240007_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAKULINA
Department of Environmental Quai

�Iiivision of Water Quality ;
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit 10 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 4utine O Complaint Q Follow up a Emergency Notification XOther(YC ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Time:
e Facility Number
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted [] 0ertified Q C�oynall
�ditiony Certified[3 R eered Date Last Operatedyr Above Threshold: _...
/ County: (%✓lc�a
Farm Name:
Owner Name: f,�tL eJZLt� Phone No:
_Failing Address: .._ _._ _.. _.._ _ _ _ _ ._ .. __. _.................._.... - _ . ...... _ . .
Facility Contact: _ __ _Title:. _ _ _ Phone No:
Onsite Representative:�� �.. Integrator:'.!
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
I&
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 Du Longitude • 4 �u
Design Current Design Gnrrent:;; Design Current
Swine Capacitv Po elation Poultry Camcity POP92fioil Cattle Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish f- ©r✓ ❑ Non -Layer I JE3 Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder Other
Farrow to Finish
Gilts ty
Boars 'owSMW
INumber of Lagoons
Discbanes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min-?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste CoUection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes 10
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes . R�No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes Po
Structure 6
Identifier: ..._........._............
_ _
Freeboard (inches):
12112103
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ief trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 9No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or []Yes ❑ NO
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ;2`No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancermprovement? ❑ Yes P(No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes No
elevation markings?
Waste Applieation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Z No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes gfNo
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overlgad ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper andlor Zinc
12. Crop t ,� off)&AA / / ,Cf 6 ) ins ., L1-Z14AA1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Platt (CAWN2)? ❑ Yes V No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ONO
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes Uf No
I6. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes JgNo
Odor issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes P�No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes gNo
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes �fNo
roads, building structure, and(oI public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes FefNo
Air Quality representative immediately. '
Comments (refcx:ta tlncstian #).:EYpleia any YES answers andfar any rerammendatias or any other comments:
,Use drawings.offacility :ta betterexplain situations. (use addifioiW pages mtntcesmry)x ❑ Field Copy D Final Notes
-0,0iJJf ti)Z�774 3;0/.(tj 619 C
5�we A C`66-op
r
Rervrewerfinsgrector Name
Reviewer/inspector Signature: 111117A Date; I
12112103 v r Continued

R Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes J21 No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 0
Yes Pr No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ONO
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes (f No
26. FaiI to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes 0 No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes Ef/No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes VNo
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes XNo
NT TDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDF-S Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
, Yes ❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ONO
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ONO
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes XNo
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes J'No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form [:]Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
r-pow.,
D �
12112103

z
Division of Water Quality=
Division of Sail and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency ,
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint 42 Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 7 2� O� Time: t Q
^7
rO Not O erational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Cond"etionaflyCertified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
G
Farm Name: ce r` GA r o'i, Pi, [ r }4 5,Pe s County: C, o I v *- , b of T
Owner Name: 6 e G; i ,ar y1h) P Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Ce C f3A,-r n hr I
Integrator:
Phone No:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
[]Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle []HorseLatitude o 6 u Longitude Oe 4 Du
Design
Swine _ Ca acit
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Holding Fonds / Solid°Traps,
Trent Design Current Design Current
elation Poultry Capacity Population Cattle capacitv Po ulation
❑ Layer I I ❑ Da
❑ Non -Layer I I Non-D
❑ Other v
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW'
Subsurface Drains Present JLJ Lagoon Area LLJ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream imuacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Candnued

Facillty Number: Z — r% Date of Inspection O
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes El No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenanceiimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11- Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13- Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
[] No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18- Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUP, checklists. design. maps. etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DIVQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(ie discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
23, Did Reviewer.Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
;?fNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
IE3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Commenti (refer io gaestion i)f Ezplaim any Y1;S siiswers andioir any recommendations or any other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pares as necessary): [] Field Copv ❑ Final Notes
MC4 Feuv- i'1 +"Oflewy Js 21 2Zlea jns 4;11
h e,5 r u,-i fe4( o q4 41, e d i 4 c-b1, -f_)t c qA "jr ?" -44 e -r eI4 e,4,o e -rl+v "14
h�wb� �erL--ovEal 3a 1 eJA c i•j dr Mlle c lee,,,v� 4'y ctr 'a- ed
�
Ale, 8rj--� ti��1 ��� Golfe c�r� �,�e141 -ted'e w;-I, Ar so k0+16'-
i S�►"t"�-� f'v , S C ASS („�a-�C.AGt%�Vy i�'ro�Iemer45-t�Lvrq.4e, /' co4,eel
Reviewer/Inspectorblame -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: c Date: zs 4
05/03/0f Continued

e
Division of Water Qnality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit `Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: Z �' Time: �'
� �
rO Not O era€ionai 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted 13/ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: l .� C. T 1 �o, h 11 �' � Ti}�OI� S r v� County: 0 & • "` b's
Owner Name: r ie6 0 Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: } ) Title:
Onsite Representative: ��°► 'h `�'� �J
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
,fin Phone No:
Integrator:., ` V h't7 ` O."DW Y)
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude + C r� " Longitude ' �• ��
Design Current
,)Wine k-apacilty Y© uianon
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
I1 Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Finish.
Gilts
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca aeity Population
❑ Layer I I❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy I
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): J
05103101
PYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
El Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ,0No
Structure 6
Continuer!

Faciliq- Number: 2 { - r] Date of Inspection ©s
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7- Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9- Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
«ante Apnlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement7
11. is there evidence of over application? Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN XHydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
,TZI'es ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAAAW)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14- a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the faciiity need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16- Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Rem[ uired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DR`Q of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie' discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Re-,fewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewiinspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ;ZNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer- to gnesdd_i 1):' Explain any YES ansi'vers and/or say recommendations or any outer comments:
Use drawings of facWty to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
I-K �S n ,3 pe G� ; O LJa S 4 a rt e% h ie f Oh SC' 4 D !1 I� y a v E v' r r1s, , 10 c1
T4
4AA� observed PVAA. �e Ar l,'6q4,`,a_� w � �'," ��' w�.Lk t?4 f aJs�G/e
� P �
if L.i�S-e �Dt,'rt �nC.� WaJ �� rr G�%sc�►��' i in-'O
Pb�Ypnf are 4e s4-re- li e",
S✓A
-c a-�► - e dc, w+ S -F6 t- fd �j e1r 10revC n4 ,<-✓�s-i�� >�i^G r�-. Gait-�."'-t ,�+"� �c
T
Reviewer/Inspector NamesTi-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of inspection OS
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or bclow
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no aVitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation. asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the ia,00n?
30. 'A'ere any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i_e. broken fan belts, missing or
Or broken fan blade(s)_ inoperable shutters. etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
a?. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentitemporary cover?
❑ Yes [3 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cj Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Y vh4 � �e ,'�%� Gj �'�al Q a �� i T�►e Olt ►�4G a a ha �/ � ��'►c�
.�� F G�; �GI, ba G � -�'� �'�t � G r� ®� +ter � S o r�-, e rv►.nD�,' � " 1' �� � :inn, � �e%T d >�O
b � r�c�e -�p €' �e v�e� � r� �v,rren �� O � ��-r .t � � ua� > r�►�
05103101

*rDivirsion of. Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservationx r
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit 4 Compliance Inspection O Op ration Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit GrRoutine O Complaint *Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: E d� Time: 1 dl Printed on: 7/21/2000
Z
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted © Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...............
Y Farm Name; .....................-.............................
� ' ° l 4vK h,11 4Sor} S F.,, , Count i vr+1 ��
.................... ..........................................jj........................................................... Q..._....
OwnerName; .... ....... C .�...I.... 0.� �.�..!......................................................... Phone No:.............................................................. ......... _.
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address: - ..............................
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:...
Location'of Farm:
Title:
Phone No: ....................................
-.-............................-•--...........-----............................ ..........................................................
r12h...........%.................................I............ I�ntegrator:..C`�''..... r' �'
Operator Certification Number: .............. . ............. ...........
❑ Swine © Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 6 66 Longitude 6 «
rFarrow
Feeder
Finish QQ
Wean
Feeder
Finish
Gilts
Boars
Nuunber. of Lagoons
Ha 000000 : / Solid Traps
Current Design Current Desigki Current
n ulation Poultry ClkDaClft Population Cattle -Capadgy Population
❑ Layer I I ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I JE3 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Subsurface Drains Present JILT Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed- what is the estimated flow in gat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ;$No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:...I.......... .................. ............ ......... ................. ................................... ....... I ............................ .................................... ......... ................ ...
w._.,
Freeboard (inches):6
5/00 Continued on back

Facility NiAmber: ZLf — Date of Inspection 1 11 d Printed on: 7/21/2000
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 0 Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes 70No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
:: Va•yiblafi6hs:or• &f%clencies were nbted- ding tjfls:visit; • Y:oi�r will-;eceiye iio further : :
:: ' corresp61idence: about: this :visit:
Comments (refer to question #). Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
�r►�1veG 4 ;&�. co &J,_Of Qsof 4F DSt,1G rrtrrG{lah. •
19. G�-owd,Y vsed 74 lbs PRN/Atre an =K7C-Z15 10, 1°191- ZOoa
srvta+l��aJ'*n 'Cret.�las�� fart a�ls �d (lr,.s P,IVAICOnrp Use
%�g.'nr�in_ Pgl�l Affo{,vghce ��o,s{� pia', ern
)5. Se 61, sh 6e' -%v*q i3Yt newt 1p✓lolvgrcaj q s ;y. s�v�
KA
Reviewer/Inspector Name .S4p rti q �f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: t�,rJ 1- 1ta /_�rg Date: i / / 5/00

a © Division of Water Quality: Tv cse%+ t 1, l4
••��. Division of Soil and Water Conservation j p
v
.,WY
0 Other Agency r
of Visit O Compliance Inspection U Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: Ca26-2©00 Time: 12:©Il Printed on: 6127/2000
24 7
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ■ Certified [3 ConditionallyCertified [3 Registered p
g Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................
Farm Name: .............................................................. County: Colu Clain........................................ MR.O..........
Owner Name: CgCij........................................ B.altluhili...................................................... Phone No: 914-65,4,-.455I........................... -..............................
Facility Contact: O..Y.Ur.................................................... —.......... Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: 6031,HgyKtN.L.C8!111.HWy............................................................. .Y. r.; �L.�YG..................................................... 28.43.8 .............
Onsite Representative:.Qymoir.............................................................................................. Integrator: C,ACIwjj!KQQtlsl=................................ ........
Certified Operator:.Williara.C............................ Blar:ahxil...........
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:1692X .......... - .................
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 34 • 23 b4 46 Longitude 78 • 52 6 54
Design Current
Design Current
DesignCurrent
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capackv Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
1❑
Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
4400
❑ Non -Layer
1 El
JLJ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
LJ Farrow to Feeder
ID Other
Ll Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
4,400
Ll is
Total SSLW
594,000
LJ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 1111 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
n/a
❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ...............29...................
Continued on back

Facility Number: 24-7 Date of Inspection 6-26-2000 Printed on: 6/27/2000
5. -Are thus; any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
I I. Is there evidence of over,application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ® Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted during thisvisit You will receive no furtheir
correspondence about this visit.
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
I I- Mr. Barnhill was using 70 lbs/acre of nitrogen on the Irr-2 forms for small grain over seed instead of 50 lbs/acre causing him to
over apply on some pulls. Some over applications were at 14 lbs/acre over.
5- The newly cleared land needs to be sprigged. The field where the cell tower is has bermuda in it, but needs to be sprayed and cut
ontrol weeds.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Trent. en
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number: 24-7 1 Date of Inspection 6-26-2000 Printed on• 6/27/2000
Oder IssuM
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
J

Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality
16 Routine ® Complaint 0 0 ow -up of DWQ inspection O o ow -up of DSWCreview p ter
DMe of [nspection I J
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit 0 Permitted In Not Operahona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Cecil.RarshiU.aud.SAs&Earm.........................................•-----•--.............. County: Columbus WiRO
Owner Name: Cerll........................................ Bara"I ..................................................... Phone No: 210-.65.4-:455i......... .............. ..................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: b4.31.Hayj=Leitnoxt.H.r�r.......................................... _................ Eycrgr=..N.0 ...................................................... 28438 ..............
Onsite Representative: Cx cilBarnhill............................................................................ Integrator: lCarxoll:s.F.o4ds.J=...... .......................................
Certified Operator:W.jUiam.0............................ Barnhill........................................... Operator Certification Number: 1028-........... ....a.. .... ...
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®0 ©4 ®44 Longitude ®0 ©& ®46
estgn , Uurrent.
Swine Capacity:: Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to can
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finis
❑Gits
p Boars
esign 'Current Vesign Uurrent..
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population '-
❑ Layer ❑ Datry
p Non -Layer ❑ on- atry
❑Other
Total Design Capacity 4,40
Total SSLW 594,000
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds ❑ u sur ace rams resent p agoonArea p pray �e rea
❑ o LiquidWaste anagement System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes 13 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon 13 Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man -trade? p Yes N No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsiholding ponds) require p Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7/25/97

kaeflity Number: 24_7
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds. Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 40"
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop type ...... oastalBermuda.Grass.......Srqall.Crzai�n�.�(.1ri��T.h=�t'Barlgy.....................a............. ......................................................... e....�....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated m the' An1al Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? N Yes p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R o-violations.or ctendes-were.note -during this visit:. om .reeeive nor u er . -
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ig No
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.,
Use drawings of facility to better a plain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
. Vwner has seeded area
to establish cover.
6. WUP was written for coastal and fescue. Owner has coastal bermuda planted in all fields. Need to have plan revised to show
tis. Any grazing of fields also needs to be in waste plan. Current plan allows for grazing small grain.
7125/97
LA
Reviewer/Inspector Name Andre:D Oxendine
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:.. Date: .. rr

JUL--14-1995 15 : 22 FROM BEM WATER QUAL I T`f OEC ION TO WIRO P.02i02
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
• DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7 a N , 1995
Time: ( S-0L)
Farm Name/Owner_
Mailing Address:
County:
integrator-. fw4i Phone:
On Site Representative: �N/,__ _ Phone:
Physical Address/L.ocation: t r-- r ,>
N
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: YYD v Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEw
Latitude: _` - 'D 3 ' 2-9 " Longitude: '7 Y" q-d- ' Elevation: � meet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
• (approximately l Foot + 7 inches) 6e)or No Actual Freeboard: _'�_Ft. 0 inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes Was any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray? r No Is the cover crop adequate? No
Crop(s) being utilized.: `
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria7 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a liSGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain,
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure. land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
0—
} y,^, n
_4
Inspector Name
lure �v
Use Attachments if Needed.
/20`1
cc: Facility Assessment Unit

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency x
13 Division of Water Quality
O Routine O Complaint 8 Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of InspectionIt I oz LA
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered ® Certified [3 Applied for Permit ® Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date bast Operated:
Farm Name: ....1 t.0 ;...k...-. saR.tir., ► .s-- .t...S . ..S�: e� �.... 4.Y... ... Cow�tr :... .u.ux.s .�d ,i...................
.
Owner Name :........ .....1..j..........................,� cxr,nIn..., ... I.A ........................... Phone No:. .. .1.. .. ...-... ...7r.j................
:..
Facility Contact: -,,,•.,,,....... _ ... ...._.................. . Title: ........ Phone No:
Mailing Address: ....... . ..... ... ..... . .. .. ... Cr .. .... 9-3- 32.
Onsite Representative:... .y ... ��..r.,ti..x..�. �...... .......... _......... .... Integrator:...
Certified R&.x. .................. Operator Certification Number,...JC... q..2,.,g............
Location of Farm:
..... e a'-4....A.......'5..Ir .A ..11—:..........._.........................................................................................._................—............. A6
.............----- .r..... _....................... .... ............----.___......................... ............................ _............ ....................--.._..............................-........................................... ........ T
Latitude ©0 6 44 Longitude • ©° 46
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Continued oir back

Facility Number: a q —I
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons.Rolding Ponds. Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........ .....................................
Freeboard(ft):........... ....................... ............................. ...... .............. ......... ........ .................... ............. ...................................... .-..................................
I0. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.............................................................................................................................................................. ._.....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management flan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17- Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
[] Yes
❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® No.violatio'nsor. dericieneies.were-noted duning this.visit. You.wili receive no further.
il!6& s0undebbe Ahoiut -this:visit: ;
Fo Low v p V i.i i T7 0 a s Via... io t—, j vf-� ,J,i d-+r c i f
v.r" C-a 4.Ck� C o w y-a- t b Vi v;; E s oV-4 5 ` f �� o •�
c.. -{ t-- Inf a.- l y oL �i. w a- 1 t ►^ i� C:� q 0 Oct
kt t-v� t-i `�`� CA V_L"� .� t l a t� q D 0
G_.0 Soo,., Qs P o Soy to
t -g ,rya t l y .� Q-v�o1• 1 t �-�r' '�e •— 1 A_& t'o �- � � ; W 0 r 1t' -
CA
1 7/25/97
ReviewerlInspector Name = c # # r k e
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: n- 'N. / „L p Date: w I q -I