980030_PERMIT FILE_20171231

-
ppP7,
4'>
Department of Environmental Qunl

.. _ - ;�
■'.}
�\ -` _.
� -•�
\ �� ! �
` � J w '�vt. �..�,,'
/� � / �� ..
��
i;�`
__ � _; ���
�� � -°k _ �

.�
I

7-
k
iA

eig
=s

7(')0lo -36

4�
' ! .•T'lat ..
'l �.�
w a
„%.

cl

s ,��

rim :.

00-3(

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Novernber 13, 1996
Charles Nichols
Charles Nichols Farm
Rt 1
Bailey NC 27880
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Charles Nichols Farm
Facility ED#. '98-30
Wilson County
Dear Mr. Nichols:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. if you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerel ,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
ddrm
P.O. Box 27687, ®M I
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 � An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Charles Nichols
Charles Nichols Farm
Rt1
Bailey NC 27880
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Charles Nichols Farm
Facility ID#: 98-30
Wilson County
Dear Mr. Nichols:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincere] ,
A. Preston Howard, Jr.; P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O, Box 27687. W- *
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 VC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative: Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 24, 1997
Charles Nichols
Charles Nichols Farm
6248A Old Raleigh Rd
Sims NC 27880
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 98-30
Wilson County
Dear Charles Nichols:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $ 10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poultry with a liquid waste system 30.000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
I,M
cc: Raleigh Water Quality Regional Office
Wilson Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%a recycled/10% post -consumer paper

E
DSW al Feedlot Operation Review
Q Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
JCKtontine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other l
Date of Inspection d
Facility Number
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13Registered O Certified © Applied for Permit ©Permitted of O erational I Date Last Operated:
�y I
Farm Name: ...L :......./:.✓.. es... .�. .. .1� .5......F? +- County: W.q..s.V"1....................................................
Owner Name: ...... C,11.�,�.-.e...� .... � .�?./ S Phone No- 9 < T........ . 2...4....................
Facility Contact: `-"7 r e 5 i'1 r C� J �S Title; ..... Phone No:
ff
Mailing Address:..GP...............7 4 . f � �,4 �{7 '/.�''`5....,..... �..................�7,�� v......................
ZLI D fLr.. (�
� � tlL�c.- ..
O smote Representative: . lntegrator:...............'
Certified Operator, ........ '✓pJ`................................................................................... .... Operator Certification Number;.........................................
Location of Farm: 14-tw j
..........................................................................................................................................................................................:.......................................................................... �
Latitude a 4C Longitude • ' _'
r- Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
/ Holding Ponds
Design Current Design Current
-.Poultry Capacity ,Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I0 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improve ment?
Subsurface Drains Present JjLJ Lagoon AreaA❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge ori_inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made`'
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ntin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagi�on s} stear�'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge`?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes j o
❑ Yes ;/N0
N
El Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ICJ N
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier: .... l...Z....................
.... ........
Freeboard (ft): ........-�'. 13 .... ......;rT!
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 3 Structure 4
Ej Yes No
❑ Yes ZO
Structure 5 Structure 6
...........................................................................................
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type C,.O1 - .r.r .......................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AW1y1P)?
X 0 /0/ 4
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application'?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency`'
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement'?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. We ny additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.violations-ar deticiencies.were noted during this.visit. YouwuiII receive Ito ftirther
correspondence about this:visit.
❑ Yes �,/�NoYes L�
El Yes No
21�e`su No
❑ Yes 121KO
......................................
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes LDS No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes IdNo
❑ Yes L No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to questEon #) Fxplatn any YES answers and/or any'r�ecomttendations nr?any otleer cnrritt►ents:',
Use draawrngs of facility to better explain situations (use'additiiinal pages as necessary)
:.. r
/I
7h 7!-e
�►�-
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
_ .«.
,Qiar
G�Z✓ ..
i,,.. - s _.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
G �'
Date:
iJ

Facility Number:-98_ _30r
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date:
Time:
General Information:
Farm Name: County:Wilson
Owner Name: Charles Nichols Phone No: -0%-
One Site Representative: Integrator:_
Mailing Address:6248 Old Raleigh Road Sims, NO 27880
Physical Address/Location Same
3 � Lm )
Latitude:
Longitude: 78/06/30
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No, of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑Saw Mayer ❑Dairy
❑Nursery ❑Non -Layer 013eef
❑Feeder
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:.
Number of Lagoons: (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is any discharge observed?: Yes ❑ No ❑
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Acreage:

Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet
of Blue Line Stream?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Does record keeping need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management
Plan on site?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Explain any Yes answers: _
Signature:
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Drawings or Observations:
AOI-January 17, 1996
Date:
Use Attachments if Needed

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Ralelgh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Charles Nichols
6248 Old Raleigh Road
Sims, NC 27880
Dear Mr. Nichols:
Lr!*A
4*
AdAft0dMINOM ���
IDEHNR
Division of Environmental Management
September 13, 1995
Subject:Management Deficiency Notification
Charles Nichols Operation
State Road 1132
Wilson County
On September 7, 1995, Mr. Steve Mitchell from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance
inspection of the subject animal facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine
potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Mitchell's site visit determined that wastewater from your facility was not discharging to the surface
waters of the state. Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the
purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following management deficiencies were observed:
—Your lagoon has little freeboard, less than two inches in some areas. This problem should
receive prompt attention in order to prevent a future discharge or a lagoon breech.
It was noted that a significant amount of weeds are growing along the toe of the lagoon
slope. Trees and weeds can compromise lagoons and cause them to seep wastewater. These
should be removed and the lagoon berm stabilized.
In addition to continued waste facility management, these deficiencies must be immediately,
to help prevent the possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office will requirea
written response to the aforementioned issues within 30 days of receipt of this letter. You should
specifically address how you plan to correct these problems and submit a schedule (with dates)
stating when these management deficiencies will be corrected.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a responsibility of all animal facilities. The
Division of Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect
the natural resources of the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of the
State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day, and may also result in the
loss of deemed permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that you are required to have an approved
animal waste management Plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a designated technical
specialist or a professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Empioyer W% recycled/ 10% post-cormsner paper

The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions
regarding your inspection please call Steve Mitchell at (919) 571--4700.
Sincerely,
t-- a
Kenneth Schuster, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
Ism
H Apigsft
cc: Wilson County Health Department
Ricky Hayes - Wilson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
RRO & Central Files

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. $- 3
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: September 7, 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: Charles Nichols
Mailing Address: 6248 Old Raleigh Road, Sims, N.C. 27880
County: Ptrsrft �
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address /Location,S.R. 1132
Type of Operation: Swine _XX_ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 150 Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number:
ACNEW
Latitude: 36' 44' 10" Longitude: 78' 06' 30" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour
storm event (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) NO Actual Freeboard: 4 inches Any
seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? No Was any erosion observed? No Is
adequate land available for spray? Yes Is the cover crop adequate? Yes/No
Crop (s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? Yes 200 Feet from Dwellings?
Yes 100 Feet from Wells? Yes
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue
Line? No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop) ? Yes/No
Additional Comments: Very close to over topping. No evidence of previous
discharge.
Inspector Steve Mitchell Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.

N
Gila regs'r4s immgdldte at�liori
Follynunar
SATE VISITATION RECORD
oate; Ins
owner: �s yttt4ofs Farm Nam -
County" ' s
Agent Vlsidng $i�: ► ' fir► t
Operator;
do-Slto Rep�esentativs:
Physic,9l Address:
Whine Address:
Type of Operation:
. is
y `
p .
Swine
Design Capoclty: !
Latitude,- s a
Type of Inspection, ✓ Gm4n¢,
Phone;
Phone:
Phone:
Poultry ,,._,., canto
Numbiar of Anlrnale vn Silo:
longitude: a .... -.. _
-- -- Aerial
Circle Yes of No
Does tho Animll Taste Lagoon have tufllclent treaboard of i Foot+ 25 year 24 hoar vLfm event
(approximately i Foot + 7 Inches) Yes or 0
Actual Fteebanrd:
For facilities with mars than any lagoon, pteaas address the athw iagoom' !freeboard under the
comments Section!.
Was any uepage observed from the lagwn(s)7 Yes ai~ o
Was there erosion of tie -dam? Y or .
is ad§quati:.land avallable far IWd apph'Cai 067 or .No
Is the Cover crop adequate? a or No
Additional Comments:
• S
Sicrzattrre of Agent � , �,� ::2.,
Fax [phone]

---'•—.+,+�'aF+�rsca.�,4r^.a*i�nrr.�.. �rrw-r^'�d'^r���uri{^rr�,+9:1y`:a:�Y"is.:::in.ens.iz.a�.�g7sr..SY"4�,��.... .._.. .,,, �.. . -
�:. --- _ n _
�> ❑ DSW -nimal Feedlot Operation Review
Q Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
5
10111outine O Complaint O Follow-uE of D«'Q insps-Ttion Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
i����nnrn uu - — a• rrrrrr
Date of Inspection 3v
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mDm)
[] Registered [3 Certified [3 Applied for Permit © Permitted of Operational Date Last Operated: „%„. .„,,,,,
Farm Name: (.1.�j o.S...4_,..'C,. 4 d / s '` (( =............. County: ..: .."1,.............................. .......................
/...+. ......... ............/...... ..... {� q
Owner Name: C. 1 .(..... 1.....,, aG. ..(�..f. s .. Phone No: T / 1 Z .q j ~ to d 2
//...............................................................................,......,.............
Facility Contact- i9 r r' p S n t� J 15 Title: '�!` ! Phone No: .....
...................................... ......,.....................
(� z �r b r �::........... s:.a-, s .yam g
Alailittg Address. . ...................................................................... 1.......................................................................... ..........................
n fS . (1►. (/ t F►
Oh-siteRepresent.itivc:....p. ......:`........ .......... Integrator: ............... IC11-4r-
...........................................................
Certified Operator;........ .............................. ......... Operator Certification Number..................
Location of Farm: f
1
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... !
Latitude ` 44 Longitude • ` "
Design Current iDesign Current Design ' Current ;
Swine Capacity...Population. Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JE1 Non -Layer ❑Non-0airy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity.
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
so
Number of?moon / Holding Ponds' ❑Subsurface Drains Present IrTLagoon Area 10Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste !Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes No .
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is ob.wrved, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes L`J No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ZNo
c. Ifdischar,e is observed, what is the estimated flow in -al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑YesW�;
6
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? El Yes
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes WN
rnai ntenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97 Continued on back

Zi.P'�S.�wnr... .,r,-W'y-:w.. -• .. ���'•w1iiW�Pvr+y)a`.^iFi`hdaT1•�'�.�iK.�!'"7R}�]iVYiSRi4]T•�`JI�"SIAL�.}i'%d1"M�'Y.��'j�f'S'1'•��'JiiS41'MP` �Fslw:i'f�-�Y4�„F��+,r...rr .. - -
y ,
Facility,Number: —
" •8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on,site which need to be properly closed? ' ' fry...❑ Yes
Structures (Laeoons.11oldinLy Pond. 'Flush_Yits .e_cj f r
9.�t[s storag ce apacity (freeboard plus stdrm storage) less than adequate? ,'�, El Yes o
Structure I Structure 2 t StructurerJ �,. Structure 4 S6uctutt5 s � Structure 6
Identifier:...: 1r� ' ' ')' s 4 Z t.. ' L........................................... .................................
Freeboard(ft): ........: ..:...f ia.:.:......::. .!'..:1...............,.................................................................. .
10. Is seepage observed from'any of.the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other�,threats to the integrity of.any of.theistructures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need'maintenancMmprovement?
! (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat,+notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
.........................................
............................. ........................zNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
Waste.Applivation
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP,, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
ff
15. Crop type..Q. ;..........!.±'f.s........f'..5-................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWYP)'?
f �np�y
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
IS. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is therd� lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement'.
• � r
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of th-e*.'�Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
N/o
❑ Yes
(]-No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
OTIo
O No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑.No
25, were,any additional problems noted which cause nuncompuance of the rermttr
No.violations or deficiencies were noted daring this,visit.` You:will receive -no further
correspondence ahoutthis:visit:
a -ram.--- Avg 4V
I
❑ Yes ❑' No
❑ Yes- ❑ No
:3 Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
A
Reviewer/inspector 5ignatare: .,ter ,/ Date: `� 6)/ �7