HomeMy WebLinkAbout080013_INSPECTIONS_20171231NORTH CARULINA
Department of Environmental Qual
INSPECTIONS,
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
-Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date- g : ze A Ir}
Time
General Information
Farm Name: _ �r��5 oyud -� S oc�,,Z , &F f_313)County: .d.-e- (e,
Owner Name: C� �{ �� s n :ig S _ Phone No �'1 �7' ice! tf - z e) `� 7
On Site Representative: � e--r le s �n z��1 If � _.Integrator:
Mailing Address:_ j qn�
Physical Address/Location:�i cr�I7�, 1 �S frn, s er�ra,� �..� '�--/�f� , ;j S 151
=�1 {� L { Csrr. t� cSr1 r'�Q a� S -0 4 I �lJ
[R)e�9cy 1r� �_.+i
J
Latitude: _ S 1 53 1!�7' Longitude: 76 1 -z f 3
Operation -Description: (based on design characteristics)
Type of Swine No, of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
• Sow/Boar ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Nursery Z d 6 ❑ Nou-Layer Ci Beef
Ct Feeder
OtherType of Liveswck. Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: I , (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Insnection:
f rago on
Is lagoons) freeboard less than I foot 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: `3 Yes G No E(
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ No a
Is erosion observed?: Yes ❑ No
Is any discharge observed? Yes U No Fr
0 Man-made Ct Not Man-made
Co ver Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑ No
Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes u No 2
( list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type:- Bpi^^-� �1 �x�� •� Acreage:.S
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application? Yes J No Q*"
Is a well located within 100 fee: of waste application? Yes U No U"
- Is animal waste stockpiled within 104 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No �
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No We
AO): -- January 17,1996
Maintenance yes Q No L
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? yes U No ❑
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation yes 0 No e-
Does record keeping need improvement?
a cop
of the Animal (Er Management Plan on site@ Yes " No 0
Did the facility fail to have py �
Explain any Yes answers:
s�5 r�
W—f r,r _
V'
I ffy
r = �- ' G- -FrIel t Jc t'= '"" Date:
Signature ~
Use Attachments if Needed
cc. Facility Assessment Unit
I3rawin s or Observations:
A.QI -- 3anuary 17,1996
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Ill't!�•]LIiC�l�i1�LlZ�7►1uL�i��_1_��rL' 'L'lr_[�+Fl�ilrl
Washington Regional Office
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form
n5Z - 1
Farm Name/Owner
Farm #
Date
C r f�5 kwaLJ I,eS Sw+rye rho
~7 (o-cis
Mailing Address
Phone Number
44 Kv%ow1PS Li,&,2 Win 0n N�-
G! I�y% `7117
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in the Comments Section to enable
the Deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate corrective actions;
SECTION I
Animal Operation Type: (circle the appropriate category)
Horses Cattle win Poultry
SECTION 11
1. Does the number and type of animal
meet or exceed the .0217 criteria?
[Cattle (100 head); Horses (75); Swine
(250); Sheep (1000); and Pouffry/Turkey
(30,000 birds with liquid waste system)]
2. Does this facility meet criteria for Animal
Operation REGISTRATION?
3. Are animals confined, fed, or maintained
in this facility for a 12 month period?
4. Does this facility have a CERTIFIED
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT
PLAN?
5. Does this facility maintain waste
management records (Volumes of
manure, land applied, spray irrigated on
specific acreage with specific- cover
crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the NRCS
minimum setback criteria for neighboring
houses, wells, etc.?
Turkey Sheep
Yes No Comments
IC
X
SECTION III
Field Site Management
1. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 feet of a USGS
Map Blue lane Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 feet of a USGS Map
Blue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover- crop in -accordance with- the
CERTIFICATION PLAN?
5. Is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made
devices?
6. Does the animal waste management at
this site adhere to Best Management
Practices (BMP) of the approved
CERITICATiON?
7. Does the animal waste lagoon(s) have
sufficient freeboard? How much?
(Approximately 0 _ f•
6. Is the general condition of this AFO
facility, including management and
operation, satisfactory?
SEC_nON IV
Nt7 boa
WaA L�Oa_L,
Yes No Comments
4
Animal Operations Inspection Form
1. Date of Inspection: 97519
2. Regional Office: c.. 4D Washington
3. Name of Property Owner:
4. Name of Operator: iR.Q,,
S. Address: /5-qD UICDt)
(�IQA , Alt"
6. Phone Number: -jcic f,;jj4
7. Description of facility location:
a. Date the facility began operation: o4G9 Y-oLd�
9. Date of last expansion: 1o[gj
Explain:
�j�e�n�� q
� �i f �/�� j�0 D)
10. Has the facility registered with DEM?c�
If yes, date registered?
11. Does the facility have an approved animal waste management plan? r�p
Is one required?
Date approved?
12. Has the facility received a CAFO Designation? a
If yes, date Issued?
13. Type of operation (Examples: ��uon�,etc.):
topping, dairy, beef, cattle, poultry,
breeders, layers, broilers, turkey pr
14. Number and type of animals: ra �, moot r,,ac k L 2ev
15. Length of time animals have been, are, or will be stable or confined and fed or maintallme
In any 12 month period:
15. Are crops, pasture, or post -harvest residues sustained In the normal growing season over
any portion of the lot or facility? C., � C n,`
17. Type of waste management (Examples; 1. type of confinement: free stall barns, sheltered
or limited shelter dirt lots, paved or dirt open lots, houses, or pasture; 2. type of waste
handling: direct spreading In solid form, slotted floor with lagoon or pit, single or multi -cell
lagoon, aerated lagoon, land application of liquid manure, spray Irrigation, stockpiling,
contractor disposal, etc.)? ��C
y 7�
18. Description of other animal operations In Immediate vicinity and proximity to same or other
surface waters:
19. Proximity of facility to neighboring houses, wells, etc.: pp1 �Ir� , IL�►o�.�+-d
20. Approximate depth of groundwater table in the area of the facility or discharge:
21. Proximity of facility to surface waters (provide name and class of surface waters):
22. Animal waste discharge Including photos and witness' names, addresses, telephone
umbers, and statements of fact]:
23. Are pollutants discharged into the waters of the state? If so, how? (directly or by man-
made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made device):
24. Do or have discharges occurred In response to a storm event of less than a 25-year, 24-hour
Intensity (if yes, include a brief listing of incidents and suspected causes):
25. What is the degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation?
26. What is the duration and gravity of the violation? +
kA-
r
w
27. Water Duality Assessment: (Include description of sampling, field measurements, visual
observations and slope and vegetative cover of land adjacent to water, extent of rainfall and
other factors relative to the likelihood or frequency of discharge of animal wastes and
process wastewaters ). The effect on ground or surface water quality or quantity or on air
quality.
28.
29.
30.
31.
What is the cost of rectifying the damage?
What Is the amount of money saved by noncompliance?
Was the violation committed willfully or intentionally? Explain:
What is the prior record of the violator In complying or failing to comply with programs over
which Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority?
32. What is the cost to the State for the enforcement procedures?
Staff Time (WARD): $
Staff Time (Central Office): $
Travel: $
Total Cost of Investigation: $
33. Type or general nature of business?
34. What is the violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore) or
recalcitrance (stubbornness)?
35. Are there mitigating circumstances?
36. Assessment Factors:
a. IWC:
b. Receiving Stream:
c. Damage (YIN - if yes, include report from WRC)
37. Include a copy of any Designation letter signed by the Director.
38. Recommendations made to owner/operator:
39. Recommendations for further DEM action (Re -Inspect, NOV, Enforcement Action, Designate,
etc.):
40. Other Comments:
C �.Ati7 r�.e.. � G�,�y_1� ��� V L G 7 L �`�'ti �r��� y� • A
,..4A.A— N.-- SIB`'�"'�"r�GflhliAl.
Y �•T Ca) a� PJA-"-