Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0044776_Pretreatment Compliance Inspection_20190415POY CoopER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN 5eceerary LINDA CULpEPPEtt Director Town of Hamilton Kerry Spivey PO Box 249 Hamilton, NC 27840 NORTH CAROLINA Crviranmental quattty April 15, 2019 SUBJECT: Town of Hamilton 4/11/2019 Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Permit No: NC0044776 Martin County Dear Mr. Spivey: Enclosed please find a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection conducted on 4/11/2019. A copy of the Approval letter for the Headworks Analysis is attached for your file. Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff have any questions please contact me at 252-948-3843 or via email at Robert.e.bullock@ncdenr.gov. cc: Laserfiche Sincerely, Robbie Bullock Environmental Specialist II <M North Caro 6rza Depart of EAVITd Memtal Quality I D7Vs�n of Water. Resources kWash rgton Regona i Office 1 043 Washingte n Square M ail I iW.ssb m�tua, North Camera 27S&S /w" 252-949-9491 NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)] 1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: _Town of Hamilton 2. Control Authority Representative(s): _Kerry 3. Title(s): _Wastewater Pretreatment 4. Last Inspection Date: _5-8-2017 Inspection Type (Check One): ❑ PCI M Audit 5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? M YES ❑ NO 6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES M NO Order Type, Number, Parameters: PCS CODING Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number • NI I N I C 1 0 10 14 141717 6 Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type UII 1 191 1 P I L 3 1 L1 (DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC) 7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)? I SIUS 8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)? CIUS 9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 0 11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10 0 NOIN 12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP 0 NOCM 13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC) PSNC 14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods 0 MSNC 15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods 0 SNPS 16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi-annual Periods 0 POTW INTERVIEW 17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations? If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed? 3-2018 BOD and TSS violations, 1-2017 TSS violations, 4-2018 TSS violations. These were a result of a heavy rain and I&I. 18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased Sludge Production, Etc.) If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed? 19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC for Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Put 20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division? 21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which Ones? M YES ❑ NO ❑ YES M NO Limits: NA Reporting: NA dished: NA NA ❑ YES M NO LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW: 22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? M YES ❑ NO 23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? M YES ❑ NO 24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ❑ YES M NO Is Table Adequate? ❑ YES M NO 25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ❑ YES M NO 26. If NO to 23 - 25, list violations: Facility doesn't use a table for STMP data. The facility uses the report from Environment 1. The January 2018 STMP sampling results were not reported on the eDMR. The January 2018 eDMR needs to be revised to report effluent NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1 STMP samples. 27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES M NO 28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW - Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in their files, complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info: Program Element Last Submittal Date In file? Last Approval Date In file Date Next Due, If Applicable Headworks Analysis A) 4-19-18 ® Yes ❑ No 10-26-2018 ❑ Yes M No 4-1-23 Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) 5-17-17 M Yes ❑ No 5-18-17 M Yes ❑ No 3-1-22 Sewer Use Ordinance SUO) 11-7-12 M Yes ❑ No 11-19-12 M Yes ❑ No Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) 9-20-16 M Yes ❑ No 11-29-16 M Yes ❑ No Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) 5-12-16 M Yes ❑ No 6-30-16 ❑ Yes M No 6-1-19 INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR•1 FILE REVIEW AND I IU INSPECTION) 29. User Name 1. Penco 2. 3. 30. NP Number 001 100 31. Does File Contain Current Permit? ®Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 32. Permit Expiration Date 2-3-2023 33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A 34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior ®Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No to Permit Issue Date? 35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year? FM Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No [-]Yes ❑ No 36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan? a. ®Yes ❑No a. ❑Yes []No a. ❑Yes ❑No b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW) b. ❑Yes ❑No b. ❑Yes ❑No b. ❑Yes ❑No 37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic ®YespNopN/A ❑Yes 7No❑N/A ❑Yes❑NopN/A Organic Management Plan (TOMP)? 38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division? a. ®Yes ❑No a. ❑Yes ❑No a. ❑Yes ❑No b. All Issues Resolved? b.OYesONo®N/A b.OYesONoON/A b.OYesONoON/A 39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete M Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow? 40, Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms? M Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No 41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its ®YespNopN/A ❑YespNopN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow? 41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports ®Yes❑No❑N/A ❑YespNoON/A ❑YespNopN/A on time? 42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does ❑YespNo®N/A ❑Yes❑NoON/A ❑Yes❑NopN/A file includeprocess/dilution flows as Required b [UP? 42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include OYesONo®N/A ❑Yes❑NopN/A ❑Yes❑NopN/A production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP? 43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify M Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑.Yes ❑ No All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling? 43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify 0Yes0No9N/A ❑YespNopN/A pYesONo❑N/A All Re ortin Non-Com liance from SIU Sampling? 44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self- a.®YesONoON/A a.OYesONo0N/A a.OYesONo0N/A Monitoring Violations? b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days? b.NYesONoON/A b.OYesONoON/A b.OYesONoON/A c. If applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware c.OYesONo®N/A c.OyesONoON/A OYesONoON/A of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU? 46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC? ❑ Yes M No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken ®YesONo❑N/A ❑YespNopN/A ❑Yes❑NopN/A as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, t in , etc.)? 48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices? []YesONo®N/A 0YesE1No0N/A 1❑YespNopN/A 49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection? []YespNo®N/A ❑YespNopN/A ❑YespNopN/A 50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders? a.OYesONo®N/A a.OYesONoON/A a.L]YesONoON/A b. IS SIU In Compliance With Order? b.OYespNo®N/A b.OYesONOON/A b.OYesOMEIN/A 51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This M Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form t.ipdaled 7/25/07 Page 2 Requested Information For You? 1 FILE REVIEW COMMENTS: A copy of the Approval letter for the Headworks Analysis is attached. The facility was reminded that the Short Term Monitoring Plan has to be submitted to the Division by June 1, 2019. The January 2018 eDMR needs to be revised to report effluent STMP samples. INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING: Trans.Code Main. Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type Nl l l l LI I I I I I I I S I 1 2 1 (DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC) 1. Industry Inspected: 2. Industry Address: 3. Type of Industry/Product: 4. Industry Contact: Title: Phone: Pax 5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ❑ YES ❑ NO 6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly? Comments: A. Initial Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO B. Plant Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO D. Sampling Review ❑ YES ❑ NO E. Exit Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO Industrial Inspection Comments: OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS: Comments: Requirements: Recommendations: NOD: ❑ YES ® NO NOV: ❑ YES ® NO QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO POTW Rating: Satisfactory x r a UnSatisfactoD PCI COMPLETED BY: DATE: NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form t1pdated7/25/07 Page 3