920007_PERMIT FILE_20171231

N411unn JuJuaWuoJIAu3 jo juatupedaa

iMAiPS,
C'd
V,C .
r.
W. 4.4
. )a
T owner
aaddress
uuui parcel num
account num
intersection
# buffer
Olegend
Olayers
0�5ssft
Real Estate Data
and Revenue
Department
Register of
Deeds BOOKS!
1,AN+1'11 ('0DFS:
Raleigh Zoning
Info
Soils Legend
http://iniaps.co.wake.nc.tis/imaps/map.asp'?cmd=REFRESH&msize=
SUR V a ON 'i :) WHAT'S NEW
FAQ
Parcel Number: 2706485211
SELECT A VIEW
Environmental Features
1999 Color Orthophotography
1999 BNV Orthophotography
County Zoning
Copyright 2002. City of Raleigh & Wake County
I of 1 2/5/2004 9:18 AM

�..iNUIP5 ►
http://imaps. co.wake. ne.us/imaps/map.asp?cmd=PANS OUTH&nisiz...
66 0i 1J
* (2
4) owner
address
urns parcel num
account num
intersection
buffer
legend
Qlayers
0 � 283 ft
Real Estate Data
and Revenue
Department
Register of
Deeds BOOKS!
LAYER CODFIS:
Raleigh Zoning
Info
Soils Legend
cr
GRnw, -,
SURVEY SAY 6
FAQ
Parcel Number: 2706485211
Lr
RI I
SELECT A VIEW
Property
Environmental Features
1999 Color Orthophotography
1999 BIW Orthophotography
County Zoning
Copyright 2002. City of Raleigh & Wake County
WHAT'S NEW
1 of 1
2/5/2004 9:19 AM

Pippin Hog Farm
U
SR#2337
&ea.�►'d
am �
0.6 0 0.6 1.2 Miles
Lagoon-shP
Natl. Hwy. Sys- (Primary Roads)
N Blue Ridge Parkway (Federal)
/u Interstate
us
NC
SR
City
Other
Proposed
Roads (100k TIGER w/ attributes)
Pipe,Transmisslon & Airports (100k)
IV Hydro - RiveralStreams (100k)
Hydro -Water Bodies (100k)
Hydro - Major RhrerslStraams (100k)
Hydro -Major Water Bodies (100k)

3td3. B U 344.2
! 348.5 r 23�
322. 1 1 1�
i
324 S
0
351 ..I � .
o
is on
467 0 L
346. 7 L. 8RA
336.0 ° 437 \ \
0
386.1
132116(
345.8
0
347.0
59
10.8<R
1314
346.9 29: 20A
0
6170
43.9
O.
7 \ 3�
668
9\
668 �\290 0
15 343.0 27.3
0.g7A •—�"
0564 i2G 329.
z
$ 0. g9A
'n 0430 J? �� 5.2
3S1
1'
350,
0
353.0
0
Sl.➢

1':'i
1's i - o,E-•`li"t{litFa:• ,,•° •• tF[ i�„t€i !€ t •R9@S 9 I 9 a `d's S' t 7' , , 't 4 a %1 1 � i - ; t3:c 4
1'� i; iii? i 4 : i, 11 E E i 1, iP Ili O11
j$ j;De,f6 EIN!R 6 ',,i
til4 k I#�3111'litI"i3,iiftM 11,3iiltgg 14 d 3 4 � � � ,lE S �S� "� � _ €l ' � ° � E�€� ` �' ( g�; 5
§a9Q.therA Q11C I i € IEEE! $ I°III € :aiiii Iil i'i9i€ j tE Ell
yg S=;EiEr,?!91�!i?;!�51�� E€ } ;
6i1ll i€ ., t i i€ : =i j� .3 l; 1 ,i
(� ni n55t;�1� i f� i�i �435551tili��lil .11 f�1{s�IFlist�SIIi?t��;13 5i5It3�i�1313111iN,itPiliilililiiiiit`s:i�tiNtltlpNl iB�t 53, u%,€ts�i!I tVMU, � ;,
hype of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Fallow up p Emergency Notification p Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 11/20/2040 Time: 13:15 Printed on: 12/21/2000
ro-M-711perational p Below Thres o
p Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 2011.99.8."•"'
FarmName: Calvin 111ptp a.lFarm............ ........ ................................................................ County: Wake .................................................. RRO............
Owner Name:.Calyin.................................... Pippin ......................................................... Phone No: 9.19,-.269,-A14fa ..........................................................
Facility Contact: .......................................... ......Title: . Phone No:
Mailing Address: 9721.21ppin.11d.......................................•.........................................•... Zebuloa.,NC........................................... ................ Z759.7 ..............
Onsite Representative: aa.as,Aho.ve............................................................................ Integrator: lrutlep►eadeW................ ................................. ......... -
Certified Operator: Cal.via.................................... Pippin...........,.................................... Operator Certification Number: 1913z.............................
Location of Farm:
a e 1-40 W to US 701 N Exit at Newton Grove, follow US 701 N to 1-95 intersection, follow 1-95 N to Selma Exit
Pickup US 301 N out of Selma and to 1.0 mile out of town and bear Lt. onto NC 39N follow NC 39 N into Wake Co. to w
Ig Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude ©« ©• ®�� Longitude ®• ®' 011
11"I ''' ; u sur ace rains resent Lagoon rea pray FieldArea
Number of Lagoons , ❑ ❑ t; ❑ p Y
0 Liquia waste ivlanagement Nystenl
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) []Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes eg No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ...............8.6............................................................................................................................................................ ...................................
S/RIl Cantitruod art hark

5100 Continued on back
Facility Number: 92-7 1 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 12/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes Ig No
p Yes Ig No
© Yes ® No
12. "Crop type Fescue (Graze) Wheat Soybeans
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
G.'Na.vitil�itions'or'cieficieucres.we e'uute[i'cluring.thisvisit.'1�ou'w' ill'receivtrnafurther
• corresp6ndek6. Obirt this:visiC • ........... . ....................... .
p Yes []No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
[)Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
© Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
ilia' ems.. , ti 3�k'3i i a¢i�{ �1 r�e.��F.�il>�.�i. �➢�at ��j17�15�..,�3�S3i i An.. �� � i.1�3.a,9 3 c..6 � {„€ t ,.'.ldis c:1�tf F��� � �c..B i f `�� 9, i ia� h �R�i;s � E � ' J : I r€E:, � ..'. Reviewer/[ nsneeto r Sienature: Date: Cron

I
w
6 .1 >><IM - EiE�
{ E• i ;I!�3 I iI s Ikb I bi¢ t Y , ! 4 i 1 d 4 t ,9;};i 3>> > a3; �s �9iP€§€r€1t€ . t.c �€�€€c€�
�;1>?I E�iE ilivisioniofVater unlit:
��'� , ,�� Division oi' Soil�and Water. Conservation € _� u �° � E° }=s�CCii ;
fill 161,
ul:, l ii 1i I111111MMIMUMMI Ilii !t,un ;al lilt€ t € �a ; €sisir if r l
F
pe of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
eason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of V 1 s i t 50/3012002 Time:
Facility Number I:00 pm
of Operational p Below Thre o
p Permitted N Certified 13 Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 2Ju19Q.8.......
Farm Name: Calvin Pippin Farm County: Wake .................................................. RRO............
Owner Name: Calvin Pippin Plione No: 919-269-4246
Mailing Address: 9'I2.1.Plppia.Rd.........................:........................................................... Zeb.uloxk..NC .......................................................... 2,759.7 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:................. .. Phone No: ................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: ................ ....................... •. Integrator:
.....................................................................
Certified Operator: Cal.vanX............................... P.ippin............................................... Operator Certification Number: 19.13.2.............................
Location of Farm:
Fake 1-40 W to US 701 N Exitat Newton Grove, follow US 701 IN to 1-95 intersection, follow 1-95 N to Selma Exit
pickup US 301 N out of Selma and to 1.0 mile out of town and bear Lt. onto NC 39N follow NC 39 N into Wake Co. to
® Swine ❑ Poultry p Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 1 39• ©� ®« Longitude ®° ®' ©'
p can to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Fee er
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes. ® No
Discharge originated at: © Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) © Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) © Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? []Yes ® No
Waste Collection $t Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? © Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............... pxi............... ................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches)...1.4Si.................................................................................................................................................................................................
05103101 Continued

05103101
Facility Number: 92_7
Date of Inspection
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Ig No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload []Yes ® No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops iffer with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ig No
p Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
© Yes H No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes ® No
© Yes H No
IN o violations or deficiencies were noted urmg this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
>,�>, ,
Comments [[reter�to'("�uestian # nlatnjany7, YESganswers andlar an ':"hccorninentlatians ar: art 36other coroiitents. #i, 3� tl; , § i@!.,.,,9i:,
J €j§
�L it" 5 f
YS q3 t { 8. 713i3i39�$2ia39;I3.!,i�i8i»i�'tvF iF4<ssitEt6SiEElii'_'!iE.,..ieli:y�l',{�liitf9{i{i f931.itli lv4)el>�3iE��F4!ill SFCt�E4§iial� f E1t�..i�.���k"d1SYA1�t.LHl�liei.YIE'1.!4€��id:l6���Y�9
Clse drawlri sbf facilrt to better'ex tarn s�tuationsuse addrtronal a es as necessa c 4. _ - ;s• '''
PEiYY� f
4{,pp6.ii e�,99.;, ge{{ t�¢ y _@ ,.,, , }}-yy:y= i,.
. �.yy{j�jF,3S3�9 Sij�}� l.�il�1d. 31.9 �6j:jp{{j 3{$j1$j'3iF.6E6E@q€e9j}j`j, 11E;.? i 3iYl@?ipj}�{i Fjj§ �{€ESE i pe¢4€$ €$j{[g. 94�389�i@9jj} ' i i E } ' 7ylftd t6,g6fg6{{ ,�51i 6C1j 4Ykk.c? i S 6 ® Yy ❑ ,;. EeF[i:.5. i.�
11
}@EI.,41 Syi$9Eytld !, @i
436Ee54`'SIS'aa3iail9fii@@q%.i1�64ykFS.1!.fB€5ia3��1�i6i3Liil�a}:[i{{711{�3€E,
iit11:@;::'.�•ti@b:'z'-€iFi{SFit{!�i@F i_ ¢( It,Es,<. rr,,,${i .:{ 4 .. , y LSD �i4.drli¢4.`i1Z9 t3BiFaiEE1
Facility has not been operational since 1998. This facility's lagoon is in approx. 80 % closed. The majority of the liquid waste has been
applied to adjacient fields. Currently, the owner is working with Wake County Soil and Water during this closure. When weather
conditions permit the owner plans to land apply the remaining sludge. Highly recommend a new waste (sludge) sample should be taken
before application begins. Removal confirmation was requested by the owner.
Reviewer/Inspector Name l77DA,-Ci't.Ci r ::,St ;{ �F6 ,'• y@p;,�4 ]3,�t3 L.a!�yt!�a'§ 16 ' ` i`'`[€`i{ g,�iE, 3si3� ' -
43t�r 3
9F j 3P6 E
PB.t
LE9li1. t E.E;Eu F •W4 .4y¢1
. LFb3 i' ;4 aif S
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

(Type of Visit OCompllance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit A(Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit:
© Permitted 0 Cer�tiffiied• © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
FarmName: ......� ! �......IEM4......... IEW t .................................................
OwnerName:...... caiiGF.tti!1.........flytVAI.................................................................
tZ ! O! Time:
of Operational O Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County:......" ...................................
Phone No: ..... .z�9 ...y ..V....(iq I
FacilityContact:............................................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .................................... �Z P'.w.............................................................. ..Ze9�,....C-....................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: .............................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
PIS'W"Ine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
� E r Po ulation`,. C� f� Curxt
Desi Current CDp gn
Swltno ; Poult Cattle'
Ca apse Pa uiatlon ty p paclty':�;Popislation'i�.
❑ Wean to Feeder
gFeeder to Finish
10D p
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
�i Il'l1_aver
1 Nuionher of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present 1p Lagoon Area JE3Spray Field Area .`
4 Holding Pouds'/ SolidVaps',. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [21�o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes olio
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ...... P ..............................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 'f D
5/00
❑ Yes P190
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes O-No
❑ Yes ONo
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: 1'2, — Date of Inspection 7
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes WNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ,P"No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes .CI No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? []Yes ZrNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes E No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ;no
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes Q'Ko
5100

acility Number: L= ? 1 Date of Inspection Il L1l l ,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑Yes
�No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
l—
�No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
No
12. Crop type e__
13. Do the recei •ng crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
eNo .
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? a
❑ Yes
d No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Qf No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Required Records & Documents C
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
o
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ YestNo
o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
JdNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
P'No
4 Y�Q1 �Q�s;off dgfic�eit ie$ ry re 1�Ate� �t t � wi.......o -'
r
..... ....
cories' oridence' about: this visit:
dirawlgs,'o[ fa+lity to better eaiplain`situstians" (use additlgal pagesst3neeessaiy) `F';�.`'i`; '`j! k`S`�,�,�,<;,'s {"i33a�st<,',. r
�.- -- �a .- 1 9' 1 �37 1 i€YK; €i i -�"l .•_v fr •n•rr b `�*i �i �Sk t�s �i „�E ��� 11
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,y r _ _ Date: l a °/ 5/00

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] ReportNo: WO719O W
Grower: Pippin, Calvin Copies To: County Extension Director
9721 Pippin Rd. USDA -MRCS -Wake
r Zebulon, NC 27597
WsteAnaiysisRahort Farm:
3/23/01 Wake County
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results itsper million unless otherwise noted)
Sample !D:
N
P K Ca mg S
Fe Mn in
CU B
Mo CI C
U1G
-
Waste Code:
AES
Description:
Aerobic Liquid - Swine
Total 45.8
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
39.2 327 70.3 43.4 19.9
2.15 0.14 0.31
0.21 0.63
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pH SS C:N
OM% CCE% ALE K al
87.4 7.42
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop-
lbs11OOO gallons
Other Elements., _.:
= lbs11OO11 gallons -_
Application Method
Irrigation
N P205 K20
° 0.,19 P 0.52 2.6
Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn
0.41 0.25 0.12 0.01 T T
CU B Mo CI
T T
Na. .. Ni .
0.73
Cd Pb- `' Al Se Li

r FAb
NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Report No: W01008 W
_ Grower: Pippin, Calvin Copies To:
9721 Pippin Rd.
Zebulon, NC 27597
} wsteAnaiysisRehort Farm:
816101
Wake County
Sample Info.
Laborato Results-(partspermillion unless otherwise noted
Sample to:
N
P K Ca MR
S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B
Ma C! C
Total 47.0
58.3 208 104 59.6
23.6 1.37 0.21 0.52
0.24 0.57
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
ALS
-NO3
Na Ni Cd Pb
Al Se Li PH
SS C:N
DM% CCE% ALE K ai
75.0
6.58
Description:
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Li .
Urea
Recomrhendations:--_
Nutrients,Available.for First Cro ... ,
., ._ lbs/1000. allons'
C±ther Elements
-IbS11000 allons
Application Method
N P?05 K20
Ca - Mg S Fe Mn
Zn Cu. B Mo Cl
Na Nr
Cd- Pb AI - Se Li
Irrigation
Oi20 0.78 1.7
0.61 0.35 0.14 0.01 T
T T T
0.633
r3
the pH of the lagoon liquid is below the ideal range for bacterial action and waste treatment. Gradually adjust pH by adding 1 lb. of agricultural lime per 1000 cu. ft.,of liquid remaining irrthe_ lagoon xSample the lagoon
nonthl and continue to adjust pH until it is within the desired ran e of 7.0-8.0. -
rE— (). =2-O

Print map
IittpWmaps.espedia.com/pub+ag4nt.dII?gscr—ninipm
Print this page using the print function in your browser.
1O.Expedialc- Om -
Don't just ttava.Travol Right':
© 2000 Microsoft Corporation and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved.
© 2000 Navigation Technologies. All rights reserved.
© Copyright 2000 by AND Data B.V. All rights reserved.
© Copyright 2000 by Compusearch Micromarketing Data and Systems Ltd. All rights reserved.
O 2000 Geographic Data Technology, Inc. All rights reserved.
O 2000 Expedia, Inc. All rights reserved. Expedia.com terms of use Privacy po(icy
I or I 12'22.40 1 1:12 AAA

i
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
. NCDENR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 4, 1998
DAMES 13. Hutcri "•�•.' -;
GovEANak ��'"_ Mr. Calvin Pippin
9721 Pippin Road
Zebulon, North Carolina 27597
WAYNEMCDEVMr �.5 Subject: Notice of Deficiency
SECRETARY -'�•; Facility # 92-7
Calvin Pippin Farm
Wake County
7.
- Dear Mr. Pippin:
On October 23, 1998, Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
compliance inspection of the subject animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's
efforts to determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not -causing any adverse effects on
Waters of the State at the time of the inspection. However, a condition exists that requires
=_ your attention to comply with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan for your facility.
_
- No current waste analysis was available during the inspection. A waste analysis of
the lagoon must be made within a period of 60 days before or 60 days after the
1 application of swine waste.
Please respond in writing to this office, within 30 days of receipt of this Ietter, outlining your
t - r plans to correct this condition.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any
questions regarding this inspection please call Charles Alvarez at [phone].
7,1017
SSincerel
r Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Wake County Health Department
--m f. Larry Petrovick, Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
RRO Files
3800 BARRITT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27009
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
'�} �'` '" •''" "'•';'`''`'`1°•=`
�.�aV
AN EgUAL OPra RTUNITY /AFPIR NATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • 5096 RECYCLEa/10% PO>aT•CONOU M ER PAPER
•-�� �'V taw
.r...• .�' ice-.-e....�'4_i�••

•
V\010�'per
November 12, 1998
Calvin Pippin
9721 Pippin Rd.
Zebulon, NC 27597
Facility # 92-7
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
NCDENR
3800 Barrett Dr.
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Schuster,
•
I received your letter referencing Mr. Alvarez's visit to my hog facility today,
November 12, 1998 and am happy to respond that I have already gotten a waste
analysis report for my lagoon. I am enclosing a copy of that report for your records.
I do apologize for overlooking my responsibility to get a waste analysis report
during the time of applying my lagoon water. I will be sure to have regular analysis done
on my lagoon in the future.
Si cerely,
Calvin Pippin

NCDX - _nom�c Drvtsia'- Wkeed Cre&,Md' Ralei NC 27607 465 w 9 9 733,=2655:� x. _ :. �z� �mw.. �::_ � T Re or ii ;-W0226
_ . ,. 3 � , .,.. � _ . � ova 9�.
Grower. Pippin, Calvin
Copies To: County Extension Director
:uW
9721 Pippin Rd.
Zebulon, NC 27597
USDA-NRCS-Wake
"
rite Analysis Rollort Farm:
10/2"8
Wake County
..._ Y '.�.;: ...y�. .A'
Sam le`In#o %
.y... T>.s,:- ev.. ,.t c.;:::Y:-..�:iiHf!'ia-...':;:
Lahorato Resalts-. arts: r mi idtkinless otherwise noted ys .r am x a
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B Mo Cl C
-
Total 280 M
55.9 636 111 47.2 31.3 2.22 0.24 0.39
0.13 0.67
IN -N
M M M H H M M M
L M
Waste Code:
NH4
Na Ni Cd A Al Se Li pH
SS C.N DM% CCE% ALE*
ALS
-NO3
Description:
OR-N
167 7.84
Swine Lagoon Li .
Urea
M '
h+#�.ut ...:._°.�.k',Y a1"< n •M"T...r.
Recommendations.
... �y °..a� m., 9e� a>'n; F w...:" :se
�.v'v, .,,::,,ESL 'mv.3 yam..-.x • •-.r;r^+..:,y. - -.,o : &a. pS' .'.� -
x . Nutrients4Avajlable 01FIrst>Cro r_. x�� - ��16s/IODO,�ff allons ��;�!
" "
0#her'- Elemeu#s� m� lbsl1000�"�`allmts
v
•

V&oE�'pev
0
0
SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
1. Proposed Subdivision
Proposal to subdivide the entirery of a 19.1 acre parcel and the west -central portion of a 174 acre parcel (64,80
acres in total for the proposed subdivision), zoned R-40 situated on the north side of Pippin Road, west of Shepard
School Road into 6S lots.
File & Name
S-11-99 WAKEFIELD MEADOWS
Plat prepared by and for: 0 ld 14at- a-q-t-
Robert C. Williams for LJ:lJe4-s
Acreage 261t -
64.80 Acres (totaled.from 2 parcels)
Average lot size
0.87 acres (37,897 sq: ft.)
Access Road
Pippin Road (Not on T-Plan)
2. Staffs Recommendation
PIN
2706.01-37-6170, plus
portion:-48-0477
Zoning:
R-30
Number of Lots Proposed
65
Utilities
Individual Wells and
Individual Septic Tanks
Internal Roads
Yes, proposed to be Public
This is the same plan that was considered and denied at the last meeting. Since that
meeting, the land planner has provided soils information that indicates that the Barrow
property to the southwest of the site cannot be developed with more than eleven lots,
and therefore according to Sec. 3-4-8 (2)(D)of the, subdivision regulations should not
require a public road stub to that property. In light of this, the proposed plan generally
complies with the standards of the Subdivision Regulations, staff recommends
approval subject to the following condition:
1. Stub roads into adjoining properties will need to' have at least 4 lots fronting
them in order for NCDOT to accept maintenance responsibility.
3. Subdivision Review Committee's Recommendation

12/?6/1997 18:07 9192501058 WAKE SWCD/USDA NRCS
PAGE 04 ?
3 h x ;tRDSWC Animal FeedlotOperation Review
aX
�'•ii .'
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site ct Inspe
J, 10n ,. '"`YL•;'{+�,{h,n 1'�e..7.} �k.. , a�kY ` i
.�.'xa` 6 ? ,�v �' w,�:ti �^ ,,.�:.;� - r. . •r} ,:So �� ��� . �+flt
r Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow-ug or 5we ins tvtion Q Follow-up of I)SWC review O Other
Date` of l:tcpt:etion
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: CiRegistered Q Applied for Permit tcx:1..'_3 for I hr 15 ruin)) Spirit on Review
❑ C.erti ed 0 Permitted or inspection (includes travel and processing) ;
10 Not O 3erttioaal Date Last Operated: ..............................................................................................................
Farm Name -
Owner ...--..,... [;t►untV: � i .........
9 - S11.7
� C414
Oweer Ngmc� - Phone
.....,..�%.1��%......i��i!!).....---•-••.............................................................L...... !v�►:...............,.. .....................,,,..........-...........
Facility Contact:....(�m---- PIP114)....................................... Title:.......................... Phone `o:..On.)..,��
Mailing Addrest:........- 7z1. .. 1p �/!r.,... �............. �1�%A �.... ..............,. 2.�5 y........... ...-........... ......... ........................ ......... ...........
........... .
Onsite Representative:Integrator:.. "..........CW.pa.....� .............. I
,
Certified nperator:........... ffALV .................................... Operutur Certificution Numher:,..lrlY.1!!W4..................
Location of Darin:
Latitudr • , I J"
Type of Operation
Swine
Design Current
Capacity, Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Lrop
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
Longitude l ��' 1 1 64
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer ! ....
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
a
.......................... .
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Populatioti
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Number of Lagoons / Folding Ponds 10 Subsurface Drains Present 00 l,ag mn Area
General
1. are there any butters that need maintenance/improvement'
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation:'
Di.:charge nriginated at: ❑ Lagoon. ❑ Sprtiy Field it Other
a. 1(dischara:c is observed, was the conveyan�Ce than -made?
h. if cli�cltarse is oba:r�cd, did it reach Surt;�cc Wnt�rY, f If-ycs. notify D1VQ)
c. If &i ih:ir,c is observed, what is the estimated t]ow in gal/min?
d. Doc di. -;charge hypaxs a lagoon syktctn? (If yes. notify DWQ)
i
I
3• Is there evidence of putt (1kc:harge from any part of the operation?
4. Wet there any adverse irnpacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the wa.;tc management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/i m p ro ve me n t '
-4/30/97
lU Spray Field Area I :�
❑ Yes to No
❑ Yes CM No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Ye"
CI No
HYes
❑ No
❑ yes
® No
Wye.,
$1 \o

A2416/1997 18:07 9192501058 WAKE SWCD/USDA MRCS
' Facility plumber: 2 —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback c 'iteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (I.attanns andjor Holding ] onds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft))a:� }Structure I Structure 2 Stricture 3 Structure 4
ITb )V file &l ,`,4:�.. �' .—........... —
............... I...._..................' ............. ....i........I.....................:.. ...
f Pelt s Ptlild� 7o Ael. 3.3 F�'.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
PAGE
05
4S;
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No s
i
[ Yes
No
Tj
❑ Yes
No
;i
Structure S
Structure 6
❑ Yes
0 No
I L is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? - El Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimpiovement? Yes_ ❑ No
--
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses-
- an lmtnediate public health or environmental threat, inotify DWQ) - - -
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP. or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crap tYFc 1' GU I".4� hif....� f....,.................................... ............... .,...... ..,.,........................ ............ ......................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in theI Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?--
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipmenO
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/luspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? Lj. 1,0*4
For Certified 1+acitities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Cerdfied AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
Iwq-
12/ V 20a... b�ty�g7 .a� ►��k�4y. •�
ad w Atli ti 41AL&
1, Pw�
r,
❑ Yes ONO
[] Yes M No
❑ Yes [% No
❑ Yes ti No
- ❑ Ycs_ No
0 Yes No '
C6 Yes 0 No
,Yes © No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes . ❑ No .
0 Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/In-s
spec t >r Name
t t• -,, .,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Q
cc: ' Divisio» of Water Quality, Water Quality Seetion, Facility Assessment U.tit 4/30/97
I -

Facility Number I I Date of Inspection ;/ &�
Time of Inspection tZOo 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Registered ❑ Non -Registered ❑ Inactive Facility Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ............_..._... !.P ................F ' "� County:...........w .
......................................_....... -.....:.........................................
Owner Name:
Facility Contact: ...... . ......................................................................Title:
MailingAddress: .................................... ..................... ...........................
Onsite Representative: ................... ...........................................................
CertifiedOperator: ................................................... ....... ..........................
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
1 Design Current Design Current Design Current
El Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle
Capacity Population Capacity Population Capacity Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feede: ❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
aFeeder to Finish I❑ Non -Laver I❑Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean . -
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other -
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity,
❑ Gilts _ -
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons- ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Sprayfield Area
Holding.Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at lagoon:
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? W'yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ i
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? .
:. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a dischar_e?
�� Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure ;
Identifier:
Freeboard (inchcsl: C�
..........................
❑ Yes 2No
❑ Yes YNo
❑ Yes D No
❑ Yes 2No
❑ Yes 2'No
❑ Yes 2 No
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
1/"/00

Latitude S 1 ,� 3 Longitude
5. Waste Last Added (mm/dd/yy)
lu
6. Estimate of lagoon surface area (acres)
7. Height of Embankment (feet)
S. Distance to Blue Line Stream (feet) S00 f
9. Distance to down gradient well without intervening stream (feet) `7$;
10. Distance to WS waters or HQW (miles)
11. Located within 100 year floodplain (Y/N) p Yes IPXo
12. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
a. Sludge Near Surface El
b. Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
c. Lagoon Liquid Clear
13. Embankment Condition
a. Poorly Built, Trees, Stumps, Erosion Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, etc.
b. Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition ®/
c. Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
14. Outside Drainage Area
a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
b. Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
c. No Drainage Area or Diversion Well Maintained
15. Liner Status
a. High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, etc.
b. No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
c. Meets Current NRCS Liner Requirements
17. Management to Prevent Overflow
a. Liquid Level less than 12 inches from Top of Dike OR Liquid Level less 11
than 18 inches and No Sprayfield or Application Equipment Available.
b. Liquid Level Greater than 18 inches from Top of Dike with No Application 0
Equipment and/or Sprayfield Available OR Liquid Level Between 12 and
18 inches with Application Equipment and Sprayfield Available.
c. Liquid Level Greater than 18 inches from Top of Dike. ©/
Application Equipment and Sprayfield Available
18. Was contact made with on -site representative: p Yes el�o
19. Does lagoon require follow-up: 0 Yes ©-Ko

V.M
Comments (Refer to Question #): Explain any Yes answer and/or any other comment.
Sketch of Site:
�oCtSGS
Name:
Signature:

'Divisi'on of Soil and Water�Cotiservation 'Operation Rew�ew
i i EIE li ,- , ;�y'Cp,-'tlnI C.o� n plQ D d oI a'nCe I,nS-peetlol
pIii.�� �VliW
:(
t
Q Oder Agency Operation Review bi tr z ;
h.,
outine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection l 2- 15' 9--/
Time of Inspectiou ob 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted [Certified © Conditionally Certified [] Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
h,:? °it1W Sri i 7 II SS
Farm Name:_: County: LN.`......................................................
Owner Name:
........ L..13.I.f�.c?t!................................ '. .Al..................................... Phone No . .......... Z�A t.......:���..�.......................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
C nr
Mailing Address: ........ .C(-7:.�:.?...........r.:a��'�r...../�.:................................................ ...........Z...{'...btt s1.........................10 (f............... .. .5`�d.. .
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.........t(. .......... .........:�P��J Operator Certification Number: ......................................................................................................
Location of Farm:
J
......................................................................... ... I..".., ............................................................................................................ ... .............. ....
- J
Latitude • ' Longitude • 4 44
"1,`� '� ,Design Current �'� �� ' ;Design ° `Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
)C o
d
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
;' ❑ Layer
❑ Non -I
❑ Other
� in �};a� Nu>tilber,Of I,agOOIIs•. �r.. �3ul��i�
Holding,Pon'ds / Solid Traps
per `. 10 Non -Dairy
17., i 4 n.
Design Gapac'ity
Total S.SLW
�C
Subsurface Drains Present In Lagoon Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
Spray Field Area
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ffNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes dNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [I/No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/tnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ffNo
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [Z/No
(ere there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ['No
Collection & Treatment
gage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes [�No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
.tier:
....... .. I...............................................................................................................................................................................................
Mediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes dNo
seepage, etc.)
Continued on back

9acility Number: 9 Z -- Dale of inspection l 2 !S-
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes O/No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify_ DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes r;;r'No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Eg"No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes [10
Waste ADD11CatiOn
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
B No
11.
'Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
[(No
12.
Crop type ---.� 1 �. icr . f�� 4«a _ prC,
13.
Do the receivingcrops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan CAWMP
p g g { ).
El Yes
,_' /N
I„]!'t�o
14,
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
O No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
o
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
YN 0
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
C944o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes'
❑-No
Refired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
E(No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
,—,,�wT
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
El Yes
Yo
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
DIo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
EY&O
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
lgfio
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Yes
[�No
(ie/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
❑
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
011Yes
[I No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Mt No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
R&O
Rio yiWhtigris'or• ddiderteies Were note#, dialing �his;visit. • :Y:o.WWHI-feeeiye Rio furthg�
corres 'fideike: abbot. this :visit.: - - - - ' . ' . ' . - : ' . ' . ' - - - '
Comments refer to ueshon # x lam ter .,
( q ` ' ) E p any YES answers and/or arsy recotinmenAa66ns or any, other comments l
q
Clseldrawtit s of factLt to lietter,ez lain srtuatt`nnst`(use acldit,onal'` a` i s as necessa'' i $ +tf i':;sa; 13�it,,s 61 1 398a`,.l
�
i f i 1,
P. g )r � �
>dl 6
''�:
- •tra3a .stilt:-c=e ,ate . f
�1Nir.�ai 11�1c kq k I& Ft spar v( ��yoeN aetdr 7� J)eVP/*�re,r.
N L) i ,v, m e ci rq 4'. re-, a IeL r � r k 4 /14 r-e- ,
�a [ c i� I< y �4s IUd )1 Js Of
J-tJ Vj.1 rj Ct e Jog- k r 'L P �4 A? '
I
23• Will c.,11 Mr. App N W 1+.
�'�
Reviewer/Inspector Namef"•�,.
Reviewer/]nspector Signature. +A„4, A11,, , Date. 1 Z hS- 9q
3/23/99

. ;Facility Number: e3 2 — 7- Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
Eg-Ko
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
3<0
2$. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
2<0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
3 No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e'. broken fan belts, missing or
broken fan blade(s), inoperable
ff NVN
or shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
No
3/23/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
E)P.H.NFR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 14, 1997
Mr. Calvin Pippin
9721 Pippin Road
Zebulon, North Carolina 27597
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 92.-7
Pippin Swine Farm
Wake County
Dear Mr. Pippin.:
On August 8, 1997, Mr. Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. The inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that your swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that your waste
lagoons had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the
inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal waste nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation and
compliance. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Mr. Charles Alvarez at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy G r ,
��' Water Qual y Section Supervisor
cc: Wake County Health Department
Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC•-RRO
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, NW,
•FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Vf An Equal OpportUnity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/ I Tlo post -consumer paper

Facility Number �!2
Date of Inspection$ -
Time of Inspection ! iOD 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: El Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:L25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted I or Inspection includes travel and processinQ
❑ Notl Operational Date Last Operated: ...............................................................................................................................................
Farm Name:...... Ca..l ............ :.040.4.!O................. r 3.................................... County: ..................
............................................ .......................
Land Owner Name:.....S..F�.�.v.+. tii.......... ........ P ..."1........................................... Phone Na:.......zQ.b......, /,z y............................................
Facility Conctact.........� ...... ... ;................. �........................ Title:........ 5.�d � .................. Phone No:..... :.............. ....................
MailingAddress: ......... c.y2.�............:.�,? ^ ................................................... z�.r�wdar........./...,..............f........................... .27S�L�`
Onsite Representative:..........�..�.1? :N............. '%rn•"'............................................ . Integrator: ......... 1..:jhArp
..................................................
CertifiedOperator:... . L u................................................................... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
.�.......2..................N................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
� ..�?...........�4 a................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4D
Latitude • Longitude �• �+ ��
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General ,_,/
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes BNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes G No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes /No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes BN_10
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 2<0
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2<0
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes W1,10
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 9 No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

FociRty Number:. z .............
M
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
�[�i0
1. II<O
Str ctn res ([ azaons and/.or_1Iolding _Qttds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
�. b..... ............................ ............................ ............................
........................
............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
8'<o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
B<O
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
2N0
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ............tiut..........................u o...................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
f
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
0 0
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
[ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ErNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ErNo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
B<o
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
El Yes
❑ No
Commentsf(refer to, question #) Explain any YES answers" yand/or any recommendations�or any, other comments k �
se:drawings,of facility to betterexplamaituations (useaddihonal pages„as necessary)
n
two houSzs
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C Date: q`
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

❑ Dion of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other 1
Facility Number q T
Registered Certified 13 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted
Farm Name:.....` .f.y..`..�. , N I L
Owner Name: C` ^' .�'
Date of inspection
Time of Inspection �24 hr. (hh:mm)
1Not Operational I Date Last Operated :.................
....... County: ....................... z� r...........................................
PhoneNo:...................................................................
Facility Contact: .......... :.................................................................... Title:........................ ..... Phone No:
......................................................................................
Mailing�Address:......�t.i'Zi..............�.:��.:.".:..........��......................................... ..... ....�o�'...:................. �.�.......................2.......'...y..
Onsite Representative:................... n/ ... ....`.I� �.'' ..... h %}.... Y............: `..'... rY.............. ............ C �................. Into rator......... '�. r �'� f"9 "2
Certified Operator;............ u �.......... Operator Certification Number; ....................
Location of Farm:
c
'c
Latitude ' 04 44 Longitude • 4 "
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes�/No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes LJ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other _
a. If discharge, is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes dNNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [3/No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes O No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes dNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [Z No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes WNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ONo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes dN0
7/25/97

Number: q 2-
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures jLagoons.tiolding Ponds Flush Pits etc.'
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier:
......................................................................
Freeboard (ft): .............0
........................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes a<o
❑ Yes P1Y°
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
............................................................................................................
❑ Yes 93�No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
EKNo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
EYNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
E2 No
Waste Application
�/
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
[3 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
r
Crop type ............L010111....... ... .......:...... .TA Fe L�c4c�............................. ;scu.fr Y.................................
16.
Do differ designated in Animal Waste
the receiving crops with those the Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
o
_,,N
No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
U<O
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
ElYes
[j/No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
L`tf No
21.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[9No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
ErNo
11'<'or Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0-No.violkionsor. deftciencies.were-noted-duringthis.visit.•_You:will receive•irO'Airt�her':
cO&O06ixdep6e A oitt this: visit~:- '
Lj
(Awe- J.,&�e
Nob Al 0 wu,54.
❑ Yes OeNo
❑ Yes E�No
❑ Yes allo
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name f� a
,gyj��C ,�k .4., Gt .�. .�.�..= ::w ',� i ' �:a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2 L `�

November 12, 1998
Calvin Pippin
9721 Pippin Rd.
Zebulon, NC 27597
Facility # 92-7
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
NCDENR
3800 Barrett Dr.
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Schuster,
r
NOV 16 1908 x
i P+Lf;it'IR PALEIGii `EGIDia,?� OffIGE
I received your letter referencing Mr. Alvarez's visit to my hog facility today,
November 12, 1998 and am happy to respond that I have already gotten a waste
analysis report for my lagoon. I am enclosing a copy of that report for your records.
do apologize for overlooking my responsibility to get a waste analysis report
during the time of applying my lagoon water. I will be sure to have regular analysis done
on my lagoon in the future.
Si cerely,
Calvin Pippin

NCDVan— i 33!6 s
r WRe rtNo
Grower: Pippin, Calvin
Copies To: County Eidension Director
9721 Pippin Rd.
USDA NRCS-Wake
`.. Zebulon, NC 27597
Wste
•� m r.
szsy nal joh o1 L Farm:
10/29/98
CountyiMfDXMMWII:a�I(l�10
Resul
Mi-Wake
IlDH�Tn IOle Wi5Cii1Dlei -
Sample ID:
N
P R Ca M S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B Mo CI C
Total 280 M
55.9 636 111 47.2 31.3 2.22 0.24 0.39
0.13 0.67
INN
M M M H H M M M
L M
Waste Code:
NH4
AL5
-NO3
Na Ni Cd A Al Se Li pH
SS ON DM% CCE% ALE a
Description:
OR-N
167 7.84
Scene Lagoon Li .
Urea
M
Recomntendat�ans.
=-Nntrie
pia �"'�. u"�.'�MS
is Ava IableafDr.:IF�rst fi. ���I— 06-0 n rs W }
Od►ei Elements, lbsllOUD
scairrriMetbarlilrP205
Kz(?Ca
T'
:: S pew Mn.W Cum 13 Mo G W
�`1 m
4.�5 ��028 a�WC#.i8
WORSE �T.
mm £ Pb Li
W F

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources &6ja
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary 1DEEH.NF;Z
DIVISION OF WAr'ER QUALITY
August 14, 1997
Mr. Calvin Pippin
9721 Pippin Road
Zebulon, North Carolina 27597
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 92-7
Pippin Swine Farm
Wake County
Dear Mr. Pippin:
On August 8, 1997, Mr. Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. The inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the Staate's animal waste nondischarge
rules'.
The inspection determined that your swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that your waste
lagoons had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the
inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal waste nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation and
compliance. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Mr. Charles Alvarez at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy r r ,
Water Qual y Section Supervisor
cc: Wake County Health Department
Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms, Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Sulte 101, Ntif
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Cprolina 27609An Equol Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Calvin Pippin
Calvin Pippin Farm
9721 Pippin Rd
Zebulon NC 27597
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Calvin Pippin Farm
Facility ID#: 92-7
Wake County
Dear Mr. Pippin:
EDEEH N
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P ector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
awe,
P.O. Box 27687, W 0
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Nvf An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 60% recycled/101%o post -consumer paper

NCDAAgronomicDivision430OReedyCreekRoadRaleigh,NC27607-6465(919)733-2655 _ ReportNo:W06012 W v
Grower: Pippin,Calvin CopiesTo:
9721 PippinRd.
Zebulon,NC27597
Wste AnalysisR,P-h ort Farm:
2120102 Wake County
Sample Info.
Sample ID:
1
WasteCode:
ALS
Laborato ryResu Its (pa rtsperm i I I i onun I essotherwi senoted)
N I P K CO Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu 8 Mo CI C
Total
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
56.2 1 40.1 105 _ 92.3 48.1 25.6 2.54 0.23 1.36 0.20 0.36
I Na Ni CO Pb Ai _ SE Li ph _ SS _ _ C_h DM% CCE% ALE(Kgal
Description:
I OR-h
35.1
6.76
Swine Lagoon Liq.
! Urea
Recommendations:
NutrientsAvailableforFirstCrop
lbs11000 alions
OtherElements
lbs11000 allons
Application Methoo
F 5 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn
Zn
Cu
B Mo CI
Na Ni
Cd Pb Al Se Li
Broadcast
0.23 0 4 0.B4 0.54 0.28 0.15 0.01 T
0.01
T
T
0.29
ThepHofthelagoonliquidisbe eidealrangeforbacterialactionandwastetreatment.GraduallyadjustpHbyaddingllb.ofagriculturallimeper1000cu.ft.ofliquidremaininginthelagoon.Samplethelagoon
monthlyandcontinuetoadjustpHuntil itiswithinthedesired rangeof7.0-8.0.
Sample Info.
LaboratoryResults(partspermillionunlessotherwisenoted)
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca M
S
Fe Mn Zn
Cu B
Mo CI C
2
Total 461
431 150 528 248
102
96.2 7.41 21.4
14.4 0.60
IN -h
WasteCode:
-NH4
ALS
-NO3
Na Ni Cd Pb
Al
Se Li H
SS C:N
DM% CCE% ALE(K al}
Description:
OR-N
41.7
7.04
Swine Lagoon Liq.
Urea
Recommendations:
NutrientsAvailableforFirstCrop
Ibs11000 allons
OtherElements
Ibs11000 allons
Application Methoo
F205 K20 Ca My S Fe Mn
Zn
CU
b Mc C
Na Ni
Co Pb Aj SE Li
Broadcast
1.9 .8 1.2 3.1 1.5 0.59 0.56 0.04
0.14
0.10
T
0.35

NCDAAgronomicDivision4304ReedyCreekRoadRaleigh,NC27607-6465(919)733-2655 ReportNo:W07901 W
Grower: Pippin,Calvin _ CopiesTo:
9721 PippinRd.
Zebulon,NC27591
l
'Fy rwwi a-Wa.
4118102
Sample Info
Sample ID:
01
WasteCode:
ALS
ae Analysis RPlqlort- Farm:
l Wake County
LaboratoryResults(partsperm i I l ionunlessotherwisenoted)
N I P K Ca Mom_ S Fe Mn Zn
Total
IN -A
-NH4
-NOa
39.9 56.0 118 103 43.1 22.5 2.28 0.29 0.81 0.13 0.44
C
Na Ni Co Pb At Se b ph S5 C:h DM% CCE% ALE(Kgal)
Description: I OR h I 45.7 8.75
Swine Lagoon Liq. ` Urea
Recommendations: NutrientsAvailableforFirstCrop lbs17000 allons OtherElements lbs11000 allons
Application Methoa F205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo CI Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Irrigation U.-I-11)
0.75 0.95 0.60 0.25 0.13 0.01 T 0.01 T T 0.38
ThepHofthelagoonIiqui dishigherthan norma Ilyfoundi ntreatmentlagoons.TakefolI ow-upsa mplestodetermineifpHremai nshighoverti me.ContactaTechnicaI Special isttobesurethatthewastetreatment
systemi sworki ngproperly

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor.
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 6, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Calvin Pippin
Calvin Pippin Farm
9721 Pippin Rd
Zebulon NC 27597
Farm Number: 92 - 7
Dear Calvin Pippin:
W'A
IT
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Calvin Pippin Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner. or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions conceminu this letter, -please call Stephanie Milam at [phone] extension 544 or
Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
� �C`�,.
forFes` eK rr 1`."�evens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Calvin Pippin
Calvin Pippin Farm
9721 Pippin Rd
Zebulon NC 27597
Dear Calvin Pippin:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND.N.4TURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 - �±
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number--9.2:7t-
Wake.County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, ]RR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Wake County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

-1995 15:26 FROM DEN WATER CIUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.O2102
Site Requires Immediate .Atten�nn"
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPE"TIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 1995
Time: a : 0
Farm Name/Owner:a7lvll,t,�1 1 1\f Mailing Address: 7,_ t / -z—
County: CL(T
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: tkz �-i t Phone:
Physical Address/LocatiQn: UJ:i L19. 114S, T W LIT C
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: _ (. t\ 1 � _�nt ) LL— Number of Animals on Site: ` ' LE -
DEM Certification Number: ACE_ _� _ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' �` Longitude: 2 ` �_' . Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the A. innal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: �IFL. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the la oon(s)? Yes o ia' Was any erosion observed? Yes o 601,
Is adequate land available fo spray. Ye or No is the cover crop adequate? 6es or No
Crop(s) being utilized: _ `C-f�l��.t (`_�
Does the facility meet SCS mi imum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? es or No
100 Feet from Walls? , r No
-',e animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS blue Line Stream? Yes or e,
aaLnal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet or a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes oop�
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing sysietm, Or ether
.;irni,a.r man-made deigces? Yes or(9 lI Y-S, Please EXPLUn,
)firs It,u facility waintain adequate waste manage-MVIt recurds (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or,
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
10-� )
TOTAL P.02

IN,',
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENvIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 4, 1998
Mr. Calvin Pippin
9721 Pippin Road
Zebulon, North Carolina 27597
Subject; Notice of Deficiency
Facility # 92-7
Calvin Pippin Farm
Wake County
Dear Mr. Pippin:
On October 23, 1998, Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
compliance inspection of the subject animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's
efforts to determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not -causing any adverse effects on
Waters of the State at the time of the inspection. However, a condition exists that requires
your attention to comply with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan for your facility.
No current waste analysis was available during the inspection. A waste analysis of
the lagoon must be made within a period of 60 days before or 60 days after the
application of swine waste.
Please respond in writing to this office, within 30 days of receipt of this letter, outlining your
plans to correct this condition.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any
questions regarding this inspection please call Charles Alvarez at [phone].
Sincerel ,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Wake County Health Department
Larry Petrovick, Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
RRO Files
3600 BARR[TT DRIV6, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA,27609
PHONE [phone] PAX ato-571-6718
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / APPIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLED/1 0% PORT -CONSUMER PAPER

MapQuest Maps: map
Home Hell)
. L-. �- �"9721 Pippin Rd
L- Address Zebulon, NC
Air o 27597-7876, US
a
1 of 2
wysiwyg://15/http://www.mapquest.c ... GW
Map a New Location w Get. Directions To This' Location
I.J 1 1 d., �.,
�o ie CUCKING ON M". VAR: '()ZOOM In •* Re -center ().Move Location
urh av' M
ADDITIOMa MW FWURES: Customize Mao Add A Location
License/Co pyrl q h
M
9/19/02 12:02 PM

344.2
322.1
349. e ' U2
347.1
�. �43.2 v v 324 6
c351.1 ffJj
v343.
/
352.E 354.1386,0
f \
---------------
_ s2s.1
1
�2„/ "
' AI
-------------------------
1 ° I
345.5 \ i
345e2
349.2
345�5..
346. 9
i
3.
�\
43.3�
34a.1
\
2' r
5668
343.4
q2 r ,l
�.
:.
f
24
oa
l�
5405
1
o4aa
339.E

.�;\7
LAGOON CLOSURE PLAN FOR CALVIN PIPPIN FARM
Farm Name: Calvin Pippin Farm
Owner: Calvin Pippin
Facility #: 92-7
Operation: 1000 Feeder to Finish Swine
Location: Farm located at the intersection of Pippin Rd (SR 2337) and
Shepard School Rd. (SR 2406).
(See FSA Tract 63127)
Latitude: 35 / 51 / 42
Longitude: 78 / 18 / 35
Hydrological Code: 03020203010010
Receiving Waters: Moccasin Creek (G3)
GENERAL
Calvin Pippin was an integrator with Murphy Family Farms. He owned and operated a1000 feeder to
finish swine production facility. The swine operation had been in existence since 1980 when a 1.4
acre waste treatment lagoon was built. The maximum design treatment & storage capacity was for
1040 animals.
VOLUME OF WASTE TO BE REMOVED
Total liquid & sludge = 1,013,000 gallons
LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE
All waste will be applied at agronomic rates. Waste will be agitated, pumped, and spread over 77.7
acres of land. See attached map for location of fields. Refer to tables 1 and 2 for acres available for
application of waste and the hydrologic loading rates.
Table 1 Acres available to apply nitrogen
Tract # Field# Soil Type Crop Acres Lbs. N Utilized Months of Application

1
Table 2 Application of Waste
Tract # Field # Soil Type
SPECIFICATIONS
Crop Application Rate (inlhr) Application Amount (inches)
1. Waste will be applied in a manner not to exceed the crop nitrogen requirement as outlined
below.
2. All sludge will be removed from the lagoon. Fresh water may need to be added after the
lagoon is agitated and pumped out so that the sludge residue can be removed.
3. Closure of this operation must be done without any runoff of the effluent.
4.. Waste shall not be applied to saturated soils or during rainfall events.
5. Waste shall be applied to actively growing crops and no earlier than 30 days prior to planting a
crop.
6. Waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
7. All disturbed areas must be established in permanent vegetation according to NRCS
standards.
8. All grading when filling in lagoon should be done so that no ponding will take place and
necessary erosion control practices such as terraces or diversions must be installed where
necessary to prevent erosion before vegetation is established.
9. Only soil will be used to fill lagoon. No building debris should be buried in the lagoon.
10.All inlet and devices used to convey animal waste into the lagoon shall be removed before
filling the lagoon.
11. Contractor will keep records on number and amount of waste applied on each field. A copy of
records will be given to NRCS personnel after completion of job.
I agree to close out this lagoon according to the above plan that meets NRCS standards and
specifications.
Owner:
Waste Plan Prepared by;
Date;

10/22/2003
Subtotal
Subtotal
Total
Projected Land use for Lagoon Closure
Acres
33.2 Acre Field
4.1 Acre Field by house
4.2 Acre Field by lagoon
6.4 Acre Field in woods
2.8 Acre Field in woods
5.6 Acre Field at intersection
2.1 Acre Field behind shop
58.4
3.5 Acre pasture at Danny Rays
5.7 Acre pasture at Danny Rays
5.8 Acre field left side of Rd at Danny Rays
4.3 Acre field right side of Rd. at Danny Rays
19.3
77.7
Projected liquid and sludge to be pumped
950000 Gallons
12227 Gallons per acre
0.45 Inches per acre

10/22/2003
Irrigation Schedule for Pippin Farm Closure
Date Field #
Acres
Run Time GPM
Total Gallons N11000 gal
9/8/2000 133A1
4.5
420
145
60900
0.1
9/9/2000 63A2
3.1
360
145
52200
0.1
8/17/2000 H1
4.2
480
145
69600
0.1
8/2512000 H2
4.4
270
145
39150
0.1
9/11 /2000 B3A2
1.6
180
145
26100
0.1
9/12/2000 B3A3
4.1
360
145
52200
0.1
9/13/2000 133131
4.7
480
145
69600
0.1
10/5/2000 B381
4.7
390
145
56550
0.1
10/6/2000 133132
3.6
360
145
52200
0.1
10/1012000133132
1.2
240
135
32400
0.1
0
0
510900
36.1
Total N
Total N 1 ac
Acre inches
Lagoon Inches
6.09
1.35
0.49
1.6
5.22
1.68
0.61
1.4
6.96
1.66
0.60
1.9
3.92
0.89
0.32
1.1
2.61
1.63
0.59
0.7
5.22
1.27
0.46
1.4
6.96
1.48
0.54
1.9
5.66
1.20
0.44
1.5
5.22
1.45
0.53
1.4
3.24
2.70
0.98
0.9
0
#DIV10!
#DIV/0!
0.0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0.0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
0.0
51.09
1.42 Average N per acre
13.8
13.8

10/22/2003
Projected Land use for Lagoon Closure 12M2002
12/8/2002
1111=3
1/1212003
6/4/2003
615M03 7I1ir2ow 7/16/2003 Total
Ave per
acre
Acres
gallons
units N
33.2 Acre Field 199200
199200
30000 45000 473400
14259
5.13
4.1 Acre Field by house
24600
16000
40600
9902
3.56
4.2 Acre Field by lagoon
25200
19000
44200
10524
3.79
6.4 Acre Field in woods
38400
38400
18000 94800
14813
5.33
2.8 Acre Field in woods
16800
16800
15000 48600
17357
6.25
5.6 Acre Field at intersection
33600
33600
67200
12000
4.32
2.1 Acre Field behind shop
12600
12600
6000
2.16
Sub 58.4
3.5 Acre pasture at Danny Rays 21000
21000
42000
12000
4.32
5.7 Acre pasture at Danny Rays
34200
34200
68400
12000
4.32
5.8 Acre field left side of Rd at Danny Rays
34800
34800-
69600
12000
4.32
4.3 Acre field right side of Rd. at Danny Rays
25800
25800
51600
12000
4.32
Sub 19.3
Total 77.7 gallons 220200
33000 30000 45000
183600
261600
204600
35000
Total Applied 1013000 Gallons Applied
Average per Acre 13037 Gallons Applied 4.7 Units per acre
Analysis 01130 Nitrogen content is .36# per 1000 gallons applied

10/04/200D 12:36 919-715-604$ 0 LIWU NUN DISCHARGE SH NAut Di
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Fax
To: Calvin Pippin
4 w o
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Or
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URGE5
From: Sue Homewood
Fax: [phone] Pages: 3
Phone: pate: 1014100
Re: NRCS lagoon closure standards CC:
Lagoon Closure Report Form
© Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment © Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
Mr. Pippin,
If your facility is inactive, you are not required to be permitted. If you are in the process of closing the
lagoon you should follow the attached standards. The NRCS or Soil and Water Conservation county
office should be able to help you. Following these standards and completing the attached form is the
only way that the Division of Water Quality wrll recognize that a lagoon is closed permanently If you
need additional assistance please feel free to call or consult with your SWCD county office.
Nor -Discharge Permitting unit, 1617 Mail Service Cenler, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Telephone [phone]Oa3 W. 502. FAX [phone]. E-rnM: Sue .HoM9vVood(Nncmail net

DirtAori�'of Soil and V�'ater Conscrvacio}i -.Opd►•atiou Review '
© Division:of,Soil and Water Conseration - Compliance Inspection.
'0 Division of Water Quality - Coni'pliak6jnsj3eciiori
0 Other'AgEQ ; Operation Review
A Routine 0 Corn alaiut 0 Follow-up of DNVQ inspection Q Follow-u of DS%VC renew Q Other
! Fucilitr Numbct• ���---C� 1 1):rtc of [ns}►tctign
:.,...._...... ............._...... ,__..,__.._,...._... _ j I'imc of lnxpcclirus cf;j 2=1 hr. (hh:mtu)
❑ Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered ❑ Not Operational Date l..ast Operated: .... fp
Fa r n3 :\:I mc:.......WA..
Osvner Nome: .......... .4L!!/1!... AI:1.'}/1! ....... ......... Phone No:
. ............................................................... .......................................................................................
Facility Contnct: .... mE....... 5....................................'!'itic:..............,..........................................
.II ....... ............� i'V .11f....[.I..�!...........�t".L.`�./,7......
PhoneNo: ...................................................
Onsilc Representatkc:.... J.t4!?i.E:r...l .. r ?fir.......... ........... }ntugi'olor:....( ?.ev... 111 ki... '.444.v;1 n!l,''ati
Certified Operator: ......... SoQ:...... 45..... 7�td.VE.............................
1l..........—.......,....... Opel -:►tor Certili4ation Number:..........................
location of trarm: OpF gF AMAMz337 �!'IIPPld Qd1 141��1 �.l �Ylltty wt"ssr dl~ ASAST^...............
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................! A
....... .... ..................... ... .......... .. ..................
Latitude t ,L'I v.-I E707 Lon};itude ®° f$
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Fecderto Finish
pp
d
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to heeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultr•3' Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
E
Laycr ❑ Dairy —+ I
Non -layer ❑Non -Dairy II
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 0 ld Gu. +o7r
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface 1)1ains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Aron
11olding Ponds 1 Solid Traps J❑ NoLiquid Waste Management System
1)isch:rra us & Stt•c'ant Inrpal cts
L is any dicchargc observed from any }part of the operation?
Ui , h:tr�c on 'inaled at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
�. li'cIisrh::r«c is ot�tizr��ccl..�:r: thc� coni�'�'�rnoc null-.-In,::I_•;'
I�. II• rli;eltar� c is nh;rr�cc!. �lic! it rcu�h 1� ater l,l� the Sl:!�.:�'' i II'�e;, nulil��' U�1'(`))
c. IE dlSdwTe I; SnbannL ohm is We cohnnwd How In g'AhNn?
0. li?�tc> CjIti;:IIEIrL�s.' I-111?:I�� ;. I:i4_i!is[l �1'�ilrf7l? f,ll �'. lilti:lll 1_)A,Q)
Is there evidcnte of pall clisdvage &MI MY part of the oper:ttii?n? PRSV1h6Lq 12POVEd
i, "IN there my a d'•'el-se imparts or potential a0wrse impaas to do `eaters of We .1MU other An %n a dincktagc?
11:It.' ('r,llc�ticrn .\ "]re:atnrcnl
it. t 5cebu rd plus storm storage) less Kan adequate? LA Spills'• y
StrlF.'tL'i'i I Slru�iL,'l'C Strl!r: mi 3 StRwNw l
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ }'e: ❑ No
❑ As
❑ No
❑ )I;
❑ Apt
❑}Cs
9 L)
❑ }es
St,RI Uri n
]'rechoaril iin,hcst: ....�..b..LNG!+ 5... .lnr r...14..7`r 0'..,�'
I we there any' immediate threats to the inte«6W ofmq of the structures obser"d? jW act sere erosion, ❑ Yes 9 NO
seepage, etc.)
12369 Colrtititted on bark

IFaicility Number: Z — 7 I):Itt of lo.\pectio:r
0. Are OWN stale tunes 01)-silt which are not properly addIC'sSCd and/or nrlMlgCtl thruugh a waste manngcnlenl or
C10SUre plat/'?
❑ Yes Ej No
(If:1ny of questions 4-6 Was answered yes, and the situation poses an
r irllnlediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do anN• of the sU-uclures IlCed nrlill tcnancClin 111VIeslie nC?
S. Docs any part of the %\rite 111 maLc3ticlll systelll other thtlll "eaile StrllCturei require n111I1terlanlellln€�rU�'ClnOnl'�
9. DO all\' SltlClUVCS lack RdC(]1l',l1C. i-aUged rllarkCl•S With I'CC]LHICCI Il1nXIll1(Im and mimmunl liquid level
CiCI'afI()n marklnes?
Wn,,te Aimlication
❑ Yes Xj Nu
❑ Yes Ig No
❑ Y C.S 9 N.0
10.
Are there any buffers th:lt nee(i
❑ Yes
"No
11,
1s there cvldellct of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
No
12.
Crop type u A_I1�CAJrt� —
13.
Do the receivim, Crops dil'I'er with (110Se designmcd in the Ccrlifie(I Animal Waste Management flan (CAWNIP)?
❑ Yea
No
14.
n) Does the facility lack adQquatC acrt,t'C for lind application:'
❑ Yes
No
AN Does the facility need a %\citahle acre (determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
L c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre detetminmion?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving Crap need improvement?
❑ l'cs
4No
16.
is there a lack of adeCluate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
M No
Rccluirecl kect)rds d'' Doc'umenis
17.
Fall to have Certl I Kate of Covel.aILe &. Ciellcl':ll Permit reildll}' :4Vnda1)Il'?
❑ Yes
X No
H.
Does the facility fail 10 have al; coml:oncnts ol'the Certified Animal Waste Manmelllent Plan readily avlilable?
(ie/ WUP, checklist;, design, maps. etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ in"i ration, frticboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
CK No
20,
I: facility not in compliance with any applicable sctbac€< criteria in effect at the. time of design?
❑ Yes
15d No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a aC(iVCi)' M-tiked 0l3Cl'at0r In ChM-LIC?
❑ Yeti
NNO
22.
€'rill to notik, rcoional 1]WQ of ei m-,encly situations :1S I'quired by GenevId PCClllit?
(1c/ disCllal'ge, f rc6om-d problQ111s. OVor aPI7IICal Illll)
❑ Yes
No
i 23.
Did 12C\'Ic-1ver/lnspcctor fall to d1SCUS$ I"C\ lC\\'I111ipCCIlUII L\'lth i111 Sltt repiL'ienlallve?
t} l'i
❑ lU
24.
Does facilit\ reC]tlirc :t f'0ll0V,`-u]) Visit by Sallee aLCM:V?
❑ Yes
® No
25. WCI-C Illy 1111tional pr0111ems noted Wllic'h Cause rtonrorllpiiance ol- the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes X1 No
i.4.-1fi6dS of ddJCIOIC' its iccr � i1{►teal cliIHI'16 thi.s:� isit: l'oir Nvijl.febd-ke tio: fui-the* V ; +:�
C;on,ments (refer to question #): PAplain nay' YE-S -answers and/or arty- recommendations or any other continents,
List: dray+�in1 !s of facility it) better explain situations. (use additional pales as necessary):
/Ito Arai 04 AT T915 5 f rC S)Xg AT f iprr� 101% . 06 Mtf h%tIL 6 o,Y A C aSar 'c Puw Fed. 71l15
901;tt I&J.
1% '4 23 - Twin OWAS c j 00 u olt Wg 0,+ A jwligI -(,u ;w awTu t,c-/ 4' ruA rlmv e1: 7g1 sl ry verr.
Co4VW4''nsd5 61)5uEh 0A- t4or». p1" V05 $LiDt+,rd wd sm Of€b'66T. Ma Uview 44v
45 wsudC DLQ 14 gl,)yLokto
T
I:e�ic\+er/inspector Nance T&A Au 11
Ile"ie\\'er/lnspectol- Signature: Date: f�

Facili&y Number: 92- — 7 Date of Inspection � t
Odor Issues
*26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes.
0 No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shu(ters, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
El Yes
El No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pertnanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Additional omments andlor llrawmgs:
3/23/9

LAGOON CLOSURE CHECKLIST
LAND ..................................................... BEGIN TALKING TO LAND OWNERS ABOUT APPLYING YOUR
FERTILIZER TO THEIR LAND
WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(EXHIBIT B)....................................... NEEDED FOR PERMISSION TO APPLY FERTILIZER TO LAND
Cu THIRD PARTY AGREEMENT
(EXHIBIT C)...................................... NEEDED BETWEEN YOU AND PERSON APPLYING FERTILIZER
SOIL TEST ..................... .....................;... NEEDED ON EACH FIELD, PART OF WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
a LAGOON SAMPLE .................................. YOU SHOULD ALREADY BE TAKING THESE, BUT A CURRENT
SAMPLE IS NEEDED
3
SLUDGE SAMPLE* .................................. TAKE A 2"X90" PVC PIPE AND ON A BOAT GET 8 TO 10
SAMPLES. MIX IN BUCKET, FILL PLASTIC SODA BOTTLE'/'s
Co FULL
NEED 2 ESTIMATES ON CLOSURE........... IF APPLYING FOR COST SHARE, PART OF DOING BUSINESS
C WITH US. ( ESTABLISHED CONTRACTORS ON DISTRICT LIST)
aESTIMATES SHOULD INCLUDE INFORMATION REGARDING
R
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN .....................
CJ
O
Q
m
N
HOW WASTE IS TO BE REMOVED (DRAGLINE, AGITATE, AND
PUMP etc.)
DEVELOPED TO ENSURE FERTILIZER IS APPUEQ AT
AGRONOMIC RATES. (3 COPIES)
I COPY APPLICATOR
1 COPY YOUR RECORDS
1 COPY DISTRICT OFFICE
C
ro
* TAKE SAMPLES TO AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION OFFICE IN LOUISBURG

VIC
�p
_ ?'• �L l 'r �� * i' t; ��`�? �� } FF - i T 'T:.'.�'��°f' •s rY .e_ ��3' ��,�f�+� y -.d.t+ y Y1 , -�__
.f." f �i C k. 4} � 2�� r + � +� �Y• htr � .ii; �r � � �r �.ti'i t� � fi . .
����Y 'f+ . � ,� . ��•v: apt' a-i /Y �''f } �t , 4 •
-.'•#?�- �.5 ���;.� �tnk
�b/ti;y
Ail
41
;�++�r� .:, •lam, �z�i1 =sa�,ti�t3'� � ,�. •�
L y
l r'TN ti ._'�� 1 � �' � ; k t � '•fit'. a� � �Y 1`Ty!� :! �,x" � - � r.7 � � .
h? • tr ! Y, r� 4, .e .=•._ re YY \ r s
92-02-32 09 �J
Lagoon Closure
fl'

2
R s Rod Eley, or
Grade Planned Elev.
7- F.T.
;7
Tr
cm
7
xf
r
t
d -
—7

Stn- i B.S.
A-
Na
Gal vIh Pi���i
I. F.S.H. or Elev. or
Grade Rod Planned Elev,
l. , 4 ;
i
xL
114
,
Y
,
I � I

ti F.S. or -- Elev. or — ----- —r—� . I � S
Grade Rod Planned Elev.
f-
1(
i ' I
Ilf�
I t
v,
D; (- Key
�.
T gO
i
I !
LiI
i
10
JJ

Fr
F.S. or I Elev. or -..,,. •- r ; ;VOYI> �� Q11 f- -- - -i -- - G`i e, = r;,•t� �.
Sk, 6-S. H.I. i r
Grade Rod Planned Elev.-
-I-
IfE
I � I
t• N 1+
-T I i-
-7, 7 f.
r-
_ - - -- ----�--�-a-- � iF-I
�I--�--
' ,: � - - - -•---i -I- IE .i_.!.-T i- -�-�-- - f- - -..�-' - ��- i--1--1_..� _! � - I I I � I I � �3�T3'r-�
_ I {
;' ._. l.. I I ' i _� i I �_ } I __ __ �'-I I 6 E f � I I � I I f Y •3
f
•�Y-��``,J� I I ►� � I��� lip li i�i;(i�� .y����
�i-.t�.'Il.•� � yy A� Y-

OFFICE
LAGOON CLOSURE CHECKLIST
(North Carolina Agriculture Cost Share Program)
Contract # 92-02-32-09
ELGIBILITY:
• Did not receive cost share monies to install the lagoon.
• Creates or poses a potential water quality problem.
REQUIREMENTS:
Check boxes as completed.
ZLength of time lagoon has been abandoned. 6 years (Approx)
1Z Indication of status with Division of Water Quality (Notice of Violation). See DWQ letter
dated 5/17/00
ZName of watershed in which the lagoon is located. Moccasin Creek (G31
�✓ Name of receiving waters (stream or river). Unknown Trib_ptary of Moccasin Creek
Volume of lagoon based on length, width, slope and depth of liquid & sludge. 320,928 ft3
F1Surface acreage of lagoon. 1.6 Acres
Profile of the dam and how it is to be breached. (if applicable) ._ hL/A
Number of contractors (who can do the work) available to the District Five (5)
Signed NC-ACSP-IC form. See Attachment(CnMolpfpd)
Signed NC-ACSP-WMP form. Sep Attachment (Completed)
NOTES:
• Cost share is for the removal of waste only and stabilization of site (not for fill dirt).
• Breaching of dam is optional. All disturbed areas must be vegetated to permanent grass,
trees or wildlife plantings.
Closure is limited to 75% of actual cost not to exceed a set limit per applicant.
• Receipts and a copy of the waste analysis report must accompany Request for Payment.

NC DENR
DSWC
icant
.NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURE COST SHARE PROGRAM
APPLICATION FOR ASSISTANCE
_ Landowner
NAME: Calvin Pippin
BUSINESS:
ADDRESS: 9721 Pippin Rd
7ebulon, NC 27597-7876
DISTRICT SUPERVISOR? NO
i
SSN: 237-86-7466
FED ID;
YES
NAME:
BUSINESS:
ADDRESS:
NC-ACSP-1
(12/98)
• I i �s'VLr
YM!! .&'ryr+ TER ;`'
COUNTY:
APPLICATION NUMBER:
FACILITY NUMBER:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Wake
92-02-32-09
92-7
NCACSP
LATITUDE: 351 51 142
RECEIVING WATERS:
14 DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNIT #:
ASSOCIATED GOVT. PROGRAMS/PROJECT:
LONGITUDE: 78 118 135
Moccasin Creek (G3)
03020203010010
319 H PL 566 � I TVA I I CREP I I
II
'If applicant or landowner is part of a business, complete business information with SSN and Fed ld#. If applicant is not the landowner, complete
landowner information and have all parties sign all forms, or provide a copy of 10 year lease in lieu of landowner signatures.
1. Directions to site. Farm located at the intersection of Pippin Rd (SR 2337) & Shepard School (Old US 64 Hwy; SR 2406).
2. Type of agricultural operation. Abandon Hog Operation
3. Was this operation in existence prior to May, 1992? Yes _X_ No_ if no, provide a clear citation of law, regulation, standard, permit condition,
policy, or official guidance which caused the operation to now be out of conformity or out of compliance. (i.e., se ten• Neuse rvsw rules, sB 1217
Interagency Graup guidance).
4. Has this operation expanded since May, 1992? Yes_ No_X_ if yes, is the proposed treatment associated with this expansion? (Explain)
5. Describe problems and proposed treatment for which assistance is needed.
Needs assistance to close out lagoon to improve water quality.
I hereby apply for cost sharing assistance under the North Carolina Agriculture Cost Share Program. This application does not guarantee cost
share approval -or obligate the applicant to enter into a cost share agreement.
Applicant ? �'. [., t i .. > �Lr, 7 . Date

NC DENR
DSWC
NC-ACSP-2
(08/2001)
NORTH CAROLINA
AGRICULTURE COST SHARE PROGRAM
COST SHARE AGREEMENT
This agreement is entered into on this
and Water Conservation District and
Calvin Pippin
day of June_, _2002_, by and between the Wake Soil
(Applicant) of Zebulon,__N_C_T8( 3127}
(Applicant) of
(Landowner) of
(Landowner) of
hereinafter called "the cooperator(s)". This agreement for Contract No. 92-02-32-09— covers the
period of practice installation up to, but not beyond, the first Wednesday in June 2004, and includes all
items pursuant to 15A NCAC 6E .0102 (g).
THE COOPERATOR(S) AGREES TO:
(1) Except as provided in (1)(a) below, not begin installation until approval is given by the NC
Division of Soil and Water Conservation.
a. Provided conditions i-iv are met, the cooperator may choose to exercise the option of
proceeding with installation of best management pra.ctice(s) prior to receiving final
approval from the Division of Soil and Water Conservation.
i. The total amount of the contract does not exceed twenty-five hundred dollars
($2500); and
ii. The best management practices described in the CPO are solely vegetative in
nature; and
iii. The cooperator(s) is not a district supervisor; and
iv. The cooperator (s) has not used this exception prior to this instance during the
program year of the CPO.
Cooperators choosing to exercise this option must initial to acknowledge understanding
of each condition below.
I understand that this contract has not been approved by the Division of Soil
and Water Conservation and that I am proceeding with project installation at the
risk that the Division of Soil and Water Conservation may not approve thfs
contract.
I understand that I will not receive payment for installing practices under this
contract until the NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation has approved the
contract and the request for payment.
i understand that I may not hold the NC Division of Soii and Water. NC
Department of Environment and Naturai Resources, or the District liable for non -
reimbursement of the items below or for the improper installation of the BMP.
(2) Implement the best management practice(s) to the best of his/her ability in compliance with the
rules governing this cost share program and according to the attached Conservation Plan of
Operation (CPO).

(3) Complete 113 of the installation of the Best Management Practice(s) as described in the
attached CPO, as determined by the Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
within the first twelve (12) months following approval of the CPO by the NC Division of Soil and
Water Conservation. Failure to comply with this item will result in the immediate termination of
this Cost Share Contract. Cooperator(s) may request the _Wake_ Soil and Water
Conservation District for a six (6) month extension of this provision to avoid termination of
contract.
(4) Maintain and continue the cost shared best management practices on the attached CPO for the
minimum life set forth by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission, if the cooperator(s) fails
to properly maintain or continue the cost shared practices for their intended use for the life of the
practice, the cooperator(s) shall be required to repair or reimplement the practice within 30 days
(up to one calendar year for vegetative practices) or be required to repay the State of North
Carolina a pro -rated amount of the cost share payment as set forth in 15A NCAC 6E. If the
cooperator(s) abandons the current operation, converts the use of the cost shared practices or
fails to maintain the practices properly, the cooperator(s) will be required to repay to the State of
North Carolina a pro -rated amount of the cost share payment(s) as set forth in the rules
governing this program.
(5) Soil test at least every two years on benefited acres for the duration of the contract maintenance
period. Samples must be submitted to the NCDACS Agronomic Division (or other acceptable
testing facility) and the fertilizer application recommendations followed as closely as reasonably
and practically possible.
(6) As a condition for receiving cost share assistance for waste management systems, have the
waste material analyzed once every year to determine its nutrient content and if the waste is
land applied, to annually submit a soil test sample for analysis of the area of waste application, -
and to apply the waste as close as reasonably and practically possible to recommended fertilizer
rates. If the cooperator(s) fails to have waste and soil analyzed within a prescribed amount of
time as specified by the District, the cooperator(s) will be required to repay to the State of North
Carolina a pro -rated amount of the cost share payment(s) as set forth in the rules governing this
program.
(7) Permit access by Soil and Water Conservation District, Division and Commission
representatives at reasonable times to provide technical assistance and to inspect the practices
during and after implementation for proper installation, maintenance and continuation,
(8) Require any person(s) to whom the benefited acres are transferred by sale, lease or other
means to sign a statement to maintain and continue the cost shared BMPs for the remaining life
of the practice as a condition of the transfer of ownership or control. The cooperator shall give a
copy of the agreement to the District. Failure of the cooperator(s) to secure such an agreement
wili require the cooperator(s) to repay the State a pro -rated amount of the cost share payment(s)
as set forth in the rules governing this program.
(9) Repay the State a pro -rated amount of the cost shared portion of equipment purchased under
this agree lent that Is sold or leased within the maintenance period and further agrees not to
use cost shared equipment as collateral,
THE DISTRICT AGREES TO:
;1) Provide technical assistance for the planning. design. implementation. maintenance. and
certification for all best management practices (cost shared and non cost shared) contained in
the attached conservation plan of operation.

(2) Following District certification that best management practices were properly installed and
implemented, provide to the designated cooperators(s) through the North Carolina Division of
Soil and Water Conservation up to 75% of the average cost for each approved best
management practice contained in the attached CPO, 100% for practices receiving incentive
payments. Payments will be contingent on prior approval by the Division's NPS Section of the
CPO, any Revisions or Supplements, and Requests for Payment.
(Applicant) Date
(ignature)
(Applicant) Date
(Signature)
(Landowner) Date
(Signature)
(Landowner) Date
(Signature)
District Chair
- a
Date
(Signature)

NCDENR
DSWC
Waste Management Plan Statement
ADDENDUM TO NC-ACSP-2
NC-ACSP-WMP
A waste management plan for the operation which benefits by Agriculture Cost Share
Program CPO # 92-02-32-09 has been developed in accordance with N.C. NRCS
Technical Guide specifications. The waste management plan accounts for the
environmentally safe treatment, storage and application of all animal waste generated
by the operation.
2. The waste management plan includes maps and soil losses of the fields to which animal
waste is to be applied.
The Cooperator(s) have signed, agreed to the conditions of the waste management plan
and received a copy of the waste management plan.
4. A copy of the waste management plan with original signatures is a permanent part of
the District's cooperator file.
5. Any changes to the size or type of animal operation will require that the waste
management plan be revised and new signatures obtained.
Technical Representative
4)� L - -
Date

NC DENR NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURE COST SHARE PROGRAM
DSWC CONSERVATION PLAN OF OPERATION (CPO) SUMMARY
NC-ACSP-11A
(08/2001)
NAME: Calvin Pippin
AGREEMENT NUMBER
TOTAL ACRES
ANIMAL TYPE AND
ADDRESS: 0721 Pippin Rd
AFFECTED
NUMBER
7ebulon, NC 27597-7876
92-02-32-09
88.0
1040 (Feeder to Finish)
TOTAL COST
ANNUAL COST BY PROGRAM YEAR
TOTAL SOIL LOSS
TOTAL NUTRIENT
TOTAL WASTE
REDUCTION*
LOSS REDUCTION*
MANAGED
PY 2002 PY _ PY
TONS/YR
LBSIYR N LBSIYR P
LBS/YR N LBSIYR P
(P205)
$15,000
$15,000
NIA
2392
1352
2392
1352
Highest level of design approval FIELD OFFICE _X_ AREA OFFICE STATE OFFICE OTHER
The Cooperator(s) has reviewed the Cost Share Agreement and CPO and agrees to apply the planned treatment according to the
standards and specifications as approved by the Division of Soil and Water Conservation. Failure to carry out the un-numbered
contract items (UN) does not constitute non-compliance with the contract. The Cooperator(s) agrees to maintain the striperopping
system for 5 years, long term no -till for 5 years, nutrient management plan for 3 years, sod -based rotation for a minimum of 0
months in sod, and all other practices for 10 years, except conservation tillage, which is an annual practice. The Cooperator(s) also
agrees to fully implement the Waste Management Plan (WMP) that is part of the CPO. CPO and payment are contingent on
approval by NIPS Section, Division of Soil and Water Conservation, NC DENR. Funding for this CPO is contingent upon final
annual allocation of State funds to the District. Installation may not begin prior to receiving approval from the Division, with
the exception of vegetative -only CPOs not exceeding $2500, as provided by the NC-ACSP-2 contract form, if chosen by the
cooperator(s).
Applicant:
L
Landowner (if applicable):
Technical Representative:
Design Approval Authority: / ,
(Can be submitted separately from 11A)
District Chair.
Date: AC / G o—z_
Date. -
Date: dl o
Date: ( 0
Date:
'Or attach Resource liupact Summar j. {Hansard/Sugg worksheet cannot be substituted.]

NC DENR NORTH CAROLINA NC-ACSP-11
DSWC AGRICULTURE COST SHARE PROGRAM (12198)
CONSERVATION PLAN OF OPERATION (CPO)
NAME: Calvin Pippin
ADDRESS: 9721 Pippin Rd
7-ebolon, NC 27597-7376
AGREEMENT NUMBER
92-02-32-09
BMP
ITEM
NO.
TRACT/
FIELD
NO
PLANNED
TREATMENT
EST.
AMOUNTS
(UNITS)
AVERAGE
COST
$
COST
SHARE
%
ESTIMATED COST SHARE AND TIME
SCHEDULE BY PROGRAM YEAR (INCLUDE
OTHER COST SHARED FUNDING SOURCES)
PY 2002 PY PY
1
T63127
Lagoon Closure
(To Be Closed/ Abandon CAO)
1
$20,000
75%
$15,000
Technical Representative ,M Date iLylZ ^�

NCDENR NC-ACSP-1C
DSWC (7/2002)
ADDENDUM TO NC-ACSP-2 (CONTRACT AGREEMENT)
TO: DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
FROM:
SUBJECT: ABANDONED CONFINED ANIMAL OPERATION
1. No NCACSP financial assistance was received to install the animal waste system.
2. - The abandoned system has a potential for creating a water quality problem, if the dam is
breached and the effluent is allowed to discharge directly into a water course of the state.
The applicant has requested both technical and financial assistance from the District to
ensure water quality protection.
3. The effluent will be applied in an environmentally safe manner and a waste analysis will be
taken to determine the application rate. A waste management plan will be developed and
followed in accordance with NRCS specifications. Any areas disturbed by the removal of
effluent (liquid or sludge) will be seeded to permanent vegetation.
4. In signing this addendum, the applicant agrees that the lagoon/storage facility will never
again be used for stor' or treating animal waste.
r -
�'�-� DATE: 08 0 02
(Applicant Signature
DATE:_
(District Chair Signature) `%

Enviracon Inc.
P.O. Box 610
Tarboro, N.C. 27866
Subject: Lagoon Closure Estimate
Lagoon Size 1.4 acre 12' depth
Dear Mr. Pippin,
Please find below a cost estimate for #* closure of your 1.4 acne lagoon. Also not that this is a
estimate bases on the information that you have provided to us, li anything is found to be different
we hold the right to adjust the quote to reflect ails change.
Estimate of liquid to be spread 2,378,376 @ a cost of $.016 / gal. _ $35,675.64
This is based on being able to apply an the land within 1.6 miles)
Estimate to cover 1.4 acres at a depth of 6' 13,662 cu yds Q $2.501 cu yds. a $33,880.00
Create a meadow strip in the place of the lagoon. = 34,500.00
Final landscaping and grass sawing. $3,600.00
tabor required for loading and mist. _ $6,000.00
Total cost estimate. $83,555.64
For any addition information please fill free to contact us.
John Chapman Jr.
Vice-president
Enviracon inc.

M�:-GILL
1=lvvlaoNmENTAL S7S7EM5
aosrOFFLCE DOX et
FukARELL3, HCATH CARC)LINA 28444
P►t.sta53z-69 FAX9i0.512.25d2
vnrw. rncq���compo�t.c�m
Calms Pippin
'lip. - Farms
Nortia Carolina
Fax [phone]
Lagoon Closeout
May 1, 2003
PropoW for Msm m Ptut ong and Spreading:
Detail: Agitate, Pump and Slff a appsoxia a y 2,56A084 gallons of liquid swine
sludge mate= ftm farm lagom
Tbrue: it is esd rated to take 13 .full day to haul and spread 2,564,084 gallons,
at approximately 200,000 gallons per day, 10 hours per day.
Cost: Rate per 1000 gallons £of proposed job: $37.00
Additional 3 dollars, per mule per load over 2 miles.
Total estimated cosh including delivery and setup for proposed job: $ 82,050,00
Esti=ted cost includes all equipment necessary for mmotnn,g and Nxwdmg sludgt;.
(NOTES)
—.-Doe to the resbioud mobility ofuveke in advorse fight conditions, Mc& cannot be held habk for weather conditons that affect
the perIbooatsoe of our vehicles in off r and conditions, Therefore, arty mucturcd time schedWee ma only be eatEtaatod sad followed
ae closely an tithe and veratba RUvw.
—.—This ism* eetunaicd bid tar ttk AforeMetrtionad wodL Mcgtl arswnis reapona-bdrty for mdy agaiMeyd owned or leaced by
hlegi It fv o(M will operate borrowed cguipmcd undo We directioo of clivi wW asavmm Ao reoponsibilky fix rvpa." or
wairAmAncc umtmp prim Agraetbwat has bocce arranged or evidence ofnegliswca by MegW ynpra)reca Mq 01 maiM&ias fell workas
compensation >ttlaumnc% liability inmv=ce, and mft'itti6 ce. biegill abnmes mspo AbUity to Ballow NC MRCS guldlioes fir
ls.gom e10ae09tJ
BY: Z�r / ?
' - c-
1 / vanSchaick NC 91 n- -6
Twsi�d is effective ihrt?ugh Dec 31, 2c103

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 17, 2000
Calvin Pippin
9721 Pippin Rd
Zebulon NC 27597
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMI=NT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Calvin Pippin Farm
Facility Number 92-7
Wake County
Dear Calvin Pippin;
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources (DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Ranking
1 1.6 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collection and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session the General Assembly will consider
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] Fax (919) 57I-4718
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5490 recycled/14%a post-consurner paper

Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this Ietter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ken Schuster
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Wake County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

Lagoon Maintenance
The following is a list of firms that pump out lagoons. It is intended for information only.
It is not an endorsement for any particular contractor. When choosing a contractor,
check references and look at examples of the contractor's work. The firms are not listed
in any preference.
Bio-Nomics
516 Roundtree Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28217
800-782-6798
Contact: Peter Fleetwood
Joel Coert
Environmental Fertilization
Corporation of NC
197 Tally Ho Drive
Selma, NC 27576
919-965-6335
800-707-7448
Contact: Joe Vanschaick
Atlantic Coast Contracting, Inc
P.O. Box 1086
Dunn, NC 28335
910-892-3127
800-277-0528
Gilliam & Mason, Inc
P.O. Box 387
Harrellsville, NC 27942
252-356-2874
Contact: Billy Gilliam
Environmental Ag Services
P.O. Box 1156
1318 Lisbon Street
Clinton, NC 28328
910-592-5519
Contact: Don Matthis

umber
92 — 7 Lagoon Number 1,...,..,,,., Lagoon Identifier prim.dry............................................
Oa Inactive
.ste Last Added 1/..$........................................
,termined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres):
Embankment Height (feet):
Distance to Stream:
By measurement or Map?
Down gradient well within 250 feet?
Intervening Stream?
Distance to WS or HOW (miles):
Overtopping from Outside Waters?
Latitude 35 51 43 .
Longitude 78 i8 36
By GPS or Map? i- GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number:92a7.cor
�..: ............................
................................
0 <250 feet Q 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
® Field Measurement ❑ Map
0 Yes Q No
*Yes 0 No
0<5 05-10 0>10
O Yes Q No O Unknown
Spillway O Yes ®No Adequate Marker © Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): 20
inspection date 3/31 /2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
Q Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 20
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
Q No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
application equipment
and/or Sprayfield O Yes (@) No O Unknown
unavailable
comments
fail to make contact (9 Yes O No
with representative

e of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review @ Lagoon Evaluation
,:;eason for Visit @) Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other El Denied Access
Facility Number
M Permitted M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date of Visit
10 Not 0perational 0 Belo Nv Th reshold Date Last operated or Above Threshold: I.Q/I/`
.9.8 ..........
],'arm Name: .................................................................. ; ................. C o u n t y: �V . ................................... ............
Owner Name: C.,11yin Pippill .................. Phone No. 9
FacilityContact: ................................................................. .............. l'itle: ......................................... Phonc No: ......... ...... ...................
MailingAddress: 9.71I.PippinAd ....................................................... ............................. ZdLtl.Q.I)...N.0 ................ _ ... ....... _ .... ...................... 2759.7 ..............
Onsite Representative; ........ I ............................................................... ...................... . Integrator:....................................
Location of Farm:
.................
..................
CK Swine El Poultry Ej Cattle El Horse
Design Current
n,syme
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 1000 0
E] Farrow to Wean
[:] Farrow to Feeder
E] Farrow to Finish
in Gilts
JEI Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
ALayer I I JI I
I I Non -Dairy I E] Non -Layer I PDairy
C I
[] Other
Total Design Capacity 1,00=
Total SSLW 135,000 _ 1
Number of Lagoons 1 1 7:1 Molding Ponds / Solid Traps
Discllarkcs & Stream Impact~
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El YC s M N
F1Laketon ElSprayl7icid E]Other
Z1, 11' di"Chal-C Is oh"Crved. was the convcvance man -mode'? E] Yes CK No
b. 11' discllal.L�e is observed. did it lea�Il 11 area of, the Slate" (11' yes. 11olify M\,Q) 0files CK No
C. is ObSOWC(I. N� Imt is the C-slilliatcd I'low ill
2. Is (here evidence of past discharoc t . rolli ally part of the operation'? 0 Yes NO
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard phis storm storage) less than adequate'? El SPi1IWaV El Yes N'o
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/InspectorNatne Charles Alvarez
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
Agricultural Services Building
4001 Carya Drive, Suite D, Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
June 28, 2004
Joel Idol Jr.
NCACSP Environmental Technician
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
1614 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1614
Joel,
Enclosed are the following three Request For Payments.
Thanks.
Name
Contract# Practice
Amount
1)
Al Privette
92-99-03-09 Livestock Exclusion & Stream Crossing/Stock Trail
$ 5,017
2)
Calvin Pippin
92-02-32-09 Lagoon Closure
$ 15,000
3)
Alvin Carter
92-04-17-09 17 Month SBR _
$ 1,264
TOTAL $21,281
Robert Brown
Natural Resource Conservationist

NC DENR NOR I H CAROLINA AGRICULTL' 7. COST SHARE PROGRAM �'/« ' �� N('"
DSWC REQUEST FOh PAYMENT �10/03)
AGREEMENT NUMBER
y,2-6,�)-3.?-09
BMPs INSTALLED: AS PLANNED^ REVISED
This Request for Payment dated U for $ S DO v
completes the work to be done under this contract and the remaining
fund $ are to be returned to the District (current year
only) or the State Fund (check one).
(Attach revised Resource Impact Summary. Highlight revised impacts.)
BMP
ITEM
NO
FIELD
NO.
PRACTICE
PLANNING
& DESIGN
HOURS
INSTAL-
LATION
HOURS
UNITS
PLANNED
UNITS
COMPLETED
NCACSP
PAYMENT
�(20
OD
_
PLEASE USE YELLOW PAPER TOTAL

June 22, 2004
Calvin Pippin
2816 Stonewalk Ct.
Zebulon, NC 27597
Rob Brown
Wake Soil and Water Conservation District
4001-D Carya Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27610
Dear Rob,
Here is the information you requested. Hope this is what you need. If you have
any questions, call me, 919-632-5748.
You can be assured my expenses in closing this lagoon have far exceeded this
figure. If this was being closed based on todays cost sharing guidelines I would be
eligible for 75% of $49,008 which would be $36,756.
lThanlcs,l.
Calvin Pippin

Invoice
Date Invoice #
10/31/2003
Bill To
'2-77 S-9 i
P.O. No.
Terms
Project
Quantity
Description
Rate
Amount
7
j
Aga ,9�'�.�
J
/-S�
s0, r1G
Total ��z�

Pace Grading & Hauling
13290 Buffalo Rd.
Clayton, NC 27520
Bill To
Calvin Pippin Farms
9721 Pippin Rd.
Zebulm NC 27597
Invoice
Date
$/1 V2003
Description
Amount
Buldozer work around lagoon and track boe work
7,045.00
i
.i
i
Thank you for your business.
Total $7,045,00

Brock'
Equipment C6.
Invoice
FAO- Box '_100.1,.7.
NC_278��
DatQ -=­jnVoice.#
FF�V
MiRM
77
-7
911 ip;��
Zebulon; NC 2.7597
Terms
Ncl3p
Quantit
C6d
Description
Price Each..'
Amount
M
EquipffiRentalentRentalRental
of Hq*ec ManureSpreader150.00
A
A
you for your business.
Total
1,800.00

i
f i 3• '
!
I
Broci<, Equipment Co: Invoice'
SRO Box:.100 �,
--- = G {
_ -
;27$07 _ r , _.Date Invoice_#
- -
— - 3122n003
$IITo:�
Cal+ Pippin Farts
9721 (Pippin Rd: {{
Zebalon, NC 27597 # =1
J
t -
Terms Project
!
I
i
Quantity Item Code: Description i Price Each Amount
5 Equipment Rental Rental of Agitator i 150.00 6,750.00
i
1
A.
� I
ei
,ar►k you for your business.
Total
$6,750,00

3'
Brock Equipment Co: Invoice .
: PO Box.700
` Bailey, NC 27807.__-_ _ _ Date Invoice #
—� -. -
-252-235-4111 ': , — _ - - -=-2/10/2t103 12530
- -
II To - =A ... -
_ Pippin Farms - = -
Pip in Rd. --_
on, NC 27597
i
I '
Ter Project
Net 3¢
j
Quantity Item Code Description -Price Each Amount
I
7 Equipment Rental Rental of Huskee 3000 Gallon Manure Spreader 150.00 5,550.00
i
1
l
I ,
I
_.t
Total $5,550.00

Brock Equipment Co.
PO Box 100
Bailey, NC 27807
252-235-4111
Bill To
Calvin Pippin Farms
9721 Pippin Rd.
Zebulon, NC 27597
Invoice
Date Invoice #
9/6/2002 12430
Terms
Net 30
Quantity
Item Code
Description
Price Each
Amount
18
Equipment Rental
Rental of Huskee Spreader
150.00
2,700.00
16
Equipmvent Rental
Rental of Houle .Agitator
150.00
2,400.00
Thank you for your business.
Total s5,100.00

Invoice Number
Billing Date :
Payment Due Date
Pippin Enterprise
Hog Lagoon Hauling Project
1001-LA-PE
1 /15/2003
1/31/2003
Date
Description of Work
Total
Gallons.Applied
Cost 1
Gallon
Amount
Owed
1-11-03
Land Application Service
157.500.00
0.015
$2,362.50
1-11-03
Land Application Service
163,800.00
0.015
$2,457.00
0.00
0.000
$0.00
Mixer I Pumper & Tractor Discount
($300.00)
Total amount of invoice.
321,300.00
$4,519.50
Please Make Payments To:
Enviracon Inc.
P.O. Box 610
Tarboro, N.C. 27886
Fed, Tax ID Number 01-0554289
Balance Due: January 31, 2003
Payments riot received by January 31, 2002 is subject to a 10% late fee.
Thank you for your support.

Invoice Number
Billing Date :
Payment Due Date
Pippin Enterprise
Hog Lagoon Hauling Project
1000-LA-PE
12/2/2002
12/15/2002
Date
Dm2tion of Work
Total
Gallons Applied
Cost 1
Gallon
Amount
Owed
11-29-02
Land Application Service
$157,500.00
0.015
$2,362.50
11-3"2
Land Application Service
$157,500.00
0.015
$2,362.50
12-01-02
Land Application Service
$151,200.00
0.015
$2.268.00
Total amount of invoice.
$466,200.00
$6,993.00
Please Make Payments To:
Enviracon Inc.
P.O. Box 610
Tarboro, N.C. 27886
Fed. Tax ID Number 01-0554289
Balance Due: December 15, 2002
Payments not received by December 15, 2002 is subject to a 10% late fee.
Thank you for your support,

�qt• awe. + � ` � "�r'�.1 ''T�1
Jm
_ '''f-� •A Si q,�.���1, us' :`V�i a,G�'Li, r-�'a��'' �.r •
-�j; C:' M� �� �, . t r.,rL,�,� sue. �. _ ^•, '
`•�:Yj• . �r�� ; 's + �"-a " ' x�•; r r yi�,r�.Fw • �"�+ �# {� y � -. '��,r,,,:,',+;. s' T �.r� r '
Nit
44
�*'+ rfF1 �r••r � ,r '7�`/,SN�p h�s,tf*-.� -ice✓'. } �t�� t+" �'.s `^:r ��_ '£ _y n�5, ,. ���' ._iks-
.'r.r-r �.i t kY �S t'ry�r„yfir ?c •w G.x4�. '* 1d',�ri 79't•
� �w'* �'l4wr '•P - ._ K, � .¢ y '� �Stc �- r�. r � �"`jY'I' - - .- 4."tti a. ,�� }J i s �
Wir
00
h c
r ?' r '•t ors ,. �� {� --•yf ' ��`r. lyf
- •�,,,r4 _ e /. � �i ��� * r�, �;,,` �° �-t -i � r .3i- �r,�y . ., � k�''C�'�Y'�r' '-Owl:"� :-
+ d r :.' �. i � •M' r y,, r c, Y'r ' ��•'t"'R {. n', r+r ? cil '
.. ,� f t4 �+�ti 'C r > �, �' �,SFi ,,' � r •,ram y : y a �4�!-+ �7
¢VSS� N 1, k�RrtJrp`.
tj - - r • _ `i' • xr. Y
v 14T
n � ,{ir•as� St� +:. 6� v � rr'fi`? tt Y � � � *t,�, -
EI
N
}r
AT
Alli
� r �; h,jSy�fi. �. � e.�y�g>.r� X *��� 3 r• y"iv "'� {a,r L' � i fi.
.r Y
n �a
WIIL rr ..

NCD.A gonov-- Division 4300 Recdy Creek Road Raleigh, ANC 27607-6465 (91r '33-2655
Report No: '11 W
Grower: Pippin, Calvin
_
C'Olies '1'0: COL11114 EX1e11S1011 Director
9721 Pippin Rd.
liSDA-MRCS-Waice
Zebulon, NC 27597
WasteAnalys*isRioport
�'
M,
I'rrrltl:
8/28/97
Wake County
Sani le`Cnfo.
l.abar:itury Results (parts per million -unless otherwise notes(}; ..
kSantple M:
{ ,v
P K C7r r1f S
Fe . Afn 711
(:u
13,
AJo CY 6'
�SE_W.
Jnlr,! ;o-i ,1f
30; 487 111) 79.8 26.3
7.32 OAS 1.49
0.72
0.30
1:1' A
it .;If Al 11 ,1f
if Af Af
Al
:1!
Waste Code:
_A714
l,11.5
ar).3
I 1a A7 C.'d 11) _1!
Se Li 11
SS
(.`:1'
I1.11f+F CO..'% ALl:(h"'00
iDescri/Won:
OR -Al
121
7.62
swine Lgoon B .
urea
:11
1Rk6mn'icndations:::.-
:' : -Nutrients Available for First Cro ;y -rg_ ., _:. � .: �'z .:-16s/T000" allows-3 _
Other Elements
lbs/T0oO allows
11 �ldralron Afctl,vrl
IC..
N P 11; K?U . ' ca Afq 'S' . Fe Aln : Ln. Gir
B 16fo Ll
Na
!1 i
cd ` Pb Al . , Se Li,;",
1rCIg lllOII 3
.:1 9-. 1.4 3.y, _ 0 69 . , U 47 0.'15 0.0q 1. U Ul, �� �'
C ' > �' r
1.0
,
Sani
tAoratarv.Res ults aris' er rnillio'si mess otherwisc;ttritcd)k...Al v
Sample 1D:
A`
P K Ca Af
S' Fe
Mn Zu
Cu
11
MO (Y c
fi0'f °. =~L `
1b1rr1 i62 ,if
72.4 556 99.0 54.7
26.3 4.82
0.25 I.Uy
0.37
O.34
JN -N
of Al ,if 11
Al Af
At Af
if
If
Waste Code:
:1'IIi
1,11,5
1Yl.i
l,r A Gd 1'b
ell Se
LI DII
SS
L`A.,
D,11% CC9i % _11.I;*al)
OR -A'
135
7.46
�Descriplion:
1swilte La oolr l,ic .
1 rerr
1f
lteconidiendations::
'Nutrients Available'for. first Ceo .. ,
t , :. lbs%1D00, alloirs
Outer Elements
lbs/1O00 allons
111111iClrlioti"tfL'1J10d'.
N P l}5 K`4)
ca 1i1� `:S - IC "l1ftI:
"/,ld` GLL :".
`�_7ff(I a1
,A`a
!ti'r
Cd Ph' t11
Irrigation,...'
1.7 0.97' 4.i -0.58 :. _ 0 32 .'• 015 D.03 T. ''
001,` T"'" ,T=
].1

_NCI)kAgronot Division 4300-Reedy Creek R6id:,Raltigh;�NC-276Q7,.�6465,,,'(91! 33-2655"'i';
'Riiiobrt No WE
Grower- Pippin, Calvin
Copies To: County Extension Director
9721 Pippin Rd.
USDA-NRCS-Wake
Zebulon, NC 27597
Waste
Analy
sis Romrt Fann:
USDA-NRCS-W-ake
Agricultural Serv. Bldg., Suite D
4001 D Carya Dr.
I0/29/98
Wake County
Raleigli, NC 27610
Sample lnf6.
Laboratory Results milli 16's other*ise nbied)s.-
p per million`.unless
Sample ID:
N
P
K Ca MR S Fe Mn Zn
Cu
R MO C/ C
280 M
55.9
636 111 47.2 31.3 2.22 0,24 0,39
0,13
0.67
IN -N
M
M M H H M M M
I
M
Waste Code:
-N114
ALS
-NQ3
Na
Ni Cd Pb Al Se U pH
SS
ON DM% CCE% ALF(Kgao
167
7.84
Descriplion:
OR N
Swine Lagoon Lig.
Brea
M
Recommendations:
Available-forf
Nutrients &$11660'jillfohs'.
Other.flemints.. 1b
Appftcdtio?i Melbod-.
N -P205. X20
C,
Ca
g sn' 6
Na
V P& A g�
rrigation'_
1.2 0.75, 5.1
0.65-7
'54'
28 0W 18-"- T
-A'�'a"
"
V

'fit DA tki onoy Division....,.4300 Reedy Ci•eek Road Ralei NC"x27607,-6465F 91r W2265 ' � K x
i 5, e OWE
� .x, �
,Report`No.:nW{
Grower: Pippin, Calvin
Copies ro: County Extension Director
'-
9721 Pippin Rd.
USDA-NRCS-Wake
4
Zebulon, NC 27597
hill, Tom
zFa mWa
Tom
AQHill,
stt e nW pt s GhoI t Farm Pippin
C/0 USDA NRCS-Wake
✓✓✓ l
4001 D Carya Dr-
4/12/99
Wake County
Raleigh, NC 27610
Sam InkLaborato'
Results arts r million untess`othermse;noted
pie
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B HO Cl C
I,AGt)ON;� F
Total 348 M
56.6 603 115 46.6 31.8 3.47 0.39 0.60
0.28 0.62
1N -N
M M M M M M M M
M M
Waste Code:
-N114
AYS
-NO3
Na Ni Cd A Al Se Li PH
SS C.•N DM96 CC-N, ALL(K al)
Description:
OR-N
t69 7.75
Aerobic Liquid - Swine
Urea
M
ReconuaendaUons.
Nutrients A�ailablefor.FirSt Cro r z 160000 "allaris`y
Other,Ele'meutsr 'lbs/I000' yallortsm0'
::..
. r , .-` ,
p licutionhletGod>.`'
5 '' . M Z Cu B Mo Cl
•N P20 K20 Co,a - SoM 1e: n- r n: u - �..- . "`
$
y Na Ni Crl ' Pb Al Se y Li
Inn anon
i;
-�
1 -0 i n
5.-- 76 4 8 0 67 0 27 0 1 0.02 T T T, T.
9 ,-,
,u
F
1 M
n

NCDA Agror, is Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 c 733-2655 Report No: 1537 W
Grower: Ulansey, Ray Copies To: County Extension Director
1621 Honeysuckle Rd. USDA -MRCS -Wake
Raleigh, NC 27609
WasteAnalsis e ort Farm: CPIy� -
'18199.) Wake County
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results (Pa ts er million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID:
N
. P K Ca
M
S
Fe
Mn Zn
Cu
a
Mo CI C
�P1000
Waste Code:
ALS
Description:
Swine Lagoon Lig
Total 191 1.
IN -N
-NFI4
-NOS
OR N
Urea
67.6 651 105
M M M
62.9
M
27.2
M
3.40
M
0.41 0.63
M M
0.22
M
2.41
VN
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li N SS CA
DM% CCF% ALF K a!
173 1.19
M
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/1000 gallons
Other Elements
lbs/7000 allons
4pplication Method
Irrigation
N P205 . K20
0.80 0.90 5.3
Ca Mg S Fe
0.61 0.37 0.16 0.02
Mn
T
Zn
T
Cu 8
T 0.01
Mo CI
Na
1.4
Ni Cd
Pb Al Se Li

i:CDA Agronom
iiyision 4300 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 (919) }-2655
eport No: WO,.
i W
Grower: Pippin, Calvin
Copies M: County Extension Director
'
9721 Pippin Rd.
USDA -MRCS -Wake
JK,.....,
-
caste
A
nalyszs e ort
Zebtilon, NC 27597
lr+l
rrrrin:
n [
: 7
�
USDA_NRCS-Wake
kgricultural Serv. Bldg., Suite
4001 1) Carva Dr.
D
1/19/00
Wake County
Raleigh, NC 27610
Sam le Info.
Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample 11):
A'
P
K Ca A19 S
Fe Mn 7n
C11
B Afo (!
C
LAG 1)1
lolal 114 L
2.83
141 87.2 28.9 12.5
1.18 1.55 0.33
0.01
0.69
IN -N
VI,
L M M L
L H M
11
AI
Waste Code:
-A714
ALS
-AYl3
Ala
A`i Cd PG AI
Se Li All
SS
C:N DAM CCEN
ALE(K al)
Description:
Ole -A'
53.6
7.05
Swim Lagoon Liy.
tired
L
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/1000 gallons
Other Elements lbs/1000
allons
Application Afelbod
N P20i K,-)O
Crr
Mg S Fe Mn Z?r C11
B Mo CI
Na
Ni Cd Pb A/
Se Li
Irrigation
0.48 0.04 1.1
0.51
0.17 0.07 0.01 0.01 T T
T
0.45
Sam Ic Info.
Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample 1D.
N
P
K Ca M9 S
Fe Mn Zn
CU
13 Afo (J
C
LAGM
TONI 54.6 vi.
43.5
373 105 50.9 22.7
1.30 0.27 0.33
0.02
1.10
IN -N
211
Al Al H M
L M At
V1
11
Wasle Code:
-A71a
Ala
Ni Cr1 Pb Al
Se Li P11
SS
C'N DAM C' IM
ALEK (d
ALS
40,3
107
7.46
Description:
OR -A,-
Swine Lagoon
lirrrl
Al
Recommendations:
Nutrients
Available for First Crop
Ibs/1000 allons
Other Elements lbs/1000
gallons
Application Afetbod
N P_�5 X,20
Crr
Afq S Fe Mn 7.n Cu
B Afo CI
Na
Ni Cd 111) al
Se M
Irrigation
023 0.58 30
0 61
0.30 0.13 0.01 T T T
0.01
0.89

thAAC h h rlr u l
ivCDA A ronom
Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 919 5-2655
1LN1XjV Report No: WO- 3 W
- Grower:
Pippin, Calvin
COIJ1eS To: Counly Extension Director
'
9721 Pippin Rd.
USDA-NRCS-Wake
P
Waste
A R
Zebulon, NC 27597
U ti1),1MCS-Wake
nalyszs ehort
,,nn:
Agricuhur.d Sm. Bldg., Suite I)
4001 1) Cary a Dr.
8/30/00
Wake County
Raicigh, .NC 27610
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca M S
Be Art 711
("11
B :1Ia (,7 C
1
'1'utrrl 23.8
23.1 366 61.0 35.6 13.6 0.92 O.I6 1.02
0.08
0.53.
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NII4
Nrr Al cd Pb Al
Se Li /
S5
C.-A, Ih11%
AIS
-NO3
99.9
6.80
Description:
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Liq.
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
Ibs11OOO Vilons
Other Elements lbs/1OOO gallons
Application Melbod
N P2O5 K20
Ca ,big S Fe M11 Z,1 Crr
B Mo C1
Na
Ni Cd Pb Al be Li
Irrigation
t1.10 0.31 2.9
0.36 0.21 0.08 0.01 T O.01 T
T
0.83
[lie pti of the lagoon liquid is below the ideal range for bacterial action and waste treatment. Gradually adjust pil by adding
1 lb. of agricultural lime per 1000 cu. ft. of liquid remaining in the lagoon. Sample the Lagoon
nonthly and continue to adjust pit until it is within the desired range of7.0-8.0.

NCDA A ronon
Jtvision 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 919 3-2655
Report No: WO ,7 W
Grower: Pippin, Calvin
Copies To: County Extension Director
'
9721 Pippin Rd.
USDA-NRCS-Wake
7cbt lon, NC 27597
F�.,,...,.E.
aste nal szs e ort !(rrsn:
USDA-NRCS-Wake
agricultural Sen. Bldg., Suite D
'
111
4001 D Carya Dr.
9/18/00
Wake County
Raleigh, NC 27610
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample 1D.-
N
P 1[ Ca Mf S Fe AM 711
Cu B A10 CI C
1A
Tolul 59.8
31.8 307 86.0 39.8 14.5 1.19 U2 1.16
0.15 0.84
1N -N
Wasle Code:
AL1
-N114
-N)3
Net Ali (;d Pb :11 Se 1.i P11
SS L:N D.1111%,
85.4 6.29
Description:
OR-N
tits-ine Lagoon Liq.
Urelr
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop lbs/1000 allons
Other Elements lbs/1000 gallons
Ajiplication Mellor!
r1' P20> ti (.'cr ,bag S Fe Mn Zra G'tc B Mo C/
Na Ni Crl Pb :11 Se !.i
Irrigation
0.25 0.43 2.5 0.50 0.23 0.08 0.01 . T 0.01 T T
0,71
he pat of 1he lagoon liquid is below the ideal range for bacteria] action and waste treatment. Gradually adjust p1t by adding I Ib. of agricultural lime per 1000 cu. ft. of liquid remaining in the lagoon. Sample the lagoon
nonthly and continue to adjust }I until it is within the desired range of 7.0-8.0.

NCDA Agronom
Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 919 j-2655
Report No: W0: I W
Grower:
Pippin, Calvin
Copies To: County Extension Director
9721 Pippin Rd.
USIM-NRCS-Wake
Waste Analysis effort
7ebulan, NC 27797 �' '
nn ,-, r.� L
�C� ��Uu ]1SD1 NKt;S-Wake
Farm: �lgricullural Serv. Bldg., Suite D
4001 ]) Caiwa l)n
9/29/00
Wake County
Raleigh, ,NC 27610
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
.Sample ID.
N
P A Cu Mg S
III" rilu 711
Crr B No L'1 C
SLR
Tulrrl 1319
1361 428 1853 664 303
387 17.6 54.4
32.7 0.00
IN -N
Wasle Code:
-N114
ASW
-NO3
I4'rl Ni Cd Pb _11
.Se Li PH
SS (.:N DAM GY.7:`% alli(A Irrl)
115
7.16
DescHplion:
OR-N
Aerobic Sludge - Stivinc
direct
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
1bs/1000 gallons
Other Elements lbs/1000 allons
Applicalion Melhod
N P-X)5 h A) Ca A1g S Fe Mn Z11 Cu
B Ma CI
Nrr Ni Gil Pb A/ Se 1.i
Irrigation
5.5 18.2 3A 10.8 3.9 1.8 2.3 0.10 0.32 0.19
0.00
0.96
the waste product contains large amounts of phosphorus, zinc, and copper. The waste should he applied at rates needed to meet crop nitrogen requirement unless one of the other elements are more restrictive. When
oil test P is very high and
the rile is vulnerable to phosphorus movement to nearby surface water, limit application of P to estimated crop removal of this element. Limit zinc and copper application as necessary to
void excess accumulation of these elements in the soil.

NCDA Agroi .ic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 (f
3/23/01
733-2655 _ Report No: - . 7190 W
Grower., Pippin, Calvin Copies To: County Extension Director
9721 Pippin Rd. USDA -MRCS -Wake
7_ebulon. NC 27597
Waste Anal sisReporty
Farm:
Wake County
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample 10:
N
P K Ca M
S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B
MO CI C
LAG
Waste Code:
AES
Description:
Aerobic Liquid - Swine
Total 45.8
IN -N
-Nf l4
-NO3
OR-N
Urea
392 327 10.3 43.4
19.9 2.15 0.14 0.31
0.21 0.63
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pH SS C.,N
DM% CCF% ALF K al
87.4 7A2
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
Ibs11000 gallons
Other Elements
lbs/1000 allons
4pplication Method
Irrigation
N P20s K20
0.19 0.52 2.6
Ca Mg S Fe Mn
0.41 0.25 0.12 0.01 T
Zn co B Mo CI
T T T
Na Ni Cd
0.73
Pb . Al Se Li

ADA A ronon
Avision 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 919 3-2655
Report No: W4 -2 W
Grower: Pippin, Calvin
copies 70:
9721 Pippin Rd.
C'G �,G 1., it
Zebulon, NC 27597
�1
Re4iort
R.............Waste
na yszs
Fann:
2/21/02
Wake County
Sample Info.
Laboratoa Results (Pa ts er million unless otherwise noted
Srunple ID:
N
P K Ca Mg S
Fe Mn� /,n
L'u B A10 CI C
1
Twul 56.2
40.1 105 92.3 48.1 25.6
_
2.54 0.23 1.36
0.20 0.36
!A' -N
Wtiste Code:
-NI14
Na Ni cd PG A!
Se Li )H
SS C-N Ihif3V0 C(:'I"% ;llli6Kg(d)
ALS
-Nr13
35.1
6.76
Description:
OR -A'
Swine Lagoon Liq.
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/1000gallo:ys
Other Elements 1bs/1000 allons
:lp)licrrlion Metbod
N P?05 Ks0 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Crr
B Mo CI
Na Ni G'd Pb Al Se Li
Broadcast
0.23 0.54 0.84 0.54 0.28 0.15 0.01 T 0.01 T
T
0.29
I'he pi I of the lagoon liquid
is below the ideal range for bacterial action and waste treatment. Gradually adjust pH by adding 1 lb. of agricultural time per 1000 cu. ft. of liquid remaining in the lagoon. Sample the lagoon
nonthly and continue to
adjust pl I until it is within the desired range of 7.0-8.0.
Sample Info.
LahoraLog
Results (pa is per million unless otherwise noted)
,S'runpl a ID.
N
P K Gil Mk
S Fe Mn Zrt
Cu B
Mo [,'I C
2
Toler!
461
T
431 150 528 248
102 96.2 7.41 21.4
14.4 0.60
IN -N
Waste Code:
-A'114
Nrr Ni C(! A
At Se Li )H
5S C:N
DAM CCL•11E a1,E(Krrl)
ALS
A'O3
41.7
7.04
Description:
UI!-AV
Swine Lagoon Li( .
0-eu
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbM/1000gallous
Otber Elements
lbs/1000 gaUons
ApplicaliohMelbod
N P205 K-M Ca Mg S Fe Mn
Zn Cu B Mo CI
Na Ni Cd
P6 AI Se Li
Broadcast
1.9
5.8 1.2 3.1 1.5 0.59 0.56 0.04
0.14 0.10 T
0.35

NCDA A ronon Avision 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 M 3-2655
Report
No: VIG A W
Grower: Pippin, Calvin
Copim To:
9721 Pippin Rd.
7ebulon, NC 27597
L" o_j
E)W
r+RephY0/ t Twnn:
iteAnalysis
4/18/02
Wake County
Sample Info-
Laboratory Results (pa ts er million unless otherwise noted
S'anrlile ID:
N
P K Of Mf S Fe Mrt Zrt
Cx B
AN CY c
01
Total 39.9
56.0 118 103 43.1 22.5 2.28 0.29 0.81
0.13 0.44
Il�r -fir
Waste Code:
-A'11I
Nu Ni cd Pb At .tie Li JI
SS C:N
A11% cc/'`; al,li(K�il)
AI.S
_N0.3
45.7 0.75
Description:
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Liq.
Urea
Rcconnuendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop lbs/1o0O allons
Other Elements
1bs/I000 allows
application Afelborl
N P205 K1-0 cli Mg S Fe Mn Z11 clr B Iwo C'
Nu Ni Of
A :11 Se Li
Irrigation
0.17 0.75 0.95 0.6o 6.25 0.13 .0.01 T .0.01 T T
0.38
I'he ptl of the lagoon liquid is higher than normally found in treatment lagoons. Take follow-up samples to determine if pli remains high over time. Contact a Technical Specialist to be sure that the waste treatment
;vstein is working properly.

a
NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Report No: W05327 W m
Grotrrer: Pippin, Calvin Copies To: LLJ
9721 Pippin Rd.
Zebulon, NC 27597
WasteAnalysisRl>hOrt Farm.
E)
1/20/03 Wake County
Sample Info. Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted) c
c
Sample 1D: N P K Ca 47 S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Ct C L
"S SWI Total 40.5 _ 288 56.7 93.4 27.9 0 5 1.93 0.31 0.39 0.12 0.37 1
IN -N
Waste Corte: -N114 _
ALS -NO3 M? Ni Cd _ Pb Al Se Li N SS C:N VM% CCE% ALC(K m
Description: Ode-N 26.ft 6.97
Swine I agoor Lir.. Urea
Recommendations.____ __Nutrients Available for First Crop lbs/1000 allons Other Elements 1bs/10009a11ons
Application Method N PM5 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mr Zn Cu 6 Mo Cl Na Ni Cd Pb Ai Se Li
Soillncorp 026 0.44 0.5- 0.62 0.'.9 0.07 00` T f T T 0.22
Ilse pk of the lagoon licuid is below the iceat urge for bacterial actior. arc waste treatment. Gradually adjust ply by aer_:irg ` lb. of agricultural lime per ,000 cu. ft. of IiGuic remainirg it the lagoor. Sarnple ti-e lagonr
morll:ly arc, corlinue to adjust pH ur.W it is witlAr. We resired rarge of 7 0.8.0,
Sample Info. Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID: N P K Ca M S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Cl C
2 Total 43.8 1 4-.3 54.4 123 32.8 17.7 i".3 0-79 1..8 1.10 0.42
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4.
ALS
-NO3
Description:
OR -IN
Svire 1. gdor l iq.
Urpa
Recommendations:
r
26.3
Nutrients Available for First C
6.49
lbs/1000 allons
Elements
lbs/1000 gallons
Application Method N ? P?05 KAJ Ca Mg S !e Mn Zr) Cu B Mo Cl I Na Nt Cd Pb At Se Li
Soillrcorp 0.2b- 0.63 0.49 0.82 0.22 0."2 0.08 0.0" 0.01 0.0 i 0.22
the lAl of the lagoon liquic is below the iceal rarge for bacterial action arc waste treatmert. Gradually aojust pH by adding ` lb. of agricultural lime per 1000 cu. ft. of tiouid remaining ir, the lagoon Sampfe tl-e tagoor
monthly arc cortini ie M acjust pl i until it is :,vitl sir. the desired rarge of 7 MD.

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Grower:
Pippin, Calvin
Report No: W05327 Pg 2
Sample Info.
Latmratnry RE•sults (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID:
i4 _._
p — K Ca S
Ie _ Mn
Cn Crf B
Mo !1 C
_Mq
70.%34373 238
_�53 ".00
3.06 E}.a8
Waste, Code.:
Al ;
Nrt:
N; NI Crr ID A)
- - .._... -------- — --
SO I.i
Ir ss C:N
�- S C:N
A
IIMn c'rr 4, etc Ic (r
{ ��
Description.
Otl '4
-- --- - -
4. i
-----
___:
6.88
— - _ _- -- -
S*ir;: I ;.;I rr I is
! f!fa.,!
i
Recornrnendations:
_ _ Nutrients Available for First Crop
Ibs/7000 gaIIons
Other Elements
lbs1700Ogallons
Apphr,-woii Mc-07, r7
_ _ _
N 1 0;; K:.0 i"H Me, S IP Mn Ln Cu
13 Mo
C1
Nrt Ni
Ld Ib ,i To Li
Soil irr.ori)
11-'.i, (} ,;Id 0 "I f 02;i 0." 6 0 -.0 0.0-' 0.02 001
r
0'20
I hc:liPl r,f Il a I,:yr,;
;-r,r Naaste trt�ztr3tert -
nee(000 C.U. (i. of 111-.01c rerrI�:frfr'g
it li'r I'r-;IrXrr. S mplr: II'e 9,.grxrr
nwnll-Iy prr: rorl p •ise
in r.r:�� iSl I:I I � u,i �! it r; vril E-n� Il�r r:c��i cr: range. of 7.0.3.Q
1

ACDA A ►ronoi
Division 4300 Reedy eek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 (919 3-2655
Report
,No: W( !0
W
C]mroer:
_
Pippin, Calvin
copies Iv:
9721 1'i1}pin Rd.
1
E)wste
nc� yszs effortFaFarm::
2/19/03
Wake County
Sample Info.
Laboratory Results (pa ts per million unless otherwise noted)
Smufile ID:
A'
P A Cef jl1q S
Fe ,1111 711
Crr 1,
:110 r,Y
r;
IIN'I
Total IO.g
3.71 53.9 63.2 12A 6.18 3.09
(.12 0.19
oA 0.65
IN -A'
Waste Code:
-A717
A'a Ni Cd A al
Se - I,i 11I
.SS C.-N
D.1111: 1,'t,I ".'b
.l HY ,a1)
AFS
Descri fit iou:
-A713
Illy -:1'
31.6
5.79
:1erA* I.i(uid - SWine
1:i-ea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
Ibs/1000 gallons
Other Clements
Ibs/1000 gallons
AppliralimAletbod
AT P_ )5 K20 Of mg S Fe AM Z11 C11
B Mo CI
Na Ali Cd
Pb al
.ail Li
Irrigation
0.05 0.05 0.43 0.37 0,07 0A4 0.62 T T T
T
U6

NCDA lgrono Division
4300 Reedy Creek Road Ralei , NC
27607-6465
?) 733-2655
Report No: C '16
Grower.,
Pippin, Calvin
Copies to:
'
9721 Pippin Rd.
Zehu1011, IBC 27597
Soil.
-�
�est e art
rrrrrn:
�[
9/20/O0 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS
Wake County•
Agronomist Comments:
A -- 3, 12
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No, Ias1 Crap
Ato
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
R05 &0
Mg Cat
Zu
B
Mn
See Note.
13311I 'Tobacco FC
1st Crop: SmAl Grains
Tr
80-100
0 40-60
O {)
O
f)
3
2nd (xo): Fes/OC/fini,Ei
(1
50-70
0 0-20
O (}
0
11
12
Pest Results
Sod Class IIM% [f/lV CF,C
BS°/
Ac p11 P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NCk-N r1'IL-N Na
MIN 0.6 1.47
5.0
84.0
0.8 5.8 165 46
56.0 24.0
123
76 83 153
153
72
123
0.0
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Samjile Ao. Last Crop
Alo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P_05 Kt0
Mg Cn
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
li.iB2 Tofmcco FC.
1st Crop: Small Grains
Sr
80 100
0 4[) 60
0 {)
O
0
3
and Crop: fcs/0G/rim j"
0
50-70
f} 0-20
0 I}
(}
(}
12
'Pest Results
Soil Class 11M% [V/1'' CF,C
1tS-'6
Ac pl1 P-1 K-1
Ca Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-AID,
Cn-1
S-1
SS-1
A1Q-N NIL-N Na
MIN o.46 1.52
4.3
s6.o
o.6 6.2 ISO 45
52.0 28.0
21
57 64 143
143
76
73
(M)
Field Information
Lime
Recommendations
-Applied
Sample A'o. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P-O5 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
rlln
See Note
fi3A1 Soyfleans
Isl Crop: Small Grains
.3T
80-100
0 60-80
(1 f}
{)
{)
3
2nd (zo p: Fcs/0G/rim,E
U
50-70
0 20-40
0 (1
p
()
12
Test Results
Soil Class HAI% IV/1' CEC
Ma
Ac pll P-1 K1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cm -I
S-1
SS-1
NQ-N NIL'-N Ala
MIN o.46 1.49
3.7
84.1)
0.6 6.4 97 33
52.0 29.0
82
56 63 75
75
56
23
0.0
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
.Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
R05 ko
Mg Crt
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
H3A2 Soyhe:uis
Ist Crop: Tobacco K
.3T
50-80
60-80 150-170
0 0
[I
(}
1
211d Cmp> Small Grains
{)
80-100
30-50 9{}-1 10
(} 0
{)
0
3
'Pest Results
Soil Class 11,41% W/1' CE,C
11SY0
Ac Jill P-1 K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mu -AI (1)Mn-M (2) Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1
Nih-N AlIli-Al Na
MIN o.56 1.34
2.8
75.0
0.7 5.6 40 21
54.0 19.0,
81
59 59 65
65
34
22
0.0

.iAAgrone-�-ic,Uivision . 4300 Reedy Creek Ra td 'Raleigh; NC_2760.7„V6,465.y-` ',119�.7:33-2G55 s:
Report'No: "SSG
..rower: Pippin, Calvin
Copies to: County Extens.,.., Director
9721 Pippin Rd.
7.ebulon, NC 27597
Soil
Test Report
Pann:
9/ 8/97 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS
Waite County
Agronomist Continents:
A -- 1, 3,1;, 11
FieldInformatlon a
lied;timeRecommeiidations
kx - -'�c�' '�`' 3s` `4•, k-. y5:. .tea � -,. .„. R
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr 1'/A
Crop or Year
Lime N k05 hi0
Mg Cu
Zn B
Mn See Note
JAA Soybeans
Ist Crop: Tobacco,FC
.3T 50-80 0 160-180
$ 0
0
0 1-
2nd Crop-. Small Grains
0 80-100 0 90-110
$ 0
0
0 3
'Pest Results
Soil Class LW% W/V CE,C
BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I
Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1 S-1
SS-1 NO3-N NIh-N Na
MIN 0.41 1.70 2.2
64.0 0.8 5.6 128 19
50.0 11.0 89 63 63 88
88
39 26
0.0
Fie yin ormatian
ie time
1Recommen rions
k
4.
Sample No. Last Crop
Ho
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime N P05 KO
Mg Cu
Zn B
Mn See Note
1BB Soybeans
1st Crop: Tobacco,FC
.3T 50-80 0 130-150
0 0
' 0
0 1
2nd Crop-. Small Grains
0 80-I00 0 70-90
0 0
0
0 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
BS% Ac pH P-I ICI
Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1 S-1-
SS -I NQp-N N1h-N Na
MIN 0.76 1.61 3.6
69.0 1.1 5.8 275 30
54.0 11.0 191 125 I25 128
128
58 32
0.0
FicId l'Ifarmation "
`I�ed"tune
Recommendations a E R 4 �,
. ..'
Sample No. Last Crop
Ho
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime N JW 5 hz0
Mg Cu
Zn B
Mn See Note
IBA Soybeans
1st Crop: Tobacco,FC
AT 50-80 0 150-170
$ 0
0
0 1
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0 80-100 0 80-100
$ 0
0
0 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
BS% Ac pH P-1 K 1
Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-A1(1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1 S-1
SS-1 NQl-N NI&N Na
MIN 0.32 1.68 1.7
53.0 0.8 5.5 156 23
41.0 8.0 53 42 42 87
87
44 22
0.0
FeeldInfotmatton
liedtiirie
Re`commenclallonsxof
.��.v�.,..•.>
�. �.
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime N M5 hr0
Mg Cu
Zu B
Mn See Note
IBB Soybeans
1st Crop: Tobacco,FC
0 50-80 0 140-160
$ 0
0
0 I
2nd Crop: Small Grains
0 80-100 0 80-100
$ 0
0
0 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
BS1% Ac p11 P-I K I
Ca% Mg% Mu-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-I S-I
SS-1 NO3-N NZ&N Na
MIN 0.36 1.64 2.1
62.0 0.8 5.8 174 24
45.0 10.0 79 60 60 120
120
61 24
0.1

-.A.Ag.-ou, u. Divisiou -43 W. Ree dv,Creek, Road, k lta!ei h, M^
27607.,-,6465Ec,
'19),73317, 655,, Growcr: Tiepin,
,Calviii
Report No: 5 5 6 Pa 2
tp
:fiOW I
tions...'.... uv-
AJJ�HM.Ufk 'M ' ' , . 't,
Sample No. Last Crop
to
Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N 1105 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
bin
See Note
2A Tobacco,FC
1st Crop: Small Grains
AT
80-100 0 40-60
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Cro : Soybeans
0
0 0 40-60
0 0
0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1) Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N NU-N Na
MIN 0.56 1.55
4.5
76-o
1.1 5.6 no 45
55.0 14.0
111 77 77 114
114
73
41
0.0
4,2' pi
l i ed Lime
S:� 4?
ke �c- o' h i ffi e' i i dA t 1'0 fii-1A
Sample No. Last Crop
Ho
Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 ko
Mg Cu
Zn
B.
Mn
See Note
2B Tobacco,FC
I sl Crop: Small Grains
AT
80-100 0 100-120
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop: Soybeans
0
0 0 100-120
0 0
0
0
3
1 Test Results
Soil Class IIM% W/V CEC
BS%
Ac p1l P-1 K-1
Ca% XgOA
Mn - I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn - I
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1
NO3-N AH-N Na..
MIN o.46 1.63
2,8
61.o
1.1 5.6. 216 17
45.0 13.0
107 74 74 100
100
66
33
0.0
A nie
Reti6ns,,5;,,, �,Li K-Z"'A",
comnien da Lep", Vn
Sample No. 'Last Crop
Mo
Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N M5 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
3A Tobacco,FC
1st Crop: Small Grains
0.
80-100 0 90-110
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:Soybeans
0
0 0 90-110
0 0
0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class A41% W/V CEC
BS%
Ac P11 P-1 K-1
Ca% M9%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
S-1
SS-1
Aa-N NXN Na
MIN 0.58 1.62
3.4
76.0
0.8 6.0 221 22
57.0 15.0
117 80 80 136
136
-99
31
0.0
F i e I d,,Iii 156 f: mi'A t i o
-time
Recommendations,'
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N P2O5 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
3B Tobacco,FC
Ist Crop: Small Grains
qT
80-100 0 40-60
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop;So beans
0
0 0 40-60
0 0
0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-I K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1Mn-AI (1)Mn-A1(2) Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NO3-NNm-N Na
MIN 0.6 1.57
4.0
60.0
1.6 5.2 306 47
42-0 13.0
85 61 61 137
137
52
39
0.0
Fidd-Iffif6eMAtid J�
A
i d. i
Aecommen §iEWNN�
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N M5 K-0
Mg, Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
HA Pine,M
1st Crop: Pine,M
-5T
100-150 30-50 20-40
0 $
0
11
2fi(l Crop:
Test Results
Soil class HM% W/V CEC
BS%
Ac PH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-IMn-AI (1)Mn-A1(2) Zu-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1jVc8-NvJh-N
Na
MIN 0.36 1.36
3,2
41.0
1.9 5.1 16 25
26.0 12.0
184 57
57
22
35
0.0

,-CPA-52 Nov. 2001 (p.1)
INVENTORY OF RESOURCE CONCERNS TO BE ADDRESSED IN PLAN
Page 1 01'
,-epared for: Farm/Tract:
,epared by: c--e "n/_114
- L rl. . .1. -, %1.;6-
-'�;-�J�,ONCEF M V-'
44!
1 . .­z - . .. ., . ­ .? Ix--
LDS -
'
...' . . .. . . . . 1. . . .. . . .. - . , ': .. - .1 .. �,_ , 'S, , , - . i,, 1, - ', ..% : "" - -
:RESOURCE THREATS -(List others as rieede
1d)
Erosion
✓
RUSLE (Sheet & Rill ) >T
Ephemeral Gully Erosion
Classic Gully Erosion
Streambank Erosion
Damaqing Soil Deposition
Excessive Wind Erosion
Quality
Restrictive Layer I Plow Pan 1 Compaction
Low Organic Matter
Improper pH
Surface Crusting
Salt Buildup
Buildup of Toxic Metals
Pesticide/Chemical Residue Buildup
Inadequ te Nutrient Availability
LU
Quality
Sedimentation
Nutrient Runoff from Manure (Point Source)
Nutrient Runoff/Leaching from Manure Application Areas
✓
Buildup of Excessive P in Soil
Pesticide Runoff
Quantity
Inadequate Water for Livestock
Inadequa e Water for Irrigation I Plant Growth
Excess Surface / Subsurface Water
Quality
Dust from Airborne Soil Particles / Smoke
Potential for Damaging Pesticide Drift
Odor, Animal Waste Stora2e
Odor, Animal Waste Application
Condition
Plant Damage from Animal/Insect Pests
Invasive, Noxious, or Undesirable Plants
Plant DamagLDue to Soil Contaminant
Plant Damage from Excessive Traffic
Plant Damage from Airborne Contaminant
Red,,jced Yields from Inadequate Nutrients
Reduced Yields from Inadequate Water
Pasture Vegetation Overgrazed
Woodland Overstocked 1 Understocked
Plants Unsuited to Site 1 Intended Use
Loss or Degradation of Native Plant Communities
roes
iervice
lelp
7 / 1/(

/� {� I R ��
USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service
�% I v
Raleigh Field Office
Natural
4001-D Carya Drive
Resources
Conservation
Raleigh. NC 27610
g
Service
[phone]
MR CALVIN B PIPPIN
9721 PIPPIN RD
ZEBULON, NC 27597-7876
Crop
Conservation Plan
Tract: 63127
Preparer ID
steve.woodruff
CONSERVATION CROP ROTATION
Begin a two year cropping system of conventionally planted row crops. Low residue row crops such
as tobacco, cotton, and sweet potatoes are to be followed by high residue row crops such as corn,
milo, or soybeans.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
31
5.7 Ac.
1 10
1 1993
Total:
5.7 Ac.
CONSERVATION CROP ROTATION
Begin a, two year cropping system of conventionally planted row crops. Low residue row crops such
as tobacco, cotton, and sweet potatoes are to be followed by high residue row crops such as corn,
milo, or soybeans.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
4
4. S Ac.
10
1993
5
29.8 Ac.
10
1993
6
2.3 Ac.
10
1993
7
6.0 Ac.
10
1993
Total:
42.9 Ac.
CONSERVATION CROP ROTATION
Begin a two year cropping system of first year conventionally planted row crops followed by second
year small grain -double cropped conservation tilled row crops.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
1
6.2 Ac. 10
1993
Total:
6.2 Ac,
CONSERVATION CROP ROTATION
Begin a two year cropping system of first year conventionally planted row crops followed by second
year small grain -double cropped conservation tilled row crops.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
21
2.9 Ac.
10
1 1993
Total:
2.9 Ac.
6/25/2004 Page 1 of 4

CONSERVATION TILLAGE
Conservation tilled row crops will be planted with a minimum of 30% ground cover remaining on the
soil surface after planting.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
11
6.2 acre
1
1993
Total:
1 6.2 acre
Conservation tilled row crops will be planted with a minimum of 30% ground cover remaining on the
soil -surface after planting.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
21
2.9 acre
10
1993
Total: 1
2.9 acre
COVER CROP
Seed a winter cover crop of small grain, legumes, or other grasses immediately after crop harvest of
low residue producing crops such as tobacco, corn silage, sweet potatoes, etc. Leave the cover crop
on the land until 30 days before the succeeding crop is planted.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
31
5.7 Ac.
10
1993
Total:
1 5.7 Ac.
COVER CROP
Seed a winter cover crop of small grain, legumes, or other grasses immediately after crop harvest of
low residue producing crops such as tobacco, corn silage, sweet potatoes, etc. Leave the cover crop
on the land until 30 days before the succeeding crop is planted.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
4
4.8 Ac.
10
1993
5
29.8 Ac.
10
1993
6
2.3 Ac,
10
1993
7
6.0 Ac.
10
1993
Total:
42.9 Ac.
RESIDUE MANAGEMENT, SEASONAL
Maintain at least a 30% ground cover of plant residue on the soil surface from harvest until 30 days
before the succeeding crop is planted.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
1
6.2 Ac.
10
1993
Total:
6.2 Ac.
RESIDUE MANAGEMENT, SEASONAL
Maintain at least a 30% ground cover of plant residue on the soil surface from harvest until 30 days
before the succeeding crop is planted.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
21
2.9 Ac. 10
1993
Total:
1 2.9 Ac.
6/25/2004 Page 2 of 4

RESIDUE MANAGEMENT, SEASONAL
Maintain at least a 30% ground cover of plant residue on the soil surface from harvest until 30 days
before the succeeding crop is planted.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
3
5.7 Ac.
10
1993
4
4.8 Ac.
10
1993
5
29.8 Ac.
10
1993
6
2.3 Ac.
10
1993
7
6.0 Ac.
10
1993
Total:
1 48.6 Ac.
CLOSURE OF WASTE IMPOUNDMENTS
Lagoon will be closed according to the standard and specifications set forth in the design provided by
the field office. Do not begin work until you notify field office personnel.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
31 1.0 No.
1 6
1 2004
1.0 No.
Jun-25-2004
Total: 1 1.0 No.
I
1
1.0 No.
GRASSED WATERWAY
Establish grassed waterway at the approximate location shown on the conservation plan map to
provide an outlet for row water and prevent and repair gully erosion. Construct according to NRCS
standards and specifications. Design will be completed prior to construction by NRCS or Wake
SWCD. See enclosed "Job Sheet" for more information.
Planned
Field Amount Month Year
Applied
Amount Date
41
0.3 Ac.
11
1 1994
Total:
1 0.3 Ac.
CERTIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS
MR CALVIN E PIPPIN Date
CERTIFICATION OF:
District Conservationist CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Steve Woodruff Date SWCD Date
6/25/2004 Page 3 of 4

NONDISCRIMINATION STATEMENT
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national
origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all
programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape,
etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD).
To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence
Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call [phone] (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer,
6/25/2004 Page 4 of 4

Animal Waste Application Windows'
For Common Crops Which Receive Animal Waste
These application %vindows include 30 days prior to planting and greenup of Bermudagrass.
End 30 days before harvest,
Bermudagrass Begin March I" End September )
Small Grain Begin October I"
Overseeded in Bermudagrass
Corn
Begin February 15'h
End March 3151
End June 30'h
Cotton Begin March 15'h End August I"
Cucumbers -- Direct consumption Begin March I` (100 % at planting)
— For Processing Begin April Is' End May 3151
(2 seasons) Begin July 1s' End August 315t
Rve Begin September Is' End March 31"
Barley, Oats Triticale Begin September 151 End April 151h
Wheat Begin September 1st End April 30
Peanuts Begin April Is' End September 30'h
Sorghum/ Begin March 15'h End August 31s'
Sudan Grass Hay
Soybeans Begin April I" End September 15th
Tobacco — Flue Cured Begin March 15'h End June 30'h
— Burley Bei-,in May 15'I' End Au-ust 15'11
Feseue2 Begin August Is' End Jule ') I"
Dates shcnln represent stateside limits, Planting and har�cstinQ dates Van across the state and from }ear to year. ActuaI Values
shall retlect site specific conditions and in no case allo%% application rnore [Ilan either 30 days prior to plantingibreaking dormanc%
or less than 30 days before harvest. See General Permit for food crops
Mountains —limit N application during June and Jul% i no nitrogen in December and January
Piedmunt K Coastal Plain — limit N application during June and Jule / no nitrogen in Dee and Jan during severe %sinters.

N
6d

'4k
. . ........

I
Wit
17
�
-Rill:

Fn
U
jp
V.
60
-j-0
EE
j'j"
V,
I

7 ys`S'"agyc T �'_+'t',rc� sr rJT ;� �+y- h �.� "}• •� �%.�'� �': -{4� i f ~ { # r� • 'i:r ��f' �; �yrc fit'• y . ' L ..
f ,..,,y x �7:✓�•�-��i'kr �T S ly��;�t ,v �.r: ^.�i� �ti�' �� • �a s ^�
. �� Thy' `�3�` � f `�t a'"JAI �� ..Y ^'r Ry ts'' i �s�'., �� !�•dru?,�' R _-sr'.
-... .. ti � ;_,r'�• f1'i-s W". r•y��J1 !y; ���`_,.' y .t w'�.�����ry4 �., y��tt, ���1 a.. .i •
:+�:ii � - ria.♦� CT'f -0 r �.' 4 r iL ; k .^ ,„L♦ P _ �f -t 1 - C4 - • , ,,,•{ ��� -
4.Z?
.errs - -'Ra � • r U "' �: w- f"" �' r r 4� .{ T,= LR "_ ly-�Ki'SF - _ ,y * - _.
r ✓sue { 'fy?' y5 x T ���- � ��.
• �i's?'+ � �.. J • �7 ���yFi' -�ih; �E �i, l; � j• �' � ��dsyk� fi I.I.' � ! • 4 ',y,
�."s �j �'r �§S �!sy '•.� IFt}n_ . ;i ♦ , , .� � tx � �''{ ".=1r'. ��F}. � S ..
Aft
R!,'�.'� .- - -•_♦ A „yyr�y } .r:j, � 1 . llk`r'S' lS.�. 4 ;5 ar'"` " d'
h ♦ +• •+:"'^ r 3: �s" � µ.. yam' t t � .
L. .s � r _ � S Cr t�i- r� ♦ `1
#'� ! . ry' ai.f s��, - ,- �� sA • ♦ 4iff� J'� .S.L a i'i �-'��� '� S
: i� - -. k ��. � •ty1�', emir r€';�•• r �4. ,i- �_.
V•.
- a
.lam ; �i. ���_ �• r �,'�^+ .•i--di'`'kt - is � . �. .�'"'
I S All
.0 aµr�sF�tSSgLy>� 1sry �E 5 x+. . /N' , + � _ _ � � �.'�' � '� !'i .. ,a� I _ :r ��•, h � �A�� ~' tSiCl...
-ram_?� _ _ f l7*�'�' ,` ;Y';.� t • - • Y' �. �. I` ,1 S'l „dd, Lti, 5 y't
eJ��•.� �` �^ �' '; 1 "'. S i `♦h.A'r '�W a�- s - ,y1 "�- �A �ria.
r 'i(.
•, Yb __ A x -
' ~e .r qa•� S R ' � o``�
r! � � r ?��^ .�,���• � ,i��t:4`� t�,. 7'l !>f r ti �`�vfaA? x " �F s� !Ear's` r,� �r� a -
1ti ;, r�r -"Y.;r "ri ,>ku�'1:.'•.I.^+'f^,;'h. R- Y'�'S v ' ��ry 4 f'y-jiy'F:rr�"ai �4� {.
r". �n 4
� { r 1
q '9 .•1 ram` '„� �, t�•�� i
�y ,! $•1�Nhl'��oil"
J {{.d. - r Le,i>kJ�;rW,I •k� 'r+�, f� �.+
h+'-:.``,; .i�r r� .� � �-F � � - .. '�,�'. ,� �r?�ty,.. P,,;6, •,ti,r . trt, ky :..°;.:'j.fi_
. •'x �-+• :r• _ _ _ ... ,...>• rs may}} +r„F t c1y',-s...^.:.:
i
f +tw'Y� i1- '�r"-r-- : `� p1—ff7f I .,� < 4,_ 4s' •s5 ��..'_t �r._
•. � 3'M1. `�i' - _ ���� _ t � �' 4 � � •fi T`• �"� i� .•� �f rt4t�J'.
S. i.
' -jL. a . r :: .i' ' ,p•S # s
ka 1 �y rr't, `' -"x-' '•'#i —.Y a',}'
C3,.= �i• .�+��'�1ar��L.. t ��. tR F� -f^�• Lri+-�-.iC}�'V.
- a -_ y YA��'•'
"ir F r I L N' '14• '11Fi*i
A:N a� -„C y e.,
'•r '. �' 1 Y �� �� Y • tiSi rC ,�1;ti „aArr'y} s; ' � �#�'��'� ^ -.-.
t✓ -.fir 9�'„µ �� �.y�: '�' f .d° �r, ��� •� _�> Cg_
T11
its "m
Ai
F '!' `1
IS+i`n.,
g_� a �S may, w o`1 - a •. r !-'s
" k``y ••.:rr- i1��!? `11'�'��a: �.��r., �„ y � '�! y�L ± � �. ,F`-� � ti x, yY�„it,,,�'4 �y��� i'� . a � t
t� b e -`�s 1�j,' � t� :''h a' '"c" r +'G 23r •"�. r t_ .
}�� i �< r ri # `� � ' � �.Y �*.•-+_ Ott
r ! J s". w - +-°"'. ,� �" k Z,. • ,;�1 tr�3' ! {{,Pi A- "r s,' x i•S' �Ea, i i
a..i.�--
i� � jyj2 t t - Syr' �' f s '� 1 } "+'•y t 'F r # s .;
.A4' n b e}4rr7i Ark r1 t F its,
-- >- � ,:�K i s r
-logo!;'-