420024_PERMIT FILE_20171231

q - 5 ` q
Type of Visit: fQ C fiance Inspection U Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: - /�( rr Arrival Time: Departure Time: ® County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 7&--rf Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
�_�
1
� iW1�.
•
��Z:,.gnts
�,
�:
1w
^�leHf 1 i'` k�
�. �� i �.
�,'r
,.�
�1
�� ?
P �.lYt��, .�.. f!:%A�XI
}li' •
r
`I
�f; i�!
: � 1 a
ir�r '.. .. ,'fr
' � �
L��
WC P
r
�
.. 1 . 1
MEN!
%1
�rrf
�f`,//
rMl�: f -�� q» GI 1
' IM
s� 1 r rr flf+
■
•
��
f� 1
y'.
■
1 1
-0
IV
r�,f
�y,�,
�tta.',r�� , f1�F1W1�
q�f�il t r nr��urla;
1 w }
V
�'
■
� 1
--
f �
f
■
. 1 1 '
--
r
1 r`„
I ..,
: 1
!f1 E I - f �
■
�4
» a..
+ •r
f
==
A
i, {{,r ,o N" ,le..✓, �1
f 1
h71
ail '1�
i ,�
1
1Xt ?� 7 .1
r�+� , .Iff r Y'fP
1, cc��„„
1�11 i1{fl`?�''a
X�
1
�l
, ,/ef�
X��f� �l�'rfrl 11 rff r[h;wil
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (byes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili umber: - 2 1 1 G Date of Inspection: '1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
!(
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environments hreat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ FrozcnGround ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): _ �3p t r� c� 1�P5`C�-2, s1i� g iA 1 a
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [ ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfe ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No. ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Z-- 2 111ate of Inspection: '1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
0 Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
I
S"I k �5 e SILrv-R-\I f(/�o f .3C) 17
i) = S.q I—
r � S'- L(�
ov"I'(L''0" tom- //22/ N +rec)V.P I4V '
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
4 s 6"P'f.
Phone: 7q [ - k/2UD
Date: ?--el "-1 1
214120I S

Divission of Water Resources
Facility Number - �iL Division obSoPand Water fonservation
no Other Agency
f ype of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
%L
Farm Name: 'Jtry (ice Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: �T Title:
Onsite Representative: L41 e_i-K y Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop.
Wet Pouitty Capacity Pop.
�, ,,,ate
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Non -La er
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
qry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr PLoultr,Ca aei P■o P.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
-Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other;
11-1
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ YesrNoo
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ YesNA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412013 Continued

Facilit ''Number: Z - 2­ Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
- Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z ? 2 'op'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
VNoD❑NA ❑NE
NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes;No
No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or t0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Wn^indow ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 130 t A,'4044 re 5 ee.
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
_Required Records _& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
NA
rNo
❑ NE
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
j
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
a ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ YesgNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
[]Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ; ' Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectirNo
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: Z -Z Date of Ins ection
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes �_J N NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes No NA NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes o NA [] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes No NA NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
[] Yes
[] No
NA
NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[] Yes
No
NA
NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
Ej Yes
No
[] NA
NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes
No
NA
❑ NE
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
Yes
No
NA
NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Yes
No
NA
NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes
No
NA
C] NE
Comments (refer to question #)`: Explain any.YManswers and/or -any -additional. recommendatians_oraany other comments. `
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use'additi6nal-pages asinecessary)." a
51102 2 n�uG'6i'1 `- ,6-54,r-r�e� , <U CGr 4-i. � c.t � r1 c�G�� i t
btoC'44t'1-t. 010. C4 Yee
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone
Reviewer/Inspector Signature
Page 3 of 3
Date
_ if-4 ?
21412014

OiTigion of Water Resources
Facility Number Z� - ZC� Division of Soihand Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: O Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine 0 Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 1 �p D _ Departure Time: EZ-7607 County: Region:
Farm Name: S' G�/'� C' Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: a,/ 4 Integrator:
Pbone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Current
Design Current
Design Current
K.Design
Swine Capacity Pop.
WTetPoWultCapacity Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
aoultr,
Ca licit P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
s
jNn-PLayers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Beef FeederBoars
s
Beef Brood Cow
s
Other
Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes VN�o
NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes VNoO
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge'?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: L Z - Z Date of Inspection: —/ 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): /r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 9
No A ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application'? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No [] NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 15ty n.-►t, ey, S n. Qt r ¢ t /7 5r 4 F PSc-P
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
p o NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
rNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
2N NA
[] NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑Yes
���ozoEl NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
El Yes
❑ NA
jNo
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other;
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 2jAo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

l
Facilit Number: Z - Z. 0-jDate of Inspection: - 2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes a ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use�drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
C a ! ebr.5 h'VV\ a- 2. z — (Y
s-1 I v •- (6 -l.i
S^ ✓l t- 5 i nj (-kj - 2p p S! rc N�t 1=o v2 C 6
�r9-�►*- n V J{ y[ ►+�G ' a P d tl i t tG�K i ►�dC .
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: J In S kz_ /C_
Phone:
Date: q ` / 2
Page 3 of 3 21412015

(6 - I s
Type of Visit: V Co ance Inspection (� Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: (., 1? Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Le r L
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Fop.
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pap. Cattle
Layer,- Dairy Cow
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
11
INon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design Current Dry Cow
Dr P,onit . Ca aci P,o . Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other JELILther
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes rNo NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? 5
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o _IA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: Cl- Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in)
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes' ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
KNo
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes a
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
ZNo[:]
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
��i2i i►�Jlti �►TrL _.
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
[:]Yes
NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
W❑
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes NVNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
I8. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: IDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
[] NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
Vo❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
[:]Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
[] NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain:any: YES answers and/or any additional re'commerida"tion`s or'any other, comments.
Use drawin g s'of facility to better explain situations use additional pages as,necessa
n S ► 2
(--� ti-.
CrP i �,c,e c�
%� SM �/
5'joi ! ( O 7 3 o A , r--.
Gk14 il
in fi /uC S.' r f'r e -. #2_0
4 n J k,�- S L[;u,+ 9 I ,r2 G J,
,syk 45jz 5&_lrtie y�3r,kr�0S sYsP �e� ("c�
SuY 5h©wS q �, os �pc/t! 7L ?10
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L7 (.t���L�1
Page 3 of 3
Phone:, j 7 S 1 y Z v
Date: 6) --
21412014

.il
(Type of Visit: Compli a inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: outme Q Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time:
Departure Time: ��D County: Region:
Farm Name:
6
�2n Z_
Owner Email:
Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: ���Liy �. Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pap.
Wet Poultry C►apecity Pop.
Cattle
Capacity Pap.
Wean to Finish
La er
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
1) > P,oult�. Ca aci P■o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Pullets
Beef Feeder
Boars
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turke Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes o No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the.operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesgNo
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

2
Facility Number: L jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes�No
No NA
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ NA
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in);
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes:No
No NA
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental reat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s): r �aA , /yj aj r A •] r f'� S
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
[] YesV❑
NA
0NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 YesfN
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes o
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
2 L Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections dge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑YesVN
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[]Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

• 2-
Facili Number: Date of Inspection: L-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? []Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Coinments,(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any -additional recommendado.ris or any other comments:
Use'draw''- ngs`of facility to'better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
ce—ry�-�y
r
Reviewerhnspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 3(.i S d �•�/�
Page 3 of 3
Phone: -! /9 79 1 2-CO
Date: / 2 ( ^/
21412011

Type of Visit: P Com nce Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: / j Arrival Time: Departure Time: { D County: Region:
Farm Name: S() (a ry- a±: &� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: "
Certified Operator:
Sack -up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
C+urrent
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pap.
Net Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, F,oultr.
Ca acit
l;o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood On —
Turkeys
U_ther
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharses and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Zfj ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Numb-tr: V,/ - ZV- I IDate of Inspection: g9/ /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity {structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall} less than adequate? ❑Yes ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard {in}:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No [DNA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): / &7n w
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�TNo NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[:]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�(No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP [I Checklists [-]Design [-]Maps []Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 ° Rainfall inspection Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili, Number: - Z jDate of Inspection: Q
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes [—]No
❑ NA ❑ NE
DNA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additlonal=recommendations`nr,anyptheir comments.,< ,
-;
lUse drawings of facility to better explain, situations.(use additional pages as necessary). "-
�(k � Sk ✓yfL L�
to-/t'r63
FAA
'"'�} ✓' 2. t � S ,�-� i� � �i�-r r�-�-�' �cT � d � � C� ��--� �Oc�,h ate.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: 79/— `/Zd 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� L ��G•,/� � �
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412011

& 2
Facility Number: - ZC Date of Inspection-, /. /
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes e�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): s;-L
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes EYNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
eff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
EJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
JZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): l�e'7 s...
13. Soil Type(s):
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No .
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
1,7. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�jrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
l9. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [3 Design []Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [3Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

&1Z
Facility Number: Date of Inspection. 2r
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [:]Yes [2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes [:]No
[:]Yes [:]No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question`#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional.. recommendations or any other comments
Use drawingsoffacility to Better explain sitiiitions (use additional pages as necessary)..-=�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: /91` K2 ---�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 6� "54eyr 7FG,/ e, e /
Page 3 of 3
Date: // / 13 2r
21412011

Type of visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of visit: I 46Wr Arrival Time: Departure Time: 1�7� 1 County:
Farm Name: 5 R 6 Eklazz_�/ Z Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ILQ �+Z`►�� Title:
Onsite Representative:
Phone:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
aci I;o P.
Nan-Dai
arrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turke Poults
Other
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
7 ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Eacilit Number: tj Z Date of Inspection: Z
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
�NEl
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
NA
NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental hreat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[—]Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
El Yes
� No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
2J'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ NA
V
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
/No[]
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):f�s--
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Z� ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
/ ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[] Yes
�4)❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis []Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: JDate of inspection: /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon /
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: I%/ i 4-4✓ I7 d S C
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge'? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes la �01:1 NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NI,
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ff): !Explainany` YES answe�s'and/or any additional recomnnendations or'any other eotrimentsijh
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as�necessary).
i�- (P.63
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
T-
2/4/2011

AFT r W
-( 20 '1 t t o __ -_.-
Type of Visit Ocom nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 2 v Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: S & r—A-P_ ,, 6 Z_ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Le ✓✓ i
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ o = , = Longitude: = ° = 1 0
11
Design Current .Design •urr.ent Design Current
opulation Cattle C*apacityPopulation
Swine C*apaare�r�ty Population Wet Poultry Capacity111,
❑ Wean to Finish
IQ Layer
I
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
JEJ Non -La er
I
I
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
ry Poultry❑
D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
a ers❑
❑Non-Dai❑
Farrow to Finish
on -La ersullets
ro
Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
XNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Fieid ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
ElNA
[INE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
ElrNo
[I NA
[I NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
El Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
12/2"4 Continued

(a -Z_.
Facility Number.Z. — Z Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �El NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA El NE
(ie/ urge trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed El o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmentZNo
otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
S. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑YesNA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA El
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (r�fer{�o�questtonp#) Explain,�any�YE�answ,ers�and/or�,�'any�e �o�mmend ions: or any other,commeis#s.
�Tr
�IJ'se drawmgsfaf facilityrto better explaln�situations:�(use�addittonalpages as�nec.essary,):
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,� Phone: Z 0�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: it a_ 70 tje r / Date: 1! ( I
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

6 Z__
Facility Number: Z —2 Date of Inspection I 0
Re aired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes V�r`No NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ElNE
the approprrate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain InspectionZNo,,,E
eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El YesNA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ElNE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ElYes 12 NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesFNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
F "lffiY S Y* �.. !s_., 3Y r k ,-
Additional CnmEitentsansl/arSDrarvings,j:f��l;A,44',>?.,
i +�
_ 4, • l"S ,d ,dl$
�? 4a;,u:�.�
i
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit 16 Co ance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 11Z 1I01 Arrival Time: lib Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: A_ & L S 1061 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ,r // Title:
L
Onsite Representative: /e-
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
�o
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Longitude: = o =' =
Design Current Design Current Design
Current
Swine Capty Population Wet Poultry C*apacity Population C►attle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
10 Laver 1
110
❑ Dairy Cow
El Wean Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer I
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry ❑ D Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Non -Dairy
La ers
❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Beef Stocker
FE]
❑ Gilts Non -La ersPullets El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars ❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
(}ther ❑Turkey Poults
❑ Other ❑ Other Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
e. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes J2<�OONA
1"1F_1 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo [--]-NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Z — Z. L Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes "NoNA [I NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes��No[]] NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity ol'any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [IN E
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El yes I o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ N E
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA [INE
maintenance/ i m provement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or i 0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) �3�r .n S g or
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
O No [INA
ElNE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[3N El NA
El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[]Yes
No El NA
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El
N NA
El
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of facility{tti.better explain
Reviewer/inspector Name Phone: 291 2 t70
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: S - Date: Z ] Q
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number:( —Lf Date of Inspection Z b
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ W P ❑ h kl' ❑ ❑ ❑ h
ec es U C fists Dign Maps Ot er
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ZrNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
NA
"NVE03
❑ NE
24.
Did the facilityfail to calibrate waste application equipment as re required b the permit?
ppq Y
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
7N9,' ❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
,E] NA
C:Ko�No
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
[] Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Rev iewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

ion of Water Quality
Facility Number Z 0 Division of Soil and Water. Conservation r
Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit j04o'utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ® Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: 5 P6 Owner Email:
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
'Other'
10 Other
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = o = Longitude: = ° = 1 =
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
ElTurkex Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes O 1V ❑ NA El NE
El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

1
i
I
i Facility Number: Date of Inspection Zl
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ` No 'n1A ElNE
ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway`?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 ``
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Zf'No A ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required -buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 1.7 e SGGg . 6-mi 5 ��
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
EErIN�No NA
No ❑ NA
No NA
No NA
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/lnspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4_ Date: 1212ZV2
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Z —L
Date of Inspection
Re uired Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
;21�'NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the approprratc box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
ffNo I NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ElNA
ElNE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
ElYes
I o NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No A
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Additional Comments and/or Drawings: 1
12128104

i
H
Facility Number ! Z�
1ivision of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit e_) Co nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 07 ArrivalTimed O S Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: > ''^ [p �� _ s P _ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: I Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = t ❑ 4{ Longitude: ❑ o
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Fa to Feeder
arrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkc Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity" Population`:
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: =
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes LNA El NE
El Yes o ❑ NA El NE
❑ Yes dNq ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number:( Z —Z_
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes "No'NA ❑ NE
[EllYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 OK
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ic/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa -notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 2<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El �❑ NA El NE
maintenance/improvement? �
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El,�
Yes I,�No L7 NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
crAy e�. __-'
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ENo NA
❑ NE
,❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
2rN. ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yeso
El NA
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
[INE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ElYesFNo❑
NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: + r zoo
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��jL� S w~(�� (( Date: ZGIb 7
12128104 Continued

4 ,l
Facility Number: L Z —2 Date of Inspection 2 0
Required Records & Documents
i
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
0<0 NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
❑ Yes
I No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
;Annual
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Certification
PP Y Y Y
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections ❑ eather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ YesfN-
o .` NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yeso/❑
NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fai i to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
R Tl� O ' NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
��NNA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

Type of Visit Q"�Voutine
ante Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason far Visit O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: GG Arrival Time: / Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: �� 1Z �'" G* Z Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Fai -to Feeder
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: [= O = ` � " Longitude: = ° ❑ ` ❑ "
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
I10 Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
i
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifej
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocket
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: E:J
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
El Yes
o NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
ElYes
o P0NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
ElNA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
El NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
ElYes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Z Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ZrNo 'NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ;No/(:]'NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the pen -nit? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �❑NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? ,_ ,
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ElLYes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or t0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
r
12. Crop type(s)— p 5— 43 it rye i
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �, o�❑ NA [I NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes [d' NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes 25o NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
�'4:s �' P.44S�R' � lyn•4 '9e`�1` :�. & �+N4�C e�a1.y`g f*ram �.a' , .. ,, "` ..
Comments referto questions#}Explain)any YES answers andlor3any recommendations ar any other, comments.
i�lC'"516
Use dr�wpgi�ny�gs ofpfacil1ityrto bettertex laintsituatibos: (use additional pages as necessary):
:T1ire41Ri•-&"'._'v..F
''.
Reviewer/inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4.- Date: a
12128104 ' Continued

,.
Facility Number: 4.17-o- 2,Z;;Pf Date of Inspection '� G
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No NA
El NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement'? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections
❑ We er
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
o -NA
ElNE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
o A
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit'?
❑ Yes
��ONA
�No
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No A
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal'?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did R evi ewer/[ nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or.Urawitigs
12128104

Date of Visit: .1��� Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
J Farm Name: z— - Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
JO-Other-
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0 =' = Longitude: = o =
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
I 1� ❑ Non -La er_ .. _ ..
Dry Poultry
0 Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy_Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures: =.
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [ Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
No N
o ❑N
❑ Yes A ❑ NE
❑ Yes A ❑ NE
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NE
El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued
I

Facility Number: 2 — Z
Date of Inspection I 3 tl as-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): f
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed rl
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes L LJ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes 2r.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q<o LJ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat .,notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �No -NA ElNE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [I Yes:No [Ell NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) ,_�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes 2<0 0 NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application �
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need ❑ Yes ,._,�No LJ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [--IPAN > 10% or ] 0 ]bs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s) /-,I r , T
FA
14. Do the receiving crops differ from th+Sse designated in the CAWMP? El Yes -IVA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ;O�
o`NAElNE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,[]YesNA ElNE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes�NNI%k ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name ulii`' : �`,� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3 0 -2
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Z -- Z Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes f�`oEll
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facili fail to conduct a slud a surve as re uired b the ermit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
h' g Y q Y p
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No L A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes N❑ NA El NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document El Yes�No❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �No
o NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes tEl
A El NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes NoA ❑ NE .
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El Yes oA ❑ NE
Rdilittonal Comments "and/or Drawings Y
✓i . CEEi� CL "d"U c✓h e- ry of ! 7 r�J N l� 'IL 5- �`Q
rr II
l 0- 5 , -} a. fj c T C r4- ,n e f-, y � a 4- t,,g-+ '"'4 6 el rM lira P
� may.
12128104

Type of Visit C Complian a Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O utine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other © Denied Access
Fac' 'ty Number Date of Visit: Time:
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
;7ermitted [3 Certtfied [3Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: .... r....�...Ce6..........((........................... County: .... .....`f............................................
OwnerName: ► I.t....�f ..h. .l... Phone No: ............... ........................................................................
MailingAddress:..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
Facility Contact: ....,
Title:
Onsite Representative: ........................................................................................................
Certified Operator: ..........................................
Q.
Location
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: ......................................................................................
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 4 " Longitude ' & «
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
StrucH}re 1 Strum r Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: Y .....
Fecboard (inches):
12112103
❑ Yes • No
❑ Yes p l40
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
Structure 6
Continued

Facility :Number: Z12 — 2. t/ I Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [Plo
seepage, etc.)
6.. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes 2<0
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes o
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type J;�111^ U j 1Aq r - T , h p _Y GA.P /.
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ];
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes FNo
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12112103 Continued

adlityWNurnber: -z c Date of Inspection / o
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall [:]Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
es ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Imo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes L.1'�0
12112103

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit .0--Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit:
rd Permitted ertitiedd 3Conditionally Certified 3 Registered
�1-'� u ` Farm Name: ,85d*otly alrt Q90 4&2
Owner Name:
Mailing Address: 30S
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: po"..
Location of Farm:
Title:
03 Time: sa
rO Not O erational Below Threshold
Date Last Operateo or Above Threshold:
County: mz�e
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: ZZ Y"
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �� _� Du Longitude
Design Current
Design Current
Design . Current
Swine Capacity. Po ulation
Poultry Capacity Pa ulation '-Cattle
act " `Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder I
❑ Layer ❑Dai
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
-El❑
❑ F ow to Feeder
❑ Other
Farrow to Finish 0
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total sSL-W "F
Number of Lagoons g..
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
............... ...._ _.....
❑ S ra Field Area
HoldmgaPonds 1=Solid Traps
❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem
. .
Discharees 8. f Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Colligiction & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? PfSpiilway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: / G
Freeboard (inches): 2_t " LAI
05103101
❑ Yes )Z'No
❑ Yes�No
El Yes �No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ;E No
❑ Yes ,lo
❑ Yes [�Mo
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: t{ Z — Z Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ;dNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an ❑ Yes gNo
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNO
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ZINo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes.No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ElPAN ElHydraulic Overload ElYes No
12. Crop type Slat Coe +
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes Jam-<0
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [:]No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [—]No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes P
9116. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N0
Re wired Records Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal WAn nagement Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.
❑ Yes
ff No
$ f I
ysis
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation,freeboard, t na & sJ11s3m/pre reports)
El Yes
12<0
703
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in clothe time of design?
III
ElYes
0"No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
Z u10 3
❑ Yes
",ONO
22. Pail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by neral Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) lr (>✓0 2 — • 3e
❑ Yes
No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Flo
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
'No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Z No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments(refer to.queshon #) Explatn any YES answ�s:apoloany recommendations,or ariy'nther comments.
Use drawingsof facility to6etter explEain situations. (use,additional pages as necessary) Y teld Copy El Final Notes'
A 1 44w.�°,
W6Lr _� co Z.�o!
nj
� f
CA1to4 wMAA j W;(UALl
Reviewer/Inspector Name;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 9 f 03
05103101 Continued

M
Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
Odar Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the Flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a p'crmanentitemporary cover?
05103101
r
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes ;ErNo
❑ Yes ' lvo
❑ Yes [;'Na
❑ Yes 2<02
❑ Yes r
❑ Yes No
I

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number ,� hate of Visit: Ia D� Time: b-' 0 5
Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
P41ermitted C rtified Cj Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operat d or ove Threshold:
Farm Name: __ Nl %2 County:
Owner Name: i Phone No:
MailingAddress: f71?_�I Ugh_ J D �C.+C4 2a•s !"�
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator: -
Operator Certification Number: %BSI
eErswine []Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 06 Du Longitude Da 4 �K
Design
Swine Ca aci
Current
P,o ulation
WM8111gn Current Design Current
ci P,a ulation Cattle Ca aci P,o ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
1 10 Dairy
❑Non -La er I 1U] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
" Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
FFeeder to Finish
E3Farrow to Wean,
❑ F.gM to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
JD
c:�"
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Salid ',raps
❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Li uid Waste Mana ement S stem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
AP-Lte- Cellection -& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):�„��
05103101
Structure 5
❑ Yes
El Yes EJ-K/o
El.� Yes 'Na
❑ Yesfo
❑ Yes FeKNo
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes [>o
Structure 6
Continued

' Facility Number: Z — Z Date of Inspection 0 4 D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes Xj"No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes 'PNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) ��
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ICJ Yes El No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ON,
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ON,
Waste Auolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,1'No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type 'K L S.
13. Do the receiving crops differ wrth those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes allo
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes �o
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes jTNo
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal ast Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) i ,jl �,�� j 3 i !P ❑ Yes ;?No
8 tqf -.V4 1/6,lot
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, w sty ana��sis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes
20. is facilitynot in compliance with an applicable setback criteria in fe(cat me of of)desi n? p y pp g ❑Yes ,E:rNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ;3<0
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes �fo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes '12<0
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 0
0NNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes Z No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments refer "to uestioir # . Ex lain i6 YES ans '` '4 were and/or an recommi ndahons or ( q ) p y y anyothercomments � ..
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary) % field Copy ❑Final Notes
fiUuLc� /� M q t'7 � r 3 ci j,j k,
g�
/�.c.��1
'I ' i,va� .ems- -b 'Q
_ { .
Reviewer/Inspector Name '51-- 1— LINO
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? TP- C'�dt.
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes *No'
[ o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes FeMoo
El Yes <F
ElYes
El Yes
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
i
05103101

i' ' -- -.J,
€ a 1 s' DIVISIOn of,"Water€Qaahty € a. E € € € 1 r
€� E,, € ;tf ,Ia < € a.•'€€ E€ .¢E e €•i n €� f €€i N l € € i '�t (L)
1 I> 3 k _ E Ir E
1t.A' € 3 ! ; E r E
r C OiAsiotl of Soil -and Water Conserva C a �° ,` [ iit�
OOther,A'}gFnCiy
Type of Visit Q Complia Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit out
Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facil' Number �(1 Bate of Visit: '7 1 U Time: Printed on. 10/26/2000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
94ee'rmitted © Certified [3Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ......� �. .....~ 1.. ..s . 2-..... County:...... ICT I.r`. x...............................................
...... ........... .........
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No:......................................................................................
FacilityContact:..............................................................................Tille:................................................................ Phone No:..............................................:....
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ............................ Integrator ...... lJ,,.P,
Certified Operator: l4 ". L �iL Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm: I
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ��0 ' 16 Longitude • ° it
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity -Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer JEI Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farr to Feeder ❑ Other
arrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars E�l Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
❑ Subsurface Drains Present l❑ Lagoon Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impact's
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated w ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ElOther
a. If' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is ohserved. did it reach Water or the State? (If yes, noliry DWQ)
c. II'discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in g.11/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (ll'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Spray Field Area
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
St' t Ire I Sn•uuture, 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
{(.. ..ro
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes Vo.
Yes
Yes
❑ Yes No
Structu -c 6
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: L./Z—ZG/ I Dateof.Inspection T/1 D printed on: 10/26/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes o
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes Ve,o
❑ Yes No
[]Yes :/No
El Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
Required Records & Documenyi
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewerllnsp� fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facilityXquire a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. WereWry additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 0`5io
❑ Yes ;��o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N
❑ YesjN
❑ YesElYes
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
OJI�o-yi. dgficiend $ vr+ re n tea. dt -ring this:visit;. 'Y:otj *iil.teeoive o furtht'r
corre'soric]teiice: about: thus visit:
Comments (refer'to question #}; Explain any .YES answers and/or any'recommendations or any other comments � , Y 1= 1
Use drawin 5.. a , :
g of facility to t'ette`r`ezplatn sttuatlons. (use addtttoTyal pages as necessary) =6
.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name G s �k2L
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
E -
Date: �_ s/o0

Facility umber: Z — Z Date of Inspection /� o printed on: 10/26/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Aantttonat comments-anaior urawm
P
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes :Zo�
'Yes
❑ Yes
5100

Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Fac' ' Number Date or Inspection
Time of Inspection L f
gj2ffVj 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered 113 Not Operational] Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: c1`tt.✓.A.a..!`�........... county:............ .........?`..........................................
6..z.............................................. � /l
Owner Name:
Facility Contact: .... .goW' v' t a h 7 Title: .........................................................
Mailing Address:
Phone No:
....... Phone No:..,.,
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:............................................................ ..........................
Certified Operator: ,,,1 „�,,,,,,r�k �^,`1,,,,,,,................................„ Operator Certification Number ..........................................
I.............
Location of Farm: `
•
.. .. .......... .. .T
Latitude �' �' " Longitude ' �' �"
Swine ,
Y �
❑ Wean to Feeder
e ❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ F w to Feeder
arrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
`i rl Boars
;Current,i Desygn Current `
y^Po�iulation Poultry Capacity € Population: Ci
, EI Non -Layer I I L.
❑ Other
I
�a
`;' Total Desrgn� C
��� �'�•,�� i�{.,1ota�'
i "� Numberjof LagootisE �° + ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Feld Area
! ; Holden g Ponds'/ Solid Tra ps,o ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il' yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ...............0 ............................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on track
3123/99

Facility Number: Z — Z Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
o
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Oleo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
o
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
o
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
p
12. Crop type rtl � e
{ .je,91-5'
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
Ta
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
2NO
�O
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Ol O
Yes
16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑
Required Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
214o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
{O
20-- Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
ONO-
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0'90
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0
24. Does facilit uire a follow-upvisit b same agency?
Y
❑ Yes
25. W K any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
o
i+*iOlhW js'or dgficj6ncies •w•*rb, pQte 00'ri ft �hjsAsjt: • Yoh Will-tO'iye ijo #'uj•t�gr'
cor'resaotidence: about; this visit: ................................... .

Y
Facility Number: Z -- 7—V Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes —Io
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ YesJ �O
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
El Yes o
es ❑ No
A61

- a ,
.IE Di•
, � , , p♦ot
Sion of Soil and Water Conservation Operation Review it;p�''
Sian-oPSiiil and Water Conservateon ,Compliance Ii4ectrotta
i } f,
sion of Water Quality ! Comphance Inspection { x : S
er Agency operattor ieVieW ' }
€ %r C "�{ t t;'
10 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review O Other
Faci ' y Number bate of Inspection j~ 2
Time of Inspection L! o 0 J 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 13 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered JQ Not O erational Date Lest Operated:
Farm Name: ` i'rJf�s..... ''!}�.!''` �' .... ...... County: ...l. f.'.......................................................
Z�
Owner Name: ,• /f %� /d C '-'L a /f r r Phone No. o
....................af................!�...,............................................................. •............. .....................................�..............................
Facility Contact:V.................................... Title•................................................................ hone No:
..................
iVIailingAddress:D.........Z.'.o.....:L.�................................Z,��...C...b..........,.....,................. ...........,..............
Onsite Representative: .'.:!&4f1<.. e h... r................................................................. Integrator: ` n.-t.- �.�`....`-s............................................
Certified Operator:,.pYV*/� VI C e- T Operator Certification Nutt�ber:..................;................
.I.......... �.........'............................................................
.ocation of Farm: _ �/ 2--
A
........................................................... .............I.—.. "T
Latitude �� �� Longitude
Design Current Desi' n g Current Design' .Current
.Swine Z Capacity Population Poultry. Ca acit Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
;
❑Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish
�1❑
Non -Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
4
Total Msi
13
ETParrow to Finish
o
❑ Gilts,
u
❑ Boars
I
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
i iS i,-t
gn Capacity
TotaI:SSLw
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Laguon Area ❑ Spray held Arca
f �
nds'o❑ No LiqudWaste Management SystemHolhng Po/SlidTraps Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
W C Il ' &T
Yes
No
❑
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
o
❑ Yes
N
rite o ection reatniettt
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
y ct
Freeboard(inches): .......7i.�!!.......................................................................................................................... ...........................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
Structure b
❑ Yes ZNo
Continued on back

Facility Number,'W_ -- Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? 3
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops diffJr witdthose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records &_Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
: 10 yiQlaiiotis'or• dl ficie'ncies were p¢tec3 do' ing 4his'visit:...... receive iti fu>�t�tgr ;
corres• oiidence'. about thss visit:
of facWty tw t!tter.ezalain'situations ,fuse'"additional nap -es.
z5►
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 6 <No
ElYes o
❑ Yes ��No
<
El Yes
� eNo
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes p
❑ Yes 01<0
❑ Yes ZrNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
�s o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0 No
I A-y- Kee �s S �,trU s jpLlG+r c1ti. c4-p �,x Th tier/,r*#7.
W' "'! G►�-�l s 1•-"v�— re.,� {. J�nP �J�' �--�! a►-- ��-b `- %4� r- ion � �w ii/!�(/, i I�[.�`!a �j
U„ro�, l �� be~k� F.'� h Y ��t q��,.�! 101 1�- a� r, .I `�%• +41s is l=+ac, l �7 r'r toenj;
W`-!!""/�('� � �t YaC.,4 � Lk r M re- �'t"- aS � ��tl fO � �9.•� Z`�� Disc.! Z�r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: T/ Z
3/23/99

f
Y. Zy
no

i
A
Facility NumbZ Date of Inspection d
er
Time of Inspectionj�ztd 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered Certified
© Appliedpftfor Permit 1/Permitted 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Narne:��., 'rrij.1J.'S Gi`'� � Zrr............. Cotrnty:.... 7�"r !..,...............................,......,,.,.
OwnerName: ,... .... ..� f'....... .('..........vt...............L...,............................ Phone No:. ... ................/........,...............,...
Facility Contact: i ,l% I `'t t` n �-- ............................. .. Title: ... Phone No: ...................................................
.......................
Mailing Address:.. ........................... ti �/rgQ,,Pi.. `(.�...................................................... ..........................
�•D , 4 b X 12o 114 2-3
............................................................................ .... ..................
Onsite Representative: ... ....1........ T�.. ......................................................... InteKrator:...!/5...........................................
Certified Operator;......... ...............
..1�' G,`� . Operator Certification Number;. [ ...
// ............................ ....................
Location of Fann: < E— l(/ 2---
r...............................................1--,-,,,....:..:.:...................................................11.11.11.1111.11..,1","I",-,,-,,",'l-,'...:_......................,.............................................................................1
Latitude • =' � Longitude 0 =1 11
4Design
Current! �.
'`. `S,Design tCurrent;' Destgm CCurrent
Swore " FCapacity:
PopulationPoultry
Capac�tyPapulation CattlewkCcttyPopulationr�
x
.
El Wean to Feeder
x ❑Layer
FE3Nairy
ElFeeder to Finish
❑ Non Layer on Dairy
El Farrow to Wean
;� t
t ❑ Farr w to Feeder
❑Other
�`
BT arrow to IJinish
Total Design Capacity
,.
❑ Gilts
y
kTotal 's
°;
❑Boars
x 'SSLW
s
i h @.i'C9
Number f Lag / Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
'�`,xNO
No Liquid Waste Management System
m
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, dill it reach Surface Watcr'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
.d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ONo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
. 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes, No
7/25I97 Continued on back

!1
Gw r ro I IS 11_ - -
racility l4umber: 9L -- 2 y
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes \a l
1
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush fits, etc.)
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ) '
Fr�ch�ard (ft); ...........1? . ,......,... ...............................................................................................:........................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures'? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes 'o
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/iml-)rovenient'? ❑ Yes `o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type l�Qr"!''".L,:�1..I... 1...t �}.I.'tj........I............................. -
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No _
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes .2 o
0Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o
. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes o'
22. Does record keeping need improvement? es ❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? Cl Yes ETNo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AW,MP? ❑ Yes 2<0_
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'? ❑ Yes i o
0 No.violations or d'icieneie's.were-noted-during this visit.- Nou.will receive no further
correspondence about this:visit.•
omments`(referto ;.question #): Explain Any YEs answers and/or any recommendations or
se. drawings of facility`to:bettcr explain situations."(use additional pages as necctisary
1`� L' Q� rape O'e,-v7� L
G� ft_j -I ee-.1
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
00,
Reviewer/inspector Signature: nnxv / ,�[/"' Date:

Y
'` F f' ❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
' C] DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine 0 Cona )faint 0 Follow- u) of MV) ins e(-.tion 0 Foliow-upof I)y1VC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number —�
'rime ni' Inspectinn 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Irotal Time (in fraction ut'hours
Farm Status: ® Registered ❑ Applied for Permit lex.1?5 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified [] Permitted. or Inspection r,includes tr.ivel .Ind processing)
[] Not O peratiortal Dale Last Operated: ................................................................................................................................................
Farm Name: ...... C�t.f. ...}.�s....FC>S.?.d.S.... .... ...................................... Count. ......... I............
Owner Name: ....... dal'...1P..1.'. .....F C!JS.............................................................. Phone\o:.....,r...:-� ��......c .1............................ I ............
,,....
Facility Contact: (J r ' .....................
.......!-.V.�.�..'<.a..1Cf��!?.M..f{.0.................. i"itEe:......�ta�si.^...G.....t�..11...............,.,.....,. I'hEfnc• \a:....:�:.I'..tl.`.?..�.,..
Mailing Address: I �................................... ..........................
r
Onstte Representative :........... .. .. .... .(.,.i~t.Lr'.hM..Y................................................ Integrator:.............. ...............
Certified Operator ......... ................... Operator Certification Number:.........�.G: t..`.�..,.,.......
Location of harm:
......C....... A ..... / 1:1.:..15.`.4.... %t... �.%`.� C! S <C"� ' �� .�1.... �.�:?....� !ti...i.1 �..r�...�..�.^..�........ .�. �,. �......................
Latitude F7�70 { ®:' Longitude • 1 -;, 41 11 /` :'
Type of Operation
Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
arrow to Finish
I=EU
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population ° Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy .
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity ..
M -Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons / Holding PondsEL_�❑ Subsurface Drains Present I © Lagoon Area ❑ Spra}' Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need mainten ancelint proventent?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge oritinatcd ar ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. li"dischar e is observed, was the conveyance tnan-niade:'
h. 1fdischarge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, lf'disOiarge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ntin"
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (It ves, notify DNVQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
47
5. Does any part of the: waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
nla I n to p:ut ec/i m p ro�r nt� n t'?
4/30/97
❑ Yes N0
❑ Yes CI'o
n�({ ❑ Yes [XNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No.
❑ Yes 0 0'o
❑ Yes 2<11
Continued on hack

w
Facility Number: —
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ffNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 2'N0
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes QlNo
Structures (Lagoons ansllor I -folding fonds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes C No
Freeboard (ft): Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
........................... ............ ..... ...................... I.......... ...................................... .......... ........................... ,...... ... .............................. .......................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑-,No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes L &o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Q`No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify D"'Q) f�.
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes G l\o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'' ❑ Yes 0 No
(If in excess of WIMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ElYes El];o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Q No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ONo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes [ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 7 , r �. Date. -
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
" Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A'�
DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 19, 1997
Mr. Rudy Grammer
Smithfield Carroll's
P.O. Box 1240
Waverely, Virginia 23890
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 42-24
Carroll's Farm # 62
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
On May 6, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility.
This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to determine
compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that the Swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal. -waste -management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609N%q4F C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

`v
Mr. Rudy Grammer
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
"Operator in Charge". It shall be the responsibility of this
individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the animal
waste management system and to have control over waste application
activities. Currently classes are being held for operators of swine
facilities and training is being developed specifically to address
dairy and liquid poultry operations. For more information please
call either your local Soil and Water Conservation District or
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Q�� 4kTtt-'
Judy Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Mr. Jeff Dillard, Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water
Conservation District ( Halifax County)
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC --- RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
42-24

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
-�-�� Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection,"
Routine 13 Complaint 0 State employee call 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review
Date of Inspection - 6
Facility Number 2- Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: Total Time (in hours) Spent onReNiew Z
or Inspection" (In cludes travel and processing)
Farm Name: (26ffr-Q-t Is IDS - County:
Owner Name: �y''i; `f It f- �/� i'/J� s Phone No: go 0 p
Mailing Address: 90- 0 V 0 y-' 1 Zy 0 fit/( }-,/ t7✓ i— 4"'-fq- 2 31
Onsite representative: ' ! �1 L""t Integrator:
Certified Operator Name:
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
Longitude•
0 Not O eratiortal Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Swine. -`Number Pauitry Number Cattle Number
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
w to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
1310
g Ponds 0 Subsurface Drains Present
Number o Lagao ! Holdia
r
EjLa oon Area 0 Sarav Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes .SNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes d
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ yes NO
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? Of yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 8 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ;-No3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ElYes
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than fram a discharge? ❑ YesS. Does any part of cite waste management system(other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

7; Gid t'tie facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/ 1/97)?
8. A:e there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or_ Jjoldin? Pond
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon � Lasoo�2 t Lagoon 3
zIS' E -3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or anv other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type �.�... %1. -k-.. .... ._ ..... _... �..._ ..... _�. _� ......_ ...
16. Do'the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
13. Does the cover crop need improverent?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Onlv
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes �' o•
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 9'No
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes 0-90
❑ Yes 21 No
❑ Yes 1 'o
❑ Yes ffNo
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes a /
❑ Yes E) N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [I No
❑ Yes ❑ Ne
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Commen#s (refer to questtoti #} :Explain any YES answers an /oranv`reco nmendahons or,aayrarhexcarimments
lice drawings of facility t better exp]Ain sttuatzons . fuse addtitonal pages as necessaryjN
4
�r
Re�,lewenlnspecror Same G
ReviNvenlnspector Signature:
Date:
, c: Division uf' !after Qualin•, Water Ouulirn Section, Facilin• .-assessment Unit 1 i, [ 4%95

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 26, 1996
Mr. Rudy Grammer
Smithfield-Carrolls
P.O. Box 1240
Waverely, Virginia 23890
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Carrolls Farm # 62
Facility # 42-24 SR 1112
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
On August 7, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that this swine facility was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the waste
lagoon had more than the required amount of freeboard. There was a
Waste Utilization Plan onsite and it was determined that records
were being kept to show waste application events. As a result of
this inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge rules.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface
waters of the State are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties and may also result in the loss of deemed permitted
status, requiring immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N4 4F C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 500/6 recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Carrolls # 62
Page 2
The General Assembly recently passed Senate Bill 1217 which will
require all animal waste management systems to designate an
" Operator in Responsible Charge". It shall be the responsibility
of this individual to oversee the operation and maintenance of the
animal waste management system and to have control over waste
application activities. Currently classes are being held for
operators of swine facilities and training- is being developed
specifically to address dairy and liquid poultry operations. For
more information please call either your local Soil and Water
Conservation District or Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District (Halifax)
Steve Bennett --Regional Coordinator, DSWC
RRO File Copy

SMITH FIELD-CARRQLUS FARMS
P.O. Box 1240
WAVERLY, VIRGINIA 23890
August 31, 1995
Mr. Kenneth Schuster
DEHNR; Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive; Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
RE: Management Deficiency Notification, Smithfield-Carroll's Farms #62; Halifax,
County SR It 12
Dear Mr. Schuster:
M
s
r•,
C�7
i
T
I n��
I am in receipt of your letter of August 23, 1995, regarding the recent compliance
inspection by your office. The deficiency reported by the inspection consisted of leaking
clean -outs behind the confinement buildings.
I am able to report to you that the pipe fitting's at this location have been inspected by
the maintenance staff, and the damaged fitting has already been repaired.
I trust this information is sufficient for the required written response. However, should
you require additional information, I may be reached at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ru y Grammer
Manager of Farming &
Environmental Affairs
cc: Adolph Miller, Carroll's Foods of Va., Inc.
John Carter, Carroll's Foods of Va., Inc.

1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources + LT.
Raleigh Regional Office
Ova
James B. Hunt, ,Secreta[D E H N
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
August 23, 1995
Mr. Rudy Grammer
Smithfield-Carrolls
P.O. Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Smithfield-Carrolls Farm # 62
Halifax County SR 1112
Dear Mr. Grammer:
On July 25, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to
determine potential problems associated with animal waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Toweli's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state,
nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiencies were observed:
Evidence of small amounts of waste from leaking clean -outs
located behind the containment buildings were noted in the
road side ditch. During rainfall events this waste could enter
adjacent lowland areas.
In addition to continued facility waste management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office
will require a written response to the aforementioned issues
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. You should specifically
address how you plan to correct this problem and submit a schedule
(with dates) stating when these management deficiencies will be
corrected.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 6M recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Carrolls # 52 Hog Farm
Page 2
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges to surface waters of the State are
subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day, and may also
result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring immediate
submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take the opportunity to remind
you that you are requirec!l to have an approved animal _waste
management plan by December,1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. if you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Fishing Creek Conservation District {Halifax County}
Steve Bennett --Regional Coordinator, DSWC

Facility Number:
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date:-.,'- I r -�e
Time: 12 `/
General Information:
Farm Name: C14rrt2 //_S Z -- _ -- County: ►' /- y
Owner Name: C r-/lS l 1,W • Phole 1 o:_aj L/a 7_,
On Site Representative: Z,44A lZ� Y _ Integrator: GYq rry //S
Mailing Address: • o B o x/ 2- y A_
�.vaU�z3�g U
Physical Address/Location:_ _S-/ ///
Latitude:/ I Lon itude: 1 I
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
ow 1p 0A) ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Nursery ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
a6;der $`D 00
OrherType of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons:include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
L
Facility_ Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than I foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes ❑ No
Is seepage observed from the Iagoon?: Yes ❑ No C <
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑ No CCa'
Is any discharge observed? Yes ❑ No
0 Man-made ❑ Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑ No ❑
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
{ list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type:__ Acreage: 3 S
Setback Criteria f
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application? Yes ❑ No �J
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application? Yes ❑ No
Is animaI waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No i�
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No
AOI -- January 17,1996

Maintenance /
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes ❑ — No �
Is there evidence -of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑ No Cd'
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes or --No ❑
Explain any Yes answers:. (, hS- e a-1: ! Zg 4 . v► 0 4fh h y
I�SW C h d � try 5s • � a . T,
Signature: C Date: e ? - 94�
cc. Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed
Drawings or Qbservations:
AOI -- January 17,1996

_7;_^a�a.'�JUL—i4--1955 15:2b FROM
DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
.,-� .
RRO P.02iO2
" Site Requires Immediate _A�ttendon- /
Facility No. 412- 7-5'
DIVISION OF ENVIRONNffiNTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL, FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE. VISITATION RECORD
DATE: _7 ` Z 5 — , 1995
Time: / f7 ° D
Farm Name/awn(
Mailing.Address:
County: i /f
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: 14?1-r t] /, Phone: 01-5 ` 3 ` 9 3
Physical Address/Location: ?9�// �
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: (" a a S 41,, 4 _ Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification- Number: ACNEW
Latitude: -3 6 ' C_ 6 _' Longitude: _? - 33 4 ' Z�" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon ha;70r
fficienr. freeboard- of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approxirnately 1 Foot -+- 7 inches) No Actual Freeboard: -, Z__Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? 7 Eo s or(p Was any erosion observed? Yes o
Is adequate laud available for spray? Yes or No ) Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Gar No
100 Feet from Wells? Nor No
_�e arimal waste- stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue. Li ne S trcam? Yes <3N
x mal waste land applied.or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes oCD
a
Ts animal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-(Wade ditch, flushing. system, or tither
6mi;ar man-matde devices? Yes oK91- if Yes. Please- Explain.
►+.�c5 the facility ittaiatain adequate waste mattageruent records (volumes of ruanure; land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)?0�5s.br No
Additional comments: L<- CtiAe,
'-F a A.// _ d�j w�_e2_!'�.F S i� Q- � o <S' �S'-1.� // ���-•ow�..� Jd�-
ature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P,O2

,TUL-1 �-199� 15 � 2b FROM DEP1 WATER QUALITY SECTION TO �
RRO P. 02i02
4 /
Site Requires Immediate xtterinor.,
Facility No. '-/
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT"
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7 - Z S , 1995
Time: / C7 ° D
Farm Name/Owner_ / f r ram►'-- ZZI,� -2--
Mailing Address: 7;_ D !? �/y.!`�y //
County- i
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: 41eJ �V A� Phone: 1161
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: C, Saw s' Number of Animals on Site; z L
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM_ Cerdfiication Number-. ACNEW
Ladrud.e: -3 6 ' r 6 Longitude: ? 3 4 Elevation: _____--_Feet
Circle Yea or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon haU0,XT
cient freeboard of L Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) No Actual Freeboard: _,•�Ft. Inches
Was. any seepage observed from the iagoon(s)? Yes or o Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: Co - - c-,-j 4 U%,-
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 'e or No
100 Feet from Wells? L e or No
:ne arimal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o f
'; animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feer of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes orb
'; animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
.;ir^ilar rnan-made devices? Yes or If Yes, Please Explain.
.Aa CS MC Fatality maintain adequate waste tuauagerncar records (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)'? No
Additional Comments: 17 b e t�47,f k/-
_Vv\\5 rung �- �� � =,��,�-�v,Ls r e, rd.,, r
Si ature - -
cc: Facility Assessmtmt Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

`.0 W A TF9P
�O G
• O 'C
Smithfield Carroll's Farms
Farm 62
385 Highway 158
Roanoke Rapids NC 27870
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS420024
Farm 62
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Halifax County
Dear Smithfield Carroll's Farms:
On April 28, 2003, .the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date -of the Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG100000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 13, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
• of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to
Smithfield Carroll's Farms, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of
this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS420024 which expired on April
30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Farm 62, located in Halifax County, with an animal capacity of no greater than
an annual average of 500 Farrow to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in the facility's
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder
operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary, they may be
replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts
for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004'. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary.. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
. The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to to
under this hermit convey,ajjv property rights in either real or personal property.
IN
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http:Nh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone 1-B77-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit .
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS420024
NDPU Files
is

Murphy -Brown, LLC 4/17102
0 NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s): NPD (USA)
Farm Name: NPD (USA) Farm 62
County: Halifax
Farm Ca acit
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 500
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Anaerobic Lagoon
>180 days
Irrigation
2622 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 26398
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required, for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
• Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
•
1 of 8

• This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
L I
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility, In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.):
Capacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gal/yr
gal/yr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gaVyr
gal/yr
500
Farrow to Finish
10585 gal/yr
5,292.500 gal/yr
Wean to Feeder
223 gal/yr
galtyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gal/yr
gal/yr
Total 5,292,500 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibstyr
Ibstyr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
Ibstyr
500
Farrow to Finish
26 Ibs/yr
13,000 Ibstyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 ibs/yr
Ibstyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibslyr
lbs/yr
Total 13,000 lbslyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 23.89
Total N Required 1st Year: 7764.25
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 7,764.25
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 5,465.00 `
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (2,299.25)
" See Additional Comments, Page
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2 of 8

NEEMM
3(a) of 8

•
•
r1
This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code Crop
A Barley
B Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D Corn - Grain
E Corn - Silage
F Cotton
G Fescue - Grazed
H Fescue - Hay
I Oats
J Rye
K Small Grain - Grazed
L Small Grain - Hay
M Grain Sorghum
N Wheat
O Soybean
P Pine Trees
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
1.6 lbs N / bushel
50 lbs N / ton
50 lbs N / ton
1.25 lbs N 1 bushel
12 lbs N / ton
0.12 lbs N 1 lbs lint
50 lbs N / ton
50 lbs N / ton
1.3 ibs N 1 bushel
2.4 lbs N / bushel
50 lbs N 1 acre
50 lbs N 1 acre
2.5 lbs N / cwt
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
4.0 lbs N 1 bushel
40 lbs N 1 acre I yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4 of 8

. SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PANT r/animal Farm Totall r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
Farrow to Feeder 1
500 Farrow to Finish 4.1 2050
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 2050 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 10250 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 34 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 82 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
• APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
"This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
• Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8

Application Rate Guide
• The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract
Hydrant
Type
Crop
inlhr
" inches
1291
1A
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1291
16
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1291
2A
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1291
2B
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1291
3
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1291
4A
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1291
4B
Gritney
C
0.5
1
n
LJ
6 of 8

• Additional Comments:
The Amounts of Waste and Plant Available Nitrogen Produced per year as
shown in the tables on page 2 are the typical amounts that are used in the
absence of actual "On -Farm" records. However, site specific historical data
from 1998-2000 was used to determine the average amounts of Waste and
Plant Available Nitrogen produced at this facility.
The Average Volume of Wastewater Applied: 6,071,500 gal/year.
The Average Plant Available Nitrogen Produced: 5,465 Ibslyear.
See the attached documentation for the calculations of the above numbers.
The owner may choose not to plant the small grain cover crop on any or all of
the wetted acreage if desired. This option should be used only if there is
sufficient storage available in the lagoons to store the amount of waste and
• rainfall that will be added from Oct -Feb.
•
7 of 8

0 NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: NPD (USA) Farm 62
Owner: NPD (USA)
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
- according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
• Name of Facility Owner: NPD (USA)
Signature:
Date
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Date
Name of Technical Specialist: M. Kevin Weston
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC. _
Address: 2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone: [phone]
Signature:
•
8of8

Nr
QIF-
RIMV

e-�' 5 6� �
Murphy -Brown, LLC
4/22/2005
2822 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s): Murphy -Brown, LLC
Farm Name: SPG Farm 62
County: Halifax "'r
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Wean to Feeder
500
Feeder to Finish
/
Storage Structure:
Anaerobic Lagoon
Storage Period:
>180 days
Application Method:
Irrigation
`
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 1 SA NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, A tons, etc.):
Capacity -Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gallyr
gallyr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
gallyr
500
Farrow to Finish
10585 gallyr
5,292,500 gallyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gallyr
Feeder to Finish
986 all rgal/yr
Total 5,292,500 gall r
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (Ibs): *based on site specific data
Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibs/yr
Ibslyr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
500
Farrow to Finish
10.93 Ibslyr
5,465 Ibslyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibsl r
Ibsl r
Total 5,465 Ibs! r
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 58.99
Total N Required 1st Year: 14551.75
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 14,551.75
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 5,465.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (9,086,76)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2of8

Tract Reid Inigated _, !3
3(o) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE. LEGEND
Crop Code Crop
A Barley
B Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D Corn - Grain
E Corn - Silage
F Cotton
G Fescue- Grazed
H Fescue- Hay
I Oats
J Rye
K Small Grain - Grazed
L Small Grain - Hay
M Grain Sorghum
N Wheat
O Soybean
P Pine Trees
Lbs N utilized 1 unit yield
1.6 lbs N 1 bushel
50 lbs N 1 ton
50 lbs N 1 ton
1.25 lbs N 1 bushel
12 lbs N 1 ton
0.12 lbs N / lbs lint
50 lbs N 1 ton
50 lbs N / ton
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
50 lbs N 1 acre
50 lbs N 1 acre
2.5 lbs N 1 cwt
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
4.0 lbs N 1 bushel
40 lbs N 1 acre 1 yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4of8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications PANT danimal Farm Totall r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
Farrow to Feeder 1
500 Farrow to Finish 4.1 2050
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 2050 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 10250 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 34 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 82 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
"This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in .
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract
Hydrant
Type
Crop
inthr
" inches
1291
1A
Gritney
C
T 0.5
1
1 B
Gritney
C
0.5
1
2A
Gritney
C
0.5
1
28
Gritney
C
0.5
1
3
Gritney
C
0.5
1
4A
Gritney
C
0.5
1
4B
Gdtney
C
0.5
1
Reid Lease
5A
Gritney
H
0.5
1
5B
Gritney
H
0.5
1
6A
Gritney
H
0.5
1
6B
Gritney
H
0.5
1
7
Gritney
H
0.5
1
8A
Grftney
H
0.5
1
813
Gritney
H
0.5
1
9A
Gritney
H
0.5
1
9B
Gritney
H
0.5
1
10
Gdtney
H
0.5
1
1291
Sub1
Gritney
C
0.5
1
Reid Lease
sub2
Gritney
H
0.5
1
6 of 8

Additional Comments:
The acreage listed on this plan as subfields is the balance of the total
field acreage minus the wet acres at this site. This acreage will be
claimed when making application with an aerway machine. This acreage
is optional for this plan.
7of8

04127-2005 10:51 SPG 2524452695 PAGE2
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAIN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: SPC Farm tip
Owner. Murphy -Brown, LLC
Mana>sger.
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. 1/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
t/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily inigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will oe applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be tiled on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner. Mur h -Brown LLC
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist:
Dawn Williamson
Affiliation•
Murphy -Brown, LLC.
Address:
...2825 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856
Warsaw,, NC 28398
Telephone:.
_.
[phone] ....
Signatures:
.- 2, G�—O

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recievinq crop type, or available land.
3 Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5 Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7 Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such'that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3of3

F a rm 7 �
Scale: 1 "=3(
offset
Wells w
Lagoon

F ,aK_n\ Cz
NORTH CAROLINA
FARM LEASE AGREEMENT
HALIFAX COUNTY
THIS FARM LEASE AGREEMENT made and entered into this the loth day of December
2003, by and between ALICE PARTIN REID (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), 218 King George
Road, Greenville, NC 27858; and MURPHY-BROWN, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Tenant"),
2822 Hwy. 24/50 West, Warsaw, NC 28398.
WHERAS, Owner is the owner of certain lands, Premises and improvements designated on
the attached aerial photograph identified as Exhibit A — Tax Parcel 04-02102; containing 94 acres
more or less.
AND WHEREAS, Tenant desires to farm the approximately 35 acres of cleared land and
install an eight inch PVC pipeline across Owner's property and to bury the same approximately four
feet underground to transfer waste waste and effluent from the adjoining swine facility to designated
spray fields. Tenant also desires to lease the remaining wooded land to maintain exclusive hunting
rights during the leased period.
(
AND WHEREAS, Owner and Tenant have negotiated such terms, conditions and stipulations
and now desire to memorialize the same as established by the terms, conditions and stipulations as
hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the Premises, the sum of Ten Dollars
($10.00) in hand paid to each party by the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby is
acknowledged and by the mutual promises, covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties
hereby do hereby covenant, stipulate and agree as follows:
1. TERM OF THE LEASE: The initial term of this Lease shall be for a period of ten (10)
years commencing the 1.Oth day of December, 2003 (the "Inception Date"), and ending the
31 st day of December, 2013.
2. INITIAL TERM RENT FOR CROPLAND: Tenant shall pay to Owner rent for the
initial term of ten years, $16,800.00, due and payable as follows:
a. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2004.
b. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2005.
c. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2006.
d. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2007.
e. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2008
f. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2009
g. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2010
h. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2011
i. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2012
j. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2013

3. INITIAL TERM RENT FOR HUNTING RIGHTS: Tenant shall pay to Owner rent for
the initial term of five years, $6000.00, for the exclusive rights for ingress and
regress to all land and the hunting rights for all non cropland, for the first five years of this
lease, such payment will be due and payable as follows:
a. The Sum of $1,200.00 due and payable on or before December 1, 2004.
b. The Sum of $1,200.00 due and payable on or before December 1, 2005.
c. The Sum of $1,200.00 due and payable on or before December 1, 2006.
d. The Sum of $1,200.00 due and payable on or before December 1, 2007.
e. The Sum of $1,200.00 due and payable on or before December 1, 2008.
4. RIGHT TO RENEGIOTIATE THE HUNTING RIGHTS: Owner reserves the right to
renegotiate the annual hunting rights at the end of the first five-year term. At the end of the
first five-year term both parties will have the right to renegotiate the payment and terms of
any additional or further hunting rights for the non -cropland. Tenant shall retain all
hunting right for the cleared land during the ten-year farm lease agreement.
5. ENVIRONMENTAL: Tenant shall not permit, allow, or cause any act to be performed or
Any practice to be adapted or followed in and about the Premises which shall cause or be
likely to cause injury or damage to any person or to said Premises or to other property or
any persons. In no case shall Tenant cause or allow waste water effluent to be discharged
or released onto Premises. In addition to Owner's other remedies, Tenant agrees to
indemnify and hold Owner harmless from against any and all loss, liabilities, damages,
injuries, interest, deficiencies, fines, penalties, costs, expenses attorney(s)' fees and costs of
investigation and clean up including, without limitation, to claims, suits and proceeding by
Federal, State, County and local governmental authorities with respect to, or as a direct or
indirect result of the presence on or under, or the escape, seepage, leakage, spillage,
discharge, emission, discharging or releasing from, the property any wastewater effluent, if
such occurs, during the term of this Lease or during any extended period. -
6. STRUCTURAL CHANGES: Tenant shall not construct any additional improvements
Upon the Premises except the underground pipeline. At the expiration of the tern of this
Lease, upon demand by Owner, Tenant, at Tennant's sole cost and expense, shall remove
all underground equipment placed upon the Premises by Tenant, including, but not limited
to underground pipes. At the option of Owner, at the expiration of the term of this Lease or
earlier termination, Owner may retain all underground pipelines on the Premises, in which
event all underground piping shall become the property of Owner.
7. PROPERTY TAXES: Owner will be responsible for all county and state property taxes
due on the property.
8. ASSIGNMENT AND SELLING OF PREMISES: Tenant shall have the right to assign
This lease or the sublet the Lease. Owner shall have full authority to assign this lease, to
mortgage, lease or sell his property. Tenant agrees to subordinate this Lease to such
mortgage, lease or sale.
9. MEMORANDUM OF LEASE: Owner agrees to sign, for recording at the Halifax County
Courthouse, a Memorandum of Lease.

10. BINDING EFFECT: This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs,
assigns, personal representatives and successors in interest. This Agreement may be
executed in one or more counterparts each of which shall be deemed to be an original.
AGREED to this the 10`h day of December, 2003.
dC.lzz' (SEAL}
Alice Partin Reid, Owner/
Murphy-Btowft LLC, Tenant
NORTH CAROLINA
PITT COUNTY
I, a Notary Public of Pitt County, North Carolina, do hereby certify that ALICE PARTIN
REID, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing
LEASE for the purpose therein expressed. Witness my hand and notaries seal this _L day of
December 2003, My commission expires: � 13 r-)�G07
(Notary Seal)
tary P is
NORTH CAROLINA
fflo&iA COUNTY
h,Yoi� W�slerbeel�
I, a Notary Public of Duplin County, North Carolina, do hereby certify that MAW, a
manager of MURPHY-BROWN, LLC personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the
due execution of the foregoing LEASE for the purpose therein expressed. Witness my hand and
notaries seal this AIN _day of December 2003. My commission expires: QC4 + (S, -Xa .
! (Notary Seal) .
Notary Public

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B: Howes, Secretary
Smithfield Carroll's Farms
Farm 62
PO Box 1240
Waverly Va 23890
e��
[:)EHNR
November 12, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator in Charge Designation
Facility: Farm 62
Facility ID#: 42-24
Halifax County
Dear Farm Owner:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the BIue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date, Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,/ j
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. ., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
�W
P.O. Box 27687, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 Nvf An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number q L -
Farm Name: l-v 1:5 6 7
On -Site Representative: 96vik, &9-, ---
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: 7,gw e. i/
Date of site visit: S:fz2- /Illy
Date of most recent WUP 2 - `j G
Annual farm PAN deficit: 3 213pounds
Operation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) Fl F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P9 P2 P3
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
Ell Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D21D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule, exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part II. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in overapplication of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to.deduct required .
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres fortravelers-orless than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

Revised April 20, 1999
acility Number � Z. - G-
Part III. Field
by Field Determination of
75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'.2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
ce,p fob
-7
i
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pendin Determinations
,A,ds ` ae x5.
Pi Plan. lacks fallowing information: 4me �,� wy� w J l�
P2 Plan revision may satisfy 75% rule based on adequate overall PAN deficit and by
adjusting all field acreage to below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ie/in process of installing new irrigation system):

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Smithfield arro 's arms
Farm 62
PO Box 1240
Waverly Va 23890
Farm Number. 42 - 24
Dear Smithfield Carroll's Farms:
April 17, 1998
\goy
You are hereby notified that Farm 62, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC,,must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this Ietter, your farm has sixty (60) days to
submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995
Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an
application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system
after the specified date. Your application must be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter.
Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other
enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste
Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please
make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The signed original
application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application package. The completed
package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Mike Lewandowski at [phone]
extension 362 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone],
Sincerely,
,,f:,,,A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer- 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Murphy -Brown, LLC 4/17/02 2822 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s):
NPD (USA)
Farm Name:
NPD (USA) Farm 62
County:
Halifax
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
500
I
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
1
Storage Structure:
Anaerobic Lagoon
Storage Period:
>180 days
' 4
Application Method:
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used r
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
34 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above, If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.):
Ca aci Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 galtyr
galtyr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 galtyr
galtyr
500
Farrow to Finish
10585 galtyr
5,292,500 gaityr
Wean to Feeder
223 galtyr
galtyr
Feeder to Finish
986 galtyr
galtyr
Total 5,292,500 galtyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
Capacity Type Nitro en Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibstyr
Ibstyr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibstyr
Ibstyr
500
Farrow to Finish
26 Ibstyr
13,000 Ibstyr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibstyr
Ibstyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 ibs/yr
Ibstyr
Total 13,000 Ibstyr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have approprlate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 23.89
Total N Required 1 st Year: 7764.25
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 7,764.25
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 5,465.00 "
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (2,299.25)
" See Additional Comments, Page
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2 of 8

Reception Area Specifications
3(a) of 8
3(a) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer, The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches, Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall,
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code Crop
A Barley
B Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D Corn - Grain
E Corn - Silage
F Cotton
G Fescue - Grazed
H Fescue - Hay
I Oats
J Rye
K Small Grain - Grazed
L -Small Grain - Hay
M Grain Sorghum
N Wheat
O Soybean
P Pine Trees
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
1.6 Ibs N / bushel
50 Ibs N / ton
50 Ibs N / ton
1.25 Ibs N 1 bushel
12 Ibs N / ton
0.12 Ibs N / Ibs lint
50 Ibs N I ton
50 Ibs N / ton
1.3 Ibs N / bushel
2.4 Ibs N / bushel
50 Ibs N I acre
50 Ibs N 1 acre
2.5 Ibs N / cwt
2.4 Ibs N / bushel
4.0 Ibs N / bushel
40 Ibs N / acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste,
4of8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Spec ifications PANT rlanimal Farm Totall r
Farrow to Wean 0.84
Farrow to Feeder 1
500 Farrow to Finish 4.1 2050
Wean to Feeder 0.072
Feeder to Finish 0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 2050 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years,°you will have approximately 10250 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 34 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 82 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
*This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract _
Hydrant
Type
Crop
inlhr
" inches
1291
1A
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1291
1 B
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1291
2A
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1291
2B
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1291
3
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1291
4A
Gritney
C
0.5
1
1291
4B
Gritney
C
0.5
1
6of8

Additional Comments:
The Amounts of Waste and Plant Available Nitrogen Produced per year as
shown in the tables on page 2 are the typical amounts that are used in the
absence of actual "On -Farm" records. However, site specific historical data
from 1998-2000 was used to determine the average amounts of Waste and
Plant Available Nitrogen Rroduced at this facility.
The Average Volume of Wastewater Applied: 6,071,600 gal/year.
The Average Plant Available Nitrogen Produced: 5,465 Ibsl ear.
see the attached documentation for the calculations of the above numbers.
The owner may choose not to plant the small grain cover crop on any or all of
the wetted acreage if desired. This option should be used only if there is
sufficient storage available in the lagoons to store the amount of waste and
rainfall that will be added from Oct -Feb.
7of8

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: NPD (USA) Farm 62
Owner: NPD (USA)
Manager:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. I/we know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
I/we understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in.this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: NPD (USA)
Signature:
Date
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist: M. Kevin Weston
Affiliation: Murphy -Brown, LLC.
Address: — 2822 Hwy 24 West O Drawer — - ------ _ , Pawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Telephone--_______ (910)_ 293-3434
Signature:
Date
r
8 of 8

Smithfield-Carroll's Farms (dba NPD-USA)
Lagoon Analyses for Farm 62 Secondary Lagoon
Actual lagoon analyses, 1998-2000. Data from NCDA, Agronomic Division Lab
MonthNear
Lagoon 62S
PAN/1000 gal
Feb-98
1.50
Apr-98
1.50
Jun-98
0 6
M.Q
Aug-98
6
Oct-98
l ii4.
Feb-99
�1y2
Apr-99
,; Q 86,
Jun-99
A
0:93;
Aug-99
- 0'1. �.
Oct-99
sQk
K
Dec-99
Q�9'
Feb-00'1.
Apr-00
-1a!
Jun-00
049AI 3 "
Aug-00
0 64,
Oct-00
0.23
Lagoon Averagel
0.94
Farm Average 1
0.94
Std. Deviation = .48 x avg. PAN
Std. Deviation = .48 x .94 #11000 gal
Std. Deviation = .45 #/1000 gal
Range = .94 + .45 #11000 gal
Range = .49 to 1.39 #11000 gal (Shaded)
Revised avg.= .90 # PAN11000 gal
fro M11f:7ai• = ►hill►►►M- FM - A 17tw_v
Year Year 1000 gal
Total PA = :1�+r4j&iiIiLM X 6I+>AI7OM
Year Year 000 ._
o�p = 5,465 lbs.
Year
SPAN/1000 gal.
#PAN/1000 gal.
Annual Wastewater Applicat'ionrSummary
Total Wastewater ADPlied Per Year
Year
Total Gallons
1996
7,633,875
1997
5,691,750
1998
9,871,200
1999*
4,272,000
2000*
4,071,300
Avg.1996-2000
6,308,025
Avg.1998-2000
6,071,500
*Water Reduction Strategies in Place
*Water Reduction Strategies in Place
NCCES Publication AG-439-42 Requires 3 years data to modify CAWMP site specific

Smithfield-Carroll's Farms
Lagoon Analyses for Halifax County Farms
Farm 62 Data from North Carolina DeparhentofAgricultureAgronamic0ivision
Date
Lagoon
Laboratory Results
TKN P K
m m m
Ibs.11000
Nutrients Available for First Crop
N P205 K20
al. Ibs.11000 al. lbs.11000 at.
Nitrogen
Reduction
%
Apr-93
62P
500
100
400
2.00
1.43
3,00
62S
300
0
100
1.20
0.00
0.75
40.00
Apr-94
62P
700
100
600
2.80
1.43
4.50
62S
300
100
400
1.20
1.43
3.00
57.14
Apr-95
62P
800
100
700
3.20
1.43
5.25
62S
400
100
500
1.60
1.43
3.75
50.00
Sep-95
62P
427
100
610
1.60
1.30
4.90
62S
126
95.7
630
0.47
1.30
5.10
70.63
Apr-96
62P
602
' 92.9
497
2.30
1.20
4,00
62S
399
173
447
1.50
2.30
3.60
34.78
Sep-96
62P
826
446
675
3.10
6.00
5.40
62S
217
113
642
0.81
1.50
5.10
73.87
Apr-97
62P
756
56.2
608
2.80
0.75
4.90
62S
476
43.8
551
1.80
0.59
4.40
35.71
Jun-97
62P
777
79.2
613
2.90
1.10
4.90
62S
336
73.3
587
1.30
0.98
4.70
55.17
Sep-97
62P
497
105
688
1.90
1,40
5.50
62S
42
69.4
676
0.16
0.93
5.40
91 M
Feb-08
62P
665
93.3
605
2.50
1.30
4.80
625
392
67
614
1.50
0.90
4.90
40.00
Apr-98
62P
595
114
606
2,50
1.50
4.90
62S
357
61.2
550
1.50
0.82
4.40
40,00
Jun-98
62P
553
76.2
592
2.30
1.00
4.70
62S
147
57.3
589
0.61
077
4.70
73.48
Aug-98
62P
477
88.2
640
2.00
1.20
5.10
62S
157
72.0
644
0.65
r 0.96
5.20
67.50
Oct-98
62P
523
85.7
625
2.20
1,20
5.00
62S
237
74.4
642
0.99
0.99
5.10
55.00
Feb-99
62P
644
82.1
620
2.70
1.10
5.00
62S
280
56.5
543
1.20
0.76
4.40
55.56
Apr-99
62P
576
84.7
574
2.40
1.10
4.60
62S
205
43.1
554
0.86
0.58
4,40
64.17
Jun-99
62P
628
83.3
676
2.60
1.10
7.00
62S
224
63.1
737
0.93
0.84
5.90
64.23
Aug-99
62P
532
93.1
730
2.20
1.20
5.80
62S
187
77.1
748
0.78
1,00
6.00
64.55
Oct-99
62P
289
61.5
423
1.2
0.82
3.40
62S
141
48.6
467
0.59
0.65
3.70
50.83
Dec-99
62P
458
86.7
670
1.90
1.20
5.40
62S
233
59.9
543
0.97
0.80
4.40
48.95
Feb-00
62P
498
80.9
667
2.10
1.10
5.30
62S
316
57.4
526
1.30
0,77
4.20
38,10
Apr-00
62P
547
107
746
2.30
1.40
6,00
62S
304
77.3
657
1.30
1.00
5.30
43.48
Jun-00
62P
766
2.41
42.5
3.30
0.03
0,34
62S
223
84.8
652
0.93
1,10
5.20
71.82
Aug-00
62P
630
85.2
792
2.60
1.10
6.30
628
155
56.5
620
0.64
0.75
5.00
75.38
Oct-00
62P
350
114
918
1.50
1.50
7.40
62S
55.7
65.7
663
0.23
0.88
5.30
84.67
Avg. 57.85

Sheetl
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: NPD(USA) Farm 62
Address: 385 Hwy 158
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
Telephone: [phone] Administrative Office
[phone] Farm
Table 1 - Field Specifications
i
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
Field of Field
County: Halifax
Date: 4/17102
Maximum
Maximum Application
Application per Irrigation
Rate Cycle
:•
��Bermuda

Sheet2
TABLE 2 - Travelling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment:
traveler w12.5"x850' hose and Nelson 100
Field No. Travel Application
TRAVEL LANE Wetted Nozzle Operating Operating
and Speed Rate
Effective Effective Diameter Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
Hydrant No. (ft/min) (in/hr.)
Width(ft.) Lenath(ft) (feet) (Inches) at Gun(psi) at reel(psi) Pattern Comments - Acres Der pull
®�
! . 1
! . !
®
1 • •
��
11 .r 1
s
----�-��_
Rollie

Sheet3
TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment
Operating Parameters
Field No Wetted Hydrant Spacing(ft) Application Nozzle Operating Operating
and Number of Diameter Along Between Rate Diameter Pressure Time
-------- 1 1 1
-------- 1 1 1
----_-�- MENU,1 !
MENVULUM
---��----■1 1 1 1

Sheet4
TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Solid Set
Irrigation Gun
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
167
0
Operating Pressure at Pump (psi)
96.6
#DIVI01
Design Precipitation Rate (inlhr)
0.42
#DIVI01
Hose Length (feet)
850
xxxxxx UC
Type of Speed Compensation
Mechanical
xxxxxx UC
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Engine
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
20.9
#DIVI01
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications
THRUST BLOCK
LOCATION
AREA (sq. ft.)
90 degree bend
8.77
Dead End
6.22
Tee
4.35
Gate Valve
6.22
45 degree bend
4.72
Page 1

Sheets
V I N
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER C1� �/ `' �
Name: Micah Kevin Weston, CID �="`/;� �
Company: Murphy -Brown, LLC * w
Address: 2822 Hwy 24 West, PO Drawer 856 Warsaw, NC 28398 ve
Phone: i 910293-3434 Q 41 .
Required Documentation
RiNK���
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
1. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, pipelines, thrust block locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes_
4. Sources and/or calculations used fok determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system
6. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-NRCS standard for IRRIGATION WATER CONVEYANCE.
8. The information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and
address them as appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval of the designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip of 25' or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all
, perennial streams and surface waters per NC Statutes.

Sheet6
Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
This is a "wetted acre" determination for a traveler system for an existing facility. This farm has
hydrants that are spaced for using a center pivot. Two of these hydrants will be moved to allow the
traveler system to have hydrants spaced at 77% of the wetted diameter. The acres were calculated
based on the equipment specified on sheet 2 and the tables developed by NCSU for calculating area
allowances for existing hard hose traveler systems_ These tables show allowances from 75% to 80%
lane spacings. The actual lane spacings are 77%, therefore the figures were interpolated to reflect
such.
Moving the two hydrants will require additional pipe to be installed. This additional pipe shall be 6"
Class 160 PVC and buried at a minimum of 30" deep. Schedule 80 fittings shall be used for all
connections. Thrust blocks and air vents shall be installed as shown on the drawing.

Sheet7
Sp[,lnkier Speecifiggtions
Sprinkler Type: Nelson 100
Nozzle Size:
0.965 inches
Sprinkler Pressure:
50 psi
Flowrate(GPM):
167 gpm
Wetted Diameter.
234 feet
CALCULATIONS
Reflects 10% reduction from manufacturers chart
Lane S acn inas
Desired Spacing (%): 70 %
Design Spacing(feet): 163.8 'PVC irrigation pipe normally comes in 20' pieces,
so round to the nearest multiple of 20.
Actual Spacing (feet): 180 feet
Actual Spacing (%): 77 %
Application Rate
Application Rate =(96.3xFlowrate)1(3.1415x(.9xradius)squared)
Design App. Rate = 0.42 in/hr
300 degree arc = 0.50 in/hr
220 degree arc = 0.68 In/hr
180 degree arc = 0.83 in/hr
Travel speed = 1.605 x Flowrate 1 Desired application amount x Lane Spacing
Desired app. (in.) =
0.35 inches
300 degree are =
4.25 ft/min
220 degree arc =
5.11 ftlmin
180 degree arc =
8.51 ftlmin
Mainline Velocity
Velocity = .408 x Flowrate /.pipe diameter. squared feet/sec."*
"For buried pipelines, velocity should be below 5 feet per second
Pipe size: 6 inches
Velocity= 1.89 ft/sec.
Page 1

Sheet?
Maximum Mainline -Friction- Loss
Most distant hydrant: 4
Total distance: 3080 feet
Friction Loss is figured using HazenlWilliam's Equation
Friction Loss= 0.21 feet/100 feet
Max. Mainline Loss = 6.4 feet or 2.8 psi
atal Dynamic Head
Sprinkler Pressure: 50 psi
Loss through traveller: 35 psi
Elevation head: 2.1 psi
Mainline loss: 2.8 psi
Suction head and lift: 2.1 psi
5% fitting loss: 4.6 psi
TOTAL(TDH) = 96.6 psi or 223.0 feet
Horsepower Required
Horsepower = Flowrate x TDH(feet)13960 / Pump effeciency
Pump Description:
Pump Efficiency: 45 %
orsepower Required: 20.9 Hp
Ibrust Blocking
Thrust Block Area = Thrust / Soil Bearing Strength
Thrust: 7460 feet
Soil Bearing Strength: 1200 feet
End Cap: 6.2 ft2
90 degree elbow: 8.8 ft2
Tee: 4.4 ft2
45 degree elbow: 4.7 ft2
Pipe PrPr,egsurg , ftting Check
Pressure Rating of Pipe to be Used: 160 psi
Max. Pressure on system when running: 96.6 psi
70% of Pressure Rating: 112 psi
If Max. Pressure on system is less than 70% of Pressure Rating, OK
Page 2

- State_of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Smithfield Carroll's Farms
Farm 62
PO Box 1240
Waverly VA 23890
Dear Smithfield Carroll's Farms:
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND,NATURAL RESOURCE$
December 30, 1999 I'
L�--- IR R�,(ff�N
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number "42=24:?
Halifaz_Coanty.::?
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRYI,.DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycied/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 26, 1998
Adolph Miller
Farm 62
PO Box 1240
Waverly VA 23890
C
IL
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS420024
Farm 62
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Halifax County
Dear Adolph Miller:
In accordance with your application received on April 27, 1998, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Smithfield Carroll's Farms, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but
not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Farm 62, located in Halifax County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 500 Farrow to Finish and -the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions .and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS420024
Farm 62
Page 2
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
-• A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
• p � (� �_� . C�1 f�
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Halifax County Health Department
tRalei h-Re ional-Office-Water uality-Section �' � 4199$
g g._._ � Q� Y L..
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File DEHNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Farm 62
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Smithfield Carroll's Farms
1.3 Mailing address: PO Box 1240
City, State: Waverly Va _ Zip: 23890
Telephone Number (include area code): 834-2109
1.4 County where facility is located: Halifax
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): SR 1 112 1/2 mile N.N.W. of intersection of SR H 12
and SR 1113.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Rebept '. Manly- jkjal„}, M i yJr r _
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Carroll's Foods, Inc Smithfield Carroll's
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/92
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): N/A
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 FacilityNo.: 42 (county number); 24 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descrip i noti not Swine operation
ow to Finish
500- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? [::]Yes; F7no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Wean to Feeder Layer Dairy
Feeder to Finish Non -Layer Beef
Farrow to Wean (# sow) Turkey
Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page I of 4 42 - 24

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 34.21 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 34.21
2.4 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (please circle one)
2.5 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (please circle one)
2.6 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
(YE3 or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? i n
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? I m / /q I
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations; _ >
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations. C'P
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.4 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.)
If your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, such as an irrigation design,
or site evaluation, please include the additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 2 of 4 42 - 24

Facility Number: 42 - 24
Facility Name: Farm 62
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, AbcLPIA t4IL a, F7?9- SM iTKFiG7Lp- 4'Agg} LL' S (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for S N i7h-Pt [ s1 - CAP42C L' S PAA-,45 tl L, Z.. (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to incomplete �y
Signature ,lrTy � 1A Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only ifdifferent from the Land Owner)
1, &DOij" MILL Pk. Mt` P, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for V4I TN-Fje—LZ — C-A-RW'cLL' S F;OA I S b L (Facility name listed in question 1.I)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as i plete
Signature _ ,. iz &A e,2 Date y^ L
THE
APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 3 of 4 42 - 24

DI`-ISION OF NVATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (I/98)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Wood`in Place
Asheville, NC 28801
(70"')251-6208
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Cat•
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Ha%-,A•ood
Transvlvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building. Suite 714
Favetteville. NC 2E301
(910)486-15"'1
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Bizden
Richmond
Cumberland
Robeson
Ham, e ,
Sampson
Hoke
Scotland
Monteornery
Winston-Salem Regional VVQ Supervisor
585 Wauehto-wn Street
Winston-Salem. NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
A]amance
Roci:irgohafn
Allechany
Randolph
Ash
Stokes
Caswell
Sum•
Davidson
V�'atausa
Davie
NVilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquimans
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tvrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alexander
Lincoln
Cabamts
Mecklenburg
Catawba
Rowan
Cleveland
Stanly
Gaston
Union
Iredell
FORM: A«'O-G-E 1/28/98 Page 4 of 4
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edeecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Pender
Duplin

•ws '.r�� -F r jr �, v'��.�. � ,-r,� •jY. � r '] .'. - . •.r ..'S/ `1 ,-,• �'� ' tea.71
,�• �1�•% C � — ... .. `. !f 'rye •�•rr� .1 tt !+ � ` . �.� x ♦ R,
r '� �!!' .� � •,+:. 'i�'.' . . „� J ' "fir' rr
� y► •a. ,S.T•�i ••�•� �'`�� f+++ccF+++.� ., . .f . '!�. ,` J�� •...I. a� iY +t..�'� � ��
•�- h'. '1 � � _ �•y ". :Y• �•'. � �� •�\ tit'., .w,•'
' •� ' ` •- ' ,rJ -'��� 'y;l�g,. •. �(. .{� is J +��:
ov
.14
-IF IFT
77
If
41
It
�74 _ ^�.. r�S' fir• �. 1t�
JC •t !�qJ �'+.f,"'+AF.y;. y 'r 5' ~ ` 'J��. r t� , ,•p' r'. .s' s� d •�'r '1
.. y !/I�r..IP�V. �`;. L `rt'�+1 _�wti �r 1r' ..'Y r a t•...� r �., RIO Jf+.yyl-
� [..:. ?'4ra', '. �• F *' r •r . -' .J. i, ,•• S,5 '� fRir •f . ,a r e:� . 1.`-• r � `'0{`. .'
5w f't' � � "1 .�i e� � .✓', ! .'' .r `. .�' .ter^. .� •!,i�1r:~�,�yr�.'y'r
AV-
\-• • •ii'• �' .�:^ rr -ti.., A Pam•'• +
\ `�<y: l° � ^r , f '•1 �Vir, C.y:. y i:.� la ''1�. •Ktf.4,>t w'1. • .,��...• � � �
J � ^ �• ::s��,.• j�, •�• � ,y'''''Tj•�•�'.a. [C ' `'�,'.•' ':err' 'yM• •�t: �����! .�e Z.;.
+ ���'�a��f �.' ,'�".'h� -. ... ���'�.. �, :i�f �. � ri, •,•'�__� •y °!}' a'y' y i•.'1ttii�.��{y, 1.•, .-:

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer. Carroll's Foods of Virginia, Inc.
Location: East of Enfield off of Rte. 1112
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Farrow to Finish
Number of Animals: 500 sows (Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce
the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be
applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all
plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potential, cation exchange
capabilities, and available water holding capabilities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be applied
to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it
is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a
growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for
this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from
Your waste management facility. Attached, you will find information on proper sampling
techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if tamed out; meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Yearfoallons. W. tons, etc.)
500 animals x 10,585 gal (amt.) waste/animal/year = 5,292,500 al (amt.) waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAM_Produced Per Year
500 animals x 26 lbs. PAN/animal/year = 13,000 lbs. PAN/year.
(PAN from N. C. Tech Guide Std. 633)
Amount of Plant Available_ Nitrogen (PAN) From Secondary Lagoon
13,000 lbs. PAN/year x 80% = 10,400 lbs. PAN/year.
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract #
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Lbs. N per
Ac.
Acres
Lbs. N
Utilized
Month of
Application
1291
1
Emporia
Bermudagrass Hay
350
2.60
910
Apr -Oct
2
Gritney
lBermudagrass Hay
350
31.61
11,064
Apr -Oct
1
Emporia
ISmall Grain
50
2.60
130
Feb -Apr &Nov
2
Gritney
Small Grain
50
31.61
1,581
Feb -Apr &Nov
Total 1 34.21 1 13,684'
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizers
are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in
some eastern counties of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land [See Required Specification 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
• See footnote for Table 1.
Table 1
Table 2
Total
11tilized ..
Totals from above Tables
Acres
Lbs. N Utilized
34.21
13,884
0
0
34.21
13,684
Amount.of N Produced
Surplus or Deficit
10,400
3,284
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of
sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary
measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of waste water.
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field
No.
Soil Type
Crop
Application
Rate In/Hr
Application
Amount in.
1
Emporia
Bermuda/Small Grain
0.35
5.9
2
Gritney
Bermuda/Small Grain
0.35
5.9
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION,
HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume
of waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation 86.4 ft. .
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
Narrative of Operation: This operation is located off of Rte. 1112 east of Enfield in Halifax
County. The operation is located on CFSA tract 1291. The swine operation is farrow to finish
with a design capacity of 500 active sows. It is estimated that 5,292,500 allons of animal waste
will be produced annually for land application. There are 34 acres of cropland available for land
application. The waste from the swine houses is stored in a primary and secondary anaerobic
treatment lagoon system. The secondary laaoon is used to further reduce the nitrogen content of
the waste before_ it island applied. Frequent sampiln4of our secondary lagoons of similar
capacity and geographic location, indicates that nitrogen levels are reduced an additional 40%.
The latest lagoon sample analyses for this farm shows that the nitrogen content of the secondary
lagoon was 54% less than the nitrogen content of the primary lagoon (see attached analysis). A
reduction of 20% was used to determine nitrogen production for this plan. The waste is land
applied to bermudagrass haviand using irrigation. A small grain cover crop will be planted in the
fall for fall and early spring applications. The small grain cover crop will be removed as hay.
Before sludge is applied, samples will be taken to determine its nutrient content. Application
rates for the sludge will be based on the nutrient content of the sludge so that it is applied at
agronomic rates.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are
subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of
Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. if the
producer does not own adequate land to property dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS
with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life
expectancy of the production facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to
secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not to exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or an
Altemative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves
the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by the DEM. [See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See 'Weather and Climate 'in North Carolina" in the Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions conducive
to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not .be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no more than
20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a
high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a
minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 50 feet to surface water. This distance may be
reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips are
present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned
by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by a
discharge or by overspraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses. Animal waste may be applied at agronomic rates to grassed waterways that do not
discharge directly into water courses provided the application causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not
be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition to
the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon
berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or
discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible
for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an
illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis
to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
21. Wastewater should be analyzed at least twice annually to determine nutrient content.
2-2. Fields receiving wastewater should be soil sampled each year to monitor micronutrients,
phosphorous, potash, and time levels.
23. The crops, on which wastewater is applied, should be removed from the farm.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
24. Crop yields should be recorded and meet yield targets shown in the waste utilization plan.
25. Records should be kept to document when, where, and how much waste water is applied.
26. Waste analyses and soil sample reports should be kept for at least three years.
27. Daily rainfall amounts should be recorded.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Smithfield-Carroll's Farm 62
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste
treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to
be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this
system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil
and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner. Smithfield-Carroll's Farms try_ Adolph iller�Geneml Manager
(Please print)
Signature: «�LCG Date:
Name of alter (If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) i P, O
Affiliation: L) '
Address (Agency):
1, ,c. ► � ?S'3
Signature: a Date:
,La Vie. �E

t
h

14
Zk
� r' •�, r -• y�y'� �, ' pl : tea R •�''
It �, rJ ti 1'tir-.:+'Iap
L,• , 1f. f ..r 1-S •.\
.•�lsi.�' f ?' ,`ii;� ' ,y L+n,.My, `11��, •�• �r • r�'wF, � � � :It
It
",1 •% • y''� J4 �, 'J• 7,•; !1�•I tip'td' '�li..
rrlw •�,'s•';,ir d._ /• .:7.�b• rR'-•',� a 1 r •+Tr
r:{ a� i,} ` My"rA' .�*
ati S �1' •� •, _ r->. 1. •r4�.'.�ff 'f• 1YA
'in•��' .T i IA'
'T' S., -' f -r'�• Ste' :i \
t
f.or'�
•'�
01/
�`aii,:,i•.'�1'r' .7-,�-•� f 'r.ii��iC,i. '�I�+ \��,� �!..1 =\\ ,` r
nl. - •:r:+ t, ' "rr'�L•��.i,1'�' � ' ,�'� ,�'�� f n • .�` rP�1~ , r F; !' ' 1
vI
\ : '. ,,,� , •1y-%1•l r Y:::r:.: .: r ..- �� `�_' .C.r� l ,.;;'��" ter_ ,,.fir"•., f._

i
a
• �3�A — r
3c5n .
5�6
s
.�
� 3i65A
Sa
1 — �
v�. •_ � r 37c� ti�7p'•.
1 '+
- q11
S ne
-
J
a S�41j+
r�
i y
` -ains Sheec G-.3
7!h
k►7
411
V.
it
!•,r
71pt1
ug
454
455E
i
3L5A
t�
44�F
365+ti
r s... 110
all
y�1
411
•.� ,. - .j,
N,,5
. 3658•'�. A
•
�u5p :i
}4SN
• � is : � �u+� �
F,
f
•
J i
i
4
-4
a

ENFI ELO TO
1 r+E r NALI KAX CO., N(
S C A LE II - i o6 C SURVEY BY S.V.
j� W E T 7 7. 1 I r :. r +�O
_ r..� /4\ asSoclarEs c.L.!
a rs.s r. s t• • :�ao,_.'.^ �`� TOTAL AR EA a 35.
\7 • ■ 72.0 • 1 ;rl r Jo 7
r a.f
7 [ O . a sitr
rr.4n.f 1...1•, ■ 1.1 . \ a3' ♦4.a 1
.1 111 11.L saa 1.77.•
r�
aus 4o.a at.i ua . ..• as.� �f.l a ■ ��■.+ ■+ 1 u.o a1.o1 ■1 7r. rss 7s� 7.7 r• r
as 1 87.1 a-4.7 as.r s4.7 84-% • a a. 7 ■a.�(v.+ 7, Ot.l� ■1. !0. 1 � .7 T. 1 7610 ra'. T.-■ 74.• r. ■
;I OPENS ` a7. } 0() t�` -- wt r
n.a 41.a 4f.a •s.7 •.7 as n.! a.a •a. ■•s �•:w� I $4.4 47.6E a ;•a■ ta.r 7, I 7s.r 7s 1 1,
1
1 05.1 41.a a4.a as. as.1 s.7 sa.a as a �`• 4 ••• 041.4 .a 4,4 01 a rr , ,.0 r+• 7+■ if
4-10 ■ . .• a+.• so a7,1 a;a Tl a7"+ 9a4 30.4 +■. 1,t v� T ea 04.7 C� Tu.0 7s.• 79.2 :y,a 7.
O PE +. • \ f �� 0 0 S ye r �� M E T
a� a $1, J a 7 a4.1 ,1 .1 0.1 a. sa.4 ,. .! 03 a 'tom at Pa.a J.a raj 16.7 72.7 74.3 7■.9
l l •o, a r
,.7: 60,1 alp 00 •! *%.1. +.a sl.2 aL. 8.4 Mo as s sa.s 18.6 91 f7: sa,1 a1.a so r7.9ras 761 70.5 r7.:
T,, ► I I 1 � 1
O1',� •f ., l 7l.f aL. f■.1 aa.6 7.1 0 ■s.s ` f.a s.a . s 041 )• .1 ■ � �f .r 04.s as a rs• rr ` Tr.a 77 G
,I 1
1 a s J as. 7 0, a ..7 a•-8/9
f s1T fJ.7 sa.6 ,4f,s .s.7 •r.! aa0 'tra • faa ! _ l.S •T.I ■a.)f •af Ja.a f•7A 71
1
.. /aa.a �.•'�'� f w0005 F r wE
/ CEM£7ERY
1..■:+ 44.1 74-9 as,J •ao fr,a 97.9 u.a aa.o azs ■r,aataaas fa• ■..+ 1 91.1 ars a■.) ■r.7 7+.• 7a., 76.7
1 /
CE METERY I
_ OPEN S f
K' a: //. ,7,, I �0 GRAVES I
CL
Ata6 y 91,0 +. • 07.1 .L♦ 97.7 M-1 a■,D /f.0 f a.a 74. 1 sT.I fa.T' .. .5.1 ar.t 41 a ■+ a . ■.• al 1 764 77.0 lla
CE ME TE hY I
. r _
r
I � a

Smithfield-Carroll's Farms
Lagoon Analyses for Halifax County Farms
Farm 62 Data from North Carolina Department of Agriculture Agronomic Division
Date
Lagoon
Laboratory Results
TKN P K
( m) mj mj
N
IbsJ1000
Nutrients Available for First Crop
P2O5 K2O
al. lbsJ1000 al.j lbsJ1000 gal.
Nitrogen
Reduction
%
Apr-93
62P
500
100
400
2.00
1.43
3.00
62S
300
0
100
1.20
0.00
0.75
40.00
Apr-94
62P
700
100
600
2.80
1.43
4.50
62S
300
100
400
1.20
1.43
3.00
57.14
Apr-95
62P
800
100
700
3.20
1.43
5.25
62S
400
100
500
1.60
1.43
3.75
50.00
Sep-95
62P
427
100
610
1.60
1.30
4.90
62S
126
95.7
630
0.47
1.30
5.10
70.63
Apr-96
62P
602
92.9
497
2.30
1.20
4.00
62S
399
173
447
1.50
2.30
3.60
34.78
Sep-96
62P
826
446
675
3.10
6.00
5.40
62S
217
113
642
0.81
1.50
5.10
73.87
Apr-97
62P
756
56.2
608
2.80
0.75
4.90
62S
476
43.8
551
1.80
0.59
4.40
35.71
Jun-97
62P
777
79.2
613
2.90
1.10
4.90
62S
336
73.3
587
1.30
0.98
4.70
55.17
Sep-97
62P
497
105
688
1.90
1.40
5.50
62S
42
69.4
676
0.16
0.93
5.40
91.58
Feb-98
62P
665
93.3
605
2.50
1.30
4.80
62S
392
67
614
1.50
0.90
4.90
40.00
Avg. 54.59

AT-ZAC'-:XZVT B
= - I of
Agri -Waste Mang gement
Bialogicaland AgriCulturat Errgineerirng North Carolina Sta!e University
L:4ESTOCK LiAS= SA.'! =NC, A3i EISIS XX0 CALCULA.:ON
OF LAND AP?LZCA::ON RATIS
Ja:es C. Barked
I. SW U COL EC 1CN
A. Semi -Solid Laz Manure
i. Scraped di ec__y from lot into spreader
a. From Loaded spreader, collect about 2 Ibs of manure f_on
different locations using nor=ecallic collectors.
U. Froa storage
a. CoLlec_ about 2 Us of manure fro= under the surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using non=ecallic collectors.
B. Liquid Manure Slurry
i. [Ender-sloewd-Boor pic
a. Extend a I/2" nonmetallic Conduit open on both ends into
manure.ca Fit floor.
b. Seal upper end of conduit (e.g., by placing i QuK over end
of canduiz) trapping manure that has entered Lover end, remove
and ecpty slurry inco'plastic bucker or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsar_ples from 5 or tore locations or at least I quart.
d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint ca norm ecal_ic sample container.
i_. Uzarior Karate basin or rank
a. `rake sure manure has been well mixed vi:h a liquid manure
chotre_•agitatoz pump or p: pe:l-er ag_:a:.,r.
b. sake swis.:r_.es from.. ahou: ] P-: locations, f_-m ay__srgr pu--
or Umm manu,_ spreader and dace in a plasrjc bucke_.
* Professor and _x:ans-an Spec-al_s:. Voiogical and Agri _l: w! 2^g_~err-ng
DepaW=e^ , Nor:.. QrslLna Scace Un_yerzi:-!. Raleigh. ';C.

20f3
• e. Mix and add 3/4 pint to a non:ecallic sa=ple container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
1. Collect about 3/'4 pint of recfcled lagoon liquid fro-n in:1o•. pipe
to flush canics in a nor^necallic sacple container.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a s=all boc=le
b. Extand boct'_a 10-15'
c. Brush away f'_oacing
d. 5ubmer6+ boc_le w:t't
e. Enac-1 inc7 a
lagoon, nix. and add
0. 3roiler or Turkey Lit-te.
I. House litter
(1/2 pine or less) on end of 10-15' pole,
away fro= bank edge.
sc--= or debris.
:n 1' of liquid surfaca.
buc'ke: , repeat abcu_ 5 times jround
3/4 plat to nor_^c"_,C.-_c sarple eonca:ner
a. visual r inspect 1, ._a_ fc_ areas of va^t_ag qua! -Cy. e g
areas a:o_Zd fzede.= and vazerer , and est'__ace percane a -
-
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 !::tar subsaraples at locations prapor_:onace to
Lten a. E.g., if 341 of l___er of similar visual qualic-r is
around fe_rars and wacarars, cake 1 subsaraple there and the
ocher 4, subs.: -;Las "rora re=aindar of floor surface.
C. At each collect li_=ar f_on a 5' by b" area dog.. cc
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 ,uesa^plus have been added to the bucket. m-;x, and add
about-Z-3 lbs l:t_ar to it nor%=ecallic sample container such as
a 1-gallan Freezer bag and seal.
U . From stockpile
a. Take ;u�-.'^;les °_=ra abcut 5 locations at leasc 13" into ;:le.
b. Xix, ac:- _ 2 its t. nor_-eta:'_:c sar7la container and sea:..

ATTACHMENT B
3 of 3
II. SAHTL° PRE?ARATION A.`is7 :?-A.NSF7-R
A. Place sarple into an expandable container Chat can be sealed. Rinse
residues from cnr._a:net w.th dean water but do noc use disinfectants,
soaps, or C;eae in any ocher way.
B. Pack sarpie 1-i Lca. ref:'gerace, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Fland-del.rer-f is most -__;able way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, pracec_ sc:^p_e container with packing material such as
nevspape:, box or rat::age with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial saa;tle c_n:ainers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
L. A&L East_^ Ag__c__t__al lab, Inc. iii. Polf=oaa Packers Corp.
7621 Vhiz_oine "lead 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Ric:`=crd, VA 2== Vheelirg. IL 60090
Ph: (304)743-34-'% Ph: [phone]
it. Fisher Sctenci=;c Co. iv. NASCO
3315 --mcon Road 901 Janesville Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27504 Fort Atkinson, uI 53538
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
F. Private arialyCical labs are available, buc sample analyses are costly.
G. The NCOA provides this service for Korth Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Departent of Agr:c_Itsra
AS onozic Division
P1ant/:Tascc/So Lucian Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Canter
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
?h: [phone]
At==:: Dr. Ray Campbel.?
ii. For arl 14 al :i_h the sam;-1e.
fit. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. _ivo=tocSc sFeciss (da:_�, swine, cu=kev, ect )
b. L:vest__k asa_e (sJne-nurser;r, fins ing. cu_key-breeders,
Sr;oderFcusa. grc_e„ nu:.ae_ f'_ocks grove on 1ic_er, etc.)
c. '.asz_ type ;d: _ ?at sc,-ged :r.ar.ure, liquld slur-y; slsirie-pit
sl•-;rry, laa...n sLudgs: bra-ler-house l,trer, stockpile
"loutine analyses perfot^ed on all sarnles: N. P. K. Ca, *!g, Na,
S. Fe, !In, Zn, Cu. 8
v. Additional ana: ses perr�_.ed upon request. OM, Mo. Cd. Ni, Pb

rOrr, 00441a-
9NITED_STATES_________ Soil_ --------- P. 0. Box 10s_2QI_St. Andrews `
DEPARTMENT_OE_w ______ ConservationTarboro,_North Ca:2iina 27886
AGRICULTURE -------------- ServiceTeEephone_(919)_S4Tr7g00
Subject: ENG — Carroll's Foods Lagoon Designs Date: May 27, 1992 .
To: Wayne Short, District Conservationist
Halifax, North Carolina
I have reviewed the swine waste management plans
for Farm No. 62 (Partin Farm) and Farm NO. 63
(Harris Farm) in Halifax County. Both plans
appear to meet Soil Conservation Service
specifications.
Joy P. Sherrod
Civii Engineer
cc: S. Cox

--.cam
.' _r•:-•-� - -J..., + •.-�:.:'. G Z', > c�
..1
� i
G
�•

SCF No.: 62
Operator:Carroll's Foods VA County: Halifax
Distance to nearest residence (other -than owner):
I. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT
Date
01/10/92
2500.0 feet
500
sows
(farrow to finish)
x
1417
lbs.
= 708500
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to feeder)
x
522
lbs.
- 0
lbs
0
head
(finishing only)
x
135
lbs.
- 0
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to wean)
x
433
lbs.
= 0
lbs
0
head
(wean to feeder)
x
30
lbs.
- 0
lbs
V708500
TOTAL STEADY STATE
LIVE
WEIGHT
(SSLW) _
lb's
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 708500 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(Cr)/lb. SSLW= 1 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 70850�cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet: Owner requests no sludge storage.
. Sludge will be removed as needed.
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME for PRIMARY LAGOON
Inside top length ,610.0 feet ; Inside top width 150.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 88.0 feet
u,1, io, Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes 2.0 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
a,rre Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 87.0 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 75.0 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation -at_.$-feet,/
Total design volume using prismoidai formula 1-no
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.5 606.0 145.5 12.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH
606.0 145.5 88173.0 (AREA OF TOP)
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
558.0 91.5 51057.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
582.0 118.5 275868.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = (AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM)
88173.0 275868.0 51057.0
DEPTH/6
2.1
DESIGN VOLUME FOR PRIMARY LAGOON = 830A96 CU. FT.

4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME for SECONDARY LAGOON
Inside top length 310.0 feet Inside top width 150.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 88.0 feet'
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes 2.0 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 87.0 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 75.0 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 48ii. feet � /oie
7a . 3 �rrr7, c,vrr �,Pr`
Total design volume using prismoidal formula nQ s�as�nq/} a e �
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE]. SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.5 306.0 145.5 12.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH
306.0 145.5
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
258.0 91.5
44523.0 (AREA OF TOP)
23607.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH WIDTH * 4
282.0 118.5 133668.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM]
44523.0 133668.0 23607.0
DESIGN VOLUME for SECONDARY LAGOON = 40�596CU. FT.
DEPTH/6
2.0

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
PRIMARY LAGOON
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width = square feet
610.0 150.0 91500.0
SECONDARY LAGOON
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width = square feet
310.0 150.0 46500.0
Drainage for dike between Primary & Secondary Lagoons
Length * Width square feet Length * Width = square feet
550.0 5.0 2750.0 550.0 5.0 2750.0
TOTAL DA 94250.0
TOTAL DA 49250.0
Design temporary storage period to be 180-days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 708500 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day * 180 days
Volume = 173020 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Location of weather station used : Enfield
Rainfall exceeds evaporation 6 months used: Oct -Mar
180 days excess rainfall 12.0 inches
Volume = 12.0 in * DA / 12.�inches per foot
Primary Lagoon Secondary Lagoon
Volume = 94,407.1 cubic feet 49332.1 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 6.7 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
PRIMARY LAGOON SECONDARY LAGOON
Volume = 52.622.94cubic feet 27497.9 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
Primary Secondary
5A waste produced. 173020 cubic feet
5B wash water. 0 cubic feet
5C rainfall. 94407 49332 cubic feet
5D 25yr-24hr. 52623 27498 cubic feet
TOTAL 396880 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
r
Total required volume `1105,380 cubic feet
Total design
volume
avail. A233W 92
cubic feet
408500
Min. req. treatment
volume plus sludge accumulation
cubic ft
Total design
volume
less 25yr-24hr
storm is 1153,671
cubic feet
A
5•0� feet secondary
fend numninQ}.
�rJ- . �
�'?5 yt- �.4hr-
�"�r.v�,
�«r�C�Q'� �G�S'CG•
At elev.
W-zer.feet ;
(start numnina}
Seasonal high
water
table elevation
7. DESIGNED BY:"APPROVED BY:
DATE: % L�`r T/ / DATE:

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment with minimum odor
control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached may vary due to soil conditions,flushing operations, and
the amount of fresh water added to the system.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent runoff from the field or damage -
to crops.
The following items are to be carried out:
1. The primary lagoon will be pre -charged to 1/2 its capacity to
Prevent excessive odors during start-up. Pre -charging reduces the
concentration of the initial waste entering the lagoon thereby
reducing odors. Solids should be covered with effluent at all times.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment H)
before land application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when f uid,,level reaches eleva-
tion a5•ISW in the secondary lagoon a marked by'permanent
markers. Stop pump -out when the fluid level reaches elevation
75CM in the secondary lagoon
4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation+is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

SITE EVALUATION REPORT
Producer: [`arrO//,s
ry,ge, and Size Opera ti on:
,50D -4C1r-r-ow -in -Ani.SA
SCS Job Class:
County: Da te: 1011 %�/
Di stance
to
the Nearest Residence Other. Than Owner or
Public faci i i t :
par+`, r Facrn +neac
parr: 15 rarer Pnd J I a.Do
.
Di stance to wells and other water sources:
5; 4-e ). - 7 1 AD a 4+
ffaza_rd Cl ass fi cati oir:
oaf h i,+, k,: i/ b e ci � " f+uzarC� .
Th¢ wa 5 -& o.? ,s; i? *'I
ffousi Pp faci l i tr:
9u #er- vo/aS h
ncf o ve,,A p o p y; rr,Prc✓F-nP,rls.
-7�ia".p . rr/a
.*-ee'yCle &U05h w47�Pt -A,," 3eeorl zv�e !aJ GTh
--avy ,P/v,Aj ,'r7-/c ll�/aa.n
Lagoon Specifics:
,ba46 6.- es c v, f% 6L �`►�e [tl O1r7,�I1�rr�rt7/ �''{ C4vG
.�° (ske pe54
�/a / ✓cr-l��Q/ .sh��r/d 6P �a�f� o�ti-.r/l <n�E���kr7)P� s,� s/ape
C ins,de � ��fs, �; 5.a� 5/0�5' C'o►�76i�±� O� .� ��`Z. fo / � ✓Pr�.
pump nq Crcl e: /yD 61mS

SITE EVALUATION REPORT
page 2
Land Application of Mastc (ac_res available, crops):
SD - &o ac res Q�oL��nf�e
Gc�P/iC4�T dr arr aPrrl�a pri/r►Gr,��j/ l 33
a �pr+a6 ; nubtron d� Per.rada Corn Jrrp�/ bP c(3Pd
Waste Irrigation Equipment:
g`AYN ,ett
Perri is Requi red:
P4 +F< j) rr.�, r10 Loos-:-, perm,45 w. (/ be -,-,e r f�,r /moan
C'Ons�i�D n • ,�
Summar Y of Soi l s Investi ga ti on: /1
Si L 3�:-htfJ/e jsor / rr.2��ri a� Tor -emba4fw;nf
e Ycr r✓P4/Pd sa-r►¢ pou/y yra (skro's , �h cf, c,� f: 11 ve a
/ prt r � / �,, bob fo►►,
Poem f, al or Pa e - °�° i n 9L%12
�P of seb� -i15 a di6ia/, �� 5 irtn¢er. a� i s PX
one o should 6� uradorou� � : nrl�s
etcaval(ed bol*tm ar irLs;& S/90P,
•5�ar 4nd 6act�'�%/rd a f �Gh� d� L� L .r�aKer cr/, i2 rrpr'rr� ry
�p- mms4 be iVl- aZ-'O'e y
S•' a 1/try -3 �:,c,Qb /e ,50 / rr 4lTlicr % ar PmAonLr0V. AID rf? Cri'Gl i
�ruo�rr A- Tern arQ r .sparos e mecs�
Misc. I tc 6e KQp7l ObbVe z5c2Soral h)Y, wash fdt.,/eAo
Sui tabi l i ty of si tc-(/s.) or sari nc operation:
.S�es Lire° .5 a;xa le -
i�ePor� t^epo'C88 by.,

' U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
, SCS•538 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
10.56
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
FARMER'S NAME m ISTRICT d A. a
•DATE D G COUNTY
S. C. S. PHOTO SHEET NO. WORK UNIT - - -
WATERSHED AREA MEASUREMENT'S
CROPLAND ACRES PASTURE ACRES k/aynf = h4>r--
WOODLAND ACRES TOTAL _�___�� ACRES �6iiH CLASS WORK UNIT CONSERVATIONIST
SKETCH OF PROPOSED PON N WING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Approx. scale I"= feet)
to reference point on center line of dam and Identify on sketch. naf .j-0 ti,t.Q/C
■rrrr��rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
■r���rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr,
ME.rrrrrrrrrrrr�►�rrrrrrrrrr
�.�rrrrrrrrrrrrrr�i�rrrrrrrrr■
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr���rrrrrerrtr
rrrrrrrrrtrrrrrrrrrra�rrrrrr
rrr
.rrrrrrrrrrrr
MCrrrrr■
■�ii�''I
<��,�rrrrrrrrrr�r��r���rrrr
■«�rrr��.�rrrrrrr►rrrr��r�r��rrr
MINN
■r}
■rrrr
c��urrrr�i.:�rrrri�rrrrrr�
��rrrrrrr
���rrr�lrrrrrr�rr�rrrr■
��rr��rrr��r��r�ca����r��rrrrr��rr�rrrrr
r�1r..'
���IR��Irrr���i�•
-
�rfr�Jli�rrrrrr
■rrrrr��>��,�r��►�rrrrrrr�rrrrrrrrr
rrrrrrrri,�rrrrrr���rr�l��rrr
rrrrrrrr��r��r�l��rrrrrrrrr
0
BORING NUNIBERPROFILE
Make and list dam-ille and spillwav bormas first - then pondeor arm and borrow pit borings. separate With vertical red line.
(Continued on back where necasfar;1) show water table elevallons an dam -ilia 6orings.
[4]ICI©101©f�1�i11l7.MImf®1011®#ml®I
MIE�lmlm�Q71®1�I
MI
NA'Jlrlr!1"In!
r:rfrirti.�l�lrl�lrlrlrfrfrlrfrlr
1�r�C�lrlrf�"!'!■snt"••;rlrlr##EQl�irl�"
�
I�trfrlL�l�I�t�IONIMlgllr!©1NE!!
=lrl!Q=1A1
'""
N1M1r
®f�r�riP.lx��f
rfrfrlrt�}��rl�tr�r���rlr�r
MEMO.
SIM
UPONMUMMIES
�rl�rlr#rlrlrfr;rlr
■
''
��l—l—lrfr!rirtrlrCrlr
MMININNIN
W
rlrlr
r
Mall©!rl�lrlrlrlrlrlrlrlr
sr!rIr!rlrlr!r�
Irlrlr�rEr!r�rlrlrl
■ �
r!�rlr�rl■
�r!r!r!rIr!rirl
!rl�r!rtr�r!r!�rlriririr�r!r�r�r
�rlrlrlrlrirlrrlr#rlrlrlrfrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrl
rrr�rrr�rirrErr�r�r�r�r!r�r�Irr�r�r�
!
�
LBORINGS MADE BY - e /a rC_ �d Ir SIGNATURE & TITLE n� 1 r
�bo�rrgg .,wc� 4vl4l, 6arkApe )

j g . gravel
vcos - very coarse sand
coarse sand
a - sand
fa - fine sand
We - very fine sand
lcos - loamy coarse sand
Is - loamy sand
Ifs - loamy fine sand
al - sandy loam
fal - fine sandy loam
vfal - very fine sandy loam
TYPES L-jp,
gal - gravelly sandy loam
I - Ioam
gI - gravelly loam
stl - stony loam
a= - silt
all - ailt loam
cl - clay loam
sicl - silty clay loam
Hc1 - sandy, clay lown
atcl - stony clay loam
sic - silty clay
c - clay
1. Suitable material for embankment is available [DYea 0 No (lndfrale whirr located on the rketch on
rewTse ride)
REMAW- Prr�hc+n �rnFr
�7 4pza- 71%P/�; �.5 54i7D��t'e F� r`t riA or
.� f ,`l-� ��y�P� /��aQ.� Qrea � �L rr)a�er•a� s�,o�k� .62
cr.scd .� �� C��.c�e��'-r�r-e��e�i 7��•�3-� �he-r1 CjL� SG' i S/7'7 �%rD4f�=
f c�r?'Jee-r7knrrr�.
i Explait hazards requiring special attention h ;leg"4-a (Seepece-wring..nwk eec.1
Second S'�oJIF— Valuirle n7/e-!l rae. . � al'z" . —/A{ c?SDI'rE�
S-'yh vct Cr bee. So;(s !r✓Paled r0a". e
S 7l `"eY , 77ie bolo,>, W Ae
NERAL REMARKS:
,V 1� -SP ma-lerio l ; S e,cpo.5Pc .-h 7Ih E.t'ra vQJ7�Q`f a7/yarr/
a 4i'-A , SAAce A/ be
eoro flat f Fd la�e-- zV CZ-

Operations and Maintenance Plan
INSPECTION/ DOCUMENTATION SPECIFICATIONS
Each CAWMP has included an Emergency Action Plan. In the event that effluent
is discharged from the waste management system, farm personnel should refer to the
Emergency Action Plan for remediation procedures.
All components of the waste management system are to be inspected weekly by
the certified operator in charge. Each week the certified operator will visually inspect
each component of the waste management system and document his/her findings on a
weekly inspection checklist. This checklist will be kept on file by the operator in charge
for presentation to Division of Water Quality personnel upon request. Inspections should.
include the following:
Lagoon: Pool Area- inspect the lagoon pool area for undesirable vegetative growth
and excessive foreign material or debris. Foreign material should be removed on an as
needed basis and vegetation on the inside of lagoon banks controlled by mowing,
chopping, or chemicals.
Embankment: The operator will walk each lagoon and inspect lagoon embankment
for integrity. Vegetation on the lagoon embankment must be properly maintained in
order to accurately access its integrity. Routine mowing of embankments is suggested as
a means to best manage these areas. Specific items to note include, but are not limited to,
extreme settlement or low points along the lagoon berm, side slope stability, seepage, or
wet areas on back slope, erosion, and rodent damage. Inspection findings will be
documented on the weekly inspection report. Should repairs be required to the lagoon,
the operator in charge should contact a qualified technical specialist before commencing
any activities that affect the lagoon structures.
Pipes: All pipes should be inspected weekly for cracks, separation, or any potential
restrictions of flow. Where pipes enter the Iagoon, they should be extended such that
erosion of the liner cannot occur. These pipe extensions should have proper supports to
prevent sagging. Pipes leading to irrigators, including connections, should be inspected to
assure proper waste transport, and to prevent leakage that may result in uneven
application of effluent.
Pumps: All pumps will be inspected weekly. The certified operator shall indicate if
each pump was operating in a normal or abnormal condition. The inspection should also
indicate if any leaks from loose fittings or seals were detected and indicate repair action.
Irrigators: Each irrigation unit will be visually inspected for loose fittings, poor seals,
or other methods of waste leakage to ensure proper application of swine effluent.

Operations and Maintenance Plan
INSPECTION/DOCUMENTATION SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
All repairs and maintenance to the waste collection, treatment, storage, and
transmission structures shall be documented in a maintenance and repair manual. The
operator shall keep an informal record, in chronological order, of all repairs made to the
waste management system or equipment. The certified operator should consult a
technical specialist in the event changes are made to equipment that will alter the
operating capacity of the waste management system. This maintenance manual shall be
made available to the Division of Water Quality at its request.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919 946-6481
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM [phone]
SWCD [phone]
N RCS K919, 583-3481
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at
this facility. The following are some action items you should take.
Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible,
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
a. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rules for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks -possible action.
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.

2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a.
Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b.
Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c.
Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property
damage?
d.
Did the spill leave the property?
e.
Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.
Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g.
Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off the property)?
h.
How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a.
Contact company person:
Senior Production Mgr. - M. Miles H - [phone], W - [phone]
Complex Mgr. - Kelvin Terry H - [phone], W - [phone]
Farming Mgr. -Alvin Lane H - [phone], W - [phone]
b.
During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office. Phone [phone]. After hours, emergency number:
919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your name, facility,
telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above, the exact
location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under
taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
c.
If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone
Number 919-536-6545.
d.
Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
e.
Contact local SWCD office phone number 919-583-3481, and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number 919-583-3481.
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -
site damage.
a. Contractor's Name: Johnny Sykes
b. Contractor's Address: Conway. INC
c. Contractor's Phone: [phone]
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon and/or Waste Utilization
Plan. (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: Rudy Gra__rnmer
b. Phone: [phone]
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan
to keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.

Swine Farm Wasle Management Odor Conlrol Checklist
Storer (':Ill+c 13M1•10 to Alinimiie ndtrs Site Sµecill(' Pracli.es
1a1u1;1.aJ ----�. ��._-�++inC I1r(xluclitll I 1 Vegckuliv(: (1[ 1u>talCd huliCls; _ � _-----------
t I Recommended hest managenient practices;
I I 11(xxl indetnull :uul C011n11(111 senie
. mmal lxklc sol lures
• Ilirlp manure -covered animals
Iloors
PI(I(II ills lace'.
. WCt Ilia IILlrC-C(11'e[ecI annuals
. lotled 11tIo s;
uAillefers located over slotted 11mrs,
l 1 Feeders at high end of solid Iltiors;
f I SCNIJ)e manure boildilp fr1101 Iloors;
Whide lour ventilation li}r iryiog
IaMIIIIC C I I CCIIIII I Intl v
• I Itine.
U�rC(IIl(alt Illa[1111C ICHI Y1':II hj' I111S11, Jill r(:Cflatge,
• I allial microbial composition
or s •rape-
hl' Cltl(xN %volilalion
,�CIIIkI�ItµNl e\I1:(Il�l tllll�
• Volatile glues;
la- "MI Illa111 CWHICC,
I)ust
it-II'llk iCI11 am Ill(1\Yllle311
I11.1001 ill[ I:ICe5
1 )ust
nimalS;
'ashdonn bet1Ce(ai g mps ofanimals',
I I Feed additives;
l I Feeler covers;
LL-ke'd delivery doansixnu cmenders to feeler
- - -
covers
- - — - —
Hu,h bulks --
• Agitation of regcled lagwil
I I Flush hulk covers;
h(Ioid chile tanks Lire tilling
tl Emend lilt lines near hntlool oflailks loth
anti-si phan vents
1 111%h :Ills) s
AgItilion .lul lag 11,a%Ac,,%110
1 1I(1e11hHII hush with onset ll(xlr VC11i l,lliDil
coliyeyallye
P.it 1ec11mpc polill�
• Agtiallon Ill recycled tagoon
I I Fmcad recharge pule] to ilea[ bottom of pits 111111 anti -siphon 1'CINS
h(lui(I nhile Liss ore lillin (
I.III .11 ll11111\
AglWPM (IMi11g S111111) lilllk
.Illllpl lailk Covell
--fillip, and drawn llll
( Illlil(111 th.lin C011CC11(Itl
• Agllatl(In duting wastewtiter
! 3 llo,� covers
tr IuuLIitn 1k1\CS
conveyance

Source
Callse
MIN ill Minimize [hhirs SItC Sill'CllfC 1'1'UCOVV1
I-nd ol'tllaillpilwN m
Agil -ill iun dtIt i I I A %%asle%%illel
1 i I'\telid Ji.eh:u!<e Iwilll of piixa (irtdcl nealll
l:Aronn
cunl'(a-auce
lagoon litluid leVCI a
l .upoolI ;IN llarc;
• Volatile gas cli►issious;
tYl'ropet lagoon litplid capacilV:
• lliological nlising:
It CollCul lagoon su,Itup procedures:
Agitation
"illillillltl ill:ilallnll W11C11 pt1111I11nb'',
I I Millillilllll SIIII'aCC area-Itl-rolkit [it! ralin;
I Mechanical aeralion;
I I Novell Inolo ical addllives
Il l ig:lliull S1111111,1e1
• 1 ligh pressure ilgilalioiv.
-k) rriplle (N) illy %%':lys %%itll lilile Ilr ntl %kind;
nuiil+ s
• Wiud drill
I I kiiltimum recommended operating pressure.
jyf'uugt ilnake near lagnoll litplid Sill laCC.
hapix11i
^�
Soolalx 1,111)` of hasill
• Parlud microbial decollllxlSkllnll;
I I IIullUni or nudlewl loads 1gi
surlare
• h1l\irig %viiil(: Iilliug;
I I 'fan covcls;
• Agitation %%lieu empl}ing
I I Basin surl'itce luals of solids.
I I I'rtll'CI1 Ilinlnl+lCal atlthllCCs ()r ()\Id'JIllS
S011111! basil ;ul l;wc P;Irlial nlicrohiill decunllxlsilion; i i FMend drainpipe nutlet; mile leach htluid
• Mixing %%Ilile lilling; Icvcl;
• Agitation v lien euipll'iq I 1 Rellln%-C settled solids IgLI1;ilIt
N1,111lue, ;lull% or ,lu(lltc . Agilalino %%lien slireadinE; ^ I I Soil injeclinn ul'slilm-Isiudges; — —
splcadel oullels 0 Volatile gaps Clolssions I I Wash icsidual manure lionl spreatler ali::i use.
I i I'roven hinlogicill udtlillveS or omilanls
I lucovelcd ula$mle. Volatile gil-, enlissinns %%line I : soil irliectioll ol',lul I)/sludl;es
s)nirl OF S11111;e tin field timing 11 Soil ilkC01JU1lillinll %%ilhill •18 hrs;
sal lltccs I ! 1%pteall in thin Imililull IaNCIs Ilir rapid dl.% ille.
I I I'rM-01 %Bola gical a(ldiliWS or oxidanls
I )ead allilmil% • Carcass decomixlsltlon 'rONl' diSixlSilinli 01.C:IrCaiieS
I )ciul ;lmlllal; cass decomposilion I I Complete Coverilig ni ralcasses in burial pit;,
pts — — _ _ _ II I'rnlx:r Itl(at11111/C(1115l1"uCIk011 UI dlSpnsll Illy
tut illclakolS • Inc(Inl111CIC cnluhuslion 115econdal). slack huiners

Insect Control Clleciclist for Animal Operations
Source CULISC RAM, W Miaimiec t7durs Sile Specific Praclices
Liquid Sys[ nis
I In.Ai I illllcis • Acclailliktiun ul'sulids uSIJ sySlelrlS is il,;Sigr►ed anti ulk:rated Ituurine IISC of inSecrici&IC
sulliciently to W111Ore acculnlilaled solids liuni during spriuglsunmler
glitters as desigue,l. months
IlIrlannve bridging of aCgln►Ilhted Solids al Ituutilib lise of (odelllicidt:
ihschllrae }ear rulu►d.
I.alnioui mid i'u, • ('rusted tiuhdS I"aililaill lagoulla, scilling Ilasills and piss %%liege
pest breeding is apparent In inininiize Ole
crusting of solids to a deplh of nu inure than 6-
8 inches over more than 311;u ofsurlilce
1'.\,',iti�i1'e ��,a','I:d11e • Ijig vegetalt011 "ill'illaill vegetal►ve control al,iag ballksoh
it Ui1111 iUg0olh alld 011ler ilillhlllndniellls lli pft:%Vol
acelltill ILL lioil ofticcaying vegelalive uuillcr
along water's edge oil ilnpnln►dnleul's Ik:rimeler.
_ inn_• Sy'Icnls
hced,a; • I'ee,l spillage 1'' esign, upeli le and inailllalll Iced sysleots (e.g,, _
hunkers and Ironglis) its minimize the
acculuLila Iioil ul'decayil►g %�astage.
iydean up spillage oil a rouline basis (c g., 7-III
day interval .luring slimmer, 15-30 day nllel till
during; llinlerl.
I ccd tilol iil:e
• Acculmdaliuns of feed resi,laes
I Itedlic,: IlloISMIL: aerunullaluul wilhiu and
alOill►d ilnitie,liille Ik:rinleler of teed Aorlge
tlreaS by itsurillg drainage assay Isom sit.:
:nut/ur prot•i 11% adCCILMLe C0111alllllielt (e g ,
covered bin for hfewer's brain and siu►ilal Ilibh
luoislure grain prlklucis)
l I IIISlk:el lilt and remove or break up accumuh sled
solid, in tiller sllips arlwnd li:rd stodge as
Ileulul.

Smirce'. Cut"t
: IM11,11 I bAdIlig AIC;IN • Accuamlaliuns ui animal withi ;s
anal Ice d waslage:
)IN Al:ult Ic 111111,1111114 • AcCLIllllllitli011S of alulual yeasts
11A11'I, it) Miuinliec 01111n, _
I I F.lilninale: Jim alias Ihal Irap aloiSMIC ahsug
lends alit) 001Cl 10ca11013S ►1ht7rL Wash!
accMiltllates hail &SIIIl NLIILC by- a111111aIS is
lilt taint.
I +Ai,int.rin tune rows and lillcr strips arnuud
animal luOIelijig taus us Illiniali7e;
accumulations of ►►as es (I c., inspect for and
reaurVe: OF Isreak up aecutlullalcd solids as
1Ic:�'tl4d )-
I I Remove spillage un a rnnlinc Isasis (c g , 7-11I
dad' irllural during snlunitrf, 15-i0 tltly mlcl Val
during ►►inter) w1jerc Immure is loaded list laud
itlspli.alirns or disixssal.
I I P1116th: for adequale tlrainagL� around maame:
stmIllilcs.
I'I Irslxxl Iin arltl nluorc OF hrcak up accluuulatcd
Wades III Idler '.frills :Irouutt slockpiles and
manure htmtllirlt, areas '.IS Theeded.
Silt Specific I'ruclires

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Standing water around • Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities • Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto Poorly maintained access roads Pr Farm access road maintenance
public roads from farm
access
Additional Information: Available From
Swine Manure Management ; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU - BAE
Swine Produclion Facility Manure Management: Pit Reellarge - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 128-88 NCSU - BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88 NCSU - BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; EBAE 103-83 NCSU-BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU-BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33 NCSU - Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual NC Pork Producers Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
I
I
AMOC - November 11, 1996, Page 5 E

Mortality Management Methods
(check which mcthod(s) arc being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground %sithin 24 hours after knowledge of the death. The
burial must be at least 300 feet from any Flowing stream of public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
CItomplete incineration.
G In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design appro%-cd by the
Department of Agriculture.
G Any method which is in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make possible the
salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written
approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached).

.+
System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average
operating conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge
rates and application rates change over time as equipment gets older
and components wear. In particular, pump wear tends to reduce
operating pressure and flow. with continued use, nozzle wear results
in an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
You should be aware that operating the system differently than
assumed in the design will alter the application rate, diameter of
coverage, and subsequently the application uniformity. For example,
operating the system with excessive pressure results in smaller
droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the
sprinkler nozzle. Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase.
Plugged intakes or crystallization of mainlines will reduce operating
pressure. Operating below design pressure greatly reduces -the
coverage diameter and application uniformity.
For the above reasons, you should calibrate your equipment on a
regular basis to ensure proper application rates and uniformity.
Calibration at least once ever thr 's recommended.
Calibration involves�'o�feccttang and measuring flow at several
locations in the application area. Any number of containers can be
used to collect flow and determine the application rate. Rain
gauges work best because they already have a graduated scale from
which to read the application amount without having to perform
additional calculations. However, pans, plastic buckets, jars, or
anything with a uniform opening and cross-section can be used
provided the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a scaled
container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located
randomly throughout the application area at several distances from
sprinklers. For traveling guns, sprinklers should be located along a
transect perpendicular to the direction of pull. Set out collection
container 25 feet a art long the transect on both sides of the gun
cart. You s ould compute the average application rate for all
collection containers. You should also look for evidence of
nonuniformity of the application. On a windless day, variation
between containers of more. than 30 percent is cause for concern.
You should contagt your irrigation dealer or technical specialist
for assistance.

T.AapQue`st:. Maps: print
http://www.mapquest.conlL/maps/print.adp?mapdata=5SWr5yNjh48...
C04
A Send To Printer Back to Map
Roanoke Rapids NC
27870 US
Notes:
.......................................................... 11FW.�
Book a Hotel:
Save up to 70% on
Orbitx Savers Nationaridel
Book Nowt
All rights reserved. Use Subject to License/Copyright NAv� CCMs
This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to Its Content. User assumes all risk of use.
MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use.
Privacy Policy & Legal Notices cp 2003 MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 of 1 9/4/2003 11:26 AM

MapQuN: Maps: print
http:Hwww.mapquest.com/maps/print.adp?mapdata=5SWr5yNjh48...
Pr %, V, E- qs Tr, -
Send To Printer Back to Map
i
/ Roanoke Rapids NC
27870 US
Notes:
Back a Hotel:
Save up to 70% on
©rbitz Savers Nationwidel
Book Nowl.
All rights reserved. Use Subject to License/Copyright [iiwTE cr it
This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use.
MapQuest and Its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use.
Privacy Policy & Legal Notices © 2003 MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
I of 1 9/4/2003 11:26 AM

R1 DATE/TIME :JUN. -?0' 03(FRI) 11:1.8
jUN-20-2003-FRI 1`i;35 PM NPD USA
252- 537 9798
FAX No. 252 537 9798
P. 001
P. 001
SMITHFIELD Premium Genetics
385 Hwy 158
Roanoke ,Rapids, NC 27870
Fax: [phone]
DATE: a
TO; Sr
FROM*
RZEFERENCE: fj�'� G19i2�
N'-CTMBER OF PAGES: (including Cover Sheet)
If you do not receive WJ pages of this fax eall: [phone] ext

Rl ►J.n`PEI'1 ME JUN. -20` 03(PFi1) �, : 28 �? �1 979S P. 002
iiiN-20-2003-FR I 1 2: 3; PM NPD USA FAX No. 252 537 9798 P 002
i
Smithfield Premiurti enetic s (S- )
3855figh-way 158,1{oanokg Rapids,1(C, USA .27870
TeCep: [phone] �: (252) 5379798
CEftu&T: [phone] E-mait: don,ros*@spdetitics.com
FROM Don 9�osie 11
i To: ,.rD. fester
C.C. 7,-raig Westerbeef, Yohn, Carter, R,o6ert -Moana
Date: 6120103
Topic: -WEEBOA!kD
Dear Mr, Hester our current freeboard readings a•.-e:
Farm 50 — 49"
Farm 61 — 3" "
Farm 62 -- 24"
Farm 63 30"
Reduced water consumption arid good fortune allowed our farms to miss some of the scattered
showers, which have helped our levels. I look forward to the drier weather next week and maybe
for the rest of summer.

Waste Management Plan Changes
Facility 44 -z' Z
Farm . ._._
This farms Waste Management Plan has made the following changes:
Crop changes
❑ Wetted Acres
❑ Increased Acreage
❑ Decreased Acreage
❑ Changed Irrigation Design
❑ Change in Farm type
❑ PIan based on 3 Years On Farm Records
�ther
Comments:
13--'� -a3
Date
nf,
ti�^R

a- i
Murphy -Brown, LLC 08/09/2003 P.O. Box 856
4 z-Z+ Warsaw, NC 28398
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
Murphy -Brown, LLC
SPG Farm 62 Amendment
county: Halifax
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 500
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Application Method:
Anaerobic Lagoon
>180 days
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent poll
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be u,
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyze
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
1 of 8

Reception Area Specifications
I
Field Irrigated Soil Ist Crop Time to IstCrop IstCrop LbsN/Ac Lbs N Total lbs N
Acreage T ype Code Apply Yield lbs N/Unit Residual lAc Utilized
Rolm
�Tract
3(a) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized I unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 Ibs N 1 bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 Ibs N 1 ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 Ibs N 1 ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.25 Ibs N / bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 Ibs N / ton
F
Cotton
0.12 Ibs N 1 Ibs lint
G
Fescue- Grazed
50 Ibs N 1 ton
H
Fescue- Hay
50 Ibs N I ton
I
Oats
1.3 Ibs N 1 bushel
J
Rye
2.4 Ibs N 1 bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 Ibs N 1 acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 Ibs N 1 acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 Ibs N 1 cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 Ibs N / bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 Ibs N 1 bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 Ibs N 1 acre / yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4of8

Additional Comments:
The acreage listed on this amendment is the balance of the total field acreage
minus the wetted acres at this site. The areas not covered by the conventional
Irrigation system are being entered into the pumping records as sub fields
so that the acres can be claimed when making application with an Aerway
machine.
7of8

AM-20-2003—WED 05-06 PM NPD USA FAX No.252 537 9796 P.0Q3
E
Aug 20 03 0415rp MURPHY-BROWN 91D2933138
• P. 8
I
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: SPO Farm 62 Amendment
Owner. Murphy -Brown, LLC
Owner/Manager Agreement:
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specfftcabons and the operation and
maintenance procedures established In the approved animal waste nutrient managemeni
plan for the farm named above. Uwe know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new Facilities,, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
Uwe understand that I must own or have ocems to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be avalable at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in -the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan wdl be filed on site at the form office and at the office of the local Sod and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of I
Signature
Name of Manager (iif different from owner):
Signature:
Date
Name of rachnical Specialist:
Dawn Williamson
AtIitiation:
Murphy-Brown�LLC _
Address:
^�
2822 _ft 24 West, PO Drawer 856
Warsaw HC 28M
Telephone:
910 Z93-3434
Signature.
'& 9-03

6990W91 i 00e w

Murphy -Brown, LLC
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
4/22/2005
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
Murphy -Brown, LLC
SPG Farm 62
County: Halifax
Farm Capacity:
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 500
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Storage Structure:
Storage Period.
Application Method:
2822 Hwy 24 West
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28396
44a -a
7
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
Anaerobic Lagoon
>'180 days
Irrigation
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3, Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
RECEIVED / DENR / DWQ
1 of 8 Aquifer ProtPrtion Sertiofl
MAY 14 2009

This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. In some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, f} tons, etc.):
CaRacity Type Waste Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
3212 gal/yr
gallyr
Farrow to Feeder
4015 gallyr
gallyr
500
Farrow to Finish
10585 gallyr
5,292,500 gallyr
Wean to Feeder
223 gallyr
gallyr
Feeder to Finish
986 gallyr
gallyr
Total 5,292,500 gallyr
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (Ibs): "based on site specific data
.Capacity Type Nitrogen Produced per Animal Total
Farrow to Wean
5.4 Ibs/yr
Ibs/yr
Farrow to Feeder
6.5 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
500
Farrow to Finish
10.93 Ibs/yr
5,465 Ibs/yr
Wean to Feeder
0.48 Ibslyr
Ibslyr
Feeder to Finish
2.3 Ibs/ r
Ibs/yr
Total 5,465 Ibs/yr
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
LAND UTILIZATION SUMMARY
The following table describes the nutrient balance and land utilization rate for this facility
Note that the Nitrogen Balance for Crops indicates the ratio of the amount of nitrogen produced
on this facility to the amount of nitrogen that the crops under irrigation may uptake and utilize
in the normal growing season.
Total Irrigated Acreage: 58.99
Total N Required 1st Year: 14551.75
Total N Required 2nd Year: 0
Average Annual Nitrogen Requirement of Crops: 14,551.75
Total Nitrogen Produced by Farm: 5,465.00
Nitrogen Balance for Crops: (9,086.75)
The following table describes the specifications of the hydrants and fields that contain the crops
designated for utilization of the nitrogen produced on this facility. This chart describes the size,
soil characteristics, and uptake rate for each crop in the specified crop rotation schedule for this
facility.
2of8

-Reception
AcMage__Typq_ Code— Apply Yleld lbs N-/Untt Residual fAc Utilized
��
N■■■�
■■■■�
��
��
��
��
��
r�■��
err
�
���
��
�
�
��
��
��
�
s(s) of 8

This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to Interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
CROP CODE LEGEND
Crop Code
Crop
Lbs N utilized 1 unit yield
A
Barley
1.6 lbs N 1 bushel
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
50 lbs N I ton
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
D
Corn - Grain
1.26 lbs N 1 bushel
E
Corn - Silage
12 lbs N 1 ton
F
Cotton
0.12 lbs N 1 lbs lint
G
Fescue - Grazed
50 lbs N 1 ton
H
Fescue - Hay
50 lbs N 1 ton
I
Oats
1.3 lbs N 1 bushel
J
Rye
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
K
Small Grain - Grazed
50 lbs N 1 acre
L
Small Grain - Hay
50 lbs N 1 acre
M
Grain Sorghum
2.5 lbs N 1 cwt
N
Wheat
2.4 lbs N 1 bushel
O
Soybean
4.0 lbs N I bushel
P
Pine Trees
40 lbs N 1 acre 1 yr
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste.
4 of 8

SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The following table describes the annual nitrogen accumulation rate per animal
in the lagoon sludge
Farm Specifications
PANT rlanimal Farm Totall r
Farrow to Wean
0.84
Farrow to Feeder
1
500 Farrow to Finish
4.1 2050
Wean to Feeder
0.072
Feeder to Finish
0.36
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 2050 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year will accumulate in the lagoon
sludge based on the rates of accumulation listed above.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 10250 pounds of plant
available nitrogen to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermuda grass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 34 acreas of land. If you apply the sludge
to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 82 acres of land. Please note that these
are only estimates of the PAN produced and the land required to utilize that PAN. Actual values
may only be determined by sampling the sludge for plant available nitrogen content prior to application
Actual utilization rates will vary with soil type, crop, and realistic yield expectations for the specific
application fields designated for sludge application at time of removal.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
`This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for >180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of -the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
5of8

Application Rate Guide
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Soil
Application Rate
Application Amount
Tract H!rdrant Type
crop
in/hr
" inches
_
1291 1 A Gritney
C
0.5
1
1 B Gritney
C
0.5
1
2A Gritney
C
0.5
1
2B Gritney
C
0.5
1
3 Gritney
C
0.5
1
4A Gritney
C
0.5
1
4B Gritney
C
0.5
1
Reid Lease 5A Gritney
H
0.5
1
5B Gritney
H
0.5
1
6A Gritney
H
0.5
1
6B Gritney
H
0.5
1
7 Gritney
H
0.5
1
8A Gritney
H
0.5
1
8B Gritney
H
0.5
1
9A Gritney
H
0.5
1
9B Gritney
H
0.5
1
10 Gritney
H
0.5
1
1291 sub1 Gr tney
C
0.5
1
Reid Lease sub2 Gritney
H
0.5
1
6of8

Additional Comments:
The acreage listed on this plan as subfields is the balance of the total
field acreage minus the wet acres at this site. This acreage will be
claimed when making application with an aerway machine. This acreage
is optional for this plan.
0,
7of8

04-27-2005 10:51 5PG 2524152695 PAGE2
NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: SPCA Farm 62
Owner Murphy -Brown, LLC
Manager:
OwnerlManager Agreement:
Ilwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above_ Ilwe know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
llwe understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 26 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Murphy Brown., Li_C
Signature: '��
Date
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist: Dawn Williamson
Affiliation: Mur h -8rown LLC.
Address: 28822 Hwy 24 Wes14 PO Drawer 856
Warsaw NC ,28396
Telephone: [phone]
Signature:
Borg.
Date
—z7--'o
Date

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer
does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide
evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the
owner of the waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Utilization Plan
when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of
application, recieving crop type, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for
other nutrients.
4 Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste
may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but less than 10 tons
per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (See
USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land application field.
6 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur
during a season prone to flooding (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff
does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8 Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1 of 3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
9 Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is
not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage
from animal waste should also be considered.
10 Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients.
Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11 Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following:
The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary
and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,
1995, shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14 Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15 Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainadeways, or wetlands by
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland
provided the fields have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist'. Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16 Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2of3

NUTRIENT UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
17 A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc.,
are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed
and accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18 If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19 Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
20 Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct
human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human
consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further applications of animal
waste during the crop season.
21 Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the
temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be
managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least annually
at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining
nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied based on other nutrients,
resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soil shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum crop
production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum of five years.
Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five
years.
23 Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina regulations.
3of3

Farm 7.'-.
Scale: 1 "=3(
), offset
Wells w
Lagoon

F ,aF-M LZ
NORTH CAROLINA
FARM LEASE AGREEMENT
HALIFAX COUNTY
THIS FARM LEASE AGREEMENT made and entered into this the 10`h day of December
2003, by and between ALICE PARTIN REID (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), 218 King George
Road, Greenville, NC 27858; and MURPHY-BROWN, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Tenant"),
2822 Hwy. 24/50 West, Warsaw, NC 28398.
WHERAS, Owner is the owner of certain lands, Premises and improvements designated on
the attached aerial photograph identified as Exhibit A — Tax Parcel 04-021.02; containing 94 acres
more or less.
AND WHEREAS, Tenant desires to farm the approximately 35 acres of cleared land and
install an eight inch PVC pipeline across Owner's property and to bury the same approximately four
feet underground to transfer waste waste and effluent from the adjoining swine facility to designated
spray fields. Tenant also desires to lease the remaining wooded land to maintain exclusive hunting
rights during the leased period.
(
AND WHEREAS, Owner and Tenant have negotiated such terms, conditions and stipulations
and now desire to memorialize the same as established by the terms, conditions and stipulations as
hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the Premises, the suzn of Ten Dollars
($10.00) in hand paid to each party by the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby is
acknowledged and by the mutual promises, covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties
hereby do hereby covenant, stipulate and agree as follows:
TERM OF THE LEASE: The initial term of this Lease shall be for a period of ten (10)
years commencing the 1.Oth day of December, 2003 (the "Inception Date"), and ending the
31 st day of December, 2013.
2, INITIAL TERM RENT FOR CROPLAND: Tenant shall pay to Owner rent for the
initial term of ten years, $16,800.00, due and payable as follows:
a. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2004.
b. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2005.
c. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2006.
d. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2007.
( e. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2008
f. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2009
g. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2010
h. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2011
i. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2012
j. The Sum of $1,680 due and payable on or before December 1, 2013

3. INITIAL TERM RENT FOR HUNTING RIGHTS: Tenant shall -pay to Owner rent for
the initial term of five years, $6000.00, for the exclusive rights for ingress and
regress to all land and the hunting rights for all non cropland, for the first five years of this
lease, such payment will be due and payable as follows:
a. The Sum of $1,200.00 due and payable on or before December 1, 2004.
b. The Sum of $1,200.00 due and payable on or before December 1, 2005.
c. The Sum of $1,200.00 due and payable on or before December 1, 2006.
d. The Sum of $1,200.00 due and payable on or before December 1, 2007.
e. The Sum of $1,200,00 due and payable on or before December 1, 2008.
4. RIGHT TO RENEGIOTIATE THE HUNTING RIGHTS: Owner reserves the right to
renegotiate the annual hunting rights at the end of the first five-year term. At the end of the
first five-year term both parties will have the right to renegotiate the payment and terms of
any additional or fitrther hunting rights for the non -cropland. Tenant shall retain all
hunting right for the cleared land during the ten-year farm lease agreement.
5. ENVIRONMENTAL: Tenant shall not permit, allow, or cause any act to be performed or
Any practice to be adapted or followed in and about the Premises which shall cause or be
likely to cause injury or damage to any person or to said Premises or to other property or
any persons. In no case shall Tenant cause or allow waste water effluent to be discharged
or released onto Premises. In addition to Owner's other remedies, Tenant agrees to
indemnify and hold Owner harmless from against any and all loss, liabilities, damages,
injuries, interest, deficiencies, fines, penalties, costs, expenses attorney(s)' fees and costs of
investigation and clean up including, without limitation, to claims, suits and proceeding by
Federal, State, County and local governmental authorities with respect to, or as a direct or
indirect result of the presence on or under, or the escape, seepage, leakage, spillage,
discharge, emission, discharging or releasing from, the property any wastewater effluent, if
such occurs, during the term of this Lease or during any extended period.
6. STRUCTURAL CHANGES: Tenant shall not construct any additional improvements
Upon the Premises except the underground pipeline. At the expiration of the tem of this
Lease, upon demand by Owner, Tenant, at Tennant's sole cost and expense, shall remove
all underground equipment placed upon the Premises by Tenant, including, but not limited
to underground pipes. At the option of Owner, at the expiration of the term of this Lease or
earlier termination, Owner may retain all underground pipelines on the Premises, in which
event all underground piping shall become the property of Owner.
7. PROPERTY TAXES: Owner will be responsible for all county and state property taxes
due on the property.
8. ASSIGNMENT AND SELLING OF PREMISES: Tenant shall have the right to assign
This lease or the sublet the Lease. Owner shall have full authority to assign this lease, to
mortgage, lease or sell his property. Tenant agrees to subordinate this Lease to such
mortgage, lease or sale.
9. MEMORANDUM OF LEASE: Owner agrees to sign, for recording at the Halifax County
Courthouse, a Memorandum of Lease.

10. BINDING EFFECT: This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs,
assigns, personal representatives and successors in interest, This Agreement may be
executed in one or more counterparts each of which shall be deemed to be an original.
AGREED to this the 10`h day of December, 2003.
IX�LC.Li c (SEAL)
Alice Partin Reid. Owner/
Murp4y-B#owA LLC, Tenant
NORTH CAROLINA
PITT COUNTY
1, a Notary Public of Pitt County, North Carolina, do hereby certify that ALICE PARTIN
REID, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing
LEASE for the purpose therein expressed. Witness my hand and notaries seal this day of
December 2003. My commission expires: k�b 17
(Notary Seal)
�Itary P is
NORTH CAROLINA
FAnyr COUNTY
IkYV4 Wes�er(ote.K
I, a Notary Public of Duplin County, North Carolina, do hereby certify that EQN ROS , a
manager of MURPHY-BROWN, LLC personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the
due execution of the foregoing LEASE for the purpose therein expressed. Witness my hand and
notaries seal this Af� day of December 2003. My commission expires: OcA - IS, -a
(Notary Seal)
Notary Public
A

ol'
Pi" "L
rt
,6L .... ..
i� t TI
h
1�111:,if N f,
in'll"t, 41 ti�
m
v
qo,,W,r�
Wz 4-4
ao�
Irrj ra.z Mlw vjt�