640013_PERMIT FILE_20171231

-Omni
2 V
NUH I H CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

(Type of Visit: P Copkpliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Q-16 ' Arrival Time: �� Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: i4 t 4 ,U r S -! l i V A tn Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Title:
Phone: _
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Wean to Finish
I
ILayer
I
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I
INon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Design Current D Cow
ltr. Ca a c i P■o Non -Dairy
Beef StockerGilts
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
ers
Beef FeederBoars
tLavers
Beef Brood Cowother
Other
Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes Z 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) [] Yes NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesrNo
NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued
J

j
Facili Number: - Date of Ins ection: Q- Z�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
WeN�:-O
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): d!
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No / NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta
reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes❑
VNo NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ApBlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑Yes
o NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable
, Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop TYPe(s): % A-1,It2r-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes FN9,
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design O Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Trans ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspectio ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

lFlacility Number: jDate of Inspection: ,
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yesg�N
NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
25. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes;No
No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours andlor document ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
[]No
[] NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments,(refer to queAion #) Eiplain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or: any other cotnnents .i�
Use, drawing`s of I'acili ' ,to better ex' lain_ situations;(use additional ages is necessa ).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: N, i iiscJ -2- i j
Page 3 of 3
Phone: '71 1- l{ 2_,2 a
Date: %C' ZG -v
214120I5

1Type of Visit: 0 Coroutir
cc Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: e O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emereenev O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Timer Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: A tAa r -3=.1( a d tin Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 4 r4AW ✓ 5A Z1;114-h _ Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wet Poultry
La er
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
C*attle
Dairy Cow
Design
C►apacity
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Dry P,oult ,
Design Current
Ca aei P,o P.
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
I I Beef Stocker
Gifts
Non -Layers
I I Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Othei
01 Other
Turke s
cy Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes 4 <NNo"'_jL] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �/o
❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes [6 NIA
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Plumber: - Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA [] NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes >No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes:;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No Q NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
[] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure
to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): f J
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[] Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
D Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ YesYN
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste TrMoo
Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspectiodge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number:- Date of Inspection: r
G
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ZN ❑ NA
ONE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No 0 NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge
levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern`?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility'? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes [] No [] NA [] NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [:]No
❑ Yes [:]No
[] Yes [] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain: any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations,or any other comments.
Use drawings'of facility to better explain:situations (use additional pages as necessary).
tC�A-C.; 1"), iS woe/<,vij -�p(�( rctf (1� - P 1y4r7/ f
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r 1Gc ST
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 7 g / - Y Za d
Date: I ,'— �% —/�
21412015

(Type of Visit: Wcom ' e nspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation (� Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:1 Departure Time: County: Region:
FarmName: { �y .�j�� ��(/ n Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title: Phone:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design
CurrentIm
Design Current
Design
Curren
ry
Capacity Pop.
Cattle
Capacity
Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
on -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
1)r. P,oultu
Layers
Ca aci P,o P.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Qther
Turkey Poults
Other
FTOther
Discharzes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[—]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
ZNN DNA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued
i

r
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes VN;o — -NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): l�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes pNoD�NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [] Yes ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �oD
A ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): J s-zpig
13. Soil Type(s);
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
NoNA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes2No:000
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP [:]Checklists ❑ Design [-]maps [] Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections udge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [] NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

t
Facilit Number: L - Date of Inspection: -- 3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes gNo
o A ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
l'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

q- 25
(Type of Visit: 0-0Com ' ctinee Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: RouQ Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: -u L Arrival Time: ® Departure Time: �County:
Farm Name: rT It+kap— Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Non -La er
DairyCow
DairyCalf
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design C*urrent
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P,oultr. Ca aci P,o P.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Pullets
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Boars
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ElStructure ElApplication Field ❑ Other:
a, Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes No ❑ ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [:]Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Fadili Number: - Date of Inspection: — 2�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No_ NA ❑ NE
•w
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
r
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):�f l/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity the of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental rent, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes No NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
05
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): j'3Q r w7 s-t 4!3 , �� A n 4-f>-1,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes No NA
❑'NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE',
acres determination?
%
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes � ❑ NA
❑ NE
/NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No NA
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
NA
❑ YesRNA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste TrWeather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspectidge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[:]Yes
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

FaMity Number: (0 jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Otber Xssnes
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 1 21412011

for Visit: Qf Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I ? /.) Z� Arrival Time: 1 12 3 d Departure Time:1l County: Region:
Farm Name : 4� Y-f tkr :5 U!I iyA 11 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
sign Current
Swine acity Pop.
2we
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
FTLayer I
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I jNon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design Current
D P.oultr, Ca aci P.o P.
Dai Heifer
Da Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
keys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
. Is any discharge observed from any park of the operation?
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[] NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: 69 - /3 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Z NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �Noo NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental th eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Zo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Po riding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
[:]Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes❑
VNNP
NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
VNro
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design [:]Maps [—]Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facirity Number: - Date of Inspection: Y
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes No ❑ NA [3NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [3Yes 5X0_"*" F] NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain anyvYES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other�comments "
Use`drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as.necessary):,'
Z7 �s G0,14"IC 0 J (V rA5y S�we-D For Lq�aOn cl oS� ✓ �
Y-ls5''kS-i4hc e -
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: [3GT $+2 JZ T Le / _
Page 3 of 3
Phone: P %q yZ0 -a
Date: �.5-/ /3
21412011

L
fVisit C Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
n for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: I /�L a Arrival Time: 1 G Departure Time: ll= Yf` County: GJS Region: �cr�
Farm Name: 4'ixL_— Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone;
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: —
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: o = g Longitude: = e = 6
'd (.,BX ',�a8 Q': r, •'
AEv Design
S 3 $4 3 r
s3 ��(S 3x ��
aCutrren�t ;} fi} t
ffi`. a F r i.
�yDestgn+ p
�_ R $ K•��ik'�j Sf.•�L'1�
Off",
Gurrent� ,.. DeStgnrCnrrent
Swine # ti Capacity
a.
§Populations j 'et Ptoult yt
Capacity Population
l ,Ca He Capacity :Pop la on
s
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
6 ❑Dai Cow
. ❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ DairyCalf
❑ Feeder to Finish
c ifffi
❑ Dairy Heifer
1 ❑ Farrow to Wean
r
❑ D Cow
�
# ❑Farrow to Feeder
Dro
f y Pultry
`1"�
_, s
``da '
f
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
; ❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
i
❑ Gilts
� ❑ Non -La ers
� El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑Beef Brood Cow
r
g ' }
ther.«�;'t;fb'k..,:Ex
i;: ..•? ❑ Turke s
❑Turke Poults
I�.
❑ Other
¢ ❑ Other
lN¢ umbgk�er}}o,f Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[2`No
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

T
Date of Inspection
acility Number: 4 —
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
ZrNo ❑ NA
D. NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): t7
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
El -No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
;]`No ❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
.2TNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Rio ❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
E No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
; No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
P/No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
4e No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
13'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/inspector Name - I Phone: L/ ,,;,- ?9/- y 2 co
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

R
Facility Number: ry — If Date of inspection P777727F
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes F4f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes J2'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP`?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
.0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
IJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes )[3'*No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additiorial`,Commentsandl,O D"�' ln"',' a. P fie. ..��.<.
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit JcAoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: / 2/ 109 Arrival Time: f* : L'� Departure Time: 1 Z ' 3G County: �I ✓ GS� Region: !I G
�,r -
Farm Name: a �K- c� �� �o��nfl _ ._ Owner Email:
Owner Name: A. 5" // Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: —
Back-up Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = d Longitude: = o = 1
Design Current Design C►urrent Design Current
Swine C►►opacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
1
JE3 Layer ❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
1
10 Non -Layer I ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dai Heifer
Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
ElNon-Dairy
Stocker
❑ La ers El El
❑Non-ts ers ElBeef Feeder
El Pullets
❑El Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other Number of Structures:
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
L=110ther
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 0<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2fNo
❑ Yes
123"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
j2NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number- — /3 Date of Inspection 2/ a/0S
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [--]Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes 2�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): co
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
JZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
JZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
12No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
2fNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ .Yes
B No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
El -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
,2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
;rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer t6,question #) k Explain any{YES answers and/©r ny,. r) Commendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to Better explain situations:'{{(use'addittonal pages as necessary):
,:
r
ReviewerlInspector Name „ '%�r3G.af Phone: 9/9` 7 9/ — 3°2-0 c
ReviewerlInspector Signature: /d�I1 Brl Date: 1.2/ ?G/Q i
12128104 Continued

;Facility Number: Date of Inspection ryo5
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists El Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes j2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
FZ`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
Eallo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
E3"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ffNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
O-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments aridlor Drawin's ` ,r �tx 4 "i `, " t t`
ne
12128104

Type of Visit: __Compliance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: {/Gf Region: �n
Farm Name: SL/�'vcn Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
ign
=�"Pcs
►apacity
Wean to Finish
Current
Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
o
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dai Cow
o Feeder
Ma er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design C*urrent
Qr, P,oultr. Ca acitPo ,
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
;DlNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
F,,o�o
0 NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
,E!:rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

FaciUty Number: - Date of Inspection: z // /
Waste Collection & Treatment
Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ,2r-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [:]Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes .2'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E!fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ,E!f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 'Ea'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ;2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes PNo
❑ NA
❑ NI?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes )�!J`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes JZ"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ;�fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [] Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZfNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes W1 No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes VNo
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

FaQ ity Numher: I Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ErNo
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes � No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ko
Other Issues
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
P3f�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
FZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
;2-1�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
O'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[�no
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #,), &Explain any YES apswers,and/or, any ;addiiionaE'rrecortimendo'tion's'o'r' any,`'other comments. k'
Use'drarvings of facility'tri better explain situatiops,{ase;add�ttionlpuges;asnecessary)..
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

Type of Visit 10 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: �� I�� �� `j Arrival Time: 1 yc_ Departure Time: • �� County: /` tr� Region: X C
r Farm Name: r'j'ch-c'' k-hfP4Lje Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = ❑ Longitude: = n ❑ I ❑ {f
Design Current . ! , Design Current ,' Design 4 '+Current
Swine Capacity Populatign i We Poultryt=q Capacity FPopulattou ! �Cat`tle a� ' l i 'Cap city 'Pppulati nY
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy Cow
ElWean to Feeder ❑ Non -Layer El Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean El Dry Cow
Dry PouItry�
❑ Farrow to Fccder ❑ N D
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
.Other r------- — - - - -
❑ Other
❑ Layers__
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
7
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
on- ary
�' ❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
"t
;tom• t!
�g Number of Structurer tC
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 q f 3
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo
[--]Yes ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes /❑rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

I.Fa Number: i' — / Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes B"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): _ Lt8' 64t L/j
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [--]Yes ,rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes FfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Jallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
O—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
O—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
2[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name �j,�� %�eL�z . Phone: �lp— 7 mil" /Ze^c
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: , — Date of Inspection
Reouired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ETNo, ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
,�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
ZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
'mo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
,[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ;3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
OrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
,fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ZI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
J!jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addrtional Comimenits andh i Draw n(�s ' �� & +' p ; 1(
-- 1;. Fi-. '.
1z
Page 3 of 3 12128104

91/a (6
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z b-fl Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: +k V'►' S i- I_I t ✓pq At ., Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 e = f = Longitude: = ° = ' =
td
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
to Finish
❑ La er
❑Dai Cow
an to Feeder
❑ Non -La er
❑ Dai Calf
der to Finish
❑ Dai Heifer
Ran
row to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ D Cow
row to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
row to Finish
La ers❑
❑ Non -Layers
Beef Stocker
s
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
El Beef Brood Cow
❑Turke s
_
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) IsN
❑ A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page l of 3 12128104 Continued

i
Facility Number: 1;i, q-
Date of Inspection(2Sl a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): oi
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No A El NE
El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No A [INE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA [3 NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? El Yes;No NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)�
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No NA ElNE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes:�NNA
o . NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre detennination?❑ Yes
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application`? ElNo NA El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? [I Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
,li �aEuf i x. , !_,, ," �t�.A i r. < . rEf1t::;{i}
Cio nmenrts (re)fer, 4!� quest>6ni#) t Fxp1la nea ny YESr a efs andlortany: re o mm£ ndahons or, any otherfcomments,
Use d�rawtngs of factlitylto better explain situations. (use additional pages as Reces"sary):
a
Reviewer/inspector Name (� �.. - - - - -1 Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: LE
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: (0 — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
❑ Yes LSN0 A El NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. U Yes CJ No U NA LJ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No�A ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes PNo[0__1
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes. ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments andl6r.Drai4in s 5=,i; `" _ `I KIWI sFs
Page 3 of 3 12128104

rr t
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Z Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine Q Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 4 Z
Date of Visit:tt"tine:
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Fermitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally
Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated 4 or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: rd &'1 er rat SC -1 County: '7-Se
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone No:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 06 06 'fi Longitude a 6 «
Design'` '. Current
awme uapacity ra utation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
n Farrow to Finish
Boars
Design Current Design Current
P ultry Capacitv Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population:::
❑ Layer p FEI
Dairy I❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other I I
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): U rt
05103101
Yes ❑ No
❑ Ye No
Yes ❑ No
Ai- spr-.
❑ Yes [2'1 0
es ❑ N
❑ Yes No
es ❑ No
Structure b
Continued

Facility Number: L — / Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any'of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type A i on L.JA. Sr- -T rru ^--5
13. Do the receiving crops differ with Those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records &_Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Cl No
❑Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspcction with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
FF No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
z w
Comments(refer to question #). "Explain airy YES answers and/or anyrecoirtmendations ©r any other comments:'
H®e,dfi.a+..Ye34M,. L' [Z as.TdX6' c�m., _ :m K. .,t.:."4"' - c rH2s; • -' �3
as necessary ;` ` ❑ Field Copy final Notes
r-1/ra400' h01- 6414l,�C1 A7/ Cf 4(e_ �4111C 14..E-1
I � Li✓I�.q_'I�7 ii'1inn.0sP441 1VVv,r 44►iT /-h1to &G2tr.-e GOh-►a-
h9c/�C
fV 0,1 OP- /.- -e,,o4 Je_ . 7,l.1L= )el s r� � � � �r � r �S 4 "e; , 1 ZeSQ fs i,G �2 P,�1r y
Reviewer/Inspector Name V'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
05103101
Date:
Continued

Facility Number r C Date of Visit: 2 Time:
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
© Permitted © Certified ©Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: 4C.4..J.A..G..41.1A... .' .7. %.r,1. C ........I .................. County:.....................................................................................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:....................
MailingAddress:................................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: .........................................................................
Certified Operator: .... ....... }... I.IVG...................................................................
Location of Farm:
PhoneNo:.. .................................................
.... ...................................................................../............... ..........................
.............................................
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle [3 Horse Latitude • 4 66 Longitude • 6 44
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
to Finish
tow
s
WN
Poalt� ��i
Cotai Design Capacity C
,Total'SSLW ° C
''�"Y J�" J❑ Subsurface Drains Present jL] Lagoon Area . I❑ Spray Field Area
...... ............
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System I `
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon pray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
Yes
0 _.�
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes iVo
❑ Yes .� 1`�
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway es ❑ Noy,
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......... ....I............................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

i
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection C�
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application_
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
[--]Yes
'No
11. Is there evidence of over application? [-]Excessive Pond ing []PAN 4 y J�-rjj, L iI C�
es
❑ No
12. Crop type Q ,- 0") r w S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those desi nated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reouired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Ld'No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
es
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 �o•yi61'aEi6iis:or• cleficie'ucies v ere h ed. dirrir)d 4his:visitr Y;ojx dd further . .
comes oxide' "e: ab' f this visit: : :
AL
n V r�l'� + li. 7'"GJ t� + L'-�✓.�+ Jt•� . � � � dti� �- �-liiq G` I -rl�"r r'7� l � >��
�+1 17L" 7 -l� IGrI h�� h Ulf
I -I— 1?
Pk.,�tt:,�; i� ;�!Reviewer/Inspector Name € 1, , . I o .a�ai $. la.lit,`di€�a1 J ° `� ... - �..
��
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date:
3/23199

Facility Number: — Date of Imspection 0
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 0 Yes ❑ No
.&I
J
5/00

Type of Visit �,O�Outine
nspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for VisitO Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Uaw of visit:
Fa ility Number
ermitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [r Registered
Farm Name: Z'-', ... ........ !? �-�.� � ... �'.. (.........
��] Time:
Not Operational O Below
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............•............
County: ......................................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: /i`j............................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........... I...............
Onsite Representative:...........................Y............................................................................... Integrator:...&'f�.fJ-'.`............................................
Certified Operator:,,,, lG ,•.A n (7 .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry []Cattle ❑ horse Latitude Longitude �• �� 0��
im Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
��[] Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
3 '' ❑ Farrow to Finish
!` ' ❑ Gilts
Boars
�l
E Number of. Lag
#� , ,,Holding_Ponds;'%,Soi
sign: Current
racity Population Pouloy, ,
�❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Current Design
v Population ' Cattle Cataaci'tv
V (v opU ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity `
Tota1.SSLW':
�❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
ns ... . T
Traps € ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. II' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 i 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ............... ar........................................... . .... ................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100
�1
Field Area ;
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes jNo
o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes �'No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ o
Y� No
Structure 6
Continued on hack

Facility Number: — 13 Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/9/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes 21
�0_
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 'F.I"V
❑ Yes L3N4
❑ Yes JCJ�o
12. Crop type 0,9q.t'-htp-l', 5-"
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes Wo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ;�N�
b
Y
A r », . } Z/ 1913 l AL
p 1- ttk&.7 . ! ;�,,�p 6"a
Reviewer/Inspector Name .' ��� i� ; ; s* d -, l •;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C Date:

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0 Printed on: 1/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes :No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Z11;
❑ Yes No /
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes o
Additional! uornments and/orDrawings: , • � 3 ; ,. ,i_ - F „ <,
a`
r" 7 +h .A4 -4v P
r J F 6-m s4� C 6--rP
5100

[] ll WQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
t-
A„ �y
_iy1lU LC lfl 'l llltlCl.LlVll t.- V 3 _ ...,...
«-`I✓ACIIIt�°1Vuinber� 'r' t' 1' �.a -. .rii :5'_`%. •'� �rss r'a� L.�
t+Y ° aJt,.'.."3'.�'.'!q .. kµ•� _r.r... - -'i: - - r' �",.rr, _ -. •.•s- f_ °4 7Tllll!~ (If'IllSpeftlE}Il., r V 24 IIC. (hh.mm) .
3 z _ Total Tithe; (in fraction (If llotirs <
Farm Status Registered [j Applied for Permit 6 (ex:1.25 fora hr l5 hiin)) Spent on Review C
Certified t' ❑Permitted or It►spertinn (includes travel and lirocessing
Not A eratii3nal "Date Lii t Operated: ,,,,•
i,
r t zDe s0`�y c r1 Gr}t1lit} ,�
Farm Namc:.. l4r.CJ CI..�zz • ,P ..:: t,vc . LJ.S 7` ...:.
Owner l\iame �'. *I hOn Vf r z va a i
.S 4 j
1 tCllit�� • i p Mxi r y No fiFYtt kh.................�{ ra i u S �S7
then Yltone
......... _r'�....................... .r Z.
NlailingAddle,5...., ................................... :........................................................ ......
Onsite Representative:.:.: . "r .,7`...::....... ..:L. ........�.::..:.:..::.:... Integrator......................... ................ ........... .............
Certified Operator; .............. _
p operator Certification Number:.-.:.
Location of Farm:
!C....'...................................... ..�...-..........-..• ..w._..-�..w....--..-....'.........`.....=.. •.�.w . ..'..--•.................................................... ... .......................
•• ..-...fir•.... .•r,4• �. µ•kw •
`..• .. ..... .... .. ..... ..... ........ ... .. ........ ......
I,atttude Longittde
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If' discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c, if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes _. ❑ N(
❑ Yes �] Ni
❑ Yes Ni
❑ Yes ( [ N�
❑ Yes V1 N
❑ Yes
❑Yes WX
14r-+ ,

Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of desigO Lj Yes No
'
Did the facy failao have,a certified operator to responsible charge ❑Yes �No
�e"t-i,��., ,�t,��ere lagoons orst_,•„a,.��._.i.Y.3d�+A
*tructureS(Iaae0UltSandlorHuldingYondS)
r�i si atu9 ,rr , a s+ r' ❑YesNo
i GIs storage capactty (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate ,�, ,. j
Freeboard (ft) t Struture 1 ' , 3 Str1c,tur Stnicture 3 Structure 4 ' Structure 5 Structure
'�
f "1 .-... .. ...= .. .............................................................................................................I.r.............
:0. `Is seepage observed from any `of the,striictures? '' „ . - ❑ Yes y. No
i 1. Is erosion; or any -other threats to the integrity,of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o
7 { 1
12 Do any of the "structures need ma intenancelimproverrient? ; . r _ es o
(If any of questions 9-12,*as "answered yes, and the `situation' jioses
an immediate pii iic health or eirvirpnmental threat, notify DR'Q) (�
1 a � k'�T, n �'�•`
' , t;.�r:, r` a43a'r _t rrd�'=!'"k�.lh . i.., ,ii z r i. ail '"5+.� C
l3 Do any of the;structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ` v� r Yes h❑ No
Was fe••A`' ,licationl.,.'
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ; No
(If in excess of W/MP,,,or.
`ra�uynoffentenpg waters of the State, notify DWQ) „
15. Crop type ...........fl r.. ..`..:.::. 4llM...............................................................I............................................................................................................
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? [] Yes. VNo
... .. ..�...�-+'mow., rr.+-.h.- .., ...- .r ..s. .-.v.....+.'r-_;••Yr1.-..--......-,._.__......�.--.-..--..-.4-,..-�_.
17 Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? - -� r ❑ Yes Na
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? , w ,-µ„ _ _ ❑ Yes o
• ti.:.'=�"yiw .:.: r..u.ii...�.-wvw/s wrl'.rxiA. i.i:+.:ia.3 L4 wl
—'�- ssi7+n ••� ,.,�...J• La,. � ea ..fr+.�,4�: �r�«,..:. ,.,,{o,...c,... ,.,-,.;M„,.,v„�. �-: �.fuk-L�dre3
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o
20._ Does,facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? - ❑ Yes No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? .❑ Yes .. No
For CertifieYd Facilities Only
22.-' Does'the facility fail to have'a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? " '" "❑ Yes i"❑ No
23. Were, any additional problems �noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17• . AA-� rtn)ds11�� CL,� iz(�U� e.�iIile,,u 1�'Gr�e,'� �?�"rikal,, ,
4t" 0 ­v)-rz tzP P /.51%,(c r 12:0 suv,*
J
G� �✓7 ��s C)C.
�3 T�Fa�- �� �,� V ��7_�'r 11.E-r) r�-•t/ l e/3 iv�.vY� �� � � l/�7'-s��.,�/ ,
/Uv w up
Reviewer/Inspector Name

D Division of Soil and Water Conservation = Operation Review
i.�,• 13Divi`' ` of Soil and Water'Coriservation - Contfiliance Inspection a"`
s,ivision of Water QtatyCompliance Inspection []'Other Agency = Operation Review::= t,
otitine 0 Complaint 0 Follov,,-up of DWQ ins ection 0 Follow-up of DS%VC review 0 Other
Facil' y Number �--�� Date (it' Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: r.O.. ffG?.fi !..I7� 1...... 'a: !-P i. rs C'onnty:.. 7��!/.........................................
Owner Name; ... r d li L 4q r. c S _7M f'. Pltone No:
t?............................................................................. z...................................................................
Facility Contact: �is �..jy. �Q'r........ Title. " Phone No .......................................
Mailing Address: �7../....`....19 U.v..s...��.!h.....� .t?.! ...........0 � ..,.,:.....
nj L.......................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ,!<,ti.i�h/7. rr..1l Inte�;rat«r:f3rv��t 1.......................................................
........... ............. ...............
Certified Operator: 5..A k-...'t.................................. .. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
location of Farm: j iD
....................................................... ............ ... ... .....................................
Latitude Oro' ��� Longitude
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Po Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
Layer a 1 JE1 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of ]Lag oo ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
DischarLws & Stream mpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If' yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [:]Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance inan-made? ❑ Yes ❑ 0
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State ❑ Yes Wo f
c. [ discharge is observed, what is the estimatedflow in gal/min?
d. Does disch,u'gc bypass a lagoon system? ❑ Yes N
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'.' ❑ Yes
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than I'rom a discharge? ❑ Yes N /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Ye ' ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 titructurc 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
It{cntificr:
pp{ff{ k ))
Freeboard(inches):.....7J.�..................... ......4..4-,, .................................................................................................................................................................
1/6/94 Continued on back

FAiiity Number: G[� — �� _ Mate of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any pail of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings'?
Waste Application
Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
12. Crop type cem— xia 1.l...........................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rc aired .Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
IS. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard problems, over applica(ion)
23. Did �Revii,--
r/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. D city require it follow-up visit by same a4ency'?
Rio:violatians'or: deficiencies :were noted daring this visit:: Yoti will.retLeive no further
e6trresporjdence; about: this i�isit.: : :: : : : : : : : ::::.. :: :. :: :: ::: .:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes fo
❑ Yes �'No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ��O�
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ;O
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes lam' O
❑ Yes No r
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Lff No
❑ Yes . Vo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
1 /6/99 `'

Facility Number C Date of Inspection p
Time of'] nspection p 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Perini ted Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: I� . t c L� r' 7-2 p Count .......................
t........../............ tfl............................x .. �... s..C. �............................ y :...�'il .. .............................
Owner Name:........ ` _ e e �� Phone No:..............
Facility Contact: ....... !n................................................. Title:......................... ................ Phone No:
..........................................................................
MailingAddress: .............................................................................:.........
Onsite Representative: 1 ``' .L.... f.tr/ .......... Integrator:.-3 !;r,<... . !n /.r...'.�a.............
:r
Certitied Operator: .... ......................................... ..... ................................................. Operator Certification Number:........
Location of Farm:
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude = • EED EE7=" Longitude
. D"esagn Current'
Swine Capacity : Po iilation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
' Number of La
'Holding'Ponds'/ ohd Tra
rlicrtiaraoc k .(4trenni Tmnartc
Design"Current_ Fhy�, Design
:Current
Poultr Ca acity Population Cattle ; }. ,,Ca' act �..`Po ` ulation
Iff-Layer 1 ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
TotaFD"ign Capacity �
llfi��ki
Total SSLW,,,,'
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
`FO No Liquid Waste Management System
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estintated flow in gallrnin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ��}f
Freeboard (inches): .......2 .Y................
................................... .................................... ................................... ................................... ....
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
A,
❑ Yes PINo
i
❑ Yes 0<o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes�No
No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes I�lo
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
................. I.............
❑ Yes
Continued or\

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding AN
12. Crop type 6�r �. cs ��, 5'67 7 4_ 4 t, J
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17.• Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0'. 1Q YiQi igri�s.0 dgfcieucies wire 0004• 00ing this visit; • Y:oO *ill •tee iye ijd futftf
6 resnn'oiide& abaut: this visit. . .....................:........... .
❑ Yes 01,10
❑ Yes ,0"N0
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes IdNo
es ❑ No
❑ Yes ,o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes FNo
Yes
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0lo
❑ Yes o
El Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
}'J"409 ca-�� 0-
GCc Jr
c, 6h r Z/.--/ A`� C�S'e�►-� /P�llf�
`�-� 10.rre�,, y
e4 .PAS c/ 14A? YQw
t� c( �< .�r�• d mac,
cAe,��., { do
r'Lvh�� 57y/2�,sc,.,i/ r',/��r.�.•ig��
i1
l4, y
c
�/} pa,- 1✓ OrIL /1 ram✓ Lr
s v''L�
/3
71 Or- $ In o 114 4.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
L

JIJL-14•-1995 15:26 FROM Dal WATER DUALITY SECTION TO
RRC] P.02i02
Site Requires Immediate Attend n"
` Facility No.: ��
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS S VISITATION. RECORD
11 DATE: , 1995'
t.� Time:
Faso Nasxfe/Qwner U /D!/c. f `" "•-, Y/ 5-�-5 ": �!/
Mailing Address:2-
County:
Integrator: Phone:
On- Site Representative: rr Phone:
Physical Addrrss/Locadorc 40
„^ 6�, JType of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
�►i Design Capacity: Number of Animals on SiteZ4-5 "�4
:
6. DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Ladtude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event.
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes orri�fa ) Actual Freeboard: i Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(�s)? Yes of -N Was any erosion observed? Yes or 0o
Is adequate land available for spray? 0r No . Is the cover crop adequate? or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200'Feef°froti:i Dwellings s or No
100 Feet: from. Wells?' C9 or No
animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line•Strcam?' Yes or eo
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line?' Yes.or
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by rnan-made ditch, flushing systeiv,.or other,
;irri;ar man-made devices? Yes or 1f Y;;s, Please Explain.
!!]r f:.I. ility tuamcain adequate waste maxiagernerrt records (volumes of manure, land applied.
Spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)^ Yes o N'
Additional Comments:
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attach`menis if Neet�
TOTAL P.02

"- State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Hunt, Jr:; Governor'
nathdn:6. Howes, Secretary
r::.. - fto b,A..Hudson, Regional Manager
A Tk9; WA_ -
1••
. lk
No
® F_= F1
Division of Environmental Management
October 5, 1995
r.,s;.r4s .++,Production -Enterprises
Mr- ~Scott. -Braswell
P.O. 'Box 699
` ,Nashville NC 1"27856
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
" Layer Operation
SR 1310
Nash County
Dear -Mr.. Braswell:
-On September 6, 1995, Mr. Danny Smith from the Raleigh
-:.,'Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject
-,> animal facility. This inspection is a art of the Division's
f efforts to determine potential problems associated with liquid
y���waste disposal -•systems.
_Mr. 'Smith's site visit determined 'that wastewater from your
i"ty .was not discharging to the surface waters of the .state.
:Also, no -manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances
.(for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) were
_observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
significant management deficiencies were observed:
--Your lagoon had little freeboard, less than 12 inch in some
areas. Thi problem should receive prompt attention in order
to prevent a future discharge or a lagoon breach. A properly
functioning lagoon should have at least 19 inches of
freeboard.
In addition to continued waste facility management, this
deficiency must -be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. Please respond in writing to
the Raleigh Regional Office within 30 days of receipt of this
letter. You should specifically address how you plan to correct
this problem. Also you should submit a schedule (with dates)
:stating when these management deficiencies will be corrected.
.Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility oaf all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management, is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to -the assessment of civil penalties. of up to
3800.Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh,; North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

Production Enterprises
Page: _:2 _
$10,'000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed
permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste
management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by
a designated -technical specialist or a professional engineer. For
a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with
your waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Danny Smith at (919)'571-4700.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
/ds
H:\animdnl5
cc: Nash County Health Department
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

f
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources' '
I.KWA
Raleigh Regional Office
LE
James B. Hunt, Governor JIV�A��
ID E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
August 16, 1993
Mr. Scott Braswell
Braswell Milling Company
P.O. Box 669
Nashville, NC 27856
Subject: Compliance Inspections
Braswell Milling- 'Layer Operations
State Road 1310 and N.C. Rt. 58
Nash County
Dear Mr. Braswell:
On August 13, 1993 Mr. Karl Shaffer of the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted an inspection of the above named facilities. The
inspections were conducted to determine if compliance was being
maintained in reference to violations which had been noted in the
past. The two facilities inspected were those on State Road 1310
and along N.C. Rt. 58, about one mile south of Castalia. Mr.
Shaffer met two employees at the first operation, neither of which
spoke english. At the other operation, Mr. Shaffer met with James
Smith.
Both facilities were found to be compliant. However, at the SR
1310 facility, there was only two inches of freeboard on the
lagoon. This concerns the Division a great deal, as now is the time
of year when you should be lowering the lagoon level in
anticipation of the wet season. A simple two inch rainfall, which
is not a 25 year storm, would have caused the lagoon to overflow
and would have resulted in the recommendation for an enforcement
action. You are encouraged to give this situation your prompt
attention. This office will be monitoring the situation closely as
well.
3800 Barrett Drive. Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% past -consumer paper

Mr. Scott Braswell
Page -2-
If you have any questions concerning this information or the
site inspection, please contact Mr. Karl Shaffer at [phone].
erelyr 1
Ke et Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Nash County Health Department
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
CAFO Files
CAFO.INS/KAS

rT
RCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
August 19, 2015 D
William Aurthur Sullivan
Production Enterprises, Inc. Farm 1!!12015
5683 Taylors Gin Road
Castalia, NC 27816
MNR Subject: Permit No. AW1640013- R 001O9
Production Enterprises, Inc. Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Nash County
Dear William Aurthur Sullivan:
In accordance with your renewal request received August 12, 2015, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Permit issued to William Aurthur Sullivan authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
management system. You have dropped the animal population at this facility to zero until such time as
the waste storage lagoon at this facility is properly closed, as you no longer wished to maintain it as an
active poultry farm.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste structures on the Production Enterprises, Inc. Farah, with an annual capacity of no greater
than an annual average of zero (0) Laying Chickens.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 31, 2020 and replaces the Permit No.
AWI640013 issued to this facility on May 18, 2009. You are subject to the conditions of this permit until
the closure of all waste storage basins and the rescission of this permit. You must submit a letter to the
Division of Water Resources to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of closure of
all containment basins.
The issuance of this Permit does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all
applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, or federal) nor convey any property rights
in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T. 0111(c), a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards, a 100-ft separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this Permit may result in
revocation of this Permit or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C, the
Clean Water Act, and 40 CFR 122.41, including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, Norlh Carolina 27699-1636
Phone: [phone]M Internet: www,ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

In accordance with Condition 11.17 of this Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4) hours of
the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning, or a
Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You may
find detailed watch/waming information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC National Weather
Service office gt )y515-8209, or by visiting their website at: http://www.weather.gov/rah/
K imu Wia 6tontu ` the activity permitted under this Permit after the expiration date of this Permit, an
application for ren64'� st be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
�f
This Permit is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
•N!" TYi4 facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this Permit, please
contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G.
Director, Division of Water Resources
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Nash County Health Department
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (AW1640013)

J
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INDIVIDUAL POULTRY ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
William Aurthur Sullivan
Nash County
FOR THE
continued operation and maintenance of an animal waste management system for the Production
Enterprises, Inc. Farm (Facility), located in Nash County, consisting of zero (0) Laying Chickens and the
application to land as specified in the Facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 31, 2020 and shall be subject to the
following specified conditions and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The animal waste management system operated under this Permit shall be effectively
maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of pollutants
to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of waste to terraces and grassed
waterways is acceptable as long as it is applied in accordance with Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Standards and does not result in a discharge of waste to
surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. If the Facility has a discharge of waste that reaches
surface waters or wetlands resulting from a storm event more severe than a 25-year, 24-
hour storm, it will not be considered to be in violation of this Permit, as long as the
Facility is in compliance with its CAWMP and this Permit.
No discharge of waste shall result in a violation of the water quality standards established
for receiving waters as per Title 15A, Subchapter 2B, Section .0200 of the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the NCAC.
The facility's CAWMP is hereby incorporated by reference into this Permit. The
CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and standards
(federal, state and local) in effect at the time of siting, design, and certification of the
Facility.
4. Any proposed increase or modification to the annual average that exceeds the thresholds
set by North Carolina General Statues (NCGS) 143-215.10B(1) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and the Permit prior to modification of the Facility.

L
5. Animal waste shalt not be applied within one hundred (100) feet of any well, with the
exception of monitoring wells. The allowable distance to monitoring wells shall be
established on a case -by -case basis by the Division.
H. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application equipment and
fields shall be properly operated properly and maintained at all times.
2. A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the Facility's CAWMP on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste shall be
applied upon areas not included in the CAWMP.
3. Soil pH on all land application fields must be maintained in the optimum range for crop
production.
4. Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the receiving
crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff
during any given application event.
If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled, bare soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land. This
requirement does not apply to no -till fields, pastures, or fields where crops are actively
growing.
6. Pesticides, toxic chemicals, and petroleum products shall not be disposed of in the animal
waste management system.
7. Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be
discharged into the animal waste management system. Washdown of stock trailers
owned by and used to transport animals to and from the Facility only will be permissible
as long as the system has been evaluated and approved to accommodate the additional
volume. Only those cleaning agents and soaps that are EPA -approved according to their
labels, will not harm the cover crop, and will not contravene the groundwater standards
listed in 15A NCAC 2L may be utilized in the Facility covered by this Permit,
Instruction labels are to be followed when using cleaning agents and soaps.
8. Disposal of dead animals resulting from normal mortality rates associated with the
Facility shall be done in accordance with the Facility's CAWMP and the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary Division's
statutes and regulations.
9. Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the waste
lagoons/storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the
structures.
4

10. A protective, vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen
lagoon/storage pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping
elevation), berms, pipe runs, and diversions to surface waters or wetlands. Trees, shrubs,
and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/storage pond
embankments. All trees shall be removed in accordance with good engineering practices.
Lagoon/storage pond areas shall be accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
11. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed
in accordance with the CAWMP: When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary,
provisions must be taken to prevent damage to the lagoon dikes and liner.
12. Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to,
tires, bottles, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste.
13. The Facility must have at least one of the following items at all times: (a) adequate
animal waste application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other written agreement,
for the use of the necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a third party applicator
capable of providing adequate waste application.
14. No waste shall be applied in wind conditions that might reasonably be expected to cause
the mist to reach surface waters or wetlands.
15. The Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as specified in the
Facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage areas, and land application areas.
16. Waste shall not be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen, or snow
covered at the time of land application.
17. Land application of waste is prohibited during precipitation events. The Permittee shall
consider pending weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste.
Land application of waste shall cease within four (4) hours of the time that the National
Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning, or a Flood Watch
associated with a tropical system including a hurricane, tropical storm, or tropical
depression for the county in which the permitted facility is located. Watches and
warnings are posted on the National Weather Service's website located at:
w-".weather.Qov. More detailed website information can be found on Page 2 of this
Permit. Watch and warning information can also be obtained by calling the local
National Weather Service Office that serves the respective county, which can be found on
Page 2 of this Permit.
18. Land application activities shall cease on any application site that exceeds a Mehlich 3
Soil Test Index for Copper of greater than 3,000 (108 pounds per acre) or Zinc of greater
than 3,000 (213 pounds per acre).
19. Any major structural repairs to lagoons/storage ponds must have written documentation
from a technical specialist certifying proper design and installation. However, if a piece
of equipment is being replaced with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications,
no technical specialist approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the
gallons per minute (gpm) capacity is not being increased or decreased), etc.] unless the
replacement involves disturbing the lagoon/storage pond embankment.

N
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. An inspection of the animal waste collection, treatment, and storage structures, and
runoff control measures shall be conducted and documented at a frequency to insure
proper operation For example, lagoons/storage ponds, and other structures should be
inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or discharge.
2. Highly visible waste -level gauges shall be maintained to mark the level of waste in each
lagoon/storage pond that does not gravity feed through a free flowing transfer pipe into a
subsequent structure. The gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings. The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded
weekly on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
3. A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, phosphorus, copper, and
zinc, shall be conducted on each application field receiving animal waste at least once
every three (3) years.
4. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with recommended
laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall
include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc
Phosphorus Copper
5. The Permittee shall record all irrigation and land application event(s) including hydraulic
loading rates, nutrient loading rates and cropping information. The Permittee shall also
record removal of solids and document nutrient loading rates if disposed on -site or record
the off -site location(s). These records must be on forms supplied by, or approved by, the
Division.
6. If, for any reason, there is a discharge from the animal waste management system
(including the land application sites), to surface waters or wetlands, the Permittee is
required to make notification in accordance with Condition III. 10. The discharge
notification shall include the following information:
a. Description of the discharge: A description of the discharge including an estimate of
the volume discharged, a description of the flow path to the receiving surface waters
or wetlands and a site sketch showing the path of the waste. Also, an estimation of
the volume discharged.
b. Time of the discharge: The length of time of the discharge, including the exact dates
and times that it started and stopped, and if not stopped, the anticipated time the
discharge is expected to continue.
c. Cause of the discharge: A detailed statement of the cause of the discharge. If caused
by a precipitation event, detailed information from the on -site rain gauge concerning
the inches and duration of the precipitation event.
d. All steps being taken to reduce, stop and cleanup the discharge. All steps to be taken
to prevent future discharges from the same cause.
6

.if
e. Analysis of the waste: A copy of the last waste analysis conducted as required by
Condition III.4.
7. A copy of this Permit, the Facility's permit, certification fortes, lessee and landowner
agreements, the CAWMP, and copies of all records required by this Permit and the
Facility's CAWMP shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three (3) years.
Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the request from the Division, the
Permittee shall provide to the Division one (1) copy of all requested information and
reports related to the operation of the animal waste management system. Once received
by the Division, all such information and reports become public information, unless they
constitute confidential information under North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS) 132-
1.2, and shall be made available to the public by the Division as specified in Chapter 132
of the NCGS.
9. The Division may require any additional monitoring and reporting (including but not
limited to groundwater, surface water or wetland, waste, sludge, soil, lagoon/storage pond
levels and plant tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of
such waste upon the surface waters, groundwaters or.wetlands. Such monitoring,
including its scope, frequency, duration and any sampling, testing, and reporting systems,
shall meet all applicable Division requirements.
10. Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events:
Failure of any component of the animal waste management system resulting in a
discharge to ditches, surface waters, or wetlands.
b. Any failure of the waste treatment and disposal system that renders the facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating, or storing the waste and/or sludge.
C. A spill or discharge from a vehicle transporting waste or sludge to the land
application field which results in a discharge to ditches, surface waters, or wetlands
or an event that poses a serious threat to surface waters, wetlands, or human health
and safety.
d. Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat
to the environment or human safety or health.
e. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or equal
to that required in Condition V.2. of this Permit.
f. Failure to maintain waste level in a lagoon/storage pond below that of the designed
structural freeboard (twelve (12) inches from top of dam or as specified in
lagoon/storage pond design). Note that this notification is in addition to the report
required by Condition I11.1 O.e above.
7

V
g. An application of waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or
where runoff enters ditches, surface waters, or wetlands.
h. Any discharge to ditches, surface waters, or wetlands or any discharge that poses a
serious threat to the environment or human health or safety.
For any emergency which requires immediate reporting after normal business hours,
contact must be made with the Division of Emergency Management at 1-800-858-0368.
The Permittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate Division Regional Office
within five (5) calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report
shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to
ensure that the problem does not recur. In the event of storage capacity violations as
described in Condition Ili.l O.e, the written report shall outline the actions proposed to be
taken to restore compliance within thirty (30) calendar days. The requirement to file a
written report may not be waived by the Division Regional Office.
In the event the waste level in a lagoon/storage pond is found to be within the designed
structural freeboard, the Permittee shall file a written report to the appropriate Division
Regional Office within two (2) calendar days following first knowledge of the
occurrence. This report shall outline actions taken or proposed to be taken to reduce
waste levels below the designed structural freeboard within five (5) calendar days of first
knowledge of the occurrence.
1 1. In the event of a discharge of 1,000 gallons or more of animal waste to surface waters or
wetlands, the Pennittee must issue a press release to all print and electronic news media
that provide general coverage in the county in which the discharge occurred setting out
the details of the discharge. The press release must be issued within forty-eight (48)
hours after it is determined that the discharge has reached the surface waters or wetlands.
A copy of the press release and a list of the news media to which it was distributed must
be kept for at least one (1) year after the discharge and must be distributed to any person
upon request.
12. In the event of a discharge of 15,000 gallons or more of animal waste to surface waters or
wetlands, a public notice is required in addition to the press release described in
Condition Ili 15. The public notice must be placed in a newspaper having general
circulation in the county in which the discharge occurred and the county immediately
downstream within ten (10) days of the discharge. The notice shall be captioned
"NOTICE OF DISCHARGE OF ANIMAL WASTE". The minimum content of the
notice is the name of the facility, location of the discharge, estimated volume of waste
entering state waters, time and date discharge occurred, duration of the discharge,
identification water body that was discharged into including creek and river basin if
applicable, actions taken to prevent further discharge, and a facility contact person and
phone number. The owner or operator shall file a copy of the notice and proof of
publication with the Department within thirty (30) days after the notice is published.
Publication of a notice of discharge under this Condition is in addition to the requirement
to issue a press release under Condition III.11.

13. if a discharge of 1,000,000 gallons or more of animal waste reaches surface waters or
wetlands, the appropriate Division Regional Office must be contacted to determine in
what additional counties, if any, a public notice must be published. A copy of all public
notices and proof of publication must be sent to the Division within thirty (30) days after
the notice is published.
IV. INSPECTIONS AND ENTRY
1. The Permittee shall allow any authorized representative of Department, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law and in
accordance -with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity measures, to:
a. Enter the Permittee's premises where the regulated Facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this Permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this Permit;
c. Inspect, at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and
control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this Permit;
and,
d. Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring_ permit
compliance, any substances or parameters at any location.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
The issuance of this Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
compliance with all applicable surface water, wetlands, groundwater and air quality
standards or for damages to surface waters, wetlands or groundwaters resulting from the
animal operation.
2. The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
Facility's CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds
must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain a 25-year, 24-hour
storm event plus an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall
be no violation of this condition if: (a) there is a storm event more severe than a 25-year,
24-hour event, (b) the Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (c) there is at
least one (1) foot of structural freeboard.
3. Any containment basin, such as a lagoon or a storage pond, used for waste management
shall continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of this Permit until
properly closed. When the containment basin is properly closed in accordance with the
Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) North Carolina Standard for Closure of
Waste Impoundments, February 2005 or any subsequent amendment, the containment
basin shall not be subject to the requirements of this Permit. The Permittee must submit a
letter to the Division to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of
closure of all containment basins.

1
Closure shall also include a minimum of 24 hours pre -notification of the Division and
submittal of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to the
address identified on the form within fifteen (15) days of completion of closure.
4. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
agreements, which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation
of this Permit.
5. This Permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the Facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a Notification of Change of
Ownership form must be submitted to the Division, including documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials as may be appropriate.
6. The issuance of this Permit does not prohibit the Division from reopening and modifying
the Permit, revoking and reissuing the Permit, or terminating the Permit as allowed by the
appropriate laws, rules, and regulations.
7. The Groundwater Compliance Boundary is established by 15A NCAC 2L and 15A
NCAC 02T .0111(c), An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the Division
in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under the NCGS.
VI. PENALTIES
i. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this Permit; the Facility's
CAWMP; and/or applicable state law; may subject the Permittee to an enforcement
action by the Division including but not limited to the modification of the animal waste
management system, civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
2. The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this Permit. Any Permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of state law and is grounds for enforcement action;
for Permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of
Permit coverage renewal application.
I It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an enforcement action to claim that it would
have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain
compliance with the conditions of this Permit.
10

This Permit issued the 19th day of August, 2015.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
for S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G. , Director
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AWI640013
11

Rimmer, Jerry
From: Sara Burkhalter <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 10:21 AM
To: Rimmer, Jerry
Subject: NPDES permit AW1640013
Mr. Rimmer,
I am trying to determine the status of the subject permit for a property located in Nash County, pin number
289400265880U. The address is 5683 Taylors Gin Road, Castalia NC 27816. We are conducting a Phase i ESA on the
property and this permit was associated with Production Enterprises which was a former business of the property
owners. The business has not been in operation for 15 years and the owner has no records of the permit, any effluent
testing that may have been performed on the property (or effluent from his property) or any other documentation
indicating if the permit is active or expired. Any help you could provide would be appreciated,
Thank you,
Sara Burkhalter
Geologist/Environmental Project Manager
ALPHA ENVIRONMENTAL
PO BOX 2155
ASHEVILLE, NC 28802
828-398-2040 P
828-398-2041 F
1

Towell, Buster
From: Joshi, J.R.
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 7:28 AM
To: Towell, Buster
Subject: Permit renewal AW1640013
Attachments: AW1640013.pdf
Please find the application on the third page of this attachment. Or, they can simply say that the lagoons is still not
closed and would like the zero animal permit renewed until the lagoon is closed.
Thanks.
J. R. Joshi
DW,
dhul"o 1r/rR wo-l" Division of Water Resources
NCDENR/ WQ Regional Operations Section
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
[phone]; FAX [phone]
DISCLAIMER: All e-mails sent to and from this account are subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems_
Request far Renewal of Existing Individual State Non -Discharge Permit
Please do not leave any question unanswered.
I Facility Number.: or Permit Number:
2 Facility Name:
3 Landowner's name (must match die name on the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan):
4 Landowner's Mailing address:
City, State; Zip:
Telephone Number (include area code):
Email address (if applicable):
5 County where facility is located:
6 Farm Manager's name (if different from Landowner):
7 Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code):
8 Farm Manager's email address (if applicable):
9 Number and Type of Animals: (example: 2000 Feeder to Finish Swine)
Swine:
Confined Cattle:
Poultry with liquid waste system:
Other:
Submit a copy of the most recent Waste Utilization Plan with this application. The Waste Utilization Plan must be signed by
the owner and a technical specialist.
I attest that this. application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if
all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included,
this application package will be returned to me as incomplete. Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-
215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application may be subject to
civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation.
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a corporation
signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS
1636 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636
TELEPHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Request for Renewal - Individual 11,13.2014

KC-D NR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat' McCrory .. John E. Skvarla,
Governor Secretary
November 21, 2014
William Arthur Sullivan
Production Enterprise Inc. Farm
5683 Taylors Gin Rd
Castalia, NC 27816
Re: Renewal of the Expired pen -nit
Permit No.: AW1640013
Nash County
Dear William Arthur Sullivan:
Your facility was approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation Individual Non -
Discharge Permits, which expired on 4/30/2014. Our records indicate that the Division has not received a
completed renewal application fonn from your facility to date. In order to maintain coverage under the
current Permit, please complete one of the following actions:
10, Please indicate if your facility is depopulated and the lagoon(s) or storage.pond(s) at your facility
have been properly closed according to the NRCS standards. In that case, you may send us a request
to rescind this pcnnit by submittuig a completed and the permit is rescinded, A blank Lagoon &
Waste Storage Pond Closure Form can be found at: http://portal.ncdenr.orWWeb/wglaps/afo/rel2ort
11. Please submit a renewal application form that must be completed, signed and returned to DWR. The
application form for the State or NPDES individual Permit for Existing Operations can be found at:
htti)://i)ortal,nedepr.orgZweb/wimps/afo/apes. Please include two (2) copies of your most recent
Waste Utilization Plan along with the field maps, if your facility is still active.
12. If you are a cattle facility that has gone below the threshold animal numbers (< 100), you may request
the rescission of your permit provided if the average size of the confined cattle herd at the cattle
facility, calculated on an annual basis during the three years prior to the request for rescission, is less
than one hundred confined cattle.
Please submit the requested information within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter to the following
address:
NCDENR—DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number-. [phone]
Continued...
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone, 919-807-64641 Internet; httg:jLwww..nQdenr.g9vl
An Equal Opportunity 4 Affirmative Action Employer — Made In part by recycled paper

Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a permit within the time period specified may result in
a civil penalty., Operation' of your facility without coverage under a valid pein-ut would constitute a
violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could result hi assessments of civil.penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about this request, please feel free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations
Program staff at-919-807-6464,
Sincerely,
J. R. Joshi, Soil Scientist
Animal Feeding Operations and Ground
Water Protection Branch
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Unit Central Files - AWI640013

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment. and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
--....- ... .... -. _ ... -
Request for Renewal of Existing Individual State Nan -Discharge Permit
Please do not leave any question unanswered.
1 FacilityNumber,; CJ 13 or Permit Number: W 7 Oc t3
2 FacilityName:
3 Landowner's name (must match the name on the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan):
4 Landowner's Mailing address A v loy
City, State:_ 4 S �4 A , d/ _ Zip:
Telephone Number (include area code): �, 6"X — !V D 61 1_� 0 A�
Finail address (if applicable);,
5 County where facility is located:_ VV rIJ J7
6 Farm Manager's name (if different from Landowner); 6 r II a r 51, 1 ✓� r✓ �^
7 Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code);. — D
8 Farm Manager's email address (if applicable): Al
Number and Type of Animals: (example: 2000 Feeder to Finish Swine)
Swine:
Confined Cattle:
Poultry with liquid waste system:___.
Other:—�
Submit a copy of the most recent Waste Utilization Plan with this application. The Waste Utilization Plan must be signed by
the owner and a technical specialist.
I attest that this. application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if
all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included,
this application package will be returned to me as incomplete. Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-
215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application may be subject to
civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation.
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a corporation
signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: j L 4. I th A/1 A C H Title
nGOA "Z-
Signature: Date: 20 /1
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS
1636 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636
TELEPHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Request for Renewal - Individual 11.13.2014

kKo
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
03-18-2009
This plan has been prepared for:
PRODUCTION ENTERPRISES FARM
William Arthur Sullivan
5683 Taylors Gin Road
Castalia, NC 27816
252-459-5757
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
This plan has been developed by:
J. EDWARD LONG
NASH SWCD/NRCS
1006 EASTERN AVENUE
ROOM 107
NASHVILLE, NC 27856
252-459-4115
-7
1 pENR I DWO
Developer Signature TFCi1(1NSE
AQ111FFR-QR
dm
MAR =23 2109
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature Date
--------------------------............ ..------- ------ - ----- ................. ..................... ---------------------. --
131966 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-18-2009 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S 18
Layer Lagoon Liquid waste generated 0 gals/year by a 0 animal Layer Lagoon Liquid
operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180
days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
0
Incorporated
0
Injected
0
Irrigated
0
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
0
4169
-4,169
1,264,761
-1,264,761
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-.....------------------------------------------------------- ------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
131966 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-18-2009 Source Page Page 1 of 1

�J
r
Narrative
This plan is just for the maintenance of the lagoon. There are no animals on site and the owner states that
it will not go back into operation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131966 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-18-2009 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1888
Hyd. 1
2.78
2.78
N/A
Nason
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1888
Hyd. 2
2.58
2.58
NIA
Nason
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1888
Hyd. 3
2.67
2.67
NIA
Nason
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1888
Hyd. 4
2.13
2.13
NIA
Nason
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1888
Hyd. 5
1.71
1.71
NIA
Nason
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1888
Hyd. 6
1.26
1.26
NIA
Nason
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1888
Hyd. 7
1.10
1.10
NIA
Nason
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4,5 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1888
Hyd, 8
0,93
0,93
NIA
Nason
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
Small Grain Oversced
1.0 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 15.16 15.16
L1
Paleritipl,Leach ng
;: Technic6l Gtiidarrce
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
�- 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
131966 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/18/2009
PCS Page Page 1 of I
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products, _
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fcm
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(Ihs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1888
Hyd. 1
S18
Nason
2.78
2.78
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
*4h-9130
*225
0
0
Irrig.
225
68.26
0.00
189.76
0.00
1888
Hyd. I
S18
Nason
2.78
2.78
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
*9/15-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
15.17
0.00
42.17
0.00
1888
Hyd. 2
S18
Nason
2.58
2.58
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
*4/1-9/30
*225
0
0
Irrig.
225
68.26
0.00
176.11
0.00
1888
Hyd. 2
S18
Nason
2.58
2.581Small
Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
*9/t5-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
15.17
0.00
39.14
0.0
1888
Hyd. 3
S18
Nason
2.67
2.67
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
*4/1-9/30
*225
0
0
Irrig.
225
68.26
0.00
182.25
0.00
1888
Hyd. 3
S18
Nason
2.67
2.67
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
*9/15-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
15.17
0.00
40.50
0.00
1888
Hyd. 4
S18
kason
2.13
2.13
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
*4/1-9130
*225
0
0
Irrig.
225
68.26
0.00
145.39
0.00
1888
Hyd. 4
S18
kason
2.13
2.13
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
*9/15-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
15.17
0.00
32.31
0.00
1888
Hyd. 5
S18
ason
1.71
1.71
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
*4/1-9/30
*225
0
0
Irrig.
225
68.26
0.00
116.72
0.00
1888
Hyd. 5
S18
kason
1.71
1.71
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
*9/15-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
15.17
0.00
25.94
0.00
1888
Hyd. 6
S18
Nason
1.26
1.26
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
*4/1-9130
*225
0
0
Irrig.
225
68.26
O.00
86.01
0.00
1889
Hyd. 6
S18
Nason
1.26
1.26
ISmall Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
*9/15-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
15.17
0.00
19.11
0.00
1888
Hyd. 7
S18
Nason
1.10
1.10
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
*4/1-9/30
*225
0
0
Irrig.
225
68.26
0.00
75.09
0.00
1888
Hyd. 7
S18
Nason
1.10
1.10
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
*9/15-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
50
15.17
0.00
16.69
0.00
1888
Hyd. 8
S18
Nason
0.93
0.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
4.5 Tons
*4/1-9130
*225
0
0
Irrig.
225
68.26
0.00
63.48
0.00
1888
Hyd. 8
S18
anon
0.93
0.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
*9115-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50LI
5.1 7L
0.00
14.111
0.00
131966 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 1 of 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
1D
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
1. Method
Manure
PA
NutficMA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,264.76
`=-w "e
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
0.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
-1,264.76
Total Applied, tons
-
0,00
Total Produced, tons..
0.00
Balance, tons
a
0.00
Motes: 1 _ In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
131966 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 WUT Page Page 2 of 2
t-.

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. if
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1888
Hyd.I
Nason
0.40
1.0
1888
Hyd.2
Nason
0.40
1.0
1888
Hy& 3
Nason
0.40
1.0
1888
Hyd.4
Nason
0.40
1.0
1888
Hyd.5
Nason
0.40
1.0
1888
Hyd.6
Nason
0.40
1.0
1888
Hyd.7
Nason
0.40
1.0
1888
Hyd.8
Nason
0.40
1.0
131966 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/18/2009 IAF Page Page 1 of i

S
The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Layer Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
150
12.81
.00
.00
.00
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
25.62
.00
.00
.00
Soybean 40 bu
160
13.67
.00
.00
.OD
..................... ............. ---- ................... - ----- ------ .------ -----------------------
131966 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-18-2009 Sludge Page Page I of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. if the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storaize Capacity
Source Name
Layer Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
0
1
3
-3 l
1
4
-61
1
5
-92
1
6
-122
1
7
-153
1
8
-184
1
9
-214
1
10
-245
1
11
-275
1
12
-306
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------------------------------------------------------------- ---.............................. .------------ ........................................
131966 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-18-2009 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ---------------------------.------------- ..... ------------
131966 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 Specification Pape 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
-

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
131966 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/18/2009 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): Hyd. 1, Hyd. 2, Hyd. 3, Hyd. 4, Hyd. 5, Hyd. 6, Hyd. 7, Hyd.
8
Bermudagrass: Piedmont
Adaptation: Moderate to Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bulac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
Ib/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Winter -kill is a frequent problem in the Upper Piedmont; Coastal is not adapted there. Tifton 44 is the
most cold -hardy cultivar. Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult
your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): Hyd. 1, Hyd, 2, Hyd. 3, Hyd. 4, Hyd. 5, Hyd. 6, Hyd. 7, Hyd.
8
Small Grain: Piedmont
In the Piedmont, oats and barley should be planted from October 1-October 25; and rye from October
15-November 10. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding
rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 112 deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
.... ........ --------- ------------------ - -------...... ...................................... -
131966 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-18-2009 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 1

CONSERVATION PLAN MAP
Customer(s): WILLIAM A SULLIVAN
District: NASH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Legal Description: T-1888
Legend
T-1888
Roads
— Streams
Date: 3/17/2009
Field Office: NASHVILLE SERVICE CENTER
Agency NRCS
Assisted By: Long, John
State and County: NC, NASH
330 0 330 660 990 1,320
Feet

William Arthur Sullivan
Production Enterprises, Inc. Farm
5683 Taylors Gin Road
Castalia, NC 27816
Dear William Arthur Sullivan:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 1, 2005
1;��+hll� 'r,4t;1,11 r;r.�iilit;r;11 FN1� i
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWP64d013
Production Enterprises, Inc. Farm
Poultry Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Nash County
In accordance with your Notification of Change of Ownership received on December 22, 2004, we are
hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to William Arthur Sullivan,
authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application
system in accordance with General Permit AW.G300000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Production Enterprises, Inc. Farm, located in Nash County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than an annual average of 0 Layer poultry and the application to land as specified
in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWP640013 dated February 19, 1999. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay -careful attention to the record keeuinf?
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has.been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Nam" Carona i
atur";A
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAfmiaWe Action Employer— 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per MRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit alter the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office, The Regional Office Water
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA400000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Nash County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWP640013)
AFO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Division of Water Quality
August 7, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Hlee Yang
Production Enterprises, Inc.
5777 Taylors Gin Road
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
Subject: Notice of Violation
Reccomendtion To Enforce
Production Enterprises Inc.
COC AWP640013
Nash County
Dear Mr. Yang;
'&ILT?3'J
ovea
NCDE
NR.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF +�
ENVIRONMENT tm p11R41S {�
Itfk �`
,.DEµNR RALEIGH REGIONAL
On August 2, 2001, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted
an inspection at the subject poultry layer operation. The purpose of the inspection was to check
the freeboard of your waste lagoon. Ms. Ka Yang called the Raleigh Regional Office on July 30,
2001 and left a message on Mr. Towells voice mail stating that your facility had 14.5 inches of
available freeboard. On August 1, 2001 Mr. Towell returned the call to Ms. Ka Yang and she
stated that the freeboard was actually closer to 12 inches.
The inspection noted that land application activity had taken place earlier that morning and that
wastewater had run off of your spray field into a storm water diversion ditch that separates the
spray field and the waste lagoon. It was apparent that there had been quite a bit of run offrom the
field, though no wastewater was observed leaving the site. Mr. Towell informed you that this
wastewater should either be pumped back into the lagoon or back up to the higher areas of your
spray field to avoid any potential of an illegal discharge to adjacent surface waters.
The lagoon inspection noted that there was approximately 14 inches of freeboard, and there was
discussion as to how to best get your lagoon back into compliance with permit requirements of
19 inches.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycied110% post -consumer pape

Mr. Hlee Yang
Page 2
During a records check Mr. TowelI discovered that during the week of July 1, 2001 your
freeboard level was 17 inches and that on the week of July 16, 2001, your reported freeboard was
I6 inches. Neither of these freeboard violations had been reported to the Raleigh Regional
Office, and are considered to be violations of your Certificate of Coverage under General Permit
AWG1000000.
Please note that an earlier inspection in April of this year determined that your facility had 17.5
inches of freeboard and that our Office had also not been notified of the situation.
Violations of your COC and General Permit may be subject to civil penalties of up to $25,000.00
per day, per violation.
Currently you have submitted a Plan of Action (POA) for your facility which requires that your
freeboard be brought back into compliance within five days. With the receipt of this Notice
please also respond to the progress you have made thus far with your POA and explain
why your facility has had these problems with maintaining the required amount of freeboard in
your lagoon. If you have justification that these violations were caused by circumstances or
events beyond your control you should include them along with your written response within
fourteen days of receipt of this Notice. Your response will be reviewed and forwarded to the
Director for his review. In the lack of any such justification, the Director will proceed with the
enforcement action.
If you have any questions you should contact Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Nash County Health Department
Mr. Terry Best, Nash Soil & Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

OF WArFR Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q� QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Jn
y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
`+ Division of Water Quality
�l
w. January 9, 2003 1z:
CERTIFIED MAIL
I
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Production Enterprise Inc
Production Enterprise Inc
701 Burr St, Apt, 1
>c::)
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
'�
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage under the State Non -Discharge General Perniii..
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation General Permits. These permits expire on
April 30, 2003. The Division of Water Quality (Division) staff is currently in the process of renewing these permits and is scheduled
to have.the permit reissued by early April 2003. Once the permit is reissued, your facility would be eligible for continued coverage
under the reissued permit.
Although you have informed the Division previously that you are not currently operating your facility, the current permit issued to you
requires that the permit remain active until the animal waste management system (lagoons and/or waste ponds) are properly
permanently closed. Therefore, it will be necessary for you to submit the enclosed form.
The Division has published'a public notice regarding these renewed general permits. A copy of the draft animal waste
operation general permits and fact sheets are available at the website http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ndpu/
or by writing or calling:
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Telephone number: [phone], ext. 574 -
Enclosed you will find a Permit Coverage Renewal Application Form. The application form must be completed and returned within
60 days from receipt of this letter. You must include a copy of Your most recent Waste Utilization Plan with the application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the draft general permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please -'feel free to contact at
919-733-5083 extension.
Sincerely,
zde�l_
Kim H. Colson, P.E.
Cc: Nash Soil and Water Conservation District
@ aleigFRegional- 0ffiee,-Division•of-Water_QuaFi1yj
Permit File AWP640013
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
NCDENR
Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.usindpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department, of Environment
and - Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
NCDE NR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OP
ENVIRONMENTAND NATURAL RmsauRCE5
Division of Water Quality
January 6, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Hlee Yang
701 Burr Street
Apartment 1
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation To Enforce
Production Enterprises, Inc.
COC # AWP640013
Nash County
Dear Mr. Yang:
On December 30, 2002, Mr, Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office inspected the
subject abandoned poultry operation to perform a lagoon evaluation. The inspection revealed that
there was only 1 inch of available freeboard in the lagoon and the wastewater from the lagoon
was actually over -topping one low area of the dike wall.
The Division has spoken recently with rcpresentatives of Wachovia Bank and your attorney, Mr.
Larry Norman. Through these discussions it was determined that you are still the owner of the
facility know as Production Enterprises, Inc., and as such the Division of Water Quality
recognizes you as the responsible party in all matters pertaining to Permit AWP640013.
Currently this facility is in violation of several permit conditions which include the
aforementioned freeboard violation as well as failure to notify the Division when freeboard level
is exceeded.
Please note that these violations are subject to civil penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per day, per
violation, and in some cases up to $ 25,000.00 per day.
162E Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Hlee Yang
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office is considering an enforcement action against you for violations
of Permit AWP640013. If you have any such justification that these violations have ben caused
by events or circumstances beyond your control you should include them along with your written
response to this Notice. Your response will be reviewed by the Regional Supervisor and
forwarded to the Director for his attention. In the event there is no justification for the violations
the Director will proceed with the enforcement action.
You should make immediate arrangements to have someone begin to pump the lagoon in order to
prevent an illegal discharge. Please note that if the lagoon does discharge the Division will also
consider this as part of the enforcement action against you.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact Buster Towell'at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Nash County Health Department
Nash Soil & Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
1 Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James S. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 19, 1999
Hlee Yang
Production Enterprise Inc
5777 Taylors Gin Road
Castalia NC 27816
Dear Hlee Yang:
2 3 �rf;
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWP640013
Production Enterprise Inc
Poultry Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Nash County
In accordance with your application received on January 12, 1999, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Production Enterprise Inc, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with State
General Permit AWG300000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Production Enterprise Inc Farm, located in
Nash County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 68000 Layer and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and
injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWP640013
Production Enterprise Inc
Page 2
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely\,. ����•..�
Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Nash County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File -Central Files
Permit File-NDPU
�1

State of North Carolina RECEIVED
Department of Environment and Natural ReRlRur'17Y,;EC71dN
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form 'JAN 12 19og
(THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE ASAN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal WasU- em°�,rn g
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Production Enterprise Inc
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Production Enterprise Inc /
1.3 Mailing address: P Dr
City, State: IslrytIle NC Zip: �6 di
Telephone Number (include area code): 91 - 3
L4 County where facility is located: Nash
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Nashville -- Hw . 48 North to Matthews cross
rd. (approx. 8 miles and turn Rt. and go 0.5 mile and turn Rt. onto gravel road.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/76
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: �64 (county number); —13 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Poultry operation
Layer
68000- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of P,,;. I, T f P 1 No of A ' 1 T f C ttl K7^ ^f A„.,, 6
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
ype o ou try nuna s ype o a e
0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Turkey
No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 64 - 13

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 26.20 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 23.00
2.4 Number o lagoo / storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or O (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or O (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 64 -13

RECEWED
WATT -iL)jQ4ITYSPCTiON
Facility Number: 64 - 13
Facility Name: Production Enterprise Inc
4. APP "IANT'S CERTIFICATION: A1on-Dls-hurge peRritling
N_t� _ (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this app111c'ation for f'lDO(Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed b e and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not c m leted and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
packs wt retu to me as incomplete. J �j
Signatur Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
!l
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed'and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 64 - 13

REGFEIVED
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN WATER QUALITY SECTION
UAN i i999
Non -Discharge Permitting
Producer:
Location: PO BOX 669
NASHVILLE NC 27856
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Layer
Number of Animals: 68000.00 bird
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be 'land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the -fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
68000 bird x 25.373 tons waste/bird/year = 1725364 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
68000 bird x 0.084 lbs PAN/bird/year = 57.12 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

J
r
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
0.0
TIME
4600
1888
1
NNB
BH
4.0
200
23.0
I
APR-SEPT
1888 -1
END
SG 50 50 0.0 23.0 11150
I SEPT-MAR
I
TOTAL15750
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
IF12LD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
------
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or•silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. . You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 4

ti rs
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
50
1.0
BH
SG
BERMUDAGRASS - HAY
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
TONS
AC
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
**
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
23
5750
0
0
23
5750
* BALANCE
-38
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 3536 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 17680
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 58.9333333333 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 141.44 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
1888
1
NNB
BH
0.40
*1.00
1888
NNB
SG
0.40
*1.00
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update'of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation,,increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
S. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
G. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to marls the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five ( 5 ) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION F=AN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:PRODUCTION ENTERPRISES
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
(Please print)
Signature:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)J. Edward Long
Affiliation:Nash Soil and Water Conservation District Phone
No. 919-459-4115
Address (Agency): Room 107 Ag. Center Drive
Nashville NC 27856
Signature: 1 Date: / L/Z z//
Page: 11

44,
1W
�)dx
Ass"
you
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
................
IVAP7
qrR:
MEMO 24'
fl.
..... . . . . .
W'A�4 rr

UNITEV STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
NASI
Cif
SOIL LEGEND
Soil map symbol%and map unit names are alphabetiptl. The first letter,
always a capital. Is the initial letter of the awl name. The second
Istter is a small letter. The third letter, it used, is always a capital
' and indicates slope. Symbols without slope letters are time of
iniscellanaow areas or nearly level wile.
SYMBOL
NAME
AIA
Altavista sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded
AbA
Altavista-Udw isnd cowwlax. 0 to 3 percent slope
Aug
Autryville loamy sand. 0 to 6 parent slepsa
sb
Bibb krm, frequently flooded
BnB
Blanton foamy sand. 0 to 6 percent slopes
BOB
Bonnmu loamy sand, 0 to a percent SIOM
Co
Congaree fine sandy loam, trequendy flooded
OnA
Daft" k-" sand, 0 to 3 percent 8141001
Fes
Facerille loamy sand. 1 to 6 percent slopes
Ge6
GeorWille loam, 2 to 6 percent Ilopea
00C
Georgeville loner, 6 to 10 piwoont swea
Get:
Ggorgoville loam, 10 to 25 percent 9170e11
GgB
Georfllwille gravelly loam, 2 to 6 parant slopes
GCC
Gaorgeville firereih loam, 6 60 10 percent 5100ea
GgE
Goorgevitle gravelly loam, 10 t0 25 percent skilms
Gus
GeorgavilwUrban land mmplrs. 0 to 6 percent slaves
GOA
Goldsboro line sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
GrB
GdMW sandy loam. 2 to 6 percent OWN
Grc
Gritney sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent sin"
H@6
Helena coarse sandy loam, 2 to 6 WW" slopes
Me
Aleggett loom, frequently flooded
NsC
Nankin candy loam, 2 to 10 PWMM at*-
NnB
Nation loam, 2 to 6 percent alopn
NnC
Now loam, 6 to 10 percent skim
NoA
Norfolk loamy send. 0 m 2 percent slopes
Nos
Nos it loamy send, 2 to 6 percent skins
Mae
Not! k-Wedowee complaa, 2106 percent alo0es
NrS
Norfolk, Gwg Wlle, and Famine Iwis, 2 to B percent slopes
NuB
Norfolk -Urban land complex, 0 to 6 percent slopas
Re
Rains litre sandy loam,
Rb
ReirwUrtion land cempkur
To
TOmoday tine sandyloam
Ud
Udorthe its, loamy 1/
Ur
Urban land
Woo
Wedowee posse sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
WeC
Wedowee mane sandy loam, 6 to 10 Paroarrt SWM
Wh
Wahadkee loam, frequently flooded
WkA
Wiclumm Ilne nerdy losrn, 0 to 3 percent akfpp, rang 11c0ded
WoA
Worsham loam, 0 to 2 paroaM Ilene
1/ Each arm on" soil map aheets in acidtbon to b" idanbfied by the
symbol Ud an further identified with one of four tabels on Coe map, These
labels an Quarry Spwl, Borrow Pit Or BP, Landfill or LF, and Cut and Fill
Or CIF.

GeB°( 1y . + BtA ; ,, WkA
1321 �t ?,'' Wh . Mr x a f•„? I �iek r$ .J
r , �' + st 111 i x,• '+q
Ir � .r,�Yy��r.( t r1•k -� 'tom `y, ft ., r x';w� S a1�. NOB
a r, Ir �yi � • T..e' i'' .r,� L ,'� t .,r r'.
wt,
�'•:NrB•",f-1
f ,�.. r: •y r - i NrB
•G "=,p i ,�` �, 9.�}r,i'i�",� ^+k4 ,� NrB
NoB
+,� NrB , +;�,.i 4'4J •;+ �s+r d � '
i�,. I eE
GCB
A
Nre taO` q •Nre _ Ge } NrB
Ra y_�a '�5 "y r r '�3� 4 t Go 1 GeE
GeC tS }t l ,.,, y ? Ge 4 �t BB Q•.
f lGeB
]1i11 GeC
l (NrB
NrB . Ge6
Ge8 CO
Gee a
` [� +•'� �yrY v } ' GeE
r-•� � .� GeE- �'r �•,��
u GeCr , - Y �+ tn., NrB
web c i GeB' sh „ GeB xi t t r9 }
'} r6
00 e� • s
_ tee � ai ���� i xYi• j,•� � :r K'y �J._Y � -Y .�� j� � y ..� I710
HgB WeB i , C7 3 r, it x s i •
n • r•
NnS
wCe s`f .I:'}`e *r�� N, .1 7. L� IS � g 3M _ � � ••
wee � � *y • r ,* �';,�''
WoA t :T�i NrB if •. ..ir"
ft He 'vll ; " 4c �L' f •4 �} +^` YJh
/ 1EN.,
! Ge
'L wee
.�.� `�2l GeC � 1,�• ��� - `,%� + ,
Wh r r i r a a+'i' NnB
�, s -"xei ' y s:r tl +fiY ,.�C • r:y� y�' S.
H es �• � �i I .' Y� r "� i � tip- 'Y� • � y.`.
3' WeC J` - *` ' .ram + +y" '�".\ ' ,r`•
F ts' (iR
wee••
{Y Ile[3 B� v
+f. HeB
{y 7 Tr; sr
NPB GeC
eB NAB
ithewo GeB
a�rooda
tie f r WeC a ;iiy r8 `~ NOB
HeB' Negr` � L � { � �- ,� , -fir t • , ,' � r
�.• .•1 •a ` ".1{ ',.V�'e9 x,�' .A"r C7,s JAL
GeB• :�, �'
�`�. GoA
gip. yYe T}' iiQQ..� r , j�.r• i 1 f •.. T
�• ',' ' SL NrB ,� '�'�,1` �
^[yP qb' � i r �� 6 � •.G n6 a i:' �`y

..' Attachment B
Page 1 of 3
North Carolina Agricultural tstension Service
Agri -Waste Management
IXVES—Z C= YASTE SAM? r, , NAZ.T= AM r_itrrrr =ON
OF Ids APPI3CA=OH BATES
James C. Barkar*
I. SALE CaLLEL':IO I
A. Semi -Solid IAt lure
L. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of mg==* from
d.:Ucercat locations using uonmeca L' is collectors.
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of zw=e :tom undar :he =%==
avoid1mg_badding materials and using noameullic collectors.
B. Ugnid N8==P- Sl=-'
i. Under slotted-fl.00r pit
a. Exzend a 1/2" ao=nzallic conduit open on both ends into
Ma=L=e to pit floor.
b . Seal upper and of conduit (e.g.. by placing a :..hums over and
of conduit) mpping manure that bas entared lower and, remove
and empty slur_y into plastic bucket or zo=e allic container.
c. Take sabsamplas 4om 5 or more locations or at least 1 quart.
d. liiz and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
U. Exterior storage basin or rank
a. Hake sme msaure bas been well mized with a liquid maasue
ehopper-agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take subsaplss rf--= about 5 pit locations, from agitator pump
or froze msazurs spreader and place in a plan-c bucket.
* Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Depar=ent, Nor'.:h Carcliaa Snare Universirq, Raleigh, NC.

(; Y ,
.attachment B
Page 2 of 3
6
c. Xix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
L. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from i=-Iow pipe
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
U. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on and of 10-15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating sci or debris.
d. Submerge bottle within l' Of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
A. Broiler or Turkey Litter
L. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality,
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 Litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g., if 204 of litter of similar visual duality is
around feeders and watarers, take 1 subsample there and the
other 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
c. At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add
about 2-3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Mix, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.

Attachment 3
Page 3 of 3
.- II. SAHPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or.creat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or tram far_ro lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample 'container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
i. Ali. Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Whitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 - Vheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
U. Fisher Scientific Co.
3315 Winton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ph: [phone]
iv. NASCD
901 Janesville Avenue
Fort Atkinson, WI 53538
Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses 'are costly.
G. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Depar=ent of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Vaste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box Z7647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attm: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks gown on litter; etc.)
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P. K. Ca. Mg, Na,
S, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DH, So, Cd. Ni, Pb

PRODUCTION ENTERPRISES
Type of equipment ... Isuau Diesel Power Unit (t 70 hp) with Houle Chopper pump
and Cadman 3750 Hard Hose Reel
Travel Application Effective Effective Wetted Nozzle Operating
Speed Rate width length Diameter Diameter pressure
@Gun
3(ftlmin) .37(inlhr) 230 (ft) 1100 (ft) 330 (feet) 1.18 (in) 70 (psi)
Pattern
330Degrees

. • ��� Lam/
TRAVELING IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CALCULATIONS
TRAVELING IRRIGATION GUN APPLICATION RATE
I =((96.3*q)1(3.14*(.09*r)"2))*3601w
where,
I = approximate actual application rate (iph)
q = discharge (gpm)
r = wetted radius (ft)
w = portion of circle receiving water (degrees)
Application Rate = 0.37 inches per hour
TRAVELING IRRIGATION GUN APPLICATION AMOUNT
d = (1.605*q)1(I*s)
where,
d = gross application (in)
q = sprinkler discharge (gpm)
I = travel lane spacing (ft)
s = travel speed (fpm)
Total Application Amount = 0.57 inches
VELOCITY IN A PIPELINE
v = {0.408*q]!dA2
where,
v = velocity of water (fps)
q = flowrate (gpm)
d = inside diameter of pipe (in)
Velocity of Water = 2.78 feet per second
IF q = 245.00 gpm
r = 165.00 ft.
and w = 330.00 degrees
then I = 0.37 iph
IF q = 245.00 gpm
I = 1 230.00 ft
and s = 3.00 fpm
then d = 0.57 in
IF q = 245.00 gpm
and d = 6.00 in
then v = 2.78 fps

Arullnal Waste Management Plan' Cehy cation
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
xistin or New* or 'Expanded (Wease circle one)
General inf resat
Name of Farm; .��ctr E.�«arT Ices .�.ec. Facility No: 6 ►3
Owner(s) Name: Phone No: q19- y59- 21y3
Mailing Address: P 0. ,Do • 66 9 1VoasA,, / /V 8 6
Fami Location:
County Farm is located in:
Latitudeand Longitude: 36° _oy` / 9 " / -280 . Q0 41 26"
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): 4 .,fL of A/ati(u;ll g2n HWW 2- t"a a,t i11c& ,-Log Y4cls_ (5R/3/0)��gl�t�
(?aeration Doc iption,I
7: pe of Shine No. of Animals
3 Wean to Feeder
Z1 Feeder to Finish
3 Farrow to Wean
3 Farrow to Feeder
3 Farrow to Finish
Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
3 Layer 68�0 0 Q„ Q Dairy
0 Pullets 0 Beef
Other Tjpe of Livestock: Number of Animals*
Expanding Operaadan Only
Previous Design Capacity: Additional DestgnYCapacrty f
Tonal Design Ca acitt•.
x�u a
Acreage Available for Application: j 6.2 Required Acreage: Alo
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds : Total Capacity: 1 z l_l / 3 y z _ _ Cubic Feet qt3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or (:�R (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named' above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal .
waste from the Storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe titan the 25-year, 24-houc storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires %-ritten notification to DEW or a new certification (if the. approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land weer : Crene
Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
.i�•r ._ 1a��tn�r1.1947 1

T__nnical Specialist Certifi—.tion
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005. I•certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, S1, WUP, RC, I). the technical specialist should only certify pans for which they are technically
competent.
IL Certi; fication of Design
.A) Collection. Storage. Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
® Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
❑ New. ex�a0ded or retrof fled fAcij& (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Nance of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Term L. ha'if
Affiliation: N t�w�,L Re.so,4« i6RserV-_f d,' So-ru;
Address(Agency): fe, pr« kv/ C z7Y Phone No.: 9/ 9 _ y39- y//5
S i -,nature: -h Date: 12 / 2 / 97-- .I .
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): I. cd _aid _Lo^g
Affiliation: Nashso; 1
Address(Agency): 0 11r«e ka; e C z Phone No.: 91q- 9-vli3
Signature:j�/_ _Date: 12 - / 2 -9 7
C)
Check the appropriate box
lI Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots. .
ZI Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): \-r-
Affiliation: 5.1iAizr
Add ress(AQency):
Signature:.
No.:
CB/06 /q 2
AWC -- JadU2ry 1,1997 2

D). Al2p]jcation and Handli 2auiMU t
Check flee appropriate box
M Existing ozggpapding facility with existing waste ap licati-uio t 11 (WUP or I)
Animal wasse application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
jai w. expended, or existing facility without existing waste apl2lica.tion equipment for spray
irrigation. {I) --
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications bas been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
w without
spreading of using spray irrigation.� (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan. has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): s. 6iwac-d Lon, .
Affliation:NjA_ 5oi1 - t. -_-fir
No.:�c9-ys� - yrr,5
E)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control
Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects
have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): T Edwowd Lb,,.G
Affiliation: &i A so;l 4, wdtrw- Lga twftowk on. D:s L s-f
No.: 9/y - yfq -
42--/2-9
F) Written Notice of New or ExpaiRling Swine
The following signature block is onlc to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21,1996. if the facility was built before June 21,1996, when was it constructed or last expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street. or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in
compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106.805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Fame of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature Date:
AWC -- January 1,1997 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) fof la tlon. St rage, Treatment Installation
ew..=6ded or retrofirted facHity(SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have. been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Applicatj,Qn Site (NYUP)
Check the appropriate box
M The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Q Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has commined to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate
for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
O Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can riot be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):.gFdCw�
Affiliation: W ee
Address(Ageen�cy): R„•,. i07 A4 Ct�.fer Dr�y� MUJu;11G WC- X7Q4 _ Phone No.:91�-VSf -VIIs
Signature,-;—' Date: Jz -
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that 1(we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement
action from DEM. '
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Date:
Name of Alanager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AIVC -- January 1. 1997 4

C) Runoff Controls from Ey.pr'tr Lots (RC)
• Eacl itv with ex£e on `;�,:s
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
• in the plan.
,For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
•D) Agplication and Haudling Equipment JUstalfation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriate block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed ]easing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan'has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the
cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the
owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ J Edward
Affiliation:( ik -v;1 4 aWer
Address(Agen
Sianature: L
;,;e N&s,I j lfe j/C -L
No.: 9/9-_Yf5 /ins
Iz-1/-s 7
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:--.—
Signature: Date:
Tame of Alanager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, ec d AfortalltvIlavaggment I WUP, RC o
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
!tame of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:.t/o,jk so;/ 4-GJale. D,!Jfe.
Address(Agency):A^ 107 -4a ce,-A, &,',, .mac x7rsd Phone No.: 9/9- y3y- sells
Signature: Date:
4
A«'C'-= Ja uary 1. 1997

s v O'
• L t
eA5 s •, ' i Al
561
1004
1 e mr' 1 � isgi 6
L491 UAL
� / gyhif¢ Ook _ 1 7 1.Le4
w�
l3Q 1.e
1lP.L .7 i4p1 Arenran _ ..�_1 -7
Uu 1?11'\
� q
'\ \ Liu .n t• 9
/ \ Gideon •\ e
/ •�" � � n
/ `• I•w Canmunih"'
iml-
13
s�9z tCam' DMI` 7.0 k7
v144 1.590 I�
Gt�. o h a3 ' '�? 4
�sl / 7,p 1 i L Social Union 1a19 'a S
/ � � .�
UJU AU
� � r gUh•'- .� 142 iti� 5 � �42 I.a
PAS .! • • $I. Delight ,•,IA s a l� Hillardslon
7O LOUIS1aeG $e �• f p=inY�'~-' J - Ch: ' Am
Lm Lug
.W5 +.'.'8'fi,�•:ati Toy an +Jk4t Un' •`
ti 36.05' la3g ��, CASTAUA Store
2 titiAu LLLaLiu
1 e
(/ r
ku » I . � La11 Lanz , , s •R i �B e ' 1411 �? F I .
G Loni:aster\ Mollhews Liu _ .`I� .B • ILLO. •1S
p C rvcids Craaraadt PAS S4J4 LUZ u RED OAK
7 e V 1474 ao POP. 314
2 _ P:K la1P !e 1l2i 1Fr5 1in
L7.]
/ Lea Liu hO- 1i: L4ai Llia a.6 '7 Lt O'` T...r
Lppd Sultaty
^e s� I.. L.4 Store IAU
Branch LUL } 1 1!]t
`•Jy.." .
o /lap! ' a 71 :,, ^' 1421 LM L. Liu
r
+ [r rOai 1- -lap .9 IW� ltl) i — itl LM._i
/ 1 Edwards .� Lime 's + ,7 ` LIU
sel 1 Crurnoads ia9F v ZZQQ __•� r j.. 1 .l •9
Lap!
r / PeodtMee lalp Fiyl•/ <� i ?! ,r 1 � Lou rt
e L i,Q2tket 1!2l Lial h 13i \ L*J4
36`0a l
0' -�- L Ch. .v �a ' Corinth g \y
Pleasant GrmryL a..�� LOZ�
Nk �- 1414 Lug � Vnian Hill Cwk b 1gpZ _
r 1�.ip S '+' \ owchH�.e r Chp.
t.link LIM Sp LOAson
1�' C.
I= C..d• �\ NASHVILLE 'J : •x; S � 1L•
c ` \ ..
FOF. I077� ;!s 7�'�" {CIS 7.7
Aim LEE J.1 ,e :s• ry ! `a: e. '+ .b AS ' ��
� .
LAU IA LUI �1 4 r i liQk Molneyer el a ] I Y
1.
14 .4+. FAS we11
I a. �:: • ry
lips-9
11 / 'r ., I a .Y •tr .�173p.
. Ch /.•` .� s I SPRING HOPE > I:;;1 . .+ FA3 1 cs:.n .•�, r9 I J ffi '6 ��.= 19Q yy. 1e2L �.
/ J]li`•, op, 1,73a �' .4 ., '! I9n. 1 a1Pii e, Li L4pp t�+ iip2.7 LR4.
GF-
7�
/7 14 - 6 143, .. ,' .• R�r' LSLS�, ` * .? �R;r: 1901 I Sa 1ppl 11.-i y, u LTQ1 L o
17
.r� R A 1 7CA white 1y ea 6 "� °^ .a `� a � / o \ LQ
Ltd
1 �4to I
1.1 .� 1 la Oak, 3 f 4+ '•LP31-I tl •y ff s.,
l p
�} R3Z .6
9, LUL J
�1apA r 1PL4 LPJ.F e M ti
LULy
LV1 LL1I L!� 11a ;e •e „ e"2 a\ \ Liu ..
MA
6a w tih Crwsr ds .� J31i Q�, /�\ �� Crougrco.
d LtLI 'k'4 Tom"' 1 LL}4
731 1Fj1 1 '0 t . ,9 ^ ` ♦ 4 _.1 ell . j ,6 7 { 6 .
4 Tel BIZ ••, lEYi r �ti�
�? •?:Gold Valley ,�y. a 1.1 /' L�i9 LEap. a Ilsi
'e Cro oads r6 �fr. _ _- .i' i"3 7� .6 I �� 7a o I7 •o
41 _, ... 1971 1921 i iEi ,• 1717 P • h•'1735 1I In '.... i

THIS DESIGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE LAGOON (LAYER)
CLIENTS NAME __________________________> Production Enterprises
COUNTYNash County
TODAYS DATE ______________--_______--__> July 31, 1996
DISTANCE TO NEAREST NONFARM RESIDENCE _> 1000 FEET
NUMBER OF LAYERS ---____-------___-__> 68000
DEGREE OF ODOR CONTROL
(minimum 2.5 cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
(maximum 4.0 cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
NUMBER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION >
TOP LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
TOP WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL
NORMAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATION =_________>
SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION
LAGOON BOTTOM ELEVATION =-------------=>
Depth of Permanent Water 7.3
(minimum depth without sludge = 6 feet)
(minimum depth with sludge = 8 feet)
SIDE SLOPES
Permanent Volume Required 680000.0
Permanent Volume Provided 979295.6
ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE AREA IN SQUARE FEET>
(i.e. pumpout pond & other outside area)
LENGTH OF PUMPING CYCLE --------------=>
GALLONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY =-__>
EXCESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAPORATION =____>
25YR/24HR STORM RAINFALL =------------->
FREEBOARD
Temporary Storage Volume 241838.6
2.5
0.0 YEARS
517.0
FEET
287.0
FEET
41.9
FEET
0.0
FEET
34.6
FEET
f eet
2.5:1
cubic feet
cubic feet
0 SQUARE FEET
180 DAYS
0 GALLONS
7.7 INCHES
6.6 INCHES
1.0 FEET
cubic feet
Top of Dam Elevation = 44.5 feet
Inside Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
Length = 530.0 feet Width = 300.0 feet- )Scl,000 f+ 4 166�/0y,8 F,l
Begin Pumping Elevation = 42.9 feet
Stop Pumping Elevation = 41.9 feet

. 1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
68000 LAYERS X 4 POUNDS = 272000 lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 272000 lbs
2. SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates at the rate of 0.160 cu. ft. per year
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in layers.
Years of sludge accumulation in design? 0.0
Sludge Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
3. REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design for 2.5 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total Volume = (SSLW * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume = 680000.0 cubic feet
4. NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation .41.9 feet
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 34.6 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEPTH
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 7.3
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
517.0 287.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb =
480.5 250.5
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm) -
498.8 268.8
148379.0 (AREA OF TOP)
120365.2 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
134039.1 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU. YD. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
148379.0 5361.56.2 120365.2 1.217
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL = 979295.6 CU. FT.
VOLUME NEEDED = 680000.0 CU. FT.
THE SURFACE DIMENSIONS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
ARE 517.0 FEET LONG BY 287.0 FEET WIDE

5. DIKE
Place spoil as a continuous dike to elevation
6. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
44.5 feet.
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width
530.0 300.0 159000 square feet
Additional Drainage Area
0 square feet
TOTAL DA 159000 square feet
Pumping cycle to be 180 days.
6A. Volume of waste produced
Volume = 272000 SSLW * 0.008 gallon/lb. SSLW/day * 180 days
in the pumping cycle / 1.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 52363.6 cubic feet
6B. Volume of excess water.
This is the amount of excess water usage (see tech. guide 633-83)
Volume = 0 gallons/day * 180 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
6C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess rainfall (difference) = 7.7 inches
Volume = 7.7 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 102025.0 cubic feet
6D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 6.6 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 87450.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A. 52363.6 cubic feet
6B. 0.0 cubic feet
6C. 102025.0 cubic feet
6D. 87450.0 cubic feet
TOTAL TEMPORARY STORAGE 241838.6 cubic feet

7. DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRED (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
Depth required = Volume of temporary storage divided by surface
area of lagoon.
Depth required = 241839 cu. ft. / 148379 sq.
Depth required = 1.6 feet
Normal lagoon liquid elevation = 41.9 feet
Depth required = 1.6 feet
Freeboard = 1.0 feet
Top of Dam = 44.5 feet
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE DAM AT ELEVATION
ARE 530.0 FEET BY 300.0 FEET
B. SET BEGIN PUMPING ELEVATION
PUMPED STORAGE VOLUME
6A. 52363.6 cubic feet
613. 0.0.cubic feet
6C. 102025.0 cubic feet
TOTAL PUMPED VOLUME = 154388.6 cubic feet
Depth required = Volume of pumped storage divided by surface
area of lagoon at normal water level.
ft.
44.5
Depth required = 154388.6 cu. ft. / 148379 sq. ft.
Depth required = 1.0 feet
DESIGNED BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
DATE:

• L _ 1
5ii-4er 3.0 page i
1-�-r I- C. Ci ► t C-- -b 1 C, I--% iE 1-1 -iG C-- -r- P 1-
1 F,
iu,i5 t lroi.mty, Wc,i--ti-) C,4i-cad irna
CP4/ii/y/
is3 Hi Yii ELtY 1115i ANGLE COMEWIS:
2.30 52.5& 5M0 bV MO Itlit iin. 1GA. pine Nail base 6T tree
1.YV 44.6 Y3 146,00
6.46 44.1 111 113.0
1.5V 43.0 131 ia.UU
C.VV 46.5 !tl! i6 .UV
is,Vll 46.3 243 iii.&o
�,tlV 46./ 343 129.00
6.46 46.1 465 137.VV
6.20 46.3 M i4U.0
c.K 45.7 5c9 kMO
7.40 43.1 52I 145.0
i.t1U 44.5 504 i41.oct
C.iO 43.6 JUC 14i.00
6.40 45.7 343 i3t1.110
I.1V 45.4 544 M .UU
6.60 44.5 531 i3$.0V Top of ie inch discharge pipe out DT douse
6.50 46.0 4YC i5Y.O
1.50 45.0 462 lJ4.VV
1.1v 43.4 4bY 14Y.V11
1.40 45.i 4iE i4i.06
I.YV 44.6 457 i46.0
1.YV 44.6 473 i46,00
1.K 45.G 427 M .VV
1iY 44.6 446 6tf (i
7.20 45.3 434 06.0
b.1V 46.4 541 06.00
1.60 44.1 523 iYG.VV
6.211 44.3 441 i62.60
8 M 43.6 4i2 162.VV
ii,nu 43.Y 4ii 04.00
i.3V 44.2 4i3 ii4.0
p.4& 44,1 491 iYY.UV
tl.3V 44.e" 417 20i .VU
C.VV 44.3 45E C13.VV
i.0 44.3 431 Cih.Vll
8.0 44.5 3Y9 GiMo
5.00 44.5 36i 2H.00
8.00 44.5 323 224.00
1.60 44.1 Ctll 2C3.00
MO 44.5 223 CC3.Vi1
8.00 44.3 !!i Cii.VU
i.YV 44.6 YC a4.06
9.20 44.3 84 iIC.&H
I.YV 44.6 Y3 146.00
Y.6 43.3 i43 Gi6.00 MI1
2.3V 5V.V 60 M, iND TR

1 '
&H-Ger 3.0
Production Enterpris
Job Number .....
009
11`Yl11% 7%
PC. 11"1t
No . h Coord .
Y t.00rd .
C
52 . 00
-7 7 . i 0
3
ik,j/. 70
-45. !2
4
i 35.6/
-i`i.0
5
176. Bi
'-6C).OG
6
Pa
--i1G.!6
i
266.56
-E.k5). Cib
a
3 j. 7. i y
-340 .Oa
i i_1
3E5 .68
—4 J.6 . efts
ii
302.2
—4ai.6y
i c
r' /'i .50 0
-422.6,''
20
256 . 60
-.4 i 3. tint
r3J.
P/2.,3.3
--403. /'i
23
it3t1. 4b
""dUC:,. `7Y
2'Y
i L7.31
-35i . 64
30
'4,3 , t3 D
--4 i b . /0
.3i
-i 1 6 . 85
-466 . 65
32
i:59 . G6
-464 . 25
a3
- 2rr . as
-422.9.-D
.34
-24 4 5
-- 364 . i d.
,96
--E.5i i4.1
-3iC?.Oi3
37
-' 'I6.2%)
-.eb•i.lie
38
_ 22ii .36
-.23a ..g:1
35
-iYci. 7 C)
i`7'8 7C)
4Q
-i.52.077'
i6,9.�iy
4 i
-1 C?-7 . 6 1
- i 32 . 69
42
-35 . S6
'-65 . 53
4,9
i i . by
-83. 1 G
44
52. 1.«.i
._ //. i O
a
52. VLI
-! / . iO
Distance from last point to first P0.11"it........
V.E. TCet
Length CST path from first point LC., last
point.
J. /06.6 feet
'Total perimeter CST the boundary . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
I Vb..3 Tt-eV
Total area within the
boundary ............
i66, iOit..G So.TL.
Total area within the
bow-dary .................
d.t3 aC1"•05

Uii Yer i.il Page i Plotted UyliiA
rrC-dUCGiGn EitLerpr15 i
aCALL: i inch = ivO TEaeti S
� x
F1_UI a i
9
9
AS
c
i

11l1103
Producer: Production Enterprises
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out
the routine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine
waste management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance
is considered to be normal good care of the system. Good
maintenance adds to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and
side slopes: Fescue is
sh being establied on these areas. Beginning in 1998 and
each year thereafter, the embankment should be fertilized
with 800 pounds of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous
stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of
all three. This will need to be done at least once each
year and possibly twice in years favorable to heavy growth
of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the
initial filling of the lagoon and at least annually. Items to
be checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Overflow Pipes
a. condition of pipes
(1) separation of joints
(2) cracks or"breaks
2. Pool Area
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability - slumps or bulges
C. erosion and rodent damage
4. Transfer Pump
Producer: Production Enterprises
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out
the routine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine
waste management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance
is considered to be normal good care of the system. Good
maintenance adds to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and
side slopes: Fescue is
sh being establied on these areas. Beginning in 1998 and
each year thereafter, the embankment should be fertilized
with 800 pounds of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous
stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of
all three. This will need to be done at least once each
year and possibly twice in years favorable to heavy growth
of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the
initial filling of the lagoon and at least annually. Items to
be checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Overflow Pipes
a. condition of pipes
(1) separation of joints
(2) cracks or"breaks
2. Pool Area
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability - slumps or bulges
C. erosion and rodent damage
4. Transfer Pump

amm
B. Operation
Your animal waste management facility was designed for a total
of 68,000 caged layers. The lagoon contains both permanent
and temporary storage. The permanent storage is not to be
pumped in order to ensure that anaerobic action will occur. The
design includes permanent storage of two and one-half cubic foot
per pound of steady state live weight. '
The temporary storage portion of the lagoon includes capacity
for the volume of waste produced over 180 days, the amount of
rainfall in a 25 year 24 hour storm event, and rainfall in
excess of evaporation. Your facility is designed for 180 days
of temporary storage; therefore, it will need to be pumped
every six months. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level
reaches elevation -42.9_ as marked by permanent markers. Stop
pump -out when the fluid level reaches elevation _41.9_
The attached waste management plan should be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B)
before land application. The waste material should be analyzed
before each application cycle to determine its nutrient content.
A soil test of the area of application should be made annually
to insure the waste is applied as reasonably and practically
possible to recommended rates.
If this is a new lagoon, it is strongly recommended that the
treatment lagoon be pre -charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent
excessive odors during start-up. Pre -charging reduces the
concentration of the initial waste entering the lagoon thereby
reducing odors. Solids should be covered with effluent at all
times.
If this is an existing operation that is being brought up to
modern day standards and specifications, usually the lagoon will
not have adequate storage for sludge acclamation. It is
recommended that the lagoon is agitated and sludge land applied
in an environmentally safe mariner every _2-3 years.
The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of
Environmental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing
this law.
r 2

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specine Practices
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at a Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emissions; ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
Biological mixing;
+ Agitation
❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures;
❑ Minimum surface areo-to-volume ratio;
❑ Minimum agitation while pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation; 13 Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
nozzles • Wind drift ❑ Minimum recommended operating procedure;
O Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
Dead birds • Carcass decomposition ❑ Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead bird disposal pits • Carcass decomposition O. Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
0 Proper location/construction of disposal pits;
❑ Disposal pit covers tight fitting
Standing water around • Improper drainage; ❑ Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities . Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto public, • Poorly maintained access roads ❑ Farm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Information :
Available From :
Poultry Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet
NCSU, County Extension Center
Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Management: High Rise, Deep Pit ; EBAE 131-88
NCSU -BAE
Poultry Layer Production Facility Manure Management: Undercage Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 130-89
NCSU - BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU - BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU - BAE
Proper Disposal of Dead Poultry ; PS&T Guide No. 19
NCSU - Poultry Science
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies ; PRO]07, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 7
.1

. AP a
Poultry Layer Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Poultry production Vegetative or wooded buffers;
1
l�J Recommended best management practices;
C( Good judgment and common sense
Floor surfaces (walk • Wet dirty surfaces Ef Scrape manure, dust, feathers into collection
aisles)
/ alleys;
© Splash boards along upper ends of collection
alleys;
Proper ventilation
Cage manure dropping Manure -covered surfaces 0 Scrape manure into collection alleys
boards
Manure collection alleys • Partial microbial decomposition d1 Frequent manure removal by flush or scrape;
E3 Frequent checks and maintenance on waterers
and water pipes
Ventilation exhaust fans • Volatile gases; ❑ Fan maintenance;
Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces
• Dust
0,
acuum or washdown between flocks
Manure conveyors
• Partial microbial decomposition
Keep mechanical equipment in good repair,
Remove manure accumulations promptly
Storage tank or basin
• Partial microbial decomposition;
❑
Bottom or midlevel loading; `
surface
• Mixing while filling;
❑
Tank covers;
• Agitation when emptying
❑
Hasin surface mats of solids; ;.
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Manure slurry or sludge
• Agitation when spreading;
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets
. Volatile gas emissions
❑
Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
17 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure • Volatile gas emissions while ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
slurry or sludge on field drying
Cl Soil incorporation within 48hrs.
surfaces
Outside drain collection • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
or junction boxes conveyance
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 6

M
Insect'Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause UMI's to Coulral insects Site Specific i'raclices
- - - _ — Liquid Sysiews - —
Flilsh [iulters • Accumulation of
El Flush system is designed and operated
suflicienlly to remove accumulated solids from
gullers as designed.
Remove bridging of accumulated solids al
l.agoous and Pity Crusicd Solids if Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 inches over more titan 30% of surface
Excessive vegetative . Decaying vegelalion Mainlain vegetative control along hanks of
(ii-mvih lagoons and other Impotindments to prevent
accuuulation of decaying vegetative matter
along waters edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry systems
1 «Jct� Deed Spillage ET Design, operate and maintain feed syslents
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accunutialion of decaying wastage.
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - Ili
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during wittier).
Fecil Sturage . r Accuum
P% Reduce moisture accnnudalinn within and
around inuuediate peritncler of hxd storage
ureas by insuring dr iiiage away from site
aucUor providing adequate conlainntcnt (e.g.,
covered hill for brewers grain and similar high
14 moisture grain prothtcis).
Inspect liar all([ remove or break up accunitilaied
solids_in filter strips annual feed slurage as
uecded.
Y
AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page I

i
anti feed wastage
Source Cause 1 amps to Control Insects Site Specific Praclieck
Aniatu! Iloldin6 Areas
wastes 11 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
fences and Diller locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
I Maintain fence rows and filler strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for anti
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry Manure 1 handling • Accumulations of animal wastes- �Q Remove spillage on a routine basis (c , ] - 10
Spstenss day interval during summer, I5-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
!] Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
Cl Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
munure handling areas as needed.
For inure iniOnnalion contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Deparlmtnt of Entomology. Box 7613, North Carolina State; I Iniversily,
ltaleigit, NC, 27695-7613.
AhilC-.NijycnIhcr 11, 1996, Page 2

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
O� Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300.fect from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
D Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. '106-168.7
O/ Complete incineration
Q In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
D Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

t ''
•
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919-571- 4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 91.9-459- 7376
SWCD 919- 459-4115
NRCS 919 - 4 5 9- 4115
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.,
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. This elan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a.
Add
soil to berm to increase
elevation of'dam.
b.
Pump
wastes to fields at an acceptable
rate.
c.
Stop
all flows to the lagoon
immediately.
d.
Call
a pumping contractor.
e.
Make
sure no surface water is
entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
r c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that
caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields
where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.

r d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a: Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of
the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface
waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach
t surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off
of the property) ?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ
(Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone
919 571-4700. After hours, emergency number: 919-
733-3942. Your.phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of

• the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-459-7376.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-459-9810 , local SWCD
office phone number 919-459- 4114 and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919- 459- 4115.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
C. Contractors Phone.
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (NRCS, consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: NRCSISWCD
b. Phone : �919 Z 4,5 9 4115
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
da,� / �whhrwm«n o.a cplan.dca
..as is.ee

C, C
LW
I
36,10' W10'
im Mu U-2Z 1.4
A-1-
lop)
A,
IP
Gideon Uu
Lsp!
I*" Comm—ify
Ch. 1304
U
101IGL-4
RPrd
1121" L&2
—
Bid— 1]71 14
OP LIZ 43
L40 S-1.1 Wk. "Lilt
40.
112D
L401 $37,
.51 .51 .51
FAS D.figh, .51 IN
do —
TO LOUISjunG 1, "T 112 Hill-
✓Ch., k 3 101
Lm 1.4
. ...... Taylor. 'Jim LILL
A� WTALIA Slw.
POP.
1 0 14LL
141.9
U11 L . 417
b
Qllil
0 lim
a lima
1-11 Ji. .e10 1416
9k Cr~—ds C—mds ✓ #AS b RED OAK
POP. 314
LM 1.4
UU 30 1106 43
Im
Un .6
Y PAS
L4 F 4 UN JAM
U2
LAZZ j,.:,
..........
Lin 1,31
13 b . 1003 6 Im
/m.yold.
I L;u
Im Y Ligi
111-1 EdwardsLQP-4 L41Z L4]3
Ulk J U91
Lm
TIN 1.7 L"I tin % UdL,
36*00, 01 — vk ell— L-�y CP,riwh
1.3 nu LIU Pl--s Or Uni— Hill
WV 'o 5,.Pou s',,P Ch. 1 1134
0
M L3-U Chg. L,2.L
Pf 1 1004 14"
/� , ON LU2 .1, .
so.
Cr—rwd, 4AS ILL
3
LP9, 9-
9k
P1307 1301 Im
P,-, NV
122t jut M—.Y.r♦ AS
0100" edry
S V %J3
7_1
Lzm
ally Af.iF— .6
43A SPRING Ho LM Of LIM I I
PDT, 1,23 N1913
.3
X
1 0 LW 11 A
1W .9
1909
HAS
11_3l1
U—
ICA WhIto
\TrAA
-A
1.7 \\ c
1144 Kt ta
uu 1141 1147 "A U96 isw
64 n Lomirli 17.19 I.,—
1703 C-
731 •­3
;91R
10211 7
:Gold 175d
Aolley .6
c,m.md1 .6 IV 17ji
X. . 1.
M3 -19?j 173 b -,-,733

Form 618(Official Form 18)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
Eastern District of North Carolina
In Re:
-YANG, HLEE
701 BURR ST., APT. 1
SAINT PAUL, MN 55101
YANG, KA Z
701 BURR ST., APT. 1
SAINT PAUL, MN 55101
Social Security No(s).:
Debtor: 519-98-5979
Debtor
Joint: 471-94-0923
Case Number. 01-07558-8-JRL
Chapter. 7
DISCHARGE OF DEBTOR
It appearing that the debtor is entitled to a discharge,
IT IS ORDERED:
J.Y._
1
The debtor is granted a discharge under section 727 of title 11, United States
Code, (the Bankruptcy Code).
Dated: January 9, 2002
BY THE COURT
�5 Y-L
United States Bankruptcy Mudge
5
SEE BACK SIDE OF THIS ORDER FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Form 18 Continued
(9/97)
�Y
EXPLANATION OF BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE
IN A CHAPTER 7 CASE
This court odder grants a discharge to the person named as the debtor. It is not a dismissal of the case and
it does not determine how much money, if any, the trustee will pay to creditors.
Collection of Discharged Debts Prohibited
The discharge prohibits any attempt to collect from the debtor a debt that has been discharged. For
example, a creditor is not permitted to contact a debtor by [nail, phone, or otherwise, to file or continue a lawsuit, to
attach wages or other property, -or to take any other action to collect a discharged debt from the debtor. [In a case
involving community property:'] [There are also special rules that protect certain community property owned by the.
debtor's spouse, even if that spouse did not file a bankruptcy case.] A creditor who violates this order can be
required to pay damages and attorney's fees to the debtor.
However, a creditor may have the right to enforce a valid lien, such as a mortgage or security interest,
against the debtor's property after the bankruptcy, if that lien was not avoided or eliminated in the bankruptcy case.
Also, a debtor may voluntarily pay any debt that has been discharged.
Debts that are Discharged
The chapter 7 discharge order eliminates a debtor's legal obligation to pay a debt that is discharged. Most,
but not all, types of debts are discharged if the debt existed on the date the bankruptcy case was filed. (If this ease
was begun under a different chapter of the Bankruptcy Code and converted to chapter 7, the discharge applies to
debts owed when the bankruptcy case was converted.)
Debts that are Not Discharged
Some of the common types of debts which are not discharged in a chapter 7 bankruptcy case are:
a. Debts for most taxes;
b. Debts that are in the nature of alimony, maintenance, or support;
c. Debts for most student loans;
d. Debts for most fines, penalties, forfeitures, or criminal restitution obligations;
e. Debts for personal injuries or death caused by the debtor's operation of a motor vehicle while
intoxicated;
f. Some debts which were not properly listed by the debtor,
g. Debts that the bankruptcy court specifically has decided or will decide in this bankruptcy case art tioi
discharged;
h. Debts for which the debtor has given up the discharge protections by signing a reaffirmation agreement
in compliance with the Bankruptcy Code requirements for reaffirmation of debts.
This information is only a general summary of the bankruptcy discharge. There are exceptions to
these general rules. Because the law is complicated, you may want to consult an attorney to determine the
exact effect of the discharge in this case.
n-VI176 11009048273014

FRI-11009 0417-8 DIS-001 01-07558-8-JRL
Larry F. Norman
P. 0. Boa 566
L.ouisbutg, N 27549
OF CIAL BUSINESS
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE $300
CONTAINS NOTICE of a PROCEEDING
In the
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
04817ri6 48176 1 AT 0.269 27699 6 8 34360-49140
11111111111111111111111111111111
NCDENR
162B MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NO 27699-1628
PRESORTED
FIRST-CLASS MAIL
POSTAGE S FEES PAID
UNITED STATES COURTS
PERMIT NO. G-18
i
FIRST-CLASS.,
MAIL
1
.l

U.S.
CERTIFIED
Postal
Service
MAIL RECEIPT
(00111eStic
Marl
Only: No ifisurallce
coverage
Prc
ru
M
cc
u-I :.
.� MR HLEE YANG
0 523 LIONS CREEK DRIVE
o NOBLESVILLE INDIANA 46060
a R NOVINOI.NASH C0.116103.BT (REUND M-1129) k
� Pndc AWP640013 PROD.ENT,INC.; INSP:1213002
Ca
ru
C
C3
Iti
past
(Endo
rout ftMP a FM
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if apace permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
MR HLEE YANG
523 LIONS CREEK DRIVE
NOBLESVILLE INDIANA 46060
NOV/NOI,NASH C0.116103. BT (RET.2ND M=1129)
AWP640013 PROD.ENT,INC,; INSP:1213002
A. Signature
X ❑ Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by ( Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
❑ certified Mail ❑ Express Mall
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number — '�—.��02 �86Q -0006 5832 6362
(Transfer from service lab
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595•02•M-103e

"K, N "A" %I!
f
.
It
7,
"F
Vi
7t
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
0. Uffilpl 41tims,11," 2,Aand 3.-Also o'OffiPlete.". , Item t - If Restricted Delivery
a- Print yc�urname iiind 6ddrew on the reverse
so that we "can return the
6 Attach thli card to the back of the mail le6,
or on the front It space permits. I
1. Article Addressed to: i r
MR HLEE YANG
701 BURR STREET
APARTMENT# 1
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
NOVINOI,NASH CO:A16/033T
AWP640013 PROD. ENT, INC. INSP:1213010'2W—
C 0ON ON D1:LI
VCR Y Ti
Signatures
E3 jAd&eMM
Date of, 66 lQiy,�
_D� , 1-3 6iWaq addlim different from item 17 13 Yes
if YgES 't% deliverY address below:' 13 No
_�L
13 Certified Mail 13 Express Mall„ ­6 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise
13 Insured Mall 13 C.O.D.
Reshicted Delweryl ft" Fee)
C3 Yes,
_t4.!.
2. Article Number
11
77
r
--y
&
it
jZ
T, 7
vaaNas o.L NUnjaU
C111"111 0 -4 01 3-igvNn,
99auctaw ON AAD-1 aaAOW
R
83aN29 01 Ntin.Latj aIH DNVA
-0M
ViOS3NNIVI 'invd iNIVS
# 1N3h1'dVdV
133b1S dbnq I
ONVA 391H W4
0 ly Eh44 9000. 010hE 6604
?1313pt H
7 17,
r, Nil
boom
8Z91-669LZ ON HE
H31N9D RDIAIIgS -11
EIDIAJO -1VN01932I I
,k1FIvf16 Nuvm do
SEIDIMOSM -IV-dfljv
IN9KNOWIAN9 40 JLN21

Netcenter - Search Results
http://kevdb.infospace.com/—l—Z8GT ... 1ee&KCFG=us&qvref=netctr&ran=l 8955
Netscape
Find Anyone Instantly. Now Free! State jSelectAState
[First Name Last Name �� Search;
You are here: Home > People Finder > Phone & Address Search > Detail
Detail
TRY PUBLIC RECORDS!
Result 1 of 1 update/remove I ad li tin
Hlee Yang Send a Card
523 Lions Creek Dr Phone: [phone]
Noblesville, IN 46060
r
More for Hlee Yang:
• Map • Directions • Email Search • Find Neighbors -
Find Hlee yang at Classmates.com!
What's your dream Job? Find it here!
HI a yang Is In Our Database! Click -Here
• Businesses near Wee Yang
Restaurants
Automotive
Entertainment
Family
Medical
Retail & Community
All Categories...
• Noblesville Services
• Find a Gift for Hlee Yang
• Noblesville City Guide
Weather
Concerts
Schools & Colleaes
Iui^.•7 m
4AW
by
W.eEope=
Search
Easy Look -Up
First
Last
(Required)
��;Last�Kriawn Sfate6,Efi,,n
Search! V
se u in cs
Background Checks
1913
-.. - -
rsraTRsf
Phone Numbers
Address Locator
Public Records
People Finder
• Find High School
Friends!
• Autos: Find your next
New*,Used cart
• Horoscopes: What's
your sign?
1 of 2 1/29/03 1:51 PM

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
Alan W. Klimek,-P.E., Director
A 00
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OR
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL Rr-souRGFS
Division of Water Quality
January 6, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr:�Hlee dYa.ng
701 Burr Street
Apartment I
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation To Enforce
Production Enterprises, Inc.
COC # AWP64001-3
Nash County
Dear Mr. Yang:
On December 30, 2002, Mr. Buster TowelI of the Raleigh Regional Office inspected the
subject abandoned poultry operation to perform a lagoon evaluation. The inspection revealed that
there was only I inch of available freeboard in the lagoon and the wastewater from the lagoon
was actually over -topping one low area of the dike wall.
The Division has spoken recently with representatives of Wachovia Bank and ,your attorney,'Mr
:, I iwokr6,. :l�, �•w. �� .-�.s.•.
LarryNorman. Through these discussions xt�was deterAffied:that . 6.b are stillfthej, wner'of the.��
facility know as Production'Enterprises, Inc:, and as such'the Division of Water Quality
recognizes you as the responsible party in all matters pertaining to Permit AWP640013.
Currently this facility is in violation of several permit conditions which include the
aforementioned freeboard violation as well as failure to notify the Division when freeboard level
is exceeded.
Please note that these violations are subject to civil penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per day, per
violation, and in some cases up to'$ 25,000.00 per day.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5a",o recycled/l0% post -consumer paper

5 !,�
!f S.likF !
J
llEn: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
% 0 Complete items I 2, and 3. Also complete
A. Slgnsture ,
_
i Item 4 if Restricted Delivery t9 desired.
❑ Agent4
X
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
❑ Addressee
' so that we can Mum the card to you.
8, Received by ( Fh+rnad Name)
C. Date of Delivery
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the iront if space permits.
Ia dMtvery,adde:;s daww t fmm deco 17 ❑ Yes
c 1. Article Addressed to:YES,-enter
delivery address below: ❑ No
1
MR HLEE YANG I l fir_
701 BURR STREET
S 1 l,y
APARTMENT # 1 i
SAINTPAUL, MINNESOTA 55101M�c
-reTypa
NOV)NOLNASH CO.t:6I03.BT
❑ Certified Mail ❑ Fxpress Mail
AWP640013 PROD. ENT, INC. I NSP: 12130102MR —
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Ensured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Deii,,ry7 F-dre Fse) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number t5-7 1
n 1025as-02-M-ta35
4
Jlir�lFrfi J�11riffffl�rrlfrFf�Fr tlrlij,ff rf ij�lllf�
_
k
k
b3ON99 of Nanlau
"
tttibf`1a0=J 01 371ga Nn
ssaaa¢d ON 1in7 ❑arrow
aanH.ONVA
��,iiiti?n av,T[S/ZrINl
fn rra1GT FCJTO Tr%-
IONS
V1OS3NNiIN it iVd TNIVS
I. # 11 I3W1aVdV
133d13 :IHf19 LOL
DNWa 331H 21[N
i
TE45 EhZZ 5OOr 006E 6ba]
XZ91-669LZ DN I]'.1;
N<i.LN�:3 ;IJ[AN35 'll
i[: N_I30 -1vNOIDE121 I I
A,].[-]vno HgLVM d0 I
SA,)Nf10SHN IvIIfl.LVl
f ni"•i l Vlr 10)r1A nf'f an 1 KT:rr

[ENT OF ENVIRONMENT
kTURAL RESOURCES
OF WATER QUALITY
I REGIONAL OFFICE
L SERVICE CENTER
iH NC 27699-1628
7099 340D 0005 7743 5731
MR HLEE YANG
701 BURR STREET
APARTMENT# 1
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 5510V
Ir
WE TZ;i 7
RETURN TO SENDER
YANG 'HLEE
MOVED LEFT NO ADDRE55
--UNABLE TO FORWARD
RETURN To SENDER
"Z'z' •i'diiiIII11111111 lid) ills It
l-C) CIA-
❑ (gag apv awmoa peogmu -v
'G'0'0 0 pvq PaAnsul c]
esipueunmIN joi jdpoaU wmau C] pasIM608 0
pw ssejdxa 13 M P99400 0 i8*C0/9fv':00 HSVN'IONIAON
IOL99 VIOS:--'NNWJ 'invd iNIVS
133a1S ame 1,0L
5NVA 3E`IH
ON El :mopq -Wppe 4xwpp wuw's5.—'k;17 Ppo=PPV spov
sex LL WOO 'umied souds P. I1104 QL4 UO JO
'8091chlau otg ;o )peq otg ol pm sjLA LpeUV m
"I"41m ;Oempl ..o-u4wp%cw)A,.qPw4'm Ot PMO GtO Ur48J U90.." VA4 OS
Cl �119&mm otp uo slowppe pub
SUA)A 04*mo a
1410� ow -c PUB!Z
AH3A11:10 NO N01133-S SM, 3.131dVU0:)
' MI'l
mznm6lli'
F*zP Pik r Is
k'i!
z
M�g ; N
�;�`�.zi�Ll.,��,��,.L•r..ti.}r�
' ,7. -
M

OUC-01-01 12:54 PM Prodwavion1F_ntermrises 25Z 459 7994
Lprivs,i. c 6n - 1
3
5'7r7'7 c 10r 5►'ra j
7�11�
D,E,
E
De4r 51'r 6 r 07,orlon7,,,,
i� pcv) /s -�-v s b,-�- err ,�,�
a �ir7 A5 ii7� f
I� 169
1-3 19.3
1.2
Ve -rollo yl was i- �
-PreC 60ar �Or Y-h� 1a5 Weeks,
i
uS UPS Or 01,0095 least lein,�5
low,
47/
co.- fusiAN T �
�11j

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and -Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor }
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality
January 6, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Hlee Yang
701 Burr Street
Apartment 1
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation To Enforce
Production Enterprises, Inc.
COC # AWP640013
Nash County
Dear Mr. Yang:
NCDENR
NORTH GAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
On December 30, 2002, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office inspected the
subject abandoned poultry operation to perform a lagoon evaluation. The inspection revealed that
there was only 1 inch of available freeboard in the lagoon and the wastewater from the lagoon
was actually over -topping one low area of the dike wall.
The Division has spoken recently with representatives of Wachovia Bank and your attorney, Mr.
Larry Norman. Through these discussions it was determined that you are still the owner of the
facility know as Production Enterprises, Inc., and as such the Division of Water Quality
recognizes you as the responsible party in all matters pertaining to Permit AWP640013.
Currently this facility is in violation of several permit conditions which include the
aforementioned freeboard violation as well as failure to notify the Division when freeboard level
is exceeded.
Please note that these violations are subject to civil penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per day, per
violation, and in some cases up to $ 25,000.00 per day.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

May 20, 2001
NC DE NR
1 y
1628 Mail Service Centerl
Raleigh NC 27699-1628
_ �3' •L
Subject: Justification of Violations
^ rb Gar'
f_ ^ ti
Production Enterprises, Inc. Farm
1J�=
COCA WP 640013-
Nash
t,
Dear Sir or Madam:
'On Monday, May 14, 2001, I had received a letter regarding to the
inspection on April 30, 2001 by Mr. Buster Towell. During his inspection,
he states the following violations:
A) I did not. have the General permit on site
B) I did not have a waste analysis up to date
C) I failed to notify the Regional Office within 24 hours of
maintain the required freeboard level.
This is what I have in my record after the inspection was done.
A) The permit was found under all my records in with the inventory
sheet. It was at site but in the wrong file. Enclosed is the General
permit that was on the site during the inspection which I have
found at a -later time.
B) I did not start irrigating until the end of March. There is a copy
of the waste analysis which it was in before or after the 60 days.
Also thecopy of the IRR 1 during the year. 2001.
C) During the inspection, Mr. Buster Towell have stated that I have
a couple of months of missing free board records. This is
enclosed of my freeboard records that 1 have. I might of missed
couple weeks but not months. It might 6f been that during the
inspection it was over looked.
D) Failure to maintain the required freeboard within 24 hours.
Back in Z6C6 of January, my freeboard got to 12 inches. I had
called in Mr. Buster Towell came out to inspect it. He had told
me that I was okay. That is the reason why I did not called in.
Please note that the above information was justified under my best
acknowledgement. -Please let me know if there is anymore concerns or
questions.
Sincerely,
�L9
Ka Zang Yang

S
NORTH CAROLINA ;moo
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOUR
POULTRY WASTE OPERATION GENERAL PERMIT ImL
This permit shall be effective from the
Certificates of Coverage (COC) under this permit
and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
date of issuance until April 30, 2003.......HU ers -of'
shall comply with the following specified conditions
The animal waste collection, treatment, storage and application system permitted under
this permit shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to
prevent the discharge of pollutants to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of
waste at agronomic rates to terraces and grassed waterways is acceptable in accordance
with Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Standards. Facilities which are in
compliance with their CAWMP and this permit, which unintentionally discharge as a
result of a storm event greater than the 25-year, 24-hour storm, will not be considered to
be in violation of this permit.
2. The CAWMP is hereby incorporated by reference into this general permit. New or
expanding farms are required to be certified prior to the stocking of animals. The
CAWMP must be consistent wish all applicable statutes, rules and standards in effect at
the time of siting, design and certification of the facility. Any violation of the CAWMP
shall be considered a violation of this general permit and subject to enforcement actions.
A violation of the General Permit may result in the Permittee having to take immediate or
long term corrective action(s) as required by the Division of Water Quality. These
actions may include modifying the CAWMP, ceasing land application of waste, or
removing animals from the farm.
3. The facility may not be expa-f,1-!,4 above the capacity shown in the COC until a new COC
reflecting the expansion has been issued.
4. A copy of this General Permit, COC, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, and the CAWMP small be readily available at the farm (stored at places such
as the farm residence, office, outbuildings, etc.) where animal waste management
activities are being conducted for the life of this permit. These documents shall be kept
in good condition and records shall be maintained in an orderly fashion.
5. For all new and expanding operations, no collection or storage facilities may be
constructed in a 100-year flood plain.
II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
The collection, treatment, and storage. facilities, and land application equipment and fields
shall be maintained at all times and properly operated.

2. A vegetative cover shall be maintained on all Iand application fields and buffers in
accordance with the CAWMP. No waste may be applied upon fields not included in the
CAWMP.
3. Lime must be applied, as needed, to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop
production.
4. Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving crop or result
in runoff during any given application.
5. Application of animal waste onto land which is used to grow crops for direct human
consumption (e.g., strawberries, melons, lettuce, cabbage, apples, etc.) shall not occur
following the planting of the crop or at any time during the growing season, or in the case
of fruit bearing trees, following breaking dormancy. Application of animal wastes shall
not occur within 30 days of the harvesting of fiber and food crops for direct human
consumption that undergo further processing.
6. If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled bare soil, tpe waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on 'the land. This
requirement does not apply to no -till fields, pasture, or fields where crops are actively
growing.
7. Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be
discharged into the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and application system.
Washdown of stock trailers, owned by and used to transport animals to and from this
farm only, will be permissible as long as the system can accommodate the additional
volume. Only those detergents and disinfectants that are labeled by the manufacturer as
readily biodegradable may be utilized.
S. Disposal of dead animals shall be done in accordance with the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDACS) Veterinary Division's
regulations.
9. Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall 0A'verted away from the animal waste lagoons
and storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the
structures.
10. A protective vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all lagoon/storage
pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping elevation), berms,
pipe runs, and surface water diversions. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall
not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/waste storage pond- embankments. All trees shall
be removed in accordance with good engineering practices. Lagoon/waste storage pond
areas shall be accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
11. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon, the sludge must be managed in accordance
with a CAWMP. When removal of Mudge from the lagoon is necessary, provisions must
be taken to prevent damage to lagoon dikes and liners.
12. Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to,
tires, bottles, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste.

13. The facility must have one of the following items at all times (a) adequate animal waste
application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other written agreement, for the use of
the necessary equipment, (c) a contract with a third party applicator capable of providing
adequate waste application, or (d) a contract for the purchase of the equipment.
Equipment shall be capable of meeting permit condition 11(4).
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. An inspection of the waste collection, treatment, and storage structures and runoff control
measures shall be conducted at a frequency to insure proper operation but at least
monthly and after storm events. For example, lagoons, storage ponds, and other
structures should be inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or
discharge. Any major structural repairs (to lagoons or waste storage ponds) must have
written documentation from a technical specialist certifying proper design and
installation. However, if a piece of equipment is being replaced with a piece of
equipment of the identical specifications, no technical specialist approval is necessary
[i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the GPM capacity is not being increased or
decreased), etc.].
2. If not already installed at this facility, a waste -level gauge to monitor waste levels shall be
installed within 60 days of issuance of the COC under'this general permit. This gauge
shall have readily visible permanent markings indicating the maximum liquid level at the
top of the temporary liquid storage volume, minimum liquid level at the bottom of the
temporary liquid storage volume, top of the dam elevations. Where storage ponds are
utilized, only a gauge indicating the maximum liquid level at the top of the temporary
liquid storage volume and top of dam elevations need be installed. Caution must be taken
not to damage the integrity of ,^e liner when installing the gauge. Waste lagoon and
storage pond levels shall be recorded weekly on forms supplied or approved by the
DWQ. For level gauges already installed, the gauge shall have at a minimum: readily
visible permanent markings indicating the maximum liquid level at the top of the
temporary. liquid storage volume and minimum liquid level at the bottom of the
temporary liquid storage volume.
3. A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, copper, and zinc, shall be
conducted annually on each application field receiving animal waste. The results of these
tests shall be maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimiirri of three years and shall
be made available to the DWQ upon request.
4. An analysis of the animal waste ,;hall be conducted as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This
analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc
Phosphorous Copper
5. Records, including land application event(s) and removal of solids to an off -site
location(s) records, shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three years. These records shall be maintained on forms provided
or approved by the DWQ and shall be readily available for inspection.
M

6. Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as soon as
possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence
of any of the following events:
a. Failure of any component of the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system resulting in a discharge to surface waters.
b. Any failure of the animal waste treatment and disposal system that renders the facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the animal waste and/or sludge.
c. A spill or discharge from a vehicle transporting animal waste or sludge to the land
application field which results in, a discharge to surface waters or an event that poses
a serious threat to surface waters.
d. Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat to
the environment.
e. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage greater than or equal to that
required in Condition V (3) of this General Permit.
f. Overapplying animal waste either in excess of the limits set out in. the CAWMP or
where runoff enters surface waters.
g. Any discharge that bypasses a lagoon/storage pond resulting in a discharge to surface
waters or that poses a serious threat to the environment.
For any emergency which requires immediate reporting after normal business
hours, please contact the Division of Emergency Management at 1.800-858-0368.
The Permittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate DWQ Regional Office of
the occurrence within 5 calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This
report shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to
ensure that the problem does not recur. The requirement to file a written report may not
be waived by the DWQ Regional Office.
IV. INSPECTIONS
Any duly authorized officer, emplrjye: , or rep,esentative of the DWQ may, upon
presentation of credentials and in accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity
measures, enter and inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the collection,
treatment, storage and land application system at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect and obtain a copy of any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit; and may obtain samples
of the animal waste, groundwater, soil, plant tissue, or surface water.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The issuance of a COC under this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the
responsibility for damages to surface waters or ground waters resulting from the animal
operation.
2. The Permittee shall designate a certified animal waste management system operator to be
in charge (OIC) of the animal waste management system. The animal waste management
system shall be operated by the OIC or a person under the OIC's supervision.
4

3. The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds must not
exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm
event plus an additional 1 foot of structural freeboard. In addition to the above
requirements, for new and expanding farms with lagoon designs completed after
September 1, 1996, storage must also be provided for the heavy rainfall factor for lagoons
without an outside drainage area.
In the case of lagoons/storage ponds in series that are gravity fed, the 25-year, 24-hour
storm event and/or the heavy rainfall factor storage requirements for the system may be
designed into the lowest lagoon/storage pond in the system. However, adequate
freeboard must be designed into each of the upper lagoons/storage ponds to allow
sufficient storage to prevent the waste level from raising into the structural freeboard
while the storm water is draining into the lowest lagoon in the system. -
4. Should the DWQ have good reason to believe that any activities conducted pursuant to
this permit may cause or contribute any waste, directly or indirectly, to be intermixed
with the waters of the State, the DWQ may require any monitoring (including but not
limited to groundwater, surface water, animal waste, sludge, soil and plant tissue)
necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of such waste upon the
waters of the State. Such monitoring, including its scope, frequency, duration and any
sampling, testing, and reporting systems, shall meet all applicable Environmental
Management Commission requirements. "Good Reason" may be based on the findings of
a related Federal, State, Commission or DENR authorized study or report, or other
evidence showing that violations of State water quality standards or other applicable
environmental standards have occurred or may occur.
5. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit, the facility's
CAWMP and/or any COC issued under this permit may subject the Permittee to an
enforcement action by the DWQ in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes and
may include the requirement to obtain an individual non -discharge permit and/or the
modification of the animal waste management system
6. The issuance of a COC under this permit does not excuse the Permittee from the
obligation to comply with all applicable statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances (local,
state, and federal).
7. If animal production ceases, the Permittee shall close the lagoons/storage ponds in
accordance with Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) lagoon/storage pond
closure standards or develop .and implement an animal waste management plan in
accordance with NRCS standards. Closure shall also include notifying the DWQ and
submittal of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to DWQ-
Water Quality Section- Non -Discharge Branch within 15 days of completion of closure.
8. The annual permit fee shall be paid by the Permittee within thirty (30) days after being
billed by the Division. Failure to' pay the fee accordingly constitutes grounds for
revocation of the COC granting coverage under this General Permit.
9. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
agreements which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation of
the COC granting coverage under this General Permit.
5

10. This permit allows for the distribution of manure up to 4 cubic yards per visit to
individuals for personal use.
11. The Groundwater Compliance Boundary for the disposal system constructed after
December 31, 1983, is established at either (1) 250 feet from the waste structures and
from the waste disposal area, or (2) 50 feet within the property boundary, whichever is
closest to the waste structures and the waste disposal area. If this facility was constructed
prior to December 31, 1983, the Compliance Boundary is established at either (1) 500
feet from the waste disposal area, or (2) at the property boundary, whichever is closest to
the waste disposal area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond
the Compliance Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the
Division in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under the North Carolina
General Statutes.
This General Permit issued the eighteenth day of May, 1998.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Poultry Waste General Permit Number AWG300000
0

NCDA Afflvacmic
Division 412LReek Creels Rail RaWith, MC 27607-6465
(919) 73*2655
Report
No: W08554 W
Groawr: Production Enterprises
Copies TO:
cmayang
5777 Taoors Gin Rd.
CastABA, NC -7816
Analysis Rqhort
aste
Faun: 64-,3"
5/10/01
Nash County
sample info.
LAXWatory Results
per million unless otherwisemLefi,
Sample I&
N
P K Ca Mg
S Fe Mn zn
Cu
B
Mo C1 C
Total 440
35.7 1177 162 82-2
37.3 3.15 0.28 OM
0.34
1.40
IN -N
Waste code.-
-N114
AI-P
403
Na Ni Cd A
Al tie u PH
SS
CN
DM% Crn 2iLE(x gao
224
7.53
Description:
OR-N
P(Adiry Ubjmn Ligkiki
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First CM
lbs/1000 allons
Other Elements
MS/I
Ap#ication Metbod
N P205 K20
Ca Mg S Fe Mn
Z71 Cu B Mo d
Na
M Cd
Al Se U
Irrigation
LS 0.48 9.4
0." 0.48 0.22 0.02 T
0.01 T 0.01
L9

Form IRR-1 Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Field Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner Facility Number�--�_--
Spreader Operator i " L-
Tract #
Field #
Date
(mmldd/yr)
Crop Type
Field Size
(acres)
Irrigation Time
Number of
Sprinklers Operating
/ - .
Start Time
4,77
End Time
'SAS
EitalMinutes
.2 A
/
# ,�-✓
/ 7/
ySF�
F 'moo
//S
91,
a . /
�Otm
tdlt5
67
.1,-7
,t
S-
D: r»
r
2
0
P
/S
Zf J
'r

12-27-99
1-2-00
20
1-3-00
1-9-00
-20
1-10-00
1-16-00
18.5
1-17-00
1-23-00
18.5
1-24-00
1-30-00
16.5
1-31-00
2-6-00
14.5
2-7-00
2-13-00
14.5
2-14-00
2-20-00
13.5
2-21-00
2-27-00
115
2-28-00
3-5-00
16.5
3-6-00
3-12-00
18
3-13-00
3-19-00 -
-20
3-20-00
3-26-00
20.5
3-27-00
4-2-00
4-3-00
4-9-00
21
4-10-00
4-16-00
23
4-17-00
4-23-00
21
4-24-00
4-30-00
22
5-1-00
'5-7-00
20.5
5-8-00
5-14-00
24.5
5-15-00
5-21-00
25
5-22-00
5-28-00
.25
5-29-00
6-4-00
23
6-5-00
6-11-00
23
6-12-00
6-18-00
26
6-19-00
6-25-00
25
6-26-00
7-2-00
26
7-3-00
7-9-00
28
7-10-00
7-16-00
28
7-17-00
7-23-00
29.5

7-24-00
7-30-00
26.5
7-31-00
8-6-00
24.5
8-7-00
8-13-00
23
8-14-00
8-20-00
23
8-21-00
8-27-00
23
8-28-00
9-3-00
26.5
9-4-00
9-10-00
21
9-11-00
9-17-00
23
9-18-00
9-2+00
24.5
9-25-00
10-1-00
22.5
10-2-00
10-8-00
22
10-9-00
10-15-00
25
10-16-00
10-22-00
26
10-23-00
10-29-00
27
10-30-00
11-5-00
27.5
11-6-00
11-12-00
27
11-13-00
11-19-00
27.5
11-20-00
11-26-00
27.5
11-27-00
12-3-00 .
1z 4-00
12-10-00
25
12-11-00
12-17-00
12-18-00
12-24-00
23.5
12-25-00
12-31-00
23
1-1-01
1-7-01
23
1-8-01
1-14-01
23
1-15-01
1-21-01
22
1-22-01
1-28-01
1-29-01
2-4-01
22
2-5-01
2-11-01
22
2-12-01
2-18-01
21

2-19-01 '
2-25-01
- -
2-26-01
3-4-01
18
3-5-01
3-11-01
_
17
3-12-0i '
F-J3719-01
3-18-01
17
:
3-25-01
18
3-26-01
4-1-01
16
4-2-01
4-8-01
14
4-9-01
4-15-01
_
14.5--
4-16-01
4-22-01
16
4-23-01
4-29-01
16.5_
4-30-01
_ 5-6-01
- -
5-7-01
5-13-01
�17.5
G
-

64-13
Subject: 64-13
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 09:45:47 -0500
From: Sonya Avant <[e-mail]>
To: "Charles A. Alvarez" <Charles. Alvarez@ncmail. net>
Charles,
Do you know the owners for facility 6� ;;T ?,7 Apparently from a letter
sent to Sue Homewood Production Enterprises no longer owns the farm. It
has been sold to Hlee and Ka Yang. Can you hunt this down and send them
a change of ownership form. We need the current owner of this farm for
our records.
Thanks,
Sonya
1 of 1 3/16/00 5:08 PM

SOILS MAP
Customer(s); WiLLIAM A SULLIVAN
District; NASH SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Legal Description: T-1888
Sails Map
p NnB
NnC
�W
® Wh
Tract Boundaries
Date: 3117/2009
Field Office: NASHVILLE SERVICE CENTER
Agency: NRCS
Assisted By: Long, John
State and County: NC, NASH
330 0 330 660 990 1,320
Feet

.s .}ice. `1•_ •ih... �Y .y.�{
Irk
I - NlATC'�_ U NF `'EE
71
04
viov
=JIL
- ' - _ aOv r• •,r . ^�`' .`.'. •' r1r�, �+ -lei..•• I�c ;i�-C�1,1 `Y s •;�:
J. • .. \` �` �^ • ; • • ..� it Y; A l = . '�., �~ f. S �'••
84K A.
4,77 A ` X� ` q� . J
PG 241 :... r ,.: �',� i
� �\-'.,v,. i��� 7. •�.'!''. i;+�.} - •. -� +•'S'`,�� '.v, �� •fir
AL
• -^r. - 4 •r �� �•` ,� « t "+i 'h+fir • y� . r + � a
4 xt T. .�
IlL
40.. �.. .+" • > jay
ly
jo
bl SY '•�� Lottv
• :r i

A
Map Unit Text
Nash County, North Carolina
Map unit: NnB - Nason loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Text kindtCategory: Nontechnical descriptionlCropland
p tobacco, and corn The hazard of erosion is the main' limitation affecting
cropland. Planting winter cover crops and managing crops residue help to control runoff and erosion and maintain filth. Conservation
practices, such as no -till planting, striperopping, crop rotations, contour farming, held borders;grassed waterways, and terraces and
diversions, can also help to conserve water and control erosion.
Text kindtCategory: Nontechnical description/Map Unit Description
These gently sloping, deep, well drained soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum from Carolina slates and other fine grained rocks.
They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink -swell potential is moderate. Soft bedrock is within
a depth of 40 to 60 inches. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
Text kindtCategory: Nontechnical description/Woodland
In wooded areas, this soil is managed primarily for lob lolly pine. Competition from undesirable plant species and the high content of clay in
the upper 10 inches of the soil are the main limitations affecting woodland. Intensive site preparation, such as chopping, burning, and
applying herbicides, helps to control the competition from undesirable plant species.. Unsurfaced roads may be impassable during wet
periods because of the high content, of clay in, the upper. 10 inches of the soil, Logging during the dherperiods helps to prevent rutting of the
surface layer and passible mot damage from compaction.
Map unit: NnC - Nason loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Text kind/Category: Nontechnical descriptlonlCropland
In.cultivated areas of this Nason soil„ the major crops are soybeans and com. The slope and:the hazard of erosion are the main limitations
affecting cropland. Planting' winter cover crops and managing crop residue help to control runoff and erosion and maintain tilth. Conservation
practices, such as no -till planting, striperopping, crop rotations, contour farming, field borders, grassed waterways, end terraces and
diversions, can also help to conserve water and control erosion.
Text kind/Category: Nontechnical description/Map Unit Description
These strongly sloping, deep, well drained soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum from Carolina slates and other fine grained rocks.
They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink -swell potential is moderate. Soft bedrock is within
a depth of 40 to 60 inches. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
Text kind/Category: Nontechnical descriptionlWoodland
g p y
In wooded areas,this soil Is managed nmen! farloblolly pine. Cdrnpetition from undesirable. plant species and the high_ content of clay in
the upper 10 inches of the soil are the main limitations affecting woodland. Intensive site preparation, such as chopping,: burning, and
applying herbicides, helps to control the competition from undesirable plant species. Unsurfaced roads may be impassable during wet
periods because of the high content of clay in the upper 10 inches of the soil, Logging during the drier periods helps to preventrutting of the
surface layer and possible root damage from compaction.
Map unit: W- Water
Toxt kindlCategory: Nontechnical description/Map Unit Description
Water
USDA Natural Resources Tabular Data Version: 8
Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date: 12/21/2007
Page 1 of 2

Map Unit Text
Nash County, North Carolina
Map unit: Wh - Wehadkee loam, frequently flooded
Text klndlCategory: Nontechnical description/Cropland.
The hazard of flooding and the high: water table are the main limitations effecting croplendin areas'of the Wehadkee soils.. A lack of suitable
outlets may restrict the use of artificial drainage systems.
Text kind/Category: Nontechnical description/Map Unit Description
These nearly level, very deep, poorly drained soils are on flood plains. They formed in loamy alluvial deposits. They have a loamy surface
layer and subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink -swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is within a depth of 1.0 foot. These
soils are subject to frequent flooding.
Text klndlCategory: Nontechnical descriptlonMoodland
In wooded areas, these soils are prtmanii unmanaged. Tho hazard of flooding, the high water. table, competition from undesirable plant' -
species, and a hazard.of windthrow era the main limitations affecting woodland. The use of equipment may be restricted to periods when the
burning, and bedding, can help y g g y such d chopping,
soils � d The lack of suitable outlets establish seeiflitn s rict traduce the seedling mhe use of artificial ortality ortalit nage systems.,,
reduce ilia comIntensivasite petition from undesirable plant
species. Thinning stands carefully, avoiding damage to surficial root systems, and, periodically removing windthrown trees may needed.
USDA Natural Resources Tabular Data Version: 13
Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date: 12/21/2007
Page 2 of 2

Attachment B
Page 1 of 3
North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service
Agri -Waste Management
3i^IcgmlMid AgrlvJtudu8=rA8 MrtS Cavlvu5tmellxersuy
LI4FSM= T&= SAZM r., Al4TdTT= = ULCUL4 0S
OF IA AP?.rZCA=03 BATFS
.lames C. Barkar*
1. SAMFLE CCLLEL"' 08
A. Semi -Solid Lot Ha=e
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of mare mom
d:-�Fferear locations using nonmetallic collectors.
L.L. From szozage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of mazuue -from under .:he su=face crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nor=sullic collectors.
B . Liquid Same Situ-;
i. Under-slottad-floor pit
a. Extend a 1/20 nammezallic conduit open an bosh ands into
manure to pit floor.
b. Seal upper and of conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over and
of candW t) =upping manure thaz has enured lower and, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucka.z or noamezallic container.
c. Take subsamples -from 5 or snore locations or az leazz 1 quart.
d. Ifix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Extarior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure manure has been well mired with a liquid manure
chopper-agizaror pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take suhsamples from. about 5 pit locations, f`cm agitator pump
or :roe manure spreader and place in a plastic bucket.
Professor and Z=ension Specialist, Biological and Agric-sltmsral Engineering
npo,ar-neat_ Nor-h Catalina S=mr-a Universi_v_ Raleizh. NC.

r
Attachment B
Page 2 of 3
c. Mix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
i. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on and of 10-15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle within l' of liquid surface.
a. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
L. House litter f
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, a.g.,
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g., if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers, take 1 subsample there and zhe
other 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
c. At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add
about 2-3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
U. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Kim, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.

r
Attachment B
Page 3 of 3
- II. SA LE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or.treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer_ro lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
L. A&L Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Whitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 STheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co. iv. NASCO
3313 STinton Road 901 Janesville Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fort Atkinson, 71 53538
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses rare costly.
G. The NCDA provides this service for Forth Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Canter
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attu: Dr. Bay Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
. iii. .Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing: turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on litter; etc.)
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P, R, Ca, Mg. Na,
S, Fe, Hn. Zn, Ca, B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM. No, Cd, Ni. Pb

6y-13
e-W V-
BRASWELL MILLING COMPANY
P.O. BOX 669 • NASHVILLE. NORTH GAROUNA 27856 - PHONE [phone]
April 23, 1997
ppR 2
Kenneth SchusterALE16
Regional Supervisor L�]"tE'VOWLOFFIC�
Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Dear Mr. Schuster:
In response to your "NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY" letter dated April 8, 1997,
concerning Facility # 64 - 13, we would like to update you on action to
correct stated deficiencies.
Mr. Robert Sykes, our Waste Management Operator, has taken corrective
action to prevent any wastewater from puddling in the diversion ditch.
The low spots where puddling occured have been eliminated; this should
prevent a simular problem from occuring in the future. We have now
completed sprigging of Coastal Bermuda grass on the entire spray field,
and as soon as the grass establishes a cover, we believe that will also
provide additional protection from run-off problems.
As weather permits we are continuing to pump our lagoon in order to reach
the required freeboard of 24 inches. We are currently at about 20 inches
freeboard.
Plans and contracts are now being made to install a solid set irrigation
system. This system should be in place within 6 months.
We are continuing to work with Mr. Shelton Balser to complete our Waste
Management Program and feel confident that we will be in compliance by
your deadline of December 31, 1997.
If we can be of further assistance, please advise. It is our desire to
cooperate with you fully regarding this matter.
Si cer ly,
Bob Pike, General Manager

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ` •
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor [DaHNFR
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
Production Enterprise Inc
PO Box 669
Nashville NC 27856
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Production Enterprise Inc
Facility ID #: 64-13
Nash County
Dear Farm Owner:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
inquires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Bang Huneycutt at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
/qet" OU�
FOR Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System �' Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
N%4ftAn
Operators Certification Commission Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 T 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Production Enterprise Inc
Production Enterprise Inc
5777 Taylors Gin Road
Castalia NC 27816
Dear Production Enterprise Inc:
e��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 19991 t
I JAN
RALEI
GH RIG1014 OFL
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 6443,
.Nash.County.
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for ieview. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Plan of Action for High Freeboard
Minimum/Required Elements
NCDENK
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Note: A separate Plan of Action is required for each facility number and this number
should be indicated on the plan. Facilities with multiple lagoons are to be treated
as one site since they utilize a single waste plan. Current lagoon freeboard
level(s) for entire site as of the date of submittal should be indicated.
1) Earliest possible date to begin applying
2) Once application begins — projected # days required to gain compliance
3) If unable to spray, estimated # of days before freeboard rises to less than 12" for those
lagoons above 12"
4) Percentage of total PAN (or total PAN) remaining under current cover crop and
acreage available without over -application or discharges
5) Age of current population & projected cycling out date for consideration of only
partial replacement or no replacement depending of freeboard situation
6) Possibility of animal reductions to reduce water usage and waste production including
Sow farms (i.e. removal of nursery pigs, finishing animals, sows as they complete
weaning, and removal of sows with greater than 8 weeks before birth)
7) Access to additional spray fields or pump & haul sites
8) Assessment of current freshwater usage & changes to reduce (i.e. new watering
nipples, etc)
9) Did facility sign up for DWQ/DSWC BMPs? If not, why?
10) Possible change in cropping patterns in future (i.e. row crops to grass, etc.)

BRASWELL MILLING COMPANY
P.O. Box 669 • NASHVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27856 • PHONE (91 9)
April 23, 1998
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
NCDENR
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, N. C. 27609
Subject: Response to Notice of Deficiency
Production Enterprises
Facility #64-13
Nash County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
In response to your letter dated 4/6/98, please find listed
below our outline of action that we are currently taking to
address the items noted in your letter:
1) We are now transferring data from our computer
generated information by hand to forms IRR-1
and IRR-2 separated by field number, crop type,
and crop cycle.
Application rates of waste water to winter cover crop
of wheat was at the approved rate of 50 lb., even
though a typographical error in our computer program
was showing as 200 lbs. Any future applications will
also be at 50 lb. and recorded accurately.
2) Freeboard continues to improve as we pump anytime the
weather permits.
Regarding your perceived seepage on the back side of
our lagoon, it has been determined that this water
flow is a result of a spoil pile that is adjacent to
this area that traps water during rain fall and
allows a small flow over a period of time which would
lead one to think that the lagoon may have a seepage
problem. Recently we have had some periods of dry
weather at which time the seepage has stopped.
If you should have any questions regarding this response,
plea ive me a call at [phone].
S e y yours,
ob Pike
General Manager

- :•ZL
Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number
)� - �� Operation is'flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: e,y,,&c,4,2, C!j 4 OW 02,1iJ'4? ✓ _ acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: n+/baj Part H eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: !/ Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: 1 i 2 f exemption El E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: i' Z Annual farm PAN deficit: -3 pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle hard -hose traveler; center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanen pi stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe,
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part Il - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields"- fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

Revised January 22, 1999
idlity Number
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD I COMMENTS3
NUMBER NUMBER' Z IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up Fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
1I

<4
*1V NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
April 6, 1998
Mr. Scott Braswell
Braswell Milling
P.O. Box 669
Nashville, North Carolina 27856
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Production Enterprises
Facility # 64-13
Nash County
Dear Mr. Braswell:
..., On March 24, 1998, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh
1F Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of the
,r
�.•.:'s subject animal operation. This inspection is a part of the
'?�iDivision's effort to determine compliance with the State's
,;-Animal Waste Management Regulations.
.,
„i*SMr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from
r' your facility was not actively discharging to the surface
"..fir..
waters of the State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches,
a or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of
willfully discharging wastewater) observed. However, as a
-� result of the inspection, the following deficiencies were
observed:
1)Record keeping at this facility needs improvement.
There should be copies of the waste application records
kept on site on the approved forms labeled IRR-1 and
IRR-2. These forms should be separated by field
number,crop type, and crop cycle so that an accurate
determination of nitrogen balance can be assessed.
These records are to be signed by the Operator In
Charge designated for each facility.
On the date of the inspection, it appeared that there
may have been some over application of wastewater at
this facility. The Waste Management Plan states that
when overseeding with a winter cover crop such as wheat
or rye that the plant available nitrogen (PAN) should
be based on 50 lbs.. The records that were available
showed that 200 lbs may have been used.
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /APPIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • SO% RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Scott Braswell
Page 2
2)Your secondary lagoon had only 8 inches of freeboard.,This
is less than the required amount of freeboard of 19 inches.
There was also signs that there may be some seepage on the
back side of your lagoon.
The deficiency regarding your lagoons should be corrected so that
an illegal discharge does not occur. The deficiencies in record
keeping should be corrected to reflect an accurate record of land
application activity at the subject farms.
Please respond to this Notice within 30 days of your receipt,
outlining what measures that you will take to correct the above
deficiencies.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this matter please call
Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
-4' neth ust , P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Nash County Health Department
Mr. Terry Best, Nash County Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
H:newnod.wpd

L/—T
r _ - ❑ DS€ n1ma1 Feedlot Qperation Re�1ew�
{ Y.f WQ An1ma1 Feedlot Opei•atlon Slte3nspectlon�
'
�. ��� a?i.�.� '� r �'f`"'°" �,��'. �. �� ��?,�. ..���. .am 4�'€ ° k-.: '' s '�.�. i tt kraa x,•'. —a,%S ;q s .✓as,�„ a ,e�',
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-u of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number ���
Time of Inspection I__1:C �.P.J 24 hr. (hh:mm)
�❑ ATotal Time (in fraction of hours
atu
Farm Sts: g,
r"" ""pplied for Permit (ex:1.2S for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
,J
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: _ ._.„„„.»„»»..........................»._..........
Farm Name: i_rASL_C1aL_zS_fr..:s ...» .» ......_...... county: „YI�►'�S y.....» ..............._._ .
63 Land Owner Name: � h`.R�ih!L.�l.........„„.... .»....... _ ..... ........... Phone No: ..��....
..�.�»»....�.�....__................
Facility Conctact:... t�i_� _. 5...� ... ..__.... .... Title:._ .. .. .. ...... _...._. Phone No:....»..... __....„......_„.....__......_......
Mailing Address: ...... s by .fl t. „....0'-.0..__.. �. t ......_.....»»...... „....__...............
Onsite Representative: !'AL `$.Y....... l..„»..... __.... ......... ._...... »»...... _..... Integrator: �!� � 3 G✓� �l ....„ „.............. ...........
Certified Operator: t) bar t S` �� Operator Certification Number:.... .............. .................
Location of Farm:
.._. _ . „ ...... „_....__...._ ..........._ .......... _ ....__. „._ ....r....._..„.�...._ ...»._....__...... .»...... ....................... ..........._.....__..........._....
_ .... __..... ..... __......................... ............_ ..... __...... .... _..„ ... ._...... .......__ ..._................ ........ »...........................
Latitude Longitude
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
DesignCurrent s Ems{ s' DC5ign CUrCent M Desi n Current
Ca M aci Apo ulation I?oul . Ca aci Po ulat�on le � l Ca aci ''`Po ulallon ,
❑ Wean to Feederk er O, ❑Dai
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
t
x x kq
Farrow to Feeder ` �Tottt DesigRCapactty
Farrow to Finish T:t40
3� ,;
aA �,
x�otaE SSLW % A4 x
❑ Other..
Subsurface Drains Present t"
h„�Number t) ag00AS �Hoiding Ponds ����,� ❑
❑ Lagoon Area, ❑Spray Field
G.Ilgral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
El Yes ;Z�
❑ Yes ld'No
❑ Yes bQ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

Facilit}' Number: — 1'
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes'Co
A Structures (LaQoons.11olding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc,
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Yes o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4' Structure 5 Structure fi
Identifier:
....................................................................
Freeboard (ft): !............................. ................. I .........
.........
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p`,�s�617 Cc, Me,„4_r ❑ YLs ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of" any of the structures observed? ❑ YesNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes L,d\o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'? ❑ Yes 'o
`Paste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? 5CC C O►- A-�✓ 1 Yes
(If in excess of WIMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type 6AefA!ww ..19. ��S,i+ir.......................................................................................................................................................... .
. .............................
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Pian (AWMI')'? ❑ Yes , b
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes l<O
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 9 qo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? El Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes \e
21. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Cl Y'c 10
22, Does record keeping need improvement? Yet [] No
For Cerjified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes IVo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N``
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? El Yes No
0 No.violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit.- You.will receive no further
correspondence about this.visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any ITS answers and/or any recommendations or any., other Comments.'
Use drnwinp,of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):'
�] V Srf • V { Xxppj%ft'Gy,- Lpq PAV— /3 r 41r4 (7 ha C r<(,�I.t fil �'�Y" .�'n e ► I FJ .
"
►'+'' rt� d►-. r� c.o� J t c c ra pp L. c rr- b n'I� 0-- '�� p sl n
/ /
a ! %� i9 .i'Y►+ L' tr �,e .+` s—t0 t [/� L�/ h .Q '�� ��1 cc),,J C- Lr/ n, "' zJ
7/25/97
ReviewerAnspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z

S,tate,of North,Carolina
D..,.
epartment off. Environment,' ,_
HealthandNatural Resources -
DIV1SlOn of Water Quality
e _.:1.._
James B. Hunt, Jr., 'Governor ,
Wayne ,McDevitt,* Secretary _
Steve W.-Tedder, Chairman
Robert L. Sykes
7118 Mecum Road
Spring Hope NC 27882
Dear Mr. Sykes:
0,-1 -r0
6`f - t 3
"'4
[7EHNJF`-1
November 6, 1997
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
x. .
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission
on Agricultural Waste, was ratified by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996.
This bill required that a properly certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste
management system.
The deadline for designating an Operator in Charge for animal waste management systems
involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry was January 1, 1997. Because a training and
certification program was not yet available for these systems, you were allowed to apply for and
were issued a temporary animal waste management certificate from the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). Because you applied for and were
issued a temporary certificate, you were allowed to be designated as the Operator in Charge of an
animal waste management system.
Your temporary certificate expires December 31, 1997, and is not renewable. Our records indicate
that you have not obtained a permanent animal waste management system operator certification. If
you intend to remain the Operator in Charge of the facility for which you were designated, you must
obtain a permanent animal waste management system operator certification of the appropriate type
before your temporary certification expires on December 31, 1997. To obtain a permanent
certification, you must be 18 years of age, complete ten hours of approved training, and pass an
examination. If you do not intend to remain the Operator in Charge, a properly certified animal
waste management system operator must be designated as Operator in Charge of the facility prior to
the expiration of your temporary certification.
This year's final training program for both Type A and Type B animal waste management systems
is scheduled for December 10 and 11, 1997, at the Hunt Horse Complex in Raleigh. If you would
like information about this training program, please contact your local cooperative extension agent
or call Dee Ann Cooper at 919/515-6968. For those enrolled in this training and registering with
Ms. Cooper prior to December 1, an exam will be offered at the Hunt Horse Complex on December
11, beginning at 1:00 pm.
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 2762E-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

JUN-01-2d21 E7: 59 -ERR'SL ELL N ? L L i NG
252 455 3855 .P .:.,?
r
�f
BRASWELL MILLING COMPANY
P.O. Box 669 Nashville, N.G. 27856
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] BRASWELL
Foaas
FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
DATE: ST - p—j -
TO:
COMPANY:
FAX NO.
TOTAL PAGES SENT (INCLUDING COVER SHEEN
COMMENTS:
The following fax message is:
I/ For your information- No reply necessary
For your action- No reply necessary
For your action- Please reply
SENDER', ,� P-
l vM � 11 &,;I
AVA

JUN-01-2001 08; 00 D RS'1WFLL i i 1 LL i �4�: 252 459 3555 ' P.012
1p? North Carolina Annual Report
For Business Corporations 0
.efcorporation: PRODUCTION ENTERPRISES, INC.
state of Inc❑rpor4on: NC
Secretary of State Corp,10 Number. 0117790 Fiscal Year Ending. 12 31-9 9
Mcnlh r Day r `cur
Fedarai Employer 10 Number 5 5-112 310 9
Check here It Information has not changed slnte most recently Iliad Annual Report, complete line 6 only. ► 0
1. Registered agent & registered office mailing address Ag-t HLEE YANG
maing A wra., 5 7 7 7 TAYLOR' S GIN ROAD
CASTALIA, NC 27816
2. Street address & county of registered office! stmetAdd,-ws 5777 TAYLOR' S GIN ROAD CASTALIA, NC
county: COUNTY — NASH
3. It registered agent changed, signature of new agent;
ttlOna!�rq aenaCWdes tu�semt W appo�n�+en�
4. Enter princlpal office address here- 5777 TAYLOR' S GIN ROAD
CASTALIA, NC 27816
S. tinterprinclpatofficetelephpnenumberhere: [phone]
6. Enter name, title and busimess address of principal officers here:
Nam: HLEE YANG � Title: PRESIDENT / SECRETARY
Address: 5777 TAYLOR' S GIN ROAD
City: CASTALIA state: NC zlp; 27 816
Name: KA Z , YANG Title: V . PRE S . 'TREASURER
Address: 5777 TAYLOR' S GIN ROAD
Clty: CASTALIA State: NC zip: 27816
Name: Title.
Address:
city: State: Zip'.
I --_
7. erlefly describa the nature ❑t business; EGG PRODUCER FOR COMMERCIAL EGGS
I
3 Certification of annual report must be completed by all corporations
PRESIDENT / SECRETARY
r an�E 171E;
51GNAT4tj£; (Far n mast he signed by atficer of mrPQPvon) DATE;
9693 r 1 Z ..,.. .
S2•i7.gp

jUN-01-2001 a8: ©3 ERRSLj-ELL - � I LL. i NG
252 459 5855 P._�
.ti
North Carona )
Agreement
Nash County )
This Agreement, entered into this the _j( day of January, I999, by and bermun A.
DOua[d Stallings� Ccoe E. Braswell, Sidney A. Wake, Ricky Lee Curtin, Exoemtor of tine
!Estate of Cecil L. Curtis and John T. Coley, M, hemiaahcr called the "Shareholders", and
Production Ruterptises, Inc., hereinafter called the "Corporation",
WrTNESSETH:
Whereas, Sharaholdm warrant, covenant and 69cc %hat they are all of the shareholders
of the Corporation; and
Whertuts, Shareholders have bargaiwd and agreed to sell ell of the outstanding shares of
the Common Stoic of the Corporation pursuant 10 the tetras and conditiow of a Slack Purchase
Agmenaratt with FE Y� Ka L Yang dated on or about January B, 1999; and
Wbcros, an A t dated October I, 1977, was execuwl by the stockholdcu of the
Corporation- and
Now Therefore, in caasideratioa of $100.00 and other valuable consideration, the
receipt of which is hereby acJw0wlodged, the Shareholders and the Corporation do now agree
that, nofv-0utaad* the terrors of the above referenced Agroaneut, Q of the Sb*r*hnldcrs are
entitled to execute the Stock Purchase Agreement with Mee Yana and Ka x.Yaog and that all /fit sI
shines of stock in the Corporation, m be sold, transferred and delivered free and clear of 4
claims, lieru, changes, encumbrances and equities relating to the Agreement attached w Exhibit
A, and tW each Shareholder may retain the proceeds from the sale of said shares of stock..
In witness utermf, we have herminto subscribed otrr names (and affixed our seals) the
day and year first above written.
Cone E. Braswell
J
Sidney A. Weeks
Estate of Cecil L. Curtis
Ii'�
rIc
u Executor
•. 1
Prod "
Enterprises, Inc.
By
[Prier Namc]

JUN-E i -20E 1 08 : 00 DR 5WELL r i i LL i ING: 252 45S 3855 ? . 34
• LJ
Election to Apply Specific Accounting Rules
in Connection with the Termination of a Shareholder's Entire Interest
PRODUCTION ENTERPRISES, INC.
5b-1123109
A Statement Attached to
U.S. Income Tax Return for an S Corporation
for the Year Ended December 31, 1999
Production Enterprises, Inc. is an S Corporation, and during this tax year,
(5) shareholders' entire shareholder interest in the corporation have been
terminated. With the consent of all its shareholders during the tax year,
Production Enterprises, Inc. -elects under IRC Sec. 1377(a)(2) and Prop.
Reg. 1.1377-1(b) to have the rules provided in IRC Sec. 1377(a)(1) applied
as if the tax year consisted of two separate tax years. This election is
made with respect to the termination of the entire interest of the following
shareholders;
Selling Shareholders: A. Donald Stallings
Gene E. Braswell
Sidney A. Weeks
John T. Coley, III
Ricky Lee Curtis, Executor ❑f the
Estate of Cecil L. Curtis
Manner of Shareholder's Terminations: Stock Purchased by
Hlee Yang & Ka Z Yang
Date of Termination: January 8, 1999
Under penalties of perjury, the following corporate officer declares that to
the best of his knowledge and belief, the statements contained herein are
true, correct, and complete,
ate jgnatu e of Offs r Title
The following shareholders of Production Enterprises, Inc. who represent all
persons who held stock in the corporation during the above referenced tax
year, do hereby consent to the corporate election under IRC Sec. 1377(b)(2)
and Prop. Reg. 1.1377-1(b) to treat the tax year as if it consisted of two
separate tax years.

.TUN-01-2001 09 : 0? BRASWELL i i 1 LL i'dS 252 459 3955 N , 'D5
Under penalties of perjury, each of the following shareholders declares
that to the best of his knowledge and belief, the statements contained
herein are true, correct, and complete.
Date Shareholder Si&nature
1-� 9 .09
Taxpa��r__ I``.DD. No. Address
11ye
►;L

7Uv-�i-2a©1 ae:0ti SR�,uW�! L "�:'�L:PJC 252 459 3a55 . �5
The undersigned hereby resign all positions held by them in
Production Enterprises, Inc., including their positions as Directors
and Officers of said corporation, effective the i �day of January,
1999.
A. DONALD STALLINGS
GENE E.~SRASWELL
SIDNEY A. WEEKS
�r
OHN T. COLEY, 1

JUN--01-2001 Octal BRr»5LELL 252 459 3855 P.07
STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
dared as of
January 8, 1999
by and among
A. DONALD STALLINGS,
GENE F. BRASWELL,
SIDNEY A. WEEKS,
JOHN T. COLEY, III,
and
DICKY LEE CURTIS, EXECUTOR OF THE
ESTATE OF CECIL L. CURTIS
and
PRODUCTION ENTERPR"SES, INC.
and
HLEE YANG and KA Z. YANG

JUN-01-2201 2S:01 252 459 ?955 ram, 2U
SELLERS:
( S EJkL )
A. DONALD STALLIkS
ATTEST:
of Secretary
(CORPORATE SEAL)
(S ERL )
GENE E . Bi2ASWELL
(SEAL)
SICNEY A. WEEKS
ESTATE OF CECIL CURTIS:
BY: Gi�4-t—p—
RICKYIEEE CURTIS - EXECUTOR
(SEAL)
OHN �T.CCC)iLEY, YIf
COMPANY:
PRODUCTION ENTERPRISES, INC.
0 f3 Y : /
PREST T
-I9-

JUU-01-2001 Oe: 01 BR SiJ ! " : ! ! tiu -5< 45y 3E55 r"
,P UR
R- qo
KA Z Y
-20-
(SEAL)
(SEA-L)
TUTPL F.39

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources `
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C) E P4 F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT_ REQUESTED
MR. SCOTT BRASWELL
PRODUCTION ENTERPRISES
BRASWELL MILLING
F.O. BOX 699
NASHVILLE, NC 27856
February 27, 1996
Subject: Notice of Violation # 95-79
Notice of Intent to Revoke Deemed Permit
Farm Number # 64-014
Nash County
Dear Mr. Braswell:
r�
FEB 2 8 1996
DEHNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
You are hereby notified that, having been deemed permitted to have a nondischarge permit for the
subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to
be in violation of your 2H .0217 Permit.
On October 26, 1995, staff from the Raleigh Regional Office responded to a citizen's complaint of
discolored water in Pig Basket Creek near the County Landfill. Further examination revealed that
the red colored water was emanating from the irrigation field at the subject facility, coursing
through the woods and entering an unnamed tributary to Pig Basket Creek.
In accordance with the requirements of NCAC 2H .0213, you are hereby given notice that sixty
(60) days following your receipt of this letter, the Division of Environmental Management intends
to revoke your permit unless the following conditions are completed:
1. Immediately eliminate the discharge of wastewater or correct the violation.
2. Make any modifications needed to ensure there will be no future discharges.
3. Submit an approved animal waste management plan and have the attached certification form
completed. One copy of the plan must be sent to your local Soil and Water Conservation
District. The certification form and two (2) copies of your plan must be returned to the address
below:
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section Operations Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Failure to comply with the above conditions will result in permit revocation and therefore, the
existing animal waste management system serving your animal operation will be in operation
without a permit as required by North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
Your approved animal waste management plan must explain how you will collect, store, treat and
land apply your animal waste in an environmentally acceptable manner. To assist you in the
development of this plan and to provide the required certification that the plan is acceptable, you
should contact your local agricultural agencies such as the Soil and Water Conservation District,
the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, the North Carolina Cooperative Extension
Service or a technical specialist designated pursuant to the rules adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
If we have not received the requested animal waste management plan and certification within 60
days of receipt of this letter or if there are additional discharges to the surface water a civil penalty
of up to $10,000 may be assessed and you may be required to apply for an individual
nondischarge permit from the Division. This permit, if issued, will contain monitoring and
reporting requirements determined to be necessary by the Division.
Although we will make every effort to work with you in correcting the problems found at your
facility, please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as preventing the Division from
taking appropriate enforcement actions for either these violations or other past or future violations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either Judy
Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor for our Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] or
Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone], ext. 581.
Sinc A. 7. Prerely,
s ton Howard, J ., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Fred Alexander - Nash County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, NC DSWC--Raleigh
Compliance/Enforcement File

BRASWELL MILLING COMPANY
P.O. Box 669 • NA5HVILLE, NoR7H CAROLINA 278556 0 PHONE [phone]
November 2, 1995
Mr. Steve Mitchell
DEHNR
3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, N. C. 27609
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
14
i
�? � � NOV - 3 I995
f
_J
In response to our notification letter dated October 27,
1995 and our phone conversation of today, I would like to
update you on my investigation of the Production Enterprises
matter.
On September 6, 1995, Mr. Danny Smith inspected the
wastewater lagoon and found that the allotted "Free -Board"
was insufficient and a management deficiency notification
was mailed on October 5, 1995. Since that time, our
management group has been trying to properly irrigate the
wastewater on nearby pasture lands as to pull the lagoon
level down below the compliance level and also to give added
volume in preparation for the upcoming wet season this winter.
It is our belief that during our recent irrigation period
a large hole in the feed pipe that attaches to the irrigation
head was responsible for a concentration of water discharge
around the irrigation head. We concluded that this
concentration of water formed a small run off stream that
may have caused the collecting of wastewater along the
edge of the spray field and exiting the property, entering
into an unnamed tributary to Pig Basket Creek. Upon my
most recent inspection, I did not see any discoloring or
excess run off into the unnamed creek.
We have taken corrective action by repairing the irrigation
system and given further training of personnel on
monitoring procedures. We have appointed a wastewater
manager within our company to be responsible for all of our
wastewater operations.

Mr. Steve Mitchell
Page 2
November 2, 1995
We also would welcome your assistance in expediting
our "Redeemed Permit Status" for this facility as
to be an example for all of our operations. We also
would welcome your office to visit us and any
information that will help us be better stewards of
the environment. Please give me a call at 919-459-
2143 at work or 919-459-3271 at home if any other
issues should arise that you deem important of my
attention.
Sincerely yours,
rMILLING COMPANY
Bob Pike
General Manager

MEMO
BATE:
TO:ya " SUBJE
IV4S� uw 4�jz� ;�I
C5'/k
wcyr" I a t.
From
t-Y North Carolina Department of Envirowhent,
Health and Natural Resource RJ(�J
•cam �'" � �,, rPrinted on AGCYGed Paper

CEIVED
S'
"•�•• MAY 0 5 199
State of North Carolina DEHNR-RAL RAJ
Department of Environment, .Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
May 5, 1993
CERT1FrED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Scott Braswell
Braswell Milling Qompany
P O Box 669
Nashville, N C 27856
Dear Mr. Braswell:
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.R.
Director
Subject: Designation of Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operation
Braswell Milling Company
Chicken Layer Operation
State Road 1310
Nash County
CAFO 93-007
A Certified Letter was sent from this Division dated April 23, 1993, which you received on April
26, 1993 indicating that the Rigge e Layer Operation has been designated as a concentrated animal feeding
operation. The letter contained an error that misnamed the name of the designated operation as the Bissette
Layer Operation instead of correctly naming the Braswell Milling Company.
This letter is to notify you that the Braswell Milling Company, referenced above is hereby
designated a concentrated animal feeding operation in accordance with Title 15A, North Carolina
Administrative Code 21-1.0123,'and adopted Federal Regulations 40 CFR 122.23. The designation of
your layer operation was based on inspection conducted on January 29, 1993 by Mr. Karl Shaffer and Nlr.
Shane McCarthy of the Raleigh Regional Office. These inspections showed that you had established a
concentrated animal feeding operation requiring such designation based on the following facts:
1. Wastewater from the operation has been discharged from a broken wastewater collection pipe. This
discharge has the potential to impact Pig Basket Creek in the Tar River watershed. This creek is classified
as class B NSW waters.
2. There are approximately 65,000 laying hens at the facility.
Regional Offices
Asheville Fayetteville :Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington W1nston-salcm
7041251-6208 9191496-1541 7041663-1699 919/571-4700 919/946.6491 919/395.3900 919/896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Braswell
Page-2-
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required for discharges of
waste to the surface waters of the State. However, if you can permanently eliminate the discharge by
implementing changes within sixty (60) days of your receipt of this notice, including, but not limited to,
removal of the animals from direct contact with the creek, modifications to lagoons, and the
implementation of a final waste disposal plan, a permit application will not be required. If compliance has
been achieved, you must notify us in writing within sixty (60) days describing, in detail, the changes or
modifications you made.
If the discharge of waste to the surface waters of the State is not permanently eliminated within
sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice, an NPDES permit application must be submitted within that time.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate, to the Director, Division of Environmental
Management, P. O. Box 29535, Raleigh, N C 27626-0535. Assistance, if desired, can be obtained by
contacting Mr. Timothy L. Donnelly, Water _ al Supervisor,800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh,
N.C. 27609: Fhone number 919-571-4700. The applications should be accompanied by constriction
plans for the animal waste management system.
For your information, the following items are enclosed:
1. One copy of the Federal Register- Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, 40 CFR 122.23
2. Three copies of NPDES Discharge Permit Application -Short Form B.
If you need financial of technical assistance with regard to managing animal waste, you should
contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District Office at telephone number 459-41115.
If you wish to contest this Designation, you must request an administrative hearing within thirty
(30) days of you receipt of this Notice. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. A copy of the Petition should be filed
with this office.
If you do not request an administrative hearing, this Designation will become final in thirty (30)
days,
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Enclosures
CC: �-TimDonnelly_Ral'eigh-RegionalOffice
Nash Fred Alexander - County Soil &'Water Conservation District
Jay Smith -Nash County Health Department
Steve Bennett -NC Division of Soil & Water Conservation
CAFO File

e
RECEIVED
APR 2 6 1993
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural RdR"R-RAIL RO
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
�� �► • l' 0
Hxellmllt!
Mr. Scott Braswell
Braswell Milling company
P O Box 669
Nashville, N C 27856
--�D ��
Gpf r�
April 23, 1993
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Director
Subject: Designation of Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operation
Braswell Milling Company
Chicken Layer Operation
State Road 1310
Nash County
CAFO 93-007
Dear Mr. Braswell:
This letter is to notify you that t Bisse Layer Operation, referenced above is hereby
designated a concentrated animal feeding opera n accordance with Title 15A, North Carolina
Administrative Code 2H.0123, and adopted Federal Regulations 40 CFR 122.23. The designation of
your layer operation was based on inspection conducted on January 29, 1993 by Mr. Karl Shaffler and
Mr. Shane McCarthy of the Raleigh Regional Office. These inspections showed that you a established a
concentrated animal feeding operation requiring such designation based on the following facts:
1. Wastewater from the operation has been discharged from a broken wastewater collection pipe. This
discharge has the potential to impact Pig Basket Creek in the Tar River watershed. This creek is classified
as class B NSW waters.
2. There are approximately 65,000 laying hens at the facility.
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required for discharges of
waste to the surface waters of the State. However, if you can permanently eliminate the discharge by
implementing changes within sixty (60) days of your receipt of this notice, including, but not limited to,
removal of the animals from direct contact with the creek, modifications to lagoons, and the
implementation of a final waste disposal plan, a permit application will not be required. If compliance has
been achieved, you must notify us inin writing within sixty (60) days describing, in detail, the changes or
modifications you made.
Regional Offices
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
7041251-6209 91914864541 7041663.1699 9191571-4700 9191946.6491 919/395-3900 9191896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

ky
'r.
Mr. Braswell
Page-2-
If the discharge of waste to the surface waters of the State is not permanently eliminated within
sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice, an NPDES permit application must be submitted within that time.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate, to the Director, Division of Environmental
Management, P. O. Box 29535, Raleigh, N C 27626-0535. Assistance, if desired, can be obtained by
The applications should be accompanied by construction
plans for the animal waste management system.
For your information, the following items are enclosed:
1. One copy of the Federal Register- Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, 40 CFR 122.23.
2. Three copies of NPDES Discharge Permit Application -Short Form B.
If you need financial of technical assistance with regard to managing animal waste, you should
contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District Office at telephone number 459-41115.
If you wish to contest this Designation, you must request an administrative hearing within thirty
(30) days of you receipt of this Notice. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. A copy of the Petition should be filed
with this office.
days,
If you do not request an administrative hearing, this Designation will become final in thirty (30)
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely, /
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Enclosures
CC: Tim Donnelly -Raleigh Regional Office
Fred Alexander -Nash County Soil & Water Conservation District
Jay Smith -Nash County Health Department
Steve Bennett -NC Division of Soil & Water Conservation
CAFO File

0"I
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
February 10, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO Kent Wiggins
Supervisor- Facility Assessment Unit
THROUGH Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervis
Timothy L. Donnelly, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM earl Shaffer- Soil Scientist
SUBJECT Designation of Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operation
Braswell Milling Company
Chicken -Layer Operation
State Road 1310
Nash County
fi?a n,-
Please find attached a letter foryer signature concerning
the above facility. At the time of the inspection, the operation
contained approximately-65,000 laying hens. Mr. Karl Shaffer and
Mr. Shane McCarthy of the Raleigh Regional Office (RRO) witnessed
evidence of a discharge from the facility by way of a broken
wastewater collection pipe. The discharge was to a tributary of
Pig Basket Creek in the Tar River Watershed, class B NSW.
If further information or a briefing session is necessary,
please contact me at the RRO.
Attachment

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 9 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James R Hunt, Jr., Governor DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANA*O Howes, Seery
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Scott Braswell
Braswell Milling Company
P.O. Box 669
Nashville, NC 27856
Subject: Designation of Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operation
Braswell Milling Company
Chicken Layer Operation
State Road 1310
Nash County
Dear Mr. Braswell:
This letter is to notify you that the Chicken Layer
Operation referenced above is hereby designated a concentrated
animal feeding operation in accordance with Title 15A, North
Carolina Administrative Code 2H .0123, and adopted Federal
Regulations 40 CFR 122.23. The designation of your operation was
based on an inspection conducted on January 29, 1993 by Mr. Karl
Shaffer and Mr. Shane McCarthy of the Raleigh Regional Office.
This inspection showed that you had established a concentrated
animal feeding operation requiring such designation based on the
following facts:
1. Wastewater from the operation has been discharged from a
broken wastewater collection pipe. This discharge has the
potential to impact Pig Basket Creek in the Tar River
watershed. This creek is classified as class B NSW waters.
2. There are approximately 65,000 laying hens at the facility.
PA. Bw 27M7, Rakigh, North Cw-dina 276117687 Tekphone 91%7334984 Fax it 919-733-052
An EgLaE Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

i
Mr. Braswell
Page -2--
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit is required for discharges of waste to the surface waters
of the State. However, if you can permanently eliminate the
discharge by implementing changes within sixty (60) days of your
receipt of this notice, including, but not limited to,
modifications to lagoons and the implementation of a final waste
disposal plan, a permit application will not be required. if
compliance has been achieved, you must notify us in writing
within sixty (60)'days describing, in detail, the changes or
modifications you made.
If the discharge of waste to the surface waters of the State
is not permanently eliminated within sixty (60) days of receipt
of this notice, an NPDES permit application must be submitted
within that time.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate, to
the Director, Division of Environmental Management, F.O. Box
29535, Raleigh, N.C. 27626--0535. Assistance, if desired, can be
obtained by contacting _Mr. T m_o_thy__L.__ Donn_e_lly_, _Wat_er Quality
Su ervisor 3800 Barrett Drive Suite 103 Raleigh, NC 27609-
phone number 919-571-4700. The applications should be accompanied
by construction plans for the animal waste management system.
For your information, the following items are enclosed:
1. One copy of the Federal Register- Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations, 40 CFR 122.23.
2. Three copies of NPDES Discharge Permit Application- Short Form
B.
If you need financial or technical assistance with regard to
managing animal waste, you should contact your local Soil and
Water Conservation District Office at telephone number 459-4115.
if you wish to contest this Designation, you must request an
administrative hearing within thirty (30) days of your receipt of
this Notice. This request must be in the form of a written
petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. A
copy of the Petition should be filed with this office.

Mr. Braswell
Page -3-
Tf you do not request an administrative hearing, this
Designation will become final in thirty (30) days.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please
do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Acting Director
Enclosures
CC: Mr. Tim Donnelly - Raleigh Regional office
Mr. Fred Alexander - Nash County Soil and Water
Conservation District
Mr. Jay Smith - Nash County Health Department
Mr. Steve Bennett - N.C. Division of Soil and Water
Conservation
CAFO Files

name M 0-mar of Property: (Check Re; i sver o F Moos or Tw�
�/ 11
-------------------
Mv
!�lti �_-'./'� •' C%»2� • {9��:•uz'�%:�� ^?1 rrY� �.Iz7-,z.`i`� �%SC3�r ;r'P-� ��� �'G� f�rr.�7.� �•�; •,C�
V
------------
--------------------------------
---- ---------------- -----•'---- - -- .-_.----- --- - - - ---
_ _ ., .J � L' 1_ - � _ :�. � _ � .C-'. I�it. +i�' •'(� ':/J U.I.i.l� .�/. Z.Y

I C) 1,) 0 �7
e r
proximity 7o Same nr Other Surface, w a L a r s
'D x 1 17) 7 f 1 t 0 i Je 1 h b 0 F1 I-- L] ti j0'i 5 e S !42 C
t9 -7iv :5z 1510
--------------------------
C)-i
or i snharq2: -7 (1
-,1-- --------------
0
f®reg
Ll
Are Pollutants Discharged into the Wa;-er� 3'F
S`�-Etp?
o-
ty SYSZEM ' or
other s ini
1 -c- onn- vade
dev! :e)
0-') err'-'zvz�J�
-
D-n n1sunarM25
DCCU--ed in a
Cf Lam ilia-
0 .7jr
RQ-ncu- 0 t P f-,
E-
C

Di jc 5
�rG
Z. C) 5 0
e b o a n i D D o n
ci
i n s P
EF C- a n
i nc-
oos ca
t n e 5
number's rDn�
statern=nts.
----------
-------------------------------------------
-----
21 - - -
--------------------
- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
rin L) 1 �j
Lj 1-
0
S
o ci ol
9 0
al
a s a r",
c c S,
X11,4

t,2
C4, '
fy
L, ^•
, J r
7 = _ S L! i - r_: wi L: C) i 7l, _l i:) U :) J F- ^� U �. S L'. •C JU1 C 7 7
--- �-----------���'�� ... If.);�?.1=-'i).�.!c111�'��� C1 c?(]21.f S�.�C? �'•r?;'�_:SUIU]U�r�C: .
V

ILI
'�— JfEP\i
� ♦ -) r` 11 ��'�•
�-�. ��r J �� II
` _ {I I �\ !Ir I'
`1.';
-- --� 2—JEEP
��1.� - _
�f " / r :'i:��l i �f `
• 'lk._ ..
rl /�\
I!. u`4�f c==
—�_-� � �.�
_ ��- 47�••• �
�1:\ [f � al\�\-. .-�l ' if 1 -
! o�

Appendix 1
i nsaec t ion Form For ,n wa i Opera t ions
Date of i n n p ec L i o n:
------/ th; --------------
came of Dw7e; of PrOpC?1 t'f': LG�eC'c R?c�� is O'f De or Ta—x
1CP)I /
-----&cd��P?�5--404 z SG�I GL�i%iI/1-LatW (',o'
Name o '= O v e r ,. � t o r
,.dd1-wss: 94/
--
-d_©---- ----------.-.v-__-_--------- ---
_r
Zd 0 o �� hacl �� �4d
I`ro of Operation (Examples: f a7rwq to finisht.Jr)pinq,
�airv; :,-e, cai ale, chickens -sayers or oroi i ors, tu,~'r?y
DrcductloAv etc.):_
Nu te- a J Type - i^ Ant m s :Dnd Uni �s .
Length -W Time Pnlmals,'Hav(_ S-'enr Are, or WWI Be -_tWr=d, --
Confined and Fed or Mn)ntained in :iny 1-, Mon-i-) Period.
- T -n _ _ , Vege . _.... on
�urany Go ...rn
. or Po .
_ - - - ves r?es l _ -cam
Sus Lain_t in the Normal
o=•: g==aGno
l.7vr_r-
... / !:>(-.,. - 1r),-,
-----------------------

,e5cripcion of Other Animal Dper@tion, 1 ^. IMUMTH Q Oe Vk-irll!
and Prux imi ty to Same or Other Sur-f,�ce t(- is
-.�.---_ - ------ _ _
prod lilll i y 0E,c l l l i y to INI2ighboT- f-toU ecs 6.121 _ S 2 t c .
-------------------------
pprbxlmate Dap h of GrourlC}'Nater Table _•n the Ar=a 01 the
r i 1 i y o r D S C }Z a r g 2 -- G+uT.C�!! rq-, s/ _ .r�/LQ _ r< 6� !�^ � Z-So l
Pry..._Mi :y 0 f 0 a c i l i ty a Sur face 0aters (provide nafiie P-nd
.
aj_, y,
A1sw
Dirt Fo11�-i ar? S I]2Scharged into the Sva t er-s of th-2 St 7i;f�� !'i!
So , ric-,-) 1 y or oy man-made di tcfl , IF 1 ush i rio s"sl&MI or
of er slrfi.':c..- ffiaf1 ,,ade devir2)
_Q___ __ .ram _ �jw
ev,d," 4?
ov
----------------------------------------------
Do or lea,/e Discharges Occurred in Response Go a Storm Event
of Less Them = GJ-year, 24-hour 1ntensi t4O ( if yes, include
f rlyf 1 iszo g of incidents and Busp ct_d cau5=5. ) Y
11) .....
Type 0 f Maine NaK_ g•_fi rift. ( Examp 1 =. . . Ply of _o .. . nomenis- T re ,
d. r i:. Upen 1 C ZS,sni ne houses ��cS4:.�1 '_ . '(Jc:' C? .-Ds i nL -d i = C_ t: sp ew i nq i n d w i� . Q r . i i'. i
� _ � col .. fig, �IOLC_�� ra
lGWooA or ,p. t, s.ngl,_ nr mui ..CeS I i %g0oi , l2 -.CCU )j,goun
12nd application of liquid: manure spray i ri-iGa. ion,
contractor disposal , etc.
24

CDpdit2on of Waste Nana gcmeiti_ i-aC_ i : ] ty (ra-o an pwr`q Ood, no
c=G- urge, sufficient Freeboard in ;,D)con, etc. inclL,c_�
a a t V 2 r condiCioir)s di_Ir'_np insp-cL1cn.) - -
--,� ! Dl sc jai-C'E-: + ln�:: iL1c _? nq pihotos _—nd ,j] mess' elan, 25,
-t= ysses, tpl2pbonws numbers and statements of face)-
- - - - - - - - - - ._--__--_------------- _-_--_
- --'- ------ �- --- -
�,��-�--------
-_____-___--__-----_------------------- ,_---- _
--------------------- -- -- -- --- - ----- _ - -- ____._I___.._-__.
dual 1 tv !on lode desorip;,;or) of samL)I inc,
G ccrLr-rrL-n VisuJi (D S—_ va';1Qi^i� c,ri; s pe c:'ld
_q ' atYv? cover" of ic':gd adjacent to W01.Pr ; L-'X1,&nt o
a i nfa l l and other factors r 5la t i ve O the likelihood of
zequency of discharge of an}mli ,'}asLeis and procP55
L 4
- - - - - _ - - - - - - .-• - _ - •- _• -_ --•
- -- - --- -- - -- _- - -. - _. .,- - -- _ - - .- - - ' - _- -.- - - - - - -I- - - - . - .. - _ .. --• •_ __ - _- -' `_ ._. .-
-------------
- - -- -- -- - - - - - - -- - - - - -- -

i
f?ecr�mrnn-r,d�,t: ions Made to n e r /C) tor--
r-1 v ---
f2C.iomrn rld a ions or f=urthe r c_tian: S? -ir
desigra. e, etc. )
Other Cormn?nts :

Appendix 1
inspection Form for AnimaL Operations
Date of Inspection:
Name of
Owner of Property: (Check Register
of Deeds
or Tar.
Office)
�i
SSG'D� �L7 RASWezI-
SUJ�w _
% 11LL1�i1_l1. Co.
Name of Operator :OrnFc �}_ c�UP�,P J9 _ - --
-__P� --------_--------------------------
__ -------__----------------__--_
Phone Number: TIU_Ii-ka"c -
_--______--__.-_______.-__-__-
Description of Facility Location (State Road Nos., etc.):
-- m_-----+-- ' -Q� cry N--_ -- __ .�
T- -- --
f
Type of Operation (Examples: farrow to finish, topping,
dairy, swine, cattle, chickens -layers or broilers, tu.rkQy
production, etc.):
Number and Type of Animals and Animal Units:
Length of Time Animals Have Been, Are', or W-i 11 Be Stab;-ed, oz-
Confined and Fed or Maintained in Any 12 Month Period.
---(/---------- r----- --- - -_
Are Crops, Vegetation Forage Growth, or Post -Harvest Residues
Sustained in the Normal Growing Season Over Any Portion of
the Lot or Facility? __ If__-,20 +�f ' ,i_;.S� 0(,-.IV&.D_PASTuE

Description of Other Animal Operations in Immediate Vicinity
and Proximi ty+ to Same or Other Surface Waters:_?'e - C /�,�rr DAf_
Proximity of Facility to Neighboring Houses, Wells, etc
o2D �� 6r� iYIaRE
----------------------------------------
Approximate Depth of Groundwater Table in the Area of the
Facility or Discharge: _1 __�-_ Ahru5 _gyp -��Q-joy MA-E�j -A"an
i
-------__------------------------_------
Proximity of Facility to Surface Waters (provide name and
class of surface oaters)
A�OU-T �D�GcT"
--------
l Sod
fF6?tc-1�E %a___��1�Jrg�K _�QC---
Are Pollutants Discharged into the Waters of the State? If
so, How? (directly or by man-made ditch, flushing system, or
other similar man-made device):_45=_A6F_'Enn�t�/a(GA6aa�u-
G,o�o2+c01 _Gu�'r �_ -w s Lv N N ! i _ I !J T'W 6_ �M7— 7� v?"_T�LBU r,�K � S DrryS s/ruck
1,AST e IAJ. t � 6INK4 jpjf0 11¢T�Q!2�9 7�_2`f7c
Do or Have Discharges Occurred in Response to a Storm Event
of Less Than a 25-year, 24-hour Intensity? (If yes, include �5'�AGj
a brief listing of incidents and suspected causes:): __-_- Ap"Wne 7- T
Type of Waste Management (Examples: type of confinement -free
stall barns, sheltered or limited shelter dirt lots, paved or
dirt open lots, swine houses, pasture; type of waste
handling -direct spreading in solid form, slotted floor with
lagoon or pit, single nr multi-cel) lagoon, aerated lagoon,
land application of liquid manure, spray irrigation,
contractor disposal, etc.)

L-A
- - - - - - s �42� _ o - - u � T _S� l _ w iC y _� S _�.0 � �/c1> _Ci R�r��O
-r
�tJA!e�S
Condition of Waste Management Facility (rate as poor -good, no
discharge, -,efficient freeboard in lagoon, etc. Include
weather conditions during inspection.) �uE,�y� (f � _c_ v_0 6j1-ry
- E ll� _) _fin �SmR - _6 uN6�►s6w,J _ O�'r IN.-- EE /,iA)
Animal Waste Discharge (including photos and witness' names,
addresses, telephones numbers and statements of fact).
---------------------------------- -T---------•----------
Water Quality Assessment: (Include description of sampling,
field measurements, visual observations and slope and
vegetative cover of ]arid adjacent to water, extent of
rainfall and other factors relative to the likelihood or
frequency of discharge of animal wastLes and process
wastewaters)

Recommendations Made to Owner /Dperator
f7ir
f-",�sc�t.�'r�c- � .hau�d �C •yn;<,�;�;Z`_�r i�- Y,�,r�te�
Recommendations for Further E Acton: (Re -ins -.act,
� r
designate, etc.0!1�-
-w--- ---- --
Other -Comments _WI �i_ �__�_`'_`^_^'
- •- - - - -iQ _ _�.tJ7C' -- -
13)°
i'YI ill!
e�r�aa�, /iJ0
.� ke-"44
Al
26

♦ -., r
Recommendations Made to Owner /Operator
- Aqo-r-
Recommendations for Further PE (act on: (Re-ins-..�ct,
designate, etc. )----- --Get--
Other �Comments----0tAM-v--W1-/1
w
J�ca.xfi '
r
1
�v
tl�

Department of Environment
f— and - Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
NCDENR
NQRTH I: AROUNA DEPARTHENT OF
ENviRoNMENT AND N4TLgAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality
January 6, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Hlee Yang
701 Burr Street
Apartment 1
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation To Enforce
Production Enterprises, Inc.
COC # AWP640013
Nash County
Dear Mr. Yang:
On December 30, 2002, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office ir<spected'the
subject abandoned poultry operation to perform a lagoon evaluation. The.inspection revealed that
there was only 1 inch of available freeboard in the lagoon and the wastewater from the lagoon
was actually over -topping one low area of the dike wall.
The Division has spoken recently with representatives of Wachovia Bank and your attorney, Mr.
Larry Norman. Through these discussions it was determined that you are still the owner of the
facility know as Production Enterprises, Inc., and as such the Division of Water Quality ,
recognizes you as the responsible party in all matters pertaining to Permit AWP640013.
Currently this facility is in violation of several permit conditions which include the
aforementioned freeboard violation as well as failure to notify the Division when freeboard level
is exceeded.
Please note that these violations are subject to civil penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per day, per
violation, and in some cases up to $ 25,000.00 per day.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Mr. Hlee Yang
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office is considering an enforcement action against you for violations
of Permit AWP640013. If you have any such justification that these violations have ben caused
by events or circumstances beyond your control you should include them along with your written
response to this Notice. Your response will be reviewed by the Regional Supervisor and
forwarded to the Director for his attention. In the event there is no justification for the violations
the Director will proceed with the enforcement action.
You should make immediate arrangements to have someone begin to pump the lagoon in order to
prevent an illegal discharge. Please note that if the lagoon does discharge the Division will also
consider this as part of the enforcement action against you.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Nash County Health Department
Nash Soil & Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Piles

F FZjrm B1 B(Official Form 18)
(9/97)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
Eastern District of North Carolina
In Re:
YANG, HLEE
701 BURR ST., APT. 1
SAINT PAUL, MN 55101
YANG, KA Z
701 BURR ST., APT. 1
SAINT PAUL, MN 55101
Social Security No(s).:
Debtor. 519-98-5979
Debtor
Joint: 471-94-0923
Case Number: 01-07558-8-JRL
Chapter: 7
f�1 1
1i �t
c
�
4
y
i
DISCHARGE OF DEBTOR
It appearing that the debtor is entitled to a discharge,
IT IS ORDERED:
The debtor is granted a discharge under section 727 of title 11, United States
Code, (the Bankruptcy Code).
Dated: January 9, 2002
BY THE COURT
United States Bankruptcy Judge
h �J Qvr SEE BACKSIDE OF THIS ORDER FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION
}
C� c ji 048176
� I

Form 18 Continued "
(9197)
EXPLANATION OF BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE
IN A CHAPTER 7 CASE
This court order grants a discharge to the person named as the debtor. It is not a dismissal of the case and
it does not determine how much money, if any, the trustee will pay to creditors.
Collection of Discharged Debts Prohibited
The discharge prohibits any attempt to collect from the debtor a debt that has been discharged For
example, a creditor is not permitted to contact a debtor by mail, phone, or otherwise, to file or continue a lawsuit, to
attach wages or other property, or to take any other action to collect a discharged debt from the debtor. [In a case
involving community property.] [There are also special rules that protect certain community property owned by the
debtor's spouse, even if that spouse did not file a bankruptcy case.] A creditor who violates this order can be
required to pay damages and attorney's fees to the debtor.
However, a creditor may have the right to enforce a valid lien, such as a mortgage or security interest,
against the debtor's property after the bankruptcy, if that lien was not avoided or eliminated in the bankruptcy case.
Also, a debtor may voluntarily pay any debt that has been discharged.
Debts that are Discharged -
The chapter 7 discharge order eliminates a debtor's legal obligation to pay a debt that is discharged Most,
but not all, types of debts are discharged if the debt existed on the date the bankruptcy case was filed. (If this case
was begun under a different chapter of the Bankruptcy Code and converted to chapter 7, the discharge applies to
debts owed when the bankruptcy case was converted.)
Debts that are Not Discharged
Some of the common types of debts which am not discharged in a chapter 7 bankruptcy case are:
a. Debts for most taxes;
b. Debts that are in the nature of alimony, maintenance, or support;
c. Debts for most student loans;
d. Debts for most fines, penalties, forfeitures, or criminal restitution obligations;
e. Debts for personal injuries or death caused by the debtor's operation of a motor vehicle while
intoxicated;
f. Some debts which were not properly listed by the debtor;
g. Debts that the bankruptcy court specifically has decuied or wi1T decide in this'bankruptcy case aro nut
discharged;
h. Debts for which the debtor has given up the discharge protections by signing a reaffirmation agreement
in compliance with the Bankruptcy Code requirements for reaffirmation of debts.
This information is only a general summary of the bankruptcy discharge. There are exceptions to
these general rules. Because the law is complicated, you may want to consult an attorney to determine the
exact effect of the discharge in this case.
048176 11009048273014
i
' it

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Division of Water Quality
May 4, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Ka Yang
Production Enterprises, Inc.
5777 Taylors Gin Road
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation To Enforce
Production Enterprise, Inc. Farm
COC AWP640013
Nash County
Dear Ms. Yang:
NCDEHR
NORTH CARot-mA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESoURCES
On April 30, 2001, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance
inspection at the subject poultry layer operation. The inspection revealed the following violations
of your Certificate of Coverage (COC) under General Permit AWG100000:
General Permit Condition I.,4., states that a copy of the General Permit and Certificate of
Coverage shall be on site and available for inspection.
No COC or General Permit was on site during the inspection.
General Permit Condition HI.,2., requires that weekly freeboard levels be recorded and kept on
site for inspection. Although there were some weekly freeboard records available, the inspection
revealed several missing months worth of these required records.
General Permit Condition III.,4., states that a waste analysis shall be collected within 60 days
(before or after) of the actual date of application. Land application records indicated that
application occurred in February of 2001. No current waste analysis was available and the last
analysis on site was dated October 2000.
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Production Enterprises, Inc.
Page 2
General Permit Condition III.,6.,e. requires that the Permittee should notify the appropriate
Regional Office within 24 hours of the first knowledge of failure to maintain the required
freeboard level in the waste lagoon.
Freeboard records that were available during the inspection showed that the freeboard level in the
lagoon had gotten to 16 inches during the winter months of 2000.
The freeboard level during the April 30, 2001 inspection was 17.5 inches.
Please note that the above violations of your Certificate of Coverage and Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan are subject to civil penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per day, per violation, and in
some cases may be subject to civil penalties of up to $ 25,000.00 per day, per violation.
The Raleigh Regional Office is considering an enforcement action against you for the above
referenced violations. You should respond in writin within fourteen days of receipt of this
Notice. If you have justification that these violations were caused by circumstances or events
beyond your control you should include them along with your response letter. Your response will
be reviewed and forwarded to the Director. In the absence of any justification the Director will
proceed with the enforcement action.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice you should contact Buster Towell at (919) 571-
4700.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Nash County Health Department
Nash Soil & Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group
RRO Files

BRA vvTLL 105 CROSS ST• PO BOX 669 • NASHVILLE, NC 27856 • [phone] • FAX [phone]
FOODS
August 27, 2001
` x"
�N
Mr. Buster Towel
State of North Carolina
DWQ
1617 Mail Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Towel:
I wanted to let your department know that Braswell Egg
Company has removed all of our egg laying hens from the
Production Enterprise farm effective 08/25/01. We
understand that Wachovia Bank is working with the Yangs
to develop the next steps for this operation. We have
offered to Wachovia our assistance in keeping the lagoon
pump down in a proper fashion. At this time, we have no
interest in utilizing this facility in the future unless
extensive renovations are made.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
r /
fBob Pike
Vice President/General Manager
cc:Craig Wilson
Braswell Milling Co. • Braswell Egg Co. • Carolina Egg Co., Inc. • Glenwood Foods, LLC
Natures's Finest Foods, Inc. • Carolina Egg Development Co.

IWI NN
y
J
N2
JA_
!a j,''. c `� �51 �
�/� 0 � �
`/`I !/ � 1• \ i /
1 •
t Ir (� �
��f � � . � f" .,.rfG
�I
nbCi
L)
L
!� �!-J• R .
. Y 1: •.O ��
/
fir, % \ _ {/ I 1 � �' ^1 V \ 1 �> [
.
IN,
-1v
NI
L
\�
�:� �'`��
_ ,� ,� �:�,
\� � _) � � �
� ,, L-,�,� � _'mil` � . -f �- � _�' I'�`��\
/ 1 ,
71,
'�.r� ��' � °�.• �
�� .�°-. ;='\
�'j
,, �•\ ,,,�
ry Eli
/��
� -�\ {I.ZIA'1)�'S
_ f? • r � .1 `I�
�y—L �\\\ _ L I i. . , ����?z -1 �r •L
•• �,�'
N,
XI_
NN,
N,
------
-
~�
(- -- � ! G;
'^y, �\�, . �!r- ; ��._
� \l��
N
I�f _ U � Q-�. -`.r- :-� � i ��; /�O. - � \
-. 115
\ �. :l
���t%i �j - .'1,�
L�
01 n
`\ 1
\ \�,
0_2
a
�,`�'' `V�
�� to A,
3 ­71
','1
-99
� \ / `.:111 Y r -1'-
` \� \ III I r [
r / /il \
f r `\`
13,
W,
I NX
r . ��
. � � i
� A � (� �_-� '-�..._ ��
� �.� �) }� � � � CCU
� �� \` /Ifr/ � l/,/ '�
_ ��•"��v,f-�__
---- -------
��d33f
���-`
�- -,� \7\' _� �r-
�
r�l .� ` �\
1 �\,4ti 1�
�� ��;ii. �f
`\ _ /�_`\i-'! �
;� /
LC r
7
_•
l 66i
�
�t�--
�: �RIj f
�
`�O _� /
�\ �.��� \ �
'ter � ��
i •�-
:06/
00