350011_PERMIT FILE_20171231

-I_
1-+n-rt�- ��� 1 •.,.ry� ur�rL'E-1 , .
_..-.._._.-.�.�.-may
�--;---�_.._ • AL-
.
_
.. �.r rc.a`
W) `t'v� ?s MQ is (17- 1 �9 W-Q� i Pn 5kA� CS�e
- ---- -_

i
'
-
�
i /�
N y.. ._ 1
•. �
i � _ 1 � �
� � ' �
�
� •
��

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Kenneth Ellis
Peggy's Poultry
PO Box 173
Henderson NC 27536
Dear Kenneth Ellis:
i � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 24, 2000
Subject: Removal of Registration
Peggy's Poultry
Facility Number 3�5=1.Q
Frank) in, Gount�
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our
staff at [phone] ext 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, P.E.
cc: Raleigh Water Quality Regional Office
Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Division of Soil and Water Conservation -Operation Review .
�] Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection,
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
3 Other Agency - Operation Review
Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DNVQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSNVC review Q Other
-'Facility Number � Date of Inspeclion
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:rnm)
© Permitted © Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered nffNot Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: county: ................... ..........................................
OwnerName: ........ ........... Phone No:.....,...................................................... ...........................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone rNo..................... ...............................
klailing Address: ........................................... .......
.....
....•.................................................................... .•........................
Onsite Representative: .... ��-6..- ..................��" ..f!.. .............................Inte-rator:................. .....................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ......................•.........•............................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
♦€
......................•......•..........................................................................................•..---.........,......................................•..............•.......................................... '7
Latitude • �� 0 ` Longitude • o� 0°�
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischarsZes R Stream Impact~
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes [I0
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the convcyante roan -made'? ❑ Yes f No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin7 l
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters or the State other than from a discharge? El (� No
Waste Collection & 'Treatment /
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑'No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 /
Identifier:
Friichoard (inches): ............................................................
1 /6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number. Date of Inspection C 6
,,x°5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, Yes No
seepage, etc.) FFFF
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or �/
closure plan? ❑Yes giVo
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? /K, ❑ No
8. Does any pact of the waste nianagenent system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum — j
liquid level elevation markings? ❑Yes (_y�io
1Vaste ADDiiCatii]n
10. Are there any buffers that need tnaintenaitcelimprovcment'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Pondim, ❑ Nitrogen El Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type ................................................................................................................ ................................................ ........................................................ ... ......
.....
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coveraee & General Permit readily available?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc,)
19, Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation. freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
NA.Vi. .. . I1S. . i�ef. . . . 1. ..Were . . . . [�LLrlt'1 .rhls:v' , . You evil. .. . live n . t. .flier :. .
• : • cor:respoiideie e: iibbdt: this :visit.:: :::::: :: : : :: :: : :
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Con t t' r lect-n we- ( 1�e� t�s
�j,r�s to A- �V �Wt .
bl-z,10 5 opi
n
Reviewer/inspector Name ��/A_,
❑ Yes ❑ No
[]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu
7� Date:
1/6/9t

Facility Number" Date of Inspection // !
�`
Time of Inspection U J 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Registered El Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review _ 29to
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Nat Operational Date Last Operated: .....................................................................................................................................................
Farm Name:.... aCounty:.
............................... ........................ f.
q, �i9 z �- y zG?�
Land Owner Name:....:.:. .: �.--- / `--..,� .......... Phone NA .T
Facility Conctact:............5..:...
r � •r.....!....:..f. ............................... Title: ---•................ ................. Phone No:...---................................
Mailing Address:.....�t.U:......�?.Q..u....� 7. �.........`. 'L C � � 5..�'�'..............., .� t....... 7.� ...... �.............................. I ..........................
Onsite Representative: n y..ih 0.—................................................................................. Integrator:...��J. .?a.�l.a..�..{.......................
..........................
CertifiedOperator:......Q.:1.:.:...:...:..'......... ......................... .................. 4............ ...... Operator Certification Number: ......................... 4 ...............
Location of Farm: , 7 ! r? r i J
Latitude Longitude �• Da �
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
01"
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
0
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Ces
[:]No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ElSpray field Ej Other v ti j_c
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
3 0
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
,0- 0
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
��es
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
E Yes
❑ No
l
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
0`<0
�`
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
ElYes
0
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Cortlirrued
on bask

... .na"%-r i-•--rR:.rjs.�,�+,4;:d°,�Y "7StiSiY'.;:,trne-.. ,.,. - , _,rr, •.p'_ ,_.� .. . -. T , .._. - . i- -... _. ... try.
Facilitjlumber: 3
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect -at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (I.agoons and/or_Holdiny fonds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ,[f No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes El No
Structttt•e 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
............................ ..... ................................... ........ ........ I .................... ...
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
Y
O'No
21 Y/es
❑ No
12.
Do any of the structures need mainten ancelimprovement?
0' es
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
.❑'Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application'?
Q'Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15,
Crop type .�{ S;s.. 01 In / /I c r.r � r= 1.-e Sc1-e �._ Gc -$-ar -'J
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
nf'0 "a iI
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? S G �per_.
r
Q'Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement? r'
❑-Yes
[I No
19,
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑'Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
o
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
T, a IJr'�G.•
7 �!/ LI /1S l'1 •�
rv✓ r r r/ -
(..{!tj+qi�,L ��U-SGA�I���
l�r�G1i�d�-J%G
a -1 S.i e
f ' ! ,C' ] 4 rt [� r c.f n j CIO t,
� . l � %% /L �/0 A.-.
��
J c! u (" �j iT ci i •��
ij ✓� ! i�i✓ C�
s ^ i"� l � rL M to r 1Jf`� 11 C! .1 E� tlLr 6-Y, r. C�YiaivZr
el
�L V
a, Q
cc: uivrsion of water Vuattry, water Livattty 3ectro►t,-acruty Assessment unit 4/"/V �

*7�%
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality
August 18, 1998
Ms. Peggy Ellis
Peggys Poultry
P.O. Box 173
Henderson, North Carolina 27536
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Peggys Poultry
Facility # 35-11
Franklin County
Dear Ms. Ellis:
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
On July 28, 1998, Mr. Buster Towell of the Raleigh Regional office conducted an
annual inspection of your Poultry facility. The following deficiency was noted:
Record keeping for the land application of waste at this site needs improvement,
It was unclear to State inspectors where much of your lagoon liquid was applied
during the months of December 1997 through June 1998.
A site visit earlier in the year found that your gun carriage was located on the
back side of your lagoon dike and the gun nozzle was wired in a stationary
position so that the nozzle would not allow wastewater to be sprayed but in one
direction. No direct discharge of waste was noted during this inspection but
there appeared to be past runoff from this gun position.
Please respond in writing within fourteen days of your receipt of this Notice. You
should include with your response any records that you may have relating to
any waste application that took place during the above referenced times.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please call Mr. Buster Towell at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Kenneth Sc u r, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Franklin County Health Department
Ms. Kim York, Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, RRO-DSWC
DWQ Non -Discharge Compliance Group
3800 BARRETT DRIVE, sum 101, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROL INA 27009
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% PORT -CONSUMER PAPER

of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
of Water Quality
Facility Number �
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E3 Registered Certified �0J Applie/d for Permit 0 Permitted 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated;
FarrttName: Qr3f_(....../%_!.X../............................................................. County:..f `�^ l i h
Owner Name: ......<... ......tR../.�.: 5� ....................................................................Phone Phone No: IL Z.-.�/j3...-...Y....� 3 Y......................
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Onsite Represent
Certified OperaG
Title:
Phone No:
:._�../..�..%........<..? 3......"`.efo........��'..........qq3............................................. ..........................
:.... .�1�.�. G l�! ! ....................... Integrator:.f±.�?
s......................................................... Operator Certification Number ...........................................
Location of Farm: c13 j
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 0•=' ='< Longitude =• =' =11
Wean to Feeder U La
Feeder to Finish on -Layer z'
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder A ❑ Other
..
Farrow to Finish
Subsurface Drains Present Ili] Lagoon Area JU Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ;No /
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes IGNo
❑ Yes w 1O
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N
/t
❑ Yes No

lie
F! #i ity Number: i3s— 1 r
S. ''Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.fiolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): .q..! Q
........... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? a,4 Alt VA/ ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff/entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) /
15. Crop type-19�9
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? SG 4" C'O''0-- "'WW ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? C r {r
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does Facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No.via'Wions,oc d6rcienc'ie's. were noted during this.'visit.:You:w'ill recei've,no-ftirtliee
.•cUrrespoi>Idebct�ab:out�tbis:visit:-' '�, .�:�.�'�. ; .�.�:.•'�:��-:�'.�...-. .:. ' �:::�::;
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �`+o
❑ YesO
es ❑ No
❑ Yes I�No
❑ Yes o
es ❑ No
ri 0 &al"4 X OF n y 1 Y r f ( /�•. �i'►�(j+�i-►✓ v/" p � 4 G !�✓ Y� /i P.Yr - 0 d it r P��L /
Jk, k�.C. j q ' k f . +.� J✓ �°l + 1-t 4 -v J-o y {y E%id . II ►ECG w ��- h r L a f
Q4 f 7'�'� � S iCliv-e..arv� Q /%¢� FL -A- `Z-' 1 9D Jj. J f 'Vn J V. r L'Ces
Wi f (l".A c 1V,O.D .
7I25/97

itine 0 Com laint 0 Follow-up of D%VQ i
Facility Number _.—
Registered [3 Certified 0 Applied for Permit © Permitted
Farm Name......... ..........
OwnerName: ................................................... ...............................................
ollow-up of DS`VC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
10 Not O erational Date Last Operated;,,,,,,,,,,,,
County:....... r ...... .........................................
.. Phone No:
FacilityContact: ... Title: ................................................................ PhoneNo:...................................................
MailingAddress:.................................................................................................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: ........ ....EG&..`.{................ ............................... ..,:. Integrator:.................. ..................
CertifiedOperator;............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number;........................ .................
Location of Farm:
Latitude E__10 0' " Longitude =• =, =«
�' �1 a `� Designs Currents ,3� , DestgnCurrent ^, Des gn Current
Sw Capa" Population °Poultry., ;CapacttiY„Population, Cattle � gCapacity Populat an
n..H..
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
�< [] Feeder to Finish on -Layer ❑Non Daury
❑ Farrow tWean
- ','
El Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other A
Jr a a
El Farrow to Finish 5 Y TbtalDeStgn CapaCtty
❑ Gilts g ,t ■<x�
Boars
xxr+ Tt)i�[ SSL TF
�Numberof Lagoons 1 Hotdtng Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
r
t_. .. ... rK y.
s 4 ' ❑ No Liquid
Management System �
:
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flaw in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ No.
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
0 No

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be property closed?
Structures (La2oons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): .....;....�� ...
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ❑ No
es No
Structure 5 Structure C
❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need main tenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, r runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.....................................................................
y..................................................................
l
15. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0, No. viol kions or' deficiencies. were noted during this:visit.- Yoti:will- receive no�ftirther- : -
cvrres'pondeince about this:visit.:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
/Wo
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
C+<w- 3•.e<,jsa { 4- +�MXR 3R;D "i-�y5.'%„+a
ents.
Comments (refer tv question #) „ Exptarnhany YES ansK ors and/or any vc©immendations orkany other Zimi�Mii.
Us:rawi gsto�f facility tattterxpltuah�uns (nsead�ditonal pagsasecess�tyj`51 ^'
13.gt
Ca M C.: C F d F �° d'r�llfi�l �t�X . r/s 7`
A.
r ? Go m--Nm cs � p6qw. n Tp s y�
i'U �11,0 (,fps D F G� rU 0 W (r L r4 N
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name {, . gw €�,''^w ", r {
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: "763
V 1

9
ih
Stine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection
Facility Number
© Registered [3 Certified 0 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted
Farm Name:..... ` Lc��`G''t (� Po�►,.1�.. ...
OwnerName: ................................................... .........................................................
Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection .0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
County; ...... .........................................
.............. Phone No: q��......................'>
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: ...................................................................................................... .............. ..................................................................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative:....... 8a.kf.............. /.................................... Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number;.................... .....................
Location of Farm:
Mlliii
ii
c
c
Latitude • �� r_ L{ Longitude 4 46
LI Wean to Feeder LJ Layer = U Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish Non -Layer 3 ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to We x
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish , Tt}tal TiubfpuCapacity
❑ Gilts
❑soars Total SSLW,`<
f,
Nut�tther of Lagoons / Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management Systemz
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes 9fNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes Q�No
r
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon ❑ Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes RfNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes Piqo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes VNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes )ZNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes 0
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes PrNo
Structures (Laeoons.Holding Ponds Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 12ryes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ... _! ................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ...j./...)..Ja................................................ ................................... ............. I ...................... .................... ,............... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes V(No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E(No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type lT .lam ......1 3'
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Q1►ly
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0- No.violations-or deficiencies. were noted during this.visit., You.will receive�noltiriher• .
:�.•corresportdenceaboui�this:visit.�:�� :�.... :.:..:............' ..' :._::�; :�:
❑ Yes l21
N0
El Yes JNo
❑ Yes pr�o
....................................
�❑QYees L140
_% �?s E!rNo
❑ Yes O�to
9Yes ❑ No
/ETYes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes 2fNo
❑ Yes dNo
*s ,fl�10
❑Yes (LJ No
l �1. wry s p� ANN(y 'TU vsE 44'&Y W�.0 ON La5T s,4-4C- r3 yr plr,'
/,Vl I ��(/'V &_ 1 -4 M _1y U
Ic
PAP Oyt A-s
I d"� - k1,�-i-. ttG'c-#vc4 IKXY - 3 0 0 s 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector SignatureP'// ( UA--fi"GL4.CJ V X1.1J -1-/ Date:

3SVVC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
[] DNN'Q Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
outine. O ComPlaint O Follow-u t of MV l inspection O Follow-up of DS1%`C revie%v O Other
fate of Inspection G7
a
Facility Number yp`^> �mJg_=
,if' ltrsltectinn � 24 hr. (hh:ntnt)
Farm Status: Registered [3 Applied for Permit
0 Certified Permitted
w-
Total Time (in fracttou ot'hours
+eN-:l .'_= For I ltr I -� min)) Slymt on R t icw
or Inspection i,includes travel and processing;)
Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ..............................................................................................
Farm Name:....` t::,- '.ro i...J a�Ci"v .- F �� -"1 ................................ C4,ulit �: , lllll %l .%. f................... .... ...................
Owner Name: ........ A;�.t..............'1
...-�..r..1....�ti............................ Phone\o:....7.•p,.......,�L................,.........,.,...
Facility Coutact: ... ,.�� ................ r..,....... `rittv:................................................................ Phone No:......... .....
�tailiug .Iddt ess:................................................................................................................................................................ ..........................
Onsite Rep resentatiye:...,.. G" Integrator: ................
CertifiedOperator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude �" �: LJ:: Longitude. �• l_JL Q:L
Type of Operation
Swine'.
Design I Current,'Design Current -Design . Current
Capacity Population- Poultry Capacity: Population Cattle Capacity. Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
[--]..Other
Number`of Lagdons / Holding Ponds ���� /}�^^�J�� ' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag;onn Area ElSpra► Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharF+e observed from any part of the operation?
1]ischarge originated at: [I Lagoon ❑ Spray Field El Other
a. €f discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, slid it reach Sctrface `'eater:' (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. ff discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in cal/min?
cl. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system` (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
e.s 214N o
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes /� No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 6 No
❑ Yes VJ No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes PNo
Continued on back

Facility Number-.3 j
6. Is facilhy not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures Lagoons and/or Holding fonds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure ? Stnicture 3 Structure 4
...........................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify D«'Q)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
❑ Yes �NO
❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑'Yes No
"11
Structure 5 Structure 6
.......................................11.....................
❑ Yes [301Vo
❑ Yes ZNo
Yes ❑ No
"IzYes ❑ No
❑ Yes P"N'o
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
P�No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ONo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
,Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
[2`�0
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
Yes
El1
�l No
For Certified Facilities Onl
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ElYes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
-7, 'TVOL T� T3.I 7tf-ufl-6 04y .- &-14tc,tt.6r-E
1 '�.. V � �- ��`>�TGD.�ci /l✓ � 5-�'ZL�rI r � J E^ - �fj-.5 � L �`�'/, -7-� � � �nl �}
J to ! S4_ L,,) L, i A) P ; 4C LSs d i'-� p U� hG /01,V 6— tv (JI'Q
�� 57W13 �Lr-.5 rtl U G � rlti.[J O/V PoIX F A4-9-05 0A) �-- P-G-ovk d- 0&7w&-_.,N
Reviewerllnspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
14 Qvs L--t, . NI�5 s E-E-DE-D .L6-V,vC5 rc() r/(/,v s
RgL-� 4,vD GOVLI-9��`s i72 � '�'a+�Ic t�v T`?�-16-YZ49 5
I'3 . -1vl af-7.,LCt2-S ,V E ,"7c /3 c !Ov -r- t /V P P IA( T-23 Ski/.lur?-IZ y /�79

a
State of,North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Ms. Peggy Ellis
P.O. Box 173
Henderson, North
Dear Ms. Ellis:
&.4
X��
[:)aHNF;Z
Division of Water Quality
June 27, 1997
Carolina 27536
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Peggy's Poultry
Facility # 35-11
Franklin County
On June 13, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional
Office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal
operation. This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to
determine compliance with the State's Animal Waste Management
Regulations.
Mr. Towell's site visit determined that wastewater from your
facility was not actively discharging to the surface waters of the
State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other .prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed. However, as a result of the inspection, the following
deficiency was observed:
A discharge of wastewater was observed from a leak in the floor
of a confinement house. This waste flowed at a rate.of less than
1/2 gallon per minute towards the adjacent swamp. This wastestream
did not reach surface waters during the site inspection.
One side of your waste lagoon was badly eroded. This should be
corrected as soon as possible to prevent further structural damage
from occurring.
The current land application area being utilized consists of a
small field less than an acre in size. Arrangements should be made
to gain additional acreage for the purpose of land application.
This will prevent over application and \or possible illegal
discharges of wastewater from occurring.
The above matters should be addressed to prevent the possibility of
an illegal discharge. Please respond to this Notice within 30 days
of receipt. You should include in your response the actions that
you will take to address these deficiencies.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, � FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%q IW C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 500% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Ms. Peggy Ellis
Page 2
This office would like to remind you that you are required to
submit an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997, or you may choose to submit a closure plan for this facility.
These plans must be Certified by a Designated Technical Specialist
or a licensed Professional Engineer. For a listing of certified
technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan
you should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions regarding this inspection please
call Buster Towell at [phone].
{� Sincer
2nZth7Schus`ter, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Franklin County Health Department
Ms. Kim York, Franklin Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC--RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
NOD\35-11

Facility Number Date of Inspection / - 66
Time of Inspection ja 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: egistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:.f.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review p
Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and nracmdno)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ....................................................................................................................
i
Farm Name:.....£ J9� �1.... ;E..46 Gcl%f Coun F�n�
Land Owner Name:... �r rj..4�1 «�fs 9 i 9 — �9z —( gr6 9 _............................................................................ Phone No:..................................................................................
Facility Conctact:........ f h........... _. ................... Title:.... . Phone No: .e
_............. _. ...._.......
Mailing Address:./i9'.._q_:SEx (`%j ` z+c .z?t .V/ C . Sj>!
Onsite Representative: /;.,-n!.K� t,1.?�.v,,, .... p/2Jn-e-- ..................... Integrator:.... �!9S -�
/J....._..............................................
Certified Operator:.....! �T. Jy..l:.s..............._......................._........_............ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: 1 n l n F S
Latitude Da0`=<` Longitude =0='=«
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field Other /=/qar lM/Ct ,'.n �fngSe.
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? G z gPnr
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
[]Yes
Emo
Q-< ❑ No
❑ Yes �0 I�
❑ Yes 'Na
es ❑ No
es ❑ No
;[]Yes o
es ❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: 35....—...,�..,.
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
0
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
.1 -N' O
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
� O
Structures fl,a a Holdilig Poadjj
0<0
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
.cf►.. �..Q..../ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................
.........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
...
o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Ules
❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®'No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
/Yes/"["3
No
Waste
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
es
❑ No
(If in excess o WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type z..... . . y................. .`,ir�J...................................f V �v„„�.�`..
16,
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (QWMI')?
❑ Yes
❑ No
tYo i
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for [and application? SCG
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
es
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 5'eG-
❑ Yes
[--]No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
es
[I No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? (r.�// CAP// '
❑ Yes 2No
For
t1 iSC4 r.r r—in c4403s
CC[dfled Facilities Only I
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[qorrimewfitis (refer to question #) ., Ezplam;any YES answers'and/or'any recommendations or any other comments � a
ri
Use gs;of facility to better explain situations' (use additional pages as necessary) a
•t"%�< - .. ��w ai..� ..:tV'.� o. ... ....., ., • .. a� .�'. ..• � ...-� o-,.,: �7 �, „c ..-.x r. `. ,. .. r ,>, r �'_'�'�eZ. xv=' ., ...
nil Afr�* , n cfl, G,':, ti. ¢�. �► 0 S c /=rvo r �G Gran. � 1H l�� �,, . � fi ro c a..� v.�,dh Fes// .qn d 9'
-`t-� ✓�i�1 r,�. ,•.,� � � y. sd,.-�=vc e: �srt�.•�
t/h 49 s • e- o ►- /"4 jvp d-1 ibe � 1/ ,'s 619 c� / y e -ry 4z/ A3 y► 4-Le-e- is, e—v"14- C 4
O L`} r vu- d qC f}, 4�, QG*-w-y c� 34.4i'raN *-,y y,,n 4or,st�,,�x;,-1 �• u, -� -I
j�(,rC. P11= lihf < 9r9fT J ^ e►� el�r� �y,p,•,+}�yy/�'�i�� fin► des✓,.,� ` ale% r
MS L/!,3 �rc� G`��h1G/,� 0�s�• tii'J-t�< r w c✓�,G�a��� 44,2� jHS�� e_
Reviewer/Inspector Name "'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G Date:y "77
—t=
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Facility Number S
Farm Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
of DSWC
Date of Inspection I b//3�971
Time of Inspection E2� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection !includes travel and nroeecsinal
Farm Name: ....�iw.SJ,S�......'....1.......':.!3>2h.,..........����`fS._P�."�i'I County:..r�QQ.�l.^._(G.�!..h_.............................................
L / ....................... Phone No:7j1.1...' 'i..2 ^ y 2t: .....................
Land Owner Name:::.._.Q:JS...`.f. . �.................._........ _..........
Facility Conctact: ...... a3s.`.f.....L../..1..... f .............................1. Title: .... lty,,,' ..................... Phone
yNo: .... __..................................................
Mailing
tiateRepresntaHVt.%I,lA.er....,7........./C!,ES`............._...�?/ eto,75.sJ...h..G................................................
�J� i I.........u...........1.._....__.....................................,
Certified Operator:... n45;,S._�... ....... ............ _.................................. _........... . Operator Certification Number: ..................................... _..
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0.0,0„
Longitude = 0=1 ={,
.General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field 0 Other f p_/ Ir-1 1 t o h ye
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes �d No
O'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 N/o
❑ Yes 01 o
01 es ❑ No
Zl'Yes ��❑ No
❑ Yes � /
[]Yes
Continued on back

Facility Number: 3J --
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures f La oons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft), Structure 1 Structure 2 Stricture 3 Structure 4
..,................ ..................................................... ............... .......... .......................................
' .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type 4SS 4 q.. .............. G~,Go►.. ++^- l
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes eNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
t8. Does the receiving crop need improvement? �t I
19. 'Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Wasie Management Plan readily available?
23, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
............................................................
❑ Yes 0<0
Yes ❑ No
es ❑ No
es ❑ No
es ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
es O No
es ❑ No
O<es ❑ No
��es ❑ No
❑ Yes L No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
+�J/rig-+ i) ..50_4% 9, f /�C�
l �jcp-� �r n Q�irtyi—I ,'lD ✓✓ A `? r% S f G f �Y �$u1. / n rt.0 r. f CIO W +�, 4 — 4- y p�.
1
L
,9 ' s �- /�`-I �¢ b.a dJf•��
f h-8.�� fin., f� ►j d i u ca.-!t► r
A t 8-✓l�,c.. GjL�. � r �e��,��( !n ��/G%�� t}r. jJc y c w� � �v1e�%
bv✓a d `" �
cc: Division rj water Quality, Water Quality J'ectiou, Facility Assessment Und 4/3U/9 /

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Joe Suggggs
Rt. 1 Box TS3
Whitakers, NC 27891
e��
1D[HHNFZ
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
May 14, 1997
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summary and Corrective Action Recommendation for
Joe Suggs Farm
Facility No. 33-11
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Suggs,
On May 6, an Operation Review was conducted of the Joe Suggs Farm, facility no. 33-11. This Review,
undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OD, was one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was being discharged to the waters of the State, and
the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal were properly maintained and operated
under the responsible charge of a certified operator. A copy of the completed review form is enclosed for your
information. The following item was discovered and noted for corrective action or response:
The waste utilization plan needs to be amended to account for the switch in fields that are being
applied on. Since the switch increased the acreage in the plan the amendment should be easily
accomplished by notifying your technical specialist.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
"'61�A
Marga t O'Keefe
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Edgecombe Soil and Water Conservation District
Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
John College, Hanor Farms
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, !' FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N%q4FC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% past -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ` •
James B. B. Governor EDIEHNF;Z
Jonathan Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
December 5, 1996
Kenneth Ellis
Peggy's Poultry
PO Box 173
Henderson NC 27536
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Peggy's Poultry
Facility ID #: 35-11
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Ellis:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30.000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919r133-0026.
Sincerely,
FOgieve W. Ted
z4sf�
Enclosures
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System W �� Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission N'Wf CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 + I�. - , - r-50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources LTI.9;TA
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary [D E H N
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
August 5, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Kenneth Ellis
Peggy's Poultry
P.O. Box 173
Henderson, NC 27536
Subject: Notice of Violation # 96-037
Notice of Intent to Revoke Deemed Permit
Facility Number 35-011
,Franklin-County---�
Dear Mr. Ellis:
You are hereby notified that, having been deemed permitted to have a nondischarge permit for the
subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 211.0217, you have been found to
be in violation of your 211.0217 Permit.
On July 24, 1995, Danny Smith from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance
inspection at the above referenced facility. Upon inspection it was determined that you had
inadequate levels of freeboard. In addition, a re -inspection on March 29, 1996, by Mr. Charles
Alvarez noted that you had no available freeboard and that your facility was discharging
wastewater.
In accordance with the requirements of NCAC 2H .0213, you are hereby given notice that sixty
(60) days following your receipt of this letter, the Division of Environmental Management intends
to revoke your permit unless the following conditions are completed:
1. Immediately eliminate the discharge of wastewater or correct the violation.
2. Make any modifications needed to ensure there will be no future discharges.
3. Submit an approved animal waste management plan and have the attached certification form
completed. One copy of the plan must be sent to your local Soil and Water Conservation
District. The certification form and two (2) copies of your plan must be returned to the address
below:
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section Operations Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Failure to comply with the above conditions will result in permit revocation and therefore, the
existing animal waste management system serving your animal operation will be in operation
without a permit as required by North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
Your approved animal waste management plan must explain how you will collect, store, treat and
land apply your animal waste in an environmentally acceptable manner. To assist you in the
development of this plan and to provide the required certification that the plan is acceptable, you
should contact your local agricultural agencies such as the Soil and Water Conservation District,
the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, the North Carolina Cooperative Extension
Service or a technical specialist designated pursuant to the rules adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
If we have not received the requested animal waste management plan and certification within 60
days of receipt of this letter or if there are additional discharges to the surface water a civil penalty
of up to $10,000 may be assessed and you may be required to apply for an individual
nondischarge permit from the Division. This permit, if issued, will contain monitoring and
reporting requirements determined to be necessary by the Division.
Although we will make every effort to work with you in correcting the problems found at your
facility, please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as preventing the Division from
taking appropriate enforcement actions for either these violations or other past or future violations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either Judy
Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor for our Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] or
Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone], ext. 581.
Sincerely,
r
M A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: (Regional -Water -Quality -Supervisor
Franklin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Steve Bennett - Regional Coordinator, NC DSWC--Raleigh
GCompliancelEnforcement File
Donna Moffit - Division of Soil and Water

7.5 Ml{
5356 1 SW
752 (AFTON, 153 154 10, '55 2 250 000 FEET I 156
1 T
Q)
f � � WARREN
\LZrrI /�� �r��FRA(rN,-KLLIT
-rco
`�/111�11{ram
I
Cem
I �
� I
' L � ��� :'� �� $ l� �r ice\ ,`•.,
300
�wN �t
'it
350
Guptan a3e W� 'A �� ? � I✓
' 00'"i/
i�01

Facility Number: 3S
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date: 2q q k
�.,
Y
Time: 11 0
' General Information:
Farm Name: Ike a's POLO
s/
- County:
!
�!� �:..•
Owner Name: ICQ xe�±t ,� �i
r3 - ' —
Phone No:
z. y7-6
:.
On Site'Representative: a
,
's Integrator:
kV iling Address:
_ HeJerSe_
nrC _ z
Physical Address/Location:_ 13
M: tje f _• LaW �sb4 r`f-.
r f a•0 A k,-
IL ,RA f�r�
_ �t� eu J}le.�-
Go�s•A�•� �Q�l. ,._. b���
1�f�....._aw1
,,.
l2ay _�
Latitude: 3 � _./
1 M Longitude: 71
Operation Description: (based Qn design characteristics)
Type of Swine No. of Animd1s Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ sow - Qk Layer��_ ❑ Dairy
❑ Nursery ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Feeder,.
OtherType of Livestock Number of Animals: '
Number of Lagoons: I (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection:
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than •1 foot + 25 year 24 hour-stoirm storage?: Yes er No ❑
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ No
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑ No
Is any discharge observed? 'Yes R( No ❑
❑ Man-made fV Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes No ❑
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑ No ❑
( list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type: Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application? Yes ❑ No 12/
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application? Yes .❑ No lR
Is animal waste stockpiled within.100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No
Is animal waste Iand applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No G-
A01 -- January 17,1996
I

i Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes 6a/ No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes �R( No ❑
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ Nf�.
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan -on site? Yes ❑ No ❑
Explain any Yes answers: W • s
-L - - L ,_ __ . - -, ,-. L
U S ,GS tA a ve1_ vela -v .cr : d�rri►t,/�.✓t y J'lrtq/.•� . Grea-irr �'�ie�./
2_SPP f /P Ne ftd- / rru � -- —J_tc � /V [n.J fo Q LV' q re.
E
cc. Facility Assessment Unit
Drawings or
n
Date:
Use Attachments if Needed
l."N4L
AOI — January 17,1996
i

f
Farrb-Na
RRO
P. 02/02
1526, EH WATER QUAL I TY SECT I ON TO
':
y.
TZ. Requires Imm -te do 6ffiate.A n n-
OF EZIMROi4NIEr�t MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS S1`1t VISITATION RECORD
DATE. ­(,xk, 144
A
i41E
e,
'.Mailing Address:
County
14!`
Integrator
7'
."
"fPh6`'
A
5 4
"-,
ite Representkiy'%
On�-�.
-l"-
"Ph6fie:
Phykidal Addres. icon
J
Type of Operation: Swhi
Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity:
'Ntimber of Animals -on' Sit6.-
-
DEM C6rdficition Numb6r: FACE- DEM ardficatioh Number: ACNE
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: H40---Jieet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have -sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour siorru event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard. LFc. -Z.al Jnches':
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes ortg/Was any .erosion &ved? or,
Zs adequate land available for spray? Y6s or 30 Is the cover crop- adequate,Yes orb,7�
(7F6p{s) being utilized.
0 C',
Does thelfacility meet SCS m, immum setback criteria? 200 Feet fr6m­­D�Vellings?- or No
'V
100 Feet fr6 Wells? if g-cr N­8?,'.�',`,-z*,,.-
A?
�he anirn�l waste st6ckpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stkc�arn? �i--Yes� ar No ,fi
irrigated within 25 Feet of a: USGS Map Blue Line?.. -Y. N animal waste land applied or spray ir appl es.
TsaMM waste discharged into waMm of the state by man-made ditcli, f1iishing system,
3imil 'man-made devices? Yes or No If Yesi, Please EXp IiIii.
'X?cs 01c, facility waititain adequate waste management records (volume's of ruanure,-Iand applied spray "gated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additinn.ql Onrnmp.mc.,
cc: Faci.;'iy Assessment Unit
Signature
Use Attache

RRO P.02i02
4-1995 15:26 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
Site Requires Immediate Attcntiort- ev
Facility No.
DIVISION OF EN-VIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Farm Name/owner:
Mailing Address: _
County:
Integrator: Phone: 52
On Site Representative: „!� Cr _ Phone:
Physical
Type of Operation:` Swind Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site-,
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 / Longitude: Elevation: , meet
G 2�jylr/ Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard 6—��t. /0 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes orCy Was any erosion observed? Oor No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or io Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or o
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?. 200 Feet from Dwellings?. Qor No
100 Feet from Wells? �970r No
'_r anima] waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line. Stream? Yes or No
arurnal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
.S animal waste discharged into waters of the state by than -made ditch, flushing system, or other
-imi,ar man-made devices? Yes or No If. Yes, Please Exglain.
r)t,cs thr- facility waantain adequate waste mauagernrint records (volumes of manure, -land applicd,
spray "gated on specific acreage withh cover crop)? Yes or No
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Signature
` Use Attachments if Needed.
`a TOTAL P.02