HomeMy WebLinkAbout240047_INSPECTIONS_20171231NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual
M
(Type of Visit: (X=outine
e Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: D L Arrival Time: O Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: 1, 1v ar i
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: / 6 31 ie�
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pap.
Wean to Finish
Design Current Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I
INon-Layer I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design Current Dry Cow
D . P,ouIt , C•_a aci. Pia , Non -Dairy
Layers Beef Stocker
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Qther
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Imuacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
[]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
[�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued
jFaciky Number:- - Date of inspection: n
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. I5.storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: I Z_ 3 V
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 S
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ED- ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 12<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑'Flo ❑ NA ��NE�
NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
NE
[:]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
D-Iq�E
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes E5No -NA D NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑Yes To 0 NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [1-N-o L❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections udNge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ A NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �[:] NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued
Facili Number: -vy jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
ETNE
25'Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
Oles ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Fai -to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for
sludge levels
j� Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon /
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ONoO NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes 2,N-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ .N6' ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ YesqZ�"OaNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to_question4) Explain'"any YES answers and/or any-addltionaI -'- rnmendatians or any other comments
_. r.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations: (use additional pages as necessary).
or, 4- oc c i(ec( IA,-c
P'Sc� ss� 0,:?,N C105eD
S�
Z S-r Le4 3 e_ �0�� r f •-+� f�� x r�x 1 I
J
Reviewer/Inspector Name
011&�l l; C0'_4 e
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y
Page 3 of 3
�s Phone: (j l Q*7 1 b 7~30 4
fo
Date: 7
21412015
3DSWG �ihTeedl6t.OPe'ration Rev16W', T spe i p n
ni al edlof0b&ation Site.
0 D.WQ"-A m e 0 C
0 Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0Follox-bDofDSNA'Crcview 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: Total Thne (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
FarmNanie: --far �, - - — ------
PlioneNo:..Lq1M (04T-4i%
Nlailin-tP .....
Onsite Representative:
Certified
Location of Farm:
Operator -Certification Number:. Ml _
.T,.Kc.� �Q . _ ,. t47�i, ..�l1(?1L-�[. } 1'i ...ZSp3 ._
-.._i5.... a:..� ._n ... Lei ---_.. _ .� _ _.. r ....._ ... ....__ _....-....... . . . ...... . ....
Latitude Loncritude
1 0
10Not Oper2tional Date Last Operated:
rype of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1- Are there any buffers that need maintehan:cefimproverneht? 0 Yes] No
2- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?.-
a- If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
0 Yes , E&NO
-[I Yes* IjE No
0 Yes
PBN-o
0 Yes
;&No
El Yes'
[9 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
EI Yes 56No
El Yes 'W No
Continued on ba,-
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes (0 \o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? ❑ Yes No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holdins Ponds
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONTO
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancerunprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
NN"aste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
IS. Crop type .. L-ba, 4` �D Q�LI'i ► .. _. ?h1 i l� .. _ ...... ....
16. Do the active crops differwith those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?.
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only • -
20. Does the facilityfail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Managemenf Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail 'to comply with the Animal, Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrmspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
[A Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [9 No
❑ Yes 5a\To
❑ Yes j5d No
❑ Yes . Na .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
R No
❑ Yes
5dNo
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
[9No
❑ Yes
® No
fL• (.a, rtS 6A 04 36ol} 6L. *,atx). 01� w' bon syl�fm an I01Oon '*Z s4uk) be rt:noA
L'. No M S c,re pm1,n��ca6 S r�5 o4 rr'P�nJ (eye s_
fAmillor POSS11-L, evoslaA areas oh incur (&Ix^ caoalls. ge- coyr Q o+ b w avus i n cm)s
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Revfwer/Inspector Signature:
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit
Date: 5" Mz
11/14/96
0
0
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. ` L
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: bM , 1995
Time: :63 R-n
Farm Name/Owner:rara/AAp lcgfnti,� Frn,e,�� r�ycfgrAr �rtc. s7fe
Mailing -Address: 2- � `Ie.� syel 0 .rc.4 lfosj9 &A 4 h„ /C, z z�
County: u
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: c- Dn Phone:
Physical Address/Location: 1JS 7 6 I .Fr�.M w� ��4 U ��Q _� �Ie4s 7�� r►_ �t � 417
Type of Operation: Swine V Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: �� so 2a Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:Longitude:Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches Ye or No Actual Freeboard: 176 Ft. . (0_ Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes of Was any erosion observed? - Yes TO
Is adequate land available for spray? Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate? es r No
Crop(s) being utilized: -e
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings: Te or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yego
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man. -made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes C(9 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes
Additional Comments: I U-_� k_ 17- 66A
hC
Inspector Name
S
Rip
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.