20050163 Ver 1_Complete File_20050306

??F W AT Fq0 Michael F. Easley, Governor
-O G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p -? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 13, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
City of Wilson
C/o Charles W. Pittman
P.O. Box 10
Wilson, NC 27894-0010
DWQ EXP No. 05-0163
Wilson County
Subject Property: City of Wilson Hominy Swamp Sewer
EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM NOTIFICATION
Dear Mr. Pittman:
On March 10, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) issued your Water Quality Certification for wastewater
system improvements. Within the Water Quality Certification that you received there is a condition that reads:
Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in writing at the
letterhead address within 10 days of the commencement of construction.
This is a part of the Express Review Program that is required to ensure compliance during construction and post
construction. Therefore, if you have begun construction of the wastewater system improvements, you are required to
notify this office in writing by July 23, 2006. If you do not notify this office in writing and construction has started,
you are in violation of the Water Quality Certification Rules as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0507(c).
This letter is to notify you and make you aware of this new condition that has been written into the Water Quality
Certifications issued within the Express Review Program. Please call Lia Myott at [phone] if you have any
questions regarding this matter.
S' c rely,
Cyndi Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK11em
cc: W.L. Younce, Green Engineering, P.O. Box 608, Wilson, NC 27893-0608
USACOE, Raleigh Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050163City W ilsonHominySew(Wilson)EXP+NOT
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit t
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: ht mMi2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
One
Np
v Carolina
Ntura!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
July 17, 2006
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
SUBJECT: Notification of Construction
DWQ Express Permit No. 05-0163
City of Wilson - Wastewater System Improvements
Hominy Swamp Gravity Sewer Extension
Wilson, North Carolina
PN: 99-002.1
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Please be informed by receipt of this letter that construction has commenced on the above subject
project.
If you should have any questions, please call.
Respectfully,
W. Landon ounce, P.E.
WLY
cc: Charles W. Pittman - Deputy City Manager, City of Wilson
Barry Parks - Water Resources Manager, City of Wilson
Q[arrgEBW[RI
JUL 2 0 2006
DENR - WATER QUALITY
KcIt ND3 AND STDRMMATER BRANCH
GREEN ENGINEERING, PLLC
VAWo99\99002.1\Cyndi K( oly Fa(7-17-06).dogVATER, WASTEWATER SURVEYING, PLANNING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT 07117/06 5:04PM
303 N. GOLDSBORO ST. PO BOX 609 WILSON N.C. 27893 TEL [phone] FAX [phone] WWW.GREENENGINEERING.COM
?0F WA TFgQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
O G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p -? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 13, 2006
DWQ EXP No. 05-0163
Wilson County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED n [R cg f 1 (j-WFl--
City of Wilson U L/ I? D
C/o Charles W. Pittman JUL 17 2006
P.O. Box 10
Wilson, NC 27894-0010------
GREEN ENGINEERING P L.L.C?
Subject Property: City of Wilson Hominy Swamp Sewer ---
EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM NOTIFICATION
Dear Mr. Pittman:
On March 10, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) issued your Water Quality Certification for wastewater
system improvements. Within the Water Quality Certification that you received there is a condition that reads:
Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in writing at the
letterhead address within 10 days of the commencement of construction.
This is a part of the Express Review Program that is required to ensure compliance during construction and post
construction. Therefore, if you have begun construction of the wastewater system improvements, you are required to
notify this office in writing by July 23, 2006. If you do not notify this office in writing and construction has started,
you are in violation of the Water Quality Certification Rules as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0507(c).
This letter is to notify you and make you aware of this new condition that has been written into the Water Quality
Certifications issued within the Express Review Program. Please call Lia Myott at [phone] if you have any
questions regarding this matter.
Si c rely,
Cyndi Karoly,
4 1 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBK/lem
cc: W.L. Younce, Green Engineering, P.O. Box 608, Wilson, NC 27893-0608
USACOE, Raleigh Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050163CityWilsonHominySew(W ilson)EXP+NOT
No` Carolina
401 Oversight / Express Review Permitting Unit t Nt/gaily
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httn:02o enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Mike Horan
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: KPn Schi,stPr
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name City of Wilson : Hominy Swamp Sewer County Nilson
Project Number 05 0163 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date Recvd By Region
Project Type Wastewater system improvement
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.

Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Go ahead and issue when ready (2/14/05 Michael Horan)
cc: Regional Office Page Number 11
Central Office
?OF WATF9p Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
>
p -- .? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 14, 2007
DWQ Project # EXP 05-0163
Wilson County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
City of Wilson
Attn: Mr. Charles W. Pittman
112 North Goldsboro Street
Wilson, NC 27894
POST-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Subject Property: City of Wilson - Wastewater System Improvements, Hominy Swamp Gravity
Sewer Extension (PN: 99-002.1)
Dear Mr. Pittman:
On January 31, 2007, Cynthia Van Der Wiele and Lia Myott conducted an on-site 401 Water Quality
Certification compliance inspection of the Hominy Swamp Gravity Sewer Extension in Wilson, North
Carolina. Compliance inspections are required for all Express Review projects. This letter is to inform
you of the following items that need to be addressed on your site:
I) Sewer crossing causing streambank erosion: At Stream Crossing #1, DWQ staff observed
bank erosion on the right bank of Hominy Swamp caused by the placement of the sewer pipe
crossing the stream at other than a 90 degree angle. The location of the sewer pipe near the
channel bed is causing the pipe to act like a vane, directing water toward the right bank of the
stream. See enclosed photo log for clarification.
Please stabilize this streambank using bioengineering practices to the maximum extent practical and
provide this office with a photo log of the completed project within 60 days of the receipt of this letter. If
you utilize methods other than bioengineering practices to resolve this situation, you must first
demonstrate to the Division of Water Quality that you have exhausted all feasible bioengineering options.
If you have any questions, please telephone Lia Myott or Cynthia Van Der Wiele in the Central Office in
Raleigh at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
i
Cyndi Karoly,
401 Oversight/Express Review
Permitting Unit
C13K1cvdW1em
Attachments: Photo Log
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Intemet:http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
NOne
hCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
City of Wilson
Page 2 of 2
February 14, 2007
cc: File Copy
USACE Raleigh Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
Central Files
W.L. Younce, Green Engineering, P.O. Box 608, Wilson. NC 27893-0608
Filename: 050163CityofW ilson(W ilson)lnspection
J
City of Wilson - Wastewater System Improvements
Hominy Swamp Gravity Sewer Extension
401 Compliance Inspection Photo Log

Photo 1: Sewer pipe at Stream Crossing #1
Photo 2: Streambank erosion caused by sewer pipe at Stream Crossing 41
WA
O T ?RQG
LU?(a) --1
January 28, 2005
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
City of Wilson
112 North Goldsboro Street
Wilson, North Carolina 27894
Fax #: [phone]
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Project Name: City of Wilson
Nash County
Subject Property: Beginning off of Ward Boulevard, extending to Canal Drive, and on to Ripley, crossing
Raleigh Road (264 Alt.), paralleling Hominy Swamp to Norfolk Southern Railroad, just
north of Norfolk Southern Railroad right-of-way in the City of Wilson, NC
Dear Sir or Madam:
On January 26, 2005, the Wetlands/401 Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a Fax/email request from
Green Engineering regarding a project known as "City of Wilson-Wastewater System Improvements" for
acceptance into the Express Review Program. This letter advises you that your project will be accepted into the
Express Review Program once the following items are received: 1) a fee of $3,000.00 made payable to the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, 2) seven complete and collated copies of the application and 3) seven copies
of all additional information pertaining to this project. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Please keep in mind that the clock for this project will not start until receipt of the completed application package
and required fee are received.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call Cyndi Karoly at
919-733-9721 or Deborah Edwards at 733-9502.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
AWK/dae
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
W. Landon Younce, PE-Green Engineering, PLLC, 303 N. Goldsboro St., PO Box 609, Wilson, NC 27893
Filename: City of Wilson-WW System Improvements
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncN%etlands
NhCarolma
oce
Xturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50°o Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

s i`1;LI1
??ECEIVED
-a
January 24, 2005 .3 '-
?,?a i• F
'l•
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources o ? ?
Division of Water Quality - Wetlands Unit V D
Parkview Building JAN 2 6 2005
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
DENR - WATER QUALITY
VIETl{WDS A40 STORMWATER BRANCH
Attention: Ms. Debbie Edwards
SUBJECT: Express Permit Application
City of Wilson - Wastewater System Improvements
Hominy Swamp Gravity Sewer Extension
Wilson, North Carolina
PN: 99-002.1
Dear Ms. Edwards:
In regards to our telephone conversation on January 24, 2005, please find attached
application form for the Express Permit Application. After repeated attempts at faxing the
application I decided it best to mail the package to your office.
If you should have any questions, please call.
Respectfully,
rL'ce,P.E.
WLY
Enclosures: As stated.
GREEN ENGINEERING, PLLC
V:%Wo99\99002.1%d,bbiccdwudsit(1-24-05).ck,-ATER, WASTEWATER SURVEYING, PLANNING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT 01/2V054:38PNt
303 N. GOLDSBORO ST. PO BOX 609 WILSON N.C. 2 7893 TEL [phone] FAX [phone] WWW.GREENENGINEERING.COM
A
,? "Y",
INITIAL INTEREST IN PARTICIPATION IN THE EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAMP/1C
WITHIN THE 401 OVERSITE/EXPRESS PERMITTING UNIT
September 1, 2004
Version 3
Applicant Name: City of Wilson
Applicant Address: 112 North Goldsboro Street
Wilson North Carolina 27894
Applicant's phone number: 1252) 399-2461
Fax number: [phone]
Applicant's email address:
Consultant Name (if applicable): Green Engineering, P.L.L. C. c???-
Consultant address (if applicable): 303 North Goldsboro Street 2o (?-)o x (,-og
Wilson, North Carolina 27893 ?S r n MC ;Z7 %S` G
Consultant's phone number (252) 237--5365 Fax number: [phone]
Consultant's email address: Lyorince(a?greeneng.conr
Type of action requested under the Express Review Program (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification ?
? Isolated Wetland Permit
Riparian Buffer Approval ?
? Stormwater Management Plan
? Mitigation Plan
? stream ? wetland ? buffers (check all appropriate)
Stream Origin Determination
# of Determinations Requested
Intermittent/Pereanial Determination
# of Determinations Requested
Name of Project: Wastewater System Improvements County: Wilson
Total project acreage: 10 (acres) Total built out impervious area: 0 (acres)
Nearest named stream (from USGS topo map): Hominy Swamp
Please provide a brief description of this project (attach site plan if available):
Replacement ofexisting Hominy .Swamp Interceptor with proposed 24" diarneter Gravity Sewer Main ran Ward
Boulevard southeast to Norfolk Southern Railroad near Elizabeth Road.
0AW09199002.1UnU Interest Foam V3itt
Please attach a map of site location using USGS 1:24,000 map and county soil survey.
Location of project site - please include reference to the county, nearest name town and highway number:
Beginning just off Ward Boulevard extending to Canal Drive and on to Ripley, crossing Raleigh Road (264A It.).
paralleliLig Hominy Swamp to Norfolk Southern Railroad just north ofNorfolk Southern Railroad right-of=way in the
City of Wilvon Wilson County
Proposed impacts: 0.04 Acres of 404 wetlands
Acres of isolated wetlands
70 Linear feet of streams
Linear feet of isolated streams
7.000 Square feet of protected stream buffers
Has consultant or applicant attended any DWQ-sponsored training sessions in the past two years? If so, please list
which ones. No
Has any DWQ staff visited the site? No , if yes, please provide DWQ staff name,
and date of visit:
Which other environmental permits from other agencies will be needed for this project? Please list the permits and
issuing agencies below:
Permits Issued:
Permit No WO 0021376 - Division o Water Ouah(y Dated: January 9, 2004
Permit No 01-1527 - Division of Water Quality Dated:.hdy 2, 2002
Permit Wilson WW Reclaim / Reuse Extension - Division of Land Resources Dated: August 8, 2003
Does this project require approval under the State Environmental Policy Act or National Environmental Policy Act?
No
Is this project an After-the-fact application or has this project received a previous Notice of Violation from DWQ?
No
Does this project require approval of a Variance from the NC Environmental Management Commission? No
Arc you aware of any local controversy concerning this project? If so, please describe the controversy and any
measures that have been taken with respect to public involvement.
This form must be submitted via email (c/o 401expressCa ncmail.net), faxed (919-733-6893) or hand-delivered to the
Parkview Building, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604. Applicants who are selected to participate in the
Express Review Program will be notified via email or fax within 2 days. Successful applicants will then be instructed
regarding detailed procedures for full application (Please Note: Submittals of the review packages on Friday after
12:00 pm will be stamped as received on the next business day).
Please contact Debbie Edwards at 919-733-9502 if you have any questions regarding this form.
0.\Wo99\99002.1\Intial Interest Forth V3.rtf 2
PROJECT AREA

PEACHTREE ROAD
KINCSIMD ROM
ESSa r
KDAWDRfH AVEN
5-rp-v%M Q
cpc--;6 oAc.,;
LOCATION MAP
NO SCALE

/w ?_ / ??1 51? CT
f5e
/
/
TBM #2
ELEV. 1 10.E

RAILROAD

MILE POST
/

MANI-
s
1185
ARC FILTER BERM 0 EXIST.
42"0 RCP
(SEE DETAILS - SHEET D1 OF 2)
/ MANHOLE 7503 "
/ STA. 4+53.18
100 LF 36"0 STEEL CASING 2405AN
(DRY BORE & JACKED) 2+O --- E-----o--
42
, .
1505AN
150SAti
_------
„
MANHOLE #6836 AND ,9 „,,.r,,,,nr,nn,r„,,,,,„nr„
;. MANHOLE #6839 TO ""
m
ID SEALED
r,r,nrnnnmrnn,nrn
nnn,"r
n,nnn,rnnmr,r
w ,
prr,,,,
EX. MANHOLE #6860
-
15m -''?
' - --X. MANHOL

E 6859 ,,
nnrmnr ,nn„
TOP 111.00
INV. 92.93 (IN) /
TOP 110.35
........... INV. 92.85 (OUT)
- -'- INV. 92.62
? IN ........
INV. 92.76 OUT)
\
r...
mnnrrn"
4HOLE #6859
?C
\
4D SEALED ? rrn,r,nn

nnn
,rr,rrrnn'^

\
? rnrrnnn p,nrnr \
\ ??rubM?N „sw TBM #1
"
,NITS OF
240

3"0 STEEL CASING
& JACK)

RAILROAD SPIKE IN 12o PINE Al
STA. = 11 +79.93 (37' LT)
\ . ELEVATION 111
\ TBM #2
\ RAILROAD SPIKE IN 10"0 PINE AT
\ STA. = 5+77.88 (77.32' LT)
TBM ELEVATION 111
\ fil-ROAD SPIKE IN POWER POLE AT
® STA. _ -0+69.12 (11.33' RT)
ELEVATION 10,
100 YR. BASE FLOOD ELEV. = 110.65' (OLD'
100 YR. BASE FLOOD ELEV. = 111.50' (STAl

?T?EP??M C(2osS.Tr? G--
I?ID.
IN,
30'x20'x6" TEMPORARY STONE
\ \ _ . CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
\ B-B
TOP 107.04 ;-? EX. MANHOLE 7445
TOP 107.55
-•_or,. INV. 98.19 (IN)
EX. CB EX INV. 98.12 (OUT)
cr t . a ,°s
\ 150$,q? `
• \\ P 107.12 VENT
EX. MANHOLE 310 \ 4}400
"
z4,
TOP 107.14 hm OF,
INV. 99.28 (8",a ) ° MANHOLE 7514
INV. 98.03 15"0 ) ?I>a STA. 2+56.79
INV. 97.89 OUT yy
EX. MANHOLE 1311
85 LF 36"0 STEEL CASING
TOP 106.71 BM
INV. 101.26 ?IN 15" 0? """ ,..u. ELEV. 107.00 (DRY BORE & JACK)
INV. 96.99 IN 24"0
SW INV.103.64
INV. 96.71 OUT 24 0) «.?,
\EX. BRIDGE
?? a \ INV.
01.21
NV. I ` .c• \ 10 .53
.aa ?6m `
v _ 6o{y? \ \ I 6??y_ _ ? .
DUX \ 4?SA/V m I EX. CB
TOP 10 .19
X DO \ \ \ yo ?m \ INV. 103.25
12>eSNJ
, . ? ? 1201
Fil ,
• ?1 I O
EX.
?i? cqN 00.78 EX. MANHOLE 6973 FLOWER BEDS
D,7iv pn'c TOP 107.29
INV. 981243 IN) O)
I INV. 98.30 OUT)
I
EX. MANHOLE 6975
TOP 109.24
INV. 103.83 (OUT)
BENCH MARK ?
" X " CHISELED IN HEADWALL ON SOUTH SIDE OF
KINCAID AVE. STA. = 1+76.66 (14.50 RT)
ELEVATION 107.00
TBM #4
RAILROAD SPIKE IN POWER POLE.
STA. = 9+82.78 (104.85 RT)
0 ELEVATION 109.38
'33
Gwooo cn -+
/ /44
L??\ I
Uk.YAK 11Vlr 1`4 1 Ur 14A ! Ktr buuRuLb
AND COMMUNITY LOPMENT
RALEIGH, NORTr1 uAROLINA
5055 /V SW
!'.N!I:STCAD CCOSS.'ronr.°) 77 r,
I i . l
/'fore Hills 4
r Pa I
J
\ •
14
PARKS/Of/ ? ? ?
/
0
-- /.
Broo
77 All. TO U.S. 64
236 55' 0A!/ ] ;. C „
•I, Ian « ?IJZ3 ?? ?'' ?? i ? sa - ?? ??
Sch
14
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
No' TILJTI SHOWN ON PLANS ARE LO(
SEEDING AND MULCHING TO BE ATq50ED-WrrfflfT 15 APPROXIMATELY. CONTRACTOR SHAL
WORKING DAYS OR 30 CALENDAR DAYS, WHICHEVER IS FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION OF AL
SHORTER, OF ALL LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES NOT AND SERVICES WHETHER SHOWN ON
PREVIOUSLY STABILIZED.
SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN OR AS DEEMED
NECESSARY BY VISUAL OBSERVATION.
SILT FENCE o o o o-o
INLET PROTECTOR 11
ROCK CHECK DAM O
LEGEND: SEE DETAIL SHEET D2 OF 2.
CONTACT "NC ONECAH " AT 1-800-
LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRI(
CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE R
REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING FACILITIES
CONTRACTOR SHALL TIE ALL EXISTIN(
FOUND, INTO PROPOSED MANHOLES
CONNECTIONS. EACH EXISTING SERA
RECONNECTED THE DAY IN WHICH TF
SERVICE IS DISTURBED. NO EXISTIN
BE LEFT UNCONNECTED OVERNIGHT.
EX. MANHOLE 7467
15ms
EX. MANHOLE 7465 TOP 109.49
INV. 102.59 (IN)
TOP 111.23 NV. 102.03 IN) INV. 102.55 (OUT) 15my31 -
INV. 102.00 OUT)
150snr+ 150s"N O fNr MANHOLE 7521
STA.23+31.77
240SM 240sm (VENTED)
24msnrr
MANHOLE 7520 1p?
STA. 20+93.38
RY BORE & JACKED

(. MANHOLE #7300
IP 108.93
J. 103.93 4"0 SER.
J. 103.93 4"0 SER.
J. 102.56 1
IN)
J. 102.56 OUT)
TOP 109.99
INV. 102.90 (IN)
INV. 102.84 (OUT)
-, 150SM
50'x2O'x6" TEMPORARY STONE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE

INV. u«
102.49 uuuuuuu noun
ui?µm
uiuu`
MANHOLE
STA.24+88
15
240SAN
I
EX.
BLDG.
/ 100 YR. BASE FLOOD ELEV. = 113.90' (STATION 15+00)
100 YR. BASE FLOOD ELEV. = 115.00' (STATION 30+00)
%, iFFT NUMBFR
WILSON COUNTY, I
? m
(Joins shoot I) No
GoA AaA
Ab
i I ?! , ' ?• u(} ?i i c htoB ?J4Y' sd w 6 ?'•.t? 9f NoA ?; DP N
?UF' ?3??u? ?? ,• .? d M •"clD7
d AoA ? ?'- Yr'F<? No[Fa? Noo \
i GpA fill
-?? rte 'n )t) t j3 • ;? • ? 44 f MaA t
K t r r' Tt.
k GIB,- M r 1
,Gtl,,'A
>. 1 l l` ? 1 `J Nn 'i r r?_l f Tt A qc o
FNtiF}; e GIB2 ^
' -'?i^: f4 ? # }ii?i`? r? t '?? ?•??'t,r 4*•irj,, f. ? •? .... ? k•. r d ? ri" I?a.
f 1k t
4
7r
A `'?.._- ?,?' '? #, 'y }ie"! ?', It } / al - fell _ _ r ,a- ?tj'y \•{, U':~ ...i ?uAy.r_:*??` "? t -.'."'`,•- Bt.
'ou 'r
iijo
Gu 1 •° z ?'
l;u Is
- ..?? c, ?.'•, U •? 1'{.: .air. ? ?r,.t ( ?c,,,r ??.?. ? Y, ? .ri' ar ? ? ti,`' -.
(( •1. 4ta .'kFJ1 4 +L[uD lie ti; GpA
Fib 1 r. y ?. f r"\ c tN, / Rb Rh t'
p - U(i? [? r ter. f r?1? • r. Gu .:.%
p: Up 1'; i QpA ?• , \ ?, ti .i RUY Q Gi Ur r
Fr` '':t tip`` t' ?{ ti..??' •' • by l
NuEF '" / Gu . Rb t sr `' ` fSP
Rb r l tt'• ? Rib r, 1 1-11
< ) + P
E{r NuD NGD 7t
Urfr`-yl V1 GpA a "GU G
Nu Ll
g h QpA # h ` PH t r
i )- '• ' r. r • Rh _ r j .d , ?l?i:-t A. NoA
I. b FJwC Ur `I' t ?• ri t
./e .t•?y'? +*: ,4 ?Jt7J i+' J , ?r , ` j ,? UOA
3b '00,
'.1`?(s r ts'
?, 1 ; i •,', t. G(1 0 Gu UP A
t?+ptL t a Y "'GnA ?' .\
? . s.
L
+ i' o
.? UrF,,
G
t' is ,,, --. i•- ?. Gogl
Ra . Rb t{uD?C FY d`'r 4,. \ ?" "'
' / - C
\ (kt1 t f- t N, It
_ .? •h ,Y'. i Ur ', r Rb ", ' ,a j.-'
- - qYA . t `` • fie' '3b .y \ .!- o• P \ r. GU ^ Rd
ea t . J O GD A ,. -__
, Go c
Ila a tl{0 {, r rL y{ ?* ?0?? ?1 \?''
tCsit
?
Ayn
t Ur
S 0 ?a r. F llrt . NoA NuF; !
f NOD
NNO r `-
Pair .. , \e
r 6v" 7fi? f ! I:
NoA Noo Ur roc GoA
/ Cff72
a• f Re Goq ?T
U
t3b+. y r (;142 Nod T U r?q No ' 1 w '
r
%- • fC w . s Noo {' i1 , . ?.
f ( ?NnD ( 13I137 GoA I
// GlD2
y,/?? { ! /_ LI,• ? 21 do
- -- v ?J/ llr ..}. Tt ..`'j- NoA _ Qt7,..?'i r1E.A
1
February 24, 2005
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality - Wetlands Unit
Parkview Building
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
FEB V
"ET1?DSANDs t' L4U:-L-iT-Y
RY?YA' TER SRNXH
Attention: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
SUBJECT: Additional Information Request
Express Permit Application Review
City of Wilson - Wastewater System Improvements
Hominy Swamp Gravity Sewer Extension
Wilson, North Carolina
PN: 99-002.1
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Please accept the following responses to comments received from your office dated
February 21, 2005:
Comment No. l: Proposed impacts at location #2 are greater than 105 degrees and
are proposed at a location crossing 2 jurisdictional channels. The
application submitted did not include the proposed impacts to the
second channel. Please move or reconfigure the sewerline crossing
at location #2 to minimize impacts to riparian buffers and
jurisdictional channels.
GREEN ENGINEERING, PLLC
V\Wo99\99002.1%Cymdi Karolylti(2-24-05).doaVATER, WASTEWATER SURVEYING, PLANNING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT 0212N05 II:03 AM
303 N. GOLDSBORO ST. PO BOX 609 WILSON N.C. 27893 TEL [phone] FAX [phone] WWW.GREENENGINEERING.(OM
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
February 24, 2005
Page Two (2)
Response No. 1: 1i'7?en ibis projecl uvus.firsl dcsi rmcd, ti revicir of holh the (I,S'(;S
O1lUdlYmti/e and the lVilson ('011111_)' Soil SHITCY I-CIVU/Ctl 117ut the
mtlin chunnel of HonlillY Slt,amp llvs the onll• crossing tit llli.s
locution to he considered juri.sdicliollul it-tilers (I'leusc see
unachcd (hladraligle (Intl Soils SnrvCl-.tor the (bell). 1 lnlderst4111d
the Ut?7s1o11 S Collcei'1? 1'e0"UR/lng crossiligs of ('rc(ilcr Shull 10
de-recs. But pleuse ullo?t, me 10 eluhorale 011 the htisis of sound
hl•t/rUldic desi(n us it per/uills 10 (vvv/.ll'se?rers. I"irsl, This project
Will wrvc tv; (I Scliniti1-1, serer rCphicellle111 of (111 exislillif Clged
sl'sicnl. i)lle to CclpclCl/V isslles Und the mCreused fi-equencl' ill
suill.Orl, seller ovel.J1o?rs, Ihi.s line mist he upgrudcd to the
copac1-1 - l• propose(/ There (Ire exisYinir constraints 111111 Illis
procedure. Both upsvretin? tind dolt,rnsiretnn connections must he
etude to cxislintr se?rers, Ihcrehl, Iinliti1w the options./or Ivrvin('>
the locution of the insl(dlulion. Also, given /he existence of
sallion..SC11er cusellie1/IS till[/ the Cuse U/ lllallltlll/1t11i' /lie Current
locution of the s?•slem, it is hi',hh' efficient and ccollonlical to keep
the c1117•elll loculions llhe It lr(ulsfel rind /he ne?1 main (ICross
j111-isdiclionul areas. This also u11o?rs.for millinull disturhunce to
exislin propelI-v, rocrdu'uvs, ulililies, tint/ siret 1/11s, it-here
crossings (lid not exist before, such us is the c(ise tit ('rossin?I Alo.
?. ,? luncrn erin aroma/ the exislin?t In i(!tie of Iliplc' i - I)ri?-c poses u
unique conllict cis uvc// cis ?miintainhig.folt, in exisling Yelvers on
either .side of Hominti' .S'?rcnmp lullil the licit, interceptor is complete.
Me (Inglc of crossil?(,T is se/ in such a irul, us to nluinltiin the
current crossing location, (111o1t, f n- llolr in the exislinLr main until
/lie licit, project is complete, and avoid conflicts 111111 the existin("
hlvcl?c. hin-Ihermore, riren CiliTent design mcihods,for irllerccpior
se?t,ers, it is highll, recommended thin no (rculer /hall a 45-degree
Ir(Insition be etude 1111-oll"11 a .seller manhole oil c1 line size of this
diameter. 171is cillolls the seller to lnainluin till efficient relocily
1hrough the rlltinhole and lessens the lhreul of hack-itps (Ind
sunilurl' se?1cr ovc1 flo?1s. In the cusc.lor Cros.sin?? No. ?, cillhou 4i
a >0-dcgree cro.ssin(,r nniy he ideal in minimizing hlrffcr impucis, a
45-deLrree option is the more hl dru11/icu//1' sutrnc/ upprouclt.
V:\Wo99\9 02.1\C)ndi Kwoly Itr(2-25-05). dm 02/2VO5 11:03 AM
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
February 24, 2005
Page Three (3)
Comment No. 2: Proposed impacts at location #1 requests parallel impacts to zone 1
& 2 of the riparian buffer, the application requests only impacts to
zone 2. Parallel impacts to the riparian buffer in Zone I are an
allowable with mitigation activity. Please move or reconfigure the
sewerline to avoid zone 1 impacts. In addition, an existing
"drainage ditch" has been piped for a construction corridor to the
sewerline, there are additional riparian buffer impacts associated
with this activity, these impacts need to be included in your
application.
Response No. ': 1hC C.?islin?? "clruina?rc clilch" relirence(1 tress crealecl trhen llle
Streel,S lvere clelvlopccl ill 1170 resicleIli( l are(/ lsi to the east of
('rossin,,, No. 1. 111c clllch //Self is 11[)11-11!/7.S[I/ChUllUl, or al leclsl
has never heen (leclarecl to he ll-iszlicliollal, and lherejore eras
cli.sre"arcle(I cltn in?? /he sallilal t' setrc/' relVilcenlCnl clesi /l process.
-also, the pal•clllel impacts 1'*renceCl tri11 onh, lake place irilhin
gone ? of the riparian brlffers. Ii?henC?Cr possible cl high en/phusis
teas placed on 111aintaini1w the original location of /lie sanila/y
.w1ver main ?rhen inslallin( the 4" rcplacelnent wlwr /nail/.
1-lolreivr, gh,en /he irratle reylllretl to lie-ill to the exi.Adi/w Illal/hole
clotrnslreanl of Norfolk Sollthel-11 Kclilroacl as )cell as Imlinlaill
S1111lclela col'er over an cxistilW telecom// uniCal/oils Cable
lllallllalllecl b?' "Olles/", the loccilioll require(/ for Crosslll,,,- llll(ler
the rclilroml mi(I nlaking the connection to the exislin(,,- s1 slCnl 1c ft
little rooln for me jllsllllcnl.
I trust this information is sufficient for your continued review and approval of this
project. If you should have any questions, please call.
Respectfully,
W. andon ounce, P.E.
WLY
Enclosures: As stated.
cc: Barry Parks - Water Resources Manager, City of Wilson, N.C.
V:\WO9\99002.1\Cyndi Kx(,Iy Itr(2-24-05).do 02/24,105 11:03 AM

KK

II
---------
u
II
II
11
II
II
II
II/
If
II
II
II
N
?? I
\ p
\I\\ O
O
?3ss.
O/
110d
n
tX,

1

<< J." C :v el? 5, 6 qbj? ?- -- - SEa •Isavor;ssc?J +EE?
r9 -sn Ot 7:v uI MS.V,^s09
_ VNI106W.7) 'J.LNON `HOlZFlVN
O ??? Q IHIRWdOT A.LINf1WW00 QNV
SSONWS216 VN JO .LN2W.LNVdRQ
------------- - -------- ------
r T { ..in efrv T - 921 drr" ynV L
n }t : l s T :? c
?:.' ea?? / • •• in,
yr' " .? f\ ctl.!'? . 'V ?!? ..
`.A 1i
1 : Y1C
/
aa' l
1
I

1
Y'
,, t
FEB 2 5 2005
oENR- WATER
?NDSArrDsroR1l q ?BAH
m
Tt GoA © Z (Joins sheet 1) No
ON t ( 1714 ? " fr `• ,,«?+ GHQ •? ?1IuD. 1. + 'Ca AID •?,`r? ``- ?` ' Rb , '?' ai •`-,?
t r r: G4'., r NoBt , a ?, . , NGD tit MaD NU{3' s? '` ?t l? "•'l
ttb t •?rl.?^;z ?'?'?f NoA a t tau SNu? 'i. H Gu r 1 d9 1
;< +Jtq',?yt,`} rlla}3rt t1 ' y F pA f ° Ra o AaA' ^ r; } W
Z GP" F 41f S ?`i '-'7, ?F c''t' , " ' oe b ? '` ? ?,u.i d' w ,z]"' • ?,' V Q. 5 ..,'1 2 L .r ? r ?
•i ?' .V`,i? t? :.?,'? i Gil;7 ? "? ?. > I+? ?; l ab? rt'• ?. / -'„ft.? rr ?'? h ? 1?
!3b r ?? Jr ?4't.,!;,`? F?[. 'S d ?t,?3?i? r. S??.A ?,k• t?a\ ? t ?p? ",??u© Ra ft' ? y,?yc
' '~ t" ? ?, v' •tau• Zl !R ._ "?. •. ?.? M` tt' r '. V`-^ i "S GIB2' >?• 1
Gv t ?i `? 1
? \Aaq 'r,'Id?itnt rS .c ? [ .. f t ? s`• .\ is t'`I? ? r 'r?s 'cRb ? y??r ?r ?:i. .?,,1.
? 1 ., J r?-t lf' Gy • ,. Hb : r ?dY . 'Y Y "_ 4 r r? lz. ?.
-Nog?GtD2 'r,?': Gb /+ •'•e u ? J X115 ?+,???•.1?t'?a F'Y +,? 9 11+i ?. 1 ; ?, ??? ,` jFN`?•? ¢ f Ra y 1 rN?rL:7r? S ,t ?t
is ty. GtB23? i .p s,y y ?p?? ??. 1,. ?? v..st = Pit ?t f t 1K' rri it N.uw?'jr j` r 6
+. yr 4 0 hf t" r 1. ?•?` ?a,? : t fst" V:.y •I .r 3 1 r *a, u i'r;
wifIi ? r U$3t to `•r?1' tr.ir a?,J ? fU y,?nn.,f?.+ ;??_ tr??. '°f\rp?` ?XS' .p.3.fa??J?l.??..f'?•• - ':
NoA W Kt• rt" ?f, . _? poP ^' F ;*t ice} r a+ ?-- 4j, ,?lYrt4r r. a.r a.' Q.r `, .M,• Bb
'R 1 ? •? r1 ' fG? gA•!,ob t't U 'lt.:nlrrw. xz?{?l l' c.ru Gu
? ? . kJ ,?? IN.nt t ?iUi ??t?t nkKt ',• J •i? t??[+, 4jt??S l,}j,t F'???° + ' ?t ? MUD-;,''? ? t VQP
sr¢?„t?':, E ?? jt'? 6 . ? ,.y ? nt ? 2 Ct 1?? i?" 4•, lFgty •"q ` ?};t , .y'l. ?
3 l_.c
,. ?' 'Y GoA •`( ar t. u,;Y,, ?t f d •?.ty ? kk r.? r, ?, ??? ?p??r, ) ? >'.
:.ir ^T i t • i. '"r: .[C. -.F ?.A t-3JuBr i`t'?, ?
1'? 'r y?, t^` ly?'Z. t.. NUH? t;tr ^?? t ro fZb,r? ` ..tj11 f ' ir;%14 rt '.I'. ` . •? t
r ifhr'' 1 f B. Ud \ r E n K ?r+[ •Yi
w ) '`r t 1 .?:? [ _ ,i?r ry.... r t t A? .,'i1-t r `"L G''1 r ?' \:•i
11''fbCl .t,. .r G' tQ Y '.rte+''?? Kr D
' n GoA f _rt?i12'. •?y Y ??'r / i; ?" Y ¢`w.y. ?.r r 7ri? l
w_. k _?` _.l- li`' * ?• J- 1?r•,g i _ r... ??s_ • (?u?3 " Ur rr'r lii
'Fjt1 t t Rb t Gu Rb n , 4
i r it
C.?a' r 7?. Gu t t
JJ 1SIr ??? r . , ,-N:
y?; }} - e ? ,h-. t ".?? '{ S `: ?' :ff :> nr_p;; D?r• n r • ?,t:. _ r •.t"
r s • • ,NttF,?d'
} 1_ 1
Ur G'
AYA ( xr ` i, ,•t?1u + :rGu Wl6bV 4{ ?; 41r•t?j
1
s
c
i •r•
N
t
7
t
AYA 4? b
t- J3f3, ' p
.?
J NuE3+
r [
Y-' Z
.r
1
io r
t ..
G J i.
tE32 •:r .
? • e ,++; r, ? •? ?6 Gu Rb
Ex 3i+ f;.g? ti
TAI p."'_'' i I t 1 Rh :{?? tz s'?.. i ?\.•:''' Gd Rb ? •Gti?? .jGP,A' rttl7 r> tt CLjF? rr4', t t `,Lt • y y2+??.' GpA ?l
• ? •r Ra ? r
-R a
• B, "1 R b rr • `i
a r
r
q U Rb `t
D
C
o _ Y
9 .?
D t63 Gu` J,^ + r' G3 t3 t yo 1 r
4y \
i
3
r
l
to r_'.?- N F.' ''h m " ?r • .,.,t' Ra o
AaA ' ',?Rb C l 't Ct ,,'
At;q Tt AaA Rp AYD i r -u [ ?,ti r Ga' i tl C'
? { Q
ti
1* U r
0
.ir S t A .G
t
P
tlr
Q +,
t ?i N
r'
a
s
s
• 761 % .
S ?
abP l StA tia NoA NoD Ur Icoc
• \1 j , *g GtB2 ,
b r
G
t Tt 2 {1h .-? , .? f Nob ° s?
Ur 00
?G?q 11 4i '$tA ? J'' GoA ! NoD yj Gt82' W G
_ e
Rte ?? Nob r
r(?».?.?:. Ego.. y `Y •N oe ^.? ---'!J'. /• ? l i. D? 1•\?r?'?` T. ' ?? ?.4 '
If
O?O? W A r?9QG
D
O ?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
March 10, 2005
City of Wilson
Post Office Box 10
112 N. Goldsboro St.
Wilson, NC 27894
Subject Property:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ EXP No. 05-0163
Wilson County
City of Wilson-Wastewater System Improvements
Hominy Swamp [03-04-07, 27-86-8, C NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE
per the Neuse River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS
EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Sir or Madam:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 0.04 acres of wetlands, 90 feet of streams and 15,665 square
feet (ft) of protected riparian buffers for the purpose of 4 sewer line crossing at 3 different
locations at the subject property, as described within your application dated February 2, 2005 and
received by the Division of Water Quality on February 9, 2005 and all additional information
submitted and received on February 24, 2005, March 4, 2005 and March 9, 2005. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by the N.C. Division
of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3374 (GC3374). The
Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 12 when issued by the US Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for
impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should
obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go
ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control and Non-
discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or
CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 211.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] /Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
o Carolina
Ni`
NturalllJ
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
City of Wilson
Page 3 of 4
3/10/05
requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the
mitigation requirement. In accordance with 15A NCAC 213 .0242(7), this contribution will
satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2B .0233(10). Until
the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Ecosystem
Enhancement Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall
occur. The EEP should be contacted at [phone] if you have any questions
concerning payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. You have one month from
the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this
Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration
Fund to compensate for 26,040 ft2 of required riparian buffer mitigation for impacts
to 8,680 ft2 of protected riparian buffers; 03-04-07 river and subbasin, 27-86-8 stream
index."
5. Sewer Systems
The project shall comply with 15A NCAC 2H.0219(i)(2)(G) and all other State, Federal
and local sewer system regulations.
6. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in
wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored
within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the
project.
7. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
8. Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in
writing at the letterhead address within 10 days of the commencement of construction.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
0F W AT`Z Michael F. Easley, Govemor
P
?
? ? t
R
S
Willi
G
J
?
i
T 7 ecre
ary
oss
r.,
am
.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Water Quality Certification
Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500, City of Wilson has permission as outlined below to
impact 0.04 acres of wetlands and 90 linear feet of streams for the purpose(s) of constructing the
proposed Wastewater System Improvements in Wilson County. All activities associated with
these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached Permit
transmittal letter. THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM
DWQ #: 05-0163
DATE: 3110105
LOCATION: Wilson
COUNTY Wilson
BASIN/ STREAM INDEX 03-04=07/27-86-8
As required by 15A NCAC 211.0500, and the conditions of this Permit, you are required to
compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation
of wetlands and surface waters as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or
degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program must be rounded to one-quarter acre increments and linear foot requirements must be
rounded up to the nearest foot according to 15 2R.0503(b).
Impacts:
0.04 Acres of non- riparian wetlands
90 Linear feet of stream
15,665 Square feet of stream buffer
Mitigation:
26,040 Square feet of stream buffer
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirement is
through the payment of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R.0503. If you
choose this option, please sign this form and mail it along with a copy of your 401 Certification
or Buffer Approval to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program at the address below. An invoice
401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone]/ Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
None Carolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
MULTI COMMUNICATION REPORT
DATE MAR-10-2005 THU 14:37
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
REF. NAME
COMMUNICATION MODE: TX
NO. FAX NAME/NUMBER
10 912522919267
10 912522437489
START TIME TIME MODE PAGE
03-10 14:32 01'39" ECM 7/7
03-10 14:34 02'11" ECM 7/7
TOTAL TIME : 00:03'50"
TOTAL PAGES : 14
RESULTS
OK
OK
?F W ATF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
P
? i
R
J
S
ecretary
am G.
oss
r.,
Will

7
r
D
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: City of Wilson Fax #: [phone]
Landon Younce 252-243-7489
Subject: City of Wilson-Wastewater System Improvements Date: 3/10/05
Number of pages including cover sheet: 7
Notes or special instructions:
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Debbie Edwards at 919-733-9502.
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http:/A12o.cnr.state.nc.us!ncwctlands
N WiCarolina
A'alutally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

t '+N
H r
c

March 9, 2005
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality - Wetlands Unit
Parkview Building
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Debbie Edwards
a?D
? ? 2005
?O9
MP Ra?P?? o??`?
WPj? ?,,i1Pt?R
SUBJECT: Revised Pre-construction Notification Form
City of Wilson - Wastewater System Improvements
Hominy Swamp Gravity Sewer Extension
Wilson, North Carolina
PN: 99-002.1
Dear Ms. Edwards:
Please find attached Revised Pre-construction Notification Application Form for the
above project. The quantities for "Length of Impact (linear feet)" under the stream impacts
section have been revised back to those quantities matching the original application form.
I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. If you should have any
questions, please call.
Respectfully,
Landon Younce, P.E.
WLY
Enclosures: As stated.
cc: Mr. Kevin Yates - U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
GREEN ENGINEERING, PLLC
V.\Wo9"9002.1\deLlsecdw deltr(39-03).do,YVATER. WASTEWATER SURVEYING, PLANNING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT 03/091051:05 PM
303 N. GOLDSBORO ST. PO BOX 609 WILSON N.C. 27893 TEL 252.237.S36S FAX [phone] WWW.GREENENGINEERING.COM
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Mot Applicable" or "N/A".)
L Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: City of Wilson
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 10
Physical Address: 112 N. Goldsboro St.
Wilson, North Carolina 27894
Telephone Number. [phone] Fax Number. [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: W. Landon Youncc, P.E.
Company Affiliation: Green Engineering. P.L.L.C.
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 609
Physical Address: 303 N. Goldsboro St.
Wilson. North Carolina 27893
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: (252} 243-7489
E-mail Address: 1. oy unc @.izreeneng.com
Page 5 of 12
HL Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discxetioq
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: City of Wilson -Wastewater System Improvements -Hominy Swamp
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): City of Wilson Easements/NCDOT Right of Wa
4. Location
County: Wilson Nearest Town: Wilson
Subdivision name (include phasellot number): Utility Easements aloe Hg ominy Swamp
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Beginning off of Ward Blvd.,
Extending to Canal Drive. and on to Ripley Drive, crossing Raleigh Raod (IJS 264 Alt.).
Paralleling Hominy Swamp to Norfolk Southern Railroad just north of Elizabeth Road.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTTM or Lat/Long):see attached -Strewn Crossing SummM
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 10.0 Acres (disturbed area within Right of Ways and easements)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Hominy Swamp
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina`s seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http!Hh2o,enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: existing conditions consist of an established easement
maintained by the City of Wilson: for the purpose of providing sanitary sewer service. The
City has recentlyVerformed a stream restoration project in the area consisting of a portion of
the Hominy Swamp stream between Canal Drive and Raleigh Road.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Proposed
24" Ductile Iron Sanitary Sewer Interceptor to be installed by backhoe. This project consists_
of a parallel replacement interceptor system to reduce the increasing risk and affects of
inlfiltration/inflow that has been present in the project service area for quite some time.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To provide a new interceptor to replace the
aging sewer collection in the area. Infiltration and Inflow has plagued this portion of the Cih?
of Wilson's Interceptor for some time and conditions are growing worse. The new parallel
interceptor will provide adequate capacity as well as new materials, thereby adding life to the
system. No new sewer services area proposed as a result of this project.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
The City of Wilson's existing sanitM sewer interceptor along Hominy Swamp predates the
1950's. It is doubtful that any records of state approval can be obtained at this time.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No. there are no future permit requests anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. AAll proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:Stream and wetland characteristics
will not change as a result of this project. Project is underway. At onset of the first bore
evidence of flooding the bore pit developed. The casing depth is too shallow to prevent influent
water from the creek into the bore and bore pit Therefore open-cut-method is proposed for all
three (3) crossings of 24" &ravity sewer. Casing will still be utilized in the open-cut process
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
cs/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
1. Excavation 0.02 Yes 0 forested
2. Excavation 0.01 Yes 0 forested
3. Excavation 0.01 Yes 0 forested

List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FORA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps arc available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://xvNv,,v.fema.gov.
««* List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.5 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.04 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
lease specify)
1. Excavation 30 Hominy Swamp 50 ft. Perennial
2A. Excavation 20 Hominy Swamp 35 ft. Perennial
213. Excavation 20 U:r Hominy Swamp 20 fL Perennial
3. Excavation 20 Hominy Swamp 20 ft. Perennial

List each impact separately and identity, temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss(gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, e1c.1 cmcavalion, ditchiiWstriightming, etc. If strum relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
`• Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
wwwusgs sov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
N?Av inapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 90 ft.
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below: There are no open water impacts proposed.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbod
(if applicable) y Type of Watcrbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation A pond will not be created as a result of this project.
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
In an effort to avoid impacts the entire oroiect is located as a parallel to the existing interceptor
to be replaced. Hominy Swamp is crossed three (3) times but the crossing is necessary in order
to maintain the location and function of the existing sanitary sewer easements. Initially, ideally
each stream crossing was to be made by dry bore and jack operation. However, due to problems
with infiltration from the stream, this idea had to be abandoned for the open-cut method.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr. state.nc.us/ncwetlandslstrmgide. html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
All City of Wilson easements that border or include the existing Hominy Swamp stream
serve as a natural area and are not hindered by the interceptor `s location nor function. The
final constructed project will maintain the character of the existing environment.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at fib://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 8680 square ft.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
*
Zone Impact
(square feet)
Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,680 3 26,040
2 6,985 1.5
Total 15,665
Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12

Lf buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
The City of Wilson maintains all existing utility easements occupied by the existing
interceptor and the proposed 24" interceptor that will be utilized in this project.
XL Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
,Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
"downstream from the property.
This project is almost entirely pervious. All sanitary sewer mains will be installed below ground,
XII• Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All existing flows are tributary to the City of Wilson - Hominy Swamp WW. Treatment facility,
MIL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
MV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
This pLgject is underway. Although no stream crossings have been performed, a majority of the
remaining project is complete. It is the wish of the City of Wilson, that approval be granted
soon, so as not to conflict with contract time periods and the need for a contract time extension,-
Mr. Barry Parks - Water Resources Director, City of Wilson, North Carolina
4
2-/ r
Applicant/Agent's Signature . Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
Q+ ?
01 Lo3
March 9, 2005
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality - Wetlands Unit
Parkview Building
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Debbie Edwards
SUBJECT: Revised Pre-construction Notification Form
City of Wilson - Wastewater System Improvements
Hominy Swamp Gravity Sewer Extension
Wilson, North Carolina
PN: 99-002.1
Dear Ms. Edwards:
22@20Y20
MAR 1 1 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
«'ET IDS AND STORI,BYATER BRAI4CH
Please find attached Revised Pre-construction Notification Application Form for the
above project. The quantities for "Length of Impact (linear feet)" under the stream impacts
section have been revised back to those quantities matching the original application form.
I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused
questions, please call.
Respectfully,
Landon Younce, P.E.
WLY
Enclosures: As stated.
cc: Mr. Kevin Yates - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
If you should have any
GREEN ENGINEERING, P L L C
VAWc99\99002.1(dcbbiecdwuds1h(3-9-05).(WiATER, Vi AST EWATER SURVEYING, PLANNING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT 03/09/05 1:05 PM
303 N. GOLDSBORO ST. PO BOX 609 WILSON N.C. 27893 TEL [phone] FAX [phone] WWW.GREENENGINEERING.COM
III
p@PModP= B
MAR 1 1 2005
Office use only: wEW SAND STORMWATERIBRANCN roan Vccsion May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. C) S O 1 1n.3
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restor..tion Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: City of Wilson
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 10
Physical Address: 112 N. Goldsboro St.
Wilson, North Carolina 27894
Telephone Number [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A sigrLed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the olvner/applicant.)
Name: W. Landon Younce, P_E.
Company Affiliation: Green Engineering, P.L.L.C.
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 609
Physical Address: 303 N. Goldsboro St.
Wilson_ North Carolina 27893
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number_ [phone]
E-mail Address: 1,, oy_uncengreeneng.com
Fax Number. [phone]
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: City of Wilson -Wastewater System Improvements -Hominy Swamp
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):City of Wilson Easements/NCDOT Right of Way
4. Location
County: Wilson Nearest Town: Wilson
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Utility Easements along Hominy Swamp
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Beginning off of Ward Blvd.,
ExtendimJ to Canal Drive and on to Ripley Drive, crossing Raleigh Raod (US 264 Alt.)
Paralleling Hominy Swamp to Norfolk Southern Railroad just north of Elizabeth Road.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):see attached - Stream Crossing Summary
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 10.0 Acres (disturbed area within Right of Ways and easements)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Hominy Swamp
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://li2o.enr,state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9_ Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: existing conditions consist of an established easement
maintained by the Citv of Wilson for the nurnose of nrovidim-, sanitarv sewer service. The
City has recently performed a stream restoration project in the area consisting of a portion of
the Hominy Swamp stream between Canal Drive and Raleigh Road.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Proposed
24" Ductile Iron Sanitary Sewer Interceptor to be installed by backhoe. This project consists
of a parallel replacement interceptor system to reduce the increasing risk and affects of
inlfiltration/inflow that has been present in the project service area for quite some time.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To provide a new interceptor to replace the
wing sewer collection in the area Infiltration and Inflow has plagued this portion of the City
of Wilson's Interceptor for some time and conditions are growing worse. The new parallel
interceptor will provide adequate capacity as well as new materials thereby adding life to the
system No new sewer services area proposed as a result of this project.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
The City of Wilson's existing sanitary swver interceptor along Hominy Swamp predates the
1950's It is doubtful that any records of state approval can be obtained at this time.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No there are no future permit requests anticipated for this project
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below-- All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan- All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photogapps may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for waland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below- If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate slieet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:Stream and wetland characteristics
will not change as a result of this project. Project is underway. At onset of the first bore,
evidence of flooding; the bore pit developed. The casing depth is too shallow to prevent influent
water from the creek into the bore and bore pit. Therefore open-cut method is proposed for all
three (3) crossings of 24" gravity sewer. Casing will still be utilized in the open-cut process.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(-es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of wetland***
1. Excavation 0.02 Yes 0 forested
2. Excavation 0.01 Yes 0 forested
3. Excavation 0.01 Yes 0 forested

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, ctc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
" 100-Year floodplains are idenitiGed through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance: Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htt nl/\N N? \\'.1 cma_ ?-'ov.
*'* List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, boo, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.5 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.04 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Ire ct Perennial or
Intennittcnt?
specify)
1. Excavation 30 Hominy Swamp 50 ft. Perennial
2A. Excavation 20 Hominy Swamp 35 ft. Perennial
213. Excavation 20 U.T Hominy Swamp 20 fl. Perennial
3. Excavation 20 Hominy Swamp 20 ft. Perennial

` List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching straightening, cic. If strum relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream name can be found on USGS topographic maps_ If a strewn has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
do%nstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
u.?_' s??ov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., \v\\Nv.topo/onc.com,
mapquest.Com, etc.)-
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 90 ft.
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U. S.) below: There are no open water impacts proposed.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Watcrbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: nu, cxcavauon, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation A pond will not be created as a result of this project.
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
In an effort to avoid impacts the entire proiect is located as a parallel to the existing interceptor
to be replaced Hominy Swamp is crossed three (3) times but the crossing is necessary in order
to maintain the location and function of the existing sanitary sewer easements. Initially. ideally
each stream crossing was to be made by dry bore and jack operation However, due to problems
with infiltration from the stream this idea had to be abandoned for the open-cut method.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littt )://li2o.enr,state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm!ide.litml.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
All City of Wilson easements that border or include the existing Hominy Swamp stream
serve as a natural area and are not hindered by the interceptor's location nor function. The
final constructed project will maintain the character of the existing environment.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at littp://li2o.etir.state.nc.iis/xvrp/index.litm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 8680 square ft.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federaVstate) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,680 3 26,040
2 6,985 1.5
Total 15,665
* Zone I extends out 30 fast perpendicular from near bank: of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
The City of Wilson maintains all existing utility easements occupied by the existing
interceptor and the proposed 24" interceptor that will be utilized in this project.
XL Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
'downstream from the property.
This project is almost entirely pervious All sanitary sewer mains will be installed below round,
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All existing flows are tributary to the City of Wilson - Hominy Swamp WW. Treatment facility.
XI EL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ED
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
This project is underway. Although no stream crossings have been performed, a majority of the
remaining project is complete It is the wish of the City of Wilson, that approval be granted
soon, so as not to conflict with contract time periods and the need for a contract time extension
Mr. Barry Parks - Water Resources Director, City of Wilson, North Carolina
. 41
;24
Applicant/Agent's Signature . Dute
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
imap://[e-mail]:143/...
Subject: Re: City of Wilson Project, DWQ 05-0163
From Debbie Edwards <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:04:20 -0500
To: Landon Younce <[e-mail]>
CC: Cyndi Karoly <cyndi.karo ly@ncmai 1. net>, "joseph.k.yates" <[e-mail]>
Landon,
I left you a message earlier today responding to your voice mail and email. I am
leaving you an email because this needs to be resolved today, otherwise this
application may be rejected (expires 3/10/05). I believe you are getting the two
rules confused and I apologize if I added to the confusion. According to the Neuse
Buffer Rules, non-electric utility lines that cross a stream at an angle of less than
75 or greater than 105 degrees requires mitigation for Zone 1(impact 2), this does
not change the impacts to the "waters of the US/State". The actual footprint of
impacts to the "waters" should remain the same and therefore should be requested that
way within the PCN with the exception of the "second" channel impacts at impact #2,
this impact area should be broken down to show the 2 separate channel impacts (impact
2A and 2B). In addition, the Neuse Buffer Rule says that all parallel impacts to Zone
1 require mitigation (impact 1). Please revise the PCN to the original impacts to
the streams and include the impacts to the second channel at impact #2, this needs to
be emailed back to me today. Also, I need you to send the letter from the EEP
showing they will accept the buffer mitigation, if this is not possible then you
should contact the EEP and speak with Carol Shaw and maybe she can call/email me to
confirm. If you plan to keep the requested impacts the same for this project then an
additional $1000.00 check will be needed for the Express Review but realistically,
the DWQ would not approve 240 linear feet of impacts for 3 sewerline crossings and
most likely stream mitigation would be required as well. If you have any questions,
please call me at 919-733-9502.
thank you,
debbie
Landon Younce wrote:
Ms. Edwards,
I hope you had a chance to catch my voice message. If not, here were
our intentions. After conversation with you last week and taking a
thorough look at the site, we came to the conclusion that the buffer
impacts did need adjustment and were mostly increased due to the impacts
at crossing No. 1. Also, I am a little unclear on how the Division
interprets stream impacts. I believe I heard you say that on crossings
of less than 90 or greater than 105 degrees, the crossing would be
treated as if it had parallel impacts? That was the reason for the
increase in the stream impacts. If this is not the case, then we will
need to revise the LF back down to the original estimate. Each crossing
will only impact 20 LF or 30 LF respectively if you were directly in
line with the sewer itself. However, if standing on the bank and
looking at the crossing, the impacts would appear greater in terms of
bank of the stream, thus the 100 and 120 LF respectively. Please
advise.
Landon
WILSO PN: 99-002.1
GREEN ENGINEERING, P.L.L.C.
[phone]
[e-mail]
-----Original Message-----
From: Debbie Edwards [mailto:[e-mail]] Sent: Monday, March 07,
2005 4:42 PM
To: Landon Younce
Cc: joseph.k.yates; Crystal Ivey; Cyndi Karoly
Subject: City of Wilson Project, DWQ 05-0163
1 of 2 319/2005 2:16 PM
imap://[e-mail]:143/...
Mr. Younce,
I tried to contact you monday, March 7, 2005 about your most recent additional
information sent to the DWQ on March 4, 2005. In our last discussion we spoke
about the inaccurate riparian buffer impacts and the
fact that mitigation would be required for the Zone 1 impact for crossings #1 and
2#. In the re-submittal of the PCN you have increased the stream impacts from 70
linear feet to 240 linear feet. I can understand an increase in the impacts for
crossing #2, however the impacts should be separated for each stream (i.e. Impacts
2A and 2B) but
I believe they are excessive (20 linear feet to 100 linear feet?). I am
unclear as to why the impacts have changed for crossing #1, from 30 linear feet to
120 linear feet. I am schedule to be out of the office tuesday, March 8, 2005 all
day for and Express Review Training Session in Washington, NC. This project
expires thursday, March 10, 2005 so this issue needs to be cleared up by wednesday,
March 9, 2005 in order for me to issue a WQ Certification. Thank you,
Debbie
Crystal Ivey wrote:
Ms. Karoly,
The above attachment is being sent per Mr. Landon Younce's instructions. If you
have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Younce.
Thank you.
Crystal A. Ivey
Green Engineering, PLLC
303 North Goldsboro Street
Wilson, North Carolina 27893
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
Deborah Edwards
Environmental STPecialist III
401/?4etlands Unit.
2321 Crabtree 131vd.
Raleigh, NC 2760,1
[phone]
2 of 2 3/9/2005 2:16 PM

OF
OF W ATF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q
?
O
G t
Willi
R
J
S
G
?
i r.,
ecre
ary
am
oss
.
North Carolina De
UJ
D partment of Environment and Natural Resources
_
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
March 1, 2005
DWQ EXP No. 05-0163
Wilson County
page 1 of 2
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
City of Wilson
112 North Goldsboro Street
Wilson, NC 27894
Subject Property: City of Wilson-Wastewater System Improvements
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Sir or Madam:
On February 8, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated February 2,
2005 to impact 0.04 acres of wetlands, 70 feet of stream and 7,000 square feet (fC) of protected riparian
buffers to construct the proposed wastewater system improvements. On February 18, 2005, DWQ staff
met with Green Engineering and City of Wilson representatives to observe the locations of the proposed
sewerline impacts in the field. At this field meeting, DWQ staff observed proposed impacts to
jurisdictional waters and riparian buffers that were not included within the application that was submitted
and received on February 8, 2005. In addition, proposed parallel impacts to zone 1 & 2 of the riparian
buffer were also observed. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or
provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in
order to process your application to impact protected wetland, streams and/or buffers on the subject
property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have to move
toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and 213 .0233(8) and will place
this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the
following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information:
1. Please submit a revised Pre-Construction Notification Application (PCN) to include the additional
proposed impacts to the second channel at Impact location #2. In addition, Impact location #2
includes a proposed sewerline crossing that is greater than 105 degrees, this requires mitigation for
impacts to Zone 1, and at Impact location#1, parallel riparian buffer impacts are proposed, this also
requires mitigation for Zone 1, please make these revision to the PCN also.
2. Please contact Carol Shaw at the Ecosystem Enhancement Program to ensure that they will accept
the riparian buffer mitigation required for this project at [phone].
Please respond within three days of the date of this letter by sending this information to me via e-mail or
fax and a follow-up copy in writing. The Express Review Program is a process that requires all parties to
participate in a timely manner. If the DWQ feels the Express Review Program is the incorrect review
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Noy` Carolina
Nhrrally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
RECEIVED
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
EXPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: City of Wilson Fax #: [phone]
Landon Younce 252-243-7489
Subject: City of Wilson WW System Improvements Date:.-112$t65--
Number of pages including cover sheet: .213
Notes or special instructions:
The original will be sent in the mail. If you have questions please call Debbie Edwards at 919-733-9502.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: hun'//h2o.cnr.statc.ne.us/ncwctlands NatinvIly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10°o Past Consumer Paper
1
March 4, 2005
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality - Wetlands Unit
Parkvicw Building
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina. 27604
Attention: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
MAR 0 D
7 2005
` 6? TO?Q TER 61WO
SUBJECT: Additional Information Request
Express Permit Application Review
City of Wilson - Wastewater System Improvements
Hominy Swamp Gravity Sewer Extension
Wilson, North Carolina
PN: 99-002.1
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Please find the Revised Pre-Construction Notification application attached for your continued
review. The buffer mitigation for Zone 1 of Hominy Swamp as distributed throughout the two (2)
crossings comes to a total of 8,680 square feet. There are parallel impacts associated with Crossing No. 1
and Crossing No. 2, although impacts at those crossings are unavoidable. All stream and buffer areas will
be seeded and maintained by the City of Wilson as is standard maintenance for all of the City's utility
casements.
Also, please find attached copy of the letter addressed to Ms. Carol Shaw of the Ecosystem
Enhancement Program requesting inclusion of this project.
I trust this information is sufficient for your continued review and approval of this project. If you
should have any questions, please call.
Respectfully,
W. don ounce, P.E.
WLY
Enclosures: As stated.
cc: Kevin Yates - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Barry Parks - Water Resources Manager, City of Wilson, N.C.
GREEN ENGINEERING, PLLC
V:\Wo99\99002.1\Cyndi Kuolyltr(3-405).dm WATER, WASTEWATER SURVEYING, PLANNING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT 03/04/05
303 N. GOLDSBORO ST. PO BOX 609 WILSON N.C. 27893 TEL [phone] FAX [phone] WWW.GREENENGINr
March 4, 2005
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
NCEEP
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619
Attention: Ms. Carol Shaw
Program Assistant
SUBJECT: Request for Participation in Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Wastewater System Improvements
City of Wilson, North Carolina
PN: 99-002.1 DWQ EXP No. 05-0163
Dear Ms. Shaw:
The City of Wilson is pursuing an Express Permit to perform three (3) gravity sewer crossings of
Hominy Swamp in Wilson, North Carolina. This project was submitted to NCDENR - Division of Water
Quality and the US Army Corps of Engineers on February 2, 2005. The Express Permit Review process
was initiated mid-project due to a failure to perform the crossings by dry bore and jack method beneath
the strcambed. The bore pits provided a potential to flood and the presence of boulders in the streambed
at the crossing location prevented a successful boring operation.
This Express Permit request involves allowing the City to perform each of the three (3) crossings
by open-cut method through Hominy Swamp. Once approvals have been granted and an approved permit
is received, the required mitigation ratios can be applied and payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program, if allowed, can take place. Approximately 240 LF of stream impact and 8,680 square feet of
riparian buffer mitigation are necessary to complete the three (3) stream crossings.
Please find attached 8 %Z" x 11" copy of the USGS Quadrangle Map for the subject project area. I
trust this information is sufficient for your review and acceptance of this project into the Enhancement
Program.
If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call.
Respectfully,
W. Landon ounce, P.E.
WLY
Enclosures: As stated.
cc: Barry Parks - Water Resources Manager, City of Wilson, North Carolina
Ishwar Devkota - Division of Water Quality, Construction Grants and Loans Section
Cyndi Karoly - Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
GREEN ENGINEERING, PLLC
V:%Wo9709002.Ikud&haw•hr(34-05).dx WATER, WASTEWATER SURVEYING, PLANNING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT 0]/04/054:05 PM
303 N. GOLDSBORO ST. PO BOX 609 WILSON N.C. 27893 TEL [phone] FAX [phone] WWW.GREENENGINEERING.?OM
@gVgI
a!AR 0-q 2005
Office Use Only: vtEi1N_NR-V4 +N??TERBVICH Fonn Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: City of Wilson
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 10
Physical Address: 112 N. Goldsboro St.
Wilson, North Carolina 27894
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: W. Landon Younce, P.E.
Company Affiliation: Green Engineering P.L.L.C.
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 609
Physical Address: 303 N. Goldsboro St.
Wilson North Carolina 27893
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: 1 younce0a Preenenq.com
Fax Number: [phone]
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: City of Wilson -Wastewater System Improvements -Hominy Swamp
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):City of Wilson Easements/NCDOT Right of Way
4. Location
County: Wilson Nearest Town: Wilson
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Utility Easements along Hominy Swamp
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Beg i nning off of Ward Blvd.,
Extending to Canal Drive, and on to Ripley Drive, crossing Raleigh Raod US 264 Alt.),
Paralleling Hominy Swamp to Norfolk Southern Railroad just north of Elizabeth Road.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):see attached -Stream Crossing Summary
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 10.0 Acres (disturbed area within Right of Ways and easements)
7. Nearest body of water (stream river/sound/ocean/lake): Hominy Swamp
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at litt1)://li2o.etir.state.ne.us/a(imin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: existing conditions consist of an established easement
maintained by the City of Wilson for the purpose of providing sanitary sewer service. The
City has recently performed a stream restoration project in the area consisting of a portion of
the Hominy Swamp stream between Canal Drive and Raleigh Road.
Pap 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Proposed
24" Ductile Iron Sanitary Sewer Interceptor to be installed by backhoe. This project consists
of a parallel replacement interceptor system to reduce the increasing risk and affects of
inifiltration/inflow that has been present in the project service area for quite some time.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To provide a new interceptor to replace the
aging sewer collection in the area. Infiltration and Inflow has plagued this portion of the Citx
of Wilson's Interceptor for some time and conditions are growing worse. The new parallel
interceptor will provide adequate capacity as well as new materials, thereby adding life to the
system. No new sewer services area proposed as a result of this project.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
The City of Wilson's existing, sanitary sewer interceptor along Hominy Swamp predates the
1950's. It is doubtful that any records of state approval can be obtained at this time.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No, there are no future permit requests anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Stream and wetland characteristics
will not change as a result of this project. Project is underway. At onset of the first bore,
evidence of flooding the bore pit developed. The casing depth is too shallow to prevent influent
water from the creek into the bore and bore pit. Therefore open-cut method is proposed for all
three (3crossings of 24" gravity sewer. Casing will still be utilized in the open-cut process.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(,es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
1. Excavation 0.02 Yes 0 forested
2. Excavation 0.01 Yes 0 forested
3. Excavation 0.01 Yes 0 forested

' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
" 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service: Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httpl/" N? \%,. tcrtt,i. _ov.
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made: by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.5 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.04 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
T)pe of Impact* Lcngtlt of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(leasespecify)
1. Excavation 120 Hominy Swamp 50 ft. Perennial
2. Excavation 100 Hominy Swamp 35 ft. Perennial
3. Excavation 20 Hominy Swamp 20 R. Perennial

" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement µn11, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
N%.usTs.Lov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., \%\%\vtopoione.com,
Xv.mntxllest, con], etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 240
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U. S.) below: There are no open water impacts proposed.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma)

Type of Impact* Area of

Impact
(acres)
Name of Walcrbody
(if applicable) T)pe of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation A pond will not be created as a result of this project.
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
In an effort to avoid impacts the entire oroiect is located as a narallel to the existing interceptor
to be replaced. Hominy Swamp is crossed three (3) times but the crossing; is necessary in order
to maintain the location and function of the existing sanitary sewer easements. Initially, ideally
each stream crossing was to be made by dry bore and jack operation. However, due to problems
with infiltration from the stream, this idea had to be abandoned for the open-cut method.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littl):Hii2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm!;ide.litml.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
All City of Wilson easements that border or include the existing Hominy Swamp stream
serve as a natural area and are not hindered by the interceptor's location nor function. The
final constructed project will maintain the character of the existing environment.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at htt?)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.litm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 8680 square ft.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federaUstate) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* (squImpact are feet) Multiplier Mild cation
1 8,680 3 26,030
2 6,985 1.5
Total 15,665
' Zone 1 extends out 30 feat perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
The City of Wilson maintains all existing utility easements occupied by the existing
interceptor and the proposed 24" interceptor that will be utilized in this project.
XL Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
'downstream from the property.
This project is almost entirely pervious All sanitary sewer mains will be installed below ground.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All existing flows are tributary to the City of Wilson - Hominy Swamp WW. Treatment facility.
XIIL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No 2
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
This project is underway. Although no stream crossings have been performed- a. majority of the
remaining project is complete It is the wish of the City of Wilson, that approval be granted
soon so as not to conflict with contract time periods and the need for a contract time extension.
Mr. Barry Parks - Water Resources Director, City of Wilson, North Carolina
/.?
2. v,?-
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
March 4, 2005
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
NCEEP
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1619
Attention: Ms. Carol Shaw
Program Assistant
SUBJECT: Request for Participation in Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Wastewater System Improvements
City of Wilson, North Carolina
PN: 99-002.1 DWQ EXP No. 05-0163
Dear Ms. Shaw:
The City of Wilson is pursuing an Express Permit to perform three (3) gravity sewer crossings of
Hominy Swamp in Wilson, North Carolina. This project was submitted to NCDENR - Division of Water
Quality and the US Army Corps of Engineers on February 2, 2005. The Express Permit Review process
was initiated mid-project due to a failure to perform the crossings by dry bore and jack method beneath
the streambed. The bore pits provided a potential to flood and the presence of boulders in the streambed
at the crossing location prevented a successful boring operation.
This Express Permit request involves allowing the City to perform each of the three (3) crossings
by open-cut method through Hominy Swamp. Once approvals have been granted and an approved permit
is received, the required mitigation ratios can be applied and payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program, if allowed, can take place. Approximately 240 LF of stream impact and 8,680 square feet of
riparian buffer mitigation are necessary to complete the three (3) stream crossings.
Please find attached 8 %:" x 11" copy of the USGS Quadrangle Map for the subject project area. I
trust this information is sufficient for your review and acceptance of this project into the Enhancement
Program.
If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call.
I
Respectfully,
W. Landon ounce, P.E.
WLY
Enclosures: As stated.
cc: Barry Parks - Water Resources Manager, City of Wilson, North Carolina
Ishwar Devkota - Division of Water Quality, Construction Grants and Lams Section
Cyndi Karoly - Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
GREEN ENGINEERING, PLLC
V:1Wo9709002.I%cuo13uw-L-C14-P,doo WATER, WASTEWATER SURVEYING, PLANNING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT 03I0054.05PM
303 N. GOLDSBORO ST. PO BOX 609 WILSON N.C. 27893 TEL [phone] PAX 252.243.7489 WWW.GREENEN GI NEE RING.COM
Office Use Only: Form Vasion May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: City of Wilson
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 10
Physical Address: 112 N. Goldsboro St.
Wilson, North Carolina 27894
Telephone Number: (,252) 399-2461 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: W. Landon Younce, P.E.
Company Affiliation: Green Engineering, P.L.L.C.
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 609
Physical Address: 303 N. Goldsboro St.
Wilson. North Carolina 27893
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: I ounce ,,,greenenu.com
Page 5 of 12
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: City of Wilson -Wastewater System Improvements -Hominy Swamp
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIIN):City of Wilson Easements/NCDOT Right of Wa
4. Location
County: Wilson Nearest Town: Wilson
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Utility Easements along Homier Swamp
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Beginning off of Ward Blvd..
Extending to Canal Drive, and on to Ripley Drive crossing Raleigh Raod (US 264 Alt ),
Paralleling Hominy Swamp to Norfolk Southern Railroad just north of Elizabeth Road
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or LavLong):see attached -Stream Crossing Summary
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 10.0 Acres (disturbed area within Right of Ways and easements)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Hominy Swamp
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: existing conditions consist of an established easement
maintained by the City of Wilson for the purpose of providing anit sewer service The
City has recently performed a stream restoration project in the area consisting of a portion of
the Hominy Swamp stream between Canal Drive and Raleigh Road.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Proposed
24" Ductile Iron Sanitary Sewer Interceptor to be installed by backhoe. This project consists
of a parallel replacement interceptor system to reduce the increasing risk and affects of
inlfiltration/inflow that has been present in the project service area for quite some time.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To provide a new interceptor to replace the
aging sewer collection in the area. Infiltration and Inflow has plagued this portion of the City
of Wilson's Interceptor for some time and conditions are growing worse. The new parallel
interceptor will provide adequate capacity as well as new materials, thereby, adding life to the
system. No new sewer services area proposed as a result of this project.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
The City of Wilson's existing sanitary sewer interceptor along Hominy Swamp predates the
1950's. It is doubtful that any records of state approval can be obtained at this time.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Not there are no future permit requests anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:Stream and wetland characteristics
will not change as a result of this project. Project is underway. At onset of the first bore,
evidence of flooding the bore pit developed. The casing depth is too shallow to prevent influent
water from the creek into the bore and bore pit. Therefore open-cut method is proposed for all
three (3) crossings of 24" gravity sewer. Casing will still be utilized in the open-cut process.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplaia**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
ear feet)
Type of Wetland***
1. Excavation 0.02 Yes 0 forested
2. Excavation 0.01 Yes 0 forested
3. Excavation 0.01 Yes 0 forested

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(PTRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at l1ttp:/hvww. fcma. aov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wcdand, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.5 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.04 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
lease )
1. Excavation 120 Hominy Swamp 50 ft. Perennial
2. Excavation 100 Hominy Swamp 35 ft. Perennial
3. Excavation 20 Hominy Swamp 20 ft. Perennial

' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
wwwm-gs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., wuw.topozone.conl,
w1y1V.111, JC 11CSt.CO111, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 240 ft.
Page 8 of 12
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below: There are no open water impacts proposed.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but arc not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation A pond will not be created as a result of this project.
if construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., damfembankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
In an effort to avoid impacts the entire vroiect is located as a parallel to the existina interceptor
to be replaced. Hominy Swamp is crossed three (3) times but the crossing is necessary in order
to maintain the location and function of the existing sanitary sewer easements. Initially, idealix
each stream crossing was to be made by dry bore and jack operation. However, due to problems
with infiltration from the stream, this idea had to be abandoned for the open-cut method.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnn.gide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/Iinear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
All City of Wilson easements that border or include the existing Hominy Swamp stream
serve as a natural area and are not hindered by the interceptor's location nor function. The
final constructed project will maintain the character of the existing; environment.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 8680 square ft.
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
*
Zone Impact
(square feet)
Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 8,680 3 26,040
2 6,985 1.5
Total 15,665
• Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
The City of Wilson maintains all existing utility easements occupied by the existing
interceptor and the proposed 24" interceptor that will be utilized in this project.
XL Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
"downstream from the property.
This project is almost entirely pervious. All sanita!y sewer mains will be installed below ground.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All existing flows are tributary to the City of Wilson - Hominy Swamp WW. Treatment facility.
XIIL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
MV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species; accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
This project is underway. Although no stream crossings have been performed. a majority of the
remaining project is complete. It is the wish of the City of Wilson, that approval be granted
soon, so as not to conflict with contract time periods and the need for a contract time extension.
k4r. Barry Parks - Water Resources Director, City of Wilson, North Carolina
41
r
Applican(/Agent's Signature . Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
March 4, 2005
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality - Wetlands Unit
Parkview Building
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina. 27604
Attention: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
SUBJECT: Additional Information Request
Express Permit Application Review
City of Wilson - Wastewater System Improvements
Hominy Swamp Gravity Sewer Extension
Wilson, North Carolina
PN: 99-002.1
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Please find the Revised Pre-Construction Notification application attached for your continued
review. The buffer mitigation for Zone 1 of Hominy Swamp as distributed throughout the two (2)
crossings comes to a total of 8,680 square feet. There are parallel impacts associated with Crossing No. 1
and Crossing No. 2, although impacts at those crossings are unavoidable. All stream and buffer areas will
be seeded and maintained by the City of Wilson as is standard maintenance for all of the City's utility
easements.
Also, please find attached copy of the letter addressed to Ms. Carol Shaw of the Ecosystem
Enhancement Program requesting inclusion of this project.
I trust this information is sufficient for your continued review and approval of this project. If you
should have any questions, please call.
Respectfully,
i-
W. don ounce, P.E.
WLY
Enclosures: As stated.
cc: Kevin Yates - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Barry Parks - Water Resources Manager, City of Wilson, N.C.
GREEN ENGINEERING, PLLC
V:1Wo99\99002.1\C)mdiKarolylbro-405).dooWATER, WASTEWATER SURVEYING, PLANNING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT 03PoN05158PM
303 N. GOLDSBORO ST. PO BOX 609 WILSON N.C. 27893 TEL [phone] FAX [phone] WWW.GREENENrINEERING.COM
l4QF W ATF9Q
?
G Michael F. Easley, Governor
t
J
S
Willi
G
R
ecre
ary
oss
r.,
?
am
.
^
I North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
?
W`?
p .? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 21, 2005
DWQ EXP No. 05-0163
Wilson County
page 1 of 2
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
City of Wilson
112 North Goldsboro Street
Wilson, NC 27894
Subject Property: City of Wilson-Wastewater System Improvements
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION-EXPRESS REVIEFV PROGRAM
Dear Sir or Madam:
On February 8, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated February 2,
2005 to impact 0.04 acres of wetlands, 70 feet of stream and 7,000 square feet (ft) of protected riparian
buffers to construct the proposed wastewater system improvements. On February 18, 2005, DWQ staff
met with Green Engineering and City of Wilson representatives to observe the locations of the proposed
sewerline impacts in the field. At this field meeting, DWQ staff observed proposed impacts to
jurisdictional waters and riparian buffers that were not included within the application that was submitted
and received on February 8, 2005. In addition, proposed parallel impacts to zone 1 & 2 of the riparian
buffer were also observed. The DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or
provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in
order to process your application to impact protected wetland, streams and/or buffers on the subject
property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have to move
toward denial ofyour application as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 and 213 .0233(8) and will place
this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the
following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information:
1. Proposed impacts at location #2 are greater than 105 degrees and are proposed at a location crossing 2
jurisdictional channels. The application submitted did not include the proposed impacts to the second
channel. Please move or reconfigure the sewerline crossing at location #2 to minimize impacts to
riparian buffers and jurisdictional channels.
2. Proposed impacts at location #1 requests parallel impacts to zone 1 & 2 of the riparian buffer, the
application requests only impacts to zone 2. Parallel impacts to the riparian buffer in Zone 1 are an
-allowable with mitigation activity. Please move or reconfigure the sewerline to avoid zone 1 impacts.
In addition, an existing "drainage ditch" has been piped for a construction corridor to the sewerline,
there are additional riparian buffer impacts associated with this activity, these impacts need to be
included in your application.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]/ FAX [phone]/ Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.ncndsh2o.enr.state.ncnds
No One
Carolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
City of Wilson
Page 2 of 2
2/21/05
Please respond within three days of the date of this letter by sending this information to me via e-mail or
fax and a follow-up copy in writing. The Express Review Program is a process that requires all parties to
participate in a timely manner. If the DWQ feels the Express Review Program is the incorrect review
program for your project, then we may have to return your application and have it reviewed through our
regular 401 Water Quality Certification Program.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Deborah Edwards at [phone] if you have any
questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely, Q,
Cyn i Karoly,
Wetlands/401 Unit, DWQ.
CBK/dae
cc: Landon Younce-Green Engineering, 303 N. Goldsboro St., Wilson, NC 27893
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050163CityolnVilson(Wilson)EXP+hold
PAYMENI T
RECEIVED
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Emrironment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
L9?113e1 F. Easley. tioremor VIA arr, C. R;SS, Jr., SeLrstery
Wdn W. Klireek. P.E.. DireCtor
EXPRESS PEILN11T REV1ENV PROGRAM
Division or water Quality
Department or En-viromnental and Natural Resources
1Vetlands/401 Unit
Street Addr": 2321 Crabtree Doclevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604 2260
Malting Address: 1650 Mail Service Ccnter
Raleigh, NC 276.0-1650
Contact Information: Phone 0: 919.733-tl'U3
Fax d: 919-733-6393
Fax To: City of Wilson Fax #: [phone]
i.mtdon Younce 252-213-7439
subject: City of Wilson WW System Improvements Date: 1/29105
Number of pages including cover sheet: 2
Notes or special Instruct.iortc:
'll.c on?u]al will be sent in tic mail it you have yuwtiems please call Debbie wwmds at 919-733 9502.
rm •-,rn ud' One
I:la tJ'frrrl C?+kr.l.x::'rl..Ik?LJ?.a "-'S?I; 4
YaI G.c•+.'_s.r•dJ. $1. ?1-?a FA1lQt, ddf G7rr, a5(+ ND tiClar/folina
??t?f r?sll?
A+ tJ.JI CND 4?M:Jfr+u^n Ac.en 7 ryrd - `Ilw PeCKaa" ^.'L Yal Lar IJ'rl. ?4'+?
---Q3Z1IWSNV'd1 ZNaWflOOQ SNaOaU aO aOVd ,LSHIa
NO :
WOE :
trot ,00 :
6Z:£T 8Z-NKr :
Z/z :
68'VL£fi,ZZSZT6 :
S17f1Sa'd
EGOW
ZRIZ GHSaFtIIS
EWI,L luvis
SaDVd
aNOHd
£689££L6T6 - 'Ia,L
SQNwIMM-SMQ all3N
0£:£T IH,4 SOOZ-8Z-NVf aZKQ
NOIZ4 MN00 MIMS
YXVA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environmcnt and Natural Resources
Division of Water Duality
t.Tra:a„I r. Cult'. Govcmx V44M 0. R-S ,JL, Seoro,,y
Aae W. /Jisxa, RE, D ieclor
rxPRESS PERMIT REVIEW PROGRAM
DIvIslon of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Rmources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street .Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevafd, SuJtc 250
Rileigh, NC 27604-23(8
)ttuling Address: 16'-) -%Ul San'ice Censer
Raleigh, NC 27699 1650
Contact Information: Phone a: 919-7330203
Fua N: 919-733 6693
Fax To: City of Wilson Fax !f: 252-399-2453
Landon Younce 252-213-7489
Subject: City of Wilton WW System hn4uovenlents Date: 1128105
Number of pages including cover sheet: 2
Notes or special instructions:
The otipnal will lw seal in the tail. Ifyou have yuestiors please call Uebbichd%uds at 919-733-')502.
•.)1 V:YM VL fy+, R,ryl-.nlMrt--- --
IS JI'J Ss?+.. C,.w,, M.xyh.H ?,C,l.?r? TiNN 15',t) Me
STIQa:.1.: 9ule'.v C. 914 AmJ, •.,41p,lkm<`.Y?V Yiptf lo iCiirUllna
A.uw'Sli;lli9pf rA%i.L4:1GWJ, akmu: hu. •?'+..+. ?QJtirrnlly
.Y FJw? OyL.Yf.,'An,W4 Apc,lirv' - it'Y. 5nycw-1'178 P M Cuiwna Pvy,u
•••aHZ?TFISNK21s ZNaKfJO a ZN3O82i aO 2OVd Zs2i1,H
NO
w0a
„TV 100
LZ:£T 8Z-NKr
z/z
£SVZ66£ZSZT6
sLIMS12 i
SGOH
aRIZ aasdK`IH
a HIZ IUVIs
SBOVd
3NOHd
£689££L6T6 Z3s
sQNK1T,Tam-w5i a allVN
8Z:£T 2213 SOOZ-8Z-NVf siva
NOIRMNOO MIMS

L
DS-01103
February 7, 2005
North Carolina Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality - Wetlands Unit
Parkview Building
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Debbie Edwards
PA YA/1 E P11 T
RECEIVED
FEB S - 2005
SUBJECT: Express Permit Application Package "ERMOSAN sr R) TER QUALITY
City of Wilson - Wastewater System Improvements
Hominy Swamp Gravity Sewer Extension
Wilson, North Carolina
PN: 99-002.1
Dear Ms. Edwards:
On behalf of the City of Wilson, North Carolina, please find the following information
attached for your review and approval:
0 Pre-Construction Notification Application Form
0 Construction Drawing Sheets 1 of 6, 4 of 6, and 5 of 6
(showing proposed stream crossing locations in plan and profile)
0 Project Narrative with description of each stream crossing
0 8 '/z" x 11" copy of USGS Quadrangle with stream crossing locations
0 8 '/2" x 11" copy of Soils Survey with stream crossing locations
Also, please find attached check in the amount of $3,000.00 to cover the application fee.
I trust this information is sufficient. If you should have any questions, please call.
Respectfully,
ir
W. Lando ounce, P.E.
WLY
Enclosures: As stated.
GREEN ENGINEERING, PLLC
V.AWo991,99002.lWcbbiecdwardslt(2-7-05).doWATER, WASTEWATER SURVEYING, PLANNING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT 02'07/05 9:09ANE
303 N. GOLDSBORO ST. PO BOX 609 WILSON N.C. 27893 TEL [phone] FAX [phone] WWW.GREENENGINEERING.COM
Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No.
DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not
1. Processing
FEB €3 - 2001
DENR - WATER UUA! i1Y
ViVIR0 AND STORMWATER ERAM1I
Form Vcrsion May 2002
;- DILO
3
cable" or "N/A".)
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: City of Wilson
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 10
Physical Address: 112 N. Goldsboro St.
Wilson, North Carolina 27894
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: W. Landon Younce P.E.
Company Affiliation: Green Engineering P.L.L.C.
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 609
Physical Address: 303 N. Goldsboro St.
Wilson, North Carolina 27893
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Proposed
24" Ductile Iron Sanitary Sewer Interceptor to be installed by backhoe. This project consists
of a parallel replacement interceptor system to reduce the increasing risk and affects of
inifiltration/inflow that has been present in the project service area for quite some time.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To provide a new interceptor to replace the
aging sewer collection in the area. Infiltration and Inflow has plagued this portion of the City
of Wilson's Interceptor for some time and conditions are mowing worse. The new parallel
interceptor will provide adequate capacity as well as new materials, thereby adding life to the
system. No new sewer services area proposed as a result of this project.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
The City of Wilson's existing sanitary sewer interceptor along Hominy Swamp predates the
1950's. It is doubtful that any records of state approval can be obtained at this time.
R F. rr,-,l [ E 0 W r] 2_3
FEB 8 - 2005
III. Project Information
DENR - WATER QUALITY
VOW0 AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans'should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than I1 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: City of Wilson - Wastewater System Improvements - Hominy Swamp
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):City of Wilson Easements/NCDOT Right of Way
4. Location
County: Wilson Nearest Town: Wilson
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Utility Easements along Hominy Swamp
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Beg i nning off of Ward Blvd.,
Extending to Canal Drive and on to Ripley Drive crossing Raleigh Raod (LJS 264 Alt.),
Paralleling Hominy Swamp to Norfolk Southern Railroad just north of Elizabeth Road.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):see attached - Stream Crossing, Summary
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 10.0 Acres (disturbed area within Right of Ways and easements)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Hominy Swamp
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/?naps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: existing conditions consist of an established easement
maintained by the City of Wilson for the purpose of providing sanitary sewer service. The
City has recently performed a stream restoration project in the area consisting of a portion of
the Hominy Swamp stream between Canal Drive and Raleigh Road.
Page 6 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Stream and wetland characteristics
will not change as a result of this project Project is underway. At onset of the first bore,
evidence of flooding; the bore pit developed The casing depth is too shallow to prevent influent
water from the creek into the bore and bore pit Therefore open-cut method is proposed for all
three ( crossings of 24" gravity sewer. Casing will still be utilized in the open-cut process.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
1. Excavation 0.02 Yes 0 forested
2. Excavation 0.01 Yes 0 forested
3. Excavation 0.01 Yes 0 forested

' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
•' 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at helix//\? N? Nv. fchin. cov.
*•' List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshvutcr/salhvatcr marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.5 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.04 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Im et Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please sif )
1. Excavation 30 Hominy Swamp 40 ft. Perennial
2. Excavation 20 Hominy Swamp 35 ft. Perennial
3. Excavation 20 Hominy Swamp 20 fl. Perennial

• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated np-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and alter, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
x%Nv.us,s.,ov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., x ww.topozollexom,
etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all stre ?,: L: ?? 0 ft.
v
FEB 8 - 2005
Page 8 of 12
lfFU4 SAND STORINA ER BTMRANCH
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below: There are no open water impacts proposed.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres)
)
Name Watcrbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Pond Creation A pond will not be created as a result of this project.
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
In an effort to avoid impacts the entire project is located as a parallel to the existing interceptor
to be replaced Hominy Swamp is crossed three (3) times but the crossing is necessary in order
to maintain the location and function of the existin., sanitary sewer easements. Initially, ideally
each stream crossing was to be made by dry bore and jack operation However, due to problems
with infiltration from the stream this idea had to be abandoned for the open-cut method.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams. p ??r-_-?-r--M
Page 9 of 12 FEB
DENR - V4, ,
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
litt1):Hli2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetIands/strmcride.litml.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
All City of Wilson easements that border or include the existing Hominy Swamp stream
serve as a natural area and are not hindered by the interceptor `s location nor function. The
final constructed project will maintain the character of the existing environment.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at littp://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/xvrl)/index.litm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
wig
Page 10 of 12 F E8 ?,-,v
DtiNR.Ws'?p M`?P?ER6t?;?aGH
vie p 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 4,200 3
2 2,800 1.5
Total 7,000
• Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Lone Z extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1. U [g ? ,-??
L` , j J`
FES 9 - 2005
DENR - WATER QUAD TV
Eg ui-6SAND STORMATER Btud4CH
Page 11 of 12

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
The City of Wilson maintains all existing utility easements occupied by the existing
interceptor and the proposed 24" interceptor that will be utilized in this project.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
This project is almost entirely pervious All sanitary sewer mains will be installed below ground.
XU. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All existing flows are tributary to the City of Wilson - Hominy Swamp WW. Treatment facility.
XM. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
ty of the
This project is underway. Although no stream crossings have been performed, a majori
remaining project is complete It is the wish of the City of Wilson that approval be granted
soon so as not to conflict with contract time periods and the need for a contract time extension.
Mr. Barry Parks - Water Resources Director, City of Wilson, North Carolina

??_ ®,5--
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter epplr vided.)
Page 12 of 12 r? ` OQ5
DENR - VVA •.
V1-r7 @SA(:DSTGrN,irinicat ;?'atiCH
DEC.1312002 10:47 919 876 5823
USACE RAL REG
LI.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Action ID: 200220221
Wilmington District
County
Wilson
#0296 P.001/001
FIL E copy
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Authorized
Owner- City of Wilson Agent Green Engineering, P.L.L.C.
Attn: W. Landon Younce
Address P.O. Box 10 Address- P.O. Box 609
112 North Goldsboro Street T 303 North Goldsboro Street
Wilson, NC 27894 _ Wilson, NC 27893
Telephone Number 252-399-2461 Telephone Number 252-237-5365
Size and Location of property (waterbodv, lii,-hway uunic/number, town, etc.): The impact area for
the proposed wastewater system improvements is located on the west side of U.S. 264/58, south of U.S.
Hwy 301, in Wilson, Wilson County, North Carolina.
Description of .Activity: 3'ltis permit authorizes excavation associated with the installation of a utility
line through an unnamed tributary of Hominy Swamp. 'T'emporary impacts to waters authorized by this
permit are 10 linear feet (0.006 acres) of'slreurn channel. All other crossings will be directionally drilled.
Applicable Law: X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number
12 Nation"ide Permit Number
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may
subject the permtittec to a stop work order, a restoration order. and/or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Rcgionaal General Permit or Nationwide Permit verification does not
relieve the peramittee of the responsibility to obtain away other required Federal, State, or local
approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before
beginning work. If you have any questions regatrding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact Amanda D. Jones at telephone number (919) 876 - 8441 extension 30
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date November 30, 2001 --_.-_ Expiration Date, - November 30, 2003
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELtNI-:ATlO Fg -Mil BE AT'T'ACHED
TO THE YELLOW (FILE) COPY OF 7'1tIS FORM, It Itt:(2t! 'F ?V T ,?
FEB 8 .- 2005
RECENED
U EC 1 3 2002
OENR-VDATER QUALITY
,`,°,1WJ03N1DSMJ NATERBRAI;rti
GREEN ENGINEERWG, P.L.L.C.
0 vJATFR Michael F. Easley
QG Governor
0 William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Q -? Alan . Division of Wa ©r QDirector
uality
July 2, 2002
RECEIVEL.I DWQ Project # 01-1527
Wilson County
City of Wilson JUL 1 0 2002
c/o: Mr. Charles Pittman, Deputy City Manager U 2 Q?r=
Post Office Box 10 GREEN ENGINEERING, ? alt 2 LI D
112 N. Goldsboro St.
Wilson, NC 27894 FEB B - 2005
Subject Property: City of Wilson - Wastewater Reclamation/Reuse ExtensLq,t 1-W TOER QUALITY
Parts A, B, and C; PN: 99-002 MrUNDS AND Hominy Swamp [03-04-07; 27-86-8; C Sw NSWj
APPROVAL of. Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B
.0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Pittman:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 10 feet of
Intermittent stream and 5,400 square feet of riparian buffers to install the proposed sewer system within the
existing sewer-system easement as described within your application dated October 10, 2001 and received by
the Wetlands / 401 Unit dated June 20, 2002. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill
is covered by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification Number 3.374. This
Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit No. 12 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected
Neuse River Buffers as required under 15A NCAC 2B.0233(8). In addition, you should get or otherwise
comply with any other federal; state and local requirements before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control PermitLWater Supply and Non-Discharge.. Also, this.
approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General
Certificailon.
This approval is only valid- for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified
below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.
If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and Is .
thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or In the future) exceed
one acre of wetland or 150 feet stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described In 15A NCAC
:91-11.0506(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed In the DWQ General Water
Quality Certification No. 3374 and any conditions listed below.'
Conditions:
1. The sewer system shall comply with the Non-Discharge Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0200).
2. Upon *completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules,
and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached. certificate of completion
to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
North Carolina Division of Wator Quality, 401 wotlands tlon Unit,
1650 Maq sorvtco Contor, Ralolgh, NO 27699.1650 ( Addroas)
2321 Crabtroo Blvd., Raloiph, NO 27604-2260 (l.4cctfa?)
fl1f1.733-1786 (phono), ©JG-7334893 (fa4. http/iEi2pAm to.n_ushxwodarxW
08;24;01 FRI 14:09 FAX [phone] GREEN ENGINEERING 10002
State of North Carolina RECEIV6
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality SEF ? 3 200!
WATERSHED CLASSIFICATION ATTACHMEI"ENG1NGMNG,Pj.LC.
Any changes made to this form will result in the application being returned.
(THIS FORM MA Y BE I-VOT000PIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
INSTRUCTIONS:
To determine the classification of the watershed(s) in which the subject project will be located, you are required to
submit this form, with Items 1 through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division of Water Quality Regional Office
Water Quality Supervisor (see Page 2 of 2) prior to submittal of the application for review. At a minimum, you must
include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a. 7.5-minute USGS Topographic Map that shows the surface waters
immediately downslope of the project, You r lust identify the location of the project and the closest downslope
surface waters (waters for which you are requc:,ting the classification) on the submitted map copy. If the facility is
located in the Neuse River Basin, also include a copy of the soil survey map for the project location. The
corresponding non-discharge application may not be submitted until this form is completed by the appropriate
regional office and included with the submittal.
Applicant's name (name of the municipality, corporation, individual, etc.): _ City of Wilson, N C.
Charles W. Pittman - Deputy City Manager
2. Name and complete address of applicant: Citv of Wilson, North Carolina
oldsboro Street, Post Office Box 10
City: Wilson - State: N, C. Zip: 27894-0010
Telephone number: ( 252 ) 399-23001 Facsimile number: ( 252 ) 291-9267
3. Project name (name of the subdivision, facility or establishment, etc.): Wastewater System Improvements
City of Wilson, North Carolina
4, County where project is located: _ Wilson County
5. Name(s) of closest surface waters: _ Hominy Swamp
6. River basin(s) in which the project is located: Neuse River Basin
7, Topographic map name and date: Wilson. N C. 1978
8. North Carolina
if @ M, q i 1 018 > ,ignature, and date: - ?M_t)
?. FEB B - 2005
1??•rCp ?UAI-I I T ?'Y?.II -' ?g) •/ O ? f
N
TO: REGIONAL OFFICE WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR -.,?F0 GR
Please provide me with the classification(s) of the surface waters, watershed(s), an2'a'V? piiate river basin(s) where
these activities will occur, as identified on the attaclied map segment:
Name(s) of surface waters and river basin(s): W -O "niit 5 W Z =14PU 140
Classification(s) (as established by the EAIC): 60J 5 -d 'Z7-- S6-15
Proposed classification(s), if applicable: _
River basin buffer rules, if applicable: -LUt?e?S/i?
Signature of regional office personnel:O Date: T/5?0
?
FORM: WSCA 10/99 Page 1 of 2
PROJECT NARRATIVE
STREAM CROSSING SUMMARY
CITY OF WILSON WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
WILSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
p
Rp=?OW[Ei ?C
FEB 8 - 2005
Project Description
DENR - WATER QUALITY
The purpose of this project is to upgrade a portion of the exisD i'avi?y sewer RAt?eti
interceptor along Hominy Swamp. The project will include construction of
approximately 7,600 LF 24" ? gravity sewer along Hominy Swamp, a parallel
replacement of the existing 15" ? interceptor long overdue for repair. The project is
located in the City of Wilson and will be constructed within the rights-of-way of the
following roadways: U.S. Hwy. 264-Raleigh Road, Canal Drive, and Ripley Drive. The
project will also cross under the existing Norfolk Southern Railroad right-of-way at its
southernmost extents. The total project area is approximately 10.0 acres.
Stream Crossinf* Locations
There are three (3) stream crossing locations on this project. All three crossings
will take place under Hominy Swamp and will be open-cut construction (dry bore & jack
method has proved futile - construction ceased as soon as the proposed bore pit flooded).
Existing stream characteristics will be restored upon completion of each of these
crossings.
Stream Crossing #1
Stream Crossing No. 1 is by 36" ? steel casing with 24" ? ductile iron carrier pipe
and is found on Sheet 1 of 8 Construction Plans.
Location Coordinates: Latitude 35° 43' 45.70", Longitude 77° 55' 40.75"
Stream Crossing #2
Stream Crossing No. 2 is by 36" ? steel casing with 24" ? ductile iron carrier pipe
and is found on Sheet 4 of 6 Construction Plans.
Location Coordinates: Latitude 35° 44' 17.72" , Longitude 77° 55' 45.05"
Stream Crossing #3
Stream Crossing No. 3 is by 36" ? steel casing with 24" ? ductile iron carrier pipe
and is found on Sheet 5 of 6 Construction Plans.
Location Coordinates: Latitude 35°44' 34.46", Longitude 77° 56' 01.26"
VAWOM9002Tstrcarn crossing nar.doc 02101105 2:56 PM
L1=,YAK11V11LIV1 W4 NA J Kr.?tlifwl
AND COMMUNITY -LOPMENT
RALEIGH, NORTn t:HROLINA
,33 5455 /V SW
fN74'37-.:AD C17..SMnAD91 2)f,
FEB 8 - 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
n 11111ATC G£R Q td(:l-? G

I- All, TO U.S. 64
_
'bbGWOOD L-

I
-+ I ??J? III /,tt. ,
More
Pa I
__. ??\ \;\ •?

°L ?'?? ?? .1
111 ?T? ?1?'!tl- Il3f?M l.n "v
? ?• .?

J .?•? I,)
? ? JJ .ti M1 ::J
\` I I?.

_l .?? i ( 3
? h ?.
?
?

6 j
•J
\? i L \pN
? ??
N (O? 1
? i
Sch

1_ _ I
I
i.- tv 'cam /3/ ) l ?; -

I
?
?
_
i
I '
_
I
45
•?
? '? S7flE
' ? ??

n 11 ? PEA
ff
44 TREE RD 1 ?
' ? ? ? e/

i (
/50
?

I
I ' communit

Center ? ?

\
\
• .
_ ?taE p ehr 'at, '

\

- e
B

Raleigh r?\ •- j \
. ? / ??
1' \ ?10? T.
?.? ?? `, ??
? ??
apl j ilt i?

_

1183

C` j

/
%
? 11 F( n?
?.? _ --_ - I 5 •• ,? 130
• - i/??.

n

II ?

r----
WQOD Rlyf 1 ? 1

41
O 1 ?
_

? (, \
••O • O ?) ~? Libre

? - 0
rm
? ?
` o
' ?
? I ' ?) I. ? I J
c i P 1
?
\\\. ,? ?\ ?,? PO•
"1? ??? ?
)?'•
? '

•I _j

•?i w 6PNE -

d
• 7WRO,?

on-By.
um

= O

t
O
vX 6.
1Ce l I ???ti

r

1
an
Sc
°x"
50 { ??•
FI
i J
l O

`
Ozl
e
S . o% f \ j?-•n` _?
h° ?? _•? V\t ?:.?.??rC_-.i ,?•
?• ?~ t ?m•1•? \ ? 1 \I?? / _
G `\?? LJM .i ?„ to
!SCtLl{/ t
_

/
Z. S

1 ` ?'
•? aJ,
•?

?" 1163 / I Sc •

[vie ch
St6j
S

2 _
\.•
' f:
?R

1i

? I

? w Drive-In ii
heater 1- • ?•
? Patterson
Chap 3
l
Imo.. ?;
-?
?- ,
-
in6 Is

1
•
r ZCemp
e ' 134 Q O l ,
e

'\ . ° tgo •'1• ??County J 0 / ?
Fil do 4 .1000
•J \\ / 7
)f / • ?Y
? j f \
{ (??\ i?
flo1J {! l t a VON o?a`??" rs
VoJ ? m .Z83? 3C• ??,. , ? floN I• { Vofl ? ?,- VtS rl ?, ? ?l
busy Jn '? 9oN t°? .t slit o s <;I
as LU79 5i?r .
9091 in, _ ON l VON ol: ;! V35? . 'ry?y
1 I isez 4, r
°s° fl?N A d gnN 1 tAc 1 SQati •?
in in GES7)
1' a ) alr1? nt r.,.c . r' GAV '.1 421 VeV it
! Oar. r t O flog
}' f.. W6O ! i? ? ' .r - /{ '? E9t - SflrVJ'..r 3lrni`•} P `
r ) Z b? A cµ n? r JY? : r n i
1 I ? 1 ? .tV •?
tk: ,t i n a • '... Jni t; -r-., n? Y ou
L in
y?, '?,t ?'? '!r ?' I r ? :i.! ?_;f „A J "Jn, ? •? v a?ICG+)•? ?, ? ?i'
VdJ' t r. 'r 4a ?8 .. c , , L1.
t :< '' ? :'r •,? { ? rt ; ?'ab
.,? ?• ?? a n?• ? ,+ Zs : .,.a Wit; ,,.rr +' ,ax3 i ZQ3
i t: q„ s .?r M f
fry Jn, in p.,- f •? l ? - „;'a6 .?nu 13 k -rrta,'. a _''- VAV
,s9t1 ?.E
'i ~ ?• bib
"?.?l?., f lt,.r. a T .i/. •? C .Z.. E,??•.-sr; ''{?' 1L r;., •? Jn" kr 92'/ ' ??
L T r?' i r
13 ED) Y'• n Jn A? i i$ r? , w r?).]': in
?"'. •. '? •?? '?/? ? 8AN '?? 7 i r? .,IyY ..ar. ????...? ? s a ? s? s}t?? ? ;.?
?' .td '•r t' Y?• Iadd?4 ?, ff't•i1,:?
7 i I `C ?y to -'y ft r! ry?'• i ? ){d? 'n? I •? ? ?L ? ^ ,
A.A x r d .f tt?t'. ^• 411' > nra QZ1 -N ij h A te{ e t T Ayi
I r N ,', P f ?C L VOO E{F?? -
/ .... rc ? ? +-r? b? ?: i .?, ?; 4• 4t,???. a r?ti?`, ?•?,? a ?t
9 2i /. i •4 •,: r , ??? '? ? ? ; 'C ?" t ? Nr ` ?? 3F'tt " ?-+ .? ;, ` ,,, _
of I •i?i 8nN ! •? ? ? w? Nii y _ t ? .? k' yoS t
• w ?? a S
np%
s ( nn 0, f.]'7't?`j ty?! ©oyrv? ' ??n??r` l}? El'
y a 1 v 'ry-G t1 J+• ; ? ? . n? ? ? ?, JAM, C°??t?tJ1r?";-e' `? ! .3 ? , f pt7 ? ?;'"). '?? ? . M.i , tngeJ 1
b ''? x. 'ti, ., hJ? `7?,? 1 1'' ?.._ afc?y s•.. ..r, Y Lw , _ ?I1` a _ y`^?1
Y a. d. ?1!1 ?.. ?? r': :iCr.1d T
a .fr q8 •...,?, .,ice -? J r, r?_ iA1. a ..,w 1 w tW.> ro axe' i•/' ,^'t E . (I VOq
? ? r ? f r X3113*vr? '? :'? ? +
'' ? ar +? ,,,t+ '? c l?` ?1, n?.r, f-.?i3,?? ?} t ?. l ? 4 ? ' .?' . ? i tt r ? $? ? . .•, Ze1rJ
t tii ?? •?PNr?'.x;?». -:1. i'i(; M °`''? °' ? ? - ? t1 ''',?1.,`-? r ,+,` W ?. -?4? ? 4?.1•s: Z±
31ri`?`rf. .ia? ?s_!'`'? y'T'' `?? l i l? r s ?• •N
wd?.: •i ???, ?? ?`'" •?.? x,? ? c ?_ X'
S ?' a. <~ T??? t +.: 1 n . { ?; ?" ?`,. t - G.•t ?r • fi e?` ?} ? ? r/ ',_, ? r•° It { j ,.-v ??Y•?•'? t r 1
+?, t• ; boy / d ? F i `?? ¦t .? e ? 4" ' ???????? t:Ct..L. T? ?
HM ,? vaV o ea - ; rd atlas 'f.i . t tr ;? .kT,?
? k. 6P 1 l ' .n? i - j' " ? ,???'yr'" k ?il• v, n y N 1? ?Y? . ?r?.r.? ,. • ? -.
1J' ? "?'?.,ti. ? , ' ?"?li 9€! 8?W •. ?c Y}1idD; •; 4 ? •i ;?I; tom` N '• ? ? w. 4. ? ? -,.
oN (k laays suior) Voo
P
HOMB aRYWI 0ls atN S014V MA
rlllldflD a31VM - UtJ30
5002 - S 033
Q ?l?? zl a i
NC DENR - DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS/401 UNIT
2321 CRABTREE BOULEVARD, SUITE 250
RALEIGH, NC 27604
STED + 6i !? FED 01 (iJ
:T
W: Landon Younce, PE- Green Engineering,
PLLC,
303 N. Gc A ? INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS
C ? ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN ? OTHER
Wilson, N ? NO SUCH NUMBER/ STREET
S (?1 NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED/t.
UNABLE TO FORWARD
>Ii ??FIy"{?w:sir"'3%'??j.j:?:fj''?'?'I•?9•... ;!!?.;?fIII?3?1!i?l!I31ii!l1111{lilf?i?lillili:i?tll?litlll?If?
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
LISPS '
Permit No: G-10
0% 1ii#3fI333 3i 3F i1Iiii1fii1fill 3iiIddlfiiillfiti1iiii33?:1131
¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
¦ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to. you.
¦ Attach this cans to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
City of Wilson
112 North Goldsboro Street
Wilson, NC 27894
DWQ# 05-0163 - Wilson
B. Received ipy (frinted Name) q Date of Deliver
D. Is delivery a event fro em ? Yes
if YES, enter de 4 %hm%b ? No
3. Service Type
Certified Mail ? Express Mail
Registered V Return Receipt for Merchandisi
? Insured.Mail 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
? Yes
2. Article Number - -- - - - --
(Transfer from service fabeq 7004 2 510 0006 3351 6986
"Io,4
- - -
CITY OF WILSON
I
WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEM WILSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLIf CWB PROJECT No. E-SRG-T-00-0095 I
CONTRACT NU.1 -GRAVITY SEWER/RECL PART A HOMINY SWAMP INTERCEP PART B RECLAIMED WATER MAINS
~2
~ ~ ¦
$y
~ SMARPSBURG Q•
h~
d
T
Cliftonvills CoEbs
O G S Ci
~oF -w, O Town Creek
C) ~
F ~l ELM cm ~
MAYOR C. Bruce Rase \ y , o\ M
Newhcpe ~ n
Q Dunn Croawoode O
I ~
COUNCIL MEMBERS ~ r~ ]Ot y
E l 4'wnJ~n ~ IU f+~Ni~~f'J Lurnm Wilson uoproua~ -
Airport Roeeoua SIMS Thornt's
Avant P. Coleman ~ _ 'I~m Gwen C. Bu,~ton o-~o ~ _ , ..m. Crop/W0e ~`i gnpgprSrilk ~ PAi1T A ~.J _
r'
wao~ a
Stotts ~ ~ Croeeroada r
Q ~ ~
11 ~ ~
Noble G. Bl~.ckman, N ~ T F{ c~ ~ PAfR B 0
~ WATB91~IM16 ti
~Imoro
no~oena Croeeroada
James M. J~~hnson, III
r O Onvero 11 ~i l
~t G stop
Donald I. Evans ~ ~ ~~oJ Robert L. Th,~xton = o ~:~;gy~
~ Scotto ''`r,',.". ,
~ . a.
`-'lambs ~ ~ Croeeroada ixle ~ ~
Y Q Moorae X01 „ Croeeroada Evdrudole SnitATtri,a
Willie J. Pitt N / CITY MANAGER z~
117 U
LUCAMA
11 y
;,~rt~ew h
BLACK ~ rcock ,101 CREEK
using J
U
Edward A. Wyatt ~
L
STAMON58L 2G '+rt
117 ~ ` ~
DEPUTY CITY MANAGER ~ ~
61 L
11
Charles W. Dittman, III ~~E~ n ~ 0
~0 117 6~, e~
~O ~
~ W A Y N~ C O U N T Y o
~ G f
GREEN ENGINEERING 1
WATER, WASTEWATER SURVEYING, PLAkNING, PfiQ1ECT MANAGEMENT O
300 K DOLD8BOR0 ST. P.O. BOX 6Cr9 WILSON, N.C. 27893 rrcuv i to FEB 7 2045
.C,
LOCATION SKETCH
RACK
CC )S- o t ~,3 1R [phone] FAX [phone] OFFICE*C3REENEN4COM GfW&#*wiVPLL I J
cnssH eNCIHetwnG

EX. 20' SAN.
s~ xr I
1 EX. MANHOLE 6858 r 1 Rte. 1 I
1 1 TOP 106.37 1 r, /
INV. 95.39 IN 1 II r r INV. 95.29 OUT) 1 1 1 I
1 r I r
1 ' 1
r r , I
1 ~ TBM 2
1 ~ r ELEV. 110.94 r TBM 1
1 1 ELEV. 110.23 I
1 t ~ I EX. MANHOLE 6835 ~
OP 106. 1 0 7 4 STA. 12+36.
INV. 98.39 (OUi) ~ ~ A. 8+95.81
0 1 r RAU~aw ~ MANHOLE 7511 1 ~ 1 ~ p~ 2S' PROP. UTILITY SEW 9"'"-_-
EASEMENT EX. STORM DRAINAGE 1 ll~+ H ARC FlLTER BERM 0 EXIST. 42`i RCP ~ 2,~w 2~ ~ 2NSiW 2416A11 - I
1 x M(~ TOP 106.34 1 I SEE DETAILS -SHEET D1 OF 2
1 INV. 101.33 1 E~ J 1 I 1 _ _ - - - - - ~s\ - -iS16AN - - -+s~w - -,sew - V - - 4iT I
~ EX. S?+E1TER
I , ~ EX. 20' SAN ~ SEWER EASEYENf ~ • O
~ , . ~ 4~16M1 pQ,04 ~.._-151 ~ , 00 LF 38 i STEEL CASING _ _ _ _ - _ \ 25' PROP. mmmm~nmm~mm~nm,,.. r,m o
, 1 ~mrvmrmnmm Inmrnnn nnmrnnnrnr~,Lnrr~~rmm~mmmmnrnnrmnrnnrnmmmmnnnrrnnrmnr nmm 1 ` nrmoum„mmm,r,~,+r,,,m+urnn,+mm,nunrmrarmrmmrmnnnrnmm~nrmrmmnmmmnnmmnmmnnnmmnnnmm~rrmnwmrnmrm^nnn°'nn' \ UIILIT~ nrnr~r ~ ,rrrnr,~nr,nn,rnnr,nn, nm,mmn~„"n + ~ EASEMENT Q ~ ~ EX. MANHOLE 6881
1 r / ~ "",,,mn" ~X. BNIK OF H011 JIB ~ Q ~ ~ TOP 111.73 •~'"m
1 1 I r.---15~ 99. m~mu ~ ~ INV. 94.70 IN-80) ~ INV. 93.22 IN EX. MANHOL 6 ~ ~ ~
' ~ 4 i INLET of a. MANHOLE AND _ _ m„n _ _ _ _ _ ii3i mn„n.. ~ ) h TOP 111.41 ~ ~ INV. 93.15 OUT) ~ ~ ~
I r m 1 ~ n,mr"n" EX. 1 4 i OUTLET OF a. MANHOLE X8839 TO ~ ~ INV. 93.63 IN) Ez. 20' sw ~ ~ ~ INV. 93.56 OUT} 21~. ~ ~
mmn"'a / , i J ~ mn" SEWER GROUTED UP AND SEALED - / - SEWER EASEMENT ~ t
f '4,; Imn"" ~ 1 ' I f; s„ rtmmn / 1 ' ~ r~ m,mmrm / Qtr,.>.. 2
I X. MANN ~ Bu ~ . rlmmmnn EX. MANN 1 1 . 1 1
, / 1 ,n,,,m OLE 6860 ~ TOP 106.42 ZONE m~^ ~ \ a. MANHOLE 8881 SWILI. BE REMOVED AND T V
EX. MANHOLE 6836 INV. 94.73 IN) ~ ~ ' EX~ MANHOLE 9 OP 111.00 ~ 685 INV. 92.93 IN) PROPOSED 8 i DI SAN. SEWER SHALL BE TIED TOP 108.82 ~ INV. 94.66 OUT) / TOP 110.35 i INV. 92.85 OUT
INV. 97.60 10 ~ IN rml"""° ) / INV. IN T'^"" ~ TO a. 8 i OI SAN. SEWER. THIS CONNECTION EX. MANHOLE 6882
INV. 94.43 15 ~ IN I - ~yjSAN 92 62 ) , \ u INV. 92.26 4 4 IN ` INV. 92.76 OUT) ~ ~ SHAH. 8E MADE PON COMPLETION OF THE ~ 2 / TOP 106.17
INV. 92.05 24'~ OUT ,,`p ' \ PROPOSED 24 i SAN. SEWER. m INV. 99,48 IN) INV. 97,57 OUT)
Ex. 5 i INLET OF a. MANHOLE X8859 ~ . I ~ TOP 105.77 ' ~n,m,,,mmm"n"' \ \
1 I INV. 92.66 IN BE GROUTED UP AND SEAIED I „rr,,,,,,,,„nnl ~ L1YJii
, IINV.92.61 OUT) m""' \ \ 1 I 1 , ~ ~ UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANS ARE LOCATED All EXISTING WWtiOIES SHALL BE REMOVED
TM I ~ APPROXI6IATELY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE UPON COMPII:TION OF PROPOSED 24'I SAN.
ELEV. ios.4a 1 \ „ n TBM ~1 EROSION CONTROL NOTI a"i " ~ OFFER ' RAILROAD SPIKE IN 1 " P N ~ B, 2 i I E AT FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATK)W OF ALL EXISTI UTl • HG LmES SEWER EXISTING 15 ~ do 18'1 SAN. SEWER
~ SEEDING AND MULCHING r STA. = 11 ' VD MULCHING TO BE APPLIED WITHIN 15 AND SERVICES SHOWN ~ PLANS OR NOT. SHALL BE PERMANENTLY PLUGGED WHEN
n„„„, . , , +79.93 (37 LT) ,n„pnrnn~m° " ~ „~"m'" E WORKING DAYS OR 3O E x,; \ R . ~ n„n,,,~,n,~ , 1 ,,,,m" , . g~FF.,. ELEVATION 110.23 IAYS OR 30 CALENDAR DAYS, WHICHEVER IS EXISTING 1~{MIHOLES ARE REMOVED. CONTACT `NC ONECALL AT 1-800-632-4949 FOR PHYSICAL
I „m"m OF NE 2 SHORTER, OF ALL LAND ~ 1 ~ , •r \ T8M ~2 1 ~ DF ALL LAND DISTURBING ACTMTIES NOT LOCATION OF D(ISTWG UT1LT~lES PRIOR TO CIDrr1STRUCTION.
~ 1 u s PREVIOUSLY STABILIZED. \ RAILROAD SPIKE IN 10 i PINE AT Ex. BAHK of 1 EX1 STORM as r sTABIUZEO.
H01~"f ~wwa 1 4 ~ STA. = 5+77.88 77.32' L ( ~ ~ 1o5.ss ~ s \ SILT FENCE TO BE INSI . CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RElAOVAI ANO . TO BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN OR AS DEEMED
I INV 99.75 ~ ~ 7 ELEVATION 110.94 NECESSARY BY VISUAL ~ REPl14CEwiENT OF EXISTING FACILmES IF OIAMAGED. r.~ BY VISUAL OBSERVATION.
Ex. 2o' 1 ~ \ SAN. sEWfR + _ TBM 3
I E~sEUENr ' , ~ \ \ LROJ10 SPIKE IN POWER POLE AT SILT FENCE CONTRACTOR SHALL T1E ALL EXISTING SERVICES, AS ' FOUND, INTO PROPOSED I~IWHOLE SERVICE ~~k
\ 0 STA. 0+89.12 (11.33 R'1') CONNECTIONS. EACH EXISTING
X.~ 7 1 ~ 110 LF 48`i STEEL A INLET PROTECTOR \ ELEV TION 108.40 srA. -1+06.1 DRY BORE dt JACK 'ECTOR SERVICE SHALL 8E RECONNECTED THE DAY IN WHICH THE EXISTING
~~Itt toP 1 os.83 \ ROCK CHECK DAM SERVICE IS DISTURBED. NO EXISTING SERVICE SHALL ~~r~ ~K DiAlrl O ~G; I,
S~IWI~I'ittl INV. 92.01 IN-24 i BE LEFT UNCONNECTED OVERNIGHT. ~
AREA INV. 91.97 OUT-24 \ \ \ ~ y ' 100 YR. ARC FlLTER BERM ~ INV. 92.21 (9!-PROP. 24 i) \ \ BASE FLOOD ELEV. 110.85 (OLD ELIZABETH ROAD) ~ BERM
~ \ , EXIS'T1NG CoNCRE1E APRON To BF 100 YR. BASE FL000 ELEV. = 111.50 (STATION 15+00)
RIPPED OUT TO PRaVIDE INLET \ \ \ LEGEND; SEE DETNL SEE DETAIL SHEET D2 OF 2.
j --1-- _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ 1
50'x20'xQ` lE1~ORAITY STONE _ - - - - - - - - - _ I _ _ _ _ _ r ~ ~ ~
_ C+OINSTRtjlr'Tk~i E1wTRMk~ . ~ ~ 1 i _ - t_-. t-.- Y.
120 _ - I - -
120
_ a i _
I ~ + a I I, - - ~ ~ - _ _ 1
_ - ~ - J
- t - _ _ - . _ _ ....;115 - -
115 - - x ~ - W
_ -
- - ~i - -------_i
r i~
110 _ ~X. G DE ~X-G DE -j r---- ~~0 - i
' \ ~ i 1
' ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ -
- _ i~ I - -r \ , i ~ I
f 1 1 - - ' - - - ~ I i
I 1 1 _ 105 - ~ 1 i
~ ~ 1 I II 1 i
1 - - 1 1 ~ 1 I - ~ - - - _j ~
- I 1 1 - 11 1- - I I
~ i 1 1 / 1 1 - - - J-. _ ~ j _-Y--_____-..-.__.~.._____-_-Y i
100 a 111 - _--__t r-.-___-- ____-....._Y.-.____.___ - - ~ r-_ 100 I
~ I
110 LF PROP. 48`i ~ ~ - - - I
-100 lF PROP. 38 i STEEL _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ CASING WITH 24'iDUCTILE ~i j -
- RON CARRIER PIPE CASING WITH 24 i DUCTILE ~ IRON CARRIER PIPE _ --r--
95 . _ . 24 ~ _ - .
. 2 `i DI EWER 0 0. X P P. 2 'i DI SAN. / DI SAN. EWER 0 0. z - ` - _ 95
_ _ 1
- _ _ , ~ I
i .-t.------ t....
. 2 `i DI SAN. 0 .08X - - - I i - - --j - ~ - - - _ _ _ ___-r _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ k
90 ~-f- ~ ~ 9Q r - - .
_ I t _ t- _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ i
N - ( ~ I -
1 - _ _ _ _ _ i
I ~ I - t---- - _ _ - ' ~ 85
~ s - t - - --t--- - _ - _ . _ _ - -
~ NZ ~ i ~ ~
n 15 - _ - - - - 'r I h F
~ - - - r _ ~ i i ~ r-
o rna ~ r ~ ~ - - N ~ - ' 1 N~ - ~ - - - _ + ~ , _ _ _ _ _ - ~ _
80 ~rn~ ~ ~ - _ r __r ~ _ - _ _ • _ _ _ _---t------ - - _ T_ - _ 80 i ~ ! 1
ZI ~N a ~
~ ~I 1 ~ ~ - ~ - - ~ - - - t _ - - _ _ - - ~ _ t . _ _ - -
x Z Z - - - - • _ _ _ _ __.t . _ ~ ------t - _ . _ _t ~
- _ _ - - 1 -1-- r
75 - - i - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ i ~ _ _ ~ 75
i
-1+00 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 8+00 7+00 8 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00
REVISION DATE BY DATE: JIBE =
GREEN ENGINEERING CITY OF WILSON SCALE PROJECT No: WILSO\99-002 F.B. ~ 682, 698
1 _ HORIZ. T • 50' CADFILE: 99002BM2.DWG
o way, wasTMATER sURVEYwo, RuwMc, PRWecT tiuwacZMEnrr WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS -CO 303 K aa_oeeoFlO sr. P.o. eox eoo wL80ri, PLC. 27e93 ASCII FILE: VERT. T ` S PLOT DATE: FEB. t , 2005 WLY
PART A -HOMINY SWAMP INTERCEP a ••P~FO ~GREfN TS (2W 'b7-.W FAX (?M) 243-74M MAP NO.
O~flOe~QOOf10flaCOlO WIVSANWVN11 NORTH ~ pO N A SHEET NO OF RACK
1~1\Jfl 1 fl C~1f1VL~11~11

i ALL EXISTI NG WWHOLES SWILL BE REMOVED UTILRIES SHOWN ON PLANS ARE LOGTED
' APPROXI UPON COIIPLETiON OF PROPOSED 24 ~ SAN. hiATELY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE
~i FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION OF ALL EX EXISTING 12 ~ do 18 ~ SAN. SEWER ISTING UTILITIES
0 i AND SERVICES WHETHER SHOWN ON SHALL BE PERf~IAPIENTLY PLl1GGED WHEN PLANS OR NOT.
i i EXISTING WWHOIFS ARE REMOVED.
EX. MANHOLE 7450 CONTACT 'NC ONECALL' AT 1-800-632-4949 FOR PFIYSK',AL
~ ~ - TOP 109.04 ~ INV. 99.28 IN) Ex. MANHOLE N7453 LOGTION OF EXISTING UTILRIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. TOP 108.68
~ ~ ' ~ , ~ INV. 99.24 OUT) INV. ss.s1 IN) CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REII~OVAL AND ANO ~IUI~CFIING TO BE APPLJED WITHIN 15
~ ~ ~ 30 x20 x8 TEIdiPORAR'Y STONE \ ~ _ X0.5: OOIt~~TRUC110N ENTRANCE INV, 99.89 oUT) REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING FACILl11ES IF WORKING DAYS OR 30 CALENDAR DAYS, WHK~HEVER IS DAMAGED.
\ B-B ~ ~ ~ 1b/SA11 1SrSAN ~ ibrSAN SHORTER, OF All LAND DISTURBING ACTMTIES NOT
\ roP o ~,D4 ' ~ EX. MANHOLE 7445 Ex ~M ~ - - - CONTRACTOR SWILL TIE ALL EXISTING A$ PREVIOUSLY STABILIZED. SERVICES,
` INV. 98.19 IN 2~ 21rSN! \ ~ ) FUND, INTO PROPOSED IdANHOIE SERVICE --s4r5w ~v CONNECTIONS. E+1CH EXISTIt~ SERVICE SFIALL BE ~T FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AS SFIOWN OR AS DEEMED
SON ~ \ EX ce + Ex NV. 98.12 OUT) F ~ x,107,12 , wtr / EXISTING WOODS IS UMR OF DISNRBANCE \ RECONNECTED THE DAY IN WHICH THE EXIS'i1NG NECESSARY BY VISUN. OBSERVATION.
2 \ \ t EX. MANHOLE X7448 eUF• / ~,~N wo 751 RBANCE ? \ SERVICE IS DISTURBED. NO EXlST1NG ~F ~ I
Z ~ F ~ \ TOP 108.33 q~'" ON ~ fR ~ ~ / F a INV. 98.94 IN) STA. 8+75.83 \ BE LEFT UNCONNECTED OVERNIGHT. SILT FENCE • • • • • •
~ 9 ~ ~ ~ t INV. 98.9D OUT) y~ UFF ? T P 107.14 ~ ~ ~ INLET PROTECTOR
FR I '9G. 8"~ / ~ 7 1 MIWH 71 ? \
INV. 98.03 19''11 $'~'A, ,}r~.7 1~ STA. 10+28.73= \ ROCK CHECK OAM ~
INV. 97.89 OUT 2 9 ~ ~.~~„w,~.,,.,w~,~,,,~~~u,,,,~.,~w~,~w~w,,,~,~~,y~,.,u,~,,,,,u.~,~,~,.~, ~W EX. MANHOLE 1311 ~a 9 PyyLL~„~„~~,ww„"""ww " „ ,~,~,w„°° ,,.,~„u~,~,„. N,,,,, ..,~,,,,~w, A. 0+00.00 CLYDE AVE. \ u m.umuuua.u+umu~uw.~°°,pO°„~u ..<.,a,,, 1 /
TOP 106.71 ~ S~~ TBM 4 M 1 . t~. TBM 4 \ Ex. MANHOLE 7455 LEGEND; $EE DETAIL SHEET D2 OF 2.
INV. 101. IN ~ B t 85 LF 38 +i CASING ,,~,~?~W~ . 26 15 4 , ELEV.107. K ,,,,,,,,~,,,,.,,,,,,,hn,~nnn„n,,,,mm~mn,~ ........_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,n,,,,,,,,,,,,n,,,,.,,,,,„ INV. 96.99 IN 24 m rrv.t _ _ INV. tos.te •~4 OP 110.12 ~~'SW h,~,~.~,"",,,,,,,,,,m„m,~,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,n,,,,.,,,,~,,,,.,,,,, ~ \ INV. 100.61 IN , M~ )
INV. 96.71 OUT 24 a) u~. • _ ~ _ _ _ _ 7 Ops ,u~ torso , INV. 100.54 OUT)
W,.. ~ STA, 4+83.18 i errs-- erw- - - erw- - - W`,WW 4 ~ s~ erw-._ as - . - acv. t oz.st \ \ , MIWHOLE 7518 _ _ I~{i _ o ~ ~
~ S v sTA o+oo. _ 4~ "aw \ 00
t' - ~ ~ ~ PINEWOOD DR. O
~ ~ '~,,,,8... EX. VENT
ti ~ . I ;:ten c ~ ~ • ~ ~~r, OF Ex. t216µ \ ~ 4 £ \
ZON n ° ` ~ / FLOWER BED E 1 ~ ~ ~ e?'~ ~ ~ BUFFER ~ ~ , Ex. ce ~ U ---t'~
\ n^"~ / TOP 108,67 i • m ~ ~ ~ ~ "_;r,, ~ ~ / qrv, toa.~s t EX. MANHOLE 7168 NHOLE 7168 ~ ~ \ ~
~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I --FT.t M~E 9ED ~ BUFFER ~ m _ ~ ~ t2rsur TOP 108.03 ~ ~A ~ ~ 8.03 ex,, , ~ ~ ,
~ ?4e Ex. ~ • ~ ~ ` z _erw- t2rs~w INV, 101.62 IN B"0) ~ t~ t INV. 99.90 IN) 1.62 IN B"0 ' x, ce ~ 2 Q 9.90 IN) urv, tos.3s tz'r ~
+D ~m ToP to~.tr ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ro 3 wv. tozas ~ ~ - ' ~t ~ 0 EX. INV. 99.94 OUT) \ 5 9,94 OUT ~ uw. to3.7e (z4'r ~
~ \ tZ1BAN ` , ~ MANHOLE 7125 3 ~ . - _ ) ~ ~ ~ . , EX. DI EX. I
I 1 Q Ex. INV. 99.60 IN) TOP 108.09 1< FLOWER BEO ~ INV. 1oe.41 12•r ~ ~~0 08.08 1 I INV. 104.82 ~ 6 \ 05.41 12'1 I
9N. IX, p _ - INV. 99.58 OUT) ~ ~ ~ / ~ .e ~ ~ I I EX. ~ \ \ J
C 1oo•~B EX. MANHOLE 6973 FLOWER BED 0 4 ~ fl ~ tr ~ EX. MANHOLE 7169 ~ Fl.owEtt ~ ~ ~ \ ' f rrv. 1 ~ \
INV. 101.13 (8 0) Fl.DWER ~ ~ , I INV. 98.24 IN) 0 I \ ~ Ex. p ' 101.73 r' J / INV. 100.17 IN) I \ \ ~ iov ios.lt-~..,,
FLOWER BED INV. 98.30 OUT) I I I INV ~ i ~ w,, urn. . 100.10 OUT) \ ~ ~ o2.s raise
I ~ 1 1 ~ Q ~ ~ \
1 I I r 1 I , 1 ~ EX. SAN SEWER \ ~ - 420' 0 1.95X / Ex. ~ \ a
I I ~ I l 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 4 ~ ~ f \ ~
I 1 B~' ~ / ~ B. \ a ~
I I 1 1 X. MANH 7 4 \ ~ ~ I ' ~
1 ~-----._L_ R~ EX. MANHOLE 6975 ~ . I - - - . - TOP 106.03 ~ ~ a+• INV. 101.60 IN 8"~) Ex. ~ aN ~ ~ !
TOP 109.24 INV. 100.94 IN) toP iob.a3 ~
INV. 1 o3.e3 (ouT) ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ INV. 100.93 OUTJ INV. io3.4s ~ i.
Q ~ BENCH IIIARK 1 ~ I B~ ~ B \ \ I I I
1 X ' CHISELED IN HEADWALL SOUTH OF o ~ I ~ o ~ ~ ~
KINCAID AVE. STA. = 1 +78.88.14.50 ~ , i ~
ELEVATION 107.00 ~ I ~ ~ EX. DRAINA I GE MANHOLE 7239
TBY 4 ~ ~ ~ , 100 YR. BASE FLOOD ELEV. = 112.50 (SOUTH OF KINCAID AVE.) , 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~R~' TOP 106.40
RNIROAD SPIKE IN POWER POLE. ` . ~ ~ / INV. 103.58 IN 12"0~
STA, = 9+82.78 104.85 100 YR. BASE FLOOD ELEV. = 112.75 (NORTH OF KINCAI AVE.) ~ ~ ~ . IVE.) ~ INV. 103.30 OU7 24 0) / ~ ~
ELEVATION 109.38 ~ ~ 100 YR. BASE FLOOD ELEV. = 113.90 ("*ATION 15+00) o I a EX. SAN SEWER
i ~ ~ ~ ~ 388' ®2.30X
I j I i ~
_ ~ ~ - i _ - - -
120
- - ~ i 120
M o - - ,
~ _ - - _ -----t--- -~_-rt-
t---- ~
- ~ I , r - - - - - - - -r -1` _ _
115 z , z - - - r - t- _ i ----t--__. 115
_ _
_--t--..___... - r- _ _ - - _ _ I
110 - - - - _ ---t--_._- 110
I ' ~ ~ ~
1---- - - - _ i - - ------t---- -
- I
105 ~ ~ , ~ - _ - r 1 f ~1 - ~ - ---t- _ _ - _ 1
_ ~ I I I 05 t
1 I _ I
I I - - - - - - - i II
- i ( i ------t
100 _ _ _ - - - J ~ ~ • - - 1----... , _ -
. 1 _ 100
• ~ o o. x PRO . 24 a I i t
- _
95 - _ _ ! I
~ I 95
- - i I
- - - -
- 90 _ - - - - - i i - - -
~ - _ - _ 90
I
N - t - I t - - - I
Z o - - - - - fi -rt- --a i ~ - - -T - - - -
. _ - - t--
~ W' ~v ---r N - L _ ~ r- ~ - t
II ~ to N ~ M
- - - - 1` - - t n n
~a,~ o~ ~ ~ - _ _ .g , 1 - ~ t
- o~o~ M M 1 ~ ~ I~In~ _ _ - Y ~ _ +o a t.
o,+o~~ N~ N I _ N - - - t eo
<a < <a a
~ <a _ ~ -
- ' - --t- - - ~
-
75 - I - -
T _ 75
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 8+00 7+00 8+00 •00 9+00 10+00 11+00 1 + - 2 00 13+00 14+00 15+00
REVISION DATE BY DATE: JUKE 2002
GREEN ENGINEERING CITY OF WILSON SCALE PROJECT No: WILSO\99-002
a ~ - WATB9, WASTEWATER, SURVEYM PLANIJING, PROJECT MANACEMEN'T WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS -CO 300 N QOL.DBBORO ST. P.O. BOX 800 WIL8OPl, KC. 2780 PART A -HOMINY SWAMP INTERCEPT CONSTRUCTION F.B. # 682, 698 HORIZ. T ¦ W CADFILE: 99002BU2.DWG
- CONTRACT No. VERT. T - S ASCII FILE:
RCEPTOR DRAWINGS PLOT DATE: FEB. 1, 2005 WLY 61AP NO.
a e~EO; GR ~.N 1a. (2W 237-5365 Fax (25Z 243-7489 ~moe•~e«,eno.oo~, WILSON COUNTY
SHEET NO. OF RACK NORTH CAROLINA

EROSION CONTROL NOTES: ~~IE ALL EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL BE REMOVED
UTIUI UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANS ARE LOCATED UPON COMPLETION OF PROPOSED 24'/ SAN.
SEEDING AND MULCHING TO BE APPLIED WfTHIN 15 APPF APPROXIMATELY. CONTRACTOR Stall BE RESPONSIBLE p(~NG 12'+i do 15'/ SAN. SEWER
WORKING DAYS OR 30 CALENDAR DV1YS, WHICHEVER IS FOR SHORTER, OF ALL LANO DISTURBING ACTMTiES NOT FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILmES BE PERMANENTLY PLUGGED WHEN
AND PREVK)USLY STABILIZED. AND SERVICES WHETHER SHOWN ON PLANS OR NOT. p~~ MANHOLES ARE REMOVED.
COM CONTACT 'NC ONECALL" AT 1-500-832-4949 FOR PHYSIGIL
SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN OR AS DEEMED LOCH I LOCATION OF EXISTING U11LmES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
x. NECESSARY BY VISUAL OBSERVATK)N. toeao
wv. ta.to C CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL AND
\ SILT FENCE t •-a • REPL \ REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING FACILRIES IF DAMAGED. ~ ~
\ \ INLET PROTECTOR
/ COM \ \ FOUL CONTRACTOR StIAL1 TIE ALL EXISTING SERVICES AS ~ FOUND INTO PROPOSED MANHOLE SERVICE ~
~ ROCK CHECK OAM O \ \ CONS CONNECTIONS. EACH EXISTING SERVICE SHALL BE
\ ~ RECC \ ~ LEGEND: SEE DETAIL SHEET D2 OF 2. Shy RECONNECTED THE DAY IN WHICH THE EXISTING
\ - SERVICE IS DISTURBED. NO EXISTING SERVICE SHALL Ex! MANr,oLE 7a7 i
\ / BE LEFT UNCONNECTED OVERNIGHT. TOP 110.37 INV. 103.60 (IN)
\ / INV. 103.8 (OUT)
\
t~ • EX. MANHOL 7459
~ \ ~ TOP 108.91 \ ~ \ \ INV. 100.95 IN) \ EX. MANHOLE 7470 /
t p INV. 100.85 OUT) 4 TOP 110.07 INV. 103.18 IN) ~y~'
\ \ \ INV. 103.12 OUT) / ~
Ex. AIANHOL 7 E 333 i y
~w \ ~ t~ EX. MANHOLE 7462 \ 151 ~ INV. 105.02 IN) ~
~ o TOP 110.92 \ EX. MANHOLE 7467 ~ INV. 105.00 OUT ~ ~~°°.,..>w ~ LE 7467 ~ Z
~ ' t~51N INV. 101.64 IN) TOP 109.49 \ ~ \ EX. MANHOLE 7465 INV. 102.59 (IN) INV. 101.59 OUT) INV. 102.55 OUT i ~ 151` i
Z \ INV. 102.03 IN) ( ) i (OUT) ~ ~ N~ 6
~ t INV. 102.00 OUT u~ ~
+ VENT t81~ ~ 1316AN 151SIW EX. \ 24~µ \ p + VENT ex. ~ ..W... / 1 + ~M MANHOLE 7521 Wy~°
EX 241SAN + r- R n,n~r , ~
\ IS11NG 2~ 2~~SIW M7 V~~ 241SAN 2NSAN n ~ DISTIIRBMIC ~ ONE ~ m,rR^n.rm'r O
\ E IrVWHOLE 7519 Z n , y~ MANHOLE 7524 ..,f ER Ww~~ +
FF ~ ~ 6~ m" wd'~ O NE nnnPm~mm _ _
"0W"" IruWHOIE 7520 \,'~,h,~ \ STA. 0+00.00 WOODLAND OR. ZO rmn M1 - _ - i mnnrm,m yw"
~ ^~n,n,„,,,,a, awK ~ ~ STA. 20+93.38 ~~r nrnrmnrmrnnmm~ mry'yw nnnnninnun ~ " ,n,nrn"„mmnr EX. MANHOLE 7332 /
~ ` - 14'°m.mmm~mmmm,,,umno,,,mmmmmmunm„m„mu»,,,, ,mm,nm,,,,„nm, 40 LF 361 STEEL. CASING 9" ,mn~~„~~n rrrn ~ASING r „y,~rryr,uw"~""~~r ~ ~ INV. 104.46 IN) ~
~ ~ wv. ~ \ ~ ~ ~ 103.78 ~no,mamnmmum„n ~r,rnrn, rrn,~~rnr y,~wrw 7309 iNV. „w~W X. MANH I ~G2•~c TOP 109.79 NV. 104.40 OUT) ~ ~ /
~ ~ _ aq 7.70 WV. 01.58 ~ , u„mmnn,,,.,,,,,,m.,unu, ,mumnnnn nn,,,m,n^'m w~~.ul..u.,,,,, MN. 102.02 „uuuumnu,,.uu,un„mm, nm d 1 nm`" INV. 103.96 12"0) / rnmm~pnrmr - uuyueu
~ • \ 8~. _ _ ~ ~ ,wu. ..,,.,..,ua, w~ nnnmm~u,n ,mm~nmmmnn Min INV. 104.01 IN 15"0 1 ,ate'
Q ~~~ua. ilnUlnnlnlniNluinnl 11 Ull MANHOLE 7521A INV. 103.68 OUT 15 oy ~ ~ InlirmniNrunninnl ~~Y~~:. ~ MANHOLE 7523
~ . _ _ p '-ww-- ~I~~WI Iu~,,,~Y~,uluYwu.,.lll.......,1~.,1.nt~,,..w.lLLl +IIIN1IIlllltluu + .
Of z~ u?~ is
~ ~ 1 TOP 109.99 d E \ ` - gg~F ~ , p ~ INV. 102,90 IN) E 1, ~ FFE I gU
\ r, ~ - - - a INV. 102.84 OUT Z~N.? 1 ~ ~ 1 ) r-- ~ x~
~ , 2 gU~ fit, 1 rov to7.ea NE MAN 7 ~ ~ , FFER HOLE 522 , , ,
TBM 5 1 ~ ~ wv. to2.et Z~ \ i ex. O~GFIOUSE TYPE)
LROAD IN POWER POLE 0 I ~ ~ t~.µ j--- BLDG.
STJI 20+75.61 176.5' 1 tom"" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ . ~ ~ ~ 50 x20 x6 TEMPORARY STONE EX. SAN. SEWER ~ ,
ELEVATION 110.95 I 1 EX. MANHOLE 7267 X. MANHO 7 68 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 284' 7~1.05X ski a
1 ~ 1 OP 1 9. TOP 111.01 TBM i6 1 INV. 102.26 IN 8't?) INV. 105.99 4~a SER.
INV. 1 1 I I INV, 105.99 4 0 SER. RAILROAD SPIKE IN 30 1 GUM TREE 0 1 0 .8a N) EX. MANHOL 7 00 a>.
1 INV. 101,65 OUT INV, 101.90 IN TOP 108.93 1 ) ) M STA. 27+10.98 (83 R'1~ 1 ~ INV. 101,88 OUT ~ INV. 103.93 4 o SER. 100 YR. BASE FLOOD ELEV. s ~ ~;q T M OD ELEV. = 113.90 (STATION 15+00) 1 . 2
( ) ~ » ELEVATION 110,82 ~ ~ Ex. SAN. SEWER ~ INV. 103.93 4 o SER. 1 1 YR. BASE FLOOD ELEV. OD ELEV. = 115.00' STATION 30+00) a
3 ~ 330 ~ 3.45X ~ ~ ELEV.110.95 I~• 102.56 IN) ~ ~ ~ INV. 102.56 DUT) (
I
- -rt - 1-- - ~ - - -
120 - - - - rt-- -T- rt--- 120
a - --t-- - -
~i o ' _
t ~ + ni - ~ -r -
- - - -r - - ~ _ . _ _ i fi_. - _ _ } - ~ _ _ _ _ - _
115 ' x Z - - - - w_ Z 1 115 N ~ I
-rt - - I -
fi-- - _ r - - -
_ _
110 - - - - j--- - - ~ - - _ 110
- ~ _ _ - I_~_ ~ - - r- - - - - - - ----t I !
- ---r-- - _ ~ I i
105 - - - I - ! I ~ ~ - _ - _ - 105 4'I I~
I I SAN. - - - - 241 I I
- - _ - -
P. 24 >t IN- - - - - - - - - {
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 100 - _ 41 SAN. 0 0. P. - 4'i - --SAN. S 0 O 087_- - _ _ PROP 24 DI . 3 _ x , too
_ _ _ t _ _ - 1 ----t---- - -
i - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - t _ _ r
- - - - - - - - , _ i _ -
fi _ _ _
95 - _ _ _ 0 ~ t - - , ~ ~ ~ - _ _ _ NG t 7 - - - -r 95
- _ _ - r _ _ _ - t I
_ _ _r__.__ _ _ - -_t _ _ _
~ ~ I
90 - r -
I I , ~
O - - -r---- - - _ - - --t-- ---t
2Z - t _ _ _ _ _ _r----- , - - - -t- - -
s - - i i - _ - _ - --t - - -
85 - - N ~ ~ ~ ~
O N O t0 ~ N ~ M~ I ~ ~D ~ N
h _ - - ~ 00 O - - - - --A - n
Ot ~ ~ - _ _ - _ ~I 8 ~ p _ _ O I - n t ~ II ~ _ 1 - . v
~ N~ - +I +N ^ + ~ ~~N --fi ----r---- ?M
~ ~ _ ~ N N N ~ ----fi--- _ t - - - t--____ _ 8O M
<a a ~I <a < a ~ <la a
- - - - - I - -r - - - _ - - - rt--
- --rt-- - - -r-- __t - _ -r- ~
t _ y...-- - .Y...-._ f.._ t - - ' I
75 - _ _ - _ I _ . ~ I ~ ~ { i. i
~ 1 __.1--..___. __.-_-i_._
15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 3+00 24±00 25+00 28+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00
GREEN ENGINEERING CITY OF WILSON :)N REVISION DATE BY DATE: JIBE 2002 SCALE PROJECT No: WILSO\99-002
CONSTRUCTION F.B. rr 682, 698 HORIZ. T 50' CADFILE: 990026M2.DWG
WATBi, WASTEWATER, SURVEYING, PLANNNG, MWecr NuwaO.ZMEW WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS - C 3W K ooLneeono sr. P.o. eox eoo wIL.sori, ri.c. 27ee3 No. ASCII FILE: VERT. PLOT DATE. FEB. 1. 2005 wig
PART A -HOMINY SWAMP (NTERCE ~ ,'~~EO CRECN TB. (2W 27-5ijB5 FAX (2W 243-74ED MflCe*WaOf1aiaCOII1 WILSON COUNTY ERCEPTOR DRAWINGS MAP N0.
a
L~J17 1 1 SHEET N0. 0 F RACK NORTH CAROLINA