680014_PERMIT FILE_20171231

uCl-I LVH I Cr'. IJUI""tL L I I =ICI. 11 u49 I u • •••�
Site Requires Immediate .Atten6or-
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT _
ANIMAL FEEDLOT' OPERATIONS 1SrM VISITATION, RECORD
DATE: f , 1995
Time , ps ,
rte. !1 !
Faxm Name/Ownez-
Mailing Address:
County: ©vo" e
Integrator Phone:
On Site Representative:. Phone..
Phvsical Ad&tzs/Locadon: r �S - v Cc vo , e` pv f �j rI
Typeof pperation_ Swine Poulrry Cattle .
Design Capacity: Number of Ammals an -Site.
DEM Ce tification Number: ACE DEMI Celcation Number:.ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No . Actual Freeboard: _____Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Ts -adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No -
Crcp(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from -Dwellings? Yes, ar No,. -
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or. No.
J,e. animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS: Blue Line Stam?. Yes or No'. <; .
a iisrsal waste land applied or spray irrigated.within 25 Feet of a liSGS 41ap 131ue l.ine'1' Yes or -N&-,
-,
ariiu al' waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system or other
•,imi;ar man -inane devices? Yes or No If Yts, Please Explain.
lfsr Fic:ility maintain adequate waste aiauagerncnt xecords (volumes of rtlanure; land applied;
spray itrigared on apccific acreage With cover crop Y? Yes or No
Additional Cori ants: v a ova r u b
I r S
r _
TOTAL P.02

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Bob Hogan
Lake Hogan Farm
Box 8500 Lake Hogan Farm Rd
Chapel Hill NC 27516
Dear Bob Hogan:
�EHNR
July 11, 1997
r E
5
DEHNR RALEIGH
REGIONAL OFFICE
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 68-14
Orange County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H.0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H.0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that.levei.
Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 11000
Poultry with a liquid waste system 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
-GR
cc: • Raleigh Water-Quality.Regional_Dffice
Orange Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 3, 1997
Bob Hogan
Lake Hogan Farm
Box 8540 Lake Hogan Farm Rd
Chapel Hill NC 27516
e��
EDEHNFZ
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Lake Hogan Farm
Facility Number 68-44
Orange County
Dear Mr. Hogan:
You were notified by letter dated December 5, 1996, that you were required to designate a certified animal waste
management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that
fetter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically for your facility, Instructions for Completing
Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator, and an Application for
Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator. Our records indicate that these
completed Forms have not yet been returned to our office.
As was explained in the previous letter, a training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste
management systems involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry (with a liquid waste system). Therefore owners of
these systems were allowed to request that they be issued temporary certifications until December 31, 1997. All that
was required to receive this temporary certification was the completion of the Application Form.
For you convenience, we are sending you additional copies of the Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically
for your facility, Instructions for Completing Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste
Management System Operator, and an Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management
System Operator. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later than April
25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in locating a certified
operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management system, is a violation
of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an appropriately certified operator is designated.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for
any past or future violations for your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and Certification Group at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosures
P.O. Box 29535,N10C
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmofive Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

'i
Facility Number
Date of Inspection 119
j �,��
Time of Inspection 1�.�.__LJ 24 hr. (hh:mm)
` Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status. 94;gistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑l Certified ❑ Permitted � �,,`� or Inspection includes travel and processing)
CLrf No p rational Date Last Operated....... ?Va.l .. : .........................................................................
Farm Name:. �,.. h �' -. ...�1-..A Ya(i....... ........ _........... ..... County:.... Y .................... ..... ................... ...
Land Owner Name:. d ................... ...............�.. ...... Phone No:...... ........................_ ...._............ ........................
Facility Conctact:.... Vb....... ..... ................. Title; .......................... ..................... Phone No:..5..�Z.............
Mailing Address: ... � t ....�,1` ............... 1 .... .... C:1.46.....�!�...��.t... 2:.;1........�., .........................
OnsiteRepresentative: .......................... . ...................... . ....................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
CertifiedOperator:.......Ws..*...........»............................................................................. Operator Certificationumlger:..................................... ....
Location of Farm: "VA6 t,�] VVN � � -e ,�� ( �
Latitude Longitude �•�����
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑Yes - [I No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Continued on back

w _
Facility Number:., .T ...—...�,..,
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons alld/or Ifolding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10.
............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
............................
-❑ Yes
❑ No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
erste
Application
M.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type........................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For
Cel:titied JEacilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comrnents,(re fer to questton`#) Explain any YES answers`and/or 'any recommendations or any,other comments'.§
Use.drawmgsxof facility to lietter explain situations -(use addit�orial pages as necessary)
_VVCX14 . �o�Ca�t VW e -6 'k, $h% . —I"_ `e'V'a 1 g 4
a ro cef ow
MW 0' c t
a
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2.Gi
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

-3.. "'f r � ....yrr... r5'�..` � .��/"'•f i S.}r.',i` t.�r-. ••' s't.. r,U,.-., -
r . �.- Z,� --7 �^.i. t`!+?.+; _... �.. � y,ti ` N..r�.'.a� '1 y� w^.. �• �. {�yy:Y.... r f
IotC
Q'[toutine .O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow -tie of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection lei
Facility Number (cl
Time of Inspection 1(` 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: 96stered_ ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
9"Noot Operational Date Last Operated: ...... Gt.bf?5.A....... L... -�: ...... 5� T. .....................................................:.......
Farm Name:..L.Ya��.......Y....�Ji!. ......................... County: .... ' ....... ............... , .......... ........ ...
'
Land Owner Rante:.. ...... . { ....... Phone No:................................................................................
L. ........ ... ......L......
Facility Conctact:....��..•„{��?............. �........�.... .... .: Title • Phone No: 0Q(Q3z..1 2...1...................
Mailing Address:...
'KA.....X�q.....I� ......a �.5___ ,` ............ .......
} Onsite Representative: ..... ..........._. ...... Integrator:
.......................
Certified Operator: ...I....... Operator Certification umber• .•..........
Location of Farm: ......1- ..........................................................II.............. p
A"x\'%k1' .VVt 1t'1v1�itr �t[iS�S _ (s�� Csmv.uk�u A
Latitude �•��Longitude ��• ��'
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray.field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Watee? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on beck

w° i r°: ,:9'1` t-�s'Rv wt. 'hGti .r �,.r --w. -•-'.'Y'*i.'w r,n�`F'.�-:1'r.r jf`.�'i0'.'LitFG.�`-•• -„�, �. ..._ � ... ...-..y�,x �. i;.'v.S��i"v'=il;i..'y„t,1`F,'�:fi-.-.li"'"rK-�..� . �,.., yT�'v+`dJ"•��:!` rP�.�;f�'ti'!1',.l
4 Fr
` lb
'Facility Number: ,.'Q....—...��},.
6. Is facility not in compli6ce with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
• k, w
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? [:]Yes ❑ No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structijees (Lagoonsand/or 1{olding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (frceboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Stricture 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10.
............................ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
............................
❑ Yes
❑ No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If,in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
4
'
15.
Crop type............................................................................................ ...................................................................................... ..............................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
-
• Vii, : n, x? `
. 17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑:Na
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No'.' '
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For
Certified Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
comment ..,(reser to question 4) hxptam any x tri' answers ancuor any recommendations or any otner comments
AgW .t,
Use drawings of faciIiry to better.eXpla�n.situations: (use aifditiona! pages as necessary)
V O e.K t 5 . �} i 4 W w -r 5 4
�sl.�z� a�-c� Jc�.. Ind was sold 0 LP_1( )
-� olda cb _
1 i V\rl'ti