420007_PERMIT FILE_20171231

?1X 4e--
Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon CIosure Report :Form\
(Please type or print all iniormauon that does not require a sic!nacurep `�-� `t
General Information-`�,
cr
Name of Farm: Facility No:
Owner(s) Name
Mailing address
Operation Description (remaining animals oniv):
O Please check this box if there wiR be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure. please provide the fo+lowing information on the animals that wiill r". ain.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine ,No. ,of Animals Type o' Poultry
Wan to Feeder .1 Laver
der to Finish ZP40_ J Nile's
Z) Farrow to Wean -
.) Farrow to Feeder
iVo. of Animals
Type of CaWe
�Dais
J Beef
No. of.Animals
0 Farrow to Finish Other Type of Livestock: ;Number of Animals:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the ?H .4217 threshold? Yes vo C!
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes?
Yes -a"�No :)
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?:
{�Vame}�T�r _ 7v✓�l __ _ of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division
of Water Quality's w R Regional Office (see map on back)
was contacted on 9 9 {dare} for notification of the pending closure of this o d or lagoon.
Phis notification was at east 24 hours prior to the start of closure which began on B 49 {date}.
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan which meets
all MRCS specifications and criteria. I realize that I wiII be subject to enforcement action per Article 21
of the North Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land
Signatur
t): C i�
ri
Date:_ __9/2z
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the MRCS Technical
Guide Standard 998. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste
liquids and sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been
removed, all slopes have been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
dame of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ L':-) (/y _ ` " C-t r .
Affiliation: US -) ?I^ 6'' C
Address (agency): 1� c-3 i (C. ? ?-92 9 Phone No.:
1
Sitmature.. Dace: q Z2 9
eturn zrl[tztn dav5 E01 ow[n7 comp etton or animul water storage pony or lagoon c aSure to:
V. C. Division Of Water Quality- Water Quality Section
Compliance Group -
P.U. Box ?'}-J
Ralei-,h. NC 2 ; F26-0- 3-
PLC - 1 Mav 141;t�

j �0F W A TFRQ
r
August 23, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Craig Perry
890 Bynum's Bridge Road
Scotland Neck, NC 27874
Subject: Notice of Violation
Perry Hog Farm
Permit Number: NCA242007
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Perry:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Moss Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
This is to notify you of violations of your NPDES Swine Waste Permit Number NCA242007.
On August 9, 2004, Mr. J.D. Hester from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance
inspection of the subject animal facility. This facility has been closed for approximately 1 year.
No hogs were on site at this time. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to determine
compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge rules. Below are the items revealed as a
result of the inspection:
No sludge survey has been performed by this facility for this year. Section III. 15, states" All
facilities, which are issued a COC to operate under this permit, shall conduct a survey of the
sludge accumulation in all lagoons within one (1) year of receiving the COC and every year
thereafter." This survey should have been submitted in late April 2004. Upon further inquiry, a
Phosphorous Loss Assessment must be conducted on this facility and submitted to this office.
You are requested to send this information to this office as soon as possible. Please contact your
local soil and water conservation district for any assistance you may require with these issues.
The irrigation fields were in poor condition. There were significant bare spots and weeds
observed in all irrigation fields. Section II. 2 states, " A vegetative cover shall be maintained as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) on land application fields
and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP." You are required to maintain these fields in
accordance with your CAMWP. Please take immediate steps to reseed and/or establish an
adequate vegetative cover in your irrigation fields. In addition, areas around the lagoon and
buildings need to be mowed.
No calibration records were on -site at the time'of the inspection. Section Il. 24, " All waste
application equipment must be tested and calibrated at least once a year."
The confinement house closest to the lagoon was completely damaged and needs to be rebuilt
before any new hog are brought on site. Recent weather has caused the roof to collapse. The other
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-877.623-6748 N ne Carolina
3800 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Intemet http;IIh2o.enr.state.nc.us Xturall
An Equal OpportuniglAiBrmative Adion Employer— 5D% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper J

Perry/NOV
Page-2
cant.
buildings were reviewed and appeared to be in fair condition. All construction debris, insulation
and all associated appurtenances observed should be removed and disposed of properly.
You may wish to contact your local county soil and water conservation district office, county
extension office, a qualified technical specialist, and/or a professional engineer for any assistance
you may require in this matter. Please respond to this notice, in writing, within 15 days of receipt.
If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call Mr. J.D.
Hester at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
Jay peran, L.G.
Regional visor
cc: DWQ Central Files
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Halifax County Health Department
Ms. Betsy Gerwig/ DSWC-RRO
file copy

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
5
FROM: Shannon Langley
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MAR 5 I99&
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number
Any comments that the regional office can provide on the issuance of a special agreement to this
facility by the EMC would be greatly appreciated. Please provide any comments in writing (e-
mail messages are acceptable) to me as soon as possible.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
P.O. Box 29536, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility):
2. Facility No.: ¢Z— 7
3. Facility Name:
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
5. Mailing Address:
City:
¢.2/
State:, Zip: Z 7� 7
Telephone No.: ( 9, � ) U 24,' — �j
6. County where facility is located: AI
7. Operation Typ Swin Poultry, Cattle):
8. Application Date: zz/o
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1.997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 1 of 4

2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a' certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Fundsexpended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
/� /
�'�r,rJ;aC ��r' •;.,,- � arc
� r
FORM SPAG 1/98
G
Page 2 of 4

H. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility., The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
elal/
/,n
nj f✓JeJ/t
r�S f/���1
t�G���T�u�l
a'e'//z+-/'�r
�-�/ � � rives._ �S,-1._ �..r- .�,;'"-✓r,� /r• �,��
AppIicant's Certification:
t
attest this application for a Special Agreement
with -the E has been iewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knw,vledge. underst d if all rg uired arts of this application are not com leted and if all
this document removes my responsibility and liability for complying with all North Carolina
General Statutes end Regulations. I understand that the failure to meet any dates that are agreed
upon b ' myself and the EMC will result in appropriate enforcement actions being taken by the
EMC.
Print Name
/ Date ,�—
Signature t7owner
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 3 of 4

It-
Jn Ln

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 1 of 8
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Feb 18, 1998
Halifax County (Halifax) Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
O1/01/92 - 02/18/98
Client Name: Perry, Craig
Business Name:
Business ID:
Client Address
------------------------------
Rt 1 Box 431
Scotland Neck, NC
27874-9132
Client Phone Ext Description
919-537-5665 BUS
919-826-4766 HOME
Business Address
------------------------------
Business Phone Ext Description
NOTES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: 708 Date: 01/23/98
Note:
Working on transfer pump sizing for catch basin to new lagoon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type:
Technical Assistance
Assisted By:
JYC
Fund ID:
CS
Date:
01/07/98
Note:
Revising tracts
and preparing CIS estimate
for NCACS.
--------------=-----------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type:
Technical Assistance
Assisted By:
JYC
Fund ID:
708
Date:
12/23/97
Note:
Construction check
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
on Hog operation.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 2 of 8
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Feb 18, 1998
Halifax County (Halifax) Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
01/01/92 - 02/18/98
Client Name: Perry, Craig
Business Name:
Business ID:
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: 708 Date: 12/22/97
Note:
Checked on operation for 0200 certification.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: 708 Date: 12/18/97
Note:
Site visit, checking Hog Operation for irrigation and 0200 certification.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: 708 Date: 12/17/97
Note:
Checking installation of irrigation system.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: 708 Date: 12/16/97
Note:
Working on operation for 0200 certification.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: 708 Date: 12/15/97
Note:
Working on 0200 certification for Hog Operation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: CTA Date: 12/12/97
Note:
Layout of irrigation system on T-5490

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Halifax County (Halifax) Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
01/01/92 - 02�/18/98
Client Name: Perry, Craig
Business Name:
Business ID:
Page 3 of 8
Feb 1B, 1998
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JE
Fund ID: 708 Date: 12/11/97
Note:
Worked on revising waste management plan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: 708 Date: 11/24/97
Note:
Site check operations for 0200 certification.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JWS
Fund ID: CTA Date: 09/10/97
Note:
Site check out at Craig Perry place to see if he fixed leaks around
buildings.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type:
Technical Assistance
Assisted By:
WDE
Fund ID:
708
Date:
08/07/97
Note:
Went over Mr. Perry's
closure plan, checked
required specifications/
maps and fields
for land application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type:
Technical Assistance
Assisted By:
WDE
Fund ID:
CTA
Date:
08/05/97
Note:
Sent letter with
information on perennial grass practices for
maintenance
and seeding.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Halifax County (Halifax) Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
01/01/92 - 02/18/98
Client Name: Perry, Craig
Business Name:
Business ID:
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance
Fund ID: 7CS
Page 4 of 8
Feb 18, 1998
Assisted By: JWS
Date: 07/07/97
Note:
Site check with Division Engineers to evaluate Irrigation
Systems needs
and 0200 certification survey update.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance
Assisted
By:
JWS
Fund ID: CS
Date:
05/13/97
Note.
Discussed with Mr. Perry his Animal Waste
Management Plan
and
funding
available thru Cost Share.
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance
Assisted
By:
JYC
Fund ID: 708
Date:
01/06/97
Note:
Construction check on irrigation system.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 5 of 8
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Feb 18, 1998
Halifax County (Halifax) Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
01/01/92 - 02/18/98
Client Name: Perry, Craig
Business Name: Perry, Craig
Business ID: perrca
Client Address
------------------------------
Rt 1 Box 431
Scotland Neck, NC
27874-9132
Client Phone Ext Description
919-537-5665 BUS
919-826-4766 HOME
Business Address l
------------------------------
Rt 1 Box 431
Scotland Neck, NC
27874-9132
Business Phone Ext Description
919-826-4766 HOME
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: WDE
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 01/07/98
Note:
Designed closure plan for old lagoon.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: RL
Fund ID: CTA Date: 11/12/97
Note:
Reporting progress on T-5489 waste management maintenance and
installation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: CTA Date: 10/01/97
Note.
Reviewed Irrigation Plan on T-5489.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 6 of 8
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Feb 18, 1998
Halifax County (Halifax) Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
01/01/92 - 02/18/98
Client Name: Perry, Craig
Business Name: Perry, Craig
Business ID: perrca
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JWS
Fund ID: CTA Date: 09/02/97
Note:
Inspected Mr. Perry's facility site for discharge and Waste structure
areas.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: CTA Date: 08/18/97
Note:
Sit down with Mr. Perry to discuss options on an Irrigation plan with him
on T-5489.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: CS Date: 02/06/97
Note:
Sent info. for Craig Perry Hog Operation to Tom Crockett Irrigation Inc.
at request.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: CS Date: 02/06/97
Note.
Sent info. for Craig Perry Hog Operation to Revelle Agri Products, Inc.
at request.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: CS Date: 02/06/97
Note:
Sent info. for Craig Perry Hog Operation to Brock Equipment Co. at request

T.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 7 of 8
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Feb 18, 1998
Halifax County (Halifax) Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
01/01/92 - 02/18/98
Client Name: Perry, Craig
Business Name: Perry, Craig
Business ID: perrca
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JE
Fund ID: CS Date: 02/05/97
Note:
Tract# 3633, talked with Mr. Perry about cost share contract.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JE
Fund ID: ACP Date: 01/27/97
Note:
Mr. Perry came into the office to find out information concerning his
animal operation ACP c/s plan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JWS
Fund ID: CS Date: 02/14/95
Note:
Went over seeding rates with Mr. Perry and how to munch his Lagoon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: CS Date: 09/06/94
Note:
Ran preliminary finals on hog lagoon and found top width and elevations
to be lacking on 9/1/94. Called Mr. Perry and Johnny Little to let them
know. Mr. Little came in to the office on 9/6/94 to see what he could do
to get the job right.We met him on site to go over problem areas.He
completed needed work to specs. and moved off the job.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: JYC
Fund ID: CS Date: 08/29/94
Note:
Arrived on site and ran preliminary finals for contractor, most of the
top elevation was within 0.2`. we also ran full x-sections on width and
length to check sideslopes . Also tried to give contractor an idea as to
how much yardage was excavatedfor undercut. Approx. 114 x 270 x 1.9
=58482/27 =2166 yds. cube.

U.S.'DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 8 of 8
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Feb 18, 1998
Halifax County (Halifax) Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
01/01/92 - 02/18/98
Client Name: Perry, Craig
Business Name: Perry, Craig
Business ID: perrca

y
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAEL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Craig Perry
Rt 1 Box 431
Scotland Neck NC, 27874
Dear Craig Perry:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
September 11, 1998
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Perry Hog Farm
Facility Number: 42-7
Halifax County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for
Special Agreement which was received on February 23, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with Craig Perry in order
to allow additional time for Craig Perry to obtain and implement a certified animal waste
management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this Ietter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates
and conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal
penalties, injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer Paper

i
Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 581 or Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
RRO Regional'Office
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
CKo11H11W&GIMIMMI�I:�:/
IN THE MATTER OF )
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 42-7
CRAIG PERRY
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Craig Perry, hereinafter referred to as "OWNER",
and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency of the State
of North Carolina created by G.S. 143E-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A.
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 2 L
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility'or liability for discharge's of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by October 1, 1998.

Farm Number: 42-7
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H ,0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the rdason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER'S" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

' Farm Number: 42-7
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Perry Hog Farm
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WQ Fax:[phone] Sep 3 '97 16:27 P.02/02
RECU OF COMMUNICATION WITH NC DOA -STATE VETERINARIAN
' Xhvision of Water (duality ❑ Division Of Soil and Water Conservation
Notircation of Improper Disposal of Animal Carcasses
Farm Name: Lel I Facility ID: C--qQ County:
Location:�D J .17 DlJ Gr IL � �` _-fiy�`�-,I` a, O
r< t q r+ 0 n ( P PS
Responsible Party / Owner's Name:.
Contact Narn�e: SA 'z- Addressrs:
Phone #_ vl 1 I ` 17-4 r y7 b City: J �- Zip:
On Site Representative Notified of Improper Disposal:
Name: A "" Phone #: Date / Time: _ 9� �/ 0,7
Response to notification:
Regional / District Office: 0'R'd Date/Time Carcasses Discovered: IV 97
lnspector's / Reviewer's Name: ll�rSF r'1L IdLJ G l _ Phone #:
Carcasses discovered discovered as a result of.
Pp
Com lainu Ins ection: � Operational Review: Other:
P
li%4•y;''`,'l
Animal Type: Number of Carcasses: 3 + Condition: - d [_c o� r o of • a>~
Locatiou(s) of Disposal Site: v- K,- r"3 e{ Fri/a� fig
Comments. "04&W4ra -�o / sh e. ,/ a�- "i) rug-f,o-t�- n �
�{Ms i3 A C+4�►any �lc•r•-�L, --
NC State Veterinarian Contact (Name): J"-..- -eS
Title: Phone: Date/Tirne:
Other agencies invulved/cuntacted. Name appropriate agency, give contact name, date and tirne.of contact.
cc; Facilities Assessment 61-oup
I=ile
Please send form to:
NC State Veterinarian -Department of Agri culture
Dr, Andy Mixson, Director of Animal f lealth
Agricultural Building
I W. Edenton Street
P.O. Box 26026
Raleigh, NC 27611
phone: [phone] fax: [phone]
r1

May 28, 2002
W. Craig Perry
Perry Hog Farm
890 Bynum's Bridge Rd.
Scotland Neck, N. C. 27874
NCDENR
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Attention: Mr. J. D. Hester
Dear Mr. Hester:
Re: Notice of Violation 1.9
Perry Hog Farm cOa
COC No. AWS420007 -
Halifax County
4- .►
I have met with NRCS in regard to the violation notice which we received
May 21 ' by certified mail. Mr. Will Mann has been out to the farm and will verify
that we have made every effort to comply with the stated requirements.
If you have any questions please contact me, or Will Mann at:
NRCS
P. O. Box 8
Halifax, N. C. 27839
Tel. # [phone] Ext. 3
Sincerely,
ems,
-c7 W. Craig Perry

D. 0. Box 8
Hlllfax, N. t; 27839
PH: 252y583
FAX [phone]
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
DATE: `� Q
ATTENTION: w
FAX:
FROM: A mon
,Resouree conservation Spectgbst
Number o f yaets (tneWly tht_s cover): :2L
COMMENTS: _
31
14

Y
sold WAttr $tto7t Dt .
Pa b BOX S
HA*Q�, N C n 27039-0008
(252 583-34,91 W. 3
April 30, 2002
J.D. Hester
NCDENR
1628. Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27.699-1628
Dear Mr, Hester,
This letter is in regard to the catch basin on the Craig Perry Hog Farm in -Scotland
Neck, N.C. 27874. There are no engineering specifications on the catch basin. .
We have always informed Mr. Perry that a freeboard of'.19 inches be maintained
on the catch basin. -We have also informed Mr. Perry that all dW animals are disposed of
properly,
1t is to the best of our knowledge that Mr. Perry has all:mquirc4 paperwork
including a Waste Utilization ,Plan for documenting the operation of his swine farm. In
his Waste Utilization Plan it clearly states what the level the freeboard be'maintaittcd and
how the dead anitnals should be disposed of.
In the past'wd as a field office have done all that we co�'Id. in. the assistanc.e,and' `
notification of any problems that we found on the Craig Perry. Swine firm, We ,feel that
Mr,.Perry is aware of what is required in order to remain in crn%phanco with all
environmental regulations.
Sincerely,.
Will Mann'
Fishing Creek, SWC.D :

r'
_ . ��ve%S.�c d... oU G.9�,G! ��.•4c1 . _ � �.1-'o,���ia�J _I�e.fie.Pt'-e� � ��,
Z'y loy Aee
R��r. �`r0.,�1�..�„_.l. N rF��tic,��•etil ���4;s�e - --�� � JI��e._ .�.va cc_1, - �e - ��au..,v�`y � RC,S

MEASUREMENT OF FREEBOARD
7=7
9 m1mmm
��mm
mommmmmmmm
immmm
�mmm

'�,i tli :': &,'^{i ,"^„ ,,I .,� ',' .• w'F'"i�"�ib !'t _..sae v 1 rr9.:: - -{ L, _
NCDN°A ron,OWlDivision '. 4300 Reed .Creek Road ry,RaIbi h, NG 277,6015
- ,.. Y..Y.= n4.;'`r =•
- (919)1,7,,33 2655 r :`
r..tiiu ^' " _
Re ort No 00710 ` !
Grower.,
Perry, Craig
890 Bynums Bridge Rd.
Copies to: County Extension Director
SWCD
`E
Soil
Test Re ort
Scotland Neck, NC 27874
Farm:
7/17/00 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS
Halifax Count
Agronomist Comments:
A 3
Field] nfoirmation
A ied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T A
Crop or Year Lime
N
W5 K20
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
131 Berm HaylPas,M
1st Crop: Small Grains 0
80-100
0 10-30
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop: Milo (Grain Sorg) 0
80-100
0 10-30
0 0
0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1) Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N Nfd-N Na
MIN 0.41 1.11 6.9 91.0
0.6 6.2 270 66 62.0 25.0
74
51 58 574
574
485
61
17
0.1
Field Information
A . ied Lime
Recommendations
;-
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N
W5 W
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
F1 Fes/OG/Tim,M
1st Crop: Small Grains 0
80-100
0 20-40
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop: Milo (Grain Sorg) 0
80-100
0 20-40
0 0
0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (7) Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
N(b-N Nfb-N Na
MIN 0.56 1.11 7.3 89.0
0.8 6.0 431 57 51.0 34.0
84
60 67 696
696
550
48
13
0.1

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Report No: W04388 W
Grower: Perry, Craig Copies To:
lK 890 Bynums Bridge Rd.
Scotland Neck, NC 27874
�tl aste nalyszs to Farm:
12/12/01 Halifax County
ample Info.
ample ID:
OP
Waste Code:
AILS
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
N ! P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu 8 Mo 0 C
Total
IN -N
-NH4
-NO3
111 I 21.3 757 148 45A 20.2 2.21 0.31 0.76 0.05 0.95
{ Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li qH SS C.N DM% CCE% ALE(Kgal)
ascription:
I OR N
165
8.01
wine Lagoon Liq.
Urea
ecommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs11000 alions
Other Elements
lbs/1000 allons
pplicatron Method
N Pz05 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn
Zn Cu B Mo Cl
Na Ni Cd
Pb A! Se Li
Irrigation
0.71 0.36 6.1 0.86 0.26 0.12 0.01 T
0.01 T 0.01
1.4
Please be sure to fill out the Waste Analysis Information Sheet completely. We need to know the type of waste (Waste Codes are listed on back of form), a
brief description, and Application Method(s) thatyou intend to
use (listed on lower, right
side of front). New and revised forms are available from your local cooperative extension office or from NCDA Regional Agronomist. For more detail please call 919/133-2655 and ask for the
Plant, Waste and Solution
Section. Thank you very much.
ample Info.
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
ample 1D:
N
P K Ca Mq
S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B
Mo CI C
LUD
Totai 231
168 786 301 136
58.9 41.5 2.70 7.23
8.14 1.07
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
ASS
-NO3
Na Ni Cd Pb
Al Se Li pH
SS CW
DM% CCE% ACE(K af)
escription:
OR-N
174
7.73
wine Lagoon Sludge
Urea
ecommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs17000 alIons
Other Elements
lbs11000 gallons
pplicatron Method
N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn
Zn Cu B Mo CI
Na Ni Cd
Pb Al Se Li
Irrigation
0.89 2.3 6.3 1.8 0.79 0.34 0.24 0.02
0.04 0.05 0.01
1.5

a r.
<
r
x`
WWI Q y 4
g
Nort
i^� ♦ y
YYrF'
V in
irk
�'4 � iX,b'P$�� 1 .P �.�/'��-����•`G-�C 7&�'� }'�3��r.+F� -s�°,i�c � . �p'�''..1.0 '� 1r ",�#�'�, ^�'. �,' '� .'d(,'
� rJ ��-t s �:•�� �`�'-�,��"`�;, + �r�„ �. � � �'��. .�t� fist.. yE���� ��'r_� �

� yk . �.-M, si,i i %' '�c.�y. _^`! � r����,� \ .. - ;��4r. �J,�� Y 'k r �i •
- .�.11F r'''' �• , rt? V f (f� {, -ii, �' 1 Y
-'�'" :,�:,;:�{- _ ~ ` .,,xis,: .�` rr•1 �, '� / �' f� r {�� ... - ,��y r:
IN
,r.. "4 ''
'f e
are y r � , f1 7 � \ i y: � �'•'��'.
• •� �^ 1 '�i� �t,,, a+-y �,, .i +�, sit '�!�: .h� .. + y i � 1
"alp Oe
vj
VT
J1 T �\ T � � {// Il y}..� � 55'SJI♦ ���� 11 -y Aryp��„M wy.` 1 „�� `J7 � P
y r AIJ l' . G•., y
i`'��Y�`�^•- V .iT;�•�1 �s � r.� r'j�l F �rjs+- yJ� "� ��f'•rn.
Y 'dt' �w ngJ��'��11
✓ ,-' rya,, `�, '�'•� .� 1y ,• ` j tiZ� , S r ^ fk "?- i 4,tp+' ` .ri u + �. ,.1 �� Aa s7 � tow,
� •� � V �' * r� h•�H 4¢'yJ�t ^ it ' " �% r '�" "'� � .r � r ` 1 f
_4.•+7' _/ � 3 +. .n.. �tF.A1 �. i.S '� � Y' i .rr�j,'�t �� •� r. - 4 .0
ti� 9 J +� . C4 ,ram � r fi `` .�. � "v;r�} ��r,-!., .,,,,.w • � .� Z`�'t.`�
1 '�Tr'P '`fi � ' l'i ,U.r;i,,J �'�e�`�, .4 a'1` •4'�) �'�r� •�... � �. . r.fl"S--
JS�F'� o°r �r �4 '�� � < �+"��Y .' • •�'�rp ;,ts 1 �� ' S f y �Y' ex : ,• cs,1 `
i. ���f � . •1 .3:'� 5� �1f�' "$ �S� der: ; �_��,, I UI.`1 ) ✓ ' y15 Jar ' sr�
� ryt��" -�``7� 't r,kt l�" ,"�y i\ Il \�� � :.�• . •r1' � \ _y.Vw�
ik�• SyZr'�r ' 1 �r „�"rf •} � .� ,13� r ��,� _ ._
t4 t ry 1✓ �!, \''- [', rr, �' t
r,4 r a
i ?� J;„^�'���• � `� ��, "'�`�'}��'-� rtr'i! � � .� LW � _ \� l U �; i.9.� ��,�' � `n � ltis ` rf! i�
�4} tJ,t�•l.�,R+`r ��c'i fiv°' rt'S'4 '� "�.�-,t.' �� w � /
�rjr
Yi
Ln
g 4t s, Will
i'Ily�yy�k d ltfy Lill
n��•, p Y` , r r'�'�n..:- a- r -'T� :'
� yl
fe AS
: OM/ u {
{ + �y?r7t „1 t� f� fl5 . a a• � "",r"��•"%' '4 �c/1 Jl_� 'hQi �J'' -. � _ / � ' 4 IM
9 11 „�; �i`l ! t• =''^ a�
,,,, ►Nil
o 4 x
r: ` -" ,.rf y"1 ' 3t '6 t " t �' t "`•q - f too i e•"'. "'tc1� i ' y
$7■y �.�sf+ t ;t -�t^�� a. J,� , � A' tirtq♦ � - I - � { + a-�Ii,`.5!4'>r >.
7 ti i ���k'� -�`4� jY }ti y 'f•Y +� -T •r+ y'rr '"T+�,�f rs�''. i
�� +}J. ?� °fir"• ��L r � '",r"� 1+�� ..tni ,,.,�, � � � 4. �ll.�`� I �i �. ,.•• ,.i �v�
. - • °I �•:ti7J���.�`�f 71�r Y.,! `, {, k,, i'ijt;�+ t �"�a^ y � Yti 'c�J - t •.+L' r..: a�pd�y��..y

FORM IAA-#
Farm Owner
Irrigation Operator
Lagoon Liquid'irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation -Events on Different Fields
E' Facility Number ? -
Date
f -
Size
- - Irrigation - — -
Number .
�.�
�
'%'Iilllls
Rr •
I/uIWO—
MUMMISM"HWUNOWd
♦
UMP /
WIM
�j
WAIM�
� I 4
� ..�
E1•
4
llm�w
W-1-4 m11rt►4�
�.r3Y:tia
momrom,wI
. ., .N'
�M�204=
.. -01=
ram
_
r
r

FORM IRA-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number -
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
Qblacrej = (B) �. b ram,
121 V..n (41 (51 is) M is) i91 flol Illf
Total Voltime
tl
i����
■■sir
s
Crop Cycle Totals I
-owner's Signature Operators Signature
Certified operator (Print) Operators Certification No
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRA-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract Field #1
,Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
a78-)d
Owner's Phone #f a
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone. #i
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Aecommended PAN Loading
M (Vacre)
1%% ral '!el lrl !RI T [Al tM 11M
NIP
1
Wj
:•�
SO
Crop Cycle Totals I
owners Signature Operator's Signature
Certified operator (Print) Operator's Certification No.<716
1 NCDA Waste AnaYlYsis or-Equivaleni or NRCS Estimaie, Technical Guide Sections 633,
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). 'Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM 1RR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
3
Owner's Phone # .
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Fiefd per Crop Cycle
Facility Number I i/. —
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN loading
(Iblacre) = (B)
"I M Id1 I41 191 M - M MI! Hm 1111
r I
ram#
`x a 12 Le A 099MMUN
r
++r
U.
Crop Cycle Totals
Owners Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) ` Operator's Certification No.
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) trom (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

6 5 NCDA Agrohoinic, Division, 43 00 Rcedy Creek Roaa-AANtr-, iikh,�-2.76o,7,76465�.--,±.919Y-733-.25: Z ftorfN0. 04388 W.
Grower: Perry, Craig Copies To:
890 Bynurns Bridge Rd.
Scotland Neck, NC 27874
A R �;
��� :jig
aste naiysis Ap-hort Farm:
IX
12/12/01 Halifax County -M�
1 ~ s .v -6
Sample LO:
N
P. K Ca —Mg S Fe Mn Zn CU B'- MO CI C
TO F. r'n ---�
Total 171
27.3 757 148 45.4 20.1 2.21 0.31 0.76 0.05 0,95
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4-
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li PH SS C.-N DM% CCE% ALE (Kgal)
ALS
-NO3
165 .8.01
Description:
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Lig.
Urea
jRe6In'-M' Mill 00001144
Othei'Ekeehis
plie
Ap aik4i-,qkbq, W- "Pz05��-- I z0,`�, -ea IN Na7. " �'PC14.1. , -4 - - x -- - 1, '-
M 10 '"6' '6 -'O.-86g;I,:- 0 0 1
0.3 L
gm -4 �z 0.26 12
-11614 -Itfi� I t& g�kkl6f -iF -f 11 �HcAtibnM�tfiod(i). t6l y66 inied&ff Waste ys!s_., e .4j'
Please be sure to fill oW�the-wa's` -ArW QW! t�:p f6M)�P rie'&kripti6fi and'Ap
f, 21. '6
fohn-S k NCDkReV66FAgr" 3 -and ask
use (Hoed o&ldwer, righ y6U-I" tooperaliVe eVeaSjofi'bMGe76j,'fFOM- oiomLst-;' or m666 &tafl-ol�ak cafl'919/7 3,2 55 f6r.ffie�.'
;X d Solution Smfi'- 116"N't-R
an on vefyffluch;."'
sel
Sample 1
N
1) K Ca —Mg S Fe Mn zn Cu B MO Cl C
Sl,i�M
Total 231
i68 786 301 136 58.9 41.5 2.70 7.23 8.14 1.07
Waste Code:
-NH4
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se M PH Ss C.-N DM% CCE% ALE (Kgajl
ASS
-NO3
174 7.73 1
Description:
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Sludge
Urea
-7777:
Elements
1!1&/1000
�O 5 S. " �� ..' "t
n'� "K20-'-'-,.Cd Mj
Appjiai��
Nd 'Al' "S
NaM' f f
'—�n 71* iR
'iff34-`�,,,0'124 0'04-
lrri ion 0
.
5
2i
6
%7 1
514 - 14

.............
61 AR
. .... ........
.......... .
C -6, 52655.-- . .......... ep _NCIDKAg�r' noniitk R ro &6'nr, . ..... 300 JZ66dy Creek. oad N 27607t� 455,. (9,19) 7,33: drt.No.
.......... -
Graver: Perry, Craig Copies to: County Fxtension Director
890 BYFIUMS Bridge Rd- SWCD
�Q� "'/� Scotland Neck, NC 27874
es"il es0 rt Farm:
7/17/00 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 i�A's Halifax County
Agronomist Comments:
A 3
FieldAnf6rfnation i2e�
A 131)
lied Li
ie inne
R rn dhd--t'
eco rn a ionsp�
v U�!
. ......... ..
. .. ..
...
MW
...
Sample No. Last Crop
Yr
Crop or Year
Lime
N
IW5
KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
BI Berm Hay/Pas,M
1st Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0
10-30
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop: Milo (Grain Sorg)
0
80-100
0
10-30
0 0
0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WIV CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-A (1) Mn-AI (2) 2n"17
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N Nfh-N
Na
MIN 0.41 1,11
6,9
91,0
0.6 62 270 66
62.0
25.0
74
51
58 574
574
485
61
17
0.1
Field'In forrnatiorv'-ram-
Appliod
Lime
Recofffftindatio-h-s .. ....
. . .......... .
.......... . ....
71
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N
W5
W
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
F1 Fes/OG/Tim,M
1st Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0
20-40
0 0
0
0
3
1
1 2nd Crop: Milo (Grain Sorg)
0
80-100
0
20-40
0 0
0
0
3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WIV CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 WAI(I)WAI(2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N Nfh-N
Na
MIN 0.56 1.11
73
89.0
0.8 6.0 431 57
51.0
34.0
84
60
67 696
696
550
48
13
0.1

f
State of North CarolinaINA,
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources A
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDEN'R
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary NORTH GROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NRruRAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 27, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN' RECEIPT REOUESTED
Mr. Craig Perry
890 Bynum's Bridge Road
Scotland Neck, NC 27874
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation for Enforcement
Perry Hog Farm
COC No. AWS420007
Halifax County
Dear Mr, Perry:
On December 12, 2001, Mr. Jarwin (JD) Hester conducted a compliance
inspection of the subject animal operation. Mr. Hester's inspection determined that
wastewater from your facility was not actively discharging to the surface waters of the
State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following violations were revealed:
1) Record keeping for this facility was very poor and needed improvement. The
IRR-2's were incomplete and improperly filled out. The PAN values used on MR -Ts
forms were not from the most recent waste analysis. In order to provide more accurate
nitrogen balance values the correct PAN values must be used. These records also must be
signed by the Operator -In -Charge (01C) designated for this facility.
2) As a permitted animal facility, you are required to have a copy of your weekly
freeboard records readily available for inspection to determine compliance with
conditions in your general permit. Freeboard records were not routinely recorded every
week. The most recent freeboard level was taken on 1/15/01.
3) No soil records were onsite at the time of the inspection. There were no waste
samples taken for this facility for the entire year of 2001. The operator should collect a
n
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity -Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110%post.con6umer piper

Perry
NOV
Page-2-
waste sample within a minimum of 60 days prior to land application of waste. A copy of
all records should be maintained by the permittee for a minimum of three years
4) Our records indicate that Mr. James Burnette is listed as the current certified
operator for this facility. You stated that Mr. Burnette was no longer the OIC of this
facility, however a new operator has not been designated. You should immediately
designated someone as the certified operator for this farm. If you need any assistance,
please contact the Technical Assistance and Certification branch at [phone] for
any question you may have concerning this issue.
The failure'to have an Operator -In -Charge (OIC) at your facility is a violation of 15A
NCAC 2H .0224. and is subject to civil penalties of up to $ 1,000,00.
Please respond to this Notice in writing within 10 days after the receipt. You response
should outline how youintend to correct the referenced violations, also include a copy of
all waste monitoring records for 2001. If you have any further questions regarding this
inspection, please call JD Hester at [phone] Ext. 335.
Sincerely,`�* , -?F t��
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
r. Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe/ DSWC-RRO
RRO Files

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
August 30, 1999
Mr. Craig Perry
890 Bynums Bridge Road
Scotland Neck, North Carolina 27874
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation To Enforce
Perry Hog Farm
Permit No. AWS420007
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Perry:
On August 24, 1999, Mr. Buster Towel] of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection at the subject swine facility. As a result of the
inspection, the following permit violations were noted:
The General Permit requires that a copy of the Permit and Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan be kept on site. Neither document was available during
the inspection.
The General Permit requires that a weekly freeboard level be recorded and kept
along with all other pertinent records concerning your swine operation. No
freeboard records were found.
The inspection revealed that there was no Operator In Charge (OIC) designated
for this facility.
Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) indicated that the windows for the land
application of wastewater to your fescue fields ranges from September through
May. Land application records showed that sludge had been applied to all of
your fields, including the three fields listed in the Plan as being in fescue, in mid
August. This is a violation of your Waste Management Plan for application of
waste outside the windows provided by the WUP.
SSOO BARR{LTT ORIVI[, SUITE 101, RALEIOH, NORTH CAROLINA 27909
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 50% RECYCLEW 10% PORT -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Craig Perry
Page 2
The inspection revealed that waste sludge from the recent closure of your old primary lagoon
had been applied to a parcel of land which was not listed within your Waste Utilization
Plan. All waste application from a permitted animal facility should be tied to a Tract and
fieldls within your WUP.
Prior to the inspection of your swine facility, your contractor, Mr. Tony Hale provided Mr.
Towell with an unsigned version of a lagoon closure plan which was dated 12-31-97.
The waste analysis for this plan showed that there was 6.7 lbs of Nitrogen per 1000 gallons.
Mr. Hale indicated that sludge from the closure of your lagoon was applied to all of the fields at
your farm and also on several fescue fields located on another Tract.
The application package for your General Permit that you submitted to the Division referenced
the lagoon closure and stated that sludge would be applied to corn, cotton, and wheat, on all
fields in Tract # 3633. This closure plan also stated that the closure would take a period of two
(2) years due to the lack of needed acres on Tract 3633.
It is apparent to the Raleigh Regional Office that the closure of this lagoon did not take two
years and that waste was applied to crops and parcels of land not included with the Waste
Utilization Plan within a period of about two weeks. We also have concerns that the closure
plan was written in 1997 and that no current composite sample was taken of the sludge or liquid
waste in the lagoon prior to closure.
The Raleigh Regional Office is considering recommending an enforcement action against you
for the above referenced permit violations. If you have justification that these violations were
caused by situations or circumstances beyond your control, you should include them with your
response. You should respond to this Notice in writing within fourteen days of your receipt. In
the absence of any justification, the Raleigh Regional Office will recommend to the Director
that an enforcement action be taken against your facility.
Please note that violations of your General Permit are violations of NCGS 143-215.1 and are
subject to civil penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per day , per violation.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice, please call Mr. Buster Towel at (919) 571-
4700.
4Sincerel
ennet chuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Mr. Jeff Dillard, Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil & Water Conservation District (Halifax)
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group

MUMP NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH RuGio YAL OPP=
Division of Water Quality
August 30, 1999
Mr. Craig Perry
890 Bynums Bridge Road
Scotland Neck, North Carolina 27874
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation To Enforce
Perry Hog Farm
Permit No. AWS420007
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Perry:
On August 24, 1999, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection at the subject swine facility. As a result of the
inspection, the following permit violations were noted:
The General Permit requires that a copy of the Permit and Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan be kept on site. Neither document was available during
the inspection.
The General Permit requires that a weekly freeboard level be recorded and kept
along with all other pertinent records concerning your swine operation. No
freeboard records were found.
The inspection revealed that there was no Operator In Charge (OIC) designated
for this facility. ,
Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) indicated that the windows for the land
application of wastewater to your fescue fields ranges from September through
May. Land application records showed that sludge had been applied to all of
your fields, including the three fields listed in the Plan as being in fescue, in mid
August. This is a violation of your Waste Management Plan for application of
waste outside the windows provided by the WUP.
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27009
PHONE [phone] FAX 919-E71-4718
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLEW10% PO5 r-CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Craig Perry
Page 2
The inspection revealed that waste sludge from the recent closure of your old primary lagoon
had been applied to a parcel of land which was not listed within your Waste Utilization
Plan. All waste application from a permitted animal facility should be tied to a Tract and
fieldls within your WUP.
Prior to the inspection of your swine facility, your contractor, Mr. Tony Hale provided Mr.
Towel] with an unsigned version of a lagoon closure plan which was dated 12-31-97.
The waste analysis for this plan showed that there was 6.7 lbs of Nitrogen per 1000 gallons.
Mr. Hale indicated that sludge from the closure of your lagoon was applied to all of the fields at
your farm and also on several fescue fields located on another Tract.
The application package for your General Permit that you submitted to the Division referenced
the lagoon closure and stated that sludge would be applied to com, cotton, and wheat, on all
fields in Tract # 3633. This closure plan also stated that the closure would take a period of two
(2) years due to the lack of needed acres on Tract 3633.
It is apparent to the Raleigh Regional Office that the closure of this lagoon did not take two
years and that waste was applied to crops and parcels of land not included with the Waste
Utilization Plan within a period of about two weeks. We also have concerns that the closure
plan was written in 1997 and that no current composite sample was taken of the sludge or liquid
waste in the lagoon prior to closure.
The Raleigh Regional Office is considering recommending an enforcement action against you
for the above referenced permit violations. If you have justification that these violations were
caused by situations or circumstances beyond your control, you should include them with your
response. You should respond to this Notice in writing within fourteen days of your receipt. In
the absence of any justification, the Raleigh Regional Office will recommend to the Director
that an enforcement action be taken against your facility.
Please note that violations of your General Permit are violations of NCGS 143-215.1 and are
subject to civil penalties of up to $ 10,000.00 per day , per violation.
If you have any questions regarding this Notice, please call Mr. Buster Towell at (919) 571-
4700.
Sincere(
4ma
enn�etcWuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Mr. Jeff Dillard, Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil & Water Conservation District (Halifax)
DWQ Nondischarge Compliance Group

e

ZV
i T -07r, y fJ c�'�-T�in� 7 /.n�i�a�..
-
---

aste Analysis
Copies To: County Extension Director
USDA-NRCS-Halifax
Hale, Tony
USDA-NRCS-Halifax s f 9
PO Box 8
Halifax, NC 278390008
B Mo Cl
.,. .. ... ... .Z. Ii I.f

LAGOON CLOSURE PLAN
NAME: CRAIG PERRY ILOCATION:S.R. 1003
I5 MIES W. OF SCOTLAND NECK
PHONE:[phone]
COUNTY: HALIFAX TRACT: ,3702)S-y[89
LAT./LONG.:. 36 09 40 /77 29 30
HU NUMBER:03020102070011 DATE;
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Phone Number: 919-946-6481
Plan Prepared By: JOHN CLARK SOIL CONSERVATION TECHNICIAN
Natural Resources Conservation Service
252-583-3481
See attached waste analysis report dated:_12 /_31 /_97_
NOTE: NRCS or SWCD personnel must be onsite while lagoon is
being`closed for them to certify the closure of the storage
facility.
GENERAL INFORMATION: This lagoon was constructed in the late
1970's as the storage facility for a 4000 head feeder to finish
operation. The lagoon is constructed in a high water table soil.
Agitation and pumping are the best means of removing the waste
from the facility.
VOLUME TO HE REMOVED: The storage facility is 600 feet long and
70 feet wide at normal water level. The facility is an average
depth of.10.5 feet from bottom to normal water level. Total
volume of waste (solids and liquids) to be removed is 2,757,696
gallons.
LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE: The owner of this operation would
like to begin closing this storage facility as soon as the cost
share plan is approved. If wheat is out of the field, waste will
be applied to fescue and bermuda grass The waste will be applied
at 0.35 inches per hour if irrigated with a maximum application
rate of 1.00 inches.
SPECIFICATIONS: The storage facility will be agitated with a PTO
driven agitator/pump for a sufficient time to mix the solids and
liquid into a slurry. The lagoon will need to be agitated from
at least four locations. Waste will be applied in a manner not
to exceed the hydraulic loading capacity of the soil and not to
exceed the crop nitrogen requirement as shown below.
InumNl.l.c.f3 I 0 .n .nw..l.r.b-3. d..
SPECIFICATIONS (cont.): Side slopes will be washed down during
pumping. The slurry will be pumped until less than 12 inches of

. 3702
LAGOON CLOSURE PLAN
the slurry remains. All sludge will be removed that is
reasonable and practical based upon a visual inspection by the
certifying technical specialist.
Closure of this operation must be done without a runoff of the
effluent. Do not land apply while it is raining or when the
ground is frozen or saturated. Avoid applying waste prior to a
predicted rainfall.
All areas disturbed during the closure will be vegetated
according to NRCS standards and specifications.
Transfer pipes from swine houses will be removed prior to
certification. If the facility is to be maintained as a fresh
water pond, a pipe for controlling water level and a spillway
must be installed. Otherwise the dike must be breached.
WASTE ANALYSIS: 6.6 LBS PAN/1000 gallons X 2757=18,1965 lbs. N
Field
##
Crop
Realistic
Yields
Nitrogen
Per Acre
Acres
Req.
Application
Rate
(In./Hr.)
Application
Amount
(Inches for
PAN Appl.)
ALL
JFH
14.3
1215
19
10.35
11.0
ALL
I
JBH
13.8
1190
26
10.35
11.0
5789
J,0
1 FH
4.3
1215
46
10.35
11.0
Soil Type(s):GRITNEY,EXUM
NOTE: Because of hydraulic
additional acres rather than
several days back to back.
I
oading, it will be better to use
pumping on the same acreage for
AGREEMENT: I agree to close this lagoon according to the above
plan that meets NRCS standards. I will notify the Division of
Water Quality 24 hours before this closure is started. If cost
share dollars are involved,
Owner:
Date. - 9
6 7 40 16
N
. A/

ra
`5
411
\ ra
•:, � r ram- °�
LA
cr
.01
JI
mA
74
tm
AN
of
,,�V�� IR 1�` ••�'•� C � 'Y r'T• , ti1i'Th �� i' �. � F •fir. , �, N
' T•
sty.- _ 1� V \ ; ,r/�• i
10
�� rt-�-�_�. '� �.19� b •J '� - �vY, o�, fib;.•+•• - '1' *�.
IW
r r .. ,.
s,
';S.fir4 c '

s �3y '�� dal•'.. � ,;{�;' ff :�,i,'r{.- ..f�5�r�.�}'�rS�r I
JAC
Yryl. yrii.� Ltit+'ti° �,F•S. ;'+'j=:i• p'
Y � 11 aj�• S S..t •.��R1 � .y. i��.k��. ` ',i�•uf�7. y.t,; � •y�h - R
�'f it w.Mr 1.'W°�'i �f��L'�: ;ix1/ •. � P`r� j�..
V `t• � S}y�r
ti ef
J•�� 1
`'�`i. a ��•[},y w ° s ii °�{ 3 i 1 1 t r. �' rrj {f8�'• "
'�a.'�M'd: r).�YA�i 1�+!!��+ �F .'.fir, f �� ��� �, °"~�^r'!.i •
�E ° 'tf eye. ,� •.ti s�qy{' � �'�� `i
r
[� `r
4
*• �.(�� 1 E+r,},'1} Y • j,,,J, fi r\ y N..'
° I��Y��}-�'rflyyly'+%•C i+�;y; !{,F �+ir,�,{�r • � � }° •'L' i`, • ' fej L _ 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary NCDENR
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director NORTH CAROL-INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
j
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
L
Craig Perry
Perry Hog Farm
Rt 1 Box 431
Scotland Neck NC 27874
Dear Craig Perry:
DEHNR G1[ IAL 0 tl
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Perry Hog Farm
Facility Number: 42-7
Halifax County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be. received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions. for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%G recycled/]0% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2/98) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established inl5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 seine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
01
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Boa 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50t7c recycled/10% post -consumer paper

1`
December 31, 1997
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
N.C. Dept. of Env. & Nat. Resources
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Dear Mr. Schuster,
We have been working hard with NRCS and FCSWCD to meet the
December 31 deadline for being certified under the .0200
Regulations and the Halifax County Livestock Ordinance. We
have completed everything but the following work on facility
#42-07:
- Old catch basin/lagoon has to be cleaned out and
sludge removed - shaping and reseeding will be
completed as soon as weather permits.
- Irrigation pipe has been delivered and is on the
site. Irrigation has not been installed however, but
will be as soon as weather will permit.
We have completed everything for certification but the above
2 practices and will complete this work just as soon as the
weather permits. We are requesting a special Consent
Agreement'to allow us to finish the necessary work without
penalty.
ZSincrely,
Cr Perr
7
CC: Halifax County Health Dept.
J. Wayne Short, NRCS�
a

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
IDEHNR
Division of Water Quality
September 3, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Craig Perry
Perry Hog Farm
Route 1, Box 431
Scotland Neck, North Carolina 27874
Subject: Notice of Violation
Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Perry Hog Farm Facility # 42-07
Halifax County SR 1003
Dear Mr. Perry:
This letter is to notify you that the Raleigh Regional Office of
the Division of Water Quality is considering making a
recommendation for an enforcement action to the Director of the
Division of Water Quality against the above referenced facility.
The recommendation concerns the violation of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 (a)(1) for making an outlet into the waters of
the State without a permit for such activity.
On August 28, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection at the referenced swine
facility. The inspection revealed an discharge of animal waste from
the primary lagoon via an overflow along the back side of the dike.
The waste was flowing into an unnamed tributary to Deep Creek which
is Class C sw NSW waters within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin.
With this Notice you are hereby instructed to immediately cease
discharging waste into waters of the State and to reply
in writing to the Raleigh Regional Office within 10 days after the
receipt of this Notice stating the measures that you will take to
permanently eliminate the discharges from this facility.
38DD Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609N%` fV C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/ 100% post -consumer paper

r
Mr. Craig Perry
Page 2
Also as a result of the aforementioned inspection, the Raleigh
Regional Office will recommend to the Director that the subject
swine facility lose Deemed Permitted Status which will require the
immediate development of a certified animal waste management plan.
For assistance in the development of this plan you are encouraged
to contact either your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office or any licensed Professional Engineer.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
either Mr. Buster Towell or Ms. Judy Garrett at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation
District ( Halifax )
Mr. Steve Bennett, DSWC--RRO
Mr. John College, Hanor Company
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
kL

September 25, 1996
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Region Supervisor
NC DEHNR
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dear Mr. Schuster,
This letter is in reply to the letter on the Notice of
Violation I.received from your office. At the time Mr.
Towell observed my discharge, I immediately began pumping
from my old lagoon where discharge was occurring into my new
NRCS designed and NC Ag. Cost Share lagoon. I have not let
it happen again and am working with my local NRCS and Soil
and Water Conservation District to permanently correct my
problem and bring my swine waste management operation up to
the County and State required level.
I will be installing pipes to cut off waste from enter-
ing my old lagoon and divert it to my new lagoon.
The NRCS and SWCD have designed my waste management
system and are setting up additional funds for me to convert
all my cropland to grassland (both warm and cool season),
purchase pipe and irrigation line, and land application
equipment.
I am willing to do what is needed to meet all local and
state regulations just as soon as possible.
CC: Halifax County Health Dept.
J. Wayne Short, NRCS
Fishing Creek SWCD
Steve Bennett, DSWC
John College, Hanor Company
DWQ Compliance Group
SinereP
C i Pm
i
DES NR RAI OFFICE

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
XT?3A
IDEHHNFZ
Division of Water Quality
September 3, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Craig Perry
Perry Hog Farm
Route 1, Box 431
Scotland Neck, North Carolina 27874
Subject: Notice of Violation
Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Perry- -Ho g_Farm Facility #4:2`=0
HL alifax County SR 1003
Dear Mr. Perry:
This letter is to notify you that the Raleigh Regional Office of
the Division of Water Quality is considering making a
recommendation for an enforcement action to the Director of the
Division of Water Quality against the above referenced facility.
The recommendation concerns the violation of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 (a)(1) for making an outlet into the waters of
the State without a permit for such activity.
On August 28, 1996, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection at the referenced swine
facility. The inspection revealed a discharge of animal waste from
the primary lagoon via an overflow along the back side of the dike.
The waste was flowing into an unnamed tributary to Deep Creek which
is Class C sw NSW waters within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin.
With this Notice you are hereby instructed to immediately cease
discharging waste into waters of the State and to reply
in writing to the Raleigh Regional Office within 10 days after the
receipt of this Notice stating the measures that you will take to
permanently eliminate the discharges from this facility.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609N%q C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Craig Perry
Page 2
Also as a result of the aforementioned inspection, the Raleigh
Regional Office will recommend to the Director that the subject
swine facility lose Deemed Permitted Status which will require the
immediate development of a certified animal waste management plan.
For assistance in the development of this plan you are encouraged
to contact either your.local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office or any licensed Professional Engineer.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
either Mr. Buster Towell or Ms. Judy Garrett at [phone].
Sincerely,
enneth c u , P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation
District ( Halifax )
Mr. Steve Bennett, DSWC--RRO
Mr. John College, Hanor Company
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, F7WA
Health and Natural Resources A�j
•
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Governor ID E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 8, 1995
Mr. Craig Perry
Route 1, Box 431
Scotland Neck, North Carolina 27874
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Swine Operation
State Road 1003
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Perry:
On July 25, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state. In
addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
were observed. As a result, your facility was found to be in
compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may
also result in the loss, of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Sulte 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

I
Craig Perry
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ju E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
/ds
H:\animdn
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

PAT MCCRORY
F�v
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Anthony Sessoms
Sessoms Farm
713 Cutchin Farm Rd
Tarboro, NC27886-3540
Dear Permittee,
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
July 8, 2016 Director
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Sessoms Farm
Permit Number AWS420007
Halifax County
�f T" 11
� 1 inr
As of this date, our records indicate that the above -referenced permit issued to your facility has
overdue fees. It is both a condition of your permit and required by Rule 15A NCAC 2T .0105(e) (2) to pay
the annual administering and compliance fee within thirty (30) days of being billed by this Division.
The followine invoices are outstandine:
Invoice Number
Due Date
Outstanding Fee $
2015PR005178
7/5/2015
180
Failure to pay the fee accordingly may result in the Division initiating enforcement actions, to
include the assessment of civil penalties. Failure .to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a
recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water Resources who may issue
a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person'
who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under
authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. Therefore,. it is imperative that you submit the appropriate fee as requested
within thirty (30) days of this Notice of Deficiency.
Please remit the payment, made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), in the above amount. Please include Permit Number on your check and mail this
payment to:
Division of Water Resources — Budget Office
Attn: Teresa Revis
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
-contd.-
ON
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Watcr Resources/Water Quality Regional Operations
1636NIO SOLYiec CCUIOI RaIcigh, ti�+u; Cm�Ius 77G?9-1G G
919 807 6464

If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Animal Feeding Operations
Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
Debra 1, Watts, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation, and
Ground Water Protection Branch
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
WQROS Central File (Permit No AWS420007)

r
W
�awiaurc6
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
September 19, 1997
Mr. -Craig Perry
Route 1, Box 431
Scotland Neck, North Carolina 27874
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Craig Perry Swine Farm
Facility # 42-07
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Perry:
On September S, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
operation. This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to
determine compliance with the State's Animal Waste Management
Regulations.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not actively discharging to the surface waters of the
State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed. However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiency was observed:
Your older waste lagoon had approximately 10 inches of freeboard
which is less than the amount required. Animal waste lagoons are
required to maintain enough freeboard so that no discharge of
wastewater will occur to waters of the State during any/rainfall
event less severe than a 25 year\24 hour storm.
The above matter should be addressed to prevent the possibility of
an illegal discharge. Please respond to this Notice within 30 days
of receipt. You should include in your response the actions that
you will take to address these deficiencies.
3800 Barrett Drive, Sulte 101 • Raleigh, NC 27609
Voice (919).571-4700 • FAX [phone]
An Equal Opporturdty AMnnadve Action Emptoyer
SOO* recycled 110% post-carpmner paper

T
Mr. Craig Perry
Page 2
-This office would like to remind you that you are required to
submit an approved _anjxal wast-e--manaagenent p-an by December 31,
1997, or you may choose to submit a closure plan for this facility.
These plans must. be Certified by a Designated Technical Specialist
or a licensed Professional Engineer. For a listing of certified
technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan
you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenne chuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Mr. Jeff Dillard, Halifax County Health Department
Mr. Wayne Short, Fishing Creek Soil and Water
Conservation District (Halifax)
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
NOD\42-07

Facility Number
Farm Status: egistered ❑ Applied for Permit
Cl Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection E]= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: .................................._.................................................. ..........._...._...........................................
Farm Name:.. 1'. 1... ....i'.ibG�'...1 f�1�r.�.................................................. County: .... /_J_V...`.. e .................., .......................
Land Owner Name:.../ C!4..! av1....✓...,1.................................................. Phone No:.. z2..`:........... ;.:...��..�...76 ...............
FacilityConctact:...... !^...<...................1....................... Title:................................................ Phone No:..........................................................
Mailing Address:..... r..r(........ .. .. ..1��� .......`.: Z.. O�Z V 41al j�� ... y . Ll..... .7y. ......................
Onsite Representative: ............ ................... ................................ Integrator: ..��....... �. ! ..... f�, Y S'
Certified Operator: .....
�..�...t'.4-4.�a.✓..I.In I.Iny ........................................................... Operator Certification Number:..
Location of Farm: S2 �v3
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I........... .
.................. ......... ........................................................................................................ ........... ............. -................................................... _ ............................. a
Latitude �•` C�s� Longitude �• �� �«
Gerwral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ;No<
❑ Yes
❑ Yeso
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
es ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Continued on back

r
r`
! � r
Facllit� Number:....... Z—..�7.. ...
6. Is flycili:y not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Difi the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes o
8. Are fnere lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? es ❑ No
S,; tri etares Jl,agoons an Holdi nd.
9. 1s ,�.arage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ErYes ❑ No
:'reeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
-a116
. `L``>rl., 0...If...... ... ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes o
i 1. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures obse ed? kd 1 tt- Yes ❑ No
ruw+G,� jar
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Ofes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? es ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type n ..�.1 .:J..`tiC�........................... .....................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑Yes [:]No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes IsO
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes Rio
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
0-go-
2 1.
For
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representativ'e?
Certified Fa ilitits Only
❑ Yes
�
No
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management PIan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments refer to question #) Explatn apy YES answers'and/or any recommendations or any other comments �-
Use.drawings.of facility toiheter explain situattans: (use additional pages as necessary}kF�t,
br L�a�w, • s fc4zd.IG1 4-o be- a(oSel. v, (y h ra j to
of d—,V d /1494l bkr"U'J .3 ra d as 4 S
�- P4rr� .iS �/DYIG/n� V+-. ir�lg�97�.tI►�. �l�n L...'�H sOj � qn c�%r.�-�o�D�f`irc.�✓
Reviewer/Inspector Name =KE
,z>€
,;, ue y^►
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 64 Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit
4/30/97

I7 /l L_
Type of Visit: a<D Co m ce Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: ORoutine O Complaint O Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency Q Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: l I e J70 t!7 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: �� 0A .t✓ Sc.1S0
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop,
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
I
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
jBeef Brood Cow
Turke s
Qther
Turke Poults
L_LOther
Other
Discharges and Stream lmnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes NoEE] NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No NA :❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 YesJ�0�
NA C:] NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No [DNA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: ! Z= -OQ jDate of Inspection:
'
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes��No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes roo
NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �NoD NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): :& �/'
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes nONA
NA, ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectitNo
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

[Facility Number: 67 Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
No NA ❑ NE
o ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any:additional recommendations or any, other, mm coents ° h (.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pales as necessary). :' ` ��sU �=F s
1
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r3Lf J�/" . �Q �%2�� / Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Jan 29 10 09;38a NRCS & Fishing Creek SWCD
_ . .
[phone] p,1
Fishing Creek Soil and Water Conservation District
Halifax County Agricultural Corner 359 Ferrell Lane Room 151 DI
Post Office Box 8
Halifax MC 27839-0008 William N (Wil) Mahn, Jr.
Phone: [phone] Ext. '3
Fax: [phone] Resource Canservahonist Specialist
Email: will.mann@,nc.nacdnet.net
Fax Transmittal
Date: f ,2
To:
Fax Number:
number of pages including cover sheet

Jan 2910 09,39a NRCS & Fishing Creek SWCD
[phone] p.2
PLAN OF ACTION jPoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES 00/a
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD ,
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
I. Structure Namelldentifier (IDj:
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone)
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
r. s
e. line c x line d x 7.48 g@ ons
12 fe
,?;�, 5 inches
.? q inches
/ • 5 inches
a y 06 a ftz
972g0 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period ,
f. temporary storage period according to structural design [ t0 — days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 1 �?9_9415 ft3
h. actual waste produced curreI herd # x tine g w 122 1y�. 7 fe
yaoo Certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according'to design
k. (lines h + i +0 x 7.48 x 30 days =
9/3b79• i� line f ;to
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated
g7-yo} 15s3.7S G
m. (fines e + k) x line I
1000 115
252.5
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE OAf SITE
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100 1
fe
.JL��-266-7 fe
/55 325. ( gallons
1, 5 lb/1000 gal:
37 $. g Ib PAN

Jan 29 10 09:39a MRCS & Fishing Creek SWCD [phone] p.3
H. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STOREI:i WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. structure ID: line rn = lb PAN
2. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
3. structure ID: line rn = lb PAN
4. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
5. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
6. structure ID: line m = lb PAN
m 11nes1+2+3+4+5+6 IbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT RE APPLIES DURWG THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tact #
p. field #
q. Crop
r. acres
s. remaining
iRR-2 PAN
balance
(lb/acre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE
FOR FIELD
(Ibs.)
calunin r x s
u.
application
window'
/0. LI S
3
�cck e
91.
193
6dms—
3S
fa'
av,8 7
5Q
/tog3.5
I - 3
35
20 .g7
A74
571r, qD
5
?17
XtseA e ku�
�� � , y'
- -7,121
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving
crops during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN mailable for all fields (sum of column t) = 9353 b. PAN
PDA (30 Day) 2l21 100 2

Jan 29 1009:39a MRCS & Fishing Creek SWCD [phone] p.4
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = -77 S, lb. PAN
x. CroWs remaining PAN balance (fine v from section 111) = 93s3. $ lb. PAN
y, Overall PAN balance (w - x) = . ! :597 57, D lb. PAN
r line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new Information. If new fields are to be
Included as an option for lowertng lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
PGA (30 Day) 221100 3

S 03
Type of Visit: i0 Co lance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: iv �X[1� Departure Time: Tom— County: Region:
Farm Name: e—JI-S r- 1✓ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: /3 t-i' 4 h s'-sYOm-5' Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design
Current
Design
Current
Design
Current
Swine
ptt43 n n€
Capacity
Pop.
Wet�Poultry
111minq f
Capacity
1111@
Pop.
Cattle
r i�RIIKr«:
Capacity
1�d
Pop.
I
MINI�N#�':
�pl� , A#i8
A
H lll�l99z
ii�tht=lil499cc
�,�!
�
Vm
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
WS#n to Feeder
Non -Layer
I I
Dairy Calf
eeder to Finish
7
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr Pon
Ca aci
Pop.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other] ,
Turkey Poults
Other
v..raw.wnmi..urnruiew.eu�.�.ror��n.unAus��w�aw*u�
'w.w,nririvawceeerm»..urm�rFrnu.�+r.ww.u.rrne..ururi.
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes N ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes JZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ YesrNoo
NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Page l of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility lNumber: - Date of Inspection: 22—
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes 20,N NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes;No
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes <No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): _
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Z o ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes
❑ NA
ll
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
ElYes
121 No NA
1] NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
0' N ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
ElYes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

�aciiity Number: - d Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNoD
NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes VoO
NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
. and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
/•✓1 � • �'� 55"Q,r-,S GYM-//2 � r h � -- f S— � � �f ZI �< ..
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
C Q
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: .5 Z 2 — f
21412015

(Type of Visit: 0 Com ce Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: - S'* ss o P., 9 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 'in Se-SSph,,,y Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
rine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry . Capacity Pop. Cattle
to Finish La er Dai Cow
ean to Feeder Non -La er Dai Calf
Design Current
Capaciean
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Dairy Heifer
Design C►urrent Dry Cow
Dr, P,oultr, C•.a acit P,o Non -Dairy
Layers Beef Stocker
Non -Layers Beef Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
keys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes VN
❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ElYes❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge tom any part of the operation? [0]YesrNo
NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

(Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
El Yes
pia ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 581 ids lwe
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): f�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
dNo f NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan'?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes ON �❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �ZZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ,E!fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
%
4No❑
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
r
12. Crop Type(s):-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
V
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
Z No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
C2-<o ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
0 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall lnspectio ludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes[] NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit Number: - j212 1 jDate of Ins ection: 5" -Z3rl
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes ,� oo NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ,ENO (] NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. 77T"'
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �NoC]'NA
NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? 0 Yes TTTTTT ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #) ,Explain any YES answers and/or.any additional recommendations or any other, comments:
Use drawings._of facility to better�explam. situations...(use _additional pales as'necessary).- _ . ."., � r �. _�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: `
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 14
Page 3 of 3
Prqq r7
ri! J � ( /
Phone: ? r' `gz-06
Date: S-- 2-3 ` ( %
21412015

5--i 7 --A
(Type of Visit: ,Q Com nee Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: V a !t1 5 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address: �-
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design C►urrent
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pop,
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
t�AIM
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dts P■oultr,
C_a acit
P■o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
on -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
jPullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[] Yes
2f No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
y
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State`? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
A
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge'?
Page 1 of-3 21412015 Continued

Fac ility Ndmber:jDate of inspection: 2�y
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in)
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental th t, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o D NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No -NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No F NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): re2 SGL j'
13. Soil Type(s):
-11
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
Yes
No ❑ NA
�] NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
N�No
[] NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
0N NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the propriate box below.
Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
D NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l " Rainfall Inspecti��Njo
S ge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

lFacility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? EYes ❑ No . [] NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA [] NE
27; Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No A NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes _ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer":to gnestion-,#)i`Explam,'any,,YES.'answers-and/6r any add itional,kecoMmendations or anyother comments s's;>
Use drawings of.facility.to;better.expl,asn;situ,ations;(us e,add�tioaal pales as necessary)•.'. .; ; , •, > :.. , �. :. ;
�,
(V C IC C
4v
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
,r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� (� S �6''L✓�
Page 3 of 3
Phone: '1�j - `f Z00
Date: IN ( rp
21412015

V_
�1
r Type of Visit: Co mOxnce Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ZRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral p Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: v I Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: S Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: 61_ E d2n S<� . 0kl. 9 Integrator:
a
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design
Current
Swine
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poltry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity
Pop.
Wean to Finish
[:[Layer
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
on -Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. 1;ouItr,
Ca aci
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
I
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Tu key Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesrNo
NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes "No
NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environTNo
neat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Z ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
eNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records _& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes WNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Mudge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

� 1
Facility Number: -p Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes"NoNA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers:andlor any additional recommendations or any otber comments.
Use drawings of facility to bettef,explain situations (use additional pages as necessary}
n&-J 4-c) CIO r7&,) 54,c�f Sc,4,rve-y A61-5)
t e-n all,
ReviewerlInspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: 7/I — l-,lZe--©
Date:T_�ti..�
21412014
Page 3 of 3

Type of Visit: �k:) Co ance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emerzency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: / -/�� -1 y� Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
7 Farm Name: /7i� r ,V,? 5 2 _53c> I'l 1' Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
r
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design
Swine Capacity
Wean to Finish
Current
Pop.
Wet Poultry
Layer
I INon-Layer
Design
Capacity
I
I
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. I;oultr.
Design
@a aci
Current
P■o
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Boars
Pullets
Qt
Other
Turke s
urkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other;
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ YesgNo
pNo[o]
,NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili N6mber: G -I I Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Freeboard
Designed (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):L
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
eNo 0 NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
0 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 7<o A ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �An 5 r ra-%a'
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Ej PN
o NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes o❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
:7
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes t�1 1Y ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? [] Yes N NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP []Checklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Judge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Condnued

a
Facility Number: - O Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes;Zo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 7No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes a A ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain -any YES answers and/or any additional: recommendations or any other comm,ents. `
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).'
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: r !/— yZra
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: 0�
21412011

t 2(--0
M
lReason
Type of Visit: AD Cnce Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral Q Emergencv 0 Other 0 Denied Access I
Date of Visit: jC 11 Arrival Time: Departure Time: �] County:
Farm Name: ) ejgjo ,-s' ryt Owner Email:
M+
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
-f�Certified Operator: r t g-yi •J C.�'pI�^+�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design
@urrent
Design
Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet PaurAy
Capacity
Pop.
Cattic Capacity
O.P.P
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
I) , P.oulfr
Ca aci
P.o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes OrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o [3NA [3NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Vacility Number: = Date inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
A
NotNA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No "NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental t at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑Yes
No NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Ai mlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[] Yes
Z
No NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): be //hh -f S
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
EfNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ YesVJ'No,
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�Zo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
❑Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall InspectieNo
udge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

acilit Number: - cl Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments_`
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
V4,4,1 Pet
,
r'-pL I'6Y�'4..,Pr✓ dh,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewerllnspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: / V ` V Z V 0
Date: 2 J 14 I r a
21412011

Type of Visit 10 Co lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Vis' Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: !Lram =IiS r;,,_5 ___ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: !�f- l n`��7h�-� Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: o = = 41 Longitude: ❑ 0 0 i = g,
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capy Popu acitlation C►attle
Design Current
C►►opacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -La er
L,
I ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑
Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Layers
Stocker
El El
El Non-Layers ElBeef Feeder
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys [I Beef Brood Cow
10 Turkey Poults
❑ Other Number of Structures:
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
i t 0
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Imoacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑INE
❑ Yes FNo
A [3NE
ElYes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —21
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes - No NA ❑ NE
ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, -notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No ❑ NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 5KO ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[:]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) J�o r N► tti J'A , f o
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
4-
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes /❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
e $i t�.tt�'��&a
:Comnf6nt '(refer toygtiestian #) Ezplatn anytYES.a werkpndior;any�recomm datio so anydd{other comments.
Use drawings of facility td Metter, explain, situations: (use"add tional'pages as necessarys):
AL
Reviewer/inspector Name , ;� Phone: ']5'�- Y Zay
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 4-"l
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Z.— 0 Date of Inspection��
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections �0'
ather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes��O
NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ YesnN
NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
O NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104

d�11—iS'—r 0
IType of Visit ffl Co ante Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit 2FRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:L Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: r jrI S "+4 Owner Email:
Owner Name: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Region:
Phone No:
Integrator: S
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: Q o 0 0" Longitude: = ° = 1
�esignurrent
esigu Current
Design C►urrent
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Cpacilation
NtIFopu
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ DairyCalf
El Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean 1
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non-Dai
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
Other
❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
❑ Yes �NqNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Z — D
Date of Inspection I :2/ / Tly I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes r1No
o NA ElNE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
I. Is there evidence of incorrect application'? if yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) aC r M r.e%�r' C-z2SGc
13. Soil type(s)
t4. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
[INo ` NA ❑ NE
No NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:l El NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a3i.'t :T 9��3�':�:..
°Comments (refer,to quesho�y#) Explain any YES an wemarid/tortany reco;mm nndattto�ns„or.any„other comments
Use drawmgs)of facility to,better,expEatn situataa&ns (use addtkronal�pagesa££snpiecessargy) ;
a{k`'!:z -
�ifS �t4,�3 � /g�8�'rSil ��j- P4141r615 41 1\ jrLn X
Reviewer/inspector Name ' �. i ra : `. y i rr .. ' ' Phone: % yZBa
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104
Continued
C

Facility Number: — G Date of Inspection [(1
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El maps ❑Other
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the "riate box below. LI Yes LJ No L� NA I_E NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Q N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Lj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No [I NA ❑ NE
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes L9 N ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility P g fail to have an activelycertified operator in charge? ElYes
9No
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
[:]Yes
[--]No
[]NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[__1 NE
Additiona] Comments.andlar Drawings.,; � � ���., �� ���;, �' � � `�� � �. � .��. � � 1
i
Page 3 of 3 12128104

ffl"
Type of Visit -6�mnecce Inspection Operation Review Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Complaint Q Follow up 0 Referral Q Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: y�Q, 'CMS tr?,� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: A'l S 2 on,-5
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Phone No:
f
�
Integrator: 1n l�
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: [::] e = ' ❑" Longitude: = ° ❑' [�] "
❑ Layer 1
10 Dairy Cow
I
❑ Non -Layer I
1E] Dairy Calf
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes NA [I NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes��NoEl NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ONEINA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [I Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Z
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. 1f yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z.3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ZN NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No []NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment;No
e , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? El Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ElNE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ElYes ONo 0 NA D NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there e ' nce of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
xccssive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12.
Crop type(s) EP s(jL / -t c cj—
13.
Soil type(s)
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
� No - NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
l
Ng/❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
El No ❑ NA
❑ NE
u
Usge dra�@wiy ngs oflfactltty to;better(explaiR111 tuatiogns (urge addpigtio alp}a eFs as necessary):;
LSa_ �rr-�sys ,n .Ge Js m n �r q- ir- rr n r fz�,c c-,,n 0-,,
(7 SQ.irQ r�'�i' $-Q vl', iYL per► i S a 5 C4 /G i',�g v,3 / ✓a S t S SS' yS�¢
1W
Reviewer/inspector Name F Phone:2 ZG'i)
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Lc S --}-Li LtI4 Date: 3, 1 C,%
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

4
Facility Number: A70Z — f) Date of Inspection 137z47
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes VNoE1
A El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ YesA ❑ NE
the approprrate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain InspectionZNN[:1
eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [I Yes NA [I NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ffx
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El Yes 7 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
1"IJ G r C/ G; �q �� S L✓ C -�--v
Page 3 of 3 12128104

&/ 57�
Type of Visit O C pHance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for VisO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: L `� Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: -_ Lj rr {9 n s�SSOw^ S Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Latitude: = o = s Longitude: i= ° = 1
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
I 10 Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocket
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: F1,
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
[:1 Yes FNo
El NA ❑ NE
El Yes I --] NA❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 5-1/ :D�Ej
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z Az l/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA El NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre , otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes No ❑ NA El NE
maintenance or improvement`?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) re
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
((�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
NA
oNo
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination 2
❑ Yes
NA
r'
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
1
�1... -$ "men
Comments (refer}to questions#) Explain any YES answers and/or any"recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings�v[°fffacihty to better explain sltuations: (use?additfonal,pages as nee ssary):
'e'sK) « Ai
Gw�fc-/�CC'f-c�St�-p�fv410)a,
bid
Reviewer/Inspector Name A Phone: g
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G Ri(i Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — D Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ;��o
NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check, ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspectio"No
ther Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes
A ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes LJ No NA El NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

=Fadlity
Division of Water Quality Ir° J
umber 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
. 0 Other Agency `
Type of Visit Com nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Z Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: y Arrival Time: i3 ! D Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: I Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: & r ,'`t, sexxo ±—�.j
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = e 0 6 Longitude: = ° = 4
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
�+ ❑Non -La et
Dry Poultry
Non-L.
Pullets
Pou
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Daia Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stockei
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
k.
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge'.?
❑ Yes la �oEl A ❑ NE
❑ Yes � 1Y1 NA El NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El YesFNo
NA ❑ NE
❑ YesNA El
[--]Yes NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: t Z—
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
❑ Yes No NA ElNE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental, threeat otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes jdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �N/o❑ NA Cl NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) a e? r k
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
2'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
No,❑ NA
El NE
No NA
❑ NE
NA
❑ NE
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:?
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

. Facility Number: r — D Date of inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes O
No -NA ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If es check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
p g P Y�
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge`? ❑ YesFNXI-E001
NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
Other lssues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

ry
Division of Water Quahty CIF x
Facility Number Z Q Division of Sail and Water Conservation, 4d`
Other Agency
F
f Visit Co anteInspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
n for Visi Routine O Complaint 0 Fallow up 0 Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: J ///��, p f}J Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:%!'[)
Farm Name: -�+�—"k Owner Email:
�(�S 2 — 5 �31- _S 2_3
Owner Name: i� f , A h leS S'on- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: Jr-e r, S d .
Certified Operator: pvrsj Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
❑ Wean to Fini;
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ e ❑ d ❑ i1 Longitude: = ° ❑ t ❑
Ig
Design Current'` Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle,
❑ La er
❑ Non -Laver
.__. Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts �
❑ Boars i
Other
❑ Other -
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non-DaiEy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures ; a
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �IWO
❑ NA El NE
❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes VNo[]NNA
A�❑NE
Yes A ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: e1Z - D7 Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 7Neo NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:�-
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): c
Observed Freeboard (in): / I ! <<
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? S L Lr` S ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes No ❑ NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes�No[_-_]
NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) ! s, jr& R
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? Cl Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes No NA [INE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #). Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain'situations. (use additional pages as necessary)::„
h c�. �.,, re ►.,a�-t S,►, g ll
SQL Jqr� C' 11 8-LT011 A5
Sa e"'Q-� h'1+.�f 't5r i�rtA f �1 -CC C T�rah-�i �
l�r.s
Reviewer/Inspector Name �- ---
- —_. - — - - - -- - - Phone:
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
Gr Date:
Page 2 of 3 12178104 Continued

Facility Number: L�/Z — Date of Inspectionf--"-`_ ,
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes O<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need impro ent? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o Z-A
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? es ❑ No❑ NE
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Now❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
El Yes
,�
Id'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No 0NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
(F.tt � q
1 i+�1, °1 . . S jy p �+.. s d-s J �L U✓ C �- i� r2,� pe C- 2 l l% 5- l yi S ry p ke s l e j
a
C n h 1= t •,.i �s �, P n 4P.Q S 1' 12 v>~ ce „ f. , n F-+ i c _e
re i)ttf,4- L, ov IL C s�l e,4,F-c, oil ce— pe-- f
A�>'Gn� tJ re L0-ve. ,
Page 3 of 3 12128104

IType of Visit Q'Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit oRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of visit: Time:
Facility Number Z
Not O erational Q Below Threshold n
,ZfPennitted Certified E3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operate or Above Threshold: ..a10.�.T�..
FarmName: ....... � � !:................................................................ County:...... �c.flNr�........................................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
MailingAddress:....... 2.0.....6y.e.w.'r.........--P..�..�...C(f................. �...............ay....... .....,�.....................
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Certified Operator: ........C4. l.'......... r �Br'...................................................
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: .............................................................•.....................
Operator Certification Number: ...... 2. "Y.............
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 44 Longitude • 4 64
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier• 71................................`'t
..................... .................................... ................................... ................................... .......
Freeboard (inches):
12112103
❑ Yes 2"To
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �(No
❑ Yes
ffNo
❑ Yes
P(No
❑ Yes
O NNo
❑ Yes
94
Structure 6
Continued

&'acility Number: Y= Date of Inspection �f
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type G r P! 17�M
❑ Yes )ON1 0
❑ Yes 21'No
❑ Yes 2<o
❑ Yes Pilo
r
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �o
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? .,Ys ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 0No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 0<0
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes eN0
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes P40
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes 2J/No
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
�.'t a2s aSS f co d"I am Aii4/ Y ,6y
316.3lqlof
A4U1 , - 4�
--
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;4
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
1-k ;*,- /�'
Date:

acility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ W 4nt
plication ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ S i1 ampling
_ • 0� 1�7•(�o tt 24. Is facilitym comp iI ance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑Yes
❑ Yes /)d No
❑ Yes �'"No
❑ Yes J lv u
❑ Yes ❑.No
❑ Yes l" 0
❑ Yes J`J "
❑ Yes N �No/
El Yes �1Vo
Yes ❑ No
❑Yes ❑No
es )21�0
es �o
)21'
Yes o
❑ Yes ❑ No
!o No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. I
u5f+wy am0 JfM(L,i+�s atGl, ?� ,�a /� / _• I
o J6 � co,` `� s & . J � , Xj, MHO
n
P
y �-
12112103

•�SiF���4Tk`a ��`� Y � d.:�p,Y+�xnC k-�-�EN`�( sly, V.; LIY 4liUIlVJ-�1Vil'i1PU 1'Y aIC[ \.Vn]CCYitl�Vila++ A'4NIrw 1 :ti-+p��ti �`.t ^�'e-{ ,�,'.a sl �r ?.•�ti : .F
;i�o S: �„ •`".-.'" N- p h.e "S:".-'N1."r''s�ir F�- t't: t'e��,.:';h'Sp�t1t,E: t y`F<� r ,� - eS Ns': {A�' r;' r� "s.'tl'•.E !
y q 2l�x N)
.•r�i ,iJr i
:tu�!�"d ^"'{ Y��yr �� � E't'�° 'E` r�'�'^F vme",R''M��7??K`��N � �,F^, �t'a �����y . � � .. � 3 a �i4i 4 r r'1 4 � zE i • �s ����t�•rr e..�� a �.. � • �.
Type of Visit 2;Routine
m liance Inspection O Operation Review 'O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facilih• Number
Date of Visit: 1 iz D5 Time. io•` rz.
of O erational Below Threshold
ermitted Certified (j © Conditionalh' Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operat dove Threshold-
Farm4�iq '' "'-
Farm Name: FX " County: ITC,
Owner Name:
Mailing Address -
Phone No:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: �j
Certified Operator: Operator Certification number: I A— 2Z&
Location of Farm:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Norse Latitude 0 ° Dµ Longitude ' e 16
Design Current
Swine Canarity Pnnulatinn
❑ W n to Feeder
eeder to Finish
QQO
El Farrow, to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Po ulation
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Laver I ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons �� r ' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area "10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps JEJ No Liquid Waste Mana emi:nt System
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lazoo❑ ❑ Sprav Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Ef No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [I Yes PTXo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 2jrNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ��No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? El Yes
Waste Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 6 ] No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: V 6 _�e L
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: .L — Date of Inspection /' f
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Was!LA lication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes Oo
❑ Yes �Ia
,,❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes O'No
❑ Yes PIP0
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
12. Crop type s , 4?"-*Lq sA Lnu,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA1%k'MP)?
❑ Yes
.+� "'0
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
12 N
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
;�No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design. maps, etc.) 1771v3
/r
❑ Yes
t'4 L
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation. freeboard, wa ttc 3 &soireports)
jsalle
❑Yes
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
;?No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0,50
22, Fail to notif., regional DN Q of emergency situations as required by General Permit'.
�
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
❑ Yes
S`-"'0
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
j No
24. Does facility require a follow --up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
PI<O
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
,8 No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about t1iis visit.
ipnny k fi3"U F
Comments'(re fert'og'*u'iisdv;i `. _ 'E.'. a� a�MtYES vF
Use raciletyto better e=platn situatwans:{use addi�vaal pages as necessary) t a'La ❑Field Copy
M
❑Final Notes
lt? tc)L&�
--f;'L� 13 . c `4o � 4 Ni s S�
J
tlt.l . h c�x.ci Care X l t !7j N h r AV c &k,(AA� 0"M4 +
1e�,�
:m,
Reviewer/Ins ector Name "1 i t: '� =a ' P -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
/
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspi,clion
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
0 Yes No
❑ Yes No
4110
0 Yes �dNo
El Yes )ZNO
El Yes N
El Yes V. V�
El Yes �lVo
"Additional Comments an d/or,:13rawings::-�YY
OC "4-4
yw
rce�.
05103101

L
Type of Visit d3rCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint. Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Z Date of Visit: Z t 4 Time:
O Not Operational_ Q Below Threshold
A31permitted SKertified Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operateo olr&b\ove Threshold:
.1°�� q2N{.. Count .....`.`.�:: ........................
Farm Name: Y....... .�................................................. Ys
Owner Name:..... ...........� L..
... ........................................................................
Phone No:.—. Ll b ........................:.
FacilityContact:.....�..c...................�—..................................Tiit�le:...............T............................................. Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address. ....Sy. dc.) .... By_4 tM.6....xvi � .......[p1 ............................... . 5 .67 t!J! Sl... l cl....�.. .� ......... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ............................................................. Integrator:.��+..�1.ri? 15..... 9�..
.i.. ... t - P l....,. :............
Certified(?perator:...............R...................... ....L........� ' .............�............... Operator Certification Number:... ��'. ...............
Location of Farm:
5(2- 1003 I s 0. sco v N�c � •
Mi6wine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �' �' �" Longitude
!` Design " Current^'
tine,...: .......' ...- . Capacity �.Popula}ronr _.:Poultry .. .
❑ W an to Feeder
seder to Finish
000
�0
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
i ,Current • �' � Design : r Cure
Po ulation : Cattie ,Ca aci iPo 'ili
❑ Dairy
Nuwber'�of Subsurface Drains Present J1❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
Halduiig Ponds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts /
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑,FAO
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon [I Spray Field El Other
a• If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes sr No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes EfNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes �o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:...........................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

)FacilityiNumber: — Date of Inspection Z !Z a 1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
�o any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type _3e r (scu, E - AuJ D ¢ C
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
ReAuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) .
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Q yiQl�ti�njs:ot• d0fiejeA9iE1$ WOO 0004. daring this. 00 fatthk
eorres 4idence: about: this visit.
iN.i�� ��.;...IEis�_!',tli
Jse drawings of facility torbe"t expk situations` (use additional pages as necessary) ;
r
� 7) �'clJJ 2SP-T -'5e oLs d M2c� � � Cl _t�c.K�,ou�� � l S Z-1
AYes gfl o
❑ Yes �No
'Eryes ❑ No
❑ Yes eallo
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes P110
❑ Yes AfNo
❑ Yes 111mo
❑ Yes Pfgo
❑ Yes -P-f4o
❑ Yes O
❑ Yes />140
❑ Yes PrNo
❑ Yes !-90
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Flo
)'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes JPNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ,'No
"r C- iN c� G GL2ui AM",
O'k A �Dai�+e. �s•'�=
Sb1a� � .SIB
f I l 718171/
f9
1 7/2, 17/2-1 "154 ,'c¢ OTC 5k kv k 0_0(L - 6L* �V
� 3 i Tr �, �" M J 3 '�• , ..' "Y
Revieweriqnspector Name i: t lA)/iJ =�1 1�i €i sF<..@.1€.t 1 s! .,i,.3�:i, h1 �`. $3 ,a,i€ .3� XIMN.
Reviewer/InspectorSignature- f --I __ __ - Date: 1L {LAl __ slop

-I )Facility Number: �Z — Date of Inspection !L J a
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes XNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on'neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ONO
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? []Yes ,�No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ONO
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �TO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes o
Additional Comments an vi orF rangs
0 -Te- vieCl . 7i &U v s
��rzz as 1�� 32-'
t ([ sfAdy AC
LU lu '�a� PR,
��
�s _�

' �;, , , �, � ��s:�'t!D�Div�sion,ofi5oilandWater;Conservation, OpeiragonRevtevv���E, ;�a�"'��;�-�i i��
w � 55 ; � E ,>' �0`rD�of So�I and Water�Conservottott ` Comphanceinspechon� a� El���d ����, `
i :A'. R "Y:: e': ,.'tE V.�if-,3 a `I--'. �¢: dof .. ,.3..E,.... i.i dt iv. t33 oF! _is,
r ' �vtston of Water ual� Com Nance Ins echon E E
JC)4outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-rr utt� of DSWC review Q Other
Fa 'lity N Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection n!d 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 13 Certified [] Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10 Not Opera—t—io—na-11 Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: l�e Y 1� r�p 1---Asz Agl,.I�►4.�......................................................
nn..3................................................................................ ...............
Owner Name:.............C.� �..� d�er✓� . .......................... Phone No:................
Facility Contact: �.................. .........'Title ............................................ Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress:............................................................................................................................................................................................................ ..........................
Onsite Representative: C�...`. �r �. .... Integrator: ...C.'g.��/L�....................................................
Certified Operator: ............. ...... ....... Operator Certification Number:,.........................................
location of Farm: 5.lz � OD3
Latitude �' �' ��' Longitude �• �' �"
'I)e(stgn a -C'urre
gDe y� ` t
Swine Caactt :;PCattle , acl °:Po ulationoutatibn PoultrY Caacity Poulatnon 5C
❑ an -to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish ❑Non Layer ❑ Non Dairy
❑ Farrow to WeanJ.
t r
❑ Farrow to Feeder [] Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capactt'y ,
. ❑Gilts ., � �x._�,- , . E �i�, r.
❑ Boars Tofa1�SSLW,
4. Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
E
Holdtng Ponds / Sold.Traps, ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ElSpray Field ElOther
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/tnin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �fo/
El Yes o
❑ Yes id"�o
❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure fi
Identilier:
Freeboard (inches): ...........l.�............ .............. ....................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
/-� seepage, etc.)
''Z3/99 Continued on back

.. y
Facility Number: 7�� Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
la. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding
12. Crop type e a,r f c, sh�N r r
POWWOW
❑ Yes . a " o
❑ Yes -.2' Its
❑ Yes ;"�O_
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ PAN ❑ Yes �"o
13. Do the receiving crops diff r with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?,
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility re ire a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
P, yWk, iot'is o% &hc' iendes oere note¢• dtrrieig this'visit' • ;Y:oit wiiI-tOe K,6 tio: futtW • . - . -
icorre'snondence. albaut. this visit ::::....::::::::::: :
❑ Yes ENo
❑ Yes � o
❑ Yes �❑i'No
❑ Yes td�O
❑ Yes Ito
❑ Yes ISO
❑ Yes '0' il� O
❑ Yes IdIV0
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes IGf �O
❑ Yes Jd o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ YesF�/
ElYes
, s (r „ lq „ ) P y, y` _ mendations ot`a'ny`Other Comments." a ` f omments re er o. ues on x atn an answers an or an recom it
Use drawmgs,of facility tp.better explain situations: use addifional pages'aslneCFessa
s,I , ., .,..:. ..,
Ak
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Qti
. f
Date: -7
3123/99

Facility Number: -Q Date (if Inspection
Odor issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
0
28,
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
`vu
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted'? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
o
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged till pipe or a permanent temporary cover'?
❑Yes
o
Additional Comments an or rawinp: :', td N! ......
3/23/99

i
❑ D' ton of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
Q Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-2of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-u of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 1
'YAmity Number o Time of Inspection 0 U 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered [3 Certified G Applied for Permit [3 Permitted © Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: CJ' .[ lrl �w�h.�-I=� - ...................... County:...:...........i.�..�............................................
. ..... ........ .......................
Owner Name:...../I........ ............................ PhoneZ...'....................../ ............. ................ Facility Contact: &Q. C.d.a,,,.,pr„✓•,y rr „ Title: I . Phone No: ..........
Mailing Address '% r 6 L� T i2 S '!...°!...".C.t! C /YC. .t 7�7
......................►..................................:..........�..�t..........�..................................................�"........
Onsite Rti resentative.... ..o.......L� s .......�........................................
'p �'..P!ia.:.�.................................................. InteKrator:.. G�}-,rr�l�tS
Certified Operator;,,.... ���� ! �.''' ........................................................................... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
[.ovation of Farm;
Latitude Longitude �• ��
Design '- ,Current
Ilesign Current r u' Design '`Cucr�nt
Swine, ,'_ y
`Capt city Popuiar<on
Poultry � �
Ca pacity:_Population�� , Cattle , Capacity Ropalafion
❑ to Feeder
:1 Layer
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
ElNon-Layer I JC] Non Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
;.
� " `.P 4 cz N''.
❑ Farrow to Feeder
-� ❑ Otherk
❑ Farrow to Finish
"
Design CapaCttyW"
❑ Gilts
3
❑Soars
F' .Y.�� �S � T atal L
z
Ntunbe ffLagold�ng Pondsk SubsurfaceLagoon ❑ Spray Feld Area
7 A e
❑ No
Li uid Waste Manains gement nt System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
(1, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N0
❑ Yes 5No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
ElYes o
❑ Yes No
f► )

.
Facility Number Z —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? 6C- CPS- o.. a-44'f Yes ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons,Iioldine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes U<O
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: C�..�.41/ ... � tr't. IVV n................ ..............................................................
Freeboard(tt): A/Y.// 1 ' `................................................... s....................... 3....Q.............................................................................. ,_ �,
10. [s seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes �PO
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?'
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type j..#r h:.....: gy......�:.. c S.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? n
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only,
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 � No.violations•or de%ciencies were noted during tlik Visit'. Y.ou,will receive• 66-ftirther• :
corresppode 6� si oiit this:visit, : ..:: :. .:.......... :. V .. :.
❑ Yes No
_�
❑ Yes E;a
......................................
❑ Yes Q<O
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ]o ,
❑ Yes Io
❑ Yes
El Yes �No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
FAC'; i-4y i✓v4 7e,4- cz -4i r;./ AWA, 4fn� A.*( a4tc C oor-� oy yr
i r,/;j#400- SyxAh, 7 G. j t oiJ- 41-o4- iS -'9c.4eW,�/ed/ 6e
inlz G.4,1 PC"Kr7 1,, C D C . h OW M' V � � %JP.�-�7 Gv� /� �iG lI. -7 �.
0
q (9 — ? 3 3— o n 16 6 r V 33' fe ?3 Ls )c a 5_-�/ 4V CAlgtiJ�C,
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r Af,9- - _ Cam,. fC Date:

�r
Division of Soil and Water Conse'rvatlon -`O eration
alp
[rDivisiyn of Soil and aWater Conservabon1'-ll
CompEiance IInspectaont,
, 11 ii: k 1'-.. %.
®.��
vision of Water Quality Compliance Inspection j, E
I
0 OtherAgency enc 0 eratlon" R e xF 3 r
eV1eW , �, r tl ;
IERautine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Mate of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection
24 hr. (hh:mm}
C3 Permitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ..1.r.1`. .L9
PPilr ... .� .....rr+;f?�n- ....................... County: .! ....L...`..1.....:T......................... .......................
Owner Name: ✓
.....�9....��
�r� Phone No:
................... .... .... ........... Z. Z-.z6.........�7-...
............................................ ..... "............ .... ........
Facility Contact: C.�.fg,./-J...l... J'r '...................................................
........................... Title:............................,.......... Phone Na:
MailingAddress:,,.• S
� 47
i
Onsite Representative.... .'.�4..�5'... pe-?'r ! Into rotor r (w...............................................
.......................................... r...v..
CertifiedOperator:........................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: <' 0- 1 em _
..
Latitude rr� C�' ' Longitude • ��^T" ""'" _
Design
Current . Design' 'Current Design Current
Swine, :, : • Capacity
Population' PouEtrY . Ca Tacit ` I'a 'ulaton Cattle ` Capacity Population.
❑ W o Feeder
;: ❑ Layer " ❑Dairy
eeder to Finish
Non -Layer ' ❑'Non -Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other ,
❑ Farrow to Finish
„F' �1i 1���"� it ,'
` I ; I€'', 9 E ' ,11 Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
F t!, itl lil !IJ' '€{ I,ii- tl ;
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
ji,Nu.Lagoons Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Are:, Spray Field Area !
!; mber,of❑
'' ®•
,4 E
.Holden' . ; �. , ,
iy j+onds / Solid Traps
! • ,
C�: '' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
4
Dischart±es & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes C;, o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes :�Noo�
❑ Yes [-I o
El Yes �'1VU
El Yes
❑ Yes n 1VQ
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier;
Freeboard (inches): ........... 1`i•'•1..... ................ ............ I...........
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes o
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99. Continued on back

Facility�Number: Z— Date of Inspection
6' Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type j- Q
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rewired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage,& General Permit readily available?
w
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc,)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
.. Rio yi. . io is'ok. dteciend*e ' .mere hoted- 00ing �bis'visit' • Y:oitt ;will reb iye iio further
comes. and i ' e. abatit. this .visit.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes M-Po
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes L�'iVo
❑ Yes o
Yes ❑ No
;ff'Y,e ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes,. No
�_Kes ❑ No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes o
Comments (refeir to'queshon #} Explain any. YES answers and/or aay�recominendations or any3otherEcommenis�tj E 1
(use
Usetdrawtngs of facElrty to`t ettei explai&srtuattons additional pages'as necessary}
%;j a E� r, Y t ni .; aLl - <r 3 E,o t .I% :l „ -,
_� ...�
el�.
A.
51 JyLV-A 3 repn 1 �'e ��i r-,'d1 J5 ,
fi r l`'�47 �ip�• &9 v�
csti.FaS�t l�,a� 37, 190165 W pA,~
t=gal 3q Zt 5• Gv�5
l� j 14 p p t,'a d. w a 1 c w 0 ez"4,
tiv-
'� _ 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name {' t E ` , ' ., •' '.�.'�,! ' � .� �� ;;-
n
_ �,�.�,� � L_.LT�F"�l f� "` ` ���• � � � I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 7d'h.1 6, 1
Date: / ZK
3/23/99

1 facility Number: Date of Inspection Zr/
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below es ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 011�0�
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon`?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent temporary cover?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
El Yes a
El Yes c
❑ Yes No
3/23/99

e vM ,� �'r'4 *,y, 3- i- l..-,,:.,:-:#o- A �. ...::-i».a»�uw .i.. .,,. �: :-'..:aiiY?,',:: • .�::: a.s x,. �,...r. ':,: n... ..: �e;.p �.� 4. ..u.,•,.v .., to �...
9 ❑
llS WC Animal Feedlot Operation Review��
rt i
rt❑DWQ Anima! Feedlot Operation Site Inspection} Y `
t
E k;
^a: a 3 t ,:�•
O Routine O Complaint O Folfow-up of DWO inspection O Folio -iv -up of DS%VC review O Other
Facility Number
Farm Status: ® Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Dane of Inspection
Time of Inspection j 124 hr..(hh:mm)
Total Time fin fractitin rot' hours
(ex:I 24 for I fir 15 min)) Spent on Review , S
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
113 Not O eratiol!nJJial Fa.f'/ Date Last Operated: ...................................................................r............................................................................
PFarm Name:.......... .{. ........................................................ County' ......... Aa.114,UaX........................ .......................
C� !r s
Owner Name:........{.a. �l? f.r Phone No: ..........:::. .{ ......... i .. ..............................
ilit� � t i t: �.I �,at �..><'.t.. .........I...,..... Title:.... 1'1�.� Phone o: I~ac c.�rz : x.. !................................ N...................................................
Mailing address:.... �.1.... 1��....7...�I......................... ................... ............. I ........
.....
Onsite Representative: .....Ly.a.i.s...... r.Lb:Y.................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:...........L!................................. .... Operator Certification Number: ..... �!...r� ..
Location of Farm:
I&
............................................................................................;...........................................................................................................................................................................
.R..........5...t.�s.......►............5�+1.a.,.....,1�....................................
Latitude • ®' " Longitude ©• ' ;t & "
Number of Lagoons / olding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains
HPresent ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
en yral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [i V i 2 3 f ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? w �— _. :, ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Mow in gal/nun?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
r �.. ❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ N
❑R'No
❑ Yes
WN
❑ Yes
LNNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: --
6. Is facility riot in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Oo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? VYes
s No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? I>d Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
....................................... .......... I ........................... ................................................................................................................................ .............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ;;No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? GeYes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify D "'Q)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes /No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 0 No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................KNN'o
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes LIB No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yps ® No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? B Y/Y s ❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? I Yes ❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ZNo
For Certified Facilities -Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
g� 0la OL5 OR Itcl O` C_lcsQvt. IN I i/i. �I� IGScGn Ci�CSn� ice.•' C y�', `CE
At4-Z► A o CJ tv-, b a�-. Q r� c.. c f "fc- e) (G c o n s —fie C a l C a •+ =`.'. ,- Co. •c>L; , V.
��{a� Gnd Per
r� i�i L
to
Neks IG;,5ot -1
1I,r1.7U4°pw
},Gc..�Cc^CjcSs0,C
Gr.� jrt,�,=
?C.
tr.s �g11CA
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Eacility Assessment Unit 41.5U/9

a
Site Requires Immediate Attention
Facillry Number:_
SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7 7 , 1995
Owner: f' Farm Name:
County: , ��� � dL_
Agent Visiting Site: r` ' �c� -_ Phone: t,-B3 ,? 481
Operator: Phone: A"'
On Site Representative: ..0 .o> �.. All _ Phone: J'2c— 23 5� ?_
Physical Address: L5. /00 1/2 fP nor
,5 c'o-4ct 4't'ti hl Q-
Mailing Address:
Type of Operation: Swine ✓
Design Capacity: !4 6 Q 6��
Latitude: -7 7 - o_'
Type of inspection: Ground
Poultry _ Cattle
Number of Animals on Site:
Longitude• t Cp 0 l ' --eS
Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or Actual Freeboard: Feet Inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' freeboard under the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o No as there erosion of the dam?. es r No
's°8dequ:�te land available for land application? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
.. K+soe�+�
Additional Comments: Qktol,-?o•- dal- ��r. -- Z/� ��
Fax to (9I9) 7I5-3559
Signadh4 of Agent
e

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,F15WA
! Health and Natural Resources •
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., ,Secretary ID E
Jonathan B. Howes, Secrets
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 8, 1995
Mr. Craig Perry
Route 1, Box 431
Scotland Neck, North Carolina 27874
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Swine Operation
State Road 1003
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Perry:
On July 25, 1995, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state. In
addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
were observed. As a result, your facility was found to be in
compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
_management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Craig Perry
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ju E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
Ids
H:\animdn
cc: Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

jul-14_1995 15:26 FROM DEP1 WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
PRO P.02/02
Site Requires tmmediate At[enljorN,
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN'T
R- ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: -7 ` 2 , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:
County: 15hpul; r
,•
130k y
SGJ � Lqn d �7ec./L A/ L 2 7? 7 V
Tntegrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: S'2l o 0 3
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle-
Design Capacity: _ V-f'9Q Number of Animals on Site: 2G a
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM.Cerdficarion Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 (0 ' j 0 Longitude: ' �' a 9 " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes, or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event.
(approxirnately 1 Foot + 7 inches Y;e or No Actual Freeboard: _ mac. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any =lion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crops) being utilized: r+)s'J_ 4''n - _ _�...,. �._
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings? i or No
100 Feet from Wells? a or No
,ne animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
saimal waste land. applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feat of a USGS Map 131ue Line? Yes or
's :animal waste discharged into waters -of the, state by inan-made ditch, flushing system. or other
iirnilarY man-made de'vices? Yes ot& If ices. Please Explain.
L
-s thc facility maintain adequate waste ma iagernCi,t .records (volumes of ruanure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover cm ):' Yes or'N0
Additional Comments: r
/,o* s e, -, 40�
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Crr��
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.
1

r
DI[Y11V1.h1 - wu rdx•y1j-(jD-0 40 Jul LV �� 11• J7
Site Requires 1r=CQ1u►rn«� C:u9;a c
Facility Numbcr-
S ITE VISITATION UCORD
DATE: Z�12z__, 1995
Owner: =`�---- Farm Name:
County:
Agent Visiting Site:���r� Phone:
Operator: '. / t Phone: = `{
On Site Representative:Phone: '` 2G— - z
Physical Address: ----------------
Mailing Address: /
Type of Operation: _ Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: f� O Number of Animals on Site: v a
Latituda: 70 Z9 Longitude: la a ! _ _? "
Type of Inspection: Ground Aerial
Circle Yes or No
Lk)eg the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot * 7 inches) Yes or 4ga-D Actual Freeboard: . Feet - Inches
For facilities with more than orle lagoon. please address the other lagoons' freeboard under the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the laguan(s)? Yes a No a.5 there erosion. of the dam?. es r No
'`�s adequ:�te land avail -able for land application'? Yes or No Is the cover crap adequate? Yes ar No
Fax to [phone]
Signatt� of Agent

Facility Number: -
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: - S
Time: Z7n t)
General Information: !
Farm Name: r w 14 County:_?
Owner Name: Gv L Phone No: —�
One Site Representative: C✓R i P),.- 4 Integrator. n/i7 12
Mailing Address: Pam-_ I x �(
Physical Address/Location S5z / 0 3
Latitude: I I Longitude: I 1
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Catfie No. of Animals
❑Sow ❑Layer oDairy
Mursery ❑Non -Layer OBeef
CPeeder 5,0 1)
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: 3 (include in the Drawings and observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility inspection: 2— a r d� ay,- J
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hoes storm storage?: Yes 8'No ❑�
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ No el
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑
Is any discharge observed? Yes E� No ❑
❑ Man-made Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facilityneed re acreage for spraying?: Yes 0
more g
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes No ❑
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: 8r (13 Acreage:
.C_

Setback Criteria /
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?: Yes ❑ No a -
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?: Yes ❑ No L�
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue tine Stream?: Yes ❑ No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet /
of Blue Line Stream?-.. Yes ❑ No 9�
Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement?: Yes PJ N ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?: Yes
Does record keeping need improvement?: Yes No ❑
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management
Plan on site?- Yes [ -KO ❑
Explain any Yes answers: ►- o l�/pi✓ _ ` Z p 1 n �0 S r ,p -
Signature:_-6��A r au--e� Date: �' ��� 9.t/,
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Drawings or observations:
A01-January 17, 1996
Use Attachments if Needed

State of North Carolina
Department of. Environments •
and Natural Resources �1999
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary"-,NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Kerr T. Stevens, Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
July 19, 1999
Perry Hog Farm
890 Bynum's Bridge Rd.
Scotland Neck NC 27874
Attn: Craig Perry
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS420007
Perry Hog Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Halifax County
Dear Craig Perry:
In accordance with your application received on March 15, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Craig Perry, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG 100000. This
approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of
animal waste from the Perry Hog Farm, located in Halifax County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than 4000 Feeder to Finish and the application to • land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS420007
Perry Hog Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Dianne Thomas at [phone] ext. 364.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Halifax County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

ANn1AL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
Facility ID Number: .-Y Z - o j County:
OPERATOR iN CHARGE
Home Mailing Address,=
CityaQ -\
Certificate # _ Social Security #
Work Phone o� Eflrne Phone SL—�Q-_
Signature Date � - &4 --qc)
I
Maili.n;. Address
State r Zip' Telephone#, 5_ � _� ,C
Signature Date 517
Please Mail to:
WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535

4
E
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 21, 2006
Anthony B. and Kendra r:Ssssoms
Sessoms Farm
713 Cutchin Farm Ro
Tarboro, NC 27886�
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA242007
Sessoms Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
' 04` Storage and Application System
Halifax County
Dear Anthony B. and Kendra H. Sessoms:
In accordance with your Notification of Change of Ownership received on April 17, 2006, we are hereby
forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Anthony B. and Kendra H. Sessoms,
authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application
system in accordance with NPDES General Permit NCA200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Sessoms Farm, located in Halifax County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than an annual average of 4000 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to
Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unnecessary, they may
be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4
gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007 and shall hereby void Certificate
of Coverage No. NCA242007 dated April 9, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required
to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit,
the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required
monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste
production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this
COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be
completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please 4 careful attention to the record kee in
and mo.nitorina conditions in this permit. The.. Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be
completed and returned to the Division of Water Qua] it,Lyo later than March 1st of each year.
N�am�`nCarolina
Nalva!!y
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwateroualitv.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmalive Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a %100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a,spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General -Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
fo rAlanlimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
,Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Halifax County Health Department
Halifax County.Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files
AFO Files

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITV
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Anthony Sessoms
Sessoms Farm
713 Cutchin Farm Rd
Tarboro, NC27886-3540
Dear P ermittee,
PAT MCCRORY
Governar
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
z
n Director ti..
September 21, 2016 M
z'"�
C:1
:7
o'
�s
Subject: Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent to Enforce ;
Sessoms Farm
Permit Number: AWS420007
Halifax County
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have an animal waste management system
permit pursuant to NCGS 143-215.1 and Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, you have been found to be
in violation of your permit. It is both a condition of your permit and required by Rule 15A NCAC 2T
.0105(e) (2) to pay the annual administering and compliance fee within thirty (30) days of being billed by
the Division of Water Resources (Division). The Division sent you a Notice of Deficiency by a letter dated
July 8, 2016. As of this date, our records indicate that the above -referenced permit issued to your facility
has overdue fees.
The followina invoices are outstanding:
Invoice Number
Due Date
Outstanding Fee $
2015PR005178
7/5/2015
180
Be advised that this office is considering recommending assessment of civil penalties to the
Director of the Division of Water Resources if you fail to pay the appropriate fee as requested within thirty
(30) days of this Notice of Violation. The Division has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more
than $25,000 per day per violation against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the
terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. Therefore, it is
imperative that you submit the appropriate fee as requested within thirty (30) days of this Notice of
Violation.
Please remit the payment, made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), in the above amount. Please include Permit Number on your check and mail this
payment to:
Division of Water Resources — Budget Office
Attn: Teresa Revis
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
-contd.-
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resourcev Water Quality Regional Operations
1636 Mail service Center j Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919 907 6464

Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statue or permitting
requirements. If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact the Animal Feeding
Operations Program staff at [phone] or [phone].
Sincerely,
0,0,,3 1 Q:VA
Debra J. Watts, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operations, and
Ground Water Protection Branch
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
WQROS Central File (Permit No. AWS420007)

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization 7-
11-1.4-2005 J' l APR
This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been develop�dlby�vr{
Brian Sessoms Swine Farm Scott Kiser
Brian Sessoms
713 Cutchin Farm Rd
Tarboro, NC 27886
252-531-5923
FCSWCD
P. O. Box 8
Halifax, 'JVC 27839
252-583-3481 .
Developer Signature
Type of Pla> : Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
ature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard prac ices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
r
Plan Approved By:
echnica! Snecia st Signature Date
715478 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-14-2005 Cover Page I
RECEIVED t DENR I�DWeD
Aquifer .
MAR .3 0 2009

s
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 3,708,000 gals/year by a 4,000
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
8540
Incorporated
14667
Injected
16152
Irrigated
9283
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1 11
9,283
9354
-71
3,736,289
-28,289
................... -me-- -U --- me- -•-ans --u"se-r-de---...-ed ---s-ource, --- -----•-------------------------------------------...-..--------
Note: In source ID, 5 ans standard source, fin
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
715478 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: I 1-14-2005 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
arc also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres •
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
5489
32
13.98
10.45
N/A
Exum
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
5489
1 34
5,60
4,22
1 NIA
IGritney
Fescue Hay
3.4 Tons
5489
35
28.40
20.87
NIA
Ex.,
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 "Pons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
5484 1
37
2.10
1.60
NIA
Gritney
Fescue Hay
3.3 Tans
PLAN TOTALS: 50•08 37.14
b }V` 1.) R 7t5��'� i Ri "'•°; i'P+n +: r..,
�Ais,te�'i���OfE'TlitQ�Z,BIIG
NrL 1�' 3� '• '' rl' `°'e'N:E k�t14,.'�., ti7en ors �rI +ri 4 �'+"�✓ F y7 rrv,J
.x
92nutrient
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (500) should he planned.
>= 2 &
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391)•
715478 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed I1/]4/2005
PCS Page Page I of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number- of acres of cropland needed to usc-
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic_
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert_
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Matiiue
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Irquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
hgtud
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal1A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5489
32
S7
Hxum
13.98
10.45
Fescue Hay
4.0 Tons
9/1-7131
169
0
0
Irrig.
169
67.51
0.00
705.43
0.00
5489
34
S7
Gritney
5.60
4.22
Fescue Hay
3.4 Tons
8/1-7/31
143
0
0
Irrig,
143
57A2
0.00
241.05
0.00
5489
35
S7
Exum
28.40
20.87
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0.00
416.82
0,00
5489
35
S7
Exum
28.40
20.$7
Hybrid Bermudagmss Hay
6-5 Tons
311-9/30
274
0
0
Irrig.
274
109,45
0.00
2,284.16
0,00
5489
37
57
Crritney
2.10
L60
Fescue Hay
3.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
l39
0
0
brig.
139
55.52
0.00
88-84
0.00
Total Applied, 1000gallons
3,736.29
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
3,708.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
-28.29
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, to
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
715478 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 1/14/2005 WUT Page Page I of 1

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in ntnoff, This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater, It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
5489
32
Exum
0.35
1.0
5489
34
Gritney
0.40
1.0
5489
35
Exum
0.35
1.0
5489
37
Gritney
0.40
1.0
715478 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 11/14/2005 IAF Page Page 1 of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crap production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application, Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water'moving to streams and takes,
phosphorous is a concern, Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
' Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Curti 120 bu
150
13.16
50.15
100.29
150.44
1-lay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
25.07
50.15
75.22
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
47.01
94.02
141,03'
----•--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ....................... ...---
715478 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-14-2005 Sludge Page Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
122
1
2
119
1
3
143
1
4
165
1
5
156
1
6
148
1
7
146
1
8
144
1
9
166
1
10
145
1
11
136
1
12
129
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each inontlt.
------------ ............. I -------------- --•-------------- --- -------......------••----------------------------------.----
715478 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-14-2005 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
I. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application; or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
I
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, themitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding'less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than IO tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office. Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when. there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- -----
715478 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 ll]4/2005 Specification Pap-e 1

S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
1.1. Any new swine facility sited on or after October .1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than .200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
rigbt-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste maybe applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ------ -
715478 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/14/2005 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direst human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
--- ----------------------------- -----------•----...----------------------------------------------...--..---._._............
715478 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/14/2005 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 35
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain„hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimaI). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row, Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60.bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. - Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 35
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
----------------------------------- -... --•.... --------------------------•----------•---------------------------------------------------------------.....
715478 Database Version 3.1 Datc Printed; 11-14-2005 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 32
Fescue: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained
Adaptation: Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept. 1 to Oct. 15 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0,25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Tall fescue requires adequate soil moisture for persistence and production. Soil test
for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac
nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume
inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates
by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in
each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages
in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 34, 37
Fescue: Coastal 'Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Moderate to Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept. 1 to Oct. 15 (best) and Feb. 1S to'Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 201b/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds 'or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Tall fescue will tolerate soil wetness but not flooding or prolonged saturation; use
ladino clover for mixtures on these soils. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and
potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply
N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N fates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------------
715478 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-14-2005 CropNote Page Page 2 of 2

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 12, 1998
Craig Perry
Perry Hog Farm
Route 1 Box 431
Scotland Neck NC 27874
SUBJECT: Designation of a Certified Operator in Charge
Perry Hog Farm
Facility # 42-7
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Perry:
North Carolina General Statute 90 A-47.2 requires the owner of each animal waste
management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid
animal waste management system, to designate a properly certified operator as the
Operator in Charge (OIC). Our records indicate that the OIC you previously
designated is no longer a certified animal waste management system operator.
As the owner of a registered animal operation with an animal waste management
system, you must designate a certified animal waste management system operator as
the Operator in Charge. Enclosed is an Operator in Charge Designation Form
specifically for your facility. Please return this completed form to this office by
June 12, 1998. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as
absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for
your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge.
If you have any questions regarding the certification of an operator, or need assistance
in locating a certified operator in your area, please contact
Cindy Dudley with the Technical Assistance and Certification Unit at
[phone] ext. 309.
Sincerely,
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance & Certification JJait---
cd/Desig. of certified OIC
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATORS CERTIFICATION COMMISSION
P.O.BOII 29535, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0536
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POET -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 28, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL,
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Perry Hog Farm
890 Bynum's Bridge Rd.
Scotland Neck NC 27874
Attn: Craig Perry
IT W.
4002
. - . - M!w �Ll
NCDENR
NORTH CAROL.INA DEPARTMENT OF'
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS420007
Additional Information Request
Perry Hog Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Halifax County
Dear Craig Perry:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by June 27, 1999:
Inspection reports indicate that there are two lagoons and one holding pond at this facility. I have the
volume documentation for the new lagoon. Please provide capacity documentation for the holding pond
and older lagoon if you intend to continue using them, If you will not be using one or both please provide
the following:
- a copy of the lagoon closure report,
- a note in the narrative section of your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) that states that you
intend to close this lagoon in accordance with NRCS standards, or
- an amendment to your WUP that states that you intend to manage the older lagoon along with
calculations that show the estimated nitrogen concentration (how it affects the nitrogen
balance at the facility), plans for irrigating from this lagoon, rainfall amounts, etc.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter
must be submitted on or before June 27, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with
15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364.
�-" REGlC,11�L OFF4C�
cc: Raleigh-Regional'Offce;ll at r---a-it -
Permit'File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely,
vlrk"4 s
Dianne Thomas
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycledl 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Perry Hog Farm
890 Bynum's Bridge Rd.
Scotland Neck NC 27874
Attn: Craig Perry
Dear Craig Perry:
16Tk?W,J
IT 0
/ •
2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEA�fiTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANn`NATURAL ESOURCES
April 8, 1999
1
Subject: Application No. AVS42000z?) \
Additional lnformation.Request
Perry Hog Farm `C"
Animal Waste Operation
Halifax County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by May 8, 1999:
Inspection reports indicate that there are two lagoons and one holding pond at this facility. I have the
volume documentation for the new lagoon. Please provide capacity documentation for the holding pond
and older lagoon if you intend to continue using them. If you will not be using one or both please provide
the following:
- a copy of the lagoon closure report,
- a note in the narrative section of your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) that states that you
intend to close this lagoon in accordance with NRCS standards, or
- an amendment to your WUP that states that you intend to manage the older lagoon along with
calculations that show the estimated nitrogen concentration (how it affects the nitrogen
balance at the facility), plans for irrigating from this lagoon, rainfall amounts, etc.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter
must be submitted on or before May 8, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with
15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364.
Sincerely,
Dianne Thomas
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh.Regional.Dffice, Water-Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

T
Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number `/Z- Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: i Q 4 acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: Cr A,!� j�T_ Part Il eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: c9i�C,
Date of site visit: �2-V r
Date of most recent WUP:
Annual farm PAN deficit: ` 19 6y• I4/ pounds
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part II, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D.lD3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an 1 or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part IIl.'(NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part II. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application -of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of -irrigation -records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches failure to.deduct .required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage: identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5-acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

!: I %
Revised January 22, 1999
Facility Number Z
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'.'
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
' l
5i
z z
3 Z
f3 4l
Z o
1 Jr
► r
S
/�
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant_ null zone or onint numbers may he used in nlace of field numbers
depending nn r.A1NMP
-_._..__, r_...,-_ _, _. `_. .. _. _ -...-1 __ _ '. _ _ _ _. ._..__._ __'_.._...-_..,. .-
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years` (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

Sr p .z 4 1997
CRAIG PERRRY FARM' �''°.a
Irrigation Design for 4,000 Head Feeder to Finish Swine Operation--'
DWQ Facility ID No. 42-7
Halifax County, NC
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Wilmington Regional Office
-in conjunction with -
Dr. Ronald E. Sneed, Ph.D., P.E., CID
3405 Malibu Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6505
-and-
US Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Halifax District Office

IRRICIATION DESIGN
TABLE OF C'OL NTENIS
1) Irrigation System Design Narritive & Certification Forms (10 pages)
2) Irrigation Design Tables (4 pages)
3) Supporting Calculations (10 pages)
4) Pipe & Sprinkler Charts (3 pages)
5) Components Of An Animal Waste Management Plan (5 pages)
5) Stationary Sprinkler Field Calibration Procedures (22 pages)

FA
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
DESIGN NARRITIVE
& CERTIFICATION FORMS

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Division of Soil & Water Conservation Wayne McDevitt
Governor Secretary
September 19, 1997
CRAIG PERRY FARM
DWQ Registration No. 42-7
Scotland Neck, North Carolina
IMGATION SYSTEM DESIGN
The Craig Perry swine farm is located on SR 1003 in Halifax County near Scotland Neck, NC. An irrigation
system for land application of swine waste is required for the for the facility to be certified under 15A NCAC
.0200 Division of Water Quality regulations. This document presents detailed calculations and specifications
for the proper irrigation system to be installed given soil and crop parameters, geometry of the fields to be
utilized, and financial constraints.
A solid set (permanent) irrigation system is recommended for this farm.. All sprinklers will be single nozzle
full circle preferably Senninger Model 7025RD-1-1"M #18(9/32") @ 55 psi and sprinkler height of 1.5' off
the ground. The sprinkler radius is approximately 70 ft. with each sprinkler spaced at 84 ft. x 84 ft. Spacing
is 60% of diameter which provides a good coefficient of uniformity.
Four fields have been made available for irrigation. (The-animals-will_pioduce_a .tflfal-o€-9,200 lbs of --Plant
Available Nitrogen_(PAN) per-year-(2:3.1bs.of.PAN/head/year x 300 head = b90=lbsof PA_N/year)? Coastal
Bermuda is planned to be sown into Exum soil and Fescue in Gritney and Exum. The Realistic Yield
Expectations (R.Y.E.) for coastal Bermuda on Exum is 6.5 tons/ac, the RYE for Fescue on Exum is 4.3
tons/ac., and the RYE for Fescue on Gritney is 3.8 tons/ac. See the attached calculations for how much
nitrogen each field can uptake per acre.
Approximately 32.89 acres is required for proper waste application. Therefore, 203 full circle sprinklers
spaced at 84 feet by 84 feet with a radius of 70 feet will provide an effective irrigated area of approximately
33 acres. Per the attached construction plan there appears to be sufficient land available for proper waste
application at this site.
The four fields proposed for irrigation are under one ownership. Therefore, the irrigation system has been
laid out without respect to field boundaries in fields-35-and-35a-and-also-in-fields_32-and-34:�No property
buffers are used. Per John Clark of the NRCS-Halifax County field office, Mr. Perry will obtain a notarized
agreement with her property owner on the South side of his property which allows him to spray up to the
property line and wave the 50' buffer.
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 O Telephone [phone] O Fax [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Craig Perry Farm Project Name: Perry
Halifax Coun - _September 19, 1997•
Please note that the current waste utilization plan has field 32a sown in Fescue. This design
will be invalid if all of fields 35 and 35a are not sown in coastal Bermuda. Fields 32 and 34
may remain in Fescue.
The maximum friction loss in the supply and lateral lines should not exceed 10 psi. A 4-inch lateral
servicing between 12 and 15 sprinklers, a 3-inch lateral servicing between 5 and 11 sprinklers, and a
2-inch lateral servicing between 1 and 4 sprinklers will produce a maximum friction loss (in the
longest lateral less than 7.90 psi. A 6-inch supply line will produce friction loss of 2.68 psi. Inlet
pressure to the first sprinkler on each lateral should be maintained at 59 psi. All lines (supply and
laterals) will be connected using bell and gasket joints. A 4-inch brass or plastic gate or globe valve
will control the flow to each lateral. (see construction plan).
The pump and electric motor should be a 20 HP three phase with a capacity of 256.5 gpm at 177.0
feet of Total Dynamic Head (TDH) with a pump efficiency of at least 70.25% and a Net Positive
Suction Head Required (NPSHR) less than 12 feet. A Berkley Model B2 '/2 ZPL with a 7 11/16-
inch impeller diameter is recommended. Impeller may be trimmed slightly based on manufacturer's
recommendations. This is available (and is recommended) in a cast iron pump, closed coupled with
a nominal 3600 rpm motor. Safety controls include a manual disconnect switch, magnetic starter
with properly sized heaters (no more than 1.5 amp above rated operating current).
4n the discharge side of the pump, both a gate valve and a check valve need to be installed. The
check valve will prevent flow back through the pump when the system is shut down. The gate
valve will be used to control the pump discharge. Also on the discharge side of the pump an air
relief/vacuum relief valve, and a pressure relief valve should be installed. See construction plan for
placement of additional 2 or 3 inch air relief/vacuum release valves. These valves can be aluminum
or cast iron, but they should be rated at a minimum of 150 psi working pressure. These valves will
be supported by a metal angle iron or wooden post. Some kind of priming device will need to be
installed on the suction side of the pump. The suction pipe should be at least 6-inch in diameter.
Some kind of strainer needs to be installed on the end of the suction pipe. A foot valve can be an
optional item. While it works, it reduces the priming requirements.
There should be thrust blocks placed at all bend, tee, and valve locations. From MRCS 430 DD,
thrust blocks for dead ends and tees are 0.7 that for 90 degree elbows. There is not a calculation
for a ground entry or Z pipe. It probably should be 25 to 33 percent more than that required for a
90 degree elbow. See calculations for thrust block sizing.
All risers shall be equipped with a Webstermatic V quick coupler. The exact type of riser
connections to the laterals shall be determined by the installer based on the best interest of the
farmer (ie. connection which will allow the farmer the best access for maintenance and repair of the
riser connections). Quick couple will need to be protected by use of a rubber cover. Recommend
using two or three elbow connection for lateral protection. All fitting, connections, valves, tees,
etc. shall be class 200 or Sch. 80.
2 of 10

I . •
Craig Perry Farm Project Name: Perry
Halifax County September 19, 1997
System Operation
This system is a 14-zone system. Each zone has 14 to 15 sprinklers. One zone is operated at a time
by opening a valve and then starting the pump. The maximum run time for each zone should be
approximately 128.55 minutes. Approximately 4.78 inches of irrigation at 0.5-inch applications
with an average of 20.5 hours of irrigation per zone per year for zones 1-9 is ideal. For zones 10-12
3.16 inches of irrigation at 0.5 inch applications with an average of 13.6 hours of irrigation per
zone per year is ideal. And finally for zones 14 and 15, 2.79 inches of irrigation at 0.5-inch
applications with an average of 12.0 hours of irrigation per zone per year is preferred. For all 14
zones the system will require approximately 248.9 hours of pumping per year. The precipitation
rate for this design is
96.3 x 17.1 gpm / (84' x 84') = 0.233 in/hr
While an hour meter or flow meter is not required on the pump, it is important that good records be
kept of the number of hours of operation. Rainfall events may increase or decrease the total amount
of wastewater that has to be pumped. On the average a total of approximately 249 hours of
pumping will be required each year.
During the winter months when temperatures are below freezing the risers need to be drained at
least into the lateral lines. Water should not freeze at the buried depth of 24 inches which is the
recommended depth for Iaterals and supply lines. The pump, suction pipe and ground entry pipe
need to be drained or protected from freezing using heat tape or some other type of heat. Sprinklers
and air relief/vacuum release valves should be checked periodically to ensure that they are operating
properly. Check to ensure that the pressure gauge at the pump is operating properly. The pressure
gauge should be glycerin filled to ensure that the wastewater does not damage it.
It is not necessary that the pump, motor and control panel be placed in a shelter, but it is
recommended that a smaII building be constructed to house the equipment.
Rec6rd Keeping & System Operation Evaluation
Accurate records should be maintained on all land application of wastewater. The two forms IRR-
I and IRR-2 which are contained in the Certification Training for Operators of Animal Waste
Management Systems Manual which operators received when they attended the operator
certification training are excellent for this use. This allows the operator to record when the system
was operated, the length of time and the amount of effluent applied. These records need to be
maintained for five years. This includes pumping records and also lagoon level records. Senate Bill
1217 also requires that the soil be sampled annuaIIy within 60 days of land application. It is
suggested that the lagoon be sampled quarterly.
The irrigation system should be operated in daylight hours, and in conditions where wind speeds
are less than 10 mph. Each time the system is operated, the operator should check for leaks,
3of10

4
Craig Perry Farm Project Name: Perry
Halifax County September 19,1997
malfunctioning sprinklers or pump or any other things that might affect system uniformity. The
system should not be operated during freezing weather. With this system there should be a
minimum of maintenance. The electric motor and pump require little maintenance except for
draining the pump during freezing weather and checking the sprinkler for nozzle wear or proper
rotation. If the pump has a packing seal it may need to be adjusted so that leakage is not excessive.
The leakage should be piped back to the lagoon.
There should be a pressure gauge at the pump and one Iocated on the sprinklers in the field. This
will allow the operator to ensure that there is adequate pressure on the sprinklers in the field.
There is also a requirement that and Emergency Action Plan (EAP) be prepared for the farm.
Details of the EAP are given in Chapter 5, of the Certification Training for Operators of animal
Waste Management Systems Manual. This plan deals with lagoon overflow, runoff from waste
application fields, leakage from the waste distribution system and leakage from the base or side
walls of the lagoon. All of the items in the EAP are common sense things to do if there is a
problem. All farm workers need to be familiar with the plan and how to respond if an emergency
occurs.
Each farm will receive two inspections per year, one compliance inspection from the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ), and one operational inspection from the NC Division of Soil and Water
Conservation (DSWC). Both inspections will use the same forms. Items that are not in compliance
with the Waste Management Plan can be cited as violations. It is important that the Waste
Management Plan be implemented and followed.
The system should be evaluated annually using the procedures developed by specialist at North
Carolina State University. The evaluation brochures are available through the local North Carolina
Cooperative Extension Service Office.
If there are any questions or comments regarding the design of this irrigation system please contact
Brian Gannon, Division of Soil & Water Conservation -Wilmington Regional Office (910) 395-
3900.
Uld
p22536 _
o a
U
J G
4of10

CX V + c k CoUp ip. 1 y c �� �•-,'
r----------------------

i
W.
YW

Craig Perry Farm Project Name: Perry
Halifax County _ _ September 19, 1997
Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
Existing or New or Expanded (please circle one)Existing
General Information:
Name of Farm: Craig Perry Farm Facility No: 42-7
Owner(s) Name: Craig Perry Phone No: (919) 8264766
Mailing Address Route 1 Box 431 Scotland Neck North Carolina 27874
Farm Location: County Farm is Located in: Halifax
Latitude and Longitude 36 09 12 / 77 30 00
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific, road names, directions,
mileposts, etc.): SR 1003 5 miles west of Scotland Neck.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. ofAnlmals
_ Wean to Feeder
x Feeder to Finish 4,000
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
—Farrow
to Finish
Type of Poultry No. ofAnlmals
Layer
Pullets
Type of Cattle
Dairy_
Beef
No. ofAnlmals
Other type of Livestock- Number ofAnlmals
Expanding Operation Only
Previous Design Capacity: Additional Design Capacity
Total Design Capacity:
Acreage Available for Application: 61.98 Required Acreage: 33
Number of Lagoons/Storage Ponds: 1 Total Capacity: 540,000 Cubic Feet (U)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and
will implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment
and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will
be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation Service. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water conservation district prior to
implementation A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification ( if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
{1} '
5of10

Craig Perry Farm Project Name: Perry
Halifax County September 19, 1997
Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to
15A NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm turned above has an
animal waste management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specification of the Division of
Environmental Management (DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 211.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRSC) and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to
15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F.0001-.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as
applicable. while each category designates a technical specialist who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP,
RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically competent.
ILL Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please print):
Affiliation:
Address: (Agency):
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site_(WYTP}
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop
is suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please print):
Affiliation:
Address: (Agency):
Signature: Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility with exterior lots [RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please print):
Affiliation:
Address: (Agency):
Signature: Date:
(2)
D) Application and Handling Equipment .
6of10

Craig Perry Farm Project Name: Perry
Halifax County September 19, 1997
Check the appropriate box
Existing or expanding facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP ar 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate -the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained an calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
X ,New. expanded, or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for sprayirri,gation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
New. expanded. or existing facility without existing waste anotication equipment for land soreadine not usin
Wray irrigation. (WUP or I) ',It+urrrr,�
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to ap'i� ,Sary to
accommodate the waste management plan (proposed application equipment can cgJeit the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading r*s;� a qy't�,ming of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration aii�' lus� guf<la ce am
contained as part of the plan). _ 0 2 2_5,- C ��p ?
Name of Technical Specialiselease print): Brian J. Gannon P. E.
Affiliation: North Carolina De artment of Environment Health & Natural Resour " ter
Address: (Agency) 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 Phone'k(o.� i0
Signature: Date: 7/30/9 "'fy
E) Odor Control, Insect Control, Mortality Management and Emergency Action Plan (SKI , WUP, RC,
OLD
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control insects have been selected and included in the waste managementplan. both
the Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by the
facility.
Name of Technical Specialist(Ptease print):
Affiliation:
Address: (Agency): _
Signature: Date:
F) Written Notice of New or Exnandine Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin
construction after June 21,1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or
last expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact be certified mail all adjoining property owners and all
property owners who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding
swine fame. The notice was in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. a copy of the notice and a
list of the property owners notified is attached.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please print):
Affiliation:
Address: (Agency):
Signature: Date:
(3)
7of10

Craig Perry Farm Project Name: Perry
Halifax CountySeRtember 19, 1997
III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection Stora a Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofus, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist:(Please prints
Affiliation:
Address: (Agency) Phone No.: _
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site (Wilp}
Check the appropriate box
w The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
—Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping
system as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to
establish the vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the
proposed cover crop is approprate for compliance with the waste utilization plan.
Also check this box if appropriate
If the cropping system as specified in the plan cannot be established on newly cleared land within
30 days of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion
control.
Name of Technical Specialisi(Please print):
Affiliation:
Address: (Agency):
Signature: Date:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M.B above has been
checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan,
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please print):
Affiliation:
Address: (Agency):
Signature:
(4)
Date:
8of10

Craig Perry Farm Project Name: Perry
Halifax County _ September 19,1997
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RR-0 i
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from loungiand heavy use areas have been installed as
specified in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots no certification is necessary
Name of Technical Specialist(Please print):
Affiliation:
Address: (Agency):
Signature:
Date:
D) Application and Handing Equipment installation (WUP or n
Check the appropriate box
_ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use, calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
_Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment
guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Conditional Approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day)yes); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance
with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to
the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please print):
Affiliation:
Address: (Agency):
Signature: Date:
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in IILD above has been
checked.
I (we) certify that'I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as specified in
my (our) waste a management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation from a Technical
Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification I (we) realize that failure to
submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from
DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD, SI, WUP, RC or 1)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operation.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please print):
Affiliation:
Address: (Agency):
Signature; Date:
(5)
9of10

Craig Perry Farm Project Name: Perry
Halifax County Se tember 19 1997
Please return the above completed forms (pages 5-9) to the Division of Water Quality at the
following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section Compliance Group
P.O. Boa 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-05035
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
10of10

���� "kRj'- r.� jam, •i�,� '• I , n,;' �•,,.:1 ��=-� I ,, - •�.7"f:
f� its •,. �.• ,.+13,� ._� Y i♦ - 'ti
' ; �, iS t 1 •+ '.J �,�' x1 Yhy, � lI�C'. � a_ "�I � L�� � ,. i r I h
mA
s. � �,�•Ir •!ku F, .mil ' ! IPP' r'e ! '=�yy 'i!s}}fir ., i. +� � ii ,7• I�'�llt 'hS��' � ,11�.
i• s'i'+i'kk { rs J•.' .7,\fWti l� 1i fir, yn1r Fs
} Sy a
• ..;. F,, I E ,, -3 <1%14 15: ♦ ,i � t. t f. ,��'1.r�� --
.r10. 11
� f J..- I r i� .y'•"� .V�ef11� r �'�,l ." .t' ., .�.r' , 1 � r' + ,, f ,,',�,•
,� I \ } .. I 1 I • i� + �r! ,4 -ll ! �..p 1 ., •, �y �i � fs: yS���I,wu 4i
` �� �' �' ('• + 11'� � , s. 1"4 i�� �I �i,'e•', �� V�^:�•!I / i- -'= I 7't',{r'�', ++�'7•fj r -u .
_ '; , - I::. �, ! i � .t.� f � [�"� INCi+� , 'l { si'! d'' : ,.'rti �R,1:1F ', nr• It
, .F 1 J � Vd n �: �� � r .�.• F � _ f 4 3 n i lil yi`lk.�'�i'ri �' I � � tl3 �1 1 fi', -a '� {�.} t'rf 4•7� f t. .
.. �.. '\I 1 • r-•��`i' �1:� `�.+t f ?S�'� S !,^M(�75R k� , 4i01 Ilk,�I A't�
+ r.4 .il t. f J ,' L ♦ �,' �. ,I'ij. 1 rrJ, r� 1�,'I�/ hY t��, 14�
. J ! ' l l t�'� i f 14" � , j+-w F' '�. �,�1_��• �.t ._ �.'* �•;�„� ��-� F •f���� �� :O tr. �J'� �,. T. l t^� 'r •
�• 1 \�, II h '� i J!, ._t.+f,� I� �F♦w 4Kr-1, ai} .iN r J
sy)ii +q
�7�C'�' Pw ram` ti //// t /'�t�kxJ 'F! ,1• "t.�t'�
W q I r,�.�_ v ri �' / 1CgC' ti I/ S7 ire l •lr �r
t.. I��
v.TIC) ,';•4tjji P. art, 11 t�3> I rl{7 ' ailj ww i
. i!r
111 41 tI ?� v Rl � 1� .': [•! 11CL
`'f(�� .. � , � SG\ ti• 5�1- , , _s I
'/ V 1 b y y u
tic- i j9 x d �f
4i0,
'-"i+'trL' �,I ,t�` tii*r `+177:. t�\ 1! , , }1_<.k i/�� ? I y�{ '( r�w )�♦Y''�t, �I 1 l7
� r� t �.�. a i ! `v n-_``r' J. ' �,= r} rs•L l��, �• �, ,. \ qtr
} "�,14 �L �, l 1,1 � .[ F r'T'!� lei li 'ri v= r • r t• it `{ �'r '
I { j Ci y i �S �� 1,, ✓�• EN
� ���� • i - �� U1 Q' t� j. •� /• T•�-: 1,•. �`..'"I"a', t. _ - �'„r 1�4� {S;' 1;,1+ 1
i .: ♦� I f, . ! � .� :,r!l.��j++�' . N• .t �17�' ��,♦+t , :�f r l I i : �- r � s % �h',1' �� � ^ � � I f
! •�,, ... :� ,.�, ' ' ':� � �� 1 � F ��/7-y�t�J�A•.~Cl. f� ,t~i`: y I �� S s'�"1 �7,'; i•} r ' f �li••
i °" ���'•�.. � � {• F• �;'..._ � ,++ 1'ia �1 l a�5��i �•Yy � e, � Ll 7 � '.� � , 7- aJ �i L `�L ' r'''����.'tir
' �.++ �' " D II � " � - a;. \~ ; I.•^.k 7 C ' Y. .i C ': a' l�,� r-'11'1:.:, :;i�
I _w,I •j�'�'�}).+ vsy'• v af{1;�'Y>i ...'� I rU'.`��.,t 1�v I 1 7• f'� 5
`.1 ti •F" �S 1f. .... t �! `L'Nl� 1�".! j,�:•11' IC CI r i f ' ` t+iir4 I
�_ ��r ;t 1 :�,�.. •� r.'[ 1yk1`.I''`�, I[ I ,r '� � {-;�! '� It �' 1'
r ��, t t71 ,1 0. ' k� ,.! 4 ►`. "' ' stir � A is n .f+ ',r+ lti 1, � / /�= CL -�
' � - �;�,,�+�t _, �\•.',\,r,.'� �,f-f�,,r.a::Li'}; ' .I, '•1 t,ll.ti� 1•:�'�..'E'.}.��'t•!�^S�-.,� i .
y�iI.Y4�'F •,ry7,n_ M Wit- .Tr• rr ` L��•'�t:• �. ; .
a4 'ia.s r'��, � �i •f7 J!,f, � �:; �' ..,ec"� /1 ..� .. •�njl.!1 7�,
if 'PAW'.
..J. �l N' •.:! � „ ! • .' A1� � - •ii l JY♦-!: !`� / I emu'' � i /
�' 7:.� t;�� � x t' ' •fit �.;: "=��� ` ,-.�: - . ,� , .,.,. � •' 3 � -
�•' Wtv.. .-.�''' � +1�\(.'l�n ! t�" l•��j fir" �•� --I,la .�:� �r.:. �` ,� \ � ,� !' Imo' ,v �
'11Ic�. .. •6�� t .kr -�i. `� ,:-1.1 C}i.'f I :.vi�t}a..I� ./' :r1 •7•.
CL
i ! - -- •• - '' r 1..y�' try,+' A 1.i,1•
Jr.
.��` 1•� }��. uZ�r.i � r ` �� � 1 l.•r"` J � I ,!.';�' .,�}

z
IRRIGATION DESIGN
TABLES

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Craig Perry - DWQ ID No. 42-7 County: Halifax County _
Address: Route 1 Box 431 Scotland Neck, North Carorina 27874 Date: 9/10/97
Telephone: [phone]
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
Field
No.
Approximate
Maximum
Usable Size
of Field
acres
Soil Type
Slope
%
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate
Inthr
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle
inches
Comments
35
28.4
Exum
2-6
Coastal Bermuda
0.35
0.50
35a
14
Exum
2-6
Coastal Bermuda
0.35
0.50
32
13,98
Exum
2-6
Fescue
0.35
0.50
34
5.6
Gritne
2-6
Fescue
0.35
0.50

•
Table 3 -_Solid Set irrigation Gun Settings
Craig Perry - DWQ ID No. 42-7
Route 1 Box 431 Scotland Neck, North Carolina 27874
Halifax County
[phone]
Make, Model, & T of Equipment: Sennin er 7025RD-1-1" M Nozzle Diameter 9/32 jrNo. 1B
Field No. Wetted Hydrant Spacing (Ft.) Application Nozzle
.a Number of Diameter Along Between Rate Diameter
Line No. I Hydrants (feet) I Pipeline Pipelines (Inrhrl I (in)
Operating Operating
Pressure Time
0 Gun (nsi) 0- Hydrant (I
35r35a-i 14 1 140 84 84 1 0.2334 9/32 55 2.14 Between 9-10 applications needed AYr..
35a5a-2 14 140 84 84 0.2334 M2 55 2.14 Between 9-10 applications needed 35/35a-3 14 140 84 84 0.2334 9/32 55 2.14 Between 9-10 applications needed pe
35/35a-4
14
140
84
84
0.2334
W2
55
2.14
Between 9-10 applications needed per Yr.
35J35a-5
15
140
84
84
0.2334
9/32
55
2.14
Between 9-10 applications needed er Yr.
35l35a-6
15
140
84
84
0.2334
9132
55
2.14
Between 9-10 applications needed l Yr.
35-7
15
140
84
84
0.2334
9/32
55
2.14
Between 9-10 applications needed perYr.
35-8
14
140
84
84
0,2334
9/32
55
2.14
Between 9-10 applications needed per Yr.
35-9
14
1 140 .
84
84
0.2334
9132
55
2.14
Between 9-10 apelications needed per Yr.
32-10
14
140
84
84
0-2334
9/32
55
2.14
Between 6-7 applications needed per Yr.
32-11
15
140
84
84
0.2334
9132
55
2.14
Between cr7 applications needed per Yr.
32-12
15
140
84
84
0.2334
9/32
55
2.14
Between &-7 applications needed per Yr.
32/34.13
15
140
84
84
0.2334
9/32
55
2.14
Between 5-6 applications needed p2r Yr.
34-14
15
140 1
84
84
0.2334
9/32
55
2.14
Between 5-6 applications needed per Yr.

Table 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Craig Perry - DWO ID No. 42-7
Route 1 Box 431 Scotland Neck. North Carolina 27874
Halifax County
[phone]
Flowrate of Sprinkler (gpm)
17.1
Operating Pressure @ Pump (psi)
76.66
Design Precipitation Rate(inlhr)
0.2334
Hose Length (feet)
)000000000000000oa
Type of 3poed Compensation
X000000000000000oa
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric, etc.)
Electric
Pump Power Requirements (hp)
20
hp - Q-TDH13960-eff
Table 5 Thrust Block Specifications
Oesioner may provide thrust block details an another sheet
Location
6" Pipe
Thrust Block Area
Sq. FL
4" Pipe
Thrust Block Area
Sq. Ft.)
3" Pipe
Thrust Block Area
Sq. Ft.)
2" Pipe
Thrust Block Area
(Sq. Ft
Comments
90 degree bend
Dead End
Tee
Ground Entry or Z pipe
4.71
2.10
1.18
0.52
3.30
1.47
0.83
0.37
3.30
1.47
0.83
0.37
6.27
2.79
1.57
0.70
A - ((98-H-D--2)!B)sln af2

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name: Brian J. Gannon, P. E.
Company: North Carolina DEHNR-Division of Soil & Water _ = EAI_
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 = 022536
Phone: _ _ [phone] : NGItsE�Q•p�'.��
���'�,qN J. G PAC ••�•
!!!lrlrflltl�ti4,
Designed For: Craig Perry - DWQ ID No. 42-7
Route 1 Box 431 Scotland Neck, North Carolina 27874
Halifax County
[phone]
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irigation designs:
1. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thrust block
locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horse power requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required"in the system.
6. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-NRCS standard for Irrigation Water Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-DD.
Note: A buffer strip 50 feet wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perennial
streams and surface waters per DEHNR-DEM Code Section 15A NCAC 2B .0200 - Waste Not Discharged to Surface
Waters.

3
SUPPORTING
CALCULATIONS

)'71{
n'PIV �oC r� C ((PV
r
r e, d sy D -('r"d 5 `�( s eS
I
vl/il dS7/ TO -q �
J5
L
ON
,may .Itl
-957
f-� /J Jn i02 57� O/!7 �� L i f� V O V
Q�' y jrr7F / r -rc.� .. nrr.;l a J ���dC •C1n/ 7L1'JI
b; �� r �rJ SyA� � i ^+oJ� ..•r�X:( �� s�si y 4'Jd� ,�� �``""'' x��l
1j _ 7r
va1 , j ,-, J
Fk � f n
0
1.7NN
N IJN
A A A
ANC
N�
bQ0
W N! UI
XX=
m m m
mmm
w ti H
N N N

i
Ili
IIIIIIN
9��111111111
'
I
IIINI
In

CLIENTS NAMES+ram
COUNTY ibii'
O D A Y S DATE
,ISTANCE TO -N- A Oil
NUMBER OP Pf(313 {
NumeFR OF Plot: ,
NUMBER OF 9QWt�x
NUMBER OF SOW:;R
NUMBER OF SOWS
DEGREE OF 0Doi(
(minimum t. `
(maximum
NUMBER OF VEA�t
TOP LENGTH AT"`"..!!!
TOP WIDTH AT
NORMAL WATER 4.
SEASONAL, H i dam"
LAGOON SOTTO
Depth of Per�4.. i •'
a
Iminimum dwpth,-
(minimum derp't'
SIDE SLOPES +�
Permal-jent Vo I, Y r
Porman@nt Vok
t
,DDITIONAL. bRAi
('i.e. pumpout"..
LENGTH OF PUM
GALLONS OF FRlr~
EXCESS RAIHF ,
25YR/24HR ST- t
F REEBQARD
a '^"
Temporary Ste
'fop of Elam 'E14
Inside Dimonsk.i
Length m
Beg i n Pump i np :i"
Stop Pumping. L'
IGN IS FOR A SINGLE STAGE LAGOON
('RESIDENCE _}
FEEDER ---
NIGH ----- ->
'iNLING
,$DER
NISH•a==m===>
axan.ma.-�a�m�}
'"Ab 59LW)
1b g9LW)
'CCUHULATION >
CRA I G PERRY
HALIFAX COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
I/26/94
V"7il.*(1 FEET
U
4i 0t)
0
U
1.0
0.0 YEARS
1.1~VEL------> 49860 FEET
iEVEL. _-=-===j 179.0 FEET
52.4 FEET
EVATION ==_> 44.6 FEET
ipwmtxa�=-yea-} 45.4'. FEET
-,+ 7.0 foet
A = 6 foot)
A feet)
�Mrrrea�RSg���rY 2.511
54000Q.0 cubic feet
540356.3 cubic feet
.'.SQUARE FEET>
0
SQUARE FEET
`;c►uts ide area)
_D
ISO
DAYS
bAtF,.Y =mm
0
GALLONS
kATION -=3Ix=>
13.3
INCHESS
6.7
INCHES
ao�saaea =-a-a>
1.0
FEET
303279 . R cubic
feet
•' L' :.fir' .
'N- 5
56.8 foot—
Top
of Dam
.`t0th m 2g0.Q feet
5S.2 foot
52.4 feet
•:

1 STEADY ST47M `` j4i; 6HT
;:-kb feeder x 30 lbs. a Q lbs
4000 h•+�s ;,: ili' 't* Y. i n i sh i ng >c 135 lbs. 540000 lbs
O soi+l`�•-anling m 433 lbs. :1i15
O e�'oti�"{` f-k}?!"ogdar sc 52a iba. _ 0 lbs
0 v6wiOr,fir ..` i' Finish x 1417 lbs. _ 1) l b s
TOTfC-,,1p 1 �'^'$'``;.Y':E LIVE WEIGHT (38LW) Z4C.) Qlbs
2. SLUD13F Aft
Blud 001 •'.. i s .at the rate of 0.080 cu. ft. per year
par' Y STATE LIVE WEIGHT in swine.
Ydar' .p':�•".'.� }r' curnEailatinn in dQaign7 +7.4
0.0 cubic feet
3. REQUiRED.''V" OF LAGOON
Dv�f ,i, ;?•l .. :f:, : r -:0 dU. ft. per pound 88LW
Tot'?yl r sk'- LW * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
TOt/iE +Ci E ►;rRr 540000.0 cubic foot
4. NORMAL L€,EVEL
• 4aa.'
Ma
L tt oon liquid level at elevation rF.4 feet
Con i17e,attQm olevaEion 45.4 fast
Lap ••. sr; tid.rmal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial Forrn��la
Ve SS/FIDE1 SS/SIDES DEPTH
2.5
AFtEt���
L'r#
B6544 .4 (AREA OF TOP)
'; �•'. ; ., Q 66E09.0 (AREA OF 80TTOM )
5 771 Et) . 3 (AREA OF MIDSECTION)
QUP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
G 308481.0 66PC19.0 1.167
VOL ' t ,"AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL 4 540556.3 CU . F T .
VOL !' 540000.0 CU . != T .
THe�'.' � 3ION8 OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL
'. 4 FEET LONG BV 1719.0 FEET W I CfE
�i r

5 . D I ICE
PIdL/q'A ontinuouss dike to elevation S6.R feet.
(�Jfy roe- f"10
5. TEMPORARY:",' RED
r 104000 square feet
Area
s..4 •' ,'
0 fdquarts feat
.:7 's"' 144090 aquarp feet
pump s `x '® ISO days.
.r.
6A. Vo-IiA oduced
Vo•1'�iKl +':,' ``::>_ !� SSLW 0.01 gallon/lb. SSLW/day * ISO days
fnping cycle / 7.49 gallons par cu. -ft.
Va 1 it �t; cubic fact
I '
This'i ''�:,f 'of fresh wator- used for washing floors or
vol .4 used for a flush systwm. Flush systems that
racy +' ` waiter are accounted for in 6A.
•�'"7�?'.+{� ,L% :mow
Velzast 150 daym in tha pumping
'ided by 7.48 gallons* per cu. ft.
V4IUR_D cubic feet
6C. Voiir fis ir►4 f➢flccsaw of ovaporaition
Use Ott
;�.� when rainfall exceeds evaporation by Largest
CKcwrr •A ',. IFlrore►►ce) t3.3 inches
Valuts ` ., k'`; r'3 inches DA / 12 inches per foot
VO1Uf11 „' cut31c feet
6D. Vol'ul a. 54' hour storm
VoIU ? �;, :. 7 inches st DA / 12 inches per foot
Vollirrip�,� cubic feet
TQTAdt `RAAY STORAGE
1 129946.5 cubic fee
Q.0 cubic feet
k. tt`•...y f`yi,' '',..,...4'• 115266.7 cubic foot
a•;,,�':,. .%° 'tip 52066.7 cubic feet
..:*,,�'..
TOTAL-" ~` AAQE 303279.9 cubic feet

7. DEPTH OF•8 4 (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
nepth�`i�:wq c ,++ �lbluma of temporary storage divided by surfman
.-,.:.��`':• Lagoon.
303280 cu . f t . / e9644 aq . f t .
3.4 feet
Norma 'l:i' ' Z Iid elevation 52.4 feet
J)apth+!•.!"e_ 4 3.4 feet
1.0 foot
Fr
Top ik�`.;`r°���.+?,a' � 5b .8 feet
::• .:
THE : i THE INSIDE poi OF THE I]AM AT ELEVATION 56.8
FEET BY e00.4 FEET
S. BET BEGIN"r ;: * TION
PUMP:UME
129946.5 cubic font
0.0 cubic foot
113266.7 cubic foot
TQTA:..: `. E 243813.e cubit feet
f1rap #'s::i` olumo of pumped storage divided by turfac"
"*Vleacon at normal water level.
DWPt iA.#pi g ,!A.A 245!21 .2 cu. ft . / 88644 sq f t .
aapty`,� :�.,;, 8.8 feetNo AT
UESii 1 S^ I Ot.l�'V' 1 r APPROVED BY:
DATE.I " u ' `;• ��'°"' BATE
s •:^.'���+fk.�' •;ram.
'L
fix: to

PIPE SIZING
Craig Perry - DWQ ID No. 42-7
Route 1 Box 431 Scotland Neck, North Carolina 27874
Halifax County
[phone]
Step 1 - Size pipe to be used for supply line and laterals (total pressure cannot exceed 10 psi,in any line)
Use Hazen & Williams
Hf - 10.45"L'((Q/C)"1.852)1D• 4.87
Where.
Hf - Friction head loss in foot
L = Linear length of pipe in feet
Q Q Flowrate in gallons per minute (gpm)
C Pipe Coefficient
0 = Pipe Diameter
Site Design Patameters
Flowrate of Sprinkler Selected (gpm) = 17.1
Maximum No. of Sprinklers in a zone 15 Cannot be greater than 15
Maximum Flowrate On a Lateral 256.5
Longest Lateral Line
C = 150
ID No,
Flowrate
m
Hf In Lateral
Section
feet
Diameter
Inches
Hf si
<10 si check
Longest Lateral
No. of Sprinklers
Section Servicln
Hf in Lateral
for pump TDH
feet
Sprinkler No. 1 (15 Sprink)
Sprinkler No. 2 (14 Sprink)
Sprinkler No. 3 (13 Sprink)
Sprinkler No. 4 (12 Sprink)
Sprinkler No. 5 (11 Sprink)
Sprinkler No. 6 (10 Sprink)
prinkler No. 7 (9 Sprink)
Sprinkler No. 8 (8 Sprink)
Sprinkler No. 9 (7 Sprink)
Sprinkler No. 10 (6 S prink)
Sprinkler No. 11 (5 Sprink)
Sprinkler No. 12 (4 Sprink)
Sprinkler No. 13 (3 Sprink)
Sprinkler No.14 (2 Sprink)
5 rinkler No. 15 1 Sprink)
256.5
1.485
4
0,64
ok
14
1.49
239.4
2.440
4
1.06
ok
13
2.13
222.3
2.127
4
0.92
ok
12
1.83
205.2
1.834
4
0.79
ok
10
5.31
188.1
9.337
3
2.76
ok
8
3.51
171
5.311
3
2.30
ok
5
1.47
153.9
4.370
3
1.89
ok
2
1.94
136.8
3.513
3
1.52
ok
1
0.54
119.7
2,744
3
1.19
ok
0
0.00
102.E
2.062
3
0.89
ok
0
0.00
85.5
1.471
3
0.64
ok
0
0.00
68.4
7.011
2
3,04
ok
0
0.00
51.3
4.115
2
1.78
ok
0
0.00
34.2
1.942
2
0.84
ok
0
0.00
17.1
0.538
2
0.23
ok
0
0,00
Total Lateral TDH Hf feet
18.22
Longest Supply
Lina
Max. Sprink.
i5
Q (gpm) Max.
256.5
L (ft.) =
1,350
C =
150
D=
6
HfM)= 6.186
Hf (psi) = 2.68 ok
Total Hf (ft.) = 24.408
Total Lateral TDH W (pal) - 7.90 Less than 10 psi ok

SIZING THE PUMP
Craig Perry - DWQ ID No. 42-7
Route 1 Box 431 Scotland Neck, North Carolina 27874
Halifax County
[phone]
Apply energy equation between points 1) lagoon water surface and 2) sprinkler head.
Step 1 Determine Total Dtinamic Head (TDH)
P1lwater density + Vi **2/2g + Zi + TDH = P2/water density + V2**2/2g + Z2 + Hf
Assume friction head in the suction pipe and velocity head throughout the system to be negligible.
P1 = 0 (water pulled from a free surface.)
this Yeilds:
TDH = P2Avater density + Z2 + Hf - Z1
Z1(ft.) =
100 At lagoon stop pumping elevation
g (ft/sec**2)
32.4
Z2 (ft) =
109.5 At Sprinkler (1.5' above max ground elevation)
P2 (psi) =
55
Hf (ft.) =
24.41
TDH (ft.) = 160.83 (actual)
Add 10% to account for wear and tear on the pump and minor losses
in the valves and fittings
TDH (ft.) = 176.91 (design)
Step - 2 Size Pump using a Performance curve
Pump Model Selection: B2 112 ZPL
RPM 3600
hp = 20
eff.(%) = 70.25
Std. Impeller Dia (in.) = 7 11/16
Steo - 3 Detenmine Horse Power Requirements thp)
hp = (Q"TDH)/(3960*eff.)
hp = 16.31 ok
Step - 4 Size Impeller
Impeller Diameter should be trimmed slightly based on manufacturers recommendations
Stets - 5 Check NPSHA
NPSHR (ft.) per manufacturers Sp. = 12
NPSHA (ft.) = Ha + Hs + Hf + Hvp
Assume Hf and Hvp to be neg. while Ha = 14.7psi or 34 feet
Hs (ft) = 7
NPSHA (ft.) = 27 ok

BERK ELEY P U M PS
_ TYPE "B" RATING CURVES
MOTOR DRIVE
m
CURVE 4075
DATE 1-27-89
PAGE 4.01
SUPERSEDES
Curve 4075 Page 4,01
Dated 1-2-86

THRUST BLOCK SIZING
Craig Perry - DWQ ID No. 42-7
Route 1 Box 431 Scotland Neck, North Carolina 27874
Halifax County
[phone]
For 90 degree elbow
A = ((98'H"D"2)/B)sin a2
Where,
H = TDH (ft.) = 176.91
D (in.) = 6
B (lbs/sq. ft.) = 650
a = 90
A (sq. ft.) = 4.71
Dead Ends and Tees = 0.7.90 degrees (sq. ft.) = 3.30
Ground Entry or Z pipes = 1.33 " 90 degrees (sq. ft.) = 6.27
Where,
H = TDH (ft) - 176.91
D (in.) = 4
B (lbs/sq. ft) = 650
a = 90
A (sq. ft) = 2.10
Dead Ends and Tees = 0.7.90 degrees (sq. ft.) = 1.47
Ground Entry or Z pipes = 1.33.90 degrees (sq. ft) = 2.79
Where,
H = TDH (ft) = 176.91
D (in.) = 3
B (lbs/sq, ft) = 650
a = 90
A (sq. ft.) = 1.18
Dead Ends and Tees = 0.7' 90 degrees (sq. ft) =
0.83
Ground Entry or Z pipes = 1.33 " 90 degrees (sq. ft.) =
1.57
Where,
H = TDH (ft.) = 176.91
D (in.) = 2
B (Ibs/sq. ft.) = 650
a = 90
A (sq. ft.) = 0.52
Dead Ends and Tees = 0.7' 90 degrees (sq. ft.) =
0.37
Ground Entry or Z pipes = 1.33 ' 90 degrees (sq. ft.) =
0.70

PIPE &
SPRINKLER
CHARTS

SIZE
boo
1.00
O❑
1.315
ID
1.195
WALL
O.D60
THK
FRICTION LOSS CHARACTERISTICS
PVC CLASS 160 IPS PLASTIC PIPE
(1120. 12201 SDR 26 C - ISO
PSI LOSS PER 1DO FEET OF PIPE (PSI/100 FT)
Sizes 1" 7hru 5". Flow GPM 1 thru 1250.
125
1.50
2.DO 250 3.00
1.660
1900
2.375 2875 35DO
1.532
1.754
2.193 2,6553230
0.064
0.073
0.091 D.110 0.135
350
4.DO
5.00
SIZE
4.DOO
4.500
5563
OD
3.632
4.154
5,133
ID
0.154
0.173
0214
WALL
THK
NN
l!'7
N
t19
a fA
•� U!
•� vi
oa
ZLL
y 0
y0.
r!1 p
and
i/3 o
elG
Vi p
.2
y p
.2
m=;
GA C
`n4
y a
mii
y 0
Via.
yy G
b4;
LL.=
ALL
c .-j
>LL
R.J
I.L.
ILJ
}LL
dJ
�11L
�J
�lL
4 J
LL
dJ
ALL
�J
ALL
S.J
LL.U'
1
0.28
0.02
p.77
0.01
0.13
0.00
1
2
0.57
0.06
0.34
D.02
0.26
0.01
0.161
0.00
2
3
0.85
0.14
0.52
0.D4
0.39
0.02
0.25
0.01
3
4
1.14
0.23
0.69
0.07
0.53
0.04
D.33
0.01
023
0.00
4
5
1.42
0.35
0,86
0.11
0.66
0.05
13.4
0:02
0-28
0.07
6
1.71
0.49
1,D4
0.15
0.79
0.08
p.50
0.03
p,34
0.01
023
D,00
6
T
1,99
0.66
127
p.20
D_92
0.10
0.59
p.03
O.aD
0,01
D27
0.01
7
8
2 28
0.84
1,39
0.25
7.06
O.i3
0.67
0.04
0.46
O.D2
0.31
0.01
8
9
2.57
1.05
1.56
0.31
1.79
0.16
p_76
0.05
0.52
0.02
0.35
0.01
026
1)
9
1 D
2.85
1.27
1.73
0.38
1.22
0.20
0.84
0.07
0.57
0.03
0.39
0.01
0.2
D.01
10
11
3.14
1.52
7 91
0.45
7,45
023
0.93
0,08
0.63
0.03
0.43
0.01
0,32
0.01
71
12
3.42
1.78
2,08
0.53
1.59
028
1.D1
0.09
0.69
0.04
0,46
0.07
Q 35
0.01
026
D.00
72
7e
3.99
2.37
2.43
0.71
1.85
0.37
1.18
0.12
0B1
0.05
0.54
0.02
0.41
0.01
0.33
0.01
14
16
4.57
3.D4
2.78
0.91
2.12
0.47
1.35
0.16
092
O.D6
0.62
0.02
0.47
0.01
0.37
0.01
16
18
5.14 r
3.76
3.12
1.13
2.38
0.58
1.52
0.20
1.04
0.08
0.70 1
0.03
0.53
0.02
0.42
0.01 1
1
20
5.71
4.59
3.47
1-37
2.55
0.71
1.69
0.24
1.15
0_D9
0.76
0.04
D59
0.02
0.47
0.01
20
22
628
5.4.8
3.82
1.64
2.91
0.85
1.86
0.29
1.27
0,11•
0.86
0.04
0.65
0.02
0.52
0.01
0.34
0.00
22
2e
6-85
6.44
4.17
•1.92
3.18
1.00
2.03
0.34
7.38
0.13
Dg3
0.05
0.71
0.03
OS6
0.02
0.37
0.01
24
26
7.42
7.47
4,51
2.23
3.44
1.15
2.20
0.39
1.50
0.15
1.01
0.06
0.77
0,03
0,67
0.02
0.40
0.01
26
28
799
8.57
4.86
2.56
3.77
1.32
2.37
0.45
1.62
0.18
1.09
0.07
0.83
0,04
0.66
0.02
D.43
0.01
28
30
8,57
9.74
5.21
2.91
3.97
1.50
2.54
0.57
1.73
0-20
1.17
O.D8
029
0.04
0.70
0.02
0.46
0.01
30
35
9.99
1295
2.08
3.87
4,64
2. DO
2.96
0.68
2.02
027
1.36
0.10
7,04
0,05
0.82
0.03
0 54
0.01
35
40
11.42
1659
"S
4.95
5.30
2-56
3.39
0.86
2,31
0.34
1-56
0.13
1.19
0.07
0.94
p.04
0.61
0.01
40
45
12.85
20.63
7B2
6.16
5.96
3.19
3.81
1.08
2.60
D.42
1.75
0.16
1,34
0.09
1.06
Q.OS
13.69
0.02
45
SO
14.28
25.07
8.69
7.49
6.63
3,89
4.24
1.31
2.29
0.52 1
1.95
0.20
1.49
0.10
1.18
0.06
0.77
0.42 I
50
55
15.71
29.97
9.56
a 93
7.29
4.62
4.66
1.56
3.18
0.62
2.15
0.24
1.64
0.12
1.30
0.07
0.25
O.D2
55
SO
17.14
35.14
10.43
1D.49
7.95
5.43
5.09
_ 1_83
• 3.47
0.72
2.34
028
1.79
0.15
1.41
0.08
0.92
0.03
60
65
18.57
4D_75
11M
12.17
8.62
6.3D
5 51
2.12
3.76
0.84
2.54
0.32
194
0.17
1.53
0.09
1.00
0.D3
65
7D
1999
45.76
72.16
1396
9 28
7 23
5.93
2.4d
4.05
0.96
2.73
0.37
2.09
0.19
7.65
0.11
1.D8
0.04
70
75
13.03
15.86
9.94
$21
6.36
2.77
4.34
1.09
2.93
0.42
2 2a
0.22
1.77
0.12
1.16
0.04
75
80
S7 88
t0.fi0
925
6.78
3.12
4,63
1.23
2.12
OA
2.39
0.25
1.89
0.14
1.23
D.05
80
85
1a.77
20.00
71 27
10-25
7.27
3A9
491
1-M
3.32
0.53
2S4
0.28
2.00
0.16
1.37
0.06
85
90
113.9q
15.64
2223
127.=13.26
7193
7151
7.63
3.88
5.20
1.53
3.51
0.59
2.69
D.31
2.12
0,17
1.39
0.06
90
95
16.51
2458
12.89
72,72
8.05
429
5.49
1.69
3.71
0.65
2-84
0.34
2.24
0.19
1.47
0.07
95
100
17.38
13.99
8.48
4.72
5.78
1.86
3.91
0.72
2,99
D-37
2,36
0.21
1.54
0.081100
110
19.12
32.24
14,58
16,69
9.23
6.36
2-22
4.30
D96
329
0.45
2.60
0-25
1.70
0.09
110
120
15.91
19.61
iD.78
6.61
6.94
2.61
4.69
1.01
3.59
0.52
2.83
0.30
115
0.17
120
130
17.24
22.74
11.02
15.63
7.67
7S2
3.03
5.D8
1.17
3.29
0.61
3.07
0.34
2.D1
0-12
130
140
18.56
26.09
11.87
89D
9.10
3.47
5.47
1.34
4.19
0.70
2,31
0.39
2.16
0.14
140
750
19-B9
29,64
12.72
10.00
8 68
3.94
5.86
1.52
4.48
0.79
3.54
0.45
2,321-1
S,
150
160
13.57
11.27
.9.26
4.45
6.25
1.71
4.7a
OB9
3.78
0.50
2.47
D.18
16O
170
14.42
12.61
9S3
4,97
6.64
192
5.D8
1.00
4.07
0.56
2.6,E
020
170
780
1527
14.D2
10.41
5.53
7,03
2.13
5.3$
1.11
425
0.63
2.78
0.22
180
790
16.11
15.49
1099
5.11
7.43
:235
5.68
'_1.23
4.49
0.69
2.94
0.25
190
0
16 6
17.D3
11 57
6 7
7
.59
5.98
1.35
4.72
0.76
1 3.09
0,27
200
225
19.08
21.79
13,02
8.36
8.79
322
6.73
1.68
5.31
0.95,75
3.48
0.34
225
250
;�
14.47
10.16
9.77
3,91
7.48
2.04
5.97
7
3S7
0,41
250
275
�L:
7591
12.12
10.715
4.67
823
2.4L4
650
1.37
4,25
0.49
275
300
17.36
1424
11.73
5.49
857
2-86
7.09
_1.61'
4.64
0.58
300
325
1 fX.B1
16.57
72.70
6.36
9.77
.3.=
7.98
1,87
5.03
0.671.
325
350
13.68
7.30
1D.47
3.81
827
2.15
5.41
0.77
350
375
14.66
B29
11.22
4,33
8.86
2.44
5-80
'.'0.87
375
400
ITL
1
15.64
9.35
11 S7
4Z8
9,45
2.75 -
6:19
0.98
400
425
16,62
10.46
12.72
5.46
10.04
'3.07
-.6.5B
:,7.10
425
450
77.59
11.67
73.46
6A7
70.63
3-42
-6-96
1.7a
450
475
18.57
12.25
14.27
6.70
11.23
3.78
7.35
' .1.35
475
500
19 55
14.13
14,96
7.37
1 7B2
4.15
7.74
1.48
500
550
16.46
SBO
13.00
1,13,36
4,96.
- 8.51
7.77
550
6DO
'1795
10.33
14.16
:552
929
2.08
600
19.45
71.99
6.75
10.06
_'
2.41
6511
"OD
'6-55
7.75
10.83
2.77
70O
750
17.73
8B0
11.61
3,14
75D
BOO
18,91
9S2
1228
_
'3,54
8DO
850
13,16
-3 96
850
900
1113.93
4,41
900
950
14.71
427
950
1D00
15.48
5.36
1DOO
105 0
1625
.586
1050
1100
17.03
. 6.39
1100
1150
17,SO
6.94
115D
1200
18.58
7.51
1200
725D
19.35
$.10
1250
Note: Shaded areas of churn inrf;-11. - -

FRICTION LOSS CHARACTERISTICS
PVC CLASS 160 IPS PLASTIC PIPE
0120. 12201 SOR 26 C - 150
PSI LOSS PER 100 FEET OF PIPE fPS11100 FTI
Sizes 6" thru 12"
Flow GPM 1 thru 5000
SIZE
6.00
8.00
10,00
12.00
SIZE
6.00
8,00
10.00
12.00
00
6.625
8.625
10.750
12.750
OD
6.625
8.625
10.750
12.750
ID
6.115
7.961
9.924
11.770
ID
6.115
7,961
9.924
11.770
WALL
0.225
0.332
0.413
0.490
SHALL
0.225
0.332
0.413
0,490
THK
TH K
t
0
O y
C y
M
• Q N
• Q rf �
�
4
m4
N p
a1d
N o
m4
N p
da
y b
LL. G7
> LL
(L J
LL
a:J
> 1L
iL -j
LL
a:.J
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
35
0.38
0.00
40
0.43
0.01
45
0,49
0.01
50
0.54
0.01
55
0.60
0.01
60
0.65
0.01
65
0.70
0.01
70
0.76
0.02
0.45
0.00
0.02
0,48
0.01
80
0.87
0,02
0.51
0,01
85
0,92
0.02
0.54
0.01
90
0.98
0,03
0.57
0.01
95
1.03
0.03
0.61
0.01
100
1.09
0.03
0.64
0.01
110
1.20
0.04
0.70
0.01
120
1.30
0.05
0.77
0.01
130
1.41
0.05
0.83
0.01
0,53
0.00
140
1.52
0.06
0.90
0.02
0.57
0.01
150
1.63
0.07
0.96
0.02
0.62
0.01
160
1.74
0.08
1.02
0.02
0.66
0.01
170
1.85
0.09
1.09
0,02
0.70
0,01
180
1.96
0.10
1.15
0.03
0.74
0.01
190
2.07
0.11
1.22
0.03
0.78
0.01
200
2.18
0.12
1.28
1 0-031
0.82
0.01
0.58
0.00
225
2.45
0.14
1,44
0.04
0.93
0,01
0.66
0,01
250
2.72
0.18
1.60
0.05
1.0J
0.02
0,73
0.01
275
3.00
0.21
1.77
0.06
1.13
0.02
0,80
0.01
300
3.27
0.25
1.93
0.07
1.24
0.02
0.88
0.01
3251
3.54
0.29
2.09
0.00
1.34
0.03
0.95
0.01
350
3,81
0.33
2.25
0.09
1.44
0.03
1.03
0.01
375
4,09
0.37
2.41
0.10
1.55
0.D4
1.10
0,02
400
4.36
0.42
2.57
0.12
1,65
0.04
1,17
0.02
425
4.63
0,47
2.73
0.13
1.76
0.04
1.25
0.02
450
4.90
0.52
2.89
0.141
1.861
0.051
3
0,02
475
5,18
0.58
3.05
0.16
1.96
0.05
1.39
0.02
500
5,45
0.63
3.21
0.18
2.07
0.06
1,47
0.03
550
6.00
0.76
3.54
0.21
2.27
0.07
1,61
0.031
600
6.54
0.89
3.86
0.25
2,48
0.08
1.76
0.04
(Continued)
Z7
Z
27
3
C N
•p N
G N
p N
N
oR;
mom'
N
L17 p
and
N
C
4�
rii N
m=,
Lri C
u- t,a
> LL
d J
> LL
aA J
.
> U:
j
Ll -.a
`! LL
b J
650
7.09
1.03
4.18
0.29
2.69
0.10
1.91
0.04
700
7.63
1.18
4.50
0.33
2,89
0.11
2,06
0.05
750
6.18
1.34
4.82
0.37
3.10
0.13
2.20
0.06
800
8.72
1.51
5.15
0.42
3.31
0.14
2.35
0.06
850
9.27
1.69
5.47
0.47
3,52
0.16
2,50
0.07
900
9,81
1.88
5.79
0.52
3,72
0.18
2.65
0.08
950
10.36
2.08
6.11
0.58
3.93
0.20
2,79
0.09
1000
10.91
2.29
6.43
0.63
4,14
0.22
2.94
0.09
1050
11.45
2.50
6.75
0.69
4.34
0.24
3.09
0.10
1100
12 001
2.73
7 08
0,76
4.55
0.26
3.23
0.11
1150
12.54
2.96
7.40
0.82
4.76
0.28
3.38
0.12
1200
13.09
3.20
7.72
0.89
4.97
0.30
3.53
0.13
1250
13.63
3.45
8.04
0.96
5.17
0.33
3.68
0.14
1300
14.18
3.72
8.36
1.03
5.38
0.35
3.82
0.15
1350
14.72
3.98
8,69
1.10
5.59
0.38
3.97
0.16
1400
15.27
4.26
9.01
1.18
5,79
0.40
4.12
0.18
1450
15.82
4.55
9.33
1.26
6.00
0.43
4,27
0.19
1500
16.36
4.84
9.65
1,34
6.21
0.46
4.41
0.20
1550
16.91
1 5.15
9.97
1.43
6.42
0.49
4.56
0.21
1600
17.45
5.46
10.30
1.51
6.62
0.52
4,71
0.23
1650
18.00
5.78
10.62
1.60
6.83
0.55
4.85
0.24
1700
18.54
6.11
70.94
1.69
7.04
0.58
5.00
0.25
1750
19,09
6.44
11.26
1.78
7.24
0.61
5.15
0.27
1800
19.63
6.79
t 1.58
1.88
7.45
0.64
5.30
0628
1850
11.90
1.98
7.66
0.68
5.44
0.30
1900
12.23
2.08
7.87
0.71
5.59
0.31
1950
12.55
2.18
8.07
0.75
5.74
0.33
2000
12.87
2.29
8.28
0.78
5.89
0.34
2100
13.51
2.50
R-69
0.86
618
0.37
2200
14.16
2.73
9.11
0.93
6,47
0.41
2300
14.80
2.96
9.52
1.01
6.77
0.4-4
2400
15.45
3.20
9.94
1.10
7.06
0.48
2500
16.09
3.46
10.35
1.18
7.36
0.52
2600
16.73
3.72
10.77
1.27
7.65
0.55
2700
17.38
3.98
11.18
1.36
7.95
0.59
2800
18.02
4.26
1 t.59
1.46
8.24
0.64
2900
18.66
4.55
12.01
1.56
8.64
0.68
3000
19.31
4.84
12.42
1.66
8.83
0.72
3100
19.95
5.15
12,84
1.76
9.12
0.77
3200
13.25
1.87
9,42
0.8 t
3300
13.67
1.98
-9.71
0.86
3400
14,08
2.09
10.01
0,9t
3500
14.49
2.20
10.30
0.96
3600
14.91
2.32
10.60
1.01
3700
15.32
2.44
10.89
1.07
3800
15.74
2.57
11.19
1.12
3900
16.15
2.69
11.48
1.17
4000
16.57
2.82
11,78
1.23
4100
16.98
2.96
12 07
1.29
4200
17.39
3.09
12.36
1.35
4300
17.81
3.23
12.66
1.41
4400
18.22
3.37
12.95
1.47
4500
18.64
3.51
13.251
1.53
4600
19.05
3.66
13,54
1.59
4700
19.47
3.81
13.64
1.66
4800
19.8B
3.96
14.13
1.73
4900
14,43
1.79
5000
114,72,
1.86
U
Nate: Shaded areas of chart indicate velocities over 5' per second. Use with Caution.

360' rotation
impact sprinkler
Models 7025RD-1-1" M, 7025RD-1-3/4" F,
7025RD-1-1" F, 7025RD-1-1;14" F
PERFORMANCE DAT.A`-
�,: Nozzle Pressure (DW
:''•' . =35.' ' '40' 45 50 53 60 70 75 80
14 Nozie P/r-1
Flow rgprnl :. .` '
;834 . ':8.91 "
9.45 .
' 9.97.
10.5
' -10-9 _
. 11.4 _.
113
_12-2 . _ 126.
Sou. Base Press. fpso
35.8 40.9
45.9
51.0
56.0
61.0
66.1
71.2
76.2
81.2
Diam.on-13"Riser,'_ ::-.; �:..
7Dc ; 110"
115
"f2n
124 ..'`179.
132
-135
133 '
140
Dian. on 6'4tiser ..: :: >':::;
�14�. `720
125
130
135
136
142
145
149
151
Dlam on 12' Riser"~
--1zi ' -129
134
139
143
147 .
149
151
153
155
-16 Nozzle IWI
Prow rgpm
U-S '.
11.6
12.3
13.0
13.6
'14.2-• '
14.8
153
15.9
16.4
SDkr, ease Press. ipsn
36.0
41.2
4c.2
51.4
56.4
61.5
66.6
71.8 -
76.8
81.9
Dam, an 1.5' Riser
'114 ,
118
123
128
153
137
141
.144
147
150
Diarn. on 6' Riser
-322
730
135
140
145
148
150
1530
156
159
Dam. on 12' Riser
130
136
141
146
150
153
156
159
162
164
19 Nozzle f°•v'r''
Flow fgoml
13.6
14.6
155
16.3
17.1
17.8
18.6
193
7.0.0
20.6
Soler. base Press. (psi)
36.4
41.9
46.8
51.9
57.0
62.2 -
6-7.3
72A
773
82.6
Dam on 1S' Riser
122
126
131
135
140
145
149
151
155
152
Dam on 6' Riser
129
136
141
145 .
150
153
156
159
Sot
164
Dam. on 12' Riser
136
142
148
152
156
160
1c"3.
165
169
171
{ 20 Nozzle f% r.., r
Fiow lgpml
16.8
17.9
19.0
2D.0
21.0
ZZA
22.9
2=.7
245
253
Sokr. 625e Press. (MU
37.0
42.2
47.4
52.5
37.7
62.8
662
-73.3
78.5
83.7
Dam on 1.5' Riser
126
'131 ,
137
141
146
150
154
157
161
16a
DL2r on6'Riser
1-3.2
-139
'145
149
lu
158
161
164
167
17D
DiarrL on'12' Riser
140
147
157
157
162
165
169
17Z
174
176
-22 Nozzle r! 1
Flow fgpm)
.=2
.21.6
22 °
24.1
2:a'
26.4
275
285
29.6
305
Soler. use Press, fpsir
37.6
43.0
4E2
53.4
58.7
64.0
69.2
74.4
79.6
85.0
Diem on 13'Riser
129
134
139
-145
150
155
158
162
160
168
Diann_ on 6' Riser
-135 ,
-142
147
152
138
162
166
169
173
175
Diarn. on 12' Riser
144
:150
156
'151
166
170
174
176
179
-1 S2
• 24 NozZ1e 0,k-;
Flow fgam
-23.8 .75.4
2fi.9
M. .4
.Z3.8
31.1
'52.4
33.6
34_8
SDkr. Base Press, foso
38.4 45.7
49.0
54.4
59.8
65.2
70.5
75.6
BD.8
86.6
0,am. Dn1S' Riser
131 137
143
'148
1:3
1SB
163
166
170
177
Dam. onG-Riser
138.'•145
151
-156
162
166
17D
173
177
179
❑:aryl. on 12' Riser
148 154
i50
1eS
170
175
179
182
1B5
1137
'Fr urn. rollco Jrtu:rl Iry C ilu,�n I'«lulinn errnutrk ne:n• zhrnr slrl�in hl naunn. All tlu i:iexhrwn r,in h•ri.
�-tiarkl:Ar.1 nnrih-
\frrl- \1:nauum arr:rni ilir"•hr n 15' rlr r :Irwnr• nwflc. uun_ 5'11." !X_'fh MIMI' SI 50 ll'i

COMPONENTS OF
ANANIMAL WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN

COMPONENTS OF .kN ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN t
General Information:
A. Completed Certification Form
B. Site Schematic
I1. Site Evaluation and Site Investigation
A. Existing Operations:
1. Evaluate proximity of the waste storage facility to a 100-year floodplain
2. Evaluate dam safety
3. Evaluate proximity of wetlands to waste application area
B. New or Expanding Operations:
1. NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC-CPA-17 (attached) or equivalent
2. Hazard Classification (NC-ENG-34) (attacbed)
3. Site Map
a) Location and elevation of borings and/or test pits in relation to
established grid layout
b) Borrow area located (if one is required)
c) Soils map included
d) Statement concerning obsen-ation of cultural resources (if applicable)
4. Wetlands Detennination
III. Design Survey (for Ne,,v and Expanding facilities)
A. Location' and elevation of all buildings, pads, ponds, ditches roads, utilities,
fence lines, discharge pipes, wells, and any other structures that are in or near the
design area. r
B. Location of property Iines, perennial streams, wetland areas, and any other
borders that lie close to and affect the design area.
C. Topography of facility location. V
D. Areas where surface runoff is to be controlled, both polluted and non -polluted.
E. Dimensions and elevations of existing facilities.
F. Hazard classification data as needed.
IV. Facility Design
A. Lagoon/Storage Facility Design
1. Existing Operations:
a) Show design needs (i.e., storage).
b) Show measurements and calculated volumes
2. New Construction:
a) Show design needs (i.e., storage).
b) Show construction inspection notes from NRCS standards to include
liner inspection
c) Consideration for emergency spillway
Additional items due to changes in MRCS Standards and regulations are indicated in bold.
CANVMP, December 6, 1996, Page 1

Componcnts of an An.:.-nal Waste Management Plan
B. Runoff control measures
I. \ atcm-ays
I Diversions
3. Riparian buffers - see NRCS Filter Strip Standard 395
4. Filter strips
5. Roof guttering
6. Others
C. Land Application System
1. Irrigation systems
a) Parameters for existing equipment
b) Designs for new systems
2. Tank spreaders
3. Box spreaders
4. Others
D. Operation and Maintenance Plan - include information about inspecting:
1. Pool Area - look for:
a) Undesirable vegetative grown
b) Floating or lodged debris
I Embankment
a) Settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
b) Side slope stability - slumps or bulges
c) Wet or damp areas on the back slope
d) Erosion due to lack of vegetation or wave action
e) Rodent damage
3. Pipes
a) Condition of pipes - look for:
(1) separation of joints
(2) cracks or breaks
(3) accumulation of salts or minerals
b) .-Extend out into the lagoon beyond the toe of the bank slope
c) B: supported by piers, posts, or a cradle to prevent sagging,
4. Vegetation - brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled by
mowing, spraying, chopping, etc.
5. Pumps - check for proper operation of:
a) Recyciing pumps
b) Lrrgation pumps
6. Outside surface water diversions - inspect your diversion system for the
foIlo"�in¢:
a) Adequate vegetation
b) Diversion capacity
c) P.idge height
V. Waste Utiliz_tion Plan
A. Maps of ti_Ids to be used for waste application
B. Amount of manure produced/used annually

Components of an Animal Waste Management Plan
C. Waste application method
D. Dominant soil series by field for fields that will be used for waste application
E. Crops to be grown by field
F. Realistic yield expectations (R.Y.E.)of the crops to be grown where data is
available
G. Nitrogen application rate by field based on R.Y.E. or recommendations from a
Iand grant university if R.Y.E. data is not available. Also, a N balance which
equals N applied minus R.Y.E. N rate Qbs/acre).
H. «caste application windows based on when the receiving crops are actively
.growing. Waste applications should be timed such that waste storage is not
exceeded any time during the year.
I. N-RCS irrigation parameters
J. Required specifications from NRCS Waste Utilization Plan Standard 633.
K. Calibration information
L. Waste sampling for nutrient analysis within 60 days of land appIication
Al. AnnuaI soil sampling
1. Lime requirement
2. iMeasurement of Copper accumulation
3. Measurement of Zinc accumulation
V1. Record Keeping:
A. Required - in order to satisfy the Division of Water Quality's farm inspection
procedures, the following items need to be available at the individual farm:
1. 'Waste application records
2. Map of farm fields including irrigation fields and acreage
3. Certified Waste Management Plan (if applicable)
4. «Vaste sample analysis or calculation of waste constituents
B. Recommended - it may be beneficial for you to maintain the additional
following records for verification of Best Manatiement Practices (BMPs):
1. Dail), farm rain records
2. Weekly lagoon level (freeboard) records
3. Soils analysis
4. Animal population
3. Crop yields
V11. Emergency Action Plan should include provisions for:
A. Description on haw to stop the release of the waste
B. D=scription on how to assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
darnazes.
C. Phone numbers for contact at the appropriate agencies
`'III. Odor Control
A. Checklist of potential odor sources
B. Site -specific management practices to minimize odor sources

Components of an Animal Waste Nianaccment Plan
IX. Insect Control
A. Checklist of potential insect sources
B. Site -specific management practices to minimize insect probelms
X. Provision for Disposing of Alortalities

STATIONARY
SPRINKLER FIELD
CALIBRATION PR 0 CED URES

_ - Field Calibration Procedures
_ -for. Animal -Wastewater'Application..Equipment
_ _ = STATIONARY - -- =
SPRINKLER
IRR1,GATl0N...SYSTEM = -
_ - - � Y ,` � _� r` I ^' `'' ` _ _ .J `_ `\ i I y -� �\- ice' '' � � �- `ram`,", - -• - _•
"North Carotin"a .Coaperotive ..-
_ Extension' Service
Corohno State_ University

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
STATIONARY
SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
General Guidelines
Land application equipment used on animal production farms must be field
calibrated or evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables
according to state rules that went into effect September 1, .1996. Technical
Specialist certifying waste management plans after September 1, 1996, must
also certify that operators have been provided calibration and adjustment
guidance for all land application equipment. The rules apply to irrigation sys-
tems as well as all other types of liquid, slurry, or solid application equipment.
Information presented in manufacturers' charts are based on average
operating conditions for relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and appli-
cation rates change over time as equipment ages and components wear. As a
result, equipment should be field calibrated regularly to ensure that applica-
tion rates and uniformity are consistent with values used during the system
design and given in manufacturers' specifications. Field calibration is a simple
procedure involving collection and measurement of the material being
applied at several locations in the application area. This publication con-
tains step-by-step guidelines for field calibration of stationary sprinkler
irrigation systems.
Operating an irrigation system differently than
assumed in the design will alter the application rate,
uniformity of coverage, and subsequently the apph-
cation uniformity. Operating with excessive pressure
results in smaller droplets, greater potential for drift,
and accelerates wear of the sprinkler nozzle. Pump
wear tends to reduce operating pressure and flow.
With continued use, nozzle wear results in an in-
crease in the nozzle opening, which wMAncrease the
discharge rate while decreasing the wetted diameter.
Clogging of nozzles or crystallization of main lines
can result in increased pump pressure but reduced
flow at the sprinider. Plugged intakes will reduce
operating pressure. An operating pressure below
design pressure greatly reduces the coverage diameter
and application uniiorrnity. Field calibration helps
ensure that nutrients from animal waste are applied
uniformly and at proper rates.
The calibration of a stationary sprinkler irrigation
system involves setting out collection containers,
operating the system, measuring the amount of
wastewater collected in each container, and then
computing the average depth of application (applica-
tion volume) and application uniformity.
An in -line flow meter installed in the main
irrigation line provides a good estimate of the total.
volume pumped from the lagoon during each irriga-
tion cycle. The average application depth can be
determined by dividing the pumped volume by the
application area. The average application depth is
computed from the formula:
Average application depth Cinches)
Volume pumped (gallons)
27,154 (gal/ac-in) X Application area (acres)
The average application depth is the average
amount applied throughout the field. Unfortunately,
sprinklers do not apply the same depth of water
thoughout their wetted area.Under normal operat-
ing conditions, application depth decreases towards
the outer perimeter of the wetted diameter. Station-
ary sprinkler systems are designed to have overlap of
50 to 65 percent of the wetted sprinkler diameter to
compensate for the declining application along the
lJ

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
outer perimeter. When operated at the design pres-
sure, this overlap results in acceptable application
uniformity.
When operated improperly, well -designed systems
will not provide acceptable application uniformity.
For example, if the pressure is too low, the application
depth will be several times higher near the center of
sprinkler and water will not be thrown as far from the
sprinkler as indicated in manufacturers' charts. Even
through the average application depth may be accept-
able, some areas receive excessively high application
while others receive no application at all.
When applying wastewater high in nutrients, it is
important to determine the application uniformity.
Collection containers distributed throughout the
application area must be used to evaluate application
uniformity. Many types of containers can be used to
collect flow and determine the application unifor-
mity. Standard rain gauges work best and are recom-
mended because they already -have a graduated scale
from which to read the application depth.
Pans, plastic buckets, jars, or anything with a
uniform opening and cross section can be used,
provided the container is deep enough (at least 4
inches deep) to prevent splash and excessive evapora-
tion, and the liquid collected can be easily trans-
ferred to a scaled container for measuring. All con-
tainers should be the same size and shape.
Ali collection containers should be set up at the
same height relative to the height of the sprinkler
nozzle (discharge elevation ). Normally, the top of
each container should be no more than 36 inches
above the ground. Collectors should be located so
that there is no interference from the crop. The crop,
canopy should be trimmed to preclude interference
or splash into the collection container.
Calibration should be performed duri.rig periods
of low evaporation. Best times are before 10 a.m. or
after 4 p.m. on days with light wind (less than 5
miles per hour. On cool, cloudy days the calibration
can be performed any time when wind velocity is less
than 5 miles per hour.
General Guidelines for Stationary
Sprinklers
Rain gauges or other collection containers should be
spaced in a grid patterns fully enclosing the "effective"
wetted area defined by the sprinkler spacing. The
most common spacing pattern for stationary sprin-
klers is a square spacing where the distance between
sprinklers is the same as the spacing between laterals.
The spacing between sprinklers and laterals is nor-
mally between 50 to 65 percent of the sprinkler
wetted diameter specified by the manufacturer.
Collection gauges should be placed one-fourth
the lateral line length from the main and no further
apart than one-fourth the wetted sprinkler radius or
effective sprinkler spacing. (For example, if the
effective spacing is 80 feet, spacing between gauges
f should be no more than 20 feet).
The grid pattern and number of gauges required
to complete the calibration depends on the pattern
of operating the irrigation system. The size of the
calibration area should be no less than the "effective"
area of one sprinkler. When sprix►lJers are arranged in
a rectangular or square pattern with proper overlap,
c an "effective area" receives flow from four sprinklers.
Thus, a minimum of four sprinklers should be
included in the calibration.
The reliability of the calibration generally im-
proves as more sprinklers are included in the calibra-
tion area. If all sprinklers contributing flow to the
calibration area are functioning correctly, it is neces-
sary to include only the minimum number of
sprinklers as described in the preceding paragraph.
But, a malfunctioning sprinkler can greatly influence
the calibration results. Its effect on the calibration
depends on the calibration setup and number of
sprinklers being calibrated, the malfunctioning
sprinkler's position within the calibration area, the
direction of the prevailing wind, and the nature of
the malfunction. For these reasons, it is extremely
important to observe the performance of every
sprinkler contributing to the calibration while the'
calibration is being performed and to record any
obvious performance irregularities. The more sprin-
tilers that can be included in the calibration, the
more representative the calibration results will be of
the entire field and the less influence one malfunc-
tioning sprinkler will have on the calibration results.
The volume (depth) collected during calibration
should be read as soon as a zone or sprinkler is shut
Off to minimize evaporation from the rain gauge.
Where a procedure must be performed more than
once, (Setups 3, 4, or 5 described below) containers
should be read and values recorded immediately after
each different set up.
Operating patterns affect collection container
layout and calibration procedures and results. Typical
}

i�
patterns for stationary
sprinklers include:
1. Square sprinkler spacing
L1
operated as a block (two or
more adjacent laterals
operating at the same time)
Figure I or Figure 2.
The calibration area may L2
CU
be positioned or centered 521
between the two laterals la
as shown in either Figure 1
or Figure 2. Four sprinklers
contribute flow to the L3
calibration area in the setup 531
shown in Figure 1, while six
�_ Calibration area io
sprinklers contribute for the lateral length from
setup shown in Figure 2. If
all sprinklers are function- Minimum
ing properly, similar results
would be obtained with
either setup.
In case 1, with no wind
effects, all four sprinklers
should contribute equal
flow to the calibration area
kl (provided all spriners are
functioning properly). If Ll S11
one of the four sprinklers is
functioning improperly, the
calibration results are not
biased by its position within
the calibration area. L2
nkl In case 2, six spriers
contribute flow to the 521
calibration area, but their
contribution is not equal.
SpriiW- ers Si, and S2,
contribute much more flow
to the calibration area than
sprinklers S11 S14 SM or 5
(The first number refers to
the lateral number and the
second number refers to the
sprinkler number along the
lateral.) The setup shown in
Figure 2 provides the advantage of more sprinklers
contributing to the calibration, but the disadvantage
of the results potentially being biased by sprinklers St,
and S,, if they are malfunctioning.
STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
16
Catch ca
512"f US13 f � S14 f 1 S15
522 t 523X S24_V S25
Lateral
spacinc
Catch can spacing Calibration area
sa
Sprinkler E32 S33 S34 S35
ted 1/4 riner
main Lateral line I� spacing —�I
calibration area = Sprinkler spacing x Lateral spacing
Figure 1. Layout of collection containers for calibration of a stationary sprinkler
system operated in a block design. in setup shown, four sprinklers contribute to
the calibration.
16
Catch cans i
S12 f A 513 1 1 S14 f } S15
52-2 S24 S25 ]'
Lateral
/ spacing
Catch can spacing Calibration area
S31 532 S33
Calibration area located 1/4
�"`� lateral length from main
/ 534 S35
Sprinkler --•�
Lateral line spacing
Figure 2. Collection container layout for calibration of a stationary sprinkler system
operated in a.block design. In setup shown, six sprinklers contribute to the
calibration.
For a square sprinkler spacing with collection
gauges set at one-fourth the distance of the sprinkler
spacing, the minimum number of collection gauges
required to perform the calibration is 16. Step-by-step
0

' Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
procedures for this pattern
are presented in the Case I S11 Lateral A S12
example on page 6.
2. One lateral operating at
a time with standard
overlap from adjacent
laterals — collection 752�lLateral
containers must be placed
on each side of the lateral,
Figure 3, which requires
twice as many collectors
(minimum 32). S31
A second alternative is
to perform the procedure
Calibration ar
twice, once on each side of lateral leng
the lateral using 16 contain-
ers at a time, Figure 4. When
selecting this alternative,
pay attention to changes in
operating conditions, such
as change in wind speed or
direction, that could result
in variability
In either alternative,
the amounts collected must
be combined to account for S11 Lateral A
overlap. Step-by-step
procedures for this calf bra-
tion pattern are presented
in the Case II example on
page 8.
Lateral 8
3. One lateral operating g S21
with no overlap between -
laterals — typical case when
large gun -type sprinklers are
operated in narrow fields, 531' Lateral C
Figure S.
Calibration procedure is E— Calibration area l
similar to procedure in 7#2 lateral length fro
except outer edges do not
receive overlap and must be
excluded from the effective
area calculations. Collection
gauges may be centered
about one sprinkler or
positioned between two adjacent sprinklers.
One of two approaches can be used to perform
this calibration. A general rule in irrigation design is
to assume that the iAidth of the effective area is
32 Catch cans
513 S14 S1 S
1 r50;:,:.09L013
Left half
30 7 0: '-,..;' 01.1 01
4 O i O$23 2 �16 S24 S25
iO=O'13
r`.' Lateral
O 50-`n,010.
-- Rintit ►�Alf -,' f spacing
th
S32 40y60S330i2.0..16 S34 S35
ea located 1/4 ^� Sprinkler
from main jj /// i spacing 1
Lateral line
Figure 3. Collection container layout for calibration of a stationary sprinkler system
with one lateral operating at a time. For setup shown, both sides of lateral are
calibrated in one operation.
S12 1 S13 S14 S15
10= O~-' 09`O13
2:0;:
,.. 10.014
30-.
'J L
4O 'BOP.;:012--016
S22
S23
16 Catch cans
S32 533
ocated '/4
m main
Lateral fine
S24 525
Lateral
spacing
S34 S35
Sprinkler
spacing
Figure 4. Collection container layout for calibration of a stationary sprinkler system
with one lateral operated at a time. For the setup shown, the procedure must be
performed twice, once for lateral A, once for lateral B.
between 50 to 65 percent of the wetted diameter of
the sprinkler (often 60 percent is used). The first
calibration approach accepts this design guideline
that the effective width of the lateral is 60 percent of
6-
l° l

Lateral A
Lateral
4\
SO;r
90 "I YL110 O 12
U1'O L42 Q L43 O `'r"O L44
L211 DSO'. .D12
L17 DL7 ZLi3 0
RI I UVI O RiT = O, RI4
DR23O:=J�. 4
Rai 0
.R3 '. -:0. R34
Field ditch
\ n
1
Effective width
60% of
wetted diameter
/ _�
Field ditch __J T
Field width
R41 O R420 R430.- O 544 �y
Figure 5. Collection container layout to calibrate a single lateral line with no overlap
from adjacent lateral. Either setup shown (lateral A or lateral B) may be used.
16 Catch Field ditch
cans L —
1 p p3:=p4
Gun 1 Gun 2 j 0` D 6' _0 $ Gun 3 Gun 4 Icffective width
►- z r�.' -
60% of
' -- 110.12 wetted diameter
d 13p'"r 16
C
i
s/. Lateral length Gun
E------- from main spacing
Figure 6. Collection container layout to calibrate a stationary gun system when each
gun is operated separately (not head to head).
the wetted diameter of one sprinkler. Sixteen gauges
are set out as shown in Figure 5 (Lateral A) (8 gauges
on each side of the lateral) with all 16 gauges posi-
tioned within the effective sprinkler width. The outer
edges are ignored at the onset of the calibration. Flow
from all sprinklers is summed then averaged to
STATION ;RY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
compute the average
application depth for the
effective area.
For the second alterna-
tive, the entire width of
the field is included in the
calibration as shown. in
Figure 5 (Lateral B). At least
16 gauges should be set
out on each side of the
lateral. The calibration can
be.perfgpned all at once
(both sides of the lateral
which, requires 32 gauges)
or the procedure can be
performed twice, once on
each side of the lateral
using 16 gauges at a time.
The "non -zero" volumes
collected are averaged to
get a "preliminary" average
application depth for the
wetted area. Next, the
Average application depth
for each row of gauges is
computed (rows are
assumed to be oriented
parallel to the lateral). In
this computation, zero
values are included. Those
rows whose row average is
less than one-half the
average from the entire
wetted area are then
excluded and assumed to
fall outside the effective
area. The effective width is
the distance from the
lateral line to the furthest
row from the lateral that is
retained. Step-by-step
procedures for this method
are given in the Case III
example on page 9.
4. Big gun sprinkler operating individually, Figure 6.
Procedure mLut be repeated for each gun sprinkler or
sprinter position (hydrant) contributing to the
effective area being calibrated. This operating situa-
tion results where one or two guns or big sprinklers
are moved from hydrant to hydrant throughout the
0

Field Calibration Procedures
,for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
field. Since stationary big guns should not be oper-
ated "head to head." (two or more sprinklers throw-
ing water on the same area simultaneously); the
procedure must be repeated several times.
Collection gauges may be centered about one gun
sprinkler. This setup requires that the procedure be
performed three times, once while Gun 2 operates,
again when Gun 3 operates, and a third time when
Gun 4 operates. Collection gauges may also be
centered between Gun 2 and 3 or Guns 3 and 4 as
shown in Figure 6. (Actual location depends on the
length of the lateral). In this setup, the procedure
i would be performed twice since only two guns or
gun locations contribute to the calibration.
CASE 1. Block Pattern with 2 or more laterals operating simultaneously:
(Scenarios shown in Figures 1 and 2).
—. - - -- -,
1.. Determine the effective sprinkler area. (Area defined by sprinkler spacing' alongya lateral multiplied by the
spacing between laterals. (Example: 80 feet by 80 feet are typical for a solid set wastewater system). The
effective sprinkler area is the minimum area to be in in the caiibration_area. Nate: The calibration:"
area can be more than the effective area of one sprinkler.
2: Determine he necessaryspacing between collection gauges (114 the sprinkler spacing).'For an effective.;-':• '
sprinkler spacing of 80 feet, the rain gauge spacing should not exceed 20 feet. (80 ft 14 = 20 ft). Ganges'
closest to the sprinklers should be placed a distance of 112 the gauge spacing from sprinkler. For a :
gauge spacing of 20 feet, the first row of gauges should be 10 feet from the fat line or'sprinklers:..'- =
3. Determine the number of gauges required. (Minimum number is 16.)
Calibration area (ft�
Number of gauges =
_ Gauge area (ft� y
Exampie­:'.-'- Calibrationarea ft l80 ft'x 80 - 6400 ft2
Gauge area-= 20 ft x 20 ft = 400 'ftz
Number of gauges - 16 gauges "f._
0
• ••fit_>.'n� .. _'.,:.-�, _•.-
1t Set out au -'es in a rectan 6 ular: ahem as shown in Figure 1 or 2 e uall s aced at the distance .� r
g 9. 9 P q Y_ p
determined in item 2 (20 feet)­i ithin the calibration area:
S. Operate the system for normal ope trng time for a full cycle: Record the time of operation (duration.in
6:r; lnimediately record the amounts collected in each gauge. (Refer to Warksheet No 1 for an example } -
.. - -
7. Add the amounts in 6 and divide by the number of gauges. This is the average application depth' x
zix tit
Sum of amounts collected in all gauges
Average application depth— - -
_ -•> Number of gauges `
Rd.
�} i

STATIONAPY
IR°ICA )ON SYSTEM
x• w}:
CASE I. con i u tn a -
_ st:.-
8' Calculate the deviationv"depth for each-gauge:.The deviation depth is thediference betweeneaC
_•:individual gauge value and,the'averagevalue of all gauges (#7). Record the'absplute value of each
deviation depth (absolute.valu,e:means the sign of the number (negative sign) is'dropped and all values
are treated as positive) Thesymbol for;absolute value is astraight'thin line. For example .�2j.means treat
the number-2'as an ab olute value it'does �ot.mean the number 127 Because this symbbl` cin�lead to•.
misunderstandings .it:is'not used .ivith:numbers in the worUieets at the end of this'publication::The
re{.4 ..� •, -ter •. �, •'YL - s
symbol is used in'fosmuWi6 the tent°'Ps y =
0

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
CASE 1!"."Single IaferaI operated at onetime but receives overlap from adjacent laterals
�- (Scenanos shown in Figures 3 and 4)
1 Detennrne the effective sprinkler area (Lateral spacing times spunkier spacingralong lateral): _
i Z De[ermirFe ttie-necessary:spacing Eietween collection gauges: (Lateral spacing divided .by_4),Gauges
closest to th_e spnnkiers should be plate d_a distance of one half the gauge spacing from the spnnkler
•_ t,� r
Determine the nurrsber of gauges regwred ` lsa '��� z• 4}' xi
„r '.0 Minimum number is 32 to`perforin theupracetlure iri_onesetu{i, Figure 3,-orb ,�r ~t :: _ -
ram. =s_ ' .•��.=Y=•`�: .>iV•2t �7,.':" "�• ___ �.sr- :r;-'a � - ` ='�:ti'. �. --. _ .. - a :..
�•; = -+���'-� --1 :fir _..r r _r.t ^" _ ..: ,zti'�.=:::+r=r
- �p�One`side of.laferal`calil�r`ated of a time' equires__1 gaugesr-procedOre�performed,ttwice firsts 4 y
operating Lateral A (Figure 4) thenrepeated'wrthout.movrng gauges anti operating'Lateral.B.
, _•L r � ri Y ` rc�} _ t -ram• rt c��^�'� Y t < x�- i.jsc�' rite�_�y z
-a ourit collected on one side of the lateral must be added to the amount collected from respe- ve Y
r- . ti� +rF - ....! ^ • 1-•i '`C --^_' - .. .,tR•r .:-x.:... „ , ti _ Y" : a? = w"- -.s ..-.r ..r „3 -u
positions o ttt e oth*r.side�.o_f.the;la feral�-;: Tni' is necessaryytoyaccount far dvedap fr6m adjacent litee'.-
`' �Ttieiefore,:callection gauges°should 6e labeled to rndicate.their.resp_ectrve posrbons;s'uch'as left or_nghtof'
- :y: -+ .,7=�-.,�-!^-...f. .r.(.rr•;_ ..r_:z�.`s � - r .C;�,s� �'a�r�.:. •b - �_"'+�r..._
_ .. •... _�= } .ate-'-'T"'v� _ � ,F-^ k iy r -v .r`• �. _�-a, c- � } t� �-
.•
1 S. Set out gauges ii a: rectangula_ pattern as shown in Figures3 or 4, equally spaced at the distance
- determined in Z
item 2--'•
5'"•-- __sr :Yi:T+'L �C✓-'.'c'''>-: 'r' r: •�: s• 3 ._•K-...�.l.i �=' ) Ztf�r _
6 Operate the`rystem.for.tiarmal operating time for a full cycle Record the time -'of operation (duration rn ,s
Koi.irs) yrY, f, =+L r-.r i -� .�.r. .�::=«:•i-r: _,{� y,.--,�a�� 3' r` s+, .}7 -�' :ti.+.
y'r
k• - fir. •_.ti: � r - � � '1 yam; - _�- r„ � ►;
.., ,4..rrM � .'rT' i__•w.., ;' ti - =- �•r. _y '�,.t�' :rib'' aa- r `;" 3 ti,'.l "` + -r _
F � 7 ImmearateI' reco'd-the. amo;"' collected in each gauge {Refer to Work Shiet Nb.:2 for'an example)
_ ; F onlyrone side'of:the latera! is calibrated at a�tirrie,: aftei4ecording:colEec ion'amounts;-empiY..°and fnove the
collection containers.fa-.the other:side arid.repeat Stepr5 through Tfor.akdy.tlie sarrre time duration as=__r
re`corded'in item 6�.r.-
_ �•i'r��^,�',-_•'Z+'�,,;,,_- •:�=�4•r�}-�� _ �- ti s" ,.�_ __'i�:.-.-•r...rT•^�`�r:fFir'-':.��r•.:._w�. ��r � �;::• �'._
•3; is :.; .:L.•.-•` r - �• '^_.:r" `� ^_ �:-� L?--�.
-~_�;� . _�,:�.rr � � �,_ -.� . ..� ._ •,::..-::ice'-� •'`^.�-c' _- c �-i�.?.'r=_:•<-_= `.rc�•'.,i.-•..
8 �Cailectiori amounts from•pairs of;caris should•be added tc simulate;overlajaWCanfenfs sFiould be combined
from,one side of the Eateraf to thee"other side as shown in Figure:3 Referring to Figure 3; container. L1-is':. T•";
comoinpd.to Ri, [1 to R2, L3 to R_3; L4 to R4;=L5 to RS; and soon
} J At y Y
._ f _ .-..,,L.s• � �-_ _ 1 L'�.=-••""�..+. ���-`t•_' +i l k l �•. - max;'' 1 T• -1 1�,,, �� '3' F �•- �' u } i-r +L -�
�, .• r rX�l _:�- �•t�`" .Y S'P f-T F~-2 r -r• -' ',!••y �- r> �-`���.-i-✓-`^ .-' -�'�.
9 Add the amounts from all containers and divide by th"ernuinber of gauges on aneside of tJieaateral "firs is �:-:
tlie`aveia roa'�`�lication de th inches
'.- 9 PP -- - P .- C_
Sum of arnountr`:coUectec! rn
r =� verage application'de ,oPth
- ...�. .. �.e^:y` -^ *',•.:4=" �?S!.si�: �' -ems _ *rr-'r '. -� r't"'� •.:�yr
=,� s ,= �~; Numbersof gauges.on one.side.of.Iateral,
-Y�`. ��.�, � f.'._ 4,._:``y" J ram..... •C._�I .. - Yam,_•.
r i +;�-yam..-.. 'x �.: f•fe^.; ;w r.-� �_: �_rS" .�=w�=-•.... �. rS*-.�Y - ^ i���. �,,,• ;� •ti
s - - � T �..: =-��",�, r ��.cEk-a''.'-:i.KrL';�"" 1•rtr +.�i',., ram.'= _'. = k'...::-y :� .�
10 Caiculafethe.deiTration depthforclgaugeThedevration.depth`.isthe:differerice between com�inedµl
r depth for each^position;{vai.ues:comp�ted:in 48) ancithe average apoiication depth (#9) Record the ,- --;:
absolute`val�ebf,each deviafio�n depth'Absoiute value.rneantlesignraf the numher_(negatnie�'sign) is :f
dropped and aILvaluesare treated as pasi4ve`The symbol for absolute value rs a thin straight
' r.� � ,''-"' r - ?�' ram` _ �" .."_ r' ' - - � r s �-.1.",��i . ��1., r • .. _ � r'. ' +{�-'.`]�. �-c ' - .._• �yc c_ „�
�; „T"'.a•C�'^T ��n.YSti''r- r�._R.r•
�DeviatJon depth = JDepth collected`at position i - aveiage applicaUori.:depthj - , -
�' :=�'.E-;.- _ _T'i`"i�"`'�•c � Taw. _.Y�; 3i'.`-r7.'.-.-"v:.�z. '- SS. ::= �-
"i" iefers to the gauge `position within tFie effectitve calibration area
;a 1.` Add amounts in ni l)-to etw'surnnof the:deviations .-from the average'.de' th a d divide by "the�n'u>nber of r'
9 P
Gauges (nurrib&_of gauges on one side of lateral) to get the average deviation'.d_eptta
- Y Sum of deviations (add amounts computed in �i0)
I
- Average deviation depth- ' ''.' .. '
- '-Numbei of side
_ oauges ori`one of Eaferai'
- - -
- - -7,";
.

STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
CASE 111. (Continued) V
6 Immediately record the amounts collected in each gauge {Refer to"Work Sheet No. 3 for an exarripie) lf.
only one; side, of the €ateral is calibrated at'aaime,' after recording "collection amounts; emp,ty and move the..::.":'
-• collection -containers to the -other side and repeat steps.4 through 6 for exactly the same time duration as
i recorded in items , • ' r y
7 Add the "non zero' amounts collected and divide by,the number of gauges with anon zero amount Fhis�
is the "preliminary;; ayengekappfication•depth (inches) within the ' -'wetted calib radon* area'.'-
' x t? of non zero amounts collected', { s
r 1 a-
e t ti r
l Average application depth ` _. .;_.
�• , , -'r `„ - a Y�..c r~ =e„_Mt,�t,- t.��r, rT - ` Number of non -zero gauge's yis.•, -= i t Z� mac- a 3L
f'r .y. }�.�TSi �-.] .-t`'.` '�� �.f s' _1.•. -;-��, k� 'ar � � t _ti�,, k.i+ •+;.y,•., �` - 7 v
r 8 Determine.t e,average application depth by rows Include zero catcries in the row corriputations
� ti -u_y- '„����-� h• "�^_ F ZHt r �r-,-T' - � �'.%:.+L� �,.�•rs-.- •-_��,i.}1 �Y, nz.a�� '
Sum of collection amounts fro:z_m all:gauges,on:the rowZ
"
'.-Average row ap kation depth
r ,� ..xY �' ntiyr=- •-•.s �r-•�-� ter ,. � x Number of row,gauges �)�„�-7,;-.-:c:�:
-Fti y i--X'h* ,i. •sr ��I- �"�*] i' _ .�'•"�si �aa.ti 4is -`^,L: _�: ti ^'.-re � -i
':I 1 rti Ga - •• N;4 - .:.^' ' ? ��:•� ~w - 1-+.: i R: `iL I ACY T\ •`
9 ldenti and delete those rows whose avers a ap li[ation de th'(; 8) is Ie_ss than one-half the relimina
f' - sue_ _ .ge P, . P _ --•. . _. � f?
average application depth (47
- •-. - .r - ` - - - 'tea-'ett 'ire
_ 10• Determine the effective applicat 6 width The boundary rs defined as the distance from the lateral to the
fast row ftii tliest from the lateral that is
- — ':4at',a' _=t.'�.�:5 v`�'•,'., .tit '[ ='y ^t::��. ,ii: �`^�.�1-•^..
_- - rt:.`-: ' = f i :1� :; :r.��C:.� f - S+ ` _ - :1: , t: •_^i !�; �4�l:: _=+'�•1 r
11 Determine the _average. application deptliwithin, e effective area Add amounts from all gauges in.rows
within the effective width Rows'retainedyin_#9 andjnl0) r =
rZ
Sum of amounts collected in rows'within effective width
Corrected average application
-^Number oivefguges wi thihe efect r '} w dth
. - 'Y ` - S.✓' y,:r'i, �S. ': _ .z- "r %• `' f, ' 'T•"�"".--fi- J..� - l� it - -
1Z Calculate the deviation, depth ford ach pauge.,The deviation depth is the dffferenceAcol�ected"in
usab€e gauge acid the average-app ication depth (#11) Record the absolute value` of eachdeviation depth
Absolute value`mean -the si n of the number neg ative si n rs dropped-arid'all ' lues-are.treated as
positive The rynibol for absolute value is a thin straight Ime:
Deviation depth `�DeptFi collected at position i' average application depth (4l.1)
sz �,
:ate',
i refers to the gauge position.within,the effective calibrad n area
t y' �t ?- - ',�, �y��*.•^ �•'v'ia:. w:r:P-x`.rra Y:'�� +�-.. A �i•. cam �r r'i.3" r.-
- `r -•i.,e �•'";-• rii,.-:* t"'-t-_�.rr"--."!4•':n•r I"
13 Add amounts in rr12 to get�'sum of ttie deviations' from the average depth and�divide by the number.
_rof ,C7aUge_5-%"- . �r -�•;V- -- t{ �^ - ...••s �,...: .`Y � f- -'f"' q�^,'F -,.,, •,r'�s, `�'-'r,!` e='�"'�.•.' `�.?Y T.�':
- 4 -.h + �.� �: �.- ... �.- = :tea r-7F..: �. a r�"'r•' ' ��
Sum of deviations (add amounts "computedn # i12),�
Average - x • »_ { , : . r�
Number of. ,gauges:withinj e eff ective width
14 Determine the application unrformity The a _plicatYon- uniformity is often computed using the Z,=r n>
.. mathematics€ formula referred:to as the Christiansen UnrformityCoef icient ft is computed -assfollows .
:. T ,~;,
�4verage application depth (#11} average deviation (n14)
Average depth (n l 1 } - ��
r
3 V ,
�r

CJ
STATIONAPY StPP,INKL =R
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
CASE I11. (continued)
75.Interpret the"calibration*results: the higF�erthe index value, the more uniforrri the application An. index of
i.. =:: •,: i 00 woulb neanthat the uniformity is perfect �- the exact amount'was collected in every gauge, ;- •::.'_: .'_.
An application uniformity greater than 75 is excellent for stationary, sprinklers
- "A-licatiori uniformity. betv+ieeri S0 to 75 is in the "goo ran a and is acce- table for wastewater
PP;. 9 g _ P _ -
_ --
-
application _
Generally,° an,appiicadon uniformity below 50 is not acceptable for wastewater_rmgatton -lf the tomputed
is less than 50, system adjustments are 'required. Contact your irrigation"dealer or Certified.Techi�i�al>
`.Speuallst for assistance:ti
S H E E 7�."1. Example 'calibration'tlata fora stationary sprinkler syst
4 pattern (Setup as shown in Figure i)
_ .4; i \ - Apt.'.':: •.:.-J- ^h ;" Ni �. _ � t
- a. Effective`spnnkIe''ire:a: 80 ;�fttby: 6400 ft.z
_ b.:-.Spacing between collection containers (spaang .80 (ft)/4) = 20 ft
�calibra 'on' r a 00 ft
Number of gauges ., 641
effective,gauae area (ft2) 20 ft x 20 ft T '
d Start of Irrigation -event 7 15 a m
e: End of Irri anon event-= . 9:30
f: Duration (e-d} 2.25 hours r
O rat a3ie st ~a dre
9= Pe . e .. _s3' .em. n ..a
Vaume. - - --- Deviation from :Volume,
- Gauge No_ Collected'--.--`- Yl Average' Gauge No Collected'= Averag
- (inches) ' x (absolute value) _ _ _ _ (inches},` {absolute i
{ L.y
s -.
4. 65 `' 075
6 _ �'_3$ _ 1927
5_
F, 8 64 - 065
` Record the absolute value of each deviation, so all values
.-..-._z.. .-.ate_-�--•��-r+�. �...�.r�.+:�__-�-r.�.��-�-.
are treated
-
,
6 86 4L 285
as positive. - - - --
33'

Ua
i'O�

a
STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
D

Xield Calibration Procedures
foi Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
D i
16

57ATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
WORK S H E E 3.(c6ntinued) '
D,stance =Volume Rowe _ - UsaEale Deviation
Gauge No, from Collected 'Average Values -from Average'
Lateral _... (inches)
_ _. s. _-i. _ _ _ _ ° +erg'_-t{.•.y1.'H•s:�.
77
Ll 2 1 a f bs ; i 69 f _180
_ .
L13 L 1 Q 83 z * " 83 32D
F-
L14' 10
x ; 421 3Q 61 ' 61 'u' %100
F �L22 - v 3 D t - - 57 .. G `f +�. `, ! _y $
.r• `.�c�-'t ti � y" '�.F�,�•x '-�' `.�.'rJ :.._ .�yt' '�..�' '4:ar
L24 3D 4 L, 4 53 s12
- _
t � - ..,�•
L31 50 " " r � .3 i:, �_ 2aD', `
1-32 50 _22 rp,' 22 ` R x- 290',::.x�, Yam,
L33 18
L34 56' ?5 29 r 220 f
S. ,"r ••x s;:�w~ 2' ... .'`• ` '� L' .� -i F �Y�-�.:J.� � � Tom- l•i��~
f: � 'r-•. v� a { ,, - � n �'`" l _ - -fir -� tt '�
p
' L44; r %D r; �1 D8 •�'. r_•--�! .DS {d �$Ca rd)'_ -," r^ `i.:`�"-�.r-��,r. -'sy'.k•.r •-h.
_ fiy-'i -_ i Y f7':'�._.i Y'�••L ._ii+JM� ..r�1:
I. '. ._ ._ _ - _ •.:+ - K f . .:z.- $ Lr. •� a �r��� fi�"`T4^-- u`.+y�--
R11 �.10 .67, ` - - rT.��% 67•'3 :.�'��1 =160 r
79
R13 $1 . 300';:�t rr t
10
_ R21.59 ,4. �:080
DQ(}„�s."'t
4 - ..{ f '' r"� A�tv« fir✓
R23 z s a 30' r
«�rL, � may., � •r rS 'y -� n i .^,sue �'� Y�-j •*-Stv •tis'=-�ts�'y •'=fir
R24 3Q,; 5 '-56 w �5Q xK,
R31 50 37 _ ti 37 " 140 17
R32 50 .17 > "' 17 t .. ? ; '40
R33 _ 'S0 .15 = 15��{ L360
:K
R34 _ 50 24 23 Z4 _ '" Z70
- -
-
r- -
R42_
�a
R43
70 - _
R44
- 70 - -- 09.
.04 (discard)

Field Calibration Procedures
for Animai Wastewater Application Equipment
Determine the average application de . pth"wit'hin"theeffective area. Add amounts fro'm­aIl"g_a"_u'c
3 inc es
0.
4511
V.
0.51 inc
-are nee
[�
!�

19
STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGAi ION SYSTEM
Irrigation System Calibration Data Sheet for Stationary Sprinkler
Date Farm Tract No.
a. Effective sprinkler area: Lateralzpacing ft by spacing along lateral ft =
Sprinkler: Make Model Nozzle Dia. Discharge . _ GPM
Pressure: Sprinkler Pump Pressure
b. Spacing between collection containers (sprinkler spacing (ft)/4) = ft
c. Number of collection containers
d. Start of Irrigation event
e. End of Irrigation event
f. Duration (e-d) _ hours
O Prate the stem collect data and
'0
50
'0
'0
01010
=
�Zo
z0
60
'0
�'0
'0
1 0
1 0
0
30
'01,0
,0
,0
Z0
1 C)
I "o
.0
1°0
12 101,0
:0
24
10
12110
1'0
V. P sY ,
record on the worksheet on page 1 S.
h. Sum of all catches inches
i. Average application depth (h/c) inches
(i)
j. Precipitation rate inches/hr
(� T
k. Sum of all deviations from the average catch
1. Average deviation from average application depth
m. Uniformity coefficient
(i)
Interpret the calibration results. Y::
An application uniformity greater than
75 is excellent for stationary sprinklers.
Application uniformity between 50 to
75 is in the "good" range and is
acceptable for wastewater application.
Generally, an application uniformity
below 50 is not acceptable for waste-
water irrigation. If the computed U, is
less than 50 percent, system adjustment
are required. Contact your irrigation
dealer or Certified Technical Specialist
for assistance.
(1) -
- X 100 =
ft2
0
Wind direction
Wind speed
0
50
90
130
0
Z0
0
20
20
60
10
1400
118
220
Z0..
30
30
70
10
70
70
20
0 2
30
40
80
720
16y
20_
z40 20
320
11

Fjeld Calibration Procedures
for Animal Wastewater Application Equipment
0
s

STATIONARY SPRINKLER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
�e
1
0
5
0
9
0
13
0
17
0
21
0
25
0
29
0
2
0
6
0
10
0
14
0
18
0
22
0
26
00
30
3
0.
7
0..0
11
15
0
19
0-
23
0
27
0
31
.0
4
0
8
0
12
0
16
0
20
0
24
0
28
0
32
0
0
NOTE: While in the field, it may be less confusing to
..x!, record measured values in the avid above, then
transfer these values to the data sheet for
calculation and interpretation.

w
Prepared by
R.O. Evans, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Extension Specialist
J.0 Barker, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Extension Specialist
/. T. 5mith, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Extension Assistant Specioiisl
R.E. Sheffield, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Extension Specialist
5,000 copies of this public document were printed at a cost of S3,084, or 5.62 per copy.
Published by
NORTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE
Distributed in furtherance of the Ans of Congress of May S and June 30, 1914. Employment and program opportunities are offered to all i
people regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. North Carolina State University, North Carolina A&T State University, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, and local governments cooperating.
4/97-5M—JMG/KEL-270200 AG-553-1
E97-30397

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. -Stevens, Director
Craig Perry
Perry Hog Farm
890 Bynum's Bridge Rd.
Scotland Neck NC 27874
Dear Craig Perry:
1 lkf?W,A •
AV
AM
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
D b 30 1999
I f� '-
5
ecem er ,
4 1 , IR
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number'42--71
Halifax-Gounty�
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. UR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLDI , and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper

10:
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 19, 1999
Perry Hog Farm
890 Bynum's Bridge Rd.
Scotland Neck NC 27874
Attn: Craig Perry
NCDEN-'R
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS420007
Perry Hog Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Halifax County
Dear Craig Perry:
In accordance with your application received on March 15, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Craig Perry, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000: This
approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of
animal waste from the Perry Hog Farm, located in Halifax County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than 4000 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP).
I
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone] `r
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Yak.
Certificate of Coverage AWS420007
Perry Hog Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Dianne Thomas at [phone] ext. 364.
Sincerely,
�..
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Halifax County Health Department
Raleigh Regional 'Office, Water Quality Section
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

.r
s-F
R E 0i'd
CF-IVF-ID r%,
74"
----- --------- -- --------------
C.7

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
January 15, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
_RETURN RE EIPT REQUESTED
Craig Perry
Perry Hog Farm
Route 1, Box 431
Scotland Neck NC 27874
Farm Number: 42 - 7
Dear Craig, Petry:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
II�A�!� r't�� ti c� • � �7
tyon•Oi�har9° Pemlytlin9
You are hereby notified that Perry Hog Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply
for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm
has six 60 day s to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 676 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or
operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT
OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned
within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at [phone]
extension 364 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
for
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely
' 7
f`
A.X—WoW_Mward, Jr., P. .
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Perry Hog Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name:
1.3 Mailing addres ' _ x elr-y7952
City, State: Scotland Neck NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 826-4766
1.4 County where facility is located: Halifax
Zip: 27874
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): SR 1003 5 milesW. of Scotland Neck
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): _Gordon
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Carroll's Foods Of Va Inc
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/70
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _42(county number); 7� (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description_ : Swine operation
7eeder to Finish
4000- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Dairy
0 Beef
No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 42 - 7

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 35.00 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 35.00
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES o Q please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES r NO ( lease circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NR S andards, etc.) (Swine Only)
r NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?�;,ES
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? 5 ��
_f-
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
�3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied; IQ
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
�3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
✓3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
✓3.3A The soil series present on every land application field.
3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
:14-3.10 A site schematic.
3. ] 1 Emergency Action Plan.
33.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
✓
�3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
✓3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications--'
that may be applicable to your facility.
✓3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
Ifyour CA WMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-GE 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 42 - 7

Facility Number: 42 - 7
Facility Name: Perry Hog Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
RECEIVED
VATFR Of 141 iT" Gl=t^ P10N
5 1199
Non -Discharge Permitting
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
O
this application for /2 % _ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the ~best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to rp-ps incom�lee .
Signature
Date — /O - �i
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
1, 4O��r�+'1 ` �� (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for !7f-Z — % (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returne j as incggtplete. K
Signature
Date 3 - /
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKA CJJE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 42 - 7

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (08)
AsbevWe Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 29901
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cberokee
Polk
Ciey
JL%ut -cf
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax (910) 48"707
Anson
Moore
Bladen
Richmond
Cumberland
Robeson
Harnett
Sampson
Hoke
Scotland
Montgomery
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamaace Rockingham
Allegheny Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie Lenoir
Cbowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
C%crituck
P-M—Wimws
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alexander Lincoln
Cabarrus Mecldenburg
Catawba Rowan
Cleveland Stanly
Gaston Union
hedell
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
38M Barren Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
EdgwA=be
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warner
Lee
Wilson
Wilmington Region WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive-Fatteosion
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
cinc iet Onglow
Columbus Prader
Dupun
FORM: AWO-G-E S/28/98 Page 4 of 4

11
1
Animal 'Waste Management Plan Certification
ipleaae tvee or print all in(orm:uion dint does rim require a si'inatu%i
E.'tistin!Z or Netts or " ' Expanded (Plea' se circle one)
a
Name of Farm: Facility No: 5�2 - 7
Owner(s) Name: K 'r Phone No:
Mailing .address: '_Sro Alee
in -
Farm Location: �i� O-s����3 Count,; Farm is located in:
Latitude and Longitude: 3t� i0 ZS / 77 Z9 9 Integrator:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with floc aiion identified and describe bela«- (Be Sp e: itic: road
names, directions, milepost. e:c.):
Operation Desceiation:
Ispe of Swine No. of Animals
:1 Wean to Feeder
weeder to Finish Og
J Farrow to Wean
Z) Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
* Gins
J Boars
Type of Poultry
D Layer
D Pullets
No. of Animals
Other Type of Livestock:.
Type of Carrie
Z) Dairy
:) Serf
IVo. of.Aninrals
Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: •y w G , Required A-reage: G �f.% '44"7 �S� -
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds : , Total Capacity: L-28.3G Cubic Feet (0)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or c 10 (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
*il lh q. i��MMfr.i.M..N lk f4�h lM ijt 111 �i.IK+MW.Ie.i.keX. rr �aMHM[WMi,Y�i.iYl!..4•!. yarilh M'iNR+�R*µi. ijt lM��+i�+M.k+MiR#ii.si►l iR M.ir,. aa ai .h lF #+i�.MF !. li�i. ja Ye Msa
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (Wd) Verify drat all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changim,. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage systent or construction of new facilities will require a new cettiticadun to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that [here must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application System to surface waters of the state eidler directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 23-year, '--l-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Con;ervadun Service. The appruved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (eye) know drat any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DELI or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 6o days of a title =s(
Name of Land Owner : Q 2"'/
Signature: ate:_
Name of Man . er('f ifleren f m vner):
Signature: -- Date:_ 9— i9z ^
ti

Technical Specialist Certification
_'I,
�. As a technical specialist designated by the forth Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 1i�
NCAC 6F .00D3. I certifv that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal oust
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and speCiticntions of the Division of Environmental N'lanagemen,
(DE.Iv) as specified in IjA NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -.Natural Resources Conservation Service (INRCS) andlur the
Forth Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 13A NCAC 2H.O217 and 15A VCAC 6F .0001.
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI. WUP. RC. I). the technical specialist should only certify parts for which then are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
) Collection. Storage. Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
J Fxi tine facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requiremems.
—Zvew ex ended cx retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste sturage and treaunent swuctures. such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specirications.
r /
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): r?�i�� o� 7
Affiliation f I� / C'S Date Wort: Completed:_
Address (Agenc
Sienature:- V,
I No.: 47/ 9 -:5
B) Land A lication Site (WUP)
The Ian provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rues.
27
Name of Tech727;
aiist (Please Print): - -
Affiliation �����
Affiliation 'V-•PC I Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency f,�12 E/ E'Pr9G yL G - C � 7 3 9 Phone ;No.: _ 9/
Signature: Date: /
C) Runoff ontrols frt
Check- rlte q propriare box
is
3""'Fscility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
J Facility with exterior lots (RC}
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and Heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by -Ni2CS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ✓' 2 zz✓-Q G►d� �^
�1Ile
CF _ Date Work Completed:
Adciress lAgencE� o c / �� •vC 2 ��.�9 Phone yo.: 919�Sc�3
Si_nature: d r r Dale:
i t'r" .. I ......� l 1 na

men
pfile approprinre bo.r
�xiitiiz� nr e crindin;_f lcslity with exislina w�Sl�tr+Dlic�1{nit ell�iL'nl S 0VUP or lj
Animal waste application equipment specitied in the plan has been tidier field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design chars and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specitied hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of applications has been
established: required buffers •can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are c.;n=ned as part of
the plan).
J mow. :xDi1i ed, nr exis[in; factlln' withotrt 2.clzlist� uwaste aoy�tS ((toll �cQ l sm�ns tnr_�nCt�' ims t[ian. (I)
Animal waste application eouiptnent specified in the plant has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing. of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adiustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
w. exainded,or •cisti o fncili �• wi i. 'na w, li [inn ea n n tier It roinz-ao ins
irrigation, (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specitied in rite plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommbdate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as pert of the plan). 1 , I
vame,of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation ' J Z,,-� Z I-?' Al 6?.S
Address (Agency).
SiQnature:�
E) Odor
v v[
_Date Work Completed:
278.7i Phone No.: 919 S
-�
)_��3' —�'>
Plan
. WUP. RC or I?
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist. a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to `linimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
N-fortality Nlanagetnem Plan and the Emergency .action Plan are ,complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ % Y�0 _5/0,- ^
Aifili'adon 6-S 14
Address (Agency): � � 1,)6 , 'R .ds
Signature: ,�
Y
rt Swine Fa
C
ate
Work Completed:
P Phone No.: 919
—Date:.
The roIIo%ina,3i"gftturxbIock is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that bey onstruction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was efure June 21. 1996, when was it ennstructed o
expanded
! (we) certify that l (we) have attempted to conta certified mail Joining property owners and all property owners
wbo own property located across a public road. street. or from this ne•.V or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of 14CGS 106-80- copy a notice and a list of the property owners notified is
atmc:lted.
Narne of Land Owner:
Si -nature:
`iamN of tila yer li[ dittere tt srom
Si;na e:
�14`C Au',ust 1. 1.1`17 :
Date:
Dote:

III. Certification of Installation
A).Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
New. exnanded or retrotil[ed facility (SO
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no cerriftcation is necessary.
Name of Technic:-' Specialist (Please Print):
Atliliation_Us,��
Address (Agency
Signature:
Date Work Completed:
2;;'
Phone No.:-
B) Land A Hcation Site (NVUP)
Check rlre ppropriate box
e croppina.system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
_J Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilizadoh plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/daylpear), the proposed corer crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteudlizadon plan.
't Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 dad
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation r� W t" F Date Wort` Completed:
Address (Agency):`- v E �G GAG/�r4 c 27 .?9 Phone No.: 919 :_:5_Zt?
Signature: / Date: Z ePm=
ly
his followin signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in
abov ben checked.
[ (we}certify that I (eve) ha mmiued to establish the cropping system as specified in my (o vaste utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish the ififtailm crop for erosion control. and will submit to DE` erificatioa of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calf days following the dale specified in th onditional certification. [ (we)
realize chat failure to submit this verification is a on of the waste managed t plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DE`1. /
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from o
Si -nature:
te:
Date:

�r
Controls from Exterior Lots (RC) 1 r
• r;tv.tiith_e.ctt:rior it�t5 - � ✓jgox'�3� SGO:�e O/}/�1/ye_ �J$��
+�Ictl��xti to minimize the run off of pollutants front lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the Plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
:. 12me of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Acency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
D) Agolication and Handlina E ui meet Installation (WUP or I)
Check thcjpprophare Nock
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready .For use:
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and arc contained as part of the plan.
J Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan lim not been in;called but [he owner
ha; proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with•U1e requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and
adjustnIettt guidance have been provided to the owners and :ere contained as part of the Flan.
:3 Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment speci d in e
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/y
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste c e land a pied
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):— EV k � �0 1 C p
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency) .f sk, NC IW67-GV YPhone Rio.:_`9/9-7-b �7a�
Signature: Date: 7
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approvri�
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the anneal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste managemene plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and wits subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (it different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. InsectControland -Mortallty Slanneement D. St. NvUP. RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. Tha
mortitlicy management system as specified in the Plaza has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ",/� �U�� n ���
Affiliadon v-fJ,q��'-� Date Work Completed:
E r9L G G �5�'�c = S� ✓
Address (Agency)- .�a 27d,39 Phone No.:
Signature:�-- _ - -__---Date:
A%VC -- Auliust/1. 1997

z) i -
[Tj�iJ'
. ... -
•
.
�
�.='`e• ..�_---... � f:-_.... ....... Imo,.`,
-
- -•
ace 1uS 4 r
�' -
�•
r•:
nFO^_
J.l1L
7LLA
sw.•o KMA�� LlLUZ
e
Py 141
pe.,,el, fr • t� $ ;. `,fig 'Jt •`
uo.•�a, ti ,�I ,,
It
to
•
? Ila
lJ.91 t7 17 A A �r
UM
r Dln. Sror. hl
Ile COTLAND MECK
J= ' Mr. 2,434
J-lu ?.�
I .L1R1
4 ' iLe 11 o7y • flo!
IF02
• � II
RZ
JAU
Un
` Ra.wwaMl
i S IL ?
im
JIM
I / y
f
I y
~ F7
`O
o 10
Im 1!ffi
1
.p
ca,Iallol,. �.
:.I
ti
1l4i
Rrollr.R!
•!
Aq
ALPAYRA
27
'I
tit ro
µ
�
/
I'v
lim
r
JI L
Iltf
h •
t�i �4
JML us
Im
j
's MO.caou/
AS
���
1111,
!!1 F
J
12Q4.—!]hR IIRQ.-11•
' IMF r
/
IIxI
♦�
KEY TO COUK" ROAD Mllr+BM
na . nn . IIM
A%
1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understandland will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: CRAIG PERRY
(Please print)
Signature:
Name of Manager f difAerent from owner):
Signature:
Date. �o�'�_/� .,/
-�
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)John Y Clark
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-583-3481
Address (Agency): Post office Box 8
Halifax NC
Signature:'
27839-10(108
v
oe«, _�f
pace: 11

USDA United States Natural Halifax County Agricultural Center
Department of Resources Post office Box 8
�~ Agriculture Conservation Halifax, N.C. 27839-0008
Service (PH)252-583-3481 (FAX)252-583-1814
June 17' 1999 ro�rndYun3
Nc^,-fliscY:4r� .
Dianne Thomas c
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
NCDENR
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Dear Dianne,
We have revised Mr. Craig Perry's WUP (# 420007) as requested in your letter.
Items 24 and 25 have been added to the original required specifications on page 10. See
attached sheets and new updated waste utilization plan agreement sheet.
Sincerely,
J Wayne Short V
istrict Conservati nist
JWS:pb

1
2 2 f99?
Non•Dlsc,��rge ���r,; un
9
June 21,1999
4
Dianne Thomas
Non -Discharging Permitting Unit
NCDENR
P.Q. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535
Dear Mrs. Thomas,
Enclosed is the information requested concerning
Mr. Craig Perry swine operation #420007 I hope that this
is satisfactory to what you needed. If for some reason this
is not what you need please feel free to contact our office.
Thanks for working with our office and our farmers through
this on going process.
�/erome
rely,
Evans
Resource Conservation Specialist.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a 'closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
c
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage .(pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
24.E The smaller of the old lagoons -has been converted -and upgraded
SJ'��to a gravity flow catch basin from the houses, where the waste
will be concentrated and pumped over into the new lagoon.
25:-The large old lagoon will be closed out to meet NRCS lagoon
losure specifications by the year 2001 as required by the
Halifax County Livestock Ordinance.
Page: 10

<LAG 0;N-EL0-SURE-=PLA N
NAME:Craig Perry LOCATION:SR.1003 5 miles W. of
Scotland Neck.
PHONE:[phone]
COUNTY:Halifax TRACT:3633
LAT . /LONG .: c 9
7 7 O /I
HU NUMBER: ^ --0 DATE;12/31/97
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Phone Number: 919-946-6481
Plan Prepared By: Bill Ewers, Resource Conservation Specialist
Natural Resources Conservation Service
919-583-3481
See attached waste analysis report dated:12/31/97
NOTE: NRCS or SWCD personnel must be onsite while lagoon is
being closed for them to certify the closure of the storage
facility.
GENERAL INFORMATION: The lagoon was constructed in the late
1970's as the storage facility for a 4000 head feeder to finish
operation. The lagoon was constructed in a high water table
soil. Agitation and pumping are the best means of removing the
waste from the facility.
VOLUME TO BE REMOVED: The lagoon is 600 feet long and 70 feet
wide at normal water level. The facility is an average depth of
10.5 feet from bottom to normal water level. Total volume of
waste (solids and liquids) to be removed is 2,757,696 gallons.
LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE: When the lagoon is closed wastes will
be applied to corn, cotton, and wheat. waste will be applied at
0.35 inches per hour with a maximum application rate of 1.0
inches per acre per irrigation.
SPECIFICATIONS: The storage facility will be agitated with a PTO
driven agitator/pump for a sufficient time to mix the solids and
liquid into a slurry. The lagoon will need to be agitated from
at least four locations. Waste will be applied in a manner not
to exceed the hydraulic loading capacity of the soil and not to
exceed the crop nitrogen requirement as shown below.
SPECIFICATIONS (cont .j: Side slopes will be washed down during
pumping. The slurry will be pumped until less than 12 inches of
the slurry remains. All sludge will be removed that is
reasonable and practical based upon a visual inspection by the
certifying technical specialist.

LAGOON CLOSURE PLAN
Closure of this operation must be done without a runoff of the
effluent. Do not land apply while it is raining or when the
ground is frozen or saturated. Avoid applying waste prior to a
predicted rainfall.
All areas disturbed during the closure will be vegetated
according to NRCS standards and specifications.
Transfer pipes from swine houses will be removed prior to
certification. If the facility is to be maintained as a fresh
water pond, a pipe for controlling water level and a spillway
must be installed. Otherwise the dike must be breached.
WASTE ANALYSIS: 6.6 LBS PAN/1000 gallons X 460 = 3036 lbs. N
6.6 LBS PAN/1000 gallons X 2,298 = 15,167 lbs. 0
Field
#
Crop
Realistic
Yields
Nitrogen
Per Acre
Acres
Req.
Application
Rate
(In./Hr.)
Application
Amount
(Inches for
PAN Appl.)
All jCorn
1
110
138 1
132
0.35
1 1.0
All jCotton
1
650
78 1
233
0.35
1.0
All lWheat
1
55
132 1
138 1
0.35
1.0
Either of the 3 crops shown, with their total acres required, may
be used to close the lagoon individually. Any combination of
the above crops may be used also, with their acres reduced
according to their percentage of the total acres planted.
*This lagoon will have to be closed down in a two year period
due to lack of needed acres on Tract 3633*
Soil Type(s)lGritney,Exum, Emporia
NOTE: Because of hydraulic loading, it will be better to use
additional acres rather than pumping on the same acreage for
several days back to back.
AGREEMENT: I agree to close this lagoon according to the above
plan that meets NRCS standards. I will notify the Division of
Water Quality 24 hours before this closure is started. If cost
share dollars are involved, I agree that no animals will be
stocked for five years. J
4 .
Owner:
Date:

I
'16
kN,
4r'

UTILIZATION
producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
CRAIG PERRY
RT I BOX 431
SCOTLAND NECK NC 27874
919-826-4766
Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
4000.00 hogs
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the -waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1
raga: S ff

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
4000 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 7600 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
40.00—hogs--x--2-3- lbs• =PAN/hogs/year 920.0 _lbs :_-PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
�T� Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
--------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
34
METH
N
TIME
801.8
5489
GtB
FH
3.8
190
0
4.22
T
SEP-MAY
5489
32
ExA
FH
T
4.3
1
1215
0
110.4512246.75
SEPT-MAY
5489
35
ExA
BH
I
6.5
1
325
0
120.8716782.75
MAR-OCT
5489
"35
jExA
SG
I
29
1
49.3
1
0
120.8711028.89
NOV-APR
5489
37
GtC
FH
I
3.8
I
1190
0
11.G
1304
SEPT-MAY
FEND
TOTALI11164.1
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL10
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N.(animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial. nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
FH
TALL FESCUE -HAY
TONS
50
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
1.7
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
37.14
11164.19
0
0
37.14
11164.19
* BALANCE
-1964.191
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 5
cnyes: r I

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1480 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 7400
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 24.6666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 59.2 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content,.soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 6

y► ;gyp ' + � � �''!fµ ��.-•/ . , .` �f l • ir'�� ' y � �' -� 4; !d,�-.
i'�_ R�'
t.'f.�r' {}�.,' r ..'#14.. �� �aS �'17 r �r �'�, tr • • ,-'3
1 -+7
�� � 1 ti y:. l• � •7s r''
�1 ,.: '�w �' 1 rn �,:�' f14''_,..,.�-��-�iiA � •arm..(" �.Y• i��k �.�.i lt+� .Cr.
i` 1 l rx�rL-1,J� � t � ��-.�- ���yr ,S:y,� �ti.,• .C, t1
fit„ .4�k' •+i i y� 1�!. 1'� 1.ls�I� %�• '•ai►.r��:+ t; •r 7°1' �.�5� � �'�'���}�}'� r
� •�;�� 11J I , •{/r i �`� �*'� q� � • y.+ , ice`' r+ �'�� �i� � „ %.
r
,` � '.�r/fir �. , ' �� `l.•r•,` ../+�i�y�s`,• y' •3 j,✓yl"t> Y ��' ''�•{;-i�r,.1
4F re
4,WiM4. r �� ��r' •.yam• •;�,�,t• •. ,,,y► , � � ;.-• -�
yyjt� + � 9a , } ,%s•"iiis _„• ' rv.,�• • "!. : � ,✓' :'.p , .fix L
�,
t " / a�� ISIlsr�,-�"'/.�'`j+t, `�.[� `� > �'' , l W . i"� �A• /� I ` j D - `�1.1� � rI , J� �1 � "'
stcn- 5 � _ ..' .yam- nz r— c: •,_
��" y � i� '�T�r1'e} '� •b �C Op .(�1 � � l� �;, •^r'�•Y YnJ Z S �. k
i, T\, yllMr �� ��"�`` '' � � �• Lt1 ' � ( \r .h �[ ��� `- *" � wtj
Mo
' �'1• r3r .� ' \ Ft '!r'` ,R , t:-"t aq „p MO
Q
+ ,•� r� ,trk tl .r i � �
kV
ek
TV Of
t ♦� �+ fs i��t; . k'� `ray
y{� M xLed AT is
,< Y�• r
yi( Jl�
xo
.�•� :.+� ra � ry:.µir r• '�� is r�* ; '� d. ,.�t_1.�

ANIMAL, WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
5489
32
ExA
FH
0.35
*1.0
5489
34
GtB
FH
0.35
*1.0
5489
35
ExA
BH
0.35
*1.0
5489
37
GtC
FH
0.35
*1.0
5489
-35
ExA
SG
0.35
*1.0
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
�. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application.- Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking.
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than -
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 9

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage .(pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume -for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 10

EATER GEN CY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NZJyLBERS
DWQ 9,19—s71— ¢700
EMERGENCY hf.ANAGE.�:v-T SYSTEI+1 i - 83 ` 2031
SWCD 919 —S8k3 — 3¢B1
N-RCS 1
T'nis plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking*
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
le2ve your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen: This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
I. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this mayor may, not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are -listed.beFow.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. CaIl a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is enterina lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close aloes to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems. houses. solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. \lake sure no ilphon ocau;s.
J. Stop -,[I IIU��.'. in ilie house. flush _� �temS. or solid separators.
rl:. ,•111,.,- I : : .;C A

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dia a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch ail seepage.
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with'a.clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach anv surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Anv damage noted, such as employee injury. fish kills. or property darnaze?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
a. Are potable water wells in dander (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office: Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-39,12.
Your phone call should include: your name. facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill. weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
C. Instruct E:ViS to contact local Health Department.
d_ Contact CES. phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number -
and local MRCS office for adviceftechnical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works tali 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to becin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
December 18. 1996

6: Contact the technical specialist who cerified the lagoon ( RCS, Consulting
Engineer. etc,)
a. i\ame: W 'xl"erf
b. Phone: 9/ —S ,3 —,3 /
7: Implement procedures as advised by DW'Q and technical assistance agencies to
re:tif- the damage, repair the s} stem, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.

1-Iortality Management N•Iethods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowing
stream or public body of water.
Q Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
Z Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, piacina in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of AgricuIture
:! Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
- - - -- - ... .--.....- -- -
tiuurcr Cause IIMPS to Control Insects Sile Specific Praclices
_ _ Lhlatid Systems
i- Iluli ( 3illteis Accumulation of solids il Flush system is designed and operated
sufticiemly to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed.
❑ Itcinove bridging of aecumtilalcll solids ;it
digharge
i. %0MIs Uuul fits Ciilsted Solids Maintuin lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparcut to nninimize Ilse
c twing of solids to a depth of no more ilian G -
iachcs over more than 30% of surface.
I:>,cCS:'iye Vrl;cl;dive • DecuYuig vegclaliall Of Maintain vegetative control along banks cif
1 �iue�'11t lagoons and other ilnpoun(late nis to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
aloag walees ctlgc on hupommdmenl's perimeler.
• Deed Spillage
Dry Systems
11 Design. operate and maintain feel sysients (e:.g.'
bunkers and troughs) to ininiasize the
lacctuttttlatitin of decaying wltstage.
v Clcan tip spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day itilcrval during staiuuer; 15-30 day interval
-- f during winter). --
Iced ShlraLc Accumulations of feed residues tip Reduce moisture ucctiautlation within and
around iinnicdiate perimeter of 1ecd slur ge:
ure as by insuring drainagc away front site
aluvoi providing adetlputc Coil linnlltcill (e_g.,
covered bin f+u brewer's grain wid similar high
moisitire: grain products).
Inspect for atul resmovc or break up-accimmdawd
solills in filter strips annual feed suir ge us
needed.
AI.IIf' - II--v,-"11 t I t' t'I,Ih t',iI'e; I

Suurrc Cause
Animal 1 Inlrling Areas • Accumulations oranitnal waslcs t3
and feel wastage
n
flry Al;,nur4 1 LuullinG Accumulations orauintai wastes n
Systems
n
Cl
I1MPs to Coutrial Insects. Site Specific Praclict
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along;
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by aniuuals is .
Mainlaln f ' to itnd Gllcr strips arnnnd
Uninial liolcling ire- lo,m, mai ize
ace Jiiiul tiaras of wastes {i.e., inspect rcu and
realove or break up accumulated solids as
ncedcdj.
Renove spillage on a routines basis (e.g., 7 - 10
clay .Inlerval- during summer, 15-30 day Interval
daring winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.. ..
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
slockpiles.
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulate!
wastes In filter strips around sinckpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For more inl'ontm on comact the Cooperative Extctusiort Service, Department orentouiningy, Rox 7613, Morlh Carolina Slalc l luiversity,
l( aleir,la, NC. 27691-7613.
At,I1t: :udhcr 11. 1996, higc3

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
SuIIrce Cause IIMI's to Minitnize (Odor Si(c specific I'ra
I ,uuutcatl Swllte prt)(IIIclioll d Vegetative or wooded buffers;
G� Recommended best managenlenf practices;
Good judgment and common sense
At,imal body surfaces • Dirty manure -covered animals Cl pry floors
11t1ttr sullaces 0 Wct Immure -covered floors Cl Smiled floors;
lc� Waterers located over slolled floors;
CI Feeders at high end of solid floors;
C� Scrape manure buildup from floors;
L� nderfloor ventilation for drying
NLuuu1: c1,11cCIL'orl I,ils
a Ilrine;
_
Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
• I'artial microbial decomposition
or scrape;
fi,
Underfloor ventilation
Vcmil.,tit,n cxhausl lduu
• Volatile gases;
fif/
Karl III aintellalice;
Dust
i7
Efficient air movement
Iu111mr furf:,ccs
I)usl
[I
Washdown between groups of animals;
17
Deed additives;
0
Feeder covers;
Cl
Feed delivery downspoul extenders to feeder
covers
I Iush 1,11I1,s
Agilatiun of recycled lagoon
Cl
Flush lank covers;
hiluid while Tanks are filling
❑
Iixlell(I fill lines to near hollatn of tanks with
/alili-siphon
vel)Is
I lush :,llc� s
Agitation during waslewater
C3
Uurferflnnr flush will► tlntlcrlit)or veulilalinn
conveyance
Pil ICLI1.111;c lulinls
0 Agitation of recycled lagoon
n
Extend recharge lines to near h(1uurlt 01'1)its
liquid while pits are lilliug
with anIl-slpholl vellls
111-1 stalituls
a Agitation during su11)1) taltk
Cl
Sump Junk covers
filling and drawdown
()nliitll; drlill collection
• Agilation during waslewaler
F]
Dox covers
ur junclitln btlxes
conveyance
AN1t I('-'t,'MAIIl,er 11. 1996. Page 3

Source Cause [IMPS to Minimi-ze Odor Site Specific Pruclices
Fill] of drainpipes al 0 Agitation during wastewater O Exlend discharge point of pipes unrlcnreath
lagoon conveyance / lagoon liquid level
1.:,61j+nr surfaces 0 Volatile gas emissions; Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• fiological mixing; Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
. Ninimum agitation when.pumping;
O Mechanical aeration;
Cl Proven biological additives
leripliun sprilikler 6 1 Iigh pressure agilalion; :11,
rrigale on dry days with little or no wind;
I""`I" Wind drift
inimum recommended operating pressure;
mp intake near lagoon liquid surface;
from second -stage lagoon
Swr;i e t:u,k ur I,;,sin • Partial microbial decomposition; 0 llottout or midlevel loading;
0 Mixing while filling;
O Tank covers;
• Agitation when emptying Cl Basin surface mals of solids;
Cl Proven biological additives or oxidants
sctiliog I,,rsio surface 0 Partial ntien►hial decomposilion; Cl Extend drainpipe outlets trndernealb liquid
• Mixing while filling; level;
• Agitation when emptying C1 Remove settled solids regularly
NI.murc, slurry w sludge e Agilaliott when spreading; C7 Soil injection ofsittrry/sludges;
sprc,,,lcr owlets Volatile gas emissions 0. Wash residual manure front spreader after use;
Cl Proven biological additives or oxidants
I lncoverell manirre, Volatile gas emissions while 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
shnry or sItidge on fichl drying C7 Soil incorporation %vilhin 48 firs.;
Sill lae:,:s
0 Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
l)�a�t :uinnal �li,pusal
• Carcass dticomposilinn
11 /Proven biological additives or oxielaols
disposition of c;ircasses
• Carcass dccomposiliu,t ti Complete covering of Carcasses in burial ails;
C , Proper location/construction ofdisposal pits
Ine:urci:deus Ineonq,lciccutnt"raion
ANY ,vc,ul er 11. 1996, Page 4
n Secondary stack burners

Source Cause 11MPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Staudinb water around a Improper drainage;
facililin 0 Microbial decomposition of
Grade and landscape such that water drains
away from facilities
organic matter
Manurc tracked onto _ Poorly maimained access roads Of Fann access road maintenance -
public roads frnm farm
access
Additional Information : Available From :
Swi,rc T•tanure Maual;entent ; 0200 ltule/BMP Packet NCS1 J, County Extension Cenler
Swine 1'041riction Farm Potential Odor Sources acid Remedies ; f-BAG Fact Sheet NCSII - IIAI:
StvinC fend►►coon Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAG 128-88 NCSII - 13A1i
Swine 1'roduction Facility Manurc Management: Underfloor Flash - lagoon Treatment ; EBA1? 129-88 NCSIJ - BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; MAE 103-83 NCSI I - BAH
Calibration of Manure anti Wastewater Application Equipment ; EBAl~ Fact Sheet NCSII - IIAI:
Controlling Odors from Swine Diiildings ; 1`1111-33 NCSIJ - Swine Extension
Fiivirnnrncntal Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual NC fork Producers Assoc
01mmis for Managing Odor ; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force NCSII Agri C0111[111titicatinn5
Nuisance Concerns in Aniriial Maiutre Management: Odors and Flies ; 11I1O107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
A hi( - 1 I r 1990. I'11;e 5

' Ti I I c 1]ES I GN I S FOR: A S I NCiLE . ;TALE. LAGOON
' ENTS NAME
AYS PATE
TANCE TO NEAREST NONFARM RESIDENCE
' BER OF PIGS WEANLING 1-0 FEEDER _ --•--
BER: OF PI Ci S F= E-EDER TO FINISH
__ ----.-
BER OF SOWS FARF:OW TO Wf= ANI-_ I NG
BER OF SOWS FARROW TO F'EEDEF,
BER OF SOWS FARROW TO FINISH
REE OF ODOR CONTROL
(minimum 1.(-) cu. ft. per lb SSLW)
(mas'imurrt 3.0 cu. ft. per lb S aLW)
BER OF YEARS OF SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
CRAIG PERRY
HAL I FA X COUNTY., NORTH CAROL. I NA
1/26/94
0 FEET
ci
0
fl
I. C)
Coe. YEARS.
V;
LENGTH AT NORMAL WATER: LEVEL =_-.-_.-.
4 9. i)
FEET'
WIDTH AT NORMAL WATER LEVEL ___-- -- .
178.C)
FEET
MAL ..WATER LEVEL ELEVATION ___. ___---
52.4
E= EET
,SONAL HIGH WATER T-ABLE:: ELEVATION =_- -
44.6
FEET
iDON BOTTOM ELEVATION =____----__----_-.
45.4
FEET
th at F='e)-Mallent Water 7. C) -feet
nimum depth without sludge = 6 feet)
nimum depth with Sludge =- S feet)
E SLOPES _____---_--_-______ -__ ----
2.5:
1
manent Volume Required - 5riC)C?o0.0 cubic
feet
mAnent Volume Provided 540556.3 cubic
feet
11
I T I ONAL DRAINAGE AREA IN SQUARE FEET � i SQUARE FEET"
e. pumpout pond & other outside area)
GTH OF PUMPING CYCLE 180 DAYS
LONS OF FRESH WATER ADDED DAILY = - C ) GALLONS
ESS RAINFALL ABOVE EVAPORATION =__--. 13.3 INCHES
R/24HR STORM RAINFALL = ---______-- -• 6.7 INCHES
EBOARD 1.o FEET
parary Storage Volume-303279.9 cubic
of Dam Elevation = 36.9 feet
ide Dimensions of Lagoon at Top of Dam
gth = 520.0 feet Width = 20C).o feet
in Pumping Elevation = 35.2 feet
P Pumping Elevation = 52.4 feet
0
z
T

STEADY STATE LIVE
WEIGHT
p
head
weanl ing to feeder
x 30 lbs. =
0
lbs
4000
head
feeder
to finishing
x 135 lbs. -
540000
lbs
0
sows
farrow
to weanl ing
x 433 lbs. =-
0
lbs
0
sows
farrow
to. feeder x
522 lbs. _
0
lbs
U
sows
farrow
to finish x
1417 lbs. -
0
lbs
TOTAL
STEADY
STATE LIVE WEIGHT
(SSLW) -
5400 0
1 b s
ISLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Sludge accumulates at the rate of 0.080 cu. ft. per year -
per pound of STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT in Swine.
Years of sludge accumulation in design? 0.0
sludge Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
REQUIRED LIQUID VOLUME OF LAGOON
Design for 1.0 cu. ft. per pound SSLW
Total Volume = (SSLW * Design factor) + Sludge Volume
Total Volume = 540000.0 cubic feet
NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL
Maintain normal lagoon liquid level at elevation 52.4 feat
Construct lagoon bottom elevation 45.4 feet
Lagoon size for normal lagoon liquid volume using prismodial formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 DEFTH
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 7.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
498.0 178.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
Lb * Wb =
463.0 143.0
AREA OF MIDSECTION
(Lm * Wm)
88644.0 (AREA OF TOP)
66205.0 ( AREA OF BOTTOM)
4SO . a 160.5 77120.3 ( AREA OF MIDSECTION)
CU . YD . = C AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOM I * DEPTH/6
88644.0 30B461.0 66209.0 1.167
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT NORMAL LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL = 54c i556.2 C'.0 . FT.
VOLUME. NEEDED = 540000.0 CU. FT.
THE SURFACE DIMENSIONS OF THE LAGOON AT NORMAL LIQUID LEVEL.
ARE 498.0 FEET LONG BY 178.0 FEET WIDE

DIKE
p}.ace spoil as a continuous dike to elevation
TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon ( top of dike)
Length * Width -
520.0 200.0 104000 square feet
Additional Drainage Area
TOTAL DA
pumping cycle to bca
0 squares feet
104000 square feet
180 days.
56.3 feet.
-re ll/c�
. urn ���� ��'• /.
r•£-
6A. Volume of waste produced
volume = 540000 SSLW * 0.01 gallon/lb. SSLW/d8y # 180 days
in the primping cycle / 7.48 gallons per cu. ft.
Volume = 129946.5 cubic feet
6B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water- used for washing floors or
volume fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that
recycle the lagoon water are accounted for in 6A.
Volume = 0 gallons/day 180 days in the pumping
cycle divided by 7.48 gallons per Cu- ft.
Volume = o.0 cubic feet
6E. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest
amount.
Excess rainfall (difference) =
13.3 inches
Volume = 13.3 inches * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 115 66.7 cubic feet
6D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 6.7 inches * DA / 1R inches per foot
Vo 1 ucne = 58066.7 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
6A.
129946.5
cubic
feet
6B.
0.0
cubic
feet
6C.
115266.7
cubic
feet
6D .
50066.7
cubic
feet
TOTAL_ TEMPORARY STORAGE 303279.9 cubic feet

DEPTH OF STORAGE REQUIRED (ABOVE NORMAL LIQUID ELEVATION OF LAGOON)
Depth
required
= Volume
o! temporary storage divided
by surface
area
of Iagoon.
Depth
required
=
303280
cu.
ft. /
88644 sq. ft.
Depth
required
=
3'4
feet
Normal
lagoon
liquid elevation =
52'4
feet
Depthrequired
e uired
=
_
� 4
feet
Freeboard
=
1.0
feet
Top of
Dam�~�
=
56.8
feet
DIMENSIONS
OF THE INSIDE EDGE
OF THE
DAM AT
ELEVATION 56,8
ARE
520.0
FEET BY
200.0
FEET
SET BEGIN PUMPING
ELEVATION
PUMPED
STORAGE
VOLUME
6A.
129946.5
cubic
feet
6B.
8.0
cubic
feet
6C.
115266.7
cubic
feet
TOTAL
PUMPED VOLUME
=
245213'2
cubic
feet
Depth required = Volume of pumped storage divided by surface
area of lagoon at normal water level.
Depth required = 245213.2 cu. ft. / 88644 sq. ft.
Depth required = ee feet :-� ~
DESIGNED �T0«#/b / APPROVED BY:
DATE: �-� «� -94 DATE: +/ ~

• 1 • y
• S. Department of Agriculture
it Conservation Service
f
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET,FOR DAMS � 1
ndowner Lca •Q Pe- o-V County tic, !_!• �av _
rG c f-
lmunity or Group No. G - Z - /3 No.
timated Depth of Water to Top of DamFt. Length of Flood Pool C C Ft.
to of Field Hazard Investigation /r_ 'fir
aluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
om sudden dam failure.
E st. ev.
sElevation
Kind of
:Improvements:
of Breach
each: Length:
Width:
Slope: Land Use
Improvements
Above :Floodwater Above
FIood Plain:
Flood Plain
Ft.
Ft.
l
Ft.
Ft.
'1
41
3
;tribe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or pra able future downstream
irovements from a sudden breachIc�
4e bye �eGC�t�n rGAs,,JezY 4r�Jc e
:ard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
i Class•fic tion (I, II, III,(1V, V) .T
r� LC �i f
u;-e 61-LQ r, c� ec �� c r Date �l " • I2.
name (title)
curred ByT Date --.;5
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.

F ' ' P I.
• ' �� : • � �i• y : � . • + 1� ICI �
ducer: (?rcx; G t_ nn e rr
purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out the
tine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine waste
agement system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance is
sidered to be normal good care of the system. Good maintenance adds
beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and side
slopes: Fe6cUe- is being
established on these areas. Beginning in 19'5 and each year'
thereafter, the embankment should be fertilized with 800 pounds
of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be done
by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of all three.
This will need to be done at least once each year and possibly
twice in years favorable to heavy growth of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the
initial filling of the lagoon and at least annually. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Overflow Pipes
a. condition of pipes
(1) separation of joints
(2) cracks or breaks
2. Pool Area
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability - slumps or bulges
C. erosion and rodent damage
4. Transfer Pump
1

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Operation
Your animal,4.�U to anagement facility was designed for a total of
4�00erots ( toThe lagoon contains both
,rpermanent and temporary storage . The g)ananent storag�is not to be
pumped in order to ensure that anaerobic action will occur. The
esign includes permanent storage of one cubic foot per pound of
steady state live weight.
The temporary storage portion of the lagoon includes capacity for the
volume of waste produced over 180 days, the amount of rainfall in a
25 year 24 hour storm event, and rainfall in excess of evaporation.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage;
therefore, it will need to be pumped every six months. Begin pump -
out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches elevation 55'.2-_ as marked
by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when the fluid level reaches
elevation L2-�j_.
The attached waste management plan should be followed. This plan
recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B) before
land application. The waste material should be analyzed before each
application cycle to determine its nutrient content. A soil test of
the area of application should be made annually to insure the waste
is applied as reasonably and practically possible to recommended
rates.
It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -charged
to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during start-up. Pre -
charging reduces the concentration of the initial waste entering the
lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be covered with
effluent at all times.
The Clean Water Act of 1477 prohibits the discharge of pollutants
into waters of the United States. The Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Management,
has the responsibility for enforcing this law.
2

JUN-03-2004 THU 04:24 PM DENR RRO FAX NO. 19195714718 P. 02
DEVICES TO AUTOMATICALLY STOP MMGATION EVENTS
The State of North Carolina has issued NPDES General Permits for animal facilities to=­operat'0 in l�rth
Carolina. These Permits meet moth State and EPA requirements and provide coverage fc�'the follbwing1_es
of facilities.
NCA200000 (Swine Facilities) oN
NCA300000 (Cattle Facilities) °p
NCA400000 (PoultryFc:cilitim with a wet waste nianagcment system) €, z
You have recently been issued a Ccrtificatc of Coverage (COC) to operate your anima `facility rider one of
these General Permits. f.1
Condition 11. 16. of each of these. Permits reacts as follows:
Within one hundred anti twenty (120) days of the effective date of a COC issued under this permit, the
permittee shall i nstal1, operate a nd to aintain d evices o n a 11 i irigation p umps/equipment d esigned t o
automatically stolz irri ration activities during precipitation. This condition does not apply to manure
spreaders or other uquipment pulled by manned vehicles_
The permittee will not bo, required to install, operate and maintain the devices if the permittee commits
to provide for the presence of the OIC or the designated backup OIC at all times during the land
application of waste. T1iis commitment must be submitted in writing to the Division prior to the 1200'
clay following the effective date of the COC on a form supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
Please check the box below that indicates your commitment to do one of the following.
❑ Within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the effective date of a COC issued under this permit, I
shall install, operate anti maintain devices on all irrigation pumps/equipment designed to automatically
stop irrigation activities dtEring precipitation. This condition does not apply to manure spreaders or other
equipment pulled by manned vehicles.
lid I will commit to provicic ihr the presence of the Operator in Charge (0.1C) or the designated backup QIC
at all times during (lie land application of waste.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly.gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based oii my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those
persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, tnie, accMOM, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Facility Name Facility Number /�� - „-Q z
Permit Number t�
_r� w
Signature
Signature
(if differe
DTA$lE 3.14-03
illd(type or print)
;Operator ' Charge
from P i4in i t t cc)
42 Z— ©!1
Date
7

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Craig Perry
Perry Hog Farm
Rt 1 Box 431
Scotland Neck NC 27874
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Perry Hog Farm
Facility ID#: 42-7
Halifax County
Dear Mr. Perry:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996,
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, w ;0
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Nvf An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122.41 including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit. please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
�J
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E. o
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
CV Cr.:
S
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) �5 0- ;
Halifax County Health Department d #
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section a
Halifax County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA242007 _
Permit File AWS420007
NDPU Files

f W A rF9
Michael F. Easley, Governor
o
QG
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
O�
r
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2003
Craig Perry
Perry Hog Farm
890 Bynum's Bridge Rd.
Scotland Neck NC 27874
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA242007
Perry Hog Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Halifax County
Dear Craig Perry:
On March 14, 2003, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities in North Carolina to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance with your application received on February 12, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Craig Perry, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES General
Permit NCA200000. The issuance of this COC. supercedes and terminates your COC Number
AWS420007 to operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Perry Hog Farm, located in Halifax County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 4000 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keepin>;
and monitoring conditions in this permit. The Devices to Automatically Stop Irrigation Events Form
must be returned to the Division of Water Quality no later than 120 days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. imal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the Division of Water Quality by no later than March 1st of each year.
wpa►
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Intemet httpJlh2o.enr.state.ne.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Semite Center Telephone 1 SW 623-7748
An Equal opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number.of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
CRAIG PERRY
RT 1 BOX 431
SCOTLAND NECK NC 27874
919-826-4766
Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
4000.00 hogs
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be -used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste.based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips -are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.

r
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This p,an is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in -the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allowadditional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
4000 hogs x 1.9,tons waste/hogs/year = 7600 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
4000 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 9200 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be -needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.

r
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
5489
34
GtB
FH
3.8
190
0
4.22
801.8
I
SEP-MAY
5489
FH
15
132
1EXA
I
14.3
�0
5489
35
EXA.
BH
6.5
0
I
1325
5489
�35
EXA
SG
29
49.3 0
1
I
5489
37
GtC
FH
3.$
0
I
1190
10.4512246.75
SEPT-MAY
20.87 6182.75
MAR-OCT
20.87 1028.89
NOV-APR
1.6 1304
SEPT-MAY
END
TOTAL111164.1
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may
require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan
only addresses nitrogen.

4
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land,
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 0
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. Infields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October.' Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
FH
TALL FESCUE -HAY
TONS
.50
SG
SMALL GRAIN'OVERSEEDED
1.7
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
**
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
37.14
11164.19
0
0
37.14
11164.19
* BALANCE
-1964.191
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown Lin each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,-
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than the
acres shown in the tables.
See 'attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
A -
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 1480 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 7400
pounds of. PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 24.6666666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 59.2 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
-
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 251s depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited byinitial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size,.and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The follDwing table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Crop
Application Rate
(in/hr)
Applic. Amount
(inches)
5489
32,-.
ExA
FH
0.35
*1.0
5489
34
GtB
FH
0.35
*1.0
5489
35
ExA
BH
0.35
*1..0
5489
37
GtC
FH
0.35
*1.0
5489
ExA
SG
0.35
*1.0
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the,soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be'applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil.
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be'removed on the average of once every 6.00
months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored in
your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot
of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm..
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive -the waste analysis
report for assistance' in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge -during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet,. but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at"5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field.. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does.not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events; or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that.
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
'P A "A ! R

4
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potenuial for
leaching. waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than'30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after'bctober 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the. land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river.(other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or -wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied t-o prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water -courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, '
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
D0ryo- 4

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes.vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human"consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds. 1.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization.and soil
shall -be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry_
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. De.ad animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
24. The smaller of the old lagoons -has been converted and upgraded
to a gravity flow catch basin from the houses, where the waste
will be concentrated and pumped over into the new lagoon.
25. Thb large old lagoon will be closed out to meet N.RCS lagoon
closure specifications by the year 2001 as required by the
Halifax County Livestock: Ordinance.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and..,the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system'or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24--hour'
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: CRAIG PERRY
(Please print) /
Signature: a Date:
Name of Manager f di Brent from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (Please print)John Y Clark
Affiliation:NRCS Phone No. 919-583-3481
Address (Agency): Post Office Box 8
Halifax
a
Signature:
-- c
NC 27839-10CM
Page: 11

6
I,
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Wasste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The fields) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen,'phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19— to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
D] ev-0 - 19.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH,CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
5
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
n--e- 1Z

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization„_ Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF.NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
a Notary
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
i7 a RR E 14

' ~�.C' ' �•'i•r.. �� 1 .rn '�`-... 4, HrY} ;J: f ;.i..'•fl�' `+ .[';�.'r. •Ic -
' �.' _ ` .fir ` �y�rm � /.'-�y.�•'` Gy,�y '2 f.�+,i�� ril'' j1�3�:?�,SX• �.
,1Y ,�� •' .!4 . 4 'fr. ',S`„t'�r�� F1S'b
•�,;• { a. G� �i�,�,i�7h•�Q���'.'� r~M1:I. y!I'.Yih�'f::v`�J .,, t i�}!�'.`. �Y
rl{•J��?�-R}f}{fit!'•
I' j h;`•/ t ~r�i • J V; .,,lwk
`tl� `Q :w. h',s' G� ' r..� _l. .�, aj..' L y44
Uj
1941� m .p �1 4 n•w
IL _�a,y, W`t-�I I;-I'_"';I Lx'' t'i�•r;j.2�'�,:11'�r',•
r" i J
�` t J 1.1 a s- ,• �I.' �.:J`r,��.�i� - t• h�s
�, 0. "'Y I,,. • !� c{ 1I' ',yfiE r •.`-:old.
el
i m GPI � -� _ / � CT ••� '� } �� �ti,:�,*.4
�m�i ,� tC1 ut G) �`•' (t� tty L! +i ,,,� .�,►':ri,�.'i
LS' fn
`�!•or N �`4 'fir►,': �'y 4 ` 1 _\ it �S W •u ' i4� Sri` �'.;r �� ?� ' j�•.
Nf
' �k '' �' ".��••, `"
611
r• da. � � i .i�5•��Pf .. �Q � ,� � ::J�p',p4, •' � a . 1. Jpt+ 4�As7 1p�t'~. f� L� �7
-� .,. i � �• I .(}jb r rw .t� £ Y y�rf=- G��+1 �i.l }r t: {�����:..
�'3r. ::'.' �'Tsi� •' c,�ti err . `'
r,. 1 A,
5, � rd�a`' � fl'i L� �4 Ali; , E,•�',i�+��:E��y,.� i

• } � � . �,, } c. ,fir > � -` /�•
+='•1'�'p'1�'; fr)'o�: -t rid'! r-V� �' ^ it ' S' rw
YIN
r�,• r jr
'7. r y' r w. J Si �} ,. F5'� ?Ti`e S i( _ �I♦�h �'�- C :;'
FA
� No
Lk
l r ,, �. ,�� c I•�p � r 1 , , •
'"'-S �.} '••. '. _i Jyp. yF j, 3 F♦ �_;'� 4 n _. 1,��.� ���Mf ir��.•i.
1
`_-6�l`-+;�' •i''Y':�� "t'_ ° �'tr w",.ay.��'V �D .r rr i.j f. / r
��� ^1,. 'f� S �+ r°I •: SV'Iw ray- t. �.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHON-E N-U11v BERS
DWQ 9,'9-5-71- 97o,�)
EiERGEVCY hf:5►,.NAGEVrEN-T SY STEM i - -93 - za3/
SWCD 919 -,Sb3 - 3¢�/
N-RCS
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking.
Overflowing, or ruMtng off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
cnsure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible Iocation for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
I. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the Iagoon immediaEcly.
d. Call a pumping contractor. .
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the r=o'n(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close %-glees to eliminate further -discharge.
d. Repair all leaks p7or to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses. solid 5eparator;7ac:1on include:
a. Slop recycle pump.
b. Slop irri_ga[ion pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occur-
5-J. S[op ,:il tlo%� : in ih,z house. r;u�'a �r > IiJ jz�lrl[Jr�.

100 WELL BUFFER
lUc
112 tic
T3 I DING
TPACJT,
Ir
If t
\3 II
4r �
-4z
FIELD NO. 32-
4p
N— x
AL
J.-
12
7
--
t
)UILDING
103
to 4 4r
10 10L
01- x
IN
r, @10
UILD G
DIRT ROAD
LEGEND
— 11 — I — v — C- IF I n Pnl INDMV

b pp
4 \
� F —
Ar
IELD NIJ. 32
, r
L ------- —— • `fyy i
WILDING �. 1 r v
103 r I
104vo—
a Y if
/ !
CHARGE
ling)
F
�HYnRANT
EI
Pvc PIPE 1
ir
ulo r 1
Ar
DIRT ROAD.
LEGEND
-- M--Y -%--Y FIELD BOUNDRY
-s-4--4- -4- 2-INCH LATERAL_
-- 3-INCH LATERAL
--F-,--.- 4-INCH LATERAL
6-INCH SUPPLY LINE
X SPRINKLER
a GATE OR GLOBE VALVE
a TRAVERSE SURVEY -POINT
© AIR/VACUUM RELEIF VALVE
TEMPORARY BENCHMARK.
ZONE IDENTIF-ICATI❑N NO,
'lhr / t - L
C R AIG
IfZEz1GATI0N
pF�;Fzlz)
Eslc;
>>
- 3900 111 HALIFAX COUNTY, NC

96
FIELD NO. 34 .................
ED
7
d
0001
7 IN —
POND �4✓ - S._, �}
N
At <.3 FICLa'
r \ r L
Ar
FNZAVV E R S SUR VE
L
TO
11 N RCTTS, S U P PY' I T-i N Ry YOHEISFO SUPPL El I
ijUNDERNEATH LATERAL. . I
ji
jr
�• � / %*/ �' ',/ � • \ r ,M,� , 1 ,., +, r to - ,' ' /� \
'loll� � % � � � �
4r
i - _
4k
-4-
46
84
-4
PROPERTY LINE' UD
SEE NOTE -NO, 12
its- IM
jr _-V, <
1.00 0 100 200 300, , " � Ar ,
I FIELD NO, 35a jr_—
inn/

*11-6
Abb
9D.
WELL�
PAL
B D 6 UILD
Nn. 35
mmliffilz
X
A02
ARL PV PIPE OFF SUPPLY LINE TO THE FIRST
S INKLL,� SHALL
��LL B& 4'j�, Dl�M�TER AND
A "Al N/ k, Ll I A A rl rl 1 c*
L. m uil
V1.
Ir
41
r �..
C)
r r �� ,
OWN -ER:
1-0-7 CRAIG PERRY
RT, I BOX 431
104 SCOTLAND NECK, NC 27874