660030_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Facility
Waste Management Plan Changes
ko -3D
I
Farm Z C FAf� Z 7-- 30
This farms Waste Management Plan has made the following changes:
❑ Crop changes
❑ Wetted Acres
❑ Increased Acreage
❑ Decreased Acreage
❑ Changed Irrigation Design
❑ Change in Farm type
❑ Plan based on 3 Years On Farm Records
Other
Comments:
Date

It
Murphy -Brown, LLC 06/06/2003 P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Smithfield-Carroll's Farm 27-30 Amendment
County: Northampton
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 4000
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Anaerobic Lagoon
>180 days
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( I.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain Is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code Crop
A Barley
B Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D Corn - Grain
E Corn - Silage
F Cotton
G Fescue - Grazed
H Fescue - Hay
I Oats
J Faye
K Small Grain - Grazed
L Small Grain - Hay
M Grain Sorghum
N Wheat
O Soybean
P Pine Trees
Lbs N utilized I unit yield
1.6 lbs N / bushel
50 lbs N 1 ton
50 lbs N 1 ton
1.25 lbs N 1 bushel
12 lbs N / ton
0.12 lbs N 1 lbs lint
50 lbs N 1 ton
50 lbs N / ton
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
50 lbs N 1 acre
50 lbs N / acre
2.5 lbs N 1 cwt
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
4.0 lbs N I bushel
40 Ibs N / acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4 of 8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract Hydrant
Type
Crop
In/hr
* inches
subA&B
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
subC&D
Caroline
C
0.4
1
subE
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
subF&G
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
subH
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
subl&J
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
subK-Q
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
#REF! subR&S
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
6of8

Additional Comments:
The acreage listed on this amendment is the balance of the total field acreage
minus the wetted acres at this site. The areas not covered by the conventional
irrigation system are being entered into the pumping records as sub fields
so that the acres can be claimed when making application with an Aerway
machine. -- -
7of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm:
Owner:
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
Smithfield-Carroll's Farm 27-30 Amendment
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Ilwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. Ilwe know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
Ilwe understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Signature:
Date
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: t ¢3
Date
Name of Technical Specialist:
Affiliation:
Address:
Dawn Williamson
Murphy :Brown, LLC
2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone: [phone]
Signature: ff —�. l/lJi (-�� _LO -
Date
8of8

Waste Management Plan Changes
Asti re �', —&Juj 0 LLC.
Facility Farm FP A, 2--1 —3 O_
This farms Waste Management Plan has made the following changes:
❑ Crop changes
❑ Wetted Acres
�ticreased Acreage
❑ Decreased Acreage
❑ Changed Irrigation Design
❑ Change in Farm type
❑ Plan based on 3 Years On Farm Records
❑ Other
Comments:
Date
CD
m
F
r_
ci
70
c
r`
J�
m
'

Murphy -Brown, LLC 01128/2004 2822 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Farms 27- 30
County: Northam ton
Farm Ca aci :
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 4000
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure: Anaerobic L
Storage Period:
Application Method:
>180 days
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, its, tong, etc.): "Based on Site Specific Data
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 galtyr
galtyr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 galtyr
gal/yr
4000
Farrow to Finish
8021.125 galtyr
32,084,500 galtyr
Wean to Feeder
223 galtyr
galtyr
Feeder to Finish
986 galtyr
ga r
Total 32,084,500 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced r Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibstyr
Ibstyr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibstyr
Ibstyr
4000
Farrow to Finish
11.39 Ibstyr
45,560 Ibstyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibstyr
lbstyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibs
Ibs/
Total 45,560 lbstyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 256.8
Total N Required 1st Year: 91550
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 91,550.00
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 46,660.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (46,990.00)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop In the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.

Reception Area Specifications
Tract Field Irrigated Soil tat Crop Time to 1st Crop tat Crop Lbs N/Ac Lba N Tata1 Ibs N
Acreage Code Yield The WUnit Residual IA- Unitized
at Ibs N
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs WAc Uba N Total
Coda Yield be N/Unit Residual /Ac Utilized
Total
Lba WAc
Taw lbs N
tar
Utilized
1023
A
5.2
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
1690
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
50
260
375
1950
B
7.2
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325K2340
L
Se -Mar1
50
50
360
375
2700
C
5.3
Caroline
C
Mar -Set
6.0
50
300
L
Se -Mar
1
50
50
265
350
1855
D
8.3
Caroline
C
Mar-S t
6.0
50
300
L
Se t-Mar
1
50
50
415
350
2965
E
8.2
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Se
6.5
50
325
L
Se t-Mar
1
50
So
410
375
3075
F
4
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Se
6.5
50
325
L
Se -Mar
1
50
50
200
375
1500G
6.9.
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Se
6.5
50
325
L
Se t-Mar
1
50
50
345
375
2587.5
H
7.4
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Se
6.5
50
325
L
Se t-Mar
1
50
50
370
375
2775
1
25.4
Norfolk
C
MarSe
6.5
50
325
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
50
1270
375
9525
1
16.1
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
5232.5
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
50
805
375
6037.5
K
4.6
Norfolk
C
Mar -Se
6.5
50
325 j
1495
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
50
230
375
1725
L
4.6
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
1495
L
Se -Mar
1
50
50
230
375
1725
M
24
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
7800
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
50
1200
375
9000
N
14.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
4842.5
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
50
745
375
5$87.5
p 1
4.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
1592.5
LSept-Mar
1
50
50
245
375
1837.5
P 1
4.7
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
1 6.5
50
325
1527.5
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
50
235
375 1
1752.5
Q
j 4.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Se
6.5
50
325
1592.5
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
$0
245
375
1837.5
R
2.8
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
910
L
Sept -Ma
1
50
50
140
375
1050
S
2.4
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
750
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
50
120
375
900
1
20.1
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
6532.5
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
50
1005
375
7537.5
2
16.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
5492.5
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
So
845
375
6337.5
3
9.3
Blanton
C
Mar -Set
4.5
50
225
2092.5
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
50
465
275
2557.5
4
27.B
Nor/Bla
C
Mar -Set
5.5
50
275
7645
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
50
1390
325
9035
5
20.9
Blanton
C
Mar -Sept
4.5
50
225
4702.5
L
Sept -Mar
1
50
50
1045
275
6747.6
Totals: 280.8 78710 12NO 91550
3(a) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers In some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields { i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda}; forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with strand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 lbs N 1 bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs; N / ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N / ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 lbs N 1 bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 lbs N 1 ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N / Ibs lint
G
Fescue - Grazed
50 lbs N / ton
H
Fescue - Hay
50 lbs N I ton
I
Oats
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 lbs N / acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 lbs N 1 acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N / cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N 1 bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N 1 acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
In the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PAN rlanimal Farm Tota r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
Farrow to Feeder 1
4000 Farrow to Finish 4.1 16400
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 16400 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 82000 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 273 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to com at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 656 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of Irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
`This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan Invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract -�ydrant
Type
Crop
inthr
* Inches
1023 A�
Norfolk'
C
0.5
1
B
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
C
Caroline
C
0.4
1
D
Caroline
C
0.4
1
E
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
F
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
G
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
H
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
1
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
J
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
K
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
L
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
M
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
N
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
O
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
P
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
Q
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
R
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
S
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
1
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
2
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
3
Blanton'
C
0.35
1
4
Nor/Bla
C
0.5
1
5
Blanton
C
0.35
1

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: Farms 27- 30
Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
Ilwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. Itwe know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
Itwe understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Signature:
Date
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature: Nt2zf . . 9 f ' Z� —r>L
Name of Technical Specialist: Dawn Williamson
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC.
Address: 2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856
--wvw»Lw rvvw
Telephone: [phone]
Signature:��

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of°the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recievinq crop type, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur off -site or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion. —
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.

Fs t J ,ems t Y r. r{g1 a° • .j- r I i f e,
4 tax N J.�.
I' �si ` �, '�• S - rf,' ! FG��.• r}'b I 1,., � SkLa '}'+ }4:}.e � Y' � / �' y�,
sr R ja a t iVon
� �'�" t' q•'ew fr� � l,M 1r sF � , � 'f i
Hsi! Z IN
ON
p� sr
.' `"F � �s�;x f�,�kw'�'►� a ; ' 1q �y ,'h' {`t �°" p't r ri. � � iM'�.. r1as�J; , a ": .
.:' ''.3 1JJ,��,,i�yy -{. Cy9i'Y• y ; ' � _ N ' . r .r.. - f � ; • k_ q
y4i�
j": rP�r��•ai}y rk ��`.
's1,7 got
`r.1
�..
1" i
x? i - rb�,q � ��rs�4�-q'f.'•i' !=��'i, �r�L�� � �, n J ,.. .w'
_ . -0r�a5 0 '."� 5�� !.f 3 1t ,.,sff„a �ti r, t ' • ,v. r;: ,, a �.�t.�" �-�
�� �' f,i^} r �` i' I it, � �•�'_ i i�' 'L J„. } pe. � '._ a �' �•
st �"f�_�'y ��^'R-,µ��'�,- � `i: �l i s r, r�N, d;. 'a ir•-`�.I 1 + �'.' 1 ,�.� `s:
•� �,� n�`}e.,t�Y9. �,�� �,�� S �• ' r o rr. lZ � V }, I � � �� } d
��. ''6y�'`i y�� fi�+�f'• � er :4 r� . f. � 3 s .7a r.l
i .aF4 -5„{} [€ d,ktl ,�-,_ 1fs.G 7- _a +.i• f �J 1 v y '+ `2
�iKaYq�1p"F��� ~fti,,;'
Y+�' C'� -. �L +.',y,tFS'. 1. n " -3. a�; ,r r� � � .� �,tl 4 Jt a �. 2y r �E'l � j ' �•+r _,
owl
..........
''J {" '. 9 � ". -k• ;�.. , iIt
rA i h 5s V' e
+ � r' � a9 ♦ : i �w� a' y,e� e tl k '�. Y � asp „� i+ 1 } . , h,
.'�K �� i._ „� _ Ir 1 •!'e'q Y i F•If { r;J . r e i[ s ,,�' EJ -° i.+ 3 y
fa
„ • 5+ � i t�� 1 � j s' d. r 4 i •. s
.cur .rtw~•4 't

w
s''•L1�
ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM-,'��e�'-
v ,.^ ,
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number NCA266030County North HamptonYear 2003
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) 27-30
Operator in Charge for this FacilityKel Terry Certification # 18514
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during tN 'past,caldho ear
X Yes No. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Ali, ifarrimal waste was
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste w ,s Ylandled.
Part I: Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields 2r Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): F-271P-NIATotal Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
210.60
2. Total number of Fields R'llor Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: F-27-NIATotal Acres on which waste was applied 210.60
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
47,038.07
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit: 75,610.00
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year 0 tons ❑ or gallons _ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
NIA Information provided by May 1 2004
71argest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest NIA
Smallest NIA
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers)
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable: Murphy Brown, LLC
Part II: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during ❑ Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.

10 2. *The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from 9-Yes ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past [Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during ❑ Yes E 0
past calendar year. 3e--e �D�A` s �es,1- -� L1�.$�, '%���•
5. There was no PAN application o any fields or crops at this facility greater than the EKes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year. �/
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. L� Yes ❑ No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume ❑ Yes ❑ No
for which the lagoon was designed.
*NIA Will be done and on file by April 24, 2004
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to the Certification. ❑ Yes ❑ No
*NIA Will be done and on file by April 24, 2004
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the [Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year? ErYes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during ❑ Yes
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all�Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were [fYes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
0
Date
D to
(if different from Permittee)

ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM r'
AMENDMENT�,�,
Year:2003 7�?
Permit Number: NCA266030
County: North Hampton
Facility #: 66-30
Facility Name: Farms 27-30
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the
previous year:
Wean — Feeder:
• Feeder — Finish:
Farrow — Wean:
Farrow — Feeder:
Boar Stud:
Wean - Finish:
Commercial Nursery_
Total Average: 3,079
0

Murphy —Brown LLC PO Drawer 856
2822 Hwy. 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Tel: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
November 23, 2004
NCDENR
Aquifer Protection Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Attn: S. Jay Zimmerman
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Dear Mr. Zimmerman,
In response to the Notice of Violation received by our office on November 22, 2004 specific to
issues regarding the 2003 annual certification form for Farm 27-30, Facility Number 66-30 in Northampton
county, please consider the following.
Murphy -Brown was required to submit well over 100 annual reports to the Division. To
streamline the process, the field representative (OIC) responsible for each farm submitted the necessary
information to complete the annual report form. This information was then entered into an electronic shell
of the form to insure that the information was legible. Finally, the forms were reviewed and signed by the
appropriate persons prior to being sent to the Division. As to the question of Mr. Hassle being the
signatory as the OIC for this farm, Mr. Hassle is the manager of the field operations for this farm and is
ultimately responsible for compliance with this farm's permit. It seemed appropriate that he sign as the
operator of the system. There was no intent whatsoever to supply a fraudulent signatory.
I have supplied a revised annual certification form for your review. You will find that the OIC
signature has been revised. While we appreciate the fact that annual reporting is an essential element of the
NPDES reporting requirements and understand the importance of providing accurate information, we feel
that there should be some latitude for situations in which there was not an intent to defraud. I am very
disappointed with the tone of your letter, as it seems to suggest that there was intent to provide untrue
statements in the annual report. Given what 1 feel is a clear record of being more than forthcoming with the
Division on reporting requirements, and the fact that there were no problems to my knowledge with the
vast majority of the annual reports submitted by Murphy -Brown, I ask that you accept the revised forms
and rescind the NOV issued against this farm.
If there are any questiOx concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Y,
of Environmental Compliance

ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM o
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number NCA266030 County North Hampton\/ ED
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) 27-30 MAR 4 1 ZOO,
Operator in Charge for this Facility Kel Terry Certification # 18514 WA�ERQI] Ti �� cp. -
a z �cmp}, nt
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the pWtWPear%dar year
X Yes No. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste was
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I: Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): F-27/P-N/A Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
210.60
2. Total number of Fields R'or Pulls . ❑ (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: F-27-N/A Total Acres on which waste was applied 210.60
3. Total pounds of PIant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
47,038.07
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit: 75,610.00
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year ❑ tons ❑ or gallons (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
N/A Information provided by Nlav 1. 2004
7.1-argest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest it
Smallest
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since tU only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers)
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable: Murphy Brown LLC
Part II: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO". PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during Erres ❑ No
the past calendar year.

2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from eyes ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past VIYes ❑ No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds apt this facility during ❑ Yes No
past calendar year. Sec P2"
dA's 5tni- pro Zal c;�4. e�:oral p�F'"cc o
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the 1..k'Yes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year. %
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year. E Yes ❑ No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume ❑ Yes ❑ No
for which the Iagoon was designed.
*N/A Will be done and on file by April 24, 2004
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to the Certification. ❑ Yes ❑ No
*N/A Will be done and on rile by April 24, 2004
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the"Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
14. SoiI pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year? E Yes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during ❑ Yes No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality. *see /
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all 2Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
es ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Murphy -Brown LLC
Permittee Name andiTitle (type or print)
Si ature o ittee Date
Signature of Operator in Charge Date
(if different from Permittee)

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
FILE ACCESS RECORD
wy
SECTIO J DATEITIME�
NAME GlJ�ll r REPRESENTING
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the _Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public
records in our custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the
responsibility to the public to safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program
obligations. Please read carefully the following before signing the form.
1. Due to the large public demand for file access, we request that you call at least a day in
advance to schedule an appointment for file review so you can be accommodated.
Appointments are scheduled between :00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m on Tuesd y ed_nesday and
Thursday. Viewing time ends at 4:45 p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view
the files to the extent that time and staff supervision are available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name or incident number, as appropriate.
The number of files that You mayreview at one appointment will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits.
Cost per copy is $0.05 cents for ALL copies, front and back will be $0.10 cents per copy.,
Payment is to be made by check, money order, or cash in the administrative offices.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU RECEIVED THEM. Files may not be taken
from the office. No briefcases, large totes, etc..are permitted in the file review area. To
remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor for
which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $25.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
6. The customer must present a photo ID, sign -in, and receive a visitor sticker prior to reviewing
files.
FACILITY NAME
2. ► l rf 3 V
3.,,�5_ ��G it _ .
4.
5.
Ai at a an Name of FirmlBusiness Date
Please ach a business card to this form if available
COUNTY
D R 9,4
� anti d -7 -3
-7 /3 r°,
Time In Time Out

PAT MCCRORY
Governor
��" DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Water Resources
CNVIRONMENFAL QUALWe
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
November 30, 2016
CERTIFIED MAIL 7012 0470 0001 3841 1951
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R. O. Britt
Murphy -Brown LLC
P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Murphy -Brown Farms 27-30
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS660030
NOV-2016-PC-0560
Director
On November 16, 2016, the Raleigh Regional Office Division of Water Resources received a
complaint from Mr. Christian Breen with the Water Keeper Alliance stating that wastewater
ponding and runoff was actively occurring at the subject Murphy -Brown facility. The complaint
was conveyed via phone and by email correspondence which included photographs taken from
the air by Mr. Rick Dove, Senior Advisor of the Water Keeper Alliance on this same date.
On the morning of November 17, 2016, Mr. Buster Towell of this Office arrived on site to
investigate the complaint. The following observations were made:
Wastewater applications had occurred on November 16, 2016 by both a center pivot and
traveling gun on to fields adjacent to the Farm # 28 Unit of the Gaston Complex. There was
wastewater ponded in the tracks of the center pivot as well as in a low lying area at the edge of
the field near the wood line. There were two areas on either side of the woods where wastewater
flowed off the application field and into the woods for approximately 50 feet. This event did not
result in any discharge to surface waters.
Please note that the above described incident constitutes a violation of Permit Condition 11.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS "4. Land application rates shall be in
accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the agronomic rate
of the nutrient concern for the receiving crop. In no case shall Iand application rates result in
excessive ponding or any runoff during any given application event."
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
919 791.4200

Mr. R.O. Britt
NOV-2016-PC-0560
Page 2
Violations of your Certificate of Coverage and Certified Animal Waste Plan may be subject to
civil penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day. Please respond to this Notice in writing within thirty
(30) days of your receipt. Your response should include a detailed plan as to how you intend to
permanently eliminate the aforementioned violations from occurring in the future.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice you may contact Buster Towell at (919) 791-
4200.
Sincerely,
iL�T-
Rick Bolich, L.G. Assistant Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Resources, Water Quality
Regional Operations. Section
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Northampton Soil & Water Conservation District
DWR AFO Central Files
RRO-WQROS Files
J

PAT MCCRORY
Water Resources
CrIVIROMM11WAL QUALITY
cave/mar
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretory
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
November 30, 2016
CERTIFIED MAIL 7012 0470 0001 3841 1951
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. R. 0. Britt
Murphy -Brown LLC
P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Murphy -Brown Farms 27-30
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS660030
NOV-2016-PC-0560
Orreaar
On November 16, 2016, the Raleigh Regional Office Division of Water Resources received a
complaint from Mr. Christian Breen with the Water Keeper Alliance stating that wastewater
ponding and runoff was actively occurring at the subject Murphy -Brown facility. The complaint
was conveyed via phone and by email correspondence which included photographs taken from
the air by Mr. Rick Dove, Senior Advisor of the Water Keeper Alliance on this same date.
On the morning of November 17, 2016, Mr. Buster Towell of this Office arrived on site to
investigate the complaint. The following observations were made:
Wastewater applications had occurred on November 16, 2016 by both a center pivot and
traveling gun on to fields adjacent to the Farm # 28 Unit of the Gaston Complex. There was
wastewater ponded in the tracks of the center pivot as well as in a low lying area at the edge of
the field near the wood line. There were two areas on either side of the woods where wastewater
flowed off the application field and into the woods for approximately 50 feet. This event did not
result in any discharge to surface waters.
Please note that the above described incident constitutes a violation of Permit Condition H.
OPERATION AND MAINM►NCE REQUIREMENTS "4. Land application rates shall be in
accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the agronomic rate
of the nutrient concern for the receiving crop. In no case shall land application rates result in
excessive ponding or any runoff during any given application event."
Stele of North Carolina i Environmental poahry j Water Resomn 1 Mciah Rc&nak Ofiico
1629 NWI jervice Center 1 Ralcish, Noah Carolina 17699.1626
9197914200
1

Mr. R.O. Britt
NOV-2016•PC-0560
Page 2
Violations of your Certificate of Coverage and Certified Animal Waste Plan may be subject to
civil penalties of up to $25,000.00 per day. Please respond to this Notice in writine within thirty
(30) days of your receipt. Your response should include a detailed plan as to how you intend to
permanently eliminate the aforementioned violations from occurring in the future.
1f you have any questions regarding this Notice you may contact Buster Towell at (919) 791-
4200.
Sincerely,
i-L�T
Rick Bolich, L.G. Assistant Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Resources, Water Quality
Regional Operations Section
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Northampton Soil & Water Conservation District
DWR AFO Central Files
RRO-WQROS Files

Smithfield,
600A food. 'KtspoytsibW
January 6, 2017
Mr. Rick Bolich
L. G, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Resources, Water Quality
Regional Operations Section
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Murphy -Brown Farms 27-30
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS660030
NOV-2016-PC-0560
Mr Bolich,
Robert Q. Britt
Senior Environmental Resource Manager
Smithfield Hog Production, North Region
Smithfield Hog Production
P.O. Sox 1240
Waverly, Vdrgin€a 23890
[phone] tel
[phone] fax
1804) 731-9603mob3e.
This following is in response to the Notice of Violation letter dated November 30, 2016 for Murphy -Brown
Farms 27-30, Certificate of Coverage Number AWS660030.
On November 16, 2016 there were three irrigation events that tools place at Murphy -Brown Farms 27-30. Two
of which were mentioned in your letter, one on field BB and a second on field I. The third event that was not mentioned
was on held R Each of these three events are separated by significant distance and geography. The ponding water in
question is in the area of field I only. A map identifying these separate application fields is attached. The application
rate for, Field I for the date in question was 0.195 inches per acre. This is significantly below maximum allowed 1.0
inches per acre.
A sample of the contents of the standing water in Field 1 was taken on November 16, 2016. The results of that sample s
are attached. The results of this same clearly show there was no lagoon effluent in the sample. The pivot did not operate
in the area of the field that contained standing water on November 16, 2016. The most current lagoon analysis from the ,tt
lagoon that was being pumped on the date in questing is also included for comparison.
The following actions will be taken to remediate the events in question.
1. The operator will be retrained to ensure all applications are in accordance with Permit requirements,
2. The center pivot tire tracks will be inspected and any low areas filled to eliminate the potential for ponding.
3. Any low areas In the field that would present the opportunity for ponding water will be graded and filled.
If you have questions or comments regarding this matter please contact me at any time.
Sincerely
R.O. Britt
Senior Environmental Resource Manager
Smithfield Hog Production, North Region
Enc: Attachment A: Map -Murphy -Brown LLC Farms 27-30
Attachment B: Sample of Standing Water in Field I
Attachment C: Sample of Lagoon Analysis Farm 29 Secondary
ro br it t @ s m It hf ie I d. co m
www, s m i t h f i eld f o o d s. tom

VIIaypofnit.
ANALYTICAL
Murphy -Brown LLC
POB 1240
Attachment 8: Sample of Standing Water in Field I
7621 Whitepins Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main $04-743-9401 * Fax [phone].
wWwmaypointanelytIcal,com
LAND APPLICATION ANALYSIS
Grower: i Report No: 16-348-0213
Smithfield HP Cuit No: 71077
Date ROW: 12/20/2016
VVMVOny VA 20090
Page: I of 1
i FQ; Date Rood: 12/13/2018
LabNumber: 61241 Sample ld I. Smithfield HP
4�v
a g,
Diu !�Y
m, grg-101! )INNIN134
0
E`121111.ff
T E
1� -
-10 17
10TED 00
MV6 t4 K, 714,
Aminonlalcall-N %
Cw6luin's.ce. %
�46d]!Urn, -Na' ppm
lxll-�iiiiiiiiiiiii
Aluffilnum Al ppm
Mi wck U1, iq F. Z T WE; 1§, 1
777
Comments
Calculation Calculation from lab derived data.
EPAI 00 Standard Methods for the Analysts of Water and Wastewater, 1997
RMMA Recommended Methods of Manure Analysis, Peters at at, 2002,.In Press
SW USEPA, SW-846' Test Methods for -Evaluating Solid Wastes, Physical/Chernical Methods, 3rd Ed.
Current Revision
Pauric MoGroary

Attachment C: Sample of Lagoon Analysis Farm 29 Secondary
NCVA=AwonowleUr rim PtroM [9[9}738,MS Wdni*: www 304Mdagropoereii FY17-1tM8M
Pret iC&e Cal"t
R o Britt Advisor.
Mw tly a mR'e i.LC - Waverly
Waste ReportDiv
g
PO Box 1240
Waverly, VA 2389E3
-4,���Y�•
09=476 Romhut 09 /2M6 caoplmed 10103=6
Morewpon U I
Fa m 85m(1) mwi finks to tidphA kdonnation
Saab tnforae Lion HubiN t and Odw liasuremeris
Nb oaen go (aomf P ftW Kam) Ca f oo A7 &mS S &PW Fe faom) Are boW bi IIaom? Ov fern) B fPrd Ala fParrl C favor)
Sire dD: 29S Total N 24.7 Boo 4&6 28.1
22.5 1.24 0.14 OM M 31 OM 168
vwajs a Codes AtS
Desar4Wk r ToterfWdahlN 133
arms lagoon Uci PH OW(M) SS i10-6sotm%
Fc Onvu* CCEI%) ALE(1OOO 921.) CN
bxr!lar* N
NFiNV 7.79
C
MOO-N
4rt wic N Nr Born} Cd & wn) Pb &m* At &wrd
Urea
Se lean) Li &PW AS *wd Cr hoot) Co f mp Cl fto) Aio ftm7
egtirmaft of Nutrients Aradakie iar Fk= Crop (Ib / 1000 gat)
otber Ekmmmft Ob f 1000 gat)
APAVCa&xt mod N P205 K2O Ca ft S Fe Afn ZLt
far B Afb C7 Na Ne Cd Pb Al Se Li
irsiga5on OM 147 6M GM OM 0.19 Ohl T tk01
T oAi 1: a0
Agronamisrs C4mmak=
Kristin A- t-ticics 913Qf20T6 2:53 PM
North Cw6hla
i
Reprogwar * dthe ttret n this rsport PM92ftz%bQif9Anqdw
ttxou9t, a gash loran the ttii x& Cw*= Tubawo Trust FUM CM-n-0o.
?gym kymfor =zg Wwwo c wvi = w xrm' e= and safeguard atvvoarnattd quloy-
- Skw Troxh7 Cumn stow of

Towell, Buster
From:
May, David
Sent:
Monday, November 21, 2016 11:12 AM
To:
Towell, Buster
Cc:
Salyer, Marlene
Subject:
Rick Dove Contact
[phone]
[e-mail]
David May
Regional Supervisor— Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Department of Environmental Quality — Division of Water Resources
252-948-3939 office
david.mayO,ncdenr.gov
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
:.. Nothing Compares.-,. -
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
I- t YY,-
bY xem 0 W44 ay�zt� OY3
�atd o;-s�7
lq 0 V - ; a ld -P C-- 65-G 6
I

Flight report —November 16, 2016
At 12:25 hours on November 16, 2016, 1 departed the airfield at New Bern for a flight over two swine facilities of
the WH Group operating as Murphy 27-30 and 33. Both are located near Roanoke Rapids on the NC/SC
boarder Facilities 27-30 were located at N36 32 12.6, W077 37 20.4 and facility 33 was located at N36 14
29.9, W077 10 29.5,
1 arrived ovei facilities 27-30 at about 1:20 PM and took pictures and video for approximately 15
minutes. These pictures are set forth in the attached folders.
My observations over facilities 27-30 revealed lagoons at very low levels. These levels are likely causing the
swine contents to receive inadequate treatment. Also, it was difficult to understand how these lagoons could
be so low in view of what appeared to be very limited use of the available spray field areas for waste
application. Moreover, the limited areas being used for waste application did not appear to support crop
production at agronomic rates. It was also noted that tanker trucks were seen discharging to one lagoon that
was near empty at this facility. A number of trucks are moving swine waste from a WH Group facility (Murphy
Farm 33) to a lagoon located at these facilities (Murphy Farms 27-30). 1 also noted that the lagoon receiving
tanker truck waste was heavily eroded at the place of discharge application. This discharge was being
accomplished by simply opening the spigot of the tanker trucks and allowing the waste to run across a rocky
surface of the lagoon berm.
My flight first circled the facility at 2,200 feet. It later descended to 1,000 feet. The odor of swine waste was
detected at both altitudes.
At two locations at facilities 27-30, a suspected discharge to surface waters in violation of the Clean Water Act
was observed. These are shown in the attached pictures. An immediate report of this potential illegal activity
was passed to the Waterkeeper representatives and the state was notified. later, a limited number of pictures
were forwarded to state officials to aid in their investigation at this facility.
Upon completion of the observation at these facilities (Murphy 27-3030-33), 1 flew over to where the tankers
were loading swine waste at WH Group/Murphy facility (Murphy Farm 33). There, I observed the tankers
loading swine waste from what appeared to be a mostly full lagoon. After photographing this activity, I turned
my attention at this site to an area where three bladder structures were located next to a lagoon. These
bladders appeared to be ruptured. The depression in the earth were these bladders were located contained a
putrid looking liquid that may be seeping into the ground water. It was also noted that a pipe from the adjacent
lagoon ran from the lagoon to the bladder area, I have not observed this situation before and have no idea of its
purpose or possible consequences. It certainly was very unusual.
At about 2:15 1 departed the area and returned to the air field at New Bern.
As previously state, pictures demonstrating the matters noted above are attached.
Rick
Dove
Senior
Advisor
Waterkeeper Alliance

'7 D,
4 A J,QC3
B A 0, 3 A
25D
IOB3
,'I 7�
31A
31 A
r3 3 A
1083.- 36Brl
C
1 0c
2 -3
B 3, '1 -, "� '0 A B.
Fr 4?B 40A 3 w
-4 1' OB3 1'033 31A
Is ----26B
'S:B2
1 Jr CaB!
B
I GOA
jot -A
C,� B
h er
:Gxc A,,
j
Bi RaA—
RaA., G o�,\,
BOB
WtE
E3
X
R
)17= i Ji
-A
GXB
.1 WI.E,
A INt E�
Ab-A RaA NOB
Rai RaA Wh
CaA
i - :Z i-lt D 60C
NoS �dc R
C"8A
Lt-L)
RaA ) ). �'l I \""., NOE
WaA
k "N Ll
d
GxB CaS—NOA A
—OB
B GYE;
lEie, r Ilk
0 BOB
L y c GxB--
If TUB GOIA
RaA 3x B�. � I., % 0
G B �%, BOB I N C
NqB
30.541249c lourGuid lon

Towell, Buster
From: Towel[, Buster
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 9:32 AM
To: Icbreen@waterkeeper,org'
Subject: Northampton county fly over Wednesday 11-16-16
Christian:
I investigated this incident yesterday AM. Although the wastewater was ponded, it did not reach any surface waters. It
did flow into the woods in two locations for about 50 feet.
The farm crew was instructed to pump the waste from the low area back to the top of the spray fields and were
encouraged to place several check dams around the area to try to keep this from happening again. We do have permit
condition violation and I will work on an NOV for this issue.
Thanks
Buster Towell, Senior Environmental Specialist
Raleigh Regional Operations Section
Department of Water Resources
919-791-4239 office
984-232-1220 mobile
[e-mail]
3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1628
U'r-M
- �-"-Nothing Compares--%,_
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

(Type of Visit: Compliance I;nsp�qc U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: O Routine Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: G Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: 1'}l% j ,$ F}-e^- :�e3 Q Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C&O ! & -t e—N Title:
Onsite Representative: 1!21 *0/e 1z(GA4r c4S 0y1
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Dcsign
Dr, Poult Caaci
La ers
Current
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
P,o P.
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
I
Beef Brood Cow
Oturkey Poults
Other Other
Region:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operati0 Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure Application Field ❑ Other: rt( h 0 ELY h �� •� 5
a. Was the conveyance man-made? &Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesRP
NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑Yes NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge'?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Nu?nber: ZZ - 3,6 1 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t at, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes!No
No A ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence ofWind (Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): (3Q-r Ifr► k A4 , 3m g , 44I j OV-Iced
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ YesVND
NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers W ather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections udge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 3 fi jDate of Inspection:
i
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No 11116NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments',
,(refer to question #):.Explain An YES answers and/or, any additional recommeridations;or,any oth%r3eonitments.';
Used raw'tngi,'6f facility to better explain' situations (use add itionalkpages as necessary). .
ev t' P- 4a-r� 64 p#ef uS
lec
Ond ��S �� n 546va-/ 4,`04 s 4,
174260
Ir-ee-0/QYc.7� S f4�njP
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 41a4 -5 ,{ c e-PL/!�
Page 3 of 3
Phone: `7�'/- y20&
Date: r % r
21412015

NCDEN Rf
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natel Resources
Pat McCrory f8 E?,§Wrla, M
Governor SeA
December 30, 2014
Murphy -Brown LLC
Farms 27-30
PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398-0856
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS660030
Farms 27-30
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Northampton County
Dear Murphy -Brown LLC:
In accordance with your December 22, 2014 request to change operation type without exceeding the
permitted steady state live weight, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC)
issued to Murphy -Brown LLC, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system
in accordance with General Permit AWG 100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for Farms 27-30, located in Northampton County, with a swine animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 49286 Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
This COC shall be effective from the date.of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS660030 dated October 1, 2014. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility.- Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Maii Service Center. Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone: [phone] Intemei. http:/1www.ncdenr.gov/
4n Equal Opparlunily t 4wmative :c::cn �_Imrlaye, - Made in pail ny recycled paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Wakefield, VA National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: http://www.weather.gov/akq/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 919-791-4200. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at (9I9) 807-6464.
Sincerely,
for Thomas A. Reeder
Director, Division of Water Resources
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
JKaleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Northampton County Health Department
Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWS660030)
AFO Notebooks
Murphy -Brown LLC

Murphy -Brown, LLC
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
County:
Farm Caoac
4/9/2009
2822 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN tP (,,r " 3b
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Farms 27- 30
E
1VE� � �NRSort+°
3aoo REcE otPci�o
AGE"�pr p` 0 9 Zp09
nAnc
>180 days
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste orr_.y
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. --< -
1of8 �- ��

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, W, tons, etc.): 'Based on Site Specific
Capacity Type Waste Produced peE Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gallyr
gallyr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
gallyr
3000
Farrow to Finish
8021.125 gallyr
24,063,375 gallyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gallyr
10496
Feeder to Finish
986 gallyr
10,349,056 gal
Total 34,412,431 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
3000
Farrow to Finish
11.39 Ibslyr
34,170 Ibslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
10496
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibslyr
24,141 Ibslyr
Total 58,311 Ibslyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 305.61
Total N Required 1st Year: 97594.84
Total N Required 2nd Year: 97817.35
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 97,706.10
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 58,310.80
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (39,395.30)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2 of 8

Reception Area Specifications
Tract Field Irrigated Soil ist Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crap Lbs NJAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield lbs. NiUnit Residual lAc Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NIAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Code Apply Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual JAc Utilized
Total
Lbs NIAc
Total Ibs N
Utilized
1023
A
5.2
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
1690
L
Se-AprSeg-Apr
1
50
50
260
375
1950
B
7.2
Norfolk
C
Mar -Se t
6.5
50
325
2340
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
360
375
2700
C
5.3
Caroline
C
Mar -Sept
6.0
50
300
1590
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
265
350
1855
D
8.3
Caroline
C
Mar
6.0
50
300
2490
L
Se
1
5o
50
415
350
2905
E
8.2
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
2665
L
1
50
50
410
375
3075
F
4
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
1300
L
1
5o
50
200
375
1500
G
6.9
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6-5
50
325
2242.5
1 L
1
50
50
345
375
2587.5
H
7.4
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
2405
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
1
5o
50
370
375
2775
1
25.4
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
8255
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
1270
375
1 9525
J
16.1
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
5232.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
805
375
1 6037.5
K
4.6
Norfolk
C
MarSe
6.5
50
325
1495
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
1
50
50
230
375
1725
L
4.6
Norfolk
C
Mar
6.5
50
325
1495
L
1
50
50
230
375
1725
M
24
Norfolk
C
Mar- t
6.5
50
325
7800
LMSept-Apr
1
5o
50
1200
375
9000
N
14.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
4842.5
L1
50
50
745
375
5587.5
O
4.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept t
6.5
50
325
1592.5
L1
50
50
245
375
1837.5
P
4.7
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
1527.5
L
1
50
50
235
375
1762.5
Q
4.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Se
6.5
50
325
1592.5
L
1
5o
50
245
375
1837.5
R
2.8
Norfolk
C
MarSe
6.5
50
325
910
L
1
50
50
140
375
1050
S
2.4
Norfolk
C
MarSe t
6.5
50
325
780
L
1
5o
50
120
375
900
subl
11.23
Norfolk
D
Mar. -Jul.
115.0
1-25
143.75
1614.313
N
60
2.4
144
1617,12
287.75
3231.433
sub2
6.9
Norfolk
D
Mar. -Jul.
115.0
1.25
143.75
991.875
N
60
2.4
144
993.6
287.75
1985.475
sub3
9.3
Blanton
D
Mar. -Jul.
60.0
1.25
75
697.5
N
35
2.4
84
781.2
159
1478.7
sub4
11.1
NorlBla
D
Mar. -Jul.
60.0
1.25
75
832.5
N
35
2.4
84
932.4
159
1764.9
sub5
11
Blanton
D
Mar. -Jul.
60.0
1.25
75
825
N
Sept -Apr
35
2.4
84
924
159
1749
1023
subA&B
4.3
Norfolk
C
Mar -Se
6.1
50
305
1311.5
L
Se
1
50
50
215
355
1526.5
subC&D
8.1
Caroline
C
Mar -Sept
&0
50
300
2430
L
r
1
50
50
405
350
2835
subE
1.9
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
617.5
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
1
50
50
95
375
712.5
subF&G
1.9
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
617,5
L
Soot - Soot -Aix
1 1
50
50
95
375
712.5
subH
1.5
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
487.5
L
1
50
50
75
375
562.5
subl&J
9.9
Norfolk
C
MarSe
6.1
50
305
3019.5
L
1
50
50
495
355
3514.5
subK-Q
16.6
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.1
50
305
5063
L
1
50
50
830
355
5893
subR&S
4.6
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sep!
6.1
50
305
1403
L
Se -
1
50
50
230
355
1633
T
2.44
Blanton
D
Mar.,Jul.
60.0
1.25
75
183
N
Se
35
2.4
84
204.96
159
387496
U
1.94
Blanton
D
Mar.tidud.
60.0
1.25
75
145.5
N
Se -
35
2.4
84
162.96
159
308.46
V
2.89
Blanton
D
Mar.,fud.
60.0
1.25
75
216.75
N
Se
35
2.4
84
242.76
159
459-51
W
2.63
Blanton
D
Mar.,Jul.
60.0
125
75
i97.25
N
35
2.4
84
220.92
159
418.17
X
4.9
Blanton
D
Mar.,Jul.
60.0
1.25
75
367.5
N
Se
35
2.4
1 84
411.6
159
779.1
Y
4.7
Blanton
D
Mar.,Jul.
60.0
1.25
75
352.5
N
Sept -Apr
35
2.4
84
394.8
159
747.3
Z
4.7
Blanton
D
Mar. -Jul.
60.0
1.25
75
352.5
N
Sept -Apr
35
2.4
84
394.8
159
747.3
AA
2.41
Blanton
D
Mar.-JUL
60.0
1.25
75
180.75
N
Sept -Apr
35
2.4
84
202.44
159
1 383.19
BB
2.72
Norfolk
D
Mar..JuL
115.0
1.25
143.75
391
N
r
60
2.4
144
391.68
287.75
1 782.68
CC
4.9
Norfolk
D
Mar..JuL
115.0
1.25
1 143.75
704.375
N
Sept-AprSept-Apr
60
2.4
144
705.6
287.75
1409.975
DD
2.38
Norfolk
D
Mar..luL
115.0
1.25
143.75
342.125
N
60
2.4
144
342.72
287.75
684.845
EE
3.75
Norfolk
D
Mar. -Jul.
115.0
1.25
143.75
539.06251
N
I SePj'hPr
1 60
2-4
144
540
287.75
1079.063
FF
2.45
Norfolk
D
Mar. -Jul.
115.0
1.25
143.75
352.1875
N
I Se - r
60
2.4
144
352.8
287.75
704.9875
GG
2.67
Norfolk
D
Mar: Jul.
115.0
1.25
143.75
383.8125
N
Se - r
60
2.4
144
384.48
287.75
768.2925
Totals: 305.61 76864 20730.94 97594.94
3(a) of 8

Reception Area Specifications
Tract Field Irrigated Soil 1st Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total Ibs N
Acreage Type Code Apply Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual fAc Utilized
2nd Crap Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs NlAc Lbs N Total tbs N
Code Apply Yield lbs N1Unit Residual /Ac Utilized
Total
Lbs N1Ac
Total Ibs N
Utilized
1023
A
5.2
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
1690
L
Sept -Apt
1
50
50
260
375
1950
B
7.2
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
2340
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
360
375
2700
C
5.3
Caroline
C
Mar -Sept
6.0
50
300
1590
L
t- r
1
50
50
265
350
1855
D
8.3
Caroline
C
Mar -Sept
6.0
50
300
2490
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
415
350
2905
E
8.2
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
2665
L
Seet
1
50
50
410
375
1 3075
F
4
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
1300
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
200
375
1500
G
6.9
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
2242.5
L
Seo-AE
1
50
f
50
1 345
375
2587.5
H
7.4
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
2405
L
1
50
50
370
375
2775
1
25.4
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
8255
L
1
50
50
1270
375
9525
J
16.1
Goldsboro
C
Mar
6.5
50
325
5232.5
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
1
50
50
805
375
6037.5
K
4.6
Norfolk
C
Mar
6.5
50
325
1495
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
1
50
50
230
375
1725
L
4.6
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
1495
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
1
50
50N235
375
1725
M
24
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
7800
L
Se t-
1
50
50
375
9000
N
14.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
4842.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
375
5587.5
O
4.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Se
6.5
50
325
1592.5
L
Se t-
1
50
50
375
1837.5
P
4.7
Norfolk
C
Mar- t
6.5
50
325
1527.5
L
Se t-
1
50
50
375
1762.5
O
4.9
Norfolk
C
Mar
6.5
50
325
1592.5
L
r
1
50
50
375
1837.5
R
2.8
Norfolk
C
Mar Set
6.5
50
325
910
L
Se t-
1
50
50
375
1050
S
2.4
Norfolk
C
Mar
6.5
s0
325
780
L
1
50
50
120 1
375
900
subl
11.23
Norfolk
O
Jun -Set
42.0
4
168
1885.64
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
2
50
15
85
954.55 1
253
2841.19
sub2
6.9
Norfolk
O
Jun -Sept
1 42.0
4
168
1159.2
1 L
Sept -Apr
1 2
50
15
85
586.5
253
1745.7
sub3
9.3
Blanton
O
Jun -Sept
25.0
4
100
930
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
2
50
15
85
790.5
185
1720.5
sub4
11.1
NorBla
O
Jun -Set
25.0
4
100
1110
L
Sept -Apr
2
50
15
85
943.5
185
2053.5
subs
11
Blanton
O
Jun -Sept
25.0
4
100
1100
L
Sept -Apr
2
50
15
85
935
185
2035
1023
subA&5
4.3
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.1
s0
305
1311.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
215
355
1526.5
subC&D
8.1
Caroline
C
Mar -Sept
6.0
50
300
2430
L
Se - r
1
50
50
405
350
2835
subE
1.9
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
617.5
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
1
50
50
95
375
1 712.5
subF&G
1.9
Goldsboro
C
Mar
6.5
50
325
617.5
L
Sept-ADr
1
1 50
50
95
375
712.5
subH
1,5
Goldsboro
C
I Mar -Set
6.5
1 50
325
487.5
L
1
50
50
75
375
562.5
subl&J
9.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.1
1 50
305
3019.5
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
1
50
50
495
355
3514.5
subK-t
16.6
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.1
50
305
5063
L
1
50
50
830
355
5893
subR&S
4.6
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.1
50
305
1403
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
1
50
50
230
355
1633
T
2.44
Blanton
O
Jun -Sept
25.0
4
100
244
L
Se
2
50
15
85
207.4
185
451.4
U
1 1,94
Blanton
O
Jun -Sept
25.0
4
100
194
L
Sept -Apr
2
50
15
85
1 164.9
185
358.9
V
2.89
Blanton
O
Jun -Set
25.0
4
100
289
L
Sept-ADr
2
50
15
8s
245.65
185
534.65
w
2.63
Blanton
O
Jun -Sept
25.0
4
100
263
L
Sept -Apr
1 2
50
15
85
223.55
185
486.55
X
4.9
Blanton 1
O
Jun -Sept
25.0
4
100
490
L
2
50
15
85
416.5
185
906.5
Y
4.7
Blanton
O
Jun -Sept
25.0
4
100
470
L
Se
2
50
15
85
399.5
185
869.5
Z
4.7
Blanton
O
Jun -Sept
25.0
4
100
470
L
2
50
15
85
399.5
185
869.5
AA
2.41
Blanton
O
Jun -Sept
25.0
4
100
241
L
2
50
15
85
204.85
185
445.85
BB
2,72
Norfolk
O
Jun -Sept
42.0
4
168
456.96
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
2
s0
15
85
231.2
1 253
688.16
CC
4.9
Norfolk
O
Jun -Sept
4Y.0
4
168 1
823.2
L
Se
2
50
15
85
416.5
253
12391
DID
2.38
Norfolk
O
Jun -Sept
42.0
4
168
399.84
L
Sept-AprSept-Apr
2
1 50
15
85
202.3
253
602.14
EE
3.75
1 Norfolk
O
1 Jun -Set
42.0
4
168
630
L
I Se -
2
50
15
85
318.75
253
948.75
FF
2.45
Norfolk
O
JunSe E
42.0
4
166
411.6
L
Se -
2
50
15
85
208.25
253
619.85
GG
2.67
Norfolk
O
JunSe t
42.0
4
168
448,56
L
2
50
15
85
226.95
253
675.51
Totals: 305.61 79211.5 18605.85 97817.35
3(b) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 Ibs N / bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 Ibs N / ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 Ibs N 1 ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 Ibs N / bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 Ibs N / ton
F
Cotton
0.12 Ibs N 1 Ibs lint
G
Fescue - Grazed
50 Ibs N 1 ton
H
Fescue - Hay
50 Ibs N 1 ton
I
Oats
1.3 Ibs N / bushel
J
Rye
2.4 Ibs N 1 bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 Ibs N I acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 Ibs N 1 acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 Ibs N 1 cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 Ibs N 1 bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N / bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 Ibs N 1 acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables,
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4 of 8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications
PANT rlanimal Farm Totall r
Farrow to Wean
0.84
Farrow to Feeder
1
3000 Farrow to Finish
4.1 12300
Wean to Feeder
0.072
10496 Feeder to Finish
0.36 3778.56
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 16078.56 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 80392.8 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 267 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 643.1424 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
*This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract Hydrant
Type
Crop
inlhr
* inches
1023 A
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
B
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
C
Caroline
C
0.4
1
D
Caroline
C
0.4
1
E
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
F
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
G
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
H
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
1
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
J
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
K
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
L
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
M
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
N
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
O
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
P
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
Q
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
R
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
S
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
subl
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
sub2
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
sub3
Blanton
D
0.35
1
sub4
NorlBla
D
0.5
1
subs
Blanton
D
0.35
1
1023 subA&B
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
subC&D
Caroline
C
0.4
1
subE
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
subF&G
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
subH
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
subl&J
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
subK-Q
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
subR&S
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
T
Blanton
D
0.35
1
U
Blanton
D
0.35
1
V
Blanton
D
0.35
1
W
Blanton
D
0.35
1
X
Blanton
D
0.35
1
Y
Blanton
D
0.35
1
Z
Blanton
D
0.35
1
AA
Blanton
D
0.35
1
BB
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
CC
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
DID
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
EE
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
FF
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
GG
Norfolk
D
0.5
1
6 of 8

Additional Comments:
Sub field acreage is the balance of the total field acreage minus wet acres.
This acreage is claimed when makino application with an aerway machine.
All subfield acreage is optional for the plan.
This plan adds reel pulls as identified as pulls T-GG.
7 of 8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: Farms 27- 30
Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
Ilwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. llwe know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murp
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Date
Date
Name of Technical Specialist:
Amy E. Roberson
Affiliation:
Murphy -Brown, LLC.
Address:
2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer $56
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone:
[phone]
Signature:
Date
8 of 8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
7 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recieving crop type, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
8 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3 of 3

. ,.I�. , - ,., . , ,:' ; � . , , 1�, �,��,i�_,'_��." W , ��`�,Z*'e <, ,
. —. ._. I I , 1j.,. �1: . .I�.,. - e.,�, .. . , , —�..,�.," ",.,.,, ",, " ,'" , " , - ..I ,1.1 . . - I . -- ­. 7-1 =� -
?.,
, t ' 1 ,, , }
L
Ii0)
,, _ !.}' ti �,:�+.4 ....s: �.{.,,..-.t'^'r" a•_•f" {I 'i - r r 4 i.., ^t+ - „ `J _ _
.11
* '. Yam.•.•-•'•' r:, t' . �'' ".- IcMt'`�'.._ + . :Y`, h �i' S', i r r-
1. I JJ •fi-
'»r'w •,, ,Irw1-,'ie, !�'C�,{,Kz' •' •,y rw � `�.'� - ., • . ,. Q ',1, y �- ��,.,} 4+-�p;� .. �-j".& + r r 1 ! . 'I -
>mI r 1 'r,� + S, i, , I. f3 �w ak � tE-•1• .rti+ „ ,. S� f "1 r� i - r• _
r r qyi; �.' .� .'`.Fj , .!1yiti, :? !^ f 's.. 9: 1 t.i." ''0 r:4 'i' s� Ia 'b`rfi*� r4✓ �s t p `}++r. -f'.1 S� "�I t` >+ i . �i
„, �f� r e `�. ? + � rt tI :g !rr 1. .+ •'1».,
.. - ;r_ +• ur, � d' + '.. r f l�y°'yI �T$4t r 4° 'r "a 1° jk
`�' Ii�r' «� C t ,t.L LY - i,,;0 . , r' ( rs ' �f
, 1 • t`J * Its' pal, v� x,.:, 1'iM � J •it.1 r'r � �Iyd' y i.s Ts�}y 1 r '1 f I - I,, 5 r" �*!n � i� r i '`
1 �:„ i. T' S !r K, r, r ir7. #,11 l% v jt ry'r. • -
'� ' �f ? t.f t., Ir"' r t t� r s' 'r ,,a1 �,I fcJT r n'7.;t�'''; _ 7 {
r 1 -'' ;' I ,F ,i,r <, ;. •� f.:L>4r rL'e - d" ,Y } C r :Cy" r , - i ;y1 P r rK K" t, wr +rj. ti ,.
r :' L �, > Y" .!- Y, 1)'.. Ye k 1 ,-e stir , S" r r _ . .U.. •'6 - b i, e � v .&b w 1, i; ." . ,;,1. it „ r `i ' "
.l' , , ? of rti a i' : 4y i M �i: - '+< i r 1 a�rV iF �.Jm '�;-d. ' } 4 { ).i' :r y r s-,�^''" F
w-'� a `i`- - • rr 'b°` sue'_ 'IC��' • 3 "rS U, y'.. ,t r ,°' yFt'«Ik3• r.:',ty• rF'�•�£'��'r 3!' +r,+ �,11
4'4"'. 4`+ " - '•y•�.r ir. �. r _
�� S5M „ ,j:.is * - n x r4,i , y 4A r.r,' ia. r.r' ,..r I ' ,
n ",r , �` � _. .✓,. r1 r , v « i. a ?°5 r } �� , S a ,r s, » -1 r ?' I rt s . � n _
r L .n f,' P . ,. 7, ,{ ; " 1, + - , 'i. r }' - 3' .' et•"' "•"
.�-• , r F, �,1 �+#r � ,t'� �1r �, r 1 rr 1r "�i-t• � •J'w 24r V a �• ar r 4, "J » r1' .+. rep t '
r - f,+��� t i ] r_` .' , , f;C .!•s r"�'I: y��`+y" }��`S, +' e 1- 't- +�
" T < v' - h S n ;J i 1, V - ' �.� ,
j, +„ I _l'� �. 'P.,
44 � q` b ?r , ,m y • � j" _ t ' 1 +lz, Y SY - aiL f;, �, b' arr ' w.. � ,
R ,,,{ II r �Le I � {.l' s r:� ;,r'� yr .' I` / �»�!yl� i11 e4�,i).�" y ''* r,
'.s kiti .1 ,1''�' J 1G"4 FF '$'!. �Ad Py '.' %^ ,� F �i ` t N ex i w ' T r ti : t ;•�I' t V r5 i. fia' , .ti .'y �$' ` _.i s ll � tyt e �.�, ... "d;»-
"t - ?L ')" . S • - 3' �. i + F '� r 1 7, '�i .+ ,� 1 i '1 ,.y I k [ .,' h K+ L Mt �Wr-r. ..1 , - �r
3, , ii-- m� �1£ .. a 'ai �-� t Fo3._ x ' �mr fl,' „y �y l ` �' �' .. ' t<jw •a .ti t ,� �r < 94 t •- , '?. ` .,
,�;' 5 it.41
wf, 4,• v , r`�-, �. r� );,, y, �v� �'fp�ta,�4 l5 OS x Sri'' '4' zA` ..d i r �. :- y r,,,�l ti �. F c ,..", r- y r _ , ti J. '
Y. - r', 'la J I £.�S I� , ,, 'f w.r'� a"�, ..�, 4..';,i f.+;'r�'���+ � r� .'� �li �e�� : !i�ir d� ,r %k.; �5_. ��r.y w J -'', rM : 1 � _
7 ..'.5 r �r 5 ,. 1:j € I. r r r , 4.
, i r s " ". - - " S yr. - 1 ' S ` . 41
r�% y`'r}r- ', ' � l'" -•m., �{ i } ,hri fk 1 , -a :.F '. + r •-
., r 4 f,� �., Vi
s ,," rt, Y 1 q', I. ,� ��d'" •":r /- ry.•1 ws J `l 1' .v r s• �[. ",1 J � _q , r y !"f l i' �YS 9' " r 11. `,' '� w t ' Y d, ' 1 , `a . ' r a
r ;F' .F _ y7£ tw- .,r + T.,;__�-1-""Fr C `yid -I � .J ,-'4""">_rr^•
`., �1 3 I • y n ` .L {r' T ,�4 . , i;fir r .L ' m. �. - i$. I - �, .
' �,,i-�[ r' ,f�l! �r • ^ j, L" , 1} '1 • °` r '� ', fu � 1 ,, . N ' +�f „t k r, r , N,,-3, , r I r �? ;'l ?�' y r, - - "
r .4E11 � a h ^ � t1 a ,rJFr.r � f< y +, 5 � 4 i �� _f.
I '' ' k i rlf» �S , s i f w -�. �5 wy, r�",:'n..r. . i r y e t� i •F>� bi '� i r S }: y J ,
+ r 3 ; y. ,l alrC A sic ,' ` r` 3 � �� :.� j Y ` iXt sc r 1 �,
. • < , I' - 'i . ',J G k. 3 f: T r. f C •R , L' r ' "r` ar ; . , S 1"• +, { }',, I
1 ::', + I 4,. id 1r £: �i k.:J r, _it.A �r k E r'' + '{' 'k ir:.:,.. i , 1 1' -t' i. y ¢ -•_%
Y rl ,� wsr t ti ', i l`r Ap ,t , •rr-d�f,l'•' y - - { °°'+,1 j �. �qs' rk; fs r`` "^ .(,�'`•r _ J`9 °r
. I + yv, '� s> r t r' }'{ *_'� yr'* s it J•F _ �•hryv$' ' . • tt.•- 'r '. , + t_ 4 �. Y -
+ , ,c ,, 3 ' J. r 14 �,;{ �" i7v a' ' - ` {!k• k , F _s i '� . 'i. (} y.% ..: 1 l y. n ti:. ti .i,�'1 a 4 ..'kf - 5''t�""">`i, .v a i41r :'kii. t, r sI. , . 4 4 , - `H x "7 ¢w 'i
+ . r r t ! _,. F Sd .y'•_ r.y' ` ?% G 1 ;,`''� ' ,,F *! .. f }; - .y4 � •.4 r r �r I '� • Y _�' �i '�x; gz'_
_ JG.'S 3 J I,r,-.y Y ','f ° ) 1 S 1'Yt .;3r^ JY,�i...•.L +:t •l 7 ' • «+. • : r
�1 SY !� .",- ,, v , I s Ig' k q �.I } x 1 �:c}a" , y c> J"S I !� ;ik '!'4'�;
? r, , g+ h s'.�`I;qt ^' r., °»'k-i l., t< J !'. Jw ' ,? jt' - �,". , 4z' .x - S • .r i , r ,t• ',a , !I •',
fir• •, i"'.. Mga_. i yy ` [1~, }--gJ r Fi, ., ,,,w ".` ;�� l w.y , _jz ♦�' 1 �. -
r 1'"I: I ,..r Y ,+ !"+'1 f7 lr� '+` ,i. ,. ,� u' !'f.... ,...'�5`�. Y' ' .,• �' 1 l
:. v n ,. '1 ..t,';�i'•• �• zl:.r ti ,��^ ty;f fi : ',c.. k l I fr•,., �"•
�:d a j L °1'�r� n+ . ., t w, r�dJ tiT� fS l.i .N J „ ''� u i ss� 3
+� , I �t r.'e 'r k,y.,+. 'Al 14-F -"'r' :I + ; -�'• N,�, �u__ Sl i .. :'+'+' •y "ih i �.. •�y.is err. • '�" i _
•�*''°r 'A. �u° -.� �' 1.,':t _ S.H�,_`' ±'r''£'r fat 9t, ( t+ 'Iti� i'y'.1 {, e^� is ,nyi lY.f-id* =iv'h X-:1.51yV,, �� i S
1.I
v + }} ' {•� , # ' �y . u, t rt ?, il_ ,_t � " +,. {. r -t' • a - 7 �' u J. .J , r- . "ti
A r+ 4 .. iy ' I A 1 , 4 _ ,F # ..FAI. 4'1r1h�K LL' . i;'1"dl,..• A, a•.ra..-.:..•' -� . •t' ���T .. _
.� 5 , :. rf„1.� a �„iN A .»F'� � "^. ii" +, 's ,, J k , , r "� `" ,,-'r, `� ih� yic k. 1,'Fx•h TMw r, . " f''�
r7% 1 b i [ a: r .Ft1 4
J P I. t_'� I I . ,G, t r r "r -. •T. ,,'Y-�.4,t ,..t �1 . , ,., � • � .. [rjj ,
J V/ ,>,ii J J{ } y ,, r -,. �yt -i`s srr rL.
z�,� �' A lt� R ' ''gg� G . y F �" r..4.;,'r Y" Rk* ,`' s !1 S ." ' - r ,a'a r t . -
t' ',Yi 5Y ,,.3"� �' J I.. ,r`i"��} }' w k,. t `Y:`y', ^ , _ . ar '` "±,� 1 '.,kt'A ,, F
r ,.i ,i r // V " "r e., S ,F �'. 'rff J"'Y �,A s n r r T� 'M'-` r � . :' ,.+ _
f ' ;} ^u t '� M14 y ,f',r,rY' •>i w� 1� w' .{. p° .r + ,
.,,
;• +j w. s sv.- ` . Y .'-t fs! ,, . �} r _ .r l r_r l.,,ey . , ■ t'i�r Sy -5 r
,, • .B F-•• r•�, •'. ., . r n r. `F i ,... �v3'+.� � 1 /i 'r S , l �' 3 }I (I r ,+
)'" 4 " z�Y 6 �' � i ' 1' ., ' V X,�q, .3^fr'i! d - tk ' j ,4 + r t'� "r56 . ., �"_�. '� y.� w- r.r, ! + ;a a r - s '} '•r' ,
-, y.;_„ - ., ;- •• A"!f �1 �''.;" r ",w ,5+ 9 - --}�jp�'�14 �4r•-� ,, <� It'tr' . e �P'- s': -J „nr w•'r.,,k I .1. •.."i`c�-,^`✓"•;r'_ w::.i_
F;, h +;'£,; - .. S , J�I t•' j '[t, 4r ,. h,j ;i r�,' Y,f. ,; S:', ' a ls}'r"td�'''s{1' Isx..�,1 r r ; �^r,.>.` rp k Ca''S'!", .r.rnpr • - y t' ,y r - ''" m ` e
J fR,'�." J�Ifa: ii k',; i i, �ruw+# N p .a r+, . M, ;•3 ix,�, a* , J H r ..
- Y ' ' , r ` ,a fi""'� .:,_� AID ' ny fih r';a ,Y' . �� s � S� " `+d7 r, •' �r Ft ii . { j � - ,,. • � r� r,
- r. �, �1 cgi 3¢ Y JIy '3-,, y ". _ +� J f4 ] ., 4 1 Itt } i �;. }, ,r .
i f,
t}* rr.; i„r•, } e <" - R+.,. - 'k r sr y'° E. Z, , •; .lr F" 'it,' } ti i .�l } a !§her '.car r -�• r J' ± •5„
£,�'r'a, . 4 r t l , st - 1 1' ¢¢ , s <»; +5`; � *ram^+"'. _yS` .
�Ci r[' - r3�. 1}" is 4";� f itY{pl'� yt r
f 1 - .i 1 J l
+•! ,zl a 'i 11. C',�� }- ,r;.w i r csri �7L3 F-`� ++ 4 5'} i+�'� __. ,
y , _.s a ��'' ! a, car" ra r >
�'"x.�v:`,> k.. +, _' ,{ 1C t'».nr+ 4 - }� ,. r •'" �;+i k�,l .ct '", ,.Se"[ s; r.-.��..L"'�, ._ » .
,y �'. ._,, 1 -. i. ,,,y , J_'' s 411', G . r.. 5 • .i � � ft 4.., .u,; ' * 4Z ' �k .� r ' 1 J",, f,„t rt.'. i H I,.j ; - '`r
,1 'I �fi -r ? I r, ' S.,i. y '�.. r- S J, Y,��ti ,,. ; ly�(.�,,{�,.<��4c.Y,p' ".j4 �1 ,: ,
, • i' r h .. ' j t F- i' 11 • . , �� -rF f I a t t. f 'D , i t` _q, ii ; fff••• .:,
d r - , w' {� 9, f - . f to ,M r r; - �r �r% to `r 9 y d r �. F.E, 1`��''� I O4 ..
'SAC=r r r M f �. q, t rM ` r r 4.r . ` �r�"+CJ e•!., L _�, " ,j j r ! + _ ,
(Y > ,d I L �'f r y r'. t r° f ',1,,.y� r +..,/ . , r r fr '_t .fir .Y 4 { $ l � }�ri? i E3 �l� A,.'� r Fi aj, r A '�'
. _. 'a .r..r`- ^I: E, r• r+ •Y1..11 o. �s�s Fr . L r ' _ -
• '�f?s t '' v s ,I t -.,@,$i�
r ;s r '! r}b» r , a tiwti<�"'. t) .:ti ur I -- t
` r t'. t '' �a 1 k ya s. r' °' ,,gy y {fI i a rL V,J .,,x: S � ^^�__r' A.,r.� .. �, 4w ' pr �' •i.: F a �,,.,' P'+ f - _ .F ur `I�, r•?I'"°1 rho" r ,it Yam+ " d=
1.1
�. f I rr. 9 F^ }ia J c 2 q, *.° 1 a •' { Y.• ti i, r f r;�
k^',1 7 }J I I
' D ry=`tiCrF r �3 :.r% A� J.' T- W r +: d I', '.ra, • .! Y. o . e 'u• $ 4 1 J I °
„ �, t,. F 7"_r`..`>t '+ t8 Y. J ; Y it .lix3 . Yc ' , a ti , {r - y.i"+V• -Y " r
4
'j i . 1 . ai' S/M ! t L"�•,.L w ] F r .. . , t ..� c- 6—
ky. H , U..t 4a 2 5. i(']i?''� «Tr , Tr a 5.3' l_ x ^'�"% F !!! [�..< ',, ,t _ �" 4•., 'S'1:+.
t � F . 4 f'd �. I �'' $r S"'4"'1,. � 'tI ,,i � `j, ?�,,.�5'^ 4 rr 'S as �r' y +- r i'! .,....,t. i« •:n .
=it- 1;1.� !, 1., ., ''e, I' f ;, a-' J .4;} 1� r.5 i I 1' Y ,' t 7 f +r I
z� 4�'1, I
r ,!
s + ,.f 5 , L, f
.' I . �`.. ' ,7 'p**°" — - i "* V ur"' 1 )uu s3s u . l r:. yrt-, . t ,'��..Yx ._ +s l + ' ,i. ,.. I -
r.�, tt
_� I 4a-i .�y rk'� , Y " • _ kYs . o-r`. r r - a . , ..-I 7,, '
r f , , an -..;i rri 3+a l ,y£?' ':. a. { , °y°•' i-l", ih iTv„ `q `, , ,.. I ,
4� s i $} r }FrFr; 3 1 . ' �, ' l�r M$ =h ti ` �rl `� � j y ! , r';r .
. " I k ;' " " t: ,r r TCr,n6 1. x , 1. y . g Y.
�; r F ! $ <' ` ?
.. ,".r4r 'R6'Y$:4 iy . w]� €i #� r 4 rai f ��., t
tYilr' -v,.•++n;�y.. {yam +yr .R {: R, 5• i:' fr7r` .µy S e r _5 £�, {r I' j, ' �� ty� ,
r-.aur-t' S" rl" <' x. 1 .3 1� �r, r! } �Jr!�,,,Y::--^i'w� "� y+.,5 - .d - .. i .. y ,1 ;µ^:»i.r"� !'aW. {. ,4 "..f,.i r" Z��R% ,IL;rar4P. ,'fat !0.� - "f.':..a pl;�, f; i* ,,4�., �t , 1, £ ,£I�^.s ` r •` r, ' f ' • r' i f tir'•r "' ---
rmow. .s. , -1 �""'a.i', r v by-''-.? <- ,rry i! f 'I•:^,!d' �` ".4'Ier,l} y.' .bFAv..i-�,ti. �1., y�r p -t xi" i-,..1� r
1. r. .,de pp t •^1.._., - .,? ,,,.. ! --_ N . - .jar + .��' ? FC. ," . `r b . } ' 5•Yq.i ?A..I 4 'F. ~`''a :r
' �, ' 'r ,�,, �f. 4 y I . ��' ,'r<, �A .,i, '.. , r �'h.+r ,r' ! „ 1s 1 ^µ'' I_ _ ^ + .:' 4 T" 1 .y5 1 i. - r ,-^�}rU° 4
r �a
m.
it v
r;, st-_ , .' r, `�:r t- j .j. -.'F !"t. A, �P4,. it,. I 4',,, a,4. .9!ly Y ,r.,..r .� <.. 'y+y;�y :'W y 1 �_: �r :r `yr p'�;3* tI d'..ek,ii' y y�'ir �r t,l.. '.,_ {„`1k, '�'-`;.< :sJ. ."
nY i` y a n •t, + L' "j ~? 1 i k a f as" `TA �, i�, k � i` '
.:�,r` . '1,r :. - - b'," t' i S. f J ,, gyp, Y 4� ; i _t tc 5 { r "} i r - ,� - }� 1 - `.�'%_
• j�~`.; , a J r i .e k 1 . ,�`, '117! >• Y� i c' 1''k M �y r1. `, -*i F,, .v +1.vy � ' ,iy+ G i`k rr a v�i:•, t. �?` r• : _ , r, :. „� ,y r ,
r . k� f M d,,,' •'* y }.Sv ��/ '4 r` L \{ "( C'• _ rt � L' \ ,f ar C fi
• t - 5 i.r A� S �,,�r� •'`art e 4` 1R+ Rr p E, ;t* t p1 ti y ,y.l L - „( t "s
tr?A +. 1 �, ' 1 e. f Y/', d+ .x otz :r, FR''� ,"' 7` ,k"; 5 4 ,rn 5 1, sat i1,,L s.. I +++......,,, frr - I �' �}�
r� , { ' } r �J!'»;u tY _ 1''r�I A � r: `T '' 4�` �q��.,15 if N . •' 'L _ j li
s > ` _ z a y k ♦ J; h •e , .i rr'd+a �� tay� {,-tr�{ � i .q 1 Q• l r r 1 y i "� i -► }
+. Yost . , I �v 1.r k' �` F, , �r f �N k,,Ir i 4P4 �7f�"Gn /tss+ s� K£{� {+�r��k yt,.' N �J "� t 3r v,, .. y3:f ,rtz `1 r' ,' :�, 3.: ,!
�, a f,V� rg'•'`T'1 •r $$p�• t � '" �, ... a.. y 1 - ; c . T'- fry r r ,-. �:. , s., nr} { J ) i,, �., a ,,' r;.
. �(: t.1' z ?� •' r,,,r' 4i i 4)i �':.w 'tf w .� 1. y*, k R ,+ k
I �� •' 4R 1L"!+'`. wr. ,, o �i" = Ff „e' f r� 7rrV'>�9 r �'y .t.Y t -4 -.'ir +', di''' 1 r '-r ' �,•
• , +ti 1 { 4 Z: - - f w ✓ k , a. l rsr x�a t - ^, < a - I.
r,. 4 1 .",fir l , . '+ . `. J'j 4" k i r 11 y tl. {,. -,.qr '� , '<�,,�� •Y�a1^s ra ,J ` k'� , . t.l r ,y't^r-• Y f r-_'•'.%'^• ....�.r-'..•"r'.•
i r IV Y yq+l k r 4 afi s , e, [ T x a F t *4e 4•�t . ' d `• Y' t s -
. ,, -i. , , v i s .l',,? .£ 4I - 41 �`"'�t." 1 [ 3 Wry .' } � �'�1-y, ' r . 'l,. ' - � .' ' i • .. l," .
, I.' , s , .1 A�¢T. A t." '� 1. Y 4 •. ,r _ n ,q �A 4. t�
_. rA`Ow 1IF ,'"' _.��f V` +,T,..+ y r t»r' I. 4. ri 7 t, l+f4. ..n r' +> ' 5, L , .F 1i* r( m c ,- f1 v ,£ �i
+ Y O^ r✓_f- -r-"' , I q N 1 r '� ram' a j, rti4, 1,' r s, r r v* •} I ti ! ai• F f I .. i,
'1 .,.'ly ! '' „' ' i �•r'U "! !rL? a',�r t' >!' & r.\"{,<,}� ri ' ^s-
Ea _ ^f'-. "_ ,nr +i ' '} ti - ,, < £ gp' 5 t^.0 a i •.:IN A"<i ' �wr+���✓�Mr h , . ..,;t`+ !,r a
'r r_ �+•a,t V . i1 rl y ! x�'� 4 - _ jar-t Y� }t ' .r
• 3 r `" , yl r }�+1 - ., V, ° ,'{+ r + [r `kO.J I 3 ,^� +.{p '
�'� C. rt y '" � jlt u, �1�" , ri+ -"b', .?' . . - J' f'� L"'.0 r �r4q't r'r� S P t. ki*.. � r,r+7'�9 IY' 1i .� �_
w
•1 ,i ;, �. - .. ' w.." . :'-, r y .d,: .'�+'1, 1 } 7••„f' y' . l;,, .. ,+rL.'^Y.w„'+n++.'.....�.."•.-- .... `"
[ rr. .+t - r111 r".. .''*ti".11,`S , 1. , <j_. scIf-r.x'' - , .

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
` FILE ACCESS RECORD
SECTION 'D(JL) R— l a RQ5 DATE/TIME `'119 e-
NAME L, c,inu _-Loss- _ REPRESENTING C e a& r
2.
3.
4:
5.
6.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public
records in our custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the
responsibility to the public to safeguard these records and to carry out our day -today program
obligations. Please read carefully the following before signing the form.
Due to the large public demand for file access, we request that you call at least a day, in
advance to schedule an appointment for file review so you can be accommodated.
Appointments are scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m on Tuesday Wednesday and
Thursday. Viewing time ends at 4:45 p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view
the files to the extent that time and staff supervision are available.
You must specify files you want to review by facility name or incident number, as appropriate.
The number of files that you may review at one appointment will be limited to five.
You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits.
Cost per copy is 5 cents for ALL copies, front and back will be 10 cents per copy. Payment is
to be made by check, money order, or cash in the administrative offices.
FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU RECEIVED THEM. Files may not be taken
from the office. . To
remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor for
Which you can be fined up to $500.00.
In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $25.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
The customer must present a photo ID, sign -in, and receive a visitor sticker prior to reviewing
files.
FACILITY NAME COUNTY
M
41
WAL..ka � RAH 1 1 i,4
Pignatu=rio and N me of Firm/Business batd Time In Time Out
Please attach a business card to this form if available

PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR LAGOON SLUDGE REDUCTION
Facility Number: 66-030 County: Northampton
Facility Name: 8528 P
Certified Operator Name:_ Murphy -Brown LLC _ Operator #:
Note: A certified Sludge Management Plan may be submitted in lieu of this POA.
La oon 1
Lagoon 2
Lagoon 3
5
La oon 6
8528 P
a. Lagoon Name/ Identifier
7oonLagoon
5.91
b. Total Sludge Depth (ft)
c. Sludge Depth to be
.21
Removed for Compliance
(ft)
d. Sludge Volume to be
2000000
Removed (gallons)
e. Sludge PAN
10
(lbs11000 gal)
f. Liquid PAN
2
(lbs11000 gal)
g. PAN of Sludge (Ibs)
20000
(d x e)11000
Compliance Timeframes:
if the sludge level is equal to or higher than the stop pump level of the lagoon or if the sludge level
results in an elevated waste analysis, a sludge management plan that meets the requirements of SB
Interagency Group Guidance Document 1.26 must be prepared by a technical specialist and submitted to
DWQ within 180 days. Work to reduce the sludge level must begin within another 180 days.
Compliance with NRCS Standard 359 must be achieved by the expiration date of the current permit.
If the sludge level is non -compliant but below the stop pump level of the lagoon, a POA must be filed
within 90 days and compliance with NRCS Standard 359 must be achieved within two years of the
original sludge survey indicating non-compliance. If future sludge surveys do not show improvement in
sludge levels, DWQ may require the owner to develop a sludge management plan that meets the
requirements of SB Interagency Group Guidance Document 1.26.
SPOA 3-22-2010 Page 1 of 2

NARRATIVE: Use this section to describe the method(s) that will be used to lower the sludge
depth. If microbe use is planned, specify the product to be used.
Mechanical Removal By Pump and Haul —Land has been identified In the vicinity of the lagoon
that will allow for the agitation and mixing of the sludge layer, and subsequent land application of
the material on these acres. A sludge management plan will be developed prior to initiating these
activities, and records will be kept of these applications as required by permit.
Or
Sludge will be mechanically removed by a dredged or lagoon agitator pump then mixed with
polymer and pumped Into geotextile tubes for dewatering of the solids. Solids will be harvested
from geotextile tubes after adequate drying and hauled to agricultural fields for agronomic
application.
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached
Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the Information is accurate and
correct. I further certify and acknowledge that compliance with regard to sludge accumulation
must be achieved within two years of the original sludge survey indicating non-compliance.
Sludge Survey Date: 2114118 Compliance Due Date: 2/14/20
Murphy -Brown LLC Phone; 910-293-3434
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
,IDA,.;JXrL4 /it Date: 2/20/18
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
Return this form to;
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
NC Division of Water Resources
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
SPOA 3-22-2010 Page 2 of 2

FLB- i C-03 i ION 06 : 03 Pi
Fp}, ;an, p n
Erom's of cairalo,ia, Virginia ❑M5i an
F'O Box 1240
431 E, Maill St.
W,werly, VA 23500
(3ff4) 834-2109
S34-3207 Foy;
1b. Buster Towell
From: Neil Zahradka
� ;xW; (9113) 57-1-4718 Pages: 9 (induding cover)
N'�iaroen (date; February 10, 2003
Re: Farm 30 POA CC.
Urgent ElFor Review LD Please Comment ❑ Please Reply � As Requested
u Comments:
The fokwing is a POA for Farms 27-30, namely lagoon 30 secondary. At this point, our POA will only
include land application, it levels rise past 1 T' and we have not been able to land apply, I will update
tiie POA with pump and haul information.

FEB-10-03 MOIL 06:04 PM
F
FAX N0, P. 02
1--IL ON OF AC"f10N(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Faci:. ty N lniber; 66-30
County: Northamp!on
f etC,ii:t iw;,me: Smithfield-CarrolYs Farm 27-30 (dba arown's of Carolina -VA Division)
Gertil �d Operator Name: Ferri McClintocX Operator Number: 27441
1. Cairrcnt liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowc-;t point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in Vie lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon Lagoon 5 Lagoon 6 Lagoon 7 Lagoon 8
Lag+ )n NamoflD: 27P 27S 28P 28S 29P 29S 30P 30S
Spitlway(Y or N): N N N N N N N N
25 19 19 21 22 19 22 16
2. Check all appticable items
Liquid }evel is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
dive and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Pian of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range,
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations, Volume and PAN content of waste
to be purnped and hauled is reflected in section III tables, Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
'"Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
"if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. P dl;c ,t possible date to begin land application of waste: 2/13103 (weather permitting)
I heiehy certify that I have reviewed the information fisted above and included within the
after -L f;od Plan of AAiction, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
acctaa,i+: and correct.
Neil Z,tahrndka Phone: [phone]
Facility Owner/Manager int)
11 Date: 2110103
acility wne anager (signature)

FEB-10-03 MON 06:04 PM
FAX N0, P. 03
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO 13E LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1, Structure Name/Identifier (lo): F 30S Ll
2, Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a, current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b, designed 25 yrJ24 hr, storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 1 878401 ft2
e, line 02 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 54754 gallons
3, Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural desion 180 days
g, volume of waste produced according to structural design 346039 ft3
h. current herd # F-70-0-01 certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 346039 ft''
certified herd #
i, volume of wash water according to structural design —O]ft3
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 304776 ft'
k. (lines h + i * j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f= 811349 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 1/30/ 33 1,90 Ibs11000 gal.
rn. ((lines e t k)/1000) x line I � 1646.6 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

FF8-10-03 LION 06:04 HI FAX NO. 0L
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section lit) = 1981,5 (b. PAN
y, Overall PAN balance (w � x) _ -336 lb. PAN
Line y�must snow as a deficit, If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
1�t,ul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc, For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate n8w PAN
oascd on new information if new fie{ds are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to Me PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. if animal waste is to be hauled to
ancthc,r permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
re civinri facility.
�Irr-i on or
�3vailca��4^ I'o
ro ,ti ('M Day) 2121100

FEB- i 0-03 MION 06:04 FN
r
FAX FiiO,
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.I24
hiC4. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1,
5tructure ID: 30S
line rn = 1645.6 lb PAN
2
Structure Ib;
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
fine rn
lb PAN
4,
Structure ID:
line rn =
ib PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
G.
Structure ID:
line rn =
!b PAN
n. lines 11.+ 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + S 1645,6 lb PAN
111, TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD,
o tict'a
p, field #
q. crop
r, acres
s. remaining IRR
Z PAN balance
(lblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCC FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r X s
v. appricahon window'
rye
4.00
50.00
200,0
rye
6.90
43.00
296.7
K
ae
4.60
38.00
174.8
L
rye
4.60
50.00
230.0
M
e
24.00
4500
1080.0
:7tate current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
rec;::iving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 1981 5 lb. PAN
IV, FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 1645.6 lb. PAN
FIDA (30 Day) 2/2.1100
\1

FEB-10-03 MON 06:04 PM FM N0, P. 00
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
i aC,l;ity Number: 56-30
County; Northampton
F�,cili y Name-, Smithfield-Carrcil's Farm 31 (dba Brown's of Carolina -VA Division)
Operator game: Terri McClintock Operator Number: 27441
1. Current liquid lctel(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowc--�t point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in tt3;; lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
t agoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5 Lagoon 6 Lagoon 7 Lagoon 8
t,agr,,l0i� Narme/1027P 27S 28P 28S 29P 29S 30P 30S
, ili.v {y(Y or N): N N N N N N N N
Lr;vr !{irrCiyes); 25 19 19 21 22 19 22 18
2, C%iiec� ail applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Rye and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
wilhin acceptable ranges.
X Liquid Icvel is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Wastc is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section Ill tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
`Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
*if animal:', are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. L'1a0e-,;t possUe date to begin land application of waste 2/13/03 (weather permitting)
I I'ia;c;by cortify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
aekachcd Flan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
acc.;.trate and correct.
Neil [ahradka
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
Phone: [phone]
Date: 2/10/03

.5
Farm; 29&30,freeboard/POA
Subject: Farms 29&30 freeboard/POA
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 12:36:29 -0500
From: Nei] Zahradka <[e-mail]>
To: Buster Towell <buster.towel [e-mail]>
Buster,
,Both Farms 29 and 30 had 17" of freeboard midday yesterday (2/3/03). We are
actively pumping to transfer water to other lagoons on this site to get back to
1911, and this can be considered our current POA. If we are not at 19" by
tomorrow, I will send you additional POA information.
Neil Zahradka
LNM Manager
Brown's of Carolina, Virginia Division
[phone]
1 of 1 2/6/03 8:14 AM

Farm 29 & 30 freeboard level - update
Subject: Farms 29 & 30 freeboard level - update
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 08:23:07 -0500
From: Neil Zahradka <[e-mail]>
To: Buster Towell <buster.towel [e-mail]>
Facility ID 66-30
Smithfield-Carroll's Farms 27-30
Farm 29 secondary lagoon has been pumped down to 20" total freeboard as of
2/5/03.
Farm 30 secondary lagoon is at 18" as of 2/5/03 - Transfer to other lagoons will
continue on 2/6/03. Expected to regain 19" of freeboard.by 2/7/03 through
transfer.
Neil Zahradka
LNM Manager
Brown's of Carolina, Virginia Division
i of 1 2/6/03 8:40 AM
i

Waste Management Plan Changes
Facility (�� r,,, - 3 o Farm of `'] f 3 O
This farms Waste Management Plan has made the following changes:
Crop changes
VN
❑ Wetted Acres
❑ increased Acreage
❑ Decreased Acreage
❑ Changed Irrigation Design
❑ Change in Farm type
❑ Plan based on 3 Years On Farm Records
❑ Other
Comments:
Date
JUN - 8 2011
INC nEv'
RateigF �,1 Or,

li,
Murphy -Brown, LLC 6/7/2011 2822 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 2830
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s):
Murphy -Brown, LLC
Farm Name:
Farms 27- 30
County:
Northam ton
Ii-t
Farm Capacity:
�! �
Farrow to Wean
,�I 111! - �Q��
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
3000
iVC DE:19
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
10496
Storage Structure:
Anaerobic Lagoon
Storage Period:
a180 days
Application Method:
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. -Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, fe, tons, etc.): "Based on Site Specific
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gaVyr
gal/yr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gal/yr
galtyr
3000
Farrow to Finish
8021.125 gal/yr
24,063,375 gal/yr
Wean to Feeder
223 gaVyr
gaVyr
10496
Feeder to Finish
986 gal/r
10,349,056 RaV r
Total 34,412,431 ga
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (Ibs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibs/yr
Ibs/yr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibs/yr
Ibslyr
3000
Farrow to Finish
11.39 Ibs/yr
34,170 Ibstyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibs/yr
lbs/yr
10496
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibs/ r
24,141 Ibs/yr
Total 58,311 lbstyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 305.61
Total N Required 1 st Year: 108815.25
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 108,815.25
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 58,310.80
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (50,504.45)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2of8

Reception Area Specifications
Tract Field Irrigated Soil fat Crop Time to 1st Crop 1st Crop 1..bs N1Ac Lbs N Total Iba N
Acres e T Code Yield Ibs NlUnit Residual lAc Utilized
2nd Crop Time to 2nd Crop 2nd Crop Lbs N1Ac Lbs N Total Ibs N
Code Yield Iba NAlnit Residual lAc Utilized
Total
Lbs N1Ac
Total tbs N
Utilized
1023
A
5.2
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
1690
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
260
375
1950
B
7.2
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
2340
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
360
375
2700
C
5.3
Caroline
C
Mar -Set
6.0
50
300
1590
L
Sept -Apr
1
5D
50
265
350
1855
D
8.3
Caroline
C
Mar -Se
6.0
50
300
2490
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
415
350
2905
E
8.2
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
2666
L
Se -Apr
1
50
50
410
375
3075
F
4
Goldsboro
C
Mar-§2pt
6.5
50
325
1300
L
Sept -Apr
t
50
1
50
200
375
1500
G
6.9
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Set
6.5 1
50
325
2242.5 1
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
345 1
375
2587.5
H
7.4
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
2405
L
Set r
1
50
50
370
375
2775
I
25A
Norfolk
C
Mar -§apt
6.5
50
325
8255
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
5D
1270
375
9625
J
16.1
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
5232.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
805
375
6037.5
K
4.6
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
1495
L
Sept-Apf
1
50
50
230
375
1725
L
4.6
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
1495
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
230
375
1725
M
24
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
7800
L
Sept -Apr 1
1
50
50
1200
375
9000
N
14.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
1 325
4842.5
L
Sept -Apr 1
1
50
50
745
375
5587.5
0
4.9
Norfolk
C I
Mar -Sept
6.5
1 50
1 325
1592.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
245 1
375
1837.5
P
4.7
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
SD
325
1527.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
235
375
1762.5
a
4.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
1592.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
245
375
1837.5
R
2.8
Norfolk
C
-Mar-Sept
6.5
50
325
910
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
140
375
1050
S
2.4
Wrialk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
780
L
Sept -APT
1
50
50
120
375
900
sub1
11.23
Norfolk
C
Mar -Se
6.5
50
325
3649.75
L
Sepl-Apr
1
50
50
561.5
375
4211.25
sub2
6.9
Norfolk
G
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
2242.5
L
I Sept -Apr
1
50
1 50
345
375
2507.5
sub3
9.3
Blanton
C
7 Mar -Set
4.5
50
225
2092.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
465
275
2557.5
sub4
11.1
NOdBIa
I C
Mar -Set
1 5.5
50
275
3052.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
555
325
3607.5
subs
11
Blanton
I C
Mar -Sept
1 4.5
50
225
2475
L
Sept±2r
1
50
50
550
275
3025
1023
subA&B
4.3
Norfolk
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
5o
325
1397.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
215
375
1612.5
subC&D
I 8.i
Caroline
C
Mar -Set
6.0
50
300
2430
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
405
350
2835
subE
1.9
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Sept
6.5
50
325
617.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
95
375
712.5
subF&G
1.9
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Set
6.5
so
325
617.5
L
r
1
50
50
95
375
712.5
subH
1.5
Goldsboro
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
1 325
487.5
1 L
Sew -Apr
1 1
50
50
75
375
562.5
subl&J
9.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
1 50
325
3217.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
495
375
3712.5
subK-Q
16.6
Norfolk
G
I Mar -Set
6.5
1 50
325
5395
L I
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
1 $30
375
1 6225
subR&S
4.6
Norfolk
C
I Mar -Set
6.5
1 50
325
1495
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
230
375
1 1725
T
2.44
Blanton
C
Mar -Set
4.5
50
225
549
L
Se i-A r
1
50
50
122
275
671
U
1.94
Blanton
C
Mar -Set
4.5
50
225
436.5
L
r
1
50
50
97
275
533.5
V
2.B9
Blanton
C
Mar -Set
4.5
50
225
650.25
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
144.5
275
79C75
W
2.63
Blanton
C
Mar -Set
4.5
50
225
591.75
L
Sept- r
1
5o
50
131.5
275
723.25
X
4.9
Blanton
C
Mar -Set
4.5
50
225
1102.5
1 L
Se t-A r
1 1
50
50
245
275
1347.5
Y
4.7
Blanton
C
Mar -Set
4.5
50
225
1057.5
L
Se t- r
1
50
5o
235
275
1292.5
2
4.7
Blanton
C
Mar -Set
1 4.5
50
225
1057.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
235
275
1292.5
AA
2.41
Blanton
I C
Mar -Set
1 4.5
50
225
542.25
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
120.5
275
662.75
BB
2.72
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
am
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
136
375
1020
CC
4.9
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
1592.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
245
375
1837.5
DD
2.38
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
773.5
L
Sept -Apr
1
50
50
119
375
892.5
EE
3.75
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
1218.75
L
Se t- r
t
so
50
167.5
375
1406.25
FF
2.45
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
796.25
L
Se t-A r
1
50
50
122.5
375
918.75
GG
2.67
Norfolk
C
Mar -Set
6.5
50
325
867.75
L
Se t- r
1
50
50
133.5
375
1001.25
Tpfa19: 305.61 93534.75 15280.5 108815.3
3(a) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bennuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized I unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 lbs N / bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs N 1 ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N / ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 lbs N / bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 lbs N / ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N / lbs; lint
G
Fescue - Grazed
50 lbs N / ton
H
Fescue - Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
I
Oats
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N / bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 lbs N / acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 lbs N / acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N / cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N / bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N 1 acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4of8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications RAW r/animal Farm Total/ r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
Farrow to Feeder 1
3000 Farrow to Finish 4.1 12300
Wean to Feeder 0.072
10496 Feeder to Finish 0.36 3778.56
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 16078.56 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 80392.8 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 267 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 643.1424 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
'This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5 of 8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract Hydrant
Type
Crop
Inthr
* inches
1023 A
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
B
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
C
Caroline
C
0.4
1
D
Caroline
C
0.4
1
E
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
F
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
G
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
H
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
1
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
J
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
K
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
L
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
M
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
N
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
O
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
P
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
Q
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
R
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
S
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
subl
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
sub2
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
sub3
Blanton
C
0.35
1
sub4
Nor/Bla
C
0.5
1
sub5
Blanton
C
0.35
1
1023 subA&B
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
subC&D
Caroline
C
0.4
1
subE
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
subF&G
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
subH
Goldsboro
C
0.4
1
subl&J
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
subK-0
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
subR&S
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
T
Blanton
C
0.35
1
U
Blanton
C
0.35
1
V
Blanton
C
0.35
1
W
Blanton
C
0.35
1
X
Blanton
C
0.35
1
Y
Blanton
C
0.35
1
Z
Blanton
C
0.35
1
AA
Blanton
C
0.35
1
BB
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
CC
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
DID
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
EE
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
FF
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
GG
Norfolk
C
0.5
1
6of8

Additional Comments:
Sub field acreage is the balance of the total field acreage minus wet acres.
This acreage is claimed when making application with an aerway machine.
All subfield acreage is optional for the plan.
This plan adds reel pulls as identified as pulls T-GG.
V7111 Plan updated to reflect row cropland being changed to Bermuda Hay
and Small Grain.
7of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: Farms 27- 30
Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. Vwe know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
a
Name of Technical Specialist: Amy J. Elmore _
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC.
Address: 2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone: [phone]
Signature:
G-1 -it
Date
8of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recievinq crop type, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than.5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be,applied.to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are -installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2of3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3of3

li.N. Sl iJ 1T iEl J'J ..L J��!JJ1J�
rnX L'F1T t./ I I I'It J -
Jun 17 03 01:41p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933139
p.l
Murphy -Brown LLC
FAX TRANSMISSION
FRONI.
DATE:
PAGES:
PO Drawer 856
822 Hwy, Z4 West
Warsaw, NC 28393
Tel; 910.293.5334
Fax [phone]
8
COMMENTS. -15 V�_PA I_Vl I �
Z:? _3

R\ r,ATr,/71ME JUN. -17' 03MJE) 12 39 9'iO293'a13S
Jun 17 03 01:41p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933138
P 06
p.2
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number
Facility Name:
Certi red Operator Name:
66-30
County, Northampton
Smith`eld-Carroll's 27.30
Terri McClintock Operator Number: 27441
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spilk ays: and from the current liquid level
in the lagcon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoons 12 Lagoon Lagoon 4 Lagoon
Lagoon NamellC: 27 28 29 30
Spillv,ay(Y or N): N N N N
Level(inches): 25 16 14 9
2. Check all applicable items
X Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or m❑re siructures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges,
X Liquid level is :^. ithin the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures, A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
VVaste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bciume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and ," aulecl is reflected in section III tables. Included .vithir this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DVVQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CA%N;vtP.
X Operation will be partially or fully depopulated,
-Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animai units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels ar,d herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to becin land application of waste:
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached flan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information i5
accurate and correct.
AA5s_j�_ Phone: T - i
c cility 0,xnprAlan6ger (print) r I
Date: `
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
7ii

nX 34TE /T f ME J1).N. - 1 7' D3 tTUFI 1 2 : 39 t, 1 i.i29331 35
.dun 17 03 01:41p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933138
p.3
PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIE:
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID): 27
2, Curren; liquid volume in structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 12.0 inc .es
b, designed structural freeboard zone 12.0 Inches
(Normally 12 inches or greater)
c. line b - line a (iInches within structural freeboard) = i^ches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 262892 ft`
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft- gallons
3. Projected vclume of v)2ste liquid produced during draw do:v,n period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of ,,taste produced according to structural design 346039 ft'
h, current herd # 1 500 certified herd #1 1000
actual Waste produced = current nerd 4 x line g =
certified herd
i. volume of :wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 5 days/line f =
a. Total volume of waste to be land applied during 5 day draw down
I. total volume to be land applied line e + line k =
173020 ffJ
rt
300C971 ft
98303 gallons
98303 gallons
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS. (Click on the next Structure tab shown below;
PoA (5 Dav) 2121/00

R\ DA7F,/T1VF Ji)N. - 17' 03 (Tr JF) i 2 39
Jun 17 03 01;41p MURPHY-BROWN
5102S33138 p.4
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL EACUTIE`
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID): 28
2. Current liquid volume in structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 12.0 €nches
b. designed structural freeboard zone 12.0 inches
(Normally 12 inches or greater)
c. line b - line a (inches within structural freeboard) = inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation} 262379Iftz
e. iine c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonsfft3 gailons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. 'temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. voiume of waste produced according to structural design 346039 ft3
h. current herd # 5001 certified herd # 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h+ i +j) x 7,48 x 5 daysllire f=
4. Total volume of waste to be land applied during 5 day draw down
I. total volume to be land applied line e + line k =
17302C ft'
l �ft�
9505 ft3
29
98180 gallons
98180 gallons
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS. (Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA d5 Davi 21'21i00

RX iaA Ei7iNIE JUiti -17' i3 T .]Ei i= Z9 aii}_g33i36
Jun 17 03 01:41p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933138
p.5
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILll
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I, TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (!D): 1 29
2. Current liquid volume in structural freeboard
a, current liquid level according to n'1arker 12.0 Inches
b. des'lgned structural freeboard zone 12.0 inches
(Normally 12 inches or greater)
c, line b -line a (Inches within structural freeboard) = inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) L 267487 ft'
e. !!ne c/12 x line d x 7.45 gallons/ft gallons
3. Protected volume cf ::-aste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 1 1801days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural deslen 346039 ft3
h, current herd #F 500 certified herd 41 1400
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.46 x 5 daysiline f =
4. Total volume of waste to be land apoiied during 5 day draw down
I. total volume to be land applied line e + line k
173020 ft'
305243 ft3
99372 gallons
99372 gallons
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS. (Click on the next Structure tab shown.below
PoA f5 Dav) 2/21 /00

K\ D H i- E/ 11 H E J IJ N. - 1/ 11 J { T l} I. 7 1 2: J C i `I 1 l l 2 `1 J J 1 J tl
Jun 17 03 01:42p MURPHY-BROWN
910293313e
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIE;
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name?Identifier (ID): l 30
2 Current liquid volume in structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 8.0}inches
b, designed structural freeboard tore 12.0 inches
(Normally 12 incllas or greater)
c. line b : line a (inches within structural Freeboard) = 4.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) ; 73628 ft2
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft' 432912 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw do:•rn period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 346039 ft,
h. current herd # 1 Oj certified nerd #1 lo00
actual waste produced = current herd # x lime g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporatior according to design
k. (lines h+ i +j) x 7.48 x 5 days/line f=
4. Total volume of waste to be land applied during 5 day draw down
I. total volume to be land applied line e + line k =
I73020
nin,
�--- 304776' ft
9^275 gallons
532188 gallons
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS. (Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (5 Day) 21'21100

R\ DATE/TIME :JUN.-17'03(7UE) 12:39 9102933138
Jun 17 03 01:42p MURPWY-BROWN
9102933138
r Df17
p.7
11. TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEE30ARD ELEVATIONS
FOR ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure ID: 27
Ilne I =
98303 gallons
2. structure ID: 28
11 .e 1 =
98180 gallons
3. structure ID: 29
line 1 =
99372 gallons
4, structure IDS 30
line l =
532188 gallons
5. structure ID:
line ! =
gallons
6. structure ID:
lire I =
gallons
n. lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6=
o. line n / 27154 =
828043 gallons
30.49 acre -inches
111. TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE WASTE DURING a DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOd
'While this section deals with hydraulic loading capacities, applications cannot exceed
agronomic rate for receiving crop according to its ce-tified .Vaste plan.
2Fields wilh no remaining PAN balance, no receiving crop, and/or completely saturated are
not considered available to recerve waste,
p. tract #
q. field #
r soil type
S. crop
t. acres
u. remaining
IRR-2 PAN
baldnc@
(Iblacra)
v. maximum
application, rate
(in/hr)
w, maximum
acclica;ion
amount (irChes)
1023
a
Norfolk
Bermuda
5.20
237
0.5
1
b
Norfolk
18ermuda
7.20
199
0,51
1
c
Carolina
leermuda
5.30
210
0.35
1
i
d
Caroline
Bermuda
8.30
217
0.35
1
i
e
Goldsboro
lBermuda
8.20
254
0.51
1
f
Goldsboro
Bermuda
4.001
251
0.51
1
Goldsboro
Bermuda
6.90
257
0.51
1
h
Goldsboro
Bermuda
7,40
2091
0.5
i
!
l Norfolk
Bermuda
25.40
200
0.5
1
'
Goldsboro
Bermuda
16.10
198
0.5
1
k
Norfolk
Bermuda
4.60
239
0,5
i I
I
Norfolk
Bermuda
4.60
239
0.5
1 }
m
Norfolk
Bermuda
24.00
171
0,5
1
n
Norfolk
Bermuda
14.90
233
o
Norfolk
Bermuda
4.901
184
0.5
11
x, total acres available during 5 day draw down (sum of column Q = 147.00 acres
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL HYDRAULIC LOAD TO BE LAND APPLIED PER ACRE
y line o = 0.21 inches per acre to be applied within 5 days
PoA A' Day) 2/2'1100

R\ GATE/71ME JUN_-t7'03(TUE) i2 39
Jun 17 03 01:42p MURPWY-BROWN
9t02933139 005
9102933138 p.8
line x
if unable to land apply hydraulic load listed in line y, list course of action here including pump
and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump $ haul and herd reduction options,
recalculate new hydraulic load based on new information. _
Finishing population has been completed. Sow herd depopulation will begin this week for all farms on this site,
and wick continue until ali lagoons are brought back into compliance.
Flan to land apply hydraulic load:
1. Describe moisture conditions of fieids? (e.g. Is there water standing in field: does irrigation
Equipment mar down m field; "trafficability" across soils; will soils absorb application wltnout runoff
2. Date and amount of cast rainfall event?
DATE: I 06106Q3
AMOUNT: 1 1.00 inches
w. Given eptimur',, soil and weather conditions, is Irrigation equipment capable of applying the volume in
iine "n' w appropriate seasonal {Le, winler) app'1caycn ratesy.,!:n!n n 0a
yes
5. Irrigation schedule for next 5 days - include dailv schedule: or000sed application rates and amounts
per irrigation event; changes made in gun sizes, nozz;es, "o" rings, operating time, travel speed, etc. to
meet proposed changes in application rates and amounts; and any other information_ for consideration.
PoA (5 Day) 2121100

RX DATF./TIME �JUN. -17' 03(TUE) 12'79 �IO2�33?3S
Jun 17 03 01:42p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933138
P 009
9.9
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIE:
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
t. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 27
2. Current iiquid voiume in 25 yr 124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current iiquiu level according tc marker 25.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = -6 ir&es
d. too of dike surface area according to design
(area at beiow structural freeboard elevation) 262892 ftz
e line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonsfft�-983216 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down, period
f. 'temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 3460,39 ft3
h. current herd # 7­5_W certf"ed `nerd #100fl
actual waste produced = current nerd # x line g =
certified 'nerd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines in + 1 + j) x 7.48 x 30 days?!ire f=
4, Total PAN to be land applied durir,g dra.v dov.,n period
I. current ^laste analysis dated 051031200311
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x lire I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
173020 fL
L-3000�9? ft3
589819 gallons
i-40b511000 gai.
-551 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 21121,'00

RS DATulTirviE :iSjN. -17' 03(TOF) i2.3c �i1G29ooio6
.dun 17 03 01:42p MURPHY-BROWN
S102933138
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIE:
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
?. Structure Name/identifier fV: 28
2. Current iiquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 1 6.gJ inc'nes
b. designed 25 yr.124 nr. storm & structural freeboard L 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 3.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at belci v structural freeboard elevation) 262379 ft`
e, line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons* 490649 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temperary storage period according to structure} design 180days
g. volume of waste {produced according to structural design 346039 ft3
h. current nerd 500 certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x k e 5
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7,48 x 30 days/li, �e f=
4. Total RAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 05?03/2003
m, ((!ines e + k)?1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
173020 ft'
01f,3
299506 ft3
589082 gallons
1.7 Ibs/1000 gal.
1835.6 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

RN DATE/TIME JUN-17'03(TUE) 1-1 39 IVZ433:3�
Jun 17 03 01:42p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933130
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO 13E LAND APPLIEC PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/ldentifier (ID). 29
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr,/24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a, current liquid level according to marker 14.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr, storm & structural freeboard 19.0linches
c line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 5.0 Inches
d, top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 267487 ft`
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gailonslft' 833668 gallons
3. Projected volume cf waste liquid produced during dray, down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g, volume of waste produced according to structural design 346039 ft3
h. current herd r 500 certified herd # 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfail over evaporation according to design
k, (lines h + i +j) x 7,48 x 30 daysAne f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
i. current v.vaste analysis dated I MG312003
m. ((lines e + k)/1,000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE:.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
173020 ft'
� 0 ft3
�� 3052d3 ft3
596234 gallons
1.50 Ibsl i 000 gal.
2144.9 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

RS DATE/TIME JUn.-17'03fTUE1 12,39 9102933i38
Jun 17 03 01:43p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933138
P 012
p.12
PLAN OF ACTION (PGA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIE!
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
i. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name,'ldentifier (ID): 30
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 12.0inches
b, designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard ', 9.01 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 7.0 inches
d. tap of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 1 73628ft`
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallonslft' 757597 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during dr21N down period
ten,porary storage period according to structure! design 180 days
g volume of waste produced according to structural design 346039 ft'
h. current herd # 500 certified herd 91 1 oe0
actuai waste produced = current herd # x line g =
cer-ified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfaii over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i t j) x 7.48 x 30 daysllire f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw dowr period
i, current waste analysis dated 1 05/03/2003
m. s(Vines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
173020 ft'
304776 ft3
595652 Gallons
1.70' ibsl! 00G gal.
2300.5 lbs. PAN
PcA (30 Day) 2/21/00

h\ DATE/TIh7E : JUN. - 1 7' 03 (TUE) S 2 : 39
Jun 17 03 01:43p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933138
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ANDIOR 25 YR.i24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1,
Structure ID: 27
line rn =
-551 ib PAN
2.
Structure ID: 28
!ine m =
1835.5 Ib PAN
3.
Structure ID: 29
line m =
2144.9 lb PAN
4.
Structure lb: 30
line n =
2300.5 lb'PAN
5,
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure iD.
line ,m-
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6= 5730.2IbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD_ DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD
0. tract �
P. field A
q, crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN t�alance
(it/acre)
t, TOTAL PAN
JEALANCE FOR
FiEL❑ (lbs.)
column r x s
u, appticatior vrirdow'
1023
P
Bermuda
4.70
278.00
9306.E
Mar -Sept
R
Bermuda
2.80
289.00
809.2
hoar -Se t
S
Bermuda
2.40
287.00
688.8
Mar -Sept
See Narr.
A-Q
Bermuda
147.00
75.00
11025.0
Mar -Sept
Q
Bermuda
4.90
255.00
':249.5
Mar -Sept
I
I
I ..
I
I
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v, Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 15C79.1 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w, Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 5730.2 lb. PAN
PcA (30 Day) 2!21!00

RX DATE/TIME L JiUN. -17' 03('TUF) 12 3S? 8!U2973139
Jun 17 03 01r43p MURPHY-BROWN
P 0!4
9102933138 p.14
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance'(line v from section 111) _
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _
15079-1 1b. PAN
-9349 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit, If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, nerd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate ne v PAN
i based on new 'information. If new fields are to be included as an, option for !ovler!ng lagoon level, add these
fteids to the PAN balance table and recalcu;ate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
-receiving facility.
irrigation onto exist!ng spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit.
!PAN Appiication during the 5 day draw down equals an average of 21.7
libsiacre on Fields A-O. 1-PAN balance on these fields will actually be in excess of the 75
Ibs shown.
PoA (30 Day) 2121W

RX DATE' T !ME : Jt,1N' - 1 ." ^T iTUE) 12 ICJ 9:0253 :1 s
Jun 17 03 01:44p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933138
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILIT4ES
Facility Number: 66-34 County': Norlhampton
Facility Name: Smith field-Carroli's Farm! 1
Certified Operator Name: Lee Farmer Operator Number: 28699
1. Current liquid levels) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the !agoon to the
lo'v est point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current iiquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1
Lagoon NaimmeliD: 11S
SpillhAay(Y or N): N
Level inches): 11
2. Check all applicable items
Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
X Liquid level is within the designed siructural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is -within, acceptable range.
tNaste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolurne and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section lii tables inciuded within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and rece;'ving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the OWo prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility`s CAVJ%1P.
Operation will be partially or ful)y depopulated.
'Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
'if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of -waste:
hereby certify that l have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Phone:
_ Facility nerlManager !print)
�Lr _ Date: _1� 1 -�
Facility Ownerlllanager (Signature)

DATE%711ME :JiIN. -I V 03(T1.3E) 1_ 39 il(i_ 133i33
Jun 17 03 01:44p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933138
P. 0 1 I"
F.16
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIE:
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1, Structure Name/Identifier (ID): F _-Ts
2, Current liquid volume in structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 11.0 inc .,es
b. designed structural freeboard zone 12,0 inches
(Normally 12 inches or greater)
c. line b -line a ('Inches within structural freeboard) = 1.0 inches
d, top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 791 28ft'
e, line c/12 x line d x 7.48 galionslfti 49323 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f, temporary storage period according to structural design 90Mdays
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 173019 ft3
h. current herd # I 1000i certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified nerd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k, {lines h+ i+ 0 x 7,48 x 5 days/line f=
4. Total volume of waste to be land applied during 5 day draw dov.,n
I. total volume to be land applied line e + line k =
173019 ft2
I uJit3
103473 61 ft3
114893 ga!lons
� I
164221 gallons
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS. (Click on the next Structure tab shown belowl
PoA (5 Day) 2;21/00

k` SATE/TIME JUN. - 1 7' 03 ME) 1 :39 910129331"8
Jun 17 03 01:44p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933136
P 01 7
p. 17
It. TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
FOR ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1 , structure ID: 11 S lire I = 164221 gallons
2, structure 1D: like I = gallors
3. structure ID: lisle l = gallons
4. structure ID iine I = gallons
5. structure ID; line i = gaiions
6. structure ID: line I = gallons
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+g=
o. line n 127154 =
164221 gallons
6.05 acre -inches
Ill. TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE WASTE DURING 5 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOd.2
'VV`hile this section deals wvith hydraulic loading capacities, applications cannot exceed
agrcnomic rate fcr receiving crop acccrdirg to its certified waste piar,.
'Fields with no remaining PAN balance, no receiving crop, andlor compietely saturated are
not considered available to receive waste,
p tract m
y. field #
'. soil type
s. crop
It. acres
u. remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance
I(Ib;acre)
v. maximum
appkcation rate
(Wn')
w. maximum
aNPlicaticn
amount flrches)
11
IS1
Bermuda
1.061
295
o.61
1
2S
lBermuda
2.12
l 275
G., 51
1
3S
Bermuda
2.431
305
0.5
1
A
Bermuda
4.311
201
0.5
1
B
Bermuda
4.11
155
0.5
1
C
Bermuda
5.10
219
0.5
1
D
Bermuda
5,22
205
0.5
1
E
Bermuda
5.28
290
0.5
1 i
F
Bermuda
4.11
257
0.5
#
G
Bermuda
1.07
233
0.5
1
I
I
x. total acres available during 5 day draw down (sum of column t) = 34.81 acres
IV. FACILITY'S POA OVERALL HYDRAULIC LOAD TO BE LAND APPLIED PER ACRI:
y line o = 0, 17 inches per acre to be applied within 5 days
POA f5. Day) 21ZT1U

R\ DATE/ f WE JUN. - 1 743 iTIJEj 2 : 39 91029331 3S
Jun 17 03 01:45p MURPHY-BROWN
P. U1,
9102933138 p.18
line x
If unable to land apply hydraulic load listed in line y, list course of action here including pump
and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options,
recalculate new hydraulic load based on new intormation.
As of 4i18103, partial depopulation wick be complete. Will have removed 2632 finishing animals from this site.
to land apply hydraulic load:
1. Describe moisture conditions of fields? (e.g. Is there water standing kn field; does irrigation
enuioment mar down in field: "trafficabiiity" across soils; v,Jll soils absorb application *thout runoff
2. Date and amount of last rainfall event?
DATE: 1 06116/03
n event per tieIC:
AMOUNT; I 1.00inches
4. Given ootimum sail and weather conditions. is irrigation ecuioment caaable of aeolvine the volume in
line "n" at appropriate seasonal i.e. winter ap lication rates ,vghin 5 days?
i
i
I
I
i
i
i
5. Irrigation schedule for next 5 days - include daily schedule; proposed application rates and amounts
per irrigation event; changes made in gun sizes, nozzles, "o" rings, operating time, travel speed, etc. to
meet proposed changes in appllcauon rates ana amcums; ana any Omer imormauon ror conslae,ration.
PoA (5 Day) 2121i00

ri :\ L1.4' 1' E /' I' l[A E iUN. -17' 03(TUE) 12:3v ?10293.3;3&
Jun 17 03 01:45p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933138
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Struc`.ureName/ldentifler(ID)-, Ills
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 12.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr,/24 hr. storm $ structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red Lone) = 7,0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation I 79128 ft2
e_ line cl12 x line d x 7,48 gallons/ft' 345262 gallons
3. Projected vclume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structurai design 901days
g volume of waste produced according to structural design i 173019 W
h. current herd # 1000 certlfied herd # 10G0
actual waste produced = current herd ri x line g = 173019 ft'
certified herd #
i, volume of wash water according to structural design 0 ft3
j, excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 103473,E ft'
k. (ines h + i +j) x 7.48 x 30 dayslllne f= 689388 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
current waste analysis dated 05!03l2003 2.30 lbs! 000 gal
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I = 2379.7 lbs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2l21/00

Nr 08 04 04:20p MURPHY-BROWN
9102933138
Murphy -Brown LLC
FAX TRANSMISSION
TO: ''_ .O 0)�.j
FROM: i �cYll
DATE. -
PAGES:
r
COW NTS: V
PO Urvm 8$6
822 Hwy. 24 Wen
Warsaw, NC 28398
Tel [phone]
Fax: [phone]
i

Mar 08 04 04:20p MURPHY-BROWN 9102933138 p.2
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 66-30 County: Northampton
Facility Name: Farm 27-30
Certified Operator Name: Terri McClintock Operator Number: 27441
1. Current liquid levels) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon NameAD: 29S 30S
Spillway(Y or N): N N
Level(inches): 17 15
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges,
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste Is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
informatian. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
-AS Phone:
Facility wnar/Manager (print)
Wlt'G P. %,F Date_
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

Mar 08 04 04:20p MURPHY-BROWN 9102933138 p,3
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIE:
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID); 129S
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a, current liquid level according to marker 16.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (Inches in red zone) = 3.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 88360 fe
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallonsR 165233 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 346041 W
h. current herd # F-1-0-0-01 certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 02/09/2004
m. ((lines e + kV1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
346041 ft3
®ft3
305243 ft3
811934 gallons
1.80 11bs11000 gal.
1758.9 lbs. PAN

Ma'r 08 04 04:20p MURPHY-BROWN 91C2933130 p•4
PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITY
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 130S
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 15.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm 8. structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 4.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
.(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 305448 fe
e, line cl12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 761584 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 346041 ft3
h. current herd # 7-1-0-0-01 certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 346041 ft3
certified herd #
I. volume of wash water according to structural design ft3
j, excess rainfall over evaporation according to design �341084 ft3
k. (lines h + 1 + i) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f= 856616 gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 02/09/2004 1.60 Ibs/1000 gal.
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line 1 = 2589.1 lbs. PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

Mar 08 04 04:20p MURPHY-BROWN 9102933138 p•5
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: 29 S
line m =
1758.9 lb PAN
2. Structure ID: 30S
line m =
2589.1 ib PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
line rn =
lb PAN
5. Structure ID:
lime m =
Ib PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 4348.0 Ib PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWI`
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD
o. tract # p. field # q. crop r. acres s. remaining IRR t TOTAL PAN u. applicadon window
2 PAN balance BALANCE FOR
(lb/acre) FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
1023 4 Bermuda 27.80 200.00 5560.0 Mar -Sept
V KilO uv"1 .1114.1 VjJ 0114111{J. G'lp vaIVI I lia 0 VI 110/µ W%jw CtjjVi1LCILIVII V01V11111mv v040 1u1 QvG11Q1d10
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 5560.0 Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 4348.0 lb. PAN
�I
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

' Mar 08 04 04;20p MURPHY-BROWN 8102933138 p.6
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (fine v from section ill) = 5560.0 lb. PAN
Y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _ -1212 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here Including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility. _
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed. Water will be transferred to lagoon at Farm 28 on same site. Aerway is
currently applying from this lagoon at this complex.
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

,03/01/2007 `i'HU 11: 15 FAX [phone] WIRLNMI -- 4 DWQ Raleigh
I?j001/008
MurF.hy-I3ro�n L«
Mul-Ay Brown LLC
1?0 Box 856
2822 H.wy 24 West.
Warsaw, NC 28398
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Fax Transmittal Sheet
..1O A,_ From:
Uione: - - - - — — -Date;
ate: CC,
❑urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply C1 Please Recycle

,03/01/2007 THU 11:16 FAX [phone] WRLNMI -.-#a DWQ Raleigh
Q 002/008
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
8.10
County: _Hertford.
Facility Name: Farm 33 & 35
Certified Operator Name: Timmy Hedgepeth Operator Number:
986038
1. Current liquid level(s) In inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID: 33 P 33 S 35 P 35 S
Spillway(Y or N): N N N N
Level(inches): 14 26 14 14
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within -acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance Is within acceptable range.
X Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Boiume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's GAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
}Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 312l2007
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
R O Britt
Phone: [phone]
Fa Owner/Manager (print
(V Date
chit wn M i to )
3/1/2007

03/01/2007 THU 11:18 FAX [phone] WRLNMI DWQ Raleigh
Q 003/008
li. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.I24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID:
33 (Primary)
2.
Structure ID:
33 (Secondary)
3.
Structure ID:
35 Primary
4.
Structure ID;
35 - Secondary
5. Structure ID:
6. Structure ID:
line m = 4350.9 lb PAN
line m = -44 lb PAN
line m = 3899.6 lb PAN
line m = 690.8 lb PAN
line m = lb PAN
line m = lb PAN
n. lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 8897.0 lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lb$.)
column r x s
u. application window'
Farm 33
B
Fescue
7.60
102.86
781.7
Aug- Jul
G
Fescue
5.58
169.16
943.9
Aug- Jul
H
Fescue
5.44
168.04
914.1
Aug -July
I
Fescue
1.54
167.83
258.5
Aug- Jul
J
Fescue
6.71
86.70
581.8
Aug- Jul
K
Fescue
8.56
167.96
1437.7
Aug- Jul
L
Fescue
8.56
167.90
1437.2
Aug- July
Farm 27-30
D
Small Grain
8.30
37.04
307.4
Sept -April
E
Small Grain
8.20
35.16
288.3
Sept -April
L
Small Grain
4.60
35.82
164.8
Sept -April
M
Small Grain
24.00
20.87
500.9
Sept -April
N
Small Grain
14.90
14.44
215.2
Se t-A ril
Small Grain
25.40
60.00
1270.0
Sept -April
J
Small Grain
16.10
50.00
805.0
Sept -April
G
Small Grain
6.90
50.00
345.0
Sept -April
H
Small Grain
7.40
50.00
370.0
Sept -April
K
Small Grain
4.60
50.00
230.0
Sept -April
1
Wheat
20.10
144.00
2894.4
Sept -April
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 13745.9 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to.be land applied (line n from section 11) =
8897.0 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

03/01/2007 THU 11:20 FAX [phone] WRLNMI 4-» DWQ Raleigh
IM004/008
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section Ill) =
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) =
13745.9 lb. PAN
-4849 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
We are going to pump and haul water from Farm 33 to Farm 30. the primary and secondary lagoon
Farm 30 are: Primary 22" and Secondary 41°. Waste Analysis: 1122107 2.4. 1.3 for Farm 30.
I7he crop and field info for Farm 27-30 is listed as indicated on the summary sheet.
at
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

03/01/2007 THU 11:21 FAX [phone] WRLNlit1 ---- DWQ Raleigh
[it 005/008
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): 33(Primaryl
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 14.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm 8. structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (Inches in red zone) = 5.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 180864 11
e. line c112 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft' 563693 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 346040 ft3
h. current herd # 1 dQ0 certified herd # 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 1/22/2Q07
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
346040 ft'
198950 ft3
679421 gallons
3.50]Ibs/1000 gal.
4350.9 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

03/01/2007 THU 11:23 FAX [phone] WRLNMI 444 DWQ Raleigh
Q 006/008
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 33 Secondar
2, Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a, current liquid level according to marker 26.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = -7 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 157655 W
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3-687901 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f, temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 346040 ft3
h. current herd # F-70-0-01 certified herd # 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 346040 ft3
certified herd #
i, volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7,48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current.waste analysis dated 1 1/22/2007
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
ft3
173420 ft3
647593 gallons
1.10 lbs11000 gal.
-44 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

.03/01/2007 THU 11:24 FAX [phone] WRLNMl DWQ Raleigh
IZ O07/008
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I, TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): 1 35 Prima
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 14.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 5.0 inches
d, top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 196826 fe
e, line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft3 613441 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g, volume of waste produced according to structural design 346040 ft3
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I, current waste analysis dated 1 1/22/2007
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
346040 f t3
0 ft3
204580 ft3
686440 gallons
3.00 lbs/1000 gal.
3899.6 lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

03/01/2007 THU 11:26 FAX [phone] WRLNM1 DWQ Raleigh
2 008/008
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/ldentifler (ID): 35 - secondary
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 14.0 inches
b_ designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
C. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 5.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 167515 fe
e. line c/12 x line d x 7,48 gallonslft3 522088 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 801 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 346040 ft3
h. current herd # 1000 certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 346040 ft'
certified herd #
i, volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 1/22/2007
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
®ft3
17429 ft3
648681 gallons
0,58 Ibs/1000 gal.
6MB lbs. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21 /00

Mar 02 04 02:42p
MURPHY—BROWN
9102333138
P.I
Murphy -Brown LLC -
FAX TRANSMISSION
TO: ;► r
f
FROM: 1
DATE: C�
PAGES: cy. C , .
PO Drawer 856
822 Hwy. ZA West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Tel, 910.293.5334
Fax [phone]
COMMENTS;

Mar 02 04 02:43p MURPHY-BROWN 9102933138
p- 2
r
PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 66-30 County: Northampton
Facility Name: Farm 27-30
Certified Operator Name: Terri McClintock Operator Number: 27441
1. Current liquid levei(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways, and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID: Farm 29 S
Spilhvay(Y or N): N
Level(inches): 16
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance Is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled Is reflected in section III tables. included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
Information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered In the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest posslbie date to begin land application of waste:
hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and Included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is
accurate and correct.
Phone: 1 SZ to
/
Fa�,ci ity OwnertManager (print)
A)t&4'4r% P. / Date: 3 — l ` O
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)

Mar 02 04 02:43p MURPHY-BROWN 9102933138
p.3
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIE!
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/identifier (ID): 129 S
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 16.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 3.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 883fi0 fe
e. line CA 2 x line d x 7.48 galionslft' 165233 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 18--old ays
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 34fi041 fe
h. current herd # F-1-0-50-1 certified herd #1 1000
actual waste produced = cu[Lerg hgrdx line g=
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + J) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 02/09/2004
m. ((lines e + k)11000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100
346041 ft3
Lam, W
305243 ft3
811934 gallons
1.80 Ibs11000 gal.
1758.9 lbs. PAN

Mar 02 04 02:43p MURPHY-BROWN 9102933138
p.4
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITN
1. Structure 1D: 29 S
line m = 1758.9 lb PAN
2. Structure 1D:
line rn =
lb PAN
3. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6. Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n. lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6= 1758.9 lb PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWP
PEKIUU. UU NUT LI51 FIELUS 1U WHIGN PAN C:ANNUI lit APPLItU UUKINU IM19 :$U UAT PCKIUU
o. tract # P. field # q. crop r. acres s. remaining IRR t. TOTAL PAN u. application window'
2 PAN balance BALANCE FOR
(lb/acre) FIELD (lbs.)
column r x s
1023 4 Bermuda 27.80 275.00 7645.0 Mar -Sept
171o1G L.UI Itil IL "up wile II IV app I IV(iLILAI Vaka VI Iltmtu Lip appi Riallufl uVVIIII III 1W ucluz Iul avallaum
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 7645.0 Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 1758.9 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

Mar 02 04 02:43P MURPHY-BROWN 9102933138
p.5
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section lit) _
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) _
7645.0 lb. PAN
-6886 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit, if line y does not show as a deficit list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide Information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping K needed. Water will be transferred to lagoon at Farm 28 on same site. Aerway Is
currently applying from this lagoon at this complex.
PoA (30 Day) 2121/00

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
FILE ACCESS RECORD
SECTIO _ Y DATE/TIME
NAME R tn1 r&_n3 REPRESENTING
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the _Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public
records in our custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the
responsibility to the public to safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program
obligations. Please read carefully the following before signing the form.
1. Due to the large public demand for file access, we request that you call at least a day in
advance to schedule an appointment for file review so you can be accommodated.
Amointments are scheduled between 9:00 a.m._and -3:00 p.m on Tuesday Wednesday and
Thursday. Viewing time ends at 4:45 p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view
the files to the extent that time and staff supervision are available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name or incident number as appropriate.
The number of files that you may review at one appointment will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits.
Cost per copy is $0.05 cents for ALL co ies front and back will be $0.10 cents per copy.
Payment is to be made by check, money order, or cash in the administrative offices.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU RECEIVED THEM. Files may not be taken
from the office. No briefcases, large totes, etc. are permitted in the file review area. To
remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor for
which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $25.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
6. The customer must present a photo ID, sign -in, and receive a visitor sticker prior to reviewing
files.
FACILITY NAME
a
2. ' fr 3 a
3. b
4.
5.
4
Ai at a an Name of Firm/Business Date
PleaSe ach a business card to this form if available
COUNTY
ND h 9-0 �
m� a 7
7 7 /.3 P°,) —o-
Time In Time Out

Type of Visit; Co.5pirance inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up Q Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: , 6 - 2 �{� Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: 2 if1 3 4) Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: i~ AP i eph&—rt% Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
r Jl
r
1 t S IfMf r ff7ffit, 1 1`.m °��
�ffi�1!
11 f
:
fj'�ir� r �rf(Tf% �f d
r 1
1 ,
rkYill1ryai��'f
,I{�fY��!V:�ju��f��l�l7f Jr.41
IN,: if
�rfG�Grr�`fjt�'.
F 1 �}(
1
,Il, I rl l�i,l;(rjpr,�j�rt
•llir II r1�d Fk+�ei�
"�
.� Ian :r is
xa
•V
1
f !
�
{
�-
l�
�+t
ffj'Yf�IJ�i�
aa},l�
R!f
�i 1f Y C
Yf�
h' �1 IiGr
� I
��
■
� .
--
,�f=
91,
if
1,� f P�lY I }
ft'
IN
mna
�:
HIP
. .�,
■
��■
f�lY
■
:
�■■
Nil
■
• {
�w
-
■
�
�
r,�
■
. .. { . .
�
�
�
if r r1N !f{y,r
-ff�N',iIY1Fftflf�f.��iJY;lylYr�fj+,.�
{ f kY
May y�.
+,ER 1A 1{ii'I . IYrF frN {� R%!
fr
■
--
Y�
rf�
I f 1k Uf k 1 1 Fy rY lff , h
�or•F.J'�llydhr
Y�
- tl f Y
q�l:l.l'.11
�I IfdFjl
j �,111
r4�`,1+bVff'r !I,
, r „ f, ,f
f
:.r
■
--
1rf
>ifs:t',f�lr�rl�f=,��'f�h''�kf!>lp'Iflf��r,.-
IIifIN N'(Ibrl :f'`I¢4k'1' IA^F lkr f W 1 6 �f W !k� ,.Y
frfi+ ,,�.ys.
Ire..
enY
-
■
��
yY''
■
f Aiff�`flfJt'
�� �ffd
f�+. � �y[f�'rY�,.Ylft�I}s k _..lsaa sf �I Is
�'1"�IJT'�7�Yfk JrJ if
1i•lp
,�Po r �t
Discharees and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No [] NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ YesVNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number; - 3D 1 Date of Inspection: 10 - 2 —1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
o NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA [] NE
Structure 1 Structur 2 Struct e 3 Structure 4
Identifier: �� 5 30
Structure 5
Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ N E
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
XNoO
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
0 NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
/No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): LQ�HkdA� �7�f►'R� ._, — _,
a
13. Soil Type(s):
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
O N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
0 NA
❑ NE
16,
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components ofthe CAWMP readily available? Ifyes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers `0 Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectiFNo
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? D Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility 'Number: 1�- 3 Zo S 0 Date of Inspection: 10' L f
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes eNo NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(cs) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other.
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0 No
0 NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
5[ y o5 e Su-ry 2 y Z 2 `l $
? 0P) % y. 6 3
3 0 (P) iv : u- 2 ?_
D > S.
�u(5)��j,��
d y - a . 2' L
C4.t t br0141d4v
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: (3Lc s ae
Page3of3
0,
0 a
,7- 0-r7
Phone: C/2-a6
Date:
21412015

(Type of Visit: 2JCompliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: �outtne 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7
Arrival Time:
Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: r__A t21011
It/ 3 Q
Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: U AiL u k, eN Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle C*apacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
71
eeder to Finish
U
airy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
©, Pmoult ,
Ca aci
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Do p 3G
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
I
113eef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Qther
Turkey Poults
Other
IELIOther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [:]Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[] NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
[] NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection: e - �} -
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Z ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
ZONA
❑ NE
Stni t re 1 Structure 2 St e 3 Struct ree 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:S I� f 5
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 7 0 Z. D r" i
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity o any of the structures ob6rved?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmFD
eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [-]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s): 15er Mh C<4 , 5"n--
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Z
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
Y❑
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
t7. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements [-]Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ YesRNA
`NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste TrWeather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspectioudge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

F acility,Number: jDate of Inspection: 0._ r
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
gNo
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No [] NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[—]Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to -question #) Eaiplain any YES answers `andlo`r any additional recommendations or any other comments:�.,, ,� �=
Use,drawings,offacility to better, ex lain�s€tuatiops.:(use additional' ages as necessary): ` ' ` ' ,�
5(14d5eS9►-V42y 30jS 3
f IV - H r1 0
tJ = 0 6� 3
.69 Sz3
o �- 3• � I
0
IV - 41. Eli
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: t3Lt S 40Zs/fir!/ - Date: IL "—/ " / Z
Page 3 of 3 21412015

d ---, 2.—( G
` Type of Visit: 'f Co nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: /© Departure Time: Zp d County: Region:
Farm Name: +^ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: c ic),Otl Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Design
C*urrent
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultr',y
Capacity
Pop.
C«attle C•apactty Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
-Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
' ,
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean.`
D esign
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr1 Pon itr.
C►a acit
P,a
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layer
Beef Feeder
IF
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharp-es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made`? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
Vfl NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
NA
Vo[C—]
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
NA
0 NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 214120.15 Continued

Facilit Number: 6Tp- 30 jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Flo NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Strufture ] Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: / f 30
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 13t7r�f / 3 0" 3 03 �
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental r at, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes;No
No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): e3 2-Y, -t A- jog , Ton - G`j rq- c r1 J
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement`?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes P
NA ❑ NE
❑ YesVN❑NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNor-1
NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stock ing ❑Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Slu Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

FAcili Number: - 3 jDate of )ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesrNo
NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern'?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [] No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to 6etter.ezplain situations (use additional pages as necessary): ,-
'o
S .s
F►4-12w� �-'7 ��r 7 ►n A r �l�
0
3,Zb
33
rV
1 ri l
�Lr Z 'Z
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: 22Lit 2 fi 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: f 3�
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412015

t
Type of Visit: Co anee Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
/
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Farm Name:.�h-,-
b
_
Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: t2' Dkte_ JJ
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
County:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pap.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy
Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
acit
Non -Dai
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Ycs No ❑ NA ❑ NE
D' h t d t ❑Structure ❑ A 1' t'on Field ❑Other
isc arge ongma e a . pp ica
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N D NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2014 Continued
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2014 Continued

3a
Facili Number: a Date of inspection: —/
r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
A
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
Oo�
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: -7
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�;�No��aN­A
NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yeso
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
thr t, notify
DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[] Yes
No [] NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [3 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[] PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): O r'nu
T'^
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a tack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ YesgNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste T
nsfers ❑ Weather
Code
Sludge
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectiV.N
Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

• 3d
Facility Number: 113ate of Inspection-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o 0 NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �No
NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[:]Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
C] NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question, ##) ,Explain any YES.answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use.drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
L(8 c: C4-3�
11 = 57 •� 9
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: [ (t ,S 494L _PtLAe1_ i, { Date: - I
Page 3 of 3 21412014

fI -U-oy
(Type of Visit: C pliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit• O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2 (- Arrival Time: Q L Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: YYi 7 7 '' Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: G Ih a f & In t e") Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultr
Wean to Finish La er
Design
Ft—)a c i t7v=
Current
Pop.
Design Current
C►attle C►►opacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder JE Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder D , P,oult , H
Farrow to Finish Layers
Dai Heifer
Design
Ca aci
Current
P,o ..
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
LL_I ° ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [] NE
Struple 1 Structure 2 StructUre 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: J915, P S
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 7 Z 7,7
it 2 3 (off
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Z17No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental hreat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
Z <No[D NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes
No D NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure
to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptta��ble Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): � t1- j1?�✓'
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
—U 1V ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[—]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No 0" NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes o [] NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [] Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Ins ection: 12 ! S 7' (
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes <NoD NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes VNo
NA ❑ NE
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes
❑No
DNA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
0hin ents)(iefer to yuesti6n #) Explayn any YES an'swers.and/or, any additional_ recommendations ar= any -other comments - <
Use'drawmgs,oftifacility to bntter,,ex lain situationi'(use additionafl pa'gles'ass necessary) o ;.
2—,
Z?
30
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

t +Division of Water Quality
Facility Numbcr - 3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O+ Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: !r ' Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: rtA-(2-en 3 D Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: _ L� ! 4 L, 3 >q c Ly Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
Design
Swine CapacityWet
Wean to Finish
Current
Weilgn Current Design
Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity
La er Dairy Cow
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Dairy Heifer
Design Current Dry Cow
IQ) l;oultr- Ca aci KymP,o . Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Broad Cow
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes �No❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ro[o]
'NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facilit Number: 9 i4 jDate of Inspection: Z
/
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
E:rNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
To ❑ NA
❑ NE
Struc re 1 Structure 2 Structu 33' S,
'� Y
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: �Z 121 S 42 / 1 Jj' / j
�l-I
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): Q
Designed
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
hreat, notify DWQ
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environm;;�o
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
E] Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ErNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
E3No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
N
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): A� �r� ti /I A . -, 4 1 A
'rT—'
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes J N
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes l�1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements [I]Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis [3 Waste Transfers [] Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

WaclliO Number: - Date of Inspection: 2 A
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a -regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
[] Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any.YES answers and/or any- additional recomtnendations.orany',other' corimments.�
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages,as necessary)
For
r=1- 2 0, 'p- 7 r
To Lf r—e" &-s, k 3°
r,
q t?C(cl t
7Y t/
S o- i I S,,5, rylo_v C L-C
V i, JK s&t y
30 n/.7-• 5_�r7
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
0 e e,. 2v 1 2--
A/ 2 z- / / 2---
v s4 S3
Phone: ' /9 r ` y Z-O-,p
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r�`,S�G lYtz l,� �� Date: f I / 2-
Page 3 of 3 21412011

rZ7-
for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0
0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I
r I Arrival Time: © Departure Time: © County:
Farm Name: }�'1 —0 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: L l2 -QQ�1 Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
RNon-Laycr
Wet Poultry
Layer
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Cattle
DairyCaw
DairyCalf
DairyHeifer
Design
Capacity
Gurrent
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Feeder
Dt, L . ItrI Ga aci l;o .
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
on —Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
[] NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[:]Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
D YesrNNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
21412011 Continued

30
Facili umber: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes VNN
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structurg 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 3' P tl � o S A Q .S Y` I Ais'� I p �T s
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
r�
Observed Freeboard (in): Z T a �t 60 IUV&
5. Are there any immediate threa to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes;�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
l, notify DWQ
or environmeFNDNA
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes❑,NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑NA ❑ NE
Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etcF40
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window I� ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Types): i Or Ql cm-. r I7� �.�! � LF1 ��
13. Soil Type(s): /
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Zf o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ;N/'
❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
R_eguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfe ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall (:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspection ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

[Facility umber: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ,�I ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �j`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES, answers, and/or any additional recommendations.or.any, other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as neces'sa6)."
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: --H l — t"(2-y c)
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
U
Date: / / / 3 �3
21412011

type of visit: Ce Coin nspection V Uperation Review U structure t:valuation V I echnical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: r l Arrival Time:J__�ZJ Departure Time: D U County: Region:
Farm Name: FAr , 3 L Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: 6 %i2 lt?k t e-M/
Phone:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: a33 i J I K 19 ik"l Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design
Swine C►apacity
Wean to Finish
Current Design Current
Pop. Wet Poultry C►apacity Pop.
La er
Design
Cattle Capacity
Dai Cow
Current
Pop.
Wea to Feeder
eeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Fa w to Feeder
Non -Layer
DaiEX Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Design Current
Dr, P,oultr. Ca aci P■o
La ers
arrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
1Beef Feeder
Gilts
Non -Layers
Boars
Pullets
jBeef Brood Cow
Qther
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharp-es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
N [3 NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ YesVN
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

d
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: / ZJJ
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
E31No ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
to ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 3d ~ d "s 71
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
0<0 ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
ZN0 ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes L2-11*w ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste _Application /
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ —
Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Types)
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�TN9 ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
r
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
❑Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yesg;No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Zo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ' ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

j6
Neility Number: -n Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No NA NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit'? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
D Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question.#) Explain any YES answ rs' and/or any =additional re comriietidations orany otliie,6nimeii6i4 a �, r $;
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (useF,additiotial pages as necessary):+
�7
a N
n : 7D
Y/ 3 t✓3
b = 7
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3
21412011

Type of Visit F Co Hance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit A Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z t Arrival Time: 1 73 : 17 Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ig . � 0 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: -- V� co l 1 a Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = o ❑ I ❑ 4{ Longitude: ❑ o = 6 = u
lire-signmKgurrent
Design Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity
Population
t Pou
Weltry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
I
Dait Calf
eeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Gilts ❑ Non -Layers
❑ Boars
u
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
Other
❑Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ffN ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesrNE1
NA El NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

1
Facility Number: Date of Inspection Z
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box, ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes XfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Cl Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
NA
El NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ YesNA
;o:�
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
[I NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
A
No�[0:1
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or, Drawings:,',, `x: 4 '':� -A
PQ,,r?,- - s�o4� d h4z s�6,�1�fdd
Page 3 of 3 12128104

4 N.
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
IdentiFier: o p 3Q f 19P121S
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): :3 � '�] Q� �19 7
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 115o�E]
02<o ❑,NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
S. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes i�'NO [3NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) i
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No , [DNA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C 01'-4 SDti l�lghl' I r;�G✓ r`'tk� A
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
0. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
�rN; El NA ONE
No ❑ NA ElNE
❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
i. ._ a.. .; .:Oi B 9?.�.: 9 -� b p'xs „_e.s ;.. ...'.r �.. i �. ♦ "' &�Y 4,#
;,Comments;(refer to question, #) Ezplain•any YES answers and/or any'recommendations or any otherscomments
�
Use drawings,of iacilitygto beitter explain si`tnations. (useladditional pages as necessary). x & �
3-Ok� 'A.$�..
p.'wA
Reviewer/inspector Name � ' . s ;:,' t ' t ; `t ' t° Phone: '%�J �� tl
,. $a, _A-,e�.,..t, _
4.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: tTP/ Date: G1 / 7-
Page 2 of 3 T 12128104 Continued

t
G zcc?LoP
Type of Visit Comp ' e Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: F� Title:
Onsite Representative:c A rZ- o[ l~ [ h
Certified Operator: I '. Y"
Back-up Operator:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = 0 0 f = Longitude: ❑ 0 0 i = {1
Design Current
000"Design Current
Design
Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle
Capacity
Populatiau
to Finish ❑ La er
❑ Dai Cowto
Feeder
❑ Non -La er
❑ Dai Calf
r to Finish p�(
❑ Dai Heifer
to Wean
❑ D Cow
to Feeder
FEI
La ers
❑ Non -Dairy
to Finish
❑ Non -La ers❑
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Beef Feeder
Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow❑ l I
Turke s
❑ Turke P
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
gNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
LJ N ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
LU o ❑ NA
El NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number;(Date of Inspection [ u
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
6
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 36 I' S 20 U PI s a 7 Elf
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): L r Z91 Z O i Y It Z r 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No [],NAElNE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ZOEINA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental th t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12, Crop type(S) st'� Lj /G► u n S . r �
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
o NA ❑ NE
a ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
.,;=', AS'.`,'-Yi - x3.`,._.,. Fxt.t ..t,�s. , . ;.. 3.,..: �aa.4 `.g:� .Hs ir.-
CommenW(refer to questions#)� Explam:any YES answers andlor any recommendations or any otheraco ments�
Userdrawirigssof facilltyto,better,exp5lain situationsi: (useiaddctionatpages as3necessary)i rt u g;
.�.`..+:0,1t,, .'tV' ...,.4-V. �.'s`*.�,. `?7 `r*;.s... .;it's .. .,,•`-_�k�.�:.?. � .t-.� � rA
ReviewerlInspectorName Phone• c��/ �
/ T !�Y/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Gc ' Date: to op,
12128104 Continued

Facilit
y Number: Date of Inspection
Required Recor_ds_& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ W-UP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspectio25NEE]
rather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA El NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? El Yes o ❑ NA El NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? El o ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No Cl NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104

t
V0 (4�
Type of Visit UCom ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: p O Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: 'n � I ap,�6 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: f Title:
Onsite Representative: 4r 4 �r �"'` &tt—
Certified Operator: 4 a I,-, eK-
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Finish
Boars
f`1
Non-L,
Pullets
Other ! I 10ILJ Other
Latitude:
Poults
0
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Region:
Back-up Certification Number:
—11 = f{ Longitude: = 0 [= d
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy^
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood C
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No, ❑ NA. ❑ NE
❑ Yes /No
❑ NA El NE
El Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —3 Date of Inspection L l0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
ldentifier:`�7 Q J S d io S Z p 3-b
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 4" .27 r S A G
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or i0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) f_, r9L/, rA 1L, 5-_ Gc7Y �
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
1c,6mmentsrefer to'V`uestiow# Ez }lain an``YESy°Answer5g`and or an : irecoinmen'di is or ant other c mm';ts(„ .`q)y ;gig v { h s y v yr,4"�.Use drawmgsof;facifity to tterexainsttuattans.use;ionapages asneeessary), �.yyr.w� f� �.-
ReviewerlInspector Name �Y
�� Phone: Zoo
ReviewerlInspector Signature: 614
Date: [ 4 d
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 66 —8 v Date of inspection r ¢ c►
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facilityfail to calibrate waste application equipment as re required b the permit?
PPq Y
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑YesFNo
o NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal`?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addltiorial:C `mmen6 andlo,r Drawn s � " � 's ' o mg I s.'il tia ..,;..�:t.ht Cis
Page 3 of 3 12128104
Page 3 of 3 12128104

(!rDivision of Water Quality
S •(3 -0
Fikiflg-Number
O Division of Sail and Water Conservation
O Other Agency'
Type of Visit Com
ce Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visi Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow up 0 Referral Q Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 fi
Arrival Time: 7—Z Departure Time: County:
Region:
�-
r
Z 7t?
Farm Name:
_d Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: = e = 4 = 41 Longitude: = o
[= i = 16
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other 1.
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
I �, I❑. Non -Layer _ -I
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population.
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ;No
No El NE
❑ YesN NA El
❑ Yes ❑-NA ❑ NE
❑ YesVoN
NE
El Yes NEEl Yes
NE
12128104 Continued

'-I'PacilAy'Number:44 — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes�N0
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: S 16 T15 6 L S
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): I& R 7 f%?i Z P
5. Are there any immediate reats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No _NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed El Yes No ❑ NA ElNE
ZI
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment;No
re otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste_ Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No T1A ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
/
13. Soil type(s)
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0 N NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
N NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ YesFNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
,t.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: qd — '/-� ?'99b
Reviewer/11nspector Signature: `3 A Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: (06 Date of Inspection /
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑ ther Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No NA
[I NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑Yes
No NA❑
NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑Yes
NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
ElYes
Fo A—❑
NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
ElYes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 l . Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

4
Type of Visit m Compliaqpe-il'ispection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation j
Reason for Visit Ofoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other © Denied Access
Fa ' ty Number Date of Visit: Time:
O Not O erational O Below Threshold
ermitted 0 Certified 0 Con+ditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
FarmName:..✓f3..%"................................................................................................. County.:.....................................................................................
Owner Name:
Phone No:
MailingAddress:....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:................ �' j ..'� .. ................................................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 1 " Longitude • ' 44
Diseharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Struct re 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ...... .�........ ........ ....�...a .................. I......................... 1 ....................................................... ......
Freeboard (inches): Z L 1 _
12112103
❑ Yes �-No
r
❑ Yes :11
El Yes o ' .
❑ Yes o
El Yes o
El Yes o
❑ Yes o
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: —z� Date of Inspection U �/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes o
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ElYes o
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes o
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type GO r m k
T
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes , EJ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
.moo
Odor Issues
17.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
.,.,,..s;'r::>�•;t':rita�s;s"�irrt°"t.;�.;a�t=�tr z-.�,..,.art>>.astr•�>;�,:i�rrees¢5>.3.- y.g;r:�r;3:.:ta�..��,..sar <�r,n'Fsr.�.�i<. ..°ms.".'�:-t,�°� ,,��,n t,,i,•.,�r
'Comments'(refer,°to'question`#) p1a�a'any;'YFS aiswers and/or any-'recommendatio�spor any'other comments b
.. ."#..k.'i!3.ia7,i:.J-'+�'S€it=��¢.bra#-�33�n.<uSt!tnr.;i,v;:Y.;.."#,3
Use drarviags offace4ty�tobetter explain s�taat,oas.#(etse,add�hanal�pages as;necessary}.a�4}Y� ❑ gield Copy ❑ Prnal
. T
ReviewerlInspector Name z ajjj,.ule>::u
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Ldit
■ ziiaiw Conanuea

a:4it3t Number: -� Date of Inspection 4�
Required Records & Documents;
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No r
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes o
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes iio
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes td1VO
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes,
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 7No,
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ElYes
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes o
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes .0 0
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes o
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o
❑ Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form [:]Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

FaciEi.ty Number
Division or Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency �,-
Type of Visit (5 Comp 'ance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation � Technical Assistance
Reason for Visi Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival 'rime: I Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: . _r^ tz-14,— 0 __ _ _ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: 7, w` /�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: o ❑ I ❑ Longitude: 0 o ❑ , ❑
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
eederto Finish 0
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ F crow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish o 4
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design . Current
Capacity- Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocket
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

r
Facility'Number: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes �No
NAElNE
Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
�.9g= 5' S
f�2,9 c.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes C No NA ElNE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
S. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [I Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
PJNNoo " NA LINE
;N NA El NE
r❑NA El NE
N NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
00 p n n .a el ra r
5 f+ QS A - -- g-( q vC , yo o0 1:7FreV to
J,9
S4ow 5 3 vv�
r=r4rrJt!^ F�„.sH n �I Yo��r9G Fed -F.�: sly_
Reviewer/inspector Name
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
GtiJ Date: 2
.12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No • NA ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ t20 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections Bather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes N ❑ NA [INE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes `V NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ONo/[:] NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

] Y -A
,.Division of Water Quality �.
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q.Other Agency
Type of Visit 11 Cq fiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: [�'xls Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No: - .
Onsite Representative: / Integrator:
Certified Operator: e el'C.G�. '� �Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: [= o = I =is
Longitude: C
p = , ❑ u
Design Current Design Current Design„ Current:::
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population: Cattle: Capacity.Population;`:
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
i
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer R
Dry Poultry
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cowl
Number of Structures
I
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes kNoNA ❑ NE
ElYes A ❑ NE
❑ Yes FNo
NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number• — D Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o - NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
St ru ture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure Structure 6
Identifier: S 3
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):A 5 Z �� % �j 2 a �/-3 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA El NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre ,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNvXE:1
NA [INE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
l2. Crop type(s)
J
13. Soil type(s) {'1 a r f--d � / (j.?/ JS A'+7v-V
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
KIINo -14A ❑ NE
F0�No
NE
NA ❑ NE
NA ElNE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question#): ,Explain°any YES answers and/oi' any recommendattansoor any'other comments ^4 41,
Use drawings of facility to tictter..explain situations v(use ad+drttona! pagesm:as'necessary).
Reviewer/1nspector Name r Phone:
Reviewer/]nspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 12 8104 Continued

Facility Number: 3 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes "NoNA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rain Inspections eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ElNA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ YesrNo
El NA El NE
25. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El YesEl NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additlonal Comments and/or Drawings:` " F
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit Comp ' ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 1, Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: r6,+12 L & 1, ar✓
Certified Operator: +w✓ �'� G�'^ iJ ��C--
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: ❑ e = i ❑ Longitude: = o = i ❑
Design
Current _ Design Current
�; "' _ �-
i - Design y @urrent
Swine Capacity
Population Wet Poaltry` C�pacity�"Population
Cattlet Capacity Population
❑ can to Finish
❑ Layer
❑
Dairy Cow
❑ n to Feeder
❑ Non -La ei
❑
Daia Calf
Feeder to Finish
'o t(
a �; ❑Dai
;Dry Poal ❑
Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
El
o ❑ Layers
El
Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
Non -Layers
❑
Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults�
IVumtier of Structures:
❑ Other
❑ Other
Discharses & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
❑ Yes ►� 2
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ YesEl
FNo
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
El Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

04
z " ,
Facility Number: —3U
Date of Inspection 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard`?
7 St r cture 1; 'Structure 2 Structure 3 3 a Structure 4
Identifier: s _(
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 1 2 L �jL 3 k 1r-St
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No " "❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
c
12. Crop type(s) � ! r,. ^ a" J4 . 5 + Sr A i� S
13. Soil type(s) Jc��-�0- r�I (L-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
19. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
PO r ,5 1 L4PqVoW I
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
2FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
l�fo
❑ NA
❑ NE
N
❑NA
❑NE
VN
, NA
❑
❑ NE
❑_�(o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
�' 67s
1212RI04
Continued

acillity Number: — 3b Date of inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. . ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �`N�0
NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facilityfail to calibrate waste application equipment as re required b the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Ppq Y
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 9 N�o-
El NA El NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes() No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Adtlitfonitl Comments anchor°•Drawings"'� ", pR� g,�
tom( 7. trer was U- u- (L-lu-o y
Al CA_j D :7C it s a
7prZ�y�<l�n�vc�,
r/o 4nr, J lqlP
Ucca•,�� r2ch-- �z-�� Tos- �.-�.� j
12128104

of Visit Of Compliance Inspection p Operation Review ,f goon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Fillty Number Date of Visit: 1) ime: l i7
a
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
ermitted [/Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ... I..... .. .....�....... �.6........................................................................ County:...................................................................................
Owner Name:
MailingAddress: ......................................................................................
Phone No:
FacilityContact: ........................................................................ Title:...................................................... i ... Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: ."` ri�t�3S......................................,............ Integrator: .h.......... I..o....L..•../..�...►..............
Certified Operator: ..................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 44 Longitude • 6 44
Swine
_;
❑Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish;Ni
❑ Non Layer I I +!i ❑ No airy
} K z F ; ,_ ,',:,, . t . -:;r, ,. a #
r l ❑Other y �- + ! _ !,,
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ F to Feeder
w
TOtBI}BSIII���pRG�jrf"
arrow to Finish
Gilts
❑ Gilts
© tatSSLW
Boars-.= ❑ B
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there, any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0-10
❑ Yes
❑ Yes [f10
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes ; oo
Yes � o
Structure 1 Ste re 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...... ..ti}'�l �`...............................................rp ......................... .7...r................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): c7� 0 o70 Z 3
12112103 - Continued

Facilit7 Number: — Date of Inspection 177 L 9 7-o
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ❑ No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ❑ No
elevation markings?
Waste Armlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type 6 e Ir ,X - J-� S A.-N I , 9 , � J
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [:]No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or Iagoon fail to discharge attor below [ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
L m e.-ir L ►t 04 f; _�: � II✓ u-- Loss / v h' s e-" I a-, c�t e_
I�yQir� n � i o b/� � �� Q/ Cy ! F" ✓CGS {�q �.-�, � ✓.PZ�r_7%�
v�,,,. t� L , -� � r Q v K n � F 1= r � 0 U�9-t'TQ U� S U ICJ �-vi'• �� a` �
Jq ,T n t e, L".V- n � � S4 - r F-jq c e— Lr ry- �-e,- - %z�'7a 2'"- c ,ew e e A cl e 4o
(52 Lt l/ �..�7 S i � u A- �t rTh � � i� � L: y'--.� (/Nq 3' yr � � � r=a v_ � .�y�2r✓'1�,q
L- r- 13/w �C
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 01 2 0
12112103
Continued

I
* 110 Division of it and Water, Gbnservahon �peiation Review f-�4 :94!',
FI i , V d, ,,. 4d (
n of Soil and .Waterl,Conset•vabon, -Compliance Inspection € f , d {. `
f 44r 1VAOn Of Water QeaIityr,,CoimpltanGe Ilnspechon r { t' ¢ x t rt a t �'7 r j4 „
s r F ! r ©Other Agency
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Faci ' umber I Date of Inspection Il �J� .., ..—
Time of inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 13 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated:
r
Farm Name: ....r^.�3..-t.'ralll ........ �!2�.! �` �.... County: i�/Q't/.�.� /?h........q............................
Owner Name: Phone No- 'i ` 2 O
................................................................I.......
r
Facility Contact: ............. ...Title: ..... Phone No:........
FlailingAddress: f.,;.0...gb..x... .........V4............................................................................................................ ... I.......................
r
Onsite Representative;
J�..l.l�... 2...�r..................................................................... Integrator:..'!` r�... S.............,...............................
Certified Operator:..l�� fi .7..../ .w.... � {! Operator Certification Number: ............................ ............... ......................... .
Location of Farm: C'IZ
.............................................................................................. ............................... ........... .............
Latitude 0 4 �• Longitude • 9 49
Design
Current ' Design
Current'
Design Current
Swine Ca acs
•tyPoultry,
Population-."-.-„ . act ,
Ca" ' ty
Population Cattle
Ca acit Po iilation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
-
❑ Fa w to Feeder
❑Other
r
arrow to Finish
'I 4
Total Design Capacity
[]Gilts,
u
f" El Boars
r,
Total SSLW
,.. , .
4 ; Nurnberr.A, Lagoons
}
, x ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area
❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/ Solid Traps
❑ No Liquid Waste
Management System
;
Discharges & Stream Impacks
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge orininated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. Ii' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure i Strucj�re 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Identifier: # 3 G r
Z7 it z % # Z 7
Freeboard (inches): G.� � U / Lei ei! S3 G r � 1�( !r � �....... .......... � � {`
..........................................I............1........
5. Are there any immedi a threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
ElYes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes Ja ""
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
Structure 6
...............................
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

f racility Number_ [06 _3 d Date of lnspec•tion 7 /2
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managcd through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re uired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
19. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
10 yiola�iQtis or dgficie;ndL-9 •*ere h6fed• d(Wing #his;visit: • Y:oh wiil•reeoiye 4q futther
;corres• oxide'& abotrt this .visit_
1:::,-v-14
Reviewer/Inspector Name
❑ Yes
El Yes:Zo_�
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes -�'N0
❑ Yes ima
❑ Yes . To
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ;Z�',
❑ Yes ko�
ElYes OTIo
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes 00
❑ Yes ©'No
ElYes �' 1b o
❑ Yes J Ou
❑ Yes
❑ Yes �"No
❑ Yes o
El" Ye
❑ Yes No
flll, .l L. L.Vlll!![L.l[Ul1L[V l4`l Vl�}NIIJ' VYIL.l�L.VI[[illG11W {< i f„ i. � E A ➢',
1 i i x f 1 f
pages1asrieeessary) 3�� " �R €1 3��� m I i
rar�r�/y �.� SJ�ry..lr vF- t�eyjt�,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: -7 / / 7/,
3/23/99

• •Facility Number: Date oi' Inspection 7 /L
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below_
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the,land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a perm anontltemporary cover'?
Yes CO] No
❑ Yes .?J'No
❑ Yes ;tvO�
❑ Yes 0�
❑ Yes ;1<0
ElYes
La es ❑ No
Additional ommentS ant ,,. Qr raW1pgg
7
3123/99

Division o€Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Divisiow6fSoil and Water Conservation -'Compliance Inspection
©Digrision of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
D Other Agency —.Operation Review° , r,
0.11outine O Contnlaint O Follow-un of D%VO hisoec•tion-104low-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number - Dame of, Irfslorr toa: -, % 1�
Time of lnspudcelin++ "?, 1/ 24 hr.(hh:mm)
[] Permitted E3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified p Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Fa=nt "Jame: ..��'/71..i., rf�i�ei~.f ......... fL: lf1�.F: ...... �' �jC� C:ountv:...................
Owner Name; Phone No:
FacilityContact-.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
MailingAddress:............................................................................................................................................................................................................ .
Onsite Representative: rotor'
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. . Operator Certification rNumber:.........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude" 1 Longitude " '
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
0 Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
I
❑ Dairy
El Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Laver
I
i
JE] Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management Systen,
17isdr:ar,us & Stre:+nr Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'!
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. II'discharge is observed, was the convcyancL rnan-made?
h. If discharge is ohserVcd, slid it reach Water- of the State'? (ff ycs, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon systcm? ([f yes, notify UWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [} No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
«':ante Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm l orage) less than adeclr ate? ❑ Spillway "Z 7�J' it a ` ❑ Yes No
Structure ] Siructtrrc 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure Structu". 6
hrcehnard (inches ): ............� ....
....................... ? ..�.......... _...........I....�...................:�..�............... ............�-
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees• severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage. etc.)
3123199
2 ��-�-c� 5 Cr ev � � l � Lc.•U 4a � 5 �' � r•- �- t,.L)
Continued on brick

Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION
Facility Number
-
Farm Name: a
On -Site Representative: {
Ins pectorlReviewer's Name: (4k
Date of site visit: �
Date of most recent WUP: '2—
FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
�eration is -flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: JU '�ounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
5. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an 1 or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D)D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ili. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART IL 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
�� field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
� F2 Unclear, . illegible, or lack of information/ma
g p
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
mall, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

W
..r
ZN
T
Facility NumberE6��� Date of Inspection 1 JCIU152 "
I - I I -Time of Inspection P 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered [3 Certified D.Applied for Permit CKermitted (,3 Nest Oge Date Last Operated: ..........................
FarmName,-/ 4-q1.'n1.//A ... ......................Z-. ...... —.3 ............................................ County: . . ....... ........ ......................
OwnerName- ............... ............................................................. I... ....... Phone No-t ...... ................
Facility Contact: 'Alk1h .... .ee ......................... Title: .................. I ........
............................:...............................................................................1....... Phone
hone No
: .......r..................... : ......
MailingAddress:..... 7.1.v....... ............. .........1310................*......_............ ..........................
Onsite Representative:�.!..ne'./..... Integrator:.... ..........................................
'q ..... ....................................... 11 .................... Operator Certification Number, .........................................
Certified Operator;. Vel,, 4�� -0—
Location of Farm: /Z_ / So
............... ............................ . ...... " ....... I .......................................... I ............. I ..... I ..................................... I ....... I ............................................................ .................... . ... . .. . . .....
Latitude 0 4 66 Longitude 0 4 41
Wean to Feeder
0 Layer
[]Dairy
Feeder to Finish
Non -Layer
61.n�Nan-Dairy
Farrow toWean
Other 5.
Fa to Feeder PxYK❑
farrow to Finish
a 17 0
I.D69i
Toti gii'Capacity,
... ....... Y. .
Gilts
Boars
..... ........... ..............
"IN IN
El Subsurface Drains Presen:t]10 Lagoon Area
... .........
ID Spray Field Area
10 No Liquid Waste ilanAgement System
❑0
4:
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
0 Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
El Yes 0
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes N
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
X
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
0 Yes :0 1
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
0
El Yes 0
5. Does any part of the Waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
D Yes ;0'/
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
0 Yes
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
El Yes No
7/25/97

-y_2 iIi y Numher:% —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'!
Structures fLagoons,llolding Ponds. Flush fits, et�Q
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Cl Yes 2,No
Cl Yes o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Stru,:ture 5 Structure 6
IdentiFier: rw'C'`.,.30 rAlIZA...Zj' h--L. -z.7. 1. t...........1= !4.._.............................................................. ........
Freeboard. ft 3"6-1 3•v.�. �l• s �.v•1"' 3,s ;� o/ ..
!l (:.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ElYes o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'? ❑ Yes No
Waste A-pplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop typeY�ir,..... y!,5'Y,r9..................................................................................................................................................��5
16. Do the receiving crops diffewith those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? Cl Yes oo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes N
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative." ❑ Yes
22. Does record keeping need improvement? El Yes N
For Certified
" or Permitted Facilities Only,
.................................. .
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes N
24. WerXaadditional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? El Yes.. o
25. re any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'? ❑ Yes No
No.violations or derfeiencies. were- noted during this. visit. Youmill receive no further
correspondence a out this'.visit'.
Camments.(refer to question #) Explain any VES answers andlor nny recon mendattons yr any other comments.
s : r�� r
Use drawings of facility to better explain srivatii7ns {ttse additional pages as necEssaty)
•
�0 As; VV% O k 4- 6" rod n al-j b w ,
t h t w S ..� o-1 r �� s U44- ou G[ h, '14 a-n. C,4
0 i= G C GM - I 1.1 vim- A G w K- C, cvle . yv v e r d b s
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
ea`
Date: : • /(7

aYu'a�ii.�{t,YiC�^!'4�"'!�7�MfF'wW%.E¢''�yOVY�"x'��...w�,�x,M'Rh�"4�'�'x"gE"hwvtc�^� .,, r..�., «��v.c �•_ . ,. .mm:,.,, i7�, Y ",�„ y' v'+'�r '+e r c�-eu.
-71 ---.1 W-: ,". _ ..c::-,A•.m?.� .oau:.: -;::4' ; i Ste' ..1-;c.-Ti: s�A
rCMS WC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
❑ DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine O Complaint O Follow -tip of [)WQ inspt!cti4.►n O Follow-up of DSWC revie►v 0i091kgR RALEIGH REGIONAL 0I- GL
" Date of Inspection
E:F:aC�ilifyNt�imher 7j0
Time of Inspection Do 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin fraction ot'hours
Farm Status: ❑ egistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex.1-25 for I hr 15 rnin)) Spent on Review
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:......,
Farm Name: ... .Gr�o � is Foot) 0
.................�,.,..........................................................:
Owner Name:...,.. L.f..r���,�......?.. v�' a.... �,.1 .1r-�,..
Facility Contact: Rs?., t.........}...; .......�... fitlf
Marling Address: ...... P:Q.....,Pr!X...... ......... G�. .1 ......U.G.:.,.......
Onsite Representative:...%f... ....,.... �..� ...........:...........L.,........
............... I ........ ..
Certified Operator,...........,V1 �/ 1 "7 C P.? 1�
.......................... ...........................................................
l:,ncation of Farm:
..............................................``.........,.,......,.........,.........................................
County:....l��9tt �.w.� .�!. Z........................................
Phone No: * - � -3� -Z) 0 9
....... Phone
. 3.5..9........................................................... .....................,....
Integrator. :........0 _ ./- rrof 1.5......rau� ............................
GG
Operator Certification Number:....................... ................
Ak
................... ....................... ...I .................. ......,.,........................ ............,............................... ..........,,................. ,..................... ........ .............................. ......,.............................
N 1 dA
.. ..h..2 ..�' .......C.. 5 :
a:F ................................... F
I..atitude �• �� �« I.ougitude
Type of Operation Design`:` Current''Design Current Destgn Current '
Swme Pr . y ' Capacity. Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacttv... Population,
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
l.{�'Farrow to Finish
j I oav
g
❑ Other
Subsurface Drains Present JJU Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. Ifdisch,-tr-e is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
cf. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the; waters of the State�other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system' (othenthan lagooiis/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement'
4/30/97
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes ❑'No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
UNo
❑ Yes
Rl o
❑ Yes
LJ No
.ti
Continued on back`

. a» �. � - .. ua �....-.••+w�.:;�;.. ,- ce�R.gw*^''ff�K:"'Yr..�r` -�,Y,.,.., f.rc,�yy."�7'rr'^vw�'a'U'�*4rw'4'Ts+ra�.•'j,� .. ... .- ,:i �� .,-� �,.+tir�.^vr �..w�kaW'„s-,wr.•-p.,�„wF'u�,�T„�c..M.,, ., - .
•TFacil;ty Number:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or 1joldinj! Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Pr Yr..,ar 5e-rU-ac.ry
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Z . 7 S, �
...................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes Ei No
❑ Yes B-No
❑ Yes LT i o
❑ Yes ErKo
Structure 5 Structure 6
.... ............ ..-.......... ............ ................................
❑ Yes O,No
❑ Yes "Io
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement`?
0 Yes
0 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
w
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
L5 No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
Ly NO
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Croptype Coc �� eA 6R.r ti c�c, r�r uss .. ?.rY,.ti��.... f.Cz'n..............
Yp.......................................................... ...................... .......
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
[9-No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[ "No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
0<0 r
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
MIN
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
B No
21.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
(j3No
For Certified Facilities Oni
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Cl Yes
[9'<o
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes [5'No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes 93 No
Reviewer/Inspector Name` p�f€,;
w� ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: j1 Date: Q — r 2 j
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessinetrt Unit 4/30/97
s

J
yet DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
F x [] DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site InspectionUg
s
`.. .'�"` �a�,. �r ,.�-��� ��...: , �„��"':a'"`-,-'�':.�, �,. -.-,.sr.�t, a�'�,.:k �' �k�.: �.";'3^t�•`, ,�.33s>-�''°. �; �.`. ,,'�.'; �4. s:� � f�,;::'r�z
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection I ,'':_I
Facility Number [ " .� _""
Ting of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: [3 Registered ❑ Applied for Permit lex-J.2: for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ................................................................................................................................................
Farm Name: ilt,! -t C?.5......
.. ........... ........... County: .....................................................................................
..5.. 75. 7 -_
Owner Name: ^L 4 ,l,.d'......J....�.................I............................ Phone No: .
FacilitFContact: .............................................................................. Title:.,...............,.,......,..................................... Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ...................................... .................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:. /1..............................................................................
,�1 111........��:'.�E../..p ...1,1� L.1.�� �[1...�:.......... integrator:........
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 41 Longitude • k :&
f Type of Operation Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine:: -Capacity':. Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle. -�"Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Q
❑ Other
Number of Lagoons/ Holding Ponds {] Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
C:enei•af
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'.' ❑ Yes No
I)ischar,;e originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If di,,char,e is observed, was the conveyance n]an-made'? ❑ Yes �No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'! Nf yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [/No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estttnated flow in gal/nun:
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (If ye , notify DWQ) El Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
I. Were there tiny adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes O No
J. Does tiny part of the waste mana,ement system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
muinicnance/in�provement`?
C

1,FacilitNumber:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes [YNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 0 No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes [ No
Structures tllayouns and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [ No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I S ct�re 2 Stnicttue 3 _Strums 4 Structure 5 ,Struu ure 6
...... ..........................�....--......................... :..... ......................�.. ............................................................_.... .................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 91�0
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes .0-No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? dYes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes fNo
Waste A lication !
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 6 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ,r? l�r,n4(,oz. -../! $....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes VI -No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? P Yes I❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes [ONO
21. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes � No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes [�o
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? El Yes ``[� No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No

,0 .
�14
Facility Number Date of Visit: 2 Time:
Not O erational Below Threshold
Permitted E3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
i
Farm Name: Ty County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 0 0« Longitude 00 �.J6 14
Design Current Design Current Design . Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JEI Non -Layer I Non -Dairy I
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars i Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Hald€ng;PondslaSoltdTraps� : ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gailmin?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I 7Zt7ture 2 Structure 3 �0 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier; i►
Freeboard (inches): t 1 ;1� 4, 4
05103101
❑ Yes 1�No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
El Yes ao
El Ye No
Structure G
Continued

13
y
Facility Number:
Date of Inspection 72
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type At- r»l t,.( q , rM 17 r .Q- i - s
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
19. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
J'
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ;No
ElYes 'z" o
❑ Yes C��<
❑ Yes io
o
El Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
El Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
l� ` o
F0oo
L1No
N
N
PNo
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
C mmetits ('refer to question #): Eieplain any YESkaniw/ers,and/or any r`eco n e "dations or a y other comentss,
, C-13�•.�
C . � ,�jJ..'l..g.X",� _.A1
Us 'drawings�of'facility to;better eacplatn situations. (use additionM Gages as necessary} i., ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes '
.. -� ...
*' Reviewer/Inspector Name
Cq—
ReviewerAnspector Signature: Date: 7
05103101 Continued

cility Number Date of Visit: L� Time:z�
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 0 Cond�iytionallly Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: j +��''� / ) 0 County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: I /
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 4 " Longitude a 4 =ff
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder I JE3 Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer 1E1 Non -Dal
....... . ...
❑ Farrow to Wean
[I❑ Other ow to Feeder _ _
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑Gilts �
Total SSLW
❑ Boars
Numher of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
� u.
Holding Ponds I;Soltd.Traps " ❑ No Liquid Waste Mgement S stem.
10 $: <:n. >.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?? ❑ Spillway
Stru ti-i'refl Struclure"L StructA St cture 4
Identifier: S
Freeboard (inches): .7V,
05103101 `1 L i
Structure 5
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VO,/
❑ Yes
❑ Yes a
El Yes o
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: 6 6 — j Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste _Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type 4'_�'M-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with tho a designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
RRe uired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Cl Yes No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes -- No
❑ Yes Ld'No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes rNNo
40
El Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 01N'1;/�
❑ Yes Vl��/
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 2
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes V�o
ElYes❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
NA
Comments (refer,to questions#). Explain any YES answers and/or<any recommendattonssor any.other cotnments
Use drawings of facility to. better,expia€n s€tuati no s (useadditionahpages aynecSsry) ❑ Field❑ Final Notesr�
..Copy
Reviewer/InspectorName . ; "
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: j
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: Date of inspection �11J
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ET No
❑ Yes 4 <No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes /0'
❑ Yes <No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
05103101

to Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DW2 ins ection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
F ity Number Date of Inspection Zrrrr/
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified [] Registered [3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
h r, o /c rr 3
FarmName: ..'...1................................:5......'�rf-...�..1.....?.......... County:............................................-.........-.........-......-.-...........
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ..17L!'?!I �l l/t...... .. Title: Phone No: ..........................................
MailingAddress:..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ....-.....................
Onsite Representative: .... 12. ........................ �. ............ f.............................................. Integrator:.. . ....I..H h e /..`............................................
Certified Operator:,,-„f,�'?� `,,,,;v�.•`C Pew .......................................... Operator Certification Number:.........................................,
Location of Farm:
.--- --- .---.............. ... ...
Latitude ='=1 =11 Longitude =• =` =11
De gn$' 'Current
Design Current. �!-„ �r „ : #Design %1� 'I Trent T.
Ca""aci
Po Poultry
Ca acity,.,.Po` eilatton,' Cattle �, Rci
>siation .
„ .,?„Ca ;`Po'ulation,�,A
-,
`❑ Layer
�< ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy,
;
_.. �,. <_
,x;. e.ii J�91E-
❑ Other
�� d
Design Capacxty`E;,
yTotal
,--------------
'
§ Total SSLW',
t� a z
,,N
Mk �
-
� j , ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
3 F g raps ?
H' T
1
oldin Ponds, Sol d;�
' ❑ No
Liquid Waste Management System '„i,l
3
„', .:
! -; y'
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ F to Feeder
arrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (Il' yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes .2
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the Stale other than from a discharge? ❑Yes
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes!No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ® .� �f . ff �gS qqr I S
Freeboard (inches): ....�......1.2i .............Z,S f ....I.. + .../'I.....�z...rl..........................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures obsery d? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Ye No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — 6 1 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes eNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes�to
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes /No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type nEYA" 41 --f2t1- -- -- - — 1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there"a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
I7.• Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20-- Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time,of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility ire a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Wero46y additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�'�iQ Yiol�>�iq>ris;oi• dtfjcj6nd0 fti:ift #bis:visit: • Y;op wi11•x000iye lid ir64 r
6resporideh& athis visit. .................................. .
❑Yes !�
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes :No
N
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ;<O��
❑ Yes no
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Rio
Yes 01N
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes W "
❑ Yes No
f

Facility Number: -- �Z late of Inspection
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Ofes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes dNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e..residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes o
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? es ❑ No
+I

(Type of Visit 0 Compgnce Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 6 Routine O Complaint. Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other 1 ❑ Denied Access
Number Date of Visit:
ermitted 13 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 2© Registered
FarmName:�J, ji%� .......4` �� .`�.......-7 .............................................. Q
OwnerName: ................................................../...................... ..................
Facility Contact: l Yl/9, ....... il....61LrP1..!::E... Title:
Mailing Address:
OnsiteRepresentative: ...........................................................................................................
Certified Operator:,,,,,,
. �........ �/.. �"..:. C�4.............................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design , Curr
,`d;Sivine �. Ca aci ` Po ulr
;a ❑ Wean to Feeder
s--;; ❑ Feeder to Finish
Farm to Wean
ow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish h"
Boars
U Time:
Not Operational O Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold : .........................
County: ... tQ.sl..l!�J Yt�.. .
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:...�r r.% t)_�!.• .......................................
Operator Certification Number:.... ......................................
Latitude 0 A " Longitude 0 A Ad
Design Current e' Design Current;
Poultry ; :. Ca ace . Po ula6on Cattle „Capaciii, Po ulatio'
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total !6iS19ii Capacity
>., I Number of Lagb6ns ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area . ❑Spray Feld Area E
3, Holding Ponds / s': djTraps, ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Lnpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flaw in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freehraplus storm storyetless than adj te? ❑ SpillwT b
Structure I true ure 2 Struc &e 3 Stru ure 4 Structure 5
Identifier. 2. t....................................
Freeboard (inches):
5/00
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Ja ""
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑Y,K [:]No
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Aanlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type F'�avAn I_ j fi
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
es ❑ No
. 0
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes <No
❑ Yes 5d'' _
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in (he Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes o/
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yesro
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
Reuuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes _ oo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes 0
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? /
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
4 YiAi;tKtRs •or. 00f1clencies •r''Nr )i0 ed• 00.log tit;s'vpspt; • yoo ."J •t�eeeiye ft 0o fuf . .
cori-esaoridenee: aN if this visit: :...........::::................... .
,: r3 ., E, f,_ � 3 .r.; .� , _.
Jse drawiroigs of facility to' fitter.explpin sit .a , onii' (use,,adsLti©naI pages as necessa y)' E f'ti ;i'�rf1.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00

Facility Number: -3 QDate of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
4
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o '
❑ Yes
5/00

` 3)l3
�[3DIXISiofl of Soil and Water Conservation [] Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
A.�x �.• 4 � $ie r T ,j« ,',�.',, ° to t _ � S �+�i—,�za '+� � „�,
10r
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up (if I)wQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Othei
Date of Inspection
Facility Number � � �
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered [3 Certified © Applied for Permit permitted Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: C�Jrrd �5 f'p 2h--Z. ..Z'��..Z./ � �........ County:.ler................................
Owner Name• � >�/�F• ti � �' r��n.L.�J........ ....:. o Y..-.�:JIV-..z:1.a.............
:.:................................. Phone No:
Facility Contact: ?..V .'..1:AI..e:......................... ................. Title:.P. !Atr... ?jr.R-It........... Phone No: ............. ........................ I.............
Mailing Address .p. .../.. ..el.�?.,.. ✓.. f ............2" }................ I .............................. I....... ....... I..................
Onsite Representative:. ✓ J . L!`l. . Q ......... i............................................. Integra tor:.C/.`�.t'!.',1.A. .
1 ✓, «aN
Certified Operatorzk'`�..A .�........................................... Operator Certification fication Number
..1 ...............
Location of Farm:
LatitudeLongitude--
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the'waters of the State other than from a discharge?
�5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes Ql o
❑ Yes 5o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Cl Yes
❑ Yes
Continued

- Ff;ciltCy Numher:
.f
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures (Lagoons,tiolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
• Structure 1
Structure 2
Structure 3
Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:/11'It~..........
..Y.JL!"..,..F...�}........��`.j
. ............................................. ......
Freeboard (tr>:......�.9.i�.......1........�y
��Scc .
.... v ,�
Prritti J
...
:y'(�i "
�.rQ-c,.
...
..v.'....... 1.z../..............................................
�i', �J�c
Structure 6
10. is seepagdobserved from any of the structures? ❑ Yes
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type �?�rt'.�!^'".C.. .�.^.....t.!.r.......................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
00. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25: Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
0 No.violations or deficiencies were -noted -during this visit.• .You.will receive no further
coeresOiidenO About this:visit:-
❑ Yes
N
No
No
Yes 0
❑ Yes No
......................................
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
O
No
0<0-
No
1 o
''o
es ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes E N�o
❑ Yes 01 o
Comments{refer to;question #) 'Explatn�any,7r'ES answers andlor anv recot mendattons oir any other comments:
Use drawtn�s of fuciltty t0 better explairti situatiiins (use addtitonal pages as,necessairy}YQ
q
�e.c� 1 �� •� ed-
e ►- at of 94aj Gvl I4-ow- uF�-�,r G.
` 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,/'Z,[�. �py,•(� Date:

14
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
[DaHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 16, 1997
Mr. Rudy Grammer
P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject:Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-30
Carroll's Farm 29
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
On July 8, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility.
This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to determine
compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that your animal operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
y q pp _ management
that you are required to have an approved animal waste
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely
J�rrett
Y
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC --- RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, * FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Catalina 27609 NIPF C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

v �Uunj amt y ronow-up of V vvy inspection V Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection E= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: egistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑l Not Operational Date Last Operated: ......
q_................._....... _................................ _......................... __............. _........ __.... _.................
Farm Name: t�.CLI n/...! ......r// !!.. ..-Z_(F....................... County: %.i�! / '�f/....._q.............__..........
Land Owner Name:.ZL .._ . / .C�l.�................................................................ Phone No%.& Y..-5-3 V — Z( Q
n% /......................................................
Facility Conctact:....•........... Title: ............................ Phone No:...Sl ...........................................
Mailing Address:.......!Z..'6..p._.y... La.k.:p........ f.. .� ...._.... !% .....- .. -7 a
1.......... ........................./..................................................
Onsite Representative: rt �! .�'1.....5-6' ev........... ........................ _................. Integrator:. r................0_�/- .S
.........................................................,
Certified Operator: ..rJ_(!%!,?,,,,� fyrl„
Location of Farm: :'-, / ? ) )
Latitude =*=1=«
General
Operator Certification Number:
Longitude =• =' =11
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes _No
❑ Yes ?JNoNoo
❑ Yes a
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes d""No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

FacjTk& Number:. .. .... — ...Q....
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes D, o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes o
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes IQ No
Struclures
(Lagoons and/or Holdine Ponds)
less
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) than adequate?
❑ Yes
ld'No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
1f:. S... �.. �. � /...
.... _ ................I ... ............................ ..........-...............
.........................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
! No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
EKO
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
J� 0_
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
OYes
❑ No
Wa to Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
El Yes
ld'No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ......t.cif? t S .!9I ................................................................................................................... ... .........
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
J' io
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ONo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
0 No
21.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
. . 1Vo
For
CerIifed Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name r N EM., l: n z.I .......
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �j,(� Date: -% — -�` J ! - _
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

^� State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
IDEF.HMF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 16, 1997
Mr. Rudy Grammer
P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject:Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66--31
Carroll's Farm 28
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
On July 8, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility.
This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to determine
compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that your animal operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC --- RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, ' FAX [phone]
Raleigh, Notch Carolina 27609 N%q
4FCAn Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number
Farm Status: egfstered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:../ r!%1..1s ...... rG...?-......7..7IIFI ..Tl.....
Land Owner Name:...41`l/l t .k / �f........................_.......................
Facility Conctact:..��f��7!., ..... si q ,- /[ ............ Title:
Mailing Address:
County:`2.......,q......................
Phone No: ..... (.....................
Phone No:........ 5 e- .......................
U
OnsiteRepresentative: 4..Q!�, JCrd `�....» Integrator:.,���15
nn// » ...... »..........». »................_.»................»....... »................»..... ................... _.
Certified Operator:.... ry[.(/�Ih,..... A t� .......... Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm: / t'
........................................................................................................................................................................ 4
............................................................... ....
Latitude =•='=" Longitude �• .
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
❑ Other
Present
Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Field Area
❑ Yes 0'No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes 015o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes �0<0
❑ Yes XJNo
Continued on back

Farjity Number:... Z.J
-'b. Is,facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
ture5 (Uggons andjor Ifolding Eonds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
............ .... ........( ..... ......... _.................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes E Noo
❑ Yes 1J'No
❑ Yes Ld No
❑ Yes No
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of W/1MPP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type C....t`I c.F...............................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMp?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
2I. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22, Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24, Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes � o
es ❑ Now
ElYes B
O'Ves ❑ No
❑ Yes f No
❑ Yes 0� Now�
El Y0 es No
❑ Yes �o
El Yes 1�"No
❑ Yes �10
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers ' and/6r'any recommendations o'tany other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations: {use additionai pages as necessary) t£
6 4 4/c S. jJc •.. D f� % G H+� �9�-r�7� - 4
Reviewerllnspectur Name
xmmmm�mmm
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ! l .C� �i�
Date:
q
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt; Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
1Dr-=HNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 16, 1997
Mr. Rudy Grammer
P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject:Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-33
Carroll's Farm 27
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
On July 8, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility.
This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to determine
compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that your animal operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret-0'Keefe, DSWC --- RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NiCw C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycied/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number
Date of Inspection i
Time of Inspection D 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status:
egPermitex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) ))
istered ❑ Applied for Spent on Review d ❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and nraress:no�
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ... .:..4r.✓_.✓...//. J � �- �. Z
............. /.........................................._.....__......._......
Land Owner Name:..t�. /Cl... v�(S_..............__......__......._................_....._........
Facility Conctact:... �!:�! —j.............. _... Title:.._ ...............
Mailing Address: ... Q.'...L,...1 Q . j �e .x. ! �
County: %QL lri�LY'.. qq
2.. ......................_...............
Phone No:... .�.�� .. t(—_ u 0
z3�
Onsite Representativewl.nda gm ee-
....................................................................................... Integrator: ...... 4-P.t.:d 9�
Phone No:...._ S�%!''.........................................
Certified Operator: ... 661. ,✓1,,,, n„_P
Location of Farm: �� 7 )
Latitude =-=,="
General
Operator Certification Number:
Longitude 00 =• =[{
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ❑'No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes gNo
❑ YesNo
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes//
❑ Yes �d
❑ Yes CJ /No
Continued on back

a Facility Number:., t�?!(P,..._—'_U.....
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structfures-CLag,Qous and/or Holding Pond)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft):. Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11'. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes 0<0
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Wa5te Applicatiop
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop h'Pe ....��..� .............................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AW1V1 V
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
for —Certified Fagilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
se di wings of facility to bettei
�aJ1 uy+ h �T�-( �►-+
rant' YES` answers'' and/or ar
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
LSO
❑ Yes
0"No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
n No
[' 1h O
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: `
cc: Division of Water Quality, Wafer Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

f� •
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh, Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 16, 1997
Mr. Rudy Grammer
P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject:Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-32
Carroll's Farm 30
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
On July 8, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted'a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility.
This inspection is. part of the Division's efforts to determine
compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that your animal operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that -the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this -inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC---RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, ft FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%C. An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 M% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
s'

Routine
of
Facility Number Date of Inspection
JTime of Inspection D ti 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status:4ertified
feered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑//11Not Operational Date Last Operated: ........................................................................................................ _...........................................
FormName: ..uf`j.......... ..../........./Zs.. .......... ..... ..✓�.._.................................. County:dQp/...... ................................
Land Owner Namepp.....1l//!YY.Y...l.....15................................................................. Phone No:.._...fd.t!......
.. ... y.._'...2.�a .............
Facility Conctact:..(t..!..�1 ............... Title:................................................ Phone NO: .... _.................................
Mailing Address:.../...._ ....���..!�.. ... 2_l..d..........C.n✓ ........`/ Z-3_ 0
w l
............................................................................................ Integrator:
Onsite Representative:rator: YI .✓...�._S
Certified Operator: hj _(..'.`......... .. t'. ............................................................ Operator Certification Number: .............................. _..........
Location of Farm: S'
Latitude =• =' 0" Longitude =• =' =11
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes N�o
❑ Yes ENo
❑ Yes B No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes (�
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

I%aciNty Number:.. —...... -
• 6. Ys facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft):. Structure I Structure Structure 3
....I.:?... .......... 0.....
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes l�d'N�o
ElYes L<No
❑ Yes
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste -Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess
�of� WM�P, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.....................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A P)?
W0 P/sV7401
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Fagilities Only.
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
es ❑ No
❑ Yes 0090
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
,❑Noo
.,,
i,, 5-o—
❑ Yes
t%f Now
❑ Yes
f��'No
❑ Yes
Ergo"
❑ YesNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,:lfa,! #
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4l' 7 Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, LV!MAI
Health and Natural Resources &6ja
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Governor
ry p E H N IR
Jonathan B. Howes, 5ecretaefia
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 21, 1995
Mr. Rudy Grammer
Smithfield Carrolls
P. 0. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Swine Operations
Facility Numbers: 11, 27, 29, 30, 35, 37,
and 39.
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
on July 11, 12, and 15, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the
Raleigh Regional Office conducted compliance inspections of the
aforementioned animal facilities. These inspections are part of the
Division's efforts to determine potential problems associated with
liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visits determined that wastewater from these
facilities was not discharging to the surface waters of the state.
In addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
were observed at these facilities. As a result, these facilities
were found to be in compliance at the time of their inspection.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved 'animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 10L Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Rudy Grammer
Smithfield Carrolls
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspections
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely, _
Jud�E. ett
n� Water Qual y Supervisor
/as
H:\animdn
cc: Northampton County Health Department
,Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Pat Hooper -Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
.Water Conservation

r_
7i,'L-14-1995 15=26 FROM DE[,l WATER OUaL I TY SECTION TO
RRO P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate Aaendor
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 9-1 v , 1995
Time: //
Farm Name/Owner
Mailing Address: 0
County:.. 1v0 rj 11 A Pv4Y L�,n.,.,—
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative:
Physical Addsess/Locadon: 5'e I Zv I
Phone:
Type of Operation: Swine /' Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: /0a D_ 50 u1 Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes. or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm euenc
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: �/t. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes 00 Was any erosion observed? Yes No
Is adequate land available for spray? or No Is the cover crop adequate? Ees r No
Crop(s) being utilized: 6If
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Q or No
100 Feeffrom Wells? 0 or No
^C animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or'&
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o
'; animal waste discharged into waters of the state by xnan-made ditch, flushing system, or other
yir^i:a_r man-made devices? Yes o4o If Y:s, Please Explain.
.k,cs tic facility ivaintain adequate waste MArtagernent records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes No
Additional Comments:
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
6�A_ (rrv�
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

��^r{J�"t+�s`�'3�^'S,:�$FIiL?�tr�ojv>.^�".',:t.r`wtt:t7'r�11-iii«a'.+'r'lw°iri'iw',�!'i""nF�.w:�,,,�.,a�a,yn, , r�TW�':a•�e� .�,y.,�.r� «r-•,.... -. .. �x
:[SWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
1 3 DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
IGIRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC: reviewTI
Facility Number 30
Farm Status: [] Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
ElC ertified ❑ Permitted
Dille of Inspection
Time of tnspection 3 : 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
'total Time (in fractifni'iif hours
(ex:l.2; for I hr I_+ min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (,includes travel and processing)
Not O erationall Date Last Operrated:..................................... ...............
...........................................
.......................
Farm Ni#me:..... s�...L..�a.�� �....i �'. .... 2 ! Cnunty:.....,/VRf..�.�t��,1404.0t".....................................
Owner Name• Y Y...d 5....... l�w�� � .�-�,. Phone No. � 71,:....5 .3��L' ? . .9.........................
r,
Facilio Contact: ..,..',:?.4c..�.l�........ ............. 'ritie:......................................................... Phone No
Mailing Address:...iC fl.W.......w,� G. 7 3 S 90.........................................:.................................................
Onsite Representative:...... .. .l..P........... .................. Integrator, .... clf!�r �S
..............................................
Certified Operator: .................................. ........................... '..............,.,. Operator Certification Number :�.,!�.1. f ��41.................
Y
Location of Farm.
�� !�?.'. �.5'...... /1!• l,7`.. �. a' ? ... ................... ......................................
Latitude �•�� �cc Longitude
Type of Operation Currents Design f Current Uestgn Current
.., ,.
5wtne Capacity ..Pppulation, Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity,: Populafio
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
E],F'arrow to Finish
I looD
qg p
❑ Other
! Number of Lagoons / Holdrng'Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Getaerul
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes ❑'l�o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �Y<o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. It•discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system" (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [U No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of tfie State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes O-N
5. Does any pan of the waste management system (other than ]moons/holding ponds) require ❑Yes UNo
maintenance/improvement?
4/3U/97 Continued on balk

.� .-v- �.�n c. : e�. -,... ,. -+ `r c.`i :;,j' cp�,s�rw�^wy"iv s;'. cr.....cyr-.:e7•H`�ttiv�;+q�{n^�4r�1`ti'�^ "Wr`+,-!T7.. -., of.:-rpP­syiy,,v,'If'­­­-
I
7,acilittyNumber: It —
• 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes &NO
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes U-N-0
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes [9-T o
Structures (Layoons and/or11olding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (f eeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �°
V,vw ,%/ Seea,.�c.n��
Freehoard (ft): Structuref(I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
......................................... �..... 7...........................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
C
15. Crop type ............ "� ..,. & J. 4.:{ ..`......... ^'!^�.. ; 14.1.E .�........ .....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
q
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
Reviewer/Inspector Name
❑ Yes (9-No
❑ Yes ©-No
Cl Yes U-N-0
■�M
❑ Yes 0-Ko
❑ Yes []-Isla
❑ Yes
®'No
❑ Yes
9-No
❑ Yes
P<O
0 Yes
EI-No
❑ Yes P-Nb
❑ Yes ,ETr o
❑ Yes LNo
EI
❑ Yes t� 1Vo
f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: f -fI - � )
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Urait 4/30/97

R
JUL 07 ' 95 15: 41
943 P02
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH A NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF EWIRONMENTAL MANAGENWr
Fayetteville Regional office
Animal Operation Comnliance Inspection Form _
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
SECTION i
Animal Operation Type:
horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or sheep
SECTION Ii
I. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system)]
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation REGISTRATION?
3. A -re animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4. Does this facility have a CERTIFIED ANIMAL
MASTS MANAGF1EE T PLAN?
5. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
b_ Does this facility sheet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
CAN
13ft s'.J aj' L q
Y I N f COMMI?V'!'S
I/

� 13 UL a? ' 95 15: 42
943 P03
SECTION III
Field Site Management
1. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map Blue Line Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USG5 Map
Blue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
A. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
CERTIFICATION_ PLAN?
5. is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?
6. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
(BMP) of the approved CERTIFICATION?
7. noes animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard? How much? (Approximately )
8. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
SECTION IV
Comments

..��
.TUL--14--1995 15 : 2b FROI'i DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION
TO
`�-3
RRO P • 02
Site Requires immediate Anenjor.-
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7 - / Z 1995
Time: ,L `Lei s
Farm Name/Owner: S'M.�?�/� I` f .l / cl Gg`q� 07 ..
Mailing Address: �' �' 9 0 )r_ 1 z- f 0
County: o rl
Integrator Phone: o 4/- r%- Z/ o
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address!Location: 2 D
Type of Operation_ Swine. Poultry — Cattle
Design Capacity: &00 �w S _ Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Cetvfication Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: -______Feet
Circle Yes. or No
.Does the Animal Waste, Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approxirna[ely l Foot t Tinches) 'e r No Actual Freeboard: Y__'t. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes QPWas any erosion observed?(:Oor No
Is adequate land available for spray? Gor No Is the cover crop adequate? Vi or No
Crop(s) being utilized: rK+ 10 t9AJH ivc-'
Does the facility meet SCS nainitnum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? j�or No
100 Feet from Wells? Ye or No
animal waste stockpiled. within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or,150
x mai waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of. a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or�io
animal waste discharged into waters of the state! by tnan-made ditch, flushing sys[etn, or other
,imilas rnan-made [devices? Yes c r- y if Yws; Please- Explain,
' )a )cs the facility tnaintain adequate waste managerncnt records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on Specific acreage with cover crop)'? � e or No
Additional Comments: C'Nl d & & o a-r Lit w 1 &
-fo t-�0 AwAee _ Dw, S 19 F�e I,,, d e-�2,,- ^, rnr
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.O2

..,�u�il�i�y„j�'r`��ritk-x�:'1���r:�i�"�S�`_SJ..4`Frk%L"�'^J�Y+�:.sil+ti�'�"i'�r� "r41iY'Y.'.+`�. Vn'�"'rr�a+.{"i 'ifl4-- '6t*..r w•:r-• -M. ..-ry..... �^• -r .i s .. 9_^ �� •-.�. ,.. __�_,1
n
. h:Ya".,S. i•Y,.a:ni�'.�$'y`d� .:,..F: "#...w3" a..>�'o.Y>;: .-3'grY. .o:-'\- a...i.:.xah :..i -:: y.<:� -:; r...-r �...w 3. ":•:%'ha.
Ej'&S' WC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
❑ DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
10'Rouine 0 I ollow-up of DSAVC; review O Uther j
Date of insl �tirtn + _
Facilitv Number 30 1
Time of Ins eR tinn �-24 he, ,(hh:mm)
!� Total Tint (iri frucl�)t of hotirs
Farm Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 t'ct ii� tS #iif�3),`�pFni-on Review'
r
'Certified [[ Permitted or Iuspec on (' tcfutics travel at} ro� cssitig)
RAI,,G,
Not Operational Date LastOperated: ........................... RfGlQ�
Farm Name: ....�r�..f^.t".�.�.I...St.....��.�.�.�,....� z--7 Coutats•:..,�!.�,��n�f.f^r.�......dh................I...............
Owner Name; i.. .......... Phone No ..,., � I .
Facility Contact: .......Rv.Aa ....... ....... Title: ................................................................ Phone
Mailingaddress:...... ..[. .. .l v r / ... 2 33.50.............................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: ..................)) ,�} Integrator* .^�C?,........�...........................
p U ............................... .........7f,Q............... g Carr ��l n Cl
Certified Operator: M G ! r`! 'i (� P ........... Operator Certification Number:...... �. ...I I?,
p 1............................. /...! . �............. /!l. ........... p ............
Location of Farm:
................................
.n�..;.. ......... ✓:....�f....... �.... t ...n................. .................
0 t� .y
L,atitudc • � � Longitude •
Type of Operation:, Design Current llesign Current ° Design Current
Swine .> Capacity; Population Poultry „ Capacity Population Caftle , Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
10-farrow to Finish
a o U
A0
❑ Other
Number of Lagoons I Holding ;Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Gene_rat I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes B<O
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes EKo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. Ifdischarw-e is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, [lid it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If dischvge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d, hoes discharge bypass a lagoon systenf? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
m a i n to pan ce/imp rove me nt?
4/30/97
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ET —No
❑ Yes D-<o
❑ Yes 93"No
Continued on hack

... -r ,-a ... .., ,.,. .,.i•n--,.•- -•nt. "n,+u W4ri'#�'.u-iM,^.'fr �,...•.,5,. _n,.k., k� -4wryarw-.a.k,� , x}.r,-r ,. .r.
.,.-tire- rr 7vt;'.,vi.
" Facility Number: --
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
V2<o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge`?
❑ Yes
UKo
& Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed`?
❑ Yes
®•No
Structures (Lagoons and/or I'-lolding fonds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
IId'No
Freeboard (ft): Sipructurerl Structure. ? Structure 3 . Structure 4
Structure 7
Structure 6
3.0 S;7
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
[}-Mc).
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
EjNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes EJ-No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes QjNo
Waste App lication
14. is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes El"No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) E'
15, Crop type .... .` .. `....... C �e �..f,'- .`' c) rt....... ..:.......................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ElYes a<o_
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities QnI
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
Reviewer/Inspector Name
❑ Yes
EI'No
❑ Yes
a<o
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
[9-90
❑ Yes
4 0
❑ Yes M'N
❑ Yes e"No'
❑ Yes [11'N-o-
Reviewer/[nspector Signature:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility ASsesslneut Unit
Date: e- /)- ­9 7
4/30/97

Facility Number:_(1_51L- 3i
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date:
Time:
generai mtormation:
Farm Name: o�7 o .r County:
Owner Name: Phone No:
One Site Representative: ,, a r Integrator:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address/Location
Latitude: 1 I Longitude: 1 1
Operation Descrlptlon: (based on design characteristics)
Type of swine No. of Animals Type of Pouftry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
stow .1OOD Mayer DDairy
Mursery InNon-Layer oBeef
OFeeder ! 2 1 0 ��
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals: _
Number of Lagoons: Z (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Faclilly Ins ection:
Lagoon 'P c ti rn r 1\ 3 Y' Z. Iz f+
J
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes ❑ No B"'
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ No 137Y
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is any discharge observed?: Yes ❑ No 12-
0 Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑ No 0
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Acreage:

Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet
of Blue Line Stream?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Does record keeping need Improvement?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management
Plan on site?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Explain any Yes answers:
Signature:
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Drawin s or Observations:
AQI-January 17, 1996
Date:
Use Attachments if Needed

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ala
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 20, 1996
Mr. Adolf Miller
Smithfield Carroll's
P.O. Box 1240
Waverely, Virginia 23890
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-33
Carroll's Farm # 27
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Miller:
On November 19, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoons had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the
inspection, the facility was found to in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, i
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N50%
� C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Carroll's Farm #27
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
of Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Mr. John Fitzgerald -Regional Coordinator, DSWC--WARO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, 1LFW*WA
Health and Natural Resources •
Raleigh regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
ry � F
Jonathan B. Howes, SecretsetaC
Boyce A. Hudson, regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 21, 1995
Mr. Rudy Grammer
Smithfield Carrolls
P. 0. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Swine Operations
Facility Numbers: 11, 27, 29, 30, 36, 37,
and 39.
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
On July 11, 12, and 15, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the
Raleigh Regional Office conducted compliance inspections of the
aforementioned animal facilities. These inspections are part of the
Division's efforts to determine potential problems associated with
liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visits determined that wastewater from these
facilities was not discharging to the surface waters of the state.
In addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
were observed at these facilities. As a result, these facilities
were found to be in compliance at the time of their inspection.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Rudy Grammer
Smithfield Carrolls
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspections
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jud�Eajett
Water QualSupervisor
/ds
H:\animdn
cc: Northampton County Health Department
,Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Pat Hooper -Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

a-1995 15126 Ff2W DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO .
PRO P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate Anendnr.-
Facility No.
DTVISION OF ENVIRONNENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS STYE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7 " / Z , 1995
Time: _ �/ c/ _S"
Fm Name/owner- ; t/i �` �' -e/ o/
ar
Mailing Address: �' V. B v K 4
County: M rl fl q.•,, l 2-11
Integrator. Phone: TO q- y' 7/
On Sire Representative: Phone:
Physical Addressa ocadon: J� �" � 2 � j r 2
vtl
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity:. S Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE— DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: _ Feet
Circle Yes. or No
.Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foo[ + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) t r No Actual Freeboard: Y__Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes � Was any erosion observed?(Z�or No
Is adequate land available for spray? &or No Is the cover crop adequate? Vior No
Crop(s) being utilized: rK, 10
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? `Y or No
_he animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ors�)
`> animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or To
T; animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
sirnila_r man-made devices? Yes q0 If Y -es. Please Explain.
Kos the r:tCHIEy maimain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? 1 ee4or No
Additional Comments: li, :/O"/ c� 1� � KA-r f Ls3 h d � vt r'j i , 'f �• _S f C141 J"
f O ,�o YH A eQ 2d h—� S .5 F fg _ d e. ro , n�� _�f �� 3 n c IL
l
tic: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL F.02

�UL_z�-1995 15:26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTIONTO RRO P . a2i l2
,
Site Requires Immediate Attention- .
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD 66 —30
DATE: 9-/ ?-- , 1995 /ft�<
Time: / �/od
Farm Name/Owner. SM ; 1%i e/c/ �C19rry J Z9
Mailing Address: P, D ��C_ /Z Ll A �� r�P,r �'j /,/ % T --
County: _ IvOrVIA22210n
Integrator. Phone: b cf - i�3 Y ` ZI O T
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
S'e- /Zv !
Phone:
Type of Operation_ Swine -/' Poultry Cattle _
Design Capacity: 10 o o So tf-S Number of Animals on Site: 5 0 P o `` ,14,31
DEhI Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' � Longitude:' ' Elevation: -----_Feet
Circle Yes. or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have suffcienr. freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately l Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: q1____�t. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes 00 Was any erosion observed? Yes No
Is adequate laud' available for spray? or No 1s the cover crop adequate? es r No
Crop(s) being utilized: r -rJ 0
Does the facility meet SCS minimum. setback criteria'! 200 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? 0 or No
^e ar.irnal waste stockpiled- within 100 Feet of USGS Blue. Line Stream? Yes orl
a;umal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes
animal waste discharged into waters -of the state by roan -made ditch, flushing system, or other
�irnilar man-made devices? Yes o o .if Ytts.,Please Explain.
Lnc facility maintain adequate waste matiagerncnt .records (volumes of ruanure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)?(:y:eS:> No
Additional Comments:
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
E
TOTAL P.02

943 P22
NORTH CAROLMA DEPARTMENT OF F_NVIRONMMn, RRA1 TH & NATUYtAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMMr
Fayetteville Regional Office
Animal. Operation Compliance Inspection Form
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
SECTION I
Animal Operation Type:
Horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or S.Aeep
f/! 4 e
SECTION_11
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 ,head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system)]
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation REGISTRATION?
3. A.re animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4. Does this facility have a CERTIFIED ANIMAL
WASTE MANAGEMENT PihN?
5. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
Y I N { COMMmTs
7

I JUL 0? ' 95 1S. 42 943 PO:5
SECTION 111
Field Site Management
1. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map Blue Line Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USG5 Map
Blue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover Crop in accordance with the
CERTIFICATION_ PLAN?
5. Is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?
b. Does the animal waste management -at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
(BMP) of the approved CERTIFICATION?
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard? How much? (Approximately _,�-5' / )
8. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
SECTION IV
Comments
C�v
Y N { CONMMTS j
i

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
e��
DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 20, 1996
Mr. Adolf Miller
Smithfield Carroll's
P.O. Box 1240
Waverely, Virginia 23890
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-31
Carroll's Farm # 28
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Miller:
On November 19, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoons had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the
inspection, the facility -was found to in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
Pan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, !' � FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%qAn Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/ 10°,6 post -consumer paper

", I 1
Carroll's Farm #28
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
"_Operator in.Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
16A- a ). � 4�­
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Mr. John Fitzgerald -Regional Coordinator, DSWC---WARO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ala
Raleigh Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
ry ID E H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secrets
Boyce A, Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 21, 1995
Mr. Rudy Grammer
Smithfield Carrolls
P. 0. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Swine Operations
Facility Numbers: 11, 27, 29, 30, 36, 37,
and 39.
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
On July 11, 12, and 15, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the
Raleigh Regional Office conducted compliance inspections of the
aforementioned animal facilities. These inspections are part of the
Division's efforts to determine potential problems associated with
liquid waste disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visits determined that wastewater from these
facilities was not discharging to the surface waters of the state.
In addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
were observed at these facilities. As a result, these facilities
were found to be in compliance at the time of their inspection.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Rudy Grammer
Smithfield Carrolls
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspections
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jud�Eajett
Water QualSupervisor
/ds
H:\animdn
cc: Northampton County Health Department
,Northampton County Soil and Water Conservation District
Pat Hooper -Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

5LIL-14-1995 15:26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02i02
Site Requires immediate A 7cn6or,
Facility No. �kk 3�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT'
ANU AL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SIT): VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7 ` /2 ` , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: _SH'r �r/�, ¢/c✓ G"f'. r ��f _ t�?� _
Mailing Address: c k 12 y o GJr 1 4"6 .
County: ,/O f 7-
integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: Z-04�e'y 13h I41-e y - v—" n 4:'� , Phone:
Physical Address(Locadon: / s-0 t
Type of Operation: 8win a Po
ol Cattle
try
Design Capacity: --'/t00 ' �n_1 Number of Animals on Site. i' - "?
DENT Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: - Longitude: Elevation. ,Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) (Qor No Actual Freeboard: _ fit. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or Was any erosion observed? Yes or&D
Is adequate land available for spray? 6�),s or No 1s the cover crop adequate? )!ii or No
Crop(s) being utilized: �" C - , �Jr • s -
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings? X,Es or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yzs�or No
=±c arimal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or o
ardmal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Lune? Yes or 'o
anitnal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing systeua, or uther
sirnilx- man-made devices? Yes of +o if Yes. Please Explain.
�.k,Cs ±llc facility maintain adequate waste m&iageracat r;!es�
(volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)*? r No
Additional Comments:
Oi SMIr rlc I Lp., r,/1 be'A, �� shy ,�C.• _, ,,- o, i Wi-�F'_..
Sa/,,/ �-r711 "� ci' !G3 a rc��1 .✓ Gxj -�� , i
Signatwe
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.0^-

10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DN1'Q inshection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspections 1 �Z
`l'ime of Inspection
©Registered E3Certified 0 Applied for Permit Q Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: L5 County: ... N�:..r... P.ro: ..........................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:..............................................,.......,................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title-,_ ............................................................ Phone No:...................,...............................
MailingAddress:........................................................................................................................................................................................................ ..........................
%Q
Onsite Representative:./ .(1.1.. ... lam./T. . ..... ........................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................. . Operator Certification Number................................ .
Location of Farm:
Latitude F ' 1 1& Longitude • 6 46
Design CCurrent
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
G
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design i Current •; ,
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I 1 10 Dairy
r❑ Non -Laver I I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other l I
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
`Number. of Lagoons /Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No I,irluid «'rite Management System "F
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed front any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon [I Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the convevance man-made?
b. Il'dischar-e is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. Ifdischauge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? x
[]Yes ff No
❑ Yes Pivo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes �la
❑ Yes/d No
No
❑_Yes /ZNo
ljeyeslo�_
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes [I0

Facility Numher: — IL
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ElYes OINO
Structures f La goons I-ioldin ► Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? �(es ❑ No
Structure l Structure 2 Structured Strupure 4 Structure 5 Strugt re 6
Identifier: inn- .`....b?Q. ....�� �:?..v.......V.!...j pllll�...'.................... ��........(�...... �.`................. ..� d............ � �,
Freeboard(ft): 1...1.5.............. ....F.........,., ............................................................,.................................�...............
\ i� p
10. Is seepage observed from any oof the structt3res: 1 � l"t -a -7 Yes [ o
11. Is erosion. or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'. p `� El Yes 'o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ((Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
11 Do any of th5 structures layk adequate, minimum or maximum li M level markers? 'Yes ❑ No
GW OU IVur 4'
Waste AppGc•ation
14, Is there physical evidence of over application? j�f,S Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoffenteringwaters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ... .. �..1`.S.T.......................................................................................................................................... ................................,...� ......-
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑Yes [J No
17, Does the fa alit have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment'?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
2 L Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
22, Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
[�o
❑ Yes
C�No
❑ Yes
iJ No
9Yes
'o
❑ Yes
PNo
EK eS
❑ No
E3 No.violations or deficiencies. were' noted- during' this' .visit..You will receive -no further
correspondence ab.out this visit'.,'.`.
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes 9 No
El Yes 91 N'o
Go nments (refer to t�uestion #) :explain any.YES ansWers,and/or any�reconunendations or any ;other comments =*
Use..drawings of facility to better„explai Aiu.ationc (use additional pages as necessary)
Mir 2)-, oC r r /t/":,j Cnise--
n C C viz /a V,
wv>P G� C/f��/2G���.S �,,e j''���r i�.-rJ G.c�- �►t '. ;�y� ���s�����
a C 1 rc-
_���� ff j
��(,, 1('1'ho C7�- � YZC ,x,,J` � + `�4 U7l S G7 V�'� rri Q p �i � � G>' G C (i�flhte �!'! /�'] r✓(�j(�; T"'C- 1 , f �
a Ti F` 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name x '' Y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature i,_ .�/1�_� Date: akky

G/fiL L -L,
Facility Number• -- 3V I I)ute of Inspection 3
r `
cc.ir 5 ,
C�
d t jj
O 1' 64e4
14 bE,"t 0
` 7/25/97

JUL. 07 ' 95 15: 41
i
94.E P02
=z-
w -- -� Z
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF $NIRONMMTP, HEALTH & NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONHMMAL MANAGENaWT
Fayetteville Regional Office
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
EC ION T
Animal. Operation „Type:
Horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or sheep
L?CTION 11
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system))
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation REGISTRATION?
3. Are animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4. Does this facility have a CERTIFIED ANIMAL
WASTE NANAG$ENT PLAIN?
5. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on..specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the SC5 minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
S
Y I N I COMMENTS
100

UL 07 195 15:42
S43 ROZ
SECTION III
Field Site Management
1. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map slue Line Stream.?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS Map
Blue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
CERTIFICATION PLAN?
5. is animal wastes discharged into waters of
the state by man --made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?.
6. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
(BMP) Of the approved CERTIFICATION?
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard? How much? (Approximately Y ^� )
8. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
SECTION IV
Comments
Y I N I COTS

JUL-14-1995 15: 26 FROM DEN WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
PRO P.02/02
• Site Requires Immediate _Attenjor.
Facility No. _
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT T r� �3
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD t�
DATE: 7 /2 ` , 1995
Tame.
Farm Narne/Owner:
Mailing Address: D 60 X 12 yo A/ ► e r /, 4-1# .
County: /3/o r �Nr� n., pf� ._ .,. - _ - _ _____ .,.•..—._
Integrator: Phone: o `� - �3�i _ Z�v4
On Site Representative: 69102� <tr� �� y ` �"'�" 11� _ Phone:
Physical Addnessa=adon:
Type of Operation_ Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: / &or) - :5i/ _ Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DENT Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation. meet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately l Foot + 7 inches) _Y ge or No Actual Freeboard: Wit. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes or( Was any erosion observed? Yes or,g)
Is adequate land available for spray? (5c)s or No Is the cover crop adequate? ZG or No
Crop(s) being utilized. !" (° ! 6, b4r ; s _
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'! 200 Feet from Dwellings? a .or No
100 Feet from Wells? x or No
_'te animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
artimal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or o
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by roan -made ditch, flushing system. or gather
similar man-made devices? Yes or(e If Ycs. Please Explain.
7h Oct; [tic facility waintain adequate waste nlanagernent records (volumes of n1anure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)'' d�esr No
Additional Comments: [_ rl / _ j___ /� o �_/, ,-rf e. -
I , T J 4 ix i d eq - 1 L, n, F, �� �j �/Y! i .7 G� .� a . {�Y7 SSY r �-C Q istw—
1 Sol, J l~ n r1 Se rr� a- /2�-, w os-%oaf
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

Facility Number:- 3 D
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date:
Time:
General Information:
Farm Name:_►_ f m Gar, County:�U
Owner Name: Phone No:
One Site Representative: i�d�zP-� Integrator:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address/Location C, 1
Latitude: I 1 Longitude: 1 1
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine N of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
[sow 190 0 Mayer [Dairy
ONursery ❑Non -Layer ❑Beef
[Feeder
Other Type of Livestock: pvo Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: Z (include in the Drawings and observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection: i- nL--
Lagoon UU ."' -" �
�(I iMo� i L �3 � 5•eGUs itq'= `� � n 4
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Is erosion observed?.
Is any discharge observed?:
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?. -
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Acreage:
Yes ❑ No IY
Yes ❑ No M—
Yes ❑ No QY
Yes ❑ No Cl--'
Yes ❑No❑
Yes ❑No❑

f
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet
of Blue Line Stream?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Does record keeping need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management
Plan on site?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Explain any Yes answers:
Signature: Date: L.4, 9 1 f 19 c
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
prawinas or Observations:
AOI—January 17, 1996

JUL-14-1995 15:26 FROM DEH WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRo P.02i32
Site Requires Immediate Attention -
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT J
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERA11ONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7 r/ z- , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address: ' ©� O K I Z 0 �jv)OULri y
County: 0 r4 fro
Integrator: Phone-
On Site Representative: Phone: go
Physical Addresa ocation: 5 2
Type of Operation: Swine _ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 1 �° o u,. i Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation. --Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Anunal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yoe No Actual Freeboard: y fit. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o± Was any erosion observed? Yes o No
Is adequate land available for spray? Y� or No 1s the cover crop adequate? r No
Crop(s) being utilized. Aq,
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'! 200 Feet from Dwellings?� or No
100 Feet from Wells?0,,Rs or No
".Ile arirnal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or/_
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yesof< To
7; animal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-made ditch, flushing system, or other
Jm;lsr man-made device%? Yeso rr'No If Yes. Please Explain. —
')A wc5 lric ►:lCility Maintain adequate waste nlanagernctst Teeords (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)''(
Additional Comments: (9 #1 S I e- `7//7
>Q V1. d4win 'aw cJ •- e_) r ,qPk
r No
Cd
ac.�f �Sv rt r
rLo n,-- _ J 1= f , s , , {__ tw o L� r _G e s c7w., e
Pro -
S76dttue
cc: Facility Assesstnent Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.e2

W.
JUL. 07 ' 95 15; 41 94.5 P02
�c --40 /
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMF: V OF ENVIMONMEW, HEALTH & NAT[1RAL RESOURCES
DMSION OF ENVIRMHURUAL MANAGENSNT
Fayetteville Regional office
Animal Overati.on Compliance Inspection Form
F NAMl3%09�. ..... " TN�'rHEG��g1Y''"#7�►"�.. �",AR1� ",�11��t
S
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
correctiorss:
,SECTION I
Animal Operation Type:
Horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or sheep
Swln -�
,SECTTON_11
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? iCattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system)]
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation REGISTRATION
3. Are animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4. Doer, this facility have a CERTIFIED ANIMA.
WASTE MA[QAGMENT PLAN?
5. noes this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, lard applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
Z j r
Y I N { CON ENTS
I/

_`aw fl—
aw
_TUL 07 195 15:42
943 P03
SECTION III
Field Site Management
1. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft, of a USGS
Map Flue Lane Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft_ of a USGS Map
Slue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
CgRTIFICATION_PLAN?
5. is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man --made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?.
b. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
(BMP) of the approved �TYFICATION?
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard? How much? (Approximately �- S )
S. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
SECTION IV
comments
Y 4 N f COLTS

•.,sgp'!'1"L'LLit t2?!,•Wltt[,.J.y��ewiT:a,mr'rzN]YifwuWY'^^Y:eiwry..;XivM*T4+^yBnWr.. �...-.a.. .. T .. . ..,,a .,,...��.. .., ^...
y
—IIiSWC Animal Feedlot Operation ReviEW
DWQAnimal Feedlot Operation Site
Inspection
Facility Number �
Date
Farm Status: 0 Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
91tiertified ❑ Permitted
of DSAVC
ofinspection
Time of Inspection i i 3 f r� i 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Tirne'(in fraction of hours
(es:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review I • 2.S
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ................................................................................................................................................
Farm Name: ........ t....�i.t:.t_9..I_5....._r..c>o,c)s..F ....f�`...................................... County:
..... /.V.l.,v/r_ . ey..�j%c�.ter............................
CGrro1,S l"Ool]S01 VCL . �1gSf
OwnerName:............ .................................................................................................. I hone No:........................._ ..........0.9.................................
Facility Contact:..........1.......{.........1........."Citle:.......................... Phone No:..........................:......................
Mailing Address: ... P..U.:... `] yl. ..... ......
(_24.;0 w,G .�.\./.......v.G........... 2..3�c...D............................................................. ..........................
._ /7....... J
Onsite Representative: ............(...!-.G./'Q�2�r.c�../../............&YY._;.?fT........................ Integrator:.... a.C.cy„5........- .5, GS...........................
Certified Operator:....... ap. e� tt ........................ Operator Certification Number;.. p.,.. 7 ............
Location of Farm:
........................P.......I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.�. .r..�...............N.:.... �........G<.s ,a.......................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 1 0 ", 1 11 Longitude L
�• ' U,,
Type of Operation e Design Current Designl,. Currents
Design .-Currents,
Swine Capacity,=Population Poultry CapacityPopulation
Cattle Capacity, Population >
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Nun -Layer
❑ \bn-Dairy -
Total Design Capacity
I Z243,93 ;12
Il"7.00o
Total'SSLW
s
Number of Lagoons /holding Ponds Z
❑Wean to Feeder
-
❑ Feeder to Finish.
❑Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
arrow to Finish
000
� 11
❑ Other
General
1. Are [here any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
2. Is any discharge observed from any par[ of the operation?
Discharge originated at ❑Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. I (discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made:?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Wares? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the watersofthe'Stateoth than±from a discharge?
{i
5. Does any part of the waste management system (ottie''ritian.lagoonk/htilding'ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97
❑ Yes rvo
,(y'
ElYes Ly'rvo
mom ME 'I
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0130
❑ Yes (�o
El Yes'L7No
Continued on hock

-:..., ., . ..- .. ,.,r,• fin- w•: �°. s~ +FA*' �.rw'AW'"w r rx i�x+iz ,... r-, ,;;x,,
.y-i. .W . -..x r,�'ti 7'{ •�•! R i !-. Ir,�. V", .y � y, �t.� �yT ^.eel.. Z!"rv-tir.}i 37"�."v.'Y i'.I C":4i,'�; N: re.,•µ;,,
• l acilit Number:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ©'No
r
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes E ' o
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes ©T10
Structures (Layoons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? i ❑ Yes 13`No
yy, � rust 5ac� rdar � •
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
y- s ia.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes ETo
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[9Tlo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
' No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13•
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
lJ 90
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application'?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, orrunoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
kk
Cats k-, ` ,gsz �•uGram..........................•......•........
Crop type s'.......................s ..................•.........•.....................•.....................................................•...........
t6.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
O-No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
E i�o
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
21�0
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
o
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�Eg
© 'No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®-No
For Certified facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
U-No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
010
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit
Date:
4/30/97

PRO P.02/02
JL'L-14-1995 15:26 FROM
Site Requires Immediate Agtn!j orn
Facility No. 6 31
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7 ^ Z , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner
DEN WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
2J
Mailing Address: f �,...,' Y _ /
County:
Integrator. Phone: _
Ott Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Addres&U ation: 5.2- �/ 7, 0
Type of Operation Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: I 00 'U' S Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: Ate DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Dees the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) ,-Yet or No Actual Freeboard: '_� Ft. __,___ Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or NO Was any erosion observed? Yes or`No
Is adequate land available for spray? & or No Is the cover crop adequate? � r No
Crop(s) being utilized: /n � a - C; ��� ..- .
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?,�. or No
100 Feet from Wells? -V4s or No
-• ,Jie animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or'
a:timal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Lane'? Yes or T
's animal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-made ditch, flushing system, or ether
drni1.ar man-made devices? Yeah or No if Yes. Please Explain. - -S4-'�7 "7 4C�
'h Ics 14C facility maintain adequate waste managernent records (volumes of ruanure, land applied.
spray irrigated on s-pceii-ic acreage with cover crop)?. Yes or No
Additional Comments: Ls5 =ytn; jSAS L -?/I ; � r+J Ja .r' b e." f, •c- �"
v+ J �f L r is r;
_�►�! C� t"l ,f'� 5� ^ /3 �/ r i`i 0-i" ' i- C� 14v ►� b C
rtW D LA P.0 t ��_ �'( 1-
144 A-r f r/,Oh +h ram'
5ig'trattcr e
cc: Facili ty Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

Facility Number:4L-:
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date:
Time:
General Information:
Farm Name: .6, ,* ag c, (o)S _ _County:�-
Owner Name: Phone No:
One Site Representative:llrrr,..�42=�� Integrator:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address/Location _12- e
Latitude: I 1 Longitude: I I7:1
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Ty f Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
d owl _ ❑Layer ❑Dairy
ONursery ❑Non -Layer nBeef
❑Feeder
Other Type of Livestock: ° c n o Number of Animals:
Number of L.agoons:_Z_(include in the Drawings and observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facill!y Inspection:
Lagoon r[ �_- -54f �'L
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 toot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes ❑ No
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ No 0---
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑ No Ca/
Is any discharge observed?: Yes ❑ No
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes O No ❑
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Acreage:

� Y
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet
of Blue Line Stream?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Does record keeping need improvement?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management
Plan on site?:
Yes ❑ No ❑
Explain any Yes answers:
Signature:
oc: Facility Assessment Unit
Drawings or Observations:
AOI-January 17, 1996
Date: l f 1 / Y
Use Attachments if Needed

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
I ILTIMWA
1DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 20, 1996
Mr. Adolf Miller
Smithfield Carroll's
P.O. Box 1240
Waverely, Virginia 23890
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 66-31
Carroll's Farm # 28
Northampton County
Dear Mr. Miller:
On November 19, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoons had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the
inspection, the facility was found to in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office..
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NiC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 MMIRMOS112 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

�f
Carroll's Farm #28
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
" Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Northampton County Health Department
Mr. Tony Short, Northampton Soil and Water
Conservation District
Mr. John Fitzgerald -Regional Coordinator, DSWC--WARO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan 8: Howes, Secretary
November 12, 1996
Smithfield Carroll's Farms
Farm 29
PO Box 1240
Waverly Va 23890
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Farm 29
Facility ID#: 66-30
Northampton County
Dear Farm Owner:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerel
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, AW W 4 FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 NV� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 100% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B: Howes, Secretary
Smithfield Carroll's Farms
Farm 28
PO Box 1240
Waverly Va 23890
e��
L-.;IEHNR
November 12, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Farm 28
Facility ID#: 66-31
Northampton County
Dear Farm Owner:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation -as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, �y�C FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal Opportunity/A�rmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10°/. post -consumer paper

Facility Number:-_Z
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: i
Time:
WUIIUFUI 1111UMIULIU11:
Farm Name: r- ! S County: �o y7
Owner Name: Phone No:
One Site Representative: FPS /L - Integrator: r!'`'t-,-✓ 1lS
Mailing Address:
Physical Address/Location 5%z /" /
Latitude: 1 1 Longitude: 1 I
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Z,f Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Carrie No, of Animals
V0 OLayer Wairy
CNursery Mon -Layer OBeef
OF -seder
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: 2-�(include in the Drawings and observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection: / _ I V' "
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?
is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Is erosion observed?:
Is any discharge observed?:
❑ Man-made ❑ Not Man --made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: G r, sirs — Acreage: _
Yes ❑ No )<
Yes ❑ No I� '
Yes ❑ No /
Yes ❑Nod
Yes ❑NoB'
Yes ❑No�

Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?: Yes ❑ No 0
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet
of Blue Line Stream?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Does record keeping need Improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management
Plan on site?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Explain any Yes answers:
Signature: Date: 1 /— (::� 13,(
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
Drawings or Observations:
AOI-January 17, 1996