510074_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Schneier, Joan
From: Alma Terpening <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 10:11 AM
To: Schneier, Joan
Subject: Fwd: Nitrogen per lb
Hi Joan,
This is what I recieved from Viridian. Is this sufficient, or do you need to come back out?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rob Taylor <rob c�i,vrmsinc.com>
Date: Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:55 AM
Subject: Nitrogen per lb
To: amterl)[e-mail]
Alma,
The 2.86 lbs per nitrogen was calculated based on a combination of the sludge and water analysis. Based on a survey of
the lagoon length x width x depth and estimated depth of sludge and estimated depth of water the following was
calculated to come up with the lbs of nitrogen per 1000 gallons
Waste analysis liquid. .89 @ 187,678 gallons = 150.14 lbs of PAN. 26% of total volume .89 X .26
.23
Waste analysis Sludge 3.55 @ 556,342 gallons = 1975.0 lbs of PAN. 74% of total volume 3.55 X .74 =
2.63
Gives you 2.86 lbs PAN mixed volume concentration/ 1000 gal.
If you have any other questions, let me know.
Thanks
Rob Taylor
1

Viridian Residual Management Services
PO Box 8
Teachey, NC 28464
Telephone/Fax [phone] ext 230✓+
Cell 910-271-0420
Robe- C,Tu O/ ar 6 x6 a011
A V,j- gg4lqb-'I-
twif, gg4703 ExaN awa
L4* 806k tf for E'+OW
Azc. Qr *1 dI al
Alma Terpening
Virg i ch �`d s9 v�ilir
� W 60035 g�l
Loki 0( Pei IV4 so(1b fs - ri�Rp-$v�fe
©v— Qo6-�CTaj/a QgZ703 LA 1 PrQ�1o���a�vlPr
��ir►p Ti hr iel l e. 13.) 47 LA-
WR 4d&esl
6 I B N
�a��a a� `►��
Ann► t
2

51-007q
Mi
Central Crop Station Sludge Application May 2014
AWS510074
-
Tract &
Field #
Crop Type
Soil
C
PAN Calc
PAN Used
Field Size
(acres)
Number
of Loads
per Field
BF-1
Bermuda Pasture
76 ✓
12.14
81 75
4000
FF-1
Bermuda Pasture-*76
✓
15.68 ✓
34 v', l
4000
H1D
Switch Grass
VVjq ati
76
1.1 �/
7 f
4000
11
Switch Grass
A
y'�
70 ✓
:6
10
4000
C9
Switch Grass
t
76
°y 1 .✓
7 ,/
4000
13A1
Switch Grass ✓
�fl
((�y
76 ✓
0.65 ✓
4 ✓✓
4000
13A2
Switch Grass
i
76 ✓
0.65 ✓
✓
9000
13B
Bermuda Pasture
Ce CA gcerc
4 j,,W
75 v1
1.4
9 ✓✓
4000
13EY,
Switch Grass /
76 ✓
(0:6
4 ,/✓
4000
13F
Switch Grass ,/
i
76
1.1
7 ✓,/
4000
eWVA�I
sd,j r,
w35 1a) ef-00v7
1� I fa'2 -16a &-7
((3o�a sl�aye - 6.90P, I
7 6� Ll1
AZ-, tb,tqC�
irp+W b+741Y
Tom' i
i

14
Appendix 1. Lagoon Sludge Survey Form Revised August 2008
A Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number
B. Lagoon Identification l
C. Person(s) Taking Measurements A 1 rya
D. Date of Measurements . --7 1 Z� _ I
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of
a. Distance from la$ on liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer:
_ © If- t..a,'1-t. I i
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon:
P_CIc- _
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler":
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): • ;L (acres)
(Draw a sketch of the lagoon on a separate sheet, list dimensions, and calculate surface area. The lagoon may
have been built different than designed, so measurements should be made.)
G. Estimate number of sampling rots•
a. Less than 1.33 acres: se 8
b. If more than 1.33 acres, acres x 6 = , with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform grid that has the same number of intersections as the
estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the intersection points on the lagoon grid so that
data recorded at each,can be easily matched.) -
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on `Sludge Survey Data Sheet" (Appendix 2). Also, at the location bi
the pump intake, take measurement of distance from liquid surface to top of sludge layer and record it
on the Data Sheet (last row); this must be at least 2.5 ft. when irrigating.
I. At the time of the sludge survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Pmsent
Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gauge pole): 7 n
J. Determine the distance from the top of bank to the Maximum Liquid Level
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records)
K. Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Minimum Liquid Level
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records)
L. Calculate the distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level N N
(Item K minus Item I, assuming the present liquid level is below the Maximum Liquid Level):
M. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the lagoon
bottom (average for all the measurement points): II . 3
N. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from ft present liquid surface level to the top of the
sludge layer (average for all the measurement points):
O. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer. 3
P. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item N minus Item L): 3
Q. If Item 4 is greater than Item P, proceed to the Worksheet for Sludge Volume and Treatment Volume.
If Item 4 is equal to or less than Item P, you do not have to determine volumes.
a_ ----% N.
Completed by:
Print Name

Appendix 2. Sludge Survey Data Sheet* Revised August 2008
Lagoon Identification:
Completed by: Date:
Print Name Slonature
(A)
Grid
Point
No.
(B)
Distance from liquid
surface to top of sludge
(C)—
Distance from liquid surface
to lagoon bottom (soil)
(C) minus (B)
Thickness of sludge layer
Ft. & in.
F,tt...t.e�n�tths)
Ft. & in.
Ft. tenths
Ft. & in.
Ft. tenths
1
G /iJi
1 `�
ICJ
f f -) �1
1 1/
2
i 11
.0
It t 1 0
y
�1
�~
3
g to
kw i
10
4
SIC)`
6
--7 f 1r
5
11 j1
1
, to
7
19'9'
dZZ81
+�Is
9'
'3.Z.5-
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Number of points with
readings
�O
X
�O 25
X
o�
Average
af
Dints
At
pump
Intake
X
X
X
X
^. *All Grid Points and carresnonding sludge layer thidWes must be shown on a sketch attached
to #his Sludge Survey Data Sheet. See Appendix 4 for conversion from inches to tenths of a foot.

' y �
AppeAft I Worloheet for sludge volume and treatatem vdome Retied August 2M
The average thickness of tits sh*e layer and due daclnness of ttte ea aft liquid (sludge4w) trraftmt
am (err dotaryr wd from ttdornaation on the Upon Sludge Survey Forth (Ituns O and P. respeedvely).
rffl this example, the avemge sladga layer tlr[cilmass is 2.5 feet and the existing liquid t+reatmem soma is 3.5
fit• if the Wow lhuts a des%*W ftdtte storage vd =n. see at end of d* woMheet. The
ciimenstoam of the lagoon as nto= ed and die side elope era needed ii m calculations of sludge vohm
OW of total Ueah=t volmne. If the lagoon is a standard geometric ehepc, Me.dudge volmw ftd
tzeutmetn volum in the lap= sun be csft od by using ffwWwd apatiotts• For approxhMa vokmas
of recun$Jar lapow with constant side slope.,calculate length and width at the "*Oohft of the layoT.
and tnuttlply by Iqu thiclmsss to calculate layer volume, as shown in ft eacemple. For lrreagular shapes}
aowmt the total surfhce area to a sgtaaro or mctuVlar shge. For exact volume for lagoons with
comet dft slope, the " "m oldal.Equwft s" may be used.
1. Mwage Sludge Layer Titioimass (1I
2. Depth oflagoon fi'om top of bank
to bottom soil sudco (D)
3. Slope = hodzmad verdW aide slope (3)
a. La4p at top faslde basic (L)
S. Width at top inside bank M
6. Lengtb at.rW#*fm of sludge layer
L,„ - L— 2 3 (n- (T/2))
7. Width at midpoint of sludge layer
K, = W 2 S (D �- (T12))
S. Volww of ahtdge (Vs):
Vs=La,W„T
Exempla Your lagoon
UL
A
4S7 R
22.91k
9. Volume in gallons;
Vss-V * 73 gaMe. 1.273.9 Q mot•
10. I'titicicnm of existing liquid but Zone (Y .3 ft,.......`
11. ThielEness of total ttastmeat nma (Z)--
ZaT4-Y
(Appendix ) vontWwW on next Pe}

Revised August 2008
Appendix 3. Worksheet for sludge volume and treatment volume (continued)
12. Length at midpoint of total tmt. zone
Lz = L — 2(S) (D — (Z/2)
13. Width at midpoint of total tmt. zone
Wz = W — 2(S) (D — (Z/2)
14. Volume of total treatment zone (Vz)
Vz = Lz Wz Z
—. 409f_
444.174 f?
15. Ratio (R) of sludge layer volume to total
Treatment volume
R = Vs/Vz $�*
if the ratio exceeds 0.50, than a sludge Plan of Action may be required. Check with
DWQ for Information on filing the Plan of Action.
Note: If the lagoon has a designed sludge storage volume (DSSV), subtract that volume from
both the volume of sludge (Vs) (Item 8) and from the volume of total treatment zone (Vz) (Item
14), and take the ratio:
R = (Vs — DSSV) / (Vz — DSSV)
Example: If DSSV = 85,000 fl, then R = (169,860 — 85,000) / (444,174 — 85,000)
R = 84,860 / 359,174 = 0.24

5fff),.Cv Aff") —J)l j,Joqbi 1;1c3i'll
n , ik;N,, j 1 i—ru -r-n i oV
1031 of tirmilo
n 11('111 G-r-0 0-vluq
Ia sai,9 jf,
Wt r4,-, nfOarwitiod QW6
orrsolco- ,;, -C1 moi., :)ghljja
fivni) (sv) iv—,00 01TILljov *61 mr-11 Gm f'? wWl) (?V) oabufel,-)
adur fAL", JIM,
:l IVA!

Appendix 4. Conversion table from inches to tenths of a foot.
Inches
Tenths of
foot
Inches
Tenths of
foot
1
0.1
7
0.'6
2
10.2
8.
0.7
3-
0.2
9
0.7
4
0.3
10
0.8
5
0.4
11
0.9.
6
0:5
r
17

� s �
y—. AWwdix I. Upon Sludge Survey Form Inked August 2009
A. Farris Permit or DWQ ldentifleali� mber �7 r %' %
>3. l,agcan ldcutificatiosr
C, Porson(s) Taking Moaaumments ea
1). Date of Measmvinom - _ P, ` �� ..-�..... ,...._......,
E. MetbodwDevica Used for Mcaeurement of:
a. Distance ft= lagoon liquid surface to • a top of the al ulpe layer:
1" L iA).•JCA ,11. L_
b. Distance ftm the lagoaq liquid surface to the bottom (boil) of the lagoon:
a. Tbkkum of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler":
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimenoWns at inside top of bank): (acres)
,T"W a alteeMh of the lagoaa an a separate shoat, list dimensions, and cal ate surface area. The lopme rosy
/ bave been built diffaererst then dedp4 so ttienatlromettb should be made.)
G. Estimate number of sampling ts:
a. Lela than 1, 33 aorta: as 8 points
b. if note than'.-33 acres, acres x 6 � with maximum of 24.
` (Using sketoh and dimonsiom, develop a uniform grid that has the saute number of intersectime as the
estimated numbor ofvampling yoirna needed. Number the intersei;tion points on the lagoon grid so that
damr.corded r, each ran be easily matched.)
H. Conduct Sludge survey and raoord data on "Sludge Survvy Data Sheet" (Appendlx 2). Also, at the locatioo of
the pump Wtallw, take measurement of distance front ggttid surface to top of stodge layer and record it
on the Imtu Sheet (last raw); tub roust be at Isast 2.3 ft. when irrigating.
t. At At time of the sludge survey, also measure the dieiemcc fro the With- tu+n Liquid Level to the Present
Liquid Level (measure at the lagoon gauge pole): ��Je,.+�• �f �
.1_ Determine the distance from the top of'banlc to the Maximum Liquid Level , _� �•J o
_%e,
(nee lagoon erattagemsnt plan or other lagoon records)
K Dawmine the distance f1m the Maximum Liquid Level to the Minimum Liquid Level
(use lagoon management plan or otbcr lagoon records)
L. Calculate the distance From tha.present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level ,
(ttwn R. mints Item I, assuming the prcmcrn liquid level Is below the Maximum Likud Level):
At. RLee d from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance the present liquid surface level to the lagoon
bottom (avange fbt all the mmuromont points): 12.3
N. .R=rd from the Sludge Survey Date Sheet the distance from tho present liquid surface level to the top of the
sludge layer (average for all the tneaeuremvnt yoitste): '
O. Reeord from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludpa layer —let f
P. Calculate rite t1dialmew of the exining Liquid Tow m 0 Zone (Item N ttdnus Item L):
Q. 1f Item O Is greater than Item P, proceed to the Worikshect for Stadgs Volume And Treatment Volume.
If Item O is equal to air less than item F. you dyyaot )ave to determine volumes.
Completed by:
- r3

Appendix 3. Worlxahert for sludge volxtnne and treatment volume Revised Aingust 280$
The average thickness of the sludge layer and the thickness of the existing liquid (sludge4w) treatment
zone (are detormi=4 from inf6mvition on the Lagoon Sludge Survey Farm (Items O and P, respectively).
In this example, the average sludge layer thickness is 2.5 feet and the existing liquid treatment zone is 3.5
feet. If the lagoon has it designed sludge storage volume, sec notes at end of tbt vaorksheet. The
dimensions of the lagoon, as meaaured and the side slope arc needed for calculations of sludge voltavc
and of total treatment volume. If the lagoon is a standard geometric shape, the sludge volume and
treatment volume in the lagoon can be cstimatod by using standard egnatiom For approximate volumes
of tectangplar lagoord with constant side slope, valcuiate length and width at the midpoint of the layer.
and multiply by layer tNckaw to ealcWate layer volume, as sbowa in the amimple. For irregular ftes.
cow&** the total Wave area to a square or rectangular ehgv. For exact volumes for lagoons with
coins w side slope, the "Prismoldal Equations" may be used.
ExanVle Your lagoon
1. Arerage Sludge Layer Thickness (T}
7,
2. Depth of lagoon from top of bank
to bottom soil unface (D)
3. Slope = horizontWverdW side slope (S)
3
4. Length at top inside bank (L)
4S7 fL
S. Width at top i mdc book (VI)
2g9 ft
& Length at widpoint of sludge layer
Lr, - L — 2 S (D- (T/2)) 398
7. Width at midpoint of sludge layer
W.=W—ZS(D—(T/2)) 170.5R
8. Volume of sludge (Vs):
Vs = I. n Wr, T 169 BtSt7 .$'_
9. Volume in gallons:
Vsr nV - 7.5 gall e. 27�
10. Thickness of existing liquid trot. Zone (Y)
11. Thickness of total treatment zone (Z) 6.O RR
ZRT*Y
(Appendix 3 ooatWued on next page)

yw• yM• sVyJ LV. Ju J}Ji ww lidJ J�Lp A:f!NMU
1'#n ALA GV, S.1!
Sevised August 2048
A.ppwAlz 3. Werbbeet for sludge volume and treatment volume (continued)
12. Length at'midpoint oftoW tmt zone a09 ftft:,___
Lz m L — 2(8) (D -- (M)
13. width at midpoint of total tmt. zom 111 fL
Wz - W — 2(S) (D -- (ZI2)
14. Volume of total awtume zone (V%) 444.174
Vs - 1s Wz z
15. Ratio {} } of sludge layer volume to tawl
Trefthimt volume
R-V%IVz 0.33
If the ratio exceeds W than a sludge Plan of Action may 5e required. C'.he& with
DWQ for inform ion on thing the Plata of Aeon.
Note: If the lagoou has a designed sludge storage volume (DSSV), subtract that volume from
both dw volume of sludge (Vs) (Item 8) and from the volume of total treatment zone (Vz) (Item
14), and take the ratio:
R. = (Vs — DSSV) I (Vz -- DSSV)
Example:: If ASSV = 85,000 W, than R — (169,860 — $5,000) i (444,174 — $5,000)
R - 84,960 / 359,174 - 0.24

AM.nd.Ix 2. Sludge Survey Data Sheet*_
Lagoon Identification: 6i4.{.. �
Rttvised August 2008
Cwpltdad by. Date:
Prim AIAma 101innnr��.o
(A) (g)
Grid Distance from liquid
ce Point surfato tap of sludge
Flo.
FL & in, Ft. tenths
(C)
Distance from Hquid surface
to lagoon bottom (soil)
(C) minus (8)
Thickness of sludge layer
Ft. a In.
Ft, tenths
Ft. & in.
Ft the
F ti
2
r e
r 1r
I 7r
4
"
7 0
► l�
5
rt
r t�
�
t tt
r
t it
7
t t
r`
CIA"
t 5 fr
.9
10
11
12
i
13
14
15
l
16
1T
1s
1t3
20
21
1
72
23
24
Number of pobr t wkb
readlino
I I, 6Lx
x
,
Average
Of
oints
�.
lit
PUMP
inta
X
?C
X
X
*AU.(add PWAm Onla
5 $e S�Xy D&ta Sheet. Soo Appendix 4 for convt rOon f m incha. to tenths of s foot.

Appendix 4. Conversion table from inches to tenths of a foot.
Inches
Tenths of
foot
Inches
Tenths of
foot
1
0.1
7
0.'6
2
02
8.
0.7
3
.0.2
9
0.7
4
0.3 .,
TO
4.8
5
0.4
11
0.9
6
0.5
Se-ed,f k I
d0-04-OM
17

VOLUME TO BE REMOVED
Length (Top)
Width (Top)
Total Depth
Side Slopes
Liquid Depth (ft)
Sludge Depth (ft)
Freeboard (ft)
Lagoon Dims. @ Liquid Level 70p
Lagoon Dims. @ Sludge Level Tof
Lagoon Dims. @ Bottom
120.00
114
140
120.00
12.00
g1€E?ijESC€,i'Nate"Ent`er"h'onzontal'#forsideslo'pe',
2.00
example For 3 1 side slopes; enter 3
7.00
3.00
Length
Width
114.00
114.00
110.00
110.00
96.00 �/
96.00L/
Cubic Feet Gallons ✓ a5
Liquid Depth 25090.67 ✓ 187678.19
Sludge.Depth 74377.33 556342.45 `� -75%
Total 99468.00 ✓ 74�?20.64 ..�
ovo yq it

Table 1. Summary of Recommended Agronomic Rates for Energy Crops as required by S.L. 2011-198
September 11, 2014
For all energy crops listed below where animal waste is applied, total harvestable biomass must be
removed from the field. Harvest dates should be documented in waste management records. -
p""p; I ' '­ ' ' � i " `1'1� t
icatidn'W"
- M­"' " ", 1, Considerations)
anagement era
I'Tf�
"I"li"I
i". 'i 1;�
1, mE
Plugged
Year 1
150 lbs per acre
March 1— August 31
1217 Guidance regarding
regardless of soil type
overseed for Bermudagrass is
applicable for all switchgrass
systems.
Year 2 and subsequent
Equivalent to Hybrid
March 1— August 31
Overseed not recommended
years
Bermudagrass rates, not
to exceed 250 lbs per
acre
Seeded
Year 1
30% of the third year N
March 1— August 31
1217 Guidance regarding
rate
overseed for Bermudagrass is
applicable for all switchgrass
systems.
Year 2
70% of the third year N
March 1— August 31
Overseed not recommended
rate
Year 3 and subsequent
Equivalent to Hybrid
March 1— August 31
Overseed not recommended
years
Bermudagrass rates, not
to exceed 250 lbs per
acre
td
A" i660MI
a
;App IcatIofi'Wi ridewLI.kl
gi
w
�'i01liuR
I
1,
�
. "R6
V
111,;
Fiber Sorghum
Equivalent to Sorghum
March 15 — August 31
Sudan Hybrid rates,
Sweet Sorghum (single
80 lbs of N regardless of
May 1 —July 31
green harvest)
soil type
Sweet Sorghum (multiple
First Harvest: 80 lbs of N
First Harvest:
green harvest)
regardless of soil type
May i—july3l
Second Harvest: 20 lbs of
Second Harvest:
I N regardless of soil type
Extend until August 31
December 1, 2014

'i. NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone. [phone] Website: www.neagr.gov/agronomi/ FY14-WO05016
¢"Predictive Client: Central Crops Research Advisor.,
i' Station
4
zu = Waste Report 13223 US 70 W.
Clayton, NC 27520
.}=
Johnston County
hN_\'p1i11�'
Sampled: 02/18/2014 Received: 02/18/2014 completed: 02/25/2014 Farm: 5174 Links to Helpful Information
Sample Information
Nutrient and Other Measurements
Nitrogen (N) (ppm) P (ppm) K (ppm) Ca (ppm) Mq (ppm) S (ppm) Fe (ppm) Mn (ppm) Zn (ppm) Cu (ppm) B (ppm) Na (ppm) C (ppm)
Sample !D: 02
Total N 21.7 202 88.2 27.8 8.33 1,61 0.11 0.27 0.21 0.24 65.4
Waste Code: AES
Description:
Total Kjeldahl N 212 -- --- --- -- -----------•-- - ---------- ----- --------- ---- ----------------------------------------------------------- -
Aerobic Liquid - Swine
p!-1 DM (%) SS (10-$S/cm) EC (mS/cm) CCE (46) ALE(1000 gal.) C.N
Inorganic N
Comments:
NH4-N 7.06
NO3-N
Organic N Ni (ppm) Cd (ppm) Pb (ppm) Al (ppm) Se (ppm) Li (ppm) As (ppm) Cr (ppm) Co (ppm) CI (ppm) Mo (ppm)
Urea
Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop (lb 1 i000 gal.) Other Elements (lb 11000 gal.)
Application Method
N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu 8 Mo Cl Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Irrigation
0.89 0.29 1.62 0.51 0.16 0.05 0.01 T T T T 0.55
Understanding the Waste Report * - additional information: www.ncagr.gov/agronomibdffiles/uwaste,pdf & www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/pdffiles/wasteguide.pdf
Nutrient concentrations and other data on this report are provided so that waste materials can be applied at agronomic rates, thereby supplementing or reducing fertilizer application and
preventing environmental contamination. In reading the Laboratory Results section, remember that materials with < 15% dry matter (generally liquids) are analyzed as received; all
other wastes are dried first. Values in the Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop section are based on the type of waste and method of application you specify and reflect the
fact that only 40-60% of the nitrogen and 70-100% of other nutrients become available within one year of application. The remainder may or may not ever become available.
' ppm = parts per million; S = siemens; mS = millisiemens; T = trace (<0.005 lb/unit); EC = electrical conductivity; CCE = calcium carbonate equivalence; ALE = agricultural lime
equivalence; pH = acidity or basicity; DM% _ % dry matter (for semi -solid and solid waste samples, this value facilitates conversion of dry -basis concentrations (ppm) back to wet -basis
of original sample]; C:N ratio = carbon:nitrogen ratio.
North Carolina
4 e:�
�i '6k5
1aKm<a trust Fund CommiWoo
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of agriculture.

+ NCDABCS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomd FY14-WO04172
�•fti:l it Tl'Y,/, �
is
Predictive
Client: Central Crops Research Advisor
a.
Station
" w
Waste Report
70 W.
' x
Clayton, NC 27520
Clayton, 75
,
KX,t ryr31 Y''-'`
sampled:
01/15/2014 Received: 01/15/2014 completed: 02/10/2014
Johnston County
Farm: 51-74 Links to Helpful Information
Sample Information
Nutrient and Other Measurements
Nitrogen (N) (ppm) P (ppm) K (ppm) Ca (ppm) Mq (ppm)
S (ppm) Fe (ppm) Mn (ppm) Zn (ppm) Cu (ppm) B (ppm) Na (ppm) C (ppm)
Sample !D: 1A
Total N 245 396 318 144
102 76.6 5.67 24.9 4.40 0,50 146
Waste Code: AES
Description:
Total Neldahl N 851-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
Aerobic Liquid - Swine
Inorganic N pH DM {%J SS (10-5S1cm)
EC (mS1cm) CCE (%) ALE(1000 gal.) C:N
Comments:
NH4-N 6.93
NO3-N :.----------------------------------------
-------------------------•---------- - ------------- ---- ------------------
Organic N Ni (ppm) Cd (ppm) Pb (ppm) Al (ppm)
Se (ppm) Li (ppm) As (ppm) Cr (ppm) Co (ppm) Cl (ppm) Mo (ppm)
Urea
Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop (lb 1 1000 gal.)
Other Elements (lb / 1000 gal.)
Application Method
N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B MG CI Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Broadcast
3.55 4.21 3.17 2.12 0.96 0.68 0.57 0.04 0.19
0.03 T 1,22
Agronomist's Comments:
Aaron Pettit 1/30/2014
10:58 AM
North Carolina
TixtxlftiT ini46 Fwail C{}zk#1
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner ofAgriculture.

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomil FY14-WO04172
Page 2 of 2
Understanding the Waste Report* -additional information: vrww.ncapr.govlagronamilpdfilesluwaste.odf & vrww.ncavr.pov/aaronomibdifileslwasteguide_adf
Nutrient concentrations and other data on this report are provided so that waste materials can be applied at agronomic rates, thereby supplementing or reducing fertilizer application and
preventing environmental contamination. In reading the Laboratory Results section, remember that materials with < 15% dry matter (generally liquids) are analyzed as received; all
other wastes are dried first. Values in the Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop section are based on the type of waste and method of application you specify and reflect the
fact that only 40-60% of the nitrogen and 70-100% of other nutrients become available within one year of application. The remainder may or may not ever become available.
" ppm = parts per million; S = siemens; mS = millisiemens; T = trace (<0.005 lb/unit); EC = electrical conductivity; CCE = calcium carbonate equivalence; ALE = agricultural lime
equivalence; pH = acidity or basicity; DM% = % dry matter [for semi -solid and solid waste samples, this value facilitates conversion of dry -basis concentrations (ppm) back to wet -basis
of original sample]; C:N ratio = carbomnitrogen ratio.

03/26/2013
12:47 9195532142
. ... .... ..
CENTRAL CROPS RS
PAGE 01
NEW
MC 41;'2.
K
0
IT p
CEMTML GROPE Rl 'W
13223 US TOW$T
CATO531,
919T 'lWr
FAX C
FAM 919 - 1 41:
91,0*5, -2141
pAGFS WeLuom COVER
M FOR -YOUR INFORMATION PER YOUR REQUEST 0 pLE4LGERE-SPOND

3/26/2013 12:47 9195532142 CENTRAL CROPS R5 PAGE 92
Date
Division of Warrr Qualit}
Nott-Dischargt; Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Smice Ccntcr
Ralei6h. NC 27699.1617
Subject: Permitting Signature Authority
I'o Whom it Ma? Concern:
As an appropriaW Agning official for i, th mwn or
business ►tams) as designated b% 15A NCAC 211-0206.1 ht=by delegate authority to tip and certi4 - all
permit applications. reports or other permit related documents to the following staff for the following
permit tN pes (Ecw6t. sera;, land application) ami/or petmi! numbersr
Po n p rentl P tiott Pjrmjl LpIgLUMIt Number
i
,-,- lh rCet
if you have any questions, please contact me at the following:
Permittee/Applicarn name (please print);
Title:
Complete mailing address: — S' 7
city: 4 5� _ staro. C Zip;
Telephone number: ('rL)33/`i/ Facsimile number:
'4incerely,
All Z72 &

2142 CENTRAL CRAPS R5 PACE 03
-�� 03/26/2613 12: 47 919553. ., ..
Animus Waste Management System Operator Designation Farm
WPCSOCC
NCAC 15A 8F .0201
� r
Facility/Farm Name: ,-� n. / • / . '* ca l t', a cr �e �-
Pernut #: Facility lD#: '_..L— County:
Operator In Charge (OIC)
Name:
Last Jr. Sr. Or.
Cert Type / Nu
`� Work Phone;
Signature: Date. 3.�.,____
'-I certify that I agree to my esignation ag the Operator in Chtuge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the rules
and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities set forth in ISA NCAC 08F .0203 and failing to do so can result in Disciplinary
Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Back-up Operator In Charge (Back-up OIC) (Optional)
First Middle last Jr. Sr, CM
Cert Type / Number-, Work Phone: (_
Signature:,
Date _
"I certify that I agree to my designation as Beck -up Operator in Charge for the Facility noted. i understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities set Forth in 15A NCAC 08F .0203 and Failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Cerification Commission."
Owner/Perinittee Name: Cvrer�tn AA ,,s ea -7y &IP'd A•_s Arsesv� gar
Phone #; L915 Fait#:(.,III xi Y 2-
Signarrire: Date: 3
(Owner or th ZCCI agent)
Mail or fax to: WPCSOCC
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699.1618
Fax: 9198
(Retain a copy of this form for your records)
Rnivil )007

Bernard, Jane
From: Bernard, Jane
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 9:48 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Subject: Current info needed
Attachments: NCSwineGeneralPermit09.pdf; Signature A Letter.doc; 15a ncac 02t .0106.pdf
Randy,
I have attached a copy of the general permit. Please print it and retain for your use.
Your Certificate of Coverage (Permit) I cannot separate from the batch file without printing. If you would, please, send
me a fax # and I'll fax it to you.
The General Permit and COC combined with your Waste Utilization Plan are all part of your "Permit". Please read them
thoroughly and place them in your records.
At this time J. R. Evans is listed as the Manager. In order to designate an Operator in Charge, J. R. Evans would be the
one to sign off on the change. In order to change the signing official a completed Permitting Signature Authority needs
to be completed (attached also). Both the Permitting Signature Authority and the Operator in Charge can be sent in
together.
The current permit cycle ends September 30, 2014. Sometime in March 2014 (maybe April) you should receive a
package containing all the information needed to complete your permit renewal.
That would be the time to change your population from #'s to steady state live weight if you choose. Otherwise an
updated waste plan is needed at this time that reflects the current population and crops. The same person that will be
designated as "Signature Authority" is the same person who will need to sign the Waste Utilization Plan.
All of our forms can be found at the following link:
http://Portal.ncdenr.orp/web/wq/a ps/afo/apes
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at the #'s below.
JANE R. BERNARD
Environmental Specialist
Aquifer Protection Section
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Office- [phone] ext. 4236
Cell- [phone]
Fax- [phone]
E-mail- iane.bernard(Wncdenr.gov
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

03/27/2013 12:33 9195532142 CENTRAL CROPS PS PACE 02
5
Stationary Sprinkler System Calibration and Uniformity Data Sheet Ir , 10, / Rr old
Date: !2- 9"l Land owner: S Farm No. S'L2
y
Manufacturer's SpscIfica Ions: bun/Sprinkler Mode' v; ' v "type
Nozzle Claeter in.
m
1. Measure Pressure (measured from at [seat tm sprinklers)
b. Pressure (GurdSprinkler)1
c. Pressure (GurVSprinkler) 2 pal Wetted
.
d. Promre (Gun/Sprinkler) 3 psi Radha
e. A"Me pressure 7d _per
2. Mansur+ W~ Radius (refer to Figure 8 or figure above)
Sprinkler 1
a. Side 1 average distends from sprinkler to weasel radius ft
Sprinkler 2
- ft
Sp nkler 3
, ft
b. Side 2 average dlstance from gun to wafted radius f_ ft_
tt
ft
c Side 3 average distance from sprinkler to wetted radius �L - ft
it
ft
d. Side 4 everage distance frorrr gun to wetted radius , ft
' ft
_ S ft
a. Average wetted radius ft
ft
_ ft
f. Compare sprinlder radius for 1 and 2 sprinkler 1 (2.$),jEk 1t
X 1oa-
sprinkler 2 (2.9) IS_ ft
Zvi %
is lf. between 90% and 110%7 -0yes no
g. If ~yes', avereps the wattdld radius for sprinklers 1 and 2 and mult[ply by 2 to obtaln
wetted diameter (W D) l LL ft
(if `rW, repeal for sprinkler 3 and compere against sprinklers 1 or 2 to see N behreen 00% and 100%)
h. Wetted diameter from manufacturer's chart using pressure in 1,9. 1 f1
i. Percent difference = rreld measured (2.9) ft
-.. _ X 1170 a %
manufacturer's chart (2,11)/"ai�_ ft
la 2•i between 85% and 115%7 —lam yes —no (if "no" contact technical irrigation specialist)
10

03/27/2013 12.33 9195532142 CENTRAL CROPS RS PAGE 03
STATIONARY AND TRAVELING
IRRIGATiON SYSTEMS
Statlonary Sprinkler System Calibration and Uniformity Data Sheet (continued)
3. Delerrnine Flory Rats, a
a. Pressure from 1.e. _1 A psi
b. Flow rate from manufacturer`s chart ILA gpm
c. Flow rote from irrigation design documentationlwetiabie acreage documentation /g gpm
e. Per+eent difference = field measured (3.b) /f. 4 gpm
X100a- '?F%
Woumentetion (3_c) 4C & gpm r
Is 3.e between 90% and 110% 7 4" yes _ no (if "no" contact technical Irrigation specialist)
llmms UnRormity
4. Calculate Psresnt OwMap and Check Prwoure
a. Sprinkler Spacing ,g�r_ ft
b. Sprinkler Spacing (% of WD) = Sprinkler Spacing (4. a) -'LU ft X 100 96
Wetted Diameter (2.9) Z[ ft a
fs Sprinkler Spacing (% of WD) (4.b) between 50% and 70%? yes no
c. Nozzle pressure from 1.e. __�Z Psi
d. Wnlmum pressure from manufacturees chart for sprinkler model and nozzle _,91 psi
e. Maximum pressure from manufacturer's chart for sprinkler model and nozzle 5�0 psi
Is Nozzle pressure (4.c) between the minimum (4.d) and maximum (4.e) chart pressure?Bg —no
If the answer to either question Is "no" then unNormity is not acoeptable. Contact an irrigation technical
specialist.

03/27/2013 12:33 9195532142 CENTRAL CROPS RS PAGE 04
Stationary sprinkler System Calibration and Uniformity Data Sheet r• !';f
Date: - 3 - / a Land owner: Lt%C .SJ_ J __ Farm No. CF/-
Manufaclurses Speciffm2one: Gun/Sprinkier Model ., ' Noels TV$*
Nozzle Diameter _ In.
1, Measure Pressure (measured from at least two sprinklers)
b. Pressure (Gun/Sprinkler) 1 49 it psi
c. Pressure (GunlSprfnklar) 2 -7 A? Psi . YYwtbari...
d, Pressure (Gun/Sprinkler) 3 20 psi Rrsdiut
e, Avsrage pressure � pea
2. Wasure Wit6ad Radius (refer to Figure 8 or fl4ura above)
`
Sprinkler 1
a. aide 1 average distance from epr+nkier to wetted radius _ x4rk
Sprinkler 2
Rp
Sprinkler 3
ft
b. Side 2 average distance from gun to wetted nxfta ft
sf, ft
ft
c Sloe 3 average distance from sprinkler to wetted radke _ , _ ft
n
it
d. Side a average distance from gun.to wetted radius ft
S'r� tt
ft
e, Average wetted radius ft
ft
ft
f. Compare sprinkler radius fbr 1 and 2 sprinkler 1 (2.e) k R
X100103' %
sprinkler 2 (2,9) S ft
Is 21 between 90% end 110%? —Zye9 no
g. if "yes', average the wetted radius for sprinklers 1 and 2 and mul*y by 2 to obtain
wetted diameter (WD) /e'f R
(if "no', repent for sprinkler 3 and compare against sprinklers 1 or 2 to see of between 90% end 100%)
h. Wetted diameter from manufaetures chart using pressure in 1.e. fx f ft
i. Percent dWerer" = ►ield measured (2.g) —Lsft
X100. �2. %
manufacturers chart Rh)/A # ft
Is 2J between 85% and 115%? to -yes _no lit'no' conlaCt tachnkBl irrigation specialist)
10

03/27/2013 12:33 9195532142 CENTRAL CROPS RS PAGE 05
STATIONARY AND TRAVELING
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
Stationary Sprinkler System Callbratlon and Uniformity Data Sheet (continued)
S. Determine Flew Rah, Q
a. Pressure from 1.a. 6 .9_ psi
b. Flow rate from manufacturers chart 1,tLfgpm
e. Flow rate from irrigation design documer>tationAwettable eavve documentation gpm
e. Percent difference m field mea8uned Rb) -1-5,a- gPm
X100=_%
ooG mentatlon (3.c)—/-A— gPm #JI, ,,, 0,4 r
Is 10 between 90°A and 110% ? ✓ yes _ no (if'na" contact technkW irrigation specialist)
Assess Uniformity
4. Calculate Percent QMap and Check Presusurs
a. Sprinkler Spaoing i 4 ft
b. Sprinkler Spacing (% of WD) 0 Sprinkler Spacing (4.e)-J� 10 ft
,
Wetted Diameter (2-g)&A R X100. 11�,%
IS Sprinkler Spacing (% of WD) (4.b) between t3 % and 7D%? ✓yea no
C. Nozzle pr+essum from i.e. 4--L psi
d. Minimum pressure from manufacturers chart for sprinkler model and nozde psi
e. Ktdximum pressure from manufacturers chart for sprinkler model and nozzle psi
Is Nozzle pressure (4,c) bet~ the minimum (4.d) and maximum (4.e) chart pressure? t% yes _no
if the answer to either question Is 'no" then uniforn* Is not aoceptoble. ConbNA an Irrlgadan technical
specialist.

Bernard, Jane
From:
Blanton, Christine
Sent:
Monday, March 08, 2010 4:58 PM
To:
Bernard, Jane
Cc:
Larick, Keith
Subject:
AWS510074 - NC State Research Farm
Jane,
I received a couple of calls from James Pope at the NC State research farm. The facility is permitted for 334
Feeder -Finish. He was asking about what he needed to do to increase his permitted number of animals. I
explained to him that he could not increase the number of animals without putting into place a waste treatment
system that satisfied the performance criteria for new/expanding swine operations. He asked about a
"research permit" and I explained that we didn't have one. We do modify permits to allow for pilot studies of
treatment systems, but that is not done with an expansion. He further asked about if the 334 number was an
annual average. I said that it is — taking weekly stocking records, the annual average must be 334 or less.
Mr. Pope then called back and asked about change of operation type. He said that what he truly has are wean
pigs that he is raising to finish. I explained that prior to changing operation types that he must get a permit
modification. I was clear that under no circumstances would the Division issue a permit for an animal
operation type that would exceed the current SSLW. He asked about the equivalent number of Wean -Finisher
and I told him it is around 390. 1 stated more than once that it is extremely important that he stock the same
animal type for which he is permitted. It could easily lead him to be out of compliance if he is permitted for 390
Wean -Finish but he is really operating Feeder -Finish animals. I was very clear that he CANNOT exceed the
permitted SSLW on an average annual basis.
I told Mr. Pope that he needed to send in a request to change the operation type. Because the operation type
changes frequently with the research project underway, he was concerned about this being a burdensome
task. I told him that it is still necessary. I will check with Keith to see if there is a way to write the permit that
will prevent the University from having to modify their permit and waste plan with every changing research
project. Perhaps the WUP can also be written to allow for flexibility in the various op types.
I am scheduled to get a call back from Mr. Pope on Tues 319 after I have talked with Keith.
Chiistine Q 03(an.ton
NC Division of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
919-715-6627 phones 919-715-0588 tax
PLEASE NOTE; My new e-mail address is Chris tine. Blantonancdenr.00v
NOTICE: Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.

�ALIT.-; AA
TWX
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
October 1, 2009
NC State University
Central Crops Research Station
Campus Box 8007
Raleigh, NC 276958007
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510074
Central Crops Research Station
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear NC State University:
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to NC State University, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system in accordance with General Permit A WG 100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Central Crops Research Station, located in Johnston County, with a swine animal
capacity of no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: 334 Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS510074 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions_ in this permit.- Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
One
No hCarolina
)atura!!y

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 1I.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Re1eigh, NC National
Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at: www,erh.nonn.gov/er/r.t,/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Ra,ei,r, Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Slncarely,
Aa
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
CC' (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS510074)
AFO Notebooks
Multiple Integrators

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary: Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a .100-foot. separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or, any wetted area, of a
spray field. hh
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWIVIP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right,to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process: ,Unless such a request is made .within 30 days, this COC shall be final; and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall, cease, within, four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information'for your county by calling the Rwoiah, NO National
Weather Service office at (919). 515-8209, or by visiting their website at: www,orh,noaa.gov/sr/rah/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Relelgh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning,this
COCor the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
/^SJ nn core Iy,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for ail ccs)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Johnston County Health Department
,Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central,Files'(Permit No. AWS510074) .
AFO Notebooks
Multiple Integrators

k[rwdmnd application extension request]
Subject: [Fwd: land. application extension request]
From: Jane Bernard <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 08:04:50 -0400
To: Keith Larick <[e-mail]>, Christine Blanton <[e-mail]>
Keith,
I thought I should run this by you. I realize there is room in the general permit
for innovative systems. I spoke with Eddie Humphrey with Johnston County Soil &
water. We both have the same opinion in reference to the window. The window for
Soybean ended 9/15. In most fields the plants have already began to yellow and
drop their leaves. It is a safe assumption that very little if any Nitrogen will
be utilized by the plant at this late date. Please let me know how I should
proceed.
Have a good Monday.
Jane
Subject: land application extension request
From: "Garry Grabow <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:12:20 -0400
To: <[e-mail]>
CC: "Sanjay Shah" <[e-mail]>
Jane,
Thanks for returning my call. I'll try to give a description of what we are doing along with our request for an
extension of the normal land application window for soybeans.
We are evaluating a subsurface drip irrigation system alongside a sprinkler system in an approximately 1 acre
field ( about % acre in drip and ''/z acre in sprinkler) adjacent to the hog lagoon at the Central Crops research
station in Clayton. As part of that experiment, we are conducting trials in which we sample ammonia
emissions from the land associated with both systems.
We would like to do one last application on Oct 20 for the purposes of collecting some more ammonia
emission data. The soybeans were planted June 24th. There is still a PAN balance and we would apply
between .25 and .33 inches (about 13 to 18 lbs per acre).
Please let me know if there is any more information I need to provide.
Thank you.
Garry Grabow
Garry Grabow PhD, PE
Biological and Agricultural Engineering
NC State University
Campus Box 7625
Raleigh, NC 27695-7625
919.513.7348
fax [phone]
http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/people/faculty/gigrabow/
1 of 2 10/6/2008 9:29 AM

`[fwdl6nd application extension request]
Jane Bernard cjane.bernardPncmail.net>
Environmental Specialist
DENR/D WQ
Aquifer Protection Section
land application extension request.eml Content -Type: message/rfc822
Content -Encoding: 7bit
2 of 2 10/6/2008 9:29 AM

Central Crops Research Station
ds I SW 17 Lf
Subject: Central Crops Research Station
From: "Humphrey, Edward - Smithfield, NC"<[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:33:39 -0600
To: "Jane Bernard" <[e-mail]>
Jane, I met with James Pope this morning. The following will update you on what we discussed.
To: James Pope
Central Crops Research Station
Clayton, NC 27542
From: Eddie Humphrey
Johnston County SWCD
Re: Erosion Control Around Lagoon
Date: Nov. 20, 2007
This memo is to follow up my visit of this morning. As we discussed you should slope the eroded
banks back slightly and seed them with a mixture of tall fescue and annual ryegrass. Mulch the
seeded area and cover with erosion control netting. Mow the area to a height no less than 4-5 inches
as needed. Refrain from the use of Glyphosate herbicides around the lagoon. Continue with your
efforts to trap the burrowing animals and fill the burrows once they are inactive.
If I can be of any further assistance let me know.
Edward Humphrey
Johnston S WCD
1 of 1 11/26/2007 8:36 AM

October 28, 2004
Mr. John Hunt
Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Dear Mr. Hunt,
North Carolina State University is a land- College of Agriculture and
grant university and a constituent institution Life Sciences
of The University of North Carolina
Central Crops Research Station
13223 US 70 West
Clayton, NC 27520
�j NOV I 2U t�
�L1 l.Hl? RALE10;4 tEQVIAL Offic
In response to telephone conversations with Eddie Humphries at the Johnston County Soil &
Water Conservation office on October 28, 2004, Central Crops Research Station is informing you
of a change in our swine operation.
The Nutrient Management Plan calls for our facility (#51-74) to have an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 334 feeder to finish swine. We have had no animals for three
weeks while cleaning the bams. Our plans call for 64 feeder pigs to come to the facility on
November 11., 2004,
Another professor wants to put 25 sows and 1 boar at Central Crops as soon as possible. The
sows will be bred using 25 year old frozen semen. After weaning their pigs the sows will be
conditioned and sold. The small pigs will remain for further research. The 25 sows will be at the
facility for 5 to 6'months. The boar will be here only 2 months. This should be a one time only
project.
If you have any questions or need further information please contact James Pope at 919-553-
7696.
Sincerely,
Dr. Reid Evans
Superintendent
Central Crops Research Station

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
NC State University
Central Crops Research Station
13223 US 70 West
Clayton NC 27520
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510074
Central Crops Research Station
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear NC State University:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 10, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to NC
State University, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS510074 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Central Crops Research Station, located in Johnston County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than an annual average of 334 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land
as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to
Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are
unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced
by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeRina
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section - Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal OppodunitylAffirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarohna
,Vaturally

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties_ in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510074
APS Central Files

O� W,gr�A Michael F. Easley, Governor
O� QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
co 7
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
NC State University
Central Crops Research Station
13223 US 70 West
Clayton NC 27520
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510074
Central Crops Research Station
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear NC State University:
On April 28, 2003, .the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
- Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste.Operation,General•-
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 10, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to NC
State University, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS510074 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Central Crops Research Station, located in Johnston County, _with an animal
capacity of no greater than an annual average of 334 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land
as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to
Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are
unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced
by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
Iaws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. 0*�
NZUE WNR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per MRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
" "-Quality Staff maybe reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
_1� . - -
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510074
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 31, 2000
NC State University
Central Crops Research Station
13223 US 70 West
Clayton NC 27520
Attn: George B. Clark
A4 • • 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510074
Central Crops Research Station
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear George B. Clark:
In accordance with your application received on December 20, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to NC State University, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Central Crops Research Station, located in Johnston County,
with an animal capacity of no greater than 334 Feeder to Finish (or research swine of equal steady state
live weight) and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS510074
Central Crops Research Station
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
a
1, "EHtfig
Since ,
,E Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
Raleigh:Regional=Office, Water-Qualitv-Section-T
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NC State University
Central Crops Research Station
13223 US 70 West
Clayton NC 27520
Dear NC State University:
A��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT -AND. NATURAL_ RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
- R RALEIGH HEG*C `IAL OFFICE
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 51_7.4
Johnston Qounty
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

E
State of North Carolina R E USN D f0�1
Department of Environment and Natural Resow
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) ,Charge Petmttbn9
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please review the
information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by
the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Central Crops Research Station
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: NC State University T
1.3 Mailing address: 13223 US 70 West
City, State: Clayton NC Zip: 27520
Telephone Number (include area code): 553-214
1.4 County where facility is located: Johnston
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Hwy 70 at Wake/Johnston Cty Line
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): George Clark
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 12/01/94
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 51 (county number); 74 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
300- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? ®yes; [�J no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine
No. of Animals
Type of Poultry
No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder
n ") J 1
0 Layer
0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Non -Layer
0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on
the farm:
No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 51- 74

i
0
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 6.30 : Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 63
2.4 Number Cfra:go:o storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? (YES)or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
ES �+r NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? I / ` I
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? az — / !IX
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
✓ 3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
✓ 3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
J 3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
✓ 3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
✓ 3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan. „
✓3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
.� .3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
&/3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance PIan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 51 - 74

Facility Number: 51 - 74
Facility Name: Central Crops Research Station
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICA
WARECEIVED
1$
-floN
IDEC 2 01999
r ' Non-DiBChng. Pemlitung
U
1 and Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for [s.'\ QN, - I �,!L % � Tt 7 (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application a not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be ret d to me as incomplete. tt h
Signature r-�� Date y� 1
J
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
GI�Nc`\---
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for i x L-S . (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate A complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returoee as incomplete.
Signature
Date R$ ie�
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 51- 74

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
February 25. 2000
NC State University
Central Crops Research Station
13223 US 70 West
Clayton NC 27520
Attn: George Clark
IT-
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS510074
Additional Information Request
Central Crops Research Station
Animal Waste Operation
Johnston County
Dear George Clark:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Plcase address the following by March 26, 2000:
1. This facility is certified as a 300 Feeder to Finish swine, however your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) is
written for 334 Feeder to Finish swine. If you would like to be permitted for 300 Feeder to Finish swine.
please notify me in a written response to this letter. However, if you would like to be permitted 334 Feeder
to Finish swine please submit a new certification form for 334 Feeder to Finish swine. Please also submit a
statement from a technical specialist that there has been no expansion at this facility in order to increase the
number of animals to 334.
2. A site inspection of this facility conducted on July 20, 1999 shows that waste was being applied to Coastal
Bermuda grass and Timothy, Orchard or Rye grass. These crops are not currently listed in your Waste
Utilization Plan (WUP). If you are now, or intend to, apply waste to these crops please have your WUP
revised to show them.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before March 26, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
erely,
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Cenler, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
December 1, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
NC State University
Central Crops Research Station
13223 US 70 West
CIayton NC 27520
Farm Number:i51= 74-"�
Dear NC State University:
A61LT?Wj
IT 0 0
4612
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Central Crops Research Station, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has six 60 days to
submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws
(Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified
by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at [phone] extension 364 or
Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely, P5
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number SI -- 7'-f _
Farm Name: C ` c-v-9 Fs � s
On -Site Representative:_,Amcs Pof
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: J-, 0 u J-T-
Date of site visit: Lt ?--1 1_13
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3-
Date of most recent WUP: I Annual farm PAN deficit: 8 o pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
(A 6 tationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part 1 exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D21D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3,,before completing computational table in Part II1).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over appiication of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

DRAFT
Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number 51 -
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER',2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
(j
/-z 3
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. if pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

U LV
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
September 18, 1997
Mr. .James Pope
Central Crops Research Station
13223 US 70 West
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 51-74
Central Crops Research Station
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Pope:
On August 27, 1997, Mr. Charles Alvarez from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that your swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that your waste
lagoons had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the
inspection the facility were found to be in compliance with the
facility's wastewater permit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your
cooperation. If you have any questions regarding this inspection
please call Mr. Charles Alvarez at [phone].
Sincerely
�1L�J�l
J y G rrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Johnston County Health Department
Mr. Kenneth York, Johnston County Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
RRO Files
3900 Barren Drive, Suite 101 • Raleigh, NC 27609
Voice [phone] 6 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affmnative Action Employer
50% recycled 110% pooconsumer paper

. � `��� ��-s ❑DSWC�Animal`Feedlot�(
outine O Cfrmnlaint O Follow-uo of DWO i
Facility Number S
ollow-up of DSWC review O Other �
�rrr�rw�i ur
Date of Inspection 7 9
Time of Inspection t y 6 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Elstered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:I.25 for I hr .15 min)) Spent on Review
ertified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:................................................................................................_....................................................
Farm Name:....... l t .l. .S....... ...1�Xj1P,�........ .�t !:LrIA :4 �?.........�ra� u'l,?.:�....... County :.................. �.r�iN s��._.............. ......... ....»
LandOwner Name:.. .C..:0.6...................................................................... ......... Phone No: .... ............... 5.-1.-4./ ..........................
Facility Conctaet:........;................. P.PP:.................. Title:... *. .. !! Kam.`.. Phone No:........ S.Sa=... 7. l k..........
MailingAddress: ....... 022.1........... U.S........712 .................................. .............we— ...................... ..22-
OnsiteRepresentative:..... ..................1 ?..... ........... I ...... ..................... Integrator:......................... /».................................. ..........
Certified Operator:.............. .................... ....................................,�i
Location of Farm:
..............3�..........�0..............................�^.��......'......... �.,.s a,✓........�. ................
....�..............................................................................................4
r<.......Y...........................r........................................................................................!........................................ ........................... .......................................
I.,atitudet.:Tl Longitude 6b
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[Discharge originated at: ❑ L,agoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ff o
❑ Yes [9 IGo
❑ Yes 9-90
❑ Yes U�Nb
❑ Yes [9-N
❑ Yes UK
❑ Yes ,,,, I� o
❑ Yes 0<01
Continued on back

Facility Number:...,F.l..... ........ 7.t .
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (I.agoolls and/or Holding fonds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
2 . t "7, o
❑ Yes [jK o
❑ Yes lyd No
❑ Yes @"No
❑ Yes 13.4
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 034co
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes (;M
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......... b_9f:.n_i� ................... �fsfc{1.......................14 �t.A E.................. �^�..N.:'.SQ !(�'I......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For CrLifed Facilit5e Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
drawings
y YES answers and/or any'"
3 regu�R�' app1'ca>ll div li��q.
❑ Yes M$1Qo
❑ Yes &go
❑ Yes E]INo
❑ Yes L1a No
❑ Yes E;Ko
❑ Yes M-No
❑ Yes MNO
❑ Yes • DIG
❑ Yes [i-To
❑ Yes [Wo
❑ Yes ❑c•'No
❑ Yes [<o
is or anyother comments_
.^�5� �•�f ,YI T:C iH ^t '::�k� Snit.kr u.," S _ Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/inspector Signature: r� .�. _" Date: �P?A Y
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

d.aSrAtrs
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
September 5, 1997
Central Crops Research Station
13223 US 70 West
Clayton, NC 27520
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summary and Corrective Action Recommendation
Central Crops research Station Facility No. 51-74
Johnston County
Dear Manager,
On August 25, an Operation Review was conducted of Central Crops research Station, facility no. 51-
70. This Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all
registered livestock operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a
second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was not being discharged to -the waters of the State,
and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and
operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator. The following observance and questions were
discovered and noted for corrective action or response:
Since the farm is a research facility, the receiving crops change frequently and the Waste Utilization
Plan(WUP) does not reflect all receiving crops. Senate Bill 352 addresses this problem stating that as long
as valid research is being conducted and water quality standards are not compromised there is no need to
amend the WUP.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need
additional information.
Sincer ly,
16 e, � '16 )Zj<
Margar O'Keefe
Environmental Engineer I*
cc: Johnston Soil and Water Conservation District
Judy Garrett, Water Cluality Regional Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101 • Raleigh. NC 27609
Voice [phone] • FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled ! 10% post-comumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 12, 1996
NC State University
Central Crops Research Station
13223 US 70 West
Clayton NC 27520
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Central Crops Research Station
Facility ID#: 51-74
Johnston County
Dear Farm Owner:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
.Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 91gn33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. res on Howard, Jr., P.E. D' ctor
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687,NAW FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Vf C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr.. Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A&re�
C�EHNF=1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 9, 1995
Mr. -James Pope
NCSU-Central Crops Research
13223 U.S. 70 West
Clayton, North Carolina 27520--2127
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Swine Operation
U.S. Highway 70
Facility No. 51-74
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Pope:
On October 18, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh. Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection of the'subject animal facility. This inspection
is part of the Division's efforts to determine potential problems associated with
animal waste disposal systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your facility was
not discharging to the surface waters of the state. In addition, no manmade
pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully
discharging wastewater) were observed. As a result, your facility was found to
be in compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of Environmental Management
Is required to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect the natural
resources of the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may also
result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring immediate submission of
a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that you
are required to have an approved animal waste management plan by December 1997.
This plan must be Certified by a designated technical. specialist or a
professional engineer. For a listing of certified technical specialists or
assistance with your waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional office appreciates your cooperation in this matter.
If you have any questions regarding your inspection please call Buster Towell at
[phone].
Sincerely,
J y E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
CC. Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and,Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett -Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

i
73ar7/
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
February 9, 1995
M E M O R A N D U M
TO:
THROUGH:
DIANNE WILLIAMS LBURN
KEN SCHUSTER.
FIDE PuOPY
FROM: JUDY GARRETT a
SUBJECT: NCSU Central Crops Research Station Hog Operation
RL 94-13, $100 fine, Johnston County
Attached is a letter from George Clark, Superintendent of the
Central Crops Research Station. You and I discussed this situation
a few weeks ago. The Station is currently constructing additional
facilities which will increase the design capacity of the facility
from less than 200 hogs to 300 hogs. The facility was only
required to register in accordance with 15A 2H .0217 as a result of
the increase. Therefore, the civil penalty assessment was
erroneous.
We recommend that the civil penalty assessment be withdrawn.
..If I can be of assistance, please advise.
cc: David Holsinger

i
13223 US 70 West
Clayton, NC 27520
North Carolina State University
Central Crops Research Station
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
January 25, 1995
N C Division Environmental Management
Regional Water Quality
3800 Garret Drive
Raleigh, NC 7609
Ms. Judy Garrett,
George B. Clark
Superintendent
The following information is provided with regard to our telephone
conversation on this date concerning Case No. RL 94-13, and the
need for registration of the animal feedlot operation located at
Central Crops Research Station prior to December 31, 1993.
The swine facility, including the animal waste management system at
Central Crops, was originally designed for 200 animals. The
facility was used as a boar testing facility from 1973 until March
of 1994 at which time it was shut down. There have only been a few
occasions when the swine facility operated at full capacity of 200
,animals. Based on this fact, Central Crops was not required to be
permitted by DEM pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217(c) prior to December
31, 1993.
0 As a result of new research emphasis for this facility, a
registration form for animal feedlot operations was submitted on
12-1-94. This form was inadvertently submitted in place of a
request for certification for an expanded animal waste management
system. I am now under the impression that certification will
encompass registration. Our current need for certification exists
because the previous research project involving fewer than 200
swine has terminated and is being replaced with a protect that will
entail approximately 300 head of swine. In our effort to ensure
that this new protect complies with existing regulations, the
registration form was submitted.
North Carolina State University is a land-grant university and a constituent institution of The University of North Carolina.

-2-
Based on the above information, we request that the civil fine
assessed against Central Crops be rescinded. Because there is a
need to implement this new study as soon as possible, we appreciate
anything that you can personally do to facilitate this request.
Sincerely,
CENTRAL CFjORS ,.RESEARCH STATION
a
George Clark
Superintendent
cc: Mr. Paton Kelly
Dr. Charles Stanislaw

Type of Visit: 10 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (5�?toutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Timc:jjQjF0M County: �OhN
Farm Name: �4"k'�p ('fp,ps k•ejP th S-V oo Owner Email:
Owner Name: Nr ,5 v Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 93a a3 US 70 Bps W
Region: P ' '7
Facility Contact: Title: ns�manjqqw— Phone:
Onsite Representative:Integrator: Jnd,
Certified Operator: C* r(1� Certification Number: IINT3
Back-up Operator: �i vj' i �Jf Certification Number: �8790
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design
Current
Swine
Capacity
Pop:
WctyyPouitry
Capacity
Pl1op.
Cattle
Capacity
Pop.
r`'�fNUM "I¢ i #
I�pISW,Ii(t1UMU
tf[ a
IlflilttI fto
Iiht4�3iA
OUX111l.�
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
pr al'oult '
;
Ca aci ,
Po .
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
—
Other
i
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes J�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 Yes" No
[—]Yes [N No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
DNA ONE
❑NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: TJ - Date of Inspection: _77441 [
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 154 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ONE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 10 a 0
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):Ih�j
Observed Freeboard (in): Jrj
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 10 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes � No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes bt] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [S No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
_Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need D Yes 5a No
❑ NA
[] NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYpe(s): Carl
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes C@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[�j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records &_Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other;
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes F] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

FacHit'i Number: - Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA []NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
rANo
❑ NA
D NE
❑Yes
❑No
❑NA
[2NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes
No
❑NA
❑NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes C' No
❑ Yes [X-No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
omments (refer, to question #}:lExplain°any, AYES'answers'and/or,any!additionalkrecoffiinendations or any; .other 6' minents.* ';'
I lh.�. q ti.3 I Ur _. !. I! d I i,. 14rn6i€€e.• � -,gym ! �,,...,I d� � '� �iiii,c a7111�11 i 1' I iln � -' � I I
ifao'r1b.�minarQ4ni.fon�lilLi"Inl�nhFownrr�ilnin.a�Inoh�nnacrii�.ninriilifinnolin ana,n i..n..e oo A� h���,il,�,lk1L`{iP�l.�.ue�ll'I�aisr.:����� ,.1<,(.irF'.i, � .I.I�'v -._ ._
haS Awnenoul coiAjj4 ed..hovcs, -VaL,v nflds 6Aef brth,ed�acoo
r
Cu- 6 has- An�maj �/fJ3Ce"Coc", ©lc-eo/ '1 I'afte
r
as- S[ od t✓ LS IR -AG 118 , a r j -M ,54,d e- 0 WM Ar COIL dV!� i jecfol- a w/a� ff ello-
Qy, Cal l�ldc, -7 v .9t
Oclwm + -WINII WA he, e
alp YVo� sam Ins t &o dayf t ���ge9ef ������ sa�,�l e �� v� e � s���►lie
d �� `� tin � a '�� w W n on br1 d � e� fie O)A, r,� lesPaA ,
�voo.�sas 3
la t 116 �D o� . d
fj t OOl n A c��a tt- a boil` -7 gj .10 1 -d 019,
Yvoo��� 1I 1 �
rvoa &mil Lthl (I
So�j � t,.�191aS g�
Plea
Reviewer/inspector Name: � �n,Ptel Phone: ��Q �q�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3 U m �Schpf i$ neden r.9ov
Date: 1 a 018
21412015

Type of Visit: gCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: IMIS-117] ArrivalTime: �% Q Departure Time: ; County:
Farm Name: �;Q/(� I I^fQ�s _f Le j S`�,0) Owner Email:
Owner Name: N(,t(J Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 13013 us 70 BJ/ Y Cla y6i
Facility Contact: G7 �6k t_yso l Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: CA" N?1f )29
Back-up Operator: I pAuij �
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Region:
Integrator:
Thd—
Certification Number: UND
Certification Number:
Longitude:
C*urrent
r
Design
gurrent
Design Current
Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity
Pop.
7Design
Finish
La er
DairyCow
Feeder
Eeeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
o Finish
r
Dairy Heifer
i
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr I;oultr
Ca acit
P,o P.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
on -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
IPullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turke Poults
Other
Other
Discharzes and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes U No
❑ Yes Fj No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Cbllection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? 0 Yes CR No [] NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [] No 0 NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): aig
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes [,�Z No
❑ NA
[] NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes KvI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes � No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes � No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes Dd No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes � No
❑ NA
0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): CDIA iW Sny- C$fir' SGotfloy
13. Soil Type(s): 1Q
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes C3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes CK No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
[�j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
15� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes � No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] No
I
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
{gN NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continuer!

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
[Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes R] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes '0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No
[:]Yes ® No
[:]Yes ® No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer. to,yuestion a#) 'Explain any YES answer§land/oi. any, additional. recommendations or: any,other eomr#tents l, .�
U i
ae.dra!win s,of�facili mtogbetterexplainfs__ituataons':{useadditionai ages,as;necessa ._,
w1 �� a � ����I eE;� b��ire 61611�� Q+�T�a��s has rnve- howsl�a rt°&Lrfed,
Sa,.e n&-da i � ao jt bit wordme- I'm a017
a
oX Please Ca a
L.owftSo(v,e o 10w6 p0ma o s ov-- �
5-la q4 �,�3a D,®7 Mhe, otVE40 M6s i h
114(01r (a wtv)V o O�d9
u bl l t� woo(vta l 0,09
-7t �a aa, ;mner'b�1 WO-emowed s�ce 1Oil- /84-,
�9
NoQ-eor `fa;1"t40 Carr brAt anoC -�04'ee 5
JLioP9e
pUD400-f-- o� qI'-►u6Oneadw(poe Of/
ill+hg �s onto dale
Reviewer/Inspector Name:(i') on S(`hp I ��^ Phone: q )q 7ql- 9a3 �
Al
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: NOY I�JLO17
Page 3 of 3 J f n SchifiW9 ncderl ,. 9 0L/ /Z4/l 015

Ha1,14 (,1311�
Animal Waste Management System Operator Designation Form
Faeility/Farm Name: V_4l41T '!
4V& 00
Permit #: 51-7! '
Operator In Charge (OTC)
WPCSOCC
NCAC 15A 8F .0201
FacilityTD#: 5- 1 _ -7y_ County: �h&doj
Name: G e/& P-% /7e /r, rt
First / Middle Last Jr, Sr, etc.
Cert Type / Number: h ? ` 73 Work Phone:(
e
Signature: Date:
`9 certify that I agree to my designation as the Operator in Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the rules and regulations
pertaining to the responsibilities set forth in tSA NCAC 08F .0203 and failing to do so can result in Disciplinary Actions by the Water
Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Back-up Operator In Charge (Back-up OIC) (Optional)
(Sau
S� Name: MOVfS LQSSt `%
First Middle Last Jr, 3r, etc.
Cert Type / Number: q$�o�t<P Work Phone: ( )
Signature: Date;
"I certify that I agree to my designation as Back-up Operator in Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the rules and
regulations pertaining to the responsibilities set forth in 15A NCAC 08F .0203 and failing to do so can result in Disciplinary Actions by the
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Owuer/Permittee Name:
Phone #: (
Signature:
(Owner or authorized agent)
Fax#:
Date:
Mail, fax or email the WPCSOGC =;1618 MaillService Ceuter; 'Raleigh, NC 27699-1618 Fax: [phone]
original to: Email:: certadminCancdenr_ eon
Mail or fax a copy to the Asheville
Fayetteville
Mooresville
appropriate Regional Office: 2090 US Hwy 70
225 Green St
610 E Center Ave
Swannanoa 28778
Suite 714
Suite 301
Fax: 82&299.7043
Fayetteville 28301-5043
Mooresville 28115
Phone: 828.296,4500
Fax: [phone]
Fax, 704.663.6040
Phoen: 910.433.3300
Phone, 704.663.1699
Washington
Wilmington
Winston-Salem
943 Washington Sq Mall
127 Cardinal Dt
450 W. Hanes Mall Rd
Washington 27889
Wilmington 28405-2845
Winston-Salem 27105
Fax:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Raleigh
3800 Barrett Dr
Raleigh 27609
Fax: [phone]
Phone:[phone]
(Retain a copy of this farm for your records)
Revised 05-2015

(Type of Visit: Q5 Compliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance j
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access +1
Date of Visit: � Arrival Time: I 1 Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: CiPAgI Cjop-( Rise&(h jig Owner Email:
a
Owner Name: )VC S' /1�1yas, y Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
[� �s l / RBi�IYJL Hq(`
Facility Contact: �i Q'i71 Oil Title: $ v
Onsite Representative: du
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Tratjj Laz'46-
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number;
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
111
Design C►urrent
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Layer
]Non -Layer
Design
Capacity
Cnrrent
Pop.
Cattle
Dairy Cow
Design
Capacity
C*urrent
Pop.
Dairy Calf
eeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
D , P.ouitr..
Layers
Design
Ca aci
C►►urrent
P.o
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Turke s
ey Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
Ot
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes &' No ❑ NA [W] NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'E� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [:]Yes 56 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Eacili Number: 51 - JV = I Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier;
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): &
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
CT No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
D NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
- ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
�g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
® Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[E No
❑ NA
D NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Q NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412014 Continued

Facility Number: E7L I - -71
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes CR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
10 NE
❑ Yes JR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes T@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 5� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1�] No ❑,NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
[�5No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
5TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer.to question ##):;Explain;any YES answers and/or -any additionalgrecommendations or any other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional` pages as'neces'sary). `
(!)I c for&n -ivr/, 414 d vll )(yett o
S���9�s�<�r I 1 1rs S/ fie=a,7-C4. `fie_Qonvaif
% t � t I�� �
�a[(br�a 07 �t ra1r� Jjt, �v-�
I , Dut.4o chi e a ' n,el e WT07 st-a�� f 4N ar a f rVOT 04
s owft' Gi c `9 P1 �v8�� ul ex d v�o l o►/
VVIO
�f a j ��rn 1lves` f Sal --t-�a SOX? 101DM3-, 4,re c fe-
YV0k AA ly PJ
15Ia440 YV00 ��� c eyood__
31 f 1/0 Yva"', Ij
1115-1 f s YV003107 D' 37
`711;1( YV00 -67g Or L�a
4 11a f r-5 woo(a13 q p.so
7pleluew�' Ia oQ?05(d- �lkt rvh6hcA& '
4 ;9
Ill 0h9 �'s v r-ta da.�
Reviewerllnspector Name:
w",
CJ�&,e Sidte_h e 1alAl)� .
0-6& J�!`hhlplfl' Phone: I11-7 LNa3 V
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: a010
2/4/20I4

i ype or visit: Qq, t~ompnance inspection v uperanon tceview u Niructure Evaivation v t ecnmcai Assistance
Reason for Visit: 10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Ujn1Ce
Date of Visit: S Arrival Time: ; NQ Departure Time: 0 County: U-0hr Region: PKg)T
Farm Name: LQl1 {��i, Cops RP�_eii&b Owner Email:
Owner Name: IVC sf'_ U� j liPy 1'1�{� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: a �3 U$ 1;2'[M
Facility Contact: }elm( Te ropl) iy !Q Title: BrM H#,4 gPl Phone:
Onsite Representative: iAhn T /t4N Integrator: — rd,
Certified Operator: Ai ma Tei�,n Certification Number: R9g7S—o
Back-up Operator: Certification Number: q97 DZ
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current t Design C>urrent Design C►►urrent
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pap. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
on -Layer
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dv P.oult , Ca aei P,o Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets
rl Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other Turke Poults
Other I
�x
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:)No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

U
Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Y
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [:]Yes No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑rr No ❑ NA NE O
Other Issues LAff�
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the [] Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? []Yes ® No ❑ NA [] NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ®' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes Rr No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any'YESanswers and/or any additional'recow6Fnendations or any other.comments.
Use drawings of facility to better, explain situations. (use, additionat, pages as necessary).'.
ab, An- r1�.r q hrs car ]A uin a. berme t � I l I S, Ct�s do of -h./S . P0_V' bre
�'lr1' � v� F Pn a�� �
On �} Ima-- � sh e � c�� Pd_ �!
Slw. p_", cte4w4 OLI`u�-S1Igboly by vi ich Pei W/ �'iQ d 1-5of�I(ef Sled w�
,! I W �'° 0,2] Ib Cj � 02oh�re��tNwP1
s�+ �t10 � liPd. o�lf e .� i3 f � � ,�C�� J
OIV��Q�I �"s Pr. iRus• 1"- L7v� r P s SalYP dole 71a�y� 3 srf �s� VOG
s�' vrvQ� gal t, loot,
%
tJ �� se � ,lev
1 �e'a
YYDO � �3 Z q 11aJ is 0rsp LOW AVulah on aii a law-rVa� �&V'd&e f�TR,
N60 qWy aJ11115- 0,3s sof l �1SL011 ,k7s116iliy d1l�e �� �y-e' .
W003310 washy 016 - %
�
�v�o a lob/)(y 0/P.r 60010bol pQf ff�k- regV 4- �y� `je,
31a0,r60
qHP 0,3A
li �-,Thisr,nuwar
v-c�YapJA
iM yftm( 7, Me_'
C�OV S lk'�i6 01 tom,% OL '04 ct le
�Tyr�bfr'{o��
e01 a5-Cvaheaa'y1uwP�' teSfLd�yet a� � huJ��o��, vlI'rdla� c�if4oiyn, Alma- dill mailcp 1 hml-fvpsleakooirs oc�
vi0C�Q'
Reviewer/Inspector Name
ba Sc�17P1 el- Phone: !fq 7gl'Tj3 tf
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
jOan,scaneI 1&ncdenT, jov
Date: t�� 3alo1S
21412014

Facili Number: - Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: �/� S'�{
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): flolvAIL6, h :�Mj I L�
Observed Freeboard (in): T
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
Structure 5
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes [yNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [3 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? EF Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ® Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
SPAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
/��❑
12. Crop Type(s): —�1Ih CQ �111 sIn l�qL�
13. Soil Type(s): pd A IS 'VA 14
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
2g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [5� No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis [] Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

0-�` D WS 51a a I tL( JVs
IType of Visit: UCompliance Inspection V Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: iSrRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: �County: Region: K) Pic
Farm Name: C�P��f>7� CI`Obc K �e(Yt s`�Zr�1�10�
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address: LPG 3 US -716 Bu t h/ C"
Facility Contact: Alm./ Title: Phone: 9Oy-(al0­[74?
Onsite Representative: A) ry)a- ` $^0 ha ('jaf)), 181 i2a Integrator: V dr r Oy1
Certified Operator: -AlCertification Number: a9 9`7so
Back-up Operator: c
p p _ ��(�}� C. �rrssl / Certification Number: gg-7a62
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design
C*apacity
inish
C►urrent Design Current Design
Pop, Wek Poultry Capacity Pop. Capacity
La er ow
Current
Pop.
eeder
7F..
Non -La er
alfFinish
11
eifer
Wean
Feeder
Design C►urrent
D�. P,oultr Ca acit P,o
gNn
Farrow to Finish
Layers
cker
der
Gilts
Non -Layers
Boars
Pullets
od Cow
keys
Other Turke Poults
Other her
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[:]Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

lFacHity Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: pt'/Yj6ra Seemy
—�
Spillway?: I
Designed Freeboard (in):
a 1/
Observed Freeboard (in): —7Q + 3 L}
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
[:]Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-5 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[S No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. N Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN ❑ PAN > l0% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
��11
12. Crop Type(s): (24tA COAS+A 1 Nft uA . i'h lam_ srn� 114«14
13. Soil Type(s): s Vor i\na LS
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[.�j[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
C*J
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑ Design []Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis [] Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes R No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ N
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
o ®NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 571911=
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes (0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [:]Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [3�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Callo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a, follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments..
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Yvo3+e- Qfi war redme- aid Q Cp W� d (/7 d v111'j r n,s &-Vol
Q porch (tom' � ./
I , A m is�a �t� w a r read e by the � ar�F� m�y�, Yrh o ✓) ek 49- 5 0" o ��a�u� � ( �
sah1 1� Twof � � It ou#a f f1lPk -i: -el cvtA was ov-r b 1� $ tB9,v®�
7
Wks o +^a 1 s 1.89N/Ac, 0�77 tin
� so, off. Fi�e(d 7 �'�' � �.���d+o !o �1, c-ha, PcaI
1f�s-oath Ynoia Cortat°d-"AP— �'ec�ds, 113 3s �rec whl�e
�(olaz ai
a 1 Naa say► aT ! � � � yv� oo�o 1
l�v(�0301 �,qq 3 (JVS
vvoco Ite a s ° ' , f'Wl s o�dar 1 a Old �e is a 1 �
Yv0o5�3� a la$! 13 0 a I � 012
�p;�Sa,r,�l� sGDIy0y9 ij�l1'rl3
� ,Caleb , Edv)��I`syk04 r, Melds H)D11 e�3�4 )3P
sr d bei p j -now , J
[a)-r svf,e wo loia1113 . "�E IS' '� �� ; 'Vi back-
% COm i� Q"fT (Q 1 1 06 Rf',�.c�1�1 Pso/1
Cq yYg2 QiYe� ��� �}l s°o�t�eQ. `®r � �- � � {7' � � (;6�d., s �� � ►�a� � jm )'� +1?
-��e� )s �') ��le-le, s e- � � a�a, Ch � crF r�1c 4ba�k�.p
s liasb4rod
-} fro Ji��4crs, l 'v lc i an doily l +e c 6o� %a�d8 ��
`Cpir�flafol eve hO� F/o Kv corm d6 . �2 �2�n rr $��rm- 4Ia z '7q1 = yataa -spit
Reviewer/Inspector Name: „ .A,r,-.P,(�,r _ AYv 1 P C etine Phone: qI 7- 72 j_ 9oj3 y-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: 1 1
/4/2011

Type of Visit: PTompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: gRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: — rrival Time: Departure Time: County: �5}0+JRegion662__'�
Farm Name: e+n Ci'� (�Q 175 Owner Email:
Owner Name: - L° _ Phone: �5 r? (p
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ,(���( C fi�il DD f e—
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wet Poultry
Layer
Design
Capacity
C►urrent
Pop. Cattle
_1 Dairy Cow
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder I
INon-Layer
EDairyCalf
DairyHeifer
Current D Cow
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Design
Ca aci
P,o ,
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
-La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
TDP,,oultr,
ets
Beef Brood Cow
Qthe.r
Other
ke s
ke Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 2fNo
❑ Yes �(No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ONE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: S I jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No [] NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ;E(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes I/ I No DNA ONE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
i'—'
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? 777777"'''"'''
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes L� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ;'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes PTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
D NA
❑ NE
Required_ Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[Z"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [;eNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfal I ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

W
Facili Number: $ 1I Date of Inspection;
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of coy�liance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)`belol.laO I I 54A_-C� 0A,&U4'9-J
#1 0' ` f , I p - t, , S tt a. t-o-t ✓v.��
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [] Yes 21' No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [—]Yes PNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes PfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes No
[:]Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments ]
Use drawings of facility to..better explain situations (use additional pages as.necessary).
1'J.-14-1a 04 ( 5 W Oi3 391-1)
9-as-0,20
2-216-13 009t LLD00 fo
50 i 1 A4 Zr1�tS L 0 1 3 b 0 {° Jx., a -jt�'Ko_'o 1 +o n r e C-Orn r", e-
io - a g" 1 G no�Li 1 3
d D U9'tie 4
�
a"L d ray 40 5 rl ! ki 71
p I Ig ea (� b rc� , dr� traces �`e r � ,�� a 6 a Ckt-- - !
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Phone:
Date: 3 —I.3
21412011
Page 3 of 3
�c�n , bQv ma-r c e- ned e n r

f ype of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
teason for Visit: 9f Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County.-112h �4m-,Cgion:&ZCLfL
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: PbDe
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: 11 V -I O (0
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer
Design Current
C►attle Capacity Pop.
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCaif
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dr. P■oultr, C•_a aci P■a ,
DairyHeifer
D Caw
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Puliets
Beef Brood Cow
ke s
ke Poults
er tOuther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
[] Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
PeNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

f
tacility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes ❑ No
21'NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier:
Spillway'?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Freeboard
Observed (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes �TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes ;20&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any ofthe structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes 2,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
T
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes O'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ;2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application'? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
D Yes L3No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination'?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ;21%io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 040 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [] Yes XNo ❑ NA ONE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'? ❑ Yes <0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 { 21412011 Continued

Facilit Number: Date of ins ection:
24. Did the
Qfaccili©+aiill to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is tLhe }'aciGty out of compliance with permit conditions elated to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. (3-02 f
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes jlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes P1010 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �.ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes .ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes .fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any.YES answers and/or any additional recommendations ors any other cninments :
Use drawings of facility to better ex lain;si'tuatioris .use additional° a es as nee essa`�
I.1-ao-1l oa-
12-
3
(fin M&rlk
t P°
can
L'U 4""o r -4A [/tb n— d-L. 1 Ira,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
1
Phone: r)
Date:�-
214/2011

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: QJ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: Countyz6hMfori
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: � ism e s Th De
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region: (R?, o
Certification Number: I O 7 66P
Certification Number:
Longitude:
tv
Desigu Current Design. Current Design Current
1P.OrfuutlE.
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Capacity Pvp. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er DairyCow
F:�
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dt, P,oultt, Ca aci
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Turkeys
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ;!j"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 0
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?W(No
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: -r7 Date of Inspection:,__)
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONo
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes Vf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ONO ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ;dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? r
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
l I. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes f]�I [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu; Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
I& Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes 211No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes )Zlio ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes r— ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[-]Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes 0No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard [:]Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 .21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the fa ility fail to calibrate waste application a ui m
25. s ent as required by the permit? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
11 JI �i ity outomp is t of a wi h p it conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. % 0,p o p o L-'z 0o 9S
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? lon d -�/ II
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑Yes �No [] NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes V(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) TT
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer'to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other,comments <,-4 '
Use drawings of facility to better.;ex lain situations (use additional pages
,asmecessar
[�' '
W oa tea. 4 y� oll r cV 09 q q g / C� it ° oil t 13g$%
/*7l,0 to y(rs s` o (s " A
'4/1G 4000V 9 e 35
Y/g�id 6009319, 0,'75
1a'lt�f to0IV-.1cI Qr3]
jUSAae NAnm-le- a'a h4w L/Wrl
vaAA�b
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Phone: — G
Date:
214,12011

� Uivisian of Water Quality
Facility Number Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit Aecompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
oe
Reason for Visit QrRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other /❑ Denied Access
er
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: �--✓%Regio
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Phone No:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ o ❑ g [=dl Longitude:
I T.
Design Current
NIPultry
Design
Current
Design
C*urgent
Swine
Capacity Population
Capacity
Population
Cattle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
Layer
El Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer I
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
ElFarrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Dry Poultry
Weir
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
El Pullets
❑ Turkeys
El Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
El Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Other
❑ Other
giurkey Poults
❑Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes O/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ NA
El NE
�eoYes
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility Number:d ESEVI Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): hAw
L111-1
Observed Freeboard (in): =3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of an of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
.0/No
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement`?
❑ Yes
jdtNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
41, o
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
9,o
NEl NA ❑ NE
Id -No El NA El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
Y o
ElNA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ElYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
omments refer to yestton:# Er lain an YE_S; a "` ;=n t C �( q ) p y answers and/or any recommendations ors any other comments
,.� §a_X 5 a.si=.f @ IF 'S s m-
L1se drawings4of.facility to be'tte�=ezplatn sitivations (use.addrttonal pages,,aslnecessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: / Uv
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date:
F
I

a
Facility Number -0 4�"
Date of Inspection
-Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
JVNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
UNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Ls No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
EYNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
ElNA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments an Drawings: 4a'
MCA& Ctm�." — - - I e f V-1)9 q = . 317 8-109-07--
•
S-H-09 P10 ---
, ,����� (� �S417d 6
0 Ark l) 1 4 ..rrftq\ rna4l I
w
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit Co pliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
1
I A 447
Date of Visit: �rrival Time: Departure Time: II I_L County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0 = i = N Longitude: 0 ° = d = i,
Design C*urrent
Design Current
Design
Current
Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacky
Population
Finish
La er
❑ Dai Cow
Feeder
ro
❑Non -La er
❑ Dai Calf
Finish
ry Poultry
❑ Dai Heifer
❑ D Cow
o Wean
o Feeder
❑ Layers
ElNon-La ersPullets
❑ Non-Dairyo
❑ Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Finish
Gilts
Boars
ElTurke s
ElBeef Brood Cow
JEO
Turke Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Other
Discharges & Stream [_mpacts
l . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes )? No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes jpzNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

+ cumber: — Date of Inspection 9
.-f ollection & Treatment
4 fl torage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): t L-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZFNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ic/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ,"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental) threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ;2&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes /ZJ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes J:'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[:] Yes
.O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
❑ Yes
NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0Ia
_2J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? Cl Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ZFNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
Zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
W-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes C?fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
;;3"'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
,��,//
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes
L/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additi"oaal=Corrimentsand/o"r'Drawings� ,5 )' ?'`a*" x
S
#' 4 �` Wv f
C
// ��yy '] �] j
L�!'t�OQ
q��
Qs p
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510074 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510074 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: CgMpliance inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine I County: Johnston Region: Raleiah
Date of Visit: 06/11/2008 Entry Time:10900 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Central Crops Research Station Owner Email:
Owner: NC State University
Mailing Address: Box 7201 3501 Lake Wheeler Rd Raleigh NC 27695
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Multiple Intearators
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35`¢Q'15" Longitude: °
Hwy 70 at Wake/Johnston Cty Line
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: James G Pope Operator Certification Number: 18486
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name James Pope Phone:
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Sludge Survey 8/3/07 0=5.1
Use calibrated GPM on crops in ground at this time and in the future.
1/2 turn sprinkler +determine IPH rating on nozzles and match other full turn to IPH= Calibrate full fine of fixed heads (field)
Mr. Pope left message stating that the 1/2 turn sprinklers were adjusted to 1/2 flow.
Primary lagoon needs to be seeded now with a warm weather grass- Continue to improve.
f
Secondary lagoon remove briars, holes filled in, much better shape than last year.
Both lagoons need to improve "grass/vegetation" on embankments as weather improves.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510074 Owner - Facility: NC State University
Inspection Date: 06/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 510074
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 334 363
Total Design Capacity: 334
Total SSLW: 45,090
Waste Structures
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY
agoon SECONDARY 72.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510074 Owner - Facility: NC State University Facility Number, 510074
Inspection Date: 06/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
NO NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
00013
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
Cl
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ Cl .
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ Cl
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ 110
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic. Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS510074 Owner - Facility: NC State University
Inspection Date: 06/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 510074
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents .
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS510074 Owner - Facility: NC State University Facility Number: 510074
Inspection Date: 06/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fall to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 5

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency ^0—�Other El Denied Access
Date of Visit: ' Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: - 0 K:y�� Region
Farm Name: J
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
3,y "ce,P a cre�. 10 a 9
Back-up perator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 0 0 0 t =11 Longitude: ❑ o = 4 = f4
Design
Current, Design Current
Design Current
Sir n� Capes ity
Popul tio�; et Poultry - C►'n city Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
La er ❑ Dairy Cow
❑Non -La er ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
3
Dry Poultry
Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ La ers
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Non -Layers
❑ Gilts
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
El Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes /No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes IL6 N
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VNo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): I-OL
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑�i�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) //
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o El NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes (((PNo ❑ NA [:IN E
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? TTTT
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 11J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? VNo
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
91N' o
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
El NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
AMNO
AUTAMAMPA0,0571'i
f
Reviewer/inspector Name
{ Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Page 2 of 3
Date:
12128104 Continued

FARM 51-74 WHO Central Crops
5/24/2008
W06389 3/25/2008 0.96
1 /25/2008
4/29/2008
W05795 2/29/2008 1.4
12131 /2007
12/30/2007
11/26/2007
11 /25/2007
W02171 ' 9/26/2007 0.1
7/28/2007
7/21 /2007
W09275 5/22/2007 0.37
3/23/2007
3/26/2007
W05626 1/25/2007 0.33
11 /26/2006

Central Crops Research Station
Subject: Central Crops Research Station !
From: "Humphrey, Edward - Smithfield, NC"<[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:33:39 -0600
To: "Jane Bernard" <[e-mail]>
Jane, I met with James Pope this morning. The following will update you on what we discussed.
To: James Pope
Central Crops Research Station
Clayton, NC 27542
From: Eddie Humphrey
Johnston County SWCD
Re: Erosion Control Around Lagoon
Date: Nov. 20, 2007
This memo is to follow up my visit of this morning. As we discussed you should slope the eroded
banks back slightly and seed them with a mixture of tall fescue and annual ryegrass. Mulch the
seeded area and cover with erosion control netting. Mow the area to a height no less than 4-5 inches
as needed. Refrain from the use of Glyphosate herbicides around the lagoon. Continue with your
efforts to trap the burrowing animals and fill the burrows once they are inactive.
If I can be of any further assistance let me know.
Edward Humphrey
Johnston SWCD
1 of 1 11/29/2007 7:54 AM

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box, ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists El Other
❑ Design El Maps
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual
Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22,
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.. Did the facility fail to c librate wasteapplicatione�tpmennt as required by t e permit?
it
fa l Yes
❑ No
❑
❑ NA
❑
❑ NE
❑
S
Did the facility fa condducta sludge survey as requi�d b�the�perm c�C-1�1�/J
Yes
No
NA
NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3I.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional"Comments and/, .' } a a {f ddaa� x� i r j 'a y k 4 ryng F
4ttk�1 ► `-r J w� C1�
it 10' 0-,)b
LIUW
q -'r � f)
�
o� y�gm
Page 3 of 3 0 12128104

Y3
ivision of Water Quality
FAcility Number 5 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 4toutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 C711 7167 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: 0, en+ta C tQ P1 S'4' 104wner Email:
n � A
Owner Name: f vC- .�]4e—k e Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Regio
Onsite Representative: Integrator: i
Certified Operator.%� Operator Certification Number: �) �cU "7 M
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ c = 6 Longitude: ❑ o 0 `
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
_ ❑ La er
ji JEJ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
FE1
Turke Poults
Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made`?
Design Current
Cattle : Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dty Cow
❑
Non -Dal
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:EJ
i
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes F� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes R�(,_,No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes L'J o ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

ff/ ZI�9
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 13
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 01 ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? )XYes Oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o El NA El NE
El Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [I Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) rr////
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
iNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
LReviewer/Inspector Name Phone: i y/
Re viewer/Inspector Signature: Date: q
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:-,Iq Date of inspection
a -
Repuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? El Yes [I No El NA El NE
CuG 10-0yt IU-©9
20. Does the facility fail to have all componentf the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the approprrate. box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Application eekly Freeboard aste Analysis it Analysis ❑Waste Transfers
W16-1 Certification
�ainfall El Stocking Crop Yield El120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections El Weather
Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28,
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
_0 ►v zrv�'�� ern n TV
--.�- � "ir e � 0 O 461
�Rp� vC�L �-���� ��� tit t���5'�
19[0010 � wa 50ioa n) k,9
12128104

I
❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: §10074 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510074 t_I Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations -Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit. 06/27/2006 Entry Time:08:50 AM Exit Time: 10:20 AM
Farm Name: Central Croos Research StatiorL
Owner: NC State University
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: Box 7201 3501 Lake Wheeler Rd Raleigh NC 27695
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35*40'15" Longitude: 78°30'40"
Hwy 70 at Wake/Johnston Cty Line
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents © Other Issues
Certified Operator: James G Pope Operator Certification Number: 18486
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name James Pope Phone:
Primary Inspector: John N Hunt Phone: [phone]
Ext.238
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soils report #10881; C.Bermuda field relatively high P, Zn and Cu, but within allowable application parameters.
Calibration performed on part of system 1/20/2006, to complete irrigation calibration and sludge survey by Oct. 1, 2006.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510074 Owner -Facility: NC State University Facility Number : 510074
Inspection Date: 06/27/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19.00
agoon SECONDARY 66.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510074 Owner - Facility: NC State University Facility Number : 610074
Inspection Bate: 06/27/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review . Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
.__.......... ......................_..............._..,...,..,.._.,..,..
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS510074 Owner - Facility: NC State University
Inspection Date; 06/27/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number; 510074
Reason for VisIt: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 tbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
- Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Varina
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS510074 Owner - Facility: NC State University
Facility Number: 510074
Inspection Date: 06/27/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS510074 Owner - Facility: NC State University
Inspection Date: 06/27/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Otherissues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 510074
Reason for Visit. Routine
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Type of Visit NODCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit(( Routine 0 Complaint 0 Fallow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 N Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ✓1 Region:O
Farm Name: 'T 0_t "' '� t�� YG� �a` Owner Email:
1 + r
Owner Name: �� t Phone: \ i
Mailing Address: "Zd 35 I ��Q' 1�FP_CT-Q_y Y2d �'QAW= OC- `Z� (or
U
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: j Phone No:
L
Onsite Representative: A� Integrator: �'V a r-��w
Certified Operator: 3 u p� Operator Certification Number: p
4
'�
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: e Longitude: = ° 0
COAJL
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity
Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
ILI Non -Layer
1
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
El Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑Non -La Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other
N umber of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made`?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

I acility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
fpNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
truc�ture 1 Syucture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): t1
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
1�kNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
% No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
[:1 NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
a]
Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes r 0
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
El PAN El PAN > 10% or 10 lbs El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
❑NA El NE
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Ir No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
IT No
ElNA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
No
11
ElNA
ElNE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft. Explain "any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary),
4$ s
W4 c6yrat It301,9L
N0L'&2- �i y1a��� �1� , vi ) ; O • I ! / rj L I I G 6 , o ' o 1 , I / I jo 0 . _2--�
Reviewer/Inspector Name I `j_t>J h Cn. t Phone: +`� -(�' I Y'ZS I
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: ' Z-`�
ruge 4 of j 1!./Lo/V4 [,unu►eueu

A
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection o
-�
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists f ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes J�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
V NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
l
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
#FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: .
AL
I
rrR�•� J► � o�.�r� 1 1 � �
v
Y � � i� 1 1��2'
R,e,!` ems► r e d �`' a O��`� C� o� re -Ca v- As c r �L 1_
S
�,�► ter- R Rn
C ,
Page 3 of 3
12128104

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 510074 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510074 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qgmoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 12/20/2006 Entry Time:12:55 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Faun Name: Qgntral Croas Research Station Owner Email:
Owner: NG State University
Mailing Address: Box 7201 3501 Lake Wheeler Rd Raleigh NC 27695
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Hwy 70 at Wake/Johnston Cty Line
Phone: [phone]
Latitude:35'40'15" Longitude:78°30'40"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: James G Pope Operator Certification dumber: 18486
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative James Pope Phone:
24 hour contact name James Pope Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510074 Owner - Facility: NC State University
Facility Number : 510074
Inspection Date: 12/2012006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Crop yield, monthly stocking & mortality records kept
COC & Permit on site
WUP dated 1/30/06
Waste analysis:
917/06 = 0.11
519/06 = 0.09
119/06 = 0.20
Soil samples taken last week, and sent to Lab
Sludge survey report dated 8-9-06, Please mail copy to our office in Raleigh.
Irrigation calibration completed (Solid set system)
Small sprinklers @ 12.9GPM on 6/23/06
One Big Gun @ 94GPM on 1/20/06
Reviewed waste application records on IRR1 & IRR2 - Complete and balanced
" Lagoon levels & rainfall recorded with initials for structural check
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510074 Owner - Facility: NC State University
Inspection Date: 1212012006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 510074
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 334 148
Total Design Capacity: 334
Total SSLW: 45.090
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 2Z00
agoon SECONDARY 60.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS510074 Owner -Facility: NC State University Facility Number: 510074
Inspection Date: 12/20/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8, Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS510074 Owner - Facility: NC State University
Facility Number: 510074
Inspection Date: 1212012006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Corn, Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crap Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soii Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Varina
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS510074
Inspection Date: 12l20/2006
Records and documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
Owner - Facility: NC State University .
Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 510074
Reason for Visit: Routine
❑
■
❑ ❑
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1, inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately,
Page: 6

. I y
Permit: AWS510074 Owner - Facility: NC State University
Inspectlon Date: 12/20/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 510074
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 7

s a
Division of Water Quality
N
JE�:Fa:iity Number�� 0 Division of Sail and Water Conservation
Qther Agency 0
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit /" Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: = 3 O Departure Time: County: J o9 •.JSrJ"/ Region:
Farm Name: _ _Cd:T A: ice, C-F,., es. Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:. C _6
Certified Operator:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: i t3 4 ec
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = = Longitude: = ° = A = If
f
Design Current � �" ,, � "Destgn , Current
l
gn Current
I
Swore FopWation ,. Wet Poultry Capacity Population C►attle
apacity Population
.Capacity
❑
Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑Dai Cow
❑
Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La et
J.
❑ Dairy Calf
❑
Feeder to Finish
3
?.�
" ` ❑Dai Heifer
Dry Poult y El Dry Cow
El
Farrow to Wean
El
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocket
❑Non -La ers
El Pullets ❑Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
❑
Boars
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑Other Numbe,?opt ructures:
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ii ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge'?
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: 51 — 7`�f Date of Inspection Ei a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
ElNA
ElNE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
7 .
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes tZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 1bs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C / tns S S t-, Q ER_M_ _ t- A` / -S Cr
_
13. Soil type(s) Cr wl o VI-iy'n cL
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes pNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination`❑
Yes ,fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ZbNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a ; cs►. `((_ T Z 5 z)
Reviewer/Inspector Name ` °� ,�{, ' E,�", Phone: l Z a
Reviewer/inspector Signature: ram, Date: z I-
12128104 Continued

� � h
Facility Number: S _ 7,I Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage &%%PP�/eerrmit readily available? El Yes �No [I NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the AA:?readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check tbVpropria t V below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Appl' lion El Weekly Fydeboard ❑ Wasnaly is ❑ Soil Anislysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ StVking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes 2fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑
❑ NA
❑ NE
32.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Yes /EfNo
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency`?
❑ Yes ,Z'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104

i.
Type of Visit R Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ) 2� Time: 1 ��-
Facility Number r �I '�
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ....I.fL. ..J.............. .... 5� ...................................... County: ........FJ-4..g.^+' a,. ................................
OwnerName:.................................................,......................................................................... Phone No:...... �.s...3......2G. 14.............................I......
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative:.........1..,�?►.Mz S F6P_ Integrator: tj
...............................................................................I.................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ' " Longitude • ' "
Discbaraes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑*o
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ❑�i�o
❑ Yes E2 &o
❑ Yes .,ZNo
❑ Yes,111No
❑ Yes No
Structur8 b
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Fatality Number: ,5 — Date of Inspection z
Required Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes PNo
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan read' available?
��"Y
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes P'No
23.
Does record need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ONO
king
❑ Waste A cation ❑ Free�ard ❑ Wa& Analysis ❑ �ampling A.r 03
24.
N y �•�- �/s s-3F
Is facility not in compliance with any applI de setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes _[ �,No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
'-�_-Wo
❑ Yes ONO
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes 2No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes j2r&o
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes .�No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
'Pilo
❑ Yes ❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes ❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Facility Number: S l ^ i H Date of Inspection 2 *'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN, ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copperd/or Zinc
I7,1
12. Crop type t` , i % SK C_ � a4Z. rh v 0 b,. S • G
13. Do the receiving crops difAr with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste anagement Plan (CAWMP)?
�� c
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? tf
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes R No
[:]Yes .0 No
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes PfNo
❑ Yes '2 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ;3rNo
❑ Yes WNO
❑ Yes ❑'No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ;'No
❑ Yes e No

, \`3
Type of Visit 91compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other El Denied Access
Date of Visit: % d Time:
EFacility Number %
Not O erational OBelowThreshold
Permitted iff Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or :
`�hAbove Threshold
Farm Name: A G -so 1ESC.i?Ca EMW County: ao► M4
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: J4MEe��t3 Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑Horse Latitude ' 4 �6 Longitude 0 �� �°°
�'YNNYi
Destgu
Current
-`.
;;
Design .'
Current, t
.n4 �
Design Current
Swine
Caw!
P,o ulation
Poultr
irpaci .
Po ulation ;!a le
40ulation
❑
Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
aiEj
❑
Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non-Dai
❑
Farrow to Wean
_0
El
Farrow to Feeder
or
❑Other
❑
Farrow to Finish
Total Design C�pdCllty
El
Gilts
� I �
❑
Boars
ii Total SSI,W..
Number of Lagoons
❑Subsurface
Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
I
Holding Pondsl/ Solid Traps ❑ No Li wd Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other .�,//
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Id No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Ia No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ff No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �; No
Wad Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ZN
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Stnteture 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identirter: o IJ
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 4.Continued

Facility Number: St — ? Date of Inspection ! ? o
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
fZF 1Jz ilz 7--a 5a
12. Crop type C.tt a- ./U_� / S ,$ C'e'ami0pr $ .�
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes 5No
❑ Yes L�qNo
❑ Yes -f2 No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes 53 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes *0
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes C I No
Reouired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or oa�th r Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Cerf�fied�An3 al Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) lja.r 1.4 ❑ Yes XNo
0 0• 3r
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irri ion, fr/ard, teanalysts & soil sample reports) Cjc412A- CKOIS' ❑ Yes No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? GIA ( GI 19 ❑ Yes No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 7t ❑ Yes [Zo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes �?No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes XNo
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes RrNO
[--]Yes JZNo
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments {refer to``quesdo #) �ExplainIny YES_'ansvvers and/or any recommendations or any utlter co"mnnents�
..: . . A
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional, pages,as(necessary) ..
Field Copv ❑ Final Notes
-A'r 9
god �� i �i.✓fT '%�Cs ., -z, WOT- N
V
Reviewer/Inspector Name �— r',,TLLq7 0Z T,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 0 3 a
05103101 1 Continued

Facility Number: 5 / — Date of Inspection / o
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes W(No
❑ Yes [�No
❑Yes `f<o
❑ Yes 1 do
El Yes ld No
❑ Yes E�
05103101

�3 ! n a !
-'?,a. .:� �i
Type of Visit tom liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number jllateofvisit: ime:
,� Not O erationai Below Threshold
�,
Ild Yermitteddd,OCertified 0 Conditionally Certified [] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Thresholds-
Farm Name:
GWI_0 t C LQ r S County: —� �.3 S T%
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: �5 Integrator: 13 . 4 _
Certified Operator: e__S eu V�eOperator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 1 " Longitude 0
�Destgn ',Current_
L
! Design Current';. Design CucrentE
"Swore �Ca 'acih� Po 'ulat�on
Poult ['< Ca°"acitv,. Po ulatian .
'i� �Ga acity Pti� ulaton �Caitle' g
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer ❑ Da'ry
ElFeeder to Finish 3
❑ Non Layer:::::::d❑ Non Day
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeders
❑Other 4
❑ Farrow to Finish
i:i�,..
DesignECapaclty 1
❑ Gilts
i,jSTotal
� 3 i 3 i
�. i
❑ Boars
��, �, Total' SSLW 1
�° r
i' Subsurface Drains Present ❑ S ray Freld Area i
:E Number of Lagoons ; i.', �� 3,�' a ❑ ❑ La aon Area
3 ,�
i,t
I ;eI oidjiii!m Ponds ,'SolldE'I'ra s i',''�
g p
€
3' No Li uid W '' €t l3 !3 `
i❑ ante Mana ement S stem l
_.
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
,4:' is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: '
qqFreeboard (inches),
F . AI03/01
❑ Yes ;3"No
❑ Yes 0"No
❑ Yes 2(No
❑ Yes
01 No
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ Yes
ZNo
El Yes
No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number % — Date of Inspection a
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
ZNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
El Yes
PNo
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
VZNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑' .
r
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑'No
Waste Application
/ ,
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
F41 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
e'
No
12. Crop type r svi Cr
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
PfNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
INO
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ONO
Re fired RRcords & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
2 No
o t��� 18. Does the facility fail to have all components h Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ ATUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) Z4 o. z
El Yes
ONO
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ i ation, freeboard, wdstd analysis& soil sample4rports)
❑ Yes
[R<o
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
XONO
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
ElYes
N0
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
PNo
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
XNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
0<0
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. 7771
Comments (refer,to question#} Ezpluin any YES n`swe"is�`andlr s y recommends sfoclany other,coigments e .
,Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (usewseiadditionat pages as.necessary,): Field Copy ❑Final Notes
�� tp� t,+4�� l�.��;L`c Sz � ? i�- 8 :7 f� Scco•,roai� 7��,�� af�-S
� t
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: S f - -7y Date of Inspection /D y
011 6
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
05103101
/yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ; No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes 'o
❑ Yes .I?No

'- tf/73 f
Type of Visit A�r Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit a Routine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: a) Time: =
Q Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
GPermitted.B'Certifi4 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName: .......... r✓G 54 ............................................................. ........................... County:........,...�?.!`I,s ....................................
Owner Name:
FacilityContact: ........ ..... .... .............................................................. Title:
Mailing Address:
PhoneNo:.....................................................................................:.
PhoneNo: ...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: ....... :4M F- S rOe� Integrator: ........................................................ ...................................................................................... .......^.
Certified Operator................................................................................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Xa%wine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • t 66 Longitude • d 44
Design. Current' ° Design :Current
to Ca' aci " Po elation Poultry „° Ca acr , Po elation Cattle
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
3
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer
[]Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total 1Design Capacity ,F [
" . • -
,Total SSLW t
u�,u:• a.uri
s
Nuimb'eirof Lagooiss ' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
j
j.
Holding Ponds"/Solid Traps' ; ! ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges $: Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes PIo
❑ Yes ;'No
❑ Yes �To
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes JJNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..................................... t... om'.. y............ ....................... ............... .............. ....... .... I ....... I ........... ............
Freeboard (inches): �y "
5/00 Continued on back

Facility Number: Date of Inspection �1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
;dNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
VrNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an .
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
VNO
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
014o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
ZNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
j2 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
ZNo
12. Crop type C-o" LJ 14 ZAA T' S . Q £Ac.1 S, Z G L Alt-M.lD !1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No .
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
gNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
El Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
RING
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
PK0
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
/No
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ff No
Est! f iQ
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certifi Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) [I Yes ONo
0-69
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irOgation��, freeboard, Vay iTe ani2�4s & soil s�le reports) ❑ Yes ZNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes LR'go
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 01qo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes Z No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes Xf No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes �No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes CTNO
�'VQ •yi�lp�iggs :ojr• d�f c�e�cie$ •r'v�re ��ted• �11x`i>�g this:v�s�t! • Yoil>f will •�ee�iytz �o ilu>�•th�r • . .
irtiries aridente: abauti this visit:
^....1...�• ... r: w:.rl...�� 1 , r -:t .'.. .. +!..� -:•�.. e r ....R':,...- .•� :• .:.:r.. :. .. - :r:re.:n .. •: .. 1. ..µ 4�.i..ln, 1 Ii..:Il 1]' I1..
C
gunwPEn SaM>` na -rMlhl l iC.�`t.: a_b 3 ,tom Ca2.�. ` r:►4K 6 . v j -sl o c. A6
�r MA Rc_µ —•► u�►��. AJo 1r &xPE c� Ti,'34L A -J C.' a• sIf►►1E� r- IMOPAC- r, let r
S�lu.Id.,�J i4 -`"o �J � �_ �- STY`r`c, tc- To �4PL� c.jai3 tr£ c•�rr`�"� � .
! aka?
Reviewer/Inspector Namef �� ' i 1 4 3:1�..,.:_' • i o, , .:�?M 3 s!.: N f r : ..11 /J..T 1,. .is:s.3,1 �F 1. i f�, ass;ds:.€
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - Date: q [ [S > g/pp

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below Oyes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes IL2'iVo
29. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes O"No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 2T'N'o
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, ctc.) ❑ Yes PrNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes Eff"No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes PTNo
lAqoqonaOrnntert an or= , rawtn r ;i-
Si-"'L' k�1 �a-•- gasz . a-aOz>
ILr--3 Oc
% N
o� i. AG a J Y•l S y s't-CM
5100
A

WRoutine C Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-uE of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 7 Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ...............C1 TQCR.i...S.................................................................. County:...........a..........................................
OwnerName: .........6f.S...... �t .......Ta i !.1 3.:<}'................... ........ Phone No:........................... ........ ..... ...................................................................
Facility Contact:..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:
...................................................
MailingAddress:......................................................................................... ...........I.............................................................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative:..... rt �5.....°.............................................................. Integrator:............^1:A .;........................................................
Certified Operator:..................................:...............................................................I............. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
a
.............................. ... ....:...... .............
Latitude 35 0 9 ©" Longitude '7e • ` ®"
❑ Layer
!
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. II' discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (II' yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): Q'S" r c ��
............................
......... ............. .... ......................................................................................................
O'jii . FL.;-1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑Yes
❑ Yes 01,410
❑ Yes PIKo
❑ Yes [2-4o
❑ Yes Q�io
❑ Yes pr�o
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 6
❑ Yes 0"No
Continued on back

Facility Number: S1 — 7 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑Yes gNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes PNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes VINO
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes XfNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes EfNo
12. Crop type G (I �Z_A T•
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes eNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ,fNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ,'No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there -a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
Required Records & Documents 5 3 :
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Genera c it readily available?
❑ Yes j2fio
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes 2-*o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irri�tion, freeboard, waste VAysis & soil same reports)
❑Yes To
20: Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ;�No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes )Z
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ,�No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes J:Wo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[]Yes E3-No
iQ yiQla�ignjs'o# dgfc�ertcies i��re �Qte� d�x`irig th s'vjsit' • Yoo Xi i- eegiye 06 #'utftr
corresDolldence.alsout.this Visit.'.'.'.'. .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. .'.'.'.'.'.
MA.`,1Tip}•'r% 2�GU,An- Ma�.!:.�IC.- f jV__ Td s,V
-5r
$ant£ Pf A C E^rI' M6Et jltp 10d(- DAo1,+6r_ U ;h/ C4A ecif_
Reviewer/Inspector Name F�f9 E� �� € a q-'i 1, 8 3 n { f i�� i fh r�r ! ' i�j'. j.�'��4/_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: , L v J. W e Date:

Facility Number: �r - Date of .Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below "'Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes gNo
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes PNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes P(No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes PI. to
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes 640
Ai
Z�- ) rt'o La,J6r4F- 9-E-904-EP t- ocv art` Q �S

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
56ivision of Water Quality
JGrRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection !t?
Facility Number—�- — ` t -`
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered O'c"ertified © Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:.......... ........... County:..............Q.11..................................
5- ..................... ��,
��++
OwnerName: ..... N.C- ..G �t............. ................................... ...................................... Phone No: ............. , ....� .�. .�...... 0�'.
Facility Contact: ...... V....(![ n.`er..as.......6,....��p"e—.. 'Title :................ .. ... ... Phone No: 55.3."-3,. i ..........
Mailing Address: .............1.3.2.2.S..........US.LO..t!Vle_? ............................... .....11 . t ln............lv..S,r...... ..I.SZ .....................
Onsite Rep resentative:....�,.. —z..mle-5......6PO ... Integrator:.......... �..............................................
Certified Operator me'_c ...-.6 ,.... [.. ..... Operator Certification Number; .............
...........................
Location of Farm:
C
C
Latitude =' ' " Longitude o• �` =11
Designer Current DeA Current 4Design Current
Swine Capacrfy ° Population ..Poultry; Capacity Population Cattle gCapactty'1'opulation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ",; ❑Dairy
eeder to Finish ❑Non -Layer ❑Non-Dairy
*k ❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder Other
i ❑ Farrow to Finish 'A
Total Design'capactty
❑ Gilts
r>: . a
❑ Boars
Total SSLW`''
bNutriber t►f Lagoons 1 Holding Portds " ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
« r
E� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System x
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUtnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes 2110
❑ Yes (moo
❑ Yes ❑'IClo
❑ Yes [Rlo
❑ Yes L No
❑ Yes [ 0
❑ Yes 111,IQo
❑ Yes [9"Ko
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes Q No

rr �►
R.
Facility Number: &5-
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
01�o
Structures L g_oons.Holding Ponds,F'lush_Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
,��
L1d'No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier:. .................................................................
...................................
Freeboard(ft):........................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
[9-&
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
UNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
Q!Ko
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
QX0
Waste Application
14, Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
M-Ko
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type °.l..C.✓tfa(!SS.....................Q`1..........1 ................
1na� .O.T .........
I......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
EWO
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
01ro
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? `
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.vialations orxleFicieRcies.were-itoted-iiuritig this,visit. You''w'ill receive�ito,ftirtlier-
:: corresportde 0 about tbis:visit::::..:..:.: - : :
❑ Yes B<0
❑ Yes E]Wo
❑ Yes UNo
❑ Yes 2To
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes Bfgo
❑ Yes Uo
❑ Yes ENo
Reviewer/Inspector Name.. , � }« ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 6 AA-PAA K tA,, 04,E Date, b , 7iZ t If IV

b ;�. f' t L r. P t -r3 : i r a� t' a;F 3 [ r r€ a3 6 4 a i;.at
l, I r� Divisiotiof Sol] and Water;Coiiber`'v'ationt-k peration , try �
© Division of Soil aiicl'Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
. ;Division of Water, Quality ,,Compliance Inspection
©.Other Agency Operation RcIJ
Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection Z
Time of lnspection 3 -a 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[] Permitted Certified [] Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not Operaational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ......... C R.PS....fZ�cF. 4 .S r! `� County:........ L..`.r............................................................
�1 �T°
Owner Name: Phone No:........................�.................
.
..................................................................................................................... ...... .......... ................
S�INC J.j ri
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:.................................................. ..... Phone No:...�SY� ....-..`r.E,-�......
Mailing Address: .....
Onsite Representative:...... .� �- Ke..................................................................
Certified Operator: ....�1�n`!..5..............:f0.f�....................................................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
..................................................................
............................................. :............................................. ......................................................... ......... ................... .........................
....:..
Latitude Longitude �• �� �«
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish J❑ Non -Layer IF-1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder JE3 Other
[]Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons Z ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area JEI Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream tmnacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge k observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. [I' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
6f
Frechoard (inches): ........... ...... ........
❑ Yes ZZNo
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes to No
❑ Yes 21 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes PrNo
❑ Yes Z No
Structure 6
1 /6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 51 -- 7 Date of Inspection 2't
5. Are there any immediate Areats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? [:]Yes XNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/irtiprovement'? ❑ Yes ZNO
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
9. Do any sluctures lack adequate, gauped markers with required top ol' dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation in,, ❑ Yes O"No
Iyaste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes „ZNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑ Yes ,j2rNo
12. Crop type .....Cry, ...t... .. r S� X IN CA ........ �� .C-'E^f r',4 G �S
..................................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ElYes &No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) [-]Yes ;eNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes j2l<o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ONo
Reg uired .Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'? ❑ Yes L'No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes WNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes 7No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes eN0
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 21-No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ;2rNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes J`No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes Wo
l�a.vialations.or. �#eficiendes.were noted. during. this•visit.. You va) .receive na further
resparidence:aboOtAhis visit........ .. . ... .
Use tohiinlelnts­(ir'feri,to
g etion #):`Explain any YES answers and/or any:recotYtmendafions orpany outer comments ;'° f
g'tif facilit y o better explain situations. (use'additiorial pages as necessary)i$+ E t,
5� ace Mv$' IC iLRr pl�.Ir,LS M : •J ArJ O qa 9t-, LL
1_Abu�.r i 5 p i{ Cti airti7 r3et' A. Y99,;:Oxff- d;-
rrK£f tl C> G6 t;J r.. 'r(4Lk,& o�Lp G,r.14tz�ot�
eCA,o.J<�O SL.%AbCr_ GAS AkdG- T4:ulS N-T- h1A(ZO "To Pv'A>° (,AC_,p-.,,i Si�C
Reviewer/Inspector Name ari 06:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �(L' _ 0-1 - 4 1 1-7- Date: II zyI cm _ 11/6/99

FACILITY NUMBER L - 21L
FARM NAME: _�... cx-as
REVIEWER: J . Jv --hr' _
DATE:��/
TYPE
NUMBER
# ANIMALS
LAGOON -PAN
POND - PAN
Farrow/Wean
sow
2.5=
5.4=
19=
Farrow/Feeder
sow
4=
6.5=
22=
Farrow/Finish
sow
10=
26=
91=
Wean/Feeder
head
1=
0.48=
1.6=
Feeder/Finish
head
1=
2.3=
7.9=
Gilt Developer
head
1=
2.5=
Boar Stud
head
1=
3.7=
DESIGNIVOLUME CALCULATIONS: WUP - Days of temporary storage: b�
Calcs - Days of temporary storage:
1-c-c o ..ro Q
Top of dike elevation: ��l-- ft- 1" 25 yr./24 hr. storm in.
Elev. below structural & storm storage: ft. 2"d 25 yr.124 hr. storm in.
Normal operating water level elevation: ft. Structural freeboard in.
(top of permanent storage):
Bottom elevation: ft.
Permanent storage volume ft3
Temporary storage volume -z� ft'
IRRIGATION: A-,
Operating Pressure (psi)
Flow (gpm):
Application Rate (in/hr)
Nozzle/Ring Size(s):
Design
Recorded
Design
Recorded
Design.
Design
Design
Design
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual
Exceeds required volume?,
Exceeds required volume?
FREEBOARD CK.
1
2
3
4
5
Water level reading
Top of dike reading
Difference
Marker reading

CAWMP Components
Permitted Facility; Date:
Completed Certification Form; Date:
Waste Utilization Plan; Date: 1r ��
Amount of plant available nitrog�n �ard ucedlused annuall ( �F;7z� Ibs) `7�$
Dominant soil serie ; �� `3 $Qa L-�c'eCrops to be grown
/ Field Maps��
Based on usable (Tot = Usable=
Present day format w/RYES or actual records; application windows 2/1/93;
Standard #633 required specifications
Emergency Action Plan
Odor Control Checklists (effective 1197)
Insect Control Checklist (effective 1197)
Mortality Checklist (effective 1197)
Type of irrigation: Traveling Gun Solid -Set all G Center Pivot Linear Move
Other (description):
NRCS irrigation parameters usable field size, max. application rate, max. application
rate per cycle (effective 911196) or
Calibration information or
Land application system design information (after 911196) including parameters,
equipment type, system layout and settings
Show design needs (storage & treatment calculations)
Operation & Maintenance Plan
Site schematic
Site evaluation, after 2196 (NRCS NC-CPA-17) includes wetlands determination
Hazard classification
Construction inspection notes, including liner inspection & observation trench (after
911196)
Consideration for emergency spillway (after 6/21196)
REQUIRED RECORDS effective 9/1/96
PERMITTED FACILITIES
Waste application records (IRR 1 &2) General Permit & COC on site
__,-Annual soil sample reports for 1999 weekly lagoon level records
(Cu index: )
(Zn index: )
Waste analysis - date last taken 4? P
s4U pc� , Y PAN Ibs/1000 gals. for struc ure #1 101_
PAN 1bs11000 gals. for structure #2

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
0 Division of Water Quality
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection H7 Is
`Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 0 Certified [3 Applied for Permit E3 Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
N !�✓" Count .... L1 N... S.I-t!{1. ................
Farm Name: CE.. .T.V /.............6 .......... L� %i G1{1�......... Y� .. ....................
OwnerName: ............................................... ... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:.............. . Phone No:
Mailing Address: ...............................................
ddress:................................................................................................................. .................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:... ,., e(„�. .... Integrator. ................ ...........................
Certified Operator: .................................................. ................................................ I ............ Operator Certification Number:.................... .........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' C� 6 0 64 Longitude ' ' «
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ONO
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
PfNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
VNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
�(No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? Of yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[ No
I Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
�No
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility in in design?
❑
not compliance with any applicable setback criteria effect at the time of -
Yes
.(No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
0-N'o
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes VNo
,Nlrctures (Lag2M.Holding Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structtur�e'' JJ1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:Alp
.........................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft): .... If. _.. 1. r A1... ......�....................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes [2(No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 9No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? eyes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures Iack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
�KNo
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
VNO
(If in excess of W��MPP,or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
/
15.
Crop type .&4.1tQ1))....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
.Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
,9,
Id No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[lNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
P No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�dNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
Egr
Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
P(No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
9No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
ElYes
0- No.violitions-or deficien6ies.werenated-during this:visit., Yo'U'Wifi receive-no�ftirther-:
eorrespondeh0 db:out this;
L44
Lv t T i exe;,5zelw ,z&� r 5 G Esn9 s�
TE cff TU��L�
G pv i - n o�•v ,L iv . H -s In l'}P t: — r '
i4mw� �NY� /�P�dt� rm�,r/�
t,Jl
P � - � Pi -AA) G-�� ILJ fs - CAN
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

PAS yx ,...; • - - .r.. i'_..;.: - .`u..�`. a a.. ,. .,. • ; . 4. F. 4,.. �&o ,.:::. - ..vsk.. Y4..o f.SiP': F ...... _ .. .. • so :.. K - 5. axY 'S
` F E�BSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
Oil] DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection A
3:..;.":
outine Q Com plaint 0 Follow-up of DW 1 ins ection
O Follow-up of DS%VC: review O Other
Facility Number
Date of lnspection 2 '
Time of Inspection `/ G' 11.124 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Titne (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Registered (3 Applied for Permit
(ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
Certified ❑ Permitted
or inspection (includes travel and processing)
0 Not Operational Date Last .................................................................................................................................................
LOperated
Farm N�ime:..�..(L.1!�1'.......-%��.....1'-:G�>`'.G•:......./"7??7
a: Conxtty:.::..�'..t.::...w:......................................
�;..
Owner Name: ! Phone No:.. .... ......... ....
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:,..........................,....................................
Phone No:...................................................
iltailingAddress:.............. ........................................ ...............................................................
..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:..J—&n. ......1.1.... z....LW ... I ......... �.�.� ...... Integrator:..........................................................................
.... ............
Certified Operator :................................... ........
.... Operator Certification Number ............
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 6 41 Longitude • & :g
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
e. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in sal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
ma i n to n ance/ improvement?
❑ Yes �TNo
❑ Yes VNO
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes PfNo
❑ Yes A,No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

•ility Number:-;
o Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures (Lagoons and/or )Molding fonds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure I Structure 3 Structure 4
:.................. ....... S..__5............... ...................................... ............................ ....
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ?,I
❑ Yes 4No
❑ Yes LI No
El Yes [�IVo
Structure 5 ructure 6
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VNo
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application`? ❑ YesNo
(If in excess of NMP, oar runoff ntering waters of the State, notify DWQ)� peI�m CTI*7��
-1
15. Crop type �xi.�( f.!!?, a.....`...... �C.j.....I.AJ1_L-k.T�.tl1..� � .. :. ., ( �..............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? Yes ❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
X No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes No
19,
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
9�0
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
XNo
For Certified Facilities On]
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
/"No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
VNo
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
JVNo
�?i1 U5
16.
7L� T�--
A-5 *U't--- P/_tqw-5
�� 0 i
%VEp-
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector
cc: Division of Water duality, Water
Section, Facility Assessment Unit
Date:
4/30/97

�.-�.
JUL—I4-1995 15: ?6 FROMDEM WATERER DUALITY SECTION TO PRO P.02i02
Site Requires Immediate Aacndor.-
Facility No. 57- 7y
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 3/- ?.S
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPEkATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: / u , 1995
Time:
ILZ 4--
Farm Name/Owner: W C 5 �6j e _r-li 0*1.-/ G ��ML-',S
Mailing Address: 3' ZL3 Gi S ��✓� r> C14 143,, 7 Zo -
County: -,to 4-
Integrator: _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ Phone:
On Site Representative: ' 14 Pt 1-1 Ctl _ — _ _ Phone:
Phvsical Addrress/Locadon:
Type of Operation: Swine J Poultry - Cattle
Design Capacity: 3 6 0 Number of Animals on Site;
0
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 5 _ ' y 0 /J Longitude: 7 J 0 _=S� Elevation: ---Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficientfreeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hoer storm event
(approximately 1 Foot -r 7 inches) Q or No Actual Freeboard: ��t- Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes Of No Was any erosion observed? Yes o L o
Is adequate land available for spray Yes Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate? r•No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?A& or No
100 Feet from Wells?Qs or No
to 37irnal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes orc
a:timal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feat of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes-
'�, animal waste discharged into waters of the state by than -made ditch, flushing system. or other
;ir^ilar man-made devices? Yes or �o if Ys. Please Explain.
k+ <5 talc facility maintain adequate waste numagernent records (volumes of manure, land apphr-d.
spray irrigated on spec acreage with cover crop)'' z or No
Additional Comments:
F-F
Si•gtzdture
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTat- P.02

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
NC State University
NC State University
13223 US 70 West
Clayton, NC 27520
919-SS3-2141
03-26-2014
This plan has been developed by:
Edward Humphrey
Johnston SWCD
2736 NC Highway 210
Smithfield, NC 27520
919-553-2141
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes'an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
t w. -
ignature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
? -.2 7
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:�
Technical Specialist SignatAe 0 Date
.. ... ...... ... .... .. ...... ..... ................_......._...................................__..__._ I ...........
677795 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-26-2014 Cover Page I

—� The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planted Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1847
F 1
4.10
3.80
NIA
Norfolk
Com, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1847
IA
1.10
0.93
NIA
Varina
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
Smell Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
1847
1;j ID
1.50
1.23
NIA
Varina
Com, Grain
100 bu.
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
1847
F 7
0.75
0.63
N/A
Varina
Corn, Grain
100 bu.
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
1847
f'
C— 8
1.50
1.32
NIA
INorfolk
Corn, Grain
l l5 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1847
9
0.65
0.50
N/A
Norfolk
lCorn. Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 9.60 S,41
LI `.
Potential Leaching
; .TechnYc41,Guidance
1,.ow potential to contribute to soluble
None
{ 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone -
2
Moderate
Moderate potential tocontribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Otber conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scaveugenutricnts, Sad -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of --field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffos
(391).
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/2/2010
PCs Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
Sl i
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid waste generated 332,046 gals/year by a 86 animal
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
512
Incorporated
980
Injected
969
Irrigated
557
Max. Avail.
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
557
1414
-857
843,272
-511,226
Year 2
557
1909
-1,252
1,078,466
-7461420
------------- -•-- - - - -----------
Noce: In source ID, 5 means standard source, i means user dei'med source. ------------------
• Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed; 06-02-2010 Source Page Page 1 of 1

i
The WasL eUtilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for t1 s ) eration. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of croplaudneeded to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximise nutrient uptake,
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops, An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Fable Year 1 4101
Tact
Field
source
ID
Soll Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RX8
Applic.
period
NStro}cn
PA
Nutrient
1Reld
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Rm
(lbs/A)
Apptic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 pis
tons
1847
l
Sl 1
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Com, Grain
A15 bu.
2/15.00
131
0
20
Irrig.
111
66.18
0.00
251.47
0.00
1847
1
S 11
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
5fl
29.81
0.00
113.27
0.00
1847
1A
S11
Varins.
1.101
0.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3/i-9130
266
0
0
Irrig.
266
158.58
0.00
147.48
0.
1847
1 A
S 11
Varina
1.10
0.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1.3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
1 20
11.92
0.00
11.09
0,00
1847
1 B
s l !
Varina
1.50
1.23
Can, Grain
100 bu.
2115-6/30
Ill
0
20
brig.
1 91
54.25
0.00
66.73
0.00
1847
!B
Sl 1
Varina
1.50
1.23
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
40
23.85
0.00
29.33
0.00
1847
7
S 11
Varina
0.75
0.63
Corn, Grain
100 bu.
2/15-6/30
111
0
20
Irrig.
91
54.25
0.00
34.18
0.00
1847
7
S 1 l
Varina
0.75
0.63
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1.4/30
100
0
0
brig.
40
23.85
0.00
15,02
0.00
1847
8
S 1 i
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2115-Wo
131
0
20
brig.
111
66.18
0.00
87.35
0.00
1847
8
S11
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
50
29.81
0.00
39.35
0.00
1847
9
S1'1
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2115-Wo
131
0
20
brig.
111
66.18
0.00
33.09
0.00
1847
9
Si 1
orfolk
0.65
0.5D
Wheat, Gmin
60 bu.
911-4/30
125
0
0
brig.
50
29.81
0.0
14.90
0.00
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2010 WUT Page Page I of 3

Waste Uti, in Table
)ear 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Sod Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
1?eriod
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Wd
(IisslA)
Comm.
Fee..
Nutrient
Appled
(IWA)
Res.
OWA)
Appiic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nu '
pplied
(RWA)
liquid
ManareA
pplied
(acre}
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acrc)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
t000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
943.27
P. _ A
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
332.05
r '
Balance, 1000 gallons
-511.23
1a
Total Applied, tons.
"t)
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance. tons
OEM,
0.00
Notes: 1. in the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol "means user entered data.
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 612/2010 WLYT Page Page 2 of 3

Waste UbI in Table
- Iear 2
Tract
Field
Source
iD
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Ntrogm
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
fed.
Nutrient
Applied
pbs/A)
Res.
(lbslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
N
pplied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
Manurk A
pp1ied
(acts)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Ma2u a
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manus
Applied '
(Feld)
N
N
N
N
1000
ga1/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1847
1
Sll
Norfolk
4,10
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 be.
9/1-4130
125
0
0
Irrig.
75
44.71
0.00
169.91
0.00
1847
1
S11
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Soybeans, Manures}, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9115
137
0
1 0
Irrig.
13
$1.68
0.00
310.37
0,00
1947
IA
Sl 1
Farina
1.10
0.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tans
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
30
17.89
0.00
16.63
0.00
1847
IA
S11
Varina
l.lo
0.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
311-9/30
266
0
0
brig.
26
158.58
0.00
147.48
0.00
1947
1 B
S11
Varina
1.50
1.23
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
brig.
60
35.77
0,00
44.00
0.00
1847
1B
S11
Varina
1.50
1,23
Soybeans, Manured,Double Crop
32be.
4/1-9115
124
0
0
Grip,
124
73.93
0,00
90.93
0.00
1947
7
S11
Varins
0.75
0.63
Wheat, Grain
50 ba.
9114/30 1
100
0
0
Irrig.
60
35.77
0.00
22.54
0.00
1847
7
S11
varina
0.75
0.63
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 ba.
4/1-9/15 1
124
0
0
brig.
124
73.93
0.00
46.57
0.00
1847
8
SI 1
Norfolk
1.30
1.32
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14130
125
0
0
Irrig. 1
75
44.71
0,00
59.02
0.00
1947
8
S11
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
brig.
137
81.68
0.00
107.81
0.00
1847
9
SI1
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Wheat, Crain'
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
75
44.71
0.00
22.36
0.00
1947
9
S11
Norfolk
0,65
0.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
hrip.
137
81.68
0.00
40.841
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,078.47""'
Total lWduced, I000 gallons
332.05
Balance, 1000 gallons
-746.42
Total Applied, tons`
>'Y
0.00
Total Produced, tons
c
0.
Balance, tons
0.00
Dotes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol mums leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol " means user entered data.
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/2/2010
WUT Page Page 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the raaxinaum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event:
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application hate
(inchesthour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1847
1
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1847
IA
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
1B
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
7
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
S
orfolk
0.50
1.0
1847
9
orfolk
0.50
1.0
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/2/2010 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effiuerlt. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Iblac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrow Feeder Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
3.07
6.14
9.21
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26-32
1.54
3.07
4.61
Soybean 40 bu
160
14-04
218
5.76
9.64
!�
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-02-2010 Sludge Page Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the lust crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accummulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name
Swine Farrow -Feeder tagoon 11 uid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
104
1
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
173
1
8
166
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
I80
2
1
180
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119
2
12
88
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
--- --------------------------------------------------•-•--....------------------------------------------------------ ...._.._._.
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-02-2.010 Capacity Page Page I o€1

111 �1. Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
J.- Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 toms per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ---------------------
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed- 6/2/2010 Specification Page 1

S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
553314 Database Version 3.1 Dale Printed: 6/2/2010 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 50 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
---
553314 - Database Version 3.1 mate Printed: 6/2/201 O Specification Page 3

Crap Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1B, 7
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbslacre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 8, 9
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbslacre N and 20-301bs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
------------------------------------------------------------------•--------------------- — ---- ------------
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-02-2010 CropNote Page Page 1 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): I
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced I' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s). 1 A
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15 November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
---------------------------- g g
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-02-2010 CropNote Page Page 2 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 113, 7
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of FebruaryMarch. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 8, 9
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase.the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
i-. "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1B, 7
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-02-2010 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 8, 9
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain_ Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as passible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 5-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at Ieast 100/9 for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
—�
553314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed. 06-02-2010 Crop Note Page Page 4 of

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utili.
This plan has been prepared for:
NC State University
NC State University
13223 US 70 West
Clayton, NC 2 752 0
919-553-2141
03-12-2012
This plan has been
Edward Humphrey
Johnston SWCD
2736 NC Highway210
Smithfield, NC 27577
919-934-7156
RAR20201
2
oped
-�'' nfWe
EdgL6--� I 6cla,
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) r[>Lsu C�,2S 'Sw� C✓�`�
Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.'Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: _3, f 131'-w1I
Technical Specialist Signature Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
325211 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012
Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S5
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid waste generated 287,073 gals/year by a 1,503 animal
Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
661
Incorporated
1136
Injected
1251
.Irrigated
719
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
'Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
1719
1291
-572
515,742
-228,669
Year 2
719
1809
-1,090
722,573
-435,500
--------------------------b-,------------------------------------------------------------- s---------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, 5 means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
325211 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1847
1
4.10
3.80
i NIA
Norfolk
Com, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1847
IA
1.10
0.93
N/A
Varina
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
1847
1B
1.50
1.23
NIA
Varina
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
1847
7
0.751
0,63
NIA
Varina
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
1847
8
1.50
1.32
NIA
INorfolk
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1847
9
0.65
0.50
NIA
Norfolk
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 9.60 8.41
" `LT `
� " �PolentW Leaching "'
Technrcal'Guldance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
�— 2 &
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
325211 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/12/2012
PCS Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Prod
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1847
l
S5
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig,
1 I 1
44.34
0.00
168.48
0.00
1847
1
S5
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14130
125
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
75.89
0.00
1847
lA
S5
Varina
1.10
0.93
Hybrid Be.dagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3/1-9130
266
0
0
Irrig.
266
106.25
0.00
98.81
0.00
1847
IA
S5
Varina
1.10
0.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
7.991
0.00
7.43
0.00
1847
1 B
S5
Varina
1.50
1.23
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
3/15-8/31
77
0
20
Irrig.
57
22.77
0.00
28.01
0.00
1847
1 B
I S5
Varina
1.50
1.23
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
40
15.98
0.00
19.65
0.00
1847
7
S5
Varina
0.75
0.63
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
3/15-8/31
77
0
20
Irrig.
57
22.77
0.00
14.34
0.00
1847
7
S5
Varina
0.75
0.63
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
911-4130
100
0
0
Irrig.
40
15.98
0.00
10.07
0.00
1847
8
S5
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
20
Irrig.
78
31.16
0.00
41.13
0.00
1847
8
S5
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
OM
26.36
0.00
1847
9
S5
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
20
Irrig.
78
31.16
OM
15.58
0.00
1847
9
S5
Norfolk 1
0.65
0.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9114130
125
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
9.99
0.00
325211 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 WUT Page Page 1 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(lbslA)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
NutrientA
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Reqd
Applied
pplied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(lbs1A)
(lbs/A)
(Ibs/A)
Source
Total
Use.
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Smes
Acres
Acres
Crop
p
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
!� VA
Tons
1000 Is
�
tons .
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
515.74
'w
Total Produced 1040 gallons
2$7.07
Balance, 1000 gallons
-228.67
Total Applied, tons
-
0.00
Total Produced, tons
,-
0.00
Balance, tons=
-=
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
325211 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 WUT Page Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutfientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Mangy
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1847
1
S5
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-4/30
125
D
D
Irrig.
75
29.96
0.00
113.84
0.D0
1847
1
S5
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Soybeans, Martured, Double Crop
35 bu.
411-9115
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54.72
0.00
20795
0.00
1847
lA
S5
Varina
1.10
0.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
1 brig.
30
11.98
0.00
11.14
0.00
1847
lA
S5
Varina
1.10
0.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
266
0
0
Irrig.
266
106.251
0.00
98.81
0,00
1847
1B
S5
Varina
1.50
1.23
Wheat, Grain
50bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
60
23.97
0.00
29.48
0,00
1847
1B
S5
Varina
1.50
1.23
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
4/1-9/15
124
0
0
Irrig.
124
49.53
0.00
60.92
0.00
1847
7
S5
Varina
0.75
0.63
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/14/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
60
23.97
0.00
15,10
0.00
1847
7
S5
Varina
0.75
0.63
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
4/1-9/15
124
0
0
Irrig.
124
49.53
0.00
31.20
0.00
1847
8
S5
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
75
29.96
0.00
39.54
0.00
1847
8
S5
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
1 137
0
0
brig.
137
54.72
0.00
72.24
0.00
1847
9
S5
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-1/30
125
0
0
1 Irrig.
75
29.96
0.00
14.98
0.00
1847
9
S5
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
1 Irrig.
I 137
54.72
0.00
27.36
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
722.57_
c_
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
287.07
Balance, 1000 gallons
-435.5
Total Applied, tons
_ -
0,00
Total Produced, tonsr--��
::._
0.00
Balance, tons==
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
325211 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012
WUT Page Page 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1847
1
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1847
IA
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
1B
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
7
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
8
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1847
1 9
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
325211 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/12/2012 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Nursery Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
3.83
7.65
11.48
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
1.91
3.83
5.74
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
3.59
7.17
10.76
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------------ • --------------------------------------
325211 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Sludge Page Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
I Swine Nursery Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
911
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
43
1
3
99
1
4
156
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
190
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
180
2
1
180
2
2
I80
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119
2
12
88
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
325211 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Uti
This plan has been prepared for:
NC State University
NC State University
13223 US 70 West
Clayton, NC 27520
919-553-2141
03-12-2012
This plan has been develope
Edward Humphrey
Johnston SWCD
2 73 6 NC Highway210
Smithfield, NC 27577
919-934-7156
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) tO {"`�"`` Date
// Signature (manager or irroducer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: 31 t,3 laota
Technical Specialist Signature Date
------------ - - - - - - - --- --------- --- - - ----- - - ---- - - - -------------- ---- --------------------- --- - -------------- - - - - -- -- - - - ------ ----------- -- - ---
830984 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S 13
Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 324,818 gals/year by a 31 animal
Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
748
Incorporated
1285
Injected
1415
Irrigated
813
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
813
1291
478
604,837
-280,019
Year 2
813
1809
-996
722,573
-397,755
----------- ---- --- - --- ----- ------ ----- ---- -- ---- -------------- -- -- -- --- ------- --- -----------------------------------------------------
830984 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1847
1
4.10
3.80
N/A
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1847
IA
1.10
0.93
N/A
Varina
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
1847
1B
1.50
t.23
N/A
Varina
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop.
32 bu.
1847
7
0.75
0.63
N/A
lVarina
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
1847
8
1.50
1.32
NIA
Norfolk
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1847
9
0.65
0.50
N/A .
Norfolk
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 9.60 8.41
Technical"Guuia`nce,``�'
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
< 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
>— 2 &
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<µ 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -Feld practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
830984 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/12/2012
PCS Page Page 1 of I
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applies
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1847
1
S13
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Com, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig,
111
44.34
0.00
168.48
0.00
1847
1
S13
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
brig.
50
42.44
0.00
161.27
0.00
1847
1A
S13
Varina
1.10
0.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
266
0
0
Irrig.
266
106.25
0.00
98.81
0.00
1847
IA
S13
Varina
1.10
0.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
20
11.98
0.00
11.14
0.00
1847
1B
S13
Varina
1.50
1.23
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
3/15-8/31
77
0
20
Irrig.
57
22.77
0.00
28.01
0.00
1847
1B
S13
Varina
1.50
1.23
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig,
40
15.98
0.00
19.65
0.00
1847
7
S13
Varina
0.751
0.63
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
3/15-8/31
77
0 1
20
Irrig.
57
22.77
0.0
14.34
0.00
1847
7
S13
Varina
0.75
0.63
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
40
15.98
0.00
10.07
0.00
1847
8
S13
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
20
Irrig.
78
31.16
0.00
41.13
0.00
1847
8
S13
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4130
125
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
26.36
0.00
1847
9
S13
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
20
Img.
78
31.16
0.00
15.58
0.00
1847
9
S13
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
9.99
0.00
830984 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 WUT Page Page 1 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(lbs/A)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure -
Nutrient
Nutrient
NutrientA
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
RegU
Applied
pplied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(Ibs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbsIA)
Source
Total
Use.
Applic.
Applic,
1000
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied 1000 gallons
604.84
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
324.82
Balance, 1000 gallons
-280.02
'r-3=
Total Applied, tons
Him
0.00
Total Produced, tons-
0.00
Balance,tons
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
830984 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 WUT Page Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManurcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure -
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
92VA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1847
1
S13
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
brig.
75
29.96
0.00
113.84
0.00
1847
1
S13
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
411-9/15
137
0
0
irrig.
137
54.72
0.00
207.95
0.00
1847
lA
S13
Varina
1.10
0.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.OTons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
30
11.98
0.00
11.14
0.00
1847
lA
S13
Varina
1,10
0.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
266
0
0
Irrig.
266
106.25
0.00
98.81
0.00
1847
IB
S13
Varina
1.50
1,23
Wheat, Grain
50 hu.
9114/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
60
23.97
0.00
29.48
0.00
1847
IB
S13
Varina
1.50
1,23
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
4/1-9/15
124
0
0
[trig.
124
49.53
0.00
60.92
0.00
1847
7
S13
Varina
0.75
0,63
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9114130
100
0
0
Irrig.
60
23,97
0.00
15.10
0.00
1847
7
S13
Varina
0.75
0,63
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
4/1-9/15
124
0
0
Irrig.
124
49.53
0.00
31.20
0.00
1847.
8
S13
Norfolk
1,50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
60 bu,
911-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
75
29.96
0.00
39.54
0.00
1847
8
SO
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig_
137
54,72
0.00
72.24
0.00
1847
9
S13
Norfolk
0,65
0.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14130
125
0
0
Irrig.
75
29.96
0.00
14.98
0.00
1847
9
S] 3
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
brig.
137
54.72
0.00
27.36
0,00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
722.57
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
324.82",
Balance, 1000 gallons
-397.76
`�-�= "
US
Total Applied, tons
i^'
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, torts
a •
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
830984 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012
W1JT Page Page 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. if
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1847
1
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1847
IA
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
113
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
7
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
8
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1847
L 9
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
830984 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/12/2012 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
150
13.16
4.50
9.00
13.50
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
2.25
4.50
6.75
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
4.22
8.44
12.65
------------•------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•-----•••------------------------------- ----••---------------------------------
830984 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-20I2 Sludge Page Page I of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. if available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
I Swine Farrow -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
911
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
70
1
3
152
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
177
1
8
174
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
180
2
1
180
2
2
180
2
3
I80
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119
2
12
88
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
--------------------------------------------------•-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
830984 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
NC State University
NC State University
13223 US 70 West
Clayton, NC 27520
919-553-2141
03-12-2012
This plan
has been develo ed/b s §
i 8
Edward Humphrey MAR 2 0 2012
Johnston SWCD
2736 NC Highway210 p P 6r1,�
Smithfield, NC 27577
919-934-7156
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
-/.4 'f2
Signature (owner)" Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: F—la.--
Technical Specialist Signature Date '
--- • --------------------------------------------•-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
298355 Database Version 31 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 309,618 gals/year by a 334 animal
Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
713
Incorporated
1225
Injected
1349
Irrigated
775
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
775
1344
-569
537,036
-227,418
Year 2
775
1756
-981
701,279
-391,661
----------------- --- ------ ----- --- -- -------------- ----------------- -- '--- --- ---------•--------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
298355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates.
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
kYE
1847
1
4.10
3.80
NIA
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1847
IA
1.10
0.93
NIA
Varina
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
1847
1B
1.50
1.23
NIA
Varina
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
1847
7
0.751
0.63
NIA
Varina
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
1847
8
1.50
1.32
NIA
Norfolk
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1847
9
0.65
0.50
NIA
Norfolk
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 9.60 8.41
'oIh "n nea, dalLeaching '
.'' M'w ian�ci' e L- .. l...F •
i" "
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
[ 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
>= 2 &
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
[= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
298355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/12/2012
PCs Page Page 1 of l
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to,
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field �
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
p
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
!� 1/A
Tons
1000 is
�
tons
1847
1
S7
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Com, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
111
44.34
0.00
168.48
0.00
1847
1
S7
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Itrig.
58
22.97
0.00
87.29
0.00
1847
1A
S7
IVafina
.1.10
0.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
266
0
0
Irrig.
266
106.25
0.00
98.81
0.00
1847
lA
S7
Varina
1,101
0.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig_
20
7.99
0.00
7.43
0.00
1847
IB
S7
Varina
1.50
1.23
Sorghum, Grain
45CWT
3/15-8131
77
0
20
Irrig.
57
22.77
0.00
28.01
0.00
1847
18
S7
Varina
1.50
1.23
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
46
18.37
0.00
22.60
0.00
1847
7
-S7
Varina
0.75
0.63
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
3/15-8/31
77
0
20
Irrig.
57
22.77
0.00
14.34
0.00
1847
7
S7
Varina
0.75
0.63
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9114/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
46
18.37
0.00
11.58
0.0o
1847
8
S7
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3115-8131
98
0
20
Irrig.
78
31.16
0.00
41.13
0.00
1847
8
S7
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
brig.
58
22.97
0.00
30.32
0.00
1847
9
S7
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
20
brig.
78
31.16
0.00
15.58
0.00
1847
9
S7
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
D
0
hrig.
58
22.97
0.00
11A8
0.00
298355 . Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 WUT Page Page 1 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(lbs/A)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
NutrientA
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Req'd
Applied
pplied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
Source
Total
Use,
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
537.04
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
309.62
Balance, 1000 gallons
-227.42
rg#
Total Applied, tons
— -
0.00
Total Produced, tons
-
0.00
a=�=
Balance, tons
=-
0.00
Notes: 1. [n the tract column, —symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol " means user entered data.
298355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 WUT Page Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract.
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Pert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1947
1
S7
Norfolk
4.10
3.90
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-4/34
125
0
0
]Trig.
68
26.96
0.00
102.46
0.00
1847
1
S7
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
411-9115
137
0
0
brig.
137
54.72
0.00
207.95
0.00
1847
IA
S7
Varina
1.10
093
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
54
0
0
1rrig.
30
11.98
0.00
11.14
0_00
1847
IA
S7
Varina
1.10
0.93
Hybrid Betmudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3/1-9130
266
0
0 1
Irrig.
26
106.25
0.00
98.81
0.00
1847
IB
S7
Varina
1.50
1.23
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
ITrig.
54
21.57
0.00
26.53
0.00
1847
1B
S7
Varina
1.50
113
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
4/1-9/15
124
0
0
Irrig.
124
49.53
0.00
60.92
0.00
1847
7
S7
Varina
0.75
0.63
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4130
100
0
0
Irrig.
54
21.57
0.00
13.59
0.00
1847
7
S7
Varina
0.75
0.63
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
4/1-9/15
124
0
0
Irrig.
124
49.53
0.00
31.20
0.00
1847
8
S7
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
68
26.96
0.00
35.59
0.00
1847
8
S7
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
54.72
0,00
72.24
0.00
1847
9
S7
Norfolk
0.65
0.54
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
68
26.96
0.00
13.48
0.00
1847
9
S7
Norfolk
1 0.65
0.50
1 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
brig.
137
54.72
0.00
27.36
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
701.28
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
309.62
Balance, 1000 gallons
-391.66'
J0.00
Total Applied, tons
E-g!
Total Produced, tons=
^ . =
0.00
Balance. tons
�M =M
0.00
)`Totes: 1. in the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
298355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012
WUT Page Page 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1847
1
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1847
1A
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
1B
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
7
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
8
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1847
1 9
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
298355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/12/2012 IAF Page Page 1 of I
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application'. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feedcr-Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
4.19
8.37
12.56
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
2.09
4.19
6.28
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
3.93
7.85
11.78
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .-...g .. g.
298355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Sludg a Pa a Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storatre Capacity
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
40
1
3
90
1
.4
141
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
178
1
8
176
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
180
2
1
180
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119
2
12
88
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
----------------------------------- --------- .. -- g g
298355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 CapacityPaa Pa e 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the.
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an. agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA,'NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
298355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the. animal waste management system.
298355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected. on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. 'A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
----------------------------------------------------------------- - ..-•--- -
298355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 Specification Pape 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbslacre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): IA
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced V to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and duly. For established stands apply 180 to 240
Ib/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- • ---------------------------...------------------------------------------------
29s355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Crop'Note Page Page I of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): IA
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): IB, 7
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 8, 9
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
248355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 3

Grain Sorghum
Grain Sorghum
The following crop note applies to field(s): 113, 7
The following crop note applies to field(s): 8, 9
The following crop note applies to field(s): 113, 7
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/roW foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8.seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s)-. 1, 8, 9
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 24 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-12112" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------
298355 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 3

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste U
This plan has been prepared for:
NC State University
NC State University
13223 US 70 West
Clayton, NC 27520
919-553-2141
v� /I
tion �qy �✓
{
�rA
This plan has been developed by.',:,
Edward Humphrey
Johnston SWCD
2736 NC Highway210
Smithfield, NC 27577
919-934-7156
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
`04�
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
ram, i.2-
Signature (owner) /1/CS[/'Ce�C-s"'`"` ��c luc. t Date
"A.
-�3-��-
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: \ 6
Technical Specialist Signature W Date
402995
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Cover Page 1
r)l

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S9
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid waste generated 333,112 gals/year by a 104
animal Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility
has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
514
Incorporated
883
Injected
972
Irrigated
559
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
559
1291
-732
769,764
-436,652
Year 2
559
1809
-1,250
1,078,466
-745,354
-------- In ---s-ou---rce -ID-, - ----m--eans---------- --standard- -- --, --U --------eans-----user --defi----- ne--d ---s-our----c----------------------------------------------------
Note: S --sourceme.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
402995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1847
1
4.10
3.80
NIA
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1847
IA,
1.10
0,93
NIA
Varina
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
1847
1 B
1.50
1.23
NIA
Varina
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
1847
7
0.751
0.63
NIA
Varina
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
1847
1 8
1,50
1.32
NIA
Norfolk
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1847
9
0,65
0.50
NIA
lNorfolk
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 9.60 8.41
:Poleniial Leaching
.' r Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone..
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should he planned.
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -Field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
402995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/12/2012
PCs Page Page 1 of l
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Ilse_
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(IWA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
I OW gals
tons
1847
1
S9
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2115-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
111
66.18
0.00
251.47
0.00
1847
1
S9
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
50
29.81
0.00
113.27
OM
1847
lA
S9
Varina
1.10
0.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
311-9/30
266
.0
0
Irrig,
266
15g.58
0.00
147,48
0.00
1847
1 A
S9
Varina
1.10
0.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0.00
11.09
0.00
1847
1 B
S9
Varina
1.50
1.23
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
3/15-8131
77
0
20
Irrig.
57
33.98
0.00
41.80
0.00
1847
1 B
S9
Varina
1.50
1.23
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
40
23.85
0.00
29.33
0.00
1847
7
S9
Varina
0.75
0.63
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
3115-8131
77
0
20
In*
57
33.98
0.00
21.41
0.00
1847
7
S9
Varina
0.75
0.63
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/14/30
100
0
0
brig.
40
23.85
0.00
15.02
0.00
1847
8
S9
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8131
98
0
20
Inig.
78
46.50
0.00
61.38
0.00
1847
8
S9
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
50
29.81
0.00
39.35
0.00
1947
9
S9
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
20
Irrig.
78
46.50
0.00
23.25
OM
1847
9
S9
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
brig.
50
29.81
Q.00
14.90
0.00
402995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 WUT Page Page 1 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
769.76'
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
333.11
Balance, 1000 gallons
-436.65
„
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons'•+
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, awned. 2. Symbol ' means user entered data.
402995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 W TT Page Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs1A)
Comm.
Fert-
Nutrient
Applied
(IWA)
Res.
(IWA)
Applies
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManuteA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied -
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal1A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1847
1
S9
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
brig.
75
44.71
0.00
169.91
0,00
1847
1
S9
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig,
137
81,68
0.00
310.37
0,00
1847
IA
S9
Varina
1.101
0.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
30
17,89
0.00
16.63
0.00
1847
IA
S9
Varina
I.10
0.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
311-9/30
266
0
0
Irrig.
266
158.58
0.00
147.48
0.00
1847
1B
S9
Varina
1.50
1.23
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig,
60
35,77
0.00
44.00
0.00
1947
1B
S9
Varina
1.50
1.23
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
411-9/15
124
0
0
Irrig.
124
73.93
0.00
90.93
0.00
1947
7
S9
Varina
0.75
0.63
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4130
100
0
0
brig.
60
35.77
0.00
22.54
0,00
1847
7
S9
Varina
0.75
0.63
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
411-9/15
124
0
0
Irrig.
124
73.93
0.00
46.37
0,00
1847
8
S9
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
brig_
75
44.71
0.00
59.02
0.00
1847
8
S9
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
81.68
0.00
107.81
0.00
1847
9
S9
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9114/30
125
0
0
hrig.
75
44.71
0.00
22.36
0.00
1847
9
S9
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
411-9115
137
0
0
Irrig.
1 137
81.68
0.00
40.84
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,078.47
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
333.11
Balance, 1000 gallons
-745.35
Total Applied, tons
a�„M
0.00
Total Produced, tons
__Y^'
0.00
Balance, tons
==-
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data_
402995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012
WUT Page Page 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each Feld selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1847
1
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1847
lA
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
1B
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
7
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
8
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1847
1 9
INorfolk
0.50
1.0
402995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/12/2012 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gallac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
IS Years Accumulation
Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
150
13.16
3.08
6.16
9.25
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
1.54
3.08
4.62
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
2.89
5.78
8.67
----- - -------- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- ----- - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - ------ ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------- ----------- -- ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- ----- -- - - - - -
402995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Sludge Page Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
I Swine Farrowing-Weanling Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
55
1
3
136
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
180
1
12
180
2
1
180
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119
2
12
88
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
------------------ ---- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•---------------------------------------------
402995 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
NC State University
NC State University
13223 US 70 West
Clayton, NC 2 752 0
919-553-2141
03-12-2012
This plan has been developed by:
Edward Humphrey
Johnston SWCD
2736 NC Highway210
Smithfzeld, NC 27577
919-934-7156
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) i0�4/ L��S �"i°' ` E✓c P cam..
�"' 'a
Signature (manager or producer)
4- -/ �2-
Date
l2.
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: U3 ( 13 / r 0I'-L
Technical Specialist Signature Date
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
596587 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S 11
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid waste generated 332,046 gals/year by a 86 animal
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
512
Incorporated
880
Injected
969
Irrigated
557
Max. Avail,
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
557
1291
-734
769,764
-437,718
Year 2
557
1809
-1,252
1,078,466
-746,420
No
-te: --------- In ---s-ou---rce -- IDb,, ------means -----------standa--r- d---sou--- rce, ---------- ans-- - -- user --d--e- -- --ed ----sour----c--.--------------------------------------------------------------
S U mefine
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
596587 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1847
1
4.10
3.80
NIA
Norfolk
Com, Grain
115 bu.
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1847
1 A
1.10
0.93
N/A
Varina
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
1947
1 B
1.501
1.23
NIA
Varina
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
1847
7
0.75
0.63
NIA
Varina
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
Wheat, Grain
50 bu,
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
1847
8
1.50
1.32
NIA
Norfolk
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
1847
9
0.65
0.50
NIA
Norfolk
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 9.60 8.41
LI
.. ; Pbleitltal Leac�liingfi
} °` °, TechWcal'Guidan'c'e
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned,
�_ z &
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
<= 10
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
596587 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/12=12
PCS Page Page l of l
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the craps to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crap
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs1A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(1bs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1847
1
S11
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Corn, Grain
115 bu.
2/15-6/30
131
0
20
Irrig.
111
66.18
0.00
251.47
0,00
1847
1
SI 1
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4130
125
0
0
brig.
50
29.81
0.00
113.27
0.00
1847
IA
SI1
Varina
1.10
0.93
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
311-9/30
266
0
0
brig.
266
158.58
0.00
147.48
0.00
1847
1A
S11
Varina
1.10
0.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
20
11.92
0.00
11.09
0.00
1847
iB
Sl l
Varina
1.50
1.23
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
3115-8/31
77
0
20
Irrig.
57
33.98
0.00
41,80
0,00
1847
113
SI1
Varina
1.50
113
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4130
i00
0
0
brig.
40
23.85
0.00
29.33
0.00
1847
7
SI1
Varina
0.75
0.63
Sorghum, Grain
45 CWT
3115-8/31
77
0
20
Irrig.
57
33.98
0.00
21,41
0.00
1847
7
S11
Varina
0.75
0.63
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig,
40
23.85
0.00
15.02
0.00
1847
8
S11
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
20
Irrig.
78
46.50
0.00
61.38
0.00
1847
8
S11
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
60 bu_
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
50
29.81
OAO
39.35
0.00
1847
9
S11
Norfolk
0.65
0.30
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
20
Irrig.
78
46.50
O.00
23.25
0.00
1847
9
S11
Norfolk
0,65
0.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
50
29.81
0.00
14.90
0.00
596587 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 WUT Page Page 1 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fert.
(WA)
PA
ManureA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
NutrientA
pplied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Reqd
Applied
pplied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
Source
Total
use.
Applic.
Applic.
1000
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal1A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
769.76
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
332.05
==_
Balance, 1000 gallons
-437.72
%—
Total Applied, tons,
0.00
Total Produced, torn
_=
0.00
Balance, tons
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
596587 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012 WUT Page Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
P
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManurcA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
� 1/A
Tons
gals
1000 Is
tons
1847
1
S l l
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig,
75
44,71
0.00
169.91
0,00
1847
1
S1I
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
81.68
0.00
310.37
0.00
1847
IA
S11
Varina
1.10
0.93
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
30
17,89
0,00
16.63
0.00
1847
lA
S11
Varina
1.10
0.93
hybrid Berrnudagrass Hay
6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
266
0
0
brig.
266
158,58
0.00
147.48
0.00
1847
i8
Sll
Varina
1.50
1.23
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
60
35.77
0.00
44.00
0.00
1847
IB
S11
Varina
1.50
1.23
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32bu.
4/1-9/15
124
0
0
brig.
124
73.93
0.00
90.93
0.00
1847
7
S11
Varina
0,75
0.63
Wheat, Grain
50 bu.
9/1-4/30
100
0
0
Irrig.
60
35,77
0.00
22.54
0.00
1847
7
S11
Varina
0.75
0.63
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
4/1-9115
124
0
0
Irrig.
124
73.93
0.00
46.57
0.00
1847
8
S1 I
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
75
44.71
0.00
59.02
0.00
1847
8
S11
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
81.68
0.00
107.81
0.00
1847
9
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
911-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
75
44.71
0.00
22.36
0.00
1847
9
dS1
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
brig.
137
81,68
0,00
40.84
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,078.47
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
332.05_
Balance, 1000 gallons
-746.42
a a_''. -=
Total Applied, tons
r:=
0.00
Total Produced, tons
-a-
0.00
Balance, tons
: 2's
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, -- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
596587 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/12/2012
WUT Page Page 3 of 3

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1847
1
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
1847
IA
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
113
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
7
Varina
0.50
1.0
1847
8
Norfolk ,
0.50
1.0
1847
9
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
596587 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/12/2012 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Ib/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
3.07
6.14
9.21
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
1.54
3.07
4,61
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
2.88
5.76
8.64
------------------------------------------------------------------------ •-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
596587 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Sludge Page Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name
I Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Ligin
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
28
1
2
55
1
3
136
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
180
I
12
180
2
1
180
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
149
2
11
119
2-
12
88
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month. -
-- - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
596587 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-12-2012 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

r
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
01-27-2003 511103
This plan has been prepared for:
NC State University
NC State University
13223 US 70 West
Clayton, NC 27520
919-553-2141 -
This plan has been developed by:
Edward Humphrey
NRCS
806 North Street
Smithfield, NC 2 75 77
919-934-7156 x.3
a
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
,,Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are'ineluded with
this s plan. '
Signature (owner)
Date
Signature (manager r producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resourc s Conservation Se ice-or'the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and ffate Conservatio onnmission.
!1 ., 1
Plan Approved By
--------------------------- ------------------------------------- -- ..---
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-27-2003
So / 0
Cover Page l

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
Allowing source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 309,618 gals/year by
a 334 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
713
Incorporated
1225
Injected
1349
Irrigated
775
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
1,470.66
587,445
-277,827
Year 2
1,883.00
752,147
-442,529
--- -- -------------------- -- --------- - --- -•---- --- ---- --
Note: In source ID, S means standard source - , U means user defined source.
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-27-2003 Source Page I of I

]
i"
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field.
Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each
field is shown, where available.
Planned Crons Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Se uence
RYE
1847
1
NIA
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
Wheat, Grain
59 bu,
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
1847
]A
NIA
Varina
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5,9 Tons
1847
1 B
N/A
Varina
Corn, Grain
98 bu.
Wheat, drain
49 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
$47
7
NIA
Varina
Corn, Grain
98 bu.
Wheat, Grain
49 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
` 1847
8
WA
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
113.bu.
r
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
1847
9
NIA
Norfolk
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
:
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop'
34 bu.
'L-'I ` 1
' Potential Leachin
Technical Guidance
a '!
Low potential to contribute to
None
,;; _•
soluble nutrient leaching below the
{,
root zone.
N 46derate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
IO
soluble nutrient leaching below the
y<
ootzone.
High potential to'contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
soluble,nutrient leaching below the
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
root'zone.
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod-B ased Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-27-2003 PCS Page I of I
NOTE: Symbol ' means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the'number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field -in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being'applied. Soil tests should be used
to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of
animal waste be'limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract.
Field
Source
I.D.
I Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
QhRIA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
QV
Res.
(lbs/A)
;x',
Applic.
I Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
Na4
N
lbs/A,
1000
::: gaVA. I
tons
I 1000 gals
tons
1
S7
Norfolk
4.10
310
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
2115-6/30
129
1
20
brill
109
43.54
p
165.45
0.00
1847
1
S7
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-3/31
* 132
0
0
Irrig.
53
21.09
0
80.14
0.00
1847
IA
S7
Varina
1.10
0.93
Small
1.0Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0
19.57
0.00
1847
IA
S7
Varina
1.10
0.93
�Grain
nOverseed
Fi nd Berms s ay
5.9 Tons
3/1-9/30
*270
0
0
Irrig.
270
107.85
0
100.30
0-OD
1947
1B
S7
Varina
1.50
1.23
Carl, Grain
98 bu.
2/15-6/30
109
0
20
brig.
89
35.55
0
43.73
0-00
1847
1B
S7
Varina
1.50
1.23
Wheat Grai%,,,,
49bu.
9/1-3/31
*132
0
0
Irrig.
531
1 21.09
0
25.94
0.00
1847
7
S7
Vagina
0.75
0.63
Coin, Grain
98 bu.
2/15-6/30
109
0
20
Irrig.
89
35.55
0
22.40
0.00
1847
7
S7
Varina
0.73
0.63
Wheat, Grain
49 bu.
9/1-3/31
* 132
0
0
Irrig.
53
21.09
0
13.29
0.00
18471
8
S7
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
2115-6/30
129
0
20
Irrig.
109
43.54
0
57.47
0.00
1847
8
S7
Norfolk
1-50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-3/31
*132
0
0
Irrig.
53
21.09
0
27.84
0.00
1847
9
S7
Norfolk
0.65
,-.0.50
Corn, Grain
113 bu.
2/15-6/30
129
0
20
lrrif¢.
109
F 43.54
0
21.77
0.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
902328 Database Version 2.0
------------------------------
Date Printed: 1 /21/03
y.
1
u'-
F y.
WUT Page 1

%7k7nc+P T T+ili-,n+inn Tnh1P
VPar 1
Tract
'
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrolten
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert-
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(1bs/A)
Amlic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
ttal/A
tons
1000 VAIS
tons
1847
9
S7
Norfolk
1 0.65
0.50
Wheat Grain
59 bet.
911-3/31 j
•132
0
0
Irria
1 53
21.09
0
10.55
,;'0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
587A:5
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
309.62
`
Balance, 1000 gallons
-277.83
Total Applied, tons
-
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons:
0-00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol — means ]eased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol • means user entered data.
W
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/27/03 WUT Page 2
A

Waste T Ttili70inn Tahh-
VP r ')..
Tract
I Field
'
Source
I.D.
I Soil Series
Total
Acre
Uw
Acres I
Crop
RYE
Applic-
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Coraw
Fer'
Nutrient
Applied
`Res.
(lbs1A)
APplic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
I N
N
I N
I lbs/A
1000
ga11A I
tons
1000 gals
tons
1947
1
S7
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-3/31
*132
0
0
Irrig.
79
31.64
0
120.22
0.00
1847
t
S7 I
Norfolk
4.10
3.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
411-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig.
133
53.13
0
201.88
0.00
1847
IA
S7
Varina
1.I0
0,93
Small Grain Oversecd
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0
18.57
0.00
1847
IA
S7
Varina
I.I0
0.93
H ;crrnu �ta s y a
5.9 Tons
3/1-9130
-2701
0
0
Irrig.
2701
107.85
0
100.30
0.00
1847
IB
S7
Varina
1.50
1.23
Wheat, Grain
49bu.
9/1-3/31
*I32
0
0
[trig.
79
31.64
0 i
38.91
0.00
1847
IB
S7
Varina
1.50
1.23
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu.
411-9115
*132
0
0
Irrig,
132
52.73
0
64.85
0.00
1847
7
S7
Vann
0.75
0.63
Wheat, Grain
49 bu.
911-3/31
*132
0
0
Irrip-
79
3I-64
0
19,93
0.00
1847
7
S7
Varina
0.75
0.63
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
31 bu-
4/1-9/15
*132
0
0
Irrig.
132
52-73
0
33.22
0.00
1847
8
S7
Norfolk
1.50
1.32
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-3131
*132
0
0
Irrig.
79
31,64
0
41.76
0.00
1847
8
S7
Norfolk
1.50
1,32
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig,
133
53.13
0
70.13
0.00
1847
9
S7
Norfolk
0.65
0.50
Wheat, Grain
59 bu_
9/1-3/31
*132
0
0
Irrig.
79
31.64
0
15.82
0.00
1847
91
S7
lNorfolk
0.65
0.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig.
133
53.13
0
26.56
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
752.15
: "a
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
309.62
Balance, 1000 gallons
-442.53
r ""
Total. Applied, tons
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
NY
0.00
Balance,.ton
-
0 00
Notes: I. In the tract column, symbol - means leased, otherwise, owned.
------------------ --- - --------- ---------------- ------------------------
902328 Database Version 2.0
2. Symbol * means user entered data.
--•------------ --------------------------
Date Printed: 1/27/03
sm
-

The Irrigation Application Factors for each held in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at;a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each held selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Atmlication Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1847
1
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
1947
IA
Varina
0.50
0.96
,1847
1 B
Varina
0.50
0.96
1947
7
Varina
0.50
0.96
1947
8
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
'1847-
9
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
----- ---------------------------------------- 1-------------------------------- I------•--------------------------------------------------------------------
902328 Database Version 2.0 - Date Printed: 01-27-2003 IAF Page l of t

LM
i be�foIlowing+Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentratiops for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen appl ication
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
pnority.nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites mustfirst be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields with
:: • high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to -surface water
movinto streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soil s containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
-1Lago6n;Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
.: RJ ';
Maximum
PA-N Rate
, lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years. Accurnulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
COMl1201bua-
150
13.16
4.19
8.37
12.56
Hay,6 ton�RYiE.f.
300
26.32
2.09
4.19
6.28
Soybean-,40 bu
160
14.04
3.93
7.85
11.78
M
---------------------••--------- •---•------............ --............... .------------- •--------------------------------------------------------------------- .---------
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-27-2003 Sludge Page I of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity,�this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
Ifavailable°storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in,the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available ste Storage Capacity
`Source Name ISwine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
z Start=Date 11/01
Plan Year Month
L
WI
180
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1 102
2 152
3 180
4 180
E
11
12
1
2
3
5
6
R
180
173
154
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
1R0
2
9
180
t„ 2
10
151
2 1 11 1 123
2 12 96
*Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end 'of'each month.
-----------------------------------------------------------------...--------------------------------------------------------- ----------------.-...------------
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-27-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited. 4k
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
,,either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
ro�properly apply the waste. If they roducer does not own adequate land to
P� P Y PPY P: 9
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within 'a reasonable proximity,
:allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method -of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
..° A" Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding Iess than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standar&393 -Filter Strips).
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking%after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject4o�flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
.--....--------------------------------------------------------------------------.--__----------------------------------------..--------------.------------
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/27/03 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
'1.1. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
:y12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
'than those owned by the landowner,
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
------------------------------------------------------------ .-------------..-----------..
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/27/03 Specification Pape 2

10
15.
Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways -that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no,runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system,
17. A.protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
.,disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.); Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
'18 `If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
-which will eliminate'the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and'
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal`waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shal[be"installedlo, mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume),, of allwaste
k.
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the"liquid level -
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
.. -------- ----- _-......-..------------
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 1/27/03 Specification Page 3

&-7
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(S)-years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
R}:
....-----------------------I---------------------------••----------------------......---------------------------------- --------------------
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: I/27/03 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1B, 7
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting:*When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbslacre N and 20-301bs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 30-40
days,after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
fertilizer -program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 8, 9
Corn: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leaching
In the Coastal Plain, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
-Review the Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10% when
planting no -till. Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool, wet soil, banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbslacre N and 20-30 lbslacre phosphorus banded as a
rFatarter and one-half the remaining N behind the planter. The rest of the N should be applied about 3040
days after emergence. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When including a starter in the
'fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus is normally broadcast at
planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status
of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn production.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------• ----
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-27-2003 Crop Note Page 1 of 4

AL
r
The following crop note applies to field(s): I
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced I' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 Ib/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
-the
in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce Nrates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to held(s): 1 A
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In4he•Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/driIl row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
r seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
" sinitial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
"'rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
,essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
---------------------------------- ------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-27-2003 Crop Note Page 2 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1B, 7
Wheat: Coastal PIain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"'rgreen ook" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your. area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N,,-should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
SPIant'sl ymples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to fieid(s): 1, 8, 9
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
InAhe Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
of 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
.optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase -the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
''no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
r hosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
,.N'should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
w; ° ;j Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 113, 7
,`Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
"Double crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
implant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your:area-and conditions.
`' Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row-foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 3.6" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be I-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential; Phosphorus and potash
"recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
.nitrogen and arc normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
'weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
-------------------------------------••-•--•-----••------•-------------------------•-------------------------------------
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-27-2003 Crop Note Page 3 of 4

Cp l
&M
The. following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 8, 9
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil, medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June aossible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 24 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for I5" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
,:and1&10:seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 I/2" and adequate depth contrbl is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N, are, sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
duringthe- growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
---------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
902328 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 01-27-2003 Crop Note Page 4 of 4

. mv,
I %now
TVF4P��—P "awn P
IR
kIN
Ir
mm;v.
MPitlL
Ma."
1A 6,N,. "i
S�l
Wf� 'Y4
LIN"
I., z4"'I
•-_ '' L lX — ", "" 4 "',:, — P. I �, : , , C, ' 'H
ya
�Mr
y
5MA
g "A- - . .1 ; --' .�
Ai .
7-7 4X" I
s.
Ik" V -
Ix
. . . . . . . . . .
EAT ASAW

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
}
6 /-9�/
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
13223 US 70 WEST
CLAYTON NC 27520
553--2141
WATER QUALITY
IDEC 2 01999
Non -Discharge Permitting
Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
334.00 hogs--hlo-f�, 3oa A S S5,40 Aoj
-5
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in'the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have.different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing -that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
334 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 634.6 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
334 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 768.2 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS---
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
Or
--------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
1847
F-9
NoB
C
100
105
20
.50
52.5
I
MAR-JUN
1847
NOB
'S0
IF-9
I
Iz
155
1132
I0
jtqv
F66
EB-MAR
Y R04aj/Or'l
8 .zS
1847
F-9
NOB
SB
28
112
0
.50
156
I
IAPR.AUG.
1847
F-8
lNoB
IC
I
1100
1105
120
11.32
1138.6
MAR-JUN
1847
F-8
NOB
W
0
1.32
174.24
/
li
155
1132
FED
T dV.
N
1847
F-8
Nob
0
147.84
JSB
I
128
1112
11.32
�APR.AUG.
1847
F-7
IVrB
IC
I
1100
1105
120
1.63
166.15
MAR-JUN
1847
F-7
0
183.16
lVrB
JW
I
155
1132
1.63
ISEP.APR.
1847
F-7
SB
33
132
0
183.16
lVrB
I
1.63
IAPR.AUG.
1847
GIA
BH
6
0
1251.1
jVrB
I
1270
1.93
IAPR.AUG.
Ji �r�gss
n cej
1847
GlB
1.23
IVrB
IC
I
1100
1105
�20
1129.15
MAR--JUN
1847
lGlB
jVrB
JW
155
1132
10
11.23
1162.36
AV.
q3
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I
SEP.APR.
IAPR. AUG.
1847 F--1 NoB
1847 F-1 NOB
IAPR.AUG.
II I 1 1
SB 33 1-32 0
I
I I
100 1105 120
W 55 132 0
Z
SB 128 1112 10
I
1
1.23 1162.36
3.8 1399
MAR-JUN
3.8 1501.6
FEB-MAR
3.8 1425.6
TOTALI-598:$2-
159�1 q5
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
B H
�D Y Pe n C e n 1,q Crr,s,,
45
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
SB
SOYBEANS
BUSHELS
4
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.4
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES I LBS AW N USED
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
23.
i-
0
g
*** BALANCE
f59 �1S
0
.2-8-98z-8,2
f s9y,9S
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations.. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 123.58 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 617.9
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you.apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 2.05-966666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 4.9432 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and-2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
I I
I
lApplication
RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
Field I
Soil Type
i Crop
I (in/hr)
l (inches)
1847
I I
i F-1. i
NoB
I
j C
I
l .40
*.50
1847
I F-1
NoB
l SB
l .40
I *.50
1847
l I
I F-1 I
NoB
I
I W
I
l .40
I *.50
1847
I i
f F-7 l
VrB
i
i C
I
l .35
1
l *.50
1
1847 '
1
F-7
VrB
I
l SB
.35
l *.50
1847 l
�
F-7 l
VrB
I
I W
I
l .35
I *.50
I
1847 l
I
F-8 l
NoB
I
l C
I
I .40
I
l *.50
I
1847 I
I
F-8 l
NoB
I
I SB
I
l .40
I *.50
1847 l
F-8 l
NoB
f
I W
1
l .40
f
I *.50
I
1847
I
F-9 I
NoB
I
l C
!
l .40
*.50
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
1
1
1
1 *.50
1 .40
-1
1847
-1
I F-9
I NOB
I SB
1847
I
I F-9
I
I .40
I *.50
I NOB
1 W
!
I
I
1 .35
I
1 *.50
1847
f G1A
I VrB
I BH
1847
1
I GIB
f
f
I
1 .35
I
1 *.50
1 VrB
C
1847
f
1 GIB
I
!
I .35
f *.50
I VrB
1 SB
1847
I G1B
I
j .35
f
1 *.50
I VrB
1 W
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
oh-,q� 4 j �G°N/A ivl ,5,dj Uexlu Yo �. lloi are ��' G�yt f� I>Ye /9,
/KJo e* r Aven e"49 6:�rps3' �s ��/tom/ oti One
1','r T rips Ile f d l doll G -1 We
e� #c
Va. A c . 2Xe �4 c res a r� I�XirnA�Qt4V
f �� y
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either -owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page; 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen -shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:SWINE STATION
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: CENTRAL CAROLINA CROP RESEARCH FARM
(Please print)
Signature: Aot Cie Z�, r Date:
Name of Manager(If different f m owner):
Signature: X 4 - Date:
Name of Person:' Preparing Plan: (P.Iease print)Chris W. Smith
V
Affiliation:MRCS Phone No. 919-989-5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 2757
Signature:,G
Date:
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:CENTRAL CROPS RESEARCH STATION
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: NC STATE UNIVERSITY
(Please print)
Signature:
Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Chris W. Smith
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-989-5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
Signature: Date:
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I,
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative:
Date:
SWCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19— to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: is

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
, 19
My commission expires
day of
Notary Public.
(SEAL)
Page: 16

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Term of Agreement:
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
Date:
to
, a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
. 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 17

L .4
17-Xr
LP e o,, a e cl
76m fJrv. :';;U'
Y
RECEIVED
WATER QUALITY SECTION
DEC 2 0 1999
NOP,Dlschargs Permitting

;jr 'i
c -41
A I

{-.En�r0. Cofvn r��aC� ,`ieS�arc�1 !`GfY/v; �•fl�DUh
Plea Cute a o Or, i�i�/ � �-'✓� r7��r/��aq n
� s 123 6 y;
1
J/ I IrD6D G'C'r L.� L I
�� �_ � ,�.��' y� %I � • �', - `J � � 'tit ^�, '-•J
J

S W I N E L A G O O N D E S x G N•
Operator: Cen e County: s;on Date:. -9s
5ta Piet,
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner): N feet
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
.sows (farrow to finish)
sows (farrow to feeder)
0o head (finishing only)
sows (farrow to wean)
_head ( wean to feeder)
_ x 1417 "lbs. _ " lbs
x 5EE lbs. = lbs
x 5 1 r1 . = 40 0 lbs
x 433 lbs. = lbs
x 30 lbs. = lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE -LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = s,oaa lbs
E. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume lbs. SSLW x-Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. 5SLW= �,oa o CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = saoo cubic feet ;—z7
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION - ✓/' ,YF� �'��� a
Volume = cubic feet

S5a e. A'Ht?c h me,7
Inside top length feet ; Inside top width feet
Top of dike at elevation feet
Freeboard feet ; Side slopes I (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation feet
Seasonal high water table elevation feet
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/ENDI SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
AREA OF BOTTOM -
LENGTH * WIDTH -
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH WIDTH * 4
(AREA OF TOP)
(AREA OF BOTTOM)
(AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] DEPTH/6
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL =
CU. FT.

" 5. •TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of"dike)
Length * Width =
-- square feet
Buildings (roof and -lot water)
Length * Width =
— _ square feet
TOTAL DA= square feet
Design temporary storage period to be
5A. Volume of waste produced
days.
Approximate daily production of manure in EF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume
= tis aoo
Lbs.
SSLW * GF of Waste/Lb./Day _ /80 days
Volume
= �Oj(
cubic
feet
WC,6)e loa4CI_

f This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.,
�iSoQ0 333 `,Ve
/31
Volume = 3 OD gallons/day 1So days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = cubic feet , 27 7 �u• �1
.5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
days excess rainfall - Z o �' _ inches
Volume = 7n in * DA 1 12 inches per foot a"� 9oX7s= 676D
Volume = 8895 cubic feet
5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
/5;2 0
Volume = 6.8 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A. io/z _ cubic feet
5B. cubic feet
5C . _ segs , cubic feet
5D. cubic feet
TOTAL �s -)z cubic feet z-) = 13�5 cy�N ds

f` b. SUMMARY
Total required volume Lo__72Z_ _ cubic feet
11
Total design volume avail.-22),6.39 cubic. feet
Min. req. treatment volume �obv cubic feet
S CC On GAry
At elev. 39v✓ feet ; Volume is__957s-0q cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is cubic feet
At elev. q- feet ; Volume is as 8 cubic feet (start pumping)
'Psi-.
.Seasonal high water table elevation 3 -5 feet tqppeej �6, by 8-I i0ed-
1 L !J �e jow 40P if dim
CIA#C I.c! !'���f~ WAS -^ down 1 ) S�fCgda.t
7. Dg@MED BY: . ► APPROVED BY:_-�eCA0 .2-1-9,s
e ws
DATE: - 2 - .� - 5� _ DATE:

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Owners name--:^ifen1'rot ),taro L& ReSfatI_EA+'l►LCounty:.. .S AS /an
Mai l Address-: )_gX21 1L.3,71) 10-o " rJA
Type of production unit-----: Sulinr
Type of waste facility ---
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a
given storage capacity. When the waste reaches the designed
level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients
in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
cbmmercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding -at greater than 5 tans per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. 'Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on the
following:
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year:
uooY J5a lbs
animals x Ao/ tons waste/animal/yr= (03.3 tons
total waste

Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen Produced Per Year:
30a X /SD y6DOU
3 animals x lbs. N/animal/year = lbs. /yr
Available N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should
plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for 180 days of
storage. Therefore, it will need to be pumped every 6
months.
Tract Field Soil Crop Yield Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month to
No. No. Type,, Per Ac. Used Apply
Total ' %
Available Nitrogen
Surplus Or Deficit
Narrative of Operation: _ ��}}
e=.. 0q ►G y,, a .+ t Cr�1 c� /0., 40 40
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District Office after you
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying
waste. 1A
!
Prepared by: -I! 12
, ,r�, S G7— 1 `%' q�
Name Title Date
Concurred in by: ♦ ��,
Producer Dat
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
1r� --------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment with minimum odor
control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached may vary due to sail conditions,flushing operations, and
the amount of fresh water added to the system.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field or damage
to crops.
The following items"are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment 8)
before land application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion} as marked by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation_39,"]L` or before fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria) .
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.4
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair'any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
S. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

111.1aIIII t fill, -. II. III IIII'.
Vcitill.11I'm ..%Imit.1 I.ur�
Swine farm Waste Management Odor Cenfrol Checklist
• :�W1111:111ur111CUoi
i1141Ps !u 11tiu11uFtl: lulu,_—^
fEr Vegetative or wonrlell Lufi�:rs;.
vIteulmillelidui Lest nlifnaf;enleil practices;
fvf llnnll jUde.11lcnl on[I caiunnn sense _
Silc ti;pcciril: I'l-acliecs
,,QFE5-aGTwK,rw FAE
KEElO U1k-e47/on! CcC-,rf
Dilly manure-cnvcrell aiirllals (UK'Dlry llnnrs CLEIYFN FLooes v/�%
• W1:1 III;IIIIIII:-1:41VL•lt:ll IIt3111's — ----fl ilnlwil flwli1 ;
fl Wi{ItrC15InL'illUl IIVL'f 51f1lIGl 11nf1rs;
Fccders at Lull cnti nl-snli+l Ilnnrs;
f��iirill{e r11 i11)IIrL' llllll+ltYl1 hun► Ilnnrs; Cte-RN FL134/2 s ���L/
fl t hull:[ Il+1nI w:ulililllnr) fnr tlryi[Ig
111irte; 1> hcllltenl utaiule renloval toy Ilusll. llil Icclull-bo,%
• l'atliill IilClolliill llL'L'11111h[{]1I11111 m scrape; C�,S 0%7�j�
hIAi A gilal inrl (11 I1:1:)'C tell (at,rlrl
pl / llllullt whin; lilliks cnu flllinl
lu'.II .III,.)':. /►� / � il,tlill kllll IItIrIIII, iV i{Sl Glvillr:
�1t{Veyill{t:t:
k'n 11 ILIA:.' 1111u1r. �/ Agliatinn of wcycl1:11 Iiii till
/ lillllirl While: l)ils art: fillilll;
1 iil .I. Innc. Al,ilali[ilt dilliil, sumo lain:
Ir lilliil, and tlrilwtlnwn
t lilhIIL: 111.11r1 111111:1 111111 � 'llallnit lfillIng wasicioville
lot 11111111,+Il Yin r. I:] IIVt:yiilC4
n 11111ICr111t[)r V[aklil;lllflll
--- — 1=an utijinleiu,nt:r:, -- -.. -- - ---RLL i/�✓ �F, -- Qe - ----
-- f�iilficicnlairilnverit:r{l ©�}�� liv��'���— n�Z� ..
�//Witslull{ivn lua tvcl:n l;rnu l:i of aninlirh; T DT/9 I—Pj5 (/%21C i4m shl-y ;�, '•.
I✓1 I'taal itr lllltivt: i; ���LL � r��D 4' .
fi�1'clal+:i t:nvlas; f
(yam }'{:ell 1l1 ivl:ry tluwi lulil r.zlcnllels In liaall:r /��N�
Cilvers
)l r7 I�lush Ian); r.nvr.Is----------------- ----------------------._
rl INIC1141 fill linl:ri rtl r11:ar llntrunl n! lanla will)
—l1nlanti-5ililtnll veil
hIl5
I• lt:rlll)nr ILrsll ivilll nn111:rI1uni ventilalinn -- — —
n FNic11[I Icclli{rl;l: lilies to ilt::11 lltillnil III, Ill[:;
ivilll anti silliuln vcrlls
f=1 Suulll )auk cnvtas---------------
Cl 11nx covers
A t•l+ If' l lov..L111u:1 1 1 . I')I)n, Paw: I

°
S""..""
8x���/o K1iobxbuw |^/
sl|oSpecific ynu/eo^
u
^ Axiwi*/Jv/ingxmymxii*/
[] r-x|c»II.Umknrcopoint (if ��*000J�mu^U/
r
^��7- �Ax�'c-
':"»v�vmu�
luU'mo) `W|^v�)
^ Ui4/k`|"io^|mi*ixC.
Coouct lagoon xumV`pnvz'ho-e,;
tvii»imoo1ux,f.147xomn/o'v^hxoxmlh(
-°��
wv Mixhomo agho|ioo xJu*l ymo|`i4|;
�
F1 Mcchuuicn| oom/ioo..
F1 biological �|xi
DO IIIyd iU |ixCmfill wim|;
`
~ v/im| .�ih '
p�' ioimmo /c"omo'ox/|r.|'qwooiuC|xxuoxu�
mo|.ixmkxx'ulu6mm|i4oNu118uC;
�
^ �� Ymoyh*"x�coxd'maC�bBmo
'. ' |
|' -�-'--------- �"�-�--
------------------
-------------------
yiui^»=|`Ac
[1 lixl, o`vco�
.
^ A»hmi"^ w|zo ux|`/yiog
[1 Basin u"f/c"mmyo[u.|i/|s;
F] |^o`,,o I`k/h`Cicx| mNi/i,c, ill- oxWallis
|
-- -�- '----- --�--�---------------
'--'--
^ wu.`:whi|: |NixK;
|LWc|-,
^ Axiwi'^`°|/u`uojklyixS
[l R,m^vc,^xW ,o|lb/^go|m|y
[7l Soil ii`jectiw oWm/v/d/^|-------
[l M`NII us�iw| momx' hoot ,|vcn'h"004://u,;
F} ,/^,",hjo|^x�..|*Nhivo.v"xNvvu
- .
[1
:.|"./a.'/j:' ." o.
SW| i"c'vy^/a`ix` within 'N |xs.-
6v/a`i.|/kyiox:
o'NjIix.s `.roXi.|vm,
-----�-----�— -''-'---------------'----'--------�--�����~-
574 7X� 6
_/^u.v,/ixu"| '^|`i/c
.
------'-
[}
|"."^..^'. k� """� '`
'�m'`� - -------'---�--------- -----�---------'----------
� ^�l�'"^"", O ��"o"|mvu°'�|vmm� --- —
r7 '
^»'" //^`'^''''///
'
O

N
st 11MI's if) Millilill-le Odor
Sill: Spedlic Pritelkes
%Y,dCl I14)IIII'l vorililt: and landscalle sisch flial xvillel, ill-aills
Mtclikilial 41ccompositi(Ill oil' amly host I L acilifics
7/ff/l//) HL
Ts lna acrxs s roiti ill a int unil II co
Lou /-5 zqL"
A1111111,111,11 JILIIIIIII.Mill!
Avalhdde Witt
`iwI",, LL.IlsW J,j.LIL-Ij;L:LIlCIII W2fill IWIC/11LIP PilcLel
1, l"Imilly FN fohilill CL-.111cl.
1'11111114 ljlllj 1',11111 I'llICIlliLli (11101. ';4IjIjL:C!j itilLi ItefflCiliCS ; FBAE' Fact Slice(
NCM1 - HAF
bWlLk. hll,llkl HIM IMIANY N1111311111 hhMilganew IS RedpIt, - lognmi Dwimmil ; NIAH 12HAH
HOT! - IIAF
.i%VllIL I'111,14LI.Ililil I lOWY kN"MC Nlifflagewral: Hitilcilkinr Fhnh - Impi"i Wcanimm ; FBAF 129-HR
NCSH - HAF
1 ,$ I; i I I I i I I I, a I I.'. I I it I. I f. 1.111 i b [,,: I I It: I I I f, Il I. i VC:i I I iCk tVI iLIJI if c T1 t: it I Ill Ll I I illl I I Shrill; I, r ; 1--'HAF lfil-fl
NCSI I - H A F
C.11111A.Lill"I Of 1,14111111. 11111 Alylicitlimn IiiIiiijimcatt ;.-FBAI- FiWL S111-cl
HUM I - HAI,
("11111-111ml, 4 11'.111 ,iwilic Ilikildings ; 1,111-11
HCS1 j - swille Vx1clisilill
hovitmkist,:nkil A:]M11.1ilt L-1 I'1411',fiLill ; klillIllill
NC I'Olk I'l-41(jilCers Assoc
Ill Il.w. hil I. i Idtif ; it I r1ml I It (Illk lite Swills t Mol. 'J'asL I'llrue
NOSI I A gi i C.omlmmiciitions
JtIi--IIL,.L I 11M.,:1 it', Ill ,% IIIIII'd f.1mull t: 011ol s islol Flivs ; IIN I 1111. 190I Coliki owc Ill ortic(lings
Flolidli Coolh-fillivL: lixictisilin
j L I

N
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Suu1;{--- -- Clnlse
111MIs Ilk C41111r111 IIISCL i
Site Specific I'raclices
Liquid Sysltrns
Fllull liftt.1s _ �— Accumnlatiun of solids
hlnsll system is designed and oheraied
stlfllclently Io remove acclantliated Solids from
goners as designed.
fi✓Itl:move bridging of accumtllalal solids ;It
discharge
_ _ ___
I.:,k;uurrs urld I'iIs _ (Tasted SaIi,IS
Mr }vlahanin lagnnns, selllhM basins raid pits where
(lest breeding is apparent to minimize the
/I/d
�}
ew
eroding of SnlidS In a depth of no more than 0 -
l3 inches aver more Ihan 301/,. of sm face.
I:, cessi� 4 Vct;cu,tivc— --- 1lcellying vegoalinll
Maintain vcgeimivc control along hunks of
t
lagoons and ud wr hnpotualmcnts to prevt:nl
1
accumulation of decaying vegetative loader
115640SAWARV
alcmg watal C11ge an Ir11pc1m1d nmrs peknelcr.
1,.:.,1,A:. - --�- l:ecllSpillat;c
.I'CC,I �';III I L7 .. ..--------� ACCLIlllllblinllS 11ff1:C41ICSialtlCS
Try SySlems
I)e,ign, n1wime --md mahimin feel! syslenls (e.g.,
honkers and tlnl1t;115) la InilllmlYe Ille
accolm1Ilalion of decaying waslage.
fl Clean Ilp Spillage on a marine basis (e.t;., 7 - In
day inicival dminn; s11l micr; 15-304L•1y interval
during wither).
fl Itednce Iticlislllre ill:c1ll1lll1a1i0lk wilhill ilrlll
around iuunealiale perimeter e11- feed slurat;e
areas I,y illsnlint; thainago away /idol site
and/or pruvialing adelluule cnnClinnlent (e.g..
covered bin lilr hre%ver's grain and sindhij high
nu,isnlre brain Ilrodncls).
fi Inspect Iilr anal remove or b1c;lk all ;11:1_unullaled
snlills in lilt-L-v Stl its arunncl ICul st„rat;e as
needl:d.
ANIW - FItO.-ClIO ,:l 11, 1'1'1G, i'at;1:

Source Cidlrse
IMPS In Confral 1115ec1s Sile Spe CHIC ICI:1utices
Animal I lolling Alcas Accumulations of animal wastes
0
Eliminate low areas tbal Irap moisture along
and fuelt wastage
fences and olher locations where %vaste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
r.1
Maintain fence rows and filter strips momid
animal holding areas In mil►imize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for am1
remove or break up accunullaled solids as
needed). ^—
fll y Halmle I hilit ling • ACCml1tlhlliOlIS of allinrll wastes
n
Remove spillage on a rouline basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Systems
day interval during stunmer; 15-30 day interval
(luring %vinter) where manure is loaded for had
applicalimt or disposal.
to
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
r
Stockpiles.
rI
Inspect liar aml remove nr break up accunluluued
wastes In filler slrlps around slockpllcs and
manure handling areas as 1lcedcd.
For moue infOrmatlon coullacl the Cool)erutive f xtension Service, I)epallmenl of iattontningy Ilox 76 13, Morlit Carolina Slate I Iniver.0y,
Italcigb, HC, 27045-1613.
ANIW. - IlnvCnlln:r 11, 1906, Pagu 2

Mortality 'Management '-,Methods
(check: which methods) are being implemented)
J Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 214 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water. r
:J Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S, 106-163.7
u Complete incineration
r! In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Q Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
�cOA L46 o.
�qai, �- . /V
f
December 18. 1996

z
O
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source O Dy Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
e-wStorage tank or . cc 45 Paflal microbial O Bottom or midlevel loading
basin surface decFauposition O "lank covers
• Mixing while filling O Basin surface mats ofsolids
• Agitation when emptying Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial 13 Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid level
surface decomposition p Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry, or
sludge spreader
outlets
Uncovered manure,
slurry, or sludge on
Field surfaces
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
• Agitation when spreading
Volatile gas emissions r
0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
O Wash residual manure from spreader after use
O Proven biological additives car oxidants
• Volatile gas emissions while O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
drying CI Soil incorporation within 48 Hours
O Spread in thin unilorni layers for rapid drying
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition Fj Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal • Carcass decomposition O Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
disposal bits O Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators Incomplete combustion N p Secondary stack burners
Standing water . Improper drainage Grade and landscape such That water drains away
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source O Dy Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
e-wStorage tank or . cc 45 Paflal microbial O Bottom or midlevel loading
basin surface decFauposition O "lank covers
• Mixing while filling O Basin surface mats ofsolids
• Agitation when emptying Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial 13 Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid level
surface decomposition p Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry, or
sludge spreader
outlets
Uncovered manure,
slurry, or sludge on
Field surfaces
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
• Agitation when spreading
Volatile gas emissions r
0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
O Wash residual manure from spreader after use
O Proven biological additives car oxidants
• Volatile gas emissions while O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
drying CI Soil incorporation within 48 Hours
O Spread in thin unilorni layers for rapid drying
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition Fj Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal • Carcass decomposition O Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
disposal bits O Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators Incomplete combustion N p Secondary stack burners
Standing water . Improper drainage Grade and landscape such That water drains away
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Ll

A
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Flush alleys • Agitation during wastewater Cl Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance lv ;O, L
Pit recharge points • Agitation of recycled lagoon Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits with
liquid while pits are filling anti-siplion vents
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank 0 Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater 0 Box covers
collection or conveyance
junction boxes f�
End of drainpipes • Agitation during wastewater O Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
at lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emissions
• Biological mixing
• Agitation
0' Proper lagoon liquid capacity
19,"Correct lagoon startup procedures
iH Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
91"'Minimum agitation when pumping
0 Mechanical aeration
0 Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation T O'" Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles . Wind drift [Minimum recommended operating pressure
f3Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
Q Pump from second -stage lagoon

- '16
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
,armstead • Swine production Vegetative or wooded buffers
dRecommended best management practices rA"
R/ Good judgment and common sense w,k,0
knimal body • Dirty manure -covered Dry floors
;urfaces animals
loor surfaces • Wet manure -covered floors ❑ Slotted floors IV O
❑ Waterers located over slotted floors /VA
Feeders at high end of solid floors
CT/Scrape manure buildup from floors
❑ Underfloor ventilation for drying% A
vfanure collection • Urine fY Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
)its • Partial microbial or scrape
LL_ decomposition ❑ Underfloor ventilation
Jentilation exhaust • Volatile Eases Fan maintenance
ans . Dust Efficient air movement
ndoor surfaces • Dust 11;r Washdown between groups of animals rm.,4� 14/0�
E� Feed additives
E,b( Feeder covers
h ,1 Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
i lj �J covers
Mush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling ❑ Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
r anti -siphon vents

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access 0 farm access road maintenance -
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information: Available From:
Swine Manure Management; .0200 Rule/I3MP Packet NCS1J, County Extension Center
Swine Production farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE fact Sheet NCSU--BAL'•
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge—I.agootf "l*reatme►it; I"'BAE 128-88 NCSU—BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush —lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88 NCSU-13AE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE* 103-83 NCSU—BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU-13AE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; [I'll 1-33 NCSU—Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program; NITC Manual N.C. Pork Producers Assoc.
Options for Managing Odor; a report from (lie Swine Odor "bask Force NCSU Agricultural Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters Accumulation of solids CD/Flush system is designed anti operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
jb-
gutters as designed
Cf Remove bridging of accumulated solids at f
discharge -
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids l Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
ol'solids to a depth of no more than b to fi inclies
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation l?"Maintain vegetative control along banks of /
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundtncia's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders • Feed spillage l7 Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and trou�lis) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
C3 Clean tip spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- it) 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)

4r.
�r
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause .13MPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed 0 Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away IMill site and/ur
providing adequate containment (e.g., covered bin
for brewer's grain and similar high tnoisture grain
products)
O Inspect for and remove or break up accuinulatcd
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding Accumulations of anitnal 0 ' Ldiminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
areas wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is mininial
O Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break tip
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure Accumulations of animal O Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
handling systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
C] Provide for adequate drainage around inantire
stockpiles
C1 Inspect for and remove or break tip accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and inantire
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina Slate University, Raleigh, NC' 27695-7613.

ReCEIVeD
?ON
.Mortality Nlanaae:nent Methods 'OEC 2 Q jqp-�
(c',eck which rne:hod(s) are ozinQ irnLte:nented)
Non -Discharge P,,,itting
Burial three eet beneath the surrac� or the around within _'= :�aurs hit"
knowledge or the death. The bu.;al_ must be at least 300 fee: from anv fllowina
strearn orpubiic body or water.
.Zi Rendering at a.rendering plant licensed under G.S. i 06-163. i
.7 Complete incineration
�? In the case of de ad oouftrJ only, piacing in a disposai pit or a size and diesigrn
approved by the Deaartme:ft of Agriculture
Anv method which in the professional opinion or to State V-1e naria7 uouid
make possibie the salvage oI var. or a dead anim--i''s ,,aJue wiihcuC
human or animal heaiCh. (w%Cten approval of z d SCaCe `'e:e;tna :an :.:L'St �e
attached)
Off raB, n.,O r��

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919- 571-4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-989-5050
SWCD 919- 989-5381
NRCS 919- 989-5381
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem. -
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location _for _all employees at the facility. The following
are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
C. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field --actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) tha4
caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates fer the fields
where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage frcm the waste pipes and sprinklers-acticn
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.

d. Renoir all leaks prior to restarting camps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Hake sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or
solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -
possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
nut in a submersible pump, and pump back to
Lagoon.
b. =f holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of
the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach anv surface waters?
b.
Approximately how much was released and for :chat
duration?
C.
Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
d.
Did the spill leave the property?
e.
Does the spill have the potential to _eaca surface
waters?
f.
Could a future rain event cause the snip tc react:
-
.
surface waters?
g.
Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off
of the property) ?
h.
How much reached surface :caters?
3: Contact
appropriate agencies.
a. Durinc normal business hours, cal_ •rout cwc
(Di rcn of ;eater Qua_'.t_; ) rac cna_ =_cam; -!tone
after hours, eme*-cenc•i number.
733-3922. Your phone call should include: ;cur
name, -ac., lit'/, telephone number, the det=.i s cr

6
the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the sericusness of the situation.
in. If spill '_eaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-989 - 5050.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Depart-ment.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-989-5380, local SWCD
office phone number 919-989-5391, and local MRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919- 989- 5381.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: o a �� C �ryr.r�'1
b . Contractors :address : LS ;Z!zb5 ,7S.A 0
G. Contractors Phone: -,
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon {MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.}
a. Name: Chris Smith
b. Phone: [phone]
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
asuaei nean. w o.mem gectaen. aca
loot 7C,96

Emergency Action Plan
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operations are leaking, overflowing, or
running off the site. You should NOT wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your property to
consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen. This
plan should be available to all employees at the facility, as accidents, leaks, and breaks can happen at any
time.
1) Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to problems are listed below:
a) Lagoon overflow:
• add soil to the berm to increase the elevation of the dam i Q ls. ��-
• pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate
• stop all additional flow to the lagoon (waterers)
• call a pumping contractor
• make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon
Note: These activities should be started when your lagoon level has exceeded the temporary storage level.
b) Runoff from waste application field:
• immediately stop waste application
• create a temporary diversion or berm to contain the waste on the field
• incorporate waste to reduce further runoff
c) Leaking from the waste distribution system:
• pipes and sprinklers:
® stop recycle (flushing system) pump
® stop irrigation pump
® close valves to eliminate further discharge
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
• flush system, houses, solids separators:
O stop recycle (flushing system) pump
® stop irrigation pump
(I make sure no siphon effect has been created
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
d) Leakage from base or sidewall of the lagoon. Often these are seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks:
• dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back
into the lagoon

• if holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals
and fill holes and compact with a clay type soil.
• other holes may be likewise temporarily plugged with clay soil.
Note: For permanent repair measures, lagoon problems require the
consultation of an individual experienced in their design and installation.
2) Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a) Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b) Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c) Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
3) Contact appropriate agencies.
a) During normal business hours, call your DWQ regional office: "19)571-4700 ; after
hours, emergency number: 1-800-858-0368. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident, the exact location of the
facility, and the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind
conditions, what corrective measures have been taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b) If the spill leaves the property or enters surface waters, call the local EMS:
989-5050.
c) Instruct EMS to contact the local Health Department: 989-5200.
d) Contact CES: 989-5380
local NRCS office: 989-5381
and your integrator:
4) Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
5) Contact contract pumping and/or irrigation equipment companies:
6S3-;-/V
5�3 zo��
��s--y���
J

6) Contact dirt moving and/or heavy equipment companies:
a) �C� S `
b)
C)
553��1 yl

N
F- 7 13 IyI�
F-� p9.F8 ,rG/B
i5 fox 6o""o
/ro-.GSR•Sd0h
YiN 8� 6PA' .73.T kb ILJp
�!Y J Z f %oli f 90X%O^1
G
I
s '��-•-_ Fii _ �
ss L•6
B F3
i32� SOD �• 6.2 ___ _
SOD
vi
zrl
F •0 �ff �7.6 45A
•�!t �s 2•A +e
�rC}1 •�'' 1 6� ,q9I
0 - ` [i�c 4 5��f • 3
G
Gam`•'
2 6 Pe^w
10
2•
0 H
y�P �g1 _ 50O
/O� j^` T
3
LEGEND
ROADS
i-I+H-f-tii
RAILROAD
r
BUILDINGS
8 DWELLINGS
•
IRRIGATION HYDRANT
r�
GRASSED
WATERWAY
GRASSED
WATERWAY M1 TILE
�^^►—�
STREAM OR DITCH
--------
DRAINAGE
TILE
TERRACE
— - —
STATION
BOUNDARY
�`—
ELECTRIC
POWER LINE
----
COUNTY
LINE
a
WOODED
AREAS
CC —
5.0
FIELD NUMBER OVER ACREAGE

ANIMAL WASTE MANA1Gc^. IM PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR ESISTING FEEDLOTS
Please 7retu= the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at
the address on the reverse side of this fora.
Name of farm (Please print): rat Ce rQA 1
Mailing Address: t A43 AS , 70 as _g
Phond'_ No . „, S
County (of farm) -
Farm location: Latitude and Long itude:;3:j*AS! L /JM°SQ'te (required) . Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identi
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): w 300 ev
Design capacity (numher of animals)
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.):
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres): s
aq: edaaaaa=ma=aaaaaaaa�a��=a=�aaa-amaoaaaaavaacaa=aaaasa.;o==aa==aa=caaaavavpaa
Technical Specialist Certification
�f As a technical specialist designated by -the North Carolina. Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the
existing animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal
waste management plan that meets the operation -and maintenance standards and
specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil
Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation
Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A INCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements and their corresponding minimum criteria have been verified
by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as
applicable: minimum separations (buffers); adequate quantity and amount of land
for waste utilization (or use of third party); access or ownership of proper
waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application
rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from
stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm.
Name of Technical Specialist Ple se Pr nt): - W t7 A ^
Affiliation (Agency _%V.R•t'•" aS0v;�c ro, -
Bob��Nr /5.s�
Address:- S� 11� t__t N y- �Z yS.�% Phone No.
Signature: COL;'- 44j, .Ah 5r //`. Dat e
aa�aa,a.aa�camaaa�aaa�a=�aaa�aoaaaaaaa�aaavaaamaamaao�aa=avnaaaaaacaaa
Owner/manager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will
require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state either directly through a man-made conveyance or through runoff from a
storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will
be filed at the, farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation
Distract.
Name of Land (Please Print)��.�;U;�1�L`�,
Signature: t- Date:_,,,
-1-
Name of Manage , it different from owner .(Please print)
Signature: Date: 11 I ! 1 ] _
Hg&A: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY: ACE#
J,t'pCr�) �QC�J qSeU. �o Air rl ff I .�j I /
/ _ A7 0 :u a dJr t/ S. C. J. /'/ca n n /h t e � 4 d + Lt/: / /ti A/ 1�c'��

Ji a i e o,i o4offn t_ Caroiina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFI9AT1ON FOR EXISTING FEEDLOTS
law. &NOW
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTIFICATION OF APPROVED ANIMAL 'BASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR
EXISTING ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS SERVING FEEDLOTS
In order to be deemed permitted by the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM), the owner of any existing animal waste management system constructed and
operational before January 1, 1994 which is designed to serve greater than or
equal to the animal populations listed below is required to submit a signed
certification form to DEM More J'anuarV _1,, 1_28. Pasture operations are
exempt from the requirement to be certified.
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1,000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid waste system
The certification must be signed by the owner of the feedlot (and manager if
different from the owner) and by any technical specialist designated by the Soil
and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0001- .0005. The
technical specialist must verify that all applicable operation and maintenance
standards and specifications can be met. Existing systems are not required to
meet design and construction standards and specifications.
2
Although the actual number of animals on the facility may vary from time to time,
the design capacity of the waste handling system should be used to determine if
a farm'is subject to the certification requirement. For example, if the waste
system for a feedlot is 'designed to handle 300 hogs but the. average population
will be 200 hogs, then the waste management system requires a certification.
This certification is required by regulations governing animal waste management
systems adopted by the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) on December 10,
1992 (Title 15A NCAC 2H .0217).
On the reverse side of this nape is the certification form which must be
submitted to DEM before January 1, 1998. Assistance in completing the form can
be obtained from one of the local agricultural agencies such as the Soil and
Water Conservation District, the USDA -Soil Conservation Service, or the N.C.
Cooperative Extension Service. The completed form should be sent to:
Department of Environment, Health and
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Planning Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535
Phone: [phone]
Form ID: ACtiEXIST0194
Natural Resources
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
Date: �k�� 1-7
P.O. Box 29535. Rdeigh, North Ccrolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 501.o recycWd/ 10% past-consurner paper

* ",. ;11 `U. , I ✓ v �/ i = 1 )Vf f _ _ zas 3954
' 'l 1Z'_ � �--� � � l� O . f ! � ��� 1/ �� fJ���I )UJ r� � \r sc • /
ap
r �
. ��' li .} 1• \ i / I l� 1 �..i'��-, �� 4 264:) ° - . �, ` Y� O d qq ;
tom!~ � l�-• � �, . �_ � � � _ . �- 3953
H
•�: `• `i ]' r8%e 1 / r y in
" �'' 1 r4`I`tiJ /� \ 1r� \.a•R� J 3/r .lr rVe? �`.J
}4� ��, rf ��• ir`� i ` \� 40• •gin � o u / i � I
Nj
. � � �,.►.��'{,���\-�..� \ , - i � �- Nil l rl 3 O � 1
nurse 1 3951
Al
Rsdi o er �._ �% :if.W AL
36
!it Pie Un "� rJ . I�/rf I .r a..�,�'
3950
IL
Lam'-u
RTo f t,: �_.jS6X Sti• /' >-_ K .141 :.. ��� , �'1�
1{AR(1fAT r i\RF-Sii� 40'
I �C ... �../ , `-�' ��. -� :� /•` I_ TR 31�HR S';RLsP's CH !'l'I()N I ]
/I�''
/
ssfi � ), 1 i � �` J _ r •.y x \ oiler
�'• `L� .7 _ ��-.` 'r ! __/ tt ! ��i_ .. Park
1948
�d Samaritan , 'V 1 .I - �,: t ,/ I / , '•!f{(-_.� V l :--- -.