490087_PERMIT FILE_20171231

* Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review OO Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 49 137
Permitted 0 Certified Q Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date of Visit 1/28/2000
Q Not Operational 0 Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Slilt.KcadAmPailrx .................................................................................... County: Redell............... .................................. MRO..........
OwnerName: jegry........................................ Rayne.$ ........................... Phone No: b.7.6:7.4612 ....................................................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 37.8.1ilrmgg€ r..Rid .............................. ... Rar any..N.C............................. ........ M.034 ..............
Onsite Representative: NONE ... Integrator:........
Location of Farm:
...........................................................................................................................................................
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Swine C'anarity Pnnitlatian
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ® Dairy 140 1 15
❑ Non -Layer I I❑Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 140
Y
Total SSLW 196,000
Number of Lagoons 0 Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0
Discharges & Stream Inrettcks
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State`? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
ReviewerlInspector Name :Alan Johnson Rocky Durham
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

a
0 Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review .O lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 49 132
© Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date of Visit 1/28/2000
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: I ....... I ....... ...
Farm Name: J.cffexy..R,.JSafjey.FOxM..........................
..................I......1..................... ..... County: Jr.e.d.ell ................................................ MRO ..........
Owner Name:Jeffgr.Y.li ............................... S.0f1gy.......................................................... Phone No: 5.4!6-7567.................................
....................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title Phone No:
Mailing Address: lit.. 1.l er .1 1 .................................................. tlaxxnan�y.. NC............................ ..... 28.63.4..............
.................................. ......................
Onsite Representative: NONE ...... N.O.,S.T.H.U.C.'tlRE.............................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
ttd�.Zl3..(Fcath��K.l1;d,).kiaxalourANC,.. �pprQa;,.1.pnil�.eas>x.Q.11��pnt7riy..�xt.Id xn.9.Rl.......................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
❑ Swine ® Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Canneity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
® Layer 1 18000 0 ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 18,000
Total SSLW 72,000
Number of Lagoons I NA 1 Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. II' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/inspector Name .Alan Johnson Rocky Durham
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

c
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Jerry Haynes
Still Meadow Dairy
378 Renegar Rd
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Jerry Haynes:
Awl@ •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOUR
N.C. Cs.rll
ZWI RON WB % t 7t wl (tw
March 3, 1998 & NA'tV1a:, L ftM)%,'R('ft
MAR 5 1998
� .8 Imont ttt"Cato
Ll flow Ma
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 49-87
Iredeil County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan and contact the Division of Water
Quality prior to stocking animals. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans
are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Pouln with a li uid wastes tem 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
rvm
cc-Md6resville_Water-Quality.Regionai:0ffice-
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recyded/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Jerry Haynes
Still Meadow Dairy
378 Renegar Rd
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Jerry Haynes:
r••
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
N.C. nFPT. 0?
February 11, 1998 .'.4 ti-anAlA t,
b -4A t'U1'.At. RESOURCES
FEB 2r) 1998
19VISION CF Ft1V1RG!1'.MT4 t'4t!AaiMENT
H s,?t. ifilE RrUBRAL 01110E
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Still Meadow Dairy
Facility Number: 49-87
Iredell County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification fo;
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation.for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. Thesespecial agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an'application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below, the threshold established inl5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below cenain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A),
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

=71
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 22, 1998
Jerry Haynes
378 Renegar Rd.
Harmony, NC 28660
Subject: State Register
Still Meadow Dairy, Facility #: 49-87
Iredell, NC
Dear Mr. Haynes:
Because you are no longer operating your dairy it should be removed from the
state register. A request from the owner is required to remove the facility from the list. By
remaining on the list, it is designated as being in operation and above the threshold limit
of 100 animals or has been placed on the list due to environmental concerns. In either
case, the facility is subject to an inspection.
PIease fill out the enclosed form and forward to Sue Homewood at the address on
the bottom of the sheet. Your prompt attention on this matter would be greatly
appreciated.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
me at [phone].
AJ
Sincerely,
w/ � Z�-
r
Alan Johnson
Environmental Specialist II
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 26115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
Jerry Haynes
Still Meadow Dairy
378 Renegar Rd
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Mr. Haynes:
ALT.WXA
IT
4. IL'* �WeAj
low 0%
IL
rrr. o
0 H S'UPAL UR
PAL
—7 OUC 8 1 1991
tilailayOI IT
I! ZWBIT
iltl Qg4aYw gl
Subject: Classification of Animal Waste Management Systems
Facility: Still Meadow Dairy
Facility ID #: 49-87
County: Iredell
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge (OIC) by January 1, 1997, for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more
horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management
system. Our records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets
the requirements for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is available for animal waste management system operators. For
information on the training programs please contact your local Cooperative Extension Agent. Operator
certifications are issued by the Water Pollution Control Systems Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). For information on the certification process, please contact the Technical Assistance and
Certification Unit at [phone]. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each
system is based on the nature of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat
the animal waste. There are two types of animal waste management systems, type A and type B. Type A
animal waste management systems are generally used to treat waste generated by monogastric animals
which produce a low -fiber waste. Type B animal waste management systems are generally used to treat
waste generated by ruminants and other animals which produce a high -fiber waste. The type of training and
certification an operator receives should correspond with the type of system(s) they intend to operate. For
more information on the classification of your system please contact the Technical Assistance and
Certification Unit.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not
intend to operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or
engage a contract operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge,
whether yourself or another person, must possess a currently valid certificate of the appropriate type.
Sincerely,
L4W.t•)4�
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cd/AW OIC Designation
Enclosure
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

L�
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Jerry Haynes
378 Renegar Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Haynes:
I Tk4
AHMR�Tl
NCDENFZ
NORTH CARouNA DEPARTMENT OA
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL ResouRces
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 28, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Still Meadow Dairy, Facility #: 49-87
Iredell County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office visited you dairy on October 21, 1997 to verifiy that it was no
Ionger in operation. Because it is not in operation, the central office in Raiiegh will be notified by this
Office that your facility can be removed from the state register. If at sometime in the future you decide to
reestablish the dairy operation and will have 100 or more animals, a certified waste management plan as
well as a certified operator will be required before any animals will be allowed at the facility.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover.
Also, please be advised that for violations of state environmental laws and regulations, North Carolina
General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
V, /��Ga~J-e5
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main St., Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Farm Name: _. 513Ll..._........„. ............
_...._.
OwnerNan]e:.„.
141ailiaRA
gAddress:.._(.. lSts.e
Onsite Representative: �_�.4t1�� • r Integrator:
Certified Operator: _„.. �_ .„„. _...._ ......... _ r ...... ._. __... .„ �..... _ Operator Certification Number.-
Location
umber:Location of Farm:
tr.�.,�c.....•..!o.�n,.._��t,c- .. _�. -�.. ate_. �......lx�.. rs.� �f� .. _ ... ...zd.... _..........._ �
izLk . �7
el trn_. - -?h6r� VCk
Latitude L,�• ��+ ��u Longitude U• ��j+ �J++�+titVi gnu{L P�
7
of Operational Date Last Operated:
Type'of Operation and Design Capacity
Y
•
SW1nB ¢3 <3;�L} ;NumheC�'”` POtIItrY r Nu bet i!Cattle c # H2ttx
r.> _ ... m , . Ntimbei xy
❑ Wean to Feeder' ❑ Laver
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ -LayerNon ❑ Beef x�
tfEl Farrow to Wean`
.. ,�, >ti '{ r ', r w y✓ ,rss;, i�.wS :sL `> § r43r 'r
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish ❑ Other Type of Livestock
�. k � � .� .�: �� � r f �:. �• ,,,� �.:>^: _ ,,+ �R �” „ :"� ,���; ...;,<,��� re -
Subsurface Drains Present
Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
General /vv J- ii D/) e re�, t7 o/-)
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes' ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
4, Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. Does any pan of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑,Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on buck
❑DSWC
Animal Feedlot Operation Re�lew
Pr
Animal Feedlot Operation Site hspectalon
outine O Complaint
O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection SW Use 24 hr. time
j
Farm Status: .fie`„r3„ST_�....�_ . _.... „ ...
'Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview [
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)”—=—�
Farm Name: _. 513Ll..._........„. ............
_...._.
OwnerNan]e:.„.
141ailiaRA
gAddress:.._(.. lSts.e
Onsite Representative: �_�.4t1�� • r Integrator:
Certified Operator: _„.. �_ .„„. _...._ ......... _ r ...... ._. __... .„ �..... _ Operator Certification Number.-
Location
umber:Location of Farm:
tr.�.,�c.....•..!o.�n,.._��t,c- .. _�. -�.. ate_. �......lx�.. rs.� �f� .. _ ... ...zd.... _..........._ �
izLk . �7
el trn_. - -?h6r� VCk
Latitude L,�• ��+ ��u Longitude U• ��j+ �J++�+titVi gnu{L P�
7
of Operational Date Last Operated:
Type'of Operation and Design Capacity
Y
•
SW1nB ¢3 <3;�L} ;NumheC�'”` POtIItrY r Nu bet i!Cattle c # H2ttx
r.> _ ... m , . Ntimbei xy
❑ Wean to Feeder' ❑ Laver
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ -LayerNon ❑ Beef x�
tfEl Farrow to Wean`
.. ,�, >ti '{ r ', r w y✓ ,rss;, i�.wS :sL `> § r43r 'r
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish ❑ Other Type of Livestock
�. k � � .� .�: �� � r f �:. �• ,,,� �.:>^: _ ,,+ �R �” „ :"� ,���; ...;,<,��� re -
Subsurface Drains Present
Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
General /vv J- ii D/) e re�, t7 o/-)
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes' ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
4, Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. Does any pan of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑,Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on buck

Facflity Number: --
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed`? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structures (Lagopns,;Iloldine Ponds, Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure _I Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft.): .....................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the .structures observed;' ❑ Yes ❑ No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
El No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No -violations or deficiencies were noted during this'visit.' You will receive no further
correspondence about this.visit'. .
zi ients (refer t -o question ft ;Explait any YES answers and/or any`recommendations., or any other commen
drawings of facility to better explamFsituations. (use additional pages as necessarv) b:
C'OuId 401 co,I 4e lo'_ //ci 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

a ❑ DSWC Animal `Fl
��,jWQ Aniiaal FeE
1EHfoutine 0 Complaint 0 Folio ►r -up of WVQ inspecti
F261ity Number.
Farm Status: ...... ..._ ._. I ...
peratilon'
Follow-up of DSWC-review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection S' Use 24 hr. time
Total Time (in hours) Spent onRevie`v !�
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: .»_...... sal: ���;,_ �.» �. _....» ..., County:..»»...'r�' ...
............_............_» ......
Owner Name: ......... __.... _... __._.._ ».._..... Phone No:. 2:2_. ... (.. ....__.....r... _...__
Mailing Address: 3 7 ....f 1 �.R� �� y _.. _ _....._...., _CLQ tay.__....
»»
Onsite Representative: _ »Ql�.i ... » ......._ ....__.... ...�_.._ .__ ..... Integrator :........... __.........._...._........
_ .... _....__....._...
CertifiedOperator: .» . _ _........._ ..._. __........._._._........._. _..... _....._..... _ Operator Certification Number: _............................. ...
Lavation of Farm: .
Latitude ��• L_�` ��� Longitude �«
...�• �` ��'� t
44 dc�wc�rc�u�l
'ot Operationalj Date Last Operated: _.__.....1. _ 1.... �� ..... _.........__.... _.... .
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Y
--`-`cxsy*:,,raSax -� -%.�i <k�,,-�, 3"'Y+�t,,++��.5'..w, '"``Sd .2�c, `t..-'?:✓�"Sd�`Sf"n3.1"c`�rt',,.�,�3^a
W,Rd.'i .
Swine day,.' z *fia. Fs Number , w#� %polli z z a t
R.
Number Cattle ,k*� �Nu�ber
❑Feeder to Finish4 ❑ No -La er [] Beef _
Farrow to WeanY 3 "# `V;v
Farrow to Feeder '. f � � +� ' k} ? 5 � r t}
Farrow to Finish ❑ Other Type of Livestock Y • g°k
r4.,a „moi ''i a+ ;, -,�.; ? n- a�a• z-F'�' .a� =rd« i 'Sar4, .e;s'^_-3F�'°'> :;j,s a �?^- �,a9ve'.p •'" 5'
,Number of Lagoons �lEmmHaldjrig Ponds�JU Subsurface Drains Present
,
❑ Lagoon Area ^ ❑ Spray Field Area ;
neral /va ij l ®� e— el-)
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
0 Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structures f Lagoons,Ilalding Fonds, .Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
No. violations 'or' deficiencies. were noted during this; visit.- You 'will receive no further
correspondence about this'. visit'.-. .: .
...
Cominents,(refer to question''#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any oth e,camments.
Identifier:
_.
Freeboard(ft):........•................................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application`'
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type.......................................................•.............................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvers mt?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No. violations 'or' deficiencies. were noted during this; visit.- You 'will receive no further
correspondence about this'. visit'.-. .: .
...
Cominents,(refer to question''#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any oth e,camments.
r
Use drawings of facility to 64ter explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): #E„
= `
_.
v 7L- vn�
o Cr4 4,c %hr !fig pe 712514
Reviewer/Inspector Name .:,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.; Director
Jerry Haynes
Still- Meadow Dairy
378 Renegar Rd
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Mr. Haynes:
DFENCNFZ
)�.rlr. oi?
April 3, 1997r�vjf•Orra3=;:;.r'r, f;ht_T�L3,
d NATU�tAt, Jtt?S0 L,,Z' F
APR ,? 1997
DIVISM Of II VANAI[gENT
SUBJECT: Notice of ViolaMSVi.LE 1M19AL OFFICE
Designation of Operator in Charge
Still Meadow Dairy
Facility Number 49--87
Iredell County
You were notified by letter dated December 5, 1996, that you were required to designate a certified animal waste
management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that
letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically for your facility, Instructions for Completing
Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator, and an Application for
Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator. Our records indicate that these
completed Forms have not yet been returned to our office.
As was explained in the previous letter, a training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste
management systems involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry (with a liquid waste system). Therefore owners of
these systems were allowed to request that they be issued temporary certifications until December 31, 1997. All that
was required to receive this temporary certification was the completion of the Application Form.
For you convenience, we are sending you additional copies of the Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically
for your facility, Instructions for Completing Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste
Management System Operator, and an Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management
System Operator. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later than April
25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in locating a certified
operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management system, is a violation
of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an appropriately certified operator is designated.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for
any past or future violations for your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and Certification Group at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosures �A�.
• P.O. Box 29535, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 N'Wfc An Equal Opportunity/Affirmotive Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
'Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jerry Haynes
Rt. 2
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Haynes:
[DaHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Still Meadow Dairy, Facility #: 49-87
Iredell County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, N1K ;6 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 �� An Equal opportunitytAf iirmative Action Employer
voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

t.
Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly:
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. ex""ef . -1-"ona,
SupervisorWater Quali egi

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
Jerry Haynes"
Still Meadow Dairy
378 Renegar Rd
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Mr. Haynes:
1DEiHNFZ
N.C. DEPT. Oi+'
ENVMON.NIENT, H? 1r,TF3,
& NATURAL Rjr"oOUIi(,
DEC ? 1996
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation DIVISION OF ENVIUNRINTAI t.!ANASEMENT
Facility: Still Meadow Dairy NOCRESVIILE REMNAL OFFICE
Facility ID #: 49-87
Iredell County
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving '
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste:
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31,1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System ���� Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission NIV An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

JUL-14--1995 15:19 FROM DEM DATER QUALITY SECTION TO
MRO FJ.la4�lbd
Site Requims Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: �' , 1995
Time: ,16
Farm Name/Owner: J Nct y W%Z �i+'i r '
Mailing Address: 37
County: 1:recu
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: Ph
Physical Address/Lacad z` Road -2. A/1 Dk �a� 0e:
_
Type of Operation: Swine — Poultry Cattle k
Design Capacity: UnGC► a"r Number of Animals on Site: 1<""'
DEM Certification Number: ACE.^. DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 35 . yIT � 0" Longitude: 90' �f? Elevation: _Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes 015 Actual Freeboard: —Q— Inches
Was any seepage observed from the la oon(s)? Yes No 'Was'any erosion observed? Yes v`(J
Is adequate land available for s ? 2 or No Is the cover crop a �~r No
eq pray p dequate? �'es or No
Crop(s) being utilized: uhkvlowy,-
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? q or No
100 Feet from Wells? l -or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ori'
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No u^
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes `"L if Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No u"
Additional Comments: JCt j^ '00 1,4 nowt 90 4111
fu t,' ay r u A v%cock ,t lL- locr& 44r Doh 'is
Ste. ninV&w� nDW 644 SGS ave, W04 reSOW d
Inspector Name
cc; Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02