20050170 Ver 1_Complete File_20050131

O?O? W AT ?9pG
o ?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 20, 2005
Anvil Investments
100 Weston Estates Way
Cary, NC 27513-6040
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 05-0170
Wake County
Subject Property: Wrenn Meadow Subdivision
UT to Camp Branch [03-04-03, 27-43-15-5, C NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Sir or Madam:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.006 acres of wetlands, 139 feet of streams and 12,795 square feet (ft) of
protected riparian buffers for the purpose of a residential subdivision at the subject property, as described
within your application dated January 27, 2005 and received by`the N.C. Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) on January 26, 2005 and all additional information submitted and received on March 4, 2005.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality
Certification Number(s) 3402 (GC3402). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 39
when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved
Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0233. In
addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits
before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and
Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
401 Oversight/Express Review Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]/ FAX [phone]/ Internet: htta://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands
one
N Carolina
.?tura!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Anvil Investments
Page 2 of 3
4/20/05
Amount Approved
nits Plan Location or Reference
Stream 139 feet 1 of 2
404 Wetlands .006 acres 1 of 2
Buffers 12,795 (square ft.) 1 1 of 2
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
4. All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected
stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within
15A NCAC 2B .0233(5).
5. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an
NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued
to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this
permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance
with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping
and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may
be found at http•//l12o enr.state.nc.u.s/sulFornis Documentr.htm.
6. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
Anvil Investments
Page 3 of 3
4/20/05
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
7. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have
any questions, please telephone John Dorney or Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/dae
Enclosures: GC 3402
Certificate of Completion
cc: Kevin Martin-S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050170 WrennMeadow(Wake)401+buffer
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Wrenn Aleadow Subdivision c/o Anvil Investments
Project Number 05 0170
Recvd From APP
Received Date 1/26/05 Recvd By Region
Project Type Subdivision
Michael Horan
KPn SrhtjstPr
County Wake
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
39 OTH FT O -N 27-43-15-5 F-c - NSW 30,403. 0.01 139.00
NBR Buffers O Y O N I 27_43-15-5 ?C FNSW 30,403. 0.00 F
F___ F-O Y O N
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 00 Issue 0 Issue/Coed 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 354149 Longitude (ddmmss) 784149
Comments:
Please put on-hold. I Man on talking to Sean Clark today during our site visit. Have questions about.
I/P call and minimization & avoidance. (Michael Horan 2/11/05) 1 talked with Sean Clark on 2/11/05
and it was determined that I should talk with Kevin Martin. I will give him a call today and see when -L
can meet with him. (2/14/05 Michael Horan) Received new info on March 15, 2005. Issue with your
ok. 3/21/05
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number „1
Triage Check List
ar? I 2?0
Date:
Project Name:
l?ufQ,??? rMC?c?Ow S?.?o???, 3?'dr?
DWQ#: 0 5 0 k-?o
County: UV?40
To: ? ARO
? FRO
? MRO
121 RRO
Kevin Barnett
Ken Averitte
Alan Johnson
Mike Horan
? WaRO Tom Steffens and Kyle Barnes
? WiRO Noelie Lutheran
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
From: Telephone : (919) 7 c? I

The file attached is being forwarded to dour for your evaluation.
Please call if you need .asst}stance.
? Stream length impacted 4
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse,.Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
! Qy?`S?v?s Con s, S ? c U , f G??irPtr
Comments: A(,? -Os,
Wrenn Meadow Subdivision #050170
Subject: Wrenn Meadow Subdivision #050170
From: Steve Kroeger <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:29:03 -0500
To: Eric Kulz <[e-mail]>, Mike Horan <[e-mail]>
Eric, Mike
We received some clarifications regarding the Wrenn Meadow Subdivision project in
Wake Co. that you have been involved with. There have been a variety of reviewers
for this project and I wanted to know if were going to add any additions to the the
Wetland Staff Report and Recommendations based upon your conversations with S&EC.
Part of the clarifications were the level spreader calculations, etc. -- but my guess
is you do not have these and we could review those items here; we can also forward
the clarifications, maps, etc to you. Thanks.
--Steve Kroeger
Steve Kroeger <[e-mail]>
Program Development Coordinator - Watershed Assessment Team
NC Division of Water Quality
[phone]
1 of 1 3/10/2005 10:32 AM
Uj u1'7C)
o
° t Soil Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
I -":" - V:/ r 19
MAR 0 4 2005

NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Debbie Edwards
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Additional Information Requested
Wrenn Meadow Subdivision
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Edwards and Mr. Kulz:
March 3, 2005
S&EC Project #7797.W1
NC-DENR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. Eric Kulz
3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
G f7
NIAR 0 ; pis
ItETU,% r'3 '%: J ;>IV i.a?.,11?Cf1 :,.. ?...•fl
We received your request for more information dated February 14, 2005. To address the
items requested in your letter we have prepared the following.
Impact Clarification (requested per our conversation)
The impact to perennial channel is resulting from the installation of a pond outlet pipe
and associated dissipater pad as well as the construction of the fill slope required to
construct the road. The new outlet pipe is necessary for three reasons. First, the existing
outlet pipe is old and requiring maintenance. Secondly, the 6" PVC is vastly undersized.
As the site becomes developed, the need for retention in this pond makes the current pipe
inadequate. And third, the pipe is required for the installation of the road. The reason that
the proposed pipe is not being installed in the salve location as the existing pipe is to
protect the integrity of the dam. The 139 linear feet of perennial channel impact is
calculated from the outlet of the existing pond outlet pipe to the point at which the
redirected channel will enter the existing channel. The pipe will be installed by an open
cut method which will temporarily impact the buffers at the pond edge. The Impact
Maps that were previously submitted did not show the impacts to buffers from the pipe
installation (excavation, grading, and rip-rap). We have attached a revised PCN and
Impact Maps to show all of the buffer impacts resulting from the pipe installation.
1. You requested that we schedule a site visit with Eric Kulz from the Regional
Office. As per our conversation, a meeting with Eric Kulz was not scheduled
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
because we are not contesting the perennial / buffered status of the stream. I
called Mr. Kulz on February 22 to confirm that a site visit was not necessary. He
agreed.
2. You requested that we show all stream impacts including all fill slopes,
dissipaters, and culverts on an impacts map with a scale of 1:50. Attached is a
1:50 scale map that meets your request.
3. You requested that we provide cross sectional details showing the provisions for
aquatic life passage. As per our conversation no provision for aquatic life passage
will be made. The proposed outlet pipe is not a culvert. The pipe will run from
the surface of the pond approximately straight down to the pond floor and then
approximately horizontal through the existing dam and the proposed fill slope to
the outlet. The current outlet pipe does not allow for aquatic passage so the
proposed construction will not change the status of the stream system.
4. You requested indication of diffuse flow. The attached overall site plan shows the
location of the proposed level spreaders.
5. Your requested level spreader worksheets. The level spreader worksheets are
attached.
6. You requested a detailed breakdown of the proposed built out impervious area for
your review. The requested information is displayed in a table on the 1 "=50' scale
impact area map.
7. You asked what the purpose of the proposed pipe is and why it was not included
in the impact table. The purpose of the pipe is, as previously mentioned, to update
the existing pipe which is undersized and in need of maintenance. The proposed
pipe is also required to allow the construction of the road. The proposed pipe will
end at the edge of the proposed fill slope.
Sincerely,
Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments:
a: Revised PCN
b: Revised Impact Maps
c: 1"=50' Scale Impact Area Map
d: Overall Site Plan (3 Sheets)
e: Level Spreader Worksheets
» ?. 1J,4R G ' 007
Office Use Only: Fonn Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. ti"jUy rDWQ No. CS I 'l C
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing?! ? u z
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39 and 3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ® (only if required)
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Anvil Investments
Mailing Address: 100 Weston Estates Way
Cary, NC 27513-6040
Telephone Number: (919)481-300 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: SClark(a?SandEC.com
Pagel of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Wrenn Meadow
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0760.02-58-4553
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Wrenn Meadow
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The project site is located along
Ten -Ten Road (SR 1010adjacent to the intersection of Ten-ten Rd. and Van Gogh Ln..
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035°41'49.22"N, 078°41'49.22"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 41.77 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Camp Branch
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The property is currently a mixture of forested and early
successional cover. There are also several existing homes. Much of the adjacent propert y has
been developed for residential use.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
overall project is the development of a residential subdivision. The impact involves the
installation of a road over an existing farm road at the dam of a pond. The installation will
require a new overflow pipe to be installed as well as grading and filling.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The construction of the subdivision is to meet
local demand for housing. The purpose of the road crossing is to provide access to the
southern portion of the property. The new outlet pipe is required to allow the placement of
fill for the construction of the road. The new overflow pipe is also considered maintenance of
the pond because the existing outlet pipe is old and insufficient.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC performed a detailed wetland delineation on May 29, 2003. The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers issued a notification of jurisdictional determination on December 11, 2003 (Action ID:
200320200).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 8
I . Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impact involves the
construction of a new pond outlet pipe as well as a road over an existing farm road located at
the dam of the pond on the property. Impacts will result from the installation of the new
outlet pine as well as the fill required for road construction. The construction will produce
impacts to perennial stream channel, jurisdictional wetlands, and Neuse Buffers. A temporary
open water impact will result from the installation of the new outlet pipe.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
1C NWP 39 Fill/Grading 0.00068 No 5' Emergent
1D NWP 39 Fill/Grading 0.0027 No 0' Emergent
lE NWP 39 Fill/Grading 0.0029 No 0' Emergent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fcini.2o .
*** List a wctland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wctland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.5 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.00628 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma linear feet Before Impact leasespecify)
IC NWP 39 Fill / Culvert 139 UT to Camp Branch 3' Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightcning, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps arc available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usas.cov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.coin,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 139 Linear Feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) ) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on ma acres bay, ocean, etc.
I H NWP 3 Temporary / Drainage 0.01 Unnamed Pond Pond
Page 4 of 8
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
A road crossing is necessary to access the southern portion of the property because the
y
stream, including the pond, extends from the eastern property boundary to the western propert
boundary. The applicant has minimized the impacts to streams and buffers by proposing the road
crossing where there is an existing farm road. The new outlet pipe is necessary for three reasons.
First, the existing outlet pipe is old and requiring maintenance. Secondly, the 6" PVC is vastly
undersized. As the site becomes developed, the need for retention in this pond makes the current
pipe inadequate. And third, the pine is required for the installation of the road. The reason that
the proposed pipe is not being installed in the same location as the existing pipe is to protect the
integrity of the dam.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
Page 5 of 8
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgidc.htmi.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The DWQ will not require mitigation because the impacts to wetlands, streams, and
buffers are all below the mitigation thresholds. Because impacts to wetlands are less than
0.10 acre and the open water impact is temporary the impacts to perennial channel were
minimized we believe that the US Army Co!ps of Engineers should not require mitigation.
However if mitigation is required we propose that payment be made to the NCEEP.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional infonnation regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.statc.ne.us/wrp/index.litm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 139' if required by Corps
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
Page 6 of 8
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify, )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Permanent
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 7,535 3 NA
2 4,770 1.5 NA
Total 12,305 NA
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Temaorarv
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 490 3 NA
2 0 1.5 NA
Total 490 NA
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular froin near bank of channel; "Lone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 8
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0260.
NA, Buffer activities are exempt or allowable.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
An approved stormwater plan is not required because the projects proposed impervious surface
percentage is 26% according to the engineer (Withers & Ravenel)
XII. SeNvage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Project will tic into existing sewer.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
?,?? / rl?! .? 31'3
Applicant/Agent's Signatµre' bate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
WITHERS & RAVEN EL WRENN MEADOW
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS WETLANDS IMPACT MAP
III WdCmm G4" fay, NaN Co." 27511 Id 911-4&2-MQ `= 619-07-" CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DWQ Project

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : W K 6.1V A) AISADOW
Contact Person: T'EO GKEDLE
Level Spreader ID: - FE5 Lo
Level Spreader Length
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope
grass
Phone Number: (919 ) 4104 '33 4 0
(011 ft. (perpendicular to flow)
1 . So ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
D . 8 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
8 % (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm S, 3 cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader S, 3 cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation F. l k-r Sf-RP o u d
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method 4J A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
T_G• Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
T.? No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
-,
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
7-1
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please con
Project Name : J_ J R E.1VAu
Contact Person: Ted C "-d I
Level Spreader ID: _ FGS 30
Phone Number: O 9!9 - ¢Lp -33tD
Level Spreader Length z t 2 ft. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 4.70 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area Z .+b ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope & % (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)'
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm 1 L .3 cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader t to • 3 cfs
J
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation ; l1t.r Sti o OJ (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method A 31A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
TG Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
G • No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
the following information):
4DoW

;rr)
YVH
Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No
uS1
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WOR SHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : 6J K E Nnl M EA DOW C..„ ,
Contact Person: T M 641j fiBcD Phone Number: Ji I
Level Spreader ID: FES 40
Level Spreader Length !a z ft.
Drainage Area ,• Lt ac.
Impervious Area O • (o `}- ac.
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope S %
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm G.3 cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader G-3 cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation F;1H_e SI rip V"
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Al A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
r r?
DWQ Project No. P '
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
v,,-TL,;
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : W R ENN MEA-Do&J
Contact Person: Teal G,e-4k Phone Number: ( 919) 4G9 --T3,40
Level Spreader ID:. %-CS $d
Level Spreader Length S2 ft.
Drainage Area I s vo ac.
Impervious Area 6.30 ac.
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope 4 %
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm ?}•0 cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 4.o cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation Ft i W 51-r; v U
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method N A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
r_ Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
v
U ? O 17 c,
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
March 3, 2005
S&EC Project #7797.W1
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Debbie Edwards
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Additional Information Requested
Wrenn Meadow Subdivision
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Edwards and Mr. Kulz:
NC-DENR-DWQ
Attn: Mr. Eric Kulz
3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
71-71?
I,.?ra'Z ? ?`- ?007

We received your request for more information dated February 14, 2005. To address the
items requested in your letter we have prepared the following.
Impact Clarification (requested per our conversation)
The impact to perennial channel is resulting from the installation of a pond outlet pipe
and associated dissipater pad as well as the construction of the fill slope required to
construct the road. The new outlet pipe is necessary for three reasons. First, the existing
outlet pipe is old and requiring maintenance. Secondly, the 6" PVC is vastly undersized.
As the site becomes developed, the need for retention in this pond makes the current pipe
inadequate. And third, the pipe is required for the installation of the road. The reason that
the proposed pipe is not being installed in the same location as the existing pipe is to
protect the integrity of the dam. The 139 linear feet of perennial channel impact is
calculated from-the outlet of the existing pond outlet pipe to the point at which the
redirected channel will enter the existing channel. The pipe will be installed by an open
cut method which will temporarily impact the buffers at the pond edge. The Impact
Maps that were previously-submitted did not show the impacts to buffers from the pipe
installation (excavation, grading, and rip-rap). We have attached a revised PCN and
Impact Maps to show all of the buffer impacts resulting from the pipe installation.
1. You requested that we schedule a site visit with Eric Kulz from the Regional
Office. As per our conversation, a meeting with Eric Kulz was not scheduled
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
because we are not contesting the perennial / buffered status of the stream. I
called Mr. Kulz on February 22 to confirm that a site visit was not necessary. He
agreed.
2. You requested that we show all stream impacts including all fill slopes,
dissipaters, and culverts on an impacts map with a scale of 1:50. Attached is a
1:50 scale map that meets your request.
3. You requested that we provide cross sectional details showing the provisions for
aquatic life passage. As per our conversation no provision for aquatic life passage
will be made. The proposed outlet pipe is not a culvert. The pipe will run from
the surface of the pond approximately straight down to the pond floor and then
approximately horizontal through the existing dam and the proposed fill slope to
the outlet. The current outlet pipe does not allow for aquatic passage so the
proposed construction will not change the status of the stream system.
4. You requested indication of diffuse flow. The attached overall site plan shows the
location of the proposed level spreaders.
5. Your requested level spreader worksheets. The level spreader worksheets are
attached.
6. You requested a detailed breakdown of the proposed built out impervious area for
your review. The requested information is displayed in a table on the 1 "=50' scale
impact area map.
7. You asked what the purpose of the proposed pipe is and why it was not included
in the impact table. The purpose of the pipe is, as previously mentioned, to update
the existing pipe which is undersized and in need of maintenance. The proposed
pipe is also required to allow the construction of the road. The proposed pipe will
end at the edge of the proposed fill slope.
Sincerely,
91?1 -64- ?
Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Attachments
a: Revised PCN
b: Revised Impact Maps
c: 1 "=50' Scale Impact Area Map
d: Overall Site Plan (3 Sheets)
e: Level Spreader Worksheets
iJ
:2005
MAR 0
Office Use Only: oL': ?: •`
y• ?:"? i ?;' ;,; • cit
1 L'i Form Version May 2002
t ?Tl.u
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. U J I
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39 and 3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ® (only if required)
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Anvil Investments
Mailing Address: 100 Weston Estates Way
Cary, NC 27513-6040
Telephone Number: (919)481-300 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Pagel of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Wrenn Meadow
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0760.02-58-4553
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Wrenn Meadow
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The project site is located along
Ten -Ten Road (SR 1010) adjacent to the intersection of Ten-ten Rd and Van Gogh Ln
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035°41'49.22"N, 078°41'49.22"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 41.77 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Camp Branch
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The property is currently a mixture of forested and early
successional cover. There are also several existing homes Much of the adjacent property has
been developed for residential use.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
overall project is the development of a residential subdivision The impact involves the
installation of a road over an existing farm road at the dam of a pond The installation will
require a new overflow pipe to be installed as well as grading and filling
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The construction of the subdivision is to meet
local demand for housing. The purpose of the road crossing is to provide access to the
southern portion of the property. The new outlet pipe is required to allow the placement of
fill for the construction of the road. The new overflow pipe is also considered maintenance of
the pond because the existing outlet pipe is old and insufficient
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC performed a detailed wetland delineation on May 29 2003 The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers issued a notification of jurisdictional determination on December 11, 2003 (Action ID:
200320200).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are anticipated at this time
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 8
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:- The proposed impact involves the
construction of a new pond outlet pipe as well as a road over an existing farm road located at
the dam of the pond on the property. Impacts will result from the installation of the new
outlet pipe as well as the fill required for road construction The construction will produce
impacts to perennial stream channel jurisdictional wetlands and Neuse Buffers A temporary
open water impact will result from the installation of the new outlet pipe
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
1C NWP 39 Fill/Grading 0.00068 No 5' Emergent
1D NWP 39 Fill/Grading 0.0027 No 0' Emergent
lE NWP 39 Fill/Grading 0.0029 No 0' Emergent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, 611,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fem-,i.p-ov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.5 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.00628 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma linear feet Before Impact leasespecify)
1C NWP 39 Fill / Culvert 139 UT to Camp Branch -
3' Peremiial
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.eoy. Several internct sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www,tol2ozone.com,
www.mal2quest.coni, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 139 Linear Feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of
Name
Wate Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if
applicable) ) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on ma acres bay, ocean, etc.
1H NWP 3 Temporary / Drainage 0.01 Unnamed Pond Pond
Page 4 of 8
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
A road crossing is necessary to access the southern portion of the property because the
stream, including the pond, extends from the eastern property boundary to the western property
boundary. The applicant has minimized the impacts to streams and buffers by proposing the road
crossing where there is an existin-g farm road. The new outlet pipe is necessary for three reasons
First, the existing outlet pipe is old and requiring maintenance. Secondly, the 6" PVC is vastly
undersized. As the site becomes developed the need for retention in this pond makes the current
pipe inadequate. And third, the pipe is required for the installation of the road The reason that
the proposed pipe is not being installed in the same location as the existing pipe is to protect the
integrity of the dam.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic enviromnent are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
Page 5 of 8
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwet]ands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The DWQ will not require mitigation because the impacts to wetlands streams and
buffers are all below the mitigation thresholds. Because impacts to wetlands are less than
0.10 acre and the oven water impact is temporary the impacts to perennial channel were
minimized we believe that the US Army Corps of Engineers should not require mitigation.
However if mitigation is required we propose that payment be made to the NCEEP.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP` at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP` website at http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):_ 139' if required by Corps
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
Page 6 of 8
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Permanent
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 7,535 3 NA
2 4,770 1.5 NA
Total 12,305 NA
- tone t extends out sU teet perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Temoorarv
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 490 3 NA
2 0 1.5 NA
Total 490 NA
- tone t extends out su feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 8
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
NA, Buffer activities are exempt or allowable.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
An approved stormwater plan is not required because the projects proposed impervious surface
percentage is 26% according to the engineer (Withers & Ravenel)
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Project will tie into existing sewer.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
'r-1 /_4!:" 4- 3
Applicant/Agent's Signat4re, We
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
WITHERS & RAVENEL WRENN MEADOW
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS WETLANDS IMPACT MAP
111 wac~ ar. Co% wxa C.,** va11 tie 811-40-3740 I= 919-487-WW ..._Nmw„o,,,4mm CARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Ru
fu;?
Sao
aq?qOo
UN
N) ho
4boo . i
A
A
cr 4„,(3
aQ '?
02?..
rn
zz°??o
z
'a
-/0
J?JJJ'
0
-Ij
kn/

want r- u
Date
1? M h. hrv
ly Job No.
is 20]141
o
n
°w° h oa=
fia4 a CL
a °
W a
CL Q C4 0
a o 2-ck? 0Q
IL 0: Q
?? ha
WRENN MEADOW
CART RAKE COLNI) NORTH CAROLINA
Uu?
a
S
-yo n
'Ll
Wo?in
a" ~a
1
to
O??N
?n
Q co
r§pOVERALL WETLANDS IMPACT PLAN

a?
ova
to
$w?
N \
J 1()
lit
PROPOSED WETLAND IMPArz-q
ROAD CROSSING
IMPACT
LOCATION
TYPE LENGTH
N
I
SF (I F1
IA NB-Z1
NB-Z2 7,535 82
1C
Jrm 4,770
--
30
1D JW '?
IF CH
Y 139
1G NB-Z1 616
--
1H OW 490
-
-
?THE TOTAL INCLUDES THE 82
FEET OF NRB
TS:
=a mnel, JN--& isdtctknd WaUcnd
NDE
=Neus
a Buffo, Zi=Zmai, Z2=ZonAZ OW-Open Water
1. WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SAC AND
SURVEYED BY WTHERS & RAVENEL, INC.
2 BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOhN ON THIS
SHEET BASED ON BOUNDARY MAP ENTITLED
PROPERTY SURVEY FOR RICHARD BARBEE
TAYLOR A BY WWALIS PEARCH & ASSOC., PA,
DATED 12-31-98 AND FIELD VERIFIED BY NITHERS
& RAVENEL, INC.
3, IMPACT 1G IS TEMPORARY AND ONLY FOR 11iE
INSTALLATION OF THE OUTLET PIPE
4. IMPACT 1H IS TEMPORARY AND ONLY FOR THE
INSTALLATION CF THE OUTLET PIPE
150 ISO
SCALE- I* - 150' '
WITHERS ' RAVENEL Na
IISIMIIRS I ?LASMRRS I SURVIVORS Or ^
21 I MxKaun Drive CxY, Nenh Caorma 27511 L
DWQ Project N
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : W tun! /4 i',4DaLJ
Contact Person: TED GKEDLE Phone Number: ?9/9) ?}toq ?33 D
Level Spreader ID:. FE5 Zo
Level Spreader Length (011 ft. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area I . So ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 0.6 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope 8 % (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)'
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm <. 3 cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader .51 .5 cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation F. l K-r SR.p Os,-,L (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method N 1A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
T ?. Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
77 No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
' Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : LJ /t Elwi MEi4Di cd
Contact Person: Ted 6"- die- Phone Number: (464? W9 - 4.0 -33'fb
Level Spreader ID:. Fes 3o
Level Spreader Length z t z ft. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area 4,7 b ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area z • 4o ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope & % (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)'
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm I& 3 cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader L G • 3 cfs I
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation F, 14r Stiff, Oa (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method /U A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
rG Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
r 6. No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
' Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : lJ K t NN M EA DOW
Contact Person: T AA C4nJ Fe RLD Phone Number: (919) ¢ L p - 3 340
Level Spreader ID: FES 40
Level Spreader Length 8 Z ft.
Drainage Area 4. Zt ac.
Impervious Area ac.
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope S %
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm L.3 cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 6.3 cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation F; ?}cr SH!P 0
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method A) /A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : W R ENN M 46*,OoW
Contact Person: Te_j 6'e-4k Phone Number: ( 719) 4G4 -3.340
Level Spreader ID:. %-CS SU
Level Spreader Length S2. ft. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area t , uo ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 6.50 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope 4 % (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)'
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm -4.0 cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader 4.0 cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation 1="1W S l?r U (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method. N A
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
7 =? • Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
f. G • Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
T, C No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: Michael Horan for Eric
WQ Supervisor: Ken SrhustPr
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Wrenn Meadow Subdivision c/o Anvil Investments
Project Number 05 0170
Recvd From APP
Received Date 1/26/05 Recvd By Region
Project Type Subdivision
County Wake
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
39
5TH O Y O N F- 27-43-15-5 F NSW 30,403. 0.01 139.04
F- F-
NBR Buffcrs F770 N 27-43-15-5 C NSW 30,403. 0.00 F-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Coed 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 354149 Longitude (ddmmss) 784149
Comments:
Please put on-hold. I plan on talking to Sean Clark today during our site visit. Have questions about
I/P call and minimization & avoidance. (Michael Horan for Eric Kulz 2/11/05) 1 talked with Sean
Clark on 2/11/05 and it was determined that I should talk with Kevin Martin. I will give him a call
today and see when I can meet with him. (2/14/05 Michael Horan)
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
AY r
CDEHR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
February 14, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Anvil Investments
100 Weston Estates Way
Cary, NC 27513
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
DWQ Project # 05-0170
Wake County
Subject Property: Wrenn Meadow Subdivision
UT to Camp Branch [03-04-03, 27-43-15-5, C NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Sir or Madam:
On January 26, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated
January 27, 2005 to impact .00628 acres of wetlands and 139 feet of streams to construct the
proposed Wrenn Meadows Subdivision. The DWQ has determined that your application was
incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require
additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or
streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information
requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 211.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your
project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please contact Eric Kulz at the Raleigh Regional Office to set up a site visit.
2. Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and culverts on an
impacts map with a scale of 1" = 50'.
3. Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
4. Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
5. Please provide the worksheets for the level spreaders that are being proposed for your site
plans. These worksheets can be found on our website at:
http://l12o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
One
rthCarolina
No
??tlrr?ll?
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Conta t: Michael Horan for Eric
WQ Supervisor: Ken Schiister
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Wrenn Meadow Subdivision c/o Anvil Investments
Project Number 05 0170
Recvd From APP
Received Date 1/26/05 Recvd By Region
Project Type Subdivision
County Wake
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
39 OTH O Y _o N F__27-43-15-5 F_c NSW 30,403. 0.01 139.00
NBR Buffers O Y O N F_- 27-43-15-5 F-c -F-NSWW 30,403. 0.00 r'
[U Y O N
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Coed 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 354149 Longitude (ddmmss) 784149
Comments:
Please put on-hold. I plan on talking to Sean Clark today during our site visit. Have questions about
I/P call and minimization & avoidance. (Michael Horan for Eric Kulz 2/11/05)
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Dater
Triage Check List
Projett Name.
DWQ#: OF- 6 OD
County: MA0.
To: ? ARO Kevin Barnett
? FRO Ken Averitte
? MRO Alan Johnson
0 RRO Mike Horn

From:

? WaRO Tom Steffens and Kyle Barnes
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Telephone : (919) X33 ?N1
The file attached is being forwarded to dour for your evaluation.
Please call if you need asst}stance.
1
? Stream length impacted
Pf-Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
OBuffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments:

° Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.corn
.: a311OM
1N3NAVd
toTwgwAl
3 AN 2 6 2005
DENR' OSTO?a Q' 0
US army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Mr. Kevin Yates
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd.
Ste. 120
Raleigh, NC 27615 -
January 26, 2005
S&EC Project #7797.W1
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Nationwide Permit 39, 401-Water Quality Certification and Buffer Compliance
and 404 Notification
Wrenn Meadow Subdivision
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Yates and Ms. Karoly:

On behalf of Anvil Investments, Inc., we hereby request authorization from the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) to use Nationwide Pen-nit (NWP) 39 for proposed
permanent impacts to a perennial stream and jurisdictional wetlands resulting from the
construction of a single-family residential subdivision. Written concurrence is requested
from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality that states that the project complies
with the Neuse Buffer Rules and GC3374. A Pre-construction Notification Application
(PCN) is attached, which includes an Agent Authorization Form.
Site Location
The site is located on the south side of Ten-Ten Road (SR 1010) approximately 2,000
feet northwest of the intersection of Ten-Ten Road and SR 1152 and is +/- 42 acres in
size. A stream, including a pond, flows west across the entire property. Please refer to
the attached Figures 1 and 2 for the project's location on a USGS topographic quadrangle
and the Wake County Soil Survey maps, respectively.
Project History
S&EC performed a detailed wetland delineation on May 29, 2003. The U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers issued a notification of jurisdictional determination on December 11, 2003
(Action ID: 200320200).
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Description
The project is a single-family residential subdivision and includes impacts to
jurisdictional wetland, perennial stream channel, and Neuse Buffers resulting from a road
crossing. Proposed impacts are described in the attached PCN and detailed on the
attached Wetland Impact Maps. The proposed impact to perennial channel includes 139
linear feet of fill. Proposed impacts to wetlands include 0.00628 acres (Impacts 1C, 1D,
and 1 E) of fill. In addition, proposed impacts to Zone 1 of the Neuse Buffer total 6,218
square feet, and proposed impacts to Zone 2 of the Neuse Buffer total 4,477 square feet.
Proposed impacts total 139 linear feet of perennial stream channel, 0.00628 acres of
wetland, and 10,695 square feet of riparian buffer.
Impervious surface area on site equals 26% (i.e.; less than 30%). For this reason, an NC
DWQ-approved stormwater plan is not required.
Mitigation
The DWQ will not require mitigation because the impacts to wetlands and streams are
below the mitigation thresholds. Buffer impacts proposed are considered "allowable" and
therefore no buffer mitigation is proposed. Because impacts to wetlands are less than 0.10
acre and the impacts to perennial channel were minimized and below 150', we believe
that the US Army Corps of Engineers should not require mitigation: However if
mitigation is required we propose that payment be made to the NCEEP at a 1:1 ratio.
Sincerely,

Chris Flowers
Wetland Scientist
Kevin Martin
President
Attachments:
1. PCN Form
2. Agent Authorization
3. Figure 1- USGS Map
4. Figure 2 - Soil Survey Map
5. Site Plan
6. Impact Map
7. $200 Application Fee
L2:21 FAX [phone] PRESTON DEVELOPMENT CO.
0002
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P
11010 Ravcn Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phcno: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.cotn
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Name: IJVc t. r wf?r. ?? .
Address. D v ,i rd L
Phone: °11 a ' 361. od
Project Name/Description: ` I
Date: 6- l 9- 0 3
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P-O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
X
Attn: t v c V\, S
Field Office: `a a- cc,- V ?,
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current ro owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc- from this day forward. The W day of
SuAdi , too ?,
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
IMI 6w N1 PDW 454 (-i n
Print Property Owner's Name
Property Owner's Signature
cc: Mr. John Domey
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
cc: Mr, Sean Clark
Soil & Enviroruxrental Consultants, PA
charlotte office: S'nccntbo o Office: ff1Sh= Office:
236 UPhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E l awndale. Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phono (828) 635-$820
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Pax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
.
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ® (only if required)
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Anvil Investments
Mailing Address: 100 Weston Estates Way
Cary. NC 27513-6040
Telephone Number: (919)481-300 Fax Number:_ [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation:_ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridpe Road
Raleip,h, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page I of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Wrenn Meadow
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0760.02-58-4553
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Wrenn Meadow
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):_ The project site is located along
Ten -Ten Road (SR 1010) adjacent to the intersection of Ten-ten Rd and Van Gogh Ln
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035°41'49.22"N, 078°41'49.22"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 41.77 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake):_ Camp Branch
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The property is currently a mixture of forested and early
successional cover. There are also several existing homes Much of the adjacent property has
been developed for residential use.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
overall project is the development of a residential subdivision. The impact involves the
installation of a road over an existing farm road at the dam of a pond. The installation will
require a new overflow pipe to be installed as well as grading and filling.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The construction of the subdivision is to meet
local demand for housing. The purpose of the road crossing is to provide access to the
southern portion of the property.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC performed a detailed wetland delineation on May 29 2003. The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers issued a notification of jurisdictional determination on December 1 l 2003 (Action ID:
200320200).
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permits are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impact involves the
construction of a road over an existing fann road located at the dam of the pond on the
Page 3 of 8
property. The road will require the installation of an overflow pipe for the pond as well as
filling and grading. The result of this construction will produce impacts to perennial stream
channel, jurisdictional wetlands, and Neuse Buffers.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
1C Fill/Grading 0.00068 No Y Emergent
1D Fill/Grading 0.0027 No 0' Emergent
lE Fill/Grading 0.0029 No 0' Emergent
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/dminage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fcma.aov.
**• List a wetland type that best describes wctland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wctland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.5 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.00628 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma linear feet Before Impact leasespecify)
1C Fill 139 UT to Camp Branch 3' Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightcning, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps, arc available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.eov. Several internct sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tol2ozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 139 Linear Feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of
Name Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if
applicable) (lake, pond estuary, sound,
indicate on ma acres bay, ocean, etc.
NA NA NA NA NA
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
Page 4 of 8

If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
A road crossing is necessary to access the southern portion of the property because the
stream, including the pond, extends from the eastern property boundary to the western property
boundary. The applicant has minimized the impacts to streams and buffers by proposing the road
crossing where there is an existing farm road.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
Page 5 of 8
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http:/ih2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The DWQ will not require mitigation because the impacts to wetlands, streams, and
buffers are all below the mitigation thresholds. Because impacts to wetlands are less than
0.10 acre and the impacts to perennial channel were minimized we believe that the US Army
Corps of Engineers should not require mitigation. However if mitigation is required we
propose that payment be made to the NCEEP.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wM/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 139' if required by Corps
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Page 6 of 8
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 4,477 3 NA
2 6,218 1.5 NA
Total 10,695 NA
Gone l extends out 3U tect perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
NA
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
An approved stormwater plan is not required because the proiects proposed impervious surface
percentage is 26% according to the engineer (Withers & Ravenel)
Page 7 of 8
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Project will tie into existing sewer.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applictant/Agent's Signatu're' hate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
6u-

of
N
JC 0
dWo
do
N ??N
?a'w i l
rn
>•JOh
°ana
02?..
001
z°Zo
a
IN.
10
J?
Q
Qo
0 kFn/
Q
1
D?
O
oWr.
ooa
2
W
a ?
W&R 1•.150'
Dote
LML 10/10/2004
y Job Na CARY
JC 203141.1
h
I/ 00
V1 ?
Al 0
@? yJmv
?? ho

n
p cr
41
r
0.Qry
WRENN MEADOW
WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

h
o_
a2lIh
I
OVON
O
O^N
o??o
OVERALL WETLANDS IMPACT PLAN
a
ova
cc
aW^
¢JO
a
J Y7
PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS
ROAD CROSSING
SEE SHEET 2
IMPACT A TM
LDOAl1C4 TYPE
I
A ((LF)
IA NB-Z1 6,218 82
1B NB-Z2 4,471 -
1c JW 30 _-
119
E ?w 130 --
1F CH -- 139*
THE TOTAL INCLUDES THE B2 FEET OF NRB
NOTES
CH=Channel JW-durlsdlctlonal WeUmd
N9=Neuse guNer, Zt=Zone 1, Z2=Zone 2
1. WETLANDS DELINEATED BY S&EC AND
SURVEYED BY WITHERS & RAVENE L, INC.
2 BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS
SHEET BASED ON BOUNDARY MAP ENTITLED
'PROPERTY SURVEY FOR RICHARD BARBEE
TAYLOR A BY WWAMS PEARCN & ASSOC., PA,
DATED 11-31-98 AND FIELD VERIFIED BY WITHERS
& RAVENEL, 11C.
150 0 ISO aro
SCALE; 1' - 150'
WITHERS RAVENEL shoe No.
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 1 of
I I I M.K- Dave Cup, North C..1", 27SI
"4:919.469.3340 -A-- Mc- fw9194L7-M
II 1 1 \ \ ?\,,.
1 '
4,477 SF
NRB Z2 -%
>l A
6,218 SF =---
-NR Z
:`? M:Y.l..... , `?/?? mil'-•
?kY
? i , . _ ? _ - _ _ _ ? \jl??-jam w • \\
??r / /? -? - `?`/// -`, ?/•. .may ?-:r - ?? \" \ \\ \\
- / Y. .?yy! -„f l'r" y.r".?.}'. : '','t. .A ,:..yew - 1.,,?_. _ ? \\ ?\
_, ,/ ,? r I ?/ v, III i 1 "•
, T ,- y ?\ ?I ? \ / '\ \ ICI \ \
F \ \ v \ l , l I . .
' l
\ 11? SF 1 \ 111N
T?AN
\139 LF
1 C I \ ,1 1 \ . \ \ \
SF
w 1 1 IfRik
20 Ima
130 SF
I \
X, X-
WETLA DS\\\
/ \ . 1 1
SCALE: 1'= 40' DATE. 01125105
Note See 0ltiroa Wetlands lm act Map For Areo Lowden 40• ?• 0 oo- 1 of 2
WITHERS & RAVEN EL WRENN MEADOW
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS WETLANDS IMPACT MAP
111 Y-y- Orin Cory, N.1% Garvin 27511 6d 919-40-1.NO f= 919-"7-5m m.?FtlernvRntl.can
GARY WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

cam. '4N. yi

.! 111 • •? • ? ?? / ??.1 ? ? • n \? r?1;? ? ,i? _ ?(?
'

? ? .
• • _ \ 111 ??
? -
- ?r-
? ? {
1
.?

r ? r l; J , ?\
-
?
5
it
;>!
~
?? ? ? `
\?' r •? )fir'" •??
, ? ` • ? ?_ ; -??? ? ? ?\ I?// • /r
,
? eim 7 • ?.

N - 1 •; Lk
;.??

er' NI C' 1 ?1 L

Project No.
Figure 1- USGS Ma
P
7797.Wtl
® Soil & Envi
o
t
l C
lt
t
PA
Powell Property r
nmen
a
onsu
an
s,
Project Mgr.:
Sc Anvil Investments 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Wake Count
County
NC
, Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Scale:
V = 2,000'
01125/05
Apex Quadrangle
Dated 1993
? 24 i ] G SC7 4l 1 i?, y yrt?'jt° ttt-.: ? ? y '` s' .x s!t ? ?dE ? ? t „ ? I .
`? ?`'? ? CeQ2 ? 'F q,Ft: rtllSahrf?;jtt4+r? is t ? 1,? y ? s .I
+'i f?'1 R i L? ? .q ?%. {7??2Y>j?.?s?•f z?:L? ? ,.. 0r 1 ?!`? f L'( Q,G ??` ? g(`z ) W.
AXf`'r'i,
+.? ? o e w _a `1 i.' Y +4. ??t,11. ?o? y, F,q ?t it h hy? b 7 ? ` A , 11
ypt32 . h b ti : ;Rt J,i v AI
ASC2 ?? 1 ?C2 ? ? K t ? t? ?t?U ? ''.s?? ?r , ? '- yt Q At?e :dr s rfi t o
G r ?.' 4S` ". 1 •;? i a ?4.t{ ? _ ?tY E ; 1 ? t.
4x s 2 '?? '? ? /r,
? p?1? Jal .'.c.,r ? t ljr K_
40
rt r
its
??^y`?yr- ? - ? AhD t ? ? ?. - e '?•v S9! r??.'_?t ? F s? Y '? ???? } ? ,? " ?,;t t <r :.
pp n .. r L r'Eh g62 YF . , k S /..F?a? }? +' ~ :` idj€ r ?.'4+ _40V
''?s
? Iti, ? qQ4 r "f;a F- _? y ? _.i ('t}n J?J F s '? Fr."? t ?yA', +r5 •.
1 lKdi?2 ! '' .,p iV= J`"£` ?Y ti?Ziz kY .
ACES
t AgQ2 + p ?e ?, A 8 3 l T rr ?`?:1
r y.
x 7` ? Sf "
? ? L'OC ?.?4 t eAn1.2;•.ti? ?` r _ /??;- ? ?.- °y$ s-??-` t????' ? ? ?k' `??? ?' r? F'r ,w?`$-t z
4. ? YVtt 1 i rtl•# ye - ? r. r ? ' ? 2 r.? a.. .,?'' / ?'t a e 1 ? ?..? ,? t
H "?`:?_ `1/?J?/y?^+-1 t ; ?????4 y?> T ?,. ?l;d. ?C,(i?ti •?, ,?" ? '? ???y "° ' ` ,I
APE3 [ Y 3 j, fi A942 ?` CBQ2 aim
tt r jt. ? d s tlt °r. /' s 11r? s WEE S r,( ?F +
?AgC2 ?};l ' ' fvCF C962
} 'I-'A'•t.7 s' .?' ` •i? ?A??? `i?"'r. •a f ?? _? :? r.,?f,.,, !''fY: - 'ApC\?`K,
2
41Et5
• {.APC S lr f c. i QQ?
} 1 ti t f:Cl j y r j a?f, c
?tY CIC3 t AgQ2 t, _ f -- itt f r C`-R , r
c ,
?? t? BPD ? ?4C, ' s' w ?PD .tt ,QC' + .wY ?y? / 44? .` _ { r^ t, d 3 f4'CV
`t r:t t yC Q2 ? t ? ?/? ??1r?1•?.rl. h t A 82
wt i,
5. ?- , G 1 C?2 L 4
nuu 4 c+c
,e ? ? - r ? anti d i_
??' 1 r AgC '{} ?' ?r?? 1 C?Ql `? fr ti t' a
Ctn ?82 ri G?' :4 LCm a t f'r r~' ? ' ?, ASC7 ? "
a f f ~ A
1,?z? Ascz

Project #:
MT.WJ 1 Scale:
1":1320' Figure 2 - Soil Survey
M

Project
Date: ap
Mgr.: KM 1126105
Powell Property
Anvil Investments
Wake County, NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
a.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
NC Division of water Quality
Type Date Reference
Tzan N Invoice
5748 012705 invoice 01/27/05 7797-VJ1
Date: 01/27/05
Balance
$200.00

Check Number:
Check Amt:
Discount
$0.00
017340
rrnT-
$200.00
Pay Amount
$200.00
ma_ _ - _ _ - - - -
ti,.,,., I ~ ~
I ~ I v ~ / / ~ \ ~
I it i ~ ` I ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ NOW OR FORMERLY ~ / / / \ /
I , JOHN A POWELL ~ ~ ~ / _ _ I ul I• I ~ \ / I I ~ / ACR GE 41,95 AC
I it I PIN //0761.03-40-7899 i ~ ~ ` .II II ~ s , ~ I ~ I I DB 9143 PG 1283 ~ • I o ` ' ~ / I C ON OPEN SPACE 7.89 AC,
i l l I S i I ~ ~ I I ~ / DED TED THOROUGHFARE R/W ACREAGE 0,438 AC.
I ~i II I I a ,~,t~,~fF \ . ~ , / I ~ I m W `ir' TSC , mot, I / / I I I I I _ N ~ I I I , Ac. EXIS ING THOROUGHFARE R/W ACREAGE 0, 34
~ ~ F 00 5 STRIP OFF RED TO ~ TO I ~ ~ \ ZONNG Rt2-CU
~,C~/ ~ I w I .4, f 8E DEDICATED A,~ PUBLIC R/W :I I~ ~ 2000 G 1082 1 3LIC R W I 73 PRO~OSED NUMBER OF LOTS 2 I
~ II I r7 ','m' \ ` ~ I MAXI UM NUMBER OF LOTS 91 1
- = 1 ~ i ~ - ref I I , PRO SED DENSITY (DU/NET ACRE) 1,74 DU/AC I I
I ~o ~ ~ 'V I I I ~ I ~ I, „ . ~ ~ , 1 1/2 OF 78 B?B ~ MAXy,UM DENSITI' (DU/NET ACRE) 2,2 DU/AC
I ~ ~ z ' I; ~ , ++e , WITH 100 R ~ I ~ F WITH 100 R W \ MINI UM LOT SIZE ALLOWED 12,000 SF / i \ I
I~ I I I ~ I ez s. ~ e ~ i ; . a W_ ~ ~ I. y \ I MINI UM LOT SIZE PROPOSED 12,106 SF
I \ I I I 1 ~ l~ - - - \ \ AVE GE LOT SIZE 16,427 SF ~ ~ \ I ,
I ' ~ ` ~ 0 f ~ , 7 ~ ~ ~y' O V ~ MI UM LOT WIDTHS 80 1 \
~1 24,667 SF , 1 , .z ~ ~ ~ ' 1 \ LF OF STREETS 4,854 LF . ~ s , ~ 'f A Q \ LF OF THROUGHFARE WIDENING 1,181 LF
~ v ~o 5 ~ ~ \ ~ - ~ ~ \ ~ l a ~ i ~ - - - - - - - OF WATERLINE 5,025 LF - lid D \ - -
I H- I' ` ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ \ ~ I ~ \ .14;923. SF . i `~.f ~ F SEWER LINES 4,895 LF I ~ LF O 'Q/
Z I ~ ~ ~,.i ~ N M N M T ~ ~ P T 20 44o GPo . \ C~ ENTRA CE ~ U E AVERAGE SEWER FLOW (280 G D/LO)
I ~ I ~ ~ \ I W r e' - ~ - / ~4.1 AND LANDSCAPE I / 10,00 AC, , ~ DENUDED AREA (ACRES)
\~'a ~ ~ 4 \ \ ~ I I~ ~ ` s , ~ ~ ` ~ ~ - ~ EASEMENT _ a71352 sF 60, \ , a- P ~ ` ~ ~ IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA INFRASTRUCTURE (SF)
V ~ a I' ,911 SF , A PORTION OF ~ I~ , ; , j~ eG ~'F I ~ s s 6 ~F ~ A, ~ 1SETBACKS
\ i ~ F \ GRENADIER o ~ I; • w iC Cq,~ f rS ~ ~ f . ' ~ 20' W , Cq ~ ~ S ~ " ~ FRONT YARD
I MB 2001 PG 760 a ~ ~ R S , ' M \ < Q '`C-430~- ~ ~ ~ ~r COS AF \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SIDE YARD -MIN, 10' a - ~ M ~ ' _ n ~ ~ REAR YARD 25
\ \ I
I 0 9 r-~ ~ °18, SF ~ \ Q ~J ~ ~ ' ~ ~
, i, - ~ _ ~ i ~ ~ 1 - WAKE COUNTY PIN NUMBER 0760,02-58-4553
I ~ ~ - 1 ~ \ ~ ~ ; : ; vi
\ .13,849 SF 1 , _ ~ _ i ~ i ` 60'
s _ ~„v I ` S ~UF h - ~ vy !J`~ \
q N ';591. -3`1,5 ~ 19;643. 19;643 tA 1?~ /Ch F ~ o .i Y.. / VSO ~Po~\. '
a, 8, 2 SF 11 1 ` ~ A ~ , a~ , ~`R,~ - , ~ ~ j y~ ~ - DE~OPER/OWNER;
I - - SIpM _ ' 27' D V.. ~ R ~ ` 1 ~ ; ~ 14, 221- SF + _ t,, ~ ; , ~ ~ ~ f5~ A - ~ \ 2~ ~ B, ~ ~ ~ E ,°0 r ~ ~ 1010 INVESTORS, LLC 73
~~~SQ ~R / ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 100 WESTON ESTATES WAY i , < \ I wH ss~ ~ ~ ~ 18,168- SF ~ ; - ~ ' ~ CARP, N.C. 27513
20~ < ~"~7;755 S~~_~, ~ ~ / ` I I p ~ \ i 72 i ~;;C'~~;.~; ~ ~ " TELEPHONE: [phone] i , \ I
~ i, ; `~;r ~ ro ~ F ~ 919-677-8600 f~~ ~ _ / ~ ~ ~ AX, . s ' ~ 15,958 S~ ~,r ; n ATTN: RANGY SMITH
/ 1 X60 0 `R W - -rf1' , I I A" aso- -i ~ , , .
ry. ~ ENTRA CE MONUMENTS `n t~ " ~ CB ' - ' , 1, , , ~ ~ ~ TOWN Of CARP - , ~-.L r' ifs/-;` ~ ~ PROJECT ~ 04-SB-024
I / f~ 'q, ~ ~ r y. ,1.. 1, i i , i 'rv ~ 435+-- ~ _ , ~ , it6,1394~SF i ~ ~ ~ ~
/ ~ , ~ C i 1'-~ 44 -r'~ ~ '~1 W i ~ \ \ ' r. , \ ~ , ~ ~n~, ~ , s ~>A
A PORTION OF ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ _ ' n I a I ` " \ " 4?F08 sT? ~ ~l; 65 ;V I \ 14,985"SF ~ GRENADIER oo W ~ r i 5 ''~F ~ \ ~ _ s, - -i A
\I~ .,75,9 SF _ ~ F ~ ~ i . MB 2001 PG 1575 ~ + , 62 ~ ~4 , - - 14;4A3 SF;, I~ , i- 4~~ SF , ~ ~ . Mn ~3s: fir"'' ~ ~ ~ y`>>
~ 4007SF V as- E-.;.- - ~ ~ W I r._.~'_ a _ - - `lw A FES 30 J i ~ _ - r ~ V" ~ y. -
I ur-~R '~,wu.. , , MM, 611. ' ~ss , , , . . _ REZONING CONDITIONS
~ r~;=~- - -i - ~ , I r t O4 ~SFy i t 2
I N b I, is B / . , I v ~ X18 006 5 .z i ( ~ ' ~ -~'~f;~'~ ~ 1) SITE DENSI WILL N01 EXCEED 2.2 DU/AC. 61 _ ,
O [ . J i ~42~' ~ ~ ~ , i - - - / I I _ ~ 2) NO MASS GRADING WILL TAKE PLACE IN AREAS WHERE THERE ARE EXISTING TREES, , 3 F u! g
I ~ I - - / ~ _ ~ ~ ~a C ~ ' ~~"Y' IGNED TO PROVIDE ACCESS FOR LOCAL , ' ~ ~ ~ 68 I ~ - ~ 3) THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION SYSTEM WILL BE DES
I / WIr" ~ ~ iI` ) d~ ~ ~ r -,,I 14;3Q1 ~F,,~.-~- TRAFFIC BUT, AT THE SAME T1ME, WILL BE DESIGNED TO DISCOURAGE CUT THROUGH TRAFFC,
~ r / r \ 1 `6 a ~ - 4) ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC WILL BE DIRECTED TO USE THE TEN TEN ROAD ENTRANCE ~'to ~ _ - ~ _ - FOR CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WITHIN THE SITE,
I N r~ ! - - _ - _ E13YEN7~ _ _ .
L.__J _ \
II / 1 _ ~ lip--~------- --------,z ~ _ ayj',
/ I ~ ~W II iJ I COMMON OPEN ~,I .
- ~ I- I SPACE -
~ 1 F , I'. 8, 26 5 GENERAL NOTES \ ` 50 RIPAI I' r ~ 50' RIPARIAN ,
I - - I BUFFE I' BUFFER - GENERAL NOTES , ~ ,
i. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWN OF 22. ALL STORMWATER MANAGEME BASINS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM - ~ ~ ~ X20- / = - I , 1' n A. SIGNAGE IS A SEPARATE APPROVAL PROCESS AND HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED
CARY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS AS REVISED JULY 1, 2004. OFF5ITE VEMS, REFER TO OSCAPE PLAN ON SHEET 14 FOR / ! ~ . ~ ' - e ~ ~ EXISTING POND AOOrt10~M1 Mi0RIM110N. y 1 ~ ~L I~,' ~ ~ ~ ri AS A PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. IF YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A UNIFORM SIGN 7 r_~-'' m PLAN, YOU MUST SUBMIT AND OBTAIN APPROVAL pF A UNIFORM SIGN PLAN PRIOR TO THE
_ _ ~ 'i ~`I TO REMNN - 2. ALL PROPOSED STREET RICHT OF WAYS SHALL 8E 50' AND STREET WgTHS ` _ ~ . RELEASE OF PLATS FOR THE RECORDING OF LOTS (IF APPLICABLE). PLATS TO RECORD LOTS ~ % ` ~ CANNOT BE APPROVED UNT1L THE UNIFORM SIGN PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED.
SHALL BE 27' BACK TO BACK UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ~ ~ SHALL ~ Y WRH GROUNA STATE X ; ! 18,6 SF<• ~ BUN.OMG AND HANDICAPPED C VOIUME 1C. ~ ~ , I sar ~ , / ' EJpD1~ I~ ~r 3 N A ATELY AS REQUIRED LE. BUFFER ' / t B. WHERE EXISTMG VEGETATION FAILS TO FUNCTIO OEOU ,
. 3. SETBACKS ARE SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE 1MTH THE CARY L.0.0, 24. ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS SHALL B MAIiTAINED 8Y IN ~ ~ - ~ ~ ' 57 / _ y ~ TYPE A, B, C, AND 100' THOROUGHFARE CORRIDOR BUFFER) THE GARY SIZE INSPECTOR r: i N RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS IN ADDITION TO THOSE
CHECK THE CARY ORDINANCES FOR PORCHES, DECKS, GARAGES, ETC. ~ ~ ' PERPETUITY, ~ / i~-, i ~ N SHOWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN BASED ON ACTUAL FlELD CONDITIONS. ~ 17,215 SE / ~ ~
i ~ / 4. UTILITY AND PIPELINE EASEMENTS SHALL BE RECORDED AFTER 25. A DEVELOPER AGREEMENT SHALL BE D FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS ~ % ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 19 , ' ~ ~ C. ALL TREE PROTEC110N FENCING SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL SITE WORK IS COMPLETED,
CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AS PART OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAT, TO SR 1010. THIS REOIIEST SHALL SUBMITTED PRIOR TO BIDDING s ~ ~ ~ THIS WORK, / ~ Y , 1 F ~ ' .f ~ , - ~ i ~ - ~ ~jt~' ~ ; q ° THE FENCING SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE FlNAL SITE INSPECTION FOR THE CERTIFlCATE ` ~ ~L l ~ ' G~~ ~ NOW OR FORMERLY OF OCCUPANCY (CO).
5. BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS BASED ON SURVEY BY WITHERS ~ RAVENEL. 2 ,626 S / \ - r ; I,,~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ CARP ALLIANCE CHURCH N- / 1'' 58 _-'j" ~ i 0, ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITY EWIPMENT AND FACILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH 0 SITE
26. LANDSCAPE AREAS WIT111N MEDIANS BE IrWNTAINEO BY HOA IN PERPETUITY. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ; ~ ' / ' S9 ' _ PIN #0760.02-68-4403 ELECTRIC, CABLE, TELEPHONE, GAS OR OTHER SIMILAR UTILITY SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE S9 "1+,-18,043S~F~~,- ' S5 ~ 'R MB 2001 PG 608 SIDE OF REAR YARD AREA OF THE SITE AND SCREENED, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, MATH
6. DESIGN BASED ON TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY WITHERS do RAVENEL. 27, CONNECTION TO WINDING OAK WAY, TO SOUTH, SHALL NOT BE MADE ~ i , , ~ ) ,i EVERGREEN PLANTINGS, PLANTINGS SHALL ALLOW FOR A MINIMUM OF A 5 CLEARANCE
UNTIL 50% OF THE COS FOR THIS PROJE HAVE BEEN ISSUED, ,I ~ 1 ~ 13,797 SF ~ ' A 1 1 13,797" SF' : , • 6,296 SSE. , - DB 8871 PG 04 AROUND THE STRUCTURE TO ALLOW FOR ACCESS. ADDITIONALLY, ANY SIDE OF THE ,y-=----=._ .1 ~ ` ; I STRUCTURE HAVING A DOOR OR LOCK, THE PLANTINGS SHALL ALLOW FORA 10 CLEARANCE,
28. SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENTS SHAD. BE REC DED ON PLAT AND KEPT - - - - 1 ' 1 \ ~ ; w 60 7. FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN IS NOT LOCATED THIN THESE PARCELS PER _ ~ r, ~ YL_. ~ ~ FREE OF OBSTRUCTIONS. THESE AREAS S 0 BE CLEARED ANO ~ ~ ~ THE AMOUNT OF CLEARANCE SHALL ACCOUNT FOR THE SIZE OF THE PLANT MATERIAL AT ~f - ~ MATURITY.
FIRM MAP 37183C0515E DATED MARCH 3, 1992, P r . ~ ~ r ' 0~ R W . " ~ ~ ' GRADED AS NECESSARY TO ROVIDE THE RE IR SIGHT DISTANCE, 30 GREENWAY s 5 / , 12,861 SF ao ' RI HT-OF-WAY OR WITHIN 5' OF A ' E. NO TREE SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN A ROADWAY G
L,. _C0~?M~N bPEN'' (A~- Eau l ~ ~b.,, , ~ 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES PRIOR A M NT J< SPA 0 ~ s;+o ' 61 2 E SEE cE ~ ~ , / , 2 ~ SIDEWALK.
TO CONSTRUCTION, LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANS i I 14 F~ IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION BUT CAN BE CONSIDERED ~ ( ` ,0555, ~ ~ ; 54 ;
ONLY AS APPROXIMATE, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' FA9DRMT. ~ i ~ a• nl 0~ ~ , ~
i y, 9, ALL HANDICAP RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH - ~ ~t6;572 ~ s ' ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ TREE SURVEY INFO
TOWN OF CARY STD. 3.16 (REVISED 4/15/04), NOW OR FORM R Y N ~ ' ~ ~ ~ - ~ ` ,40
WIL TAM N ~ ~ ~ " ~ , ~ ~ ls, 10. ALL CUL-DE-SACS SHALL HAVE A 45' RADIUS FROM CENTER OF SAC L JO ES , / / r " 16,6 '~F . ? r. ~ ~ L TREE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN ON SHEETS 2 d< 3, , ~ ~ ;
PIN - ~ ~ s. ~ ~ , , ~ / TO BACK OF CURB. #0760,01 48-3103 / s._ 14,069 ~~E!;- j~ ~ ' i ~i ` ' - ~ ( 2. FORESTED AREAS ALONG EASTERN AND WESTERN BOUNDARY
DB 2905 PG 31 I ~ ~ . / _ ~ , / -~r / ~ ' 11. ALL STREET INTERSECTIONS BACK OF CURB RADII ARE 30 UNLESS NOTED o~ J~ , / ^ `ryg ~ e 7z, ' ` ~ LINE ARE COMPRISED OF LARGE PINES WITH SPORADIC HARDWOODS ~ I ~ @ ; w 1.1 SP -1 ~ , „ ANO UNDERSTORY VEGETATION. FORESTED AREA ALONG CREEK
~ 21,180 SF ~ J 1 Y'• OTHERWISE. N 39 9 ~ ~ ~ ANO OPEN SPACE IS A MIXTURE OF HARDWOODS, PINES AND " M~~st ; ~ --r~-~ NOERSTORY,
38 ~ 12, AN ENTRY FEATURE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL p ~ s" `,r~1&,869 S~ , ' 41 ~ a„ U i9 S~ ) ~ - '
TPA ~ n PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF ANY LOTS WITHIN THAT DEVELOPMEN H SE q' ~ ~ \ , , 1;,- "12,i 8 SF' ~ ~ , IF THE DEVELOPER DECIDES TO INSTALL THESE FEATURES. I°' r ~ o i ~ __~__,__a_~ 4 ~ 1,281 SE' ~ ~ , ~ ~
I ' ~ ~ - I l 23 T ~ '27 B ~ ,
13, STORMWATER DETENTION DEVICES VISIBLE FROM THE REAR YARD OF ANY ~ ~ 12,106 SF ' ~ ADJOINING DWELLING SHALL BE SCREENED FROM OFF-SITE VIEWS ~ ~ ~ ~ 'r ~ °~s % ; MINIMUM LOT LANDSCAPE
~ 15,259. S , : j 6 ~ 14, ALL INTERSECTION SIGHT TRIANGLES ARE LOCATED WITHIN STREET R/WS ; ; b` 1 ~ ~ ri ' T' ~ SLOT 44 SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE
4 74 SF ~ , ~ ~ ; OR SHOWN OTHERWISE. ~ a` • -'~o y ~'r;, i ~ gip'-""``J ' CUL-DE-SAC DUE TO THE SIGHT t, EXISTING VEGETATK)N HALL BE RETAINED WHENEVER , .1 ' , ~ ~ 42 - - --~_._a_. DISTANCE EASEMENT. POSSIBLE.
, 15, ALL SPECIALTY STREET SIGNS AND POST SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE , ~ 8 ~ i c'~ 31 i , ,1 ' 15,493' SF, 'r ' : ~ ' 2, AFTER DWELLING CONSTRUCTION, EACH LOT SHALL
IAH t ' ` "~~i~L a , = r ; ~ 0 TOWN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF CARY 1 n ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ 24 ~ I 13,142 SF ~ 1 POUCY STATEMENT N0,85 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ! ~ ~ !~I',°: ~q,, 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I HAVE AS MMIMUM THE FOLLOWING PLANT TYPES AND t ~ ~ , 1 i
17, 658~SF ' 1J,44~F ~ ~ ~ , , , 5 SF " ~ ~I NUMBERS: ' ` i , F ~ ~ ~ FOUNDATION PLANTINGS i ~ 14,114~,SF, -
16. COMMON OPEN SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, ~ !x,35 ~ 32 FUTURE SEWER ` ~ - _ _ ~ ~ , ~ ( ' ,~1i ~o ~ ! ~ FOUR LARGE SHRUBS MANRE HEIGHT BETVIEEN 6' dt 10') ~ _ 1 ~ (
~ 1 1026 SF i ~ 12 403 5F ~ ~ ~ ~ 17. WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS. BY TOWN OF _ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ; , , , ttt • EIGHT SHALL SHRUBS (MATURE HEIGHT BETWEEN i' g 6')
CARY. ' r-~ ce to ge_ - _ ` ~ ~ 18, DELINEATED WETLAND AREAS SHALL NOT BE CLEARED DRAINED OR ` 1~ 75X Of THE SHRUBS MUST BE IN THE FRONT YARD ~i , ~ - 1 ,i~6'SF' i _ - - - - - - - - 25% OF THE SHRUBS MUST BE IN 1HE REAR YARD
OTHERWISE DISTURBED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY THE I i / 2 ~ a ~ ~ _ _ _ uH 3)-- , , ~ \ ~ C 50 , ONE IhRCE TREE IN FRONT YARD AND ONE LARGER TREE
U,S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND NCDENR, ~ 1 ~ ~ 2T B I I~ ; 16,07 SF 51 ~ I _ ~ ~ ~c ~ ~ i i IN REM YARD (MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 2b' TALL AT MATURITY)
19, THE DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBIF FOR ALL INSTALLATION COST ~ ~ ~ 44 44 \ , $ ~ ~ , - / ~ ONE SMALL TREE IN FRONT YMD AND ONE SMALL TREE ' ~ _ _ - I I IN REM YARD (MUST RANGE BETWEEN 10' dt 25' TALL AT MATURITf)
ASSOCIATED WITFI STREET UGHTING ALONG ALL PROPOSED STREETS, ~ ' ' r1 ~ 33 ~ \ ` ~~1'3,16 ~ ,:_._..19,446 SF L , , ADJACENT STREETS AND THOROUGHFARES AS REQUIRED PER TOWN OF 'i a i ~ s 446 SF L - - - _ s _ /
CARY POUCY STATEMENT N0, 13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL ALSO I ~ ~ 15,138 SF ~ : - Y ~ 3, EXISTING VEGETATION THAT REMAINS ON THE LOT ' so , I ~ / SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COUNT OF MINIMUM LOT
CONTACT CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY IN ORDER TO i ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ Nr _ i i ^ S0A1 ~a' DEVELOP A STREET LIGHTING PLAN FOR THE SITE/SUBDIVISION PLAN I ,.~1 1~ ' - - ro' LANDSCAPING, , ~
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. I ~ ; ~ - ~I I,~ Y8 0 ' 49 ' / 4, NO LESS THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE MINIMIAd ~ s \ ~ A PORTION OF LANDSCAPING SHAD BE VISIBLE FROM THE FRONT
I~ I - 20, INSTAUATION OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS MUST OCCUR PRIOR TO I ~ `,14,426 SF , y. I _!14 817 5F ) - AR R ~ THE LOt, ti ~ 1 LES BES / J t ;I 3 MB 1984 PG 1245 •~••~NO•~•~q
RECORDING OF LOTS OR A BOND MUST BE POSTED, I ` 1, ~ ,,mac I \ 1; ~ ~y w ~a I;, / 5, ALL PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRKNt TO ISSUANCE ~qR 4i ±s ~ . r: i ~ i i . ~ ~ OF A CO FOR EACH LOT. ~ ~ Nip ~
21, FENCING PROPOSED ALONG A THOROUGHFARE OR COLLECTOR STREET I I ' i ~ r\ , • • / . ? E Ip 9 .
L F NIF RM DIMENSIONS MATERIALS ANO COLORS. IF ~ ~ i 'i. ~ SHAL BE 0 U 0 I ~ ~ , ~ ~ i - , A FENCE PROPOSAL IS NOT PART OF THE APPROVED SITE DEVELOPMENT I I~ ~ ' ~ ~ i 2 , 0 R , I ° ~'F , i,' 'ti - - j~0 ~9~i s ; 1 _ o jQ
I~ C~~• , , ~ ~ . ~ 4 PLAN, THEN INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS WILL NOT 8E ALLOWED TO ~ ~ ~ ~ i, 8 f ! INSTALL A FENCE UNLESS ALL LOT OWNERS ALONG A THOROUGHFARE OR ~ I I~ 16,8 4~, F ,'~l 28 ;RI ~ 29 ! Q ;45 ~ 17 4 ~ / . i i i ire a,.,i r.- ~ Vl 1 ~ SEAL j i
COLLECTOR STREET AGREE TO INSTALL ONE CONTINUOUS FENCE ALONG Ig ~ ~ -~.I ~ ~ ; ,20 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ i i _ 46 i ~ ~ ~ i i ; 17,20 s~ - I / 16269 1
ALL PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO THE STREET, IF A FENCE IS PROPOSED, I 13,276- SF ~ ~ 14,137 5F 11 ~ 2-888~SF ~ ! THEN EVERGREEN SHRU65 ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE FENCE AT A MH , I I I ~ ~ ~ ' I ' ' 'F 15293'SF ~I ~ ~ ~ S ~~t / ~ ; APPROVED , 9 ~~?GI • •
5' SPACING WILL BE REQUIRED, STREET TREES, IF NOT INSTALLED AS A ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _y, ~ ~ _ uH to ~ ~ TYP MUST ALSO BE INSTALLED AT ~ , . F J I 4 ~ • • S F • ' - - - ~ TOWN OF GARY •ti E. cP
PART OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED PLAN, _ _ , _ ~ ` _ J , L NO MORE THAN 40' SPACING BETWEEN TRUNKS, IN ANY EVENT, ALL ~ - •L p ~ - - ••~•n„n••N••
\ N89'i FENCING ALONG A THOROUGHFARE OR COLLECTOR STREET MUST FIRST ,SST ~H \ 259 W 813.87,,, it I I rn NTRANCE MONO E BE APP D PRI R TO INSTALLATION OF THE FENCE. \ \ ~ ,I B I I d ROVE 0 ~ ~ ~ I ( , I,; , NCE MONU E'K~TS N as• ~'3 " - A roved b Date ~,I o a w 21x.22 PP Y
\ ~ pl,,,,,,;,,,, n„~, 100 0 too 200
i'1 { 531 /
Engineering Date / SCALE; 1 = 100
No. Revision Date B Designer Scale Sheet No.
A TOC 1st REVIEW COMMENTS 11/22/04 GAS W&R 1"=100'
B TOC 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 1 03 05 GAS Drawn By Date
C TOC 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 1 24 05 GAS GAS 10/4/04 WRENN MEADOW Checked By Job No. SITE PLAN WITHERS R"ENEL ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
JEC 203141.1 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com

~ v A ~ it ~ I ~ ~
G .l I ~
; ~ ~ I I / Y UTILITY NOTES
~ ~ , ~ / GRAVEL & RIP RAP FILTER BASIN DESIGN )ESIGN STORM DRAINAGE SUMMAR ownstream Rim (1) ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN CF CARY
` ~ `4,^ ~ ~ I ~ BASIN DENUDED DRAINAGE BASIN DIMENSIONS WEIR VOLUME CLEANOUT ~ ~ ~ ~ # AREA AREA DEPTH LENGTH WIDTH LENGTH PROVIDED FRED I E CLEANOUT VOLUME SURFACE SURFACE r m In rNert Elevotio6levation Sloe STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS REVISED APRIL 15, 2004. .D FREQ REQUIRED AREA REQPROVIDED UpstreamDownstreorhen th Q Pre Q 10 Posi Upst ea vd p
~ ~ I ~ (AC) (AC) (FT) (FT) (Fi) (FT) (CF) (MONTHS) Node Node (fi~ (cfs) (cfs} Size Elevation (ft) (it) (ft) (fi/ft) R T AVOID DISTURBING (MONTHS) (CF) (SF) (SF) (2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CAE O
~v . ~ ~ I A 1,70 4,00 4 50 25 1D 3 750 12 ` \ / B 1.10 1.30 5 32 16 5 2 048 12 12 3060 1170 1 250 CB 51 FES 5D 127 2.4 4,0 15 inch 427.70 423.00 434.40 0.0370 EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL DURING SEWER LINE CONSTRUCTION, ALL 3 12 t 980 380 512 SANITARY SEWER PIPE STREAM CROSSINGS AND DISTURBANCES SHALL BE
` ~ 20 0.80 1,50 4.5 30 15 5 1 575 12 v ~ ~ i 12 1440 439 450 CB 21 FES 20 106 3.2 5.3 15 inch 432.60 424.5D 438.00 0.0764 PROTECTED WITH 22" CLASS 1 RIP-RAP WITH FABRIC UNDERUNER, 1 12 4 320 1 375 1 458
~ ~ y \ 30 2.40 4,70 4 54 21 12 4374 12 ~ ~ 40 1.60 1.80 5 36 19 6 2888 12 3 12 2,880 527 722 CB 36 CB 35 40 3.4 5.6 15 inch 435.06 434.25 439.31 0.0203 (3) ALL MANHOLES LOCATED OUTSIDE OF PAVED AREAS SHALL
~ -1 \ I ~ 50 0.80 1,60 4.5 31 15.5 6 1 682 12 ~ I ~i ~ 80 0.30 0.30 4.5 18 9 4 567 12 ! 12 1,440 468 461 HAVE A RIM 0.EVATION ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 12 540 88 162 CB 35 CB 31 141 5.2 8,6 15 inch 434.00 428,00 439.02 0.0426
\ ~ ' ' ~ ~ \ 92 0.20 1.50 4.5 30 15 5 1 575 12 ~ ~ \ i 12 360 439 450 Cg 33 CB 32 27 0.9 1.5 15 inch 425.00 424,80 428.74 0.0074
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ \ ~,'t BMP ®FES 6D 3.D0 iD.90 N A N A N A N A 13 5D0 12 0 12 5a0o 3188 a50D CB 32 CB 31 90 3,3 5,5 18 inch 424,60 424.25 428.74 O.D039 (4) WATER UNE SHALL BE 2' MINIMUM OFF EDGE OF CURB UNLESS SHOWN Cg 34 CB 32 38 1.4 2.4 15 inch 425.10 424.80 429.59 0,0079 OTHERWISE. CB 31 FES 30 170 9.8 16.3 24 inch 423.75 422.75 433.09 0.0059
~i i r \ ~ \ , ~ , \ Q~ . ~ NOTES: 1' OF FREEBOARD IS PROVIDED FOR EACH BASIN,
~ \ ~ / \ SB p92 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS TOC STD. DETAIL0400D.05 CATCH BASIN RISER/FILTE r i \ ~ 11 411,18 415.11 0.0074 (5) WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID AT LEAST 10 FEET LATERALLY MEASURED BASIN RISER/FILTER CB 43 CB 42 27 2,5 4.2 15 inch 4 .38 EDGE TO EDGE FROM EXISTING OR PROPOSED SANITARY OR STORM CB 42 CB 41 156 3.4 5.6 15 inch 410.98 409.00 415.11 0.0127 SEWER UNLESS THE 0.EVATIONS OF THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN
~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ SURFACE AREA IS BASED ON 1,500 SF/CFS FOR 10 YR-6 HR STORM rr i i / i' ~ \ CB 41 FES 40 62 3.8 6.3 15 inch 408.80 407.00 417.36 0.0243 IS AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER WITH A
/ \ ~ CB 73 CB 72 195 2.3 3.8 15 inch 427.98 424.11 431.71 0.0198 HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF AT LEAST 3 FEET.
i r / \ ~ w \ r/ r / ~ v / ~ ~RROPOSED ROAD r~ \ \ ~ CB 72 CB 71 119 4.2 7.0 15 inch 423,81 421.70 427.86 0.0177 CB 71 CB 70 163 5.7 9.4 18 inch 421.42 417.80 425.46 0.0222 WHERE A WATER MAIN AND A SANITARY SEWER CROSS, AND THE
WID ~JING PER ~ ~ ~ A~~. f, o CB 70 CB 69 99 6.7 11.2 18 inch 417.60 416.00 421.88 0.0162 VERTICAL SEPARATION IS LESS THAN 18 INCHES OR THE WATER UNE
r ~ ~ \ \ o \ ~ ISSIPATOR DESIGN ~ ~ POWELZ TRACT 0 , \ \ CB 69 CB 68 27 8.4 14.0 24 inch 415.5D 414.80 420.79 D.D259 PASSES UNDER THE SANITARY SEWER, THE SEWER MAIN SHALL BE ATOR DESIGN CB 68 CB 62 75 11,4 19.0 24 inch 414,60 413.50 420.79 0,0147 OUCIILE IRON PIPE,
~ ~ r ~ : ~ . \ / APR N T D, STREAM CB 65 C8 64 27 0,6 1.0 15 inch 423.36 423.16 427.09 0,0074 TLET D, STREAM RIP RAP RIP RAP SIZE CB 64 CB 63 290 6,1 10.2 18 Inch 422.50 418.43 426.98 D.D140 ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE.
WINbJAM ~ A'~ - ~ ounET #PIPE Dla. v10 0 ouTlE ~ . A LENGTH WIDTH WIDTH 1 it P ~ ~ ~ ~ INCHES FT SEC FEET FEET FEET DTH WIDTH THICKNESS CLASS d5D CB 67 CB 66 109 2.2 3,6 15 inch 433.86 426.98 437.61 0.0631
" i t I~ ~ A~`.: \ v v EET) (FEET) (INCHES) (INCHES) CB 66 CB 64 96 3,4 5,6 15 inch 426,78 423.16 430.71 0,0377 (6) ALL WATER SERVICES SHALL BE 3/4" TYPE K COPPER AND ALL SEWER CB 63 CB 62 110 7.9 13.2 18 inch 418.23 415.50 423.16 0.0248 SERVICES SHALL BE 4 SCHEDULE 40 PVC UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED,
I I ~ . ~ I ~ \ ~ / FES #20 15 12.7 7.5 4 12 I I ~ ~ ~ \ F 4 6,3 12 6 18 , ~ vA~_ ES q30 2 4 12 22 B 6 CB 62 DI 61 116 19.9 33.2 24 inch 412,30 408.00 421.28 D.D393 6 18 22 B 6 DI 61 FES 60 93 19,8 33.0 30 inch 407,50 406,00 411.75 0,0161 (7) CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
Iii I N W OR FORMERL I ~ `~;~A ~ / FES X40 15 9,3 7.5 4 12 I I, 0 ~ \ . 4 12 22 B 6
--I I i \ ~ ~ ~ / 4 1 ' II ' \ \ \ \ \ FES X50 15 9.0 7,5 2 4 12 22 B 6 TO CONSTRUCTION, LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANS 7.5 15 22 B 6 DI 92 CB 91 25 3.0 5,1 15 inch 440.20 440.00 445,00 0.0080 IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION BUT CAN BE CONSIDERED
~ I J O HN A P W L L T ~ v ~ / FES y60 30 10.5 15 7.5 15 ' II I / ,,,,~,I ~ v~ ~ `vim / FES X80 18 7.0 9 4.5 13.5 I ~ ~ ~ / I `A CONCRETE PIPE 4.5 13.5 22 8 6 CB 91 Ex PE 18" 24 3,0 5.1 18 inch 439.74 439.00 X443.20 0.0098 ONLY AS APPROXIMATE.
I I .I I~ PIN 0761.03-40- 7899 \ ~ / , , , , / ,u. ~ F / ALL DISSIPATORS SHALL HAVE FABRIC UNDERLINERS. I II II ` I \ ~ : ~ ~ COLLAR, ~DERLINERS. EX PE 18" CB 81 20 1.1 1.9 18 inch 448.42 447.68 449.81 0.0366 (g) BENCHMARK IS RIM OF EXISTING MANHOLE AT THE TOWN OF CARY CB 81 FES 80 40 1.1 1.9 18 inch 447.40 446.50 ~454.t0 0.0225 ~ry~ INTERCEPTOR, ELEV, IS 399.56
I I ~ I DB 9143 PG 1283 ~ ~ r ~~~~~e, ~ ~ ~~°v _ NEEDED. ~ I , r ~ F-i s , \ \ /
,Iil II ' / ~ p \ ~ v\ III ~ I / I w ~ ST / , (9) TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND RIPARIAN BUFFER LOCATION FROM
III II ~R r -ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT TOWN OF CARY SURVEY BY WITHERS do RAVENEL. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS
III I• I ~ o Fr v~ , III I I ~ ~ , ~ / / -RIM ELEVATION GIVEN FOR CB IS TOP OF CURB AND FOR DI IS TOP OF GRATE (10) WHERE THE STATIC WATER PRESSURE IS IN EXCESS OF 80 PSI, A
I I I~ I; I I a s qp \ 5 STRIP OFF RED l0 -ALL PIPE IS TYPE III RCP UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE SHALL BE PROVIDED INSIDE THE BUILDING -DI IS NCDOT STD, 840.14 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS DF THE PLUMBING CODE.
~~t / a , , F °'r1>,~, ~ \ BE DEDICATED A PUBLIC R W I M \ ~ I INDICATES Q25 - INDICATES 0-RING GASKETED RCP (11) SANITARY SEWER MAINS INSTALLED WITH A DEPTH OF COVER OF 14 FEET
I , , ~ ~ ~ 2000 PG 1082 ~ TO 20 FEET SHALL REQUIRE SPECIAL BEDDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH VERIFY RIM AS PART OF SURVEY STAKEOUT CARY STANDARD 07000.13, SEWER SERVICES INSTALLED WITH A DEPTH OF
~ I I TbC S 040 0.04 \ \ . g, \ \ Ir N w I ~ ~y, COVER OF 8 FEET TO 14 FEET SHALL REQUIRE CLASS I BEDDING
, , - = = = = = = - l~ a I ~ Y~ REM IN ,:wa \ ~ a - FROM 4" BELOW THE SERVICE TO 4" INCHES OVER THE SERVICE UNE.
~ I aII ~ \F ~ F SEWER MAINS AND SERVCES INSTALLED WITH A DEPTH OF COVER OVER 14 FEET SHALL REQUIRE DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR THE ENTIRE RUN
' ~ ~ , ~ o ! o I ; EXTENDS AND THE BETWEEN MANHOLES OR CLEANOUTS,
I = ~ a ' ~ ~ ~TOC STD 4000 05 Ir~nx ~r ~r ra ~ , I V ~ I ~ it l / F \ (12) MINIMUM SLOPE FOR FOUR INCH SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE
I ~ I ; ; ~ TO BE CON TRUCE ~ 4as I ' I ~ 1.0~. CLEANOUTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS \ BUT SHALL BE SPACED AT NO GREATER THAN 75 LF FOR 4"
AT D192. ~ ~ ~ v~ . I ~ m l l N. ° ` ``'~K"` SE IMEN1 \ SERVICES. ALL CLEANOUTS SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES
I ~ , ~ ~ t~1 \ sX ~ F t I : I I 6~4SIN #92 fprA,::~ °o \ ABOVE FlNISH GRADE OR MEET THE OPTIONAL CLEANOUT REQUIREMENT \ METHODS AS SPECIFIED IN CARY STANDARD 07000.10, CLEANOUTS LOCATED
I - - - - - - - \ IN PAVED AREAS MUST HAVE CAST IRON RISERS, FITTINGS & BRASS CAPS.
I ~ (III rE ~p• I j~ , ~ ~ E4r / 'Fri \ ''T' \ (13) THERE IS NO FEMA MAPPED FLOOD PLAIN LOCATED ON THIS PROJECT PER FIRM
~ I _ FT \ MAPS 3718300515 E, BOTH DATED MARCH 3, 1992.
i I i ~ ~'h 'ti ~ 1w u ie'uw~ ~G \ 4 ( ~ 15,8 - eM? ~~X A\ \ (14) TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR \ TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT. FENCING SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED
~ 6 L~ ~ ;:,a, I ~ 24,667 SF _ . ~ , ~ ~ ~ \ ADJACENT TO AREAS WITHOUT WOODED VEGETATION.
- - ~ ~ ~ , a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .O 15 BLOWOFF ASSEMBLIES IN TRAFFIC AREAS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER
A I SURVEYO ~ T F ~ \ s i R R \ ~ ~ ( ) AR A RE UIREMENTS, TOWN OF CARY TRAFFC E Q
~ ~ VERIFY CB 1~,~4T \ . \ . - A ' ~ ~ ` ~ i , v~ ~ , I I ~ s. ~ Low Fpl OF z , y C (16) THE TOWN OF CARY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ANO DETAILS WERE REVISED
I I I , , 14 AD~V \ • \ s ,923 8~3 , ~ ~ \ 4/15/04. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED IN
i , i . ~ ~ \ ~ \ ~ ~ 0 y ACCORDANCE WI1H THESE SPECIFICAT10N5.
~ a~- ,I \ "
1. s LIMITS ? \ _ , ;I~,~ \ v , ~ - ; 24 x12 TAPPING
I ~ ; CONS ACTION ~`v A, Y , II i;' 4 , sp, \ , SLEEVE & VALVE
~ I 8 911 SF I~ ~ S \ Q F , ` 40 LF 20" CASING ~ " PIPE TO BE BORED
~ ~ q ~ , ~ y~ s W I . » Fx`~ 18 100 SF 9e. Np FF \ ~ r r ~ , T .~o I \ I AND JACKED
I 2 BLOWOFF , , C S \ , \ C ~ _ ~ A PORTION OF a o qA ~ 11F' - ' WN OF CARY PLANNING DEPT. REQUIRED NOTES TO
w J \ - A~35Y (~~fP'~ ~ ~ s ~ S w I~ I A s !yF GRENADIER I, e ~ b~ / I /
~ D 1, TO MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO EXISTING TREES NEAR THE INTERIOR EDGE OF BUFFERS
c1 I ~ ~ ~ AND STREETSCAPES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CUT MINIMUM 2~ TRENCHES ALONG a ~ THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, SO AS TO CUT RATHER THAN TEAR ROOTS.
~,;e ~ ~~0= ~ zz ~ tt ~ ~ , 6 ~ 6~ ~ \ F
, `9 v ~ ~ 18 425 F a S fF VEL ~ 1 ' \ 7°'` ~ ~ 2. THE TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE UNTIL ALL SITE ~
~ ~ ,V ~ / ~ti : , I r .6, ~ 'zz , CON UCT N . WORK IS COMPLETED AND THE FINAL SITE INSPECTION IS SCHEDULED. THE ~ - `~~~\~;''~F
I 4, 836 SF ; » NTRA C ~ \ Q~ ~ 4 SEWER- SE,R ' ~ ~ ~ ~ FENCING SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. \ ) ~
IMIT F 1J ,A v 10 ~ W ~E~ GYP ~ I 2~.~
I o. ~ ) r CTION ~ ~ ml, ~ ,
\ ~ \ '~J'. ~ b ~ - 13 849 SF r ~ ;i ~ • ^ ' V I. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oro ; ;
rn ~ ry \ I , I _ ~ .y , , ~ / eat ! ~
. , 1vt~~' ~ W - ~d _ ~ ° ~ A SILT... AN £T ~ F ~ ~
V I~ 0 445 ~ i ' FE FENCE ~ C ~ - ~ \ \ off' ~ ~u,, - \
I ~ ~ = ~ - - ~ 335 ~ ~ N ~ ~ VrCE TAP ~J' ~ i ~ ~ . s R ( ~ r 19,643 SF w' ~ ~ V ~ \ ta#IJS OF , /e OFF ,,.y \ , z3
\ \ ~ 18 1 2 SF i ' ti ~ DAnICHT ,w CON UCTION M , ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ° ~ \ \
O \ oo I I , . ~ ~ .LINE TYP i ~ , , icy , { . • \ , a 11 ( ) ; FILLS A \ R ~ \ \ rnuE ~ I ~ i ' ~ , „~I,- / ~ ~I HYDRANT
~J ob ~ I o o STORM / ; AREA ~ ~ , '~~j _ < TO ~ ; ~CATEDfES:9 CONCRETE PIP ~ ~ z4 \
V ~ c , ' r ~eranut ' i ~ . ~ t ~ ~ASE1~F'`' w~2, 2 ~ y r. I ~ ~ ~ 14 221 SF 1 / ~ ~ 3 ; R ~ s2 ~ f, ~ ~ . ~I~. 73 ~ COLLAR, IF v ~
, I ,NEEDED. ~ ~ ~ ~
~ \ ~ s . ~ ~ - / a1 18,168 SF e 4 ; \ ~ ME ~w. 1gIN I / 5 F , ~ 11 Il ! I68 SF ~ ~ ,gas~N~ I I ~ ~ ti ~ ~ v w ~ ~
2 ~ I.. ~440~ 5 C 3 00 12 X$ CROSS ~q ti ; , , ~ ~ ~ ~ .~r i ~ ~ ° ~
~p \ ~ t YH~18 -..,~,,,r ~ o i ~ z ~ 12 x6 REDUCED/ Bx s - ~ ~ ~ ~ r » » ; C ~ o ~ ~ .Ta+ ~ ~ ~ 44 I 8x4 REDUCER REDUCED/ ' / , w ~ ~ ~ ~ \
~ o S » , _ _ z2 cH 6~ ,~a~ . 1, ~ 0 1v so , ~ 12 GV a _ ~ ~ ~ ,i SEDUCER ~ ; - ; ~ / ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 15, 9 58 $F , ~ i ~ v ~ ~ ; 450- J
' x,~ 6 S~ r, TORM / S1C IO, r, , ; ~ , i I lL. n~~ 2s.
GRAVEL ~ 3,}` EASEME ~ ~ » » ~ w 7-- ; ~ I wb. ~ 8x4 TES FIL i , x0
CONSTRUCTI(Ra , ~ ~ x ~ ,,$,,.G~ r a / , / . S , I~~~~ _ I z, Ol I'! ~ , I t1+.wk~" ~eL, D fJ° i n I, I ~ r _ ~ ~ ~ 1/ ~ ' - - i ~ ~ ~
ENTRANCE ~ I ~ 4 GV \ r~ I ~ ~ - i ~6 094 ~~F
n1 I I ~t01AT 7 ~ ~ / ~i o~ . .I~ ` 'x 1 1 ~ -435 ~ v~ r;: I "b^ 1~ ~ i ~ \
til 1 I , .p 1 * I ~'r .r0001A11 nK ~ ~ _ .~J `'~r. ~ •O Q y lP 6 I- I / ~ I ~ i ,r• i ~I \ \
A PORTION OF ; w I ~ ~ ~ , I ~ ~ ~ 5~ ~ LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN ~ a
~ ~ i~ ,~-408 SF r 6.5 ~ I~ y ~ .r ~ ~ N s4. ti~S~ b ti~ _ ~ ~ ~ 1 f n h F m Elev. A- ti p \
GRENADIER ~ , ~ o , :.14,985 SF , I I I .r 'I "'~5 9 „ A o ~ : ~ ITS of , x8~ CROSS , ~ \ ~ o 03~ ~ - i outlet D o (c s) Le gt (L der ~ ~z~x • 2D 5.3 69 423 ti S
~ ~ a I I ~ 62 . ~A3 , ' 0 STRUCT40N ~ 14,443 SF , • , , _ , ~ 4„ MB 2001 PG 1575 ; .~r,~,,,E _ , _ >r 411 ~q ~ 30 16.3 212 422.75 -
~a l _ 6 REDUCER":; a \ IM NT sroR,,~-_.~ ~1.. ~ ~ ~ .M ~ i ~ ~ 4D 6.3 82 407 \
~ I E9ENT,.<~ ~ _ FIRE H RANT ~ I F 4,007 F ~ ~ti~ - A - LEV L 3ASIN #30 ~ 1 i .-Z SSI~ ~ P ~ T ~ ~ 4 52 423 • ~ - - m I ~ _ 10111, ~ I ~
- 1; MIS ~ ,r;l, ~ r ~ ~ ) , P ~ , r e+~a ael ,?~T RM PR ADFR, , ES_30 . _ _ ~ ~ ~ ; 66 ~ , ~ .,fie oaRM ~ ~ ~ S E ~ , "'14 354 S : ~ - \
I . al~,>~„~. /,v,,, ~ C STR CT~01d- EJ ! A ~ , . _ - - ~ ' y- \ , _ ~
32: o~ rwk,:~E H ~ ~ ' i ~ i s ~ ,-a`~ , - - I I n~ , _ - 1
. . ~ ~ 'Y i' N . \ ~ 006 F~ rl ~ , ' m ~ _ - -F `I r ' 1 \ s°; I
I ~8, S ~ 15 ~ I,- •Y~RS ~ _ \ V ~ ~ ` \ ~ ~ ~ ` ' '1 I~ 4+ _ y, ~ I
4 D~ W A i ' i ~ "y~ ~ :I ~ \ 1LDIVERSION DITCH N / ~ J I J ` , - ~ ~r 20~` I, ,BERM AS NEEDED TO DIRECT ~ e ; ~ ; W~ '@~' a wRr1 IQ ~ . r 69
/ _ ~ ~ ~ / axe / .'Se'~ • - T ' ` ~ ~ ~ ~ xr out - , I ® t _ _ . ,N,® 1 y
S ORM RUNOU~F..~O-°SB~ 30 ~ I •b• - - - ~ 'L, , 68 dsl ~ N 301 ~ sf~ ~ - ~ a~o~o~ coNrna ~ECENo
I 'I h .e e,. ~ i ..i A ,l- ~ y~~~ I / \ - i
N~~; a ~ ~ ~ - . ~2~8 ~ SF ~ e ! ~2~8 ~ S~ A _ "y N J CAR ' ~ 1 - ~ RIP RAP FII.iER BASIN •a 4
/ I 'I - ~ 4 ~ ~,i~ ,r vrN« o 209
ale - . 'T ,I noiavx ~ _ iq -NORM i~ - I -t7 ~d pF ON - - - - 1t~ ~ } at->f-K-~ T FENCE ~ 9
,6.50 SF ` I ~ ~ 99 EASEMENT~'II ~ I ~ LIMITS OF ~ 1 ~ _ CHA Sll ; Q ~ • if - < ~ ~ : AN S I i ~ SEAL „ ..,1. TL D
~ I y , _ _ _ TR~IGT~ON- ~ ~ ' ~ -3 \ ~ ~ NT - - I oIVER~oN aTCH BERM 's 16269 x_ , ~ APPROVED : ,
, BIN ~ ~ : : v P - / I . y • ~G ~ _ _ . / I, . CHECK DAM TOWN OF CARY ti, t
/ r - II ry_r_c.______._._,-__ i', ~_Q ~
' ~ _ ~ ~ LIM TS OF ' SPRE SPREADER ~ / E. Ca i ~ WETLANDS A roved b Date h.,•
~ ~ II,-!: - . x~ . ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION .
-TP- TREE PROTECTION FENCING riannmg ua~e
Engineering Date
f ~ - 183, SF SCALE: 1 = 60
No. Revision Date B Designer Scale '
A TOC 1st REVIEW COMMENTS 11/22/04 GAS W&R 1"=60' WATER SAN
B TOC 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 1 /03/05 GAS Drawn By Date SANITARY Sheet No, STORM DRAINAGE WITHERS R"ENEL 2 SEWER,
C TOC 3rd REVIEW AND NCDOT COMMENTS 1 24 05 GAS GAS 10/4/04 WRENN MEADOW
Checked By Job No. AND AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel.-919-469-3340 fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com
JAB 203141.1

I; , I ~ - _ - - ,
' 33 ~ 02 _ ~ f
/ f I \ ~a~ - ~ - ; ~ ~ LI I S OF , _ ~ ~ - _-_I EROSION CONTROL 8c STORM DRAT A ra ~ _ _ ~ 'V / 1 A CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF GARY
I / r_r _.c._._. _ C N TRUCTION _ ~ O Ll - , STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS REVISED APRIL 15, 2004.
I ~ ~'~i I , I, - _ P I O I ~ _ ~ ,J~,'<~ , : _ j,~'~ ~ (2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CARE TO AVOID DISTURBING
r f i _ ~1 EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL DURING SEWER LINE CONSTRUCTION ALL P
~ I ~ IL_ T ~1 ' SANITARY SEWER PIPE STREAM CROSSINGS AND DISTURBANCES SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH 22° CLASS 1 RIP-RAP WITH FABRIC UNDERLINER.
+s1 d 1~ ~ ~ YY ~ 1°,' ~ ~ ~ (3) CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES I i
I . 1`$,26 SF DURING THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT. ~r
~ I l - ~ EXISTING POND ~ ~ I - ,I / ~n, (4) CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DIVERSION DITCHES AS NECESSARY TO
206` - ~1-----`-- I TO REMAIN . ~ ~ ~ ~ , COMBINATION TREE F'_'''_ - I J PROTECTION ANO 50' / ~ I ENSURE ALL SEOIMENTIS DIRECTED INTO EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. - - - ' I
I 1 ~ .4 O--r~' ~-"i ~ ~ (5) ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL BE PROTECTED PER i0C STD. 04000.14 UNLESS ~ , _ ~ NOTED OTHERWISE. 2 ,;'i~ ~
o , r + g ~ ~ SILT FENCE AT TOE - ~ ~ ~ (6) CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
~ I I 1 U I OF ROAOWA F LOTS 18 AND 19 MAY RE DIRE ~ / \ ~ I 4 Y ILL ~ # # Q ~ , EDII~ i i ~ TO CONSTRUCTION. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANS /
~ I 1 SLOPE, / - _ . INDIVIDUAL GRINDER PUMPS TO ~ 1,H 15 / - ~;,r. ~ #5O ~ ! ~ ^ IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION BUT CAN BE CONSIDERED ^~I +^~Z ~tii` , - ~ ONLY AS APPROXIMATE.
~ I ~ ~ ~ 1 I SERVE THEM. I. I i ~ ~ I ~P,~ y ~ (7) BENCHMARK IS RIM OF EXISTING MANHOLE AT THE TOWN OF GARY
~ la/y~ 18,6 5 SF.-~ ~ ~ REFER T SHEETS D1-D8 iW e, I I O CC fASEM {VT w j, _ ~ ~V ~ ~ ~ SEWER INTERCEPTOR. ELEV. IS 339,56
J 1 ~ / . ' ~ ~ FOR DAM IMPROVEMENTS ~ i ~ ~ m + DESIGN & SE UENCE ` . I ~ (8) TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND RIPARIAN BUFFER LOCATION FROM
L I ~ ~ ~ Q ~ - ~ ~ / 4}' ' ~ SURVEY BY NATHERS & RAVENEL. "Z~, ~0- S F' CO 57 ~ _
~ / 1 io / n `i. w ~ ~ ~ INFORMATION. ~ ~ ti o (9) CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR FOR PIPE AND CONSTRUCT PI ~ - . _ ,d,~" CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE AND SEDEMENT BASINS AT PIPE
1 ~ ' _ ~ -l,y! 11 ~ ~ 1 N ENDS AND DIVERSION DITCHES AND THEN BEGIN GRADING ROADWAYS. ' 17 21.5 SF 'I ~
0 - 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IV ~I ' ' PRI TO GRADING !i! IN TA LED OR ,L ~ I, / . 10 IF STORM CROSS DRAINAGE CAN NOT BE S l ( > 1 i•"~~'" ~ ~ ~ ~;u~~ ~ TOC STD. 040000.11 SHALL BE USED TO CROSS WET WEATHER CHANNELS.
1~9 ~ ~ ~ f?~ ~ o
~ I i m.~~ - i / - ~ ~ ~ 1`~. ~ ~ i ' 11 CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE GRADING OPERATION IS CONDUCTED IN A L.i ( ) N
I I - I I I ~ , , ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ 21,626, SF / ~ . , , ! , \ i ~ i ~ ? ~ I °w ~ NOW OR FORMERLY MANNER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW ANY SEDIMENT INTO CREEKS OR PO DS. .1 ~ i ' ~ t ~ % (12) STORM WATER DISCHARGES INTO CAMP BRANCH, TRIBUTARY OF MIDDLE CREEK.
_ i ~ ~ V _ ~ I % 1 t ~ ~ ~ 58~ , ! GARY ALLIANCE CHURCH ~ - ~ w /wi ~I ~~I 58 r
SEDIMENT , / , A ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ~ i - i .1 (13) ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPE SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION . ,55- ~ 4r /I ~'~i i` i~ PIN 0760.02-68-4403 IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOC STD. DETAIL 0400D,12.
I ( ~ BASIN 6 r ; . 1 ~ ~ ~ ) / ~ , 59 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~6 043 f 1
1 043 ~ L I ~P ~ ~ I , ` I MB 2001 PG 608 14 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RIP RAP LINED TAIL DITCHS AT THE STORM I ~ - © ~ I' j DRAINAGE PIPE DISCHARGE POINTS AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE POSITIVE
~ , ~ 1~3 7 7 SF ~"I T ~ ~ ~ ~ 296 ~ ~ DB 8871 PG 04 DRAINAGE. T ~1~e M ! r I
~ZQ~~ i / WET IAN c, , ~ - I ~ , ~ _ ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ (15) SEDIMENT BASINS SHALL BE KEPT OUT OF WETLAND AREAS. - - "1- -w , a'n[ i i~ ' ~ - - - ~-""I O
- ' i , c~ ' J f' , ~T,/~ . - I I ~r..l (16) THERE IS NO FEMA MAPPED FLOOD PLAIN LOCATED ON THIS PROJECT PER FIRM _ + ~ >y ' ? MAP 37183C0515E DATED MARCH 3, 1992. ~ ~ ,
`t , ~ , is - , _ ; 4 TAN WETLANDS .i ~,y a ; ~ ~ 30 GREENWAY wE ~ DS _ 1 q , „ / MH MH O ' ~ ~1 'i~ ~ ! IRARErCM 17 A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THIS CONSTRUCTION.
EASEMENT I ~ - - ~ BEGli~F' ~ Qhi$I ON ' ~To~M ~ ~ , 1 $61 ,S~ s h ~ i is 4p ( ) (18) PERMANENT GROUND COVER SHALL BE ESTABLISHED EITHER IN 15 WORKING
I ~ ~ - E EMEN ~ c~., 00 BASIN 40~~ ,3 TP~SIL'T FE ~ (9 a rr ' DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS, WHICHEVER IS SHORTER, PER TOWN OF CARP 4 - •nwE pU
~ _ ~ ~ 61 , ~ ~ o LIMI S,OF 4 r/ „ i REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. ~ Mr rxE
W I ; ~ 30 ZONE ~ _ ~ k ' h o ~ Ct~V3T~UCTI ~ ~ I- ~ ' o t- , / , 1~~'` ! I (19) TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR ~K / ~54 ~ ';h~ ~ GV' / , " ~ 70 ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT. FENCING SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED
a ~ 14, 05 SF `1 ~ 20 ZONE, ,y ~r,, , ~ ~ Il ~ I - ~ ~ I ADJACENT TO AREAS WITHOUT WOODED VEGETATION. ` fir ~ , i'O ° a, ~ r~ ~
RM ~ ~ X , ~ ~ ~.rt+ nya'',+1 ' ~ , ~ 1'6 7'65 , SF~ q (20) THE TOWN OF CARP STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS WERE REVISED ~ -'i+nxe ' ~O1f 4/15/04. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED IN
I - EASEMENT IJ~'~/~J ~ ,Hµ~ I 1 L V l LIMITS OF ACCORDANCE WITH THESE SPECIFICATIONS. REFER TO REVISED GARY DETAILS
n ~i ~ ` ~ ~ ~1 \ t fit/ 0 ~ , a - SPR A r _ ~ d~ CONSTR~U~ N ` 6v ~R"" 21 ALL CATCH BASIN HOODS SHALL BE STAMPED "DRAINS TO RIVER" = ~ i ~ WITH 3/4" HIGH LETTERING.
• . ' ~ 40 r . ; .16, 572 SP . , ,o Mr ~ ' , - /,r ~ ~ - ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ i ~ x ~ i
NOW OR FORMERLY of ~ ; , , ~ o.` k~ I r~ . , , / ~ ~ " ~ , h ,'i ~ ~ (22) ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT
6 766 F ' I,, . , luI~s~o ~ ~ ~ 1 S ~ WILLIAM C. JONES - ` - ~ , - L ~ . . = ~ , I ~ ~ , ~r ,.~UCTaON, 6 ~ o ~ SF P ~ti ~ GROUND COVER WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS, i i ~ WHICHEVER IS SHORTER. : G~~,. ~ i I~ ~ ~ 1
r,' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x f, ' ~ - ' ~ ~ , j M ; o x•32 ~ ; ~ PIN 0760.01-48-3103 ~ ~ 14;x69 o ~6 , ~ 3:, ~ 1, I ' {23) ALL STREETS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT SHALL BE KEEP CLEAN AT
I , \ Ik ~ p r / ko , ~j ~ ' ~ I,' i ro ALL TIMES OR A WASH STATION WILL BE REQUIRED. r , , •o
DB 2905 PG 31 , ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ , i k 6 ~ ~ ~ I I 0 (24) THE PROJECT MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS RELATIVE TO BEST MANAGEMENT I - I 11 SC~ 1" PRACTICES AND ENGINEERED STORMWATER CONTROL STRUCTURES A5
z6 & ~8' ~ TEE I ~ / OlOg+ql ~ y +eP~ OUTLINED IN THE TOWN OF GARY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
' ~ " ~ ~1 1 g4 SE , ~ ~ -2-8 Gv ~ II r, ~I ~ , ~ / I n~ op I ~ i I CHAPTER 10, PART 3. / i ,a
~'Y'L~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ , ~ .38 , . , , 41 ' M 31~ f 140' (25) RISER STRUCTURES MUST BE ON SITE BEFORE GRADING PERMIT IS ISSUED. ~ '41 1! I _ _ _ _ _ (26) WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS.
I ~ ~ DAYLIG T, / 16; 869 S ti { ~ , I I t -
~ ; ~ M, ~ ~ LINE ~r a~ ' 12 17f 8 SF I I ; ~ ` 1 ~ 281 ~ o ~ p ; s, --i (27) EACH LOT SHAII BE CLEARED INDIVIDUALLY. IF MULTIPLE LOTS ARE 1$,281 SF , ~ I i~i ~ / ~ CLEARED SIMULTANEOUSLY AND THE REVISED AREA IS GREATER THAN
I ~ I r ~ , Mk~~~~ ~ i I 1 tx ~ ~ I m , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 37 ~ / _ _ _ - - ~ -~-~-I-- LIMITS ~ OF I ! ~ i I 12,000 SF, AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LIMITS; OF' ' ! b ! ~ ~ i TOWN OF GARY FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION,
I ( , ~ i ~ ~ ~ --~---1 o I ~w;, p , ~ ; ~p F,~ x ~ ORM ~ ~ i i CONS I I~UIi ~ - _ I a 52 i CONS1`RU~TION ! I ~ i
i _ 'I~~~ ` ~ i I / L3 ~eASEM NT ' 30~ - I I E 1 1 ~ 24' 81' 12g, ~I` , 2 06 SF , _ 69' - - _ _ ; ^--i i (28) DENUDED AREA = 10.0 ACRES 129' I ' i _ ~ 14 00 SF I
I I , ~ _ 'L - _ I ~ ~ _ Y. - l'' 1.- i - i, ~ , i - u r I _ it I ! r,I.
1 - I ' / 1 / i I f ;'1 5 259 F S 6 , ~ , ~ I lY ___1 _ _ ,
, I -i SIGHT ~ ~ /5 7 ~ I I , ~ , I i ~ - A ~ ~ . ~ I I~, I ~a - - i I
i iqJ ~ ~ , EaSEMENT~nI 4 74 SF ~ ~ I , ~ ~ , ~ ~ 1 r ~ ~ I I ~ ~ 1 1 1 , N ~--,AIR _ R 42 ,
I - ~ ~ ~6 ~ ~ , , 42 i I , 1 ~ ,a ~o a ; i +'~VALVE AND.; i
t ~ o s' 31 ;a I; ; ~ ~ ~ 5~. / ; ~ - 15,493 SI oi~i ; MANH + ,.15,493 SF ~ "
i , I I I ~1 I
~ ~ 24 SILT I , ~ 26 ~ , ~ PROPOSED FUTURE V ° ~ ~ . s 6 ' 11 o~, 13,142 SF , FENC ~ ~ , ~ I ~ , ~17 65 SF ' ` I j 11 1 \ ~l i ~ I ~ I
SEWER LINE BY ~ ~ ,a, _ _ ; 14~' 11 ~ SF'.
T WN F ARY 1.3;444~SF N 1 ~ ~ , ~ 0 o C ~ 35 - , ~ I , , ~ i ' i.~ i ~r \\`IMfI V' ' I
I , _r._ 1 i 1 - --~4_-__ i i \ ~
~ ~ ,6LOWO~F - 1 b' , 1 ;126+'33.1 .,026 SF ; ~ , - `r-~-- - I 12,403 SF ~ ~ I ~ p ,A ~,4S ~`t(TYP) , 1'47'
~ -
/ ' ~ _ li ' I l._._ ~ '
~ 'Ie~ ~ ~ ~ 14136 ~SF' , I 36 ~SF,; ; ~ Y , \ I
~ ~ ~ - I r-'_,-- ~ ~ i I ' 50 i
I ~ 1 ,I ~ 1 I I 1 \ 110 i,, \ I I
I ~ I I ~ ~ I 1 ~ \ , ~ ~ ~ 116 07 SF~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ A, I ~ 3 I ~ *~3 44 1 A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ' ~7 234 SF i ~
•t ~ ~ o ~rrx9" TEE ~ ~ ' I
l i I I N I 1 ~ ' \ ~ ecr d i ~ - 33 ~ 1 A I. ~ v I i 13 16 `~F , I ~ -4 GV _ /
i ~~I ~ i ~ 2 ' (LIMIT OFI ~ 19,446,SF ~ ~ s ° r,, - " T92' 8 ~~y~~---~"'" ___,I _ - 1 /
~ w. ~ 1~2 ~ I C~9N TRUCTIO ( ~ , . ` ~ ' I ~ I 5 138 SF ~ ~ ~L.~ ~ ~ r~' m I ~ ~ . Iti I 1 I i -
h~.e'~Y ~ ,1,6...s i 1\ - :0~ I N ~Q RM I ~ - STORM ~ t4.1s,.. ~•~I~v I ~ ~ CB ~ ~ EASE NT 43 In r, ~ _ M - 60 I e \ ° 'I ~ / I 'ti -i.
' I. ~I _ 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ Nj i y' 0 I I /
' ( of i I DRY DETENTION BASIN MHi ~I I ~ ~ I ~ - - ~ , 1 ~ , ~ , ~ - _ ; A PORTION OF
~ M SHALL ALSO FUNCTION ~ ' I ~ ~ 26 ~ ~ , ~ s ~n 6 ~ / 6 ~ I '7
AS EROSION CONTROL s, ~ oo+zz ~ , • ~ ~ MH~~ h.-11.4 817 sF I ~ LES ARBRES
9 DEVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION 'I; I ~ ~ t 9. s I 1 + ~p I , ~ ,14,426 SF - o s os .p , I 1 n~. b W I i 0~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ' a-~ MB 1984 PG 1245 ~ I I
I. r , 6~ ~ i 36' ~g~ ~a;l~ 1 _ 44S
~ ~ , I' ~ _ _ ro 8 65 ~ / ' ; a LIMITS' ti t ~
Z~ I~'' `NORM ' ` ~ FIR HY RANT ~ MIT F' ' ` LIMITS OF ~ ~,4 - ~ ~ z, CONSTR mN E D ~ „~~I ~ r'-"I LI S 0 , ~N I~ ~ 1 EA EMENT~' ~ Y Q ~ ~ a w , ~ ~ ~ ~SSY- Y ~I I I CONSTRUCT ~ Al S OFD 2,~ ~1~ ~ ~i /
I" ~ ~ - - CONSTRUCTION fil 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ r, x8 EROS'S I I iiM i / 0 n n I , i iTRU~CT ~ Al ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
i~ Ia ~ ~ ~ ~ - 1 x4 REDUCE 'I - ~ ~ W ~ 2 ; ~ TEMPpRA~'Y SEDIMENT ~ , I I ~ ~ y` , w ~ I O h - _ ~ ~I I • I /
a , I ~ , 2 8 V I ;4 , ~ , ~ ~ 1 M ~ BAST ' 'UNTIL- - Y I ~ , ; ~ ~ 1 I ~ I i I~~~
~ :dal J~ IN ~ , a 28 Q + i ; 4 V ~ ~ . ; ~ 6,8 4 F ; ~ STREA AREA I 29 , 45 ~ I ~I ~w i~ ;I , I, ~ Q ~ ~ M I 17 20 SF, - 48 ~
~ I ~ , , ON III tli l ``1 \ I I I I.- I 17 ,I ~ I ~ / ' ~'47 ~ i i I i ~ ~ / ~ i !I
~~I 13,276 SF 14-1 ~ I ~ I , II' ~I I ~I r , ~ ~ I ' 2,88 SF` ~ , , ~ , I ~ ~ I ; - o ~ ~ i, ~ ~ - 1 2 ! I? ~ / 1~,,293'~SF ~I
~I ~ I ~ ~ ~ '1 , I I MHO , 1s I r '1 ~1 i , , ` it i
~ k '4' ' i-+ i --~_J i
r MH 1 ; TYPE NO CAPE AREA EAS ~ ' - - - - - ~ ~ - . _ _ 9 _ - _ _ -_20' T , -
117 1 YPF B LANDS( u~ dAf ~ 100 6q g1 ~ ~ ~ 'B' ,LANDSCAPE AR A T -
N 89 12 59 W 813.87 ~ XIST. MH °r"TIE TO \ 4,~ GRAVEL I; ~ i r, , N 89 07 38 W 214,22 /
\ EXIST, MH I i O / CONSTR CTi(~I I, ~ . \ \ COS/ TORMWATER ~
,ENTRAN E ~ I / \ \ MANAG MENT ESMt•T I ' I 53
I I ~ • \ \ ~ ~ /
48 ~ \ 47 i I c 4 52 \ \ I I o0
\ \ / ,,I, / ~ \ \ Ii l I f \ /
~ \ ~ ~l III \ ~ \ \ EXISTING 11 II ~ I - / ~N,auu.pr~
\ \ ~ H AT R 'll o li i E E o .I. 1 ~ ` CA • / qN R0~
~ ~ / I ~ WELL LOT \ \ ~ WATER ~lAl I ~ I _L LOT , ~ , ~ / SSl • 4'tis
/ I \ \ \ \ MB 1995 PG 6~ 1. I I 1 F~ 0 9 . ~5 PG 624 o ti ; ~ / Q~ 9f:
v v ~ / S I ~ \ vv ~ a • • • SEAL s •
\ \ ~ A PORTION OF ~ 1 / _ = 16269 s / ~ APPROVED : s •
\ ~ OAK CHASE PHASE 2 ~ • \ . ~ : / S, 9 Lti~
20' SAN, S WER \ \ ~ ~ \ \ ~ . - / TOWN OF GARY I \ ~ . ~ / s
\ ~ _ EASEMENT P MB 1995 PG 624 - _ _ \ \ ~ / E. CP ~A roved b Date n, PP Y ua~n
BM 1995, PG 24 ~ ~ ~ I z ~ ~ / \ n cn ~ nn
Kenning uate ou u °u
Engineering Date
SCALE: 1" = 60'
No. Revision Date B Designer Scale
A TOC 1st REVIEW COMMENTS 11 2 O4 GAS W&R 1"=60' WATER, SAI Sheet No.
8 TOC 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 1 03 05 GAS Drawn By Date R, SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAINAGE WITHERS RAVENEL 3
C TOC 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 1 24 05 GAS GAS 10/4/04 WRENN MEADOW ANE
Cy lob No. AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com
203141.1

I
00
NOW OR FORMERLY
JOHN A POWELL E I •�� / O� / _
PIN #0761.03-40-7899 �- - - - - -
DB 9143 PG 1283 l o�I 60'5 " x•00
°o 45' STRIP OFFERED TO
E DEDICATED A9PUBLIC R/W
1 ----------% �L---------/ I or
>a
2000 G 1082
00
T1/2 OF 78 6/B- - - -
aas \I>A 100' R/W
O e
It
h
-----I-----------------fi- 15 i '7
I7n 'Sen 24,667 SF \ '.�
Q)
\ \1\\1 ---- � � �c
A Q
I \ 14;923. SF
W I °.�`��F 'Q/ I LF OF SEWER ONES
%� \� / C) ENTRANCE MONUMENT /
v /
, AVERAGE SEWER FLOW (280 GPD/LOT)
�' 8 � AND LANDSCAPE /
I' DENUDED AREA (ACRES)
I ` � 'e, ��_ F EASEMENT ' IMPERVIOUS RFA AREA - INFRASTRUCTURE F
j 911 SF M" �- 60' ' r / OU SURFACE EA AS RUCTURE (S )
\ � � A PORTION OF �y � � 1,; - � .rrr` �y �( 7;lo� B B 100 SF `� i ;.^>. �y B°'�' 6�E•�c � _ ��\ � F � -- � � �-- � / SETBACKS
V GRENADIER o I ; p - ,� -/\� - R/W -,� y' F�jC,SCgA S y q, ��_ \ FRONT YARD
\ I MB 2001 PG 760 a I \ ,' iR OS F �,\� e
rn
--
\ Q SIDE YARD -MIN.
REAR YARD
O r-� 18 SF f
\y /
33 t¢,836 'SF
WAKE COUNTY PIN NUMBER
,
/
13,849 SF
C1j
/
,
\4114 y IQi �`,` J �, - - -22,�5
,, 19; 6 3 �,�c � v
C', \ 18,1 2 SF '� , Y � � �
/ -
'�(/ \ R 1 I , I, \ DE�OPER OWNER:
/ �/C \ ,•s'SS,,,,, ' \
270\1340 � " � _ FES®0 °r` \ \
� p /; 12 14, 221 SF 73 \ ��,�\ 1010 INVESTORS, LLC
_ -\ \
- o•.a 50_ R ( 27513 ES WAY
\ c r . 755 SF' -' > > - MH 3s` fit/ 18,168 St 2 \ a CARY,
N.C.
\v \ a 10 STAT
I I Op/ ,Q� ` aao a+vs TELEPHONE: [phone]
7
G >OV -- - +ss } 5. SFS FAX: [phone]
O 50 RAW - ATTN.
,
r� - To \ 45o-95� \ RANDY SMITH
•moi
B 34_I(OrtNE.T--',--�.- i / �
• - ---�-'mow - �: , , /.� I`
,
ENTRAI CE MONUMENTS 0.? I°�; >x CB - 1,
� TOWN OF CARY
I r _:,. - , � \ N 'Z
--t-6,_o94/SF 04 -SB -024
'SF \ \ \�
/ A PORTION OF _ - ,
GRENADIER W I. -63
vII �°"!5,9 SF F/ y V14,985 S "1 r s� .T, e,• ' \.ti ��a��
\ I MB 2007 PC 1575 a Ii
- - -...,,.. 14,443 F> MH
.- --- -,ma
- ._._.__.-. y 2 \/, A`?O , /dRT -
4-007 SF
_ �ETOR�EN/-
I �, • 1 TORN 25 = ' \ , �,' • /'�"'r _ E`" 1
_ \FES 30._
_ , r,o-wv,.. g,am,•. 4d,.. ; EASbn%1 `_ .. / fY� ` �, -__ 14,354 e
6
32 : o �I�r..,,y $CJ4 S�
67
CN I i - s
w� �
I vl' r.. 18,006 S� ,9sI>, la \ \
-
/ r -------------�
�-�--��.� i I �_� 14,301 SF -y
o T U C - IRI I ytx
V S
�"� 'I � r-.i�'f ' Flo ( ( � \42p� � ""` _ "`� • `' ' FEs_za 5 .
-
.650 Sr - ; Im I -
l sraRN '
P _ I� I I � •\ � EASEMENT
fl
ILLI
1 COMMON OPEN
- - - - - - - -
I j SPACE �� y -
GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWN OF
CARY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS AS REVISED JULY 1, 2004.
2, ALL PROPOSED STREET RIGHT-OF-WAYS SHALL BE 50' AND STREET WIDTHS
SHALL BE 27' BACK TO BACK UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE,
3. SETBACKS ARE SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CARY L.D.O.
CHECK THE CARY ORDINANCES FOR PORCHES, DECKS, GARAGES, ETC.
4. UTILITY AND PIPELINE EASEMENTS SHALL BE RECORDED AFTER
CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AS PART OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAT,
5. BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS BASED ON SURVEY BY WITHERS & RAVENEL.
6. DESIGN BASED ON TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY WITHERS & RAVENEL.
7. FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THESE PARCELS PER
FIRM MAP 37183CO515E DATED MARCH 3, 1992,
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANS
IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION BUT CAN BE CONSIDERED
ONLY AS APPROXIMATE.
9. ALL HANDICAP RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
TOWN OF CARY STD, 3.16 (REVISED 4/15/04),
10, ALL CUL-DE-SACS SHALL HAVE A 45' RADIUS FROM CENTER OF SAC
TO BACK OF CURB.
11, ALL STREET INTERSECTIONS BACK OF CURB RADII ARE 30' UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE.
12• AN ENTRY FEATURE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL
PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF ANY LOTS WITHIN THAT DEVELOPMENT PHASE
IF THE DEVELOPER DECIDES TO INSTALL THESE FEATURES.
13, STORMWATER DETENTION DEVICES VISIBLE FROM THE REAR YARD OF ANY
ADJOINING DWELLING SHALL BE SCREENED FROM OFF-SITE VIEWS,
14, ALL INTERSECTION SIGHT TRIANGLES ARE LOCATED WITHIN STREET R/W S
OR SHOWN OTHERWISE,
15, ALL SPECIALTY STREET SIGNS AND POST SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
TOWN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF CARY
POLICY STATEMENT NO.85 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
16. COMMON OPEN SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION.
17. WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS.
18, DELINEATED WETLAND AREAS SHALL NOT BE CLEARED, DRAINED, OR
OTHERWISE DISTURBED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY THE
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND NCDENR,
19, THE DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL INSTALLATION COST
ASSOCIATED WITH STREET LIGHTING ALONG ALL PROPOSED STREETS,
ADJACENT STREETS AND THOROUGHFARES AS REQUIRED PER TOWN OF
CARY POLICY STATEMENT NO, 13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL ALSO
CONTACT CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY IN ORDER TO
DEVELOP A STREET LIGHTING PLAN FOR THE SITE/SUBDIVISION PLAN
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
20. INSTALLATION OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS MUST OCCUR PRIOR TO
RECORDING OF LOTS OR A BOND MUST BE POSTED.
21, FENCING PROPOSED ALONG A THOROUGHFARE OR COLLECTOR STREET
SHALL BE OF UNIFORM DIMENSIONS, MATERIALS AND COLORS. IF
A FENCE PROPOSAL IS NOT PART OF THE APPROVED SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN, THEN INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO
INSTALL A FENCE UNLESS ALL LOT OWNERS ALONG A THOROUGHFARE OR
COLLECTOR STREET AGREE TO INSTALL ONE CONTINUOUS FENCE ALONG
ALL PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO THE STREET. IF A FENCE IS PROPOSED,
THEN EVERGREEN SHRUBS ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE FENCE AT A
5' SPACING WILL BE REQUIRED. STREET TREES, IF NOT INSTALLED AS A
PART OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED PLAN, MUST ALSO BE INSTALLED AT
NO MORE THAN 40' SPACING BETWEEN TRUNKS, IN ANY EVENT, ALL
FENCING ALONG A THOROUGHFARE OR COLLECTOR STREET MUST FIRST
BE APPROVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE FENCE.
No.
Revision
Date
B
I
SITE DATA
11/22/04
/
B
TOC 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS
/ I
GAS
C
TOC 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
ACR GE
GAS
/ I
I
COM�ON OPEN SPACE
DEDI TED THOROUGHFARE R/W ACREAGE
- -
EXIS ING THOROUGHFARE R/W ACREAGE
\
ZON NG
I
PRO�OSED NUMBER OF LOTS
MAXI UM NUMBER OF LOTS
\ , I
PRO SED DENSITY (DU/NET ACRE)
1 I
MAXIMUM DENSITY (DU/NET ACRE)
\
MINI UM LOT SIZE ALLOWED
-
\ I \ I
MINI UM LOT SIZE PROPOSED
\ I
\
AVE GE LOT SIZE
MI UM LOT WIDTHS
\ \ I
LF OF STREETS
\
/
LF OF THROUGHFARE WIDENING
-
\ -
- Lf� OF WATERLINE
I \ 14;923. SF
W I °.�`��F 'Q/ I LF OF SEWER ONES
%� \� / C) ENTRANCE MONUMENT /
v /
, AVERAGE SEWER FLOW (280 GPD/LOT)
�' 8 � AND LANDSCAPE /
I' DENUDED AREA (ACRES)
I ` � 'e, ��_ F EASEMENT ' IMPERVIOUS RFA AREA - INFRASTRUCTURE F
j 911 SF M" �- 60' ' r / OU SURFACE EA AS RUCTURE (S )
\ � � A PORTION OF �y � � 1,; - � .rrr` �y �( 7;lo� B B 100 SF `� i ;.^>. �y B°'�' 6�E•�c � _ ��\ � F � -- � � �-- � / SETBACKS
V GRENADIER o I ; p - ,� -/\� - R/W -,� y' F�jC,SCgA S y q, ��_ \ FRONT YARD
\ I MB 2001 PG 760 a I \ ,' iR OS F �,\� e
rn
--
\ Q SIDE YARD -MIN.
REAR YARD
O r-� 18 SF f
\y /
33 t¢,836 'SF
WAKE COUNTY PIN NUMBER
,
/
13,849 SF
C1j
/
,
\4114 y IQi �`,` J �, - - -22,�5
,, 19; 6 3 �,�c � v
C', \ 18,1 2 SF '� , Y � � �
/ -
'�(/ \ R 1 I , I, \ DE�OPER OWNER:
/ �/C \ ,•s'SS,,,,, ' \
270\1340 � " � _ FES®0 °r` \ \
� p /; 12 14, 221 SF 73 \ ��,�\ 1010 INVESTORS, LLC
_ -\ \
- o•.a 50_ R ( 27513 ES WAY
\ c r . 755 SF' -' > > - MH 3s` fit/ 18,168 St 2 \ a CARY,
N.C.
\v \ a 10 STAT
I I Op/ ,Q� ` aao a+vs TELEPHONE: [phone]
7
G >OV -- - +ss } 5. SFS FAX: [phone]
O 50 RAW - ATTN.
,
r� - To \ 45o-95� \ RANDY SMITH
•moi
B 34_I(OrtNE.T--',--�.- i / �
• - ---�-'mow - �: , , /.� I`
,
ENTRAI CE MONUMENTS 0.? I°�; >x CB - 1,
� TOWN OF CARY
I r _:,. - , � \ N 'Z
--t-6,_o94/SF 04 -SB -024
'SF \ \ \�
/ A PORTION OF _ - ,
GRENADIER W I. -63
vII �°"!5,9 SF F/ y V14,985 S "1 r s� .T, e,• ' \.ti ��a��
\ I MB 2007 PC 1575 a Ii
- - -...,,.. 14,443 F> MH
.- --- -,ma
- ._._.__.-. y 2 \/, A`?O , /dRT -
4-007 SF
_ �ETOR�EN/-
I �, • 1 TORN 25 = ' \ , �,' • /'�"'r _ E`" 1
_ \FES 30._
_ , r,o-wv,.. g,am,•. 4d,.. ; EASbn%1 `_ .. / fY� ` �, -__ 14,354 e
6
32 : o �I�r..,,y $CJ4 S�
67
CN I i - s
w� �
I vl' r.. 18,006 S� ,9sI>, la \ \
-
/ r -------------�
�-�--��.� i I �_� 14,301 SF -y
o T U C - IRI I ytx
V S
�"� 'I � r-.i�'f ' Flo ( ( � \42p� � ""` _ "`� • `' ' FEs_za 5 .
-
.650 Sr - ; Im I -
l sraRN '
P _ I� I I � •\ � EASEMENT
fl
ILLI
1 COMMON OPEN
- - - - - - - -
I j SPACE �� y -
GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWN OF
CARY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS AS REVISED JULY 1, 2004.
2, ALL PROPOSED STREET RIGHT-OF-WAYS SHALL BE 50' AND STREET WIDTHS
SHALL BE 27' BACK TO BACK UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE,
3. SETBACKS ARE SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CARY L.D.O.
CHECK THE CARY ORDINANCES FOR PORCHES, DECKS, GARAGES, ETC.
4. UTILITY AND PIPELINE EASEMENTS SHALL BE RECORDED AFTER
CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AS PART OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAT,
5. BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS BASED ON SURVEY BY WITHERS & RAVENEL.
6. DESIGN BASED ON TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY WITHERS & RAVENEL.
7. FEMA 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THESE PARCELS PER
FIRM MAP 37183CO515E DATED MARCH 3, 1992,
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANS
IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION BUT CAN BE CONSIDERED
ONLY AS APPROXIMATE.
9. ALL HANDICAP RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
TOWN OF CARY STD, 3.16 (REVISED 4/15/04),
10, ALL CUL-DE-SACS SHALL HAVE A 45' RADIUS FROM CENTER OF SAC
TO BACK OF CURB.
11, ALL STREET INTERSECTIONS BACK OF CURB RADII ARE 30' UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE.
12• AN ENTRY FEATURE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL
PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF ANY LOTS WITHIN THAT DEVELOPMENT PHASE
IF THE DEVELOPER DECIDES TO INSTALL THESE FEATURES.
13, STORMWATER DETENTION DEVICES VISIBLE FROM THE REAR YARD OF ANY
ADJOINING DWELLING SHALL BE SCREENED FROM OFF-SITE VIEWS,
14, ALL INTERSECTION SIGHT TRIANGLES ARE LOCATED WITHIN STREET R/W S
OR SHOWN OTHERWISE,
15, ALL SPECIALTY STREET SIGNS AND POST SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
TOWN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF CARY
POLICY STATEMENT NO.85 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
16. COMMON OPEN SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION.
17. WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS.
18, DELINEATED WETLAND AREAS SHALL NOT BE CLEARED, DRAINED, OR
OTHERWISE DISTURBED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY THE
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND NCDENR,
19, THE DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL INSTALLATION COST
ASSOCIATED WITH STREET LIGHTING ALONG ALL PROPOSED STREETS,
ADJACENT STREETS AND THOROUGHFARES AS REQUIRED PER TOWN OF
CARY POLICY STATEMENT NO, 13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL ALSO
CONTACT CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY IN ORDER TO
DEVELOP A STREET LIGHTING PLAN FOR THE SITE/SUBDIVISION PLAN
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
20. INSTALLATION OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS MUST OCCUR PRIOR TO
RECORDING OF LOTS OR A BOND MUST BE POSTED.
21, FENCING PROPOSED ALONG A THOROUGHFARE OR COLLECTOR STREET
SHALL BE OF UNIFORM DIMENSIONS, MATERIALS AND COLORS. IF
A FENCE PROPOSAL IS NOT PART OF THE APPROVED SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN, THEN INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO
INSTALL A FENCE UNLESS ALL LOT OWNERS ALONG A THOROUGHFARE OR
COLLECTOR STREET AGREE TO INSTALL ONE CONTINUOUS FENCE ALONG
ALL PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO THE STREET. IF A FENCE IS PROPOSED,
THEN EVERGREEN SHRUBS ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE FENCE AT A
5' SPACING WILL BE REQUIRED. STREET TREES, IF NOT INSTALLED AS A
PART OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVED PLAN, MUST ALSO BE INSTALLED AT
NO MORE THAN 40' SPACING BETWEEN TRUNKS, IN ANY EVENT, ALL
FENCING ALONG A THOROUGHFARE OR COLLECTOR STREET MUST FIRST
BE APPROVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE FENCE.
No.
Revision
Date
B
A
TOC 1st REVIEW COMMENTS
11/22/04
GAS
B
TOC 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS
1/03/05
GAS
C
TOC 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
1/24/05
GAS
I�
50
18,26 SF
' RIPARIAN j
____------- - BUFFER
----- -- X420-
22. ALL STORMWATER MANAGEME BAS!I•IS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM ------ X
1 T ' !
OFFSITE VIEWS. REFER TO DSCAPE PLAN ON SHEET 14 FOR / I ___1 \, ; S I \ �.' / r� - - _ -' ­ i
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1 j ce C .a EXISTING POND
' TO REMAIN �
23. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMP Y WITH NORTH CAROLINA STATE d 18,6 5 SF.'
BUILDING AND HANDICAPPED COD , VOLUME 1C. -ESEMENT/'3 - 3
- - - / -
�+
-
24. ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS SHALL B MAINTAINED BY THE HOA IN / 57 / h 264 -SF y
PERPETUITY,
215 SF -
25.
E I , , -
25. A DEVELOPER AGREEMENT SHALL BE EQUESTE, FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS
TO SR 1010. THIS REQUEST SHALL E SUBMITTED PRIOR TO BIDDING
THIS WORK.
21,626 SF •
26. LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN MEDIANS SHA BE MAINTAINED BY HOA IN PERPETUITY. '; / <;
t -------------J , ,16,043 -SF
27, CONNECTION TO WINDING OAK WAY TOT SOUTH SHALL NOT BE MADE _ -
UNTIL 50% OF THE CO'S FOR THIS PRO
T HAVE BEEN ISSUED, I �,00 - / / / , ; 13,797" SF ; /=�6SEi
28. SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENTS SHALL BE REC RDED ON PLAT AND KEPT 60 -
FREE OF OBSTRUCTIONS. THESE AREAS S - 0 BE CLEARED AND 2Z.- r MH
GRADED AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE THE RE IR SIGHT DISTANCE, 30' GREENWAY ZQ'sT N 5 R/W
_C{it�4M�N LiPi=1,F =EASENe
\ 12,861 SF
r ' Q � m.`
EASEMENT SPACE S 40 , 61 " /,
J
�j 54
h _
��� `, 14,05,SF 1 r iI
I - ,765'S� w
--
^ rE_-._.y c-� `��16,572�F �, a `x9o% cel{ 40 / •� _�
NOW OR FORMERLY /i �'• :,
WILLIAM C. JONES'
166; SF � r I
14,069
PIN #0760 01-48-3103
/ /�', ,./ - r
4J
-
DB 2905 PO 31 � I E -. -,/* . � �
"(�/ Te4lI SF'8 72
1
N n. 21,180 SF �\ • .!' k� S39 X:
31
38 16,,86 SR \ 414.
-,r
I U _
12,1 8 SF' 18,281 SFr
I
\ v, MH 0 �, 37 , _ - j, 1L' _ _._.1- `,% '27, B
\ ASEMENT `` O - - _�_ �, I of .j 52 / 1
' 23 s " _54'-- �11W >
12,106 SF a gg' - z' 81+ �'r---- ug' J I �' 14,(j00 SF
i._ 15,259 SF /
-•-----77 a'--/- ----1' ' V ----'J
ASEMENT�4, 74 SF`�i i 1�. i 14
8 70
r MH 1 52/ O i'^/ ,< p \ 15,493 ` SF.
\ \,, 13,142 SF '17,658�SF ,.
13,44U9E S /`,' \ ; 14,114PsSF
> �o
32 �
FUTURE SEWER L -.- - - - - g I a. 1 ;026 SF
CB I) 1 so
BY TOWN OF _ 12,403 SF,.,,, \ • -' �'! 3 _ _ Lt•-\ - -
r -- - - - C8 �9
J
CARY.--
:i
MH 33 1'136 SF
-F--- -- Q -' \ 5© r
25
I -T--
I_ \ S , \ 3i 50 R%W, 1�23� SF
13,16 F. i O 19,446. SF w� > __._ - 19 ---,
15,138 SF y
riY $s CB 3 -J a EA ENT . 4STaliw... ,o'x SOII 1 0Q
+ ._ - -. ._ - I 3 + SEMEN �_` -
MH 721
1
0 a
,�I 26 �
I r / I .y > w_ . - MH 3� 1 94,817 SF i�" i
14,426 SF\ ^. _ a✓e
i
I
ym CB 65
-
2 ,
\.E HENT
w
2 0' R/W
I i
a \28 0 I OI I 17,20
16,3 4' F '/ ' � 29 Q $
1 13,276 SF 14,137 SF^�'� �' I i 2,888'S ;'/ 15.293 SF SFS
----- -- _
MH 70 L.
- - z
YPE
�w\\\ \ : --
Is io L
N 89'12'59" W 813.87'
ST. MH
NTRANCE MONYM TS \ N 89.07'38" W 274.22'
+ bi
I I I
47 \ 48 . 49 / 52 53 . /
Designer
Scale
W&R
1 "=100'
Drawn By
Date
GAS
10/4/04
Checked By
Job No.
JEC
203141.1
WRENN MEADOW
SITE PLAN
NOW OR FORMERLY
CARY ALLIANCE CHURCH
PIN #0760,02-68-4403
MB 2001 PG 608
DB 8871 PG 04
*LOT 44 SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE
CUL-DE-SAC DUE TO THE SIGHT
DISTANCE EASEMENT.
A PORTION OF /
LES ARBRES /
MB 1984 PG 1245 /
l 1
/
/ ' 1
\ REZONING CONDITIONS
41,95 AC
7.89 AC.
0.438 AC.
0.134 AC.
R12 -CU
73
91
1.74 DU/AC
2,2 DU/AC
12,000 SF
12,106 SF
16,427 SF
80'
4,854 LF
1,161 LF
5,025 LF
4,695 LF
20,440 GPD
10,00 AC.
471,352 SF
20'
10'
25
0760,02-58-4553
1) SITE DENS1"LL NOT EXCEED 2.2 DU/AC.
2) NO MASS GRADING WILL TAKE PLACE IN AREAS WHERE THERE ARE EXISTING TREES,
3) THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE ACCESS FOR LOCAL
TRAFFIC BUT, AT THE SAME TIME, WILL BE DESIGNED TO DISCOURAGE CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC,
4) ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC WILL BE DIRECTED TO USE THE TEN TEN ROAD ENTRANCE
FOR CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WITHIN THE SITE.
GENERAL NOTES
A. SIGNAGE IS A SEPARATE APPROVAL PROCESS AND HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED
AS A PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. IF YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A UNIFORM SIGN
PLAN, YOU MUST SUBMIT AND OBTAIN APPROVAL OF A UNIFORM SIGN PLAN PRIOR TO THE
RELEASE OF PLATS FOR THE RECORDING OF LOTS (IF APPLICABLE). PLATS TO RECORD LOTS
CANNOT BE APPROVED UNTIL THE UNIFORM SIGN PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED.
B. WHERE EXISTING VEGETATION FAILS TO FUNCTION ADEQUATELY AS REQUIRED, (I.E. BUFFER
TYPE A
B C
AND 1 THOROUGHFARE B. 00 OROUGH ARE CORRIDOR BUFFER) THEI
CARY SITE INSPECTOR
RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS IN ADDITION TO THOSE
SHOWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.
C. ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL SITE WORK IS COMPLETED.
THE FENCING SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE FINAL SITE INSPECTION FOR THE CERTIFICATE
OF OCCUPANCY (CO),
D. ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITY EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH ON-SITE
ELECTRIC, CABLE, TELEPHONE, GAS OR OTHER SIMILAR UTILITY SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE
SIDE OF REAR YARD AREA OF THE SITE AND SCREENED, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, WITH
EVERGREEN PLANTINGS, PLANTINGS SHALL ALLOW FOR A MINIMUM OF A 5' CLEARANCE
AROUND THE STRUCTURE TO ALLOW FOR ACCESS. ADDITIONALLY, ANY SIDE OF THE
STRUCTURE HAVING A DOOR OR LOCK, THE PLANTINGS SHALL ALLOW FOR A 10' CLEARANCE.
THE AMOUNT OF CLEARANCE SHALL ACCOUNT FOR THE SIZE OF THE PLANT MATERIAL AT
MATURITY,
E. NO TREE SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN A ROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY OR WITHIN 5' OF A
SIDEWALK.
TREE SURVEY INFO
1, TREE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN ON SHEETS 2 & 3,
2. FORESTED AREAS ALONG EASTERN AND WESTERN BOUNDARY
LINE ARE COMPRISED OF LARGE PINES WITH SPORADIC HARDWOODS
AND UNDERSTORY VEGETATION. FORESTED AREA ALONG CREEK
AND OPEN SPACE IS A MIXTURE OF HARDWOODS, PINES AND
UNDERSTORY.
MINIMUM LOT LANDSCAPE
1, EXISTING VEGETATION WILL BE RETAINED WHENEVER
POSSIBLE.
2. AFTER DWELUNG CONSTRUCTION, EACH LOT SHALL
HAVE AS MINIMUM THE FOLLOWING PLANT TYPES AND
NUMBERS:
FOUNDATION PLANTINGS
FOUR LARGE SHRUBS (MATURE HEIGHT BETWEEN 6' & 10)
EIGHT SMALL SHRUBS (MATURE HEIGHT BETWEEN V & 6')
75X OF THE SHRUBS MUST BE IN THE FRONT YARD
25X OF THE SHRUBS MUST BE IN THE REAR YARD
-ONE LARGE TREE IN FRONT YARD AND ONE LARGER TREE
IN REAR YARD (MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 25' TALL AT MATURITY)
-ONE SMALL TREE IN FRONT YARD AND ONE SMALL TREE
IN REAR YARD (MUST RANGE BETWEEN 10' & 25' TALL AT MATURITY)
3. EXISTING VEGETATION THAT REMAINS ON THE LOT
SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COUNT OF MINIMUM LOT
LANDSCAPING,
4. NO LESS THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE MINIMUM
LANDSCAPING SHALL BE VISIBLE FROM THE FRONT
OF THE LOT.
5. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A CO FOR EACH LOT.
APPROVED
TOWN OF CARY
Approved by Date
Planning Date
Engineering Date
°oc�;;..0 ROl i •.
?°.�OFESS/pN9'�9
a SEAL 's
g °e
16269 °
e S
100 0 100 200
SCALE: 1 " = 100'
WITH ERS & RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com
Sheet No.
1

~v ~`v i' it I ~ i
` \l~./ ~ r ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I ~
GRAVEL & RIP RAP FILTER BASIN DESIGN ~ 31GN STORM DRAINAGE SUMMARY UTILITY NOTES
~ 1F;n~ ~ ~ I ~ BASIN DENUDED DRAINAGE BASIN DIMENSIONS WEIR VOLUME CLEANOUT VOI ~ ~ / # AREA AREA DEPTH LENGTH WIDTH LENGTH PROVIDED FRED REO CLEANOUT VOLUME SURFACE SURFACE Downsireom Rim (1) ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF CARP FRED REQUIRED AREA REQ.PRDVIDED UpstreamDownstrearben th Q Pre Q 10 Post Upstream Invdrtvert Elevatio6levation Slope STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS REVISED APRIL 15, 2004.
~ ~ ~ I (AC) (AC~ (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT~ (CF) (MONTHS Node Node (fi~ (cfs) (cfs} Size Elevation (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/ft (MONTHS) (CF) (SF) {SF) ) 2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CARE TO AVOID I R IN
~V , v I A 1,70 4:00 4 50 25 10 3,750 12 3 ~ / B 1.10 1.30 5 32 16 5 2 048 12 1 12 3,060 1,170 1,250 O D STU B G 12 1,980 380 512 CB 51 FE5 SD 127 2.4 4.0 15 inch 427.70 423.OD 434,40 D.D37D EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL DURING SEWER LINE CONSTRUCTION, ALL
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 20 0.80 1.50 4.5 30 15 5 1,575 12 1 12 1,a4D 439 45D SANITARY SEWER PIPE STREAM CROSSINGS AND DISTURBANCES SHALL BE
~ vI ~ 30 2.40 4.70 4 54 27 12 4 374 12 4 ~ V`~~, ~ ~ 40 1.60 1.80 5 38 19 6 2,888 12 2 12 4320 1 375 1458 CB 21 FES 2D 106 3.2 5.3 15 inch 432.60 424.50 438.00 O.D764 PROTECTED WITH 22" CLASS 1 RIP-RAP WITH FABRIC UNDERLINER. 12 2,880 527 722 CB 36 CB 35 40 3.4 5.6 15 inch 435.06 434.25 439.31 0.0203
I~C~ I \ 50 0.80 1.60 4.5 31 15.5 6 1,682 12 1, ~ i i ~ / \ 80 0.30 0.30 4.5 18 9 4 567 12 12 1,44D 468 481 CB 35 CB 31 141 5,2 8,6 15 inch 434.00 428.00 439,02 0.0426 (3) ALL MANHOLES LOCATED OUTSIDE OF PAVED AREAS SHALL 12 540 88 162 CB 33 CB 32 27 0.9 1.5 15 inch 425.00 424.80 x28.74 D.DD7a HAVE A RIM ELEVATION ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.
~ ~ i il~ A~~. 92 0.20 1.50 4.5 30 15 5 1,575 12 12 360 439 450 CB 32 CB 31 90 3,3 5.5 18 inch 424.60 424.25 428,74 O.D039
\ i /~'~y, ~ \ \ BMP ®FES 60 3.00 10.90 N A N A N A N A 13 500 12 5 ~ iii ~ 'w.~ \ ~ / \ ,{G~ i /r ~ - \ \ , 12 5,4DD 3,188 4 50D CB 34 CB 32 38 1.4 2.4 15 inch 425.10 424.80 429.59 0.0079 (4) WATER UNE SHALL BE 2' MINIMUM OFF EDGE OF CURB UNLESS SHOWN
/ ~ ~ NOTES 1' OF FREEBOARD IS PROVIDED FOR EACH BASIN CB 31 FES 30 170 9.8 16.3 24 inch 423.75 422.75 433.09 D.D059 OTHERWISE.
~ ~ \ / \ SB $92 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS TOC STD. DETAIL04000.05 CATCH BASIN RISER/FILTER CB 43 CB 42 27 2,5 4,2 15 inch 411.38 411.18 415.11 0,0074 (5) WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID AT LEAST 10 FEET LATERALLY MEASURED SIN RISER/FILTER CB 42 CB 41 156 3,4 5,6 15 inch 410.98 409.00 415.11 0.0127 EDGE TO EDGE FROM EXISTING OR PROPOSED SANITARY OR STORM
, ~ \ ~ \ SURFACE AREA IS BASED ON 1,500 SF/CFS FOR 10 1R-6 HR STORM ri i% ~ \ CB 41 FES 40 62 3.8 6,3 15 Inch 4D8.80 407.00 417.36 D.D243 SEWER UNLESS THE ELEVATIONS OF THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN
iii/ ~ A ~ IS AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER WITH A CB 73 CB 72 195 2.3 3.8 15 inch 427.98 424.11 431.71 0.0198 HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF AT LEAST 3 FEET.
i i/ ~ / ~ \ ' i~ ~RROPOSED ROAD x ~ , CB 72 CB 71 119 4.2 7.0 15 Inch 423.81 421.70 427.86 0.0177 CB 71 CB 70 163 5.7 9.4 18 Inch 421.42 417.80 425.46 0.0222 WHERE A WATER MAIN AND A SANITARY SEWER CROSS, AND THE
~ ~ i i~ .A l A 1 WID ~11NG PER , ~ ~ CB 70 CB 69 99 6.7 11.2 18 inch 417.60 416.00 421.88 0.0162 VERTICAL SEPARATION IS LESS THAN t8 INCHES OR THE WATER UNE
~ / o POWELZ~~TRACT ~ v , o y , \ \ OISSIPATOR DESIGN DR DESIGN CB 69 CB 68 27 8.4 14.0 24 inch 415.50 414.80 420.79 O.D259 PASSES UNDER THE SANITARY SEWER, THE SEWER MAIN SHALL BE CB 68 CB 62 75 11,4 19.0 24 inch 414.60 413.50 420,79 0.0147 DUCTILE IRON PIPE,
.l @ 1010 FAR. ~ CB 65 CB 64 27 0,6 1.0 15 inch 423.36 423.16 427.09 0.0074 i D, STREAM RIP RAP RIP RAP SIZE CB 64 CB 63 290 6.1 10.2 18 inch 422.50 418.43 426.98 0.0140 ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE.
~ ~ ~ , WINbJAM ~ . ` \ , OUTLET ~ PIPE DIA, V10 APRON OUTLET D: STREAM RIP LENGTH WIDTH WIDTH THIC w1DTH THICKNESS CLASS d50 CB 67 CB 66 109 2.2 3.6 15 inch 433.86 426.98 437.61 0.0631
' ~ it it DEVELOPMENT, ~v ` \ ~ INCHES FT SEC FEET FEET FEET IN( ii ~ . ~ ~ )t / )t ) ~ ) ~ ) ~ I (FEET) (INCHES) (INCHES) CB 66 CB 64 96 3,4 5.6 15 inch 426,78 423.16 430.71 0.0377 6 ALL WATER SERVICES SHALL BE 3 4" TYPE K COPPER AND ALL SEWER CB 63 CB 62 110 7,9 13.2 18 Inch 418.23 415.50 423.16 O.D248 O /
~ ~ I I ~ O V ~ FES 2D 15 12.7 7.5 4 12 II I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 00 \ \ FES 3D 24 6.3 12 6 18 i i it I NOW OR FORMERLY \ ~ / FES X40 15 9.3 7.5 4 12 12 22 B 6 CB 62 DI 61 116 19.9 33.2 24 inch 412.30 408.D0 421.28 0.6393 SERVICES SHALL BE 4 SCHEDULE 40 PVC UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, 18 22 B 6 DI 61 FES 60 93 19.8 33.0 30 inch 407,50 406.00 411,75 0,0161
12 22 B 6 (7) CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
iii I ~ \ ~ ~ A FES tY50 15 9:0 7,5 4 12 ~ ' I ~ ~ h V A~~ FES y60 30 10.5 15 7.5 15 I JOHN A POWELL v / 12 22 B 6 DI 92 CB 91 25 3.0 5.1 15 Inch 440.20 440.00 445.OD O.OD80 TO CONSTRUCTION, LOCATION OF EXISI1NG UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANS 15 22 B 6 CB 91 Ex PE 18" 24 3.0 5.1 18 inch 439.74 439.00 0443.20 0.0098 IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION BUT CAN BE CONSIDERED
i i II II / ~ \ ~ ~ FES 80 18 7,0 9 4.5 13.5 I I ~ I CONCRETE PIPE # 13.5 22 B 6 ONLY AS APPROXIMATE,
II II PIN 0761.03-40-7899 A ~ ,A / i i I i / \ . ~ ALL DISSIPATORS SHALL HAVE FABRIC UNDERLINERS. I ~ I ~ \ ~ COLLAR IF ~~.I I / A?., v~~ v J tLINERS. EX PE 18" CB 81 20 1.1 1.9 18 inch 448.42 447.68 449.81 0.0366 8 BENCHMARK IS RIM OF EXISTING MANHOLE AT THE TOWN OF ARY CB 81 FES 80 40 1.1 1.9 18 inch 447.40 446.50 ?454.10 0.0225 O C
II I; DB 9143 PG 1283 ~ ><o ~ ` ~ NEEDED. / iii I / l` ~ H- s \ \ o ~ , SEWER INTERCEPTOR, ELEV, IS 399,56
i I II I ~ / ~ Q V , iil I / I W S \ ~ I ~7T 1 / , (9) TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND RIPARIAN BUFFER LOCATION FROM
i i I I ( ~ ~ / I ~ ~ 'l~/ ~ \ ~ / i ~~II II / ~ 0 F~ -ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT TOWN OF CARY SURVEY BY WITHERS & RAVENEL. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS
ail ? I ~ \ V A A~ II II ~I ~ I NI OS qA ~ \ \ I -RIM ELEVATION GIVEN FOR CB IS TOP OF CURB AND FOR DI IS TOP OF GRATE (10) WHERE THE STATIC WATER PRESSURE IS IN EXCESS OF 80 PSI, A
I , ~ . ~ , , w . F ~ ~ 5 STRIP OFF RED TO A w ~ -ALL PIPE IS TYPE III RCP UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE SHALL BE PROVIDED INSIDE THE BUILDING -DI IS NCDOT STD. 840.14 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLUMBING CODE,
~z ~r / Q ~ BF 0 ~ . \ ~ BE DEDICA TED A P I R W ; ~ ~ I w I o . ~ ~ UBL C ~r \y, 1 w A M \ \ , I INDICATES Q25
- Q I ~ o \ 2000 PG 1082 INDICATES 0-RING GASKETED RCP (11) SANITARY SEWER MAINS INSTALLED WITH A DEPTH OF COVER OF 14 FEET -0 VERIFY RIM AS PART OF SURVEY STAKEOUT TO 20 FEET SHALL REQUIRE SPECIAL BEDDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH
I I r~ I ~ z. ~ v es 11 w ~ TOC S 040 0.04 \ ~ \ .p,~ s, CARY STANDARD 07000.13. SEWER SERVICES INSTALLED WITH A DEPTH OF
N I, .I 2 = = = - = 4 ~ `f~Q, REM IN ~ \ ~ F - , COVER OF 8 FEET TO 14 FEET SHALL REQUIRE CLASS I BEDDING FROM 4" BELOW THE SERVICE TO 4" INCHES OVER THE SERVICE LINE.
- - - - - \ , , ~ ~ STORM. AINAG \ 4x SEWER MAINS AND SERVICES INSTALLED WITH A DEPTH OF COVER OVER 14 FEET SHALL REQUIRE DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR THE ENTIRE RUN
/ ~ O I o I ; EXTENDir AND THE ~ \ BETWEEN MANHOLES OR CLEANOUTS.
I = ~ ~ ~ ' TOC STD. 4C~D9 05 ,e~F ~ RYE ~ \ (12) MINIMUM SLOPE FOR FOUR INCH SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE
I ~ I ~J I . TO BE CAN TRUCE ~ 445 ~ I ~ I ' AT DI92. N' ~ 1.09a CLEANOUTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS
I 1 m ~ o SEDIMENT , t ~S \ . \ BUT SHALL BE SPACED AT NO GREATER THAN 75 LF FOR 4" \ SERVICES. ALL CLEANOUTS SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES
I t II , I 'I w I ~ , BA`SJfV #92 A..I ~ xoo ~ F I I ~ ~ \ ABOVE FINISH GRADE OR MEET THE OPTIONAL CLEANOUT REQUIREMENT
I ~ I 1 ~ ~ e~ PHE A 3 t ` ~ 1 l I ~ I i ~ t~t ~Ib' x[ A i ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ \ METHODS AS SPECIFIED IN CARY STANDARD 07000.10. CLEANOUTS LOCATED I~ - \ IN PAVED AREAS MUST HAVE CAST IRON RISERS FITTINGS & BRASS CAPS,
I 1 I ~ t a. ~ ST ~ A' , \ ' \ (13) THERE IS NO FEMA MAPPED FLOOD PLAIN LOCATED ON THIS PROJECT PER FIRM
I I I 7 t , F ~ EC - \ F r~r \ MAPS 3718300515 E, BOTH DATED MARCH 3, 1992.
1 ~ ~ -r C \ 45 ~ I ,C Flu 1 ~ _r~~A tt 15 8 , ,e ~x ,6 , \ (14) TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR
I L~ y_, ~ ~ 24,66 SF i •o~ ~ X-0 A ~ v o 0 ~ i c, C \ TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT. FENCING SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED \ ADJACENT TO AREAS WITHOUT WOODED VEGETATION,
i SURVEYO T
\ \ ~ Ci ~ A J r (15) BLOWOFF ASSEMBLIES IN TRAFFIC AREAS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER TOWN OF CARY TRAFFIC AREA REQUIREMENTS.
~s ` i LOW P I GAF ~ ' ~ p I I . o ~ ~ zs \ \ ` C
I ~s`:, 14 923.- $QAD~GV ~ ~ `;A ~ qt (16) THE TOWN OF CARY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS WERE REVISED / 4/15/04, CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THESE SPECIFICATIONS.
f i S i ~ i ~ \ \ I
~ LIMITS . ~ ~ 2 o I ~ $ \ ~ \ ~ / I I, \ CODS ~}CTION ~ ~ ~ 24 x12 TAPPING
~ , I ~ i'' 4 s, \ t ~ , I i ~ ~ \ \ f ~ SLEEVE & VALVE ~F 40 LF 20" CASING
w'r, ~ MH ~ i S \,,1, exoo \ ~ I, _ 8,911 SF T ~ , PIPE TO BE BORED
~ ~ FF xF s~, x~ / < 18,100 SF a. NO Fp \ ~ ' I AND JACKED '
i A PORTION F ? I~ 2 B~owO ~ ;-9k ~ s ~ ~ I 0 Q ~ C ~ c Q s ' F ~ ~ L F i
I R NA I ~I ~ ~ - \ e ~ ~ ~ v G E DER ""5 / \ ~ , _ O I .tP ~ / 1 ~ , - TOWN OF GARY PLANNING DEPT. RE UIRED NOTES Q
~ w I I ~ ~ R ~ oo \ MB 2001 PG 760 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~6, M F~ \ ~ ` , 00 a 1. TO MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO E E ~ XISTING TREES NEAR THE INTERIOR EDGE OF BUFFERS
AND STREETSCAPES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CUT MINIMUM 2' TRENCHES ALONG
I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? 6' \ 9 r r--- C ~ THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SO AS TO CUT BATH R 6' ~ ~ ~ E THAN TEAR ROOTS. F
I Q~ ~ ~y. ~ 18,425 SF ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ , V o° ~ ~ VEL \ ~ ~ 2. THE TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE UNTIL AL IT
I I , 6-~~ ~ X~ ~ ~2 , . 33. ~ - ~ CON UCT~N I ,S 4,836 SF ; ~ - L S E y ~ ~ - ~ ~ WORK IS COMPLETED AND THE FINAL SITE INSPECTION IS SCHEDULED. THE
z . ' ~ tt _ ~ ~EN,TRAt~C ~ Q r~A ; ~ ~ ~ ,t 4 SEWER,SER E ~ ~ 10 ~ ~ FENCING SHAL ~ r. ~ ~ L BE REMOVED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION,
~CIMIT~ F I o, ~ ; ~ W/GLE~t "~TYP) ,
' i r TR CTION ' 1 m I ~ ~ , ~ ' >a; _ ~ ~ A~_
~ 13,849 SF r ~ ~ ' \ I w ~ , N i i \ \ - , 0 ~ i , "o ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , J8 ~ A,
, ` E 6~' V ~ ~ 9 01~2~, _ ~ . ~ \ ~R 0 ~
v Ir 1 ,~A k 445 i ~ FENCE SALT _ sr~ ; , D \ a FFr~ ~~~9 A £
O r, / r N I i i vrCE ~ - ~ - 22,,335 r, ^h of ~ FENCE N~ C ,o~ C qp 1 s e _ ~ ~ \
\ I / , , t 19,6.43. 't~ TS OF , \ ~ ~ ~ J,TS OF ~ /6 OFF - ~ \ ~ F ,ER-- ~ ,?3x ~ \
s \ I ,18,12 SF ~ 1 ,DAYLIGHT O \ °x ~ e•°,° ~ CON~3UCTION oo ~ N UCTION ~ M ~ - _ > EXISTrNG \
°0 \ I I ; a ~ ~ 11 ~ LINE (TYP) ~ FILLS \ ~ \ I ~ , , ~ / ~I HYDRANT ~ v ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ \
~7 \ 4 ~ V ~ i i o STORM / AREA ~ r ~ - e \ v - - F ~ e' ~ • v merit ron.a ~ ~ r' ~ ~ ~ ~kS~T _ ~ , . , C t ~ t u i ~ ~ r/~ I l 'mil i , ~ r fi0 OCATEDFES~~: CONCRETE PIPE v
R , 2g2\\ ~ _ I ~ME B 5 E i ~ ~ 14,221 SF \ r I l V ~ lx p~ ~ •9. AY[ r ~ ~ewne e ~ ~ ~ f ~ + . ~ COLLAR, IF \ ~ ~ ' , ~ ~ \ N . ~a~ ,NEEDED. ~ ~ ~ ~ v
- - - I \ A ~ - ~ ~ r ~ ,
B 4. ~ +~7 C ,i ~ ~ , ~ 18;168 SF ri°E ~e wvw I / ~ ~ gASMV , , v ~ ~ , ~r i ti ~ ~ - ~
~ \ ~ . NE ' .;.Y~ X440 + 5 C r 12 X8 CROSS ~ , J S 9 36. ~ _ _ ~ ~ 12 x6 REDUCES/ , ass ; _ 72 , , w \ \ ~ sxo
~ ~ Ao ~ AQ 8'•x4" REDUCER E~ '
1, ~ - , ~ -0k ws ..os,, 1-2 GV ,r i 450- , ~ ~ ,i 15,958 ~ ~ \ ~ v . r-- /450- ~ i ~ i 0.' \ ~ A
o ~ TORM F , . ~ ~ ,I WI ~ 'r,
GRAVEL ~ . °tio , \~MEi 34 EASEME 8.X4 TE W ' ~ i CONSTRUCTI(Aq CB ; - ~1 ~ I ~ 2s~
` - ~ ~ _ , " ENTRANCE ~ ( ~ ~ o - _ ~ z ~ ~6,D94 ~SF~ ~ ~ ~
NI I' ~L~. _ [ ' - - -
I°'a"""~1HCE ~ ~ ,1 435 ~ q / ~ ~ q r Lx M ~ \ ~
c I ~.eEP'p°~Ai[P nK~ ~ ~ a IP\. L.. L - j. I. ~ , n` t~~ i. .DIY nru 4- ~ R - ~ ~ ~ - - / ~ r r r ~ ~ 4 ~ - ~ ~ \
A PORTION OF w I ~ ~ , ~ ~;Ilj _ ~ s, I~ p x, . ~ ~ 408 F 6:5 ~ - S~ _ - - - , LEVEL SPREADER DESIGN ` ~ ~ ~ ~ a
GRENA~~ER ~ w ~ - ° ~ p~ 14,985 SF I ~ Ns . •I ~ I ~ 5 9 ~ ~ ,L IT'S o~ - sg. ,03~ ~ r ~ p~ ~ , ~ 6utlei 610 (cfs) Length (LF~erm Elev. ~ ~ ti
CR©ss. ~ ~ Q I I ,t ~ \ , ~ ~ q3o r 1 , ~ w MB 2001 PG 1575 _ 6~ ~ _ - , ~o STRUCTION ~ 4,443 . w - ~ ~o _ ~ I 2D 5.3 69 423 ~ ~y-xr~
C _ _ ~ ~a ~ i „(T ,~F ~ ~ 30 16.3 212 422.75 ~ti S _ ,
Q I 6--REDU~Ef~- - ~ A ~ ; STOR ~ i i r - SEDIMENT ~ - ~ - 4 007 SF EVENT z FIRE H RANT ~ / i~ ~ \ 40 6.3 82 407 i ~EV_v ~ ~ q \
E . w ~ h- ~ e•seE~r LEVEL ~ ~ ~ ~ - i~SSY• 'P EIMITS ••o,• .•p~ , ~e• - ~ 50 4 52 423 ~
~ Q W' PNE o,a"svar a ~ ' _ ~ ST RM SPR~A~~R ~ 1 ~ r i V I (J I M ~ ;fie eoe~a ~ , , ; , ~ Cb S7R CTIOTd- , ~ i gae vane fi ~ i AS E
• N a 14,~J't J,'~ i ~ \ ~ .'I 1 F.... \
. 32 . o~~ I e• rwle vxE wE l i 1 0 4 J F r i m• auc ~ ~ • • ~f I 9C9"..i. 1d / - ~ t i IY/ , a^ a.T ? ~ / ~ J t 21~- ~ , ~ - ~PpPUA ~ ~ ,MBAR
~ / / ~ I : ; ~ I 18 006 SF r~ 67 , h 1~5 _ i V I ~ \ rso - I V - ~ i \
° i , m i ao'nK ~ ~ / - ~ ~ ~ i r y 0 DITCH ~ - ~ w POPLM ~
~~,a O w I f~„~------- - - BERM A N ~ , 3 °~SF i ~A." ~Q "'y S EEDED TO D~{.y~OT 1 ~ , ; ~ o / 204 ~ ~1 ~ \ ~ r r ~7R~. Y ~ \J J I I Q ~ ~ V ]a wkly ~ N
,Tat aaE, i 'eYt.IyARE i ~/-i.., Z e•o!Y4 - / STORIv1 RUNQFF~4-~~#30 , m•ei~ 1 ~ ~ I r
• h to via ~ ~ ~ i ' ~ V ' , - 6$ ~ ~i ~ I _1-~, X01 Sf - EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
'i° ~°xt Q 'i, ~ I ~ . ~ a... t e wx ~ -h . • ~
e I ~I•YAe~ b i- ~ ~2~8 6 SF t / / I_. ~ - - 1, 111100110110011 8 6 SF . 0 0 25, ~ 51' - RIP RAP FILTER BASIN N CAR eeo
I I \ 0~ ar- - FE.2-.emu ~ _ e/~ .Ne•N. O~~ °•I a ~ - \ I eea ~ es•°e G~S~ tie O,r o°o
~ro~~ 650 SF ~ - / t ~ _ sreRM - ~ SILT FENCE
I ~i ~ ~ LIMIfiS 01= ~ i ~ ~ . A gqr EASEMEMT I I / _ I I ~ - ~ 3, _ - t C~I~ISTRk1~Ta>0~ - ~ ~ 3 Q~ 9~ ~
~ ~ ~ _ I`-" ~ - ~ ~ _ , - - I _ ~ 1 - - _ 'm" ~11APlE - . _ 0- `ion NT TLANDS~ i e SEAL ~ e - f DIVERSION DITCH/BERN S e a
, v SIN f APPROVED 16269 4 EL - - ~ CHECK DAM v eee e°
_ - SPREAQE - l TOWN OF CARY .9 Se SPREA ER ~ ~N,..••~~~ . D FS F
' CO ~TRUCTION I _ yi a/ E, CP ~ i j ~ wETUwDS Approved by Date °°'~a....e..1a•'
I'Tj. / 14- 1 planning Date 60 0 60 120 -TP- TREE PROTECTION FENCING Engineering Date
18,26 SF I I SCALE: 1 = 60
No, Revision Date B Designer Scale
A TOC 1st REVIEW COMMENTS 11/22/04 GAS W&R 1°=60'
8 TOC 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 1 03 05 GAS Drawn By Date WATER, SAN IT SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAINAGE WITHERS RAVENEL Sheet No.
C TOC 3rd REVIEW AND NCDOT COMMENTS 1 24 05 GAS GAS 10/4/04 WRENN MEADOW
Checked By Job No. AND EF
JAB 203141.1 ND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com

~ 33 .102'" , - - ~ 8~ STORM DRAINAGE NOTES
~ ~ / I , _ , _ , ~J = EROSION CONTROL - \ ~ , ' ~ _ ' 1 ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF CARY O
- LIf~IITS OF _ - C N~TRUCTION . _ _ - - ~ ~ _ , STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS REVISED APRIL 15, 2004.
_ y l - ~ (2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CARE TO AVOID DISTURBING
o - I ~ _ _ N EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL DURING SEWER LINE CONSTRUCTION. ALL F--: kt SANITARY SEWER PIPE STREAM CROSSINGS AND DISTURBANCES SHALL BE
~ I ~ = PROTECTED WITH 22" CLASS 1 RIP-RAP WITH FABRIC UNDERLINER.
T. 5 `+9~ ~d I ~ \ i _ ~ ~ (3) CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES
1'8, 26 SF ~ DURING THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT. (4) CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DIVERSION DITCHES AS NECESSARY TO
i ~ ~ ~ ~ EXISTING POND f I 50' ENSURE ALL SEDIMENT IS DIRECTED INTO ERDSIDN CONTROL MEASURES. ~ ~ ~ I
' ~ - _ - ~ I TO REMAIN COMBINATION TREE , - I I , - _ ( ~ ' ! ~ (5) ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL BE PROTECTED PER TOC STD. 04000.14 UNLESS
I T + 1 ~ PROTEC ION AND .-42~ I ~ NOTED OTHERWISE. ~ I ~ ~ I a,
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! SILT FENCE AT TOE - ~ ' ~ ~ NTRA TOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR
" ~ ~ ~ ~ OF ROADWAY FILL ~ U ~ i ~ ~ ~ C ~ TO CONSTRUCTION. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N T AN E CONSIDERED ~ #5Q , IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATIO BU C 8
1 B I SLOPE. / LOTS 18 AND 19 MAY REQUIRE ' ~2 I - ~ ONLY AS APPROXIMATE. - LEA ! W ~ I ~ - ~ ~ i I
INDI IDUA I~. ~ ~ 'H ~s ~ ~ i . V L GRINDER PUMPS TO w ~ lr ~ ~ , SP.R~ ) i (7) BENCHMARK IS RIM OF EXISTING MANHOLE AT THE TOWN OF CARY
SERVE THEM. ~ 18,6 5 SF.-' - , REFER TO SHEETS D1 D8 ~ m ° ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 . 1'~ FOR DAM IMPROVEMENTS, Q ~ ~ + ~ SEWER INTERCEPTOR. ELEV. IS 339.56 ~ ~ fASEMF ~T w / ~ ~6 ' '
i i i / ~ ~ ~ \ ~ DESIGN & SEQUENCE ~ f ~ / Md a" (e) TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATIDN AND RIPARIAN BUFFER LOCATION FROM . - ~ ~ , SURVEY BY WITHERS & RAVENEL.
~ ti0 ~ 43 i y1~ 2~-, X40 -SF ~ 57 ~o ~ / _ , ~ ~ (9) CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR FOR PIPE AND CONSTRUCT PIPE.
\ ~ ` ' INFORMATION, i 2 w - , ,v ~ , ~ 1 i, f / - - ~6 ~ CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE AND SEDEMENT BASINS AT PIPE z' ~ VI ' ~ _ / N ENDS AND DIVERSION DITCHES AND THEN BEGIN GRADING ROADWAYS.
, ~ 17,215 SF ~ ~ I ~
~f ~ 1! / ~ (10) IF STORM CROSS DRAINAGE CAN NOT BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO GRADING, 1 ~ ~ P tip' fat/ s ~ ~ TOC STD. 040000.11 SHALL BE USED TO CROSS WET WEATHER CHANNELS.
' - 1 ~ 19 ~ , / ' ~ ~ a , k ,r f ~ ~ ~ I (11) CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE GRADING OPERATION IS CONDUCTED IN A
~ ` ~ ! ~ ' MANNER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW ANY SEDIMENT INTO CREEKS OR PONDS. ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ NOW OR FORMERLY
v ~ I ! . i / ~ ~ , 21,6-2.6 SF ~ i ~ / ~ 1 I ~ (12) STORM WATER DISCHARGES INTO CAMP BRANCH, TRIBUTARY OF MIDDLE C EE ~ \ I- CARP ALLIANCE CHU H /e.. Ai
Q i ~58 < ~ I ~ ~ ~ (13) ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPE SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION
~ , ~ SEDIMENT ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ r , ~ ! ' ~ PIN ~~~~~~~-~~-4403 IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOC STD. DETAIL 04000.12. , ' ~ 55 ~ ' ! I~~'
~ ~ ~ ~ BASIN 'B' ` ' ~ ~ , ~ / i - ~ ~ ~ / ~ 59 ~ - , ,-1 043~F~ 6 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i MU 2OO 1 PG 6O8 14 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RIP RAP LINED TAIL DITCHS AT THE STORM X43 /J ~ © ~r I ' R P ITIVE
~ / o ~ ? ' / _ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ „ a- ~ _ ~ 4 DRAINAGE PIPE DISCHARGE POINTS AS REQUIRED TO ENSUE OS - ~ ~ ~ ~ , DB 8871 PG 0 DRAINAGE. i ' ~ I. 296 S ,
~ ~ , ~ ~ / 1.3,77 SF-~ , ' ' ~ (15} SEDIMENT BASINS SHALL BE KEPT OUT OF WETLAND AREAS.
I ~ - ~ r ; {i6} THERE IS NO FEMA MAPPED FLOOD PLAIN LOCATED ON THIS PROJECT PER FIRM
"I ~ ~ G I ~ ~ ~l ~ ~j~ ~ ~ ~ y~ ~ _ `~Y r~ / ~ ~ ' ` I MAP 37183C0515E DATED MARCH 3, 1992.
MH Z ' ,~O ' 1 y~ i~ p. ]4~,~~' Irrecrcw (17) A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THIS CONSTRUCTION, :7 f
} 30 GREENWAY , wET~AN~s - wET~aNOS , ~ ~ a ~ ~y ; `I ~ , 5~D ME '~'~TO M ~ , .12,861 S~ EASEMENT "$EGI~~ Ol~t$I ATl(1Gd . a~.~ x3 oa .."s (18) PERMANENT GROUND COVER SHALL BE ESTABLISHED EITHER IN 15 WORKING - ~ " 4" DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS, WHICHEVER IS SHORTER, PER TOWN OF CARY
i~" ~ - - -BASIN 40i~ eA EMEN o, TPJSILT FE ~ - ~ ,gig 2 REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE.
I ; ao ~ ~p 61 LIMI s,oF E ~ '°If 30' ZON ,a k gTf~UCTI 4xp ,4~~ V V firer q~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 54 i I {19) TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR
t o ~ C~I ~ ~ I, ~ o y, ~ ~ ~ ~ 1405 SF , 8 ~ GV' i ; TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT FENCING SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED F 0 ~ / ip ' a , ~ ~ 'i' ~I ADJACENT TO AREAS WITHOUT WOODED VEGETATION.
~ , i ~ 1. ' 20 zON~, ~ ~ . , , N~ I I _ _ _ _ ~ ° ' (20) THE TOWN OF CARP STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS WERE REVISED _ 16,765 ~PI
} „ z, n„~, 4/15/04, CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE ALL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED IN ~~LIMITS ~F ''0i` ACCORDANCE WITH THESE SPECIFICATIONS. REFER TO REVISED CARY DETAILS C'~, ~ + ~ ~ caun
4~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ a~ d~ ~ONSTRU~ N AT H ASIN HOODS SHALL BE STAMPED "DRAINS TO RIVER" ~ 1~ i ; (21) ALL C C B
_ ' i SPREADER ,.16;5725 , qrtrt i WITH 3/4° HIGH LETTERING tV ~
/i'/ _ _ - ~ 1' - ~ > \ ~ ~ 1x2 l ~ - - ~ o ~ ~ (22) ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT ~ i ~e vooyw ~ I ~ ( is vdtra
NOW OR FORMERLY o ~ ~ ,~k° ~ , 16 766- SF - - / ~ ,LI I'FS~O ~ ~ t c~ - GROUND COVER WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS, 66 SF ~ ~ ~ ~ P 1 WHICHEVER IS SHORTER. 1~, NOR'!
JONES ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ 'TRUCTaON l ~ ~a ~ p WILLIAM C. i, . ) U 1 I ~ K / + ~ ~ ' "i°'~ I,' 23 ALL STREETS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT SHALL BE KEEP CLEAN AT
~ 1~~ ~ (~1yy i ' ~ ~ ,'I { )ALL TIMES OR A WASH STATION WILL BE REQUIRED. ~ Al i
- - \ ~.~.,-14,069- a ~,6~ PIN 0 760.01 48 3103 ~ ~ " ~ oo ~ ~ k , / ~ ~o a, , / ~ " 0 ~ ~ I ~ I M 1 A L RE UIREMENTS RELATIVE TO BEST MANAGEMENT 0 v r 24 THE PROJECT EE S L Q I (7 y~
2905 PG 31 ~ t i E E' 8x8' TE ~ ~ 26 ~ 1 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 41- Q 1 1 S6 ~ I ( )PRACTICES AND ENGINEERED STORMWATER CONTROL STRUCTURES A5 ' ~ Olp9+g1 ~ +sR~ i OUTLINED IN THE TOWN OF GARY UNIFlED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
/ ~ ''32 [ ~ ~I 1 . i ~ 2 ~ ~ GV z= i i ro i I CHAPTER 10, PART 3.
~ ~ 2,,180 SE . ~ s~ ~ 39 ~ ~ ~ ~b ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~dH 31 , 14 (25) RISER STRUCTURES MUST BE ON SITE BEFORE GRADING PERMIT IS ISSUED.
i ~ i~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ , 41 1 ~ ~j& ) ~ ~ ,~gk 1 i \ i - 41 - ~ J~ _ _ _ _ {26) WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS.
~ ~ ~ . , ' ~ e~ oAYU. T, 16,869 / 1 ~ Yi q, Q ~ c~' ~i {27) EACH LOT SHALL BE CLEARED INDIVIDUALLY, IF MULTIPLE LOTS ARE
INE lT B 1\ ; ~ s• 18 281 / L 1217f8 SF , ~ , ~ n; '7 ~ ~ I 18,251 SF , ) Ji / i CLEARED SIMULTANEOUSLY AND THE REVISED AREA IS GREATER THAN i ! i I 12,000 SF, AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
' i' /p~ c' i ~ ~ N M 0 _ , _ ~ ~ ~ 37 LIMITS 0 ` LIMITS OF! ! o I ! TOWN OF CARY FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, I ~ a 'S2
r' ~ ~ ' ~ o ` ~ ~`~_CONS1`Rl , f ~ ~,T RM ~ ~ ~ _ `i _ CONS~`RUCTION , - _ _ _ _ _ _ , ~ ~ (28) DENUDED AREA = 10.0 ACRES
23 '~~aSEMENr ` g1' _ 30' 129 / ~ ~ / ~ 12,106 SF ~ 69' _ 24' _ 129' ~ I ' -_L_, ' ~ 14, 00 SF
/ ~ 15,259 SI ~ ~ , .7`
~ _ ~ - EASEMENT , ~ ~ ~ i 14,, ~ ~ 4 74 SF ~ / ~ ~j ! u - 140' J '1
r~ n ~ 4 - , ~ ~ ~ ~ y / ~ , , i G ~ ' N ~'1R- R- ~ I 4~ ' ' + VALVE AND ~ -
i ~ ` ' ~ ~ oi+~= ~ ~-'MANH LE i ~ i
o" . s. ~ 31 , ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 5ti, , ; ~ ~ p ~ 15,493 15,493 SF i I ~
, N I A ~ SILT ~ zs a4 s ~ ~ o'', 13,142 SF ' ~ ~I 1 i 1 f I
o , ~ ~ , 7: \ `i PROPOSED FUTURE , ~ , A ~ ~ FfNC ; ° ~ ~ ~ ! ; ~ 7, 65 SF ~ I I 1 I r I I
SEWER LINE BY ~ o ~ ~ ~ F - , ~ ' 1 I 14,114~~, SF~ r.y~'' ~ ~ Lr
~ 35 TOWN OF CARY 11 _ ~ ~ ' " ~ sv ~ ~ ~ 32 ~ ~ . F , N i \ ~ ' , Mn I ' ~,I i
/ _ I ~ ~ i ~ ,n i j. ~I ~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ • ~ ~ ~ 6LOWOFF _ I 7 - 147, ~
T 2s+33. 1 1 ',026~SF ~ T 1a~~o' ; 12,403 SF~ AS TYP _ ~ ~r~ ~ 43 43 r _ j i - _
rµ _ ~ 3 p9 i I ; ~ ''g5 , i ~
- 14,136 'SF i • j - - - - - - - - - - ,136 SF,i ~ I
~ ~ ~ Q - ` x , -F----- - - MH 3 x ~ ~ I 50 ~ I
,o I ~ ~ ~ , a ~ t , ~ i 1 I \ j ' ~ I ;
; ~ ~ ~ 3 3 ~ , ~ / ~ ~ ~ ! I Q ~ ~7 234 SF I ~
1 16 0',7 S F + ~ n~~n ~ i I
Q ~ o P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~H b ~ ~ o _ /
N E ~ ~ ~ 33 ~ _ - ~ y, ~ ~ ~ F o I. .13,16 `~F, ~ 19, 446. S ~ ; 8 ~ - - I
I ~ ~ 2 ,LIMIT OFD s . ~ ~ ~ ~ z' ;CON TRUCTIO ~ F -o- _ / 4 I°
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5,138 SF ~ a • - ' I ,12 ~ i ~ pp ~ N RM , ~ ~ - -~43 STORM d S0 II ~ / ~ ~ _ I~
.%",i I x CB ~ EA EM~NT ~ I + EASEM~^'T - _ ~ o ~ ~ ± ~ r~ 60 , ~ i ti ~o ~ ~0 , ~ ~Sr. . ~ , ~ I ~
,q °s , ~ I • ~ _ ~ A PORTION CF
~ ~ 01 - o ~ ' DRY DETENTION BASIN MH~, ~ P I ~ i~ ; ~ ~ d 6~ I \ /
0 - 1 SHALL ALSO FUNCTION ~ I ~ ~ oa+zz i ~ - • ~MH~z ~ 17 sF ; L ~ ARBRES ~ ~ 148 DES + /
AS EROSION CONTROL I ~ I \ g ~ ~ r 1 9. ~ - Oo+~ 7 08 d~ N '0 W ~ + ~ ,-f - MB 1984 PG 1245 / ~ ' /
I DEVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION I ~ 14,.426 SF MH , , - I ~ 36 79' o " CB ''65 ~ ~ ~ ' r .4¢s ~ ~ ~
~ / ' / ;.I ~ /
i 1 \ i~ , ~ ,';~a LLMIT~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 LIMITS OF, I~ _ ~ 'sroRM ~ _ FIRE HYDRANT ' ~ a. SITS OF; ; ` ~ ?z~' ,:,;,1 ~ ~ /
LIMITS OF ~,o Z \ Q. EMENr~ CONSTR~J IQN~--------- - . Q ~ ~ GONSTRU~CT N ~N ,;I w E ~ ASSY~TY~ ~ _1 ~~eROSS ~ ~ ~ ~ N I, O )NSTRU~CT ~J ~ ~ _ _ ~
~ ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i -1 ~ i - ~ n „ i ~ r. M ~ ~ l 1 x4 ~REDUC~ I ~ ~ / ~I O
~Iw 2 ~ TEMPQRq~'Y SEDIMENT ~ J „ ~ i 4 , , M ~ Y 218 V ~ ; ~ II. I /
{ ! BASF ,UNTIL - ~ ~ ~ Q ~ 4 V ~ . ~ , ~ I~ IN ~ ~ ~ 28 A I 29 ~ N 4 ~ ~ ; j ~ ~ ~ / - a ~ 48 _ ~ j ; \ I
16 8 4 F ; ~ ~ STREW, ~,RE ~ 5 ; M , W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 17,20 S~ , I ~ lo, STABIL1 Eb ~ ~ ~ ~ % j ~ I I I
a~ I~ ,I~ ~ 13 276 SF ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ; ~ ~ 14,1. ~ ~ 2 888 SF ~ - G ~I !II
I' ~ I , ! ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.. ~ I ~ o / ~ ; , ~ 15, 2 9 3 ~F 'I 'I
MH t I I ~ ~ s ~ _ 1, C-~--'-- --J L._.-,------'-.--'.---~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i. L ~ i I 4 i~ i I ' i _ I
r , ~ P - - - J .
MH 10 2 TY E B ND CAPE AREA EASE ® ~ ~ - 2t3' T 'B', AN L 'B~`;LANDSGAPE AR A E NT 91' - - r0 ,
- ~o~ ~ ~ ~ N 89 12 59 W 81.3.87 ;~,d I ~ -~~i o
'-`fix ; TIE TO ~f~ ~ GRAVEL .I I• ~ ~ XIST. MH ~ , _ ~ ~ ~ ~ / N 89 07 38 W 214.22 / t,.
\ EXIST, MH CONSTR Cth~J I, O ~ ~ COS/ TORMWATER ~ ; .
ENTRAN E ~T ~ ~ ~ I 53 ~ ~ MANAG MENT ESI~ ~ , it I~ i ~ /
~ 48 , ~ . ~ 52 49
47
~ 1 ~~i
~ ~ \ EXISTING , ~ I~ , ~ 1 1 • CA 1
~ ~ ~ ~ HEATER 'I o I~ - ~ ~ T ~ -a , ~ ~ WELL L O ~ / I ~ , ~ \ Vii ATER TviAI ~ / aN R~l eei ELL LOT ogee.. eee ~
,~I MB 1995 PG ~ / ~ c ? .•e ESS1 ''ti~q 1 F 0 . 995 PG 624 ~ ~9~
~ ~ \ ~ I o , ~ ~ o -i~ i ~ \ / ~ aQ ~ i e e • • e 1 SEAL
~ ~ ~ o \ \ ~ A PORTION OF ~ ~ ~ e /
~ ~ ~ \ / ~ APPROVED ; 16269 r , \ • 1e e • e ee° Q ~
OAK CHASE PHASE 2 ~ 20 SAN. S WER ~ ~ ~ _ / \ TOWN OF CARY e .y e, ~ \ ee ~ •eeeeee . / • S ` •
~ ~ l MB 1995 PG 624 - _ - - ' EASEMENT P ~ ea E. CPS ~ ~A roved b Date 'en1 111•
~ z BM 1995, PG 24 ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ 1 I c-~ \ PP Y 11111„ / Pi~nnmg Date so o so X20
~ ~ _ ,
engineering uate
- - ~ SCALE; 1 = 60
No. Revision Date B Designer Scale Sheet No.
A TOC 1st REVIEW COMMENTS 11./22Z041 GAS W&R 1"=60' WATE R S~ R"ENEL 'ER SANITARY SEWER/ STORM DRAINAGE WITHERS
~ 8 TOC 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 1 /03/05 GAS Drawn By Date WRENN MEADOW
C TOC 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 1 24 05 GAS GAS 10/4/04 Checked By lob No. AN AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 3 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.wither5ravenel.com
JAB 203141.1