Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout240047_INSPECTIONS_20171231NORTH CAROLINA Department of Environmental Qual M (Type of Visit: (X=outine e Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance I Reason for Visit: O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: D L Arrival Time: O Departure Time: County: Region: Farm Name: Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Phone: Facility Contact: Title: Onsite Representative: 1, 1v ar i Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Phone: Integrator: Certification Number: / 6 31 ie� Certification Number: Longitude: Design Current Swine Capacity Pap. Wean to Finish Design Current Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow D . P,ouIt , C•_a aci. Pia , Non -Dairy Layers Beef Stocker Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Non -Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Qther Other Turke s Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Imuacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? []Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [�o ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 21412015 Continued jFaciky Number:- - Date of inspection: n Waste Collection & Treatment 4. I5.storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: I Z_ 3 V Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 3 S 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ED- ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 12<o ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑'Flo ❑ NA ��NE� NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA NE [:]Yes [:]No ❑ NA D-Iq�E Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes E5No -NA D NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑Yes To 0 NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [1-N-o L❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections udNge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ A NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �[:] NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facili Number: -vy jDate of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ETNE 25'Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Oles ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Fai -to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels j� Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon / List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ONoO NA ❑ NE [:]Yes 2,N-o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [ .N6' ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE ❑ YesqZ�"OaNA ❑ NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to_question4) Explain'"any YES answers and/or any-addltionaI -'- rnmendatians or any other comments _. r. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations: (use additional pages as necessary). or, 4- oc c i(ec( IA,-c P'Sc� ss� 0,:?,N C105eD S� Z S-r Le4 3 e_ �0�� r f •-+� f�� x r�x 1 I J Reviewer/Inspector Name 011&�l l; C0'_4 e Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y Page 3 of 3 �s Phone: (j l Q*7 1 b 7~30 4 fo Date: 7 21412015 3DSWG �ihTeedl6t.OPe'ration Rev16W', T spe i p n ni al edlof0b&ation Site. 0 D.WQ"-A m e 0 C 0 Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0Follox-bDofDSNA'Crcview 0 Other Facility Number Date of Inspection Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time Farm Status: Total Thne (in hours) Spent onReview or Inspection (includes travel and processing) FarmNanie: --far �, - - — ------ PlioneNo:..Lq1M (04T-4i% Nlailin-tP ..... Onsite Representative: Certified Location of Farm: Operator -Certification Number:. Ml _ .T,.Kc.� �Q . _ ,. t47�i, ..�l1(?1L-�[. } 1'i ...ZSp3 ._ -.._i5.... a:..� ._n ... Lei ---_.. _ .� _ _.. r ....._ ... ....__ _....-....... . . . ...... . .... Latitude Loncritude 1 0 10Not Oper2tional Date Last Operated: rype of Operation and Design Capacity General 1- Are there any buffers that need maintehan:cefimproverneht? 0 Yes] No 2- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?.- a- If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes , E&NO -[I Yes* IjE No 0 Yes PBN-o 0 Yes ;&No El Yes' [9 No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require maintenance/improvement? EI Yes 56No El Yes 'W No Continued on ba,- 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes (0 \o 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? ❑ Yes No 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No Structures (Lagoons and/or Holdins Ponds 9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONTO Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenancerunprovement? (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels? NN"aste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) IS. Crop type .. L-ba, 4` �D Q�LI'i ► .. _. ?h1 i l� .. _ ...... .... 16. Do the active crops differwith those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?. 18. Does the cover crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? For Certified Facilities Only • - 20. Does the facilityfail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Managemenf Plan readily available? 21. Does the facility fail 'to comply with the Animal, Waste Management Plan in any way? 22. Does record keeping need improvement? 23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrmspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No [A Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [9 No ❑ Yes 5a\To ❑ Yes j5d No ❑ Yes . Na . ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes R No ❑ Yes 5dNo ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes [9No ❑ Yes ® No fL• (.a, rtS 6A 04 36ol} 6L. *,atx). 01� w' bon syl�fm an I01Oon '*Z s4uk) be rt:noA L'. No M S c,re pm1,n��ca6 S r�5 o4 rr'P�nJ (eye s_ fAmillor POSS11-L, evoslaA areas oh incur (&Ix^ caoalls. ge- coyr Q o+ b w avus i n cm)s Reviewer/Inspector Name Revfwer/Inspector Signature: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit Date: 5" Mz 11/14/96 0 0 Site Requires Immediate Attention: Facility No. ` L DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: bM , 1995 Time: :63 R-n Farm Name/Owner:rara/AAp lcgfnti,� Frn,e,�� r�ycfgrAr �rtc. s7fe Mailing -Address: 2- � `Ie.� syel 0 .rc.4 lfosj9 &A 4 h„ /C, z z� County: u Integrator. Phone: On Site Representative: c- Dn Phone: Physical Address/Location: 1JS 7 6 I .Fr�.M w� ��4 U ��Q _� �Ie4s 7�� r►_ �t � 417 Type of Operation: Swine V Poultry Cattle Design Capacity: �� so 2a Number of Animals on Site: DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW Latitude:Longitude:Elevation: Feet Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event (approximately I Foot + 7 inches Ye or No Actual Freeboard: 176 Ft. . (0_ Inches Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes of Was any erosion observed? - Yes TO Is adequate land available for spray? Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate? es r No Crop(s) being utilized: -e Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings: Te or No 100 Feet from Wells? Yego Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes No Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man. -made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes C(9 If Yes, Please Explain. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes Additional Comments: I U-_� k_ 17- 66A hC Inspector Name S Rip cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.