of appiicatiens has heel
estaclisheJ: recuired buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjusLnnd:nt quidan,- -,,e c.:maired 3 rant of
,. a plan t.
D `v.v_'x:)nde'J. nr e'!i;tinq facilitti''.`''itl..nijt e`!ktlno w-iste 3rHic1tinn e-auinment for !rrviti r.
Animal waste application tquipme^.t iet.ified in ;be pian has been desi_aed to aeot.y -ante as necessary to
accommcdate the management plan: (proposed application equipment tan cover Site arca required by L�e
plan at rates not to excttd either Ste speciricJ hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a ichedule for ti,min2 or.'
applicatiuns has been esablished::e•quired buffers can be maintained: c2iibnWon and adjustment vj;t rand aye
cuntained as part of die plan).
s: Lgw e".zirided. nr ±'! ,dng fnc;jic 'M IOU[ ylzi'ngyv,, LC aUlit nLuJ:rnS;!1t 6,r jLr t!,a no( lish e
krr:t•,- irri�!:ttion, 0VUP
.Animal wa5tt appiicsdon equipment specitied i.-, the plan has been se'e.ted to apply waste as rte.essarr: to
accommodate the waste management pian: (proposed application equipment can corer the area required b% t.':e
Flan at rates not to txce.d eichtr Lhe specified nydrnuft or nutrient loading rites: a schedule for U -mine of
applications bas been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration anti adjustment 3'sidance art:
cortnined as Fart of the plan).
\ame.of Technical Specialist (Eease Print): [
Affilia(ion. USS P, - K -2C S Date «'ori Corttcte:ed:_Z - 7 _00
Address (Aaencv): Z 7 1 I Z (o � orle No. 704 fo � 7 -160 �
Signature: Date: 2 J -06�
E) Qdor_Controi. Insect Control. `lortality'Ylanaeement and Etner2encv action Plan (SD.
ST. %V P. RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Ntanagernertt Odor Control Checklist. an Insec:
Control Checklist. a Mumality Management Checklist anti an Emergencv Ac,iun Plan. Sources of bold oc ors and
insects, have been evaluated with respect to t!?is site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Manaeemem Practices to Control Insets have been selected and included in the wasm management plan. Both the
Mortality N(anagement Plan and the Emergency action Plan are complete and can bitimpleatented by this facility.
-Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): � ' �c +� 1 12 ,u
AffiliationC,.SD Mus - TJX
Address (Aoe
Signature:
Date Wor k Compie:e:i: Z- ?_
Phone No.:„704 L& 7 j LL4
Date: Z - 7 -041
F) Written `Notice of riesv or Expanding Swine Farm
The fallo��ing signature block is only to be used for new or e. anding s%yine farms that b yin construction offer lune
21. 1996. If the facility was built before lune -11. 1996, whe ,rat it cnrtstructed or Inst.
etpanded
I (we) certify that f (wet have attempted to contact by ct:zi td mail all adjoining property a��ne:s and all propz.^.1 owners
ubo own property located across a public road. stre'�c or tghway from this new or expanding seine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirenteits of vCGS IQ6- A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached, n �
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
dame or Manager (if L:irl.r2:lt frory/okvnen:
Date:
Si;nature: Date:
.AWC •- Au,ust i, 1997 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Stora^e. Treatment Installation
NeW. eXpanded +;r retro6tied Iac:iity (Sl)
Animal Waste storage and trcaunent strictures. iuc�, as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have he.n irstai+ed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or :zc:ed we minirnum standards and specifications.
For ezisrirrg facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessam.
\erne of Techniepi $peciaiist (Please Print):
?.i;iiiation_J _ U�p �,-�Pc Date Work Completed: 2- 7 -CO
L7 Z T -C. 0i— D 0 N( 0 e j �7�
Address (�gPrtcv): is A 1 c Z 8 r4 G Phone `o.:_t0a-X37- ! (vUg
SiJndttfre: Date: z- 7-0a
B) Land Apolication Site (NVUP)
Check the approprrnre bat
The cropping syst::n is in place on J1 land as specified in the animal waste mana_zement plan
Condirionai Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting: the cropping system
as Specified in the waste utilization pian has net been establis+`ted and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by _ (monuVdayiyear); the proposed cove: crop is
appropriate for compliance %Lith the wasteutilizabon plan,
:a Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 0 days
of this certitic3tion. the owner has committed to establish 3n interim crop for erosion control:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):^­E�Z"g :Fn -i L.>. ,P—,
Mi7tliatio
.address (
Signature
Completed: Z — 7 - cO _
Phone No. l aA •te 3
Date: 2-7 -ov
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization pian.
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit to DEMI a verificadon of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the slate specified in the conditional certification. E (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of We waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action froth DEM.
'Nance of Land Owner:
S i;nature: Date: _
Name of Manager (if dizferem from owner):
Signature: Date:_
A%N'C -- Awzubt 1. 1997

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
1= c:ilcv with exte-rior lots
tU n::ntniizt file run oft of ; ullutsnti i, Urn lounpn? and !1C.' vy use :IG,'.i title': tt=n as i��•';ilt;i
Ill ::�t pian.
Forfiac:Iiries wirhour exterior fors.. no cerufrcarfon Is necessar:.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print),
Affiliatior: Date fi'v'er: C3rrl ieted:
Address (Age, -c.:):
Pune No.:
Sh2n.acure- Dat'.
D) A olication and Handling Ecluioment installation (NVUP or I)
Check :he appropriare nicc.l
-\nimal wast application and handling equipment in u6it- ; ian is o:: site. anti renjy for use:
caiicrrtiau and adjustment materials have beta providej mu t:tt owners =d are contained as part of tilt plan..
J Aninial -vaste application and handling equipment in tn,: plan :la> not <<'.;1 iniLnllej but Uic kvwne-
has proposed leasing or third party applic dun and tl:u provided a signet contras:: equipment spt�:iried in
the contract agrees wide til_ reyuiremems of the plan: required buffers can br maintaineti., calibration and —
adiusunent guidance have been provided to the Owners and ue contained as part of the plan.
.D Conditional approval: Animal waste application and hLmd!ins equipment specified in the plan has
been purc5aaed and will be on site and installed by (montdld:v/yearj; there is adequate
storage to hold the w;ute until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance tivim :he cropping system contained in the plan: and c1li.` radon and adjustment 211idance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of Lhe plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (P?ease Print): . �G� �E2—
-affiliation USD p, - Date `Vora Comple ed: 4-7-00
Address (Aa _icy z ch,10 b 2,1 1Co Phone No. log (o3 '7-r(ooy
Signature: -E,_ .� -- Date: 7-7-00
The follo%vin; signature blocs: is only to be used rvhen tete box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) c.—.-dN that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling quipment as
specified in my (our) ►waste management plan and Will s:ibrnit to DEyt a v-e:iriration of deliver: and installation
from a Technical Specialist within l: calendar da}'s followine the taste specified in the condidonal certitieadon. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this vee^:lication is a violation of the waste manapmem plata acid will subie,: me
(us) to an enforceme tic action from DE.I.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from o%vner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. insect Control and Mortality Man2t!e.nent (SQ. Si. SV 'P. RC or 1)
dUlods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. Tne
mortality management system as specified in the Plast has also be -.n installed and is operational.
Name of Techrdeal Specialist (Please Print):- �+Z l E 2
Affiliation JSD N - Q 2X -.S Date 1Vork Com ple::d: -1-o©
Address (Agencg A. to 21=e No.: -1x37 1 lon4
Signature:
AWC Aw4usr 1. 1997
Date: Z-7-00 .

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health. and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 2953:
Raleigh, tiC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form aloe; with the complete :animal Waste
Mana;ement Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a cope
in your files with your .animal Waste N lanaeement Plan.
AWC -- Aut-ust I. 199

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
CIA..
Sherri Evans -Stanton, Acting Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
GERALD FOSTER
LA -FOSTER FARM
13210 COOL SPRINGS ROAD
CLEVELAND NC 27013
Dear Mr. Foster:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL R-50URCES
aMrMONMENT, HEALTR
b NATURAL. RE OURCE9
January 29, 2001
JAN 26 2011
AC1 Df 01==X, 9AIL46lI®-1
Subject: Certificate of CoM Nom.-`AW�C-7800025
La -Foster Farm (Foster Road)
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
In accordance with your application received on October 23, 2000, and additional information
response received December 28, 2000; we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to
Gerald Foster, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. This approval shall consist of
the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the La -
Foster Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 200 Dairy cows and
the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC800025
La -Foster Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and.
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Theresa Nartea at [phone] ext. 375.
Sincerely,
4(; --Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Rowan County Health Department
cMooresville-R_egional:Office;_W. ,ater_Quality-Section- --
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
January 24, 2001
MEMORANDUM
TO: Future Reviewers
FROM: Theresa Nartea, Soil Scientist H
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
RE: 80-43 and 80-25 facilities
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
To avoid future confusion regarding these two facilities, 80-43 and 80-25, please note that they
are two individual dairy operations, owned by the same farmer but in different locations. The
farmer wants to have the correspondence for both farms sent to the mailing address, since they do
not live at either of the two farms.
The mailing address is:
132I0 Cool Springs Road
Cleveland, NC 27013
Facility 80-43 is located on Carson Road and is certified for 500 dairy cows.
Facility 80-25 is located on Foster Road and is certified for 200 dairy cows.
Due to confusion in the review for 80-25, the Foster's were contacted on January 19, 2001. They
verified that these two farms are different and distinct. They should not be combined and they
have different locations and do not share the same waste management systems.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

' State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORA1 MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information ori fire with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any correctithat are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete am- est as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered. ,
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: La -Foster Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Gerald Foster
1.3 Mailing address:
W
City, State: Cleveland NC Zip: 37013
Telephone Number (include area code): 704-278-2596
1.4 County where facility is located: Rowan
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Iredell Cool Sprinas Rd. (SR 1003) to Foster
Rd. SR 1973) turn [eft go approx. 1 1/4 miles on left of road.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation:
19 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 80� (county number); _25 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Cattle operation
Iron -airy
55- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? =yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Laver
0 Farrow to Wean (i# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to.Feeder (n sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (9 sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
FORM: AWO-G-E 717199 Page 1 of 4
80-2s
0 Dairy
0 Beef
No. of Animals:

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 275.00 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 132
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy ol' the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations:
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where, animal waste is land applied.
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CA WIMP must include the following components. Some of these components mm! not
have been required at the time the facility ,u -cis certified but should be added to the
C.4W11P for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3. 3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.4 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
x.3.10 A site schematic.
.).3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3. l2 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method. noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 717199 Pabe 2 of 4 80-25
Applicants Initials

Facility Number: 80 - 25
Facility Name: La -Foster Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to The best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be retumed to me as incomplete.
Signature
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land O�,sner)
/ /A
(Manaeer's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE. INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 717199 Page 3 of 4 80-25

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (1/18)
�.sbevilie Regional WQ Saper isar
C9 Fv oodfin Pia=
Asheville, NC 75801
.(szg) 231-6208
Fax (e'=g)25I-6452
Aver Mamma
Buncombe MamSon
Bim.:
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitcbcll
Cb=k-
Polk
Clay
Rutbe-dord
fss-a-�' =
Swain
Maywood
Transyivanis
Henderson Yan=y
Jack
Fave_teville Regional WQ Su= -=ism
W;zhovia Building, Suite 714
Fav=--vill_, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Arson
Moore
Bladca
R.ichnand
C'Z=bciaad
Robeson
F -C=
Sa=son
Hoir-
s=d and
4icatgotaery
Wilk=
W mstom-Salon Regi c=4 WQ Supcvirrr
585 Waughtawn Strom
W to -mn-Salta, NC 27 1(77
C-aQ 771-4600
Fsx wL) n14S1
A1amaa=
RocbrZhum
Allcghaay
Randolph
Asir
5tok=
Cn-well
Story
Davidson
Watauga
Devic
Wilk=
Fasy1h
Yadkin
Gmiford
wuhingtoa Regional WQ Saa=visor
943 Washington Square Mill
Washing=, NC 27889
(a5z) 946-61,81
Fax (; 975-3716
Bcrtie - Lenoir
Cbowaa
Pamlico
Caves
Pas=o=k
C=rimci
P ---q s
Dare
Pitt
Crams
Tyre1
ewe
Washington
Herzfoxd
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Savcvisar
919 North Main Su
Mocres-�Uc, NC 28115
(704) 56:-1599
Fax (104) -&-A-0
A ex 4-
Lincoln
Cabatrus
Me;ki=b=Z
Catawba
Rowan
t3eveiand
Staaly
Gasusc
Union
lrrlel
-
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 4 of 4
Raleigh R4u al WQ Sq= --v cs
38x0 Bay Dr.
Ucigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Fix [phone]
Chatham Nash
D=b mt Nae". - . : _+ton
Edgezotnbc 0,-m=ge
Franklin Pin
Crranviile Van=
Halifax Wak_
3obnz= Wm==
Lee WEE=
Fr Un ng= Regim WQ Str—visor
12-7 Cardinal Dn vc .ExL=sion
Wilmingma. NC 2-W5-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Bntrswick New H=vc
Carte - Oaslow
Calumbas F-_xk--
Duplin

Animal Waste Managrement Plan Certification
( Please r: ce or print all inCvrm.ition that does not reuuire a siglnatur�! i
�clstln_ of N. ew or 'Expanded -( lease circle one) 1
General Information-
Nan
nformation:
N :le of Fain: L A - Fy,S � ,Fd? l A � Z•1 Fac;iity tin: O -- Z _
�32Lrtb� Owne-(s) Name:_C��P�,LQ _ �T�0 p:lone N'o: U!s Q7��5�a
CPO ( Mailing .-'..:dress:in: A'.Al r
)\3 G7 Of 3
d j6A1W ; ;arm Loco::or:: CCS F V ELPA D , r\,� ' ot_ru m is lac:lte'i x K
P . Far
1r
Nt4 • atlCLaZ and L oR�?L'uCz: C7b � lnLegrawC:
Pease ch a cuov o'L _1 cotlncy road map wick. Zl;c':tic:n identified and desc:lbe bZiow (Be spe, .tic: Coad
na!i?es. d;r�_:ions. irnilecost. e:c.): F d eA2
oE�T� 'h rQ1 t �rnlr ..
0aeration Descriotion:
r :pe of Swire NO. ofAuiurrais F;;ae :j �ottitr — Na. o(Anbra s Free of Caale Vo. of.Arbirals
Wean to . iter Laver "ADair;. 2.00
=__der to . inisiz a puile:s J Bee:
:I Farrow to Wean
D Farrow to r
r=ow to Finish Otiter Type of L;:es:ock: ":itnr,er of.,nirn�;s:
Gilts
3aars
��rendinQ Oper-sruii-Only
?re:zotrs rJest�r.: 'aaczr'.: Addiriorai DrsiYn C:.'accrt� i'oral Desi7,r C.; acfri:'
.crease .available for application: _ � � �o • � Requires! .acreage- lot
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds:_ I Total Capacity: 3 (07V Cubic; Feet (ft')
.-re subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or 0 (please circle one)
Lf YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAG 00N or SPR-XY FIELD (please circle one)
it%MM}t%f... .....%al%%wwa.x%%%M...lM%%ai new%%Maltyf.w%ww%at...........
%wYil%w%i1w:�aa as%w%w
Owner / `lana;er A;reetnent
I (-e) verify chat all the above information is cur,ect and will be updated upein Oan_im=. I (we) understand the opemliun
and maintenance proc.-aures established in the approved animal waste mina^ --talent plan for the farm n=its! above and will
implement these proct-dures. I (we) know that anv expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new ce utication to be submitted to the Division of
cnvirunmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there trust be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or appiicadun system to surface waters o[ the state either directly throuQh a man-made
conveyance or from a storm e%cnc less severe than the 25 -year. 24 -!tour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of poilumms, from lounging and heavy use areas must be.
minimized using technical standards de':e!uced by the Natural Rasources Conservation 5e: vice. The approved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservatdun District. I (ewe) know dlat arty medificadon
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and water Conservation District prior to
imalementadon. A chance in land ownership requires written nodfication to DELI or a new ee:tifieadun (if the approved
plan is changed) within 50 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner :
Signature:
Date: d ,� a
Name of .Manager(if diffe ent from oxn1:':
Signature: _ _ t' _ Date:
A%VC -- A u,ust 1. 1997 l'VA QUALITY SECTION _
Complianco Ent L 06 QoZ 3 �

Mar -06-00 02:36P Rowan SWCO.
.....r --r aWwu iJ. v :147-rid-th c0 ti
704 647--9714 P_02
DWQ Nth! DTSC1iARGE BR, PAGE 02/02
Technical Speciaii5t Certificatign
I. Ai i tet:na�cal spC:ialiSL Oeiianated 5v the `ordi C=Oioa Soil -=d este; Cun3ervatlern commission pursaartt to if A
NCAC 6i• .000-L. I ct teal drat Ot animal A ISM rt,aajet-�Vc SVVM M Fv the. fZM Inzd 3�uvd 11as all animal waste
Lr.anaaement p1w that dears or exceeds standards au: sut:_iticatic;ns of Lht ,7:�iSit?RIta Es:lrOnRl{Rtal `lanagemtnt
(DELI) as see:ifieu in 15A `CAC 2E-i'_02I and the C:50A' Na aral Resourc:s Con5a. -46un Vic^ it: {`SCS) ar►Lvur the
`crth Carolina.Soil and Watt.- CO(%SCC•adCn Co=n' iMion pursuant LO 15.E NCAC Z4.Q21+ and 14A ECAC 6F ,0001.
.0001. TU fotlQ.wino e!eInettts art included in Lie pla,i a3 acplicaoie. W hlle each cats desieaates a tec:lnical specialist
was tnav sign t�t:h cecuCcaaun (SI?. 5i. tvLY. RC. I). chs tc:`tnira. soe;:alist s'-euid Onl1.- certs(v zzr-z ccr which the•: are
ce::tnic�114 compe;t:ac � '
i
11. Certification of Design :
A) ollecrian. Stgrqne, Treatnien vsterrs
Cited: il:e apptopriate box i
ext t' n facil& with t1'st t it (5D or NVt'P)
SLnr'1Ie VOltrmt IS adC'gUate fot OPCMdOn itur^.tiC c1ouhilikv k;; -xidl w-o-stt utilltaticrt
NewL -1 ande-f or wroCitted iar.lity (SD)
Animal waste stufate and trmnem structurm such as but not limina! to .olttt::t C1 ,ti;trttls, ladO011s and Ponds.
have been deSiRntdAC Rte=t Or dZceed the miaittlur. it: J -L- is inn iFttltlurtiur. .
; ama of Tec'lnic31 Specialist (Please Print):
A;titistior + s A n 5Date Woc C rnpit:ed:_ 12.-7-0- t q q
AddceSs (k?n C( Z 7 2- C . c t^ oti`.ro r..;�_ �n ... P Cne ;\o.: r - (g32• r (o6y
Siznature: i�, i." 11:4-( Ca 1;"A'rN �
B) Land Application Site .(NYUP)
L'be pian 7rovides For min(muin separations (buifersl: ati•guate amount of lanki c'u 6vn,�tc utilitation: cuosel c:op is
suimble: for waste managemear. Sydno.Tic anti r.utricat lcauini rates.
`arae of Technical 5peciaii5t (Pie= ?rant): K
Affiliation 1 CS Dale Work
c 9 r & A,-
Addrzss (Agent: :
Siena(
C) Runoff Controis from Frterior Lots
Chick roe ep&prinre bv.t'
_M11- aOIL(v without eXmi rinr Intl (SO or SVUP 0r RQ
This tacility flocs not contain any exterior tuts.
�1
Faciliv., tvi tt t rin i (RC)
`ldtho'-ts to minunize tar vin off of polluta 5 from (our,ein! rad hravv use 7,;C:
accordance •.vitb tectnica! 5tarn.Layds developed by `•RCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Ptcase Past): 1-:S KU C
Atiiii�tiott cc W:)r C
5i�a1c4re: D
WC -- A4u4uwt t. 1997
moieted: — Zo—q
unz �o. �7D�-lQ 37,-j�2a�
.' :I� _ 00
have be_n designed in
fine No.. 20c --637- !(pot-•{
t,!: Z 7 -Zoon

Technical Specialist Certification
I. .a, a tec"Inical specialist de;isnated by the `oral Carolina Soil and Nater Conservation Commission pursuant to I_A
NCAC 6i= .GGO-. I ce'rtii;r that the animal waste mana_'emem systern for the farm nm-ned above has an animal tyaste
management plan that meets or e. -C. -:!ds standards and sue_ificntiuns of the Division of Environmental `lanagz.;te tt
(DEM) as sptcified in ISA :tiCAC 2H.0217 and the L:SDA-Natural Resources Conservation Se—r%ice ( LRCS) ant,vr the
North Carolina Soil and Nater Conservation Commission pursuant to 13A `CAC 2- .0?17 and l=A NCAC 6F .GGO1-
.0006. The following efe netts are included in the plan as avo icable. While each cate_cr;: designates a technical specialist
.vho may sign each c.;tiftcatiun (SD. SI. WL'P. RC. I). tL_ tec nical specialist should only ce;tii. pairs for which then
ae-. !nically comcete:tt.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment System
cher."'. he aDpropliate box
?7-- E.ristinQ Cacility without retrntic (SD or %V:P)
storage volume is adequate for operation caracay: iwrage cacahiki: c;.r.sistent -.vide wUs,e- utilization
21uir� rents. _
New. exnanded or rerrntitted Cac;lity (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to colle%:;ion systerns. la_luoa.j and ponds.
have beta designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards astd ;ce_iticatiuns.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): —�5�uC*- ��� n;~ F?
A.Ct;ii3tion U S A - LNJ __S _ Date Wor' Compie=ed: i z -Z o- 1999
Address (Aeancl& Z 7 Z 7-
$tanatur-0:
Phone No.: --70 4- 03-7-1 (,P641
Date: z - 7 - ZOOQ
B) Land Aoalication Site (WUP)
Tate plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land Cur waste utilization; chosei crop is
suitable for waste management: hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):'—R
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (?+pence): _ _ _ Phone . V:
Si�,nature: Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
Facility without exterior lots (SD or tyle P or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
J Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and ltrayv use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by tiRCS.
-Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
�itiiiation USD - l\i �c S Date WorkComole td:
Addrsss (Auric ZZ Z7- O 1 cZD erg Phone `'o.• 704 4 7-- RoOH
SiJnature: Data: Z - - ZOoo
AWC -- Auguht t. 191)e

=D). aodlicatinn and Hand[in- Eauinment:
C. -eat the approprrcre box
c�.rting or e~ylydina (ic.',Hcv with e:.is tn? ,.yiste inr°licacion e:iyiyment 4`VL : or 1)
.animal waste appiicauun equipment set titled in the. pian has been a:tter field ca.iibratt:d or e':aivac_d
accordance with exisunq desien charts and tables and is able to apply 'caste as necessar: to accomr.'.cdate t
waste management plan: (existin2 acolication equipment can cover the area r.qu red by the plan at ,:aces not to
taceed eitftcr the spec::ied hvdrauiic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for LLning of apciicacens has bee t
established. required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjus=d ;t Jui't ane! are c:.:ntained ;s part of
the plan).
\e -.v t=ended. nr e: %sting facility without existing ec+tincrent for <,rnv ir-igltitln. (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the pian bas be -,a desi ^.ed to acpiv waste as Ucessarf to
accommcdate the wast4 management plan: (proposed application equipment can coyer the area required by C- e
plan at rates not to exceed eithe: the specified 'ivdmulic or nutrient loading rates: a sche'L'ule for :iming of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: c:!4br.ttiun and adiusanea,t ?uidapcare -
cumained as part of the plan).
„r New. ornlnded _nf _� :ii�4 fnt tlll': Without �rtitenv wn5te 'tnnlicltinn culrnlcm t�)r !nnd.=�rreatlln? not rJ$[IS L
,pate ir„c16o . OVtrP or 1)
.neofetal waste application equipment specified in d:e pian has be_n se'.ecte:i cu aopty waste as necesssr: to
accommodate the waste management pian: (proposed appiicatson equip-ment can cover the area required by L e
plan at rates not to exceed either Ube specified hvdrsuiic or nutrient loading rates: a schadui= tt:r LLIing of
applications has been established. required buffers can be maintained: caHbrarrun and adiusLment ;•'_idance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name.of Technical Specialist (Plea.,ce Print):
.iii:liationyS D A - N2CS _ Date Wor Comcle:a : Z-7-00
.=�GerzsS (Agencv): Z7Z RIC> z Saiz e" hone \0.:__704 - (v37.16Gg
S[anatl:re: Dace: '2 7 —�
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. Mortality Manaaement_and Erner(Zency action Plan (SD.
SI. NVUF. RC or I)
t
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste klanagement Odur Control Checklist. an Insec:
Control Check list. a Nfurtslit-v Management Checklist and an Emengenc.., Ac: -.'un Plan. Sources of both o(:ors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Bast Management Practices to "Unimize Odors and Best
itlanagemem Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management pian. Both the
:`tonality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facilir:.
Lame of Technical Specialist (Please Print): JLC L cb=�,
Affili=On SD[�- ?�+�C_s Date Worti Completed: Z-1 -0
r
Address (Az IA -5 ua 1� Z-BI4 Phone'o.: 704 iSS7-dobe(
Sk-nature: Date: 7 -00
F} Written Notice of New or Etc andin Seine Farm
The following si,nature block is only to be used for new or e. adding swine firms that begin construction after June
21.1996. if the facility was built before June 21. 1996. whe was it constructed or IUSE
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by cerci ed mail all adjoining property owners and all propern owners
who owns property located across a public road. stre­t. or t_hway from dais new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in ccmcliance with the requirements of NCGS 1Q6- - a copy of the notice and a list of the ptopeny owners notified is
lie
Name
n \
\ame of Land Owner:
Signature:
:Name of Manager (if Giffe'e:1t fron}/owne ):
Date:
Signature: Date:
ANVC -- au --use 1. 1997 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
tie.v. e.�nanded i;r retroi7iaed facility (St)
Animal waste storage and treatme:tt Structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been inszrj, _d
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or esc.ed the minimum standards and specuications.
For e.risrin- facilities without rerrofits, no Cerriflearion fs necessar;.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_��L�£�- _
aff liaucin ._ _ V S D P Ir e c o Date Worti Comolz:zd: Z- 7 -�
L7 Z7- C- �- to O e D 0 7
i
a.deress (Aaencv): 5 to 1 ;<--Z S 14 G Phone No.: 704-157-14,C) -I
Signature:
B) Land Apolication Site (NVLP)
Check rhe appropriate box
Dstz: z- 7-oo
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste manage:meru pian.
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting: the c-epping system
a5 specified in the waste utilization plan has net been esm-biished and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (momh/dayiyear): the proposed cove; crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wastzudlizacion plan.
:1 Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within _0 cla;:s
of this cerutication. the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control:
lame of.Technical Specialist (Please Print):, -B.� >r —P, i t] E 2-
Al'tiliation-2S_D A - N Date Work Completed: Z-7-00
Address (Age A y). c Z7Z i o>� Tf'�
- _ P;, 4G__ Phone `o.:7i 0.4 -1o3Z- I (P 01/
Si,znature:
Date: 7-7-06
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan_
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for rrosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 13 calendar days following the bate specified in the conditional c.ttification. I (we) .
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violadon of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to art
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
game of Manager (if different from owne.*
Signature: Date:
AWC .- august t. 19W, A

C) Runoff Controls frorn Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with emizrior leas
%lC;.'luLk to mininlize the run off of puilut=:% from tuunsinz and hcav, use:,_%ns ti;lvc: bc=n :r.stnikc•' as ;prciri:l
ill dttC plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no cerrification is necessar.%
\ame of Technical Specialist (Please print):
Affiiiation Date Work- Camcle.?d:
Address (Agency): o^one No.:
Si�natur� Date:
D) Agolication and Handlinf* Eauioment installation (NVUP or I)
Check the appropriate bloc:ti
Animal waste application and handling equipme^t s� ecit'izd in uhf- : ian is e.:: site and re^.d;: for use:
caiibmUun and adjustment materials have teen provide-.! to [lie owners and are conmined :s e:ut of die plan.
J Animal ;,,•aste application and handling euuipnient spc.:tic! in c.w plan :las not hce:t in;t.'lllyd but tat siLvnt :
has propused leasing or third party application and h:t; provided a signed contr c:: equipment srecitied in
rhe contract agrees wide the requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintaincd: calibration and
adiustnlent ?uidance have bz_:i provided to the owners arca art ccntained as part of the Flan.
Z. Conditional approval: Animal waste application and hand!ina equipment speciticd in die plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by rmombhL�•/year n there is adequate
siora?e to hold the waste until the equipment is instailed and undi the waste can be land applied in
accordance wiL1 the cropping system Contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustaiem Quitlanc_ have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C)ies:C__R
At't'.Hadon USD
Z.7 2-7 =Z o��
:address (Aeppcv : S cS. b 0'z 1v e_
Signature:
_Date War. Completed: Z--7-0,:-)
Z8t4 (e, Phone .\o.: 704 - &3 7-1(o0q
Date: Z-7-06
The foil o%vin; signature block is only to be used when the box far conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste appiicztion and handling euuioment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEN't a venrication of delive:-. and installation
from a Technical Specialist within I= calendar days followinLl the. date speciried in the conditional ce:titicatian.. I
(we) realize that Failure to submit this.verfic»tion is a violation of the waste management plan and will sub_ie::: me
(us) to an enforcement -action from DE.M.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Date:
Name of .Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality hlana!!ernent (SD. SI. WUP. RC or 1)
:Ntediods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are ooer-4donal. The
mortality mariasement system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is opecadonal.
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print)- l a7 E 2
Affiliation �JS-D A - 1J 2-C-5 Date Work Comale:ed: z -7-00
Address (A2ency):1� 12�2i/ a�L l4 {d Phone No.:W-A-(P37-1(004
Sivnature:
aWC -- August 1. 1997
Date: ZJ7 - 0a

Please return the completed form to the Division of Nater Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Nater Quality
'Nater Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, `C 27626-053=
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete animal Waste
.Management Plan to the local Soil and Nater Conservation District Office and to keep a cope
in your files with Your _animal Waste Manazement Plan.
AWC -- .august I. 1997 6

1
Or
ROW
(�L ISJ�I� ITV SECT}0 f �. _ - F NOR
Q�iiu• CL_
z _
om Ranco En
eC P
n1�'5 r}Ct �j
lfa{1 V'•-` .Bei
A ', If :• i B CHURCH q4 f �i2
1fA, .
9ef 11/ •SOf/Tf/ RIVES / '�? S
0 CCTC IRISH FIRE DIST, j
1f7f ` r0�0J/
12 a in'"? 1 1f77
/ fe• /
e
/1JT ! rs I\\ :=7CH ne.
aa.
d,l 8p Nee mare,
lit
H!r ¢ Vernon OR, s
= A
h+aodleaf l nw
nn ff
uF• fEF
SO. 1aJX .1
! / CCCYELAIq 2 f Asol1 ''' Al
,R.FQ A!.!`ill% 1 I i
1177 �v V :e,ANrtA A.r.7._ /r 1+ i! .'qy"� r9lr 1d/F
qp •� ros7et.i �F � �� I ,
WEST R WAN FIRE DIST.
CLEVELAND,GODSrr
� i 19.9 rfS2 �
j
112: =a -Vol C EVEL. :93r "°..� Barber a� p'Fe9 r �t
WJ sou,
8 r.1 f
I i $'•AM4i Wr RrF. e`A,','~ ` L RED IeDNO�IL RORAN
FF R;'S7 RDN'S"i �* R
!7e 1 1772 rI, r`M�E Seim ^,,ref R�r• - MI'SCM.i A .,l,L �/ y¢� I 9 AFD'
/ �'91iy1 IE +4r4V RD "I R C \ 5�C1516 / 90 p 11111' ,r2/ilei
' I!!7 y !
R BEAR° O,P JR MT. ULL 1.1 I P
�F.D. � wq
1 r rA L Rp r!6' FIR�TEELw -� T%A + :
! f o f ♦I LOCKE FIRE GIS
t MT.�. �A I Bear 11 �' 1733 1C. �If�
x w t far
P
rl."1347
•04
J �, I2
r,cHr RD
,713 l7 i7 ._.— �, lllefp
Rte I' Sallyll,R, . a f !aa I
.le. Lr[ SII+
R
a.6.a. � :b ArQ. i
F'S 4 �yCMr l2 LJ Aii 116! C / RD Bo'J p Rl6 44
y i�LEW �• i p9 n v '�'
4 Mt ! "9F SCS+ i "� it xx ti :.., 1716 %,,,,t 7!1 f
6 ` ¢O' I C'tr 1169 I,N iJ.J RI.:
eel V I 1a ' 176! pa { 04,e RD 4
1
lLlillhr fifia Sr_wu .!1 9 len t„

Ur e." I .LU XO 0ICCUVl.r1 - WU r CL& - =I V- (10-oV;+o MPI G 1 V r 14. 10 t'. U.ZIU d
R_F,OYTEST FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
e follcrwing farm does not meek the 211 .0200 registration requirements. Please i
fac on the registration da tab"e. -
Facility ben — S
Farm Name:
Mailing Address: S
County:
This Operation is:
pasi-in a only (no confine nt)
city litter poult>'y ope on
out of busincssfna on
Closed out per S standards
-�he]avu-.the--thr hojd�l��th�
C:DMM
✓0
a liquid =i►nal waste-%nagcment's)rsrem)
I am fully awara at should the number of =i.mals iner
operation ract the 2H .0200 registration requirements
notify and re- Aster with the Division of Water Quality.
Si afillz'e:.,�F�
phase r cozmletai form to: DEHNR DWQ
Water Quality Section
Carripunce Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigl, NC 27625-0535
this
beyond the threshold limit or the
any reason, X will be required to
Date: -, q— C
k-4/97

Gerald Foster Dairy 80-25
W
6y
E

M
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Gerald Foster- La- Foster Dairy 1 154
Location: ., Cleveland, NC 27013 ) 3 a 1 D °� ! �' /"9s
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Dairy
Number of Animals: 200
(Dcsign Capacity)
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to
be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates,
leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons
per acre per year.. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters
which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab
for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. When
the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and 1 or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should
be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize
the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.
2

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
• A 200 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, W, tons, etc.)
200 animals x 21 (gal/day/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days time) = 1,495,200 gallons of
waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
200 animals x 76 lbs. N/animal/yr = 15,200 lbs. Total N
Total Nitrogen produced/yr. 15,200 lbs. Total N
(PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:
FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1
3

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your waste storage pond is designed for 90 days of temporary storage and the temporary
storage must be removed on the average of once every 3 MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of
96.5 . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
This operation has 716 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation will be a 2 year
system of corn cut for silage in the first year, followed by small grain cut for silage and sudex hay
in the second year. Nitrogen will be applied using a honeywagon to crops, based on the realistic
yields at the rates listed in table 1.
Timing and application rates will be as followed:
Corn silage: April -May at the rate of 150 Ibs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Sm. Grain silage: Sept.- Oct. at the rate of 120 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Sudex hay: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting.
Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 110 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac.
On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%.
Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon,
tanker or manure spreader. Maintain all waste handling equipment in accordance with
manufactures specifications. The system should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage
and proper system.
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
4

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal
discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste.
If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall
provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement' (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Plan. when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate. of
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where
runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to `Buffers" required by
DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian
Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided , the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]
5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATION
(Continued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no
more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filter Strips]
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(Continued)
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.
7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: rch a l al � iL
(Please print)
Signature: . 44% Dater /a .,Ob
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print)—::e
Affiliation:
vi5,Dp - i 3 2C5
Address (Agency): Z 7 Z� -C Q)Nr ro2.D,ZD
Signature:
roc Z& 9 6
8
te: I -Zq - 60

A
. ♦ . h
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I,
Waste Utilization System on
shown below.
, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his
acres if my land for the duration of time
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other
trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I
also understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial
fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Date:
Waste Producer:
Date:
Technical Representative:
Date:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Term of Agreement: , 19 to , 24
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
6

' EXHIBIT A-8
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crco yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditicns, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (Sea FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. 'lo ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied co saturated soils, dur-nc
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered w;th waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential fcr salt damaee from animal
waste should also be ccnsidered.
Pace: 8

4 EXHIBIT A 1.9.,•
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED_ SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a,high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and'a"suitable winter'cover•crop planted to
take up: -released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to, -planting of the crop or�forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after Cc, -ober 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 -.Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than '-00 feet tc
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
la. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other _cro_certy
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided.
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not he applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into: water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pine runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrus, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagcon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regular iv for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Pane:

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
EXHIBIT A-10
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills.. A regular maintenance checklist should '^e kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21.' Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) o
all waste treatment laccons. Pumping shall be-manaced to
maintain the -liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 clays of utilization and soil_
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and concer-levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when thes
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disn_osed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina requlations.
Page: 10

TABLE 1
PRODUCER NAME:
Gerald Foster
DATE:
1/19/00
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Realistic
PAN
Acres
Lbs. N
MONTH
Type
Yield
Utilized
Applied
362
1
HwB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac.
150
18.4
2,760
April - May
1
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac.
100
18.4
1,840
September -October
1
HwB2
Soybeans
25 T/Ac.
100
18.4
1,840
April -June
435
1
McB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac
150
12.8
1920
April - May
1
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
12.8
1536
September -October
1
McB2
Soybeans
15 T/Ac
100
12.8
1280
April -June
2
McB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac
150
3.8
570
April - May
2
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
3.8
456
September -October
2
McB2
Soybeans
25 T A/c
100
3.8
380
April -June
3
McB2
Corn Silage
15 T/Ac
150
23.1
3465
April - May
3
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
23.1
2772
September -October
3
McB2
Soybeans
25 T/Ac
100
23.1
2310
April -June
441
1
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
23.9
2,390
March -May / August -October
1
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc-
100
23.9
2,390
March -May / August -October
2
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
11.6
1,160
March -May / August -October
2
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
11.6
1,160
March -May / August -October
3
ZeB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs.
100
10.5
1050
March -May / August -October
3
ZeB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
10.5
1050
March -May / August -October
4
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
12
1200
March -May / August -October
4
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
12
1200
March -May / August -October
5
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
0.8
80
March -May/ August -October
5
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac,
100
0.8
80
March -May/ August -October
6
ZeC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
10
1000
March -May / August -October
6
ZeC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac-
100
10
1000
March -May / August -October
7
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
17.3
1,730
March -May / August -October
7
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac-
100
17.3
1,730
March -May / August -October

Tract Field Soil Crop Realistic PAN Acres Lbs. N MONTH
Type Yield Utilized Applied
454
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
15.4
1540
March -May 1 August -October
1
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
15.4
1540
March -May / August -October
2
PXC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
8.6
860
March -May / August -October
2
PXG
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
8.6
860
March -May 1 August -October
3
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
12.4
1240
March -May / August -October
3
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
12.4
1240
March -May 1 August -October
4
PXG
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
3
300
March -May / August -October
4
PXC
FescuelPasture
2T/Ac
100
3
300
March-May/August-October
5
PXC
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
6.6
660
March -May / August -October
5
PXC
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
6.6
660
March -May / August -October
6
McC2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
1
100
March -May / August -October
6
McC2
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
1
100
March -May / August -October
7
McC2
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
4.6
460
March -May / August -October
7
McC2
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
4.6
460
March -May I August -October
8
McB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
1.5
150
March -May 1 August -October
8
McB2
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
1.5
150
March -May / August -October
9
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3
300
March -May / August -October
9
McB2
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
3
300
March -May 1 August -October
10
McB2
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
9.2
920
March -May / August -October
10
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
9.2
920
March -May / August -October
455
1
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
i00
6
600
March -May I August -October
1
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
6
600
March -May I August -October
2
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
2
200
March -May / August -October
2
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
2
200
March -May 1 August -October
3
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3.7
370
March -May / August -October
3
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIAc
100
3.7
370
March -May / August -October
4
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3.4
340
March -May / August -October
4
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3.4
340
March -May / August -October
5
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
0.6
60
March -May / August -October
5
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
0.6
60
March -May/ August -October
456
1
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
6.6
660
March -May/ August -October
1
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
6.6
660
March -May 1 August -October
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
6.8
680
March -May 1 August -October
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
6.8
680
March -May / August -October
3
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
7.4
740
March -May I August -October
3
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
7.4
740
March -May / August -October

Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Realistic
PAN
Acres
Lbs. N
MONTH
Type
Yield
Utilized
Applied
467
—
---
--
---------
----------- —
1
HwB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac
350
17
2,550
April - May
1
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
17
2,040
September -October
1
HwB2
Soybeans
25 T/Ac
100
17
1,700
April -June
469
1
ZeB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac_
100
2.8
28G
March -May / August -October
1
ZeB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
2.8
280
March -May / Augusi-October
2
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
14.4
1,440
March -May / Augusi-October
2
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
14.4
1,440
March -May / Augusi-October
3
PXC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
1.2
120
March -May / August -October
3
PXC
Fescue/Pasture
2 TI Ac.
100
1.2
120
March -May / August -October
4
PXC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
4.1
410
March -May / August -October
4
PSCC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
4.1
410
March -May / Augusi-October
5
PXC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
0.8
80
March -May / August -October
5
PSCC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
.100
0.8
80
March -May / August -October
6
PSCC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
1.6
160
March -May / August -October
6
PXC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
1.6
160
March -May / August -October
7
PXC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
1.9
190
March -May / August -October
7
PXC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
1.9
190
March -May / August -October
481
1
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
9.6
960
March -May / August -October
1
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
9.6
960
March -May / August -October
2
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
1.2
120
March -May / August -October
2
HwI32
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
1.2
120
March -May / August -October
505
1
CeB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
8
800
March -May / August -October
1
CeB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
8
800
March -May / August -October
507
1
CeB2
Fescue(Pasture
2 T / Ac.
100
13.1
1,310
March -May / August -October
1
CeB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
13.1
1,310
March -May / August -October
2
McB2
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac,
150
30.1
4,515
April - May
2
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10T/Ac.
120
30.1
3,612
September -October
2
McB2
Soybeans
25 T/Ac.
100
30.1
3,010
April -June
3
McB2
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
4
600
April - May
3
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T / Ac.
120
4
480
September -October
3
McB2
Soybeans
25 T/Ac.
100
4
400
April -June
4
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
10.2
1,020
March -May / August -October

Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Realistic
PAN
Acres
Lbs. N
MONTH
Type
Yield
Utilized
Applied
1170
1
McB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac.
150
35.5
5,325
April - May
1
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
35.5
4,438
September -October
1
McB2
Soybeans
25 T/Ac.
100
35.5
3,550
April -June
2
HwB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac.
150
9.4
1,410
April - May
2
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
9.4
1,128
September -October
2
HwB2
Soybeans
25 T/Ac.
100
9.4
940
April -June
3
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
3
300
March -May / August -October
3
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
3
300
March -May / August -October
4
ChA
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
4.0
400
March -May / August -October
4
ChA
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
4.0
400
March -May / August -October
1171
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3.2
320
March -May / Augusi-October
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3.2
320
March -May / August -October
2
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
0.6
60
March -May / Augusi-October
2
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
0.6
60
March -May / August -October
3
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
6.1
610
March -May / Augusi-October
3
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
6.1
610
March -May / Augusi-October
1201
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
8.8
880
March -May / August -October
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
8.8
880
March -May / August -October
2
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3.8
380
March -May / August -October
2
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3.8
380
March -May / August -October
3
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
7.3
730
March -May / August -October
3
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
7.3
730
March -May / August -October
4
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs
100
4.2
420
March -May / August -October
4
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
4.2
420
March -May / August -October
5
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
7
700
March -May / August -October
5
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
7
700
March -May / August -October
6
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
6.8
680
March -May 1 August -October
6
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs
100
6.8
430
March -May / August -October
7
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
4.3
430
March -May / August -October
7
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
4.3
430
March -May / August -October
8
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
5
500
March -May / August -October
8
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
5
500
March -May / August -October

Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Realistic
PAN
Acres
Lbs. N
MONTH
Type
Yield
Utilized
Applied
1234
5
HwB2
Cam Silage
15 T/Ac
150
34.6
5190
April - May
5
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
34.6
4152
September -October
5
HwB2
Soybeans
25 T/Ac
100
34.6
3460
April -June
4754
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
8.3
830
March -May / August -October
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
8.3
830
March -May / August -October
2
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
11.5
1150
March -May / August -October
2
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
11.5
1150
March -May / August -October
3
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
2.3
230
March -May / August -October
3
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
2.3
230
March -May / August -October
19300
1
HwB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac
150
1-6
240
April - May
1
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
1.6
830
September -October
1
HwB2
Soybeans
25 T/Ac
100
1.6
160
April -June
2
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3
300
March -May / August -October
2
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3
300
March -May / August -October
3
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3.1
310
March -May / August -October
3
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3.1
310
March -May / August -October
4
HwB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac
150
3.4
510
April - May
4
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
3.4
408
September -October
4
HwB2
Soybeans
25 T/Ac
100
3.4
340
April -June
5
McB2
Cam Silage
15 T/Ac
150
13.7
2055
April - May
5
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
13.7
1644
September -October
5
McB2
Soybeans
25 T/Ac
100
13.7
1370
April -June
6
McB2
Com Silage.
15 T/Ac
150
11.5
1725
April - May
6
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
11.5
1380
September -October
6
McB2
Soybeans
25 T/Ac
100
11.5
1150
April -June

Gerald Foster
Tract
Field
Soil Crop Realistic
PAN
Acres
Lbs. N
Type Yield
Utilized
19525
1
McB2 Com Silage 15 T/Ac
150
10.2
1530
April - May
1
McB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac
120
10.2
1224
September -October
1
McB2 Soybeans 15 T/Ac
100
10.2
1020
April -June
19560
1
EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac
100
4.2
420
March -May 1 August -October
1
EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac
100
4.2
420
March -May / August -October
2
HwB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac
100
7.5
750
March -May 1 August -October
2
HwB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac
100
7.5
750
March -May / August -October
Total
706.4
153,795
2 year rotation
(from facility 80-43)
Number of Cows
500 X 76 lbs of N/cow amount of N produced tyr
383000
(from facility 80-25)
Number of Cows
200 X 76 lbs of N/c:ow amount of N produced tyr
15,200
Total N produced tyr from both facilities
53,200
Amount of Nitrogen produced in 2 years
106,400
Deficit of N
47,395

TABLE 1
PRODUCER NAME:
Gerald Foster
DATE:
1013100
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Realistic
PAN
Acres
Lbs. N
Type
Yield
Utilized
469
1
ZeB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
2.8
280
1
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
2.8
280
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1 Ac.
100
14.4
1,440
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TI Ac.
100
14.4
1,440
3
PxC
FescuelPasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
1.2
120
3
PxC
FescuelPasture
2 TI Ac.
100
1.2
120
4
PxC
FescuelPasture
2 TI Ac.
100
4.1
410
4
PxC
FescuelPasture
2 TI Ac.
100
4.1
410
5
PxC
Fescue/Pasture
2 TI Ac.
100
0.8
80
5
PxC
Fescue/Pasture
2 TI Ac.
100
0.8
80
6
PxC
FescuelPasture
2 TI Ac.
100
1.6
160
6
PxC
Fescue/Pasture
2 TI Ac.
100
1.6
160
7
PxC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
1.9
190
7
PxC
FescuelPasture
2 TI Ac.
100
1.9
190
505
1
CeB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/ Ac.
100
8
800
1
CeB2
FescuelPasture
2 TI Ac.
100
8
800
507
1
CeB2
FescuelPasture
2 T I Ac.
100
13.1
1,310
1
CeB2
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac.
100
13.1
1,310
2
McB2
Com Silage
15 TI Ac.
150
30.1
4,515
2
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T /Ac.
120
30.1
3,612
2
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bu_lac
100
30.1
3,010
3A
McB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac.
150
4
600
3A
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T I Ac.
120
4
480
3A
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bu.lac
100
4
400
3B
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
10.2
1,020
3B
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
10.2
1,020
1170
1
McB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac.
150
33
4,950
1
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
33
.4,438
1
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bu./ac
100
33
3,300
2
HwB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac.
150
7.4
1,110
2
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
7.4
888
--
2
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bu./ac
100
7.4
740
3
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
3
300
3
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc.
100
3
300
4
ChA
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc.
100
4.0
400
4
ChA
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc.
100
4.0
400

f 11
Gerald Foster
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Realistic
PAN
Acres
Lbs, N
Type
Yield
Utilized
481
1
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
9.6
960
1
Hw82
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs
100
9.6
960
2
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
1.2
120
2
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
1.2
120
362
1
HwB2
Corn Silage
15 T/Ac.
150
18.4
2,760
1
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac.
100
18.4
1,840
1
Hw82
Soybeans
43 Bu/ac
100
18.4
1,840
441
1
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
23.9
2,390
1
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
23.9
2,390
2
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc.
100
11.6
1,160
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac.
100
11.6
1,160
3
ZeB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs.
100
10.5
1050
3
ZeB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
10.5
1050
4
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac,
100
12
1200
4
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
12
1200
5
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
0.8
80
5
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
0.8
80
6
Zec
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
10
1000
6
ZeC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
10
1000
7
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs.
100
17.3
1,730
7
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc.
100
17.3
1.730
11

454
455
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs
100
15.4
9540
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
15.4
1540
2
PxC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
8.6
860
2
PxC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
8.6
860
3
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc
100
12.4
1240
3
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
12.4
1240
4
PxC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3
300
4
PxC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3
300
5
PxC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T1Ac
100
6.6
660
5
PxC
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
6.6
660
6
McC2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T1Ac
100
1
100
6
McC2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
1
100
7
McC2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs
100
4.6
460
7
McC2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
4.6
460
8
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc
100
1.5
150
8
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
1.5
150
9
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs
100
3
300
9
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc
100
3
300
10
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
9.2
920
10
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
9.2
920
1
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIAc
100
6
600
1
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIAc
100
6
600
2
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIAs
100
2
200
2
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T1Ac
100
2
200
3
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIAc
100
3.7
370
3
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIAc
100
3.7
370
4
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3.4
340
4
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIAs
100
3.4
340
5
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIAc
100
0.6
60
5
McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
0.6
60

456
1
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
6.6
660
1
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
6.6
660
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
6.8
680
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
6.8
680
3
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
7.4
740
3
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
7.4
740
467
1
HwB2
Com Silage
15 T1Ac
150
17
2,550
1
Hw62
Small Grain Silage
10 T1Ac
120
117
2,040
1
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bulac
100
17
1,700
1171
1
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
3.2
320
1
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
3.2
320
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
0.6
60
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
0.6
60
3
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
6.1
610
3
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
6.1
610
1201
1
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
8.8
880
1
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
8.8
880
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
3.8
380
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
3.8
380
3
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
7.3
730
3
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
7.3
730
4
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
4.2
420
4
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
4.2
420
5
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
7
700
5
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
7
700
6
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
6.8
680
6
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
6.8
430
7
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
4.3
430
7
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
4.3
430
8
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
5
500
8
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
5
500
4754
1
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
8.3
830
1
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
8.3
830
2
HwB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
11.5
1150
2
HwB2
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
11.5
1150
3
HwB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
2.3
230
3
HwB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
2.3
230

19300
1
HwB2
Com Silage
15 TIAc
150
1.6
240
1
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 TIAs
120
1.6
830
1
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bulac
100
1.6
160
2
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T1Ac
100
3
300
2
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs
100
3
300
3
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TlAc
100
3.1
310
3
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc
100
3.1
310
4
HwB2
Corn Silage
15 TlAc
150
3.4
510
4
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T1Ac
120
3.4
408
4
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bulac
100
3.4
340
5
McB2
Com Silage
15 T1Ac
150
13.7
2055
5
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 TIAc
120
13.7
1644
5
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bulac
100
13.7
1370
6
McB2
Com Silage
15 TIAc
150
11.5
1725
6
McB2
Shall Grain Silage
10 TIAc
120
11.5
1380
6
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bulac
100
11.5
1150
1234
5
HwB2
Corn Silage
15 TIAs
150
34.6
5190
5
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T1Ac
120
34.6
4152
5
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bulac
100
34.6
3460

Gerald Foster
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Realistic
PAN
Acres
Lbs. N
-__---_-----------•--------------
Type
Yield
Utilized
19525
1
------------
McB2
----------------------------------------
Corn Silage
15 TIAs
150
--------------------
10.2
1530
i
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
10.2
1224
1
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bulac
100
10.2
1020
19560
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
4.2
420
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TlAc
100
4.2
420
2
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 VAG
100
7.5
750
2
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
7.5
750
435
1
McB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac
150
12.8
1920
1
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
12.8
1536
1
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bulac
100
12.8
1280
2
McB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac
150
3.8
570
2
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
3.8
456
2
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bulac
100
3.8
380
3
McB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac
150
23.1
3465
3
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/Ac
120
23.1
2772
3
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bulac
100
23.1
2310
623
1
McB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac
150
2
300
1
McB2
Small Grain Silage
10 Tlac
120
2
240
1
McB2
Soybeans
35 bu/ac
100
2
200
2
HwB2
Corn Silage
15 T/Ac
150
3.6
540
2
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 Tlac
120
3.6
432
2
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bu/ac
100
3.6
360
3
Hw62
Corn Silage
15 T/Ac
150
60.6
9090
3
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T/ac
120
60.6
7272
3
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bulac
100
60.6
6060
Total
651.6
180,254 2 year rotation
Number of Cows
500 X 76 Ibs of N/cow amount of N produced lyr
38,000
Amount of Nitrogen produced in
2 years
76,000
Deficit of N
81,495

rq
�
V.

3113
A i E3
Vf`

3
sm
OFk
�V
0

�J
t_�Ilmmmw, m

m..
■M

ti .-,.{ ,� `� •.. i 'n ,� � Yi Nq i, �,
0 s', ��
a _ r FW r4•
• I ' ...b / r °,1{• �' - >RF � , r qG•r h;T"
i . T 9
a
"!4'''d�9o° �� � a 5' s�. �a iG �� far'" ��.r' A •�fi "
. � y
41,
.�, � ' ,; .T � �,��'•v p .._�'•�"��, f � o} G A ! (��, ate'' w . '- Y � . �;�" } r j•: . t� ^• a.. Qa'o
" 4 ,e.." ,d �.-fir d" �• � �'' 1n y� a ..r�
jit A i 1 R � �� t � [ d l£ w �S a d�S4�g •nR�� ! ,
' ^L.i, + ,;,•,r�";�` `F '. �" c � _ y �, k� 1' •�'.': J �:i+'t� �'!' �y°'71iY" : �a ci
�il�Y.`t, �� a - •.,- � O p � ° w 'L ice( G, m irk
.r. i�r1' 3�Q �s �Y 8c
71
u �' " i ��: � -� • � - ,; Y • wr �L fiyr �,4,�'' �ry •T. g , `iv �4 o r .� � � �
p v 'rl r - _ .- • n ' �. Ooo � - i v� N QQ � Q 0 rr 'R .�
p'.2. •` ; so - N ,y1��' Vii': W¢' 1 f y �n'� . �.
YX
'l i -.Q .-� +, � .t, �• di9 f.� `Q i, 6 .9 rI R.'°� .��t
`�•"pt1�y ,� � ` � r I ,s her{ i s � ./y, � �,�/� .- � AS, i ,
Irj '° '1 'i�^ � �J. 1 G '4 ..( p[if `,' G V�J •�. 1�S'•� � r
., L ' [ • S J ' _ art
kil
,Sw � ' ''lla a P.�f .�i�yy,. [yf f.4Q .i: L'- ♦ L i 11 {��
+ "1 F o � � ' • �� lit - • U ! ♦ � i '� d. .�� � . P � 0 '�
° ° v� D qtr ��y';� • I�• � aT r Q'- - ? . R -�l d . '�"y 4'+'�� - o
�V�M}17 Mt sae J'. f+tr Nu �.J' o h.. >•..At^1, et x`s" nT ..
"j� 1'fo 0R '�ir�•"N µ i�T " ... �. p Y'� m'1 �` ` !
�
erti dF `'a °• 1
vQ
��,,'°•a �jr'�°44° o�p+ G ,ab lis:'• � r 6� \�F, 8 ,i 6 •r" a °� , ' C . ? �
1�
is,16'� �' t�-° a °� ° p °�� •f } ;�F P xis k o _ L
�q ? n $ � � „$ � 1.;i: �p�Rr �j p ,�+ ,v •>'7 n �1 � ts. G: 1, r`�. _
a �` srl ,dr'.`r'"."�dc - - o& -¢;`o. c. a4 �. ' r V ,i ;k •r`; -" a s` +': o
3 { �� o'- �' . a o � �' 4 9 y� v.�� r.,° , � ,7L., .gyp (� •�v,_� * � .�A,p+,ar° � o � . ' rte- „iy.
�ti t. rn.N a � �Q�"ps i,Q'�:.. ,t.> -°.i' ai '"K�t�• �. *GX�.,¢ o Cf �j!` r -b �1�[$�6'9"r,� D�Y'O..,yy3'sua% ••qq����i '%o amu,:. �i
CP
Q P?f�yv 4.'tr0 o r uV '..�'`' ° - n V �� ��; „9,�f4y„a Q9oa' i16'Q SKy,.s • ` '�' .i-!�'
Cho
ea
�f� �
�+ � s „� a °"���� sLi o. �t y �• ° °�-+h-'�s� o � g F.'' �y" a� d 7 � �' "' � Ae
p
9 was .f+:n y, f•r [
. 1 }• �.
I�rs.y f q ��:a�Q.. b, ui•§'� p7ralJ O-y,w�W.'" s�.,
P
1"!% ri
!n R� '� ll i .r'a5• pJ 5 "��Q1'.'e""' 'AI,.i l� 'a -l> nr �� r �$ p r ,� a!%Y �Y• ' i o� `' 4g°. ¢ °. b
Y0. � o- P; � � � ` /� �` ° 'l.�x��� � ''p �-. ,6,. '.C• @cb � YPgyr
,—, _ _.� �- �% Y�, � p. ��d'� s:•�..,
o �' � n ° � � d :'r",� r , -, ! ! 1 a, tr �" y, 141-I �� � .fin °- .R�' •w o
,• A,r �� ��'. �) i� ,} � f. � e ,t v �o °' r, r�r y" � � j J ir: i , �� _
��§w � ' : � .a� a .o ��c � ,="Ir i' • •• u . to =� � l.�' y t � �-. � { ��a ..y .
'ar .� q�"r ' j4r �rrr ' r, G� : ,^'9J' -r �.M "s' "`�".a-�✓'-y �5`' 4f13 i a � + pp
°% 4�, is l r[. r # 1 s c � `
Y7 .may, , rrgel; . o ri tl!ly6 a t ' 0 '� l
\. ��`�tj'�r r �,£F! pd' 4•� �.ri.,� �Q ya � �,1/'�d. �^' o � ; `i � J,;p '�7. �:
Mi��'t7 ,'-'��k! , 0 .e x?��l�,�t • ,� p a 3�,.p, .i %S ;i' �� c�: o ..-' ii r } .� O�� • y
yi��y'.,� i ry _�!',,'q o �. ':;,��•-.' '' ,%''i` (`'+ .�+ ta'' arT"' ,d I`/ � '� _ _'ll ° iD � r]
a,4 ` ° ,s, °A° .�
t � yt .'� ate' �. 0°�6.� ■,/ � �°� � 4 � e � �'' � �.y,t t3 4 M�. � i�
' � �_'y'a7 /vy, !'� /j � ,�i't%'!ro a'Q' o �y. 41 �D • � pa c�b�
41f

j
Az
*KN

r T1 a 'T.t,
�o' o.P � .``u f ah'o.i'+ sem, a - ,, a •� It �r � aF: r l � � � d '� �P a. ,:°:
dfdo
d: ° t :'�.2c.�y 4 ,�J ,�rt a„�� 1 r;.: µ .�•� F d�' . pa e � ,y 4.dpD �.y,� p •A. .
to � � �Q. � �..5 � m ° ?'i f„ ° '}:4 ., { i , X yQo.. 9 _`�:Zs ,° A •q�
r O -° d 0`J�S. �• 1f r 'dP, a :� v 4� 1 ;41Y ! �i`j: - ,
cdpl
Ali
fq
All
elk 20
wit
SQ
''R�1..X ,j� �s Y +ts�n �. ..a7 0 ,� ' S_•�r. � Sjr !r'sr' '+I�i ,. � h � 1 q '^^'3 ,:
•.� !'� '�S t�Ls+..�Y` „'. F"'' ��i". �S'. ''Y a71► °°^^�G��w`` .�Ws'( a 'k p� _ n'�" n . ,sp � a D '� ��
-
ey`�i t` ` U `a` . 1 C O, o J a0 !es. •S� . j r 7 •r9}
1.
,X• .� 0�� � o� o ° o °p °° �4. �� �• �-7i:� r}� ;11i/+�'iy,kl J ,
:'1"X'1ti;r:� coo T
`'Mb°� �' 'Dp _o ���° '\ wY r
° o :a °oCAP,
,:1 ' =`r a .p_d'3�7 Ou° � q iq•�' oS � �J"�p"tOL�� f 'r �" },��I °
eti y a A �'' � Q�O Q�� --QID. ° O W CC.JI , �. dam' ,,A R:�,�• 1' `' (� ” {i.
° p,, Q ad
•," 0 4p .�''� ti)� ou�pb .aO° oDd
��,� � ° ��, 9� ao.•.` �., Q o
p 4s4A Or
o n�'y Qp o °Q r �, of �.i•
AN
lb I
'
NU
/' .f�i! � S';. ?�•Ati, � ;� © . o i .sf � - �3� ' a C`� � R ti J �:�Q: �' •f• .a•'� ,Q `b.
Asa
t��,
�L'•R � as �i .� e �1 xT °� �" Ru �' � , ��

fyx�.' 1�'� � 44 �r' � d� ti"'3�'v • �j� y xa a•��+�i_"�� `�7p y ..�w�� 4 ;��� .�
'#.t �7�� t R� ° � r'k, a.° J + • f rtP't'r w- y�s�o-�d � v '�-y ,� a tyB{N:. a"a°�y .
7 if'�`�ta d' �i i'„'i ,� _ 'k.:• _ _ +'�� �� a �.,.' t'. F7'p° +7F-ir.��,r+ri
t � ,
uj o �'w J��✓ 4
1w
i Oa G PP h 4'{a,p rF _.N r•. . _ ,G'r,S J{j., 1r17 `. "AIPA a,
i�•� 7�.r n.nr tt� AF �' N •-4i''`, c,:� 1
ig
.a
�� �� o '�S+ _ �� � �, ,ap ��'�iK�'yt ",�` '.a „ ��� �bio- '�- j, • � a: ,P.y��" � -1 �°..tea,
T% C
�Lr�
`�'
••�+iP�.rp��.�r
°o °����a�' 8,°,,,,,=�,,gg`�j�D_���� '�°off :� ti� �� qr � � r9°���'� '+ ° ' it��d a �3•° off'`, �� ° ?' �� �' � - of �., 0: :9,..
+�
i
° -y..7.ry. Q^--+ K, 4`�Fa ..i +�,! ;� �P+,-.. 7r„ t a:n °�° t�.rb " •,� ..'I ` Ate,_
4r a � `o.�! m, r it r wv � - "'''4�y °a y k., � �, .,9 'd „' yip c p - 3 � � r r� {•� `+� h . r. Lr err.
Pt Tiv "�'��� i� -� ��i� QY d A ��J]{�a''OLl�, (r�o_ ; l} ti+ 'F,�-., �'fl �•R_
o"Y- a p q,. c+. cv, r-tW t • �. '.Pr r '.
s 5° i f�, � ` T,f y o. c ����{I•P��di. u r °e
�`af,,
4i7 f D -ss' "flgr '! 6' is - fT _ €r} ° O °... ,., ' O e=`'SCy•�S^ � p 4+i -tiPy .14
�C,�i-. "_i� , +v-• ° a J � .=i o .i�+. �_ i 'J �r IV .� _• 't �° +" '�Y.+y� ° ,
�"AD A:';4r ii tf��j t.• = .rA •s'.O. .,f f x,.w ca• _ i. ,Q.
i +ri_ . y '� ' a a ° .r�,rA f r.- i J' O F .s+' � T!�•i �:Y __ .i, ; �.. o °i� ��r , q• v .. '.. .
„' j � 7 p - r rho � �� �1`,�f t � r� { •- "�Eo ✓ % o rf - r '
'� Y,z� -, .•,.r�." 5 • o s � r+ � �'!J � .,_ ?r 1 yy � w ' {� pA� n i o .i �j•
0 ` ` ' 7 y r� no 4 ��� vA' � � .1r+ � •� - e "•r' ,y '� .a � t ;- '� �i� �l � � `N� h ty n,d : i o ,
'�8 ���:=�3��g� � �•�,."�.-',555 , �`' " � �� , � �� � � �° :�
�b a sA � = � Q ,� d 4! .�p.ls1 �, a p•' .o d
�I �t°�l•y y. _x+` ; __r; yFj 7
- x�. +'�•`�'. i Tr R �Py r. � :i.;{t o ':i
if
!:�o a�Y„ �•',' B° �;'-��(!'c a ,�,_ _.�, ;,0 C�.0`�,,. qo qtr° P .p6o. /�
Qo
'WAD
n q
�fi . �� '� c��,`y , KI(�`n r,•'.f }'. �' j A 11; „•�`!,k' +� '��/ x NO w ,r c o':
ew
IL
t
}� '_ ,�Q. •. to � . 'p` j M 9
nii I �, �1 ,o p _ 'qfi.. �0C, aya ii77
MAWTl �F ii`T
' fAlt' ff3ai
c ° � n _ �O ��y, I Ryku3r. �{4-'ri-\� � � y���_. }1•, - yt"' la .^+
J , �' �3� . Q'� �h `';.li . A� ' 14F- !� e`� �', _ ,,�, : . ° '"R .�';r • 4 �`4 4^ � �° J�`r max' � .����'{i't'
�-.�� 'i f t, t �r;wili'tflr..'{ , •' 0
C %4v
vv
4346
°y ti�..1 �;
rr�_ ,. 8.
M

W. 91,:
p•',. � �� is r Y - 7 }� � �, �' .
Li. 'L� �, y_�`' ;.. - h;• •,� ..7. r I f .. 1 V 1 �-i' h � "tier
Fit � i 2 � ,ya,• `ti•h�.. n� '✓.. a _- � .i�, `.�-Y...,,; �...•. .; y J_i'
F. s ���5 •:;r ..._. ., • + .I''-:•' ]1. e _ ._+;:. '� y���r71: ': �f': n^`~ �.Y,•.,J '�r' ir,
�� � {'•.+.:., n1. a'•.•+.�� t �;•'.w} . r t•: i� l� ^--.` �r:. y'��,,�i-f •`fes f, r��,� , � ��.y .:' � i'�s �l�
fr,. .r•i^, rf.'Ir[rr re �i �l �Y;tiy �,'�, 1 ,+�J'-,.�1; `-� � ,,�?t1�., i� J.r rr A• -'.!t. r.^v
TK P'ir�ytt• ` •t.i 1� 4r �.,�, _ e4t I V i .i.;' ••�, •fir i
1 �`ri ! � `q y r � Y �'� .. 'r •.t "�a t1 .,:.'-• �', !s - �J J v. r tJ. � .x �., j. '.�:f } _ri
`r^4'GY}i'1 �Y��7� -'lf �Nl tr �a '�.' a44 s,� = _•.'i . +�.•: �7�%J� r• _ �r.f��'yYy J..1--: n�.iyx.'. a/}'Y�„ i..�, �•�;4=�,. ti
r},�4'�a ,'��5r'!� it��� � .-a r �'�:•i� Jri: y',t.... `; �� . ;.i V : ii'i s +J• irrt_..,r� f` v •r".;`j
.s {.t f ; x i •,/ t7F. '✓ +, '` ..,_i. ��,•: y a->„ t're[ r e1r�_ f• i�• y �•• �.yir-•.ry r ''•:j k ti�Y--
.`.�� tf •`�•\ ~ 1 aL� .,.' s..? ^ �t -:::•/ :� ""r ♦..rS r� � : +'�`�
}x rY' R ^' '' nFr�4J ��,•y:,•. 'i �:: :'_ Y ti' �., rr � � %' t i �r 'i. iti y � fr ,cJ �.
.:y �, rY�-} k"•i 7�•fr�.: . aif't:`'i'�. xr,y, v. .• a!N v -y f).� •.. �'Y :'r • ��� : �jf'"r�".-. i"� � ••.J •J { !.� ' {
'_ + � rst ' '4� ,'Y"•.'� ',{.t ��' v r ,r .'4rf..�'.' ...�- r,"�. 1' .'! ar t ,';_ ',�
.K• � _i _ z• ,r `.• S,s �. .� -y, ••.�,"�`��-,l.v si"G� 1 r^. 1 '" �•�..L. ,, ,: -"�. '"r 'Ce aJ �+�.r
� r 1 - . Vii." ti A '� r .. ♦ i -i •1 'e . Y ':
,r at ;, 4J_y• ..r I- r+ :� Re, '�l T.-.
r' ° r,.� r f"• ;.,st r t ,'
♦ P •: •+ ' "''„ j f' �'� � jr{L.r: �: �1r.� �• �{rr � �. � ` - - } - ,..; C.r �r Tra�^ • L � :.
$. i• ,. + � N�+ �"•iirr `••. '' �4�,,v 1 x a ; r � tia Zt'X �., r Z 1 J✓'J-.
Y r •, .. ^a. -.rl,� rF. rr�j` '1�i: Jy! , •; y�. T. �} •` _ i3 - i rr .d� aQ1
�+.,!t-. r}S - .•;�' •. y la'i .��rt'`v,y. �1 3. d _. J!''ia +. y +y � 'T 1•� j
'�Y�� tar lJ '�ri 11�", �� ��{,,;"�:+��"l1 w., 5 .�•S. ti ,'t, a•' �•r5`�`.r •+!• S,�alr awtia f
-• „Y} [` ��� •...' 'IL-�)),','r,�:r.,�. '�t,�{.•:y�-.�'tY�rj {i, �` y i;_ iY ,�••'r'�:-�i75i :• "� f.. tr1..�1•.� t u � l
•i *•'•, "Y v �1.i r y'•`""'`T. +� 7� A +' _ :�'• .+•rr ! ry rlr �' `
y: ' u . a L. `✓ i • y /6 r es rt' •'L+..� r',•fC4 #tib' w � -
• ii V-rr,f -, t . i�'' 'ef '- , �Y r lY F'.a• S [ Ir _ . 14 �Y�. yi 7 r, '� l lrw'Y
• ` •�, .'�,; •I { 4 , rJ , �•n � fir, lik
.I �51]' ' •rh -�;t` �tjr^' rix:'-. •'��._ .i'r e�,•..r •+�; "' - h: *,w
). 4 .- * �•yr =:1.tA`t, �l�{� 4 � , .r nom+. -.,� - ,rY ..
%�', 1.� � d!-1�Ytf/ �� • r. �. �. f _r•i •:., r•a4;� v . y�� r �
+ `tea •'` : ,� %�' ' • :..�,.L f ,
a '
r
r'. � � �'-�>•r.�' ^' � std, � r,' ' N� °r� r:ti . . n��,
.. } ,tip ',�• � „k_,,, ,�"„
H
lum
�:urtY.
ri ii a s l • r ` { •• �
i+ �, i Of xi.
t
W. 91,:
p•',. � �� is r Y - 7 }� � �, �' .
Li. 'L� �, y_�`' ;.. - h;• •,� ..7. r I f .. 1 V 1 �-i' h � "tier
Fit � i 2 � ,ya,• `ti•h�.. n� '✓.. a _- � .i�, `.�-Y...,,; �...•. .; y J_i'
F. s ���5 •:;r ..._. ., • + .I''-:•' ]1. e _ ._+;:. '� y���r71: ': �f': n^`~ �.Y,•.,J '�r' ir,
�� � {'•.+.:., n1. a'•.•+.�� t �;•'.w} . r t•: i� l� ^--.` �r:. y'��,,�i-f •`fes f, r��,� , � ��.y .:' � i'�s �l�
fr,. .r•i^, rf.'Ir[rr re �i �l �Y;tiy �,'�, 1 ,+�J'-,.�1; `-� � ,,�?t1�., i� J.r rr A• -'.!t. r.^v
TK P'ir�ytt• ` •t.i 1� 4r �.,�, _ e4t I V i .i.;' ••�, •fir i
1 �`ri ! � `q y r � Y �'� .. 'r •.t "�a t1 .,:.'-• �', !s - �J J v. r tJ. � .x �., j. '.�:f } _ri
`r^4'GY}i'1 �Y��7� -'lf �Nl tr �a '�.' a44 s,� = _•.'i . +�.•: �7�%J� r• _ �r.f��'yYy J..1--: n�.iyx.'. a/}'Y�„ i..�, �•�;4=�,. ti
r},�4'�a ,'��5r'!� it��� � .-a r �'�:•i� Jri: y',t.... `; �� . ;.i V : ii'i s +J• irrt_..,r� f` v •r".;`j
.s {.t f ; x i •,/ t7F. '✓ +, '` ..,_i. ��,•: y a->„ t're[ r e1r�_ f• i�• y �•• �.yir-•.ry r ''•:j k ti�Y--
.`.�� tf •`�•\ ~ 1 aL� .,.' s..? ^ �t -:::•/ :� ""r ♦..rS r� � : +'�`�
}x rY' R ^' '' nFr�4J ��,•y:,•. 'i �:: :'_ Y ti' �., rr � � %' t i �r 'i. iti y � fr ,cJ �.
.:y �, rY�-} k"•i 7�•fr�.: . aif't:`'i'�. xr,y, v. .• a!N v -y f).� •.. �'Y :'r • ��� : �jf'"r�".-. i"� � ••.J •J { !.� ' {
'_ + � rst ' '4� ,'Y"•.'� ',{.t ��' v r ,r .'4rf..�'.' ...�- r,"�. 1' .'! ar t ,';_ ',�
.K• � _i _ z• ,r `.• S,s �. .� -y, ••.�,"�`��-,l.v si"G� 1 r^. 1 '" �•�..L. ,, ,: -"�. '"r 'Ce aJ �+�.r
� r 1 - . Vii." ti A '� r .. ♦ i -i •1 'e . Y ':
,r at ;, 4J_y• ..r I- r+ :� Re, '�l T.-.
r' ° r,.� r f"• ;.,st r t ,'
♦ P •: •+ ' "''„ j f' �'� � jr{L.r: �: �1r.� �• �{rr � �. � ` - - } - ,..; C.r �r Tra�^ • L � :.
$. i• ,. + � N�+ �"•iirr `••. '' �4�,,v 1 x a ; r � tia Zt'X �., r Z 1 J✓'J-.
Y r •, .. ^a. -.rl,� rF. rr�j` '1�i: Jy! , •; y�. T. �} •` _ i3 - i rr .d� aQ1
�+.,!t-. r}S - .•;�' •. y la'i .��rt'`v,y. �1 3. d _. J!''ia +. y +y � 'T 1•� j
'�Y�� tar lJ '�ri 11�", �� ��{,,;"�:+��"l1 w., 5 .�•S. ti ,'t, a•' �•r5`�`.r •+!• S,�alr awtia f
-• „Y} [` ��� •...' 'IL-�)),','r,�:r.,�. '�t,�{.•:y�-.�'tY�rj {i, �` y i;_ iY ,�••'r'�:-�i75i :• "� f.. tr1..�1•.� t u � l
•i *•'•, "Y v �1.i r y'•`""'`T. +� 7� A +' _ :�'• .+•rr ! ry rlr �' `
y: ' u . a L. `✓ i • y /6 r es rt' •'L+..� r',•fC4 #tib' w � -
• ii V-rr,f -, t . i�'' 'ef '- , �Y r lY F'.a• S [ Ir _ . 14 �Y�. yi 7 r, '� l lrw'Y
• ` •�, .'�,; •I { 4 , rJ , �•n � fir, lik
.I �51]' ' •rh -�;t` �tjr^' rix:'-. •'��._ .i'r e�,•..r •+�; "' - h: *,w
). 4 .- * �•yr =:1.tA`t, �l�{� 4 � , .r nom+. -.,� - ,rY ..
%�', 1.� � d!-1�Ytf/ �� • r. �. �. f _r•i •:., r•a4;� v . y�� r �
+ `tea •'` : ,� %�' ' • :..�,.L f ,
a '
r
r'. � � �'-�>•r.�' ^' � std, � r,' ' N� °r� r:ti . . n��,
.. } ,tip ',�• � „k_,,, ,�"„
H
lum

�+ ^�`� r• i••� c•k •�} h�h r -, r '�� � c Y OEa a�r 8 ° e,�Vv a
bo
6,4
,,,�,�„u-;,
t '" t Y�9�� '�' •'" �`hlatLl ;Kt� ' �i; ` 3•i. gyp ° °tV, e
"" „y�Ai',a j�! crf _ •� s l a R� y ° ��{. ,q°
no .A
�, 1 ti y�* !:ir + � `-Sr" y f � J • 7j �� � i ��:. •�i � d ,� 4 �, p .a � 4� 6�-" o a '0` V < < fl i
9m 40, ° o°jP
e , � '}'Gra 8 .. . • .f ^ " a } • h. �
0 Q � •"'�f , e r "a :(�' •!� ,' + � ;;f,�� v; _l ,�^r + -0 ��1'Ai ' - �r � -1' °'! {�l�
el Q N f°' ` �i d i sa
��� �.�SiQ °_ . � � r � off- �`.� '� oa u• o` ^� r , fir.
w a � O,Q� 0; .. �, j. y r• ,{' * �i r •�,•�.R• ' y�, • vQ "y .•-L�.O�°- •G' {► , rE r
a 7 0.
n ,� _ ° �.� A� ,� 1 ': } r �S,y -3 ,n • rxt _. -¢ 'Q�siS 0 S � mkT`.'o y .("��Z r� _. rr,
P.
cp
cl,
h � (F � � •v L3 ��� � +C � ''t • ; � '�•�t '�r`,7 h� r � • r � c(; -.i4 � j _rc ` �%: Y .
4i O d° `, o p ri y Q �,J w���•�+. A- 'y �`�1r
'3D�� ae�� R'`. o' ' fitly' : a t ,E
io4_}' a J., + ,�.. _ ,�' °� •c ,
N r ,
aci U �d . ° r q `� v'' o}) �y �'• "tg'
nFd f �8ja
04
bp
y VO��pooa�.=t*e
ca
VW
Do
�,i t p °' i f. fC�,# 1�� r. �; Lar•
`
y 5.55'
PC
r i;r• \ ,�., p 7F1�5�,1�"h� .i r.1,+ .� -�.:;�-. .' .a y '4
�� �tci.r�'MR: � �` r+�.� � D:o��'f}� ��. sl ��,,c.yY• ��•!� •'��' cC. ' �. �4�r.�r�i
���� � "+.14•r A c e" �o f /' � r. >• c ;y� � '.� , � w�rj � p.v n. ;'
O.
�""•w� Ccs •. �t� ._ k r+ �.�. � _ � c,s r V� ap•, fl r� ',l 'fl
le
Affill,
1 J ,po., C.•

e Y Y lv, � x.321: r. .-74� Ae'
T
�y .e '� k�
v F1 Q
i �'il X. � t tq e��+�1� �� w•h�`" �'�',e J.f n4 D rt•. .f
ig C`� 't aiF i F�1� • 1S ,i ce a k S •
S � � c. q o �'�"4•+� � f4 „`/, t 1: ` � 1 'S,,r,.`v� I f � QJ'8�10 � p 4
p ��� � � O t a1 IJV, ,• '4 `� � 4i � ,`' �j' o
v���y 0 ° v } ', Rte•' 2w 1 § 1 F � ) �y � . .0 * •� c ��„ °�
� O Wr6:41'Y a .. p •° '� � .O N w � y,y y p
I- �• R. ° � Y,v�vpY. 0 7 J( [ y p^'S_-Ij y ��'�s ,1140 r".
o or u o
RY •�
��� O9 C �rR.,' �Qi. e��'J•17 9y y,M `°'} � � ,' I ���
y� a- 0 9.-- � } ;gip at o .,,0 r y r a �bO� �• '+'J)u � � � i �S
° i ° •p 0� �v�v. -`moi p 9:. � + opQ ,aQ! a'� G� t Re
U
app ) tS'm G �-nn o ,D ., b p• .•
qDa, Pgz
,ti��a '.-0 v O f
43'
_ On. Q°
°o r
to
.ra`
Ki .. o,i �� •i ter: o O °. � �Y ':
�8
8 'b
Be
tbo�,
v0s o'V'
�� �s � ° Y o O 'ti o tl � i€i P ° V> _ a Q•�wo 0 p o � "
A d a% --
41Q
%9-1
� --: p _ R °' .��� ., A ,a � �' neo ° °2 � `f •� i.S+. y '�� j} � "�"� r
U
e
�� ,f `�', w �wh_ ST} rii��"!�i' i il••//fir•

'�•"� � k Z� � .,.•5 .s�,'y..iyv� - � .a .t l� a • t � 1F" • • �7�.-.. �: .;,her lry 1 � ��� •,� fd' r n !: ,,R.L � '����'j 1y
'� `4 .` •., ���y! ., r;y�p�. �•1i'�'� ,�+ ��,•�.���,�-05' �`�'•3 ♦AaM ��'J�' ��f�A7 lC +^'7 •�J'•;' �1= `,.>71���y
1, f � + J•��}b'`+k ''4�"! �.k - �'� �a'$� 1.�. -Y n "n;, �� � y , ,, r7 Y l� ,'±Lvi}` ti� {� 1\'i 't�
• s .�'kx� ." •�4X � �� ~' � � �„�lr'1 l• � ,•'�J r4 ,7I�: ' i / �L•• � � �'4.^p��
>.: - ' ��'i rc � � '•�'E�:�� `$":'� 1'r-7';`�rr ;�Cr �'��< . �Lr = ru;, ' • '�'!, , � .'' r�%1
• av � ' �l;,. •Y+6w s1.� � ,�•,.r _ w.�' i Lf�'^L:a �' psi/h •' �.�
. f i ,ii ::3i; ^ � +. , �rtu`< .'%, 3 y,�iiM� ',r � a,� Y3: •r-;1�i,w a
Z' b�' �S��io, (,h. �a! ' �Y•-'.n�sr�;Y{vS. t��• } r;�
t� A?��la � 'T %I�'£ ,I ''�'':''�J'�' , t�++rn$%l7$.ta�r 2-�';r` � • r� 1 f�;L� }}�L' • ;y „�;"� �� , �' c.�
,' per. Jil '^�• �Cy 7� ,t�yhiv'�}lfj� � 1%y �• �{ •Y �. .l
- `7�%d"�`jt�y ' �: 1. ��' � � 'LR ,r • Y�%; ?b. � _ J�i �nk��KT�j� 3 I � .i'.
��. .['� ^n, �� rr .ate 1�v` i�.`� �-r.x.7� •t w, :
ria �!,.�,t �•t!•..-..�'� �� 7�
• .1 c
� 1. ��' • �♦ ,+ ,��. T ��� iF^...� - � zE. � • '�•!'moi
./'� r,:'{' .Z?�¢,'•a, 1 ��'"aL'�R� Sk^ u. L� rhe f � ' �►�•' ,�?,�
:fir., !� 1. !tJ � ;ti;ii����• %�• :�� ^t �A � j.� Z jjpk
f L y.,. •f � 1j: w. 1
A _'Sf'�”' 'Iy' , Aii �.l�e��; f%� • ��}�''7��. r{j�-fjl` nl�� r, �} •'��� r� ('a••'ri �'' ��--
I � 1' .� . � r. i5! � •r 'yrea."�y L'v-rte.-w�
,(.y , '�f F• c ,t.�']�1L Y� r� 1 y `i� 7 Y 7'y',4
f' inti' •1'S �L, �'L-�c LA...Ck{t.`•':�# �s!'�k
•1„�7;.,i yn��"�']4 f ;� � tfii.•I 7�7. .',.,•� •Y �`'}� Z,� �j�}.y,., �.
r Y�Ylii'`t '+ I.g � 4-. '�S^•1� 91• •4+�' � 4���.
}l'y.' ,t .��� j t' h � +it_•M \ i,+i,}'ifj• hh t '� , � r"r^'
8S ,$''.Y�t `t^:�':t{'�T��.. '�, rr.� i � • 1�� ' � 5�+�.� j �� �`�� 3rtx,'Z
�* � i � tiff; r ' S.. v ,� .'h -. ��, • ' C. w.'�yr� �'Y �• L/ � { t�
i, ' .3". " ` .,7 1 'C�',y���-1 .F�r.., ugh, �c. °'Y��, j O•r �,
Zh
f e3ti"lu..Y• •s!' k :a i� , ~a 2Castl+' �;.

E

- r � � .i4� t ck + r, r'r,'!"lr':,;,rA.'+�bt+. J e �,! : ^�w' lY Y..'�!t:°��,..: . ' ,�•a". 'd' - r ' �..
�.��•• _s - � , � � +,v'+` ,! t r� y� :/x GS ., . r7 Vr" L r? � r J�: .w ✓i. .1 s•. r � "�"r
elf i("�i �4ti Vit' � � � 1 5 � � �l '� . �t K .,� t�llj .yC�J 'W+' �'.'' e.� "� •v �:3�7"7S"J'
!. Y .�' _ �e r y.,a +' ilY''',.�,[[[���+�aarn�,! ,r y.r ` � t� � � •.r rA-•�.+ .{ i "C'•vi. ••f j �, �,.
_ li J. *�` �y��{,; '+� ,,:.«.�' �'�a�'Y k ;If��i��- Y `ir I�r'fJ F.J i- ."jj' f :"•ter" �ri.. 131f� 'rf,S��:
s I� J,d_ i �- 'r" '-f ��`.'.E'v � "3 .:= ��"`t ."a�'�s'rft'.;� ;} t1 i tir ate. 1•• ,,y4.,�
+ � � ? t� d Jt 1 �'i, { It y r�•}, � .,'� , - ( {;.�., �,; ' •::%. '`Y+.; 4r,:-f, ' � r `.��
+ �... 'yr 1 r5 irry :�. v-1• "r '1 •:Y r •�
',t�Y 1 y�' a 1lr � r It t�G >� �i yl2�)S � ,r_ f t �) :,4; 'Y 5'y't ry -� <::• I ary"ir
t4�` Pd i- :M .'n fi � •+' ° i����L� i� � r f^ t�1;1� , t �E'.,?;la ';� �,J•. •?� is .�Y 'j+� A
t, 1 }R,y. m 'G •¢•.. 2 ri a I.r�: t .f w\ fi F• a •-•cr�r +! a ✓.
�•x�Se� 'i �.'' � �ri r�J' 1 • •! .. °^ 'lkt'Q'!1•� - � `'1 yt y : -[y� t.�=
Yr s. � L r r )'i- +.�� Y� r{ 1/�)rL',y,•,,_ =�i;,v �,��I�r I �1y� '�1 (!•r ,I,'2:,. _ �, s � �,�
� �.. Tri , •.s )r t ''.,,rrgf� ,N) r r IV•i rr .t ;z, ,.
.,,? �' t J' . •�:� �� '-" ..1.. •1 v ra 't. it:� �t�..•.,/-~Jk y}I, �' ,` � ✓� � � ht. c.:
i _ r �+s� �_i �,.r',w�}Q rt�n�M1i, e r , ;1, C'`{•• s. + N�
.ts` rj� i� Y ��rL y7 � rip i v>., ti' • r� Vry' � J•:r F�y��J ell
�•ti
'' ti- •..• ��i rt'�(--•�✓ �-[t Y , I ,a' ♦y+i�,•e��f% f ••_rf� y �'' •tri', ..
w _ +I K-+fr.r• !{• -•!.' •^• T •v'S lii; f.i�^t' .r '}`•� 7cr.r�'a � :Y. ra rl't!%�/ ��: ���' jJ. i':�� �� ':
`Llw;
ti � r.. �( �, .,,;, ,.rf• t+ rte}
�'
1 t - . :5�,'% ti 1• .1y.i =:fir
t r••'7 "�,_ —-�,..,�—_ if. :"" yr r :r lia �vy S ti ,y.,..
�r- •r .,:�t� ''J :: ,, _y ,.,,r:,k�jr,,r•. ti( i.�Li'Sit•1 tw 1r
�t: �..`,� � Y }'{^ru, ..'h: a � +. 4'�. '•✓:' at+ •,r)�r f r :7 :} p S}.y�• T .
f - � '�'•` t tr i' •—`.its' ;' f ,t. -i4 x�rM
•�' J � ^! . _ _J� r•: F :r.• � .', •fir ',. •. �.7..
• -r l` r�Ir .. _r � n t,. �V''u'y �'_ :y' , , 4` l i•t' i:.'r`�Y�
_�V e . � r ij!'}� �.:�ll7i-�,f ! �rYw- • • I�;jx Jt. �� �•Y,• �) ,'•� �� i � F - �, F
' •YitJ�'�'.^"h�y`1-f�� a,1Cltd4•��,�,{,. ,� �yy.•.••i,M+ ..�,�-.. +�• > ryr G.. � ��
-. �' J •1� r _r4: '; f':1?-�+1' i�pp'FL•� pry r ��. �,,. w,^-°e r' + ,'k
K:q
�� rtiU , Y �• d C 1 •':ff I Y it , M1 = '-� `� . � • -:t,
+' J t��� � 1� �E_ _ •r .:,t � fi CF:�f � �11; • s ?..•:. •'+.•,t. d�.�
_ '' . .'Y' Sr� • .• - � j ' 1 } i ! �+. w.,l .'`�"' y r _ _4 {'�cr
�t r � j� .a. '1.. 1 r� • � �• +.
•`�.:1 �I� e: ►�"C,-`��1l�,yA• �� r1• ;�i .t. j{; '+fl;' ti.• e�� �r _a... «�•i':a�
,rr� 2 d''t:3� :.'•y1?`1Yy` ;.R'Y= 1 l ra�,K 'l:i � r .� _{ �' 4 , � J,t'�•�- ,s � _ t 3�:
.•~'4-.�`�,:7 �',—Il.l't�,ii �3.,�.•y,j �1 � , T_. -.� �,•r� � 5- rr - 4. �.
r' a't ,Vh r 4R � ! V;�' yJ�'i 1 }� ••'r it_, � y:1 < may: � :.. ,r Y S„S.•
.V� c�� ��'r1. _� ri��° �� t ��di'�, �� "l 1,:.►'�{j. y � ` i .T .. -•` `'. !' a. +�j. ti. • .;.,"'. ti.•.• • ,f* a•
'�'( e ir'iri�� i'x j(f��' ti' i-!�' 9 � .1�•",t '1" t � i•l.S,}�,,�(j, r;�•�'_1 r � .••��y�+•� \i
ra;Yy�/j4
i is „ �t*,,,1�,: ':/.,' S I i•T 'li�,Y,J 1��i ;Oy, {.` (�! Yiir r� �f, il� 1: _r ,•�' ..1r'�:tF.Y•J..
./r ��,f .,�► i1FT�'r Y% r �, 'i `t f�i •�' JZt 1-w.�-.[I f '�'�`"�.i �.i4 ;t.r,r-..v .. t
� Y f ; �`� r5 r /G► crtt ,�.y'��+ `�r • <' .., • ,r �' `'tet, ''�
/ 4•'1" •�a,Y,ll +t t. " j' 1 ,j' yt rJ. �:-• a i, i�.�y
1j�t-vv JT{,jll,T.F�iYiY 7j _� -o
IL tr.—
r�,» �t�•:t - i� « +i' t!lf l ; yt ����♦ ,_� s y+w. . ,r' r � � � „�.l' � cr� ,
_ {•, f�,•1 4.'. s.., • Yr 'xl�,.{,'rArl r 'v'w"• ,. _ .1+ fo r 1 1,<pvJ .':�1
y,. _ r r ^t iT _', :F4'',� 1 l ' R �;• ► a, _
x '• E • / 1 } t 1 s �• ey �• � r � •, t
r.l` .':"1� +,'- •�' t Tr �j'`i' yY iit � •V a,?: .+.• � I. 7' ,' � • y = h ' '� -. • r •~'�� : f� � ''aid. `.
r, r�v'j• •'• �' l i F y ,,... .6..r:r r'��,j .M ti, r :.�. � fir. r� �f •• :J't- x.r*.k
l; �1 Vic.: ' ,- ! . t.J.ry-r✓J' a"t- V• t� V{� y'( 17, �.)-�'- _ ,I -�•ti 'J'.... S.r r»a'F- .`i ,';.. ;.'' _ �'p•'4Fa'` �. `-"•1 - f .Y(v.�'
rrN
!+ 'r "}'.• :\ t ' r e. �Jr ,'J• { 1 r
•�u� 'Mr, : •I r. rR �r1rS45,,;5; It.li,� Jr y y +`d,1e �F.1 _ •' L •� � - •+- +F .r;';. J%. /'f �� t� 1 ��.. p„
+ r r t � A �� 4G ���4 :{�� J I{r• � .r•' .' .- 1 , ``�-; '+ - S',.7Jt'r1 i. � , * ``
r •. a �• 1 f ,.•�� � Yah 1t TJ > 7`•{'y�' � y � 7 :; r 1'y. �' . i7, ,._. J {tr`� : iy;�' r ' :.�-••r •� r:-��.
F .1:{{ •3r•'r' �iw` sM/i�lld1 �': +t11--,, "Ji"
` J , .-: •r r';'r' v_'R:'- :: '+ 'C -7i �,5•-.;.,wy
;�nr-,•J i .r L:Ze >.; f,fs r '� 4. 1�, V.t �1a s(}L�,1.%', _.+ '—'tiV.G' ., _�..t .. -'a• �1 !t -i � ir.
y' 1S�'J T� 4 :ri 1tl�'4'stlfh+41 `FO�• vy r 1 r i �•'. r 9,' ,; r�:3.
�?L ;• f ,- 4� - + ' J 1 f Y'•'�.'�r`,.�ljtl;r r a. •i'ir IS'l }I� r i); 1 ; i f^ .i'L r •-.•�. ti � i J• Ji .2 .' ;�t :• '� r,
y , 't• Y� ! •. � '-.i k'CC�. �1��-�,+.•�s�,.,,�wf it f• t, i•�.i �i. { r i e, .• - t ��;.•. •� •f'`',:\
n �J.y ; y� NY t'!.'tigYi. iJ•. ��i'•a i' t'h'y 1 �.�t,if`i. i •'rF e+,, �w ' '`y
Y w - f + 4 1, !f" 1f , ,1•,`ti.. �'. `�.} �' a . .I I • ,., ,,., �,t.'� ra '1 i)r
yf�kJs
�'-1`y• � *�`r `r. f rr i :tf 4 I. �.�t+�,t.. � ,�}1' 'C .�..,,
��; 1 t�. r` t? ,;• y'. ,ri} v' • �•- ,},-�•• ;3.�, y'�� ?�]4 �•;i:i� Jr- t'.,r..,i'.f• •i+'S•
v•.r' 4i )� r s kl ryr�7ltif � � J y r r J� •r rtt 1, j ,1 � ,,,�� t -,� y4�.f � � L, h •_•,,t.l r, _ Mfr,.'• - 4 J {, rr , ;+,, "s •� '4 �
J �'fi�yr t.J 5,3 '?�� � � �Y,F, ' r V�y < pM�rq+q,,..}�'t+�:.1.�,-�j.r • • ✓ lirA ycr • f • :+�i'.%' .�

rii �i r� ` h.�` 1ale�:r� -r wiv i "r(C/ r➢�f.] '14y •r '7 1 f ■ -i •, • � w•'�sl� �•.
ft '` '++t .'n� + `•t^y Y'=•i•`'.i � r � x'v � !fl 'y Mme.- 11�'r;tvt,`�, L'S, • � " +l r.
. _•v+ -f } ± -sE r �s.t �. p�}C,,..tY t�. 1.•iL �'r.
.tr t
� Y '4z• i..f;� Va C" ���i. -�',+ _ �k�A.�(' �y. 1��}t.iti�, > 0,$`.` !. .y,... `• +aj."1, - t-
ot9+ rki iy_
^J r .fir ,=L 1 � n a•M 1[�'v .' i \ 4 � n 1 1 S 5z •R
k Ell
't � + .-� +.. .y 1 0 �1k4�� f'44L .*�a r y 1'� � s� ✓ f.
+ .s -'�� � 'i9-� +rE-.�r'e,ay��igt r�C,� 1- �' l � ♦ }' .
-�• f t rift �� •� r• � � 7� r,.Pr�in�+E 1... +}
!•�i �k i • i's+�[ � kt �P'w��`#�t�e+3.�� i ,�%�;�t
,\r y��Lr �-+�' e 4 �� • Tri' :H,i;. ;r Y..
a� rI
112
}„ z +'•k ,aF ``'•F r iy-Jit'�e r, +.,y� JTM�.� r r FY �?l'• �t
'.k1'l+..k♦ .�,s�k'y n ,lS - h r'441,r� i',�y tr,x', i '*St+t'�rl,��_ f 1 f•• -
-'` `�, ' 3 ''•'a [j . t, 1 : y >, t :. h. i t r ,a > Ti 4, , ^s �Ey� r,� �•[Y' �� �p �f. .t
•+ ��n :r + � ti..' w M • � ' „+r� �'. t• f�.y J �� r r� + �: ''���i�} Yfk�i'fr;�,.ryy,L r
y4`'�*ytsVO)/�
1'( �• > • y • , L� 1 � • r,� J 'rti k.a.L L�+4' ' tr � ',;•fit :�;� � �•.. +.. �.r�,�� � ri Arg ���i'➢�^~ ��i 1'►
,�� . s�4 r r` � 1 � y., t � r Pt-r�+5wi� ' ` f ��r t ♦ � `1, - �y+ � /''�� li ��7••,'.
*� i`- !+„ice 41e ?* '.T ` r�;t� � f.a.zkfJ �G 1\i. , � St.+.����r .iS C •�.F� .tip•++C��f r���,p�+�'
. 1 F� A '`{•�•ti . .. ` »rtT v 'i � , -.F ', .7` ...+ ii, r+. 1���' T�•�� P��+`i"r•FS ti.,,4 +' .t d `r r � �. 44 i�d��-i+ r
,'; �+ •' •6• . ) fG' p�t•. r ) Jr� �f}.w •�'.i.t ="tier., '..a �'f, .men fib.
1 M 'Jr i •� Fp�� �`• ,r� y�k'ti1�� � � r r� ,• t L � �;,� C z'r � �1-~ a�
* `::A�,ct•!„- � aY;� �i t ly � n�t.�r'r't' " ) �� �.� t ' »� �,' � R.. 'e•' .' 1
+SYS s 3 ' %1 a 4�r I
�, ' �.. � +yr t�t� y�a"� 7✓ +d S v t a �rJ - �L �`•..
\.,��.' Z ? y,'�::'1 y'a' `'l ! ;+� {r ➢,I.w ,1j�i r��,'-r`;4r+ �Yt,`� F`.+� r'1 - 'r r'L :-` aw
iir -uJ S.p �a r..2 i,iw Ep k1: r4.i r� .'S ` )/ •,{r r f"r"'1" / �b:r�'+"r f'y
14
IA'
ti. t'
i
♦ r'. ! r`'l' ';r t' i. +' i"r Wt,�{ t'1' �.-iP,�o- jy!'4i r- �„�n•�>,•
t:; '• _ ��v%.;•r,t�tr'r*. t+ c�.,K i��4'K•�,r !-,}(� .E � ��`�-t .. r�i.t,�+.ft. Si":,+7? •�`�3
�rr �l+ij faty l��', y�, •�7='4 Lsa L3' j;�� ��, n�; ,FYj.,� s� f _? �.r.v;+f{,�iy. �l'• ,'t + - y+ ,iJ4'F.•K.+_y +C syn ^' 4•+ .
r?�+. )�
y"�•�r - • t ray , st"i#•�3"��y `�,' ��}'ri•' r!'�'f!�1�a•. �!1` J rLY�'�'S,r'�rl.y� � '- •� �)•r .'fir' s t�• \ "� K: -.k.. .�~`:
k +' � ti � y rr 1 1 � in. r -j r r'+' - ti \ 1♦ ',!`• ` > > r r� � , k �;•:
+f! iL
Y "a t - - a; �,F 1 f, ,{� .. {k '��y.�h7�� Y ♦ L� 'Z - C •',
Zr'. r t :, sl t'` , • r„ T- -
g�i '� triY ^'•,' ar •r }• �! `rd;�.. # � �7';," 6♦!s`,�sST� �� t v t ` j r�l� Sl- r.1 .y a: i '1:k� 4�l° w' [ t x L e i \ 1. + a
rx.l � ti fro �' ��. w r h � �, �1 � � � :� rP.'�,Q„ \- y •.' 1,}.'• } w a y� � ''+, � F,4 r k r � ����'
),#�: 1. 5r. t J ry �' +,," •; 'Y'r -.+ i15tC, �*a i s tii �Y•y � ti �_r .+. � }
f l ^t • � ir+; `'' � .� :si4f- : rt' �' ' f i J��yir,,.%'”` r•'�.; Y'tiJ � . i- :+ h`.. , i- •}+. � , -.. ` { >rt tiY •r , , `• •l. : e �'.� .
a � ♦ s^�rti w Y `1 ,s a'.t .�n .R - �+1f i+Ovf•�r''4 .S.°•' •M ►'y'ti..�� � rS ,� .4. � t �` - s�.�-S _•
! ►Rah ,1{.�.. t �.• C' - r+Ti'h't r, v • �•t. �"_ q 3� � 'i
.-q`t# r ' '"t '�' �''x .' $' '�,Y • 4 ,,�r _ � ti- `li'bt 4 ti`,r �x•'` s ♦ '' _� � . .f R
r�t r :tea t +`r,yi _ •k ?=' � � ., ry,p +� x.r r• i` ♦ r w J++Cn,
a f i, rS P..,, �� 'S;r•�'.F�" a r • j� \ j ,. � 1 � tY F,A�•ki1 t .y;,�.'-C�,.?ai'r �' C� y �' k• " r�}rrr �y
1! �,� �' r� 4 * , S 4•i+ .aF f r1 ' '+. Y -frf. + "r. 4 J'✓ 1� ..n y � r �i 1 t� ���
+f t }y r ? F � Y /- .r t - r 1 'L �• 4 WK �.a^•tt "Y
r 1 tt�� i ♦ r L 4 Y•� 11•, ff.... Jr ti„3.:•,..� s+�r'..,.,` � � r . L:.{�.... • .+t f
.,,, } r ::+'� Fr w s ti.Y+LN:.w ■ ��i0.�''S � 2 es•r v , , - ..�3Y• ` -+i• �,
�S 1•r\ . � 1 Jt ff�'�•i. r^�}"i> F:"\r.�`I��, r l _• � '�` � ,. Ci r•�?••;.t+ t ffil-V
"vt4A"=.` k= r• Jj
A;`.ti ' +._ �. �.•� +r., r. i • a.�}!7 � a \ L }• M1}: � - t 3 n.a: -„ - y, .
J . �r Wit'' ,+�r,•�� f i �_�� i .� �•�.rt. * t�.� n r 1.�. �°[=�! : �.�=-:•.-^. f � jam=-{ ���, •—" .
�;. .+T r�'L'f - �r � 1''� �. 1 . � / rf rM ��.•^�. n r. � ` A� iy ��tC � i� ''�� f r, ..
•.1\
A• {•'' f .r-yS ` r _ „ 'JFr r.r}-1'�:r,��,r•
a'Wz i � t "t Y.� i . r a � , �' �y - r = �Y ,C, ��t nri� � l i it� 'F'1 yf moi• ,, ,i ,c
�,tr-,,•l1� t�SgS • �• 1' '' t..+ ; 1$•3 i;•'S�i 7]t if'`1:7"G'^�.�y � r!:
7ir�a'114�f*'lJT��w}er'r)'
pff� r �. Q+[ �t I, + �{'r }1 L' r r L•y ` � iy �. f � 4 L •'.
`►s-.L6� i ;i7�Lx �j t7 '�i � '�' r a•' .� r.v _ .t.l(� �'J,y'•���.-�;.�C �Sl}. { ; +a!t, z
' [♦, iy Y+'' . ctfj.!,C y,i•Sf 1y r{I r _ r vt:r':_7 yc� �� . ., _�', u `v.:.�. }n dlm lr. f ' v�jiy
r
i•�'1 ti'1 t t 4th- ,rl^r I�`p� - �ri'"•S• I .
'rC TM.r ^+ v's'r4''! rt' `�� �r� .�/�ir,SF�.:4�r .. ter. h�\1 i r,' «�JJ-f• i��y .:G . .C. a1 4k.'�. - 'Cy' �J'
*v {S+'x" �_ •,L" )t. i * . r,tcr•,�'7'Jt'ri L_ t'' r �A��J a ' ,...fat y
w;. t. n+rM jti♦ k .r: �r 4p _ t-r!�rr
i:�''"" r+ , •y r • ! J ^ � ' � a?C =q ii t f ' r�r� ti.`: r C U t• : �s��. +f e'i I y r �' "'` v t �- r, V 1 ti� �1 4,YGsr r� I
w v / r `[; ', �1~" •�15 -.�r.v tS� t � 5; 1..'a k�+y v, rr >e r c - X14 4-y,,
1 v •r. •,.
to +'1S�'14`I r vet• �'•',-!+wL�� 4 - til'y- til�,.ty r.y% 7.�"s>;r5+

DATE: 1113/00 -
Gerald Foster .
Dairy Waste Storage Structure
Rowan, NC
Design Criteria:
200 Dairy cows at 1,400 lbs. each = 280,000 lbs. live weight
90 days storage
5 gal./day/cow of waste water
17,991 sq. ft. of non -pond Drainage Area
Waste from Freestall area and access alleys will be scraped and stored
in the waste storage pond, as well as tate runoff from
approximately 17,991 Sq. ft of the barns and loafing lot.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Storage Volume Required
A. Manure Storage
200 cows X 14.6 gal./day/cow X 90 days
7.48 gals.lcu.ft.
B. Waste Water from Milk Bam
200 cows X 5 gal./day/cow X
7.48 gals./cu.ft.
C. Normal Runoff from Open Areas for 90 days
Drainage Areas 17,991 Sq. FL
1 day CN 98130 day CN 92
Monthly
Months Precip. (P) (inches)
January 3.72
February 3.78
March 4.61
12.11
9.46 runoff inches X
90 days
Monthly
Evap. (E)
1.1
1.83
2.92
17,991 sq. ft.
12 inches 1 ft.
D. Waste Feed and Bedding
10 cu. ft. ! day X 90 days= 900 cu. ft.
TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED 62,249 cu. ft.
35,134 cu. ft.
12,032 cu. ft.
P -E
2.62
1.95
1.69
6.26
14,183 cu. ft.
Runoff (inches)
2.85
2.9
3.71
9.46

- Add to liquid Volume -
11. Normal (P) Precipitation less (E) evaporation on Structures for 120 days
December - March
Ili. 25 yr. storm on Open Area of 17,991 sq. ft.
CN = 95 for open areas
With 25 yr. 1 day strom of 6.0 inches, runoff = 5.41 inches
17,991 sq. ft. X 5.41 inches runoff
12 inches
8,111 cu.ft.
15,470 sq. ft. surface area of storage pond
IV. 25 yr. storm on Pond Surface
25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 inches
V. Emergency Spillway
25 yr. i day storm = 6.0 inches
Peak discharge = 3.2 ds.
Use ESW with 12 ft. bottom width,
3 to 1 side slopes, 0.2 ft. stage
VI. Freeboard
VII. Total Depth of Pond 8 feet of storage
83,087 designed amount
70,360 amount needed
12,727 amount surplus
6.26 inches =
0.2 ft.
1.0 ft.
10.75 ft.

UNITED SPATES DEPARTMENT OI" AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROJEC-17FARM: Gerald Foster Dairy
DAVE: I i 13'00
• A 4" X 4" treated post. painted white ora 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
sliall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation 96.5 At 110 time should the
effluetlt level rise above the maximum liquid level, which is 2.5 feet level below
the settled top ofdam.
• A visual itlspection of the waste stora�te pond will be performed at least twice a .,ear.
The Inspector should check the condition of the dam and the emergency spillway,
The inspector will need to look for si+gels of slope failure and seepav_e on the back-
slope
ackslope and at the toe of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to
check for si4ums of damage due to vartllint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.) burrows.:1
yisttal inspection should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the
structure is not experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Anv problems found should he
brouF-1ltt to the attention Of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
• The waste storaue pond will need to be nloWed twice a year. All eroded areas shall be
repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground cover shall be
reseeded to provide a vegetatiyc coyer sufficietlt restrain erosion. 'file dam and all
constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 300 pounds of' 10-10-1 O per
acre or its equivalent.
• `-laintain all waste handling equipment—pumping. loading, hauling, spreading), etc.--
tn accordance with the mallLIfacttire rs specifications.
• All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization
plan. The waste storage pond will be emptied at the end of each design storage period
1 90 days or 3 months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the
effluent.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: Gerald Foster la Foster Farm
DATE: 1/13/2000
• Contact the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources - Division of Nater Qualitv - Winston-Salem Regional Office at (910)
771-4600 if the problem occurs Monday through Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm.
If the problem occurs outside of those hours contact the State of' North Carolina
Department of Crime Control and Public Safety - Division of' Emergence
iN-IanaL,ement - Raleigh at 1-800-662-79-56 or [phone]. Provide the following-
information:
FACILITY NANTE: la Foster Farm
LOCATION: Cleveland. North Carolina
REGISTRATION/PERMIT 9 80-25
If there is ifan4uer to human lice, downstream residences, roads. etc. call 911 ofthe
Rowan v County Sheriffs Department at 70.1-636-1011
• Begin lowering the liquid level in the pond byapplying waste water to nearbv
irrigation fields if possible.
Contact a contractor to begin repair of the problem to minimize off-site damage ( list
the names and nilone numbers of three below').
NANIE
1'1-I0NE NUN•IBER
1 L.P. BarIzer
633-9693
Larry Powell
278-0527
3 Kennv Williams
636-0686
• Contact the
Rowan
Soil and Water Conservation District at 637-0783
• Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage pond . If this
specialist is no longer working or is not ,mailable. contact another technical specialist
1V110 ila5 UCS1I11 JWJJIVV'al �iMAI Jb U1G PUL;,1 LII" 114C1.
NANIE I PHONE NUMBER
R. Bruce Rider I 704-637-0783

EMERGENCY ACTION PLA -N)
PHONE `UMBERS
DWQ 704-663-1 6gg
E%LERGE`CY -N-IANAGcv[E.'NT SY'S TEN[ 704-638_Q9l1 _ .
SWCD 704-637=078'1
MRCS 7174-637,-] 6n4 _
T iLs plan wiil,be implemented in the event that wastes from your ore.—:tion r..•e lezlins,
oVe:t7owinz. or rennins off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface watees cr
leave your proce:ty to consider that you have a problem. You should mate every effort to
ensure that this does not happe:r. This pian should be posted in an accessible locncion fer
all emolovet:s at the fac;Hcv. The foliowina are some ac;lon items vou s`ould tate.
Stop the-e!ea.sd of Decendimz on the situation. this ma,; cr r,a: ;;ct be
ossibl--. Sueses:ed responses to some possible probl-ms are lis;ed be!cw.
A. Las_on overfiov.-possible solutions are:
a. .-add soil ;o ..-;n to increcse e'.e,faticn of d=;.
b. ?,amp wastes to fields at = nccec:acle rate.
c. Stop all tiows :o the lascon imm. :otc!y.
d. Call a pumping contactor. tor.
e. vlake sure no surface water is entering lascon.
B: Runoff from waste application field-acticns include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Cre--te a temoorary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate "Vaste+to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reasons) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for me fields where runoffeccur-ea.
C: Leakage from the waste pities and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop rec:c!r ourno.
b. Stop irisation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate fur;•r.er dischars_.
d. Repair all '.eaks prior io restarring pumps.
D: Le2k,:Ce fror', .iu'sh s'r•szLms. hour,-_. sciid include:
a. Stop rl—cyc:-- pump.
J. 5icp IC%`1".. ! pur c,
'7E 0 rail 'I
c'.ys In tl.-..(,L!<,!� •s,e �. c. _cl�a �z_ ra.o,,.

e.. Repair all leaks prior to restarting* pumps.
E: Leak -ace from bwZ or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is as :L
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dia a small sumo or ditch away from the embankment to c_tch all :ecaaee.
put in a submersible pump. and pump back- to lagoon.
b. It holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and fiil
holes and compact with a clay t}'pe soil.
c. Have a-protessional evaluate the condition of the side wails and laugh
bottom as soon as possible.
?. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
o. Approximately how much was released and for what duraticn'
c. Anv damage noted, such as employee injure, rish kills. or prcpe:,v cam-
---d. Did the spill leave the prope.ty?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Cowd a future z2 enc cause the spill to .each su:.ace
4 are potable vvatc %vc!ls in dander (either cn or or or c +e
h. Holy much reac;.ed surface waters.
Contac: art:roariat: ac_ncies.
a. Dunng normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Wait. Quaiit.:1
regional offtc_: Phone: [phone]Jter hours, emergency number: 9: 19-1 Z�
Your phone call shlould include: your name. facility, te!ephcre numt-,:. the detail's
of the incident from item ? above, the exacc location ct Mc faciii.^/, the !ccaticn cr
direction of move- nenc of the sail!. weather and wind conditions. The core::ive
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of tl".e situation.
b. 1f spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone nurnbe, 638-0911
c. Instruct ENIS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 633:0$76:11 SWCD office phone number 6 37-078 3
and local vRCS office for advice-Aechnical assistance phone number - 637-1604
If none of the above .vorks call 91 1 or the Si,e iffs Department azd explain Your
problem to therm and ask that cc son to contact the proper aGenc:es for you.
S: Contact the ccncrar:or of our chieice to begin repair of problem to minimise ctf rite
damage.
a. Contmctors name: SEE LTST
a. Ccni: -::ors Adrre:s:
c. Contras:ors Phcr.e:
_:_..'.tet.

6: Contact the technicsl specialist who certified the lagoon ( RCS. Cons:ltin��
Engineer. e:c.)
a. Name: R. Bruce Rider
b. Phone: ' 704-637-1604
1: Implement procedures as advised by D`%"Q and tecinnical ass:�;znc! aeeac:es to
rectify the damage. repair the system. and reassess the waste mzna2ement pian to
keep problems with release of wastes from happeain? again.

i
-CONTRACTORS
L.P. Barger, Jr.
1075 Goodnight Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
633-9693
Jim L. Bost
Grading & Contractor
Rockwell, NC
• 279-5548
Culp Bros. Construction, Inc.
3300 Bethlehem Church Rd.
Gold Hill, NC 28071
279-4020
T.H..Davis & Company
7585 Sherills Ford Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
638-0923
Dave's Grading & Haulding
2675 Providence Church Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
Freedman Grading
845 Majolica Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
636-3984
June Goodman & Sons
620 Gold Hill Drive
Salisbury, NC 28146
633-4802
W.A. Kepley
1601 Lincolnton Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28144
637-6137
Con. Co. Inc.
K.R. Miller, Inc.
314 Harris Granite Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28146
633-5386
Ken Kluttz Grading
5145 Mt. Hope Church Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28146
279-2702
Myers Septic Tank Company
Briggs Road
Salisbury, NC 28144
633-3962
Larry Powell, Backhoe Service
Water and Sewer Line Const.
475 Morning Glory Lane
Cleveland, NC 27013
[phone] - 278-4726
COUNTY --- ROWAN
James K. Shulenberger
516 North Main Street
Salisnury, NC 28144
637-9623
Walter Grading
1514 Center Church Rd.
Lexington, NC 27292
[phone]
Wilson Construction Co.,inc
2830 West Innes Street
Salisbury, NC 28144
637-9222
Keith Yount Construction Co.
7880 Sherills Ford Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
278-4502
Hammill Construction Co.
5051 St. Stephens Church Rd.
Gold Hill, NC 28071
279-5309
Marvin Church Grading
459 Fairmount Road
Statesville, NC 28625
[phone]

E -
Daily Farm Waste Management Odor Contra! Checklist
Source
-------------------- --- -- -
Cause
--
- - - - — - -- - — - --- - -
:11+11 lu nr11111lize Udul- Sile Spec C Practices
Fal Iosicad
_
• Daily IIIUtilluicill
n
Vegclativc or wooded bullets.
surrace
Mixin %vllilc filling; ;
❑
Recommended hest Illanagement Ill aclices
%plc.1der otlllcls
• Agilation when enlplying;
D
Good jutli;urcllt and common sense
Paved lits or b;tlll alley
0 Wei Inalllll'C-Comed sill I;IeCS
❑
Sclapc or Ilush daily
stn bice.
0 Volalilt: gas enlissiolls while
n
Ihomolc drying; with Ilruper vcllliiatit,n
51tt11)• ill"Stlltit�'C oil held
dlylng
fl
Itutdine checks and maintenance nn walcicls,
Scllhnu baslll 51111:ICCs
g:1111:11 IIIIc1Uf ial decoillIlosilJUl1
❑
hyth.-mis, pipcs, muck lanky
Eledded;tleas
0 Ulinc
Flush kinks
-1 ',Uiiiulu thying %vith plugger vcotilation -----
❑
• I'mlial nliclobial decomposition
Replace %vct ur nlanure-covered bedding
hiamne dry slacks
0 Pallial Inicrubial decomposition
Cl
hovide liquid dlainag e ror Stoles maoitrc
SIolage 1.1ok or basin
• Pallial miclubial dcenlllptlsiliull
n
11411111111 or nlitl-icvcl loading -
surrace
Mixin %vllilc filling; ;
Cl
Tank cuvcls
%plc.1der otlllcls
• Agilation when enlplying;
D
Bmin sill race mats or solids;
❑
millimin lot Itmorrand Iitluid atitlilimis
Ullcomcd nl:nrllle,
0 Volalilt: gas enlissiolls while
El
Agitate only pl lnr IU malnlre temoval
51tt11)• ill"Stlltit�'C oil held
dlylng
I7
huvcn biological additives or Uxidallls
Scllhnu baslll 51111:ICCs
g:1111:11 IIIIc1Uf ial decoillIlosilJUl1
❑
I,Ilglllli;ElalllagC IlUtll 5ClliCd solids ----
litlniti while tanks arc filling
Outside draill cullcclinn • Agilalion durillg waslcwalcr
or junclion bUXCS cuuveyallce
AfAQC - November 11, 1996, Page I
0 Emend fill lilies to (tear bollon1 or (anks %villi
anti-silllwll vcnls
❑ Box covers
Mixing. while filling
Cl
Remove solids regulal ly
• Agitation when emptying
l mime, slurry or sludge
• Agitation when spreading
O
Soil injection orslurrylsludges
%plc.1der otlllcls
o Votalile gas emissions
❑
Wash:csidunt manure from spreader allcr use
O
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Ullcomcd nl:nrllle,
0 Volalilt: gas enlissiolls while
❑
Soil injection orslullylsludges
51tt11)• ill"Stlltit�'C oil held
dlylng
(p"I'Sull Illcor'potalloll within 'is Ills
sol ghees
GI- Sprcad in thin uuirorin layers for rapid drying
O
Proven biological additives or oxitl;oils
Flush kinks
• Ag ilallon (if iecycled lagoon
❑
Flush lank covets, —
litlniti while tanks arc filling
Outside draill cullcclinn • Agilalion durillg waslcwalcr
or junclion bUXCS cuuveyallce
AfAQC - November 11, 1996, Page I
0 Emend fill lilies to (tear bollon1 or (anks %villi
anti-silllwll vcnls
❑ Box covers

-404f 4A -O
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
- " - Stillcr -- - — C:ntsc - - - - 11511's to [:otilrol Iliscrls -- — - Site Specific I'i acliccs
Liquid Syslcros
1'111511 GinlCiS Accumidation of solids f_7 Flush sysicni Is designed and ollclalcd
snfficicully to icnlove accumulated solids fionr
gullets as dcsigticd.
C1 RCIIIUvc blislging 01'.1CCLIi11111310 SuhdS al
alisch;u ge
Logouus anal fits CIlI51ClI Solids 17 Maintain lagoons, Belding basins and pits lvhcic - _W
pcsl bieedilic is appaicill to mir►intize (lie
ciusling of solids to a depll► of nu moic Ilu►n G -
8 inches over mute Id►an 30^/0 of sot face.
IlXCCSSIvC Vcbclalive
Giu%vll►
Feeder s
Decd Sluiage
• Decaying; vcl;cl;Iliuu ❑ Maintain vcgclalive conllol along banks of
lagoons and other impoundments to ptcvcnl
accumulaliun of dccayint,; vegetative matter
along %valet's edge un impunndmew's perin►cler.
• Fued Spillage
WC
• ACCuill►llatiosis of ICCd ICSidLICS C1
AN, lovetnber 11, 1996, fare I
f
Dry Syslcns
Design, operate and mainlain Cced sysicins (c.g.,
hunkcts and Uuughs) to miniinize the
accunullatiun of decaying w;lstage.
Clean lip spillage on a Iowine ba.Sis (C.b'., 7 - 10
►lay itilctvaf riming Sim mitt; I5-30 day inictval
during whiter).
Reduce noistme aMIJIMI;llioli withilt incl
aiulrud immediate pedinetc r of feed storage
meas by insuring diainage away frorii site
and/ur piuviding adctlnate conlainuent (c.r.,
covered bin for bielvcl's grain and similar high
muislnic gtailt ptoduc(s).
Inspect for and icmovc or break up accumulated
solids Ili filler strips around feed stunge as
uecdcd.

-Mortality Management 1•iethods
(check which methodi s) are being implemented)
R
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within ?-1 hours after
_ knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv tlowinz
stream or public body of water.
tfd Renderine at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
J Complete incineration
J In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
zi :env method which in the professional opinion of the State Ve erinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the St,ae Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 13. 19016

D G TABLE 1
PRODUCER NAME: GeraldFoster
i
DATE: 12/13100
Tract Field Soil Crop Realistic PAN Acres Lbs. N
Type Yield Utilized
469 1 ZeB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac. 100 2.8 280
1 ZeB FescuelPasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 2.8 280
2 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 14.4 1,440
2 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 14.4 1,440
3 PxC FescuelPasture 2 TI Ac. 100 1.2 120
3 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 1.2 120
4 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 4.1 410
4 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 4.1 410
5 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 0.8 80
5 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 0.8 80
6 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 1.6 1610
6 PxC FescuelPasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 1.6 160
7 PxC FescuelPasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 1.9 190
7 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 1.9 190
505 .1 CeB2 FescuelPasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 8 800
1 CeB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 8 800
507 1 CeB2 FescuelPasture 2 T 1 Ac. 100 13.1 1,310
1 CeB2 FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac, 100 13.1 1,310
2 McB2 Corn Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 30.1 4,515
2 McB2 Small Grain Silage 8 T /Ac. 96 30.1 2,890
2 McB2 Soybeans 35 Bu./ac 100 30.1 3,010
3A McB2 Com Silage 15 T/ Ac. 150 4 600
3A McB2 Small Grain Silage 8 T /Ac. 96 4 384
3A McB2 Soybeans 35 Bu./ac 100 4 400
3B EnB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac. 100 10.2 1,020
3B EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T1Ac, 100. 10.2 1,020
1170 1 McB2 Com Silage 15 T/Ac. 150 33 4,950
1 McB2 Small Grain Silage 8 T/Ac 96 33 4,438
1 McB2 Soybeans 35 Bu./ac 100 33 3,300
2 HwB2 Corn Silage 15 T/Ac. 150 7.4 1,110
2 HwB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 7.4 888
2 HwB2 Soybeans 43 Bu./ac 100 7.4 740
3 HwB2 FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac. 100 3 300
3 HwB2 FescuelPasture 2 TIAc. 100 3 300
4 ChA FescuelPasture 2 TIAc. 100 4.0 400
4 ChA FescuelPasture 2 TIAc. 100 4.0 400

Gerald Foster
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Realistic
PAN
Acres
Lbs. N
Type
Yield
Utilized
481
1
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc
100
9.6
960
i
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc
100
9.6
960
2
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs
100
1.2
120
2
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc
100
1.2
120
362
1
HwB2
Com Silage
15 TIAs,
150
18.4
2,760
1
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 TIAc.
100
18.4
1,840
1
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bu/ac
100
18.4
1,840
441
1
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc.
100
23.9
2,390
1
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc.
100
23.9
2,390
2
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs.
100
11.6
1,160
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc.
100
11.6
1,160
3
ZeB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc.
100
10.5
1050
3
ZeB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs.
100
10.5
1050
4
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc.
100
12
1200
4
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc.
100
12
1200
5
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc.
100
0.8
80
5
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T/Ac.
100
0.8
80
6
ZeC
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs,
100
10
1000
6
ZeC
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc.
100
10
1000
7
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc.
100
17.3
1,730
7
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc.
100
17.3
1,730
v

454
455
1 EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
15.4
1540
1 EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T1Ac
100
15.4
1540
2 PxC
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
8.6
860
2 PxC
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
8.6
860
3 McB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
12.4
1240
3 Me B2
FescuelPasture
2 TIM
100
12.4
1240
4 PxC
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
3
300
4 PxC
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
3
300
5 PxC
FescuelPasture
2 TIM
100
6.6
660
5 PxC
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
6.6
660
6 McC2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
1
100
6 McC2
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
1
100
7 McC2
FescuelPasture
2 TIM
100
4.6
460
7 McC2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
4.6
460
8 McB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
1.5
150
8 McB2
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
1.5
150
9 McB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIM
100
3
300
9 McB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIM
100
3
300
10 McB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIM
100
9.2
920
10 McB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
9.2
920
1 McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIAs
100
6
600
1 McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
6
600
2 McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIM
100
2
200
2 McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIM
100
2
200
3 McB2
Fescuel Pasture
2 TIM
100
3.7
370
3 McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
3.7
370
4 McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIAs
100
3.4
340
4 McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIAc
100
3.4
340
5 McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 T/Ac
100
0.6
60
5 McB2
Fescue/ Pasture
2 TIAs
100
0.6
60
.. 4

456
1
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
6.6
660
1
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
6.6
660
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
6.8
680
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
6.8
680
3
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
7.4
740
3
ZeB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
7.4
740
467
1
HwB2
Com Silage
15 TIAc
150
17
2,550
1
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 TIAc
120
17
.2,040
1
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bu/ac
100
17
1,700
1171
1
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
3.2
320
1
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
3.2
320
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
0.6
60
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T/Ac
100
0.6
60
3
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
6.1
610
3
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
6.1
610
1201
1
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAs
100
8.8
880
1
EnB
t FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
8.8
880
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
3.8
380
2
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
3.8
380
3
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
7.3
730
3
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
7.3
730
4
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
4.2
420
4
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
4.2
420
5
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
7
700
5
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
7
700
6
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
6.8
680
6
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
6.8
430
7
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
4.3
430
7
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 T1Ac
100
4.3
430
8
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
5
500
8
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
5
500
4754
1
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
8.3
830
1
EnB
FescuelPasture
2 T1Ac
100
8.3
830
2
HwB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
11.5
1150
2
HwB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
11.5
1150
3
HwB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
2.3
230
3
HwB2
FescuelPasture
2 TIAc
100
2.3
230
a , , ,

19300
1
HwB2
Corn Silage
15 T1Ac
150
1.6
240
1
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 T1Ac
120
1.6
830
1
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bulac
100
1.6
160
2
Me B2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TlAc
100
3
300
2
Me B2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TlAc
100
3
300
3
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc
100
3.1
310
3
McB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs
100
3.1
310
4
HwB2
Com Silage
15 T1Ac
150
3.4
510
4
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 TIAc
120
3.4
408
4
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bulac
100
3.4
340
5
McB2
Cam Silage
15 TIAc
150
13.7
2055
5
McB2
Small Grain Silage
8 T1Ac
96
13.7
1315.2
5
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bulac
100
13.7
1370
6
McB2
Corn Silage
15 T1Ac
150
11.5
1725
6
McB2
Small Grain Silage
8 TIAs
96
11.5
1104
6
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bulac
100
11.5
1150
1234
5
HwB2
Com Silage
15 T1Ac
150
34.6
5190
5
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 TIAc
120
34.6
4152
5
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bulac
100
34.6
3460
A

Gerald Foster
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Realistic
PAN
Acres
Lbs. N
Type
Yield
Utilized
19525
1
McB2
Corn Silage
15 TIAc
150
10.2
1530
1
McB2
Small Grain Silage
8 T1Ac
96
10.2
979.2
1
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bulac
100
10.2
1020
19560
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAs
100
4.2
420
1
EnB
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc
100
4.2
420
2
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAc
100
7.5
750
2
HwB2
Fescue/Pasture
2 TIAr-
100
7.5
750
435
1
McB2
Corn Silage
15 TIAs
150
12.8
1920
1
McB2
Small Grain Silage
8 TIAs
96
12.8
1228.8
1
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bulac
100
12.8
1280
2
McB2
Com Silage
15 T/Ac
150
3.8
570
2
McB2
Small Grain Silage
8 TIAs
96
3.8
364.8
2
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bulac
100
3.8
380
3
McB2
Com Silage
15 TIAc
150
23.1
3465
3
McB2
Small Grain Silage
8 T1Ac
96
23.1
2217.6
3
McB2
Soybeans
35 Bulac
100
23.1
2310
623
1
McB2
Corn Silage
15 T1Ac
150
2
300
1
McB2
Small Grain Silage
8 Tlac
96
2
192
1
McB2
Soybeans
35 bulac
100
2
200
2
HwB2
Corn Silage
15 TIAc
150
3.6
540
2
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 Tlac
120
3.6
432
2
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bulac
100
3.6
360
3
HwB2
Com Silage
15 TIAc
150
60.6-
9090
3
HwB2
Small Grain Silage
10 Tlac
120
60.6
7272
3
HwB2
Soybeans
43 Bulac
100
60.6
6060
Total
651.6
177,585 2 year rotation
Number of Cows_ -200.X 76 lbs of Nlcow amount of N produced lyr
15,200
Amount of Nitrogen produced in
2 years
30,400
Deficit of N
147,185

0
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
GTraldfoster
La -Foster Farm
�3a�o CDa J
Cleveland NC 27013
Farm Number: 80 - 25
Dear Gerald Foster:
September 6, 2000
W X �Alk ZV
NOR-rW CAR6Z1t4A,tDBftkPJTMEN-r OR
ENVIRONM N ANDNATURAL RESOURCES
QU&11 Y SECTIOtV
r:c-�'is�'11�r�c F�rmrtfin�
You are hereby notified that La -Foster Farm, in accordance with G.S, 143-215.1 OC, must apply for coverage under
an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
retumed within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed packa+;c should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Stephanie Milam at [phone] extension 544 or
Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely, Q,
40"
t
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Maif Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper