330026_PERMIT FILE_20171231

(Type of Visit: Q Compliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:' r Arrival Time: 11)Z271 Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ��/'/���� r l�lr-� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Pq,/ �rA �C� Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Wean to Finish
er
Wean to Feeder
ELa
Non-L,
Feeder to Finish
;
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Gilts
eNon-L;
Boars
Poults
Other I I IM I 10ther
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Cow
ow
Cy alf
Hy eifer
Cow
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Region:
❑ Yes L2'No NA ❑ NE
❑Yes�fo
[]N ❑NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes N� IVA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes VWEJ NA ❑ N E
❑Yes Wo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

FaciIi Nu'm er: 3 - Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ONE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste_ Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No [] NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable CropWindow [] Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. CropTYpe(s): 1 34er'" +
n 4 4 5"r4-in-S
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ YesFNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
D Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspecti;(N
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[] NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Z Date of Inspection: Js'�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes&�N�oo NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
34. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
!Y'I
1 "b1-4,- 69., � d I
(, J) e Su rva r M A-2 -�
3-
v
❑ Yes ❑ No . ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[] NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[] NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: q (9 71 t ` 24 o
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r3 (,� S T'� �e7„/ �� , Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015

5 - 2 6 ---1 7
JType of Visit: (31.00 m ce Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I
(Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: G d Departure Time: ® County:
Farm Name: j2, � Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: P4- cn/ Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Desi10111 gn Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity
Pop.
Wean to Finish
I
11-ayer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I
INon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr, P.outtr.
C•.a acit
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes „ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) El YesgNo❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes VNo[:]
A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ YesA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - 'Z I jDateof Inspection: -Z2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs, ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window E] Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
d
12. Crop Type(s): er h k t1 A, 5 Ai 1 } r 4 i rlf
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 ° Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: 13 - Z L jDate of Inspection: S —2 2 T% j
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IVo NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to,question ##): Explain any.YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any,other comments, ;� }
Use draw'o.beterezlain sivatons(use.adiionalagessnecessar , y)?
'PI co S,61 J, 0
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C 6`s��%Z ` —C&- E r {�C
Page 3 of 3
Date:-S Z Z —t
21412015

to - 71 1G
(Type of Visit: ,Q rRoutine
liance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
sit:
Reason for Vi0 Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: x0—/ / Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: G„ I 6717�zlii Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Title:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: 01 r S
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Region:
Design
Current
Design
CurrentJill
Design Current
Swine
Capacity
Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
@aI le
Capacity
Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
_2Lia
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D , P,oultr.
C:a acit
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
113eef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ N E
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
//7
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes❑
NA
VNo
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[] Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No • NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): --7 Z, /(41
ram
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYpe(s): A,d"+ , 5,PT
13. Soil Type(s): ,
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes )ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
-No
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
El
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ YesEJIN"o
❑ NA
[] NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑! /No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and i" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: '34 [Date of Inspection: Z0 --
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance.
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [] NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑Yes ❑No DNA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Commments (refer;to questions#): Explain:aby YES: answers and/or any additional recommendations or anyiother comments.
Use drawings of facility to Better explain situations`(use additional pages as necessary):,
S 5l *_ j 19 / 4-h �_ S 1 A A �Q
1 1
l 6 Q 5°' W i 1( i G C� S[ k ,j� y
►rt G -5
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: 7 5 /- y 2v 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: jye, ST-aff_ �t9Z,%s7iii
Page 3 of 3
Date: (P " .20 —(A
21412015

3( Zz r f
z
Type of Visit: fp CgarMiance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit:/'0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time:
Departure Time: County:
Farm Name:
S
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: PA k, / J'rR�2
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: M f� + f
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design
Swine Capacity
to Finish
Current
Pop.F11L
Design Current
ltry C►apacity Pop.
a er
Desi11111111Fgn Current
Cattle Capacity PoWean
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder.
Design Current
Dr. P■oultr, Ca aci P■o P.
Dai Heifer
Dry Cow
Non-Dal
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other I I
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA , ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Zi o ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

[Facility Number: - Z- Date of Inspection:
L
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes❑
VNoNA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):/
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
e rNoO NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environm=]NA
at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [] Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): De- r r\M ri ., S
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes❑
FN
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
[] NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Faci lity Number: 3 jDate of Inspection: 1 Z-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NVNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant'sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the racility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility'? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative`?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Cominents (refer to'questionF#): Explim any YES answers an'd/,or any;additional recoinmenda_ tions,or, any other cgtnments: N �
Use drawings of facility to better explainsituations, (use additional pages as tecessary).�
S
dF_
SCE ✓� 2Z
y
Prt11^�r�/ v-= 2
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: '] J,r % Z V-Z`j
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �V tje� l
Page 3 of 3
Date: .3 ! t I / ( Z__
21412011

Type of Visit: .ems Comp ' ce Inspection U Operation Review V Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance j
Reason for Visit: outing 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access I{
Date of Visit: / / Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: j��}G� /2%g�/<'P Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: # (3 " 3'
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
1.
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry
Capacity Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
an toFinish La er
Dai Cow
an to Feeder
T
Nan -La er
Dai Calf
der to Finish
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dry P,oultr.
Ca aci I;o
Non-Dai
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Beef Feeder
Boars
ullets
Beef Brood Cow
urke s
er urke Poults
Other ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ZEno ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
A
❑ Yes
o NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑Yes
o [] NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes
r3N
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes O'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): —
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
To ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
Ef No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t eat, notify DWQ
entNo
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[:]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes:No
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu., Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s): r %YL 'r
a
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
<No❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
J NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
VNo
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have ail components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
ZNo [] NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

lFacility•Number: 73 - Date of inspection: /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
[]Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Yes Z No C NA
❑ Yes
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
NNA
jNojNA
NA
o ❑ NA
❑No ❑NA
Cornments (refer to question #): Explain anyvYES answers and/or any additional recornmendations�or}anyeother comments.;
Use drawings of facllity to better explain"situations (use additional pales as necessary)
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21417011

r
tYt C 1 IL 1 V
Z
Type of Visit 4 Corn
ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1% ` Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ��1�w r OK�"Ize- Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: ai, Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = o = f = Longitude: = ° = =
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine
C►apactty Population Wet Poultry
Capacity
Population
Cattle
C►apacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer
1lEI—
❑Dai Cow
II
❑ Wen to Feeder ❑Non -La er
❑Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish lO
❑ Dai Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ D Cow
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
El Beef Stocker
El Gilts
Non -Layers ers
❑Beef Feeder
El Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Num er of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Imoacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of' the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑Yes 2<0_�❑NA ONE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 2j —
Date of Inspection Z f to
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit`? ❑Yes Na NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
r-
0
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes � ❑ NA IQ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ YesrNo
NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name A A Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: jql� Ohl -c-- (( Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Re wired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes O
No NA El
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CA WMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections
❑ eather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
NA
El NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ YesNA
PNo
El NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
NA
[I NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes
NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
1 ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
ce
Additio°nal'Comments and/or. Drawings
AL
w
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Y 3Dc
(Type of Visit: OJCom nee Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
!!Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: �%—%/� Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: I2,_alzr-Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ta/'4,' 0,rq /2Y Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design C►urgent
'Design
Current
Design Current
Swine
C*apacity Pop.
Wet Poultry Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
n to Finish
La er
Dai Cow
n to Feeder
-Layer
Dai Calf
er to Finish
Dai Heifer
w to Wean
I
Design
Current
D Cow
w to Feeder
D a P,oult , Ca aci
P.o
Non -Dairy
w to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
s
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkc Points
Other
Other
D_ischarses and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes �Noo
NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes N A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 21412011 Continued

ti
Facility Number: - 2-L jDateof Inspection: L
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [3 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Hare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [] Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �fl.Gcd %i�i�2 Ay SUMS t 0q_ 1'
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ZNoNA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes��NoEo]
NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VN NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [:]Maps [:]Lease Agreements ❑Other: / f
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes H;jNo [3NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ElWeekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Tre ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspection ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - 2 Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �00
NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes jZrNo NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[3 Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question I#): .. Ezplam.any YES answers an any additional recommendations or any other commentii9
.> R 'E
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary) ;+
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: 21j — y 2—O'U
Date: �Z . 1_ _
21412011
Page 3 of 3

Z — 12. t
Type of Visit: AD Co ance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: lI 1'/ Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: r�J�/,i arv- S Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:�j / ��/✓�-��1 Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine
Capacity Pap.
Wet Poultry
C►►apacity
Pap.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
U--d
Layer
Dai Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non-Layer
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dr. P,oultr.
Ca aci
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
Turkey Poults
Other.I
10ther
Discharp-es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
[] Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ YesrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412071 Continued

Faclkty Number: jDate of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
eN ❑ NA
❑ NE
a, If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environm;;r-o
eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes gNo Q NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑Yes K ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes � "o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0N ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records _& Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspectio ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facilityfail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Faci i Number: Ts - Z Date of Inspection: (Q I
O'e
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA0 NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes FZNo -NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer°to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drnwings.of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
()-,- I 6)
(' & - t<( LI
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: ? / Y200
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412011

-- (-? --1S-
(Type of Visit: QrCom ' ce Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: ORoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: — (-/> Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: y,��G-/��r1 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
OnsiteRepresentative: 0.4—a-1 a�rfT/�Q-
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: N 1
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
J!
Design
Capacity
Finish
7Feedner
Current Design ffCurrent
Pop. VVet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
DairyCow
Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Design Current
Dr. P,oultr, Ca aci P.o
Layers
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other___JML
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
10ther
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other;
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) [3Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes PNo�
❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Faci ity Nuthber: -2Z jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment "":
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes . �NoD
NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: .
Designed Freeboard (in);
Observed Freeboard (in): �
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integnty of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ro_
NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
2No
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate
Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
D NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
��o❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
gNo
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box
❑WUP []Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes eNo NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [] Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

[Facility Number: Date of Ins ection: — er - f
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yest�0�00 NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA. ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.`' ,
Use drawines of facility to better explain situations (use,additional paces as necessary},
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: .7eyZ — —C v
Reviewed]nspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412011

cility Number Date of Visit: 0 Time:
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted O Certified U Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: DEA, t 12 ✓a County:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: / n
Certiitied Operator: �� �' r ,U ✓4 l� e-
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Phone No:
Integrator: Alen, 5-y C .
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 6 ° 0" Longitude a 1 0"
Design
Swine Ca aci
Current
P15 ulatiou
Ploulfr. X,:
Design ` Cu`ri ent
Ca' RI I'o lation Cattle
Design Current
Ca aci Po ulation
❑ We o Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
ceder to Finish I&q D
❑ Non -Layer
I
ILI Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
Total Design Capacity
T©tal SSLW
Number of Lagoons �' ❑Subsurface Drains Present ElLa oon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
------- -
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem
Di 8� Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structu e l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: i1^ _N�c. • rr �,..
Freeboard (inches): it 3 1 r
05103101
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
El Yes
❑ Yes5No
o
El Yeso
El Yes
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: — Z­ Date of Inspection Z D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type J ar (�1ZJ'Gu
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in th Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
/
❑ Yes
Li No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
❑<o
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
© No /
❑ Yes
Cl Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No .'
A
❑ Yes
,❑ No
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ Yes
0 No'
❑ Yes
i
�-j No i
❑ Yes
❑ No//
❑ Yes
❑'No
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Cninrilents (efer to question'#) Explain any YE9 answ rvaInd/or:anyar@COmmetldBtiDn5i0[ ally, OtheP eoltl'inents" '� "
.Use drawings of facility to better�explain sihlatians (use ad ditional:pages�as;necessary) . ' ❑Field Copy ❑'Final Notes
_..>
Reviewer/Inspector Name"�;i>�..1(�i '
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Zl
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 7 Z b
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged till pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes I.
❑ Yes ZNo
Additional Comments and/or
r
05103101

z% ak,3 .�p4 p r, _ Division of Water Qdahty
FCll[ty`Number Z Q'Diyision,of Soil and Water Conservation, R
- --- --- Q Other Agency
r
f Visit Compl' ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
n for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: /( p Arrival Time: ® Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: //�� Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: /�Ya — 5
Certified Operator: �-� Pe'`-/� ¢- Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
F
<� Design 1
�5wine �:' ;; Ca acity Pa
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
5
Feeder to Finish M G% t)
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o ❑ d ❑ Longitude: ❑ o = & =
Design Current Design F
n Wet Poultry,..Capacity ,:Population'' . Cattle , Capacity i?
Other
❑ Other
•jLI Non -Layer I J I�
Dry Poultry
❑
Layers
❑
Non -Layers
❑
Pullets
❑
Turkeys
❑
Turkey Poults
❑
Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
{
u'mtier of Structures.
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ,E] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes n' r
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — z
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
[]Yes No NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
r,
Observed Freeboard (in): !J [%
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes I No , ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes a o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No I NA ElNE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ FAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) ,, J
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ZNo NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
NA ❑ NE
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendatjons or any,other comments fft
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use;additional'pages as necessary) i p
�
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G. Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —Z Date of Inspection Zl d
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes "NoNA [INE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑ ether
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ;�T�O[:] NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VN
[I NA El NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? El Yes El NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? El Yes N 6 NA ElNE'
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
0z
Page 3 of 3 12128104

ip
s ..
Division of Water Quality: CJ ! 7 0'7
Facility Number:E:U:0 Divisions of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency`
Type of Visit Compl' Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ZJ ti9 !7 Arrival Time: : l-P-6 1 Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: _ �f '/ r Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _0k- r ►-)` KP-
Title:
Phone:
Integrator: -Kr(
Phone No:
s4P .
Operator Certification Number:
Sack -up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Region:
Latitude: a o = 1 Longitude: = ° 0
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Laver
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle CapacityPopulation°"
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy hleifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:, .
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA E-NE
❑ Yes o �NA El
❑ Yes No ❑ NA Cl NE
❑ Yes N ❑ ❑ NE
❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
0
12128104 Continued

Facillty Number: 33 —
Date of InspectionIV20(071
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Z 21,16 IZ (1,
❑ Yes zo"XA El NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ,�No NA [I NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
mai ntenancelim provement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, ,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or I0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
I
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
IS, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
IK ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
ReviewerlInspector Name 134e 5 ale t7Z,T Phone: �9 �r y Z G c
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 0
12128104 Continued

0
Facility Number: -6 —Z Date of Inspection Z�
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections e her Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes o N ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

A
� ------ -- � Avis""ion of Water Quality
Facility Number i "z Q Division of Snil and Water Conservation
--- Q Other Agency
Type of Visit &Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: LZ Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: rH-_ ..,,_ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: 1�)4 '_ I
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = 0 0 d 0 `1 Longitude: = o = 1 = u
Design
DesignCurrent
Design Current
In
Wet Poultry Cyapacity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
JEJ Non -Layer I I
Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
Gifts
❑Non -La ers
El Beef Feeder
PE]
ElBoars Pullets
ElBeef Brood Cow
El Turkeys
other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesrNo
NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ YesNA ❑ NE
Page1 of 3 12128104 Continued

i
Facility Number: 3 Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Noo O NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
[I Yes
P'No 11 NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier: ' erg
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):2~] 2 /l
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
P<O ❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
,.
LdNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmentaZo
(notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
o INA
El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or ] 0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) r-5— S't►� Gj l,c�
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
91No NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El Yes
No' NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
PNNA
[3NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NE
}Comments (re!'ery �o�que5tton;#) tExplamkany�YE$ answers�andlo�'�anytrecommendate�ans,or- any athetr,�camtnents.' t � S
`,,Use �draw�n�s�of factltty'to better explum sttuattons. (use ;addttEonall'pages,as necessary}������ >x�,�ta;
ReviewerlInspector Name Phone:
Reviewerllnspector Signature: �Date: (2 2
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

J
Date of Inspection 2 D
Facility Number: —2
Required
Records_& Documents
"NoA
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes;>No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps Cl Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Zo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
❑ ther Code
Rain Inspectio�N�ooj,,45NA
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑.NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ YesZN
NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
2 A
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ YesA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ YesA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit'? (icl discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE.
Additional°Comments'andlor,Drawings:''i
Page 3 of 3 12128104

10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection gp
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 13 Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .. r/� %n F`- County:- Ley ......................
1.........1.....................................................................................L... -�
OwnerName:............. ................................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
.1...
..................
Facility Contact: �Ai ....!•'!�GY�GL. ..Title• .... Phone No:... ................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ................................................................ .............. ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:... Q.05..ua I..YI......... .......................................
Certified Operator:........ .. .�...:...��.✓.. A1G Q......................................................... Operator Certification Number: .......................... I...............
Location of Farm:
A
................ . .. . ..... I ......... ­....... ................................................. I.,........................................................
Latitude Eir]•° ®« Longitude ©• =` "
❑ Wean to Feeder
eeder to Finish t3
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
r1 Boars
V F, Cu>rent Design Current. Destgn ECurrent
Population Poultry Capacity ;Poputatiuns' Cattle ,! `, Capacity°Population
❑ Layer
�' ❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Totalbe" s g
jj
T
`3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
sli ..'i! ; ❑ No Liquid Waste Managen
] Non-Dairy.1
a
41
apac�
_ ity,csv
�I �SSLW
] Lagoon Area . ❑ Spray Field Area
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ff
Freeboard (inches): ............................................................
...........................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integriN
f any of the s�tseepage, etc.)
observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
�
3/23/99 f6 ��6 11.,
❑ Yes No
[]Yes
❑ Yes L_60�
❑ Yes No
ElYes Livo
❑ Yes ❑,pd'o
❑ Yes , "v
Structure 6
...........................................
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

W
Facility Number: 33 — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
e z
.f`o CC.tG i /J.2—n•- c,- �'� /'ice n/. � � ���
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Ids o
❑ Yes U`'1
❑ Yes
❑ Yes o
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 01N0
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Z�O�
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �Q1 O
Required Records & Document~
17., Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes re rlNo
0
23. Did Reviewer/,Ins ctor fail to discuss review/inspectionF with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
24. D�faciquire a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
25. Wional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes
yigiaf<ignjs;o d�>Flc�encies were )iQted• OiWi ft #hls:vls% • Y:oo Will•teeeiye 06
• cur'respondence: abaut this visit: • .................... • . • ...... • . • . • . • ... • . • . .

Facility Number: 33 — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'?
❑ Yes 00
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes N
El YesjNo
❑ Yes No
'Additional dmmen 'an or Drawings. r
, i..� ',.; s{3 ( „��4�rci S�i.,F �
3/23/99

Type of Vlsit Qf Com ' ce Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Z Date of Visit: Time:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted 13Certified [3Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...........•.•.
FarmName: ...plgk.../......Pzalp ..... ram-'..`.�.............................................. County:...................................................................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .......................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...........................
Onsite Representative:......................................................... Integrator: „
..............................................
Certified ....................................................
.. Operator Certification Number: .........................................
.... ..... ........ ..............
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
Design : Current
ne Capacity :Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
eeder to Finish
D
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current =Uesign`';�I
Poultry Capacity Po' `ulation Cattle 01pacity
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I ❑ Non-Dairy
l I
❑ Other
Tofal Design Capac>Ity C
UW,SSLW
Numberof Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area '.
,` I�Holdin Ponds/SolidTra� ,! a.
g ps� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system"? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structulr-e 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: V41 i+.W tM ..... �! .......... .
Freeboard (inches):
5100
s•'
❑ Yes .
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes _8'No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes [ o
❑ Yes eNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
Continued on bank

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/9/2001
( b
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type l e f , A, P , dQ r
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does the! facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0._
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o%
❑ Yes
❑ Yes Ids 0
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 1[I n+o .
❑ Yes I61V0
Required Records & Documents
17. Fait to have Certificate of Coverage &General Permit readily available? ❑Yes
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes PeNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes;�No,,,
24. Does facility re a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes Id No
25. Were a dditional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes
Q yigl (iQz}s'© 0efeie01e were )m0fg(I 0twift Ns'visit; • Y60 #J11-tOtiye tjti Cur fir'
correspondence. about. this visit: • .... -. - . - .. '. • . • .... •..... • . • .... - . • ........ .
lli.'t
Reviewer/Inspector
Name
7
Sroo
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: —1 � �� �`^ _ Date: �i -

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection / y
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Printed on: 1/4/2001
❑ Yes I2�t D
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
ElYes Leo
El Yes Id" o
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
01/01/01

Type of Visit Q'Comph46nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit oRoutine 0 Complaint � 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: Time: �J
,- 1-11 qPQ Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted O Certified O Conditionally Certified D Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
G�
Farm Name: to j'+a t—/r A-- County:
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: 21, 'go A,
Certified Operator: f�� �"yy 20"�, _ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ CaHle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 ° " Longitude ' 11
Design Current Design Current Design Current
;Sw'ine Capacity Population Poultry Cat)acitv Po ulation _' Cattle Capacit
y Population `.
❑ We Feeder I JE] Layer ❑ Dai j
ceder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I I[] Non-Dairyf
❑ Farrow to Wean I ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts El Boars Total SSLW
atruciur 1 3UU-,1u1U Z. ouuuulc
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
ODU-LUJU-t OLIM UM J JL1uutu1G U
Continued

Facility Number: g3 — Z
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type IV
13. Do the receiving crops differ wit those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records &Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facil' require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. We; any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
ElYes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes N
ElYes No
❑ Yes [2 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ N
El Yes N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes
❑ Yes PN�
❑ Yes ,—Q,/No
Cl Yes
Cl Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
o violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Co mments'(refer to que`stionfi): Explain any YlrS nswer`s andLor any recommendations or any othera�coinmentsc
[.iNdrawin�s o5fa�ilttygt6;hetter explain situations: (use additional�pages csS6*ce"' scary) ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
:, �.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
05/03/01 Continued

€ype of Visit O Commence Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit -_O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
F rty Number Date of Visit: 2 Time;D
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified © Conddiitionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ..... ......Oz-,1 4........� ��............................................ County:.....................................................................................
OwnerName : ............................................... .... .................................. ......... ............................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative............ .............. Inte rator: �►"' — 5 T�
-•------------•---•.................................... 8...........................................
Certified Operator:.......... '" f PYA��Q .. Operator Certification Number: ........................................................................................... .......................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 4 " Longitude ' 4 «
' Desaign �Curraetiatn.
�
esia '
u`mrraetnrot
Swine
rt _C
3
oC
nP
W to Feeder
b,xe;
Layers`
❑
eeder to Finish
rj
=393`
❑Non -Layer
[3 Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
° ❑
� Other
E] ]Farrow to Finish
Tot''! Desi,
5 i k E 3
{P 3
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure; I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes
❑ Yes/0 No
-uctur 6
Identifier:........................................................................ --•........................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

r
A.
Facility Number: Date of Inspection 1.4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes e
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes o
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ 'Yes tNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level El Yes
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type .� M,=� /.n�^ n.✓r
13. Do the receiving crops differ with tho(a designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes "
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
=,&7PQ74''. };xjOj .iLi , 1-1,
'-;C! =2 ^f11l ^so�:def!S:�;�.ifId:P'Fimati8e143, N,ren, s''!n �a.IIE ("$$ riaa s;e3i�•iE: I9olaf"P¢i.. &. 7•a,tr:�€orc!I5xp}th� :ytqn� u.e;d�:?'��!pNstnjjj4 to�7] i;! !?owIEr.>b;�Evi,:nyyat[[a�elba#°i ) �Rrcaj E.=.aa•x�.?.:jtp= l¢�4aai$4i�:tn�r'm3>w.a<.'ii_a:ny§.��Y38pg:E;}d3' iS':,°}�,dra= 8n{s'���,we:r,.s e3�a),:r-r,e! 7$ni4:au.d/.o��r,i F. anr.>Gg-n�-i�§: z:�r.Elyre�ii1 3'e¢r::R!�co��_.a. min,'¢rQceu;i�dn;n$d�N13lkaf t a{, �o}ii•y�•(,n�s:t}+�.a-:l�
io9>ir'l,PrGttfi'i{.f.aanP�.y•.. oe...� t.4.h::I...ek�w.3r�rq,.1cdicm...'.�a,r}w' �me.r
lns►tuat.ons {useadditionaa sasnecesry[Field Copy
.; �pyau.;
,
A,
1�,� t5' �1 1],2��1 I— F.i 't;,��n %b+t 'x C' F� * .1 i7�'�
Reviewer/Ins ector Name q p y r (( '� dZ
p Af: 1.a .,i x I. r ti ri G�f/A i i L, �4 d.t� 37 � � `%' b�. d3 , Ik e•;:. i„? ['a 1. fi1r,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 7?_
12112103 Continued

Facility Number:z� —� Date of Inspection 2
Required Records & Document_~
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
El Yes
❑ Yes JaVO
❑ Yes .tom
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes E 0
❑ Yes o
ElYes o
ElYes o
i
❑ Yes
❑'No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

F
pe of Visit C pHance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
eason for Vi ' 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: '7 Z f ArrivalTime: p Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ?�� I l�r14"14 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: aj -
-B
ack-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
W� to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:
Latitude: = o = 4 Longitude: 0 ° = d
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑
Layers
❑
Non -Layers
❑
Pullets
❑
Turkeys
❑
Turkey Poults
❑
Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ DairyCow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures: =1
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (lf yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes no�0[01
NA El NE
El Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

r -A,
Facility Number: 33 —Z
Date of Inspection Z Uj
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: W4L
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): AV « a t;
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ZN<o❑NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 64011"EINA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Ai mlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o j NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
1 l . Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination` ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[7N El NA ❑NE
N El NA ONE
0 N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Name Reviewer/Ins ector , w r :' f;`{ ` 4<"° p °;` Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z� (I C7
I2,128104 Continued

s ..
Facility Number: 1j Z 6 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El;No"'F-1Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes iQ 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking
❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑,Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA El NE
❑ Yes No. ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IdN NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes LdN Ll NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ElNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes jLi No ❑ A El NE
El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additlonal,Comments and/or Drawin S ar '
.: g n --t: t .P` rAS<.R'c �" x
12128104

Div:: n of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
-,vision of Water Quality
JQ'Routine O Com0laint O Follo-.v-up'rif l)I Q inspection O Hollow -up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Z ��
Time of Inspection to i�r�J 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered 0Certified Ej Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: .1� ! � � ... County:....... :Galrrr r................................ I .........
,
................................................................ G ,
Owner Name.......I ..,�.�t :.L.......!1 r. ` .......... Phone No:...,i .4Q............ .1..:.. ./...................... �...1..
Facility Contact: ... ! .ta 1.......j ! � ..f.:..................... Title:.........................., .. Phone No:...................................................
�% 11
Mailing Address :...........:.............( �.� ........`..Rid.........L.......�.1�6..1.................................... .............
/.....n.......... ..........
Onsite Representative:.... 5a.......1/f:. ' G.fry................................................... Integrator:......-, . ..............................................
Certified Operator; ............: -+r................................................... Operator Certification Number-,.........................................
Location of Farm:
L
t..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................t w t
Latitude Longitude
Y r Design
Cur"rent r ,Design Current: Design' � Current
Swme` "
Capacity
Population Poultry` Capacity Population ,Cattle 4 CapacityPopalatton
❑ Layer
❑Dairy
F�Eean(,)�FeEede
ceder
f
❑Non -Layer
❑Non-Dairy
Farrow. to Wean2,5
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
4TbtalDesign Capacity
❑ Gilts
r .. M.
❑ Boars
�. Total SSU
:t
Number agoons Holding
onds. ❑Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
CM
��
...
sw ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
Jr. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts.to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25197 F
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes;ZNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 7Np
❑ Yes VN
❑ Yes E ,
r
❑ Yes
Continue i
I

acilit.�,iSumber: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'! N ❑ Yeti a 0
Structures (Lagoons,liolding Ponds, Flush Pits, eti.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes r o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier,t-� lv— c..1.1..1...... .. �— ......... . „'.� .�......
Freeboard(ft): ,.....,...�(.............. 2•......,.........r�`,.....:........:,...........,......, ..................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures'?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12.1 Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'!
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
t
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
f
G
0 Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes "No
❑ Yes �10
CO Yes o
15. Crop type �Q'rA .!r....... .. .. �fr...�.............................................................. ................................................................ ........................ I.........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWIVIP)? ❑ Yes r o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Z No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ZI No
19. tIs there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No`
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes' TO
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes No
22. Does record keeping"need improvement? r Cl Yes , o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facilityfail to have a co of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No
PY g Y
24. Wer�anyitional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes r o25. Witional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit:' ^ -+. ?. , s :. El Yes
No.violations or d'icieneie's.were'noted-dur.ing this.visit.' Noil4ill receive no further
: correspondence ii oitt this.visit.:
I Comiraents (refer to question #) Explain any .]r:IAS answers and/or tang recommnyendations or ao#her comments; ". I
Use drawingsAof facility to better explain situ atirin5 {use additional pages as ncustiary}:'
r.
7/25/97

SrA
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
September 19, 1997
Mr. Paul Drake
Route 2, Box 364
Pinetops, North Carolina 27864
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility # 33-26
Drake Farms
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Drake:
On September 16, 1997, Mr. Buster Towell from the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal facility. The inspection
is part of the Division's efforts to determine compliance with the State's animal
waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection determined that the operation was not discharging wastewater into
waters of the State and that operations were proceeding according to your
approved Animal Waste Management Plan. As a result of the inspection, the
facility was found to be in compliance with the State's animal nondischarge
regulations.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility maintenance are an important
responsibility of all animal waste producers. The Division of Water Quality has
the responsibility to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect the
natural resources of the State.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation and compliance. If you
have any questions regarding this inspection please call Mr. Buster Towell at
[phone].
Sincerely,. w
Judy Gar ett,
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department
Mr. A. B. Whitley, Edgecombe Soil and Water
Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC•-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files 3900 Bared Drive, Suite 101 ' Raleigh. NC 27609
Voice [phone] • FAX[phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
5004 ncyclod 1 10'/o post•cowumer paper

Date of Inspection
Facility Number 'Z
Time of Inspection amn 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ R ered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr .15 min)) Spent on Review
Certifled ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...... . ................. . ..... . . ..... . ...... . ............... . . ........ ..... ........ . . ....... ...... ................ ........... ......
FarmName:.......�C.... `'. ..<`� 1e�i!`5 ........... ....................... ............. County:.."Y.— . e.................. ......... ........... ...
Land Owner Name:... I:... 'r'.....1�r'<r,�L..................................................... Phone No: ... f? -7 ... j.7..�...2 sZ.l....................
FacilityConctact:....................... .................................. QTitle:......................................... Phone No: ............ ..............u..............................
MailingAddress:.... ..Z......kk.x..... 3k...L..............ti.....'. �.. ............. � ,.�. ............Z..7 ..7 .........................
Onsite Representative:...A.`"...!^.JLr....................................................... Integrator:.��.�.......................................
Certified Operator:.................i.....�C4AC.L.'................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm: �� /// ...I /,,,. /*- 1,� —1. i�"(x, t_y
Latitude �• �� ��� Longitude �• ��"
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
- s Ste'
DesigiCurrent� Design Cur�ent� q Design .......
urrent „
me Cai Po ulatipn h Poulti
dcy�11
a PCa aci 1'b" ii2i�tron' the 6 Ala
a ace ulation
an to Feeder❑ Layer IQ Dairy
Feeder to Finish ❑ ❑ Non -Layer fr Nan-Dai
rT ,��
#
Farrow to Wean
X.
Farrow to Feeder TotalDes�gnCapae�iy,
Farrow 10 Finish
n Total SSLWR
' }
❑ Other
-General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
7:�.
❑ Yes Livl No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes gl'_
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 7�16
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes o
Continued on back

• Facility Number: _21.
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes
7. Did the facilityfail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes�N�o
P P g
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Structures ([,Mons ar}d/or Holding Ponds,
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
... ...�:.s....... r .............. ...� ....f ................ ............................ ............. _............. ........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes eNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes a
(If in excess of 3W,,MP,��or_ru/noff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop h'Pe ......�:5...!r� L..�,l���f.�!�! �r,� � KJ...................I.....................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes 2 0 -
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 1;
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? EljNo
�1
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
For C_er_tifedEacilif'es�Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No
Reviewer/Inspector Name >',�.t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Paul Drake
Ri. 1 Box 364
ftetops, NC 27864
MAI
C)1EHNF;Z
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
May 13, 1997
SUBJECT: Operation Review Summary
Drake Farms Facility No. 33-26
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Drake,
On May 2, an Operation Review was conducted of Drake Farm, facility no. 33-26. This Review, undertaken in
accordance with G.S. 143-215.10D, was one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations during the 1997
calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
It was determined that no corrective actions are necessary as the result of this Review, since waste was not being
discharged to the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were
maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator. A copy of the completed review form is
enclosed for your information.
The review determined that the farm was operating in accordance with the approved animal waste management
plan. Please remember that you are required to obtain either an amendment to your existing plan or a new waste utilization
plan before any changes are made in crop type or harvest method on land included in your plan. All land used for nutrient
application from animal waste systems must be included in the waste utilization plan. The plan must be certified by either
a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For additional assistance with the plan, please contact your
local Soil and Water Conservation District Office or local Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review. Please do
not hesitate to call me at 919/571-4700 ext. 208 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information.
Sincerely,
l�)ZI% L
Margare O'Keefe
Environmental Engineer I
a: Edgecombe Soil and Water Conservation District
Judy Garrett, Water Quality Regional Supervisor
John College, Hanor Farms
DSWC Regional Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone] B
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NOC
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

O;Drvision of,Soil and Water'Conservation - Operation Review 4,:
0 DOMon of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Of
ivision of Water Quality -'Compliance Inspection
[3,Other' Agency - Operation Review
10 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of MVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time +rl' Insj)eOion 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted Certified [] Conditionally Certified [3 Registered JE3 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ...L.:}..'... Y..... f t"i D(.! L [,.. Q7.K..���! r� J County:......Lr. . ....ce..................................
Owner Name:..........1 ��L f hone i\o:.....z Z ' �z 7 "ZsZ p
.a!.....................................................:........................ '
Facility Contact : ................. Phone No:
.�................................................. Title: _ .
Mailing Address:......... ..Z.......V.. .% .....3.6..y.... .......... Ei. n........... f. � L f '-1-7. t... ...................I........... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative:..... .it............/..}.l....0..................................................... Intel;rator:................................................................................_.....
Certified Operator: 1>..q 'L .......... I ... Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 1 11 Longitude • 4 44
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ , n to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry_ Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains ['resent ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharues & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)'!
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. II' discharge is observed, was the conveyance inan-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. li' discharge: is observed. what is the estimated flow in gathnin?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon systcnt?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes 0Na
❑ Yes No
ElYcs No
❑ Yes
. ZNo
❑ Yes
N
❑ Yes
;No
❑ Yes
No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
ldent.ifier: .... ................. ...........36
Freeboard(inches): �Y` ........... ........ I-- ....... I ............. ................... I ................ ................ I ...................
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Z 1 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need snaintenancelimprovement'?
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any huffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
I I. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
7L_LLL�LJ
❑ Yes o
ElYes o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
r
12. Crop type l�` ..r....y....6oF,,tr+r..........I..pv.'n! .g;-...q.,n�........J...S'''.'`"^!'"!�^.�.......................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? Oyes Ero
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'? ❑ Yes16. Is there a lack ofadequate waste application equipment?❑ Yes
.Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Anima{ Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, frechoard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes PNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? El Yes
21, Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, fr eboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes N '
23. DidZRev' erllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑Yes o
24. D ity require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
N:o:vialations.or. deticien. cies :were nated: during f iii-vWi:: Yotx -w' fl1're' CA1ve ita further :'
eot;respotidence: about; this visit.: ..... .
'Comments (refer to question #):.Explain any YES answers and/or any: recommendations or any other comments ,+ ti i;.:
Use.drawings,of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)
L r
ram-• i 'F-y ►'Lt (� f 3-v ` ' 3 r . -�/ w (� ,o 4—o s' a „� - C V A=d=_
PP I `� . AAI'
A J v CC A r{ e(. Wt Aj U r r-4r 7 J� ,r-
At.q
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:- Z7V I/6/99

Revised Januan, 22, 1999
.JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number .33 -- Z G
Farm Name: is i '--s
On -Site Representative: Aw( P1446¢-
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: TirWe. fl
Date of site visit: (-�� Z1 [ 4}
Operation is'fla4ged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: ~t - Annual farm PAN deficit-�-n7 0 > pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle . 1 hard -hose !rave center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlperm nen pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;.
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2ID3 irrigatLon operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is co lete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operat' g p ra eter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete an i d by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as NhTi,)iR)Part Ill. (NOTE, 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail th e 'al ' ity checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part Il - F1 F2 F3, b v re completing computational table in Part 111).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage: or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part III.

V. �
lity Number J3
Revised ]anuan, 22, 1999
art III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF
TOTAL
CAWMP
FIELD
COMMENTS'
NUMBER NUMBER', IRRIGATION
ACRES
ACRES
%
SYSTEM
�
z
�s
III
.00
v �
4
v?
Z. -7
�
it
ICI
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on C^,WI'ViP
and type of irrication system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fieids to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possibie; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD.NUMBER2 - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS3 - back-up fields with CAWMP acreace exceeding 75% of its tote! acres and havinc received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot ser✓e as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrication system.

t Division of Soil and Water Conservation • Operation Review
Dwrstori of Soil,and Water Conservation -Coin fiance Inspection
p p
�f
0 Divtsrion of Water Quality - Compliance, Inspection
!Other Agency OPerahon Review . „
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspeytion 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspcelinn Lam, 5iv24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered 113 Not O erational !Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ............. County:.F"gk +)�1.....................................
OwnerName: ................................................... ........................................................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ....Title ................. Phone No: ...................................................
.......................................................................... .............. ..........
MailingAddress: ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
Onsite Representative:......... . .......................�. �G.(._�..................... Integrator:.H.��!1.�.�.......,...............................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 ' 64 Longitude '
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer ❑ Dairy
ceder to Finish ❑Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar ■es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it retch Water 01' the State" (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the cstitnatetl flow in gathnin?
d. Duos discharge bypass a lagoon sysicni? (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
2; Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 StruclUc 2 Structure 3 StRWIure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ,/"�
Freeboardfinches):.........�Y.�.................................0......... ................................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity ol' any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc,)
3/23/99
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes] No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ;
Q'
No
❑ Yes No
StruLturc 7
.................................
❑ Yes INoConlinuedck

Facility Number: " Date of Inspection
f 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
1 l . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding El PAN
12. Crop type k � / yh / LL E r• 1 _ 44 IF �G
❑ Yes �lo
❑ Yes V(No
❑ Yes ❑ w
❑ Yes �NO
❑ Yes No
El Yes. XNo
13.
r
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes 9No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
0
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[;�<o
Waste
18.
Does the facility fail to have all c mponents of e Certified Animal Management Plan readily available?
WUP, design,
❑ Yes
No
(ie/ checklists, maps, etc.)
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
,'Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
P]�No
21,
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
VNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Cl Yes FfNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 4No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑A0
0: ?4*,-bl; t 6, , : , '. d'i t* , ienciies -Were noted- during ois;visit: - ;Y;ou will•treceiye fiq fuftW . ; • ; • //
corres'ponden' & about this .visit .. ' . ' . - . ..
..
..
.
Comments (refer to question`#) '- Explain YES answers and/or an- �{
.m';u« t:i:heiFr �co- ntit�nE eY ntr ts, E y t
es as necessary << yrtter Use drawings of atlityEto bsinations. (use additionalpag
Reviewer/Inspector Naive
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
1011 Date:
3/23/99

Fucility Number: + ;1 — i)ate of Inspection
i
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑�I0
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? LL
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes JXNO
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ?No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes JVNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? [-]Yes V(No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes XNo
1tlOtla_�.omments an or- raw�ngs ' ': ,f �a_Vl �M3'wasl �+ k i t xr ds r: U
3/23/99

Routine
Follow-uD of
I Facility Number I
[3 Registered E3 Certified 13 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted
FarmName: ............................................................ : ................................................
OwnerName: ................................................... .......................................................
Follow-up of DSWC review '0 Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection
=24 hr. (hh:mm)
10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: .....................
............ County: ,.fr,.-. . .. .. .... . .......................
Phone No: ..............
FacilityContact: .............................. ............................................... Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: .........................................
............ 11 ............................................................... ..................................................................................... .......... I ...............
Onsite Representative:........... , ww� . .......................... integrator: ........ VW.ArAW ... .....................................
Certified Operator . .................................................. ............................................................. Operator Certification Number...........................
..............
Location of Farm:
...................................................................................................................................................................... I ............................................. I ...... 11.1 ............................................
................................................................................................................................................. I .............. 1". ........................... .... ............. ................ . ...... . ............................
Latitude 0 t it Longitude 0 4 =11
..... .. ... ...
C urrent
�Nul
... .. ... .. ..
. .. . ............ ... .
QtIMI.,
D urr
1VU ",j
L Cat
tle, Capacity,
........:. !�9plp
El Wean to Feeder Layer aEa i ry
eeder to Finish -Layer ❑U10 Non -Dairy
Non
V. 'zg vm -W J
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder EE10ther M
VA
Finish n,
El Farrow to Total aci
El Gilts
A
10 BoarsE' Total£ SSLW�
n
iirAbe�
4, .... . . .. ...
L: 6 gg FO S u _bsu rface Drains Present PUaj� Area ❑Spray Field Area
as H61ding V N
m
I N No Liquid Waste Management Eyste
r.E.
❑
❑
General
1. Are there any buffers that need mainteriancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon E]Spray Field 00ther
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did'it reach Surface Water? (If Yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
0 Yes 1;Ao
El Yes 4o
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes' eNo
El Yes
�No
0 Yes
6o
.
0 Y es
jNo
0 Yes
o
0 Yes' VNo'
0 Yes �No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/1MG17

. Facility Number: 3 "b — 2
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
Structures (Laeoons Holding Ponds. -Flush Pits, etc.)
IVNo
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes 9A0
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):....... l.r..... I ................. ...d........-EX ...� ..................................................................................................................................
...........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes ❑LNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes j No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes No
Waste Application �.
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes A!J"No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ./.'1..MV4..4 ............ .............................. .................. ............ ..........................
..........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes Id No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes 01�0
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes ONO
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 'ONO
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes P110
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes 9 No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes 5TIqo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility,f .... �. "..'..'.......'..'-- ail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes `No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
''Yes 9No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes ❑ I�To
0. No.violations:irr. deFiciencie's.were iioted-dur'ing this:visit.- Y&U.v�ill recei�e:no.ftirther.
eorrespondeince Ei obt -this:visit:: : . :.: : • :. : :... • . . . .
Corients.(refer fn tluestion`#) E�platt any YF.S answers and/or an�irernuunendt otis,or any o#he ` c tnetts.*'
.- fr'
°
t7sdcawitigs of faciLty tc► better ealplatnuset>iat>ioas it;se adattionaE pages as necesstry • x
..rit.o ? 3; •.t 3,dra..�xe,. zyac"�'.F#Rk'r .s_•;y ,r ,ub..'"'SS':.xMf'- �i'iw, .: .. .r.t
�a )C e-LE-0 V 6_;R-e773L P1a.J Q 416IV6 1.5Ae)PA3 pdtv� 'ice s �+-r�i fi
•
6-7--&-V* rZA.A� e, h1F_Tw#--LT-LTo f /t y drz L&77!5 5 pOA
�n o�.p
2K t15 �-
(44 Fog, comps . I" d- qv t Q v 15X Afe4/87r) a•) ret_s
6-6,(Wfpwtr WOW IVAS C.4,
d--L4/z/LeGr � f 5 y � 7/25/97
,
r *y }. a,> RM
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1 x` �a� , °ls a �. .,� 4:.. .
k F i. �q�'." £..;ni a iNr
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

I
Facility Number
Follow-up of DWO ins
[3 Registered [3 Certified 0 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted
Farm Name:... ................. 4.....
Owner Name: ...........................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:
Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
M Not Operational Date Last Operated:
County:. ................................
.............. Phone No:.......................................................................................
...... Phone No:. ...........................
MailingAddress: ............................................................................................ ....................................... . ..............
Onsite Representative:.,'( -4.........................`-�. /i�. , ..... Integrator:.... �[1. r.,.................. �. ...
Certified Operator;.............................................................................. .. Operator Certification Number ...................
Location of Farm:
y
......... ...... .
Latitude ' 4 46 Longitude 4 0"
General-
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system. (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
mai ntenancelimprovement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/7 C !07
Spray Field Area
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes !" No
❑ Yes ;sNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes QKAo
1
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ,J No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes )dNo
_1 ___ L__,_

Facility Number-
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? 0 Yes U(No
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.1
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Yes INo
Structure t Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 0 -
.. .1 ... 4 ............ 6 1 J - -!R� ... . ........................................................................ ................................... ...................................
Freeboard(ft) . ....... ......................... ..... ................................... ........... I ........................ .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? 0 Yes No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 0 Yes VNo
12, Do any of the structures need main ten ance/improvement? Yes 0 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
0 Yes
R4 0
Waste
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
0 Yes
NO
(If in excess of WMP, or runoffentering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ...... . ..... t . .............................................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
;?(Yes
0 No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
ErNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
0 Yes
YNO
19,
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
El Yes
4"No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes
0 No
21.
Did Reviewernnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site . representative?
0 Yes
ET<0
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25.' Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No violaitions'or' deActenide's.we're- noted'during thisvisit.' Yo'U'Ihill receive no ftirthe ri,
Ofr6pbfiden6e about this. visit'..'-'.
Yes El No
❑ Yes Mo
Z_
El Yes qNo
El Yes 0
Y0,
A:
Comments'%,eis andlof i4 0
X Meconme. tier to quOtion'fl; ,Explain nny,i pp�% n"ei or anytother cilmments.
y
fir.
. . ........
Use in ttet -sitiWid, V 11 in _jeXp am
T_ T—I()Al bJ hte 0 A C-4zf -MrZ 77
FO 15, ��C C/A V6W
r3r,07
P� M-0 c-4 A) T*r-Z--,U D / s Tz ic, T_ C- CV)04, r t-7
d 7 PCW
LV
7125/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name rz 2 "vn l
Igw ow
ReviewerfInspector Signature: Date:
1.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 A--
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID FE H N
Boyce A. Hudson, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
August 3, 1995
Mr. A.J. Drake
Route 1 Box 360
Pinetops, NC 27864
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Drake Farms Swine Operation
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Drake:
On July 27, 1995, Mr. Ted Cashion from this office conducted
a compliance inspection of the subject facility. This inspection
is a part of the Division's efforts to determine potential problems
associated with waste disposal systems.
Mr. Cashion's site visit determined that wastewater from this
facility -was not discharging to the surface waters of the State.
Nor were any manmade pipes, ditches, or other prohibited
conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging wastewater)
observed.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facility operators. The Division of
Environmental Management is required to enforce water quality
regulations in order to protect the natural resources of the State.
Accordingly, illegal discharges of wastewater to surface waters of
the State are subject to the assessment of civil penalties, and may
also result in the loss of deemed permitted status, requiring
immediate submission of a waste management plan.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in
this matter. If you have any questions regarding your inspection
please call Mr. Cashion at 919-571-4700.
Sincerel ,
0
�dyarrett
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Edgecombe County Health Department
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facilities Assessment Unit
h:\animal\drake.ins
3800 Barrett Drive, suite 101, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer SM recycled/ 10% post-conaxner paper

JUL-14-1995 15 : 2b FREri OEM WCiTER UUNL t T' SECT [ CGN TO
PRO P. 02/02
Site Requires Immediate Atten6or- AL
Facility No. _ -:13-gb
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT'
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS S= VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address: eO,-
Counry: -ece-� '
Ji 0 p, n e .,,,- 41 C .,7 F f i T
Integrator: y Phone:
On Site ReDresentadve: - Phone:
Phvsical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: S.winnee Poultry Cattle
.1 � Design Capacity: 30 Nurnixrof Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Cerdfication Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 S% 0 Longitude: 3.f ' 3 Elevation: ____._Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the A— imal Waste Lagoon have sufficienr freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour siorm event
(approximately 1 Fast -t- 7 inches) CY-e3or No Actual Freeboard: —.Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or(: Was any erosion observed? Yes o 1 o
Is adequate land available for spray'? Ye or .No Is the cover crop adequate? &or No
Cmp(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings? � No
100 Feet from Wells? es X No
:e a-im-,J waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Strcam? Yes or�
a;umal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS t p Blue Line? Yes or 1 0
' animal waste discharged into waters of the state by inan-trade ditch, flushing system, or other
;ir^i!ar !ran-srt�t��e dc:�'ices'= 'Yes o if Y;:,,-. Please Expl:ian.
71, <N JIL: t:ic:ility ttiaintain adequate waste rnatiagGructit recurds (volumes of manure, land applied.
spray irrigated on spccific acreage with cover crop.0 Yes oi- No
dditioaal Corrilents: aoc� f
to', k5 as%
P� , Ih�oh
Signature
cc. Pwihi), Assessment Uru'L
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

.S.
I.S.
2
Ct
. lr�
31.123 A .
2
Q
RoeeRr
A.
s rA ro,v
I.S.
3560 9' U •
00 E
512. 49 30
56.26 S GG doL
f 25 EAS EN
C. ENIR OKER
s.Yz'
1, 6.24
40
0
8$9.87' 90.75 " wr •.Qs y.� ..:
s
N 69034' 23 W, 980.62
lei
1� H l�cgrc�r�
�` IpGq/`{�J HAL FA. PARKER / �` V ,
�se-r �O l
t A inQ �D�� 4/11.lyh,t�r��, f1Q�
d en QfoPer
BA
Ira
11-
te, �
o� y
d Gia 6y S 63026*43`W, 307.07'
i
3 per:
E.I.S. = EXISTING
I.S. = IRON STAK
FINAL
REG. NO. L-1316
PROPERTY OF
Al AA (lnln .1 nQ A VP7

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
'Soil Conservation Service
DESIGN DATA
Job Class_ Hazard Class
Watershed Area _ _.5�-�-,..._ acres Av. Slope
U %
Hydr. Soil trp Av.
Trickle Tube o. Pipe S illway De
Yr. Freq. in. Run
in.
Nign
DJention Stora Ac. Ft.
CFSEmergency
Sp. lway ignYr.
Fr q. Run
CFS
enL254ri r-A492 i5 rXn:e 12222riliz ,,// `
�1..,
r ANTI-S 11"FIS
Type;
No. require
D-�a�abl�
�ordt,�¢Klae
exe-a✓awa d
',�Fleu. -51 3. 0
f 't J 11
GEJERAL INFORMATION
Uses for Impounded Kater L, QQ D pL,
Area at Hormal Pool` _-Acres maLximum Depth feet
1�
capacity =
feet
,EARTH QUANTITIES J
Embankment /D 13¢ cu. yds.
Tr'ur
Excavation of Cutoff Trench cu. yds.
NC-ENG-13
b-83
- dB ILL, OFMATER I AL ed eLr,-.
�o4-w
CL i d ;.S4,JC red
30 0 o ZbA_
7 5
So
Excavation of strean Channel cu. yds.
Other Excavatior. - cu. yds.
!fir CS arnP � r— Q r /)P e cJ l��ii
T—
Total cu. yds. y�e)
/ Dam
.1OD �O \ _Max. age N.G.
0.
s
Ehtf2 Con of Out let '�
i d X J SS
Longitudinal section
Qunciruded Top of Dam-Add��' vot �eitierntni
�ellled lop a; Dorn— Uev.. -S .
Expa.ata 14.1q oicr — i_iay. 5/, "-
Zrid. 5}ag�48, p
7 r,d stoke. 4 8'. D ' e e
�se�pe��time�er Z
Ralurdl (wound Lker.
CERTIFICATION
I certify that I have made, or caused to be made, a final in-
spection of this pond project and that all work related there-
to has been completed in accordance with these plans and with
all.other applicable specifications except as listed on the
attached sheet.
(Check. here (= if no exceptions)
Top vdidih
1 / 96 � \
3, \
OA- off Cum �+l
Pipe Eftl­­
i z Sc 11 o!;t-
depends .d n ecb�, Q-�.�,rt+
Bench Mark Description Ta o /" is
Q`E Ouilcf box_ On,. S%Ct7 co R,
56.00
Ceoss section
PLAN OF l��ah
Aa r Ova k e-_ _ Ford
6G County, North Carolina
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Signed— Titlt Date dark out with red pencil those items not required.

t
r
ti
NC-ENG-SO
3/74 A) E
L4�ovN LR a.� �
NCua Laiaon uev \ !
s'aTnu \
`l
Egg Cl e
+
r
LOCATION SKETCH
280`X 6� /X 161 XW16'
Construct- Lagoon To:
Leh r ft.
Wi t tt.
Depth to ft.
Side Slopes-2,:i
Bent Support-"
(If Necessary)
LAGOON: -
Distance from nearest residence: I I 0_0 Soils:_
Type Lagoon:, aq r e b i C. Kind of Animals: 146a s .Number of Animal [:nits: - .6 ?4 k do
V Required Surface Area: Units x --- ft. 2/unit ft.2
Required Volume:3>.L13
E0 nits x� ft.3/unit : 1 dam.
27 ft." 3piCce,i f
Inlet: $K Diameter P V L Pipe or Concrete Trough; Bent Support SC i ,� i- r c.4C C
Outlet: 87" Diameter Q U C Pipe with Elbow or Tr*.
EFFLUENT HOLD NG PAD: j
f
I/ Volume Requ mants for Waste and Wash Wa r: als./day/animal x Animals
3
x day ( ins cycle) x a _ d.3
LAND DISPOSAL:
Land Area_ac.;. Application Rate in./hr.; Frequency of Application
FERTILIZATION & SEEDING RATES: (All Disturbed Areas)
Lime Dins [r J4cr Fertilizer_ 40001(is�Arc; Seed 70'14a ROA' Mulch 7 5 ,�A S rau R i( uuCr
or 1 n o/ti , FecGu e- -
/A C.
,'L o 16 s s w,e l! y:ai K,4G
Hof rpe- plo�K-*� L !i I.eUei P.1"tar'45 elev 4aO
' Maximum Q Cl To be spread on lop o E % e e t 4q- 0;;-
?�.! Water 5)- _ land when full
Minimum depth of Minimum EX..S+(W Construct Holding Pond To:
\ drater to be Length_�ft.
slaintalaed. 2.0 J Width 0 ft. 1 f t r �
LAGOON Depth /6r 4 ft.-�.-•.++�
i9194944UND Side Slope& 1 :1
Z V%d e
L nso0 n
NOTES:
1/ Pl a of onti It arou aboo an o i d well as b wee an ldin as us d?ptfi�bj
two b h e s at s a ea a fro ngo nd li ld po , t lia d v eta e.
r bra
3 re to--are--met.
asS/ All storm water should be diverted it at all possible; however, if this is not possible -it must be provided for in the
holding pond.
6/ %hen lagoon or holding pond is constricted using an embankment, use minimum top width, hide slopes, and freeboLrd as stated
in Engineering Standard 359. NC— ENG-13 may he used for embankment details).
p a..• lcdf��s
14f p
For Lnvout and Construction Check, see i_ner. Field Rook �, Page Z Z
LAGOON FOR ANIMAL. WASTE
Pd 1 D;- a k 1ram
Ed 4 G G Q "4 6 � _ County, N. C.
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Dole
--------
TWO.------- .--.- ----------
-?O -----------------------------------
idle__..-__._--.... --...._ _.
:�a'g Sweel I N.—I No
No
/0

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Drake Farms
Paul A Drake
626 NC 111 South
Pinetops, NC 27864
252-903-8274
03-02-2007
This plan has been developed by:
Margaret Knight
Edgecombe SWCD
201 St. Andrew Street
P0Box 10
Tarboro, NC 27886
252-641-7900
VC I
De eloper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
J, 4110
31 qh A -
Signature (owner) Date
A6Z 16 -) -
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: 3`0_-,.0 0 7
Technical Specialist Signature Date
-- ----- - ---------------- ------------------ - --------------------------------------------------- -
455167 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-02-2007 Cover Page 1
RECEIVED 1 DEN 1 DWQ
AQUIFFR-PRnTFr,T1nN SFCT10N
MAR 18 2009

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 1,566,630 gals/year by a 1,690
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
3608
Incorporated
6197
Injected
6824
Irrigated
3922
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
1 Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
3,922
6975
-3,053
2,786,044
-1,219,414
------------ -- --- -- 6-, -,----,--------- ----- -- - - - - -- --- -------------'- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source 1D, S means standard source, U means user defined source-
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-02-2007 Source Page Page I of 1

Narrative
When hay is harvested, nitrogen may be increased by 12.5 pounds per acre per ton of hay harvested up to
5.5 tons on Bermudagrass and 5 tons on fescue. Each ton thereafter, nitrogen may be increased to 50
pounds per ton.
.. ---------------- - ----- ------- - --
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-02-2007 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1626
1-1
2.40
1.80
NIA
Johns
Fescue Pasture
5.0 Tons
1626
1-2A
2.10
1.50
3.0
Johns
Fescue Pasture
5.0 Tons
1626
2-213
1.90
1.60
2.0
Kenansville
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1626
2-3
5.00
4.40
2.0
Kenansville
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1627
3-5
4.60
2.43
3.0
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1627
3-6
1.70
1.60
3.0
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1627
4-6A
1.80
1.70
3.0
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1627
4-7
5.00
4.90
3.0
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1627
4-8
2.70
2.50
3.0
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
1656
lA
5.50
2.50
2.0
Kenansville
Annual Ryegrass - Pasture
*4.0 Tons
Pearl Millett, Pasture
*5.0'1'ons
1656
1 B
3,671
2.00
2.0
Kenansville
Annual Ryegrass - Pasture
*4.0 Tons
Pearl Millett, Pasture
5.0 Tons
1656
2A
3.25
2.50
2.0
Kenansville
Fescue Pasture
*4.0 Tons
1656
2B
3.71
2.50
2.0
Kenansville
Fescue Pasture
*4.0 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 43.33 31.93
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/2/2007
PCS Page Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>— 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned,
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered.
> 10
Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term
No -Tilt (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers
(391).
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/2/2007
PCS Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

.The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbslA)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutfientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1626
1-1
S7
Johns
2.40
1.80
Fescue Pasture
5.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
162
0
0
Irrig.
162
64.71
0.00
116.48
0.00
1626
1-2A
S7
11ohns
2.10
1.50
Fescue Pasture
5.0 Tons
8/1-7131
162
0
0
Irrig.
162
64.71
0.00
97.06
0.00
1626
2-213
S7
Kenansville
1.90
1.60
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Ton
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
31.96
0.00
1626
2-213
S7
Kenansville
1.90
1.60
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*206
0
0
Irrig.
202
90.69
0.00
129.10
0.00
1626
2-3
S7
Kenansville
5.00
4.40
Small Grain Ovmccd
*3.0 Ton
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
87.88
0.00
1626
2-3
S7
Kenansville
5.00
4.40
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*206
0
0
Irrig.
202
80.69
0.00
355.02
0.00
1627
3-5
S7
Autryville
4.60
2.43
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Ton
1011-3131
1 50
0
0
1 Irrig.
50
19.971
0.00
48.53
0.00
1627
3-5
S7
Autryville
4.60
2.43
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*206
0
0
Irrig.
202
80.69
0.00
196.07
0.00
1627
3-6
S7
Autryville
1.70
1.60
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Ton
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.001
31.96
0.00
1627
3-6
S7
Autryville
1.70
1.60
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9130
*206
0
0
Irrig.
202
80.69
0.00
129.101
0.00
162.7
4-6A
S7
Autryville
1.80
1.70
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Ton
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
33.95
0.00
1627
4-6A
S7
Autryville
1.80
1.70
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*206
0
0
Irrig.
202
80.69
'0,00
137.17
0.00
1627
4-7
S7
Autryville
5.00
4.90
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Ton
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
97.86
0.00
1627
4-7
S7
Autryville
5.00
4.90
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9130
*206
0
0
Irrig.
202
80.69
0.00
395.37
0.00
1627
4-8
S7
Autryville
2.70
2.50
Small Grain Overseed
*3.0 Ton
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Itrig.
50
19.97
0.00
49.93
0.00
1627
4-8
S7
utryville
2.701
2.50
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*206
0
0
Irrig.
1 202
M691
0.00
201.72
0.00
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/2/2007 WUT Page Page 1 of 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Penod
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm,
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(1bs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure -
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
1656
IA
S7
Kenansville
5.50
2.50
Annual Ryegrass - Pasture
*4.0 Ton
*8115-5115
*150
0
0
Irrig.
44
17.58
0.00
43.94
0.00
1656
IA
S7
Kenansville
5.50
2.50
Pearl Millett, Pasture
*5.0Ton
4/1-9/15'
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
W69
0.00
201.72
0.00
1656
IB
S7
Kenansville
3.67
2.00
Annual Ryegrass - Pasture
*4.0 Ton
*8/15-5/15
* 150
0
0
Irrig,
44
17.58
0.00
35.15
0.00
1656
1 B
S7
Kenansville
3.67
2.00
Pear] Millett, Pasture
5.0 Tons
4/1-9/15
202
0
0
Irrig.
202
80.69
0.00
161.37
0.00
1656
2A
S7
Kenansville
3.25
2.50
Fescue Pasture
*4.0 Ton
8/1-7/31
*150
0
0
Irrig.
150
59.92
0.00
149.79
0.00
1656
2B
S7
Kenansville
3.7E
2.50
Fescue Pasture
*4.0 Ton
8/1-7/31
*150
0
0
Irrig.
55
21.97
0.00
54.92
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
2,786.04
'
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
1,566.63;'
Balance, 1000 gallons
-1,219,41
1;'.
Total Applied, tons
," : w
,
0,00
Total Produced, tons
r..
0.00
Balance, tonsk..
2.'i
o.0o
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol means ]eased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/2/2007 WUT Page Page 2 of 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
1626
1-1
Johns
0.50
1.0
1626
1-2A
Johns
0.50
1.0
1626
2-213
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1626
2-3
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1627
3-5
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1627
3-6
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1627
4-6A
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1627
4-7
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1627
4-8
Autryville
0.60
1.0
1656
IA
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1656
1B
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1656
2A
Kenansville
0.60
1.0
1656
1 2B
IKenansville
0.60
1.0
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 3/2/2007 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge
utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source,
the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for
sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of
copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water moving to streams and lakes,
phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
21.19
42.37
63.56
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
26.32
10.59
21.19
31.78
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
19.86
39.72
59.59
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -----••--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-02-2007 Sludge Page Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacitytable provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
12131
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
142
1
3
170
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
180
1
11
180
I
12
149
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end ofeach month.
- ------------------------------------------------------•------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-02-2007 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/2/2007 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
----------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/2/2007 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 3/2/2007 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): I-1, I-2A
Fescue: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Moderate to Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept. 1 to Oct. 15 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Tall fescue will tolerate soil wetness but not flooding or prolonged saturation; use
ladino clover for mixtures on these soils. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and
potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply
N for mixtures with clovers but use proper Iegume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2A, 2B
Fescue: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained
Adaptation: Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept. 1 to Oct. 15 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Tall fescue requires adequate soil moisture for persistence and production. Soil test
for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac
nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume
inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Ib/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each
window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in
North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------•--------------------------------
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-02-2007 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 2-2B, 2-3, 3-5, 3-6, 4-6A, 4-7, 4-8
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2-213, 2-3, 3-5, 3-6, 4-6A, 4-7, 4-8
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): IA, 113
Annual RyeGrass: This crop is not an overseed. Recommendations for this crop are not applicable to a
ryegrass overseed.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1A, I
Pearl Millett: No Comment
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
249314 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 03-02-2007 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2

r
Stafe of North -Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 12, 2000
Paul Drake
Drake Farms
Rt 2 Box 364
Pinetops NC 27864
1 •W'A
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS330026
Drake Farms
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Edgecombe County
Dear Paul Drake:
In accordance with your application received on March 11, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Paul Drake, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. This
approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of
animal waste from the Drake Farms, located in Edgecombe County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than 1690 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS330026
Drake Farms
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Don Friday at [phone] ext. 533.
'G�
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Edgecombe County Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina RECEIVED
Department of Environment and Natural Resources WATER QUpLITY SECTION
Division of Water' Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form 1 1999
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operajoli&harse Permitting
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division.- Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are`;appropriate. Ua
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as p`ssible. ,o not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION: ' l
1.1 Facility Name: Drake Farms ._ 1
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: &a,u{ A ,
1.3 Mailing address: $OA-Bex-3frq'-�- _ 36 Y\\
City, State: Pineto s NC Zip: 27864
Telephone Number (include area code): 919-827-2529
1.4 County where facility is located: Edgecombe ^
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): take hwy. 43 N. out of Pinetops turn right at first
crossroad outside of city limits (Sacatoga Rd) go .4 mile on Saratago Rd. and turn left onto gravel drive 1500 foot off the
road. 1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): AL(L bra- k'e—_
1.7 Lessee's Integrator's nam (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): _8&rLar ��C.rrin 5
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/78
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): �,zo1Sa r- %Ja_
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 33 (county number); _26 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descris pnSwine operation
Feeder to Finish
1690- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; no. if no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number Ior which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder O.Layer 0 Dairy
6'Iseeder to Finish 7-D 0 Non -Layer 9-Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 33 - 26

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 30.00 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 12
2.4 Number of agoon storage ponds (circle which is applicable): 3
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO lease circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO lease circle one)
2,7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
ES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? /11/79 a-9 J. 2�� Zyo
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? � /
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space
provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
�� n
cJ
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
n�
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Apimal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
—3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
.3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
—3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
—3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
—3-3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3�3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, oHMzard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 33 - 26

RECEIVED
WATER QoNgy GFCT ION
Facility Number: 33 - 26
Facility Name: Drake Farms
MAR 1 1 1999
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: Nan -Discharge Perr60119
( A rg (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for _ m �,e_ 4Lt-yw S (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge,, I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature A—,, 1 4 , 0 —e Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
im
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 33 - 26

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(iNd&d aalr 1t •ddltloXAl 1Jtld has to 8e 10890d, •ta.)
hereby give Q212a
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on 7-0 F acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date: i o (,
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative: �� Date: .2 3J J
SWCD Representative: MDate: —�ICV14�
Term of Agreement: _ ^ �fl ,Fb _ 9_ to / f v-,ZUC 20,
(Ntnianus 94 Tan roars an Cost Shared Ztans)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
0

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 5, 2000
PAUL DRAKE
DRAKE FARMS
RT 2 SOX 364
PINETOPS NC 27864
IT,IT F wow
1 • •
AF
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS330026
Additional Information Request
Drake Farms
Animal Waste Operation
Edgecombe County
Dear Paul Drake:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by June 4, 2000;
I have received the updated copy of the Waste Utilization Plan (WUP). The new (WUP) needs to signed
and dated by the owner and technical specialist. Also, please provide a copy of the lease agreement with the
appropriated signatures.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before June 4, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 533.
Sincerely,
Donald Friday
Environmental Technician
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

4r
.a %
4i -ym
'WA
lit
.a %
4i -ym
'WA
lit

ANIMAL WASTE HANAGM-9:IT P?,AN CERTIFICATION FOR EZISTING FEEDLOTS
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Hanagement at
the address on the reverse aide of this fo=.
Name of farm (Pleage, print): A.
r ��
Mailing Address: s
Phone o. -
County (of farm):
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:_ /_ _ (required). Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, et ) :-Lu. '+n e_
Design capacity (number of animals): / 6_ D - __
Average size of operation 12 month o ulation av
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres):
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F 000S, I certify that the
existing animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal
waste management plan that meets the operation and maintenance standards and
specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil
Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation
Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements and their corresponding minimum criteria have been verified
by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as
applicable: minimum separations (buffers); adequate quantity and amount of land
for waste utilization (or use of third party); access or ownership of proper
waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application
rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from
stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-fyyear),124-hour, storm.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print) :, A
Affiliation (Agency) N
Address: r- �° t %� X �Q ��/�/e%LC/� �� Phone No. F� �- 7f,: LJ
Signature: �.0 yLC� �J Date: Z
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will
require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state either directly through a man-made conveyance or through runoff .from a
storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will
be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation
District.
Name of Land Owner ((Please Print) : ' ,f.J) , -4 �.� I �r_._k'"
Signature: A ri`�� Oc��
. 1 ,��.��.� s , _- A.�.t �+� Date: /%l.�
_
Name of Hanager, if different from owner (Please print): Qu l A, Lair
-
Signature:" Date :-
ote: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) within.60 days of a title transfer.-
DEM USE ONLY: ACE#

i+
Re v; $ ad
ANIMAL WASTE UTIL12ATION PLAN
Producer:
Location:
Telephone:
Type Operation:
Number of Animals:
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE:
APPLICATION METHOD:
PAUL DRAKE
ROUTE 1 BOX 364
PINETOPS NC 27864
252-827-2529
Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
1690.00 hogs
Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
Irrigation
RECEIVED
WATER QUAL"SECTION
MAY 2 s 20uu
Non -Discharge pe►mitUng
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
-ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan -is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1690 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 3211 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER,YEAR
1690 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 3887 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
1
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
1626
1-1
Jo
FP
3.2
120
1.8
216
I
SEP-APR
1626
1-2A
JJO
_[1626
2-2B
KeB
1626
-2-2B
KeB
626
2-3
lKeB
1626 1-2-
WA
I
BP
I
WA
I
3.2 1120
4.1 1153.75
2.5 175
4.1 1153.
2.5 175
1.5
1180
SEP-APR
1.6
1246
APR-SEP
1120
1.6
SCP- MAR
4.4
1676.5
APR-SEP
330
4.4
Sc-P--Mar
I Ir � iI I I I I I
TOTAL11768.5
-- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: \ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
1627
3-5
AuB
WA
3.0
90
2.43
218.7
.3C P - Pi ffl.
1627
3-5A JAUB
IWA
3
190 1
.4
136
SCE- M
1627
3A-5
JAUB
SA
3
1112.5 1
12.43
1273.375
RpR- uc
527
3A-5A
AuB
SA
3
1112.5 1
1.4
145
APR -A c
1627
3-6
JAUB
IWA
3
190 1
11.6
1144
SEP- MA
1627
3A-6
SA
3
1AuB
1112.5 1
11.6
1180
APR-AUG
1627
4-6A
BP
4.1
1AuB
1153-751
11.7
1261.375
APR-SEP
1627
-4-6A
AuB
WA
2.5
175
11.7
1127.5
SEP-MAR
1627
4-7
BP
4.1
1AuB
1153.751
14.9
1753.375
APR-SEP
1627
-4-7
WA
2.5
JAuB
_]_153.75
1.75
14.9
1367.5
SEP-MAR
1627
4-8
AuB
415.125
rP
14.1
12.7
1 APR-SEP
1627
--4-8
2.5
1AuB
IWA
175 1
12.7
1202.5
SEP-MAR
END
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TOTAL 3024.45
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer
annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for
nitrate levels is recommended.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BP
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE
TONS
37.5
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
TONS
37.5
SA
SUMMER ANNUALS (I.E. Sorghum -Sudan Hybri
37.5
WA
WINTER ANNUALS (I.E. Small Grains, etc.)
30
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
9.3
1768.5
18.16
3024.45
27.46
4792.95
* BALANCE
-905.95
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN.
1-1
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page:

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 625.3 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 3126.5
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 10.4216666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 25.012 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water -holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
I
(Application
RatelApplic. Amount
Tract
l Field l
i
Soil Type
l Crop
i
l (in/hr)
I
(inches)
I
1626
l 1-1 l
I *1
Jo
I FP
l .5
1626
1 I
j 1-2A l
I
!
l .5
I *1
Jo
l FP
1626
l I
2-2B l
I
I
I
I *1
KeB
l BP
l .6
1626
I i
l 2-3 I
I
I
I .6
I
l *1
KeB
I BP
1626
I
l --2-2B I
i
I
.6
I
l *1
KeB
I WA
1626
I I
l --2-3 I
I
I
I
l *1
KeB
I WA
I .6
1627
I I
l 3-5 l
I
I
.6
I
l *1
AuB
I WA
1627
I I
l 3-5A I
I
I
I
*1
AuB
I WA
l .6
1627
i
l 3-6 l
i
I
l .6
I
l *1
AuB
l WA
.627
I I
I 3A-5 l
I
I
l .6
I
l *1
AuB
l SA
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
1627
1
I 3A--5A
AuB
1
SA
1
I .6
1
1 *1
1627
I I
I 3A--6 I
AuB
I
I SA
I
I .6
I
I *1
1627
I 1
1 4-6A I
AuB
I
I BP
I
.6
I
I *1
1627
I�I
1 4-7
AuB
I
I BP
I
I .6
I *1
1627
I
14-8 I
AuB
1
BP
I .6
*1
1627
I I
1 -4-6A I
AuB
I
1 WA
I
I .6
l
*1
1627
1 I
' -4-7 I
AuB
I
I WA
I
.6
1 *1
1627
I I
I --4-8 I
1
AuB
I
I WA
I
I
1 .6
I
I
I *1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the.crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 120.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
4.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Bermudagrass Pasture
All bermudagrass pastures are managed as a grazing system. Any excess grass
may be harvested as hay.
Apply 37.5 pounds of nitrogen prior to grazing, then apply 37.5 pounds after
each grazing period or hay cutting until the end of August. Do not exceed
155 pounds of nitrogen per year per acre unless hay is cut from pasture.
When hay is harvested, nitrogen may be increased by 12.5 pounds per acre
per ton of hay harvested up to 4.1 tons. Each ton thereafter nitrogen may
be increased to 50 pounds per ton.
Bermudagrass pasture overseeded with rye
Rye should be drilled in short (3-5 inches tall) bermudagrass stubble before
October 15 at the rate of 1 - 2 bushels per acre. Rye will be managed as
a grazed system. Apply 38.5 pounds of nitrogen for rye growth between
September 15 and October 31. An additional 38.5 pounds of nitrogen may be
applied to rye in February and March. If rye is cut for hay, an
additional 12.5 pounds of nitrogen may be applied per acre for each ton of
hay harvested. Either cut rye for hay or close graze prior to heading or
April 7, so as not to impede bermudagrass growth. Do no exceed 100 pounds
of nitrogen per acre if cut for hay.
Fescue Pasture
Fescue is a cool season perennial. Manage waste application to provide maximum
growth during these periods. Apply waste in Spring (Feb -Apr) and Fall
(Sept -Nov). Apply waste before Fall and Spring grazing periods and after
each grazing cycle. Do not exceed 120 pounds of nitrogen per acre per
year unless hay is harvested. An additional 12.5 pounds of nitrogen may
be added for each ton of hay harvested up to 3.2 tons. Each ton
thereafter.nitrogen may be increased to 50 pounds per ton.
llet
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Millet is a summer annual. Plant
Waste may be applied prior to
to 50 pounds of nitrogen. At
of nitrogen at a rate of 38.5
harvesting at a height of 12
tall and apply 38.5 pounds of
grazing periods from June to
nitrogen per acres unless ha
nitrogen may be added for eac
ton thereafter nitrogen may
Rye
in May at a rate of 20 - 30 pounds per acre.
planting and incorporated into the soil up
6 to 8 inches tall, apply second application
pounds of nitrogen. Begin grazing or
to 14 inches. Rotate cattle off at 6 inches
nitrogen each grazing. You can expect 4 - 5
September. Do not exceed 115 pounds of
y is harvested. An additional 12.5 pounds of
h ton of hay harvested up to 3 tons. Each
be increased to 50 pounds per ton.
Rye is a winter annual. Seed rye in September at a rate of 1.6 bushels per
acre. Waste may be applied prior to planting. Apply 50 pounds of
nitrogen at planting and incorporate into soil., When rye is 5 - 10 inches
tall, a second application may be applied. Grazing may begin at 15 - 16
inches tall. After each grazing period, additional nitrogen may be
applied. Do not exceed a total of 90 pounds of nitrogen for entire crop.
An additional 12.5 pounds of nitrogen may be added for each ton of hay
harvested up to 3 tons. Each ton thereafter nitrogen may be increased to
50 pounds per ton.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REOUIRED__SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who -is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste'Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (see "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
-;to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which .waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site'by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged .into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon -areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 13

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a""closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct'human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -- determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing -design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no'
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year; 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: PAUL DRAKE
(Please print)
Signature: o, Date:
Name of Manager (If different from owner) : ��� �, ors 4,e-
Signature: A,,Q Date: ,� f
Name of Person Preparing Plan:
Affiliation:EDGECOBME SWCD
Address (Agency): P O BOX 10
(Please print)MARGARET KNIGHT
Phone No. 919-641-7900
TARBORO INC 27886-0010
Signature: O-B.G2� Date: l
Page: 15

R ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acre's of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative: Date:
SWCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
OU, Y'Cr-J1'a4-\
ok\ ?moo Z VL".s pe*)
Page: 16

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and'acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
. 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 17

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (533),-or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver: Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
. 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: 18

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Producer: l7Al}L. t>epkC—_
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out the
routine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine waste
management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance is
considered to be normal good care of the system. Good maintenance adds
to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and side
slopes: kkkh AeA&S _ ' is being
established on these areas. Beginning in'199`7 and each year
thereafter, the embankment should be fertilized with 800 pounds
of 10-10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be done
by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of all three.
This will need to be done at least once each year and possibly
twice in years favorable to heavy growth of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the
initial filling of the lagoon and at least annually. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the fallowing:
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, overflow Pipes
a. condition of pipes
(1) separation of joints
(2) cracks or breaks
2. Pool Area
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability — slumps or bulges
C. erosion and rodent damage
4. Transfer Pump
i

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
B. Operation
Your animal waste'management facility was designed for a total of
1, &90 sows (. to :%,4)sK ) • The lagoon contains both
permanent and.temporary storage. The permanent storage is not to be
pumped in order to ensure that anaerobic action will occur. The
design includes permanent storage of one cubic foot per pound of
steady state live weight.
The temporary storage portion o,f,the lagoon includes capacity for the
volume of waste produced over ldo days, the amount of rainfall in a
25 year 24 hour storm event, and rainfall in excess of evaporation.
Your facility is designed for lao days of temporary storage;
therefore, it will need to be pumped every Pwc months. Begin pump -
out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches elevation y6,v as marked
by permanent markers. Stop pump -out when the fluid level reaches
elevation
The attached waste management plan should be followed. This plan
recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B) before
land application. The waste material should be analyzed before each
application cycle to determine its nutrient content. A soil test of
the area of application should be made annually to insure the waste
is applied as reasonably and practically possible to recommended
rates.
It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre -charged
to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during start-up. Pre -
charging reduces the concentration of the initial waste entering the
lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be covered with
effluent at all times.
..The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of pollutants
into waters of the United States. The Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Management,
has the responsibility for enforcing this law.
9

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Sriurec Cause )IMPS to Couh•nl Insects Site Sperrrre Practices
Liquid Sysicuts
F111511 Clutters + Accinitulatiou of solids 0 Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove acctmtulatcd solids from
gutters as designed.
❑ Remove bridging; of accumulated solids pt
discharge
Lagoons and fits Cnisled Solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where F14.s 4 &o. it c---de4
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth Of nD 1110re than 6 -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface. -
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation _ Maintain vegetative control along hanks of Ce�,f we.e-dh r yr % G ►.,,.,.yClc,
t irowth higoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation ofdecaying vegetative platter
along waters edge on impouuclnlenI's perimeter.
my Syslents
l ce,lcra • Feed Spillage a Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage. &mil faG,[tc� ,•e(J
(2r' Clean tip spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval during summer, 15-30 day interval
tl ing winter).
Feed Siwaue Accuninlations of feed residues I2ecluee moisture acetnnrdation within a1111
aromid inunediate: perimeter of Iced storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
antl/or providing adequate containniew (c.g.,
covered his for brewers grain and simikir high
ioisture grain products).
01 1iispect liar and remove nr break tip ,iccumulated
solids in lifter strips around Cecil stomg;c as
ttecdecl.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page I

Source Cause I11NPs to Control Insects. Site Specific 11'raelices
Animal I Ioldileg Areas Accumulations of animal wastes 0 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and Feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
O Maintain fence rows and Glter'strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (Le_, inspect for and
remove or break tip accumulated solids as
neetled).
Dry hlanure [ laIldling Accumulations of animal wastes 0 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Systeuns day interval during summer; I5-30 day inicrval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
O Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
Ll Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
I=nr Inure in1brination contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Deparinent of Entomology, [lox 7613, North Carolina State University,
Italcigh, NC, 27695-7613.
Ahllt.; - November 11, 1996, Page 2

I
Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Swine production 0 Vegetative or wooded buffers;
C1 Recommended best management practices;
Q Good judgment and common sense
Animal body:surfaces
•
Duty manure -covered animals
F1 Dry floors
Floor surfaces_
•
Wet manure -covered floors
ef, Slotted floors; '
Waterers located over slotted floors;
D Feeders at high end of solid floors;
0" Scrape manure buildup from floors;
B Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits
6
Urine;
GrFrequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
•
Partial microbial decomposition
or scrape;
O3rfUnderfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans
•
Volatile gases;
Fan maintenance;
Dust
90"'1;fficient air movement
Indoor surfaces
•
Dust
Washdown between groups of animals;
O Feed additives;
O Feeder covers;
9-Teed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers
Flush tanks '
•
Agitation of recycled lagoon
0 Flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling
O Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys
•
Agitation during wastewater
fg-'-Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation
Conveyance 1
i
Pit recharge points
•
Agitation -of recycled lagoon
D Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits
liquid while pits are filling
with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations
Agitation during sump tank
C l- Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
Outside drain collection
•
Agitation during wastewater
ox covers
or junction boxes
conveyance
AMOC -November 11, 1996, Page 3

Source
Cause
DMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
End of drainpipes at +
Agitation during wastewater
❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces •
Volatile gas emissions;
Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
•
Biological mixing;
A'lCorrect lagoon startup procedures;
•
Agitation
❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
Minimum agitation when.pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
CL•,Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler •
High pressure agitation;
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind; .
nozzles .
Wind drift
❑ Minimum recommended operating pressure;
C'J"Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
I!Pump from second -stage lagoon
Storage tank or basin .
Partial microbial decomposition;
❑ Bottom or midlevel loading;
surface •
•
Mixing while filling;
Agitation when emptying
❑ Tank covers;
❑ Basin surface mats of solids;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface •
Partial microbial decomposition;
❑ Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
•
Mixing while filling;
level;
❑ Remove
. •
Agitation when emptying
settled solids regularly i
Manure, starry or sludge •
Agitation when spreading;
❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets .
Volatile gas emissions
❑ Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
1
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, •
Volatile gas emissions while
❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field
drying
❑ Soil incorporation within 48 ttrs.;
surfaces
❑ Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals .
Carcass decomposition
roper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal •
Carcass decomposition
❑ Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
pits
❑ Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators „ `� P' lncom
AT,Arff November 11, 1996, Page 4
❑ Secondary stack burners

Source Cause BM1's to Mfit mice Odor Site Specific Praclices
Standing water around 6 Improper drainage; Grade and landscape such that water drains %h
facilities A Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracktal onto 4b Poorly maintained access roads 49KFarm access road maintenance
public roads firom farm
access
Additional Information : Available From :
Swine Mantire- Management ; 0200 ltule/BMP Packet NCSl.1, County I mcnsion Center
Swine Production Vanu Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSIJ - IIAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Itec11arge - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 128-88 NCSIJ - IIAII
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE I29-88 NCSIJ - 13AI:
Lagoou Design anti Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; E-BAfi 103-83 NCSI I - BA1i
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment ; CBAE Fact Sheet NCSIJ - IIAI?
Comrolhng Odors front Swine Buildings ; PH 1-33 NCSU - Switic Extension
Environmental Assurance Program ; NIIPC Manual NC Pork Producers Assoc
OlUions for Managing Odor; a repnri from the Swine Odor Task Force NCSU Atari Cmmimnicatinns
Nnis:mce Cmicerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors anti Flies ; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florkh t.`onper:uive ItKten5i0il
Y
AMOC - NovcInber 11, 1996. Page 5

Mortality Nlanagement 1•lethods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
:.1 Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
....i Renderinb at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal,pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of P,pg culture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919-571 - 4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919-641 7843
SWCD 919-641-7900
NRCS 919-641-7900
Z.
r
This plan will,. be _;implemented in the event that wastes from
your operation are:ieaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You`should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave yaur-...property to consider that you have a problem.
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. The followin? are some action items you should
take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
C. Stop all additional flow to the lagoon.
d. call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no.surface water is entering -lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field- actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to.reduce runoff.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation -pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump:
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.

E:_ Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ
(Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone
919-571-4700. After hours, emergency number: 919-
733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of
the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-'641-7843•
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919- 641- 7915, local SWCD
office phone number 919-641-7900, and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919-641--7900.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask that
person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damag .
a. Contractors Name: Q
b. Contractors Adress:
C. Contractors Phone: vA7- ssc,�

J
. 6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: A --6 w 4-k tiv Tts` C NYfzcs- _
b . Phone: U LA V --7 `) 00
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.
•
r]
L

Wpr.± 27 99 1 1 : 33a USDA-NRES 919-641 -7902 p. 1
Attention: Ms. Dianne Thomas
Company: DWQ
Fax Number: 89195714718
Voice Number:
From: USDA-NRCS
Company: Edgecombe SWCD
Fax Number: 9-641-7902
Voice Number:,,,,, 94<641-7900
Sub�� &,yised-Waste Management-Pla za
Date: 4/27/99
Number of Pages: 1
Please accept this waste management plan in place of the one
previously submitted for Paul Drake's operation (Facility Number
33-26). La

ANOw
f r USD€1-MRCS 919-641--7902 P• 3
33a
i
f ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
F. �PG aces : PAUL DRAKE
L( :a tioz : ROUTE 1 BOX 364
PINETOPS NC 27864
TE .e-..hom i.: 252-827-2529
T3 1e ope i-ation: Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
Nt ib:.ir o I' Animals: 1690.00 hogs
(D ;i .ju CE ;?acity)
S3 X`.GE :�TRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
AP L`: CAT -'ON METHOD: Irrigation
Th +astc from your animal facility must be land applied at a
sp c-£ied rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
gr aidwai.er. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to rtducc the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in t_1a f=elds where the waste is to be applied.
Th i; :waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Wa; :�f shcsld be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
te: ,fi are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
ba.irzed Eor realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Se,>r.tl factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
pli i in c:-der to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
en:ir.i that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
Always apply waste based.on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials,'cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
to tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
1. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen.. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Pace!

11:33a USDA -MRCS 919-641-7902 P-4
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
Tr s plai is based on the waste application method shown above. If
yc hoo::e to change methods in the future, -you need to revise this
pl n N.trient levels for different application methods are not the
sa e
Th stiiated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
ty .ii al nutrient content for this .type of facility. Acreage
re ti:rem(-nts should be based on the waste analysis report from your
wa ti management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
an l]sis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Pr v_:siois shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so 3E to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Li:, must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
cr, a :roc Yction.
Th: ; aasta utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
foi c;,mpl*Lance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Mal ig-amer. = Commission.
AXOt'AT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
16' _r :iogE x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 3211 tons
AMCIJNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
16!) :iogE x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 3887 lbs. PAN/year
Apl ,y _ng 1_he above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
tin . Lnd lave appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
mar .e -.
The f-.Jlo.,i.ng acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the c-op :.o be grown, soil type and surface application.

11:34a USDR-NRCS - -
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
LD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER ACi
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
Jo
FP
3.2
120
1.8
216
I
SEP-APR
1 26.-2,k Jo
1,26 - 2-211 KeB
1 26 _ :-2-.:B KeB
1 2G 2-3 KeB
FP
I
3.2 120
4.1✓ 1153.
I WA 12 . 5' 1 7 5 1
1- KeB IWA 12.5175
I
END
�I
I-
ISEP-APR
1.6
1246
APR-SEP
1120
1.6
4.4
676.5
APR-SEP
1330
4.4
SEP-Ingp-
TOTAL11768.5
-- - Inda^ates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
Lntecplanted) or winter annuals fol]ow summer annuals.
NOT'.: "he applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
.rhil!a meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
..lay i-equire farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
iutr:_ent management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
�:ilan only addresses nitrogen.'
Pane- �

USDA-NRC5
919-641-7902
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
;27 I3
p.6
LD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METI1
N
TIME
^'
AuB
WA
3.0
9 011"_
2.43
218.7
uB
3
D "I tl WE
.4 36
1>27
3A-5
AuB SA
3
112.5
273.375
'
12.43
A Ply_ u G
1 .27
3A— .iA
AuB 11K
SA J�r1112.5
I
1.4
145
� PR -�uU-
1 27
3-6
AuB
WA
3
90
1.6
1144
5 P- M ¢f
1 27
3A-:
AUB1SA
3
112 Jr11.6
i
1180
APR-AUG
4-6,
AUB B
4.1
153.75 V
11.7
1261.375
APR-SEP
1r 27
74-('.A
AuB
WA
V 75
12.5
11.7.
1127.5
SEP-MAR
1e'27-7
AUB P
4.1
153.75
4.9
1753.375
APR-SEP
1C'7
v 4 AUB WA
2.5
75
4.9
1367.5
SEP-MAR
16 7
F-a AuB BP
V.1�r53.7�
12.7
1415.125
APR-SEP
16 '7
�4-$ AUB WA 2.5t
1202.5
75
2.7
T END
SEP-MAR
Pacre : d

f1:34a USDR-MRCS 919-B41-7902 p. 7
ANIMAL WASTE UTILI2ATION PLAN
1
TOTAL 3024.45
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
whiter annuals follow summer annuals.
caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer
znnuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
nsy occur in livestock. sampling forage or hay for
ritrate levels is recommended.
*Acr!�age figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
ove rseeding.'
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
les:c any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
Tr :.:oll.wing legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
ROP O; 'E CROP
BP HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE
FP TALL FESCUE -PASTURE `
SA SUMMER ANNUALS (I.E. SU4- udan Hybri
WA WINTER ANNUALS (I.E. Small Grains, etc.)
TA;3LE 1
TA :3LE 2
TO .'AL
**
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
9.3
1768.5
18.16
3024.45
27.46
4792.95
* BALANCE
-905.95
ITS
TONS
TONS
---- --------------
}** ';his number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
5;101*14K_@k1M
37.5
37.5
37.5,
30 ,
Pacre s R

99 i i : 35a
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
* * Th.s number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
ut.lize-the animal waste N produced.
A ri:s sl+awn in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
u al -le acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
o d arei.s unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
f 1'. application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
a rus il. the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
t i� scrEs shown in the tables.
S. ittzzhed map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
a: i n -11 '� qLste.
SLl )G`, AF.?LICATION:
Th( w.tste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
apj .i:.-ati.)n of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
ric, -':-tnd .iill require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of iu:.rie-its or other elements. Your production facility will produce
apg -o::ima,:ely 625.3 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
s1L .g
If a... retove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 3126.5
Pau d- of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
ber u-.agr-:.ss hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
wil :-:eed 10.4216666667 acres of land. if you apply the sludge to corn at
the rr}te :f 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 25.012 acres
of a)-d. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
Ian i-eedcd. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
slu g( wa::te analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
met o<: s .
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The Lr iga::ion application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soi: a:-- tL,a time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rato i limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
text jr-i, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
shoe .d not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
timE o" irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
;..he i i '::rog man needs of the crop.
If E .r:`ace irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it i s-.he :•esponsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that a.--: irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shoes. n T:.bles 1 and 2. failure to apply the recommended rates and
Pans: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
am a).ts i.f nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Th :olli:wing table is provided as a guide for establishing application
ra anc . amounts.
I
(Application
RatelApplic. Amount
7:•act .i.
Tield I
Soil Type
Crop
j (in/hr)
I (inches)
1126
._-1 I
Jo
I FP
( .5
I *1
1 26
..-2A I
Jo
FP
I .5
j *1
1426
:°-2B
KeB
I BP
I .6
I *1
1E 26
:.-3 I
KeB
I BP
I .6
I f1
1E 26
- 2-21 I
KeB
I WA
I .6
I *1
16 6
-.'-3 I
KeB
I WA
I .6
I *1
16 7 1
3._5 I
AuB
I WA
I .6
I *1
16.7 1
3- 5A I
AuB
I WA
I .6
I *1
16: 7 1
3-6 I
AuB
I WA
I .6
*1
16; 7 I
31 -5 I
AuB
I SA
I .6
I *1
Paa a a a

Rr-1,35a USDA -MRCS 919-641-7902 P•11
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
627
3A-: �A i
{ *1
AuB
i SA
I . 6
527
3A-( +
f .6
I *1
AuB
{ SA
3 S27
4-6F I
+ .6,
i *1
AuB
I BP
1:027
4-7 {
I .6
I *1
AuB
BP
l 127
1-8 f
! .6
! *1
AuB
I BP
1 27
--4-6 I
! .6
I *1
AuB
i WA
1- 27
4 -7 I
f .6
I *1
AuB
! WA
D 27
4-8 I
{ .6
I *1
AuB
f WA
this is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
-assLning the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
-ipplied_ In many situations,'the application amount shown cannot
:.)e z.,3plied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
::application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
.::ond Ltions .
Yot • .,`aci -ity is designed for 120.00 days of temporary storage and
the tr�tmpoi*ary storage must be removed on the average of once every
4.0 ILontis. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
] in o.r s::ructure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foc ..,f f:eeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.

919-641-7902 p•12
11:36a USDA-NRCS
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I s the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
e si..re 'hat the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
c ri ect rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
t ,Y .recc,mmended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
m kc: the s plan invalid.
C. 11 yotr technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
r. :)crt ]:)r assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
t] aroEar application rate prior'to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Be :•mudi ; r . iss :?asture
Al _ bei iu .lagr -iss pastures are managed as a grazing system. Any excess grass
me , :)e h'tirvested as hay.
Ap:-ly '' pounds of nitrogen prior to grazing, then apply 37.5 pounds after
ez :h gra::ing period or hay cutting until the end of August. Do not exceed
I!- :)ounls of nitrogen per year per acre unless hay is cut from pasture.
Wr :n hay is harvested, nitrogen may be increased by 12.5 pounds per acre
pE- .on :)f hay harvested up to 4.1 tons. Each ton thereafter nitrogen may
bE i :cre :.sed to 50 pounds per ton.:
Be: muda r-i ss )asture overseeded with rye
Rye sho lc be drilled in short (3-5 inches tall) bermudagrass stubble before
Oc o],er '.5 at the rate of 1 - 2 bushels per acre. Rye will be managed as
a r�!zed system. Apply 38.5 pounds of nitrogen for rye growth between
Se tciubei 15 and October 31. An additional 38.5 pounds of nitrogen may be
ap.?.4ad to rye in February and March. If rye is cut for hay, an
ad..�tionzl 12.5 pounds of nitrogen may be applied per acre for each ton of
ha: harvested. Either cut rye for hay or close graze prior to heading or
Ap:i_1 7, 3o as not to impede bermudagrass growth. Do no exceed 100 pounds
of -d _roc ?n per acre if cut for hay.
Fey :ue ] cure
Fes-.ue :; t cc:)l season perennial. Manage waste application to provide maximum
grcTt:i during these periods. Apply waste in Spring (Feb --Apr) and Fall
(SE ;t -Nov', . Apply waste before Fall and spring grazing periods and after
eac:Iraz:_ng cycle. Do not exceed 120 pounds of nitrogen per acre per
yeF Lnle,.s hay is harvested. An additional. 12.5 pounds of nitrogen may
be dJed. i'or each ton of hay harvested up to 3.2 tons. Each ton
thE'e.fte nitrogen may be increased to 50 pounds per ton.
Mil et
Paqe: 10

a usDR-NRCS 919-641-7902 p.13
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Mallet .i: a summer annual. Plant in May at a rate of 20 - 30 pounds per acre.
W sie miy be applied prior to planting and incorporated into the soil up
t '0 p(unds of nitrogen. At 6 to 8 inches tall, apply second application
o r.itr(gen at a rate of 38.5 pounds of nitrogen.- Begin grazing or
h� -N,asting at a height of 12 to 14 inches. Rotate cattle off at 6 inches
t,Ll ane apply 38.5 pounds of nitrogen each grazing. You can expect 4 - 5
g:42Lng periods from June to September. Do not exceed 115 pounds of
n.`r:)ger per acres unless hay is harvested. An additional 12.5 pounds of
n: .x�ger may be added for each ton of hay harvested up to 3 tons. Each
tc j 7hex,2after nitrogen may be increased to 50 pounds per ton.
Ry, , is i ,int ar annual,. Seed rye in September at a rate of 1.6 bushels per
ac'e.. Waste may be applied prior to planting. Apply 50 pounds of
ni.r)gen at planting and incorporate into soil. When rye is 5 - 10 inches
tz 1. a ::econd application may be applied. Grazing may begin at 15 - 16
it h-:s t:.11. After each grazing period, additional, nitrogen may be
aF l-ed. Do not exceed a total of 90 pounds of nitrogen for entire crop.
An a-idit.onal 12.5 pounds of nitrogen may be added for each ton of hay
ha vm::ste-. up to 3 tons. Each ton .thereafter nitrogen may be increased to
50 p. .und:: per ton.
Paae: 11

a USDA-NRCS
919-641-7902
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
I. k imal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
di:,charge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
p.14
2. TI.ere must be documentation.in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
lari on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
rez-3onable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
the:_e is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
ani;nals, method of utilization, or available land.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nit;7ogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
ava.lable moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
lev>1 of -management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre:per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
pro-.-iding grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
Odi.rs can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danrier of drift from the irrigation field.
Whc:n animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
Elo(ding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
crolland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
3oe_ not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
-and 31imate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
Lieaid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
.LnfaLtration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
_urface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
.he kite during application. No ponding should occur in order
..o c:)ntrol odor or flies.
E Anizal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
.-ainl'all events, or when the surface is frozen.
S Aniial waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
ma,ner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
,oul:. inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
'.-ast should also be considered.
Page: 12
r,

3Ga USDR-MRCS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICAT_IONS
1".. w,Iste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leeching. waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
he:.d to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
tale up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
thin 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
do3 mancy..
]. Ary new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
cornoly with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
ont3 which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a wine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
prt,:)erty boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
tha.1 an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swi.ie waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(Se:� Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
.2. An.;-mal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wel._s.
3.. An-_mal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwe:.lings other than those owned by the landowner.
4.. Wa:;te shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
5 An mal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
dra nageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
the; have been approved as a land application site by a
"te;:hnical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
gra:;sed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agri ,nomi.c rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
-the site.
S. Dorestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
:3ho,vars, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
anin31 waste management system.
7. A it-otective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
.3stpalished on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
Sipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
orot,�ct the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
)the:- woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
-Appr:)priate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
..serm:a and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
-,f ei.-osion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 13

:37a USDR-I'1RCS 919-641-7902 P-1
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
I.: animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
imy.lemcnting a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
po:,sibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
IS. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
ail spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
Arimal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
ar-1 other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
sr=:�uld only be applied preplant with no further applications of
ar.Lmal waste during the crop season.
�1. Hi:lhly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bal:tom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
al.. waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
ma..ntain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
2. Wa:.te shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
sh:ll be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
pr.:ducts are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
el-.ment. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
mo;•itored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
me•:als approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusters for
opl:imum crap production and maintained. Soil and waste
ani.lysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
wa:.te application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
1. Dee1 animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
cazalina regulations.
Page: 14

�7a USDA -MRCS 919-641-7902 p.17
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
N ime :if Farm:
o..-ner Manager Agreement
I (we understand and will follow and implement the specifications
as-.d t)e operation and maintenance procedures, established in the
appro-ed animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(s..e) ):now that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
wi:ste treatment and storage system or construction of new
fi.cil_.ties will require a new certification to be submitted to the
9(:-rth Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
al:ima:s are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
1-i schz rge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state Erom a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
:A.orm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
.:irl at the office of the local soil and water Conservation District
tr_i waL1 be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
4a.ae c Facility Owner: PAUL DRAKE
'P ; ease print)
Aquat:ire: Date:IF
�S
rare oi` Manager(If different from owner):
:ci;:jnat .ire:
Date:
'a::ie o Person Preparing Plan! (Please print)HARGARET KNIGHT
%f'.'ili, i tion: EDGECOBME SWCD Phone No. 919--641-7900
.d,'Ires: i (Agency) : P 0 BOX 10
TARBORO NC 27886-0010
icinati re: ��- Date:EZ
Page: 15

Notification of Chancre of Ownership,:;::,:
Animal Waste Management Facility
(Please type or print all information that does not require a siznature)
In accordance with the requirements of 1 5A NC AC 2H .0217(a)(1)(H)(xii) this form is official
notification to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) of the transfer of ownership of an Animal Waste
Management Facility. This form must be submitted to DEM no later than 60 days following -the transfer
of ownership.
General Information: t
Name of Farm: Facility No: 33
Previous Owner(s) dame: �A. S. ZraLr_ f- Az rakc_ Phone No: AS.1- - e;17 -AS zy
New Owners) Name: A ,� I A, !7 r• c kc AX, I Phone No: _ �S1 - K� 7 - aj-jz
Nlailina Address:_.•} ,�� 310 - inc.�oa�
or
Farm Location: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit.
Latitude and Longitude: J !V Y S �V I 7 7- 3 Y SY" Countv: Go
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): 4r_- c. y3 IV oj- 4 Py`ne_�5! . %,re,_
Qperation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. if Animals Type of Carrie No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Laver 0 Dairy
3Teeder to Finish lG 9n _ ❑ Puilets ee: maw a
❑ Farrow to Wean
* Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Other Type of Livestock: ,Number of animals:
Acreage Available for Application: 3D Required Acreage: / 2
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds : .3 Total Capacity: 337. s/t= f Cubic Feet (ft�)
:,t � •J,e :t: �c :je yc ai :h arc J� M ?� a',k Yc ye �t * at xe �1e ak X;e � * -K rc :!e aY ai Yc are +C � ^;e ak ;e ie �e ye Y,e vc ac ae rc :p ie :?c x :E ae ae is •; yc Je ye :< x x ie :!� :K :f XY �e :jc ai ai c ie is �e :2 x se ie a i,� ic;e :s :c
Owner / Mana-er Agreement
I (we) verify that aU the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. 1(we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste manageaie tt plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures_ I (we) know that arty expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment :::.d
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Wale.
Quality (DWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste From
the storage or applicadon system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man -trade conveyance or xom a storm
event less severe than the 25-year, 2 4-hour scoria and there trust not be run-off from the applicadon of animal waste. I (we
understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards
developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be tiled at the farm and at the office of the
local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a techrt cal specialist and
submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership requires writren
notification to DWQ or a new certificatiorb[if the„aaproved plan is chanszd) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of New Land Owner :
Signature:
Name of Manager(if different from ow Fier):
Signature:
Date: !
Date:
Please si-n and return this form to: N. C. Division Of Water Quality
Neater Quality Srction. Compliance Group
NCO -- N1aV i. 11)96

ANIJILL WASTE MANAG DNS PLaN CERTI?ICATION FOR $Z7STING FEEDLOTS
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at
the'addrean on the reverse aide of this form.
Name of farm (Plea print) K e-- Ao, i ' r (�
Mailing Address: s
Phone iJo.:
County (of farm):
?arm location: Latitude and Longitude:— _ — /_ (regtiired). Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, et ) �n
Design capacity (number of animals): / I G
Average size of operation (12 month population avg.) _
Average acreage needed for. land application of waste (acres): /,2 Gt-�-
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6r .0005,'I certify that the
existing animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal
waste management plan that meets the operation and maintenance standards and
specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil
Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation
Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC- 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements and their corresponding minimum criteria have been verified
by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as
applicable: minimum separations (buffers); adequate quantity and amount of land
for waste utilization (or use of third party); access or ownership of proper
waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application
rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from
sto3=water runoff events less severe than the 25-%yyear,124-hour, storm.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print) :<<�?.lC�f1„r
Affiliation (Agency). N R_
Address: FJ, .•�G X lQ if�/�l�G/E'Ci Phone No. � ��- %iGQ
%.i I�
Signature: [ �i .� •L(!��-{2-',''[���, � Date: �I/TZS
r_aaacaceaa^^__nrcaccaaanass6.6a=acua�cczssscca=---=a=---=cn��==C cvc===
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will
require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state either directly through a man-made conveyance or through runoff from a
storm event less severe than the 25--year, 24--hour storm. The approved plan will
be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation
District.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print) zi,
Signature: r?. : o _ �. Date:
Name of Manager, if different from owner (Please print) : 1 1La A Dr�z.kc
signature: Date:
Hotn: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer_"
DDM USE ONLY: ACE)#

' Route 2, Box 3&4
Pinetops, NC 27864
April 15, 1999
Ms. Dianne Thomas, Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
NC DENR
P O Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Dear Ms. Thomas:
RECEIVED
V'IATEQ ALM" EC 10N
AIR ? 9 f999
Nan-Dischefge Permitting
I am writing In reference to a letter received March 25 requesting additional information on Drake Farms
(Application #AWS330026).
• Item 1 - I have enclosed an updated waste utilization plan. For clarity of fields and -crops, I have
also enclosed a new map with new field numbers.
Item 2 - This Item requested information concerning lagoon capabilities. There are three lagoons at
this facility. The two older lagoons are secondary lagoons. The newer lagoon (larger of the three)
serves as the primary lagoon. All storage in the larger lagoon is permanent. The two older lagoons
serve as temporary storage. The second lagoon serves as temporary storage (providing 120 days of
storage). The third lagoon Is used to provide for recycling waste through the buildings and is
additional storage over 120 days (see map as to reference of lagoon numbers).
Lagoon Number
Lagoon Number 1:
Lagoon Number 2:
Lagoon Number 3:
Capacity
14,827 cubic yards
3,957 cubic yards
2,778 cubic yards
Storage
Permanent
Temporary (120 days)
Temporary (Recycle)
• Item 3 — In reference to this item, please refer to the updated waste utilization plan. The operation
consists of both rented pasture and owned pasture. The waste utilization plan has been corrected to
reflect flelds owned and rented. Fields number 2 and 5 (FSA #) highlighted in yellow are part of
the farm operation, but are not used for land application.
Item 4 — In reference to this item, all small grain overseeded on Bermudagrass will be intensively
managed to maximize yields at the 100 pounds of nitrogen per acre. Rates were reduced by 25
percent (75 pounds of nitrogen) for grazing. See updated waste utilization plan and narrative
section for clarity.
• Item 5 — In reference to this Item, there was a misprint in the realistic yield. Yields have been
adjusted. The updated waste utilization plan reflects the changes. Spray records Indicate that millet
was being managed at 90 — 100 pound nitrogen rate.
I hope this Information clarifies any questions you may have. If I can be of assistance, please contact me at
252-827-2529.
Sincerely,
P'a '}
Paul A. Drake

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: PAUL DRAKE
Location: ROUTE i BOX 364
PINETOPS NC 27864
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to Finish swine
Number of Animals: 1690.00 hogs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors.are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1690 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 3211 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
1690 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hags/year = 3887 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
1626
1-1
Jo
FP
3.2
160
1.8
288
I
SEP-APR
1626
I1-2A
lJo
IIP
13.2
1160
I
11.5
1240 APR
1626
2-2B
BH
5.5
jKeB
I
1
1275
1
11.6
1440
APR-SEP
1626
�2-2B
KeB
IWA
I
12.5
1187.5
11.6
1300
SEP-MAR
1626
2-3
BH
5.5
275
4.4
jKeB
I
1
1
1
1
11210
APR-SEP
1626
--2-3
WA
2.5
187.5
jKeB
I
I
I
14.4
1825
SEP-MAR
END' I I I
TOTAL13303
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and'K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
1627
3-5
AuB
WA
2.5
187.5
2.43
455.625
SEP-MAR
1627
3-5A
WA
2.5
1AuB
1187.5 1
1.4
175
SEP-MAR
1627
3A-5
SA
3
1AuB
1115.5 1
12.43
1280.665
APR-AUG
1627
3A-5A
AUB
SA
3
1115.5 1
1.4
146.2
APR-AUG
1627
3-6
2.5
1AuB
IWA
1187.5 1
11.6
1300
SEP-MAR
1627
3A-6
SA
3
1AuB
1115.5 1
11.6
1184.8
APR-AUG
1627
4-6A
BH
5.5
JAUB
1275 1
11.7
1467.5
APR-SEP
1627
--4-6A
AUB
2.5
IWA
1187.5
11.7
1318.75
SEP-MAR
1627
4-7
BH
5.5
JAUB
1275 1
14.9
11347.5
APR-SEP
1627
M4-7
2.5
JAUB
IWA
1187.5
14.9
1918.75
SEP-MAR
1627
4-8
BH
5.5
275
2.7
JAUB
1742.5
APR-SEP
1627
�4-8
2.5
JAUB
IWA
1187.5
12.7
1506.25
SEP-MAR
END
Page: 4

• y
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TOTAL 5643.54
w Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer
annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for
nitrate levels is recommended.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
TONS
50
SA
SUMMER ANNUALS (I.E. Sorghum -Sudan Hybri
38.5
WA
WINTER ANNUALS (I.E. Small Grains, etc.)
75
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
00431 V .4
*�A
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
9.3
3303
18.16
5643.54
27.46
8946.54
* BALANCE
-5059.54
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page:

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 625.3 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 3126.5
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN.to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 10.4216666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 25.012 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
I
Application RatelApplic. Amount
Tract l
Field l
1
Soil Type
l crop
I
l (in/hr) l (inches)
I I
1626 l
1-1 l
Jo
I FP
!
1626 l
I
1-2A I
Jo
I
I FP
!
l I *1
I
1626
I
2-2B j
KeB
I
l BH
1
l I *1
I
1626 l
I
2-3 I
KeB
{
I BH
! I
i l *1
1626 l
1
-2-2B I
KeB
I
I WA
I I
l l *1
I
1626 l
I
-2-3 I
KeB
I
I WA
I
l l *1
1627 l
i
3-5 l
AuB
I
I WA
I I
l l *1
I
1627 l
I
3-5A l
AuB
I
I WA
I
l l *1
I
1627 1
3-6 l
AuB
I WA
l l *1
I
1627 l
I
3A-5 l
AuB
I
I SA
I
l l *1
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
1627
I I
13A-5A I
AuB
I I
I SA I
I
I *1
1627
13A-6 I
AuB
I SA
I *1
1627
1
1 4-6A I
AuB
I I
I BH
I *1
1627
I I
1 4-7 I
AuB
I I
I BH I
I *1
1627
I I
1 4-8 I
AuB
I I
I BH I
I *1
1627
I I
I -4-6A I
AuB
I I
I WA I
I *1
1627
I I
I -4-7 I
AuB
I I
I WA I
I *1
1627
I I
I -4-8 I
I I
AuB
I I
I WA I
I I
I *1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 120.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
4.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Bermudagrass Pasture
All bermudagrass pastures are managed as a grazing system. Any excess grass
may be harvested as hay.
Apply 50 pounds of nitrogen prior to grazing period, then apply 50 pounds after
each grazing period or hay cutting until the end of August. Do not exceed
275 pounds of nitrogen per year per acre unless hay is cut from pasture.
When hay is harvested nitrogen may be increased by 12.5 pounds per acre
per ton of hay harvested.
Bermudagrass Pasture overseeded with Rye
Rye should be drilled in short (3-5 inches tall) bermudagrass stubble before
October 15 at the rate of 1.5 bushels per acre. Rye will be managed as a
grazed system. Apply 38.5 pounds of nitrogen for rye growth between
September 15 and October 31. An additional 38.5 pounds of nitrogen may be
applied to rye in February and March. If rye is cut for hay, an
additional 12.5 pounds of nitrogen may be applied per acre for each ton of
hay harvested. Either cut rye for hay or close graze prior to heading or
April 7, so as not to impede bermudagrass growth.
Fescue Pasture
Fescue is a cool season perennial. Manage waste application to provide maximum
growth during these periods. Apply waste in Spring (Feb -Apr) and Fall
(Sept -Nov). Apply waste before Fall and Spring grazing periods and after
each grazing cycle. Do not exceed 160 pounds of nitrogen per acre per
year unless hay is harvested. An additional 12.5 pounds of nitrogen may
be added for each ton of hay harvested.
Millet
Millet is a summer annual. Plant in May at a rate 10 - 15 pounds per acre.
Waste may be applied prior to planting and incorporated into the soil up
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Rye
Rye
to 50 pounds of nitrogen. At 6 to 8 inches tall, apply second application
of nitrogen at a rate of 38.5 pounds of nitrogen. Begin grazing or
harvesting at height of 12 to 14 inches. Rotate cattle off at 6 inches
tall and apply 38.,5 pounds of nitrogen each grazing. You can expect 4 -
5 grazing periods from June to September.
is a winter annual. Seed rye in September at a rate of 1.5 bushels per
acre. Waste may be applied prior to planting. Apply 50 pounds of
nitrogen at planting and incorporate into soil. When rye is 5 - 10 inches
tall, a second application may be applied. Grazing may begin at 14 -16
inches tall. After each grazing period, additional nitrogen may be
applied. Do not exceed a total of 100 pounds of nitrogen for entire crop.
An additional 12.5 pounds of nitrogen may be applied for each ton of hay
harvested per acre.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED, SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 13

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of'in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: PAUL DRAKE
(Please print)
signature: Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Person Preparing Plan:
Aff iliation:EDGECOBME SWCD
Address (Agency): P O BOX 10
Date:
(Please print)MARGARET KNIGHT
Phone No. 919-641-7900
TARBORO NC 27886-0010
Signature: �- c Date: /E
Page: 15

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, , hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 16

• ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
day of
19
My commission expires
Notary Public.
(SEAL)
Page: 17

F ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
, a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
, 19
My commission expires
Notary Public.
(SEAL)
Page: IS

Cl
�IIIXA Xi At�::
'� . J�
......... ...
MINE

State of North. Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens,, Director
March 25, 1999
Drake Farms
Rt 2 Box 364
Pinetops NC 27864
Attn: Paul Drake
Awr
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS330026
Additional Information Request
Drake Farms
Animal Waste Operation
Edgecombe County
Dear Paul Drake:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by April 24, 1999:
1. The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) submitted does not show any application windows for the winter
annuals or for the summer annuals. Please contact your technical specialist and have these added to your
plan.
2. The lagoon capacity documentation submitted is not clear. 1 understand that there are three lagoons at this
facility. Are the two older lagoons acting as primary and secondary lagoons? It was difficult to decipher
which calculations were for which lagoons. Please indicate the total capacity for each of the three lagoons
at this facility. Please show the amount of permanent and temporary storage and the number of days of
temporary storage for each lagoon (WUP indicates 180 but calculations show 120).
3. All land in your WUP is listed in table 1. Table 1 is titled "acres owned by producer". However, there is a
waste utilization agreement included in the application package. Please indicate which land the producer
owns and which land is utilized through a third party agreement. Also, on the map submitted, fields 2 and
5 are highlighted but these do not appear in the WUP. Please verify that these fields are not used for waste
disposal. If they are, they will need to appear in the WUP.
4. Your WUP lists the nitrogen application rate for a small grain overseed into Bermuda grass as 102.5
pounds per acre. The Sixth Guidance Memorandum to Technical Specialists dated August 18, 1997 states
that only 50 pounds of nitrogen per acre should be applied to small grain overseeded into Bermuda grass.
Current guidance allows for 100 pounds of nitrogen per acre under strict management practices as
mentioned in the memo included with this letter. Please have your technical specialist reduce the nitrogen
rate on the rye overseed to 50 pounds per acre or incorporate the attached management 2ractices into the
narrative of the WUP for the application of 10 pounds ot nitrogen per acre.
5. The yields and nitrogen application rates listed in your WUP for millet are higher than currently
recommended. Please contact your technical specialist in order to have the yields and nitrogen application
amounts reduced or have these justified in the narrative section of the WUP.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All
information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information
requested by this letter must be submitted on or before April 24, 1999 or the Division will return your application as
incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
O. Box 29535, Raleigh, worth Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 3.3-0026
Paul Drake
Page 2
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid'permit is a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
if you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364.
Sincerely,
I I �5
Dianne Thomas
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

* a, a "a ­41LY di xi d GU�a iUB�-� A w••••••• •
Of The Uriventy of North Cam(m
09
Cdlege of Agria&ure and Life Sdwc
Campus Box 7620.
Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
919.515.2647
919.515.7959 (fax)
Memorandum
TO: North Carolina Certffed. Technical Specialists
FROM: Dr. Jim Green, Chairman
NC State University Forage .l roductfon Workgroup
DATE: June 29, 1998
SUBJECT: Crop Management Practices for Select Forages
Used in Waste Management
The following is a four -page summary of suggestions for management practices for some
forage crops that can be used in waste management plans. These suggestions are a result of
discussions within the NC State University Forage Production Workgroup, a group comprised
of NC State faculty and MRCS agency personnel with expertise with the crops.
There are limited documented research responses of some of these practices on the many soils
and environments where these crops are currently being grown. The Forage Production
Workgroup has taken the available data and used the combined experiences and realistic
estimates of key people to come up with suggestions that will allow'farmers to incorporate
these crops and practices into waste management plans. As data become available to
substantiate or refute these suggestions; .the Forage Production Workgroup -will make
appropriate changes.
Bermuda Overseeded With Cereal Rye and Annual Ryegrass
Currently two types of ` ryegass" are being used for winter overseediing in fields used for
animal waste managerent_ Cereal rve is a winter annual smallgrain that looks sinrilar to
wheat, barley and oats. Annual ryeg-ass is.a winter annual grass that looks nmch Iike tall
fescue. Both of these grasses, when growing during the winter on bermuda sod,';can have.
significant impact oa subsequent berlmtda yields., In .effect, the total yields from an acre
growing the combinatiou of bermuda with these winter annuals wiIl..usually yield between 1-2
tons more per, acre than bermuda growing alone for the year. Therefore, the total amount of
PAN /acre for the year is about 100 Is more than for bermuda alone. Although cereal rye and.
annual ryegrass are suitable crops for overseeding, the management of the crops are different.
and thus practices implemented are dependent on the crop selected.

of the U*.I ty d NorM Cwoma
College of Agriaftra and life sciencc
Carnpus Box 7620
Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
919.5152647
919.515.7959 (fez)
Eastern Gamag=s
Limited data are available on the response of gamagrass. to various levels of N and soil types
in North Carolina However, until further data is collected, the following guidelines may
be used.
L On sandy textured soils that are well drain or excessively well drained, gamagrass may
yield similar to hybrid bermudagrass at similar PAN rates.
2. - On heavy textured sods that are poorly to somewhat poorly drained, gamagrass may yield
1.5-3 times more than hybrid bermuda.
Gamagrass establishes slowly and will not usually produce much harvestable forage during
the establishment year. It is best to allow the growth during the seedling year to accumulate
for most or all season; if it is to be harvested, it should be done after full seedhead formation
on a majoricy' of the plants. Therefore, PAN for the seedling year should_ be modified
accordingly. Overseeding gamagracs with winter annuals is not currently advised because the
harvesting or grazing management of the winter annual crops during February -April would be
detrimental to the survival of gamag*ass_ Gamagrass should not normally be harvested or
grazed below 6-8 inches stubble_
Application rates are to be based on the realistic N rates that address the N news per ton of
hay, a realistic yield and an appropriate application window. When harvested as hay in the 24-
36 inch stage of growth, the N rate ranges from 40-50 lb ton of dry matter. The PAN rate for
grazed systems Est be reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard # 90.
The application window for gamagrass is slightly earlier than for bermuda; gamagrass starts
growing about 3-4 weeks earlier than Coastal bermudagrass and about 2-3 weeks earlier than
Tifton 44. Gamagrass is dormant from frost to March.- The last application of PAN in the
summer should be prior to August 31.
Rescuegrass (Le. Matua)
Rescuegrass is a cool season Cass and makes most of its growth from March -June and
September -November. It should receive most of its N during the September -October and late
February through May months. Limited data are available for realistic yields of rescue ass
on various soils and at various N levels in North Carolina. However, until further data is
collected the following suggestions may be useful.
I. On sandy, well drained to excessively drained sons, rescuegrass may yield 1.5- 3 times
fescue, assuming a uniform and dense stand of grass is present.

trt
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
provided oaly If •ddltloasl I4Ma4d bas to bM Ieuod, etc.)
hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Uti izatzon System
on 7-0 -f acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of .waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date:
Waste Producer:— Date:
Technical Representative; . (,J� Date: 112 3 y�
SWCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement: % — 40 -,F6 , 19_ to 20�
(Ni��-••- of Tan Zaars on Cost Shared haws)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
0

y
+ ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: PAUL A. DRAKE
Location: ROUTE 1 BOX 364
PINETOPS NC 27864
Telephone; 252-827-2529
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals: 1690.00 hogs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: I

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1690 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 3211 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
1690 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 3887 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
1626
1A-1
Jo
FP
3.2
160
1.8
288
I
SEP-APR
1626
1A-2
lJo
IiP
I3.2
1160 1
11.5 1240
APR
1626
1B-2A
KeB
BH
5.5
ii
I
1275 1
�1.6 1440
APR-SEP
1626
�IB-2
KeB
WA
50
102.5
ii
11.6 1164
1626
1B--3
BH
5.5
jKeB
li
I
1275 1
14.4 11210
APR-SEP
1626
�1B-3
KeB
WA
50
102.5
ii
14.4 1451
1027
2A-5
WA
50
75
2.43
jAuB
I
1182.25
1027
2A-5A
AuB
WA
50
76.5
T
1
1.4 130.6
1027
-2A-5
AuB
SA
4.5
1225 1
12.4 1540
1027
-2A-5
AuB
SA
4.5
1
I v�o
1225
1.4 190
1027
2A-6
WA
50
76.5
jAuB
I
1
11.6 1122.4
1027
-2A-6
AuB
SA
4.5
M
1225 1
11.6 1360
1027
2A--6A
AuB
BH
5.5
1.7
467.5IAPR-SEP
1275.
1027
--2A-6
AuB
IWA
150
1102.5 1
11.7 1174.25
Page:
3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
II
1027
213-7 jAuB
BH
5.5
1275 1
�4.9
11347.5
SEP
1027
213-7
AuB
WA 50
102.5
I
14.9
1502.25
1027
213-8
AuB
BH
5.5
x
1
1275
1
12.7
1742.5
APR-SEP
END
I
TOTAL17352.25
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
a
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
END
TOTAL 10
.. Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer
annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for
nitrate levels is recommended.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
TONS
50
SA
SUMMER ANNUALS (I.E. Sorghum -Sudan Hybri
50
WA
WINTER ANNUALS (I.E. Small Grains, etc.)
1.5
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE I
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1. AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
23.03
7352.25
0
0
23.03
7352.25
* BALANCE
-3465.25
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 625.3 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 3126.5
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 10.4216666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 25.012 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the -recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
I I
I Field I
Soil Type
1027
I
I 2A-5 I
AuB
1027
I
12A-5A I
AuB
}
I I
1027
12A-6 I
AuB
1027
I I
12A-6A I
AuB
1027
I
12B-7 I
AuB
1027
I
12B-8 I
AuB
1027
I
I -2A-5 I
AuB
1027
I
I -2A-5 I
AuB
1027
I
I -2A-6 I
AuB
1027
I
I -2A-6 I
AuB'
(Application RatejApplic. Amount
crop I (in/hr) I (inches)
I I I
WA
1 I 1
WA I I
1 I !
I WA I I
BH
I I
BH
I I
BH
I I
SA
I I l
SA
I I
SA
I
WA
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
1027
1
I -2B-7 I
AuB
1 1
1 WA 1
1
1626
1 1A-1 1
Jo
FP 1
1
1626
I I
1 1A-2 1
Jo
I I
FP 1
1626
1 1B-2A I
KeB
1
BH
1626
11B-3 I
KeB
I BH I
I
1626
--1B-2 I
KeB
I WA 1
1626
� I
1 -1B-3 I
KeB
I
I WA
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be.within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application .rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Page: 10

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use'of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to.secure an update of the waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in -the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a.manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 12

WASTE •UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets'North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 13

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN s
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:DRAKE FARMS
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: PAUL A. DRAKE
(Please print)
Signature: -r �b� /�,� ,�� Date: ,A ,2
Name of Manager(If different from owner):_
Signature: Date:
Date:
Name of
Perst= Preparing Plan: (please print)MARGARET KNIGHT
Affiliation:EDGECOBME SWCD Phone No. 919-641-7900
Address (Agency): P 0 BOX 10
TARBORO NC 27886-0010
Signature: WDate:
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I,
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Waste Producer:
Technical Representative:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19_ to
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: . 15

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 16

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I,
Waste Utilization__ Third .Party Receiver Agreement
hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver:
Term -of Agreement:
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost --Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
Date:
to
a Notary
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
, 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
Notary Public.
Page: 17

A,k 777
IL ; -u.t: r f I C L> s t9 N t h t>}r- I •
a 4 i rr T
"Allwr.
d, L 't
—
rl
WN-
rl�lr
a k J1' i r-,!�14; rl I I . �5r 4•k h }�i I ,rq ti
Jt " 4Lrd r 4 Y.tyl�'!i� : r , ! 1 ? 1 q. • i
ofyxll
+ti� 1 i.Wfi, i ! 1 ijI � ! f l r lk ��' oT 4�" '•I� '' 4 �+;� '!�
���>{°
f; , �l pc ` ,'� SU+ �vT :; w �• sE yya + { r.� d' ���O�A 1, Y' � �' : � itr I �; �'
he _
W — -
�,1.
rr� }� � -��1 �th"J: • � � �;
5 4�
t7,1{„� .u,� I •r� I x't f+ ��r7 � _ '�i�{"'r '�' t•r k;
1 r _
I Fya jk� 4, q r Y i
,
� r i... T r, �::i ! i tir'f � '71�r . r 1C •' �.. � ' r
erg( r Y
vI p999 �•

9wl-

,-o �d
�l�o�q f ��x�
!-j
4
-All�-�9
70/

S�e6 ication Oata THE GORMAN-RUPP CO. Sec.55 PAG1aao
a.
A,C, E, J, D
0
Self Prim!ng Centrifugal
Basic Pump
GORMAN-RUPP Mode! 13A2-B,13A4-B,13A20-B
Size 3"x3"
PUMP SPECIFICATIONS
Size: 3" x 3" NPT - Female
Casing: Gray Iron No. 30
(Maximum Operating Pressure 70 lbs.)
impeller: Open Type, 2 Vanes, Ductile Irbn No, 60.40-18
(Handles 1%" Dia. Spherical Solids)
Impeller Shaft: Steel No. 1045
Wear Plate; Replaceable: Steel No. 1018
Cover Plate: Removable: Gray Iron No. 30 — 18 lbs.
Pedestal: Gray fron No. 30
Setif Plate: Gray Iron No. 30
Seat Liner: Brass No. 70-30 (Model 13A2.8 ONLY)
Shaft Sleeve: Stainless Steel No. 304 (Models 13A4.8, 13A20-8)
Flap Valve: Suna•N; Gruy Iron No. 30
Radial Bearing: Ball Type
Thrust Bearing: Ball Type
Bearing Lubrication: Oil ;
Flanges: Gray Iron No. 30
Gaskets: Vegetable Fiber, Buns, Rubber
0-Rings: Suna-N
Hardware; Internal Wetted. Std. Plated Steel
Hardware; External: Std. Plated Steel
Standard Equipment:
Oil Level Sight Gauge
Strainer
Optional Equipment:
Suction & Discharge Flanges
Casing Heater
Durametallic Seat (Model 13A4-8ONLY)
MAX. 0J
!MAX. (2)
MAX.
PUMP
SEAL
OPER.
TEMP.
V-BELT
MODEL
PRESS.
° F;
SPEED
13A2.8
G-R
70 LBS.
1100 F
2600
13A4-8
PACKING
70 LBS.
212° F
2500
13A20.8
I OIL -LOBE
70 LBS.
160° F
1 2500
(1) It is recommended that Gorman -Hupp be contacted for ap-
proval on conditions above those noted.
(2) ' Consult factory for applications with liquids in excess of
temperatures Indicated,
11PELLER
kAFT
SE
Di
Lc
tic
X
sq
SEAL MODEL 13A4-8
Packing is Asbestos.
Split Gland is Gray Iron.
Lantern Ring is Teflon.
SEAL MODEL 13A20-B
Mechanical Oil -Lubricated Double Floating,
Self -Aligning, Rotating and Stationary Feces
=AL are Tungsten Titanium Carbide. Elastomers
are Viton. Cage and Spring are Stainless
Steel.
(;OR THE GORMAN-RUPP COMPANY . MANSFIELD, OHIO
GORMAN-RUPP GORMAN•RUP-P OF CANADA LIMITED • ST. THOMAS, ONTARIO. CANADA ......,..Us.
orngni ov vw Gorman -Rupp Comwr 1982
W
J

3'RICP QUOTATION ­ toRM2o4oa
y .
T.
1 Y
:TOM CROCKETT IRRIGATION
i... ;;. P. 0. BOX 390,0 751 B. MAIN ST.
WILLiAMSTOK NC 27892
: [phone]
INC.
Mr. Paul Drake
Rt... 1, Box 364
Pine Tops, NC 27864
Jere is our quotation on the goods named, subject to the conditions noted:
--ER FROM RAPIDFORMS INC. 601 UNKIND BLY0. BEU AIAWR, NJ pepjj. � ••,
l Y CALL tOLL rIkEtL bOO-257-9754 pn NJ 600.322.55E71
QUWATION
0568
SALESMAN
PLEASE INDICATE T141S
NUMDER MPNEN ORDERING
CONDIjIONS: The prices and terms on this quotation are not subject to verbal changes or other agreements unless approved in writing by the Nome Ulfice of
the Solid? All quotations and agreements are contingent upon strikes, accidents, fires, availability of materials and all other causes beyond our control. Prices
are based on costs and Conditions existing on date of quotation and are subject to change by the Seller before final acceptance.
Typographical 'and stenographic errors subject to correction. Purchaser agrees to accept either overage or shortage not In excess of ten percent to be
charged for. pro-rata.:Purchaser assumes liability for patent and copyright infringement when goods are made to Purchaser's specifications, When quotation spe-
elfies material to be lurnished by -the purchaser, ample allowance must be made for reasonable spoilage and material must be of suitable quality to facilitate
.efficient production.
Conditions not specifically stated herein shall be governed by established trade customs Terms inconsistent with those stared herein whkh may appear on
Purchaser's formal order will not be binding on the Seller.
.V'-QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
PRICE
AMOUNT
' '':1
13A2-B Pump
$1491.00
f Al.
Standard Base
328.00
Standard Coupler
67.00
1885.00
Less 10%
188 50
1696.50
5,.H.P. Electric Motor, 1 Ph., 1750 RPM, Tot 11y Enclosed
433.00
$2129.50
i'•fS' ,
FY)IIM =403 11APIOFORMS, 010. MU MAWP, NJ- 00=1 ,f
t QUOTE VALID FOR DAYS. By L lry�

r �-
I
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 919--571 -- 4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 919{41 7843
SWCD 919-641-7900
NRCS 919-641--7900
This plan will be implemented in the event -that wastes from
your operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off
site. You should -not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem.
You should make every effort to ensure that this does not
happen. The following are some action items you should
take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the
situation, this may or may not be possible. Suggested
responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all additional flow to the lagoon.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field- actions
include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
D Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid
separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.

E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often
this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small well or ditch to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to
lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap
or remove animals and fill holes and compact
with a clay type soil.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious
damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what
duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish
kills, or property damage?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ
(Division of Water Quality) regional office; Phone
919-571-4700. After hours, emergency number: 919-
733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility, telephone number, the details of
the incident from item 2 above, the exact location
of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions.
The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,
call local EMS Phone number 919-641-7843.
C. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 919-641-7915, local SWCD
office phone number 919-641-7900, and local NRCS
office for advice/technical assistance phone number
919-641-7900.
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask that
person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair
of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: Jr
b. Contractors Adress: -
c. Contractors Phone: d dr

6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the
lagoon (NRCs, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: X.-5 , LW q %TL.C--Y taRcS
b . Phone: ('41- 111nn
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the
system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep
problems with release of wastes from happening again.

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Sanrcc Cause 11Mi's to Control lasers Site Speeiric PI.;tctices
Lirluid Systems •----.._.��
Flnsh (;utters Acetrtltulation of solids 0 Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove acctunulated solids rrotn
gutters as designed.
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids ;tt
disiqltarge
kigoons and fins Crusted Solids Maintain lagoons, settling. basins and Pits where
Pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
8 incites over more Ihan 30% of surface. '
Execssive Vegclative • Decaying vegelalion P-i-'Maintain vegetative control along banks or
('Frowilt lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
Zna
accumulation of decaying vegclative tnaner
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
my Sy_,Ienis
_
Feed Spillage Pr -Design, operate and tttaiwaitt feed systems
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
w
accttnwlatiott of decaying wastage.
f Clean up spillage on a routine basis (c.g., 7 - 10
` sP: d
C�c
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winler).
VCed Slolage ACCn[nt[l;tliOttS or feed residues fYtteduce moisture aceuntrtlation within and
'
1 ��"��t ''���-tom
arotutd inunediatd ftet'inteler of Iced storage
areas by insuring drainage away fircun sine
and/or providing adequate containment (e.g.,
7
covered hin for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
GK 11tspect For and remove or break lilt iccimitihiled
solids in filter strips arttnndl feed slorat;e ;is
needed.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page I

Snttrce Cause
DMPs to Control Insects.
Site Specific Practices
Animal I lolling Areas Accumulations of animal wastes ❑
Eliminate low areas [lint trap moisture along;
and feed wastage
fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
y .,
O
Maintain fence rows and flter'strips around
animal holding; areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry Manure I laudlinb Accumulations of aninial wastes Cl
€2eniove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
SystcuIs
day interval during summer; 15-30 day intcrv;il
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
O
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
Cl
inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
muntire handling areas as needed.
I'or more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State I Iniversiiy,
Italeigh, NC, 27695.7613.
ARIItr - Nuvemuber 11, 1990. Page 2

Suurcr Cause IIMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Standing water around 6 Improper drainage; C1 Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities 0 Microhint decomposition of away from facilities
organic (natter
Manure Irackt:Ll 011to Poorly maintained access roads fJ Farm access road maintenance
pu61i4 roads from farm
access
Addkional Information : Available From :
Swine Manure Management ; 0200 Rule/13MP Packet NCSI1, Comity lxtension Center
SM11C P(UIitICI1011 Pant] Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; MAE Fact Sheet NCSU - HAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge - Lagoon Treatment ; E-BAC 128-89 NCSU - IIA 1:
Swine Production Facility manure Management; Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; CBAE 129-88 NCSU - BAI;
I_agunn Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; EBAE 103-83 NCSU - IIAF
Calibration of Manure: and Wastewater Application L"eluipme:nt ; EBAC Vael Sheet NCSIJ - HAI:
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings ; Pill-33 NCSU - Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program ; NPPC Manual NC Pork Producers Assoc
Optinos for Managing Odor ; a repnn froin the Swine Odor Task Force NCSU Atari Commrtnicat ions
Nuisance Concems in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies ; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Horida Cooper❑rive Extension
AI'M IC - lauvemlicr 11. 1990, Vale 5

Snetrce Cause DMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specirlc Practices
Lill slaliuns 6 Agitation during sump tank EF Sump tank covers
tilling and drawdown
I:utd of drainpipes at 0 Agitation during wastewater ❑ Cxtcnd discharge Point of pipes undcrnuallu
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
lagoon surfaces a Volatile gas e:nlissiotls; Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; 0" Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio-,
0' Minimum agitation while pumping;
O Mechanical aeration;
O Proven biological additives
Irrigatiun sprinkler High pressure agitation; Irrigate out, dty days with little or no wind;
nOLLICs Wind drift ❑ Minimum recommended operating procedure;
0" Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
C-' Pump from second -stage lagoon
Dead hints a Carcass decomposition ❑ I'rol)cr dispositiotti of carcasses
nead hitd disgms.tl pits & Carcass decomposition C1 Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits;
O Proper location/construction of disposal pits;
0 Disposal pit covers tight fitting
5lantlinl; wider anumd Improper drainage; l-3,01-ade and landscape Stich that %valor drains
Ijcihtics Microbial decomposhinn of away Ironi facilities
organic matter
Mild tracked onto public Paorly tnainlaincd access roads farm access road maintenance:
mauls fiom I-trtn access
Atltlltitin.tl lnftt'rm.uiutt : Availahlt: I"rum
1,miltry I-oLtmtre Maiwi;eownt ; 0200 Rttle/13MP Packet NCS11. C'ntttiry lixlensinn Ce:rtlrr
futility Layer Production F.tcility Manure Management: Iligh Rise, Deep ['it ; 1:11A1; 131-89 NUS I -IIAI:
PoIlllry layer Production Facility Manure Management: Ifndercage Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; FBAV 130-R$ NUStI - 11AF
I..tl:unn DeSVI and Management far Livestock Manure Trealmenl and Storage ; HIIAF 103-83 NC'SI.I - BAI:
C.:illbrillieHl of M.tnurt! anti Wastewater Application Equipment ; HBAl? Fact Shect NCS11 - IIAI-
['miller 1)ispttsd of Dead Poultry ; PS&I' Chide No. 19 NC:SI1 - I'oullry Science
Nuis.mce Concerns in Animal Manure: Management: C3tlors and Flies ; I111O107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cnoperalivc I:ale:nsion
AN10C - November 1 1, 1996, l'at;e 7

t ATTACHMENT B
,a� .��A W M
ate ana 45 eI I K�It
Biological and Agricultural Engineering. North Carolina State University
LIVESTOCK HASTE SAMPLING, AYALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF'LAND APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker*
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure
Ls Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
different locations using nonmetallic collectors,
ii'. From storage
a. Collect about 2 Ibs of manure from under the surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
$. Liquid Manure Slurry
i Under -slotted -floor pit
a.Xgxtend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into
manure to pit floor.
b.-Seal upper end,of conduit (a.g., by,placing a thumb over and
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lover and, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamplas from 5 or more locations or at least 1 quart.
d.;Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. :take sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take subsam:)Ies from about 5 pit locations, from agitator pump
or from manure spreader and place -in a plastic btckec.
* Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, :.C.
r
r
1 of
z /

ATT W MENT B
3 of 3
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disin:ectants,
A soaps, or treat in any other Way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab gtickly.
C. Hand -delivery is, most reliable way of sample transfer.
D, If mailed, protect sample container with packing material suc! as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Cintacts:
i. A&L Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Whitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Arenue
Richmond, VA 23237 Wheeling, IL 60►90
Ph: [phone] Ph: (312)398-01-.0
li. Fisher Scientific Co. iv. NASCO
3315 Winton Road 901 .Janesville A •enue
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fort Atkinson, W. 53538
Ph: [phone] Ph: (414)563-24 6
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
C. The NCDA provides this service for North Carolina residents.
1. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on litter; etc.)
c. Waste type (dairy-loc scraped manure, liquid slurry; seine-pic
slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Roucine analyses performed on all sanples: N. P, K, Ca. Ng, Na,
S. Fe, Yn, Zn, Cu. B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DK. Ho, Cd, Ni, Pb
0
23

r'
Mortality Manageiment Methods
(check which method(s) arc being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
` stream or public body of water.
�f Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
5WCU5 VLAPza AST 5 rrE re--p- VtF��7 Au 1 M ALL Cuz=oA ! $Y 'rk�
❑. Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which' in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18. 1996

Clearing All trees and brush shall be removed from the .
impoundment area before construction is started. The foundation
of the lagoon shall be cleared of all trees, stumps, roots,
brush, sod, and debris. All stumps and all roots exceeding 1
inch in diameter shall be removed to a minimum depth of 1 foot.
Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. After
clearing is completed the foundation area shall be loosened
thoroughly and roughly leveled, with suitable equipment, before
placement of any embankment material.
Cutoff -Trench: A cutoff trench shall be excavated to a minimum
depth ofZ4inches. The exact depth shall be determined on site by
SCS. If the lagoon is built with pans the cutoff trench shall be
backfilled in thin layers, not to exceed 4 inches in depth with kcai
SCAL material. or b n
theouting of the hauling and spreading equipment over the fill
in s on -the -surface pf each laver of
fill -will be traversedby-not less thgn one treadtrack the
loaded equipment traveling in a direct gn Parallel to the main
axis of the fill. Otherwise, the cutoff trench shall be
backfilled in 9 inch layers and compacted with a sheepsfoot
roller with a minimum of 4 passes per unit width of fill lift.
All standing water shall be removed from the trench before
backfilling is started.
Excavation- Topsoil shall be stocked piled separately for later
use. The bottom of the lagoon shall be excavated as shown on the
plans. Where pervious material (SP, etc.) is exposed during
excavation, it shall be un e cut and backfilled with a compacted
layer of highly plastice. material approximately six (6)
inches in thickness. Scarify and compact the bottom and, where
practicable, the side slopes of the lagoon to decrease the
permeability of the soil in the lagoon.
Embankment Construction: The material placed in the embankment
shall be free of sod, roots, stones over six (6) inches in
diameter, and other objectionable materials. fiz, SM, ML,G3C,
materials shall be used in the embankment. Any pervious material
found shall be used on the outside slope. Construction of the
embankment sball be made in layers not to exceed 4 inches in
C v f to r better than t o
routing Qf tbt hauling and spreading equipment over 1 in
such a manner that- everv__point_on the siarface- of each laver of
fill will _be -traversed by not less than one tread tragk of the
Parallel to the main
axis of the fill. If pans are not used, construction of the
embankment shall be made in layers not to exceed 9 inches in
thickness and compacted with a sheepsfoot roller with a minimum
of 4 passes per unit width of fill lift. Construction of the
fill shall be undertaken only at such times that the moisture
content of the fill material will permit a reasonable degree of
compaction. Construction of the embankment shall allow an
13

additional 5% for settlement. Stock piled topsoil shall be
spread over top of embankment and outside side slopes for the
establishment of vegetation.
2,ollution Contrgl During Cons = ction: Stripping of embankment
and borrow areas shall be done as they are needed in a normal
sequence of construction. Use temporary mulch protection on all
disturbed areas that are subject to erosion and will not have
substantial additional work performed for 30 days.
Vegetation shall be established on the slopes,
embankment top and all other disturbed areas, except the area
that will be inundated, as specified in the plans as soon as
possible after construction. Necessary steps shall be taken to
ensure that a good stand of vegetation is established in a
reasonable amount of time.
j2ermangpt Stake: A permanent stake (CCA salt treated 4"x4" post
or 1 inch diameter PVC pipe with tee) marked to indicate pumping
level elevations, shall be placed in the inside slope at one end
of the lagoon.
0

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Producer: 'DMY-C-_
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for carrying out the
routine operation and maintenance work needed to keep this swine waste
management system functioning as planned. Routine maintenance is
considered to be normal good care of the system. Good maintenance adds
to beauty, usefulness, and permanence.
A. Maintenance
The routine maintenance of the lagoon involves the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment top and side
slopes: "gLAS -. - ' is being
established on these areas. Beginning in 19q" and each year
thereafter, the embankment should be fertilized with 800 pounds
of 10--10-10 per acre to maintain a vigorous stand.
2. Control of brush and trees on the embankment. This may be done
by mowing, spraying, or chopping, or a combination of all three.
This will need to be done at least once each year and possibly
twice in years favorable to heavy growth of vegetation.
Maintenance inspections of the lagoon should be made during the
initial filling of the lagoon and at least annually. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
1. Waste Inlet Pipes, Overflow Pipes
a. condition of pipes
(1) separation of joints
(2) cracks or breaks
2. Pool Area
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. floating or lodged debris
3. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking' or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability - slumps or bulges
C. erosion and rodent damage
4. Transfer Pump
I

._I . .
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
B. Operation
Your animal waste management facility was designed for a total of
/, G90 sows (frt� to ) . The lagoon contains both
permanent and temporary storage. The permanent storage is not to be
pumped in order to ensure that anaerobic action will occur. The
design includes permanent storage of one cubic foot per pound of
steady state live weight.
The temporary storage portion of. the lagoon includes capacity for the
volume of waste -produced over ldo days, the amount of rainfall in a
25 year 24 hour storm event, and rainfall in excess of evaporation.
Your facility is designed for lao days of temporary storage;
therefore, it will need to be pumped every Eck months. Begin pump --
out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches elevation N$.d as marked
by permanent markers. Stop pump --out when the fluid level reaches
elevation
The attached waste management plan should be followed. This plan
recommends sampling and testing of waste (see Attachment B) before
land application. The waste material should be analyzed before each
application cycle to determine its nutrient content. A soil test of
the area of application should be made annually to insure the waste
is applied as reasonably and practically possible to recommended
rates.
It is strongly recommended that the treatment lagoon be pre --charged
to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during start—up. Pre ---
charging reduces the concentration of the initial waste entering the
lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be covered with
effluent at all times.
The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of pollutants
into waters of the United States. The Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Management,
has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

U.' S. 'Debartment pf Agriculltdre l NC-ENG-34
Soil Conservation Service September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION'DATA SHEET FOR DAMS.
Landowner_ _ County
Community or Group No. onservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth..of Water to Top of Dam 4D Ft. Length of Flood Pool ANIM Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation // --
Evaluation by rea.ch of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est.-Elev. :LSt.
Elevation
Kind of
:Improvements:
of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land Use
Improvements
Above :Floodwater Above
Flood. Plain:
Flood Plain
Ft. Ft.
Ft.
Ft.
1 :2,000 :200 :0,2
2
.
3
Describe potential for loss of life and.d¢amage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach /1/0n4F'&_ ,-3rptp,.,4, a/ -�' r- /p,5S_ rW /.4�2 n r_
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I, II, III, IV, V)
By
name) (7 (title -
Concurred By ,a E .
(am � (title)
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date 7 �y
Date
FA

INSTRUCTIONS
All dams built with technical­ass'istance'from the Soil'Conservation Service
must have a hazard classification assigned by the person,respbnsible for
approving the -design.,, MoVi farm ponds, except in borderline cases, can
be classified after a complete.field investigation without assuming failure .
and making breach studies.' This data sheet is to be used for recording
'the information obtained through field studies and for documenting the
hazard"cTassification. Where there is aIpossibility for loss of'life or T
major property damage from a dam failure, an approved breach routing
procedure is to be used. (Consult with the -area engineer.)
Hazard classifications of dams are made by.evaluating the possibility
for loss of life and the extent of damage that would result if'the.dam
should suddenly breach --that is --a section of the dam be suddenly and
completely washed out. 'It is to be assumed that a wall of water will be
released equal to the height of the dam. This flood wave will be reduced
in height as it moves down the flood plain. The wave height (depth of
flooding) should be evaluated -for a sufficient.distance downstream until
the estimated flood level will not cause significant damage to improvements,
such as -homes, buildings, roads, utilities, reservoirs, etc. The breach
flood level will be reduced depending on the valley storage, slope, and
openess-of the flood plain; however, in a -narrow steep valley slopes
steeper than 10% should be given special consideration. One method of
evaluation -is to compare available valley storage (under flood conditions)
to impoundment storage (figured to the top of the dam) for each reach
evaluated with a judgment estimate made of the flood wave height at all
critical points downstream.
Should there be any questions about the hazard classification for a dam,
the area engineer should be consulted before making design commitments.

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL
SC�S 'SOIL CONSERVATION SERVI
.10 i !
SOIL INVESTIGATION. TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY; `OF"PROPOSED POND SITE
W ATE1
CROPLAND
! / i / / 1 ACRES' ! I ! ' i •
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Approx. scale 11f =-feet)
Loc�te reference Point on center line of dam and identify an sketch.
e■■■■eee■■■■i���i'iia�■el■■e■■�e■
■r■■■■■�■■e■t��®�■lam■_•+■■■e■e■
■■■e■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■yes■■
BORING 1• PROME
Make and list dam-51te and spillway borings first- then ponded arm and borrow pit borinju -separate with vertical red line.
(Continued an back where necessary) Show water table elevations on dam -site borivs.
Flom,;MINININININIMIi
■
l■I■l��■I■l■�■
i■�■�■1■�■l■�■
��I■(■I■I■1■f"��q��f■f■f�f■I�fel�f■f■I�f■i■fef■I
-.;�I■i■l■I■I■i�!!�'I�I�Ii■I■l■I■i■I■�■I■1■1■I■1■l■
!,�JA�
■I■I■1■
■
■
■'■L■
■I■I■i■
■I■{■I■
■I■I■I■I■
�e■etl■�e�l■t■Ia1®le;el■�■lirl■t■t■�l■t��el■r���■����■
I�■I■I■I■I■I■I■l■I■I■I■I■lel■l■I■l■I■I■!■I■iOl■
u�1�■elil■�el��el�l■lee
ell■I�'lil■I■I�l■i■i■I■I■l0l■il�
O■I■I■i■1■I■1e
■I■I■i�irle��1■lei■i■I�I■1■le
■
s« �­: er4 1S0a K 1•a 5oOAS; 41,07"•►,si 41jod't-es P�- r" /yyv PAY&- 2.3 3

JI _
'.b
TYPES OF tnATERL&L ENCO1111TERM IN, BORINGS
g - gravel
vcos - very coarse sand . , _.,
cos - coarse sand .�.. ' :.. '
a - sand
fs - fine sand
vf6 -very fine Band'^
]cos - loamy coarse Band
Is - loamy sand
Us - loamy fine sand
al - sandy loam
fsl - fine sandy loam
vfal, very fine sandy loam
gal - gravelly sandy loam
1- loam _
gl - grayelly loam...
stl - stony loam -
si - silt
sal - Belt loam
cl - clay loam
Biel - silty clay loam
scl - sandy, clay loam
stcl - stony clay loam
sic - silty clay
c - clay
I.. Suitable material for embankment -is available ea No andlcate where located on the sketch on
naxrse sldel
REMARKS:
2. Explain hazards requiring special attention in design (Segm m ;prljp,. rock etr l
GENERAL RFMAIM:
24
25
26
27
28
29
1 30
31
1 321133
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
46
46
47
48
49
50
51

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUP "ARE �� NC-ENG--12
Soil Conservation Service _= 6-82
EARTHWORK COMPUTATION SHEET
EARTH EMBANKMENT
Name p4aI r-t k e—
Address
Embankment: Top Width 1 U� Side Slopes
STATION
FILL
HEIGHT
(Feet)
END AREA
(Sq. Ft.)
SUM OF
END AREAS
(Sq. Ft.)
DISTANCE
( Feet)
DOUBLE
VOLUME
(Cu. Ft. )
a o0
o
g
43
.S' 4/.!
a
_4b-
`S S•
�: bJJ
0
z v 6 0
.3,"t-3-3
..
SS
n
"Z 5 Al
1. Double Volume of Fill s 2 '
• ;2. 1< 2 7 '1 Cu. Ft. 2. Volume of embankment fill (line ! -t 27) _ % T
e
,._ Cu. Yds.
3. Allowance for settlement J or 10% of line 2) _ -7 9 _ Cu. Yds.
4. Total cubic yards (line 2 + line 3) = ,4 7 Cu. Yds.
Computed by AZ Date • /4' ��
Checked by A-9W Date /- / U 41
!7
I

WORKSHEET EDENTON , N .. ,.0 .
' 1C7/8r• .
DESIGN DATA FOR SWINE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
_14J�liL QQAX&__FARM'-fs'_GOUNTY
r
_�
Di stance; .to .nearest res-i dq?nc•e (other- than owner) Lo GW4 _feet
1. Steady State Live Weight'
_----___Sows x lbs. ------ -Ibs.
Soars x _-__-- I b s . --------- lbs.
-_____-litters x ___-_pigs/fitter x
_--_ -__Ibs./pig -------
lbs.
sows (farrow to finish) x 1417 lbs. _ Ibs,
_-_-_---_-sows (farrow to feeder) x 522 lbs. _--�___- Wlbs
_Z/E'2Q__head (finishing only) x 4a6- lbs. -- 2?. Ibs.
Total' Steady State Live Weight (SSLW) - ? LLbs.
2. Reguired Liquid Volume of Lagnon
Volume = -Z2Zj lbs. SSLW x 1 cu. ft./lb SSLW x i cu. yd./Z7 cu. ft.
Volume = _¢ cu. yds.
3.. Normal
Lagonn Li'guid Level
-•r
Maintain
normal lagoonn liquid
level at ___ feet
(above)(q�elow'
average
ground.
Lagoon
size (for normal 1agowrr
liquid volume) (from
tables or
calculations using prismadial .formula)
Length
_y.K.-_..__ft, Width _
`_.ft... Depth-�g--ft.
s:s �-e1.
Surf a
area norma I l i �au�v
I e1'.
��t,...
Le6t. x dth
_ _��q
_
ft.
se e a }} cxc 11 MQ r*
Actual
volume at normal lagoon
liquid level $��___
cu. yds.
.(Actual
volume must be greater
than required volume).'
4". Volume of Lagrjon to be Excavated,
Length ft. Width ft. Depth _-----ft.
Depth
Vo I ume = ----- (Area o� top f area bottom + 4 x area of midsection)
6
Volume - ______Jcu. yds,
e . a 44 aac h me nis .
8'r'F(0, 9 yd s
r�

6. D i ke 't
,d ump out pond, if needed).
6. TemeorarY Storage Required
Drainage Area: r 3-6V/3- ,f L
[(YZ`x Z7y'}-r�.$x8D7
Laggon (top of' spo I I)
Lengthft. x Width —^-_ft. - _----�_-sq. ft.
FXf-5 .� Oah
(top of spoil)
Length L�b-_ft. x Width _Dft. _ _j�,�Qo�)sq. ft.
u.i I d i ngs ( roof and lot water)
Length ft. x Width ------- ft. = sq. ft.
TOTAL DA=3/3_sq . f t .
Pumping cycle is to be _f �Qdays.
6A. Volume of 25 year - 24 sour storm.
Volume = �,2in. x 0.0833 ft./in. x DA 4Y' 3_3q. ft.
Volume = -2 Z..*u. ft.
a NOTE: Use 25 year724hour rainfall for your location from
Engineering Field Manual, Chapter 2.
613. Vol ume -of ra i,nfa l I i n .excess of - evapprat i-on.:. Us,e per i,od of
time wheny rainfalI exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
R a i n f a l l (g�_P,c__ 1 t o (_Rarr �,) _-1�,Z_ in.
Evaporat i on .. - rl�_ in.
'Excess rainfal I (difference)n..
Volume `_' Jp� in. x 0.0833 ft./in. x DA-c}Wjsq. ft.
Volume =-_�_7S9�lcu. ft.
NOTE: Above information can be found in "Weather and Climate
in North Carolina" Agricultural Experiment Station Bul-
letin 396. Ra i of a l -I data is in Table 1. Evaporation
is from Figure 12 or Figure 13 depending on location
which is most nearly like yours.
6

.
�y
h
.`6C.
Volume
of Waste Produced
:
Volume'
SSLW x 0.'01 ga
I I on/ I b 'SSLW/day x _�7�5_days i n
pumping cycle x 0.1337
:Fu.
Volume
=-------lbs x 0.01 x
_------days x 0.1337
Volume'
cu,. ft.
_
6D.'
Vo I urne
of Wash Water
This is the -amount of fresh water used for washing floors or
volume of fresh water used for flush system. Flush systems
that recirculate the lagoon water are accounted for,in 6C.
Volume - ---___ -gallon/day x ------- days in cycle
x0.1337-cu. ft./gallon
?' Volume cu. ft.
TOTAL REQUIRED'TEMPORARY STnRAGE
*6A. z42_4JR,5cu. ft.
*68. cu. ft.
6C. c u- ft.
6D . _ _,_ u, f t .
TOTAL 9� 1a¢�� u f t . = 3 &LS,5.,,6 .
*Impounde•d lagoons and lagoons that do not have -all -outside water
diverted must include volume contributed by add„i t,i oval area..
n oo V%
7. Depth of Storage Required i
D e p yr a ivi e y ur ace rea
o r p 5pout pond'
q .
1 ft-
����:
�nTop 07 sp�5 i 1 e I e -¢&xt.
lagoon e I ev. _30•4' _ft.
Difference f] _f t .
Y0lurne Ct' exiS-4n.9 14!,C1&1
Depth required �- _ft.
+ Freeboard I_p _ft.
Tot. Depth req. _JAL-9-_ft.
NOTE: If -the depth of storage plus -one foot•for freeboard doos'not
e x c- eed the d i f f•erence i n e I evat i ors of the top of spo 1 1 and
pormaI I,ago.on l,i.quid level, adequate storage'has been provided.
7':

. ,, r 7 ✓-• fin' yx;' P� 1, } r � i
6#,
S. Amount ofN_i trogenProduced 4
• - qs if `.i Li F "'7 ' 3 J F':! 3`i y� C� v i� c. f kA ' ♦ .[
N = ,0.00043 I bs.t/day x -� 8� b tlas ;SSLWL x 365 d ays�year�u �4
N a 3 I bM`/ u •a t C? ;r ' era sr�. 1,
1t s.year
Y `.
IL From AGRICULTURAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FIELD MANUAL"-'(AWMFM) Table 1 -3
Nitrogen losses associated with anaerobic lagoon system ;and applying
o-++nss the surface'of the land by spraying or,'I•i'quid:-spreading (item
Nitro-9en losses = 75%
Nitrogen available 25'/. ..
N..Ibs./year x 0.25
N I fas . /year
9.
From AWMFM Table 11-6
The rate of nitrogen mineralization for effluent from an aerobic or.
anerobic lagoon'appreciably diluted is 49%.
N = .. `� . I bs . /year x' 0.'49
l bs./year to be d i spos'ed•
Land App Iicat ion of Effluent for Nitre en Dis osaI
Use ^A Terk, G u;de Sec♦•� , PS. (033
e- - f.
corn (gra
corn (grain)
Coastal bermudagrass
'-_------- -
- -----------
Fate ' of 'Ut i I 'i zat i on
Yield/Acre eauirements
100 bu.' 90
Ie% U. ISO
tons 300 ;
-------- ---/----- z-.-.....
ACrC6 needed -Pr (ar►d
067a &C/ head Jc
. 01641L /kead A
Acres
anirrri 1

Application Rate _---inches per hour
Application Amount ______inches
NOTE: Information on application rates and amounts for various
so i I s and crops can be found in the Spr i nk l et- Irrigation
Guide - Technical Guide - Section II-G. Effluent should
be applied at a rate so that there is absolutely no run-off.
Des i fined:.
Date
Approved:_
Date:'___,/--- --------------

-------' ----/7 � �����
/
u
. . .

COMPUTATION SHEET i' - fj�rS. DEPARTMENT OF�AG.RICULTURE ; •,f ,
SCS-ENG-522 REV. 3-69 l + `AL CONSERVATION.SERVICE" '
ST TC PROJECT
f awl L-7rake Go
BY A TLC CHECKED BY DATE JOB.
SU93JECT �?
FOR 7�c��+l YOL V%71 C�1LC V«?r �p/1/5 3NEETlop
.O1+
I _
!i

Z/
b °1 !
Y , 2 'aG% x ,-41'z �) r z x , SS3) ��' = (°j1
z
/ --- + % p 0
as.ha I

PP,.F.TMZNT OF AGRICUT THE NC-Ei3G-12
-yation Service 6-82
EARTHWORK COMPUTATION SHEET
EARTH EMBANKMENT
Name �a t �►'a IC er
Address
Embankment: Top.Width 1 U� Side Slopes
STATION
FILL
HEIGHT
(Feet)
END AREA
(Sq.Ft.)
SUM OF
END AREAS.
(Sq.Ft. 1
DISTANCE
(Feet)
DOUBLE
VOLUME
(Cu.Ft. )
6 too
•,, ,;
;;. r77.
.�-
3 t33
3
S.5
�
z ,s
1. Double Volume of Fill t 2 Z 7 z1 Cu. Ft.
2. Volume of embankment fill (line L t 27) =__717, 9 cu. Yds.
3. Allowance for settlement (i or 10% of line 2) _ % Cu. Yds.
4. Total cubic yards (line 2 + line 3) / Cu. Yds.
Computed by �XAz Date �Z•�i%'-
Checked by Date - / 4)
M

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Derr T. Stevens, Director
Paul Drake
Drake Farms
Rt 2 Box 364
Pinetops NC 27864
Dear Paul Drake;
Iffl?0WA
IT
A&41V 0 2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
t.100V
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 33=26
Edgecdintie'Cotinty
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
SincX lx�7
ere]
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Edgecombe County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: PAUL DRAKE
Location: ROUTE 1 BOX 364
PINETOPS NC 27864
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Existing Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals: 1690.00 hogs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
r-`
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1690 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 3211 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
1690 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 3887 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
------
or
-------
APPLY
REBID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
1626
1-1
Jo
FP
3.2
120
1.8
216
I
SEP-APR
1626
1-2A
iJo
3.2
�FP
1120 1
11.5
1180SEPAPR
1626
2-2B
BP
4.1
jKeB
I
I
1153.751
11.6
1246
APR-SEP
1626
2-2B
KeB
WA
I
12.5
175 1
11.6
1120
5iP-1f AR
1626
2-3
BP
4.4
jKeB
I
14.1
1153.751
1676.5
APR-SEP
1626
-2-3
jKeB
IWA
I
12.5
175
14.4
1330
S610--mr4p,
I ! lI
TOTALI1768.5
-- - Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Pq � J� t5l
Page: 3

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
TYPE
CROP
CODE
YIELD
POUNDS
AW N PER
AC
COMM N
PER AC OR
RESID. N
ACRES
LBS AW N
USED
APPLIC
TIME
1656
2A
KeB
j WA
2.5
125
0
4.5
562.5
OCT. -MAR
1656
213
KeB
WA
2.5
125
0
2.2
275
OCT. -MAR
1656
2A
KeB
Cotton
550
49.5
0
4.5
222.75
APR - SEP
1656
26
KeB
Cotton
550
49.5
0
2.2 11
108.9
APR - SEP
1627
3-5
AuB
WA
3
90
0
2.43
218.7
SEP - MAR
1627
3-5A
AuB
j WA
3
90
0
0.4
36
SEP - MAR
1627
3A-5
AuB
I SA
3
112.5
0
2.43
273,375
APR -AUG
1627
3A-5A
AuB
SA
3
112.5
0
0.4
45
APR - AUG
1627
3-6
AuB
WA
3
90
0
1.6
144
SEP - MAR
1627
3A-6
AuB
SA
3
112.5
0
1.6
180
APR-AUG
1627
4-6A
AuB
BP
4.1
153.75
0
1.7
261.375
APR -SEP
1627
4-6A
AuB
WA
2.5
75
0
1.7
127.5
SEP - MAR
1627
4-7
AuB
BP
4.1
153.75
0
4.9
753.375
APR - SEP
1627
4-7
AuB
WA
2.5
75
0
4.9
367.5
SEP -MAR
1627
4-8
AuB
BP
4.1
153.75
0
2.7
415.125
APR -SEP
1627
4-8
AuB
WA
2.5
75
0
2.7
202.5
SEP -MAR
4193.6
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1
9.3
1768.5
TABLE2
24A6
4193.6
TOTAL
34.16
6962.1
AVAILABLE N
3897
SURPLUS OR DEFICIT
2076.1
Fields 2A and 2B were added to the waste management plan. This scenario reflects cotton followed
by a winter annual crop that will be removed and not grazed.
Revised by: Date: 910
Facility Owner: Date: 3 X 4
Facility Manager: Date:

TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
TYPE
CROP
CODE
YIELD
POUNDS
AW N PER
AC
COMM N
PER AC OR
RESID. N
ACRES
LBS AW N
USED
APPLIC
TIME
1656
2A
KeB
WA
2.5
93.75
0
4.5
421.875
OCT, - MAR
1656
2B
KeB
WA
2.5
93.75
0
2.2
206.25
OCT. -MAR
1656
2A
KeB
Cotton
550
49.5
0
4.5
222.75
APR - SEP
1658
2B
KeB
Cotton
550
49.5
0
2.2
108.9
APR - SEP
1627
3-5
AuB
WA
3
90
0
2.43
218.7
SEP - MAR
1627
3-5A
AuB
WA
3
90
0
0.4
36
SEP -MAR
1627
3A-5
AuB
SA
3
112.5
0
2.43
273.375
APR-AUG
1627
3A-5A
AuB
SA
3
112.5
0
0A
45
APR - AUG
1627
3-6
AuB
WA
3
90
0
1.6
144
SEP - MAR
1627
3A-6
AuB
SA
3
112.5
0
.1.6
180
APR-AUG
1627
4-6A
AuB
BP
4.1
153.75
0
1.7
261,375
APR - SEP
1627
4-6A
AuB
WA
2.5
75
0
1.7
127.5
SEP -MAR
1627
4-7
Au6
BP
4.1
153.75
0
4.9
753.375
APR -SEP
1627
4-7
AuB
WA
2.5
75
0
4.9
367.5
SEP -MAR
1627
4-8
AuB
BP
4.1
153.75
0
2.7
415.125
APR - SEP
1627
4-8
AuB
WA
2,5 1
751
0
2.7
202.5
SEP -MAR
3984.225
TOTALS FROM TABLES f AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1
9.3
1768.5
TABLE2
24.86
3984.225
TOTAL
34.18
6762.725
AVAILABLE N
3667
SURPLUS OR DEFICIT
1666.726
Fields 2A and 2B were added to the waste management plan. This scenario reflects cotton followed
by a winter annual crop that will be grazed.
Revised by: A f' '/V Date:
Facility Owner: Date: ;z b'
Facility Manager: Date: o�

ABLE 1: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
TYPE
CROP
CODE
YIELD
POUNDS
AW N PER
AC
COMM N
PER AC OR
RESID. N
ACRES
LBS AW N
USED
APPLIC
TIME
1656
2A
KeB
WA
2.5
125
0
4.5
56Z5
OCT -MAR
1656
213
KeB
WA
2.5
125
0
2.2
275
OCT -MAR
1656
2A
KeB
Corn
70
77
0
4.5
346.5
APR - SEP
1656
213
KeB
Corn
70
77
0
2.2
169.4
APR - SEP'
1627
3-5
AuB
WA
3
90
0
2.43
218.7
SEP - MAR
1627
3-5A
AuB
WA
3
90
- 0
0.4
36
SEP -MAR
1627
3-5
AuB
Corn
75
82.5
0
2.43
200.475
APR - AUG
1627
3-5A
AuB
Corn
75
82.5
0
0.4
33
APR-AUG
1627
3A-5
AuB
SA
3
112.5
0
2.43
273.375
APR -AUG
1627
3A-5A
AuB
SA
3
112.5
0
0.4
45
APR - AUG
1627
3-6
AuB
WA
3
90
0
1.6
144
SEP - MAR
1627
3-6
AuB
Corn
75
82.5
0
1.6
132
APR-AUG
1627
3A-6
AuB
SA
3
112.5
0
1.6
180
APR -AUG
1627
4-6A
AuB
BP
4.1
153.75
0
1.7
261.375
APR - SEP
1627
4-6A
AuB
WA
2.5
75
0
1.7
127.5
SEP - MAR
1627
4-7
AuB
BP
4.1
153.75
0
4.9
753.375
APR -SEP
1627
4-7
AuB
WA
2.5
75
0
4.9
367.5
SEP-MAR
1627
4-8
AuB
BP
4.1
153.75
0
2.7 1
415.125
APR - SEP
1627
4-8
AuB
WA
2.5
75
01
2.7 1
202.5
SEP - MAR
3905.825
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1
9.3
1768.5
TABLE2
24.86
4157.08
TOTAL
34.16
6928.68
AVAILABLE N
3887
SURPLUS OR DEFICIT
2038.68
Fields 2A and 2B were added to the waste management plan. This scenario reflects corn followed
by a winter annual crop that will be removed and not grazed.
Revised by: Date:
Facility Owner: Date: -3 6
Facility Manager: Date: 2ke2 J

TABLE 1: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL
TYPE
CROP
CODE
YIELD
POUNDS
AWN PER
AC
COMM N
PER AC OR
RESID, N
ACRES
LBS AW N
USED
APPLIC
TIME
1656
2A
KeB
WA
2.5
93.75
0
4.5
421.875
OCT - MAR
1656
2B
KeB
WA
2.5
93.75
0
2.2
206,25
OCT -MAR
1656
2A
KeB
Corn
70
77
0
4.5
346.5
APR - SEP
1656
2B
KeB
Corn
70
77
0
2.2
169.4
APR - SEP
1627
3-5
AuB
WA
3
90
0
2.43
218.7
SEP -MAR
1627
3-5A
AuB
WA
3
90
0
0.4
36
SEP -MAR
1627
3-5
AuB
Corn
75
82.5
0
2.43
200,475
APR -AUG
1627
3-5A
AuB
Corn
75
82.5
0
0.4
33
APR - AUG
1627
3A-5
AuB
SA
3
112.5
0
2.43
273.375
APR-AUG
1627
3A-5A
AuB
SA
3
112.5
0
0.4
45
APR-AUG
1627
3-6
AuB
WA
3
90
0
1.6
144
SEP -MAR
1627
3-6
AuB
Corn
75
82.5
0
1.6
132
APR-AUG
1627
3A-6
AuB
SA
3
112.5
0
1.6
180
APR -AUG
1627
4-6A
AuB
BP
4.1
153.75
0
1.7
261.375
APR - SEP
1627
4-6A
AuB
WA
2.5
75
0
1.7
127.5
SEP -MAR
1627
4-7
AuB
BP
4.1
153.75
0
4.9
753.375
APR - SEP
1627
4-7
AuB
WA
2.5
75
0
4.9
367.5
SEP - MAR
1627
4-8
AuB
I BP
4.1
153.75
0
2.7
415.125
APR - SEP
1627
4-8
Au6
WA
2.5
75
0
2.7
202.5
SEP - MAR
3905.825
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
TABLE 1
9.3
1768.5
TABLE2
24.86
4157.08
TOTAL
34.16
5926.58
AVAILABLE N
3887
SURPLUS OR DEFICIT
2038.58
Fields 2A and 213 were added to the waste management plan. This scenario reflects Corn followed
by a winter annual crop that will be grazed.
Revised by: MDate: _22L d6) _
Facility Owner: Date:
Facility Manager: Date:

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own -adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
or------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
1627
3-5
AuB
WA
3.0
90
2.43
218.7
1627
I3-5A
JAUB
IWA
13
190 I
1.4
136
f
cp
1627
3A-5
JAUB
SA
3
1112.5 1
12.43
1273.375
W&-AU&
' 627
3A-5A
AuB
SA
3
1112.5 1
1.4
145
R PkAv,
1627
3-6 JAuB
IWA
3
190 1
11.6
1144
1627
3A-6
SA
3
JAUB
1112.5 1
11.6
1180
APR-AUG
1627
4-6A
BP
4.1
JAUB
1153-751
11.7
1261-375
APR-SEP
1627
-4-6A
AuB
IWA
12.5
175
11.7
1127.5
SEP-MAR
1627
4-7
BP
4.1
JAUB
1153.751
14.9
1753.375
APR-SEP
1627
--4-7
WA
2.5
1AuB
175
14.9
1367.5
SEP-MAR
1627
4-8
BP
4.1
1AuB
1153.751
12.7
1415.125
APR-SEP
1627
-4-8
JAUB
IWA
12.5
175 1
12.7
1202.5
SEP-MAR
END
] q
Page:
4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TOTAL 3024.45
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer
annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for
nitrate levels is recommended.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BP
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE
TONS
37.5
FP
TALL FESCUE -PASTURE
TONS
37.5
SA
SUMMER ANNUALS (I.E. Sorghum -Sudan Hybri
37.5
WA
WINTER ANNUALS (I.E. Small Grains, etc.)
.30
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
ACRES
LBS AW N USED
9.3
1768.5
18.16
3024.45
27.46
4792.95
* BALANCE
-905.95
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may,.and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 625.3 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 3126.5
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 10.4216666667 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 25.012 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN.and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
I I I (Application RatelApplic. Amount
Tract l Field I Soil Type l crop 1 (in/hr) l (inches)
I I I I I
1626 11-1 l Jo l FP l .5 I *1
I I I I
1626 1 1-2A I Jo l FP l .5 l *1
I I I I
1626 l 2-2B l KeB l BP l .6. I *1
1626 12-3 l KeB l BP l .6 I *1
i I I I I
1626 l -2-2B I KeB l WA l .6 I *1
I I I I
1626 i -2-3 l KeB I WA l ..6 l *1
I I I i
1627 l 3-5 l AuB l WA l .6 l *1
I I I I I
1627 l 3-5A I AuB I WA l .6 l *1
I I 1 I
1627 1 .'.3-6 1 AuB l WA l .6` l *1
I I I I
_627 l 3A-5 l AuB l SA I .6 l *1
�a
D �$
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
1627
i I
I 3A--5A i
AuB
I
f SA
1
f .6
f
f *1
1627
13A-6 I
AuB
I SA
I .6
I *1
1627
I
14-6A I
AuB
i
I BP
i
i .6
f
1627
I I
1 4-7 f
AuB
I
I BP
I
I .6
!
I *1
1627
I I
f 4-8 i
AuB
i
I BP
i
I .6
I *1
1627
I -4-6A i.
AuB
I WA
I .6
I *1
1627
1
I -4-7 I
AuB
I WA
I .6
I *1
1627
I
I -•4-8 I
I I
AuB
I
f WA
I
I
I .6
I
1
I *1
I
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 120.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
4.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
Page: 9

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1.and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance, in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Bermudagrass Pasture
All bermudagrass pastures are managed as a grazing system. Any excess grass
may be harvested as hay.
Apply 37.5 pounds of nitrogen prior to grazing, then apply 37.5 pounds after
each grazing period or hay cutting until the end of August. Do not exceed
155 pounds of nitrogen per year per acre unless hay is cut from pasture.
When hay is harvested, nitrogen may be increased by 12.5 pounds per acre
per ton of hay harvested up to 4.1 tons. Each ton thereafter nitrogen may
be increased to 50 pounds per ton.
Bermudagrass pasture overseeded with rye
Rye should be drilled in short (3-5 inches tall) bermudagrass stubble before
October 15 at the rate of 1 - 2 bushels per acre. Rye will be managed as
a grazed system. Apply 38.5 pounds of nitrogen for rye growth between
September 15 and October 31. An additional 38.5 pounds of nitrogen may be
applied to rye in February and March. If rye is cut for hay, an
additional 12.5 pounds of nitrogen may be applied per acre for each ton of
hay harvested. Either cut rye for hay or close graze prior to heading or
April 7, so as not to impede bermudagrass growth. Do no exceed 100 pounds
of nitrogen per acre if cut for hay.
Fescue Pasture
Fescue is a cool season perennial. Manage waste application to provide maximum
growth during these periods. Apply waste in Spring (Feb -Apr) and Fall
(Sept -Nov). Apply waste before Fall and Spring grazing periods and after
each grazing cycle. Do not exceed 120 pounds -of nitrogen per acre per
year unless hay is harvested. An additional 12.5 pounds of nitrogen may
,be added for each ton of hay harvested up to 3.2 tons. Each ton
thereafter nitrogen may be increased to 50 pounds per ton.
'llet
0�
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Millet is a summer annual. Plant in May at a rate of 20 - 30 pounds per acre.
Waste may be applied prior to planting and incorporated into the soil up
to 50 pounds of nitrogen. At 6 to 8 inches tali., apply second application
of nitrogen at a rate of 38.5 pounds of nitrogen. Begin grazing or
harvesting at a height of 12 to 14 inches. Rotate cattle off at 6 inches
tall and apply 38.5 pounds of nitrogen each grazing. You can expect 4 - 5
grazing periods from June to September. Do not exceed 115 pounds of
nitrogen per acres unless hay is harvested. An additional 12.5 pounds of
nitrogen may be added for each ton of hay harvested up to 3 tons. Each
ton thereafter nitrogen may be increased to 50 pounds per ton.
Rye
Rye is a winter annual. Seed rye in September at a rate of 1.6 bushels per
acre. Waste may be applied prior to planting: Apply 50 pounds of
nitrogen at planting and incorporate into soil. When rye is 5 - 10 inches
tall, a second application may be applied. Grazing may begin at 15 - 16
inches tall. After each grazing period, additional nitrogen may be
applied. Do not exceed a total of 90 pounds of nitrogen for entire crop.
An additional 12.5 pounds of nitrogen may be added for each ton of hay
harvested up to 3 tons. Each ton thereafter nitrogen may be increased to
50 pounds per ton.
�hflSq
o�
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the,design folder that the
producer either -owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. .If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or.available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than to tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 --Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody:species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 13

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
.terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a""closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to'prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications -of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 50 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall'be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the.soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste.utiiization.plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new '
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year; 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: PAUL DRAKE
(Please print)
Signature: A, Date: _ 1�
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan:
Affiliation:EDGECOBME SWCD
Address (Agency): P O BOX 10
(Please print)MARGARET KNIGHT
Phone No. 919-641-7900
TARBORO NC 27886-0010
Signature: � Date: S
�1
P�
Page: 15

f
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(ilo.dod only It sddltloasl lsad bss to be lssssd, ota.)
hereby give Q52 1x - /�/�Z-v Z: Pm--e
permission to apply animal waste from Fis. Waste Utilization System
on 7-0 acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date: o
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative: - Date: 11.2 3 J
SWCD Representative: r Date: r
Terms of Agreement: _ � --ro ��( _, 9 to 20�
(Xioiimm of Zen is.rs an Cost SLarsd It■ms)
(See Required Specification No. 2.) -
/ 6

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
I,
ANIMAL WAST& UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
The field(s) on which waste can be applied are shown on the
attached map.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative: Date:
SWCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19_ to
(!Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
Page: 16

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said -County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
, 19
My commission expires
(SEAL)
day of
Notary Public.
Page: 17

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, hereby agree to apply waste
generated by in a manner that meets the
Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste
utilization system that has been accepted in writing by the
Division of Water Quality.
Third Party Receiver: Date:
Term of Agreement: to
(Minimum Ten Years on Cost -Shared Items)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I,
Public of said County, do hereby certify that
, a Notary
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due
execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
, 19
day of
My commission expires
Notary Public.
( SEAL)
Page: 18

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: i Doak .. �t' e Fct,s-v►.
Address:
a 8
Telephone:
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications'
County: �Q e a0VKke—
Date: 3
Field
Number=
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
or Fields
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(•/.}
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate+
(inlhr}
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle,
(inches)
f]stc�tie E:.�r Ca.�cer.'Al
comments
.0 3,0
�•8 �a, O/K
t
fi AI�cQ
.m Y. o
A u.B
A; i
-
Ai14-'Lled
I . P Q .
lY i.�
r
�I J S. i. �� !if CI
All
O
i a
se4 0. C, 41
'Table to be completed in its entirety by Field Office personnel and forwarded to the irrigation system designer.
2See attached reap provided by the Field Office for field location(s).
'Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
'Refer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section 11 G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
Irrigation Parameters USDA -MRCS
October 1996 page-1 North Carolina
9
�r4

TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment. 4L
/1 ad Q O O
Field Not
and
Hydrant No'
Travel
Speed
(fUmin)
Application
Rate
(inthr)
TRAVEL LANE
Effective Effective
Width (ft) Length (n)
Wetted
Diameter
(feet)
EQUIPMENT SETTINGS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Pressure Arc
(inches) @ Gun (psi) Reel (psi) Pattern
Comments
A
'%!s.
33
02 O
.100
310,
310
/•OS,
D0
rrnJAR
-1
• ,.
220
Z,og
0
b
-Al
.33
-22.0
710
8-7-0
3to
400,
70
! O
3Y0
�A - S
1.2-
,33
X,7-0
2a-0
330
•68
70
1140
O v
d-+t) 1- -
- (e
.17
. 33
2.2,0
3o0
q1ol
3ro
f0?
D
to
3 o p
,, tr.
-
.33
zD
710
qA0
3110
.08
70
/10
30
- 8
,9
33
XO t
Yoo
So
3tb].,OR
2C2
/tb
3 0
4�1&
a
:- T..."
/.2
c o
115
.3.Zoo0
z
2,-
TA
—
7L o00
3
i X -
7/0
Y.
28
I1 00St
I• t�
1ao
/14
3
4
Lzr
ado
.o
Ono
7
r.
8 1 o
Zp
G 00
1 a
o0
2• J�
r
p
'See attached map provided by the Field Office for field location(s).
'Show separate entries for each hydrant location In each field.
'Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter).
May also use degree of arc in degrees.
Irrigation Parameters USDA -MRCS
October 1996 page-2 North Carolina
t'..o'a �-
�2yo! f
J►t A.W,e
S,:l j

TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Mode! and Type of Equipment:
Field No'
and
Une Noz
Number of
Hydrants
wetted
Diameter
(feet)
Hydrant Spacing (ft)
Along Between
Pipeline Pipelines
Application
Rate
(tn/hr)
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Nozzle operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Time
(inches) @ Gun (psl) @ Hydrant (hr)
Comments
'See attached map provided by the Field Office for field location(s).
2Show separate entries for each pipeline with hydrants in each field.
Irrigation Parameters USDA -MRCS
October 1995 page-3 North Carolina

TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
Operating Pressure at Pump (psi)
Design Precipitation Rate (Inlhr)
3 3
Hose Length (feet)
12
XXXXXXxx
Type of Speed Compensation
XXXX7(X)CX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications'
Desioner may provide thrust block details on separate sheet.
THRUST BLOCK
LOCATION AREA (sq. ft.)
90' Bend
Dead End 3. %
USDA-NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-DD.
72(40 _ 3.73
�pOO
�y 7Y(eo ,r• 7
Irrigation Parameters USDA -MRCS
October 1996 page-4 North Carolina

Name:
Company:
Address:
Phone:
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
1. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thrust block
locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system.
6. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-NRCS standard for Irrigation Water Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-DD.
8. The information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the
designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address them as appropriate.
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval
of the designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip 2S feet wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perennial
streams and surface waters per DEHNR-DEM Code Section 15A NCAC 2B .0200 - Waste Not Discharged to Surface
Waters.
Irrigation Parameters USDA -MRCS
October 1995 page-5 North Carolina

Narrative of Irrigation, system Operation
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a similar sheet most convinient to the designer/supplier.
Include procedures such as start-up, shut -down, winterization and regular maintenance of all equipment.
Tow thcmachine to the desired hydrant pull out correct amount of hose. Inspect.
gun, gun cart and traveler for any damage or parts which may have come loose during
move. Prime pump, start engine, let idle til pressure starts to rise. Slowly
increasing throttle IE pressure til reaching desired amount. Return -to traveler
crank motor, set reel speed to desired amount. (Inches per Min.)
Shut Down: Slowly return engine to idle reducing pressure to zero. Let engine
idle 30 seconds and shut off. Return to reel making sure engine is off. Move to
next hydrant and do start up procedure again.
Winterization! -and regular maintenance: During prolonged cold periods below
freezing, check engine antifreeze and drain pump housing. Blow adapter is supplied
with reel to remove water from hose. Open drain on gun cart, remove supply hose.
For:_regular,•-maintenance change engine oil every 200 hours, reel engine every 100
hours after break'in. Grease reel once every six (6) months where decals indicate.
Irrigation Parameters USDA-NRCS
October 1995 page-6 North Carolina

."C*'
4 . 4
40
IV
41
1:K y�
I, Y
, - "OP
?T2
' '41
41_,

Cr ' my,G 1.5 f e 1 �i rrw G 7
Iwo jin
i i r
�r,R 'e�t{ '_�• Sv", - ti-. ,1 r�. f ,���.'.' 1 :, S'� -�.
,�`Z� J�:f� t� =�Sl` 1 tiS ! °: ... '1 • '. ' �� '.L `/ •-` y� xµtwb�iAs
�iy 4 r ;i'a5 ry E a Lyu �►'' , J� t:' ,��+firW
kal
'S, , .`ell- �'i 11 u�� •.i��, "Y' 7'?f F74F r '1' _� i. }'t'4��—'�/..' 1 AW;
RY!
. L „'"� �'. �,,'. ,-� s^a^s,a�", •iu1+��-° TAIL
a Err r s� I b;� I.,•: i �. _:I... ry r ,FafiM''
5 sts_ � � �, n- .. �"�.-z ia�. �! t w► \ i -�Y, e�'� .S f. 4]� - } �•
moo
30
1 ' r� t r ��N � //' ! ''�' '' �' � �n �•^t4 r'F y5 ,' iT/l`lr- �r?�_
r ti 9 tit i e
,4iR jf �,�inr ,yrvY 1 ` e a • F- 1�' F` ttT `!- A hi err Iy'"it.Gsr#
{{!��•� � ' ., ",f v��G �1,yt1 i.' \ rt / p 1 _ I ' ,..-
7 �' a5G �i = V� }w �'. v � XT � r 41 � � v,; � i'�. �•' r
"•, y�n,,'�f I 1�, t '``y�1' f.. + �' _i ✓ t IrLt'�� S w.�'r iS. r• rF r w�
-'"R3� ��p�. rr .S' � i y '�• 4. '� \ �,. ' /i•�� �t`�,y} ��16 � . • W -L 1 , � , �?�Y..
."i �r� �W_; Y y�;F��lilt '•. y , y��¢ i.,,�! I`:; G � S . ri ,. � �.^'t�i� i i ?
{; --�'i:'�. `' ::. Rye r f `.:}I•r ."'i,'"i4 "�I ,.'�. , ; sfi :.. y� �4 " �.'`, �r '
�s'y�P_ry ' � � �"•�`y' ��'YT1r t � e r. , s�� S i, i.
TL
�., � N.r'�fy�'.i 9'} by �� ,f,�' J"jY k�N+r��•`�Y�'04� ! 1'rsib 5 - :TufNYr '�•� C�' y1 N'fr)i +��s+y2nr�&V h F� � R//
20"
f; 44
r
if ',"jj.. .allijt
60,
r� yyAL L
r,,, ri S�a�k''y t7 �It
G ��i. ly�.''�_.i 4'r r'y��r� ,G 'f'3r��,�+7ry �.� qyjrK«� 9 .� 1 � ''\ ,%. ;iL �/"y ..,•;: ' �
i'. n a k f11 Sl r6;=la:n �i'._F�r 4 Yy- '� "w'� ,/ _L► ��L°F`�r
.� yy y, 1
„-gY+i�li t�r'kM1.��1 r� .Ly 1':!•+ �'.. G L- S7.J �"�3` �[ "1
E. L+ �w. y�•.f ";.r: �.,. Yf r+�l. rr ,2- �r_9:: /��� ir� :+' y��"C,J 1•A+i� t .
1f:y �. i� �'•'
r6.�1 f' }. i;� +•�.,
�� r •,�57,. � �' Y ,�31, ,��' -y���•'..�1'
} }Yq µ' _ ~ •`� 'Y+ .'S'.. .r+yl�f' r+'�i 'Y#:; +.'�.�I`` +�i.- ' r• r _ �' ;•.. �(ij*�..','. ., ""•�L'd./ i

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
March 25, 1999
Drake Farms
Rt 2 Box 364
Pinetops NC 27864
Attn: Paul Drake
IT
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS330026
Additional Information Request
Drake Farms
Animal Waste Operation
Edgecombe County
Dear Paul Drake:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by April 24, 1999:
The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) submitted does not show any application windows for the winter
annuals or for the summer annuals. Please contact your technical specialist and have these added to your
plan.
The lagoon capacity documentation submitted is not clear. 1 understand that there are three lagoons at this
facility. Are the two older lagoons acting as primary and secondary lagoons? It was difficult to decipher
which calculations were for which lagoons. Please indicate the total capacity for each of the three lagoons
at this facility. Please show the amount of permanent and temporary storage and the number of days of
temporary storage for each lagoon (WUP indicates 180 but calculations show 120).
All land in your WUP is listed in table 1. Table 1 is titled "acres owned by producer". However, there is a
waste utilization agreement included in the application package. Please indicate which land the producer
owns and which land is utilized through a third party agreement. Also, on the map submitted, fields 2 and
5 are highlighted but these do not appear in the WUP. Please verify that these fields are not used for waste
disposal. If they are, they will need to appear in the WUP.
Your WUP lists the nitrogen application rate for a small grain overseed into Bermuda grass as 102.5
pounds per acre. The Sixth Guidance Memorandum to Technical Specialists dated August 18, 1997 states
that only 50 pounds of nitrogen per acre should be applied to small grain overseeded into Bermuda grass.
Current guidance allows for 100 pounds of nitrogen per acre under strict management practices as
mentioned in the memo included with this letter. Please have your technical specialist reduce the nitrogen
rate on the rye overseed to 50 pounds per acre or incorporate the attached management practices into the
narrative of the WUP for the application of 10 pounds of nitrogen per acre.
The yields and nitrogen application rates listed in your WUP for millet are higher than currently
recommended. Please contact your technical specialist in order to have the yields and nitrogen application
amounts reduced or have these justified in the narrative section of the WUP.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All
information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information
requested by this letter must be submitted on or before April 24, 1999 or the Division will return your application as
incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 33-0026
Paul Drake
Page 2
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364.
Sincerely,
TTU"'s
Dianne Thomas
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc:[Rdkjjh.Regional"Office; Water QEality�
PerMit File `— - '.. —"

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James S, Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A.J. and Paul Drake
Drake Farms
Rt 1 Box 364
Pinetops NC 27864
AEI--INR
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Drake Farms
Facility ID#: 33-26
Edgecombe County
Dear Messrs. Drake:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 91gn33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. e a r., , Dir for
Division'of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O, Box 27687. W .
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 �� An Equal Opportunity/Afffmative action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/100/. post -consumer paper