540010_INSPECTIONS_20171231 (8)

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua

INSPECTIONS,
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

Facility Number S t# I
Date of Inspection i4= 7 98
Time of Inspection 17 5 24 hr. (ttlt:mm)
p Registered © Certified 0 Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not Opera( Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: D r. t........+Pp ct County: .............�.`....".......................................................
Owner Name �� Phone No: .�.......... ..................................................----.
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:
MailingAddress:...........................................................................................
Onsite Representative:...,, ... .........Al� ........
C l I, P-
.. ...............................................
Certified Operator: .... .... ..... ....2ann_/............. 9'. ".,4........................
Location of Farm:
Latitude
Design, prrent
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
2 Farrow to Wean
1200
ew
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
PhoneNo:.. ........................... ..................
..................................................................................... ..........................
Integra#or:... '�^ C 14 -.".:1
Operator Certification Number;...---....
Longitude
OmiginkCurrent:... igw. z urrent:x.
Poultry .... Capacity. Population'.' Cattle. Caparaty: Population
.'Number of:�;agonns 1 Holding Poinds 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ©Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area N
No Liquid Waste Management System
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
main tenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125t97
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IR No
❑ Yes U No
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on back

Facility Number: S Lt— 10
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 19 No
Structures (La oons oldie Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 8 No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier: 5,„'d i ark- ................................. _......... ... ................................................... .....................................---............... .....
Freeboard (ft): ...y .5..
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes Ik No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 19 No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
CH No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type - �e"!----.---. ......... - la". .................... ,0- . A'
---------- ------ --------------------............................... --........... ---- ------------
........ -----.................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
E3 No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
M No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
For
Certified or Permitted Facilities Onil
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
(5 No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[3 • No violitiohs'6i dericiencies. were noted during this;visit. � You:*il] receive• no further" : -
_
c0rrespi)ndeke d out this:visit : .
10,
Til
7/25/97
Reviewer/InspectorName '
r yy �s .¢,� '$� tl yam`.
""e:ii`'"Ya..." ".k., iu :^x ,.iL.... _. . YeXdb.i :..'�.'�i. '°°¢R«'.. �I °i&"s`Ikw.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

,.: ..... ............. ................. ..................... ............
DSWC Animal Feedlot Peration Review
W Animal Feedlot ection
......... .
;u
y
D Aeration Site Insp
® Routine 0 Complaint
U Follow-ue of DWQ
inspection Q Follow-up of DSN C revie", V Other
Facilit►' Number 5 17
Date of Inspection
t' —► '
Time of Inspection
® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered © Certified
13 Applied for Permit
0 Permitted
I Date Last Operated:..._....,
[3 ;Sot Operational
Farrar Name �"`�
-................................................................................
. I .,. l
................... County:............1
^ ..?.....................................................
.`.'.... ar
(}js'ner Name: ................
Phone No:.........
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:
MailingAddress: ........................ . ................................ ............
Onsite Representati%'e:............�R7...... �.. � �............ .........
.
Certified Operator: .................
Location of Farm:
PhoneNo :...................................................
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number,
Latitude • 6 " Longitude ' °
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
1220'
El Farrow to Feeder
/22a
❑ Farrow to finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Mc
Design Current Design. Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity. Population
❑ [.aver ❑ Dairy
❑ Nnn-Layer I[] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoun Area ❑ Spray Field ,area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there anv buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes IN No
2, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 9 No
Dischnr2e 0626 aced at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- If discharge is observed. was the cojivcvance man-made, ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If dischar�_>e is observed. did it reach Surface Water" (if yes. notity DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. w'Iiat is the estimated flow to _allnun?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (It yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 09 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'? ❑ Yes M No
5. floes any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes I] No
maintenanceli anprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes (O No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 6 No
7/25/97 Continued on back

• w
Facility Dumber: 5;11 — fp
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes IN No
Structures (Lap-oons,Holding_Ponds, Flush Pitstcj
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes El No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Idell tiFier Q!.
-. -..... ....... ............ ............................................................................................. ...------.........................
..........
Freeboard
.. .................................
(ft):...........................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
C9 No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
No
Waste
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP. or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ......Car' V -4" ..
.......................•....... ................... ............ ................... ...................................... ....................... ..............
..............................--....
lb.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yeti
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage For land application?
❑ Yes
IN Na
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
WNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
14 No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
i6 No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative"
❑ Yes
@�No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement'?
El Yes
[,No
ror Certified or Permitted Facilities Onl�-
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available`?
ElYes
[INo
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this'visit. .Yo'U.Wi11 re-ceive'no further
corres*ondence about this.v�isit:
...
Comments (refer to question #]::.Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations.or'any other comments.. "
Use drawings of facilityto. better ex lain situations:.(use additional pages as,;necessa
p .. p g ry)::
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 29, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN CEIPT REQUESTED
eraine Howard ❑ ier
Owl Pond
1373 Davis Mill Rd
Deep Run NC 28525
Farm Number: 54 -10
Dear Leraine Howard Collier:
Aw
C.-D + .
F4CDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
JUN 4 1998
WASHiN -TOM REGIONAL OFFICE
You are hereby notified that Owl Pond, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter', your farm has
six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or
operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT
OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned
within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before retuming the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Carl Dunn with the Washington Regional Office at [phone].
SincerelyJr., P.E.
,
A. Pre ,
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
l
Washington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27625-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recyciedl 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.rfj
P
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATI S SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: ]� l , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: = C_ 4
Hailing Address: �T. L_
County: [_7.-� rZ 17
Integrator: ,
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
cs'� L-'-)
Type of operation: swine Poultry Cattle
Desicz Capacity: � No. of Animals on Sited w /"d Ro 1/2, i,-Qw%o
DEM CertifigcLation No. • ACE DEM Certification No.: A�W
Latitude: 3L Longitude: Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freebpat* of I Ft r 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) Yes o
Actual Freeboard: Ft -< � _ Inch
e
Was any seepage observed from the laaoon(s)? Yes o No'
Was any erosion observed? Yes or No,
Is adequate land available for sway? Ye No
Is the cover crop adequate? Y s or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SC inimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? Yes or No 100 Ft from Wells. Yes or No
Is thermal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line 5tre m?
Yes a Na
Is animal was
applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a ❑SGS Map Blue
Line? Yes o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state rri an -made ditch, flushing
rny
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or o
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
nspector N me Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments &.Sketch an Back of Sheet
tpgy

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two /� ,L -
C omrnent s : SCF �l
c
Sketch:
- q,A5 r

OPERATI�IS RBI - WQ Fax:[phone]M J '95 12:46 P.16f16
FAX [phone] P. 08
+' "JLL " ina is.e33 USDA sm wl F#MI 1978ml P.03103
F�na�a
SITE VISITATION RE `
oOW.
a :4nv
AgaM nj ris
for: Cad"
Tjrpe a! raBort; .� PC 7 cm
tic .._�
Typ,ofwtmftaAWN
CUM T a or No
OM 00 Mmal WOO LWM nm wWO heboW of 24 hoUr iUm evert
OWwkft* t FaA +7 h*u) Y=
AaWd I`� Wag
Fcr 6cfts aft mars tm om bow, FWw edd = %oaM ttboard woder to
axmnmb sue.
Was any *VW wed Thom to *i? Yes
ft bm arwmof to damp? Vas
b 8*06 w trab* 16r tad appb"? No
k ire t a*adagsfia? Q0Ho
Ad anal C�t� �a. ee.� . -OLreA 4 - _ ,
sold" of , �
Feac to ist9]?i6-

State of North Carolina
{ - Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Washington Regional office
James S. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Nancy Smith, Regional Manager
Water Quality Section
August 1, 1995
Mr. Ray Collier
Route 1 Box 325
Deep Run, North Carolina 28525
Subject: Owl Pond Farm Animal Waste Lagoon
Facility No. 54-10
Lenoir County
Dear Mr. Collier:
•
ID FE F=?t
Division of Environmental Management
On July 31, 1995 staff from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of
Environmental Management inspected the lagoon serving your animal feeding operation.
It was observed that the lagoon had an insufficient amount of freeboard, water level in
relation to the lowest point of your dike wall. You should maintain a minimum of nineteen
inches of freeboard in the lagoon. This letter is written to bring your attention to this
situation and to ask you to, begin spray irrigating wastewater or take the appropriate
action necessary to reduce the level of your lagoon(s) immediately. Please note that a
buffer of twenty-five feet must be maintained while spray irrigating from any drainage
system (ditch, swale, canal, stream, etc.).
Please be aware that it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes to
discharge wastewater to the surface waters (farm ditches, creeks streams, etc.) of the
State without a permit. The Division of Environmental Management has the authority to
levy a fine of not more than $10,000 per day for the unpermitted discharge of wastewater
into the surface waters of the State. At some point in the future, staff will reinspect your
facility. Lagoon dikes should be mowed so they can be visually inspected.
If you have any questions regarding this letter I can be contacted at (919) 946-
Sincerely,
Scott Jones
Environmental Technician
cc: ne Wilbum
FO file
1424 Carolina Avenue. Washington. North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Af irmcr ive Action Employes 5C% recycled/ 10% post�onsumer paper