800014_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
February 14, 2018
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Robert Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury, NC28147-8147
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
RECEIVED/NCDENR/DWR
FEB 2 0 2018
WQROS
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Miller Farm
Permit Number AWC800014
Rowan County
Dear Permittee,
As of this date, our records indicate that the above -referenced permit issued to your facility has
overdue fees. It is both a condition of your permit and required by Rule 15A NCAC 2T A 105(e) (2) to pay
the annual administering and compliance fee within thirty (30) days of being billed by this Division.
The followine invoices are outstandine:
Invoice Number
Due Date
Outstanding Fee $
2017PROO2881
5/7/2017
180
Failure to pay the fee accordingly may result in the Division initiating enforcement actions, to
include the assessment of civil penalties. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a
recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water Resources who may issue
a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person"
who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under
authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. Therefore, it is imperative that you submit the appropriate fee as requested
within thirty (30) days of this Notice of Deficiency.
Please remit the payment, made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), in the above amount. Please include Permit Number on your check and mail this
payment to:
Division of Water Resources — Budget Office
Attn: Teresa Revis
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
-contd-
<��Nothirtg Compares 7- _, ..
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Animal Feeding Operations
Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
Vey
Debra J. Watts, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation, and
Ground Water Protection Branch
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
WQROS Central File (Permit No AWC800014)

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
March 13, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Robert Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury, NC28147-8147
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
RECEIVEDINCDENR/DWR
MAR 16 2017
WQROS
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Miller Farm
Permit Number AWC800014
Rowan County
Dear Permittee,
As of this date, our records indicate that the above -referenced permit issued to your facility has
overdue fees. It is both a condition of your permit and required by Rule 15A NCAC 2T .0105(e) (2) to pay
the annual administering and compliance fee within thirty (30) days of being billed by this Division.
The following invoices are outstanding:
Invoice Number
Due Date
Outstanding Fee $
2016PR002594
5/6/2016
180
Failure to pay the fee accordingly may result in the Division initiating enforcement actions, to
include the assessment of civil penalties. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a
recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water Resources who may issue
a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person"
who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under
authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. Therefore, it is imperative that you submit the appropriate fee as requested
within thirty (30) days of this Notice of Deficiency.
Please remit the payment, made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), in the above amount. Please include Permit Number on your check and mail this
payment to:
Division of Water Resources — Budget Office
Attn: Teresa Revis
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
-contd -
- '`'Nothing Compares"'.--,_
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Animal Feeding Operations
Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
C�" J..
Debra J. Watts, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation, and
Ground Water Protection Branch
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
WQROS Central File (Permit No AWC800014)

I L LEA
74�'Fi k rA
go
Awc $o00
0 W 0 CO0n
►'LEf
Lar(4
(2
rn a
,,A le oe
a bo v e
-Pr eRl',q r J8
mJ
dut `ci
�4au r +_ns r
NO a�
�a occou.j
ov,
w0s e.
w i L r
(j-r4 4L&
- ro- b aa- j
POLCA,
,-
i
C7� �` AuiNii Protection

n
-.ter
A' 7'
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Robert L. Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
Dear Mr. Miller:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
September 30, 2010
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2010-PC-1045
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Miller Farm/Facility 80-14
General Permit AWC800014
Rowan County
On September 24, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), .Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Miller Farm and the permitted waste disposal system.
We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation T:
Failure to notify the Division of Water Quality of emergency situations (inadequate storage
capacity in the Storage Pond) as required by permit. Failure to notify DWQ is a violation of
General Permit Condition III.13, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
In the future, report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office or the Division of
Emergency Management as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any emergency event in accordance with the
permit.
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action, please
submit a written response to this Notice by October 15, 2010. Please include in your response
all actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future.
Division of Water Quality 1 Aquifer Protection Section I Mooresville Regienal Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Caro€ina 2B115
Phone: [phone] l Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Fnuai O000rtunity S Affirmative Action Emolover
NorthCarolina
;Vaturallty

n
Miller Farm/Facility 8044
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
September30,2010
Page 2
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment
of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority
of North Carolina General Statute 143-21 S.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated September 24, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWC800014
Regional Permit File AWC800014
jb

ra
s
E Division of Water Quality
j� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 800014 Facility Status: Active Permit: APJC800014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cemi)lignre Insoection
Reason for Visit: Rputin
Inactive or Closed Date:
County: Rowan Region: Mooresville_____
Date of Visit: 09/24/2010 Entry Time:05-00 PM Exit Time: 06:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Miller Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Robert. L Miller Phone: [phone]
Wailing Address: 3510 Miller Rd SaljsburyNO 2 147
Physical Address: 315 Weaver Rd Salisbury INC 28147 __ _ _-
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ® Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude:35°36'35 _ Longitude: 50°36'00
Located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Weaver Rd. (SR 1535) and Miller Rd (SR 1509) General location: southeast of
Millbridge.
Question Areas:
jj pischarges & stream Impacts ji Waste Collection & Treatment R Waste Application
jj Records and Documents ij Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert Luther Miller
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 987235
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bsak Phone: [phone]
Ext.21
Inspector Signature:
Date:fgl* 24 _r'Z10
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
08,'18110 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.32 Lbs11000 Gallons
02/23/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.22 Lbs11000 Gallons
08119/10 > Soil Analysis
31. Weekly Freeboard records indicate that the maximum waste level in the Storage Pond was exceeded from February through
March, 2010. Failure to notify DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit; NOV tc follow.
C.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 09I2412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Nilk Caw 200 72
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280.000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Dato Designed Freeboard observed Freeboard
Pond I POND1 I I I 30.00I 48.00I.
Page: 2

1
Permit: AVVC800014 Owner - Facility: Raltert L Miller Facility Number
: 600014
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n ■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a Was conveyance man-made?
n ❑
■
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n ❑
■
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
in In
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge frem any part of the operation?
n ■
n
n
3 Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n ®
n
n
discharge? '
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n ■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large trees, severe
n ■
n
in
erosion, seepage, etc,)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n ■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n ®
n
n
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
n
n
dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n ■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n ■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect applicaUon?
n ■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zr, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800014 owner • Facility: Robert L Miller
Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 09/2412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason For Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Waste Application
n
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 ibs.?
n_
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay, Pas(ure)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Crop Type 3 Barley, Oats)
Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crap Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n■nn
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? H
ann
I& Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination.
n■nn
Hann
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Yes No NA NE
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? Hann
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Hann
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
n
WUP?
Page 4

j
Permit: AVVC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller
Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
In
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n ®n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
In
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
171
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDCS only)?
In
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n ■ In In
23. If selected, did the facility fait to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? n n ® n
24 Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n ® n In
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n n ® n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n ®n n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n n ® o
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n ®n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ®n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page. 5

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Mider
Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 0912412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Rcutine
Yes No NA NE
Other Issues
31 Did the facility fail to notify regional DVVQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32 Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlmspection with on -site representative?
33 Does facility require a follew-up visit by same agency?
®nnn
0 M D 0
n®nn
Page: 6

AMA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED September 30, 2010
Robert L. Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2010-PC-1045
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Miller Farm./Facility 80-14
General Permit AWC800014
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Miller:
On September 24, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Miller Farm and the permitted waste disposal system.
We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure to notify the Division of Water Quality of emergency situations (inadequate storage
capacity in the Storage Pond) as required by permit. Failure to notify DWQ is a violation of
General Permit Condition 1II.13, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation 1.
In the future, report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office or the Division of
Emergency Management as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any emergency event in accordance with the
permit.
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action, please
submit a written response to this Notice by October 15, 2010. Please include in your response
all actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future.
Division of Water Quality 1 AquiterProtection Section ! Mooresv*e Regional Office One
610 fast Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Nor lit Carolina
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6745 }�
Intemet: www.ncwaterquality.org Adff alliY
An Equal Opportunity t Affirmative Action Employer

ti
L_ F, r �
L_ i L
LMiller Farm/Eacit!ty 80-14
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
September 30, 2010
Page 2
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment
of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle. or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated September 24, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWC800014
Regional Permit File AWC800014
jb

s
E Division of Water Quality
j'1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: NQQ14 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC600014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection_ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Rw n Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 09124/2010 Entry Time:05-00 PM Exit Time: 06:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Miller Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Robert L Miller
Phone:[phone] _
Mailing Address: 3510 Mil1er Rd Salisbury NC 28147
Physical Address: 315 Weaver Rd Saiisbu[y14
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant
Location of Farm:
0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude:35°36'35" Longitude:80°36'00"
Located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Weaver Rd. (SR 1535) and Miller Rd (SR 1509).General location: southeast of
Millbridge.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
jj Waste Collection & Treatment jj Waste Application
ji Other issues
Certified Operator: Robert Luther Miller Operator Certification Number: 987235
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be Phone: [phone]
Ext.21e,2
Inspector Signature: Date:
24 '0a10
Secondary Inspector(s):
( IF
Inspection Summary:
08/18/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.32 Lbsl1000 Gallons
02/23/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 0,22 Lbs/1000 Gallons
08/19/10 > Soil Analysis
31. Weekly Freeboard records indicate that the maximum waste level in the Storage Pond was exceeded from February through
March, 2010. Failure to notify DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit; NOV to follow.
Is
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800014 Owner -Facility: Robert L Nlilter Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle -Milk Cow 200 72
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start pate Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond
POND1
30.00
48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AVVC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number : 800014
Inspection Date: 0912412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Cl ■ n n
Discharge originated at
Structure fl
Application Field n
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n ❑ ■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge? '
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed ((e.1large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
n
n
or cfosure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
fl
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
Cl
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding* n
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zr, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
n
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? n
Total P205? n
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? n
Outside of acceptable crop window? n
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? n
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Fescue (Flay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
all Grain
Bartey, Oats)(Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
❑
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 4

Permit: AVVC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n n
23. If sefected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■ n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous Iess assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional Air n ■ DO
Quality representative immediately.
Page; 5

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert C Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fait to notify reg+onai DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ■ 0 0 Cl
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? f_1 ■ Q n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Cl ■ ❑ 0
Page: 6

E�y
►,a
r
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
July 11, 2017,
Robert L. Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
FALFR—oYCOOPER
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Miller Farm/Facility 80-14
General Permit AWC800014
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Miller:
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
On June 30, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Miller Farm and the permitted
waste disposal system. We. wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the
inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jam s B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated June 30, 2017
jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 26115
704-663-1699

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number; 800014 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 06130/2017 Entry Time: 01:00 pm
Farm Name; Miller Fans
Active
Permit: AWC800014
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Rowan Region:
Exit Time: 2:30 pm Incident #
Owner Email:
Owner: Robert L Miller Phone:
Mailing Address: 3510 Miller Rd Salisbury NC 28147
Physical Address: 315 Weaver Rd Salisbury NC 28147
Facility Statue: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator;
❑ Denied Access
Mooresville
704-857-9887
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 36' 35" Longitude: 80° 36' 00"
Located in the northeast comer of the intersection of Weaver Rd. (SR 1535) and Miller Rd (SR 1509).General location: southeast
of Millbridge.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Robert Luther Miller Operator Certification Number: 987235
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s); Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Robert L. Miller Phone : [phone]
Primary ins
Inspector
Secondary
Inspection Summary:
04/07/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.29 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/13/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.53 Lbs11000 Gallons
12/01/14 > Soil Analysis
Phone: [phone] F,d
Date!
Facility Operator currently in the process of coordinating with Rowan SWCDINRCS to develop and implement a plan for closure.
24. Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
ib
page: 1

Permit: AWC80OC14 Owner - Facility : Robert L Miller Facility Number: 600014
Inspection Date: 06/30/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
-71 Cattle - Milk Cow 200 0
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSt_W: 280,000
Waste Structures
Dlsignated Observed .
Type Identifier Closed Date Stark Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond POND1 30.00 48.00
page: 2

r!,
Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility : Roberti- Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 06/30/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
198 N2 Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
El'
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ M
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
Cl E
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
Z Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑ ..
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &Treatment
Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
MOD
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
.❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
You No Na Na
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑ .
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC800014 Owner -Facility : Robert L Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 06/30/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 1
Cam (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
(Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 4
Soybeans
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑ .
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑l.
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Cl
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC800014 Owner.- Facility: RobertL Miller Facility Number: 800014
inspection Date: 06/30/17 . Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Ne He
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
[]
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment.
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0
❑ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ E
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels.
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑„
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
IN ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ E ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ N ❑ ❑
page: 5

i
F�LE
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Robert L. Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
Dear Mr. Miller:
September 2, 2015
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Miller Farm/Facility 80-14
General Permit AWC800014
Rowan County
On March 25, 2015, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Miller Farm and the permitted
waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the
inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
J Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated March 25, 2015
Jb
Mooresville Regional Office, 610 East Center Avenue, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] Internet, www,nedenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— Made In part by recycled paper

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
800014
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWC800014 [] Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County:
Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit:
03/25/2015 EntryTime: 01:00 pm ExltTime: 2:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Miller Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Robert L Miller
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address:
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Physical Address:
315 Weaver Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑
Nat Compliant Integrator.
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35° 36' 35" Longitude: 80° 36' 00"
Located in the northeast
corner of the intersection
of Weaver Rd. (SR 1535) and Miller Rd (SR 1509).General location: southeast
of Millbridge.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert Luther Miller Operator Certification Number: 987235
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Robert L. Miller Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Robert L. Miller Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Beal phone: [phone] Exl _
Inspector Signature: Date: �C
Secondary Inspectors):
Inspection Summary:
01/13/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.53 Lbs11000 Gallons
07130/14 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.26 Lbs11000 Gallons
12/01/14 > Soil Analysis
jb
page: 1

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility : Robert 1 Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 03/25/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 200 61
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures Observed
Disignated
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond POND1 30.00 48.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC800014 Owner -Facility: Roberti -Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 03/25/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that•reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes_
No No He
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? ,
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
'M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na He
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility : RobertL Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 03/25/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 4
Soybeans
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or Operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ M ❑-
❑
Records and Documents
rep
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

M
Permit: AWC800014 Owner- Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 03/25/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
lee No Na N
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
[]
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ M
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ 0
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
110
❑
Other Issues
You No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
.If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
■ ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

Water Resources
- ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Robert L. Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
bear Mr. Miller:
PAT MCCRORY
ry '� Governor
DONALDD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN .
Direclor .
December 19, 2016
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Miller Farm/Facility 80-14
General Permit AWC800014
Rowan County
On November 17, 2016,' staff of the North Carolina Division: of Water Resources (D)NIR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Miller Farm 'and the ' permitted
waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the
inspection.
The enclosed report should: be self-explanatory; however, should_ you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone];
Sincerely,
J ealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional, Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance inspection Report dated November 17, 2016
jb .

Division of Water Resources
'Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:;,
800014
Facility Status: Active Permit `AWC800014
[] Denied Access . •'
Inpsectlon Type-
Compliance Inspection
inactive Or Closed Data:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Rowan Region:
Mooresville
Date of Visit:
11/17/2016 Entry Time:
03:00 pm Exit Time: 4:30 pm Incident
Farts Name:
Miller Farm '
Owner Email:
Owner:
Robert L Miller
Phone:
704-857-9887
Mailing Address:
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Physltal Address:
315 Weaver Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Facility Status:
0Compliant
Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 36' 35" Longitude: 80' 36' 00"
Located in the northeast comer of the intersection of Weaver Rd. (SR 1535) and Miller Rd (SR 1509).General location: southeast
of Miilbridoe.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Robert Luther Miller Operator Certification Number: 987235
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative($): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Robert L. Miller Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary: .
04/07/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.29 Lbsl1000 Gallons
01113/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.53 Lbs11000 Gallons
12101I14 > Soil Analysis
Phone: [phone] Exl
Date: 4
24. Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
!b
:., ... r �. .... page 1 .
w a'^.','^ti� ''. C, t e a. :r, [.,' 7t�-u •.r F at'-. :cr ..+! 4'^-ia H ��i:
!
�r A ... - ; r f ... .... � '",5,- ...ti *+1.4 .4.-.. ..... ..-„ , .. ., ..'�n���

Permit:. AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller Faality Number: 800014
inspection Date: 11117118• Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity' ' Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle ','Milk Cow " 200 0
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: . 266,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond POND1 . 30.00 48.00
.r�..J. M..�y;,.,,�..--�,,.,.��— - ... _�-.. _ ..�.- -.w .�...�-..- a- � ��.,.,�-Mywy+. •'_ .✓-. -.���s.�:+.s.la.._.. - -. ...v.. ir..-. .-_ _. �..r :w _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ ___ __`rr .
- ,'..:,... - 4.�:' :«.. � _�:,' -,., _,, �'- l �-_..., -..c.« - — 4-�...ra,..,.x , uw� h�.,w�i.w" we e r- •�i� Lww_ ...e.. :',rzsf, - �-.'�%r`xMl+ .�:;�!�,•.n!uw'.x' _u
•'; .. ,s 1 ..� � . s.., �. ., t�''. ... �..,1,. .,y-r.. t `i.�-.7s�,ws� T�'_'�'"'�c• .,. nr:.'-"�tiYT9�-..i r�Jr r:

A
Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility : Robertl Miller Facility Number. ' - 800014
Inspection Date: 11/17/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine;
Dischar ies & Stream lm )acta Yes No NtL Na
1As any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑
b: Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
1:10
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Stora e & T a
Yes No NA No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large
❑
■ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a .
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the,structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
[�
❑
8. Do any of -the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
[]
❑
❑
to roofed pits;.dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
. ❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
PAN >A 0%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑ : .
Evidence of wind drift?
❑ ; ;''
Application outside of application area?
❑
r
page:: , 3
_y._'Y{�3--i..• "'�., ,-.. .. '.:"� .:3 ,.ti3, ( •.1 ! 5} ;
.F -p} i ? �s-•�',.. �-R�:..S ..r J4 .�i -
-,. -ur 7,; wp+ �a—.. c.•h». '' - .. '�— .72'e"
,y���, a.r.+�. .:I

L.
Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility : Robert L Miller Facility Number. 800014 .
inspection Date: .11/17/1.6 Inpsection Type:: Complianoe Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
lflfaate AQotication Yea No Na Na
Crop Type 1 CiOM (Shape)'
Crop Type 2 ' , Fescue (Hay; Pasture) ;
Crop Type 3 Small Grain (Wheat, Barley.
Oats)
Crop Type 4 Soybeans
Crop Type 5
Crop,Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
ME]
El
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ '
❑
-❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents'
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑
El
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAMP readily available?
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below'.
WUP7
❑
Checklists?
❑
`
Design?
❑
Maps? ..
0
Lease Agreements?
❑
'
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis? _
❑
; .
_ .--_Waste:Transfers?-_,_--_- _ ...-'- . - . ....... _ ..._ ,---
_ ._.... r, — .-❑
.... .....
-- ..
Weather code?
0,
'
- - -- - T ---'--Rainfall? — ,-_ -. _ .. -.-.. : _,. _._
= : ❑
_ -
v _
Stocking?
' ❑
-
wd : c.11'.fi•--.iYI W t�l .... :S- s-Y-'3L. l..l ],. .f: 4hA1'. .:.i:rk ..-3
ws
;Cv.J.»-.4•.u.:-.. -
;: _ .'P
-"•."'�.: t r '^'i~ T�•�.Ai "x

Permit AWC800014 Owner - Facility : Robertl-Miller Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 11/17/16 Inpsection Type: Compiiance Inspection Reason for Vsit:.
800014
Routine
Records and DDcumenta
-Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ■
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fall to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0
1113
❑
25. Is the facility -out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ 0
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA.for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
28. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
NoD
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑

Type of Visit: ,Compliance Inspection V Operation Review U Structure Evaluation V Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: # Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergeng 0 Other 0 Denied Access
--- ���1 - - -- - - IPIII UI ILIII�
Date of Visit: [ l Arrival Time: ' cZJ Departure Time: a r ounty: Region:
Farm Name: �v �,� `I W Owner Email:
Owner Name: {`�''''�� L a �/1� Phone: .
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:'•
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number-
Longitude:
a
� I 5 1
L.'i V� � f+�. T,.
I 1 �
1
�`'"•
� Y�'I
+1 I nI
ise
*1
UP 3
1
��
■
��
r
�,,,r
,p
MOM
1
--
°�—r�4w
r• s''y 3v'j ef45�1 aSiyC'
{�haa ';1 �'-ti hkyelawr:
lb
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ A ❑ NE
;5
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes- ❑ A ❑ NA
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from „any part of the operation? ❑ Y No ❑ NA F NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No NA . ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? j4
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number:.
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Struc e 1
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate a m egrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes`` ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes O ❑NA ❑NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Y NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, e
PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs.
❑.Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
12. Crop Type(s): '
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Aperoved Area
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irri ahon design or wettable
acres determination? __.._-.
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
[] Yes �NA
❑ Yes, [] NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes Eg"Na— ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
esign aps ease Agreements Other:
21. D es record keeping need imrrement? If yes, check.the- _� Hate box below.Wrans
❑ NA ❑ NEanteApplicatio y F�inut6
_.._ .
reeboard-ante-Analysis " oil Analysis &WeaZer' Code
&Rainfal! Stocking rap Yield 12nspections onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Ye a ❑❑ NSA ❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [] Yes ❑ No � --A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

w
r
:� Facili Number: - Date of
24. Did the facility fail to calibratg wiWte ap2lLiication equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of comp lance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
No
NA ❑ NE
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of fast survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ Noajj)t--�NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animal with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes Na NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher an normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of e as required by the
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
/ 1
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
0 0�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
❑ Y
Cam -
Phone:
NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Type of Visit: 6 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance. ,
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: unty: ""V Off- Region:qe
'
t ��•
Farm Name: � 4 � Owner Email:
Owner Name: �y �` '� L Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: A Integrator:
-RoCertified Operator: r rv" Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design_ Curient''.
Y Design Gilrrent
Design�CurI
m 'Swine
C p ity Pop.
Vet Poultry,
Cap cityx `Pop.
C e
Capaci o
a•...sG
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
s
Wean to Feeder
Nan -La er
aiI Calf
Q;
Feeder to Finish
i'' '"`'a
Dairy Heifer;
# Farrow to Wean
x Design : Gur ent
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
�D RI'oult �
act .'. P,a
Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
•Ca
Beef Stocker
p
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
;��Otherw.
Other
I j
Turkey Poults
I 10ther
s
.aQca.,«.a...: �.,mn�o-�a�s.c�w�ww..w�s,.-
+.xxs,:iaa..r�a�.b-n-a.:.„aza,aw�w...:wrwYn„xewaan..,,:e
a-'....
F...n;.,_•a1n..
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance Iran -made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes _kNoll
NA ❑ NE
❑Yes [:]No ❑NE
[:]Yes [:]No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass.the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Noo�FEI]
A ❑ NE
3. Were there an observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Y �4oNA NE
Y p p p ❑ � ❑
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is siorage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �Bvd_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
d�
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yeses' ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures. lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) E
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ~❑ Yes N NA [] NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes�':Q'I�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. , ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil _.
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wi d Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Cod' 4� _ C �ol
13. Soil Type(s): Q 0
-- -
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑Yeso
❑ NA.
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
D Yes�.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yesja<
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents ~�
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
ec is s Lease Agreements ❑other-
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement?. If yes, check the appropriate box below. ga_s�teTWranss
D NA ❑ NE
Waste Application eekly Freeboard aste Analysis Soil Analysis eather Code
infall tocking rop Yield Minute Inspections �onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permits Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No �❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YeS:1a; roo ❑❑ NNA� ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No �! A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-ap cation)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. a an ted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes � Nc
❑ Yes�10
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comiments (refer to`questron #):Ezplam any YES answers and/ror any:adchtionaCrecommepdahons o anyather comments.
Use drawrngs,°of facility ta,better.;explaiia.situations,:(use;a[lditional,pages as necessary).A
/ c�b
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

i
r
MillerFar � ����bc�
c rT 2 4
LI
NCDENR MRO f
Robert Miller DWC -A uifer Protection
655 Weaver Road
Salisbury, NC 28147 j
Facility No. 80-14
Rowan County, North Carolina
Certified Animal Waste r
Management Plan
(0200 Certification. Plan) r
i
For a herd size of: '
200 Milk Cows
In Cooperation with the
Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
NC DENR - DSWC
February 12, 2003
RECEIVED 1 DENR 1 DVVQ
Aquifer Protertion Section
AUG 13 2009

3::4 +A LL DR, u+t. 0 `C �H' � 4f x6R:.w
n, -
I GDODNIGHT. R o o
L' LI AN E pp o sP Ewo'
Farm Location Map
Miller Dairy
Facility No. Bald i
f 50 Fo
u -£ c�w00
0
Robert Miller
- a FAR 655 Weaver Rd. /
NNI 4 �O� MILLERS CH A Salisbury, NC 28147
Uc coop R �� I
De't, '� I
AN 84 � ,` co � ��
n;
RC' • RE5 �fQ� D. P ,: s p r _ R
w ILL RID
Q CO o n rn UH
C�1R1 OPER o d SIO
y'V f' FMMA -a 44
TAMMY R6C/yglY
s FLF Y
- moo.., � ...-_. __., � .....� , --' oy ".GRACE gqY Cy v �'4i•-
SE_ '--- , ` - � �• � I
dog J
P� �� �p ✓ p KNOLL Vl y y ioDR
�' 5
601 - I
CY F� w P •F � 2.,� Q Eft
RD jrRD.
x QQ• �Q. /# �` `� RD Vim` yFF �`� a 5 G Lk fN DUKE D
'EF Lp 'DEAL _ Co ti� ` '^.,_ CoR WA
D. WILSON y m / P WE88 -F3D.
�� �� / �y h
w
p�� Q r5 Epp PGy�}� }yAV n.r S 4.0 f CfR.DR.
7' / a�,�.� �' � -..,�, •yb �- Oct
LIJ
G$ R WEAVER RD
o �� d U �� t", �( i MILTON
. IV �O G
ST. 1
,i c p Qo a �::', - _ -;�I�.,C. y Bus 29 !3[hQQvELDER R05EMONT I5E"
ti 1 o RAY � ,O r Y g s RU. �� cF4, RQ CRq Ic
P _ FROk DANLEY o C
� DRf
[ ER$ON S r/ / _ IER� F CRUSE
RN CIR. O \
152 �� y N �� z Q CF KS.
¢ m 5
r� Ajy� I RDLGREEN.OD ` �R( E TWP .\ J GROVEI�Go g" d o.Na
/ y
0�1�. pA P�- BRIAA '�� 1' r.r �4 �v �£N �_E'Hi':L G'rJ p�✓;� K'� --_ C�44pG
153 a✓ ---j s. /N F D- 4, O• ` A
�`
i
.1
-
5�
fR� �Pm T �g II fbA Q �� o OAS TREX RD
P� RUTLEDGE c? c I Lr 1I .J 4 U G o �� s 1
J fRCY 7
yER rY o RD. T C rRD. LC 1 MK r
S
<w°°CK ROLE
Drn
4tEVIN SL00p O w © b
ST._,ti ,�' i RD,
zz � �i OLD `� gEA �� F �':° _`r •
/
i_ FAG R
iL KANNAP�JLI�� ��� sE C+R. _ �. •_,� F-
o o Iy /
RQITMAN0. E. VA
29
i -
ALT
6
b DR O
C A B A R R U S

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Miller Farm
Robert Miller
655 Weaver Road
China Grove, NC 28023
704-857-3031
02-12-2003
This plan has been developed by:
C. Lipe Barrier, Jr., Environmental Spec. II
DSWC
444 Bristol Dr.
Statesville, NC 28677-2942
704-873-6761 Ext. 3
jV
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
.
Plan Approved By:
e. ` ` a A v
PP
Technical Specialist Signature Date
----------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
124238 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-12-2003 Cover Page I
RECEIVED 1 DENR 1 DWQ
Aquifer PrOpntion Section
AUG, 13 2009
pt�

i
Tract and Field Listing i
Miller Farm }
Irene H., Robert and Mike Miller
Field Number Total Acres Broadcast Acres Irrip-ated Acres Land Use
Tract 19016
1
36
11.4
Cropland '
1 A
6.3
6.3 Cropland
113
6.2
6.2 Cropland'
1 C
6.2
6.2 Cropland
1D
5.9
5.9 Cropland
2e
33.0
33.0
Cropland
20
33.0
33.0
Cropland
1 g
8.4
8.4
Hayland ,
3
3.2
3.2
Hayland
4
3.2
3.2
Hayland
5
17.1
17.1
Cropland
6
8.1
8.1
Cropland
7
12.8
12.8
Hayland
8
3.3
3.3
Cropland,
Tract 19022
1
4.5
4.5
Pasture
2
1.4
1.4
Pasture
3
4A
4.4
Pasture
4
3.0
3.0
Pasture
5
8.1
8.1
Pasture
6
6.2
6.2
Pasture

1
D
I
E
t
}
'M. Location Map}
Miller Dairy
Facili r No. 84-14 {
Robert Miller
655 'Weaver Rd.
Saiisbury, NC 281475�7
} E
MY F f
- w;,o
grA U
'
R 1 . y1� .k q^� ➢X "1i _

A 4-
z I',�'•'` F wf ,� w ; t+. Soil Survey
51, u f
a�
biller Dairy
:j,j'rR. �r�t; ��t°`+1.•;r'�r�► r �.j �IT y�}:��::PJ.--^� 1• y
Facility No. 80-14
y,b 4 31
r" �i.�.:JS� y"V' ».�s,,. r•� *�� fix, Y! �^I�
Robert
Miller
' fu ga!rd ,' 655 'Weaver Rd. i
�r r
'' y< '� ��r ^` r 1 r Salisbury, NC 28147
Y- �� �S; r '�9i"^�� ` 1"" •�'�Eq s!'1��� ��, s a��'��f r', ;'�°iW1 �••t-r .�
yw` �'� +++'�YS�"" fi�rG � �;ii 1 � N •.w h f i Sls rJ✓ - —'-'
,�,i�T�4, �i `l�, .' n 4� • r../Y ,J�� r, 1 'f •.��'I ' ^''� {Vy+�1 � �,;y'. � Y'!` ,�q„� y'�,jy }.�1,Bz , � , ,-'. , , � Ir.
i�yJ 1Y[9s�'• �!. •' ']j�. � 'r�.'h�.'w''�. J� '�'? J � y,7jf�r{ir rj�'�`irSit`t�h�csl�, f " A'"ta 1 1 ,A+•�;=�1'f";e,r�iJ•, ��
,;i ,C w . yrr , ;, ..,i:,• u. e
�. y} �. � 3" �S -•J�,i ,Irk , , +•, , r .�
•z7 - �' Jl --- -��' S',�: r ,r ti .: �'tr� r i spa �. F� •°31 _.�
pry- _ ,f. i{ -•�'+b .:-'J--• _ 7 L. '�'�'�t'
�� jn � 'e .-, 1� ` � . `� ". � i*z' �,� �� r + ��[!� S � `7�R�� ' ! '� �'� 4 ',r .. .., ',... i • �� � __,,,Y��.r�'. 'pY ���N yF 1: .'* �'.
Mrll
" 31A'r��s1d s1 !!,:r h.�r510 -- I
4' � .3l 1j,2 r f {
R
i[r5!a +
�J
(i• / r' `a;, ' rY+,.t "rRi+�,�7`�"' k!• �.:, L�iiti t ti4y..I atx �•4 ��-. F �a,,.,n, fl+ � ' ,
It.'.11GV F iWN'�, f 3�iF• ''f �' .�3�r 7 1%{qqS. + , � •�=`�F�I fJ Y ;-�,�1� � ti'ffztD lN�'l.- �• � of +�y�p"i!�r'F�9N � ��1 �M^ �� �J4 �1��� I 1 1M:Li r "A'y: '1 1 "' I. � . ",�..- 9v. �_� 5 , rk •i }I � tt. t+w. dvAh, y i;iIP i f,' j'�`i� �.
fY V {n� 7r �1. �• ! iI ,� 1 r %�2 i No, 1
lR�y��1frt
•••}}}{{{��� (�y ; f�n"Iff. y
�;i ;�` l F =� 4r� �ig'J § ai��,w.141 ;pe� .� �.j}"�; �.,.,it-'•
z• !.� 7 t 711'r r 1
IPA
w I� yY �O k. I.•IS Ir•� I
i�r-
FV.f
i 1:, 3�h ,.I, •r t�1:' '�l.� ' ryJl, _ ' ,fL �j k 'h �•,..
.,''1 ,Lyy..F1 � k1+!7l�+.a K� :; r `M '9•' R+��lyi� "� - V 1 'r}t�`� I�Y7'F" r . ,
•A`1
t t '�Kw a�B �a F ri��i>� �}r .. ,rL�l:lS` , ,. ,t � j ir fl � - '� �'y�14'• �.�'' 1 =
T ��`K` �yE ' � 7�P �y }�`,f�� �Y�J{°� ����I "�'� • r ay; � '` �'�,�.' I" u•';' ,� �: � � .� 4: R • ]�� t`:
' I ,(1 k,►�ib •,�f I. r JJ ` yli i' • f 4 ; �- ��'{. '
r
�
51 s1,
�'^ £" t''1J �� a ( �,�!} ,I a � ,�i l p .r ,� t�` � J �w �,' ��,• .��, F Y} � J �
�rllr ti �1�F�' + �3 �' }' 31141
i 3'' r rJ ,, r�, t r 5� ti i s '-! 1
.} ,,+ �� .7 s � ��' i. - -t � +��•��� r'� �A y ! ill i U rfi g$��'. :"1`• >ti�i"�'.!3�' a ` .�.•t��1'
{ }'af r- '8�Vl3L "jtr �` ,s �• �' �,,. ir � � 1 � �` ? It �4. t
• •� �i' J �4 � � J f�4 r,Ji � '� 1 ry •ti1;" •}�t31 z , I � �• �� •.'- �' ,'�� ;k:+
RS��4 Y� i• i,� ��,,,,. rl rl r .7-�il� k 4 �,! 1 ti•�31b2 k �%,.��';,� 3rh� %., W!.
;.F, 4 � j . r; �, � 't�.-. .'�2...r� lr i f y� -r ! i , � a�i .Ja, ,l' �' •'� y .�r
� i� , � kl�L'/•W�•.g. .,y: � �+ Ys. r, _ � D l ���}.,, 4 y •.�,. : 6 '�,�F a. '
..1y+ -^' j* .'�, sFS.!��!'1 'I .n..�' ►'✓�'� '. J, � �" i. ,,, �;� ', � w,l. /`\�u
\ ' •''ti �IDZ

Narrative
The Miller Farm
The Miller Farm is a pardnership by Irene, Mike and Robert Miller. The farm is planned for 200 Milk
Cows.
Additional animals not being milked such as dry cows, heifers and calves are managed at a separate
pastured farm and are not included in this plan.
The Milk herd is managed on pasture 50% of the time and in the feedlot, freestall or milking parlor
the other 50%. The feedlot, and freestall waste is scraped and stockpiled for up to 90 days on the
upper part of the feedlot. The feedlot runoff, storm water, milking parlor wash water and animal
waste flushed from the parlor waiting area are collected and stored in the Waste Storage Pond (WSP)
for up to,180 days. Waste is flushed from the parlor waiting area using recycled water from the WSP.
The waste and wastewater stored in the WSP are disposed of by irrigation on cropland using a
traveler irrigation system. Solids are spread on pasture and cropland.
In the event, that total comfinement is required and all the waste is collected in the WSP, storage
capacity is sufficient to hold waste for 90 days.
It is important on this farm to estabish a history of soil and waste sample results to make the best
use of the nutrient produced on this farm. Slurry waste should be sampled during each irrigation
following agitation of the WSP: Solid waste should be sampled at the time of spreading. Test results are
needed to complete required records for animal waste disposed of. The soil test are required to
monitor the nutrient and mineral levels in the fields used for disposal.
CROP NOTES
The Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) to be applied to crops following soybeans must be reduced by 20 lbs.
due to N carry over. The soft ware does this automaticly, but it should you alter the rotation, you will
need to adjust for your records.
All corn is planned for silage. If the corn is not needed and harvested for grain the PAN must be reduce
by 45%.
If small grains are not needed for silage or hay and harvested as grain, the PAN is nearly the same and
no adjustment is needed. If Small Grain us used for cover crop, only 25 lbs. of PAN can be applied,
and the PAN applied to the following crop must be reduced by 25 lbs.
The symbol* is shown beside some RYE and PAN amounts on the Waste Utilization Tables. Approved
RYE and PAN data for these crops are not available for the soil types they are being grown on. Yield
information from Memorandum by Dr. Jim Green, Chairman of the NC State University Forage
Production Workgroup, dated 5-29-98 was used for Rescue Grass( Matua Grass).
--------------•-------------------------------------------,---------------------------- --- - ----------
124258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 02-12-2003 Narrative Page I of 2

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by
manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be
applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the
total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be
used to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may.require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field
See CROP NOTES in the Narrative Section of Additional Information
Utilization Table
Trait
Field
Source
1.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Cr
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
flbsYA1
Comm.
Fat.
Nitricut
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applio.
Mdhod
Manure
PA
Nidrimt
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid -
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
Ral?A
tolls
1(100 nls
rims
19016
1
L129
Cecil
36.00
11.40
Small Grain. SilagelHay
9.8 Tons
*1011-3131
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.00
25
0.00
29R.66
19016
1
1129
Cecil
36.00
11.40
Sorghum -Sudan Flay
4.3 Tons
*4/1-8131
212
0
0
Broad.
212
0.00
49
0.00
561,42
1901C,
lA
U28
Cecil
6.30
6.30
9.8Tcros
*10/1-3131
109
0
0
lrrip,.
M9
39.78
0
250.61
0.00
19016
l A
L128
Cecil
6.30
6.3E
S+ih �
4,3 Tnis
*411-R/31
212
0
0
!Trip'.
212
77.37
()
497.42
0.00
19016
113
U28
Cecil
6.20
6,20
Sc7
9.8T.'.'
*10/I-3131
109
0
0
Irrip,
104
39.79
0
246.63
0ff)
14016
IEi
L129
Cecil
6.20
6.20
54,-LE4'
4.3Tans
*4I1-R131
212
0
f)
1tti
212
77.37
0
479.68
0.00
19016
IC
1129
C'ceil
6.20
6.20
y,tA1xO"
9.8Tons
*1011-3131
109
0
0
lrriR.
109
39.78
0
246.63
0,()()
19(m,
I C
t 129
Cecil
6.20
6-20
Try .s
4.3 'rotas
*411-Rl31
212
0
(
IrrIQ.
212
77.37
O
479.69
O.iH)
1901(,
11)
U28
Ccci1
5.90
5.9f1
y b0%'
9.8Tems
*10/1-3111
1O9
0
[)
1rrip.
109
39.79
0
234.70
0.00
1901f,
1D
1128
Cecil
5.90
5.40
Ss.�biTas
4.3 Tois
*411-8131
212
0
0
±Trig,
212
77.37
0
45G.47
0.0f1
900,9 4-04 � +...' C- Q "'
7 of
124258 Database Version 2.0 Datc Printed: 2/12/03 - WUT Paec I

Waste Utilization Table
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitro.4n
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm-
Fed.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
gallA
I tons
1000 gals
tons
19016
2 Gr
U29
Cecil
8.00
8.00
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
195
0
0
Broad.
195
0.00
45
0.00
362.39
19016
2 Ev
U29
Cecil
33.00
33.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
* 1011-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
19016
2 Ev
U29
Cecil
33.00
33.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
$5115-9115
144
0
0
Broad
144
0.00
33
0.00
1,103,89
19016
2 Od
U29
Cecil
33.001
33.00
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
2115-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
471
0.00
1,356.18
19016
2 Oct
U29
Cecil
33.00
33.00
Small Gram, SilageJHay
9.8 Tons
*10l1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad,
109
0.00
25
0.00
935.59
19016
3
U29
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Fescue Hay
4.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
186
0
0
Broad.
186
0.00
43
0.00
138.27
19016
4
U28
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Feswe Hay
4.2 Tons
811.7131
186
0
0
Broad
186
253.13
0
910.02
0.00
19016
5
U29
Cecil
17.10
17.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
*10/1-3/31
0
0
0
Broad
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
19016
5
U29
Cecil
17.10
17.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
*5/15-9/15
144
0
0
Broad
144
0.001
33
0.00
572.02
19016
6
U29
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2115-6/30
218
0
20
Broad
198
0.00
46
0.00
372.56
19016
6
U29
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain. Silage/Hay
9.6 Toms
*10/1-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
107
0.00
25
0.00
201.34
19016
7
U29
Cecil
12,80
12.80
Rescuegrass Hay
NIA
8/1-7131
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0,00
19016
8
U29
Cecil
3.30
3.30
Com, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30 1
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47
0.00
155.62
19016
8
U29
Cecil
3,30
3.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
* 1011-3131
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.00
25
0.00
83.56
19022
1
U29
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
34
0.00
153.67
19022
2
U29
Cecil
I.40
1.40
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0 j
Broad,
147
0.00
34
0.00
47.81
19022
3
U29
Cecil
4.40
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1.7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
34
0.00
150.25
19022
4
U29
Cecil
3.00
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
•147
0.00
34
0.00
102.44
19022
5
U29
Cecil
[6.20
8.10
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
911-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
34
0.00
276.60
19022
6
U29
Cecil
6.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
811-7131
153
0
0
Broad.
153
0.00
36
0.00
220.36
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------
993926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 WUT Pate 2

Waste I ltiIization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
1.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Urie.
Acres
Crop
Rl E
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
1
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
16s1A
1000
ga11A
trnrs
1000.Rals
tons
Total Applied 1000 gallons
3,691.84
j
Liquid Manure
Total Produced. 1000 gallons
1,187.27
Balance, 1000 gallons
-2,504.58
r e
Total Applied tonstl
7,182.63
'Manure Solids
Total Produced, touts
` a".." '
850.00
Balance, tons
.�-:�:_ _*F
-6,332.63
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol — means leased. otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
------------- - - --
993926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 WUT Pate 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Aar
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(1bs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
gal/A
tons
1000 gals
I tons .
19016
1
U29
Cecil
36.00
11.40
Small Crain, SilageJHay
9.8 Tons
*101I-3131
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.00
25
0.00
288.66
19016
1
U29
Cecil
36.00
11.40
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
*4/1-8/31
212
0
0
Broad-
212
0.00
49
0.00
561.42
19016
IA
U28
Cecil
6.30
6.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tonc
*10/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irrip,
109
39.78
0
250.61
0.00
19016
1 A
U28
Cecil
6.301
6.30
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
*411-8/31
212
0
-01
Irrig.
212
77.37
b
49T42
0.00
19016
1B
U28
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Small Grain. Silage/Hay
9-8 Tons
*10l1-3/31 1
109
0
0
Irrig,
109
39.78
0
246.63
0.00
19016
113
U28
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
*4/1-8131
212
0
0
Irrig,
212
77.37
0
479AR
0.00
19016
1C
U28
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Small Grant, Silage/Hay
9.9 Tons
*10/1-3131
109
0
0
Irrig-
109
39.78
0
246.63
0.00
19016
IC
U28
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
*411-8131
212
0
0
Irrig.
212
77.37
0
479.69
0.00
19016
1D
U28
Cecil
5.90
5.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
*10/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irrig
109
39.79ii
0
234.70
0.00
19016
ID
U28
Cecil
5.90
5.90
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
*411-8131
212
0
0
hrig.
212
77.37
fl
456.47
0.00
19016
2 Gr
U29
Cecil
8.00
8.00
1 Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
195
0
0
Broad,
195
0.00
45
0.00
362.39
19016
2 Ev
U29
Cecil
33.00
33.00
Small Gram, SilagelHay
9.8 Tons
x 10/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.00
25
0.00
935.59
19016
2 Ev
U29
Cecil
33.00
33.00
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
223
a
20
Broad,
203
0.00
47
0.00
L556.18
19016
2 Od
U29
Cecil
-33.00
33.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.9 Tons
* 10/1-3/31
0
0
0
Broad-
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
19016
2 Od
U29
Cecil
33.00
33.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
*5/15-9115
144
0
0
Broad,
144
0.00
33
0.00
1.103.89
19016
3
U29 I
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Fescue Hay
4.2 Tans
811-7/31
186
0
01
Broad,
186
0.00
43
0.00
138.27
19016
4
U28
Cecil
3.20
3.20
Fescue Hay
4.2 Tons
8/1-7131
186
0
0
Broad.
186
253.13
0
810.02
0.00
19016
5
U29
Cecil
17.10
17.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9,6 "cons
*1011-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
107
0.00
25
0.00
425.04
19016
5
U29
Cecil
17,10
17.10
COM, Silage
20.0 Tons
V15-6130
218
0
20
Broad,
198
0.00
46
0.00
786.52
19016
61
U29 1
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
*10/1-3131
107
0
0
Broad,
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
19016
6
U29
Cecil
8A0
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
*5115-9115
144
0
a
Broad.
144
0.00
33
0.00
270.96
19016
7
U29
Cecil
12.80
12.80
Rescuegrass Hay
N/A
911-7131
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - -------------------------------
993926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 WUT Page 4

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Trail
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre'
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(I!
Comm.
Felt.
Nutrient
Applied
/
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
Pal/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
19016
8
U29
Cecil
3.30
3.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
*10/1-3131
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
19016
8
U29
Cecil
3.30
3.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
*5/15-9115
144
0
0
Broad,
144
0.00
33
0.00
110.39
19022
1
U29
Cecil
4.50
4,50
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
34
0.00
153.67
19022
2
U29
Cecil
1.401
1.40
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
01
Broad.
147
0.00
34
0.00
47.81
19022
3
U29
Cecil
4.40
4.40
Fescue Pasture
4A Tons
8/1-7131
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
34
0.00
150.25
19022
4
U29
Cecil
3.00
3.00
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
911-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
34
0.00
102.44
19022
5
U29
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
34
0.00
276.60
19022
6
U29
Cecil
6,20
6.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/l-7131
153
0
0
Broad.
153
0.00
36
0.00
220,36
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
3,691,94
0 ��.
Liquid Manure
Total Produced. 1000 gallons
I J 87.27
Balance, 1000 gallons
-2,504.58
-N
:`
Total Applied, tons,"
7,390.44
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
850.00
_
Balance, tons
�e �,.=a�
A:.a
-6,540.44
Notes: 1. In the tract column. symbol -means leased otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
------------------------------------------------------------------ - -- ------------------------- --- --- ----------------
993926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 WUT Page 5

Narrative
The Miller Farm Animal Waste Sources
Animal Waste is collected both as liquid slurry and as solids from the same area. In this
plan, 50% colIected as slurry and 'computed using Slurry Tables and 50% is collected as a Solid and
computed using the Surface Scraped tables.
i
U28 - Miller Farm Slurry
Slurry collected as animal waste, surface runoff, wash water, storm storage, and.rainfall
in the Waste Storage Pond
From the Miller Farm Waste Storage fond Design,180 Day Storage, Page 2, Normal Pump out
volume.
1,187,265 gals. animal waste is collected each year and require disposal.
i
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) from this source !
200 dairy cows x 14 gals/cow/day x 50% of source x 50% confinement x 365 days divided by
x 14 lbs N/1000 gals. = 3577 lbs of PAN t
U29 - Miller Farm Solids
Solids are collected and stored on the lot is a stock pile for up to 90 days.
200 Milk Cows x 93 lbs x 50% of source x 50% confinement x 365 days divided by 2000 lbshon
= 849 tons/year.
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) from this source
849 tons x 4.3 lbs/ton = 3649 lbs. of PAN annually
------------•------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
124258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-12-2003 Narrative Page 2 of 2

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U28
Miller Dairy Slurry waste generated 1,187,266 gals/year by a 200 animal
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility
has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
3576
Incorporated
4877
Injected
5527
Irrigated
3251
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
8,491.80
3,691,843
-2,504,577
Year 2
8,491.80
3,691,843
-2,504,577
U29
Miller Dairy Solids waste generated 850.00 tons/year by a 200 animal
Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
3659
Incorporated
4850
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Quantity Applied
(Tons)
Surplus/Deficit (Tons)
Year 1
30,919.50
12,473.52
-11,623.52
Year 2
31,814.10
9,832,39
-8,982,39
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
-- ------------
Note: In source 1D, -S means standard source. U means user defined source.
124258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-12-2003 Source Page 1 of 1

LI
Potential Leachii!&
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
< 2
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
> = 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
< = 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
NutrientManageinent (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
soluble nutrient leaching below the
improve the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency
10
root zone,
should be considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients,
Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such
Fs Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'------------------------
' 24258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-12-2003 PCS Page 2 of 2
iJOT& Symbol * means user entered data.

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field.
Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching index for each
field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
read'lltg
Index ([.1)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
19016
1
36.00
11,40
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
Sorg)ium-Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
19016
IAJ
6.30
6.30
15.0 jCecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 "Ions
19016
113
6.20
6,20
15,0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tems
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
43 Tons
19016
1C
6.20
6.20
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Bay
9.81'011s
Sorglu rn-Sudan Hay
43 funs
19016
ID
5.90
5.90
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, SilageJHay
9.8 Tons
Sorghum -Sudan [[ay
4.3 Tons
19016
2 Chi
8.00
8,00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
19016
2 Ev
33.00
33,00
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silagelliny
9.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 hit.
Com, Silage
20.5 Tons
19016
2 Od
33.00
33.00
15.0
Cecii
Com, Silage
20.5 "roes
Small Grain, Silag&Hay
9.9 Tons
Soybeans, Mimured, Double Crop
37 bu.
19016
3
3,20
3,20
15.0
Cecil
F scue Ilay
.4.2 Tons
19016
4
3.20
3.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.2 Tons
19016
5
17.10
17.10
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silagc/Hay
9.6 Tuns
Soybeans Nfanurcd, Double Crop
37 bit.
Com, Silage
20.0 Tuns
19016
6
8.10
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bit,
19016
7
12.90
12.80
15.0
Cecil
Rescuegrass flay
0.0 Tons
19016
8
3.30
3,30
15.0
Cecil
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
19022
1
4.50
4.50
15.0
lCecil
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
19022
2
1.40
1.40
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
19022
3
4.40
4.40
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Toms
19022
4
3.00
3.00
13.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Toms
19022
5
8.10
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.4'rons
19022
6
6.20
6.2D
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Toms
PLAN TOTALS: 209.90 185.30
-- ------------ - - - - -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - ------- - - - - ----------- - - - - --
24258 Database Vcrsion 2.0 Date Printed: 02-12-2003 PCS Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Trail
I Field
Suil Series
Application Rate
(indieslhour)
Application Amotuit
(indles)
190161
IA
Cecil
0.40
1.0
19016
1 B
Cecil
0.40
1.0
19016
1 C1
Cecil
1 0.401
1.01
19016
1 DI
Cecil
1 0.40
1 it
NOTE: Symbol +means user entered data.
124259 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/ 12103 1AF Page 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the nu►nber of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The
start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first
crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the
design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application
interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste StoraLye C",anacity
Source Name
Miller Dairy Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/15
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
180
1
3
149
1
4
119
1
5
150
1
6
180
1
7
149
1
8
180
1
9
150
1
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
149
2
1
118
2
2
152
2
3
121
2
4
91
2
5
122
2
6
180
2
7
149
2
8
180
2
9
150
2
10
180
2
11
180
2
12
149
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
124258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-12-2003 . Capacity Page i of I

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. 'There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
- ---- -------------------- -------------------
124258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that_the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, .199_5, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
1.2. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 1.00 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
124258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 SMcification Pape 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A
regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with.no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
----------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
124258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 Specification Page 3

21. highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions
require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. - Zinc and copper levels in
the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
----------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
124258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 Specification Pate 4

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Miller Farm County: Rowan,
Address: 3510 Weaver Road, Salisbury, NC 281
Date: 11 /1 /98
Telephone:
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications'
Field
Number 2
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
of Field 3
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
96
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate (h/hr)
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle
(inches) I
Comments
1A
6.3
Cecil
3 to 4
Rye hay and Sudex Hay No -till
0.4
1
1 B
6.2
Cecil
3 to 4
Rye hay and Sudex Ha No -till
0.4
1
1C
6.2
Cecil
R e ha and Sudex Ha No -till
0.4
1
1 D
5.9
Cecil
Rye hay and Sudex Hay No -till
0.4
1
rto
1 Table to be completed in its entirety by soil and water conservation district (SWCD) personnel and forwarded to the irrigation system designer.
2 See attached map provided by the SWCD for Feld location(s).
3 Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
4 Refer to N.C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section iIG
Irrigation Parameters page-1 USDA-NRCS
September 1995 North Carolina

TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: ABI Model 90ATE, With 984 ft. 3 inch OD Hose and Nelson 100 Guru
FieldNo'
and
Hydrant No
--Effective
Travel Lane
Effective.-
Width (ft) Length (ft)_
EQUIPMENT SEETINGS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter
(inches) @ QlReef (psi) Patte
Comments
NEBO
' See attached map provided by the SWCD for Meld iocation(s).
2 Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each Meld.
3 Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TO (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
Irrigation Parameters USDA-NRCS
September 1995 page-2 North Carolina

TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and TyRe of Equipment: NA
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Fteltl No Wetted Hydrant Spacing App0=1on Nozzle Operating
and Number of Diameter Alorsg Betyveen Rate Diameter Pressure Operating Time
Line No � Hydrants {feet) Pipeline Pipelines (inlhr) (incises) a Gun (psi) OHydrant (hr) Commends
See attached map provided by the SWCD for field location(s).
z Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each held.
Irrigation Parameters USDA-NRCS
September 1995 page-3 North Carolina

TABLE 4 - IRRIGATION SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
197
Operating Pressure at Pum psl)
124
Design Precipatation Rate (irdhr)
0.37
Hose Length (feet)
984
XXXXXXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
Computer
YXX)OCXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Electric
PuTp Power Requirement (hp)
30
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications 1
Location
90o Bend
Dead End
THRUST BLOCK
Irrigation Parameters _ .. _ _ ___ _ USDA-NRCS
September 1995 page-4 North Carolina

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name: Henry R. Johnson, Jr. C.I.D
Company: Johson and Company, Inc - -_
Address: PO Sox 122, Advance, NC 27006
Telephone. [phone]
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
The following specifications and computations must accompany all irrigation designs:
1 . A Scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thrust block
locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2 . Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3 . Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4 , Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
5 . Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks.
6 . Specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7 . Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-NRCS specification for Irrigation Water Conveyance, Technical Guide,
Section IV, Code 430-DD.
NOTE: A buffer strip 25 feet wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perenial streams and surface
waters per DENR-DEM Code Section 75A NCAC 2B .0200 - Waste Not Discharged to Surface Waters.
Irrigation Parameters page-5 USDA-NRCS
September 1995 North Carolina

Miller Farm
Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
A. The operator shall check all drains and valves, prior to start of the
system.
B. Set up traveler at the first hydrant, connect valve opening ELL and 4'.'
_ connection hose. Pull out gun cart, but do not pull out more than 950
feet of hose.
C. Open valve by opening LLL on hydrant.
D. Override low/high pressure switch, partially open 3" discharge gate
valve, prime and start pump.
E. Once water begins discharging from the gun sprinkler, slowly open
discharge gate valve, until pressure gauge reads required pressure for
the specific hydrant in use. (Due to elevation and friction loss
differences, pressure at the discharge valve will vary to' attain 70 PSI at
the gun and 109 PSI at the traveler connection.)
F. For equivalent application at the beginning of the travel lane, allow the
gun to discharge for approximately 30 minutes prior to starting travel of
the machine.
G. Set the traveler computer to 3.3 ft./minimum (0.4" application rate) and
start travel mode.
H. Check the traveler and gun for proper operation, making sure no run off
occurs. Recheck traveler frequently.
I. When traveler reaches end of travel lane, allow an additional 30
minutes, before shutting off pump.
J. Close hydrant and move traveler to next travel lane.
K. Allow 3 days minimum, prior to reapplying wastewater to this area.
L. When irrigation application is complete, open manual drain.

PA
CONTACTS
CATEGORY
EXAMPLES
ACTION
Obvious Threat
Complete structural failure;
1. If there is any potential threat to life or r
Sheriff — 704-638-3000
full or partial loss of a Waste
property, contact 911 or Sheriff's Dept.
Storage Pond wall resulting in a
release of waste
2. Report failure to Division of Water -Quality
DWQ at 704-663-1699,
(DWQ) - provide operation name, location,
or Emergency Management at 704-638-
problem, time of spill, phone number for
0911
return calls & registration/certification
number
Local Contractor — L. P. Barger Grading
3. Make all attempts to stop the discharge and
1075 Goodnight Rd.
contain the waste on the fame
Salisbury, NC 28147
704-633-8693
4. Contact the technical specialist who
Tech. Spec. — 704-637-1604 Ext.3
certified the Waste Storage Pond
Impending Threat
Structural damage from
1. Report failure to DWQ - provide same
DWQ at 704-663-1699
overtopping; leakage or seepage
information as above
or Emergency Management at 704-663-
from base or sidewalls of Waste
1699
Storage Pond; waste discharging
from underground tiles
Tech. Spec. — 704-637-1604 Ext. 3
2. Make all attempts to stop the discharge;
Local Contractor — L. P. Barger Grading
Failure to immediately address
reinforce weak area of structure until a
704-633-8693
these may result in complete.
technical specialist can assess situation
structural failure
Other Discharges
Runoff from spray fields, broken
1. If waste is leaving property use same
Same as far "Impending Threat" category
pipes, leaking pumps, discharges
contacts as for the previous category
from houses and other
maintenance deficiencies
2. Address maintenance deficiencles
Lack of Storage
Anticipated single storin events
1. Contact DWQ for regulatory approval for
DWQ at 704-663-1699
Capacity
exceeding 25 yr.24 hr. frequency
emergency pumping
such as approaching hurricanes;
Or extended rainfall periods
resulting in waste water levels
above the start pump marker.

LS
Waste Storage Overflow
Runoff From Waste.
Leakage From Waste
Leakage From Base or
Application Field
Distribution System
Sidewall of Stora a Pond
* Add soil to berm to increase
* Immediately stop waste
" Stop recycle (flushing
* Dig a small well or ditch to
elevation of dam
application
system) pump
catch all seepage, put in
submersible pump, and pump
* Pump wastes to fields at an
" Create a temporary diversion
* Stop irrigation pump
back into Waste Storage Pond
acceptable rate
or berm to contain the waste
on the field
* Close valves to eliminate
# If holes are caused by
* Stop all additional flow to the
further discharge
burrowing animals, trap or
lagoon (waterers)
* Incorporate waste to reduce
remove animals and fill holes
further runoff
* Separate pipes to create an
and compact with a clay type
* Call a pumping contractor
air gap and stop flow
soil
" Make sure no surface water
* Other Boles may be likewise
is entering lagoon
temporarily plugged with clay
soil

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimze Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production E4 Vegetative or wooded buffers
if Recommended best management practices-
19 Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn + Wet manure -covered 53 Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces Q Promote drying with proper ventilation
9 Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine [9 Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial 69 Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial ir Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or
+ Partial microbial
❑
Bottom or mid -level loading
basin surface
decomposition
❑
Tank covers
• Mixing while filling
❑
Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying
I4
Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
911
Agitate only prior to manure removal
W
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin
• Partial microbial
❑
Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces _
decomposition
❑
Remove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emwvina
Manure, slurry, or + Agitation when spreading
sludge spreader . Volatile gas emissions
outlets
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page_ I
❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges
qF Wash residual manure from spreader after use
If Proven biological additives or oxidants

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure,
* Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces
21
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
I
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks
o Agitation of recycled lagoon
❑
Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling
❑
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain
a Agitation during wastewater
❑
Box covers
collection or junction
conveyance
boxes
Lift stations
* Agitation during sump tank
❑
Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at
* Agitation during wastewater
❑
Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
* Volatile gas emission
❑
Proper lagoon liquid capacity
* Biological mixing
D
Correct lagoon startup procedures
* Agitation
❑
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
❑
Minimum agitation when pumping
❑
Mechanical aeration
❑
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler
* High pressure agitation
l( Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles
o wind drift
@(
Minimum recommended operating procedure
9(
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
❑
Pump from second -stage lagoon
E(
Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Dairy Farm Taste Management Odor Control Cheddist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals o Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water o Improper drainage Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities o Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto o Poorly maintained access Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System --Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Available From :
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU---BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 3

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
T Source _ _ Causer T BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liauid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids M Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
Sr Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharue
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids 9 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Svstems
Feeders • Feed spillage N Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
#"Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 1

Insed Control Cheddist for Animal Operations
Source Cause 9 BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed 19 Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
Mr Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
` solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas . Accumulations of animal Cr Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal
systems
wastes
disturbance by animals is minimal
R( Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
M Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
d Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
51 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

1'
Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
G7 In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

STATE: NC PROJECT: Milder Farm WSP Design 180 Day Storage
BY: ripe Barrier DATE: 1pf25ro1 CHECKED BY: DATE: JOB NO.:
a__,.iECT: Design for 200 Dairy Cows 50% confinement and 50% of Waste Stored as a Slurry
A. DESIGN VOLUMES
1. Normal Runoff for 366 day period.
Use average runoff values In Ag. Waste Management Field Field Manual for Rowan County
Surface U nsurfaced
Normal Runoff Runoff Normal
Month_.. Rainfall 9f ❑enth 4G nenth Fvnnnratinn
:.JAAG
372;,:::�.85
,,
.,
,:
:.0.�9p7
..
3.78
56
2.16
25(.
1.83
yFES
�.
APR
3.38
1.88
25
0.84
3.65
k.
�56
._
JUN
;4//.20{
27
1.1�3�
4.75
�60
{
�2,5�1]
AUG
;3.97
61
2.95
31
1,50
4.36
�.SER.`}'.?
F'.�E�4._�,'.',�
°�'• l}
�",�.'.�"�;w,
�,:�i�2;'i
..r.i,1.Y1,x
s..3:"`�.
OCT
3.�2g1�
62
2.�1y3y
30
1.03{
2.55
DEC
3.56
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.10
Try 6 Months
Oct through Mar :Surface Runoff Depth: 10.45
Drainage Area: 26,136 sgft
Surface Runoff = 10.48 26,136 stift = 22,825 tuft
1 z nt
2. Waste volume
Volume = 200 cows X 7 gaudaylcow X 180 days X 50% confinement
7.48 gal /tuft
Volume = 16,84t3 tuft
3. Wash Water Volume
Parlor and Washroom Water
200 cows X 5 gaudaylcow X 1 BO days 24,064 tuft
4. 25yr - 24hr runoff
C N = 95
Rainfall = 5.5'
Runoff = 4.91"
25yr - 24hr runoff = 4.91" X
12 /ft
26,136 sqft = 10,694 cult
S. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
Miller Farm WSP 6 Months Page 1

STATE: NC PROJECT: Miller Farm WSP Design 180 Day Storage _
BY: Lipe Barrier DATE: 10f25/01 CHECKED BY: DATE: JOB NO.:
b_ EJECT; Design for 200 Dairy Cows 50% confinement and 50% of Waste Stored as a Slurry
21.82 minus 11.34 equals 10,48 inches/1 2 = t1.8 feet per 6 Months
G. 26yr - 24hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 5.6, W t1.5 feet
7. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway stage = 1,2 feet
B. SUMMARY OF DESIGN VOLUMES
1. Surface Runoff for 6 months
22825 cult
2. Waste Volume
16845 cult
3. Wash Water Volume
24064 tuft
4.25 yr - 24 hr Runoff
10694 tuft
TOTAL
74,429 tuft
5. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
0.87 feet
6. 25yr - 24hr rainfall on pond surface
0.50 feet
7. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage
1.20 feet
TOTAL
2.6 feet
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond "AS BUILTS" Volume
130 It X
128 ft top width (to top of dam)
2.6 '
117 ft IF
X
IIZ ft top
5:1
Slope i=23
2.4:1 Slope
Slope :1 93.0 ft
X
95.6 ft mid section .2.1 :1 Slope
�,......
69 ft X '
74 ft bottom width
Depth Tap
Bottom Mtd Area
Volume = 9.8 /6 [( 13705 )
+ ( 5106 ) + 4 ( 8,888)]
Volume = 88,794 tuft Exceeds the ISO days loading
VOLUME NEEDED - 74,429 cuff
Normal Pump out Volume =
22,825 + 16,845 +
78,275 cult , per
= 585,501 gallons per
Maximum Pond Level (Pump -out Elevation)
0.50 + 1,20 +
2.5 below top of dam
l�
24,064 + 0.9 x 130 x 128
180. days = 158,725 cult per year
180 days = 1,187,265 gallons per year
10,694 1 ( 117 x 117 )
Miller Farm WSP 6 Months Page 2

. STATE: NC PROJECT: Miller Farm Waste Storage Pond Emergency Capnc ry
BY: Lipe Barrier DATE: ICV18/01 CHECKED BY: DATE: JOB NO.:
4-.tJECT: Can Waste Storage Pond Will hold total waste with total confinement for 90 days in an emergency - Caeacity is sufficient.
A. DESIGN VOLUMES
1. Normal Runoff for 366 day period.
Use average runoff values In Ag. Waste Management Field Field Manual for Rowan County
Surface Unsurfaced
Normal Runoff Runoff Normal
Month __ ..Rainfall 96 l?erAh 96 r]anth Fvannrntinn
':Ji4N:�,`
� ;3i'72` ::.h,
,�,.,� :..�k }„.
,y� •.�:&�'3
='� : r 2t;I-,:.fit r
'.r;02f%. i
�ti1:1Cx y,
FEB
3.78
566
2.�1
1.83
y� .(
yy
p6
/2�5
,0.97
Ft �r"1 ny.
APR
3.38
56
188
25
0.84
3AS
07 7 a
P
JUN
4.22.0
60
2.51
27
1.13
7
19, Y�lJU4F"�L4
it *%,4:fi1:i%ri,
y
`04.75 11
,�I
AUG
3.97
61
2.95
31
1.50
4.38
}yy
? :\,
4i^i.:jti'r
:=;ci v.w
��,,yy,,'' '� - -
.� ,x-§ '-.
F�,`'f �: •�„
OCT
3.21
fit
2,13
30
1.03
2.56
A�^it
�, _'�.Ti1✓Y "f�"
a�
,'�,iC.t�r !.i
T..
S?4��.�F^�'S�S
♦ �+.�•
r �. I:Vf!3va'�.'}ti
yam:
A;':��
�y
mn���l�;;�;`:.i
♦ �y
'�X..1 �11nx
DEC
3.56
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.10
Try 3 Months
Dec through Fab :Surface Runoff Depth: 6.18
Drainage Area: ' 26,136 sgft
Surface Runoff = 6.18 26,136 sgft = 13,460 cult
12"!ft
2. Waste volume
Volume = 200 cows x 14 gaVday/cow X 90 days X 100% confinement !
7.48 gel lcuft
Volume = 33 690 cuff
3. Wash Water Volume
Parlor and Washroom Water
200 cows x 5 gawdaylaow X 90 days - 12,032 tuft
4. 25yr - 24hr runoff
C N = 95
Rainfall = 5.S'
Runoff = 4,91"
25yr - 24hr runoff = 4.91" X 26,136 sqft 10,694 tuft
12 Pfi
8. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
Miller Farm WSP Emergency Capacity
Page i

0
���� PFIOJECT: Miller Farm W� ..
::STATE: NC
Pond 1=rner Ca
•
- BY: j2!_Bft7J0r: DATE: 10/1Sa01:;; > , CHECKED BY: DATE: .108 NO.:
_ _.,JECT: CaM- 188te­Storage Pond Will hold .kii waste with total confinement far 9d days 1n aR emergency - Capac jri& Wfflcient
11.08 minus 4,03 equals
7,03 inches/l2 IL0 feet per a Months
B. 26yr - 24hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 5.6* b.a feet
7. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway stage =
12 feet
•a SUMMARY OF DESIGN VOLUMES
1. Surface Runoff for 3 months
13460 cult
2. Waste Volume
33690 cult
3l Wash Water volume
12032 cult
A 25 yr - 24 hr Runoff
10694 cuff
TOTAL
t391878 Cub
5. Rainfall minus amporadon on pond surface
0.59 feet
6.25yr - 24hr rainfaN on pond surface
0.50 feet
7. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage
1.20 feet
TOTAL
2.3 feet j
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond "AS BUILTS' Volume
128 h X _ 127 h bop width (to top of dam)
Slope 2.5 :1
9.8
2.41 Mbpe
Sbpe .::; ; ;. 23 :1
93.0
ft X
9&6
ft Q mid section
: s: 21::1 Slope
69
it :::
`r 74_'
h bottom width
Depth
Top
Bottom
Mid Aven
Volume = 9.8
/B [(
13705 }
+
( 5108 } +
4 ( 818" )}
Volume a 1313 7srwi
tuft
Exceeds the
90
days beding
VOLUME NEEDED
69,87e tuft
Normal Pump out Volume
IA460
+
333,690
+
12,032 +
0.6 x 128 x 127.
a
68,735
tuft per
90 days
a 278,75D tuft per year
=
514,138
gallons per
90 days
= 2,085,115 gallons per year
Maximum Pond Level (Pump -ad Elevation)
0.50
+
1.M
+
1Q,eD4 1
( 117 x 117 }
=
2.5
below top of dam
Meter Farm WSP Emergency Capacity Page 2

". OF ANICULW;ZE
Soil Conseris[ion Servica 7/9
7 2�
PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE STORAGE PIT
/2L Id �
6L yt, Date:
County — d��cf/i_ _., . .• •,_ I
Address:
r- LENGTH
1 '
S1 of sLOPEZ=�-To t
43,8 AVE.TOP ELEY.
` 611
AYE. BOTMA ELEY.
LENGTH
(Sce back for voLuw calcu[arions)
Use of facility: r,4
Capacity: 7 Gallons /
Soil Type:
Bench Mark. Description
Bottom
Normal Liquid Level
Storage for normal, Precip.
Maximum Liquid Level
25 yr. Storm storage
Crest ESW
Max . FLOW Depth
Freeboard
Top of Dam
Elev.
Elev.
(+) •
Ft.
Elev.
N
F
Elev.
(+}
Ft.
Elev.

VOLIR,fE OF A TRAPEZOIDAL PIT
One equation for calculating the volume of a trapezoidal oit is:
voluree a ((area of top) + '(area of bottom) r (4 * area
6
Off Midsection)) = �1Ft3
6 -
Another equation for determining the volume of a trapezoidal
excavated pit with constant side slopes is:
V - wdL
+ Zd2(4/� Zd - w - L)
where.
V
= total volume
of the
pit in
ft3.
w
= width of the
pit at
top in
feet.
d
= depth of the
pit at
top in
feet.
L
= length of the
pit at
top in
feet.
Z
= side slope
for 2 to 1
use Z -
2
for 21/2 to
1 use Z = 21/2
NOTE:
Dimensions used must be constructable. Always -check for narrow,
deep pits. -For correct results the following must be true.
w'must be greater than 2Zd
L must be -greater than 2Zd

SCS-EN G- S1•
Row. 5-70
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
WATERSHED AREA MEASEntEMENTS
• r -ACRES PAS'n]RE-ACRES
•a. •TOTAL-ACRES.,POND CLASS WORK•
SKETCH OF ••s . POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS
■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■
■■■....>_�i
■■■■MIN■■
■■■■■■
■■I��l�1■I■■■■■■■R■.r�!!'
■■■■■■■■■1■
■■■■■■■■■EMOM■
■■■■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■■■■■M19-NMI
■■■■■■■■i
■■■■■■�
~�■�1■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I■■■■■
■■■■■
.
BORING NUMBER AND..
Make amd Ust dam -site and spillujau borinirs first. th4"ponded area and b*rmw pit barf4gri.sawmes WIM &wn*vj Mid HfIdL
(Canimued an back whenr nemmro Show water table clemthms on dam-ifte borings.
�o
o�m�m�®��®lmlm�m'i�71
: �®Io►o
®®®ICI■'��■'
I
■!■�■I■I■I■�■�■I■1■E■I
�■f■I■
®m'CAI■1■i■�■■I■■'■�■1■f■I■!■!■I■I■'■I■!■I■1■
®®
I
■'NAERIUM
.)
MEMO
NI►il■I■I■■
OMI■I■
BORINGS. • 'I I■ ""�

TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Use one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
I USDA CLASSIFICATION
GW-Well graded gravels: gravel, sand mix
g- gravel
GP -Poorly graded gravels
z - sand
GM -Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix
vfs-very fine sand
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix
sl - sandy loam
SW- Well graded sands; sand -gravel mix
fsi -fine sandy loam
SP -Poorly graded sands
I - loam
SM-Silty sand
gl-gravelly loam
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures
si-silt
ML-$iits; silty, v. fine sands; sandy or clayey silt
sil -silt loam
CL-Clays of low to medium plasticity
Cl -clay loam
CH -Inorganic clays of high plasticity
sicl-silty clay loam
MH-Elastic silts
i scl-sandy clay loam
OL- Organic silts and silty -clays, low plasticity
sic -silty clay
OH -Organic clays. medium to high plasticity
c -clay
1. Suitable material for embankment in available Yes No (Indicate where lncatea an the iketeh an
�,.... ,tde)
REMARKS:
I Explain hazards requiring special attention in design tSe",aoe, mFtne.. Rwk etc.1
GENERAL REMARKS:
24
25
1261
27
28
29
1 30 31 122J 33 L 34 35
36
3"
38
391
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
48
50
fil
I
l
f

Topographic Map
Miller Dairy
Facility No. 8a14
i r _ti •�.
`� �' �._•, Robert Miller
655 Weaver Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
IZ-
�.-`..-�. � ('��; ;'.•�„;,Ix .. r � � �� `` o � i5€0 , „mob-•.,..�„��„'-��f•
.?`� �'q �. } � , ( �\ � J7r '� °... . is •r 11�� `•
ri.a 'e g 4 mpg soif
f t ; / 'l. •.
t'4 •, 3� �:+r14��'7,• ff'' il• 5., Y, �.t - r ,Y� j
kha �' f�/, € am�l }�tli.� .u_F,w•: �F �'��4.%Z i Y,' .,. . � •7• '
,em 836 I Yu• ��, .r.' `i 'i @N !f yk _ I}0.; /% t Ri ``.` , J— I
i
�4;
"♦ '*;' 6 i a xis eta
(154
I' � ;� �'n •��_ % 7g���� � � �- stir ` .,...., .. � �, t "1. '. �k � t2R 7'! �� � .
t i
3!
Il ., . • f ' �i, 1� 1. 1 Yt t f � i F* f 'R: � '�`;' ' ,
''�i7� • f c �' ! i i� : .� _.� 'c A I 1 � s. � ,r` $ 11�r � ;
1. a' •'f ♦ xwI ti '.j,,14•� • 1 (�If, �f[", 'i �st •�:I �, •'♦
)6e> 152 Eli
. . �� � lira _ .��,,,.,��' , � � ,r � .,� r , � 1 � , • .
'!� � � �.%."�di ;'�� .�� .J.•�µ-_r CJ , ! �x+ "�ffie'� R era,.. w �n� � 50 � � i �� � r �
', `�w:'eh'tSnrrals 1 I• 1 ' • ,S ..- '�'+� r + '
' � '+I'!FO l � r�� , � , ..,.,,� l�' Wa I I'Ank' -� �: '• � ``�, t`� : . ` r --iY .x -<r. � r
4 ,.44 '�::,'a '� `T`•T'!p,l...a•..trx•°, i ¢��, ,.i `,�,. t �l''' �:J"€: i' �. - I�f.�' '�;,
Copyright (C) 1997, ARaptech, Inc.

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
- Ty Y
.0200 Certification Plan
Miller Dairy
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following components:
I. WASTE STORAGE PONDS
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM (IRRIGATION)
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
4. VEGETATED BUFFERS AND FILTER AREAS
5. General
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots and barns and stored in a stockpile in the upper lot for up to
90 days. All contaminated water (wash, flush, parlor and runoff) that drains from waste covered concrete
will be collected in WSP. Concrete curbs, collection boxes and piping divert lot runoff into the waste
storage pond. All waste contained in WSP will be land applied at agronomic rates. The WASTE
STORAGE POND is designed to provide 180 days storage for the solid wastes produced by 200 head,
milking herd confined 50% of the time. See the Waste Utilization Plan for information on irrigation
design and loading rates.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of Animal Waste
Contaminates to surface waters from the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm, as required
under the Non -discharge regulations.
11

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
f 3� AID a„o 4 i
.0200
Certification
Plan
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
aVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store the average lot runoff and wastewater from
the milk barn for a 180-day period. A permanent marker will need to be indicating the level
of storage available prior to infringing on the 25 year, 24 hour storm capacity. The pond should
be emptied before the level reaches Elevation 93.8 or 2.7 ft. below the planned elevation top of
the dam or 1.5 ft. below the spillway elevation. The WASTE STORAGE POND consists of an
earthen dam.
OPERATION
In the WSP will be inspected weekly and current level recorded using installed measuring
marker for reference. As stored slurry nears the maximum operating level plan should be made
for irrigation. It is important to plan ahead to take advantage of good irrigation days.
MAINTENANCE
Vegetation on the dam should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to maintain a
vigorous stand. The dam should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing
operations must take place only when the soil on the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be
mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches at any time. Any evidence of sloughing or
seepage should be reported to the Rowan Soil & Water Conservation District office. Amy trees
or woody growth should be removed by cutting and also removing the stumps and smoothing to
re-establish vegetation. The waste storage pond is fenced out of pasture, but the dam may be
grazed when dry to control vegetation.

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
x
-� 15NEE-
.0200 Certification
Plan
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
The AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM consists of using the existing irrigation
system. The 0.9-inch nozzle is recommended. Follow the tables in the WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN that identify the application rate and amount. System is designed to utilize irrigation as
the slurry delivery source of nutrients to the fields. The system will be used when crop and held
conditions are suitable.
OPERATION
Irrigation operation should be initiated prior to the liquid level reaching the full storage level
marker in the structure. When the liquids level in the WSP reaches the marker, liquids must be
removed by irrigation. The marker elevation is 1.5 feet below the emergency spillway elevation.
Do not irrigate in such a manner as to cause runoff or erosion. Do not irrigate on frozen or
saturated soils.. Irrigate only until soil is near saturation point.
The initial step in each irrigation operation is to properly agitate the waste in the Storage Pond.
Consult owner's manuals for equipment used for recommended operational procedures. Waste
will be sampled and tested for nutrient content each time the pond is emptied.
MAINTENANCE
Fields that receive waste application should have soil tested annually. It is recommended that
waste and soil sample results be used in conjunction with each other.

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
lr� � �
.0200 Certification P1 an
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
Contaminated liquids are collected by a system of curbing, catch basins and piping into the WSP.
OPERATION
Solid waste is scraped and stockpiled in the upper part of the concrete lot. Its drainage is alone
with runoff, and storm water drain to curbs, catch basins and finally into pipe leading to WSP
Guttering is used on the free stall barn to reduce the amount of storm water in the system.
Cattle use the concrete area about 50% of the day, spending the remaining time in the pasture.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the concrete components of the CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or replace as needed.
4. VEGETATED BUFFERS AND FILTER AREAS
OVERVIEW
The VEGETATED BUFFERS serve a two -fold purpose; they filter sediment from exposed
feeding and lounging areas. Their width is based on slope of land and proximity to streams.
These areas can be control grazed or mowed for hay to prevent unwanted growth.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the buffer periodically for sediment accumulation and erosion within the buffer. If
grazing does take place caution should be practiced to prevent overgrazing. Grass should be a
minimum of six (6) inches. These buffers should have at least 80% ground cover. Specified
,width of 100 feet must be maintained. Swells or broad based dips will be constructed and
maintained along fence lines to direct water into filters at frequent intervals. See the plan map
for location of the vegetated buffers.

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
.. -''
Sind i.l
51
.0200 Certification Plan
5. GENERAL COMMENTS
AGREED TO ITEMS
By signing the Waste Utilization Plan the landowner agrees to apply the collected waste
according to the terms of this agreement. Waste samples will be collected, and test result used
for record keeping and management of the farms cropland.
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides so that desirable vegetation is not
adversely affected. It is a violation of law to use any pesticide in a manner not permitted by its
labeling.
Notify the Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District at 704-637-1604, Ext 3 if repairs or
major modifications are required for any of the components of this Waste Management System.
4

��A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Robert L. Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury, NC 28147
Dear Robert L. Miller:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
July 24, 2009
I
Freeman
JUL 2-7 =
Subject: Additional Information Request
Application No. AWC800014
Miller Farm .
Rowan County
The Animal Feeding Operation Unit of Division of Water Quality's Aquifer Protection Section has
completed a preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is
required before we may continue our review. Please address the following items within 30 (thirty) days
of receipt of this letter:
1. Missin2 Waste Utilization Plan:
You were requested submit two copies of your facility's waste utilization plan (WUP or, nutrient
management plan, NMP). Our records show you only submitted one sheet from the NMP; state law
requires that the NMP be submitted with any permit application. Please submit missing copies of
your current WUP or NMP to my attention at the address given on at the bottom of the first page of
this letter.
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and
regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the
responsibility of the applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items shall
result in future requests for additional information.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised
and/or additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated, with two (2) copies submitted to my
attention at the address below. Please note that failure to provide this additional information on or before
the above requested date may result in your application being returned as incomplete.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may.
result in a civil penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would
constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to
$25,000 per day.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwateMualitv.nre Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50°% Recycled110°% Post Consumer Paper
�oe Caro Ina
turaly
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer service: [phone]

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
wr Cl3:J 1 ]► j Vv
Sincerely,
Christine D. Blanton
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc:. Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Files- AWC800014

WDlvisiOn of Water Quality
Factlity Number ®-� Q Division of.Soil and Water Conservationt
. ;' .:✓ r? _ a.'. F _. a Q,Other,"Agency,
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 49 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
��in�i.unmi i i w n in�irwuirr
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 10 LJU Departure Time: 62.`.% ounty: kZ5)X04" Region: ARy
Farm Name: I ll F Owner Email:
Owner Name: .a�'�'�'�' L _ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:JY� *" I
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator: Q
Certification Number: p7 2 3�
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Y3. Design',,:CnrrenE"' Design ' Curren
Garin" C'snapi Pnn Wet POIEit CaV n -ity Po Cattle
Wean to Finish
'z. Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
r3' P p•
La er
Non -La er
Doriun Current
N
Design Current
Capacity ' Pop.
Dai Cow
DairyCalf
Da i Heifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Dischar es and Stream Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes f*ZfNo NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [] Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than. from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [] Yes�ia ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No St ❑ NE
K7 Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .
Spillway?. _
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ YeS�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes )§No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes , LEgVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Ado ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes- 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes A1- o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy
Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN. ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ YesNA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for.land application?
❑ Yes -No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 'tSNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes o NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail.W to have all components of the CAMP readily available? If yes, check ❑Yes io Q NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
[�-WWUP Check fists e ' ps ease greements ❑Other:
21. D record keeping need improvement? If yes, check t ppropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ Z2r
NE
ante Application eekly eeboard aste Analysis Soil sis ast Code
Rainfall tacking op Yield 0 Minute Inspections E3monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections fudge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ -Yes ❑ No `�NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 214122011 Continued

acifl Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [] Nol�c NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fait to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) ce 'fication? Yes No TA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dgad_auiwwas.�vith 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher anal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-applica ions)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34: Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA [] NE
❑ Yes V ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes )!ZM [] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA' ❑ NE
❑ Yes�NA
NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional. recommendations or any other coinments.
Use drawings of facii 6 to better explain situations (use additional'pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412011

E•. F.;.. •,•A' ., ,.-Dlvesion of;Water Qpahty _4 c r .r'v �r.' t� f
..d'��a,
"Facility Nuumber '� " .L Q`Dtvision of Soil and Water Conservation - r
,A
41
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z d Arrival Time: 01 t Departure Time: b County: �J� Region:
Farm Name:�� Owner Email:
Owner Name: _ a k�"'L r V t / Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: _ �J1�= �- -� Vvt Q Certification Number: g� 2
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
--Swine
aa;
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
-
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
z=.i
JFarrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Latitude:
Longitude:
resign `Current {,, 1, Design" Current= r " x Desigh Current
1pacity Pop Wet Poultry Capacity Pop Cattle Capacity Pop`
La er
Non -La er
"Design` Current1
DryPoaltry.Caparity� 'Pap
Gilts
Non-L
Boars
Pullets
Turke
Turkel
1 10ther
ai Cow
—bairy
Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
{
bq`
Discharges and Stream -Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
-gQo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at, ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
ElNo
S A
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[] Yes
❑ No �NA
[] NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past,discharge from any part of the operation? -
❑ Yes
bs<.O
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? ,
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: -I I Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes ❑ A
❑ NE
A a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes [] No yk--RA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[] Ye�No 0 NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes,
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
DNA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ YeTo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[] Yest�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window EvidenZo
Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �% co-Q. r 1 P_� i_��
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
Nd.-V/LS
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes IlErtio
❑ Yes �
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes :�Oo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes t!];�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
esign . aps a ents ❑ Other:
2�es record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Ye o ❑ NA NE
Z
Application �eekly Freeboard �ste Analysis Soil Analysis aste rans ers eather Code
ll tocking rop Yield Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yea�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

(itacility Number: - Date of Inspection:
-- 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permicct,,?�A!P�Yes
es o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facili out of com liance with ermit conditions related to slud e? If es che�No A NE
tY P P g Y �� ❑
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No � ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher t ani normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Ye&.-A�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of eigUr 12nc s' as required by the
❑ Yes 2 io
❑ NA- ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field [].Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the pen -nit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes �do
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Type of Visit *Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: FOE.q5 F, .Departure Time: c�-A:OD County: Region:
Farm Name: �V V ` _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: ' Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: _ Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: o ` ❑ " Longitude: = o
Swine
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other.
❑ Other
Design Current
Capacity Population
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
Non-L
Pullets
Poults
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design. Current
Cattle Capacity Population
015airy
Cowes
t:tDairy
Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Da Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocket
El
-Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes)!g:�'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
El NE
El Yes [I No
[I NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A
❑ NE
,
[I Yeso - ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes El NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

!*
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4.. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): ::200
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate puhlie hea
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes 21�Z ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
Structure 5 ructure 6
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes . o ❑ NA ❑ NE
►tify DWQ
NA [3 NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? �, e No ElNA
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o I--]NA
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA
maintenance/improvement?
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑JPAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)�'>'`
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 4q�__'Or❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 31lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination', El YesTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes yy ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Co n:0'7(r &Q0d� u6WonW)-'�Xsplain any.XE answersjand/or ny.recg €n�mend us ar any ntlierWcamtnents
�Uae dra�gs'of facility ta9lretker e�ip�in�situatians�{�igea�irttonailpagesas necessary). ;. � s
aot
b
c5�-/off i
Reviewer/Inspector Nance `.t,� `� �,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
I2128104 Continued

P
(f Facility Number: —
Required Records & Documents
Date of Inspection
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. WUP
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes NA El NE
21. Does re rd keeping need improve ? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Y NA ❑ NE
Waste Application ee y Freeboard aste Analysis oil Analysi Waste Transfer Annual Certification
ainfall Stockin Crop Yie 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections XfWeather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fai l to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ���O
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than nonnal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
ElYes No�`�TA ❑ NE
ElYes NA El NE
ElYes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes .<a ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes .'Jjd�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes of ❑ NA
❑ NE
t .i - �s -•..rl ra..
_ b P'
Additional Commeuts'and/or Drawings„ s� : `. _.'>+�...,,..51
r�
12128104

b,Division of Water;Quality,Co
'aCiltty,Number,
-,Q Dlvtsion�of Soli,and Water nservation
„.
Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit IS Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral Q Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2°}%1{ I Arrival Time: DepartureTime: County: �0�� Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:D �--'� ! V Phone: _ 1
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: r�
Certified Operator: RPL_ ` '" ,�
) �� _
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number.
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0 =1 = Longitude: = o = ` 0 «
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ TurkeX Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity PApjaHon
S�DairvCow
2�'b
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated'volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes_,it ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ' ❑ No MIR ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No \ ❑ NE
❑ Yes — No ❑,NA ❑ NE'
❑ YeNA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
;4. is sto&caitructural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structur 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structu
Identifier:
Spillway?: <
Designed Freeboard (in):
— K
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of tV —structures obser,
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yesq ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes
El NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes ,'�-Ko ❑ NA FINE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? "Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improve nt? —2<0,
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yo ❑ NA ❑ NE
ElExcessive Ponding [IHydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ElHeavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area { ,�
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soiltype(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Y
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or.operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑
Yes ',I�To
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
+F < c sx ,..Z ,,€s='-. "if3+� 1VW'
UsOdrawings of fatality Wbettet explain situations (use additional pages as" necessary)
p r ©� ��- L_ X � G� z ��. ��
�`�
Reviewer/Inspector Name Yr� , f
,.:5...� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continuer)

ti.
r
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ><❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Ye ❑ NA ,'❑ NE
the appropirate box. ec is s s ❑ Other
r.
21. Does r ord keeping need impr vement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes o NA El NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard .Waste Analysis oil Analysis a aste Transfers Annual Certification
ainfall tocking rop Yield20 Minute Inspections .21VOnthly and I' am Inspections ❑ &aather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No JjqA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes *0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of de within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher an non-nal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ) 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
A1.dditional Comme' is and/or Drawings
yM,
r e r a fur
12128104

Facility Number:
PLAN OF ACTION,(PoA) FORM for HIGH WASTE LEVELS
IN STRUCTURES AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
County:
Facility Name:
Certified Operator Name: Operator #:
Date that High Waste Level Was Initially Reported to DWQ:
DWQ Contact Name:
Current Situation
Z. List the current waste level(s) as measured from the waste level in the lagoon/storage pond to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for structures without spillways; and from the waste level in the
structure to the bottom of the spillway for structures with spillways. Also list the quantity of waste
above the maximum liquid mark (also called "start pump").
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure Name/ID:
Spillway (yes or no):
Waste Level (inches).
Above Maximum Mark (inches):
Dam is Slumping or Seeping (yes or no):
Mitigating Factors
2. Brief summary (incl. date, type, and amount) of precipitation events contributing to high waste level:
3. Date of most recent waste application event:
4. Per the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), how is animal waste land -applied at
your facility (e.g. solid spreader, irrigation, honey wagon, slurry truck)?
Evaluation of Waste Management System
S. If applicable, has the cattle lot and barns been inspected for leaking drinkers? Have repairs been
made?
6. If applicable, is there enough guttering on the barns to exclude fresh water from the waste
structure? If not, when is installation or repairs to be made?
Piah %Afncfo I c.t DnA Cnrm_AA .7f11R

7. if applicable, is the diversion ditch around the waste structure functioning properly and excluding all
fresh water from the structure?
8. Describe all methods employed to contain the waste or to exclude it from surface waters (e.g. berm,
ditch, retention hole, alternate application method, removal of cattle to pasture):
Proposed Strategy
Describe moisture conditions in the field (e.g. standing -water, application equipment mars down in
field, "trafficability" across the soil, soils able to absorb application without runoff, application fields
frozen and/or snow covered):
10. Given optimum soil and weather conditions, what is the earliest possible date that land application
could commence?
11. Do you have a waste analysis obtained within 60 days of application?
12. Proposed receiving crop(s), acreage, and application window(s):
13. Is waste to be pumped and hauled to an off -site location? If so, list the volume and PAN content of
the waste to be hauled as well as the proposed site(s) with their related facility number, number of
acres, receiving crop information, etc. Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water
Quality prior to transfer of waste to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste plan.
I hereby certify that i have reviewed the information listed above, and to the best of my knowledge
and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
H IGh NAI;;SiP I Pval PnA Form-Mar2010

s -^' r -;{- .� :' ...z s i .: yF 55 S,,w :<.' r' #. { -•.; - A r _ -, � - P-„ "°� �' ° t kr k '
- �"i® Division of Water Qualitys' . XAKi�zrr�'I Y
.=s.. - i��.. i..-, r:.: .. y • - aof x "'� uF..t�k '^" lr•*Y--+�.� __
Facility Number; I °°'� Division%f Soil and Water Conservation'�'� �* f
ff
�therAgency
Type of Visit *Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: tO Arrival Time: Departure Time: bE:%' County: �"' " ' �. Region:
Farm Name: " " 1 t i 1�..., Owner Email:
Owner Name:-R�,E­ Ac--` l'y L _ — Phone:., _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: �"' 0
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: _ do
Operator Certification Number:1 V7
Back-up Certification Number:~�
❑ o ` { I b = o =, i t
Latitude: Longitude:
Design • Cur`rent Design g Current
awme r . capacity ropuiatton
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other _.
❑ Other
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
,--,.Dry Poultry
Pullets
Poults
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Cattle
Design, Current
Capacity,`,P ri
w �'32
Dairy Co
❑
DairyCalf
❑
DairyHeifej
❑
D Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NoA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �A
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �A
❑ NE
❑ Yeso A
El NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
5tructur.e l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes -�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No``❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier!
Spillway?: `�—
Designed Freeboard (in): H
Observed Freeboard (in): 7
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
NA
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed'and/or managed ❑ Yes o ❑ ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environme tat, threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes kro ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Applicatioln Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) i �N I k ,1 ct" � (�bl
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yesjikio
El NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
��
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,
El Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
to
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Da 2
l°�✓1 `�3 k\Li
Reviewer/Inspector Name yr .n#isjk Phone:
�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

i
l racility Number: - Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes k_0[:1 NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
esign aps er
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes —No ❑ NA ❑ NE
'PAV"a'ste Application Weekly Freeboard 0-0aste Analysis oil Analysis D-W—aste Transfers nnual Certification
_01-ainfall c ing rop Yield 20 Minute Inspections onthly and 1" Rain Inspections `Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ YeLl I* ElNA ElNE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No IkNA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �❑ No _'&�NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes -�Ego ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No J�'NA ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o `❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of. PL�n1�-within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes"- o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by QD
ElNo El NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard roblems, r application
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes \ El NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes *o ❑ NA ❑ NE
,9^� W.,. 'ii r 2 rt {7 0..-r. �'.:,�. 31',i ov c-rM n J �f ;ti.ti,. /s ;girl, gy '.
AdditJonal Comments $ndlor Drawlrigfi" ASKS �'l r a
12128104

AliAn1W
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director V 2 tary
October 1, 2009 OCT 1 4 2009
Robert L Miller
Miller Farm NC DFNR rb1F�p
3510 Miller Rd DWQ - A utf Protection
Salisbury, NC 28147
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800014
Miller Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
Dear Robert L Miller:
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Robert L Miller, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Miller Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no greater than
the following annual averages:
Dairy Calf- Dry Cow: Beef Brood Cow:
Dairy Heifer: Beef Stocker Calf: Other:
Milk Cow: 200 Beef Feeder:
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWC800014 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged_with_this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] ti FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet. www ncwaterquality.org
011C
North Cara t i iia
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be fled at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition I1.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
www.erh.noaa.gov/er/gW/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations 'Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWC800014)
AFO Notebooks

t
4
Division of Water Quality
j-� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: $00014 ,_ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC 00014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance In i n Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 02/27/2009 Entry Time:04:00 PM Exit Time: 05:30 PM _ Incident ##:
Farm Name: Miller Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Robert L Miller
Phone: 7 4 7- 7
Mailing Address: M1.Q Miller Rd „ _ Salisbury NC 28147___
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant
Location of Farm:
❑ Not Compliant tntegrator:
Latitude: 25°36 35" __ Longitude: ° • '
Located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Weaver Rd. (SR 1535) and Miller Rd (SR 1509).General location: southeast of
Millbridge.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection $ Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other lssues
Certified Operator: Robert Luther Miller Operator Certification Number: 987235
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date: r�
Secondary Inspector(s):
'Inspection Summary:
10/06/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 0,48 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/02/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.88 Lbs11000 Gallons
10/07/08 > Soil Analysis
C.
Page: 1

0
Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller
Inspection Date: 02127/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 800014 1
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Milk Cow 200 97
Tuiai Dusigi-, Capacity: GVv
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�aste Pond TPOND-1 30.00 39.00
Page: 2

s4
Permit: AWCB00014 Owner- Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 02/27/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ C3 n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n■n❑
n■n❑
Yes No NA NE
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
❑
D
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
[1
n
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
In
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

i
Permit: AWC800014 Owner- Facility: Robert L Miller
FacilityNumber: 800014
Inspection Date: 02/27/2009 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
Q
Total P205?
I_f
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
F1
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Soybeans
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Sail Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0 ■ 0
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■ n n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 0 ■ n n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0 ■ n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■ n Cl
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D ■ n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? L�
Page: 4

h
Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller
Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 02/27/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps?
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? rl ■ ❑ Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application? n
120 Minute inspections? n
Weather code? n
Weekly Freeboard? n
Transfers?
Rainfall? n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? n
Waste Analysis? n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
o
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? n n ■ In
PYLL__ I_ . __ -
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? Q ■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ n ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number: 600014
Inspection Date: 02/27/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? f=I ■ 0 0
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ 0
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 800014 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance ln§pection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 09/1 !9� 2_ 08, Entry Time:01:30 PM Exit Time: 03:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Miller Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Robert L Miller _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 351Q Miller Rd Salisbury NC 28147 _
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35'36'35" 1 Longitude: 80°36' 0"
Located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Weaver Rd. (SR 1535) and Miller Rd (SR 1509).General location: southeast of
Millbridge.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert Luther Miller Operator Certification Number: 987235
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: [phone]
_AN;�(5� Ext.21 2
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
04/02/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.88 Lbs/1000 Gallons
08/27/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.64 Lbs11000 Gallons
03/01/07 > Soil Analysis
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shall
be mowed regularly.
C.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number: 800014 �
Inspection Date: 09/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 200 90
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
t
aste Pond PONDS 30.00 33.00
Page: 2

t
f
Permit: AVVC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller
Facility Number :
800014
Inspection Date: 09/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
■
n n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
fl
Application Field
❑
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■ n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
Q
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
n
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (blot applicable to roofed pits,
rl
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800014 Owner • Facility: Robert l Miller Facility Number : 800014
Inspection Date: 09/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? n
Total P205? n
Failure to incorporate manure/siudge into bare soil? n
Outside of acceptable crop window? n
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? n
Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage)
C T 2 Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
rop ype
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Soybeans
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
CI
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P? n
Page: 4

1 '
Permit: AVVC800014
Inspection Date: 09/19/2008
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
Owner - Facility: Robert L Willer
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 800014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes
No
NA
NE
n
JV
n
n
n
n■nn
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfail & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■ n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES onlyp
n
n ■ n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■ n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n ® n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
®n n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n ■ n
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
non
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■ n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller
Inspection Date: 09119l2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
✓ � ,�• Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 800014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n■nn
0 m 0 D
n■nn
Page: 6

-PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
r ;
Facility Number: go - / County: Row,00-
Facility Name:mil
y- F0 CyrpS - --
Certified Operator Name: i ol1i' Operator
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured Afrom'the current liquid' level in thelagoon' to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways. .
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Name/Identifier (iD ro
Spillway (Yes or No):+�s!'
Level (inches):
2, Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm'elevations for one or more structures. A 30=day
Plan of Action is attached. -Agronomic balance is within acceptable,range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off,site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: Alb more raiA
I hereby certify that 1 have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ahPlify, n is accurate and correct.
&bee4. 1, (Oij
Fa 'lilyOwprint)
Facility Owner/Manager,(signature)
PoA Cover Pa9e 2121/00
one:

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1, Structure Name/Identifier (ID): r
2. Current liquid volume in structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker ®inches
b. designed structural freeboard zone inches
(Normally 12 inches or greater)
c. line b - line a (inches within structural freeboard) _ --�Qinches
d, top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) ®ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 /7() 1 "gallons
. i
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 90 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design ,� 0 ft3
h. current herd # certified herd # .20
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j, excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k: (lines h+ i+ j) x 7.48 x 5 dayslline f
4. Total volume of waste to be land applied during 5 day draw down
I. total volume to be land applied line e + line k =
1!5/ 4V.:5 ft3
I Z 0301 ft3
®ft3
3$ gallons
L.Z&qygallons
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS. (Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (5 Day) 2/21/00

' II. TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
' FOR ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
I.7 - 61 41
1. structure 1D: "dra
line I = allons
2. structure ID:
line I = gallons
3. structure ID:
line I = gallons
4. structure ID:
line I = gallons
5. structure ID:
line I = gallons
6. structure ID:
line I = gallons
n. lines I + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 + 6 =
/7sib gallons
o. line n 127154 =
61 y-7 acre -inches
III. TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE WASTE DURING 5 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD''2
'While this section deals with hydraulic loading capacities, applications cannot exceed
agronomic rate for receiving crop according to its certified waste plan.
2Fields with no remaining PAN balance, no receiving crop, and/or completely saturated are
not considered available to receive waste.
NN
W
fu.
WObfa'nra'�'
remaining
,balance
��Wl
maximum
x, total acres available during 5 day draw down (sum of column t) = 19••%3 acres
IV, FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL HYDRAULIC LOAD TO BE LAND APPLIED PER ACRE
PcA (5 Day) 2/21100

Y. line o = inches per acre to be applied within 5 days
line x
If unable to land apply hydraulic load listed in line y, list course of action here including pump
and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump R haul and herd reduction options,
recalculate new hydraulic load based on new Information.
Plan to land apply hydraulic load:
1. Describe moisture conditions of fields? (e.g. Is there water standing in field; does irrigation
equipment mar down in field: "trafficability" across soils: will soils absorb application without runoff, etc
�A\e i ds ore �7bo*,-n j u *�v o ., rn o . ran a #'
o r 34,011 wole.o-
2. Date and amount of last rainfall event?TI Zw 0 l d + 0� t it7Tmf
DATE: 24P " -Alt AMOUNT:1%27 • inches
3. Dates of last waste a lication event Rer field: 2 IR 7
Nd was+e &# plc t@t4„,, 46 -'htce ' P,,•e ids
}
. x
4. Given optimum soil and weather conditions, is irrigation equipment capable of applying the volume in
line "n" at appropriate seasonal i.e. winter application rates Within b days-?
w�1t �1n,sh �n q/�jd�
5. Irrigation schedule for next 5 days - include daily schedule: proposed application rates and amounts
per irrigation event; changes made in gun sizes, nozzles, "o" rings, operating time, travel speed, etc. to
meet proposed changes in application rates and amounts: and any other information for consideration.
/YO C tiC't'j4'L r., lA �tip1� t ail o� r0Ae s o ter `fiat. : wi l
V
�,' �
�W . r/, m �xx rofc Q �
4() avoid s-f .ac w 4�ey d b,*C t
341 rnO-Y. "k e 7repfItY Sid
TA is W t I i J.C> rimt U n &r �` -. bwW 4 4,...1 W t it rv%00 a r) O+ker
gPPhcol" on ruv� WaIli,
PoA (5 Day) 2/21/00

t Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: a00014 _ Facility Status: &live Permit: AWC800014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Co nnUance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: Qa/29/2007 Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time: ¢2QQ PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Miller Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Robert L Miller
Mailing Address: 3510 Miller Rd __ _ „ Salisbury NC 28147
Physical Address:
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Phone: [phone]
Latitude:35°36'30" Longitude:80°36'30"
Located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Weaver Rd. (SR 1535) and Miller Rd (SR 1509).General location: southeast of
Miilbridge.
Question Areas.
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert Luther Miller Operator Certification Number: 22427
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealte Phone: ,,`.��tt�,,a
Inspector Signature: Date: Ay` 21��%
Secondary Inspectar(s):
Inspection Summary:
02/19/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.92 Lbs11000 Gallons
11/30/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.50 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/01/07 > Soil Analysis
G
Page: 1

Permit: AVVC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 03/29/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
—"Cattle - Milk Cow 200 107
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
rite Pond PCND1 . 30.00 39.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert 1- Miller Facility Number : 800014
Inspection Date: 03/29/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. is any discharge observed from any past of the operation?
n
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
o
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8 Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
0
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
00
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller
Inspection Date: 03/29/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 800014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
n
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Soybeans
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Q ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ o o
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q ■ n ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fait to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ Q ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Q ■ n Q
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 4
4

i Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert I- Miller Facility Number : 800014
Inspection Date: 03/29/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checktists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? Cl ■ 0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
In
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
❑
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility rail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
Is
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an activeiy certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
❑
Y..
IJn
IJA
Wr
28. Were any additional probtems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those ❑ ■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ (_1 n
QuaRy representative immediateiy.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number : 800014
Inspection Date: 03/2912007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ 0 0
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? n ■ n 0
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n■nn
Page: 6

4n
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection , _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: B=an Region: W"resyille
Date of Visit: 08124/2006 Entry Tlme:03:30 PM Exit Time: 0&00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Miller Farm Owner Emall:
Owner: Robert L Mailer Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3510 Miller Rd _ Salisbury NC 28147
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Fans: Latitude: 35°36'30" ___ _ Longitude: 80°36'30"
Located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Weaver Rd. (SR 1535) and Miller Rd (SR 1509).General location. southeast of
Millbridge.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents © Other issues
Certified Operator: Robert Luther Miller Operator Certification Number: 987235
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Robert L. Miller Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: C7a-D�3S'.ZtL�2
Inspector Signature: Date: 99� 141"IV(>
Secondary Inspectors(
Inspection Summary:
07/06/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 12.2 Lbs11000 Gallons
02/23/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.2 Lbs11000 Gallons
02/03/06 > Soil Analysis
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shall
be mowed regularly.
24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in September, 2006.
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 08/24/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 200 95
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Pond I POND1 I 1 1 30.001 32.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number: 800014
Inspection date: 08/2412006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
1100
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
s
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of,the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are•there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller Facility Number : 800014
Inspection Date: 08/24/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
WasteApplication Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Cover
Crop Type 4
Soybeans
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
E ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller
Facittty Number: 800014
Inspection Date: 08/24/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
0
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
0
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■ ❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
■
❑
^.L.__
Yon Ian
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? - ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

r
Permit: AWC800014 Owner - Facility: Robert L Miller
Inspection Date: 08/24/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
O#her Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 800014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

OF W A TF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
C� Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
--i Division of Water Quality
O 'C
October 1, 2004
Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury NC 28147R E C;
"Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800014
OCT 1 2004 Miller Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
HC OgpT OF FW.F.90NMENT Storage and Application System
ANO NATURAL RESOURCES Rowan County
190ORESVILLE RES OML OFFICE
Dear Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 24, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Irene H,
Mike, Robert Miller, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage
and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. - The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC800014 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Miller Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this -permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section - Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
One
NorthCarolina
,Xatura,lly

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
v
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC800014
APS Central Files

Type of Visit .Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral ()Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
too
Date of Visit: �3` ' Arrival Time: : O O Departure Time: _J County: w Region:
Farm Name: !I� F/dl- _1_ _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: fZA4 G _ 11'MG) K1C �rPhone:
Mailing Address: �5 �� /1'l�Il� P�} 56 i,* S &,ty _- - /11 c Lq
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Q4��sc� i_-1 } II _ Title: r�"'+'� /OZ �- Phone No:
Onsite Representative: !!
Certified Operator: fz,4,1* i1r`1-cr
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
,.Other
❑ Other
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: 47 B 73 r S_
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0 = { = N Longitude: = ° ❑ ` =
11
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer E
__ ^� �� ❑ Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
ER
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
EFDry
Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocket
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes & No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
91 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 5-o Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists El Design El maps [I Other
® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste 'Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
KI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
91 NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E No
' ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[--]No
,S NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes F No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Ailditionaf`Comments and/or Drawings:...'..;k% x
lo44� c1
76,.E Y-,op R'eord5 JAL av,,i-d
f7r'^ & R'&J r 'M-01 -o -p IM..+
12128104

Facility Number: -v- a — sf Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: W+�+
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): * O
Observed Freeboard (in): -5 6
❑ Yes 9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
29 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
8 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
93 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
V9 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of
Area
12. Crop type(s) CarW o s p9rrle , (rKQ
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination`
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
E9 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (rer to��ques�ionf#)� Explai�n�an�y�'�YESanswers,an�lkor�any�recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawinygst�o/fgfaciltty�to�better explatp°situations}(use�a"dditronaltpages as necessary : y
/
S1O
0.7?
� 73 y, y
'"? Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector NameWIN
Reviewer/inspector Signature: �,L,%/ Date: 0 5
12128/04 Continued

Type of Visit X Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit J)6 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date or visit: Sr-li},oY Time:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted ,3 CCe/rdfied © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operat or Above Threshold:
FarmName:..I.!!1....................................................................................... County:..........................................................
OwnerName: ... t![.fll.P�r..IftZleg.............................................................................. Phone No: ... »...................................................... ............................
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: ..........ov
[( Tr .. Title: Phone No:
l� �� t
Onsite Representative:..........40! ........... ..., .. Integrator:
...... ..... ...................................................................................
!r tt
CertifiedOperator : ................................................... .................... ......................................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ]9 Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 4 66 Longitude • ' 44
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 91 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 1P No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:........... ................................... .................................... ................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): SY r
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: fo — 141 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes Fj No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste AnDlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc Y`
12. Crop type So WIL&�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes]
No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Odor Issues
17.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
❑ Yes
E] No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
91 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
ink.:- �:'!""l^t't:'- .[ vn't�.:.:f - "?,:f.- - "'1a�.: 1+`^+'"S4N`,.. - ,:n.'.n�=•'lSr,;s".':""N:r`as�w'i`r �tr .�,.'M7.r.� '. ��.G„ec:,,.,,,...E,3�»'� i' -r !
Comments (refec,to qui!Wd i #) "EftpliVa any YFS-aoswers and/or any recommendations or any ther&c mmentS:ur l " h i YY" ,
H L Ir�l !w a.. t ''"''I! K ,#. ,-',. ,N'8t�.4::t �,_kk :sit3h ��-'f ,
Use drawings off #'acility4tobetter,ezplaui sttuaaons: {use'adldiaonal pages ss necessary): ❑Field COPY ❑Final Notes
} i hr{ 1 r t f,'.a V �"f
i "� y r
.r,,.�.t h�&
A,
T
r sr� 3 - F�m!$f ii t'1 ReVlewerAISpectOr Name
ierClnpector
r,!
em
�-
d
Signature: Date:
12112103 Continued

I.Facflity Number: p — Date of Inspection 4
Required Records & Document.~
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
3I. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ;91 No
❑ Yes & No
❑ Yes 1�1 No
❑ Yes Ej No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
s visit.
12112103

OF W A 7 F9 Michael F. Fasicy, Goe-1
pG William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
q North Carolina Department of Environment and Naturai Resources -
Alan W. laimek, P. E., Director
-[ Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
September 15, 2003
Robert Miller
3510 Miller Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
Subject: Miller Dairy; Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage #: 800014
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Miller
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on September 11, 2003.
Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be in compliance with the facility's certified farm plan.
Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Attachments
cc: File
7
KCDehR
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]

tType of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
`E Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow vp O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
FacUity Number 80 14 Date of Visit: 0911]f2iltl3 Time: I =
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permined ■ Certified ❑ Condhionaily Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: - _ _ _ _ — _
Farm Name: M1WFUM....................................................... County: Runan
ORaer Name: imaneJLM& Buis 0— 11'Ift----------------- Phone No:
Mailing Address: J ,W. Milk t:Rd---- -._________.___._ Sali�+hrrn NC
Facility Contact: ------------------------------------------ Title: .................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: R41UW.M9.1.FL _.— — — — — — — — — — — — — — - Integrator. __--__---------._—..—__--.__
Certified Operator: Rtt =dJ Mailer ____ Operator Certification Number: 22J22
Location of Farm:
Located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Weaver Rd. (SR 1535) and Miller Rd (SR 1509).
General location: southeast of Millbridge,
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • ®` �" Longitude 80 30 M
Design Current
Shine Canacih• Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Fimsh
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Colts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca achy Pa ulation Cattle Ca acih- Population
Ig Laver ®Dain 200 I l o
Non -Laver Non-Dain
Other
Total Design Capacity 240
Total SSLW 280,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 0 Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made'
b. If discharge is obsen-ed- did it reach Water of the State' (If ves. notifi- DWQ )
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in galimin''
d. Does discharge bypass a lagcxin system' (If ves_ notify DWQ )
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [_-]No
❑ Yes IR No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes R No
M"aste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® SpillAvin ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure ? Strucnre ; Stnicture 4 Stnucture 5 Structure C
Identifier: ..................... .................
Freeboard (inches): 4—

v✓r ,.� V1
6
Facility Number: 8U — Ia
Date of Inspection 09li112003
5 Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
c, annnuea
❑ Yes ® N«
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Sorghum
13. Do the receivhig crops differ i%ith those designated in the Certified Animal Vltaste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
IS. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes, -0-No-
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0 No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20, is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
Z No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
fNo violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You n ill recen•e no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #j:r Explain'ans YES answers andlor anti recommendations or anti otter comments. "
Use iirawings-of facdih to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
RECORDS APPEARED TO BE COMPLETE.
NO PROBLEMS WERE OBSERVED AT THE FACILITY.
Reviewerllnspector Name Alan 3ohson
0....:....•�.. �i..........a..� �:...... �.. �... Cr'Z l�4-'� �fL✓ ice n..a... C

O� W A rF Michael F. Easley, Governor
RQ William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j r Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller
Miller Farm-
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800014
Miller Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
Dear Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle -Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 24, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Irene H,
Mike, Robert Miller, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage
and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC800014 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not Iimited to, the management
_-of animal waste from the Miller Farm, located in Rowan County, with. an.animal_capacity_of_.no.greater
than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to Iand as specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow,or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Pernuttee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
AMA
NR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, INC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpl/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish .to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of. the
General Permit; an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact I R 7oshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District --
Permit File AWC800014
NDPU Files
- - Al C Or -PT. aT IC!' O'tii NSYT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
OOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
MAY 1 9 2003
WATER QUALITY SECTION

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Miller Farm
Robert Miller
65.5 Weaver Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
704-857-3031
02-12-2003
This plan has been developed by:
C. Lipe Barrier, Jr., Environmental Spec. 11
DSWC
444 Bristol Dr.
Statesville, NC 28677-2942
704-873-6761 Ert. 3 ,
Developer Signature
- Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
�z An
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved B •
PP Y•
Tech ical Specialist Signature Date
.......... .... ...... ..- ------ ...........
124258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-12- 003 Cover Page 1

r
r%.. .. �;;;z
Tract and Field Listing
Miller Farm
Irene H., Robert and Mike Miller
Field Number Total Acres Broadcast Acres Irrip-ated Acres Land Use
Tract 19016
1
36
11.4
Cropland
IA
6.3
6.3 Cropland
113
6.2
6.2 Cropland
1C
6.2
6.2 Cropland
1 D
5.9
5.9 Cropland
2e
33.0
3 3. 0
Cropland
20
33.0
33.0
Cropland
1 g
8.4
8.4
Hayland
3
3.2
3.2
Hayland
4
3.2
3.2
Hayland
5
17.1
17.1
Cropland
6
8.1
8.1
Cropland
7
12.8
12.8
Hayland
8
3.3
3.3
Cropland
Tract 19022
1 4.5
4.5
Pasture
2 1 A
1.4
Pasture
3 4.4
4.4
Pasture
4 3.0
3.0
Pasture
5 8.1
8.1
Pasture
6 6.2
6.2
Pasture

j T' �,'
\ r tee"t♦4N
;r`fh fj': ��- •`:-Hr� N�ij _ _1 4 `+` i -i : �L °t I '"7 +7� 1 �-
���ra [ #-1} �'1��11 (-•�[�, _ .1 ,'-a 7� t< ,n �•eJl.._ ; �.1- r [�r
� rilk r J L Y {ry-_lu' ( r , { •s� Ij 3 r. _t �" +,�. - :,
'r tt t-
� . J��i�;'f ,�� Yet J } - x •�.; � _ f} - n � �, � � �;�+� �.... •� rC,4 T+:r{4, 1•.'"i.•fk�'�..�' ���3' ` -�s:� _ � s�" �' r c 1 L�� ��'+h- � t ; s �_� �•--� �lr� - . ��� _
_ .l i t• 1' n* ^.� t•' -',: ,N 'rt 3 ,` -,.F:I `.� T - :'i, A 5 _ . ^e�.T r>'
00
17
�i.ri"� .,��._ 'f - 't���t. { + L ( J�l[j� �} ' }} � �_ , 1�i y • ---4 r l�n.
�.{ � 61" •,I .t— '�1.1 1 {�' 1 2i 'CY r• hl �C:�t f__ ,RI wY: ��.,�L �\�{ ' .` ` I /!
,,� � ,t,�. 1'� �i��r' \ J �1'1 4 4 Jy{�j� � ,•' '.� � �y�Li 111 �. � } 1 I / l -
`�;
{!�� fH � ' l�I�''y__`�i.i'�� .__� `\ � ` �F e'��lr Y1 - •� .. ` ",. { w f �x",-t��, - n
11•� J i+l � � R. -�. • �.e. �`"1 •L:.Aw'. � �u�,�i'pu. .i 1' 1�;' • � �i 1 r _
.r+y Gi f`f w t, �1, r- r i�- '7AllyT� t'�, f }_. r -r�1 r• r ti i� _ W. _�
# tf� �� � O � � � i� h �"-T ` Q ' I r - r �Yy� }l1t � -! � ib. _ •` ' r� _�
c:`7: '�. � y_ 7.+ G.f + •7R/ti: - `# 5 r�,- - � �t �' Jar - -i �- � � -- '- F �� �� s
r,� � �� . w ram. F -LI - 4 i i�' J' � C/' _ �...:•[r'Y�'~.... �- �<r ;. •j" r r +Y;
24 .yAll
�l `, r �i � , ks�) t t'r ��tl < - '7a ♦ -- � �'" riy,��«�..>Sf R • :� '' _ # ^� ._� r '\ ..
#� V] ��s 1k � �" - � �•F+ r i - r i} ,�,.�. �� •rc,.• � � r f�r`#'- l�y w�v:'S'.a � • . - !�.
F'°i { i ty • F I d J ry 1 c b y �4
'•.r� t Y t - f ,' .f. _ ryr s4`' M • - - - - : + '! •fE""I ��- lr r
.ram, � �rr<-• • t
� _ t zitz � ��I' �+� �� �t :r [ r i -ti• v� r. i .'+'�:� ,�� a�- �; �S'� LtSJr � -'
{-�"'•C fKY�� xl r �::Y * St+:� +�>�.:s ( {r ff' r � y�l �'"rzfS.$ '�' �:� _ .ir •K+� -'S1 ..
�,`fz.LY'Y �� t r T •�• ,t�fF iA r -4' -T .'r 'r J t-J1 - ..� b �:Q s` :r±w „ _ i � �-:, `i x J }<, S 1 �- ,
+.i=`-:1rt���'�- ��� 7-iit'� i�Y.J..S;.l4:tY'- ,1. q�i' "+1- kt, )� - i�"F �a �t-ir `- #� t�i?a1 �• �i �1{�,
,�•�
TX
`�� CoY,- �'� !� !! Ur �r .:4 �•l. I f Ii. � �s4.wJ x4 ,�} • L
i-1L?
tw "r �:1'�«r .�i�i',s :� Y i • �'r� _ t+ °' .; V �• sa• T'. ,{S # „ �,+, i' N 1 f, �l
2L is.J�i<}l,�.. r 33. 'r%'�4 a.;Y.E. a_ '�� � � 1.t 1, - � •,. _. -Y s _ t � t - � ut - S„�'•� • :} � ' }'4
Rol
� � >;:,! ,��,`;� I�i�i� � }i . I � i , �3 . , +-' - ] � -'A � � =,�'-.r � r{'� it r • � .� ; ,.u',9*}` '1 d ' ,-Y - -
�° A: id {�Ai'�'�da � �� -o fh^ '•R � .� +_l- i+'-�_ _- rr��. 't �, 1 �� •� E � «i
�11.v--j��%J� � Y t!1 d��,,�, "si � „t.S '•�.:•}�r$! ' � �r.. r_ _ F;` • �- � r A � �� i � q�3
� �; S,:F jr -t��1 yr. �•.�� .(` _ a% � �, ♦n .a I .• ;`� s �+I TKt�. ��-_ i '< ,�rL�1
I; � 'r � � °�,,,^ "`'t'• m.ti' � vim. tJ.�. Y % � J a :FS. �'
t ' � j y - s ' 1 �T r -'- +1•' ✓� 1'�.'t �. ! 14= E.-rs
r ��};#1�� �,i lt�l �'�....,� � -k... r� lr •x �32: +'�1�''']�r ki�� -n � JT♦� 't _ .i� � •i ! �� fi 3 �i !� � � .r � �i '� �'2 t_r �=Y'
V -:f'd $r vrfy� Yr� YY��ike ?�:}E k ,n rry� r a rr . r ' i•. r�: �. , i ,id C iif�v - .t f;
1j$.ti4df•��',v,. ��'i�i�rk't ;.�'{a 1Jtti �^lf" ;al .,�'�' •�';�j`?} ,:#AI' S '+ r/ �� _,P "^i ;�-^' 'a i _ 7:-.:
" "i s ,,• ��� f T��:�� � � 4' .,� s� ' S. '. � y�, � '1 . r` 't' .:_r r fsi �' t,{`�SI � •-�'� ,��4; 1
1i—V4
I'li _ ;r.^ 't r �.1T�;� ��L� � �,.r. r..r .€ h k� 1 � •", �5; •/�.:•"3. � '_.1 ��dr � 7 '} ._�y h �!' i`-:���,-�V'i-- .S. �h� :�v'I��`r�{�. � 'i�� .� ,j� Y ' �.�(� t1 �3.d .Y•'• i''S _ - �' •,i ,+'',a?s:t}7r. "S
ay ,�� •»s...:`�t �,.,^��-. �,� ,Y[�y i �'.ra';'?�i7' :>x�°'+F'��.,,ti�+`�•'�� ` h :• i,' "I .fie .r: �.e �.�ra•:ti-�j.-•'i�-� r r-{:�.. -a ..v:• _ ��y, d
'u- `y'�•:ri. �Y' dl i _r ,�-, id.r „vs �x,;�, 1, t'1ct�JTs. .. -R' 'I f"'� ' 1 J .♦ i -§4b_ .;i7?' ,.. f._is< 11. �`,
'r'-t' L..`:iy <�°`�rhw1,� i-:tfi r I ' Ff :a• vJ'i ci �` !',� 't` s;a `"fe-, !�'-. _ 4..
'�F <''���-: 7T _e• �„ -'cr ff--{l���;,f11;,i i�i,-:�t��;S4 "•��' l �� i _ �° =�t� �r.Fa_• ri::£f ��'� '�{� l��i:l�.,'f yX
'.r �•A. ,i•' :t�• .'i_P jt�Ty�,ti. Y :.7't�I r j M ,!��-�,�'>}.?t_ a}{ � >:1' 1.•Ocf4t[ [ I Y riL+- '� .1 i!. 'T � 7Y'• !'� + J`'
;'� y;"'- ': �r�.rY,: Itit�i- �fll... ;Is �'7t ,'t'..� .�.�� ���• -[�:7 i � .� -!J7 •.{y�.'�r!} fs. - ',ti= f i'� C '. EE:�4
+.; .� ;" J. '-T.:: r, ri.�!='yh - , �� rj e7 _ �. � .•a � `:; �T• �l _ {;Y:�.f,'.�.r 1i }� �rt'�r_� ��
t ! '4�` r +�,�r �;7� a I {ti�'tn di �, ,� 'ha �14'+1 �F��.',.i�. 'Y�;! `-� ' _ :� �� �f •a, r '�•- � � _ r'a..�..j ]I=.. >,':
`� e q, L -'•, r� '� 7 T�Ir I P j t ' ^ ♦ � v ST^ r- r -;. `� •.8: ,- E`�
_# a k Ir. �`'. r ' r .r:'�,fi..14 !a � a � t `,fi^' r �r`.. • - y � .• i � �
_..i4.¢j-
tLull
..1�, 11 '��' x""*'��.�'+��: v� ;,�d�•. r -r.,- v `� �� -r - �i �.t' �,<<c >z.l'�ti7l .� �., _
i4 i L T r-°5 1 + + I b rell'S t �rf!' a', � s� x� '3?f� p` ' ft C• iri'.. 3 '. c'.^�• If *1
t •-, Y ';t. .,;�� f,,,,t >rt �•_�:'�. R -.i 1�. i r 4�P a J- - :t i� _ --1 -} i',
'+ - ... � _a ( T;'. -`"' _ �• - J "% + L � S.�a1`-•#s"r r- �_..,7�r �'1 - •� t� -.+. ':i S•i: sa "�-t: �l:
. .. ti •1" . ' .. -4' 1' }j�r•' '<' }! ' �` -� s C,. -i r ,. �.Ft':�.�• i-' r ' � r - r H; `�J_`'" '"(.�^y� i 7 - . T.a` y,L:a ", R � _ ..
- F '-i .. f. •�, ast kiT. '`i--•r-a �A ; ` .. �. '. t -lt z: . •ice - - Y`"fir ,7
r.r3, h<,rlf a•J :' .s"�..r•t•.-- _ . �L•r:" : .-�.:-:):i �. • y:. j`

Narrative
The Miller Farm
The Miller Farm is a pardnership by Irene, Mike and Robert Miller. The farm is planned for 200 Milk
Cows.
Additional animals not being milked such as dry cows, heifers and calves are managed at a separate
pastured farm and are not included in this plan.
The Milk herd is managed on pasture 50% of the time and in the feedlot, freestall or milking parlor
the other 50%. The feedlot, and freestall waste is scraped and stockpiled for up to 90 days on the
upper part of the feedlot. The feedlot runoff, storm water, milking parlor wash water and animal
waste flushed from the parlor waiting area are collected and stored in the Waste Storage Pond (WSP)
for up to 180 days. Waste is flushed from the parlor waiting area using recycled water from the WSP.
The waste and wastewater stored in the WSP are disposed of by irrigation on cropland using a
traveler irrigation system. Solids are spread on pasture and cropland.
In the event, that total comfinement is required and all the waste is collected in the WSP, storage
capacity is sufficient to hold waste for 90 days.
It is important on this farm to estabish a history of soil and waste sample results to make the best
use of the nutrient produced on this farm. Slurry waste should be sampled during each irrigation
following agitation of the WSP. Solid waste should be sampled at the time of spreading. Test results are
needed to complete required records for animal waste disposed of. The soil test are required to
monitor the nutrient and mineral levels in the fields used for disposal.
CROP NOTES
The Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) to be applied to crops following soybeans must be reduced by 20 lbs.
due to N carry over. The soft ware does this automaticly, but it should you alter the rotation, you will
need to adjust for your records.
All corn is planned for silage. If the com is not needed and harvested for grain the PAN must be reduce
by 45 %.
If small grains are not needed for silage or hay and harvested as grain, the PAN is nearly the same and
no adjustment is needed. If Small Grain us used for cover crop, only 25 lbs. of PAN can be applied,
and the PAN applied to the following crop must be reduced by 25 lbs.
The symbol* is shown beside some RYE and PAN amounts on the Waste Utilization Tables. Approved
RYE and PAN data for these crops are not available for the soil types they are being grown on. Yield
information from Memorandum by Dr. Jim Green, Chairman of the NC State University Forage
Production Workgroup, dated 5-29-98 was used for Rescue Grass( Matua Grass).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•-----------------------
124255 Database Version 2.0 Date Printcd: 02-12-2003 Narrative Page 1 of 2

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate; of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by
manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be
applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the
total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the mmnure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if an waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be
used to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be gown, Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field_
%NJ_D*o { T.M.
See CROP NOTES in the Narrative Section of Additional Information
VnaM II
Iraa
field
Source
1.1).
Soil Scries
'Total
A.-Te
Use.
Auwi
Cn
RYE.
Ahplic.
l"ri d
Nitropol
PA
Nutrient
Regfd
C'onuu.
Fert.
Marian
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Mcluul
Manure
PA
Nutrialt
Applied
liquid
Manure
Applied
(a,-Te)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(field)
Solid
1lannre
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
I(If)o
A21JA
k1315
If)00 t1s
Itx14
19016
1
1129
CC61
36.00
11,40
Small Orain, Silage)llay
9.8'I'm%
*10/1-3J11
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.1x1
25
0.00
289.60
19016
1
1129
1 CeLi1
36.00
11.40
Sorjmm-Sudan Ilay
4.3 Tars
*411-XI31
212
t)
(I
Inroad.
212
opo
49
0.00
561.42
19016
1A
1129
c"A
6.30
6.30
Small Gram, SilagelHoy
9.81'ons
*loll-3/31
109
0
0
Irrip,
109
39.7K
o
250.61
0.00
191116
IA
1128
CC61
6.30
6.30
Sorghum -Sudan Ilay
4.31rals
*411-8131
212
0
0
IrriP,
212
77.37
t)
487.42
0 W
19016
111
1128
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Small (train, Silage/llay
9.81'als
*10/1-331
1091
0
0
brig.
109
39.7X
0
240.63
0.0o
19016
11
1128
Cmil
6.20
6.20
Sorghum-Sudan flay
4.3 Tans
*4f1-8J31
212
0
tl
Irrip.
212
77.37
0
479.68
0.00
19016
IC'
1129
C'eril
6.20
6.20
Small (kaol, SilageJllay
9.9 Tins
010/1-3111
109
0
0
Irrig,
log
39.7K
0
246.63
0.011
19016
IC
1129
Ceil
6.20
6.20korglutm-Sudanllay
4.3Tars
*411-9131
2121
0
0
Irrit:
212
" 77.37
0
479.68
0.00
19016
11)
1128
Cull
5.90
5.90
Small Gram, silage/llay
9.8"fops
*1011-3131
109
0
0
Irrip,
109
39.79
0
234.70
o.4K)
19016
11)
112K
('Mil
5.90
5.90
Sorghtinr-Sudan flay
4.3 Tons,
*411-IR 1
212
0
tl
Imp,
1 212
77.37
11
456.47
0 N)
------------ _ _. _ .. ------------------- - --- ---- - - -------.
124258 Dalabase Vcrsio» 2.0 Dale Printed. 2/12103 WUT Page I

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.1).
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
:ILL es
Crop
RYE.
rlpplic.
Period
Nilrogur
PA
Nutrimt
R%xjd
(NIA1
Conun.
Fail.
Nutrimi
Applied
-fib
Iles.
(16s/A)
Applic.
Mfdhod
Maoun:
PA
Nutriait
Ariplizd
Liquid
Marture
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Mlanure
Applied
(acTe)
Liquid
Mlaiture
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Miurure
Applied
(Field)
I N
N
N
11rs/A
1000
l aal/A
w4is
1000 w1s;
lays
19016
2 Gr
1.129
Coil
8.00
8U)
Fesume Hay
4.4 Tons
8/1-7131
195
0
0
Broad.
1 195
0-00
45
0.00
362.39
19016
2 Ev
U29
Coil
33.00
33.00
Small Grail, Sila&A lay
9.8 Tons
* 10/1-3/31
0
(1
0
Broad
0
o.00
0
0.00
0.00
19016
2 Ev
U29
Coil
33.00
33.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
*5/15-9/15
144
0
0
Broad,
144
0-00
33i
0.00
1,103.89
19016
2 Od
1129
C.xil
33.001
3 3.001
Corn, Silaga
20.5'1'ons
2115.6/30
273
0
20
Broad,
203
0.00
47
0.00
1,556.18
19016
2 t)d
U29
Coil
33.00
33.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tans
*10/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad
109
0.00
25
0.00
835.59
19016
3
1129
1 C061
3.20
3.20
1.eHay
4.21'ans
811-7/31
186
0
0
Broad
186
0.00
43
0.00
138.27
19016
4
U28
C.1k71
3.20
3.20
Fescue flay
4.2 Tans
8/1-7/31
186
0
0
Broad.
196
253.13
U
810.02
0.00
190161
5
U29
Cecil
17.10
17.10
Small Grain, Silage/11ay
9.6'fons
*10/1-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
19016
5
U29
Coil
17.10
IT 10
Soybean Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
*5/15-9/l5
144
0
0
Broad,
144
0.00
33
0.00
572,02
19016
6
1129
CAYI
9A0
8.10
Cam, Silage
20.0'rons
2115-6/30
218
0
20
Broad
199
0.00
46
0.00
372,56
19016
6
U29
Coil
8.10
8.10
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.6 Tons
*1011-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
107
0.00
25
0.00
201.34
19016
7
IJ29
Coil
12,80
12.80
Rescuegrass Hay
N/A
811-7/31
U
0
0
Broad
0
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
19016
8
U29
Coi!
3.30
3.30
Cum, Silage
20.5'fons
2115-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.011
47
0.00
155.62
19016
8
U29
Coil
3.30
3,30
Small Grain, Silagdllay
9.8'1'ons
41011-3131
109
0
0
Broad.
109
(1,00
25
0.00
8156
19022
1
U29
ICNil
4-50
4.50
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tans
811-7131
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
34
0.0o
153.67
19022
2
(329
Coil
1.40
1.40
Fescue Pasture
4.4'I'ons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
34
0.00
47.91
19022
3
U29
Cmil
4.40
Fescue Pasture
4.41ons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.011
34
0.0{1
150.25
19022
4
U29
Coil
3.00
Fesme Pasture
4.4 Tons
9/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
34
0.00
102.4419022
5
U29
Coil
r3.00
8.10
Fescue Pasture
4A Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.0034
0.00
276.60
19022
6
1129
('oil
.
6.20
Fescue Pasture
4.6'I'urts
8/1-7131
153
0
U
};mod,
153
0.00
3G
0.U{1
22U.3G
--------------------- ---- --- ---------------------------- -----------------------------------
124258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 WUT Page 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tray
Field
Source
1-1),
Soil Series
Total
.Acre
Use.
Arne
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitro,
PA
Nutrient
Rel'd
Cilium
Fat.
Nulriatt
Applied
J
Res.
(lbslA)
Applit:.
Method
ManurO
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(afire)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
IbsJA
1000
gal/A
tolls
1000 Pals
tilts
I'txal Applied, 1000 glllets
3.69l.94
.
Liquid Manure
Total ProduecA 1000 gallons
1,187,27
'.
Balance, 1000 gallons
-2,504.58
Total Applied, tons
'.z -fi: s ',: `,
7 182.63
Maclure Solids
I'txal PruduLv d, tarts
i4,
850.00
Balanw, tons
=
6,332.61
Nines: I. In the Iract c-olurm, synibut — nt�-tts leased, utltenvise, owned. 2. Symbol * meats user entered data.
-- - -- -- -- -- --------------------------- -- ---- ---`-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
124258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 WUT Page 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Traa I
Field
Source
1. 1).
Soil Series
Total
Arse
Use.
Ages
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogut
PA
Nutriou
Reu'd
r A I
Commit.
Fert.
Nutriml
Applied
HWA)
Res.
Ohs/A)
Applie,
Method
Manure
PA
NULrielll
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(uae)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(atn)
Utptid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
I1latuire
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N I
lbs/A
1U00
pal/A
ttvl.q
IOOo Pals
tolls
19016
1
U29
CAil
36.00
11.40
Small Graitt, SiIagJHay
9,8'I'orts
*1011-3/31
109
0
0
Mr d.
109
O1 00
25
0.00
288.66
19016
1
U29
Cecil
36.00
11.40
Sorghunt-Sudan tiny
4.3 Tons
*411-8131
212
0
0
Broad.
212
0.09
49
0.00
561.42
19016
IA
L128
Cecil
6.30
6.30
Small Grain, SiIagJHay
9,8 Totis
*10/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irrip,
109
39.78
0
250.61
0.00
19016
IA
U28
Cecil
6.30
6,30
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3'rons
*411-8/31
212
0
0
brig.
212
77.37
0
487A2
0.00
190 161
lB
U28
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 "fans
* 10/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irrip,
109
39.78
0
246.63
0.00
19016
IB
U28
c"jl
6.20
6.20
Sorgttunt-Sudan Huy
4.3'1'ons
*411-8/31
212
0
0
Imp,
2121
77.37
0
479.68
0.00
19016
IC
1128
Cecl
6.20
6.20
Stnall Grain, SiIagJHay
9.8 Tons
*10/1-3/31
109
0
0
[nip.
109
39.78
0
246.63
0.00
19016
IC
U28
Call
6.20
6.20
Sorghum -Sudan flay
4.3 Tons
*4/1-8/31
212
0
0
Imp,
2121
77.37
0
479.68
O.OU
19016
11)
U28
Cavil
5.90
5,90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
*I0/1-3131
109
0
0
Imp.
109
39.79
0
234.70
0.00
19016
lD
U28
Cecil
5.90
5.90
Sorghum-Sudan Hay.
4.3"runs
*4/1-8/31
212
0
0
Imp,
212
77.37
0
456.47
OAX)
191116
2 Ur
U29
Cecil
8.00
8.OU
Faseu.: flay
4.41.mis.
811-7/31
195
0
0
Broad,
195
0.00
45
0.00
362.39
19016
2 Ev
L129
Cai1
33.00
33.00
Small Gram, SilagJJHay
9.8'1'ons
*10/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.00
25
0.00
835.59
19016
2 Ev
U29
Cai1
33.00
33,00
Com, Silage
20,5 Tons
2115-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.00
47
0.00
1,556.18
19016
2 Od
U29
Cecil
33.00
33.00
Small Grain, Silagafflay
9.9 Tcnts
*10/1-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
E)
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
19016
2 Od
U29
Cet:iI
33.00
33.00
Soybeans, Manuned, Wuble Cron
37 hu.
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0,00
33
0.00
1,103.89
19016
3
U29
Ctx:il
3.20
3.20
FescveIlay
4.2'Pons
-8/1-7/31.
186
0
0
Broad.
186
0.00
41
0.00
139.27
19016
4
U28
Cal(
3.20
3.20
Fesale'Ilay
4.2Tons
8/1-7131
186
0
0
Broad.
186
253,13
0
810.02
0.00
19016
5
U29
Cecil
17.10
17.10
Sntall Grain, SilagJJHay
9.6 Ttuts
*10/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad,
107
U.(H)
25
0.00
425.04
19016
5
U29
Cecil
17.10
17.10
Com, Silage
20,0 "Pons
2/15-6130
21 R
0
20
1Iroad.
198
0.00
46
0.00
796.52
19016
6
U29
Cecil
8.10
8.1OSmalI
Grain, SilagJllay
9.6'fotts
*I011-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
q
0.00
0
0.00
O.W
19016
6
U29
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
*5/15-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
OM
33
0.00
270.96
19016
7
U29
C.cil
12.80
12.80
Restvegrass Hay
N/A
1 8/1-7/31
0
0
0
Broad.
1 0
0.00
o
O.OU
O.t10
- - --- - --- -- -- --- ----- -- - - -
124258 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 WUT Page 4

Waste Utilizes ioli Table
Y.ar
I'ra�t
Field
Source
I.D)
Soil Series
'I'M]
Acre
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period.
Nitrogen
PA
Nutriott
RNd
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(IWA)
Applic.
Method
ldanurc
1'A
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(ac7e)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(akn)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Alauutre
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ihs/A
1000
gtl/A
texts
1000 gals
t(nIS
19016
8
U29
cail
3.30
3,30Sr»aII
Grain, Silage/llay
9.8Tons
•10/1-3131
1)
0
0
Broad.
U
0.00
0
11.00
0.00
19016
8
U29
Cavil
3.30
3.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
'5/15-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.00
33
0.00
110.39
19022
1
U29
Cecil
4.50
4.50
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad,
147
000
34
0,00
153.67
19022
2
U29
Coil
1.40
1.40
FesarePaAure
4.4'rons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.00
34
0.00
47.91
19022
1 3
U29
Leell
4.40
4.4U
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7/31
147
0
0
Broad,r1471000
34
0.00
150.25
1
19022
4
U29
Cecil
3.00
3.00
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
0,00
34
0.00
102.44
19022
5
U29
Cmil
8.10
8.10
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
811-7131
147
0
0
Broad.
0.00
34
0.00
276.60
19022
6
U29
Cocil
6,20
6,20
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
153
0
0
Broad.
0.00
3fi
0,00
220.36
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
3,691.84
.'
Liquid Manure
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
1,187,27
r ,
Halanw, 1000 gAil nts
-2,504.58
Total Applied, tuns
:,
7,390.44
Manure Solids
Totat Produwd, Ions
5.
850.00
1lalams, IentS
-6,540,44
Notes: 1. to the tract column, s1'mbol -- me:uts leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Synihol' means user c3ttered data.
1242i8 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 WUT Page 5

Narrative
The Miller Farm Animal Waste Sources
Animal Waste is collected both as liquid slurry and as solids from the same area. In this
plan, 50% collected as slurry and computed using Slurry Tables and 50% is collected as a Solid and
computed using the Surface Scraped tables.
U28 - Miller Farm Slurry
Slurry collected as animal waste, surface runoff, wash water, storm storage, and rainfall
in the Waste Storage Pond
From the Miller Farm Waste Storage Pond Design,180 Day Storage, Page 2, Normal Pump out
volume.
1,187,265 gals. animal waste is collected each year and require disposal.
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) from this source
200 dairy cows x 14 gals/cow/day x 50% of source x 50% confinement x 365 days divided by
x 14 lbs N/1000 gals. = 3577 lbs of PAN
U29 - Miller Farm Solids
Solids are collected and stored on the lot is a stock pile for up to 90 days.
200 Milk Cows x 93 lbs x 50% of source x 50% confinement x 365 days divided by 2000 lbs/ton
= 849 tons/year.
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) from this source
849 tons x 4.3 lbs/tcn = 3649 lbs. of PAN annually
-- -------------- --------
124'25s Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-12-2003 Narrative Page 2 of 2

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U28
Miller Dairy Slurry waste generated 1,187,266 gals/year by a 200 animal
.Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility
has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
3576
Incorporated
4877
Injected
5527
Irrigated
3251
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
[Year 1
8,491.80
3,691,843
-2,504,577
ear 2
8,491.80
3,691,843
-2,504,577
U29
Miller Dairy Solids waste generated 850.00 tons/year by a 200 animal
Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
3659
Incorporated
4850
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Quantity Applied
(Tons)
Surplus/Deficit (Tons)
Year 1
30,919.50
12,473,52
-11,623.52
Year 2
31,814.10
9,832.39
-8,982.39
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
--------------------------
Note: In source ID. S means standard source. U means user defined source.
993926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-12-2003 Source Page I of 1

Ll
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
2
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
= 2 &
oderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (390) should be planned.
< = 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
soluble nutrient leaching below the
improve the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency
10
root zone.
should be considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients,
Sod -Based Rotations (328). Long -Tenn No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such
as Fiber Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
-------------•-------•-------------------------------------------------;--------- -------------------
- ----- - ------ --- ------ -
'93926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-12-2003 PCS Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Svmbol * means user entered data.

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field.
Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each
field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (1.1)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
19016
1
36.00
11.40
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, SilageMac
9.8 Tons
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
19016
1.
6.30
6.30
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage'Hay
9.8 Tuns
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
19016
IB
6.20
6.20
15.0
Cocii
Small Grain, SilageHay
9.8 Tans
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
19016
IC
6.20
6.20
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.8 Tons
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
19016
IDI
5.90
5.90
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.8 Tons
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
19016
2 Or
8.00
8.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
19016
2 Eti
33.00
33.00
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage'Hay
9.8 Tons
Sovbeans, Manured. Double Crop
37 bu.
Com. Silage
20.5 Tons
19016
2 Od
33.00
33.00
15.0
Cecil
Corn, Silage
20.5 Tons
Small Grain. Siiag&Hay
9.8 Tons
Soybeans, Manured. Double Crop
37 bu.
19016
3
3.20
3.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hav
4.2 Tons
19016
4
3.20
3.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.2 Tons
19016
5
17,10
17,10
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silageflay
9.6 Tuns
Soybeans, ,4lanured_ Double Crop
37 bu.
Com. Silage
20.0 Tons
19016
6
8.10
8.10
13.0
Cecil
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tonsil
Soybeans, Manured. Double Crop
37 bu.
190 [6
7
12.80
12.80
15.0
Cecil
Rescuegrass Hay
0.0 Tons
19016
8
3.30
3.30
15.0
Cecil
Com, Silage
20.5 Tons
Small Grain, SilageJHay
9.8 Torts
Soybeans, Manured. Double Crop
37 bu.
19022
1
4.50
4.50
13.0
evil
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
19022
2
1,40
1.40
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
19022
3
4.40
4.40
15.0
Catil
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
19022
4,
3.00
3.00
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
19022
5
8.10
8.10
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Toms
19022
6
6,20
6.20
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 209.90 185.30
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'93926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-12-2003 PCS Page I of 2
NOTE: Svmbol * means user entered data.

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maadmum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(indhewhour)
.Application Amount
(inches)
19016
1A
Cecil
0.40
1.0
19016
1B
CeLil
0,40
1.0
19016
iC
Cecil
0.40
1.0
190161
1D
Cecil
0.40
1.0
NOTE: symbol *means user entered data.
------ ------------•-------- ---------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
993926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 IAF Page I

a
The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The
start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first
crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. if the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the
design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application
interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Availahle Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
Miller Dairy Slurry
Design Storage Ca acity ays
Start Date
19115
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
180
1
3
149
1
4
119
I
5
150
1
6
180
1
7
149
1
8
180
1
9
150
1
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
1.49
2
1
118
2
2
152
2
3
I21
2
4
91
2
5
122
2
6
180
2
7
149
2
8
180
2
9
150
2
10
180
2
11
180
2
12
149
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------------------------------------------.------ ----- --
993926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 02-12-2003 Capacity Page 1 of I

•
Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops .or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur'during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
--. ..--------- - -
993926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 Specification Paae 1

4
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10- Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy -
It. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
993926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 Specification Paae 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A
regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
993926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 Specification Page 3

14
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions
require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste .
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
--- -- - --- - ---- ---- -
993926 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 2/12/03 Specification Pap-e 4

State of North Carolina 0
Department of Environment�.;�;,�. z,1,
and Natural Resources xa.� -°: •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NOV 8 5ONORTH
Bill Holman, Secretary CDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director �1llliili4' CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
~NMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
November 4, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Robert Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Road
Salisbury, N.C. 28147
Subject: Animal Waste Management Plan
Certification
Facility Number 80-14
Rowan County
Dear Mr, Miller:
Upon submitting your certification to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), you requested a conditional
approval on your Application and Handling Equipment Installation, Section III.D. According to this certification, -
your conditional approval was supposed to be installed by July 7, 1999. Please contact your technical specialist to
recertify Section III.D of the Animal Waste Management Plan Certification and resubmit the certification form to our
office as soon as possible.
Enclosed is an Animal Waste Management Plan Certification Form. For your convenience, you may fill out
just the highlighted sections of the new form and return this with the originally signed certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before 30 days of
receipt of letter.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone],
extension 571.
Sincerely,
Sonya L. Avant
Environmental Engineer
Attachments
cc: Mooresville Regional Office — Division of Water Quality
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
R. Bruce Rider, Natural Resources Conservation Service — Salisbury Field Office
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 11, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Farm Number: 80 - 14
Dear Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller:
r JKVWA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Miller Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage under an
Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixi'y (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partialiy completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone] extension 502 or Alan
Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
for
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
Sincerely,: °
Kerr T. Stevens
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources 1" '
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
1 • NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsouRCEs
J1.Q Dom up
M"'ROONMENT, IZAL rM
November 13, 2000 0 NATURAL RXS0U1ZCn
IRENE H,-MIKE, ROBERT MILLER Nov 17 2000
MILLER FARM
3510 MILLER RD W1gSlolf pF �Y�!(1gdf1AL �A#AStI®i
SALISBURY NC 28147 a�OR69lflttf BEBt1IIlAt OFFF
ATTN: ROBERT MILLER
Subject: Application No. AWC800014
Additional Information Request
Miller Farm
Animal'Waste Operation
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Robert Miller:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the
subject application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please
address the following by January 13, 2000:
1. Please sign and date page 1 of your enclosed certification farm.
2. Please provide your irrigation parameters and design information. Your current waste
utilization plan is missing information regarding your irrigation parameters. Please note
that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the
technical specialist.
3. Please provide clearer maps that identify (outline or highlight your fields) and shows the
acreage for each field to be used for waste application. I could only find Tract 19016,
field #1, the other listed fields I could not locate on the map'provided.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before
January 13, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with
15A N.C.A.C.•2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
NCDENR-Non Discharge Permitting Unit (attn: Theresa Nartea)
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer. . 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 80-0014
Robert Miller
Page 2
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid
permit is a.violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the
enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension
375.
Sincerely,
Theresa Nartea
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Attn: Robert Miller
Dear Mr. Robert Miller:
A4
1 2000
glumlN C D EN R
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANr> NATURAL RESOURCES
September 7, 2000
Subject: Application No. AWC800014
Additional Information Request
Miller Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has received an incomplete application package from your farm. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please provide the needed items on the attached "Required Items
Checklist" by November 7, 2000.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information
should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below.
NC-DENR-Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
ATTN: Theresa Nartea
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before November 7, 2000 or the Division will return
your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be
operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 375.
Sincerely,
Theresa Nartea
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: CMooresvi II R! ee gional Office; Water-Qualit�
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

J
3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 250 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP):
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): '�
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or O (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present'in the vicinity or -under the lagoon(s)? YES o NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, SS dards, etc.) (Swine Only)
WSor NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WIF.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
&t
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 80 -14

.� W A TF1�
`OHO 9QG Mlet F. Easley
Governor
Z William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
>_ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 21, 2002
Robert Miller
3510 Miller Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
Subject: Miller Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage 4: 800014
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Miller
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 20, 2002. Based
on his observations, the facility appeared to be in compliance with the facility's certified farm plan. Enclosed
please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex G feason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
NCDENR
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

4W
fk
Type of Visit -Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facilitp Number 80 14 Dare of Visit. 8/211/2002 Time:
O Not O erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ®Certified 0 Conditionalh, Certified C Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: . ---..-
Farm Name: M] ix. Farw................. I......... ...................................... County: R Q.-
ffatl.........................- ......... Q- -- --
Owner Name: JrjWM,.D7jik _Rab_er-t.-.l�lille[----------------------------- Phone Nn: TA4:H57.9�87_--------------------------..
Mailing .address: 3510.1Y UIPr..lid........................................................................ Salishury...NC........................................................ Z81.4.7...............
Facility Contact: ......:.............................I.......................I,itic:............................................... ►one No:
......................................
Onsite Representative: RQ�F.RT_b7JLI-------------------------------- Integrator : -------------------------------------------
Certified Operator:RQi7urt.L ............................... m1, cr................................................ Operator Certification Number:ZZ4,Z2.............. ..............
Location of Farm:
(Located in the northeast corner of- the intersection of Weaver Rd. (SR 1535) and Miller Rd (SR 1509).
(General location: southeast of Millbridge.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35OF 36 30 Longitude F 80 • 36 30
'Design Current
Design %Current Design 'Current
�Ca acit Population
PontrC-TOP
tilation
❑ Wean to Feeder
,'
❑ Layer :•c ® Dairy 200 103
❑ Non -Layer I I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
=°
` ❑ Other
TptRliDC51 .. `LR RCl i 200
,. «f Totst1 SSLW : 280,000
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes .® No
Discharge originated at: [_]Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b, if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (li'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
«'ante Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Stnrcture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
identifier: ••--•--------•--•--------•-.......................... -•--•--•--•--•--•--•--•--............................. ...........................
Freeboard (inches): 42

Facility Number: Bo-14 Date of I nspection 8120/2002
t
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure -plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
trV11LMl�iCG
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
R No
❑ Yes
® No
Wasteyolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Sudex (Hay) Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
R No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required Records & I)ocuntents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ gn, maps, etc.)
WUP, , checklistsdesign,
Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
R No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
,N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no'further correspondence about this visit.
Qo "eatNO
s ref ue�tion # m�liiWmn y ,answerstand/or;aniyrecommenaatlous
r ;then' mments.��
edd s a cot#faciliftoetteciglalnsituations`(iise ddiion�pa_gesnecs
❑ ❑ Final Notes
Field Copy
"
tom. •
nal
o comments.
Reviewer/Inspector Name _ -�--- u- �-Vc
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /�
Date: 20

05103101 Continued"
l
.1
Facility Number: 80-14 Date of Inspection 8/20/2002 j�
T�
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
LW

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resourcesi4oblF
s Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C)1HHNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 2, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mike Miller
3510 Miller Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
15A NCAC 2H .0217
Miller Dairy Farm, Facility #: 80-14
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Miller:
This is the second notice of violation regarding your dairy. The previous notice was mailed
on May 5, 1997. However, the return receipt verifying your acceptance of the letter has not been
received by this Office. To ensure proper handling, Mr. Johnson verified the mailing address with
Mrs. Irene Miller.
Enclosed is the copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on April 30,
I997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or
deficiencies are indicated in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as
soon as possible.
Mr. Johnson had hoped someone would be available during the inspection. He delayed the
inspection for approximately 20 minutes after the arranged time of 3:00 p.m. before doing a limited
inspection of the facility. Mr. Johnson observed a discharge from what appeared to be the milking
parlor into a ditch which flowed into a wooded area. Surface water runoff from the paved lot also
emptied into the ditch. These discharges are a violation of the deemed permitted status pursuant
to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (a) and Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC
2H .0217.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by June 18, 1997 indicating the
actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address your response to Mr. Johnson.
919 North Main Street, 1110 �y�C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mike Miller
Page 2
Be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and
regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Acting Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell County Soil & Water Conservation District
Compliance/Enforcement File
AJ

.t
10 Routine p Complaint p o ow -up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 1 15:0!�7] 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: Registered
Farm Name: Miller.Yarm..................................................................................................... County: Rowan MRO
Owner Name: I:rene.11.32ke,.Robert.... Miller........................................................... Phone No: TII4-85T-9881...........................................................
Mailing Address: 35I1MiUc rAd..................................................................................... S.aua uiry...NO....................................................... 2RI4'2..............
Onsite Representative: NIA.................................................................................................. Integrator:............................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
...rNUMN:ntn ....... ....-::::...::... :.:saver r.:on;rx ..: ..: :.
---------------------------------
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ­­­­ ------------------------- ]
Latitude © a ®4 ®" Longitude ® s ®' ® 64
p Not Operational Date Last Operated: .....................................................................................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
® Yes ❑ No
Ig Yes ❑ No
p Yes ® No
l gal
p Yes
® No
® Yes
p No
[]Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
Continued on hack

8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structures
(Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9.
Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
[]Yes
p No
jFreeboard
(ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
Lagoon 4
..............NlA ..................................................................................................................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
[]Yes
p No
I I ..
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
p No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
[]No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Waste
Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Application
❑ Yes
p No
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ...........................UnkD mm ......................................................................................................
16.
Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
p Yes
p No
17.
Does the. facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the cover crop need improvement?
© Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
p No
For
Certified Facilities Only
20.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
21.
Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
p Yes
p No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
❑ No
23.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facgi;tKAssessment Unit
Date:
11/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL,
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mike Miller
3510 Miller Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
Dear Mr. Miller:
yl �
IDEEHNFzZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 5, 1997
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
15A NCAC 2H .0217
Miller Dairy Farm, Facility #: 80-14
Rowan County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on April 30, 1997 by Mr.
Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are
indicated in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
Mr. Johnson had hoped someone would be available during the inspection. He delayed the inspection
for approximately 20 minutes after the arranged time of 3:00 p.m. before doing a limited inspection of
the facility. Mr. Johnson observed a discharge from what appeared to be the milking parlor into a ditch
which flowed into a wooded area. Surface water runoff from the paved lot also emptied into the
ditch. These discharges are a violation of the deemed permitted status pursuant to North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.1 (a) and Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC 2H .0217.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by May 21, 1997 indicating the
actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address your response to Mr. Johnson.
For technical assistance, please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
representative.
Please Be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day
per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. If
you have any questions conceming this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone],
P.O. Box 29535, NW 4 FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 im f An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/10% post -consumer paper

Mike Miller
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Acting Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell County Soil & Water Conservation District
Compliance/Enforcement File
AJ

go�oF wArf9QG
`
t] �
Mike Miller
3510 Miller Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
Dear Mr. Miller:
Michael F. Easley
` Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
r' ! LA North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Subject:
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 16, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
Miller Farms, Facility #: 80-14
Rowan County., NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to coliect/anaiyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should he no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
AM —
) ENWR
Customer Service
1 800 623.7748
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johwri
Environmental Specialist 11
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

o�oF wAr�yQG
cot
o�� 111C
Robert Miller
3510 Miller Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
Dear Mr. Miller
Michael F. Easley 7�
Governor
William G. l:toss, Jr.,seoretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water duality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
February 5, 2001
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Miller Dairy, Facility #: 80-14
Rowan County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on January 31, 2001. Based
on his observations during the inspection the facility appeared to be in compliance with the facility's certified
farm plan. However, it was noted that the files could be better maintained. Enclosed please find the inspection
report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
J
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
NCDENR
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PRONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

of Visit IkCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit k1loutine O Complaint O Follow up. O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 1 Date of visit: 2 a Timc: !
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
© Permitted [3 Certified //[3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered
Farm Name: ............ ..........
. ..
Owner Name: ........ t::�.:t.:�..................... !�� ............. .. .................................
Facilitv Contact:
Title:
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold.. ....................__
C:ounty:............[^1.ty cA..t'�.............. .........
Phone No: ......5�'.7.... ......
� �?..�..�.................................
Phone No:
Mailing Address: ... 3..06....... 1171k-K. hGl(.......................................... .......�S.. <r �.a . �... ..4s,.................................... ..
Onsite Representative:......, �j._ ' ' .-----j' CJf 'C r............ .... Integrator:...,-
.........................................................................................................
Certified Operator:...... (�L?r—j....__........ ...................................... Operator Certification Number:`7---
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry tkEattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �• Longitude �• �° �•
Design Current
Swine Caoacit`• Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy �(
❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharnes & Stream Imnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes JNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State' (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [I Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? []Yes d,No
01/01 /01 Continued

Facility Number: - — Date'of Inspection}'
1 �
Waste Collection & Treatment { '
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches) ...... .................... ......................... ... ..... ...................... •............ ...••..............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes lk No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes In No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes dNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes allo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
-hE-
12. Crop type n't'u" l'I
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [lYes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
17. Are rock outcrops present? ❑ Yes No
18.
Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary?Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Reouired
Records & Documents
19.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
tj� No
20,
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
KNo
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑
21.
Does record kccping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
kQ No
23.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
allo
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 9No
25. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes t5No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes f!FNo
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �3 No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes t?No
01/01/01 Continued

acility Number ,� ; .....Date of Inspechon —� , .� _. ,_� �.:: �.k:,��:Priated on: 1/4/20p1,
30. Is there any evidence ofiivind drift during land application? {'i.e. residue be neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ` :❑ Yes ❑ No-"
-roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the -land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surfai= of the lagoon? []Yes ❑ No
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)" _ ❑ Yes DQ No
31 Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes D�.No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
7117
+ : pt
Reviewer/Ins ector Name �,x /. 3 r
P _�,,.,.,_...w...'_,��: ...:_f.... �,:....�9, _, d:. Ors.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
01/01/01
Date:

t-amiity NuMber —
qVctive O,lnactive. . ,
Lagoon, Lagoon Nu `' g onIdentifier
9 mbar.: � -� �� o .. _
Latitude: Longi#ude
By GP5 or Map? GPS ❑ Map GPSf file number:
35. Surface Area (acres):
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Water supply well within 250 ft of the lagoon?
f2 On -site ❑ Off -site
39. Distance to WS or HQW (miles):
40. Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 MRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards?
43. Was groundwater, encountered during construction?
44. Depth to Groundwater:
45. Spillway?
46. Adequate Marker? -
47. immediate threat to the integrity of the structure?
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Q less than 300 ft O 3DD it - 10DD ft greater than 1000 t
O Yes po
0<5 =10 0>1D
7-11"O Yes '@�No O Unknown
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes I.No
Yes O No
O Yes RNo
O Yes k7 No
2, 7.{-
JL
O Unknown
O Unknown

Untitled
Robert Miller
655 Weaver Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
Alan Johnson (water quality)
919 N. Main St.
Mooresville, NC 28115
When Rocky came to for our inspection. We found a discharge coming
from the irrigation reel. After seeing the discharge, I went to see why
it was leaking. I found the cut-off was not completely turned all the
way off. We have a flush for the milk barn that runs off the same pump.
It has a cut-off to each line. So,when I flushed the barn a little bit
of water ran to the reel and on the ground. In the future I will cut
off both the cut-off at the pump and the cut-off at the reel in the
field. No equipment was needed for the problem, just my error.
Sorry for the problem.
Robert Miller
Page 1
,�;C i;�c:'a, �t
` k}�Xlrl
w ay P

4 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NCDENR MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0=ober 9, 2000
.LAMES B. HUNT.JR.
GOVERNOR
Mr. Robert Miller
3510 Miller Road
Salisbury, North Carolina 28147
BILL HOLMAN
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral
:^die y
"...;..1
Miller Farm
'<<s
Facility No. 80-14
,_ ', s•
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Miller,
` ti . ' � .. X � •. _.' it
On October 3, an Operation Review was conducted of Miller Farm, facility no. 80-14.
This Review, undertaken in accordance withG.S. 143-215.10D, is one of two visits scheduled
for all registered livestock operations during the 2000 calendar year.
During the Review, it was noted that there was a discharge that bypassed your lagoon
system. Since any discharge that bypasses a lagoon system is a violation, your operation along
with supporting documentation was referred to the Division of Water Quality for further
..
investigation and possible enforcement action. G.S. 143-215.10E requires me to notify the
`<
Division of Water Quality and the owner/operator of this observed violation.
-
It is imperative that this problem be eliminated immediately. You are strongly
_
encouraged to contact your certified techni ;al specialist for help. You may also want to contact
your local Soil and Water Conservation District Office since they may be able to provide you with
additional technical and/or financial assistance to implement corrective best management
practices.
.. 44
Please remember that in order for vour facility to be in compliance with environmental
regulations, animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems must be properly sized, maintained
_
and operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates. your cooperation with this
Operation Review. Please do not hesitate to call me at 704/663-1699 ext. 276 if you have any
• --�....�*r-,
questions, concerns or need additional information.
_
Sincerely, /
Z)ow/ . �,
Rocky D. Durham
Environmental Engineer
CC" Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
❑SWC Regional Files
Q�
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLEOl109o' POST -CONSUMER PAPER

i
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
r • JAMES B. HUNT JR.
:'GOVERNOR
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 16, 2000
R' e'BiLL .HOLMAN ;Y `
'SECRETARY
Robert Miller
'
3510 Miller Rd.
I
Salisbury, NC 28147
_
KERR:T.•.STEVENS'.'_
1 DIRECTOR
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Miller Farm Facility #: 80-14
' - r
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Miller:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
June 15, 2000. Based on his observations made during the inspection the facility
appeared to be in good shape and the files appeared to be complete. Enclosed
please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
"M
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
o
Sincerely,
%
F_
A
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
II�j
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
— —
cc: File
_ram �-•-'^•�Y�. r.;:;,;.. ,; _=
•.�-"..�. �" tee'."". ,.-•-f
r w
- ­=4Q.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA ,28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
v�Nr-
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ! AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Division -of Soil and Water: Conservation - Oprsatiori'Review _: z jy -
�� E3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance.Inspecon
Tom:
Division of W
�ater Quality - CompLanee 3aspecbon x -� {,T �' Y •
r= „' - -� Other Agett>tCy- Uperhon Rcvievr ? `y _ _. '"m. • sx,-—..
IQ -Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-uv of DNVQ inspection Q Follow-uv of DSWC revieM- 0 Other
r
Date of'Inspection
aciiit�� Number
Time or Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted "�ertif"ied JCa ndi((tionaliy Certified C! Registered IE3 Not Operational pDate Last Operated:
Farm!Name:}-_c.. County:.......-....(tia.- .��.!'1..:..........
Owner Name: % !/��........................ Phone Na: ......-.. ...5 f� _........... - . r�.-.. .......... .t. 7.... ..�.�..
FaciiinContact:...................................✓........................................... Title.............................. .. `!Phone No: .......................................
Maiiin2Address:--...�z ��.........t.►.!...�J.�r............1?1�..................................... ...S 1�L�. k`x............................................ ....
Onsite Representative: ....... .S..k�.:.............. hi. �t.�.I'.Cr._............................._.. Intetigator:................................................................
kj_ b.h
Cc-Tified Operator:........,j�G l...rT............ ��•f.+. ...... Operator Certification Number:......�.z`
cation of Farm:
II ..
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
I
: ................................. ................................. ......................................................... ........................ ............................................................................................................. I......... r
t nude �• �. Longitude �' I.
Design Current
SKzne Capacity Population
I� �� can tq �eedcr I I
J Fe_derto Minish I i
1=; Farrow to wean }
I� Farrow to :.,edu. I �
C� F=ow to Finish I
I'D Gilts I I
ID Boars i
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
ID Laver t I air}' I a CC, i
I� Non -Laver } I .� !❑ Non -Dairy
Other I I
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spra► Field ArLt
Holding Ponds / Salid Traps No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
Discharces & Stream Impacts
i. Is an%- discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �KNa
Discharge originated a!: ❑ Lagoon J Spray Field ❑ Other
a. 1;' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. I+' discharge is ohscrvud. did it reach'Water of the State? (If ycs, notify DWQ)El Yes ❑ No
if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in ual/min?
C. Dees discharge hypass a lagoon systcm? (Ir yes. notify DWQ,) Yes ElNo
tncrc evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation." ❑ Yes JR No
Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ] Yes T�& No
I arty Collection L Treatment
is storage capacity (freeboard oius storm storage) ins titan adequate? K Spillwav ❑Yes &No
Structure i Structure ? Structure = Structure d Structure 5 Structure 6
16en05,_-r:
Fr,­_bouT— i tnuhcs;:
.................... .................................... ................................... ...... .............................. .................................... ....................................
.ire there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion. 0 Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
3 23194 Continued on back

i
,cility Number: Date of Inspection Printed itn: 4/24/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes gNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes X No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 1,'Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes g No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes *t No
Waste A lication
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? 40
Pending ❑PAN ❑Yes El No
12. Crop type C o CV1 , ,'l L G
I3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ,® No
14_ a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? •
❑ Yes
X�No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
S,No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
tzNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste INIanagement Plan readily available?
Yes
(ie/ WliP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑
&?N,+o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soiI sample reports)
❑ Yes
�Vo .
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
�No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
<No
22.
Fail to notify regiorial DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
&,No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
J�No
24,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
&No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
jQ No
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building -to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
JNo
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during [and application? (he. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
L
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
❑ No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
6No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
iK No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No

t
y Facility Number: -- Date of Inspecdon
Odor lssuLs
26.
Does the disc",
isc a pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagao storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not i osed of properly within 24 hours?
Yes
❑ No
28,
Is there any evidence of wind drift during Ian iication? (i.e. residue on neighb vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near t qui rface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
❑ No
30,
Were any major maintenance problems with t m ilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. br fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shut , etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31.
Do the animals feed storac, Ins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Do the flush n •s lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
-xamaonar t.Ammenrs anwor Drawings:
t V'J �� C� Q�� ti1Y s CGL-C '� PO S J 7.
3/23/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Dear Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller:
1 �LTW,A
IT •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONVENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NA:.. 2.r'c. Pr
gp9MON M F-' ,:'!'. 11E At.TM
December 30, 1999 0 NA,ruRAt- nc." URCiQ
JAI 5 2000
MW of WWWTAi MANAeEBM
gOs�Bll.1E 4a�� Q��
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 80-14
Rowan County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. I R1, IRR2, DRY I, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR I, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
Iiability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
9 /Z
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 29, 1999
Mike Miller
3510 Miller Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Miller Farms, Facility #: 80-14
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Miller:
During many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are often
missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review.
The following items must be available for review by the inspector during the inspection:
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas.
• Waste Application records, with accompanying waste analyses.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan, tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis information. Must have three years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan which must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a
-=� Notice of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also, remember that waste applications
should be made during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In
general, waste should be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
'•> M Alan D. Johns
w Environ e l Specialist
cc: File '~
S ` 919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2g1 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLEOl10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

lG Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other J
Facility Number U
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
ermitted (Certified Conditionally E3 Registered
Not Operational Date Last Operated:
CeCertified
�©
Farm Name: ...........�j14,11e..,........................T.....�-r.,['IIJ ............
County:............ LF ? Yl...........................................
Owner Name:r�.lr1,,.
.......... ► . .`ems.........,.�
Phone No: '-
....................
FacilityContact: .................... ..i.ki.`Qnitle:................................................................
�.b
Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: .�..�zo......M....�I.�CL..................................
—
.,_. j 7
Onsite Representative:....... L.............. Y/�
�
Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.......... ��j&... � ��
r.
... Operator Certification Number:,.,:�,*.Z,.7............
J,erFtion of Farm:
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
I ................ ................... I. ........... .......................................................................... ,.........,..........................................................I........................ .I....... .... ..... ...........
}
,. itude �� �� ��� Longitude
Desygnl Current,
"Design" Current" tDesign Current
Srnne Ca' i3C�t , g Poulatiore „„P,oultry'
„'Ca' self° 1'0 "ulataon Cattle ,, , ,"` Ca "aci Poulation'
:t+.
;" ❑Layer,
❑Dairy1/23
❑ Non -Layer
.. ❑ Non -Dairy
11
❑ Other
i
E _..
Total Design Ca�iac�ty�
j.
A ',�tf:1::
E
Number of I:agooris `,'' ;,' ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Feld Are!
�h
t '. `i! aAu'IE t 11'' fv ... . ..... ..... ........ ..._ ...
Holding Ponds I Qidl�Traps` �: ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
. - .' f
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow [o Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
l . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If" yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes AfNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ,KNo
Structure 6
identifier: �f Q�
Freeboard (inches): ...............!.... v........... ...............................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes b'No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? 0 Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes J�l No
[:)Yes %] No
[]Yes '® No
❑ Yes le•+ No
❑ Yes F No
❑ Yes JkNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 1Q No
❑ Yes t-No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes �:No
❑ Yes JQ No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes �.No
❑ Yes [1XNo
❑ Yes ANo
0: o viola igris:vr• ftrjeje ppie •iy�re �¢ted• dw.iog •this'visjt} • :YOi1 :Wiil•>�&Oiye 00 f}tapthgr: • . _
corres' 6fide>ace: about. this :visit.: • • : • . • . • • • .. - '
--�y:.s�, - r`.�ei � y-.:..,vas ��rs�tsx:i!�rm�. xr:n."�an>t -'rE .i M....:•:n ���- .��«ae��:r. _:+��een,..'a3in-
Comments! {refer Eoquestion #)Explain anyYsES answersandlor anyarecominendations or any other eominents sili1
`. §is.,'� -...: .,k4N-.',; J. S!sli .r : = 1{.!t::lC�' .'°: '# .`!uR �1 ,i• f,: 1 .: .'r. ., :"Y.�€F;�.: '1 °,�_:�..�� w f1q l:ot 1t.. �r€s r'"3'�
Use deawtngsroffacilityto�better explain situations�(use;additional pages as: necessary) s llgg'" rr�i?'�
.... ,'sr.: F'ii -!Sc ! N d gu.:_°v. „ E..c- i ,. i, 1, i��,�,:?�4i'.°4 :i«t.�?k134'i!l t, i7.kFaarU3'�4i�`&°gn.. �1, n r, , <� .?�:�b,. <.. r. ;E.v.,ti. rFcr4£�f,€§$41s nix-sd,'a€�iF,�t.l;�.rE;tr ..�rt3�€
dos+r1I �r�'Y
Ni:'J -1, C'r' A'1', �^VL4[n.�o�\ i�.p rTrk7., / OrJQr tv15 Cdvl \ CWeC �6
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: A!) —
3/23/99

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
kNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
&No
M
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
($ No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
PNo
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes )j.No
ltiona , omments'and/orrawmgs A
� d
3/23/99

i
NCDENR
JAM ES 13. HU NT JR.i '
9.c
::.GOVERNOR �.
14
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICI=
DNISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 23, 1998
Mike Miller
3510 Miller Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
Subject: Site Inspection
Miller Farms, Facility #: 80-14
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Miller:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Mlaste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
91 9 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVI LLE, NORTH CA RO LI NA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FA% 704-663-6040
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen (N) Application for Qommon CroQs:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• CornlSorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be -applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
T' half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 ibs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 601bs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount -of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should.be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
pr'6ducer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples.be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Lam,? fk�
D. Rex Gleason, P. E. j
�1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Lincoln SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Irene, Mike and Robert Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
Dear Irene, Mike and Robert Miller:
&fflWA
0•
A71
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 12, 1998
N.Q Dr.1� r. Carr
OCT 1 a 1998
o[VISIon "s ENVIpaagl
V �'.'MMtf KsUNAL URI
Subject: Special Agreement
Facility Number: 80-14
Miller Farm
Rowan County
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Agreement approved by the
Environmental Management Commission.
The terms and conditions of the Special Agreement are in full effect. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley, of our staff, at (919) 733-
5083, extension 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston How r., E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Mooresyille_Regional=0ffice_w me /attachnts
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District w/attachments
Central Files w/attachments
Shannon Langley w/original attachment
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
L
COUNTY OF ROWAN
IN THE MATTER OF )
IRENE H, MIKE, ROBERT MR LER
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBtg S( i
0 199,q
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.)
Special Agreement is entered into by Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller, hereinaffer`refer-tto,to
as "OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an
agency of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred
to as the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by December 31, 1998.

Farm Number: 80-14
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms.of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

` Farm Number: 80-14
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Miller Farm
PrintNameof Owner
Date Y Z
Signature of Owner
For the North Caroli a Environmental Management Commission:
Date
,^.Chairman of the o missio

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
M P, D
4 0 0 IFA 0011% OOM% avow PrAA
A74�)
Ad M
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANp NATURAL RESOURCES
PM umwr. or
M E NI O R A N D U M -- �c�r+u�.;vE•. �s��>ra.
W.C. MIPT (V @ NATURAL RV.'_quUR(_, 8
MWIRC}NAdT$,N'z, HZk1,
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor MAO Q 1998
5
FROM: Shannon Langley MAR 6 1998 141=1 of EIVIW+0114
PUt;�tr
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement PW
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number
Any comments that the regional office can provide on the issuance of a special agreement to this
facility by the EMC would be greatly appreciated. Please provide any comments in writing (e-
mail messages are acceptable) to me as soon as possible.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
q 5
401 , ,?
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity AftSrmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORiMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
q
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): 1 # I� i ��1 ��
2. Facility No.:
3. Facility Name: 0 Uk ke C Fat, r ms
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
J�oF
5. Mailing Address:
City: y t iS6Q1 V Stater C Zip: L
Telephone No.: (-�dq)
6. County where facility is located: i"i01.��rs
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle):
S. Application Date:
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal'waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
Iona as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office.or yvho can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
MAR 0 2 998 n, 1

I
ti
2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
Waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and got retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
FnRNI SPAG 1/98 Page 2 of 4

4
-� cry o� �,�C�a� aC, ���� ate' ��-a11�►r-.� ��� ���oM s�y� - .
�11?.`�{'.l� `51'•\�;'�� r1�Y�a .�� �p�\.1� Z�1J\ �1.1 �����1 \M�� i
v��c•:j,, _ z•�j'j1 �ti�1-�-n��� ,,,. � 5�r��`r oM �• � �'�1 �-rti.v, zr� ��r�
i lIVA
;
�� ti , 1 � .- � �-, r.�.+`c cam' ^l� ?I`~�V\ 7 �.7� J�`�,p-] -_- � �('•�- --- `!,

r
II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Applicant's Certification:
I, 4,�1✓� t"r�'�Il� f , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all required parts of this application are not complete_ d and if all
re uired supporting information and attachment5 are not included this application acka a will
this document removes my resi2on5ibilitx and liability for complying with all North Carolina
General Statute:, and Re.ulations. I understand that the failure to meet any dates that a[,e agreed
u on by myself and the EMC will result ' a r riate enforcement actions beina, taken y the
ENIC.
M, le r
Print Name of Owner
L4Z f I Date f
Signature of Owner
FORM SPAG 1/98
Page 3 of 4

i
I. cauired Items_
One (1) original and two (2) copies gf the completed and appropriately executed
agplication form, along with any attachments.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
FORM SPAG 1/98
Page 4 of 4

` State of North Carolina
.- Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Qualityloom
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary NCDENR
A. Preston Howard; Jr., P.E., Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 11 1998 �'►Fvrec',•4 ; _�'�
CERTIFIED MAIL'`"
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED SEA 18 1998
Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury NC, 28147
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Miller Farm
Facility Number: 80-14
Rowan County
Dear Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller:
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for
Special Agreement which was received on March 2, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with Irene H, Mike,
Robert Miller in order to allow additional time for Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller to obtain and
implement a certified animal waste management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the -proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14) '
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates
and conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal
penalties, injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535- Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

u Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. .
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 581 or Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
v
Attachment
cc:Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
MRO Regional Office
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF ROWAN
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 80-14
IRENE H, MIKE, ROBERT MILLER
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller, hereinafter referred to
as "OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an
agency of the State of North Carolina created by.G.S.-143B-282, and hereinafter referred.
to as the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 211.0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with I5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission asset forth in G.S. Chapter .I43,_Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a i
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or 'relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discha_ rges•of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph_ 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following: ;
F
h
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified_
animal waste management plan by December 31, 1998.

Farm Number: 80-14
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a'statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of -
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall.not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties; or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 80-14
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Miller Farm
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

_�-b fiu
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 13, 1998
Mike Miller
3510 Miller Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Miller Farms, Facility #: 80-14
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Miller:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on May
12, 1998. It was noted that the waste in the storage pond was encroaching on the
maximum allowed level and should be pumped soon. Regarding your discussion with Mr.
Johnson concerning waste applications, guidelines stipulate that applications be made to
an actively growing crop or within 30 days of planting. During times when it may be
difficult to apply to your fields, you may enter into an agreement with other land owners to
allow waste applications to their fields. Be reminded, that all fields used for waste
applications must be included in the waste utilization plan.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone],
Sincerely,
Z?, RV
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rowan SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28t 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFI RMATIvE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

a
Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Wivision of Water Quality
tic O Como taint ' O Follow-u o 'of DWO ins ecti
Facility Number
registered [3 Certified. [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted
Farm Name:............ /1..4 r...........~
Owner Name : ............. r t.1-7C ..,......... �. i..1 a . ...............................
Follow-up of DSWC review O Other �
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ; Qp 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Not Operational .1
�Da`te Last Operated: ..........................
County: ............ `5�............0................................
PhoneNo: ..............................................................................
Facility Contact: ...................................... .... Title Phone No.
MailingAddress:., 15..1.............d ............................................... ... i { !.......................................... Z.V1.n...
OnsiteRepresentative:........ i�, .d?:�, ....... ............................... Integrator: ....... ..............................................................................
Certified Operator ...... ... .......... .................................... Operator Certification Number,—O.Awl"o-714"t.
-.7 2 4A ^7
Location of Farm;
:..f�r[r....rn... .....� .:........a i ................ �'............ ............. lM Cl, ......... ........ ...! .....hS (,l4l�t
...�.�,........i��.,.....fArt.x.. �.rt.......�.i�.......�3-...�5............... r.--a.ex&,...... Q.n.......L�... ..................................................................... w
Latitude �• 3Li �C - �� Longitude
` Design ,Current Design Current
Capaciky ;Populatioq <Paultry Capacity ,Population Cattle
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
6
2v0
a
Number of Lagoons / Holdrng'.Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 1EISprayField Area
a .Yx ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes jtS No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes kNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes two
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes WO
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonslholding ponds) require ❑ Yes � No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 1!�No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes C�No
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
WNo
Structures (LaLoons,Hnlding Ponds,, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
X,No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 0
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):................. 1........._..................................................................................................................................................
....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
No
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
`� No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
KNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'?
❑ Yes
116No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
121 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, otify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......t�L7.irYl....., ts....,7r/1.....C,J.G�.......................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ wit those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
24-Nlo '
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
;&No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
91 No
t9. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
9Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
,❑ Yes
IkNo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[ZNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
FRNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Cl Yes
R.,No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
,ZNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
M,)Vo
3 No.violations or de' iciencie's.wer'enoted-during this visit.- .Yo'U.W'ill receive no further
correspondence about this. visit.-:
mer.rarnrr�
I Userawings of facility to better;'explatn sttuatu n5 (use addttional pages as necessa
A b 'ZO 7 - ":5-
Ax., Pot It, �
S �atrn�� �nd� �re.c�s ?� he.. �.,.��e� soo►1 .
SC ra P J A dq, � i'
7125/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� �� __ Date:

a# _.-�,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Dear Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANp NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
iv.c- new r. o
NA1 tJt:AL Rk3()UpCryy
FEB zs 1998
MW3188 OF f"'oYMM41 i'AVfz,`iillr
"aa,1`4'11t RHML OFFICE
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Miller Farm
Facility Number: 80-14
Rowan County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.E(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a -special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/l0% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established inl5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 214.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforeement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 5, 1998
Mike Miller
3510 Miller Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
Subject: Operator -in -Charge Certification
NCGS 90A-47.2
Miller Farms, Facility #: 80-14
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Miller:
As of January 1, 1998 all facilities must have a certified Operator -In -Charge. A review of
the database does not show this to be the case for your facility. Failure to have a Certified Operator -
in -Charge is a violation ofNCGS 90A-47.2.
If you or the designated operator for the facility have not taken and passed the required exam,
an interim certified operator should be obtained. If you have already taken the exam, you may want
to contact Ms. Cindy Dudley of the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification
Commision (WPCSOCC) at 919-733-0026.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Rowan SWCD
Regional Coordinator
AJ
SincereIy,
D. Rex GIeason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
AW C
919 North Mcfn Street, N4 FAX [phone]C340
Mooresville, North Carc;ina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 7C4-663-16y9 5C°ro recycled/ 1Cro post -consumer paper

two mAS3 of j
A6 L 1 NRV
AO lag(l
L
tep/l Plu
JIV -Y7
ep, S-or ?
COS
unSUy�

,t
• State of North Carolina
r Department of Environment,
~� Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mike Miller
3510 Miller Rd.
Salisbury, NC 2&W
[44
Dear Mr. Miller:
A14
000MM% � .90 0 MY - �
1:�EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 5, 1997
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
15A NCAC 2H .0217
Miller Dairy Farm, Facility #: 80-14
Rowan County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on April 30, 1997 by Mr.
Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are
indicated in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
Mr. Johnson had hoped someone would be available during the inspection. He delayed the inspection
for approximately 20 minutes after the arranged time of 3:00 p.m. before doing a limited inspection of
the facility. Mr. Johnson observed a discharge from what appeared to be the milking parlor into a ditch
which flowed into a wooded area. Surface water runoff from the paved lot also emptied into the
ditch. These discharges are a violation of the deemed permitted status pursuant to North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.1 (a) and Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC 2H .0217.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by May 21, 1997 indicating the
actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address your response to Mr. Johnson.
For technical assistance, please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
representative.
Please Be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day
per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. If
you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
P.O. Box 29535, Xwc
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] ; ., , 50% recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mike Miller
Page 2 .
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or
me at [phone]. `
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Acting Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell County Soil & Water Conservation District
Compliance/Enforcement File
AJ

k DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
;,
WQ'AnimaI Feedlot Operation
Site Inspection
fi
10f9o'utine O Complaint O Follow-up of DNVQ inspection
O Follow -tip of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 3
Facility Number v
`
Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: _..ia. ....
Total Time (in hours)Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
FarmName: _.... ti, :gw............ rSM............ ......... ».......
__.... _..... County:.....» ���i�....».... »_...__.... �.......
Owner Name:._ .._�.rG ��. ..». s� �1. �'r .. _ . ».» »._...
» .�.. ...». Phone No:.=-2- — 2 7 ... �. .....�
Mailing Address:._a.57.�
Onsite Representative: _..... _...[1�� .....» .... .......... ..
_ .W _..». Integrator: ... ........ .»....» ».. ... .........» ..... ...._ »...»
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: _ .... .. ....... ..... ..... .........
_...,
Location of Farm:
to ► L_. , :tr» c�+�... .,40 ..15 .. ... 5. .... »_...._ 4
Latitude Longitude �• �� ���
(] Not Operational Date Last Operated:........ _. ... ..
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Swine .Number
`Feeder
Poultry Number
;Number °R
..Z
g a_Cattte
M
❑ Wean to
y
[� La er
a cep
y
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Nan -La er
`
❑Beef
s
Farrow to Wean
a
A
Feeder;,..
Farrow to
?..V.
Farrow to Finish
;, ❑yOther Type of Livestock
h � #
«Number. of Lagoons /Holding Ponds
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area FoSpray Field Area
General see COw YVJ ,!�-ti r
1. Are there any buffcrs that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes' ONO
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? KYes ❑ No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [:]No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? krYes ❑ No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 14 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on.back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after I/l/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Iloldini_Ponds) ;� !/ $ �G- Cdmu/t zl AIT S
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon I Lagoon-2 La_oon 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the strictures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste ARRE&ation A//�
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
IS. Crop type _..- r ....._.... _.......... ...... �....._._ . ..... _ .. _..._.....
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? AioHe_ o65-e_ru-eA
For Certified Facilities Only /10/
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. -Does-facility require-a-foilow=up-visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes No
1 ❑ No
❑ es ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑.No
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes--❑
No____
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments (refer to questi6n Explain any YES saets and/or any recommendations or any other m coments
CTse drawings offacility to Better,explain'situations (use; additional pages as,neccssary)
4r% O_V rc►r'_� C-V/%-t ,T v" 0-% VVIV0.IL �-v e_ . 0"" 'e,�
4
-�al ,
-de--de- ; n
�o stye , 5� ec_)�r �a ,, Ct boJ Z.c� ,,z �,t , e5 6.e- �o� lv- e4no
{{
AI i V. i k � 1, , * e C cn W $ Ve-u� C. �w. wkAa�- n f1> e-D cr eko
iMi��c�,t
LJ1CO 0--"QC�-. 5cJ``�i(ll Gt4 l Y'L�.vt0F� TrC 1,11 1 x1s & Q4-e4 0'150
pepC7-
t�
S"AaL� `��vt0`4 �. w,_Ae. Loo - ;-Low-e&
v�N� e.c e�.r tn� ah olc� 10� o4n `rtr� o...�v,.e_r
•i-o c arv�iG� `�� Na � � R eg �• rc e- Cm.-•s
����� . ������� a � 'E-1.t•� w�s�-Q- vtna,nc4 e..t�-� s � �c� eo-h b� p e�r�a �-w.e� .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
.4
cc. urvinon of parer Quaruy, rrorer L1rrarrry.5ecrron, racrrrry.assessmenr Unit i alwyo

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Mike Miller
3510 Miller Rd.!
Salisbury, NC 28147
Dear Mr. Miller:
J;i& ( ,r
All*�
[DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 2, 1997
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
15A NCAC 2H .0217
Miller Dairy Farm, Facility #: 80-14
Rowan County, NC
This is the second notice of violation regarding your dairy. The previous notice was mailed
on May 5, 1997. However, the return receipt verifying your acceptance of the letter has not been
received by this Office. To ensure proper handling, Mr. Johnson verified the mailing address with
Mrs. Irene Miller.
Enclosed is the copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on April 30,
1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or
deficiencies are indicated in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as
soon as possible.
Mr. Johnson had hoped someone would be available during the inspection. He delayed the
inspection for approximately 20 minutes after the arranged time of 3:00 p.m. before doing a limited
inspection of the facility. Mr. Johnson observed a discharge from what appeared to be the milking
parlor into a ditch which flowed into a wooded area. Surface water runoff from the paved lot also
emptied into the ditch. These discharges are a violation of the deemed permitted status pursuant
to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (a) and Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC
2H .0217.
o.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by June 18, 1997 indicating the
actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address your response to Mr. Johnson.
919 North Main Street, ��10C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 17l 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
L,

l
Mike Miller
Page 2
Be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and
regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Acting Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell County Soil & Water Conservation District
Compliance/Enforcement File
AJ

4
IS Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p o ow -up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number ���
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: Registered lull I
Farm Name: Miller.Yarm................
Owner Name: 1rene.H,2ffilie,.$obert... Miller ...................
Mailing Address: 351I1.Miiler..Rd.......................
Onsite Representative: MIA .....................................
........................................ County: Rowan MRO
Phone No: 7Q4-851:98,97.........................
Saiisbary..1� C....................................................... 281.47
.........................
.......... Integrator:.....................................................................
Certified Operator: .................................................. ................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
IV
Latitude ©s®& ®u Longitude
pof erational Date Last Operated:............................................................................................................................................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
® Yes p No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
I gal
p Yes 11 No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
© Yes ® No
Continued on back

8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
[]Yes
❑ No
Structures goons and/or Holding.Pondsl
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
Lagoon 4
..............NIA............... ...................................... ..............................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
p No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
p No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
[]Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type...........................)11*13 Mm................................................................................ ..................... .
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
p Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For CgriffiedFOcjJjjie5 On)
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
❑ No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Flan in any way?
❑ Yes
p No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
p Yes
❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Fac(lWAssessment Unit
Date:' G' I
11/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mike Miller
3510 Miller Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
Dear Mr. Miller:
[7EHNFR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Miller Farms, Facility #: 80-14
Rowan County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
AW919 North Main Street, -W * FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 rfr An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/100,o post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others.
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
PIease note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Rowan SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
01
Sincerely,
D. x )Qwn,-��
Water Quality gional Supervisor

State of North Carolina
WA
Department of Environment, IT4
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor � � H N
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
N.C. DEPT. OF
IreneHMiller FNVIRONNIRNT, t3EALTH,
Miller Farm & NATURAL 1.i,S:)1,.,CES
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury NC 28147 DfC 17 1996
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Miller Farm DIVI51011 OF ENVIOONMENTAt NAIIAGE6lENT
Facility ID #: 80-42 NOORESKLE REGIGNAE OFFICE
Rowan County
Dear Ms. Miller:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC), The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, I997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996,
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
l�t'ze'f'z'-�
FOR Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water. pollution Control System I 1W '10 '`f Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission �� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 _ 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North _Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
Miller Farms
3510 Mills Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Dear Farm Owner:
XTIMWA
[DaHNFZ
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Miller Farms
Facility ID #: 80- I4
Rowan County
N.C. DEPT. OF
ENVI.12O.N,NffrN'.1', HrAi.TH.
& NATURAL R_S()U, (-"gs
DEC 12 1996
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL 14ANAGE;NENT
ROGRESVILE REGIONAL OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
let, ,
R
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System ��`
NVf
V"' W, Voice 919-733-0026 FAX 919-733-] 338
Operators Certification Commission C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Actlon Employer
P.O, Box 29535 Ralelgh, NC 27626-0535 50` . recycled/10% post -consumer paper

If any parts, requirements, or limitatio s contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional informagon concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
..� Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
RowanCounty Health Department
Mooresville -Regional• Off ice, Wa er Quality -Section
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files
0
NC DEPT. OF EkV RONMejoT',
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
.xE
G -
MAY 1 4 2002
4'
J

F `NArE
�O 9p Michael F. Easley, Governor
0 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O 'C Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
May 6, 2002
Robert Miller
Miller Farm
3510 Miller Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800014
Miller Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
Dear Robert Miller:
In accordance with your application received on September 5, 2000, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Irene H, Mike, Robert Miller, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG200000. This -approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from the Miller Farm Farm, located in Rowan County, with
an animal capacity of no greater than 200 Dairy and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this-COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP-may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Internet httpl/h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
DENR Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer

A
State of North Carolina
1.
2.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
.Division of Water Quality RECEIVED
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) S EP z 2000
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations._,
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Miller Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Irene H, Mike. Robert Miller
1.3 Mailing address: 3510 Miller Rd
City, State: Salisbury NC Zip: 28147
Telephone Number (include area code): 704-857-9887
1.4 County where facility is located:
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Hwv 150. On (SR 1535) Weaver Rd. on right off of
Miller Rd (SR 1509).
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1:8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation:
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 80_ (county number); 14 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Cattle operation
Dairy
200- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; F7no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type -of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer ))(Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 80 - 14

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 250 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP):
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or O (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES o NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Actavor
dards, etc.) (Swine Only)
NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CA WMP for permitting purposes:
3.3. t The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.'
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUr.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 80 - 14

Facility Number: 80 - 14
Facility Name: Miller Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
1,
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for _ 6 U — 1 `1 fi ri( Win _ to r rrt.5 _._ _-_(Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to we as incomplete. _ ./ .
Signature
Date 7/15-/ 00
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
.application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE N M13ER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 80 -14

Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number Facility Name ' ' t I I -e
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for UU Date of Certification
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system. is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Milking
Dry cows ... _
Heifers
Calves
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders -
Stockers
TOTAL CONFINED ANIMALS**
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate.
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
Amended Certification (only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified):
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated far
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number).
Farm owner/applicant
Signature
Farm manager (if applicable)
Signature
Technical Specialist
Signature
Phone Number (
Date
Date
Date

i
Animal Waste Management Plan Certification ou l y
does not re❑uire a
General Information:
Name of Farm: rr{ ; Ig rs r M Facility No: So --
Owner(s) Name:_ .1�- M , i i t r Phone No:
Mailing Address:_ 1_ d_ h't f 2y— . �E<<.ti; �..a rJ t �q 147
Farm Location: _ County Farm is located in:
Latitude and Longitude: / Integrator:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.):
Operation Descriotion:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
II Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
• Farrow to Wean
G Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
U Gilts
Boars
Type of Poultry
❑ Layer
❑ Pullets
No. of Animals
Type of Cattle
Dairy
0 Beef
No. of Animals
Other Type of Livestock:� Number wIs:
Acreage Available for Application: Required Acreage:
Number of Lagoons /Storage Ponds : Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft.�)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner /-Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and, Water Conservation District. I (we) kaow that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to ' the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 50 days of a title transfer.
,Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC -- August 1, 1997
Date:

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the - -
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A' NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
A} Collection. Storage. Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
❑ Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
❑ New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land_ Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address. (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
❑ Facility without exterior Iots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
❑ Facility with exterior lots (RC) -
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): _ Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 2

S 1.
D). Application and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriate box
❑ Existing -pi expanding ,facility with existing waste ant lication equipment (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
❑ New. expanded. or existing facility without existing waste application equipment-for_smy 'rdaatiQn (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Q New. ;5panded.�gr exi$ ng facility without -existing waste app 'cation -tquinment for Ian spreading_not using,
spiv irriLation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Worm Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. Mortality Management and Emergencv Action Plan (SD.
SI. WUP. RC or
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation . Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner): ^_
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facile (Si)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site ('WUP)
Check the appropriate box
❑ The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal ;waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specked in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 34 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan,
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
'Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have beerHnstalled as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Anitlication and Handling Equipment Installation (WUP or 1)
Check the appropriate block
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
J Animal waste application and handling equipment specified. in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified iri
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan-
Q Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Prin
Affiliation.c�i^�►ti��11PrPn/f
Address (A
Work Completed:
No.:—IJL —77d
The following 4ign_at&e block is only,,fo be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (wd) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to subnut this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner: M ; I I ,r- ' ;I, ,,, L : ,. Id 4 Por44ror <k';
Date: f 2ly/ a �
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD, SI. WUP. RC or 1)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature:. _ _ _ Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997
5

Animal Waste N'fanagement Plan Certification gQ-1
rPlease tvpe or orint all intorm:ltiOn that Noes noc require a si_.^.:iturLi
FrYistin� or'.-Nietiv -or' `` Expanded (please circle one)
General Information:
Na-me of Farm: F :lciiity `off_
Owneer(5) Name: Fnbr_ t M,i 1.1 Pr _ =;none o: z g5-; 9
MaiiinQ a i&ess: 35ig Miller Rd
Farm Locarian: i ...;•mod in: ranwa f
China Grove, NC C4LriC: Ft1r;n is c..t...�.. �•. � F" •1
L?EitlLde and Lanvti Cam: 3i _ 45— LB.lL 36 _ o- �I el-.2:Or:
Please auat:n a cor y 4 a %V'' t 3Ci(} dz: iI S-': ' :C%
;�_ , et cotnl. rest_ m p 1Li lc:! n i t i,.a and c.e �-icz �z t. lBz"s�z.�t�.�::.Ta;1c�
names. d:re_.Wns. Mi'epost. e c.): mi west of (hj nA-,-Qrnve on N 1 S2 . Nam. 2% _rin
Mi.1.ler R-d-- to Weaver- -,Rd . ZLB mi- W, on weaver Rd - On i tT.nr-a fip_d nn
Oneration Descric)don:
Type of Swire No. o.:Animeis
`t Wear, to
�t -,e-der t0 . finish
�' , =7o%v to Wean
arrow to .
Farro- to finish
Gilts
Hoa.
Yi Lay-,:
.
?uiles
Orher Tvoe ?! Ld: e::CcI�': VIIIIIl:er C.f J:fl1tC:S:
E persdsnY- Oper cars Orsly
P e ioirs Des:�r.'Ca�C-:r: r�(1Cc[fiOrQ,' Drsitr C1' C.CI: To t Z)CSi.t1"e�.iQC n'��,..,
- _.
AcreaQt: Availabie for Apoi;c:aLion: I�� Required Acrraae
`'umber of I aRuons 1 S.tCrage ?Dods � Total cacacit}:_Lin, a3(o C c:c
Are subsur=c= drains cresenc on the [arm: DES or (plea: c c:e on")
Lf YES. are subsurface drains present in tie area or the LAGOO. or SPRkY FIELD (pit^se c;rc'.e one-!
.1xxxRRarR RRY RR%..�x%T.RR%%YRxxvx..RRx%R RRRRs.Rr+R%a.Ra.s..Rx%a. a.xxwx--------%..
Owner / Manager A,reernent
I (%ve) verifv tliat all the above infcrmation is carve t nild '.rill be upiate•+ ucun than -.in.,. I i-ve-> understand the ocerac;Cn
and maincd.narce prccedures established in the- aceroved animal waste nz• nageztent plan :or the farm narie:i abode and %vi:l
implement these orac:dures. I (we) LnOw that anv expansion to the e:6stin-2 design caoscity of the waste treatment and
storaJe sVscem or constracriun of new facilities will require a new cer, ilcadun to be subriitted to the Divi:ion or
nvirunmentnl %lariast:tnent before the ne:v z^.im:Is are sw6-.—d. I (cue-) underst:md that there must be no disc:tarsze of
animal waste from the storage or aaplicaaon system to sumac: waters of the- state e:titer direccl•r through a man-aindd
conve�:ance or from a store e�sent less Severe than the ?S-vear. 24-hour storm and these must not be run-,)f t.3m ease
avplic_dun of animal waste. I (eve) understand iliac run-off of pullu=ts from loun?inQ and heavv use areas must be
minimized usinq technical standards deve'.uee•' by Ua e Natural Resources Conservation Se: -rice. Thz agpruved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the- local Soil and Wace: Cunser'ra6on District. I (wd) know that and• mcdifiicadon
roust be aeproved by a technical scecialisc and submitted to LLe- Soil and Wacer Conservation Disuic: prior to
irnolernenLaLion. A cbanse in [and ownership requires written noar:caciun to DENI or a ne,v cerjticarion (ir tie aepruve-d
plan is changed) within EO days of a tide Lransrer.
Name of Land Owner :
Signature:
dame of ti(ana�er;ir t lie:eat ir�m ilk':':
Si�natt.tre:
Date:
Date:
AWC -- August 1. 199

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the: N'crcfi Carolina Soil and Water Curve: •atiun ConMMsiun pursuant to I: a,
`CAC tit= .CGOJ�. I ce tisv that Lire animal waste management syste n Ct)r the fare named _cute his an animal %%-cJRz
manag=enc plant that meets or exceeds standards and sce_ificaliuns of Lhe Division of Ea:ironmenm[ Manage:;:ent
(DEti[) as specified in .15A `CAC 2H.42[ 7 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conser at[un Sc :lie (-MCS) and -for ut
`ortb Carolina Soil and W'ate; Conservation ComtniSSion pursuant to 15A `'CAC ? Z17 =d I-4A .N'CAC 6 .0001_
.0005. The following e!e:nents are included in the plan as applicable. While each categur. designates a tec^:nicai specialist
'.lino may sign each cer,lflcatlon (SD. Si. WIUT, RC. I). tie tec :nical specialist should onl;., parts for hicl, Lie; arrz
II. Certification of Desi,; n
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Svstem
Che,::: irhe apprdnrrare box
Exisifng facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Scorn,'e volume is adequate for operation carscity: stora re cnpunilit;: c„r._i.;,e.^.c •.vitll waste utilization
requirements.
_.' \ew. exnanded or re:rofiued falc;lft`1 (SD)
Animal wa_;tc StUrage anti treatment structures. suCh as but riot limited Lo uollec:ian s._re^:;. last:t)�ts am.1 runtls.
have bean designed to aitet or exceed the minimum standarts and scecit:4atiuns.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):�,� ram-y Ct� iQ FyL
aftiiiation_UsDCSI_ `s5 _ --Dace Wor:c Comcl;.arnri.
Redress 7 27-C_ O l D CoNcoeQ 2-p S i*z Lur Phone c..+._7°`t 4P37-1(p oq
Signature: g,4r,— _ Dace: /-7- 97S
B) Land Armlication Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buifers); adequate amount of land for n-,tie utiiizadcn: chosen c:Up is
suitable for waste managemenc hvdraulic and nutrient loading- rates.
:Name of Technical Specialist (Please P:int):7 • :Br`• ueE R t D:5
cwfilia:ion ()5 D A — N GCS Date Wort Comaieted: /-(o-9a
z7ZZ7-C 01D Coie�naIa — — 7a4_
address (�.gen ,; ): S (;�J, 609- C_ Z -4 Phone N o.: (o37-
S 1%* shire: A,(z, Dace: _I- 7- 97 '� -
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots.
Check the anprcpriare box
_D F-acility without exterior lets (SD or WUP or RQ
This facility dces not contain any exterior lots.
7s Futility wich exterior lots (RC)
`[ethotls to minimize the run off at pOilutanLs frost lounging anti heavy use arejs hart been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by "c Cs.
dame of Technical Specialist (Please
.-.iIii'ation (1 D Date «'t7r'.: C.)mt)lzred:.1 / of 4S
Z.7Z-7-C— O t 704
�dtir_ss (a.�?nc•Y) S b tz z P"cane No.. _(,37-f(o0q
a«-C -- Au._,Lt 1. 1997 ,

D).Aaolication and Handlin_4 Eauinment
Chen: the a.opropricte hox
—.� E::ictin9 or t^g it': with e:. is[ing tyac[e noClicl(intl _T:11210nlC'tt (W UP or D
Animal waste aepiicaLiun tcu[pme:ic in the plan has been e;L1Cr tie!d caiibrated or e':alttaL,,.d
accordant.- with ezistin,2 desi4n c :arts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessar: to accommcdate L
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the ol: 1 aL —a[, rot to
esceed eithrr Lhe soecitied hvdraulic or nutrient loading rates. a scheduie for Liming of apeiicaftns has been
es[ablishe•1: required buffers can be aza_incained and caiibradon and adjusLment gui =ce =-z c-:nLrir:ed ;s part of
Lhe plan).
`r: . �::�e;tndetl. or e.'Siicing tacflity wiO..on( wa,;[e aV21iclttnn egiitrnnert for t r'y im'an lean. (1)
Animai waste application equipment sce'_;Fled in ct:e plan has beet designed to acoiv :vas[e as nectssar: to
accommcuace the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by Lhe
plan at rates not to exc_ed eidier the sctcit:ed `lyuraulic or nutrient loading rates. a 5c.hedule far ti.nti ,nz of
applications has be_n es=blished: required buffers can be maintained: caiibri[iun and ad usznent ?uid^,r.c! ze
contained as part of de Clan).
_:, tiz:v. e, -vnnded! nr e:-ktln? rnc'liy- ::'iLl1N+[ e.':i�ztin4 wave wrlicnrion etuir nt.m (or 'art! < f"atlln? Re'.t 11Sirt,,
:rrn ire tit,n. (W[;P or l)
Aninial waste application equipment sce:iticd in dad plan has been seiecte'F to apply waste as ne.ess:,rr: to
accommodate Lhe waste management pull: (proposed appiicauon equipment can cover the area required by L°:_
pf,i at :ales nOL LO eCCe_d ei[her the SLCCi[ied 5.:draullC or nilLrit'1( load"ng r-,es: a :che''u:_ rQr Lr. M12 at
aoolicaLiens has been established: required buffers can be maintained: caiibrauun and a,.:iust.* teat _-u;eznce are
contained as par, of the pian). Name of Te_chnical Specialist (Ple n sz Pant): !v t-��
aft`tliationr,ytp:4$il.t'/r�ate Work Comeie:ed:
Address (!'agent: I: -QL_a ,� � C: -M2P! one `o. � �L—��6� /�cA2
Signature Date:
E) Odor Con
ntrol. Mortality
ncv .action Plan (SD.
SI. WLiP. RC or Il
The waste management -!an for this facility inc!udes a Waste k1anase-nent Odor Cunuci ChecUisL an 1nseC;
Control Chec!:lisL a Momalicy :N-Ianage-nenc Chec:clisi and an E nersr:ic;: Ac:iun Plan. Sources of bath cdors and
insecu have been eyalua[ed wiLh respeu; to this site and Best Management Practices to `fininlize Odors a.rd Best
%ianaee.me iL PrtcL ces co Control Insets have been selec%d and inc!uded in ch.- waste mznzge:nent plan. Soch Lhe
�foralicv tilanagement P'.an and the -mergenc•: action Plan are comaiem and can be imcieuie:ued by this facility.
\acne of Technical Specialist (Please P:inr):-7" 7, ir.3 EL2_
. L'Y'Lliarion U _10L\- s Dair- Wort Comple:e 1- Lai 9
AL'&ess (anent•, ): �S fit I n lD a N r Z ! 4 Phone Nolea'4P37- I (ooq
Si, -mature: e . Dare: 1— 7-99
F) Written Notice of Pew or Eadandin! Swine Farm
The foilov ing signature block is o v to be used For new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after dune
21. 1996: If the facility was built be0ha June 21. 1996, when wns it constructed or last
expanded
I («e) c_: ify that I (eye) have aue zcted to co c; by ce utted (nail ail adjoining p, ee ;;: o'L-ne s and ail procz:�y owRe:s
who o1wn property located across a public road. s �eL or highway from this new or-=anuing swine farm. The norcc was
in comoliance witb Lh. rcquiremeriu of NCOS Leo- s. A copy of the notice and a list of Lae proeeny owners nouf[ed is
attached,
Name of Land Owner:
Si -nature:
_ti'ame of l lana_e.* :f ; i[ter�ZL :rout uvne:
4-
Date:
Si,na,ture: Date:
AWC -- AuL1$C 1. 19973

III. Certification of Installation
a) Collection_ Storage. Treatment Insrallation
ti'e.. ee anded rr rerroCiue tat ilit� (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have beet installed
in accordance with the approved plan to mee: or escted tee minimum startdartis and Specifications.
For etisdn, facilities withouc rerroftts, no certifcanon is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
(filiation Date Work Corsaleled-
Address (A?_acv):
Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Aooligdon Site (NVL:P)
Check the rtnpropricue Gar
,Td The crooning system is in puce on all land as sue::ified in the animal waste management plan.
—1 Conditional :approval: ail required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting: the cropping SVSLe n
as specified in the waste uti'.izadon 01 n has not becz established and the own_r has committed to establish ere
veze:ation as spec?fled in the plan by (monthidaviye:r): the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilizadon plan.
Zi Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping syste:n as specified in the plan can not be established on nC .vlv c'.eared land within ;0 da,: s
of this ce tification. the owner has committed to establish an interim crop tar erosion control:
Name of Technical Specialist (P!z; rz P::r:t):_ ._�"}�_c�GJ- _~�_t QS2-
Attiliazicn VSD NP- Date 1NVur Completed:
Address (A�ncy)zS AC_t �"DCoNc� Phone \o.: 37-
Signature:
Date: 1- 7- 9 g
This follo..•ing signature blocs: is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that 1 (we) bave committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) wad ze utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit to DELI a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 1: 4:21endax days following the date specified in the condidonal certification. I (wc)
realize that failure to subtnit this vrrif Canon is a violation of site waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
eatorcenteac action from DELI.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
-Name of Manager (if differe:lt from owne ):
Signature:
Date:
Date:
AWC -- Awgust 1. 194)'

Q Runoff Cnntrois.from _Exterior Lots (RC)
Fscihy/ with emerior iou
1,1,!`i ds to minimize die run off of pollutants "runi lounging and licnvy use _ea; huv,- �Crn in:tall-j as iLe.zirj,j
in the clan.
For facYicies wirhotrf exterior !ots. no cerfificadon is necessar_:.
Name of Technical Specialist (F!ease Print): tZ . l �v6- E i DG 2
.atfiiiation CJf:, D A_ - 4 a C S Date Wor - C::nciered: S - ! 1-9 g
AL4&1s; (:�v3;t ):Z7 7-s o� k) � Z� °^one `o � �37-11004
Sitltlture: Dar--
D) ADolication and Handling, Eouiomen_,_Installation (NVIUP or I)
Cafe: � the appropriate bloc. ^
.animal waste a_oiieadon and handling ecuipment :r Cc:[IC1 in the Sian is t::: site and ready for use.
cadbraLion and _djustrrtent mate.-^'als have ' e_n provide.: to die 0 -ners =J are curtained -is Pan of die piar:.
-1 =.nirilal •.taste application and handling euuiCntent speriled in t:!,: plan not *C=:I lnst:illed but Laid OtyP.Cr
has procured leasing or third part;: apclic:r;on and h :Li provided a aline: convac:: euuipnient srecuied in
the contract agrees dvidi Elie rcuuir-,menu of the plan: re•suired buffers can be anaint hie-4: cafilor-Won and
adiusL ienc !vjid:ncc have begin provided 10 21 c O•A'ners and a! ccni ,ned as part O llz Clan..
Conditional approval: Animal waste application and liLmd!ing e:suipment icecttted in die plan has
been purcha_zed and will be on site and installed by (montthhL-:fd-ear): there is adequatc
stcra,e to bold the waste until the couiemerc is installed and ur.di the •-yaste can be land apciicil in
accordance with the cmouin; systam contained in the clan: and calibration and ad ustment gutdanc_ rave
been provided to the owners and are contained as of the plan._
,Name of Technical Specialist (P!ease P1, 0:_ % �c'� _ �- . x:; _��'.
Aff=i:atianrJs�,. s�'� `r,, �L ate `N or
=,ddress (Agency): r�l ���% Pone `0.1. 7 ��. 7�Y -,) 1
Si� 12tt!re: / c Date:
The follo%vin: siarfature b of ck is only to be ured when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have commirzd to purchase the- ahimJ, waste acpiicat on ar.0 handling equipment as
5 ec:t!e 1 in my (our) ryas,-. management plan and will submit to DENI a ven ica6on of dal,liver-: and insmilatiCn
Forst a Technical Specialist w• Lain !; caltndor days following ihte d'.ate specified in aie conditional ce:tirieatien. I
(We) realize ,liar fiiure to submit this ve:;fic_tion is a •rioiation or rare waste manav?mint Ciatt and will subiec: rn e
(us) to an enr.orcement action From DENL
Name of Lanc_Owner: ('I i
Signature:.
L
Date: a,t
Marne of Manager (if different from owner):
Si;nature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality NInnagement fSD. SI. WUP. RC or I)
Me'nccds to-ccntrol odors and insec'.s as specified in Lhz Plan have been installeLl and are ooeradonal. The
mcrality management sysiem as specified in the Plait has also been instolled and is operational.
.Name of Technical Specialist (Ple•:se fs�sP_
Afi;iiiauo
AL'! r-ess (
Si!ZnL:ture
«'or Comnle:ed:5- l)- 9T
> Phone `'0,7" _b37- 162,41
DarL-: -
AWC -- .august 1. 1997

801
. rtr�� r
1� r 1jo 1n N lftws Barber '9E,\
:.ry .• y .yr. / x - rC _ ;; f(f1J �� 4 f .r a� ,a•, �° 4WBE
>N N:� " � Q ' `c "r�,RANKLIN Pr
an
vJ i rf
as ,r •}, c. �• r ` y y£D*DNO R? i�D°RBRa %! r r 70 e• i ROWAN
f \ O RO $ I•i9 / �41!!f ` S+i �G:rvRcr p�. ❑
aD ri? � ` `a r.: r • � / / ... / ' a r 4+ Irk y5 • ' ,v:�-
'S Salisbury r
•_ E � � ,.. �: =',e:' i_ S� z � �•��, � " � crz 1C FIRE—.r:5
-t r - - -;.: EB �-" � 4 .-}e r2a?r _ vl =:,�_c •C" � A 1
801 / o n •', -. r,,,
a / o
Jac BEAR" QLAR MT. ULL
:3c aD Y i i FIB / T LOCitE FIRE 015 ! J:a'f• k` . Q i�aRJsa,v Ro
;' �� 'Bear �j, r r':_ ,r,� �m ,n, ,: ! �,:,,:�•,
P �` r� aSL h Y ��.T'F S'•r: .?i.D SALZS R.
x, r .. f b .7a li9 •I. ;L
F/ r5o
:g`
Y ci r�•D alE v .:•rr a Dv� :7ff
r? +09 �: V D`a4 C. L C/ AD .775 6 � r.1 �=: 8'•A I % Rowan
M
C p; r ♦< y• .`f• •- :J' "Jr ti�..s,�.`. .rr �.}.,': Mif Is
it r I
C Ulla :dJ s� p: A a r C Ot r, IRIS "S„ 9,v. f�
f : "`" s pp ROWAN Co; r . r.'D r"'� r,L
Q �, C,�,w IS d AIR OPr Rr.' rY
Millbr age :35i., ci?`�` t .rJ /
1550 .. Er7.R2 cy^3N RD R
G � � � � � L a^ '� _ •v„[ :11} �. r=r ay'� serf �i�p'. µ:,. � � S
CO i2 .i
`��r / /• \\P7 r ,,� q•..fvr;3^.' _ate aL
.r, .•6_ \..i a ! !fr}SO ti RD. - fGf , �`� .:.�
CEt N FIRE DIST :i;N%
14,
e �srx W s at / �'f�* •emu �} •�O'9r�' .•+ Skis,
}}! ,..•.�. ? n,�./G^•Y 7}19 aLy' ,•J3 �!1
,}f — �i'}„ :aa a r I♦ ' E, yF~ .s'r
C,raa- JS / c �9 ea r alYf G+ :f a �`Js'l_ V s•�[ '^e. •Ati. 6Di'
y, �� .,sy4 / e1=\•1 y0' ,t4 "'+=.}er ` i.!yJ` _. Rs' ,:J•
JM
o r /' • C i ."q' ram, a° a ..
'f Gus
J I`'2 i, ¢ --•�,• .,_=�IJ •• \ ..� _ A� f i Y[Y Ri 29 ;ram R? :,f, •f. �J ,. -,
�•' V 7r r p'
�Il••
l < }•t I J1: '•d:.!Js \ r ..Y:.Ca. 29 9Y 46a :y-.' -7�� C�Dsf
'JI �IIyyll3 ..i V • P.•-'FAS.TY :ar,� [ J ti .i+V. 'J� `S•
?F�� 152 ;Scl 152y�
ATWELL FIR ,OIST.
153
I ,eY: w• (: i 'l �f1 _ n,.f r�P 13• 1S^.
�.,.
i sof '' �� ' 'r�y'gAc�>ae BOSTI Hl1E1GHT • ' P�F.'
�J EN F DIST. ; PJGf-.I ]
\ e _ y sFaGE r Rp _ •�� S
111 / = `vy0 y r ,s \ lss •Jf6 o- aCGrR
1.11 S}f. , �:14ti,.a,�.3 !j!, y 1_ ` "o e
Enoch -; ' L �J '�°u: x :�: . t .L?2, S 1'_'.JI ,
[. 8
of+4�tirville t QNNf�OLIS^ T,De of
,1G9
I !ri} •r •� .Ikf ,}n q' I \ L- •� L�I -- ` N fpe t 73rp i ��ti 569
01
s 7
1� C
C A' B A R U S
VIN
rONE HOUSE
ORGAti EUTHERAIN
CHURCH
Near Rockwell, so-called because John
Stirewalt made what is thought to be the
first organ in the state, was begun about
1774 but not completed until 1795.
ST. LUKES EPISCOPAL
CHURCH
220 N. Church St. -Salisbury
One of the SotJth's most beautiful small
churches. The Parish was established by
act of Colonial Assembly in 1753. The nave
o.orted in 1R)Q

RD. 03V o��T J fC qC Rp�Q
SHINN RD. Withrow wEsr �,m $ v�N
r��E a, c Rp F HURLEY F
H CH. `� / 3 A ' m w C ELEM. SCH. /
LOCKE a s;
SN�RR `R
j = x I o . 5R RILLS37
= c"n 4 /
j Greek 801 0,5� / 0 RD. 'I FORD n �
a� o� STEELE "' °°� TWP BARGER 1 ,� s y ��� oN
<^ MTN.1F V EW RD.
tplar
ar �� N BERRY 1 r TFIELlI RAWFDRD 1� CA I � .'
`� RD. 1 LN. DR. a' RpvN ° R�r9Ff �siYP
m LEh1 x COLIN Y GH OyGy r xa
SIRA 1\ Creek wr G£ pR• DR. V Q- �� QTi g1pC� z 0 NSF
GOODNIGHT RD O I °qy 9 m Opp DF
o PIN�EW h
f LIAR c1� OQ i SPI EWQU- ��Q�� REDR n LDFAR RD.�
LY L{ CIR. Oe 'Lid o mac) Q
Y.-°�oo°IUIDRsQ
61
_ IQ
150 FIRE z r I o9 oy�
� � II KERK MI' at~ Q~ ? IA. � F°cF�4 0p�� 4r SiONE'I c
GRAHAM + jfSLOAN r W i l ridfl'"" °°���C 9RLA D��Vt
iOOA RD. o I i �' ARA{RU r 5m R(1
MILLE S CHQAE� oQe 11
{ WAN BgUCOAr COOPER `k. m � ' I
RDCRFS m j I CI¢ t
ILLBRID HOP D'
o o rn C' E 4r G Ca C4 N
r" n Ew Ct� 1
ER o srpN A-
EAfMq y R.��,o� `1-•
.1 t v2�• �Q+ $f). RD TAhIMY RD. 2 3� ' A
av r
I � f H ' -RO• �.
ac;Haw Rn. �- �, o ' � �''�-- � f<N_cL_:{c� �• � Qa� � � � !
�pR r --=.KaROLLjIf, ?� "Icy oT O
RD REss s G a°P , � " y Roo $F � 601
w� .
c7 D.x QQ' Q- ,� r RD- '� `'cam 2F y►�' %/ ��
�tv (+l ��� BLUEFI LDS EALPIP
WI
LSON Q�i G m�b°Qo
KARRfv r AV �9� F• �? /
RD. a �y /\ / , aOP�S�a� K NG�s , CrR.D pRis R w
I Ak Hr SPRINGS o tp
�� z 7'0 / �'o '<�. `- y�„ D. WEAVE
M CARNS�CR i SOUTH- RO )AN
SST. R 4C& m I a o i0 f GH SC H.L� .F <y BUS 29 LOER 805E
9 V
RAY DR f) 9 F.� ON i r SC } F IER
c��[c
XTT c
66 {�<" A 6 A;:w z� yp
VE. crR �� F
'Lt,►ELL �• I CHIN y� m SJ Rp. 9(� �` r SCH.� / �`�� CH
^ems? o/ I ROLLIN6W'CR VE O BVO
` 4RRIKER O TwP B ryFy ( GREEN I xW �� O J GROVE <
�+L7MS RD �srp C,R QJ BRIA ¢ f' r \�. SEE cWNJS GrOE I°lj,5 .
n 5 �� a°4 153 A
L 0� o` �y A?� CORRIIE
RIARFIE �� LIPE RfDGE 4o
'E plc' o oW F �� F��/� 3 `S��� s c �O. MSCLi.
ATNEL� y��i p1gC. S� r I i° 601 mGw NG43 REDZE4p- I \ Q
I L` / � � •- o o ! � Ra. pA��
is
{ a: N
I+ M/Ty ���0* CLEAR- SPA RUTLEDGE d� SEE ' D� r q n SC 1 R�.
Rp FIELD, .� G� 5T. C INSET HER rY o n� ERCY o
Q� Q LANDIS RD.
- ENO DR
ILE
N y "RE
Enoc, !Ile / j KEVIN85
evsr/
I
o� RD. sTA aF �. .J �o��� ST.JN / M7'`�Ns �a RD. ¢
Cr U F R ;v' 22 n D. �L B@�1� F STI AM'
RDNTRr,O�EE y/C � - z ,L� � y OLD 712EN�S"'SEiL�/ "�00 c RFAG_ i
I.. Il. ii i A. Pnl p + GF CIR. ,. _.

Animal Waste 'NIana:4ement Plan Certification
or -:)mit ail lnf0r-m:1.1nto tli 1( dots not 1
Existing or es' or Expanded (Dlease circfe one)
General In f--)rmation:
`a ,e c r_r n: — j i l er _Farms_ - !ciiity No: gp-��_
art Mi I ler \c: 704-857-9887
Mai:in2A 510 Mi11er Rd. _Salisbj-iry, NC-28147 - _ --
L ,r,rr roc_..:c...China Grove, NC �Ii,oxan-
L a r : E s' Q -- a L_ � r, .ice_ � _ �� .�ij-- 1 c)
aiy� a a: r' z ,,nr i : , I aE : i� if'ar� ^,n i�� i .
.. S:. .. �1 a �J'� C. �� :L;•tll.T: '•V:Lc: G(:.- a.C! lL :�t i� ..s � L4 �:i�'Z 72.1�«' �� ji.2:::Its. CQsL
mi west _of 1 ,i4-0 pVP Qn _NC-_152_ N 2 tI1L_D
Miller Rd. to Weayer Rd. ], ZR mj L4. nn Ijea_ver Rd -_hair„y T.nra i-Pri nn
T
Onerntion DeSCriDtion:
%Vz:an to
Gi.ts
i:•J� :I r�ouilr'" 0. Qr.i,;irr._iS
:1 ?ullz! s
✓'vier Tee or �.re_'cC.,: `7ur:re: O! �.+:iu:
IE-r,.cncing Opercaon Onh
!Pre'" -ions :fie:,zr. CaVc; r: r,rora: DesiYn C: z=irr: Torn! De'si?r C.:.acin.
�.C:e�^� r,t�•i?�It Icr, ^r[:C?Gon: //T0 Ac.— 1T"'_ Q (o — --
�•uw C_. C7 _12Ccns .:C:.ac_ Penes I Total C2cacit,.:1pQ9 (0-- C-:b:c Fvn (ft'
e subs _�c c W.:s r_s,nt on (ue Cori: 113 Ur (pltrst e:r.:e one)
If YES: . subsurface dmins rreseat in t.'te •__ f (tie LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD rr{case c_rc!= cnef
.r.„...---".,............. ........... ............
....,.,.....N...n........t..,....R...., K.
Owner / N Iana;er Agreement
I t •Eves en^ v :iiat all the above infcrnatipn iS _ -c'_; and wiil be ucdatc'1 UZ%ln c^an_i(:�. i («e: understand tliz
and maintcnarct crcc_'.ur.s esmblisbed in the aperoved animal waste mina;cascnt plan fur the farm named abore anti •�iil
impic:ntC
nt L^cse roctulLns. I (we) know that Wriv expansion to the txistirts design capacity of Jic '.vas[c treatment and
Stara,. s:'stzni or conswuctiun of nc•.v facilities will require a new cc:uncauon to be submitted to the Division of
lyirUnme:ltnl Managtmtnt before the new animals are stac. ed" I (wO understand that there must be no dkcliarse ui
aliimai wa;ce Crum the storage or aaplicau.on sys.cm to sunac_ waters of the state either directly throud!i a man -clap!
con:e.,ancc or Crom a scorn e• a is less se,z:e man the ?W-year. ';-hour storm and the t must not be run-.uf: Cram
applicatiun of animal writ_. I (we) undo.-- . id that sun -off of pullutams Crum lounging and heavv use areas must be
minimized using technical standards de•:eloucul b,' utte Natural Resources Conszr'auon Sc~';c_. TheapQru�ed plan will be
tiled at Lac! arm and at the office of toe local Suii and Nate: Conservation Distrct. I (-e) know that an% mcditicabon
muse be acproved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conser•rabon District prior w
L-iole:mentztiun. A cban2c in lard uwnt: stiia re;uires wr-iuen notitieacun to DEM or a ne'.v certification (if [;vie approved
Plan is ctianp_•1) wiuhin 60 days of a titre =..siz:"
Name of Land Owner .
Si�rfature:
�3rne 4f tilalia^P�' ii ..::i?.'�.^.t ii.�.Iil L����•��.'•
Date:
Signature:
�t� c •- Auuu>t 1. 19V
Date

Technical Specialist Certification
{Cil4na[';l by the Ncrdi Cziuliiul Susl anal '%VatCr CCn$C.^.':cia n CGn i_.;iUn p'J.'.SC :'.t to I : 1.
`CAC 63 .rl�C I C�... _.ut
. tnt animal %'asie Cor Lht Ca= acu'e a:i ,^i^
riana�''...tn( pI"an fu'lat ..'� Qr cxC._'aS Slnnc.=,ds ana ; C:;(:C1t1i'n.5 of t!'_- :)ivtS:L)n c[ 1Cn [
(DEM) as `;C.-C `H.071i and , t: USDA-Naturai Rzsourcts Consc:-atiun St -.-ice {`.L CS) an
`'cr-.^ C -ol:r.a Soil and +�'�._. CunEt7 aOon Caromission cur<uant [o 15.a `C.,C _..._�! i and 1-4.A NC..0 br= .CCOI
L% InC!Lc:e'd to u7C plan 1s "_CHC}ele. %V ililC! each catC__Cr: d�SiS"_!eS.l ieC: n:C^I S�C.i�iS:
vGo ... StS^. CaC� ...:::iC [:Cn "SD. 5�. `�'17. RC. D. iC >�C_:a:;SC S cu!d on! c_.:I'. i� for
II. Certzj cation of Design
A) Collection. Stora,,e. Treatment Sv,;tern
ri:c approa,-iare co.:
wliho i -e!rniit (SD or Wi.: P)
slora�.'e Volume 's at!e'La for crt:-,Oon Cal 1C:R': stora_t' C:1GsnlliC•
New. e.cnande,J or-etrc[iued tac lit:' (SD)
nal waste siurage and treaunent SC-Uc:urP.s. suCh as but nut limit:'{ to
aa'.- cc:a d_si^_mt-J to aict. or exce-'d -h_ ^linimurn sLirl,LuLL s and ;�C'..[iu3titln5.
Name of Technical Specialist !Please R��y CEa ld7 E a
USA - S Dale �vur': Gorn.p; e^ Ll--�} t,'L_
? �r-_PcnSL7 (AR,2�c!);Z7 Z e- 40 37-I (p o4
Da(e: -7- q9
B) Land .aooiication Site (Wi.:P)
- c pian crovid_s for clinirlum sep,arltions (buffers;: adepuat: arnuum of land to vo-it. ut:iizzatun: C::o;k-n C:up is
abic for waste and nutricr.t lcadin_ nates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please P m):�f • �L f�c�c
o D A - Ty Dale Wur Comaie:ed' !-
z _4
7Z7-C- 01D o e-O 7r]�#
AI'td.r�ss (. �ea'")S {r burrs C_ Z l4 (o Ph(-)n� \'u• (C0y37- /(oD�l
SiT:S.�.tt: re:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check tire anpropriare bo.;
J Fuc—.iity withcut ?cte:ior lets (SD or WUF or RC)
ibis fac;iiLv dccs not cone: n any exrenor lots.
-74 F:.!c=lity with exterior lots (RC)
%lethods to minimize Lbe run off of pollutants f.cm lounging and heavy use arec.s have beet desi_ired in
accordance 'xiLh tcctnical sta dads deve!oced by ti-RCS.
.Name of Technical specialist (Please P-int)
= On CJ D - Date Wor': C'ornn!e!ea:.lI-
Z7Z'7-C-
address (�.?� t .) S b z P,"&L)r,e No.. 4-Co37-f(aaq
Sivria[,-,re: D E,t:
,%,wC
1'l1-

D). Ai)olicatinri and HandlinrT Eauinment
Crlr'c.: :!:e ;1p9r0.^.ri..:e
;1r 'r.""im? - '.,;[n 'IGiSn�".t'"1:,�'1nr'il��[IC]f1 '+IS+.f�fi1C^.0 I`4'i�?;r•r iJ '
S �i '.v15:C atpilC 1 U:p C.^.0 SL :i:cd in C p11n has bt�n _:L 6!�'?t L.2lCr1{�Lf Or
aC UrCanCe ',v1Lh .[lstin_ t;_:ivR i aft ant: {Soles acd is ablz to apply wasic as nCCf:..::-r; to aCcO"." atau
x'a.iC ^ana°C^1? l[ CI t: ;e ;:SiIRC appilCat:Cn _ Ll1pf^Cnt Can f0:'er Lc al"2 ti' �Z pia'1 a[ :a[Cs of
C_e� �iL` C. L^iC sCC_..._ itTa lllC Cr UL ^.t lCadi.nQ ra[C5. a sc°1C'ti',17_ :or ['.Shine C[ appi"C7L'Ci.s "as bC"a
4U:._ -::-ra6ca and Lred rs can and'+ _
-.W.r w;
:1 �".y ^;1l11!c'.I, nr .1c;11r 'xic?nw 'nlf'nmeni or
r.11mal was:C aoollC_t:Cn toulomtnt SCC'_...C1 ;n u:. plan :ias bCC1 dC:f_^.Ci. [o ac;al; '.:'.n-5{� as "CcmaI"'.' i0
aCC,^.mmCt:.ate LAC '.t'.'+_t[: MallaJPnlCnt plan: (pr7r o5C'! a0oiicalton Zouicrnz:nC can toyer aI_a ;eauiret bt' L`:!
Tian at MWS RCt to t'.zt: I-hd ScC' :I:C l hv.ZU!IL or ]UL'1Cnt Icadin_C rafts: a :C C L'iC (Cr .... ,^2
and!:cabons i zs bet 1 C:: CilSi1C(i: lr'.^. bu[iZ"s can aC Malrt„ncd: l'olibnuiun and =+ai.ianCC ar_
c�nL:incn. as -z.: of L:e 7:ani.
\�'.v nrn.lRliz nr_ : 'Minn +1C;i?(': ::tL`rlr!C s+1�;!n4 ,v15tZ nTrliCntinn t,-,L- r.'llt.".f t++r ':;.^.i! LOro t!Ino nr.t
= ra, ir-i ,atfl+n. (\Vi.:? or 1)
.n:11MI wa.Re aaCiicaL'on ecuipinc::t sCr'::ll. d ;n iJ;r plan has bC_:'S s.':CC:C 1 to 1CC1': :t'asie as nt'CCssar.: Io
i]n aCcO[lodalC ihY tL'a$iC Inana£em_.n,t Dian: (prUCUSC'.II 21cpiiCaGon CaUipmCnt Cat1 CD%-e. 11he 1rC1 rewired b� L
plan at ra(eS not ;o eS._'_',J till c.- L"Ie scCCil:ed h%d lic or nuL;ent IC2dino MteS: a :C1cC:uiC Cor 'd Lin% of
ooilcaucns bas beti Cstao[(shed: r;CulICd buffo s car. bC maintained: c:.iiC'm6un anU a�iUSt:'nCn( _'_SL+^.nCC
ccnmined as pLr; of dhC
\arse of Technical Specialist {?!ea.Ge r':in:):
a,ion
Siana:'.:re:
Duce NVors Coricie:e-':
Phone No.:
Cate:
E) Odor Control. insect Control. :Mortahty `iana,,,ernent_3nd Emer�ypncv ,kc.ion Plan (SD.
S1. W'UP. RC or I)
% axtr rianc:ernent for L`tis [aciii.-: includes a Waste NtanacPm�!nt Odor Cunucl C: C-ZUSL an !nsec:
Control Chec:;!isL a C` t:cUisz an',! an Em; e t'_ A.c:iun ?:an. 5,:.:rces of bow ccors =L!
^stC:S have b__n t aluate' ::';L'I icsp!:. t0 Llis silt! aR'' Best ? zc::C_s to Odom alit; Bey:
Manacerne:lt ?nc-ic_s io Conuoi Insects ha:•e __n -clot: and inC'.ude'+ in tape •.'.'axle m`:a;++erzen[ plan. 3CCh U:C
�1.: alir:. �[anae:cleat ?:ar.:.^.0 [J1c �mzr�c1c ?C::on ?'.an Irc cornn.ie:_ and Can be imeiz:me;ltcd by this
Larne of Technical Specialist (P!esse
ACCf i;a::0^ U s Date Wore ComplL:e'i:J— CP-gq
D
uD N r z I Phone No70a -Ca 37- I (ooq
Si+ -nature:
Date: I- 7-9f
F) Written_ Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The foi[a%Nin� si�naturr block is a� v to be used for new or expanding swine farrns that brain construction after June
2'. 1996. 1f the futility "'as built befl a June 21. 1996. when wos it cnnstructed or last
expanded
I l:'.e> ce:,ify that i (we) have attc.mnpted to co c: b:' ce:tific:i mail aJJ adjoining p,;,cen on-ne:s and all propd.ty owners
uao 0w,1 Croce-v located across a Dublic road. S Cr hiahwa:• irorrl Llls new or C'farm,
oandins swine fa. The notC wascas
in Comalianc� with {hc r�^wire ncnts of `CGS 106-6-s. A copy of the notice and a list of ;.be proccrry of:'ners nctiitcd is
:Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name- aC Nana+gar .. ..iffe:_^.; .ror-n
Si+_nature:
Date:
Date:

III. Cerrij1ccati017 of histallatiori.
A). Collection. Storzige. Treatment Installation
SLC Stara2e and Leatmmerit tuL not. !:rii—t to lazouns ntl ponds. !lave -;n.-n
aC-zoalancz 1-1c 3CCroved Pian tD minimum standari s and
For e.isnif;,lr:ci:i<ies �irhour re:roli:s. no cerriirca.,.on :s necessary.
game of Technical Specialist (P!e'ase
�_.i!!L on D'!(i Wt�:"ti L }i:svs
(A2?r1CV): P^cne No.:
8) Land .aoolication Site (WL'P)
Chect "he approprinte uo.r
l c—opping sVsi?:n is in pjaca on all land as :n thL- '•'_iitinal wasLe
Conditional Approval: a1i r!cu::e:1 land as _;,e_if z:d in the plan is e:car.'! , . planting:-. Lhc c-opping
:lied in the rite ut..:at:cn clan has not , ce... Lz li h_ a. d t< has
cot^ n;,:e l to esi3iit5❑
_ _tauon as scec. ed in t.^c plan bt' (rnonthJda_N•i.. =j: L,` t: pmpcsed co�'e: c.-: is
2:;,rocrate for comp iiar:c_ '.vim Lhe xasi�' till' lticn plan.
AlSD cheCk this bcX iT c'.00roaria,le
if LhC C.0coine S.SiC n ^5 sCCin Ohe plan cill riot bt! :si2blished 01 n:.L'!v e:e:ie•f !and L6-ilhin :0 Lays
of ih:5 c-, uflcation• LhC owner T_'S zommiti_d to establish an intc::m cr0:� for=ro.Ston conLrol:
Name of Technical Specialist (P!�:Sv P:::::!: � oG�_ _r s RGp—
ii::::cr: VSC?,8-NZc—S _ _
lDateVorkcm-5
7Z� qy
7 0 A 3-7- /CpO,4
dress (.-\s°.t' ncv): S ALr rNC a;lLne No.:
Date: 1- 7-
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in IN. E
above has been checked.
1 (we) certify that l.(we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) le Sim uulicatiun Tian.
and if aecroeriate to establish the info-im crop for erosiutt conuoi. and will submit to DELI s ve:-ification of comflletiun
from a icchnicol Specialist within 15 calendar flays follo-in_^_ the date specified in the condibonal certification. I ('•�c?
realize that failure to submit Ibis verification is a violation of die «•aste manaecmznt plan and will subjz'--t me (us) to an
caforcemi it action from DEM.
Name. of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if dine;e tt from OW-Rd,-i:
Signature: Date:
AWC -

C:+ Rur4()ff Controls frnrrl Ezt.rinr Lnts (RC)
% :ih mot: i?rhm As
..i
Wwas > :u Amnuz: we ruI cit o uilutants .mrn own ging and AW7 use my lr % j tcjn 4unk'! as i.L'cC;iie j
111 VC _ ia1.
For faciiiries 'wi:hout e tenor lots, no certIjmhon is necessar_;.
Name of Techricai Specialist (P!eze P-r,t): I vGE 113E2
US D -> l 2 C-5 Date iVor:: S- t 1 -9 8
{ Z� 7-C a to
'c-ess r�r7.. s A N Z t =:pane Xo.:— 6.37--1 &C4
D) Aoolication and Handling* Ecuioment Installation (WUP or I)
Check :lie aqrop6are No
_,.' ,-.nAN wLs;= lardU112 .cuiprl_n: s, ecirned in LN 701 A W We and rind•:
_ailraC1uu any--ciu'su'nent. r1atC 33 have Leon provides :U we Owners and .ire .=ln..'i as F tir of we pl=
.j Animal wasm zppiicat:Un and yl pnwm speanad In to phn 4s not ton 11i :11C'1 but Lie- ov,,i e'
'ins propused lc_sing cr anrd pary appH aWn and VIM provided a sign,-,1 conunc:: equipment spccirleil. in
me :unum ayrm wit die re'qui cawnu of we plan: rquired buriers can be imainL:.incd: caii0rltlun and
Njus:lient 200 rlc-. have been Ciovided w Lle Oxne s and are c :r.'r1ln.ed as part Of ::ie C1.111,
AY—Condil:knal approval:. w•asce app[icadon and handAng _ui rn= sFWaN in Ge. plan .as
__r pu .aa-,e a d uiil bt on site and .ns aped by rrnor,tt'd- earl: tiler_ is acieaunit:
:0 told a•'a..S:e unul we tqui^'1C^C is Ins[alltd and unui :lie was c can be larld appilC'L ..I
.:It.. ^.e c:oppin, s•:s.C.m [an'uuned in the :tar: arid :aliCm6on. and aCiu's::.te.nc iL. RCa hay.-
ceen goAded rc Cc o•%-n:! s =d are conmineJ as ^a.- ..:.he plan.
dame of Technical Specialist (?!tease Pri O:
....:ario*: Date Comole:ed:
l � l•^ �1•
Phone Xo.:
Da
The ioHowin!z si2na:ure biock is only to be !Led when the box for conditional aporovai in III D
above hasbeen checked.
I , ..at I {tick, ..: com:,ii,:- d to purz::ase the anim::l %vusze appiiczon acl; tiardling equipment :s
sym ned in (our) was,: manageme .-, plLm and v.-+li submit to DEM a venticaticn of !e!ivz - and installation
:;urn a 1 e-• 7• = Spem ails: if cal. tridir days fol[owing t",e We st:m fliz1 in [lie corLitional ce.",iricaucn. I
(we e emize cm °a�iiure to submit Z16Ls vim..:ic lion is a :sell= waste .7, ar:a_U_:nent plati and will sub_irc:
{us) to an en:crce ne a acaor.:` om DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if diff,2reni from o%vne,*
Signature:
Date:
Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality NI2na2ement (SD. SI. WUR RC or I)
`T,f""cds to Cc,n. roi clicrs and ins,c:s as s4ecitied in the Plan hove bte:i installed and are operudonal. Tne
MCI- ali:v ; an:lee,;ient s•:stem as spec:;led in the Plan has also Ise_:i installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (PI e:se P.int): f"�- _0CE
=.:.�;let:on 2-C-S Date Wo r< C)mple:ea:5-- 11-9T
(.AOX,Cv ?- r ID a Co �` fp p` cnL `'� ?64
AWC -- .august 1. 1997

3.0$0 )
WASTE UTdLIZATION PLAN
Producer: Miller Farm
Location: 3510 Miller Rd., Salisbury, NC 28147
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Dairy
Number of Animals: 200
(Design Capacity)
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. - Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to
be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates,
leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to.10 tons
per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
,surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters
which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to .
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor.
problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab
for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

MUD.
'� 1 I

2
M.
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. When
the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and 1 or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should
be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize
the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed..to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.
K

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
A 200 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs.
Solids will be collected on the lot and will be land applied with a manure spreader. Lot
runoff and urine will be collected in the waste storage pond and land applied with
irrigation system.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
Solid accumulation:
200 animals x 1.5 (ft3/day/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days) x 75 (% confinement
time) = 82,125_ ft3 of waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen A Produced Per Year
200 animals x 73 lbs. N/ani.mal/yr = 14,600 lbs. Total N from lot
PAN from Waste Storage Pond
451,313 ga1/90days. X 1.7 Ibs11000 gal = 767 PAN/ 90 days
767 X 4 = 3068 PAN/yr
Total Nitrogen produced/yr. 17,668 lbs. Total N
(PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:
FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1
3

. 4
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your waste storage pond is designed for 90 days of temporary storage and the 'temporary
storage must be removed on the average of once every 3 MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of
93.$__ . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation.
Your feed lot has sufficient area to store manure for 60 days and will be stockpiled and hauled
as needed and weather permits.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (Formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
This operation has 140 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation will be a 2 year
system of corn cut for silage in the first year, followed by small grain and soybeans in the second
year. Nitrogen will be applied to crops based on the realistic yields at the rates listed in table 1.
Timing and application rates will be as followed:
Corn silage: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Sm. Grain silage: Sept.- Oct. at the rate of 125 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Soybeans: April -Jun. at the rate of 1001bs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting.
Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 110 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac.
On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%.
Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon,
tanker or manure spreader. Maintain all waste handling equipment in accordance with
manufactures specifications. The system should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage
and proper system.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
j _ f3UV 5u dot

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal
discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste.
If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall
provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crap yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS).. If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where
runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required 'by
DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian
Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]
5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATION
(Continued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no
more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filter Strips]
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property -and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
0

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(Continued)
17. Lagoons and other uncovered Waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
19.If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.
7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on -site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: rr//e✓ rrm,5
(Please print)
pq
Signature: Date:,_ 7 7I
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print) B - :E 2" x(_i' � ,__
Affiliation: L 2 S L L---., .,- M
Address (Agency): 2--2 Zw_7- L- © l Q_-) o t cc 5 �L �
Signature: L- b IIA-4.1- `L _ __ __ Date: r 7 JI

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I,
Waste Utilization System on
shown below.
hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his
acres if my land for the duration of time
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other
trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I
also 'understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial
fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Date:
Waste Producer:
Date:
Technical Representative:
Date:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Term of Agreement:
19 to , 20
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
W

LA. \�
'TRAVELER RERC0R4!ANCE CLiART
HYDRANT
TRAVEL
LANE
T--
TRAVEL
LANE
DISTANCE
.4' APPLICATION RATE
(TRAVEL SPEED = 3.3 F'T./M;N,f
EFFECTIVE
LFNGTH
EFFECTIVE
0DTH
EFFECiIs'E
IRRIGATED
ACRES
i RUN
HOURS
GALLONS
LBS. N I
H1
A
950,
1122'
244'
6.3 AG.
5.8 HR.
68,500 GAL
116.5 LBS.
H2
B
950,
1122'
240'
6.2 AC.
5.8 Hit.
68.500 GAL.
116.5 1_BS.
H3
C
950'
1122' 240'
6.2 AC.
5.8 HP.,
68,500 G.AL
116.5 LBS.
H4
D
880'
1052' 244'
5.9 AC.
5.4 HR,
64,40C GAL.
109,5 LBS.
NOTE: ALLOW 30 MIN. AT START AND END OF TRAVEL
. . LANE FOR EQUVILENT APPLICATION RATE

I- i'•.
'10 Wow&
f! 1�.4,®rdry
P'4
A
ry. �+ ,,i ���•�,r.���.:i') iV u; 1. wt, r',ti. J4•��yT f sy� YJ. s .,' 1_ {` ,y�•", y1., t�-i• �'.�eL-'«:
1Y
71
r�+ r sY IL -? Y, fit:.' ':i '7• iA' si„ �; _.S: , r •4
Of I
Ow
44
71
No
Sia,
'. .da
44
1pf lop",
mot 1
too sit i
ti
4

r'^ ...�,
�y .,! .

TABLE 1
PRODUCER NAME: Robert Miller
DATE: 1 /6/99
Tract Field
Soil
Crop
Realistic
Lbs_ N Acres
Lbs. N
Type
Yield
Per Ac.
Utilized
19022 1
31 B2
Fescue/Pasture
3 T/ Ac.
150
4.5
675
2
31 B2
Fescue/Pasture
3 T/ Ac.
150
1.4
210
3
31 B2
Fescue/Pasture
3 T/ Ac.
150
4.4
660
4
31 B2
FescuelPasture
3 T/ Ac.
150
3
338
5
31 B2
Fescue/Pasture
3 T/ Ac,
150
8.1
911
6
31 B2
Fescue/Pasture
3 T/ Ac.
150
6.2
930
19016 1
31 B2
Corn Silage
15 TI Ac.
150
110
16,500
1
31 B2
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac.
125
110
10,313
1
31 B2
Soybeans
30 bu/ac
100
110
8,250
2
31132
Corn Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
3.3'
371
2
31132
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac.
125
3.3
413
2
31132.
Soybeans
30 bu/ac
100
3.3
330
TOTAL
140.0
39,900
lbs. of N
Number of Cows
200 Amount of N
produced/year
17,668
lbs. of N
Using 75% Collection
43.251
lbs. of N
Amount of Nitrogen produced for 2 year crop rotation
26,502
lbs. of N
Deficit of N
13,398
lbs. of N
'This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied,
they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of
North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.
W
tl�
H

97-YO3 O-L --b;,N
,t t3sNA �
RI
7�'t i iG El
dNod 39315+�
M.

43 r 3
r
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 4N
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE D 6 49
'9
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: Miller Farm
DATE: January 6, 1999
Contact the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources - Division of Water Quality - Winston-Salem Regional Office at (910)
771-4600 if the problem occurs Monday through Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm.
If the problem occurs outside of those hours contact the State of North Carolina
Department of Crime Control and Public Safety - Division of Emergency
Management - Raleigh at 1-800-662-7956 or [phone]. Provide the following
information:
FACILITY NAME: Miller Farm
LOCATION: 3510 Miller Rd., Salisbury NC 28147
REGISTRATIONIPERMIT 9 80-14
If there is danger to human life, downstream residences, roads, etc. call 911 of the
Rowan County Sheriff's Department at 636-1011
• Begin lowering the liquid level in the pond by applying waste water to nearby
irrigation fields if possible.
• Contact a contractor to begin repair of the problem to minimize off -site damage (list
the names and phone numbers of three below).
NAME
PHONE NUMBER
I
L. P. BarEer, Jr.
633-9693
2
La Powell
278-0527
3
Kenny Williams
r 636-0686
• Contact the Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
at 63 7-1604
• Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage pond . If this
specialist is no longer working or is not available, contact another technical specialist
who has design approval such as the Area Engineer,
NAME
PHONE NUMBER
L.M. Safley Jr.
919-851-8528
Lan F. Graham
910-673-0487
J. Donald Matthis
910-592-5519

1,03,01 loom
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source
Cause
1IMPS In Control ]nsecls Site Specific Practices
----
Liquid Syslt:nls---
I'Ittsh I illllcrs
• Acl'llnlrllation of solids
fw flush systv,Il Is designed and operated
sufliciewly to remove accnmtrlmed solids from
gulters as designed.
f11 RCIlInVC bridging Of accuu 11'.11 :d solids 111
disclulrge
l.,lt;uuns and i'its
Crusted Solids
Maintain lagoons, sellting basins and Ails whole �—
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crnsting of solids In a depth of nn more lhan 6 -
Ii inches Over more Ihan 30,E of srlrl-41ce.
—I r<ccsyive Vcgclative
Dccllyillg vugelatiml _
Fvr Ivlaimain vegetative cnntrol along banks of —
(,IiNL'11l
lagoons and nther impotlodl1IC111s to l7ruvclll
aceunlublinn of decaying vegetative matter
along wiper's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
beet] Spillage
JI:CL:tl Sim;1E.c ACCmI111latinrlS Of feet] residues
Dry Syslerns
f� Design, operate ,unl Incliruain fccel systuus (e.g.,
Ilunkcrs and Irrnrghs) to n,ininlize the
accumulation of decaying ► astage.
[V Ctean up spillagt: nn a ronline basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during; %vinler).
Redid: moisture acconitilmion within and
arnuud immediate perlllleler of feed stol lagu
areas by illSuritlt; elr:Iin,It;c aLvay 1-14)111 silt
and/or providing ade+luale cnnlainnlenl (e.g.,
covered hin lilr brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
fur ]nsllecl lilr aml renuwe nl' break till actmintdaleil
solids in tiller srlIlls ,nonnd Baal stolal;e as
needed.
ANtlt' - I•lovewber 11, 1996, Page. 1

Snurcc Cause
IINIPS to Control 111SCOS Site Specific Pracliecs
Animal 1 holding Areas 0 Accumulations of animal wastes (Rd
Eliminate low areas that Irate moisture along �
and feed wastage
fences and other Incalions where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
C1
Maintain fence ro%vs and filter strips arntind
animal holding areas to minimize .
accnmtih tions of wastes (i.e., inspect fur anti
remove or break up accntmllmed solids as
needed).
Di y hhurnue 1 I,,n,lling Accunutlatiorls of.uiimal wasles Hemove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
S� sterns
clay interval during summer; I5-30 clay interval
during winter) where manure is lnaded for land
application or disposal.
14-,1'
Provide for adeouale drainage around manure
stockpiles.
fW
Inspect for and remove or break up nccuurl,lalell
wasles in filler strips around Stockpiles and
manure handling areas its needed.
for nwre in(urm,uion contact the Cooperative Extension. Service, Department of Iinlnruotngy, Box 7613. Nnrill Carolina ('wic t Iniversily,
I(Acig.h. NC, 2761h-7613.
AMIC -,her 11, 1996, Page? *

3.3.i3
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Sl�nl'e:e:
cause
11hil's lo, 1ti'1ilihilkic 041111- Site Specific Pracl1ec5
larnlNlcall
0 Dairy production
VUgeladve Or WOOded IlnffcrS —
5
Recommem led Nest 1)WWlgc111cn1 11raGICLS
V
Good jnlgment and common sense
Tavel lugs or barn alley
0 Wet Inan111-e-covered surfaces
lVY
Scrape or flush daily
surlaces
�,,
F(
Promote drying with proper ventilation
1111<
Rats iFic checks and maintenance on Waterer],
hydrants, pipes, stock ranks
Itc�i11c11 :ucas
Wine
Promote shying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial decomposition
Replace we:t or manure: -covered bcddiug
Alalinre LIry S1ackS
Slurilge Will: ur hasin
sutfa�c
• Partial microbial decomposition
• Pal-lial t111cr011iM 11ccoluposilion ;
• N1ixillg while filling ;
• Agitation when emptying
Provide: liquid drainage for stored nlanllre:
n Bottom or mid -level loading
n Tank covers
0 Basin surface mats of solids;
PY Minimize lot nrrloffan l liquid addilions
rlr Agitate only prior to miulurr: removal
rl Proven biological additives or oxidants
Scrlling basin surl.lces aPartial
microbial decomposition
n
Liquid dra;rlagl: 11'Om seWe:d solids
•
Mixing while fining
f►Y
Remove solids regularly
•
Agilalklll when enlptyirtg
hl;mllrc, Slurr y ill ShIdgE
Agitation when spreading
fl
Soil inject inn Ol'SIMrylslndges
S11rca1icl. mAlcts
Volatile gay emissions
Wash residual Manure Irmo spreader alicr use
n
proven biological additives or oxidants
1111:01VUICII manure.
Vulur;lu gas emissions whila
r"l
Soil injcClion ol'slurry/s111d1;e:s
Slurry ur slutlgc un field
crying
rl
Soil incorporalion wilhin 48 llrs
su1 Glee,
Spread in thin llnifilrol layers Iur rabid drying
n
Proven biological additives err oxilleulls
ngilal;un ofrceycicd lagoull
rl
Flush,tanit covers;
lirplid While tanks are: lining
f7
I-xlend lilt lilies to ncar bulbul OI laillcs wile
anti-slprnll Vents
Clellsidu drain collection Agitation during wasle:wme:r lFi 11Ox covers
or jullctiun boxes conveyance
Am(W- 1-hlven11)er It, 1900, hI81:

Source
_ Cause -
mws la Mininniic Odor' — ^- Site Specific Practices
Lift stalions
0 Agilalion during sump tank
El
Sump lank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at
• Agitation during wastewaler
0
Extend discharge point of piles underneath
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surf,rces
• Volatile gas cnnission;
Cl
Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing;
Cl
Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation
fl
Minimum surface area-lo-vohune ratio:
0 Minimum agitation when pumping;
Cl
Mechanical aeration;
C1
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler a i ligh pressure: agitation;
Cl
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
119cl.lcs a Wind drift
fl
Minintmn recommended operating procedure;
13-
Pump intake near lagoon liclnid surface;
El
Pump from second -stage lagoon;
n
Hush residual manure frann pipes at curl of
shlrrylshulge punlpings
f)e:ad animals Carcass decomposition
fl
Proper disposition of carcasses
Stainling eti•are:r aromrd • Improper drainage;
❑
(irlde and lanelscapc such that water drains
Iacilitics Microbial decomposition of
away from fiaciliti"
organic matter
Kiml Irar:ke:d onto I,r[blie Pearly maintained aea.'Css roads
n
Farm access Mad u►aintenaoce
mods Burn I1.1nn access
Addilional InlOrmation :
Availaldc From
FL 111c hl;anure Ma[uage one au ; 0200 fttlle/l3MP Packet
NC 5l l (.aunty I x[e usiun Center
Dairy I:dncaliunal 11161 Manure Management System - Lake Wheeler
Road Field Laboratory ; Ii13A F 209-95
NCSI l - BAI:
Lagoon Design and Management Jor Livestock Manure Treatment and
Storage ; FBAIi I03-83
NCSI1 - BA I?
Numigumcm of Dairy Wasimmer ; FBAE 106-83
NC.S1I - BAI:
1'alib►mion ufManure and Wastewater Applicalion Equipment ;
FBAF
Fact Sheri
MCSll - HAF
.Nitisauce Conccins in Animal M,mure Miuungenlenl: Odat'S and
Flies ;
PR0107, 1995 ConferePce Proceedings
Florida ('ooperativc FXICIISi[m
otbcr 11. 1996, Page 2

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within ?' hcu.s after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 fee: from any :lowing
stream or public bodv of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-15S.7
.� Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only'. 'piacing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of A r,culture
�! Any method %vhich in .the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of pant of a dead animal's value without endangprinn
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
a

DATE: 12/29/98
Robert Miller
Dairy Waste Storage Structure
Rowan, NC
Design Criteria:
150 Dairy cows at 1,400 lbs. each = 210,000 ibs. live weight
90 days storage
5 gal./day/cow of waste water
26,136 sq. ft. of non -pond Drainage Area
Waste from Freestall area and access alleys will be scraped and stared
on the lot and land applied. Runoff from
approximately 26,136 sq. ft of the bams and loafing lot will be stored in the waste
storage pond.
I. Storage Volume Required
A. Urine Storage with 75% confinement
150 cows X 3.12 gal,/day/cow X 90 days
3.3 ,1 5'
4.223 cu. ft
7,48 gals.lcu.ft
B. Waste Water from Milk Earn
150 cows X 5 gal./day/cow X
7.48 gals.lcu.ft
C. Normal Runoff from Open Areas for 90 days
Drainage Areas = 26,136 sq, ft
1 day CN 981 30 day CN 92
Monthly
Months Precip. (P) (inches)
December 3.56
January 3.72
February 3.78
11.06
8.44 runoff inches X
12 inches ! ft,
90 days
26,136 sq. ft.
9,024 cu. ft
Monthly
Evap. (E) P - E
1.1 2.46
1.1 2.62
1.83 1.95
7.03
D. Waste Feed and Bedding
0 cu. it 1 day X 90 days= 0 cu. ft
TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED r 31,630 cu, fL
18,382 cu. fL
Runoff (inches)
2.69
2.85
2.9
8.44

Add to iiquid Volume -
II. Normal (P) Precipitation less (E) evaporation on Structures for 180 days
October - March 7.03 inches =.
Ill. 25 yr. storm on Open Area of 26,136 sq. ft.
CN = 95 for open areas
With 25 yr. 1 day Strom of 6.0 inches, runoff = 5.41 inches
26,136 sq. ft X 5,41 inches runoff
12 inches
11,783 cu.ft.
10,692 sq. ft surface area of storage pond
IV. 25 yr, storm on Pond Surface
25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 inches
V. Emergency Spillway
25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 inches
Peak discharge = 3.2 cfs.
Use ESW with 12 ft. bottom width,
3 to side slopes, 0.2 ft. stage
VI. Freeboard
W. Total Deptn of Pond 10 feet of storage
60,336 cu. Ft designed amount
43,413 cu. Ft, amount needed
16,923 cu. Ft amount surplus
0.6 ft.
11,783 cu. ft.
1.1 ft.
0.5 ft.
0.2 ft.
1.0 ft.
13.39 ft.

.110
303 110
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: Miller Dairy
DATE: 10/18/00
• A 4" X 4" treated post, painted white or a 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation 95.5 At no time should the
effluent level rise above the maximum liquid level, which is 2.6 feet level below
r the settled top of dam.
i
• A visual inspection of the waste storage pond will be performed at least twice a year.
The inspector should check the condition of the dam and the emergency spillway.
The inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the back
slope and at the toe of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to
check for signs of damage due to varmint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.) burrows. A
visual inspection should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the
structure is not experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be
' brought to the attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
'k The waste storage pond will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded areas shall be
' repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground cover shall be
reseeded to provide a vegetative cover sufficient restrain erosion. The dam and all
constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 500 pounds of 10-10-10 per
acre or its equivalent.
16
' • Maintain all waste handling equipment —pumping, loading, hauling, spreading, etc. --
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
• All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization
plan. The waste storage pond will be emptied at the end of each design storage period
( 90 days or 3 months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
. i
M� See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information an sampling and testing of the
effluent.

4
Miller Farm
ert Miller
655 Weaver Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
Facility No. 80-14
r
Rowan County, North Carolina
^iFP.iIM.rY,a/Y./ORI�[1 Y V b.W NIYXIY NNNIY
t
r
A
�a� G�rysFo
Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan
(0200 Certification Plan)
For a herd size of:
200Mitk Cows
In Cooperation with the
Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
November 7, 2001

c AV yBr d ?' ��°t�cb asp.
03
LBRlHGE RD. , M/((RR,
OG
UgR(,N Gov N a� SF— ' z
---�T
/0 S��o _ o � .nn Q.
I �ORRIHER \ 1�i0NS O�S�Rc ' 2
= Cep
U
OR. o= DOGWQDD \ rn . 8
ro n ROCK
KY RD. GDDDAI4 \ ��, I .pe r 70v �n
CR E \ Q Aq t
j 8 AVER ' . J RD, \ T� yr
-l:[7 U.
k
—�o°ti <`� ey
,{ Ill � s , Nov \ o 0o c
NEL ��d a <'r' d 1O�1ROUN RY \WS. RD. 4 o Z�\a Re:
m \ `1C� 0 LUE JAY r. i'dZi \ 00
a °do30
BILLY M
Sr.
1 n ` � � g S �� r•��yc\ / �-f,\ � I Hy .� 1H91NOOQ9
r ci ,�311iA!
W' CHINA GROVE 5S
dN1�� K RD. I S: \ \ �• i /(r .-.. 0� a C3 M- r' 83 Val g rn ,`�4� t
D 0�� CAnj� t/��L % +a' f i., p$ tN r p CA tv v s^f
zl CID, �9i �\ �oFLEY� (fi as 30HS
T ' 4 - Lp15 LFI,
aH 31V1S r PJNEY_ r \1 . O `� v c� Pf(C Eg Mq
I a ,II�. 3 WOpp � G��R�Scg4k�s p -�k1y�
ca
'M@? < 1� 03 �� tp . O a� O �1 1Fi --Rp Ck ry did
an g o o �C"7 /dam ^�'�Q,<r r .� i 108vi"A r s
OIC>J ARAN-r In0 j4
Rb. $
!1f'1J�',III'dllk o 3 zm�� • ?r S5 ��� a -a
T?o�m Ay ��� IN efRr�E 3H
N13 0� o m H,k Q` 4 IA b n ~ •Cr;
M, A r D EIy l;
U) r � zo � � �O • � c��i Cc = � �8 rn m �J�Cjp��� � VI
p iQ 1 nibs,, lH m � q0. Y a)gyp', ! C A rD O Z
KETHE FARM m- luS QL! .y
/Afr"
rn
Rfl Y�,.� �,Yco
r
ff 1 pad m x MICR H RAT \ y,'
I d\pd Cn r� o CRSABLE
n�n1EnI� ; DER o n m'i'
i
l Pk :-D I I �� �m A
N/ aRO �� o 0

Pi
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
11-05-2001
This plan has been prepared for:
Miller Farm
Robert Miller
655 Weaver Road
China Grove, NC 28023
704-857-3031
This plan has been developed by:
C. Lipe Barrier, Jr., Environmental Spec. II
DSWC
Iredell SWCD
Statesville, NC 28677-2942
704-873-6761 Ext. 3
- -4 ! 1117
DeveldIfer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required
Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
1< Im
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: eA�
Technical Specialist Signature Date
------------
714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 11-05-2001 Cover Page 1

Map and Field Legend
0 Miller Farm
Irene H., Robert and Mike Miller
Field Number Total Acres Broadcast Acres Irrigated Acres Land Use
Tract 19016
1
36
11.4
Cropland
IA
6.3
6.3
Cropland
1B
6.2
6.2
Cropland
1C
6.2
6.2
Cropland
ID
5.9
5.9
Cropland
2e
33.0
33.0
Cropland
20
33.0
33.0
Cropland
1 g
8.4
8.4
Hayland
3
3.2
3.2
Hayland
4
3.2
3.2
Hayland
5
17.1
17.1
Cropland
6
8.1
8.1
Hayland
7
12.8
12.8
Cropland
8
3.3
3.3
Cropland
Tract 19022
1
4.5
4.5
pasture
2
1.4
1.4
Pasture
3
4.4
4.4
Pasture
4
3.0
3.0
Pasture
5
8.1
8.1
Pasture
6
6.2
6.2
Pasture

Pil A:r"Igr` ts' :'ih
Lei � �.aT�g' � ,i'�` �. a!M ..i, YT.^�al V g�� � , • Ni:1{;, y
:- M
{i�y i :.4f� M y Y•-0 t i �b
':is '.7�h ;k cc }nfr■'�,�.^_jF,i: ..,tZ,

1 •.! 4. +'► � �'� � 1 t t ? lFY� t •ram ��f', ♦ t��`�n� �\ � t4. \ j . , � _.
�At',r`e, 11�� •e - �1 •��� i!�" r ,• ! !lit, .1�-i ,� i.
Soil Survey Map z
Miller Dairy
Facility N
o. 80-14
Yfu`RI �� ���-I-c •i-i. {t -. '.'-r'•a 'Fs 4 _71
Robert Miller
UPO " 655 Weaver Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
(� A 1,kid , ,,,.$P "d": .{2,'�y at ,� i};+�'t �} `',ti•+s - -r<....., pp--77 i d PfT
TL
' '!f � � i ��� �`"y't I ��T l'.Y I a' �~ lY�ls 'i. li' t, � ! .�,;+•�L I �, ..� �+�'!-,,j
'y � r �! F� +rca ••"$ it � % �' �rti _ .1 � �. � +s•':i�..
t3z
•«� .. fit' r4cY' �j` �, .o. +'a i?�.�pi �r .; A'� .:.--..rw.t,,, .r' +y'y�-}T�fQ W'W
` Y ' ? � � � Spy a�f � r1- -W .. .•ili - � %� x �.
4. .i,! . t J G � c,, � � �>� 7 � `t � � f,,, r M �y "'�'��•:rt"��. r� � ik. �,��' �, i�a� 4i� rr'�?7'�J{��,�...r
_ADZ rt r 1 ,� �: e y�1"1 31 S Z. � 4•.; ro-tjL` r�! �,r,:b-! ,d, ±; r•f i- f>t�V'�t1'4F� rt. �,.','t`s �.w►:.«:+•...
sell
' �. •. f � 1 r - ,.�yR,�w;�l •y. by t
. y '•' 41i�ir' l ,��e��yyJ I C S Wht( - • J--,f.i': l _ . _
' ,rTi .'l..r $. N ' f r4 5's+� d! lr ,E- 1� t� n ■y '� 'fi
job.
'�ri 4 k.jii+�9,r�!'x��• � •� �t�,a, � ,- E r,�t� t� � --p ' f .r,+ - v
R'
t.' " •-r 31B2 ,t' •*� Y. t. q `�' -,�, 1 % -fir '�1 :,, ,
FS��,:��= , ✓ � r "r t � �i ! -t - 'si s�.'t� � S1 F '•� fF.7r ,-,
31
fill
JF
,�� •w y * f �a•� ti ! a1. d '1p 'ty,-��- �r.�dS� f � �. � 57B ,� r, '..ti -.�,` r
/,t3 4.1 �w[T•, -� _ r, �'- rf.• -_�:� Ali; !� ,1
'�•t,.r I „vd '�.s ! �, .4".�• 1 �rl n I •3lD

0
Narrative
The Miller Farm
The Miller Farm is owned by Irene, Mike and Robert Miller. The farm is planned for 200 Milk Cows.
Additional animals not being milked such as dry cows, heifers and calves are managed at a separate
primarly pasture farm and are not included in this plan.
The Milk herd is managed on pasture 50% of the time and in the feedlot, freestall or milking parlor
the other'50%. The feedlot, and freestall waste is scraped and stockpiled for up to 90 days on the
upper part of the feedlot. The feedlot runoff, storm water, milking parlor wash water and animal
waste flushed from the parlor waiting area are collected and stored in the Waste Storage Pond (WSP)
for up to ISO days. Waste is flushed from the parlor waiting area using recycled water from the WSP.
The waste and wastewater stored in the WSP are disposed of by irrigation on cropland using a
traveler irrigation system. Solids are spread on pasture and cropland.
In the event, that total comfinement is required and all the waste is collected in the WSP, storage
capacity is sufficient to hold waste for 90 days.
It is important on this farm to estabish a history of soil and waste sample results to make the best
use of the nutrient produced on this farm. Slurry waste should be sampled during each irrigation
following agitation of the WSP. Solid waste should be sampled at the time of spreading. Test results
are
needed to complete required records for animal waste disposed of The soil test are required to
monitor the nutrient and mineral levels in the fields used for disposal.
714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 11-05-2001 Narrative Page 1

0
The Miller Farm Animal Waste Sources
Animal Waste is collected both as liquid slurry and as solids from the same area. In this
plan, 50% collected as slurry and computed using Slurry Tables and 50% is collected as a Solid and
computed using the Surface Scraped tables.
Miller Farm Slurry
Slurry collected as animal waste, surface runoff, wash water, storm storage, and rainfall
in the Waste Storage Pond
From the Miller Farm Waste Storage Pond Design,180 Day Storage, Page 2, Normal Pump out
volume.
1,187,265 gals. animal waste is collected each year and require disposal.
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) from this source
is 200 dairy cows x 14 gals/cow/day x 50% of source x 50% confinement x 365 days divided by
x 14 lbs N/1000 gals. = 3577 lbs of PAN
Miller Farm Solids
Solids are collected and stored on the lot is a stock pile for up to 90 days.
200 Milk Cows x 93 lbs x 50% of source x 50% confinement x 365 days divided by 2000 lbs/ton
= 849 tons/year.
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) from this source
849. tons x 4.3 lbs/ton = 3649 lbs. of PAN annually
- - -714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: l 1-05-2001 Narrative Page 2

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U29
Miller Daia Solids waste generated 850.00 tons/year by a 200 animal
Dairy Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
3659
Incorporated
4850
Injected
NIA
Irrigated
N/A
Actual PAN Applied
Year 1
30330
Year 2
30379
U28
Miller Daia Slurry waste generated 1,187,266 gals/year by a 200 animal
Dairy Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
3579
Incorporated
4880
Injected
5531
Irrigated
3253
Actual PAN Applied
Year 1
1215I
Year 2
I2151
Notes:
In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan"
for guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 11-05-2001 Source Page 1

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake. 1
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included.
A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the
manure generated by the operation. Animal operations that generate liquid waste and utilize waste storage facilities (lagoons or holding ponds) may apply mor
or less waste in any given year than is annually generated by the facility. In order to determine whether the plan adequately utilizes the waste produced by the
facility, the storage capacity table included in this plan should be reviewed to ensure that the design capacity of the storage facility is not exceeded during the
planning period.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to
balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of
animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res. -
(Ibs/A)
N
i
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
lbs/A
1000
I gal/A
tuns
1000 gals
tons
19016
1
U29
Cecil
4.5
4.5escue
Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7131
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.0
34.2
0.0
153.7
19016
2
U29
Cecil
1.4
1.4
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.0
34.2
0.0
47.8
19016
3
U29
Cecil
4.4
4A
escue Pasture
4A
Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.0
34.2
0.0
150.3
19016
4
U29
Cecil.
3.0
3.0
escue Pasture
4A
Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.0
34.2
0.0
102A
19016
5
U29
Cecil
8.1
8.1
Fescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.0
34.2
0.0
276.6
19016
61
U29
I Cecil
6.2
6.2
-escue Pasture
4.0
Tons
811-7/31
153
0
0
Broad.
153
0.0
35.5
0.0
220.4
19022
1
U28
Cecil
36.0
11.4
mall Crain,
9.8
Tons
' 1011-3/31
109
0
0
Irri .
109
39.6
0.0
453.5
0.0
ila a/Ha
19022
I
U28
Cecil
36.0
11.4
or hum -Sudan t{a
4.3
Tons
•411-8/31
212
0
0
[rri
2E2
77.4
0.0
882.0
0.0
714407 Database Version 1.08 - Date Printed: 1 1-05-2001 WUT Page I

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D. I
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs1A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
I Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
lbs/A
1000
al/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
19022
IA
U28
Cecil
l Grain,
9.8
Tons
*10/1-3/31
109
0
0
lrri
l09
39.8
0.0
250.6
0.0
e/Ha
19022
IA
U28
Cecil
#6.26.2
hum -Sudan Ha
4.3
Tons
*4/1-8/31
212
0
0
1rri .
212
77.4
0.0
487.4
00
19022
1B
U28
Cecil
ll Grain,
9.8
Tons
*10/1-3131
109
0
0
Irri.
109
39.8
0.0
246.6
0.0
a/Ha19022
1B
U28
Cecil
hum -Sudan Hay
4.3
Tons
*411-8/31
212
06
0
Irri .
212
77.4
O-ol
479.7
0.0
igo221
IC
U28
Cecil
6.2
6.2
mall Grain,
9.8
Tons
*10/1-3/31
109
ol
0
Irri .
109
39.8
0.0
246.6
00
a/Ha
19022
!C
U28
Cecil
6.2
hum -Sudan Ha
4.3
Tons
*4/1-8/31
212
0
0
Irri .
212
77.4
0.0
479.7
0.0
19022
1D
U28
Cecil
5.9
$6.2or
ll Grain,
9.8
Tons
*10/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irri .
109
39.8
0.0
234.7
0.0
e./Ha19022
1D
U28
Cecil
5.9
hum -Sudan Ha
4.3
Tons
*4/1-8/31
212
0
0
Irri .
212
77.4
0.0
456.5
0.0
19022
2 Gr
U29
Cecil
8.0
ue Ha
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/3l
195
0
0
Broad.
195
0.0
45.31
0.0
362.4
190221
2 Ev
U29
I Cecil
33.0
33.0
mall Grain,
9.8
Tons
*10/1-3/31
0
0.
0
Broad.
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ila e/Ha
19022
2 Ev
U29
Cecil
33.0
33.0
o beans, Manured,
37.0
Bushels
*5/15-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.0
33.5
0.0
1,103.9
uble Cro
19022
2 Od
U29
Cecil
33.0
33.0
orn, Silage
20.5
Tons
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.0
47.2
0.0
1,556.2
19022
2 Od
U29
Cecil
33.0
33.0
mall Grain.
9.8
'tons
*10/1-3131
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.0
25.3
0.0
835.6
i1a a/Ha
19022
3
U29
Cecil
3.2
3.2
escue Ha
4.2
Tons
811-7131
186
0
0
Broad,
186
0.0
43.2
0.0
138.3
19022
4
U28
Cecil
3.2
3.2
escue Ha
4.2
Tons
8/1-7/31
186
0
0
Broad,
186
253.1
0.0
810.0
0.0
19022
5
U29
Cecil
ITT
17.1
mall Grain,
9.6
Tons
*10/1-3131
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ila a/Ha
19022
5
U29
Cecil
17.1
17.1
o beans, Manured,
37.0
Bushels
*5/15-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.0
33.5
0.0
572.0
uble Cro
190221
6
U29
Cecil
8.1
8.1
lRescuegrass Ha
0-0
Tons
811-7/31
* 191
0
0
Broad.
191
0.0
44.4
0.0
359.4
19022
7
U29
Cecil
12.8
12.9
am, Silage
20.5
Tons
2/15-6130
223
0
20
Broad.
1 203
0.0
47.2
0.0
603.6
19022
7
U29
Cecil
12.8
12.8
'mall Grain,
9.8
Tons
*10l1-3131
109
0
0
Broad.
109
0.0
25.3
0.0
324.1
ila a/Ha
19022
8
L129
Cecil
3.3
3.3
am, Silage
20.5
Tons
2115-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.01
47.21
0.01
155.6
714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 1 1-05-2001 WUT Page 2

0 • •
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
E.D.
Soil Series
Total
I Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(Ibs/A)
I N
Applic.
I Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
t Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
I lbs/A
1000
al/A
tons
1000 gals
tons
19022
8
U29
Cecil
1 3.31
3.3
[Hall Grain,
9-8
Tons
1 *10/1-3/31
1 109
01
0
1 Broa
1 109
0.0
25.3
- 0.0
83.6
'ila e/Ha
Lagoon Liquids
Total Applied, 1000 allons
5,027
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
1,187
Balance 1000 aklons
-3 840
Manure Solids
Total Applied, tons
7,046
Total Produced, tons
850
Balance, tons
-6,196
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol -- means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol ' means user entered data.
714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 1 1-05-2001 WUT Page 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
'tract I
Field
Source
1. D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre 1
Use.
Acres I
Crop
RYE I
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period I
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fen,
Nutrient
Applied
Res,
(lbs/A)
N
Apptic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
.Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N I
Ibs/A I
1000
Ral/A
tons 1
1000 gals
tons
190161
1
U29
Cecil
4.5
4.5
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
147
01
0
Broad.
147
0.0
34.21
0.0
153.7
190161
2
U29
Cecil
1.4
1.4
escue Pasture
4.4
Tons
811-7/31
147
01
0
Broad.
147
0.0
34.2
0.0
47.8
19016
3
U29
Cecil
4.4
4.4
zescue Pasture
4.4
Tons
8/1-7131
147
0
0
Broad.
147
00
34.2
0.0
150.3
19016
4
U29
Cecil
3.0
3.0
escue Pasture
4A
Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.0
34.2
0.0
102.4
19016
5
U24
Cecil
8.1
8.1
Fescue Pasture
4A
Tons
8/1-7/31
147
0
0
Broad.
147
0.0
34.2
0.0
276.6
19016
6
U29
Cecil
6.2
6.2
escue Pasture
4.6
Tons
8/1-7131
153
0
0
Broad.
153
0.0
35.5
0.0
220.4
19022
1
U28
Cecil
36.0
11.4
mall Grain,
9.8
Tons
*1011-3/3)
109
0
0
Irri .
109
39.8
0.0
453.5
0.0
ila a/Ha
19022
1
U28
Cecil
36.0
1 L4
o hum -Sudan Ha
4.3
Tons
0411-8/31
212
0
0
Irri .
212
77.4
0.0
882.0
0.0
19022
IA
U28
Cecil
6.3
6.3
mall Grain,
9.8
Tons
0101E-3/31
109
0
0
Irri .
109
39.8
0.0
250.6
0.0
ila e/Ha
19022
IA
U28
Cecil
6.3
6.3
or hum -Sudan Ha
4.3
Tons
*411-8/31
212
0
0
Irri .
212
77.4
0.0
487.4
0.0
19022
IB
U28
Cecil
6.2
6.2
'mall Grain,
9.8.
Tons
*1011-3/31
109
0
0
Irri .
109
39.8
0.0
246.6
0.0
i!a a/Fla
19022
1B
IJ28
Cecil
6.2
6.2
'or hum -Sudan lla
4.3
Tons
*4/1-8/31
212
0
0
lrri .
212
77.4
0.0
479.7
0.0
19022
IC
IJ28
Cecil
6.2
6.2
=11 Grain,
9.8
Tons
*10/1-3/31
109
0
0
Irri .
109
39.8
0.0
246.6
0.0
ila e/Ha
19022
IC
IJ28
Cecil
6.2
6.2
or hum -Sudan Ha
4.3
Tons
*4/1-8/31
212
0
0
lrri .
212
77.4
0.0
479.7
0.0
19022
1 D
U28
Cecil
5.9
5.9
'mall Grain,
9.8
Tons
*1011-3/31
109
0
0
Irri .
109
39.8
0.0
234.7
0.0
ila c/Ha
l9022
1 D
U28
Cecil
5.9
5.9
or hum -Sudan Ha
4.3
Tons
*4/1-8/31
212
0
0
Irri
212
77A
0.0
456.5
0,0
19022
2 Gr
U29
Cecil
8.0
8.0
escue Ha
-4.4
Tons
8/1-7/31
195
p
0
Broad.
195
0.0
45.3
0.0
362.4
19022
2 Ev
U29
Cecil
33.0
33.0
mall Grain,
9.8
Tons
*10/1-3/31
109
0
0
Rroad.
109
0.0
25.3
0.0
835.6
ila e/Ha
19022
2Ev
U29
Cecil
33.0
33.0
om,Sila a
20.5
Tans
2/15-6/30
223
0
20
Broad.
203
0.0
47.2
0.0
1,536.2
19022
2 Od
U29
Cecil
33.0
33.0
mall Grain,
9.8
Tons
* 1011-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ila eA la
19022
2Od
U29
I Cecil
33.0
33.0
olybeans,Manured,
37.0
Bushels
*5/15-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.0
33.5
0.0
1,103.9
uble Crop
19022
3
U29
Cecil
1 3.2
3.2
escue flay
4.2
Tons
811-7/31
1861
OT
0
Broad.
186
0.01
43.2
0.0
138.3
19022
4
U28
Cecil
321
3.2
escue Hay
4.2
Tons
8/1-7/31
1861
01
0
Broad.
186
253.1
0.01
810.0
0.0
19022
5
U29
Cecil
17.11
17.1
'mall Grain,
26
Tuns
*10/1-3/3!
1 1071
01
0
Broad.
107
0.01
24.9
0.0
425.0
714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 11-05-2001 WUT Page 4

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
liquid
( Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
I Ibs/A
1000
al/A
1 tons
1000 gals
tuns
'ila eltla
190221
5
U29
Cecil
ITT
17A
rn,Silage
20.0
Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
20
Broad.
198
0.0
46.0
0.0
786.5
19022
6
U29
Cecil
8.1
8Ascue
rass Ha
0.0
Tons
8/1-7131
* 191
0
0
Broad.
191
0.0
44A
0.0
359.4
19022
7
U29
Cecil
12.8
12.8all
Grain,
luble
9.8
Tons
*10/1-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
age/Hay
19022
7
U29
Cecil
12.8
12.8
beans, Manured,
37.0
Bushels
*5/15-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.0
33.5
0.0
428.2
Crop
19022
8
U29
Cecil
3.3
3.3
rrtallC,rain,
9.8
Tans
*10/1-3/31
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ila a/Ha
19022
8
U29
Cecil
3.3
3.3
o beans, Manured,
37.0
Bushels
*5/15-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
0.0
33.5
0.0
110.4
uble Crop
1r
Lagoon Liquids
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
5,027
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
1,187
Balance 1000 gallons
3 840
Manure Solids
Total Applied, tons
7,057
Total Produced, tons
850
Balance, tons
6,207
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol -means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
714407 Database Version 1,08 Date Printed: 11-05-2001 WL)T Page 5

. The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils: If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation. system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
19022
l
Cecil
0.40
1.00
19022--
to
Cecil
0.40
1.00
19022
lB
Cecil
0.40
1.00
19022
IC
I Cecil
1 0.401
1.00
19022
1 D I
Cecil
1 0.401
1.00
714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: l 1-05-2001 1AF Page l

i
The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the_number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storajevolume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
Miller Dairy Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
1 9115
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
180
1
2
180
1
3
149
1
4
119
1
5
150
1
6
180
1
7
149
1
8
180
1
9
150
1
10
180
1
11
I80
1
12
149
2
1
118
2
2
152
2
3
121
2
4
91
2
5
122
2
6
180
2
7
149
2
8
180
2
9
150
2
10
180
2
11
180
2 1
12
149
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
40 714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: l 1-05-2001 Capacity Page 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
. historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons'per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 11-05-2001 Specification Page I

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall.not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
• 11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
• 714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: 1 1-05-2001 Specification Page 2

waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where,
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production,at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
• erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and Other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used
on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be' tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: I L-05-2001 Specification Page 3

40
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions
require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a
minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
714407 Database Version 1.08 Date Printed: l 1-05-2001 Specification Page 4

0
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Miller Farm
Address: 3510 Weaver Road, Salisbury, NC 281,
Telephone:
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications 1
County- Rowan,
Date: 11 /1198
Field
Number'
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
of Field
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
%
crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate (Mir)
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
cycle`
(inches) I
Comments
1A
6.3
Cecil
3 to 4
Rye hay and Sudex Hay -No -till
0.4
1
1 B
6.2
Cecil
3 to 4
Rye hay and Sudex Hay No -till
0.4
1
1 C
6.2
Cecil
3 to 4
R e ha and Sudex Hay No -till
0.4
1
1 D
5.9
Cecil
3 to 4
Rye hay and Sudex Hay No -till
0.4
1
Table to be completed in its entirety by soil and water conservation district (SWCD) personnel and forwarded to the irrigation system designer.
2 See attached map provided by the SWCD for field location(s).
3 Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
4 Refer to N.C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section 11G
Irrigation Parameters page-1 USDA-NRCS
September 1995 North Carolina

! 0 •
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and jy2e of Equipment: ABI Model MATE, With 984 ft. 3 inch OD Hose and Nelson 100 Gum
.Effective
Effective
Width (ft) Length (ft)_
Diameter Pressure Pressure
:, :, - ,
See attached map provided by the SWCD for field location(s).
2 Show separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
3 Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
Irrigation Parameters USDA-NRCS
September 1995 page-2 North Carolina

• i i
TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment: NA
OPERATING PARAMETERS
NoWe OpNatuv
Diameler Pressure Operating
�� �■� � � �� ■�■� ■■■ram �� �■■�
See attached map provided by the SWCD for field location(s).
2 Show separate entries for each hydrant location to each field.
Irrigation Parameters USDA-NRCS
September 1995 page-3 North Carolina

0 , •
TABLE 4 - IRRIGATION SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate or S rinlder (gpm)
197
Operating Pressure at Pum psi}
124
Design Precipatation Rate (inlhr)
0.37
hose (feet)
984
XXXXXXXX
T of Speed Compensation
Computer
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Electric
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
30
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications 1
Location
Bend
d End
THRUST BLOCK
Irrigation Parameters USDA-NRCS
September 1995 page-4 North Carolina

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name: HenryR. Johnson, Jr. C.1.D
Company: Johson and Company, Inc
Address: PO Box 122, Advance, NC 27006
Telephone: [phone]
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
The following specifications and computations must accompany all irrigation designs:
1 . A Scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thrust block
locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2 . Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4 . Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
5 . Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks.
6 . Specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-NRCS specification for Irrigation Water Conveyance, Technical Guide,
Section IV, Code 430-DD.
NOTE: A buffer strip 25 feet wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perenial streams and surface
waters per DENR-DEM Code Section 15A NCAC 28 .0200 - Waste Not Discharged to Surface Waters.
Irrigation Parameters page-5 USDA-NRCS
September 1995 North Carolina

0 Miller Farm
Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
A. The operator shall check all drains and valves, prior to start of the
system.
B. Set up traveler at the first hydrant, connect valve opening ELL and 4"
connection hose. Pull out gun cart, but do not pull out more than 950
feet of hose.
C.
Open valve by opening ELL on hydrant.
D.
Override low/high pressure switch, partially open 3" discharge gate
valve, prime and start pump.
E.
Once water begins discharging from the gun sprinkler, slowly open
discharge gate valve, until pressure gauge reads required pressure for
the specific hydrant in use. (Due to elevation and friction loss
differences, pressure at the discharge valve will vary to attain 70 PSI at
the gun and 109 PSI at the traveler connection.)
F.
For equivalent application at the beginning of the travel lane, allow the
gun to discharge for approximately 30 minutes prior to starting travel of
the machine.
G.
Set the traveler computer to 3.3 ft./minimum (0.4" application rate) and
start travel mode.
H. Check the traveler and gun for proper operation, making sure no run off
occurs. Recheck traveler frequently.
1. When traveler reaches end of travel lane, allow an additional 30
minutes, before shutting off pump.
J. Close hydrant and move traveler to next travel lane.
K. Allow 3 days minimum, prior to reapplying wastewater to this area.
L. When irrigation application is complete, open manual drain.
n
LJ

•
•
-mi #.
CATEGORY EXAMPLES ACTION CONTACTS
Obvious Threat
Complete structural failure;
1. If there is any potential threat to life or
Sheriff — 704-638-3000
full or partial loss of a Waste
property, contact 911 or Sheriff's Dept.
Storage Pond wall resulting in a
release of waste
2. Report failure to Division of Water Quality
DWQ at 704-663-1699,
(DWQ) - provide operation name, location,
or Emergency Management at 704-638-
problem, time of spill, phone number for
0911
return calls & registration/certification
number
Local Contractor — L. P. Barger Grading
3. Make all attempts to stop the discharge and
1075 Goodnight Rd.
contain the waste on the farm
Salisbury, NC 28147
704-633-8693
4. Contact the technical specialist who
Tech. Spec. — 704-637-1604 Ext.3
certified the Waste Storage -Pond
Impending Threat
Structural damage from
1. Report failure to DWQ - provide same
DWQ at 704-663-1699
overtopping; leakage or seepage
information as above
or Emergency Management at 704-663-
from base or sidewails of Waste
1699
Storage Pond, waste discharging
from underground tiles
Tech. Spec. — 704-637-1604 Ext. 3
2. Make all attempts to stop the discharge;
Local Contractor — L. P. Barger Grading
Failure to immediately address
reinforce weak area of structure until a
704-633-8693
these may result in complete
technical specialist can assess situation
_
structural failure
Other Discharges
Runoff from spray fields, broken
1. If waste is leaving property use same
Same as for "Impending Threat" category
pipes, leaking pumps, discharges
contacts as for the previous category
from houses and other
maintenance deficiencies
2. Address maintenance deficiencies
Lack of Storage
Anticipated single storm events
1. Contact DWQ for regulatory approval for
DWQ at 704-663-1699
Capacity
exceeding 25 yr.24 hr. frequency
emergency pumping
such as approaching hurricanes;
Or extended rainfall periods
resulting in waste water levels
above the start pump marker

'7.--'�W 2y'�'I'�i�Y�-.� .,.. '� �. c".v"�t..� �ie� ..i:l '1[: �cr"• .i�r- ��,.c(��'- ��I' °; F:,
t�.�"
y
r�%c�...�i�?f"�1.i 1� 7 J-;�4G ^. j'ti .-�i�: 'nc#y�-�.-£ t.; ,t Y" j �.,.t�y �y Asa �-Y",:'?+"��"��i'.E9=.'.�s<��' ?�r._�_�2;�-..�*a�:� {i.��y
§�SS�'i�ti��'.�.-. .�§..,�y�, ��'.•�f
Waste Storage Overflow
Runoff From Waste
Leakage From Waste
Leakage From Base or
Application Field
Sidewall of Storage Pond_—,
soil to berm to increase
Immediately stop waste
--Distribution
Stop recycle (flushing
Dig a small well or ditch to
elevationAdd
of dam
application
pump
catch all seepage, put in
submersible pump, and pump
Pump wastes to fields at an
Create a temporary diversion
Stop irrigation pump
back into Waste Storage Pond
acceptable rate
or berm to contain the waste
on •
Close■ eliminate
If holes` r by
all additional flow to the
further discharge
burrowing animals, trap or
lagoonStop
-
Incorporate • reduce
removeand fill holes
further runoff
Separate pipes to create an
and compact with a clay type
Call _ pumping ! !
•.s and stop flow
soil
Make sure no surface water
Other holes may be likewise
is - - • .!••
•• • !•-s with clay
•

Dairy Farm Waste Management odor Contro i CheMist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production id Vegetative or wooded buffers
Rf Recommended best management practices
EMI Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn • Wet manure -covered 9 Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces (r Promote drying with proper ventilation
9 Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas
• Urine
• Partial microbial
decomposition
EY
I
Promote drying with proper ventilation
Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
Manure dry stacks
• Partial microbial
§r
Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or
• Partial microbial
❑
Bottom or mid -level loading
basin surface
decomposition
❑
Tank covers
* Mixing while filling
❑
Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying
if
Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
Rf
Agitate only prior to manure removal
A
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin Partial microbial C7 Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition ❑ Remove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader Volatile gas emissions r7 Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets I Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page l

i
Dairy Farm waste Management Odor Contra Cheddist
Source
Cause_
_ B_MPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
_
Uncovered manure,
_ T
• Volatile gas emissions while
0
_ _
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on
drying
0
Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces
!f
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks T
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
O
Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling
0
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater Cl Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations
• Agitation during sump tank
filling and drawdown
C1
Sump tank covers
End of drainpipes at
• Agitation during wastewater
0
Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
• Volatile gas emission
0
Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing
0
Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation
0
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
0
Minimum agitation when pumping
O
Mechanical aeration
0 Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation l( Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles • Wind drift P_f Minimum recommended operating procedure
G� Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
C) Pump from second -stage lagoon
F?( Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Dairy Farm waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water + Improper drainage Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities • Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System --Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Available From :
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 3

Insect Control Cheddist for Animal Opmftna
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Svstems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids ® Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
l( Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids N Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation WO Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Svstems
Feeders • Feed spillage IN Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
VClean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to.10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)
AM1C - November 11, 1996, page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause A BMPs to Control: Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed 61 Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
Grp Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas . Accumulations of animal 11 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences T
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
CAI Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed
Dry manure handling . Accumulations of animal Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
L( Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

• Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
C7 Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
0 Complete incineration
Cl In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animars value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
0 December 18, 1996

STATE: NC PROJECT: Miller Farm WSP Design 180 Day Storage _
• BY: 1-ipe Barrier DATE: 10/2501 CHECKED BY: DATE: JOB NO.:
a-,JECT: Design for 200 Dairy Cows 50% confinement and 50% of Waste Stored as a Stu
A. DESIGN VOLUMES
1. Normal Runoff for 366 day period.
Use average runoff values In Ag. Waste Management Field Field Manual for Rowan County
Surface Unsurfaced
Normal Runoff Runoff Normal
IUnMh_ -Rainfall 9i rinnlh % ronth Fvannratian
0
•
~ L
FEB
3.78
55
2.16
25
0.97
1.83
,MAR .
4+Si ..�,•.
.. 5,5..�sd
,� 2`413 : it
s24-,�
APR
3.38
56
1.88
25
0.84
3.65
JUN
4.20
60
2.51
27
1.13
4.75
AUG
3.97
61
2.96
31
1.50
4.38
?.-:l 77"T
: `2 62
:32 gat
c+ice ii?Zir'
., .
3 Zi3'. a<:
OCT
3.21
62
2.13
30
1.03
2.58
WK,i
fi
DEC
1 3.56
57
1 2.117
23
0.87
1.10
Try 6 Months
Oct through Mar :Surface Runoff Depth: 10.48
Drainage Area: 26,136 sgft
Surface Runoff = 10.48 26,136 sgft = 22,82l3 cuft
12"/ft
2. Waste volume
Volume = 200 Cows x 7 gal/dayrcow x 180 days x 50% confinement
7.48 gal /tuft
Volume = 16,848 tuft
3. Wash Water Volume
Parlor and Washroom Water
200 oowe x 5 gailday/cow x 180
4. 25yr - 24hr runoff
C N = 95
Rainfall = 55'
Runoff - 4.91"
25yr - 24hr runoff =
4.91" X 26,136 sqR
12"JR
S. Rainfall rnNnus evaporation on pond surface
Miller Farm WSP 6 Months
days = 24,064 tuft
10,694 Cult
Page 1
a

STATE: NC PROJECT: Miller Farm WSP Design 180 Day Storage
• BY: Li Barrier DATE: IU2501 CHECKED BY: DATE: JOB NO.:
5_ EJECT: Design for 200 Dairy Cows 50% confinement and 50% of Waste Stored as a Slurry
21.82 minus 11.34 equals 10.48 inchesJl2 = 0.9 feet per B Months
6.26yr - 24hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 5.6' = 0.B feet
7. Frealmard + Emergency Spillway stage = 1.2 feet
B. SUMMARY OF DESIGN VOLUMES
1. Surface Runoff for 6 months
22825 cult
2. Waste Volume
16845 tuft
3. Wash Water Volume
24064 cuft
4. 25 yr - 24 hr Runoff
10694 cult
TOTAL
74,429 cult
5. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
0.87 feet
6.25yr - 24hr rainfall on frond surface
0.50 feet
7. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage
1.20 feet
TOTAL
2.6 feet
C. Sizing Waste Storage Ports "AS GUILTS" Volume
. 130 ft X 128 ft top width (to top of dam)
. -
Slope 2.5:1 2.4:1 Slope
Slope :1 93.0 ft X 96.6 ft C mid section 2.1 :1 Slope
IF
69 ft X 74 ft bottom width
Depth Top Bottom Mid Area
Volume = 9.8 16 (( 13705 ) + ( 5106 ) + 4 ( 818" A
Volume = $$,794 cuff Exceeds the 180 days loading
VOLUME NEEDED a 74,429 cult
Normal Pump out Volume =
22,825 + 16,845 +
78,275 cuft per
505,501 gallons per
Maximum Pond Level (Pump -out Elevation) =
0.50 + 1.20 +
2.5 below top of dam
40 7
24,084 + 0.9 x 130
180 days = 15B,725 cult per year
180 days = 1,187,265 gallons per year
10,694 / ( 117 x 117 )
x 128
Miller Farm WSP 6 Months Page 2

STATE: NC PROJECT: Miller Farm Waste Storage Pond Emergency Capacity
. BY: Lipe Barrier DATE: 10I18i01 CHECKED BY: DATE: JOB NO.:
S�.sJECT: Can. Waste Storage Pond Will hold total waste with total conflnernent for 90 days in an emergency_- Capacity is sufficient.
A. DESIGN VOLUMES
1. Normai Runoff for 365 day period.
Use average runoff values In Ag. Waste Management Field Field Manual for Rowan County
Surface Unsurfaced
Normal' Runoff Runoff Normal
unmh ,Rainfall 9f. r]anfh 4L nafoh Fvar nmfinn
}=1 �'ItJA
:.. r-3.7fi,z 'o-.
�
I� �i�C}'rra !��>'.
Z•.8'a h. �
i'{k r1$ %
Sirs. 21,.
:. .7 Yi'_.>i,
1.1. �.
33.�78
56
2.16
0./977
1.83
{F�E�B
Cf �25
{
�u
APR
3.38
56
1.68
25
0.84
3.65~
sx y,
, a6+8v�
4 " ; �:
3
-
; ,
44�g
J1UN
4.2D
60
2.51
27
1.13
4.75
f
i r,-j,'k;4.6t:,L
.P{i_h�gY`"' A
3..5s4<:w'ti:'
y
i.i'A� 4'4
,ry`
�a!i-,A-Iw="rv�a.w.
AUG
3.97
61
Z.95
31
1.5o
4.38
OCT
62
2.13
30
2.56
�v��sf+l0lf
a3.21
2 �4�rn:€'Y
r.y�d �5
��1:GL.. �
� �i�st@.
/1,03
&kL4��..;.�
-7-W��r.:
DEC
3.56
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.10
Try 3 Months
Dec through Feb :Surface Runoff Depth: 6,18
Drainage Area: 26,136 sqft
. Surface Runoff 6.18 26,136 sqft = 13,460 cult
12 1ft
•
2. Waste volume
Volume = 200 cows X 14 gallday/oow X 90 days X 10D% confinement
7.48 gallcuft
Volume = 33 $$0 Chit
3. Wash Water Volume
Parlor and Washroom Water
200 caws X 5 pUdayrcow X 90 days = 12,032 1 cult
4. 25yr - 24hr runoff
CN=95
Rainfall = 5.5"
Runoff = 4.91"
25yr - 24hr runoff = 4.91" X 26,136 sqft = 10,694 Cuft
12"A
6. Rainfail minus evaporation on pond surface
Miller Farm WSP Emergency Capacity Page i

1
S. 26yr - 24hr rainfall on pond surface
Ralnfaa - 5.5" a o.s feet
7. Freeboard + Enrgency Spit" stages+ 1.Z feet
8 SUMMARY OF DESIGN VOLUMES
1, SUM" RUrlo f br 3 montfrs
13460 tuft
2. Waste Volume
33690 tuft
3 Wash Water Volume
12032 c uft
4, 25 yr - 24 hr Runoff
10694 tuft
TOTAL
69$70 CUR
5. Rainfall mtrwa evaporation on pond surface
0.59 feet
5. 25yr - 24hr raWd on pond surface
0.50 reef
7. Freefxwd + Emergency Spiilvvay Stage
1.20 feet
TOTAL
2.3fieet
C. Slzing Waste Storage Pond 'AS SUILTS' Volume
128 ft. X
127 ft top wldlh (to fop of dam)
2.3 '
1
Slope
2.5:1
24:1 slope
Slope
23 :1 93.0 ft X
95.8 R mid sactlon :-: 21.:1 Slope
69 ft X ' 1::.:74
' z:' ft bottom width
Depth Top
SODOM Wd Area
Volume a 9.8 AB [( 13705 }
+ ( 5108 } + 4 ( 8,w )j
VOiume a cult Extends the
90 days loeding
VOLUME NEEDED a 00.876 cult
Normal Pump out Volume a
13,460 + 33,6 C +
• 69,735 cult per
514,13E gallons per
Maximum Pond t avel (Pump -out Elevati)n)
0.50 + 1.20 +
2.5 below top of dam
a,7 Ubz�
12,032 + 0.8 x 129
90 days a 275,75E Cult per year
90 days a 2,065,115 gallons per yew
10,894 I ( 117 x 117 )
x 127
Miller Farm WSP Emergency Cq=Ky Page 2

•
•
U. 'i. OEPAh-.AEW, OP ACk1CJLNJRE
Soil Corserry vcion Service ncv• 7/91
PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE STORAGE PIT
// .11 11
NAM' : leL. aLol Date: /— -7
County:
Address:
/r g
►,
aT"41
LEACTH /
S1 of GLOPEaro I
\ate Lw 1 /
y ar 1 J AYE. 70P ELEV. /O 1
G)on
°^ o -4.3 - 7h
AYE. sor7ou ELEY. /
t_ L£NGTH /
(Sec back for voLume ealcuLW ors)
Use of facility; Est' J a Q- /
Capacity: 'i Gallons / Ft3
Soli Type:
Bench Mark,Descriptzon
Bottom
Normal Liquid Level
Storage for normal Precip.
Maximum Liquid Level
25 yr. Storm Storage
Crest ESW
Max. Floc► Depth
Freeboard
Top of Dam
e , • .•
Elev.
Elev.
(+) ,
Ft.
Elev.
H ,
Elev.
(a-)
Ft.
( �-)
Ft.
Elev.

• VOLM E OF A TRAPEZOIDAL PIT
One equation for calculating the volume of a trapezoidal pit is:
volume - e�th ((area of top) +'(area of"bottom) + ( area
of mi.ds ection) ] _ _ _ , �1� Ft3
�t UL -
�
Another equation for determining the volume of a trapezoidal
excavated pit with constant side slopes is:
V = wd-.T,
+ Zd2(4/3 Zd - w - L)
where.
V
= total volume
of the
pit in
ft3.
w
= width of the
pit at
top in
feet.
d
= depth of the
pit at
top in
feet.
L
= length of the
pit at
top in
feet.
Z
= side slope
for 2 to 1
use Z -
2
for 21/2 to
1 use Z = 21/2
NOTE:
Dimensions used must be constructable. Always -check for narrow,
deep pits. -For correct results the following must be true.
w must be greater than 2Zd
L must be greater than 2Zd
0

i
0
•
SCS-ENC-SJB U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Row. S-M SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
F. I• ' • _
• ■ -ACRES PASTURE ACRES
WOODLAND -ACRES TOTAL ACRES
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (ApMz. amle I" —L:f"t),
Jowta reference pwal in center line of dam and ldenft an skekk
r■r■■■r■■r■■■rr■■■■■■
■m■r
EEN■■E
E■■
■■■■■■■■
r
■rl���r■1r■■rrr■r■■�
■■IM■L!!MI■!�■■■■■■■■■==_
■
■■■■■
■�■���■■rrrr■
■■M■■
■■■
■■�s�■
■■�■■■■■■■■■r��sr�■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Ir■■■■
IN
BORING. PROFILE
SIC
"�`C���I■!■'■■I■■`■�■E■I■'■!■!■I■f■■I■!■I�I■
�C�'m'■I■'■?■
sir
�I■I■f
■I■'■I■
■1■I■'■I■I■i�l■
®�'13�1�1■■��■��■;■!■I■jjII■.'■ICI■i■I■�■�■!■1■11I■
BORINGS MADE BY3•I ;, 14�w.1SIGNATURE & TITLE

0"
TYPES OF MATERIAL. ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Use one of system% below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
USDA CLASSIFICATION
GW-Well graded gravels; gravel, sand mix
g- gravel
GP -Poorly graded gravels
s -sand
GM -Silty gravels: gravel -sand -silt mix
vfs-very fine sand
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix
sl- sandyy loam • -
SW - Well graded sands; sand -gravel mix
fsI -fine sandy loam
SP - Poorly graded sands
1- loam
SM -Silty sand
gl - gravelly loam
SC -Clayey sands: sand -clay mixtures
si-silt
M_L - Silts; silty, v, fine sands; sandy or clayey silt
sit -silt loam
CL-Clays of low to medium plasticity
CI -clay loam
CH - Inorganic clays of high plasticity
sicl -silty clay loam
MH -Elastic silts
sc 1- sandy clay loam
OL-Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
sic -silty clay
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity
c -clay
1. Suitable material for embankment in available (;� Yen O No (Mdi—te -here tmaeoa on th• iketch apt
r.w,re ads)
REMARKS:
2. Explain havards requiring special attention in design rS�eeeae. m+�na.. rvrk efC1
GENERAL REMARKS:
J ¢
24
25
1 26127
28N
29
1.10113111321133 134
351
36 37
38
39,1140
41
42
43
44
1451146
4711
48
49
50
51
I
�
I
I
f
I

!� €,
823,.E
Y.
Topographic leap
Miller Dairy
Facility No. W14
Robert Miller
6..55 Weaver Rd.
v
k: g�, , ; -:'f Salisbury, NC 28147
"x-
pm
77 u,
Aw
�C
� a ffi y
936 p, " k `: �' t � �` 8s
.. ij'!
95.E f,., r•,� '#''�� ! f ' 3� 12 • d �! _��: { .t�_ �.
i
\ 4 f u ) • �
;�-.`TfJ' �^_f €, 'f __ *� A '1 €ry rye \, i ! � iF �` i .J•"q!p %Xt! 03IN
��
"
� • r� k � . �t yf
.•. - ♦E Pik? x s n y
r
° A / '� d .+, .ice �11�e �' 4, �..,,..C_,•..-F
.� �.
f� so�a
3
Ilk
r
iG
!th Rowan
A�
j '� .i+:'.•r�:i" �_# � J� t � " ! . arm _ . rr; .r:�a++z:,aq ♦ • � e --. "`^..�'"�© ° � �i;' �`a }
R �., --♦
r
�fWa r Faflk � "'.�-✓�`' _ ':�,
rl
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
9
Miller Dairy
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following components:
1. WASTE STORAGE PONDS
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM (IRRIGATION)
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
4. VEGETATED BUFFERS AND FILTER AREAS
5. General
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots and barns and stored in a stockpile in the upper lot for up to
90 days. All contaminated water (wash, flush, parlor and runoff) that drains from waste covered concrete
will be collected in WSP. Concrete curbs, collection boxes and piping divert lot runoff into the waste
storage pond. All waste contained in WSP will be land applied at agronomic rates. The WASTE
STORAGE POND is designed to provide 180 days storage for the solid wastes produced by 200 head
milking herd confined 50% of the time. See the Waste Utilization Plan for information on irrigation
design and loading rates.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of Animal Waste
Contaminates to surface waters from the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm, as required
under the Non -discharge regulations.
II

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE
PLAN
-
.0200
Certification
Plan
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store the average lot runoff and wastewater from
the milk barn for a 180-day period. A permanent marker will need to be set indicating the level
of storage available prior to infringing on the 25 year, 24 hour storm capacity. The pond should
be emptied before the level reaches Elevation 93.8 or 2.7 ft. below the planned elevation top 'of
the dam or 1.5 ft. below the spillway elevation. The WASTE STORAGE POND consists of an
earthen dam.
OPERATION
In the WSP will be inspected weekly and current level recorded using installed measuring
marker for reference. As stored slurry nears the maximum operating level plan should be made
for irrigation. It is important to plan ahead to take advantage of good irrigation days.
• MAINTENANCE
Vegetation on the dam should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to maintain a
vigorous stand. The dam should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing
operations must take place only when the soil on the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be
mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches at any time. Any evidence of sloughing or
seepage should be reported to the Rowan Soil & Water Conservation District office. Any trees
or woody growth should be removed by cutting and also removing the stumps and smoothing to
re-establish vegetation. The waste storage pond is fenced out of pasture, but the dam may be
grazed when dry to control vegetation. '
1

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
.0200 Certification
Plan
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
The AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM consists of using the existing irrigation
system. The 0.9-inch nozzle is recommended, Follow the tables in the WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN that identify the application rate and amount.
the slurry delivery source of nutrients to the fields.
conditions are suitable.
OPERATION
System is designed to utilize irrigation as
The system will be used when crop and field
Irrigation operation should be initiated prior to the liquid level reaching the full storage level
marker in the structure. When the liquids level in the WSP reaches the marker, liquids must be
removed by irrigation. The marker elevation is 1.5 feet below the emergency spillway elevation.
is Do not irrigate in such a manner as to cause runoff or erosion. Do not irrigate on frozen or
saturated soils. Irrigate only until soil is near saturation point.
C
The initial step in each irrigation operation is to properly agitate the waste in the Storage Pond.
Consult owner's manuals for equipment used for recommended operational procedures. Waste
will be sampled and tested for nutrient content each time the pond is emptied.
MAINTENANCE
Fields that receive waste application should have soil tested annually. It is recommended that
waste and soil sample results be used in conjunction with each other.
2

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
a I;I'i�I'Ir o '""" !i is t3 x K
.0200 Certi fi cation Plan
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
Contaminated liquids are collected by a system of curbing, catch basins and piping into the WSP.
C$Ja_*N" 9 DWO
Solid waste is scraped and stockpiled in the upper part of the concrete lot. Its drainage is alone
with runoff, and storm water drain to curbs, catch basins and finally into pipe leading to WSP
Guttering is used on the free stall barn to reduce the amount of storm water in the system.
Cattle use the concrete area about 50% of the day, spending the remaining time in the pasture.
0 MAINTENANCE
Inspect the concrete components of the CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or replace as needed.
4. VEGETATED BUFFERS AND FILTER AREAS
OVERVIEW
The VEGETATED BUFFERS serve a two -fold purpose; they filter sediment from exposed
feeding and lounging areas. Their width is based on slope of land and proximity to streams.
These areas can be control grazed or mowed for hay to prevent unwanted growth.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the buffer periodically for sediment accumulation and erosion within the buffer. If
grazing does take place caution should be practiced to prevent overgrazing. Grass should be a
minimum of six (6) inches. These buffers should have at least 80% ground cover. Specified
width of 100 feet must be maintained. Swells or broad based dips will be constructed and
maintained along fence lines to direct water into filters at frequent intervals. See the plan map
for location of the vegetated buffers.

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
5. GENERAL COMMENTS
AGREED TO ITEMS
By signing the Waste Utilization Plan the landowner agrees to apply the collected waste
according to the terms of this agreement. Waste samples will be collected, and test result used
for record keeping and management of the farms cropland.
�► PESTICIDE USE
Y
M
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides so that desirable vegetation is not
adversely affected. It is a violation of law to use any pesticide in a manner not permitted by its
labeling.
REPAIRS
Notify the Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District at 704-637-1604, Ext 3 if repairs or
• major modifications are required for any of the components of this Waste Management System. .
s'
44T'
1�
1�
r
w
h
i
r
�5
4

' ! T
Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
Please type or print all information that does not require a signature
Existing or New _ or _ Exp
General Information:
Name of Farm: Miller Farm
Owner(s) Name:
Mailing Address
Farm Location:
Robert Miller
5 Weaver Road
circle one)
Facility No:'W _ f14 !i C,d
Phone No: 704 c4 7-303'1,' _, O4,
er
urv. NC 2
County Farm is located in:
Latitude and Longitude: _,i _36 /. __31L Integrator, 0A�_
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): Travel West from China Grove, NC on NC 152 to Miller.
_Turn right and head North for 2 miles to Weaver Rd., turn left: and go } mile to
farm on right Ride
Operation Descriotion:
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Tvpe of Cattle No. of Animals
© Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy 200
O Feeder to Finish O Pullets ❑ Beef
D Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
• Farrow to Finish Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
• Gilts
Cl Boars
Expanding Operation Only
Previous Design Capacity: Additional Design Capacity: Total Design Capacity:
Acreage Available for Application: 210 Required Acreage: 48 _
Number of Lagoons I Storage Ponds : 1 Total Capacity: 88.713 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner 1 Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District, I (we) know that any modification must
be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A
change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed)
within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner :_,Robert_ Mille
Signature:
Name of ivianager(if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC -- August I, 1997
Date: 1� ���
Date:

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
• NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
•
d
H. Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
❑ New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Line Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation_ NC-DENR, DSWC -_ _ Date Work Completed: 11-6-2001
Address (Agency). 444 Bristol Drive, Statesville,NC 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-67/61
Signature:g,xt- ,C % Date: %/i /
B) Land Application_ Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lie Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation NC-DENR, _DSWC Date Work Completed: 11-6-2001
Address (Agenc ):444 Bristol Drive Statesville NC 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-6761
Signature: �- 6x, ,� -e,-A" 12 Date: // 7yi
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
`7 Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
❑ Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by MRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lipe Barrier, Jr. _
Affiliation NC-DENR. DSWC Date Work Completed: 11-6-2001
Address (Agency): 444 Bristol Drive Statesville NC 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-6761
Signature: t ,�'_ij I I .. Date: - %i Z d
AWC -- August 1, 1997 '+ 2

C
D). Application and Ilandlinp_ Equipment Non Irrigation
Check the appropriate box
D Existing or -expanding facility with existing waste application a ui ment (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
C1 New, expanded. -or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for spray irrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
9 New, expanded, or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for land spreading not usin
soray irrigation, (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_C. Lipe _Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation NC—DENR, DSWC _ Date Work Completed: 11-6-2Q01
Address (Agen
Signature:
• E) Odor (
SL WUP, RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan.. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lipe Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation NC-I)ENH, I)SWC _^,,,,,,,, _,.,,, Date Work Completed: _i1-B-2onl
Address (Agency): 444 B'risto Drive, Statesville, NC 28.6.77 Phone No.: 704-873-6761
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to.be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805..A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
• Signature:
AWC -- August 1, 1997
Date:
Date:

D� A2911cAdan djLandiinit Eu uiR I r >: i g a t i on Only
. Chick rkt appropriate bas
Z ZxiViag aj e,aWdjnt :hciis ,X i �r-wmstc annikatiX c_Q�menc (Nht? or I;
Animal wuta applicatln equipmcat spedded is the plan has bow either fi_;d calibrai;al cr e+n tua:dd in
accordance with eadrtiaa design charts and "t3 and is abia to appty wam u ncc+esa>s<ry w aecornrmxa ue tic
weYtc massxgerttcrit plan. (existing applicatioa equ4mew atn cover tht uu requited by the ON at rssca not to
excrud either the spet:ttled hydraulic or nutriw 1oe4W wm a sehodtilt: for.dming of applieattms hat► oaei
ratsblia�ed; required buf%rs oain be maintaUted and calibration and adjuttmenr guiWC3 are, contained as pert cf
the plan).
•
or exis
= MLityxi%lIX 2MM 02liad M JUkmollr LI}
Animal waste application otiaipu mit 9pw.&d in the plea bas heart derigned to apply waste 66 necessary to
accoasmodatc dtc -anise rrtastsgat►tsst plan; (proposed apyliUWM equiptaertt can cover the arm required by the
p;an st rain not tp txcecd either tho specified hydraulic or nutmeat ;osding rstts►; it snheduk for timing of
appliciiions his been cstabjbg r4 required buffers can be maintained; calibration and e4jusanent tu: uce arc
contained as pest. of the plan).
New of aptiftingt OxWnst
it o (WUP w t)
Animal waste appt;easiax 0gGipwM1 rpecited In the pian lest boars selected to al;piy wtttme a3 necessary to
zc:ornrnadate the waste imnaptumt piaa: (ptqpmwd application cquiptrwnt can cover the area required by rho
glaze at rates rKt to mum either the gxwAfied hydraulic or mwnimt leading raw; a =bedLk rot timinit of
applicsttons his beta estaNictaodi required buffos =a be maintained; calibration and adjusment gttidancc its
contained as part of rho play). _
'Name of Technical Speciatiet (Pteose Print):
A.ffxiiation l'" iQP&` to Work Completoti: `_ Q
Add=
No.: Yw — z__ rc --2-A
E} QjQr C2j§:JLjg1MLC*nftL1MerWitv Managempt lied EMtraacyP
91a MLLT, M or_ 1) _
The west* massagtatac r ptan for this Facility inet.tdes a writs Minag=cm Odor Control ChvGlclist, An InScot
Contra! Chcseteltst, a Marmlity Maasgatae+nt chooltliat and eat Emergency Actim Plan. Sources of both odo.,s and
irxcts have boar crnsluned with aspect W thin aim and Bcst Mmagerdtw Practioes to Minlmi= Odors Lad 9:at
Man:wammt Fraaicae to Conaol laseca have be= idefted and included itt the waste man2gexn s t Dian. Beth the
Mortality M,anagment P14a and the Emwgcarcy Acrim Flap are cotnptcie aad urn lm iroplarnanted by this Cacility,
Name of TwAstical SpteclaHst (Please Print).
Af5hation Dote Work Completed:
Aiddress (Agency): Phone No.:
5igrlartuc: Date:
)F) Writtelt N Otte -cot New Im ►Mete
The iollowleg ¢grnat:ws Stock Is only to be aced for new ar escpastitaag swine farms that been wastsucdoa afar .luxe
21. 1 M if the faci4ry was built before June 21, M6, whoa wu it ceMrtamd Cr last e=pataad _
I (wo) cer i:y that I iwa) have attempted to oontad by cemfird mail ail adjoining property a" us and all propwty awncrs
whp ,7wn property treated sacn a pubiia road, Sevet, cr highway lrortt W3 now oc cgxnding swine slum. The notice was
in aotnpharwc w%th Ae roquiremanu of NCGS 106-805, A copy of rite notice and a list ot'the proprtly owma3 aatif ed i t
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
. [Vaasa of Musser (if dit%r+ent £torn owner):
Signature; Data-
AwC — August 1. 1997

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection Storage, Treatment Installation
• New, expanded or retrofitted facilit (Sl)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): NA
Affiliation
Address (Agency):
Signature:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
Date Work Completed:
Phone No.:
ate:
Z The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
Q Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lipe Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation NC-DENR . DSWC_ . Date Work Completed: __ 11-6-2001
Address (Agency): 444 Bristol Drive Statesville NC 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-6761
Signature: C7 1,Z , __Ulz .;/ Date: d
This following signature block is only to 6k used when the box for conditional approval in Ill. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion From a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement
action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner: NA
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC -- August 1, 1997
4
Date:
Date:

•
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lie Barrier Jr.
Affiliation _NC-DENR._DSWC _ _ Date Work Completed: ii-62noi
Address (Agency): 444 Bristol Drive, Statesville, NC 28677 Phone No.: 704- 73-6761
Signature: Z Date:
D) Application_ and Handling Eguipmeift installation (WUP or I)
Check -the appropriate block
121 Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with
the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to
the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C . Lie Barrier, J
Affiliation NC-DENR DSWC Date Work Completed: 11-6-2001
Address (Agenc : 4 Phone No.: 704,823-6761
Signature: Date: / Cr
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
NA
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner
Date:
Date:
E) Odor Control Insect Control and Mortality Management SD SI WUP RC or I
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The mortality
management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C, Lipe Barrier. Jr.
Affiliation NC-DENR, DSWC Date Work Completed: 11-6-2001
Address (Agency): 444 Br
Signature:
AWC -- August 1, 1997
�iL�u.e I
1
ie No.: 704-87 -67 1
: %�,/�!

w T It
C) Rw 4,ff CaagStols-from, ExIntraar Lots ;RC)
FaAu vwiira�wnor log
• Methods to minimi= d= run ctTQf;olluanb treat I=cias and hoary use arms have been 1116miled as
in the plan.
,For facllides wirkaut anterior fora. no crrd lcedon is necessary.
14une of Technical SpecUHA (Please Print):
rvzd
Af�iatan Date Work C=pleted:
Ad4b= (Agency); Phone Na.:
Signature: Date:
D) AggLicat on,and $AUUj!L gWgmt nt tnttellatign, (WUp or 1) \
Chwic the �propr' to block irrigation on Z y
Animal waste 3pptbmtton aad handilag equipntcut�od in that: plat is as site and FUdY Fos use;
=:;oration crud adjwtmettt taat�ula have been provi to the owners tad are aontairrd as par of the plain.
Animal wools application and han4liag equipment spctw'Sed in the PISA i+as not been LU4 144 but the owner .
hu proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed amftsct; squipmer;t specifte in
the cvntrrat agtuv with the rcgw:wA=ts of the plan; required buff6va an be maintsituc; calibradan sad
ad)uument guidame have been provided to the owners and are contained at pzK of the plan.
`zl Canditlonai approved: Animal wsine application and handling ecluipaxmt peeitfed in Cho plan has been
purch=d arzd win be on silt and iavwa lod by taolaWday✓YtU): *ere is XtQuatr storage to
hold the v4m mil d1c equipment is installed and until the waste caa be land applied in aceordsnce with
the cropping "arn cow -tined in the plan; and calibraWw and ad ustutsnt guidance have pool mvided to
the o-Txrs anC are ocmtatnod ea pert of the -plan.
Name of Technical Spt4allst (Pleasa. Print):
work
Ad& -Ms kA
TIte fvllovriug sl ntxtre >b1�'e>K is only to be
'j"d When the boat for conditional approval in lu D
above has boon checked
r (wt) rerdty this i (we) h2ve C=Mnittod to purchase the aaimil wute appii=4= and handling equipment as
spaeified in my (cut) Ott =Lnaecme at plat, Sad wilt arty;[ to DEM a ve ifi:a don of ddivaey and bmml lat:i on
from a Toehnical 5pe6alist within 15 =180du days Montag the dote spwrified in the cetadidonal ocrtitficrs:,a:, I
twc) ruli; a that failure to submit this vtrifiCatiaa is a vioWam of the waste managernettt plan and will sub,'crt did
(us) to an enforcement action 5rorta MA
Name of Land Owner: --. ---
Signature. DA,tC:
'Sams of Maunger (if differ mr from owner):
Signature- Date: _
E) O ar Control, insect ContTal and ILmIakly Manjggilat (S% Sk _Ij
Methods to eoaaol odors and insects as spaaified in the Platt; have been installed ;nd are operanonal, Tho mortality
rnanaeumau syswm as specified in the Prlan has also berm installed and is operadmal.
!Name of Tcclenical specialist (Please ?rint);
A fibr-on Date Work Coatpleted:_�_
Addrims (Agency): Phase Na :
AWC — Aagast 1,1991

f ' Farm Site Ma
., p
r1 Miller D
r F airy
Facility No. 80- 14
Robert Miller
•r655 Weaver Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
i I 1 84,1
i s r JLV 1~' — `A.. AV
5 VVvi- )ii195,3
5.3
i
� l t
f
Ibb

Miller Farm irrigation Detail Sheet Page 4
L LE G, F .11)
2 -T NC 704-85 7-9
pprIjEc 1 Na.887
T ­
R A'/ELEIR • DAIRY WAS EVVAT E K UIN
i;
G*k2N & CART
HYDPANT MILLER DAIRY
6" C.I. ;SOLA-110N E'kF. R NO.
2- " MANUAL D P A I ROBERT MILLER
2" AIR RELE-4-SE'
RD
67. PVC MAINLiNE
Zoo'-
TR A'IEL i AN E
SPOT ELE'V'A 7ON D4 TE
J O H N S O N COMPANY, IN(.-. 111-23-98
,
BUFFER BU F—FE.R DRUN BY
IRRIGATION SALES H.R.J.
F;ELD BORDER APPROVED BY:
STREAM
SPRINKLER & DRIP IRRIGATION SPECIALISTS H.P.J.
<
LAVED ROAD A�c
BOX 95F-L-)621
NUM3L-Rs
ADVANCE, N.C. T006 N (SCON
FENCE LINE 7OF
T1

Miller Farm Irrigation Detail Sheet Page 3
ICI0Tt C:
1. P.GA.IDS, �'IE_-D BORDERS, ^cUILD:NGS, AND STREAMS ARE LCCA - tD FROM AIREAL PHOTO'.
2. ELEVA70NS ARE ;NTERPETED FROM USGS TOPC MAPS.
3. SYSTEM Dc S;GW CRITERION: (PRO`J!DED SY ROWAN SWCD
A. 150 COW DA;RY OPERA110N
B. WASTE FROM FREESTALL AREA .AND A&C.ESS ALLEYS 'A7LL BE SCRAPED
AND STORED ON LGT AND LAND APPLIED.
C. RUNOFF FROM BARNS AND LOAF'NG I.OT SHALL BE STOPE D #N A
90 BAY WAKE STORAGE POND. THE CA.PAC'7'�_ OF THE POND IS
60,336 CJ. FT. (451,313 GALLONS.)
D. ?1,F 90 DAY PAN !S 750 LBS-, TN S IS APX. 1.7 LBS/100C GALLONS.
ANNUAL PAN IS F.QUAL TO 7753 LBS.
E. CROPS TO BF IRR:GA.TED INCLUDE: CORN SILAGE, WHEAT, AND
SOYBEANS. THE CROP ROTATION 'M:.ri THE LEAST REQUIRED N
',HELL USE 186 LBS. N/ACRE. THEREFORE M;NIN;JM EFFECTIVE
IRR!GATE-D AREA ;S 12.1 ACRES—
F. SOIL TYPE IS CEC!L 82, MAXIMUM PRECiP!TA70N RA E IS .4",'HR.
4. SYSTEM DESGN:
A. iF..RGA.-,CN SYSTEM ;S vESGI-,ED IJS:NG AN ADD 9CA7C984 TRAVELER
THE TRAV_--L HAS 98N OF 3" HOSE AND ':S POW RED BY A 5 HP
irJNDA ENG;NE. TRAVEL SPEED SHALL COVPENSA`10!; SHALL 9t--
MONI T ORED 'h17H A. ON BOARD COMPUTER.
ER.
B. -PA'-,FL S.-:ALL HAVE A NELSO.Id , O0 GUN A. .9" i APER BORE
NCZ:EL. GJ`,; SHALL CISCHARGE 197 GPM 0 70 PSI '-M? H .A 3' C'
DIAMETf R OF T'- ROW.
0. SPACING 67WEEN TRAVEL LANES SHALL BE 240', G;V'N1G AN APX.
PRE:CiPITAT!ON RATE GF- :
96-25q 36C 96.25� 19T 36C
55 j 30C
;t = APX. ��;?!T�?TO�i CRATE
= D'SC IAGGE ;GP'�l;.
PCFTIC'N C= CPCL-F RE VE_ `✓ING 'XA7E:R
- y'ETTED RADA S
D. TIC PUMP SHALL BE A BERK'LEY B21/200-30HP-24Cv-3PH
CAPABLE OF ::SCHA.RG;NG COI✓' GPM 2 300 TLH.
E. THE PUMP SHAL i HAVE A '-OW HIGH PRESSURE SHUTDOWN SVJITCH,
"rIiICH Sh*.A.LL SHUT DOWN TIE PUMP DUE 70 A. L ,SS 1F ;'RIME_,
- A RRF- BREAK, -OR- - THE GUI NOZ.ir!_-CL OGS.
F . P'P=- SHA'_: BE CL205 ;SDR- 1;' 11.20 P-,'C WITH A N1IN. CC`,f:-R OF 24"
G. ALL i T-DR,=.N TS SHALT BE LOCAAD : j-TDE THE CULT VAND ARFA r F
PC .AIR RELIEF VALA SHAD. BE PLACED 3N CREST 0? RISE ;i-� P;PING, DRAIN
SHALL BE LOC.ATcL AT THE L��W POINT OF THE SYSTEM,
L ALL BUR!r a �;f' :�u F.�:D RT i NGS SHAL - BE THRUST SLOCr'ED AS PER
DETAIL C .
5. OPFR ATION:
A. _HE. CPERATOR SHALL CI'IE`_K ALL DRAINS ANP VA 4TS PTOR TO START
OF TiIF SYSTEM.
!B. EFT jP `"RAWEL_ER AT RRST HY:�F 4NT, r,-..',,N CT V.-St_'ti'E OPf-N1 !G ELL
AND 4" CONNEC7;0I`j HOSI=. PULL GUT GUN CART, PC NOT PULL OUT
MORE THAN 950'-
C. OPEN' V,.! `:';- OF'F`r:VG ELL CN HYDRANT.
PRESSURE SWICH, PArRVA.L0 OPEN 3" D;SCHARGE
GA T F V 4' `'c PR!MF AND STAFT~ PU'AP.
L ONCE ', AAR SEGES DISCHA- GIT FROM GUN SPRN k1F.F SLCAVY GP LN
ISCI- ARCF ;SATE `.'ALVt 114 TIL PRESSURRE. GAUGE READS REQUIRED
PRE SEURE FOR SPECIFIC H'r'DRAN7 IN USE. (DUE TG ELEVATION AND
FRCT+ON 'LOSS DIFFERENCES, PRESSURE AT THE DISCHARGE VALVE WILL
'VARY 70 .ATTAIN '0 PSI AT GUN AND, 109 PSI AT TRAVELER CONNECTION.
F . F�-)R EQU#V„L%N I APPL;CA.TION AT THE BEGINNING OF THE TRAVE! LANE,
ALLOW GJN' TO DISCHARGE FOR APX. 30 M;N. PRIOR TO STARTING
TRAVEL OF MACHINF.
G. SET TRAVFLCR COMPUTER 10 13 FT./ -'MIN. (.4" r:PPL ICATION RATE) AND
ST.ART TRAVEL MOz�E.
H. CHECK THE TRA47LER AND GUN FOR 'ROPER OPFRATION, MAKING S.'-;RE
NO RUN CFF OCCUR& RECHECK TRAZI ER FREQUENTLY !!
f. WHEN TRA'.ELER PEACHES END OF TRAVFL LANE, ALLOW AN ADDITICNAL
30 MI!-,. BEFORE SMUTTING OFF PUMP.
J. CLuSE H'CLRAtiT AND MOUE TR.=.VELER TO NEXT TPn`.EL LANE.
K. ALLOW 3 DA.YS MINIMUM PRIOR TO REAPPL'r1NG WASTERWATER TO ARE-.
L. WHEN IRR;GATION APPLICATION IS COMPI E : E-, OPEN MANUAL DRAIN.
6. IrRRIGA TIDti SHALL ?�vT 3E PERFORMED JKDER THF. FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. DUR:NG RA!NFALL CJR WHEN SOILS ARE SATURATED.
B- MIEN SU!L A F-RCZFN.
C. 'KHEN WlriD SPEEDS EXCEED -,,G mPrj
7. APPLICATION •DF WASTE SHALL BE I !MiTED TO NPCS APPROVED '•jUTR;ENT 10AD%TG
LEVELS ANC, SHALL NOT CAUSE RUN-CFF FROM 711E SO! SURF.AC1
6. VAIER!AL SJPPi ERS SHALL 'WARR N;Y MA, TLRALS PURCHASED FOR A PE%CD OF
GNE YEAR FROM DATE OF PURCHASE.
! ! f

Pi
Fu
G.
LAKE
R
1 -AN F' (TRAVEL SPEED = 3.3
RAVEL E F F E- C I I E E7F-L,-7vE E:FTEC7','E N
SANE j LENG -;H IX, D T" IRRIGATED .,'OURS
ACRES
41 A
-951),
"'22,
24
6.3 4C.
5.8 HR. 6 8, 5 o o ;,kL 6 LBS
.5
H2 9
I 950'
122'
2 0'
6.2 AC.
5.5 HIR.T68.500 GAL
116-5 I -Bs,
H.3 C
950' j
1122'
24-0, j
6.2 AC.
15.5 HR. i 60,500 Gk-
116.5 L.BS.
H4 I D
880'
052'
244'
5.9 AC.
5.4 HR. i 64,43O GAL-
109.5 LB&
14'07-: ALLOW 30 MiM, AT START AND END OF TRA'A-L
LANE FOR EQUVAL ENT APPLICATION RATE
Miller Farm IrrigatiOn Detail Sheet Page 2
dTE PLAN"
IL

Miller Farm irrigation Detail Sheet Page I
-W
I
b
IJ
�Jy A
W;,S—;:: ^IER
/--DRY STACrK
HOLD HOLG
POND --_j
ELV- M
6; QL -
2' AA RELIEF S'L 0 0--
a HIGH. PO:MT
',I,',, -BORE LINDER
Cf OPDF---R
ELV. 820
--HYDRANT
ELV. 310
G
ELV. 510
�HYDRAN,
CLV. JOIN
f p?A
-Ln-
2 Df;'Alt+—
rn
H
El Boa
wo
4-
Scale I inch = 200 feet

6
Farm Site Map
Miller Dairy
Facility No. 80-14
Robert Miller
655 Weaver Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
)0
9 If-V
jet 46 1,
15,3
IL)
vL
<
)A
INI 64
/66

6
Farm Site Map
Miller Dairy
Facility No. 80-14
Robert Miller
655 Weaver Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
tlr
OVA
..... .....
lk
bo�'J' 'd ii
5,3 VA T :d-p
eDIC
48
L30L,
.zr/ If
. A

Miller Farm Irrigation Detail Sheet Page 4
w
PUMP
RAVE LEER
GUN & CART
HYDRANT
6" C.;. ;S !_A70N VALi %V'E
2" MANUAL DRAIN
2" AIR PELEA.SE
6" PVC MAINLiNE
TPAVEL € ANE
SPOT ELEVATION
SUFFER.
F;ELD BORDER
STREAM
PAVED ROAD
' FErJCE LINE
LEGEND
■ PROJECT 140. -
PROjEST TELEPHONE NO,
704-857-9887
■
DAIRY WASTEWATER IRRIGATION
MILLER DAIRY
E4NER T==pHnNE No,
--
ROBERT MILLER
j
ROWAN niNTY, N , � .
SCALE:
a
•
n
— '
MS.„20
JOHNSON & COMPANY, INC.
DATE:
.200'
�1-23-98
auF t #
IRRIGATION SALES
DRAWN BY[
;
H.R.J. ;
APPROVED
$Y:
SPRINKLER & DRIP IRRIGATION SPECIALISTS
H R J
------ -_
P.D. BOX 122'9119) 558-b21
DRAVING NUMBER,
ADVANCE, N.+. ?lOfl.0- esco, 222-2691
OF 2
a
1
It

0
;0
0
/9t
1yL06
Farm Site Map
Miller Dairy
Facility No. 80-14
Robert Miller
655 Weaver Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
LI
5.3
I Pol
Aa L3a i, o-
N;iF
Ap
16

X
- r J
LAKE
4
� i 1
IRA I.LLR PERv-ORIYIY.NCE CHAR l
I HYDRANT
TRAVEL
A' APPLtCAT:ON
RATE
LANE
(TRAVEL SPEED = 3.3 1=T.1/M-1N,
TRAVEL
EFFECTIVE
EMECTIVE
EFFECT.b'E
RUN'
C A110N5
r— B —
:. N
LANE
LENGTH
WDTH
IRRIGATED
HOURS
�
r
DISTANCE
ACRES
H1
A
950'
1122'
244'
6-3 AC.
5.8 HR.
68,500 vAL
� 116.5 LBS.
H2
B
950'
1122'
240'
6.2 AC.
5.8 HR,
68.500 GAL-
116.5
H3
C
950'
1122'
240'
6.2 AC.
5.8 FIR.
68,500 GA
116.5 LBS.
H4
D
880'
1052'
244'
5.9 AC.
5.4 MR.
64,400 GAS-
109.5 LBS.
NOTE: ALLOW 30 MIDI. AT START AND END OF TRAVEL
LANE FOP. EQUVILENT APPLICATION RATE
Miller Farm Irrigation Detail Sheet Page 2
FFE PLAN

Miller Farm irrigation Detail Sheet Page I
0
E
f
ELV. M 0
ElV. OW
rn ti
3.
Y ter.
ti
PUUP '-rCA7!CN
wp S-C-WATER
/-DPY STACK
L ,IOL: )'.NG __ p

Miller Farm Irrigation Detail Sheet Page 3
NC1TC s:
1. P.GA;:S, r[ELD. BORDERS, BUILDINGS, AND STREAMS ARE LOCATED FROM AIREAL PHOTO.
5. GPF'�AT!1_/
2. ELE'JA;.ONS ;,RE ;NTERPETED FROM USGS TOPO MAPS.
.4. -HE GPER%=.T'_"P SHALL CHECK ALL DRAWS ;,Kj" VAL'vFS P-,R!GR TO START
OF THE SYSTEM,
3. SYS T I M DES:GN CR;TERION: (PRO'ADED BY ROWAN SWCD;'
B. Sl-T `�F~ T?A','Ei.ER AT FIRST 1 '?'CFI �+.N T, r r:i:,"DEC T ';'.a;_'ti''[= OPFfd!NG ELL
A. 150 COW DA;RY OPERA110N
�, ,� �, :, i +
AND 4" �JNNEC , O,J HOSE. P4_L_ OUT C,t;.� CART, ,suT PULL OUT
B. WASTE FROM FREESTALL AREA AND ACCESS ALL= YS W!LL BE SCRAPED
MORE THAN 950'.
AND STORED ON _'G ,r AND J_ti''L"n APPLIED.
C. G�1=N '�r.! t"r: OPF`:',�G EI�L Cfv F�YDRA!�T.
C. RUNOFF FROM BARNS AND,LOAF!NG i -OT SHALL 8E STORED IN
"
-D. -,,7', E.RRIDE- '...' k./H':GH PRESSURE S'NIICH, PAR IAL'__r OPEN 3 D:SCHArRGE
90 C-AY WASTE STORAGE POND. THE CAPAC,r-y OF THE POND IS
GATE .'L.L`.`E, PRIt,1E AND START PUMP.
60,335 CU. FT. (451,313 GALLONS.)
r^ ` `„A_�� BILGINIS DISCHAR "ING "IRO.. '!_JN SPR.,.h.Lr.R, SLL'rti" OPLN
D. THE- 90 DAY PAN `.S 750 LBS., 7KS IS ARX. 1.7 LBS/10CC GALLONS.
DISCH?.RGF ;�kTC '.'AL VE UIYTIL ref?# 55URE GAUGE READS REQUIRED
ANNUAL PAN IS r.QUAL TO 2250 LBS.
PR= S5i1RL FOR SPECIFIC HYDRANT IN LSE. (DUE TO ELEVATION AND
E. CROPS TO BF [F?R;GATE"D INCLUDE: CORN SILAGE, WHEAT, AND
F•RZINON LOSS DIFFERENCES,- PRESSURE AT THE DISCHARGE VALVE WILL
SOYBEANS. THE CROP RO T AT1014 W17ri THE LEAST REQUIRED N
VARY TO 70 PSI ATGUN.. AND 1,09 PSI AT TRAVELER CONNECTION.
'MLL USE 186 LBS. N/ACRE. 7HEREFORE MiNIN'UM E:FFEC1,1VE
.ATTAIN
�. F aP. EQU±VA[_%NT A.pPL:CA.TION AT: THE. BEGINNING OF THE TRAVEL LANE,
IRR;GATED AREA :S 12.1 A' "
ALLOW GUN' TO DISCHARGE FOR APX. 30 MIN. PRIOR TO STARTING
F. SOI' TYPE ;S CEC'L BL, MAXIMUM PRE-IPITA70N RATE IS .4"/`HR.
'RAVEL OF MACHIrJF .
4. S''STEM DESIGN:
G. SET TRAVELER COMPUTER TO 3.3 FT./MIN. (.4" APP[_IC'AT!Oty RATE) AND
A. iPR;GA ON SYSTEM IS DES;GNED LS:NG AN A31 9CA7984 TRAVELER
START TRAVEL MOf E.
11-1= TRAVEL FA%S 984' OF 3" HOSE AND '.S PON'FRED BY A 5 HP
H. CHECK TIT E TRA`rc=.LER AND GUN t;JR PROPER OPERATION, MAKING SURE
HONDA ENG;I,'E. TRAVEL SPFE.D SHALL C0NPENSAT40'J SEAL L g=
NO RUN OFF OCCURS. RECHECK-�AVEi.ER FREQUENTLY !!
'WHEN
MONITORED 'h1 ='H A. ON BOARD COMPUTER
1.WHEN TRAVELER REACHES END OF TRAV[=L LANE, ALLOW AN ADDITIONAL
B. TP.A%fEL SHALL ;H€A'A A NELSON' ;00 GUN "All-'. A .9" TAPER BORE.
30 MIN, BEFORE SHUTTING OF` P6VP.
NOZ:EL. G:JN SHALL DISCHARGE 197 GPM ® 70 PSI �W-111H A 3'0'
J. CLOSL HYDRAN'T AND MOVE TRAVELER TO NEXT TRAVEL LANE.
")1AMETER OF 7HROW. I-
K. ALLOW 3 DAYS 1*AINIMUIv€ PRIOR TO REAPP'L'r1NG WAS7,RWATER TO AREA.
C. SPA.CING BETWEEN TRAVEL LANES SHALL BE 240', AN APX.
L WHEN IRR:GnTION APPLICATION 1S.COMPLETr_, OPEN MANUAL DRAIN.
PRE IP:TAT;ON RA-E OF :
6. 1RR1UA j!9NI SHALL NOT BE PERFORL47-D Ur.'D;R THF. FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
96.25c; 360 _ _96.25(19 j 36_G_ ^
t X LR.
A. DURING RAINFALL, OR WHEN SOILS ARE SATURA I'ED.
.37",';
.� ' 3.14( �' SS 30C
9. , w . �l1
I r�
B_ W6IEN SU.L i5 RCZEN.
-
C. WHEN WIND SPEEDS EXCEED 10 MPH
it = APX. .AT]ON RA-E
7. APPLICATION OF WASTE SHALL BE 1 €MiTED TO NPCS APPROVED INUTRiENT I. LADING
c D SC;ARGE ;GPI ;
LEVELS ANG SHALL NG1 CA' -'SE RUN-OFF FROM THE SO:;_ SURFACE.
w - PORTCN .^= C!RCLE RECEi'JING 'NA TER (iEGP-=S
8. NA.=,1,=R!AL S�:Pr�i.!FRS SH��LL '�JnRRA.�J t�1A.TER;I- _3 PURCHASE` FOR A PER:CD OF
WE'~ED R.= ';L S
GIBE YEAR FRC+M DATC OF PURCHASE.
D. THE PUMP SHALL BE A BEPKLEY B21,%2-PLS-30HP-i4Cv-3PH
CAPABLE OF D:SCH.=.RG;NG ` 00 GPM 0 300 14H.
E. THE PUMP SHALi HAVE A L GW,.'HIGH PRESSURE SHUTT)OW!ti SWITCH,
:;`HIC -i S1 A.LL SHUT DOWN THE PUMP DUE 70 A LOSS OF PRIME,
A PIPE BPEAK, OR THE GUN NOZZEI, CLGGS.
F. P!E'Z- SHALT BE CL20:, (SDR--d 1 *, 1120 PVC, Wi TH A MIN`. CC ,fFR OF 24". ,
G. ALL ;Li fDRANTS SHALL BE LOC.' TED '13: "'SIDE T-IE CULTIVATED AREA GF
T.HF FIE',-C.
H. AIR ?EL'EF SHALT. BE PLACED vN CR1:S7 OF RISC ii P;PiNDIRA.1N
SMALL BE L OC.A"ED AT THE L3W POINT OF THE 1YSTEM.
,
1. AL! 3URii=D �'P:NG Ar:D Fil T;NGS SI-iAL L BE THRUST SLOCKE.D AS PER
DETAIL "C"_
I � '