The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20100952 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_2018_20181205FINAL YEAR 5 (2018) ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT MARTIN'S CREEK II MITIGATION PROJECT Cherokee County, North Carolina DMS Project No. 92633 (Contract No. 005717) USACE Action ID No. SAW — 2009-00209/DWR Project No. 10-0952 SCO No. 08-07251-01 Data Collection — March -November 2018 Hiwassee River Basin Cataloging Unit 06020002170010 SUBMITTED TO/PREPARED FOR: North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services 217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 December 2018 FINAL YEAR 5 (2018) ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT MARTIN'S CREEK II MITIGATION PROJECT Cherokee County, North Carolina DMS Project No. 92633 (Contract No. 005717) USACE Action ID No. SAW — 2009-00209/DWR Project No. 10-0952 SCO No. 08-07251-01 Data Collection — March -November 2018 Hiwassee River Basin Cataloging Unit 06020002170010 SUBMITTED TO/PREPARED FOR: North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services 217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 SUBMITTED BY: F—, Axiom Environmental, Inc. Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 December 2018 t Axiom Environmental, Inc. December 5, 2018 Mr. Matthew Reid North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services 5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102 Asheville, NC 28801 Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27603 919-215-1693 RE: Martin's Creek II Monitoring (DMS Project # 92633, Contract # 005717) Final MY5 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report Dear Matthew: 12-004.16 Axiom Environmental, Inc. (AXE) is pleased to provide you with three hard copies and a CD of digital files for the Final Martin's Creek II Annual Monitoring Report. We received your comments via email on December 3, 2018 and have addressed them as follows: • 2.2 Vegetation: Please add sentence at the end of the invasive species discussion: DMS will continue invasive species treatment in 2019. This sentence was added to the invasive species discussion. • 2.2 Vegetation: Please add sentence to section discussing wetland delineation services: DMS is not seeking additional wetland credit for the site. This sentence was added to the wetland delineation discussion. • Table 2: Please add two additional lines under Year 5 Monitoring for Vegetation Monitoring and Stream Monitoring with corresponding dates. These additional rows were added to Table 2. • Cross Sections and Table 11: Please double check XS 15. According to Table l la, this section did not hold the Abkf constant in the dimension calculations. Please update graph and table as necessary. The data for cross section 15 were revised to assure that the bankfull area remained fixed from last year's data. The graph and table were updated to reflect the change. • As Axiom has done in the past, please include a response to the comment letter and how/where the comments were addressed. Please insert this letter directly behind the cover page in the final deliverables. This letter has been inserted directly behind the cover page in the final deliverable. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments regarding any component of this submittal. Thank you for the opportunity to continue to assist the Division of Mitigation Services with this important project. Sincerely, AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Kenan Jernigan Project Scientist Attachments: 3 hardcopies Final Martin's Creek II MY5 (2018) Annual Monitoring Report 1 CD containing digital support files Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY.............................................................................................................. 2.0 METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................................... 2.1 Streams............................................................................................................................... 2.2 Vegetation.......................................................................................................................... 2.3 Wetland Hydrology............................................................................................................ 3.0 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................. Appendices APPENDIX A. PROJECT BACKGROUND DATA AND MAPS Figure 1. Vicinity Map Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3. Project Contacts Table Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes APPENDIX B. VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA Figures 2 and 2A -2C. Current Conditions Plan View Tables 5A -5E. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Stream Fixed -Station Photographs Vegetation Monitoring Photographs APPENDIX C. VEGETATION PLOT DATA Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species APPENDIX D. STREAM SURVEY DATA Cross-section Plots Longitudinal Profile Plots Substrate Plots Table IOa- IOf. Baseline Stream Data Summary Table l la -1 If. Monitoring Data APPENDIX E. HYDROLOGY DATA Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary Figure E1. Martin's Creek 11 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall Groundwater Gauge Graphs Sample Time -Lapse Photos APPENDIX F. WETLAND CONFIRMATION DATA Figure 3. Wetland Confirmation Overview Wetland Dataforms APPENDIX G. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA USGS Topography Map Soils Map Preconstruction Photographs 1 3 4 5 6 6 Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Table of Contents 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) has established the Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project (Site) located in Cherokee County, just south of the town of Murphy. The Site includes a 93.87 -acre easement encompassed within 14 -digit Cataloging Unit 06020002170010 of the Hiwassee River Basin (Figure 1, Appendix B and Table 4, Appendix A). Land use at the Site, prior to mitigation activities, was composed of livestock pasture, open land, a residence, and forested areas. Martin's Creek and its tributaries were impaired by historical and current land management practices, which included timber harvesting, pasture, channelization, and livestock grazing. Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and project attributes are summarized in Tables 1-4 (Appendix A). The Site is located along Martin's Creek and several unnamed tributaries, which have been assigned Stream Index Number 1-49 and Best Usage Classification of C. Site streams are listed on the NCDWQ draft 2014 and final 2012 Section 303(d) list of impaired streams due to a fair bioclassification for reduced ecological/biological integrity and fish communities, and elevated levels of fecal coliform bacteria. The Site is located within a Targeted Local Watershed that has been identified for stream and buffer restoration opportunities (NCDMS 2008). The Site lies within the focus area of the Peachtree -Martins Creek Local Watershed Plan (LWP) and roughly corresponds to Restoration site #1 & Preservation site #1 of the LWP project atlas (NCDMS 2007). Goals of the LWP include implementation of wetland and stream restoration projects that reduce sources of sediment and nutrients by restoring riparian buffers, stabilizing stream banks, and restoring natural channel geomorphology, particularly in headwater streams. The project goals will directly address stressors identified in the Peachtree -Martins Creek LWP, namely lack of riparian vegetation, channel modification, excess sediment inputs, excess nutrient inputs, and bacterial contamination as follows. • Restore geomorphically stable stream channels within the Site; • Restore or enhance wetlands; • Exclude livestock from accessing project streams, wetlands, and riparian zones; • Improve and restore hydrologic connections and achieve uplift of ecosystem functions; • Improve water quality within the Site by reducing bank erosion, improving nutrient and sediment removal, and stabilizing stream banks; • Restore and preserve headwater tributaries to the Peachtree -Martins Creek Watershed and the Hiwassee River; and • Improve aquatic and terrestrial habitat by improving substrate and in -stream cover, adding woody debris, reducing water temperatures, and restoring riparian habitat. The Site mitigation plan was completed in March 2010 with the final design and construction plans completed in November 2010 (Table 2, Appendix A). Proj ect construction was completed between October 2012 and July 2013. The implemented mitigation is as follows (Figure 2, Appendix B and Table 1, Appendix A). Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 1 8817 Stream Mitigation Units Restoring approximately 3486 linear feet of stream channel through construction of stable channel at the historic floodplain elevation. Enhancing (level I) approximately 832 linear feet of stream channel through cessation of current land use practices, installing grade control structures, repairing bank erosion, restoring proper channel dimension, and planting with native forest vegetation. Enhancing (level II) approximately 1903 linear feet of stream channel through cessation of current land use practices, removing invasive species, and planting with native forest vegetation. • Preserving 21,327 linear feet of stream channel. 5.97 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units • Restoring approximately 5.20 acres of riparian wetland by removing spoil castings, restoring stream inverts to historic elevations rehydrating stream -side wetlands, removing drain tile, eliminating land use practices, and planting with native forest vegetation. • Enhancing approximately 1.61 acres of riparian wetland by fencing livestock and supplemental planting. Planting a native woody riparian buffer (at least 30 feet in width) adjacent to restored/enhanced streams and wetlands within the Site. • Protecting the Site in perpetuity with a conservation easement. Stream Success Criteria Stream restoration success criteria for the Site are based on the Stream Mitigation Guidelines issued in April 2003 by the USACE and NCDWQ. Success criteria for stream restoration will include 1) documentation of two bankfull events, 2) little change in the channel cross-section from as -built conditions, 3) stable longitudinal profile, 4) substrate consistency, and 5) photographic evidence of stability. Bankfull Events Two bankfull flow events in separate years must be documented within the 5 -year monitoring period. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until two bankfull events have been documented in separate years. Cross-sections Riffle cross-sections on restoration and enhancement reaches should be stable and should show little change in bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, and width -to -depth ratio. Riffle cross-sections should generally fall within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen stream type. If any changes do occur, these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing signs of instability. Indicators of instability include a vertically incising thalweg or eroding channel banks. Changes in the channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a decrease in the width -to - depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth. Longitudinal Profile Longitudinal profile data for the stream reach should show that bedform features are remaining stable. The riffles should be steeper and shallower than the pools, while the pools should be deep with flat water surface slopes. The relative percentage of riffles and pools should not change significantly from the design parameters. Bed Material Anal Substrate materials in restoration reaches should indicate a progression towards or the maintenance of coarser materials in the riffle features and smaller particles in the pool features. Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 2 Photo Reference Sites Photographs will be used to evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures subjectively. Lateral photos should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks. A series of photos over time should indicate successive maturation of riparian vegetation. Vegetation Success Criteria Success criteria have been established to verify that the vegetation component supports community elements necessary for forest development. Success criteria for this project includes an average density of 320 planted stems per acre must be surviving in the first three monitoring years. Subsequently, 290 planted stems per acre must be surviving in year 4, and 260 planted stems per acre in year 5. Wetland Success Criteria Hydrologic success will be based on conditions of on-site reference wetlands. Success will be determined by the following criteria. Years One Through Three Hydrologic success criteria will be met if the Site demonstrates groundwater table levels within 12 inches of the soil surface for a minimum of 13% of the growing season (this criterion reflects a deviation of 50% from the duration of saturation expected for this type of wetland system (-25%). Success for monitoring years one through three will be determined based on this 50% tolerance of deviation from the duration of wetland hydrology at the reference sites. Years Four and Five Success for monitoring years four and five will be determined based on a 20% tolerance of deviation from the duration of wetland hydrology at the reference sites. Therefore, it is expected that in years four and five the site will achieve a minimum of 20% saturation. Based on reference conditions and the criterion stated above, it is expected that reference soil saturation for years one through five will continue to exceed the regulatory 12.5% minimum requirement of the growing season for Cherokee County. In order to attain conditions suitable for the formation of wetland vegetation and hydric soils, the Site should be saturated within 12 inches of the surface or inundated for consecutive period equal to 24 days. However, to meet hydrologic success criteria and mimic the reference wetland hydrology, the site should demonstrate wetland hydrology for a minimum of 25 days in years one through three. In years four and five, this will increase to a minimum of 38 days. Overbank flooding from the adjacent channel will also be noted during monitoring. Reference areas will be monitored for a minimum of five years. Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in tables and figures within this report's appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS upon request. 2.0 METHODOLOGY Monitoring of the Site's restoration efforts will be performed until agreed upon success criteria are fulfilled. Monitoring is proposed for the stream channel, riparian vegetation, and hydrology for a period of five years Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 3 (Figures 2 & 2A -2C, Appendix A). Monitoring reports of collected data will be submitted no later than December of each monitoring year. 2.1 Streams Post -restoration monitoring will be conducted for five years following the completion of construction to evaluate the effectiveness of the restoration practices. Measurements were taken using a Topcon GTS 303 total station and Recon data collector. The raw total station file was processed using Carlson Survey Software into a Computer Aided Design (CAD) file. Coordinates were exported as a text/ASCII file to Microsoft Excel for processing and presentation of data, and are not georeferenced. Pebble counts were completed using the modified Wolman method (Rosgen 1993). Monitored stream parameters include stream dimension (cross-sections), pattern (longitudinal survey), profile (profile survey), and photographic documentation. Stream data can be found in Appendix D. On March 8, 2017, two time-lapse cameras were installed on MC UTIR2. These cameras were installed to document 30 consecutive days of continuous flow. The 2018 photos from the downstream camera show obvious, continuous stream flow from January 24 to March 22, or 58 days, when the camera battery failed. The battery was replaced on April 5 and continuous flow was documented until June 11, or 67 days, when herbaceous vegetation obstructed the view of the camera. The upstream camera battery died on January 17, 2018 and was not replaced until April 5. However, obvious, continuous flow was visible from April 5 until May 15, or 41 days, when a photo appears to show water in the pool and a dry riffle. Another period of flow was documented from September 8 until November 11, or 61 days. It is expected that the stream will continue to flow through the remainder of 2018. A selection of Year 5 (2018) time-lapse photos is in Appendix E, and all photos can be made available upon request. Bankfull Events The occurrence of bankfull events within the monitoring period will be documented by the use of a crest gauge and photographs. One crest gauge was installed to record the highest watermark between site visits; the gauge will be checked each Site visit to determine if a bankfull event has occurred (Figure 2A, Appendix B). Photographs will be used to document the occurrence of debris lines and sediment deposition on the floodplain during monitoring site visits. Three bankfull events were documented during monitoring year 5 (2018) for a total of 16 bankfull events during the five year monitoring period. Cross-sections A total of 19 permanent cross-sections, 12 riffle and 7 pool, were established and will be used to evaluate stream dimension; locations are depicted on Figures 2, 2A, and 2B (Appendix B) Because riffle cross- sections are critical in determining bankfull design parameters, the number of riffle cross-sections established will generally outnumber pool cross-sections. Each cross-section will be marked on both banks with permanent pins to establish the exact transect used. A common benchmark will be used for cross- sections and consistently used to facilitate easy comparison of year-to-year data. The annual cross-section survey will include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, inner berm, edge of water, and thalweg, if the features are present. Riffle cross-sections will be classified using the Rosgen Stream Classification System. No areas of concern or indicators of instability were observed during year 5 (2018) monitoring; therefore, stream dimension measurements are currently meeting success criteria. Longitudinal Profile After Site construction, approximately 4493 linear feet of longitudinal profile was completed to document baseline conditions. Longitudinal profile will be resurveyed annually for the duration of the five-year Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 4 monitoring period. Measurements include thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of low bank. Each of these measurements will be taken at the head of each channel unit (e.g., riffle, pool) and at the maximum pool depth. The survey will be tied to a permanent benchmark. No areas of concern or indicators of bedform instability were observed during year 5 (2018) monitoring; therefore, stream longitudinal profile measurements are currently meeting success criteria. Bed Material Analysis Pebble counts will be conducted annually on one permanent riffle cross-section (100 -counts) at the time cross-section and longitudinal surveys are performed during the five year monitoring period. These samples will reveal changes in sediment gradation over time as the stream adjusts to upstream sediment loads. Year 5 (2018) pebble counts indicate the maintenance of coarser materials in the measured riffle feature; therefore, bed material is currently meeting success criteria. Photo Reference Sites A total of 26 photographs will be used to visually document restoration success for at least five years following construction. Photographs will be taken from a height of approximately five to six feet. Photo locations will be recorded using sub -meter GPS to ensure that the same locations (and view directions) on the Site are monitored in each monitoring period. Year 5 (2018) photo reference sites show no channel aggradation or degradation, or bank erosion 2.2 Vegetation After planting was completed, an initial evaluation was performed to verify planting methods were successful and to determine initial species composition and density. Fifteen sample vegetation plots (10 - meter by 10 -meter) were installed and measured within the Site as per guidelines established in CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). Vegetation plots are permanently monumented with 6 -foot metal t -posts at each corner. In each sample plot, vegetation parameters to be monitored include species composition and species density. Visual observations of the percent cover of shrub and herbaceous species will also be documented by photograph. Vegetation plot data can be found in Appendix C. Year 5 (2018) stem count measurements indicate an average of 297 planted stems per acre (excluding livestakes) across the Site; therefore, the Site is currently meeting vegetation success criteria. Eleven of the fifteen individual vegetation plots met success criteria based on planted stems alone; plots 7 and 11 were each one stem shy of meeting success criteria. When including naturally recruited stems of ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana) and tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) Plot 11 was well -above success criteria. A population of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) was observed on the left bank of UTI -R3 during previous monitoring years. This area has been treated several times throughout the monitoring period, and though it responded well, several resprouts were observed in this area late in year 5 (2018). Two additional Chinese privet populations have been observed during previous monitoring years along the lower reaches of the Right Prong Tributaries, particularly in the vicinity of Photo Points 21 and 23. These still appear vigorous during year 5 (2018). Several smaller Chinese privet populations as well as Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) populations were observed throughout the site during year 5 (2018) monitoring. These areas are depicted on Figures 2A -C, Appendix B. Furthermore, small populations of multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) were observed scattered throughout the Site, with most occurrences in the preservation and enhancement reaches in areas shaded by canopy. NCDMS will continue invasive species treatment in 2019. Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 5 2.3 Wetland Hydrology Thirteen RDS Ecotone WM groundwater monitoring gauges were installed within Site wetland restoration areas to monitor groundwater hydrology (Figure 2A, Appendix A). Hydrological sampling will continue for five years with gauges recording daily and downloaded at a minimum of quarterly throughout the growing season (April 14 -October 21). In addition, an on-site rain gauge will document rainfall data for comparison of groundwater conditions with extended drought conditions. Finally, groundwater gauges located within riverine wetlands adjacent to restored stream reaches will supplement crest gauge measurements to confirm overbank flooding events. Year 5 (2018) rain data comes partially from a Weather Underground Station in Andrews, North Carolina. The onsite rain gauge continued to be infested with ants throughout the growing season, despite best efforts to eradicate them the data was not reliable due to inability of the magnetic reed switch to be activated by the tipping bucket. Wetland success criteria increases in Years 4-5 (2017-2018) to a minimum of 20 percent saturation or inundation during the growing season. Eleven of the thirteen groundwater gauges met or exceeded wetland success criteria for the Year 5 (2018) monitoring year; however, the remainder of the gauges were saturated/inundated for 15.2-16.8 percent of the growing season. Year 5 (2018) data indicates that the majority of the Site wetland area is successful. On May 3, 2018, a wetland delineation was performed by Axiom as part of the wetland confirmation services in the monitoring contract with NCDMS. This delineation was performed in accordance with the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (USACE, 2012) and has not been approved in the field by a USACE representative. The results of the delineation show a net increase in wetlands across the site from the wetlands originally proposed as mitigation assets (Table 1, Appendix A). NCDMS is not seeking additional wetland credit for the site. Appendix F contains a figure depicting the 2018 wetland delineation as well as the accompanying wetland data forms. 3.0 REFERENCES ACIS-NOAA Regional Climate Centers. WETS Table Murphy, NC6001. Available online at: http://agacis.rcc-acis.org/37039/wets/results [November 20, 2015]. Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Levels 1-2 Plot Sampling Only, Version 4.2. Available online at http:Hcvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm. North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2012. Final North Carolina Water Quality Assessment and Impaired Waters List (NC 2012 Integrated Report Category 5, 303(d) List) (online). Available: hqp://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=9d45b3b4-d066- 4619-82e6-ea8eaOe01930&groupld=38364 [February 17, 2014]. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina. North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2014. Draft 2014 NC 303(d) List -Category 5 Assessments Requiring TMDLs (online). Available: hqp://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document librar/ get file?uuid=096fb2ff-296b-4bd8-8b88-e83bb5984be6&groupld=38364 [February 17, 20141. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina. Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 6 North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) and Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design. 2007. Peachtree -Martins Creek Local Watershed Plan (Phase3), Hiwassee River Basin, Cherokee and Clay Counties, North Carolina. October 2007 Watershed Management Plan. [Online WWW]. Available URL: http://www.hrwc.net/pmcplan/pmc plan_ executive_summary_.pdf. North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2010. Martin's Creek II Mitigation Plan. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Available online at http://its.enr.state.nc.us/WebLink8/0/doc/140433/Pa eg 2.aspx North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2014. Annual Monitoring and Closeout Reporting Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance, dated February 2014. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Available online at http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/eg t file?p_1_id=60409&folderld=18877169&name= DLFE-86604.pdf North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2008. Hiwassee River Basin Restoration Priorities 2008 (online). Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get file?uuid= ea2df99d-3031-4c7b-87ea-79d56a3e4ale&groupld=60329. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina. Rosgen. 1993. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology, Training Manual. River Short Course, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0). Wetland Regulatory Assistance Program. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Vicksburg, MS. United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, North Carolina Division of Water Quality (USACE et al.). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map - 1974. State of North Carolina. Weakley, Alan S. 2012. Flora of the Southern and Mid -Atlantic States. Available online at: http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/WeakleysFIora.pdf [September 28, 2012]. University of North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina page 7 APPENDIX A PROJECT BACKGROUND DATA AND MAPS Figure 1. Vicinity Map Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3. Project Contacts Table Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices lv �_ Ebenerer Ciikft(_-iKF F. ;1' . TQ 677 E f IA's i" '[ \, V5 00 'Bolts 2'N Pi� P � o-�J� ".h i � S.J± J i,��?'}y� �'• ! by.,, I� 011 t i ��- ��"•` � 00 6 -. rid' x(7'7 r00 �"r j c.a g k'_�r ' ti,� ,�' � - y �� ,_ ? •Q� �0 �� f � �'� ppb - ti ''Y_ J J O. f� MAn►r,s Project Location J reek 35.0534640N 84.024879°W AHALA - OATIONAI!, F T —CLAY UN10 _ — ixDEFriTT r;` )ARY ca o North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services Axiom Environmental, Inc. w Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site Mitigation Credit Summations Stream Riparian Wetland Nonriparian Wetland 8817 5.97 Pro'ects Components Station Range Existing Linear Footage/Acreage Priority Approach Restoration/Restoration Restoration Equivalent Linear Footage/Acreage Mitigation Ratio Mitigation Credits Comment Right Prong Martin's Creek and UTs 17,234 --- Preservation 17,234-203= 17,031 5:1 3406.2 Three short reaches in upstream portion of RP UTl do not have adequate buffer to claim credit and therefore have been removed from the total linear footage and calculated mitigation credits. Right Prong Martin's Creek and UTs 971 --- Enhance II 971 2.5:1 388.4 Enhancement Level II - invasive species controls and localized erosion stabilization. Martin's Creek UTs 4296 --- Preservation 4296 5:1 859.2 Martin's Creek* 857 --- Enhance II 857 5:1* 171.4 Enhancement Level II - invasive species controls and localized erosion stabilization. UT -2 to Martin's Creek 75 --- Enhance II 75 2.5:1 30.0 UT 1 (Reach 3) to Martin's CreekLevel Station 00+00 to 03+37 337 Enhance I 337 1.5:1 224.7 I stream enhancement - grade control structures, repair bank erosion, and restore proper dimension. UT 1-3 (Reach 1) to Martin's CreekLevel Station 00+00 to 04+95 495 Enhance I 495 1.5:1 330.0 I stream enhancement - grade control structures, repair bank erosion, and restore proper dimension. UT 1 (Reach 2) to Martin's Creek Station 00+00 to 10+52 1052 I Restoration 1052 1:1 1052 Construction of a new channel on the existing floodplain. UT 1 (Reach 4) to Martin's Creek 05+46 to 05+91 332 II Restoration 51 1:1 51.0 Construction of a new channel in a low slope valley. 05+91 to 06+35** 37 2:1** 18.5 06+35 to 15+75 941 1:1 941.0 15+75 to 16+75** 100 2:1** 50.0 UT 1-3 (Reach 2) to Martin's Creek 05+54 to 05+90 1068 II Restoration 35 1:1 35.0 Construction of a new channel in a low slope valley. 05+90 to 06+10*** 20 2:1** 10.0 06+10 to 18+59 1250 1:1 1250.0 Wetland Restoration --- --- Restoration 5.14 1:1 5.14 Restoration of riparian wetlands through stream restoration activities, filling abandoned channels and drain tiles, removing spoil castings, and planting. 0.06 2:1^ 0.03 Wetland Enhancement 1.61 --- Enhancement 1.604 2:1 0.802 Enhancement of existing riparian wetlands by fencing livestock and planting. 0.006 4:1' 0.002 Component Summation Restoration Level Stream (linear footage) Riparian Wetland (acreage) Nonriparian Wetland (acreage) Restoration 3486 5.20 -- Enhancement (Level 1) 832 -- Enhancement (Level II) 1903 1.61 -- Preservation 21,327 -- Totals 27,548 6.81 Mitigation Units 8817 SMUs 5.97 Riparian WMUs 0.00 Nonriparian WMUs * Martin's Creek proper is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 5:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units. ** UTl (Reach 4) stations 05+91 to 06+35 and 15+75 to 16+75 are located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 2:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units. *** UTI -3 (Reach 2) station 05+90 to 06+10 is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 2:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units. ^0.06 acres of wetland restoration is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 2:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units. '0.006 acres of wetland enhancement is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 4:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units. Martin's Creek II Final DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) December 2018 Appendices Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site Activity or Deliverable Data Collection Complete Completion or Delivery Mitigation Plan January 2010 -July 2010 September 2010 Final Design — Construction Plans September 2010- March 2011 March 2011 Construction -- October 2012 -July 2013 Temporary S&E Mix applied to Entire Project Site -- October 2012 -July 2013 Permanent Seed Mix applied to the Entire Project Site -- October 2012 -July 2013 Bare Root; Containerized; and B&B Plantings for the Entire Project Site March 2014 Mitigation Plan/ As -Built (Year 0 Monitoring Baseline) April 2014 April 2014 Invasive Species Treatment -- July 2014 Year 1 Monitoring October 2014 December 2014 Warranty Supplemental Planting -- March 2015 Year 2 Monitoring November 2015 December 2015 Warranty Supplemental Planting -- February 2016 Invasive Species Treatment -- July 2016 Invasive Species Treatment September 2016 Year 3 Monitoring November 2016 December 2016 Year 4 Monitoring November 2017 December 2017 Year 5 Monitoring November 2018 December 2018 Year 5 Vegetation Monitoring September 24, 2018 Year 5 Stream Monitoring April 3, 2018 -- Martin's Creek II Final DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) December 2018 Appendices Table 3. Project Contacts Table Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site Designer Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 797 Haywood Road, Suite 201 Asheville, NC 28806 Micky Clemmons 828-350-1408 Construction Plans and Sediment and Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. Erosion Control Plans 797 Haywood Road, Suite 201 Asheville, NC 28806 Micky Clemmons 828-350-1408 Construction Contractor River Works, Inc. 6105 Chapel Hill Rd. Raleigh, NC 27607 919-582-3574 Planting Contractor Carolina Silvics, Inc. 908 Indian Trail Road Edenton, NC 27932 (252)482-8491 As -built Surveyor Turner Land Surveying. PLLC 3201 Glenridge Drive Raleigh, NC 27604 919-875-1378 Baseline Data Collection Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 Grant Lewis 919-215-1693 Martin's Creek II Final DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) December 2018 Appendices Table 4. Project Attribute Table Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site Project County Cherokee County, North Carolina Physiographic Region Blue Ridge Ecoregion Broad Basins Project River Basin Hiwassee USGS HUC for Project (14 digit) 06020002170010 NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project 04-05-02 Planning Area Yes — Peachtree -Martins Creek LWP WRC Class (Warm, Cool, Cold) Cold % of project easement fenced or demarcated 100 Beaver activity observed during design phase? No Right Prong Martin's Creek Martin's Creek RP UTI RP Mainstem MC MC UTI MC UTI -3 MC UT2 MC Mainstem LII Enh Rest LI Enh PI Rest Drainage Area .17 0.6 0.02-0.18 0.07-0.08 0.39 6.81 Stream Order (USGS topo) 1st 3rd 2nd 1 st 1 st T 3rd Restored Length (feet) Perennial or Intermittent I/P I/P P P P P P P Watershed Type Rural Watershed impervious cover <10% NCDWQ AU/Index number 1-49 (Martin's Creek), 1-49-3 (Right Prong Martins Creek) NCDWQ Classification C C I C C C 303d listed? No Upstream of a 303d listed No Reasons for 303d listed segment NA Total acreage of easement 93.87 Total existing vegetated acreage of easement Total planted restoration acreage 17 acres Rosgen Classification of preexisting B B Eb/FbB /G Cb/G Eb/B OF B C Rosgen Classification of As -built B B B/C B/C B C B C Valley type II II VIII VIII VIII Valley slope N/A 0.015-0.05 0.007-0.04 N/A N/A Cowardin classification of proposed N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Trout waters designation No Species of concern, endangered etc. No Dominant Soil Series Cullowhee fine sandy loam Thurmont- Dillard Complex Arkaqua loam Dillard loam Arkaqua loam Arkaqua loam Arkaqua loam Martin's Creek II Final DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) December 2018 Appendices APPENDIX B VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA Figures 2 and 2A -2C. Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) Tables 5A -5E. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Stream Station Photographs Vegetation Plot Photographs Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices 0 500 1,100 2,100 3,10 Axiom Environmental. Inc. Axiom Environmental 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 (919) 215-1693 CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW MARTINS CREEK II DMS PROJECT # 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Dwn. by. KRJ FIGURE Date: Nov 2018 2A Project: 12-004.16 Axiom Environmental. Inc. Axiom Environmental 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 (919) 215-1693 CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW MARTINS CREEK II (MARTINS CREEK TRIBUTARIES) DMS PROJECT # 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Dwn. by. KRJ FIGURE Date: Nov 2018 2B Project: 12-004.16 1 500 1,000 1,500 � � _ -yp L-. �wq_ 'd •'5:}4L`'•fz.F. ei gq.•'� '`t yl3 - - l�PY '�� S�.i='a�9�fli ��SiG9��.�C 1� :i. If"".Y:.�I��'�l.• r diC. �. J�.�s'�.. 1.: .c i ' .�''�ll��.. ,.. Axiom Environmental 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 (919) 215-1693 Axiom Environmental, Inc. A k � 22 21 24 . w ry.- CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW MARTINS CREEK II (RIGHT PRONG TRIBUTARIES) DMS PROJECT # 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Legend Easement Boundary Streams Monitoring Reach CVS Plots Photo Points Dense Privet Dwn. by. KRJ FIGURE 2C Date: Nov 2018 Project: 12-004.16 Table 5A Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Reach ID UT1 Reach 4 Assessed Length 1129 Adjusted % Number Number with Footage with for Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody Category Sub-Cateciory Metric as Intended As -built Segments Footage as Intended Ve etation Ve etation Ve etation 1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units) 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars) 0 0 100% 2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100% 2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 23 23 100% 3. Meander Pool Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 25 25 100% 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 25 25 100% 4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 25 25 100% 2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide) 25 25 100% 2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion 0 0 100% 100% Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears 2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100% and are providing habitat. 3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100% Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100% 3. Engineered Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. $ $ ° 100% 2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. $ $ 100% 2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. $ $ 100% 3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) $ $ 100% 4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow. $ $ 100% Table 513 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Reach ID UT1 Reach 3 Assessed Length 337 Adjusted % Number Number with Footage with for Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody Category Sub-Cateciory Metric as Intended As -built Segments Footage as Intended Ve etation Ve etation Ve etation 1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units) 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars) 0 0 100% 2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100% 2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 10 10 100% 3. Meander Pool Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 10 10 100% 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 10 10 100% 4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 10 10 100% 2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide) 10 10 100% 2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion 0 0 100% 100% Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears 2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100% and are providing habitat. 3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100% Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100% 3. Engineered Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 4 4 ° 100% 2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 4 4 100% 2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 4 4 100% 3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 4 4 100% 4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow. 4 4 100% Table 5C Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Reach ID UT1-3 Reach 2 Assessed Length 1305 Adjusted % Number Number with Footage with for Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody Category Sub-Cateciory Metric as Intended As -built Segments Footage as Intended Ve etation Ve etation Ve etation 1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units) 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars) 0 0 100% 2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100% 2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 32 32 100% 3. Meander Pool Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 32 32 100% 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 32 32 100% 4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 32 32 100% 2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide) 32 32 100% 2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion 0 0 100% 100% Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears 2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100% and are providing habitat. 3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100% Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100% 3. Engineered Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 10 10 ° 100% 2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 10 10 100% 2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 10 10 100% 3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 10 10 100% 4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow. 10 10 100% Table 5D Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Reach ID UT1-3 Reach 1 Assessed Length 495 Adjusted % Number Number with Footage with for Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody Category Sub-Cateciory Metric as Intended As -built Segments Footage as Intended Ve etation Ve etation Ve etation 1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units) 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars) 0 0 100% 2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100% 2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 16 16 100% 3. Meander Pool Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 22 22 100% 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 22 22 100% 4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 22 22 100% 2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide) 22 22 100% 2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion 0 0 100% 100% Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears 2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100% and are providing habitat. 3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100% Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100% 3. Engineered Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 21 21 ° 100% 2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 21 21 100% 2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 21 21 100% 3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 21 21 100% 4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow. 21 21 100% Table 5E Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Reach ID UT1 Reach 2 Assessed Length 1051 Adjusted % Number Number with Footage with for Major Stable, Total Number of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing Channel Channel Performing Number in Unstable Unstable Performing Woody Woody Woody Category Sub-Cateciory Metric as Intended As -built Segments Footage as Intended Ve etation Ve etation Ve etation 1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability (Riffle and Run units) 1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars) 0 0 100% 2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100% 2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 55 55 100% 3. Meander Pool Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6) 55 55 100% 2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle) 55 55 100% 4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run) 55 55 100% 2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide) 55 55 100% 2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour and erosion 0 0 100% 100% Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears 2. Undercut likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable 0 0 100% 100% and are providing habitat. 3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% 100% Totals 0 0 100% 0 0 100% 3. Engineered Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs. 57 57 ° 100% 2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 57 57 100% 2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms. 57 57 100% 3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 57 57 100% 4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow. 57 57 100% Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Martins Creek II Mitigation Project Planted Acreage 17 Vegetation Category Definitions Mapping Threshold CCPV Depiction Number of Polygons Combined Acreage % of Planted Acreage 1. Bare Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0% 2. Low Stem Density Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0% 2B. Low Planted Stem Density Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0% Total 0 0.00 0.0% 3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor None 0.25 acres N/A 0 0.00 0.0% Cumulative Total 0 0.00 0.0% Easement Acreaae 93.87 1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort. 2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries. 3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5. 4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by DMS such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not Ilkley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary. % of Mapping Number of Combined Easement Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold CCPV Depiction Pol ons Acreage Acreage 4. Invasive Areas of Concern Dense Chinese privet and Japanese honeysuckle throughout Site 1000 SF Blue and Purple 11 0.58 0.6% hatched Polygons 5. Easement Encroachment Areas' None none none 0 0.00 0.0% 1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort. 2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries. 3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5. 4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by DMS such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not Ilkley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary. Martin's Creek II Fixed Station Photographs Taken May/September 2018 Dt,-+„ D-;-+ Photo Point 5 Martin's Creek II Final DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Dl,-+- D-;-+ 7 Photo Point 6 Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) December 2018 Appendices Martin's Creek II Fixed Station Photographs Taken May/September 2018 (continued) Phnfn pninf Q Martin's Creek II Final DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) December 2018 Appendices Martin's Creek II Fixed Station Photographs Taken May/September 2018 (continued) Martin's Creek II Final DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) December 2018 Appendices Martin's Creek II Fixed Station Photographs Taken May/September 2018 (continued) Martin's Creek II Final DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) December 2018 Appendices Martin's Creek II Fixed Station Photographs Taken May/September 2018 (continued) Martin's Creek II Final DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) December 2018 Appendices Martin's Creek II Vegetation Monitoring Photographs Taken September 2018 Martin's Creek II Final DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina I Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) December 2018 Appendices Martin's Creek II Vegetation Monitoring Photographs Taken September 2018 (continued) FP-Iot 9 Plot 12 Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Martin's Creek II Vegetation Monitoring Photographs Taken September 2018 (continued) Martin's Creek II Final DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) December 2018 Appendices APPENDIX C VEGETATION PLOT DATA Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Based on Planted Stems Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site (DMS Project Number 92633) Vegetation Plot ID Vegetation Survival Threshold Met? Tract Mean 1 Yes 73% 2 Yes 3 No 4 Yes 5 No 6 Yes 7 No 8 Yes 9 Yes 10 Yes 11 No 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site (DMS Prosect Number 92633) Report Prepared By Corri Faquin Date Prepared 11/8/2018 10:47 database name Axiom-MartinsII-2018MY5-A-v2.3.l.mdb database location S:\Business\Projects\12\12-004 EEP Monitoring\12-004.16 UT to Martins and Martins\Martins II\2018\CVS computer name KEENAN-PC file size 49156096 DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------ Metadata Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data. Pro', planted Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes. Pro', total stems Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems. Plots List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.). Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots. Vigor bSpp Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species. Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each. Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each species. Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot. Planted Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded. ALL Stems by Plot and spp A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded. PROJECT SUMMARY ------------------------------------- Project Code 92633 project Name Martin's Creek II Description Stream and Wetland Restoration River Basin Hiwassee length(ft) stream -to -edge width (ft) areas m Required Plots (calculated) Sampled Plots 15 Martin's Creek II Final DMS Project Number 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) December 2018 Appendices Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species DMS Project Code 92633. Project Name: Martin's Creek II Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes P -all = Planting including livestakes T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes T includes natural recruits Current Plot Data (MY5 2018) Scientific Name Common Name Species Type 92633-01-0001 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0002 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0003 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0004 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0005 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0006 Pnol-S P -all T IPnoLS 92633-01-0007 P -all T 92633-01-0008 Pnol-S P -all T IPnoLS 92633-01-0009 P -all T 92633-01-0010 Pnol-S P -all T 92633-01-0011 Pnol-S P -all T Acer rubrum red maple Tree 1 4 2 Alnus serrulata hazel alder Shrub 2 2 8 Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree 4 Carya hickory Tree Carya alba mockernut hickory Tree Carya glabra pignut hickory Tree Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 Crataegus hawthorn Tree Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 1 1 1 Fagus grandifolia American beech Tree Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree Juglans nigra black walnut Tree Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 Malus apple Tree Nyssa tupelo Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 Oxydendrum arboreum sourwood Tree Pinus strobus eastern white pine Tree Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree Pinus virginiana Virginia pine Tree Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 4 4 4 5 5 5 3 3 3 1 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 2 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1 Quercus alba white oak Tree Quercus coccinea scarlet oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 2 2 21 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 Quercus shumardii Shumard's oak Tree Salix nigra black willow Tree Unknown IShrub or Tree Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 8 41 323.71 8 1 0.02 4 323.7 9 5 364.2 8 4 323.7 8 1 0.02 4 323.7 10 5 404.7 2 2 80.94 2 1 0.02 2 80.94 2 2 80.94 7 4 283.3 7 1 0.02 4 283.3 11 51 445.2 5 4 202.3 5 1 0.02 4 202.3 5 4 202.3 7 2 283.3 7 7 1 0.02 2 2 283.3 28-3.31242.81 6 51 6 6 1 0.02 51 51 242.81 242.81445.21 11 71 11 1 0.02 7 445.2 15 9 607 7 4 283.3 7 1 0.02 4 283.3 13 5 526.1 11 5 445.2 11 1 0.02 5 445.2 19 6 768.9 6 6 12 1 0.02 4 4 5 242.8 242.8 485.6 Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes P -all = Planting including livestakes T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes T includes natural recruits Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species (Continued) DMS Project Code 92633. Project Name: Martin's Creek II Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes P -all = Planting including livestakes T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes T includes natural recruits Current Plot Data (MY5 2018) Annual Means Scientific Name Common Name Species Type 92633-01-0012 92633-01-0013 92633-01-0014 92633-01-0015 MYS (2018) MY4 (20 7) IPnoLS MY3 (2016) MY2 (2015) MY1 (2014) IPnoLS MYO (2014) Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T P -all T Pnol-S P -all T P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Acer rubrum red maple Tree 7 6 4 18 4 1 Alnus serrulata hazel alder Shrub 22 34 38 45 71 25 Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 14 14 15 15 15 18 18 18 19 19 19 9 9 9 9 9 9 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree 4 1 7 1 Carya hickory Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 Carya alba mockernut hickory Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 Carya glabra pignut hickory Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree 1 Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 Crataegus hawthorn Tree 1 Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Fagus grandifolia American beech Tree 5 5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 1 Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 3 4 2 Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 11 8 8 11 12 12 17 13 13 151 20 20 23 20 20 201 24 24 24 Malus apple Tree I 1 1 Nyssa tupelo Tree 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 9 9 9 4 4 4 Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Oxydendrum arboreum sourwood Tree 1 1 Pinus strobus eastern white pine Tree 14 3 Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 12 Pinus virginiana Virginia pine Tree 41 7 11 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 2 21 2 2 2 4 4 4 37 37 42 35 35 36 38 38 46 39 39 40 27 27 27 27 27 27 Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 5 5 5 6 6 6 8 8 8 40 40 40 Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 Quercus coccinea scarlet oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 41 4 4 4 4 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 3 3 3 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 6 6 6 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 4 4 4 7 7 7 10 10 10 14 14 14 17 17 17 Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 6 6 6 28 28 28 37 37 37 46 46 46 50 50 50 25 25 25 2 2 2 Quercus shumardii Shumard's oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Salix nigra black willow Tree 2 3 Unknown IShrub or Tree I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 21 2 2 Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 71 7 7 91 91 10 91 9 36 71 71 14 1101 110 176 1321 1321 204 1531 1531 225 1701 1701 281 1241 1241 162 1341 134 142 1 1 1 1 15 15 15 15 15 15 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 31 31 31 51 51 61 41 4 7 2 2 3 12 12 18 14 14 22 15 15 19 14 14 21 13 13 19 121 12 15 283.3 283.3 283.3 364.2 364.2 404.7 364.2 364.2 1457 283.3 283.3 566.6 296.8 296.8 474.8 356.1 356.1 550.4 412.8 412.8 607 458.6 458.6 758.1 334.5 334.5 437.1 361.5 361.5 383.1 Color for Density Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes P -all = Planting including livestakes T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes T includes natural recruits APPENDIX D STREAM SURVEY DATA Cross-section Plots Longitudinal Profile Plots Substrate Plots Tables lOa-f. Baseline Stream Data Summary Tables l la -f. Monitoring Data Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 1, Riffle Reach UT 1-4 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.0 95.45 1.3 95.50 2.5 95.39 3.4 94.82 4.4 94.43 5.3 94.25 6.0 94.25 7.1 94.20 8.2 94.21 9.7 94.23 10.6 94.30 11.4 94.50 12.2 94.58 13.3 95.02 14.2 95.15 15.4 95.35 17.1 95.38 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 95.2 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 8.1 Bankfull Width: 11.6 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 96.2 Flood Prone Width: 100.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.0 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 W / D Ratio: 16.6 Entrenchment Ratio: 8.6 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Stream Type E Site Elevation Martins Creek II 96.12 2.0 96.00 Project Number: 92633 Date: t i d l Field Crew: XS ID 6.8 XS - 2, Riffle 7.7 94.66 8.8 Reach 10.0 94.64 10.6 94.65 11.5 94.65 12.4 94.65 13.3 94.82 14.2 95.15 15.4 95.59 16.5 95.67 17.5 95.79 XS 2 Looking Upstream Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-4 XS - 2, Station 14+'72, Riffle 97 ------------------------------------------------------------------ 96 0 ti ----- Banldidl W 95 -----Flood Prone Area MY -004/1/14 MY -w 9/10/14 MY -027/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 94 MY -043/7/17 0 10 MT -054/3/18 20 Station (feet) Station Elevation 0.0 96.12 2.0 96.00 2.9 UT 1-4 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.0 96.12 2.0 96.00 2.9 95.91 4.2 95.56 5.5 95.00 6.8 94.70 7.7 94.66 8.8 94.56 10.0 94.64 10.6 94.65 11.5 94.65 12.4 94.65 13.3 94.82 14.2 95.15 15.4 95.59 16.5 95.67 17.5 95.79 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: �U96.7 Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: 100.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.1 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 W / D Ratio: 16.0 Entrenchment Ratio: 8.5 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 3, Riffle Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.0 96.84 0.9 96.84 2.1 96.76 2.6 96.44 3.6 96.32 4.0 96.10 4.5 95.97 5.1 95.88 5.6 95.89 6.1 95.94 6.9 95.98 7.5 96.01 8.3 96.08 8.7 96.18 9.3 96.48 9.8 96.63 10.5 96.74 11.3 96.74 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 96.5 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 2.9 Bankfull Width: 7.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 97.1 Flood Prone Width: 100.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 W / D Ratio: 16.9 Entrenchment Ratio: 14.3 Bank Height Ratio: 1.2 Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 4, Pool Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.2 96.8 1.2 96.9 2.4 96.6 3.2 96.2 3.8 95.4 4.5 95.3 5.2 95.1 6.0 95.4 6.7 95.7 7.3 96.0 7.7 96.2 8.3 96.5 9.0 96.4 9.9 96.7 10.7 96.9 11.6 97.0 12.9 97.1 0 96 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: FNA Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.6 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 W / D Ratio: NA Entrenchment Ratio: NA Bank Height Ratio: EAOL1.0 97 XS 4 Looking Upstream Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2 XS - 4 Station 16+03 Pool 98 97 .� -------------------------------------- - --------- m 5 0 96 ' ----- Banl Hl ti ----- Flood Prone Area W MY -004/1/14 95 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -027/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 94 MY -045/18/17 0 10 MY -054/3/18 Station (feet) Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 5, Riffle Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.0 97.34 1.3 97.48 2.5 97.35 3.4 97.05 4.2 96.40 5.0 96.33 5.6 96.42 6.1 96.32 6.5 96.45 7.4 96.57 8.1 96.66 8.5 96.83 8.9 97.14 9.5 97.27 10.2 97.36 10.9 97.45 12.5 97.53 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 97.3 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 4.0 Bankfull Width: 6.7 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 98.2 Flood Prone Width: 100.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 W / D Ratio: 11.2 Entrenchment Ratio: 14.9 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 t XS 5 Looking Upstream Stream Type E R•.. � Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 6, Pool Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.00 97.74 1.77 97.85 2.73 97.87 3.45 96.57 4.30 95.60 4.95 95.28 6.42 94.84 7.36 95.31 8.11 95.71 8.87 95.92 9.47 96.25 10.35 96.81 11.17 96.75 12.21 96.85 13.05 96.86 14.32 97.05 16.63 97.31 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: .8 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:17NA 9 Banldull Width: 9 Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: A Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.9 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.1 W / D Ratio: NA Entrenchment Ratio: NA Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Stream Type E Site ins Creek II Mart 92633 XS ID XS - 7, Pool Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler 5.12 96.73 5.83 96.81 7.49 96.99 8.04 97.20 8.46 97.46 9.10 97.54 9.72 97.90 10.47 98.61 11.64 98.40 12.52 98.32 13.72 98.41 n i XS 7 Looking Upstream Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2 XS - 7, Station 10+75, Pool 100 99 98 -- ---------- --------------------------- ----------------------- ---------- 0 ti 97 - ----- eaNdWl W ----- Flood Prone Area 96 MY-004/1/14 m1Y-o] 9nona MY-02 v2vls MY-03 3/23/16 95 nn-o45/1.17 0 10 MY-05 4/3na Station (feet) Station ins Creek II Pro'ect Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 7, Pool Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.20 98.62 2.26 98.78 3.51 98.81 3.97 97.80 4.56 96.60 5.12 96.73 5.83 96.81 7.49 96.99 8.04 97.20 8.46 97.46 9.10 97.54 9.72 97.90 10.47 98.61 11.64 98.40 12.52 98.32 13.72 98.41 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 98.1 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 5.5 Bankfull Width: 6.0 Flood Prone Area Elevation)irl.o Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio: Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 8, Riffle Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.2 99.92 1.9 99.86 3.6 99.75 4.0 99.72 4.6 99.50 5.1 99.31 5.5 99.28 5.9 99.27 6.4 99.22 6.8 99.58 7.2 99.77 8.2 99.86 9.2 99.93 10.9 100.00 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 99.9 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: Bankfull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: Flood Prone Width: Max Depth at Bankfull: j64 Mean Depth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio Entrenchment Ratio: Bank Height Ratio: Stream Type E Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 9, Pool Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation -0.30 101.61 1.29 101.74 2.70 101.72 3.57 101.38 4.43 99.51 5.29 99.59 6.57 99.82 7.09 100.64 7.97 100.89 8.93 100.91 9.90 100.93 10.82 101.15 11.66 101.58 13.01 101.20 14.47 101.27 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 101.2 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 5.4 Bankfull Width: 7.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA Flood Prone Width: NA Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.7 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 W / D Ratio: NA Entrenchment Ratio: NA Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 XS 9 Looking Upstream Stream Type E Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 10, Pool Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 2 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.00 105.73 1.29 105.75 3.49 105.66 4.40 105.36 5.59 105.06 5.67 104.95 6.45 104.77 6.85 104.78 7.43 104.85 8.23 104.99 8.90 105.20 9.63 105.36 10.33 105.66 11.19 105.69 12.81 105.73 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 105.7 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 3.5 Bankfull Width: 6.8 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA Flood Prone Width: NA Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 W / D Ratio: NA Entrenchment Ratio: NA Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 XS 10 Looking Upstream Stream Type E Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 11, Riffle Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 1 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.0 113.88 1.8 113.86 3.9 113.62 4.8 113.30 5.6 113.35 6.3 113.30 6.8 113.31 7.6 113.27 8.2 113.25 8.7 113.46 10.1 113.86 11.4 114.01 12.8 114.23 14.0 114.52 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 113.8 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 2.5 Bankfull Width: 7.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 114.4 Flood Prone Width: 25.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.3 W / D Ratio: 21.9 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.4 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Stream Type E Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 12, Riffle Reach UT 1- 3, Reach 1 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.0 125.18 1.5 124.94 3.0 124.89 3.8 124.63 4.4 124.45 5.0 124.34 5.4 124.34 6.0 124.46 6.6 124.46 7.2 124.45 7.9 124.77 8.6 124.94 9.5 125.34 10.4 125.51 12.3 125.61 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 124.9 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 1.9 Bankfull Width: 5.7 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 125.5 Flood Prone Width: 14.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.6 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.3 W / D Ratio: 17.1 Entrenchment Ratio: 2.5 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Stream Type E Site Elevation Martins Creek II 99.76 1.6 99.71 Project Number: 92633 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: XS ID 4.9 XS - 13, Riffle 5.6 r 6.1 Reach 6.7 98.25 7.4 u 8.0 98.72 8.6 98.75 9.5 99.05 9.9 99.51 10.7 99.56 12.1 99.57 12.5 99.64 13.5 99.65 a... r h nr l f� ' X513 Looking Upstream Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4 XS -13, Station 12+38, Riffle 101 100 ____________________________________________________________________ 0 ti ----- Banldidl W99 --------------------- ��----------� Flood Prone Area MY -004/1/14 MY -W 9/10/14 MY -027/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 98 MY -043/7/17 0 10 MY -054/3/18 Station (feet) Station Elevation 0.2 99.76 1.6 99.71 UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.2 99.76 1.6 99.71 2.4 99.54 3.2 99.45 4.2 99.06 4.9 99.07 5.6 98.51 6.1 98.37 6.7 98.25 7.4 98.15 8.0 98.72 8.6 98.75 9.5 99.05 9.9 99.51 10.7 99.56 12.1 99.57 12.5 99.64 13.5 99.65 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: Banldull Cross -Sectional Area: Banldull Width: Flood Prone Area Elevation: 1V25'o Flood Prone Width: Max Deth at Banldull: Mean Deth at Bankfull: W / D Ratio: 9.2 Entrenchment Ratio: 5.6 Bank Height Ratio: 1.4 Site Elevation Martins Creek II 92633 XS ID XS - 14, Riffle Project UT 1, Reach 4 Date: t Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler 4.2 100.02 4.9 j. 5.2 99.85 5.8 99.77 6.4 99.76 6.8 99.79 7.4 99.84 8.2 99.91 8.5 100.11 9.7 100.62 10.5 1` "•r:' s' 11.1 100.75 12.2 100.71 ,. f- k u w XS 14 Looking Upstream Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4 XS -14, Station 11+37, Riffle 102 ------------------------------------------------------------- 101 ti ----- Banldidl W 100 ----- Flood Prone Area MY -004/1/14 MY -O] 9/10/14 MY -027/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 99 MY -043/7/17 0 10 MY -054/3/18 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS - 14, Riffle Reach UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation -1.2 101.23 0.3 101.15 1.3 100.97 2.7 100.69 3.0 100.47 4.2 100.02 4.9 99.81 5.2 99.85 5.8 99.77 6.4 99.76 6.8 99.79 7.4 99.84 8.2 99.91 8.5 100.11 9.7 100.62 10.5 100.60 11.1 100.75 12.2 100.71 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 100.5 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 3.2 Bankfull Width: 6.4 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 101.2 Flood Prone Width: 25.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 W / D Ratio: 12.8 Entrenchment RatioId : 3.9 Bank Height Ratio: 1.1 Site Elevation Martins Creek II 92633 XS ID XS -15, Pool Project UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler 4.53 100.23 4.99 100.25 5.52 100.17 5.87 99.86 6.17 100.04 6.73 99.93 7.29 99.98 8.14 100.57 9.14 101.06 10.44 100.86 12.71 100.90 14.90 100.92 16.89 100.92 x a w , V-4 h 1 P� nai - _y�ad XS 15 Looking Upstream Stream Typ E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4 XS -15, Station 10+21, Pool 102 101 ��----------------- �� - - - - ------ 5 0 100 ti ----- eankr n W ----- Flood Prone An;a 99 MY -00 4/1/14 MY -O] 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 98 MY -04 3/7/17 0 10 MI. 4/3/18 2'0 Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS -15, Pool Reach UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.00 100.93 1.18 101.09 2.00 101.20 2.90 101.17 3.66 101.06 4.53 100.23 4.99 100.25 5.52 100.17 5.87 99.86 6.17 100.04 6.73 99.93 7.29 99.98 8.14 100.57 9.14 101.06 10.44 100.86 12.71 100.90 14.90 100.92 16.89 100.92 SUMMARY DATA 7 Bankfull Elevation: 101.0 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 4.9 Bankfull Width: 13.9 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA Flood Prone Width: NA Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.2 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.4 W / D Ratio: NA Entrenchment Ratio: NA Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Site Elevation tins Creek II Marge 102.01 1.0 102.05 Project Number: 92633 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: XS ID 4.2 XS - 16, Riffle 4.5 100.75 '1 Reach 5.8 100.73 6.4 100.79 7.1 100.89 7.6 101.00 7.8 101.22 8.9 101.74 9.9 101.97 10.7 102.15 12.4 102.04 2 " 8 - $'. 1 .. r 1. 7, X516 Looking Upstream Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4 XS -16, Station 09+53, Riffle 104 103 --------------------------------------------------------------- 0 102 fmmmnaffift -- -- ----- Banldoll ti W ----- Flood Prone Area 101 MY -004/1/14 MY -O] 9/10/14 MY -027/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 100 MY -043/7/17 0 10 MY -054/3/18 Station (feet) Station Elevation 0.0 102.01 1.0 102.05 UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.0 102.01 1.0 102.05 1.8 101.91 2.4 101.79 3.4 101.41 4.2 100.97 4.5 100.75 5.1 100.73 5.8 100.73 6.4 100.79 7.1 100.89 7.6 101.00 7.8 101.22 8.9 101.74 9.9 101.97 10.7 102.15 12.4 102.04 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 101.8 Banldull Cross -Sectional Area: 4.7 Banldull Width: 6.9 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 102.9 Flood Prone Width: 25.0 Max Depth at Banldull: 1.1 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.7 W / D Ratio: 10.1 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.6 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Site Elevation Martins Creek II 92633 XS ID XS -17, Pool Project UT 1, Reach 4 Date: :. is Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler 5.91 105.00 6.67 104.99 7.30 104.93 8.03 104.65 8.95 f k _•' 1 1. 104.42 10.62 104.26 11.30 104.42 11.86 104.47 12.42 106.07 13.13 106.34 14.16 106.45 15.69 106.48 ~ ' dY�'� ✓ Y� 5 l X517 Looking Upstream FIS Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4 XS -17, Station 07+41, Pool 107 106 ---------------------------------------- ------------ 105 0 104 ----- eaNdWl W ----- Flood Prone Area 103 MY -004/1/14 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -02 7/22/15 MY -o3 3/23/16 102 MY -043/7/n 0 10 MY -os 4/3na Station (feet) Station Elevation Number: 92633 XS ID XS -17, Pool Reach UT 1, Reach 4 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Perkinson, Butler Station Elevation 0.00 105.96 1.68 105.95 3.46 105.84 4.10 105.70 5.10 105.11 5.91 105.00 6.67 104.99 7.30 104.93 8.03 104.65 8.95 104.59 9.79 104.42 10.62 104.26 11.30 104.42 11.86 104.47 12.42 106.07 13.13 106.34 14.16 106.45 15.69 106.48 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 105.9 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 9.5 Bankfull Width: 10.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: NA Flood Prone Width: NA Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.7 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 W / D Ratio: NA Entrenchment Ratio: NA Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Site Martins Creek II Project Number: 92633 XS ID EmPerkinson, XS - 18, Riffle Reach MC UT 1, Reach 2 Date: 4/3/2018 Field Crew: Butler Station Elevation 0.0 75.53 1.5 75.51 2.4 75.50 3.2 75.26 3.8 74.95 4.8 74.66 5.4 74.56 6.2 74.36 7.2 74.29 7.4 74.55 8.6 74.52 8.9 74.52 9.5 74.55 10.5 74.90 11.8 75.29 12.6 75.42 13.4 75.52 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 75.2 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 4.5 Bankfull Width: 8.2 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 76.1 Flood Prone Width: 25.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 0.9 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.5 W / D Ratio: 14.9 Entrenchment Ratio: 3.0 Bank Height Ratio: 1.1 Stream Type E Site Elevation Martins Creek II 102.50 1.3 102.54 Project Number: 92633 2.9 102.49 r. XS ID 741'erkinson, XS - 19, Riffle 4.9 101.23 5.8 Reach 6.4 MC UT 1, Reach 2 7.0 .. 7.6 Date: 8.0 4/3/2018 8.5 101.40 9.0 Field Crew: 10.2 102.09 11.1 102.40 fJes yr 102.99 12.2 103.20 13.0 103.21 } _ 103.32 f- �. y3' -li►� r. X519 Looking Upstream Stream Type E Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633 Stream Reach MC UT 1 Reach 2 XS -19, Station 04+37, Riffle 105 104 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 103 102 ----- eaNdWl W ----- Flood Prone Area 101 MY -004/1/14 MY -01 9/10/14 MY -027/22/15 MY -03 3/23/16 100 MY -043/7/17 0 10 MY -054/3/18 Station (feet) Station Elevation 0.0 102.50 1.3 102.54 2.1 102.55 2.9 102.49 3.4 Butler Station Elevation 0.0 102.50 1.3 102.54 2.1 102.55 2.9 102.49 3.4 102.19 4.4 101.89 4.9 101.23 5.8 100.97 6.4 101.04 7.0 101.39 7.6 101.23 8.0 101.24 8.5 101.40 9.0 101.82 10.2 102.09 11.1 102.40 11.9 102.99 12.2 103.20 13.0 103.21 13.7 103.32 SUMMARY DATA Bankfull Elevation: 102.5 Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area: 7.3 Bankfull Width: 8.9 Flood Prone Area Elevation: 104.1 Flood Prone Width: 25.0 Max Depth at Bankfull: 1.6 Mean Depth at Bankfull: 0.8 W / D Ratio: 10.9 Entrenchment Ratio: 2.8 Bank Height Ratio: 1.0 Name Martins Creek II UT 1 - 3 Reaeb 1 and 2, Station 00+00 - 10+00 Number 92633 4/3/18 130 125 120 2014 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Station Perkinson, Butler Water ElevatioE 1016.0 2014 98.3 996.9 Year 0 Monitoring \Survey 99.0 Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 996.5 98.7 99.1 990.2 97.9 99.1 983.6 97.5 99.1 977.2 98.1 99.1 972.7 99.1 99.4 958.7 99.2 99.7 952.1 99.6 100.0 948.5 98.7 100.0 944.4 98.6 100.0 941.0 98.6 100.0 937.6 99.7 100.0 921.8 100.2 100.4 919.2 99.3 100.4 914.8 99.2 100.3 911.0 100.1 100.5 889.7 100.7 101.1 882.6 99.7 101.2 876.7 99.3 101.2 867.3 100.1 101.2 861.5 100.7 101.3 846.0 101.4 101.8 839.0 100.2 101.8 829.8 100.4 101.8 824.9 101.5 101.9 814.6 102.0 102.4 796.9 102.4 102.9 792.1 101.8 102.9 130 125 120 2014 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 1016.0 98.2 98.3 996.9 98.6 99.0 991.3 97.7 99.0 980.6 97.9 99.0 973.8 99.1 99.4 952.9 99.6 100.0 949.0 99.0 100.0 942.2 98.7 100.0 941.0 99.5 100.0 922.8 99.8 100.4 919.3 98.7 100.3 917.1 98.9 100.3 913.2 100.0 100.3 890.4 100.7 101.1 884.2 99.8 101.1 877.4 99.4 101.2 867.7 100.2 101.1 863.0 101.0 101.2 846.9 101.5 101.9 839.9 100.8 101.9 830.6 99.7 102.0 825.8 101.4 102.0 797.2 102.3 102.8 791.6 101.8 102.9 776.1 101.5 102.9 771.2 102.7 103.0 743.5 102.8 103.5 Station 2015 Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE Station 2016 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevatior 2017 Year 4 Monitoring Station Bed Elevation \Survey Water ElevatioE 2018 Year 5 Monitoring Station Bed Elevation \Survey Water ElevatioE 1016.9 98.2 98.5 1001.5 98.6 99.2 1021.5 97.6 98.3 1008.5 98.1 98.6 992.6 98.4 99.1 992.5 97.6 99.2 996.5 98.6 99.1 989.4 98.7 99.3 990.2 97.4 99.2 985.0 97.3 99.3 992.0 97.6 99.1 983.8 97.9 99.4 979.8 97.7 99.2 977.9 98.8 99.4 984.2 97.7 99.1 976.5 98.0 99.4 976.9 98.9 99.4 956.9 99.6 100.2 978.6 98.7 99.1 971.9 98.0 99.4 954.7 99.4 100.1 952.1 98.6 100.2 956.5 99.5 100.0 967.9 98.8 99.5 951.8 98.8 100.1 945.2 98.8 100.2 953.5 98.4 100.0 946.7 99.5 100.0 943.5 98.7 100.1 941.4 99.7 100.3 946.8 98.5 100.1 944.2 98.5 100.0 941.6 99.5 100.1 926.5 99.9 100.6 941.4 99.7 100.1 936.3 98.0 100.1 925.3 99.9 100.4 923.3 99.0 100.6 927.3 100.0 100.4 931.9 99.6 100.1 921.4 99.0 100.5 920.1 98.9 100.6 922.8 99.2 100.4 917.2 99.9 100.4 917.1 98.7 100.4 915.6 100.0 100.6 918.6 99.1 100.4 914.6 99.0 100.4 914.0 100.0 101.2 895.4 100.7 101.3 915.3 100.1 100.5 908.9 99.3 100.4 889.8 100.4 101.3 887.1 99.2 101.4 891.8 100.6 101.2 905.7 99.9 100.6 886.8 99.7 101.3 877.6 99.7 101.3 886.9 99.6 101.2 884.0 100.6 101.3 875.5 99.7 101.3 870.3 100.3 101.4 876.6 99.8 101.2 879.3 99.8 101.3 869.0 100.2 101.3 848.3 101.2 102.1 872.0 100.4 101.2 872.2 99.2 101.3 845.9 101.1 102.1 842.8 100.3 102.2 844.2 101.3 101.9 864.9 100.0 101.3 835.2 100.0 102.1 834.9 99.3 102.1 840.9 100.2 101.9 858.2 100.8 101.4 832.5 100.4 102.1 830.1 101.4 102.2 835.7 100.0 101.9 843.2 101.4 101.9 828.3 101.4 102.1 802.5 102.3 103.0 831.4 101.3 102.0 835.1 100.6 102.1 799.1 102.3 103.1 797.4 101.6 103.1 803.0 102.4 102.8 826.3 100.1 102.1 795.5 101.6 103.1 785.9 101.5 103.2 797.0 101.6 102.8 821.8 100.9 102.1 779.4 101.5 103.1 776.8 100.7 103.3 785.3 101.6 102.9 819.0 101.3 102.2 775.9 101.9 103.2 771.4 102.2 103.3 777.5 102.1 102.9 793.1 102.5 103.0 755.2 102.8 103.4 748.7 102.7 103.6 755.5 102.7 103.1 789.1 101.6 103.1 722.0 103.8 104.3 744.4 101.6 103.6 749.2 103.0 103.3 778.8 101.6 103.2 Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 5 (2018) Profile - UT 1-3 Reach 1 and 2, Station 00+00 to 10+00 95 ; '1 ' 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (feet) -Year 0(2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2(2015) Bed -Year 3(2016) Bed -Year 4(2017) Bed -TOB ♦Year 5(2018) Bed -Year 5(2018) Water Surface 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0161 0.0162 0.0174 0.0170 0.0166 0.0159 Riffle Length 20 20 22 19 21 19 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0185 0.0209 0.0163 0.0197 0.0142 0.0187 Pool Length 14 16 13 16 15 14 Pool to Pool Spacing 34 34 35 33 33 32 95 ; '1 ' 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (feet) -Year 0(2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2(2015) Bed -Year 3(2016) Bed -Year 4(2017) Bed -TOB ♦Year 5(2018) Bed -Year 5(2018) Water Surface et Name Martins Creek I1 t UT 1 - 3 Reach 2, Station 10+00 - 20+00 et Number 92633 4/3/18 Perkinson, Butler 2014 Year 0 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 1855.8 95.4 95.9 1852.5 94.6 95.8 1848.3 94.5 95.9 1844.3 95.3 95.9 1841.9 94.9 95.9 1834.0 94.4 95.8 1830.6 95.1 95.9 1814.5 95.4 96.0 1799.6 95.4 95.9 1794.8 95.2 96.0 1784.4 94.9 96.0 1777.9 95.1 96.0 1770.2 95.6 96.0 1746.1 95.6 96.0 1741.1 93.9 96.0 1732.1 94.5 96.1 1726.8 95.5 96.0 1690.1 95.8 96.2 1684.6 95.4 96.2 1673.3 95.1 96.2 1669.0 95.7 96.2 1656.8 95.9 96.2 1643.3 95.9 96.3 1641.8 94.6 96.3 1634.6 94.5 96.3 1630.6 95.8 96.3 1606.4 96.0 96.4 103 102 101 100 `m 99 w w c 98 0 w 97 w 96 95 94 2014 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 1856.9 94.6 95.7 1853.2 94.5 95.7 1850.5 95.3 95.8 1828.7 95.1 95.7 1806.0 95.5 95.8 1797.1 95.0 95.8 1784.6 95.0 95.8 1775.5 95.6 95.8 1752.2 95.6 95.9 1746.3 94.1 95.9 1738.4 94.2 95.9 1731.8 95.6 95.9 1694.6 95.8 96.1 1688.2 95.3 96.1 1681.4 95.0 96.2 1673.0 95.6 96.1 1646.9 95.9 96.1 1644.5 94.0 96.2 1641.4 94.7 96.1 1635.7 95.8 96.1 1610.2 96.0 96.3 1608.3 94.6 96.4 1599.6 95.1 96.3 1596.1 96.0 96.3 1570.6 96.0 96.5 1563.3 95.0 96.5 1556.6 94.7 96.5 Year Station 2015 2 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevatior 2016 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 2017 Year 4 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 2018 Year 5 Monitoring Station Bed Elevation \Survey Water Ele 1829.0 95.1 96.0 1844.9 95.2 95.9 1852.4 94.6 95.8 1842.4 94.7 95.9 1791.8 95.5 96.0 1843.2 95.2 95.9 1847.9 95.4 95.8 1837.7 95.0 95.9 1784.6 95.0 96.0 1839.7 94.6 95.9 1805.3 95.4 95.8 1830.4 95.0 95.9 1766.2 95.0 96.1 1835.7 94.3 95.9 1796.8 95.0 95.8 1827.6 94.5 95.9 1761.4 95.4 96.1 1829.5 95.1 95.9 1785.4 94.9 95.8 1820.9 94.8 95.9 1736.6 95.5 96.1 1799.4 95.3 95.9 1775.6 95.5 95.8 1817.1 95.0 95.9 1732.7 94.9 96.1 1789.2 94.6 96.0 1749.7 95.6 95.9 1795.5 95.6 96.1 1722.3 94.7 96.1 1778.8 94.8 96.0 1744.4 94.1 95.9 1790.7 95.3 96.1 1719.2 95.6 96.1 1772.3 95.4 96.0 1736.7 94.4 95.9 1771.6 95.0 96.1 1682.4 95.8 96.3 1747.1 95.5 96.1 1730.7 95.5 95.9 1767.3 95.1 96.2 1674.4 95.1 96.3 1741.3 94.0 96.1 1695.4 95.8 96.1 1763.9 95.5 96.1 1665.0 95.0 96.3 1734.4 93.7 96.0 1687.5 95.4 96.1 1740.2 95.6 96.2 1660.4 95.6 96.3 1727.7 95.4 96.1 1680.2 95.0 96.1 1735.6 95.0 96.2 1634.7 95.8 96.3 1712.4 95.5 96.2 1670.9 95.6 96.0 1728.1 94.1 96.3 1633.5 94.7 96.4 1690.1 95.7 96.3 1646.5 95.7 96.1 1724.7 94.5 96.2 1623.5 94.9 96.3 1684.1 95.2 96.3 1641.8 94.8 96.1 1721.7 95.6 96.2 1622.6 95.8 96.3 1674.8 94.7 96.2 1635.0 94.7 96.1 1712.4 95.8 96.3 1599.6 95.9 96.4 1668.4 95.6 96.3 1632.5 95.8 96.1 1687.0 95.9 96.4 1595.8 94.8 96.4 1643.4 95.7 96.3 1608.0 95.9 96.3 1679.4 94.8 96.4 1588.4 95.3 96.4 1641.7 94.7 96.3 1605.2 94.9 96.3 1671.8 95.0 96.4 1583.4 95.9 96.4 1634.2 94.8 96.3 1596.6 94.7 96.2 1665.7 95.2 96.4 1557.9 95.9 96.6 1629.6 95.9 96.3 1592.4 95.9 96.3 1660.6 95.7 96.5 1552.4 95.2 96.6 1609.2 95.9 96.4 1567.5 95.9 96.3 1652.2 95.8 96.4 1542.8 95.2 96.6 1603.4 94.8 96.4 1561.8 95.1 96.4 1635.4 95.8 96.5 1538.4 95.8 96.6 1597.3 95.0 96.4 1554.2 95.0 96.4 1632.2 94.9 96.5 1507.0 96.1 97.0 1591.7 95.9 96.4 1547.8 95.9 96.4 1624.6 94.8 96.5 1501.9 95.3 96.9 1566.1 96.1 96.6 1516.8 96.3 96.9 1620.4 95.9 96.5 1485.2 95.7 96.9 1558.7 Q4.7 96.6 1509.9 Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 5 (2018) Profile - UT 1-3 Reach 2, Station 10+00 to 20+00 93 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 Distance (feet) -Year 0(2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2(2015) Bed -Year 3(2016) Bed -Year 4(2017) Bed -TOB tYear 5(2018) Bed -Year 5(2018) Water Surface 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0161 0.0162 0.0174 0.0170 0.0166 0.0159 Riffle Length 20 20 22 19 21 19 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0185 0.0209 0.0163 0.0197 0.0142 0.0187 Pool Length 14 16 13 16 15 14 Pool to Pool Spacing 34 34 35 33 33 32 93 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 Distance (feet) -Year 0(2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2(2015) Bed -Year 3(2016) Bed -Year 4(2017) Bed -TOB tYear 5(2018) Bed -Year 5(2018) Water Surface I Name Martins Creek II Station 2016 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 00+00 - 06+00 I Number 92633 600.5 92.0 4/3/18 607.3 90.4 Perkinson, Butler 601.1 90.1 2014 601.0 Year 0 Monitoring \Survey 575.8 Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation 603.4 90.7 91.5 601.2 92.0 92.2 583.1 92.7 92.9 575.4 92.8 93.0 573.4 92.1 93.0 570.9 92.3 93.0 569.9 93.7 93.8 556.2 94.0 94.3 544.5 94.8 95.0 539.5 94.1 95.0 537.3 95.2 95.3 525.6 95.9 96.2 517.2 96.1 96.3 514.1 95.6 96.3 510.6 95.6 96.3 507.6 96.7 97.1 495.4 97.8 98.0 478.4 98.7 99.0 476.3 97.8 99.0 473.4 97.7 99.0 472.2 99.6 99.7 462.6 99.9 100.1 460.0 99.4 100.1 457.1 99.2 100.1 455.9 100.3 100.4 445.4 100.6 100.9 443.4 100.1 100.9 130 125 120 S. `m Z 115 `m w w 110 c m v w 105 100 95 90 0 2014 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 603.8 91.2 600.7 90.5 597.8 92.0 582.4 92.2 572.9 92.7 570.7 91.9 568.5 91.9 566.6 93.5 540.0 94.7 536.8 93.9 534.7 95.2 523.2 95.8 514.2 96.0 511.5 95.7 96.1 508.4 95.5 96.1 505.3 96.8 493.9 97.6 97.7 477.0 98.7 473.3 97.6 98.8 470.9 97.5 98.8 469.7 99.4 459.3 99.6 456.5 99.1 99.6 454.5 99.0 99.6 453.8 100.2 443.5 100.6 441.4 100.0 100.7 100 Station 2015 Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station 2016 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 2017 Year 4 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 2018 Year S Monitoring Station Bed Elevation \Survey Water ElevatioE 600.5 92.0 92.0 607.3 90.4 91.2 601.1 90.1 91.2 601.0 89.6 90.6 575.8 92.7 93.1 602.0 90.0 91.2 600.3 92.0 92.1 599.9 91.6 91.7 572.8 92.1 93.1 600.2 92.1 92.2 593.1 91.8 92.1 577.2 92.5 92.8 569.7 92.3 93.0 592.6 91.6 92.2 591.3 91.7 92.2 574.1 92.0 92.8 568.7 93.6 93.7 588.4 91.4 92.2 587.5 91.5 92.2 571.0 91.9 92.8 541.7 94.6 94.9 586.1 92.2 92.5 585.4 92.1 92.3 569.7 93.2 93.3 538.1 94.0 94.9 579.5 93.0 93.3 577.9 92.9 93.2 556.2 93.1 93.5 536.0 95.2 95.3 575.4 92.3 93.3 574.6 92.3 93.3 547.1 94.2 94.5 523.2 95.9 96.2 571.6 92.2 93.3 571.2 92.1 93.2 542.0 93.7 94.5 515.5 96.0 96.2 570.4 93.6 93.8 569.9 93.6 93.7 537.9 93.8 94.5 512.6 95.5 96.2 565.4 93.9 94.0 562.1 93.5 94.0 536.9 94.8 94.9 509.3 95.4 96.2 564.3 93.4 94.0 560.0 93.2 93.9 528.6 94.9 95.1 507.6 97.0 96.9 557.9 93.1 94.0 556.5 93.2 93.9 526.5 94.5 95.1 495.3 97.8 97.9 555.7 93.9 94.1 554.2 94.0 94.1 523.3 94.6 95.1 477.2 98.6 98.9 546.7 94.6 94.9 545.4 94.5 94.9 518.9 95.5 95.6 472.7 97.3 98.9 543.4 94.0 94.9 541.4 94.0 94.8 514.8 95.3 95.8 471.3 99.5 99.5 539.5 93.9 94.9 537.7 94.0 94.9 513.5 95.2 95.7 461.4 99.7 100.0 537.1 95.2 95.4 536.5 95.1 95.2 509.4 95.0 95.7 458.2 99.4 100.0 530.0 95.3 95.6 528.3 95.0 95.5 507.1 96.2 96.5 455.7 100.3 100.3 527.8 94.8 95.7 525.9 94.8 95.5 499.7 96.3 96.7 440.9 101.1 101.2 523.8 94.9 95.7 523.5 94.8 95.5 498.5 96.1 96.7 429.7 101.4 101.8 521.7 95.6 95.8 518.6 95.8 96.1 495.9 96.0 96.7 427.0 100.9 101.8 516.2 95.8 96.2 515.2 95.8 96.1 493.7 96.8 97.0 425.3 102.2 102.2 515.0 95.6 96.2 513.4 95.5 96.2 476.5 97.9 98.3 409.3 102.5 102.8 510.9 95.5 96.2 509.8 95.6 96.3 472.8 97.1 98.3 404.3 101.5 102.8 508.0 96.7 97.1 507.4 96.7 96.9 471.6 99.1 99.2 400.6 103.5 103.6 503.6 96.6 97.1 502.2 96.8 97.0 462.5 99.0 99.4 381.5 103.9 104.2 500.9 96.2 97.1 59512 Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 5 (2018) Profile - MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 00+00 to 06+00 -Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed 200 -Year 2 (2015) Bed 300 Distance (feet) -Year 3 (2016) Bed -Year 4 (2017) Bed rn c o_ m w w 0 Q NA- No water in channel during field surveys 400 500 600 -TOB -*--Year 5 (2018) Bed -Year 5 (2018) Water Surface 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0577 NA* 0.0582 0.0578 0.0576 0.0579 Piffle Length 19 16 17 13 13 15 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0457 NA* 0.0447 0.0386 0.0406 0.0373 Pool Length 6 6 6 8 7 8 Pool to Pool Spacing 25 22 24 21 19 21 NA- No water in channel during field surveys 400 500 600 -TOB -*--Year 5 (2018) Bed -Year 5 (2018) Water Surface A Name Martins Creek II Station Year MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 06+00 - 12+00 A Number 92633 Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 1169.9 4/3/18 58.4 1153.8 Perkinson, Butler 58.9 1138.0 2014 59.3 Year 0 Monitoring \Survey 59.3 Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 1170.7 58.4 58.5 1137.5 59.4 59.6 1134.1 58.7 59.5 1132.5 60.4 60.5 1119.6 60.3 60.6 1116.2 61.8 61.8 1099.7 61.8 62.1 1081.3 62.3 62.4 1077.3 62.2 62.5 1074.5 62.7 62.9 1064.6 63.4 63.3 1049.9 64.3 64.5 1047.7 63.9 64.5 1041.2 63.9 64.5 1040.6 64.8 64.9 1031.8 65.0 65.4 1030.0 65.0 65.4 1026.5 65.0 65.4 1025.8 65.8 65.8 1017.7 65.8 66.0 1013.8 66.0 66.2 1012.6 65.7 66.2 1011.0 66.5 66.7 984.7 67.6 67.9 980.6 67.2 67.9 978.9 68.5 68.7 967.1 69.2 69.4 95 90 85 `m a 80 m v v c 75 O m 7 v w 70 65 60 55 600 700 -Year 0(2014) Bed Year Station 2014 Station Year 1 Monitoring \Survey 2018 Year 5 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 1169.9 58.4 58.4 1153.8 58.8 58.9 1138.0 59.2 59.3 1135.4 58.8 59.3 1133.5 58.7 59.3 1132.4 60.4 1166.4 1124.3 60.2 1134.6 1122.3 60.0 59.5 1118.7 60.3 59.3 1115.6 61.7 57.8 1091.2 62.0 58.7 59.4 1079.4 62.3 59.5 1077.1 62.0 59.5 1075.5 61.9 58.3 1074.1 62.6 1131.3 1068.2 62.8 1132.9 1066.6 62.6 1161.9 1064.6 62.6 1122.9 1063.6 63.2 60.2 1053.6 63.9 60.4 1048.0 64.2 59.0 1044.7 63.7 60.1 1039.2 63.8 60.7 1038.1 64.9 60.4 1027.3 65.1 59.3 1024.5 64.7 1118.1 1023.8 65.7 1120.7 700 -Year 0(2014) Bed Year Station 2015 2 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE Station 2016 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Bed Elevation Water Elevation 2017 Year 4 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 2018 Year 5 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 1175.6 57.7 58.0 1168.6 58.6 58.8 1169.4 58.5 58.6 1169.4 58.1 58.3 1167.4 58.5 1144.7 59.4 59.5 1153.0 58.9 59.1 1166.4 58.1 58.3 1134.6 59.5 1135.7 59.5 59.5 1142.5 59.3 59.5 1165.5 57.8 58.3 1131.7 58.7 59.4 1133.3 58.7 59.5 1137.9 59.0 59.5 1163.8 58.0 58.3 1130.6 60.5 1131.3 60.5 60.6 1132.9 58.9 59.5 1161.9 58.4 58.4 1122.9 60.4 1124.3 60.2 60.7 1131.6 60.4 1143.8 59.0 59.3 1120.3 60.1 1122.0 59.8 60.7 1122.5 60.2 60.4 1141.8 58.9 59.3 1117.4 60.1 1118.1 59.8 60.7 1120.7 59.7 60.5 1134.3 58.6 59.3 1114.0 61.7 1114.8 61.7 61.7 1117.8 59.8 60.5 1133.3 60.1 1094.3 61.9 1098.6 62.0 62.1 1114.0 61.6 61.7 1125.6 60.0 60.1 1077.2 62.3 1082.9 62.6 62.9 1097.1 61.8 62.1 1123.1 59.5 60.0 1074.4 62.1 1078.4 62.3 62.9 1079.1 62.5 62.9 1120.3 59.3 60.0 1072.2 62.6 1074.5 62.1 62.9 1076.1 62.1 62.9 1116.7 61.3 61.3 1066.1 62.8 1073.5 62.7 62.9 1074.7 62.1 62.9 1099.5 61.4 61.7 1063.5 62.7 1062.9 63.3 63.4 1073.2 62.7 62.9 1081.8 62.1 62.4 1061.7 63.3 1054.5 63.6 63.8 1058.1 63.4 63.6 1078.3 61.7 62.5 1052.3 63.9 1053.1 63.4 63.8 1043.1 63.8 63.9 1075.3 62.3 62.5 1046.0 64.3 1047.0 63.3 63.8 1040.1 63.9 64.0 1064.8 62.9 63.0 1042.4 63.9 1040.0 63.8 64.1 1038.1 64.8 64.9 1045.7 63.6 63.6 1038.1 63.9 1038.4 64.9 64.9 1026.2 65.1 65.4 1042.4 63.5 63.6 1036.8 64.7 1028.5 65.3 65.5 1024.1 64.8 65.4 1040.0 64.3 64.5 1025.7 65.2 1023.6 65.7 65.8 1023.2 65.7 65.8 1021.1 65.2 65.4 1022.9 64.8 1018.8 65.6 65.8 1018.0 65.4 65.8 1018.0 64.6 65.4 1022.3 65.8 1015.3 64.9 65.8 1015.2 64.9 65.8 1012.9 64.7 65.4 1014.1 66.0 1010.8 65.1 65.8 1010.8 65.1 65.8 1011.4 66.0 66.2 1010.2 65.4 1009.4 66.4 66.6 1008.5 66.4 66.5 997.2 66.8 66.9 1007.8 66.3 996.5 67.0 67.1 999.0 66.6 66.8 985.9 67.3 67.4 7.7 67 9 983.0677 679 041 671 675 Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 5 (2018) Profile - MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 06+00 to 12+00 800 -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2(2015) Bed On 900 Distance (feet) -Year 3(2016) Bed -Year 4(2017) Bed 1000 -TOB -*-Year 5(2018) Bed NA- No water in channel during field surveys 1100 -Year 5(2018) Water Surface 1200 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0577 NA* 0.0582 0.0578 0.0576 0.0579 Riffle Length 19 16 17 13 13 15 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0457 NA* 0.0447 0.0386 0.0406 0.0373 Pool Length 6 6 6 8 7 8 Pool to Pool Spacing 25.0 22 24 21 19 21 NA- No water in channel during field surveys 1100 -Year 5(2018) Water Surface 1200 Project Name Martins Creek II 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0305 0.0304 0.0305 0.0315 0.0281 0.0297 Riffle Length 17 21 21 Reach UT 1 Reach 3, Station 00+00 - 03+50 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0388 0.0395 0.0310 0.0459 0.0404 0.0412 Pool Length 13 13 14 16 14 14 Pool to Pool Spacing Project Number 92633 44 27 31 34 Date 4/3/18 Crew Perkinson, Butler 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year 0 Monitoring \Survey Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Year 4 Monitoring \Survey Year 5 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE Station Bed Elevation Water Elevatior Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 336.4 91.4 91.5 339.1 91.4 91.5 335.5 91.6 91.7 341.7 91.8 91.9 341.7 91.8 91.9 341.7 91.8 92.0 323.6 91.8 92.1 326.0 91.7 92.0 313.4 92.1 92.5 337.1 91.1 91.9 330.2 91.6 91.9 323.5 91.7 92.0 320.5 90.9 92.1 322.7 91.0 92.0 294.4 92.6 93.0 325.9 91.2 91.9 326.5 91.3 91.9 297.6 92.7 93.0 317.3 91.2 92.0 320.3 91.7 92.0 291.9 92.5 93.0 313.0 91.2 91.9 320.9 91.4 91.9 294.6 92.5 93.1 311.2 92.2 92.6 299.9 92.5 92.8 286.5 92.5 93.0 311.6 91.9 92.2 312.1 91.7 92.0 292.3 92.4 93.0 299.7 92.5 92.8 296.9 92.4 92.8 282.3 93.0 93.3 304.9 92.4 92.7 303.4 92.5 92.7 285.9 93.2 93.6 295.8 92.5 92.9 292.0 92.3 92.8 261.5 93.7 94.0 303.2 92.1 92.7 294.2 92.8 93.0 266.0 94.1 94.3 292.0 92.3 92.8 286.9 92.7 93.0 254.1 93.3 94.0 300.5 92.3 92.7 291.8 92.4 93.1 259.7 93.6 94.3 288.2 92.3 92.8 268.6 93.6 93.8 245.7 93.5 94.0 298.0 92.6 93.0 288.4 92.7 93.1 249.6 93.7 94.3 284.7 92.8 93.1 262.1 93.4 93.8 239.6 93.3 94.0 295.4 92.5 93.0 282.3 93.3 93.6 242.9 93.4 94.3 265.6 93.6 93.8 254.3 93.3 93.8 237.7 94.4 94.8 287.4 92.7 93.3 266.4 94.0 94.3 238.8 94.4 94.5 255.6 93.3 93.8 245.8 93.3 93.8 225.0 94.9 95.2 285.4 93.2 93.5 260.4 93.6 94.3 231.5 94.8 95.0 245.2 93.3 93.8 241.3 92.8 93.8 203.2 95.7 96.0 274.9 93.6 93.8 248.4 93.8 94.3 210.3 95.8 96.1 239.5 93.1 93.8 236.7 94.4 94.7 200.0 95.6 96.0 266.0 93.9 94.2 242.6 93.2 94.3 193.8 96.6 96.9 235.9 94.2 94.9 229.6 94.8 95.0 195.9 95.6 96.1 261.9 93.5 94.2 240.0 94.3 94.4 188.9 96.1 96.9 229.6 94.8 95.3 225.4 94.5 95.1 193.5 96.0 96.3 254.1 93.4 94.3 237.4 93.8 94.4 177.6 95.8 96.9 227.0 94.6 95.3 222.1 94.9 95.1 183.1 96.1 96.5 244.4 93.3 94.3 235.6 94.1 94.6 166.8 96.8 97.1 222.6 94.6 95.3 203.3 95.5 95.7 179.2 96.0 96.5 239.1 93.3 94.3 228.3 94.6 95.0 154.9 97.1 97.5 216.1 95.0 95.3 191.6 96.0 96.2 175.3 95.9 96.5 237.6 94.4 94.6 210.1 95.4 95.7 150.6 96.9 97.5 205.3 95.4 95.8 188.0 95.7 96.3 169.2 96.6 96.9 227.1 94.9 95.3 192.3 96.7 97.0 144.4 96.7 97.5 202.6 95.3 95.8 179.6 95.7 96.3 152.5 96.8 97.3 224.4 94.6 95.3 187.1 96.0 97.0 139.1 97.4 97.7 199.9 95.3 95.8 173.6 96.2 96.4 149.7 96.7 97.3 219.7 94.6 95.2 179.7 96.1 96.9 135.1 97.0 97.7 195.5 95.7 96.0 152.1 96.8 97.1 141.6 96.9 97.3 216.1 95.4 95.6 173.9 96.2 97.0 130.2 97.3 97.7 182.7 95.9 96.3 147.3 96.7 97.1 138.7 97.7 97.7 207.3 95.9 96.2 166.6 96.6 97.0 125.4 97.6 97.8 168.2 96.5 96.8 144.2 96.9 97.1 135.0 97.6 97.8 204.7 95.7 96.2 148.8 97.0 97.4 111.6 98.0 98.3 153.0 96.8 97.0 135.3 97.5 97.8 133.2 97.2 97.8 200.5 95.7 96.2 146.0 97.0 97.4 107.4 97.9 98.3 151.3 96.4 97.0 132.9 97.0 97.8 126.4 97.3 97.8 198.6 96.4 96.7 143.1 96.8 97.4 101.4 98.6 98.7 99 a OF 9 00 141.0 01 04 xg 1 990 993 Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 5 (2018) Profile - UT 1 Reach 3, Station 00+00 to 03+50 104 102 100 m a m 98 v v c 0 96 v w 94 92 90 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Distance (feet) -Year 0(2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2(2015) Bed -Year 3(2016) Bed -Year 4(2017) Bed -TOB Year 5(2018) Bed -Year 5(2018) Water Surface 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0305 0.0304 0.0305 0.0315 0.0281 0.0297 Riffle Length 17 21 21 13 22 22 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0388 0.0395 0.0310 0.0459 0.0404 0.0412 Pool Length 13 13 14 16 14 14 Pool to Pool Spacing 31 34 44 27 31 34 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Distance (feet) -Year 0(2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2(2015) Bed -Year 3(2016) Bed -Year 4(2017) Bed -TOB Year 5(2018) Bed -Year 5(2018) Water Surface A Name Martins Creek I1 Water ElevatioE 1672.7 UT 1 Reach 4, Station 05+50 - 17+00 A Number 92633 96.0 96.1 4/3/18 94.7 96.2 Perkinson, Butler 94.1 96.2 2014 95.0 Year 0 Monitoring \Survey 96.2 Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 1651.4 95.9 96.3 1644.5 95.0 96.3 1638.0 94.2 96.4 1634.4 96.3 96.4 1630.0 96.0 96.4 1624.0 94.5 96.4 1614.7 94.6 96.4 1611.1 96.7 96.8 1591.5 96.7 97.0 1571.8 97.0 97.2 1567.2 95.9 97.3 1563.9 95.7 97.3 1555.3 95.9 97.3 1551.1 97.0 97.2 1515.5 97.3 97.8 1512.7 96.4 97.8 1505.9 95.4 97.8 1500.0 96.8 97.7 1497.4 96.3 97.7 1495.0 96.3 97.8 1491.6 97.1 97.7 1450.2 98.1 98.3 1446.5 97.1 98.4 1440.5 96.4 98.3 1435.8 96.2 98.4 1429.6 97.9 98.3 1336.8 98.3 98.8 112 110 108 2 106 m m 104 w w c 102 0 w 100 w 98 96 94 92 550 750 950 1150 1350 1550 2014 Year 1 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 1672.7 94.9 95.6 1652.2 96.0 96.1 1643.3 94.7 96.2 1638.9 94.1 96.2 1636.1 95.0 96.2 1634.1 96.2 96.3 1623.8 94.8 96.3 1617.9 94.3 96.3 1611.2 94.8 96.3 1609.1 96.4 96.6 1570.4 96.9 97.1 1564.9 95.9 97.1 1557.1 95.9 97.1 1551.1 97.0 97.2 1515.2 97.5 97.6 1511.4 96.2 97.6 1502.7 95.6 97.6 1498.0 96.7 97.6 1493.6 96.1 97.6 1488.2 97.3 97.6 1448.8 98.0 98.2 1444.2 96.8 98.3 1435.5 96.2 98.2 1432.4 96.8 98.3 1424.8 98.0 98.2 1402.7 98.5 98.6 1398.5 97.8 98.7 2015 Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 1683.1 95.5 95.8 1664.7 95.8 96.3 1646.4 94.8 96.3 1640.1 94.7 96.3 1632.3 96.2 96.4 1630.1 95.9 96.5 1625.2 94.5 96.5 1618.0 94.8 96.5 1609.3 96.6 96.8 1606.4 96.8 97.4 1567.1 95.7 97.4 1561.2 95.8 97.3 1551.2 96.9 97.4 1547.3 97.4 97.9 1511.8 95.9 97.8 1506.9 95.8 97.9 1497.8 97.1 97.8 1487.5 98.0 98.4 1446.9 96.3 98.4 1436.9 96.4 98.4 1431.6 97.8 98.4 1427.8 98.5 98.9 1391.2 97.1 99.0 1385.5 96.3 99.0 1380.2 98.2 99.0 1371.8 98.4 99.1 1353.1 97.8 99.1 Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 5 (2018) Profile - UT 1 Reach 4, Station 05+50 to 17+00 2016 2014 2015 2017 2017 2017 2018 0.0135 0.0123 Year 3 Monitoring \Survey 0.0120 Year 4 Monitoring \Survey Year 5 Monitoring \Survey Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE Station Bed Elevation Water ElevatioE 1668.1 95.4 95.9 1633.0 96.3 96.5 1656.0 96.1 96.3 1649.8 96.0 96.3 1628.1 96.2 96.7 1642.2 96.1 96.7 1641.6 94.7 96.3 1624.0 95.2 96.7 1636.9 94.9 96.2 1635.1 94.7 96.3 1616.9 94.8 96.7 1627.6 94.9 96.2 1632.6 96.3 96.4 1613.4 94.8 96.7 1626.0 96.2 96.4 1628.4 96.2 96.6 1608.2 96.5 96.8 1620.9 95.8 96.5 1622.3 95.2 96.6 1582.1 97.0 97.4 1616.8 94.8 96.5 1609.8 94.7 96.6 1565.6 95.8 97.5 1604.3 94.8 96.5 1607.1 96.7 96.8 1556.7 95.7 97.3 1601.0 96.5 96.7 1570.1 97.0 97.5 1548.9 97.1 97.5 1565.6 96.7 97.2 1564.8 95.7 97.5 1528.2 97.2 97.7 1556.4 95.4 97.2 1548.2 97.0 97.5 1514.8 97.3 97.9 1548.4 95.6 97.2 1513.5 97.3 97.9 1509.3 96.3 98.0 1542.1 96.9 97.2 1509.0 96.2 97.9 1503.5 95.9 98.0 1509.1 97.3 97.8 1502.5 95.7 97.9 1497.3 96.8 97.9 1501.8 96.1 97.8 1496.9 96.6 97.9 1493.9 96.3 98.0 1488.3 96.2 97.8 1494.1 96.1 97.9 1490.8 96.8 97.9 1482.4 97.2 97.8 1489.0 97.2 97.9 1487.2 97.3 98.0 1442.7 98.0 98.5 1449.1 98.0 98.5 1469.2 97.7 98.1 1437.1 96.9 98.5 1441.3 96.2 98.5 1448.8 98.1 98.5 1427.2 96.2 98.5 1433.7 96.1 98.5 1444.0 97.1 98.6 1419.5 97.9 98.5 1427.6 97.6 98.5 1437.4 96.4 98.6 1394.2 98.2 98.9 1401.2 98.3 98.9 1432.5 96.6 98.5 1390.1 96.9 98.8 1395.4 96.9 98.9 1429.3 97.7 98.6 1381.3 97.3 98.8 1391.0 96.4 98.9 1399.8 98.3 99.0 1377.2 98.0 98.9 1388.3 97.9 98.8 1394.2 96.7 99.0 1361.3 98.5 98.9 1386.4 97.2 98.9 1389.9 97.1 99.0 1355.0 97.9 98.9 Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633 Year 5 (2018) Profile - UT 1 Reach 4, Station 05+50 to 17+00 Distance (feet) -Year 0(2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2(2015) Bed -Year 3(2016) Bed -Year 4(2017) Bed -TOB ♦Year 5(2018) Bed -Year 5(2018) Water Surface 2014 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 Avg. Water Surface Slope 0.0135 0.0123 0.0116 0.0120 0.0117 0.0118 Riffle Length 21 23 6 22 19 21 Avg. Riffle Slope 0.0166 0.0161 0.1220 0.0197 0.0209 0.0160 Pool Length 22 19 40 18 22 20 Pool to Pool Spacing 42 40 46 37 39 40 Distance (feet) -Year 0(2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -Year 2(2015) Bed -Year 3(2016) Bed -Year 4(2017) Bed -TOB ♦Year 5(2018) Bed -Year 5(2018) Water Surface Summary Data Feature: Riffle 0.707 D35 9.2 D50 23.1 D84 64 2018 87 Description Material Size (mm) Total # Item % Cum % Silt/Clay silt/clay 0.062 2 8% 8% Sand very fine sand 0.125 1 4% 12% fine sand 0.250 0 0% 12% medium sand 0.50 0 0% 12% coarse sand 1.00 2 8% 20% very coarse sand 2.0 0 0% 20% Gravel very fine gravel 4.0 0 0% 20% fine gravel 5.7 2 8% 28% fine gravel 8.0 0 0% 28% medium gravel 11.3 4 16% 44% medium gravel 16.0 1 4% 48% course gravel 22.3 0 0% 48% course gravel 32.0 4 16% 64% very coarse gravel 45 4 16% 80% very coarse gravel 64 1 4% 84% Cobble small cobble 90 3 12% 96% medium cobble 128 1 4% 100% large cobble 180 0 0% 100% very large cobble 256 0 0% 100% Boulder small boulder 362 0 0% 100% small boulder 512 0 0% 100% medium boulder 1024 0 0% 100% large boulder 2048 0 0% 100% Bedrock bedrock 40096 0 0% 100% TOTAL % of whole count 25 100% 100% Summary Data D16 0.707 D35 9.2 D50 23.1 D84 64 D95 87 Individual Class Percent 100% 90% 80% d 70% a 60% 50% U 40% v 30% S 20% ro s 10% 0% oob`Lo��S oti5 05 '1 ti a �'� g "� tib ryry n: a5 ba qo s ' e b`Y Particle Size (mm) ■■111111■■111111■■111111■■4'/ilk■■111111 �■■111111■■YIIII�■■111111■I%�:111�■■111111 ' �■■111111■■■1111■■IIIIII�I�i111111�■■111111 �■■111111■■■1111■■111111/:IIIIIII�■■111111 .,,, �■■111111■■■1111■■111111 �i/I■111111■■111111 ,, , �■■111111■■■1111■��!:%i�%ir■111111■■111111 ,, , ,, , �■■111111■■■1111��!!=;�rl�■■111111■■111111 �■■111111_■_■Il�;��/.i�ill�■■111111■■111111 ,, , ,,■■11==��- -_---::0:S�■�111111�■■111111■■111111 �■■111111��■■11111■■111111■■111111■■111111 ,,, Individual Class Percent 100% 90% 80% d 70% a 60% 50% U 40% v 30% S 20% ro s 10% 0% oob`Lo��S oti5 05 '1 ti a �'� g "� tib ryry n: a5 ba qo s ' e b`Y Particle Size (mm) Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT -1 to Martin's Creek) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Gauge TRegional Curve Pre -Existing Condition (UT -1) Reference Reach(es) Data Design (UT -1) Monitoring Baseline (UT -1 Reach 4) Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Max Med Min Mean Med Max SD BF Width (ft) 5.9 8.5 7.6 14.0 3.0 11.7 21.7 7.7 8.5 6.4 7.1 6.6 8.4 1.1 Floodprone Width ft 9.0 17.0 16.2 30.8 8.2 20 410 16 100 25 25 25 25 0 BF Mean Depth 11 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.6 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.2 BF Max Depth (ft2 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.2 0.9 2.5 0.7 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.2 0.2 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft 2) 3.6 4.7 4.3 6.2 1.2 10.2 13.1 4.1 6.0 3.2 4.5 3.8 6.4 1.7 Width/Depth Ratio 7.6 18.8 12.6 55.0 18.0 10.7 17.0 12.0 14.3 10.5 11.4 11.0 12.8 1.2 Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 2.0 2.0 2.9 0.6 1.7 32.0 2.0 11.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 0.1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 2.0 1.8 4.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Proflle Riffle length ft 5 21 20 40 8 Riffle slope ft/ft 0.025 0.170 0.2000 1.9000 0.0100 0.1600 0.0009 0.0166 0.0148 0.0337 0.0111 Pool length ft 8.0 22.0 22.0 37.0 9.5 Pool Max depth 11 2.2 2.5 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.4 0.2 Pool spacing (ft) 30.0 85.0 48.0 231.0 12.0 45.0 27.0 42.0 40.0 61.0 11.0 Pattern Channel Beltwidth ft 16 55 40 40 Radius of Curvature ft 28 47 30 40 30 40 Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 2 3 3.8 4.7 3.8 4.7 Meander Wavelength ft 70 260 15 30 15 30 Meander Width ratio 1.1 4.1 4.7 4.7 Transport parameters Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs/ft 2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull Stream Power (transport ca aci W/m2 Additional Reach Parameters Ros en Classification Eb/Fb/B/G/Cb Aa/Bc B/C B/C Bankf ill Velocity s 4.2-4.4 3.9-4.3 Bankfull Discharge cfs 16-25 Valley Length ft 1565 ---- Channel Thalweg Length ft 1747 ---- ---- 781 Sinuosity 1.06 - 1.18 1.19 1.05-1.4 1.05-1.4 Water Surface Slope ft/ft 0.015-0.05 0.0333 .01-.057 0.0135 BF slope ft/11 ---- ---- ---- ---- Bankf ill Floodplain Area acres ---- ---- ---- ---- % of Reach with Eroding Banks ---- ---- Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ---- ---- Biolo ical or Other ---- ---- Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach es Data Design Monitoring Baseline Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE% dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95 .6-.8 2-4.4 3.6-8.7 15.9-28 66.8 - Entrainment Class <1.5/1.5 -1.99/2.0 -4.9/5.0 - Incision Class <1.2/1.2-1.49/1.5-1.99/>2.0 Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT -1 to Martin's Creek) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Gauge TRegional Curve Pre -Existing Condition (UT -1) Reference Reach(es) Data Design (UT -1) Monitoring Baseline (UT -1 Reach 2) Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Max Med Min Mean Med Max SD BF Width (ft) 5.9 8.5 7.6 14.0 3.0 11.7 21.7 7.7 8.5 8.0 8.7 Floodprone Width ft 9.0 17.0 16.2 30.8 8.2 20 410 16 100 25 BF Mean Depth ft 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.6 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.7 BF Max Depth (ft2 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.2 0.9 2.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft 2) 3.6 4.7 4.3 6.2 1.2 10.2 13.1 4.1 6.0 5.2 5.9 Width/Depth Ratio 7.6 18.8 12.6 55.0 18.0 10.7 17.0 12.0 14.3 12.3 12.8 Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 2.0 2.0 2.9 0.6 1.7 32.0 2.0 11.8 2.9 3.1 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 2.0 1.8 4.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Profile Riffle length ft 5 21 20 40 8 Riffle slope ft/ft 0.025 0.170 0.2000 1.9000 0.0100 0.1600 0.0009 0.0166 0.0148 0.0337 0.0111 Pool length ft 8.0 22.0 22.0 37.0 9.5 Pool Max depth ft 2.2 2.5 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.4 0.2 Pool spacing (ft) 30.0 85.0 48.0 231.0 12.0 45.0 27.0 42.0 40.0 61.0 11.0 Pattern Channel Beltwidth ft 16 55 40 40 Radius of Curvature ft 28 47 30 40 30 40 Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 2 3 3.8 4.7 3.8 4.7 Meander Wavelength ft 70 260 15 30 15 30 Meander Width ratio 1.1 4.1 4.7 4.7 Transport parameters Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs/ft 2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull Stream Power (transport ca aci W/m2 Additional Reach Parameters Ros en Classification Eb/Fb/B/G/Cb Aa/Bc B/C C Bankf ill Velocity s 4.2-4.4 3.9-4.3 Bankfull Discharge cfs 16-25 Valley Length ft 1565 ---- Channel Thalweg Length ft 1747 ---- ---- 1176 Sinuosity 1.06 - 1.18 1.19 1.05-1.4 1.05-1.4 Water Surface Slope ft/ft 0.015-0.05 0.0333 .01-.057 0.0577 BF slope ft/ft ---- ---- ---- ---- Bankf ill Floodplain Area acres ---- ---- ---- ---- % of Reach with Eroding Banks ---- ---- Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ---- ---- Biolo ical or Other ---- Table 10d. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach es Data Design Monitoring Baseline Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE% dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95 .6-.8 2-4.4 3.6-8.7 15.9-28 66.8 - Entrainment Class <1.5/1.5 -1.99/2.0 -4.9/5.0 - Incision Class <1.2/1.2-1.49/1.5-1.99/>2.0 Table 10e. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT 1-3 to Martin's Creek) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Gauge TRegional Curve Pre -Existing Condition SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE% Reference Reach(es) Data d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 0.3 1.1 3.5 12.1 15.7 Design Entrainment Class <1.5/1.5 -1.99/2.0 -4.9/5.0 - Monitoring Baseline (UT 1-3) Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Max Med Min Mean Med Max SD BF Width (ft) 5.0 7.5 6.9 11.4 2.7 11.7 21.7 6.0 6.5 5.1 8.0 6.8 11.4 2.5 Floodprone Width ft 10.3 15.4 12.6 26.2 7.3 20 410 11 100 14 77 100 100 39 BF Mean Depth ft 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.6 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.2 BF Max Depth ft 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.1 0.9 2.5 1 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.9 1.2 0.3 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft 2) 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.3 0.2 10.2 13.1 2.9 3.2 1.7 5.1 3.0 9.9 3.5 Width/Depth Ratio 8.6 19.9 15.6 39.7 13.6 10.7 17.0 12.5 11.9 15.5 14.3 22.7 3.8 Entrenchment Ratio 1.5 2.1 2.0 2.7 0.6 1.7 32.0 3.8 15.4 2.7 9.4 9.4 15.4 5.0 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.7 1.4 3.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Profile Riffle length ft 7 19 18 51 10 Riffle slope ft/ft 0.013 0.100 0.2000 1.9000 0.0100 0.1800 0.0215 0.0457 0.0445 0.0667 0.0125 Pool length ft 3.0 6.0 6.0 10.0 2.0 Pool Max depth ft 2.2 2.5 1.6 Pool spacing (ft) 20.0 100.0 48.0 231.0 10.0 60.0 15.0 25.0 23.0 58.0 10.0 Pattern Channel Beltwidth Jft 22 46 16 55 26 50 40 Radius of Curvature ft 14 28 28 47 15 40 30 40 Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 1.2 5.6 2 3 2.5 6.7 3.8 4.7 Meander Wavelength ft 56 81 70 260 65 110 15 30 Meander Width ratio 1.9 9.2 1.1 4.1 4.3 8.3 4.7 Transport parameters Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs/ft 2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull Stream Power trans ort ca aci W/m2 Additional Reach Parameters Ros en Classification Eb/B/C/F AaBc B/C E Bankfull Velocity s 6 -Feb 3.8-4.9 Bankfull Discharge cfs 11.0 - 14.0 Valley Length ft 1320 ---- Channel Thalweg Length ft 1584 ---- ---- 2092 Sinuosity 1.2 1.19 1.26-1.42 1.2 Water Surface Slope ft/ft 0.007-0.04 0.0333 0.005-0.054 0.0161 BF slope ft/11 ---- ---- ---- ---- Bankf ill Floodplain Area acres ---- ---- ---- ---- % of Reach with Eroding Banks ---- ---- Channel Stability or Habitat Metric I I ---- ---- Biolo ical or Other ---- I ---- Table 10L Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions) Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach es Data Design Monitoring Baseline Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE% d16/d35/d50/d84/d95 0.3 1.1 3.5 12.1 15.7 Entrainment Class <1.5/1.5 -1.99/2.0 -4.9/5.0 - Incision Class <1.2/1.2-1.49/1.5-1.99/>2.0 Table lla. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections) Martin's Creek II Mitieadon Proiect - DMS Protect Number 92633 Table 116. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project- DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Baseline UT 1-3 Cross Section 1 UT 1 Reach 4 MY -1 UT 1-3 Cross Section 2 T 1 Reach 4 MY -3 UT 1-3 Cross Section 3 T 1-3 MY -5 UT 1-3 Cross Section 4 UT 1-3 Cross Section 5 1-3 Cross Section 6 1-3 Parameter Riffle Riffle Riffle Dimension and Substrate -Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max Pool Min Mean Med Max SD Riffle Mean Med Max SD Min Pool Med Max Dimension MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ BF Width ft 11.4 11.2 11.9 11.4 11.2 11.6 11.4 11.8 11.3 11.1 11.4 11.8 6.8 6.8 6.5 6.4 6.9 7.0 7.7 7.7 7.8 7.4 8.4 7.7 8.3 9.3 7.6 7.4 7.2 6.7 9.2 8.3 9.0 7.0 9.3 6.9 Floodprone Width (ft) (approx) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA BF Mean Depth ft 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.3 0.8 1.1 BF Max Depth ft 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.2 0.9 0.9 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.2 1.5 1.9 BF Cross Sectional Area (f?) 9.6 9.4 8.2 8.4 8.1 8.1 9.9 10.2 8.2 8.6 8.7 8.7 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.9 7.3 7.3 6.4 6.5 5.9 5.9 6.2 6.3 4.3 4.7 4.0 4.0 12.0 11.1 9.1 9.3 7.9 7.9 Width/Depth Ratio 13.5 13.3 17.3 15.5 15.5 16.6 13.1 13.7 15.6 14.3 14.9 16.0 16.5 16.5 16.9 14.6 16.4 16.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA 11.1 13.7 13.4 11.7 13.0 11.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA Entrenchment Ratio 8.8 8.9 8.4 8.8 8.9 8.6 8.8 8.5 8.8 9.0 8.8 8.5 14.7 14.7 15.4 15.6 14.5 14.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA 12.0 10.8 13.2 13.5 13.9 14.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.33 1.50 1.60 1.50 1.16 1 1.17 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0163 0.0154 0.0418 0.0123 0.0000 0.0197 ---- 15.0 16.9 9.4 9.4 12.1 23.1 ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ 16 1 12 49 1 10 Cross Section 7 UT 1-3 35 9 3 Cross Section 8 UT 1-3 35 9 Pool Max depth (ft)l Cross Section 9 UT 1-3 1 2.0 1 2.7 1 0.6 Cross Section 10 UT 1-3 1 1.9 2.6 1 0.4 Cross Section 11 UT 1-3 1 1.9 1 2.3 0.3 Cross Section 12 UT 1-3 1 2.0 Parameter 0.3 1 1.2 1 1.5 Pool 1.7 0.2 0.9 1.5 1.6 Riffle 0.4 Pool spacing(ft) 7 1 34 1 31 Pool 1 15 1 7 34 1 33 75 1 Pool 1 7 1 35 1 35 1 71 15 Riffle 33 1 30 1 67 1 16 1 7 Riffle 33 72 16 6 32 30 61 15 Pattern Dimension MYO MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2FNA MY4 MY5 MY5+ MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ BF Width ft 6.5 8.1 9.5 7.6 8.5 6.0 6.5 6.7 5.7 4.5 5.3 6.7 10.6 10.6 8.5 9.5 7.2 6.2 6.5 6.5 6.8 6.8 6.0 5.7 5.9 6.4 7.4 5.1 5.4 5.6 6.1 6.2 5.7 Flood rone Width (ft) a rox NA NA NA NA NA NA 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 BF Mean Depth ft 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 BF Max Depth (ft) 2.7 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.4 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.6 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 2.0 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 BF Cross Sectional Area (fte) 7.1 6.8 6.1 6.8 5.5 5.5 3.0 2.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 9.3 8.0 7.2 5.4 5.4 (stype INANA 5.1 4.7 3.5 3.5 2.3 2.5 2.0 2.6 2.5 2.5 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 Width/Depth Ratio NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.1 16.0 18.1 11.3 16.5 26.4 NA NA NA NA NA Sinuosity NA NA NA NA 20.1 14.4 16.2 13.4 16.4 21.9 15.3 17.2 15.7 18.6 20.2 17.1 chment Ratio NA NA NA NA NA NA 15.4 14.9 17.5 22.2 18.9 14.9 NA NA NA 0.0161 NA NA NA NA NA NA 37 4.2 4.4 4.2 3.9 3.4 0.017 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.5 Bank Hei ht Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ----- 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.20 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 d50 mm ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B % BE % Table 116. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project- DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Baseline UT 1-3 MY -1 UT 1-3 MY -2 UT 1-3 MY -3 UT 1-3 MY -4 UT 1-3 MY -5 UT 1-3 Dimension and Substrate -Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SU BF Width (ft) 5.1 8.0 6.8 11.4 2.5 5.4 8.2 6.8 11.8 2.6 5.6 7.8 6.5 11.9 2.7 4.5 7.5 6.4 11.4 2.7 5.3 7.8 6.9 11.4 2.5 5.7 8.1 7.0 11.8 2.5 Floodprone Width ft 14 77 100 100 39 14 77 100 100 39 14 77 100 100 39 14 77 100 100 39 14 77 100 100 39 14 77 100 100 39 BF Mean Depth (ft) 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.9 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.2 BF Max Depth ft 0.5 0.9 0.9 1.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.7 1.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.2 0.6 0.9 0.9 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.7 1.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.6 1.1 0.2 BF Cross Sectional Area (f?) 1.7 5.1 3.0 9.9 3.5 1.7 5.1 2.8 10.2 3.5 1.8 4.1 2.5 8.2 2.9 1.8 4.4 2.8 8.6 2.9 1.7 4.3 2.9 8.7 2.9 1.7 4.3 2.9 8.7 2.9 Width/Depth Ratio 11.9 15.5 14.3 22.7 3.8 13.1 15.3 15.0 18.0 2.0 12.7 15.6 16.1 19.0 2.1 11.3 15.0 14.8 20.3 3.0 13.0 16.1 16.4 20.2 2.2 11.2 18.0 16.9 26.4 4.8 Entrenchment Ratio 2.7 9.4 9.4 15.4 5.0 2.6 9.2 9.2 14.9 4.7 2.5 10.0 10.0 17.5 5.6 2.3 10.8 10.8 22.2 6.9 2.3 10.2 10.2 18.9 6.0 2.5 9.6 9.6 14.9 5.3 Bank Height Rati 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.2 0.1 Profile Riffle length (ftA 4 1 20 1 19 1 41 1 8.9 1 4 1 20 1 20 1 44 1 9 4.1 1 22.2 1 22.7 63.5 1 11.5 2 1 19 1 19 38 1 7 1 4 21 1 21 43 1 8 1 3.5 18.5 18.1 33.3 7 Riffle slope ft/ft 0.0000 1 0.0185 0.0166 0.0550 0.0145 0.0000 0.0209 0.0183 0.0578 0.0153 0.0000 0.0163 0.0154 0.0418 0.0123 0.0000 0.0197 0.0197 0.0715 0.01 0.0000 0.0118 0.0142 0.0495 0.0132 0.0000 0.0187 0.0178 0.0755 0.0154 Pool length ft 3 1 14 12 1 33 9 1 3 16 12 37 1 10 3 1 13 10 1 30 8 3 16 1 12 49 1 10 3 12 15 35 9 3 14 11 35 9 Pool Max depth (ft)l 1.2 1 2.1 1 2.0 1 2.7 1 0.6 1 1.4 2.0 1 1.9 2.6 1 0.4 1 1.6 1 1.9 1 1.9 1 2.3 0.3 1 1.6 1.9 1 2.0 1 2.2 1 0.3 1 1.2 1 1.5 1.5 1.7 0.2 0.9 1.5 1.6 1.9 0.4 Pool spacing(ft) 7 1 34 1 31 1 63 1 15 1 7 34 1 33 75 1 16 1 7 1 35 1 35 1 71 15 1 9 33 1 30 1 67 1 16 1 7 1 33 33 72 16 6 32 30 61 15 Pattern Channel Beltwidth ft 26 50 Radius of Curvature ft 15 40 Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 2.5 6.7 Meander W-clen h (ft) 65 110 Meander Width ratio 4.3 8.3 Additional Reach Parameters Ros en Classification E -type E -type (stype E -type (stype E -type Channel Thalweg Length ft 2092 2099 1833 1847 1851 1848 Sinuosity 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.0161 0.0162 0.0174 0.017 0.0166 0.0159 BF slope ft/ft ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B % BE % dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95 % of Reach with Erodin Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Me. Biological or Other] Table llc. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections) Martin's Creek D Mitigation Prniect - DMS Prniect Number 92633 Table lld. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Martin's Creek II Mitigation Prqject - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Baseline (UT 1 Reach 4) Cross Section 13 UT 1 Reach 4 MY -1 (UT 1 Reach 4) Cross Section 14 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 4) Cross Section 15 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY4 (UT 1 Reach 4) Cross Section 16 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 4) Cross Section 17 (UT 1 Reach 4 Parameter Riffle Riffle Pool Riffle Pool Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD BF Width (ft) 6.4 Dimension MYO MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MY] MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MYS+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MYS+ BF Width (ft) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.3 6.2 4.5 6.4 6.3 6.1 5.7 6.5 6.4 13.4 13.6 12.4 7.0 13.2 13.9 8.4 8.6 7.4 6.8 7.2 6.9 9.7 9.9 7.8 8.1 9.4 10.2 Floodprone Width (ft) (approx) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA BF Mean Depth ft 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.0 0.9 BF Max Depth ft 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 2.1 2.1 1.4 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 2.4 2.7 2.7 3.1 2.0 1.7 BF Cross Sectional Area (fe) 3.8 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.2 2.2 3.2 2.9 2.7 3.0 3.2 3.2 10.9 10.2 6.2 5.6 4.9 4.9 6.4 6.1 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.7 13.2 13.9 10.6 12.1 9.5 9.5 Width/Depth Ratio 11.5 13.2 14.5 14.2 17.5 9.2 12.8 13.7 13.8 10.8 13.2 12.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA 11.0 12.1 11.2 9.6 11.0 10.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA Entrenchment Ratio 3.8 3.8 3.8 4.0 4.0 1 5.6 3.9 4.0 4.1 1 4.4 3.8 1 3.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.0 2.9 1 3.4 3.7 3.5 3.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA Bank Height Ratio 1.33 1.44 1.33 1.55 1.71 1.44 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.14 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 d50 (mm) ---- ---- --- ---- 23 22 43 9 0.4 5.8 4.1 20.9 4.9 3 22 22 40 11 4 19 16 57 13 3.3 20.6 19 54.6 12.1 Riffle slope ft/ft) 0.0009 Table lld. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Martin's Creek II Mitigation Prqject - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Baseline (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -1 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -3 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY4 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 4) Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD BF Width (ft) 6.4 7.1 6.6 8.4 1.1 6.3 7.2 6.6 8.6 1.3 6.1 6.7 6.6 7.4 0.7 5.7 6.3 6.3 6.8 0.6 6.2 6.6 6.5 7.2 0.5 4.5 5.9 6.4 6.9 1.3 Floodprone Width ft) 25 25 25 25 0 25 25 25 25 0 25 25 25 25 0 25 25 25 25 0 25 25 25 25 0 25 25 25 25 0 BF Mean Depth ft 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.1 BF Max Depth ft 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.2 0.2 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.2 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.2 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft) 3.2 4.5 3.8 6.4 1.7 2.9 4.1 3.3 6.1 1.7 2.7 3.5 3.0 4.9 1.2 2.8 3.5 3.0 4.8 1.1 2.2 3.4 3.2 4.7 1.3 2.2 3.4 3.2 4.7 1.3 Width De th Ratio 10.5 11.4 11.0 12.8 1.2 12.3 12.7 12.6 13.2 0.5 10.6 13.0 13.2 15.3 2.3 9.7 12.3 11.4 15.8 3.1 11.0 13.9 13.2 17.5 3.3 9.2 10.7 10.1 12.8 1.9 Entrenchment Rati 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 0.1 2.9 3.6 3.6 4.0 0.6 3.4 3.8 3.8 4.1 0.4 3.7 4.0 4.0 4.4 0.4 3.5 3.8 3.8 4.0 0.3 3.6 4.4 4.4 5.6 1.0 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 0.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 0.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 0.0 1 1.0 1 1.2 1 1.10 1 1.44 1 0.2 Profile - Upstream Riffle length (ft) 5 21 20 40 8 3 23 22 43 9 0.4 5.8 4.1 20.9 4.9 3 22 22 40 11 4 19 16 57 13 3.3 20.6 19 54.6 12.1 Riffle slope ft/ft) 0.0009 0.0166 0.0148 0.0337 0.0111 0.0000 0.0161 0.0192 0.0426 0.0131 0.0031 0.1220 0.0556 1.0788 0.2138 0.0001 0.0197 0.0151 0.0516 0.01 0.0000 0.0209 0.0180 0.0463 0.0145 0.0000 0.0160 0.0142 0.0482 0.0142 Pool length (ft 8 22 22 37 10 6 19 18 34 8 21 40 39 57 11 5 18 18 32 8 8 22 20 51 10 5 20 20 38 8 Pool Max depth (ft) 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.4 0.2 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.7 0.4 1.4 2.1 2.1 2.7 0.9 1.5 2.3 2.3 3.1 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.6 2.0 0.6 1.2 1.5 1 1.5 1.7 0.4 Pool spacing (ft) 27 42 40 61 11 15 40 42 57 12 23 46 49 66 11 5 37 39 61 16 10 39 41 67 17 7 40 1 38 66 16 Pattern Channel Beltwidth (ftA 40 Radius of Curvature (ft) 30 40 Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft 3.8 4.7 Meander Wavelength (ft 15 30 Meander Width ratio 4.7 Additional Reach Parameters Ros en Classificatio B/C - Type Cb -Type Cb -Type Cb -Type Cb -Type Cb -Type Channel Thalweg Length (ft 781 786 1107 1113 1072 1098 Sinuosity 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.0135 0.0123 0.0116 0.012 0.0117 0.0118 BF slope ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE% dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95 % of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other Table Ile. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections) Martin's Creek I1 MitiQation Proiect - DMS Proiect Number 92633 Parameter Baseline (UT 1 Reach 2) Cross Section 18 UT 1 Reach 2 Riffle MY -1 (UT 1 Reach 2) Cross Section 19 UT 1 Reach 2 Riffle MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -3 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -4 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 2) Dimension MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ BF Width ft 8.0 7.9 8.2 7.8 8.0 8.2 8.7 8.0 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.9 Floodprone Width (ft) (approx) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 BF Mean Depth ft 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 BF Max Depth ft 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft), 5.2 5.5 4.7 4.4 4.5 4.5 5.9 5.0 5.8 7.3 7.3 7.3 Width/Depth Ratio 12.3 11.3 14.3 13.8 14.2 14.9 12.8 12.8 12.8 9.4 9.4 10.9 Entrenchment Ratio 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.8 Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 d50 mm --- ---- --- ---- --- --- 0.6 Table HE Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary Martin's Creek I1 Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633 Parameter Baseline (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -1 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -3 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -4 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 2) Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD BF Width ft 8.0 8.7 7.9 8 8.2 8.6 7.8 8.3 7.5 8 8.2 8.9 Floodprone Width(ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 BF Mean Depth ft 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.6 BF Max Depth Lft 1.1 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.6 0.9 1.4 0.9 1.6 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft) 5.2 5.9 5.0 5.5 4.7 5.8 4.4 7.3 4.5 6.2 4.5 7.3 Width/Depth Ratio 12.3 12.8 11.4 12.5 12.7 14.3 9.4 13.7 9.2 14.0 10.7 15.0 Entrenchment Ratio 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.2 2.9 3.1 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.3 2.8 3.1 Bank Height Ratiol 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.1 1 1 1.0 1 1.1 1 1 1.0 1 1.1 Profile Riffle length ft 7 19 18 51 10 4 16 12 37 9 4.3 16.5 12.8 46.7 9.4 4 13 11 37 8 3 10 13 35 8 3 14.5 11.8 34.9 7.8 Riffle slope ft/ft 0.0215 0.0457 0.0445 0.0667 0.0125 NA* NA* NA* NA* NA* NA* NA* NA* NA* NA* 0.0000 0.0386 0.0396 0.1171 0.03 0.0000 0.0382 0.0406 0.1209 0.0257 0.0000 0.0737 0.0383 0.1077 0.0222 Pool length ft 3 6 6 10 2 3 6 5 12 2 3 6 6 14 2 2 8 7 17 3 3 8 7 16 3 3 8 7 25 4 Pool Max depth ft Pool spacing (ft) 15 25 23 58 10 9 22 19 45 9 9 24 19 55 11 9 21 17 46 9 6 17 19 41 8 6 21 19 41 8 Pattern Channel Beltwidth fr 40 Radius of Curvature(ft) 40 Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 4.7 Meander Wavelength ft 30 Meander Width ratio 4.7 Additional Reach Parameters Ros en Classification C - Type C - Type C - Type C - Type C - Type C - Type Channel Thalweg Length ft 1176 1167 1176 1169 1169 1167 Sinuosity 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 2.2 Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) 0.0577 NA* 0.0582 0.0578 0.0576 0.0579 BF slope ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- Ini�c�ft/ft Ri%/RU%P%G%/S% SC%/SA%/G%/C°/aB%BE% dl6/d35/d5O/d84/d95 % of Reach with Eroding Banks Channel Stability or Habitat Metric Biological or Other NA* No water in channel during field surveys. APPENDIX E HYDROLOGY DATA Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary Figure E1. Martin's Creek 11 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall Groundwater Gauge Graphs Sample Time -Lapse Photos from MC UT1R2 Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site (DMS Prosect Number 92633) Date of Data Date of Method Photo (if Collection Occurrence available) August 25, 2014 April 7, 2014 Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately --- 2.4 inches of rain documented in one day at an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately August 25, 2014 July 1, 2014 2.02 inches of rain was documented over two days at an onsite --- rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately August 25, 2014 August 24, 2014 1.39 inches of rain documented over two days at an onsite rain --- gauge. September 3, Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately October 27, 2014 2014 1.67 inches of rain documented in one day at an onsite rain --- gauge. Crest gauge data and laid back vegetation indicate a bankfull October 27, 2014 October 14, 2014 event after approximately 2.5 inches of rain documented in one 1 day at an onsite rain gauge. November 17, Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately April 12, 2015 2014 1.44 inches of rain documented in one day at an onsite rain --- gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately July 13, 2015 June 11, 2015 1.68 inches of rain documented in one day at an onsite rain --- gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately July 13, 2015 June 26, 2015 1.57 inches of rain was documented in one day at an onsite rain --- gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately September 11, 2015 August 19, 2015 2.94 inches of rain was documented over three days at an onsite --- rain gauge. September 26, Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately November 18, 2015 2015 2.65 inches of rain was documented over two days at an onsite --- rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately November 18, 2015 October 3, 2015 4.50 inches of rain was documented over three days at an onsite --- rain gauge. Crest gauge data, floodplain scour, and laid back vegetation August 22, 2016 June 5, 2016 indicate a bankfull event after approximately 2.28 inches of rain 2 was documented over two days at an onsite rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately August 29, 2017 June 23, 2017 1.85 inches of rain was documented in one day at an onsite rain -- gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately November 8, 2017 October 8, 2017 1.97 inches of rain was documented in one day at an onsite rain -- gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately September 25, 2018 August 2, 2018 3.47 inches of rain was documented over three days at a nearby --- rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after approximately September 25, 2018 August 11, 2018 2.94 inches of rain was documented over three days at a nearby --- rain gauge. Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after an September 25, 2018 August 31, 2018 approximately 2.86 -inch rain event documented over three days 3-4 at a nearby rain gauge. Martin's Creek I1 Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site (DMS Proiect Number 92633) *This gauge malfunctioned on July 1, 2017 and was replaced on August 30, 2017. The new gauge collected data for just 6 days before malfunctioning again for the remainder of the growing season; however, it was saturated/inundated for 42 days prior to its malfunction. **This gauge malfunctioned on August 29, 2017 resulting in loss of data for the remainder of the growing season. The gauge had not met success criteria prior to its malfunction, and it is not expected to have met success criteria during the period of its malfunction. Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season Gauge (Percentage) Year 1 (2014) Year 2 (2015) Year 3 (2016) Year 4 (2017) Year 5 (2018) 1 Yes/75 Days Yes/118 Days Yes/49 Days Yes/137 Days Yes/191 Days (39%) (61.8%) (25.7%) (71.7%) (100%) 2 No/21 Days Yes/36 Days No/ 12 Days Yes*/42 Days Yes/107 Days (11%) (18.8%) (6.3%) (22.0%) (56.0%) 3 Yes/52 Days Yes/72 Days Yes/45 Days Yes/58 Days Yes/191 Days (27%) (37.7%) (23.6%) (30.4%) (100%) 4 No/21 Days Yes/27 Days No/ 12 Days No/31 Days Yes/74 Days (11%) (14.1%) (6.3%) (16.2%) (38.7%) 5 No/ 15 Days Yes/25 Days No/12 Days No/23 Days Yes/82 Days (7.8%) (13.1%) (6.3%) (12.0%) (42.9%) 6 Yes/58 Days Yes/69 Days Yes/47 Days Yes/58 Days Yes/78 Days (30%) (36.1%) (24.6%) (30.4%) (40.8%) 7 Yes/85 Days Yes/69 Days Yes/27 Days Yes/99 Days Yes/191 Days (44%) (36.1%) (14.1%) (51.8%) (100%) 8 Yes/65Days Yes/72 Days Yes/45 Days Yes/55 Days Yes/191 Days (34%) (37.7%) (23.6%) (28.8%) (100%) 9 No/22 Days Yes/27 Days Yes/27 Days No/24 Days Yes/63 Days (11.5%) (14.1%) (14.1%) (12.6%) (33.0%) 10 No/24 Days Yes/28 Days No/ 12 Days No/31 Days No/29 Days (12.5%) (14.7%) (6.3%) (16.2%) (15.2%) 11 No/ 18 Days No/22 Days No/7 Days No**/16 Days No/32 Days (9%) (11.5%) (3.7%) (8.4%) (16.8%) 12 No/20 Days Yes/27 Days No/ 12 Days Yes/38 Days Yes/191 Days (10%) (14.1%) (6.3%) (20%) (100%) 13 Yes/116 Days Yes/117 Days Yes/66 Days Yes/96 Days Yes/191 Days (61%) (61.2%) (34.6%) (50.3%) (100%) *This gauge malfunctioned on July 1, 2017 and was replaced on August 30, 2017. The new gauge collected data for just 6 days before malfunctioning again for the remainder of the growing season; however, it was saturated/inundated for 42 days prior to its malfunction. **This gauge malfunctioned on August 29, 2017 resulting in loss of data for the remainder of the growing season. The gauge had not met success criteria prior to its malfunction, and it is not expected to have met success criteria during the period of its malfunction. Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices 12 10 a� 8 6 4 2 0 Figure EI: Martin's Creek 11 30-70 Percentile Graph vs. Onsite Rainfall Data from WETS Station: MURPHY, NC 6001 � 2014 X2015 � 2016 � 2017 � 2018 —30th Percentile —70th Percentile 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 c -2 y -4 c(i -6 J v -8 3 -10 M -12 -14 -16 to -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 0 0 0 0 N N N N OD N N N l71 N N N W N N N W V N N N A N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N N \ \ \ N \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ I\+ \ \ \ \ \ Ol W N N N 00 00 N N N 00 N N N 00 N N N N 00 N N N OG N N N N N \ \ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 N 00 00 00 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 1 Year 5 (2018 Data) 3.5 3.0 2.5 2 1.0 0.5 0.0 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 2 Year 5 (2018 Data) 12 3.5 10 April 14 October 21 8 6 Growing Season Growing Season 4 Start End 3.0 2 0 2 2.5 v -4 - 6 c 3 vo X33 _12 107 Days 36 Das 44 Das 2'0 a c -14 -16 1.5 -18 -20 -22 -24 1.0 -26 -28 -30 -32 0.5 -34 -36 -38 -40 — 0.0 0 0 0 0 N N N 00 N N N 00 00 N N N Ol N N N W N N N N 00 N N N W N N N N l0 N V A \ \ V1 N W \ N W F \ \ \ f-` f \ \ \ f \ \ \ F F \ 00N N N 00 N N N 00 00 N00 N 00 N N N 00 00 N N W \ \ \ W O V N N \ \ \ A F N N N \ N 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 \ \ 00 00 00 00 00 \ 00 12 10 8 6 4 2 _ 0 2 v -4 cu -6 y 8 3 -10 -12 p -14 to -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 A A A \ \ \ 00 0~0 000 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 3 Year 5 (2018 Data) 3.5 3.0 2.5 2 O O O O N 00 N N N Ul F+ N N W N F+ N W V N N N A N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ In N l0 \ N W 0) \ O VA N \ A N 00 \ N 00 Vt N l0 N 00 00 W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 N N 00 00 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 c 2 v -4 � -6 v -8 3 -10 -12 'o -14 cD -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 A A A ll1 l!1 In In In O1 D1 O1 01 V V V V V Oo 00 00 W l0 w W l0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O O N N N N 00 N N N Ln N N N W N N N W V N N N A N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N N N 00 00 N N N 00 I--' F-' F-` 00 N 1—` I—` I--` WN N N W N N N N N \ \ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 4 Year 5 (2018 Data) 3.5 3.0 2.5 E 0 0 2.0 c z 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 12 10 April 14 8 Growing Season 6 4 Start 2 _ 0 2 Z -4 > -6 IU 8 3 -10 3 -12 21 Days 22 Days c -14 l`7 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 32 -34 -36 -38 -40 4 \ \ N N \ \ \ N 00 00 N f-+ F+ 00 f-+ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 5 Year 5 (2018 Data) O1 Ol V V V V V 00 00 0o 00 t0 N A F+ N 00 Fo co 00 co 00 00 Fo co 00 00 W 00 00 00 W 00 00 00 3.5 3.0 2.5 2 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 12 10 8 6 4 2 _ 0 -2 v -4 -6 v -8 3 -10 -12 o -14 c� -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 40 A N 00 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 6 Year 5 (2018 Data) A A lf1 lf1 lf1 l!1 l!� Ol Ol 01 Ol V V V V V 00 00 OG W l0 l0 l0 l0 F-� F-` N I--� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O O F-' N F-' 00N l0 m ID Ol W L- N N lLnFD N I--` F-` N W VF-` N N F A -` (Il 00 N \ \ \ \ V A \ \ \ N \ O V A N \ A pp 00 I--` \ f-+ lfl N l0N m \ \ N N \ \ \ N \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ W F0 F+ 00 00 N F+ N 0000 F+ N F+ N W W W W 00 00 W OG 00 00 F+ F+ N F+ 00 N \ \ 00 OG 00 00 O� 00 00 OG 00 00 00 00 00 W W W 00 00 00 00 3.5 3.0 2.5 c 0 0 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 w m 12April 14 10 Growing Season 8 Sta rt 6 4 01 2 _ 0 -2 d -4 � -6 a -8 3 -10 -12 'o -14 c7 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 0000 0000 0000 00 00 0000 0000 0000 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 7 Year 5 (2018 Data) 3.5 3.0 2.5 O1 01 O O1 V V V V V 00 00 00 W l0 lD l0 l0 N F+ N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O O \ N l0 0) \ O V A F� 00 F� 00 In N tOO N \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ pl W 00 I--` I--' N 00 I--' I--' N I--' 00 F� F� I--' 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 N N 00 00 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 8 Year 5 (2018 Data) 12 10 8 6 4 2 October Growing End 21 Season April 14 Growing Season Start A A- 0 c 2 4 > -6 y -8 3 -10 -12 'o 191 Da vs -14 W -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 1 11 -40 0 00 Ij F+ 00 41 N 00 N 00 00 U, N \ 00 00 N \ 00 N \ 00 lf1 N 00 N \ 00 W \ 00 N \ 00 W N 00 I--` \ 00 F-` \ 00 N \ 00 W \ 00 V N 00 I--' \ 00 N \ 00 N \ 00 A N 00 N 00 \ \ F0 00 00 N \ F+ 00 0 N \ F+ 00 0 � \ N 00 0 � Ql N 00 0 N W N W 3.5 3.0 2.5 2 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 9 — _ —. 3.5 3.0 2.s 0 2.0 a 1.s 1.0 0.5 0.0 Growing Season H nStart OctoberM Growing SeasonM ' moi WINE mm U■ EEEI�I� ■!■71�■��■ !1■ ■I■�■� mow■ n■ I■■■� ISI �■■ ■■■ ■I■�■ �■I �■!f■ n■ I■■TI■ Iw I • now IIIIIIIIIIII■1m HEIN I■M III ■7 �■�■� ■7■ IN m WWI 3.5 3.0 2.s 0 2.0 a 1.s 1.0 0.5 0.0 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 w a -4 J -6 8 f0 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 40 A N N 00 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 10 Year 5 (2018 Data) A A In In p In In N N Q1 Q1 V V V V V 00 00 00 00 lD lD lD �D V VL\ N N Ul N FO N W 0 N N W V N N 00 A N 0000 A \ \ l N lD \ N lD Ol \ O V A N \ A N 00 \ F+ Ll N lD a,00 00 00 00 00 00 N 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3.5 3.0 c 2.5 c 3 O E 2.0 a �o c m W 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 11 Year 5 (2018 Data) 3.5 3.0 2.5 'o 2.0 w E 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 14r■ nApril nGrowingSeason�■ N Start 11111111111�v SEEN �l MEIN ONE M11 0 NONNI HER ■�ml� NE1111I11II ■a mm OEM u■ iii■�■■■■i■�m�� n■ �■�� iii■■■ ■■■ �M= n■ I■■■m -nm ISI i■■ ■■■ ■imp= 1110111■I �mm n■ l■■ l!� 11w■I ■■w ■I■I �■�I■ mm Imm III INP■ IN m WWI lol•■ 3.5 3.0 2.5 'o 2.0 w E 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 12 12 April 14 Growing Season 10 8 Growing Season 6 Start 4 2 0 _ -2 w -4 a -6 J _8 d -10 -12 191 Days 3 -14 ° -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 26 - 4 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 A A A (n U1 U1 0000 F\-� V1 N V1 N m W m N m N m N V W V N V N V N v W 00 V 00 N 00 N 00 N W A l0 W N N In N O \ V \ A \ 00 \ 00 00 \ (,n 00 N l0 \ 00 N lD m \ CO O J A 00 A N 00 \ 00 F-. 00 In N lO 00 \ \ 00 CO W 00 00 OD 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 W 00 00 CO 00 W 00 00 00 00 00 3.5 3.0 2.5 c c 3 2.0 a �o .E- m m 1.5 at 1.0 0.5 0.0 12 10 8 6 4 2 _ 0 2 d -4 � -6 y -8 3 -10 -12 c -14 t� -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 -38 -40 A A N N 00 00 Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 13 Year 5 (2018 Data) 3.5 3.0 2.5 E A In Ln In In In 0) 0) 01 0) V V V V V 00 00 00 00 to ID LD lD 4, A \ \ V1 N lD \ N l0 0) \ O V A A F-` \ N 00 \ F+ 00 (n N lD N N M W F+ 00 00 N N - 00 N N N 00 F+ N F-` F-` 00 N N N 00 F+ F+ F+ N N \ \ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 co 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2826ini1g; p 59= ( 02!11!2016 05:20PM MARTP51 f - 2802iniig3 53 X33 i 2018 09:60AM MA RTC 51 C/30/18 R a � l ............ .. : . . . . . . . . . . . � _. s 4 W'� 7, _ rp. i f - 2802iniig3 53 X33 i 2018 09:60AM MA RTC 51 C/30/18 R a � ............ .. : . . . . . . . . . . . � _. s 4 W'� � _. 4 7, i 'V � , ' 28.40inHg1 8 6t'F 10116!2018 06': 20PM MARTD51 28.37inHgf 8 41'F ( 1110712018 10 [30AM MARTD51 Martin's Creek # Sample Time -Lapse Photos from MC UTlR2(Upstream Camera) 1±19!8— mot Martin's Creta en Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year5w5(2018) DMS Project Number gga December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices Martin's Creta en Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year5w5(2018) DMS Project Number gga December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices APPENDIX F WETLAND CONFIRMATION DATA Figure 3. Wetland Confirmation Overview Wetland Dataforms Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices UT1R3 r r b... 4 i.. ;!If ��. 1r�t' y � .- ^ icy � t.� � r. �..'• 7W Axiom Environmental 218 Snow Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 (919) 215-1693 Axiom Environmental, Inc. WETLAND CONFIRMATION OVERVIEW MARTINS CREEK II DMS PROJECT # 92633 Cherokee County, North Carolina Legend C3Easement Boundary Streams C3Wetland Restoration (Original Delineation) = 5.20 acres Wetland Enhancement (Original Delineation) = 1.61 acres = 2018 Wetland Delineation = 9.13 acres E2 Powerline Right of Way 0 125 250 500 Feet Dwn. by. KRJ FIGURE Date: Nov 2018 3 Project: 12-004.16 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: Martins Creek II City/County: Murphy/Cherokee Sampling Date: 180503 Applicant/Owner: NC DMS State: NC Sampling Point: PG 05up Investigator(s): Perkinson, Keith - Axiom Section, Township, Range: Murphy Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 8 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 130B Lat: 35.053553 Long: -84.027654 Datum: WGS-84 Soil Map Unit Name: Thurmont-Dillard Complex NWI classification: Upland Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation n Soil n or Hydrology n significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation n Soil n or Hydrology n naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Upland HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks (136) _Surface Water (Al) _True Aquatic Plants (B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) —Drainage Patterns (B10) —Saturation (A3) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) —Moss Trim Lines (1316) —Water Marks (B1) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _Thin Muck Surface (C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _Iron Deposits (135) _Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _Shallow Aquitard (D3) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) _Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Upland US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: PG_05up Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Hpsoiute uominant inaicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Liriodendron tulipifera 15 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species 2. Quercus alba 5 Yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 3. Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) 5. Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B) 7. Prevalence Index worksheet: 20 =Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 1. Carpinus caroliniana 5 Yes FAC FAC species 15 x 3 = 45 2. Ilex opaca 5 Yes FACU species 30 x 4 = 120 3. UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 4. Column Totals: 45 (A) 165 (B) 5. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.67 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 9. 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0' 10 =Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1. Dennstaedtia punctilobula 10 Yes FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 2. present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. 4. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 5, more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6 height. 7• Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 9 m) tall. 10. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 10 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 height. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Yes FAC 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic 10 =Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 Present? Yes No X Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: PG 05up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-4 10yr 3/3 100 Loamy/Clayey 4-7 10yr 5/2 100 Loamy/Clayey 7-12 10yr 6/3 100 Loamy/Clayey Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) —Black Histic (A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) —Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) —Red Parent Material (F21) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, _Other (Explain in Remarks) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136) —Sandy Redox (S5) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _Stripped Matrix (S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Dark Surface (S7) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils, Version 8.0, 2016. Upland US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: Martins Creek II City/County: Murphy/Cherokee Sampling Date: 180503 Applicant/Owner: NC DMS State: NC Sampling Point: PG 05w Investigator(s): Perkinson, Keith - Axiom Section, Township, Range: Murphy Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 8 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 130B Lat: 35.053553 Long: -84.027654 Datum: WGS-84 Soil Map Unit Name: Thurmont-Dillard Complex NWI classification: Headwater Forest Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation n Soil n or Hydrology n significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation n Soil n or Hydrology n naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Average rainfall for past three months prior to assessment HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks (136) X Surface Water (Al) _True Aquatic Plants (B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) —Drainage Patterns (B10) x Saturation (A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _Moss Trim Lines (1316) —Water Marks (B1) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _Crayfish Burrows (C8) —Drift Deposits (B3) X Thin Muck Surface (C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _Iron Deposits (135) _Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _Shallow Aquitard (D3) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) _Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1 Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Shallow water table US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: PG_05w Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Hpsoiute uominant inaicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Carpinus caroliniana 15 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 2. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) 3. Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 5. Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) 7. Prevalence Index worksheet: 15 =Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 20 x 2 = 40 1. Tiarella cordifolia 10 Yes FAC FAC species 35 x 3 = 105 2. Arisaema triphyllum 10 Yes FACW FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 3. Osmundastrum cinnamomeum 10 Yes FACW UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 4. Column Totals: 55 (A) 145 (B) 5. Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.64 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 9. X 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0' 30 =Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1. Microstegium vimineum 10 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 2. present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. 4. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 5, more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6 height. 7• Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 9 m) tall. 10. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 10 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 height. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic =Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: PG_05w Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-2 10yr 3/1 100 Muck thin layer of mucky 2-5 10yr 3/1 100 Mucky Loam/Clay Rock/saprolite Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) —Black Histic (A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) —Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) X 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) —Red Parent Material (F21) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, _Other (Explain in Remarks) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136) —Sandy Redox (S5) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _Stripped Matrix (S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Dark Surface (S7) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils, Version 8.0, 2016. thin mucky layer, soil profile is very shallow. Couldn't dig below rocky saprolite layer.. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: Martins Creek II City/County: Murphy/Cherokee Sampling Date: 180503 Applicant/Owner: NC DMS State: NC Sampling Point: PI 103up Investigator(s): Perkinson, Keith - Axiom Section, Township, Range: Murphy Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 7 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 130B Lat: 35.055151 Long: -84.027849 Datum: WGS-84 Soil Map Unit Name: Braddock loam 8-15% slopes NWI classification: UPL Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation n Soil n or Hydrology n significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation n Soil n or Hydrology n naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Upland HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks (136) _Surface Water (Al) _True Aquatic Plants (B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) —Drainage Patterns (B10) —Saturation (A3) —Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) —Moss Trim Lines (1316) —Water Marks (B1) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _Sediment Deposits (62) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _Thin Muck Surface (C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _Iron Deposits (135) _Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _Shallow Aquitard (D3) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) _Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: outside of seep near top of crenulation US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Rubus spp. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. is 50% of total cover: 5 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Lonicera japonica 2. 3. 4. 5. 10 Yes iaicatc Status FACU 3 FAC FAC FACU 4 10 =Total Cover 20% of total cover: 2 15 Yes FACU 15 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3 Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Sampling Point: PI_103up Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 15 x 3 = 45 FACU species 35 x 4 = 140 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 50 (A) 185 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.70 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 Prevalence Index is 553.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 HDsoiute uominant Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? 1. Linodendron tulipifera 15 Yes 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 15 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) 1. Acer rubrum 10 Yes 2. Rhododendron maximum 5 Yes 3. Ilex opaca 5 Yes 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 20 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Rubus spp. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. is 50% of total cover: 5 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. Lonicera japonica 2. 3. 4. 5. 10 Yes iaicatc Status FACU 3 FAC FAC FACU 4 10 =Total Cover 20% of total cover: 2 15 Yes FACU 15 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3 Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Sampling Point: PI_103up Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 15 x 3 = 45 FACU species 35 x 4 = 140 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 50 (A) 185 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.70 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 Prevalence Index is 553.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: PI_103up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-3 10yr 4/2 95 Loamy/Clayey o/a horizon 3-12 10yr 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) —Black Histic (A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) —Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) —Red Parent Material (F21) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, _Other (Explain in Remarks) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136) —Sandy Redox (S5) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _Stripped Matrix (S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Dark Surface (S7) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils, Version 8.0, 2016. Upland US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: UT to Martins Creek II City/County: Murphy/Cherokee Sampling Date: 180503 Applicant/Owner: NC DMS State: NC Sampling Point: PI 103w Investigator(s): Perkinson, Keith - Axiom Section, Township, Range: Murphy Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 7 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 130B Lat: 35.055151 Long: -84.027849 Datum: WGS-84 Soil Map Unit Name: Braddock loam 8-15% slopes NWI classification: Headwater Forest Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation n Soil n or Hydrology n significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation n Soil n or Hydrology n naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Rainfall is average for three month period prior ro delineation HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks (136) _Surface Water (Al) _True Aquatic Plants (B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) —Drainage Patterns (B10) X Saturation (A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _Moss Trim Lines (1316) —Water Marks (B1) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _Sediment Deposits (62) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _Crayfish Burrows (C8) —Drift Deposits (B3) _Thin Muck Surface (C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _Iron Deposits (135) _Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _Shallow Aquitard (D3) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) _Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: spring at top of hill just outside of easement, heavy flow many obligate wetland plants US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: PI -103w Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Hpsoiute uominant inaicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 2. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A) 3. Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) 5. Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) 7. Prevalence Index worksheet: 15 =Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 25 x 2 = 50 1. Nyssa sylvatica 10 Yes FAC FAC species 30 x 3 = 90 2. Rhododendron maximum 5 Yes FAC FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 3. Ilex decidua 5 Yes FACW UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 4. Column Totals: 55 (A) 140 (B) 5. Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.55 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 9. X 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0' 20 =Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1. Osmundastrum cinnamomeum 10 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 2. Impatiens capensis 10 Yes FACW present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. 4. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or 5, more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6 height. 7• Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 9 m) tall. 10. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 20 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 height. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytic =Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: PI_103w Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-4 10yr 4/1 95 10yr 5/6 5 c m Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 4-8 10yr 6/1 90 10yr 5/8 10 c m Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 8-12 n 5/ 97 10yr 5/6 3 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) —Black Histic (A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) X Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) —Stratified Layers (A5) X Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) —Red Parent Material (F21) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) X Redox Depressions (F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, _Other (Explain in Remarks) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136) —Sandy Redox (S5) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _Stripped Matrix (S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Dark Surface (S7) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils, Version 8.0, 2016. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: UT to Martins II City/County: Murphy/Cherokee Sampling Date: 180503 Applicant/Owner: NCDMS State: NC Sampling Point: PI -112w Investigator(s): Perkinson Axiom Section, Township, Range: Murphy Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 130A Lat: 35.053862 Long: -84.024789 Datum: WGS-84 Soil Map Unit Name: AkA Arkaqua loam, 0-2% slopes occasionally flooded NWI classification: Bottomland Hardwood Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Rainfall is within normal limites per WETS Tables at time of delineation HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks (136) _Surface Water (Al) _True Aquatic Plants (B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) —Drainage Patterns (B10) X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _Moss Trim Lines (1316) —Water Marks (B1) —Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _Crayfish Burrows (C8) —Drift Deposits (B3) _Thin Muck Surface (C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Other (Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _Iron Deposits (135) _Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _Shallow Aquitard (D3) —Water -Stained Leaves (139) _Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 6 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Wetland restoration site, gaugesthroughout restoration areas have generally been within 12" of ground surface during growing season t US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Juncus effusus 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. is 50% of total cover: 10 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 20 Yes FACW 20 =Total Cover 20% of total cover: 4 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Sampling Point: PI -112w Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 35 x 1 = 35 FACW species 20 x 2 = 40 FAC species 0 x 3 = 0 FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 55 (A) 75 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.36 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% X 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 Hpsoiute uominant inaicatc Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status 1. Salix nigra 15 Yes OBL 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 15 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) 1. Salix nigra 10 Yes OBL 2. Alnus serrulata 10 Yes OBL 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 20 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 1. Juncus effusus 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. is 50% of total cover: 10 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 20 Yes FACW 20 =Total Cover 20% of total cover: 4 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Sampling Point: PI -112w Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 35 x 1 = 35 FACW species 20 x 2 = 40 FAC species 0 x 3 = 0 FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 55 (A) 75 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.36 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% X 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: PI -112w Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-5 10yr 4/3 90 10yr 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations 5-12 10yr 4/2 90 10yr 4/6 10 c m Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) —Black Histic (A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) (MLRA 147, 148) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) —Stratified Layers (A5) X Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) —Red Parent Material (F21) —Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) X Redox Depressions (F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, _Other (Explain in Remarks) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) MLRA 136) —Sandy Redox (S5) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _Stripped Matrix (S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Dark Surface (S7) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils, Version 8.0, 2016. Reduced matrix at boundary, wetlands also include F8 indicator. Site generally has standing water throughout winter month, drying through summer. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0 APPENDIX G SUPPLEMENTAL DATA Figure 4. USGS Topography Map Figure 5. Soils Map Preconstruction Photographs Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices I f' iif � it J LEGEND: Project Reach Project Wetlands o stem E an�ement r I ggg9 �` �1- Com• ■ * f _-�� '�. j � 5 douse` Figure 4. USGS Topography Streams Q Watershed Boundary Map (Murphy Quad) Martin Creek Mitigation Project Cherokee County, NC 0 400 800 1,600 Feet f -� r ,� F•r�.�;../gip*r � ;'✓• ,�' it �`I ggg9 �` �1- Com• ■ * f _-�� '�. j � 5 douse` Figure 4. USGS Topography Streams Q Watershed Boundary Map (Murphy Quad) Martin Creek Mitigation Project Cherokee County, NC 0 400 800 1,600 Feet Martin's Creek II Preconstruction Photographs Taken from Mitigation Plan (dated September 2010) Martin's Creek hank erosion Martin's Creek II Final Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2018) DMS Project Number 92633 December 2018 Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices