800001_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
February 14, 2018
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
NC Dept of Agriculture
Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd
Salisbury, NC28147-8147
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secrelaq
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
RECEIVEDINCDENRIDWj�
FEB 2 0 2018
WQROS
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS
Permit Number AWC800001
Rowan County
Dear Permittee,
As of this date, our. records indicate that the above -referenced permit issued to your facility has
overdue fees. It is both a condition of your permit and required by Rule 15A NCAC 2T A 105(e) (2) to pay
the annual administering and compliance fee within thirty (30) days of being billed by this Division.
The following invoices are outstandins:
Invoice Number
Due Date
Outstanding Fee $
2017PR009010
11/6/2017
180
Failure to pay the fee accordingly may result in the Division initiating enforcement actions, to
include the assessment of civil penalties. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a
recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water Resources who may issue
a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person'
who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under
authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. Therefore, it is imperative that you submit the appropriate fee as requested
within thirty (30) days of this Notice of Deficiency.
Please remit the payment, made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), in the above amount. Please include Permit Number on your check and mail this
payment to:
Division of Water Resources — Budget Office
Attn: Teresa Revis
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
-contd.-
_-. 'Nothing Compares:� ,w
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center j Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Animal Feeding Operations
Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
Debra J. Watts, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation, and
Ground Water Protection Branch
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
WQROS Central File (Permit No AWC800001)

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
March 13, 2017
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
NC Dept of Agriculture
Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd
Salisbury, NC28147-8147
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
RFCF_1VEDlNC0ENR1DW R
MAR 16 2017
W4R0s
tA00RESVILLE REG ONAL OFFICE
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS
Permit Number AWC800001
Rowan County
Dear Permittee,
As of this date, our records indicate that the above -referenced permit issued to your facility has
overdue fees. It is both a condition of your permit and required by Rule 15A NCAC 2T .0105(e) (2) to pay
the annual administering and compliance fee within thirty (30) days of being billed by this Division.
The following invoices are outstanding:
Invoice Number
Due Date
utstanding Fee $
2016PR009002
11/6/2016
180
Failure to pay the fee accordingly may result in the Division initiating enforcement actions, to
include the assessment of civil penalties. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a
recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water Resources who may issue
a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person"
who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under
authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. Therefore, it is imperative that you submit the appropriate fee as requested
within thirty (30) days of this Notice of Deficiency.
Please remit the payment, made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), in the above amount. Please include Permit Number on your check and mail this
payment to:
Division of Water Resources — Budget Office
Attn: Teresa Revis
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
-contd -
!�Nothing Cornpares.":-.,,_
State of North Carolina j Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707.9129

If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Animal Feeding Operations
Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
�6''o-
J.
Debra J. Watts, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation, and
Ground Water Protection Branch
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
WQROS Central File (Permit No AWC800001)

03/24/2009 11:19 17042781121 PIEDMONT RESEARCH ST PAGE 01/05
8350 Sherrilis Ford Road
Salisbury NC 28174
704278-2624
Fax: [phone],2-1
[e-mail]
FaX
gra: �QUA// �re [ �j � % f�
o
Fax: d � Pages
Phane; 24� Date: Z D
0 UMe"t aFe Raview ❑ Please Comment © Please Reply 0 Purse kecycie
a Cairimm2ls:

C3/24/2009 11:19 17042781121 PIEDMONT RESEARCH ST PAGE 02/05
Steven W. Troxior North Carolina Department of Agriculture L. Edward Pitxer
Commissioner and Consumer Services Director
Research Stations .Division
March 19, 2009
The waste utilization plan for the Piedmont Research Station needs and amendment added that includes
the way nitrogen is to be utilized on cover crops. This will be the amendment for that purpose.
The cover crops on the research station will not receive nitrogen as a standard practice. However if the
waste storage pond gets to a level that an application needs to be applied to the cover crop, then the
nitrogen applied to the cover crop will be subtracted from the RYE nitrogen total that is to be applied to
the next crop. This will account for the nitrogen applied to the cover crop.
Signed:
J. Ben Knox
Regional Agronomist
Agronomic Division NCDA&CS
Technical Specialist
Eddle. PUer(§ncmali.net
1001 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1001
[phone] 0 Fax[phone]
TTY; 1-800-735.2962 Voice_ 1-877-735.8200
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

03/24/2009 11:19
i
17042781121
PIEDMONT RESEARCH ST
PAGE 03/05
HARD HOSE -AND CABLE Tow TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
Irrigation Syst Calibration Data Shept for Hard Hose Traveler Irrigation System
DATE:- - J . Land Owner
Farm No. ----------- - _
a. Manufacturers' Specifications_ Gun Model
Type
Nozzle Dia, In Pressure (Gun)
(Reel)
Wetted diameter T- ft Effective
ft Flow
Spacing
CPM
Hose Size: Length ft Diameter
in
b. Spacing between collection containers (diameter16) = ft
C. wetted diameter (ft)
2j[p f
Number of gauges = _
gauge spacing (ft)
°
d. Start of Irrigation event � 3/,0/41�'y�
hn 1 Use :
ftwl can ---�` "-•�?f
9.70 rr" 1
e. End of Irr i ation event
9
i•R p+y r
" ' " z a 0 = 1 = : 7 a ' a a '
�
C Duratlon (e -d) S min
I �
g 716 } 4 2 1f
4 Old h n rY p n
r m
eloo9oaQ 00000�lao
I] 1} f} tl Urn
n g 4 D 0 0i
/�lyr! c[snn rll
g. Travel distance f v�5� feet
Narw I
ail
I
I
h. Operate the system, collect data,
I
I I
and record on the worksheet on page 8_
I
V'�f"
L Sure of all catches_ inches
V_—_._ERRrIre l.nef �W
�
j. Average catch (Unumber of gauges) inches
I I
I
Distance traveled (fit)
//
k. Average travel speed =
Time (min)
I. Sum of all deviations from the average catch
m. Average deviation from average catch
n. Uniformity coefficient
(i) - - (m)
U = K 100
�.
G)
Interpret the calibration data and make necessary adjustments.
For travelers with proper overlap and operated in light wind, an application uniformity Coefficient greater than
B5 is common.
Application uniformity between 70 to 85 is in the "good" range and is acceptable for wastewater application.
Generally, an application uniformity below 70 is considered unacceptable for wastewater irrigation using
travelers. If the computed U. is less than 70, system adjustments are required. Contact your irrigation dealer or
Certified Technical Specialist for assistance -
0

03/24/2009 11:19 17042781121 PIEDMONT RESEARCH ST PAGE 04/05
Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Applicatlon F(luipment
Calibration Data (continued)
Gauge distance
Volume
Overlap
Corrected
No. from Center
Collected
Adjustment
Volume
(feet)
(inches)
(inches)
(inches)
Ll
�
'7Y
L2 L2
L3
�p
7
L4
L5
L6
937
L7
Ls
L9
Ll 0
R1
--r
R7_
R3
R4
i bb
q.77
R6
Imo,
R7
R8
R9
RIO
'Absolute value;
trent all values cs posirlve.
Left
Ra" of g T 4 S a 3 7 1
gauge[
Guh
cert
l3hoc4on of trawl
Right
1 2 3 -1 S G 7 n
0❑❑ O D 0 0 0 4-
_._Va Wd 4Ji*PM lef� ? dF.imeler St1d "Cd
(320 feet) '
OeviaUQF)
from Average`
(inches)
17 n-)

03/24/2009 11:19 17042781121 PIEDMONT RESEARCH ST PAGE 05/05
-9.
5
b
r
%A

= . 700 IFY1
RCDENK
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
December 30, 2010
North Carolina Department of
Agriculture & Consumer Services
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
Re: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
NOD -2010 -PC -1245
15A N.C.A.C. 2T. 1304
Piedmont Research Station/Facility 80-01
General Permit AWC800001
Rowan County
Dear North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services:
During June, 2010, a representative of your animal operation informed staff of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer Protection Section (APS) that there was
inadequate freeboard in the Lagoons(s) or Storage Pond(s) serving the facility. General Permit
Condition 111.13 states -- "Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division
Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following
first knowledge of the ... failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater
than or equal to that required in. . . this General Permit." We appreciate the fact that you
reported the problem of high waste level as required by your permit and have worked with our
staff to manage the problem once it occurred.
While we recognize the extraordinary weather conditions existing at the time, the lack of
adequate freeboard reported to our office still represents non-compliance with the Certificate of
Coverage issued to your facility. As you are aware, this non-compliance is subject to appropriate
enforcement action by DWQ. The factors that lead to non-compliance, efforts to notify DWQ of
the problem, efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent
future problems have all been factors in our decision regarding enforcement. Upon review and
consideration of the information submitted and/or discussed with DWQ staff, the Mooresville
Regional Office has determined that a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) is appropriate and that no
further compliance/enforcement actions will be taken by the Division for the high waste levels
occurring between October, 2009 and June, 2010.
Divisior of Water Quality 1 Aquifer Protection Section 1 Mooresvilte Regional duce
610 Past CerterAvenua, Suite 301. Mooresville, North Carolina 25115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] k Customer Service: 1-877.623-6748
Internet: Yow.nwaterquality.erc
.=R Cyuw trp0.tu pity k +.i:umn=-oi�.? Ac, -an Fmpiover
One
No thr,aroli.na
drall

Piedmont Research Station/Facility 80-01
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
December 30, 2010
Page 2
In the future, please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range.
This may include, but is not limited to, water conservation practices, adding additional
application . sites, updating your cropping systems, adding additional and/or more flexible
application equipment, and maintaining the waste levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate
levels throughout the year. Our staff looks forward to continuing to work with you and your
Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement any needed changes to your system.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated December 3, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division. of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWC800001
Regional Permit File AWC80000t
jb
V

►.1
Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 8CC001 Facility Status: Active Permit: 61/VC800001 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comp}iance Insgectign Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine_. County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12103,1201Q Entry Time: 12:00 PM Exit Time: 01:30 PM
Farm Name: Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS
Owner: NC DeM of Agriculture
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 8350 Sherrills Ford Rd Salisbury NC 28147__
Physical Address: 8MO Sherrills Ford -Rd- Salisbury NC 28147
Facility Status: n Compliant ■ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°41'30" Longitude: 80037'30"
From the intersection of Hwy 801 and SR 1526 (Sherrills Ford Rd.), travel east on Sherrills Ford Rd. Headquarters approximately one
mile east on Sherrills Ford Rd.
Question Areas:
® Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Turner C Hal! Operator Certification Number: 20956
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Turner C. Hall Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Robert S. Graham Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealie Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AVVC800001 Owner - Facility: NC L7ept of Agriculture Facility Number: 800001
Inspection Date: 12/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
10/13/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.9 Lbs/1000 Gallons
09/16/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.6 Lbs/1000 Gallons
10/14/10 > Soil Analysis
14. Facility Operators are currently in the process of coordinating with Rowan SWCDINRCS to revise the CAWMP to include
additional fields for waste application.
24. Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
31, Weekly Freeboard records indicate that the maximum waste level in the Storage Pond was exceeded in June, 2010. DWO was
notified of emergency situat'Eons on 06103110, and the POA was received on 06/09/10 as required by Permit; NOD to follow.
C.
Page: 2

Permit: AVVC800001 Owner -Facility: NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number: 800001
Inspection Date: 12/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Milk Cow 150 111
Total Design Capacity: . 150
Total SSLW: 210.000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WP1
18.00
42,00
Page: 3

Permit.: AVVC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number: 800001
Inspection Date: 12!0312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? C ■ D C
Discharge originated at:
Structure C
Application Field D
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n0 1
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) D 0 ■ D
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
D C
■
D
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the'operation?
D ■
D
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
U ■
D
D
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
D ■
D
D
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe n ■ D C
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ rl
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? D ■ C D
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, D ■ D ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or D ■ D D
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or C ■ D D
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? C ■ D D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload? D
Frozen Ground? C
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 4

Permit: AVVC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept of Agriculture
Inspection Date: 12/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 900001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P2O5?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Alfalfa
Crop Type 2
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Matua (Hay)
Crop Type 5
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 6
Soybeans
Scii Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type S
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving craps differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
■ n n n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■ n n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n ■ n n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ■ n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■ n n
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fad to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■ n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
n
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - facility: NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number : 800001
Inspection Date: 12103/2010 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ n n
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Froeboard?
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
inspections after 7 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
n
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
n
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility faii to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■ n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
n
n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
® Q
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
o n
27. Did the faci#ity fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PIAT) certification?
n
n
■ o
r,,,___,______
Yes
No
NA N€
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n ■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ 0 n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ rl n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept of Agriculture
Facility Number:
800001
Inspection Date: 1 210 312 0 1 0 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
n
■
n
n
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
n
■
o
o
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n
®
n
n
34. Are subsurface drains present on this farm?
❑
0
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Spray Field n
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
Page: 7

FILE
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
North Carolina Department of
Agriculture & Consumer Services
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
December 30, 2010
Re: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
NOD -2010 -PC -1245
15A N.C.A.C. 2T.1304
Piedmont Research Station/Facility 80-01
General Permit AWC800001
Rowan County
Dear North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services:
During June, 2010, a representative of your animal operation informed staff of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer Protection Section (APS) that there was
inadequate freeboard in the Lagoons(s) or Storage Pond(s) serving the facility. General Permit
Condition Ill, 13 states — "Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division
Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following
first knowledge of the ... failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater
than or equal to that required in. . . this General Permit." We appreciate the fact that you
reported the problem of high waste level as required by your permit and have worked with our
staff to manage the problem once it occurred.
While we recognize the extraordinary weather conditions existing at the time, the lack of
adequate freeboard reported to our office still represents non-compliance with the Certificate of
Coverage issued to your facility. As you are aware, this non-compliance is subject to appropriate
enforcement action by DWQ. The factors that lead to non-compliance, efforts to notify DWQ of
the problem, efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent
future problems have all been factors in our decision regarding enforcement. Upon review and
consideration of the information submitted and/or discussed with DWQ staff, the Mooresville
Regional Office has determined that a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) is appropriate and that no
further compliance/enforcement actions will be taken by the Division for the high waste levels
occurring between October, 2009 and June, 2010.
L.)Msion of Water Quality I Aquifer Pro'mc;on Section,' Mooresville Regional Office
614 Fast Center Avenue, Suite 301, Moc esville. North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone]t Pax: 704-F-616 '0 ! Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Inteme . %-vnv.no+va1erquality.or9
o1
NtKarolina
amlla

L r —; -1
Piedmont Research Station/Facility 80-01
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
December 30, 20101'
Page 2
In the future, please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range.
This may include, but is not limited to, water conservation practices, adding additional
application sites, updating your cropping systems, adding additional and/or more flexible
application equipment, and maintaining the waste levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate
levels throughout the year. Our staff looks forward to continuing to work with you and your
Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement any needed changes to your system.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance inspection Report dated December 3, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWC800001
Regional Permit File AWC800001
IS

® Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 80CC01 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800001 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comotiance_ Insneciion
Reason for Visit: Routine County
Inactive or Closed Date:
Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12/03!2Q10 Entry Time:12:00 PM Exit Time: 01:30 PM
Farm Name: Piedmont Research Station/NCDAQS
Owner: NC Dept of Agriculture
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 835D SherrillsFord li NC 28147
Physical Address: 8350 Sherrills Ford Rd SaliNQ147
Facility Status: n Compliant ■ Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°41'30" Longitude: 80°37'30"
From the intersection of Hwy 801 and SR 1526 (Sherrills Ford Rd.), travel east on Sherrills Ford Rd. Headquarters approximately one
mile east on Sherrills Ford Rd,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Turner C Hall
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Operator Certification Number: 20956
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
24 hour contact name Turner C. Hafl
On-site representative Robert B. Graham
Primary Inspector: James Bealle
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Date:��
v
Page: 1

Permit: AVVC800001 Owner -Facility: NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number: 800001
Inspection Date: 12103/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
10/13/10 > Waste Analysis > N =1.9 Lbs/1000 Gallons
09/16/10 > Waste Analysis > N =1.6 Lbs11000 Gallons
10/14/10 > Soil Analysis
14, Facility Operators are currently in the process of coordinating with Rowan SWCDINRCS to revise the CAWMP to include
additional fields for waste application.
24. Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
31. Weekly Freeboard records indicate that the maximum waste level in the Storage Pond was exceeded in June, 2010 DWQ was
notified of emergency situations on 06103110, and the POA was received on 06/09/10 as required by Permit; NOD to follow.
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number. 800001
Inspection nate: 12/03/2010 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
W Cattle -Milk Caw 150 111
Total Design Capacity: 150
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�aste Pond WP1 18.00 42.00
Page: 3

Permit: AVVC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number : 500001
Inspection Date: 12/03/2010 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ Q
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field n
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ fl
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the'operation?
n ■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n ■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n ■
n
n
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
nn
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe ❑ ■ — —
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
$. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n ■ n n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? n ■ f7 ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, n ■ n 0
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or n ■ ❑ f]
improvement?
Yes No NA NE
_Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or n ■ D
Improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? n ■ ❑ 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
n
Excessive Ponding? —
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? fl
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Page: 4

I
Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: INC Dept of Agriculture
Inspection Date: 12!4312010 Inspection Type: Compliance fnspection
Facility Number: 800001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste; Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
rl
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare scil?
fi
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
0
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Alfalfa
Crop Type 2
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Matua (Hay)
Crop Type 5
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 6
Soybeans
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
■ n n n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■ n 0
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n ■ n n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for iand application?
n ■ n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■ n n
Records and documents
Yes No NA NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■ n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Page: 5

V
Permit: AWC800001 pwner - Facility: NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number : 800001
Inspection Date: 1 210 312 01 0 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps?
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? n
120 Minute inspections? n
Weather code? n
Weekly Freeboard? n
Transfers? n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall 8 monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
o n Cl
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n ■ n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
i
n n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
Cl
n ■ Q
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ n n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
n ■ n
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■ n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page:6

N
Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept of Agriculture
Inspection bate: 1210312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 800001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other ISSUeS
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility faif to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
n
■
n
n
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspecticn with on-site representative?
n
■
Q
n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n
■
n
n
34. Are subsurface drains present on this farm?
[!
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Spray Field
n
Lagoon I Storage Pond
n
Other
n
Page: 7

A7itA
11 IL
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Pat McCrory
Governor September 3, 2015
North Carolina Department of
Agriculture & Consumer Services
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
Resources
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Piedmont Research Station/Facility 80-01
General Permit AWC800001
Rowan County
Dear North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services:
On March 27, 2015, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Piedmont Research Station and
the permitted waste disposal system.. We wish to thank Robert B. Graham, who was present and
.assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jame . Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated March 27, 2015
jb
Mooresville Regional Office, 610 East Center Avenue, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.nodenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmadve Action Employer — Made In part by recycled paper

A Division of Water Resources
11 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Facility Number: 800001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AVVC800001
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County Rowan Region:
Date of Visit:
03/27/2015 Entry Time: 11:00 am Exit Time
Farm Name:
Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS
Owner:
NC Dept of Agriculture
Mailing Address:
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd
12:30 nm
Incident #
Owner Fmallp
Phone:
Salisbury NC 28147
Physical Address: 8350 Sherrills Ford Rd Salisbury NC 28147
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Denied Access
Mooresville
joe. [e-mail]%
704-278-2624
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 411'30" Longitude: 80° 37'30"
From the intersection of Hwy 801 and SR 1526 (Sherrills Ford Rd.), travel east on Sherrills Ford Rd. Headquarters approximately
one mile east on Shenills Ford Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat. Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Tumer C Hall Operator Certification Number: 20956
Secondary OiC(s):
On -Site Repreaentative(s): Name 'Title Phone
24 hour contact name Turner C. Hail Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Robert B. Graham Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: James
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
02105/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 1911 Lbs11000 Gallons
11/12/14 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.28 Lbs/1000 Gallons
09/19/14 > Soil Analysis
ib
Phone: [phone] Exp
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number: 800001
Inspection Date: 03/27/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 150 160
Total Design Capacity: 150
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures Observed
Disignated
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WP1 18.00 28.00
0
page: 2

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number: 800001,
Inspection Date: 03/27/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
❑
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Structure
❑
M ❑
❑
Application Field
❑
PAN?
❑
Other
❑
❑
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Cl
❑ ■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑ '
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yee
No Na Ne
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
❑
PAN?
❑
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
■ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
01313
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na He
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit:. AWC800001 Owner - Facility : NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number: 800001
Inspection Date: 03/27/15 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Alfalfa
Crop Type 2
Corn (silage)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Matua (Hay)
Crop Type 5
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 6
Soybeans
Soil Type 1
❑
Soil Type 2
❑
Soil Type 3
Cl
Soil Type 4
❑
Soil Type 5
❑
Soil Type 6
❑
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
❑
Other?
Cl
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yea No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
Cl
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility : NC Dept of Agriculture - Facility Number: 800001
Inspection Date: 03/27/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yee No Nam
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
❑
N ❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
❑
E ❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ E
❑
(NPDES only)?
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
24. Did the facility fall to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ 0
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fall to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ■
❑
Other Issues
Yea
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
N ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ N ❑ ❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
page: 5

PAT-MCCRORY
l.`, � �� � Governor
DONALD-R:I VA'N, DER VAART
Scr✓viary
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYS. JAY ZIMMERMAN
DlreclDr
December 16, 2016
'.North Carolina Department of
Agriculture & Consumer Services
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Piedmont Research Station/Facility 80-01
General Permit AWC800001
Rowan County
Dear North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services:
On October 31, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality .Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Piedmont Research Station and
the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank Robert B. Graham, who was present and
assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should' you have any questions
concerning this report, please -contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
es B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated October 31, 2016
jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality ).Water Resources I Water Quality Rcgional Op=tions.
Mooresvillo Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Moorosv le, North Carolina 26115"
704 663 1699

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conaeriration ~ w
Other Agency
Facility Number. 800001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800001 E] Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: .1013112016 Entry Time: 03:00 pm Exit Time: 4:30 pm Incident it
Farm Name: Piedmont Research StationlNCDACS Owner -"m ll: joe.hampton®ncagr•go%
Owner: NC Dept of Agriculture Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 8350 SherOls Ford Rd Salisbury NC 28147
Physical Address;: 8350 Sherrills Ford Rd Salisbury NC 28147
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36'41'3a' Longitude: 80° 37'30"
From the intersection of Hwy 801 and SR 1526 (Sherrills Ford Rd.), travel east on Sherrills Ford Rd. Headquarters approximately
one mile east on Sherrills Ford Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert Bradley Graham Operator Certification Number: 993853
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Robert B. Graham Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Stephen R. Collins Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
10/20116 > Waste Analysis ,> N = 1.70 Lbs11000 Gallons
08/12/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.14 Lbs11000 Gallons
09/23/16 > Soil Analysis
ib
Phone: [phone] E:d
Date
page,.
' 1

JI
f
Permit: AWC800001
Owner - Facility : NC Dept of Agriculture
Facility Number:
800001-
00041_Inspection
inspectionDate: 10/31/18
Inpsectlon Type: -Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle Milk Cow
150
..150
Total Design Capacity:
150
Total SSLW:
'210,000
Waste_ Structutea
Disignated
Observed .
Type Identifier
Closed Date Start Date
Freeboard
Freeboard
Waste Pond
WP1
18.00
48.00
JI
f

Permit AWC800001' Owner - Facility : NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number.
800001
Inspection Dater 10131IM6 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason.for Visit
Routine.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No No No
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
Q
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
1:10
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑'
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, 5torane & Treatment
Xjs No Na No
4. Is storage'capacity less than adequate?
❑'
M ❑
❑
If "yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M. ❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site.that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a _
❑ `
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as.required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yea
No Nagle
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or. improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
:M ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below. .
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
[]
.
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
,
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?.
❑
'
page: 3 .

Permit: AWC800001 Owner- Facility,: NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number.
800001
Inspection Date: 10/31/16 1npsection Type: ' CompGanoe Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Aoolication w
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Alfalfa
Crop Type 2'. _ _
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Matua (Hay)
Crop Type 5
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 6
Soybeans
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6 .
14. Oo the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ `M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ■ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑
18.. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ N ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP7
❑
Checklists?
❑ .
Design?
❑
Maps? -
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
"
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑ _
Stocking?
❑
page: ..,
4

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility : ' NC Dept of Agriculture Facility Number: i 800001
Inspection Date: 10/31/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:. Routine
Records and Documents XSj No Na No
Crop yields? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ E
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
�]
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
[]
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ N
❑
Other Issues
vae Ng Na Ng
28. Did the facility fall to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
■ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please'specify
32. Were any additionai problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33- Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
.34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?.
❑
❑
❑
page: 5 .

(Type of Visit: *Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
I#Reason for Visit: #'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 4 t Arrival Time: jCyS1,00kNA Departure Time: ounty: I Region:
Farm Name: X)Ct4 ° Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
*'>'& i%1� , Git- CA,,
a4t�j� J�., f. ` VLy-�
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number: "
4
Longitude:
�4. t�
�d r�.�yy"���
�,�q V• a:.
w� _ 17.
'� 4 , y �J�^
`
� 'vim •'4 �
J �. .4f 4u..3 �:'Ai
.�, �- ",�; � l,t.
���r'—
MEr M.
wN
kA
■ r 1
s� rOHM:
M.11
Fx � 1 '
�_ -a
■ *
_�
er
i+7� 'T�t f+j, f' sI ."�`id
fi, V"rv' }� fihJF�` A d.
;x
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ N NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
C, What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State�(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Ye_ s ❑ No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters. ❑ Yes o E] NA E] NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/411011 Continued

Facility Number: -
Date of Inspection:
Waste'Coliection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure I 5kqjcture 2 Structure 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
Structure 4
observed?
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
El Yes [] No -NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ NA [:]NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or envir mental threat, notify DWQ
7.0o any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
r_
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any.required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yew' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA [j NE
❑ Excessive Ponding [] Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground - ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): '
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
R wired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Vi or
❑ Yes,
[] Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA [] NE
❑NA ❑NE
N'A ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [] Yew❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate bo
WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements E] Other:
21. Does record keeping need improv ent? If yes, checkth priate.box below.. Y o NA NE .
O<aste A Ii ti eekly Freeboard ste Analysis o' lysis a ransfers o e
a 1 ocking rop Yield Minute Inspections Monihlyand V Rainfall Inspections dge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install, and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [] Yes ❑ N NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

0% �z t
1�Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: �C�]NA
24. Did the facility fail to calib plicatiga equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes�-�E
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ONO
NE
the appropriate boxes) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose o ea hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were high an normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emer enc si as required by the ❑ Y s ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -a n
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Ye�oNA 0 NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ YNA E] NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
----------------
I D'i
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011'

Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: @ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
IYIP��Ir�1l�ll1 P191111�11�1�1`�
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: JA.2. ounty
Farm Name: % e fi��Owner Email:
Owner Name: QC— t) k– * Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Region:)
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:WAT
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm: .
Title: Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator: qr /
Certification Number: l �b
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Diseharaes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
p Des�gu r Current:.
=
Design
Cii rrent ' :
A 1 =
Des" ign Current'
❑ NE
3wme"'
CapacrtyP,op
Wet Poultry 'Capacity
-Pop
Cattle
Cap a ity
Wean to Finish
La er
airy Cow
CO 0
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
5airy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Designi
?Poultr Ca aci .
'Current
.P.o P.
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non-Dairy#t
Farrow to Wean
;r. Farrow to FeedetD
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
x.
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Other
_
Turkey PoultsL_L
Other 4
k
Diseharaes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
"�A
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [] Yes No [] NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: JDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment ��o
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0 NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No CNA ❑ NE
M Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
d Identifier: ---
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes f�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
,waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes o E] NA F] NE
maintenance or improvement? L
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes,4tj:�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, e c.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs.
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
[] Evidence of Wind Drift
Application Outside of Approved Area
1
G � Gv--,q
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
th b
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o
to
E]NA
E] NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ YesjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
E] Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
)<No
❑ NA
❑ NE
e app roprrate ox.
is s Design Maps Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.) ,oe. record keeping nee�rovement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Wee Freeboard Waste Analysis Analysis aste Transfers er Code
Rainfall 5tockin Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/20.11 Continued
1�

Facility Number: jDate of inspection: �►�—
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No 1A ❑ NE
thea riate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ailure to develop a POA for sludge levels
on -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No gA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals—with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of nUgLnc_y situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-ap ca ran
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
er tp question #) Explain any YES answers ands
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
e�Ye:s�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesTo NA
❑ Yes❑ NA
Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
2/4/2011
1

40
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
NCDA&CS
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
Dear NCDA&CS:
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
May 14, 2009
Subject: Additional Information Request
Application No. AWC800001
Piedmont Research Station
Rowan County
D
reema .—
"�
cr
p� 5
r—Z
m
;0 Co
-o
@O
o
i
The Animal Feeding Operation Unit of Division of Water Quality's Aquifer Protection Section has completed a
preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is required before we may
continue our review. Please address the following item(s) within 30 (thirty) days of receipt of this letter:
Missing, Waste Utilization Plan,:
You were requested to submit two copies of your facility's waste utilization plan (WUP or, nutrient
management plan, NMP) that include information on the number and type of animals, amount of waste
produced, crop types, and fields along with technical specialist and owner signatures. Our records show entire
copy of the waste plan is missing in your permit package.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised and/or
additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated, with two (2) copies submitted to my attention at the
address below. Please note that failure to provide this additional information on or before the above requested date
may result in your application being returned as incomplete.
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and
regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the responsibility
of the applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items shall result in future requests for
additional information.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a
civil penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation
of NCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at [phone]
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Files- AWC800001
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwateraualitv.ore Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
Sincerely,
J. . Joshi
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
t
Carolina
llNAV
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

Diviiio of Water�Quality -
I Facility Numifer ®' - I� Division of Soiian W ter Conservation i �?
OytherAgency? _M
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine' 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2a 1 Arrival Time: a3. °� _ , Departure Time: + County: Region., Vg%
Farm Name: �� e _ _ �� _ Owner Emall:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: \
Certified Operator: T\)
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
�°
Swine � �
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
k Design
Capacity
Current
`Pop.
Design Current
'"Wet�Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -La er
`Cattle
iry Cow
Dai Calf -
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
(Sol
Feeder to Finish
Di.Podltr r:
Design Current
aci P,.o ...
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Othe
Turkeys
!.Turkey Pouits
Other I
10ther I
W�!/K'+/�•-.sa.vf3+��wi•,a.w•wb�v �*sa.r.asK®?afmRw�.+-4
'Sv.e�:r-Y.C:�r,+:;v:u.¢..�m+newr,._"V-f a:4'l.u�`: Y -«'leve
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �o [:] NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑Structure F-1 Application Field ❑Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 6NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes ❑No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ YesO ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? 7?
Page I of 3 2/412011 Continued

Facitity Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Isstorage apacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?: �—� �or►�
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No , NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
0 Yes J!�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
[] NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes, t!:CNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes Vo [] NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes I 5 o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
[:]'Outside of Acceptable Crop Windo ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes � o ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yeso ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
F] Yes T� ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need im rovement? If yes, check the propriate box below. Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
q�Vaste Applicata n need
Freeboard Waste Analysis Sol alysis as a rs .13V r Code
;❑�ainfali Stockin Crop Yiel 120 Minute Inspections onthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued
i

ri acility Number: - Date of Inspection:
s
.� 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
��7 �esoN NA
[] NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
Yes
0 No �A
NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Yes
o ❑ NSA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
E] Yes
E] No �
0 NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dde d anni als-wcith 24 hours and/or document
10 E] NA
[] NE
Yes
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
Is— le
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? Yes 0&4W NA NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emer tions as required by the Yes NA NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-applica ion
3 i. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes _t?fgo 0 NA [] NE
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yeso A NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
ED
o NA E] NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewedlnspecto'r Signature:
r A dwn
C] Yes E] Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
C_�
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 " 2/4/2011

r
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 3.. Departure Time: County: Region: 1]
Farm Name: P le Rea" :` �N� "�+� �
per Email:
Owner Name: J �C ' -' \1 C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: r
Certified Operator: rle)c GI V 1 Certification Number: a b
Back-up Operator: RC�� r—�"�WI Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine � -_ Capacit,
A'Fr_�'^. �•` _ _..R : a. �Y lP. .ry: Yx <. F....y _ ,;n
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
s Gilts
Boars
4.
:Other
Other
F Wet Poultry
DeslgriCurrent Design Cunei
�.
apacetyu Pop Cattle Capacity
ai Cow rj
_1
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[] Yes 1 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [j No❑ NE
❑ Yes E] No
No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 2/412011 Continued
Non -Layer
a
Dai Calf
Dairy Heifer
`Desagm' �Current�
Dry Cow
ca D ,:Poultr Ca aci
;Pop.,-.-,
Non -Dairy
Layers
Beef Stocker
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Turkey PouIts
;. Other,
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[] Yes 1 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [j No❑ NE
❑ Yes E] No
No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 2/412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus -storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural Freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: • Pn
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
CN: -
Observed Freeboard (in):
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
two
NA ❑ NE
❑ NoIA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Yes Wo
Yes Z<o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ YesZ�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? l
❑ Yes�No
DNA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes�Rlo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes �Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu; Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Win
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
e' S
❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Application Outside of Approved
� C'n� � ,�oi'1�9•�, Pd x
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
4
❑ Yes _J;eo
❑ Yes 1jr5lo
❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yeo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ greements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need im ement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes No ❑ NA NE
aste A lication Wee o rd Waste Analysis oil Analysis Waste Transfers Bather Code
Rainfall tocking rop Yield 0 Minute Inspectionsnthly and I" Rainfall Inspecti s Sludge Survey
22. Did the acility fail to install and main air a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No Y<NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/412011 Continued

iracili Number: - Date of Inspection:
i
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? GR7* Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No �WA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for slue lev� s
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of deaunzai�with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emQrjzency situations as required b i
pen -nit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-appkation)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or C
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representa
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No A NE
9E§PNo NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
MYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes kko ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yeso
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer, to question#):`Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommend ns or any other. comments
:. z tr
Use drawings of facility to better explain" situations (use additional pages as necessary).
1
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 214/2011

iservy, on
Type of Visit * Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit i6Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: za-, Departure Time, t78:� County.
Farm Name: t all Owner Email:
Owner Name:
C '
- _ -- -- -- Phone: .,_.
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Region-.
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: �� ��
Back-up Certification Number: 1,3�5$
Location of Farm: Latitude: o Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design .. Current
Swine ' Capacity Population ' " Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity P_2pulaHon
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
Mu:rkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Dai Cow
Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ DEZ Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
El -Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes,,j!Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No '& A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No WA [__1 [I
El Yes A [INE
El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued
Facillty"Number*
t '
iservy, on
Type of Visit * Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit i6Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: za-, Departure Time, t78:� County.
Farm Name: t all Owner Email:
Owner Name:
C '
- _ -- -- -- Phone: .,_.
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Region-.
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: �� ��
Back-up Certification Number: 1,3�5$
Location of Farm: Latitude: o Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design .. Current
Swine ' Capacity Population ' " Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity P_2pulaHon
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
Mu:rkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Dai Cow
Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ DEZ Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
El -Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes,,j!Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No '& A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No WA [__1 [I
El Yes A [INE
El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
,ttructu e 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
P[dentifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yeso ❑ NA EINE
El Yes El No
El
Structure 5 i. Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes-Eago ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan? /
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenj;;rea t, no DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Avo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ElNE
❑ Excessive Ponding ElHydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [IHeavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evide?nce of Wind Drift [I Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) � 1 �"1 1 �v �` K(<,Z44
(„.� C� C ��5
13. Soil type(s)
VA Camey
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? Yes t io
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �o
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or`wettable acre determination: ❑ Yes ko
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
0 N El NE
El NA El NE
[71 NA El NE
El NA El NE
§K -4 t:;�r �..4il 4
;Comments (refer,to question #) Explain any�YES answers,andlor.t y recommendations or any other cammenfa,.
IIsewin of;facility'tabe f eaplainfsfhist n�s(use;dditianalpageskas necessary):
� ;���,[�'Air+?int'abs.�”i�i�..F+k?i�n�.'�`.�FeFwrt£�fl5_?�.":�;,��SL54.:•k�'�'C�'f'i'f�r7L1Y+.wc^Y�zSA9��3. f t���pp��yy ',� .
�'SSf
bq1.? l
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

i
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents ,.
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ecklists Design MapsOther
21. Does record keeping need impr ment? If yes, check the appropriate box be Yes o ❑ NA El NE
aste Application kly Freeboard�aste Analysis of Analysis�ste Transfers nual Certification
.xainfall toc ing
I�Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspectioonthly and 1" Rain Inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? y`
C_
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?,�
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were hi r tan normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problem er app ica ion Iq
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
�❑
❑ NE
❑ Yes No)�Nn
❑ NE
os ❑No El NA
[1 NE
❑ Yes ❑ No�A
❑ NE
❑ Yes jKo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No L:
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Yeso ElNA
ElNE
❑ Yes/C110 ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
'+� �� s f( �-•.-t ESN N4 R� �f 4 _,. r.(� i�'sr, i "l lC'^:
Adilittona! Comritents aiidlor Drawings.
- Y.. l' •t '1� ._P y �, i`k"� �4. 4.?ie"� . ��. F wS'.�r �-.i
12128104
12128104

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit �* Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral () Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit- Arrival Time: Departure Time
Farm Name:
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
County:Region:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:l ` Operator Certification Number: �� _
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
��
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Latitude: =0 = 1 0 Longitude: =0=6
o❑6 0
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity -Population
❑
Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current I
Cattle Capacity P PU1Q Qn
ai Cow I t
ErDairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
El DEY Cow''
❑ Non -Dai
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Ye�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No�A. ❑ NE
Yes, ❑ No IA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128/04 Continued

r
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No El NA El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 tructure 6
Identifier: r `"
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): y
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed El Yes
El NA [I NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. _Doesany part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ElNA [INE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes[INA ElNE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of -Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wi d Drifl flAp Ii tion Outsid of Area
r q �<�-
12. Crop type(s) ------ f�N�� V",
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
r2 J s El No
El NA
F-1NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
L` Yes o
❑
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acre determination%❑ Yes�To
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yeo
ElNA
El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
:to
CJS
«". �c t� E
ReviewerlInspector Name f ' w.�� 7 ray r �, `' Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

I1�'acilityNumber: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o El NA El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have ail components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. c Ests ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need im vement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes ❑ NA El NE
Waste Applicatio Weekly Freeboard astoile Analysis Analysis ste Transfers Certification
air ll ❑ Sto' eking rap Yield 120 Minute Inspections BMonthly and 1 ° Rain Inspections Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes32Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
�A
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?�nF
ElYes �fo
El
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes�:XA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fait to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes [I
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ yes hKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher t an normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yeo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of ewer s as required by ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, verapplication)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ElYes NA ❑ NE
-5 fg i �.�"' $ ".yi-.S-.5-..� Y �.an - �` 'i J �✓; �v t�` _-.f� kT�ii� .'..5da
Addrhonal Cornmeuts and/or Drawnt S ,
_g. „: ...
.` I
� a
IF�� \A
a-�: 9 4 e. , ti
Iry
R^e, v N
12/28/04

0
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit (k Routine O Complaint O Follow: up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time r I County:. Region: _
Farm Name:
Owner Email:
Owner Name: r Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
_.'Title: ______ Phone No:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
—! Back-up Certification Number:
0 0, =, Longitude: =0=1 o=1
Design Currenf:1 Design Current . Design Current,,".
Swine Capacity Population ` Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle .:` Capacity Po on..
❑ Wean to Finish
4. ❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer
❑ Nan -La ez
- Dry Poultry
❑ Pullets
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
EI.Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stoekei
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl I
`Other ` ❑ Turke Poults '
Other ❑Other Number of Structures:.,
Discharees & Stream Imaacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )6o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No X1
A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0 .
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is•stora a capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �E�❑ NSA, [� NE
V4 a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'? ❑ Yes [:]No' �A ❑ NE
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: P
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in)- U
Observed Freeboard (in): Z7
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ElYes Z ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �lNo [INA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ YesNQ1lo [INA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
mai ntenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
6 PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [IEvidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
v
12. Crop type(s) 1y r �� V_i S)` ! __ e S o �.
13. Soil type(s)% �C CA\tc�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
c ,%� s ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes :�Q
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acre determination: ❑ Yes [11NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE -
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El
❑ NA
❑ NE
%6:7 00
Reviewer[Inspector Name E�ih, s t -� k,; r:r �r r;`., � : s h"u , � F»` += " �
�t�,�, � �;.,� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

N
IFacility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. riid the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA [INE
the appropirate box. tst
ec s estgn Maps Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. EI Yes o ❑ NA [3 NE
�Xaste Application eekly Freeboard aste Ana ysis oil Analysis aste Transfers Annual Certification
ainfall ❑ tockitlg ❑ p Yield Minute Inspectionsonthly and I" Rain Inspections D VeatherCode
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes X10 �❑l NSA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
U -a
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were high r ai�"fl _n n -o mal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
1. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergent situ tions as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ YesIo
❑ Y . No
❑ NA ❑ NE
0 N El NE
❑ Yes _L� ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;!<4o ❑ NA ❑ N'
❑ Yes ❑ NA- ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Asltittyonal Comments antilo'r Drawings
C
'I. _ l)
N�
12/28/04

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FORM for HIGH WASTE L
IN -STRUCTURES AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
Facility Name:
oun y
eAVMO a7 � 2 5 �� � ��� 4 r,Pr✓ .
E juN ` 9 2010
NC DENit M O
A
DWQ - uifer Protection
Certified Operator Name: � C- A" Cc.4Operator #: 20 ps"��
r
Date that High Waste Level Was Initially Reported to DWQ: '41b
DWQ Contact Name:
_%��s BAL L4
Current Situation
List the current waste level(s) as measured from the waste level in the lagoon/storage pond to the,
lowest point on the top of the dam for structures without spillways; and from the waste level in the
structure to the bottom of the spillway for structures with spillways. Also list the quantity of waste
above the maximum liquid mark (also called "start pump").
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure Name/ID:�
Spillway (yes or no):
a
Waste Level (inches):
Above Maximum Mark (inches): iNcl�s
Dam is Slumping or Seeping (yes or no):�
Mitigating Factors
2. Brief summary (incl. date, type, and amount) of precipitation events contributing to high waste level:
' --oz, M
I�lvl®M'11 1,p, �p/v ,C?" sem?'iy Lf Y�V . /r!u .(LING /, 2.olr %.7f-
(� yol� 36r A7Ay}*,,y.ar0 oS /fik �,G��nw •C7 • T,,,AF o�v Wu,
r
m %rr r9 x�i� 1, y0.' InAy �J t/�,, � Su l+9Prr Al' av 0 .O� SNF 3� z�/L %. 7.('3. Dale df most recent waste application event:
rney /-2I %zOl'�?
4. Per the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), how is animal waste land -applied at
your facility (e.g. solid spreader, irrigation, honey wagon, slurry truck)?
Evaluation of Waste Management System
5. if applicable, has the cattle lot and barns been inspected for leaking drinkers? Hav6 repairs been
made? d
6. If applicable, is there enough guttering on the barns to exclude fresh water from the waste
structure? If not, when is installation or repairs to be made?
1'
High Was e Level POA Form-Mar2010

tj
�ncrir,�,., fi t t11
�w...i � iii Wt � Y15711 � .i. ,� i._:
7... If.applicable, is tie di ersion ditch around the waste structure functioning properly and excluding all
fresh water`fro.mlthe tructure?
A0-
8. Describe all methods employed to contain the waste or to exclude it from surface waters (e.g. berm,
ditch, retention hole, alters to application method, removal of cattle to pasture):
a'r Cfl#� ./° -�.� tj1i.1n/E✓</L—
��.r
Proposed Strateey
9. Describe moisture conditions in the field (e.g. standing -water, application equipment mars down in
field, "trafficability" across the soil, soils able to absorb application without runoff, application fields
frozen and/or snow covere ): Nd [.�� I�DR�r J fL. �,c-/tlG'4
�. ,,) , Il r /jrt,.✓ fie, IS �r¢N .f1.�S0� �
10. Given optimum soil and weather conditions, what is the earliest possible date that land application
could commence?
�uVCX_ I
11. Do you have a waste analysis obtained within 60 days of application?
12. Proposed receiving crop(s), acrea e, and application window(s):
x_711 eok`J
13. Is waste to be pumped and hauled to an off-site location? If so, list the volume and PAN content of
the waste to be hauled as well as the proposed site(s) with their related facility number, number of
acres, receiving crop information, etc. Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water
Quality prior to transfer of waste to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste plan.
I hereby certify that 1 have reviewed the information
and ability, the infor%%ation is accurate and correct.
f7h`LI--
Fa;lity Owner/Manager (print)
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
High Waste Level POA Farm-Mar2010
listed above, and to the best of my knowledge
Phone:
Date:

e r b
I.
®'Division of Water
O.Dtv'rsion of Soil 'and Water Conservation
1- J01 !Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit S Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up Q Referral 0 Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date or Visit: ybGi Arrival"rime• d�� • Departure Time: A$•.BP County. 1R` v' Region:
Farm Name: r 1y��1 LOwner Email:
Owner Name: L. C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: _
Phone No:
Onsite Representative. � _ Integrator:
Certified Operator: _ _.� Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: U'(' filer C ' _ 1 1''x_!1. S, Back-up Certification Number: Oct
�v_�_�_
Location of Farm: bz Latitude: ❑ e Longitude: e
0\
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine` Capacity Population Wet Poultry
Capacity Population �. Ca Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer I EE]
�C
Dry Poultry
Lin
Non -
I❑ Turl cv Pouits I I l
Cow ( ��
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heife)
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl I
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If ves, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Y ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ Noz�A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No _❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yeso '0 -NA— ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128/04 Continued

Facility Number: — 71 Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?.-
Designed
pillway?:Designed Freeboard (in): 1 h
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ,I o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes la ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?❑Yes
[3NA
El
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yesjr��E]
NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
Is there idence of incorrect ap ion? if yes, check thea priate box below. �' ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
xcessive Ponding. ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ F ozen Ground ❑ Hea etals (Cu,Zn _ctc.)
i
❑ PAN PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Pho Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crotp Window ❑Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Applic�atpionOutside of Area
12. Crop type(s)1 rr 1 `-"�'C�.
13. Soil type(s)
❑ NE
CVaz ^ LN-eA &4W:ZS
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ No ❑ NA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? yes ❑ NA
I j
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination![]Yes ❑ NA
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Ye NA
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA
Q,5j- 1�' , �;�
Reviewer/Ins ector Name Phone:
Reviewer/inspector �t:::
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

9
Tj
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?❑Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components the CAWMP ily available`? If es, check ❑ Yes [ [:1NA ElNE
the appropirate box.
94
UP ❑Checklists Design ❑ Eler
2 I. Does record keeping need impro ment? If yes, check t e appropriate box below. ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Applicatio eekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil alysis�aste Transfers nual Certification
❑ infall tocking L� Crop Yield ❑ 0 Minute Inspections Monthly and i" Rain Inspections eather Code
522. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Ees El NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 01 Yes No L>A ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes`� ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure.a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No kA ElNE
OtherIssuesr
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? [:1 Yes ino ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead ani is within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �[o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emer enc as required by ElYes'�i o ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard proble . , ver application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Ye o A ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA El NE
Aa. .,� ,r "' � a�-: �� c. k � N3 v,,; �- .+ � J-'� �. xt',� � � E I. ♦ -1 � y. 4 AFA' -k - �y
ihonal Comiinents sindlor Drawingsc
L�
.>11�
C_
C�
12128104

c`9.`5s• -'` -r: }rn F.uS� -
y e C+�', 3'i •�{�t'7E'¢ ��t % -
i - _
vtr.•
- y�"�, v, -s •' -='i �. `'•�' Fox"Sft r ," "if ,`-,• ,:, �- r•
®Divrsioritof Water
t
.Ll
Fac>El>ttyNum�eir;
❑ NE
❑ Yes o A
c7�{
, S Qualrtyrr�
mak• y 'lS1z .i J=, a.. PW 7 rrl]yK }r4 Y..J� n.• -{ 1
QSDtvistatrof Soil Canservattona
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued
and;Water { �
F 4 ther Agency,
��.F:.li-i x�t:'fS.. 'h 314�i"•'fY �S.ttr�+i^t`'�"`.x.ir
-
L: n�. .ff .1: tri l.` �` iP:Y.+' Y :(.�1 Vl
�•�� scrr x 5� 5� ��i�
`Type of Visit Q} Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance j
ji Reason for Visit ®Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral Q Emergency 0
_Tsxr
❑ NE
Fac>El>ttyNum�eir;
❑ NE
❑ Yes o A
c7�{
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued
Other ❑Denied Access I
Date of Visit: epi mmz Arrival Time: � � � .. DepartureTime: a VVV
1 County: Region: �
Farm Name: Owner Email:
_
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility
Contact:
ed Operator: L
Back-up Operator:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: II
Certifi
Integrator-
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certifi
cation Number:
Location of Farm: C Latitude: ❑ ° Longitude: =0=4
❑ I`
znzo* 1W
z tL
,, Design 5 tCurrenf , q � Design ;CurrentDesign' ,Current''
a::
Swrner:Capacity Population ;Wet Poultry' ,; Cqpacity1Populatron ' =Cattle Capacity ..Population
,]E] Wean to Finish . ElLayer
El Farrow
•�
C3 Wean to Feeder ; ❑Non -La er
El Feeder to Finish •
❑ Farrow to Wean . Dry Poultry � r,
❑Farrow to Feeder
-
to Finish
lJ
•�Boars I I
�
.Other
❑ Other
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
Turkeys
❑
Turkey
11
❑ Layers
Poults
❑ Other
Agbairy Cow
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
DEX Cow
El Non -Dairy
Discharees &Stream Facts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure ❑Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If
yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
. Number of Structures:
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (
If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ YeS�N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ Nodi A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [�%q
A
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A
❑ NE
❑ Yes o A
❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued
�
.Other
❑ Other
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
Turkeys
❑
Turkey
11
❑ Layers
Poults
❑ Other
Agbairy Cow
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
DEX Cow
El Non -Dairy
Discharees &Stream Facts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure ❑Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If
yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
. Number of Structures:
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (
If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ YeS�N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ Nodi A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [�%q
A
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A
❑ NE
❑ Yes o A
❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility, Number: — Date of inspection
Waste Collection &,Treatment ..
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): h
Observed Freeboard (in): *"
Liz
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) ����'
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes CP�Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment1 threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El
Bio ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ElNA [INE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) kT
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application t ~
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or co m that need ❑.Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
�]'essive Ponding ydraulic Overload �r6zen Ground etals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
�ZAI-PAN > 10% or 10 lbs al Phosphorus ❑ preto incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
e of Acceptable Crop Window--ffEvidence of Wind Drift plication Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) - � ��N , Cci N k [S� L ; G C � ��
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? *YVeNA
ivin15. Does the recerop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ NA
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'![] Yeo ❑ NA
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o [011NA
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
IReviewer/Inspector Name hl} ,�'.; Phone: I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date:
12128/04 Continued

2
• Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility tail to have all c p=Checklists
the CAWMP dily available? If yes. c eck
the appropirate box. UP Design aps ther
❑ Yes Zlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye Ifo [INA '❑NE
11
21. Does rec rd keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
aste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboar?120 aste Analysis oil Analysis aste Transfers nnual Certification
�ainfall Stocking Crop Yield Minute Inspections oonthly and I" Rain InspectionsWeather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
❑ Yes
�o El NA
ElNE
El Yes
0 No4 'A
❑ NE
49) ❑ Yes
o ElNA
ElNE
❑ YeC1No ItRA
❑ NE
El Ye
o - ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No -M-A
❑ NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of ithin 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection -did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of erZergenc siat' ns as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yeso
❑ NA ❑ NE
,. ❑ Yes,%R1Qo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE.
'=.;. :st. 't x' o"s ♦ ,:� -.'t: ;,"'. yi .. i Js' ? szo .f p & n r: y..;, P• '•-':.i'z= "l '�,'.ti..f- 'L',
Additeonai Comments and/or D.rawin s
. i.. _ �- �, k;� .t �.. .:t�:�}, r„_ 4. ;:sa Jt�.�'3.�...+t�+Fd '!4'sa�u r.��'+�.Li•.�!�i'2:
• l
12/28/04

Cj Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWCB00001 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: Q4/17/2008 Entry Time: 08:00 AM Exit Time: 08:45 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS Owner Email:
Owner: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Mailing Address: 8350 Sherrills Ford Rd Salisbury NC 28147
Physical Address:
Facility Status: n Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°41'30" Longitude: 80°37'30"
From the intersection of Hwy 801 and SR 1526 (Sherrills Ford Rd.), travel east on Sherrills Ford Rd. Headquarters approximately one
mile east on Sherrills Ford Rd.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Jimmy R Horton
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 20960
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ray Horton Phone:
On-site representative Ray Horton Phone:
Primary Inspector: Cindy Safrit Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis: 4/10/2008 - 5.5 IbN/1000gal
11/1512007 - 1.4 IbN/1000gal
Soil Analysis: 1/31/2007 (2006) Check soil analysis for 2007 next inspection.
Calibration due October 1, 2008.
A few updates are needed for WUP. New corn/rye cover PAN etc.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Facility Number: 800001
Inspection Date: 04/17/2008 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 150 150
Total Design Capacity: 150
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WP1 18.00 48.00
Page: 2

lop Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture Facility Number : 800001
Inspection Date: 04117/2008 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ ❑ 0
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ n ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
fl
■
❑
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (ke] large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
❑
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
Q
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
Q
■
n
0.
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? f_i
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Inspection Date: 04/17/2008 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number: 800001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
D
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
F1
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
Q
Application outside of application area?
El
Crop Type 1
Alfalfa
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Cover
Crop Type 3
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Dogue
Soil Type 2
Hiwassee
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n ■
D
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n ■
D
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Q ■
❑
0
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q ■
D
0
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■
D
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Q ■
D
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
n
Page: 4
*,

t Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Inspection Date: 0411712008 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 800001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
In
n
In
n
n■nr0
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
!�
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
n
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
IN
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
e
n
26. Did the facility tail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
0
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rales?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Facility Number: 800001 q
Inspection nate: 0411712008 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
nO► Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ Cl Q
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 0 ❑ Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ n
r
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
E Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800001 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 10/19/2007 Entry Time: 10:50 AM Exit Time: 01:10 PM Incident f#:
Farm Name: Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS Owner Email:
Owner: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Mailing Address: 8350 Sherrills Ford Rd Salisbury NC 28147
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Phone: [phone]
Latitude: 35°41'30" Longitude: e¢°7'20"
From the intersection of Hwy 801 and SR 1526 (Sherrills Ford Rd.), travel east on Sherrills Ford Rd. Headquarters approximately one
mile east on Sherrills Ford Rd.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator. Jimmy R Horton Operator Certification Number: 20960
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Ray Horton
Title Phone
Phone:
On-site representative Correll Hall Phone:
Primary Inspector: Pat Harris Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Inspection Summary:
Two structures on site.Upper "aerated" pond transfers to lower WSP (one WSP in plan).
Waste Analysis 9105/2007-6.7 IbN/1000gal.
2/14/2007 2.41bN/1000gal
1/02/2007 2.0ibN/1000gal
Soil Analysis 1/31/2007 one field calling for lime(one ton/acre).
7)establish grass on upper inside edge of the WSP.
21)Compute PAN totals for entire crop cycle(fall and spring application on rye need to be completed as one crop). Have crop yield
records available.
WUP needs to be updated. New plan should include crop windows for Rye, check PAN allowances for crops, etc...)
Farm and records look good. Thank -you
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Inspection Date: 10/19/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number: 800001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 150 126
Total Design Capacity: 150
Total SSLW: 210,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond
WPI
18.00
36.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Inspection Date: 10/19/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number: 800001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
0
D
discharge?
❑
Structure
❑
n
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
Application Field
❑
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
Other
❑
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
0000
n
improvement?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
o
❑
■
In
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
Q
■
0
D
discharge?
❑
■
❑
n
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
■
n
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe 0000
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
n
Q
Q
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
Q
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800001 owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Inspection Date: 10/19/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number; 800001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
n
PAN?
Q
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
Dogue
Q
Total P2O5?
Hiwassee
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
n
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Sail Type 3
In
Evidence of wind drift?
Q
Application outside of application area?
Alfalfa
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Soil Type 6
Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
(Pastuaej ermuda Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Dogue
Hiwassee
Soil Type 2
Sail Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Q
■
Q
Q
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Q
■
Q
Q
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
Q
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q
■
n
Q
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Q
WUP?
Page: 4

/ Permit: AWC800001
Inspection Date: 10/1912007
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Inspection Type: Operations Review
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number : 800001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n
n
n
n
■nnn
Waste Application?
■
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
rl
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
0
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
....- _ - •- _ -- _ _
V..
AIn
AIA
AIF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n ■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n IN n rl
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ ❑ n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Inspection Date: 10/19/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 800001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n■n0
OMOD
O■QQ
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800001 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Rowan Region: Mooresville__
Date of Visit: 03129/2007 Entry Time:02:30 PM Exit Time: 03:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Piedmont Research StationlNCDACS Owner Email:
Owner: NC Dept Of AgriculturePhone: 704-278-2624
Mailing Address: 8350 ShprrillS0li§i;lu[y NQ ZQ147
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 25°41'30" Longitude:
From the intersection of Hwy 801 and SR 1526 (Sherrills Ford Rd.), travel east on Sherrills Ford Rd. Headquarters approximately one
mile east on Sherrills Ford Rd.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy R Horton Operator Certification Number: 20960
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Jimmy R. Horton Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Jimmy R. Horton Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: .C,17l!:Z35"�t6�
Inspector Signature: Date: r►'Vhi�'��
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
02/14/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.4 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/02/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/31/07 > Soil Analysis
ib
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture Facility Number: 800001
Inspection Date: 03/29/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
W Cattle - Milk Cow 150 128
Total Design Capacity: 150
Total SSi_W: 210,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WP1 18.00 48A0
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture Facility Number. 800001
Inspection Date: 03/29/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
MOO
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
a. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
n
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
f1
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture Facility Number: 800001
Inspection Date: 03/29/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? 0
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
1:1
Crop Type 1
Alfalfa
Crop Type 2
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Matua (Hay)
Crop Type 5
Small Grain
Cover
Crop Type 6
Soybeans
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0 ■ 13
0
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ■ ❑
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■ n
Cl
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■ n
Q
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Page: 4

f
Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture Facility Number : 800041
.i*
Inspection Date: 03/29/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ hl ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections?
F1
Weather code?
Cl
Weekly Freeboard?
fl
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
Q
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
%1
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
fl
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPOES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
0
❑
23, if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an active3y certified operator in charge?
fl
■
❑
Cl
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ 17 ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ n ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ fl ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture Facility Number : 800001
Inspection Date: 03/2912007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? n m n Q
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? Q M n n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800001 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance In5peQ10gQ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Ro an Region: Mooresville
bate of Visit: 11/17/2006 Entry Time:12:30 PM Exit Time: 42:30 PM __ Incident #:
Farm Name: Piedmont Research Stati4n/NCDACS Owner Email:
Owner: NC Der)t_OfA9riculture _ Phone: 704 -27O -2E24
Mailing Address: 925Q Sherrills Ford Rd Salisbury NC 28147
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°41'30" Longitude: 80°37'30"
From the intersection of Hwy 801 and SR 1526 (Sherrills Ford Rd.), travel east on Sherrills Ford Rd. Headquarters approximately one
mile east on Sherrills Ford Rd.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy R Horton Operator Certification Number: 20960
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jimmy R. Horton
On-site representative Jimmy R. Horton
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
�"4fj�a_ V
Inspector Signature: Date:?i_
Secondary Inspector(sj:
—i
Inspection Summary:
09/01/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.1 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/20/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 7.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/12/06 > Soil Analysis
21. Weekly Freeboard records maintained, but must use the designated form (enclosed).
24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in November, 2006.
a
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Aghcutture
inspection Date: 11/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 800001 +
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle r'
Cattle -Milk Cow 150 145 f
_ Total Design Capacity: 150
Total SSLW: -1210,000 w,
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
rite Pond WP1 18.00 24.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture Facility Number : 800001
Inspection Date: 1 1 11 712006 Inspection Type: Complianoe Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges S Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure • ❑
Application Meld
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
Cl
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
Q
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
C3
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
0
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
Q
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
14. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0
■
❑
0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
❑
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Facility Number : 800001
Inspection Date: 11117/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Alfalfa
Crop Type 2
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Matua (Hay)
Crop Type 5
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 6
Soybeans
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

( Permit: AWC800001
Inspection Date: 11/17/2006
Owner -Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Facility Number : 800001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
000
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
000
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
000
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
I❑
0011
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. -Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animal's within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
000
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
0011
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800001 Owner - Facility: NC Dept Of Agriculture
Inspection Date: 11/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 800001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. bid the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
Q
■ 0
Cl
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
0
■ 11
Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
D
■ 0
Q
Page: 6

W A rF9
Michael F. Easley, Governor
O�
Q
William G. floss Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
D �
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
NC Dept of Agriculture
Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd
Salisbury NC 281
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800001
OCT 1 2004 Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
ND DEPT OF r-i�(r'��iENT Storage and Application System
AND NATURAL RESOURCES Rowan County
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFF'
Dear NC Dept of Agriculture:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on January 27, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to NC Dept
of Agriculture, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC800001 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS, located in Rowan County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than an annual average of 150 Dairy cattle and the application to land as
specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful. attention to the record keeping
and monitorinp, conditions in this ermit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section - Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.ne.us 'r
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper �I Y%��au Ltly�jrlly

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at (9I9) 715-6698.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC800001
APS Central Files

Type of Visit A Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for VisitPK Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: OS Arrival Time: I W! 00 1 Departure Time: County: Region:'I"�
Farm Name: NG D5R + P41" C., 14, Wt p:J.�•rf' Owner Email:
Owner Name: a rj rr B Phone:
1
Mailing Address: �_ SD �jfj t �hf s r'n•d J?4� N Ce
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ►--m/0. /�fO2 ���^' Title: d� Phone No: -.W.
Onsite Representative: �� Integrator:
Certified Operator: �� Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =' =' = Longitude: = ° =
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
�I ❑ Non -La er
Other
❑ Other—.�----- .—�-- --
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
®
Dairy Cow I KO
❑ Dai Calf
❑ Dairy Heifej
7Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: =I
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
IN No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: "60 — j Date of Inspection -1 -o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: UwAak
Spillway?: A/ 0
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 Q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes JR] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes �Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes JK No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 'E] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes fRNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) /1� C�t;N Sr �A4 C.Y�L�il9wa S
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
1,�@ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[]
Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
JR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
w " N_
zl
•oS 6•I
D'lo 'as 1."7
11-M - oLf 1,
Reviewer/Inspector Name I " (df t '°:`)ra Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: A - /K- o :r-
12128104
12/28/04 Continued

r
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes I@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Adtlitiohal Goinments and/or Drawings:
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
R] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
SPao
;.NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
IN No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
J9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
©No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes ©No El NA [__1 NE
12/28/04

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
September 7, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
Return Receipt Requested
Piedmont Research Station
Attn: Mr. Ray Horton
8350 Sherrils Ford Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Subject: Rescinding of Notice of Violation (NOV)
Facility#: 80-1
Piedmont Research Station/Site Inspection
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Horton:
On August 25, 2004, your facility was issued a Notice of Violation for applications made in
April of 2004. On September 1, 2004, we received the document from the NCDA & CS
Agronomic Division explaining their computer error resulting in your violation. Based on this
information I am rescinding the NOV you were issued in August.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
cc: Rowan County SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
File

�eu�ru�
Britt Cobb North Carolina
Commissioner Department of Agriculture
N. David Smith and Consumer Services
Deputy Commissioner
Research Stations Division
August 30, 2004
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section ' F:
Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Attention: Mr. William Burke
Dear Mr. Burke: "
Carl V. Tart, Jr.
Assistant Commissioner
Dr. Sandra J. Maddox
Director
Joe K. Hampton
Superintendent
NG DEPT. OF ENVIROl+l ENT
AND NATURAL
V�1O RESOURCES
SEP - 1 2004
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DWO-GROUNDWATER SECTION
Thank you for visiting our facility on'Audust 18,_'2004. During your visit we were unable to
document an animal waste analysis for.April,2004. Subsequent to your visit we learned the
report (W08266) was processed on 4/13/2004 but had a date in July displayed on the online
system. As we have discussed by phone, I hope the attached letter from the Agronomic
Division is acceptable as an explanation for this issue.
While we have traditionally sampled in January, April, and August, we are adapting your
suggestion and will sample quarterly to insure that we have some overlap between sample
analysis.
Again, thank you.
J KHlar
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Joe K. Hampton
Slaperinteriderat.
Joe. Hamplon@ncmait net
PIEDMONT RESEARCH STATION
8350 Sherrills Ford Road Salisbury, NC 28147-7579
[phone] • FAX: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Britt Cobb
Commissioner
Attn: Joe Hampton
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Road
Salisbury, NC 28147-7579
August 27, 2004
Mr. Hampton:
North Carolina Department of Agriculture
and Consumer Services
Agronomic Division
Dr. Richard C. Reich
Director
During July 2004; the NCDA & CS Agronomic Division experienced a computer hardware failure. As a result of this
failure, we restored a number of reports including your report W08266 (fiscal year 2004). This restoration has caused the
online reports to display the day they were updated (i.e. restored), rather than the time period they were analyzed. Fortunately,
the internal record system has the actual dates of submission and analysis. Waste report W08266 was received April 12, 2004,
and analyzed/printed April 13, 2004. If there are.other inquiries, please call me.
Shaun Casteel
NCDA& CS Agronomist
919-733-2655
Enclosures: W08266 - fiscal year 2004, printed 8127104
1040 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1040
[phone] 0 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit Q Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number $o f Date of Visit: Time:
=Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................
Farm Name: ...A,j WW RR t I.:.�r ��`..r� �.'.4"'........................................ County:.. '. �"'..................................................................
Owner Name:... N G'7f... .. ,Phone No:............................
.................`.................................................................................................................................
Mailing Address:...... .35 a SR Aj.'-.....Fwad.....`rliz.:!!� ............... ....
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:....................... ..... Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative:............................................................................................................ Integrator: ............................................
Certified Operator:.......rz !...............p.'!r��o�'....._........................................................ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 64 Longitude • 6 44
Discharges & Stream (Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ............ I..................... ............---........................................................
Freeboard (inches):
12/12/03
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structure 6
Continued

ti
Facility Number: 6!P ^ t Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes © No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes gj No
❑ Excessive Ponding
44 ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [I Copper and/or Zinc
`
12. Crop type _1Y BW-4wf R4,4 '1 &V V -WA
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes m No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes © No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes © No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes No
Air Quality representative immediately.
.,..;.i,'s;i:d`9;i:s11iC.�VN 44<Y'a,El�:�,i.l'<: tt:4?. 3'.S. :'i`'w:44i-. ,_ <,., id34:is•.,�,s�t�e:.fC4S3'fr.E<,.....z..,.;°i°St3CY'a'.:t°�F.i�',f1'i.""'<i'K."I:aklu.`.1ttY„+SN�ttl�l:'J#:":1i 'a ':z-.,......., .AA.. ,..6'.,.%3iit ,. -6 ;f`.}�-ii"-l'.�;: �'..t"i3`=; rts.i £#3"#i�i;�tt ��E-'��'.En, .4 �Ylt'�
Comments (referqueshon'#)•)E;xplaunaugy3�YFS siaEswersandlorany recanamenrlat.ons or�any�otherfcotnment4. wk`µ E;j ?f ;�,tpw
"s',,','ew:4,t4?<s,°S;.ii�v
xts-
YUse drawtngst of,faeility tohlietter expl� situataar�.s.t;{use additsonat ag ,:as nece ry)� `, ❑Field COPY ❑Final Notes ,� s4 ,; ;',;F
�b� 'i„1.1.§34:tr;ssE . at ?<r lyii.fr' t. i4, g� , ll ,814 k . , s� �4i`-N F 3 kc • r» .9 ;s. .{};:,'1,
E., t, _ i r z�,•4��iLfib r-�u�.4d _,Eit,. ..M4t"n•,a<<�: �!fi�.�i .?r��a:�i.,. ,i§„:n3 i"i §�.r�;�°8a.tlLi l�r§tti� ,:t i°sd�� 4��.�,�,u-liS2�x ?<,a�F'
tt rypnrs;,rm' :S t §n*#E;,q}R���{ sr nf a an ec
i 4 i 4 ”#I yt�C.�4# xP� �t.l.`$,&' 344 P�i'� >,wi'ElaES`
Reviewer/Ins ector Name iy, # r� t� ii�( ,.;<,9�q.`ff� ra'rr�..,rs,•4
P 5 Y d¢ss Sof. SHd a: ¢1i� ts. i1.0 JU<. �i _ 1k ua iS LS1h Abu 1§6..L ..�Y t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ` Date:
12112103 Continued

s
j Facility Number: go r 1 Date of Inspection -1Tv `l
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ;@ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes © No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
r i
ddition'alp'Coriiriieritstanti/orSt`:.Drawinppµs i, .. ��,{t�;§4I,.Q } "t $;yy+}�`i>sfF,f,,,8 '")��
�5,.t
a?t,hFbn,.:, fie3„�,tSISEI�f°e§iff�ili :,3:99x15't3t9i:A.it ,E�'Rlia'rd: Rxai�i�i7.i;41S ¢°c :s§E:Yi«.��'
—Vsrc *Del Rem A-P"y'
-'�iKAj,�" MA.k ;n/ �pP%�� 04y '/d ��r.,F� Itr�Ae A��S M.r�Ik,[
T
12112103

�,M A ] F Michael F. Easley, Governor
9Ir William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
pNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O
000
[PNV
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
4 C
AQUWER PROTECTION SECTION
August 25, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
Return Receipt Requested
Piedmont Research Station
Attn: Mr. Ray Horton
8350 Sherrils Ford Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
It
Subject: Notice of Violation (NOV)
Facility#: 80-1
Piedmont Research Station/Site Inspection
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Horton:
Chapter 143, North Carolina General Statutes, authorizes and directs the Environmental
Management Commission of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources to protect and
preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of Water Quality (division) has the
delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control rules. This letter is a standard notification and is
intended to advise you of the legal requirements under North Carolina law.
Mr. William Burke of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 18,
2004. During the inspection it was noted that you did not have a compliant waste analysis for
applications made in April and May of 2004. Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.10 (C), this letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation for the following:
• Failure to obtain an animal waste analysis within 60 days before or after the application
of waste. This is a violation of Section III #4 of your general permit
Please submit a written response to this Office by September 8, 2004 indicating the actions
taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent the violation from occurring in the future.
Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement action for these violations. Also be advised that North Carolina General Statutes
provide for civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation per day for noncompliance with state
environmental laws and regulations, and/or criminal penalties.
One
No Carolina
Division of Water Quality / Aquifer Protection Section / Mooresville Regional Office Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] o0hCarol in
919 North Main Street. Mooresville, NC 28115 Internet: htt :IJ w.ehnr.state.nc.us F/ a ll

f .4
Piedmont Research Station NOV
8/25/2004
2
Please address your response to the attention of Mr. Burke. It is also requested that your
response reference the date and subject of this NOV, as well as the facility number. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Burke at [phone].
Sincerely, �.
z
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Regional Aquifer Protection. Supervisor
cc: Rowan County SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
File

r � WATF Michael F. Easley6Ge-q.,
"
r 0 Rp(� William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
�? r
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
-r Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
September 22, 2003
Mr. Raymond Coltrain
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28144
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Certificate of Coverage AWC800001
Ag. Exp. Station, Facility #: 80-1
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Coltrain:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on September 18,
2003. Based on his observations the facility appeared to be well operated and maintain, and the records
were complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
. NGDElR
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

�iotn '� � •} �ii YL- � FTT �i i 5 1. � .iR �.t i
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility' Number 8U 1 Date of Visit: 09/1R/2[lfl3 Time:
l
....�.� Q Nfot O erational O Below Threshold
Permitted M Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated ur :khoN-e Threshold:
Farm Name: County:
Oiiner Name: __.� ]�S�tp�tLC111tYtP�---_-_--- Phone Vo: fIA�Z:Jai_ZGZI_--------------------------
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: .......... .... .... ....... .....Title. Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: R,dyDuAdD,..._.......—_....-C4tltltll Operator Certification Number: �fl!�a�.-----•---
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of HT% -v 80 1 and SR 1526 (Sherrills Ford Rd.), travel east on Sherrills Ford Rd. Headquarters
approximately one mile east on Sherrills Ford Rd. w
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Lonhitude $U 37 30 _
Design Current
Swine' Canacih• Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ olts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry' Ca acih Population Cattle Cu acihPopulation
❑ Laver ® Dain' 1 50 11O
❑ Non -Laver ❑Nun -Dain-
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 154
Total SSLW 210,000
Number of Lagoons 2 ® Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area IN Sprav Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps 0 [D --No Li uid Waste Management Svirtem
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ 5pra`• Neld ❑ Otlter
a. If discharue is observed_ was the conveywice man-made:'
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notif DWQ )
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon aysteni? (If yes_ notih- DWQ )
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway a-
Stntcutre I Structure 2 `tmcture 'Structure 4 '-,mmure 5
Identifier: ..... ....... ...... - - -
Freeboard i metes r:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
LJ Yes C No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ON o
Yes ® No
Yes ® No
Structure

Facility Number: 80— t
Date of Inspection 0911$!21103
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Antslication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding []PAN ❑Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Rye
[1. Dottie receiving crops differ NN itlt those designated its the Certified Aninuil Waste Ivl ana�,ement Plan (CAI'kW 1° ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required_Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
[1. Dottie receiving crops differ NN itlt those designated its the Certified Aninuil Waste Ivl ana�,ement Plan (CAI'kW 1° ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required_Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments: refer to � gestin Lg
( ��tj VXTIO z is n�anX " m S.a ` era'�`ai�iillar un "� omtnenilntioria o a y of er comments
rr�S }kn"I:ti. k�ie'y�t G
ilBe:drawings of facility 0 better ex IBM Ituations.;(use addltl0asl pages as neeessary):�F�} ❑Field Co ❑ Flluil Nates
+
�L'
THE FACILITY WAS WELL MAINTAINED AND RECORDS APPEARED TO BE COMPLETE.
Rei-iem-er/Inspector Name Alan Johson
7`/6 U5

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish Jo continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC 'are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresvi Ile Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Rowan County Health Department
---Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC800001
NDPU Files ��� q���Al
ew
r * Ift RESOUR
PRI 'Al oFFjCE
�fAY 1
92003
. 9111
2003
1
PJAM.1549
O&CTf0U

NC Dept of Agriculture
Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS
8350 Sherriils Ford Rd
Salisbury NC 28147
Dear NC Dept of Agriculture:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E.. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800001
Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
On April 28, 2003, ,the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date'to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on January 27, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to NC Dept
of Agriculture, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC800001 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Piedmont Research Station/NCDACS, located in Rowan County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than an annual average of 150 Dairycattle and the application to land as
specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by. this COC (as provided above) will require a modifcation.to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
NTD M T
Internet http:Nh2o.enr.state. nc,us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

'ANZH26I, IMS= 20610=WMT PLAN CZRTS7ZCATI02i PGR Z=ST1 M Pt+ LOTS
"Please retura the completed fora to the Division of Eaviroamantal Management
.he addrass on the reverse side of this foam
Name of fano (Please print) : _ - '-Piedmont Research Station W
Mailing Address: 8350 Sherri is Ford—Road, Sa Lsourv, i a
Phone No. 704-778-2624 `
Cunt (of farts)
:'a_-= location: Latitu e- and Longitude: ==edl . also.
,please attach a copy of a county roaa map with t'' -on i.dencified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy,
Desis,--z. capacity (numher of animals) :
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.)
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres): So
aaaaaaaaaagaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaamaaaaaasaamaaaaaaaa
Technical Specialist certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6r 0005; Y certify that Che
existing animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal
waste management plan that meets the operation and maintenance standards and
specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA -Sail
Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conserracian
Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001.-.0005. The
following elements and their corresponding minimum c=iterra have been ver- :_
by me or other designated tec:nnical specialists and are included in the plan as
applicable: minimum separations (buffers), adequate quantity and amount of land
for waste utilization (or use of third party); access or ownership Of proper
waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application
rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from
stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storax.
Naum of Technical Specialist (P1a Print): t] 1D r= P_
ffiliation (Agency): US D A - AWCAs
Z7Z7-C O! D CoWCaeM c 1
Address: SA��� N 814 Phone No.65CL (e3- -x(004 _
signature: Date:., 12-14 5 -
==Maaoasasaaaamasaasasaagaagaq gaaaaq aaaaggwsaaaasaaaeestaaaasasaaaaaasaa
owaes/Han:tQer A,greemeat
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plays for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any. -expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will
require a new. certification to be submitted to the Division of Environml
enta
Management before the new AY11mals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be ao discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state either directly through a man-made conveyance or through runoff from a
storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storax. The`; approved plan will
be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation
District.
at
Hama of Lead Omer (Please Print): N•, C. Department of Agriculture
Signaturss Date: 12/15/95
Name of l[assaQ.r, iff t from owner (Please print) : Raymond D. Coitrain
Signature: _ Date: 12/15/95---
KAU: A o in land ownershipr
requires notification or +a pas+ a 1�ication
(if the approvsd plan _is ..changed) rri.thia ..68 _days of a .title traaetfe�r.
- - w- s^. :b �Qd
EM USE ONLY s ACES t
�''"'., _i.-..! 1-•� � Sk` v.yw�: ,j�... sti.1� ��. _.app ^. ��. µ - _` L '^` * -. _� q.SY�+",R "a k IVQI�t IJJ �'.�S:�" l '¢�Ci��� 1 {'lf'Fl7

;a: `jr Amor:aj o+ ;faste Pro uce Per `�Yearfga4Ions; ftp, tons, ~e_..
.. Y .r _T��Le D-4 �r.•e Der Pater �' T'nrre Fi? �nwc
n=i v$Zc t^e z�)ove z-,mcun_ of waste ;S a h..o job. yyou should e?
�?'r
IlI i1C ave a5t'-C�~==-= B'�`�' �'.«<e:lt tD c_ "1 V t:iH *.ra5'� =_^. 2 �_T:1�� V
,e - - - -
s
1.TaILiT 2 Lid c`�52:: `v�T 1.� T s '.'-I=;r' •i.�
�II
.=-c is � z:1OL;5 :1Di ' Qa�. _ � S i-vYS2=: � D �LT:1CSl:'"'2 -�AD�2 �_� �Li-1� �C.?•.�
z_anS = : OO�i`ti = =%L2=LLS/hem sq-L--T-x
:8aa �e� `o�il�:.:= l�:.Gl :iib:�'*:h L`i'p-L:'cl.�' =rIIciC D-Unouly
�cfll:fo�S�:yi
• Sgp1 7
L b .^ S Z ia4b
... f •�Za 'SIiC� EFTS �SIIDT`rE�J1Po�a .:vd �"►nII1It7a�d oTsB�; o :rII:1C�'
�� � �M��,�r41� �� ;;,,�:.�,�dy;:�: fir. .:� :. o ;��:•.
i97. '!E ,��5�.:]'�.."r�y1� C'G,rr+`w=��''Q ,;oY4.rw.�: ...,. F.'a' . a-%1:�-,,. Yf; R:� .Sf�,.:�'•�..�.:�'a"�:F� -�,„••T,"_ .
w. r ._...._..r,.
799.350 s
I C;
_.a?s
5,329
�
waste/ani mal/vear =_4Q
wasta/an •zzlly=__r=,350
_an
was �e/_ ear.
�
W „_
Amcan- C- 'D12=1
ACS I a%.T a N; A --Oce (?;LN) Prmduce_n_
•Z• e_r Yea=
0 V Q -ai
Va = -ems I a
=a ae'er rocuced
Per T e ir
�p^a Is xr 7�Irs. ;=Vii/zZ
=W-'IYTSCR-T�Lc=-L�Z���{ti'�Nr
GL_ee 5t-4.
n�.11y=ter 1,400
6= J1
_=5 . aPV/v2== .
n=i v$Zc t^e z�)ove z-,mcun_ of waste ;S a h..o job. yyou should e?
�?'r
IlI i1C ave a5t'-C�~==-= B'�`�' �'.«<e:lt tD c_ "1 V t:iH *.ra5'� =_^. 2 �_T:1�� V
,e - - - -
s
1.TaILiT 2 Lid c`�52:: `v�T 1.� T s '.'-I=;r' •i.�
�II
.=-c is � z:1OL;5 :1Di ' Qa�. _ � S i-vYS2=: � D �LT:1CSl:'"'2 -�AD�2 �_� �Li-1� �C.?•.�
z_anS = : OO�i`ti = =%L2=LLS/hem sq-L--T-x
:8aa �e� `o�il�:.:= l�:.Gl :iib:�'*:h L`i'p-L:'cl.�' =rIIciC D-Unouly
�cfll:fo�S�:yi
• Sgp1 7
L b .^ S Z ia4b
... f •�Za 'SIiC� EFTS �SIIDT`rE�J1Po�a .:vd �"►nII1It7a�d oTsB�; o :rII:1C�'
�� � �M��,�r41� �� ;;,,�:.�,�dy;:�: fir. .:� :. o ;��:•.
i97. '!E ,��5�.:]'�.."r�y1� C'G,rr+`w=��''Q ,;oY4.rw.�: ...,. F.'a' . a-%1:�-,,. Yf; R:� .Sf�,.:�'•�..�.:�'a"�:F� -�,„••T,"_ .
w. r ._...._..r,.

J
ATTACHMENT
page '_
WASTE UTILIZATION PIAN
Producer p.Q�OA(>l, �'P-!5ZC'CC)Vv�a County_
Address 03'jJQ 5; InAn ion) find of Operation
s�1�S�,N Nc2cr+��
Type of Waste Facility
Your animal waste management facility has been designed .or a
given storage capaciy . When the waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be used to _educe the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on !the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several =actors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
envircnmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more Nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rales and leaching potental. Waste shall not be applied zo
land•eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
f_..zen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff no
surface waters. ;Mind conditions should also be considered nz
avcid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of vunrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing trop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. injecting the waste
or disking Will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on :he
following:
Amount of waste Produced per Year. y�
_JJQ_animals x ±J "waste / animal/yr
produced.
.to.tal,. was,.e-.Y
1 170
JAN 2 7 2003
NON -DISCHARGE PERVIT TNG

Amount o N'troaen Produced Per ea :
animals x lbs N/animal/yr =
?ago 7
total N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for days cf
storage. ':herefore, it will need to be pumped every
months.
The following acreage for waste application will be needed
based an the crop to be grown and surface application:
Field soil Croo Realistic L.'a. M Acres Lbs. M Month of
Type Tleld Per Ac. Utilized Application
Narrative of Operation
TOTAL I I I
Amuit of M Preotxee l I�
surplus or Deficit i
I rCTz 0n,
JA' 2 7 20031
L NON-D;SCH,iii E tPERvA TTING
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District Offrce--afler-you- ---
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying
waste.
Prepared by
Concurred it
(Corny to producer and Copy to case file)
Title Date
Date

1
PRO IC i... ,4AME Piedmont Research Station
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP REALISTIC_YIELD Lbs.N per Ac. ACRES Lbs. N Utilized
ssrxsa=ono.�=_=====s=a�ea��-=====aaa�=�_--cs�tis,��3aaQaea���sx��r_aer�ss�s=R=�=a�===oort�ans=tas�R ne
1810 D4
DOA
Hlwassee Fescue / Pasture 5 Tons / ac.
Hlwassee Fescue / P -01 S Torts 1 ac.
250
250
_t4.13.
-9 9- �•
D68
Htwassee
Alfalfa �9
st '�
Tons 1 so.
12��2¢0
8-W '
DOC
Hlwassee
mal! G►sirt,�or+ti
8 Tons 1 sc.
13 l.2�io
98-4 75
7S
DOC
Hiwassee
espedezq/['or�
4 Tons / ac.
go/_7A°
9,9-
D7
Dogue
emnuda Pastu �C
a Tons lac.
300/ °
a 9= �•
DT
Dogue As
Rye / Pasture c'or,-
6 Torts / ac.
300��
DO$
Hiwassee
Com Silage
20 Tons I ac.
240
12 -$
DO
Hlwassee
Small Grain
8 Tons I ac.
130
0
D8
Htwassee
Soy Beans
40 bu. / ac.
P-190
42-0-8.0
D10
Riverview
Com Silage
20 Tons / ac.
240
4+..6-%d,4'
2 D11
C��
Dogue
Bermuda Pasture
6 Tons /aa
300
.� to,
/o,
D11
Dogue
Rye / Pasture
9 Tons / no.
300
441~
D12A
Hiwassee
Rye / Pasturo eN`A'
O Tons / so.
30
*
-&.& % s'
0128
Hlwassee
Matua / Paslurel*rk'
5 Tons / ac.
2
-8:0- tv
All of the solid waste Is sold to a third party ( see Third Party Agreement form)
TOTAL
g0
and removed from the farm.
Amount of N produced
Deficit of N
Based on Waste Analysis Report with
N at 2.4 lbs, per 1,000 gallons Irrigated
7-
0
q
�n
C,3
7)
J
Z
0
-vU
'Qgg- 11-4-.4
1,125 1'
X89 7x °
fie- 87�
.qiw J�;f0.
420
4�6t39- 1040 }
f59O' 6®%
8698• /12 ,;:
2s,e18 �c��r
2,91e lbs. of N •
23,902 lbs. of N
On fields where corn silage Is planted apply 240 lbs. of N 1 ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where small grain is planted apply 130 lbs, of N / so., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where rye Is planted apply 300 lbs. of N / ac, no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where soybeans Is planted apply 160 lbs. of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where fescue Is grown apply 250 ft. of N / am If field Is used for hay and 110 lbs. of N / ac. If is used for pasture.
On fiatds where bermuds Is gmwn apply 300 lbs. of N / or., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where mafus grass Is grain apply 250 lbs. of N / am, no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where alfalfa Is gnown'apply 120 lbs. of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where lespedeza is grown 80 lbs. of N / ac., no mora than 30 days before planting.
applications should be made In the following months for each crop.
Corn
� , r
Small Grain
-September - November
�
I.7
N3
,-
Bermuda
-April - October
Matua
- April - October
ow
:7
-vU
'Qgg- 11-4-.4
1,125 1'
X89 7x °
fie- 87�
.qiw J�;f0.
420
4�6t39- 1040 }
f59O' 6®%
8698• /12 ,;:
2s,e18 �c��r
2,91e lbs. of N •
23,902 lbs. of N
On fields where corn silage Is planted apply 240 lbs. of N 1 ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where small grain is planted apply 130 lbs, of N / so., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where rye Is planted apply 300 lbs. of N / ac, no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where soybeans Is planted apply 160 lbs. of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where fescue Is grown apply 250 ft. of N / am If field Is used for hay and 110 lbs. of N / ac. If is used for pasture.
On fiatds where bermuds Is gmwn apply 300 lbs. of N / or., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where mafus grass Is grain apply 250 lbs. of N / am, no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where alfalfa Is gnown'apply 120 lbs. of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where lespedeza is grown 80 lbs. of N / ac., no mora than 30 days before planting.
applications should be made In the following months for each crop.
Corn
- Mardi - July
Small Grain
-September - November
Soybeans
- April - June
Fescue
-March - June / August - November
Bermuda
-April - October
Matua
- April - October
�0 J, * ANIC 67 49000 /
/j �� �•�F'� �/ S Ui r�'l'l�d ��
�N�� �_�?-�
Ft..4S.D1AtB''�

Lndowser/Operalor Nage:
Address:
Telephone:
TABLE 1 -Field Specifications
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
-7pIED M0 S = A trh Sr7-R . Countr lro►� ArJ
35O S rr, 5 _-.
+ 1 DaW jQ=4-q j_ _
70H- 101 (e -54 foo -
mfr al
Ims
ww"1er
Appns4aah
Malimam
Unshk She
o
acres
Slope
Soni (%)
C ■
Mar4nUm
AppUMUn
Rai
aw%r)
aRaslauun
Arrmalson
Per 1+fLstion
4C�v3
oxi-)
Coaunenla
0-30
O .3S
2-2-
11 +1
Ftrx,x; AIiftIFai s
6.30
6.s0 16.75
O- Z
71er-perD
11.0
µ _
COP -#a; 5% •. 6"
O. 30
O .5-0-0.745-
5-a-0. 4Zo
2-0.6
FIIF- i o-
0-oapj— 51g
6.55-
o. GO -0_,
a
d .3a
6-50-0.7
;I
Ismattnhw map. v
2Total field acreage minus regwred buffer areas.
3Rdw to N. C. Irrigation Guide. Field Office Technical Guide, Section p G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
=' L--' NRCS. NC
G� JUNE, 1996
0
n
r+
t
0
1
ID
0
0
0
N
V
X
0
E
N
X
n
0
V
0
41

-. a r! • ��• l�Y I, .v,..�`I
�', r :Wl.�: i k'i,gt:'r'"�ii�:3 ''1:���. �� 1r.�Y!'k��•=�SY�
v _
�� •� '� .�'i' r.�L 14'4.. ��
:�'�M iV•' H•r. y1` �: - '+� ., '. 'i• t;'i:',�� '��.. r Yf"•••
�% '`� t f , rrq 1 `� �~ ' ` `� -ra �FVA� a'• ,rte. ��� �'� Y'�
Yv i4: �r ii;�- - i ' si ]••tl j,' ! ,3" . 's : �� � ; . 1 fin; � -; � i! '•• -t i
1��, terra, .n`u ,� ,'�' !`�''. ; ��� {���`'��,ifr 7r� �. • :��1.
,'F sw � � .Y�4 4 ��- :i x.y1 �-�•.`µ' + r+S,r'p�- i � iti x ��• i � � � ?' -
�� ��� - -1•',•`_F i• S%-1: � ` `f, �\T•Y 1� •;�l t'it 'i'ry '.�.r , }'_'.�
t ` ''�,•r fr, �� � •� �KE3'" rfl J�-�'f���'-r:�y � � _. ,/{ t?r✓15 !! �1 ♦ _ }y �•. .�
:�` �1�is •I "� :�'f Y. j�n5��
„K
`.. ,t.
.i.•r. ,�. � .:aijy 'l i • yA �j� �::. ;.•si,yr < • � • t � ti� : �'
r
a
,�� fD�✓l�ai�y !' � 4FF. 141 `� ! ,SFS r.t _
`t -• f ��!!•s i jj'i' :d1'1l� - .�rl'. • 'Yi'. — f/•l,.'.�
�< •aye � _ _ ,� •'# .;��' �',:F .k. i.•,.�'. �; r' tr '
-i, .1 �yp*�r�� F� .L f �' _ � ; -{ •i' � � ,x,•'11„ � ti \ ii �-!_4, .
Y•, rr""'a' F ° } - ;r t ; �1 E SgTS Tr+,''„'''T , s''r, `'�:
,� {,�� !• }, •,�' \ �-; �� � fes!AM q.:';•-
IK
� �-•��+[? �; _¢ ,�,:.moi-''Yrr�.,�.-1 '�' "S ,v y j 3� `jf�r^r��� yti.
40 IVTA
40
.J d, 1, "i r' � ' - ,rl�r�t�:'�.• I �r ; 1l`,1:�,=: rf�,: Ys a•, r' "�,:�'h r� } ;11'•--'.
•,', �q+F_5`� ''T�Y�'�1r'{'..iti::'.s µ'., •i- +�vr.V r .} 1: +Si �4�A: .',�
7, ' i. . ; s lr,.. '.,••n . ' • ,,. 1!• `� 1{, I ,b '� r �. t ..
7 F''y-1 �r � :�. � , 1 -r '�] C �:” t" �ry l �}?1,4 4 'C :�vTr. ��' '� � S•��
.i i.'��-. � 7 jJ y � ti. - 4. !.'•.i'i; �' �L"• ._ i r:,�Y, -': �. �.. " �e-.?” 1 S i
�' ,i {�'1y ice;,, ,, a;r .��,+,•, ,� '�,:_ .' ti;+,. } 1
z.• Y.: } � � r�'S .•YS. � r y�r^ + •� �s�[`clay " ,, TI
iolth \ }
Ant
MIN
r3 z-
L�` •sem•, l.! ��; � ,.�y, r' � c . r

�R[cR .� n
��* piedmont Research St$iIo
C.) 8350 Sher rills Ford Road
Saltsbury, North Carolina 2817
• � C]�e�-1 f � C��2 C!1
G
Cs's r C36 �Z3 i3�
z. x X16
1 5CIT
`
_S4 IL
a �6
f
iOYr.....1,' 67
10rhld
�y � 7(a } 'fey' ��kF •i'_ ., � r + JJ '
03.4
�.
F1� ■ [ OeJ�
- ft,
\\\\\ io0
B�
�,,�
Cvvvv
.els
100 �n5a3 M1
,
T; 1. �•�~.�` •��- f'{ ,3 __ -�,� vv
� i 1144

o�oF w A rF9Q�
d �
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28144
Subject:
Dear Mr. Coltrain:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. doss, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.. Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 16, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
Piedmont Res. Sta., Facility #: 80-1
Rowan County, NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
Vaw
*A
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johnson
Environmental Specialist II
tf�l
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 26115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 22, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RE IPT REQUESTED
NC Dept o Agr��ture
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd
Salisbury NC 28144
Farm Number: 80 - 1
Dear NC Dept of Agriculture:
'X'A
A4 0 02
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Piedmont Research Station, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC,
must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter,
your farm has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
cerely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville-Regional_Offim-Wo encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 28, 2000
Raymond Coltrain
8350 Sherills Ford Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28144
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Piedmont Exp. Station, Facility #: 80-1
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Coltrain:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on June 27, 2000. Based on his observations the facility appeared to be in good
shape, and the files appeared to be complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the
inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Enc.
cc: File
.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
"elf �.
�-y 919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOO ReSVILL e, NORTH C.AAOLINA 26115
� i e° i. �i ; "4s < r
PHONe [phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% R4CYCLe O/1095 POST -CONSUMER PAPER

ID nil of Soil and Water:Conservation .- Operation'.
[rDtvlsion•ofsoden Water Cotreserxatzon Co liaace
INAM o `Water Quail -:.C,6' i1i nze nspectian r?a +xh �--
;,� UtherlAg9 :onievnevr�
-xwti ;
Routine O Complaint O Follow -u of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number j Date of Inspection
t Time of Inspection d r 3 ?A hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted 1' Certified C3 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered 113 Not Operational Date last Operated .
Farm Name: ... ........ WA....�..... ..51t1.c].11 .......t 15{ � 5�!1......
County: ........... d.4 .c.v. .......... .......................:..
Owner Name ....... .IY..L......�k .. .P ... ►......... aa.,. .................................................. Phone No: .........�.Z-.
Faciiin, Contact: ... Title Phone No: ....................
Mailing Address: S
yy
...............W......� C.lC�C ..�.......r.1._�.SrS�CY........ !��...
Onsite Representative: •-- t•�r �C_�Ck,c l!� Integrator :...................
Certified Operator . a K$A..r C.b 1.4-r xv..„- •_....,••, Operator Certification Number:...., ca33.
n of Farm: 1A40 (dZ% 1 5_C
.................................................... ...................................... ............-_......................_....._........................ .............._......................._....................._..............._. ................_.....
:
......
............................................................._......................_..................................._.._.._....__......_..._.._................._.................................._....................._...................._............
ude • �° �•• Longitude • �•°'
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
1:1Wcan Lo F—_eder I
I] Feeder to Finish_
I� Farrow to Wean I I
I] Farrow to Feed_
I� Farrow to Finish I j
I� Gilts I I
I! J Boars I
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca actPopulation Cattle Capacity_ Population
i❑ Laver JaDairy
�❑ Non -Laver I j ❑ Non -Dairy
Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons I,:] Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Fieid Are::
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I] No Liquid Waste Management System
fiischargec� & Stream Imnacts
l . Is any discharge observed from any part OF the operation?
Dischargc originated a:: ❑ Lagoon El Spray Field ❑ Other
a. It' discharge is ohserved. y:as the comvevarice rnan-made?
If dischurgc is ooscrvcd. did it reach Water OF the Stat,? (I4'vcs. notify DWQ)
I`uis iizrge it; e�oserv_e. what is the estimated flow in—al/min'
Dres dischar,.,e nvpas a lagoon system° (If yes. noLik, T_ Q)
is there cviderc: of nag: discharg. from any ear, o- the ancration"
Were there am• adverse imoac[z or potcndai adverse irnoacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharse?
�k ast- Coliection & Treatment
4. is storacc capacity• (freeboard outs storm. storage) less than adequate" ❑ Spillv~a�
Si-.Uclurc I Structure 2 StrUCtur_ Structure 4 Structure 5
Idcntiticr:
src ha:trd t in hest: ........................ ........................ ............ ......................... .......... ................. ................... ....................................
Ar � them• any immediate threats to the integrity o; an% crf the structure; obsen-ed? Cie! uecs, sever: erosion.
seed 2e, etc t
Yes 1�,No
ID Yes i 1 No
1-1 Yes 1 1 No
No
J Yes �_ No
�i Yes, No
LJ Yes S?2?tio
Structure r
YepV'V'
Continued or rg:7k

,65ty 'umber: — bate of tn,spcction Printed on:
5. Are there an immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-siie which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management of
closure pian'?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
4/24/2000
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
b' -erste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Ponding [IPAN
12. Crop type (re7,rn _ V�cfCrra_55 1 p .-1A..,I X
❑ Yes ) 1 No
❑ Yes kNo
❑
YesNo
❑ Yes '4No
❑ Yes �q No
❑ Yes �61No
❑ Yes fVNo
I3. Do the receivingcrops differ wA those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes )gNo
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes kNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
XNo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ANo
Required
Records & Documents
I7.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & GeneraI Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Lk No
t S.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
tCA No
! 9.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
'F< -No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with'any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
�2LNo
? I .
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
;�Na
_2.
Faii to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(i e! discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
;�No
'3.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
RNo
4.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
%J�No
26.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[X
Odor Issues
26.
Does rhe discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
y
❑ Yes
E3 No
liquid level of Iagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
kwo
�No
S.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
[:]Yes
roads. building structure, and/or public property)
_9.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
'0.
Were anv major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)❑
Yes}
No
1.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
�No
:3.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporar cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NC Dept of Agriculture
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd
Salisbury NC 28144
Dear NC Dept of Agriculture:
fflW'A
IT1 • •
OPEL
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
N.C. ? 3Lk'i', to
December 30, 1999 W14VM0NME,,'VT. HEAL -M
.*NATURAL RESOURC108
JAN 5 2000
KW 9F MYWMMTAE MAUNNEa
10WRILE isi6l11fldL 011e
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 80-1
Rowan County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
16I7 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
William E. Holman, Secretary
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28144
Dear Mr. Coltrain:
F1.1AA
'74��
NCDENR
NORTH CARDONA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAnFRAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 10, 1999
Subject: Animal Operation Site Inspection
Piedmont Res. Sta., Facility #: 80-1
Rowan County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection at your facility on September 9, 1999_
The facility was in good shape and the record keeping was satisfactory.
Please be reminded that the following items must be available for review during an inspection:
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas.
• Waste Application records, with accompanying waste analyses.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan, tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not necessarily total
acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis information. Must have three years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan which must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in.a Notice of Violation or
other enforcement actions. Also, remember that waste applications should be made during the time the
crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general, waste should be applied no earlier than 30 days
prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: File
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely, i ---
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

e ti, D Division of Soil andfWater Conservation UperaE><on�Review7t,�J
< i to gt!;
!:1 Division of Solil+and WaterrConservahon Compliance I& iiectibive 0 ,' 'tj
mf C L
p _ �, ' _
Wivisibn of Water Qu�alaty' 'Coance3lnspechon' i ail;'}�I µ �tt til"q1!t-i !p F ',i, u s+E + I r�1nc r c Ft
p.yl a -ice `' a fr A,ry all t J r�-+}!
Other Agency'- OperahonrRev�ew,x�*r ��r a .r: a t l �r�' Jtt�a'l.', int€ =tip y, i �ts�: ! !�!�{'R3t1•
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspectiotr 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ......[.11.�r .... ............. ..... .. ........... County: ............... ro.vVia-r1,.......................................
"\
Owner Name: .............................. Phone No:
Facility Contact: ...)?,Ay ..s.ael.... ....calre..t.yTitle: 6,Gl,kt.G.o. e—V. • Phone No: ............ ..Z.�Q Z:
Mailing Address: .... ..,.Q......... 5.�/t ef/.�.�1�......rh. 1t,Jt .....:�. .1.�., .. .>h..t'c`.1�............ G'........
Onsite Representative: .......... Ray. n©.L/ .4-c. Integrator: ...........................................
91� 1P
Certified Operator:....... (ti. .( q c ............. ' .�.' ! �. ..... Operator Certification Number:.,,2.04F.3 3 .........
cation of Farm:
...................................................................................................................... I ........................................................................................................................... ...... ...
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
atitude =• Longitude =• =' ="
" �F �tb Desi n Current ` ' ! Desi Current 'Destgn Current
�, Ca acgi PO ulation „ ,I°oaltry ..,E _rc.. Ca act t )€'Cat ti Capacity Po u"
Swine ty t .Po ulatton, tle lahan, t
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
❑ Layer iry a
II� ❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
!,. r
t ` Total Design Capacity
!
SSLW
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. ]f discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier; 00
Freeboard (inches): d��"."�'.`�'
........................... ........................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3123199
❑ Yes] No
[-]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes MNo
Structure 6
...............................
❑ Yes [XNo
Continued on back

Y ,
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
46'No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
hamediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
IR -No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
JENo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
[—]Yes
910
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
[:]Yes
JgNo
12, Crop type sdgLz b e-kn"., . � j 4 1 L�4 0--,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the C rtire/d Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
'j9 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
K -No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
ER -No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N0
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
,K] No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ;F No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ,ff No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes f5�No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes _No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes )B -No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes 5Wo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
P.
10 viola igris:off d foie -[cies viv rejnpte�1 i!><rririgphis:visit' Y;oo *..iii teeptiye,�o; fu>�thr: -
rorres• orideitce: a OU'f this :visit: - • - -
,. €':E:"tl', H :.0'. '''':'.is J 'I<':=: ";8aa r..°E.3,,:ii:t% .: �:lB:(t {t8 �;. •.•.i" 2u.. '!N'i 1°th@" d�@€fl t;' .-... �," §!€tfii3tE{3FiNn--E{Fd:: i 9 PE[§ta' '--.P{¢i[3E.$.o:EB'?E#}i iF E1,Ji,P:.::'. 3{ i.' @a"°'a E4E?-4H{{4SF:.tf{;�3:
Comments (refer to queskton #) ; E�iplain any,YFS answers and/or any recommendatio'ns
!or any;other'$eomments� ¢,I's1 (t;
ili3' .,.I '{ E 1 ? ':r- EPS ..,? is , r' ;P::{ s _ r.x:,°irfF. Y1.iff,F?f:.isai:'k.!!�: �3°"6Fiiiq�t� s. .(.._ 3 a,' 4 1.'P',`.i`
se;drawmgs of faciltty}to..betierNexpla�n srtua#►onsai�(use addtttonal�pages`as necessary) ,,: p5,,, ��tk`i
Pp-..•.�. f 1: -.... ,j- ,� .: �._. �A�. +@.-tir%.: j I, i.arti,"y._ e) Y :%f"P.:.SE!3�.r#r-,r f.'.:vRE sil.V! r« . Y : W.. ...�. 1 E..!- tl.�irE; r' �ii".� : �i �l- '.V p a N J t.. •'.:�.Y
i. - si� rfl'Reviewer/Inspector Name y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: rc� �j �vt a . v Date:
3/23/99
D3��r� 1�vhe :�5 v'�;
i. - si� rfl'Reviewer/Inspector Name y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: rc� �j �vt a . v Date:
3/23/99

r
facility Number: CY— Date of Inspection �7
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes OYINo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes [ Qo
roads, building structure, and/or public property) !!��
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes �*No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes MNO
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ;I�No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes o
tttotta omments
5
3/23/99

-01
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28144
'e
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 23, 1998
Subject: Site Inspection
Piedmont Res. Sta., Facility #: 80-1
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Coltrain:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
= _
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
fir..
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
=1
' . JAMES S. HUNTJR-
'CsOVER NOR
Waste applications
rL541�•�
s��
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28144
'e
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 23, 1998
Subject: Site Inspection
Piedmont Res. Sta., Facility #: 80-1
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Coltrain:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
= _
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
-:;
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
x:.,,, �.;,f;-=;.;S :•: -�-
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
ha
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
�„
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1696 POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops gown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen CNI Application fox f;.ommon Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (113) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardbrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid-February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs Nlac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximise crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should.be refrigerated if it is riot going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
pi6 ucer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
til Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Lincoln SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

1
ANN A 7-f9QG Michael Governor
rWilliam G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
>_ 71 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
February 14, 2001
Raymond Coltrain
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28144
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Certificate of Coverage AWC800001
Ag. Exp. Station, Facility #: 80-1
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Coltrain:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on February 13, 2001.
Based on his observations during the inspection the facility appeared to be well operated and maintain; and the
files were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
Q
NMM
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

4
M1 x j i r �Mr 12 wt k DIVlf
sioR`of Water
�; i rs o -d ict.°f"ti� raaO ihston of Sotl and Water Conservation, } t.5-'x(4�K- .r .� 1w S '/ .
��t� - �r-R � ... Z �*�� f•ic�' f. aio rx. H c;�r.n•.} ��r��til'arr :,qo�r� tf y. 'R-' � _ f F ,.. `•.r -'� -moi•.
] .r�r�Fx 4rair�r OtherAgency�,
r 'i,�-.��1ltY[`�a tS ;itr�t•-� ~r;� ��'Y ,;� 'iC, h C-) r:-.1.'}'�r�•'__'�' ^.i it 5',7� - `?
KF fid{ hic.J..iYs .r�r �. _ ter_. ..:s5..iur �1�-. .7.. ;ti f,� .>i• e...I � .ia s � r, „�.
Type of Visite-In
ompliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 9Zoutine O Complaint Q Follow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Datc or Visit: ' Time:
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
E] Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally CertIM d 0 Registered Date Last Operated
or Above Threshold: .......... . .............
Il G'�liC t
Farm Name: � 5 �..X... ...........:� Ir' r! L�• County:......:..1...............:5.:�.......................... ........... ............
OwnerName: ...................... .. .......t..."."../..:.0 .;( Phone No:.............................................................................
Facility Contact: ........................:......................................................Title Phone No: ....................................
MailingAddress:....... : .......... ..... 4'1 .............:..............................................................
OnsiteRepresentative ......... .+ia.G.t�.E2t r.7�-sut................o. ��t. �.1.�............... Integrator .........................................
Certified Operator:............/�C'-tfl.1. �.'.��...........L f�..�/...'..�.............. Operator Certification lumber:.... ZC`.. 1...�.. ......
L ion of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ,Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
+vu as
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
capacity Yopulanon
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer
[Dairy 157C
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 10Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps � ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
p
Discharges & Stream lrnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes JKLNo
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon El Spray Field F1 Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance inan-made" E] Yes E] No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State:' (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. ifdischanle is observed: what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (If vcs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes 4�lVo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes OQ No
01/01/01 Continued
❑ Non -Dairy
Number of Lagoons 10Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps � ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
p
Discharges & Stream lrnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes JKLNo
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon El Spray Field F1 Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance inan-made" E] Yes E] No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State:' (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. ifdischanle is observed: what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (If vcs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes 4�lVo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes OQ No
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: —
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes Q No
Structure I Struciurc 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: pie' ouJ
.... ............. -..................... ................................... ----•............................. ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 4// ........---- •----------------------------------
...................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes f r No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �Q No
❑ Yes []No
12.
Crop type / {jP e /- 5' L� S/ l.P r u ��
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
�LNo
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
RN o
I6.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Dd�Io
17 Xrerock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18 there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On-site F1 Off-site
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�-No
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
�-No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
ELNo
22.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
, -No
23.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
91 No
24.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
,JZ Na
25.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
4QNo
26.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
,O No
27.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes allo
Odor Issues
28.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
[fro
01/01/01
Continued

Facility Number: Onr_ Date of Inspection
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
3 i. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary- cover?
Printed on.
1/4/2001
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
( g Comments relfer to ueshan#)
. F_ { ' ❑ ~
c''comments answers na Pny�cxXomuiendationsorany otherpIaman
bUsedrawtngsoffactl�tytoetera lainsttuations(use4dditiola Field Copy Final Notes ' a
as necessa
u.
'WI
Reviewer/InspectorName
4r_\ �.0 ,✓Z�'L� L7+�1GS l y%
S
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Czh,�
P
Date:
'WI
Reviewer/InspectorName
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Czh,�
Date:
01/01/01

Facility Number --- Lagoon Number Lagoon identifier
O Active O Inactive Latitude Longitude E
By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS ❑ Map GPS file number:
35. Surface Area (acres):
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Water supply well within 250 ft of the lagoon?
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
39. Distance to WS or HOW (miles):
40. Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards?
43. Was groundwater encountered during construction?
44. Depth to Groundwater:
45. Spillway?
46. Adequate Marker?
47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure?
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
O less than 300 ft O 300 ft - 1000 ft O greater than 1000 ft
0 Yes O No
0<5 05-10 010
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes Q No O Unknown
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Unknown
Q Yes O No
O Yes O No
O Yes O No 1, -

,'"N
FORM IRR -2
Tract ,#
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
C
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
I r Field # j
1`
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN loading
7- ���� �r /c 51 (lblacre) _ (B) 3 do
111 (21 (31 (41 (51 fal (71 (81 (91 (10) fill
Date
mmlddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN
(lb/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(lblacre)
e ■ 191
1000
Nitrogen Balance 3
(lblacre)
(B) - (10)
Volume
# of Sprinklers
Start inns Total Operating Flow Rate Total Volume perAue
End Time Minutes (gallmin) (gallons) (gallacre)
(3)-(2) (B) " (5) ` (4) _V -L
(A
30
9:r)7
vsF
�a
3ia
v er,
o,
I, p217,
Y
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signatures '`i �,�.�-� Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No.
i NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

t10 A) - _W,
1+
FORM IRR -2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
C� Field #
C ci!-a-'%
Facility Number - 1 0
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Pian
Crop Type / Recommended PAN Loading
S/ all (n/a. {Macre) = iBi
111 121 191 141 f51 1131 171 fat (91 viol rill
Dale
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN
(lbllop() gan
PAN Applied
Oblacre)
(8) ■ (9)
1000
N*ogm Batanca =
(Iblacre)
(13)-(10)
titan 71fs1e Total 0 or Sprinklers
End Time Mules Operating Flow Rate
(gavmin)
(3)-(2)
Volume
Total Volume per Acre
(gallons} (gauacre)
(8) R (5) " (4) -EEL
(a
7-n-lif'
.1 e S 310
/0,91/5"b
/.
Crop Cycle Totals i
Owner's Signature'. aJ 4 Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No.
t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 833.
' Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR -2
A. I/.,-
g&V M 2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number I tip I - I C;
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type/j / Recommended PAN Loading
/f 1- ra i (lblaore) = iBj I 3O d
(it r71 rat lar r51 l6t (7) rat rot lint n n
Dale
truDate
Field # /� N
Waste Analysis PAN'
(1611000 gap
PAN
� p�Aapueied
(ib re)
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
(Iblacre)
(B) - (10)
of sprinklers Volume
Start Time Total Operating Flow Rate Total Volume per Acre
End Time Minutes (gallons) (gallacre)
(ga
(3)-(2) llmin)
(6) K (5) K (4) .-9L
(A
Facility Number I tip I - I C;
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type/j / Recommended PAN Loading
/f 1- ra i (lblaore) = iBj I 3O d
(it r71 rat lar r51 l6t (7) rat rot lint n n
Dale
truDate
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(1611000 gap
PAN
� p�Aapueied
(ib re)
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
(Iblacre)
(B) - (10)
of sprinklers Volume
Start Time Total Operating Flow Rate Total Volume per Acre
End Time Minutes (gallons) (gallacre)
(ga
(3)-(2) llmin)
(6) K (5) K (4) .-9L
(A
O,'DD 2:) D zr7 a / /!3 PS 700 /C? 'Z
j f Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature " �•- Operator's Signature
} Operators Certification No.
Certified Operator (Print} Oerato�,.-` �'� p
I NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 833.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each Irrigation event.

Foilowino is a list o[ the DE: -t -NR -Division of Wa:er Quality re_ional of ices atom with a m: p ]%ow4 ng the counties
under thejurisdic:ion of each regional of:;ce.
1�l• `L �y � �� I `` / v1
IN
it xgA.
V
LL, ll •'Y
1. Asheville Regional Office:
59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, NC 38801; 70,=-353-6303; FAX [phone]S
3. titi•inston-Salem Regional Office:
585 Waubhtown Sine:, Winston-Salem, NC 27107; 910-771—'600; F:=.:C 910-T171—'6-.1
Raleigh Regional Office:
3300 Bare:. Drive, Raleigh, NC 37609; 919-5714700; FAX 919-571--''713
4. Washington Regional Office:
1.14 Carohna Avenue, Washingion, NC =7539; 919-946-6»81; FAX 9 19-9 75-=716
5. Mooresville Regional Office:
919 North 41ain Street,,ylooresviile, NC 38115; 70:;-663-1699; FAN 70=-663-60,'0
6, Fayetteville Regional Off -ice:
Wachovia build ir , Suitt 7 14, Faveneviile. NC 33:01; 910—=S6 -15- 910-S6-07,07
7. Wilmington Regional Office:
127 Cardinal. Wiirninaton, NC 23- OS -:S-5; 91 910-]50-=00u

Anittfa.l `Paste Nlanagement Pian Cei ,,Iication
(Pleasd tvice or ohnt all in(orm;7(iom that dors not ,ejuire n si,2natur,!)
Existingor Ne�ti' or, ".Expanded ( lease circle ane)
generalnforrnation:
NEme of Farm:–Facili[v N0:
Owrier(5) N=,,e: _ ®.� ! Q. Phone No.%V -;779—iZ�
T
NfaiiinQ AdLr2ss: 63-51c10 %4
`"farm Locrrio1'.: Cour[`: i aril is loca[_'? iri:
La[i[udz and L�avilude:°�/°7 d �� Inte�a:a�or.
P!ease au c h a cosy of a county road wich [oc_[ cin iden[ified and desLric'e below (Be road
names. dire_.io,is. n I enost. e:c.):
Ooeration Descriotion: _
Type of Swire Xo. of'.Aribnais T.-ve No. or Ai!brc:s T voe_o/r C.mle NO. r ri,nc!s
J Wean to . e ler T 1:: C: �A lair. /,5'6 _
=1 ...der to Finish
...! Farrow to Vv'ea n
aj7OW to .....'!e-. _
ear ow to ; inish Ori;er T.,, -Pe of Number of .znbn,:is:
:1 Gilts
:2 3 o ars
.. . . .. .
... ...... ..
Pre:7biis Des:'.. ,-iudr69r,ei Desivn C::orca - T'arrtl D�ar7r C. �acrr:: `
Acreaae Ava;iabie for Application:_ �CJ , C) Require•! .acreage: Z� , d
ti'umber of La;ocns 1 Stomse Ponds : Total Capacit; : A A L6 Cubit =ee: (ft)
A:t subsur:ace di ma=ins present on the iar:t: Y -E5 or 0 (please circle one)
U YES: are subsurface drains present in the area oC e LAG 00,N' or SPR.aY FIELD (please circle one)
......,....x --------- --,,.._---------------
ONvner / `[ana,er .-agreement
I Ove) verify that all the- above information is corzc: attd %vill be updnied ucon c :angin.=. I (v --e, understand ;he oceratitn
and maint.aanc= procedures established in the approved animal waste manae_:neat plan Cor lite taut named above and will
impidment these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to tie zxistinQ design cao3Lity of the- waste treatment and
storax: systertt or construction of new facilities twill require a new ce:titicauun to be submitted to the Division oC
Z_nvironme:ttai N[anag_:r.ent before the nets animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be- no discnarze od
xtimal waste from the storage or aepiicatian sysf.m to swtac_ waters of the- ;raiz directly throuP a man-made
convdvance or from a stor;n even[ less severe than the 25 -year. 214 -hour storm and the.-. must not be run-off from t.e
application oc vimal waste. I (we) uncle stand that run-off of pollutants Crom lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimiz.d using t.cbnical standards deveioced by La- ! Natural Resources Conse: -ation 5{ ice. The approved pian will be
Hied at the farm and at the office of rye local Soii and Water Conservation District. I (-d) know that any modification
must be acproved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conser:•ation Disar c: prior zo
imoiementabon. A cbange in land ownership requires written notification w DELI or a new certification (if one approved
plan is chanced) within 60 days of a atlr sr.el
ame of Land Owner
S'sgnaturIr.
:
`lame oanaeer ' d'
5i,nature:
Date:' —2X • '�

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a tecitnicat specialist designated by the Norrlt Carolina Soil anti Wale: Consen•ation COMMissiOn pursuant to !-;A
NCAC br .000f. I c-rtifv that the animal waste manacement 5%,stem for the farm named abo%-e has an animal %vastz
management plan -that mees or exceeds standards and spec :ticatiuns oC Lhd Division of i=nvironntental `tanageMent
(DEMO as spec:tied in 15.E NCAC 2?d.O2! and the USDA -Natural Resources Conser;atiun S,:--ict' (MRCS) and/('r the
North Carolina Soil and Wate, Cunser-;ation Commission pursuant to 15.a NC_-�C "t_p21t 1 and IfA NCAC nE .CCOt-
.0005. The lollowina e!e:nen s are included in the plan as appkabie. Whiie tach catecorr designates a technical spuc:mist
.vho may sign each ce:ti[tcatiun (SD. SL INTr7, RC. I). the tec Mical specialist should only certiC..- psts for:vhich he.r are
tet tntcal!v comae:eat.
H. Cerri,J"icatioiz of design
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Svctem
C?en :he IIDDrODriare bo.L
>✓.eistina faciiity without re:rosit (SD or W' P)
Storage volume is adtquate for oreradon capacir'::
rL:uu,rz:Md.^.ts.
Stura2e c:toanikt': ccxtsiac ti'itls :Fast. utiiization
N`e:v. ernanded or retrofitted faciliiv (SD)
animal waste storage and treatment structures. suet as but not limited to coltc, :bun systems. lal*oon; and pom:s,
have beet designed to me_t or exceed the minimum smnLau s and spe_iticatiun5.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
I at:on C, S G Date Work Cornpiet2d:
a:wss
(I n /) 1, V C PhCne No.' 0 - -/ 0rl
2
B) Land Application Site (WUT)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffo -s): adequate amount oC land for '•va;te u6iizacion; caosei crop is
sui;.able for waste management: hvdmulic and nutrient loading rates.
/c
Name of T hnical Specialist (Ple�u Print): _ � rte L:os4r-- _
�fiLiatiori LA-"c"ti S L,• C- — _ Date Wor"l- Completed:
.�,ud? Dl C P`10nc No.:-7—eq-62%441'
Si_,'IaIU, e: Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check rhe anpranriare box
Facility %vithout exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility docs not cont:un anv exterior lots.
�Laciiity with exterior lots (RC)
McLhods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and ?leave use areas have been designed in
accordance with tecbnicai standards developed by NRCS.
Name of T
4Z ill, [i0 r1
cal Specialist (Please Print):
SiL!1;iU1i�'�1
-\WC -- August 1. 1997
Dat: 'W or l C'oimp[z:es:
Phone No.: 21 (3z /� 0 JY'
Date:

D,).,Apolication and HandnnR Eauinment
CiieC the aj-.orOoriGle box
i<<•� 19 ftr t`;t�;inLllRa fy with e.'! zmg :it~�iicatinn egs�ir~ment (W*L:p Or 1)
�,zi • _i waste aapiicadun equipment in the plan has been etcher ticid caiibraWd or e•:aluatrd
accordance with exis6ri� design than and tables and is able to apply waste as necessar: to accommodate L
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at mi -,s not to
exC'eY either the scec:fied hvdmulic Or 'IUUit:1L loading rates. a schedulC :or Limine or apciicadons has bet.,
established: requi ed buffers can bC maintained and caiibratign and udju5�-nent Guidance are c.,.ntainea as part of
L`Le -�ianj.
J New --,nndea. fir exi;ting faellir:' without"I=ilnQ n'nrte 1r)r1knti(1r1 fC•F z7r-v irlgntion. (l)
Ani :.:a :vas -t aopiication equipment specified in tett pian has be2n desi_zz i to acpiv Waste as n�cessarV to
accctntnodafe the :vast-, rnana2emenf plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the ares required by L`
plan at raies not to exceed -,alter the spCc:tiCd hvr~raulic or nutrient lcading -aLes: a _chedule Cor timing or
apPiic."tions has bean es;ablisned: re'.`uired buffers can be maintained: c2iibr',160a and adJuscrTirnt. ?'S1.1rarL'e are
contained as oan of the plan).
,.� Vie-.:'_-'xrmnnded._ nr Ciciiit:' witltoui ?Xi_gunq RisEe 1rnlicntinn e_uir mie^.t 6)r inn.d ;rrc:idinq nor usim,
,rra: irk gntii}n. OVLP or Ii
�nun::i waste application equipment speciCwd in the plan has been selected to appl.: waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management pian: (proposed appiicauon equipment can cover the area required by Lhe
plan at races not Lo exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a scheduiC t*Qr Limina ot
apoiicarions bas been established: reouired buffers can be maintained: caiibndun anti adiusLmcnL _uidance are
contained as part of Lhe plan).
Name of T ,inicaI Specialist (Please Print): + -t CQa _
Ai'filiatlon c,. C.)Gn Date Wort Completed:
-C d k. C Phone No.: %d`�-_1v37 f60�i
Sic-rlatur,:
2�l/ /(Date: 3 -Zj?-- Z` g�
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. .v[ortality yta_na!Zement and_Emer�encv Acrion Plan (SD
SI. «VUR RC or Ii
The management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Cuntrol ChecllisL. an lnse_:
Control Cliec!JisL_ a NlOnaiiLv ManaUemCnt Checklist and an L:nerge:icv Ac:fun Plan. Sources of both odors and
insets have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Practices to Minimize Odors and 3CSL
Manaa,2:nent Practices to Control lnsec:s have been selected and included in Lhe waste manaiCmem plan. Both Lhe
:`loraiir: `(anaseatCn[ Plan and the atC:ceac, tion !an are comuiete and can be imeiemented by this faciiiL..
-Name of T� i�nical Specialist (Pt.e IS, Prir:t):
AffiliL,tit;n S Date Wor:l- Ctamnlete is
Address
SiL,narwre: �& A
Phone No.: 71 -07-40y
Date: -7—ZL, q �'_
F) Written `otice of .New or E.r•aandin_* SNvine Farm
The folloving signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine forms that begin construction after June
'_I. 1996. U the facility was built before June 21. 1996. when ',.vas it constructed or lust
expanded
I (we) certify unci l (we) have aaernoted to contact by ce.afitd mail all adjoining property o:,-ne.-s and all propeny owners
W120 ou-t proctr:ti' located across a public road. street cc highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The nonce was
in compliances yith the requiremenLs of'N`CGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property Owners notified is
attaciiC:i. / A
`ame of Land Owner:
Signature:
-Name of ti[ana,,Ter (if ;tiff -~zit :tom owne,)'
Si --nature:
AWC - Au, -,,-,SE 1. 199 -
Date:
Date:

r
III: Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
-New. e:cnanded c;r reirot tied facility (SI)
?animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lo2oons and ponds. have begin installed
in accordance :with the approved pian to :flee: or 4:�ceed the minimum standards anti specifications.
For eXisting fttcuities Without retrofits, no certiftcativn is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (P,e•'se Print):
iauon_
J lv.T'itlCl:re:
B) Land Anolicadon Site (WUP)
Oieck the approprinie box
Date Work Comale:e
P`lone No.:
Date_
The Cropoine system is in place on all land as spe::ii"ied in the animal waste management plan.
_.' Conditional :approval: ail required land as specified in the plan is cleared rur planting: the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not bean established and the owner has committed to establish the
ve2t!iation as specified in the plan by (Mon thldavi-ear): the proposed cove. crop is
acpropriate for comoiiance w•idt the w•astzstiiization plan.
Name of T
.`,fiiliation
address
Signa:Ure
_1 :klso check this box if am)roDriate
if the CrOppin° system as snecif ed in di-- plan can not be established on newts c'.eared !and within -0 days
of this certification. the owner has comm, iuep to establish an interim crop for erosion control:
nical Specialist (Please Print):
0
Comole.zd:
Phone No.: 7ny432 _ ey
Data• � /z� _ l�
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in STS. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that [ (we) have committed to esmbiislt the cropping system as specified in my (our) write utilization plan.
and if aonrooriate to esabiish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit w DEM a ve:iFicat'tun of comotetion
from a Technicai Specialist within 1= cniendar days foliowina the date specified in the conditional certification. [ (we)
realize chat failure to submit Ibis vc ification is a violation of tfie %,.,=e management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
",'a -me of Land Owner:
Signature:
-Name of N-lanager (if different from ovvoer):
Signature:
August 1. 1997 1
Date:
Date:

CTRunnff Cnntrols from Exterior bots (RC)
Fac:11111 P.'IM ex[oFlor loos
�IC�lud.i to minimizt die run off U[ pollutants from lounging arld he-jv use ween inSL-llI ,• as SCC�1fIC
lif '7� ?tan.
For fac:iiries without exterior lots; no certiRca?Ton is necessar':.
Name of Tec.wnical Specialist (Ples_1=
e P ir,t):�_ 1�� cfz-
-\iti?lali
Address (.=_?e�:c;:;: 7-C
S1E 1 ICu:�' �:—.
Date WorA ComLIC�t��.
f Prone No.:
D) ADolicntion and HandlinZ EQUJDment Installation (WUP or I)
(w fl L•�.t iJ:� Drlate .7iDC:i
nialal ��'aste acpiication and har.dlin? equinnient :;.e:;;ied in t1he ,inn is Q. site and read.: for u e:
:iibratiun and adjusme.,lt ma[cnais nave been provided to t'ie o: vers ar,d are cor :intd :'s L:u; of die alar..
-rl atraai %vaste acpiicanon and liaildlin,2 _auionien[ :las not �Lz!a iniailc-1 bUL L' e OtVnur
has proeused leasin, or third par.: applica[ion and has provided a sisne:i contrnc:: equipment saccifled in
L.e contract. a°r.,.s 'x'idl the requirements OC the plan: rejuired bufS4rs Can be niainlaincd. calibMLion and
adjustment guidance (lave been provided to the ox'ners and ate contained as pari of the clan.
J Conditional approval: .triimal waste aoplicatiun and fiand!ina euuiemenl specified in die plan has
ae_ l ourcb;sed and will be on site and insiailed bytmonihr'da,/veasi: parr: is adcauate
siorae_ to ]oid the `x'ast_ uncal rhe eauiomenL is insiaile'd and undi :he wasi_ can be :and applied in
accordance with the c.00pinQ system contained in the plan. and calibmrdon and adjustnient Ruidance have
been provided to the owners and are con ,ie I as part of the :Ian.
Fame of T nical Specialist (P!ease Print):
�G Date `� ork Completed:
S?.—mitre:
Phone
:Z �ly6 Dac'a:
The following si_n3ture block- is only to be used when the box for conditional aparovaI in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) C-_ ::.^.' '-.'-at t (we` have committed to .ourc^ase the animal w;sze a::ohcadon and tiandlino e',1ui0nle-[ as
specified in rnv (our) wasi-2 manasement plan and kvill submit to DCVI a veritic:ldon of de!ivery and installation
rpm a Tec tical SDeci'wlist within 1f calendar days follo%vins-, the date sce,_itied in the conditional ce:uricabon. i
(we) realize t%ai iailuCq to submit IhJS vl.-4flcabon is aviolation of Lhe waste rna:mzy:ment Dian arld vvlll sublet; me
(Ls) ill 1k- e i�C: emL' tC aC iC?n Tom Dt`t.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
tiame of Manager (ii different t;orri ow-iier):
Signature
Date:
Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality 1•1an2,ennerit (SD. Si. WUR RC or 1)
McLhcds to control edcra and insects as sceeitied in u`le Plan havd been installer! and are ccera iorl al. Tne
mortality rnq_,naae:nent s•.szem as specified in the Pl-, has so been insia.iled and is ooeradonas.
`ame of T hnacal Specialist (Pierse C4
�fiiiiatior: „�c��. �[,Je��] Date ��LrK Completed:
;dd[-ess
SlQnaturC7
AWC -- Auqust I. 199
�I-ion.- xo.: 2f- Oaf
Dat -2

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the foilovving address.
Deparimernt of Environment. Health. and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section. Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Ralei,,h. �C 3766-0-53-5
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete animal ti ante
Nlanaaement Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in Your fifes with your animal Waste Manazement Plan.
.- WC -- Au,ust 1. 199 n

EMER(J"FLNC,iT M��1 ON P A N
PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY ( DWO }
704 - 663 - 1699
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES (ENS)
704 - 638 - 01911
ROWAN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
( SWCD )
704 - 4'37 - 07133
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE ( NRCS )
704 - 637 - 1604
ROWAN COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE ( CES )
704- 633 -0571
This plan will be implemented in the event that waste from your operation is
leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until waste
reaches surface waters of leave your property to consider that you have a
problem. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen.
This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The followring are some action items you should take.

1. Stop the release of waste. Depending on the situation, tris may or may
not be possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are
listed below.
A. Lagoon ! Waste Storage Pond overflow - possible solutions are:
a. Make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon / waste
storage pond.
b. Stop all flows into the lagoon 1 waste storage pond
immediately.
C. Pump waste to fields at an acceptable raze.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
C. Add temporary soil berm to increase elevation of dam.
B. Runoff from waste application field - actions include:
a. Immediate]), stop waste application.
b. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
C. Create a temporary diversion to contain the runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the
runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff
occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers - action include.-
a.
nclude:
a. Stop the irrigation pump.
b. Stop the recycle pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharze.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

D. Leakage from flesh systems, houses, solid separators - action
include:
a, Stop the irrigation pump.
b. Stop the recycle pump.
C, Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush system, or solid
separators_
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon / waste storage pond.
Often this is seepage as opposed to flouring leaks - possible
action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to
catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump
back to lagoon / waste storage pond.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove
animals and fill holes and compact urith a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side
walls and lagoon / waste stornae pond bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
A. Did the runoff reach any surface waters?
B. Approximately hour much was released and for what duration'?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or
property damage?
D. Did the spill leave the property?
E. Does the spill have the potential to reach any surface waters?
F. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach any surface
waters?
G. Are potable water wells in danger ( either on or off of the
property) ?
H. How much reached surface waters?

3. Contact appropriate agencies.
A. During, normal business hours, call your Division of Water
Quality regional office: Phone 704 - 663 - 1699. After hours,
emergency number: 919- 733 - 3942. Your phone call should
include: your name, facility name, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above. the exact location of the
facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have
been taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
B. if the spill leaves your property or enters surface waters, call the
local EMS phone number 704 - 638 - 0911.
C. Instruct EMS to contact the local Health Department.
D. Contact the Rowan SWCD at 704 - 637 - 078:1, the
NRCS at 704 - 637 - 1604, or the CES at 704 - 633 - 0571
for advice / technical assistance.
4. If none of the above numbers work, call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask that person to
contact the proper agencies for you.
Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of the problem to
minimize ofd'- site damage.
A. L. P. Barger Jr. Grading 704 - 633 - 8693
B. Parks Hubbard Grading 704 - 278 - 4876
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the la;oon / waste storage
pond { NRCS, SWCD, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
Name:
Phone:
7. huplement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste
management plan to keep problems with release of waste from
happening again.

ATTACHMENT A
Page i
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN[
Producer County �c�,tg„ —
Address �O '� Kind of operation kjow
Type of Waste Facility.
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capaciy . When the waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should he used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic _yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertiLzer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crap to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are 'important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potental. Waste shall not be applied cc
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply wase on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff _o
surface waters. Wind conditions should also he considered to
avoid :rift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based.on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements gay be more or less based on the waste analyses
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on to
following:
Amount of 'Waste ?roduced Per Year:
� � �yX3�5 u�r 7 �5ao
animals x�� gasre /animal/yr total waste
produced.

?age ?
Amount Qf Ni.troaen produced Per Year:
animals x lbs N/animal/yr = total N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste is
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for days of
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped every
months.
The following acreage for waste application will be needed
based on the crop to be grown and surface application:
Field SoiL Crop Re&Li*tic Lbt. 4 Acres Lbs. M Month of
Type Yield Per Ac. utilized Applicarion
TOTAL I ' I
Anl6utt of M f i c i t d l_ ._ _� I
surpLus or Deficit
Narrative of Operation
Call the soil and Water Conservation District office after you
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying
waste.
Prepared :y " r tic
ame _ Title Date
Concurred in by
Producer Date
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)

PRODUCERS NAME Piedmont Research Station
TRACT FIELD
SOIL TYPE
CROP
REALISTIC YIELD
Lbs.N per Ac. ACRES
Lbs. N Utilized
1610 D4
Hiwassee
Fescue 1 Pasture
5 Tons 1 ac.
250
1.1
206
D6A
Hiwassee
Fescue / Pasture
5 Tons / ac.
250
6.0
1,125
D613
Hiwassee
Alfalfa
6 Tons / ac.
120
8.0
960
D6C
Hiwassee
Small Grain
8 Tons I ac.
130
9.0
1,170
D6C
Hiwassee
Lespedeza
4 Tons / ac.
80
9.0
720
D7
Dogue
Bermuda Pasture
6 Tons lac.
300
1.9
428
D7
Dogue
Rye / Pasture
6 Tons / ac.
300
1.9
428
D8
Hiwassee
Corn Silage
20 Tons / ac.
240
12.0
2,880
D8
Hiwassee
Small Grain
8 Tons / ac.
130
12.0
1,560
D8
Hiwassee
Soy Beans
40 bu. / ac.
160
12.0
1,920
D10
Riverview
Corn Silage
20 Tons / ac.
240
21.8
5,232
D11
Dogue
Bermuda Pasture
6 Tons lac.
300
14.2
3,195
D11
Dogue
Rye I Pasture
6 Tons / ac.
300
14.2
3,195
D1 2A
Hiwassee
Rye / Pasture
6 Tons / ac.
300
8.0
1,800
D12B
Hiwassee
Matua / Pasture
5 Tons / ac.
250
8.0
2,000
All of the soild waste
is sold to a third party ( see Third Party Agreement form)
TOTAL
90
26,818
and removed from the farm.
Amount of N produced
2,916 lbs, of N
Deficit of N
23,902 lbs. of N
* Based on Waste Analysis Report with
N at 2.4 lbs. per 1,000
gallons irrigated
On fields where corn silage is planted apply 240 lbs. of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where small grain is planted apply 130 lbs. of N 1 ac., no more than 30 days b6fore planting.
On fields where rye is planted apply 300 lbs. of N / ac, no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where soybeans is planted apply 160 lbs. of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where fescue is grown apply 250 lbs. of N / ac. if field is used for hay and 110 lbs. of N / ac, if is used for pasture.
On fields where bermuda is grown apply 300 lbs. of N / ac.., no more than 30 days before planting:
On fields where matua grass is grown apply 250 lbs, of N 1 ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where alfalfa is grown apply 120 lbs. of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where lespedeza is grown 80 lbs. of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
Waste applications should be made in the following months for each crop.
Corn
- March - July
Small Grain
-September - November
Soybeans
- April - June
Fescue
-March - June 1 August - November
Bermuda
-April - October
Matua
- April - October

•Stat
kO rnOn
J
Piedt Res"'C11 ion
Frd of
ad-19350 Sherrillsoa 29147
Salisbury, NorthCan
s,29 C35
C18 z.
til Y.6 1
Is To
0
Is
,ilpf
14.2
13.4
2C
ID 0 T-1 yf
qz
4.6
. ........

C. • Y f � ' lit f h �i;r' rA- f � �.•..•i'a j.� t' rl�" �,.'.
VIA;
���� � tt•-',j4�,'S'•"L��;',q;.�'��.�p�`�;5 [ .'l�ryf,�• .� :y�' I� ! j''i � Tly�1 � 4,x:^
a'4. T ty s .i.. [��,'vstl'C t ,iw ` .' "`# i,.,r f J_
�. � s
"�' �J -s r4 . � • Is• s� ! �a; •Ah< r3> `� :. ,+ � s '�S'.�3{ .r �:� s' 1��+�'p��
a ����SS :1 '� r � l � {��„ t �'► f ` w�.`�'�jSil i I�
elI
- tit �.` .*` , +.:�i �y {-trr'.;;ry`f,,�,rr�f�#: ,ys
iy y
•r, // �� 'rsi.xi,w y r 3'�fAyr it 1*r '7{�J'ti
if
rel -y
� J'��'i � .� _ ,'t, • , 3 �t ..l � f r �. A
{ [. r 1. V •.,' hti. I , t` h 7 yy
l � �' �f,� tit ���, �PviL•� s+ { e / '7 � �� ► r\ ��`~ S�� S��' i • i s��t � ' "�
s • r SS" r .• ,r '• C : e i Ir \ f r,�;_ y:.
1'44 litL'. t`•'.. ;Y .;• _.f�a;?�I; vti;'` r�i';a����(
�' I •iii r: -' - r :-•�.•.&i' e � �,� s , ,a r��s� '
�'�'�� .1 .� -I�it �, r�#a •: y,:4'xj.+ •' Alt z�s�'4'•r►-.,h '�
I
�'
C3{�� - 717 r/rJl 1P �`.��rtiLr�
} J ( r Vj '1 } Y,r {)' ;{hif •.\ `
Lir •%•).
i't �" 1 �.►a 7 :' � r/p.r S ' i trw i 7J1
L *,, N", ♦ ,r 4, � qs 1
66yr I��.
yfoi
+yet
- h3 "� 1 \ � � � �•.. �� �; ' Aft
,,s. ; � � : fr•"',t • . r 11 ,fir �� `,
r 4.
rr Tia
Aft
ti �I"xs w,, rY � i,«• --i
sjk �L �t ♦y t ::,_i7, r, e_,.r`� rf„ t: .,..
--

Comconer.:s or an ?Anima€ Was---
C.
as::
C. V, �,s:e appiicaiion —ne:Loa
D. DorninM Solt series y : � r _:e:: S :%ar ,\ ii l S` Us r a i � r
..s �. Eel u eY c tv;�t„ a p�lc...tic
E. Crops :o be g,o%v-n by field
x ;2iis:ic Seto _ c :dons (ti.'--EjoI M crops i0 be grott% wriere data is
ayallable
C. Mvroa= apr,iicaiion not by Aid 5ased on ATE. or recommendations frOM a
land ?rant universiry NR.Y.E. data is not avaiiable..-_:50, a
=c uais \ i`Y M ,Z — - -el
�. + appi. ::..r:�._ R. _ ._.
H- "Vaste appiickon windows based on W -7 -en t '- reCe:`'. C C.CpS _rp ac;.."e'
?rOtVl rt t,Va<_ie ippiicadons s:nGL'!i ce Suc: wafle 5:WgI :S ac:
any time duninC We _y e=
T NRCS i::Qa.ion parame.ers
R-2c-ileQ SiZc:yc'i'_OrS from N CC �Z'aste Utilization Pian Standard 033.
K. Caiibration inic Harlon
L. Waste sampling for nutrient analysis `Within 60 days of land anpiicstior,
M. Annual soil samplitagg
I. Lime requiremenr
_. Measure -near of Copper accumulation
-. Measurement of Zinc accumulation
V1. Record Keeping:
Recuired - & order to sabsr We Div`,Eion o: LVa-er QL'a.it+' s .Cr`n
proctrures. e iOilowinc items need zo be a'+a da ie at An int;itR; 3i fig:—
i. Waste appiication records
i '1 7 � i� l 1 t t I p'� C "�: C'l 1 P i s ;1 o •� C a
�l,p of �a +:. ds nc_ud�__ i:. t o;: f.� d rid ac:_
_. Ce.rilled Write Ma.nagernen: P! --n (i: apClic: ie) v
rV251e sa'mwe a.:,._. +SiS OC C._.C.......t.00: or '.Vc:_i„ COnst::L..::ts
B. Recommended - lr rnav be 'beneficial for you to nointain the addidona_
oilo%,ling records for ve,^;Iic�ticn of Best �1azag=en: P'acrice5 (��l �sj:
1 . Daiiy Ic�'....;:i rain records
?. � ee.�-Iv lagoon leve'. (ire_poarc) :Acores
_. Soiis anaiysis
-�. �I irnal popu'iatlon
]. Cron yNds
v 1+. Eme-?e^c•; Ac—or pla.r, si-,ouid inciude provisions ior:
.-''-. Oesc:Iptlon on how to soup the =03se of We '.t'2sz::
E. ne"cnpiion on inoty :o assess zhe e ;; n: o: the spill mod now any 01cno'us
C:=2es.
C. :::one numbers for Contac: at ar,,-propnaie agencies
VIII. Odor Control
A. Chec!;-isz of potential odor sources
B. Site-speOiic management practices to tninimize, odor sources

General Guidei., es for Dairies
i, All solids froirn paved areas :::i_:sc be cdllec:e^ in a 'w rice szwnge :aL:ln .
SuAce runoff :rom paged are -is imus: be ;: nimized by the use of pr ac:ices
such as guccers. pools. and ciiversion ditches.
All liquids from paved and .:tirog areas nausc be cellec:e�f in ;l . 'asze
scorage faciii y or, in some ocher "uy created to !:':slue only a__ ........ iL'c
CISC F iY,ae of poiluc a:::5 in a szorm event less severe than ye.ar. 21
hour storm cvenc. For anyC3c'_iiC` wis'ning, to inslaii a sys-' oc':er E. --con a
wa5:e storage faciiic`:', a reG'ues: niusL be maO for a site specific
demr:PhnaLion in accordance "Ah the criteria esmblA e'd in AF. of the
THIRD Guidance Merno dated AugusL 9, 1995.
J. AP dry sL_4cks mu5L include e'.t'ncr t. roof ant be able :a re:ain ,.t: !ic'.:!Qs: Cr
all lioui—�s .-iusc be hanclet li e chose from ::+vet a. e's as
dmchbed in Arn 2 above. V
a i rdoL Aker scrip mus: be estabtsherce:;ee .cunIng was
4:::,. a_
:Vpically void or vegeta:lon dukn' the «'dicer monc_Zs alit an,.: pere2=iai
screams. ponds. and ways, ays, 1he facer sL='C :%"`:s: ce roue a
fend'. `'here a 100400cMer schp cannoc be :'sca!!2_. t :4'�__.urs•
seaHn, basir:s. or oder coz.se: -4r:or: prac:ices mus: to uset.
Y :liter szhp or at least 73 feel MLLS: be esLabhin et ben e_: heay., rr4: r:L
areas wkh sparse vegetation_ ala; drainage ways. 7ihe C:.ter s,rip :�.us: 're
prdteczed by a pence.
C. Perennial SLreait5 Sur:oui det by a food p is�ur 4 _ stand of 4 e rnus: ce
by a fence wren LLie screams are in pas Lures t_'a: are in diose prox.m.-ir`% to
it. Cairy operations or :`'heli the livestock tvpicallv cross ti = screa: .-:Orn
cAe pamure to get to the barn:. ErodeV or barren swearn ..arks Cue to
animal traffic are evidence zha: anirnal exclusion is needed.
r. Where stream buffers are incend'ed for runoff pollucanc r:!cering'.
measures to minimize channe!ization and promote sheer ftw r:4r sL be
installed ant m�aincaineci.
S. Stream crossiri;s must be instailed where needed.
9. trails must be :r scailed as needed.
10. , p roperiv Cehgnet ant impiennen:e! Waste L oh:a:ion Plan :'lust be
G�`:'e.ope^ and. impie-n?enced.

Sir I[ rcc
I':11111sIU1fi
1'avetl lull ur 11:11 n tile}'
Sill I..Icv
Ilttltletl al Cas
Alannlc tlr)' stacks
SlulagC laid( or baslll
sullacc
Daily Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
(,, acid'
BAH's it) hlllliE ize Otlor -- � Si(C SlIcclllc Practices `
• u1):6l)' lnutlllctlull
Cl
Vegellllive or wooded btlllei s
Cl
Rccul1 mellllell bcsl Inalulgel11c111 pl1 lcliccs
n
(;mId 1111Igilic'11t alltl Cullullurl sense
• Wel III:IIIIIIC-COVCILAI slill(lcl'S
n
SClaileul flush Marl)' — -- �_------
'
n
holrlule al'ying will) t)lopul' VClltilatillll
Cl
Rutitine checks :111d rll,ihilC11mut: on walcicis.
hylli:1111s. pities, stuck liillks
• ii llle
Cl
- I'lUnit)iC (h)'lllg lvllh l Ilul1L'1 vClilli.11ll111
• 1'alli:ll Iniclobial llccurlllulsitiull
Replace %vcl or nlanulc-Cuvcicll lccicling
• I':Iltl:ll llllclublal ductimpuslllull
l'Iovide fllillltitllalllage 161.S101C111 allule -----� --
• Pallial I111clublal decompusiilun
r.l
1101/1111 ill' mill -level loathing
• Hisill, while lining ;
Cl
rank cuvels
• Agllallun when Cll plyiilg
n
Bashi sin face In:ll.S uf'sulitls;
n
nlillinlize lilt 11111olr:111t1 liquid atlililiulis
Cl
Agilnic mill pi iur to In:Ilime icnluv:il
Cl
Pitwcll biological :ltlllltivcs ill o\idmils
SCll11iIL FIII -III laces •�I';IIIkli III icIullial (ImolIIIlositiUn Cl l,itluitl (llainagc liunl sclllctl solids -- --
• N- iein�" while filling n Remove solids Icg111a11)•
• Agitaliun whell cilllltying
Manuic, slurry ui sludge Agil:tlion ivied sillealliag
slncncicr ootids 0 Vokililc gas clllissiuns
Uneuvelcll rllanulc, volalilt: gas emissions while
511111)' ol'sloclgc ull litlil t113-ing
stl I lacus
Pl11sl 1:1rlhs
Agilslliorl urlecyclell lapnolr
liquid while O,anks tic filling
Uutside tllilht collection Agilalion c1111hi ; n;ISICIvaIcl
urjunclion buxcs cunvcyallce
AMOC - Novcnlbcr 11, 1996, [ agc I
C1 Suit injcctioll of' slulIylslutlgcs
El Wash ICsidllal nlamnc Il um sill Catler aper Ilse
O I'Iumi biological adds ives ur o.xitlanls
Cl SuiI injection ofslulIy/sludges
n Soil inculllulaliun within'18Ills
F.1 Spleatl ill Olin 11161'uinl la)•crs I'm lal)itl thying
n PIovcn biological allclilives or oxidants
Cl Flush lank cuveis;
❑ lixlentl fill lines lu ncar bullum of tanks wish
71111i-silllull vcnls
C1 ]lux covels

Sotrrce
C,a115C
11MI's (11 nlillinliLC t.ltlof Site S IC'Cllic I I:lctices
7 -ii s1:1111111S
Agilatitm dill ing mil1111 tallk
n
Sully ImIk Covel s
lilling amt (Immlown
I:nd ufdlainpillcS al
Agit•Itiurl doling waslewaler
❑
I:xlclld dischalge Iruillt ofllillcs nndclncalL
L•Igoorl
convcyancc
laguoll litlnid level
1,;1gooll snl laces
+ volatllu g:ls CIII15511III:
❑
I'lopet. lagoolt liquid call;lelly; ----
• Iliolllgic:ll 116.611„
Cl
Collect lagoon 51,11(up plocel ums;
• Agilaliull
n
Millilmlol sillfacc :II C:1-lo-vollilne iatill' .
til il'atiun sill inklcr
nuzzles
I)catl ;I Fe
Cl Nlillimmil agilaliun when pumping;
CI Mccll:nlical aclatioll;
Cl I'lovCll hiukll;ic:Il adtlilivcs
• iliwll p1mule agitatioll., Cl 111igale on thy days willi little or no wind;
• 1Vind til ill n Nlinintum ICcunllncnded opmatiug III ocedulc;
C3 1'1111111 intake near lagoon liquid sill kne;
Cl 1'onlll linin second -stage 1:lgooll;
Cl 1 ilsh lcsidllal mallule Flom tulles at end of
still ly/sludge 1lullipings
• C;: icuss decomposition C1 111opel. dispu5iliull of calcasses
Slauding w:llcl alvund lnllnullcr dlaillnl;c; Cl (iladc :nld landscape Such Illat walel(hills —
Ihcililics N'titail11i:1I ticculnllosilioll o(. away lionl 1,36litics
organic 1naticr
N -Ind 11aciced unto poltlic foully nrlilltaioed access Io:uls n Falnl access load nlaintenarlec
loads 1,10111 falls access
Additiunal Infumialion :
Cattle N•lanure rvlamlgemenl ; URO I(olcll]Ml' P;ickel
Daily liducaliunal Unit NSanlneNlan:igcluenl SysIcIll - Lake Wheelcl Road Field I_abuialmy ; IiBAli 209-95
Lagoon Dcsigo and M;1I VCnlcnl lur Livestock Nlanuic Tiewi lcnl ❑nd Simage ; EBA1i 103-83
NiallaLcmenl of Daily Waslctvaler ; filiAE- I06-83
Calitllaliun of N-lanutc and WaMewatcr Applic;rtion litluipmesil ; FIIIAIi Fact Sheet
Nuisance C:onceins in Animal Nblime Man lgC111enl: Udols cold I. -tics ; l'1(U107, 1795 Colfelence Ploceediogs
ANI(Y '0vcnllici 1 1, 1996, 1':Il,c 7
Available Fium :
NCSU, C011110, l;xlcnsion Ccntci
NCSU - BAIT
14CSU - HAls
NCSU - HAl'
NCSU - tJAI,
1710lida Coupelativc I XjCIISloll

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Silocc C:lIIse IIl111's to cullfrol Iusecfs Site SI)ccific I'raclices
Liquid Systems
~I fltsh (�nttC1.5rlccunnifa[ion of sulitls ❑ 1:1us11 system is (fcsigned :11111 o1)cratctf
slifficicildy to Icnu)ve acclulnllalctl solids 611111
pilllcrs as (designed.
Ci I(CIIIt)VC Ili idgiug of aceunurialCtl sulitls at
_ tfischill lie
I.ai;urns mill Pils ( 11MCl1 Solids CI Mainlaill lagoons, SClllilig h:15llls arld flits whole
pest bicetfillg is appalco( to nlinirltizc the
cilist ing of Solids to a dc1)th of no mole [hall 6 -
8 inclics nvcr moue than 30'; of-siu face.
1;sccssivc Vcl,clalivc Decaying vc-I clalkill Cl Mainlain vegelalive conliol along hanks of
(31owth Ia1rmms amid olllcr nnllnllllllments. it) picvent
accnnli lalion of dct:lyinf; vegeullivc Inallcl'
alnnf" walel's edge on impullntlnicnl's pCI irllcter.
DI )' SySiCll15
1=cc�lcls Fcc11tilliiEalac CI I lcsif;n, u1)cra[e and nriinl:liu feed sysit:nls
hunkers and tioughs) to nlinilnize the
accuuluialinn of decaying waslage.
n Clean up spillage on a loltliuc basis {cls., 7 - 11)
day interval (1116111" surnincl; 15-30 day illlcl vat
(1111 inn xvilllcl ).
I:Cccl `storage Accntill lalions IdIced Icsidlies Cl IZcllllcc llloislllic accillllillalion wilhhl anti
stound htuncdialc Ilclinlcicr of reed storage
alcas by insllrilig (bainage away Iiou1 site
;nutlur 111oviding adc(lllalc colllai11111C11t (C.g_
Coveted Itill fol ble«r.1's grails anti siniil:n. high
riroisrl11c l,lai11 111MILICB).
C7 hisllecl for ,md lcwove or bleak up accunlnlated
solids ill liner 5111115 alntllld 1CCd 5t01ilgC as
r)cedcd.
Atv, I(IVC111hCr I I, 1996,

For mole ill fulolalion contact 111c Cuollclalivc F.-Ocllsiun Scl vice, Delml1111Ci11 of I:nlunlulugy, Box 76 13, Nultll Cmolina Stale Univeisily,
1L 16Lc b, MC, 27695-7G 1 J.
ANIIC - November 11, 1990, [ ;ige 2
HIM'S Io C:oll(rul Illseds Site Specific I'l-ndices
SII II FCC (::IIIse
AIIIIIIal Holding Airs • Accumulations of a11inviI waSlcs
CI
I:III11imile lo%v alca5 [hat hap illulsluic along
:11111 feC1I Watilage
lences and 11IIIcr Iocnliulls Miele wasic -
:lcCIIIIIIIIales and disim balwe by aliilllals IS
111llllinal.
❑
Makilain lclice lows and f 1llur sh ips arUmid
:Illilllal 1101dillg ;IMIS to IllilllliliM
a ccullillia11UnS of wastes(i.e.. inspCCI cul. and
lcnluvc ur Meal: III) acculnulalecl sulids as
Ilccciccl).
DI fNl:nlulc I lancflilig • rlccmnulalions of arlinrll ivaslC5
O
Remove spillage un a Iouline basis (eg., 7 - IU
Systems
clay inicl val 11u1 iog slnnnlci ; 15-30 eddy inlci val
11114ing %'inter) `uncle ulalnne is Iuacicd for I:lrlcf
application or disposal.
❑
I'lovicle fur adequale dmillage alunnd nlanulC
stockpiles,
CI
Inspect fur anti lcnluvc ur bmak up accunnlWed
XV;ISICS Ill f IIICI' SI1 iI)S :11 UURd r1UCkj)i1C5 111d
ll¢mme handling airas a5 nceded. -
For mole ill fulolalion contact 111c Cuollclalivc F.-Ocllsiun Scl vice, Delml1111Ci11 of I:nlunlulugy, Box 76 13, Nultll Cmolina Stale Univeisily,
1L 16Lc b, MC, 27695-7G 1 J.
ANIIC - November 11, 1990, [ ;ige 2

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method! 3) ar ,- being implemen(ed')
J Burial three fee, beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
l:nowledve of the death. The burial must be at least 300 fee: from -ulv fiowin�,
stream or pubiic body oC xater.
1 Renderinz at a rendering plant hcensed under G.S. 106-165.7
W� Complete incineration
J In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterlinarian would
ma4-e possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endanRerin,
human or animal health. (Written approval of zhe State Veterinarian must be
attached)
D. •_ _:rbc, l �. i ucr�

Example:
`tihaz sneer should you an if you wish to apply —1. tons of manure per acre with a 3 -ton soreade:?
Your snreader application width is 20 fee: and your snreader empties in b minutes.
T rave! s,eea' (mph) =
Spreader Pattern Uniformin,
'Ons C 495
6 min x 20 -t x .for&--C:C
To ae:e=ine the unzlormlty oI stread and the amount Of overlap place a Ilne or small
pans or trays epuaily spaced (2 to 4 Leet) across the spreader path. The trans s::ould be a
minimurn or 12 inches by 12 inches (or 1 inches in diameter), but no rrore than 2inches by
24 inches; and 2 inches to '!, inches deec. Nlakc one screadina pass over the carter pan.
Weizh the contents caught in each pan or pour the contents into eouail, sued bias cviinders or
dear plastic tubes and compare the anount in each.
The elective soread width can ire found ov locating the colni on either side of the path center
where manure contents causzht in the containers is half cr what it is in tre center. The distance
bettveen t% --se points is the e lective spreade. %width. Tne outer iiin_aes cL zhe coverage area
beyond these points should be overlapped on the next path to ensure a urui ornn rate ove: tree
entire Iield. "Flat-top.'."pvramid." or "oval" parterns are most desirabie and give the most
uniform application. " 1." "W." ' S—Leeple7" or "lopside" panus are not sarsfactory and one or
more of the spreader adiustme its should be made.

10. Calculate the application rate using the following formula or Table 5-3:
Anplica[ion race (mns c:e) =
lb manure colleted x !.73
ShC_; ieag[h (ft) x Shec; 1 imh (&�)
!I. R2Deat the croc2^-Lire at diiiert-nc 5 -pet -ds and/or spreader se -tines 'L'_ 61 iLhe l.esireri
appllCatlOri rate 1s achie`red,
Example:
What is the application rate (cons ver ac.-!) if yru collet; .S.` pounds or manure on a l0 -Foot o
10 -foot tarp during a calibration ran?
$.= lb manure x 3 ;. 7 3
.aaoiicar,cn rate l;onsracrcj � ion✓dre
10 a x 10 t
Table -4-3. Calibration of Solid Manure Spreaders
Pounds of "Ylanure Tons of ?Manure AppliediAcre
Aooiit.d to Shea;
Size of Ground Snee;
3' x T 10' x 10' 12' x 12'
l
0.:;
0.22
0.1:
2
0.63
0.�,=

Multiply the manure density by the cubic fee: can_ achy of the spreader and divide ov :000
to ae: the tons of maiena- i in a soreade: load.
Nve;ght o[ = 47i m anurt x i.] x sorC_C_: ca=cir 1
sprc_dt: load (tcris) = 7000
Solid and Semi -Solid Manure Spreaders
In order to c:;iibrate a spreader for solid manure (20 , erce It or,-nore sol=ds .:i e rc:lowing
plater als are needed: T
1. Bucket
2. P[as 1 s' nr berms =t. S tee: ov S re:—% 10 :ez: p`. 10 e2, or 1� Beet
«.t c pact.., t,...r� or old � e .n e�.-z �.�.., _ .
by 12 feat. "ill make calculations easier.
�. Scales
C_-! �rat.or, rnv od:
1. Locate a large and reasonably smooth, plat area %%here manure can ce acniied.
_. Spread the Blastic sheet; tai V Or bed Sies700th1V andnPthe v.CunC.ii
Fiil the spreader with manure to the nornal operauna leve?. Dn e the sLreace- at the
no=,nal anollcatlon speed toward the sheet spread on the ground. aft%% ir:C the manure to
beai_n leaving the spreader at an even, no # rate.
4. Drive over the sleet at the nom al application speed and seiings while continuing to
apply manure. IS a rear discharge spreader is used, threz- passes should be made: rirst,
give directly over the anter of the sheet, the other nvo on opposite sides of the center at
the normal spreader spacing overlap.
5. Weigh the empty bucket and plastic sheet, tarp. or blanket.
6. Collect all manure spread on the sheet and place it into the bucket.
7. We;cii bucket and manure and subrract the weight of the empv; bucket and around sheet.
This%yiil Give you the pounds of manure applied to the s; -lee:.
S. Repeat :he procedure three times to get a reliabie average.
9. Dete 1i. -1e the average weiaht of the three rzanure applications.
OF! .SIF—•lar:. .-. ,co-_�. l,i

C;,LIERA ION OF MANURE SPREAGCRS
EFiectivt-_ utLnza:ion of manure is not possible if you do not know ho%v much is he:"'_a scread Ove. a
given 2_re. Caiibradon of your spreader is a simple and effective wav of'rnorovine utilization of
nutrients in manure snore effectively. Only by the anniication rate of your szreader can ou
correctly aooiv manure to correspond to your crop nee^s and pre , ent water eua-il7v problems roux
the o,.. -e.- aponcauon of aiimal Manure. '
A policators can at7oly manure. at valving rates and oatic-ns. decendin2 on for'.t'ard tra,,,-e: anL/cr
PTO O Speed_ Sear box senin_Qs, Rate ooe:unQs. ocerathng pressures. spread widths and overlans.
Calibration defines the combination of settings and :ravel speed needed to apply r.-iarure. bending
or wastewater at a desired rate and to ensure uniform appiication.
Spreader Capacity
Liouid spreader capacities are no=aily rated by tZie inanufacrurer in gallons. Multiply by 0.0012
to Re, tons.
Solid =,G semi-solid spreaders are rated by the manufacturer e:th er in bushels or cubic feet
(multiply bushels bv 1.2^ to Ret cubic fee:). Nwfost spreaders have two rating capacities: (1) stiuck
or level fill, and (2) heaped. Calibration of solid manure spreaders based on its capacity'
(volume) is dift-icult to estimate accurately because the density of solid and semi-solid nanures
are quite va.;able. Density is the weight of the manure per volume of manure ( pounds per cubic
foot). Manure density varies depending on the type and amount of bedding used as well as its
storage method. Therefore, if you estimate spreader application rates as the volume of the
manure the spreader holds you are overlooking the fact that some manure weighs snore than other
manure. a hi,s can cause a signilic ant error wizen calculatins manure application rates.
Since manures and liners have different derisiiies, an on-farm test should be done. To dete=*ne
The load (tons) of a manure spreader:
1. Weiah an empty 'gallon bucket.
2. Fill the bucket level full with the material to be spread. Do not pack the raterial in the
bucket but ensure that it settles similar to a loaded spreader.
Weigh the bucket again. Subtract the empty bucket weight from this weight to calculate
the weight of the contents.
Multiply weight of contents by 1.5 to calculate pounds der cubic fee:, density.
�i'L�IP—:�I�rei 17. iP97—?:2e 13

FORM St -u --I SI>rrry and Sludge Application I-ields Record
For Recording Slun'y and [-acJoan Sludge Application F -vents on Different Fields
1 amt Owner f=acility iduniber
Spreader Operator ^
Tract II
f=ield
Dale
(nu1ihldlyr)
Cluj) Type
f=ield Size
(acres)
Applicalion
Method `
It of toads
per f=ield
Volume of Loads
(gallons)
Sr = soil incoiporaled (disked) OR = 6roadcasl (surface applied)
7 Can ho found in operalors manual for llro spreader, Cvnlad a local dealer if you rfu mil Piave ynur urmer's nrannal.

FORM SLD -2
-1 fact 11
Held Size (acres) = (A)
l=ain Owner
Ovmer's Address
Owner's Phone 11
SIt_rrry ani[ Sludge Application Field Record
011e l-olrn for L=ack f=ield her Crop Cycle
Facility Number r 1 -
Spreader Operalm
Spreader Ohcralor's
Address
Operator's !'hone 11
I?X111.(,
From Waste Utilization flan
Crop lyreRecorrrnremled PAN
IT I Loading (lbslacre) = (D)
(1) (2) (3) (5) (0) (7) (Q)
Date
nrnrhldlyr
!1 of Loads (ler Field
,
Volume of Loads
Molal Voluurc
(gallons)—HL
(3) x (2)
Volume per Acre �
(dallacre)
1}_
A)
, 7
Waste Analysis f AN
( Ibs11000 gal)
Applied
(lbs/acre)
(i)—{= x 5}-
-(-
1000
i•lilroden Llalance ,
(Ibslac(e)
(B) - 7
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signa(We
Cerlifie(I Operalor (P14il
Opuralor's Signalme
Operator's Geltificalioli ido.
'Call be folr3H1 in operatof's manual for the spreader. Contact a local denlcr if you (to net have year otivner's manmil
' NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Eslirnate, Technical Goide Section 033.
3 Enter the Value received by s+,rhtfacting column (7) born (B). Conlinue sulibactinq column (7) frons colurrrn (tl) follorling each application event.

Fow.i lim-1
Farre Otivner
Irrigation Operator
Urgeorr Liquid Iraigalion f=ields Record
For Recording lrrigalioti L=vetils ori Different f=ields
Facility NUIllher -
Tract Il
Field #
Date
nunlclrl/ r
Cro p Typeacres
Field Size
Irrigation Time
11hu:iter of
5 linkle,rs O 1eralinr
-
e�

11
AAL
\.Zv
I -X l I 115 . -
FORM IRR -1 1_190011 Lirluid Irrigalioll f=ields Pecortl
For Recording h0galion 1_venls on (Different f=ields
FL -11 In Oviner � ,lee f ��.rd _� I-ncility Number I X X 1 X x X \ \ x
III igntioll01)c):)lur
Tract !f
Field #Croy
Date
(nimhkllyr)_
Type�,
f=ield Size
arres
11ric alion fiMe
NLu� ber of
S irinklers O peralinr
Lj
- _ r 11111P,
Tn rs
r/0JI
I
r1(arei7J 1995
ell
JI
J,N4.
!
lI(arP i 1I, 199J
(.eer.
J7
.1.111 a_...
.S: h)P...
3,10
!
7fcku
1
r{(ara i 13 1995
J. A) A...
J. NP.r.
(A)
f
7
rI(w.liT6 1995
�r�,..ara
it
J_'Ne,e.-
5: A7 "w.
ITU
I
T
rl(4P�71,Iws
J.tVa,..
7:1U�...
f0d
1
Aw
1
ef(dr2o, /NJ
(,ire
Jl
J.,Va,...
6.00L.._
6,11
1
1
rrI 71 1993
ell
J1
J Na.
/.A7 ,.
660
1
1
rt(Pr 71, 1995
Cir*
ill
d, Al a, .,
9: /Or. •.
1170
!
%lfk�5
7
[l.e 1, 1990
�.r..e'a
if
.5.A)r...
1/.I\7r...
J6[)
f
1
f.c , 1993
Urrw.aa
J/
-1,1112,1.
fl. iv
(21)
1
1995(eir......
if
-1.(kl?-
12.Nt..,
SIU
!
1, 1993
%w1..4
if
J.N ..
U.A)a. -
310
!
1
II.e S, 1990
j7.rw.oi
J!
J. 011-
I:JS�.
135
/

FORM IRR -2 Lagoon Inigaliorl f=ields Record
Die Fomi for Each Field her Crop Cycle -
1 rad 11 Field 11 Facility Humber
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner Ilrigaliun Opelator
Ovrnel's Address Irrigation i}pelatur's
Addless
Owner's Phone 11 011e(:11rn's Phone 11
From Waste Utilizalion flan
Clop typo Ileeonurreuilcel 1'Af 1 l.o.'oholl
I [Ib!a[rC) - ICI}
[31 171 f71 [41 (51 (C) 17) (U) (9) (1(1] (Y11
DaleU
nin,ldcflyl
I l rilla I io 11
Waste Analysis PAIr
Illrll[IUUQaI]
r'AI1 Applies
(tblaclul
_{O1 � {J]_
11100
IIIIFU(lefl naiarlGe 1
(Iblacre)
(I11 . {1U]
51.101in,u
find lime
-total
fAlnules
ul sprinklers
Uh['1aling
flc,vr flaLr
[galhnlnj
lulalVulunlu
[Unlluns)
Voltww
perA[ru
p�alracic)
(A)
Crop Cycle Totals
Owflut's siglu-111110
Certirred Operator (Prim)
OpLialur's sfgnalure
Opelatol's Ccltilicalion No.
HCOA Wasle Anaylysis or L=quivalent or rJRCs Eslinlale' 'I eclulical Grride Serlion 633,
' Enler the value (ecetved by sublracling cakunln (10) [roil] (©). Curllillue subtlacling culunul (10) frunr CUllllllll (1 r) fullcrwilly Ci1Cll illigillion event.

FORM IRR -2 Lagoon lidgalion Fields Record
Oi)e Forel for f=ach 1-iold per Clop Cycle
I,f ac1 1)
Held Si4c (;]cies) = (A)
Farm Oviner
Ovrl,rl's Address
Qenler's Phone f1
fi'm field 11 I
JI
17J
919 JSS�lflf
1;X11 f
I-acility Number XXXXX I XXXXX-
luic);Itiun Operalor
waste Analysts PAI ,
1lulluuU ga)
,l,"f';f� f
I[rilpti0n Operalul's
Slal1 lime
/lrlthc:ss
%1.a.. ,1`i::rJlr
o lel alul's Phurt4 11
9/v 133 f41r
From Waste Wilizaliun Plan
Crop Type 6....lrtq 11 commmided PAN� feu )
Loading (11)lacre) _ (B)
111 r71 173 r41. ISI r01 171 fill (91 (101 MI
U, lc
nunlddl r
Y
I,IIeJllioll
waste Analysts PAI ,
1lulluuU ga)
['All nlli'ller]
(Ild,lcle)
U • U
(_) _ f_)
iUUU
tJiuoilcn 1lalance'
(IUrac,c)
U � IU
( I ( )
Slal1 lime
End Tilne
lolal
)dlnules
P) PI
u or $prluhle,S
p clalin[
P J
flour rials
tgallr„in)
lolal Volume
(gallons)
(61 " (5) • (4)
Vulun,e
pet Aao
(9a11acre)
fj
(A)
J.cv/-
1`70
I
vN
mf (kv
N19
>S
rJ..f
AU.S
J,Nr -.
J.tl7�..
!TJ
I
f(I)
0`6. (A 1;
Sl1Y
J,3
IJ,J
J/J,0
,I/Tl/S'S
3Ne..
7.401...
fN
I
fell
lognv
3161
7.J
/J,9
000
S.N ..
N.IU�..
Jho
r
IN
111 av
WS
7J
/l6
VJ1.3
— - —
1T. CU
f70
1
flu
16,1 (nv
J11V
7.3
IJ J
JJJ O
A/J/4S
J 17P..
/I IU...
510
f
1N
:I6 A1)
6w
T.S
14 e
J17
A/f/YS
J cV/..
IT,rU..
510
0Ail
T.J
f/ f
JrUJ
A/-s/yJ
S All.
7.-JSr,.
ISS
1
fl)?
67rri,
;,,IU
7.1
3 0
1 ?3.7
Crop Cycle Totals
i -i ,nu
rar.s
Ovrftel's Signallife
Codified Operator (Plirtl) J. Pppd'
Opel.Ilur's ai�n❑foie IL, (1',
J"
Operllol's CL'11111C:k11(}[1 Plu, 0,J2/
I HCD11 Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or HRCS rslinlale, fectnliral Guide Sudiolt 633.
Enter 1he value recelved by stibiracling column (10) from (B). Cn[ttiml(, sulrilataillo culunul (10) 110111 r,ulunln (1 1) follovring each iuigation event.

Forth nRY-3
Tract 11
Fi1_Ic( Size (acres) = (Al
Farrel Owner
Ovrncr's Address
OL•mels 1'11onu 1)
Field (1
Cary Lilter Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle -
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operalor's Phone 11
From Animal Wasle Management flan
Crop Tyne Recommended PAN
Loading (1hlocre) = (13)
(3)
(5)
(7)
(a)
F_
Dale
(rnn1/4b11yl)
a nl I n:,ds Ile( fiuld
Weiphl of Loads
(Ions)
Total W1:ight
(Inns)
(2) (3)
Weighl Per Acre
(Ions/ac)
(l) + (A)
Waste Analysis' PAI 1
PAI I Appliur
(1111ac)
l!shogun Balance '
(IUlac)
Crap Cycle: Totals
Oviner's Signature
Spreader Operaim's Sic3rnalure
r -;III 11C 1410111 in LIJIU tur'5 Inal111M 1111 the spreaticr. Cawacl a Incas dealer it ymi do 1u11 I1avc yonr nwncr's mmm;il
i c )'Imr wast: unmaLLnlclll piall fur sampling (icllnency. A( n nliniulnnl, %vaslL nnnlysis is rcgnilcll Willlin (M ti;l)'s o1 1.11111 ;y)plic:atiun cvcnls.
I?nlcl 1110 V010C ICL'L--IVCII by S11lItrnL6111; C01nIIlrl (7) nolle (11). Conlimic sulma llnl, column (7) I•Irn11 Cnlninn (8) ruIIII1 111, L;Idl applicallnn cvcn1-
.
t •k .

No Ration of Chan-ae of O�- 2rship
Aninial Waste'Management Facility
{please type or print all inrormaticn that doe, not require a signawre
In accordance with the requirements of 15A NCAC ?H .02l7(a)(l)(H)(.x[l) this Lorin is official
notification to the Division of eater Quality (DWQ) of the transfer of ownershta of an :animal Wasie
Management Facility. This form must be submitted to DEA no later than 60 days following the transfer
ofownet-ship.
General Information:
Name o f Farm:
Previous Owner(s) Name:
New Owner(s) game:
flailing Address:
Farm Location:
Latitude and Londirude:
ac`o: -
hone `o:
Fhone No:
Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit:
1 Councy:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specii`ic: road
names. directions, milepost. etc.):
Overation Descrintion:
ype of Swine NO. of Anintals
Wean to Feed,::
Fceder to Finish
Farrow to «r,enn
Farrow to Fe_,.,..
Farrow to Finish
TYpe of Poulin- No. of Animais
-1 Laver
:1 Pullets
Orher Tepe of Liti-esrock:
Type of Carde
Dairy
,Vv. of Anima;S
Number or .Anirr,als:
Acreage Available. for Application: Required Acreage:
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds : Total Cauacirv'. Cubic Feet (Its)
Owner / Nlanager Agreement
I (eve) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for tae farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing desi_m capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that these must be no discharge of animal waste tram
the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or lion a scorn
event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. I {we}
understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards
dove?oped by the Natural Resources Conservation Servicc. The approved plan will be tiled at the farm and at the office oe the
local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (%ve) know that any modification must be approved by a tec7nical specialist and
submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to imolementation. A change in lard ownersnip requires writte i
notification to DWQ or a new certification (if the approved plan is changedl within 60 days of a title trans, .e .
Name of New Land Owner :
Signature: Date:
Name of Nlanager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Please sign and return this form to: N. C. Division Of W'ater Qualit,•
Water Quality Section. Compliance Group
R:.ile;,,h. _XC ?7626-0F;;
NCO -- 11:1% ?. 1996
Y

Research Farm Dairy
Dairy,Waste,Storage Structure
Rowan, NC
Design Criteria:
150 Dairy cows at 1.400 [bs. each = 210.000 lbs. live weight
180 days storage
5 gal./day/cow of waste water
40.000 sq. ft. of non -pond Drainage Area
Waste from i=reestall area and access alleys will be scraped and stored
In the waste storage pond. Waste water from the milk barn will also be
stored in the waste storage pond, as well as the runoff from
approximately 40,000 sq. ft, of the barns and lot.
I. Storage Volume Required
A. Manure Storage
150 cows X 14,6 gal./day/cow X 180 days
----------------- 52.701 cu. ft.
7,48 gals./cu.ft.
B. Wastewater from Milk Barn
150 cows X 5 gal./day/cow X
180 days
18.048 cu. ft.
7,48 gals./day/cow
C. Normal Runoff from Open Areas for 180 days
Drainage Areas = 40,000 sq. ft.
1 day CN 98 130 day CN 92
Months Rainfall (inches)
Runoff (inches)
March 4,61
3,71
April 3,38
2,53
May 3,66
2,79
June 4,20
3,31
July 4,61
3,71
August 3,97
3,09
24,43
19,14
19,14 runoff inches X 40.000 sq. ft.
---- ----------- ----- ---- — ---- 63.800 cu. ft.
12 inches / ft.
D. Waste Feed and Bedding
20 cu. ft. / day - X 180 days= 3.600 cu. ft.
TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED 138.149 cu. ft.

- Add to . ,-jid Volume -
II, Normal Rainfall less evaporation on Structures for 180 days
March - August rainfall = 24,4 inches
Annual evaporation 39 inches X 0.5 yr. = 19,5 inches
Excess = 4,93 inches = 0,5 ft.
Ill. 25 yr. storm on Open Area of 40.000 sq. ft,
CN = 95 for open areas
With 25 yr. 1 day strom of 6.0 inches, runoff = 5,41 inches
40.000 sq. ft. X 5,41 inches runoff
18.033 cu. ft,
12 inches
18.033 cu.ft.
------ -------- ------------------------- ____ _ _-- 0,7 ft.
25.984 sq. ft. surface area of storage pond
IV. 25 yr. storm on Pond Surface
25 yr. 1 day storm = 6,0 inches — 0,5 ft.
V. Emergency Spillway
25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 inches
Peak discharge = 3.2 cfs.
Use ESW with 12 ft. bottom width,
3 to 1 side slopes, 0.2 ft. stage 0,2 ft.
VI. Freeboard = 1,0 ft.
VII. Total Depth of Pond 8 feet of storage = 10,89 ft.

depth area of the bottom
200 X 80 +
X 16.ODO +
1.3
area of the top
232 X 112 • 4 X
25 984
124 928
area of the mid-section
216 X
82.944
= 162.406 designed amount
156.182 amount needed
6.224 amount surplus
• - n

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF I
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
i
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 13, 1998
Raymond Coltrain
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd.
Rm�f Salisbury, NC 28144
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Piedmont Res. Station, Facility #: 80-1
Rowan County, NC
i
Dear Mr. Coltrain:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
March 9, 1998. It is requested that you provide this office with a copy of your waste
application records by March 31, 1998. Please send the copies to the attention of Mr.
Johnson. Also, no permit is required for the separated solids (manure/bedding) that are
currently being sold.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Glea?nP.�E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rowan SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
91 9 NORTH MAIN STREET, MogREsVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POSY -CONSUMER PAPER

X11❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency .
a
00Hivision of Water Quality ,
A
1111SWoutine O Complaint O Follow-up'of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
[� Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered efeertified. 13 Applied for Permit E3 Permitted 0 Not O erational -I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: !� ..'i.. trLtit� l?' A10,7 County:.....................................................................................
OwnerName ........... X/ j>,,A,..... .,...QS............................................... Phone No:...= .R... Z. ..........................................
Facility Contact: .....,f (.khL4t4 \ ..1. .i .. Title .. Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: ... ,�1 S �.I.S..S?.5.+r� ........................................ .�... L
....,4 ..............7�itCC' t... i Q� .............
Onsite Representative:........k 5( r ........... Integrator:............................................................
Certified Operator,.....pfc�... L'© l h ................. Operator Certification Number,.....................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �•'�' �"
Subsurface Drains Present JJU Lagoon Area 1❑ Spray Field Area
"IF] No Liu uid Waste Manaeement S
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 'kfNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Ayes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field %Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, dill it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IV No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ONO
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ YesNo
maintenance/improvement?
14 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ YesNo
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes L
No
Structures (Lagoons.Holdirify Ponds Flush fits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage} less than adequate? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
For Certified or Permitted Facilities, Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'!
0 No.violations or deficiencies were noted during this.visit..You will receive no further
correspondence about this. visit., .. ' ..
immmts (refer to
draw`question #): Explain any YES answers and/oi any recom
e ings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes 'K[No
❑ Yes
_,�KNo
tjG,Sle,Ira GGrTidh ✓2'C���s ate— rld� ��l�l'�/rte/ e, /5� cp� sk)"11 bf_-
WtaQS S 0a"" cis uP ACJ WA� JC7
_( e -V ej,
7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name (}1e
IL Sdlj
Reviev<er/InspecturSlgnature: aAs,Q Date: 3
Identifier: ................ .........................................
...................................
Freeboard(ft): ..........................................................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
J `o
1 l .
is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
Av,"�o
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'!
❑ Yes
[}4\Q
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
o
W'asfe Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
AKI'i\o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
\
15.
Crop type t.....F. .&....._ pa.A5.......:............................:......................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those design.rfed in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
Cl Yes
2 kIN,o
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement`'
❑ Yes
<IN0
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
r -l -\'o
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Q No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
[:]Yes
M\o
22.
Does record keeping need improvement'?
)K yes
EXNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities, Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'!
0 No.violations or deficiencies were noted during this.visit..You will receive no further
correspondence about this. visit., .. ' ..
immmts (refer to
draw`question #): Explain any YES answers and/oi any recom
e ings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes 'K[No
❑ Yes
_,�KNo
tjG,Sle,Ira GGrTidh ✓2'C���s ate— rld� ��l�l'�/rte/ e, /5� cp� sk)"11 bf_-
WtaQS S 0a"" cis uP ACJ WA� JC7
_( e -V ej,
7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name (}1e
IL Sdlj
Reviev<er/InspecturSlgnature: aAs,Q Date: 3

-1� State of North Carolina6 ` _
Department of Environment, IT
Health and Natural Resources •
Mooresville Regional Office f
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary 1DEHNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28144
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Piedmont Res. Sta., Facility #: 80-1
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Coltrain:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, FAX [phone]
Mooresville, Borth Caroline 28115 N%ICAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/1V., post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Rowan SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. �n,�-,
Water Quality ginal Supervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Raymond Coltrain
NC Dept. of Agriculture
Piedmont Experiment Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd.
Salisbury, NC 28144
Dear Mr. Coltrain:
I M-1'0W'J U
T 0 0
WPM
Adolowdoundft�EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 24, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Piedmont Experiment Station, Facility #: 80-1
Rowan County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on March 20, 1997 by Mr. Alan
Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are indicated in the
report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
As a certified farm your files, at a minimum, need to contain the following:
Certification forms
Site schematic
Waste application records
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste management plan (if applicable)
The waste utilization plan is a component of the waste management plan
Soil analysis records
Your local Soil and Water Conservation District or Natural Resource Conservation Service can Assist you with
this information.
Any Rather correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. Also, please be
advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation as well
as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. If you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
L.:
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Rowan SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
LIJ
919 North Main Street, � FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 [; _ _.,� 50°k recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

F 4
❑ DSWC Animal dlot Operation Re�Iew {
x,
# x
BDWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection 4 ��
Routine O Complaint O Follow-uof DWQ ins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection .- ' Use 24 hr. time
Farm'Statiss: �D6 7, , , _ •, Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: _». J!! S' .l��f? L.... [�..5 ..... f ............ County:..-. ...... __........».....».......-.........
Owner Name:....- 1x Vul, ..... ga�------...Phone No:. 2.2_...... �? .» ......�»._
Mailing Address:._...71.. »v . . , �3,C.�Y��1.�.... ��� ..- �. � 45 �u�' ».»..� .......__ 2 V .. -
OnsiteRepresentative: » .......»_......_..... ....... ................. ....... .»....».......-...... ....... . Integrator: ... _...... .......... .»...... »- ...
......�..-_.............. _
Certified Operator: _..,••: k?? Y ....— Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
..Q � j! :o.�... �....�i�...Fxz.�......._.,�:(�......e:�.. _ sr ���u�r` _»..1?.�...-......f _....�.-..�.�....__......_......._....-.......»_..--......M,......_ 4
y Latitude w 6 . [f Longitude w iL -
QNot Operational ww��ll ��rr Date Last Operated:.. -...... e,�SC ` J_rw. JJ ... ..................._...... «. ............ ...................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
$
.,
Swine,. s `; N
`Number ;YNtimlier3..
u ...., ...Number
;, vPouitry
.';Cattte.,,,;,x
❑ Wean to Feeder
. ` ❑ La er
' 4
br0_B
❑ Feeder to Finish1
, ❑ Non -Laver
ef
.1
Farrow to Wean
t Farrow to Feeder...
Farrow to Finish
❑ Other Type of
Livestock
Number of Lagoons f Holding Pouds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 4
,4* r ❑ Lagoon Area �4%❑ Spray Field Area,k
,»
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes 0KNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes I'No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes D?No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after I/l/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Laeoon 2 Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion; or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste,applleation
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ._.. ..!1l!``�Y1............. ...... ..... _..... ........ ».».............
» .. ...
11 lb ,a,Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
;,,.• 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
1 S. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
} 22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
7
❑ Yes KNos-
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes O�No
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes ;qNo
❑ Yes Jallo
[]Yes 'No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
Vivo
❑ Yes
ONO
f Yes
❑ No 'e
❑ Yes
RNo
Cl Yes
uTi
®,No
❑ Yes
�iNo
❑ Yes
RNo
Comments (refer to' question #): Explain.any YES answem-and/or airy recommendations or-anyother comments
Use drawin 's of facili to better a Iain situations 'use addttrona] a es as necessary) ;, t:...
r� ` ark k0,01
'2�Cc V- A5
4
Vt�d
.Y,
a
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section;-`acility Assessment Unit 11/14/96
I

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd
Salisbury NC 28144
Dear Farm Owner:
kvahwA
A&14�j7i
�EHNR
N.C. I)MpT. 01r
ENVIi20NMENT, HEALTH.
& NATURAL RFS(-)Ui:C:}�S
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation DEC 12 1996
Facility: Piedmont Research Station
Facility ID #: 80-1 DIVISION OF EIIVIR611MI11TAt MANAGEMENT
Rowan County MOORESVILLE REG110Al OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC,
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and .
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
�Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality. Files
Water Pollution Control S stem ow" �# 4 Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators CertifIoctlon Commission N'"Vc An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% Post -consumer paper

J` +_1 �- " av y. 11\'-11I LLII WI II I\ LiVI ILS 4 I _L__k •1-1 1V
_ Site Requires Initrrediate Attention:
Facility No. 11
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Farm Name/Ownt
Mailing Address:
County:. �taI –
DATE: 1995
Time: �ti
Integrator•. Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: `T
Physical Address/Locadon: `
Type of Operation: Swine — Poultry — Cattle K_
Design Capacity: l Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE_ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW,
Latitude: ' _" Longitude: '
Circle Yes or No
Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) &or No Actual Freeboard: _J_ t. --2— Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or(�) Was any erosion observed? Yes or&
Is adequate; land available for spray? es r No Is the cover crop adequate? fibor No
Crop(s) being utilized:.,..�`�—
Does the facility meet SCS rninimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Qor No
100 Feet from Wells? Yzbr No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or o
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or(R)
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or &� If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management: records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? or No
Additional Comments: �I �i 4-
Inspector amt: Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.O2

a. 1 � I I ..+I I }JL1 1 WI � I •..1 � L.VI i4... 1 I I ..f L. �. i a �.i v
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.'
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: ,1995
Time:
Fax m NuWOwns
Mailing Address:
•
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical AddreswI=ation:--
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: , `E, Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACI_ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude:.' Elevation: _--__—_Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches)el' r No Actual Freeboard: ___LYt. - -Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or& Was any erosion observed? Yes oqa3
Is adequath land available for spra%y?
or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes No
Crop(s) being utilized: '
Does the facility meet SCS minimum
criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?Q)t)r No
100 Feet from Wells? (Qbr No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes okNO
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or(
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, Iand applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Eee ar No
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.Q2

State of North Carolina i
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality I IKXJ
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
'I 67,?W'A
if 0 0
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
ftc
November 6, 2000 ,N 'R0Pq�D
OP
RRALra
RMOiria
Raymond Coltrane
Piedmont Research Station 8 200D
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd
Salisbury NC 28144 � Mawft QAflfie'4F11�
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC80000I
Piedmont Research Station
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
Dear Raymond Coltrane:
In accordance with your application received on July 8, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to the NC Dept of Agriculture, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Piedmont Research Station Farm, located in Rowan County,
with an animal capacity of no greater than 150 Dairy and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC800001 .f
Piedmont Research Station
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting -the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sinc el ,
-e Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
RowanCounty Health Department
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

Stjte of orth Carolina R EC E1' VEt7
Department of Environment and Natural Resources WATER QJAL,TYSlwrTlp;v
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form QUL 0 8 1999
(THIS FORM M.4 Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General -Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operationk"'DisChaige p'em►;tVng
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Piedmont Research Station -
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: NC Dept of Agriculture
1.3 Mailin: address: 8350 Sherrills Ford Rd
City, State: Salisbury NC Zip: 28144
Telephone Number (include area code): [phone]
1.4 County where facility is located: Rowan
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Approx. 1 North of the intersection of Hwv 80 I and
SR 1526.miles (Sherrills Ford Rd.) . On Sherrills Ford Rd.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Raymond Coitrain
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/54
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.. �80(county number); _1 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description_: Cattle operation
150- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? Fyes: =no. If no. correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The ''No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er ror which the waste management structures were designed.
Tvpe of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
> Wean to Feeder ) Laver > Dairy
Feeder to Finish > Non -Laver ) Beef
Farrow to Wean (# sow) ) Turkey
) Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
> Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: F
p d� y , 3 1__3% No. of animals:
AK
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page I of 4 so- I

Facility Number: 80 - I
Facility Name: Piedmont Research Station
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
N.C. DEPT . OF AGRICULTURE (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for PIEDMONT RESEARCH STATION (Facility name listed in question 1.l)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if ail required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to m_t a,n ire./
Signature Date JUNE 30, 1999
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
RAYMOND D. COLTRAIN
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for PIEDMONT_ RESEARCH STATION (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returne�cWple;eool
Signature
Date JUNE 30, 1999
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPOR'T'ING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 3 of 4 80-1

tar " ' A
Anirnal N�aste Management Plan Cet , ication
(Please type or orint all information that doe; not reuuire a silin ref
E.XcistinQ or::: NeIV or. � `-- Esparided "(please circle. one) :
dame of Farn:
Owner(5) Name.- A" ._ t o �-7
Facility No:
Phone No: -Ml 278_�422�-
l,laiiins .address: .d. Zo��� sl -
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: eL!) _Of
Latitude and Lon�;tuce: �' ��/4f
jf° 7� d�� Integrator: _
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe beiow (Be specific: road
names. dire:::ions. miieoost. e:c.):
Operation Descrintio'n:
Type of 5+vine ivo. ofAnimais
_
Type of ('rein: No. of Animals
Type ar Carrie No. oi.,nhirals
:1 wean to F -ceder
_.1 Layer
Z Dairy 1 tQ
:1 F, -.der to Finish
.i Pullets
—1 Beef
Farrow to wean
.:i Farrow to Ft -vier
.D Farrow to Finish
Other Tvpr of Livestock:
Number of Aninna:s:
:1 Gilts
`1 Boars
.?OE.pandngp�j
A....
PreMrrs-fleslzr..Canacir =. ` ::....'rldiriorai Desi�n.C. arrctty.:otal.Desi�ir
Ca,badrtti :
acreage available for application: . Required .acreage:
Number of La_oons / Storage Ponds Total Capacity: �� �OG Cubic Feet (ft')
.are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or 0 (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
ail*A*Mit it K K k.Kat)IM flANA-A1R** Ail }l ii A KAmA K. AAA** *A* A 4*" -Am -AM* A A. KT.T..sa}I Kf[:![]!tK Kia -**a It ]t it K3tKw XKs.K
Owner / N lanager rrreement
I (we) vet-ifv that all the above information is correct and will be. uodawd upon chanziwz. I (we; undersiand die uoe::ttiun
and maintelance procedures established in the approved animal waste managezteat plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedurrs. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage. system or construction of new facilities will require a new certiticatiun to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Managernem before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no disc:targe of
animal waste from the storage or application syste n to stutace waters of Lbe state etdter directly dirousl: a mail -made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe Than dee 25 -year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from die
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards develuped by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
tiled at the farut and at the office of the local Soil and water Conservation District.' I (we') know ,that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Nater Conservation District prior to
implementation. A,chanae-in-land ownership requires written nodiication to DEMI or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title trap er,.(
\Tame of Land Owner : /l ed�74nc�I / Cr1/i®ilr �C 211 c1�t �Yl
Signature:
Name of N
.AIVC -- .Aug st t. 199 ...._
vale:
porn owner):

L
� T
Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North CUOlitla Soil and Water Cunserti•atiun Commission pursuant to l_5A
NCAC 6F .000:. l certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan -that meeu or excC-.ds standards and specitications of the Division of Environtnental Management
(DEN1) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USD? -Natural Resources Conser:atiun Sen -ice (NRCS)'antilur the
North Carolina Soil and Water Cunsera•adon Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001.
.0005. The following elements are included in the planus applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
waft may sign each certification (SD. SI. WTjTP, RC. I). the technical specialist should only certif;: paxts for which the,: are
technic2lly competent_
II. Certification of Design
• A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Svstem
Cried the appropriate &ox
E.ristine facility withQut retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storaee volume is adequate for operation capacity -
requirements. ,
stora_!e caaahility consiszent with tv;tste utilization
J `ew. exnanded or reirotitted facility_ (SD)
animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to coli{ctiUn 3% '11S. lago n; and pupils.
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum smnJuds anti specifiCations.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): �Cn c c- es� _
.kfiiliation S G Date Wort Comoleted:
Address ( a ncy) - C Phone `o.:_7611- G'37 --&d q
Signature: 2 Bly6 Date:
B) Land rpt Dlication Site, (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers): adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management: hvdraulic and nutrient loadine rates.
Name of Thnical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation S L'�G Date Work Completed:
:kddress (A�e cy) 2 D I C Phone No.: 74
Si�k2nature: 2 8'�tiG Datz:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the anproprrare ba.r
.,,1 Facility without exterior lots ($D .or WUP or RC)
Thii facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from louming and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by `+RCS.
Name of T cal Specialist (Phrase Print): .7i��R Or
iiiiation Date Wore Comolz:ed:
Address-(A.zencv): V.17ZA/-) Ific Phone No.:Vq 1_3z_&a2�/
SiJna[ure: 28!yG Date:, _/9-�-
.a,.%•C -- 1. 199 -

D). Apolication and Handone Eauinment
Check the appropriate box ~
ist g nr expanding tncility with existing tiv a5tt anrlica[irna�cluinrnent ffl' 'P or D
,animal waste appiicadun equipment specified in the plan has been eidtcr ticki caiibrated or evaluated .
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate L
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specitied hvdrauiic or nutrient loading races. a schedule for timing of applications has been
establisher!: required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidanc: ire c.:ntained as part of
the plan).
Ye_w. expanders. or existing facility without existing w asce acclication„eaiiiprn.z^c for znr v trrigntinn. (I)
Animal waste applicatiun equipment specified in the plan has been designed ro apoiv :Waste as necassary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed aopiicacion equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at races not to exceed either the specifie;l hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and ad'susanent guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
New. expanded. or exict'ne roc:lily wichnu( eYi<tina wnsre :armlicadon eeuinment tier !.anti .nreadins not i.itirnq
gray irrialtion, OV(;P or 1)
Animal Waste application equipment specitied in the plan has been selected to appy waste as necessar; co
accommodate the waste managemenc plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not io ,exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adiustment L7uidanc.- are
-contained as part of the plan).
Name.of T nicai Specialist (Please Print):P"Irt-'_tt(!So
Affiliation 5 L) c Date Worms Comole:ed:
,address Phone No.: V _I Of
6 - Q
Signature: 2�/'�6Daie: _3 _fes ' --
E) Odor Contro-_l. insect Control. 'Mortality Management and EmerQencv .a-c_rion Plan (SD
SI. WI P. RC or 1)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist. a 1r[urtality Management Checklist and an Emergency Ac:iun Plan. Sources of bods odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Nfanagvment PratLices to Minimize Odors and Best
Nfanagement Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
`-lorta.h[v N[anagement Plan and the Emer?encyrrlytion Plan are compiete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of T
Affiliation
cal Specialist (Please Print):
Address ( Rcy)
S i,.nature:
Date Work Completed:
Phone `o.:2
�, Date: Jk,
F) Written Notice of New or Exaandina Swine Farm
The follom-ring signature block is only to be used for new or expanding s%vine fauns that begin construction after June
21. 1996. If the racility_ was built before June 21. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that 1(we) have auemoted to contact by ceruf ed trail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who ow -i property located across a public road. street. or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-305. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
aaached. / 1.4
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
- _ Name of Manager (if uitf 7z!nc from owner):
Sianature: Date:
AWC Au-,usul. 199 3

III. Certification of.Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
New. e,manded or retrot ned Cacility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have bean installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet ore ,ceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities. without retrofits, no cerriircarion is necessarv.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
�.ffiliatio
Daae Work Comnletea:
Address (a??rtcy): Phone NO.: -
Sivnature: Date:
B) Land anolication Site (NVLP)
Check the appropriafe box ..
The cropoins srstern is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
...1 Conditional approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting: the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (monthldavivear): the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteudl'ezation plan.
ZI also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping systern as specified in the plan can not be established on newly c?eared land within 30 days
OC this certification. the owner:has committe to establish an interim crop for erosion control:
t
P,&(,, rr
Name of Technical Specialist (please Print):I �'� C
Affiliation G Date Work Comole:ed:
ZZ'
Address {,V cy): - Q/ G Phone No.: Q -63 dy
Signature:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
1 (eve) certify that i (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan.
and if aooropriaw to establish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit to DEMI a verification of completion
4
from a Technical Specialist within l5 calendar ays following die date specified in the condidunal certification. 'I (we)
realize that failure: to submit this Ve iuuation is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: _ _ Date:
dame of Manager (if differ4at from owner):
Signature: Date-
AWC -- Autiust 1. 199

. •r
C) Runoff Controls from Exterjor Lots (RC)
Fact hty «'ith d-(terlor lots
Nleliluds to minimize Lie run oft of pollutants irUm lounging and llenvy use ,L=eas h lt"; ,7vea inst,'lll��'as ipecitlea
in the olart.
For fac:licies without exterior lots, no cerrification is necessar_:.
Name of TeelWni al Specialist (Please Print): }2�_ 1�`Z �)C'_1= �1 , i7E 2
:affiliation
Date Wor.< Comcie:ed:
:address (Aae�,cy): 17-17,7-C / thane No.:720 � 716Qy
Signature: Date:
D) At}oHcacion and Handling Eguior_nent Installation (W>;..•P or I)
t../te.' rhe4ropriare bicc,c
.nimal waste acoiicmion 'and handlin2 eouipme.^,t :;pec:tic l in Lh.- Tian is c:: site and rent:: for use:
calibration and--djustmetht materials have hee=l provided w the owners and are contained ;hs Part of elle plan.
Aninhal wasie aepiication and handlin,! ettui0n1Cnt 3DCCi(1Cd in illw plan .ius not '%en insmllcd but Lhe Wvner
has proposed leasing or third par -Ly application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with Uit: require=ments of the plan: required buffers can be ntaintaincth calibration and
atiiusmient zuidanca have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of rhe pian.
J Conditional approval: .-Waial waste application and hand!ing equipment speciiied.in tie plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/dzy/year1: Cher; is adequate
stora.g_ to hold the waste until the equipme:it is installed and until the wast: can be land aoplied in
accordance with the cr000tng system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjusmheni guidance have
been provided to the owners and are conq�Qe4 as part of the plan.
Name of Tnical Specialist (Please Print): L "� �r-oS c,
affiliation,7d,.,)a,_6_- Date Wore Compieted:
Address (. zcy
Si2nacure:
Phone No.. & i�77-4&4f
0 �l/'21
�6 Date: 3-��^
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to ourchase the animal waste apolicadon and handling -,juipmenE as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DENT a ve;iiicadon of delive and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the data specified in the conditional cc-mficaUcrh. I
(wet realize tthut failure to submit this ve iflic'adcri is a violation of the waste mana2,2ment plan and will sublet: me
(us.) to an en orcement action tom DELI.
\arae of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Marne of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortolity Nlanagernent (SD. SI. WUP..RC or 1)
kizchods to control odors -and insects as sceciried in the Plan have been installed and are ooera: onal. Tne
rnorcality management system as saeci:led in the Play} lyas also been instailed and is operational.
Name of Tfinical Specialist (Pie_ue Print):
AfCLiiation Z,,.ln r. <tjc
Address (. _e. cy):
Signaiure:
AWC -- Auqust 1. 1997
Wore Comnle:ed:
fflkhone X0.: 7D
Date:

A
� T
ATTACHMENT A
nage t
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer c County_
Address -0,risks?find of Operation
2rl1�{-7 iN
Type of Waste Facility c
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capaciy . When the waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilize= required For the craps on:the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. 'waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
envi_..znmentaliy safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
soil :vies are imaor =ant as: they .have different Ofiltra:.ion
rates and leaching botentaV Waste shall not be applied no
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or an land when the surface is
f=czen, __the= of these conditions may result '_:i runoff to .
surface raters.. Wind conditions should also he considered no
avoid :rift and 3ownwind odor problems. To maximize the. -value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing c=op or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
-nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the :caste analysis
report from your waste panagement facility.
The design of _your waste management facility is based on the
following:
Amount of '.paste Produced Per Year:
3yr
15b ani:rials x_ Lj waste / animal/yr = CDU • fatal waste
produced.

•e ,
?age
Amount of Nitrogen ?rbduc_ed ?er Year:
animals x lbs N/animal/yr = -=tai '+
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate ecuipaent :.o apply the waste Ln
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for days cf
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped ever
months.
The following acreage for waste application will be Needed
based on the crop to be grown and surface application:
Field Sail Croo RealistiC Ltx. Y Acrew L'.x . W Monts of
Type Yield Per AC. Utilized ACplicstion
I ! } ! I I
TOTAL I
Mwwt of M Promced ! I
Surplus or Deficit l
Call the Soil and Water Conservation oist_ic:. office after you
receive waste analysis'_eporm to obtain the amount per acre tc
apply and the irrigation application _ate prior to applying
waste.
Prepared tv
Concurred it
(Cavy to oroaucer and copy to case file)
I' ;Cf Any 3 -Ar �
'role Date
-
'Zo ?e
Date

=-WASTE-UTILIZATION L­AN.v_,
Amount o_ Waste Prcduced Per Year(gallons, ft -7, ..ams, etc. )
s s
] IM an ..ma? S X 5,329 ( . } wa5ts/zni.�zi IV_ a_, - 794.399 (�• )
Amount of ?-ant Available N;t,oae.^_ IPANI ?recuc9A pen- v --=-
15n an_mai s X 76 ibs . PAN./anima?/yea= 11,400 i=s . /Yea_.
(PAN c=cm N. C. Tech. Guide St-. 633)
A^nlv_nc the above a cunt olff was is is a hi'a jcb . You shoed cz n
time and have zcaronriat- e_= =men - 'Co acci y -k-He wast_ in a t -*ne; v
manner. - - - - -

aN= WAS= 202=22EMM PLAIN CZRTIPZCATXQN FOR z IST-T�.,iG F= LCTS
Please raturn the ec=pleted form to the Division of savironmaatal 2i=zgement at
the addrasa on the reverse side of this fozm.
Nasse of farm (Please =rirt) :
Mailing Address: 8350 Sher:
Piedmont Research Station
ury
Phone No.: 7Q4 -?Z8 -?62A
County (of fax:.:)
Fart location: :,atizude and Lorgitude:M': 30' /&-!ZZaa!' (required) zisc,
please attach a cony of a county road :[tan with )Qc_at_on identiLied.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.) AiZ�
Cesign capacity (number of animals) /.Sa
Average sire of onerac-4on (12 month popular' -on avg.) : 135- IAC
Average acreage needed ror land application or waste (acres)
aaaaa3aaoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaa3aaaaaaaaaaaoasxaaaaaaaavaaaaaaaaaa
Tac!=ical Specialist Cartification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15x1 NCAC 6r .0005; I certify =hat the
existing animal waste management system for the fans named above has an anima,
waste management pian that meets the operation and :maintenance standards and
specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil
Conse=-nation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conser-ratior.
Commission pursuant to IBA NCAC 211.0217 and 15A NCAC 6r .0001-.0005. The
following elements and their corresponding minimum criteria have been verified
by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the pian as
aomlicable: minimum separations (buffers); ade�uata quantity and amount of ?and
for waste utilization (or use of third party); access or ownership or proper
waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application
rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from
storuwater runoff events less severe than the 25 -yeas, 24 --hour storm.
Name of Technical Specialist (Plese
affiliation (Agency) : USDA - N C
7_7Z --C 01 G Co�1Go2 b r� a
Address • SA�I E .
: ._ tmocrna IDES -
Phone No .(7OA9� (n 3_ -1 toC4
Signature:'f .A4, i1.C�°-- K-1✓ � Date: /Z-/A-jS
aaQaaosaaaaaasasaaaasaasaaaaaaaasaraasaaaaasaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Owner/Hanager Agraemeat
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any. expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will
require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state either directly through a man-made conveyance or through runoff from a
storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will
be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation
District.
Mama of Land Owner (Please Print): N•- C. Department of Agriculture
Signature: Date: 12/15/95
Rama of Yanavez•, if i f t from owner (Please print) : Raymond D. Coltrain
Signature: Date: 12/15/95
Nota: Age_in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY: ACE#

Not
Piedmont Research Station
3350 Sherrills Ford Road
r
Salisbury, North Carolina 23147
1s
�; aentl I ` J C32
�.t
�t i} C37 � C37 Lia t
7.A
lob ,cti.
41 , m �t611 "All
e r3 ki, G1 t;S �i�L 1 L` , __• M Ce 71 .._,1> ` �
_ - 1 `" • ! /
1 ,$Ot;
:o.`�r 13..
w; • —v 4 y (f1 � r �.
•/1 , 931 Bt
hi X33. 6.7
1 � If �• f
37
f
912
92 � ...
t `
930 - I ,

PRODUCERS NAME Piedmont Reseamh Station
e !�
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP REALISTIC YIELD Lbs.N per Ac. ACRES Lbs. N Utilized
1810 D4
DOA
Hiwassee
HWassee
Fescue / Pasture 5 Tons / ac, r
Fescue I Pastu 5 Torts / as
250
250
.+.0.26
-4-
-8$- ►s
1;125 '`* Y r
DOB
Htwassee
Alfalfa vr"�"
8 Tons / ac.
120 �z4a
8 �5
72 °
5
136C
Hiwassee
Small Grainlevro -
8 Tons / ac.
130{ 2,10
i�t7s 7
#s�79 87'.
DOC
Htwassee
Lespedeza
4 Tons / ac.
W1240
-;Rw 5-10
-s24
D7
Dogue
Bermuda Pasture
a Tons lac.
300
+-9-1,45-
42& -7S
D7
Dogue
Rye 1 Pasture
O Tons / ac.
300
DO'.
H1wassee
Com Silage,
20 Tons I ac.
240'
13$• °
4~660
De
HWassee
Small Grain
8 Tons / ac.
130
$2.0-99,0
+AW 1040
De
Htwassee
Soy Beans
40bu.lac.
•480
4e.tr8,0
1;839/x130
D10
Riverview -
Com Silage
20 Tarts / ec.
240
-34-a-/6,4"
!o, ?
-5;492' 4800
Hit z•4v7S
D11
Dogue
Bermuda Pasture
Rye
8 Tons /ac.
Tons
300
44.4-
24o'T•,>•
D11
Dogue
1 Pasture
Rye 1
O / ac.
a ! ac.
300
44,240-7
f
,�48g
4.•98 Y6,07, -Jr
4%
D1 2A
Hiwassae
Pasture
Tons
300
4.
D128
Hlwassee
Matua / Pasture
5 Tons / ac.
250
&0-!0
2086-
All of the solid waste is sold to a third party ( see Third Party Agreement form) TOTAL 80
and removed from the farm. Amount of N produoed
Deficit of N
` Based on Waste Analysis Report with N at 2.4 lbs, per 1,000 gallons Irrigated
2,916 Ms. of N
23,802 Ms. of N
On fields where com silage is planted apply 240 lbs. of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where small grain is planted apply 130 lbs. of N / aa, no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where rye Is planted apply 300 lbs. of N / ac, no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where soybeans Is planted apply 160 lbs. of N 1 ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where fescue is grown apply 250 lbs. of N / ac. H field Is used for hey and 110 lbs. of N / ac. if is used for pasture.
On fields where bermuda Is grown apply 300. lbs. of N ! ao., no more than 30 days bekre planting.
On fields where matua grass is grown apply 250 lbs. of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where alfalfa Is grown apply 120 lbs, of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
On fields where lespedeze Is grown 80 lbs. of N I ac., no more than 30 days before planting.
Waste applications should be made in the following months for each crop.
0
Com
- March - July
Small Grain
-September - November
Soybeans
- April- June
Fescue -
-March - June / August - November
Bermuda
-April - October-
Matua .
- April - October
,
i
i r
i
• r
F�[ds 14AI-A

-w
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or Iand
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal
discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste.
If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall
provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Plan when there is a change in .the operation, increase in the- number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where
runoff leaves the field: These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by
DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian
Forest Buffers.]
5: Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATION
(Continued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no
more than 24 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filler Strips]
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 240 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on -grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
6
to

WASTE UTILIZ.STION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(Continued)
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18.A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). if needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.

lot, �' -.,
GI
rl
Pell
71#( J-�
Aw
14 -

NERQiEMN ACTION PLA'
PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY ( DWO )
704 -663- 1699
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES ( EMS )
704-G3);-0911
ROWAN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DIS'T'RICT
( SWCD )
704 - 637 - 0783
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS )
704 -637 - 1604
ROWAN COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE ( CES )
704-633-0571
This plan will be implemented in the event that waste from your operation is
leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until waste
reaches surface waters of leave your property to consider that you have a
problem.. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen.
This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.

a
`4
Stop the release of waste. Depending on the situation, this may or may
not' be possible_ Suggested responses to some possible problems are
listed below.
A. Lagoon / Waste Storage Pond overflow - possible solutions are:
a. Make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon ! waste
storage pond.
b. Stop all flows into the lagoon 1 waste storage pond
immediately.
C. Pump waste to fields at an acceptable rate.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Add temporary soil berm to increase elevation of dam.
B. Runoff' from waste application held - actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
C. Create a temporary diversion to contain the runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the
runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff
occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and spruiklers - action include:
a. Stop the irrigation pump.
b. Stop the recycle pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate f irther discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

:f.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators - action
include:
a. Stop the irrigation pump.
b. Stop the recycle pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all floes in the house, flush system, or solid
separators_
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon / waste storage pond.
Often this is seepage as opposed to flouring leaks - possible
action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to
catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump
back to lagoon/ waste storage pond.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove
animals and fill holes and compact 'With a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side
walls and lagoon /,waste storage pond bottom as soon as
possible.
?. assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
A. Did the runoff` reach any surface waters?
B. Approximately how much was released and for what duration'?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or
property damage?
D. Did the spill leave -the property?
E. Does the spill have the potential to reach any surface waters`?
F. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach any surface
waters?
G. .Are potable water wells in danger ( either on or off of the
property)
H. How much reached surface waters?

.■
lb
3. riate agencies.
Contact approp
A. During normal business hours, call your Division of Water
Quality regional office: Picone 704 - 663 - 1699. After hours,
emergency number: 919 - 733 - 3942. Your phone call should
include: your name, facilivy name, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item ? above. the exact location of the
facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weatherand wind conditions. The corrective measures that have
been taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
B. If the spill leaves your property or enters surface waters, call the
local EMS phone number 704 - 638 - 0911.
C. Instruct EMS to contact the local Health Department.
D. Contact the Rowan SWCD at 04 - 6'37 - 0783 , the
NRCS at 704 - 637 - 1604, or the CES at 704 - 633 - 0571
for ad,,lce / technicaI assistance.
4. if none of the above numbers work, call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask that person to
contact the proper agencies for you.
Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of the problem to
minimize off - site damage.
A. L. P. Barger Jr. Grading 704 - 633 - 8693
B. Parks Hubbard Grading 704 - 278 - 4876
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon / waste storage
pond ( NRCS, SWCD, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
Name: z -D xwc D
Phone: 264 --
Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance to
rectifif the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste
management plan to keep problems with release of waste from
happening again.

Insect Control Checklist For Animal Operations
Source –�-- Cause 1i[1.11's III Co ill -ill Insects T Sile Sllecilic 1'racliccs--
Liquid Syslelms --
Hosh Golfers Accmm olatioll of solids _ I hlsh sysicnl Is designed ;Intl nllcraled
stlflleielllly 10 rclllnvc accoml►l.Iled solids floral
luitcl s as designed.
-R"'Itenurve hI idging of acculnlllaled Solids .11
dlschalge
LagtlollS and Ills • [:Misted Solids _ Mallilain lagoons, Stilling basins rind Mils %VIICIC
Ilcsl hrecding is apparcnl ill millinlvc IIIc
cllist iog of solids to a depill or nu mole 111.111 (1 -
A inches ovcr more than 30*/a of striate.
Excessive vcgctalive • Decrlyillg vcgelatioll _ Maintain vegelative control along hanks of
Glowih Iagnous and other impoundnleals to Ilrcvcnl -
.1cc0mlulali0ll of decaying vegehlive Illallcr
along %valer's edge on inll)onn(lnlcnl*S pee honer.
Feeders 0 Decd Spillage
Feed storage 0 Accumellalions of feed resit
i AM lovemhcr 11. 10116, I'agc I
Dry sysiellls
I)csign, opera1c,7nd maintain recd sysicmis
hunkers and troughs) to nlinia►ize Ills
acconullrltioll of decaying W-ISIagc.
�, Cleall Ill) 51)i1l.1gC on a rriutine hasis (c.g., 7-.- 11)
day inlelval doling'. Sommer; 15-311 day interval
during tivilltcr).
Ilcdmcc nloisllrrc accmnuIll iou rvilhin and
around imm►ctliatc perin)cicr of feed sloragc
areas by insuring drainage away from) site
and/or providing adcgnale colliaillurcnl (c.l!.,
coveled hill fur hlewel's glair and similar Iligh
Joloistole glair luolhlcls}.
.4'f lnsl)ccl for and iem)nvc or break III) ACCLIII1l11i11CCI
solids ill filler strips around Iced slulage as
needed.:

Suorce [:-Ilse 111111's Iq Cunlral lasects Site Specific Practices
Animal Ifolding Acas Accumulations tahmimal wastes liliminalc low arras flint trap uluist-lc'11u11f;
1111d feed waslagc knees lend other lucaliuus where waste
aCC111111►1:11CS and dislttlbance by allilllals is
' 1►11[Illllill.
0"Iviniumin Icttce ru+vs and filter strips around
animal holding :l►cas to minimize
accunau6ttiulis of wastes (i.C., inspect for and
` Iemuvc ur btcak up accuntttlalcd solids as
_ llceded).
Dry N -1: -lute I landling Accunudatiuns ulatlilnal wastes _,P"�RC1110vc sl►illage un a routine basis (e.g., 7 - IU
Systems da)' interval tfuriug summer; 15-30 day i-tcrval
during winter) wheic mamn-c is loaded I'm lawl
application ur disposal.
'E�111ovidc for adcalualc drainage ;wound manure
stockpiles.
'Ispccl liar atul remove or'btcak up accutmllaled
wastes in filler ships around stockpiles and
maimc handling areas as needed. -
Fur twine ulluluration cuntacl the cooltcl,Uive lixterlsiull Sclvice, Deimttmenl uf'l=rltolliolugy, Box 7613, Nullh CGilrulina Stale Uitiversily,
Raleigh, NC:, 27695-7613.
AN -11C - November 11. 1996, Page 2

Daily Farm Waste Management- Odor Control Checklist
j SO 11 Fee
t..allse
11511's to Millinli%C Udol- silt! specilit' Practices
l'a1111151Cad
•
kllly pit duclioll
Oer Vegeta llvc or wooded buII'm
x0"Recu 1111 emled best I11anageniv ll IIl acllces
Good judg111eld a lld Culllflloll scllse
Paved lull or Ilafil alie
•
Wet Illalitll-C-CUVCICt1 51111:1CCs
scla pe.ol• Ilush daily
sill faces
eEr"I'lulnole shying wills ploper vellldaduli
"Ruillillu Chccks mid II1aintemmeC (n1 waleicis,
i1y(11 augs, pipes, slack la nks
Ilcddcd ancas
•T
UI ire —
4 I'lunlulc drying Willi ploper vcnlilaliolt
•
Pallini 1niclobial ticcol llositioll
Replace+vC1 UI. 111:111111'C-CUVCIC(I beddiog
Maniule (ll'}' slacks
•
1'alll:ll MiCIubGll (ICCU11111115illUll
'!'ic1v1(Ic liquid Ell allla ge fur Motel[ mallulc --- —
Storage tank or basin
0
Pallial nllctobi tl decomposltlun ;
n 114wttolll OI' nlid-levcl loadilig
Sill Ia1CC
•
Mixill-I while filling ;
0 Tilllk Cums
•
Agil:ltioll Wilell C1111}t}'illg
n misin sit, racc Mats or5UEitis; -
EOr Enroll] 101 IM10if and ll(pdd additnnl5
Agilale o111y Illi(]l• 10 oU111111C ICRIUVA
n Ili ovc i biulugical additives ur uxidanls
Scttlillu basin sill I:JCCS
I'atIial nIicrulliai ducunlposit iorl
Liquid Ella inagc Built Settled solids
•
Mixillf.; while tilling
eRr Renluve solids regulallly
.•
Ag11al1Un ++'hell eniptyiiig
'Maome, sluiry or sludge
•
Ag'11adkin when Slucalding
❑ SUII iiii llt111 orsimryl'silitiges
5plCader (11111CIS
.\'111alilC
gas Cllli551ti115
.0"Wash lesldual mmure lion) spreader i11ler use
C3 Proven biological addilivcs or oxidants
� UllcovcI'Cd IIIan111C,
•
Vol;llile bas CI11lss1Ulls +Vlllle
Cl Soil injeclion of slully/sludges
'slurry M- sludge vn liCI(I
drying
n Soil incorpuralioll within ,is tlrs
sull;Iccs
Cl Spread in thin unifumt layers for spill dryiuh
n I'rovCn biological addilivcs nr ositi:ults
—
;Mush links
Agilatiun of Iccycled lagoon
p Flush lank coders;
liquid while tanks arc filling �k3**_l,xlcnd fill lines to near bullulu of larks wish
allli-sipholl vcnls
Utllsidc ch-nin Coliculitio • Agilatiou doting waslcivaler ❑ Box covcls
or juncli(ni boxes culiveyance
' AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page I

Source _Cause Ili11I's lU n�llllllll7.0 Udlll' $ltC �11L'l'IIIC Irl i1CIICl'S
Lift stations • Agitation (luring; sun11) Inuk ❑ Stoup Lang[ covers .
lilling and drawdown
I111[I l)f [Ililll11111)CS at • Agitation during ►vilSlOY MM' ❑ lixicnd discllnrgc point of pipes [ln[lernc;lth
lagoon culivc)ance lagoon liquid level
LagOUll SIIrt;ICCs
• Volatile gas clili5snln;
Ingoon liquid Capacity;
i
• Diologic;1I mixing;
Al" Cut red 1:1gooll slal'till) Inucedules.,
'lal'ihties • Miclolllal decomposition of
- Agilatimi
Millilrtun) surface arca-lo-vulurltc raliu;
organic Itumer
hliuinuun agitation tvllcn pumping;
Mud Imcked unto public- • Poutly mailllailled access wads
Fni ill access fold maintenance
��11•leGhalllCal ;1CG111U11;
r[)ad4 110111 l;ll In ;1CCC55
❑ Piumi biological addilives
liiigaliun sprinkler
•. high plcssme agitation;
/gam Irl igatc uu dry days with giggle or uu ►vied;
I1o7.7_ICs
I
• Wild (It ill
�N'*�Mininunn rcconuncndcd operating luuccdulc;
-Cattle Matins Managemcul ; 02UO flute/i3M1r Picket
ALJ-I'uull) intake near lagoon liquid surface;
Dairy Edticalionai Unit fvMauuic Management Syslem - Lake Wheeler
Iluad Field Labomloty ; EDAIs 209-95
AB"I'Milli 11110111 SCCUnd-slags lagoon;
Lagoon Design ;Ind Managrumit Cur Livestuck Mmitua'1-realment and Sluiage ; EBAIi 103-83
NCSU - BAIs
Cl Flush lesidual Iu;uuuc lium pipes. at eud of
NCSU - BAH
slulrylsi[idge pumpings
Dead allimals • Cal Cass decomposition
-..Fr huller disposition oCCnlcasses
—St;tndil1g % alel mumid • Iulploper (Imillage;
Glade -and landscape Stich that water (pains
'lal'ihties • Miclolllal decomposition of
away fiEl l 18clllties
organic Itumer
Mud Imcked unto public- • Poutly mailllailled access wads
Fni ill access fold maintenance
r[)ad4 110111 l;ll In ;1CCC55
' Additional hlfuunaliun :.
Available hung
-Cattle Matins Managemcul ; 02UO flute/i3M1r Picket
NCSU, County Extcusion Center
Dairy Edticalionai Unit fvMauuic Management Syslem - Lake Wheeler
Iluad Field Labomloty ; EDAIs 209-95
NCSU - BAIs
Lagoon Design ;Ind Managrumit Cur Livestuck Mmitua'1-realment and Sluiage ; EBAIi 103-83
NCSU - BAIs
Management of Dairy 1Mnstc►valer ; FHA1: 106-83
NCSU - BAH
.Calibration of Mamie and Wa5lewaler Application E[ltiipment ;
FBA13 Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAG
Nuisaiice Cmice n5 ill Animal Maimir MaiiagemCal: Oduls wid
I -lies ; PROW, 1995 Conlcicnce I'loccedmgs
Flurida C00puntive 1:J;ICIIsion
e
ANIC" 'uvember 11, 1996, fags 2

Mortality Management Methods
(check which methodr ;) etre beim, implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the Jround within 2-1. hours after
knowledve of the death. The buriai must be at least 300 tett from any tiowint_*
stream or public body of -water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under 0. S. 106-L6S.-
Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Aaricuiture
.env method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
De�:trnber IS. (996

"es6arch Farm Dairy .'.
•,l
Dairy Waste Storage Structure
Rowan, NC
Design Criteria:
150 Dairy cows at 1.400 lbs. each = 210.000 lbs. live weight
180 days storage
5 gal./day/cow of waste water
40.000 sq, ft. of non -pond .Drainage Area
Waste from Freestall area and access alleys will be scraped and stored
in the waste storage pond. Waste water from the milk barn will also be
stored in the waste storage pond, as well as the runoff from
approximately 40,000 sq. ft. of the bams and lot.
I. Storage Volume Required
A. Manure Storage
150 cows X 14,6 gal./day/cow X
180 days
-------- ----- 52.701 cu, ft.
7,48 gals./cu.ft.
B. Waste water from Milk Barn
150 cows X 5 gal./day/cow X
180 days
--
---- 18.048 cu. ft.
7,48 gals./day/cow
C. Normal Runoff from Open Areas for ;180 days
Drainage Areas = 40,000 sq, ft.
1 day CN 98130 day CN 92
Months Rainfall (inches) .
Runoff (inches)
March 4,61
3,71
April 3,38
2,53
May 3,66
2,79
June 4,20
3,31
July 4,61
3,71
August 3,97
3,09
24,43
19,14
19,14 runoff inches X 40.000 sq. ft.
63.800 cu. ft.
12 inches 1 ft.
D. Waste Feed and Bedding
20 cu. ft. / day X 180 days= 3.600 cu. ft.
TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED 138.149 cu. ft.

- Add to.. ,.jid Volume -
II. Normal Rainfall less evaporation on Structures for 180 days
March - August rainfall -- 24,4 inches
Annual evaporation 39 inches X 0.5 yr. 19,5 inches
Excess = 4,93 inches =
III. 25 yr. storm on Open Area of 40.000 sq. ft.
CN = 95 for open areas
With 25 yr. 1 day strom of 6.0 inches, runoff = 5.41 inches
40.000 sq. ft. X 5,41 inches runoff
12 inches
18.033 cu.ft.
25.984 sq. ft. surface area of storage pond
IV. 25 yr. storm on Pond Surface
25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 inches -
V. Emergency Spillway
25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 inches
Peak discharge = 3.2 cfs.
Use ESW with 12 ft. bottom width,
3 to 1 side slopes, 0.2 ft. stage =
Vt. Freeboard -
VtL Total Depth of Pond 8 feet of storage -
0,5 ft.
18.033 cu. ft.
0,7 ft.
0,5 ft.
0,2 ft.
1,0 ft.
10,89 ft.

depth area of the bottom area of the top
200 x 80 + 232 X 112 +
X 16.000 + 25.984 +
1,3 124.928
0
area of the mid-section
4 X 216 X 96 =
82.944 = 162.406 designed amount
156-182 amount needed
6.224 amount surplus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
L__. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN f
PROJECT/FARM: rch Station
• A 4" X 4" treated post, painted white or a 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation . At no time should
the effluent level rise above the maximum liquid level, which is feet level
below the settled top of dam.
A visual inspection of the waste storage pond will be performed at least twice a year.
The inspector should check the condition of the dam and the emergency spillway.
The inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the back
slope and at the toe of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to
check for signs of damage due to varmint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.) burrows. A
visual inspection should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the
structure is not experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be
brought to the attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
The waste storage pond will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded areas shall be
repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground cover shall be
reseeded to provide a vegetative cover sufficient restrain erosion. The dam and all
constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 500 pounds of 10-10-10 per
acre or its equivalent.
Maintain all waste handling equipment—pumping, loading, hauling, spreading, etc.—
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
■ All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization
plan. The waste storage pond will be emptied at the end of each design storage period
( � days or 6 months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the
effluent.

P & L BARK5 INC.
Pag.lanp
^ MANUFACTURERS OF QUALITY GROUND COVERINGS
AND SOIL PRODUCTS
ROUTE 4, Box 281-A [phone]
PAGELAND. SOUTH CAROLINA 29728 FAX [phone]
March 20, 1998
In Reference To: Piedmont Research Stations Division
To Whom It May Concern:
P & L Baric, Inc. Of Pageland, South Carolina purchases the dairy solids, cow manure,
from Mr. Raymond D. Coltrain for the purpose of making our soil mixtures.
If we can be of further assistance please contact us at 803-672-5553.
Sincerely Yours,
Dennis M Plyler
President
DMP/jt

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NC Dept of Agriculture
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd
Salisbury NC 28144
Attn: Raymond Coltrain
Dear Raymond Coltrain:
r iIT
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENviRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 24, 1999
Subject: Application No. AWC800001
Additional Information Request
Piedmont Research Station
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the
following by October 24, 1999:
1. All Waste Utilization Plans (WUP) developed after October 1996 must include irrigation
parameters (application rates). Please have your technical specialist include irrigation
parameters into your WUP or provide an irrigation design that shows irrigation
parameters.
2. When utilizing soybeans in a crop rotation, residual nitrogen should be accounted for in
the next crop. It appears that the nitrogen residual from soybeans is not accounted for in
the Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) submitted. Please contact your technical specialist to
review your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) and revise the WUP to account for residual
nitrogen from soybeans, if necessary.
3. Your Waste Utilization PIan (WUP) list the Yield for Bermuda Pasture on Tract 1610,
fields D7 and D1 I as 6 tons per acre. This is higher than information available to the
Division of Water Quality recommends. Please contact your technical specialist to
review the Waste Utilization Plan and provide documentation that supports the yield as
shown in the current WUP or revise the WUP to reflect current guidance. Please note
that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist.
1617 Mail service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 80-0001
Page 2
4. Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) list the Yield for Rye overseed as 6 tons per acre.
The Sixth Guidance Memorandum to Technical Specialists dated August 18, 1997 states
that only 50 pounds of nitrogen per acre should be applied to small grain overseeded into
Bermuda grass. Current guidance allows for 100 pounds of nitrogen per acre under strict
management practices as mentioned in the memo included with this letter. Please have
your technical specialist reduce the nitrogen rate on the winter annuals to 50 pounds per
acres or incorporate the attached management practices into the narrative of the WUP for
the application of 110 pounds of nitrogen per acre.
PIease note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before October 24,
1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H
.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation'of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit
is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
j
ue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality '-
---James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
January 10, 2000
NC Dept of Agriculture
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd
Salisbury NC 28144
Attn: Raymond Coltrain
67,?W,A
IT 0 0
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWC800001
Additional Information Request
Piedmont Research Station
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
Dear Raymond. Coltrain:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by February 9, 2000:
Your revised Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) still lists the Yield for Bermuda Pasture on Tract 1610 as 6 tons
per acre. This is higher than information available to the Division of Water Quality suggests. Please
contact your technical specialist to review the Waste Utilization Plan and provide documentation that
supports the yield as shown in the current WUP or revise the WUP. Please note that all WUP revisions
must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Your revised Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) still lists the Yield for Rye/Pasture on Tract 1610 field 12A as 6
tons per acre. This is higher than information available to the Division of Water Quality suggests. Please
contact your technical specialist to review the Waste Utilization Plan and provide documentation that
supports the yield as shown _in_the current WUP or revise the WUP. Please note that all WUP revisions
must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and driied by both the owner and the technical specialist. - Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before February 9, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
erely,
ue Homewo
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division, of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NC Dept of Agriculture
Piedmont Research Station
8350 Sherrills Ford Rd
Salisbury NC 28144
Attn: Raymond Coltrain
Dear Raymond Coltrain:
IT 1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENvkRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 1, 2000
Subject: Application No. AWC800001
Additional Information Request
Piedmont Research Station
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by July 1, 2000:
Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) list the Yield for Rye overseed as 4 tons per acre. The Sixth Guidance
Memorandum to Technical Specialists dated August 18, 1997 states that only 50 pounds of nitrogen per acre
should be applied to small grain overseeded into Bermuda grass. Current guidance allows for 100 pounds of
nitrogen per acre under strict management practices as mentioned in the memo included with this letter.
Please have your technical specialist reduce the nitrogen rate on the winter annuals to 50 pounds per acres
or incorporate the attached management practices into the narrative of the WUP for the application of 110
pounds of nitrogen per acre.
It also appears that there may be some calculation errors in the Table. Please double check the Lbs. N
Utilized column and correct any entries as necessary.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated'by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below.- The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before July 1, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Si rely, 5
e "Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone]B3 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

RWG ?D o49a/
RECEIVED 1 DENR 1 DWQ
Aquifer Protection Sedion
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste UtilizatiohUG 17 2009
07-29-2009 meo
This plan has been prepared for: I This plan has been developed by:
Piedmont Research Station ` Chris Sloop
NC Piedmont Research Station I Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
8.350 Sherrils Ford Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
[phone]
I�Z2ZC Old Concord Road
Salisbury, NC 28144-8305
[phone]
PA A-- R, Qt -,Mn
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management,with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
r
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: - s1 145
clinical Specialist Signature Date
574674
.......................... ..
Database Version 3.1
Date Printed:

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S1
Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid waste generated 2,550.00 tons/year by a 150 animal Dairy
(Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
3320
Incorporated
5156
0-%5
5580
Irrigated
3532
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
—Incorporated
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
3,532
16611
Injected
6,580,357
NIA
Year 2
3,532
Irrigated
-16,710
NIA
-6,619,729
Year 3
3,532
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Year 4
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1
14,535
0
14,535
0.00
2,550.00
Year 2
14,535
0
14,535
0.00
2,550.00
Year 3
14,535
0
14,535
0.00
2,550.00
Year 4
14,535
0
14,535
0.00
2,550.00
S3
Dairy (Milk Cow) Lagoon Liquid waste generated 1,399,050 gals/year by a 150 animal
Dairy (Milk Cow) Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
3320
Incorporated
5156
Injected
5580
Irrigated
3532
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
3,532
16611
-13,079
6,580,357
-5,181,307
Year 2
3,532
20242
-16,710
8,018,779
-6,619,729
Year 3
3,532
6632
-3,100
2,627,278
-1,228,228
Year 4
3,532
19619
-16,087
7,771,907
-6,372,857
--------------------------------------------------.....---------.-..-......------------------......_-.-.-........--------------------...--------....
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-06-2009 Source Page Page I of

Narrative
This Nutrient Managemant Plan was prepared to update the previous plan and to incorporate the solids
being produced on the farm that had previously been sold and utilized off of the farm. No increase of
animal numbers or kind has occured from the previous plan. This Nutrient Management Plan was
prepared in order to utilize the lagoon liquid produced by 150 Dairy cows on the Piedmont Research
Station Farm as well as the solids produced by the same animals. All fields with the prefix "D" included
in the plan (Examples: Dl, D8) are certified wettable acres and will be used for the application of the
[ 7Ids- ith " tt h Li[e j+m sC28) are certified
tt - - acreT--his time and-wi-ii-be-used-for-the-application-of-t-he-solid-waste—Some-additional-f olds
are included in the plan as possible application options but were not utilized at the time of writing this
plan because they were being used for experimental vegetable production. All fields with the "C" prefix
are nearby and available for land application when a storage structure cleanout is necessary.
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-06-2009 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
574674 Database Version 3 1 Date Printed 8/6/2009
PCS Page Page 1 of 2
]VOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
P205
Total
Useable
Plat
Removal
(lbs/acre)
Applied
(Ibslacre)
Tract
Field
Acres
Acres
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1610
D10
20.00
16,40
Unknown
NIA
Riverview -P
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
75
NIA
Small Grain Cover
N/A
0
NIA
•
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
75
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
49
N/A
Soybeans, Full Season
45 bu.
36
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
49
NIA
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
60
NIA
1610
D11
14.20
10.70
Unknown
N/A
Dogue-P
Corn, Silage
25.0 Tons
85
N/A
Small Grain Cover
NIA
0
NIA
Com, Silage
25.0 Tons
85
N/A
Small Grain, Silage
10.5 Tons
57
N/A
Soybeans, Full Season
50 bu.
40
N/A
Small Grain, Silage
10.5 Tons
57
N/A
S 7 Tnnc
79
:.x ..
N/A
-
1610
D6
24.00
23.00
Unknown
N/A
Hiwassee
Com, Silage
25.0 Tons
85
N/A
Small Grain Cover
NIA
0
NIA
Com, Silage
25.0 Tons
85
N/A
Small Grain, Silage
11.0 Tons
59
NIA
Soybeans, Full Season
50 bu.
40
N/A
Small Grain, Silage
11.0 Tons
59
NIA
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
5.7 Tons
79
N/A
1610....
_ __D7 _
.__ _1,90
1,90
Unknown.
-NIA.
Dogue-P.
Com,Silage. -
25.0Tons
85
N/A
Small Grain Cover
N/A
0
NIA
Com, Silage
25.0 Tons
85
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
10.5 Tons
57
WA
Soybeans, Full Season
50 bu.
40
N/A
Small Grain, Silage
10.5 Tons
57
N/A
574674 Database Version 3 1 Date Printed 8/6/2009
PCS Page Page 1 of 2
]VOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract Field
Total Useable
Acres Acres
plat
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal Applied
(lbsracre) (lbslacre)
>- 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
> 100
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
5.7 Tons
79 NIA
1610 1 DS
12.001 11.00
Unknown
NIA
Hiwassee
Corn, Silage
25.0 Tons
85 NIA
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
Small Grain Cover
N/A
0 NIA
Corn, Silage
25.0 Tons
85 N/A
5m_aIFG_rat—n,_5 t age
M Tons
59
Soybeans, Full Season
50 bu
40 NIA.
Small Grain, Silage
11.0 Tons
59 NIA
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
5.7 Tonsl
79 NIA
PLAN TOTALS: 72.10 63.00
L!' ..
Potential Leaching .'`
Technical Guidance
0-25
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
No adjustment needed; N based application
>- 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
> 100
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Starter P application only
<= ] 0
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> 10
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
PLAT Index
Rating
P Management Recommendation
0-25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25-50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
_. 51 - 100
1.ligli� `
Application limited to crop�P rem6v61
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 8/6/2009
PCS Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of a umber of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements an I proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount be ing supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimiite of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on eachfield in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table t ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Appiic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutnent
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Appli
Metho
NitrientA
p
lanitre
PA
Eied
bslA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1610
D10
S3
Riverview -P
20.00
16.40
Com, Silage
22.0 Ton
*2/15-1011
240
0
0
Irrigi
240
95.07
0.00
1,559.21
0.00
1610
D10
S3
Riverview -P
20.00
1640
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3131
25
0
0
Irrigj
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1610
D11
S3
Dogue-P
14.20
10.70
Corn, Silage
25.0 Ton
*2115-1011
272
0
0
Irrigi
272
107.75
0.00
1,152.93
0.00
1610
D11
S3
Dogue-P
14.20
10.70
Small Grain Ccver
NIA
-911-3131
25
0
0
irrigl
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1610
D6
S3
Hiwass"
24.00
23.00
Com, Silage
25.0 Ton
*2115-1011
272
0
0
irrigl
272
107.75
0.00
2,478.25
0.00
1610
D6
S3
Hiwassce
24.00
23.00
Small Grain Co'det
NIA
911-3131
25
0
0
Irrigi
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1610
D7
S3
Dogue-P
L90
1-90
Com, Silage
25.0 Ton
*2115-1011
272
0
0
Irrigl
1
272
107.75
0.00
204.73
0.00
1610
D7
S3
Dogue-P
1.90
1.90
Small Grain Cover
NIA
911-3131
25
0
0
Irrigi
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1610
D8
S3
Hiwassee
12.00
1 L00
Corn, Silage
25.0 Ton
*2115-1011
272
0
0
Irrig
272
107.75
0.00
1,1 R5.25
0.00
1610
DR
S3
Hiwassee
12.00
1 I.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Irrig
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
otal Applied- 1()00 gallons
6,580.36
z W
otal Produced, 1000 gallons
1,399.05
Balance, 1000 gallons
-5,181.31
Tota! Applied, tans
0.00
Total Produced. tons
<' , :__-
2,550.00
Balance, tons
.:
W .�,� __.a_��,.
2,550.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -symbol means leased, otherwise.. owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
574674 Database Version 3.1 gate Printed: 8/6/2009
WUT Page Page I of 4

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
11)
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(1bslA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Aryp ic
Metho
N
NwrientA
pp
(
lanure
PA
ied
bs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
I
N
1000
gal1A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1610
DIO
S3
Riverview -P
20.00
16.40
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3131
25
0
0
Irrig.
25
9.90
0.00
162.42
000
1610
DIO
S3
Riverview -P
20.00
16.40
Corn, Silage
22.0 Ton
*2/15-1011
240
0
25
Irrig.
215
85.17
0.00
1,396.79
0.00
1610
D10
S3
Riverview -P
20.00
16.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.81
O.00
324.83
0.00
1610
D11
S3
Dogue-P
14.20
10.70
Small Grain Coffer
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
0
Irrig.
25
9.90
0.00
105.97
0.00
1610
D11
S3
Dogue-P
14.20
10.70
Corn, Silage
25.0 Ton
*2/15-10/1
272
0
25
Irrig.
247
97.85
0.00
1,046.96
0.00
1610
DI 1
S3
Dogue-P
14.20
10.70
Small Grain, Silitge
10.5 Ton
911-3131
117
0
0
Irrig.
59
23. 171
0.00
247.96
0.00
1610
D6
S3
Hiwassee
24.00
23.00
Small Grain Cover
NIA
9/1-3131
25
0
0
Irrig.
25
9.90
0.00
227.78
0.00
1610
D6
S3
Hiwassee
24.00
23.00
Corn, Silage
25.0 Ton
*2115-10/1
272
0
25
Irrig
247
97.85
0.00
2,250.47
0.00
1610
D6
S3
Hiwassee
24.00
23.00
Small Grain, Silage
I I.0 Ton
911-3/31
122
0
0
Irrig
61
24At5
0.00
555.78
0.00
1610
D7
S3
Dogue-P
1.90
1.90
Small Grain Cover
N/A
911-3131
25
0
0
Irrig
25
9.90
0.00
18.82
0.00
1610
D7
S3
Dogue-P
1.90
1.90
Corn, Silage
25,0 `Fon
*2/15-1011
272
0
25
Irrig
247
97.85
0.001
18531
0.00
1610
D7
S3
Dogue-P
1.90
1.90
Small Grain, Silage
10.5 Ton
9/1-3131
117
0
0
Irrig
59
23.17
ROO
44-03
0.00
1610
D8
S3
Hiwassee
12.00
H.
Stnall Grain Coyer
NIA
911-3/31
25
0
0
Irrig
1
25
9. 90
0.00
108.94
0.0
1610
D8
S3
Hiwassee
12.00
11.00
Com, Silage
25.0 Ton
*2/15-10/1
272
0
25
Irrig
247
97.85
0.00
1,076.31
0,00
1610
D8
S3
Hiwassee
12.00
11.00
Small Grain, Silage
11.0 Ton
9/1-3131
122
0
0
Irrig
61
24.16
0.00
265.81
0.00
otalApplied, 1000gallons
8,0 18.78
_rIntal
Produced, 1000 gallons
1,399.05'
Balance, 1000 gallons
-6,619.73
y
Total Applied, tons
s = <:'
0.00
,
Total Produced, tons
2,550.00
Balance, tons
w ' `
2,550.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means ]eased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/6/2009
WUT Page Page 2 of 4

Waste Utilization Table
Year 3
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series ,
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs1A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Appli
Methori
NirtricntA
Manure
PA
lied
Qbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
.
N
1000
gallA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1610
D10
S3
Riverview -P
20,00
16.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
911-3131
E00
0
0
Irrig
50
19.81
0.00
324.83
0.00
1610
DIO
S3
Riverview -P
20.00
16.40
Soybeans, Full :Season
45 bu.
411-911.5
0
0
0
Irrigi
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1610
Dl()
S3
Riverview -l'
20.00
W40
Small Grain, Silage
9.0 Tons
911-3131
100
0
20
Irrig
40
15.85
0.00
259.87
0.00
1610
DI I
S3
Dogue-P
14.20
10.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.5 Ton
911-3/31
117
0
0
Irrig
59
23.17
0.00
24796
0.00
1610
D1 I
S3
Dogue-P
I4.2D
10.70
Soybeans, Full Season
50 bu.
411-9115
0
0
0
Trrig
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1610
D11
S3
Dogue-P
14.20
10.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.5 Ton
911-3131
117
0
20
[rrig
1
49
19.21
OM
205.58
0.00
1610
D6
S3
Hiwassee
24.00
23.00
Small Grain, Silage
11.0 Ton
9/1-3131
122
0
0
Irrig
61
24,16
0.00
555.78
0.00
1610
D6
S3
Hiwassee
24.00
23.00
Soybeans, Full .season
50 bu.
411-9115
0
0
0
brig
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
D,00
1610
D6
S3
IUwassee
24.00
23.00
Small Grain, Silage
I1.0Ton
911-3131
1.22
0
20
]Trig
51
20.20
0.00
464.67
0.00
1610
1 D7
S3
Dogue-P
1.90
1.90
Small Grain, Silage
10.5 Ton
911-3131
1.17
0
0
lrrigl
59
23,17
0.00
44.03
0.00
1610
D7
S3
Dogue-P
1.90
1.90
Soybeans, Fall ;-season
50 bu.
411-9115
0
0
0
lrrigl
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1610
D7
S3
Dogue-P
1.90
1.90
Small Grain, Silage
10.5 Ton
9/1-3131
117
0
20
Trrigl
49
19.21
0.00
36.501
0.00
1610
D8
S3
Hiwassee
12.00
11.00
Small Grain, Silage
11.0 Ton
911-3131
122
0
0
Irrigl
61
24.16
0.00
265.81
0.00
1610
D8
S3
Hiwassee
12.00
11.00
Soybeans, Full Season
50 bu.
4/1-9/15
0
0
0
0-00
0.00
0.00
0, OD
1610
DR
S3
Hiwassee
12.00
11.00
Small Grain, Silage
11.0 Ton
9/1-3131
122
0
20
f1rriggil-1501
20.20
0.00
222.23
0.00
otal Applied, 1000 gallons
2,627.28
otal Produced, 1000 gallons
1,399.05
ir=
Balance, 1000 gallons
-1,228.23
Total Applied tons
Total Produced, tons
Balance, tons
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, -owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/6/2009
WUF Page Page 3 of 4

Waste Utilization Table
Year 4
Tract
Field
Source
In
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(lbslA)
Comm.
Fert_
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Res.
(lbslA)
Appli
Metho
NatrientA
pplied
(
Manure
PA
bs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
ppiied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
.
J
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1610
D10
S3
Riverview -P
20.00
16.40
Small Grain, Sifrige
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
100
0
0
Irrig.
40
15.85
0.00
259.87
0.00
1610
D10
S3
Riverview -P
20.00
16.40
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3 Tons
3/15-8131
212
0
0
Irrig.
212
83.98
0.00
1,377.30
0.00
1610
DI 1
S3
Dogue-P
14.20
10.70
Small Grain. Silage
10.5 Ton
911-3131
117
0
0
Irrig.
49
19.21
0.00
205.58
0.00
1610
D1 I
S3
Dogue-P
14.20
10,70
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
5.7 Tons
3115-8131
282
0
0
Irrig.
282
111.71
0.00
1,195.31
0.0
1610
D6
S3
Hiwassee
24.00
23.00
Small Grain, Silage
11.0 Ton
911-3131
122
0
0
Irrig.
51
20.20
0.00
464.67
0.00
1610
D6
S3
Hiwassee
24.00
23.00
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
5.7 Tons
3/15-8/31
282
0
0
Irrig.
282
111.71
0.00
2,569361
0.00
1610
D7
S3
Dogue-P
1.90
1.90
Small Grain, Silage
10.5 Ton
911-3131
117
0
0
(trig
49
19.21
0.00
36.50
0.00
1610
D7
S3
Dogue-P
1.90
1.90
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
5.7 Tons
3/15-S/31
282
0
0
brig
282
111.71
0.00
212.25
0.00
1610
D8
S3
Hiwassee
12.00
11.00
Small Grain, Silage
11.0 Ton
911-3/31
122
0
0
Irrig�
51
20.20
0.00
222.23
0.00
1610
D8
S3
Hiwassee
12.00
11.00
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
5.7 Tons
3115-8131
282
0
0
Irrigj
282
111.711
0.00
1,228.83
0.00
otal Applied, 1000 gallons
7,771.91w-
tal Produced, 1000 gallons
1,399.05
µW
Balance, 1000 ealIons
-6,372.86
a
Total Applied, tans
kl,;=',
0.00
Total Produced, tans
2,550.00
Balance, tons;
t;
2,550.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, --- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data_
574674 Database Version 3.1 bate Printed: 8/6/2009 1 1 WUT Page Page 4 of 4

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
fact
1Secies
Appi ' etion-Rate
(inches/hour)
--4pp4c ati on Anount
(inches)
1610
D10
Riverview -P
0.50
1.0
1610
D11
Dogue-P
0.35
1.0
1610
D6
Hiwassee
0.30
1.0
1610
D7
Dogue-P
0.35
1.0
1610
D8
Hiwassee
0.30
1.0
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 8/6/2009 lAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. however, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop, Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management endations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbslA)
Mn
(lbs/A)
7n
(lbsIA)
Cu Lime
(lbs1A) (tons/A)
Tract Field
1610
DIO
Req'd Nutrients
240
0
70
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
16.40
"2115 10115
Supp�iedB}':
r";1; '`„.i ,}i' lit `
{,tE9i' `� s” " j` 3t. s' + N l d u
a
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial f ert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Riverview -P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample Date
22.0 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
240
188
478
123
4
7
1
0
oval Rating
75 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
188
408
123
4
7
1
0
Field
E
1610
D10
Req'dNutrients
25
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
A Period911-3/31
App
16.40
911-313 I
Supplied By:
s � t n t: � t;t1" ' x . f�,;�•v
a ' ,
CROP
Small Grain Cover
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Commercial fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Riverview -P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sample Date
0.0 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
25
20
50
13
0
1
0
0
Rating
0 1bslae.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
20
30
l3
0
l
0
0
EPRemoval
Field
1610
Dl1
Req'd Nutrients
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0App
Period
10.70
911-3131
Supplied By:
s_
' .,. 3 ; t + t
— -,- " '
CROP
Small Grain Cover -
Starter•
u
u
u
u
ti'
ti•
u•[
0'
Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Dogue-P
Residual , 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ample Date
0.0 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
25
20
50
13
0
1
0
0
Rating
0 lbs/ae,
Unknown
BALANCE
0
20
50
13
0
1
0
0
FPRc.o"val
Field
1610
Dl1
Req'd Nutrients
*272
0
0
0
0
0
0
0App.
Period
. 10.70
*2115-10/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Dogue-P
Residual
' u
0
0
0
0
"u
0-
0
RYE Sample Date
25.0 Tons 1
11-10-08
1 Manure
272
213
542
140
5
8
1
0
P Removal IRating
1 85 lbs/ac. lUnknown
BALANCE
0
2131
5421
1401
51
8
1 1
0
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/6/2009 NMR Page Page 1 of 8

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20 Mg
(lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Traci Field
1610
D6
Req'd Nutrients
25
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
23-00
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
a'4�- Il . —iW, ",Ili �, .
ri 74
"
, P, , -�:
CROP
Small Grain Cover
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Fliwassee
Residual
0
0
0
U
RYE Sample Date
�T
RYE
0,0 Tons
-
11-10-
Manure
25
20
13,
----a
1
0
P Removal
P M
1
I Rating
0 Ib5/ac,
Unknown
BALANCE
0
20
30
13
0
1
0
0
TI - -I
Traci I Field
1610
D6
Req'd Nutrients
*272
0
70
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
23.00
*2/15-10115
Supplied By;
CROP 'Corn,
Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Ferl, 0 o 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Hiwassee
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
25.0 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
272
213
542
140
5
8
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
85 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
213
472
140
5
81
1
0
Tract I Field
1610
D7
Req'd Nutrients
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
1.90
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
P.
CROP
Small Grain Cover
Starter
01
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert, 01 0 0 01 0 0 01
0
Soil Series
Dogue-P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
ol
0
RYE Sample Date
0.0 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
25
20
50
13
0
1
0
0
P Removal Rating
0 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
20
50
13
0
1
0
0
Tract Field
1610
D7
Req'd Nutrients
*272
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I App. Period
1.90
*2/15-10/15
Supplied By�
CROP
Com, Silage
Staner
0
01
0 1
01
0
0
0
1
Commercial Fen. 0 01 01 01 0 01 0
7—Al
Soil Series
Doguc-P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
0
RYE
RYE Sample Date
25.0 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
272
213
542
140
5
8
1
0
PRemoval Rating
85 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE ..
0
213
542
140
5
8
1
0
Tact I Field
Tract,
1610
D8
Req'd Nutrients
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
11.00
9/1-3131 1
Supplied By:
W; ......
CROP
Small Grain Cover
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Hiwassee
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEI Sample Date
0.0 Tons
1 11-10-08
Manure,
251
201
501
131
01
11
01
01
P Removal I Rating
i 0 lbs/ac, -
ijUnknown
BALANCE
1 01
201
501
131
OL
I
1 01
01
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/612009 NMR Page Page 2 of 8

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR j N P2O5
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A).
K20 Mg Mn
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Zn
(IbsIA)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Fieid 1610 DS Req'd Nutrients *272 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
Acres,,,1�
TApp. Period 11.00 -2115-10115 Supplied By: 0,1
Nl�
CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0
Commercial Fen. 0 0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
Soil Series Iliwassec Residual ------ T 0
----U
----U
----u
u
I RYEJ amp a ate 25.6 Tons 1 anurel 2 2-1 213
—542-. 14 —5
8
1— 0
•
P Removal I Rating 1 85 Ibs/ac. jUnknown I BALANCE 1 11 2111
... 1411 .140 51
8
1 1
1 01
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data,
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/612009 NMR Page Page 3 of 8

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A) I
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
1610
DIO
Req'd Nutrients
240
0
70
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
16.40
'12/15-10/15
Supplied By:
J�P
CROP
COM, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
of Seriesivervteu-Kesi
est
KyFiamp a ate22.0
Ions
l I - RT-ur—
ManurF
21-5--l-67
----4Zff 10 4 -----6
1
—(y
P Removal I Rating
75 lbslac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
169
358
110
4
6
1
01
Tract Field
1610
D 1
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
16.40
911-3131
Supplied By:
1 1W,
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
0
Soil Series
Riverview -P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYF Sample Date
9.0 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
100
78
199
51
2
3
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
49 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
78
t79
51
2
3
0
0
Tract I Field
1610
Dl
Req'd Nutrients
117
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acre, App. Period
10,70
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
�W �111111F I'll i
"'F "n
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Dogue-P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0;
0
0
RVE I Sampic Date
10.5 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
117
92.
233
60
2
3
01
P Removal
I Rating
57 lbstac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
92
233
60
2
3
01
0
Tract I Field
1630
D11
Req'd Nutrients
*272
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
10.70
*2/15-10115
Supplied By:
N,�V.. �.�
—4-
'N'
t:, 44
t �1, " `.,
.7
4
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial- Fert.. 01 01 0. 0 0 0 0
Soil Series
Dogue-P
Residual
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
Sample
25.0 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
247
194:
492
127
5
7
1
0
vat I Rating
85 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
194
492
127
5
7
1
0
Traci I Field
1610
D6
Req'd Nutrients
122
0
20.
0
0.
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
23.00
911-3131
Supplied By:
"t.: j 1.
'4
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Hiwassee
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 RYE Sample Date
11,0 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
1 1221
961
243,
63,
21
41
0
P Removal Rating
1
1 59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
1 961
2231
631
21
4 1
o
—i
o
l 0
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8W2009 NMR Page Page 4 of 8

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
I
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract TF 71d
1610
D6
Req'd Nutrients
*272
0
70
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App Period
23.00
*2115 10115
Supplied By:
41"
.1
Aij 01
CROP
COM, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
of Series
iwassee
Residua
25
R YE sample L)a
—757-r—ons
Manure 47 194 X92
127
5
—7
t
Rating
85 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
194
422
127
5
7�
1
01
EPRe-o'val
Tract
Tract I Field
1610
D7
Req'd Nutrients
*272
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App Period
1.90
*2/15-10/15
Supplied By:
4
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Bogue-P
Residual
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
RYE Sample
25.0 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
247
194
492
127
5
7
1
a
I Rating
85 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
194
492
127
51
7
1
0
Tract I Field
Tr
1610
07
Req'd Nutrients
117
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App, Period
1.90
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
.1) AT �i
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Dogue-P
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYEj Sample Date
10.5 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
117
92
233
60
2
3
0
0
P Removal J Rating
57 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
92
233
60
2
3
0
0
Tract I Field
1610
DS
Req'd Nutrients
*272
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
11.00
*2/15-10/15
Supplied By:
Z" 41
CROP
JCorn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Hiwassee
Residual
25
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
RYE Sample Date
25.0 Tons
11-10.08
Manure
247
194
492
127
5
7
1
0
-oval Rating
8 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
194
492
127
5
7
1
0
EPR.
Tract I Field
Tract
1610
D8
Req'd Nutrients
122
0
G
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
1j22
9/1-3/31
Supplied By'
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Staner
0
0
0
0'
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Hiwassee
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample Dale
11.0 Tons
1 I
11-10-08
Manure
1221
96
243
63 1
2
1 4
01
01
P Removal I Rating
59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
I BALANCE
1 01
96
243
631
21
11
0
Oj
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data,
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 816/2009 NMR Page Page 5 of 8

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
3
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg Mn
(lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Zn
{lbs/A)
Cu '
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract_FF 71d
1610
DIO
Req'd Nutrients
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
. 0
Acres App. Period
16.40
1 4/1-9115
Supplied By:
i4l II­,'r,',;�,IS,.
CROP
Soybeans, Full Season
Starter
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0
0
of Neries
R_Iv­c­r_vIe`W­-ff_
Kess Tat
--W5Tu—
MamlTe
—0
—Or
0
0
V
Rating
3 lbslac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
-20
0
0
0
0
0
EPRr.-mal
Tract I
T'.
Field
1610
DIO
Req'd Nutrients
100
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
16.40
911-3131
Supplied By�
-W
ji, 4h444
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
01
0
0
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Riverview -P
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
9,0 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
80
63
159
41
1
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
49 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
63
139
41
1
2
0
Tract I Field
1610
D1
Req'd Nutrients
117
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
10-70
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Dogue-P
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0:
0
0
RYE
RYE Sample Date
10.5 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
97
76
193
50
2
3
0
PRcrmnoval Rating
57 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
76
193
50
2
3
0
0
Traci I Field
1610
D11
Req'dNutrients
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App Period
10.70
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
'i" W" L17! W
CROP
Soybeans, Full Scason
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
Commercial Fert. 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0
01
Soil Series
Dogue-P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
50 bu.
11-10-08
Manure
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P Removal Rating
40 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Tract I Field
1610
D6
Req'd Nutrients
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
23,00
4/1-9/15
!Supplied By:
l., . 1 � 11! 1'' -,
'p, in
-N
{Itt til
T :
CROP
Soybeans, Full Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Hiwassee
Residual
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
YE Sample Dace
50 bu.
11-10-08
Manure
0
01
01
01
01
01
01
0
P Removal I Rating
40 lbsiac.
lUnknown
BALANCE _t
01
01
-20
01
_j
q
01
01
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/6/2009 NMR Page Page 6 of 8

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
3
N
(lbs1A)
P2O5
(lbs1A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg Mn
(lbs1A) (lbs1A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs1A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
1610
D6
Req'd Nutrients
122
0
20
0
0 0
0
0
Acres APP Period
23.00
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
,t e�t
do ,,
�4 ,
< it,�t
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil ri
Residaal
0 6
4
ample'i
—11-.0 Tons
--H- 1 -
" '� `tt�lanu
— 102,-----80 --2
— —5
3
Rating
59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
80
183
52
2 3
0
0
EPRv-o'vai
Field
1610
D7
Req'd Nutrients
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
App, Period
1.90
4/1-9115
Supplied By:
..11le
CROP
Soybeans, Full Season
Starter
0
0
0
01
0 0
01
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Dogue-P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
RY£ Sample Date
50 bu.
11-10-08
Manure
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
40 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Traci Field
1610
D7
Req'd Nutrients
117
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Acres APP Period
1.90
911-3131
Supplied BY
I
Cj,
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Dogue-P
Residual
20
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
ample Date
10.5 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
97
76
193
50
2 3
0
0
Rating
57 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
76
193
50
2 3
0
0
rPR=no"val
Field
1610
D8
Req'd Nutrients
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
App. Period
11.00
4/1-9115
Supplied By:
t<' ;?
1
CROP
Soybeans, Full Season
Starter
0
0
0
0
0 0
01
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Hiwassee
Residual
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Sample Date
50 bu.
11-10-08
Manure
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
oval Rating
40 Ibslac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Field
E
1610
D8
Req'd Nutrients
122
0
0
0
00
0
0
A Period
PP
11,00
911-3131
Supplied
pP Y�
�i €€ i �`' -' t r ;1%�
`�
„; c i'
, � is ��, 'c.:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Commercial Fen, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Hiwassee
Residual
20
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
11.0 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
102
80
203
52
2 3
0
0
P RemovalRating
1 59 lbs/ac.
Unknown
I BALANCE
1 0
80
203
52
2 3
0
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data,
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 8/6!2009 NMR Page Page 7 or 8

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
4
N
(IWA)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn I
(lbs/A)
Cu Limc
(ibs/A) (tons/A)
Traci I Field
1610
DIO
Req'd Nutrients
212
0
70
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
16.4()
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
"W! �4f
CROP
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
a
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
of 'E—rics
Riverview -P
_RLSiduat
0
0
0
0
-A -
K1r_j OMP[CaJac
4.3 Tons
.12,
—1-66 ----422- 109----4 6
—1-
P Removal I Rating
60 lbs/ac.
UnkD0Wfl
BALANCE
0
166
352
109
41
6
1 0
Tract I Field
1610
i D11
Req'dNutrients
282
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Acres I App Period
10.70
' 3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
I "I' I q j 1-4 I"p," q
CROP
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
01 0
Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
Soil Series
Dogue-P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
RYEJ Sample Date
5.7 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
282
221
561
145
5
8
1 0
P Removal
I Rating
79 lbstac,
Unknown
BALANCE
0
2211
561
145
5
8
1 0
Tract I Field
1610
D6
Req'd Nutrients
282
01
70
0
a
0
0 0
Acres I App. Period
23,00
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
i 1�� O
!1 ' a ht'
CROP
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
Starter
0
0
—
0
0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series
HiAassee
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
RYE
RYE Sample Date
5.7 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
282
221
561
1
145
51
8
1 0
PRemoval Rating79
lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
221
491
145
5 1
8
1 0
Traci I Field
T
1610
D7
Req'd Nutrients
282
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
1.90
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:v'q
a; z -
CROP
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
Starter
0
01
0
01
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 01 01 01 01 0 0 0
Soil Series
Dogue-P
Residuali
0
01
0'
0
01
0
01 0
RYE Sample Date
"
5,7 Tons
11-10-08
Manure
282
221
561
145
5
8
1 0
PRemoval
I Rating
79lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
221
561
145
5
8
1 0
Trac; I Field
Tract
1610
D8
Req'd Nutrients
282
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
11.00
3115-8/31
Supplied By.*
V, "J, 4
A
CROP
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
Starter
0 1
0
0
D
0
0
0 0
Commercial Pert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series
Hiwassee
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
EdSample Date
5.7 Tons
I 1I -i0-08
Manure
282
221
5611
745
5
8
1
P Removal
Rating
79 lbs/ac.
Pnkriown
I BALANCE
01
2211
561. 1
1451
51
8
1 01
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 816Y2009 NMR Page Page 8 of 8

r
i
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tes
copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual sail analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adi
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by divi
zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and, multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current
can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a silmmary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in th6 optimum range for crop production .
Rernrireri 4nil Test Values
licate excessive levels of
ly affect plant growth.
the amount of copper and
ndex for copper or zinc, we
it sample. Application of
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
'.Lime Recom.
(ions/acre)
Cu -1
Copper Recommendation
Zn -1
Zinc Recommendation
1610
DIO
Corn, Silage
6.4
r' 0.0
157
NoneI68
N ne
WO
DIO
Small Grain Cover
6.4
0.0
157
None
168
N ne
1610
D10
Corn, Silage
6.4
0.0
157
None
168
N ne
1610
D10
Small Grain, Silage
6.4
0.0
157
None
168
N ne
1610
D10
Soybeans, Full Season
6.4
0.0
157
None
168
Noe
1610
D10
Small Grain, Silage
6.4
0.0
157
None
168
N ne
1610
D10
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
6,4
0-0
157
None
168
N ne
1610
D11
Corn, Silage
6.0
0.0
256
None
411
N ne
1610
D11
Small Grain Cover
6.0
0.0
256
None
411
N ne
1610
Di I
Corn, Silage
6.0
0.0
256
None
411
N ne
1610
D11
Small Grain, Silage
6.0
0.0
256
None
411
N ne
1610
DI l
Soybeans, Full Season
6.0
0.0
256
None
411
Ngne
1610
DI I
Small Grain, Silage
6.0
0.0
256
None
4 t 1
Nd--
1610
D11
Sorghum -Sudan Ilay
6.0
0.0
256
None
4i 1
N ne
1610
D6
Corn, Silage
6.0
0.0
176
None
205
N ne
1610
D6
Small Grain Cover
6.0
0.0
176
None
205
N ne
1610
D6
Corn, Silage
6.0
0.0
176
Mone
205
N ne
1610
D6
Small Grain, Silage
6.0
0.0
176
None
205
N ne
1610
D6
Soybeans, Full Season
6.0
0.0
176
None
205
N ne
WO
D6
Small Grain, Silage
6.0
0.0
176
None
205
Ndne
1610
D6
I Sorghum -Sudan Ilay
6.0
0.01
176
1 None
205
N ne
1610
L D7
Corn, Silage
6.0
0.01
256
1 None
41dl
N ne
1610
D7
Small Grain Cover
6.0
O.O
256
None
41N
ne
-...-----"---------i- ------------------- -- ------•----------------- ---------------------------------------- -------------------------------- - - ---------- ..
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-06-2009 STV Page Page 1 of 2

Rarntirarl Cnil Tact Vnhieq
Tract
Field
Crap
pil
I Lime Recom.
?; (ions/acre)
Cu -1
Copper Recommendation
Zn -I
Zinc Recommendation
1610
D7
Corn, Silage
6.0
z; 0.0
256
None
411
N nc
1610
D7
Small Grain, Silage
6.0
0.0
256
None
411
None
1610
D7
Soyheans, Full Season
6.0
0.0
256
None
411
Nc ne
1610
D7
Small Grain, Silage
6.0
0.0
256
None
411
N ne
1610
D7
1 Sorghum -Sudan I lay
6.0
0.0
256
None
411
N ne
1610
DR
Com, Silage
6.3
l' 0.0
476
None
361
None
IN
1610
D8
Small Grain Cover
6.3
0.0
476
None
361
ne
1610
D8
Corn, Silage
63
0.0
476
None
361
Nome
1610
DR
Small Crain, Silage
6.3
0.0
476
None
361
N ne
1610
D8
Soybeans, Full Season !
6.3
0.0
476
None
361
N ne
1610
DR
Small Grain, Silage
6-3
0.0
476
None
361
None
1610
DR
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
6-3
0.0
476
None
361
N 'ne I
-- -- -------- ------------- ------ --------- -- ------ ----- -- ----- ----------- ----- -------- --------------------------------------- ----- ----------- --------
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-06-2009
v
STV Page Page 2 of 2

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Gztes_must_first-e�aluatedfo>r their sui armor-sludg"ppliration. Ideall�f�ent-spray-f-mlds-hould-not net -be -us foo
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not toted effluent-pplicatitznfieldswith-high-amounts�f
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA -N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Dairy (Milk Cow) Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Cum 120 bu
150
23.25 62.10 124.19
186.29
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
46.50 31.05 62.10
93.14
Soybean 40 bu
160
24.80 58.22 116.43
174.65
—.1..... ....... ........................ ----... ......................... --- ------- --- ....................................... ..--....................---.........
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-06-2009 Sludge Page Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility, If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure, Either of these
situations in ick' ates that t e p anne app tcation intim in the waste uditzation plan is inconsistent with e
structures temporary sturage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacitv
SourceName I Dal (Milk Cow) La oon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Stan Date 911
180
Pian Year Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
0
1
3
2
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
150
1
12
119
2
1
119
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180'
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
180
_ - -- 2
11
180
2
12
180
3
1
149
3
2
180
3
3
180
................................................................................................... .............................. ----..............
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-06-2009 Capacity Page Page 1 of 2

Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name I Dai (Milk Cow) La oon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date 911
180
Pian Year Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
3
4
150
3
5
119
3
6
89
3
7
58
3
8
27
3
9
180
3
10
180
3
11
180
3
12
180
4
1
149
4
2
180
4
3
180
4
4
180
4
5
180
4
6
180
4
7
156
4
8
125
4
9
95
4
10
64
4
11
34
4
12
3
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
........................---ry - --g......g.. ..
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-06-2009 Capacity Page Page 2 of 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreementor-f r use of —adequate land on wlti-e-W to properly appy the
waste.—If t ell produceroes notown adegatelan -to p—" roperly dispose of -the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 14 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
vHaste should Ifildf be -App ffied wlieii'there'is danger of drift from -the land""'
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste.shall be applied at rates not.to exceed the soil infiltration rate such.
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
...................................................... . ... ...... ...... - -- --
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: $1612009 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops -on -soils_ with_a_high,._potentialfor eaching. WasteLnutrientloading-rates on
these -soils should b ieldAO a miinimun-anda-suitable_winte-�anted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
f
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
'ry prior eonverted�cropland''provide t e 166cis nave neer approveu as'a iariu "
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
.................... ------------------------------------- -- ..... ........ --------..---.--....--.-.......---- .-. .. .-
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 8/6/2009 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsib obtaining ani-implemwitia w"'clos-ur"laa " w1dd Tu M—elhm1. e
he o iilty of an discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
-. .-. _ hnenrl, nn, n4hnr-n.4r. n.+*r rne'se�tia•rt in. en-. �n.aror nrr.�inn*inn rn♦n than- n ni+rnrxnn . _
�i'::1_Y.:iwL:L•=1•2"4'LL'�.SLrLS•(.'. `�CSd
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23.- Dead animals wili-be disposed of in a manner that meets 'North Carolina
regulations.
-------------- .......... ........ .....
574674 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 8/6/2009 Specification Pape 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): D10, Dl 1, 07
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
vn,lrarea and_conditions._A-ppjv�o 12_1bs__nitrogen-per_ton-of_expected-yield All nitrogen Cap he
aoRl3ed at tenting. Also apply-23-tQ3 cogen at -planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen, Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): D6, D8
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 213 to 314 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
W :,_ _ _
g1'U1�`lll�'.�sC8s1711�tU U-1-1-1 0-1-1 iClll-StaIUJ UI L1lG C01 -11.i 1. lulcly u�lailagLiliGlli'Vi VVGGUJ &ilu 'tilS2eib i$
essential in profitable corn silage production, Plant a cover crop after harvest.
----------------------- --- -----------------..-- ...............--------------.....................--.--
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-06-2009 Crop Note Page Page I of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): D10, D11, D7
Soybeans: Piedmont
The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25 -May 25. Review the NCSU Official
Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row
foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the
seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 112" and adequate depth
control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by soil test report can be appliedat planting.
Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However,
applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor.
Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the
soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): D6, D8
Soybeans: Piedmont
The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25 -May 25. Review the NCSU Official
Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row
foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the
seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 112" and adequate depth
control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting.
Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However,
applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor.
Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the
soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): D10, D11, D7
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 112" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till, Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time., The remaining -N should be -applied during February-: March. Apply 10 to"] 2 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 08-06-2009 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): D6, D8
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at I-1 112" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also increase the initial seedinP rate by at least Id% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): D10, D11, D7
Small Grain Cover Crop
The following crop note applies to field(s): D6, D8
Small Grain Cover Crop
The following crop note applies to field(s): D10, D11, D7
Sorghum -Sudan: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s): D6, D8
Sorghum -Sudan: No Comment
------- ------ -------------------- -------------
574674 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed; 08-06-2009 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 3

Soils Map Piedmont Research Station Date: 8152009
Customer{s}: NCDA & CS RESEARCH STATION
District: ROWAN SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Assisted By. Sloop, Christopher
Legal Description: Soil Map Units
V �
Dow ,
s
,1 VYi3a i .. 4
}f/'" CM r
Ch A
c o-8 r � � _ , , ii!.� s, �•, _
coo
PAD
nd 5�T
I
oils Map ❑ HwB2 ❑ PXD ;,E
gall other values> ❑ HwC2 ❑ RvA UhC °R 0.62`
MUSYM ❑ MbB ❑ Ud s
CCB ElMbC ❑ UhC
CCC ❑ McB2 ❑ UhE ti
CeB2 ❑ McC2 ❑ W
CeC2 ❑ PaD ❑ WaA <
❑ ChA ❑ PaE ❑ ZeB
❑ DOB ❑ PCC2 ❑ ZeC
❑ EnB ❑ PxB
❑ HsD ❑ PxC
N
O 2,000 0 2,000 4,000
Feet

Sails Inventory Report
Soils Inventory Report
Wed Aug 5 11:34:23 EDT 2009
NCDA & CS RESEARCH STATION
Map Unit Symbol
Acres
Percent
US
8.2
1%
CCC
1.2
0%
CeB2
25.5
3%
CeC2
63.7
7%
ChA
150
16%
DoB
54.2
6%
EnB
20.2
2%
HsD
26.2
3%
HwB2
225
24%
HwC2
33.6
4%
MbB
7.3
1%
MbC
22.2
2%
Me62
82
9%
McC2
8.8
1%
PaD
41.6
4%
PaE
0.9
0%
PcC2
20
2%
PxB
5.9
1%
PxC
5.3
1%
PxD
3.7
0%
RvA
27.6
3%
Ud
0.1
0%
UhC
33.7
4%
UhE
41.6
4%
W
16
2%
WaA
6.7
1%
ZeB
4.1
0%
ZeC
13.3
1%
Total:
948.6
Page 1 of 1
file://C:1Documents and Settingslchristopher.slooplMy Customer Files Too lkit\Piedmont R.,. 8/5/2009