510005_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: i�(Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1.1 l�l Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: R&M Owner Email:
Owner Name: W + T �� S �ehen i% Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: swuhsen
cc Title: �yy'I�^ Phone:
Onsite Representative: Wh i I cJe* Sd ')
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Integrator:
Region: DO
Certification Number: �p 9
Certification Number:
Longitude:
t
iitl�i �'
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Sine
dap city Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cantle
Capacity
Pop.
dNkMil�3
3
3:49ffi�rI�UNa
]ir
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
DryCow
Farrow to Feeder
D . , Pon itry
Ca�ac
Po
Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
lReef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other, aw1w
Turkey Poults
Other
I
10ther
Sa rrurwrwrraa.m�rs�wxru
wrwcr..,ep'
.n�.�w.uwe»wwmnrrrnsssu:r:.nur�.n,r,noaw
sFsuuiurs,mia�usvu�rrrnucwsuyrn
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes (C No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

r
F Nmber: 5-1 - WO 57 jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
'® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 1 [S
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): Ig
Observed Freeboard (in): 39
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Yes
®' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[] Yes
Co No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
K71 No
❑ NA
[] NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
�g No
❑ NA
❑ NI -
maintenance or improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[]Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
[—]Yes
�g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
15a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[�j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
S No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[:]Yes
[:]No
RNA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

WFuj;ibcr: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [�JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [. NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 L Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes J�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
r$a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
r] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a�-1v h+fir has suffi cr��r�- c�in�;n_9 �'�( hOvss 'Ta- - now.
aS- Stud e fwvP Ja111117 by ct�hr�A- ;�t Q- r�'tgttitl,-bo -
S�9d L77 Vf rVf—_�,q(-f q3' 910
IIso9-6) La OC 7 PUN vie. ( f I'din1e c(Mr4 AO?� - sick ugh � Mg, &V fleO
v N-P 61 �d oe I Air ra-
a I. 3 �i3}}� Yvd�s60
S0lraol�, N�Dlq. Qkicvr rll Co���r-q 2!�
Illo\ )t W00397Y
tmo 7111 a CJK)
71a11(7 NODOSa®
4 I ($ r (7 w600 "k
Soli m 11.E urn o dt4e,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Q �(})p�jPf Phone: w_ q'` Ul y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
ir
�{k1n�s�rr�Qr�ncdeujov
Date: ( aQ i s
214/2ars

V f M 5 Uv W la
Divi-sion of Water Resources
Facility Number - Q .�'' ®Division of Soil and Water Conservation
� Other Agency
Type of Visit: (S Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:r Departure Time:County:
Farm Name: 'S J f ilo; Owner Email:
Owner Name: rvh�Pie S pllp„ s Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: S Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: 94(a
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Region:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Capacity
Fop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pomaw p.
7Design
Finish
La er
Dair Caw
Feeder
Eeeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
o Finish
ao
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
SY
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
OW
- P,o_ultr,
@a aei
P,o P.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes gi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
DNA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
21412015 Continued

Facilit •,Number: - Date of inspection:
.0, 4
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ItTT t T
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
�g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application'? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
2[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
,
12. Crop Type(s): CWMI r d Sh1/1 it 4fY11�'1 ollfjimPk
- —
13. Soil Type(s): NA 1e
14. Do the receiving crops dif er from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
&n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
❑ Yes
fo No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes FXJ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 1�fl No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? []Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
RNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Q Date of Inspection: 4
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
O Yes
[ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA 0 NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, Freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
[] Yes
CZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to Qu'estion�#):x Explain any YES $answers and/or any, additional recomTnendatipns or any ,other comments �:
Use drawings:of'facility to betters explain',situations (use;additional', �ages'ss'necessary)
..: .�
a6wh+0, wi11 4 10 hri CA^ wi' j ed- br 1a 31at19.
s, Te_ 7solat'o, la oo1 has -et, erlf+'a, U/ � a0 q,
S1 s sow`- Ia1*j0 -s[d 4.6f� _5,0�*
Sl,�
�Catib��� al6lto
SSA- h1 1 M laVff rvei . dfa�
�m )qA tyMh� e
Yva S�ci �J Sdr SaA J I, � �0-1a
�n
i �, ;al , noto, IWCe
Pe(e�1` a lQ AJMs a� pia( ` ►1�a s i"` 0 Y*Ado fd
1lasit-� 134 3a13 nisi. +► ► ,� rn;n; w1�,�i 300
(133 1v0o � �lS `` d a j S0X , e6�4 deal
I `lQS t oc+�aSs ,RI<Pdtrflrl, 1
a(� � �� � 31 �v00 ~.3a7a C
},y o VVOM03a
07 VV00 V?
gaol I"�q hr004gb-
p
Brrial k vm&+q HV11140 HAW mtlriall`�y -fir lkdfa, ofC6d bff -
W)111 7S U P 'b d& I
Reviewer/Inspector Name: -Jo&) &-AnOe ,om,schn nodenrady Phone: q12 7Qr_'Io13�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Amt I aL Q 0 7
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015

Type of Visit: 15KCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit. Z$ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:Mh) Region: R K Q
Farm Name: tApffild .&P'/ &(/12 Owner Email:
Owner Name: �h1 r r�V S>�dh�jtS Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: q 3;1,) F&r Vokf
Facility Contact: Py S�PahPnc Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: VA ifte Vepheni Certification Number: 16g39
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
lig
Desigu
C*urrent
n
X
Crent
ne Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry
City
Pop.
Cattle
C«apacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
��
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. P,oult .
Ca aci
P,o
Non-Dai
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other.
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 4 f �P� whp6�°a� 61 C91 �•�]
Nowl
❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: $
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ) ;�_Nj ISOOMk
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
[:]Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes �2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes [� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes CZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window, ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift Application Outside of Approved Area
I❑
I _
12. Crop Type(s): 0j)0j 10I 8 ffAA S J 211 0@3 D�fjC
r
13. Soil Type(s): R Sp, al _ s
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 2[ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Co No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes 2f No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
C�rNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

IF COV
' Facili Number: - jDate of Inspection: algitib
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes CR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
2�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA W NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
(53 No
[3 NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[5 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
[2 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain,any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any:other comments.
Use drawings of facility. to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary);
X.whfflf I-M need- to have Ctyrh�j+�� Q� by e end aor�-
.�
1j�solail 1z--Sri V
bden )"� �1d ar Gn ��s KH�a0q,
a 4, (2af 1 brdiia� q )aa 11 y - 5 3S jM_")0a-e+ )aje9w1;1 y���� 1 as s 1���, Cal f b27� � qvd_
y
Ar+Ps u 3 Scoo�fq�7 aol3, ©lrme),eeded, Cu4Znore 0e, TeJf n��P�
I IM I�ro woo W),
Ob I r OWC(r I�
$ IN 0011V Q'ap
s1415- w00�a�� �,dy
31.* I5 WOOS-6 1 I, `i j
m P M rdr mad,�ddi4 �v I ov Ib M-N ol b&n,4 , Cod �indaw Q IrPed� Inc (�d� Bc�obe� lo��/�,�,
'NJI Ng is u f +0
Reviewer/Inspector Name: at)(n s rlpf'?r Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: %Date: a lg
Page 3 of 3 j 1 �ScI1A2 &_ ftl►1GkA0,,9 0 V

15I MS Sian IS JV5
Division of Water�
Facility Number 1JI .J - g 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
� Other Agency
Type of Visit: aCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
A
Reason for Visit: IgRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: �l�fi,>f "�jrjK/Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1'�fh I�.0 S 1C_l�/FS Q� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: L3aa we_ )2d .
Facility Contact: S Lovhetisa, Title: nwn& Phone:
r
OnsiteRepresentative: V 1ttQI Integrator:
Certified Operator: Lh y C�� Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop,
t.:,
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
on -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Daig Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Qr. P■oultr, Ca ati P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts Nan -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharres and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ER No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[_]NA
[] NE
[:)Yes
[�5No
[DNA
[:]NE
❑ Yes
CRNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

]Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: I a -2- 'S C)_
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [:]Yes ® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 1,;R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [,2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): COPAO t 1961t11��6t_ V '.SIJ94'�r �f1I7
13. Soil Type(s): L__ _
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes (' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[SNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[5j No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Ej No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
� Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
® Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking E] Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - 5- 1 Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
CRNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
M No
[DNA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
E] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question,##); Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any'other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
�,h+�►itl�wrh."s co"65 b�► ee,dof-t�rsy���
S jt,d ie scare gb,),Ify sow- kss f $sIWA Aso Cr��ed� -,J.a f+S
4,cali braid alaa/t4
,)�laaIJr
Q Jaq jry
&IsIrY
rv0V -f* t
Wo 370�
Yvtafflaar
r' y!
1,63
�asJr'f
411of�
W� lgrr
woosao
��r��.��'
j"76 _CaIC
[blrkcoy, MVW 1-0 J slap/rs.]
Vsof SI M13 sale, sz Oy967
1 �
Ned L,P_ ao► �
ffh�t�l�, wr'll email co f wod f6rhq 444
G lUl��, O �C'pv�lcr ,fir . ��aoli57
7, %e- mow 0-Me e I ,oral 14
1I3I/N WOM I.70 - �ec��c�rec�yJ.
C ArdJ00 l 6 a6oup rl"l
RI) IhAL VPf0 CP& "
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1 M } jay Phone: qlq 7q�-oZj
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: May I ',aQ5- .
Page 3 of 3 �' OOA,3Chnek r 6? A44t1T.Q®✓ 21412014

i ype of v tsit: W Lompuance inspection v operation Keview lJ Ntructure r,vatuation V i ecnmcai Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: , o County':j' Region: RRO
Farm Name: BQ to Pik SQ W Owner Email:
Owner Name: YVh�f 1� Sit Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: q 33a 4av
t/lpf }�ov.e k�
Facility Contact: -Wh i fiev &tyhioi►5 15,_ Title: n Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
iC Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Wet Pouitry
La er
Non -La er
Dr. P.DuIt .
ILavers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turke s
Turke Poults
Other
Design
Capacity
Design
Ca aci
C►uerent
Pap.
Current
P,o
Design
Cattle Capacity
DairyCow
DairyCalf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
113eef Brood Cow
Current
Pop.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes CR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes C'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - 06or jDate of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
®' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
D NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:"� lsmvoy�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[5a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[5� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
2) No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
t,;� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[$a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ONE
❑ Yes [5� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. CR Yes ❑ No
2 Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:]No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
[DNA ❑ NE
RNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: 5 - Date of Ins ection: Ll I J()
24. Did•tht facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[�j No
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[5� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
fR No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
[] NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
f:jR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
Er No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to'question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Db,OlLneed.s & hogs crr`�u
a5, �S�ru�r exemool `� ao13, sludge.Suru�P��S ht�QO� IrSy��
ISOIQ,Gq-, Eas- nee- been wft( -Or, 1-d ycy V#
39. C��16df� 01
�crw;cy9PmJ e �s s
a 1, so i l '��-�- teal �e. S 119 10 s co to 4 q67 � [. l nae 4 y)�e.�-
aC I�ue�s`yotad , Mai nf 4, po+oi�j
aVSu)'Fvr sD�r►� yn� !/� f vr�
1'Vzk Aril
W0 '648 7 11 I3j �y I r7
WOO 178a 13 a.al
WOO 7gaI, 5130113 a-I�
YVoo 6a61 Marl13 1,(07
WOO 448q 8113 14
©n ore ��� bala�r� fray Irnpd fj �i ns�r�c�fo next -shy, field- >Nas b�21
i 7
lf) alio�Qble_ P %
�,
$,)AqI Vit was cloj4 , NdLw vs i9 4-e4j wx, Pil om, chOed . ` l ob ks 0k,
- 1-1 ,"C I- .1UUI
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �b,24 ScC_htei& - _ _ __ Phone: 9q_ )q j- 0t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: In j 116, aQ IV
Page 3 of 3 21412hI

hINJ '111014 U6
Division of Water QtTality B�'O✓�;%
Facility Number sl - oo s Division of SaiW l and ateCo r nservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit: 19 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine (9 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 Y Arrival �Time: Departure Time: 3; Q County: J-0h 1U d3 Region: PP-6
Farm Name_ as iefi21� .SDw rd(07 Owner Email: whItt.nef-
Owner Name:�'�-��y S',�p/�/[s(� Phone:
Mailing Address: y2QIa, �6MAr &'M kk
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: M &I f !X SkA pA fo, Title: jVr' '�+ Phone:
Onsite Representati
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Integrator: A 14L
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design CurrenMt Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry C►apacity Pap. Cattle
La er Dairy Cow
Design C*urrent
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design Current Dry Cow
Dt, P,oultr. Ca acI P,o , Non -Dairy
Layers Beef Stocker
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
I Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other I
Turke s
Turkcy Poults
10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes ® No
❑ Yes _jZNo
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facil' Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
RI NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?;
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[S;I'NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
CR NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
C? NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
CR NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
to NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
23 NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > t0% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
CR NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NNE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
acres determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NNE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
CR NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
S NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [—]Yes [:]No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA L NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
[] NA ® NE
❑ NA NrNE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: -
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
CONE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
[RNE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
U NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
0 No ❑ NA
CQ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
CR Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
0 NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
5? NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
® Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
[g Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
'Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments.(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawines of facility to better explain situations (use additional ogees as necessarv).
-This infrtai war due, 'hva,, ana,jn,o, catp�ar�+firec,et�r�. earlyM&Ay mornli 6�.3llolly a6o$-
ho if�d,edd. 1 a++tvi-6aernl CInudot aojgoosr�--', -1lh�b/�►�aL-hl,e,
i�jo PM c�d. he mef mie- o, the--fi,-if fo,M a -about a>PM, There, waf a 9u6rb *,11 bi4rfal
ii— ry rah u n Ut 6er of -PI Awhh'j dead sous ald e ylefs, due -�o na,11a1 nm o,,ya 1 j , p p�-f �
-Th4- wor no "+ rvA 0fi --6&7-h�t• �i*, Th?e ta,d rr��te Nor I ocaled efb tare
Vem cql ( ohd a;oL* IRO -6 Of` hofi'2 /l Oa�+Pr lYlt°aj✓ 'Fib GaOgrl� &�' J'�7�r�1 �'h� n d�
lors4y�s�reu�,.The_iaJr raks W-&tax Prydad 3h a,dSa*,zA 31s No,4.4 webrJ�
' jdfy` b ' '-i7t a 4 Ov , Z' rh f 1 P
avCal[�� v�lal hii l� nrmmina��f red�'� Sao i~fa�
Sfipam , warVA-Mm f 1 t'4, wiitlfse rvle-j so did Aiptrevi ewitme� wr''fit 'f7l e4yvn� ,a�
e . x eMaf led. h 61 a bov+*A, J a6ovf- q ao Ply
c144)c41l a1 QMaf Jed Q, 31 jai a,d.-t� ehad cad KiWery,a► Ieo(b po�i-a, 3J�.31�Y. Fo Ilo�v
chetk 41 At new bw is s k will � , y �
f b,e. �I (he d ur, -t�,�e nrarma 1 � ens ), Wijj ,Ih a j.wMeks
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature.
Page 3 of 3
".p Phone: 9f9-791- 400(Qa.
Date: J.zo[
21412011

�FaciliNumber: t5 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes � No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes Z(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or im rovement?
p
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s): —3 } ,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ,E!fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes t�]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
JZ�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
r
_
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes I/No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 71 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
[:]Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review p Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
2eason for Visit: 7 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral p Emergency O Other O Denied Access
- III - I.II�YI IIIII W
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: -_'Ke)h ar} Region:
Farm Name: 3 + 1e- 1i'C' �d Sc-�r_� 3 1po'c YVX Owner Email r� ► dnl It �) CASS
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design Current Design Current Design
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry C►apacity Pop. Cattle Capacity
Layer Dai Cow
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeiferp
!
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
OOYher
Other
Turke s
Turke Pouets
O ther
Farrow to Wean
Design Current D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P,oultr� Ca acit l;o .. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑Structure ❑Application Field ❑Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
�] NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page ! of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

Facility Number: :!Y jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
12INo ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
JeNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:_ �-
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
2f7No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ;2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ZKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 3 W
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'? ❑ Yes .1KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
L?J'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
no
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 1XNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: 5 1 - Date of Ins ection:S —
2 id the fa
p' iity� ail tkealibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. s t xe i�acility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(cs) below. 8.4C) I �;)d,(,_2 # / O7
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failurc to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes La"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2"'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'ago
❑ Yes �No
[3 Yes J2] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or. any other comments � ,"
Use drawings°of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
'o,pZ0,T"D_� 4'n La v&v\gee► l a I y
Lf
10a +
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
J ii NC4"<_n s- ►g 0 Y
Phone: 7�3k0
Date: �- I
21412011

rype of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: .01ioutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: q } ++ I p 1; 1,e J d Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
0 CO. W, A W I IF /' I I
10 A I# 1341f /
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: z t2 �t25
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design C•urrcnt
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Layer
Design
.5-5acity
C•urt'ent
Popill p.
Design C►urrent
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
]Non -Layer
Design
Current
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
a ! '
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P,nultr,
C•_a uci
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
ILayers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
mott�'
Turke s
er Turke Poultser Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters ofthe State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes g"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
E ] NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,�/� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

i
Facilitv Number: I - .S Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes P41,
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes',0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes EJ'No
[.] NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
/�/
❑ Yes FZrN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? //////�����--/
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes..,ffNo
❑ Yes ZTNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ;No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes &'N o
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes �o
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes e!fNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Ea"No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

• 1
Facil ity Numher. - Date of inspection
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes T?I'*No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes
F No ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately,
30. Did the facility fait to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes
2f�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
4 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/[nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
FNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
is ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #):,Explain any YES answers and/or anyaddltional;recommend atsons or, any other+comments . . _
Use drawings of facility,,' betfi rexplain situations(use additional pages as°necessary)
C 0, 1 tl M4- "QN - a`/O $9 P�pfri 4a0�131 i
a©� � s�.z-�q-Q � �,, 10 - ag - it �
a o� Qy
a o 1- t S, Sarr.. l�.eA
Lt
r��as-11
�►
(oo3,g-- I,y 3-a�~�
Lf
a 117q I rg 10 .6q -- r
555Y Ito 9 - a-s _V
�39f
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: 5
21412011

Type of Visit: 91 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review p Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Regiondk(:,2_
Farm Name: Owner Email:
i cj �
Owner Name: �t t` r y Sfc he wo Vj Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: t- C)�a r te—
T
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
ON
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity,
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
to Finish
La er
DairyCow
to Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
r to Finish
Dai Heifer
w to Wean
r
Design
Current
D Cow
w to Feeder
D�, P.oulh,
Ca aci
P,o .
Non -Dairy
w to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Pullets
113eef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
jj
Turke Poults
Other
Other
Dischar eg s and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
[:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ONE
21412011 Continua/
Page 1 of 3

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
2 "o
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: r
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�no
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[]Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[DNA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
JE2/No
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
;EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[ZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
P�Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[,_,�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[21�4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
IS. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[.:jl�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes/EI'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [—]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ENo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stacking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ YeseETNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes P'No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: Date of ins ection:
24. l d 6te, a ' 'ty ail to calibrate waste application q u�ipmjennt asrequiredby the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility olbox
m I c it permit concTiti'SnsleTated to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ��No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate _LCLV
SOWrvz.TaSA
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes PfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the [] Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[] Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0i
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[:]Yes
�(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments :1.. -7+�u�.
a� 4 q
Use.drawings!of facility to better explain;:situations (use additional pages as necessary)
9 alio C ac��a
a01)
5 P m
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
j Lr G to '14 o 61yY .e
JA
OwLw v pI q /) j yt'llfo f�
c%',;�- %()
Lllaa/ ) 0
V d I a-
Phone:
Date: ('9/di ).
2 r 111

f - '
Type of Visit 10 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ElDenied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: I TO County: `—' " � Region
a.a
Farm Name: ' i P �i f- SnLA 3 FM f r N Owner Email:
Owner Name: �lt-i"Le,[ .5 KP_VNSOPhone:
Mailing Address:(�]�oI� 1 M
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone N !�q Kv — /yy7 a�
�t rr . ma�y}
Onsite Representative: C1 1,�L ,� P�2A1AA �°,<< Integrator:
Certified Operator: ��� �w� �� 43� Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = 1 =As Longitude: = n = 6 0 f6
Design C►urrent Design Current
Design
Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Dai Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dai Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean Q Dry Ponitry
❑ D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Layers
❑Non-Dai
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts ❑ Non -La ers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Pullets
❑ Boars
❑Beef Brood Co
❑ Turkeys
Other ❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other ❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ;FrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

{ Y
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes /No, ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ YesfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
DIN
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
ElV Yes
�{
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
?fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit'? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
'❑ NE
Additional Commenfsandlor.Dratiings
o g - qJ 17 1�17
Pm
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Facility Number: 5 Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
PlrNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
b. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
. No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
/LJ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes
ONo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes
�f
F No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
X—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
°Comment {reIcr to`'quesd' n #) 'Explam any YESganswers andfor any recommendations;or any other comments
,use drawlr�gs of facility to4better`ez' n sEtuationg (use:additional pages as necessary)•
1l.rl
f 1/
t' p 7
Reviewer/Inspector Name r e `,� 1 Phone., ' CL
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date: 70
p 2 311 12/2 /04 Continued
age of

Division of Water Quality
jm.;Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation'
0 Other Agency
Type of Visi2711outine
mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of' isit: Arrival Time: L-LJ Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No: ...
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0= 6= td Longitude: 0 o
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population`,
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA
❑NE
❑Yes
[I No
El Yes Ffl ElNA [:1NE
❑ Yes [To ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

ti
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes )?(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
7e
Observed Freeboard (in): 410 116
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
,LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed []Yes
)Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
,FNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ElIJ Yes
,�
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
�Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes
VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[2(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'?
❑ Yes
Q<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
PO&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
id No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
C2/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
i,Comments*(f�efer to,ques666-0 Explaim,any YIaS answerslandlor any, recommendations or any other comments.
z mot N f'
,Usedrawtngs offuctlity to heftcr�explaln situattons..,(useraddthorial pages as'sneeessary
i
T
Reviewerlinspector Name f Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 1 12128104' Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ YesZNo ❑ NA ❑.NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ;2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25,
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
VfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[;�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
6No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
�(
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El[ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
ff £ al :.-!x�'[.� gi "k +�wxTdY`PJ
Adtlitiopal Comments andlor Drawings .s aY. �di...� -Ei...€-Y��x A,-
�-,30 -69
q_ 6g
(� = 1�.l'l.tOf
VJ= 1. 5
a4V�-W�
g r��
aj
9 X 55 ; 3 � 9td-
30,K �! - qa0 t6fa(UXU
0'" 0 9 CAJ&1D
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit tdRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ��S �d�Region:
Farm Name: _I_� 1 �' a ___ -_ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: ) '74Rhn iN%,33
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: 4r
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o= f = I{ Longitude: 0 0 0 6 0 N
Bannon . oa�
Design Current
Swine Opacity R' lation
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
[] Other
i
Design' Current
Wet Poulti;y Capacity Populiat
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dt:y Paultr3
Y
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ DaiU Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[� No ❑ NA
❑ NE
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes VrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [;rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 O 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) _,(
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes L/ I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes ,allo El NA [I NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ [..9 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
P'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
f
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name r Phone: 9 q_7 ,1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
1 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: :e)s Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropiate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
❑ Yes
,ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
� J/ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
2fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
7(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? sjX;6JY
❑ Yes
JZ"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26,
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes EINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
�fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
U(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
1 a6A- C C� n I (� G 0'r\
j35 Poo ey t
u ors, a,�.a,L�2.,o uM 4AAA�
'
u 12128104

4i
ivision of Water Quality . t
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency v
Type of Visit ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
4<2
Reason for Visit outine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency 0Otth�epr ❑p /Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County �t iFIJVQI V RegiontT
Farm Name: YY 'f'��Q� P 114 . 7_n to 7 F� e m r� Owner Email:
Owner Name:i%x�t�i�-! _ _ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
� •d
Integrator:
Phone No:
Certified Operator: IN��7� % f' u� pal= (u,�'�i1� & 4i 0C— Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e 0 f = is Longitude: = e 0' ❑ "
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Dischartes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity . Population','
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes LK ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
dN
❑ NA
[I NE
El Yes
V
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E No
[:]Yes
K o
[I NA
[I NE
❑ Yes
LJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

ZL
Facility Number: - -
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment �(
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? El Yes .�J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
❑ Yes )ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:Im
f�L ��
Spillway`?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes,eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) �No
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptabley Crop ;Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ `Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) (2�r,t'xS
a
13. Soil type(s) Bb hlx
i
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
ElYes
9fNo
El NA
[I NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: 0 Y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 1
1 2/2R1fiQ I ff nsefin�iad

ltz!�Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents ?IN
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
"th
low !��'c ,sIfh�
20. Doeilityfail to have a component/ f� CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropiiate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
,,PR'�astc Application Weekly Freeboa7120
aste Analysi oil Analysis �te Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
Rainfall Stocking Crop Yieldinute Inspections VMonthiy and V Rain Inspections PKweather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gadge? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
[� No
No
No
�] No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
El NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA ❑NE
El NA El NE
El NA [I NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
C/-/ S C*JAtitt� Le p5 ac u 0_ f
003 j �� �ooti � �,5 sR aooa-i.� - �sFooy a,
'71r�1 �
s+e p h e tlSO OQ 4z7'L E y
12/28/04

rl
Division of Water Quality
+ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Humbert .5�1006 J Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510005 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Johnston Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 03/29/2007 Entry Time:08:50 AM Exit Time: Q 50 6M Incident #:
Farm Name: Battlefield Sow Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Whitlev W Stephenson Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 2080 Wilson Mills Rd
Smithfield NC 27577
Physical Address:
Facility Status: M Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35°19'24" Longitude: "
SR 1008 approx. 1 mi. East of SR1192 intersection. Sign at entrance to long drive
on North side of road. Can not see facility from the
road. Address on sign 4322 Harper House Rd.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents © Other Issues
Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Whitley W Stephenson
Operator Certification Number: 16439
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector: John N Hunt
Phone: [phone]
Ext,238
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Lagoons, records, and spray fields look good this visit.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510005 Owner - Facility: Whitley W Stephenson
Inspectlon Date: 03/29/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Waste Structures
Facility Number : 510005
Reason for Visit: Routine
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon 1 JM 37.00
Lagoon ISOLAT 2 38.00
Page: 2

.L-
—±= _ " ,Division of Water Quality -
Facility NumbeIn 1� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
-- D ether Agency y_!
Type of Visit 9bompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit W Koutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: j b% Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: y_JoHWS_T a 11 Region: l2•Z
Farm Name: sl w Owner Email:
Owner Name: ,,,,,,-
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: C -%AC Tr- P am"' ' 01 -- Integrator: C.Of� �
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ o =1 = {l Longitude: ❑ ° 0 6 = «
Design Current! Des gn . C+urrent
Design Current
Swine
Capacity
Populatt'on Wet Poultr-y Capac tyS Population
C+tittle C►apacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
�:' ❑ Layer
❑ DairyCow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non La et I
I
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
0
❑ Daia Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Z 34
A( i„
Dry Poultry :. ;
El D Cow
El Farrow to Feeder
, '
❑ Layers
❑ Non-Dai
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
, A
ElNon-Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
Number of Structures:
❑ Other
❑ Other
Discharp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes )2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
P NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes [�JNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes [2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: S j -
Date of Inspection /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure/ Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: so +n! f S 4 L
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): '7
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes eEl"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ZV(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Vndoow ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
S_Q SO
12. Crop type(s) C44V Q-.p A- S G
13. Soil type(s) G I Leh
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 9No ElNA [INE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ElYes P!rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination;❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ;ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Ins ectorName if' �I..'�"�''°��ti Phone: tiI 4L4�
P AM W.�,- �i IN
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: j .r-r Date: / 1 Ct 1 ato
12128104 Continued

• 1
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 1 1
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the XQT readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes J�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improveme ?, If yes, check the appr priate box below. { ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
�a V ' 6 4 Z4 Fir �i4t t �I�EL,1!(,Y i•Y �'Z, ri I ❑ Waste App cation Weekly eboard aste Analysis ❑ Soil A a �s El Waste Transfers El Annual Certification
❑ Rai all ❑ S!5pking ❑ Cr/Yield ❑ 120 Minute/ ections ❑Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections El Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludgeFsurveyls-required by the permit? L,.rz
Y t�aLAX,,•or!
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? Y
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA '
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
;iNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
A'dditiiinalhCb'irimentsland/dr,iI rawrggs ,I
12128104

Type of Visit of compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of visit: Arrival Time. Departure 'rime: [� County: ­100-4_sra14 Region:
Farm Name: 'A��^*���� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: t,W � L_2" d £ f 3o� 7t�_ tegrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
_ Phone No: _
C: o" PrgL.'�
Operator Certification Number: 1 46,_0 i7
Back-up Certification Number: 1,4 1+9 9
Latitude: 0 0= g= Longitude: = e= i
sign CurrentDesignrrent
e pacity Popula;inn Wet Poultry r Capacity 1'opulatian
F
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑Dai Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
on-Layet
iry Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
Dry Poultry .; 1& °a
El Layers
ElGilts El Non-Laers
Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Pouets
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Farrow to Wean"
ElD Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Beef 5tocket
❑ Beef Feeder
ED Boars
10 Beef Brood Cow
Other
P
umber of Structures:
FET Other
❑ Other I
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
PKNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
0"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
;2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c..What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes
E,J No
El NA
El NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
El�J Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

71
Facility Number: SI — ]E�
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: "rA i Sz L
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z$
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental th t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes I/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes P�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes YrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
11.
Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
3 .13b S m
12.
Croptype(s) S.� 2K&!l "a-4- IJA}y 5..t3
13.
Soil type(s) g LPr.-sue r.r %G i u ��
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
JZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination i ❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA ❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
PNo
El NA El NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
-71 4—A � a!r 1) Jl�_ l_s,ti
Reviewer/ins ector Name s �% D3
p .ate ���� b ��s� r� �� . ; _. s ;� a: Phone: I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature /-k r Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: S — S, Date of Inspection",
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
Y g Y ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
.., ;,. � 1 d3 '
;20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CA MP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvemen ? If yes Fheck th appropriate box below Zr'��' ❑Yes No El NA El NE
ElWaste A ication ElWeekly eeboard —Was e Analysis El S i1�Aflalys s ❑Waste Transfers El Annual Certification
❑ RyKau ❑ sto/ng ❑ CrV/Yield ❑ 120 Minut�4ections ❑ Monthly and/ ain Inspections ❑ W�04er Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ON. ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? J / sl c j ❑ Yes ,2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El �No El NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29,
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
2"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit'? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
•
Additional Comments agWor, Drawin� s •�� t r.: � ° . r s` > t
. '*F - .av of •'"T ?,�} W. �*. v, y.;Y�� �E� w»w.nhii.k �aEi
1,n
t 6 -,e 9L"a-4 T:AtA-
/:4-m> P4fV EEP MAIZ-c-4- Me-0
12128104

Type of Visit ' Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review p lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit eRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: � Time:
FFacility Number
Not Operational O Below Threshold
Ef Permitted C3,Cerdfied © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .......................
Farm Name;�.,.�.----------••. County:........--�af`l rjs. m....................................
Owner Name: .................. Phone No:
MailingAddress:............................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Facility Contact:............................................................................. Title: ...................................
......................... Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: T� Sfg Irite tor•
�..
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:.--...� ? `�'. ` ..............
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 O44 Longitude ' 1 it
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes VfNo
Discharge originated at. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 9'N' o
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 00
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ff No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 00
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ` t—�
Freeboard (inches): 3� _
1211.2103 Continued

p'acility'Number: — Date of Inspection 1 Zg a
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes [(No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 2 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancetimprovement? ❑ Yes 11No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes EYNo
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
3S� 5b
12. Crop type C,- , qZ 44 !�: , (Z'
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes VNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 0N0
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes VNo
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [ Kes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes o
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes 4NO
Air Quality representative immediately.

facility Number: S I ,. S Date of Inspection
Reauired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 9No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Manageme t PJAn readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ja I l "� ❑ Yes 0No
23. Does record keep' g need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes ZNo
[I Waste Ap cation ❑ FrOboard ❑ Waste Angysis 9 Soil Samplio g/ Zf 3i
•7
24. Is facility not in compliance with any appIic I setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑"No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes JVNa
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes lz� No
27, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 15
No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ICJ No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes OP51No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes 9<0
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form ❑ Ra�dall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

411, raj
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2 03 Time: Z 2
Facility Number S S
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted Certified U Conditionally Certified Li Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
t
Farm Name: J M � — �.J/ r County: �! a%) 'j S `tea
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone No:
Facility Contact: 1 Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 0 .jy. cLM f—QA% r C.clAiS 9 Ai20j' CZ, Integrator: C_Z4JAfz4i
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: I w I�-7
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' ' 66 Longitude 0 6 44
DesignCurrent
Swine f'anarity pnnniatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
73$
o
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Layer I I FE]Non-Dairy
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity'
Total; SSLW
Al
i
Number of Lagoons
l:ng`Ponds l Solid Traps
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
a Yw
❑ Yes 4!1 No
❑ Yes YNo
❑ Yes 2rNo
❑ Yes j2rNo
❑ Yes ❑'No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes ��No
Structure 6
Continued

ti
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes []'No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes [:]No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
clevatian markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Anplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
c} +Pik S �,
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Reauired Records & Documents 4 a
17. Fail to have Certificate of Covera7 � General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have a!1 components of the Certified m 7 Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) Z 3 ❑ Yes No
/rL D'L mdf02
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irri0ion, �e o�'ard, wdste &alysis & soil s pTe reports) ❑ Yes (Z�No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes i f o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 3�j No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 01
1-11
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes �3 No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes P No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �,❑ No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #) �Explalirany YES,answersxand/or,any recommendations or anyot ercottiments.` -
L r K ■ a. -
Use,drawings of -facility to:better,explain°situations. {use additianalppag�s as+necessary) Field Copy El Final Notes
per,. !k +.e.� v °ry
OF '74 !
-.^ S Tr S, - sY,�_. ) i., ."7� ..�.'3�L:..et .�aa�' _!"
t^
`-' , '� N
35,t s; Arc,
r
7-7 77,
Reviewer/Inspector Name; : <
r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 i Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Odor Is_ sues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
,__,�
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
Zo
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
Rio
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
Plo
30,
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
P<o
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged frill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
'P-14
Additional Comments and/or Drawings.:,
-7) 1) '�-- aft-- CL F +4,J J? 3 F ` %S i// o'EPPLS;
05103101

Date of Visit: /Q � Time: � �'� �-�
Facility Number
Not O eratianal Below Threshold
)2fPermitted�Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Thre old:
Farm Name: J 3e M cSDd _ _ ____ County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone No:
Facility Contact: Title: f 1 Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative: C.A 1 S s4euL� a4'1c.+i jn� integrator; C� 0 V1 Ar24
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: ! �y77
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca acr P,o ulation P,oultr. Ca aci _P.o ulation Cable Ca aci P,o relation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -La er ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish-';, Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts F'
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons �.J ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ll[:] Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds !Solid Traps 1J❑ No Li uid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes -PfNo
❑ Yes �NO
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ID No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �ONo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ONO
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes XZNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): S
05103101 1 Continued

Facility Number: 51 — S Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
j_V0
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑Yes
FNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[2/No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
A!fNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
VNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
ONO
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
;3"No
tlaa ,CS IBQ t ft
12. Crop type G. Q 3So S C�-. -,3 Coo
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
o
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
[�Q0
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
P(No
Required Records & Documents Ape
-nit
17,
Fail to have Certificate of Cof74rao & General Pert readily available?
❑ Yes
Z No
19,
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)' 5 Z
6 Z-�, 40-
❑ Yes
No
N
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrig tonArlef oard, w14 analysts & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
❑ YesT0
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
,'No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
23,
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail discuss
❑ Yes
❑ Yes�o
_NNo
to review/inspection with on -site representative'?
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
❑ Yes
[o
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[:]Yes
;/No
10 yiolh it�ris;or do#icie'r�cies mere jnot;ed during this;visit: Yop ;wiil rec�iye �1q #'urth�r.
correspondence. about. this .visit.. • • • - ' • ' . . • . .. • .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
7) bQ9. `Foli -ttLA�I� �.�rnjL `Ft=.aM L_&G-aa -
► S) m A-� a sz fi � s ( S7�AY ��"� L�b I-CO+-5 � r� �.JA U _ AD �I>~u. �w ►^�" , �J j
%GAN�7>R ✓sS d A( rP A-,-R-G3PS5'. dd DCiLr C - e7 I +i
Reviewer/InspectorName d,J '70il
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: D t o
5100

1
Facility Number: " J — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the Flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
zf Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ,JNo
❑ Yes C;3"No
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes P,No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes �o
AL
p� J� A� 2 c�C111i I``r r
05103101

,. , &[ ► V Z)
L
er, Quality I
0 Divasion of Soil and Water Cpnservat_ ion i.
�`�' aa °' i � ' its� _.E 1! € t . �, �' I �•'.. �. � Q •©..• thCC A ' 1i g
r!fE is
rt
'.n i
E
f Visit ompliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
n for Visit Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency !Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 7 LS ° 1 Thne: 9•' so Printer) on: 10/26/2000
5
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
ermitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .......................
FarmName : ..................f...M.............-Sa.4�!...... M.,.......................................... County:........... -J o. ."TS'............................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: �4r1 «� Jz N �i,S'a ............................................ Integrator: QQN• .AXX-,t�.............................................
Certified Operator: ••.......••„ Operator Certification Number: t `8 e{77
Location of Farm:
r_
F1
wine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �' �� ��� Longitude �• �� �
Design Current
Swine Capacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
QlParrow to Feeder
(7-32
/ 6a
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ 4—
Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons Z ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ILI Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? [--]Yes XNo
h. If discharge is ohserved, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c• if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (II'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes �No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes P31N0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes F2No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structurc I Structure 2 / :Structure 3
Identifier: .......... ......... .K.a �,n'[-'I' a rJ
Freehoard (inches):
5100
❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure, 6
Continued on back

Q,
Facility Number: S1 — S Date of Inspection z F(iel
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observetrees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
1 l . Is there evidence of over application? ❑]ESxacessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
S�
12. Crop type P�#,fppw N S Glzo,;f
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designate in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended fora wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
Lo % 9"•B
17. Fail to have Certificate of Co ragb & General Permit readily as ra hale??
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified AAima7 Waste M nagement Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ' �0�'
bd/ t��� 7 zi
19. Does
record keeping need improveent? (ie/ irri tion, free ard, w oa1nalysis'& Soil sampleIatid/ rts�)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0;.�441piiggs of-40010eAM wire jnptea.O(wingObis;visit;•;Y;ow:001-teoiye 00 fufthtr •. .
comes oridence: albou1" this :visit. . . .
Coauneats {refer'to question'#) 'Eaiplatn anyYE$`11 aaswers and/or aay secommeadatioas or ariy�otheir coasue
1.:;...' -. .. i...,:„ES . -... y. 4°. ,., i Y^,, p
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes PNo
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes re(No
❑ Yes Qf4o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ,�No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 2f No
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes JZ[No
❑ Yes 4!J No
❑ Yes"No
❑ Yes &VNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 0"No
❑ Yes „ 0 No
❑ Yes �2rNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
F11
aW(jj4jP u/17 �E1v 4ZjWrc�,5. 4r Ort4C L -0C-A �/�! A:Es . err' JSF_ AT-
Reviewer/Ins ector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 7 Z S 1 5/fJf!

Facility Number: SI — Date of inspection ZS a
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes _9No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ;2<0
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes p'flo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 0_1�0
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes L3'I Fa
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes CJ'No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ;21�0
ona omrnents an or. rawtn
y. _ 13t .Ia
+I
S/00

Facility Number j Date of Inspection Z=Ap
Time of Inspection ; r S 24 hr. (hh:mm)
PermittedXCertified E] Conditionally Certified [] Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
FarmName: ....... -i—Ito1...........................................................................
Owner Name:.....! QS ..... .................... ..... ..... .......................
FacilityContact:..............................................................................Title:
Mailing Address:. ..................................................
County:........e,,}3�, (!J, S C5•�......
Phone No:
................. Phone No:
Onsite Representative:...C18` y i3A$u1:GG..(rJ..k�'�Sa^i. Integrator: r....................................
......... ....... ....
Certified Operator:..................................:............................................................................. Operator Certification Number:....% I( .�..................
Location of Farm:
.5!.....1..41..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
�r
Latitude 0 4 44 Longitude 0 4 46
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
:�❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
: Tottal iD
Daiq
Non-
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (Il' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Identifier: (d Svoe
Freeboard (inches): ........... Z.y �q
M................f+cf.MrOW....
........
.....
.........
..............
...........
........
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes P
❑ Yes 7w -
❑ Yes.,�No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 21'No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on bock

Facility Number: .5 1 — S Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes P4,10
❑ Yes tit iv0
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes,,ETNo
11. Is there evidence of ove�ap�pl1* don? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes2No
12. Crop type C� GCgs, �p0'. It, n
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes g/ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes j2NO
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo
16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 4`No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ONo
18. 'Does the facility fail to have all.components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ep`No
,19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes KNo
20: Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes p No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes MO
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? e
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes XNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes gNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes P410
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes wko
�orrespondeke'abo'
tignjs:or-dcficie.ncip� •wire 00(e(l• ji( irig #hIs'vjsjt! • Y:oo Xili•teegiye 06 fu t grut; this visit: • .. •
t.,o,3 s' a eCqB" -rgAS 1 I�A�G E �A 6�•v NHS �'a Q Ctk
Reviewer/Inspector Name ` ` '�i�l i; l : 3WIF': i _' ° , r �; l7(�, s 7a E� E j6
p�,- �' 5 a4, '. ;k 9i .�,,-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �, T,[,,,�� ,J . ; �,� Date: 3 0-ty

Facility Number: 51 — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes16No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes grNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes o
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes PQ'o
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or r
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes p!(No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes91,10
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes o

-fi Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
© Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
❑ Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
F 13 Other Agency Operation Review
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 hollokv-u of I)SWC review 0 Other
Facility Number � �J Dole of Inspection �( f
Tinre of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditio
n
ally Certified ❑ Registered 10 Not () erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:l��. ....LTp.�f- ..69.�.................... C'onnty:......r�.1�1�!.1✓t...,...,..........
Owner Name: Phone No: .......................................................................................
Facility Contact: .Title: Phone No:
Mailing Address: ...........................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................... .....
f)nsite Representative:....,.... ,t A).. !........... :. ?.`? ......,....,... Interralor:..,................ ............ ............................................... I.......
Certified Operator: ................................................... .............................. ......................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
.................................................................................................. ...... ...........................
Latitude • 6 I �41 Longitude • 1 0L.
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid !Waste \Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/inin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'?
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
Structure I Structure 2 Structure :3
...,�...................... ...... I:� .....................................
Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes�No
❑ Yes ZNO
❑ Yes 6 No
❑ Yes /No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XND
Structure ,
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
:f 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, El Yes QfNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? y ❑ Yes 2'No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answeredyes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [llo
8. Does any patt of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes GrNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and tninimum
liquid level elevation marking*s? ❑ Yes ❑�I to
%, aste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Prnuling El Nit ❑ Yes�No
12. Crop type ...(...5. �_ ..I V. L .1.... i.... .. -i............................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
19. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable scthack criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes 1240
///
❑ Yes/No
❑ Yes ((No
❑ Yes 70
❑ Yes XNO
.[:]Yes /VNo
,;?Iles ❑ No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes P(No
[-]Yes RNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes Qj No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? El Yes [❑ No
No.vialatiotts.or deficiencies .were nested driring aEii�:visit:. You kvilt.reeeive 'no' further
eorrespoiidepce: abotit; this visi.t.: •: • . •...•. •. '. '.: • . • :.... •: • :.... • . • . • . -..: .:.... • . • I • :: -.....
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.,
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): a..
OvR«-r-6LC oaf 14Alf Ptl,,,jO144
Reviewer/Inspector Name
C0-
0 tic�c,
rA
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ffr I66��_ (IT &=d d Date: D ANY `7 1116199

Revised January 22, 1999
,JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number S 1 - 7 Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: m ttwn 16� acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: 6, Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: Cep Operation not required to secure WA
determination t this time based on
Date of site visit: '-b Zz V exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: / r Annual farm PAN deficit. pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #:(5ard hose travelefi, 2. center -pivot system; 3, linear -move system;
stationary sprinkler system wJpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
�E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an l or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an 1 or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part H. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
L7 ���. P jt7 fcGi r D rrrr`��L rl., It, 5 it ? 4(
PART H. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
bufferlsetback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

Dliv'sl n"of Sol] and Water Conservation 13 Other Agency
ivision of Water (duality
10`Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number �— � '
Time of Inspection ZL 14 hr. (hh:riun)
Registered Certified E3 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ........
Farm Name:....ff k�... a.p... r'r}� :. ...................... ... County: Q./ tF. .............................
.............. ............... .........................
Owner Name. G�� c
...............f�.�....................................................................... Phone No:...,..!............14....... 27
Facility Contact: h .... cl........ ....... .. Phone No: ...................................................
........ Title:.............................................................
G Mailing Address: 3 Y ( CIC41n- t, s�'d�- , J.r k k.r ,� C _ 7 z
.....................................,......................./.�........................................................................................................................................ .............
//��..� .....
Onsite'Representative:...... 1.1 �:: .. � ..Cl.. �. ... ... ., g ...............................
..... ....... ...... ...... .................. Integrator: .......................
V'l
Certified Operator,.......�a : � ..' - �-.................................. Operator Certification Number,,... .....................................
Location of Farm: l JV0'D4,r /�Lr S' L—
... .......... ......................................---I---.--............................. ............................ - T
Latitude Longitude �• �' r��"
Design Currents Design
Current Desagra :; , C ent k ° `'.
urr,
;Swine Capacity Populapon Poultry� Capacity Population Cattle Capacity .Population -
rr
'
❑ Wean to Feeder
<
❑ Layer
10 Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
10 Non -Dairy
14
❑ F ow to Wean
d
iffFarrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity;
❑ Gilts
s .: Total L It
Boars
Number a LagDp �/ Holdtng Porids l_'---�_J
❑Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Feld Area
xx `
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System `
'q
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes a
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes U
❑ Yes WN
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes r
❑ Yes 1'

Facility 1%inber. a, j
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lap-oons,Noldine EQnds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ,
❑ Yes Na
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ......!..7................. �.:...........................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes FNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ YesU. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste_ Application
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .. h!ke.............................
F
❑ YesA5 No
❑ Yes No
.................................................................................................... ...'
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Na
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes VNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23..Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes
24. Were a additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes
25. re any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes No
WNo.violatians°or. deFrctencies.vvere noted,dtiring this,visit.. Yoi 'veill recei've.tio. tirth�er-.
cvrrespo6deke; about this:vWt:• :

R'
Fl ❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
,❑ DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection A
0"o
Routine 0 Cunt Taint 0 Follow-u of DW ins ection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number r
Date of Inspection U
Time of Inspection �0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
D Registered © Certified 0 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted JE3 Not operational I Date last Operated:
Farm Name:.......-tri...........N.nj. Farts t!.c.:................... [ ount�-.
................... ..................................................................................................
Owner Name: 13� , 0� �o� �vt �y e q s �,
...............:...............:......:.:......:...:............La.�P..3.............. �............:.�..,. Phone N)..q.� M ... . ..........................
Facility Contact: ........ N..?`P.N......... ........... Title-- .......... ........................... Phone No:..........................
1lailin Address: Si(!? S-4,';cl ���9 C — roJr - dkr �i+�Sr Z'7S2 y
l;....................................................:.....��........:.....:.X...:.......................................................l.............................................
OnsiteRepresentative:.........y.jj.JF6............. I^^ Gf.l.4�!!..... ... Integrator:............ tw+�tf •-!AN... ...................................
.6e-TON J� kSD!✓
Certified Operator;........................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number .........................................
Location of Farm:
................................:.............P........................................................................................................ ........ .
Latitude 0 1 44 Longitude 0• 0' 44
awme capacity roputatton
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Feder to Finish
Farrow to Wean kilo
❑ Farrow to feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts 2�t0
❑ Boars
Design Current Design , Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I airy
❑ Non -Layer JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW `
Number of Lagoons/ Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenmice/iniprovenient?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was (lie conveyance man-made?
b. If dischar�c is observed, did it reach Surface Water`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? Of yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is f ilit in e iplianc with a applie• le set ack cr' is in e ct a�th
le o ' esign/'?
7. Did e facili ail ve a ' title erator in resp nsible c arge? A1�� Q
7/25/97
❑ Yes Io
❑ Yes L9-No
❑ Yes E Na
❑ Yes jrNNo
❑ Yes �N
❑ YeNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 9-1<o
❑ Yes 93<
❑ Yes el'Io
Continued on back

f Facility Number: .t —
s
6. Is facility 'not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes pQ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes GKO
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes U o
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is.storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes L'No
Freeboard (ft): Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure ± Structure 6
.:. ...I ......................... ........................................................................................................................................................ ..........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes U<O
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the.integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes M4o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes 03"No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
efNo
Waste AVVlication
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application'?
❑ Yes
2 No
(If in excess of WMP, orrunoffentering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ........... .4? r ,I .L................ Coy- n/ ta,ttft .......
So�! :..................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
&' o
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
(<o
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
O No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
03 o
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
UW
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes [3 No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ElYes U<0
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes (INo
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes 51<o
Reviewer/Inspector Name M `fQs
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit
Date:
4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr_ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Benton Johnson
5110 Strickland Crossroads Rd.
Four Oaks, NC 27524
A4�
IDEHNR
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
July 16, 1997
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summary
Bentonville Sow Farm Facility No. 51-5
Johnson County
Dear Mr. Johnson,
On July 15, an Operation Review was conducted of Bentonville Sow Farm, facility no. 51-5. This Review,
undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.101), was one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations
during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
It was determined that no corrective actions are necessary as the result of this Review, since waste was not being
discharged to the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were
maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator. A copy of the completed review form is
enclosed for your information.
The review determined that the farm was operating in accordance with the approved animal waste management
plan. Please remember that you are required to obtain either an amendment to your existing plan or a new waste utilization
plan before any changes are made in crop type or harvest method on land included in your plan. All land used for nutrient
application from animal waste systems must be included in the waste utilization plan. The plan must be certified by either
a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For additional assistance with the plan, please contact your
local Soil and Water Conservation District Office or local Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review. Please do
not hesitate to canine at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information.
Sincerely,
ZMargare'Keefe
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Johnson Soil and Water Conservation District
Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, �1 FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N�� An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 500k recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

JUL- 14-1995 15: 2.6 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P . 02i02
Site Requires immediate Auendort•
Facility No. _ 3- -s
DIVISION OF ENVIRONN ENT'AL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERA 1-IONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: et/ , 1995
E ,,,[[, Time:
8twl mVlff4 fuW r�
Farm Name/Qwner_�q Ac aWZ 7_
Mailing Address: R 5110 s-� lr,, 1 �s c
County:
Integrator Phone: 7J'�- -V �
On'Site-Renresentadve: QT Phone: _ �_ y -j'fjj
Physical. AddresslLocation: 3 •S ,;,fps "-r o Iv TO/ a n 10&kr O. ra v� DO & c cM Yt py, p�
Type of Operation: Swine _� Poultry_ Cattle
Design Capacity:. Otto Number of.Animals on Site: .R,eeW`,� -C-.w ,, h �lk�cd Tear
• DE11ri Cerdf cation Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: eet
Circle Yes or No
• 4,`�oohsau ;o K
c�Si`f E
7Y:- ,•- s tie al Waste Lagoon have suf icienr. freeboard of I Foal + 25 year 24 hour storm event
Lf 7'it aq- 14m1.1 4g� M 2 rY, -rMq
(approximately 1 "Foot + 7 inches} or No hG Actual Freeboard: Yet. inches
Was Gray seepage observed from the lagoou(s)? Yes or N{�' Was any erosion -observed? Yes or
Is :adequate land available for spray? or No Is the cover crop adequate? Ige or No
Crop(s) being utilized: r
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? e or No
100 Feet from Wells? 5 or No
e animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
a;dmal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
;imfla- man-made de-6ces? Yes 0ON' li Yes, Please Explain.
uEt Facility maintain adequate waste aiariagenacrit records (volumes of -manure, land applied.
spray irhgated_on specific acreage with coveLLr crop)'' Yes or No_ [,j qb-,1,P1
Additional Comments: e, m2f l L9225.1 Arc $f r V14 �-R E _}L *fir m t Yr �s ax-- 4
EVros` r , S' e
at
Signat
cc: Facility Assessment Urdt
Use Attachments if Needed..
TOTS P.02

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 20, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RE EIPT RE UESTED
Benton George Johnson Massengi l
J&M Hog Farm Inc
6341 Strickland Crossroads
Four Oaks NC 27524
Farm Number: 51 - 5
Dear Benton / George Johnson / Massengill:
You are hereby notified that J&M Hog Farm Inc, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has six 60days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by. the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package --
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location \ 11
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to -complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:`��} ��' }1
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please.call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely
�r A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

r
Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
Q Routine O Coinelaint O_ Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered U Certified 0 Applied for Permit E3 Permitted JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: .............................................................................................................................. County: ........ `'.....5M.'(/....... .......................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................... I........ I.."."............ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................
Onsite Representative: ..... b.6 ....... ( /hj .... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator;.................................................................. . Operator Certification Number;.....................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 9 41 Longitude 44
M
Design ^' CurrenE, Design Current t r> Design Current ,
Svvue, , Capacity .Population Poultry�rC,apactty„PopulationCattie3 Ca nett Po ulation
Q_.�y.
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
k=
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer - ❑ Non-Dairyl I K
❑ Farrow to Wean k ,
Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
3
ElFarrow to Finish 4 Total D sign Capacity
❑ Gilts
x
Total SSLW
AM
❑Boars."�
,m
.......................
MI
Nntnber of Lagoons! Helding Ponds ® ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
y
�_ ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
r
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [OtherI.
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? O
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes &No
Wyes ❑ No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes XNO
❑ YesXNo
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes 0�'No
0Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes V No
Continued on back

Facility Number: —
S.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
�YNo
Structures (Lagoons,Iloldine Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
9 No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ...'ff��..�'+........ �Y...........................................................................................................................................
...................................
Freeboard (ft):......{....r'............................l..i.
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
VrNo
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
9No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
PINo
'(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
PNo
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
[�(No
(If in excess off WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type L .. fin.........
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
..........................................
❑ Yes
&No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[2' o
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted.which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.violationsarc deficiencies.were,noted;during this:visit.,.Y.o'U'W'Hl, &e' ive:ni &fdrther;::
c6rrespondence dtout this:visit:•
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ETf4o
❑ Yes Ef4<o
❑ Yeses 1No
❑ Yes EJ No
❑ Yes lJ No
❑ Yes 96.
❑ Yes /[�1`io
5 !N t#(4nv&r . - W)9-aif Ae6,F 95 i N F, e Los , Pe s6 ,/:5-<- e
PC r rr rQ/}d�r �jtJ tZi �I- "Z
�r,cNOP�A� 13 Yu,v s 5 7W r
wt,-� Ft tf- �.i��T P�mAEr� d vex rb ��4Ys ►9� — t2Etx.�- J�4rc
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signaturee/,KA �i,,,, _�6 U164c� Date: 3

, t> [3 Division of Soil and' Water Conservation peration Review a ate `
> ya T ti- - R 1 ! t - I 1 '! 1 .' i" - t 1 t
E lht,6 I D.Division of -Soil and Water Conservation C6ibpliance fig eetiion' ' '- ' pY. n
y i', p t ; ,•a. { -r
d I i �.
�� t vision of Water Quallty„iCompieancesInspection
tier Agency„ .Qperat 6iiAeVlew.
0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection t Z,
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted J Certified [] Conditionally Certified E3 Registered [j Not Op
erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ..7.........N. ....... F0.r.............. County ..........sj.5�!Or4O.Ij................ .......................
OwnerName .............................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:......................... ..................... Phone No:
MailingAddress: .......................................................................................................................................................
Onsite Representative:...... .�� .....M./a 1�nfga U� Integrator: ''4� , .............................
.............................................
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:...�,.�... .� . .................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 At 6 Longitude • r «
E
Design Current '', Design Current.";
Design
in .,, _ .....
'Capacity Population '.Poultry„ Ca'
- _
acity; Population, Cattle Ca acit
Wean to Feeder
,..
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer
, „
❑Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
(�
a ❑Otherjj
Farrow to Finish
it t` 'A J 1_`� �
' �„�Total Desighk,apa, t;,
,,J,ry-f•'Tw a
Gilts,
l' L C 3
i
Boars4
�t F
Total SSLW
Current
ovulation
! umber of Lagoons.. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
©, ! 1,
�';Holduig,Poiids I Soho! Traps t�`Ei'ijij❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
;""
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
VNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
;zNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/thin?
t
r
❑ Yes No
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon s stem'? If es, notify DWQ)
fa Yp 6 Y� ( Y Y Q)
�
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Q(No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
allo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
VNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: f S eft r Dn�
Freeboard(inches): ..........Z.3................ ............3a.......................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
[-]Yes
gNo
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on
back

Facility Number: s - hate of Inspection
(o 2.S 1391
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
XNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
eNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
XNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
0"No
elevation markings?
Waste Application_
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessiv Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
;Z/No
12. Crop type C—, Ic4t^j p fy YA,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)'?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
ONO
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
00
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
1;3<0
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
PING
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ZNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
XNo
21. Did the facility fail to have'a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ONO
22, Fail to notify. regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?'
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ;a<o
23. Did Rcviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes'No
0:10 violaftons:or• dgticiencies mere noted i�rtrig this:visit: Y:oir will -receive 06 further. • -
�corres oridence: a'bauf this .visit..... .
t •;i.. - _ { - - `68.. : t' 'EFE it.. I ". SY°69 E a 4 1 i M.: Eli} I 1 "E I i. ; : e 3. i i �?. } I 3 P O. it .1
Comments (referito,questior #} Expla�q;anylYES�answers and/or any, recommendations oranylotti'er comments t
Use di awin `s of facilrt 'toEbetter'exillain"situations_;{use addittonal a' es`as }lj f kl;
Aga' . _C!•:d}r&pi.,i E; r�-Ci r r.tl, E,`�tiLC ltl ds•+fr. €�'< ? l>aEtilH E3e E , }E19—q f i. S4 . e • rs i a •,-:i r e:- .<b„ .S�E�i$�P�eE r &L���l n�i aa;9 i �Ei> `i xd ��� 9. °..EtY I9 E lc - s
r4� vtMT_ rAAtPt.ES' AgAL 1LC(D%1"V-`9 L11 1-!t•d 6o DA�I,s A4Pta'Ur �o� rAk
CsArec.e P-Plum -r ra¢.- mAmc-t4 9 b f�rjD
f>` AtPr yr'r+r6 T31f�,u�vt►�,ar -rl�c ye+4t� M; VJK tC— 3 VEA?—
4i1i't �D:L ran�Pt-�. �'f ' ��-oS' a wry r94�. tyq$ coilcs Ar h�'�LLToP FARM �Pr��
G o JA ►- ao tt j t4G I -la `t C#,Q .
Reviewer/Inspector Name 7, Sm�` i CT- 1,17��..... :..:... .F , a I.;eErr.�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �J� [,, Date: Z5 g9
3/23199

Facility Number: 5 -- ,S Date cif liispection
Odor .Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below []Yes 0 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes XNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 6.•] No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ZNo
M Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 4No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes 0'�No
Itlona ommelnts'an or, s '; rau n a l F 1 �i" 'h , ; aaw
� ..hAl- i i�
--YM
3/23/99

JUL_14_1995 15:26 FROM DEM WATER DUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate A t anion -
Facility No. _ Tj �s
DIVISION OF EN IROMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Al` MAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISUATION RECORD
DATE: n , 1995
gTh,t vi ll� -row A -M Time:
Far n Name/Owner:' L& tYV 6 7 . C L ri 11y�r S
Mailing Address: _ S ►Es c r'a cis R s At c.__27 S /
Couriry: _� It 's
Integrator. _ -� u� H .;TIC&.-- - - - -- - — Phone: ';7 - sir
On Site Representative: Phone: _ Fly
Physical Address/Location: 1.5'M;ks Lf Pw TO/ oh r aaS rG. ra oq jk DOfr ^w RF1,a,
og N�H�h ri d1[S9levT hIth a/- �l�y Rd._ 1-C "Al Let,
Type of Operation: Swine _/ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: _ 7Numberof.Animals on Site: SrGEV1",
• DEM Certification Number- ACE_ - _ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Ladtude: Longitude: Elevations eet
Circle Yes or No
:.Dues rile Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient fteeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour siorrn event
� If r711ir'M'41 j ! .fin Y X"10 Le, 17
(approxirnalely l Foot + 7 inches) C_ d" or No 6--Y-6 Actual Freeboard: Fz. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or(56 tWas any erosion observed? Yes or V"Pf4lt
(
Is adequate land available for spray? e or No Is the .cover crop adequate? or No
Cmp(s) being utilized: r
Does the facility meet SCS minimuni setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?e$ or No
100 Feet from- Wells?- 0 or No
,^e ariraal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USES Elue Line Stream? Yes or&F
?• animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a LISGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or T�
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system. or orher
;irr.ila_r man-made de -Vices? Yes o fit` If Yes, Please Explain.
"..)+,r.s 01c: facility maintain adequate waste niariagGrnCrit records (volumes of-ruanure, land applied_
spray irxigared.on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No. (,,1
Additional Corrlments: _ e ._ !tiLL - L� orrt IJ91st. !�►`�
/ *cp� S�P�irinr� n�'l S"/o/F UiyS
f 'i , S 7x r �+ 4 T r
,
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Shiraie l
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTFi. P.02

R P () AlaoIfs
FoRm CROP-1
CROP YIELD RECORD
Facility Number • ��
Date
mmld
Field/Pull ID
Crap
Yield
Bales or Bushels
Bate Size
if applicable
t
Field/Pull Size
wetted acres
'Yield per Acre
Bate or Bushel/Ac
t
µ'"
1
' (3) Yield/Acre = (1) Yield divided by (2) Field/Pull Size. (3)=(1)/(2) T-14/03

....,...'�,..�.
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Whitley W Stephenson
Battlefietd Sow Farin
2050 Wilsons Mill Rd
Smithficid, NC 27577
Dear Whitley W Stephenson:
Joan E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
October 1, 2014
5ubjecr: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510005
Battlefield Sow 1"arrn
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Whitley W Stephenson, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
manas,ernent system in accordance with General Permit AWC 100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not lindled to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CA WMP) for Battlefield Sow Farm. located in Johnston Count\-, with a swine animal capacity 01'
no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Weary to Feeder: Farrow to weave 2012 Gilts:
Farrow to Fitt€sh: l"arrow to Feeder: Other:
If'this is a Farrory to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows ntay he
replaced by gilts at a rate of gilts for every 3 sows.
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS510005 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC:, YOU are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit. tine facility's CAWM:P. and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number ofanirnals authorised by this COC (,-,is provided above,) will require a nrodificatie)n tp
the CAWIMP and this COC and must he completed prior to actual increase in either waslewater flo-w or
ntlnrber of animals.
Please read this COC _and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Phase aay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitorin r conditions in this perinit. Record keeping,. fonns are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please conlinue to trse the same record keeping forins.
1636 Mast Sesnsice Cenler, RMetJh, Noah Cart ira 27699.1636
Phone, 919-807.64641 Internet: htto:flwwW.%Cenr aov7
An Equal 09KWU tr ' Atfirrra'ire Atty, Efr. lkyei - Max Ln pa;,' g sec tiKse paper

A 7,A,
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
March 18, 2014
Mr. Whitley Stephenson
2080 Wilsons Mill Rd
Smithfield NC 27577
Subject: Notice of Regulatory Requirement
NOD-2014-PC-0062
Farm No. 51-5; Permit No. AWS510005
Battlefield Sow Farm
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Stephenson,
On March 10, 2014, staff of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water Quality Regional Operations
Section, inspected a small portion of Battlefield Sow Farm in response to an anonymous complaint concerning a
mass hog burial. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection.
At the time of the inspection, a burial pit was found to be improperly sited and maintained.
Handling of domestic animal mortality is referenced in the Mortality Checklist (located in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan, which is part of your permit) and more specifically in NCGS 106-403. This requires
burial within 24 hours of mortality, a minimum distance of 300 feet from a flowing stream, and covering with
three (3) feet of soil. None of these conditions were met at the observed pit during the time of the inspection.
Corrective action includes draining water from the existing pit in a manner to exclude discharge to surface waters,
and covering the pit with three feet of soil. Any new pit will have to be located a correct distance from flowing
streams and the location will be checked by DWR during or prior to the next scheduled inspection,
Please send a letter to our office upon completion of the above. Please inform our office if there are extenuating
circumstances that preclude compliance with the permit's conditions, or if there are any ways that we may be of
assistance to help you bring this system into compliance. Failure to comply with the State's rules and correct the
noted deficiencies by April 18, 2014, may result in the assessment of civil penalties and/or the use of other
enforcement mechanisms available to the State. If you have any questions concerning this inspection or the
necessary corrective measures, you may contact Joan Schneier via email at [e-mail] or at (919)
791-4200.
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Location: 3800 Barrett Dr., Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Lotcmet: www.ncwnlq-qualily.uf'k�
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Fmployer

i�
Mr. Stephenson
March 18, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Sincerely,
ck Bolich, L.G.
Assistant Environmental Program Supervisor
Attachment: inspection Report
cc:
Christine Lawson, Animal Permitting Unit
RRO-CAFO Files

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency �-71
Facility Number: 510005 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS510006 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Complaint ._ County: Johnston Region: Raleigh -
Date of Visit: 0511012014 Entry Time: 02AOO,PM Exit Time: 03:07 PM Incident 0: 2-01400515
Farm Name: Battlefield Sow Earni Owner Email:
Owner: Whitley W Stephenson Phone: 919---934-2109
Mailing Address: 2060 Wilsons Mill Rd Smithfield NC ZZ§Z7
Physical Address: 4322 Harper House Rd Four Oaks NQ 27524
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant Integrator: Coharie Hog. Farm
Location of Farm: Latitude: 3§'12'24" Longitude: 78`18'36",
SR 1008 approx. 1 mi. East of SR1192 intersection. Sign at entrance to long drive on North side of road. Can not see facility from the
road. Address on sign 4322 Harper House Rd.
Question Areas:
W Dischrge & Stream Impacts Other Issues
Certified Operator: Whitley W Stephenson
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16439
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Whitley Stephenson Phone:
On -site representative Whitley Stephenson Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joan Schneier
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s)-
Phone:
Date:
Inspection Summary:
This inspection was due to an anonymous complaint received early Monday morning on 3/10/14 about floating hogs in dead pits at
two farms (Incident 201400516). 1 informed the owner about 12:30 PM and he met me on the first farm about 2 PM. There was a
substantial burial pit with a number of floating dead sows and piglets, due to normal mortality, per the owner. There was no apparent
runoff from the pit. The land surface was located an estimated 10 feet vertically and about 180 foot horizontally (later measured from
Google Earth) from the nearest flowing stream. The last rains were on Friday 3/7 and Saturday 3/8, per NOAA website. Regulations
call for burial within 24 hours, at a minimum distance of 300 feet from a flowing stream. I was unfamiliar with these rules so did not
review them with the owner at that time. I emailed him about this about 4:20 PM on 3111, with the inspection comments and
clarifications emailed on 3/12, and the hard copy will be mailed by post on 3/13/14. Follow-up to check on the new burial site will be
done during the normal inspection within a few weeks.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS510005 Owner - Facility: Whitley W Stephenson Facility Number: 510005
Inspection Date: 03/10/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Waste Structures
Designod Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1JM
agoon ISOLAT 2
Page: 2

Permit: AWS510005 Owner - Facility: Whitley W Stephenson Facility Number: 510005
Inspection Date: 03110/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Complaint
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (it yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional 0000
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? 0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

AMWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Goleen H. Sullins . Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
March 18, 2010
Whitley W. Stephenson
Battlefield Sow Farm
2080 Wilson Mills Rd.
Smithfield, NC 27577
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510005
Battlefield Saw Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
Dear Whitley Stephenson:,
The Division of Water Quality (Division)�received your sludge survey information on March .12%-
_ . .!,,2010., With the -survey results, you requested.an..extension,of the sludge survey requirement1or.. <-*
the Isolation -lagoon at the Battlefield. Sow.,Farm.facility. Due to the amount of treatment volume: .
available, the Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed -until 2044 for Isolation lagoon -
only.
The nextsludge survey fonthe Isolation lagoon at Battlefield- Sow, Farm facility should be.......
performed. before December 31, 2014.7hank you for your attention•to this matter. Pleasecall
me at (919) 715=6937 if you have any. questions. '.
Sincerely,
Miressa D.. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit:.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer: Protection. Section
Permit File AWS510005
A i c radii Service Cert#er. Raleiurl Noh Carolina 21699.1636
l oca*.im 2728 (:appal Blvd „ Raleigh, Nord', Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: gM-715-0588 t Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
ln6*mot 4.u,v: ncwnr[arn!!�?Itv. rn
j��a' MAR 2 2 2010_.Milli r
An �nija1 r',,nnnrlu'iitt l r Hi,,ml iv,a Action F Firdnvr-r

Schneier, Joan
From:
Bolich, Rick
Sent:
Monday, March 10, 2014 10:04 AM
To:
Schneier, Joan
Cc:
Smith, Danny
Subject:
Fwd: animal complaint
Joan;
Can you please investigate this complaint as soon as possible and photo document any evidence of improper disposal
practices? Be sure to let the farmers know that you are responding to an anonymous complaint and follow all required
bio security protocols.
rb
Sent from mobile device.
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Smith, Danny" <[e-mail]>
Date: March 10, 2014 at 9:53:54 AM EDT
To: "Bolich, Rick" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Towell, Buster" <[e-mail]>, "Schneier, Joan" <joan.schneie_r@_ncdenr.gov>,
"Bernard, Jane" <iane.bernard ncdenr. ov>
Subject: animal complaint
Hey Rick,
Today I received an anonymous telephone message complaint regarding floating hogs in dead pits at
two different facilities near Four Oaks, Johnston County
-4322 Harper House Road, Four Oaks
-2074 Joiner Bridge Road, Four Oaks
Please investigate as appropriate.
Danny
Danny Smith
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
NCDENR-Division of Water Resources
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law
and may be disclosed to third porties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.

A4
+�mwr
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder _ John E. Skvarla, HI
Governor Director Secretary
December 20, 2013,
3 2014
Whitley Stephenson
Battlefield Saw Farm
2080 Wilson Mills Rd
Smithfield, NC 27577
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510005
Battlefield Saw Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Johnston County
Dear Whitley Stephenson:
The Division of Water Resources (Division) received your sludge survey information on
December 16, 2013: With the survey results, Curtis Barwick on your behalf requested a one year
extension of the sludge survey requirement for the Sow lagoon at the Battlefield Saw Farm
facility that have higher sludge accumulation citing PED problem in the surrounding area. Due to
the reason cited above, the. Division agrees that a sludge survey is not needed until December 31,
2014.
The next sludge survey for the Sow lagoon at this facility should be performed before December
31, 2014. Please retain this letter and keep it with your farm records for reference. Thank you
for your attention to this matter.
Please call me at (9 1 9) 807-6340 if you have any questions.
Sincerely
Mli�ress D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Branch
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Permit File AWS510005
Curtis Barwick, 103 Country Club Cir., Clinton, NC 28328
1636 Maii Service Centel, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: 91 M07-6496
Internet: www.ncwatergualitv.ora
An Equal OpponuNy 1 Affirmative Action Employer .

.& W 4; 510 6 0 S
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Coharle Hog Farm
Friday, August 1, 2003
Producer: Whitley Stephenson _
Farm Name: Battlefield Farm
ii
Telephone # :
Type of Operation :
2080 Wilson Mills Rd
Smithfietd,NC 27577
[phone]
Farrow to Weaniing Swine
Number of Animals: 2012 sows design capacity
Application Method: Irrigation
d
APR 2 - 2009
DEU PAi.EISFI 12LGiC:','ti. OFFICE
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where
waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly
encouraged so that ail plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be
grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
contents of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and avaialable water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre -cautions, waste may
be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on
saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To
maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more
than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems. This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this is
the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to inject the waste
in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for injecting waste and irrigating
waste are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report
from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for ananlysis. This waste
utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
Page 1 of 9

AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
.2012 sows X 6.1 tons waste/sows/year = 12273.2 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2012 sows X 5.4 Ibs PAN/sowslyear = 10864.8 PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type and suface application.
TABLE 1 : ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE $CLASS- CROP YIELD LBS AW COMM ACRES LBS AW APPLIC.
DETERMINING PHASE CODE NIACRE NIACRE USED TIME
8549
1
BLANTON 0-5%
BH
7
350
0
20.32
7112
MAR-OCT
8549
1
BLANTON 0-5%
SG
1
50
0
20.32
1016
SEP-MAY
8549
4
GILEAD 6-10%
BH
7
350
0
10.78
3773
MAR-OCT
8549
4
GILEAD 6-10%
SG
1
50
0
10.78
539
SEP-MAY
TOTALS: 12440
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of NC to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
Page 2 of 9

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land. See required specifications 2.)
There are no Acres Leased
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow
summer annuals.
* Indicates a Crop Rotation
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in field due to overseeding.
**Lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen less any commercial
nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in TABLES 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE CROP UNITS LBS NIUNIT
BH
HYBRID BERM U DAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
50
r
Page 3 of 9

TOTALS FROM TABLES 9 AND 2
ACRES LBS AW
N USED
TABLE 1 1 31.11 12,440
TOTALS: 31.1 12,440
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED: 10,065
*** BALANCE -1,575
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully utilize the animal waste N
produced.
Acres show in each of the preceeding tables are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter
areas not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the
fields listed may, and mast likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nurturient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility
will produce approximately 1770.56 pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the
sludge that will need to be removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when
broadcasting the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well special
equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.
See the attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of
irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture
content, soil structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of
irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the
crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 5.92 months. In no instance should the volume of
waste being stored in your structure be within 1.6 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsiblity of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
APPLICATION APPLICATION
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP RATE (Inlhr) AMT (Inches)
8549
-4
GILEAD 6-10%
SG
0.35
'1
8549
4
GILEAD 6-10%
BH
0.35
'1
8549
-1
BLANTON 0-5%
SG
0.75
"1
8549
BLANTON 0-5%
BH
0.75
`1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount of
nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Page 4 of 9

NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
This plan is based on the previous plan for this farm dated 11-10-98. Yields are based on
actual production history. Producer must maintain records for 5 years and must produce
these yields, on average, for 3 out of 5 years. Farm is under same management, but different
ownership.
Page 5 of 9

PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Water Quality for every
day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy
of a written agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste
Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. (See FOTG
Stantard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the NRCS Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
*7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9k. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop on bare soil.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
the outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from anv residential prooertv boundary
Page 6 of 9

and from any perennial stream or river (other that an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995), shall not be applied
closer than 25 feet to perennial waters. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells
13. Animal Waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landownwer.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right - of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted croplands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the application causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
*16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
*17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage or discharge.
*18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
*19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied as a preemergence with no other applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
*21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark
the maximum storage volume fpr waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted
for optimum crop production amd maintained. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Page 7 of 9

23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina Department of
Agriculture regulations.
* Liquid Systems
Page 8of9

NAME OF FARM: Battlefield Farm
OWNER I MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance precedures estalished in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and/or storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new utilization
plan and a new certification to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have acces to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must
be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FA4J OWNPR: A Whitley Stephenson
SIGNATURE: L/1 DATE:_ 11 1 L6)
NAME OF MANAGER (i different from owner):
please print
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: Curtis Barwick
AFFILIATION: Coharie Hog Farm
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 300 Westover Rd.
Clinton, NC 28328
{91 592 122 r/
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
Page 9 of 9

FARM WHO
BSF004
5/26/2008
5/25/2008
W06433 3/26/2008 2.4
1 /26/2008
Irrigation
5/7/2008
W04170 3/8/2008 2.6
1 /812008
Irrigation 1/7/2008
12/30/2007
12/29/2007
W02929 10/30/2007 1.7
8/31 /2007
Irrigation
11/4/2007
W01624 9/5/2007 2.4
7/7/2007
9/14/2007
W00347 7/16/2007 2.8
5/17/2007

1
COHARIE FARMS SLUDGE SURVEY EXEMPTIONS APPROVAL
September
6, 2007
COUNTY
REGIONAL
OFFICE
FARM NO.
FARM NAME
LAGOON ID
EXTENSION
APPROVAL TO 2009
1
Johnston
Raleigh
51-0110
Craig Farm
4
Yes
2
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0330
Russell Parker
1
Yes
3
Duplin
Wilmington
31-0572
Southerland Farms #1
1
Yes
4
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0487
C & C Sow Farms
1
Yes
5
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0356
Savannah Hill Farms
1
Yes
6
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0622
K & T Nursery
1
Yes
R, 51
1wz0005
51-0005
Battlefield $QIN arm
Battlefield Sow Farm
Sow
Isolation
Y-s
Yes
8
Johnston
Raleigh
9
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0354
Triple H Sow Farm
1
Yes
10
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0166
Mike Hope Sow Farm
1
Yes
11
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0502
Coharies Farm C-2
1
Yes
12
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0325
Coharies Farm C-3
1
Yes
13
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0363
Coharies Farm C-6
1
Yes
14
Johnston
Raleigh
51-0111
Coharies Farm C-8
1
Yes
15
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0081
Coharies Farm C-12
1
Yes
16
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0494
Coharies Farm New
Nursery
1
NO
17
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0494 1
Coharies Farm New
Nursery
2
Yes
10/30/2007 dgl

1.
yRe: SIUDGE SURVEY TESTING DATES EXTENSIONS
Subject: Re: SLUDGE SURVEY TESTING DATES EXTENSIONS
From: Dennis Lund <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:04:18 -0400
To: Jane Bernard <[e-mail]>
Jane Bernard wrote:
Dennis,
The attachment for the extensions was not included in the e-mail I received.
I had asked Curtis to look into the old extensions for the farmers that have
just received the 2007 COC.
Some of the Farmers have already received new letters. Just let me know if we
are going to get letters for files, if not please send me the attachment.
Thanks
Jane
Curtis Barwick wrote:
Dennis,
Jane Bernard with DWQ (RRO) said that you would need to send a letter to
each of these operations regarding their exemption to make them official.
She said an email would not be accepted. When we got some exemptions in
2004, Keith Larick sent letters to each farm. Sorry for the extra work but
want to make sure everyone understands the exemptions are valid.
Thanks for your help, Curtis.
I
-----Original Message -----
From: Dennis Lund [ mailto:dennis. lund@ncmail. net I Sent: Thursday, September
06, 2007 9:29 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Todd Bennett
Subject: SLUDGE SURVEY TESTING DATES EXTENSIONS
On August 27, 2007, we received your sludge surveys and request that the
sludge surveys for the numerous lagoons not be required until 2009. Attached
is a summary of the approved extensions. The results of the 2009 sludge
surveys are to be submitted by March 1, 2010. Only one lagoon was not
approved. Coharies Farms New Nursery (Farm No. 82-0494), Lagoon #1 is not
approved for an extension. The treatment depth is marginal and encroaching
on the 4 foot requirement.
EXTENSION APPROVAL.xIs Content -Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
Content -Encoding: base64
I of 1 10/30/2007 2:18 PM

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H, Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
November 14, 2007 1
I'd
N4V 2
Curtis Barwick
Coharie Farms
300 Westover Road
Clinton, North Carolina 28328
Subject: Sludge Survey Testing Dates
Coharie Foods, Inc.
Animal Waste Management System
Dear Mr. Barwick:
The Division of Water Quality (Division) received your sludge surveys information on August 27, 2007.
With your results, you requested that the numerous lagoons be exempt from fiuther sludge surveys for the
life of the current permits. Due to the amounts of treatment volume available, the Division concludes that
sludge surveys are not needed until 2009. Attached is a summary table (Coharie Farms Sludge Survey
Exemptions Approval) of the approved extensions. This is the same summary e-mailed to you on
September 6, 2007. Only one lagoon was not approved. Coharies Farm New Nursery (Farm No. 82-
0494), Lagoon #1 is not approved for an extension. The treatment depth is marginal and encroaching on
the 4 foot requirement.
For those lagoons granted an extension to 2009, the results of the 2009 sludge surveys are to be submitted
by March 1, 2010.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Dennis G. Lund
Environmental Engineer
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Central Files
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwatcmualitv.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal OpportunitylAffirrnative Action Employer— 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: (919) 71 "588
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

COHARIE FARMS SLUDGE SURVEY EXEMPTIONS APPROVAL
September 6, 2007
COUNTY
REGIONAL
OFFICE
FARM NO.
FARM NAME
LAGOON ID
EXTENSION
APPROVAL TO 2009
1
Johnston
Raleigh
51-0110
CraigFarm
4
Yes
2
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0330
Russell Parker
1
Yes
3
Duplin
Wilmington
31-0572
Southerland Farms #1
1
Yes
4
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0487
C & C�Sow Farms
1
Yes
5
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0356
Savannah Hill Farms
1
Yes
6
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0622
K & T Nursery
1
Yes
7
Johnston
Raleigh
Battlefield Sow Farm
Sow
Yes
8
Johnston
Raleigh
Battlefield Sow Farm
Isolation
Yes
9
Sampson
Fayetteville
132-0354
Triple H Sow Farm
1
Yes
10
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0166
Mike Hope Sow Farm
1
Yes
11
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0502
Coharies Farm C-2
1
Yes
12
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0325
Coharies Farm C-3
1
Yes
13
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0363
Coharies Farm C-6
1
Yes
14
Johnston
Raleigh
51-0111
Coharies Farm C-8
1
Yes
15
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0081
Coharies Farm C-12
1
Yes
16
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0494
Coharies Farm New
Nursery
1
NO
17
Sampson
Fayetteville
82-0494
Coharies Farm New
Nursery
2
Yes
11/14/2007 dgI

L
OF WATER
Michael F. Easley, Governor
111Q
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gy
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
Whitley Stephenson
Battlefield Sow Farm
2080 Wilson Mills Rd
Smithfield NC 27577
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510005
Battlefield Sow Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Whitley Stephenson:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on March 6, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Whitley
Stephenson, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS510005 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Battlefield Sow Farm, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of
no greater than an annual average of 2012 Farrow to Wean swine and the application to land as specified
in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keepjna
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NofthCarolina
Phone: [phone] I FAX: [phone] / Intemet h2o.enr.state.nc.us Vat�r�!!�
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

PPV 7
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is inade within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510005
APS Central Files

O� W A rZ;9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q William" : Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environmen as
j r Alan Direamr
cam_
February 6, 2004 ' $
Y
Whitley Stephenson lr. t-
Battlefield Sow Farm
2080 Wilson Mills Road
. i L ' • --=..! ski +,�-
Smithfield, NC 27577
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510005
Battlefield Sow Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Whitley Stephenson:
In accordance with your request for a change in operation type received on February 4, 2004, we are
hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Whitley Stephenson, authorizing
the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in
accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Battlefield Sow Farm located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 2012 Farrow to Wean and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to
Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may
be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4
gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS510005 dated September 5, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number'
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells any
laizoon or any wetted area of a soray field.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
on the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
IZA
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG 100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510005
NDPU Files

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
September 5, 2003
Whitley Stephenson � I
Battlefield Sow Farm
2080 Wilson Mills Road �Q
Smithfield, NC 27577
S� g
Dear Whitley Stephenson:
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality,,,
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510005
Battlefield Sow Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
In accordance with your Notification of Change of Ownership received on July 14, 2003, we are hereby
forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Whitley Stephensok authorizing the
operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land apM
system in
accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the managem nt
of animal waste from the Battlefield Sow Farm (previously called the J & M Hog Farm) located/in
Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no greater than an annual average of 16M Farrow to
Feeder Sows and 240 gilts and the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation; there may also
be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent
number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS510005 dated May 1, 2003 issued to the former owners of the J &
M Hog Farm, Benton / George Johnson I Massengill. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and
required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the
General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and
maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility.
Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of
animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this
COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee. from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
mom
Internet hftp://h2o.enr,state,nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filedatleast 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership!
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this CO a unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone] ext. 370.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWGI00000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
George R. Massengill, Vice President, J & M Hog farm, Inc.
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510005
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Benton I George Johnson / Massengill
J&M Hog Farm Inc
6341 Strickland Crossroads
Four Oaks NC 27524
0&1 4 0 • 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLfNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND tNATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
l o r�
R J
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number'5.1-5=�,
Johnston; County,
Dear Benton / George Johnson / Massengill:
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this Ietter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere] ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT_ REQUESTED
Benton / George Johnson / Massengill
6341 Strickland Crossroads
Four Oaks NC 27524
Dear Benton / George Johnson I Massengill:
M; lk
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNAI, ARTMEOF
ENVIRONMENT AND tV L�AC�R : NT URCES
September 30, 1999 s n
Ile
Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment
J&� 'M-Hog Fai=iri Iric'b
Permit Number: A W$510005�
Johnston•County__,,,.,,
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1OG, all animal operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 7/20/98.
Your annual permit fee for the period of 7/20/99 - 7/19/2000 is $300.00. Your payment was due 9/4/99. Because
this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit, pursuant
to 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at [phone] ext. 210.
Sincer
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Raleigh Regional Office
Johnston County Health Department
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 22, 1998
Benton / George Johnson / Massengill
- 6341 Strickland Crossroads
Four Oaks NC 27524
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment
J&M Hog Farm Inc
Permit Number: AWS510005
Johnston County
Dear Benton / George Johnson / Massengill:
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.10G, all animal operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 7/20/98.
Your annual permit fee for the period of 7/20/98 - 7/19/99 is $200,00. Your payment was due 9/5/98. Because
this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit,
pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at [phone] ext. 210.
cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit
CRale gliK egioiial Office --
Johnston County Health -Department
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
e!'ety,
�fli 4t s J A._Preston-Howard, k.rP,eE
5�
BIZ fiALEIG� ��Ulv�iAl QFF ICE I
pF}-ti4
ter'
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Benton Johnson & George Massengill
J&M Hog Farm Inc
6341 Strickland Crossroads
Four Oaks NC 27524
Dear Benton Johnson & George Massengill:
A
LT"
••
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT/A�_NATURAL RESOURCES
I D- 1k; I I 11 �1'
July 20, 1998
1/4
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510005
J&M Hog Farm Inc
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
In accordance with your application received on May 21, 1998, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Benton Johnson and George Massengill, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the J&M Hog Farm Inc, located in Johnston
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 1600 Farrow to Feeder
and 240 Gilts and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by .
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms. and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 2762"535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ i0% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS510005
J&M Hog Farm Inc
Page 2,
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Katharine Keaton at [phone] ext. 533.'
Sincerely
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Johnston County Health Department
_Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

t,.
1
1+ REC,r iVED
? State of North Carolina �41i�TERQIIAL'iYSECTION
Department of Environment and Natural ResourcKY 2 1 1998
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form Ikon -Discharge Permitting
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN,ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: J&M Hog Farm Inc
1.2 Print Land Ownces name: Benton / George Johnson / Massengill
1.3 Mailing address: 6341 Strickland Crossroads
Vy, State: Four Oaks NC _ Zip: 27524
Telephone Number (include area code): 919-894-461 1
1.4 County where facility is located: Johnston
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Go to Cherry Hospital and take the Stevens Mill Rd.
Go approx 15 miles and the farm sign will be located on the right. Rurn onto the dirt path at the sign and go I mile to
farm.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/87
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 51 (county number); 5 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descr_ip iontfont Swine operation
�w to Feeder
Gilts
1840- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er 'or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
o Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/26/98
Page 1 of 4

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): ^ 46.1 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP):
28.24
2.4 Ate subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields?
2.5 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)?
YES
YES
or (please circle one)
or N (please circle one)
1.6 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
E& or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? C) d t 1 %
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? 1 D,
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item:
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3:2 =Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3
Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). if the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
.The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 'The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 , The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application Field.
3:3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3:3:13,Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3:3 14- Moifality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.)
If your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, such as an irrigation design,
or site evaluation, please include the additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 2 of 4

Facility Number: 51 - 5
Facility Name: 7&M Hog Farm Inc
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
1, _L3�i �• �'o1.v.s�• I— G r.o !j?St M Prs3e_1A d 1 (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for S'--)r11A kA M FPrwrA =vLr, - (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by mean is accuraatte and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will b re e o Las incomple
Signature Date
5. MANAGE CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewe�5y—me and is accurate anTcomp ete to the best of my knowledge. I un erstand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO TIME FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 3 of 4

r` ,i.'. �� '•r - i .� el' '+4t,�� ..fir ,.`�
' j •. 4 � : `'SI'� i .. x... - y ' � ..y:.^I i, �+ 1 ."1 ,1 �'-.i��#I
r4'r=., � '(•� Wt.�.,'].Li-�.4,' .t•»... .ate ..l � 7 r r Ir t♦ '1
�'.� �' t x r. • r � _ ,Ar �, I, f 7 ': I i r f ! i ,' 1 } � yir'1 �� 1 � y��'y'1
r!- •`e f, ` .roe...:. J r ''! � r• � f st - �i(+IJ
Mai '•.ix' i, { . .. vE. rt ,: i - ' w r....tf=a►F...lh:'
tSTV 4 �a
•�� � 4V L :'� y !.�' a.` l� }'S ,' f � J R 1 P� � y�y'• �%�yy: r •.Y,..
�r � ''r .'r' �' ; i' 'r rs, �rS� E��l�l•1� Vi`e# a ��
'tl ' 'ter ,•r r•r. ! _ a 1("' '�"�`�,1��,c • �#
5 •� V 1 , }�.;i Yt � _,j �� � ar y
�1�� .. r_ -..�,,. �.y.,,,,; •'•.F'�-M yr, :+F , rxwt r i1 1 +, Ft -, ' s a� � y
r i �a t �� ' � � ` �...+Ixf�. � _. ''t � •'� � ��'r���'3 ht+' _'�ay.v4�( ;
tr.
k' ILA
�7 �..I-,+�i'wL;�'.•', .' 1, ' ��T.�Y:�YYi,•_" .. .. ,1` jr '. ��y�R• r''.'�'L*.
- ,
t r t � ^'� r � ` • •r-rI - ,. �,: r�lT� f 41, I ;r' � � .. - , ., . � ' , � r
.try) Y• ��11 � �+ �t1 �t'J;J; , '

. ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN RECEIVED
WATi:ROL LITySEC77ON
+ MAY 2 1
tt Non -Discharge Permitting
Producer: BENTON JOHNSON
Location: 5110 STRICKLAND CROSS ROADS ROADS
FOUR OAKS NC 27524
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Farrow to Feeder swine 1
Number of Animals: 1738.00 sows /600 Sz)W5 f 2S1b 1'eplacemen q,,Ar
(Design Capacity) xgvD z. S-ag ld3 -- 1-738 V
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important -in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1: Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. 'Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DEM regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
A.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same. -
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1738 sows x 7.3 tons waste/sows/year = 12687.4 tons
AMOUNT,OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
1738 sows x 6.5 lbs PAN/sows/year = 11297 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

• ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
--------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
8549
1
BnA
BH
$
400
0
20.32
8128
I
APR-SEP
8549 UN4 lGeD BH 8 1400 0 110.781431 2
I
IAPR.SEP.
END
I
TO
�AL112440
� irk
-- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE; The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
557
1
WaH
CO
550
55
0
15
825
MAY-JUN
557 1
W
0
JWaB
140 180
115 11200
FEB-MAR
557 1
SB 25 100
0
JWaB
115 11500
MAY.SEP
END
1r%AX an
Cc oh
8r?S�1J ;/�' AG = SS�iu p
I
TOTAL
iil a �! o
R .50� .rgnl
/
/$tea Ids -� /� %� L =/Dp Art Pf 4
Indicates
that this
field is being overseeded
(i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals
follow
summer annuals.
ls4e_ ni, rz,V
/o L C-4— 11,�Ual -0,
�� �ISG c7
J^d w
L'r�/�l cc c: 4 QS etobi
4,.,/rC,/
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
BH
CROP
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
UNITS jPER UNIT
50
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
[.ram
CO COTTON
SB SOYBEANS
W WHEAT
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND-2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
31.1
12440
.ate
�- i z ,
* BALANCE
-+6-&&
-----un L=.---------_..—
POUNDS ,1
BUSHELS 4
BUSHELS 2
9"/P�/y, /",. �- 4-0,
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
/�dl�: ,71
r S T r eI u�./! �✓e yS��-v •� c� e�.� /a �'arJ / / S /JD
/K
%fib 1� S 50 vn C c, T1�2 j9.,v a LtJAs le o " / Is Ci•v j 0vIpa /4 S
�C hb C�ci<P�^ r r O /!/ f / - r P /G/ / � ,4.47 C°.ry Ta ea -,,
/ f � y
�r /4 d e de �a� tea✓ G) reel-7Pn%, s-rrtev rc wS
e o � t.vl e,t;S- o ,eattJ dot's,- a- 40
/ y
cue l 0-ver6( C ct !'a X%�1•� 1161bl Al ,r�
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1911.8 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 9559
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 31.8633333333 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 76.472 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, -soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
0
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
I I
Field I
I
Soil Type I
557 j
1
WaB
557
i
I 1 I
f
WaB I
557
I
I 1 I
I
WaB
8549
I I
I 1 I
BnA I
8549
E
UN4 I
I I
I
GeD
I
IAppli.cation RatejApplic. Amount
Crop (in/hr) (inches)
I
CO
I .5
SB
1
.5
W
I .5
BH
I
I .75
BH
I .35
*1
C w-5
I 1-�� A o
I
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
4
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid. y
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste.application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied,to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. when applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUI_RED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner, is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with.no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate — determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for a1.1 other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:BENTONVILLE SOW FARM
owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at
the farm office and at 'the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDEM
upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: BENTON JOHNSON
(Please print)
Signature: L Date:- V 7
Name of Manager(If diff ent om owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Chris W. smith
Affiliation:MRCS Phone No. 919-989-5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
Signature: Date:
Page: 12

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
1, Nelson Rose, hereby give J & NC -Hog Farm Inc. permission to apply
animal waste on Tract # 557 consisting of 17,,. acres of cropland.
This waste will be applied according to the waste management plan provided
by the Joh"ton County ' Soil and Water Conservation District Office.
Length of the Agi#ement: JanuaEy 1. 1998 thru 12ggeMber 31 1998
Landowner: Nelson Rose ry
Signature:
Waste Pr(
Signature
NOTARY:
;DATE`
q g
COMMISSION EXPIRES:

~ ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I,
Waste Utilization_- Third Party Receiver Agreement
hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Environmental Management.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
Notary
Page: 14

JUL oe '9B 04:21PM JOHNSTON CO. COOP EX
P.114
rx,s� 733 —o7�y
0/ v. Sd, / 7�'
,pelf i�c icr%a t
LUiC f -1f'..ter

r
JUL 06 '99 04:2iPM JOHNSTON CO. COOP EX
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
P.2/4
TABLE 1; ACRES OWNDD BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-----_
APPLY
RESID_
'APPLIC
METH
8
400
N
20.32
TIME
5549
1
MIA
511
O
T12
I
APR-S EP
5119
APR. SEP .
END
Y
I
S
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
10.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
TAB 8 - -�on i 6. s of %s p/Pyj is he54 e 4 a e a- u�`e)
rp ✓i ded I �./
f� ro Cf uC r. / e, yo di4rek- iveeels c+
j �-'
r f
f/ A r)I �`d/Cp : 1ese
v 3
rut #1 e
�
J
l
Page: 3

JUL OB '98 64:21PM JOHNSTON CO. COOP EX P.3/4
r
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COM14 N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PRASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
---
or
--_�_--
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
15
TIME
557
1
Was
CO
550
55
0
825
MAY-JUN
557 1. jWaB I W 140 18-6-- O 115 11200
C FEB-MAR
557 1 1waB SE 25 100 0 115 11500
MAY.SEP
END
r74 au
�X on Ca�� S',7 1 t ` xe_ TOTAL
Indicates that this field is being overseaded (i.e. intexplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals. ry�
/ / ✓ ,� j .,J / I
�e �lS�c! I�'o�✓ CrQ% sa/c� fj a &Z1,10-11
D[t� T�1 rQS� da�/ AV d � s a r �!/ 1��0�� ep u �`r! La-
�- r7.'7to e4 ���ficc� ari X /J"rwJ� �E� � VeeC//
*� Acreage figures may exceed 'total acres e rfie1 to ,� a?e T
r�
overseedi.ng.�
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals to a equired nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) suppli
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE CROP UNITS PER UNIT
BH HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY 50
Page: 4

JUL 08 '98 04:22PM JOHNSTON CO. COOP EX P.4/4
. � • y I
ANIMAL WASTE UTIL12ATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
I
I
I
(Application
RatelApplic. Amount
Tract I
Field I Soil Type
I crop
(in/hr)
(inches)
557 11
I WaB
I co
I .5
I *1
I
557 1
I
1 I WaB
I
I SE
I
I .5
I
I *1
557 11
I WaB
I W
8549 11
I HriA
I BH
I .75
f. D
I
8549 l
I
VN'4 I GeD
I
I BH
I
I .35
I
I
I
I 1'��"��•
�I
ri- y'9-R
*
This is the maximum
application
mount allowed
for the oil
assuming the amount
of nitrogen
allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations,
the application
amount shown cannot
be applied because
of the nitrogen limitation.
The maximum
application amount
shown can be
applied under
optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of onto every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
Page: 7

JUN 11 '98 04:44PM JOHNSTON CO. COOP EX P.1/4
SOIL&WATER
CONSERVATION
JOHNSTON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
606 Notch Street • Smith field, North Carolina 27577 + (929) 989-W82
FAX TRANSMITTAL. SHEET
TO:
COMPANY NAME: . -=�
� / hu,�r-
FROM:
SUBJECT: <T-� iN\, ,5 LNrL&n--A- -T!.v �,,
NO. PAGES (including cover sheet) `-"'
MESSAGE:
WUAJA,1! WOOD SAMEAS, JR JAM W, KUGHZS JAMES F. LANGLEY JOW K LANCDON JOHN AL&M
2156 Lai UWm C hoth U 2435 US Hwy 7D $, Bus. 91 OremilarRoad r-28 Raleigh Pond Va Smith Road
Year 0" N, G :IG24 ataidm 1R N. C. r.sr' Ar»er. N. G 27501 8msoq H. G 27W4 SaWhAmid N. G 27677

JUN 11 '98 04:44PM JOHNSTON CO. COOP EX
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
P.2/4
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPz & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
CDNM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PM AC
AC
USED
----
or
--�---
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
PH
-
N
TIME
Bsd9
1
BrsA
a
400
0
20.32
6228
I
APR-SEP
6549 IUN4 4GeD
IAPR- SEP.
0 110.7814312
/To ALIx_90WiAl
- Indicates that this field is being averseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all. nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
/e%G�
1� ,
rc ui Cr i-p C�U C� i�, � i�o C�Gl�Py- /7eEefS f`4
kr- C cj e N e y / �5, I/ /
L C fj y lA M� � I ! � Ley/ I / : L/
j'0 b C ep/ p14 / C.
fL
t�l�!
/
Page: 3

JUN ,t1�', .�4� 4 M J STQ�N„C�. P.3/4
w .f ��y�a � f J1,7d�`' .:,;�`ra•' :.i c�°•�'i C �,. T�� �i'�,4 �7b, Nnn �5�� ���k
• for=--=� �_ -- - -- =en%on Johnson
rity----=----z��-- - >Johnson THE FOLLOWING
­­==. > 10 / 17 / 9 4 COMMANDS ARE
Dist. nearest residence (other than owner) => 2000 AVAILABLE FROM
Sows (farrow to finish) ==- --__— > ANYWHERE IN
SOWS (farrow to feeder)-- 1600 THE PROGRAM:
Heart (finishing) _= >
Sows (farrow to wean)--_.-__ ----...-.- �> TO PRIN DESIGN:
Head (wean to f eeder)> . \ z z
Storage volume for sludge acoum, (Cu.ft.) ==>
Treatment Volume (min. 1 cu. ft. per lb.)- --> 1.0 TO CLEAR DESIGN:
Inside top 494 \Cd yA+q g44,rfd,�!/>7/9
Inside top w idth�------_- -------�� > _ .. 2 9 6 /
Top of dike at elevation= == ==- =aa=-- => 47,00 )TO QUIT W/O SAVE
Freeboard -- _®--—.--=-_> 1: 0 ' \q
Side Slopes=- ------_ _= = _.---_��-- = —> 2.5
25 year - 24 hour rainfal.l.=----=-------"'"'> 6.8 TO GOTO SEEDING;
Bottom of lagoon at elevation- - - 35.30 \sr
Total required volume== 1207815
Total design volume available =— 1309�552 ,'"� 0 PRINT SPECS:
Design end pumping elevation = %'43.z0 \pC
Min. required treatment volume=—> 835200
Trmt# vol. at end pumping avail. ,926220'• � TO PRINT O & M:
Design start pumping elev. —__ _- --->' 45.30✓ \Po
Min. required perm. + temp, volume=> 1210896
Design vol.. at start pumping avail.> 1226692 TO GOTO WASTE U:
Seasonal high water table elevation==- —> 41.70 \wu
NOTE! Verify that temporary storage is adequate:
Min. required temporary volume=--=> 372615
Design temp. Vol. avail= _=-==--==> 383332
DJ, - =i e l d 86ok % 8 iIDa a t17 19 FY 1,0
✓'�6 � `J07]S �i.re.J ,�A r._r�r ✓' .r ,✓` ti•_. .. 'r ? ia.: '�iliJOl
J
!�
re7e- . ui�aT1 �Cdv ]tea ,v ! A JW4A GCS �( gQdd,O..s
I �
_ Ott aaurg »+.vrS �� e1c� ,Beo � I � �'•� � -'Z ;' i7 /99Y' C��s sm,
�Y1l. D r
! 6L A,1
! 1 ,/71?�
r

JUN 11 ' 96 04 a 45PM JOHNSTON 6C 6 .� SCOOP EX� r3 ^ � 0 /,V // 'Pit 11OV , P . 4/4
_-__==_�
Opera or-=�--_--�-__--__� -===>J AND M
County ==-= =_ == ---========—= =>Johnston THE FOLLOWING
COPZ ANDS ARE
Dist. nearest residence (other than owner)==> 1600 AVAILABLE FROM
Sows (farrow to finish) ­­=____� =___> ANYWHERE IN
Sows (farrow to feeder)=-=---0 THE PROGRAM:
Head finishing)489
Sows farrow to wean)=___________________�> To PRIN DESIGN:
Head (wean to feeder)=====_\pd
Storage volume for sludge accum. (cu.ft,) =_> 0
Treatment Volume (min. 1 cu. ft. per I To CLEAR DESIGN:
Inside top length—=—-__=r— =z—_tea=-> 200 \cd
Inside top 100
Top of dike at elevation==49.7Qka_q—Q TO QUIT W/O SAVE
Freeboard -- 1.0 A
Side Slopes—_3.0
z5 year - 24 hour rainfall�-6.8 To GOTO SEEDING:
Bottom of lagoon at elevation- === = e�7317-�A. \sr
Total required volume==�-=--_ =_--_> �51
Total. design volume available —,^_> To PRINT SPECS:
Design end pumping elevation===—____y6.�, 1Pc
min. required treatment volume== ==> 6601.5
Trac. vol. at end pumping avail.-==> 67582 TO PRINT d & M:
Design start pumping =—> 42n \po
Min. required perm. t temp, volume -a> 95614
Design vol, at start pumping avail.> 96627 TO GOTO WASTE U:
Seasonal high water table. elevation-- = =--_= > jCg44-.80 \wu
NOTE! Verify that temporary storage is adequate:
Min. required temporary volume- �=> 39160
Design temp. 'vol. avail= _-_> 40378
I l "
-% 3 c'071 e
p9AOCr M��CS S-fAND Rfl S

JUN 11 ' 98 04: 45PM JOHNSTO ~CEO. COOP EX ' ' � �� b/ /� T J� � P . 4/4
�1r� i�
-OpQratQ====----=>J AND M
County�===--_--- -Johnston THE FOLLOWING
Date=---_-.-= ------__- —=-_-- :=== --.---- =>04 / 19 / 9 6. COMMANDS ARE
Dist. nearest residence (other than owner) => 1600 AVAILABLE FROM
sows (farrow to finish)=- _==_==--=�- -a ANYWHERE IN
Soars (farrow to feeder) 0 THE PROGRAM:
Head (finishing)===�__ __-=__-__-- _ -_> 489
Sows (farrow to wean)TO PRIM DESIGN:
Dead (wean to feeder)= -_-...____-_---__=_> 1pd .
Storage volume for sludge accum. (cu.ft.) —_> 0
Treatment Volume (min. I cu. ft. per I TO CLEAR DESIGN:
Inside top length----- 200 \cd
Inside top width= = _----_- =w�==> 100
Tap of dike at elevation =__=__��--� �_____> �#9.7Q8. To QUIT W/O SAVE
Freeboard- = 1.0 \q
Side 3.0
25 year - 24 hour rainfall­�6.8 To GOTO SEEDING:
Bottom of lagoon at elevation==;�i;--. e.7��. \sr
Total required volume===�—_= =====> Qlm5.1�70Total design volume available—=--_> 079TO PRINT SPECS:
Design end pumping elevation-==----__---JICX4 i \pc
Min. required treatment volume====> 66015
Trzt. vol. at and pumping avail.=-=> 67582 TO PRINT 0 & M:
Design start pumping 42 On \pc
Min. required perm. + temp. volume-*> 95614
Design vol, at start pumping avail.> 96627 TO GOTO WASTE U:
Seasonal high water table elevation=--= ===> 15;S.44 , 80 \wu
NOTE! Verify that temporary storage is adequate:
Min. required temporary volumew== > 39160
Design temp. val. avail=- 40378
A r Ter
Oflvt�y dOWss
J J 5Z�d'
� 5 STANDARD5,AND 6
pAcTIC� M *4 ! A /yY� I.G

- on
o 1�tg�,o �b Pe;
:.
yt rya 00,
toc
` o ticc n O At
one #
1
OPe�atC1 P� � 'pA
O Cl. NO
ri ,�6t �Sy
Kai
,a b
•tea � � .� �
um.�IPM.a
�a
04eaw ��toato�`
t�Pesa
r
_ b
D
Gto4
�Yri9aiao
e
�•' dQ
ee $ 5A(1
�eot16]
CV' SO
OP
100
to sec 0p ttr
.st'a tBl
tot

-tT - /I
EMERGENCYACTION'OLAN
RECEIVED
WATER ""AL �sEcrror�
PHONE NUMBERS
�
DWQ 91.9- 571-4700 tllnj t u, d
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 91.9-989-5050
NRCS 919- 989-5381 flan Discharges Permitting
This -plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from..
. _. your .operation are leaking, "overflowing', or runnincr of-f
site. ,You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or,` -leave -your property to consider that you nave -a prcblem.
You'�should'make every. effort to::ensure'rthat'th's noes now .
.happen:. iThis blare should 'boosted 'in an accessible
location,-for"all -employees 'at the 'facility_ Th a fo = =o• _J r,c_ ,
are`scme'.action items you should ,take.
I. Stop'the release of wastes. Depending oa the
situation, this may or may not.be,possible. succested
responses to some possible.problems are listed below.
A: ;Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
:Y,
_
Add soil .to berm -to increase a e�rat_cr. :are,.
Pump!.wastes to :fields a c an =acceptable e
c. ,Stop all flows :to the 'laaocin riamed - ale_
-t' r d '` -Call ' a pumping contractor. -
e. Make sure no surface water,zs enter_nc
`H: ',Runoff from waste application ;field -actions
include:
„ -'a. Immediately stop waste applica---n.
:'b. Create a temporary diversion ", .ccn-_`:, :Yasz4.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce-runcf=.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the _eascr.(s, P az
t caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application razes fc _:e=____ds
,. where runaff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sc_r_rtlers-acc_ca
include:
a.
c.
Stop
Stop
Close
recvcie pump.
irrigation
cumc.
valves to
eliminate
,
- Sit
Ax
�
,., ;�� � i� =p,r r: P _� -r
_ .�,..r{11•,
;��r�i .I..r-' �' .�.
}F{• q ,�, �
!.[l l.. ,�
!�

d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush'systems, houses, solid
separators —action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d.. Stop all flows in the house; flush systems, or
solid separators.
e.' Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. often
this is seepage as„opposed to flowing leaks —
"possible action:
a.' Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,;.
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition oZ
the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
'damages
S
a. ,'Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. ,Approximately how.much�was released and for what.
.duration?
c. _:Any. damage noted, ''such as employee injury, fish
..kills, or property damage?
d. .Did the spill leave the property?
e. floes the spill have the potential to reach surface
'.waters?
f. could a future rain event cause the shill to reach
surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in dancer (either on or oL
o-3 the property)?
h. :how much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hour_, cali our C4vQ
(Di -vision of Water Qua1 i t'.1'���'_C^�: o-f-fice =hcne
A, tar hours, emercenc y nu, or:
733--3942. Your phone call snoujd include: vcur
name, facility, telephone number, the details of
r r � i ! '1. •r � 1.
S ski y� Ir,r ;i
�S�

the incident from item Z above, the exact'.locatian
of the facility, the location or direction of
• movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local Ems Phone number 9 L9-989 - 5050.
C. Instruct cis to contact local health De_cart-ment.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-989--�5380 , Loca1 SWCD
office phone number 919--989-5381, and local vRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919- 989- 5381.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask
s' that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
75: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: c B rr
b. Contractors Address:
C . Contractors Phone:
8 Rq— 71,xq —` i)o , ggy_,6 -s1
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: (_hri s _Smith
b. ?hone: 919 989--5381
-7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to :seep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
7.+wurryro ra.al bnd.itew.n,pelt
iti•`:(ii

Emergency Action PIan
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operations are leaking, overflowing, or
running off the site. You should NOT wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your property to
consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen. This
plan should be available to all employees at the facility, as accidents, leaks, and breaks can happen at any
time.
1) Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to problems are listed below:
a) Lagoon overflow:
• add soil to the berm to increase the elevation of the dam
• pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate
• stop all additional flow to the lagoon (waterers)
• call a pumping contractor
• make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon
Note: These activities should be started when your lagoon level has exceeded the temporary storage level.
b) Runoff from waste application field:
• - immediately stop waste application
• create a temporary diversion or berm to contain the waste on the field
• incorporate waste to reduce further runoff
c) Leaking from the waste distribution system:
• pipes and sprinklers:
O stop recycle (flushing system) pump
® stop irrigation pump
m close valves to eliminate further discharge
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
• flush system, houses, solids separators:
(D stop recycle (flushing system) pump
® stop irrigation pump
Q) make sure no siphon effect has been created
® separate pipes to create an air gap and stop flow
d) Leakage from base or sidewall of the lagoon. Often these are seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks:
�' • dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back
into the lagoon

• if holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals
and fill holes and compact with a clay type soil.
• other holes may be likewise temporarily plugged with clay soil.
Note: For permanent repair measures, lagoon problems require the
consultation of an individual experienced in their design and installation.
2) Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a) Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b) Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c) Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
3) Contact appropriate agencies.
a) During normal business hours, call your DWQ regional office: f919)571-4700 : after
hours, emergency number: 1-800-858-0368. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident, the exact location of the
facility, and the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind
conditions, what corrective measures have been taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b) If the spill leaves the property or enters surface waters, call the local EMS:
989-5050.
c) Instruct EMS to contact the local Health Department: 989-5200.
d) Contact CES: 989-5380
local NRCS office: 989-5381
and your integrator:_-
4) Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
5) Contact contract pumping and/or irrigation equipment companies:
a)
b)
c)

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
..._ �-`�iuu•� �: ......-._-..__....� Guise
I�.lYur.l�.+.l"--•-- �-�-------� I�WIIkI:l111Yd11C11[in
Anilkl.11 1111.1y ;,III fill:c) -
I'1�1111 �Illl,11.L'� •
13irly 11IM1111'e-COMCd aniuiill5
Wei lnunme-cuvercli Mum's
1II1-11's In ILtfldilkiic 011111•
Ill' Vel;elalive or WOMIC1I Illlflcrs;
Pr Recnminendul best nlilnasel11c111 practices;
r Goad judgillent and comillnn sense
W Dry flnors
frY Skilled floors;
R W.1ICMS ICICUICII over sloiled floors;
6 %ccdcrs al high cull of solid floors; -
Scrape luaaurc lulildup from floors;
{-{ I Iodcrlloor vel►liklion for lirying
Site Specific I'1-aclices
I, Lllllll a: Lldl.-1"I l.11l kill] • I11'ille; - -lid I'rerllH:nl 111MIule reol Vill by flush, 1111 l`lX1Ullh4,
• 1'MOid micrubiid 11ccn11 IM-Silillll or scrape;
n thidurllaor vcllltlatian
`1�1111l.1111111 I:.�IId�1�I l.11Y] - _--Volallll: �: ilSCS; 1:M1 nlilllltCM111I.X; _ „•- •�
Dina
W 1_I1icieat air nlovculcnl
--Duna
lud�l/u snl l.l�.:
f;r Wilsbdnwn Ire:Iwccn Itrc,upS of anillIMS;
�� 3
W Feed additives;
r 3
Cl I cclll:r r:uvl r�;
l f
lv+j 1'�lal i11:11VCly IIIIW115hllllt CKIL'llllel'} li3 fccdcr
covers
Agililiva of iecycled Ial;oou ^
n flush lank covers;-
lil lid wllilu links are lillin •
I !�
f7 Emend kill lilies uY ncilr bnilunl r,l I�ud;s Willi
:r• m
ikllll-51lllkllli Vents
n
WC :0
1'bl]b .Ill.:y.
Agilaliost thiring waslewalcr
fl llndcl•flaor Ilus11 Willi andcrllonr Vc111ilMioll
cy
L; [
_m
1'il la:, ll.ol .: lnuul: , T
Al;ililtinu of fcl ycled (a1;13or1
f7 1'sxlunr) rk cbarl;c kilos to nl:ilr I>nllonl ol•pils
O
Illplld while lids fire filling
tv1111 111111•Slllball VCllls
p
��
I.iii {;11i.,11, -
Al;ihllian dlirluL soup look
5 Sluup iank cowls
-• ''y-�.�'
-
lilliu� and drliwdn►vn
-
-
-
13111�I1I/: di.lill I OlIct'liUll •
Agilalinn during wasi :water
Box cuvcls
r4'-.•�-�--'
-
- ""'
ul luuLtY.ul III1I,I:S
clukvl:yiulcc
-
,
i�,,,.„
AAI( W, - 1,1/1v.un1+1:1 11. 1996,
lake 3

Cause
11MPs to Miulnlice 0dar
Silc Specific PI ucliees
_ _Sullrce _
l:nfi fll df;,lllplll�5 ill
• � �' \v:ISlc:tvaleF
•ilali A ou dllrill
n rxlCnll LIISLIIarl;l' pnllil (Yfpll)eS undcrllCalli
idl;+ltlll
CnllvCyallce -
laLilnll ll(lllltl level
I.ill.1141I1 Slll I•li:Ltt
VnIalde Las cilllssialls;
R' I'r'11 wr lagoon liquid ca lacll
• liiulnl;ical nlixiuL;
W cnrrecl latooll Slaililp pruculures;
-
• Agii:fiion
fl Mioiniunl surface area-in-volimic ralio;
-
fYMinirllunl abilalion when punlpillu;
n Mechanical aeration;
n Proven lliolnuieal additives :..
If I il;,lliln+ Ylu inLILA —
-- • 1 iil;lt pressure auilaiion;
I;KIrril;alu nn dry days Willi Hula: of fin winll;
• lViutl drill
f17�Mininuull rcc nluniended nperatinl; pressure.,
,
II111113 ill ake near lagoon 11(lnid surface;
n Illliall from second-slage lagnall
I'arliul Illicrnlliai dectimposiliun;
M iinllnul or midlevel loading;
tall LILL;
Mix in while, filling '
b b..
n Taill. covers;
-
• A1;iiiliinll Whelk calplyiflll
Fl Ilasiil 51Irf Ice 111aIS If SnlitlS;
:...., _:.
n hr/lveu biological adllilives or oxidanls'--
5culiui; L.,,iu snl lal c
- lial nlicrnllial lleconlposilioll;
n tixlcild drainpipe nullcis uuticrncalll"-
• hlizillu while iillrul,� .
level;
n
• Al;iialion wheii`elllplyilll;
1-1 Ilemove st:Illc(l soIills wgillally
LI.Irlu,c, 11mly m ]hllh;l:
Al;iwlinu when Splcading;
n
Soil injection1111C.1111A
millciz.Vulatlle
Awl emissions
n
wasi, residtim rllanlire fill,,, Y13remief aner Ilsc;
.
-
l-7
I'l'flYeit Wallall;iGal ;nllliiiVCS Ill' IlxiflillllY -
Iaf l�cic�i ul.u,i,ll,
TVulalile Las culiSSiMIS %Vllile
n
Suil injection ul sllnrylslulll;es "«
auk, y 111 A11.11;t 1111 i1cLl
IlfyiuL
n
Soil ilicorporalioll wilhiu CIS Ins , '
lilt l:1l:L:g
IK Sprl:nll In (lull uniflll711 layers jeer rill3ld Ellylllh�. -
• ..
-~ s ,,-,+-ti.r_. ..- -• .. --
n
Prover) ll111111(;Icill $1111111Y15�nr IUillldt111-:";J ,.'�- :1-= '
--! ),;.Ill :1111111.11+ •.._f
licass decomposition ..-.
- I , _.
I 1 ?• -.:• :. ...
I(3per IIrSIInSIIi(1111/i L'ilrl%ilssl:5«_i?+,:'...,,-
i)c ul .auul.11 •li 11.r:11
f::Il'cass+icennlll<uiliflu
n
C(Impleic cuvur,iul; )! calc:ls::cs ill hul'i:ll Ails;:.;
l l t- I it 4 I.i 111 IZ.
rl.�' I1
•r! i 1.
rt'
' .
l
Al%V 11 : 1 lLjVt:ull,L.l E l• 1'J'.11,, i';Il;f •1 _

use
BMPs In milillilize Other
• N-liclilbial dermillitisifitill of uway kwu Mcmus
ig iliki[;
SHc SpcdAc Pradlecs
I ... I
L3
Ill.milic llilcl,c11 WIM. 111mlly majillaillud access roads
Imblit: wadi litim Canu
AccWh
Aildilimial lilkimialim) Available I foist
inc hl.smue Manal;cnicia ; 006 ittile/lIM11 lliiL;L.cl NCSIJ. Callilly I-glailsifill Cooler
Seville Pl liallactiml Elul 1,111clilial Odar Snurces and l(cilictlics ; IHIA E Wa Slicial NCSIJ - BAF
%%VjjjL; J'jO1jjjCjjji6jj J:at:jjjjy NjjjjjjjfC MalkaBC111cm: Pil Recilai-ga - Lujymn Ticalincal F NCSW - HAF
_Swine I'llithiLliMi I"aCilily Njj1jjim; Minsaigmuma; Undolksur FWsh - lagumi Scaustum RUAll 129-18 NCMJ - UAI-.
I Aguml Design mid h1miriga"Ma Or Livesloqk ManurcTrealmeal and Sifirage ; EA16 1.1. 183-83 NCSLJ - BAE
jBild Wasiewaler Applicaliam Filtdimucat FBAF Fact Sli4:4;1 MCM I - RAF
Fablitillifilig (1414als 1141111 Swine litlildilkgs ; 11111M NCSIJ - Swine I-imension
Euvifimmenlid Ati:mrwice hogram ; N1111C Manual NC Pule: 1'rochicers Assoc
I 1pti4jm. I w Him;igliq I Idnr ; a ielnwi Emu Him Swhw Olw llsk Pume HCSH Agri Cmultsunieminns
l.lLll:..11lLC COOLuILI!, in Aidimil Nimillic Hallagiallicill: 011(ils and Flies PROW. 199S Coill , L:Icllt;c I'mcculings Flillida clifycl-alive I..'Xicilsiall
hie Q
7,
Z Ink
, is
1 I
I I 91f. Page

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Sulu cc Cause LIMPS Ica Cullll'ol Insects T Site Specific I`l iclices _.
Liquid Syslems
1111111 rllucrs ACC11111d11ali011 of solids ar Mush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accu ulluled solids from
tillers as designed.
LR' ltMove bridging of accuniulawl solids ill
LiLl;nuul Wid HIS Crusled Solids ar Maintain luboons, Setllillg basins alld polS Whed'>r
pest breeding is apparent to lninhui= the
crusting of solids to a dep111 of no More Ulan 6 -
�i inches over lltore [Ilan 30% of surface,
I_AccssiVt! Vt:l;l't:11iVt: • I)ccaying vegelallan rd/Maintain vegeialive control along bunks of
d irtn► Ili lagoons and oilier impoundments to prevent
accuunllation of decaying vegetative planer : , . `
along wader's edge oil hupouudnlenl's perinlelcr.
fury Systems
_
1'cLIII 1J Fuetl �IIlI1:1gC - Design, operillL' e1n11 I11:IhIta131 fl:Ld Sysici115 (e.g.,
bunkers and trongbs) to mininlize Ilse
cclnnulation ofdecuying wastage..
fiT Goan up spillage on a routine basis (e•g., 7 - 10
day interval during st m ner; 15-70day inderval
during winder).
_
�I t ell Slulal;t: -- Accumulalions of fcc d residues (wf 1(cillice ulolslllrc uccuillulalioll Wllhill and
aremlld 411111cdialc perillkwel' of feed sloragc
_ argils by ins111111g df:1111:lue away fl-11111 lilt:
-_ ''•
witlior providing adegnade coiliailnncll[
covered bill Ior brewer's grain and sdnlll:n high
`
nit) isltire grain pruchecls):
Inspect iilr and renulve ur brt :1k up uccunluladt el
1-
solids in filter strips around feed slorage Its
needed
_
AMII' - titwumbc1 11, 096. Page I

t
Smirec Clouse RAM to Control Inseets Sile Slicritic I'raclicrs
Animal I lolding Aicas Accumulations aFanimal wastes Eliminate low areas that Irap moisture Along
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
immal.
W Maintain fence rows and f►ller'strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry h1aamu I Iandliing • Accumulations ofauintial wastes 0 Remove spillage on a routine basis (c.g., 7 - 10
Systems clay interval during summer•, I5-30 day interval
daring winter) where wanure is loaded for land
applicnlion or disposal. - -
❑ Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
r] Inspect for and remove or break up uecunnalated
wastes in Ulcer strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For mire inforam ion contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Enlomology, Box 7613, Norlh Carolina Stale 116versity,
Raleigh, NC. 37695-7613.

Nlortality Management Methods
(check: which method(s) are being implemented)
�! Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within ?-1. hours after
knowledze of the death. The burial must be at lust 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rende-ing at a.renderinz plant licensed under G.S. I06-163.7
Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, piacina in' a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture `
:.d Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without a idanQerina
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Vete:;narian must be
attached)
• Rz,_': C�r 1 loci;

— AA0 SCS ��,V0Ar
peratpr=------- = ------------------------------- _- ===>Beriton Johnson
2ounty==========__====------===== ==== =====>Johnson
THE FOLLOWING
------ ===========>10/17/94
COMMANDS ARE
]ist. nearest residence (other than owner)==> 2000
AVAILABLE FROM
T,ws (farrow to finish)=---====--========== >
ANYWHERE IN
his (farrow to feeder)=============---=====> 1600
THE PROGRAM:
36ad (finishing)=----===_============----===>
Sows (farrow to wean)====------=============>
TO PRIN DESIGN:
3ead (wean to feeder)======_=====---==--====>
\zz
Storage volume for sludge accum. (cu.ft.)===>
Creatment Volume (min. 1 cu. ft. per lb.)===>
1.0 TO
CLEAR DESIGN:
Inside top length=======- ---------------- ====>
494
\cd yGfq A4foo..-'V171f5/
Inside top width=== =========___=_ -------- >
_296
Cop of dike at elevation=======_____________>
47.00TO
�
QUIT W/O SAVE
Freeboard======___=---===-=-=--=-=--==----->
1.0
1q
Side Slopes=-===_=_______________________>
2.5
25 year -"24 hour rainfall==================>
6.8 TO
GOTO SEEDING:
3ottom of lagoon at elevation============--
?5.30
\sr
Cotal required volume===========---> 207815
Cotal design volume available====== 1309/552
TO
PRINT SPECS:
Design end pumping elevation--�___--
(433.20v'�\pc
Min..required treatment volume====--> 835200
Crmt.°vol. at end pumping avail.===> (926220
TO
PRINT 0 & M:
Design start pumping elev.====_ -- _ ==----_>
45.30 ✓
\po
Kin. required perm. + temp. volume=> 1210896
Design vol. at start pumping avail.> 1226692
TO
GOTO WASTE U:
Seasonal high water table elevation=========>
41.70
\wu
!TOTE! Verify that temporary storage is adequate:
Kin. required temporary volume=====> 372615
Design temp. vol. avail=======_==__> 383332
,DJ'_ ga ok / 8 P6 c la t17 / 9 9
9 y �
1U6-60W3— F�rrOtJ 7b FGC[�rr t'r (jj� 6•� % /9��ri 11il- e1q
/Vale_: rii/a is cc�haT `�1/ ea�� /� +de- %,7 A)on SCJ /Vbe.. / 0,"
t"t4aurt rra is a,, k /8 Pt4e� 12 �-!7 /99ri" C/iN� 5•�• T"�
#,' 10C:D:-e F� r1i k16 e
l Zi.5 tv. // b c. k s e- f 'Tor c e ,- / 7`i Cc Tj017 1 x,5e,/
on prtsr'll Yolu'we5,

TOM CROCKETT IRRIGATION, INC.
751 E. MAIN ST. • P. O. BOX 390
WILLIAMSTON, NC 27892
[phone]
a
RECEWED RICE QUOTATION
WATER Ctl!P! !TY SECf10 I 41797
HAY Z I I398
rLEASE INDICATE iNIS
NUMDEn WI IF.NOIIDEIIINII
Non -Discharge Permit ng
/97
r YOUR INQUIRY DA I ED
1 J & M HOG FARM
GEORGE MASSENGILL PROPOSED SIerriNODATE
4960 NC HWY 96 SOUTH
FOUR OAKS NC 27524 TERMS NET FOR
NET 0 DAYS
SHIPPING POINT
YAMUHM
L J USDA -MRCS AGENT: JOY SHERROD
TO BE SIIIPPED VIA rig In gaL
Here Is our quotation on the goods named, subject to [lie conditions noted:
and agreements are contingent upon smkes, accidents. fires, availability of materials and all other causes beyond our conlml. Prices are based on costs and conditions existing on dale
of quotation and are subject to change by the Seller before final acceptance.
Typographical and sfenographio errors subject to correction. Purchaser agrees to accept either overage or shortage not in excess often Percent to be charged for pro rala.
Purchasarassumes liability forpatenl andcopyrighl infringement when goods are made to Purchaser'sspecilicalions. Wlrengtmtntiorrspecifiesnraterialtobefurnistredbylheruerlmser.
ample allowance must be made for reasonable spoilago and material must be of suitable qunlily to hci/ilate efficient production.
Conditions not specificallyslaledherein shall be governed by established trade customs. Terms inconsistent with those staled herein which may appear on Purchasers lomml
order will not be binding on the Seller.
OUANIITY
DESCRIPTION
PRICE
AMOUNt
1 3900'
6" PR-160 PVC pipe
1.66
$ 6,474.00
2 2000'
4" PR-160 PVC pipe
.82
1,640.00
3 5680'
3" PR-160 PVC pipe
.52
2,953.60
4 2400'
2" PR-200 PVC pipe
.32
768.00
5 140'
2" SCH 40 PVC pipe
.58
81.20
6 120'
1" SCH 40 PVC pipe
.29
34.80
7 1
6" flanged zee w/3" MPT
495.00
8 5
6" tees
57.95
289.75
9 4
6 x 4 crosses
237.65
950.60
10 5
4" crosses
20.01
100.05
11 4
4" tees
17.21
68.84
12 3
6" 90' elbows
36.88
110.64
13 3
4" 900 elbows
11.60
34.80
14 2
4" 45g elbows
15.12
30.24
15 5
6 x 4 bushings
17.43
87.15
16 2
6 x 2 bushings
17.43
34.88
17 10
4 x 2 bushings
7.04
70.40
18 10
4 x 3 bushings
7.04
70.40
19 2
6 x 3 bushings
17.43
34.86
20 5
6 x 2 tees
57.95
289.75
21 49
3 x 2 tees
10.34
506.66
22 5
2" male adapters
1.14
5.70
23 49
2" 90g elbows
1.78
87.22
24 1
3" 900 elbow
6.48
25 10
3" caps
3.19
31.90
26 1
6 x 4 tee
57.95
27 4
6 x 1 tees
59.27
237.08
28 14
4 x 1 tees
17.21
240.94
PLEASE ONTINUE
***PVC PIPE PRICES MAY BE HIGHER OR LOWER AT TIME OF ORDER
ronMw4m. RAPOFORMS.
INC 10nEO90ER CALL W257l554 FAX W45t 9113
nRq
OUOTE VALID FOR DAYS. BY V c.-�/L 1. T �.'�U/C -A

TOM CROCKETT IRRIGATION, INC.
751 E_ MAIN ST. • P. O. BOX 390
WILLIAMSTON, NC 27892
[phone]
J & M HOG FARM
GEORGE MASSENGILL
PRICE QUOTATION
41797
PAGE 2
- PIEASE 1NDICAtE 1tuS
NLJMtSi"ti WI IF.NOn1fEnING
4/17/91
rlY nA
PROPOSED St11PPING 0AIF.
iEnMs DAY5
�iU SHIPPING POINT
MUEMKM
L J USDA-NRCS AGENT: JOY SHERROD
Tcrxl
Jere Is our quotation on the goods named, subject to the conditions noted: 10 BE SNIPPED VIA rpp
CONDITIONS: The prices and terms on this quotation are not subject to verbal changes or other ngreernents unless approved in writing by the Nome 011ice of the Seller. INN quolaf+bos
and agreements are contingent upon strikes, accidents, fires, availability of materials and all other causes beyond our control. Prices are based on costs and condifiorrs existing orh dote
of quotation and are sukoct to change by the Seller before final acceptance.
Typographical and stenographic errors subject to correction. Purchaser agrees to nccept either overage or shortage not irF excess often percent In be chvged for pro rasa,
Purchaser assumes liability for patent and copyright infringement when goods are made to Purchaser's speciticalions. When quotation specifies maferial io be furnished by the purchaser,
ample allowance musf be made for reasonable spoilage and material must he of suitable qualify to facilitate efficient production.
Condifibrisnof specifically stafedhereirt shallbe governed by established trade customs. Terms inconsistent wilhthose slated herein which may appear onPurcloser;c formal
order will not be binding on the Seller,
Em QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
PRICE
_AMOUN i'__
29 3
3 x 1 tees
10.34
$ 31.02
30 54
2 x 1 tees
2.35
126.9C
31 150
1" 900 elbows
.60
90.0E
32 2
33 16
4 x 2 tees
2"
17.21
34.42
34 49
caps
2" SCH 80 female adapters
.91
19.64
14.56
962.36
35 75
1" SCH 80 female adapters
5.66
424.50
36 75
37 33
RC-1 quick couplers w/rubber covers
20.85
1,563.75
38 10
ART-1 x 18 risers
P-65 sprinklers, 1/4 nozzle, part circle
75.00
138-60
750.00
39 23
40 49
7025 RD, 1/4 nozzle, full circle
z49
39.19
901.37
" MM1Tgs FQC quick couplers
12.63
618.87
42 7
2 MPT X MQC quick couplers
6.96
8.21
341.04
57.47
43 2
44
SR-100 guns, .5 nozzle
1,062.95
2,125.90
5
45 1
F--100 guns, .5 nozzle
692.95
3,464.75
46
B3ZPBHS, 40 HP pump
4,123.00
1
6 underground gate valve
308.98
47 1
4 x 6 intake adapter
95.00
48 1
3" brass gate valve
45.00
49 6
AV-200 air vents
33.85
203.10
50 80'
8" black corrugated pipe for collars
1.62
129.60
51 1
Set miscellaneous steel fittings for pump connection
110.00
52 1
#9 hand primer
158.00
53 1
6" X 35' suction hose
395.10
33,00 .1
LESS 25%, items 7-45
4 902.70
2 -46
Installation of PVC pipe less concrete and 4 X 4 posts
,103.
12 816.00
0,919.
***PVC PIPE PRICES MAY BE HIGHER OR LOWER AT TIME 04RDER
FOIL 50407. RAMOFORM5, INC.: IO REORDER CAtk !W 757.0354:17AX EM 451.0115
QUOTE VALID FOR DAYS.

TAELE 4 - irrigatCn SYStIE t SPecifCZdons SPRINKLER SYSTEM
GEORGE MASSENGILL
Tr winq
Isrig3tSa.s cum
S-ftw Svc
�rriraten
F a.. F-ts at Sofvt�:Q !SPmi
I I 14.2
ct wd2anq P-C=m,st as P-0 ip-i
I 79
c.ftuga P-o=Q&° Rx*
1.21 / . 28
U-9ft+*40
I 1 �x
Tjow at Sp**d C4moe ter,
! I xxxxrxxx
r two, Zk--�
i iE=lc
(bl)
!128.57
1
! I
7ABLE5 - ThrusHtack SaeLi�catienst
Cesier«rmav aravide thrust bicck details art secarate sheet
l CCU T CtV
`—.w.is
j
T EX .:cx
AFEA ; se..tl
9qr34=mi
4" I
1.75
nt.a Ea
2" 1
Ta,r
6
(L'EE
4" I
1.25
O° Bend
6" 1
3.25
I
I
f
I
1
F:eid Ctitcr ;rival l uid, S-=Z u i J, is Cc C.:,Ge;.8-00.
USE 1Lcfl FCR SUIL-Bz:-R241C SIN=
;r-ieatscn QTCA `Ml:z
ccccaer t595 dace `lar,1 carv4irn;

TASEL E 4� - Irrigation System Spercifcations GL7,Lj SYST-
GEORGE MASSENGIU
Trr.rirtig j sus Set
!rri�gzticn cnrr . ! I
Faa.. Rita of Sorw*.Ww (STri
I I 60 I
'9 P-essurs aP-a o
87
C—ogn R=WiirWh"
I 1.29/.58
)40,.k—;M Y—)
I I xxxx,axx
Type of Sped Carnpern;zocrr
I x=ca=x
P—p Type tPTO.
29.6
� I
I I
' I I
TAHL E- 5 - T hrus� Eicck Specincatiocss
0psic rerrrrav -if nvide thrust b1ccir details oa saver -ate s:ieft
CC-AT7c"
APB (3e. t)
!KTImA
4" 1
2.0
De"=md
31.
.
Tec
6"
2.75
TEE
4" 1
1.5
900 bend
W, 4
3.
i
'S�- VSO.s.-` RC i cx:d C ff,- 7&--r=l Cuide- Scoa Pf, ?x�r^ Cxe 4ZO-30_
USE 1=Cfl FCR -Z:=f ==
irr,Cadcn Plf3rreterS US�A.yF?C�
CC:cGer 'Sat

TABLE 3 - SoHd Set Irrigation Gun Settings GEORGE MASSkNG=
•
Make, Mode! and Type of Equipment_ 7025
RD SPRINKLERS, 1/4 NOZZLE,
60 PSI, 14.2
GPM, 135'
DLaMh=
Field No'
and
Line Noe
Humber of
Hydrants
Wetted
O(ametet
free!)
Hydrant Spacing (II)
Alanq Between
Plpellne P'pdinea
Appiication
Pate
(Inihr)
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Nozzle Operating Operating
diameter Pressure Time
(incises) raj Gurr, (psi) @ Hydrant (hr)
Comments
1 1
13
I 135'
I 80
I 80
I
1/4
I I
I 1.95 ACRES
2 j
3
! ,.
I ..
I ..
I
I
I w I
I .45
3 I
5
I
I ,.
I ,.
I .21 /. 28
I ,.
I '; I
j .72
5
.21
.75
1.05
I
5
.75
7
1 2
I ,.
I ��
I ,.
I ,.
I
'*
I .3
8
7
.21/.28
•91
9
I ,.
I ..
I
I „
I I
I .99
10
I q
! ..
I ,.
I �.
I
I
I „
,.
I1.32
11
8I
'�
4 ��
I ,.
I "
i ��
I �� i
„
i 1.17
12
I 4
i '�
I ,.
I „
„
I ..
I !
,.
I .42
!
I
I
I
I
I I
I10.78 ACRES
I
I
I
I
I I
I
!
I
1
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3 I
I
-
I
I
I
i
l
I
I
I I
'See attached map provided by the !=ie!d Office for teld location(s).
'Show separate entries for each pipe ine wiih hydrants in each [ie!d..
Irrigation Pararne!ers 1JS0A2.'RCS
Cctaber 1395 page.'. `Jartlf Carolina

TABLE 3 - Sand Set Irrigation Gun Settings GEORGE `ASSENGILL
Make, Mode! and Type of Equipment- F-100 GUNS, .5 NOZZLE, 60 GPM, 70 PSI, 225' DIAMETER
Field Not
and
Line No'
Number of
Hydrants
wetted
Diameter
(reet)
i Hydrant Spacing (rt)
I Along Between
PTpellne Pipellnes
Appticatton
Rate
(Tru hr)
CFE ATINQ PARAMETERS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Olameter Pressure Time
(Inches) @ Gun {psi) @ Hydrant (hr)
Comments
1
1 8 I
225'
I1 Lo14o
I
70
2
1 10 I
I ,. ! ,.
I 28 / . 38
I .5 J
,.
I ,� .,
! 4.38
3
1 10
�t
I �. I �.
I .29 / . 58 I .5 !
„
I ., „
1 4.28
4
1 9 1
I „ I „
.29/.56A.38 .5 1
,.
! ��
! 3.71
5
I 9 I
,.
! !
! 38 1 .5 I
I„
j3-57
6!
3
. 29 /. 38 I .5 I
I ,.
I1 9
!
I I
I I I
I
120.32 ACMES
I
I
I
I
!
I I
I
I
!
I
I I
I I
I
I
!
I
!
I !
I I
I
1
I
! I
I I
1
!
1
I
I I
! I
I
1
I
I
I I
I I
I
i
i
I
I I
f
i
1
I
I I
I I
#
I
'Sea attached rnzo provided by the Field Office for field locatior,(s).
'Show separate entries for each pipeline with hydrants in esrh ie!d.
Irrigation Parameters USCA-MRCS
October le$5 page !North Carc;ina

TOM CROCKETT IRRIGATION, INC
• P.O. BOX 390 0 WILLIAMSTON, NORTH CAnOLINA 27892 • 91 9--792-3121
J&M140GFARM
GEORGE MASSENGILL
4960 NC llWY 96 SOUTH
FOUR OAKS NC 27524
SPRINKLER 7025 RD, 1/4 NOZZLE, 60 PSI, 1,42 GPM, 135' DIAMETER
60% X 135 - 81'; USE 80' SPACING
GUNS F-100 GUN, .5 NOZZLE, 70 PSI, 60 GPM, 225' DIAMETER
60% X 225 = 135; USE 140' SPACING
APPLICATION
96.3 X 1.4.2 1367.46 = .21 FULL CIRCLE
RATE/SPRINKLER
80 X 0 707-
X = .2.8 PART CIRCLE
.21
27'Q
APPLICATION
96.3 X 60 5778 = .29 FULL CIRCLE
RATE/GUNS
140 X 1�0� 19 000
X 360 = .38 PART CIRCLE 2700
.29
270
x 360 = .58 PART CIRCLE 180'
.29
180
TDIU SPRINKLER
1030' 6" PVC PIPE @ 468 GPM, 58 PER 100'
160' 4" PVC PIPE @ 227 GPM
SUCTION LIFT 4'
ELEVATION INCLUDING RISER HEIGHT
SPRINKLER PSI
6" GATE VALVE @ 468 GPM
2" LATERAL W/5 SPRINKLERS
6" CIFECK VALVE 468 GPM
TDII/GUNS
2100' 6" PVC PIPE @ 420 GPM, .47 PER 100'
3" LATERAL 60 GPM, .28
240' 4" MAINLINE @ 120 GPM .3
4' SUCTION LIFT
SPRINKLER PSI
6" CIfECK VALVE @ 420 GPM
5.9
1.5
1.7
1.7
6o.o
2.2
4.0
1.5
711.5 OR 1.81 .34'
9.8
I..9
.72
1.7
70.0
1..4
81.22 OR 201.48'
PIPE/FITTINGS PVC IS SDR-26, PR-160 & SCH 40 FITTINGS ARE SCII 40 & 80.
110RSEPOWER GUN: 201.48 X 420 84621.6 - 29.68 UP
3960 X . 72 285.1.2
SPRINKLER: 181.34 X 468 84867.12 = 28.57 lFP
3960 X .75 2970
VERN PARKER 4/17/97

�' �1`jYVC� QWYJCl/ �9P
4 Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
Esistina roe; i�e��•.. ors EY anded { Iee'circleane)-'
Gene' �l Infcirriiatitiri:' - - -
"
Dame of"Fatal: '�` _ —.r c .Facility No:.�-,- :
_._... - _
O�vner(s)�tiame: +�� �t �Ji% �;, :I�" PSane No:_ 89-�� _
Mailing Address: d 1-111, s
Farr Location: Count%- Farm is located inY - a 17
Latitude. and Lon sirude: "_SS- JL_ Z ° � � � �
-
Pl6ase attach a copy of a county road map with locatiorr identified and"descriQe=below-(Be;sge:.ifc: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): Fr a� soN �� r _�4,} oa SR /Qo.9 Gry;. / 2 h,,1--
_f A_,'�R7'T' 'TR✓M `Y /Ai /t ' O �T �,j��OD�. — � 6� • �«�.�ilr�f• • � � .�._-- �-•--- '""' .
eration-Descri tion:-
-ripe of5+4iar.M' "No: of.ininrals T�•pe-cfPoulrn-, .-.-No. of:in mais ._. ---:TiPe"afCarrle :-..-No. of Animals
C1 Wean to Feeder -Z Laver , ... Dairy
rt Feeder to Finish i Pallets ZI Beef
J F ow to Wean
arrow io Feeder 1.73 R- - =
J Farrow-to'Finish- -"' Other pe of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Aln
we s
:tom.: • ,-•
an Lng O eradan Only ,VIA
Previous Design Capacirv: - ~" - -- - ` Addirioital Design- Capaciry: -• ' F
Toral Design Covacirr: 04-
Acreage Available for Application: %�� - Required Acreage: �. 07 "
Number of Lanoons / Storage Ponds :�: _ Total Capacity: J 1 S"I Z;_ Cdbic Feer (ft3)
--Are_subsurface-drains.present_orLthe.farm:_I-ES.or _NO--' .(please_circle_one)�y.�,_,�
If -YES: -are subsurface -drains .present.in.the area of;_the _LAGOON or SPRAT' FIELD (please.circle.one)
W­hi F1 1 anagerA�eement.........
___-._.._..
::-
—I Ove) verify -that all -the abovrinfarmadoa is.correc: and•will_be gpdatd roan chanQiszs. i Orel understand the operation aaa
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste managetent pl�ari for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity.of the waste.treauneat and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new .ce-tifcation-ro 'be-subifftt6ii-t*u-t&c=Division. of
Environmental Mana:e:nezt before the newanimals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be `ao iiischarze-ofanimza
waste from the staraee or app€ication syste:n to surface waters of the state either directly through a man -tide conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 2f-ye2r. ? *-Sour storm and there must not be run-off from-dheagplication-of animal
waste. 'I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants tram lounging, and heavy use areas must be minimized" sing technical
standards devc!cped by the Nziurzl Resources Conse7•2ticn Se vice. The anp"ved plan will be filed at the farm and at the
orticc of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I twe, know that any modiitcatien must be approved. by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Consen'aticn District prior to imptementzuon. A change in land ownership
requires writtcn notification to DEP or a If th= appro+e 'plait is :hanged% within 50 cars of n tide transfer.
\ante of Land Ncner :
Sig -nature: ' Date:
Name o0Isna2 r.if dif- -z'it tro «' :►: .r-+
- - Signature: - - — - -- - _ -- - —._..._.-_Date:
AWC -- Januurr 1. lull—

Technical Specialist Certification
J. -,.As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Co.rimission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0003. 1 ccrtifv that the animal waste,
management system fo_r_ffF_ft�fi��-Ed-abovc has'an animal -waste
thar-me_-'tsor exceeds-standardsan'specifications­ —'bf the &t jsidn'ofEnviionmenml Manageme L it (DE.M) d __y
as specified in ISA NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)_indl6FIE_North
' Caralini Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to I SA NCAC 2H-0217 and 15A-cNC-AC _6iz-.bdO I ­.'6065-,'-The
--followini-eemenLS are included, in -the. plan-as,applical4le.
_]LhLIkS,.e2CLCaLezary designates a echnical specialist who.!nay
-
sign each c.-r:iitcation(,SD..Sl.;WT-.P, RC, 1),the technical specialist should only ccrtiryparts_ fdr —which' ihey a'
re, technicilly
COMpCtCnL
F"
Ilr�i:��ca�'oti o�Desig i} z�.��^ � ':�r:��:; .��t;�Y�t w .tit �
ilLA
A) Coljecfibn_Sttia,c4_ TreatgientSV'Tt_em_
-Crm,cYdze appropfiari'563c
z �-;
Z-1 -
Existij]sfacilityurithou FOfit(SD ­orWUpX--___ _7
S torage, volume: -is- adequate- for -operation - calpacity;--storage -capability. consistent with. waste utilization
IVR C 5 '4 4
retrofitted facility (SD) AA
Animal wasm-storage and trea=e'ni-st crures, such asbut not limited to collecti6n, systems• lagoons an onds, 41RC5
have -been designed to meet, or exceed the minimum standards and specHicaticas.
PRC-S Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print). (�L,1'57_
Affiliation: "ARC S'
Signature: Date:
2
B)
separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydriulic Od'iiile_EiCloading rates--
_ IrU -T %= = _
Name of Technical Si iedi-alik-(Please Print' )'_ et- 57
­A:ffiliatfdfi.
Address(.-%gency O� �� S..`� •. _ .. _
/V/)?
:KEqcilitv without exterior lots. (5D or WW or RC)
. This. facility does not contain any exterior lots.
�7S7)
:1 F:!ciT]cv with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed
in
'accordance with technical standards developed by MRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Plea -se Print):
Affiliation:
Add re--fl.Agency): Phonic e
Si­'6atuke-
%
A«-C­ Junuuryl.19'97 2

4 D). Application and Handling Equipment
Check the apprapriwe box
Q E.,<ict'n, or exnandina facility with e.cistinY waste application equipment (WZ P'or T)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the ,plan_bas been_eitherfield_caiibrated-or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and-is.able:�a" p� waste as necessary to accommodate the
-waste management plart:..{existing-application equipment, can -cover, the. area,reauered by the plan, ar rates not to
exceed.eithe_,the. •spec ified hydraulic.or-nutnent loading:rates..;&•schedule, for timing of _applications has been
established: required buffers can be- maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance arc contained as part of
the plan).
,Ha'rR�n "1;.3z tn
or existing facility without existing 4,aste application eC(Ilinment for syray
irrigation.. (I)' —�
_—_..._—Animal._wasteraoplicatiom.equiument,speci-tied-tn-the:plam"-I;as beep desiairr'.l: to applwvraste as.tie.essa iota
accommodate the waste manasemenr-plan:.(proposed. appl.icattom equipment can- cover -the area -recuired._ it y4the
plan:ar:at-es'not io exc�Fthe:"i5e spec?fief'i"iydi3lTE'lc""brnr[rtlz�ri"o"adiaa:rates;. a.scacduTe:fortiunaMof
applications his:be--esta6lisitcdLrequircd buffers can be maintained; calibration and ad'rti"strricrtr-gutdaticc are
coutamedas part 6f the:plan),
.._
1 New. expanded. or existing facility without existing waste aeylication.eauipment for. Viand
spreading not usine sarav irrigation.~(W P or I)�----=--
Animal waste application equipment -specified in the plan has be= selected to apply ';,caste as necessary •to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan=ae-rates=riot io exceed=either tiic specid h ficvdiauIic'or'nutrient Ioadin�'iates; a sc; eduIe-for timing of
applications has been established. required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adiustmeat guidance are
1 Contained -as part -of theplan).
_rf� Name of of Technical Specialist (Please Print}:
Affiliation: C� C� U P4 t
Address(Aae_ncv) 0 ' _ °`1 - Phone ��io.: r9 6', 75' f2 ..
Sienamre: _ _.._ _. _...............: Dace•-: �o !�'�
,k- F (. S
E) Odor. Con trol.-Insect Control.• llforts Iitt--- Tanagerr enf an Esii'e_r errcvVtian;Plan (SDC
SL «`UP. RC or Il
The waste management plan for this facUiry includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Coatroi'
—" Checklist. a -\I rtaliijr-'.Iylanagement-Checklist-and-an-EmerQencvActiort-Plan— Sources- oubott' aol rs and ins'c_ts
have been c%aluated.with respect to this. site and. Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors; and -Best
--management Piadtices to-ContrafFnscets have 6e- selected and'incTtided'in rile vtasie managente:i� plan. Both the
Nlortalit_v_titanageu�e:tt Plan and thGEmergeacy Action. lap are,cotneletcaad ae implemented bptius facility-"-
:..L::_ _ _ -.lea...
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print):_ -�. s �r»r - --�--,.�-_�;_,
Affiliation: _ 5
Address(Agency):
Siariature: " '
F) Written No ice of Nei%, or_Exuandina SN'vine Farm
The rolio%%in- signature block is only to be used for new or expanding smine farms that begin construction after ,Tune
21, 199& If the faciiity µ•as built before"lune 3I. 1996. when -was it constructed or last expanded-
[ fwe) canifv that 1 (we) have attempted to contact by crnitie'd mail all adjoining proper,%. os�ncrs and dl Crorciv owners
who own proprrty located across a public road. sire=t. or highwzy from this ne•.%- or expand:r.2 swine fat:&. Tne notice was in
compliance with the requirer:c:its of NCGS 106-N-4. A =npy of the notice and a list of the :roeem• owners notified is
attached.
Nance of Land Owner :
Si=nature: Date:
\-ante of 1Ianager(if dif;event fro in owner):
Signature
A WC -- ,lanuary I.199
Date:

III. Certification o• f Installation
A) -Collection: Storage;Treatment Installation .• ,� ���,,�fl
d4 crl.. a.= ?G �'pcc ieC� Ch - co ri
_7 _ orretrofitred facilitw(Sl) _.._ . :! .. __..._ C.J
Aai al'wiste sioraic'and-'ireatmenrstructtsres svcii asburhotlitniid-io:lhgoonsand'porids; h�vebe_n insu id in
='aceordaiiccwitiitlicapra�edplattaiiicetpfexcedtiictninirnuarsiandards`anspecificafions = =
ZL
For existing facilities without retrofirs; no certif gtion is necessary.
�� „G�, _., »R.:.�.:i»_ r a��vL►...yrfl.i� "Wori1''JV .'t i+-��'i n_ •.���[��ra �� :iiT
.Name<of Tecchni'caL..peciah_st._(Plea 4e,L t
�dA'ff€ira�i'r►r�;;sszaa.'j�.{'ac',.�j,crmgii:c.� noijt:ilgga.l�sao�ozgi :r.Elo..ic��aszt�s� er::t•:r er.:.a:�::.:�:.c��s . .
=t(FC:::72
�Address(genc�)
- %.] 7 •rylr' :: ''v Lei, ?:1/
S i snatttre:
Clteck_the agpropriateboaC.
-
TFie_ciogpinQ.system.is:in'piaceon alLlaiidas specifed�iri:tile.anirriaL.waste 77.
ariaQementpian.
JJ~ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is clearedforp'lanting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (monthldayfvesr):.the proposed cover crop is appropriate
-• •-. ---for compliance-witirthc wasteutilizarrotr platy_------ -
-- 0 AIsa check this box if appropriate
•••-----------.if--thc crappin,zsystem as specified. in- die' plan- can -not' be established on. newly cleared Iand within 30`days w
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosica control;
Name of -Technical Specialist_(PIease! Print)_
Affiliation:
�lddiess(,_9ency
-Signature` __ ._._... .. - _.. _ ._ : __. - Ddte:::.. _ . _ ..... .
This'foIlti`�iritr signature black.is' onI-vto".be-used when'th -iiaa for conditional 'approral'in III. B
above has-been
I (we) certifytharI-(we),have committed'to establish the'c:mpping~system,as•specifled-in-mv-(our)-Vd� tc.'iin7izau'on planand
if appropriate to estabiislx ifte interim crop,for erosion control. and will submit to DEM. a verification of completion Croai a:
Te.hnical Specialist withirr 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional carufication. [ {we} rCalizc that..;
failure tasub mit.this venficatiart is- a -violation of the. waste-m anagement p[an•and will,subject me (us)-to-arrenforcemeat
action from DEN1.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manazer(if different from owner):
Date:
Signature: Date:
AWC -- Januar-y 1. 1997 �

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Faciliry with exterior lots
- Nleti>ods to rrvnirttizc the ran off.of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specired
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, rib certification'zs necessarv.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print)_"
Affiliation:
tio::-
�i:i.i1.?f_!l 5t!1}oi r—In1.
Staffature. al :.f.3;'J:".t.L.r `:l+ 1st [EiF?tt",t. ?L'(►' r=`Dare.
ig
D} Application and Handling Equipment Installation (-WL-P or I)
Check the apprcpriare block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and adjus:trtent materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as par. of the plan-
Animal wasteapplication and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; rewired buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provider to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has be -cm
purchased and will be on site and installed by (monthldav/v=)-. there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land anpiied in accordance with the
cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the
owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Aaencv): Phone No.:
S ianature: Date:
The following signature biock is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (ire) certify that I (we; have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEyi a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verificadon'is a violation of the waste management plan and «•ill subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DELI.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature- Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and'iortality Management "SD. ST. IY P, RC or T)
til-thods to conrroI cdors and insects a: specifed in the P!aa have bz_n insai]ed and are epe:atierza]_ The
ntortaia prang treat syste-n as scwc::izd in the P!an has also be_m instaile wnd tS oc_rati0rtal.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Punt',':
( .�;•filiation: -
Phone No.:
Si�zn:fture: Date:
A«•C -- jam=ry 1. 1997,

Please return the completed -form-to the Division of.Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment,. Health, and NaturaLResources
Division Of Wa'ter_'Quafity "
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 2953 5
Please also rememben-tosubmit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
`IanaQement Plan to the I0'Eal­S0_iI. and-­Nra-CiFC6 ation'D.istrict-Office-and to keepin
your your Animal."Waste Management Plan.
7 T ", T r, _Z 77
7-.
ANVC January I. V197 6

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston -Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 3, 1997
Swine Farm Company Inc.
Bentonville Sow Farm
PO Box 11047
Goldsboro NC 27532
�EHNR
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Bentonville Sow Farm
Facility Number 51--5
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Swin(
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
W.
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdeslet 1
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, Aw. FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �; An Equal Opportunity/Affirmotive Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B; Howes, Secretary
Swine Farm Company Inc.
Bentonville Sow Farm
PO Box 11047
Goldsboro NC 27532
1:3E9--INR
November 12, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Bentonville Sow Farm
Facility ID#: 51-5
Johnston County
Dear Farm Owner:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerel ,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P,O, Box 27687, F�� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at (919) 5714700. If you need"additional-information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
for AIan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWGI00000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Johnston County Health Department
Johnston County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS510005
NDPU Files

O� W A R Michael F. Easley, Governor
O� QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
co
j Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
'i Division of Water Quality
O �
May 1, 2003
Benton I George Johnson I Massengill
J&M Hog Farm Inc
6341 Strickland Crossroads
Four Oaks NC 27524
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS510005
J&M Hog Farm Inc
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Johnston County
Dear Benton / George Johnson / Massengill:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste Operation. General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on March 6, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Benton /
George Johnson / Massengill, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of
this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS510005 which expired on April
30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the J&M Hog Farm Inc, located in Johnston County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 1600 Farrow to Feeder 240 Gilts swine and the application to land as
specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to
Wean or Farrow to Feeder, operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are
unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced
by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to,ate
conveyunder this ReLWit roe Tights in either real or so eral ro rt . ,+�+m
Nr~']i ER
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

I
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: BENTON JOHNSON
Location: 5110 STRICKLAND CROSS ROADS ROADS
FOUR OAKS NC 27524
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Farrow to Feeder Swine
Number of Animals: 1738.00 sown/�,fiD Sows f'2S�U re,01acemen�q A
(Design capacity) X-g0a -.6 0 ;? ii,5 ~= I738 VV
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or.
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
In the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual. soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not,aliowed
under DEM regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid driflfs a iId
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. if
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Providl ons shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pit in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
"his waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 211 .0217 adopted by the Environmental.
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1738 sows x 7.3 tons waste/sows/year = 12687.4 tons
AMOUNT,OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
1738 sows x 6.5 Ibs PAN/saws/year = 11.297 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2
1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
---------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
8549
1
BnA
BH
8
400
0
20.32
8128
1
APR-SEP
8549 I UN4 GeQ E3H 1406 10 110. 78 4312
fAPR.SEP.
END
:C
/ TOTAL`1 12 4 4 0
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
7-AL Sc fc n r ; /U .5 019 S /f� �'� 1 s �it � r C J) Cl C
r� l.}1C+�'j �� /P�
l i o C��r C E' !'. //I e. I�0 C)44Pk17eeC
i L- � G' � Lr � �T i �/7C %� f � � ��L C� t- � fi J9J 11 �/7ll,.j � r }-�� (�G/ �• �L� 5 c' � � G'
E' r� 1
hf CL
Cri 60 J
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS--
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
- -__
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
8549
]
BnA
BH
7
350
0
20.32
71.1.2
II
1
APR-SEP
8549 �i -- I
SG
l 1 - -1 20.32 11016
016
jl
150 16---
�SEP.APR.
S
se o
f� av-S
t�6
8549 UN4
350 0
jGeD/BH
T
110.7813773
�APR.SEP.
49 --UN4
SG
1 0
I
150 110.781539
I SEP.APR.,,'
%/�i 5 / -S
� � 7'h ///f0•c silo '/Y�i r �
� "el 5
NOTE:
I
TOT� L J I?440
o� 911
-- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interpianted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen. /
%�l C / -y O r? �//' /7 /fI h/ / .� f'/S�[/ Oh xe X "f/y`
Oro 4ucer-, ;V,7e i-o cl'o rPr- 4 &rdsl 7� llmmv /•pw /cccJ'or.o�r p��- � �
5c/�e/J_YlJs ti�v c/ Mu.s f �ro �IVrP jf1F;sc•�/r°/� Qri cz A YPr q c. 7A� ,j o u�'
0 The A L.-KI 19, L ..Z 70 /Jo It 1/4-
I
If
/N�11, c �6" ✓
,s f� ,� � ClU«t- /xe n )ia"; j'a Du���SZe/w��u r 0, Akv e, c�e�c��
i
me7e/ -'ci r
Page: 3

. , I I
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
E
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
557
1
WaB
CO
550
55
0
15
825
MAY-JUN
557 1 WaB 111 140 1110 0 115 1 1200
FEB--MAR
557 1 WaB SB 25 100 0 15 1500
MAY.SEP
END e7l)
/nA� cr1 Ce n 6,1 /6t TOTAL
!91 a x c+ •t 5� e, ,9J /Sz'C' AV /S /i =/co Afr t'r A4
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals. /
/�['�!�'.: J''✓fis ] il'/J 1�I t�� w.5c'c/ 7��,� ��r�o t t"Fr�—
Ae �Sc'cl �1 r-i.:a C. -O 'U .7 cc c C7J' C C !/dJ 44-4e cT
D/r�e /J�C !e S �LJj�41 /S�/31 '!///! 3 G/ /1/ %C� N.Ii. / C`:Je�J( CL
j�J� .I/r fr'r)
,�(Cc��l�� /��r
J r
** Acreage figures may exceed total acre ca, efie in fiel y tie to,6
overseeding. C�
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals to al equired nitrogen
less any commercial. nitrogen (COMM N) supplie?
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE I CROP UNITS PIR UNIT
BH I HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
50
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
CO COTTON
SB SOYBEANS
W WHEAT
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
*I
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND.2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
31.1
12440
* BALANCE
...... '7 CJ nr
POUNDS 1.
BUSHELS 1
BUSHELS 7..
46,
...� __._.Y._.--__,,...
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
10 �e :a 745 7
_ I7C e. 41ell is 4.3 Ixe 41,1
%fib II S Sp vn C a � /gI111 ,'Y1 a LtJr7,�' �C O •� Il/S C/"c� � f�/L4 //4 S � i'P�'�
` IC ! Hb C1u<P�~ rR O if/S / i t° IU / ��+ •'�1 �',ry l� P. a.-:
�j
i/ir' Ai d C li ear c°e✓ GJ vc'c�f7JPn� fA�rY�e� i'o wS
cure/ fit. verQq c� / a j(%��T '� AA-T /U poe- yeo,
Se
/Py e
Paget 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION'PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total.
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached Snap showing the fields to be used for the utilization o!:
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge w.il.l be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1911.8 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 9559
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 31.8633333333 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 76.472 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the .intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial sail moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer'to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly .irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

+ ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide For establishing application
rates and amounts.
I (Application RatelApplic. Amount
Tract l Field l Soil Type I Crop l (in/hr) l (inches)
f I I I __-
557 11 l WaB l Co I .5 l *1
i l i I i
557 l 1 I WaB l SB l .5 l *1
557 l 1 I WaB I W I .5 *1
8549 l 1 l BnA I B11 I .75
(� ccrs
8549 l UH4 I GeD i BH I .35
1�8 i
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the, oil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator.- to
ensure that the spreader. equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables l and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 8

WASTE UTIL17ATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall. not reach surface waters of the stale by
runoff., drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of wast.-te, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is w_i.th.i.n a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but :Less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 —Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be appl.ied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" For guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
- would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 9

P'
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutri-ents shall. not be, applied in fall or. winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
l.eachi.ng. waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited an or after October 1., 1.995 shall.
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the ,Land a,.r.ea
.onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or. river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October. 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips). I
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste snail be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right--of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly .into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
15. Domestic and industrial. waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are :limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 10

WASTFI UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1.8. A animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner isresponsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for, direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will.
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. [poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records, for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 11

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: BEN`I'ONV:I:flLE SOW FARM
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will. follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above.
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
Facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Env:i.ronmental. Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at
the farm office and at the office of the Local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will. be available for review by NCDEM
upon request. ..
Name of Facility Owner: BENTON JOHNSON
(Please print)
11
Signature: Date•-�-��'7
/'et.Av�rev
Name of Manager(If diff ent om owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)Chris W. Smith
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919--989-5381
Address (Agency): 806 North Street
Smithfield NC 27577
,Z
Signature: �yuc Date: `
g �._._ .._..3 GTL7�
f'eU�s�`r Y
Page: 12