20181096 Ver 1_Draft Mitigation Plan_20180529

KCI Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
MITIGATION PLAN
DRAFT
January 17, 2019
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
Surry County, North Carolina
Action ID # SAW -2018-00712
Yadkin River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03040101
Prepared for:
USACE, Wilmington District
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Prepared by:
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
4505 Falls of Neuse Rd, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................1
2.0
WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION..........................................................................3
3.0
BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS.......................................................................................6
3.1
Watershed Processes and Resource Conditions........................................................................6
3.1.1
Landscape Characteristics.....................................................................................................
6
3.1.2
Land Use/Land Cover and Chronology of Impacts................................................................
8
3.1.3
Watershed Disturbance and Response...............................................................................12
3.1.4
Site Photographs.................................................................................................................17
4.0
FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL..............................................................................................
20
5.0
MITIGATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES.......................................................................21
6.0
DESIGN APPROACH AND MITIGATION WORK PLAN.................................................................22
6.1
Cooks Creek..............................................................................................................................
22
6.2
T1-1 and T1...............................................................................................................................22
6.3
T2-1 and T2-2............................................................................................................................23
6.4
T2..............................................................................................................................................
23
6.5
Ancillary Riparian Wetland Uplift.............................................................................................23
6.6
Crossings...................................................................................................................................24
6.7
Design Discharge Determination..............................................................................................25
6.8
Sediment...................................................................................................................................26
6.9
Planting.....................................................................................................................................28
6.10
Project Assets...........................................................................................................................
28
7.0
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS....................................................................................................
32
8.0
MONITORING PLAN..................................................................................................................32
9.0
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN...............................................................................................36
10.0
LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN...........................................................................................36
11.0
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................37
12.0
APPENDICES..............................................................................................................................39
12.1
Plan Sheets
12.2
Data Analysis/Supplemental Information and Maps
12.3
Site Protection Instrument
12.4
Credit Release Schedule
12.5
Financial Assurance
12.6
DWR Stream Identification Forms and USACE Wetland Data Sheets
12.7
Approved Jurisdictional Determination
12.8
Invasive Species
12.9
NEPA Documentation
12.10
Agency Correspondence
Draft Mitigation Plan -12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
i

FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map................................................................................................................2
Figure2. USGS Topographic Map.................................................................................................................4
Figure 3. Project Site / Watershed Map.......................................................................................................5
Figure4. Soil Survey Map..............................................................................................................................7
Figure 5. Land Use/Land Cover Map.............................................................................................................9
Figure6A. Historic Aerials...........................................................................................................................10
Figure6B. Historic Aerials...........................................................................................................................11
Figure 7. Current Conditions Plan View Map..............................................................................................16
Figure 8. Local Regional Curve Comparison................................................................................................25
Figure9. Project Asset Map........................................................................................................................31
Figure 10. Proposed Monitoring Plan.........................................................................................................35
TABLES
Table1. Credit Summary...............................................................................................................................1
Table 2. Existing Stream Bank Height and Entrenchment Ratios...............................................................12
Table 3. Project Attribute Table..................................................................................................................14
Table 4. Project Goals, Objectives, and Functional Outcomes................................................................... 21
Table 5. Local Regional Curve Data.............................................................................................................25
Table 6. Local XS Flow Compared to USGS Regression for North Carolina.................................................26
Table 7. Sediment Summary for Project Reaches.......................................................................................27
Table8. Project Asset Table........................................................................................................................ 29
Table 9. Length and Summations by Mitigation Category..........................................................................30
Table 10. Overall Assets Summary..............................................................................................................30
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
ii

1.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION
The Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank (HSSMB) is a stream mitigation project being developed as part
of the KCI Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank in the Yadkin River Basin (030401018 -digit cataloging unit)
in Surry County, North Carolina. The site's natural hydrologic regime has been substantially modified
through the relocation and straightening of the existing stream channels, an inline impoundment that has
been breached, livestock impacts, and clearing of riparian buffer. This site offers the chance to restore
impacted pasture and agricultural lands to a stable stream ecosystem with a functional riparian buffer
and floodplain access. Existing riparian wetlands, while not included as part of the mitigation credits, will
be rehabilitated as part of the project. A North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT) field visit took
place on May 29, 2018, and a final prospectus for the site was submitted in August 2018.
The HSSMB is situated in north -central Surry County. The site is located approximately 4.5 miles west of
Mount Airy, North Carolina. Specifically, the site is located off of Haystack Road (SR 1480) with the project
parcels split by 1-74. The center of the site is at approximately 36.4782, -80.7039 in the Dobson USGS
Quadrangle. The site location is shown in Figure 1.
The HSSMB will restore a stable stream ecosystem along Cooks Creek and five of its tributaries (T1, T1-1,
T2-1, T2-2, and T2) using a combination of stream restoration and enhancement techniques. Except in
transition areas, the design will dictate a Priority 1 approach to reconnect the streams with a relic
floodplain. Once site grading is complete, the riparian buffer will be planted with native tree species and
livestock will be excluded permanently. The site will be monitored for seven years or until the success
criteria are met. Table 1 indicates the proposed credit yield for the site assuming successful
implementation of the design, maintenance, and monitoring components of the project.
Table 1. Credit Summary
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank, Surry County
Mitigation Credits
Non-
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Stream
Riparian
Wetland
riparian
Buffer
Nutrient
Nutrient
Wetland
R RE
R RE
Offset
Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
Linear
2,2501f
1,8401f
Feet/Acres
Credits
2,250
989
TOTAL CREDITS
3,539*
R=Restoration RE=Restoration Equivalent *includes an additional 300 credits from stream buffer width analysis.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
1
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Project Location:
Surry County, NC
5
ora
A
AR;
age
Ra
r�
r
t
°s
'Pa
= 1W RinsSY-====-----
'C
it
`o
o r�
Oak Ridge
0
W
Red Brush Rd
L
"NN
y
Pine Ridg.
C la $sic Go It "' e
Course
�a
�a
GeOrge ChandlerIm Rh
C, R c
F � aye F
or
a�r�� H q gra
o m
° Q
N
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan,
Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),
Proposed Easement (12.4 ac) NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
0 0.25 0.5
FIGURE 1. PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP N
n
Miles
HAIR SHEEP STREAM MITIGATION BANK ,`\v
SURRY COUNTY, NC
2

2.0 WATERSHED APPROACH AND SITE SELECTION
The HSSMB is located within the Upper Yadkin River Basin (03040101), which contains the Yadkin River
and its tributaries. The primary stressors noted in the watershed for causing degradation include naturally
erodible soils; sediment and erosion from road construction and other land -disturbing activities; and
excessive stormwater flow off impervious surfaces in urban and suburban areas. Turbidity and fecal
coliform violations have been documented at sites across the basin. Nonexistent or degraded riparian
buffers along stream channels are a significant contributing factor to the habitat degradation and water
quality impairment (NCEEP 2009).
The bank will provide mitigation credits to offset unavoidable impacts to wetland and stream resources
within the Yadkin 01 River Basin where increasing development pressure has produced a significant need
for restoration projects.
Restoration priorities identified for the Upper Yadkin River Basin include restoring or protecting wetland
and stream functions, including water quality, hydrologic regime, and fish and wildlife habitat (NCEEP,
2009). The project will support the following basin priorities:
-Restoration of water quality and aquatic habitat in impaired stream segments.
-Implementation of agricultural BMPs in order to limit inputs of sediment, nutrients and fecal
coliform to streams from active farming operations.
The project watershed for the HSSMB is comprised of 0.22 square mile (139 acres). The project aims to
uphold the goals consistent with several CU -wide watershed improvement objectives by relocating a
channelized stream to its historic landscape position; installing cross-sections sized to the bankfull
discharge; creating bedform diversity with pools, riffles, and habitat structures; and fencing out livestock
to reduce sediment impacts from active grazing areas as well as from adjacent grazing and farming
practices. Cooks Creek (12-63-11-1) has been rated by Division of Water Resources (DWR) as Class C, and
is not on the 2018 draft 303(d) list. The project watershed is shown in Figure 2 and another map illustrating
the project's watershed location in relation to the Middle Fisher River (03040101090030) watershed is
included in Figure 3.
There are no conservation or protected areas located adjacent to the project site, but the project will
increase the amount of forested buffer along these headwater streams. There are no Natural Heritage
Areas located near the site.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Yv 4
n1 i't nl AI L N
UO( L
h
QI4
Q
`4
I _
� -CO
'Z: - - L/SCUM t A!
SKYL NO
F
I',$ HAVE M - CO
I(- L
()F lv'f/nit.
O _ -
R�� x
n
,A L)'a F
i
.l
TA L
1
FY`
Project Easement (12.4 ac)
Project Watershed (139 ac / 0.22 sqmi)
FIGURE 2. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP N
0 500 1,000 HAIR SHEEP STREAM MITIGATION BANK n Source: USGS National Map,
Feet SURRY COUNTY, NC N Dobson Quadrangle
4

3.0 BASELINE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Watershed Processes and Resource Conditions
3.1.1 Landscape Characteristics
The site lies within the Northern Inner Piedmont (Level IV 45e) ecoregion of the Piedmont physiographic
province. The Northern Inner Piedmont has higher elevations and more rugged topography than other
areas of the Piedmont and mostly consists of a mosaic of cropland, pasture, and forest. The natural
vegetation typically contains Virginia pine, chestnut oak, and many mountain disjunct plant species
(Griffith and Omernik 2002).
The site is located within the Alligator Back Formation and the geology of the site is mapped as having
gneiss (Zabg), a metamorphic rock, as the major constituent. The rocks are described in this setting as
being finely laminated to thin layered, and locally containing massive gneiss and micaceous granule
conglomerate, including minor portions of schist, phyllite, and amphibolite (USGS 2018). The project
streams contain a mixture of medium to very coarse gravel with inclusions of small cobble. Bedrock is
present in isolated sections on the lower end of T2. Layers of gravel and cobble are evident within the cut
banks along the lower portions of T1, T2, and Cooks Creek. The valley types are confined in the upper
reaches until they become partly confined along the lower reaches of Cooks Creek and T2.
The project streams are all mapped as the Fairview sandy clay loam soil series (Fe) (USDA 2018). This series
is described as well -drained and occurring at an interfluve or head slope interfluvial position transitioning
into floodplain soils. Just downstream of the end of T2 at the bottom of the project, the soils are mapped
as Arkaqua loam soils (ArA) along Cooks Creek. This frequently flooded soil series, which is typically found
on drainageways and floodplains, is more representative of the soils along the lower reaches of the
project. Arkaqua soils develop from loamy alluvial sediments washed from soils formed in residuum from
gneiss, schist, phyllite, and other similar rocks (USDA 2018).
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
6

ArA - Arkaqua loam"
FeB2, FeC2, FeD2 - Fairview sandy clay loam 4T
FfD - Fairview cobbly fine sandy loam
FnB2, FnC2 - Fairview cobbly sandy clay loam �.
W - Water 17
,
�-
;s, p'' C
a•
17
r ,
d f
s �
b
r
r fir-• ' � `" ''
4k,
RONv m',
Proposed Easement (12.4 ac)
FIGURE 4. NRCS SOIL SURVEY N
Source: C NRCS Soil Survey,
0 200 aoo HAIR SHEEP STREAM MITIGATION BANK su�ycounry;
Feet SURRY COUNTY, NC n NC Statewide
7 ,V

3.1.2 Land Use/Land Cover and Chronology of Impacts
The project watershed for the site is comprised of 0.22 square mile (139 acres). Current land use in the
project watershed was derived from the 2014 orthoimagery and consists of pasture/farmland (60% / 84
ac), scrub/shrub vegetation (17% / 24 ac), low-density development (16% / 23 ac), forest (3% / 4 ac), and
highway/roads (4% / 5 ac). The drainage areas for the northern and southern portions of the project are
split by Interstate 74. The current adjacent land use has a negative impact on water quality of the project
streams. This is evidenced by direct runoff from agricultural open space along parts of the stream where
there is no riparian buffer and that livestock have direct access to all of the project reaches. KCI's
measurement of the total impervious area for the watershed is approximately 5%, which is based on the
land use delineated from the 2014 orthoimagery and based on published average impervious values for
land use categories (Center for Watershed Protection 2003).
The HSSMB has undergone significant modifications that have altered the site hydrology and vegetation.
Historic aerials were examined for any information about how the site has changed over recent history.
The reviewed aerials are included in Figures 6A and 6B. Historic aerials were obtained from the USGS
EarthExplorer and NCOneMap for 1950, 1966, 1976, 1993, 1998, 2005, 2010, and 2014.
The site has been systematically impacted by land clearing, grazing, and road development over the past
67 years. In the earliest aerial photo from 1950, the portions of the buffer along the northern and southern
streams have been cleared, with about half of the buffer remaining. It appears that most of the land that
has been cleared has not become utilized for agriculture yet, and there is no road along the current
interstate route.
By 1966 more complete clearing has occurred to convert the site to agriculture. Also, a pond has been
constructed at the downstream limits of the southern project streams. A farm path or road is evident
upslope and south of T1 and Cooks Creek along the ridgeline on the northern part of the project.
By 1976 there has been more clearing in the project area, but generally the site looks similar to the
previous aerial. Two ponds, one large and then one small, have been constructed upslope of the lower
end of T2 to capture incoming hillside flow. Seventeen years later, in 1993, the vegetation around portions
of the northern tributaries has grown back and the upslope drainage paths are visible. The farm road is
more prominent along the ridgeline. Also, in the southern portion of the project, there appear to be
multiple flowpaths in portions of lower T2 floodplain, potentially indicating wetlands, which there is
evidence of today. The pond below the downstream end of T2 has been drained.
By 1998, Interstate 74 or its precursor has been built, modifying the drainage areas for both portions of
the project, but particularly for T2. The middle portion of the original watershed now drains the interstate
and flows further to the east outside of the project. All riparian areas in the easement have been cleared
except for the upper reaches of T2-1 and T2-2. Also visible is the former ponded section on T2, which
resulted in highly sinuous channel. The pond is not seen in earlier aerial photographs, but evidence of the
pond has been found on-site and the aerial indicates it must have breached at some point prior to 1998.
Between 1998 and 2014, portions of the proposed project easement have been allowed to grow up to
early successional vegetative communities, while other areas have been kept clear for livestock grazing.
Over the 67 years of available record, both physical and functional impacts to the project streams have
been documented. These impacts included: channel modification and dam construction, land use and
drainage impacts from adjacent timber harvesting and road construction, unrestricted livestock access,
and general riparian vegetation removal.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
8

a '4
Wt
r
z " (>
w'b'
F f .
Y
d% R pr + '
}
i �'. � ��.� �� ' � fir. ;, ¢ � � �, i�y��,-'' r`► � ��
A _N � Ilk
L 16
9` W
s I tiF apA'
i ) �
Q Project Easement (12.4 ac) Low Density Development (23 ac)
Q Project Watershed (139 ac / 0.22 sqmi) Highway/Road (5 ac)'.,
Pasture/Farmland (84 ac) Forest (4 ac)
Scrub Shrub Vegetation (24 ac)
0 250 500 FIGURE 5. PROJECT WATERSHED LAND USE N
HAIR SHEEP STREAM MITIGATION BANK Image Source: Statewide
Orthoimagery, 20101 4.
Feet SURRY COUNTY, NC Land Cover from Imagery.
9

END
y 4
1998 s`n 2005
.r,
12010
0.
Project Easement
FIGURE 6B. HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS N
0 300 600 HAIR SHEEP STREAM MITIGATION BANK Image Source:
Feet SURRY COUNTY, NC NC OneMap
11

3.1.3 Watershed Disturbance and Response
The project has experienced landscape and vegetative modifications to allow for agriculture and livestock
management along the six project streams as seen in Figure 7. There are two primary drainages associated
with this project. The first, in the northern portion of the site, includes the named stream, Cooks Creek,
and two unnamed tributaries, T1 and T1-1. The second, in the southern portion of the site, includes three
additional unnamed tributaries: T2, T2-1, and T2-2. The confluence of Cooks Creek and T2 is approximately
330 linear feet (If) downstream of the southern project boundary. All of the streams have small drainage
areas in relation to their flow, but the base hydrologic source is primarily groundwater -driven from springs
and hillside seepage flow with minor additions from surface water. However, surface runoff from storm
events shaped the channels and induced the active channel evolution evident today.
As a result of the historical modifications to the watershed as documented in the previous section, the
project streams have been subject to a changing storm hydrograph, vegetation removal, and hoof shear
that have all impacted the existing conditions. Approximately 36% of the project streams have bank height
ratios greater than 1.5. Livestock have historically had an impact on the site and they still have full access
to all of the project streams.
Table 2. Existing Stream Bank Height and Entrenchment Ratios
Stream
Existing Bank Height Ratio
Existing Entrenchment Ratio
Cooks Creek
1.0-5.0
1.3-2.5
T1
1.6-2.2
1.4-3.1
T2-1
8.0
1.1
T2-2
6.1
1.3
T2
1.3-2.1
1.4-3.1
Cooks Creek comes onto the project at the northeastern easement boundary, where the stream flows
along the wooded backyards of residential parcels. Once onto the project, the stream flows for
approximately 725 If, and varies between being confined to partly confined. Along the left bank, there is
a floodprone area of varying width with several incoming seeps; the bank condition varies dependent on
the amount of vegetation. The right bank is against a steeper, cleared slope accessible to livestock, and
there is severe erosion with shear bank heights of 5-6 feet along the outer right meander bends and in
other confined sections. The upper half of Cooks Creek is incised with bank height ratios over 1.5; the
lower portion of Cooks Creek is less confined as it nears the confluence with T1, but there are still areas
of bank erosion and livestock impacts. The bed of Cooks Creek is comprised of medium to very coarse
gravel intermixed with small cobble, but it lacks well-developed pool morphology. The riparian buffer of
Cooks Creek has early successional vegetation along the eastern side of the stream, primarily in the form
of tag alder (Alnus serrulata), and the western side alternates between no vegetation and a narrow mix
of brush.
T1 and T1-1 both begin on a hillslope below Interstate 74 and are spring -fed channels that flow southeast
toward Cooks Creek. They have been channelized and flow parallel to each other, with spoil between
them. The drainage area and routing of T1 was likely affected bythe interstate construction. Each tributary
has its own separate hydrologic source. T1-1 begins at a headcut below a spring at the end of a series of
headcuts, where agricultural runoff flows down the valley. The headcuts have been filled with trash and
debris in an attempt to stabilize the bed. This channel is deeper than the neighboring T1 and is littered
with tires and other trash. T1-1 has isolated areas of bank erosion and most of the channelized stream is
narrow and confined with minimal access to a floodprone bench. The bed does have coarse material that
protects it from further incision, but there is minimal variation in the bed features themselves.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
12

T1 begins at a spring/seep on a hillside. The spring was stabilized with rock at some point in its history, so
there is no significant erosion at the spring, but the channel has poorly-defined bed and bank features
because of livestock impacts. The first 100 If flow through an existing riparian wetland. As T1 continues
downstream, some bed variability has formed, but the channel has low functional value due to the
degraded riparian buffer and damage from livestock. As T1 and T1-1 come together, the condition of T1
is mixed, with tires and other trash still present in the channel and the banks varying between areas of
low and moderate bank erosion and incision. The flow of T1 becomes perennial approximately 150 If after
the T1 and T1-1 confluence. There is a headcut on T1 as it gets closer to Cooks Creek, after which the
stream continues to flow southeast until the confluence. The vegetation along T1-1 and T1 is mostly in an
early successional state.
The southern portion of the site has three project streams; T2-1 and T2-2 make up the headwaters of T2,
which begins after the confluence of the two upper streams. T2-1 is an intermittent stream that starts at
a headcut and flows about 300 If south where it transitions to a perennial stream at a headcut. T2-1
continues to flow for another 80 If where it joins T2-2. T2-2 is a perennial stream that begins at a headcut
and flows approximately 290 If to its confluence with T2-1. T2 starts at a fence line at the confluence of
T2-1 and T2-2 and flows generally southeast. At the start of T2, the landscape transitions to a wide valley
bottom that used to function as an integrated stream/wetland bottomland. There are still wetland
pockets and seeps on the southwestern side of the stream. Based on the historic aerials that show multiple
flow paths in this part of the valley, it is likely that the stream was channelized to drain the wetland area
and encourage flow to T2.
The majority of T2 has banks that are vertical and eroding. Livestock have damaged much of the channel
and the stream has headcuts and the upper section has a highly sinuous, unstable planform.
Approximately 350 If from the start of T2, the stream flows through an existing dilapidated culvert and
then a headcut occurs 275 If after that.
Following that, there is a breached pond berm about halfway down the project reach. The pond is not
evident in any of the historic aerials, but it likely caused the unstable planform in that part of the channel.
The abandoned pond riser can be seen adjacent to the channel below the old pond berm. The valley
bottom is generally flat with a low gradient towards the bottom of the project reach, but then the slope
increases and the channel straightens as it flows off of the project parcel. The northern side of the channel
has been generally kept clear of vegetation, but the southern side of the channel has been allowed to fill
with scrubby, early successional vegetation, including invasive species such as multiflora rose, Callery
pear, tree of heaven, Japanese honeysuckle, and Chinese privet.
The descriptions above detail how the modifications to this landscape from livestock and vegetation
removal have resulted in the present day condition of the project streams. These streams represent a
variety of drainage sizes, hydrologic sources, and functional impairments. For more information on the
stream conditions, see the stream forms in Section 12.6.
A jurisdictional determination was submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers on June 11, 2018 and a
USACE field visit was conducted on June 25, 2018. The approved JD was received on November 20, 2018
and is included in the appendix.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
13
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Table 3. Project Attribute Table
Project Name
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
County
Surry County
Project Area (acres)
12.4
Project Coordinates (lat. and
long.)
36.4782 N, 80.7039 W
Planted Acreage (Acres of
Woody Stems Planted)
12.0
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03040101
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03040101090030
DWR Sub -basin
03-07-02
Project Drainage Area (acres)
139 acres
Project Drainage Area
Percentage of Impervious Area
5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Pasture/Farmland (60%/ 84 ac), Scrub/Shrub vegetation (17% / 24 ac), Low -Density
Development (16% / 23 ac), Forest (3%/ 4 ac), and Highway/Roads (4%/ 5 ac)
Existing Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Cooks Creek
T1 and T3-1
T2-1 and T2-2
T2
Length of reach (linear feet)
725
986
658
2,025
Valley Confinement
Confined
Confined
Confined
Confined
Drainage area (acres)
58
24 acres
21 acres
75 acres
Perennial, Intermittent,
Ephemeral
Perennial
Intermittent/
Perennial
Intermittent/
Perennial
Perennial
NCDWQ Water Quality
Classification
C
C
C
C
Rosgen Classification
(Existing/Proposed)
G4/C4b
G4/E4b
G4/F4b
F4/G4
Evolutionary trend (Simon)
Stage III
Stage III
Stage III
Stage III
FEMA classification
None
None
None
None
Existing Wetland
Summary Information
Parameters
Size of Wetland (acres)
0.34 (WA)
0.34 (WB and WC)
0.03 (WD)
Wetland Type
Headwater Forest
Headwater Forest
Headwater Forest
Mapped Soil Series
Fairview sandy clay loam Fairview sandy clay loam Fairview sandy clay loam
Drainage class
Well Drained
Well Drained
Well Drained
Soil Hydric Status
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Floodplain/Groundwater Floodplain/Groundwater Floodplain/Groundwater
Restoration or Enhancement
Method
N/A
N/A
N/A
"Items addressed in the Categorical Exclusion in Appendix.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
14
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Table 3, continued
Regulatory Considerations
Supporting
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Documentation
Waters of the United States —
Applying for
JD has been received and will submit for
Section 404
Yes
NWP 27
permit.
Waters of the United States —
Applying for
JD has been received and will submit for
Yes
Section 401
NWP 27
permit.
Endangered Species Act**
Yes
Yes
USFWS
Historic Preservation Act**
No
Yes
NCSHPO
Coastal Zone Management Act **
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area
No
N/A
N/A
Management Act (CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
Yes
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat**
No
N/A
N/A
**Items addressed in the Categorical Exclusion in Appendix.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
15
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

N
Perennial Streams
Headcuts ,-
Cattle Wallows
DitchN; .:
Breached Crossing Pipe
Former Dam
Existing Wetlands
Off -Site Streams
EML
FIGURE 7. CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW N
0 125 250 HAIR SHEEP STREAM MITIGATION BANK,n\ Source: NCOneMap
Feet SURRY COUNTY, NC �\ Orthoimagery, 2014.
16 , V

3.1.4 Site Photographs
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
17

byk
�,4,M-
4
x.
"
• • •' • •'1111KRUM1174ORIERILMR6 • •
- , , - �,�,J 0 11�1 ', . " 7
wwrTw
1- �#
Photo 9: Downstream look at headcut at the start of T2-1
Photo 11: Looking downstream from the start of T2-2
Photo 10: Looking downstream at incised section of T2-1.
Photo 12: A downstream view of confluence of T2-1 from
lower right and T2-2 from upper left.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
IV

Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
19

4.0 FUNCTIONAL UPLIFT POTENTIAL
Based on the current stream and watershed conditions at the HSSMB, there is a high potential for
functional improvements at this site. A suite of stream functions have been compromised across this
system. Hydraulic functions have been affected by the direct modifications to the channel such as
relocation and livestock and by watershed processes from anthropogenic disturbances and land use
changes that have caused incision, bank erosion, and disconnection from the floodplain. These alterations
have compromised the geomorphologic functions of the channel. This condition is exacerbated by the
poor riparian buffer and other sources of direct agricultural runoff. All of the stream channels have low
functional values. This project offers a chance to restore these degraded streams and bring functional
uplift to this entire system.
The primary uplift for the HSSMB will beach ieved at the hydraulic and geomorphological functional levels.
Reestablishing floodplain connectivity with a Priority 1 Restoration will allow stream flows to access the
floodplain area more frequently, providing uplift of hydraulic functions within this system that will
distribute flood flows through a wider area instead of within a confined channel. Geomorphological
functional uplift will be achieved by sizing channels to the bankfull flow, by creating a planform and profile
design that emphasizes bedform variation, and by establishing a native riparian corridor through the
removal of invasive species. As a result, bank migration and lateral stability will be restored to a
sustainable level and the banks and bed will accommodate design flows in a stable manner. Sediment
inputs will decrease due to reduced bank erosion and sediment transport can return to a stable level that
will accommodate watershed inputs. Riparian plantings will further support geomorphological
functionality by increasing bank stability.
Consideration of future impacts to the area that could limit functional uplift opportunities is important
when assessing project potential. Aside from the development of the Interstate 74 corridor in between
the two halves of the project site, there has been little change in the land use over the past fifty years and
future development pressures are considered to be low. All of the project streams except Cooks Creek
have their origins on the site, and these reaches present an opportunity to protect and improve valuable
headwater systems. The existing 0.71 acre of riparian wetlands is also being protected as part of the
project easement and will be integrated into the restored stream systems. The table below summarizes
the project goals and objectives that will lead to functional improvements and the monitoring tools that
will be used to track these changes to the site.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
20

5.0 MITIGATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Table 4. Project Goals, Objectives, and Functional Outcomes
Goals
Objective
Functional Level
Function -Based
Monitoring Measurement
Parameter Effects
Relocate or stabilize
channelized and/or
Flood Frequency
incised streams to
Hydraulics
Floodplain
Restore
connect to a floodplain
Connectivity
Bank Height Ratio and
channelized and
or floodprone area
Entrenchment Ratio
livestock -
impacted
Install a cross-section
Bank
Cross -Sectional Survey
streams to
sized to the bankfull
Geomorphology
Migration/Lateral
stable C4 and
discharge
Stability
Visual Inspection of Bank Stability
C4b type
channels
Create bedform
Percent Riffle and Pool, Facet
diversity with pools,
Slopes, Visual Inspection
riffles, and habitat
Geomorphology
Bed Form Diversity
Visual Inspection of Feature
structures
Maintenance
Fence out livestock to
reduce sediment
Restore a
impacts from adjacent
Geomorphology
Bed Material
Pebble Count
forested riparian
grazing and farming
Characterization
buffer to provide
practices to the project
bank stability,
tributaries.
filtration, and
Plant the site with
Geomorphology/
Density
Y
shading
native trees and shrubs
and an herbaceous
Species
Vegetation
seed mix.
Composition
Species Composition/Diversity
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
21
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

6.0 DESIGN APPROACH AND MITIGATION WORK PLAN
The project streams were designed using a modified reference reach approach using a local regional curve
developed from stable reference cross-sections. In addition to the data from the on-site references,
common reference values from Harmon et al. 2011 were also used to aid the development of the design
criteria. The proposed channel design values have been adjusted as necessary to fit the existing site
conditions based on these sources.
6.1 Cooks Creek
This is the primary drainage on the northern portion of the site and involves improving the upper 460 If
(Stations 10+00 to 14+60) with Enhancement I and the remaining 258 If (Stations 14+60 to 17+18) with
Enhancement II techniques, generating 410 SMCs for this stream. The design challenges for the
Enhancement I reach include severe bank erosion on outer right bends, bank instability on the left banks,
and a lack of established riffle -pool bed morphology. In -stream work will focus on bank stabilization,
benching, and bedform stabilization. This reach does have intact gravel/cobble riffles; profile work will
preserve these areas while enhancing or adding pool features. The lower Enhancement II reach of Cooks
Creek moves away from the steep slopes to the west and has a broader floodprone area. The stream is
beginning to adjust to prior impacts, and the mitigation work will complement the existing stable features
with bank stabilization and benching in areas as needed. Although Cooks Creek was previously cleared of
riparian vegetation in the past, alders have established themselves along the banks. These existing shrubs
will be preserved and protected wherever possible, and transplanting will be attempted if removal is
needed. In addition to the channel work, livestock exclusion fencing will be installed to keep all livestock
out of the channel and the easement will be treated for invasive species.
6.2 T1-1 and T1
These two channels are in close proximity to each other and will share a mitigation approach. T1-1
(Stations 30+00 to 31+41) will be improved with Enhancement I for approximately 141 If; T1 will have
three different reaches: Enhancement II for 176 If (Stations 20+00 to 21+76), Enhancement I for 349 If
(STA 21+76 to 25+25), and 320 If of Enhancement II (STA 25+25 to 28+45) before reaching the confluence
with Cooks Creek. Together these four enhancement reaches will generate 525 SMCs. Work on T1-1 will
begin first by repairing active gullies and sediment sources upstream of the start of the channel. Direct
livestock impacts and upstream agricultural runoff have caused a severe headcut upstream of the start of
intermittent flow. This area will be stabilized with an approximately 15' x 30' BMP, which will arrest the
headcut with a boulder step and then maintain pool storage below to allow settling. The surrounding
hillside erosion will be graded, matted, and planted. Downstream of this repair, T1-1 will be enhanced by
raising the channel in the locations where it has incised. Benching and a cascade structure, with
alternating riffle and pool bed morphology, will be used for the intermittent portion of T1-1. Existing trash
will be removed from the stream as well.
The upper Enhancement II reach of T1 will largely maintain the existing form through the riparian wetland
for the first 100 If of the stream; exclusion of livestock and removal of invasive vegetation will allow this
area to improve through more passive means. As T1 nears the confluence with T1-1, the channel becomes
more incised, and bank grading will be used to remove a large spoil berm and develop a connected
floodprone feature between the two streams. Following the confluence, T1 will be improved with
Enhancement I, which will develop a new cross-section with a bankfull bench. Profile work will focus on
arresting headcuts and defining bed features with rock and wood structures in the channel. The lower
Enhancement II reach of T1 begins as the banks become consistently lower and headcuts are less frequent
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
22

approximately 300 If upstream of the confluence with Cooks Creek. The in -channel work for this reach will
focus on stabilizing isolated eroding banks and one large headcut. Excluding livestock, treating invasive
vegetation, and removing a substantial amount of trash, tires, and debris from the stream will also
improve T1.
6.3 T2-1 and T2-2
The southern portion of the site contains T2-1 and T2-2, which then join to form T2. T2-1 will be improved
with Enhancement II at the top of the stream (Stations 200+00 to 201+36) and then restored for the
remainder (Stations 201+36 to 203+50) for a total of 268 SMCs. T2-1 starts as it forms from upslope
drainage paths joining together at the base of the slope. A 2 -foot headcut just upstream of the start of
the channel will be stabilized with Class A/B stone, and the incoming swale will be graded and matted to
create a stable entry point further downstream into T2-1 to reduce a source of slope and bank erosion. A
1 -foot headcut will be arrested using a riffle grade control structure. The restoration reach of T2-1 will
focus on repairing two 3 -foot headcuts currently impacting the stream; these areas will be restored using
cascade structures that will allow for a gradual drop in elevation with alternating riffle -pool bed
morphology over a longer section of stream. The cascade structures will also allow for more existing bank
features (most importantly mature trees) to be maintained within the reach. The mitigation along T2-1
will also include riparian vegetation plantings and livestock exclusion.
T2-2 also forms from a convergence of hillside drainage swales and will be restored for 287 SMCs (Stations
250+00 to 252+87). Upslope of the start of the project channel, the incoming swales will be stabilized
through grading to reroute flow into T2-2, which will reduce the sediment entering the stream and bank
erosion in that location. A cascade structure will be installed at the existing headcut at the start, and then
the channel will be realigned to the north of the existing alignment. Additional cascade and step pool
structures will be installed along the rest of the reach. T2-2 will come back along the existing planform as
it nears the confluence with T2-1. Livestock exclusion will also benefit this stream.
6.4 T2
T2 begins after the confluence of T2-1 and T2-2 and will produce 1,749 SMCs from restoration (Stations
203+50 to 220+99). The valley type changes at the start of T2 to a partly confined to unconfined system
in a broader stream valley. Pocket wetlands are found along the upper and middle sections of T2. The
proposed stream has been realigned throughout the valley using Priority 1 approach, which will increase
the hydroperiod of the existing wetlands. Three separate design cross-sectional dimensions are proposed
for this reach to accommodate changes in drainage area as the stream progresses down the valley (cross-
sections A, B, and C as shown in Section 12.1). Cascade and step pool structures will be used throughout
T2 to manage grade changes and to create habitat variability that is currently missing from the current
system. The breached crossing will be eliminated, and the old pond berm that runs across the channel
approximately halfway down T2 will be removed, so that the floodplain will be connected across the entire
valley. In addition, incoming swale drainage will be connected to T2 with stabilized rock outlets to
effectively manage upslope runoff. Invasive trees and shrubs will be treated, and the riparian zone will be
replanted with native species.
6.5 Ancillary Riparian Wetland Uplift
There are existing riparian wetlands (0.71 ac) within the project easement. While no mitigation credit is
being sought for the wetlands, they will still be an integral part of the site restoration. For the three
wetlands on the southern portion of the site (Wetlands A, B, and C, totaling 0.68 ac), they will benefit
from an increased groundwater hydroperiod and replanted vegetative community. T2 will be the main
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
23

hydrologic source to the riparian components of the wetland system, augmented by hillside seepage from
the adjacent uplands. The remaining wetland on the northern side of the project (Wetland D, 0.03 ac),
will also benefit from replanting and exclusion of livestock.
6.6 Crossings
There are no crossings or easements exceptions within this project.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
24
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

6.7 Design Discharge Determination
KCI developed the design discharge values for the proposed streams by using three stable reference cross-
sections located on-site (Cooks Creek Reference XS A, T2 Reference XS A and XS B) (see Section 12.2 for
locations and cross-sectional data). In comparison to other impaired portions of the site, these three
reference cross-sections had stable bankfull features that allowed for the cross-sectional area and
discharge to be linked to the drainage area. Based on these values, we developed a local regional curve
using these cross-sections. The rural Mountain regional curves and equations were used as a comparison
for the on-site relationships (Harman et al 2000) (although the site is in the Piedmont, the Mountain curve
was deemed more suitable based on the site's characteristics). The local curve showed a linear power
relationship similar to that for the Mountain curve, but for smaller drainage area sizes.
Figure 8. Local Regional Curve Comparison
Table 5. Local Regional Curve Data
Drainage
Reference
XS Area Estimate (sf)
Q (cfs) from
Q (cfs)
Cross -Section Location
Area (Sq.
XS Area
from Mountain Rural
1000
Mountain Rural
from Ref XS
Regional Curve
Miles)
•
y = 100.64x1.71
Regional Curve
Cooks Creek Reference XS A
0.051
2.90
2.86
• •
10.5
W
ao
0.034
2.00
2.18
M
100
7.8
T2 Reference XS B
0.070
0
3.54
13.3
13.3
KCI Curve
Y = 118.32X0.793
R = 0.8559
10
1
0.01
0.10
1.00 10.00
100.00
Drainage Area (Square Miles)
Figure 8. Local Regional Curve Comparison
Table 5. Local Regional Curve Data
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
25
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
Drainage
Reference
XS Area Estimate (sf)
Q (cfs) from
Q (cfs)
Cross -Section Location
Area (Sq.
XS Area
from Mountain Rural
Mountain Rural
from Ref XS
Miles)
(sf)
Regional Curve
Regional Curve
Cooks Creek Reference XS A
0.051
2.90
2.86
12.8
10.5
T2 Reference XS A
0.034
2.00
2.18
7.7
7.8
T2 Reference XS B
0.070
2.90
3.54
13.3
13.3
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
25
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

To further evaluate the field measurements taken within the project, we compared the flow results for
the three reference cross-sections to two different hydrologic methods. First, we compared our results to
the 2 -year recurrence interval flow calculations using the USGS Rural Peak -Flow Regression Equations for
North Carolina in the USGS National Streamflow Statistics Program. Bankfull values in the North Carolina
Rural Mountain area have a mean recurrence interval of 1.3 years (Harman et al. 2000), and as such should
be lower than the 2 -year recurrence interval USGS values. Our field results are lower than the USGS values
as expected. The effective discharge equation for a 1.5 -year recurrence interval for the Blue Ridge
Ecoregion (Simon et al. 2004) was also used as a comparison tool. This comparison shows that our field
calculations are within the range of other established discharge estimates. In addition to the field -acquired
reference data, we also used common reference values from Harman et al. 2011 as mentioned previously.
Table 6. Local XS Flow Compared to USGS Regression for North Carolina
1. Calculated using field bankfull dimensions and Manning's formula.
2. Calculated using USGS NSS, North Carolina Region 1 Equations assuming impervious percentage of 5%; recommended minimum range
for equation is 0.1 square mile — results shown for approximate range only.
3. Simon et al. 2004 equation for Blue Ridge (Ecoregion 66) for 1.5 Recurrence Interval.
6.8 Sediment
The on-site streams are predominantly gravel with inclusions of small cobble. Gravel and cobble layers
are evident in exposed banks and are one route that material is entering the system. Silt and sand are
present in areas where livestock impacts and bank erosion are occurring more frequently. The sediment
quantity contributed from the small project drainage areas is estimated to be supply -limited, except in
areas of active slope erosion. Once the site is restored, the upper reaches of T1, T1-1, T2-1, and T2-2 are
expected to function as threshold channels whereas T2 is anticipated to be an active gravel bed fluvial
system. Cooks Creek will have an active bed, but with a lower supply than T2. Native sediment harvested
from the site will be replaced in the restored streams as much as possible.
In order to analyze the existing sediment conditions within the project streams, two pavement samples
and thirteen pebble counts were performed for trend analysis. These data are provided in Section 12.2.
Based on the existing conditions data, the median sediment size (D50) found in the project streams ranges
from medium to very coarse gravel. T2-2 and one cross-section along T2 did have D50 values in the sand
range due to localized bank erosion. Eight of the thirteen pebble counts had D84 values in the small cobble
range or larger.
Based on the collected sediment and cross-section data, shear stress values were calculated using both
average channel boundary shear stress and a modified critical shear stress (USDA, Forest Service 2008).
The modified shear stress was calculated using the D84 values from field samples and compared to the
average channel boundary shear stress based on the existing and proposed channel dimensions and
slopes. The results are shown in the table below.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
26
Drainage
USGS
Field Q
Field
r ence
1.5 Recurrence
Cross -Section Location
Area (S) .
(cfs
Regression 2
Interval
Miles
year Q (cfs
Cooks Creek Reference
0.051
12.8
23.1
15.9
XS A
T2 Reference XS A
0.034
7.7
1 17.4
12.0
T2 Reference XS B
0.070
13.3
28.8
19.9
1. Calculated using field bankfull dimensions and Manning's formula.
2. Calculated using USGS NSS, North Carolina Region 1 Equations assuming impervious percentage of 5%; recommended minimum range
for equation is 0.1 square mile — results shown for approximate range only.
3. Simon et al. 2004 equation for Blue Ridge (Ecoregion 66) for 1.5 Recurrence Interval.
6.8 Sediment
The on-site streams are predominantly gravel with inclusions of small cobble. Gravel and cobble layers
are evident in exposed banks and are one route that material is entering the system. Silt and sand are
present in areas where livestock impacts and bank erosion are occurring more frequently. The sediment
quantity contributed from the small project drainage areas is estimated to be supply -limited, except in
areas of active slope erosion. Once the site is restored, the upper reaches of T1, T1-1, T2-1, and T2-2 are
expected to function as threshold channels whereas T2 is anticipated to be an active gravel bed fluvial
system. Cooks Creek will have an active bed, but with a lower supply than T2. Native sediment harvested
from the site will be replaced in the restored streams as much as possible.
In order to analyze the existing sediment conditions within the project streams, two pavement samples
and thirteen pebble counts were performed for trend analysis. These data are provided in Section 12.2.
Based on the existing conditions data, the median sediment size (D50) found in the project streams ranges
from medium to very coarse gravel. T2-2 and one cross-section along T2 did have D50 values in the sand
range due to localized bank erosion. Eight of the thirteen pebble counts had D84 values in the small cobble
range or larger.
Based on the collected sediment and cross-section data, shear stress values were calculated using both
average channel boundary shear stress and a modified critical shear stress (USDA, Forest Service 2008).
The modified shear stress was calculated using the D84 values from field samples and compared to the
average channel boundary shear stress based on the existing and proposed channel dimensions and
slopes. The results are shown in the table below.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
26

Table 7. Sediment Summary for Proiect Reaches
The calculations shows that Cooks Creek and T2 will both have adequate stream power to transport the
existing D84 material as shown by the critical shear stress values. T1 and T1-1 will experience a higher
average shear stress than the existing material in place. Stone reinforcement will be used to protect the
newly constructed riffles in T1 and T1-1 from excessive scour. Proposed riffle and cascade structures have
been designed with a mix of Class A, B, and natural stone; Class A (the smallest among Classes A and B)
has a modified critical shear stress that is large enough to withstand all of the predicted average channel
boundary stresses. The last column in the table above provides a predicted grain size that will move at the
calculated modified critical shear stress for the proposed channel. Given the mix of the constructed riffle,
106 mm equates to the midrange of the Class A Stone (approximately 4 in.). It can be expected that
approximately 85% of the constructed riffle stone will be greater than this diameter. Additionally, our
experience has revealed minimal movement of constructed riffle material when it is well mixed and placed
in the stream bed in similar design conditions.
Draft Mitigation Plan -12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
27
Modif.
Critical
Predicted Grain
Avg Shear
DSO
D84
Sample
Type
XS
Reach
Shear
Size Movement
Stress (Ib/sf)
(mm)
(mm)
Type
Stress
(mm)
(Ib/sf)
Cooks Creek
Cooks
Existing
0.92
40
130
PC
0.96
Ref XSA
Creek
Cooks Creek
Cooks
Existing
0.63
27
94
PC
0.62
XSA
Creek
Cooks Creek
Cooks
Existing
0.77
22
72
PC
0.50
XSB
Creek
Cooks Creek
Cooks
Existing
0.77
8.4
23.6
Pavement
0.17
(Pavement)
Creek
Existing
T1 XSA
T1
1.03
8.6
28
PC
0.18
Existing
T1 XSB
T1
1.31
25
80
PC
0.56
Existing
T2-1 XSA
T2-1
1.02
59
130
PC
1.26
Existing
T2-2 XSA
T2-2
0.88
0.2
0.5
PC
0.0004
Existing
T2 Ref XSA
T2
0.77
8.4
25
PC
0.17
Existing
T2 XSA
T2
0.88
20
93
PC
0.50
Existing
T2 Ref XSB
T2
0.96
12
57
PC
0.28
Existing
T2 XSB
T2
0.79
0.6
9.3
PC
0.02
Existing
T2 XSC
T2
1.04
21
120
PC
0.56
Existing
T2
1.04
17
45
Pavement
0.35
(pavement)
Existing
T2 XSD
T2
0.96
27
77
PC
0.58
Cooks Creek
Cooks
Proposed
Start to ConfI
0.81
40
130
PC
0.96
63
Creek
T1
Cooks Creek
Cooks
Proposed
0.87
22
72
PC
0.50
67
Confl T1 to End
Creek
Proposed
T1
T1
0.97
8.6
28
PC
0.18
75
Proposed
T1-1
T1-1
1.19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
94
Proposed
T2-1
T2-1
0.96
59
130
PC
1.26
75
Proposed
T2-2
T2-2
0.66
0.21
0.54
PC
0.004
50
Proposed
T2 Upper
T2
0.65
8.4
25
PC
0.17
49
Proposed
T2 Middle
T2
0.83
12
57
PC
0.28
65
Proposed
T2 Lower
T2
1.15
27
77
PC
0.59
90
The calculations shows that Cooks Creek and T2 will both have adequate stream power to transport the
existing D84 material as shown by the critical shear stress values. T1 and T1-1 will experience a higher
average shear stress than the existing material in place. Stone reinforcement will be used to protect the
newly constructed riffles in T1 and T1-1 from excessive scour. Proposed riffle and cascade structures have
been designed with a mix of Class A, B, and natural stone; Class A (the smallest among Classes A and B)
has a modified critical shear stress that is large enough to withstand all of the predicted average channel
boundary stresses. The last column in the table above provides a predicted grain size that will move at the
calculated modified critical shear stress for the proposed channel. Given the mix of the constructed riffle,
106 mm equates to the midrange of the Class A Stone (approximately 4 in.). It can be expected that
approximately 85% of the constructed riffle stone will be greater than this diameter. Additionally, our
experience has revealed minimal movement of constructed riffle material when it is well mixed and placed
in the stream bed in similar design conditions.
Draft Mitigation Plan -12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
27

6.9 Planting
All unforested portions of the project easement will be planted to establish a forested riparian buffer. An
estimated 12.0 acres will be reforested, but additional plantings maytake place beyond this area to ensure
an adequate density across the site. The planting plan is shown in the attached project plan sheets (Section
12.1). Trees and shrubs will be planted at a density of 968 stems per acre (9 feet x 5 feet spacing) to
achieve a mature survivability of 210 stems per acre after seven years. Woody vegetation planting will be
conducted during dormancy. Species to be planted may consist of the following and any substitutions
from the planting plan will be taken from this list:
Common Name
Tag Alder
River Birch
Green Ash
American Sycamore
Zone 1
Scientific Name
Alnus serrulata
Betula nigra
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Platanus occidentalis
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii
Willow Oak Quercus phellos
Zone 2
Common Name
Scientific Name
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
White Oak
Quercus alba
Southern Red Oak
Quercus falcata
Pin Oak
Quercus palustris
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
Wetland Status (Eastern
Mts & Piedmont)
OBL
FACW
FACW
FACW
FACW
FAC
Wetland Status (Eastern
Mts & Piedmont)
FACW
FACW
FACU
FACU
FACW
FAC
On the restored stream banks, live stakes will be used to provide natural stabilization. Species identified
for live staking include:
Common Name
Scientific Name
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
Black Willow
Salix nigra
Silky Willow
Salix sericea
A custom herbaceous seed mix composed of native species will also be developed and used to further
stabilize the easement area as needed.
6.10 Project Assets
The tables below outline the anticipated project assets that will be produced from the HSSMB project and
the stream mitigation types are shown in Figure 9. The final Stream Mitigation Credit (SMC) total includes
additional credits generated from USACE Wilmington District's Stream Buffer Credit Calculator (January
2018), an addition of 300 SMCs. The detailed results from the buffer analysis are included in Section
12.2.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
28

Table 8. Project Asset Table
Project
Existing
Restoration
Creditable
Approach
Increase/Decrease
Component
Proposed
Restoration
Mitigation
Mitigation
Footage/
Footage
Footage or
Priority
Due to Stream Buffer
-or-
Stationing
Level
Ratio (X to 1)
Credits
Acreage
or Acreage
Acreage
Level
Credit Calculator
Reach ID
Cooks Creek
460
10+00 to
460
460
EI
N/A
1.5 to 1
307
14+60
Cooks Creek
265
14+60 to
258
258
Ell
N/A
2.5 to 1
103
17+18
176
20+00 to
176
176
Ell
N/A
2.5 to 1
70
21+76
T1
349
21+76 to
349
349
EI
N/A
1.5 to 1
233
25+25
320
25+25 to
320
320
Ell
N/A
2.5 to 1
128
28+45
T1-1
141
3 0+00 to
0+00 t
141
141
EI
N/A
1.5 to 1
94
300
31+41
136
200+00 to
136
136
Ell
N/A
2.5 to 1
54
201+36
T2-1
201+36 to
214
214
214
R
PH
1 to 1
214
203+50
T2-2
308
250+00 to
287
287
R
PI/PII
1 to 1
287
252+87
203+50 to
T2
2,025
1,749
1,749
R
PI
1 to 1
1,749
220+99
Total Stream Mitigation Credits (SMCs)
3,239
3,539
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
29
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Table 9. Length and Summations by Mitigation Category
Table 10. Overall Assets Summary
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
Overall Assets Summary
Asset Category
Non -riparian
Stream
3,539
(includes additional 300 SMCs from Stream Buffer Credit
Calculator)
Stream
Riparian Wetland
NR Wetland
Restoration Level
Wetland
Buffer (square feet)
(linear feet)
(acres)
(acres)
Non-
Riverine
Riverine
Restoration
2,250
Enhancement
Enhancement 1
950
Enhancement II
890
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Preservation
Table 10. Overall Assets Summary
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
Overall Assets Summary
Asset Category
Overall Credits
Stream
3,539
(includes additional 300 SMCs from Stream Buffer Credit
Calculator)
RP Wetland
NR Wetland
Buffer
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
30
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Extent of Project Parcels'"''. -
Proposed Easement (12.4 ac)
Off -Site Streams "
Proposed Mitigation - 3,539 SMC*
Restoration (2,2501f / 2,250 SMC) ,
Enhancement 1 (950 If / 633 SMC)
t
Enhancement 2 (890 If / 356 SMC) • .y C
* Includes an additional 300 SMCs N
based on buffer analysis tool
^. ♦ ♦ t
41,
FIGURE 9. PROJECT ASSET MAP AN
0 150 300 HAIR SHEEP STREAM MITIGATION BANK ,\ Source: NC Statewide
Feet SURRY COUNTY, NC �\\` Orthoimagery, 2014.
31

7.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Monitoring of the site shall occur for a minimum of seven years following construction. The following
performance standards for stream mitigation are based on the Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update (NCIRT 2016) and will be used to judge site success.
Vegetation Performance
The site must achieve a woody stem density of 260 stems/acre after five years and 210 stems/acre after
seven years to be considered successful. Trees in each plot must average 6 feet in height at Year 5 and 8
feet at Year 7. A single species may not account for more than 50% of the required number of stems within
any plot. Volunteers must be present for a minimum of two growing seasons before being included in
performance standards in Year 5 and Year 7. If monitoring indicates that any of these standards are not
being met, corrective actions will take place.
Stream Hydrologic Performance
During the monitoring period, a minimum of four bankfull events must be recorded. These bankfull events
must occur in separate monitoring years. Bankfull events will be verified using a minimum of one
automatic stream monitoring gauge on Tributary 2 to record daily stream depth readings. The project
streams must also show a minimum of 30 continuous flow days within a calendar year (assuming normal
precipitation). A "normal" year will be based on NRCS climatological data for Surry County with the 30th
to 70th percentile thresholds as the range of normal, as documented in the USACE Technical Report
"Accessing and Using Meteorological Data to Evaluate Wetland Hydrology, April 2000."
Stream Geomorphology Performance
The site's geomorphology for all reaches will be monitored per the NCIRT 2016 monitoring guidelines. The
bank height ratio (BHR) should not exceed 1.2 and the entrenchment ratio (ER) must not fall below 2.2 for
C and E channels. BHR and ER at any measured riffle cross-section should not change by more than 10%
from the baseline condition during any given monitoring interval (e.g., no more than 10% between years
1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3 and 5, or 5 and 7). There will be an overall assessment for each reach to distinguish
localized versus systemic concerns for that stream. Adjustment and lateral movement following
construction and as the channel settles over the monitoring period are to be expected. Geomorphological
measurements of cross-sections will be used to determine if any adjustments that occur are out of the
range typically expected for this type of stream.
8.0 MONITORING PLAN
Monitoring of the HSSMB shall consist of the collection and analysis of stream hydrology, stability, and
vegetation survivability data to support the evaluation of the project in meeting established performance
standards described above. The Proposed Monitoring Plan in Figure 10 shows the proposed locations of
monitoring features described below.
Vegetation Monitoring
Vegetation monitoring will take place between July 1st and leaf drop. The success of the riparian buffer
plantings will be evaluated using thirteen 0.02 -acre square or rectangular plots within the planted stream
buffer. Seven plots will be permanently installed, while the remainder will be randomly placed at the time
of each monitoring visit. Vegetation must be planted and plots established at least 180 days prior to the
start of the first year of monitoring.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
32

In the permanent plots, the plant's height, species, location, and origin (planted versus volunteer) will be
noted. In the random plots, species and height will be recorded. In all plots, invasive stems will also be
recorded to determine the percentage of invasive stems present. Additionally, a photograph will be taken
of each plot. Beginning at the end of the first growing season, the site's vegetation will be monitored in
years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.
Stream Hydrologic Monitoring
Bankfull events on-site will be verified using one automatic stream monitoring gauge on T2. Additional
gauges and/or recording devices such as cameras (set to record a photo or video a minimum of once per
day) will be installed on the intermittent reaches of T1, T1-1, and T2-1 to document the presence of flow.
Stream Geomorphology Monitoring
For stream monitoring, the purpose of monitoring is to evaluate the stability of the restored stream.
Following the procedures established in the USDA Forest Service Manual, Stream Channel Reference Sites
(Harrelson et al. 1994) and the methodologies utilized in the Rosgen stream assessment and classification
system (1994 and 1996), data collected will consist of detailed dimension measurements, longitudinal
profiles, and bed materials sampling.
Mmoncinn
Ten permanent cross-sections will be established at the HSSMB, one set of a riffle and pool each on Cooks
Creek and T1, and three sets on T2, the longest of the project reaches. The extents of each cross-section
will be recorded by either conventional survey or GPS. The cross-sectional surveys shall provide a detailed
measurement of the stream and banks and will include points on the adjacent floodplain or valley, at the
top of bank, bankfull, at all breaks in slope, the edge of water, and thalweg. Width/depth, bank height
and entrenchment ratios, as well as bankfull cross-sectional area, width, max depth and mean depth will
be calculated for each riffle cross-section based on the survey data. The BHR will be measured by using a
constant bankfull area over the monitoring period and adjusting the bankfull elevation each monitoring
event based on how this area fits in the cross-sectional data. The revised bankfull elevation will then be
used to calculate BHR along with the current low bank height. Width/depth ratios, bankfull cross-sectional
area, width, max depth and mean depth will be calculated for each pool cross-section. Cross-section
measurements will take place in Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.
Profile
A detailed longitudinal profile will be conducted along the Restoration and Enhancement I portions of the
project streams during the as -built survey. Measurements will include slopes (average, pool, and riffle) as
well as calculations of pool -to -pool spacing. No additional profile measurements will be taken during the
monitoring period unless deemed necessary due to concerns about bed elevation adjustments.
Visual Assessment
An annual site walk will be conducted at the end of each monitoring period to document any problem
areas. Specific problem areas that could arise include excessive bank erosion, bed deposition or
aggradation, problems with the installed structures, or sparse vegetative cover. The findings of the visual
assessment as well as any recommended corrective actions for problem areas will be summarized in the
monitoring reports by way of a Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) figure.
Photograph reference points (PRPs) will be established to assist in characterizing the site and to allow
qualitative evaluation of the site conditions. The location of each photo point will be marked in the
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
33

monitoring plan and the bearing/orientation of the photograph will be documented to allow for repeated
use.
Reporting
The monitoring report shall provide a project data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of
project status and trends and assist in decision making regarding project close-out. The report will
document the monitored components and include all collected data, analyses, and photographs. The first
scheduled monitoring will be conducted during the first full growing season following project completion.
The site will be monitored for performance standards for seven years as needed after completion of
construction. Full monitoring reports will be completed in Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Limited monitoring
reports will be submitted in Years 4 and 6 (CCPV, photos, stream gauge data, and site narrative).
Table 11. Monitoring Requirements
Hair Sheep Stream Restoration Site
Required
Parameter
Quantity
Frequency
Notes
Pattern and
Restoration and
Once, during as-
Additional measurements in later years
Yes
Profile
Enhancement I reaches
built survey
may be taken as necessary.
Stream
10 cross-sections
Monitoring Years
Yes
Dimension
(5 riffles, 5 pools)
1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
1 pressure transducer gauge
Yes
Stream
on T2, plus 3 other gauges
Annual
Hydrology
or cameras on T1, T1-1, and
T2-1.
7 permanent and 6 random
Monitoring Years
Yes
Vegetation
Minimum size of 0.02 acre
vegetation monitoring plots
1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
Visual
Yes
Annual
Assessment
Exotic and
Locations of exotic and nuisance
Yes
nuisance
Annual
vegetation will be mapped
vegetation
Project
Locations of vegetation damage, boundary
Yes
boundary
Semi-annual
encroachments, etc. will be mapped
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
34
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

9.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
In the event the mitigation site or a specific component of the mitigation site fails to achieve the necessary
performance standards as specified in the mitigation plan, KCI shall notify the members of the IRT and
work with the IRT to develop contingency plans and remedial actions.
10.0 LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
KCI will institute a long-term management plan to assess the on-going condition and implement any
maintenance provisions to maintain performance of the site. The conservation easements will ensure that
only IRT -allowable activities take place.
To monitor the project's continued success, the long-term management plan will be implemented
following the completed monitoring period. All components of the mitigation bank will be inspected
annually or less frequently as needed to ensure that the terms of the easement are met in perpetuity. All
reporting will be documented and kept on file for future reference.
This easement will be held by the Atlantic Coast Conservancy (ACC). The ACC shall be responsible for
periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are
upheld. Appropriate endowment funds required to uphold easement terms will be determined prior to
easement execution. Additional information on the Long Term Management Fund can be found in
Appendix 12.5.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
36

11.0 REFERENCES
Center for Watershed Protection. 2003. Impacts of Impervious Cover on Aquatic Systems: Watershed
Protection Research Monograph. Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, MD. Pages 1-158
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report
Y-87-1. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Griffith, G., J. Omernik, and J. Comstock. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina, Regional Descriptions. US
E.P.A. Last accessed 8/2017 at:
https:Harchive.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/web/html/ncsc—eco.html
Harman, W.H. et al. 2000. Bankfull Regional Curves for North Carolina Mountain Streams. In: Kane, D.L.
(Ed.). Proc. AWRA Conf. Water Resources in Extreme Environments, Anchorage, AK. Pp. 185-190.
Harman, W. and R. Starr. 2011. Natural Channel Design Review Checklist. US Fish and Wildlife Service,
Chesapeake Bay Field Office, Annapolis, MD and US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Wetlands Division. Washington, D.C. EPA 843-B-12-005
Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function -Based
Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
NCDEQ, Division of Water Resources. Draft 2018 303(d) list. Raleigh, NC. Last accessed at:
https:Hfiles.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water/20Quality/Planning/TMDL/303d/2018/2018-DRAFT-NC-303-
d--ListwCover.pdf
North Carolina Interagency Review Team. 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory
Mitigation Update. Last accessed at: http://saw-reg.usace.army.miI/PN/2016/Wilmington-District-
Mitigation-Update.pdf
Shields, Ing. A., W. P. Ott, and J. C. Van Uchelen. 1936. Application of Similarity Principles and Turbulence
Research to Bed -load Movement. Pasadena, CA: Soil Conservation Service, California Institute of
Technology
Simon, A., W. Dickerson, and A. Heins. 2004. Suspended -sediment transport rates at the 1.5 -year
recurrence interval for ecoregions of the United States: transport conditions at the bankfull and
effective discharge? Geomorphology 58: 243-262.
Simon, A. and M. Rinaldi. 2006. Disturbance, stream incision, and channel evolution: The roles of excess
transport capacity and boundary materials in controlling channel response. Geomorphology 79:
361-383.
Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003, US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
37
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

USDA, Forest Service, National Technology and Development Program. 2008. Stream Simulation: An
Ecological Approach to Providing Passage for Aquatic Organisms at Road -Stream Crossings.
Appendix E: Methods for Streambed Mobility/Stability Analysis. Last accessed 9/2016 at:
http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/pubs/pdf/StreamSimulation/
USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2018. Web Soil Survey. Last accessed at:
http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
USGS. 2018. Alligator Back Formation; Gneiss. Last accessed at:
https:Hmrdata.usgs.gov/geology/state/sgmc-unit.php?unit=NCZabg%3B2
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018
KN
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

12.0 APPENDICES
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

12.1 Plan Sheets
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

PINE
PROJECT —
ENTRANCES
0
N I
K
m
W
EXIT
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCAB
PROJECT COMPONENTS
BEGIN
TRIBUTARY
HAIR SHEEP STREAM
MITIGATION BAND
SURRY COUNTY, NORTH
END /
TRIBUTARY
KCI PROJECT NUMBER
SXEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
o�0
161J061)0
161706170
�
��
O
to 220+99
2,025
Restoration
1 to 1
1,749
1,749
TOTAL STREAM CREDITS
3,239
300
3,539
GRAPHIC SCALES
—200' 0 200' 400'
I�Irr
TITLE SHEET
—40' 0 40' 80'
PLAN SHEETS
DIRECTIONS TO SITE
From Raleigh, take 40 West to Winston—Salem.
Take 52 North towards Mt. Airy
. Take I-74 West
to Exit 8 and take a right onto Red Brush Road.
Take a left onto Pine Ridge Road. Take a left
onto Haystack Rd. The site entrances will be on
each side of I-74.
INDEX OF SHEETS
1 TITLE SHEET
2 GENERAL NOTES &PROJECT LEGEND
34
CAROLINA
/
BEGIN
BEGIN
TRIBUTARY 2-2
Existing Restoration Increase/Decrease Updated Credits
Reach ID
Proposed Footage or Approach Mitigation Footage or Mitigation Due to Stream Based on Stream
Stationing Ratio Credits Buffer Credit Buffer Credit
Square Feet Area Calculator Calculator
10+00 to 14+60 460 Enhancement 11.5 to 1 460 307
CC
14+60 to 17+18 265 Enhancement II 2.5 to 1 258 103
T1-1 30+00 to 31+41 141 Enhancement I 1.5 to 1 141 94
20+00 to 21+76 176 Enhancement II 2.5 to 1 176 70
Tl 21+76 to 25+25 349 Enhancement I 1.5 to 1 349 233
300
25+25 to 28+45 320 Enhancement II 2.5 to 1 320 128
200+00 to 201+36 136 Enhancement II 2.5 to 1 136 54
T2-1
201+36 to 203+50 214 Restoration 1 to 1 214 214
T2-2 250+00 to 252+87 308 Restoration 1 to 1 287 287
T2 203+50
BEGIN CC
DETAILS
5 TYPICAL CROSS-SECTIONS
6-8 SITE PLAN
9-11 PROFILES
12-13 PLANTING PLAN
14-15 BOUNDARY MARKING PLAN
16-21 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE = 13.30 ACRES
Prepared In the Office of:
�� ,1SSOCfATFS OF NC
ENGINEERS- PLANNERS- ECOLOGISTS
4505 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD
SUITE 400
RALEIGH, NC 27609
Prepared by:
GARY M. MRYNC2:A, PE
PROJECT ENGINEER
ALEX FRENCH
PROJECT DESIGNER
STATE
KCI PROJECT NUMBER
SXEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
o�0
161J061)0
161706170
�
��
O
STATE
KCI PROJECT NUMBER
SXEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
o�0
161J061)0
161706170
�
��
SyFFT
6�
END CC
REVISIONS
PROJECT ENGINEER
��rl1l 11ltllltf
P.E.
S/GNATURE:

1j1{111f}I f�j'.
,••I�lr1 Coq
GENERAL NOTES:
CONTROL
POINTS
�=
DESC.
NORTHING
EASTING
ELEV.
S
BEARINGS AND DISTANCES:
KCI # 1
996840.6185
1497701.864
1314.0588
: Q : 2 •'
ALL BEARINGS ARE NAD 1983 GRID BEARINGS.
KCI # 2
996947.465
1497799.035
1309.469
s7 illi
z
ALL DISTANCES AND COORDINATES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL
KCI # 3
997099.7807
1497667.034
1322.0097
'' (��'�
N
(GROUND) VALUES.
KCI # 4
997314.7975
1497782.992
1320.4448
+�'• kAEL �t;P ���
a
KCI # 5
997121.8113
1498005.957
1307.6604
UTILITY/SUBSURFACE PLANS:
KCI # 6
996854.3771
1498060.051
1276.1238
NO SUBSURFACE PLANS ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS PROJECT.
KCI # 7
996711.0403
1497911.887
1274.5202
EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED.
KCI #108
996580.9677
1498206.658
1264.1518
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING A UTILITY
KCI # 109
996337.2598
1498424.496
1250.9876
LOCATOR AND ESTABLISHING THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND
KCI # 110
996192.1277
1498711.644
1245.8931
ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE PROJECT REACH.
KCI # 111
996002.5756
1499152.074
1261.0937
KCI # 112
995751.7325
1499203.047
1221.2888
KCI # 113
996170.7561
1499272.733
1271.1845
KCI # 114
996462.2455
1499260.551
1277.4756
KCI # 115
996668.9985
1499077.143
1296.3011
KCI # 116
996932.2099
1498612.716
1298.9863
KCI # 117
997464.6079
1497948.37
1328.3014
KCI # 118
997868.2554
1498303.915
1342.0224
g
KCI # 119
997591.6282
1498384.205
1335.5653
KCI # 120
997220.7052
1498819.199
1308.4439
M"4 LL W
0Q
KCI # 121
997041.4644
1499083.208
1291.2554
2
a?
0
KCI # 122
997258.3504
1498833.458
1306.4684
W�
KCI # 123
997660.8827
1498444.258
1332.621
a z
co
KCI # 124
997930.0743
1498305.709
1343.4811
o
Zz
1
KCI # 125
997546.5426
1497746.619
1344.4177
0_
J
z
I Q
W
V
PROJECT LEGEND:
0 0
0 0
N
Y
Proposed Thalweg
z
w/Approximate Bankfull Limits
Minor Contour Line
____________________________________
m
Major Contour Line
____________________________________
p z
Proposed Riffle Enhancement _______________
o
U
Proposed Riffle Grade Control
Proposed Cascade Structure .................
Q Z
w �
z
Proposed Step Pool
o
Proposed Live Lift ---------------------------------
w
Cn
Proposed Bench Grading ....................
Q
Existing Channel to be Filled ................
Proposed Channel Block----------- 4w
onre: DECEMBER 2018
SCALE: NTS
GENERAL
NOTES &
PROJECT
LEGEND
SHEET 2 OF
21

USE BURLAP BACKED HEAVY COIR
MATTING ON ALL LIFTS. BACKFILL
WITH SUITABLE GROWING MATERIAL.
NOTES
USE STONE BASE FOR LIVE LIFTS LOCATED AT
STATIONS 210+50, 216+60 AND 220+65. ALL OTHER
LOCATIONS CAN SUBSTITUTE STONE BASE WITH
100% WOODY DEBRIS.
USE 1.5'x1"x2" WOODEN STAKES ON 1' CENTERS.
STAKES SHALL HAVE A'ROOFING' NAIL AT TOP
TO KEEP FABRIC FROM SLIPPING OFF.
LAY FILTER FABRIC OVER UPSTREAM
TOP EDGE OF SILL ROCK(S); BEHIND
FILTER FABRIC, BACKFILL WITH #57 SEE PROFILE SHEETS FOR -
STONE, CLASS A OR B STONE AND/OR STATIONS AND ELEVATIONS
NATURAL STREAM MATERIALS.
PROPOSED
PROFILE
FLOW _
GRADE
FILTER - STONE,- 18" NOM. THICKNESS MIX OF:
FABRIC BOULDERS 10%CABC STONE
10% CLASS A STONE
20% CLASS B STONE
60% CLASS 1 STONE
PROFILE VIEW
NOTES:
FOR DOUBLE STEP POOLS, CONTINUE ROCK MIXTURE
FROM FIRST SILL ALL THE WAY TO THE SECOND SILL.
DO NOT STOP AT THE 6FT MINIMUM AS SHOWN IN THE
SINGLE STEP POOL PLAN VIEW.
BOULDERS SHOULD BE NATIVE STONES OR SHOT
ROCK, ANGULAR AND OBLONG, WITH AN AXIS
APPROXIMATELY &L x 2'W x 1.5'D.
BOULDER SILLS TO EXTEND V MINIMUM INTO STREAM
BANKS FOR STEP POOL STRUCTURES.
STONE INSTALLATION: START BY INSTALLING STONE
MIXTURE. THEN ADD SURGE STONE TO FILL IN VOIDS.
FINISH BY WASHING IN NATURAL STREAM MATERIAL
TO OBTAIN FINAL GRADE.
IF APPROVED BY DESIGNER, BOULDER SILLS CAN BE
REPLACED WITH LIVE HARDWOOD LOGS FOUND ON
SITE. LOGS MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 10" DIAMETER
AND STACKED IN A TRIANGLE FORMATION.
NAIL (WITH PLASTIC WASHER) FILTER FABRIC TO
THE TOP LOG AND CONTINUE DOWN AND UNDER
STRUCTURE AS SHOWN ON STEP POOL DETAIL.
FILTER FABRIC
(KEYIN UNDER
STREAM BED)
Eq ALMom =
SCALE:NTS
w Q
O
w
rn
w
? I
z z z
m m 13 m
0
W
o O
LL
INSTALL CENTER BOULDER u. J
ILLO
SLIGHTLY LOWER THAN SIDE O o O
BOULDERS TO FORCE FLOW r r
TO CENTER OF CHANNEL
I
SFT
INSTALL SILL AT 8* ANGLE MIN. 5FT
TO ENCOURAGE FLOW MIN.
AWAY FROM OUTER BANK
�O
6FT. MIN.
18" NOM. THICKNESS MIX OF: 10 (SINGLE
10% CABC STONEO/0 STEP
10%CLASS A STONE o POOLS)
20% CLASS B STONE
60% CLASS 1 STONE /
STONE TOE: /
START ROCK PFT
BELOW WATERS EDGE
AND EXTEND TO i
ABOVE WATERS EDGE EDGE
Q
Ft\FF\
PLAN VIEW
z
z
z
INSTALL LIVE WHIPS BETWEEN SOIL LIFTS
m
60% CLASSB STONE
m
WITH APPROX. 1 FOOT OF PLANT MATERIAL
(WASH IN NATURAL STONE AND
r O
p w
EXPOSED. MINIMUM LENGTH OF CUTTINGS
r O
SHALL BE 4'. DISTANCE BETWEEN CUTTINGS
SHEET FOR EXACT
6" MINIMUM
SHALL BE 4". FILL VOIDS WITH SUITABLE SOIL.
DIMENSIONS
—IIII
IIII_
4 EXPOSED
/ STONE BASE
z_
Op
BASEFLOW
po 0
°Oo
0
00-
o
o
o OOgo p i- o -
Y o 0
�_ 5' MINIMUM
PER DESIGNER'S DIRECTION,
10% CABC STONE
�1
INTERSPERSE WITH WOODY
10% CLASS A STONE
DEBRIS THAT EXTENDS INTO
20% CLASS B STONE
60% CLASS 1 STONE
SECTION A -A
POOL TO ENHANCE HABITAT.
NOTES
USE STONE BASE FOR LIVE LIFTS LOCATED AT
STATIONS 210+50, 216+60 AND 220+65. ALL OTHER
LOCATIONS CAN SUBSTITUTE STONE BASE WITH
100% WOODY DEBRIS.
USE 1.5'x1"x2" WOODEN STAKES ON 1' CENTERS.
STAKES SHALL HAVE A'ROOFING' NAIL AT TOP
TO KEEP FABRIC FROM SLIPPING OFF.
LAY FILTER FABRIC OVER UPSTREAM
TOP EDGE OF SILL ROCK(S); BEHIND
FILTER FABRIC, BACKFILL WITH #57 SEE PROFILE SHEETS FOR -
STONE, CLASS A OR B STONE AND/OR STATIONS AND ELEVATIONS
NATURAL STREAM MATERIALS.
PROPOSED
PROFILE
FLOW _
GRADE
FILTER - STONE,- 18" NOM. THICKNESS MIX OF:
FABRIC BOULDERS 10%CABC STONE
10% CLASS A STONE
20% CLASS B STONE
60% CLASS 1 STONE
PROFILE VIEW
NOTES:
FOR DOUBLE STEP POOLS, CONTINUE ROCK MIXTURE
FROM FIRST SILL ALL THE WAY TO THE SECOND SILL.
DO NOT STOP AT THE 6FT MINIMUM AS SHOWN IN THE
SINGLE STEP POOL PLAN VIEW.
BOULDERS SHOULD BE NATIVE STONES OR SHOT
ROCK, ANGULAR AND OBLONG, WITH AN AXIS
APPROXIMATELY &L x 2'W x 1.5'D.
BOULDER SILLS TO EXTEND V MINIMUM INTO STREAM
BANKS FOR STEP POOL STRUCTURES.
STONE INSTALLATION: START BY INSTALLING STONE
MIXTURE. THEN ADD SURGE STONE TO FILL IN VOIDS.
FINISH BY WASHING IN NATURAL STREAM MATERIAL
TO OBTAIN FINAL GRADE.
IF APPROVED BY DESIGNER, BOULDER SILLS CAN BE
REPLACED WITH LIVE HARDWOOD LOGS FOUND ON
SITE. LOGS MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 10" DIAMETER
AND STACKED IN A TRIANGLE FORMATION.
NAIL (WITH PLASTIC WASHER) FILTER FABRIC TO
THE TOP LOG AND CONTINUE DOWN AND UNDER
STRUCTURE AS SHOWN ON STEP POOL DETAIL.
FILTER FABRIC
(KEYIN UNDER
STREAM BED)
Eq ALMom =
SCALE:NTS
w Q
O
w
rn
w
? I
z z z
m m 13 m
0
W
o O
LL
INSTALL CENTER BOULDER u. J
ILLO
SLIGHTLY LOWER THAN SIDE O o O
BOULDERS TO FORCE FLOW r r
TO CENTER OF CHANNEL
I
SFT
INSTALL SILL AT 8* ANGLE MIN. 5FT
TO ENCOURAGE FLOW MIN.
AWAY FROM OUTER BANK
�O
6FT. MIN.
18" NOM. THICKNESS MIX OF: 10 (SINGLE
10% CABC STONEO/0 STEP
10%CLASS A STONE o POOLS)
20% CLASS B STONE
60% CLASS 1 STONE /
STONE TOE: /
START ROCK PFT
BELOW WATERS EDGE
AND EXTEND TO i
ABOVE WATERS EDGE EDGE
Q
Ft\FF\
PLAN VIEW
z
z
10% CABC STONE
30%CLASSA STONE
a m
m
60% CLASSB STONE
O w
0-0 w
(WASH IN NATURAL STONE AND
r O
m O
SOIL MATERIAL TO FILL IN VOIDS)
SEE CROSS-SECTION
SHEET FOR EXACT
6" MINIMUM
DIMENSIONS
(SEE NOTE BELOW)
SECTION
STONE INSTALLATION:
START BY INSTALLING STONE MIXTURE.
FINISH BY WASHING IN NATURAL STREAM
BED MATERIAL TO FILL IN VOIDS AND
OBTAIN FINAL GRADE.
RIFFLE ENHANCEMENT
SCALE:NTS
`
` ++Ct 111111 +.,
,1
•+H,111
CA•n7"
zv
;g
S -
0
O
amkm
Ow Ow
r O .0 SEE CROSS-SECTION SHEET
FOR EXACT DIMENSIONS
WRAP AND STAKE COIR
MATTING UNDER
1'
SEE NOTE MIN. CONSTRUCTED BANK
BELOW
2' MIN. 10% CABC STONE
30% CLASS A STONE
60% SS B STONE
SECTION (WASHLIN NATURAL STONE AND
SOIL MATERIAL TO FILL IN VOIDS)
NOTE:
PER DESIGNER'S DIRECTION,
INTERSPERSE WITH WOODY
DEBRIS TO ENHANCE HABITAT.
iw w
5 LL SEE PROFILE SHEETS FOR LL
m STATIONS AND ELEVATIONS Z �
FOR BEGIN AND END OF
RIFFLE
TAPER STONE INTO
FLOW BASEFLOW EXISTING STREAM BED
=i- - - - - - - - - - ---
PROFILE --PROFILE
STONE INSTALLATION:
START BY INSTALLING STONE MIXTURE.
FINISH BY WASHING IN NATURAL STREAM
BED MATERIAL TO FILL IN VOIDS AND
OBTAIN FINAL GRADE.
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL
SCALE:NTS
�• FI"IFl- '1�ti
��1111115151�
0
rn �
r W
E.
z Z U)N
ur a
0
ow �wv a Z 7)�1_1
Lu J Z0
a LL
0
It J (�
Lu <J
Z O
Lu v
Y
Z
Q
m
Z Q
O z
a J
V O
CG �
G O
LU
Z
w U
U
LU
LU Z:)
= <%
U)
Q
_
DETAILS

NOTES:
-MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR
TO THE INTRODUCTION OF WATER TO
A STREAM SECTION.
-MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG
BOTH SIDES OF NEW STREAM LENGTH
-MATTING SHALL EXTEND FROM TOE
OF SLOPE TO THE TOP OF BANK.
-ALL DISTURBED AREAS INSIDE FLOOD-
PLAIN EXTENTS SHALL BE SEEDED DAILY.
COIR MATTING
UNDERLAIN BY STRAW,
SEED, AND FERTILIZER
1" x 2" NOTCHED
GRADE STAKE
ANCHORING
COIR MATTING
SCALE: NTS
Wbkf
INSTALL TO ONLY HALF TYPICAL RIFFLE
BANKFULL ON INNER
BENDS OF POOLS
Wbkf
-
-- BANKFULL
— GROUND SURFACE
NOTE:
COIR MATTING SHALL BE
WATER SURFACE
INSTALLED ALONG ENTIRE
TYPICAL POOL
BANK HEIGHT FOR STEP
DESIGNED BEGIN
COIR MATTING
POOL STRUCTURES
RIFFLE ELEVATION
EXAMPLE COIR MATTING PLACEMENT
SCALE: NTS
UNCOMPACTED BACKFILL
1 MIN. COMPACTED
FINISH GRADE 6' BACKFILL
0 0 5'�tlb FLOW
COMPACTED
,BACKFILL MIN. 1.0' THICK ?S,7 27 CHANNEL
SEDIMENT CONTOL STONE
CLASSISTONE
CHANNELBLOCK
SCALE:NTS
FILTER
FABRIC
2 r 3'
�O -O
10% CABC STONE
30% CLASS A STONE
60% CLASS B STONE
STONE INSTALLATION: (WASH IN NATURAL STONE AND
START BY INSTALLING STONE MIXTURE. SOIL MATERIAL TO FILL IN VOIDS)
FINISH BY WASHING IN NATURAL STREAM
BED MATERIAL TO FILL IN VOIDS AND
OBTAIN FINAL GRADE.
STABILIZED ROCK OUTLET
SCALE: NTS
NOTES:
BERM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED USING NATIVE SOIL HARVESTED
WHILE CREATING SWALE.
BERM SHALL BE INSTALLED ON DOWNHILL PORTION OF SLOPE
TO ALLOW SWALE TO CAPTURE AND DIRECT SURFACE WATER.
ONCE GRADED, SEED AND STRAW NEWLY GRADED STRUCTURE.
BED OF NEW SWALE TO BE LINED WITH 700 GRAM COIR FIBER MATTING.
SWALE/BERM
SCALE: NTS
SEE PROFILE SHEETS FOR
STATIONS AND ELEVATIONS
FOR BEGIN AND END OF
I RIFFLE
DESIGNED END
DESIGNED BEGIN
RIFFLE ELEVATION
RIFFLE ELEVATION
(SEE PROFILE SHEETS)
(SEE PROFILE SHEETS)
CLASS 2 STONE
TAPER RIFFLE MATERIAL
BOULDER DROP CLASS 2 STONE
INTO FINAL GRADE
BOULDER DROPCLASS
2 STONE DISTRIBUTE RIFFLE GRADE
COMING OUT OF POOL
_ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
BOULDER D_RO_P_ EVENLY THROUGHOUT
DESIGNED POOL 00 cio_
OOO
FLOW -
�\
BOULDER DROPS. EXACT
NUMBER OF DROPS TO BE
ELEVATION _
en
O �O
�%
O / \ �0 �,
O O DETERMINED BY DESIGN
OOO
QO REPRESENTATIVE.
DO�0Q
O 0
O
NOTE:
PER DESIGNER'S
DIRECTION,
INTERSPERSE WITH WOODY SECTION B -B' (LONGITUDINAL VIEW)
DEBRIS TO
ENHANCE HABITAT.
DESIGNED POOL
ELEVATION
Y
0 Y
m
O
m
a0
STABILIZE BANKS
o
r O
m O WITH 700 GRAM
COIR MATTING
WRAP AND STAKE COIR
MATTING UNDER
CONSTRUCTED BANK
NOTES:
Q o_�� Qo ooOQ
WRAP AND STAKE COIR MATTING UNDER
°f°
% 9� O / O O 8
�O
CONSTRUCTED BANK THROUGHOUT ENTIRE
OO / OO
LENGTH OFF RIFFLE SECTIONS.
2' MIN
10% CABC STONE
START BY INSTALLING STONE MIXTURE.
SECTION A -A' (CROSS-SECTION VIEW)
30% CLASS A STONE
FINISH BY WASHING IN NATURAL STREAM
60% CLASS B STONE
BED MATERIAL TO FILL IN VOIDS AND
(WASH IN NATURAL STONE AND
OBTAIN FINAL GRADE.
SOIL MATERIAL TO FILL IN VOIDS)
NOTE:
SEE CROSS-SECTION SHEET FOR EXACT
PER DESIGNER'S DIRECTION,
DIMENSIONS.
INTERSPERSE WITH WOODY
DEBRIS THAT EXTENDS INTO
CLASS 2 STONE
POOL TO ENHANCE HABITAT.
F
o
'o
•o
o• �.a
- - -� o --� o — --� o --- o o -- o
'o •o •o 'o 'o
o 'o •o a
°
oo•
B
oo• °
o
ooFLOW oo oo' o oo• oo'
oa°o oo. o oo. o- oo.
0 o
oo• oo
oo FLOW oa
o
B
Q
o
• o 0
0 • o o . o • o o . o
. o • o
�
•o•,
•o °
o•° ° 'o ° o•, ° o•o ° •o'e o
o•o o'o •o•°
°go• o0
0 00 °go• oo g oo °So•
°go• oo °go
BOTTOM OF BANK
o
—_—_—
TOP OF BANK
(BANKFULL)
-
I
A VARIES
-
PLAN VIEW
CASCADE STRUCTURE
SCALE:NTS
DETAILS
0
vm
W.0
H
� N
V) Q
Q J
00
K0
tqW U _
Lr
W�
z0
O?_
U)
aw
LL
0
N
V

REACH: CC-xsA - STATION 10+00 TO 16+28
"C4" STREAM TYPE
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR BANK GRADING
LOCATIONS
6.2'
1.8' 1.3'. 1.3', 1.8' J
-t- -1--
o - --1c
bo
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 = THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR BANK GRADING
LOCATIONS
8.6' 1
1
• `25. I I 5.5' 3.1' 1 1
` 1
TYPICAL POOL - RIGHT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR BANK GRADING
LOCATIONS
8.6
I I 1
`25 1 1 3.1' 5.5' 1 1
I1.5'I
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
REACH : T1-1 - STATION 30+00 TO 31+41
REACH: T2-1 - STATION 200+00 TO 205+50
r'C4'r STREAM TYPE
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN
EXTENTS
I t---I-I-I-_-I
+i J.
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 =THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN
EXTENTS
5.6'
3.6' 2'
X25; � 25i1�•
11' I
r~
TYPICAL POOL RIGHT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN
EXTENTS
5.6'
2' 3.6'
• \25:1 �� 2�, ,
tH
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
REACH: CC-xsB - STATION 16+28 TO 17+18
"C4" STREAM TYPE
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR BANK GRADING
LOCATIONS
1
X25;� 1.9'1 1.5' � 151.9' J
I 25i1i'
G
co
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 =THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR BANK GRADING
LOCATIONS
25 1 1 6.1' 3.4' 1 1�
1 I 1 25i
I^-1
TYPICAL POOL - RIGHT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR BANK GRADING
LOCATIONS
9.5'
1 T 1
I I 3.4' 6.1' I
11.9'1
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
REACH: T1 - STATION 20+00 TO 28+45
REACH: T2-xsA - STATION 203+50 TO 207+85
r'C4'r STREAM TYPE
SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR
BANK GRADING LOCATIONS
& FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
5.4'
1.5'1.21.2', 1.5'
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 = THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR
BANK GRADING LOCATIONS
& FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
7.5'
_ 4.8'
27
X25;, 15i1��
11.6.1
TYPICAL POOL RIGHT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR
BANK GRADING LOCATIONS
& FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS
7.5'
2.7' 4.8'
I,s'I
I-�-1
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
REACH: T2-2 - STATION 250+00 TO 252+87
"C4" STREAM TYPE
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN
EXTENTS
4.4'
o- -Ji
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 = THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN
EXTENTS
6.1'
3.9' 2.2'
h---7
TYPICAL POOL - RIGHT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN
EXTENTS
6.1'
2.2 3.9'
1�
251 I I I - 1 Zy,
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
REACH: T2-xsB - STATION 207+85 TO 214+50
r'C4'r STREAM TYPE
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN
EXTENTS
6.6'
2' 1.3' 1.3' 1 2'
X25;1 ~JI 25i1izo
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 = THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN
EXTENTS
9.2'
f T
I I 5.9' 3.3' I
X25; 1 � 15i1�
TYPICAL POOL RIGHT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN
EXTENTS
9.2'
f T
\25 3.3' 5.9'
1 I I I 25-1,
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
,,<aM#II's"
H CAp
s
��. A
hrAEL
•',r�11141f 1ILl��
-4' -2' 0' 4' 8'
J
GRAPHIC SCALE
REACH : T2-xsC - STATION 214+50 TO 220+99
"C4" STREAM TYPE
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN
EXTENTS
F 7.6'
X25; 1 2.31.6
I 1.5i 1.523 1
Tcs
TYPICAL RIFFLE
0 =THALWEG LOCATION
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN
EXTENTS
10.6'
r t 1
I
TYPICAL POOL RIGHT MEANDER
SEE PLAN SHEETS
FOR FLOODPLAIN
EXTENTS
10.6'
r r i
\25 3.8' 1
6.1
-_-1 2.1' I
r -I
TYPICAL POOL - LEFT MEANDER
Y
z
Q
m
Z
O_
Q
C�
c�
G
Q
LU
U)
d
LU
LU
2
Q
0
U) w
F
Z 7N
W U) Q
aZ
00
0'
W �U
z
z w�
J Z w
a LLO
O
(n
ui
W Q W
ZLLQ
V' OW
W
TYPICAL
CROSS-
REACH:
ROSS-

m�
�o �y
-40'-20' 0' 40' 80'
GRAPHIC SCALE
NOTES
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS
TO MINIMIZE DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES
WHERE POSSIBLE.
PER DESIGNERS DIRECTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL
TRANSPLANT NATIVE TREES WHERE FEASIBLE.
ALL SCRAP METAL, TIRES AND OTHER DEBRIS TO
BE REMOVED FROM STREAM AND DISPOSED OF
AT AN APPROVED OFF- SITE LOCATION.
BEFORE STARTING WORK IN LOCATIONS NOTED
ON PLANS AS'EXISTING WETLANDS', CONTRACTOR
SHALL COORDINATE WITH DESIGNER TO LIMIT
DISTURBANCE IN THESE AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE.
INSTALL'STEP POOL' AT
EXISTING HEADCUT. EXTEND
STONE MIXTURE TO GUARD
EXISTING PLUNGE POOL.
INSTALL 3' MINIMUM FLOODPLAIN 7— !
BENCH TYPICAL ALL GREY AREAS
ALONG RIGHT BANK OF COOKS CREEK).
TIE OUT AT A 2:1 SLOPE AND STABILIZE
WITH EXCELSIOR MATTING.
FLOODPLAIN BENCH
(BOTH SIDES OF TRIB 1-1)
PROPOSED'CASCADE STRUCTURE'
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
END
TRIBUTARY 1-1
4i
BEGIN COOKS CREEK (CC)
10+00
PROPOSED'STEP POOL'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
INSTALL 5' MINIMUM FLOODPLAIN BENCH
(TYPICAL ALL GREY AREAS ALONG LEFT
BANK OF COOKS CREEK). CONTRACTOR
11+010 TO TRANSPLANT NATIVE TREES WHERE
FEASIBLE.
PROPOSED 15'x30' BMP:
- _ ___--,\ \ _- ----- END EXISTING SPOIL
`� �� �� �� -- __�_ TRIBUTARY PILE TO BE REMOVED
GRADE, PLANT AND STABLIZE SIDE
EMENT I ENHANEMEN
p_ _ TII
SLOPES WITH COIR MATTING.
'f^
BOTTOM OF POOL = 1301.8'. TAPER
v
OUTLET TO MATCH EXISTING GRADE.
310
END OF NEW CASCADE WITH CLASS A/ B STONE MIXTURE
PROPOSED'RIFFLE ENHANCEMENT'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
v
BEGIN
TRIBUTARY 1-1
INSTALL 3' MINIMUM
FLOODPLAIN BENCH
(BOTH SIDES OF TRIB 1-1)
PROPOSED'CASCADE STRUCTURE'
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
END
TRIBUTARY 1-1
4i
BEGIN COOKS CREEK (CC)
10+00
PROPOSED'STEP POOL'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
INSTALL 5' MINIMUM FLOODPLAIN BENCH
(TYPICAL ALL GREY AREAS ALONG LEFT
BANK OF COOKS CREEK). CONTRACTOR
11+010 TO TRANSPLANT NATIVE TREES WHERE
FEASIBLE.
REMOVE EXISTING TAG ALDER
FROM MIDDLE OF STREAM TO
ELIMINATE NEAR BANK STRESS.
STABILIZE BED AND BANKS WHERE
NEEDED.
PROPOSED'CASCADE STRUCTURE'.
PROPOSED' CASCADE STRUCTURE'. tcl, SEE DETAIL SHEET.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
— EXISTING TREES
TO REMAIN.
TYPICAL ALL "•" INSTALL SINGLE THALWEG
THROUGH BRAIDED CHANNEL
—GRADE BANK AT 2:1
SLOPE AND STABILIZE
REINFORCE EXISTING NATURAL
WITH COIR MATTING STEPS WITH CLASS A / B STONE
MIXTURE
ENHAN
iii 111111t1t��•
H CAO .
`:�PZ...... r
WAEL •�`'
f•�Irii�ili�liiia
PROPOSED'LIVE LIFT
AND 'STEP POOL'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
� � _,,\,�_
'�����--' -= _��
- _ ___--,\ \ _- ----- END EXISTING SPOIL
`� �� �� �� -- __�_ TRIBUTARY PILE TO BE REMOVED
TO MATCH PROPOSED
EMENT I ENHANEMEN
p_ _ TII
cl
v� Nv
p
v ` G
END OF NEW CASCADE WITH CLASS A/ B STONE MIXTURE
v
�9
\ sF
\
1
REMOVE EXISTING TAG ALDER
FROM MIDDLE OF STREAM TO
ELIMINATE NEAR BANK STRESS.
STABILIZE BED AND BANKS WHERE
NEEDED.
PROPOSED'CASCADE STRUCTURE'.
PROPOSED' CASCADE STRUCTURE'. tcl, SEE DETAIL SHEET.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
— EXISTING TREES
TO REMAIN.
TYPICAL ALL "•" INSTALL SINGLE THALWEG
THROUGH BRAIDED CHANNEL
—GRADE BANK AT 2:1
SLOPE AND STABILIZE
REINFORCE EXISTING NATURAL
WITH COIR MATTING STEPS WITH CLASS A / B STONE
MIXTURE
ENHAN
iii 111111t1t��•
H CAO .
`:�PZ...... r
WAEL •�`'
f•�Irii�ili�liiia
PROPOSED'LIVE LIFT
AND 'STEP POOL'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
BEGIN _-�:�;�� _���,_L290---�_-----------
TRIBUTARY 1 _---------
EXISTING v ` , CONSERVATION�.� i276
WETLAND D' - --
---
REALIGN THALWEG AND
INSTALL'RIFFLE GRADE
CONTROL'.
REALIGN THALWEG AND
INSTALL 'CASCADE STRUCTURE'
INSTALL'LIVE LIFT' ALONG
RIGHT BANK.
END CC
�,,
GRADE INNER BANK
� � _,,\,�_
'�����--' -= _��
- _ ___--,\ \ _- ----- END EXISTING SPOIL
`� �� �� �� -- __�_ TRIBUTARY PILE TO BE REMOVED
TO MATCH PROPOSED
EMENT I ENHANEMEN
p_ _ TII
---
v� Nv
DEVELOPE POOL AT REINFORCE EXISTING RIFFLE
(TYPICAL EAS ALONG TREY RIB 1)
END OF NEW CASCADE WITH CLASS A/ B STONE MIXTURE
BEGIN _-�:�;�� _���,_L290---�_-----------
TRIBUTARY 1 _---------
EXISTING v ` , CONSERVATION�.� i276
WETLAND D' - --
---
REALIGN THALWEG AND
INSTALL'RIFFLE GRADE
CONTROL'.
REALIGN THALWEG AND
INSTALL 'CASCADE STRUCTURE'
INSTALL'LIVE LIFT' ALONG
RIGHT BANK.
END CC
�,,
GRADE INNER BANK
� � _,,\,�_
'�����--' -= _��
- _ ___--,\ \ _- ----- END EXISTING SPOIL
`� �� �� �� -- __�_ TRIBUTARY PILE TO BE REMOVED
TO MATCH PROPOSED
INSTALL 5' MINIMUM-
BANKFULL ELEVATION
FLOODPLAIN BENCH
DEVELOPE POOL AT REINFORCE EXISTING RIFFLE
(TYPICAL EAS ALONG TREY RIB 1)
END OF NEW CASCADE WITH CLASS A/ B STONE MIXTURE
PROPOSED INSTALL'RIFFLE GRADE
ACCESS PATH CONTROL' AT EXISTING
HEADGUT
PROPOSED'CASCADE STRUCTURE'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
PROPOSED'RIFFLE ENHANCEMENT.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
INSTALL'CASCADE STRUCTURE'
THROUGH EXISTING
BOULDER DROP / HEADCUT
INSTALL'STEP POOL'
AT EXISTING HEADCUT
0
v
11z Z 7N
w wa
w N QJ
0
wof
�W NU
¢ z DF
g Zw
a LLo
0
it Jui
(�
� LL
w a
Y
z
Q
m
z
O
H
Q
(D
c�
G
Q
W
H
U)
0 -
Lu
W
2
Q
2
SITE PLAN
REACH:
CC, T1, T1-1
ET 6 OF

INSTALL SWALE TO DIRECT SURFACE -
FLOW TO NEW CHANNEL. FINISH WITH
COIR MATTING. INSTALL ROCK OUTLET
1, 111111A I, I,
rH CAA^
FILL EXISTING WASHED P`
OUT CATTLE PATHS WITH D ; •S.ti
NATIVE SOIL
PROPOSED'RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL'. -
SEE DETAIL SHEET. =
-__-_ ALL EXISTING FENCING WITHIN c9s ��• X111`
-- -- EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED
PROPOSED 'CASCADE STRUCTURE'. -40' -20' 0' 40' 80' +�,�' • NAEP MP,,`s ,~
ALONG INCOMING 15 OF SWALE. SEE DETAIL SHEET. 1�'1++Illltil,,
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
PROPOSED
�--_ —_ -
\ _ _ - POOL'. GRAPHIC SCALE
REINFORCE INCOMING --a SEE DETAIL SHEET.
DRAINAGES WITH CLASS -
A / B STONE MIXTURE BEGIN TRIBUTARY 2
_ $_ ��NFMFNT (END TRIBUTARIES 2-1 & 2-2)
REST �� / 1 I -_ ----
�RATl�p I ( I 'i v -- INSTALL ROCK OUTLET ALONG
INCOMING EXISTING SWALE.
316 SEE - `�ovwv��vi� �O / / __---- SEE DETAIL SHEET.
X����i �� _� 2/ +OQG CHANNEL
EXISTING ETLAND'WA' (TYPICALAICL HATCHING) PROPOSED'CHANNEL BLOCK'.
BEGIN SEE DETAIL SHEET.
TRIBUTARY 2-1 J
--
i0 INSTALL SWALE TO DIRECT SURFACE
--- --__ - FLOW TO NEW CHANNEL. FINISH WITH
�- ,-- --- - COIR MATTING. INSTALL ROCK OUTLET
ALONG INCOMING 15'OF SWALE.
lz \ / - SEE DETAIL SHEET.
_-
` PROPOSED'CASCADESTRUCTURE'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
PROPOSED'CASCADE STRUCTURE'.O+Z
'
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
CONSF POOL'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.PROPOSED
LAIN
GRADING EXTENTS r-'� _o_9TjONF J
PROPOSED'LIVELIFT'. 1 II111 /l x x �� `-�� m.0
SEE DETAIL SHEET. i i �/i v �v , _ _ . v vv�
PROPOSED'RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET. o
EXISTING
coWETLAND'WA' --,-
PROPOSEDFLOODPLAIN_____
-GRADING EXTENTS -
__--_ _—_---- w
- - -- -- � fA
FILL EXISTING WASHED ------ - -
�! �o� OUT AREAS WITH NATIVE -------------
-4;z---- -----_ w
L SOIL -__- -=-------------
- -- - - -- _
_--_
BEGW--_ - CONSERVATIONEASEMENT
TRIBUTARY 2-2=- J \\\\\\ \ \ \
INSTALL SWALE TO DIRECT SURFACE vv g
FLOW TO NEW CHANNEL. FINISH WITH
' `� ✓ - ;%'; COIR MATTING. INSTALL ROCK OUTLET
'- �- - PROPOSED'RIFFLE ENHANCEMENT'.
' ALONG INCOMING 15OF SWALE.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
NOTES
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS TO MINIMIZE
DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES WHERE POSSIBLE.
BEFORE REMOVING ANY TREES ALONG T2-1 AND T2-2,
CONTRACTOR SHALL FIRST GET APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
ALL SCRAP METAL, TIRES AND OTHER DEBRIS TO BE REMOVED
FROM STREAM AND DISPOSED OF AT AN APPROVED OFF-SITE
LOCATION.
HARVEST STREAM BED MATERIAL BEFORE FILLING EXISTING
OFFLINE STREAM SECTIONS. HARVESTED GRAVEL MATERIAL
TO BE STOCK -PILED AND USED IN NEW STREAM BED AND
STRUCTURES. BEFORE HARVESTING BED MATERIAL, ENSURE
THAT HARVEST LOCATIONS ARE OFFLINE WITH NO FLOWING
WATER AND NO FUTURE FLOW WILL BE REESTABLISHED.
BEFORE STARTING WORK IN LOCATIONS NOTED ON PLANS AS
'EXISTING WETLANDS', CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE
WITH DESIGNER TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE IN THESE AREAS
WHERE POSSIBLE. BEFORE STARTING WORK IN LOCATIONS
NOTED ON PLANS AS'EXISTING WETLANDS', CONTRACTOR
SHALL COORDINATE WITH DESIGNER TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE
IN THESE AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE.
PROPOSED'LIVE LIFT'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
S
m �
11z Z7N
W 0a
w N ¢?
0
a m ow
�W W,U
¢ Z �F
3 Zw
a z
0
O
w JLH
(�
� LL
W y
Y
Z
Q
m
Z Q
_O z
J
U <
O
2
rY
O
W
z
U) O
U
D_ r
W
W
= cn
U)
Q
_
SITE PLAN
REACH:
T2, T2-1, T2-2

w
W
W
x
U)
Lu
w
0
W
Z
J
2
U
Q
PROPOSED'CHANNELBLOCK'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
INSTALL SWALE TO DIRECT SURFACE
FLOW TO NEW CHANNEL. FINISH WITH
COIR MATTING. INSTALL ROCK OUTLET
ALONG INCOMING 15' OF SWALE.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
EXISTING-
WETLAND'WB' - -- \ �� - -
\ - O� _CONSERVATION EASEMENT-; - - _ -
i _
-- - 1240-
�\
_\ \��--
_-_-_ter �►��_� / I � �� \ \ \ -- ___ _ ___.__ __ -_1245'-- __ -_ --� � � �� �� �� ��
-- = l \ _-_----_-_-_--1260-_-
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
(TYPICAL ALL HATCHING)
�I''.1� �Je�, eco►
NSERVATION EASEMENT
REMOVE BREACHED POND LEVEE.
EXISTING GRADE TO MATCH PROPOSED
WETLAND'WC' FLOODPLAIN EXTENTS. PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN
GRADING EXTENTS
PROPOSED'RIFFLE ENHANCEMENT'. GO
SEE DETAIL SHEET. PROPOSED'CASCADE STRUCTURE'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
IS 111111
CAP?
oar � ..... �
s
LA
'' . NAIL �;.•'`
1�1111111111� _
-40'-20' 0' 40' 80'
GRAPHIC SCALE
END
TRIBUTARY 2
NOTES
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS TO MINIMIZE
DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES WHERE POSSIBLE.
BEFORE REMOVING ANY TREES ALONG T2-1 AND T2-2,
CONTRACTOR SHALL FIRST GET APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
ALL SCRAP METAL, TIRES AND OTHER DEBRIS TO BE REMOVED
FROM STREAM AND DISPOSED OF AT AN APPROVED OFF-SITE
LOCATION.
HARVEST STREAM BED MATERIAL BEFORE FILLING EXISTING
OFFLINE STREAM SECTIONS. HARVESTED GRAVEL MATERIAL
TO BE STOCK -PILED AND USED IN NEW STREAM BED AND
STRUCTURES. BEFORE HARVESTING BED MATERIAL, ENSURE
THAT HARVEST LOCATIONS ARE OFFLINE WITH NO FLOWING
WATER AND NO FUTURE FLOW WILL BE REESTABLISHED.
BEFORE STARTING WORK IN LOCATIONS NOTED ON PLANS AS
'EXISTING WETLANDS', CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE
WITH DESIGNER TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE IN THESE AREAS
WHERE POSSIBLE. BEFORE STARTING WORK IN LOCATIONS
NOTED ON PLANS AS'EXISTING WETLANDS', CONTRACTOR
SHALL COORDINATE WITH DESIGNER TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE
IN THESE AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE.
Y
z
Q
00
z
_O
H
Q
Q
W
U)
0-
W
W
2
W
Q
2
Q
z
0
Q
U
2
O
z
z
D
O
U
r
U)
SITE PLAN
REACH:
T2 (CONTINUED)
N
0
o
�
w
w�
w
0)<
PROPOSED'STEP POOL'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
U)
<�
o0
/
o w
wv
z
15
]x
w�
zw
PROPOSED'LIVE LIFT'.
SEE DETAIL SHEET.
N
OZ
�+
rn x
J
/
w
Z
W
ai ¢�
Z
w
�K
e
END
TRIBUTARY 2
NOTES
CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS TO MINIMIZE
DAMAGING EXISTING NATIVE TREES WHERE POSSIBLE.
BEFORE REMOVING ANY TREES ALONG T2-1 AND T2-2,
CONTRACTOR SHALL FIRST GET APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER.
ALL SCRAP METAL, TIRES AND OTHER DEBRIS TO BE REMOVED
FROM STREAM AND DISPOSED OF AT AN APPROVED OFF-SITE
LOCATION.
HARVEST STREAM BED MATERIAL BEFORE FILLING EXISTING
OFFLINE STREAM SECTIONS. HARVESTED GRAVEL MATERIAL
TO BE STOCK -PILED AND USED IN NEW STREAM BED AND
STRUCTURES. BEFORE HARVESTING BED MATERIAL, ENSURE
THAT HARVEST LOCATIONS ARE OFFLINE WITH NO FLOWING
WATER AND NO FUTURE FLOW WILL BE REESTABLISHED.
BEFORE STARTING WORK IN LOCATIONS NOTED ON PLANS AS
'EXISTING WETLANDS', CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE
WITH DESIGNER TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE IN THESE AREAS
WHERE POSSIBLE. BEFORE STARTING WORK IN LOCATIONS
NOTED ON PLANS AS'EXISTING WETLANDS', CONTRACTOR
SHALL COORDINATE WITH DESIGNER TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE
IN THESE AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE.
Y
z
Q
00
z
_O
H
Q
Q
W
U)
0-
W
W
2
W
Q
2
Q
z
0
Q
U
2
O
z
z
D
O
U
r
U)
SITE PLAN
REACH:
T2 (CONTINUED)

REACH COOKS CREEK
1282
1278
1274
1270
1266
1262
1258
10+00
EXISTING,
r RADF
11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00
REACH TRIBUTARY 1
`
EXISTING
GRADE
1302
a
- ---
--
-
n
23+00 24+00 25+00
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
----------------
O
1298
U
�
----- ---
- - - --
e
-
J \
0
--'---- --'--
n
-------
'T---M-ZO
----------
Q
=
�>
------- ----
---------
>
0
-
o
-
o
-
. --
--------
o
o;--
-
--
tea'
-------��----------��-------
--�, ----��----------�,
----��--
--------r----
n>'n>
----
-------- --------
------- --
---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
---------
--------------
------- --
---- -- ----
-- --------------
--,-a --; -- J
a --; -��--.-----,--��--;-
��--
--�--,----------
;--�----- -�--
--�-----�----
---- ---- - --------------
;<
--------------------------
> w
------------
--- - -- --------------
---------- r -
-
- -----------
------------
------------------�-----�--
------
---------
fY
+
LL
- '
------
-- -- ------
----'--•--'--
--•--•- --•----'-\
_
--
Z N
-
u+�i
------- ----
_
>r ------
--------------------------
------------
--------------------------
---------------
------ -- ---
----
--------------------------
�'
_
---_
_
__--__---
\ \ --------
Q H Q
- -
r_r�
O
N'
Q
W
.
----------'--
-----------------i--'----
------i
m
LL��
-
N ' �
-
IT
N
-
_-----_
W'
�
\ \ .r
___________-
�
i 1. \ �
_
W W
- - --
� w � > w
-
------
�
�
__-
Z' Q
O U
K
II;R
m
lo; -
- -
- --
-
------------
--------�---------
--1-----�--
--�-' ------
--�-----�--
--�-----1----
-
----r----r--------
-
-----
-----------
-'----------
--------------------------
--------------------------
------------
--------�----------r-----�--
LL
'�
>
�.O
O'N
'iii
K',
1286
- -'
----'
-
-
-------------------------
--'- --
--'r-'- -- -----
-- ----- - --
------------
-
- ---------------
-----
-----------------
- --
------------
--- ---------
- - ------
------- ----
--- _ - ------
------------
--------------------------
-
'---- -----------
- ----
-------
' ------
+
n
_
;W
Z w'
�'
-------------------*-------
- ---
--
------ ------
-------------
-------,--
------- -- ----
-- ---- --
---
»
�--N
H .----
-- ---- -- ----
_
o m
---- --
PROPOSED
-
---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
z.
V
PROFILE
1282
o,�o,
---- -- ----
-- ------- -------*-------
--�---- -- ----
-- ---- --
---- -- ----
-- ---- -- -------
--� ----
w w
-----�Kn o------
------- --
---- -- ----
-- ---�
< ��-
a �-- ---- --
------- -------
------- --
---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
----'--`--'--
- ---'---`----`---'-
-
---------------
-----------
------------
--------------------------
---------------
-------- ---
------------
----- -
-
-----------
--------------------------
------------
--------------------------
�>
w.j
w•
•
11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00
1306
1302
1298
1294
1290
1286
1282
30+00
,`L
O r
REACH TRIBUTARY 1
EXISTING
GRADE
1302
a
--
23+00 24+00 25+00
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
----------------
O
1298
U
�
N
O
a
--'---- --'--
\ - -
-------
'T---M-ZO
----------
�>
y
>
> W
>
>
. --
--------
--
-
--
---------�-�
-------��----------��-------
--�, ----��----------�,
----��--
--------r----
---------- ----------,
----
-------- --------
------- --
---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
---------
--------------
------- --
---- -- ----
-- --------------
---- --
1294
>
---------
fY
+
----'--•--'--
--•--•- --•----'-\
-
--
Z N
-
Z
---
------- ----
--------------------------
--------------------------
------------
--------------------------
---------------
--------- --------
-
----
--------------------------
Q H Q
H
.
1290
_ _
W
a
W'
------------
--------�---------
--1-----�--
--�-' ------
--�-----�--
--�-----1----
-
----r----r--------
-
-----
-----------
-'----------
--------------------------
--------------------------
------------
--------�----------r-----�--
LL
1286
- -'
----'
-
-'-
-
-------------------------
------- -- ----
o
�,
>,.
--
- ----
'
---------- --------
--------
- -
- --
----------
--------
PROPppSEQ ------------
-
'---- -----------
- ----
-------
' ------
+
n
------------
-------------------*-------
PROP t-
-----------------------
-------`-'4
-- ---- ---------
-------
---------'----•
N-'--,
(A
�--N
H .----
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
--------------
------- --
---- -- ----
-- ---- -- ----
-- ---- --
z.
.w
1282
---- -- ----
-------',--------------',--
-------,-- ----
------,--
--',----,----
----I-----�----'�--
-
--,`- i -
----'�---- -----
-- -ww
---. m
¢�;---
o -.-N
a- ----
-- ---- ---------
-------
-- $-'
--- ------- --
-----------
------�-- ----
------i--
-
.
I
•
IT
-
- - -
- -
--'--------'--
-----------------
i '
-
-------
-------- ---
- - --
--------------------------------
--
----------------
---- -----
----
-- -----
---------------
------ --
--
Z-- -Z
---
---
---------
------ -------
-
0
OO.
O
1278
m'
20+00
21+00 22+00
�
rnrn
N
-
- - - - - -
- - - - - - -
-- --'-
--'--' --=---
- '----
- -- ----- ------
- -
-- --- -
>
---- ------
WW> W
>
N o
---- -
---- -----
REACH TRIBUTARY 1-1'
EXISTINGPROPOSED
GRADE PROFILE
- - - -
--.- --` --
- - -
- -------------
---
- --------
--------------------------
-
----------'�
--,-------`--
-----------
N
---
O N
'--
-------
-----------
-------�----
-----�-----�-.
1306
1302
1298
1294
1290
1286
1282
30+00
,`L
O r
a
--
23+00 24+00 25+00
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
y
O
U
�
N
O
a
--'---- --'--
\ - -
-------
'T---M-ZO
----------
�>
y
>
> W
31+00 32+00
- - i --------------
--------------------- ------ -- ------------- --
- - - - $ N 0
N O_ N 0.
--•- --` -- -- --•---'------- ---------- -------------------- ------------------------- - - -------------------------- --- --------------.
.� Z,- 0,
---- ---- -- ---
-------------- ---------------------- -- ---- -- ---- -- ---- -- ---- -- - w,-- �-, ------------------ ------ ,<- ---- -- ---- ----- -- -.
rL
> w
af
Z
z
W
Q
z
O
Q
U
x
H
O
z
}
H
z
D
O
U
}
U)
0
W
W �
�n
� N
N Q
Q J
00
W0W
NU
�r
WX
z0
LLZ
U) V
Q W
LL
O
V
PROFILES
REACH:
CC, T1, T1-1
23+00 24+00 25+00
26+00
27+00
28+00
29+00
af
Z
z
W
Q
z
O
Q
U
x
H
O
z
}
H
z
D
O
U
}
U)
0
W
W �
�n
� N
N Q
Q J
00
W0W
NU
�r
WX
z0
LLZ
U) V
Q W
LL
O
V
PROFILES
REACH:
CC, T1, T1-1

111114+JI
-
••' CA '
Z&
_ s
�+V
Z
{
O
E�
iw..••P
+��)�
REACH TRIBUTARY 2-1
REACH TRIBUTARY
����
1294
N
1�.•,,.
'JJ 1l11II11L51
1290
O N .
O
z,o
r Q
O. M Q J W
J c m
�N'
1286
w
y
- a .0
«_fly__
T.
1282
-
r
N V
__ � N -IJ. n N. � M W 00 '
\ . : > Iu : : S
PRO EXISTING
J 0 : No z >
PROFILE GRADE
U)1278
J :r a:a :z w: :
--'- --` -- - ---'- -------'- .Ii < --\_--- -- ---- ---= W. yr _W ---
-�-,----; -'--- -------------------------- ------------ ------
--------------- -------------�----�-----�----------�-----�--
N
�z r
wo
-
—
U'
Z W J
_ ____ _ _,
- -
_ W tOp :
O U
W (n
Z
1274
Q LL r
Q. o Z N
O W
00
U
� ig '�. �:
z o .Z
.q
W r
__ ________ ___ __
_
_ ____________ _____________._____________ _______________ _____ ______
__
_
Z
O>
w o 'o.z'
1270
_.____
------
-----
__ ___p-
A_wW /
N.
Q
NLu
_
____
__ __ __
__
--
WJLL
J__
_______ _______
____
____
> W•>
>
__
/
W
—
I+l,,V-[i,.
-JWrtL•wJ
—d
W --
.aO
•'rN
t'> __H
0
_ N
M_
.,_�+
N-.-o- rip . <V _Nm_
__,_______ _______
__ ____
__
____ __ ____
__ ____,__
_______ _______
__�
____,_______
__�____
__ ____ __ __
—
(�
_ _
_ __
__
�N
O
`___�_
Q_
_
_ -
___
_
_
__
_
_
___
___
_
Zz
W
V
:
1266
W
\
S
S
1 N
W
N
f
N m
_
^c
�p
ffO¢+
WN
mNrri_) W¢>
>
W
4rd l\
Na OFWOND
GZ_WY
----------------------
z
NN
tp'_AQ
i
:Nd
O
^>
ON> -
.•
av
1262
----'
Q
NS.�
S.
�.�
n
:$N9
R:
-
-
.'vvO-♦
:
>N .'N
�_
•e
NZ_N
'
-_ -_
-_
-_
-
_
_
_ _
..��app
.••ryd
_
_ • NV'
fcW..
Z N'
•Z ....^
.•..
.N
R+
t0
,
_
__
O
Ora
. m-
Zor�'
a> WJ a> -wIJYl
rn
Na-,.
ya-
�Q
':Na
ZoN¢
zo,; Y�O.
ptp 'litp
\y_Ji
f
>
a>
WJw'• •`ar
'Na
,
•'
vON
\�
Q
Q>
.
�-___
'
NvONNm
N
1258
.
J
'w
>'J>
w'
.N N
_
Q.
. N
Z _ _
Z
O
_ +
ry
N_ �- -
N
>
W -
a
W
.> >
a
— a
—
��-¢
4
w,V
r
m
:,4
4\
\�,
N>
_
N>
_
W
N
O. N
p . m
NV
Q
m
az0
�'�
-M
'✓'
-a
I
'�
a
r•d
r
'� n
.:�
�
---------------------------
DS
J VI
Q O
a
N
N®
M
I
sn
�; ��;
I¢FNO
O �
z
pj
W
w aw'.aw�,
zN.z:+
.+
\I
\
\aill:
aJ
Q
1254
W W
r Fr Q N
a wa w H
z
OWi+
Z
o•N•
__ _
__ _ ,\
_
_ ____
------
_
_ `��•>
wa
:<
za
q_
Z'
J
O
__'__'_____'__
__'__'__'__________'__'__'__
..'.. 1.. ]..L
> J> 'J y
>
W W.
>�
>
N
N,
v
a
_
ti
a a
r
a
--'--�'--`--'--
--`--'----- `-------
'-------
------- '--'- --
-
- -
- --
-
- --
-
- -
-
--
-
- ---
. a
-
wa
-
� - -
Z.
d of
- -
---
-
-
\
_
a
----- -
-�
�'---
(_� Q
'N
N'
a• •N
� N
�
m 'LOON
�`
V
1250
z
-------------
------- -----------------
---- --
- ----
------------
-- --
- ----- - - ----
----
- -
-
-
r
- -
� �Q �
--
o
c�'l iY���
iV:
-
- -
. fq
.a
Q t0
W
a
Z N, Z
O O�
a NtO�
N'
C O
W 'QN Q'
N
�o
Z
Zry'
z•
1246
a:
-
F o
w v
m'
W
>
�l
J
O_
A_ e
v
•N
-
-
> N
z
0
Z.
-.o
O
____
__L__'J__________1__'__J__
__'________'
Q
O Q
OCV
Z N
'z
c..i
w
wr
Fr
F'
o
1242
a w a
w`q aln •¢
d
____ __ ____
w-'
w
in
__•__e___ __
_____•_ _________
__•_____
__________________________
____________
__________________________
---------------
_________--------
________
__________________________
________--------
_________--------
_------------------
___________________
________--------
___
_____--------
________
-------- ______
1238
200+00
201+00 202+00 203+00
204+00 205+00
206+00 207+00 208+00
209+00
210+00 211+00
Q
2
DATE, DECEMBER
2018
1"=40'
PROFILES
REACH:
T2-1 & T2
SHEET 10 OF
z1

REACH TRIBUTARY 2
(CONTINUED)
1258
owe?
oN.N
)
___
1254
. . .
,y
___�__ ________________
.
°
Nr
--'_O'__�_______
r
__
a>ia>o
t
W
T
W N W Z
C
-
.�
©N
�
�.
o
a-------------
--------------------------
��V�
•NW
NNZp VN
------------
--------------------------
----------� -
1250
aFdF
________n
N of
t__� Il}-
vt
-"I
I
au a�
no
�z� O
- w
aJ
Z r
ci
M
r � 0
grz_uN,z
N__05
aD
__________________,_____
r
Q
NON
W+
N p
N
NZNz •mm
.vim
N_•____'__;_
>W-
.,�.� a -J 1
w
o
rQ�r .�F
fnQHa_'N
w
!
--f .;7
a
rn
ryo
a a4 a_
my~�
w
Y - -- --_>
1
>w; ;ate-
\
----
a
wN
mb
-'--
rpnr,_O
--' -'--.>w-
--------------------------
rn
w
'd>J
.c�o�.„�
r r�
i
---
�+
fG [V
No
M N W
N -
--
- - -
mlom�
r
a
/
1246
�:--
-_------_�--:-T��-----y.1
T
\_ •>
w> •
w
___
�.
QF
>J
,>J yq MQ
W �>
Z .
N
rti.
.
>W �W
m--------------------------------------
zra_•.'zF�
-
\
_.W
' a,
-W
a
nr
�F
r �Np
¢°>
'>w_
___
_____
_________
_
>
______
y
____
w 'r
Q
\
0;
Ja
W>
•z
Z
,S
U
o
W
- _
a
.`
�. N
�: 'r
p
o
aev
1242
N
< Z
>
J >
v
w
\ a
J a
•J N
O : �. z;
NN n
z
a
p p
a
- -
O
�
w
.a.
w•
2'
W
_
> _ >
�_
m
EL
N
N
.
cll
--
W - J
- -
xd'ad-`16---'--
;
,W j
N
Z N Z
O_
W
--------
--
-- ----
- ----
1
> _
w
w
r
_O .
r r •r
z
z
NZ•N
.Z
K)�[)
mom. �
g
1238
W,
a;
r;Nb
Q
-;n
Z
> w'
^�.
1;W:uri-
a
_J _.> _J____,_
S '¢-
K_
__;N
w
z,.__
___
_
a
- ---- -- --
z__N
M
g
'.
A;__
N
�_
to
Q
Q m
IV
>
W
>
>�
W _
_• N0
a
a.
o,
''
1234
1218
,_ha
�•N _>,
cam_
----
---
• to
Q
tn•
Q
O, Q
O
1214
i-
- ----'
'---- ' _
_-I____- -- ____----
__-_
w
w;
rn
dv�
wa
go
N
N
z
v o
a
w
Wo
fq Q N Q.
- -
-
- -- -
- -- -
W ' W '
O_ �
O_
a;w
w
zF
1230
N,
N
w
____________
__________________________
___________
----
____----
___
________--------
________________________
r
___N_
a
rr
Q
w`a
r
w
1210
---- ____-------
___'________________'__'__
__`_'__'__`____'__'__'__'__
__'__'__'__'__
__'__'__J__'____'__'__'__'__
>,
>
__'__W__u_
J>
J
1226
rQrv�
W
; ; ; ;
1222
z
211+00
212+00
213+00
214+00
215+00
REACH TRIBUTARY 2-2
EXISTING
1294 GRADE
1290
1286
1282
1278
1274
1270
1266
1262
1258
250+00
F- PROPOSED
251+00 252+00 253+00 254+00
jyli�lll llt,ff
ek CAR
g -
ter;'• 2
k►1EL
�f 111111/411
owe?
oN.N
)
___
__
o
,y
___�__ ________________
°
Nr
a
r
a>ia>o
W
T
W N W Z
C
Np
QQ
_
N
Nn
N ,y,
N --m
��V�
•NW
NNZp VN
VN ; rnrmo. rn
________n
N of
t__� Il}-
---
_'--!-_'----------------
------- -----
au a�
no
�z� O
- w
aJ
Z r
ci
M
r � 0
grz_uN,z
N__05
aD
__________________,_____
r
Q
NON
W+
N p
N
NZNz •mm
.vim
N_•____'__;_
>W-
.,�.� a -J 1
w
o
rQ�r .�F
fnQHa_'N
w
!
--f .;7
a
rn
ryo
a a4 a_
my~�
w
Y - -- --_>
1
>w; ;ate-
-----;-- ---*----_--r-----'--
----
waw .r rF
>�>w -- wq
a �rmr• oo
+cu+n,_o�-mom--'
mb
-'--
-
--: -- - -'-- --'--'-
--' -'--.>w-
--------------------------
rn
w
'd>J
.c�o�.„�
r r�
i
---
�+
fG [V
No
M N W
N -
--
- - -
mlom�
r
a
/
-- ��--`-- 'R --'--:v �n
N- -- ----
-- ---- -----------
--'-----
>J
,>J yq MQ
W �>
npj
rti.
o
>W �W
m--------------------------------------
zra_•.'zF�
sNvr»ii°�-
»__rw_•:.E__
¢°>
'>w_
___
251+00 252+00 253+00 254+00
jyli�lll llt,ff
ek CAR
g -
ter;'• 2
k►1EL
�f 111111/411
PROFILES
REACH:
T2 & T2-2
o
°
Nr
a
r
_
--r----lp
N ,y,
N --m
________n
N of
t__� Il}-
---
_'--!-_'----------------
------- -----
- w
aJ
Z r
r � 0
Q
r
Q
N
a
rn
>
z ..
z ui �'?
vi
rn
i
---
�+
o no
No
M N W
N -
--
- - -
r
/
zO
rti.
o
W
O -
�¢
•O
rn
O'
u
N
O'er O'
mo.
a
%
Ja
W>
•z
Z
,S
U
o
W
- _
a
�', _� o
m
�: 'r
< Z
>
J >
v
m
\ a
J a
•J N
O : �. z;
NN n
z
a
p p
a
- -
O
�
r'
j;
;2
2'
W
_
> _ >
�_
m
EL
N
N
.
cll
--
W - J
- -
xd'ad-`16---'--
_
�
n ' uop_
W
W
NZ•N
.Z
K)�[)
mom. �
>,W>.
W,
a;
r;Nb
.+
O
'
Z
> w'
1;W:uri-
S '¢-
w
-
_
a
- ---- -- --
W
N
�_
to
Q
Q m
IV
>
W
>
J
1218
,_ha
�•N _>,
cam_
----
---
w a w
z
N z
0
1214
i-
- ----'
'---- ' _
_-I____- -- ____----
__-_
4
w
Wo
fq Q N Q.
- -
-
- -- -
- -- -
W ' W '
O_ �
O_
N,
N
1210
>,
W, >
d:
rQrv�
W
z
--------------
1206
Q
-4--: -----
____---
--` --
-------
- ---'- --=------
--'--�'--
-------�---------------
--
------------
--------------------------
--------------------------
------------
-------------
1202
216+00 217+00 218+00 219+00 220+00 221+00 222+00
Q
Lu
L.L
W
0 -
Lu
Lu
2
W
(i
Q
2
PROFILES
REACH:
T2 & T2-2

RIPARIAN FOREST PLANTING:
PLANTING ZONE 1 = 1.9 ACRES
12" - 18" BARE ROOT MATERIAL
968 STEMS/ACRE (9'X 5' SPACING), RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT
COMMON NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME
STATUS
% OF TOTAL
# OF PLANTS
AMERICAN SYCAMORE
PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS
FACW
20
370
SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK
QUERCUS MICHAUXII
FACW
20
370
GREEN ASH
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA
FACW
20
370
RIVER BIRCH
BETULA NIGRA
FACW
20
370
WILLOW OAK
QUERCUS PHELLOS
FAC
10
185
TAG ALDER
ALNUS SERRULATA
OBL
10
185
PLANTING ZONE 2 = 10.1 ACRES
12" - 18" BARE ROOT MATERIAL
968 STEMS/ACRE (9'X 5' SPACIN
COMMON NAME
SCIEI
GREEN ASH
FRA:
AMERICAN SYCAMORE
PLAT
WILLOW OAK
QUE
WHITE OAK
QUE
SUGARBERRY
CEL"
PIN OAK
QUE
STREAM ZONE:
STREAM ZONE
LIVE STAKES: 1.5' TO 2' LENGTF
PLANT ONE ROW PER BANK AT
COMMON NAME S
BLACK WILLOW S
SILKY WILLOW S
SILKY DOGWOOD C
NOTE: NO SINGLE LIVE STAKIN
SHALL COMPOSE MORE
NUMBER OF LIVE STAKE
1,850
Q
Z
J
O
Q
U
2
O
z
r
z
D
O
U
0
0
wo
w w
F
� N
� Q
a?
00
0:<w
wo
�_
0r
w�
Z
0
0z
J
aw
w�
0
v
PLANTING PLAN
REACH:
CC. T1. T1-1

1111}1}}1j1
�,IqH CAR
Y
Z
° v
` •i
0 " SQUARE CUT Q
H O
Y S
0 z BUDS
rm (FACING UPWARD) o
0 L ,i ►V= v
m0 Z
LIVE CUTTING
(0.5" TO 2" DIAMETER)
Irlllliillti 111 '
LIVE STAKE
ANGLE CUT 30°-45
STREAMBAN/(CROSS-SECTION
PLANTING NOTES:
RIFFLES - 1 ROW OF LIVE STAKES ON BOTH SIDES OF CHANNEL.
POOLS - NO LIVE STAKES ON INNER BENDS, 1 ROW ON OUTER BENDS.
9Q C9
-80'-40' 0' 80' 160'U) W
LIVE STAKES I..=4=_ W NQ
SCALE: NTS GRAPHIC SCALE a?
PLANTING ZONE 1 &<
0
W NU
Zo7F
J Z
WK
a. LL
O_Z
O_0: J
W J -U'
PLANTING ZONE 2 Z LLJ
W ��
STREAM ZONE
_7_
*NOTE: SEE SHEET 12 FOR PLANTING QUANTITIES
Y
Z
Q
co
Z Q
O z
Q °
C� 0
� U
2
O
W
z
/ W O
U
}
W
W
2 cl)
U)
000
Q
2
DATE: DECEMBER 2018
SCALE GRAPHIC
PLANTING PLAN
REACH:
T2, T2-1, T2-2
SHEET 13 OF 21

EASEMENT BOUNDARY MARKING
THE EASEMENT BOUNDARY WILL BE MARKED
WITH METAL POSTS AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SIGNS AT THE CORNERS AND AT A MINIMUM OF 100'
INTERVALS ALONG THE BOUNDARY.
O 5/8" REBAR 30" IN LENGTH WITH 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAPS
ON ALL EASEMENT CORNERS.
6 -FOOT TALL DURABLE WITNESS POST ALONG BOUNDARY
OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT. POSTS SHALL BE MADE
OF MATERIAL THAT WILL LAST A MINIMUM OF 20 YEARS.
THE PROV DER SHALL ATTACH A CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SIGN TO EACH WITNESS POST AND PLACE ADDITIONAL SIGNS
AT NO MORE THAN 100 -FOOT INTERVALS ON BOUNDARY LINES.
INSTALL WOVEN WIRE FENCE
1111 1f F/ifl,Il
CAq
S
2
:p • 4?
�1�1111 /414i1i
-f-
x
f
2yn
9O ov
x ;pro
0
U o
v
-40'-20' 0' 40' 80' V) L
f U
GRAPHIC SCALE w ao
OU
W
Z
Z W H
J Z �
d LLz
Ir OU
L Z laL W
T W
r \
T"
� Y
Z
x -74- Q
m
Z Q
X O z
XX f < w
X
x X
z
LU �
z
(j o
X d }
W
X X X 2 U)
X �
X X
X X X =
BOUNDARY
MARKING
PLAN

EASEMENT BOUNDARY MARKING
THE EASEMENT BOUNDARY WILL BE MARKED
WITH METAL POSTS AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SIGNS AT THE CORNERS AND AT A MINIMUM OF 100'
INTERVALS ALONG THE BOUNDARY.
O 5/8" REBAR 30" IN LENGTH WITH 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAPS
ON ALL EASEMENT CORNERS.
6 -FOOT TALL DURABLE WITNESS POST ALONG BOUNDARY
OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT. POSTS SHALL BE MADE
OF MATERIAL THAT WILL LAST A MINIMUM OF 20 YEARS.
THE PROV DER SHALL ATTACH A CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SIGN TO EACH WITNESS POST AND PLACE ADDITIONAL SIGNS
AT NO MORE THAN 100 -FOOT INTERVALS ON BOUNDARY LINES.
— X — INSTALL WOVEN WIRE FENCE
—80'-40' 0' 80' 160' u
1� z
GRAPHIC SCALE
�o
k
z
X Q
m
z
y\ O
X
F-
2
+ 1� �_ X �— X �— X — �— X
X k y�
X Lu
f x '� ~\ X F-
- X X XX Lu
�- X �— X —�— X X T-
Q
2
ole
Q
z
J
0
Q
U
0
z
z
0
U
}
tY
U)
BOUNDARY
MARKING
PLAN

SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. IT IS THE INTENT OF THESE PLANS THAT AS SOON AS AN AREA OF GRADING IS COMPLETE IT
SHALL BE STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES DESCRIBED
IN THESE PLANS.DUE TO THE ANTICIPATED DURATION AND SEQUENCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO MINIMIZE, AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, THE AMOUNT
OF THE AREA THAT IS DISTURBED AT ONE TIME.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EVERY REASONABLE PRECAUTION THROUGHOUT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION. EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROJECT PLANS, NORTH CAROLINA SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL GUIDELINES AND AS
DIRECTED BY THE DESIGNER.
3. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FOR
LATER USE AS FILL MATERIAL. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING SILT FENCE
AROUND THE STOCKPILE AREA(S) AND ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SPOIL AND TOPSOIL
PILES TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION.
4. IN THE EVENT OF A STORM, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OR
PROTECTION OF ANY EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, MATERIALS OR OTHER ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE
THE WORK THAT COULD BE AFFECTED BY STORMWATER.
5. EACH SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE WILL BE REMOVED AFTER ALL WORK IN THE CORRESPONDING
CONSTRUCTION PHASE HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND ADEQUATE PERMANENT GROUND COVER HAS
BEEN RE-ESTABLISHED ON THE DISTURBED AREAS, AS DETERMINED BY THE DESIGNER.
6. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND STAGING AREAS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS PROVIDE THE
ONLY ACCESS POINTS INTO THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. NO ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINTS SHALL
BE USED WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE DESIGNER.
7. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE LOW SIDE OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SPOIL
AND TOPSOIL PILES. THESE SPOIL PILES SHALL ALSO BE SEEDED AND MULCHED FOR VEGETATIVE
STABILIZATION WITHIN 7 DAYS THAT THEY ARE CREATED. ALL SPOIL MATERIAL SHALL STAY ON
THE SITE AND SHALL NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
8. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND FUNCTIONAL
OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF PRODUCING RAIN EVENT AND/OR AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK.
ANY NEEDED MAINTENANCE OR REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL MEASURES
AS DESIGNED. ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM CONTROL MEASURES WHEN THEY
REACH APPROXIMATELY 50% OF THEIR FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY. THESE MEASURES SHALL BE REPAIRED
IF DISTURBED DURING MAINTENANCE. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AND
MULCHED, AS NECESSARY, TO PROMOTE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATION COVER.
9. THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND EROSION CONTROL CONTACT FOR THIS SITE IS TIM MORRIS.
OFFICE PHONE [phone] / CELL PHONE [phone].
10. ALL EXCESS WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED FACILITY OR SITE.
(15A NCAC 04B.01 10)
SEDIMENTATION &EROSION
CONTROL PLAN LEGEND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
SILT FENCE
STRAW WADDLE
TEMPORARY BRIDGE MAT STREAM CROSSING
STREAM TO BE FILLED
STAGING AREA
STOCK PILE
TEMPORARY CHANNEL DIVERSION
SEEDING AND PLANTING NOTES:
TEMPORARY SEED MIX
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE THE FOLLOWING SEED/FERTILIZER
MIX IN SEEDING ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS:
SUMMER MIX (MAY 15 - AUGUST 15)
GERMAN MILLET - - - - - - SETARIA ITALICA _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 20 LBS / ACRE
BROWNTOP MILLET _ _ _-UROCHLOA RAMOSA ---- 20 LBS / ACRE
WINTER MIX (AUGUST 15 - MAY 15)
RYE GRAINSECALE CEREALE _______120LBS /ACRE
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE THE PERMANENT SEED MIXES
INDICATED BELOW. THE UPLAND SEED MIX SHOULD BE USED IN
DRYER PARTS OF THE SITE, WHILE THE RIPARIAN SEED MIX
SHOULD BE USED LONG THE FLOODPLAIN AND BANKFULL BENCHES
AND AS DIRECTED BY THE DESIGNER.
PERMANENT UPLAND SEED MIX
SUMMER MIX (MAY 15 -AUGUST 15)
WINTER MIX (AUGUST 15 -- MAY 15)
APPLICATION RATE (IN MIX)
SPECIES
% OF MIX
LBS/ACRE
ORCHARDGRASS - DACTYLIS GLOMERATA
5
1.5
BLUESTEM -- ANDROPOGON GLOMERATUS
5
1.5
VIRGINIA WILDRYE -- ELYMUS VIRGINICUS
10
3.0
RIVER OATS - CHASMANTHIUM LATIFOLIUM
5
1.5
DEERTONGUE -- PANICUM CLANDESTINUM
25
7.5
SWITCHGRASS -- PANICUM VIRGATUM
25
7.5
PEARL MILLET- PENNISETUM GLAUCOMA
25
7.5
TOTALS 100
30
WINTER MIX (AUGUST 15 -- MAY 15)
PERMANENT RIPARIAN SEED MIX
SUMMER MIX (MAY 15 -AUGUST 15)
APPLICATION RATE (IN MIX)
APPLICATION RATE (IN MIX)
SPECIES
% OF MIX
LBS/ACRE
ORCHARDGRASS -- DACTYLIS GLOMERATA
5
1.5
BLUESTEM-- ANDROPOGON GLOMERATUS
5
1.5
VIRGINIA WILDRYE -- ELYMUS VIRGINICUS
10
3.0
RIVER OATS -- CHASMANTHIUM LATIFOLIUM
5
1.5
DEERTONGUE -- DICHANTHELIUM CLANDESTINUM 25
7.5
SWITCHGRASS -- PANICUM VIRGATUM
25
7.5
RYE GRAIN -- SECALE CEREALE
25
7.5
TOTALS 100
30
PERMANENT RIPARIAN SEED MIX
SUMMER MIX (MAY 15 -AUGUST 15)
APPLICATION RATE (IN MIX)
SPECIES % OF MIX
LBS/ACRE
VIRGINIA WILDRYE - ELYMUS VIRGINICUS
15
4.6
BIG BLUESTEM -- ANDROPOGON GERARDII
8
2.3
SWITCHGRASS -- PANICUM VIRGATUM
11
3.3
AUTUMN BENTGRASS -AGROSTIS PERENNANS
11
3.3
BLACK-EYED SUSAN -- RUDBECKIA HIRTA
8
2.3
LANCELEAF COREOPSIS - COREOPSIS LANCEOLATA
8
2.3
SOFT RUSH - JUNCUS EFFUSUS
4
1.1
LITTLE BLUESTEM - SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM
4
1.1
INDIAN GRASS - SORGHASTRUM NUTANS
4
1.1
EASTERN GAMMA--TRIPSACUM DACTYLOIDES
4
1.1
PEARL MILLET - PENNISETUM GLAUCOMA
25
7.5
TOTALS
100
30
WINTER MIX (AUGUST 15 -- MAY 15)
APPLICATION RATE (IN MIX)
SPECIES % OF MIX
LBS/ACRE
VIRGINIA WILDRYE - ELYMUS VIRGINICUS
15
4.6
BIG BLUESTEM -- ANDROPOGON GERARDII
8
2.3
SWITCHGRASS -- PANICUM VIRGATUM
11
3.3
AUTUMN BENTGRASS--AGROSTIS PERENNANS
11
3.3
BLACK-EYED SUSAN -- RUDBECKIA HIRTA
8
2.3
LANCELEAF COREOPSIS - COREOPSIS LANCEOLATA
8
2.3
SOFT RUSH - JUNCUS EFFUSUS
4
1.1
LITTLE BLUESTEM - SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM
4
1.1
INDIAN GRASS -- SORGHASTRUM NUTANS
4
1.1
EASTERN GAMMA--TRIPSACUM DACTYLOIDES
4
1.1
RYE GRAIN -- SECALE CEREALE
25
7.5
TOTALS
100
30
FERTILIZER-------------------------------------- 750 LBS/ACRE
LIMESTONE-------------------------------------- 2000 LBS/ACRE
FERTILIZER SHALL BE 10-10-10 ANALYSIS. UPON SOIL ANALYSIS
A DIFFERENT RATIO OF FERTILIZER MAY BE USED.
SEEDBED PREPARATION
THE SEEDBED SHALL BE COMPRISED OF LOOSE SOIL AND NOT COMPACTED. THIS MAY
REQUIRE MECHANICAL LOOSENING OF THE SOIL. SOIL AMENDMENTS SHOULD FOLLOW
THE FERTILIZER AND LIMING DESCRIPTION IN THE ABOVE SECTIONS. FOLLOWING SEEDING,
MULCHING SHALL FOLLOW THE BELOW APPLICATION METHODS AND AMOUNTS. AREAS
CONTAINING SEVERE SOIL COMPACTION WILL BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 8 INCHES.
MULCHING
SEEDED AREAS ARE TO BE PROTECTED BY SPREADING STRAW MULCH UNIFORMLY TO
FORM A CONTINUOUS BLANKET (75% COVERAGE = 2 TONS/ACRE).
NOTE: FERTILIZER IS ONLY TO BE APPLIED ONCE. IF TEMPORARY SEED AND FERTILIZER IS
APPLIED PRIOR TO PERMANENT SEED, THEN FERTILIZER SHALL NOT BE APPLIED WITH THE
PERMANENT SEED.
MAJOR ELEMENTS OF DWQ CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT
1) GROUND STABILIZATION
SITE AREA
STABILIZATION
STABILIZATION TIME
DESCRIPTION
TIME FRAME
FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES
7 DAYS
NONE
AND SLOPES
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HQW) ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1,14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED.
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
7 -DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50 FEET
IN LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES
14 DAYS
NONE (EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND
FLATTER THAN 4:1
HQW ZONES)
2) BUILDING WASTES HANDLING
- NO PAINT OR LIQUID WASTES IN STREAM OR STORM DRAINS.
- DEDICATED AREAS FOR DEMOLITION, CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER WASTES MUST BE LOCATED 50' FROM
STORM DRAINS AND STREAMS UNLESS NO REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES AVAILABLE.
- EARTHEN -MATERIAL STOCKPILES MUST BE LOCATED 50' FROM STORM DRAINS AND STREAMS UNLESS NO
REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES AVAILABLE.
- CONCRETE MATERIALS MUST BE CONTROLLED TO AVOID CONTACT WITH SURFACE WATERS, WETLANDS,
OR BUFFERS.
3) DISCHARGES TO FEDERALLY -LISTED WATERS
- REQUIREMENTS ARE THE SAME AS IN PREVIOUS PERMIT.
- THE PERMIT ALLOWS REDUCTION FROM THE 20 ACRE MINIMUM IF THE DIRECTOR OF DWQ DETERMINES THAT
OTHER BMPS PROVIDE EQUIVALENT PROTECTION.
4) INSPECTIONS
- SAME WEEKLY INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS.
- SAME RAIN GAUGE & INSPECTIONS AFTER 0.5" RAIN EVENT.
- INSPECTIONS ARE ONLY REQUIRED DURING "NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS".
- INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE AVAILABLE ON-SITE DURING BUSINESS HOURS UNLESS A SITE-SPECIFIC
EXEMPTION IS APPROVED.
- RECORDS MUST BE KEPT FOR 3 YEARS AND AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
- ELECTRONICALLY -AVAILABLE RECORDS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS.
5) IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW PERMIT CONDITIONS
- PROJECTS PERMITTED UNDER THE PREVIOUS PERMIT CAN CONTINUE TO FOLLOW THE PREVIOUSLY -PERMITTED
CONDITIONS.
- COMPLETE APPLICATIONS RECEIVED PRIOR TO AUGUST 3, 2011 CAN FOLLOW CONDITIONS OF APPROVED
APPLICATION.
- APPLICATIONS RECEIVED AFTER AUGUST 2, 2011 MUST COMPLY WITH NEW PERMIT CONDITIONS.
6) CONDITIONS IN EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLANS*
- DESIGNATION ON THE PLANS WHERE THE 7 AND 14 -DAY GROUND STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES
PERMIT APPLY.
- DESIGNATION ON THE PLANS WHERE BASINS THAT COMPLY WITH THE SURFACE -WITHDRAWAL REQUIREMENTS
OF THE NPDES PERMIT ARE LOCATED.
7) BUILDING WASTES HANDLING
- NO PAINT OR LIQUID WASTES IN STREAM OR STORM DRAINS
- DEDICATED AREAS FOR DEMOLITION, CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER WASTES LOCATED 50' FROM STORM DRAINS
AND STREAMS UNLESS NO REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES ARE AVAILABLE.
- EARTHEN -MATERIAL STOCKPILES LOCATED 50' FROM STORM DRAINS UNLESS NO REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES
AVAILABLE.
- CONCRETE MATERIALS MUST BE CONTROLLED TO AVOID CONTACT WITH SURFACE WATERS, WETLANDS, OR
BUFFERS.
Y
z
Q
m
z
_O
Q
_0
F-
Q
Lu
O7
0 -
Lu
Lu
2
C)
Q
N.T.S.
8) SEDIMENT BASINS EROSION
- OUTLET STRUCTURES MUST WITHDRAW FROM BASIN SURFACE UNLESS DRAINAGE AREA IS LESS THAN 1 ACRE. CONTROL
- USE ONLY DWQ-APPROVED FLOCCULANTS. I PLAN

SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION:
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FOLLOWING THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE PLANS AND THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS, AS DIRECTED BY THE DESIGNER. CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED
IN THE SPECIFIED MANNER UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED OR APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER. THE FOLLOWING
PROVISIONS, ALONG WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS CONTAINED IN THE PLANS, CONSTITUTE THE SEQUENCE OF
CONSTRUCTION.
GENERAL SITE NOTES:
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ONLY CONDUCT STREAM WORK, INCLUDING ALL IN -STREAM STRUCTURES, GRADING,
STABILIZATION MEASURES, AND SEEDING, MULCHING, AND MATTING WORK, ON A SECTION OF STREAM THAT
SHALL BE ENTIRELY COMPLETED WITHIN A SINGLE DAY. EACH SECTION OF COMPLETED STREAM MUST BE
STABILIZED AND MATTED BEFORE FLOW CAN BE RETURNED INTO THE CHANNEL.
2. WHEN WORKING IN STREAMS WITH NO ACTIVE FLOW THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE APPROPRIATELY
SIZED PUMPS AND MATERIALS TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN A TEMPORARY STREAM DIVERSION IN ANTICIPATION
OF PENDING STORM EVENTS. WORKING IN A DRY CHANNEL DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE CONTRACTOR FROM
HAVING TO COMPLY WITH NOTE I ABOVE.
3. UPON APPROVAL FROM THE DESIGNER, PHASES 2 THROUGH 7 MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IN A DIFFERENT
SEQUENCE THAN INDICATED BELOW OR CONCURRENTLY.
4. ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE DONE DURING PERIODS OF DRY WEATHER.
5. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS WILL BE LOCATED IN AREAS OF THE STREAM WHERE LEFT AND RIGHT BANK HEIGHTS
ARE SIMILAR OR CAN BE GRADED TO PROVIDE A LEVEL, OR NEAR LEVEL, CROSSING SURFACE. BRIDGE MATS
CAN BE MADE OF WOOD OR STEEL, BUT MUST BE CAPABLE OFSUPPORTING THE GROUND PRESSURE OF THE
EQUIPMENT THAT WILL BE UTILIZING THE CROSSING. UPON ENSURING A LEVEL CROSSING SURFACE, THE
BRIDGE MATS WILL BE LAID ACROSS THE CHANNEL IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT DISRUPT STREAM FLOW OR
CAUSE EROSION IN THE CHANNEL. THIS IS TYPICALLY ACHIEVED USING AN EXCAVATOR TO LIFT THE MATS
ACROSS THE CHANNEL WITH CHAINS AND GUIDED AND SET BY A GROUND CREW. THE MATS MUST BE
CONTINUOUS ACROSS THE CHANNEL, WITH NO GAPS THAT COULD ALLOW SEDIMENT TO ENTER THE STREAM.
4" WOODEN BARRIERS WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE OUTER EDGE OF THE MATS TO PREVENT SOIL FROM SPILLING
INTO THE CHANNEL DURING CROSSING. ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT ON THE MATS WILL BE REMOVED ON A
FREQUENT BASIS TO MINIMIZE DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENT TO THE STREAM DURING USE. AFTER SETTING THE
BRIDGE MATS, A CLASS 1 STONE APRON WILL BE APPLIED ON THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT OF THE BRIDGE AS PER
THE DETAIL ON SHEET 19 OF THE PLANS. THIS APRON WILL BE MAINTAINED AND REPLACED AS NEEDED TO
MINIMIZE SEDIMENT MOBILIZATION TO THE STREAM. PRIOR TO REMOVING THE CROSSINGS, THE MATS SHOULD
BE CLEANED OF SEDIMENT. SIMILAR TO INSTALLATION, THE MATS SHOULD BE REMOVED USING AN EXCAVATOR
AND CHAINS SO THEY CAN BE LIFTED UP AND OUT OF THE AREA WITHOUT DAMAGING THE STREAM OR ENTERING
THE STREAM FLOW.
6. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
OCCUR. A COPY OF THIS PERMIT AND A HARD COPY OF THE PLAN MUST BE KEPT ON SITE, PREFERABLY IN A
PERMITS BOX, AND ACCESSIBLE DURING INSPECTION.
7. SELF -INSPECTIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE PERFORMED AT LEAST
ONCE EVERY SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF EVERY RAIN EVENT OF GREATER THAN 0.5 INCH.
ANY NEEDED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN MEASURES AS DESIGNED. ALL ESC MEASURES
SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS SPECIFIED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.
8. AFTER SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND PROVIDE PERMANENT
SEEDING WHERE TEMPORARY MEASURES HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND GROUND COVER IS NOT ADEQUATE.
9. PER NPDES REQUIREMENTS, A RAIN GAUGE, SELF -INSPECTIONS RECORDS, PERMIT, AND S&E PLAN ARE
REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AND ACCESSIBLE DURING INSPECTION. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THESE
ITEMS BE PLACED IN A PERMITS BOX AT THE BEGINNING OR ENTRANCE OF PROJECT.
10.CONTACT THE DEMLR WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY [phone].
PHASE 1: INITIAL SITE PREPARATION
A. IDENTIFY PROJECT BOUNDARY, LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, SENSITIVE AREAS, STAGING AREAS,
STABILIZED ENTRANCES, TEMPORARY CROSSINGS AND ACCESS POINTS WITH THE DESIGNER.
B. CONSTRUCT ENTRANCE AND STAGING AREAS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED SEDIMENT AND EROSION
CONTROL DEVICES IN A MANNER TO SUPPORT EXECUTION OF THE RESTORATION IN PHASES AS
INDICATED IN THE PLANS AND AS DIRECTED BY THE DESIGNER.
PHASE 2: STREAM REACH - COOKS CREEK - STA. 10+00 TO 17+18
A. COMPLETE CHANNEL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES:
i. ENSURE THAT ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED
ALONG EXISTING AND NEW CHANNEL AND ARE IN WORKING CONDITION.
ii. ESTABLISH AN ISOLATED WORK AREA BY INSTALLING IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND TEMPORARY
CHANNEL DIVERSION AND DIVERT FLOWS AROUND THE DESIGNATED WORK AREA.
(LENGTH OF ISOLATED WORK AREA IS LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR).
iii. COMPLETE CHANNEL GRADING AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS. INSTALL ANY BANK
STABILIZATION TREATMENTS AND IN -STREAM STRUCTURES.
iv. SEED AND MULCH COMPLETED WORK AREAS AND INSTALL STRAW WATTLES ALONG COMPETED
STREAM BANKS.
PHASE 3: STREAM REACH - TRIBUTARY 1 - STA. 20+00 TO 28+45
A. COMPLETE CHANNEL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES:
i. ENSURE THAT ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED
ALONG EXISTING AND NEW CHANNEL AND ARE IN WORKING CONDITION.
ii. ESTABLISH AN ISOLATED WORK AREA BY INSTALLING IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND TEMPORARY
CHANNEL DIVERSION AND DIVERT FLOWS AROUND THE DESIGNATED WORK AREA.
(LENGTH OF ISOLATED WORK AREA IS LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR).
iii. COMPLETE CHANNEL GRADING AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS. INSTALL ANY BANK
STABILIZATION TREATMENTS AND IN -STREAM STRUCTURES.
iv. SEED AND MULCH COMPLETED WORK AREAS AND INSTALL STRAW WATTLES ALONG COMPETED
STREAM BANKS.
PHASE 4: STREAM REACH - TRIBUTARY 1-1 - STA. 30+00 TO 31+41 AND BMP AREA
A. COMPLETE CHANNEL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES:
i. ENSURE THAT ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED
ALONG EXISTING AND NEW CHANNEL AND ARE IN WORKING CONDITION.
ii. ESTABLISH AN ISOLATED WORK AREA BY INSTALLING IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND TEMPORARY
CHANNEL DIVERSION AND DIVERT FLOWS AROUND THE DESIGNATED WORK AREA.
(LENGTH OF ISOLATED WORK AREA IS LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR).
iii. COMPLETE CHANNEL GRADING AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS. INSTALL ANY BANK
STABILIZATION TREATMENTS AND IN -STREAM STRUCTURES.
iv. SEED AND MULCH COMPLETED WORK AREAS AND INSTALL STRAW WATTLES ALONG COMPETED
STREAM BANKS.
PHASE 5: STREAM REACH - TRIBUTARY 2-1 - STA. 200+00 TO 205+50
A. COMPLETE CHANNEL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES:
L ENSURE THAT ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED
ALONG EXISTING AND NEW CHANNEL AND ARE IN WORKING CONDITION.
ii. ESTABLISH AN ISOLATED WORK AREA BY INSTALLING IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND TEMPORARY
CHANNEL DIVERSION AND DIVERT FLOWS AROUND THE DESIGNATED WORK AREA.
(LENGTH OF ISOLATED WORK AREA IS LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR).
iii. COMPLETE CHANNEL GRADING AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS. INSTALL ANY BANK
STABILIZATION TREATMENTS AND IN -STREAM STRUCTURES.
iv. SEED AND MULCH COMPLETED WORK AREAS AND INSTALL STRAW WATTLES ALONG COMPETED
STREAM BANKS.
PHASE 6: STREAM REACH - TRIBUTARY 2 - STA. 205+50 TO 220+99
A. COMPLETE CHANNEL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES:
i. ENSURE THAT ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED
ALONG EXISTING AND NEW CHANNEL AND ARE IN WORKING CONDITION.
ii. ESTABLISH AN ISOLATED WORK AREA BY INSTALLING IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND TEMPORARY
CHANNEL DIVERSION AND DIVERT FLOWS AROUND THE DESIGNATED WORK AREA.
(LENGTH OF ISOLATED WORK AREA IS LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR).
iii. COMPLETE CHANNEL GRADING AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS. INSTALL ANY BANK
STABILIZATION TREATMENTS AND IN -STREAM STRUCTURES.
iv. SEED AND MULCH COMPLETED WORK AREAS AND INSTALL STRAW WATTLES ALONG COMPETED
STREAM BANKS.
PHASE 7: STREAM REACH - TRIBUTARY 2-2 - STA. 250+00 TO 252+87 AND BMP AREA
A. COMPLETE CHANNEL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES:
i. ENSURE THAT ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED
ALONG EXISTING AND NEW CHANNEL AND ARE IN WORKING CONDITION.
ii. ESTABLISH AN ISOLATED WORK AREA BY INSTALLING IMPERVIOUS DIKES AND TEMPORARY
CHANNEL DIVERSION AND DIVERT FLOWS AROUND THE DESIGNATED WORK AREA.
(LENGTH OF ISOLATED WORK AREA IS LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR).
iii. COMPLETE CHANNEL GRADING AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS. INSTALL ANY BANK
STABILIZATION TREATMENTS AND IN -STREAM STRUCTURES.
iv. SEED AND MULCH COMPLETED WORK AREAS AND INSTALL STRAW WATTLES ALONG COMPETED
STREAM BANKS.
PHASE 8: RIPARIAN BUFFER PLANTING
A. PHASE 8 CAN BE INITIATED AFTER THE STREAM WORK IS COMPLETED IN EACH SECTION
OF THE PROJECT.
B. PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED DURING THE DORMANT SEASON (NOVEMBER 17 - MARCH 17).
C. PREPARE AND PLANT BANK AND RIPARIAN VEGETATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND AS DIRECTED BY THE DESIGNER.
PHASE 9: COMPLETION OF PROJECT SITE
A. REMOVE ALL REMAINING WASTE MATERIALS AND RESTORE THE REMAINING STAGING
AND STOCKPILING AREAS AND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES TO THEIR PRIOR CONDITION.
REMOVE TEMPORARY CROSSINGS AND INSTALL BANK STABILIZATION TREATMENTS,
AND PLANT, SEED AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS. SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED
AREAS UTILIZING THE SEED/MULCH MIXES SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS.
Y
z
Q
CI]
Z Q
_O z
O
Q E
Q
U
2
O
LU
Z
O
U
Lu
W �
_ 07
Q
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN

I
I
2FT.
3 IN.
UTILIZE STABILIZED
I - SILT BAG WITH
o
TH
OUTLET FOR THE
FORTHE
ROCK PAD
DISCHARGE OF
(SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET)
I
CLEAN WATER
I
(SEE DETAIL THIS SHEEN
I1
DEWATERING
IMPERVIOUS DIKE I
; I PUMP
I
I EXISTING
CHANNEL
TEMPORARY
I IMPERVIOUS DIKE
FLEXIBLE HOSE I
I I
I
I I
1
CONTRACTOR
SHALL UTILIZE
I
SANDBAGS WITH POLYPROPYLENE
I
OR OTHER IMPERVIOUS FABRIC.
I
FLOW INLET FOR CLEAN
(SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET)
WATER TO BE RAISED
\ I
EARTH MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE
OFF OF STREAM
USED TO CONSTRUCT THE
I
, ` BOTTOM. THIS MAY
IMPERVIOUS DIKES.
REQUIRE PLACEMENT
OF GRAVEL UNDER
I \
INTAKE.
PUMP -AROUND \`
PUMP \
SEQUENCE OF DEWATERING OPERATIONS
* ANY DEVIATION FROM ABOVE DEWATERING PLAN
WILL REQUIRE DESIGNER APPROVAL.
1. INSTALL SILT BAGS(S) AND ROCK PAD(S) AND STABILIZED OUTLET.
2. INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
3. PLACE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING
OPERATIONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
4. PLACE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING
APPARATUS. DEWATER ENTRAPPED AREA.
5. PERFORM REPAIR WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS.
6. EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE
REMOVAL OF IMPERVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS
DIKES, PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE
(DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKES FIRST).
7. REMOVE SILT BAG(S) AND STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA WITH
SEED AND MULCH.
EXAMPLE OF PUMP -AROUND OPERATION
SCALE:NTS
STILLING BASIN MAINTENANCE:
1. SEDIMENT BAGS SHALL BE REPLACED AND DISPOSED OF WHEN IT
IS THREE-QUARTERS FULL OF SEDIMENT OR WHEN IT IS IMPRACTICAL
FOR THE BAG TO FILTER THE SEDIMENT OUT ATA REASONABLE
FLOW RATE.
2. ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHOULD BE DISPOSED OF IN A DESIGNATED
DISPOSAL AREA.
3. SPENT BAGS SHOULD BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND NOT BURIED.
4. GRAVEL PADS SHOULD BE CHECKED DAILY DURING USE TO ENSURE THAT
GRAVEL HAS NOT BEEN WASHED AWAY OR BEEN CHOKED BY EXCESSIVE
SEDIMENTATION.
5. REPLACE PAD WITH CLEAN GRAVEL, AS NEEDED.
NOTE. PROVIDE STABILIZED OUTLET DOWN BANK TO STREAM
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN (SILT BAG) WITH ROCK PAD
SCALE:NTS
FILTER
FABRIC WIDTH
2.�
(SEE TABLE BELOW)
O O
8" DEPTH
CLASS B STONE (DIA?5" TO 12")
IMPERVIOUS
SHEETING
SAND BAGS
PUMP SIZE OUTLET WIDTH
2 IN.
2FT.
3 IN.
3FT.
4 IN.
4FT.
6 IN.
6FT.
STABILIZED OUTLET MAINTENANCE:
1. ROCK OUTLETS SHOULD BE CHECKED DAILY DURING USE TO
ENSURE THAT STONE AND FILTER FABRIC HAS NOT BEEN
WASHED AWAY.
2. REPLACE PAD WITH CLEAN STONE, AS NEEDED.
STABILIZED OUTLET FOR PUMP -AROUND SETUP
SCALE:NTS
AJ
PLAN
1
D
3
D
x
SAND IMPERVIOUS
BAGS SHEETING
FLOW
STREAMBED
WRAP SHEETING
UNDER DIKE MATERIAL
SECTION AA
NOT TO SCALE
IMPERVIOUS DIKE DETAIL
SCALE: NTS
NOTES:
DIKE MATERIAL SHALL BE LARGE SANDBAGS
DIKE MATERIAL MAY NOT BE EARTH OR DIRT
DIKE MATERIAL MUST CONFORM TO THE SHAPE
OF THE STREAM CHANNEL AND MUST BE HIGH
ENOUGH IN THE CHANNEL TO NOT ALLOW
FLOW TO OVERTOP THE DIKE.
IMPERVIOUS SHEETING SHOULD BE PLASTIC OR
RUBBER SHEETING THICK ENOUGH TO NOT BE
EASILY PUNCTURED GIVEN THE CONDITIONS OF
THE CHANNEL.
ROCKS, SANDBAGS, OR OTHER WEIGHTS (NOT
DIRT OR EARTH) MAY BE USED TO WEIGH DOWN
THE SHEETING TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS PROPER
CONTACT BETWEEN THE SHEETING AND THE BANKS
AND BED OF THE CHANNEL.
Y
z
Q
in
z
0
H
Q
0
c�
G
Q
LLl
a_
LLl
LLl
Q
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN

�} �, �/ �(�/STOCKPILED
/X T Xi`/`�'��y�xY"��} �Y X} X EARTH
x7iy x��s 'x
SILT FENCE
SF
---___--190---__
NOTES:
TEMPORARY SEEDING MUST BE APPLIED TO STOCKPILES IF NOT
RELOCATED WITHIN 7 DAYS.
ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED DOWN GRADIENT OF ALL STOCK-
PILES.
STOCKPILE LOCATIONS DEPICTED ON SITE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE
AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DEPENDING ON THE AREA THAT IS BEING
WORKED UPON. EXACT LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF STOCKPILES WILL
BE DETERMINED BY DESIGN REPRESENTATIVE IN THE FIELD.
TEMPORARY STOCKPILE DETAIL
SCALE:NTS
V MAX.
METAL POST --------y 123¢ GAUGE MIN.
(1.33 lb PER MIDDLE AND VERTICAL WIRES
LINEAR FOOT) Al
10 GAUGE MIN.
TOP AND BOTTOM
STRAND
WIRE
II
FILTER FABRIC
FILTER FABRIC
COMPACTED FII
SILT FENCE MAINTENANCE _III_
I
1. INSPECT SEDIMENT FENCES WEEKLY
AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT.
EXTENSION OF
L
2. SHOULD FABRIC TEAR, DECOMPOSE, OR IN
FABRIC AND
ANY WAY BECOME INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE
WIRE INTO TRENCH
IT IMMEDIATELY.
(SOLID DECK)
3. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS PROMPTLY TO
PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE
NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE
FENCE. TAKE CARE TO AVOID UNDERMINING
FENCE DURING CLEANOUT.
4. REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND
INSTALL 4"z4"'LIP'
UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AFTER THE
ALONG BOTH SIDES
CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN
OF BRIDGE MAT
PROPERLY STABILIZED, INSPECTED AND
APPROVED. BRING THE DISTURBED AREA TO
GRADE AND STABILIZE AS SHOWN IN THE
VEGETATION PLAN.
SILT FENCE DETAIL
SCALE:NTS
Z-0" DEPTH
I
12" STRAW
WATTLE
-----Wbkf ----
WOODEN STAKE SOW 3" TRENCH OR
18"zi"x2" BACKFILL UPSTREAM
SIDE WITH MULCH
NOTES:
WATTLES SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURERS
SPECIFICATIONS.
WATTLES SHALL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE TOP OF NEW CHANNEL BANKS.
ALL WADDLE JUNCTIONS SHALL BE OVERLAPPED AND STAKED TO ENSURE
CONTINUOUS PROTECTION ALONG STREAM BANKS.
STAKES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG WADDLES AT 5 FEET SPACING.
STRAW WATTLE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
C
(OVER FILTER FABRIC)
NOTES:
1. TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE LARGE
TRUCKS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
2. ENTRANCE(S) SHOULD BE LOCATED TO PROVIDE FOR UTILIZATION
BY ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES.
3. MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT
TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF MUD ONTO STREETS. PERIODIC
TOP DRESSING WITH STONE WILL BE NECESSARY.
4. ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY MUST BE CLEANED
UP IMMEDIATELY.
5. GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE LOCATED AT ALL
POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED.
FREQUENT CHECKS OF THE DEVICE AND TIMELY MAINTENANCE
MUST BE PROVIDED.
51AbiLIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL
SCALE:NTS
STREAM CROSSING MAINTENANCE: A]
1. INSPECT TEMPORARY CROSSING
AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT FOR
ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS,
BLOCKAGE, EROSION OF ABUTMENTSBRIDGE
LL
MAT
AND OVERFLOW AREAS, CHANNEL
(SOLID DECK)
SCOUR, RIPRAP DISPLACEMENT, OR
PIPING ALONG CULVERTS. —SFJ
2. REMOVE DEBRIS, REPAIR AND
REINFORCE DAMAGED AREAS SFS
IMMEDIATELY TO PREVENT FURTHER
DAMAGE TO THE INSTALLATION.
FLOW
INSTALL 4"z4"'LIP'
INSTALL4"xf-LIP' -sF�
ALONG BOTH SIDES
ALONG BOTH SIDESFsF\
OF BRIDGE MAT
OF BRIDGE MAT
EXISTING
CHANNEL
FILTER FABRIC
FOR DRAINAGE
CLASS"1"STONE
SECTION AA q
FORAPPROACH
NOT TO SCALE
STABILIZATION
PLAN
1. BRIDGE LOCATIONS DEPICTED ON SITE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND
ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DEPENDING ON THE AREA THAT IS BEING
WORKED UPON. EXACT LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF STOCK PILES
WILL BE DETERMINED BY DESIGN REPRESENTATIVE IN THE FIELD.
2. WIDTH OF EACH MAT IS DEPENDENT ON THE SIZE OF THE EQUIPMENT
MEANT TO CROSS IT.
3. APPROACH STABILIZATION, COMPOSED OF CLASS 1 STONE, WILL BE
REQUIRED FOR EACH SECTION OF THE BRIDGE.
4. BRIDGE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF A SOLID DECK.
TEMPORARY BRIDGE MAT CROSSING
0)w
Y
z
Q
m
z
_O
rQ
V
cG
G
Q
Lu
(L
U)
0—
Lu
Lu
Uv
(L
Q
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN

R'D6E RD
PANE �
I
STABILIZED
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
M
164
N/F
DAVID YANCEY NICHOLS
LIFE ESTATE
PIN 499902873918
DB 1362 PC 325
R/W
/NjERST —
� TE 74
TEMPORARY
STAGING
AREA
TEMPORARY EARTHEN
ACCESS DRIVE
0
NAF
ROBERT EDGAR SMITH ✓R
PIN 499900887042
D8 1362 PC 309
TEMPORARY STOCK PILE; TYP. -
EXACT LOCATION AND QUANTITY
TO BE DETERMINED BY DESIGN
REPRESENTATIVE IN THE FIELD.
0
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE = 13.30 ACRES
OTEMPORARY
�° STAGING
AREA
OD
{
a� VV _ W
OD
LOD
EXISTING -_-___-
WETLAND 'WD'
R
TEMPORARY BRIDGE MAT
STREAM CROSSING. EXACT
LOCATION AND QUANTITY
OF CROSSINGS WILL BE -R/W
DETERMINED BY DESIGN
REPRESENTATIVE IN THE
FIELD.
0
R
EXAMPLE OF PUMP AROUND OPERATION
EXACT LOCATION AND SETUP WILL BE
TCD DETERMINED BY HOW MUCH WORK THE
CONTRACTOR PLANS TO COMPLETE AT
THE TIME. (SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 18).
= s -
KNEE P-l�•r
�IAEL ►�'.,l
m
290 O,9
�tQ
-80'-40' 0' 80' 160'
N
�z Z
0
0
v
o
W N
r
7N
i
o wJ
co
in
GRAPHIC SCALE
0
�w
yU
¢ Z
�F
3
Z 0
0 z
0
N
Lu
1n =
J
w
0
Lu
.
W
ii
i
Z Q
O z
F J
Q
C7 Q
F U
2
� �o
LU
Z
/ O
U
D_ r
Lu Of
OfW
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN

aJ
&-1
/NTE.S'STgTE 7�
------------------
STABILIZED
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
NIF
-NN & GLENDA
NICHOLS v s -
49990666105 CEJ
1265 PG 372 1 I�
TEMPORARY
STAGING
AREA
I
I +z9r
:11iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN:
x� v�
7f1//L'////////!Illi 1,.,
�;
EXISTI
WETLA
NIF
GLENN INICHOLS //////// j/// _'
PIN 499900764767 I l ✓,��-�'��
DB 445 PG 1512
0
O
TEMPORARY EARTHEN INCOMING DRAINAGE TO BE
ACCESS DRIVE STABILIZED USING EXCESS
C7 FROM STREAM GRADING.
SEED AND MULCH ALL DIST
AREAS.
N/F
TREMA NICHOLS SMI
TEMPORARY r0 PIN 4999028656
STAGING o DB 1362 PG 32
AREA
\ EXISTING o
WETLAND'WA'
— —_- °o
AG
_11 —
+
- -
_ —�� VAAAAACA�VAVA�
CUT
URBED
TH
21
s
EXISTING
WETLAND 'WB'
-LOD-
N/F
S&T NICHOLS
PROPERTIES LLC
PIN 499900767381
DH 1286 PG 131
oo
N/F
BRADLEY MOSLEY
PIN 499900766011
DB 621 PG 898
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE = 13.30 ACRES
t
Q
90 �9
-80'-40' 0' 80' 160'
i I i
GRAPHIC SCALE
N/F
BRIAN & MARI SEAL
PIN 499900985965
DB 1508 PG 537
TEMPORARY STOCKPILE, TYP. —
EXACT LOCATION AND QUANTITY
TO BE DETERMINED BY DESIGN
REPRESENTATIVE IN THE FIELD.
TEMPORARY
STAGING
AREA
v
vv—
EXISTING
WETLAND'WC'
a
Is
0
N/F
BRIAN & MARI SEAL
PIN 499900955107
DB 1517 PG 828
a
N
Z
a
N
`ate
Ln w�
ISI
z Z E
w ma
tc 0
n W�wU a z mm
J w Zo
a wz
0
w J
w Q J
CO oz
w v
Y
Z
00
Z a
O z
J
� U
O
W
Z
U) O
U
0- }
LU
W
2 co
U)
Q
2
'DATE:DECEMBER 2018
scALE:
GRAPHIC
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN

12.2 Data Analysis/Supplemental Information and Maps
Existing Conditions Cross -Sections and Map
Sediment Sampling (Pebble Counts and Pavement Samples)
Stream Morphological Tables
Buffer Analysis Maps and Table
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

w
XIS-A
.�I
� Reference XS -A
Project Easement (12.4 ac)
Intermittent Streams
Perrenial Streams
Existing Wetlands
Cross -Sections
0 150 300
Feet
EXISTING CONDITIONS CROSS-SECTIONS A
N
HAIR SHEEP STREAM MITIGATION BANK Source: NCOneMap
SURRY COUNTY, NC Orthoimagery, 2014.

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Site:
Hair Sheep
_
XS ID
CC Reference XSA
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.05
b
Date:
6/25/2018
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelinger, A. Rosso
---� Banldnll Site Assessment
Station
Elevation
SUMMARY DATA
0.00
97.01
Current Banktull Elevation:
94.11
3.56
96.65
Banktull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.9
=
6.33
96.05
Banktull Width:
4.7
7.43
95.58
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
94.8
8.30
95.06
Flood Prone Width:
12.2
-
9.72
94.61
Max Depth at Banktull:
0.7
10.28
94.23
Mean Depth at Banktull:
0.6
10.60
93.52
W / D Ratio:
7.4
10.90
93.43
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.6
11.44
93.40
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
12.48
93.40
14.11
93.47
14.67
93.54
15.03
94.14
Hair Sheep, CC Reference XSA
15.60
94.21
98
15.82
94.32
17.24
94.44
18.82
94.37
97
19.91
94.54
21.59
94.91
23.98
95.66
96
25.85
95.70
31.30
95.51
0
95
c
W
93
0 5
10
15
20 25 30 35 40
Station (feet)
---� Banldnll Site Assessment

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin: IYadkin
Site: I Hair Sheep
XS ID IT2 Reference XSA
0.00 96.61
3.36 96.36
5.77 1 96.19
11.25 1 94.61
11.76
94.15
12.51
93.67
13.26
93.64
14.05
93.61
20.49 95.17
23.23 95.97
25.99 96.82
SUMMARY DATA
Current Bankfull Elevation:
94.43
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.0
Bankfull Width:
3.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
95.3
Flood Prone Width:
11.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
6.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Hair Sheep, T2 Reference XSA
97
96
w
95
0
c
W
94
93 ; I I i I I I
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Station(feet)
---
Bankfull Site Assessment

River Basin: IYadkin
Site: I Hair Sheep
XS ID IT2 Reference XSB
2.41 99.67
5.46 99.56
6.15 99.23
11.58 1 98.18
12.18
98.37
13.07
97.60
13.65
97.29
14.52
97.16
17.56 98.78
18.91 99.21
20.80 99.25
22.79 98.98
Cross -Section Plots
SUMMARY DATA
Current Bankfull Elevation:
98.22
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.9
Bankfull Width:
5.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
99.3
Flood Prone Width:
19.1
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
W / D Ratio:
10.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
14
y
r
Hair Sheep, T2 Reference XSB
100
99
w
m
------------------------------- ----------------------------------
c 98
W
97
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Station(feet)
---�
Bankfull Site Assessment

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Site:
Hair Sheep
XS ID
CC XSA
1
:k-•{
Drainage Area (sq mi):
AL
0.05
Date:
6/25/2018
Site Assessment
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelinger, A. Rosso
Station
Elevation
SUMMARY DATA
0.00
99.89
Current Bankfull Elevation:
96.25
8.15
99.94
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.5
11.74
99.83
Bankfull Width:
6.3
13.41
99.59
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
96.9
15.43
98.69
Flood Prone Width:
8.5
16.88
97.32
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
18.42
96.30
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
20.10
96.12
W / D Ratio:
16.3
20.81
95.78
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.3
22.37
95.63
Bank Height Ratio:
5.0
23.51
95.65
24.87
95.97
27.23
97.73
29.08
99.40
Hair Sheep, CC XSA
31.10
101.46
105
31.70
102.10
34.21
102.80
37.29
103.09
103
101
w
m
0
99
c
z
W
97 - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f
95
0
5
10
15
20 25 30 35 40
Station (feet)
---� BBankfull
Site Assessment

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Current Bankfull Elevation:
90.19
Yadkin
4.1
Bankfull Width:
7.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
91.2
Flood Prone Width:
19.5
Site:
1.0
Mean at Bankfull:
Hair Sheep
W / D Ratio:
15.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.5
Bank Height Ratio:
0.9
XS ID
CC XSB
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.09
---� Banldall Site Assessment
Date:
6/25/2018
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelinger, A. Rosso
:wx�
Station
Elevation
0.00
93.21
:z4;'r
- •."
3.13
92.34
A
c
4.53
91.70_
5.87
90.64
9.65
13.02
90.20
90.32Depth
16.77
90.13Depth
18.07
90.06
18.87
89.76
=
20.06
89.42
-
20.79
89.40
21.31
89.23
22.23
89.34
22.88
89.24
Hair Sheep, CC XSB
23.43
89.19
94
23.59
91.10
24.41
91.14
26.98
91.51
93
31.56
91.74
92
w
0
91
W
90
89
0
5
10
15
20
25 30
35
40
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Current Bankfull Elevation:
90.19
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
4.1
Bankfull Width:
7.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
91.2
Flood Prone Width:
19.5
Max at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean at Bankfull:
0.5
W / D Ratio:
15.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.5
Bank Height Ratio:
0.9
---� Banldall Site Assessment

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Hair Sheep,.--
T1 XSA
0.04
6/25/2018
A. French, T. Seelinger, A. Rosso
SUMMARY DATA Current Bankfull Elevation:
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
102
97.84
2.3
4.6
98.8
6.3
1.
0.
1.4
2.2
;y,_.
e `• '
.r
r ,t
` ' y
Hair Sheep, Tl XSA
'
Site:
XS ID
Drainage Area (sq mi):
Date:
Field Crew:
W / D Ratio:
Station Elevation
0.00 100.99
9.28 100.37
14.21 99.41
19.54 99.18
22.04 99.06
23.66 99.19
25.92 99.23
28.53 99.13
29.92 98.97
30.28 98.88
30.93 98.27
31.59 97.87
32.15 97.54
32.64 97.38
33.19 97.08
33.74 97.01
34.09 96.88
34.33 96.86
101
100
34.56 97.18
34.77 97.42
35.72 97.48
w
35.90 97.80
36.18 97.65
99
0
36.95 99.53
37.53 99.80
38.43 100.04
W
39.52 100.14
41.52 100.15
97
96
45.52 99.92
49.83 99.84
55.58 99.63
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
0
5
W / D Ratio:
9.2
---� Banldnll
Site Assessment

River Basin: IYadkin
Site: I Hair Sheep
XS ID IT1 XSB
1 5.10 1 10101.036 �.
7.79 19
19.97 100.78
21.46
100.49
21.97
100.23
22.42
100.29
22.82
99.53
24.67 98.44
25.61
98.58
25.86
98.79
26.21
99.09
26.70
99.99
32.16 100.43
35.15 100.79
36.75 100.89
38.10 101.28
Cross -Section Plots
SUMMARY DATA
Current Bankfull Elevation:
99.43
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.3
Bankfull Width:
3.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
100.4
Flood Prone Width:
10.4
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
M16
Bank Hei ht Ratio:
Hair Sheep, T1 XSB
102
101
w
100
----------------------------------------- ----- ------------------------------0
W
99
98
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station(feet)
---�
Bankfull Site Assessment

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin: Yadkin
Site: Hair Sheep
XS ID T2 XSA
Drainage Area (sq mi): AL 0.06
Date: 6/25/2018 - r'
Field Crew: A. French, T. Seelinger, A. Rosso
Station Elevation
1 ,
0.00 98.42
3.74 98.24
v
7.74 98.07 •'; - s�
9.47 98.05
10.47 95.10
11.41 94.94Depth
12.29 94.70Depth
13.22 94.74 �u_�
14.18 95.06 }L '#li`' 1i �
.,�.� e.t. tii
14.92 95.52 - L,
16.20 96.02
18.08 96.19
19.89 96.44
22.55 96.13
24.24 96.15
26.47 97.13
30.03 97.59--------------------------- \ -------- -------------------------------------
Hair Sheep, T2 XSA
100
99
98
w
97
0
.� 96
W
95
94
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Current Bankfull Elevation:
95.59
Banktull Cross -Sectional Area:
3.0
Bankfull Width:
4.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
96.5
Flood Prone Width:
15.0
Max at Bankfull:
0.9
Mean at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
7.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.1
Bank Height Ratio:
1.5
---� Banldall Site Assessment

River Basin: IYadkin
Site: I Hair Sheep
XS ID I T2 XSB
7.96 98.50
13.01 1 95.83
13.75
97.01
14.93
96.97
15.75
97.07
16.45
97.60
21.17 94.55
22.75 94.51
23.84 94.60
24.64 94.83
28.96 94.94
29.82
95.81
31.82
96.03
34.52
96.06
38.43
96.51
Cross -Section Plots
SUMMARY DATA
Current Bankfull Elevation:
95.35
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
4.0
Bankfull Width:
7.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
96.2
Flood Prone Width:
19.6
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
12.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.5
Hair Sheep, T2 XSB
100
99
98
w
97
0
96
95
94
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station(feet)
_ _ _
Bankfull Site Assessment

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Site:
Hair Sheep
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.4
XS ID
T2 XSC
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.11
_
+..
}
Date:
6/25/2018
r;
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelinger, A. Rosso
Station
ElevationSUMMARY
DATA
0.00
99.92
Current Bankfull Elevation:
93.70
"'t
_x ;•
_
k'-.
1.59
99.59
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
3.9
3.73
99.50
Bankfull Width:
5.2
�.:
5.73
99.01
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
94.8
7.26
98.60
Flood Prone Width:
7.4
8.90
97.86
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
z•�h�y-y
10.31
97.41
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
5'
12.45
95.74
W D Ratio:
6.9
c.
syr'
13.55
94.48
14.69
93.03
Bank Height Ratio:
2.1
"!
15.27
92.97
15.97
92.88
16.74
92.64
17.87
92.80
Hair Sheep, T2 XSC
18.64
92.89
102
19.48
93.83
20.85
94.88
22.30
95.44
100
22.83
95.49
23.97
95.59
26.44
95.71
98
29.70
95.92
0
96
c
W
94
92 [
I I I I I
i
i
i
i
I
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Station (feet)
---� Bankfull
/
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.4
Site Assessment

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Site:
Hair Sheep
XS ID
T2 XSD
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.13
Date:
6/25/2018
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelinger, A. Rosso
Station
Elevation
SUMMARY DATA
0.00
97.68
Current Bankfull Elevation:
90.68
4.1
4.04
97.63
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
6.42
97.12
Bankfull Width:
6.2
10.06
95.83
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
91.6
14.55
94.50
Flood Prone Width:
9.5
16.15
94.13
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
16.85
92.38
Mean Depth at Ba kfull:
0.7
17.87
91.50
W / D Ratio:
9.5
19.19
91.06
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.5
4.
20.73
90.93
Bank Height Ratio:
1.3
21.16
90.45
21.54
90.13
23.02
89.78
24.15
89.88
Hair Sheep, T2 XSD
24.93
89.80
99
26.14
90.12
27.15
90.54
27.40
92.57
97
29.38
92.90
32.25
94.22
34.30
95.13
95
37.17
96.14
42.31
96.46
48.51
97.84
93
91 - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
89
0
10
20
30
40
50
Station (feet)
Bankfull
Site Assessment

Cross -Section Plots
SUMMARY DATA
Current Bankfull Elevation:
97.64
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
1.3
Bankfull Width:
3.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
98.0
Flood Prone Width:
4.4
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.3
W / D Ratio:
11.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.1
Bank Height Ratio:
8.0
Hair Sheep, T2-1 XSA
103
102
101
w
100
0
c 99
W
98
97
0 5 10 15 20 25
Station(feet)
---� Bankfull Site Assessment

Cross -Section Plots
River Basin:
Yadkin
Site:
Hair Sheep
-,
XS ID
T2-2 XSA=
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.02
x
�^
Date:
6/25/2018
.a
Field Crew:
A. French, T. Seelinger, A. Rosso
.vim.
Station
ElevationSUMMARY
DATA
=E
0.00
101.33
Current Bankfull Elevation:
98.77
3.49
101.29
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
1.5
6.85
101.29
Bankfull Width:
5.0
8.30
99.45
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
99.2
-
9.55
98.60
Flood Prone Width:
6.3
10.59 1
98.52
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
11.66
98.29
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.3
13.03
98.46
W / D Ratio:
17.4
14.09
98.56
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.3
15.80
99.98
Bank Height Ratio:
6.1
s
17.69
101.22
21.46
101.40
24.52
101.01
27.58
100.75
Hair Sheep, T2-2 XSA
102
101
w
100
0
c
�
99
W
98
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Station (feet)
---� Bankfull
Site Assessment

Cook's Creek Reference Cross-section A
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Hep
Cook's Creek Reference XSA
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S 3
Fine .125-.25 A 5
Medium .25-.50 N 3
Coarse
.50-1
D
4
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 1
Very Fine
2 - 4
14
80%
E
Z?
60%
0 site
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
Medium
8- 11.3
A
6
G,
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
12
a 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 5
Very Coarse
32-45
S
8
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 10
Small 64-90 C 9
Small 90-128 O 13
Large 128-180 B 7
Large 180-256 L 3
Small
Small
256-362
362-512
B
L
2
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
1.8
20
40
70
130
260
Size Distribution
mean 15.3
dispersion 12.7
skewness -0.31
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
16%
46%
32%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D 3
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 99
Note:

T2 Reference Cross-section A
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Hairsheep
T2 Reference XSA
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 7
Very Fine .062-.125 S 1
Fine .125-.25 A 7
Medium .25-.50 N 14
Coarse
.50-1
D
5
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 4
Very Fine
2 - 4
6
80%
E
Z?
60%
site
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 4
Medium
8- 11.3
A
6
G,
H
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 8
Coarse
16-22.6
E
19
a 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6
Very Coarse
32-45
S 1
6
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 2
Small 64-90 C
Small 90-128 O 3
Large 128-180 B 1
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.26
1.2
8.4
17
25
54
Size Distribution
mean 2.5
dispersion 17.6
skewness -0.37
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
7%
31%
58%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

T2 Reference Cross-section B
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Hairsheep
T2 Reference XSB
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 5
Very Fine .062-.125 S 1
Fine .125-.25 A 3
Medium .25-.50 N 1 1
Coarse
.50-1
D
13
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S2
Very Fine
2 - 4
8
80%
E
Z?
60%
0 site
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R 2
Medium
8- 11.3
A
3
G,
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 11
Coarse
16-22.6
E
10
a 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 8
VeryCoarse
32-45
S
6
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 4
Small 64-90 C 5
Small 90-128 O 3
Large 128-180 B 5
Large 180-256 L 2
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.4
2.1
12
20
57
150
Size Distribution
mean 4.8
dispersion 17.4
skewness -0.27
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
5%
29%
51%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 102
Note:

Cook's Creek Cross-section A
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Hairsheep
Cook's Creek XSA
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 1
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 5
Medium .25-.50 N 7
Coarse
.50-1
D
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 1
Very Fine
2 - 4
80%
E
Z?
60%
site
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 G 2
Fine 5.7-8 R 3
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
5
G,
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 5
Coarse
16-22.6
E
12
a 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 17
Very Coarse
32-45
S
7
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 12
Small 64-90 C 5
Small 90-128 O 10
Large 128-180 B 2
Large 180-256 L 5
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
5.8
19
27
44
94
180
Size Distribution
mean 23.3
dispersion 4.1
skewness -0.06
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
1%
13%
64%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 99
Note:

Cook's Creek Cross-section B
100%
Particle Size Distribution
s e
Cook's Creek XSB
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S 1
Fine .125-.25 A 5
Medium .25-.50 N 1
Coarse
.50-1
D
7
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 4
Very Fine
2 - 4
4
80%
Z?
60%
0 site
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 G 6E
Fine 5.7-8 R 4
Medium
8- 11.3
A
9
G,
H
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 8
Coarse
16-22.6
E
7
a 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 5
Very Coarse
32-45
S
10
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 15
Small 64-90 C 11
Small 90-128 O 5
Large 128-180 B 2
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
1.4
11
22
45
72
120
Size Distribution
mean 10.0
dispersion 9.5
skewness -0.26
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
18%
62%
18%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L 2
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Tl Cross-section A
100%
Particle Size Distribution
HT1rXSA�
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-50 .50 N 4
Coarse
.50- 1
D
16
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 14
Very Fine
2 - 4
6
80%
E
60%
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 G 2
Fine 5.7-8 R 7
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
15
G,
H
Medium 11.3- 16 V 8
Coarse 16-22.6
E
9
a 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 12
Very Coarse
32-45
S
7
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 2
Small 64-90 C 2
Small 90-128 O
Large 128-180 B 1
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362
B
Size
D 1 6
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.87
2.7
8.6
13
28
44
Size Distribution
mean 4.9
dispersion 6.6
skewness -0.20
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
32%
65%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 105
Note:

T1 Cross-section B
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Hairsheep
Tl XSB
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 1
Very Fine .062-.125 S 1
Fine .125-.25 A 2
Medium .25-.50 N 3
Coarse
.50-1
D
7
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 9
Very Fine
2 - 4
2
80%
E
Z?
60%
site
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 2
Medium
8- 11.3
A
5
G,
H
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 6
Coarse
16-22.6
E
8
a 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 9
Very Coarse
32-45
S
11
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 10
Small 64-90 C 11
Small 90-128 O 4
Large 128-180 B 5
Large 180-256 L 3
Small
256-362
B
Size
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
1.2
12
25
42
80
160
Size Distribution
mean 9.8
dispersion 12.0
skewness -0.30
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
1%
22%
54%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 LD16
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

T2 Cross-section A
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Hairsheep
T2 XSA
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 13
Very Fine .062-.125 S 2
Fine .125-.25 A 6
Medium .25-.50 N 2
Coarse
.50-1
D
3
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 7
Very Fine
2 - 4
5
80%
E
Z?
60%
0 site
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 2
Medium
8- 11.3
A
3
G,
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
6
a 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 6
Very Coarse
32-45
S
4
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 9
Small 64-90 C 12
Small 90-128 O 11
Large 128-180 B 6
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.14
2.6
20
51
93
140
Size Distribution
mean 3.6
dispersion 73.8
skewness -0.44
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
13%
20%
38%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

T2 Cross-section B
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Hairsheep
T2 XSB
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 23
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 6
Medium .25-.50 N 17
Coarse .50-1 D 18
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 5
Very Fine
2 - 4
12
80%
a
Z?
60%
site
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
6
C
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 1
Coarse
16-22.6
E
5
a 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 1
Very Coarse
32-45
S
1
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 4
Small 64-90 C
Small 90-128 O
Large 128-180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small
Small
Medium
256-362
362-512
512-1024
B
L
D
1
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.062
0.32
0.59
1.3
9.3
44
Size Distribution
mean 0.8
dispersion 12.6
skewness 0.07
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
23%
46%
31%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 101
Note:

T2 Cross-section C
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Hairsheep
T2 XSC
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 2
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 6
Medium .25-.50 N 7
Coarse
.50-1
D
12
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 8
Very Fine
2 - 4
1
80%
Z?
60%
site
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 GE
Fine 5.7-8 R 2
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
11
G,
H
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 8
Coarse
16-22.6
E
12
a 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 11
Very Coarse
32-45
S
6
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 14
Small 64-90 C 6
Small 90-128 O 8
Large 128-180 B 12
Large 180-256 L 6
Small
256-362
B
1
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.72
10
21
46
120
180
Size Distribution
mean 9.3
dispersion 17.4
skewness -0.24
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
woo et
artificial
2%
25%
49%
24%
1%
0%
0%
0%
00
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 133
Note:

T2 Cross-section D
100%
Particle Size Distribution
HT2rXSD�
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S 6
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 3
Coarse
.50-1
D
1
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 4or
Very Fine
2 - 4
9
80%
E
Q 60%
site
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R 3
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
6
G,
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 4
Coarse
16-22.6
E
10
a 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 12
Very Coarse
32-45
S
17
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 8
Small 64-90 C 11
Small 90-128 O 5
Large 128-180 B 4
Large 180-256 L 2
Small
256-362
B
1
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
2.5
17
27
40
77
150
Size Distribution
mean 13.9
dispersion 6.8
skewness -0.24
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
13%
65%
21%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 106
Note:

T2-1 Cross-section A
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Hairsheep
T2-1 XSA
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 9
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-50 .50 N 3
Coarse
.50- 1
D
2
Very Coarse 1 -2 S
Very Fine
2 - 4
2
80%
E
Z?
60%
0 site
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R 2
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
1
G,
Medium 11.3- 16 V 1
Coarse
16-22.6
E
5
a 40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L 7
Very Coarse
32-45
S
7
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 14
Small 64-90 C 14
Small 90-128 O 18
Large 128-180 B 11
Large 180-256 L 2
Small
256-362
B
2
Size (mm)
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
6
37
59
86
130
170
Size Distribution
mean 27.9
dispersion 6.0
skewness -0.28
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
9%
5%
39%
45%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

T2-2 Cross-section A
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Hairsheep
T2-2 XSA
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 4
Very Fine .062-.125 S 20
Fine .125-.25 A 40
Medium .25-.50 N 24
Coarse
.50-1
D
9
4
VeryCoarse 1 - 2 S
Very Fine
2 - 4
4
80%
E
Z?
60%
site
Assessment
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
1
G,
Medium 11.3- 16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
40%
w
e
Coarse 22.6-32 L
VeryCoarse
32-45
S
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64
Small 64-90 C 1
Small 90-128 O 2
Large 128-180 B 1
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.098
0.16
0.21
0.29
0.54
3.8
Size Distribution
mean 0.2
dispersion 2.4
skewness 0.05
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
4%
88%
5%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Small 362-512 L
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 106
Note:

M
11
Smallest Sieve
Passed (mm)
Weight
(oz)
% Item
Percent
Finer Than
<1
0.65
5.7%
5.7%
1.0
1.8
15.9%
21.6%
2.0
0.7
6.0%
27.6%
4.0
0.9 1
7.6%
35.2%
8.0
1.5
13.4%
48.7%
16.0
2.3
19.9%
68.6%
31.5
3.1
26.9%
95.5%
63.0
0.5
4.5%
100.0%
jr-Total:
1 11.4 1
100
Stream:
Watershed:
Location:
Bar Sample Sieve Analysis
100%
ICobbles
Boulders Bedrock
i I T I I I ,
90%
80%
70%
Cr-
ii ii
60%
(D
50%
ILL
40%
(D
2
30%
ii l ii
IL
20%
10%
0%
0.1 1
10 100
1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
ICumulative Percent ♦ II Item
percent less than (mm)
Percent by
substrate type
D16
Fi;;Size
D35 D50 D84
D95
silt/clay sand
gravel cobble boulder bedrock
3.9
3.9 8.4 23.6
31.1
0
[� % 28%
72% 0%

M
11
Smallest Sieve
Passed (mm)
Weight
(oz)
% Item
Percent
Finer Than
<1
0.65
5.3%
5.3%
1.0
1.4
11.4%
16.7%
2.0
0.5
4.4%
21.1%
4.0
0.7 1
5.6%
26.7%
8.0
1.1
9.1%
35.8%
16.0
1.6
13.3%
49.1%
31.5
2.2
18.1%
67.2%
63.0
4.0
32.8%
100.0%
IF -Total -.1
12.2 1
100
Stream:
Watershed:
Location:
Bar Sample Sieve Analysis
100%
Cobbles gravels 1 7Boulders
Bedrock
90%
80%
70%
Cr-
ii ii
60%
(D
50%
ILL
40%
230%
IL
20%
10%
t I
I
LL
0%
It
I I I
0.1 1
10 100
1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
ICumulative Percent ♦ II Item
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by
substrate type
D16
E7.
D35 D50 D84
D95
silt/clay sand
gravel cobble boulder bedrock
5
7.5 16.5 44.9
56.7
0
[% 21%
79% 0%

Morpholoqical Criteria
LM A
Existing Channel
T2-1
T2
A
Stable
Design
Ratios
Stable
Design
Ratios
Stable
Design
Ratios
CC-xsA CC-xsB
I
am
T1
Restored Reaches
T2-1 T2-2
T2-xsA
T2-xsB
T2-xsC
Stream Type (Rosgen)
G4, C4b
G4, E4b
-
G3
F5b
E4b, C5, G4, B4
B4
64c
C4
CO
CO
CO
Cob
CO
CO
CO
CO
C4
Drainage Area (miz)
0.09
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.03--0.13
-
-
-
0.05
0.09
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.07
0.13
Bankfull Width (Wbkf) (ft)
6.3, 7.9
4.6, 3.4
3.9
5
4.8, 7.1, 5.2, 6.2
-
-
-
6.2
6.8
4.0
5.4
4.0
4.4
5.4
6.6
7.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (Dbkf) (ft)
0.4, 0.5
0.5, 0.7
0.3
0.3
0.6, 0.6, 0.8, 0.7
-
-
-
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (Abkf) (fe)
2.5, 4.1
2.3, 2.3
1.3
1.5
3.0, 4.0, 3.9, 4.1
-
-
-
3.1
3.6
1.2
2.1
1.2
1.4
2.2
3.3
4.4
Width / Depth Ratio (Wbkf/ Dbkf)
16.3, 15.2
9.2, 5.0
11.3
17.4
7.8, 12.3, 6.9, 9.5
12 -- 18
12 -- 18
10--15
12.3
12.7
13.3
13.8
13.3
13.7
13.1
13.4
13.2
Maximum Depth (dmbkf) (ft)
0.6, 1.0
1.0, 1.0
0.4
0.5
0.9, 0.8, 1.1, 0.9
-
-
-
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.8
0.9
Width of Flood Prone Area (Wfpa) (ft)
8.5, 19.5
6.3, 10.4
4.4
6.3
15.0, 19.6, 7.4, 9.5
-
-
-
18--21
15--20
16--25
12.5
18--32
37--40
39--58
39--52
Entrenchment Ratio (ER)
1.3, 2.5
1.4, 3.1
1.1
1.3
3.1, 2.8, 1.4, 1.5
1.4--2.2
>2.2
>2.2
2.9--3.4
3.8--5.0
3.0--4.6
3.1
4.1--7.3
6.9--7.4
5.9--8.8
5.1 -- 6.8
Sinuosity (stream length/valley length) (K)
1.18
1.07
1.12
1.14
1.31
1.1 -- 1.2
1.1 -- 1.3
1.2--1.4
1.18
n/a
1.07
1.12
1.12
1.14
1.17
1.12
Pool Mean Depth (ft)
*
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
0.9
1.0
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.9
1.1
Riffle Mean Depth (ft) (Dbkf)
0.4, 0.5
0.5, 0.7
0.3
0.3
0.6, 0.6, 0.8, 0.7
-
-
-
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Pool Width (ft)
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
8.6
9.5
5.6
7.5
5.6
6.1
7.5
9.2
10.6
Riffle Width (ft)
6.3, 7.9
4.6, 3.4
3.9
5
4.8, 7.1, 5.2, 6.2
-
-
-
6.2
6.8
4.0
5.4
4.0
4.4
5.4
6.6
7.6
3
Pool XS Area (sq
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
7.9
9.2
3.3
5.8
3.3
3.7
5.8
8.6
11.4
y
=
m
Riffle XS Area (sf)
2.5, 4.1
2.3, 2.3
1.3
1.5
3.0, 4.0, 3.9, 4.1
-
-
-
3.1
3.6
1.2
2.1
1.2
1.4
2.2
3.3
4.4
Pool Width / Riffle Width
*
*
*
*
1.1 -- 1.5
1.1 -- 1.5
1.2--1.7
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
Pool Max Depth / Dbkf
*
*
*
2.0--3.5
2.0--3.5
1.5--3.5
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.3
3.3
2.0
3.3
3.2
3.0
Bank Height Ratio
5.0, 0.9
2.2, 1.6
8.0
6.1
1.5, 1.5, 2.1, 1.3
1.0 -- 1.1
1.0 -- 1.1
1.0 -- 1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Mean Bankfull Velocity (V) (fps)
4.0, 4.0
3.5, 3.7
3.4
3.1
4.3, 4.8, 5.2, 5.2
4.0--6.0
4.0--6.0
3.5--5.0
4.1
4.6
4.6
4.1
4.2
3.3
3.6
4.2
5.0
Bankfull Discharge (Q) (cfs)
9.7, 16.1
8.1, 8.3
4.6
4.6
12.8, 19.2, 20.4, 21.1
-
-
-
12.8
16.7
** 5.5
8.5
5.0
4.6
8.0
13.8
22.4
Radius of Curvature (Rc) (ft)
*
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
9-20
11--16
13--19
15--23
Belt Width (Wblt) (ft)
*
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
14--19
23--28
27--45
27--41
Meander Length (Lm) (ft)
*
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
58--64
71--75
81--127
98--117
a
Radius of Curvature / Bankfull Width
*
*
*
*
*
n/a
n/a
2-3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2.0--4.5
2.0--3.0
2.0--2.9
2.0--3.0
Meander Width Ratio (Wblt / Wbkf)
*
*
*
*
*
n/a
n/a
3.5--8
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
3.2--4.3
4.3--5.2
4.1--6.8
3.6--5.4
Meander Length / Bankfull Width
*
*
*
*
*
n/a
n/a
7-14
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
13.2--14.5
13.1 -- 14.0
12.3--17.1
12.8--15.3
Valley slope
0.032
0.042
0.072
0.039
0.029 -- 0.037
0.020 -- 0.030
0.005 -- 0.015
0.005 -- 0.015
0.032
n/a
0.042
0.072
0.039
0.029
0.033
0.037
Average water surface slope
0.027
0.039
0.053
0.05
0.023 -- 0.028
-
-
-
0.027
0.066
0.039
0.053
0.034
0.026
0.028
0.033
Riffle slope
0.034, 0.021
0.023, 0.018
0.033
0.031
0.021 -- 0.079
-
-
-
0.022 -- 0.054
0.066
0.053 -- 0.07
0.055 -- 0.069
0.017 -- 0.061
0.020 -- 0.044
0.025 -- 0.043
0.037 -- 0.055
Pool slope
*
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
Pool to pool spacing
*
*
*
*
*
-
-
-
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
31--40
40--43
49--56
56--64
a
Pool length
*
*
*
-
-
-
18
n/a
8
8
8-15
10--23
11--32
13--2
Riffle Slope / Avg. Water Surface Slope
1.3, 0.8
0.6, 0.5
0.6
0.6
1.0--3.4
1.1 -- 1.8
1.1 -- 1.8
1.2--1.5
0.8--2.0
1.0
1.4--1.8
1.0--1.3
0.5--1.8
0.8--1.7
0.9--1.5
1.1 -- 1.7
Pool Slope / Avg. Water Surface Slope
*
*
*
0--0.4
0--0.4
0--0.2
0
n/a
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pool to Pool Spacing / Bankfull Width
*
*
*
0.5--5.0
1.5--6.0
3.5--7
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
7-9
7--8
7-8
7.-- 8
* : no data shown for pools, radius of curvature or meanders in existing stream do to nature of channel
** : channel sized slightly larger for constructability

Site Name:
USACE Action ID:
NCDWR Project Number:
Sponsor:
County:
Minimum Required Buffer Width':
Mitigation Type
Restoration (1:1)
Enhancement 1 (1.5:1)
Enhancement II (2.5:1)
Preservation (5:1)
Other (7.5:1)
Other (10:1)
Custom Ratio 1
Custom Ratio 2
Custom Ratio 3
Custom Ratio 4
Custom Ratio 5
Totals
Buffer Zones
Max Possible Buffer (square feet)°
Ideal Buffer (square feet)S
Actual Buffer (square feet)6
Zone Multiplier
Buffer Credit Equivalent
Percent of Ideal Buffer
Credit Adjustment
Total Baseline Credit
3239.33
30
Mitigation Ratio Creditable Stream
4090.00
Baseline Stream Credit
2250.00
633.33
356.00
3239.33
Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator
Buffer Width Zone (feet from Ordinary High Water Mark)
less than 15 feet
>15 to 20 feet
>20 to 25 feet
>25 to 30 feet
>30 to 50 feet
>50 to 75 feet
>75 to 100 feet
>100 to 125 feet
>125 to 150 feet
122700
40900
40900
40900
163600
204500
204500
204500
204500
122823.42
40445.72
40138.05
40118.55
160788.04
201598.31
206080.67
209840.17
213868.22
121168.5501
39308.37297
38576.81953
38104.488
131922.2513
82658.96051
35069.3404
18986.04553
6547.045775
50%
20%
15%
15%
9%
7%
6%
5%
3%
1619.67
647.87
485.90
485.90
291.54
226.75
194.36
161.97
97.18
99%
97%
96%
95%
82%
41%
17%
9%
3%
-21.82
-18.22
-18.90
-24.39
239.20
92.97
33.07
14.65
2.97
Credit Loss in Required Credit Gain for Net Change in
Total Credit
Buffer Additional Buffer Credit from Buffers
-83.33 382.88 299.54 3538.88
'Minimum standard buffer width measured from the top of bank (50 feet in piedmont and coastal plain counties or 30 feet in mountain counties)
2Use the Custom Ratio fields to enter non-standard ratios, which are equal to the number of feet in the feet -to -credit mitigation ratio (e.g., for a perservation ratio of 8 feet to 1 credit, the multiplier would be 8).
3Equal to the number of feet of stream in each Mitigation Type. If stream reaches are not creditable, they should be excluded from this measurement, even if they fall within the easement.
4This amount is the maximum buffer area possible based on the linear footage of stream length if channel were perfectly straight with full buffer width. This number is not used in calculations, but is provided as a reference.
SMaximum potential size (in square feet) of each buffer zone measured around all creditable stream reaches, calculated using GIS, including areas outside of the easement. The inner zone (0-15') should be measured from the top of the OHWM or the edge of the average stream width if OHWM is not known. Non -creditable stream
reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS.
6Square feet in each buffer zone, as measured by GIS, excluding non -forested areas, all other credit type (e.g., wetland, nutrient offset, buffer), easement exceptions, open water, areas failing to meet the vegetation performance standard, etc. Additional credit is given to 150 feet in buffer width, so areas within the easement that are
more than 150 feet from creditable streams should not be included in this measurement. Non -creditable stream reaches within the easement should be removed prior to calculating this area wtih GIS

'yr
Project Easement
Sheet Boundaries
Buffer Distance From TOB
- 0-15'
15-20-
20-25-
25-30'
5-20'20-25'25-30'
30-50'
50-75-
75-100'
- 100-125'
- 125-150'
Proposed Mitigation - 3,539 SMC*
Restoration (2,250 If / 2,250 SMC)
Enhancement 1 (950 If / 633 SMC)
Enhancement 2 (890 If / 356 SMC)
* - Includes an additional 300
Credit for additional Buffer Widths
0 50 100 N
Feet n
Source: NC Statewide
Orthoimagery, 2014.
l � \1• \ 4 . �t. 'i
y.
EASEMENT WIDTH EXHIBIT
HAIR SHEEP STREAM MITIGATION BANK
SURRY COUNTY, NC
SHEET 2of3
f*� fiv
�L
•ti`
Q
�
'yr
Project Easement
Sheet Boundaries
Buffer Distance From TOB
- 0-15'
15-20-
20-25-
25-30'
5-20'20-25'25-30'
30-50'
50-75-
75-100'
- 100-125'
- 125-150'
Proposed Mitigation - 3,539 SMC*
Restoration (2,250 If / 2,250 SMC)
Enhancement 1 (950 If / 633 SMC)
Enhancement 2 (890 If / 356 SMC)
* - Includes an additional 300
Credit for additional Buffer Widths
0 50 100 N
Feet n
Source: NC Statewide
Orthoimagery, 2014.
l � \1• \ 4 . �t. 'i
y.
EASEMENT WIDTH EXHIBIT
HAIR SHEEP STREAM MITIGATION BANK
SURRY COUNTY, NC
SHEET 2of3

12.3 Site Protection Instrument
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made thisday of-
, 201_ by and between Robert Edgar Smith, Jr. and Treva Nichols Smith,
("Grantor") and Atlantic Coast Conservancy ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their
heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter
as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and being in
Surry County, North Carolina, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation,
association, or trust qualified under § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code,

the purposes or powers of which include one or more of the purposes (a) — (d) listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open -space aspects of
real property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational, or
open -space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water quality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural
communities: wetlands, streams and riparian buffers. The purpose of this Conservation
Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands and riparian resources and other natural values of
approximately 12.42 acres, more or less, and being more particularly described in Exhibit B
attached hereto and incorporated fully herein by reference (the "Conservation Easement
Area"), and prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area for any
purpose or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) and
Mitigation Plan for the Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank, Department of the Army (DA)
Action ID Number SAW -2018-00712, entitled "Agreement to Establish the KCI Yadkin 01
Umbrella Mitigation Bank in the Yadkin River Basin within the State of North Carolina",
entered into by and between KCI Technologies, Inc. acting as the Bank Sponsor and the
Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the North Carolina
Interagency Review Team (IRT). The Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Site has been approved
by the Corps for use as a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable stream and wetland
impacts authorized by DA permits.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of enforcement shall be
held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ('Third -Party," to include any
successor agencies), and may be exercised through the appropriate enforcement agencies of
the United States, and that these rights are in addition to, and do not limit, the rights of
enforcement under the Department of the Army instrument number SAW- ("Mitigation
Banking Instrument"), or any permit or certification issued by the Third -Party.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and representations
contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably
grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity
a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth,
over the Conservation Easement Area described on Exhibit B, together with the right to
preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows:

DURATIONOF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is an easement in
gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, Grantor's personal
representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with the
purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation Easement Area shall be
preserved in its natural condition and restricted from any development that would impair or
interfere with the conservation values of the Conservation Easement Area.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are
expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any introduction of
non-native plants and/or animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile
home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, antenna, utility
pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or permanent structure
or facility on or above the Conservation Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting or
mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement Area except as
provided in the Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous vegetation for purposes
of enhancing planted or volunteer trees and shrubs approved in the Mitigation Plan is allowable
once a year for no more than five consecutive years from the date on page 1 of this
Conservation Easement, except where mowing will negatively impact vegetation or disturb
soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed by KCI Technologies Inc. and shall not violate
any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways on the
Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails or

walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement Area,
except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the
Conservation Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations forthe
use of the Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the
Conservation Easement Area.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or hazardous
waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other materials on
the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation,
dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals or other
materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any manner on the Conservation
Easement Area, except to restore natural topography or drainage patterns. For purposes of
restoring and enhancing streams and wetlands within the Conservation Easement Area, KCI
Technologies, Inc. is allowed to perform grading, filling, and excavation associated with stream
and wetland restoration and enhancement activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and
authorized by Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering or tampering
with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced,
or created drainage patterns. In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of
surface or underground water into, within or out of the easement area by any means, removal
of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide
or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable
development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for
temporary or occasional access by KCI Technologies Inc., the Grantee, its employees and
agents, successors, assigns, and the Corps for purposes of constructing, maintaining and
monitoring the restoration, enhancement and preservation of streams, wetlands and
riparian areas within the Conservation Easement Area.
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation Easement
Area which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation of
the Conservation Easement Area substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its

environmental systems, is prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs,
successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the Conservation Easement Area for all
purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited to, the
right to quiet enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area, the rights of ingress and egress,
the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the Conservation Easement Area, the right to sell, transfer,
gift or otherwise convey the Conservation Easement Area, in whole or in part, provided such
sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms of, and shall specifically reference, this
Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its
successors and assigns, including KCI Technologies, Inc. acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right
to construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and preservation
of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation Easement Area in accordance
with the approved Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Plan, and the Mitigation Banking Instrument
described in the Recitals of this Conservation
Easement.
ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the Corps,
shall have the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all reasonable
times for the purpose of inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to determine if the
Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, is complying with the
terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation Easement. The Grantee, KCI
Technologies Inc., and its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the Corps
shall also have the right to enter and go upon the Conservation Easement Area for purposes
of making scientific or educational observations and studies, and taking samples. The
easement rights granted herein do not include public access rights.

ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Corps are allowed
to prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with
the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the
Conservation Easement Area that may be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach
of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the
Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have
30 days after receipt of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the
breach remains uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement
by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to
obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of
the terms of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially
impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee
acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and
remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided
hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to
Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a breach, correction or
restoration, including the Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be paid
by Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps shall
have the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and conditions
of this Conservation easement.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision hereof
shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or provision
hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a subsequent breach
or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to entitle
Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Conservation
Easement Area resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without
limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or
invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor under emergency
conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm
to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such causes.

ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the Property
in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Propertywhich may be impaired
by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no outstanding mortgages,
tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property which have not been expressly
subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor further warrants that Grantee shall
have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived from and arising out of this Conservation
Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the Property against the claims of
all persons. _
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any interest in all
or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor agrees to provide written notice
of such transfer at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and
Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the
fee and easement interests in the Conservation Easement Area or any portion thereof and
shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior written consent and approval
of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation
Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the Grantee hereby covenants
and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the
organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a)(1),
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code,
and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment
will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the
conservation purposes described in this document.
D. Entire Agreement and Severability. The Mitigation Banking Instrument: MBI with
corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the entire
agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior
discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation
Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a court of competent
jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes,
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property free
of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except those incurred
after the date hereof, which are expressly subject and subordinate to the Conservation
Easement. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as
expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to

comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the
exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long -Term Management. If livestock operations will be maintained on the
property, Grantor is responsible for all long-term management activities associated with
fencing to ensure livestock do not have access to the Protected Property. These activities
include the maintenance and/or replacement offence structures, as deemed necessary by the
Grantee, to ensure the aquatic resource functions within the boundaries of the Protected
Property are sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the
continued use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this
Conservation Easement may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area is taken
in the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by
this Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the time
of such taking to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct damages
due to the taking.
I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation Easement
Area is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an extinguishment or the exercise
of eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation
Easement as determined at the time of the extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication required
under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage
prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified by notice
pursuant to this paragraph):
To Grantor:
Robert Edgar Smith. Jr.
Treva Nichols Smith
2240 Maple Grove Church Road
Lowgap, North Carolina 27024
336-401-1149 (mobile)

To Grantee:
Atlantic Coast Conservancy
72 South Main Street
Jasper, Georgia 30143
Attn: Robert Keller, Ph.D,
706-273-9173
To Sponsor:
KCI Technologies, Inc.
4505 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 400
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Attn: Gary M. Mryncza, PE
919-783-9214
To the Corps:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this
Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to make
an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's interest shall
become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an appropriate proceeding in
a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a writing
signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification
of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is
consistent with the conservation purposes of this grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The wetlands, scenic,
resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation Easement
Area, and its current use and state of improvement, are described in Section 3.0 of the
Mitigation Plan, prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and Grantee to be
complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee have copies of this
report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any future changes in the use of the
Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with the terms of this Conservation Easement.
However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other evidence to establish the
present condition of the Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for the
aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and
year first above written.
Robert Edgar Smith, Jr.
Treva Nichols Smith
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid,
do hereby certify that , Grantor, personally appeared before me
this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the day
of , 20_.
Notary Public
My commission expires:

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ("Conservation Easement") made thisday of-
, 201_ by and between J. Glenn Nichols and wife, Glenda Nichols, ("Grantor") and
Atlantic Coast Conservancy ("Grantee").
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their
heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter
as required by context.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and being in
Surry County, North Carolina, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein (the "Property");
WHEREAS, Grantee is a charitable, not-for-profit or educational corporation,
association, or trust qualified under § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code,

the purposes or powers of which include one or more of the purposes (a) — (d) listed below;
(a) retaining or protecting natural, scenic, or open -space aspects of
real property;
(b) ensuring the availability of real property for recreational, educational, or
open -space use;
(c) protecting natural resources;
(d) maintaining or enhancing air or water quality.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or
aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural
communities: wetlands, streams and riparian buffers. The purpose of this Conservation
Easement is to maintain streams, wetlands and riparian resources and other natural values of
approximately 12.42 acres, more or less, and being more particularly described in Exhibit B
attached hereto and incorporated fully herein by reference (the "Conservation Easement
Area"), and prevent the use or development of the Conservation Easement Area for any
purpose or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of its natural condition.
WHEREAS, the restoration, enhancement and preservation of the Conservation
Easement Area is a condition of the approval of the Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) and
Mitigation Plan for the Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank, Department of the Army (DA)
Action ID Number SAW -2018-00712, entitled "Agreement to Establish the KCI Yadkin 01
Umbrella Mitigation Bank in the Yadkin River Basin within the State of North Carolina",
entered into by and between KCI Technologies, Inc. acting as the Bank Sponsor and the
Wilmington District Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the North Carolina
Interagency Review Team (IRT). The Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Site has been approved
by the Corps for use as a mitigation bank to compensate for unavoidable stream and wetland
impacts authorized by DA permits.
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee agree that third -party rights of enforcement shall be
held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ('Third -Party," to include any
successor agencies), and may be exercised through the appropriate enforcement agencies of
the United States, and that these rights are in addition to, and do not limit, the rights of
enforcement under the Department of the Army instrument number SAW- ("Mitigation
Banking Instrument"), or any permit or certification issued by the Third -Party.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and representations
contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably
grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity
a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth,
over the Conservation Easement Area described on Exhibit B, together with the right to
preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows:

DURATIONOF EASEMENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This Conservation Easement is an easement in
gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, Grantor's personal
representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and licensees.
ARTICLE II.
PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
Any activity on, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area inconsistent with the
purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Conservation Easement Area shall be
preserved in its natural condition and restricted from any development that would impair or
interfere with the conservation values of the Conservation Easement Area.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are
expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder:
A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any introduction of
non-native plants and/or animal species is prohibited.
B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile
home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, antenna, utility
pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or permanent structure
or facility on or above the Conservation Easement Area.
C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or
commercial activities, including any rights of passage for such purposes are prohibited.
D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal
husbandry, and horticultural use of the Conservation Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting or
mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation in the Conservation Easement Area except as
provided in the Mitigation Plan. Mowing of invasive and herbaceous vegetation for purposes
of enhancing planted or volunteer trees and shrubs approved in the Mitigation Plan is allowable
once a year for no more than five consecutive years from the date on page 1 of this
Conservation Easement, except where mowing will negatively impact vegetation or disturb
soils. Mowing activities shall only be performed by KCI Technologies Inc. and shall not violate
any part of Item L of Article II.
F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways on the
Conservation Easement Area; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails or

walkways.
G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Conservation Easement Area,
except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the
Conservation Easement Area, signs giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations forthe
use of the Conservation Easement Area and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the
Conservation Easement Area.
H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or hazardous
waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other materials on
the Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation,
dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals or other
materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any manner on the Conservation
Easement Area, except to restore natural topography or drainage patterns. For purposes of
restoring and enhancing streams and wetlands within the Conservation Easement Area, KCI
Technologies, Inc. is allowed to perform grading, filling, and excavation associated with stream
and wetland restoration and enhancement activities as described in the Mitigation Plan and
authorized by Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 27.
J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering or tampering
with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced,
or created drainage patterns. In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of
surface or underground water into, within or out of the easement area by any means, removal
of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide
or biocides is prohibited.
K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or
extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable
development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.
L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to,
motorcycles, dirt bikes, all -terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited other than for
temporary or occasional access by KCI Technologies Inc., the Grantee, its employees and
agents, successors, assigns, and the Corps for purposes of constructing, maintaining and
monitoring the restoration, enhancement and preservation of streams, wetlands and
riparian areas within the Conservation Easement Area.
M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Conservation Easement
Area which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation of
the Conservation Easement Area substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its

environmental systems, is prohibited.
ARTICLE III
GRANTOR'S RESEVERED RIGHTS
The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs,
successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the Conservation Easement Area for all
purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited to, the
right to quiet enjoyment of the Conservation Easement Area, the rights of ingress and egress,
the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the Conservation Easement Area, the right to sell, transfer,
gift or otherwise convey the Conservation Easement Area, in whole or in part, provided such
sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms of, and shall specifically reference, this
Conservation Easement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its
successors and assigns, including KCI Technologies, Inc. acting as the Bank Sponsor, the right
to construct and perform activities related to the restoration, enhancement, and preservation
of streams, wetlands and riparian areas within the Conservation Easement Area in accordance
with the approved Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Plan, and the Mitigation Banking Instrument
described in the Recitals of this Conservation
Easement.
ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the Corps,
shall have the right to enter the Property and Conservation Easement Area at all reasonable
times for the purpose of inspecting the Conservation Easement Area to determine if the
Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, is complying with the
terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation Easement. The Grantee, KCI
Technologies Inc., and its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the Corps
shall also have the right to enter and go upon the Conservation Easement Area for purposes
of making scientific or educational observations and studies, and taking samples. The
easement rights granted herein do not include public access rights.

ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee, and the Corps are allowed
to prevent any activity on or use of the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with
the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the
Conservation Easement Area that may be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach
of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the
Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have
30 days after receipt of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the
breach remains uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement
by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to
obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of
the terms of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially
impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee
acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and
remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided
hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to
Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a breach, correction or
restoration, including the Grantee's expenses, court costs, and attorneys' fees, shall be paid
by Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps shall
have the same rights and privileges as the said Grantee to enforce the terms and conditions
of this Conservation easement.
B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision hereof
shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or provision
hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a subsequent breach
or default.
C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to entitle
Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Conservation
Easement Area resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without
limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except Grantor's lessees or
invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor under emergency
conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm
to the Conservation Easement Area resulting from such causes.

ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the Property
in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Propertywhich may be impaired
by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no outstanding mortgages,
tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property which have not been expressly
subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor further warrants that Grantee shall
have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived from and arising out of this Conservation
Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the Property against the claims of
all persons. _
B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this
Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any interest in all
or a portion of the Conservation Easement Area. The Grantor agrees to provide written notice
of such transfer at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and
Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the
fee and easement interests in the Conservation Easement Area or any portion thereof and
shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior written consent and approval
of the Corps.
C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation
Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the Grantee hereby covenants
and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the
organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder pursuant to 33 CFR 332.7 (a)(1),
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 501 (c)(3) and § 170 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code,
and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment
will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the
conservation purposes described in this document.
D. Entire Agreement and Severability. The Mitigation Banking Instrument: MBI with
corresponding Mitigation Plan, and this Conservation Easement sets forth the entire
agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior
discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation
Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a court of competent
jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.
E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes,
assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property free
of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor, except those incurred
after the date hereof, which are expressly subject and subordinate to the Conservation
Easement. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as
expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to

comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the
exercise of the Reserved Rights.
F. Long -Term Management. If livestock operations will be maintained on the
property, Grantor is responsible for all long-term management activities associated with
fencing to ensure livestock do not have access to the Protected Property. These activities
include the maintenance and/or replacement offence structures, as deemed necessary by the
Grantee, to ensure the aquatic resource functions within the boundaries of the Protected
Property are sustained.
G. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the
continued use of the Conservation Easement Area for the conservation purposes, this
Conservation Easement may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding.
H. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Conservation Easement Area is taken
in the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by
this Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the time
of such taking to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct damages
due to the taking.
I. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest
immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of the Conservation Easement
Area is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an extinguishment or the exercise
of eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation
Easement as determined at the time of the extinguishment or condemnation.
J. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication required
under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage
prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified by notice
pursuant to this paragraph):
To Grantor:
J. Glenn Nichols
Glenda Nichols
807 Cadle Ford Road
Mount Airy NC 27030
336-320-2430 (mobile)

To Grantee:
Atlantic Coast Conservancy
72 South Main Street
Jasper, Georgia 30143
Attn: Robert Keller, Ph.D,
706-273-9173
To Sponsor:
KCI Technologies, Inc.
4505 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 400
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Attn: Gary M. Mryncza, PE
919-783-9214
To the Corps:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Regulatory Division
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
K. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this
Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a
reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to make
an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee's interest shall
become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an appropriate proceeding in
a court of competent jurisdiction.
L. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a writing
signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification
of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is
consistent with the conservation purposes of this grant.
M. Present Condition of the Conservation Easement Area. The wetlands, scenic,
resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Conservation Easement
Area, and its current use and state of improvement, are described in Section 3.0 of the
Mitigation Plan, prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and Grantee to be
complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee have copies of this
report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any future changes in the use of the
Conservation Easement Area will be consistent with the terms of this Conservation Easement.
However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other evidence to establish the
present condition of the Conservation Easement Area if there is a controversy over its use.

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for the
aforesaid purposes.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and
year first above written.
J. Glenn Nichols
Glenda Nichols
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, , a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid,
do hereby certify that , Grantor, personally appeared before me
this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the day
of , 20_.
Notary Public
My commission expires:

NOTES:
1. THIS PLAT DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PARENT
TRACTS. THE PARENT TRACT BOUNDARIES ADJACENT TO THIS EASEMENT ARE NOT
CHANGED BY THIS PLAT. BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS DERIVED
FROM DEEDS AND MAPS OF RECORD IN COLUMBUS COUNTY AND MONUMENTATION
FOUND IN THE FIELD.
2. DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN U.S. SURVEY FEET
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. AREA COMPUTED BY COORDINATE METHOD.
4. THE BASIS OF THE MERIDIANS AND COORDINATES FOR THIS PLAT IS THE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM
1983 (NAD 83), BASED ON DIFFERENTIAL GPS OBSERVATIONS PERFORMED IN
OCTOBER 2018.
5. DEED REFERENCES: AS SHOWN HEREON.
6. SUBJECT PROPERTIES KNOWN AS TAX NUMBER: AS SHOWN HEREON.
7. SUBJECT EASEMENT LIES WITHIN THE AREA DESIGNATED AS ZONE "X", BASED ON
FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 3710498800J, EFFECTIVE AUG 18, 2009.
S. NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATING PERFORMED DURING THE COURSE OF THIS
SURVEY.
O FIP \
P �1 2"
OP
0
O
427
P
N/F #21 #242
GLENN & GLENDA N 6 #25
NICHOL S FIP
PIN 49990666105 1/
DB 1265 PG 372 #20 C 79 #19
D
`,d • #26
NCGS MON
LINDA (AH4028)
N: 1, 001,129.58
E.• 1, 490,593 02
CSF.- 1.00005289
IV/F
GLENN J NICHOLS
PIN 499900764767
DB 445 PG 1512
CONSERVATION � #18 #23
EASEMENT #2
44,149 S.F.
1.01 ACRES
N
C� J
#17
I, JAMES M. GELLENTHIN, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION (DEED REFERENCE AS SHOWN, THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT
SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION
FOUND IN BOOK AND PAGE AS SHOWN; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS
CALCULATED IS GREATER THAN 1:10,000; THAT THIS MAP DOES
REPRESENT AN OFFICIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY AND HAS BEEN PREPARED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30 AS AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL
SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL THIS 19TH DAY OF
DECEMBER, 2018.
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTRATION NUMBER L-3860
JAMES M. GELLENTHIN
I, JAMES M. GELLENTHIN, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, NO. L-3860
CERTIFY TO THE FOLLOWING AS REQUIRED IN G.S. 47-30 (F) -(11)-(D):
THAT THE SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE
RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT ORDERED SURVEY, OR
OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION.
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTRATION NUMBER L-3860
JAMES M. GELLENTHIN
IV/F w l
DA VID YANCEY
NICHOLS
LIFE ES TA TE
PIN 499902873918
DB 1362 PG 325
N
O
O
tx
#%_ L5 #6
#4
2
7
CP
C3
N/F
BRADLEY MOSLEM
PIN 499900766011
DB 621 PG 898
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
SURRY COUNTY
I, , REVIEW OFFICER
OF SURRY COUNTY, CERTIFY THAT THE MAP
OR PLAT WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS AFFIXED
MEETS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
RECORDING.
REVIEW OFFICER DATE
#27
#33
FIP
3/4
NIF-
TREVA NICHOLS SMITH
PIN 499902865621
OB 1362 PG 329
#28
FILED FOR REGISTRATION AT O'CLOCK ON
THIS _ DAY OF 2018, AND RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK PAGE
CAROLYN COMER, REGISTER OF DEEDS
FILING FEE $21 PAID.
BY DEPUTY ASSISTANT
#3
N/F
ROBERT EDGAR SMITH ✓R
& TRE VA SMI TH
PIN 499900887042
DB 1362 PG 309
�2
6,J
FIP
112"
m1.
#29
#2
#9
F-
00
"� #8
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT #1
197,667 S.F.
4,54 ACRES
47
CP
N58`41'23"W--- ,
56.76'
N75°18'59"W
124.14'
NA
LEGEND
O CALCULATED POINT
.0 EXISTING IRON
® 5/8" REBAR SET W/ 3.25" ALUMINUM
CAP WITH STATE SEAL
0 EXISTING MONUMENT
O NEW CONSERVATION EASEMENT
P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
#10
LOT 15
FIP 3/4"
LOT 14
LOT I3
O
O O
FIP 3/4"
LOT 12
C)C
v 00
FIP 3/4" ti O
LOT 11 Z
#15
L15
SS
86 SSS'
BEARING
#16
#11
6S 38.
J
L2
69' F
N49°13'01"W
P.O.B.
CE#2
262.58
#14
#13 �1�
CE#1
13
L12 #12 ^w LLJ
CO
64.58
\
o CONSERVA TION
IP 5/8"
S09'33'44"W
cd EASEMENT #3
563.08
547'48'14"E
CD
299,176 S.F.
327.86
N00'35'50"W
#24 6.87ACRES
204.59
N49'03'36"E
FIP 5/8"
678.50
S01 *39'56"E
P.O.B. CE#3
113.32
564'17'05"W
P.O.C. CE#2
55.55
584'21'25"W
N: 996528.15
74.00
N75'16'20"W
E: 1497936.12
75.17
N00'00'00"E
N/F ass
154.29
N84'26'47"E
S& T NICHOLS
53.54
N43'13'24"E
PROPERTIES LLC
112.88
NO3'07'19"E
PIN 499900767381
154.02
N39°11'59"W
DB 1286 PG 131
I, JAMES M. GELLENTHIN, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
SUPERVISION (DEED REFERENCE AS SHOWN, THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT
SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION
FOUND IN BOOK AND PAGE AS SHOWN; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION AS
CALCULATED IS GREATER THAN 1:10,000; THAT THIS MAP DOES
REPRESENT AN OFFICIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY AND HAS BEEN PREPARED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30 AS AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL
SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SEAL THIS 19TH DAY OF
DECEMBER, 2018.
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTRATION NUMBER L-3860
JAMES M. GELLENTHIN
I, JAMES M. GELLENTHIN, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, NO. L-3860
CERTIFY TO THE FOLLOWING AS REQUIRED IN G.S. 47-30 (F) -(11)-(D):
THAT THE SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE
RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT ORDERED SURVEY, OR
OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION.
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTRATION NUMBER L-3860
JAMES M. GELLENTHIN
IV/F w l
DA VID YANCEY
NICHOLS
LIFE ES TA TE
PIN 499902873918
DB 1362 PG 325
N
O
O
tx
#%_ L5 #6
#4
2
7
CP
C3
N/F
BRADLEY MOSLEM
PIN 499900766011
DB 621 PG 898
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
SURRY COUNTY
I, , REVIEW OFFICER
OF SURRY COUNTY, CERTIFY THAT THE MAP
OR PLAT WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION IS AFFIXED
MEETS ALL STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
RECORDING.
REVIEW OFFICER DATE
#27
#33
FIP
3/4
NIF-
TREVA NICHOLS SMITH
PIN 499902865621
OB 1362 PG 329
#28
FILED FOR REGISTRATION AT O'CLOCK ON
THIS _ DAY OF 2018, AND RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK PAGE
CAROLYN COMER, REGISTER OF DEEDS
FILING FEE $21 PAID.
BY DEPUTY ASSISTANT
#3
N/F
ROBERT EDGAR SMITH ✓R
& TRE VA SMI TH
PIN 499900887042
DB 1362 PG 309
�2
6,J
FIP
112"
m1.
#29
#2
#9
F-
00
"� #8
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT #1
197,667 S.F.
4,54 ACRES
47
CP
N58`41'23"W--- ,
56.76'
N75°18'59"W
124.14'
NA
LEGEND
O CALCULATED POINT
.0 EXISTING IRON
® 5/8" REBAR SET W/ 3.25" ALUMINUM
CAP WITH STATE SEAL
0 EXISTING MONUMENT
O NEW CONSERVATION EASEMENT
P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING
P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
#10
LOT 15
FIP 3/4"
LOT 14
LOT I3
O
O O
FIP 3/4"
LOT 12
C)C
v 00
FIP 3/4" ti O
LOT 11 Z
L32 #30 185 28'(TI
N87 23'50"W-475.80'
N/F
BRIAN & IVARI SEAL
PIN 499900955107
DB 1517 PG 828
LINE TABLE
LINE
LOT 10
BEARING
Ll
270.97
N65'29'32"W
L2
IF4"
N49°13'01"W
L3
262.58
N45'16'47"W
CP
CE#1
N44'39'40"E
958.54LOT 9
64.58
9273.15
L6
IP 5/8"
L32 #30 185 28'(TI
N87 23'50"W-475.80'
N/F
BRIAN & IVARI SEAL
PIN 499900955107
DB 1517 PG 828
POINT# NORTHING
1 997102.56
2 997214.97
3 997500.33
4 997685.09
5 997818.45
6 997818.45
7 997697.07
8 997318.87
9 997646.71
10 997780.77
11 996723.58
12 996674.41
13 996668.95
14 996687.76
15 996762.94
16 996777.87
17 996816.89
18 996929.60
19 997048.96
20 997066.53
21 997150.43
22 997139.95
23 996924.92
N/F
BRIAN & MA R1 SEAL
PIN 499900985965
DB 1508 PG 5,37
FIP 1/2"
EASTI N G
1499268.96
1499022.40
1498691.61
1498505.03
1498636.82
1498701.40
1498680.95
1499098.11
1499094.69
1499249.24
1497969.46
1497867.36
1497812.08
1497740.52
1497740.52
1497894.09
1497930.76
1497936.91
1497839.56
1497787.78
1497818.73
1497838.83
1498003.82
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
OWNER CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY
SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE
SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION OF THE COUNTY OF SURRY AND THAT
I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE
CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK LINES AS NOTED.
ROBERT EDGAR SMITH JR DATE
TREVA SMITH DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY
SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE
SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION OF THE COUNTY OF SURRY AND THAT
1 HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE
CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK LINES AS NOTED.
GLENN J NICHOLS
DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY
SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE
SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION OF THE COUNTY OF SURRY AND THAT
I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE
CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK LINES AS NOTED.
TREVA NICHOLS SMITH
DATE
GRAPHIC SCALE
150 0 75 150 300
1 INCH = 150 FEET
FINAL PLAT
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
FOR
ATLANTIC COAST CONSERVANCY
PROJECT NAME: HAIR SHEEP
DMS PROJECT #:
SPO FILE NOS.
STEWARTS CREEK TOWNSHIP, SURRY COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: I SCALE: SHEET:
nP (P'hA PP A ')n1 R 1" _ 1 �n' 1 np, 1
K C 1
ASSOCIATES OF
NORTH CAROLINA
C-0764
KCI ASSOCIATES OF N.C.
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS
4505 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, FLOOR 4
RALEIGH, NC 27607
PHONE [phone] * FAX [phone]
LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
Ll
270.97
N65'29'32"W
L2
436.87
N49°13'01"W
L3
262.58
N45'16'47"W
L4
187.49
N44'39'40"E
L5
64.58
N90'00'00"E
L6
123.09
S09'33'44"W
L7
563.08
547'48'14"E
L8
327.86
N00'35'50"W
L9
204.59
N49'03'36"E
L10
678.50
S01 *39'56"E
Lll
113.32
564'17'05"W
L12
55.55
584'21'25"W
L13
74.00
N75'16'20"W
L14
75.17
N00'00'00"E
L15
154.29
N84'26'47"E
L16
53.54
N43'13'24"E
L17
112.88
NO3'07'19"E
L18
154.02
N39°11'59"W
L19
54.68
N71 °15'11 "W
L20
89.43
N20°14'51"E
L21
22.67
S62'28'04"E
L22
271.04
S37'29'49"E
L23
204.24
S09'40'58"W
L24
402.50
N09'40'58"E
L25
271.04
N37 -29'49"W
L26
73.94
S62'28'04"E
L27
195.72
539'40'16"E
L28
649.17
S29'03'25"E
L29
302.88
S61 °53'57"E
L30
315.93
S52'58'58"E
L31
387.01
S36'57'34"E
L32
264.36
N87'23'50"W
L33
92.29
N16 -52'14"W
L34
649.40N51'42'47"W
L35
456.05
N52'08'13"W
POINT# NORTHING
1 997102.56
2 997214.97
3 997500.33
4 997685.09
5 997818.45
6 997818.45
7 997697.07
8 997318.87
9 997646.71
10 997780.77
11 996723.58
12 996674.41
13 996668.95
14 996687.76
15 996762.94
16 996777.87
17 996816.89
18 996929.60
19 997048.96
20 997066.53
21 997150.43
22 997139.95
23 996924.92
N/F
BRIAN & MA R1 SEAL
PIN 499900985965
DB 1508 PG 5,37
FIP 1/2"
EASTI N G
1499268.96
1499022.40
1498691.61
1498505.03
1498636.82
1498701.40
1498680.95
1499098.11
1499094.69
1499249.24
1497969.46
1497867.36
1497812.08
1497740.52
1497740.52
1497894.09
1497930.76
1497936.91
1497839.56
1497787.78
1497818.73
1497838.83
1498003.82
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
OWNER CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY
SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE
SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION OF THE COUNTY OF SURRY AND THAT
I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE
CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK LINES AS NOTED.
ROBERT EDGAR SMITH JR DATE
TREVA SMITH DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY
SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE
SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION OF THE COUNTY OF SURRY AND THAT
1 HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE
CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK LINES AS NOTED.
GLENN J NICHOLS
DATE
OWNER CERTIFICATION
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY
SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON, WHICH IS LOCATED IN THE
SUBDIVISION JURISDICTION OF THE COUNTY OF SURRY AND THAT
I HEREBY ADOPT THIS PLAN OF SUBDIVISION WITH MY FREE
CONSENT AND ESTABLISH MINIMUM SETBACK LINES AS NOTED.
TREVA NICHOLS SMITH
DATE
GRAPHIC SCALE
150 0 75 150 300
1 INCH = 150 FEET
FINAL PLAT
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
FOR
ATLANTIC COAST CONSERVANCY
PROJECT NAME: HAIR SHEEP
DMS PROJECT #:
SPO FILE NOS.
STEWARTS CREEK TOWNSHIP, SURRY COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: I SCALE: SHEET:
nP (P'hA PP A ')n1 R 1" _ 1 �n' 1 np, 1
K C 1
ASSOCIATES OF
NORTH CAROLINA
C-0764
KCI ASSOCIATES OF N.C.
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS
4505 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, FLOOR 4
RALEIGH, NC 27607
PHONE [phone] * FAX [phone]

12.4 Credit Release Schedule
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported in the final design plans unless
otherwise documented and provided to the Interagency Review Team following construction. Under no
circumstances shall any mitigation project be debited until the necessary DA authorization has been
received for its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has otherwise provided written approval for the
project in the case where no DA authorization is required for construction of the mitigation project. The
DE, in consultation with the Interagency Review Team (IRT), will determine if performance standards have
been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release schedules below. In cases where some
performance standards have not been met, credits may still be released depending on the specifics of the
case. Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended, depending on the extent to which the site
fails to meet the specified performance standard. The release of project credits will be subject to the
criteria described as follows:
Stream Credit Release Schedule — 7 year Timeframe
Monitoring
Interim
Total
Credit Release Activity
Year
Release
Released
0
Initial Allocation — see requirements below
30%
30%
1
First year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
40%
standards are being met
2
Second year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
50%
standards are being met
3
Third year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
60%
standards are being met
4
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
5%
65% (75%*)
standards are being met
5
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
75% (85%*)
standards are being met
6
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
5%
80% (90%*)
standards are being met
7
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance standards are
10%
90% (100%*)
being met, and project has received close-out approval from IRT
*See Subsequent Credit Releases description below
Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits, as specified in the mitigation plan, can be released without prior
written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities:
a. Approval of the final Mitigation Plan
b. Recordation of the preservation mechanism, as well as a title opinion acceptable to the USACE
covering the property
c. Completion of project construction (the initial physical and biological improvements to the
mitigation site) pursuant to the mitigation plan; construction means that a mitigation site has
been constructed in its entirety, to include planting, and an as -built report has been produced.
As -built reports must be sealed by an engineer prior to project closeout, if appropriate but not
prior to the initial allocation of released credits.
d. Receipt of necessary DA permit authorization or written DA approval for projects where DA permit
issuance is not required.
Subsequent Credit Releases
All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required performance standards have been achieved. For stream project with a 7 -year
monitoring period, a reserve of 10% of a site's total stream credits shall be released after four bankfull
events have occurred, in separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

standards are met. In the event that less than four bankfull events occur during the monitoring period,
release of these reserve credits shall be at the discretion of the IRT. As projects approach milestones
associated with credit release, KCI will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with
documentation substantiating achievement of criteria required for release to occur. This documentation
will be included with the annual monitoring report.
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

12.5 Financial Assurance
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Financial Assurances
KCI has significant experience procuring and managing Financial Assurances for mitigation projects. This
project will involve securing a series of casualty insurance policies that will serve as the financial
assurances for the various phases of this project, including construction, monitoring, and adaptive
management. This insurance will be secured at two year increments. USACE shall receive written
notification at least 120 days in advance of any termination or revocation of insurance secured for
financial assurance during the Construction Stage, or the Monitoring & Adaptive Management Stage.
The Bank Sponsor is responsible for providing Financial Assurances for the performance and completion
of Bank construction, management, monitoring, and Remedial Action in accordance with this MBI, as
set forth in this Section. KCI shall provide written confirmation from the agency or Conservation
Easement Holder, as applicable, that the requirement was completed to each member of the IRT in
accordance with this Section upon furnishing each of the following Financial Assurances:
Construction Financial Assurances
Prior to the first Credit Release, the Bank Sponsor shall furnish to USACE a Construction Financial
Assurance (CFA) in the amount of 100% of the reasonable estimate to establish, restore, or enhance
Waters of the U.S. and/or Waters of the State in accordance with the Mitigation Plan. The Construction
Financial Assurance shall be in the form of casualty insurance. The Bank Sponsor shall ensure the
Construction Financial Assurance shall remain in effect in the full amount required by this MBI throughout
the performance of construction and planting to establish, restore, or enhance Waters of the U.S. and/or
Waters of the State on the Bank Property in accordance with the Mitigation Plan. The fully funded amount
will be $491,000. This value is based on the detailed construction budget breakdown derived for the
project.
a. Construction Financial Assurance Contingency Plan
1. Should the USACE determine that a claim on the Construction Financial Assurance has
become necessary, the insurance carrier shall allocate funds to a standby trust fund
for distribution to a qualified contractor.
2. In the event of a claim, it would be the responsibility of the entity receiving the funds
to develop a proposal for accomplishing the mitigation project goals. USACE in
coordination with the IRT will have the ability to review and approve the plan prior to
implementation.
3. The Construction Financial Assurance shall be phased out by USACE, after
coordination with the IRT, only after the Bank Sponsor completes the construction
and planting activities in accordance with the Mitigation Plan, as demonstrated by:
• Bank Sponsor's submission of As -Built drawings in accordance with Section
II.E.iii. and Section 11.1;
• an on-site inspection by the IRT; and
• written approval from the IRT.

Monitoring & Adaptive Management Financial Assurances
Before the first Credit Release in the Monitoring and Adaptive Management Period, the Bank Sponsor
shall furnish to USACE Monitoring & Adaptive Management Financial Assurances (AMFA) in the amount
of .
The Monitoring & Adaptive Management Financial Assurances shall be in the form of casualty insurance.
The Bank Sponsor shall ensure the Monitoring & Adaptive Management Financial Assurances shall remain
available in the full amount required by this MBI until the end of the Adaptive Management Period. The
fully funded amount will be $190,000 based upon information furnished in Table 1 below.
a. Adaptive Management Financial Assurance Contingency Plan
1. Should USACE determine a claim on the AMFA is necessary, the insurance carrier shall
allocate funds to a standby trust fund for distribution to a qualified contractor. It
would be the responsibility of the entity receiving the funds to develop a proposal for
accomplishing the mitigation project goals. USACE in coordination with the IRT would
have the ability to review and approve the plan prior to implementation.
2. If any portion of the AMFA is drawn upon pursuant to this Section then the Bank
Sponsor shall replenish the AMFA to the amount specified in Table 1 within 90
calendar days after written notice from USACE.
3. The insurance that constitutes the AMFA will be renewed every two years over the
course of the monitoring period. At each renewal the amount covered by this
insurance will reflect the remaining budget left for monitoring and adaptive
management as specified in Table 1. The final AMFA shall be released after all
Performance Standards have been met and all adaptive management, if any, has been
completed, as evidenced by:
• timely submission of all required annual reports:
• the third anniversary of the completion of all Remedial Action, if any, in
accordance with the Adaptive Management Plan(s);
• an on-site inspection by the IRT; and
• written approval from the IRT.
Long -Term Management Fund
The Bank Sponsor will fully fund the Long -Term Management Fund at the time of closing of the
Conservation Easement. The Long -Term Management Fund amount has been determined by the
Conservation Easement Holder to be $30,375 and has been contractually agreed upon by the Bank
Sponsor. This budget will fully provide for the tasks and responsibilities of long-term stewardship for the
site as described in the Mitigation Plan. The calculation of the Stewardship Fees is provided below.

ATLANTIC COAST
ICONSERVANCM
Calculation of Stewardship Fees — Hair Sheep Creek Mitigation Bank (M201901A)
Landowner Name: Hair Sheep Creek Mitigation Bank
Acreage: 12.5
Existing Structures: 0
Permitted New Structures: 0
Other Factors: The Hair Sheep Creek Mitigation Bank consists of 12.5 acres of
agricultural land off Haystack Road in Mt. Airy, North Carolina 27030 partially
constituting tax parcels #499902865621 and #499900887042 in Surry County, North
Carolina. The property is composed of two subparcels of `hay/pasture" field
adjacent to unnamed headwaters of Cooks Creek. The owners wish to reserve the
right to construct an in lieu mitigation project. The property may not be subdivided
for the purpose of residential development or be sold as multiple undeveloped
parcels, but shall be held by the same owner(s) as a single undivided tract.

Calculation of Stewardship Fees — Hair Sheep Creek Mitigation Bank (M201901A)
ADMINISTRATION:
Secretarial $55 x 1 = 55
Misc./Info Inquiry $55 x 1 = 55
Inspection Follow-up $55 x 1 = 55
Reserved Structures $100 x 0 = 0
Administration Subtotal SL65
INSPECTION & ADMINISTRATION SUBTOTAL $1,015
STEWARDSHIP SUBTOTAL (SUBTOTAL - .04) $25,375
CONSERVATION DEFENSE FUND DEDUCTIBLE: $5,000
TOTAL REQUESTED STEWARDSHIP FEES
2
$30,375
Billing
Total
Rate Hours
Cost Us
INSPECTION:
Travel (round trip)
$50 x 11 =
550
Site Walk
$100 x 1 =
100
Historic Review
$100 x 1 =
100
Post Preparation
$100 x 1 =
100
Inspection Subtotal
$850
ADMINISTRATION:
Secretarial $55 x 1 = 55
Misc./Info Inquiry $55 x 1 = 55
Inspection Follow-up $55 x 1 = 55
Reserved Structures $100 x 0 = 0
Administration Subtotal SL65
INSPECTION & ADMINISTRATION SUBTOTAL $1,015
STEWARDSHIP SUBTOTAL (SUBTOTAL - .04) $25,375
CONSERVATION DEFENSE FUND DEDUCTIBLE: $5,000
TOTAL REQUESTED STEWARDSHIP FEES
2
$30,375

Table 1. Cost Summary for Hair Sheep Stream Restoration Site
A. Land Component
Cost
Financial Assurance
Easement Cost
$186,000
NA
Settlement Costs
$3,000
NA
Land Survey
$10,000
NA
Legal Costs
$12,500
NA
Sub Total Land
$211,500
B. Assessment Component
Cost
Restoration Assessment
$19,000
NA
Reference Characterization
$3000
NA
Prospectus
$10,000
NA
NEPA Clearance
$7,500
NA
Archeology
$5,000
NA
Sub Total Assessment
$44,500
C. Design Component
Cost
Topo Survey— Base Mapping
$9,000
NA
Design Criteria — Mitigation Plan
$26,000
NA
Final Design Plans
$29,000
NA
MBI
$30,000
NA
Supplemental Design
$9,000
NA
Permitting
$12,000
NA
Sub Total Design
$115,000

D. Construction Cost
Land Improvements (fence, wells, etc.)
107,000
CFA -100%
Grading
342,000
CFA — 100%
Sediment and Erosion Control
22,000
CFA —100%
Planting
10,000
CFA — 100%
Construction Survey and As -Built Plans
10,000
CFA —100%
Sub Total Construction
$491,000
E. Monitoring Cost*
Baseline/As-Built Report
$24,000
Year 1-2 AM FA ($134,000)
Year 1 Report
$13,000
Year 2 Report
$14,500
Year 3 Report
$14,500
Year 3-4 AM FA ($82,500)
Year 4 Report
$8,500
Year 5 Report
$16,000
Year 5-6 AMFA ($59,500)
Year 6 Report
$10,500
Year 7 Report
$19,000
Year 7-8 AMFA ($33,000)
Closeout Report
$14,000
Subtotal Monitoring
$134,000
F. Maintenance*
Year 1
$15,000
Year 1-2 AMFA ($56,000)
Year 2
$10,000
Year 3
$10,000
Year 3-4 AMFA ($31,000)
Year 4
$5,000
Year 5
$5,000
Year 5-6 AM FA ($16,000)
Year 6
$5,000
Year 7
$3,000
Year 7-8 AM FA ($6,000)

Closeout
$3,000
Subtotal Maintenance
$56,000
Total Project
$1,052,000
*Monitoring and Maintenance Tasks combined create the total AMFA value.
Draft Insurance Binder is included below

4
CONSERVATION
U N I T E D
Cover Letter to Draft Binder
Compensatory Mitigation
Insurance Policy
Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank
Wilmington District of the Army
Corps of Engineers
Presented by:
Chris Baker,
Insurance United dba Conservation United
4711 E Falcon Dr. Ste. 322
Mesa, AZ 85215
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
24 -Hour Service: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Insurance United License: #1000428224

January 16, 2019
Mr. Steven Kichefski
Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, Asheville Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Suite 208
Asheville, NC 28801
828-271-7980 Ext. 4234
Dear Mr. Kichefski,
Thank you for reviewing the casualty insurance policy satisfying financial assurance
requirements for the Construction Period and Monitoring Years 1 and 2 on the Hair
Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank under the KCI Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Banking
Instrument. The draft binder materially represents the policy jacket as it will appear
upon binding and includes the declaration pages, policy body, and all endorsements.
The Wilmington District Amendatory Endorsement is on pages 24-25 of the PDF. This
Amendatory Endorsement exerts legally binding changes to the underlying body of the
policy. The policy and all endorsements have been previously approved and bound to
satisfy financial assurance requirements on multiple banks in the Wilmington District.
The Policy will be bound for one year, and can be extended through modification. The
specific policy period dates will be adjusted to reflect the date of final approval and
binding, at which point signatures and a policy number will also be added and the
watermarks designating "specimen" or "draft" will be removed.
Please do not hesitate to call me at [phone] with any questions.
Best regards,
M --
Chris Baker
Principal, Insurance United, Inc., dba Conservation United

Nautilus Insurance Companycq-
An Arizona Corporation b a W R. Bovey company
COMMERCIAL LINES POLICY
THIS POLICY IS NOT OBTAINED PRIMARILY FOR PERSONAL, FAMILY OR HOUSEHOLD
PURPOSES.
THIS POLICY CONSISTS OF:
- Declarations;
- Common Policy Conditions; and
- One or more Coverage Parts. A Coverage Part consists of:
- One or more Coverage Forms; and
- Applicable Forms and Endorsements.
In Witness Whereof, we have caused this policy to be executed and attested, and, if required by state law, this policy shall
not be valid unless countersigned by our authorized representative.
Secretary President and CEO
Administrative Office:
7233 East Butherus Drive, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
Service Office:
101 Hudson Street, Suite 2550, Jersey City, NJ 07302 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone]
E001 J 03 17 Page 1 of 1

BERKLEY
ENVIRONMENTAL
a division of Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers
Claim
Services
By knowing your industry and
speaking your language, our
claim professionals can focus
on meeting your unique
business needs and offer you
the superior claim service you
deserve through responsible
claim management and
aggressive mitigation.
We are confident our
dedicated teams of claim
professionals will add value to
your organization and help you
succeed in accomplishing your
risk management objectives.
Reporting a Claim
It is vitally important that you contact us as soon as possible when an accident happens.
When an accident takes place, you can call, fax or email us.
Under all circumstances, you must follow the claim reporting requirements of your policy
including, but not limited to, providing us written notice of the claim.
Automobile
Claims
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email:
Environmental.auto.claims
@berkleysum.com
Mailing Address:
101 Hudson Street
25th Floor, Suite 2550
Jersey City, NJ 07302
General Liability
And Professional
Liability Claims
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email:
Environmental. liability.claims
@berkleysum.com
Mailing Address:
101 Hudson Street
25th Floor, Suite 2550
Jersey City, NJ 07302
Workers
Compensation
Claims
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email:
Environmental.wc.claims
@berkleysum.com
Mailing Address:
PO Box 141299
Irving, TX 75014-1233
Street Address:
600 E. Las Colinas Blvd,
Suite 1400
Irving, TX 75039
Berkley Environmental Support Team (BEST)
We understand environmental
spills and releases can be
extremely stressful events.
That's why we're proud to offer you
a free fully staffed 24 hour — 7 day
a week emergency response call
center staffed with experienced
professionals with a national
network of emergency response
providers able to file agency spill
notifications.
Call [phone] to report
your environmental spill or
release.
Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers (a W. R. Berkley Company)
Providing Innovative Solutions
www.berkleysum.com
Environmental Claims
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Mailing Address:
101 Hudson Street
25th Floor, Suite 2550
Jersey City, NJ 07302
In Case of Emergencies, Weekends or Holidays
Phone: [phone]
THE MATERIAL IN THIS PUBLICATION IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A REPRESENTATION OF COVERAGE
THAT MAY EXIST IN ANY PARTICULAR SITUATION UNDER A POLICY ISSUED BY A MEMBER COMPANY OF BERKLEY SPECIALTY UNDERWRITING MANAGERS OR ITS
AFFILIATES. ALL CONDITIONS OF COVERAGE, TERMS AND LIMITATIONS ARE DEFINED AND PROVIDED FOR IN THE POLICY. PROGRAMS OR PRODUCTS MAY NOT
BE AVAILABLE IN ALL STATES AND POLICY FEATURES MAY VARY BY STATE.
ENV DIR CLAIMS 06 16 Page 1 of 1

INTERLINE
IL 12 02 01 16
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY
OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSET CONTROL (OFAC)
EXCLUSION ENDORSEMENT
No insurer shall be deemed to provide cover and no insurer shall be liable to pay any claim or provide any benefit
hereunder to the extent that the provision of such cover, payment of such claim or provision of such benefit would
expose that insurer to any sanction, prohibition or restriction under United Nations resolutions or the trade or
economic sanctions laws or regulations of the European Union, United Kingdom or the United States.
IL 12 02 01 16 Page 1 of 1

NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY
Scottsdale, Arizona
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER: To Be Assigned Upon Binding
INSURED'S NAME AND ADDRESS: PRODUCER'S NAME AND ADDRESS:
Sponsor Name: KCI Technologies, Inc American Risk Management Resources Network, LLC
Sponsor Address: 936 Ridgebrook Rd. 7780 Elmwood Ave., Suite 130
City, State, Zip: Sparta, NC 21152 Middleton, WI 53562-3135
Producer No.: 40000500
POLICY PERIOD: One Year. XXXX to XXXX at 12:01 a.m. Standard Time at your mailing address shown above.
IN RETURN FOR THE PAYMENT OF PREMIUM, AND SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS OF THIS POLICY, WE
AGREE WITH YOU TO PROVIDE THE INSURANCE AS STATED IN THIS POLICY.
LIMITS OF INSURANCE:
Effective Coverage Period Per Claim Total All Claims
TBD to TBD (One Year- Construction) $ 491,000 $491,000
TBD to TBD (Monitoring Year 1) $ 190,000 $190,000
TBD to TBD ( Monitoring Year 2) $ 190,000 $190,000
At the end of each Effective Coverage Period, the limit of insurance shall expire and will be replaced by the limits in the
subsequent Effective Coverage Period until policy expiration.
NOTICE TO THE INSURED:
"THIS INSURANCE COMPANY WITH WHICH THIS COVERAGE HAS BEEN PLACED IS
NOT LICENSED BY THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO ITS
SUPERVISION. IN THE EVENT OF THE INSOLVENCY OF THE INSURANCE COMPANY,
LOSSES UNDER THIS POLICY WILL NOT BE PAID BY ANY STATE INSURANCE
GUARANTY OR SOLVENCY FUND."
© 2006 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide
Insurance Company. All rights reserved. © 1985-2006 by Insurance Services Office, Inc. material used by permission.
ENV CMI DEC 12 16 A BERKLEY COMPANY Page 1 of 2

RETROACTIVE DATE (APPLICABLE TO CLAIMS MADE COVERAGES):
SEE ENDORSEMENTS ATTACHED TO THIS POLICY.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS:
® Corporation ❑ Individual ❑ Joint Venture ❑ Partnership
❑ Limited Liability Corporation ❑ Other (describe):
SCHEDULE OF COVERED LOCATION(S):
DESCRIPTION OF THE BANK: Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank, in Surry County, NC. under KCI Yadkin 01 UMBI
RETENTIONS
$ 0 Deductible Per Claim
TOTAL PREMIUM FOR THIS POLICY: $10,8877.50 100% Minimum Earned Premium
FORMS AND ENDORSEMENTS (Other than applicable forms and endorsements shown elsewhere in the
policy):
Forms and Endorsements applying to this policy and made part of this policy at the time of issue:
SEE SCHEDULE OF FORMS AND ENDORSEMENTS
NAME AND ADDRESS OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC
Three Ravinia Drive, Suite 500
Atlanta, GA 30346
Phone No.: [phone], See the claims notice attached to this policy for claims contact information.
THIS DECLARATION, TOGETHER WITH THE COMMON POLICY CONDITIONS AND COVERAGE FORM(S) AND
ANY ENDORSEMENT(S), COMPLETE THE ABOVE NUMBERED POLICY.
Countersigned:
Issue Date: 04/25/2017
By:
Authorized Representative
© 2006 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide
Insurance Company. All rights reserved. © 1985-2006 by Insurance Services Office, Inc. material used by permission.
ENV CMI DEC 12 16 A BERKLEY COMPANY Page 2 of 2

SCHEDULE OF FORMS AND ENDORSEMENTS
Policy Number: To Be Assigned Upon Binding
Named Insured: KCI Technologies, Inc.
FORMS ATTACHED TO AND MADE A PART OF THIS POLICY AT INCEPTION:
FORM NUMBER
FORM TITLE
E001 J (03/17)
Nautilus Policy Jacket
ENV DIR CLAIMS 06 16
Policyholder Notice — Claim Reporting Information
IL 12 02 01 16
Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) Exclusion Endorsement
CMI DEC 12 16
Compensatory Mitigation Declarations
ENV FORM 02 14
Schedule of Forms and Endorsements
CMI 6600 12 16
Compensatory Mitigation Insurance Insuring Agreement
S020 (04-05)
Service of Suit
ENV 2012 01 12
Earned Premium and Flat Rate
ENV 2225 01 15
Exclusion of Certified Acts of Terrorism
BSUM 1200 (11-11)
Minimum Earned Premium
CMI 6601 12 16
Covered Location Endorsement
CMI 6602 12 18
Indemnification Endorsement (KCI Technologies, Inc.)
CMI 6604 03 17
Wilmington District Amendatory Endorsement
ENV FORM 02 14 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., used with permission. Page 1 of 1

COMPENSATORY MITIGATION INSURANCE
THIS FORM PROVIDES CLAIMS MADE AND REPORTED COVERAGE. PLEASE READ THE ENTIRE FORM
CAREFULLY.
Various provisions in this policy restrict coverage. Read the entire policy carefully to determine rights, duties, and
what is and is not covered.
Throughout this policy the words "you" and `your' refer to the Named Insured shown in the Declarations, and any
other person or organization qualifying as an Insured under this policy. The words "we", "us", and `our' refer to
the Company providing this insurance. "You" and "your" do not refer to the Authorizing Agency Other than
headings, words and phases that appear in bold have special meaning. Refer to SECTION II - DEFINITIONS.
This policy provides Claims Made and Reported Coverage and has Claims reporting requirements. Coverage
provided herein only applies to a Claim first made against the Named Insured during the Policy Period, and
reported to us in writing during the Effective Coverage Period in which the Claim is made. This policy does not
include a duty to defend or to pay defense costs. Notice of a Default or Deficiency Notice is not a Claim and
does not trigger coverage under the policy.
The application filed and approved Mitigation Banking Instrument, supplemental materials, and information
submitted therewith, are the basis of this policy and are incorporated into and constitute a part of this policy. Any
materials and information received in application for the policy will be maintained on file with the Company and
shall be deemed to be attached to the policy as if physically attached. As a condition precedent to coverage, it is
agreed by all Insureds that the statements made in the application and supplemental materials are
representations made on behalf of all Insureds, that they are material, and that this policy is issued by the
Company in reliance upon the truth of such representations.
In consideration of the payment of the premium and the undertaking of the Insured(s) to pay the Indemnification
Obligation set out in Indemnification Endorsement attached to this Policy, and subject to the Limits of Insurance
set out in SECTION IV — LIMITS OF INSURANCE AND DEDUCTIBLE and the Declarations, and the exclusions,
conditions, and other terms of this policy, the Company agrees with the Insured(s) as follows:
SECTION I — INSURING AGREEMENT
To pay on behalf of the Named Insured the amount of Financial Assurances for which the Named Insured
becomes legally obligated to pay as a result of a Claim first made against it during the Policy Period, by reason
of a Default under a Mitigation Banking Instrument, to which this insurance applies, provided that, as a
condition precedent to coverage, the Claim is reported, in writing, to the Company by the Named Insured or by
the Authorizing Agency on the Named Insured's behalf during the Effective Coverage Period in which the
Claim is first made against the Named Insured.
We will have the right to adjust, pay or settle any Claim seeking Financial Assurances as described in Section
V. Reporting, Adjustment & Settlement; and
We may at our discretion investigate any Default and settle any Claim that may result. But:
1) The amount we will pay for Financial Assurances under this policy is limited as described in
SECTION IV. LIMITS OF INSURANCE AND DEDUCTIBLE; and
2) Our obligation to adjust or pay any Claim under an Effective Coverage Period ends when we have
paid the limit of insurance applicable to that Effective Coverage Period, in the payment or settlement
of Financial Assurances.
© 2016 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
CMI Page 1 of 9

SECTION II - DEFINITIONS
1. Adaptive Management Plan means the development of a management strategy that results in a written
plan as defined in33.CFR 332,4(c)(12) that anticipates likely challenges associated with Compensatory
Mitigation Projects and provides for the implementation of actions to address those challenges, as well
as unforeseen changes to those projects.
2. Authorizing Agency — means the Department of the Army, the District Engineer, or other person, entity
or agency designated by the Department of the Army, that retains the sole and final authority under 33
CFR 332 to negotiate, determine, approve and enforce the terms of the Mitigation Banking Instrument,
and any other documents established thereunder
3. Claim means a written demand received by the Named Insured from the Authorizing Agency, or from
the Authorizing Agency on the Named Insured's behalf seeking payment of Financial Assurances as
a result of a Default under the Mitigation Banking Instrument.
4. Compensatory Mitigation as defined in 33 CFR 332.2 means the restoration (re-establishment or
rehabilitation), establishment (creation), enhancement, and/or in certain circumstances preservation of
aquatic resources for the purposes of offsetting unavoidable adverse impacts which remain after all
appropriate and practicable avoidance and minimization has been achieved.
5. Compensatory Mitigation Project means the site or sites scheduled in the Declarations to the Policy at
which the Named Insured is implementing a Mitigation Plan approved by the Authorizing Agency
under 33 CFR 332.
6. Default means a written and final determination made by the Authorizing Agency that the Named
Insured has failed to successfully implement a Mitigation Plan, in accordance with the Performance
Standards, at a Compensatory Mitigation Project site scheduled in the Declarations to this policy, but
only if such determination is made following:
(1) a period of time more than one year (or shorter period as determined by the Authorizing Agency in
accordance with law) after the Authorizing Agency has issued a Deficiency Notice for that
Mitigation Plan or Compensatory Mitigation Project site, and
(2) the Named Insured's best efforts to mitigate any deficiencies noticed by the Authorizing Agency in
any prior Deficiency Notice for that Mitigation Plan or Compensatory Mitigation Project site and
to prevent the Default;
Default shall not include any determination by the Authorizing Agency that the Named Insured has
failed to comply with, or breached, any other term or condition of the Mitigation Banking Instrument or
other document thereunder, other than the Performance Standards in a Mitigation Plan for a
Compensatory Mitigation Project site scheduled in the Declarations to this policy, or any resultant
suspension or termination of the Mitigation Banking Instrument as a result of such non-compliance or
breach.
7. Deficiency Notice means a written notice issued by the Authorizing Agency to the Named Insured:
(1) advising that it is not progressing towards, or on track to, or meeting the Performance Standards set
out in a Mitigation Plan for a Compensatory Mitigation Project site; and
(2) requesting that the Named Insured implement measures to correct the deficiencies, including but not
limited to implementation of an Adaptive Management Plan, or modifications to the existing
Mitigation Plan, and
© 2016 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
CMI Page 2 of 9

(3) modifying, decreasing or suspending credit sales of the Mitigation Bank until the Named Insured
successfully completes measures to correct deficiencies in the implementation of a Mitigation Plan
for a Compensatory Mitigation Project site.
8. Effective Coverage Period means the annual term set forth in the Declarations;
9. Financial Assurances means the amount of reasonable and necessary costs to remedy a Default
determination by the Authorizing Agency, which amount shall be determined by the lesser of the
following:
a. Mitigation Expenses required to successfully complete the Compensatory Mitigation at the
Compensatory Mitigation Project site from which the Default has been determined; or
b. Mitigation Expenses required to provide replacement Compensatory Mitigation at another site; or
c. the actual costs to purchase replacement mitigation credits from another mitigation bank and any
legal fees associated with the purchase;
Mitigation Expenses under (a) and (b) above means the direct costs of engineers, contractors and
subcontractors, to design, plan, engineer, construct, and implement the Compensatory Mitigation work
at the site, exclusive of profit or markup of any kind by, or in favor of, the Named Insured. Direct costs
may include reasonable administrative and management costs incurred by such engineers, contractors,
and subcontractors, but only to the extent such costs are directly and exclusively allocable to the actual
Compensatory Mitigation work being performed at the site,
Mitigation Expenses under (b) above includes the cost to acquire a replacement property and includes
legal fees associated with the acquisition.
Mitigation Expenses under (a) and (b) above shall not include (i) any costs for insurance or bonds,
including those costs attendant to securing and reporting in connection with such insurance and bonds
(ii) legal fees of any kind, except those noted in (b) and (c) above, and (iii) cost related to reporting and
other obligations under this policy, (iv) any costs, charges or expenses (including salaries, benefits, or
fringes) of the Named Insured, unless such costs are directly attributable to the implementation of the
tasks and activities for the Compensatory Mitigation and the Company has approved and consented to
the work and costs prior to them being incurred.
10. Insured means:
(a) The Named Insured but only with respect to Liability incurred from the default of a Mitigation
Banking Instrument to which this insurance applies;
(b) The Named Insured's current or former members and partners, and their spouses, but only with
respect to liability incurred from the Named Insured's Default of a Mitigation Banking Instrument,
to which this insurance applies;
(c) The Named Insured's current or former directors, executive officers, and stockholders, and their
spouses, but only with respect to liability incurred from the Named Insured's Default of a Mitigation
Banking Instrument, to which this insurance applies;
© 2016 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
CMI Page 3 of 9

11. Mitigation Bank means the site, or suite of sites, where aquatic resources are being restored,
reestablished, rehabilitated, established, created, enhanced, and/or preserved as part of the
Compensatory Mitigation Project governed by the Mitigation Banking Instrument as shown on the
Covered Location Endorsement.
12. Mitigation Banking Instrument means the legal document scheduled in the Declarations to this policy,
provided that such plan is prepared, approved, filed, and documented in compliance with applicable law.
13. Mitigation Plan means the plan prepared by the Named Insured per 33 CFR 332.4 c(2) through c(14),
and approved by the Authorizing Agency, for Compensatory Mitigation to be performed at each
Compensatory Mitigation Project site as shown on the Covered Location Endorsement.
14. Named Insured means the entity listed in the Declarations to this policy that has executed the approved
Mitigation Banking Instrument.
15. Policy Period means the period set forth in the Declarations, or any shorter period arising as a result of
cancellation or termination of the policy.
16. Performance Standards as defined in 33 CFR 332.2 means observable or measurable physical
(including hydrological), chemical and/or biological attributes that are used to determine if a
Compensatory Mitigation Project meets its objectives.
SECTION III — EXCLUSIONS
This insurance does not apply to Claims, Defaults, or Financial Assurances based upon, arising out of, or
relating to:
1. An Act of God, or any natural catastrophe or disaster;
2. Liability assumed by the Named Insured under any contract or agreement, including but not limited to
liability for payment of attorneys fees, termination fees, consequential or liquidated damages, or liabilities
of another pursuant to any indemnification agreement, except for liability to pay Financial Assurances
as a result of a Default under a Mitigation Banking Instrument.
3. Any legal fees, costs, or expenses (including expert or consultant fees) incurred in the defense of any
liability or obligation of the Named Insured for any reason.
4. Fluctuation in, short fall of, or devaluation of, the monetary value of, or marketability of, mitigation credits
(or other equivalent credits), or of any real property, including a site at which Compensatory Mitigation
is being performed, or is planned to be performed, under the Mitigation Banking Instrument.
SECTION IV — LIMITS OF INSURANCE AND DEDUCTIBLE
1. The Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations and the rules below fix the most we will pay on behalf
of the Named Insured regardless of the number of Defaults, Claims, Financial Assurances, Mitigation
Plans, or Compensatory Mitigation Project sites.
2. The "Total All Claims" Limit set forth in the Declarations is the most we will pay on behalf of the Named
Insured for Financial Assurances as a result of all Claims first made against the Named Insured
during the scheduled Effective Coverage Period, and reported in writing to us, during that same
scheduled Effective Coverage Period.
3. Subject to item 2 above, the "Per Claim" Limit set forth in the Declarations is the most we will pay on
behalf of the Named Insured for Financial Assurances as a result of any one Claim first made against
the Named Insured during the scheduled Effective Coverage Period, and reported in writing to us,
during that same scheduled Effective Coverage Period.
© 2016 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
CMI Page 4 of 9

4. Subject to items 2 and 3 above, the maximum Limits of Insurance we will pay for any Claim made during
a scheduled Effective Coverage Period shall be the limits corresponding to the scheduled Effective
Coverage Period stated in the Declarations, in which the Claim is first made against the Named Insured
and reported to us in writing.
At the end of each Effective Coverage Period, the limit of insurance shall expire and will no longer be
available for payment of any new or additional Claim not already made against the Named Insured and
reported to us in writing before expiration of the Effective Coverage Period.
At the end of each Effective Coverage Period, the limit of available insurance shall also be replaced by
the "Per Claim" Limit and "Total All Claims" Limit scheduled in the subsequent Effective Coverage
Period.
5. One or more Claims made against the Named Insured, and reported in writing to the Company, that
arise out of the same, interrelated, repeated, or associated Defaults in a single Mitigation Plan, or at a
single Compensatory Mitigation Project site, shall be considered a single Claim, and the Company's
total liability for Financial Assurance from that Claim shall be subject to the Limits of Insurance
corresponding to the "Per Claim" Limit for the Effective Coverage Period set forth in the Declarations (or
any reduced or modified Limit established by endorsement to this policy) and effective at the time the
initial Claim was first made against the Named Insured and first reported in writing to the Company.
6. The "Per Claim" Deductible set forth in the Declarations for each Effective Coverage Period shall apply
to each and every Claim first made against the Named Insured, and reported to us in writing, during that
Effective Coverage Period.
The "Total All Claims" Deductible set forth in the Declarations for each Effective Coverage Period shall
apply in the aggregate for all Claims first made against the Named Insured, and reported to us in writing,
during that Effective Coverage Period.
The Deductible amount shall be the Insured's obligation to pay and shall apply to all payments the
Company makes under the policy. While payment for Claims is included within the respective Deductible
Amounts set forth in the Declarations, the Insured(s) shall immediately reimburse the Company for any
payment advanced against a Deductible Amount,
The Deductible amount applies to all payments the Company makes under this Policy and shall reduce
the available and payable Limits of Insurance set forth in the Declarations (or in any endorsement to this
Policy which modifies that Limit).
SECTION V — REPORTING, ADJUSTMENT & SETTLEMENT
1. NOTICE OF A DEFICIENCY
The Named Insured shall provide written notice to the Company as soon as possible of any Deficiency
Notice received by the Named Insured from the Authorizing Agency. The Named Insured shall
forward to the Company a copy of the Deficiency Notice and any other communication or information
related thereto, including the following:
a) Details of the Compensatory Mitigation Project site and Mitigation Plan for which the Deficiency
Notice was received;
b) The Named Insured's plan to remedy the deficiencies noted by the Authorizing Agency, including
any planned modifications to the Mitigation Plan and/or its Adaptive Management Plan in order to
prevent a Default under the Mitigation Banking Instrument.
© 2016 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
CMI Page 5 of 9

c) Any other information necessary for the Company to understand the circumstances surrounding the
Deficiency Notice and/or the Named Insured's plan to meet the applicable Performance
Standards and prevent a Default under the Mitigation Banking Instrument.
The Named Insured shall have the duty to use its best efforts to mitigate a Deficiency Notice in order to
prevent a Default under the Mitigation Banking Instrument. The Company shall have the right to
investigate any Deficiency Notice. The Named Insured shall cooperate with the Company's
investigation, and make available upon the Company's request, documents for review and personnel for
interview, all without charge to the Company. Notice of a Deficiency is not a Claim and shall not trigger
coverage under the policy.
2. NOTICE OF A DEFAULT or CLAIM
The Named Insured shall provide immediate written notice to the Company of any Claim made against
the Named Insured, or of any determination by the Authorizing Agency that the Named Insured is in
Default of the Mitigation Banking Instrument. The Named Insured shall immediately forward to the
Company every demand, notice, or other communication related to the Claim or the determination of
Default as well as the following information:
a) Details of the Compensatory Mitigation Project site and Mitigation Plan determined to be in
Default and for which the Claim is being made;
b) An explanation of the events and circumstances leading to the Default, including the specific basis
and reasons upon which the Default has been determined;
c) A description of the mitigation efforts undertaken to prevent or cure the Default (and the deficiencies
leading thereto), including a detailed description of the amount of funds expended and the type of
activity conducted;
d) An estimate of the costs necessary to cure the Default;
e) Any other information necessary for the Company to understand the circumstances surrounding the
Default or Claim.
The Company shall have the right to investigate any Default or Claim noticed under the policy. The
Named Insured shall cooperate with the Company's investigation and upon the Company's request, shall
assist in the investigation and settlement of the Claim, and make available to the Company, documents
for review and personnel for interview, all without charge to the Company. Notice of a Default is not a
Claim and shall not trigger coverage under the policy.
In the event that the Authorizing Agency first provides notice of a Claim to the Company, the Company
may investigate and pay or adjust such claim as provided herein in its sole discretion without any duty to
make inquiry of the Insured with respect to the Claim, and such payment or adjustment shall reduce the
Limits of Liability remaining under the policy. The Insured shall not be released from any of its obligations
to the Company under this policy by virtue of any such payment or adjustment, including its duties to
indemnify the Company, according to the Indemnification Endorsement attached to this policy.
3. CLAIM ADJUSTMENT and SETTLEMENT
The Insured(s) agree that that the Company shall have the right to adjust, pay or settle any Claim, to
which this insurance applies, at its sole discretion, without the Insured(s) consent, subject to the
available and remaining Limits of Insurance for the applicable Effective Coverage Period, and that such
adjustment, payment, or settlement may include, but not be limited to, the following actions:
1) Payment of Financial Assurances to a designee or standby trust, as directed by the Authorizing
Agency, for distribution by such designee or trustee in accordance with the Authorizing Agency's
© 2016 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
CMI Page 6 of 9

instructions, pursuant to the Authorizing Agency's authority under the Mitigation Banking
Instrument and/or 33 CFR 332; or
2) Payment of Financial Assurances to a replacement contractor, as designated and retained by the
Authorizing Agency or its designee (subject to the Company's written consent and approval), to
either perform replacement Compensatory Mitigation at another site or to complete the
Compensatory Mitigation at the Compensatory Mitigation Project site from which the Default has
been determined;
The Company may make such inquiries and investigations of the Claim as it deems expedient, including
inquiries to the Named Insured or the Authorizing Agency regarding the Claim, and payment of
Financial Assurances.
The Insured(s) agree that no Claim or Financial Assurances will be paid without the prior written
consent and approval of the Authorizing Agency, and that the Company shall incur no liability to the
Insured(s) resulting from such inquiries and/or resulting from the non-payment of any Claim or Financial
Assurances for which the Authorizing Agency has not consented and/or approved. The Insured(s)
shall not admit liability or settle any Claim without the Company's consent. The Insured(s) shall not be
released from any of their duties or obligations to the Company under this policy by virtue of any payment
or adjustment of a Claim by the Company, including the Insured(s) duties to indemnify the Company,
according to the Indemnification Endorsement attached to this policy.
SECTION VI — CONDITIONS
1. LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE COMPANY
No action shall lie against the Company unless, as a condition precedent thereto, there shall have been
full compliance with all of terms of this policy, nor until the amount of the Named Insured's obligation to
pay shall have been finally determined either by judgment against the Named Insured after actual trial or
by written agreement of the Named Insured, the Authorizing Agency and the Company. No person or
organization shall have any right under this policy to join the Company as a party to any action against
any Insured to determine the Insured's liability, nor shall the Company be impleaded by any Insured or
his legal representative.
2. TRANSFER OF POLICY
Your rights and duties under this policy may not be assigned or transferred without our written consent.
3. BANKRUPTCY
Bankruptcy or insolvency of the Named Insured will not relieve the Company of its obligations under this
policy, nor shall it relieve the Insured(s) of their indemnification obligations to the Company.
4. CANCELLATION AND TERMINATION
a. The Company may cancel the policy by mailing to the Named Insured at the last known address and
the Authorizing Agency written notice of not less than One Hundred and Twenty days (120)
thereafter such cancellation shall be effective. The notice shall include the reason for cancellation
which may include:
i. The policy is no longer needed;
ii. Non-payment of premium;
iii. Fraud, material misrepresentation or intentional concealment of information which increases
the risk originally Insured; or
iv. The Insured's failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this policy including the
failure to pay any deductible or premium when due.
© 2016 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
CMI Page 7 of 9

b. Upon release by the Authorizing Agency pursuant to applicable law, the Insured may cancel the
policy by mailing or delivering written notice to us stating when the cancellation shall be effective.
Termination by other than cancellation:
The policy may terminate without the approval of the Authorizing Agency at the earlier of:
1) The expiration date of the policy as shown in item 2. of the Declarations page;
2) A written acknowledgement, certification or other legally equivalent determination by the
Authorizing Agency that Mitigation Bank has closed after having met the performance
standards set forth in the Mitigation Banking Instrument.
Cancellation or termination of the policy shall be subject to release of the company by the Authorizing
Agency. Upon the effective date of such release all obligations on the part of the Company hereunder
shall automatically cease and neither the Authorizing Agency or the Insured shall have further
recourse against the Company with respect to unpaid Financial Assurances including existing or
future liabilities or obligations arising from claim(s) previously reported or pending under the Policy.
5. CHANGES
Notice to any agent or knowledge possessed by any agent or by any other person shall not effect a
waiver or change in any part of this Policy or estop the Company from asserting any right under the terms
of this Policy; nor shall the terms of this Policy be waived or changed, except by endorsement issued by
the Company to form a part of this Policy.
6. CHOICE OF LAW
The Named Insured and the Company agree that all matters or disputes arising hereunder, including any
questions relating to the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of this policy, the meaning,
interpretation or operation of any term, condition, definition or provision, or the fulfillment of any party of
any obligation with respect to the policy, shall be determined in accordance with the law and practices of
the State of New York.
7. COOPERATION
The Named Insured shall cooperate with the Company, and offer all reasonable assistance in the
Company's investigations. The Company may require that the Named Insured submit to examination
under oath, and attend hearings, depositions and trials. In the course of investigation, the Company may
require written statements or the Named Insured's attendance at meetings with the Company. The
Insured must assist the Company in effecting settlement, securing and providing evidence and obtaining
the attendance of witnesses.
8. COVERAGE TERRITORY
The coverage provided under this policy shall only apply to Mitigation Banks located within the United
States of America.
9. AUDIT AND INSPECTION
a) We may examine and audit your books and records as they relate to this policy at anytime during the
policy period and up to three (3) years after the end of the policy period;
b) we may be permitted but not obligated to, interview persons employed by you; or
c) we shall be permitted but not obligated to inspect, sample and monitor the Named Insured's
Mitigation Bank during the policy period or any time thereafter. Neither our right to make
inspections, sample and monitor nor the actual undertaking thereof nor any report thereon shall
© 2016 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
CMI Page 8 of 9

constitute an undertaking, on behalf of the Named Insured or others, to determine or warrant that the
Mitigation Bank or operations are safe, healthful, or conform to acceptable engineering practice or
are in compliance with any law, rule or regulation. The Named Insured agrees to provide
appropriate personnel to assist our representatives during any inspection.
10. OTHER INSURANCE
a. This insurance is primary, except when b. below applies.
b. This insurance is excess:
1) When stated in the Declarations to apply in excess of, or contingent upon the absence of, other
appropriate instruments; or
2) Over any other bonds, reserves, escrows, trust funds, credits, or valid and collectible insurance
available to the Named Insured to cover Claims for Financial Assurances under the Mitigation
Banking Instrument; or
3) Over any other appropriate instruments applicable to cover Claims for Financial Assurances
under the Mitigation Banking Instrument.
When this insurance is excess over other valid and collectible appropriate instruments, the
Company shall be obligated to pay only its share of the applicable amount and shall not contribute
with such instruments.
The Insured shall promptly, upon the request of the Company, provide the Company with copies of all
such instruments or documentation.
11. SOLE AGENT
The Named Insured shown in the Declarations shall act on behalf of, and serve as the sole agent for, all
Insureds with respect to the return or payment of any premiums, the issuance by the Company of the
policy, the receipt or acceptance of any endorsements issued to form a part of the policy, or the receiving
of any notices from the Company required by this policy.
12. SUBROGATION
In the event of any payment under this Policy by the Company, the Company shall be subrogated to all of
the rights of recovery that the Insured(s) may have against any person or organization and the
Insured(s) shall execute and deliver instruments and papers and do whatever else is necessary to
secure such rights. The Insured(s) shall do nothing to prejudice such rights.
© 2016 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
CMI Page 9 of 9

ENDORSEMENT
This endorsement forms a part of the policy to which it is attached. Please read it carefully.
SERVICE OF SUIT
Pursuant to any statute of any state, territory or district of the United States which makes provision therefore,
we hereby designate the Superintendent, Commissioner or Director of Insurance or other officer specified for
that purpose in the Statute, or his successor or successors in office, as our true and lawful attorney upon
whom may be served any lawful process in any action, "suit" or proceeding instituted by or on behalf of you or
any beneficiary hereunder arising out of this contract of insurance, and hereby designate the above named as
the person to whom the said officer is authorized to mail such process or a true copy thereof.
It is further agreed that service of process in such "suit" may be made upon Michael Kilgas, or his nominee of
the Company at 7233 East Butherus Drive, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 and that in any "suit' instituted against
any one of them upon this policy, we will abide by the final decision of such Court or of any Appellate Court in
the event of an appeal.
It is agreed that in any state requiring a standard form of policy, insurance hereunder on values or properties in
such state shall attach and cover in accordance with the terms and conditions of such standard form.
S020 (04-05) Page 1 of 1

ENDORSEMENT
This endorsement forms a part of the policy to which it is attached. Please read it carefully.
EARNED PREMIUM AND FLAT RATE
In consideration of the Company's acceptance of this insurance, the Named Insured hereby agrees that the minimum
earned premium(s) due for this policy shall be calculated in accordance with the following.
1. The minimum earned premium due if this policy remains in effect for 90 days or less shall be 100.00% [min earned
percentage] of the amount entered as POLICY PREMIUM on the Declarations page of this policy.
2. In the event of cancellation of this policy by the Named Insured after this policy has been in effective for more than 90
days, the return premium due, if any, shall be computed at a rate equal to ninety percent (90%) of the pro -rata
unearned policy premium, subject, however to final premium adjustment in accordance with our rules and rates. This
policy is not subject to audit.
3. In the event of cancellation of this policy by the Company for reasons other than nonpayment of premium, the earned
premium for this policy shall be computed on a pro -rata basis, subject, however, to final premium adjustment in
accordance with our rules and rates. This policy is not subject to audit.
4. Premiums applicable to any subsequent endorsements will be in addition to the minimum premium shown in the
policy.
5. The amount entered as POLICY PREMIUM on the Declarations page of this policy has been computed on a
composite rate basis as follows:
Exposure Basis
Per $1,000
Estimated Exposure
$871,000
Composite
x Rate Policy Premium
Flat
TOTAL POLICY PREMIUM
$10,887.50
$10,887.50
© 2006 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company. All rights reserved.
© 1985-2006 by Insurance Services Office, Inc., material used by permission.
ENV 2012 01 12 Page 1 of 1

POLICYHOLDER DISCLOSURE
NOTICE OF TERRORISM
INSURANCE COVERAGE
You are hereby notified that under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, as amended, (the "Act"), you have a right to purchase insurance
coverage for losses resulting from acts of terrorism, as defined in Section 102(1) of the Act: The term "act of terrorism" means any act
that is certified by the Secretary of the Treasury—in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Attorney General
of the United States—to be an act of terrorism; to be a violent act or an act that is dangerous to human life, property, or infrastructure;
to have resulted in damage within the United States, or outside the United States in the case of certain air carriers or vessels or the
premises of a United States mission; and to have been committed by an individual or individuals as part of an effort to coerce the
civilian population of the United States or to influence the policy or affect the conduct of the United States Government by coercion.
Coverage under your policy may be affected as follows:
YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT WHERE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED BY THIS POLICY FOR LOSSES RESULTING FROM
CERTIFIED ACTS OF TERRORISM, SUCH LOSSES MAY BE PARTIALLY REIMBURSED BY THE UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT UNDER A FORMULA ESTABLISHED BY FEDERAL LAW. HOWEVER, YOUR POLICY MAY CONTAIN
OTHER EXCLUSIONS WHICH MIGHT AFFECT YOUR COVERAGE, SUCH AS AN EXCLUSION FOR NUCLEAR
EVENTS. UNDER THE FORMULA, THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT GENERALLY REIMBURSES 85% THROUGH
2015; 84% BEGINNING ON JANUARY 1, 2016; 83% BEGINNING ON JANUARY 1, 2017; 82% BEGINNING ON JANUARY
1, 2018; 81% BEGINNING ON JANUYARY 1, 2019 AND 80% BEGINNING ON JANUARY 1, 2010 OF COVERED
TERRORISM LOSSES EXCEEDING THE STATUTORILY ESTABLISHED DEDUCTIBLE PAID BY THE INSURANCE
COMPANY PROVIDING THE COVERAGE. THE PREMIUM CHARGED FOR THIS COVERAGE IS PROVIDED BELOW
AND DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY CHARGES FOR THE PORTION OF LOSS THAT MAY BE COVERED BY THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT UNDER THE ACT.
YOU SHOULD ALSO KNOW THAT THE ACT, CONTAINS A $100 BILLION CAP THAT LIMITS U.S. GOVERNMENT
REIMBURSEMENT AS WELL AS INSURERS' LIABILITY FOR LOSSES RESULTING FROM CERTIFIED ACTS OF
TERRORISM WHEN THE AMOUNT OF SUCH LOSSES IN ANY ONE CALENDAR YEAR EXCEEDS $100 BILLION. IF THE
AGGREGATE INSURED LOSSES FOR ALL INSURERS EXCEED $100 BILLION, YOUR COVERAGE MAY BE REDUCED.
Acceptance or Rejection of Terrorism Insurance Coverage
Nautilus Insurance Company
Policyholder/Applicant's Signature Insurance Company
Christine Koski To Be Assigned Upon Binding
Print Name Policy Number
Date
Includes copyright material of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, used by permission.
TRIPRA 01 (15)
Page 1 of 1
I hereby elect to purchase terrorism coverage, subject to the limitations of the Act, for acts of terrorism
as defined in the Act, for a prospective premium of $ ).
X
I hereby decline to purchase terrorism coverage for certified acts of terrorism. I understand that I will have
no coverage for losses resulting from certified acts of terrorism.
Nautilus Insurance Company
Policyholder/Applicant's Signature Insurance Company
Christine Koski To Be Assigned Upon Binding
Print Name Policy Number
Date
Includes copyright material of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, used by permission.
TRIPRA 01 (15)
Page 1 of 1

POLICY CHANGES
COVERAGE AFFECTED
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION INSURANCE
MINIMUM EARNED PREMIUM — 100%
In consideration of the payment of premium by the Named Insured, we agree, subject to all the
terms, exclusions and conditions of the policy, that the COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
INSURANCE policy has a 100 percent (100%) earned premium at inception.
ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE POLICY SHALL APPLY AND REMAIN UNCHANGED.
© 2017 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company. All rights reserved.
Includes copyrighted material of the Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.
BSUM 1200 (11-11) Page 1 of 1

ENDORSEMENT
This endorsement forms a part of the policy to which it is attached. Please read it carefully.
COVERED LOCATION ENDORSEMENT
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION INSURANCE
In consideration of the premium charged, and notwithstanding anything contained in this Policy to the contrary, it is hereby
understood and agreed that the following is a Covered Location:
COVERED LOCATION
The Compensatory Mitigation Bank Project scheduled on the Declarations page as the Hair Sheep Stream
Mitigation Bank, in Surry County, NC, as better described in the Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Plan, Section I
Introduction, and as better shown in Figure 1 of the Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Plan.
ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE POLICY SHALL APPLY AND REMAIN UNCHANGED.
CMI 6601 12 16 Page 1 of 1

ENDORSEMENT
This endorsement forms a part of the policy to which it is attached. Please read it carefully.
INDEMNIFICATION ENDORSEMENT
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION INSURANCE
In consideration of the premium charged, and notwithstanding anything contained in this Policy to the contrary, it
is hereby understood and agreed that SECTION VI — CONDITIONS is modified by the addition of the following:
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
KCI Technologies, Inc. and its successors and assigns, the undersigned Indemnitor, hereby agrees to
indemnify, release and hold the Company, Nautilus Insurance Company, harmless for any payments the
Company makes under Nautilus Policy Number To be Assigned, the policy, and for the costs, fees, and
expenses the Company incurs related to the administration of, or disputes over, any such payments. The
indemnified amounts shall include:
1. Financial Assurances paid by the Company; and/or
2. Deductible amounts advanced by the Company; and/or
3. The costs of obligations that the Company may incur by reason of having issued the Policy; and/or
4. Costs, fees and expenses (including fees of attorneys, experts, or consultants) resulting from the
investigation, defense, or prosecution of any lawsuit, legal action, complaint, or other legal proceeding,
arising out of payments demanded or made under the policy, or out of any dispute between Insured(s) and
the Authorizing Agency regarding any payment demanded or made, or out of any legal action by the
Company to secure or attempt to secure any Claim or policy release resulting therefrom.
5. Claims handling expenses, which in the event of a Claim shall be calculated as 12% of the sum of
payments for Financial Assurances made pursuant to the policy.
6. Any legal fees to effectuate this indemnification agreement.
When the Indemnitor's obligation to pay for indemnified amounts pursuant to the policy become due, the
Company shall make a demand in the form of a written invoice for the indemnification amount to the Indemnitor's
address as stated below. The Indemnitor agrees to pay the full amount of the invoice within thirty (30) days of its
issuance. If the Company has not received full payment from the Indemnitor within thirty (30) days of issuance of
the Company's written invoice, interest shall accrue at the annual rate equal to the current prevailing prime
interest rate as published in the Wall Street Journal plus 200 basis points until full payment is received by the
Company. If partial payment is received by the Company the aforementioned interest rate shall apply to that
portion which remains outstanding until the full payment is received by the Company.
This endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations, nor shall the
indemnification reinstate any limit of insurance.
The undersigned swears or affirms that he/she has the authority to execute this agreement on behalf of the
Indemnitor:
Signature of Authorized Representative:
CMI 6602 01 18
© 2016 by Berkley Environmental, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 2

Printed Name and Title:
KCI Technologies, Inc.
936 Ridgebrook Road
Company Name and Address (Indemnitor): Sparks, MD 21152
Notary Public:
ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE POLICY SHALL APPLY AND REMAIN UNCHANGED.
CMI 6602 01 18
© 2016 by Berkley Environmental, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
Page 2 of 2

ENDORSEMENT
This endorsement forms a part of the policy to which it is attached. Please read it carefully.
WILMINGTON DISTRICT AMENDATORY ENDORSEMENT
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION INSURANCE POLICY
In consideration of the premium charged, and notwithstanding anything contained in this policy to the contrary, it is hereby
understood and agreed that the following changes apply:
Section II — DEFINITIONS, Item 6. is hereby deleted and replaced by the following:
6. Default means a written and final determination made by the Authorizing Agency that the Named Insured
has failed to successfully complete construction activities and/or Performance Standards, as applicable, in
accordance with the Mitigation Plan, at a Compensatory Mitigation Project site scheduled in the
Declarations to this policy, but only if such determination is made following:
(1) a period of time of more than one year (or shorter period as determined by the Authorizing Agency)
after the Authorizing Agency has issued a Deficiency Notice during the policy period or effective
coverage period for that Mitigation Plan or Compensatory Mitigation Project site, and
(2) the Named Insured's best efforts to mitigate any deficiencies noticed by the Authorizing Agency in
any prior Deficiency Notice for that Mitigation Plan or Compensatory Mitigation Project site and to
prevent the Default;
Default shall not include any determination by the Authorizing Agency that the Named Insured has failed to
comply with, or breached, any other term or condition of the Mitigation Banking Instrument or other document
thereunder, other than the construction activities and/or Performance Standards, as applicable in a Mitigation
Plan for a Compensatory Mitigation Project site scheduled in the Declarations to this policy, or any resultant
suspension or termination of the Mitigation Banking Instrument as a result of such non-compliance or breach.
Default shall also not include any delay or failure of the Insured if and to the extent that such delay or failure
is primarily caused by any act, event, or conditions beyond the Insured's reasonable control and significantly
adversely affects its ability to perform its obligations hereunder including: (1) acts of God, lightning,
earthquake, fire, landslide, or interference by third parties; (ii) condemnation or other taking by any
governmental body; (iii) change in applicable law, regulation, rule, ordinance or permit condition, or the
interpretation or enforcement thereof; (iv) any order, judgment, action or determination of any federal, state or
local court, administrative agency or government body; or (v) the suspension or interruption of any permit,
license, consent, authorization or approval. If the performance of the Insured is affected by any such event,
the Insured shall give written notice thereof to the district engineer and interagency review committee as
soon as is reasonably practicable. If such event occurs before the issuance of a close out letter, the Insured
shall take remedial action to the extent necessary and appropriate as determined by the district engineer, in
consultation with the interagency review committee, to restore the property to its condition prior to such event
and as defined in each approved Mitigation Plan. Such remedial action shall be taken by the Sponsor only to
the extent necessary and appropriate, as determined by the interagency review committee.
Section II — DEFINITIONS, Item 7. is hereby deleted and replaced by the following:
7. Deficiency Notice means a written notice issued by the Authorizing Agency to the Named Insured:
(1) advising that it is not progressing towards, or on track to, successfully complete construction in
accordance with the Mitigation Plan for a Compensatory Mitigation Project site; and
© 2017 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 3

(2) requesting that the Named Insured implement measures to correct the deficiencies, including but not
limited to implementation of an Adaptive Management Plan, or modifications to the existing
Mitigation Plan, and/or
(3) modifying, decreasing or suspending credit sales of the Mitigation Bank until the Named Insured
successfully completes measures to correct deficiencies in the implementation of a Mitigation Plan for
a Compensatory Mitigation Project site.
III. Section III — EXCLUSIONS, Item 1. is hereby deleted.
IV. Section V — REPORTING, ADJUSTMENT & SETTLEMENT, Item 3. CLAIM ADJUSTMENT and
SETTLEMENT is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
3. CLAIM ADJUSTMENT and SETTLEMENT
The Insured(s) agree that that the Company shall have the right to adjust, pay or settle any Claim, to which
this insurance applies, at its sole discretion, without the Insured(s) consent, subject to the available and
remaining Limits of Insurance for the applicable Effective Coverage Period, and that such adjustment,
payment, or settlement may include, but not be limited to, the following actions:
1) Payment of Financial Assurances to a designee or standby trust, approved by the Authorizing
Agency, for distribution by such designee or trustee to complete the Compensatory Mitigation in
accordance with the Insured's legal responsibility under the Mitigation Banking Instrument and/or
33 CFR 332; or
2) Payment of Financial Assurances to a replacement contractor, approved by the Authorizing Agency
to either perform replacement Compensatory Mitigation at another site or to complete the
Compensatory Mitigation at the Compensatory Mitigation Project site from which the Default has
been determined.
The Company may make such inquiries and investigations of the Claim as it deems expedient, including
inquiries to the Named Insured or the Authorizing Agency regarding the Claim, and payment of Financial
Assurances.
The Insured(s) agree that no Claim or Financial Assurances will be paid without the prior written consent
and approval of the Authorizing Agency, and that the Company shall incur no liability to the Insured(s)
resulting from such inquiries and/or resulting from the non-payment of any Claim or Financial Assurances for
which the Authorizing Agency has not consented and/or approved. The Insured(s) shall not admit liability
or settle any Claim without the Company's consent. The Insured(s) shall not be released from any of their
duties or obligations to the Company under this policy by virtue of any payment or adjustment of a Claim by
the Company, including the Insured(s) duties to indemnify the Company.
V. Section VI — CONDITIONS, Item 5. CHANGES is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
5.CHANGES
Notice to any agent or knowledge possessed by any agent or by any other person shall not effect a waiver or
change in any part of this Policy or estop the Company from asserting any right under the terms of this Policy;
nor shall the terms of this Policy be waived or changed, except by endorsement issued by the Company to form
a part of this Policy with the prior approval of the Authorizing Agency.
© 2017 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
Page 2 of 3

VI. Section VI — CONDITIONS, Item 6. CHOICE OF LAW is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
CHOICE OF LAW
The Named Insured and the Company agree that all matters or disputes arising hereunder, including any
questions relating to the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of this policy, the meaning,
interpretation or operation of any term, condition, definition or provision, or the fulfillment of any party of any
obligation with respect to the policy, shall be determined in accordance with the law and practices of the State
of New York.
However, this does not apply to the Army Corp of Engineers.
ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE POLICY SHALL APPLY AND REMAIN UNCHANGED.
© 2017 by Berkley Specialty Underwriting Managers LLC, an affiliate of Nautilus Insurance Company and Great Divide Insurance Company.
All rights reserved.
Page 3 of 3

12.6 DWR Stream Identification Forms and USACE Wetland Data Sheets
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

T1 top
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/6/2018
Project/Site: Hair Sheep Creek
Latitude: 36.4892
Evaluator: J. Sullivan
County: Surly
Longitude: _80.7052
Total Points:
circle one)
Stream Detertermittnty
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
21.25
Ephemeral erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if> 19 or perennial if 2: 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 6 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
010
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
O
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
120
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
QO
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 02
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1 2
03
14. Leaf litter
1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 .5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Qes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 4.75 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
01
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
QO
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
QO
0.5
1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACV(= 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

T1 downstream
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/6/2018
Project/Site: Hair Sheep Creek
Latitude: 36.4782
Evaluator: J. Sullivan
County: Surry
Longitude: -80.7037
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circleone)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 31.5
if >19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 16.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
D
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
(D
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
010
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
02
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
(
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
12Q
1 1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydroloqy (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 CO 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.JD 1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 0.5 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0)Yes = 3
1
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5 1
1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
they = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Nothing found in net
Sketch:

T1-1
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/6/2018
Project/Site Hair Sheep Creek
Latitude: 36.4791
Evaluator: J. Sullivan
County: Surry
Longitude: _80.7050
Total Points:
Stream Deter ' circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
if > 19 or perennial if 2: 30* 22.5
Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 8 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1)
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
O
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
No = 0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 9.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biolow (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
C?p
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5 1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Nothing found in net
Sketch:

T2-1 Top
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/16/18
Project/Site: Hair Sheep Creek
Latitude: 36.4775
Evaluator: Alex French
County: Surry
Longitude: -80.7077
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 24.5
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 11 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 "Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
Yes = 3
0.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0
1
2
3
22. Fish 0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians 0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae 0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Flowing but recent heavy rain. Previous visits had water but
less flow. Many
leaves in channel
Sketch:

T2-1 Middle
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/6/2018
Project/site: Hair Sheep Creek
Latitude: 36.4774
Evaluator: J. Sullivan
County: Surry
Longitude: -80.7076
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 21
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if 2: 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 8.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 "Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: No Biology
Sketch:

T2-1
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/6/2018
Project/Site: Hair Sheep Creek
Latitude: 36.4766
Evaluator:J. Sullivan
County: Surry
Longitude: -80.7077
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circ
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 31
if > 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 14.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1O2
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
C 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
S.14.
Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: No Biology
Sketch:

T2-2
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/6/2018
Project/Site: Hair Sheep Creek
Latitude: 36.4770
Evaluator:J. Sullivan
County: Surry
Longitude: -80.7074
Total Points:
Stream Deter n (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 27.5
Ephemera Intermitter Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if > 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2)
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2)
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0O
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
CE)
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
C 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
(pp
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: No Biology
Sketch:

I%
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/6/2018
Project/Site: Hair Sheep Creek
Latitude: 36.4732
Evaluator: J. Sullivan
County: Surry
Longitude: _80.7067
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circ
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 36
if > 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
I e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
03
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
12Q
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
120
1 1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
= OD
Yes = 3
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
120
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.510
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Qes = 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
QO
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
QD
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5 1
1 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
I
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
they = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Many Gambusia 3 damselflies
Sketch:

WB wet
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Hair Sheep Creek City/County: Surry Sampling Date: 6/6/18
Applicant/Owner: KCI State: NC Sampling Point: WB wet
Investigator(s): J. Sullivan Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P-136 Lat: 36.4754 Long: -80.7059 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview Sandy Clay loam NWI classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. none
3.
4.
WA
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. Rosa multiflora 5 X FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Juncus effusus 50 X FACW
2. Carex sp. 30 X FACW
3. Polygonum saggittatum 15 OBL
4. Cicula maculata 5 OBL
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
100 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Lonicera japonica 5 X FAC
2.
3.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
Sampling Point: WB wet
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
4
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
75%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiaht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WB wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-2
10YR 4/2
100
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
L
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
2-6
10YR 5/2
90
7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL
SCL
gravel
6-12
10YR 5/2
80
7.5YR 4/6 20 C PL—
SCL
gravel
12-18+
10YR 4/1
70
SCL
mica
10YR 5/4
30
mica
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WB up
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Hair Sheep Creek City/County: Surry Sampling Date: 616/18
Applicant/Owner: KCI State: NC Sampling Point: WB up
Investigator(s): J. Sullivan Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P-136 Lat: 36.4757 Long: -80.7058 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview sandy Clay loam NWI classification: -
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Cattle Pasture
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches): -
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. none
3.
4.
WA
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. none
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Schedonorous arindinaceus 95 X
2. Trifolium sp. 5
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Sampling Point: WB up
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
0
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
1
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
0%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1
FACU I — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
100 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. none
2.
3.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
Tree –Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiaht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WB up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/3 100 SL
2-5 10YR 5/3 100 SL
5-18+ 7.5YR 5/8 100 SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

12.7 Approved Jurisdictional Determination
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: SAW -2018-00712 County: Surry U.S.G.S. Quad: Dobson
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner:
Joe Sullivan, KCI Technologies Inc.
Address:
4505 Falls of Neuse Rd. Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Telephone Number:
919-278-2533
Size (acres):
11.4 acres Nearest Town: Mt Airy
Nearest Waterway:
Cooks Creek Coordinates: 36.4782,-80.703
River Basin/ HUC:
Upper Yadkin
Location description: The project is located at Haystack Road north and south of US 74 near Mt Airy, NC
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat
all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
There are wetlands on the above described property, that maybe subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely
an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area,
which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have
the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wethind
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the
Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33
USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation
that can be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon
completion. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA
jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.

_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years fiom the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification,
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(LAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding, this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact William Elliott at
828-271-7980, ext. 4225 or [e-mail].
C. Basis for Determination:
See attached preliminary jurisdictional determination form.
The site contains wetlands as determined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the
Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountain and Piedmont
Region (version 2.0). These wetlands are adjacent to stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators
of ordinary high water marks. The stream channel on the property "is known as" Cooks Creek and there are
unnamed tributaries (UT) to" Cooks Creek.
D. Remarks:
The potential waters of the U.S., at this site, were verified on-site by the Corps on July 25, 2018 and are as
approximately depicted on the attached Potential Wetland/Waters Map (figure 3).
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineatiou/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate
participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the
Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B, above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to
this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you
will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal
this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OMI 5
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria
for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the
NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by N/A (Preliminary -JD).

**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Off e if y u do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
William Elliott
Issue Date of JD: Nov 20, 2018 Expiration Date: N/A Preliminary JD
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure
we continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0.
Copy furnished:
Robert and Treva Smith Jr., 2240 Maple Grove Church Road, Lowgap, NC 27024

SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.ariny.inil/Missions/Civilworks/Re ug latoryProgramandPennits.as or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terns and. conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section E of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
Ci PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Cops of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section D of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD.
The Preliminary JD is not appealable.. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Cops
district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Joe Sullivan, KCI Technologies Inc. File Number: SAW -SAW -2018-00712 I Date: Nov 20, 2018
Attached is: See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.ariny.inil/Missions/Civilworks/Re ug latoryProgramandPennits.as or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terns and. conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section E of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
Ci PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Cops of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section D of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD.
The Preliminary JD is not appealable.. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Cops
district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION 11- REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record
of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the
administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may
provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: William Elliott
CESAD-PDO
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
60 Forsyth Street, Room IOM15
828-271-7980, ext. 4232
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn.: William Elliott, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JD: Nov 20, 2018
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Joe Sullivan, KCI Technologies Inc.
4505 Falls of Neuse Rd. Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
CESAW-RG-A, SAW -2018-00712,
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The project is located at Haystack Road north and south of US 74 near Mt Airy, NC
State: NC County/parish/borough: Surry City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): 36.4782,-80.7039
Universal Transverse Mercator: N/A
Name ofnearest waterbody: Cooks Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SI'Z`E EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: Nov 20, 2018
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
Use the table below to document aquatic resources and/or aquatic resources at different sites
TABLE OFAQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEWAREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION
Site
Centered Coordinates
Estimated Amount
Type of Aquatic
Geographic
Number
(decimal degrees)
of Aquatic Resource
Resources
Authority to Which
in Review Area
Aquatic Resource
Latitude Longitude
(linear feet or acre)
"May Be" Subject
See attached
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
table
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
El Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
El Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
E] Wetland
❑ Section 404
❑ Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
El Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404
❑ Wetland
❑ Section 404
Non -wetland Waters
❑ Section 10/404

The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requester of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCH
or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant
has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the
permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make
an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to
request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation
being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual
permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with
all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps
has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit
authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or
undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be heated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any
administrative orjudicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in
any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will
be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.P.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the
review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD
finds that there '4nay be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked Items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester:
Map:Vicinity Map
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: _
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
0 U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Dobson 1:24K
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Q Photographs: FEJ Aerial (Name & Date): 2014 Statewide Aerial Photographs
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
determinations.
Signature and date of �0 gn re and date of
Regulatory staff member �a6%� person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Hair Sheep Creek Restoration Site Stream and Wetland Tables
Table 1
Stream Name
Stream Status
Bankfull
Height
(Feet)
Bankfull
Width
(Feet)
Length
(Feet)
DWQ
Score
Lat
Long
Cook's Creek
Perennial
4
8
680
-
36.4789
-80.7034
T1
Intermittent
0.5
3
357
21.25
36.4792
-80.7052
T1
Perennial
2
4
477
31.5
36.4782
-80.7037
T1-1
Intermittent
0.5
3
172
22.5
36.4791
-80.7050
T2
Perennial
3
6
1,966
36
36.4762
-80.7067
T2-1
Intermittent
2
3
254
-
36.4774
-80.7076
T2-1
Perennial
3
4
84
31
36.4766
-80.7077
T2-2
Perennial
4
5
284 1
27.5
36.4770
-80.7074
Table 2.
July 2018
Wetland ID
NCWAM
Class
Hydrologic Cowardin
Isolated
Yes/No
Size
(Acres)
USACE Forms
WET UP
Lat
Long
WA
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PEM*
No
0.34
WB
WB
36.4767
-80.7071
WB
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PEM*
No
0.16
X
X
36.4754
-80.7059
WC
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PEM*
No
0.18
WB
WB
36.4752
-80.7057
WD
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PEM*
No
0.03
WB
WB
36.4791
-80.7052
PEM = Palustrine Emergent
" = Vegetatiion is disturbed by cattle grazing
X = Data form completed
Page 1 of 1

7,�:*,� ;
i
i
i
rs •
i:=
i pyx
w tc,
tf `.
-
t'A'Lv
{ F
1X
a 4 +
A
yy�
i
Project Easement r . a �. �,�-•: � �i
yr
— Off -Site Streams
Potential WOTUS t
- - - Intermittent Streams
— Perennial Streams
Wetlands NC jJ_neMap INCdO'enterfon Geographic �n_fortru"aation and al.
BoaCdl
0 125 250 FIGURE 3. POTENTIAL WOTUS AN
HAIR SHEEP CREEK RESTORATION SITE I\ Source: NC One Map
Feet SURRY COUNTY, NC N Odhoimagery• 2014.

12.8 Invasive Species
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Existing Invasive Populations and Proposed Treatment
In the revegetated portions of the site, invasive species are present in varying densities. The riparian zones
of T1, T1-1, and Cooks Creek have scattered individuals of Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora). T2
has all of the above species along with tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima).
During construction, mechanical removal (including grubbing) will be the preferred treatment method
since equipment will be mobilized on-site. KCI equipment operators and contractors are experienced in
identifying common invasive species and understand the methodology for mechanical removal of these
as plants as they implement the designed stream improvements. The staff is also experienced in
minimizing damage to desirable canopy trees and will avoid critical root zones when possible to minimize
damage to trees that will remain.
In addition, topical chemical treatment using a tank mix of active ingredients triclopyr and glyphosate will
be used as needed on larger -stemmed woody species throughout targeted areas identified above using
backpack sprayers. Stumps will also be treated using a 40% active ingredient glyphosate solution. Invasive
shrubs and vines such as Japanese honeysuckle and multiflora rose will be treated topically with
glyphosate.
Monitoring Phase
Following construction, the site will be monitored for the presence of invasive species during both the
visual assessments and vegetation plot monitoring events and will follow the guidance in the Wilmington
District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update (NCIRT 2016) regarding invasive species. A
list of non-native invasive species for North Carolina is found in the NC SAM User Manual Appendix I.
Per the NCIRT 2016 guidance, invasive species management should occur when the functional integrity of
the vegetative community is impacted. One or more invasive species may present a threat to the site, but
the desirable species may have the ability to survive or outcompete despite the competition. Once an
invasive species is identified as impairing the site, physical and/or chemical removal and treatment should
occur. Any control measures will be noted in the annual monitoring reports. It is anticipated that
additional post -construction treatments will be required to control the growth and re -propagation of the
invasive populations at the HSSMB. Chemical treatment is expected to be the standard process for post -
construction services.
North Carolina Interagency Review Team. 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory
Mitigation Update. Last accessed at: http://saw-reg.usace.army.miI/PN/2016/Wilmington-District-
Mitigation-Update.pdf
N.C. Stream Functional Assessment Team. 2016. N.C. Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) User Manual.
(https://ribits.usace.army.miI/ribits apex/f?p=107:150:16800695257725::NO::P150 DOCUMEN
T ID:36298 )
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

12.9 NEPA Documentation
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

047 OF Tye' FISH &� E
LDLIF
United States Department of the Interior
a
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
a9 Asheville Field Office
9R�$ rn1`
CH 3,
160 Zillicoa Street Suite #B
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
November 19, 2018
Mr. Timothy J. Morris
KCI Technologies
4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Ste. 400
Raleigh, NC 23113
Dear Mr. Morris:
Subject: Hair Sheep Creek Restoration Site, Haystack Road, Mount Airy, Surry County, North
Carolina (KCI Job #161706170)
We received your letter of October 25, 2018 (received via email on October 30, 2018),
requesting our comments on the subject project. The following comments are provided in
accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.§4321 et
seq.) and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543)
(Act).
According to our records and a review of the information you provided, no federally listed
species or their habitats occur in the project area. Therefore, we believe the requirements under
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act must be reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of
this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously
considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this
review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the
identified action.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments and request that you continue to keep
us informed as to the progress of this proposed project. If we can be of assistance or if you have
any questions, please contact Mr. Allen Ratzlaff of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 229. In any
future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-19-044.
E -Copy:
Olivia Munzer, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, olivia.munzer(a),ncwildlife.oM

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
October 8, 2018
Steve Kichefski
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: KCI Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank, Haystack Road, Mount Airy, SAW 2018-00712,
Surry County, ER 18-2277
Dear Mr. Kechefski:
We have received a public notice concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

12.10 Agency Correspondence
Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

Draft Mitigation Plan —12/27/2018 Hair Sheep Stream Mitigation Bank

KCI
Memoranda
ENGINEERS ♦ SURVEYORS ♦ SCIENTISTS ♦ CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
LANDMARK CENTER II, SUITE 220 ♦ 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ♦ RALEIGH, NC 27609 ♦ 919-783-9214 ♦ (FAX) 919-783-9266
TO: Mr. Steve Kichefski, ACOE
Ms. Kimberly Browning, ACOE
FROM: Tim Morris, KCI
DATE: May 30,2018
SUBJECT: KCI Yadkin Umbrella Bank Prospectus — Hair Sheep Site Visit
IRT On -Site Prospectus Review Meeting
KCI Project Number: 161706170
Attendees:
Kimberly Browning, ACOE
Steve Kichefski, ACOE
Mac Haupt, DWR
Andrea Leslie, NC WRC
Tim Morris, KCI
Adam Spiller, KCI
An IRT field review was conducted for the above referenced project on May 29, 2018 starting at
approximately 10:30 am. Weather was overcast with brief periods of rain. Approximately 1.6"
of rainfall had fallen during the previous week leading up to the site visit. All project streams
(Cooks Creek and Tributaries 1, 1-1, 2 and 2-1) were flowing at the time of the site visit. Tim
Morris and Adam Spiller from KCI presented the project to the attendees. The following issues
and concerns were documented at the meeting and will be addressed in the Final Prospectus and
future development of the site.
The IRT questioned the status of the stream/wetland calls at the top of T2-1 and T1,
indicating that the Corps reviewer (likely William Elliot) may call these wetlands rather
than streams which could impact crediting. Although partially vegetated, the areas
maintain perennial flow and could probably be considered headwater streams or wetlands.
The group agreed that the crediting would hinge on the JD calls and the final mitigation
plan would reflect the final decision in these areas.
Response: KCl indicated that if these areas were not considered streams, KCI would
likely attempt to offset the stream credit losses with wetland rehabilitation or re-

Memorandum
Page 2of3
May 30, 2018
establishment credits along T2 where existing and restorable wetland functions will be
replaced as a result of the project. KCl intends to do a formal delineation the week of 6-
4-18. The Final Prospectus will reflect this delineation as well as the JD if it occurs
prior to the completion of the Final Prospectus. If KCI restructures the prospectus to
request wetland credits for the project, pressure transducer gauges will be installed
ASAP to document the baseline hydrology of the existing and restorable wetlands. These
gauges will also be used to document whether the restored stream will have any impact
on existing emergent and scrub -shrub wetland features.
2. A general comment was made that the IRT did not like the fact that the project was
bisected by I-74 and that the project was generally small when compared to most
mitigation banks. The IRT also expressed concern that cattle had access upstream of the
T2.
Response: KCI will attempt to re-initiate contact with the upstream landowner to see if
the headwaters of T2 can be protected with a conservation easement. Since these areas
were not fully walked during the site visit, it is possible that an additional site visit would
be required to determine the credit status of these tributaries. The IRT indicated that
since these areas were small that it may be possible to make a determination based on
video or photo documentation.
3. The IRT expressed concern regarding the heavy infestation of invasive species
(honeysuckle, tree of heaven, multiflora rose, etc.) along Tributary 2.
Response: KCI will include an invasive species management plan in the mitigation plan
that identifies the control strategies for each invasive species identified during
assessment.
4. The IRT indicated that the expanded buffers that are proposed for the project should be
run through the new buffer guidance on a reach by reach basis to determine if extra
crediting is feasible.
5. The IRT mentioned that the proposed RSC structure proposed at the top of Tl could take
on a variety of different forms, depending on the goals of the feature. The IRT stressed
that the feature should not require future maintenance if it was to be sited within the
Conservation Easement.
Response: KCl will stabilize the eroded ephemeral drainage feature and also provide
storage and retention capabilities for the downstream resource. While the feature may
be similar in character to an RSC, it may be modified to utilize on-site materials if

Memorandum
Page 3of3
May 30, 2018
drainage characteristics are determined to be appropriate.
6. DWR questioned the need for the crossing on T-1.
Response: KCl called the landowner and as a result of the conversation we will
eliminate the crossing on T-1. We will need to improve a farm road above the headwater
seep (outside the easement) in order to allow access to his property along I-74.

KCI Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Mitigation Banking Instrument
January 21, 2019
Geographic Service Area
Yadkin River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03040101
Prepared for:
USACE, Wilmington District
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Prepared by:
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC,
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
4505 Falls of Neuse Rd, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]

Version December 2016
AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH THE KCI YADKIN 01 UMBRELLA MITIGATION
BANK IN THE YADKIN RIVER BASIN WITHIN THE STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA
USACE approval of this Instrument constitutes the regulatory approval required for the KCI
YADKIN 01 UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK to be used to provide compensatory mitigation
for Department of the Army permits pursuant to 33 C.P.R. 332.8(a)(1). This Instrument is not a
contract between the Sponsor or Property Owner and USACE or any other agency of the federal
government. Any dispute arising under this Instrument will not give rise to any claim by the
Sponsor or Property Owner for monetary damages. This provision is controlling notwithstanding
any other provision or statement in the Instrument to the contrary.
This Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI) is made and entered into on the
day of , 20 by KCI Technologies, Inc., hereinafter Sponsor, and the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (Corps), and each of the following agencies, upon its execution of this UMBI; the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC), the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the North Carolina Division of
Water Resources (NCDWR). The Corps, together with the State and Federal agencies that execute
this UMBI, are hereinafter collectively referred to as the Interagency Review Team (IRT).
WHEREAS the purpose of this agreement is to establish an umbrella mitigation bank (Bank)
providing compensatory mitigation for unavoidable wetland and/or stream impacts separately
authorized by Section 404 Clean Water Act permits and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act permits in appropriate circumstances;
WHEREAS the agencies comprising the IRT agree that the Bank site is a suitable mitigation
bank site, and that implementation of the Mitigation Plan is likely to result in net gains in wetland
and stream functions at the Bank site, and have therefore approved the Mitigation Plan;
THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed among the parties to this agreement that the following
provisions are adopted and will be implemented upon signature of this UMBI.
Section I: General Provisions
A. The Sponsor is responsible for assuring the success of the restoration and enhancement
activities at the Bank site, and for the overall operation and management of the Bank. The Sponsor
assumes the legal responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation once a permittee
secures credits from the Sponsor and the District Engineer (DE) receives documentation that
confirms the Sponsor has accepted responsibility for providing the required compensatory
mitigation.
B. The goals of the Umbrella Bank site is to restore, enhance, create and preserve wetland and
stream systems and their functions to compensate in appropriate circumstances for unavoidable
stream impacts authorized by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act permits and or Section 10 of the
1

Version December 2016
Rivers and Harbors Act permits in circumstances deemed appropriate by the Corps after
consultation, through the permit review process, with members of the IRT.
C. Use of credits from the Bank to offset wetland and/or stream impacts authorized by Clean
Water Act permits must be in compliance with the Clean Water Act and implementing regulations,
including but not limited to the 404(b)(1) Guidelines, the National Environmental Policy Act, and
all other applicable Federal and State legislation, rules and regulations. This agreement has been
drafted in accordance with the regulations for Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic
Resources effective June 9, 2008 (33 CFR Parts 325 and 332) (Mitigation Rule).
D. The IRT shall be chaired by the DE of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District (District). The IRT shall review documentation for the establishment of mitigation bank
sites. The IRT will also advise the DE in assessing monitoring reports, recommending remedial
measures, approving credit releases, and approving modifications to this instrument. The IRT's
role and responsibilities are more fully set forth in Sections 332.8 of the Mitigation Rule. The IRT
will work to reach consensus on its actions.
E. The DE, after consultation with the appropriate Federal and State review agencies through
the permit review process, shall make final decisions concerning the amount and type of
compensatory mitigation to be required for unavoidable, permitted wetland and/or stream impacts,
and whether or not the use of credits from the Bank is appropriate to offset those impacts. In the
case of permit applications and compensatory mitigation required solely under the Section 401
Water Quality Certification rules of North Carolina, the NCDWR will determine the amount of
credits that can be withdrawn from the Bank. Any credits used to offset impacts solely authorized
by Section 401 cannot be used for other impacts authorized under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act.
F. The parties to this agreement understand that a watershed approach to establish
compensatory mitigation must be used to the extent appropriate and practicable. Where
practicable, in-kind compensatory mitigation is preferred.
Section II: Geographic Service Area
The Geographic Service Area (GSA) is the designated area within which the Umbrella Bank is
authorized to provide compensatory mitigation required by DA permits. The GSA for this Bank
shall include the Yadkin River Basin Hydrologic Unit 03040101 in North Carolina. Credits are
to be used in the same HUC in which they were generated, and credits within each HUC should
be tracked on separate ledgers.
Section III: Mitigation Plan
Any Mitigation Plan submitted pursuant to this agreement must contain the information
listed in 332.4(c) (2) through (14) of the Compensatory Mitigation Rule.

Version December 2016
A. The Sponsor will perform work described in the/each site-specific approved Mitigation
Plan(s).
B. The Sponsor shall monitor the Bank Site(s) as described in the approved Mitigation Plan(s),
until such time as the IRT determines that the performance standards described in the Mitigation
Plan(s) have been met.
C. Mitigation Plans submitted for inclusion in this bank must meet the requirements of any
District guidance that is current at the time the new site is submitted to the District, including any
updates made to monitoring requirements, credit releases, long term management, or any other
provisions that are required and/or specifically addressed in the Mitigation Plan. The addition of
any site to this instrument shall be considered as a modification to this instrument, and processed
in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Mitigation Rule.
D. The members of the IRT will be allowed reasonable access to the Property for the purposes
of inspection of the Property and compliance monitoring of the Mitigation Plan.
Section IV: Reporting
A. The Sponsor shall submit to the DE, for distribution to each member of the IRT, an annual
report describing the current condition of the Bank Site(s) and the condition of the Bank Site(s) in
relation to the performance standards in the Mitigation Plan(s). The Sponsor shall provide to the
DE any monitoring reports described in the Mitigation Plan(s).
B. As part of each annual monitoring report, the Sponsor shall also provide ledger reports
documenting credit transactions as described in Section VIII of this LIMBI.
C. Each time an approved credit transaction occurs, the Sponsor shall provide notification to
the DE within 30 days of the transaction. This notification shall consist of a summary of the
transaction and a full ledger report reflecting the changes from the transaction. Additionally,
signed copies of the Compensatory Mitigation Transfer of Responsibility Form shall be submitted
to the Corps Project Manager for the permit and the Corps Bank Manager for the bank site.
Section V: Remedial Action
A. The DE shall review the monitoring reports, as required in the Mitigation Plan(s), and may,
at any time, after consultation with the Sponsor and the IRT, direct the Sponsor to take remedial
action at the Bank site(s). Remedial action(s) required by the DE shall be designed to achieve the
performance standards as specified in the Mitigation Plan(s). All remedial actions required under
this section shall include a work schedule and monitoring criteria that will take into account
physical and climactic conditions.
B. The Sponsor shall implement any remedial measures required pursuant to the above.

Version December 2016
C. In the event the Sponsor determines that remedial action may be necessary to achieve the
required performance standards, it shall provide notice of such proposed remedial action to all
members of the IRT. No remedial actions shall be taken without the concurrence of the DE, in
consultation with the IRT.
Section VI: Use of Mitigation Credits
A. Description of credit classifications and provisions pertaining to the use of those credits
shall be provided in the Mitigation Plan(s) to be included in this bank. Credit classifications (e.g.,
cold water stream, cool water stream, warm water stream, coastal wetlands, non -riparian wetlands,
riparian non-riverine wetlands, and riparian riverine wetlands) will be in accordance with current
District guidance at the time the Mitigation Plan is submitted to the District. In general, these
classifications will be used to determine if a particular credit qualifies as "In -Kind" mitigation.
Exceptions to the use of "In -Kind" mitigation may be allowed at the discretion of the permitting
agencies on a case-by-case basis.
B. Wetland and stream compensation ratios are determined by the DE on a case-by-case basis
based on considerations of functions of the wetlands and/or streams impacted, the severity of the
wetland and/or stream impacts, the relative age of the mitigation site, whether the compensatory
mitigation is in-kind, and the physical proximity of the wetland and/or stream impacts to the Bank
Site.
C. Notwithstanding the above, all decisions concerning the appropriateness of using credits
from the Bank to offset impacts to waters and wetlands, as well as all decisions concerning the
amount and type of such credits to be used to offset wetland and stream impacts authorized by
Department of the Army permits, shall be made by the DE, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act and implementing regulations and guidance. These decisions may include notice to and
consultation with the members of the IRT through the permit review process if the DE determines
this to be appropriate given the scope and nature of the impact.
Section VII: Credit Release Schedule
A. All credit releases must be approved in writing by the DE, following consultation with the
IRT, based on a determination that required performance standards have been achieved.
B. A credit release schedule shall be provided in the/each site-specific Mitigation Plan(s) that
are included in this bank. The release schedule will list all of the proposed credit releases and any
performance standards associated with those releases.
C. In general, the initial allocation of credits from any site included as part of this bank shall
be available for sale only after the completion of all of the following:
1. Execution of this UMBI by the Sponsor, the DE, and other agencies eligible for
membership in the IRT who choose to execute this agreement, to include the approval of
any modifications to this agreement when new sites are added to it;
2. Approval of a final Mitigation Plan;
3. Confirmation that the mitigation bank site has been secured;
4

Version December 2016
4. Delivery of executed financial assurances as specified in the site-specific Mitigation
Plan;
5. Delivery of a copy of the recorded long-term protection mechanism as described in as
specified in the site-specific Mitigation Plan, as well as a title opinion covering the property
acceptable to the DE; and
6. Issuance of any DA permits necessary for construction of the mitigation site (if
necessary).
The Sponsor must initiate implementation of the approved Mitigation Plan(s) no later than the first
full growing season after the date of the first credit transaction (i.e., construction of the initial
physical and biological improvements proposed in the approved Mitigation Plan(s) must be started
by the end of the first full growing season following the initial sale of any credits from the Bank.
This provision does not apply to preservation -only sites that do not include any physical or
biological improvements. Subject to the Sponsor's continued satisfactory completion of all
required performance standards and monitoring, additional restoration mitigation credits will be
available for sale by the Sponsor as specified in the final Mitigation Plan.
Section VIII: Accounting Procedures
A. The Sponsor shall develop accounting procedures acceptable to the DE for maintaining
accurate records of debits made from the Bank. Such procedures shall include the generation of a
ledger by the Sponsor showing credits used at the time they are debited from the Bank. All ledger
reports shall identify credits debited and remaining by type of credit and shall include for each
reported debit the Corps ORM ID number for the permit for which the credits were utilized and
the permitted impacts for each resource type.
B. When credits from the bank are sought by a permit applicant, the Sponsor shall prepare a
reservation letter for the applicant to include with the Corps permit application, that documents
the number and type of credits available to be debited from the bank, and the amount of time (if
any) that those credits will be held for that applicant (with an expiration date for the letter of
availability).
C. Each time an approved credit transaction occurs, the Sponsor shall notify the DE within 30
days of the transaction with a summary of the transaction and a full ledger report showing the
changes made. Signed copies of the Transfer of Mitigation Responsibility form shall also be
submitted to the Corps permit Project Manager and the Corps Bank Manager for that bank.
D. The Sponsor shall prepare an annual ledger report, on each anniversary of the date of
execution of this agreement, showing all credits used, any changes in credit availability (e.g.,
additional credits released, credit sales, suspended credits, etc.), and the beginning and ending
balance of remaining credits. The Sponsor shall submit the annual report to the DE, for distribution
to each member of the IRT, until such time as all of the credits have been utilized, or this agreement
is otherwise terminated.
5

Version December 2016
Section IX: Financial Assurances
A. Financial assurances for the Bank site(s) will be detailed in the site-specific Mitigation
Plan(s). The Sponsor shall provide financial assurances in a form acceptable to the DE, sufficient
to assure completion of all mitigation work, required reporting and monitoring, and any remedial
work required pursuant to this LIMBI. The financial assurance value should be based on the cost
of doing the mitigation work, including costs for land acquisition, planning and engineering, legal
fees, mobilization, construction, and monitoring. For preservation only Bank Sites, no financial
assurances will generally be required unless there are specific activities necessary to ensure the
successful preservation of resources on the site, in which case appropriate financial assurances
may still be required.
B. All financial assurances shall be made payable to a standby trust or to a third -party
designee, acceptable to the Corps, who agrees to complete the project or provide alternative
mitigation. Financial assurances structured to provide funds to the Corps in the event of default
by the Bank Sponsor are not acceptable.
C. The form and amount of financial assurances must be stated in the site-specific Mitigation
Plan(s) in order for the Mitigation Plan to be approved. This must include the name of the specific
provider of those assurances and the method by which the financial assurances will be provided in
the event that they must be utilized. Original copies of the financial assurance documents must be
provided to the DE prior to the initial release of credits.
D. A financial assurance must be in the form that ensures that the DE receives notification at
least 120 days in advance of any termination or revocation.
Section X: Site Protection
A. The Sponsor shall grant a Conservation Easement (CE) in form acceptable to the DE,
sufficient to protect the Bank Site(s) in perpetuity. The CE shall be perpetual, preserve all natural
areas, and prohibit all use of the property inconsistent with its use as mitigation property, including
any activity that would materially alter the biological integrity or functional and educational value
of wetlands or streams within the Bank Site, consistent with the Mitigation Plan. The purpose of
the CE will be to assure that future use of the Bank Site will result in the restoration, protection,
maintenance and enhancement of wetland and/or stream functions described in the Mitigation
Plan. The name and contact information for the Corps approved easement holder and a draft copy
of the CE will be provided in the site-specific Mitigation Plans(s).
B. The Sponsor shall deliver a title opinion acceptable to the DE covering the mitigation
property. The property shall be free and clear of any encumbrances that would conflict with its
use as mitigation, including, but not limited to, any liens that have priority over the recorded CE.
C. Subsequent to the recording of the CE, the Sponsor may convey the Bank Site property
either in fee or by granting an easement to a qualified land trust, state agency, or other appropriate
nonprofit organization approved by the Corps. The Sponsor is responsible for ensuring that the
CE is re-recorded so that it remains within the chain of title. The terms and conditions of this
6

Version December 2016
conveyance shall not conflict with the intent and provisions of the CE nor shall such conveyance
enlarge or modify the uses specified in the easement. The CE must contain a provision requiring
60 day advance notification to the DE before any action is taken to void or modify the CE,
including transfer of title to, or establishment of any other legal claims over, the project site.
Section XI: Long-term Management
A. The Sponsor shall implement the long-term management plan as described in the site-
specific Mitigation Plan(s).
Sponsor Contact:
Mr. Gary M. Mryncza, P.E.
KCI Technologies, Inc.
4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
B. The long-term management plan will include a list of annual maintenance, monitoring,
and/or repair activities for the mitigation site, the associated annual cost for each activity, and the
required total amount necessary to provide all future site management. The long-term management
plan should explain how the funds will be managed and provided to the designated long-term
manager (e.g., an endowment managed through a separate account holder). The long-term
management plan should include a contingency section that addresses how the responsibility and
funding for the long-term site management will be passed on to a new manager in the event that
the selected long-term management entity is no longer able to provide for management of the site.
Section XII: Default and Closure
A. It is agreed to establish and maintain the Bank site(s) until (i) credits have been exhausted
or banking activity is voluntarily terminated with written notice by the Sponsor provided to the
DE and other members of the IRT; and (ii) it has been determined and agreed upon by the DE and
IRT that the debited Bank site has satisfied all the conditions herein and in the Mitigation Plan. If
the DE determines that the Bank site is not meeting performance standards or complying with the
terms of the instrument, appropriate action will be taken. Such actions may include, but are not
limited to, suspending credit sales, adaptive management, decreasing available credits, utilizing
financial assurances, and terminating the instrument.
B. Any delay or failure of Bank Sponsor shall not constitute a default hereunder if and to the
extent that such delay or failure is primarily caused by any act, event or conditions beyond the
Sponsor's reasonable control and significantly adversely affects its ability to perform its
obligations hereunder including: (i) acts of God, lightning, earthquake, fire, landslide, or
interference by third parties; (ii) condemnation or other taking by any governmental body; (iii)
change in applicable law, regulation, rule, ordinance or permit condition, or the interpretation or
enforcement thereof; (iv) any order, judgment, action or determination of any federal, state or local
court, administrative agency or government body; or (v) the suspension or interruption of any
permit, license, consent, authorization or approval. If the performance of the Bank Sponsor is
affected by any such event, Bank Sponsor shall give written notice thereof to the IRT as soon as
is reasonably practicable. If such event occurs before the final availability of all credits for sale,
the Sponsor shall take remedial action to restore the property to its condition prior to such event,

Version December 2016
in a manner sufficient to provide adequate mitigation to cover credits that were sold prior to such
delay or failure to compensate for impacts to waters, including wetlands, authorized by Department
of the Army permits. Such remedial action shall be taken by the Sponsor only to the extent
necessary and appropriate, as determined by the IRT.
C. At the end of the monitoring period, upon satisfaction of the performance standards, the
Sponsor may submit a request to the DE for site close out. The DE, in consultation with the IRT,
shall use best efforts to review and comment on the request within 60 days of such submittal. If
the DE determines the Sponsor has achieved the performance standards in accordance with the
mitigation plan and all obligations under this MBI, the DE shall issue a close out letter to the
Sponsor.
Section XIII: Miscellaneous
A. Modification of this UMBI shall be in accordance with the procedures set forth in 332.8 of
the mitigation rule.
B. No third party shall be deemed a beneficiary hereof and no one except the signatories hereof,
their successors and assigns, shall be entitled to seek enforcement hereof.
C. This UMBI constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject
matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements or undertakings.
D. In the event any one or more of the provisions contained in this UMBI are held to be invalid,
illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability will not affect
any other provisions hereof, and this UMBI shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or
unenforceable provision had not been contained herein.
E. This UMBI shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of North
Carolina and the United States as appropriate.
F. This UMBI may be executed by the parties in any combination, in one or more counterparts,
all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
G. The terms and conditions of this UMBI shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of
the parties hereto and their respective successors.
H. All notices and required reports shall be sent by regular mail to each of the parties at their
respective addresses, provided below.
Sponsor:
Mr. Gary M. Mryncza, P.E.
Discipline Manager
KCI Technologies, Inc
4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
8

Version December 2016
Corps:
Mr. Steven Kichefski
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District, Asheville Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Suite 208
Asheville, NC 28801
828-271-7980 Ext. 4234
USEPA:
Mr. Todd Bowers
Wetlands Section - Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
USFWS:
Mr. Byron Hampstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
160 Zillicoa St
Ashville, NC 28801
NCWRC:
Ms. Andrea Leslie
Mountain Habitat Conservation Coordinator
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
645 Fish Hatchery Road, Building B
Marion, NC 28752
NCDWR:
Mr. Mac Haupt
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
NCSHPO
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
109 E. Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
9

NMFS:
Mr. Ken Riley
National Marine Fisheries, NOAA
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Version December 2016
10

Version December 2016
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement entitled
"Agreement to Establish the KCI Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank in Surry County,
North Carolina":
Sponsor:
ME
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers:
Date:
By: Date:
11

Version December 2016
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement entitled
"Agreement To Establish The KCI Yadkin 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank, Yadkin River
Basin in the state of North Carolina":
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:
By: Date:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service:
By:
Date:
N.C. Division of Water Resources:
By:
Date:
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission:
By:
Date:
NC State Historic Preservation Office:
By:
Date:
National Marine Fisheries Service:
By: Date:
12

Version December 2016
List of Appendices
Appendix A: Geographic Service Area Map
Appendix B: Mitigation Plan (Each plan should include construction costs, maintenance and
monitoring costs, draft copy of financial assurance documents, draft copy of site protection
instrument, and a long term management plan as appendices to the plan.)
13