NCG020045_Compliance Evaluation_20190503

Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
May 3, 2019
Martin Marietta Materials, Incorporated
Attention: Mr. Richard Broughton
8701 Red Oak Boulevard, Suite 540
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Stormwater Certificate of Coverage- NCG020045
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Broughton:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
WILLIAM E. (TOBY) VINSON, JR.
Interim Director
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Reports for the inspections we conducted
at Arrowood Quarry on April 25, 2019. The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any
questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or by email at
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Zahid S. Khan, CPM, CPESC, CPSWQ
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
Enclosed: Inspection report
c: Stormwater Permitting Branch

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020045 Effective: 05/09/16 Expiration: 09/30/20 Owner: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Martin Marietta-Arrowwood
County: Mecidenburg 11325 Texland Blvd
Region: Mooresville
' Charlotte NC 28217
Contact Person: Richard Broughton Title: Phone: [phone]
Diroctions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary URC:: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 04/25/2019 Entry Time: 09:50AM Exit Time: 11:30AM
Primary Inspector: Angela Y Lee Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
James D Moore Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Complaint Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ® Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG020045 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 04/25/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation . Reason for Visit: Complaint
Inspection Summary:
This inspection was conducted as a routine annual inspection in conjunction with a mine inspection. Richard Broughton from
Martin Marietta present for the inspection. At the time of the inspection, the site was in compliance.
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCG020045 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc
Inspection Date: 04/25/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Complaint
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan Include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
i ❑ ❑ ❑
# Dues [lie Plan include a Sturrnwater Facility Inspection Program?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitorinq Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ®❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ®❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ®❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ®❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ®❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page 3 of 3