350022_PERMIT FILE_20171231

i
�gpAndrews Hunt Farms,
P.O. Box 908
Bailey, NC 27807
[phone]
To: N.C. Dept of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Special Attn: S. Jay Zimmerman, L.G.
Subject: Notice of Violation
NOV-2010-PC-0453
Castalia Farm No. AWS350022
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Zimmerman:
LLC
V MAY ��In
I apologize to you and your staff for having to self -report our lagoon level exceeding the
19" mark. During an on site visit, our lagoon level was confirmed at 18". During this
process of review, we were cited with several violations, in which I will attempt to
address and correct.
Violation 1: General Conditions
Lagoon level was 18" one inch below the 19" mark. The reason for this violation
is strictly due to our management philosophy. At Andrews Hunt Farms we have a
large amount of land in which we use to manage our waste. Our normal practice
for years is aggressive pumping in the spring and fall. Normally each year we
will pump our lagoons down during the fall to minimize winter pumping while
letting the lagoon level rise during the winter months. Our plans are to use the
lagoon water for spring planting of our crops. This year the excessive and
frequent rains accumulated in this process. We almost timed it perfectly because
we were within 30 days of needing large amounts of lagoon water, which is our
only source of Nitrogen. Our lagoon level was corrected immediately and our
level reached the 19" mark within a few days of our inspection.
Violation 2: Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
We realized after the fact that our sludge survey was due 12/30/2009 with reports
due 3/31/2010. What created this problem was our farms were under exemption
status for several years. We did not have a multi -year calendar to log the due date
and this date was not recorded. We did have a letter in our file stating this due
date and this was overlooked. We did not realize that the survey was a critical

time sensitive issue. However our sludge survey has been completed and was
presented to the inspector at the time of her inspection. She alerted me that it was
an automatic NOV and suggested we send it in with our response. Our new
sludge survey is enclosed.
Respectfully,
iG�
R.C. Hunt
May 21, 2010

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 23, 2010
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RECEIPT # 7006 0810 0002 60491725
R. C. Hunt
astalia Farm
P.O. Box 908
Bailey, NC 27807
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
�# id MAY ? � 7nin
OFFICE
NOV-2010-PC-0453
Castalia Farm
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS350022
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Hunt:
On February 12, 2010, staff of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer Protection Section (APS),
conducted a Structure Evaluation at the Castalia Farm. The evaluation was the result of Non -Compliance
Notification received on February 8, 2010. On April 7, 2010 staff of the DWQ, APS, 'conducted a Compliance
Evaluation.
As a result of the above evaluations, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -discharge
permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2T .1300, you have been found to be
in violation of your 2T .1300 Permit
Violation 1: Genera! Conditions
1.) At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed theIevil tL--
provides adequate storage to contain the 25year, 24-hour storm event plus an'addanonw. the (1).F
of structural freeboard except that there shall be no violation of this condition -if- (2). J _ z -F.6`
event more severe than a 25-year, 24-hour. event, (b) the Perminee is Irr rco
and (c) there is at least one (1) foot cif structural freeboard
On February 8, 2010, Mr. Hunt reported to Buster Towel] that the Castalia Farms lagoon lee[ was
the required freeboard. At the time of the February evaluation the lagoon was at 18 inches. The
designed 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus structural storage requirement is 19 inches.
Violation 2: Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
1.) All facilities, which are issued a COC to operate under this General Permit, shall conduct a survey of
the sludge accumulation in all lagoons every year. This survey frequency may be reduced if it can be
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Division that the rate of sludge accumulation does not warrant
an annual survey. A sludge survey extension was granted on September 20, 2006. Due to the
Aquifer Protection Section
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh North Carolina 276WI628 te
Location: 3800 Barrett Dr., Raleigh, !North Carolina 27609��,O7y „,dPhone: 919-791-42U01 FAX: [phone] Custornu Service: 1-877-623-6748 1 1Internet: www.ncwalerclualitv.oM �/ yf1 jAn liqual Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employeri1iL %ti j{YJ

R. C. Hunt
Castalia Farm
April 23, 2010
Page 2 of 2
amounts of treatment volume available, the Division agreed that a sludge survey was not needed until
2009. The results of the 2009 sludge survey were to have been submitted by March 1, 2010.
After a review of our files it was determined that a sludge survey was not submitted by March 1,
2010. During the compliance evaluation Mr. Hunt stated that the required sludge survey was not
completed in 2009. Mr. Hunt was reminded in February and June of 2009, of the requirement for the
survey.
The following items specify additional concerns as a result of the inspection. (Also please refer to the attached
evaluation/ report):
U�
1. Waste plan that is on file (not signed) list tract #178 as leased or otherwise owned. A current certified
waste plan signed by "owner" complete with maps needs to be completed and submitted as required by
- permit.
2. Freeboard records from November 2009 to current date were not available. Please include them with
your response.
You are required to take any necessary action to correct the above violations immediately and to provide a
written response to this Notice within 30 days of receipt. Please include in your response all corrective actions
already taken and a schedule for completion of any corrective actions not addressed.
Please note that assessment of civil penalties may have already been recommended for violations described within
this Notice of Violation. Failure to comply with the State's rules, in the manner and time specified, may result in
the assessment of additional civil penalties and/or the use of other enforcement mechanisms available to the State.
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to the
Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five
thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms,
conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A.
If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Jane Bernard or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
S. Z4rman, L.G_
Environmental Program Supervisor
attachments: Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Johnston County Environmental Health Department
RRO-APS Files
Keith Larick CAFO Unit

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 350022 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS35QQ22 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: QnalCjignee ln§oection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Franklin Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 041072010__ Entry Time:1200 AM Exit Time: 12:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Andrews Hun: F QstaG ____ _ Owner Email: rchunt(Msftnc.com
Owner. Andrews Hunt Fauns LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 7038 Wilson NC 278957038
Physical Address: 299 jgsggli Rd Castalia NC 27816
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
56 Hway tD Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Question Areas:
0 Records and Documents
Integrator:Murphy-Brown, LLC
Latitude:36"04'34" Longitude:78°06'05"
Certified Operator: Robert C Hunt Operator Certification Number 25249
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Sine Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name R. C. Hunt Phone: Primary Inspector, Jane Bernard Phone: ! 1p
1 - q
Inspector Signature: (iL31 Date: N..>}_r._11
Secondary
Inspection Summary:
Audit of records conducted between 2112/10 to current date.
Signed waste plan for farm is not on file. Waste plan that is on file (not signed) list tract #178 as leased or otherwise owned. A current
certified waste plan signed by "owner complete with maps is needed.
Sludge survey extension granted on 9/20106. Sludge survey due in 2009 was not completed or submitted by March 2010, as required
by extension.
This review was just to answer questions and concerns regarding the information needed to complete a proper Compliance
Inspection. Site visit was on 02/1212010. During the structure evaluation records were obtained. Freeboard records were available
up to 11 /15/2009. Freeboard records from 11/15/2009 to current date need to be submitted in order to complete a proper evaluation.
During this meeting Mr. Hunt had the Castaiia records but did not have the complete freeboard information.
Page: 1

PermEt. AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason far Visit: Routine
Waste stmctums
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon LAGOON 07/26t94 18.60
Page: 2

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews hunt Farms LLC Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? 0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
■
. Other?. - - - - - - - - - --- _ . - -- -- .- . - -- _.-. - - - -- - - -- - -- — - - -- - - ■ -
21. Does record keeping need improvement? 001111
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? , ❑
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fall to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

MAY-21-2010 15:19 FROM;BAILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
TO:19195714718 P.1-13
ANDREws HUNTFARms, LLC
BA QiNO7i1 BOX
BNLE'�', NORGAkAttC?iZU1278(►7 l
To:,..h 9 NE I Date: .45--A 1- 10 Fax#• 5al ---qJJI
From:
R.C. Hunt ❑ Tracy Greenwaldt
Office Location
:
P.O. Box 908
Bailey, N.C.2780T natr ,c�;hans:
❑ URG ENT1 ❑ Personal/Confidential
(252) 23"033 Office
[phone] - Fax ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Please Reply
❑ For Your Review 1 Information
NOTESrCOMMENTS: A+f N ; S. ZSA,4 z i nM rhe.Rrn f4n4
Total # of pages including cover.
The Information contained in this facsimile message is legally privrreped and confidential Infomtatlon it Is Intended solety for the use of the
Individual or entity named ebovo. If you have rocetved this facs:milo in error. ploaoo notify uo immediefoiy by tebphone (Vason) and discard
the Ony eopies *fit Your prompt waparntlon Is appreciated.

MAY-21-2010 15:21 FROM:BAILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2270 TO:19195714718 P.2/3
Mfi4'y,,71.
Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
P.O. Box 908
Bailey, NC 27807
[phone]
To; N.C. Dept of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Special Attn: S. Jay Zimmerman, L.G.
Subject: Notice of Violation
NOV-2010-PC-0453
Castalia Farm No. AWS350022
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Zimmerman:
I apologize to you and your staff for having to self --report our lagoon level exceeding the
19" mark. During an on site visit, our lagoon level was confirmed at 18". During this
process of review, we were cited with several violations, in which I will attempt to
address and correct.
Violation 1; General Conditions
Lagoon level was 18" one inch below the 19" mark. The reason for this violation
is strictly due to our management philosophy. At Andrews Hunt Farms we have a
large amount of land in which we use to manage our waste. Our normal practice
for years is aggressive pumping in the spring and fall. Normally each year we
will pump our lagoons down during the fall to minimize winter pumping while
letting the lagoon level rise during the winter months. Our plans are to use the
lagoon water for spring planting of our crops. This year the excessive and
frequent rains accumulated in this process. We almost timed it perfectly because
we were within 30 days of needing large amounts of lagoon water, which is our
only source of Nitrogen. Our lagoon level was corrcctcd immediately and our
level reached the 19" mark within a few days of our inspection,
Violation 2: Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
We realized after the fact that our sludge survey was due 12/30/2009 with reports
due 3/31/2010. What created this problem was our farms were under exemption
status for several years. We did not have a mull -year calendar to log the due date
and this date was not recorded. We did have a letter in our file stating this due
date and this was overlooked. We did not realize that the survey was a critical

MAY-21-2010 15:22 FROM:BAILEY FOODS LLC
252 235 2270 TO:19195714719 P•3'3
time sensitive issue. However our sludge survey has been completed and was
presented to the inspector at the time of her inspcction. She alertcd rime that it was
an automatic NOV and suggested we send it in with our response. Our new
sludge survey is mclosod.
Respectfully,
R.C. 1iunt
May 21, 2010

ALT X7 WA
�FA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of� Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Calee13 1-1. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 23, 2010
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RECEIPT # 7006 0810 0002 6049 1725
R. C. Hunt
Castalia Farm
P.O. Box 908
Bailey, NC 27807
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2010-PC-0453
Castalia Farm
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS350022
Franklin County
Dear Mr, Hunt:
On February 12, 2010, staff of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ}, Aquifer Protection Section (APS),
conducted a Structure Evaluation at the Castalia Farm. The evaluation was the result of Non -Compliance
Notification received on February 8, 2010. On April 7, 2010 staff of the DWQ, APS, conducted a Compliance
Evaluation.
As a result of the above evaluations, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -discharge
permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2T .1300, you have been found to be
in violation of your 2T .1300 Permit.
Violation 1: General Conditions
1.) At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that
provides adequate storage to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus an additional one (1) foot
of structural freeboard except that there shall be no violation of this condition if: (a) there is a storm
event more severe than a 25-year, 24-hour event, (b) the Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP,
and (c) there is at least one (1) foot of structural freeboard.
On February 8, 2010, Mr. Hunt reported to Buster Towell that the Castalia Farms lagoon level was in
the required freeboard. At the time of the February evaluation the lagoon was at 18 inches. The
designed 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus structural storage requirement is 19 inches.
Violation 2: Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
1.) All facilities, which are issued a COC to operate under this General Permit, shall conduct a survey of
the sludge accumulation in all lagoons every year. This survey frequency may be reduced if it can be
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Division that the rate of sludge accumulation does not warrant
an annual survey. A sludge survey extension was granted on September 20, 2006. Due to the
Aquircr PI'MCCtion Section
I(i28 Mail ScrviceCenWr, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
�f1�}
Location: 3WO Barmt Dr., Raleigh. North Caroline 27(0)
FAX: 1-47181.CUSUlnlerSCI'Vi 1-977-623-674R
No LhCC�I��111C�
Phone:9I9.791-42W�91U-57:
Intcrrot: www nelyaterquality Or]
NaturaMy
An 1-qual Oppollumly 1 Allinnative AC61111 Fmploycr

k. C. Hunt
Castalia Farm
April 23, 2010
1'age 2 of'2
amounts of treatment volume available, the Division agreed that a sludge survey was not needed until
2009. The results of the 2009 sludge survey were to have been submitted by March 1, 2010.
After a review of our files it was determined that a sludge survey was not submitted by March 1,
2010. During the compliance evaluation Mr. Hunt stated that the required sludge survey was not
completed in 2009. Mr. Hunt was reminded in February and June of 2009, of the requirement for the
survey.
The following items specify additional concerns as a result of the inspection. (Also please refer to the attached
evaluation/ report):
Waste plan that is on file (not signed) list tract #178 as leased or otherwise owned. A current certified
waste plan signed by "owner" complete with maps needs to be completed and submitted as required by
permit.
2. Freeboard records from November 2009 to current date were not available. Please include them with
your response.
You are required to take any necessary action to correct the above violations immediately and to provide a
written response to this Notice within 30 days of receipt. Please include in your response all corrective actions
already taken and a schedule for completion of any corrective actions not addressed.
Please note that assessment of civil penalties may have already been recommended for violations described within
this Notice of Violation. Failure to comply with the State's rules, in the manner and time specified, may result in
the assessment of additional civil penalties and/or the use of other enforcement mechanisms available to the State.
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to the
Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five
thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms,
conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A.
If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Jane Bernard or me at (919)7914200.
Sincerely,
S. y Z merman, L.G.
Environmental Program Supervisor
attachments: Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Johnston County Environmental Health Department
RRO-APS Files
Keith Larick CAFO Unit

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 3 g22 _, Facility Status: Active __ _ Permit: AWS350022 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Franklin Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 04/07/2010 Entry Time:12:00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia) Owner Email: rchunt ansftnc.com
Owner: 6norews t1unt Farms LLC Phone: [phone]_
Mailing Address: PO pax 7 _ _Wilson NC 278957038
Physical Address: 299 Inscoe Rd Castalia NC 27816
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Ouestion Areas:
a Records and Documents
Integrator: muroit�L_n. LLc,
Latitude:36°04„ice" Longitude:78"06'05"
Certified Operator: Robert C Hunt Operator Certification Number: 25249
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name R. C. Hunt Phone:
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard ! Phone: I - q o .3
Inspector Signature: rV-1,32 lfa.r Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Audit of records conducted between 2112110 to current date.
Signed waste plan for farm is not on file. Waste plan that is on file (not signed) list tract #178 as leased or otherwise owned. A current
certified waste plan signed by "owner' complete with maps is needed.
Sludge survey extension granted on 9/20/06. Sludge survey due in 2009 was not completed or submitted by March 2010, as required
by extension.
This review was just to answer questions and concerns regarding the information needed to complete a proper Compliance
Inspection. Site visit was on 02/12/2010. During the structure evaluation records were obtained. Freeboard records were available
up to 11 /15/2009. Freeboard records from 11115/2009 to current date need to be submitted in order to complete a proper evaluation.
During this meeting Mr. Hunt had the Castalia records but did not have the complete freeboard information,
Page: 1

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC Facility Number : 350022
Inspection Date: 04/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON 07/26/94 18.60
Page: 2

Permit: AWS350022 Owner • Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC Facility Number : 350022
inspection Date: 04/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
IN
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual sail analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
NOD
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26, Did the facility fall to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 3

ANDRIWSH,w�-T FARM!), LIC
POST OFICE BOX 908
BAILEY, NOii_T -1 CA]ZOLNA :;'.7807
To: �._I����—_._ �� �_ _ Cate:�lY_.1 �— Fax#: 91 571." 117_Ig
Frc)m :
19 R.(::,. Hunt ❑ Tracy Greenwaldt
Office Location:
P.O. Box 908
Bailey, N.C. 2707 Ilns�tr�acl;ic�ns:
❑ IJR(ENT! ❑ Personal/Confidential
[phone] Office
(252) 235-:2278 - Fax ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Please Reply
11110 For Your Review / Information
RI _.. ��V ram _ a '=
MAY
Total # of pages including cover:
The information contained in this facsimile message is legally privileged and confidential information. It is intended solely for the use of the
individua€ or entity named above. If you have received this facsimile in error, please notify us immediately by telephone (Wilson) and discard
the original message and any copies of it. Your prompt cooperation is appreciated.

.. 't
We combined rainfall dates with production reports and consolidated into 1 report. They were separated at the
time of inspection.
Farm Name: Castalla
Farm
AWS350022
Date -- -
1/7/2009 _ -
Freeboard Rainfall -�
- ----- - 43 �_. ---- 0.4
Initial:t_
1/21/2009
42 0.1
1/27/09
41
215109
40 0.6
2112I09 ------
---. 39 -----
�
---
2126109 ---------
----------37----------- 0.2----
315109 - ----
- --35 --- -- I ---- 1
— -----
317109 -- —
35 -
i
—
3114109
34 i 0.5
I —
_
3121109
� 32
3130109--------------------3
�_--
— ------ 2
-30 -�� �
—
—
417109
--
1.2
4114109 --
----- 30 �-- 0.1
-�
4121109
-- 30 -- —
—
4129109
29 0.2
615109
29
5112109 ------
--28 ------ ; 0.2
— 26 _ —__ 2
26
-— 26 -----— 0.5 —
—
—
- ----
—
- —
-----
5118109
5124109
5130109
_-----
616109
26
619109
25 0.5
_
6116109 —^ —�
25 i 1
_-
6120109 ------
--— 25
6125109
26 -- --
-
713109 - .-
-— 26 ------ � ----
—__
716109
25 0.5
_
_
7/10/09
26
_
7/18/09
26 0.6
------
_--.---2_5_-_—_----_--- 0.7 —
-
-----
812I2009 . ---
25 0.2
25
8/9/2009
$11512009 ----
--- 26----
8/23/2009
27
8/29/2009 — —
- 26 0.25
8/31/2009
26 0.25
911/2009
26 0.5
91812009
_ 26
LO
i
S1
i.
r 1

We combined rainfall dates with production reports and consolidated into 1 report. They were separated at the
time of inspection.
Date_
Freeboard Rainfall
_---27__._:_-_,
Initials
911512009 - _-
_
9/2012009
27
26 0.2
9/24/2009
---
9125/2009
--- - -- - --- -- -�
—
27 0.3
-~�--27-
11
----
1012/2009
_--_
1019/2009
27
10/1512009 _
1012012009 _
28
- � 27 --- 0.5
10/2312009
26 0.2
i
10/3012009 ---- __--
-------- 26 --_W � 0.2--
--�--27
111612009 �--- -
---_ 0.2
111121089 -_—
---_ 27
11/19/2009
26 — 0.5
_
11 /2412009
--
---- 26 0.5
- -
11/3012010
26 ----� —
26 -- 1
----26
- ------
12/5/2009
-------
-
121812009
- ------- i _
0.2 ---
------ -
12115/2009
_- 25 I
_
12/19/2009
24 0.5
_
12/2412009
24 ;' _ 0.5
12131 /2009
- 24 0.7
1 /512010
1/1212010
24
1/1812010
24 1 —
—
1/2212010 -- -
-- 23 i � 1
—
-
1130110
_
22 Snow
218l2010-------
------19 ------
--------
219110 --
Below 19 _ Called DWQ
2115110 -----
---�-19---_-
2122110- - ----
2126110 ----
-- - --- 220-
_-�- 20
-
2128110
20
315110
21 E
--- --
---- --- 22--- ------- ---- -- — -- --
--------
- -
-
3114110
�----
3128110
24 ---- 2
----
413110 _—�__-_---
4110/10 _
4114110
--------23
— 23
- 24
i
_
rainfall Castalia Farm 2010.xis

Sheetl 0
North Carolina
Franklin County
Johnny Inscoe S Andrews Hunt Farms
Rental Agreement
This Rental Agreement made and entered Into this first day of April, 2003, by and
between, Johnny insc oe, Owner and Andrews Hunt Farms, Renter.
Mr. Inscoe agrees to rent one field which is approximately 10.4 acres and Is located
behind the pond on Inscoe road. The field Is Identified as part of Franklin Co. Tract # \11
and joins Andrews Hunt Farms which is identified as Tract # 189. IT,,.,.,,,,, * alb - i,VS p,
Rent: Renter shall pay, without notice or demand a yearly fee of $120.00 per acre. This
payment of $1248.00 shall be paid prior to April 1 st each year to secure the land for the
following season.
Term: The term is year by year, April to April, with automatic renewal. Either party
has the ability to terminate the lease at any time. If the owner chooses to terminate the
agreement after the rental payment has been made then he must return the yearly rental
payment. If the renter chooses to terminate the agreement after the rental payment has been
made then they will forfeit the rental payment.
�. Subject: Owner understands that this field will be used as an additional part of
the swine waste management program of Andrews Hunt Farms. Renter will have the ability
to rotate and change crop grown on the land to best suit their program. Owner understands
that swine waste will be applied to the crops and the crops will be harvested for hay.
Renter Obligations: Renter is obligated to maintain land in reasonable condition. Erosion
must be controlled and weeds must be mowed as necessary. If Owner is not satified with
this process he must notify renter in writing and problem must be com KAed within 30 days.
Counterparts: This rental agreement is executed this M: day March, 2003
by the two counterparts.
Land Owner
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦♦♦
MAY 5 20)0
OFF
Page 1

Appendix 1. Lagoon Sludge Survey Form
A. Farm Permit or, DWQ Identification Number
B. Lagoon Identification
35-22
1
C. Person(s) Taking Measurements R. C. Hurst
0. Date of Measurement
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
4/7/2010
Revised August 2008
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer.
Marked PVC Pipe
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon.
Marked PVC Pipe _
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler".
Marked PVC Pipe
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 3.5 (acres)
(Draw a sketch of the lagoon on a separate sheet, list dimensions, and calculate surface area. The lagoon
may have been built different than designed, so measurements should be made:)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 ac. 3.5 acres x 6 = 21 , with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform grid that has the same number of intersections as the
estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the intersection points on the lagoon grid so that data
recorded at each can be easily matched.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet" (Appendix 2). Also, at the
location of the pump intake, take measurements of distance from liquid surface to top of sludge
layer and record It on the Data Sheet (last row); this must be at least 2.5 ft. when irrigating.
I. At the time of the survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Present Liquid
Level (measure at the lagoon gauge pole):
J. Determine the distance from the top of bank to the Maximum Liquid Level
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records)
K. Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid to the Minimum Liquid level:
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records)
L. Calculate the distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level
(Item K Minus Item I, assuming the present liquid level is below the Maximum Liquid Level)
M. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the
lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points)
N. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the top
of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points):
O. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer:
P. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item N minus Item L):
Q. If item 0 is greater than Item P, proceed to the Worksheet for Sludge Volume and Treatment Volume.
If Item O Is equal to or less than Item P, you do not have to determine volumes.
Completed by: RTW ✓ Date:
Print N me ISi ature
a
2.1
1.9
4.1
2.0
10.8
9.1
1.7
7.1
4171701 n

Print Name
Revised August 2008
r� v Dale: 41712010
Sig ature
-(A) -
(e)
(C)
(C)-(B)
Grid Point
Distance from liquid surface
Distance from liquid
surface
Thickness
of sludge layer
No.
to top
of sludge
to lagoon
bottom
soil
Ft.
& in.
Ft.
tenths
Ft.
& in.
Ft. tenths
Ft.
& in.
Ft. tenths
1
9
4
9.3
10
9
10.8
1
5
1.4
2
9
4
9.3
10
9
10.8
1
5
1.4
3
9
4
9.3
10
9
10.8
1
5
1.4
4
8
9
8.8
10
9
10.8
2
0
2.0
5
8
9
8.8
10
9
10.8
2
0
2.0
6
9
4
9.3
10
9
10.8
1
5
1.4
7
9
4
9.3
10
9
10.8.
1
5
1.4
8
9
4
9.3
10
9
10.8
1
5
1.4
9
8
9
8.8
10
9
10.8
2
0
2.0
10
8
9
8.8
10
9
10.8
2
0
2.0 �-.
11
8
9
8.8
10
9
10.8
2
0
2.0
12
9
4
9.3
10
9
10.8
1
5
1.4
13
9
4
9.3
10
9
10.8
1
5
1.4
14
9
4
9.3
10
9
10.8
1
5
1.4
15
8
9
8.8
10
9
10.8
2
0
2.0
16
9
4
9.3
10
9
10.8
1
5
1.4
17
8
9
8.8
10
9
10.8
2
0
2A
18
9
4
9.3
10
9
10.8
1
5
1.4
19
9
4
9.3
10
9
10.8
1
5
1.4
20
8
9
8.8
10
9
10.8
2
0
2.Q
21
0
0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0
0
0.0
22
0
0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0
0
0.0
23
0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0
0
0.0
24
0
0.0
0
0
0.0
0
0
0.0
Points
20
20
20.0
20
20
20.0
20
20
20.0
Average of
Dints
9,1
0
10.75
X
X
1.65
At pump
$.9
X
X
X
X
X
X
intake
*All Grid Points and corresponding sludge layer thicknesses must be shown on a sketch attached to this
Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
ALL INFORMATION FOR SURVEY PROVIDED BY R. C. HUNT

C'' .,
i
w
c�
1Q
`M I
yrr [ A
5
� C�
\
i
,..-•.ti.
F
� \
Q
i, 1 i' •�
VV
p Q
t
v
,

02,11.5/,2010 04:22 FAX [phone] WILSON SCYCD 0001/405
M
1 SM Goldsboro Street, SW
Wilson, NC 27893
Phone- 252 237-5147, x3
Fax, 252-243-7713
To Cr NZP� BE ktiQQ-i� Prom 12 t /'c.+/,f — --_
F= ?/ 3� 1 %l _ _{�7l g Pis --4E, induding ouve►sheet
p 'A 5383 a■ew L-/r-rp
Rim ,PoA
❑ unpmt ' I(for Renew O Pkwso Com m ❑ ply. Reply ❑ Ph * R.oyde
• Comments:
��-
f
y.
�

02/1342010 04:23,FAX [phone] WILSON SWCD Z 002/005
.�jl VQ/LV.LV Vi. JL rM iU&AYJl I LJ "ALAav\ .7rvv lEt}VU1
PLATY OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
t~acUlty Number: 35 0Oaa . �rjooaa County:.-- -� 6 in Off: _
Facility Name. ANDaeu1&—flu -r Iz��MS t 1
Certified Operator Name: Q.nt Operator e
1. Current liquid level(s) In inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current fiquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure I Structure 2 Struoture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
Lagoon NameAdentifiier (0):
Spillway (Yes or No): N Q
Level (Iriches): �
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level Is wltinlh the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures, Frye
and 30 day PIS of Action are attached, Hydraulic And agronomic balanoss are within
acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 28 year 24 hour storm. elevatlorns, for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balenca is wfthfn acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site `locations. Volume and PAN ooment of wags to
purnped and hauled is reffected in section Ill tables. included within this plan is a list of the
proposed situ with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop Inforrnatan.
Contact and secure appraxel irpm 00 ©lvislon of Water Ouaffty paipr to transfer of wastva
to a alte not covered in the feellfiyr's oertifled anmml waste menagornent plan.
Opemkn will be pArtiallyr or fully depopulated,
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- If animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for mica reoeMng facility
.: Earliast possible date to begin land application of waste:
I hereby oeyrEity that i have reviewed the Information fisted above and 1hotuded within the. attaohed Plant
of Action, and to the beat of my knowledge and ability, the k tformatlon Is accurate and correct.
Re4At.r G f/u_ Phone.---Z.22-
23S" �`3g3
Faclitty Owner/Manager (print)
isd�.M L C '14wa
Facility Ownerthilw►ager (etgnaturs)
PoA Cover Page 90M

02/15,l2010 0424 FA% 2522437713
„ WILSON SWCD
u cr car LVlW 04,vv ra► .40&+.I1 , av If►iLvV+1 emu.. _Z 003/005
PLAN OF AC"i'1<ON (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (80) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL. PAN TO BE LAND APPLWO PER WASTE MUCTURE
1. Structure Namefldentiher 0Q); dAs7'4'-iA
2. Current liquid volume In 25 yr.F24 hr, storm storage & structural fmboard
a. currant liquid lava according to mador inches
b. designed 28 yr,124 hr. stvnn & structural freeboard ! inches
c. line b - titre a (inches in reed zone) = � � Inche6
d. top of dike suriaos area according to deslgrl -I✓` 3 Z ft2
(area at below structural fineb wrd Wwaflon)
e.tLrn-q x One d x 7.48- _ _ g 5 7•Z-- gallons
12
3. Pr+ojected volume of wasto liquid produced durtn0 draw down period
f. ternporary storage period according to structurai design / FA days
g, volume of waste produced eacording to etruotural design 1 &'' $ 4 2 ft3
h. actual waste produced W-ria ,trend # x Une g
certi'lied herd #
i. volume of wash water ac oardfng to stmcii rat design
j. encase ralrrW over eve *mWn acoordhg to design 5 8'
k. (lines h + I +i) x 7AS x � � � q ! S' gallons
fins f-
4. Taut PAN to be I" applied during draw down period
I. cumW waste wmWs dated ; 7 _ ib/I000 gal.
M. 111n& a k x line 4 lb PAN
1000
REPEAT W077ON I FOR EAGk WASM SMUCTURE ON SITE
U. TOTAL PoUt= OF PANT STORED WITHIN STRUCMAL F BOARD ANi]= 26 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE F,.I..EI ATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRYMMS FOR FACILITY
POA (30 Day) IMM 1

02/1512010 04:23 FAX [phone] WILSON SWCD
Z 004/005
I.
structure ID: l
line rn = /95 __ _ lb PAN
2.
structure ID: _
line m ^ lb PAN
3.
structure ID:
line rn 9 lb PAN
4.
structure ID:
line m a lb PAN
5.
structure ID,
line.m = lb PAN
6.
structure ID:
line m lb PAN
n.
lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 =
_ 19.f lb PAN
111. TOTAL, PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PpRinn
nn NOT HAT FIFI_DR rn WHICH PAN CAN
NOT RE APPLIES 111URING THIS 3o DAY PERIM.
o. tract #
p, field #
q. crop
r. acres
s. remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance
(lb/acre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE
FOR FIELD
(Ibs.)
column r x S
u.
application
Window'
CG Vr t
, 0
ho � 31
3
-
-140-11
'State current Crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving
crops during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) _ 83 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00 2

02/15/2010 04:26 FAX [phone] WILSON SWCD
Z 005/005
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section 11) = lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section 111) = lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) c ,7 rk lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. if line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
Including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. It new fields are to be
lnoluded as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste Is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
WL / '"1.4.J RSTc A�y�Pc frs�� 9rvy D,ox
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00 3

WA7-Ct Incident Report
0 G
Report Number: 201000800
Incident Type: Non -Compliance Reporting
On -Site Contact:
Category: APS - Animal
First/Mid/Last Name:
Robert Hunt
Incident Started: 02/08/2010
Company Name:
County: Franklin
Phone:
[phone]
City: Castalia
Pager/Mobile Phone:
1
Farm #: AWS350022
Responsible Party:
Reported By:
Owner: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC
First/Mid/Last Name:
Robert Hunt
Permit: AWS350022
Company Name:
Facility: Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Address:
First Name:
Middle Name:
City/State/Zip:
Last Name:
Phone:
[phone]
Address PO Box 7038
Pager/Mobile Phone:
/
City/State/Zip: Wilson NC 2789570
Phone:
Material Category: Estimated Qty: UOM
Chemical Name
Reportable Qty. lbs. Reportable Qty. kgs.
DD:MM:SS Decimal Position Method:
Latitude: Position Accuracy:
Longitude: Position Datum:
Location of Incident: Castalia Swine Farm 36.0761N 78.1014W
Address:
City/State/Zip
Report Created 02/11/10 07:54 AM Page 1

Cause/Observation: Directions:
High Freeboard
Action Taken: Comments:
Incident Questions:
Did the Material reach the Surface Water? Unknown Conveyance:
Surface Water Name?
Did the Spill result in a Fish Kill? Unknown Estimated Number of fish?
If the Spill was from a storage tank indicate type. (Above Ground or Under Ground)
Containment? Unknown
Cleanup Complete? Unknown
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft : Unknown
Access to Farm
Structure Questions
Animal Population
Groundwater Impacted : Unknown
0 Spray Availability
Report Created 02/11/10 07:54 AM Page 2

Access to Farm
Farm accessible from the main road?
Animal Population
Confined?
Depop?
Feed Available?
Mortality?
Spray Availability
Pumping equipment?
Available Fields?
Structure Questions
Breached?
Inundated?
Overtopped?
Water on outside wall?
Poor dike conditions?
Waste Structure Type Waste Structure Identi Inches Plan Due Date
Lagoon 1 17.00
Event Type
Event Date Due Date
Incident closed
Requested Additional Information
Report Entered
2010-02-11 07:51:23
Incident Start
2010-02-08 10:00:00
Report Received
2010-02-08 10:00:00
Referred to Regional Office - Primary Contact
2010-02-08 10:00:00
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Plan Recieved Date Level OK Date
Comment
POA
Report Created 02/11/10 07:54 AM Page 3

Standard Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone First Name M.l. Last Name Contact Date
Other Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
DWQ Information:
Report Taken By: Report Entered By: Regional Contact:
Patrick A Towell Jane Bernard Jane Bernard
Phone:
Date/Time: 2010-02-08 10:00:00 AM 2010-02-11 07:51:23 AM 2010-02-08 10:00:00 AM
Referred Via:
Did DWQ request an additional written report?
If yes, What additional information is needed? POA
Report Created 02/11/10 07:54 AM Page 4

t-13-14-2812 10:49 FROM:BRILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278 TO:19195714718
P.3,22
FORM FRBD-9A
Waste Structure Freeboard, Water line Inspection, and Daily precipitation Record
Farm Owner
Operator C el'u�-
Lr43:�-<4
Facility Number - Z2
Month/Year r7Aiv 1 — /C)
Comments
...............
agoon freeboard is the difference between the lowest point of a lagoon embankment ano the level of liquid.
ror lagoons with spillways, the diftrence between the level of liquid and the bottom of the spillway should be recorded.
2. Freeboard levels must be recorded at least weekly.
3. Daily water tine inspections must be indicated by a eheckmark and problems noted in the comments Column.
4, Rainfall must be recorded for every rain event.

r3-14-2012 10:51 FROM:BRILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2279 TO:19195714718 P.4, 22
RMM RROD-1
Waste Structure Freeboard and Daily Predpit bon Record _
Fenn Owtsr I&C11Y.A. Ao M Par! R.' - Zz
w
operatar C Hvnli' C,4&F44!,I
2-S-IX.
Dft
"VYaate
MUMM
spit MkV%
AV
Z_
• �+
k
j i �l
/ /r
tr
27r
k
/o - 7--/
k'
/0-/L-//
y
k
a-12�11
/o-l�-fl
D
1,--3-11
,4 dl
Is/
�c
/Az 3-f1
c
3I
2-
AV-
-17-o#
Z-
etc
A,
7r 24
2
7-Zs
7
•
! /Y_�7.
�y
jA
-
S
s•.
r7- S-rz.
3 /
,
Qc
S-•Y
��
z �z-ry
o
ac
Zf.
AC
�z y
.t
Alt
1. Lamm ftsaboard as t11a dflrarseas baeMaen n,. toires poht of a rspoon ererbanlonant and ttw Iwni d pqufd.
For tapoans with epW n) w, the dlff rwe bobvww the Iwd of t1gl M and " trotlom of the eptlhm ahoutd bo mounbiL
Z Freebowd pW twebbte stomps oapaotty must be r000rtlad at heat waoMy.
3, Rs Maq mud to racmded for -very rain erg M art 4M

€ A
4
F
f if n. 1s
�
@E C, "f i•=:.. gyp{ �€ � t €E` s 3(e , i 1 Er� E€ j¢@€t :I: ,((? I jj7 3d � q_3 j9dpv ja33d7Ey g r1 f �@ I �} C" eg` F s r.E. r� � � 3 I ' f:e (� �.} fpRS'6A,� �9 .
Y
tiF
r f Y d fend da
1� 1 ! �b0 '
6D• tl f6 (1
Rp Cti1 refs
t , if 1 1%k�
to St t
kl f E i Yt 1 .. ,r >
W& s
1 S �36� .tYF 8P % tt �[ t �q
E E 1 r r[{ {� +a:(€EP 1. all,6f8 e`K (I!%
6i t
YE E:PI
t $ ; t';I �EpE > = r3f� iE¢9,;6i 6 iP € . y{Y�.��ENulb9i
}•"..{ rYl@E. $ } 338 YdE 9fgx §$_ .i:.'} Ep 4 xd'i1.Ei E4xii.�.E 3 € $ 9°9i8311E9( gi:E�i�f3.}3K3 3�gK izq�3 41 kF.. ••EJ g .. A { 1 x•fl6°_ t zK
i i!y ppyy $$ 9 ii E§i9319' 6fep;l[f{q Is • S t :iE (p}3;"` Sf' 1 8 pft "6�9e9�°
°
i; i al 3 § i9 ° ! / 3l 1 li, i:i t ry1 .f^f E_ _i} £C 3 1 I 9 " •B; 1 iS f P .F 9 Y i t{ i" Wf -:i i t3 $ 4ga7! N Xiid4 - 4 d ,g j919EE r _:
4�� ���"t,�;°a�iE�.9;
lid i�7€.I iEiSlf=i , I, fdlt/� _€sg,f
i 1ryry1iE �7 I7111��! Ey11! 1 �fll "f l �. Y' i
7
i�il E
° A f :il
Farm,Owrx►�f f �'�
AMA I 1 � � @
nY € II �1��
t ;j .F
i y��-��
1 i `% } 3k • itl f E I!ei`I `r�VMw yyf (j YYdp�t A�E}: ; �3 fl'.K.
EEta L !!f - :Eli i3 i§[s;F } S'['1i i !Q 4i1 P}-,8 R 6%I eE E
E xf} tf }.I.,P,. 1 }EE8 3 i l.jjtt {g' ! t �/N SW
(• : a§1 !-
y s 3 +M'
�$�i�Ei4 4 � 4 � Bde"Bf¥�6° !
�f'xff�i. ff�¢ R.3
3 �-6RiEE � E'E`9 •'@§ ��33Y6 Pf�
{ 3 F vr:e 4 _=
.: yE; a ee,91 vE.�. 11%3iER E � ��€if$' i.e36}3{�.
F "*TP� �Ep BP.oY�6f���f 6. A� B6M.: /�^'
3i
iYT
4r' 4' �.'�}1
r � 1 -':: J % 11 °'��%°I $$'' 1 #J•u4f`v i I' � Il
lag-:E YFI�
fE
Ef+lvq
-i.E-�
ldq..Ip g;
} if EBiB
1 M�.
E ;��5,��� 9i 3� Er �Vi3� } i�i �$� IiA18Eii�19@{@ 8 9ryat
�?.�3T`�3 �
i€ p36Y. 6<$ 1 �4 , ' E E'ri 1 I i � �.. r..EA€£i E{IIP"}: R � . d'EI nljEl
� �v�� �/ ! if �. 'Eyy -.• f�.: �'� y �8 ,R•
!I �r. k rl ( y 1 °t f' t(.•. 1 �l.l'(°k. AK!Ya l l
N1 W ai' ", +151 % :•ik` e� sx �. ^. '� 'xi q
4
p k"v t: }. l99li i -�• E 7� (s{ �� lliElE 1 EE qpt f,€ �� @E€ Ek�°IE6.E !,i`itt €��€fEEiE ��::E ! i!e ,. � LID
&. j f3: a Ua`
I i J� t -3 ' Et3xi}ElCi'EE3 ¢€ 4RS:[ i3 }
"f^' i?
v.NSA,
QC} -VjA•r i ifPf
j
77 {il iiY3$i11t3f6I0` {
i99° } l P E_}!.vy� f
{IIIA i} � �:� ! #�
w I � ,: f t� F y}yg1;1 4 Iq ,I_ I k�Ml : '" 3 IitE / -i: ra� l+� �• _ �,ff,�
r i k. q. { ( �� f�l€ 6•�EF �r�:Y�f fY3 el Sri• 3 1 E �Etf F f
l E� '1'
k IM ki"!'*P °Y 1 ,
(�E Y I 113I 1
;iA,i, p 2} It
-g,6CE!Ehdi ,• } =1 )) 77 i1 �"f ' EE p i � E § (i[b }i�?¢ )?3,j j3j 9 t �1'��¢i �3 2}§iyx3 � It iEFI t �`_'K31$e4f @`i �' .'} F g��SA !� e��l
% a I:)d "'lz> 37 m11 4et§iEd"i:S a� �'
Pli1FEI£jl :'¥}i(i3¥ijg i,.>�ii:l{}�Si�i3ili'
2 177 k (3°E:e EdpE
it t3 1% li 1!Ni's:
F 'S ,E.a
1H1 q Sly
,rs. s
`3�1tyu a AT.: I ��Y§a s
l a v w
q: ���{� Fi �r,��3 i � � k � dr �' f 'k � €M',,[p.i! i ! �'.�l I �� � � •
1.-�flrl i�ift`FYp+i �i i�li :uF b f".F! L 1
};O iiwYG� �r V4lyFS.! -
jl��vup ..E E
1 dp
3 -,1,4y fPp �� i !EI icl j I;l'.
=TH 1:1 I x (e 5f Ee i- § -gk 6u= (]- F! ;@I 4 8 6�%•g gEPj};"Jp 3jp�F9� i "E }i?1{� A C"Eil� I R igi3=,i N @5 Fi d E€yy 3i.f i idE4 96
'fi..§ � p [ifi��6� 6@° j€t€�{E`jE �� E � j{ �Y{p§l§i@� 1E6 gEiJF,EE{'€pf E�¢d.,"@S� �. �'tl^. SEi
t€titi!? i3 " 3i! fitif 9i1E 9 td@BOBt3 1 9 !Y{ C ¢ e P E 0 iii REEfE £ 4 9 dt' 6!E€{E 1 i d i •/i'�" _. i dE88 )4!dl E 9 8 E£ 4
CI 33 5
E { p N i
kl f%I "$'$° 98§ E E 3 i tl .8:. E € ;P E ly'.,•i,E fE f 43 9Y fYl? f t P i;P;ya f?iilli 3 rip 3 -- } 4ii E 1! d E'$ ` ss S°ANit°ot S I I��E:��Y� 3%='} i Kj
p P $ �; - � € i�sg -€ ! i�t n -�: } EY =i' p � j 1i - iE�E �1 � § r24; !1 �i 1`f
�it 0,� '{ (k; a df !� � �7e i �' R {,i � I f �i .9 F 1 'i }➢ i
kl�I
! 1 �€ a
. -. NY
f..li �?, 9 ,py i� I € � �NS�lE >-�K }`I 4. � a.Ff.�,1W,�T
:i%Yt I
YE3'
E li't } i. €1
` t` j s:§, 2
¢
1kE1
9p�gyE gg}g€F6-✓;N 351+&€E-`!
3 E �E ! "k�7 P �'d:,�
fS` Iii{{z
i {I 11 ! `.. }� ! ..
g Y hl -,,'•,
5 !,
,6
a f-fI }
}.. 1�4e•, §�'"-'�
E ;d�iiNi-.
€ E.iteE°°t,€p-,t€zan•
¢:'�'�€.,'
7MflR
` §]i 1'a,?!
N'. t.
f 9
i Ei 11 p y. 6 : 3 y •=.8 d
v E'€e E'yT)'`,f dk 1'€{i:.}i� �g1 E[ i j3 ev °3 a€i i I 1 E.E•{' _1{EhY E.}q.!t f�B @"Q�ee{'PEv f4 €Ei Elf pf FlE{ j. .(f4}}x}§ P ili }"l3333 81i°.?.Bil EE Y }s IfR4.3}.1..! �y j$=?.�945g 9 E i x.`3j3 9d9..@.¢F pp . E€•6 § M1-j}i(S8 Y}£.:� @ag 3$y, E-p1}E
E¢,l - YCs ..K7f}'3� {iii pilrEq�ggggl��yyeyye@d4i`I11.,?�1..li'j{{ 8E Fff E:{{ iii _311 {�a3yy55IP EEs E3'€iSE Y@3?§47f":.E 'iii 3}"b@k :F$5E. ;pjjj{ Sf _ i:uir3.8&`1 s_.: EIE3 _.
lis
d!-%:, 4°le ,.',e.--_�.�i,llw, ,€111d li9: i°I° rla :. PP1i i lr aS993 .#If€i,s EFni.. `i97�.� a'::f�ill-a rE�°7 .7e i 11 �: Ef if f�f:_d s
4iN
4-
:i - L 1 I t I i 1 L 1
91
! t-al �( i Y E '�, Esrt €� f + h� kf }j'-.Y%l 3 iY. ,3€t M ... 1, 1 4 1 F t Etp °'
! iZll. y € }§ SS { jj s i ( 44 I= 1 @ i ii ! ;99 3 �E€6((11 f : �p� `! ylt§ al i@
E E,i" P EiPe'i }E ! b. § :!--,1$-= -
E b{-? d{ i4:s , :t.E:ii E3i! 6[E [1[F..
9 5 ,(�
l Eli%E } ,j{ Fi}..E ti?iE: $3'Ej i tl Ike, ia�';E $ i t7iiil"1EiFl E i ipq�9`k'a.d E i Et19 Ej: _fi °[ 3d jqy°9't:( 9 1{ y p ( p E[ 9} ( t s[ 9 1
qpp�6.:.. {... i ' t! :. EEi�(i SE�3}3§$§xx33 F.}1 ij I{33E E� i;x.Sd eP R Q i' pi.i1�E119SS @R9 3 Sp i8��'EEiEi€'� i €<1F3'i i 4 3d§4Y g@}E!E j€ES SEEAi ";yp E.$ }.fE y{jFE - i�:�K.E ! 9 EpBE E6E4E t !1E E{:^ f 3 t }E}39. ( :: itff•K=.
7E �(k �9 1 EEi [vlii 4 pp 33 : 111 @9 8 6lE Y 9 '... { 3,3& €Fli • 133 a%.4 HB Ey$P61!($i€E �xl if�ggq{f! s s}}Iy S fy I,;.
} YE 7 19 E91 tl) i i E 3 3 %l� EEi{E %)d� E i {{�4l lY �l{ A,;IJEi4g4i, i,
d"$% £@ 1 ii
if3•Si y 3
4 41Y E.3C:3 t ti9 f
r 1! {"Y}IY.Ed
1 1 [ ry v F • si - 111 � 1 1, d§` i tl111 ° ,�:�I:
"� 1 'lf fr f�f 414stM l ?'
�' k}
! t'f p:ti j •h d+�•&N SfI r {`F`
F 55 5 f 1 } LL E i,4 i11 'E
F9E +.4 k € E 5Si 3 ; I�ii i14 :..@} 3 f
,E tiirE t EE€•EfE�e' E t 6._-,Ifj - Ni!€'� } if�y9 �g i it iEs �f�2 i-�iC,E!�a}j y;�+I}iP}.
3E €F fs E
}, ng.:: t Y i:3i9 !, €il . - yrt!
E.. Y i 1 (:I9 9E 3 :.i 1')g�
3, .s,$ Kr€i31 13 i 11:.:43E=.l
i •� '� $€' J� S r {6€. {i[ I.. 1°8 8 qE , p qv, 6Y tope°g9 . @ 9j IE[i14k.3 s"Ili ill q1l
ilyd8 "6?€F: ii:.f'�<`=bE•Eitfi3 :ik<f , iEll �j{- js_i•.E's 3g �' S�691gg i99 i4igi9d.g"'9"A�vq�3 3" !39}�'��. jig s9§l» pp ? fl3 d 8S339F9 gg fiie�,ceBl.§§ 1 j1b 1_K•, I,E 77p Ea':tpaj9- SS(". Qp !. 1
.l�r•t :- % §..iPi�� �3P:i33i�dt��9�iE:$p�ib;�i ii1���4E,1'}�ieE� li-:�i F� i� �@�.� 13�19}Il"�¢� E(p ��11" � §��'33!{j3p E§PE - ilFi:F�t -.z. :3iillEljiCin IE � EkjF €���Ylli}j{ 3s tli}iii%E § °9 . °ill:"t1�11i�;Il�E;ls
iia/$''" fiijlc. 9 i=, t
i�j�I_ Et gd:'R.ECF ,.
S�E -{ 6' 3 4V q� { lIiE3 i k f 5. 3 J p { � 13 f Ei .. 1. i 3i ,E EGF r"Iji33E9 8 an>E iE':'.fa !11 .i ill-:'i E tJ �tll,K l{��SIII:�VI•iii
a Dilit�
ii i i yuj Xili 119 "S BErE•: �,' Ei� tl { €� 6 €}f }' K IYi �.I.ik ? 1�[ili Pyt9lil� ! ! A V dy.c [KJ I #,?,fi 1
b}§ieyP(�'E€S4 F'�i } t[ j?�}4��11€
f ril z 84 - {$ 'f•ii 3F€ i 33'1llEr (l'it
S&c"9Rr
3 6 �i i 3 ie ..tl.@E`E F!{i/ .. ;.ilERIkE Ei 91¢M9¢ '6E!€Ptl[:l
- 4•€!ii E,F+IJ A.
'Yy i �: r6�{1S( {}[{:y�.(. .[ E E l�;`/ /-.-'ts-.I ! E€ (a
I' 6}} i E pp[[{{pp E yy { ? E3d E ;'•. EEiE 1. d t i 7 IEi€Pf § s1..3£I3341&i':�il;i3
E j E i; i1klE ; h� ! Ef} 1: EF El 3 }!.......
Y-p• a eiP @i j7 l' ' / (yyyyyy`4 ,iE J� E 5 9y 6[ [{yllll ` 1 Ed �(t{j j�9`
f{; K -.•P E Ki§§g9i '{ f p F Y, "._ _I E 6. l::ll.. @...
8 l @ l@lt9 1 9i=9� i,.tl pIBEYEi1@E f$$ iM'! 4'
3�93i e
':..�rE`^ 3 £ EEjd di[ "Ylf �331 f S je;e�= tl6YEr((g�€off ER�.; li i
$ e E J: "p Ee{s#{ 3 3yI "rl£f F
44,
s ki • i3 r`I n-t-r" i NI i i.;3 3I 1 N7�11 1IYiI �t9k1§jE�E Ii ip ! M i i - - 1 q s Ejig� d f
`, R& (,f' f iif •i wail+"§pl a f �y fit: i A fi iEliilj�� 'i �!N,3 14 11t3f 13l' M1 i
I- �� + , F�
r
€iRi
A' /w� {
/�, "Wx
t Ft 1 !
t
tFf E * ;`F t I:It G• I � I I '��; ;y a+N I IYA .'� �k7A fY ��•�iH�. lHf 1� I 4 �� v., _ aN .IFf f 4. Ef'
III ii
!I{ {{t F ¢s% E Yf 6p'p}IE{ {��( E[ !
iE(� C -Ef YtM. r6 {E &
ff T 3 % 8 �caM lie4i =S
93E@:f@4
.F',' ; NIES, E Ok'llt : 7€6Ps E.I4Erhl -.°.=
iha "i RP:i? E
It`. @Bj3"' uEp IE I,i -i-'lj a f'. 1��iiE
B�(Y§a�.EPt3.a���lia,.: E:`I��{. -- 'i l�(i� :E sipp 1 1-?,�. {gj q3`� i j}{t 7 j}a $¢ �rEd'.kiE:€31.3r7?ha�•;�� � ?�i�;ltlf i�3�j I .�$ (E rgr�E, }y 3�Q$ ��g�ijE "j., � f�{jj �'i�-j.i . i d;�Pd �7l9t9${i ^.;:fit,'¢ t� ,{a tF'r :f. .
E l} it � 3g@ i €E ii� q{ rfq},jj
En 13.7:£1
))! i j 1p y 1 il.
1 3 d ! Ill.' �f 1'E#��{331��3>
E. fff}s.:f ti�3�3fE1¢xEi�iE���j�.E9�§41 ( 6�I13�Y.^ 33.p13�8j� i 84 �S diPe E P{�33�3vF�i
AE �f7_r1lpS:d=�iaY3§ww81Ep€(PE! y.:fi'I+<' � i3ij}� i3!1 3 i1�3S�3f�� .i S'}E {{ 9 7y'€ tfiEE`d • i {§
i 13 { j_.!y i-.x i - :i'1 iintii1}}j 13
1'd ¢! E A88gpI(E '€�jf�l i i ]i31iH
€Y•i"�k¢M`I
3 {I. fFE�IEjy €. 9f1415iP153£ .€p. v}l4Efld p lIE'-iN 1
=dfBpll{[�l� 4 g "``! 131�1 If: 7 It:^"
S q J Y�[� fi li 719 Ii 1 i 1�,.,,� E S�E E ' i� 4 :�yr1Yy k' +j�§$S'f#E
V° A KE
! W if f l Y.r`�=a 1 f
t mac. art y C �i
d 11 d a l� K ':it KI N JnA N yt
j�,�Y 4 Y liµll ' �f l 4
t.eS�Qn luk�
lil 1 A��loiS de a .� lI..^. d erna`ik f
tf�I
dWit!, noe betKreen
Iti I`9 Foe; a a with ! the
SS pr !`l/l M t! t
.. 3-fiii4! lYl "1 '31{iCI;$ tlill}i7 t",t$1'll{E 1.9
„E the
fS iy 9E}dl.. fi j .'••I ; ! ��"'fIE}P33a. 3.. `� 1 Ix j(ii§q.yh� W l�il 1�(ygYI 0�4i�
FvE
7 t11 VO 8 "•„ @ripe„@°;'E;r ; g�,,��� dl�li idSifilyFias§'a'P: tq,' silti!a..3ili {I��k$i1Cis j9E: 'Q�'�1.4!€;tt;lE€4t . {€P 3€ft€a i :;" i, ,,,:ar
Yl4vi{[ §.j f.'sl� E.61E:;3.a,nii �bielE•�t�:�a{..1 E � a9�VB� QE !i �..i:Ep6.6p „ E
Kai' ! ff .."i tl;t� '.BfSd s u
! �F_i=.k
4 t,€E k!d .
1 k i nitl6t bQ ' E ls$1�1'illBt ilE !tl. k i8fi €pp a aiii Qf t e t 6rKili;= lifAi ajq
01
g r'' tDi 9VBry°rgIT1 gyg �r8Cofded fit ii188f iIEVBe�1/ �d i Y &FIOUIC� •.
f Y hi f - k�.,'� M N` h>i (d pYPi@1
k d
( I' § 1 ¢ifs 4:
f `§; 3i4 'Y
E i aE' a i .! E Er 6 {'t }(i�,ift
f'33 ;. �}E •ill! 1 3¢¢lyfdj�y,�i�$x d 31('EE4 �e<r 6i- � -_ ��� ?.IE (€f��€e314 16 € � A`kp` :E y {pp %$ {' .. •FF .(
t�E4{di_Y'^ 3 F s 6 !.E .K('"' Epj4 I itj€ }:EF �[t` k I •�.i i f>!Ifi i.°i n.P �t , b"Pp[ e 8.8°°°@E B I Y :1' i(. c1P$E Yd 33 E. E r v i" _' 166.$%� I �{!, k I33 � �. {p[{h '.8 � ^iE�vi BF(�9 b�6 pP 6r •'€� r 1 `}-fK 'i fk k
.pq`p{x.Pjji}{$ ik ([{(E '} �K... � 8;�.g3�g999 31 ':Y@i �di+; 9r]E 3 8'}:�" B B)SeyE 93i 3 3 I Bi:�Ei gP���iE s:l.E 1} 33 3q. E p 4 EI`E} 4 3 :y��ii �t`,x. ($931 Nf1,l}}" .�E.E idp9 �%@� jiCi'�6 E [ i L '�'a ��[[�� ♦♦
r �?•1@Y��'`'fY
p9i3.8�
l{§{�
¢{;
`iii,,vvvlll 3,.d�4,N�i?si ?k grE3E1 Et{p$•t�bijx $i„7 e� dbi i" @}.-iid}q 3 P % �' -. {3g -
C h.` SfJdy -�Cy3K r�,iI 3} ;.f�a €;I��r�j
r.l;l`.: •ry
r Ft �l �ry� �I E✓ �9 v- I I"'i" �{�

3 s 8 a + '1: � u (Q:.
Lq• `E: ""'!s
'ISYs
t{E°ia.�
�[z
-<z
�':j.'3. �fI
1".
is�xP�iE;E;tad
I
rv,'�P['�
`li'...R
�'�(�
dr}�{Y{';7a'F8'Y;6i�[p{(("
ih(
g
9y
e.3
,
,{'��
�I��,; xN•gY F E,� - tk t "'� a�s�'�
# rR!.1.�E 9 f
!'�'` H6.,t �iy[�:}1 ".r i�lE
:..8g � pp }^k .._ z} .leE ,_:,,Fr•
E� ,�yy
€
hit
a
: �
1
S_? j�.
€
s
;
j" }_
l t:
t,'tl 6
}, 1 t t ,a:3i.
` y � #a � 6{ : ,� - 2 }9: y}, � E'E
6 }E�a y I E -3i Y :€ E { }'1{ [,. ((Y FFpp
_ t3���. �@R�
l �: 3
pill, �•
l E9't�a. € x6;{t jt§§ , { t�99[[ eF
ryt � k> 99< jjj$$,[[6 : �$)(t#Y.'.4L E}$}31
3�d(i' 1
? �-
�" �
, E E. �
v 1 €
�g�E
�.
^ gpl
( $.. 9,
' 93¢ 36
�39
g j-
E�:€[[ E
A @33
... �
. � I'�
{$39 q
�lly
I
: I � !`
: 1
i3k?3i?
q(
p�9�E i ({.
"dB 9F8 9�yY -3,
�:€.
y!
�3E9
.y
,
-§E f.lE
'�
i.
{(t
{id
- �i�l'
_
��de� 9
3
yRp$'p>� ({
;:i:�+
1
€�
y,l'►k;-.� h �-f6ll 1`ft��ij�6 -
': i , �LixE ��+i- � � [ . �li� S`t ¢
[E7 N �.3 eIP { € 1 lE F _Se.
: 3 .�� � BS � � � �
� �.
�?
t ,�€
'E:: gB?i
{p - .8 ."
cP+ : 3 IE§t£:F EI" iE�:
�31
39i1I
.
iv�le'i?F. tx
Y} �€. !
o-r
tq !' 'i iii } ::�z1:8, . (t 1i�ll
�Y(` � ' - •`�:3 qE>-B E 9� t j { -
�
......
(N� + Va
`- � }(c+ �k � , rNpi �
r=� � 3 i> E - Fi a j�3
€ 1�I
` fjY
�'i '
j:,� Y
�
q[,
k I
is i>
,{.�...:
?4 s$ t E,i
j[5
5:;
E
...f
_ _t
F ' ''
F< : tk .t£
�:. 6
. ; � [
°i>{I�
F
", wa
r^EEh f°' ,� 1 Pi:• t F i s�` �+ r �»;.:
�� i :':i3 Er..l1{ EF1"- 3 i •�F.
iY
6j€ dN . I t{: i to ', i7 P E •(
i
§'i gdi i 1 I I I S' 3
i I'1hi T 1^kl tll�:fi�y
•{�3£ x ". ' �1 j q? i{ i3�tg I
, it e i t
iq ) ) „ a ri tt
i�r �t
p i{I
F. -:.
j
v�
E .
°g 9
{'
t}T;
�:I,7
�,
d4j -
c{F : i
11d.y....
3Y{ :
i�
:15. €'�-
73 ;
�.il
B,8
ICI
PE{<E!
lg
i{
R'gk�i
`ESp
lil�'�
e <E�t
Ei¢1
.y99d11
3
ryl
�
', 1
XL
I!
€,'.. �'
d`.P
e[t'
E1E
gq ° E . E -E 4(t{ 111.' E6
:: f SIF �gi 1Q1{ 4e I,E #-
y �Q
i ,� j; �'`
`,
�!r
JAI � ➢� rhl g, n
`
:�
� � g ' '
4
a V
-
{a
N
f -
},
'I,l ,.'
py}kNE3§@ii%
n� +#t4
1�11
� "t
€
!
Q
�iE
��
3
}.. iNk,
w � ��
a.
41$Et
��t.
qV
St 4
�
Er[
4 i
g t
���f m I }
ff
i!'
Ei{{§
FE : ,4: :Ep1 ` g ' .. i
o�
4 Y II Joe
°', -.'S ;Yi.
gl {{{
;iEl
3 'F6
f�:
'p9&E?4
( i
`.`IESI'
if:f
[[ 1j
`j
t [
g i
gp¢e p
EEBES B,(p
§§7
-�
3F1L" Ei
1'4.€-::
�i
, ,,
S ( €
�-. fill
`£ !
@°�¢$[�.6
Y
I
i!`f
.'?. 161
-•:£ :
(j�
`I
f�,:-
.;fir
s •: `Ar
' �IX �P6 1l
1 wB�F A�
'(j '.': I E ¢��[
I ��x ig
�1
3
P
3G{��°.»!.i
I�1
::p.e
6
e�e
fg
@ $C3I9.
3'ifl
� -.
g?[pi'j
..4E
3
-l€3.�
} e .36
E@ 9
qq� 3 � J
:.
a {y9
��.�}!�
�°83+
))7 9
1
3$ 33'
SEg
- 9v
lx€d_9 i
7
��i.
8zf - d§7..�3
Y§
E E
c6+ P {t E �
.I
I -.
i ,
�� ��
pl l,t �wIi:
4 � 4j- 67_. q 3 E
P:, " lisp
,
k tt' { 5 P .'j#' Y £4$ r
1}[ � ..'�. dAEil',. E � 3�+ §Y1�3 " :
� 4 € a9 E
~ �iyi"
'ss'��;
§ - jjj d9 e k i .• 3• '.gi.
Eggpptt33yy EE, Sj I. (f , 'E q:. F £ 9� jdj{ 1L tb
EE, C ,§?¢.. q 3 �L � 'if9°tE i$
1€ € 7�i -, - tlliy
3{ I1 W91
[y(}�"iij
1g $.(�{ F°tF:
9: 9:.8 q 1, i., j' 9 e°S+ :.!
.: Nil
g7i9 g:€ IV s3}x>, t! §9 �$. ��
t{ [ 4 � 3. 14.. ,
? .3 F:.j>E. f<ill E s�l By�3 d<B.
4
g I ,
:�la
i�€j �
tF€i �
3
�: E
y@i'S,,
} .yyF
_::{:
F'
j Ei .
>. 9
3)93$ �.1
2°?}ice?;
t£
j#{ �
&lt
{ . t
:S $g
tl �i�
F ' q}
{ y
y.,µj.
i7
�. �...
,y€
`
,, ('1�
y}'g},�> iiEj
i'iis ,j�z.:......
q, `§ E�3
, qP` iV...:..
It
iE °X .
?kF 1
:{t{E3{{ 1
E 1
E3 $ .
yY' 1'
fd€�t,.'33i
,w1E
.j}
I k?."7
�(f.� S
j( i,
,�F.E
.►
it
. 3d,
€j4i:
l a
E
( 1+
�� >EE
�.€ >g
I B4 �
Y� i 7 g
Yjj{.9E3 §tl jj1
4°I
I
SgS�
:[ - t
6(�
i0f' tf't
{'
� 3 -• l l,. ,
1 [
''� [[�( y '. is 1' >[
iltlj.'. C:6uE E: F 3,11,, (.. dE a KL>,
3 i E.. y ! txt. 3 ' [ F }�xjyi I [ § 99�"¢�
�. `E §q i sL (? �§�.. �1 s 9 9 � S�� i��±�3 �iS{§9° .' I.
-Y ". ilY d 6q€E 13 ':.. E _"3 y
#{ 3 `;
1
:} ..
�N € tln 9 t E 1 .E i
id r SYk
d i i II qq' E .`4' ..
f S E E .+
'S I '
3 ii
a E 3
4µ$
t 91
kd i
i 4.e°h
€
II
N
E,,
d
}
ff ;vtl.R
3¢I i
AFt IS}
ir.
a
y>9l
c: el
'qi:•, S
� il
iF, `
. F el 1
�� if"
[
.'�yy']� ��g}Ig E€ _''YY#{
;Ip 3^e E
. f EF,i 1 ! 3 <
i ; E i 3 a ;, z� E ' 1 ,
1 E 4kw r I g •' '* ".
k q
c
€ 3'..? : rI1 t f - t ,... III
�. E k Ej[(p�y,��.§'� nkII € q-: g-EE.a�.lill 33
E
h �. r. r
qq
§ �!
P¢£qE i i 4 1 _ [�y
tt[[ r Ei g
!
,e
((
'.IRMl
ie ,y
.
'
!
6 i�
��
�,
I
P E i
3 }}
r s
'6F �;
3,g.F
�
" 6
9q�C?,
A
F
"I
t^{
E
{E[$
'I
71 g yYg.:i A
N. dk _{l°: , , F� xa '�.P
1
�'�..`71
', E T
c
gg g i {•' i .€;Il, : R [
§(j„[��{ 9 A IrfiEE tE liE@i!.j[. 3,I". §c{Y�:...
934°r ??
§t.E O O'1'o O €,O
tlj�iiii
B@s YY:
? 3c:3 ,F'P FE `. �� �'+il
x a }:.. , yy i a„4k B ,. ,
{ g=§ 3 :ply l �
,.I
:
E ,1
i II
(13},
'
339i6k
a E E
t::tE
a.
"� 33
(}�
B k I
q �'
. II
} 1'f.4gg
?2y.°§ §�iA
yla ! q, £
lilt
i
9ry ,i
:}7� S F
s;
i �.. 4
�I
"1 E
.
� �
t
1
`fl.°9 "i3l
�c:£,. ,
„At I
�It3
t g
}Sl
g:.g E
':86 4 i
B+E
: q
E� j
:g ,
E
9 F :
.,[:"
PP i llll3 e.6 I _..3
all �
i M y l C
-�"k"„ !�'� E>E° ! r AH.jk1•E � g i ��
EPSjj(+. Yr Ft@
� §�I� E � ua
9 �j �3 �
4[
9 f
�f
{
-
O
��p
^g'N
1
O d
@P
Ol
E6
[xl;E
w�i
�{y
,�
�. # !
j'ho
y I
t.
k. - r. k k
'I d
t.
gq'1Y.3 � i � � ��xy¢¢�
'. �. ES 9p:pBq sa14�� X} . �.,.ibE.E.E 1111• •.. �43�39 9: �
i�§+ t€
}
�.t:3.$@
EP4y: €
II�€1
,dF BBf.?,6{:
gl�l�,
t6 P€
' 6�} i� Fjd,
fF
ti:t 1yEgXge
€,
16 ia.j€y . Rf`E4' g£ 1 9
h9 (g4 rag a is �p �'k'
Ik r
I � i � .i �
h E��
i 1
k�
E X
�}
r
�y. ;
YVI'
I
�'"
N
^+
V 1.
�_�
a EX >i
a''`•� 1� Y '' i 1 lt '.
M q�
1!SeF�" :.S; ,rii1+' Ik.it, ��(-,_i � iTi'� ��I w#i
jjj S''Y`ry�� iF,{y(y}' l���e<e t, .; �! d§.e!(jEEi€.3 '� a
1'.. ]: � . r 6§ � i .' II 68 ,EI, i : �° 3j
ff'"�`} '"J3pI'3: �jk E�.t�E
E :y., i SIE1�!{t I'1£(
3,�E, t{ :E,
@�� �F �i, £� €=¢t t�
9 E i. 1.,' � i,; . b 3 k,
l+,A
?.Ei:�
I }}``E
•1..�R3 f�'
.rA.'.
i :iE}i'
E_.
�E
-::::.E.
:�►
S §'7'
ezYl
. •§ES
JE
t£i
i tyy.
�� a
til�
��
.i
Y..€
�Il�
.a gai"`
I99
€� €Bbl �
�X S
.►
llg
-►:
s�,§i�:R•'
j,, "f
:}E
�
!! }
y
t s:�:
�
;` '
la ��
It" iF '�I :r j ,'I: I t k: � [�`'.
;E. €'i6 .;6E3 :,: t'. 1y1{, EF; 1Y(j -E x1s£ f H°t.
r } i �fl i�i��p': i� 9.s$ t
Y •F - M
�
4 1N;
�
§}R .�� 7�1,
;4!. ' 1 '�E
s t{. kS E�Yyi 6 gE } IIII€'
..I.ii
j ��I-, 1. 'a�° Ile• € <.: Q,E?g .€P kE ''$ Joel
€E: li � ", i P : {•' �, .t,
3 [y .!
3j y ": I', p<p[
t$
ipelj ..j €y -a"S§
IFt> > :IA �
';4� 1$E��j} 4 e €�
� e a P 61
s =2l C
g3 YN° -: met!
i �€{
elf;
!.:'
I ,
^'.
Eisk r3a
€' €y
i4}et
6t
(k
@7.��'
1..
':.
gI} _
i,.
I,s y : ; l
y§� id
1�£�§�
-...:
I g i'
Mai
$t�E
I{ F
11£
Ei
�R�
�y$qP�g
E,P E
^s
dZ. i°is
g a 81 �
gl
ff
+I!€t€
.�.
-
[.�-Sjy�i
`.p;,t
�
�Z1
IY
'��
oil
y' I tl �j,'
A , ,"{J{J
- tp� §) 1r
Mw - -
y
l
� �. k�. gE i€t
A C
si
!-�':
I:€F F;< ✓fk } ° 6 l
YX }_
j +FF vvF; Fr, BE[( } B.€ jq .. €�
! 'i E r E',. {£E
1 i pp ��t a sl 33� k '�y , ,
y s E3(¢ E } :{ : s� g§3, 3 (gp I epr I Eq i s RI ::@.
won
k# i rx ,
�I " ,t,& Y g € �4C€
}:. , §"'. - (Ekj € - ;:'a) .;t , l
t[` [ a �. {L I a:.§
,((fix II . �s.SS{{ ,
lI[4.F, s.}4:. Ej 1 {{. Ix{.
i ag
, f:
"
,``33
i l,g
€ - .:..,,,`
6'
II P
l
, E
}ry
$ CE `
g. +1
E d
k}kF _
i
ii
,
i 't
:.
- F
f�.€�
A§
x4 ip#`t
7 }tp'e of
sum E °e. °f
g _I
P
�18§{,:
+s 1. €
;Eii,+ ,
g tly;
3
€ ai
e
f6
II d'
:z
9 E
". ev t 1
eaI s }
y
€ §XY€
"fir.,
j
1,
i i [
�).{�
'"... @
[- ;;k l
€@. s {
.`3
i p ^g. r' -.t
`yi ^w$€ '!.i
!ligg% § et {,t !{I ,( !E3 , II ' dz
6 : 9 ,€iip s j
: liE -. 1 dt
I
i - stgi !ig 3v 3t4 {i§ l LI��iE77.
;I.f lil - EIE jj��g q} }} 11 6 ,(` E �?:j9j'E-Ii
I!{fi, itt� F E� f
Nt4 g t I Ia ] € 1 y. 'S ��' �
'p`� W`ia d h i"
ran is i
"fry
sih
"�
t
�M
E��+
l
9i.�@99$,j j
�y�
E ..:...,
a _• '€ {.
4- <i
w:�i • E
f 'tt�`A SStt, }:. .,Fr. .l 1lEiE 1x3'. (tLN�E kl[3f{� 14.iE r'�g•
III:1 l 1 &'. " eX €t El4 - g.725 3 I ,:^i ifx
§1 r a{}gi 191,:R El i. i :.1 - .l{i
€ ,8!i
£ y i(i 1
'��§
.g Il
g�j1t3 9 @ 1Il 6 {
i�°-,!{It kt
et$ iA ;:''_i. �jl�€6I"'
,.>.l 6
E,pe�
I E,Y.El3
E : }1l 8 }.I@ s.
II }i 6,€`I'i
i
, 1;9§
iq 6B
YE°F
o
°.844E
I' A
.IE>t€P€gi<
O I
S
O 'E
Ek6.§ gI€
Q ¢ ,�" ::,
t
tF!(}.€€b...y.p.
ica�"II{I!§II
/�y(r
'k.Y{H; D MStl'ti}
€ F)('26$
1 EF
��9, ��9yh!ill � l € o;° !o"
a o a o
o o; o E o
a
;�
oM q
}�� and i 4a.»� � I I '. F
tl"X -d� F
.M hiFy 1 H
��- i r -}I V i Bg e E f
kila�
g�k Y � � �;�
�- •L az
i (Irl¢ {?`§§
,.
L ly.
i'
I. �
I '
€ .v cg
�
i . iE.
gNit: Y
Y
y
1 -':
((�}�p�y,}y
r �tiil
t.
�
12
g E
p� E`
,� "
i
5
diki�E9
§
4}E
{
jl
l � � }•" � � ga. �-a{
W:O
li ��;I ; ✓', °F':.
��
ii }il a.121,. yy((}}ppyy i 93 ,q9'.a .(iEf I€ £ F g.y3.l i
FY
k gr,€ '�@ _'� (.;'{i
Sjx F I6 € e ({H+
g
( ¢' i
I {{C$
€ Er F'.
I�i g
i ".s
jY i.
�:I 79
sq P 3
oval
d$
3�:
� 3
Y.
§.Y.?33
is
Y{;,
(j
i9 i'.lgl
§E -
°i1� y
- 1'
i:: 3Nki
d€
{
S
F
8°•9
��88 EI
q1 • t
�r
�: § 3E.
tt €. �� .
6e i §
EL
f (EE
'8111j
I r;E
�gg
�3
ke3p, Ff�g3F _�. w .
q$�� .- .}i ;WI i
4f 'E p{ §}q 1ii E ^ ill.3>E�a;�g S dl.
':E. E::°D i.
hi !1 3 € § A3
1yy
ds �
AA
{4§ .
`P g§j
i E$
Y t
FiSgW
,gp;
€ Y '
I,Y, ',
'
¢
f
i',91j yb
y 3
t
E3 �dti"E, I�
:
iiOieSTIR
4!r�IM!�,
'i€4?1e " ,+Y I,
.r.fi.3►,�I
:
��i at� s�I �ayy
�j�9 4 ;{{``
.�';;', Z,..E€ �,ilYY:ger"vklEE :�� . }(e(!i€E �e€ggi'se. °, .a t,? �-sstjs. �[il °�fr,g tI F
s
N
'l 1"
�§ �' �€
.I
£
l9
: } I.
?
:
1
�gyl3
<
3
("3.
i €€i3'
y(§p� $_€
3 3
3 3
}
$
�}
?g �-
'.8913E
I4S. • :i
ti✓I
'. �,ii3 §.
3t��666)
Pl 1€.
(gl q�,, E�,E1: 9 (j' �� €� Eli �{ �": �<. . vI3
3 a}I.
ili'i4
€ , a
S..
, l-
Et 1
£g CR �!
, i1
lt`t
.la „ {y
+@ .;{I , F !.I'..:' rid',. �� y •� � f �
�
{Nr1,Y
�
k;•t
�, ! fi. 1 tl
'€ �
Y!
d
Y'
k«S!'
qlf 1 -
r ,�
'�
E""'
:
i.I�''
r i, ql ti l '
i
�I
�6t
I'e
X
°`3� i3.. (L .� F `{.�<EE�,[
� "3� is. eig;; lrlE 1y 6: E§, :
l �° ^€ B s., ���E�
. a tt �(Et8y . ,
,;ltb,
j�{@
3erF
i,�'
I
ra
I
,�Y D F
N �P
fll�
i«iqt Y�'"�8:`'e>�� 1 �
§
y�yv�^�{ iE
_g@{i: s sl
Fy, .: .
E
a
.,.
jli1,4,if?.,-'g
�e' ,��
$3&5➢ y'.(BFt< .�(}?t,.byi€S- eEes'4. f 'F Fi.�>i IiE3
E Il
g}Ft
...i��F�
f
ut
oil
3
'(. .,.f • Y tlg tl .. "' 33 14k , �{{ 1
4xd3
€eEE`ig,4j, iE31 ":i. a1 i 9j
:xj,,'s
!
iilt
!( :'31,.
^
:, E.
}'.
�
§>
$3� l
.
1 Fiii. 4} Y(a §E�y _ri�iE . i{1E!}. >I ,. h9(Sj€,fff E
- � e:'�t 1 =v E•d
e'11 P €9 9•i
1#
- �! fit. qj:
°i i,
1!
1
S-:§
1
:�{4-
�
� p01
.. I
i, .
'�
.. a
(fI1.;
1 Il
c4k_
�,...133.�
:�) i a Y{ � f��3 d:,E i, ,E Y� _i try•. ,.
ro
I €€ qq
W4R
§44
IlY
dl k
},
P
€
3
V
��
(
S
qie.�y k
l3 i
•t 1?,. j: i E6 fli € £j: 1..aE
f(pI Pp�as � ' •=
9 '
���1�Yq�
i
i
" 6€e `�;Igft�'I+t;l
1 EEEPoE
it , i
<IE
t
� I`
€ . qlx. -
t?Fi 1:iilii�1
.kit
a
�?''�9���.
-XIB:??it:i(j
Y3i� r
3
i'gl7€ g ;
i 'i (€
YF yq
!':, 3lA„
�' .
e(ye: i;• i a$1'
` =kNK� �9
,1!£.(,` V
•,ik€,
ri{f4.Ijxq{
ti' ;, II�S€ki:a
l�'i�R- i:`•'3fl`i� EjtlP: ty' Ex i 3 ipi
qs�a iig° E #I (?�Vi,1 � ,:.>;���� !� I ::;.�
ggl€�.tYr�i
lV
tli'g�XN��t,•���p;�f
��
ki
'�k
t
-�{v;naa.�E�:i ..
��S�Y���!
..,_., {; g.'%st3-.�rli{{i e?6¢�Y��3(g1�181��I
q�y1�y¢� !� g
jtS$!€(���Ss.spi�dj°ie9�.�E
g�?F�§6ai�§��c4E€.�€
€1t(Iit€Igo"..-a
:aE I"
.1'{k."§S�$a}�<P
t{�t�'�`�'�*ti'
��FI`":•
f fykn.°,

r —
Yam.
FORM.,!RR 2 � �� � � � - LAGOOWLI - UID°IRRIGA
7110 =F1ELDS'REG�IRD-:-r
36227,��_
3:4t- s - m
�iALiA-FAR#A� =
_�-� = Tairr�.3Lhvr�r.�:-- Andre►vs"tlurjt:Fpmts:'/.:Castage�� ..��_. _ _ �" --- ��-- - '
Irri r _,�=r RaliortC HuriY - -- ";' >r� ��. � �.
Address 23 Casdinat: rh►e Wlisor►�-NC: 898- _ _ _ -
Box;908 Haifgy, N :27807 = — - - _:
Oper i? icne = (262)`231s 8383
-Phons
_:"Carer -. - rY ter.:
RecomfiWs PAW»40D
Fi -..
- _ -
..«:.,mm ._.ems:...
® a:m - :: __.... - . ..�- -"' - a :--a-i. ":.3:. .�- °' °"F'. - p''-_.'.r.,. .®.m.m .e.. �..
- ��tn+m/d. r) �m� . �....-_. a � - m � .of ��.
c► -thrt T1me .:Ered:T# �Tota1 mFn nk a
.4
-. � tirh�n� sue•. .(Gana � gaUAcrel =: t� �B�gai)� ;tbrt�iej � ��lA�ia1 � e� � _
aaw to = a V ia�Arfa, :sait�man"
Lagoon �ltL�BIRFFD9 P-B- t2 .= Z4fl 1:_
_ r W
'Et37 ��; 25fi&Q .'
�..- M:.
. La oon-:9a/2t12008 =8_ = 52:,_:Z4#1 ��-_ `€',:
_763i.--•._-:
1Q7_ "' �:1 T=� l3•_�. 14 -
_
--:.; ��
=2 _. _240 ., =7�
_ __2S$80
_ �. iET7 ,=-=-26680 � i �;763� �� •1 � 13.=-
goo -
�• � -6 --si 1'S ' "� �. WWI 4 ''�..-
62�..-� -:
-
_ ..-� ..,,5, ».. - � ��
��&^-..^u.�c
6 s
S3._.'«»
�.«.«.-- {I.�
(xwo.:..„.x''�:..
S'
i
/�:'� ..:."w..me -,. a.:.
a Lagoon.Y
C
`- •:-�- ';R.s°' 6..� --..'a - ..m.�., "a'±;=�...,,.•`._ - :� ^�" `.. i�
�- =- Lagoon -� - � --�- Gx � � "��
�--�' - 0: � � -� 0�• -- _ -�-� =0 - B2 ---�ti
- _
8
a
OEM
a
- =
e
goon
_62
wgg
�. -: �r.^"' _, :,`"."."'','" .- ... .E! '4F _.- .««'"�...«.
_.,
,�-•s� re.;.,--':�' 'c.-... '4.. ��1'"`vg, ��-_�;.:��t..C..,.'.E»^µ «,:d
�:# fi -
yyYf_«.k' '�.. 4
' N..;»L"
_

LGLGUID IRRITI�IFIELDS�RED©RD FpR$!RRZ R
=— )
a _.� n ... _ _ : _ _sue �-. :' . -�• ,�
' eTractli.88W
-�- m ..� ��.. _ > � �,
Field 8s
i amn-LrWtf tldrswa.►f�nt.F.ar�ns9trO
Ro}�ert G iSoNnit k x
W _.., .: m:
Addesta = P Q Box:B08;Bi NC 2{6i77 _' . -
gi'� m
Addresses s 823�Card[pal: fclve Wf{aon l�iC 7T898'.; -
P.hone'(?51)°235-0033 -- ' a' ._
f�par,ePhone (2S2)-235-f#383 . e x:� g
Crop Type cc+re� `'
Reaatnmed PAfV,
- -- _�
_
!g UA-.m) (lbdt©Gt)§a� )1l iAcce) 1 'ki.. c l
"�: f.YNui souireW ry 7ataf marry ., ....
Vol 2r AC���, Ylfasta Arsa �:�Pa� 1►bn ,>Nitt
�: _ .^A,' ..'^.= m�-yam:_ �e3 ',..--1Si`(; "'$.®.5<'.: -"'>'" ^"3• ". ..xT..'
Lagaan <?IZAD442 '
:Dt".'^'s^'�..`.^.«'..e ..........:. .,...+"'.3 .: �:`..'�'-!i +x-- ': ..h
»8.
Lagaon 1.71ZS/ZD08- m # ::_
.mom _ B 41 7;00 �_ ;1:.
=-
107 .: .18260 ....,'
>>_� Lagoan -=� � '� � "� = � -• �. p �' � 4 r
€� �Q �. 4 _�--� .� ..� 63
_ � . �
Lagoan =
Lagoon-_
P
agoon fl
- 1 a
-.
oorr n F-
-.-. _ �0-�`- � 1
_0
� t) mot._ O..r� �i ---� - D
�- W m
��
to oon A 1`
t °0
tag"oon10
";«;� ..
""' a-^• ♦ _. .:.:-.as,x.?. s Q e: a�`Ci �
f#
[ z,:..
�`.a�:"�� I.:.�. � ��: , �_ ...s. �«' _.
- cYk-�,'� _:
.�. :.:--�^,..
� A
-- - =
aon M _
_
0 - $3
f0 63
, 0E=coon
a �_ a
p
- -
-
43
?Y:".+' y�
- �. � Y.'" '.a:•''�'� ,:. � - �
�"C�:
C_-'f"' � { .. �:'4.�i�.r � ,� 4
�,.� "^:'k�
�'-_. °4:"., � �� .• '.- m. .».^ .9 :.i."5. T�..:...�5':._m....
Mw.VMi7 •XF '; .^,:%�%1:^ ^M'S-'4, .i a d. �.. Pw�"°:w '� ,i,y� 4_.5" .: "'C k«,"�..tt'ft....:
:+;.� .i"�`'.
e..�-^q�.4 "".:_`w . '^#
13
F,---- .�.,�,.A:»t -== _
_
-
WE
wMon
�i/Vif
O
�- -
-------------
M

� 'f
|
#
; \!
4

7111
4
` 5,tZ,
...E+1^l 6 � �li I `3!' S 1�' i { � !� €s�3 t;�;�LA I4�E � �g49E•f 4 }i# a � ' ' y�i € S {* E:{�i ga r E
P9i.11;1prj9¢ s¢AseE sa9oE{".
l N €lll is y&'fi#� 1�yylB 1 , ij it
an
np,1 Mgr_€ h,t �flt=c aE'ktE !W•gg,aH �ln pytf iC
°stir Eri9 at,.i$ga?I;€i spa 9iEiiEE a�419�
+ ° �Et
4 .r .. pp➢ x I X ° s�X {r`r f'� rE I` ! r ` §
',01 Oh!r
1 r 431 11=
nrC7µ N k i h
! � !! :3 , t � a ' d �InitieEs�: �rvll gC +r'i�`Pk ck hl t
9: E€r. iti#ixa° # Stetx�ure orb
.r - . r„r :_• r try'u]] _
r {{v. r� is },: 9 1. : ' �.� 9�r 9y�ygg;,k�§gg$ %_j � ]. ii t ;1;�` _ :''i li€ ;•g k,, i y jj
o i
¢!' '! " yy"t a�}! .�E „d
, wi =+ li€ r #9 # {!� t.. =ti# R' '€s,, $€, € E?+ a €#€i,ia T. €=r
� ryaw a## 4n r t .11i�j'
•. � -. a - / � E ! 1� a t a � t cta 7t€€s•i�atu n ��, E ��? i = q 9lrgrw l �r �X � F �a I l 4 t5 °� : .y
k.S1°It.aki3 :'i9 rl°P E"..,€!m kt?° %'Mic fl'flp �ij{i
j 'Y ' `;, !, -t$.7 I i g" '.i` i .c q,'., i •y.:._ 3 44 ,t ! 3.J + Y , ` ai -.Y4
s tl <�*. _ }, vyyi it,.,r r r •r,,..:r:°ar i �`' !
• ;6to'4'� -€ E3i" a} [E iv:r ii{ _rE-X ¢9 '. d a 6i ! t`E61
i t, tlr i rg f�j]�y !! p. S i,i! 4,aP¢{�d
ads _Xr• 3 g;il t r tt �r �s k-; i iIei' ;t!{�,"`p
-'$•8 t {s °]iE'$.. (t f sj�'! ]itFo ' `$i t{9j j#EI}t { ^,!" aj4ij i�sr -:°. E; i § '.w: e€ i 97P '., €(j14€#;"�k"€i}E`i&;1 °;ti.;l s X,",P$i{#11 §_:]. '9s€N ; I 4.?�#itli�lpj
9.,�199 j tl ffiic�
I= .i�4� ,iE1a,4=€r,x3§6€ .!nta:4as9 j f s j3af!9y d EtE.. Sa3cr,SiI arr 7X Y' '°. .x, e E' - :�. ?' .! E -�� f9 kY.
�
1 ] i, a tPf tl" at_3�"ra -] i t x. It i t;
Fyn= r 1° Ya{ ' ° td§ '�¢Era.•*:a $€#r Lag is 6¢tE+ 4 dt s
• a _�,.. ��� v+ .� i€�" " E.<�,< w� � r r " � tP V :. to � r� Ar'F t; �y] � d�E ' �+i13.yL'.�'�� {{� try }°: �A 77.
<
'. ''}}� �" h i
tq i E i
'i! .ii ; s si...�g3€kit
��$€tl I ?n%ii� Y ABi,d jtS 4 jd 84!# rf{<;Egtx!
i3 a a sia € 4 t
' v
{ 99PP {{77 { EE
fi
I �ii lli£ k � df 9i'�}re } &j �j I ° § €}rr° ✓°,�4l�aiEB �! ;i'i6ira��t: .#r ' E 6 l 6' : i1Nli?
,n i Y
}P ,? n c ,s,Y st iEir 1P1 a: a E zi9in i3§'s 3E'stag t; € 3 6 -. 4i 61'i.?s.v to,
!
F 3.. 1 ta{ ¢' f dG :
� �61
-;
G Iqf""t" r !! [ €< -. ,. d. ] -ii°° j.§9a r 6':?li i E t€. .1, y -N ,`. S$,9°'
It
K??!i�
.;zpt
4E.b-.i
:! ; .€ E r P ;' 3tir1 9 3 ,E 19ge I EWE .
r.sr 6! r! � f tx� zf s gE s l° ES ({
;y��° r kf l 14a;..;; �.. g, _r � '.-avi44ii�i ij+.i'.r �r § Y' li'I�i'{N'���:1� i:`�" rrk wtl
k t cs: 4alli3gis: ;tst l � � $9 I i, lSii9
f
TMt YRi?I'%, a P°[EE a. f.a t --."e !!. ..:n � ,.'�t},,E,Et99,,,L �` i °� .�E "' � ' k{ i]i•E #`�"it�tjZ`$�€�'t'a lE3gd3� Es
', i$a r
F" j ja t yL 164 d11r1 . t y �^ pP j 3
.ir..S.6 gr E .. i,t^9s,r1�l�'j�4E9�i f..#5F'ij..<I,tta#?{h3€�fii'',.crY CFI; rE j. ?t "`qid. v!`9$ip11Cy aliti!�l,5`jE i''i{°6'BFtq�1, !i !$' a ""tv r;jgvt�31, aBi;
� 1lS��m`A" 1 µ s ie33 ,Ihiy, il##3.. y {i XgjfCi ?§olE 1${E iil�!'$ E}. #YA'iajw"E' i' 'S96' i' iy°6 9 d i 3 - 4§ .N i66 F, 14§i:i§:liF}333i 3�9 jj' i d338 49 ,1t' i'i }d.
-- , ';' r yP" 7
. !-': 'i t .:4,. �, �,! .. {,: , latS4va:3l l i ijE$j & If .,! l El EI
i 11 '(
do{ t1 {
' 14
bk,tsalg4�
-TON
°€
i S/vW Psi `uE@ •ASKAA§`§a� �al�n' k §I
�S I '
v
!E �S j `jR49, A 1 , .y;,lp P j' i'" € .€�L.g; d 1 Ei i - g' it i
rf ! t , 9�s4" ._s.i�i%i s t 3 lis{ri, 19 ! k;; !g ! rgg9,44 31 , I I !t
5 i+19l - i{{E, `sw- r§ y r .li jiS §s iY�}� li�iFl
i - 't ` r `µ: h f �,' k vgr_.. 1{ *� ,;i+kE
9„��� } E N.
q p }
4 " y9,i t agitl n i t6r `IE 1gj° 1 zg1j p i ?
1u t ,i: a .jltii
} ].,..,S "r • '{,. .r. E' ti,,n,4 .74a€++rr g P% `!yi�� ib°a
; ,=',, ri . .3$ $}L$ji-%1?li7jP{ri9
j- ?i
��r..-•s�§.J.,1
UIM{4'
!
vE s°
,
j § f �� `§'.is�f�, +y $
nY., siv"+ w"m
f WW����t., , ,3.c 1$ µ�{, �. 1 a '' 1'49l, ➢€�a111§� i t �
;: . ui9ty 'r& �R j, f a S ° F V 9 re Y §
€;f� its }.,{, cs must;lrt_; ilavet�<laquitt}"+ S t l k�lN ligelid .: _
tstare" g x l {
:i-r "i�'�' �0.$8�9 t'� =i?.5 i .'":a j i`TF�flr3�!4,y+
Jbw
s $ ap 1: ,; y i !i > =. { 91
'�1 }$I11:'..r;,a 1#�" I�'.:iii ?*7l i! 1i § Fs
1 -"-i rwu r� k�v t �- ..A r; tax r'' •,::._ {ya 3
, �: e. i:: !i P: �.(= 4 ,]as..� ,.`;s j9 ,?!,° .'j$"§9"r E` � ,. :: �. ""a°° zft° i+°
4 (}i i ! g, ��t rR° t i € ti S ii. q:. { i , li yi ] €1 1cg::§i i�ro j , ii ! t:� tk,i t 9y3s .tl. I� r
'_ # �4�{� tl z } ..I> Ir� ...E }}''° rl� , � 1 4 ,
.' ,�j+.#.'� P �'<.y � � .. } r F �r r .i, '� riE t��?� N c. �'�•i� r , ].r:xua nn ', � � �� �1 9
y � • }€a��t,.. �rl i.E°<o6;.r �� al'ri€`-js, ri b�gt--.{='=€.�°riE'' � { h1.}j 9'ii?'°�� E3 "P:. iq+ll I'E,.E,c� . ,€iP1
c.�Es
iiE i i,vjg!'ii j r ,r�5 Ei t E 6 ty5 i1 n �$1
i 1
'! `' a r sS,t d{�,.e °r�^ Fj a• °��j . ' P i. ij"v` fi i i iu �fEr } °ksI
��-..—ti ,},- •�"�E! �-i. tt�e���.��$g 3''"�iX;y �� 6 tr 9E[aPP!!g 1tr `, '�' rE ':fir¢ ry .,. ltt! jaj.,,: ,.�-

!'
�31
SEE''
I §3i34B'111i4%lit
Ski}ixi
t �g�;a
1?i
fi4}i�3:
3 4li:
§
iS19'r
_
Its
tX4h
I S6
MM�
D`ftlq�r�
Y
!83"
Eizie:ci{
E"i,�l;
�1
5E RE1iltE
�'"
€ i °y(( �} f.
8 7'e BP 3S£ ;i�
E aft l „(i., �! d ,}a
€ i', E
!9 ii. °Y :S4§ !' >
6 iig 'E+r;1,.
,fir
p
i
�i9
i1
Ht
4ir
�
iS>
[§
:j l
.#
AL
E. E
.Iqi
1;:�
I$F
}
, .E
:1
3 E.
Rx
�
���
.y�Iy�.:,it3
Y" s1fi
rE.
E it i{3if �£gg
6Eq V.fEr
yy @@ �u(.
iS
4�a
L
! E
€
r � zx . X B � f4' � � 6�
a
T.T
g�� et
iM1:n
i "9; � l: !
ttE
d.
6gE <'
S
S{�tffi
�
I�{i4C
M6
�4pk�I
:-_i9eoE,.
..:«►
. €F
;
�Q'
3�6i+`ks'i.:
3 {I4itt6
':3 rwjsmii
q
$�#cfY6Ec'k
{ 1 1
'zE•
_ _g!,
iG§3q{ '4;'.N. -. s�-: .':
'�i�3!F�p
'g
�'•I4'.E.
y1q
�4}9
E
�g �
,�,
�:
.€!.
�
3.�r;�'.
F' e {•
O
�"
'
"u.t
+.{,*►
ie°i
'?
i {
? 3>!p" 13. if
jli� W d;
�
�
�E♦
4^`!e
{
-rt
m
{
.�€
'�
.yi3
'.f p 4i�. ,1LS"
{ 11� E,r.,'.�
S
F
f6i:
�' F�
i
.W
E
t;;
t1;,:
�a
�.jE{!
t:•.`
g
1144
�:�
E
t_sl.-
I ��{{a � {�#s
{:.'!'.k�"_((l%'xxa '° �' ' -
y
f.
e
�i
,.E
of!
}}d; € t°� : a �i > E£�la'. $(( �tp "pi �j$ e }�3 �.i.. - � ! �-
a: frq-i ii�%8 ;d i 6', � '� i
S -
}jir. ¢
gs �
,
^E
eati'°
'9.E
!>i,r
�7d 3.xl
li': ��
:x ,
ifs . ii
{ €'{s
�?§�
�:;yfq':
�.•'��
S€
} • rj' €! E.'[h
�iE.I�I'i°r�.6..[6� �fi6� [ (�.a `:! �. ''.
�Y ':. V'§
I ? j i4 p
f
> y
(f �;�
E �
'8
�
�YY
B dct
iF §'
E G
�
e
.'�.v
1"" ``
1
�
I .f :: €
�
�
i3
:. �
,�':
V
k
4
�'?
t
�Iy
�
V
ii
y�
W
i
!
i'1!f'
�rN
{$}
e e
&
I l
)
3. i
4
_
E
i k .
-- -4
E. I
3tti�
? �}
,' 9.
rt9? 1
3
5.
„e�$t
, g:`6.
{€�((
1
3
7,77
- �, ^rb,pr il:".' 1 s �,�: .€ `� �fi
,.
G •:{ �.1 u
� 4
tt�33.
4
r�.}`..!.
5
!'-�tai
!
�r
.a;
`► ��
i-
�Ma
t
tS
e6r
�
',"�I
�°
� Y�� 4i�r'.� �'
1
i,d,i
i�11
.ddpLl f4 E}il: 1
� I€f • �
a.
t k, a I '97 Et i g
�q�°F-. 3 E i 4 `� <'4
'.
§ E
�e
1
3ii
�
3S
6
'�
r
h
1 7
'I
'.i
x
t rg
+?
L ' f
l}
:o-r�
i
€
k
, �"
<
�.
>� 7 ,� ..r4
Y �:1{i
4
ii�¢S;� 3 d �.,1
� ; ti WI Xi
�ii
::
�
'£
r►
JA€ r
3
1
�'
.. '�..
l.§#ElSiAN:
°R�g£%i ".� ils,6� �i§
f�.
dii .� styy F i :.
V i'£ "'.�� 16� i
�] " % � .. € x ',V § F
E
}� �A 1 }i'{
i
.P�
✓
H"�
��
�
�
�l '
�
�-.�
�ej
m
QM
}m � €
"i•
'}
� i"€I
I
!
M
,.4!.
�
l
r4
i
:. �
1 5 �y
� ��1I YI
m
44 r { E.
Y+ Il.i I ffiY E I
i E�_ xA. f(l�.s ...
r�
fll
'1
{ 1i'i
EA!.5:
A' :
6 � fli:gl� - "'►°{ ywli .� Iiwlr �",3 €� r wi11c 4.1(
� _.*§_ .L �rk wiE
�►
. S'1
,,.1
�.E
J
r
E, s
S. 3
�
+�'::3
� i
`"
".it°-
i
t €-�I
:1
E y
"
7
3�
�
�r !
i 7 (
qy E
6
((
31
(€
El
e <
{R y 3 � ➢'�'
i 3SE,xx 3
x3 4B 'Ila X.IIII,
3E
it EgfS s SS i§;153 il€
FE..°. ' "^' E -yE] � Jti
E.c1EEE
19�x , p. 49 6,E
[ l ! �_ �
if:.
i
€
ll F
1<,
S). i
r
ES
i d.
i{
k
€€l€�'9s Eii'
}EE 1 j k I
P4l �E l;ill. { E
�}§'.
r
.»^ {'I� s96`r1
f Ii.�! a r-�:, ..�9
¢<.
� �
i`>s
i . x
�.r
t �
a :
Iy
��
,!''t
j�' �
ifx
E ��
�
{�•
i
� �;
i.
�pE
�t
s'
� .
1
I y'I �r5"::,. .€ x d�•�.�� �� � �':;�i �. 1� E
�� {..'� � i £�_ !.
a
x:.'�
E.i..€1i17€
i}
E,
F
E :
�f ^.+
EI.pE
a
i
*
��xikslEi.1!
E{31�5 -" '.
3 !y.,.;
q'Al� � :`11�� {k f h � 3M'
!l"dd$
F� EYi3�t, i� §�£ £•i46
tf IF -
1� of
_Sg xi
i'
2Y
i r
E .z
.,
�:
.. iE
ifa d d i`E'9€f
3'
s EE
E„h
i
iS!
9if
i
y�
•
9
t'
+:•�:
416
Rtt
3 d
��7 §�� ?.
X 9.,y
�' Irl ift aii�
•€�
�J
S
z5 K
l 1#
i
t 1€>; t £{ t!x i essx< s j§g
:§ A
-6 $a� i�€.bz�
�'<� '
'I €E :_ ; fiif 1%. d€.:
,..1
€ ,i
E... !
1.
f
O
>17x
p.€
3
�O
•§
!
tq
° f,i.. /
, ��1 '(s4',� 1 `i '
,��'oi;ta
1 p, Q ci Ci O. C O
P.': p:nfi"444 E # 9', 1•1
iil p$ {l: dd 1 C i ( i; 7* 3
' Ijl !A t I " f E
h E
E FF;; ! ;..
99�s§ t _:8 'iti tt
3 § d bn"
�
£�
yy tl
y$.
�3p4x '.:
4
7}
841
3 r&:
Ei4
k
..i'I
cal
n ��
•t
'Q
f.tl
y�
y
?�i
'3
[ 3>
�t a g p
!d 3.E rl Pa
3�r,
( yy :Ett:�-
>3}t .
>
F�4p:i
:Fi
!...,,i
s
,,ij
.
E.
iA
E t € dtl➢ I6..:..
iEt
Ei� f %
tViE €�4: tf x
Oi
: �e
6 '�i
�1
8 €
1i e
• '. �^
'
� X-
€ ii
$
.��
€
Y.
�/
�I F� F�i',3:
4�}3i£F ,. 9 �i'
i ..E%l�tt€;: ,<u§
'F £;" f � tl �{ ZCf• ECI � € _ f". fE1 t`l `�S3 �?..� 3 � 9 f�': �
vim€
�,t € F x. �?. � r€. ''[ €
[�
g'il{B
�. � i
.i�
':
�
�
:
i3 '>a
3:oirl
v§ 3 3
�{
i v
>.
jS
E��i°i31
48 t.
�°
i '_4.
A£
iyg :., }{�
r�d &v, E�3
.8{
�,8
i �f0+3
k
€; ,.1, ff tii`` I
i ":',. a E i-f ::i
l�f . � @ £ �
IF '
S��
r 4 1�,1 p{{�
sgE(Eqq ±±x§[ }tt5(( $$ 3} {���@@
3 { AE "�.i E3 ^gi 6' l ili!itl
� � . i {>
If€ � 3€ I� !1 €
jS iai¢ i ii i
�
�9F55
Ei o'
I F^
g 4
I.
SSl7
f. $
E®�
Et }
EI t
6
° �
E
':j7•
4
{
�
asp£'
g3
pd
1
f
E€ E
�-."9f
l
iZ4V4
s ;': rii33'.
i
l �;"'
�C.€ fi li"$° i,rl
S :.
0,go
6 fE i
g n3
`
8'
! ;�>
gq
q9
fii tEEr
6
�}i{tisgE
£Ix -A
4i
°
f E
13�°E4
t
•e'4
°£4 " i,
{ :t6,E' �.
wl�
^E
'�
M1
5�
I
}1��1oft.£1
F
g
'..M�
f:
it
€.-

t1L 0-4i
jig jN
5a,
lay
Mlv,
Till
V7
rj
tit
A TIR - T"?
Too it
Piz.was
Alkli� OWN
BIM
U00
. . . . . . . . . .
409 . . . . . .
.......................................
................................. ...................
"C�Pfj
it if" �P' U�o 0
.........................................
lilt 2A
-kd- - �k . .
6,
4 PAP 59,iwl, Mw
. . . . . ........
tuL,,E 4 t 0 v
-C Q'I
M,
Q +_5kW!p1(RM 41
Of 41W fulo T'�
POP YjP74
1 7
,
Got
OKA A
1=0-:, e LP.
Mvp
. . . . . . . . . . .
EAU.
V-4 k�Z
Emn ---Z- 3 33t
ilk "Z�

»'
.�: y �'" _' � ��� * g ,`� _ � '� �� �♦ � - �` „_ ,.� � � E .�m,=:e� ^� -� ` .m:-s"�"�."�' -sue 'mom �- t'� '" -
,_,`
•'- �, :.:.�-.:_ .��'�'m�...c� ;esa_ '.'. "�`,i�'F _�""�, .�'..,,mw.. ..e m Y "`".�'�� x mot" _ 's: , a.`d x „'�a^'";� -,;�+ tt _ � � ,-.a_ �
.'.�' �^a,ff. �_:�----.•: ,»�rz :,x.,--...n ..y »...»: ate._ ..f. '.::... ..� ....: ... e�»:r.-- "-±�'..:_"4 �- ., ..,-�.x•.-. .. sr,:.:.a«a " xa«,�..wti[. ... b' r .ejV--.=
-_ FORM lRR= -._ LAGOON LIUIDeiRRiGATiON MELDS' RECQR3
I�OIv#sue` ✓,«"Z_ 1�W iraLZ 11• 18PH
9
Fam� [ic�rasr R s Mi Hwrt Fauns l {Ii"g.ol r Robert.C. Hunt =
_-�-
Addraiii 3oi 908 Hatlo;';,:f �: a t1T r • ,� e - Addt�ia�s 823 Cardiitisl iltiVe� Fsa�i. ilC i789& _-
,�_-�
_ �::-r.:bp�i pe: Y� ''.i>�/�31j" i. �a,. '•. ,�.� �x.f �•-�-�- .��-ftecemnted PAN. °-= 212�.. -.�.. �-«, ^W..-.��,^. ---=.-'„�,4��-;.a'� =.�
f { {mr?=1dc1lyr) „� _ - � {gallmin}= (Cialions? .t4a�Ac+e�"-
3a� - S-tart:Tfine""nd Tlmgjo�a A_ Wastb AlsaiL (lwi4
lVol 1mi(Pl4alnAcArnaojJ lltifAue8�a=1,:
€ a.
„�•° W -ry nz � a_. �Xl�?paQ@.:>W _ 8 - �€ a 14��3817 _ s� � �:1 �;:� �; � 107<:> �� 38520��.-
�:
L. a:, m:-... ��< . =w. .. �%4� :aa a ^:x�'°^":S• �";''" :mom �`^..e•Y6 fie_ ': :v.. �.� ., ... 2" ,.. h^X&-""`., -�S .,. �,,, ,t�^,
•� ,y_ %SPP r .�-�-. ?/22�#>08.,.f..: -8.� �14 ��.� ��-aa�-3'80 °.s ,: 1��"� ��« 10 ,� '" S2ti�� �883 � 21 iS:; 180 , �- ;�.
:vim •„« i�O0I1
�3lOt%fl. -v--_? _r: _'r' c^ s._..+- "_' "m `r «»� _ - _ �� -i` v ^gs,s',_s ----- .:. -'p- g:,,•"". `: -s v ^„^,_.._..
k � -
�_
,77�-
.. � � �:� .- r
. 9"g '1' -:„. x•„?'.i"=:_.# - _'� A .,. �..°» _ :: . ems,, �,.,.,r� qa- r s. .tea--":Y='","'"' -�s x - c; r, _ .:......e,..a
v .
�e;_n. .:..• � ��m•.<..? t; q_' :. -°.?�. 7�' :: �z°. __' �.: � .'w'�:�. .gym` ..::... «;"' 'rhr»-� m,.'+a�:.- mu»_» -�_-+e�:-_ �� ^�e, <,'� T ��,µ., �-`
6s#F 0 q., 180
D 1. - = .A dew -. - _80—
_
LA9oor1�-
�. j� - -
Y
-�:n Ana - --• .r _ - Dlog
-.
fA.
wASO
Aso
n
OD1!#
- - -_:
ao . m
-_ 0
B '
7 p,
to - — goon _ _F -
eAso
oe} �.
♦ ,air .. ... « - �'_'. w�-`::.."," __ �-.vm _ Iy+ ie-'�+L��`Y S'--t"""•&.�..�'>%� �i ¢-4� -C.: «"
< S
5- -
9

.9
r
-
A
�:b �s-„ ' `� Cry
—Y.r«_am:
Ys "'.1 :$'._`z x +ry
•i '-�, & '- '_«,',d
c.p y y„'T. +�`'
F RM IRR44 - r- _ `LAGOON IQUID_!RR#GAT{ON
FIELt7S RECORD r1 +
..:e
M
_- l4isld v.. F2 ' - '` -- lea
x -- FacilEty Niim 3r22 �- _ �_
fSK Fio1d'S s: am
= ' x
- '&CASTALIAFARM, _-
"+ .arm r � 2 arft" Huiit= gyyj a
terlg D FtoberE G Hu�E
x s address; jP O; t3ax:4o8 Barmy, NC178t37 , .' _ . s "•
Addr'iaa.1823.Ca[dleral,F7rlve lNfisosi; NC"27598
P, hafre1 Tg5 I1037 }tOnQAZ 7OPer:'
Phctte (262?1S�93S3 G"y-
..'":'i .w. �jrt :F �C.a+ -• ". .'erg' --... -^v-_, * k and'..^°%:^P:Xa „" T'P '-o' %ye, u3-
- ".^ xC
W
s
^� d...m`:..-� - .. }_ ,-`„.. .n ..::......,.. F..:4z.tl .s•zt ,..,m----' `
,Ks«� ,4.-.. :..:: " __j.. -.:_ 4t! 3 ,a
.. �riimlddfyr) j .. x --
(98Urriln) :� ; ( )(ana) ' {gell7 rol' (tti11004 s�1 -,{il ►ausi::.: tltii3tiai
Nut_ ur {gtartsT#�mB
Er74$
". ,
aC N , Y
_e
Leon snuzoos s -..
�aot iAs = 19�
107 i� saar 21 gyp.
In Won
1'
a
z Lagoon= $J4612Qg9$ 14a tll ' 1
1Q7 7$520 -86Ai i Z 1' 18 i68
Leon 812612008 gm 74 ` m380» P4 1 w
- -u
' 1IIT �, 36620 Q1, Z 1 1aFO
_
-
_ - I 0 `.m-i 0
_ MCI
eaYEW
$ _ 1
p
b., flmr 1
p: a o T
_
' 800rt;.e M. �� �� �s t
Aga i4p N
Lagoon _
o f
aeo == z 4e t
_
D. a qF 1ti1
all a A, OUT
not
s h b SAM Mp-
Losoa
7. 1
0-
WE;
-
77
.p

ORM lRR-2 W = - LAGOON LI iJIDx1RRlGA
��
ION FiEy DS RECaRC7
;I
.,
i srsn /lrsdrn t unt F*rma / 4Cak8Ujj
i
brig Oper Rohe€t C: Flunt _
x
Addraas'a' : 823y isel !?TI«Ys WiisoitHC,2788&
.,
x m
P.ht3ue3i =_ _ 3B2].2�lldt133 .- x_
_
Oper+11one �` {25Z} +t36-83$3 ^rr'
�Ap TyPsil/Ad i -
Rscarnntod PAN _212
UM
of e __N
_'(lVneirt} (Ciallona}' i9slrAer�j?. `.(►IdFCt�GOal1 iSfllwe+
e d - ' Tit mlg` aorinkises=
j al ,.older AC..Waet A min AOn.-iitra�n
la�ac>r+ rrauae a¢..
0� Wti zg �F.
} �. :1o'.���.� � � 4ia 3 :'-��,-�-�"-
tee.
�--�-��o7
taco m .` amp ems, r i
a
i _
o
NA0
cones. i F k
Y_r 153
agm �,. sf' sus
A m x exRs - m Q w
[ goon s �4
r
O ... !
O
1
godn
FK 7
7JC,�''"
.-. �'' �- ,or..r�;* ..ram c .�'._ '� ' � "' .�:
'�-��j
y s �r;:.°e" n 4;,=� ".
-.. ;.•.tee. �..s�x�
`��€`.. � �
+.F�
� �
p
5 xFT:_„fC�
AM p
s
i
o Asa
lagoon -
= eW
sO. ��
_�-
Ak
i
-R
1

Alp
r 1
"d dfi A)
�@ I i T'
'Will
Y
I ,§€ Ik # E-01114E
a°"WfAi
63
i 3i
{3 g
�W
i�
1
9
E
t.{
�3r�x
t k"1
i s`
-' / i' {
I�'
{
Q
P:!
i'
14
�a q*H4 �°`{Ht I'@� , Ikrt➢
9 _:. (k {, ��. a .,� k
¢F� I;rf�I,F
� i'� !➢��
4f rR, pQ-
� � � R
f§{tf
p `
- h�
��[}
"➢"`
J V�'js,'
�
pE,# 7 C�
Up
,G.
"f
11F
h
Sf
' ��
wi.
� n
^^�� ee:, {{ ° .ra
I.:,
°
r�
E
! t{
➢+'
I
i''.
� }
i;<p
to
111C
'
y� �9r � � '*i� F U{➢. a i r�
t+ k � r �`
b �I ri
Y�{
�
C
�I
� .
�! a. +,�
�
!'
�
� D �
£ f
NI� .},1
f
'7>,
s
S...t:
y�,
P
f € ".B p• bit g�p,� € i1�€1 �� � - Id $ � : £:
.l. �YE
�' � .
k#,r'I a� tpEp[I.:,f� �:
E Tw 3 S [� 7�
1{g 4.
€E
• . F
1 .
��
�
¢59p
E
y�"
F`
"9.Z it �1: , {
Pi �� di ���• ;il P 7.
€�EEIE�, i�l. YI
ffff P
'
g
ep
rl iy
pE
} r ha ':-
�x
� .➢
m: �
¢�
�i
�„ r, z � f .xaF
B i 3j§ {' � 3 [ I� R 3 S _f.`g'
i E p t
�'
I II
L E' E{: �
}
a.i.3 y :
,-E '::i "3
de {
E:
:
9 �!
3�'�➢
{'I
q
� ��
m
S P 1
i
Q
ki
�
�
tSg _
f�
! ' 9
: I I IQ Fi. ¢I ��"Ei€` [ €? f1
€•➢ § P�I� tj {
f
.
it
>'1
Ir
� �a
v
d1'
➢ ft� _„ ? s IY.,i §� f §�� I E
fig Y .. [
h€t
4 3�,
i .47r,
�z
,£
i?
r
,g
III
NO
O C 0
I
((
C7 FQ O� A
'y1
gpi
G .i.:Q
0;
i�
'§ ➢�$?.: 9I
EiF
E <t
#tE k6
"
�f<�flt � 91ri{ ;[� L �_ •a �_ = 7E � E r t
�p$,Ei �3 i E.+
�.1 a [ r,'. i t F
:+ '.a
>iv k ac Q'
'�
'�-k�
:f
Ri
�I
'.:�P
i f'
E
r
:!i! E➢ i =:rr ,.�.
3j IE Q Y tia 6 {E �3 E{,AYE 6 - •t� 3 � � .Fh9y ! {$! 6 t
• �[3i{g� f[� -�€ E jl t3 i° t tl p d 1 I `CF { � §P . `f'j t Q
� i i 9^{ E � E[ i { i P 1 ,''€
' �
sa .►
i6 E! })
� � f E4y f
� . �I i�� Q -. it
«►, .a
�
� , a
99�i ���f
r
€
�E
a'��
:a�
1a,..{
�A e
Ilii`:t
..0
3.
I"Y
r
6.
.i'
._rk
.► P-►€
{ 1
i
-� .+ �
3 i! 1 3
�p-i,
'}
i
�
{{�{
!i
{f
'
�
"t t .. r
9
3 ➢ � 6Q,
x QE
'
t
ay ,,,
q
! . F
�
Ri6EE � 3�
�i
x
iiiii
i i Ill f "pII tY t ' 3
$(9
7�
"f
�¢{
Qt.
ilfrfffff
9 �I. -E £: F E€EE
�I s ig i O pi �:
, 8 �P i�. r! `S
!E d < E:i..'.
.: �f{£3
i
i (
�{{
EeE
i £ (-
�7
[I.�'x
�'It. ..►. I
C`
'I,
` I�°CC
S �q}
fi@�
e +
ta:a
,
£➢
-F' G
d 3 rr a � r'� '➢i
`jC § �, ; 1 � f Iqe,; � 9
¢�
� }��
�)pp)e�ryr i,
i'
"
,aa:�Ihpx�33f. rE➢
+i➢'r
''„
r .
�ti,�
} I
1
`"f,
b �
rr 3
xr
1:. , p
+ :
Vie•
y d3
YI€
...
Z
r I
n
;:
&= 2E
;3 i1F7 Idj€ s{ f
t §YfC €alsp{I(e E1F a$ y f j i Y 4 g26'p f ![Et{.EE [e ` F C :p i
tE➢"al eE@ tt€`:11sex Yii .�I 9 & Gp E ?f,,Ep= E r.{
ii pt( F -- [3
BF:ri I`V EEIi'9
f I= .. @
I S dt<
3116 n p k.E Oil
�..
�c
I`;c
g ¢
�y,
'?
3
li
l��1 E 1!: ' s ��r�, >;�k �; I I ; I
7+ £ ! .::3
� s, "� I �'
�tl
i' ' '
➢
3a -
[
E}r
�
�E ;ix
i
� N
;;
iti
f3ir
�
.+
!i
Af
Y E i I€jIQ !jj ! ii $dai �ii,��ii€£
'i0 i Et) {
-O O AE O
➢q� 1.{f
-99 p
Gy C, A
y+�flO�In-_'p
OI
I
GE
fja
O
P
RS
3
t
Op COO, p-
[$CI
d.EP@ 7•lt�id3 IiQtiN g , Cdp= !
€ its
9@ E { ° a o FP !!!' ° p $ �i ➢ '�[
.E QIF'E
(E!F -:
,= j�"}i..
tE}E 3 6 k
( k➢'
fl {
dQ
€
@�� 5¢I
E{[IF
Y�r g( F it f P S€
kk fYs3
rl
�� � h
�
77
-.�g
td,
I7I
y'ggqi
�.
�
I. �� s
!: 6dd I sN, �r. , E1 #sii� �3!
E 5 E f�
d
1�43?i� 4p(S➢
i3�d.�
""An3
�,
; Q
f�
d
�
3}ii.. ti�
E[
�9;9;
}I!F
E if
j
�
€l
t,_ f 19P ':, M ' 'aN� iW
�. $*I1§ �{€'+{.i+�F � I ➢d't FE Ep �; j 1 g � r
- • T -
� 9�e, tl
M"i"
R ),{ _ r
t 1
O
3
k
'
'.
h
�.
�.,'$ 3
psi F
y_ r y
f
& -:}
� [.
,
55 bg �^! .t i€ ! E� €! - i{ !! �i (
q�
IQ88 9
II
I i 33 EE
5 -b [
7
+
�
51 �,s
MW N
:f.�
8
,SHf
;'i
9
9ee a.y itsx3
�. f( •: 3F
(
ep x jP" i
Y
6 �
p r a 1 ] 3°➢`-E- �r r34t1 L7
E A6 ➢EI
d ? 6 (➢:-
a
ix
41
€{k
6i[Ef
"°�$
� §�;#�i p��:fi
41
§ f ` q@� �!
� N
a 3
a9�
�E
Z<
�
`''� �B'^
E ET
y A
89e € °!3
��
�i<i" SB :el: F9#I IF i � € 3' .�9°
L! �{ ➢F'Fft 7 i E �..[. � �
6 P` {
�['� I✓ QI.. �C
iS:%�
��L i. �, £
yp
�4f
°CU,
F,,
iE �
p
1 �'
•s
s$
tl 9 IPFe
A t i}
£ �i €
F fq--�
{ i
Pf
7
4
{iks
� Y �"Mi
71. pE
�§`6P
H�
.�'.
}p pE,
•�' P. f r,.. �e_ �S NE J1 IN q
�9 E � ! z - NE �� � r .` i
4Y
r.. f ➢ I [ f `
� i .. £
t
� � i
'�
f
£
9 !
1
➢ o
5P
£ °.�'
''�dC���
F !3d
�.:I t
FiiF
"' a.,
(h
i`
I
'�
j��i AAA I
�'
I �{
v
:pk.. .
t3 ,�i
}; � I �t �1-, , II � Q'i�df;F S� {
�.. t.3l Efi tl^p
{¢!i= a i�- � i ...:F�fk
s£" tse
�'.'
S !r�
.�
nY:Yd " �1
'f:� 3
tL
..
�.C,i.
M� { r
ra . i+•
0
II., I',. i. k

T#d f11V{ t
� ��i3i;-g
kr
h
I@Rd
Sg�, %[,1i iaPdi b.p !•°k: `r]
JIMm
i�d
.cif
"ti` rt¢ `� € :. e P � g �„�; �
�f.
� , �
Q�
�
4',
Sri
�
€�'a� iH °#
°
� �7,
r t•,
['�3
�fie:iaE
d rif
�Y
° ' € 'dti r} '`�;
*#a2gp i : .
t a:i
O
g.'
q
}
P
,;IFy
P , :? a` fdd f'�@ }{ai fr Hi-�[ {!�!t
YX+.+ d} f t'v L 1 •f
1.t#{-
��dP@i
Y
�'i:bl( �}$ i'Ir�rP�
p CprJ a�i}
{lp: d
��
.
"{ }
„�i
r
�
1
!#',df
V'
to
#Ff
t}l
@°.i
'^llf
i�
�'yr'.
a
'.Ps >td
#t^pj
«•
r. , �.
p
4f- f?�xr !!Yi,i
.: (.
E3
`�s'oEs
fri
{v'7
=C�€d
aj
::
i 1
i'
,t F8.
I
4�
., a,:-, �
°da°
T1111
j
I J i¢d
{",7.'>e+i
9�1@
eP¢
I
P.7rf
q t dg',a.
#i#
33 3� ss ! Y�(#-'y : Pf
! t3 P£selz% i x tt j
?; E➢J� d € i` a :pt 'i cs3 db f 1 f Y 'y.�:
^ � �fi$' �
i
d
i
i Yq 1l €di]fi
Y,d 7Q QI
3.Yp dP €.
�•:' i
.3
^FY-
tr�r{'
!"
Qlatl
S"
f f
_t�:
I,Y
�E#1ep
di='
IM
7 &
i
�`.
r.4
qs
- M� "s
N
"'�
E
°a«
#:'
#�
I{
a €
i
E,
t
7
#@.yY
••
.µ€.'
11i
'�i
d' 31:or,
3
Q., a !(. •4':
;t..
3
i - '"
id a�rY{ �9 ' �, r j� Y 1,
d Q'p 1 F ! fl 1 r
h Ip i E d$dtl t€da➢E St;p #
3 tq➢! ( !. A,3(( $ it }¢ i{r43 r tr ,r,`i I7d3( �_ €PIYf f r t d -. d�
1! �,
3°
ri !
3L n)r•
¢e P@ it
ar i
4' #3
lrf :
€ i4ry@
i ==
@i
i
e1�,
yl
. E E
#(
q
sill{ErE
't
}y��
Irg
�.
a
;i:a f@E -
4
B b
�€7 EPtdj, E:d� P P �. 11 a sr
$ _ 3: ,, e I@I# f�3m i �
1#
is_
!}!PI�
1 #:B3 , , @ ffry! d�},y} 4I1 }y p
I,€EiYa{i�3)3�.iFS
(i!!
rl°
'.7'•,I# 7
ar7 r,:
'f�
€
rj (;i fi3
b
$ f a
-�„ f € ?3.d. y@dr ( r!➢ 'i R t II @;;:.rr j a i 3 ' . ':� r P!@ i' 1�' 3 p
{ h @ -
:➢
h
�,
,: a.
Irk I
I
, d
E
ii
Ik` Pi Y �a
j.. �?
r�Y
Ed :.�,, - ➢(;`j�1 �'Qt �� �.�"$i {{€'±BdPdr, y[„° x',jp-: �. {7ii b yd:3. `?@ #p1Yd°t££ h. a e rls l
1 E} :, ,i€
S€ Y A
.f
3 rd€
i° frj
! eYddfl
.#,.
p vv
i @ap
�f,
>
- l
fp,((
3v° jf
F{;:
3x:ji
i�
p 3 u
„�
€x$g� [
3 j
-_
�,l
Ells
}i �'.E ��(s�E
ri ff
ii
r,tF
¢ d€!rdl¢
E;l
rYjj
j Q ➢
:$1, ^t
"}.C,
j
i
€ i3
€
t (
€ �
-
!I
i
,Ll
iifa 1 P1 Y
7 f#:i a
rj` y
tP �' 1
fP,a
•M'itE
i rd irl
�l"pi
s.
f.(#
1
�;
s'�
Ali
1. €!
€
ifj
}Albin,
�j
9, d f
E
3
i`9f �d iNC"
f.
!
i r iE
��(#
} f $'
:
i f'
a@ pa e
,,
1".PP:'
t t
r+i
#
ill
'S
(`'7�it,
"#
i (.
t
E
a4 ¢
1
-
..
7 , f
•'
�+ ,. #Y '8,di #lj8 E@'Fd, E i
r l L ( dAd: r 4 C7 t# j
f P{ 1,%!S# r€� taa- d £ Yl r .• } J it dir qq iY 7 r II.}l. I
da;t ki @ ! S°8 Qjki..i7 { f >f1 �. E€
➢-!!'r1�9�9 {{ r� 1 n., ��. i➢, �dd. 1
I
s, pE
97$
@ F
. i $3
# fi€d'
3px
L ID
k
�.
1 }
#. i..i
•
,
-NE.N..€Y�;
.. j
..
P'
#a1.3
Ynl
r:
:�j
1
�j
p�
i
¢!1
�pr
Y, SP � �'(:
y
,
�"X �'5;�
idE.1fFF ➢ 3dEr @t dP '( p. , i,;@` # 1 ! p p
r A. Q @#[ Lf E d 1 DDi{ii it fix# d,J
'gn r
' � Y
14'r
i!
P@
13
¢P
°jj{I,i 1
E i #
s
P tl
:�s¢,
:.o-,,
''I!�.;,!t
7 Y 1
d'
i
g; l e
3 !
f
E,
1
f
i:i € I4„ 3 ie?.
I
eb
d g °ff ,j•f:fa, :.
> _ I� g �C ;: P }.: ';,f ( .0
f 6 i. i. IF " ➢ �
Y € l
J,•,
�
1'? ° d
9:. i' E
r
!f [[
t
W
;s}.j
y LI
g,.a
,
�
d
C@Y8e' �qjr
[.., }
3�
I
}f .�
r
€ f
s
:f:
$ E ed
s
I.€ a
xx
ii. P �. g
- tk r $P
..,,,
Aj 3C
(�
�r6 g €
§, a !�
e'.
r;
q ,
P§ -
& t
iy dWf
%i„
E `'
i':'z
'
, #:} "�#
t
dl
-,r!
¢
d! ! " ➢Y�
t^ �"S Ci' �"! Ci � � !"�N
! e d
_93� d.�€
;�;
lY �3
'fr {
rl_
P�
,@
1;
rlP�
r.I
�
'>'
�
F'
dlj
t
�,c
s a&- dart •rl
a}°j
. -.. , , .. -
f . r!
€, EE
#! �i k
1�'fl
mac.
Y E5 ■.i
0
lsx,;
P+Y
�,'i➢
, a t(= 1 ; .R
d§r
k -
/
P f
7 �3
-a i
+
+
@gi
aF
q
h
•F,
3k #
C.': E�
1 v
aY $?E"
H
,fig € ! n
fi i
pp �( s s xx It'€f k i#i9 #f<
)q3
t ,; E id 1 #{jai°ot f 1 :I AI
7a. I
fd
?
@ F
fa id 7 t
4'
1
1
i
}a?
°,@dY
rY �g
r°€:
p
f
A 1
�, + rrr
j$''{ jSfiz j iP '.iP@
¢}E {i §ii p1s �' b➢a t e$ ! z.} I y rf, :. ,€
1L, j.a` r':.a s r;y it €1s¢ "#
w
a 3 ->l
r.,
i
j d
s
¢ i
I f
P.-
.�
adki
;aiP
{k
dF{
y
1
s
i
- g
}ge.i
F
dt
:F 7
t-•:6
1g�
:«a
Y"lSe3€i-
'.p;�l
�..f
! Ir►
Vlii ..S d @l pp i' k.'
�.f 5 qx t#n# 'xa Rx"'i i;- f' P ¢t!f a..}1' (� `d .(
Q # ! , i 3 9 . d. jt 1 rf• rl - .f ' Bh
rj . M tYl �jy a �{y? $^{. j
>r Lrl. + �d}
d
r
'.i' Y i§i§
Y
:r
1 <..
?
I
�'
P
£y
wi
.:.
wh` w 3
g
d
}4-`P
1
PE
E x
{
(.Yr
<iPIR
1
Ed
P, @'i:'taE
t ddgf. f'llpQ,Ij}�A 1". €> £3 73 jp: jE E 3
➢a Ft 13 3Yi b ?i,Y'�f'
A., j•�j ( ! �j` Y S Y: fp�ry i � �° @ E¢
�IE t ra1 f'Eii£ !@
}
33
37 i
'
"s
S::
PrI '
3¢N
P
X$E
_, ~
t@
i
d ( -. ^
fi
@
@$
!
P
E
3 i lef
>¢ € €
E,E d$
1Ih § .J si 9 B,?.9P d.f -. F
: i : i d Y(f :jli j it €# AY, i ffi3
�s• ¢
¢¢i¢1x{g,'(y( •7 7�! 1 f P.i"j.�i. f/C,p,> $ .<e#� xfg pj ^t$ €Alj�# ij�Fgif � ('i� €{
Ifi s g Yi
'; @l it -rg
€ ttiE
r3d�d
sl.
s
db"
P3i'x r
':.:sa t°�>.
p Y
i;(H
(
Ixa�,.?�
sr
€
�
K
a
t.i":f
.3
y
�'+!'
. i
1
➢) tg._
} S , 'i:
#< f:_
#i i e.
1!y
ii
I
x I
PI
+V_I
MYa
ry,
1Vf
R,r
yk�
/
4
6i
" I s.- ¢@
jP}
ir£tll 61 : •
F4 1:
i� P
¢p 7k; �f�` � 1 .. 6 •, @ H f -'➢if t! ,9- ':i. �
•,17 dd, . I�'1 rf iy a. 8 di t 3eIP{ ii1S:f ri
,. f f { �'Gf :fg' S]11Q.
�� 8 ( �
� `�#�::j `i fx,
, i�l,
':': .9}�
:,eEsa@ f b
?@$%. ) °i
J {
Fdaraa
➢¢.r',
iif #
� #�
,
t a
f,Aar
;
fgs{
`'�P$}
:�
"�
#s
'�Jt
;I,Idt,
;V:._
Gi
.,_
.:) :
�',r
_ $"
R`•
^j j
F,
!9i
;
'
`+...
rrs 1 5
1; �
-€: f, r3
: f
!I
,t
k E
a. �;ERa,.
,
3 a d @a f
E. " i << Ed f 1Y!" a
4Y - 1 , @ f• f �,agg{ ¢¢ F t
1 aX F >iljj,
E ij�>) l sti vd IEIf4r➢ r:I s { i 1
1`'
i § - F
€r€
Q{tI FIF
rag35
:.
d
?
fr
3 .¢
3 aj7
f r €+
^�
�.I
@s_@^
.:
yI.'.
Is
7
€I
:
�i
E. i f �
p ,_
P JI
_.
.3# Ir. l r?
1 i,. ! F € {- +r,kd W ' P;fl: t + git ('
Y i S s % %l' i # i,
"
€CE fll3@ h• i �!{� p ih#� a ':€' d , �� k i
a ft
? &
d (r'
#,(P
i
4 -
p
l
Y
1
i"fir
G
#$•
Al.{ x� I4 71
��E�. 1 71°8� i(+;} s# ;i i'}i f B ¢ -. ,IV � 'I
P;`!! t€➢+�, f:d�A vt #➢...�?d OI °f t:_•!@ {{dr
,#HY Ri t 7Pj [Y ,Fy 1, °
3,Iff:
'Ht➢@.?i:
DAM
V,
o
�
g,aj
@
+
.��,.
�
%"€
,x#rp
ig
I!;j I.'
1 -4;«
f �
,g8,
I( >1�
r
- f�•
'
14
3 a ,.,
il
er
'.
N
f° L:t. :r �
¢�� fes313 Ord' A,
s IJ(,i 1 4'".rV M #'j ,'
riyf Ys[{ t ysa p
.IJ,d ,9.;,,s ¢ -,?r�Yl Rff IF
°'>f i " tb f>( 'dP,t!fi p€�' a2P. �
itss
,..
-f.
o . 4��
FbfPP$t{'<
•.£ :
.
sid
_ #'
'�'.,
N
i
{
€ .,; i , ➢�A
zp C
l
II _ ;rd .r.7P➢rE } ) a
➢�
yJ € i / �! 7 3
f:P °t :'8 € f tt tAlt,
1 G a$f �
Y
left i p
a f x
f
ki
tp
f P@e
dHee
a f e
�p 31
Gq
W
€�
iA
�p {
1
'fAl; .
@y
lei
�I
tat `
Cf:.!.
ti
3 F
„€rr,; # r
€,
�
€� E?
: rJ pPa f$, E F , ; ¢ €i� l@ir 7v11
E .� cil' Ol naa �7 i a'j: sit SVEC.E � p^? •,»^i �,a�tjt ° i >. Ei 3 i s i s p
t E�#'Sfj
Y'�S
@f rj@
fist €Y$Y,E
a p.
z
ygr. {
e xl
g�
p"�i y
1
✓"b'1
'
f
P
4r P
" ".f#`w {f. $1 #I }}(Y`i i liia3 Sj § }i. ➢ t, tll 3 1 € S
a ^V"Y
3
-:
d
3- '_
�,
1
G
tf
-. !:
"�
[d
i Gy, '13 b(
€�
F§ Ej:.. 4( 4
f"
€>•: S a,a®
3 ,$-
i' @8
i r
,lgg
f ¢o
:€A1
�.
i$-'
1
fa
€f
If'�.
-
!a
i$ q; >,
'2 € A �
,'a7 i R.¢€' F. .�^'
it� � M i] A
QFt.,p. £f[i , d1 sd; f£$d@ i r' - ! te ,1f 1
y [ g: P! � 8P�- €:^� € f!p k@i �t €P�Y 7zp@) J 3 !@@
g i
?`
:
�(�
I'$
�`d:d +
p
71.; f^�(:�
-=
3
g
ca
Q
�
W3
1
...'
tii:
'7
i
N
�
4
iiL.. d�: F
lY
10T.
I ff" P. lfid`I.kd 11 e r "1 ! j: 'vt
O
➢a{
IO
::'iEU f
If'�:�
�B
.►
":ra
E Fa
�,
;3 ir�
h -r 7T; € �p f �; h` ge 44 dtd #➢ t:H t?sP' I 3 §,;-.
77 tf-l!YfPrt�R l�ld # @,(,:, rap .s .s .l iyyk¢ i' ..-; ` fd-.:.Yfl i 1 �3
Ff 3,#1#@ [ 1 [" f bYi'Cf fif 'f
�gl
i
Y
:1{
F Pj
I�
y
I
Y�f
-
f!�
I.{^Y6
1}p
yJe,' F}
�'
A- .
ii¢i
:1
j
t {
�ad#f
�y
ii&
rI
k'_0
! fl f� ZPd@YY
'-- f t dr
}§' "
1� � f $ ��, #'d @ d"±il i i1 d 1P¢t ':• i tFb'� !P� i a&; is} 3 : F C ': }
Y
E
�j. I
F}'
p �
�
�
�
�Ej
r 1�
�.:.
's�
s¢ E.'
1
'
'7 F Yd
P(f' f.
P$
�,,
Y
ti,',P- w. ad?f €li;
li
, aqr{a4aa i
Yy
g
��Si
jr, ! d dr „R I E}➢ r .;IBI f d
••.� @ �^ ,a. F Pif
P� ,i fir#d1?a: ;>a}}g
�t3 R
C!<
-
�� AAA
s. '
�y:: #
}
$1
IY e
[ '?r
it
..r,
W3,
?°
Y r,..r+p
p
d s
R'1�`f
?
,
f:`
>i73�[} #
IMP
�
k
¢ t r]¢
E^-I SIFT }I'
IF l[7..
1 §I , #
k �r rt PI�� I a?
¢
I
' r.,
yI
rr�
a
,$jp!
o
3} r
idEf
a
!P
'ad7d'
1i f Q y',
4%1.
941
t
S
._!r e.:, H: .M ➢ f
..qg1) l Afs,ag
+�LR".1 x i' � �€ �'�•� �
r j".. tsr:,. I+
� '!+�` °
¢{i
! 3�
': �#I �k
��
�dr#,"
is
I &
"�
,?kg
Rig
¢
SH
WW
haF Ip$p_€'
@ is
si
jdi
�•,
kj��'''�
lit 1
r�
et @ t.
P {!•�YY i >s£P €�
f � 9
gn: €
. � � N �'� d ill Ill#
jjpa H'°:4
� #aP
�!#d iFF
# -�
jea
��
d r t
f $6'@,.a ti@€3yp3�
�'";
1
H
m
t
i
,gl
�
'. ... 1�PA
^. i
n-

al Ylk a- ?k !St {N @B ?i'f fi dlPFatdl'�5
s�td hfp�,;jJs
I ;dlffgr
dE
' !
r i If
�` Irv{:3 tgr
d :sfrt
{ &1r15
3 1 i }
e"w
f{
+' ..
i`�$Ei¢¢Ri�d
F
tt �°
'��a � �
'�''r�i3
�
'�viE
ie•l
f
g6edp 8�S
�
EtF
r
d Y
(#}a
�3€! i@ 7 d+Y nP pi �
i l 3• d d r
aE
r
#
Al
d
�
t�Yj.
, e
p
�;r
Zitl
e� �
:
I j
(�tY�
S }
q
p'� e:
, �i,; Pss # F � Y
I 5
�!
�PP
-�
$P
. a•. „
R !�
I4@@�
E �
b
1
EgT
K
P. �a ` 6 1t
'P _ Yf i@S � � ti P
}
P ; P
I
:,
€ '{
P
P §
S&I
�Si
t
,�i%�
'ip
I x� P §_I_, €Y ; i @ � + �{j-
) I �r�F�at
¢
-r
j
a �
i
�'
■l
kvil7 Y.EE@xx> ! d`Z , �yn 3 P
r,
nI(
+
Nil,
A
j d#a j 1} a d I °''d��
afhi d
iya9
A @
�Fii
�►
!`�
.i, ?
F:
s
8a
I e _
$
dL
.�
p (F•
!I3# F € 3'i
y i h
f
3r n
'.
P dds'
t
[
3
t
. 6
ii
#ytl
�`: "' #
+►I
E
�
rZs:-
S!
- fd
yy
A3
v. 1
ff PP s�ppy�<<. tt � �� RY4F°f ��.�v A i4';
!$15 1 7 I l @ GAv' 3 Fi S .EQ I 1 I J" Y r: (
1PF ,! E I{+f !!' }y,`g{i sr `8 #id I #,.. # E §/
} Ili i
�1;:t
�
d: Ii
' p
f P4�
N
¢sd i
;Ft
338ii
f F� I
Y{
rJk
.
i #
I
W'
@
'$`Ff
i° r:
�'.
€
t
e i
n
f.
♦..
-,
r i P P> : €� E F R F $ r? d ¢
�
F
,gr
4
F
E
999
I
I[
.�
3.►,
1 s d ".
i.$�,.
' ��,'g
j
€11.'r�
y»
fbE
L
f1(
!d@e
P
PE3
dE
Y
t s.
-��
di
s
##,; I
� z
P i
�
#,
d
i
do n
7-
t
d
n
E
;
Pll
r
i '!..
-
[
d
i'ig�
'�
#`--
I� s
(jit r S tl 1 I Y :3 F' "t +<t 'i 3.
'. #�
3:#
P w
}#dr
sji9 i
Yt
j i
v �
,..'}E 4
{ji1 �
f_
¢{4<
(�$j)
tgjC Pt 11f ��YY�f , ff
1t1
'fe°P� F,�l frillI # iYI 1 i ,Jt Pt f Q?i..¢,°jf P 4 @ I@ !itl h: # Ei�
3w ± is in f� : # r:79'
v
-
p aE;
.
: •.:#
-
L.
s p
°,
'►�yf)
,,„
d
ii::i
Is
+�
:,.
• i f
;YE
Oi
f�'
"'.J
i �#
t @r F.
fY
1i 18'j3 i g. � fit. t ! 3k1; #; r i1 r! 99 ✓t N G t �iI
}
31?I.
-.. [
I
1
,l
J
•!.
d) Id
s
td$}
! i
..r
3
Nlfi'dj i 1 i gF 9.' lr 1 P iY [ tl 3 {I. ,qt E(§ t' EA E IIp�Rl
it p §d r it I I f t 3 S i {
k3,,Y.
-
I( V
.Pf
4
�1.
iaC
„�.#
J 3
- >�
Z
M
1
i
•�
k '�
IdfM x>•�
lhstr#Y ^i ip�"iF
pp V
qf' 1
k
J :�
�,
rd E
"X-ad@
m�dtf
' d i
±°tts
1.x
� �
i
i.G k
1'.i
1
3
it7i ?t� I �. 1 � C. , f ". r e B hfgtd
P•'(°g
i^�_a]
�
Y � E SM O OP
t
E
f,1
%'I .�
g€
it
'�`' I f t @ 1 Yt 33 � i r p[ t f,
} t
�. •:'
r
t
I
f-
aE
+ -` a
Gjj
�P �
f
p
V
1
I
Ir =
1}
i i ( .,�;. >` ii t€j •.: d ;
ris Mil 3� r►.:_r� MI#
Q
w.A
v:
!
I t$
fj
d >.(yi
S&_
a� t I
t
�t d
Y!i - ra
Y ya
ik
§I3
@ f.,
#"
t €
E
S
�;.
r4
I€� ij it r34i•, (�}g #E¢ts_' ,sLi€ s !i i €- §x€ P3 # i s F
rj�'#
-
s�
'.�
€ f�.n �3 dt +� ` - �§ � tiR
16, rpp33
o#+= {{
I
1
t
�jg
1'
kx
•i�'i
NN Yt
f
.F£,.i
sI
3
f
i
t, i# t� ` ,� r �##;;i14 3 � ".P ky ds6 ! } �i9gf , s !,-. 8' $ 11
-fir }ii $ $- $��
i
P !
F
i y i
�'sk
q
H�
fj .%
- •#
N
:. �.
I $^
�.
+
�
«7.�
IatE
i
? :t
=+ 9ry a = y. ;f`, 1 d l
tf,�,}jyyffE I 7} l t t y. i. i'i 1 � f9
ifaa' Y @f ifd h A
E�pl
.�lae
!r
R3'
I
ra
t `(
i d
"f $
f r E
' a
t{Ee'
I SiII EI1f4FB: !{t -rj _f ., *g s: �' i1
@
33 ,�grr A #
#. i'1i GSM'=
FSI �_ � t .� 9 1
'¢It !Y
`•°
+
•�F
d['
I�i�
^;'#
Efg -�
1�[
E#?.: tiff
#(
Ptl
Fed
'4
--1.t{F;
'�
A'°�.3
#-re
W
i
x
SS
rdd
W::
� ¢�
�� �
Y
>{al� F.
s 2
e a
1. fF.. E E IY' ifl Ptl.. it tr E tt eea�r
Ev "'i { I E
�$„ I
lr t
'�
E j-i
1�•t
tiijr
! PYt
ni
�t
3 1
K
j.
€E: is
(
3Y
POP
7��j
tfW+ "{i ¢siiI t r e • �l 3 ��{ �. „� I I k sJ�i. flt
Pfn
1
{
I
¢dpt
b
v
„�iP
g`.i
SE /�
:6+'rt ;4 P } x4 �€ s ;#, LB iaPl ¢ l(S:r.! 3� €
E y
(,(
�'
�'
tw
a
�'^
LO
t•
i+:rf$I
'
3
l�`
°
I {1g Eid¢7 Itt...E 3r8 FIs:; #tr pp i7 .R.'. ;.a Y lY j,1d (P9y
.i
y i V. 1I¢
i!Ij
I
Bix
waF
E* { S 'tdiF;. IY¢tlP
0,
Y4�
, •,:
Q
, I
, r
wi
p,g
N
mr
W
{�
'�t
fۤ
{J�,.i
.�
••
�
yiR
E
i'l{: tv
=x:�:r
c
PC ;
C
@
{'f EI1 si( ��7{ii I�ff :YEE'i:1 C i
!{°-
#
�:..
+9`I
dj,• s: ds
kil
€�'il
l�'
`Pr �''
�
��
'�
./
tt#1¢I
I !['� � 1 rdt r}�i.�� {�">f Ij I4 .I. � F- � #i �y i',
r
.�
r
�
^, i
7��^
r.
� E
3 P@`-'�
rl
4
I �
�i
i
3 3• FYI
t i¢ rim 4_ IL'i° IQI G1'. pQtl
'4
f{
d t dE
p IP�itr
@ 4yryt
r �i k" Y
kf,
k�1 tt
t 4'
W' F
r
1 3$
P 3 3P
# . E1
�-
Y►,i
} �j
'
A
IT,
ire�
q
!rip
Q#E�
F
i
t
Ji>
3 r
^!
it
r {
F{
.1
i
t#
rtr n
,p
Igs
9 'a
N i,,
''
q�
4"FpT�
#$(F ?j{.1 i - Pi
ri:p O : 8
#I h
ii .L
tlr g
p@i
d!
3
rY
¢'.: •
4.,..
rf�
.5.
Fsf
rikYnr
1 N
sidf
¢
i'-g
I
13
t
is
I
ml
e _ � iiYMM I ¢� , t3
i; ply
t7'
��' �
�f
}}y,
�Yr�'
f;��tt
= N
,
Y•
i
Yy
§Qd"
-�'
i�
a`
6
�
�r
�
P +
✓ ii t
4;
�:flE rd€rs,
'�' ii% i 1 k.
Imo;
Z'!/r r - �.i. 'Q> . ;� "'�
P I
f
n
i •�
�
1
� #
It rP� �'£H�F�:i.i.F'.�'YAvfj�
Yyt
N �
@ � P d'
E1Efg�
Pr{#�;'I,
,i
�f�:
F ff
•h
k I
� {.'.
sl ..
0; 3$P��
4. J
d' A35'£d'
t
i, $E Imp""

CIE
:'Y'Ipi ::1."..
pp �� It � � �i . �i °" 6, si
rl►�{d{�',�t
P j
tl?E �!€
g§
§ � ���'€i�ili
�€4
k p g
�I �4�� }(��
ES �
f 5�� p.�r�p 1(if
f €
fill
,
Is.�
y�
e,`:i
11¢1
14
i' ��I�I SS1 FEE a Pe S9 #iIIl� ; i" 4 . 4; ! r.l I Y •-: 1 1
hI
~+
dit gI'
g(�{pq
i a p Epp p Lz$ € 9g[ g a .}Y, EEtl g' ° p; ;4 i G
p P
} I
9�R
x g'
Ig
#4 -
€.
$
B7I.�
F.
1E`
�
�'
�I! 11 "pE h trt it €.f �I
b" f§
,47!' �
#� PE 8 a€E � (j� �.p'. rll� ? 3 �i • 1 �€h 8, � :� I } D s � � p « C4
is I
r
�.�§ .y
r
i': II
€s
�X
'yy Xr
j: 7 1 83 F
t
i
ppI
7
y,$
S
l
Y
�
`.�:.
k
�i
13' i
�,. E� • 3 ��� i'_a i 43 � f 1
..S �
_
py
1 I
C j
I
f � x. '
1 f: : s E t� , E3 Of9 E E
94
�
,
E
E
�
I
M` .
":
��
E
Cp.
4P
qlq
Ii7 $'
di
f
y
11 i t
?:
ILIo 10 o o,la
�F
IAs
€l;
�
': f
�- � xq aP- � ,,. � • � �# �1 ?�
q37
E
•yid 1 ffi � h�^ t 1 +a fi'. � � � ;• 4
t�
�� �
it
j �r 9 &€ II :
�'" �
�
9p
i e
i(i
'
;
8Fn€;jj
X ki•1
9 ' E �
r. jai I � � [.:r :��{ i 11i � : ! 8 $ tr ' I I Y�E c i # .rr � k°� • � �ifa �
*,�I `� �11 r�!# 'J !}+},�� - � Ei �i€ YJ J� -�i Fw► ii i
��"
..► I
,gg��!s
�r1
q.:.
�i
rg�
�J
R
i�
iP
$q @g
�JS
�rA4
i�
! {
�? j � �
'�" i;4�.
8 3
c.t i
y:( -,,di , I"
e4
g
1° Ni f j€� R f:ip�S fl �i} i3 6 3 ei• Pi: €
�€k�i�:,,E§4• �'.:E
E
g
E 1
1 f
i l•1
1 ..:
i s ��
1
'
a<,ll;, {�(�j¢{]e i({i_9 {¢¢; ,}}. �' „i'� .dd�3 !t
fj
�jCe ': EpE i'. �dkl-p° 6 .fy I
tAAAr^%;
§@,:�:,�1
Pt;.i
dFF
t�.S
9
`' E'
��$
y df
9d (F
Eppyyg
j3
H.
IRE;
�;;�?..,�f�
d. I
'' �,
p�yj
� ^ 1
.
±F YS
7
}
i}i•�
4
i4 EEi
It �x�� € p 'fir, 7(• � �s�$aa� ' [� il.:;., !� i f �.E [i� >•81,- dp ..
�"�
�lFSj
�8 n
if
Li�.>
;�
:
�ti
d - f�e
fi
�,, ,€ a
>3� ._ ? i� ��, 1 ,��; y
4 6 R1 EII p i � 1 g 1 � � ifj : � R� - $' 44 �
it
'3Ss
E
:Y3 Y
EF
� F?•P
E
� °I
k{E�
g
�ia�{
:�RRt
i
`Ei�:
d�p p
E � 3F j
t �
1-- �
E��
^t
�4qp(f5E iEA j1 {�{y{ E j3
',lf t� ER3j p�YEf E4i §Ii E...`'§d. :EE s^:. 1147
Apt,.,
f9�E61-'
oil
i kll I ft 00
�€ is n.. 'r0 E ti O C► �,�
i
�y
,I.
_
_
} pt II ,P i ��r �3 I ,� � P f.p,r II x k
t'"€$;:. tr}}¢1i 3 .0., ! O Q ::ljs IE E 3 pe ,' °€$Is E. ' ¥3"�' }} E •§e'a'
.
__?
`.tf .eP
$ If t
$
?
! i
E @ f
E
j
t
E .
�
..�1€
I"?H
fft
�t Ir'
.ffi'
!��"D�
'`
"f.311_
k . ,,,,
A
� �44�
1
s °. .ai E
��iE1 w Flit 'I�f ! t A, 31 p E I aF4 _ i_.
3 rE
i
�"::
E E
�°�
� N
$ ?
f �,
3 f
n � � �..
�
�f
dI
A� I .4•" 11
j ����, � !1 `� b §EE 1 "5. � � € __4 8 R E- & I ? i
f4 K.'
�iV
!�Xi.:•�S11-i�Y-
11`I
f:w.!
- 1
i°
1
:. G•
Rj,
E
+i:
r
{fly
(t6 ]�Lij►-
'a
Eps9
1.
9Rj :a J
"r¢�f. ! i. ��I: €'� f,•NF IvT ° 6;4 X�R°i ..k�iErs;3 i¢ O4 €� G
O:;
CJS-14
ii
$€..t:�
jJi
�
Y
3'1.4 [Ej �,.V� �ii (. }3p£F ". ii • ?E8 ! 1 1..: 9y' I: F: „£'. � ,; <d... E
�6j3
p'
p4B �
�
B
>°'.�
IE
'.1?pt
�j¢��ag
- 3;erp,-
t4'
d
6 k
I.i:.
E
� , 'Ei;
•
�
�$ k}i
�
S
..'�xii� �IF i.
� €
;4
tip
,b.
8�€
FZ
Y • e 3 I i �'�8¢� 'DblBlt F$� dF i' ! T sl y F
jjII I °X41°"d E Ix I. P :IEsIP d �p� t,TE�I ,t (PR7_I f !
t YS .7".. E3 i EF. E y �. •:
Ili CEjµ �E
(
d 1
'Ei•
� E
�l
�
1 -- I
�
i
t ��? i s ;_sae � ,� � �.I
•r1''.
O
}
�
A
�
} ,
�
7
�
Je . �Fy � •.i' � � w t. P� �,! ` EF �
R
{,
f-..-
1�
A ,
€
8 i
t a
0 11YYp$r{j�AAg� i
r r �
ffy"}g P p
9asC R3€;' fDxYf tt��f
°! a
E� !� Tr V.i �s•
1 N
a +jjAjF' jl 9 �x '8 � � r "PtipJi
: 7,I.,
tio,
c V j h
,ia�BPi y�fidFiEg6YF`.k+£S;I 'E
F:
s
.F
k} l 7 i { i' i 1
Y
r
4 ..
■

E`E gr�,
: S,j
!E
apE
(rf
rPz,.
{
p
r4 � Ip '! }y 1' !{ i �.1 1� t§�f
�i i m E ��, I f � bi 4.: �� �. ; °d° ` E � I iE 3r� Eb �, :.I.{�
I al r� Is . 77,. ° r r!l
mom
Ak?P3
{
''E� �
�.I �
!
@$a I E
ISI') ,i
P
t€€�''E
3+{
P�
�I�
I�i
a
�g,'.P} fjj/�p,# �d�ti• PS , ::( € g[j��yipgpN.€.. Eto.�
€..pt';:Sdr
flk
awl T NS -, II 4i�%j w?i$fd 01
3jP°
@ ¢i€E#E(}tpiE'
3{eEEEIgiEf:E{[Eg[} dtlil }9
e€aE YIi € E.ddttt} eppf 1 r , #Idifi :{( ($(63 '8��g? BI d ` t '§e! I it€: I & E. 81S(
,F f. ��} y F1i dd 3� Br !€ O€[s I IFI)
�'0 � rli 5":.� �!�r
€ 4irr
" r
iru. E
�'�
_ 1
3,
[
:Y3ia
E p�
;I
iE I!�. �
q• I
€
6.
1
` ItI �`,,,..
�-
lE.. E }jj ! !1!• "y11y i i f3 4i�E;� la,E �B P � � ' # ii �� �`# t?t � i It.+ .' +i
f
�
F �
1
lE!I{�I of 4 iP f 77E{ p; 33.:.� g'e' �E P,¢ d k ys�.. I Yi ii. h
3, 3 d ¢, t}Q E�E t! E. s r{Pt � 9 Ej � � { I _ _
`I -
�7
sY�
,}4 5f'..6
tr'
ii � �
pd E
��� �6
�
rE 3t E t a. a ,�
! R.
'{ [+� j`.i..yr �- b€
lt�.
�&!
e•
rp
f� [i i � 3{i�
•N �
- I �I !•i
i�"
€ e ,E
3( Q. Q
I dI � i
��
c�°
�►
6pj
n
I
irdF I
!
'''
tltl �
JAI
9 ,.;ff,iits E.,; [a[!.1
r`AEiI ,i9PG3
r,�t
il[
r gy
t
lj�d
d" i
d�g;8
Yi-R!
I
�i
?!�
•F
I;
i E
f. i
;9aF
� Y'
;
7xB
r j
i
(�#'iI
�1f
i
Ii
i J �i ..ii � wi 77�i�
E{ !{ I 'n7ij,
�
i
i1i
ri
j+a
iwiE
I
J
w4
.ai1�< � µ�7+1 , tF, N 1 ':!i3
�E
�r.l�
.
a
.}
�'� I. I
, a >
o tyi
IF �3
•r
1.
"own
0s,13 F7fg " gg ff``
F i 31 Etx �rP -- RBE � €! fl ✓� �i3 i r 3,49... I � s �i.ii 3 i li 6E� lF{ �} i3
jj
�lii
€l ��
I I
E rd�
d 's
�d )� i�i
, ��E�'.'
40
3..�;,.. l�dR (lS ¢j �f(. ril @�)p}1j�'i P:m�j 0'l 3p�p�.: p € y � � 'N
� C € p6 s� 8� Y3 ;3�� y� 1a�
�I`
d •
�
�4
i ,3�:I �{j(�'�' a
�d 'f 3Wlr1d � w i e3N 11 F(1 ti 1 ft 4 � � � h. h ��
E i
F s E i�n
dY{I €. EliiS �@ �., €4 :221.�,r lCibY �ire
•,l�3'�}S: f.'��I�. lip ¢Iii9 i� Nil €E. r;}� €. i'� 9.
Y
1
��
{�[�II
�i�
,i
d}.
.'i r
is i
P.
s
dF>
irl-
z�
F
s
,
Hall99"?�
3'3pi[de
�E+
[ t({ lj
Bb'€':
0
E
c
4 Y
c
dll! 81 if$ i'F tbE d 1 I��,YY4{{ 1 ri ' ri: E
a1� 1 4Pw' i3 Si p¢.
�i�
rkl
ti'
¢,gI11
E t�
l
•F1 ;1E
i
FI I i€i
pN
It
r'
f
i
77
.
useIME
i�''��
t °dE..
r�
raid13,;
Y ��
d��d
%
f
P €°M,
t 1
o�p
{i{,.t±;
'iPtF. pi' P§€':.i
F�
{ fig' �P B P�✓. pF...S ffyy�j jj§� � 3"ri 1 jS 4 _ 3 9 f i ��„g Cii3 f 4i7
vtiY�q$
Ie E'r:, �l @.�${§ Gj �61i frs,:
,dF
{�f
'} 7�
�It�
�
3 tF3�
P
f
E��9
i !
g@°n6*f
4Pi-i tr p 6k x{'N�' 9��i`!.7
�
`II f
!
i
'�
E
Ei�
t �i
1 �IIE-_88g
:: PER!,
}
iF
8b
€
fi E
d
ii
'' P
fn
S
68
3u6
�I I
i't h 9 i°E r
>I � �
icl 8
Id
C{i
I1
`
•'ems
.�
� {
)(( Ed t$ EtE� tHt '.. 'f3 d t� G► gg 9�
4'tll, it 16A }:
[ d
IE(3${:,
{�:�,
y
},
1 ! � � • � � N td, � � i
F
Y
miry "''�' r ` .+z.' } °-
f F 'AiI
Ai
f�
•J;
mum._l�P
€i sa
w7..ryM
k
r t °li
wyt
igsa
'aq°
1 ,{}!'�' � •{' I �rl # t i': .r� 3 E ,�
r{iN ,
1 �p.
B 1"
r �,• ,a. °€ ,'iy1 �i I t; #>tlj� I , 1€���€�P{ P �I.Y ���:,� i, �,
x �:. � � fI it ' }}'✓�,i

0—I
1M AON19A panIWAR v
At.
J�
I -A
- M
two,
out 011.
IS RM
UPI, Ivii! I
tj
®R us
1 PIN 1
f��i ski
11v4., 1,: j4r''Io�� , "�Jq bq j
Ilk M, i'll, 41,11
1.0
rA
I!� &Z
iak
A S 9 , I
IN 4 N
x",
Nil,
WM k
g
4 d Qi�
JS V,
imp
As low
, in
1��?) N;
?f Al�
too lif "Alt
gap
P:q
IMP
- 0- 1.; - ; t I
R,
a 4" x
I ti
591
Fit 4 v

!r§Lah € g
�
!�3 F � -.. (atiyvdr rR�,
NI ( a t, y 3r7.fRdii�- w � • Y-t},
•r:7s'a F. r {P� x kF i' 11 $¢F Fy�;kl � '� !: .7 f'EF �3s D:i' " 1pQ` gpli . R733 �' r �' Iti}, E.lr, ;a.i llE >tjF'lii�!�i3 r� - + � r
E 3#1 �F
',..r .€,.! I .;E: dgP @ n@•! "+: € rkl; ii! i�4 dd# �t - F �k .1 pp
n tf
i� Y. ' ;T r :e'a a I d I EII i € frY! IF 18 .i'6F+{phi .YFPd
i,.': :. F'€ d i' { 1 (' �
1 PR !E 'I;iI•1� € rR i[r3 d6.rr� dfd{� ��� ':8< .}d bf { :lNdp ;§C I i,' '� ,.E FF i- .- l
EE� d
7�,r F -E' iil f�'I � ��:, x Yea .1`. ,ak_ k�r I '� .i. " 1 •:a. !',-�a 1L.._ r<<'?` �i- id#3t -,'`!� `''. f
;' titj}fY'i a( i.Y t:• �kEl b=7 i. $ a r€)1 tiff! jSF..t,` `�.a 8 t ea@ .Ei lc��r: d, ?i dCi 3! ! d €� {E "E� 1 ': ', E�{ , I k' d.i:: �o e - ,x 'r ° -:.... .r; :,1, r. d n ,A a CI �., ^.' . , f[ � a R � c�"` -,�.`: RY. a `�:Fl ':,
!
P€:tkH j :iaI,4 14 yQ d it'.Whill.
,.; �•�j rI r_ /gi
i
,
F: t� !Will ; #3lij > g ;,sd!;
.� i`
1!i ¢B,d,'i7a '€�E Fs?x' d-
�
���Illal€, txax;;, ;i' I?$'E ## l�, i d£ f€! ttdf,((.i jj F1 £.. }} d a ((::3 E j -€ 4 •. tl £ I � ..r !-# i" �� Edo' �: � r' �'-"."'s dd (( °
Wf 'i {P F v. Fit 4 F 'i PI VA it d�. €��£ E3v$' 3dF 3 ?d I >d RF.€ it Per °P��i 11pl E.EP` ��1 • �F,- 1 ! :: £ 3s F 3 I..'F 'dir''•
-'I'
� � L k
{ Yt7I,)t I p��!t �I I: `• $i r!f I' i {r IP P 'I (r : i ie' ti409
1 � # i[� �,"v Fsi
I q !F 'E' F 4 F fs g ,z
II ,e) e£ Y, '.r:..a k f `r�i ff - " _. `'� i �:_'� iE .air F�:t' t, rG irk I,r,"a�aF;
7tta
li: •=(f � ir. i':, Y 1. fl:. � t IR�P' Ei Y FRf €.?' r '8 l!ls�.i I t rb [€ -�;a $� ,`R'i p�. �F �! ?' '1 3j rF` '3t.� i
i. y. F+i
§ F
fYl#dt {I ?
�.
E#fr:
f a P= Y::R! �F R P i d,. Bad i k d irn s Pt aa' : d
k 4 J-
! K k CFI rq E !! A f n
E ii� t"k�,! ` wd 'd fifi' I s #F !
." d ! I f !i €w p f r �; i ii aRyk .°,;:: 3 V _{{d -tE^ r°EI 4 5 d -aiF - F �.
g rf r
f 1 s f P. g r�
°` kr! t £ EdY �:; u. !
,'
ErG
r
�-,'�
at t Y d
-.f I S° Y tee t d91 1 i
d r p } {gyp g
t" a T w '
�
I
e �_it� !r 1{l {(jEla Pig P i-aEd ialY - d .!d f rg 5'd: £ r3,t. Iplg E r Rs ,9 ,z. r E I
P ,► :s �� rx {u � r S ,.aG «,w !�>. s .a ';`i ',xl :s, ;w►; d..t.�,:.' ,�^ r g
¢Fit €'¢ lE �e -�,I�t {€ 1d � = s d1P r. Eag "? A.r� ,€- ' .�.' � sr, ,•= Y I u �.,:. I. � '�3 1 ER d.,�,! :'#�k d `�> , rjiE : IF py 'ta C , `,';� .
yp f > (Pfpji iiili{ dtFa°,?dpr € r �.
I ! (a l! Ey l$a d
€£gi
''3 t 5
,„...o--a.+•. ��— r• F `"�
l_.,
"hl E lYJ, l
fir., I
�y. � },. M�£ �I � �F�F I !I'Oil
"pt� -FJrl. 'I:
�!ai Pr j+Pd 1 I PP;
.,{ �d ¢ €, i#; z
d:h-i.lg i r#6
F � t
':` (j , iir� E±1€r € -�d.. !� Eli'..'{i z %' f =` "� ar �"�'trlj:
I' I'
'!j itn ��.
' f pj �S y tit {d , :da r.E.E tP 4ix%a IE
zd g
f rf.;E E z r r i s Sz 1 .:r�:`j l F�,E t,r f ! z'N
t f r R
� - �
.ca,
EOr.83 Ail
QY _'' ; C�; A _ ,a a t „{• ¢# dX.
r F: Y
. �; g� l x 3 ?h � ¢ r ':':�' F � � ;. !d �' r = :. '4dtE , j •di yY
i E i
' ,�� t�7�
r! 1 j ! (#+rda i. �,ia.« t9 sr (:bPz3 •^= E F a4 d {a5£z , 7'" E: # # p r, r aw �. s ., - t r, ,
�
� �
E iki
d Orr'
F@ e 4
sM
d
d.:a
?` n } !d g f W�..M �jr' r � �_ f 4•
�pp �f�. d.
I 1 8 f'
,g I r 3 ?? MI.. ado, l'' ' r+ {
, l .i:#+ --
P,
�!@da!
E r qq I .w ft•.E, 1 a '.i€ € a L
spit d z:< Lw )
�
r ,
fr¢.. # ,
F
€ " a Rtia C3 ti F ,•r � � � s � �.f P � e�, i � �_�' � I C s.?k� s. €! �. �' tf !a !` ._ „f ( � I, Ptj� 'R� "d it� •-+� �� ��a
lE: :,��#i€ F�Ff 1 I?•,�::,a, Rj z dd`# 4 ::,€ = r r 6 d � W P. � � s dd. » °r YF '@'dP b i. -
tzp
'a
V:
! s 1%i1d r.. +tiAF Wj W s Y;!;e,aF�! t !x??'iia''E #d.sgrt £a Y r YpF•
Lt a R w i y` �b' a tips i==7i $ l jdI d ,t'BYtdll r;:
L £ r ) srd +x rai}tr sz t
2 ti£77 3 - w R L ,� i &
?`£.='^ id°r, Es,FtFr E,fga @l,ilwF Tel I�P;f
, Mft !
it-_ F r '� [;} Y �, .'dr;:r' i f?�zi # ° :i .. ;pFF r ,oaf is :aF�d ii.!° . ,#3rr: +`•.., 4
` r r pd�tE Y "RI
dR;°r + !
'ty,l ��}y���+#C7,�¢I yp' FRYdd•...;mf.7 ,sP ,.:.,, '"' ,�. ��ro+-��.
iss - a 4.z Y�F P di t t 4 �ri5��

1
z�i
S!
J4i'z€-�t.lI€dC,slri;i�}i]ftPd('rzp
`€
r„p, 1
P�
v .. �;. �.
�•{.
f's lt1itE f _ p ^Ik, ' ££ kY f ? ]° x °!
7ii 7yy7)) EEi:;
�
g
t
�
�}
� '.
1 }
V �
Jpp 4,
ci `�'
w'AiY.. �,
:`9.�
,:
A ll.:
{.gg.�..
r i,
E I
(4
�
t } r! 1:. IP 3 'I
,,..E
'ik;
�I •
M}
-!
is.
i y
y
i. Spa 1 �
a £ {I
6 z1
tra
$ C E $k 11�,
3
}
iF C!
pj:a
4'
E-1'
'.� 1 1 rn f h fi
r_
J
a
IJ€. I
P
Ya1
r E
:`
.►"
i ii
Li N �; .
�
r 1
h
,;t to Ali:.I. ]€ .d9.+Y"� tri
,:: €: Jill,66E Pd $ $,
A l _+�. r ', `-�4! d'7. : € E a, l
YY 0i P
]..�.�°
P,l �:;
1!i
r'
�
(:
€
s
::€
a
<.P:t
a-
k pq
i
i.
°+1 ,,,",r -; •>s
k. �@ `'ra'Y
'k ,.t,
g_w
f�1E
ha.if
e
i..
!
"fig $$ f {t7pqq !' (. s',q' j§£
ry,a E $E >@gEN. f € 1 �; dCie`
, .P 1 iI :.�: i
iY) .°
3
;11D�`
fY Y
€3:1
sri
i $F i
1,
@
i-
i
E ,p
-'P9P�1{{
°. r'
E6rF-1''- ' P'...
'';j£,. £`E'4{�ar,
f7
}. 1!''
11� �yfAi {rf :,� i �Y � �! f.i• � 'a ^t e 1 Y � �:&G P �ii a
'V. E�;. �
�F-P;
�,:a
,�F
�.��
F';r
: f,
.i;
y .
��i
�'
-
- i £
A
f
ai
E
i
�rF'.
.'_
6E
ire.
�i(ii:
1_a.
F
{:.
� ]
, a.ef{�4
sl
'i'a
_�qip„
,
r
f
SI,
. . {I
{
E ?yf
{ #`
�, ,
Q�:$
] 3d : E y-
B_
�!
_•i
i
�' �' ]..
'
Y, -
9A 7
a_.. rr
,1 ',
E1 1 ] D!1 :�.. ]i:; ! 1:'_ !'3 ti :t. ^]! 3Is'< It 5•!
is Ea �` EiCEI � t� � p�€j tE ��a• t +P`F€+,x f . ii c,�:: p -€,Ex ; f �1
$.
a
! .]
_ $'
{
ip '!
w ;:
a
=9d
?,ij
£ D
#j
FI
3E ;
S
[
�ss
.:,FI
1
i. ,
E :
,gg
,}Pj}
��
➢'. ' E}i - pr'
$ ?, pp: ',
iS t ;y
f•
!;!?3A
+a, ] '�,PIFfi ! J,i .! E E' 3ti '.$t,r
i ai (!!'
Enz
1�7: � 11r1` ` 7i"i¢, : €: €., , .li.lt.d ej�• Dp.. ]� 1d¢ ,
Ef.r
; I,
s
» :�
Cfii tP
t(.
1',
iF'.ldl
3" e
�P,t
i 3:
FE
��j:
i. 'll
i�r$i',
3
iti�li
iwAi
H
«ii
E
I
h
i 1°.:.
�<E]
.i&,�
.IF3
I j
':ii�E
Q.. l={;
� I i i�
9ti
'
»
ki D 1 P. 1
Ix•',
�,''
Ii FEs°:' Ky
k: i g'e
ikL
t� r i 8r4F.:�. <7 y .:p ' y
r
IrIrr j ,y, 1. 'Raa
`" 3333q P . 1 f
ayFJ)I ii
9i E Fi.. Et id ,E i 9 iIp pp@ fA 4 p 9i° r EE '1 i f,3a8' y:x Pj t
y pv f £t € E } 3
r �
3 ` 4
`,�>.�
1
..., ��
tY
{tt¢£€S.
'Isie:iF
i4(
€ r
3.
-k
$#$
r-.'",,+
...
E . 3
4 ", YE
_a5F
p
-r
�'
[t P„1
€ Ix
-
r
i�F
t. Ij
- R.It
P .FS
g
[
t £�
-r„'P
-
1g -i;
,'i_
-
!
.MiPEJ
i
a!
P
,f,. E,.
s�
li::i,
�
] g
��� �'.•
i P• �. �i. '��i
� '�'f`•.
'!� r � �`� � i �rl .r-f _r
3 tQp'�:7 .iOi Q„€ �.if Q.€ Q , .ri`�'a td E Rf.
!" %..E!° l 8 ! t {£ 1j, € ....1 P
ii ; i jp k 3 t i.] Q
n�y9¢
p
€
rf'aI
O..�
p
f
wa
i
Es
kr
i E
�fj@
t'e:v
(
1Fx
l { : €
�i€
d
yi$ y€ .t krN
Navi l fr, .: ilklt{ {�' fR' , j1 °€J. is ' 4
n ;: I. '
(
-iai
31°'S5
,Gi
�'!!!
i.i.
Dh�[
�li
�:i
€EF
]e
iED 1
a
R gf Iv<E�_
)
a& ; I
�+@ E.CP1 m ^d �i/
e r
$ iS�
i
1r rP 1 r .: d
<.gffl. EEt£ 3I 318i::t6 @@ � 1i£ E ,! in
,:€ :..E, € f , pry °. p'r. €>F..f.:3 .r€,jB„ ,¢ € t';P E ii" i ¢a,
i"' t ¢ I .° i ytE .Flirt : t s is9:.:, 6 t
�i
i C>�.f
. vp'.,.
IP
!€
'¢ i`('ii.:s
a � 1p
R
;€:fE
@:€
3t I
'iA'
: 8�9
ii?t
{
a..:'
EE ,
3
ii§
1 '
P..
...:.E
?
i
�3]€
e 4'
dEE
:. e
1
E iltr
".:
g§
1P3_��
} J:: . P ' 1 ^
[,q€ j i
4if il' Ij i O
aEdd6S r€ i
i.: p ':il 14
EE.E-.$_.N3 E i ': Y Er vel 4 !
�i. td ¢•. ]
t€ '
:lf! i€
�'
1;i.'
].
id@
Ex
f
r,]
t', f
fii
Z
[j_k$ „[lIGY �
3
E€ I :. r 1 f:'@e
�rr3 Y �
N� a
t'YI[�.[ il,'.
PR_•-.P
i :,
v:
A -:
it
�
�
i't
�
[f•
€€{ 31�: €€r iq$ € r1 . :.L ': il_ ri':i °wRs p� ..Jr°A t
js
..11'!:',.�
�
:
ri
w►
'r.A:
.i£
:J
.11,
is -I
1 ,a.°.1.1 t[a:
Ei:ra4 'YNfi1E P$$.`- i�9 3
ip
j
pRtF
ry
°
•.Y)�1, �• t E f ! , EaEB,P�i i 88 !', N F�t -- p �. .. A y ,,j;1 3+
r,
_ ]
�:.:'
{t H
£/
#EPFI,
E i s
a]
4<,1
i°
v`:�
.Y v;
:xr-
3-
"
i� �i'd
-
.:ii
I
f r.
j
�1f E S g .
C ryhj�
a •', dd
t � a' �,�`y"� F,y� I "F E+ r a r-
•'
I:j a:
�:
a
C
,, .
,
3E:;i
7C
p
1
!
z
li
}r
y
]j
Y:
yEEjjj' j �` 1
CP f :t,P ,#E $-a di Ef :Si $ ,4 E d F $Edd AEE
q3 tq '€i}1 $ d
3 "' R _ t€tiY i c� ( U k
F�
h j
7
'r F
1 his.
E {
p
E ��yyy
4
j sf £
--..
T
.?.r
i.
-f
'n.:
Q1
�gB
!di a 1ii d,E r : gdh
'I" Z
'' g
Ek
I 1
$i
��Y}A'!.
I #
{ - a
:
;j{.v
is
r y
�d
d
t
ii a_
�
3(
� „:#,< Sa { r
�O/�
'»..x xP°Ey,�,}� _ .i �. .� _
f]i 1
!" (.i?"3
.RaP
d€-
i
-
F•HI".! � ''.a$� ! � :.i. ;:�4 E31�1 JO, f�€ Q � 0'+ �
��
°Ixdti
€�f
i ;DE
:ice..
R
e
.i
II ('-
€-
'E
�
T
':FI„„??
p�S }
Fa..r, t
1 ..1 6 i} .:F:;
I :F i Y ,d, $t{
$
rf
P>€
q
Tj II r T. i 4. I::.;,.I ° , .�
:`
+ r
F x
r
F$
j..a,
Y�
✓'.
:iFr
iEl] I'f1 :
iIsi
K,x
�,,��kk xf h �, ,i t.'. (�i e�., FP , f P
l,yYFY it rr!�� { 33E iN jgpyy a t�tj_ I ���a 8 E -8i Edy' - 9
:1,, !(}S i d' � g�'C :aE i EIEi. €e E 4FF } Y� p3."= "`I&1 8.�6s: - g f 6 iii• ; t : a,
�'l,'
�,
°e
,
(�..
. $i`,
:
Q
f
Q{
jj!'
Q"
s•
))ppligY,
a
3 I
t t?s
} a_'
:{sdd
:. ilk
3i'
(�
`�1
(
�f!
Ip �t
�._
3
rI
f�¢
4�5
,i..._
I�.
hl �
35�
rY N
I$ `i� - .] ay,
'�+� v YB�.
E.
- •:
- p �' : � � - 1�
-
l: a$ i � Q. � � 1'- ! i
IF, 1
,N ..
�
A
4 f
♦ 1
'YMr
Iv^
S
i�'a
I�r
3E E,t4 d P.:
f
i/'
,iii
d I: ri. E; ] E
�PYo�
••:rs _.
a
,Y 1,
i pp
#gy,,pp
i €..9
a..
:i
tM"i
;..'
-E
is1 IE E
]
F 9P :1,3 5l.
l
i e
5 ] t �,
_-
W
iid^
i
'�i:
€ e.
�y
f l
I::Ii
�
E
,le pE
`
}�
P a. i;
E Ri-a .
f
�j)¢
!'PE'
•.. .
S
F
is P ibF
9 €A
3] E 1 }} 1,
. i!
1.
r _ k}•s!} {
7
E ii
p
r�P i' >E9 © ice° '.G7` @e.�P p l,' 3Pia+) �
77
��
1
r rri-
E� C%
i =kr
E6.ig
€
£ Y
#
fr -¢P➢1
d.
�
�J
§�;#
'�
¢$� E
{/'
�ry
E F��,�4 ����� � Ei�l °i
E
; dd E'{.�_1,"�. �^jx
dI3. I i `STp
",.i j
N}
:
r
�
4'liltiz��33 773g
iP'[p� at $%Ii tYjy�jx I]).F&-r^
i, ga ftI
i
i�
]}
g
i
h
i1F',P
1018,
yr �gt}}
U
.�
4_r
i°Ee(���}%rI
;{f[#
�Id@
y8Y
IPiYgl�� e
w Yak

yr
GA ',$ Tioati
yI iq Q" 1 �,ja€ ,
� !«" € :. .� • S 9 !� -a3. - EY•. E 'fl ., Q. �Et ' �� ;6 Y h..., �E �� iS3d�j.. f,. Sji f p g„Y _ a�; ,�
'9 " ; , f " li €'pY"; r• e°P.. � c4 4Pi E < ? . .. . °e'd- } @�� '3 4 ' sd;, ... € .� # . � j € '8 ' S55 � ;E ,,@ r �9 ":, L
Ulm,
."P: iq : i .: 9p � � '• ��, ![. � � {�fi ih� ,8°+ f k: �, �. ;�,' z {J.�� � f1 (p5gp@ [pQ�S� qy€([ ( "��d.
- S YP-'-
�.
•
f�
!: }r?d 't .] , , '�� � .E ..a�-1j§::.r ...< <E �. Q..°.@# a kc- a g'i. {� � £� ° �� � ,.,�. 1 ,.ii§a:. 1Vi f '� •.
Q$ 4;
4 i; @ t (.
I g� s€ p( is ! 3t q° €• � i{I
f
d •.I b 3 ti f Y � Y k � I Y,.. a, � r
i
� t
I.i�
fTp��I�E € sa a :. Y€ �' E m €i-:� Q�.. - l::€ ",} .: r : '► �', - a' € i � I : is $' i n
r 99
@ � i�• ,` l - ' !if is @ .� S � � ��{ f.ls��< : @ r � ' tf s E; ; �t ,.. `f' � � - E � @ `i' N E ' ` � � ¢ "' 'II < : i r -,: �, �{
7 €# „]i€� €E � d E , si �, �� •€ �. � 11Q i � f,, ei I i ;� s� r !E € x E � �s t ��Ifft F {{{ 9 - -1� i x � _ S1
7€If `: �. i. 6 6.( II :[ qi .P�t £NN g • pE'�K£ 1[.s,i. S ¢(s - �b £. f?:-= pk '[`f � �� ��. °! � Ap `€ ! E �� � S�
a: . t. E �: 9 � ,.I i , t i •", ggt € �� I::r; a i �. � S. I ' - � Pl� � € � qq
j f V<• " t � ° fl' €:. f iE i k !3¢ - aE i @ € a R d d p 4
a @tl
,' �{;yk�3
a.€� -: �) V (,-
!I� € � . ° € j iP z
a7 € + 1c�`4
n {+ rt
�. �' � ". e �r, ik � 1 { zP� � F"' ' � •. • � r 'r
All,
,g@ €hit
,
€ ,y a! , il^ P E @attrs.; �tt , _ ' _' t��, f p, . �' a ;z. € z. :� ".:w ?" ��:,,a , a •€
' i,@
"tEE,q?
r'iC1 i t7 pCa C9,E I ,€ „ d pll: E 3t 4 r P l; i.
}}��!'
i; Ikl
tI! A Y i a V f
t1 d+5 qq zra i"t
'q k4 f
:<•€
rM
r.i `(i:
;, I *
MP
jjjj
F.�f
i��� < Y6 L [ E� ° a�5,g .€,'f ,.:€ € ":: Ex• � g9 a €,f r :'?; E � ((�. ,
9( !t I i F i.i:, -3£ ' t r .1{�3 i a.qq Y {p� 6 5 Y V.l I E d•..:s1p P:."..�.
Lie: £ ( ,t kl .:t Q #c°.,, @ •I "-. ' E i €�,.. <. t t $ s§� ^ , , 1., dPP I.
':, ¢ < i•• �Eqg': � ,.,I - t� :.:3�.:: ..':r r � €... l gg� a 31t Y � €i �§zY .t.d; $_ ? € £Es§ 3 €.•.� ii€?. .,. � $}rE "pt { r I'i �: Q' � : bE s � `i:, d::_ _ -,�Y - ti.
f E Q e Os a ;. Ea rE x,P "r a E::. J -i6 € _ S d t u ° :dx I ?�s!•a €Y7 ,;g 8 r8 tEEt€ r: 4; €._ aid :: 9� 7 f f ;. �4.
g "? `£ Q- p {; >.. F ° ; �,.. i I° r;:F #! } _, ![;
4 f � i� I try
�' ". '.I� � j �i,• " a` t _ ,�, - � �j 3 _:w.a,? - - �., .
G�.w O,
fig# iti 1•! z '� t,_. it ta::w d a kR �" € b C >p �`•.
s.
6.E__ .. ���� ! � it �`@i � !� dp Q �d' 19A i�i " f' . dr C .f '�.jE ..: E -, 7 ,� @ £� 3 F1€ F-;•: ! i.- - E " , ; € e: v ! ! - �i rM: � "� � '� -", , � ! t
•;t �¢¢E[[ }} 1.• 1 ;Y{ a E €, ,� i 7r r3 E(. r,,g�9y € .g�a g F z ,€ � {E ,, zsr 1 _ j t`_ I� <� l�'�f w��y Ci?. : ;lkS"3 � iiEE ef)i� . y.°'� =a ii �� "Ee' : y ¢,-" - >'y ,
t p •4, 3
pp jq@Qei. iE @ ', ,I", ppi a. ! aE a83¢ . a 'gyp , �j,ric€ i'Mrv, '( (t Et,f -i r� 6; " ;a@@ t F
M' °?8< Ea�. d Ea �,.@ Ia 6 d. t Q, 3S
ii�! E,eC
`; I" � .ii.i `. {_, t?,. • t ,¢ ;:
.�r� .€i t- -r',I E-_ a9 j' IqJ aif`�a?� +, ". s ��' �!, Y3 �E�. �& €'�# '.'g. � �Ef a, �: ,< �?<.' � 1j "E•,-�€"�€i :`##p
z
!V i'� f T''�- � 14 ,. W �•'g p �'i " h I. �IIQ (FY" Ap �i
s�F•'
f }";F i" .. ., f ^ w" "y ' k. •; " a ° 9 N � � ri s � �' "9 ?"
€ijer.j§&Qr
>� �, � � , > I ; t. l� € @;�'dt� l� € . ,. i '' 3apE°;� . €.� € i �:?' •fE 1 .. � �' 9 !, . ,4 O, a0" �¢ Q' ' € °' , i ^ r pb € i f. € : , I" € `,'�, @ €=Q in � a';,, .i` �'
3' •E:'�'' �€ i r :: � @ O'i 'CJ E� € ¢� Ap >._e ild � -� E .EE � Q.. ¢ , •r,ip ut `� Y1 �9,i,, E f ,i, " €.:€`: <, , ,
a- � Egg tf iaa.
If i . a ; s t'ip
� { € d°
J co
At
"IPiry
� 3i ,:. i j i i dd °� P 4i �I I �d P �I€ 3 �' ,.. al O' tl.►, .a :Cj i 8 - ,� i + �, i i .
. 3,�. I t !"'" , ; li gi -f� rs aY%� f --, f I � O;a: � �: @p Q ' Q�. €'s Y; t�p'• � i� �� �" �I:. ..-:.�` 'tA. �� et �� .`j i ..
g� r
4, 1
��
P-
`E,' lad _
`�z' � i .�
i .
"pia
tp ":6 li'i 9£ s ja E tlf B, d 1 t i i yy '; i z ly, 4
B r 3
`—
ir, + r ,
r }i "
! c ° ekaV E p.
Ei9 f I it . ; .#t "q' €:_,• # i t'zi Q i 14.€^,.a -:I'
tt{ � EtLk,
€
J$.
E € i z jz. Ep `+ _'d�¢ �! s
6E itEet, jl" F � gt$�?- g@,. £ p!I �a8t� ,� ?�a i. Q91 9 � �QB'e t-�ri °t, 3'° g6'< E{�(i rA f E¢€f� I ee
"�y €' ££ €-.: :`p E E b �j ¢ $' ¢ 339§ �.:E l c V- i pat: dQ@a I g jyi �€ y, Ep��`:::
"..#ki £ f Y { P'4d s3f € 'a`£} i { E t5£R F Q
p pEz
fi;id<. PP €k
J..
"�" a� !�V :� � � ,i E 4 9 N Y � x �`. Q a:. �h ;�. �'. •I a �{ ! I # .3 E 1 7
�� 07 ,,.iQi ,�, �,: 1'�}r£ ^�: �� +*" �' fif€ � a - �� � "ram ?��•' t'Y�� + ,.`�y � � j
•}. r. L� t

eh a t c Idf r a 1 71 aliw?lf E >:` :Bj r ra3 1)�` c �r aaB ai z a9 ra d' ,49r} §' d �$+V�g �§ s!! g 44{{
Y T ? W i,. t ik 1 S S i ky r`jF lktr .€@<iE ��9 .,� � "1 Ry4�. 0.1 FP?�'kllsa€ ''F� b :. 1
ill t° f O �C! g k, Er Ir
;:ars$ :I �'d 3 3:. a .k , ,i i� B ` t '7.' 4 -
'3M '.. 3 ��'� "f-- E B ttar j.. cE "',t h ;a ¢ ) =I f r•,. _,l
5r d
�k.z
'�€ € 1: i ,: € ':8. E 'I ; fs , .> t � ��""w``E .e° I� i , E � � ,pp� �i� .:a' �{ �E�,1� k '8b6 � , k �FtTIF f 4 �e x'• �}� `�' ] t
'}g i
'36 Eat 1. - 3 d`0 x :aRsz}- � k 14 fY € 11 � i '� .,��. 1. # k �. jQ! �p' ��` ,�. •. !h.::` � @ rE] �$�,r ��I�diY,° � Itd.. Pdtl �R dill i iib;;fd� P°sr1; i�aaill, ��.+.r �IsFfi. .:
r' t (, t ;^ 3d • � � "+ �, - � I r'k � + �I ,:nv :� V � � �r. Yi � i � F ° !S= � 9w 'fit ;yr ,TI R rFfrlllddga 'lain � �€ r t
�'�- ir. �. Ei " ts=±+a .d � `E� $f�,�l�" IP,u �$Ia,,'��E r¢?• 'r�..E� ilid iE P
a a pk, I [w 0t �a
Er.E i':
�• �" d ,• °; k �, r
€ €., $` '_ oa i i;i t ib ,tRi � i. ^;$i 'i E � .!P f.. YP, rEssd,rr .rdsa,, E7. .1d1 ; 'B ¢ tp +" •E' ' ,�i.e Ir t d r E F r
£d i 1
1S€ -e$' •Y '� ^i Y{Sy=. W��k.. .'k f il. Y, ,l'.e 1 [FsE li ..#:e•:. R{.� ,'6 y.f i rFS#, 4�{-
$;!;r$i>,. i� # v ggg
,'r p..r.Pi f ;( fh tPa df: E €�? €: ef: ia$-.I rrtF • !Ergg ° j't€t P. 4, €€ t> E ° e , ; 1 ! l• n= r r
Idi'
{ 1`•�rt.� _.. i� a - k <,1�, { i S t �' —.�, .i" f i�'°`I�a :, _d�l,. .y, .w�M € �'
i' £•:r�i it I; �. �tf d� d� :� �� �€! I �,-, t � d ''E;, E". � r �. e;;"i - r - i •
€,, +.• .?
r nr ii1€? �° it a �� " € i .. 7 �r.. j.o
pq-:p' .!, �ry sd. 8 iN �i •£"' , . ,Ns—,
{3 � �,"
(y,: � tr •kf i - , �} �`s � rF �, , ""� Et �>i h:� tl a i:;l� �a+; ���;;t Ydi�E O j �1 �f. I� { f>=` ' � E ¢�� ",�i � r [( � fill
a
e E N ,€ry4+,t,+ �, °
d'
I:i E, 1'I a w £ r 1r� � P°6"€=€ � •£' �_ $ E °da at€' I. - e , �� ` s § t��= ra ��, ':�=,1 x'L `r!: a ;�1 r .
1.1�;.€. E.r.�, aa9glr. [[ •=. c> ; � �Br,.: (('f .��I �'"
3d.
1�'a .("-�.P!
f'-
E,
t of "G.,man
, `. ( .i cB : f•f,:i € a . + : ' . ,
��!r
H�A ✓pi> a t„:i �i [ 'tlpp�:E s 't '.�S sj�° �7 k to _;t' £t E
I'di €,��. §�t�ff�: ee a-. .. ,r� ��E; :I�E�,� r. ��.� ��_...: r F�a :� F° t' .� § - € ,t� C�, "�• r#�I �t ¢, �"r UfM; ,At ar ,t'. I�€�',_ i � •; I�
pd
�I R , ,� .c'� m �, iE:>•: ;- I tl 3.f '^h ){ T
3e
�e, R' garI P
'4s r �1$ i PBt a�' s 1st.. d :.� � °, : -"i la = i '. x � •,� r .
�I:c •E� §���. E 1¢E t j E !€�pj, i - :! } � € t, a r ;. n€, E € i E �.•x s!! r �
° � , t �P. ,�': �.E[� ;�'�>! r � t .foP¢E+ ¢P1 ? :'ii' E ',$a € �[�i •1j a a 1 � i r.q ,<. O ar, EE
ir.a3( Et ' ?>
��; :'�. .a. ���t��,
pP•:.�'� ld!''t l`' �� � s � '(ti-# a'<?i'€ ., i � i .'; _�' I `'.+.:.ro.., N..►a., :t-i . r !.. fa E;Ba'1.�:� �¢�€�� x<. .r-;. . s .>b=
!� E� H�•, l� i� �! €�� € {i€ �((< � 1,�!• > �p t e,;p a@d �P; EF:3§ ? st1�+ < ,, i;drPE � a =dsi; t 4-#Tier. r3 • # '. !, , ;r € s� �` s ., J e�: �:�C, 4 � , _ t E �i:,,�` • x �;� rl i# ! ._�,"' '8 �° r;.l€; �t E � a� , C � ¢ t(°`, i • r� d� ,,� se�°;} '� � k.'PE " ;�o�. '�€ PI # i,E r 'd �t`k $ � I rp' � �p � ' r }.. {. j� ,
8r.. t €€E"}•„Ld. <
E €1 �sn d�;�@,r �dt i, ',r ^; it
io't tl _ ,•w kt. zE E4.{ k Pad{,: .i i; tr!€tta;' +e I
! 'iy r �!? tr� F k -�`� � `§ ; t � ;�..• v € di $€, tt iirdidisf ° ':8 r,... -,
. € n� •'` -`°� k
11 ,.! t( rl rr,,..� r le , ,.d�E q} t •I,? gc @ 7 : , q �r� t..; �ti E. - -R�.:. s Ilsdit, ills
t � 3 ttP dd {d $ € :�?$$i it
I:?: - tE � 'h
�° ii[1,:d' h; d diPds;tlEa€E adk,d[pl�dEdiFi
��•'7¢Sf 1 ��.ift €tp �F€ I ��I x� :�±='.Q �7 �: !y E:�'
s:'Eiu1 t a ! Sg a fe ' ° _ •'.iui 'e=# $ _ (.d�', ''i ` rF'PJ 11 if VIP,
�Pt �eE F�t '
.dIga•'4:{d y
} JJ
MIN€€ j7 Jl i _g "�
�f ., Oil10,11 �r
1 t t g41kf g la ; td # gli, z IB[ �}
t E s B x
t k ie� P iki:3 Ei e
3 d5 ) 7 d I 2s 3 iES g 1 '
� �, F ,ka r.' : e € s :1 -
�. ��, l} i, t t rp Nita 1 �,
, rr! W J a $ E {:#�, !r i5 �E'b a Lp j - -' ' € ' _` c - ''i :!}Y' !yd 9i,.1. E i F
3 Y!p : •£`, 3� i �. �' .:i 'w\p i „w1 J i4 �.i3• r� .>►x ri ii � ,rl� W'e i '.� :ii a3) . >- !•�, df.f E !.. :PlIP -
i� r, i't t' i 4
p., , is (r a dli { 3psE talt'p F e ds,cd .i,Tti•.w,! i3a € ,I E I idY !" d
13
E r.. r V •, it ac,+, Ik y 'a, ( c ,_p K $' dd '.:I lac ¢ ?'-' E >�E t S x f €d£".. €^ a ♦¢. E` r „ i I _ a
'�' ''
t F F • w �d ri :1,=,i ! t •��. ii ., ( d E l p I��Yi e,g1t tat? ff it r ii Y.I 1; rd' d ;.. I !, + � �. 7
'1., �: � �- :� I € aiea. r, ; . y ' e` c= r$t 3� . dr x I gt#. Id �t:'x€ �bie ! ; d a dI 't- "- Ids r aaeP� .. 3 t '•, f1. IR j -.eaa r i
won
i a rf E.t. E #`
: d•. �F � IE y'€ � � • E� Ik� � 1 .f � t
icy' s1�ppl i#Ctltl�l+tE`d (1pE 1'E_ Ei'dE( s3�tJ 3: f''t i ! [�,(;}: M , :: 5„_ +' �k' 3 ✓+ r R .a R P€t r idn �3@p¢ I 'Ir i3 s.E,
oil�ag`3 i•§Y`.d: it f° � E � "13 R 1. � E'- j p a nil [ y e p'F.. G Y � d
)t�,I ,: �j E+ x k" �s §�.i �eyeka EEEj' 3£i: t E fk :. IEFt{ Fd £ i �,t.: E. drI Q .«�I I i i' kFo ..
1 I" .°§ Y7 i t . � r '. �ras. ;9�! ;. 1a E4ii�rt, -t�;i s - '�: � t err- Iti .�; a �a;�€S3x�'. 0' ,'1, 1
d;E +' E' EL j r -1 ' :' EE , �j '> E#+ E111: #'
ttpp IE<r ;f t �± i '�-p; rat e?` d '.i t@ l' , u, a
�a�j :I�. - e -'s, ,:r.• Piidfda
_�-
ti p�E a k�� � r a (P r ,� , fi �." ` � f�:' °� �. wq psi k r :�a w i.. f'a,:�x d It �I •tf�j-,! ,r�„ ,.. tta I
:. E ttdi = € Ei df;(dr pl F t tl( fle er t E j t" $ 1: a r ti i r.
.�: IT -
ply
J E - it::`�a` r.e z'dPREt „fix 3 .;'- m
J i( ud Ekiikr £It i�'r:� its., i '"f 3' i 77..
d d �f3{t,., •f:t # p€.€ dE <j : 6 n �.�i i
-
g.:44'""F�✓3'
did d( �f [ d t/F"j7�idkl E i�ieRd a I.I £ifi I€ I f1€ r# k �% t I J
�Z1 '
f£ a: ' f E�s � y(' is e aE% !�z€_i , � i �� 1, ' ,f. '� 't i O, O` ,� O i s. d. K '� (. I <[rf p�$I d : i Ed1''i I�€a d j� ,a-•; 1 -
°
+ ia'� , i ,ram � a „e': , r r �+' :. S, .,b a t dP�f. 4. Ed (� Y s= , E�t§ a€ a E � Sp #rdta{� E € d {�€7 ;±t+j l' � . g-<;• 5'� s fig{ � -:. 'i.� n Y E s � r � e -
€;?;T7(j#(€f�{{€.�=•�'tgk#1{tar:-�.I'
pl,¢� t iE f: t. }: ��•p'� 3 l ;��{ f �ta �j � ! t 4 i� a �', t 3 a d3 a r ; ! 'h ,. r i d o - L y �gj t--`q� ,
1 r,7: - i �a �''E9t :rd°i r "&� ae' ; sq�' �• x¢ rr :: i E tilt "t:�¢' � r,K ! i
i�'.li7 a ;� i ,`r�E i a t € � pp � 1 ks�` � '� i ' i i i 'w a t: q.7t3 ¢�i � kEa• �� r ©ads i ; • f:}
., �'� vr..�t4 L� .«az r,'.T dl r,, i, c ii � r 3 ial.> �. •,,, d>z �r# f d ,a� bd � ! ¢�§L a u, ji � t '�} '.$ C i f ¢ at �E� �� '!'; rj P I➢ 1 �
„aE i,.���. ,R �¢� o: P il�sr ��� �d3 t 'F' 1; r �iut jr. BI � •r §�E �; i�E ��} � R I; � t I � e� B' ,� k
sk•
"`..
a � a :<>l a]s.$ r# t �� a .►� (¢[ ''t paid E f;'��"+§�d3d° r�r$�i! B §§ C Pal°4� 1,1
got �gga E Y E r
it ��t4 Ea1f r„ssj} >*r k
G' ra,€ a$+ is 1.'. #t.g _.r fSi,y ! tt a1 •.I 'd e, 4 € , is I Ivy
k., t'�r iC' E `i7� •l : I�' b'�r ��ai �', 7`.
�&7 c i
a E
�t t ! dr, ADS; E is �li °a d a €.8; i• a E 4
liE�� ti �N� § € `( s�� t (t��, �f' �� € I i�� t < -1 •
NEW#4 x€ Yp, 1tt x 'E r r a Ei �" & r, s !• gg'� a 1
� i �..}-
i.i
3 - o •, f li r N k I ! Y!'�' A 13 �i� d"Elf � i E ?4 .# S i I) ''TEt
��lli �dllp!)�•P ��p1;it � a,� l�r� _^ w# b ;>} ' � i� E tt �� >�. � . J � � �, fly a ' ,
E �: ,, 4 bE �e r. E pan d t,. ���., [ i' �Xi, a•� #F Ba _ Pf E - „ YVY
.1Ptit€il� 'kdr `
� i7^ d��b rn `iRt'=q'iztr}a &s: `c•, �, ",', � to ;. � _.,f
r ' �' r �r ;a .e � s,, : a ¢t ? >>r tk -�;t ��,
��� �, r l �dCp. diB}�: • i,E �d!p d e !a!§i i - a '.kid �• t 9�'i r # � Fti. ,EB 7 iq� r r -.h < g � _ e I r i �- �.�i'ni k
IE 111
'� +' +. O 'O. •� f.:'?f'' "d4` d I J
ldtiF�ilrr �Y€
E_ ii
� } 1i' Fjs� k '.: .' � �.di § '•? r d7 tJf � i71= "p t � :�� e s t t t � ;�'�x f Mt€)a
°�£ gd€aSE;}{,t �3a� sj�• jE{p ti E?".... ,dE°°;l #d.'d'Pi'aNIPd-i$ �� 07,.�p�,i:l �r''
°f:,P� t tt �E§ 3 r 8$ E 'd t k :# —
d r ! '••h- s,. t{� e¢ n r l Ipp �. Ot 1°.. 06 tt ,d. a : E p E B¢t-ldrY'(i
6 't � - � � -' i i H qq�� _ �'•i' ��paBB, >� L to - r � + :� f ; I r+% I' r:, % d a �fi r�9�cp�j >E 'dra �E,t• �t � �a'i# a_ •
qi -.t�l �7 �.r 3 a? _,, r r
ytr a ri . � €a E E E Er,a- f(p EF' :i' l §y p z r €st`a n. n' k r • I E, ° ;{ t S t '`' M j i T'
Cf!I'(r t .# „n E §r s$ r , Ex ,.�§ = tPB di`
: ,'.€ . d : €4'i N � a�^=i -i'A O! - + "{a ,.:T. � 1 ^ d �''r: !., 1i. t?fr •" sr, it #r� } � r ,E,.1a�dt�l J x
�.�.:
01
1
6
..
.« f s ! mr :;a, � tia, r �'d -' �;�Vf �i,'tdP� Xi��i�l ,aldl'd�h ' �3p�a+ild¢€ �. �i �<.:[; rl �, �� !>Ir p{t.�a o, #• i : i -

f
Andrews Hunt Farms
RC Hunt [Owner]
2500 Nash St N. STE A
P.O. Box 7119
Wilson, NC 27895
Wilson County
Uttice -2753
Fax [phone]
May 14 1998 �{. � V.
NC Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Subject to Response to Notice of Violation
AHA Farms
Permit No. AWS350022
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Schuster,
.f.
AHA Farms has put a perfect 'plan together with only one exception, that ,our pasture ,
land, which was intended for bermuda is dominated by fescue. Being located on the
rolling hills of Franklin County, the last several years we have seen excessive rainfall
levels. This indirectly has resulted in a beautify lush, thick fescue pasture. On an initial
inspection in 1997 this difference was noted fescue vs. bermuda. However, as owner of
the Farm I elected to continue to keep fescue as my primary pasture crop, applying waste
by the agronomic rates for fescue. Prior to Mr. Towell Inspection we had several
meetings with SCS and had requested and amendment to our animal waste plan to reflect
fescue vs. bermuda issue.
My concerns is Mr. Towell, is that last year our farm recieved very high marks with a
notation of the fescue vs. Bermuda issue. I cannot believe this year it's a violation. His
inconsistency must be addressed immediately or he will not be an asset to the Farming
Community of Eastern North Carolina or his agency.
One final note in reference to Mr. Towell, as an individual working tax payer it is very
unprofessional to discuss adjoining neighbors business on my farm. I am not sure what
Mr. Towells objectives, but to discuss in front of me and my farm manager; our neighbors
potential -fines may be approachirig'$600,000 is harassing anal unprofessional behavior.
We'as hardworking people -do not need-that,I'nor does the Division�of Water Quality.
Action Plan:
Since, the inspection we have contacted Kim York SCS to amends our animal waste plan.
That contract was made immediately after the inspection. Our goal is to have updated
animal.waste plan in place by July 1, 1998, which will reflect our waste application
intentions.

Mr. Schuster
Page 2
Final Note, for the record I would like to comment that my farm manager Spencer Dean
has done and excellent job managing the animal waste, This incident should not be
reflected on him, but myself RC Hunt, the owner,
Respectfully Submitted,
RC Hunt
CC: Franklin County Health Department
Ms. Kim York, Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Dil
e��
[:)F-=HNI:;z
v
R.C. Hunt
Andrews -Hunt Farm
PO Box 7119 F
Wilson NC 27893 rT
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
I. V., i!1A1 : ';..,1) Andrews -Hunt. -Farm
Facility Number 35--22
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Hunt:
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed -with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdeslet 1
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, N�� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �� An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

,eft �1
��
1�
� y

Andrews Hunt Farms
RC Hunt
2500 West Nash Street STE A
P.O. Box 7119
Wilson, NC 27895-7119
Wilson County
Phone
Fax [phone]
March 28, 1997
To: Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor (DEHNR)
3800 Barrett Drive Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Facility #35-22
Andrews Hunt Farm- Franklin County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
In response to your letter dated 2-28-97 specific to Buster Towell Inspection. Mr. Towell
noted our active crops differed from our Waste Manangement Plan. Currently we have an
exellent stand of fescue, rye, orchard grass pastures. However, our concern started with the
multiple years it normally takes to establish Bermuda. Bermuda sometimes is a hit and miss
venture. To be safe we also seeded oats/fescue/rye,orchard grass to assure minimum errosion
and maximizing concern quickly. To date the fescue has dominated. We have requested an
amendment to our Waste Management Plan, which reflects our actual established crops.
Thank you for your kind attention in this matter.
Respectfully Submitted,
te c7vwt�
RCHunt
ApR
DWNR RA i=iGH REWi )VA!_ Off !CF

� ��- „�
,�::
���z r._

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh, Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
e��
[DaHNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 28, 1997
Mr. R.C. Hunt
P.O. Box 7119
Wilson, North Carolina 27893
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Facility # 35-22
Andrews -Hunt -Andrews Farm
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Hunt:
On February 17, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell .from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that the swine operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State, nor were any
manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited conveyances (for the
purpose of willfully discharging wastewater) observed. However,
the inspection indicated that the active crop in the land
application area differs from that designated in the Animal Waste
Management Plan (AWMP). This deviation ,from the approved AWMP
constituents a violation of your permit. You may wish.to contact
the local Soil and Water Conservation District concerning technical
assistance in preparing an addendum to your AWMP to accommodate the
current crop.
This matter should be immediately addressed to prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. Please respond to this Notice
within 30 days of receipt. You should include in your response the
actions that you will take to address this deficiency.
3800 Barrett Drive, Sulte 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Nif C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Volce 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

IN
R.C. Hunt
page 2
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an
important responsibility of all animal waste producers. The
Division of Water Quality has the responsibility to enforce water
quality regulations in order to protect the natural resources of
the State. Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to
surface waters of the State are subject to civil penalties of up to
$10,000 per day, per violation.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
Sincerely,
�'—
Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Franklin County Health Department
Ms. Kim York, Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District
Mr. Steve Bennett, Regional Coordinator, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
'RRO Files

n ❑ D WC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
WQ Animal feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Al Routine 0 Complaint 13 State employee call 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection U Follow-up of DSWC review
Date of inspection 1-
Facility Number
Time of inspection C= Use 24 6r. time .
Total Time..(in hours) Spent onReidew
Farm Status:or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: �1" CJ� S� ,��� A .. F-6 - _ ....._ County: J
Owner Name: ,.-� +�' .� �' { ��`.'.! �. Phone No:
:Mailing Address: 70, P f3 t>x -7/11 tV I s 0-,
wo-
Onsite representative: S �'�^^ �'�'"s"� Integrator: `' . ►�.�Cz-1 r
Certified Operator Name:( B✓_ p E'"i1 ..._...r .. _......_ ..� ..._ _......... _.-._ _ .. _ .._. _...__....
Location of Farm: -
Latitude •�•�u
Longitude • '
113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Swlae. C
"pr , Number Poultry ....: Number ".. attle Number
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to.Finish
Farrow to Wean
w to Feeder
a
Farrow to finish
[j Layer
Dairy
❑ Non er
❑ Beef
-La
❑ Other Type Livestock -
t
of
Number o'agooa Haldsag Ponds 0 Subsurface Drains Present
itFr�s- « u F 0 La ooa Area Spray Field Area
General ,_,_,
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? [IYes L�'N0
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes flNo
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes J nOo.
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? Of yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes M_N/o
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ,�, o
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes CI No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 01 Y
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. 1 facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1197)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lap-000s and/or Holding Ponds/
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): La oon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvcment?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Aeplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
IS. Crop typed@,1.
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. oes the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping nerd improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfiinspection with owner or operator in, charge?
❑ Yes Flo
❑ Yes .0
❑ Yes ro
❑ Yes No
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes id"No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
es ❑ No
❑ Yes 0'No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 42.0 .
❑ Yes N�o
❑ Yes ❑'No .
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
Commeats {refer to question #}: , Explain any YES answers and/or any Y recommendations or an other comments.
Use drawings offalcility to better explain situa_'tiions.'(use additional Pages is necessary)
e4
nS}C t.L+� t'Z44, Ij,% Pl^ Clr,'14 t—'V­ 6i;y eds'
uj-ea -�v t44-n j ty'd �`1 . N.,ye Cs+• fiti f % 14A,.,Q.�• �+ K+Q.r.-TI W R}n s ti a�-s d S a-�r
- tJ Gt.� / A r des ware n C r tS h i L✓ h[ Ply h /� 1 w+ �'1 -1 r o�.a
8
Reviewer/Inspector Name -
Reviwer/lospector Signature: ) `6 ._ Date:
rr•• lli,dvinw nr W .w. f}r.nlih� Wn.�� /T....linr Ci.•tinw Fn.•ility Assessment Unit E 1/14/96

pis ?�i;inyyl .rsrt � -
s; +�;�M:iAt±R-' Gtl�� � ��!�? �, �� %. �• �' .jam
co the �Jqw
bif
40C .r
E- ! w to 0 ara► ter sy4ir p BSc it4rtr " 4 : mpft4w om Al W"904M Or4v# ITMO
wordOft On VAmOO &KWT D64 Sh-mr. �AO;W� ,Zj AIW to,
,Fw"" AdW, is tdoMw tjqijid Lit`'}
i
(ovorop ice. so .F
ft;SAKW, shw me -dilirforft,
to w lop
SWV*y DJU ShW ft Oudge :.
to Or t xn ,ham P. you do not to delft v � `����ta1r�.
P' C Hurt
20
q
j.5
22

-Appendix I.Lagoon iluW99 Survey Form - -_ - -'-- - — I —_ - [_ - - _7_ Fui_
4 — ------
Farm Permit or DVVQ Identification Number Z -z-
B. Lagoon Identification—
t
C. Person(s) Taking Measurements
D. Date of Measurement 00/44
Me;;ds_emoos Used for JD. Measurement of:
AAY-1-8,721
a. Distance from the lagoon a top of the sludge layer
IPV< APE
Sludge Judge
b. Distance from the lagoon I iquid surface to the bottom (soil)lof the lagoon
Sludge _Judge / 10;V_Z Vj,0,- --NC'DENR-Rbl6iOtfR§'g-ldn—al-Offic-9
.Le. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "Core sampler",
Sludge Judge f 610;QC
.�=F Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top
(Draw a sheet, listdimensions, and caLlate surface area. The lagoon
404"Iftr*nt-tlhan de3ll' ;n*dj Is . a measurements should be made.)
G. Estimate number of sampling paints:
a. Less than 1!33 acres: Use 8 points
b. If more tha 1.33 ac. 71 acres xT=4/F with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform grid that has the same number of jntersedionsathe I ­
estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the intersection points a e goon grid so that data
recorded at each can 6e easi y matched.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Shoot' (Appendix 2). Also, at the
location of the pump In;;i;:rtiI-- measuremerhs of distana* from liquid surface to _tope sludge
layer and record It on the Data Shoot (lost iow); this must be at least 2.6 ft. when irrigating.
I. At the time of the survey, also measure the distance from Maximumthe Liquid =evefT�th'�'Pres.�;TTq-uici
Level re at the lagoon gauge pole):
J. Determine the distance from the top of bank to the Maximum Liquid Level
(use lagoonmanagement plan or other lagoon records)
K. Determine the distance from the Maximum,Uquid to the Minimum Llqui�l�a-
.-- --- -------
(use lag2!�LmLnagement an or oth on records)
4
Calculate the distance from :the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level
7
(item K Minus Item 1, assuming the
present liquid leVe"SOGI Maxim'
M 14uId Level)
M. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to ih`6-- TIL
lagoon bottom (average all the measurement points} A0. f.
N. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the top
of the sluddo layer (average for all the meisurement points):
Q. Record tram Sludge_
Data Sheet the average t Ickness of the sludge layer.
P Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item N min
Q. If Item 0 Is greater than Item P proceed to the Worksh6ot for Sludgy Volume and Treatment Volume.
If Item 0 is equal to or less Item P, you do not have to determine volumes.
-
Completed by: Al L-;UT'
Print Name /Signature
'Appendix 2. Sludge SurvoybataSheot. Revised August 2008
Lagoon Identification AI_

Completed by:J RC Hunt I � �C � Date: 6—_
�� Print Name
Signature
(A)
Grid Point
No.
(B)
Distance from liquid surface
to top of slud a
(C)
Distance from liquid surface Thickness of sludge layer
to lagoon bottom (soil)
Ft. & in.
Ft (tenths)
Ft. & in.
Ft. (tenths)
Ft. & in.
Ft. (tenths)
2
3
4
B�-
9
10
12
,a
15
,s
17
�e
19
20
21
22
23
24
1?. /
.9. L
g�
2,13
� �
q.a
�i. z—
a.�
!1l •,b
is-G �
�,�
/A
gyp, �
. - _�_ ,�_ .�.._. -.._
t,5
!'
.r-.-,t,-�+�-
1,7
1117
� 7
t, f
•--•--�. �
r
Points
e'
Average of
points
�A
g
!/D
x x
1. b
Al pump
intake
x x x X x x
'All Grid !'Dints and corresponding sludge
layer thicknesses must be shown on a sketch attached
to this
Sludge Survey Data Sheet.
Appendix 3. Worksheat for sludge volume and treatment, volume J
The average thickness of the sludge layer and the thickness of the existing liquid (sludge -free) treatment zone are determined
from the information on the Lagoon Sludge Survey Form (items O and P. respectively). In this example, the average sludge
layer thickness is 2.5 feet and'the existing liquid treatment zone is 3.5 feet. If the lagoon has a designed sludge storage volume,
see notes at end of the warksheet The dimensions of the lagoon as measured and the side slope are needed
for caWatians of sludge volume and of tote! treatment volume. If the lagoon is a standard geometric shape, the sludge _
volume and the treatment volume in the lagoon can be estimated by using standard equations. For approximate volumes
T
of rectangular lagoons with constant side slope, Calculate length and width at the midpoint of the layer, and multiply by layer
thickness to calculate layer volume, as shown in the example: Far irregular shapes, convert the tote! surface area to a square
or rectangular shape. For exact volumes for lagoons with cons ttanside slope, the "Prismoidal Equations" may be used.
Your
1. Average sludge layer Thickness mI�
2. Depth of the lagoon from top of bank to bottom soil surface (D) ft. ft.

aa3Q
E
r
r
:I
1�
\
w
w
rt--
NO
a
�
Q
Sa
h
a
rif
116(� �sg

WALLACE AND GRAHAM, P.A. •-
ATTORNEYS
52SjNOEtT}{ MALN STREET TELEPHONE: [phone]
Si\LlSgUlil NC 28144 FACSIMILE: 4704) 833-1)434:'
TOU, FREE: [phone]
NORTH CAROLINA
nment and Natural Resources
h Regional Office
DATE/TIME, 9 /301,/cl
REPRESENTING r/LJct (T c� t� rG l i � PA
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the -Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public
records in our custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the
responsibility to the public to safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program
obligations. Please read carefully the following before signing the form.
1. Due to the large public demand for file access, we request that you call at least a day in
advance to schedule an appointment for file review so you can be accommodated.
Appointments are scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m on Tuesday Wednesday and
Thursday. Viewing time ends at 4:45 p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view
the files to the extent that time and staff supervision are available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name or incident number1 as appropriate.
The number of files that you may review at one appointment will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if -time permits.
Cost per copy is 5 cents for ALL copies, front and back will be 10 cents per copy. Payment is
to be made by check, money order, or cash in the administrative offices.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU RECEIVED THEM. Files may not be taken
from the office. No briefcases, large totes, etc. are permitted in the file review area. To
remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor for
which you can be fined up to $500,00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $25.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
6. The customer must present a photo ID, sign -in, and receive a visitor sticker prior to reviewing
files.
FACILITY NAME
1. w5 Ho 12, -i
2.
3.
4.
5.
'WaUCL4C.a (;) tgk�� 11' ' -'?6) - i �_
Si9 nature and Na Firm/Business ` Date
Please attach a business card to this form if available
COUNTY
O
Time In'Time Out

r
North Carolina
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Andrews Hunt Farms LLC
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
PO Box 7038
Wilson, NC 27895
Dear Andrews Hunt Farms LLC:
NCDGNR
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
October 1, 2009
Dee Freeman
Secretary
"r
I• l OCT l 3 20fi9
0ENN IME]" l o,
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS350022
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Franklin County
In accordance with your requests for renewal and change of operation type, we are hereby forwarding to
you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Andrews Hunt Farms LLC, authorizing the operation of
the subject animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia), located in Franklin County, with a swine animal
capacity of no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 'Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: 1800 Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS350022 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in -this permit. Record keeping forms_ are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeper forms.
1636 Mall Service Center. Raleigh, No& Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2128 Capital Blvd.. Raie#, North Carolina 27604
None: 919-733-3221 1 FAX: [phone] Customer Sevice: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: WWWLncuvateMuaiiiy.org
Nne
orthCarohna
An Equal Gpoortunity t Affirmative Action Employer

N
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Raleigh, NC. National
Weather Service office at [phone]., or by visiting their website at: www,erh.noaa.aov
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection Staff may be reached at 9197914200. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
,for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Franklin County Health Department
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS350022)
AFO Notebooks
Murphy -Brown, LLC

6.6 Calibration Requirements
All waste application equipment. including irrigation systems. hose drag systems, honev wagons. and
solid spreaders must be field tested and calibrated to verify operating performance and application
amount. Field calibration to verify application amount is required once a year for NPDES permitted
and once every other year for state permitted operations.
Irrigation Systems - calibration involves field verification of 1) operating pressure. 2) wetted diameter,
3) flow rate, and 4) application uniformity.
The minimum calibration performance requirements for irrigation systems are:
1. Operating pressure at the sprinkler/gun must be verified using a properly functioning pressure
gauge and observed to be operating within the range recommended by the manufacturer or
specified in the irrigation design documentation for the equipment being calibrated.
2. Wetted diameter of the system being field calibrated must be measured as described in NCCES
Irrigated Acreage Determination publications AG-553-6 or AG- 553-7 and observed to be
within 15% of the wetted diameter reported in the manufacturer's chart for the operating
pressure observed in (1). AND
3. Flow rate must be determined to be within 10% of the value specified in the irrigation design
documentation or as was determined during the wettable/effective irrigated acre determination.
Flow rate shall be determined using EITHER -
a. Flow rate from manufacturer's chart for the measured pressure at the sprinkler/gun
(item 1) and measured sprinkler/gun orifice diameter, OR
b. Flow rate measured with an approved, calibrated flow meter.
4. Application uniformity is deemed to be acceptable when items 1 — 3 above are within the
ranzes specified.
Note: Flow rate to be reported in column 6 of IRR-2 (item 3 above) should not be calculated from
"catch can" measurements as described in NCCES field calibration publications AG-553-1, Ag-553-2
or AG- 553-3. The catch can method cannot be used to compute flow rate for IRR-2 because this
results in a `'double counting' of the evaporative PAN losses during the irrigation process.
Hose Drag Systems - should be field calibrated by measuring ground speed and effective applicator
width as outlined in NCCES publication AG-634, and flow rate using a flow meter as described in 3b
above. The application rate can be determined from tables presented in AG-634 and should be verified
against application rates specified in the WUP,
Solid Spreaders — should be field calibrated using the Weight -Area Method as described in NCCES
publication AG-553-4.
Honey Wagons — Liquid and semi -solid application equipment should be field calibrated using the
Load Area Method as described in NCCES publication AG-553-5.

A
WCDEHR
Nmh -C' zmhna.Depam,nt -o'Envtonmsnl emd "Natu ra'.1 Resources
.Bpeveql�-
Goverilul,
ME, MORANDUM
Daft: swtember-2s.-2009
and P-=Tah,%-d Aalimp I CY-p=,bow
From.. Ivem �C"2��ChRL-
Ul 7 C. QmmitMe
Der,-'� F re.6:nan
lie -mr - niTnzl 20NA 12171me, Enc) A
ate. znima]way Im4wivu SVSL'--= the
p -unffoxmi�� mwfbefliLd
opem- tingpressurc. wcAtod diainctcr- and f9up, me-,provi=, . stifficientievidence4far
con=llbi: Izdhnim'i addiiio=!, qu-=inwi
rcgarding tbus subiect,
Bazims"u,
-I, Evil" OWhqj I o',� � Mltfo-ilo� at, a t?wi
Cl;w
-NorthCarultriLl
7atulrallil

r i (
k�
Nov 17 2008
Animal Waste Management System Operator Designation Form _ -
WKSOCC
NCAC 15A 8F .0201
Arrr &rmS
Facility/Farm Name:
Permit #: A t, l u)bbo^^ Facility ID#: 35 - as County: FMV) VJI
Operator In Charge (OIC)
Name: b2 Cron l Hurrr
l ire! Middle Last
�� Jr, Sr, etc.
Cea Type / Number: / + T`7 Work Phone: (oZ5_' i
Signature: �G �"r Date:_ _ q' 3Q-oiQQ$
"I certify that I agree to my designation as the Operator in Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the rules
and reguialiulls p0llalning LU Ule IeSpWlalbli li lea sci ik;i ill In is A NCA(_ t)6 .V203 alld faiihig tU do so can result ill Disciplinary
Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Back-up Operator In Charge (Back-up OIC) (Oplional)
First Middle L.tlsr Jr, Sr, etc.
Cert Type / Number:
Signature:
Work Phone:
Date:
"I certify that I agree to my designation as Back-up Opermor in Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities set forth in 15A HCAC 08F .0203 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Owner/Permittee Name: -_ _ 2o�-T - 4urr --
Phone#: oi5 a35—$3g3 Fax#:(a6a).��—..`%%
(Owner of authorized agent)
Mail or fax to: WPCSOCC
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1618
Fax:[phone]
(Retain a copy of this form for your records)
Rev iwd 8/2W7
f f �', � 1 �a

Robert C. Hunt
PO Box 7038
Wilson NC-27895-7038
N.C. If"aterPolluth, IS rvZtnt Operators
~:
certl le , nrnricrinil
Robert C. Hunt
Tv- made ([rM r.2g c„� cert
_ t
A►►'A - 2.4249
fro duty ['erdfled Operator undnprueireom aj: lydclr3, ChapterAL-1 of
the Grneral.Srafum o%.1'orth Caratlna
Purr! E. Ra0v /� �j�
C:h rrirrrrrtrr 0j�

9119/2008
To: DWQ
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mal Center
#2aleigft, NC 27889`11i29
Attn: Jane Bernard q tck- rpt(-
From: Spencer Dean
1074 Edward Best Road
Louisburg. NC 27549
Subject Operator in dvugs of facility 3522.
Jane 1 am writing to have my name removed as operato in charge as we discussed an the phone lest week. My
c edWica0on number is AWA 19269. 1 wip have no further defftg wdh dw waste mknegement at Castak Forams.
Thank Yowl
Spencer Dean
if you have arty questions piesse call. (919A"70 office
(252)23a`OWS craft

FAX COVER SHEET
A A WA NORTH CAROLINA
*A DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NCDENP* Raleigh Regional Office
*O^"• 1 628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Li Pages, including cover sheet
TO: (.0 P 0..'S 0 r C FAX:
FROM: -Zcx T �14.�� .vLo� DATE:
SUBJECT:
MESSAGE:
If you do not receive a# pages, call 919. 791.42 or fax back to q l q - 7159 - 71579
THE FAX NUMBER REMAINS THE SAME

9/19/2008
To: DWO
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Attn: Jane Bernard
From: Spencer Dean
1074 Edward Best Road
Louisburg, NC 27549
Subject: Operator in charge of facility 3522.
Jane I am writing to have my name removed as operater in charge as we discussed on the phone last week. My
certification number is AWA 19269. 1 will have no further dealing with the waste management at Castalia Farms.
in addition I will have no participation in the waste management at Andrews Hunt other two hog farms; BNJ at
Black Creek and AHA at Macclesfield.
If you have any questions please call. [phone] office
[phone] cell
Thank You!
A"-� 9'.3
Spencer Dean
l4 OCT 2 0 20

FAX COVER SHEET
NORTH CAROLI NA
-rA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NCDENR Raleigh Regional Office
mom" Q11628 Mail Service Center
emvww�AmMmumfto
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
a Pages, including cover sheet
TO: % L9 - Q �' 1 _ FAX:
F
SUBJECT:
MESSAGE:
f
If you do not receive ag pages, call 919. 791. 4200 or fax back to q t q - TO - 7155
THE FAX NUMBER REMAINS THE SAME

Bernard, Jane
From: Bernard, Jane
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:31 AM
To: Zimmerman, Jay
Jay,
Just FYI
I met with R.C. Hunt yesterday. The visit was a follow up to his failure to maintain
freeboard that was self reported in February. As a result of the freeboard issue I reviewed
the past year of records and the findings are as follows.
Castalia Farm AWS350022- Active
1. Freeboard from 11/16/2009 was missing from records.
2. Failed to complete sludge survey in 2009 as required.
3. Failed to maintain freeboard levels above 19.
BNJ Farm AWS980009- Active
1. Applications using a waste analysis barely over 60 days. 5 applications totaling
120,600 gallons between 12-17-2009 and 12/24/2009.
2. Freeboard log has 17 entries over 7 days. Entry ranges from 8-19 days apart.
3. Fields F-13, F14 and F15 - no corresponding crop in current waste plan for
applications made in October 2009 and January 2010. Over seed was planted.
4. Failed to complete sludge survey in 2009 as required.
5. Failed to maintain freeboard levels above 19.
AHA Farm AWS980001- Was Bunting Population under 100 hogs
1. Failed to complete sludge survey in 2009 as required.
2. Freeboard log has 17 entries over 7 days. Entry range from 8-19 days apart.
3. Failed to maintain freeboard levels above 19.
Mr. Hunt was reminded during the 2009 inspection that surveys were due before the end of the
year.
Sludge surveys were completed in April, 2010.
Freeboard is reported weekly to the integrator although that information was not available
during both visits.
(note: new e-mail address - iane.bernard(@ncdenr.Qov )
Jane R. Bernard
Environmental Specialist
--------------------------------------
Aquifer Protection Section, DWQ
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

o� warF9
L7 �
o •c
R. C. Hunt
Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
PO Box 7038
Wilson, North Carolina, 27895
Dear Mr. Hunt:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
0
r. 9�0D8
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS350022
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Animal Waste Management System
Franklin County
May 23, 2008
In accordance with your application for a change in operation type from a 1800 head Farrow to Feeder
farm to a 2169 head Farrow to Wean farm received on May 12, 2008, we are hereby forwarding to you
this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC, authorizing the operation of the
subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with
General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC
Number AWS350022 dated October 1, 2004, which expires September 30, 2009. This change of
operation type does not result in an increase in the steady state live weight.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia), located in Franklin County, with an animal capacity
of no greater than an annual average of 2169 Farrow to Wean swine and the application to land as
specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to
Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are
unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced
by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than. the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www,ncwatcrQuality.org location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110°% Post Consumer Paper
o `
NhCarolina
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone; [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer service: [phone]

Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keepingkepping and monitoring conditions in thisermit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards,. and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Aquifer
Protection staff may be reached at (919) 7914200. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Franklin County Health Department
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS350022

3. 3 N V A
j
w
K
� Ir
D 1�

�7/ -, J
L9
4.p� 3�/ W, 5v
ly ros/S�/�
� le")?tl . � . � a y/� 62
L o - !�1--4

oumta
12otiWU Wei WA)W M* oMa P"L=
xo tNijod atp:awa w .r w i o" bNlcl ' O-K Aq pumtbol aq Amu uvtd r opwM a pqn tummm
s 'iwf; uF4: m4A 41 QuoZ auaoaao.,kL 1>qtkbi7 boo so to umvpM:M4=NoW an 1# Aoug ,
(opm) U l :s..dst s&lftW Up 30 i abnri"s OW IOM oM AaAM 4d%=W VW4 1ST
:(qu ad yu+menwo r u wp ffa sal obasart s) jaLat *61Rh ow po ft
oW as t"at Plbll mmid an wcq e=wW"wow qua go aftm =w Ps000v
itrttwtial ip"� :(Ra?od vmmnwmsvww &* m so; a6wos) u[aiioR uoof*t
Ali di tarot a5a} -f t:. nbq W"Wd OM tUCQ &MOW Ma ioo M SWO La, Sr4 *OVUM 00 UMV Paoo08
iatlauai) t' 1 j IOmn PMIM U=UtMW 09 uY Pwar[ aoUPPA PPft WOONd aW UMQ OMW'43
_ (s puaw uoobnt saylo jo and =i wjpuq&W
P*4nmwqum@qoo4p&Anpusbn wmn"i1t oW w*4 emmom wo sa ;wjowQ
(mown) wd ['p '(Glod *DUO MOOOM Wl 411 OZWMU) taA't ppibn tusmsd
aq1 of 1"WI pP ar, u PAII iKvW an U"sJ G*LNWllf aW Wnwomm "M'LOAM WSPOP am W WAM atti TV
gtir[c�! 8 ooa mo-wo cc't uo%o wxn 's
vulad bufidww;o Mqum •is
waoa 8•t __ _ ------ .(s ea is dW i is mowAowyp bqn)1q V
..-___. __�-_...�. �.�.�..._�.._.._.. six
ma :«sridsu*r aa'�« slW+ , 11Fi►�► �*snA+s�ot rBNt* �� 'o
pp waft- & I
_.. ..d*. ov W Ia*8) vns� :mo«a so •DOM pFaba !!abnt we � i� !!=* 't
. _.-..�W+oomp"r we as "MP� Sri
40 rmmoznnopl Yo; Pogo "Opec l•pawww
40ADOI*ema
l J40d Z aAMS SAMIS UQOBB'7
06-: +- <. ae (zcz)
7.ZE�L4 ' •N �:�7ulJ
P�'°dr �' "�, � Li•�6

?�4? ,.Inbe Road
clm crly, N(,- ZIOY-2
(2n2)-460- 6)
Sludge Survey Volume Workshect
Farm Name and DWQ Identification Number:
Lagoon Identification:
Meanurenksota Taken By:
Date of Sludge stwmy:
Average Mudge Iatyer Thickness
CeetsU f fans DWQO 3 "2
La_ on -: 1
Chad P'rtdgen
00/20/06
Depth of lagoon f m top of bank to bottom soil surface
Slope *: horlsontaV*ert[cal side slope
Lsn9* at top inside bank
Width at tog iroide bank
Length at midpoint o1 sludge layer
Width at midpoint of sludgs layer
Volume of sludge
volume in gallons
1.64 Ft (tenths)
1=.10 Ft (tenths)
3
901.00 Feet
303.00
Feet
_ 42=.t#S
Feet
is&"
Feet
101,033
FO
_,,,

p
�!
7447 Jobe k vAl
Sludge Survey Date .Sho-ef
farm Hine and DWO Iden0cation Number: Ca@WU Firms 1
vrow Identfficadlon. n # 1
Ve=:mro ltments Tak" Dr. Chad ftWr rn
D .to of Fbulge `kuvvr.. EV/20106
G dd Pok
r ,..
_
DiNum horn li-quid
snrh�c a to of
;'eezt tenth=
Distaw* &am bgwd oxtwe 7l�ic]rs+ers o� ahidgs
to n botkM �scrli
1 +'!enthm
Feet t ntla
1.3
a
10
9 _
8
7
9
�. ...,�
a
1 9
#
7.8
30
917
• g
10.2
a
9.6
1.9
11
7.7$.7
.� a
la
9 ,...
10
a
l8
T.B
9.9
2.1
_ . 14
3Q
1B
9.1
f Q
1.9
� �
7.7
9.5
.� .._
1.8
7.7
9.0
1.8
37
_
1.7
0.0
1.9 ..
1,?
18
7.7
9.4
19
20
! �
B
9.t3
I's
7.7
9.8
1.6
a1
JL Ta vi
... ...
9." Im +etffi�e n 1.� 1Pt

H
Ci. J� 9 •� L -!
M
"O
�� rw
• n' CA
3
I
�i*` �
•.ram ---
` P
Q
`'
i

Andrews Hunt Farms, L.L.C.
R.C. Hunt
IQ
P.O. Box 7038
Wilson, NC 27895
Office [phone]
Fax [phone]
April 5, 2007
To: NCDENR
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Re: Animal Facility Annual Certification Form
From: R.C. Hunt
AHA Farm #NCA 298001
Dear Buster Towell and J.R.,
1 apologize for not sending the annual certification form; I was under the impression the renewal
forms for transitioning from NPDES to state non -discharge permit that the annual certification
was not required anymore. Also, I realized that I checked the wrong box on the request for
certificate coverage, my NPDES permit expires July 2007. My intentions were to request the
state non -discharge permit not NPDES.
Respectfully Submitted,
R.C. Hunt

ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number Me- A �% %JVMI County
ev)lse ri
Year 200 k
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) �%,.i�LsC�vs �Yvr�•r,� s flff �i
Operator in Charge for this Facility /o- C .2141 ^17 . Certification # Z SZ V Y
Land,Application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
V YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste
was generated ut not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I : Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields q or Pulls 0 (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): Z$ Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
f 7-6 Z7 j►,j A141TC /0%a d
2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: 7 5", Total Acres on which waste was applied j d n� )
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
I gr ,y
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit: _ .2 3!i -ill a 6 _ T
3. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year �f1J tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
Ili 7 610
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest 2_ SC)
Smallest So
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers
8. Facility's Integrator if applicable:
Part H: Faclfi Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during E(Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03

e facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from & Yes ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3. There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
Ef Yes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
Ef Yes ❑ No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
MYes ❑ No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification.
Wes ❑ No
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
VYes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
VYes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
dyes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
[Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all
EtYes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as spec' ed on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
�/
O Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware 'that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and impTisonment for knowing violations."
F.
_S //V/V,'7-
Jame and Tit
Signature of Permittee
different from Permittee)
or print
AFACF 3-14-03 2
/--zz--J7
Date
z-1 e' . 7
Date

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
R.C. Hunt
Andrews -Hunt Farm (Castalia)
PO Box 7038
Wilson NC 27895
Dear R.C. Hunt:
IT 0
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DCPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
15 W •r
December 30, 1999
15
1
1AA1 I ? ---
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 35-22:4�
Fratklin C uo ty
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI , IRR2, DRY I, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR I , SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
00�
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609
91915714700
File Access Record
SECTION
TIMEIDATE
NAME
REPRESENTING:
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the; Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public records in our
custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the responsibility to the public to
safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program obligations. Please read carefully the following
-guidelines before signing the form:
1. We prefer that you call at least a day in advance to schedule an appointment to review the files.
Appointments will be scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 a.m. Viewing time ends at 5:00
p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view the files to the extent that time and
staff supervision is available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name. The number of files that you may
review at one time will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits. Cost
per copy is 10 cents for ALL copies if you make more than 25 copies - there is no charge for
less than 25 copies; payment may be made by check, money order, or cash at the reception
desk. You can also be invoiced.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU FOUND THEM. Files may not be taken from the
office. To remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor
for which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $20.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
FACILITY NAME COUNTY
c� �.(�.I�� � air w► ��..� k � i�
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sa C 1 �=j�=j t csb
SIgnatu& and me of Firm/Business Date Time In Time Out
Please amkh a Nolmw card to fhb loan

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 26, 1998
R.C. Hunt
Andrews -Hunt Farm (Castalia)
PO Box 7119
Wilson NC 27895
A Li MM
NCDENR
NORTH C:AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Reissuance of Certificate of Coverage
No.AWS350022
Andrews -Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and
Application System
Franklin County
Dear R.C. Hunt:
The Division of Water Quality modified the Swine Waste Operation General Permit originally issued to
this facility on August 4, 1997. In accordance with the issuance of the revised General Permit, we are
forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) to R.C. Hunt, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from the Andrews -Hunt Farm (Castalia), located in Franklin
County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 1800 Farrow to Feeder and the application to land as
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
COC No AWS350022 dated August 4, 1997. The COC shall hereby incorporate by reference any
specific conditions of the previous COC issued to this facility. The purpose of this COC is to allow
coverage under the revised General Permit. Please review the revised General Permit (enclosed) and pay
particular attention to Condition I1.10 regarding tree removal from lagoon embankments, Condition 111.1
regarding inspection frequency of the waste treatment, storage and collection system and Condition III.6
regarding notification requirements for system failures, spills and emergencies. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 2762E-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycledl,10%a post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS350022
Andrews -Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Page 2
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Katharine Keaton at [phone] ext. 533.
Sincerely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: . (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Franklin County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OP WATER QUALITY
May 12, 1998
R.C. Hunt
Andrews -Hunt Farm (Castalia)
PO Box 7119
Wilson NC 27895
SUBJECT: Designation of a Certified Operator in Charge
Andrews -Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Facility # 35-22
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Hunt:
North Carolina General Statute 90 A-47.2 requires the owner of each animal waste
management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid
animal waste management system, to designate a properly certified operator as the
Operator in Charge (OIC). Our records indicate that the OIC you previously
designated is no longer a certified animal waste management system operator.
As the owner of a registered animal operation with an animal waste management
system, you must designate a certified animal waste management system operator as
the Operator in Charge. Enclosed is an Operator in Charge Designation Form
specifically for your facility. Please return this completed form to this office by
June 12, 1998. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as
absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for
your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge.
If you have any questions regarding the certification of an operator, or need assistance
in locating a certified operator in your area, please contact
Cindy Dudley with the Technical Assistance and Certification Unit at
[phone] ext. 309.
cd/Desig. of certified OIC
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Sincerely,
6L� w. At
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance & Certification Unit
MAY I? IN3
' DEHNR RALUGH fifGiBAL OF W
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATORS CERTIFICATION COMMISSION
P.O.BOX 29935, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-093°.l
PHONE [phone] FA% 91 9-733-1336
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 5090' RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina "7
Department of Environment,LT15VA
Health and Natural Resources •
Division of Water Quality
61 James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary C) FE N
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 4, 1997
R. C. Hunt
Andrews -Hunt Farm,(Castalia)
PO Sox 7119
Wilson NC 27893
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS350022
Andrews -Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Swine,Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Franklin County
Dear R. C. Hunt:
In accordance with your application received on July 14, 1997, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) to Farm No. 35-22, authorizing the operation of an animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with the State's General Permit (attached). This
approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of
animal waste from the Andrews -Hunt Farm (Castalia), located in Franklin County, with an animal capacity
of no greater than 1800 Farrow to Feeder and the application to a minimum of 70 acres of land as specified
in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until December 31, 2001. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of
wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data
and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater
than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
In accordance with General Statue 143-215.1OC, Animal Waste Management Plans shall include
the following components: -
- A checklist of odor sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- A checklist of insect sources and best management practices to minimize these sources.
- Provisions set forth for acceptable methods of disposing of mortalities.
- Provisions regarding emergency action plans.
Your existing Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must include the above elements, by
December 31, 1998. Documentation of the certification must be available to inspectors onsite. Submittal
of the amended certification statement shall be required upon renewal of your permit coverage in 2001.
.Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Mike Lewandowski at [phone] ext. 362.
AUG 6199
iET RALEIGH .;;y, ,,;i
Sincerely,
fA
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Franklin County Health Department
Raleigh-Regional"Office,_W,ater_Quality_S- ction
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality C s
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, SecretaVr' UL 2 519971
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.,
REG
R. C. Hunt
Andrews Hunt Farms (Castalia)
PO Box 7119
Wilson, NC 27893
Dear R. C. Hunt:
ll� �EHNR
Subject: Application No. 35-22
Additional Information Request
Andrews Hunt Farms (Castalia)
Animal Waste Operation
Franklin County
The Permits and Engineering Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. The total lagoon
capacity on the General Permit Application Form was left blank. Please provide documentation describing
the lagoon system by August 22, 1997.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information.
All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address
below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before August 22, 1997, or the
Division.will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your
facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid
permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 362.
Sincerely,
/17- �
Michael T. Lewandowski
Environmental Engineer
State Engineering Review Group
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

"- State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr, R. C. Hunt
PO Box 7118
Wilson, NC 27893
IDEHNR
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
May 14, 1997
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summary and Corrective Action Recommendation for
Andrews -Hunt Farm(Castafia)
Facility No.35-22
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Hunt,
On May 9, an Operation Review was conducted of the Andrews -Hunt Farm, facility no. 35-22. This Review,
undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10D, was one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was not being discharged to the waters of the State, and
the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposessystems were properly maintained and operated
under the responsible charge of a certified operator. A copy of the completed review form is enclosed for your
information. The following observances, questions and management deficiencies were discovered and noted
for corrective action or response:
a
1. The crop type, Fescue, differed from the Bermuda stated in the plan. Mr. Spencer Dean, the farm
manager, had on site information relating to the development of a new waste utilization plan with
different cropping requirements. Please see to the continuation and timely development of this plan.
2. There was an insufficient amount of land cleared for cropping. Mr. Dean indicated that as soon as
the soil was sufficient) dry, an additional area of approximately 15 acres would be cleared and
planted in Bermuda. This needs to be accomplished quickly since the Bermuda is planted by May in
this area.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
/� oz?-A
Margaret O'Keefe
.Environmental Engineer I
cc: Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District
Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DSWC Regional Files
38M Barrett Drive, Suite 101, j
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N� C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
R.C. Hunt
Andrews -Hunt Farm
PO Box 7119
Wilson NC 27893
I ?WA
6 TL4
IDEHNR
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Andrews -Hunt Farm
Facility ID#: 35-22
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Hunt:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 91gn33-00
Sinc rel ,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, -w 4
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 N'*f An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10°/o post -consumer paper'

3- -2'1'
} State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
r
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Tr
dft
IDEHNR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 8, 1995
Mr. R. C. Hunt
AHA Farms
P.O. Box 7119
Wilson, North Carolina 2789,3
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Swine Operation
State Road 1619
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Hunt:
On July 25, 1995, Mr. Danny Smith from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Smith's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state. In
addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, or other- prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
were observed. As a result, your facility was found to be in
compliance during this visit.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality.
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

R. C. Hunt
AHA Farms
Compliance Evaluation inspection
Page 2
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Danny Smith at [phone].
Sincerely,
J y E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
/ds
H:lanimdn
cc: Franklin County Health Department
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
August 8, 1995
Mr-. R. C. Hunt
AHA.Farms
P.0 Box 7119
:Wilson, North Carolina 27893
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Swine Operation
State Road 1619
Franklin County
:.,.,-.-Dear. Mr. Hunt:
On July 25, 1995, Mr. Danny Smith from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject Animal
facility. "ti
This inspection is part of the Division's efforts
potential problems associated with liquid -waste disposes]
systems.,
Mr.... Smith's site visit determined. that.. wastewater f rom YPU3
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state--li
"c Addition, no manmade pipes, ditches, : or other prohi6ite
..conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging:-.wastewatei-��,'
were observed. As a result, your facility was found- to be,_i4
compliance duringthis visit.
Al
-, "'..
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are � a . i§ -rsponsibilit�, e.
of allanimal facilities. The Division of
-
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality.
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State -
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater,to surface waters of_ --
the State are subject,.to-:-the assessment.ofcivil penalties and may,.-
-Z
also 'result in the loss of deemed 'permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind.
you.
that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan. by December 1997. This plan must be4 Certified
designated technical specialist or a professional
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with 3-,Ybdk-"-
waste management plan you should contact your local �,.,�1,Soil iih*'dt!�Waiter"-:
Conservation District.
3800 Barrett Drive,

wI 4
ft
R. C. Hunt
AHA Farms
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Page 2
The. -Raleigh Regional office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please -call Danny Smith at [phone].
Sincerely,
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
/ds
H:\animdn
CC. Franklin County Health Department .
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

4-1995 15:26 FROM DE11 WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
RRO P.02i02
y
Site Requires Immediate Attentanr-
' Facility No._��
DIVISION OF ENViRONMENI'AL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 5 199S
5
Time:
Farn Name/C?wner '!f /t l�l�?CYIi S / �• ��vf%
- - - I ;> , y[ (
Mailing Address:
County: u-
Integrator: o e:All 2I 1
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical AddresslLocadon:,,Q, &0" r� _ f� :::t.`? C_
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: _ _AACC2'Z2Number of Animals on Site.
DENT Certification Number: ACE- DEM Cemlcation Number: ACNEW
Yl.a
Latitude: �" 17 5 Longitude: Elevation. meet
Sl Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have-cient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
Gror'No (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Actual Freeboard:�Ec. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)?or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or `C�J
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or, o Is the cov r a uat ?Yes or 0 ,
�� w�,�r
Crop(s) being utilized: S fib(/ `"
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria". 200 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? e 'or No
se animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Lime Stream? Yes ore
animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Fee of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or CO
animal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-made ditch,.flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or If. Yes. Please Explain.
ria .,cs the facility waintain adequate wastt managenxent .records (volumes of ntanure,-land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes 019 -
Signature
cc. Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

17J
Andrews Hunt Farms
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
PO Box 908
Bailey NC 27807
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS350022
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Franklin County
Dear Andrews Hunt Farms:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on April 11, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Andrews
Hunt Farms, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG 100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS350022 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia), located in Franklin County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than an annual average of 1800 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land
as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to
Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are
unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced
by gilts at a rate of 4 gifts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the.conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal OpportunitylAfFrmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
;Vatu'rlailff

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC,.or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG 100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Franklin County Health Department
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS350022
APS Central Files
0

a1
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Andrews Hunt Farms
RC. Hunt
P.O. Box 7038
Wilson, NC 27895
252-291-2753
04-08-2003
This plan has been developed by:
CHARLES BASS
Franklin Co. Soil and Water
101-B S. Bickett Blvd.
Louisburg, NC 27549
919-496-3137x3
G
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
i (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. i have read and understand the
. Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
G- A4e.,A Y
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature Date
---- -------------------------------------------------------
269502 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-08-2003 Cover Page l

0
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S 11
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid waste generated 6,949,800 gals/year
by a 1,800 animal Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid operation. This
production facility has waste storage capacities of approximatelyapproxiniately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
10731
Incorporated
18429
Injected
20296
Irrigated
11664
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year l
16,529
10,142,444
-3,192,644
. _ Note: 'Li source ID, 5 nneans standard source. U means user defined source.
269502 Database Version 2,0 Date Printed: 04-08-2003 Source Page 1 of 1

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure c
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the rnantr*e generated by the operation
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if ani nu I waste is being
utilized Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied Soil tests should be used
to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of
animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
1
Nrtrogm
Comm
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
S(
PA
Fat.
(Iba/A)
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Ma
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
AvI
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Fi
source
Total
Use.
RYE
Applic
Applies
I
1000
Trad
Field
LD.
Sail Series
Acre
Acres
crop
RYE
Unit
Period
N
N
N
Method
Ibs/A
aaYA
tms
1000 gals
to
--178
1A
Sll
Wedowee
10.4
10.4
CereaVAnnualRye d/S,
2.0
Tana
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
100
64.76
0
673.54
Ha -4n Hawed
-178
lA
Sit
Wedowee
10.4
10.4
Surnbtmm-SudanHay
4.3
Tana
4/1A/15
212
0
0
Broad
2121
137.30
0
1,427.90
189
1
Sit
Wedowee
7.3
T3
Cereal/AnnualRyeO/S,
2.0
Tens
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
]sift
100
59.58
0
434.95
Ha -4n Harwell
189
1
si 1 I
Wedowee
7.3
7.3
Srrgbum-Sudan Hay
4.3
Tens
4/1-9/15
212
0
0
lrrix
2l2
126.32
0
922.10
189
lB
Sl 1
Wedowee
2.2
2.2
C.YAnnual Rye O/S,
2.0
Tens
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad
100
64.76
0
142.49
Hay-417 Harved
189
tB
Sl I
Wedowee
2.2
2.2
Sarghum-Sudan Hay
4.3
Tens
4/1A/15
212
0
0
Broad
212
137.30
0
302.06
189
2
SII
Wedowee
24.4
24.4
Careal/Am al RyeO/S,
2.0
Tens
10/1-3131
100
0
0
]trig
100
59.58
0
1,453.81
Hay-4/7 Harwed
1Tons
189
2
si 1
Wedowee
24.4
24.4
Sorghimm-Sudan Hay
4.3
411-9115
212
0
0
prig
212
126.32
r__0
3.082.08
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/8/03 WUT Page 1

Trail
Field
Source
LD.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
use.
Aces
crop
RYE
RYE
I Unit.
Applic.
Period
Ndrogm
PA
Nutrient
Raga
Cam.
Felt
Nutrient
Applied
Rea
(lba/A)
Applia,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(sere)
Solid
Masora
Applied
(ace)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Fidel)
Se
Ma
Apl
(Fi
N
N
N
IWA
1000
A
tons
1000 Odsto
189
23
Sl1
Wedowee
5.6
5.6
Cereal/AtmualRye O/S,
Ha -V7 Harvest
2.0
Taos
10/1-3/31
100
0
0
Broad.
100
64.76
0
362.68
189
2B
Sl l
Wedowee
5.6
5.6
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
4.3
Tons
4/1-9/15
212
0
0
Broad.
212
137.30
0
768.87
189
3
Sll
Wedowee
1.3
1.3
Fescue Hay
2.7
Tons
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
Irrip,
120
71.50
0
92.95
189
313
811
Wedowee
1.5
1.5
Fescue Hay
2.7
Tans
8/I-7/31
120
0
0
Broad
120
77.72
0
116.57
189
4
S11
Wed.
1.7
1.7
Fescue Hay
2.7
Taos
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
goad
120
77.72
0
132.12
189
5
SI1
Wedowee
0.5
0.5
Fescue Hay
2.7
Tans
911-7/31
120
0
0
Grin.
120
71.50
0
35.75
189
5B
Sl I
Wedowee
1.2
1.2
Fescue Hay
2.7
Tans
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
Broad
120
77.72
0
93.26
189
68t7
SlI
Wedowee
1.4
1.4
Fescue Hay
2.7
Tons
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
trig.
120
71.50
0
100.10
189
66t78
Sll
Wedowee
0.4
0.4
Fescue Hay
2.7
Tons
8/1-7/31
120
0
0
Broad
120
77.72
0
31.09
i
Total Produced, 1000 gallcm
6.949.80
Manure Solids
Idal Applied tm,
Balance, tons
Notes: 1. In the tact cohmm, symbol -- means leased. atheswise, owned 2. Symbol' means user cotaed data.
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/8/03 WUT Page 2
r 0

711e Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that maybe applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any me application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tray
Field
Sail Series
Applicdian Rate
Oaches&ow)
Applicatia4 Amo=
(inch®)
199
1
Wedowee
0.45
1.00
189
2
Wedowee
0.45
1.00
189
3
Wedowee
0.45
1.00
189
3B
Wedowee
0.45
1.00
189
4
Wedowee
0.45
1.00
189
5
Wedowee
0.45
1.00
189
5B
Wedowee
OA5
1.00
189
16&7
Wedowee
1 0.45
1.00
189
6&7B
Wedowee
1 0.45
1.00
0
------------------------------------------------- - -
• 269502 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-08-2003 1AF Page 1 of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. 'These estimates are based on average nitrogen
Oconcetmations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most eases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting.
Since nutrient Ievds are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefillly applied.
Sites must first be evalilated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not
be used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields
with high amounts ofcopper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vuTnerableto
surface water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous
levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Sludge - Standard
0 bu
150
13.16
64.28
128.56
192.93
m R.Y.E.
L-y
300
26.32
32.14
64.28
96.42
40 bu
160
14.04
60.26
120.52
180.78
- - -- -- ---------------------------- - - - - -- - -- - -- -
069502 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-08-2003 Sludge Page 1 of 1

'Me Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
. capacity available at the end of each month of the pl an. Available storage opacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days ofnet storage volume accumulated. The
start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first
crap in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
0
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. Ifthe available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application ofnutri.ents that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage opacity is negative, the estimated volume of accuumulated waste exceeds the
design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application
interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structtue's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name I Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon U uid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date 811
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
l
1
73
1
2
98
1
3
120
1
4
129
1
5
168
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
160
1
12
137
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
. -
269502 Database Version 2.0Date Printed: 04-08-2003 Capacity Page. 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drib,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing hinLlher the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass
Miter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS
Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disldng after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
• ' Y 4 N 269502 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed 04-08-2003 Specification Page 1of 4

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
• will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
• loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
-------------------------------------------------------------
269502 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed 04-08-2003 Specification Page 2 of 4

14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
• public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
• accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or, discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A
regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
--------------------------------------------------------------
. 269502 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed 04-08-2003 Specif cation Page 3 of 4

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
. elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions
require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a
minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
C�
--------------------------------------------------------------
. 269502 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-08-2003 Specification Page 4 of 4

, r
•
•
Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, 313, 4, 5, 5B, 6&7, 6&7B
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation. Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to
avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture
with clovers. Soil test for preplazrt and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations.
Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers
but use proper legume inoculation tecbmques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay
production; reduce N rates by 25% to 501/o for grazing, Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept.
30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist
or extension, agent for assistance.
269502 T Database Version 2.0 - Date Printed: 04-08-2003 Crop Note Page 1 of 2

q.1
'N ;t
t

3 S - oZZ CAsMU-12� rar-M
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
04-08-2003
This plan has been prepared for:
Andrews -Hunt Farms
R.C. Hum
P.O. Box 7038
Ifilson, NC 27895
252-291-2753
This plan has been developed by:
CHARLES BASS
Franklin Co. Soil and Water
101-B S. Bickett Blvd.
Louisburg, AIC 27549
9199--%496�-3137x3 ,
CJ%��rC.(!feJ
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
i (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. i have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature (owner)
Date
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist. Signature Date
------------------------------------------------------------
269502 Database Version 2.0 Date 'Printed: 04-08-2003 Cover Page l
I

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
C m-frnercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
Sl l
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Liquid waste generated 6,949,800 gals/year
by a 1,800 animal Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon LicLtid operation. This
production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
10731
Incorporated
18429
injected
20296
Irrigated
11664
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume SutplusfDeficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
16,529
10,142,444
,-3,192,;
----------------- ---- --------__ e,1-fi------ _------- - - - - --
Note: 1n source ID, S means st.tttdard souuce. U tnetstas user dtted source.
269502 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-08-2003 Source Page 1 of 1
Z z
a � �
A.f4e

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of a cres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing ofapplicatims to maximize nutrient uptake,
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure c
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the t¢il ization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient contrast of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if amnia I waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each applicatipn cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied Soil tests should be used
to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of
animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
II
t
Nmwm
Carte.
Res
Mwpre
Liquid
S&d
Uquid
Sr
PA
Fen.
(lbs/A)
PA
14l=ure
Mmure
Manure
Ma
Natrtem
Ntmient
Ntnnml
Applied
Applied
Applied
Am
Req'd
Applied
Applied
(=e)
(aae)
(Field)
(Fi
Sauroe
Tmw
Use.
RYE
Appiie.
Applies
1000
Trod
Field
LD.
Sail Series
Acre
I Aaer
Crop
RYE
I Libit
Period
N
N
N
Method
'WA
A
ims
I OW mAsito
A
1
Wedowee
10 4
10.4
Cereal/A=W Rye ON.
2.0
T.
10V1-3/31
100
0
0
ft d
100
64.76
0
673.34
�
! A
J aI
Hay-4/7 Hmvw
T 71178
W1A'
OVSI
Wedowee
10.4
10.4
Sarum -%,Um Hay
43
Tests
4/1-9115
212
0
0
13rwd
212
137,30
0
1.427.90
189
1
SIP
Wedowee
7,3
7.3
Cava]/AnnualRyeo/S,
2.0
Tests
1011-3131
100
0
0
Irriw
100
59.59
0
434.95
Ha -4n 1iaresl
189
1
SIP
Wedowee
7 3
7-3
Sar&.-SStdao Hy
4.3
Tau
411-9115
212
0
0
l i ,
2121
126,32
0
g22.10
189
E B
SIP
Wedowee
2.2
2.2
Caeal/Annual Rye 0/S,
2.0
Tma
10/1-3/a I
100
0
0
]road
100
64.76
0
147.49
Ha n Hw-na
189
1 B
SI I
I Wedowee
1 2-21
2.21
Scrgb—_%dm Hay
4.3
Tons
411-9115
212
0
0
Bread
212
137.30
0
302.06
t89
2
511
WedoweeIff2_49T
1
Gaeal/AtmualRyeON.
2,0
Tests
1011-3131
too
0
0
&tiS
100
59.58
0
1,453.6E
Hs -4n Harvest
in
2
SI1
Wedowee
244
24.4
StrSh=-%don Hay
4.3
Tau
4!1-0115
212
0
0
lrr
212
126,32
0
3.082.08
Preview Database Version 2.0 _ - Date Printed: 4/8/03 - - WUI' Pane t

Trad
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Saies
Trial
Acre
Lisa
Acres
crm
RYE
RYE
Unit
Apphc.
Period
Nitrom
PA
Nutri
Req'd
Comm
Fat
NuUum
Applied
Res
(lbs/A)
Apphr-
I Mdhod
Mee
PA
Nwnart
Applied
liquid
Manure
Applied
{tee)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
mature
Applied
(Field)
Sc
Ms
Apt
{Fi
N
1 N
N
lbs/A
1000
W&A I
ups
1000 vAlm
to
189
213
sit
Wedowee
5.6
5.6
Cerew.,kimual Rye01S,
Hareem
2.0
Tans
10/1-3I31
100
0
0
Broad
100
64.76
0
362,68
199
2B
Sit
WedmAm
5.6
5.6
Sorghum-sudavHay
43
Two
4/1-9A5
112
0
0
Brand
212
137.30
0
768.87
199
3
Sit
Wedowee
1.3
1-3
Femme Hay
2.7
Tons
9/1.7/31
120
0
0
IrriA,
120
71.50
0
92.95
199
38
Sl l
Wedowee
1.5
1.5
1 Fescue Hay
2.7
Tan
WI-7/37
120
0
0
Broad
120
77.72
0
116,57
199
4
Sit
Wedowee
1.7
1.7
IF.. Hy
2.7
T.
911-7/31
120
0
0
Broad
120
77.72
0
132.12
189
5
S11
Wedowee
0,31
0.5
F.H
2.7
Tans
811-7131
120
0
0
brig,
120
71.50
0
35.75
189
53
Sll
Wedowee
1.2
1.2
F.Hny
2.7
Tons
811-7)31
120
0
0
Broad
1 1201
77.72
0
93.26
199
6dt7
Sl l I
Wedowee
1.4
1.4
Pe gam jHJ y
2.7
Tom
911.713 3
120
0
0
brig
120
71.50
0
100,10
189
6&7B
Sit
Wedowee
0,4
0.4
F.Hay
2.7
Tans 1
8/1-7131 1
120
0
0
road
120
77.72 1
0
31.09
Total e
Mimure Solids
Total Amlie& term
Balacce tms
Notes: 1. In the tr"cet=u6 cymbal - means leased. dherwise• owned. 2. Symlwl • numm user anwel data,
-Preview - - Database Version 2.4 - Date Printed: 418103 - -. - - - - - - - - - - Wlff Page 2-

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table
ILIA [ration rage varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system. you must
apply at a rate that will not result in rlmoff.- This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that maybe applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also fists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrittation Avoliaation Factors
Trod
Field
Sail Scrim
Application Rate
(4d- lboar)
ApplicmLim Amomrt
(iubal)
199
1
Wedowee
0.45
1.00
189
2
Wedowee
0.45
1.00
189
3
Wedowee
0.a5
1.00
189
13B
Wedowee
0.45
1.00
189
4
Wedowee
0.45
1.00
189
5
Wedowee
0.45
1.00
189
5B
Wedowee
0.45
1,00
189
6&7
Wedowee
0.45
1.00
1"
6dt7B
Wedowee
0.45
Tool
I
rrM
-------------------------.--_--____---------_-..___ _w_ _---__-- _--
269502 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-08-2003 IAF Page I of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge Ntrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second oolurm.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agrcnornic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting.
Since nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefillly applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not
be used for sludge application. if this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields
with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to
surface water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous
levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
AA-Af Rate
lblae
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gavac
Minimtun Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
iS Years Acctuu "son
Swine Farrow -Feeder Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Cam 120 bu
150
13.16
64.28
128.56
192.83
Huy 6 tm R.Y.E.
300
26.32
32.14
64.28
96.42
soybrm 40 bu
160
14,p4
1 50.25
120.52
180.7s
---------------------------------------------------------------------
269502 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed 04-08-2003 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as Me
design storage capacity in days minus the ntunber of days of net storage volume accumulated. The
start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first
crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero_
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greaten than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application ofnut dents that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the
design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application
interval in the waste utilization plan is in oonsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Availohip Wact,- Ctn"aa I annAti,
Source Name
TSZne FmTo uFeeder La&= iqwd
Design Storage Capacity a s
Start Date
8/1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available StorAge Capacity (Days)
1
1
73
1
2
98
1
3
120
1
4
129
1
5
168
1
6
I80
1
7
190
1
8
180
1
9
180
i
10
I$0
i
11
160
1
12
137
'. Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
- - - 269502 Database Version 2.0T _ - - - Y-
Date Printed: 04-08-2003 Capacity Page Iof I_ _ _ r

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass
Eder strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS
Field Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
-269502 _ Database- _ ~ _ ' - _ -
Version 2,0 Date Printed: 04-08-2003 Specification Page1 of 4

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 199.5 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
-------------------------------------------------------------
2G9502 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-08-2003 Specification Page 2 of 4
..
�t`X' s'

14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the Gelds have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on an
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A
regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
--269502 Dai_ -
abase Version 2.0 Date Printed 04-08-2003 Specification Page 3 of 4

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions
require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for a
minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
269502 _ T -�- - -
Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-0&-2003 Specification Page4 of4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3, 3B, 4, 5, 5B, 6&7, 6&7B
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20, For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lWac., for drilled. use 15 to 20 Iblac. seed. Use certified seed to
avoid introducing weeds or annual ryeprass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture
N&Kth clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance time, phosphorus, and potassium reomnmendations.
Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers
but itse proper legume inoculation[ techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure-standfescue for hay
production; reduce N rates by 25% to 501/o for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept.
30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Tecbnical Bulletin[ 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages m North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist
or extension agent for assistance.
-------------------------------------------------------_---
259502 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 04-08-2003 Crop Note Page l of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1 A, 1 B, 2, 28
Cereal/Annual Rye Overseeded —Hay
CEREAL RYE
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth. The
most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye irzto short (less than 3 inches tall) bermudagrass sod.
if drilling is not possible, the seeds may be broadcast on short Bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation
rnith a disc or tillage implement_ The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the
rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the bermuda prior to August
31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of Plant Available N (PAN) may be applied between September l 5 and
October 30. An additional 50 lbs.acre of PAN may be applied in February -March. 1f rye growth is
harvested on time and does not significantly shade the bermuria, PAN rates for the subsequent bermudaa
crop are based on realistic yields of ber nuda. A harvest is required prior to heading or April 7, which ever
comes first. This is necessary to minimize the potential for shading bermudi and reducing its yields.
ANNUAL RYEGRASS
Annual ryegmss should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winter growth.
The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling ryegrass into short (less than 3 inches tall)
bermudagrass sod. If drilling is not possible, the Needs may be broadcast on short bermuda sod followed
by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate for broadcast planting of seeds
should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The last application of animal waste is to be applied to the
Bermuda prior to August 31. An application of 50 lbs/acre of PAN may be applied between September 15
and October 30. An additional 50 lbs. acre of PAN may be applied in February -Marcia. If additional PAN
i s applied. to the ryegrass in April -May, the PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a corresponding
amount. This is necessary because ryegrass growth during April -Kay will reduce bermuda yields and
shorten the time bermuda can fully utilize the N. A harvest is required by heading or April 7, which ever
comes first to prevent shading of emerging berme& during April -May period. To favor the production of
the bermuda, additional harvests of ryegrass will be required when the ryegrass canopy teaches 12 to 15
inches heir.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1 A, 1 B, 2, 2B
Sorghum -Sudan: No Commait
-_-____--------------------------------------------—--------
269502 Database Version 2,0 Oatc Printed: 04-08-2003 CropNote Page 2 of 2

MAR-14-2012 10:48 FROM:BRILEY FOODS LLC
��LIN , rrytrd
252 235 2278 TO:19195714T18 P,1f22
rvT-
Andrews �urv-r �trrv�s_ LLC
3-I�l -I2
Jaffe,
EnCAMQCi o.�-E, 4�)Q 010-aoI i -Qj,
Cjsb-la arm. also S haue- each lnclivtduQl
-E'er if-lvoice, from �', love (Yl( U ( rn• SaL&v
�,Icfkd cL wn4en s�a4 eMen+ -Fs-om
owner Clare� M, l I � r� C�x�firm � nS-the, mu I+,PIe
decwenes t�deed -fo-+he OttA i�rm (Acabon
a..f5o hctu2 q, C's�.Il In'FD �reS�a�2 'fin
T,rci ci'orTra ler o �' P,9sI-
rnCL-�ao1o0
`76mCn -Sv, Tk.sc help.

MAR-14-2012 10:49 FROM:BAILSY FOODS LLC 252 235 2270 TO:19195714719 P.2/22
Glover Milling Co., Inc,
3038 West Hornes Church Road
Bailey, North Carolina 27B07
252-237-0926
www.glevermilling.com
MARCH 14, 2012
TO WHOM 1T MAY CONCERN:
REF: BAILEY FOODSIANDREW HUNTS FARMS
ANIMAL FLED P UR CffA SE S TA TEMENT
MAY], 2010 - NOVl:MBER 30, 2010
The animal feed purchased for the above
Andrew Hunts Farms Shallingtons M}11'!
the AHA Farm.
J'amQA M
company was delivered to the
This farm wasireferrcd to as

MAR-14-2012 10:52 FROM:BPILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 Box 7038
WILSON NC 27895
TO:19195714718 P.5%22
***** STATEMtNT *****
DATE 12/31/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 5
CUSTOMER # G02021
BALANCE DUE: 53,905.66
------------------------------ DISCOUNT ------------------------•------------
REF DATE DUE DESCRIPTION IF PAID BY CASH CHARGE PAID DISC BALANCE
06/01/10
11DO SAL
1221G5
05/4G/20
06/05/10
SAG1CORN 300R
42.01
122100
06/1.3/10
09/12/20
12TONi:HOCr32D
3116.49
122253
06/12/10
06/17/10
14 TONC HOC FEWD
3614.30
122343
OG/27/10
06/26/10
14 TONG pQQ PDRO
3603.79
122420
06/97/10
07/07/10
14 TONG 1109 FRED
3952.99
123441
06/10/10
07/10/10
14 TONE 14k HOMIM
3540.73
122493
06/17/10
07117/10
14TON9140FOGFRED
3610.22
12350a
06/17/10
07/17/10
6AOCORN 2000
20,00
122124
06/l0/40
97/10/10
12 TONG HOG F==n
3109.44
123544
06/34/10
07/24/10
14 TON9 HOC fE1:0
3611,30
122570
06/25/10
07/25/10
BARN 200M
26.00
122509
05/25/10
07/25/10
14 TONG ROG rCED
2992,06
000179
09/20/10
04/20/10
12 k VCR YRA11
110.24
122427
07/02/10
011/01/10
12T0N6H00PC%0
2094.47
122627
07/02/10
00/m /10
DACCORN 30ON
42.00
122674
07/09/10
60/09/10
13'MH$ N{)OPPoD
3129.51
122713
07/16/10
00/16/10
14 TONIr ROC FEED
3936.12
IR27S1
07/11/10
09/14/10
14 TOW 10 H0Cr09p
3972.21
121253
07/19/10
paymme Applied CN1(M1m7
121294
09/19/10
Payment Applied CIIR015173
131305
07/19/10
PAymOnt Applied ClIK415337
121330
07/10/10
payment Applied C1110f10117
1.23331
07/19/10
Payment Applied CHK1f15337
12i421
07/11/10
payment Applied C34x01n117
123421
07/19/10
Payment Applied C11KO25317
12260G
07/19/10
Peymerit Appl�wA CRX015337
6568.04
6610.04
5725.�3
13339.03
17h2t.62
201576.61
24117 34
T1727.56
a7744.44
30acd.0a
7a47R.7a
14fiO6.74
96199.40
36369,134
41464.11
i11506.11
4dQ5 62
4A471.74
52344.65
42-09
57302.6A
140,;id
52154.41
56.00
L2090.41
927.e7
51170,54
269.44
50902.10
42.00
50060,10
14.00
50846.10
23,00
$0018. 10
BEG BALANCE 6,568.04
THANKS FOR YOUR BUSINESS! Plus CHARGES 124,054.41
PH 252-237-0926 www,glovermilling.com IeSS PAYMENTS 76,716.79
--------------
BALANCE DUE 53,905.66
PREPAID CURRENT 30-59 DAYS 60-89 DAYS 90+ DAYS
.00 .00 .00 .00 53,905.66

MRR-14-2012 10:53 FROM:BRILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
TO:19195714716 F'.6'22
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & SWine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BAILEY FOODS
P O BOX 7038
WXLSON NC 27895
***** STATEMENT *****
DATE 12/31/1.0
PAGE NUMBER 2 OF 5
CUSTOMER # G02021
BALANCE DUE: 53,905.66
------------------------------- DISCOUNT -------------------------------------
REF DATE DUE DESCRIPTION IF PAID BY CASH CHARGE PAID DISC BALANCE
eczozzzaze�zeeeaze.-..a a�ca�r�v �saczzzzzzzzzzzezzee e,-��O�aet �e���1��m0s�s7 +�ac�..--.aaa�a�pG7
121736
07/19/10
Payment Applied CHKO15337
23 Do
50790130
121774
07/19/10
payment Applleu CHK03.5337
162.24
50627.66
122787
07/2J/10
08/21/10
12 TONS 14%
3160.94
53799.90
122600
07/23/10
08/22/10
12TONS 14% HOC F951)
3168.04
55963,94
122021
07/24/10
08/28/10
12 TONS 14% KOO FEEL'
3129.51
60093,45
122047
07/30/10
08/29/10
12 TONS 141 HOO C6HU
3203,00
6329f­53
222954
07/30/lD
O8/29/10
SAOCORN 200R
28.00
63324.a3
060190
07/31/10
07/11/10
12 t PER YEAR
364.83
63689.36
122479
09/04/1.0
09/07/1n
12 TONR HOGS YF"len
3203.08
66892.44
121774
08/03/10
payment Applied CF4Kp16070
143199
66700.55
121n62
0010f./10
pAymerih App1.tell CHK11ian7n
3C5.59
66444.96
121955
00/05/10
payment Applied CHKp1G070
1284.63
6S160.13
121970
0p/11$/10
payment Applied CHKN16D70
14.00
65146.13
122091
08/OS/10
Payment: Applied rl4K#i 070
42.00
65104,13
122113
08/05/10
Payment Applied CHKp16070
3062.94
62041.19
17?ihw
0e/6-1/10
PnyM9nr, Applied CH M 6070
42.00
61999.1D
132102
Do/oi/10
Payment Applied CHKOL4070
3135 0
58883,70
i 7•iio7
noinglln
n,ks r npp14•ti mv.n rngn
1fl4Y 14
9RP47 44
122911
06104/10
09/OS/10
12 'SONS HOC irm)
3203.04
60095,53
122919
RP/12/10
a9/11/10
14 TONS 14t
1?2G, A7
64016.39
122970
09/12/10
09/11/10
UaCOU 200R
20.00
64044.39
12290
00/15/10
09/18/10
12 TONG 10HOOFEED
3360.74
67405,13
123001
08/19/10
09/18/10
12 TON 14t 1400 keglw
3360.74
70765.87
12.1027
09/20/10
09/19/10
14 TONG WOO P>tE0
2970.86
74666.73
000170
08/23/10
Pay%ont Applied CHK#16142 -
170.24
74116.41
1232"
02/22/10
payment Applied M1116142
1621.04
12693.45
322342
00/23/10
payment Applied CHKp16142
3603.7p
69209.66
ssataaa;saaaeaaesaaoaaaaaaar�ear�aaartan�emaa:amaesaaaaaaaeaeersaaaaaaaaa=aa-- :�.-_�===_===
THANKS FOR YOUR BUSINESS?
PH 252-237-0926 Www.glovermilling.com
BEG BALANCE
plus CHARGES
lese PAYMENTS
BALANCE DUE
6,568.04
124,054.41
76,716.79
--------------
53,905.66
rscarscnaanasyim.:�a����paQaas;, gaaoaoaamRonaoaaeaaaaaoaaoaaaaraaoaaaoF:aa+aa----Occ=��=�aaeassa
PREPAID CURRENT 30-59 DAYS 60-89 DAYS 90+ DAYS
.00 .00 .00 .00 $3,905.66
j°

MAR•-14-2012 10:54 FROM:BAILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
CLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & SWirle-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
TO:19195714718 P,7/22
***** STATEMENT *****
DATE 12/31/10
PAGE NUMBER 3 OF 5
CUSTOMER # 002021
BALANCE DUE: 53,905.66
------------------------------- DISCOUNT ---•--- ----------------------------
REF' DATE DUE DESCRIPTION IF PAID BY CASH CHARGE PAID DISC BALANCE
a Of aaaaammoommmm almmmamsaw amw=w„^7.==w====Tr 7,-���C�:. wa em mm as caeamaemsc M=.2=
122420
00/23/10
Payment Applied CMK#16142
3552.99
6665G.67
122447
05/23/10
Payment Applieu C'HKOIG142
969.54
64606.73
12,DKA
0A/21/10
a9/Q6/10
1R Tf1N0 1s;H i;rTer?
3360 74
68047.47
123094
08/27J10
09/29/10
1s TONA 1a>YHr,(. PTF.7
3920.Al
11M,34
12AO04
06/27/20
O9/26/10
DAGCWRN 2000
29.00
71996.34
133120
DR/'41/10
09/10/10
14 TONS P'ERO
4000.97
76077.31
12322P
DP/31/10
00/30/10
12 % PCA YGAF1
433.25
16510.59
122447
09/03/10
Payment Applied CHK#19#06
2570.79
7i919 71
122493
09/O3/10
Payment Applied CHK1116196
3610,22
10329.55
122508
09/03/10
PAymeat Applied CH016196
2Y.00
70301-55
122626
00/03/10
Payment Applied CHK016196
3109.40
67193.07
122544
09/03/10
Payment Applied CmM.6196
692.11
66510,56
123146
00/03/10
10/03/10
12 TONS 144 KOO P22D
2496.02
1600*1.38
123173
09/03/10
10/03/10
BACCORN 3001f
42.00
70049.19
123196
09/09/10
10/09/10
RAGMRH 2001E
24.00
70Cc3.30
133222
00/10/10
10/10/10
14 Ton 1411Mowcn
4000.97
14144.30
000190
00/19/10
Payment Applied CRK1f1G347
364.83
73179151
122544
D9/16/10
fty"nt Applied CHKMiG247
2931,79
10947.13
122670
09/15/10
Payment Applietl CHKR16$47
20-00
10919.72
122990
OD/16/10
P&y01ent Applied CMK#JJ247
)693.06
67126,67
122627
04/lf/10
Payment Applied CURW247
2902.32
64144.35
123267'09/16/10
10/16/10
12T6Nd14►1jWF%TPp
303.46
61717,81
123206
04/11/10
10/17/10
14TONS 1100FEED
4223.97
72001.70
123322
09/$4/30
10/24/10
14 TONS 11OGPCCD
42D0.0.1
7G250.43
1.22627
02/20/10
Phymans Applied CHK41.9342
112.15
76144.24
122637
00/28/10
Payment Appliad CHK#16342
42.00
I6104.20
122C74
09/20/10
Payment Applied CHKH16349
3139.51
72914,77
Lla aoassaaelC :ti r:�saaaaaaaoaraaaoe r. :---'-�'•.�----_��__^_�_�__^.==ITT=�==T==F=�-=c�CCC7=
BEG BALANCE 6,568.04
T] NKS FOR YOUR BUSINESSI plus CHARGES 124,054.41
FW, 252-237-0926 WWW.glovermilling.com less PAYMENTS 76,716.79
--------------
BALANCE DUE 53,905.66
==---.=�_==3oesaes::aa=aegis=c�=saisassaaaaaeaesaae:eeeseaeeQeaoaaae�esausaa>r�ae=�a�s:�-aaas=asses
PREPAID CURRENT 30-59 DAYS 60-89 DAYS 90+ DAYS
.00 ,00 .00 .00 53,905.66

MAR-14-2012 10:55 FROM:BRILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
TO:19195714718 P-8/22
GLOVER MSILLING CO INC-Mill, & SWine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BAILEY FOODS
P O Box 7038
WILSON NC 27895
***** STATEMENT *****
DATE 12/31/10
PAGE NUMBER 4 OF 5
CUSTOMER # G02021
BALANCE DUE: 53,905.66
------------------------------- DISCOUNT -------------------------------------
REF DATE DUE DESCRIPTION IF PAID BY CASH CHARGE PAID DISC BALANCE
122113
09/2e/10
Oayment Applied C14KNIG343
122751
09/20/10
Payelent Applied CHKJ116342
123301
09/20/10
30/29/10
12 TON9 HOC ?:Ciro
2619.45
000102
09/30/10
09/30/10
12 F PM YZAR
460.77
122701
10/07/10
PayM*nt Applied CHKN1043
122707
10/07/10
Paymelle Applied Cu¢N16343
122005
10/07/10
Payment Applied CHKM16343
122027
3.0/07/10
Payment Applied CHK016343
122947
10/07/%0
CeymeAt Apyligd CHW O 43
1325S4
30/07/10
Payment Applied CHK016343
132879
10/07/10
Payment Applied cnx4ie)43
1234515
1,0/07/1,0
3-1/06/10
12 TONS 144HDOF6YD
3Ge9.52
122402
10/00/10
11/01/1C
8AOC103w 2064
20.00
122879
20/15/10
Payment Applied CHKN16470
122911
10/15/10
Payment Applied CHI[N1C470
122939
10/15/10
Payment Applied CIIK}14470
122067
10/10/10
Payment Applied CHKO16470
322970
10/15/10
Payment Applied C'NKp16470
12152G
10/19/10
11/14/19
6 TONS 24% HOCK FEED
1D33.30
1.13505
10/22/20
11/21/10
nAOCORN 100k
14.00
123504
10/22/10
11/21/16
TOW 144HOOCGED
302.00
123631
10/20/10
11/27/10
TON lot IM PRSU
307.55
123634
10/29/10
11/20/10
SAOCORN 2008
42.00
000106
10/31/10
10/31/10
12 4 PGR v AR
444.40
1213704
11/03/10
13/05/10
TON 14e rlo(; 069k)
324.11
1137RR
11/05/10
32/06/10
BACCORN 3000
43.50
12304:1
11/22/10
12/22/10
DAOCORN 100k
29.00
THANKS FOR YOUR BUSINESS!
PH 252-237-0926 www.glovermilling.com
3e36 12
G9130.G5
7AAO.22
66250.43
G9677.08
70330.65
992.G9
65145.96
1169.04
66177.92
1260.04
63009.88
3120,91
59W .37
3203.08
66677.29
20.00
56649 29
1310.01
9G139.65
59028,17
S9036.11
1992.44
57163.93
3203.00
53960.65
3920.07
50039.10
955.GS
400H4.17
20.00
44056.17
E0900.52
51002.62
51305 .40
51612.95
51654.9$
5:099.40
L2420,S1
524G7.01
59496.01
AEG BALANCE
pIus CHARGES
less PAYMENTS
BALANCE DUE
6,568.04
124,054.41
76,716.79
--------------
53,905.66
esoaaoaaarscnsapaeages:;aa:.acx9=as=acaaaamoaaeaaaaaoacasxaaaaaaa »erica=.v=ee=ar�:aa=as"aa�.ur�
PREPAID CURRENT 30-59 DAYS 60-89 DAYS 90+ DAYS
.00 .00 .00 .00 53,905.66

MAR-14-2012 10:56 FROM:BAILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
70:19195714718 P.9/22
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swirls-6/1/04
3039 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
***** STATEMENT *****
DATE 12/31/10
PAGE NUMBER 5 OF 5
CUSTOMER # G02021
BALANCE DUE: 53,905.66
------------------------------- DISCOUNT -------------------------------------
REF DATE DUE DESCRIPTION IF PAID BY
CASI4 CHARGE
PAID DISC BALANCE
__._-_-------=-vs.rxvxvxxxxxx-=aaaoo�ox-T=xx=xxs=======xx=�sllpfeSnCypQelGsvxaysz-x=flaaas
1: 3a76 11/24/10 12/24/10 10o0iimmF.12q
150.90
52646.99
121911 11/26/10 12/26/10 BACCORN 3008
43.50
52690.49
000299 31/30/30 11/30/7.0 12 t PER YEAR
507,61
53198.10
173176 22/03/10 01/07/11 BAGCORN 3000
43.50
53241.60
124191 12/23/10 01/22/11 10000900PIN
167.91
53492.51
1244;6 k7l29/10 03120/11 100" 11000HOOPIN
33.00
53042.51
124191 12/30/10 Credit Meow App CHKNU00316
50.37 53392.14
124262 32/30/10 01/29/11 HOG PIN CREDITIJ 6AG:f
50.37-
63341,77
124202 12/30/30 Credit Memo Apt) C}1K0V00316
50.37 53392.14
000126 12/31/10 12/31/19 12 t PER Y&AR
513.52
33909.66
BEG BALANCE 6,568.04
THANKS FOR YOUR BUSINESS! plu6 CHARGES 124,034.41
PH 252-237-0926 www.glovearmilling.com less PAYMENTS 76,716.79
--------------
BALANCE DUE 53,905.66
=�uae�aaeeaeaesoeeQonrW��== �IIao�oaQaaaooaoaaaoaaaaoaaacaaaaaoa�aoQa=ooa=a.-.^.�:�_�__
PREPAID CURRENT 30-59 DAYS 60-89 DAYS 90+ DAYS
.00 .00 .00 .00 53,905,66

MAR-14-2012 10:56 FROM:BAILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2276
TO:19195714718 P.10'22
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mi..11. & Swine.-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/217-0926
BILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 122188
INVOICE DATE 05/13/10
DATE SHIPPED 05/13/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
----------------------------------------------------
CUSTOMER
P.O. NUMBER
---------------------------
INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
'PERMS
G02021
NET 30
QUANTITY
ITEM 0
DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
c 3aaaaaaasaacnaaaaaaaaaaaeasacaasaam¢¢=xs�xss�e�aaaaa
�r�ssaaca=aii :��� := �==Cl L'�G=��C��
19,620.0000
POM
CORK
CORN
4,4000
t1, 541.57
19,520.0000
POUND
GRIND
GRIND
.0100
$19G.20
31840.0000
POUND
BSANMPA4
DRANNUL 44%
.2300
5006.40
552.0000
POUND
GROW -PIN
GROW -FIN 60-37(/61)
.6000
$331,20
24,012.0000
POUND
Mix
MIX 6 BAOCIN(.;
.0100
S240.12
aQaxaeryrsesaesaraesae�arrns�aesaeae,�,max��aoramcaaomoeoaoaee�aevaaeaaaaaamam�r�r���^F====-==aa�aa,:
GLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESSI!!! INVOICE AMOUNT $3,115,49
pluo SALES TAX $.00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,115.49
less PREPAYMENTS $.00
lezz PAYMENTS $3,115,49
leas DISCOUNT $.00
LESS DISCOUNT OF $.00-----------
IF PAID BY $,00 DUE BY 06/12/10 $.00

MAR-14-2012 10:57 FROM:BAILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
TO:19195714718 P,11122
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P O BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 122253
INVOICE DATE 05/18/1.0
DATE SHIPPED 05/18/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CUSTOMER
P.O. NUMBER
INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERMS
G02021
NET 30
a a�aoaaa�apiaaCaaa�i+>aCriO�...�,<C
�f9 C7�tlI+tiG�G�iS IO>✓�RPai'+QaaQaaQacasO
lS C C74RaQamQQamsa�-====�a9a
QUANTITY
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
REF 0 PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
a a�aaoaaaaasaa�amaaaamaomoaoa000ma�tl
al3CCaOR�i73
�i.7. Li Pranna�a vsa LiGQRC��7eQama��C=== �-=
22,A40.ow
➢OI7ND
CORN
CCJRN
4.3500
$1,778 06
22,990.0000
POUND
GRIND
GRIND
.0100
$220.90
4,IRn.n6n'1
ONINn
APANAKAz.
KRANWRAL 4Ak
.2100
9940.00
644.0000
POUND
GRGw-RIN
DRDw-PIN 46-17i45161
_6000
$386.40
SIA,014.nnn0
MUM
M1%
MIX R RACCC7140
.O1o0
0200.14
a Ll ra es s7assasesa�spaQxq r.: »CC=:'�=G==03S=74S .�i� ����GG:G:v�Ct4£d c3GaGCGC1Ca L"^J�O"1�G�i'=.:-T=====__
GLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS1111 INVOICE AMOUNT $3,614.30
plus SALES TAX $-00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,614.30
less PREPAYMENTS $.00
leSS PAYMENT$ $3,614.30
less DISCOUNT $.00
LESS DISCOUNT OF $.00------------
IF PAID BY $.00 DLTE BY 06/17/10 $-00

MAR-14-2012 10:58 FROM:BAILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
TO:19195714718 F.12/22
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 122342
INVOICE DATE 05/27/10
DATES SHIPPED 05/27/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7039
WILSON NC 27895
- -
CUSTOMER P.O. NUMBER INVOICE CODES INVOICE TERMS
G02021 NET 30
QUANTITY ITEM # DESCRIPTION REF # PRICE PREPAID TOTAL
mramaaasmnesatamaotfr�eaaaaam�amcssmvaoaamcacvn====G==-==____===��saaoaaaa==a=a..�.zraaaa
221890.0000
POUND
CORN
CORN
4.5200
$1,841.55
22,B90.0000
POUND
GRIND
GRIND
.0100
$228.90
4,490,0000
POUND
REANMEAL
REANMLAL 48k
.2100
a940.(s0
644.0000
POUND
(¢ROW -FIN
GROW -FIN 46-:0(46N)
.4000
35$G.40
28,014.0000
POUND
MIX
MIX & BAGOiNU
.0100
$200.14
a oanaaaaaaaaaaaacaceaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaooeescauamsrcnca�c==�=a�W.,.=aea.�e�aa�-aaa
GLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESSII:! INVOICE AMOUNT $3,583.79
plus SALES TAX $.Do
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,683.79
less PREPAYMENTS $-00
less PAYMENTS $3,683.79
less DISCOUNT $.00
LESS DISCOUNT OF $.00------------
IF PAID BY $.00 DUE BY 06/26/10 $.00

MAR-14-2012 10:59 FROM:BPILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2279
TG:1919571a718 P.13/22
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/I/04
3030 W HORNE$ CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P O BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 122420
INVOICE ]SATE 06/07/10
DATE SHIPPED 06/07/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27695
CUSTOMER
--
P.O. NUMBER +-
-}INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERMS
G02021
NET 30
omaaavaaaacaaaaa:yaaaaaaacaaaaaaa�aaot"taacamaaoC
Gil Qiq��"-3aGtNacmcavcaaaacaaaceaasaBCG¢=
QUANTITY
ITEM #
DESCRIPTXON
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
m=+G :.w==mmaa== umocc=,­4c
=Q====G=
an===aaa as
22,990.0000
FOUND
CORN
CORN
4.2000
$1,716.76
23,00.0000
POUND
CRIND
aRINz)
.0100
522e.96
4,400.000o
FOUND
DVA0CAL
MANKEAL 46%
.7I00
$940.00
446.0600
POUND
OAOW-PIN
CROW -FIN 46-:0(440)
.goon
$386.40
2A,oi4 nano
PbtwD
NTX
MTX 6 PA?."-0TNr:
.0100
1200.14
oaaanssaaaoa>agersaaaoaaanbaG�rasmsxa��mam>maGaaoaaaoaooaaoaoaaaaaa>wa���«r :=.aaaaaaaa�a�
GLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESSI!!! INVOICE AMOUNT $3,552.99
plus SALES TAX $.00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,552.99
less PREPAYMENTS $.00
less PAYMENTS $3,552.99
less DISCOUNT $.00
LESS DISCOUNT OF $.00 ------------
IF PAID BY $.00 DUE BY 07/07/10 $.00

MAR-14-2012 11:00 FROM:BRILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
TO:19195714"718 P.14f22
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 122447
INVOICE DATE 06/10/10
DATE SHIPPED 06/10/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 SOX 7036
WILSON NC 27895
CUSTOMER
-
P.O. NUMBER
INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERMS
G02021
NET 30
vaobL4 C4ba000Odf{!lf �sfffffffffffff
Offffff Q7v07C�CQ=�=�=C=QQefbaef��a-a-ao==�aQCCr.[�5•^..s
QUANTITY
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
¢DG4CCCeT.laR�7m#Pwfff�f^fafffafffafmfmff�rcn=C=G���e===a=9maCo�J1C=_=====�==a=-���=
22,890.0000
POUND
CORN
CORN
4,1700
91,704.99
22,090.0000
POUND
GRIND
GRIND
.0100
$228,90
4.460.0000
POUND
BRANMEAL
BF,ANMEAI, 40%
.2100
$9" Ao
444,0000
POUND
GROW -FIN
GROW -PIN 46-]7(460
.6000
096.40
26,014.0000
POUND
MIx
MIX 6 hA(AINU
,0100
$780.14
GLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!!!! INVOICE AMOUNT $3,540.73
plus SALES TAX $.00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,540.73
lees PREPAYMENTS $.00
less PAYMENTS $3,540.73
less DISCOUNT $,00
LESS DISCOUNT OF $,Op --_-----_---
IF PAID BY $.00 DUE BY 07/10/10 $.00

MAR-14-2012 11:01 FROM:9AILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
TO:19195714718 P,15/22
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
$ILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7035
WILSON NC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 122492
INVOICE DATE 06/17/10
DATE SHIPPED 06/17/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF I
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX ?038
WILSON NC 27895
- - - - - - - -
CUSTOMER
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
P.O. NUMBER
- - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
INVOICE CODES
- - - - - - - - - - - -
INVOICE
- - - - - - -
TERMS
G02021
NET 30
ocaaaaaaaaaaaoaao=aaaaa=aa.^.aaa�a��=awoam==m=v�acac�A;p�pvevnesacna�oc.aavmm=====__
QUANTITY
ITEM ##
DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
22,290.9060
OCUND
CORN
00"
1.3600
$1,773.9B
22,090.0000
90=
GRIND
(:RIND
.n500
S22$,90
4,400.0000
POUND
BRANMEAL
SHANMEAL 49%
.7100
M 0.69
644.0000
DOUND
OR4v-rm
eRev.R;N 4z.ji(4cr
.4000
$386.40
�Ip,0I4.0000
POUND
MIX
MIX c DAWING
0100
$20C.14
GLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU 7OR YOUR BUSINESSIIlI INVOICE AMOUNT $3,610.22
plus SALES TAX $.00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,61.0.22
less PREPAYMENTS $.00
less PAYMENTS $3,610,22
leas DISCOUNT $.00
LESS DISCOUNT OF $.00------------
IF PAID BY $100 DUE BY 07/17/10 $.00

MAR-14-2012 11:01 FROM:BAILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
TO:19195714718 P.16{22
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/1./04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 122526
INVOICE DATE 06/18/10
BATE SHIPPED 06/18/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
CUSTOMER
T
P.O. NUMBER - -
INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERMS
G02021
NET 30
a a a a a a a v w a v e! p p
QUANTITY
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL.
19,620.0000
POUND
CORN
CORN
4.3800
91,534.56
19,620.0000
MUND
GRIND
GRIND
.0100
0196.20
3.840,0000
FOUND
HANMP,711+
n'+LANM= at
.2100
5006.40
552.0000
POUND
CROW -Fitt
CROW -MIN 46-37(460)
6000
5371.20
24.012.0000
POUND
MIX
MIX 6 DAMINO
.0100
$240.12
�caoaoaaaaflaaaacaaassaaaaaoaaoaaaauacaaaoeaao�aGs.wc�clwlwwawwawar.�e�w�ve�n�6�a�s�sa��
GLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU FOR YOUR HUSINES9111! INVOICE AMOUNT $3,108.48
plus SALES TAX $.00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,108,48
less PREPAYMENTS $.00
less PAYMENTS $3,108.46
less DISCOUNT $.00
LESS DISCOUNT OF $.00------------
IF PAID BY $100 DUE BY 07/18/10 $.00

MAR-14-2012 11:02 FROM:BAILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
TO:19195714718 P.17/22
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BILL TO
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 122544
INVOICE DATE 06/24/10
DATE SHIPPED 06/24/I0
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF I
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WI'LSON NC 27895
CUSTOMER
a
~-
P.O. NUMBER
INVOICE CODES
-
INVOICE
TERMS
002021
NET 30
aaaaaaw aaaaaaaaaoaaaaa:aaamaaaaas4nasaoaacoaca�WW��x==xxxx=xxmna��a===a==ccpG:4
QUANTITY
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
a4C7C C7�AC1�4C1■[I�mf�aa�1�111 wtm gpvmsa�n�Q401oa��ai���samQaCCQO�wR�='-`=====x===saaa+gx�a====W
22,890.0000
PORNO
CORN
CORN
4.3500
22A00.0000
POUND
GRIND
GAMD
0100
0220.90
4,480,0000
POUND
BEANMEAL
UZANNEAL 481
.2100
$940.00
644.0000
POUND
GROW•FIN
GROW -FIN 46-37(460)
4000
$386.40
20,024.0000
POUND
MI%
MIk 6 BACorm
0100
$2b0.14
naaaaaaaaaacaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaioaasaaa�sapaaaaaaaavcacccccccsaeaaaraa
GLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!!!! INVOICE AMOUNT $3,614.30
plus SALE$ TAX $ . 00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,614.30
less PREPAYMENTS $.00
lase PAYMENTS $3,614.30
less DISCOUNT $.00
LESS DISCOUNT OF $.00
IF PAID BY $.00 DUE BY 07/24/10 $.00

MAR-14-2012 11:03 FROM:BRILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
TO:19195714718 P.19/22
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 122589
INVOICE DATE 06/25/10
DATE SHIPPED 06/25/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
- - - - - - - -
CUSTOMER
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - .. - - - - - -
P.O. NUMBER
- - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - r - -
INVOICE CODES
- - - - - „ - - - - - -
INVOICE
- - - - - - -
TERMS
002021
NET 30
QUANTITY
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
a r�ar�,aaeeaaenenacaaeaaae,�eevaa�a�aa�ra:����.«�a�.amaae�-a••-••,�_es-••.•.��oaese.rasz=-=ca=
22,690.9000
POUND
CORN
CORN
41,2000
91,726.75
22,890.0000
POUND
GRIND
GRIND
.0100
P228.90
4,480,0000
POUND
RVANMNA[.
KANMM 484
J10D
3140.90
644.0000
POUND
GRON-PIN
f3RON-FIN 46-37(46N)
600D
1306.40
26,014,0000
POUND
MIX
MIX a BAROINci
,0150
$420,21
GLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS:I:J INVOICE AMOUNT $3,693.06
plus SALES TAX $.00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,693.06
lose PREPAYMENTS $40
less PAYMENTS $3,693.06
lees DISCOUNT $.00
LESS DISCOUNT OF $.00------------
IF PAID BY $,00 DUE BY 07/25/10 $.00

MAR-14-2012 11:04 FROM;BAILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2279
TO i 191957147 18 P.19/22
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BILL TO;
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 122627
INVOICE DATE 07/02/10
DATE SHIPPED 07/02/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
AAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
---------------------
CUSTOMER
---------------------------•------------------------------
P.O. NUMBER.
INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERMS
G02021
NET 30
am�ssYcaaaoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaxxaaaaaaaxcssss�a===aaa=enr_s==c=.a___=====css===yam:
a�==s
QUANTITY
ITEM #
DESCRIPTYON
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
==—=aear�aaaaaars�rdaarsaaaaaaaaaaaaaa�taaaa¢ape=
:===canaaaaaaaxsaas.�= « :=___=====seaama
19,620.0000
POUND
OORN
CORN
6.3400
$1,520.55
19,620.0000
POUND
GRIND
GRIND
.0100
,156,20
5,840.0000
POUND
BEANNEAL
BRANMEAL d6t
2100
1806.40
552.0000
POLWO
GROW -PIN
G110W-YIN 46•31(46k)
.6000
5331.20
24,012.0000
POUND
MIX
MIX L WOING
10100
G240.bq
GLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU FOR YOUR SUSINESS1111 INVOICE AMOUNT $3,094.47
plus SALES TAX $.00
INVOICE TOTAL $3,094.47
less PREPAYMENTS $100
less PAYMENTS $3, 094 .47 .
less DISCOUNT $.00
LESS DISCOUNT OF $,00------------
IF PAID BY $,00 DUE BY 08/01/10 $.00

MAR-14-2012 11:05 FROM:BAILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
TO:19195714718 P,20z22
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27907
252/237-0926
BILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 122674
INVOICE DATE 07/09/10
DATE 9FTPP77} 07/09/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
CUSTOMER
w P.O. NUMBER !T-
--INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERMS
G02021
NET 30
d�e4a aisaaaaaaaaaaasxmaa-as�xim==�s=araOmitCiCOaaOaaaaaaa�ac�C��a�����aac
:.:�«.:� ===
QUANTITY
ITEM it
DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
�asscsc=sa=s==as�aWacm�xcaaa�c..:�a���narsaaaacaacaa
aix�a=cmaaxe csraaaaaas=====_=_ ==_=
19,620.0000
POUND
CORN
CORN
4.4400
11,555.59
19,620.0000
POUND
GRIND
GRIND
.0100
$196.20
3,940,aa00
POUND
HLANMRAL
HLVM%AL 48f
12100
9006.40
552.0000
POUND
GROW -FIN
GROW -FIN 46-17i4601
.60DO
$131.20
24,012.0000
POUND
NI%
MIX 6 SAGGING
.0100
9240.1.2
Qa«agscaaaaaavaaaaaaeaeveaae�saaesaav�s�+esQaass�essaQa�aaQ=mca=ae==«««--«--_--«ccaca.eo
GLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESSfilf INVOICE AMOUNT $3,129.51
plus SALES TAX $.00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,129.51
lees PREPAYMENTS $.00
less PAYMENTS $3,129.51
less DISCOUNT $-00
LESS DISCOUNT OF $.00------------
IF PAID BY $.00 DUE BY 08/08/10 $.00

MAR-14-2012 11:05 FROM:BRILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
TO:1919571a718 P,21'22
INVOICE NUM28R 122713
INVOICE DATE 07/16/10
DATE SHIPPED 07/16/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 or 1
SAID TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 1038
WILSON NC 27895
CUSTOMER
P.O.-NUMBER•- ^�
-w INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERMS
G02021
NET 30
avaaeeaaeseasaaea¢sa¢aasaaamaaasxx�samasa
GtCQQQQQaQCSQ 4i5 Cl7=e.: +•-.---------=�-------=-e=ee-=
QUANTITY
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
1!'3 �aCaaaaaCCCaaaaaaaIIat[�¢�=¢�aaas==s=���ab�tsQ
QCSQ QQQQOQQxiee: e��edQeQQQQQs��e•�•`+eee
2210�D.0000
POUND
CORN
'IOU
43500
$1,B59.B1
22,090.0000
POUND
GRIND
GRIND
.0100
$228.90
4,480.0000
ROUND
B&ANNPAL
i38ANHP.AL 48%
.2100
CD40.80
644.0000
Potwu
ORON-rIN
(mW-iIN 46-F7f4601
.9000
" 0G-40
28,014.0000
POUND
MIX
MIX 1, WGINCI
.0150
$42C.21
9¢�4i 7�maRCQct.T oeL'a�w�aC-o�=OG�G�IG==L�Q�-=���=�=====msaaaaaesCQaCQ�Q�"a=��VQQQQQ:JQ
GLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU FOR YOrJR.-RUSTNFSS1!!1 INVOICE AMOUNT $3,836,12
plua SALES TAX $.00
------------
INVOICE-TOTAL $3,836,12
less PREPAYMENTS $.00
less PAYMENTS $3,836.12
less DISCOUNT $100
LESS DISCOUNT OP $.00
IF PAID BY $.00 DUE 8Y 08/15/10 $.00

• MAR-14-2012 11:06 FROM;BAILEY FOODS LLC 252 235 2278
.0
TO:19195714718 P,22122
GLOVER MILLING CO INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
3038 W HORNES CHURCH RD
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0929
BILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 1227S1
INVOICE DATE 07116110
DATE SHIPPED 07/16/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ♦ - - - - - - - - -
CUSTOMER P.O. NUMBER INVOICE CODES INVOICE TERMS
CO2021 NET 30
��-�--�-�---�-•����-•.••., •.• �����--�--�----���II�=IDO Ci7GOiaaaaaaaaaa=aaass==.:a�GCO70""=tom
uOI►1QlS'ti� '1't!S!•1 i� 251a 0AIA11M REP ij !lllt" PREP RS TDT.XL
m tlldaCv�t�dCt7tl��GCCiOGafpSOtC R4]!!-JlrY®Sf-CL7 fya T.COCC7Oi3Ca ¢avaesea=aa=v:s===��.-. .Y :."'. Y'S, C'..'-i. ."'�.��-��
22.890.0000
ROUND
CORN
LOAN
4.6400
91,896.60
22,090,0D00
POUND
GRIND
GRIND
.0109
5220.90
4,490,0000
POUND
BBANMEAL
L3SANMEAL 48V
.2100
5940.80
044.0090
POUND
GROW -FIN
OROu-FIN 46-17(44)
.6000
@386.40
18,014.0000
POUND
MIX
MIX i BAODING
.01�0
9420.21
s evaRs+aapCpC}R7C CI Ci C7 iAP4C17C�-iOCgaaoGe-s--a---�-�-------o�nC7�YIC nfl tea.. ar.a a.�.a.. ..a erS70Qa-�
CLOVER MILLING CO THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS:::: INVOICE AMOUNT $3,872.91
plues SALES TAX $ • 00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,872.91
legg PREPAYMENTS $.00
leop, PAYMENTS $3,872.91
less DISCOUNT $-00
LESS DISCOUNT OF $.00-------------
IF PAID BY $,00 DUE BY 09/15/10 $-00

1:06 PM
03112/12
• Type
Prestage Farms, Inc
Bill Pmt -Check
Bill Prot -Check
Bill Pmt -Check
Bill
Bill
Bill
E
Bailey Foods, LLC
Vendor QuickReport
All Transactions
Date
Num
Memo Account
Clr
Split
11/24/2010
16625
755 Del'd 51... 101 • Cash in Bank-_
X
220 Account_..
10/25/201G
16477
776 Del'd 51... 101 • Cash in Bank-...
X
220 Account...
9/10/2010
16253
744 Del'd 4/3... 101 Cash in Bank-...
X
220 - Account...
8/3/2010
4302...
744 Del'd 4/3... 220 Accounts Pay...
133 • Pig Inve...
8/3/2010
5142...
776 DeN 51... 220 Accounts Pay...
133 • Pig Inve...
8/3/2010
5282...
755 Del'd 5/... 220 Accounts Pay...
133 • Pig Inve...
Amount
-23,405,00
-24,056.00
-23,064.00
-23,064,00
-24,066,00
-23,405.00
Page 1

1:06 PM
03112/12
Pv Type
�F—jL1- b Bill 7i%�f
Bill y17 (p
Bill ,7 5�-S.
Total
•
•
Bailey Foods, LLC
Bills for Prestage Farms, Inc
All Transactions
Num Date Due Date Aging Amount
4302... 8/3/2010 8113/2010 23,064.00
5142... 8/3/2010 8/13/2010 24,056.00
5282... 8/3/2010 8/13/2010 23,405.00
70, 525.00
Open Balance
0.00
Page 1

ai ey Is, -LC 1
V_e.nsior_Qui�kRe
2!1
I
I
I
April th ugh_Nove- er-20
Type
I Date
Num
Memo I Account I
Split
Amount
Glover Milling Co, Inc
I
I
I
I
Bill
11/30/2010
Nov stmt
3702 #
1220 • Accounts Payable
I
I -SPLIT-
-1,098.70
(Bill
10/31/2010
Oct Stmt
Prestage Hog Feed
220 • Accounts Payable
I
I-SPLIT-
-6,760.75
Bill Pmt -Check
1 10/18/2010
16470
Prestige Pig Feed
101 • Cash in Bank -Checking
1
1220 Accounts Payable
1
1-10,000.00
1
Bill Pmt -Check
10/0512010116343
1
101 Cash in Bank -Checking
220 Accounts Payable
-15,000.00
1
Bill
D9/30120101
Sept Stmt
1
220 Accounts Payable
-SPLIT-
-23,828.09
Bill Pmt -Check
09/28/2010
16342
1 Prestiage Pig Feed
101 • Cash in Bank -Checking
I
220 • Accounts Payable
-10,000.00
Bill Pmt -Check
1 09/13/2010
16247
1
1101 Cash in Bank -Checking
220 • Accounts Payable
-10,000.00
1
Bill Pmt -Check
1 09/09/2010
16246
VOID:
1101 Cash in Bank -Checking
1220 • Accounts Payable
0.00
1
Bill
I Oa/31/201 01
G02021
I Prestige Pig Feed
1220 Accounts Payable
-SPLIT-
-32,821.20
Bill Pmt -Check
1 08/30/2010
16196
1June Stmt
101 -Cash in Bank -Checking
1220 Accounts Payable
-10,000,00
1
IBill Pmt -Check
1 08/20/2010
16142
1
101 • Cash in Bank -Checking
1220 Accounts Payable
-10,000.00
Bill Pmt -Check
08/17/2010
16141
VOID:
101 • Cash in Bank -Checking
1220 Accounts Payable
0.00
Bill Pmt -Check
08/02/2010
16070
101 Cash in Bank -Checking
220 Accounts Payable
-10,000.00
Bill Pmt -Check
I
08/02/2010
16109
VOID: Feed for Prestigel
101 Cash in Bank -Checking
220 Accounts Payable
1
0.00
Bill
07/31/2010
July Stmt
Prestiage Pig Feed
1220 • Accounts Payable
1
-SPLIT-
-27,036,51
1
Bill
1 06/30/2010
Jun Stmt
June Stmt
1220 Accounts Payable
-SPLIT-
-21,346.02
Bill
05/31/2010
May stml
Feed for Prestige Pigs
1220 Accounts Payable
133 • Pig Inventory-Prestage Farm
-10,455.58
1
Bill
1
04/30/2010
Apr Stmt
1220 Accounts Payable
-SPLIT-
-4,361.77
1
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
-20Z 708.62
Page 1 of 1

Mar 14 12 12:48p
Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
�, Evxrar6i
A Favm / CPB-rCX-L � N-
[phone] p.1
� � P�r
�C fun i
11.L
�-14 -1 2
rncI c�cl care. 4;n& S �b oO 0 - � 0 ( f -f-m
S i kQ Cami. A v--- czach i roc) f v i ct v(Z
- red l rmicc - '�r� Olbvez 0 n a
jc)� CAov ev- mt h l 0-0-iG r m t n thc, rnu i+t (LL
d��lu e.S L'c `thy- � l trm Location
V e, CdSG �)a u e_ C , Cl Pr-e 4(12C
go 10
L, -Pm Toc he,lP
3JILI 1 / a

Mar 14 12 12,48p Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
[phone] p,2
GLOVER MILLING CI
3038 W NORNES CHI
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
CH RD
SILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P O BOX 7038
WILSON KC 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 123257
INVOICE DAf-."E 09/16/10
DATE SNIPPED 09/1-6/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF I
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CUSTOMER
P_0- NUMBER
INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERNS
G0202I
NET 30
QUANTITY
I
EM #
DESCRIPTION
REF #F PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
:9,629.co_o
P•OUNL
C4
piq
CORN
5.4400
$1, 995.94
19,620.C000
POUNC
5
IN.
GRIND
.0100
$196.20
3,840.3000
POUND
appCOITAL
HEANMEAL 49%
.25C0
$95o.o0
552.00_0
P.7UNL
a
W-F=N
GROW -FIN 46-37?4.4)
_600C
5331.2C.
24,022.30CC
POUNI;
Rik
MIX 6 6A.GGI:3G
.0100
$240.12
GLOVER MILLING Ct
LESS DISCOUNT Or
IF PAID BY
THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS !1 ! INVOICE AMOUNT $3,633.46
plus SALES TAX 5.00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,633.46
less PREPAYMENTS $.00
less PAYMENTS $.00
less DISCOUNT $.00
$.00--_-___-___-
$3,633.46 DUE BY 10/16/10 $3,633.46

Mar 1412 12:48p Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
[phone] p 3
GLOVER MILLING C
3038 W HORNES CH
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926 .
BILL TO:
BAILEY
P O BOX
WILSON
INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
CH RD
SHIP TO:
IN''JOICE NUMBER 123286
INVOICE DATE 09/17/10
DATE SNIPPED 09/17/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
ODS BAILEY FOODS
7038 P O PDX 7038
2789S WILSON NC 27895
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CUSTOIJER
P.O. NUMBER
INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERMS
G02021
NET 30
QUANTITY
IrEm
#
DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
22,880.0000
pou3Z
CIZAN
COILI
5.4000
5I,205.29
22,880.0000
POUND
G
1ND
GP --ND
- .01CC
y2Z8.80
4,480,C000
POUND
BEANKEAL
BEAIvTiEAL 48%
.2500
5111.20.09
64a10000
POUND
G
H-FIN
GROIi-FIN 46-37(460)
.6G-C
$388.ao
28,008.000C
POUND
NIX
MIX & BAGGINC
.01C0
$2a0.08
GLOVER MILLING
LESS DISCOUNT OF
IF PAID BY
THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!!!! INVOICE AMOUNT
plus SALES TAX
INVOICE TOTAL
less PREPAYMENTS
less PAYMENTS
less DISCOUNT
$.00
$4,223.97 DUE BY 10/17/10
$4,223.97
$.00
------------
$4,223.97
$.00
$.ao
$.00
------------
$4,223,97

Mar 14 12 12:49p Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
[phone] pA
GLOVER MILLING C
3038 W HORNES CH
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BILL TO:
BAILEY
P 0 BOX
WILSON
INC-Mill & Swine-6/l/C4
CH RD
INVOICE NUMBER 123322
INVOICE DATE 09/24,/10
DATE SHIPPED 09/24/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF _
SHIP TO:
DDS BAILEY FOODS
7038 P O BOX 7038
.27895 WILSON NC 27895
CUSTOMER
P.O. NUMBER
INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERMS
G02021
NET 30
QUANTITY
I
EM #
DESCRIPTION
REP ## PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
22,88C.COoo
PCUND
C
RN
CJRN
5.4800
$2,23e.97
22,96C.0000
POUND
G
IND
GRIND
.C100
$228.63
4,480,C000
KUND
B
SAL
BRANMEAL 481k
.2500
$1.,_20.05
646.0000
POLND
C.
m-F=N
GRON-FIN 46-31(460)
.6000
5398.0
29,oCs.0000
POUND
M
X
MI% 6 SAGGING
.010C
S230.0a
GLOVER MILLING C�
LESS DISCOUNT OF
IF PAID BY
THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!!!! INVOICE AMOUNT $4,256.65
plus SALES TALC $.00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $4,256.65
less PREPAYMENTS $.00
leSS PAYMENTS 5.00
less DISCOUNT S.00
$.00------------
$4,256.65 DUE BY 10/24/10 $4,256.65

Mar 1412 12,49p Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
[phone] p.5
GLOVER MILLING C
3038 W HORNES CH
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BILL TO:
BAILEY
P O BOX
WT LSCN
INC-Mill & Svline-6/l/04
CH RD
7038
27895
INVOICE NUMBER 123387
INVOICE DATE 09/29/ 10
DATE SHIPPED 09129/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 CF 1
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P O BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CUSTOMER
P.O. NUM13ER
INVOICE CODES
IN -VOICE
TER14S
G02021
NET 30
QUANTITY
z
EM #
DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
I3IG20.0000
POITIO
cc
P-V
CORN
5.4000
S1,051.9_
I9,6211.0003
POUND
W
IVD
GRIND
.0,00
$196.20
3.640.000:
POUND
37
ANM.-AL
B3AMOLF.AL 4 E %
.2500
$960.00
552.0000
MIX17
Off -FIN
GROW -FIN 46-37(461t)
.6000
$331.2G
24,012 ACOI
POUND
M
%
MI% & BAGGING
.0100
$24C.12
GLOVER MILLING
LESS DISCOUNT OF
IF PAID BY
THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESSI!!! INVOICE AMOUNT
plus SALES TAX
INVOICE TOTAL
less PREPAYMENTS
less PAYMENTS
less DISCOUNT
$.00
$3,619.45 DUE BY 10/29/10
$3,619.45
$.0C
------------
$3,619.45
S . 0 c
$.00
5.00
------------
$3,619.45

Marl 412 12:50p Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
[phone] p.6
GLOVER MILLING C
3038 W HORNES CH
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
CH RD
INVOICE 'NUMBER 123456
INVOICE DATE 10/07/i0
DATE SHIPPED 1.0/07/10
PAGE N-TY-BER 1 OF _
BILL
TO:
SHIP TO:
BAILEY
FOODS
BAILEY FOODS
P O BOX
7038
P O BOX 7038
WILSON
MC 27895
WILSON NC 27995
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CUSTOMcER
P.O. NUMBER
INVOICE'CODES
INVOICE
TERNS
G02021
NET 30
QUANTITY
2
EM #
DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
19,620.0000
POUND CC
RN
CORN
6.6000
$1,9C2.00
13,620.0000
POUND GF
IND
GRIND
.0100
$JyE 2C
1,840.0001
POUND 81
A.NMEAL
13=ANMEAL 4Et
.2500
$960.0C
562.0000
POUMO
OW —FIN
GROW -FIN 46-37(464o)
.5000
$3.1,20
i:,012.000�
POUND N:
X
MLX & BAGGI14G
.0100
$24C,12
GLOVER MILLING CC
LESS DISCOUN`r' OF
IF PAID BY
THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!!'.! INVOICE AMOUNT $3,689.52
plus SALES TAX $.00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $3,689.52
less PREPAYMENTS $.00
less PAYMENTS $.00
less DISCOUNT $.Co
$.00------------
$3,689.52 DUE BY 11/06/10 $3,689.52

Marl 12 12:51 p Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
[phone] p.7
GLOVER MILLING C
3036 W HORNES CH
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
BILL TO:
BAILEY
P 0 BOX
WILSON
INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
CH RD
INVOICE NUMBER 123525
INSIO=CE DATE 10/15/10
DATE SY_IPPED 1C/15/10
PAGE AJUM.IBER 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
DDS BAILEY FOODS
7038 P 0 BOX 7038
27895 WILSON NC 27895
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CUSTOMER
P.O. NUMJ�IER
INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERMS
002021
NET 30
QUANTITY
^�
TI
EMR##
" DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
9,alo.00o0
POUND
CC
RX
CORN
6.1000
s1,UE5.s°
31310.00o0
POUP:D
GF
IND
GRIND
.0130
55a. 10
1,470.npo,7
POUPiO
8
-"MEAL
BZANMEAL 461
._500
$480.00
276,0003
POUND
GF
OR -FIN
GROW -FIN 4E-37446#!
.isDD0
Y1fi5.60
12,006.0009
POUND
X#
MIX 4 BEGGING
.0100
$120.OG
GLOVER MILLING C4
LESS DISCOUNT OF
IF PAID BY
} THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!!!! INVOICE AMOUyT $1,932.35
Pl-US SALES TAX $-00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $1,932.35
less PREPAYMENTS $.00
less PAYMENTS $.00
less DISCOLZVT $.00
$. ao-------------
$1, 932.35 DUE BY 1.1/ w4/10 $1, 932.35

Mar 14 12 12:52p Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
[phone] p.8
GLOVER MILLING C
3038 W KORNES CK
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
INC-Mill & Swine-6/1/04
CH RD
BILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P O BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
_NNTOICE NUMBER 123588
INVOICE DATE 1-0/22/10
DATE SHIPPED 10/22/10
PAGE NUYBaR 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CUSTOMER
P.O. NUMBER
INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERMS
G02021
NET 30
QUANTITY
T
EM-#r__--DESCRIPTION_W
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
1,745.0000
POUND
cc
RN
CORN
6.0400
yISO.21
1, 745.000�
POVNG
Gp
IVD
GRIND
.0100
$37.45
229 0007
POLM
3-A.VHBAL
92AMEAL 46►
.25D0
$e5.00
37.0 DO
POUCIG
Gp
Ow -FIN
GROW -FIN 46•?74464)
.5000
$22.20
2,002.0005
POUND
t,4x
MLX & BAGGING
.O3.00
GLOVER MILLING C<
LESS DISCOUNT OF
IF PAID BY
THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!!!! INVOICE AMOUNT
$3C2.88
plus SALES TAX
$ . 00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL
$302.88
less PREPAYMENTS
$.00
less PAYMENTS
$ . 0 0
less DISCOUNT
$.00
$.00------------
5302.88 DUE BY 11/21/10
5302.88

Mar 14 12 12:53p Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
[phone] p.9
GLOVER MILLING C
3038 W HORNES CH
BAILEY NC 27807
252/237-0926
!NC -Mill & Swine-6/1/04
CH RD
BILL TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P O BOX 7038
WILSON C 27895
INVOICE NUMBER 123631
INVOICE DATE 10/28/10
DATE SHIPPED 10/28/10
PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
SHIP TO:
BAILEY FOODS
P 0 BOX 7038
WILSON NC 27895
----------------
CUSTOMER
-----------------------------------_----------------
P.O. NUMBER
INVOICE CODES
-----------
IN'JOICE
TERMS
G02021
NET 3C
QUANTITY
ITEM
#
DESCRIPTION
REF # PRICE
PREPAID
TOTAL
1.745.0000
POUND
C
7N
CORN
6.1900
$39Z.eE
11145.00Co
POUND
GF
IND
GRIND
.0100
$17.45
220.0000
P:)LTN7
B
AL
AL
BEAMEAL 4E%
,250C
$551CC
37A OCC
PaUND
C
GROW-FIN 46-31(460)
I670.
$0t.'21
2,002.0000
PDUN�
M
MIX & BAGGING L.0100
$I0.02
GLOVER MILLING C(
LESS DISCOUNT OF
IF PAID BY
THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!!!! INVOICE AMOUNT $307.55
plus SALES TAX $.00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $307.55
Less PREPAYMENTS $.00
Less PAYMENTS $.00
less DISCOUNT $.00
$.00------------
$307.55 DUE BY 11/27/10 $307.55

Mar 1412 12;54p Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
[phone] p.10
GLOVER MILLING Ci
3 0 3 8 W HORNES CHI
BAILEY NC 27807
252J2:37-C926
BILL TO:
BAILEY
P O BOX
WILSON
INC-Mill & Swine-6/l/04
CH RD
INVOICE NUMBER 123704
INVCIC E DATE 11/05/i0
DATE SHIPPED 11/05/10
PAGE NUMBER I OF 1
SHIP TO:
ODS BAILEY FOCDS
7038 P C BOX 7038
27895 WILSON NC 27895
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CUSTOMER
P.O. NUMBER
INVOICE CODES
INVOICE
TERMS
G02021
NET 30
QUANTITY
T
EM #
DESCRIPTION
REF ## PRICE
PREPAIr
TOTAL
1,745.000C
P3"D
C
3.N
COCN
6,4000
1,745.00CD
P30Y7
OF
IND
GRIND
.0103
`yi7,45
220.0000
POUND
BEANNEAL
BEANMEAL 481
.25"
$55.JQ
37,0000
Pux'a
G
N-FIN
f3R0?A-F2N 46-31(464)
.6000
522.20
2.002.000C
PDQN_�
M
MIX & BAGGING
.0150
$3C.63
GLOVER MILLING C(
LESS DISCOUNT OF
IF PAID BY
THANKS YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!!!! INVOICE AMOUNT $324.11
plus SALES TAX $.00
------------
INVOICE TOTAL $324.11
less PREPAYMENTS $.00
less PAYMENTS $.00
less DISCOUNT $.00
$.00------------
$324.11 DUE BY 12/05/10 $324.11

PW
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
•''1I r - •n In- � `I`
July 22, 2009
�JI
Robert C. Hunt ewe,
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Andrews Hunt Farms, LLC
P. 0.908
Bailey, NC 27807
Subject: Additional Information Request
Application No. AWS350022
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Hunt:
The Animal Feeding Operation Unit of Division of Water Quality's Aquifer Protection Section has
completed a preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is
required before we may continue our review. Please address the following items within 30 (thirty) days
of receipt of this letter:
Chanee in animal numbers and operation type:
The number and type of animals specified in your permit application are different than those
specified in your Nutrient Management Plan. Your permit application is for 2169 Farrow to Wean
swine, which does not match the WUP which is for 1800 Farrow to Feeder swine. Please complete
and submit a new Nutrient Management Plan Certification and a new WUP to reflect the changed
animal numbers and operation type. Please be advised that the swine operation may not exceed
their permitted steady state live weight (SSLW) without meeting the performance standards
specified in Senate Bill 1465. A copy of this bill can be found at:
hUp://www.neleiz.net/Sessions/2007/Bills/Senate/HTML/Si 465v7.html
A blank copy of the Animal. Waste Management Plan Certification can be downloaded from the following
web link:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.uslaps/afou/documents/Animal WasteManagementSystemCertificationForm091806.doc
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and
regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the
responsibility of the applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items shall
result in future requests for additional information.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised
and/or additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated, with two (2) copies submitted to my
attention to the Mail Service Center address at the bottom of this page. Please note that failure to provide
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www ncwat r alit or Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportune ylAffimtiative Action Employer— 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper
N��hCaro '
,Naturrrh
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax I: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

this additional information on or before the requested date may result in your application being returned
as incomplete.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may
result in a civil.penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would
constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to
$25,000 per day.
If y h!v4anyy estions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry W. Wade PE
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Murphy Brown, LLC (P. O. Box 856, Warsaw NC 28398-0856)
APS Files- AWS350022

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit • - Liquid Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with tl e
Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections
which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered. .3.
Application Date: G —16 — f 7
I. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
1. One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit- Animal
Waste Operations;
2. Two copies of a general location map indicating_the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3. Two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, one must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
I. Farm's name: An drews-Hunt Farrn, �'�siq� iA
2. Print Land Owner's name: R.C. Hunt _
3. Land Owner's Mailing address: PO Box 7119
City: Wilson NC Zip: 27893-
Telephone Number:
4. County where farm is located: Franklin
5. Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): _ r4 L!t %d BONG 7D 2,-eo
G. Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): _ cP fi NG-c- 2 Dz ,9 A/
7. Lessee's 1 Integrator's name (if applicable; please e n WNCITyp� TiTd){ ��G�9sf/f fi�%2 S
35 - 22 U L5 it 15
AUG - 61997
HN{d RALflCN °'
DORM: AWO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 1 of 3

` III: OPERATION INFORMATION:
I. Farm No.: _3J-22
2. Operation Description: Swine ol2era(iQn
Farrow to Feeder
1800 - Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? IJ yes; [::]no.
If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Tyne of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Tyne of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish - 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: A✓DNo, of Animals;. Al
3. Acreage cleared and available for application: 70.M ; Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP):
4. Number of Lagoons: 1 ; Total Capacity:
Number of Storage Ponds: ; TotaI Capacity:
5. Is animal waste being applied on any field which has subsurface drains?
6. Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity of or under the lagoon?
IV. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
Cubic Feet (ft3)
Cubic Feet (ft3)
YES or (please circle one)
YES or(Eq) (please circle one)
I, /? e, h4,IV T (Land Owner's name listed in question 1I.2), attest that
this application for LdIV iiLV �iV - ! 9 n s_ t Crfs7-4G1 � I (Farm name listed in question 1I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature 2,e. , 44 '�" Date
V . MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, PC 4 (Manager's name listed in question II.6), attest that this
application for 4N4�4Ws /e/,W�✓1—/4 ! Z�—,rAG!' _ _ _(Farm name listed in question 1I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. l understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete. n
Signature _/ _ _ _Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: A WO-G-E 2/26/97 Page 2 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form / Survey
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Liquid "Animal Waste Operations
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (2/97)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Beaufort
Jones
Buncombe
Madison
Bertie
Lenoir
Burke
McDowell
Camden
Martin
Caldwell
Mitchell
Chowan
Pamlico
Cherokee
Polk
Craven
Pasquotank
Clay
Rutherford
Currituck
Perquimans
Graham
Swain
Dare
Pitt
Haywood
Transylvania
Gates
Tyrell
Henderson
Yancey
Greene
Washington
Jackson
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Dr,
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
0
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Wilmington Regional WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Ansori
Moore
Alexander
Lincoln
Brunswick New Hanover
Blamen
Richmond
Cabamrs
Mecklenburg
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan
Columbus Pender
Harnett
Sampson
Cleveland
' Stanly
Duplin
Hoke
Scotland
Gaston
Union
Montgomery
Iredell
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance
Rockingham
Alleghany
Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: AWO-G-E 2/97 Page 3 of 3

JUL-11-1597 16:26 FROM ConsolidatedPlanning TO
2915415 P.02
Producer: .�. dFwyy 6A, KS
Location: Cord7r
Address: p o- eQX -7 / 19
LU1L50AJ R1.r:- 2789?
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animal Units: /do o
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water.
The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the
amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so
that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the
crops to be grown.
Several factors are ,important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the
nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different
infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied
to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is frozen_
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters_
Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind
odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied
to a growing crop or not more than 30 days prior to planting.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements may
be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility.
,amount of waste nrodugg per year
I Loa _ animal units x /$ waste/animal unit/year =
pp waste/year
Amount of Nitgga!en produce_ dpgz year,
Fop— animal units X ( .5 lbs N/animal unit/year =
Iff-700 lbs. N/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.

JUL-11-1997 15=27 FROM
ConsolidatedPlanning TO
2915419 F.03
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to grown and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Real. Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Yield Per Ac Utilized Application
!
WEoomm
8Lwc,awrA
3.5
/7
-7, v
SZ5
A 'r-5
2
r
r
3.5 -r
/75
5.5
3.5 T
/7
!•s
Z�3
Jr
rr
3.s 7r
/�s�
Or6
05
s
3,s-r
175
p.S
89
3.5-r
/7S
.3.5
Total. Table 1 1 q, 1. 1 2ssl
Table 2:_
Tract Field Soil Crop Real. Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Yield Per Ac Utilized Application
Wk—Dat* R
175
3.
683
Q ►
!D
rr
3sT
175
285
�98
I
Y
JrJ� I
c
/7,/
J c
!Jr 0
Z4O?S
Total Table 2 5$ + c (6 q 6
Total Table 1 1y• (0 25 5 -?
Total `� 0, 0 f Z Z 53
Amount of N Produced / -70 D
Surplus or qgicD 553

JUL-11-1997 16:28 FROM
' r �
ConsolidatedFlanning TO
2915415 F.04
Your facility is designed for /80 days of temporary storage and
needs to have the temporary storage removed every 6 months.
where owners of animal operations do not have adequate amounts of land
to apply the waste, the producer must provide a written agreement
whereby another landowner has agreed to land apply or allow land
application on his or her land.
Call the Soil Conservation Service or Soil and Water Conservation
District office after you receive the waste analysis report to obtain
the amount per acre to apply and the application rate prior to
applying the waste.
Narrative of Operation:
&ZaAL_QL1Li-e 9P�/'eon 64 ��r, ��o�r' c.Jrn ` i� 6U., 42ndfo1W
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT
I agree to carry out this waste management plan according to the terms
of the agreement. Failure to comply with the waste management plan
will automatically require any cost share funds to be refunded to
their source.
Producer: �L_._C. , zer,Date:
I understand that Mr./Mrs. does not have
ample land to apply the animal waste produced from his/her animal
operation. I have agreed to utilize the waste produced from the
operation and agree to carry out this waste management plan on land
that I own or operate.
Recipient Landowner:
system Designer:
6PSWCD Representative:gz
Date:
Date:
Date:
Design Approval: Date:
4;/1 �/ 9
ZI741

JUi_-11-1997 16:29 FROM ConsolidatedPlanning TO 2ti1541S P.Z;5
xS r Iu Id isk g o+-,} ea C— �.
3 z 1 A-e.
/a 3, a
.1 3 .z. )
7o .: �

s
type of Visit: 77ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency Q Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit:15/291U( Arrival Time: +� Departure Time: County: , ISQNRegion: QRO
Farm Name: Anr1 t`P`e �R _ 14Lai- Frnt-vv" ChS I G Owner Email:
Owner Name: A nk 6 e «us �a�c rv-t L. LC� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator;
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
a 4 R s N2s zo e. a s egg t l,a
Integrator:
Certification Number: as ,Q L
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
+Desin
C«urrent
Design Current
wine Capacity Pop.
"P.
WePop.
-
C«atlle Capacity
Wean to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
Dai Calf
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Feeder to Finish...
Q
Current
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Dr Cow
=Design
Farrow to Feeder
Dry P■oultrr
C*-9 a}ci
Yo
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Gilts
Non -La ers
Boars
Pullets
NJ
I Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
WIWKOt
Turkey Poults
El Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ZNo ❑NA ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
CZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
E21 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

` '
Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes []"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): t`J
5. Are there any immediate threats to the i—ntegrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L�]-No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Sri , 4LQ C: r%p
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [E]'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes EINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [—]Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[' J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P N
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �No
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

•
� Facility Number: -t;5j 'e7k, I I Date of Inspection: ,J/orb
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/inspector Signatui
Page 3 of 3
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [g No
❑ Yes No
[:]Yes No
y
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: Q 1.5 ? 21 � 24
Date: c2
/1 /?""
214,12015

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection n Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:OM7M Arrival Time: (' Departure Time: County: Region: (Rgn
Farm Name: C°.u�5�a i [x Owner Email:
Owner Name: (20— 1-4 u h1 + Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: (o, �Au 0+
Back-up Operator:.
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: ain aas ati a
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
(o,07G1 fV r7�. )01yW
22'Y Z�2c � Cad [°rx.s+a I(A
Design Current
k
. , Design C*ur.rCut
Design
Current
Swine
Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity Pop.
C*attle
Capacity
Pop.
M ,
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, Poultry
Caacit P,a .
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Nan -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
I JBpi-f
Brood Cow
Turkeys
Qther
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
❑ Yes EZ�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (Ifyes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
j�-No
TT
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
E�-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
[7Z,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - jDate of Inspection:, b
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA I❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? TT
If any of questions 4-5 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes J;a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 7
' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste ApDlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes _W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12, Crop Type(s): S 91
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available'?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes rVr No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes PZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
�0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continuer)

L
Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste
�application equipment as�required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No
25 Is t ela t y out of com1ian2 itr�' Ii permit cGfiditionr s�lal-eKo sl'u`dge? f y� ❑ Yes -[ No
the appropriate box(es) below, a0 19 Sur--b ra fi'
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 I. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [Z�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ,—O—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes .0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes *o
❑ Yes t�No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
i] NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/InspectorN=6Oi rj\'Q "�Q �-(\CaPhone: Q)
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015

In
Type of Visit: mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O 'Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit;-, ZoRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: L ! ` �"� I Departure Time: County: Regio0
Farm Name: Oi-Y Ay i r .n tt�"1 FL`yt.���tv1 Owner Email: CC I Ls- ' no— (I c M
Owner Name: P\f'(X U 1- LJD �� i uyY�n [_ �,[z Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Q_ Integrator:(,
Certified Operator: l ktyxJ _ _ Certificatioh Nu r:
Sack -up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design Current
Design
Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
YAW
Wet Poultry Capaci�y Pop.
Cattle Capacity
Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
esign Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
F.11a
llrF P�oultr, acit P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
7Non-La
ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Other EfTurkeyPoults
ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes,4n—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters ofthe State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes 4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system`? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes 9�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
El Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
IF
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes //fdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [] Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0"No D NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to'roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes j6No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes k? o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s) 01 n1 aCQ 2 n
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes 7fNo
❑ Yes P No
Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes FNo
[:]Yes 4 No
❑ Yes pll�o
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes O'No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes KjNo
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes &
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

•[Facility Number: - Date of Ins ection:
4. Did the
effacility
(fail
ltto calibrate waste application
�e�wpm , t,as�equired by the permit? ❑Yes o
�s the -fac�ty out ofcm nc /wit permit c�o�nditi7fnJrdla�ed to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes No
the appropriate box(es) below. & /// fi q <;l. O 15 4- ao j (.r,
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA LINE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
;6No
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Yes 6o
❑ Yes ?fNo
❑ Yes VfNo
❑ Yes (n0
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes ffNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES, answers and/or any additional recommendations.'or any other"comments:
Use,drawings of facility,to,better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
J11 y 1/30
f
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signati
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412015

Type of visit: K Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (� Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: rrival Time: I Departure Time: County: Region:Q
Farm Name: j� n i`P ��5�uy Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: (3,("Certification Number: O. S a 4
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: tt
S (o 14 +a f- t'c �s ' S E800r•Q +o s nS4ZO e &Wd
Design Current
gnCurrent
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet MrDesi
pacity Pop.
Cattle
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, Paultr.
Caaaci no ,
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Caw
Turke s
Other
TurkeyPoults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
VOIX0
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
O�>p
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[]Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 21412011 Continued

Facility Num er: 4,12fDate of Inspection: D
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1 ady/1
Spillway?: °�
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [31ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks);2'No
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ;�J'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
'C21!go
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
LRr io
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0INo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�iNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
�o
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
,E] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facfli)yyfail(too ccalibrat (waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Xn
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is th�flity//out ot`�mp�iance [vith permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes I /I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
. If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes A No ❑ NA [] NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Eyes Z'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes FzNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes FjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
alItilILl
'U.J16)I� I $�
10-l0 -0 11119
i- -lN - Ls t, S R
r
�r
Ll
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: j I'aq
2141201

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
350022 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS350022
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Franklin Region:
Raleigh
Date of Visit:
04111/2014 Entry Time: 09:00 am
Exit Time: 9:45 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Andrews Hunt Farms LLC
Phone:
252-991-4664
Mailing Address:
PO Box 7038
Wilson NC 278957038
Physical Address:
299 Inscoe Rd
Castalia NC 27816
Facility Status:
0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36' 04' Longitude: 78° 06' 05"
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts . Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert C Hunt Operator Certification Number: 25249
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representathre(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name R. C. Hunt Phone :
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspectlan Summary:
4/8/14 @ 106 gpm
3/30/13 0=1.5 P=7,4
Soil report 2/14/14 Lime recommended- Liming every three years.
2110114 0.89
10/14/13 1.55
5/22/13 1.99
Keep track of application windows-
12 applications on Rye in April 2013
9 applications on Rye in April 2014- Checking with agronomist to extend Rye window. If not extended then it is a 30 day pre -plant
for Sudan
page: 1

Permit: AW5350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/11/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,645
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Typo Identifier Closed Data Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON 07/26/94 18.60
page: 2

Permit: AWS350022 Owner -Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/11/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges &_Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
Cl
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
MEI
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
00
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes NQ Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑M
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks„ or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/11/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yea No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑M
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E0
❑
determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
19. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ M ❑ ❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/11/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
Cl
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structurs(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No No Me
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑0
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑M
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
350022 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS350022
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Franklin Region:
Raleigh
Date of Visit:
04/11/2014 Entry Time: 09:00 am
Exit Time: 9:45 am Incident tl
Farm Name:
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Andrews Hunt Farms LLC
Phone:
252-991-4664
Mailing Address: PO Box 7038 Wilson NC 278957038
Physical Address: 299 Inscoe Rd Castalia NC 27816
Facility Status: NCompliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Latitude: 36' 04'
Longitude: 78" 06' 05"
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert C Hunt Operator Certification Number: 25249
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Silo Reprosontative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name R. C. Hunt Phone:
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
4/8/14 @ 106 gpm
3/30/13 0=1.5 P=7.4
Soil report 2/14/14 Lime recommended- Liming every three years.
2/10/14 0.89
10/14/13 1155
5/22/13 1.99
Keep track of application windows-
12 applications on Rye in April 2013
9 applications on Rye in April 2014- Checking with agronomist to extend Rye window. If not extended then it is a 30 day pre -plant
for Sudan
page: 1

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/11 /14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,800 1,645
Total Design Capacity: 1,800
Total SSLW: 939,600
Waste Structures
Dlsignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON 07/26/94 18.60 31,00
page: 2

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms l- Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/11/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
You No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3, Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na Na
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
■ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
Cl
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3
I

Permit. AWS350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number:
Inspection Dale: 04/11/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
350022
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑N
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
013
❑
Records and Documents
Yea_
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Cl
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

0
Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/11/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
yes No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
E ❑
❑
Other Issues
You No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29.'At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑E
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 5

Facility Number ®- Division of Soil and Water Conservation
� Other Agency
Type of Visit: IcKompliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: _2rokoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
. I .
Date of Visit: 1 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: d �P t o 7:5�) �� E[Lc m La t 14 r Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pap.
Wean to Finish
Wet Poultry
La er
on -Layer
Design
Capacity
Design
Current
Pop.
Current
Design
Cattle C**specify
DairyCow
DairyCalf
DairyHeifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
113eef Feeder
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Dr, P,oultr, C:a aci P,o
Layers
Non -Layers
Gilts
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ YesJE3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑.NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [3 Yes E]'1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes_ e' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

lFacility Number: Date of Inspection: �
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ YesoNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ;2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ;3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify•DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes �Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes` o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes)2�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[] Yes Z�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Oyes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes )zNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes _ONO ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
_Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ;_Z�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
T
❑ WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili ;Number: Date of Ins ection:-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Ef�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
9No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
F�4o
❑NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes gfNo
[:]Yes Z No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question;•#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
NZ - ICLt&Lj.,vim,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: '
Page 3 of 3
Phone: -! l 9 191 74?
Date:
21412011

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
350022 Facility Status:
Active Permit. AWS350022
Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Franklin Region:
Raleigh
Date of Visit:
04/22/2013 Entry Time: 10:30 am
Exit Time: 11:30 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castaiia)
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Andrews Hunt Farms LLC
Phone:
252-991-4664
Mailing Address:
PO Box 7038
Wilson NC 278957038
Physical Address:
299 Inscoe Rd
Castalia NC 27816
Facility Status:
0Compliant F1 Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Latitude:
36' 04' Longitude: 78' 06' 05"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert C Hunt Operator Certification Number: 25249
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name R. C. Hunt Phone
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

r
Permit: AWS350022 Owner- Facility., Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/22/13 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Dlsignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON 07/26/94 1t v
page: 2

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/22/13 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
Cl ❑
[]
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yea No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.ed large
❑
1110
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yea No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑ Cl
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/22/13 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fall to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
-Yes
No No Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
13013
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS350022 Owner -Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/22/13 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason far Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Me No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
[]
22. Did the facility fait to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
[]
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes ,yq„Ne No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
page: 5

15 -as
•i' Di'vigian of Water Quality
Facility Number ©- i Division of Soil and Water Conservation
� Uther Agency
Type of Visit: 10Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation ()Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: QlRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Timer Departure Time: County: 'V "egion: �Qf�
Farm Name: 0r`l 5-( ,111, Owner Email:
Owner Name: AM JJA 04 Z O UU,211t Za­L Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
Capacity
Current Design Current Design Current
Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Layer Dairy Cow
11
Wean to Feeder
INon-Layer I
Design Current
.o ,
Layers
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
119 00
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
OtherI
Other
Turkeys
ITurkeyPoults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Faciluv-INunrber: 3 bate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [—]Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ];�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes jZ5"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes PrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes jEl'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes J21No
0 NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement`?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes D"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes LErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
[] NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 07No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes VI —No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [] Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes V1 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis [:]Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes En No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �NO
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facil; .Number: -Q Vk5T jDate of Inspection:
2A Di Ihe,�acility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
255.. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes FNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. feu
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, aver -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes V1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
r'tl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
(4)No
[DNA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any'other comments.,
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
W009aa�- 1a-19-121 N= I•S°1
Goon 1 nag $ -r5- r CP' rj= 1 rd D
o0S53� -ay-ram
31aR 3��'s
Ca 1 t b M- o rJ 17 / a -/ s—
f' {v y 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name: arve_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 67% / 91_V3____2K
Date: -1-1h _0 bty
ai4rzO

w
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑
Other Agency
Facility Number: 350022 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS350022
Denied Access
Inpsectlon Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Franklin Region:
Raleigh
Date of Visit: 03/13/2012 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 10:30 am Incident #
Farm Name: Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC
Phone:
252-991-4664
Mailing Address: PO Box 7038
Wilson NC 278957038
Physical Address: 299 Inscoe Rd
Castalia NC 27816
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brawn LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude:
36' 04' Longitude:
78' 06' 05"
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert C Hunt
Operator Certification Number:
25249
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name R. C. Hunt
Phone
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
35-22
Integrator: Murphy Brown LLC
All land is owned by producer. 26 Acres previously purchased with the intent of appling. Please do not apply animal waste until
WUP is updated. Waste and Soil Analysis were viewed on-line and compared to records at the farm. Waste analyses consist of
four (4) individual events. Soil analysis is based on fields and lime was required for several pulls. Calibrations were completed
in 2010, Next calibration is due (every two years) on or before December 31, 2012. All fees appear to be up to date. Freeboard
records were not in book, fax to RRO as soon as possible. Rainfall and inventory were also reviewed at the time of this
inspection. Improve drainage at back of houses and determine source of buildup In the area. Previous inspection had a leak it
appears to have been repaired.
V hours of continuing education needed before 2012
Mortality is buried.
page: 1

Of
Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 03/13/12 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,800 1,785
Total Design Capacity: i,600
Total SSLW: 939,600
Waste Structures
Dls[gnated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON 07/26/94 18,60 28.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 03/13/12 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
350022
Routine
Discharges & Stream „Impacts
Yea
No Nj Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑M
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
_Yjj t!g No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Ne Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0 M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page. 3

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 03/13/12 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste_Appllcation
Yes No NA N
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Solt Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑N
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
SO
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fall to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑N
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WIIP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 03/13/12 Inpsection Type:. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
350022
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes Ug Ne No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
[]
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation. of an actively certified operator In charge?
❑
[]
❑
27. Did the facility fall to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
E ❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
N ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface Tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E0
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
N ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: f Region: (0w
Farm Name: And f etus Ho eyn FrLc, m60-4 �+wner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: DAUE-0hS1 Qt`[r�rt3ln �LC,
Certified Operator: &Q ?C'i� Nynfi Certification Number: 0r7 D `-t 9
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultr-.y
Capacity
Pap. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Finish Layer
Dai Cow
DairyCalf
DairyHeifer
Feeder
Non -La er
o Finish
o Wean
Dr, P.oultr,
Design
Ca aeit
Current D Cow
o Feeder
P,o Non -Dairy
o Finish
EBoars
Layers
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turke Poults
JEJ
I Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes eNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
DNA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: o� Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
XNo [] NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Q�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? %
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[]Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes �] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes V] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes JA No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes L;� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
L;3�'Tqo
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
ofYes
[:)No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application "IR'�Veekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall Q Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facility, N u mbr: - Dne inspection:
24. pi to +a ilit f it to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the per it?
[p
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Q aa M
25. Is t e facility out of compliancelVith permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge
levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification`?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ YesNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency'?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments....
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
K) .ate a 0 1 a. ,
Lpop
aAX IZPI� t
a '4
14 , In !") �A 0Imo+ Ed " o " hun VW00Ac-H he-L 0-101 9-
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur,
Page 3 of 3
Phone: '" oC oo
Date: 3
21412011

NCDAACS Agronomic Division
Phone: [phone] Web site: www.acagr.gov/agranomi/
Grower: Hunt, Robert C (RC)
Report No: 03871
Pg 2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
No Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P2O5
K2O
Alg
S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
E 23
1st Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
-3
2nd crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.46 1.13
3.9 64.0
IA 5.9 173
147
35.0
12.0
140
96
103
59
59
35
38
0.1
Field information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P2O5
K2O
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
F 25
Is[ Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
80-100
30-50
0
0
2
0
.0
0
1
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
80-100
90-110
0
0
$
0
.0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
GEC BS%
Ac p H P-I
K 1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N
NH3-N
No
MIN 0.36 1.15
3.8 79.0
0.8 6.4 21
49
53.0
19.0
161
101
108
26
26
17
26
4.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P2O5
K2O
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
G 24
1st Crop: Small Grains
IAT
80-100
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
10
1
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-A!(I)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1
NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.81 0.98
5.7 54.0
2.6 5.3 211
197
24.0
12.0
24
24
31
50
50
33
36
0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P2O5
K2O
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
H 22
1st Crap: Small Grains
.5T
80-100
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
3
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mu-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.22 1.16
4.0 73.0
1.1 5.5 111
250
2&0
13.0
242
155
162
33
33
26
30
0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P2O5
K2O
Mg
S
Cu
Zn •
B
Mn
See Note
13
Isl Crop: Small Grains
0
80.100
70-90
0
0
I5-20
0
0
.0
pIl$
-3
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
70-90
0-20
0
15-20
0
0
.0
pH$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(I)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S 1
SS-1
NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.18 0.99
6.1 93.0
0.4 6.7 24
110
66.0
19.0
250
149
156
88
88
56
25
0A

NCDAKS Agronomic Division
Phone: [phone] Web site: www.neW.gov/agronemi/
Report No: 03871
Grower:
Hunt,
Robert C (RC)
Copies To:
823 Cardinal Dr
r.
-
SoiiTestReport
V dson,
NC 27896
SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Farm
Received: 08/24/2010 Completed: 09/01/2010 Links W Helpful Information
Franklin County
Agronomist Comments
12
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
time
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zu
B Mn
See Note
A 1 1
1st Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
-3
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC B5% Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu4
S-1
SS-1 1Y03-N
A714-N
Na
MIN 0.27 1.11
7.0 86.0 1.0 6.1 75 232
50.0
19.0
60
44
51
120
120
39
31
0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year -
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
13 1 2
1sl Crop: Small Grains
0
80-I00
0
30-50
0
20-25
0
0
.0 pH$
-3
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140.180
0
90-110
0
20-25
0
0
.0 pH$
i2
Test Results
Sol! Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K 1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na .
MIN 0.22 1.33
4.2 88.0 0.5 6.7 164 49
61.0
21.0
160
95
102
264
264
49
25
0,1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zu
B Mn
See Note
C 13
Ist Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
-3
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0
0-20
0
0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1
Zn-Al
C04
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N
AWN
Na
THIN 0.32 1.04
4.9 82.0 0.9 6.2 118 109
46.0
25.0
303
189
196
too
i00
32
34
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zu
B Mn
See Note
D 21
1A Crop: Small Grains
1T
80-100
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
-3
2nd Crap: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0
0
0
' 0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
bin-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 A'03-N
AWi4-A'
Iva
MIN 0.60 0.94
5.8 69.0 1.8 5.3 178 212
34.0
16.0
297
189
195
125
125
49
44
0.3

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division
Phone: [phone] Web site: www.neagr.gov/agronomi/
Grower: Hunt, Robert C (RC)
Report No: 03871
Pg 3
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P105
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See A'ote
J 5
1st Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
20-40
0
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$
-1
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
20-40
0
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/Y
CEC BS%
At pH P-1
K-I
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-Al(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1 NO3-N
AWN
Na
MIN 0.13 1.07
6.9 94.0
0.4 6.8 48
160
53.0
30.0
64
36
43
81 81
49
34
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
K4
Is[ Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0-20
0
0 0
0
0
.0 0
-3
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0-20
2040
0 0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/Y
CEC BS%
At pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-Al(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.32 0.94
4.3 79.0
0.9 5.8 61
90
49.0
19.0
133
93
Wo
924 924
42
30
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
L SUB
lst Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0-20
0
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0-20
10-30
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$
i2
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/Y
CEC BS%
At pH P-1
K-I
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1 NO3-N
AWN
Na
MIN 0.51 1.01
7.7 92.0
0.6 6.7 62
106
63.0
23.0
138
82
89
106 106
36
26
0.1
North Carol i na Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you jor using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner ofAgricullure
Tobacco Trust fund Commission

NCDA&C5 Agronomic Division
Phone: [phone] Web site: www.neagr.gov/agronend/
Grower: Hunt, Robert C (RC)
Report No: 03871
Pg 2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
E 23
1st Crop: Small Grains
0
80400
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
-1
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
AC pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
R03-,V NH4-,V
Na
MIN 0.46 1.13
39 64.0
1.4 5.9 173
147
35.0
12.0
140
96
103
59
59
35
38
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. . Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P203
Kz0
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
F 25
Isl Crap: Small Grains
0
80-100
80-100
30-50
0
0
2
0
.0
0
1
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
80-100
90-110
0
0
$
0
.0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 .
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N NH4 N
Na
MIN 0.36 1.15
3.8 79.0
0.8 6.4 2l
49
53.0
19.0
161
101
108
M
26
17
26
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
G 24
Isl Crop: Small Grains
IAT
80-100
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
10
-1
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.81 0.98
5.7 54.0
2.6 5.3 211
197
24.0
12.0
24
24
31
50
50
33
36
0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample ,Vo. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
H 22
[st Crop: Small Grains
.5T
80.100
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
1
2nd Crap: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140.180
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-Al(2)
Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.22 1.16
4.0 73.0
1.1 5,5 111
250
28.0
13.0
242
155
162
33
33
26
30
0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
Kz0
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
13
Ist Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
70-90
0
0
15-20
0
0
.0
pH$
-1
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-I80
70-90
0-20
0
15-20
0
0
.0
PH$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Co%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1
Zn-AI - Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.18 0.99
6.1 93.0
0.4 6.7 24
110
66.o
i9.o
250
149
156
88
88
56
25
0.1

NCDA&C5 Agronomic Division
Phone: [phone] Web site: www.neW.gov/agranomi/
Report No: 03871
Grower-
Hunt,
Robert C (RC)
Copies To:
823 Cardinal Dr
-
_ P
Soil
Wilson,
NC 27896
.
Test Reortp
�"�a�,n, -
SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Farm:
Received: 08/24/2010
Completed: 09/01/2010 Links to Helpful Information
Franklin County
Agronomist Comments
12
Field information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Role
A 1 I
1st Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
-1
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V
CEC BS% Ac PH P-1 K-I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-I
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.27
1.11
7.0 86.0 1.0 6A 75 232
50.0 19.0
60
44
51
120
I20
39
31
0.2
Field,Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations.
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
8 12
Ist Crap: Small Grains
0
80-100
0
30-50
0
20-25
0
0
.0 pH$
-2
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140.180
0
90-110
0
20-25
0
0
.0 pH$
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K 1
Ca% Mg%
Mn4
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu4
S 1
SS-1 NO3-N
NH!-N
No
MIN 0.22
1.33
4.2 88.0 0.5 6.7 164 49
61.0 21.0
160
95
102
264
264
49
25
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime .
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg
S
Cn
Zn
B Mn
See Note
C 13
1sl Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
.3
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140.180
0
0-20
0
0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-Al(1)
Mn-Al(2)
Zr,4
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1 NO3-N N714-N
Na
MIN 0.32
1.04
4.9 82.0 0.9 6.2 118 109
46.0 25.0
303
189
196
100
100
32
34
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P20s
K20
Mg
S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
D 21
1st Crop: Small Grains
IT
80-100
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
-3
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V
CEC BS% Ac ' PH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn4
Mn-AI(1)
Mn-Al(2)
Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4 -N
Na
MIN 0.60
0.94
5.8 69.0 1.8 5.3 178 212
34.0 16.0
297
188
195
125
125
49
44
0.3

NCDAMS Agronomic Division
Phone: [phone] Web site: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Grower: Hunt, Robert C{RC)
Report No: 03971
Pg 3
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
No Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
J 5
Isl Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
20-40
0
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
20-40
0
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$
122
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K 1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(l)
Mn-Al(2)
Zn-1 Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIN 0.13 1.07
6.9 94.0
0.4 6.8 48
160
53.0
30.0
64
36
43
81 81
49
34
0.1
Field information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
K 4
Isl Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0-20
0
0 0
0
0
.0 0
1
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0-20
2040
0 0
0
0
.0 0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH RI
K1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(l)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-1 Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1 h03-N
NH4-N
Na
MIA, 0.32 0.94
4.3 79.0
0.9 5.8 61
90
49.0
19.0
133
93
100
924 924
42
30
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn
See Note
L SUB
Is[ Crop: Small Grains
0
80-100
0-20
0
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$
I
2nd Crop: Sud/Sorg Pas
0
140-180
0-20
10-30
0 0
0
0
.0 pHS
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-I
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1
Mn-AI(l)
Mn-AI(2)
Zn-I Zn-Al
Cu-1
S 1
SS-1 NO3-N
NH4-N
Na
MIA' 0.51 1.01
7.7 92.0
o.6 6.7 62
106
63.0
23.0
139
82
89
106 106
36
26
0.1
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
<t through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
�K-1
Ailk
-
Thank you jar using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission

41
Type of Visit
Compliance Inspection
Q Operation Review O Structure Evaluation
O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
Routine O Complaint
O Follow up 0 Referral Q Emergency
O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ' Arrival Time: i Departure Time: I County: FfY o k IL''1 Region:
Farm Name:1 nr_., f't o s 1At + JEbL I'M O S4 jl�Owner Email:
Owner Name: W Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c = , Longitude: = ° = 1
Design Current
Design Current
Design
Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ DairyCow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ DairyCalf
❑ DairyHeifer
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
I)r.y Poultry
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑Beef Stacker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl I
❑ Boars
Other.
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes )eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
;�,,,
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�
ICI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 4� l
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): `
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes LZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ,�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ,rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
VrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
,KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
FfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
sir ..•ii",. �, t �..;��'�"rii►s.{
Comments,(refer to question#} Explain any YES°answers and/or any recommendat►gns or any gthera.com ents.
Use dnawtngs:,of facility to better explain situations: (use additional pages'as I Ski
Reviewer/Inspector Names
1. Phone. 00
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:Aiau_
Date: laqI
1 12128704 Continued

• r .
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the apppropriiaate box. ElWUP ❑ Checklists ElDesign ❑ Maps ElOther
Cl N
21. Does record kee ing need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application I0 Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility cfaaiil to calibrate waste a plicati n equipZ
nt as re uired by e permit?
Cali
ld e aciltty ail to conduct a s udge survey as regwr bythe permit?
e �` r��i 4I rl.. f T to . '? I �l �.e.cL c l t7
6. i facility ail to ave activ ly c rti led operator in charge.
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes , TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes AfNo
ElNA
[INE
El Yes Yes �1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
e No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
JZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
21No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
;9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additio,nalComments andlor;Drawings
JAM" a-1 w �,LG� o%� 6e
W0
`
't ern pW_bA d LA "U-.,L- eA_
SaA u.r o C� -UY\ ticLak c �►-�
(
Page 3 of 3
12128104

bu-r-,c -
hVISel pl
n�
y m
-e, C) S; I OM
Ll
Q 2 OM
Nm

. • •
/ 20 @ .M
Permit: f) U.T3 35009 a. Phone: 3 a 61
Name / Contact:_O-a5ia � CA R rxd C eL,-lS W u rN+
LL
Integrator., f n1A jL4 Ba C. Designed:TQT1q ft.() — la Q�_Size: 1$ On
Fees:
Sludge
Structure: Survey: Extension:
Structure: Survey: Extension:
Structure: Survey: _ Extension:
Structure Survey: Extension:_
Structure: Survey: _ _ Extension:
Calibration:
Notes:
1- j7- l D

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 350022 Facility Status: Active
permit: AWS350022
Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Franklin Region:
Raleigh
Date of Visit: 02/24/2011 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 10:30 am Incident #
Farm Name: Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC
Phone:
252-991-4664
Mailing Address: PO Box 7038
Wilson NC 278957038
Physical Address: 299 Inscoe Rd
Castalia NC 27816
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude:
36' 04' Longitude:
78' 06' 05"
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert C Hunt Operator Certification Number: 25249
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Reprosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name R. C. Hunt Phone:
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
• page: 1 -

■
Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 02/24/11 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
A Compliance Inspection was conducted on this swine facility, by staff from the Division of Water quality. The facility consists of a
1,800 animal, swine farrow to feeder, lagoon liquid operation. The Inspection was based on producers Nutrient Management
Plan dated April 8, 2003. Waste and Soil Analysis were viewed on-line and compared to records at the farm. Soil analysis dated
August 24, 2010, very little lime required. Copper and zinc are within guidelines. Waste analyses consist of four (4) separate
events with overlap on the 60 day window. All fees appear to be up to date. Calibration for 2010 @ 107 gpm was available next
calibration due 2012. Freeboard, rainfall and inventory were also reviewed at the time of this inspection. Sludge survey dated
April 7, 2010, LTZ is at 7.1 and Sludge levels are at 1.7. Next sludge survey due 2011.
Producer had previously purchased an additional 26 acres. Still clearing and not yet ready to be placed in the plan. No
applications of waste can be made until land is in plan.
Pit fan on nursery house #7 appeared to have a slight leak, Farm staff pulled the plug to drain pit into the lagoon. The fan and
housing were removed to determine where the leak was coming from. There was a sludge buildup at the housing. Farm staff
agreed to reduce the amount of recycled waste to fill the pit and avoid additional problems. Sand was put in place to prevent any
wash out of the drainage ditch before staff could put It back In the lagoon. Approximately 30 gallons of waste had accumulated
behind the house in the ditch. No waste left the site. No waste reached waters of the State.
Carcasses are buried; Producer is looking into a "biovater".
No the drains on farm.
page: 2

Permit: AWS350022 Owner -Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 02/24/11 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,800 1,785
Total Design Capacity: 1,800
Total SSLW: 939,600
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON 07/26/94 18.60 26.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 02/24/11 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Ne Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
❑
MCI
❑
than from a discharge?
Waste Collectlon Storage & Treatment
Yea
No Na_Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
❑ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑ 1-1
El
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility. Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 02/24/11 lnppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yea No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Y,9j No Na N
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number:
350022
Inspection Dale: 02/24/11 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Y_es No Na No
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑ ❑
❑
CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fall to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑
❑
and report those mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a
❑
❑ ❑
Cl
regional Air Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewAnspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
34. Are subsurface drains present on this farm?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Spray Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
page: 6

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
350022 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS350022
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine County:
Franklin Region:
Raleigh
Date of Visit:
04/07/2010 Entry Time: 12:00 am Exit Time: 12:00 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Owner EgIail:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Andrews Hunt Farms LLC
Phone:
252-991-4664
Malling Address:
PO Box 7038
Wilson NC 278957038
Physical Address:
299 Inscoe Rd
Castalia NC 27816
Facility Statue:
❑ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
36' 04' Longitude:
78' 06' 05"
56 Hway to Rick's Boone
to Inscoe Road
Question Areas:
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Robert C Hunt Operator Certification Number: 25249
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name R. C. Hunt Phone:
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Audit of records conducted between 2112110 to current date.
Signed waste plan for farm Is not on file. Waste plan that is on file (not signed) list tract #178 as leased or otherwise owned, A
current certified waste plan signed by "owner" complete with maps is needed,
Sludge survey extension granted on 9/20/06. Sludge survey due in 2009 was not completed or submitted by March 2010, as
required by extension.
This review was just to answer questions and concerns regarding the information needed to complete a proper Compliance
Inspection. Site visit was on 02112/2010. During the structure evaluation records were obtained. Freeboard records were
available up to 11/1512009. Freeboard records from 11/15/2009 to current date need to be submitted in order to complete a
proper evaluation. During this meeting Mr. Hunt had the Castalia records but did not have the complete freeboard information.
page: 1

Permit: AWS350022 Owner -Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/07/10 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON 07/26/94 1 &60
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
0
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
'transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
page: 2

M Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
13 Other Agency
Facility Number:
350022 Facility Status:
Active permit; AWS350022
Denied Access
Inspection Type:
Structure Evaluation
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Franklin Region:
Raleigh
Date of Visit:
02/12/2010 Entry Time: 11;30 am
Exit Time: 12:00 pm Incident #
201000800
Farm Name:
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia)
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Andrews Hunt Farms LLC
Phone:
252-991-4664
Mailing Address:
PO Box 7038
Wilson NC 278957038
Physical Address:
299 Inscoe Rd
Castalia NC 27816
Facility Status:
❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Questlon Areas:
■ Records and Documents Technical Assistance
Latitude: 36' 04' Longitude: 78' 06' 05"
Certified Operator: Robert C Hunt Operator Certification Number: 25249
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name R. C. Hunt Phone:
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Farm is in operation and has hogs on site.
Verified lagoon level
Collected 1 year of records to review
Overseed was seeded and lime applied
page: 1

Permit: AWS350022 Owner -Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 02/12/10 Inpsection Type: Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifiler Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON 07/26/94 18.60 18.00
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
page: 2

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 350022 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS350022 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Franklin _ Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 02/12/2010 Entry Time:11:30 AM Exit Time: j2:00 PM _ Incident #:
Farm Name: Andrews Hunt Farm (Castalia) Owner Email: rchunt5.sftnc.com
Owner: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Bgx 703{} Wilson NC 278957038
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant N Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown. LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°04'34" Longitude: 78°06'05"
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Questlon Areas:
Records and Documents Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Robert C Hunt Operator Certification Number: 25249
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name R. C. Hunt Phone:
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Farm is in operation and has hogs on site.
Verified lagoon level
Collected 1 year of records to review
Overseed was seeded and lime applied
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC
Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 02/12/2010 Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon LAGOON 7 07/26/94 18.60 18.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC
Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 02/12/2010 Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑ .
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ❑
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
Page: 3

'7 , 1
Division of Water Quality
F`. Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit
Compllance Inspection
0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
I Routine 0 Complaint
0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency
0 Other ElDenied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ; Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: atu► -d -R.J Q � � :( Ue� �- E{ikNVN feu Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phvsical Address: _
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
0
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone No. -
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
❑ Longitude: = o = t ❑ n
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Laver
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
E3Dairy
Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures: '
i
Discharges & Stream lml)acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
AI
❑ Yes) "0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes � No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes O<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes )2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes ;Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes .0—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes p3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) /
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes )Z'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes o
❑ NA
ElNE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
lack
❑ Yes KVN
❑ NA
ElNE
18. Is there a of properly operating waste application equipment?
ElYes
❑ NA
❑ NE
i
���� @ '� 3 '��& -
mmen�ts (refer tolque t an #) Explain$any YES answers and/or any&,recommendat � or any other comments
Use drawings°of facility to better explain siltuanons: (use addrttnnal pagesas necessary)PoLpWaf
:,
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name' ` �� Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signatu : Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: . — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes )Z"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
.,PNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual
Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l °
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ❑"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No
ElNA
❑NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
ElYes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes 0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes 0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
/dNo
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes o
All
❑ NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes [No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes o
[INA
ElNE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ZZ),
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
NE
MIT-3bi L-re L url r9-1 7 f9m tjj-(`,r6� 11

— 0b/29/2009 14:46 2522439687 TRACY GREENWALDT STA PAGE 01/02
ANOP,Ews HUNTFAKw, LLB.
POST OMC.E sox 9M
BAMEY, NORTH CAKOLINA 27807 OF
To; Tane Date: co on Oq Fax#:__CIlkC-
From.
FAr ..
Office Location: R.C. Hunt ❑ Tracy Greenwaldt
:.
P.O. Box 908
Bailey, N.C.27807 Instructive,
❑ URGENTI ❑ Personal/Confidential
[phone] Office
(252) 23"034 - Fax. ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Please Reply
$.I
�i: ' Ey For Your Review 1
r rrrn � cL
RE. �
NOTES/COMMENTS:
I
f
I
I
1 �
I ,
Cur,-, %, F004 tS Dower
Total # of pages including cover:
The informgflon contained in this tacslmlle message is fepally privileged and confidential Information. fl is intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity narn6G above. if you nave noenred this facsimile In error, please notify us Immediately by telephone (Wilson) and discard
the anginal message and any copies of if. Your prompt 000pemtion Is apDmcfated.

— -FORM 6tt7CW I _
- - --- -- — — Average Stocking and Morlality Record
T
Owratl Zrofl
'Date
mmkld
Previom Stocked
#
ai
Placement Socked
#
C3}
Stock S*ped
#
(4)
Morfaaty
d
ty7
"Total Stuck
#
isl
""Average Stock
#
rn
—*Average Mortality
Id'" 2OCA
184 Ly
0
At
a3
Fr_0
a
-7
Mav-
la
5
i'T "7
a
161
Iq 14
' Al a rrdnYrnim. Teoortls oust he kept nwnttdy. 3114J2003
"rota! Stocked (5): equals (1) + (2)- (3). (4)
Average Stocked (6l: Add previous 12 months of Total Stocked (5) and divide by P of erdries.
" Average Mortality (7): Add previous 12 menths Modality (4) and dWe by # of entries.

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
350022 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
06/11/2009 Entry Time: 10:10 am
Farm Name:
Andrews Hunt Farm (Castaiia)
g
Incident #
Owner Email: [e-mail]
Owner: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 7038 Wilson NC 278957038
Physical Address: 299 Inscoe Rd Castaiia NC 27816
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Active Permit: AWS350022 Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Franklin Re Ion: Raleigh
Exit Time: 11:30 am
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36° 04' Longitude: 78° 06' 05"
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert C Hunt Operator Certification Number: 25249
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(a): Name Title Phone
Phone
Primary Inspector: Jane Bernard Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
CALIBRATION DUE IN 2010 LAST WAS AT 107 GPM
519109 N=2.1 219109 N=2.2 1012109 N=1.6
DRAIN IN CORNER BY FARROWING HOUSE NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED AND PVC EXTENDED INTO LAGOON LIQUID LEVEL OR
HAVE A T£CK SPECIALIST SIGN OFF ON REPAIR- FILL IN EROSION SITE AS WELL. CLEAR UNDERBRUSH FOR A BETTER
VISUAL INSPECTION OF AREA
CAUTION ON LAGOON LEVELS- WHEN AT 19 PLEASE CALL WITHIN 24HRS 791-4200- TO MEET PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
SLUDGE SURVEY DUE THIS YEAR
page: 1

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Dale: 06/11/09 inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifler Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON 07/26194 is. TO
s.60
page: 2

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 06/11/09 inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
You No Na No
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
❑
❑
❑
than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yea
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
MED
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
MEI
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility : Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 06/11/09 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
N ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
013
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS35OD22 Owner -Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms L Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 06/11/09 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Otherlssues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report those mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a
regional Air Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review(nspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No Na N11
El
❑ ME] ❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No ,Na Ne
❑ M ❑ ❑
■ ■ ■
❑ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑M ❑ ❑
❑0❑❑
page: 5

Type of Visit,,40'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit -0-Rroutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
All
Date of) isit: EArrival Time: Departure Time: Y--I County:'Regio�
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
be_MrS -Xc er t 9 - S
Facility Con act: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = g = Longitude: = ° = 1
Design
Swine Capacity
Current Current =DosigNI, . Design
Population Wet Poultry Capacit y Population @attic Capacity
Current
Populatton
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La Non -Layer
❑Dai Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
DrIy Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Non -La Non -Layers
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Pullets
❑ Boars
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
LaTurkcy Poults
100ther
I
I
Other
umber of Structures:
❑ Other
Dischar¢es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
,
❑ Yes [ CJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes [ NO
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes 21'-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes �f/o
El NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes to
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
12128104
Continued

• Facility Number: Date of Inspection 9
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ YesoETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes j2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes .ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ,2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ,L/j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0'*No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
t4. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
2I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ON
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
DIN0
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date: a f rt 7JCJ %
12128104 Continued
Page 2 of 3

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I maps El Other
21.
ecord keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
aste Application [:]Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers El Annual
?Rainfall
Certification
❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1°
Rain Inspections ❑Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ��Nc
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes Aeo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes [ <)
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes 2`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes.,,2rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes 5 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes 4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
;tip Ef��
Additipnal,CoRnm �entsandloi,Drarvnngs a,,st��%)�" (Q;_ ; a �. t 3.� v1
., -...., Y -L . i
3 d
�a�/Vm�--L.[ o-�, luo
`
na,. l�_
c. o
c�z �
Eko,&k ju."
Page 3 of 3 12128104

3
4
xr"' "`:ar¢¢ :� i : E l iIi E€ � � � � � ,,•^ � f 4� E- IEf;r E.
> MSi 4 �F i3 33 3 3 ( F� @ E E €€ � E r�� •
ir
a s ftai v t wa z fiaav �f N
E
,.1E
'� a £ rP€ t
f
.,Q,� .-" a .;» £ - � E - � � •6 E I'll 3 f E' 1.
&
Y VIM S ^� j.i€1�$S,•-e 1 //�� FY W � � .�.
t
i '•
E E
pt
SA
\,X�
..a
V
' •. . .. E s E � �. a � � E b 'E { iF rE s', F ¢( � E F
yy E f 6 a 9
_ �vTl Rd! �.., •� E - Fi� % 3 € E i "rjj'; ��� 3 y i
say
m10b8 NAV7EQ'" ,T�rrr s f Liss .
Driving directions to Inscoe Rd
®3800 Barrett Dr
Raleigh, NC 27609
1. Head west on Barrett Dr toward Ili 348 ft
Haworth Dr
2. Turn right at Six Forks Rd ® 0.4 mi
3. Turn right onto the 1-440IInner ® 0.2 mi
Beltllne ramp
4. Merge onto 1-440 E ® 4.7 mi
5. Take exit 14 to merge onto ® 31.2 mi
US-264 E/US-64 E toward Rocky
Mount/Wilson
Continue to follow US-64 E
6. Take the NC-581 exit toward 0.4 mi
Bailey/Spring Hope
7. Turn left at NC-581IN NC-581 1.3 mi
8. Turn right at US-64-ALT 0.5 mi
9. Turn left at NC-581 3.2 mi
1 of 2 8/12/2008 7:20 AM

10. Turn right at Lancaster Store Rd 4.7 mi
11. Turn left at Rich Rd 0.7 mi
12. Turn right at Rommie Daniels 0.7 mi
Rd
13. Turn right at Inscoe Rd 1.0 mi
36.076100,-78.101400
Inscoe Rd
These directions are for planning purposes only. You may
find that construction projects. traffic, weather, or other
events may cause conditions to differ from the map results,
and you should plan your route accordingly. You must obey
call signs or notice.5 regarding your route.
Map d<airi (02008 NAV'rEQ ""
2 of 2 8/12/2008 7:20 AM

:�
. N
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 350022 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS350022 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Somolaijao Insipp ikion Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Other _ County: Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 09/10/2007 Entry Time:11:15 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Andrews Hunt Farm (Castaiia) Owner Email: rchunt a�sftnc.com
Owner: 6noLews Ijunt Farm LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 7038 Wilson NC 27895
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36"04'36" Longitude: 78°05'57"
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Question Areas:
0 Discharges & Stream Impacts Other Issues
Certified Operator: William C Green Operator Certification Number: 19271
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Cary Greene Phone:
24 hour contact name Cary Greene Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Site visit was conducted to collect GPS data to update farm coordinates in BIMS if necessary, and for creating new reliable location
maps in the future.
" Mr. Green was not available on site, but I informed him on phone about this visit and its intended purpose.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 09/1012007 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Other
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon LAGOON
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■ ❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■ ❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
M. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 2

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number �--� Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit V Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ?�) Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
I
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: A Dep tore Time: County: 4 Yl t h Re�gio�n:�� IZO
Farm Name: 2�f� c��rY,f Owner Email: 61C ��•�C�Y� �r
Owner Name: y�Q.�Q,r,ry�r pone: `
Mailing Address: 0 �j
- 0 i -e C
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: tPW' Title: d1G Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
-2
-66'ertifled Operator: 1 Operator Certification Number: __—�_�
Back-up Operator: � Back-up Certification Number: I Z
L�occaati,_oy n of Farm: Latitude: 0 0 =' =61 Longitude: = ° 0 t =«
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer W
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population'
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Daky Calf
❑ Dairy Hcifej
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes
El No
El NA
❑NE
❑ Yes
V1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
1�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: ti
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes IPNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes r No
❑ Yes IP No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes r No
❑ Yes YNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
11,
Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
§�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding [:1 Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or ] 0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drill ❑ Application Outside of Area
/
12.
Crop type(s) CeY2G1 (Ptv�nv.GINo,) ram( urnGn �ltif C1
��)
13.
Soil type(s) Y R-A 6"+ e'er"
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
P No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
TPNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
'pNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
fDNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
IoNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
ya ,M I u y
P
'm Q �- r a,ti i of P oruJ
j o
'� lY�t F `4 �: m, �dn
Gccy,^ �-e: �
�°`� e4✓ ,. �R.��-
Reviewer/Inspector Name p -e
Qry\
����11
t Phone: (_p3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: b7" I '20-a-3-
0
v 12/28104 Continued

34�r 22
Facility Number Date of Inspection*Oyr
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste 'Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes FlNo El NA El NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [PNE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 11,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes r!�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 1�gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes fp No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes Fallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 'E� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Com nts and/or Drawings:
37 ,ram. N7 C3y,`
QRY' ,r �,n7 rr o,f
V
of ktm
V'\ Ll
{ L' A'�" ;' 1 3 13
of vv-, L34 : rtC � As vo'�
8
hIF 5N Y\ 12128104 �f-'tg,5� `

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 350022 Facility Status: Act Permit: AWS350022 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection__ _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Franklin Region: Billeiah
Date of Visit: 07/19/2007 Entry Time:09:35 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Andrews Hunt Farm fCastalia) Owner Email: rchunt(&sftnc.com
Owner: Andrews Hunt Earms LLQ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 705§ Wilson NC 27895
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°04'36" Longitude: 78"05'57
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
�. Records and Documents
Certified Operator: William C Green
Secondary OtC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
© Other issues
Operator Certification Number: 19271
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Cary Greene Phone:
24 hour contact name Cary Greene Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility; Andrews Hunt Farms LLC Facility Number : 350022
Inspection Date: 07/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Soil sample report dated 3/14/07, metals and phosphorus levels ok. No lime needed this year.
Waste analysis:
519/07 = 2.2
2/2107 = 1.6
10/23/06 = 2.0
* Irrigation calibration completed last year. Needed again in 2 yrs from date of calibration.
* Producer in the process of applying for sludge survey exemption. Request and copies of survey results were given to me to be
forward to the Central Office on their behalf.
* Reviewed waste application records - Complete and balanced. Please be careful not to over apply - a couple of applications on Rye
were very close, and also stay within application window (10/1-3131).
` Lagoon freeboard levels and rainfall recorded with initials.
' Stocking and mortality records available, compiled weekly.
Crop yields for Rye & Fescue cut in May 2007 recorded in note book, Producer given CROP-1 form. First cut of Sorghum Sudan to
begin soon.
*** Please improve upon management of harvested/baled hay. The ones cut in May 2007 are still kept along the edges of the fields,
uncovered and losing their quality.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS360022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC Facility Number : 350022
Inspection Date: 07/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine -Farrow to Feeder 1,800 1,832
Total Design Capacity: 1,800
Total SSLW: 939.600
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon LAGOON 48.0[
Page: 3

Permit: AWS360022 Owner -Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC Facility Number : 350022
Inspection Date: 0711912007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts Yes No NA NE'
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other Cl
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 07/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ■
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Sorghum, Sudex
(Silage)
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Wedowee
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
001111
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 5

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 0711912007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes No NA NE
13
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
2& Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Yam
Nn NA
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms LLC Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 07/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately,
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

' of Water Quality
==Number - �L 0 Divisionon of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
`Type of Visit 11 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
iI Reason for Visit (DMoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
I
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 3 a Departure Time: County: QV"� Ll Region:
Farm Name: ' "'i v"T yv— �G , Owner Email:
Owner Name: V:e Cj i � � "� VYNf Phone: 25�--2r-- � O�
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:"' Integrator:
i�
Certified Operator: a `� O1''" e� Operator Certification Number: r �Z
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = f = Longitude: = ° ❑ 1
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
I
1
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder I
1
10 Non -Layer
I
1
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder ° El Layers
ElNon-Dairy
Farrow to Finish[I
❑ Non -Layers
Beef Stocker
El Beef Feeder
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars El Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turke s
Other ❑Turke Puults
Number of Structures:
❑ Other ❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes 1No
ElYes ff INo
Page I of 3 12128104
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Continued

Facility Number:7 — 2L Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Lic-y
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
No
7
ElNA
[INE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
r No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
..1
12. Crop type(s)o''a, A!I�Q
13. Soil type(s) V'j"4ee f
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
EpNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
EpNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
`p No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question tt): Explain any. YES answers and/or any recOmmendatio.ns or any othercomments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): u;
flo 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name I Safi — - - p\ rv\- - 1
Phone: Q Z 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Q��'
Date: cs
Page 2 of 12128104 Continued

Facility Dumber: — Z2_ Date of Inspection �!
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes '2�3-Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No [�PNA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [*No ElNA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ElYes I❑ No fNA ElNE
Other Issues I+
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes `� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately I
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional'Coraments and/or Drawings:
r 'p l�
gam. ser (Z�Q-\
Y\ C1L c� �` �� C�.� ✓ yy
C :tT �+ `mil
kro* \ r` r
J 1 " C'�G ✓� $ Yv� try �rA� �
P ge 3 of 3 Iri Q 2 c -) e- .

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 350022
Facility Status: Active Permit:
AWS350022 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Franklin
Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 10/23/2006
Entry Time:0&35 AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Andrews Hunt
Farm (Castalia)
Owner Email:
Owner: Andrews Hunt
Farms
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Upx 90§
Bailey NC
278070908
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant
❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 36°04'36"
Longitude: 78°05'57"
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe
Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: William C Green Operator Certification Number: 19271
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
On -site representative
Cary Greene
Phone:
24 hour contact name
Cary Greene
Phone:
Primary Inspector: ,Joseph Gyamfi
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms
Facility Number : 350022
Inspection Date: 10/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
' Irrigation calibration completed 9/20/06;
- Reel: 121.4GPM
- Solid set: 166.5 GPM (total for 12 sprinklers)
- Truck: 5825 gal/acre
WUP dated 4/08/2003
' CoC & Permit available on site
" Waste Analysis:
Waste sample sent to Raleigh for analysis
8/16/06 = 1.9
6/23106 = 2.7
1/19/06 = 0.85
" Soil sample dated 213/06, lime needed but have not been applied to fields.
" Lagoon Sludge survey completed 9/20/06; Sludge thickness = 1.84', LTZ = 6.55'
- May want to apply for exemption,
' Reviewed irrigation records on IRR1 & IRR2, & SLUR1 & SLUR2 - producer uses Reel, Solid set and a truck load spreader. Records
are complete and balanced with weather codes and inspection initials.
Lagoon levels and rainfall recorded. Changes in levels are consistent with pumping & rainfall events.
Stocking, mortality and crop yield records (Rye, Fescue and Sorghum) available.
" Records are well organized.
Need to remove baled hay from fields.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms
Inspection Date: 10/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 350022
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,800 1,807
Total Design Capacity: 1,800
Total SSLW: 939,600
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon LAGOON I I I 1 1 40.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 10/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms
Inspection Date: 10/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 350022
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%I10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Badey,.Oats)
Crop Type 3
Sorghum, Sudex
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wedowee
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
in ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms
Facility Number : 350022
.Inspection Date: 10/23/2006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit. Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fall to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
1__..__
Yon
Nn
N6 NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 00011
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: AW5350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms
Inspection Date: 10/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 350022
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional Air ❑
■ ❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
M
Page: 7

❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number, 350022 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS350 22 u Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Franklin Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 04/20/2006 Entry Tlme:11:45 AM Exit Time: 12:55 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: brews Hunt Farm (Castalial Owner Email:
Owner: Andrews Hunt Farms
11=33F •i'2S'*I•�'I:i�I:�
Mailing Address: PO Box 908 _ Bailey NC 27§070908
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
56 Hway to Rick's Boone to Inscoe Road
Latitude:36°04'36" Longitude:78°05'57"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: William C Green
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 19271
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Spencer Dean Phone:
On -site representative Cary Greene Phone:
Primary Inspector: John N Hunt Phone: [phone]
Ext.238
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Lime recommended per soils report No.18888 (under William Green-213106)
Irrigation calibration (permit condition 11,24.) and sludge survey (permit condition 111.19.) due by Oct. 1, 2006
Page: 1

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms Facility Number : 350022
Inspection Date: 04/20/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon LAGOON 4]00
--- j
Page: 2

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms Facility Number: 350022
Inspection Date: 04/20/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Rouline
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
.............. ....... ......_..............._........................... .......... .. P ............
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ m ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8, Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
. ., ., .,
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms
Inspection Date: 04/20/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number : 350022
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Sorghum, Sudex
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Wedowee
Soil Type 2
Sail Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑f ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms
Facility Number : 350022
Inspection Date: 04/20/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes NO
NA NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other lssues
...............................
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWS350022 Owner - Facility: Andrews Hunt Farms
Facility Number : 350022
Inspection Date: 04/20/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other• Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑
■ ❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
0011
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 6

IType of Visit ZCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit p4outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other © Denied Access
Date of Visit: % & , Time: $ S°
Facility Number s, '?�
— / Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
[�P'ermitted�Certiiied 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ........1\0.W'P-c..,t... r" `t �.:.'......... '.................................. County:.. ^1+;...d�?�i.............................................
OwnerName:........................................................................................................................... Phone No::tAw...../........5......� 7..`JF............
lr1}.. 8 .1,6
Mailing Address:..tfi.. Z Zi 13" — .� ........... ........................................................... s3 1.
Facility Contact:...................-•----..................................................... Title:................ Phone No:
...................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: a� ... Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number: ..... [`(Zb.`/.....................
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 1 66 Longitude a 4 44
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes ';11No
❑ Yes EM
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 35— 2Z Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [io
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ❑'�io
closure plan? J
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZINO
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes �W0
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes�o
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Q/No
11. is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
LD6
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified A i al Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes EfNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes —❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 0
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes VNO
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ;3190
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24' hours? ❑ Yes 5'f10
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes QJ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ;ff'No
Air Quality representative immediately.

Facility Number: 3S — Date of Inspection
Reauir•ed Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ;2r<o
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes O'So
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Waste pLpplication [] Fyeeboard ❑�VYz to Al
aljsis ❑ Soil Sampling f65y
24.
Is facilitynot in compliance with an a Aa z design? p y pp b e setback criteria in effect at the time of desi n.
❑Yes [7No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes �No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes 0 No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ,1allo
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ;2filo
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes -;3*1�0
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes ❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Farm [:]Crop Yield Form [:]Rainfall [:]Inspection After 1"Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103
ti

Type of Visit 40 Compliance Inspection t) Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit oRoutine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit- 403 Z `3 'rime: CI t 1 S
Nat U erational 0 Below Threshold
,0"Permitted Wcertified O Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 9 z: 14jf4 r _ County: t--9^ ^t -_� 1 j
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone No:
Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: 1Qe"Cr_42_ l)Ctk�i Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number: �/ Z•G9
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' ° 66 Longitude 0 1 «
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps'
Design Current Design Current ­`
Poultr y Capacity Population Cattle Ca aci _' Po ulation
❑ Layer ❑Dai
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ .,
Other
Total Design Capaeity
Total SSLW
ILJ Subsurface Drains Present IILJ Laeoon Area ILJ 5urav Field Area
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste ll t' n & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes PIN,
❑ Yes [INo
❑.Yes
No
❑ Yes
5�No
❑ Yes
PfNo
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: '3 — 2- Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
allo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4_6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
El Yes
PNo
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
�o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
�'No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Appligation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
12. Crop type `ems Ir-
/�3`No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
_0No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ZI No
Reaulred Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Gend YPermit or oth Pe it readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certifiel ni al �aste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WLiP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) V.8I i. 3 ❑ Yes O No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freel36ard, w"� ��pRxlysis I soil sample reports) ❑ Yes P111
0
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes /lN- 0
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? El Yes o
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes gNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes F'No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes A No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit,
s r
Comments (refer to question Z Explain any YES answersTandlor any recommendations or. any, other commenfs:,.,
�Fleld
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. ( e additional pages as necessary) ;: Covv ❑ Final Note
!_
1 � 7� �7
1 LC."k Ss-<p 9.CA V— \ S Q. St'1�� A A �T.1 G, ]r ?r.(-, C'A"•Tp.1�' _ scv,z �p
Q SEt P�•Or3S
P P�Pt�—-rt�4Y' Pot r� aauj_4 tvo M�c4Pp � tN VFW{
ter, 'air-; t-1'�F+f� �s .8.rr 5 s ,2�co•w m��fl�D
,.i-� � � ol!!�` a�Lc•
i eA
ro t A,&aQ r4 %
1.J�� ►�®E',d- �ti.s�� u�CL i�
+niJN►�c-?�.35 t..i€�.L.S r i3£. Sscl--�.4�w,sbR—. Ie�J� .1("-C-��S
Reviewer/Inspector Name' ' tA,:"S
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ w,� Date: f I Z f. o
05103101 % Continued

'2 7 /a
Type of Visit 6Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit jal�outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: WILo r I Time: Z- f
Facility Number Z
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
IrP-ernutted Z Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered ' Date Last Operated or Above T�h[reshold•
FarmName: ....... ........................I.......... ........................... County:...... r....M........................................... .......................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact:
.. Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress:.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ....... ,1j..... s,GF3- .1 Integrator:...f-rAt ?i!� .`4`!{'sJ... rr"� ........
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
s ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
3 ` Design `: Curren
e : Caoscity °Poiiuia4
Operator Certification Number : ................... .......................
Latitude A 66 Longitude • 6 «
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
I e0D
] 76�
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design �C1lrrepti I '� I II 13
ultry Catiactty: Popnlatinn �, Cattle
Ntmber,oiLagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray >iield Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps`, ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes eNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes J�No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Callo
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 1z_rNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes go
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ffNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes' 0
Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: ....................................
Freeboard (inches): 37-
5/00
Continued on back

•ti
n Fs�cillty Number: 3Date of Inspection L o
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [] Yes 0
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yq
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes IN
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes Ko
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 21do
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes P(o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 4Of4o
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes J:
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 314
Required Records & Documents yy�(
17. Fail to have Certificate of Cov ri3g & General Permit rjjeaa4�ily available?
[I Yes �+10
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Ceri!ifi Mnnimal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes , Io
//
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irr�ion, freebod d, waste an sis & soil sanjot"reports)
❑Yes 0
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ❑ N
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes �o
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ,B o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 10
0 IN4.*i0 Ati0i4s:or' dgfcjj6n�it rare �4 a R� { is'v�s�t; Yoh wits ee iy fl h r .
comes oridence about this Visit.
.i. H- ; 1 - . h '1 -!Z - - i 1 IY 1 � I, 11 i 1 r"IA1 {-.}W'3!.M'3 b EY•'- if 3 tf 1'ltt�• i I 'N `It"
Coimineats' (re%ir to question #).,, RExplain any YESranswersSaad/or any, recotuuutendatlons oryanyiather coument<i. • a.
J7 I 'C t,''V f 1 s p 1 k I P'FP w,,i tlt+t-iR i^ 3N } 13ie = fl .� 4 F s'�A
Use dzawrngs of facility totiettec:ezplain sltuatioris (use additional pages as necessary} `�
��
t
, {. .
lE<xc�PT`o1,1Ae L�/ Gag '[�r� Ju6 ce4a M-S Pee^I .
/.ice O f i��%�../ 744 r K JS"f' b`�� MXs.JA G �� CLaS�cy
Reviewer/Ins ector Name77
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: /J�\T .j , " Date: I JZ(, r of 1 5/00

Facility Number: -9 S— TE71 Date of Inspection 2 a
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes I;Y&o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Fe'No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes �o
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes�No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes o
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes <o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes P O
lAdditionall,Cornments and/or rawings:.,, rI < + , + .4
5/00

�Divisioxi of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation � x
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit 6complia a Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number hale of Visit:
ermitted ❑ Certified [] Conditionally JCertified ❑ Registered
FarmName: ..... �.. ........ X .............................................................
Owner Name: ( /& `'✓
.................................................... ........... ............... I...................
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:
MailingAddresss................................................................................
Onsite Representative: ................................................................................
Certified Operator:..:5y�/.[.P,F-.1/ .....
Location of Farm:
M7'ime: � Printed on: 7/21/2000
Not Operational O Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
County: .... .Y../r...L.�r......................................
PhoneNo: .......................................................................
Phone No:
................................................................................................... ..........................
....... Integrator:......................................................................................
Operator Certification Number:..........
AL
1.7
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry []Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �* �' r_�« Longitude �• �� 46
Design Current. Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacitv Population Poultry Caoacitv Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer Fl
Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Fa to Wean
arrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I I I ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ElYes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the cimveyance man-made? ❑ Yes o
b. If discharge is ohserved, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes o
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes
❑ Yes PO
❑ Yes
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes o
StrUCLure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure
Identifier: �/ rr....................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................
Freehoard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: 3j — Date of latspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
❑Yes
o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'?
❑ Yes
o
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
o
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
o
12. Crop type .4 J
13. Do the receiving crops differ 4th those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yeses
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ElYes
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
��00�_
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
[]Yes
a,�
Reouired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes 2-f
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
�
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes 0
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freehoard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes.AF6
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
❑ Yes
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes � NO
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit`?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes 0'110
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
❑ Yes .l�l"0
24. Does facility uire a follow-up visit by same agency'?
ElYes ""
25. Wer y additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
El Yes
Ri6.0)LAtioris oi- deficiencies *6re noted. during {;his: visit'. - Y60 Will-.eeeive lid further. .
:: ;corresp ondence.'about: thisvisit:::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::: :
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):

ft
Facitity Number: SY —z(]ate of luspectian T"i 7 Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge it/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
❑ Yes E; "
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes a
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes a
❑ Yes o
5/00

x-
Facility Number Date of Inspection 2 Yrl
-rime of Inspection U Z4 hr. (hh:mm)
['Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified [] Registered 10 Not Opera Date Last Operated .
Farm NameH!...........�t''............................................ County:.....i►.rl.................................................
.............................
Owner Name :........... -.... ..4 ft
^ — Phone No: 2S2 ......
Facility Contact: S 6-Kpr...... 4z..' .............. .............Title:.............. Phone No R grne
Mailing Address:
„r yo �o
........0.......... .�................3.................................................. ... W� ..........-........................:............ 9s-
Onsite Representative: Integrator; r'd A✓ Q 1
Certified Operator:......J�p�:a+ Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm:
A
............................................................................... .......................
Latitude ' 6 •1 Longitude • ° «
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ F ow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
[p
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Design Current ; Design Curr'ein
ltry' '-:Cauaciti-Ponulation Catale Capacity Poaulation
s U Layer
:
U llairy
❑Non -Layer'
❑ Non -Dairy
E
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
lE �, ` °,ail
Total sSLW
H.€;E
Nnmber 4Lagoons.
` ❑Subsurface Drams Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Sohd :,Traps 4 3' E _ ❑ No Li uid Waste Management System '
4 g
Discharges & Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance; man-made'?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .........3 Z
❑ Yes [►'No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes [2/No
❑ Yes
Ef No
❑ Yes
[B/No
❑ Yes
E?�o
❑ Yes S"No
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 1 2
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes (9/No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Uj�No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? [-]Yes G�No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? 1 ❑ Yes [B/No
Waste 1%pplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [(No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes E?110
12. Crop type — !" e- 13Ql'Mu Jc(. It y e- 0Wd'r*-j
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes IO2'No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 2/No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes 02rNo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes PTO
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes &/No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 2-fgo
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes RINo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes O'ND
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes [(No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ElYes WINO
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes YNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes E�No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes RrNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes EfNo
25. ere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes eNo
N,6 M61Midris;oi-• ilefcie'ncies -were n6ted dipring �. s.visit, • Y. WiiI >. .... e, no further.
. , .corresnoric#enee. abaut. this visit: :...... :
3/23/99

Facility Number: ` — 2'Z
Date of Inspection
Odor .lssues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
R/No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
5? No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
No
29.
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
is land intake located
Yes
the application spray system not near the liquid surface. of the lagoon?
❑
Ly`No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
Er/No
31.
32.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
Do Flush lack fill
❑ Yes
Yes
eNo
Wo
the tanks a submerged pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑
:Additional , ,Omme-ntS all. _ ors , rawi#95 � �,� � 9�� � . I3, I � � �3�� �� � s �;3d,
1I
32-. �1! �k: ld.;�s are �w err �es:yr✓_ f
3/23/99

`•.Wivision of Soil and Water'Conservalion - Operation Review
© Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
13 Division of Water Quality -'Compliance Inspection
1 Other Agency - Operation Review
10 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q hollow -up of DSNVC review Q Other �
,Facility
Number ��-1)at:c nF Inspvclion f �
Time. of Inspection OV 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not Open. Date Lest Operated:
Farrn Nafnc:..,�a.�tf.,0,00 S . &Aq... % � ]......................... uu .t'....................................
C' ntv:
Owner Name: pholle No:
Facility Contact : .............. .. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
MailingAddress:............................................................................ .............................................................................................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative r.... . N .. .... h 1. ,F-....................... �. .........
g..�..... ... r............. Lam-... �. ......D, 6� Into rator: tl Gn( r:'v.
Certified Operator:............. ..... Operator Certification Number: ............... .............................................................................................. ...........................
Location of harm:
Latitude Longitude ��«
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine _ Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to -Feeder ❑ Layer 7 1 ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
arrow to Feeder U ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains ['resent ❑ Lagonn Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharzes & Stream Im,Lacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)'? ❑ Yes �ZNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made" ❑ Yes No
1). If dischar,;c is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Wntcrs of the State ❑Yes /�No
c. tl' discharge is ohserved, what is the estiu3ated flow in gal/mIn"
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system ❑ Yes XNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes 0No
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes FYNo
1-Voste Collection & Treattrlent !!
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? El Yes 7No
St.ructurc I Structure 2 Structuc-:, 3. Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
FrccExr.3rd (inches): ..... ....................................................... •............................................................................................................................................
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Numl)er:7��— Date of Inspection
': Ate there any immediate threats to the inw rity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste managemenl or
closure plan'?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvetent?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
zx
❑ Yes /No
❑ Yes V(No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes �6o
Waste application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/iill provcill cnt? ❑ Yes KNo
1 ! . Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑Nitrogen ❑ Yes [:�No
12. Crop type AE�4 oA......IFq L.. ..... ......................... .........................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? El Yes VNo
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes 7No
Documents Required Records & Document
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard: waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
29: N.o.violations-or. deficiencies .were noted. daring .this, visit. - You w9l.retceive no further .:.: .
• : • aorrespgtidence: about : this :visit.: :: :: ::::: :::
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
❑ Yes Fz�o
[]Yes VNo
❑ Yes PINo
❑ Yes )ZNo
❑ YesXONo
❑ Yes X110
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes IWO
"`7/0 14 le 01, r ,�� O ✓i � �I� tr O F wt �VJ� ram, t'ii'� %
wl�-r w►4�H i,-y s Hni/�c c-s 3 fi `n4t5 Yc 41Z TO 6Jd,,V i�Lt S
crL-1,7 cr.v cr,e; �[ ri/�. 7`rs h�i9l�uN % I ti/ .46-`7
W f T H 'Fr X s i Al c t✓ n rN&-. - '?
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
L!
Date: - < <�
� �' 1/6/9�

t
OAtoutine O Complaint O Follow -tip of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number '� Date of Inspection
Tinre) of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
El Registered ©A Certified 0 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted [r Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:. / 1./1�. /� lrr„�5....9.u.U..T.... )ounty: .... �� NIG: ...,... ...............................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................. Phone No:
g S....................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Mailing Tess:
Integrator
................ Onsite Representative:.....�!�./.Us.�.............. ��1.�.!�„1..................................... 'g ...+��...�.J.�
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm:
C
C
Latitude '=4 46 Longitude 00 4 0L4
Design Current, Design Current. Design Current
Swune,�
Ca acit Po
p yi
ulatton
P Poultry Capacity Population Cattle,,Capac�tyPopulatton
f
❑WeaEto eder
;.' ❑Layer
f ❑ Dairy
❑ Feedinish
a; ❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean.
x#
Other
arrow to Feeder
^❑
�..
El Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity'
❑ Gilts
Boars
TotalSSLW
Number of Lagoons / Holdtng`Ponds
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
ElYes
�No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
10 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
�No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
Plfio
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
9No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
T10
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
Cl Yes
0 o
7/25/97
Continued`/on back

Facili*,,Number: —
y
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes &No
Structures La ons oldin Pond lush Pits etc
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1
Identifier:
...................................
Freeboard (ft): ...,. 1'(./.................
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste ADDiication
ElYes XI
o
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes VfNo
❑ Yes EfNo
❑ Yes V(No
❑ Yes 9&0
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 9Ao
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff a tering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.�r L.......-. .............. ...................... ...............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes [;Ki o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities -Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0-No.vio'lations'or deficiencies.were noted,during this.visit.- You"Mll recei�e•no�ftirther-
:-'.•c4rrespQndei�cealiou>r�this.visit:�:.��. �. �..• �.• ,• .•.. . :,....•:.. .: �. ' � .•::: �.' ','..•:., .�.�.
❑ Yes P No
Zes ❑ No
❑ Yes —PAO
❑ Yes C rNo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes QNo
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes 6No
❑ Yes C;KNo
1-6 '. '/fm a-" eF-.1b C ) icz-r-2 S
I, Ere, /11 o f r 7/25/97
I Reviewer/Inspector Name
I Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

Di of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency `, A ` `
g ivision of Water Quality
i
Routine O Complaint_ O Follow-ti 6f DW4' ins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Z
Date of inspection f
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered [3 Certified © Applied for Permit' Permitted
JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: 4.A2.1 ..... ..5 .
County:... .:7.": .!.........................
'........................................
'.
Owner Name C. . �a...................................................................
Phone No:...f 1...L...-.. 9� 4 '1- -j
Z..... ................. ............................
Facility Contact: ............................ Title:
..............................................
...... Phone No:
Mailing Address:oGv�
.....................�..............9............................s....�............
�'�/ 4........
Onsite Representative.........................................................e.
K
�
..................---...................
InteKrator::�.! ......�A/�--s....................
..... ........... .......................
Certified Operator,.. .�...! . .'Qr�....�� 1'....................................................
Operator Certification Number .........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
7 Desigri < Current IDesign Current y Design Current
Swing Capacity Poultry Capacity Population Cattle ; Capacity Popuia#ion,
,Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ' ❑Layer ID Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ; Nan -Dairy
❑
El Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder ID Other n
5 ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
-Total SSLW ,' 1 i
❑ Boarsk
,
W".
.. ...-. ..... i
x'. ...................... .-..-
Number f 'agoons Holding Ponds Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
3 y w ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
wk M'
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon' ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
41. Does any part of the Waste management system (other than lagoonstholding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25197 .
❑ Yes [2<01
❑ Yes ;� or
[]Yes No
❑ Yes���o
❑,Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ��N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
i
Continued on back

Fact sty l\ u mher: 7 — z _
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 'o
Structures (Lagoons,11oldin2 Fonds Flush Pits etc.
46 Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 2NO
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft):... L.. .....r..............................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes J2 1'
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? El Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes eNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes � 'o
r (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type 6�,52X--C .
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? Ycs ❑-No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes.
O
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
13"90
ET
4.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Q.
0
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21 es ❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
l�vo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23, Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
k'�""'
24,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
jJ No
25.
Were any additional problems -noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
0 No.vitilations or de'ficieneie's.were noted during this:visit.-:You4ill receive no further
correspondence about this, Visit'.,'
Comments ('refer to,questfon # Explain any Y S answers and/or anv recomEnendaltons arany other cotr>aments. � A
Use drawings of fae11 tti:better,explafti sttuatians {use add:ttbnaupages as.nec`ei5ai'v)
_ h .*,' N ytb }'+ . , .vC 1v VH+,}•+&*' } ♦.9<
L�3}f �.9 pry' c. o F..�nsr-e 04-J r-r c9i �A,, -
5-,9 y s • l" p5 v►- R,. F. { s• - f' r,9 S t-1 C 0" 1r• [ Q,
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: A/�_etZ7 r Date:

L a♦ L b I ;' ^(, *1_
Type of Visit Qrtompliance inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit &> Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Fi.lcilityNumbcr 3j
2 Date of Visit: 6 ti'' Time: a '- 3,-_)
�., Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted Wertitied [3Conditionally Certified D Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: �10 CAS T-A, County: �`6tArrt t_.i
Owner Name:
Malling Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: EArJ
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator: ANC'
Operator Certification Number: 19 Z
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle
❑ Horse Latitude a
& Du Longitude
0 ° u
Design
Current
Design Current
Design Current.
Swine ranarity
+ Pnnnintinn Poultry
ranarity Pnnidnfinn Cattle
ranarify '` Pnnnlatiiin
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
t B12 o
.0
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & tr m Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection 8& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillwav
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes p - -
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes ( No
❑ Yes N
El Yes VNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
Continued

40
A
Facility Number: S - 2Z Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
R�
11. is there evidence of over application? 1❑Excessive S nding [IPAN HydrAul c Oveerlmd j2t-r� a�S
12. Crop type L. _ZB�G 0� {� S-G - ���S, V,_ r T­ 4s?k4 6�L�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired RecQrds & Documgnn
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage& G l Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes 10
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes _el
❑ Yes ,"No
❑ Yes O'No
❑ Yes u No
Yes (o
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes j2rNo
❑ Yes o
El Yes No
❑ Yes .ENO
19.
Does the/facility fail to have all cc mponents of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
WOP, 2/-7 2•�
design,
❑ Yes
�/
E No
19.
(ie/ checklists, rreps, etc.)
,,// !,%%
1.7s arhple/re ortsv
Does improvement? irrigation, freeboard, &
❑Yes
❑
record keeping need (ie/ waste analysis so
No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
12'ko
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
eN
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
,LR'fio
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
,❑ No
25,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
113
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Final Notes
�
,�� S'ra� C� Cy '1�5✓r any�r1E.J`� i rJr r-esc-c,.l o�ca_ A
`-3(3aaA �R APP�,*cnr`a ,l
J Aff'-1 p GPa P �,1 „dam oJS� "�� rvvoR.G.. gFs�tnf� cit�L, TP-�arry.�� ,P�!•�
T&,T. 1 5 7
r 7i17- /a
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
05103101
lW 137 #� (�tic44 ` A F z �►��
Date:
,4
Continued

A
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes 'PINO
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes P40
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, El Yes O/No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 0 Yes —r-11NO
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) El Yes Q/No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriat6 cover? 0 Yes EJ'NO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? El Yes 2<o
AdditionaMom ents an or Drawings:,�_

Date of Inspection-p J
Facility Number 3 Z
Time of Inspection p D 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Ce ❑ Permitted / lot Inspection (includes travel and processing) 1 13 d
at Operational Date Last Operated: �P9xdcM z._.....rH...O..l.`........... 1%...........__............. _...................................
Farm Name: W(r4p. .. 1P!�L.....l..Ar/,w,tlLl.°........................................ County:... 9p^..f� I...!.................................................
Land Owner Name:......S L!!QF.O................................................................... Phone No:..... �...1._-.... J. ..-..2���� n�...........
Facility Conctact:...s 1� C✓.................... _.............. Title:
......................
Mailing Address: .Z�.j......G...l(.... ?............J.�.P ..
OnsiteRepresentative: kt...............................................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
. 4......-2....z�l....6............. _................
Integrator:.... ................. _.............................................
,
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude Longitude =' =' =«
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes Z N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ZNgr
❑ Yes
El Yes -No
❑ Yes o
Continued on back

Facility Number: ... .s......—..-..s....
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 5 c 6 1�^ - a'IS
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes �lO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Strugtttres (LLLaagooiis,gnd/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0'No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure.5 Structure 6
....�..... ... _...Y-. J..... ............................ ............................ ..............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes I�SNo�
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ;;No
<0
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? El Yes
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures Iack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
O<es
❑ No
Waste pplicatiyn
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type 171Y.._gs.sec ...........................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan {AWMPI)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
• 2-57ow
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
��'N00
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
l�No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑
Qlro
;�O�
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
Yes
For
22.
Certified Facilities Only
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments {refer to questioq # Explain any YES answers' and/or any, recommendations or any other darn nentts�-,�
Use drawings of facility to•better exp,' n situations _(use additional pages'as necessary)
Z/ 4 Ce-- /a-»-s -7 o ice, Ae Ni, e .5 �-
/�- 0 6W­r-
4
a
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, NC 27609
919/571-4700
File Access Record
SECTION
TIME/DATE
NAME
REPRESENTING:
Guidelines for Access: The staff of th : Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public records in our
custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the responsibility to the public to
safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program obligations. Please read carefully the following
guidelines befQre signing the form:
1. We prefer that you call at least a day in advance to schedule an appointment to review the files.
Appointments will be scheduled between 9:00 a,m. and 3:00 a.m. Viewing time ends at 5:00
p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view the files to the extent that time and
staff supervision is available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name. The number of files that you may
review'at one time will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits. Cost
per copy is 10 cents for ALL copies if you make more than 25 copies - there is no charge for
less than 25 copies; payment may be made by check, money order, or cash at the reception
desk. You can also be invoiced.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU FOUND THEM. Files may not be taken from the
office. To remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor
for which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $20.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
FACILITY NAME COUNTY
W � m `C ,
'I�I�YI�,IXl
,4 �09- - . L�-ql.c- / V�-Yqq
Signature an ame of Firm/Business Date
Please attach a business card to OW fa m
Time In
3 O]�--)
Time Out

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, XT?e
Health and Natural Resources Am,
Division of Water Quality
James B, Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary 1:3P_HNF;Z
A, Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Jeffery Wood APR
Wood Farm Partnership DtljR RAl
Rt 1, Box 207C Rtt;f .'iMt
arrcE
Castalia NC 27816
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
M ; ... Wood Farm Partnership
Facility Number 35--25
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Wood:
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
-7),�
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, N��y� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �� An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Telephone [phone]°6 recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper .

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A��
DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 27, 1997
Mr. Jeff Wood
2331 N.C. Hwy. 58
Castalia, North Carolina 27816
Subject:Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 35-25
Wood Farm Partnership
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Wood:
On June 13, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to
determine compliance with the State's animal waste nondischarge
rules.
The inspection determined that your animal operation was not
discharging wastewater into waters of the State and that the
waste lagoon had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of
the inspection the facility was found to be in compliance with the
State's animal nondischarge regulations.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind you
that you are required to have an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997. This plan must be Certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a
listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with your
waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Mr. Buster Towell at [phone].
cc: Franklin County Health
Ms. Kim York, Franklin
Conservation District
Ms, Margaret O'Keefe,
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
Sincerely,
�ct_x0 60-
Judy Garrett
Water Quality
Department
Soil and Water
DSWC --- RRO
Section Supervisor
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, owl FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N :� C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10°k post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Jeffery Wood
Wood Farm Partnership
Rt 1, Box 207C
Castalia NC 27816
Dear Jeffery Wood:
Awn% OPOM"%
�EHNR
JJ _ f�
July 11, 1997 I �-
7
ri Cif tICI
Subject:' Removal of Registration
Facility Number 35-25
Franklin County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of.15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your .
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is'deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan prior to stocking animals to that level.
Threshold numbers of animals which require certified animal waste management plans are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 11000
Poulg1with a liquid wastes tem 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
M.
cc: Raleigh Water QualityRegional"Office
Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Jeffery Wood
Wood Farm Partnership
Rt 1, Box 207C
Castalia NC 27816
e��
EDF=HNF;Z
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Wood Farm Partnership
Facility 1D#: 35-25
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Wood:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerel ,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, ���
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 f An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50%recycled/10% post -consumer paper

RRD P.02/02
15:26 FROM DEM WATER DUALITY SECTION TO
Site Requires Immediate Artenbar.- x
Facility No. _3� ZS_
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time:
Farm'Na
Mailing
County:
Integratc
On Site 1
Physical
'Type or uperation: Jwtne_ rouitry ,_ game
Design Capacity: / 5-C b Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Cerdfication Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 34�Z' �, Longitude: O 6 ' Elevation: 2 U meet
L 2-6 NjF Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have -sufficient.. freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 ,hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) 6sbffNo Actual Freeboard: Wit. "v .inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? 'e or No Was any erosion observed? es r
Is adequate land available for spray? es or No Is the cover crop adequate?or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?. 200 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? or No
e animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? or No
aribnal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line'? Yes or 6
?a animal waste discharged into waters of the state by roan -made ditch, flushing system, or other_
similar man-made devices? Yes or If Y s. Please Explaill.
ycs the facility inaintain adequate waste cnanagernent .records (volumes of riianure,-land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or&o
cc: Faciliry Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

State of North Carolina .
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental
August 1611, 1995
Mr. Jeff Wood
Route 1, Box 207c
Castalia, NC 27816
Dear Mr. Wood:
XF
, 0! XAA
AM.IfA
00^ ;1
EDEHNFi
Management
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Hog Operation
Highway 58
Franklin County
On July 24, 1995, Mr. Danny Smith from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Smith's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of the state.
Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
management deficiencies were observed:
-Your lagoon was seeping wastewater from the toe of the lagoon
slope.
-A significant number of ground hogs burrows were also
observed along the lagoon berm which may well be the cause of
the your seepage problems.
In addition to continued waste facility management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office
will require a written response to the aforementioned issues within
30 days of receipt of this letter. You should specifically address
how you plan to correct these problems and submit a schedule (with
dates) stating when these management deficiencies will be
corrected.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The' Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Wood
Page -2-
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed
permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste
management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by
a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For
a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with
your waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Danny Smith at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
/ds
H:\animdn6
cc: Franklin County Health Department
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation

0
I State of North Carolina
1 Department of Environment,
Al
Health and Natural Resources LT.
Raleigh Regional Office Amf
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor As
ID E H N IR
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Management
August 14, 1995
Mr, Jeff Wood
Route 1, Sox 207c
Castalia, NC 27816
Subject: Management Deficiency Notification
Hog Operation
Highway 58
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Wood:
On July 24, 1995, Mr. Danny Smith from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
facility. This inspection is a part of the Division's efforts to
determine potential problems associated with liquid waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Smith's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not discharging to the surface waters of -the state.
Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or. other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
However, as a result of the inspection, the following
management deficiencies were observed:
-Your lagoon was seeping wastewater from the toe of the lagoon
slope.
-A significant number of ground hogs burrows were also
observed along the lagoon berm which may well be the cause of
the your seepage problems.
In addition to continued waste facility management, these
deficiencies must be immediately addressed to help prevent the
possibility of an illegal discharge. The Raleigh Regional Office
will require a written response to the aforementioned issues within
30 days of receipt of this letter. You should specifically address
how you plan to correct these problems and submit a schedule (with
dates) stating when these management deficiencies will be
corrected.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facilities. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5M recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
•r

Mr. Wood
Page -2-
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$10,000 per day, and may also result in the loss of deemed
permitted status, requiring immediate submission of a waste
management plan.
This office would also like to take this opportunity to remind
you that you are required to have an approved animal waste
management plan by December 1997. This plan must be Certified by
a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For
a listing of certified technical specialists or assistance with
your waste management plan you should contact your local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Danny Smith at [phone].
Sincerely,
ennet Schuster, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
/ds
H:\animdn5
cc: Franklin County Health Department
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, Division of Soil and
Water Conservation
Central Office Files - WQ
RRO- File Copy

SEP 14
,
RAMGH REGlO'VR(_ C
September 11, 1995
Mr. Kenneth Schuster
Regional Supervisor
Division of Environmental Management
3800 Barrett Drive, 8te.101,
r,'�al.ei.gh„ NC 27609
Fe: Management Dei`iciency Notification dated August 14, L995
Hog Operation
1••I:ighway 58
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Schuster:
"In re:� ponce to your letter dated August 14, :199`� 1 am enclosing
'the response and schedule for- correcting thewastewa'ter seepage Trorrr
'the 'toe of our 'Lagoon sIope.
'The lagoon level was l(-.}wered over 50 percent in August: by
applying to coastal, Bermuda fields That correcterl the seepage.
I plan to build up the toe or the lagoon and fill ground hog
Burro's with dirt_ Z also plan to clean around the lagoon and plant
fescue. in October, 1995.
In thc- past we ran up to 1500 head continuously; however, as of
last fa.11 we have less than 230 head. There is significantly less
pressure on the lagoon now.
Sincerely,
Jeff Wood