Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG500619_NOV-2019-PC-0275_20190418DocuSign Envelope ID: DED03992-C641-455B-A488-E3BBB485CF3E ROY COOPER Gawcrr,ar K41CHAEL S. R.EGAN Secretary LINDA CULPEPPER Cb7{CfiOr NORTH CAROUNPA Environmental Quality Certified Mail # 7011 2000 0002 2768 9650 Return Receipt Requested April 18, 2019 James Neal Murphy -Brown LLC PO Box 856 Warsaw, NC 28398-0856 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION Tracking Number: NOV-2019-PC-0275 Permit No. NCG500619 Warsaw Feed Mill Duplin County Dear Permittee: The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted an inspection of the Warsaw Feed Mill on April 11, 2019. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with the conditions and limitations specified in NPDES WW Permit No. NCG500619. A summary of the findings and comments noted during the inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of the inspection report. The Compliance Evaluation inspection was conducted by Division of Water Resources staff from the Wilmington Regional Office. The following violation(s) were noted during the inspection: Inspection Area Description of Violation Permit Failed to report ph exceedance on multiple occasions in accordance with Permit Section E 6a. Remedial actions should have already been taken to correct this problem and prevent further occurrences in the future. The Division of Water Resources may pursue enforcement action for this and any additional violations of State law. North Caro tins.DepartmentofEnviroomeatadQuality I DiiksDnofWater Resources W>>mington Feg•3r�a-Off' w 1 127 Ca rMnai D3ive Extension I Wilmington, North Car•3,-rs23405 ° " a10-7 M-7215 DocuSign Envelope ID: DED03992-C641-455B-A488-E3BBB485CF3E If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Meilinger with the Water Quality Regional Operations Section in the Wilmington Regional Office at 910-796-7215. Sincerely, E DocuSigned by: t evti ((a S. cj, 6" E3ABA14AC7DC434... Morella Sanchez -King, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Wilmington Regional Office Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ ATTACHMENTS Cc: Upload to Laserfiche WIRO copy North Cafobna Departrnent of Environmeatsd Quaiitp I Division of Water Resources '��Q�Wilf"inglonRegonmOfhce 1 127 Card in:!Drive Extensoa I Wilra mgton, North Caroina2S405 PT 910-796-7215 DocuSign Envelope ID: DED03992-C641-455B-A488-E3BBB485CF3E United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington, D.C. 20460 OMB No. 2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 IN I 2 15 I 3 I NCG500619 111 12 I 19/04/11 I17 18 I S I 19 I G I 201 I 211111 1 1 I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I r6 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA ---------------------- Reserved ------------------- 671 70 I I 71 I I 72 I r I 73 I I 174 751 I I I I I I I80 u ty I I i Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES oermit Number) 09:40AM 19/04/11 15/12/28 Warsaw Feed Mill 2822 NC Highway 24 West Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date Warsaw NC 28398 10:15AM 19/04/11 20/07/31 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number Contacted James Neal,2822 NC Hwy 24 W Warsaw NC 28398//910-293-5528/9102933004 No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit 0 Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program 0 Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date cuSigned by:Michael J Meilinger WIRO WQ//910-796-7336/ 4/18/2019 P E�Do 44FF1 FE756408... Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date DocuSigned by: 4/2 3/2019 Morelia Sanchez -King WIRO WQ//910-796-7218/ �� EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. �—EMBAt4AC71DC434... Page# DocuSign Envelope ID: DED03992-C641-455B-A488-E3BBB485CF3E NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type (Cont.) NCG500619 I11 121 19/04/11 117 18 ICI Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) Michael Meilinger from Division of Water Resources (DWR) inspected the Boiler Blowdown section of the facility on 4/11/2019. 1 met with Katie Elmer and James Neal to tour the blowdown and discharge area. Laboratory documents were copied and taken back to be scanned into Laser fiche. Permit expires July 31, 2020. Site has a well, which supplies the 2 boilers. The water has 3 additives, a water softener, an oxygen scavenger, and a water dispersant additive. Once blown down, it has minimal recirculation back into the boiler. What discharges in about 2 - 5 gallons per minute at a constant flow into a basin for pH adjustment with Sulfuric acid. A pH probe is placed through the grating, on one of the side walls in the middle of the chamber that automatically adjusts the speed of the acid drip. The blowdown water flows through this chamber into a cooling pond where it mixes with storm water. There is a baffle wall located in the storm water/cooling pond, allowing the water to have more retention time. The effluent sample site used is also the Storm Water Outfall #2 site. On June 20, 2018 the sample at outfall @ pond was 9.74 units which exceeds the permit limit of 9 ph. On February 16, 2018 the sample at outfall @ pond was 9.19 units which exceeds the permit limit of 9 ph. On December 27, 2017 the sample at outfall @ pond was 11.2 units which exceeds the permit limit of 9 ph. On June 16, 2017 the sample at outfall @ pond was 9.92 units which exceeds the permit limit of 9 ph. Facility deemed non -compliant NOV will be sent. Page# DocuSign Envelope ID: DED03992-C641-455B-A488-E3BBB485CF3E Permit: NCG500619 Owner - Facility: Warsaw Feed Mill Inspection Date: 04/11/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ ❑ application? Is the facility as described in the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is composite sampling flow proportional? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is sample collected below all treatment units? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is proper volume collected? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the tubing clean? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ # Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Celsius)? Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ representative)? Comment: Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is all required information readily available, complete and current? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is the chain -of -custody complete? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Dates, times and location of sampling ❑ Name of individual performing the sampling ❑ Results of analysis and calibration ❑ Page# 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: DED03992-C641-455B-A488-E3BBB485CF3E Permit: NCG500619 Owner - Facility: Warsaw Feed Mill Inspection Date: 04/11/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Record Keeping Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? (If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? Comment: Yes No NA NE El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Page# 4